All Episodes
Previous Next
May 3, 2024 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
18:35
United Nations 2.0 EXPOSED!!!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We mandate that the truth be told.
You're hearing it. TNT. Joining me now is somebody who has been crashing through the lies and disinformation in a post-truth world for some time now.
His name is Derek Brose of the Conscious Resistance.
And Derek, you've got this new piece out there on the Summit for the Future, the United Nations 2.0.
I've covered this topic, but it's a rebranding of the same old Organization, really authoritarianism globally that they've been pitching through Benevolence for years, but now it really seems like they've gained traction and infiltrated so many elements of our society.
So tell us about this summit and what they're putting there on the table right now.
Absolutely. So the Summit of the Future is going to be taking place this September, the 22nd, 23rd in New York City.
And it's part of the broader week, well, actually more about two week long, United Nations General Assembly, which is an annual meeting.
The UN will be meeting for their 79th meeting this September.
And as I said, two days that are dedicated to this Summit of the Future, where they are alleged to be preparing to sign something called the Pact of Yeah, I think.
but you kind of hit the nail on the head there in the beginning. Their main goal
here is what they're referring to as UN 2.0 or revisiting, remaking
multilateral systems. All of these different euphemisms that we know and
those who've been paying attention over the years know really mean world
government, global government.
That's what this is all coming down to.
And I wrote this article, which dives into a little bit of the history of where the Summit of the Future comes from the last few years, because it didn't just start Just now it's been an ongoing, as you mentioned, it kind of rebrands and builds on previous agreements going all the way back to 1992 in Rio for one of the first UN environmental conferences.
So this has just been building and building for decades, but now we're at a point where The UN, the World Economic Forum, and a bunch of associated globalist organizations, Rockefeller Foundation, and of course this leads to the Club of Rome and others, are essentially saying it's time to declare a planetary emergency, and to do that we need to have stronger global government systems.
And it really seems like the summit for the future, which is coming up in just a few months, Is going to be a major step towards that, at least in terms of them signing this new agreement.
And, you know, I guess we'll have to see what happens there and what, you know, what the coming years after that look like, because we know they're racing and they say in their own documents that they're committing to the 2030 agenda, agenda 2030, to make it happen on time.
And again, these guys have been very, very patient in their past works, right?
You've had not Agenda 2030, but Agenda 201, and all these other things.
You mentioned the Kyoto Protocols all the way back in Brazil.
And right now, they do have scary traction.
And for all those people that used to laugh at me, at least, that kind of peripherally paid attention to the UN, they said, oh, the UN doesn't really have any power.
The World Health Organization doesn't really have any power.
Attitudes changed after COVID. And right now, we also have this pandemic treaty that they're trying to push through.
So we see on multiple fronts that these things are moving forward.
Now, we even have the global health security that we've covered here.
Just within the United States that what?
Encompasses many, many different nation states, not just in a promise, but economically.
And really that's been the mantra of what?
Davos, this public-private partnership and stakeholder capitalism.
So kind of talk about how this is all being homogenized right now and that's why really I am concerned with this timeline because now if you question elections and you're at some kind of level that might be able to make a difference, a county commissioner, Someone that can try to propose an audit.
No, instead, you're not only spearing the media, which may have been a tactic 10, 15, 20 years ago, but they'll criminally charge you.
So it's becoming extremely hard even to expose the corruption of elections that are not free and fair.
So, you know, this is a global governance system in their own words.
So kind of talk about that timeline and the avenues they're pushing this forward.
Yeah, absolutely. And just anybody who doubts what you were saying there, Jason, that they're really trying to push beyond the idea of national governance or local governance into this idea of global or international governance.
Just a couple of months ago in January, the summit for the future is being led by Germany and Namibia, who are the co-facilitators of the summit.
And they released what's called the zero draft of the summit.
So we got the first look at this massive document and what they're going to be Proposing and what they're calling for.
And it pretty much restates previous documents.
One was put out in 2020, and this is coincidental, right?
June 2020, the United Nations is announcing their 75th anniversary, and they put out this declaration, which they were calling on the Secretary General Antonio Guterres.
The member states were saying, We need to recommit to Agenda 2030.
We call on you to issue a report.
He issued that report about a year later.
It was called Our Common Agenda.
And it was during the Our Common Agenda report that this call for a summit of the future really began.
So you could kind of see it all beginning.
But I just think it's interesting because that month, June 2020, is the same month that the World Economic Forum announced the Great Reset.
And they first put out all the propaganda and videos about it and Klaus Schwab's book.
So both UN and World Economic Forum were working on some big things at that time.
So now here we are, January 2024.
They released the first zero draft.
And it says several times that they're going to leave no one behind.
So don't worry. They're not leaving you behind.
They're trying to bring everybody along with it.
And they say multiple times, we're going to accomplish the 2030 goals on time, in full.
There is no other way. And in this one section, they talk about, quote, reinvigorating the multilateral system.
And that just means, of course, the multi-governance system says that this draft...
We'll commit the UN to a vision of a multilateral system that is, quote, inclusive to allow for a diverse range of actors beyond states.
And I think that plays exactly into what you're talking about, the stakeholder capitalism that the World Economic Forum has been promoting, NGOs, think tanks, corporations, nonprofits, whatever.
That they have a voice.
They want it to sound like they're talking about, oh, the people, we're all going to have a seat at the table.
But no, they want all these extra players and sort of modern-day fascism, corporate and state working together, extra-governmental working together.
And so that inclusive to allow for a diverse range of actors beyond states, to me, that's saying right there.
And of course, they speak in very coded, veiled ways.
It is modern-day fascism to the T. Modern-day fascism to the T. We've got to take a quick break.
For the headlines, stay tuned.
We're going to continue with more on this summit of the future after this.
It's TNT. For TNT, this is James O'Neill.
Beijing was responded sharply to new U.S. legislation that counters Chinese influence, including an $8 billion investment in Indo-Pacific security and a potential TikTok ban, warning of forceful retaliation that the U.S. does not reverse these actions.
State troopers used pepper spray and stun grenades to arrest at least 40 pro-Palestine protesters at the University of Texas in Austin, as tensions on U.S. college campuses escalate.
Globalist agendas.
Democratic rights at risk.
Corruption. Propaganda.
It never stops for the news and views silenced by the mainstream media by government and corporations vote one
TNT radio free speech always has a home here stay up to date with the latest live news and current affairs
Delivered by our lineup of expert commentators and hosts listen to TNT radio anywhere you go ask Alexa or Google to
play TNT radio or download the TNT radio app for free from the
App Store or Google Play today's news talk This is TNT Radio.
Now, Derek, when we talk about the language, right, constantly they make it sound like this is for equality when they use the term equity, that we're going to have a stake in all this and it's for Mother Earth.
But when it comes down to it, they're also using very outward language That is provably false like climate crisis.
And this carbon credit system is now really gaining momentum globally as traditional currencies and systems are failing on a level we've never seen.
So let's speak to that because a lot of people don't realize that if we do go to this digital currency, a lot of people talk about a quote-unquote social credit score.
That will be directly Integrated and encompassed by this idea of a climate crisis and a carbon credit system, correct?
Absolutely. And, you know, the Summit of the Future, their zero draft, I just mentioned before the break, it actually discusses this.
There's a section that says, we need a global financial system that works for all people.
Like you said, they want it to sound like it's, you know, this is, we're all finally getting a seat at the table.
It's inclusive, just, representative, effective, and resilient, and responsive to the world today.
But this is all about pushing us towards the CBDCs, and they're definitely using the climate Alleged crisis as one of the many avenues to push in this direction.
I also reported that last June, and not many people caught this, there was only a few mainstream headlines in France about it, that in June of last year, French President Emmanuel Macron hosted the Prime Minister of the UK, hosted Biden, hosted so many heads of state from across Europe, and they had what they called the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact, which was just another one of these sort of things.
and they keep using language saying, we need a new Bretton Woods moment.
And as you know, Jason, it was Bretton Woods where the original IMF and World Bank were first conceived.
And it was where the arrangements to have all countries trading in US dollars,
which made the dollar very strong.
That was what they call the Bretton Woods moment.
So the last few years, we've had people like Klaus Schwab, the head of the UN and documents like this
over at the Zero Draft, the Summit for the Future and this Global Financial Pact,
specifically saying it's time for a new Bretton Woods moment.
It's time to remake the financial system.
So when they're talking about the Summit of the Future and the Pact of the Future, this isn't just about having another UN meeting where they discuss.
I believe this is definitely going to be a major step in terms of putting the financial pieces in place.
But absolutely, as you also mentioned, this is very much about climate change.
It's even mentioned in this document That there should be a new international criminal court for people who harm the environment.
And it's interesting because it actually says, even if you're a government official, military officer, corporate CEO, etc., etc., now in a perfect world, I could see something like that working and we could get, you know, the military people who are responsible for not only war crimes, but dropping bombs and harming the environment.
Because for those who don't know, the U.S. military is actually the biggest polluter in the world.
You know, you could see some value to that, but we know that that's not what it's going to be about.
It's going to be about What's on your plate and how often are you driving?
Do you have enough carbon credits?
It's going to be about going after the individual.
So this is in this document.
This is in what's being discussed.
I wanted to mention just one other piece real briefly is that they also call for the UN to institute an emergency platform that could be activated, and this is their own words, in the event of such a shock that it has an impact on multiple regions of the world where the UN could Would require a coherent, coordinated and multidimensional response.
So this is them getting ready to declare what they're calling a planetary emergency.
And they want the UN to include in this pact for the future, which they may sign in September, a planetary emergency climate fund, basically an emergency fund.
And if the UN was to declare, okay, multiple parts of the world are being affected by climate crisis or economic collapse or alien, whatever, you know, all these different cards they may play.
They could institute this, declare a planetary emergency, and the UN would have a lot of power.
And it sort of plays right into the World Health Organization Treaty and that trying to give the WHO a lot of power.
We're seeing these globalist organizations really step up.
Absolutely. And I want to hone in what you just said about the U.S. military, right?
A lot of people don't understand that the U.S. military, based on the fact that we bomb, and plus, we don't even know about our testing folks, but do you understand the carbon emissions of a CBM? Like, Syria, people have no idea.
But they don't mind because it's doing what they're really concerned about.
When they tell you too many people are doing too many things and that's why we have climate change, they mean you're living.
And we don't like that.
So we'll use all the carbon in the world to literally kill you And your friends if we deem it necessary.
I mean, that's a real dark reality for people to understand, but that is really what's happening.
So that's not even measured.
See, they don't get measured when they put off a drone and a missile, and we're talking all sorts of carbon emissions.
That takes out five people.
They're darn happy to do it.
Doesn't matter about your carbon footprint anymore.
Now, the other thing, That is really important to that is the selective enforcement.
Now you talked about climate criminals.
The truth of the matter is this carbon credit system lets corporations pollute and do whatever they want and use as much carbon Again, a big tell that this isn't about saving the environment.
The more they use, the more they pay into the system of these credits, which will ultimately not even trickle, but rain down on the general populace and literally micromanage every aspect of our lives.
Again, am I exaggerating or am I hitting the nail on the head on that one?
You're 100% right, Jason.
Like you said, the average person won't be able to afford to buy this carbon credits where you can sort of buy your way out of this.
Oh, sorry, you can't drive this week.
Sorry, you can't eat a burger this month, etc.
Where the people who are obviously wealthy can just buy all kinds of credits and pretend like they're super green.
It's the faux green movement. We're also seeing – this has been going on for a while, but this is part of this new agreement – what they sometimes call debt-for-nature swaps, where after the IMF and the World Bank have already come in and bankrupted some South American or developing African nation, and they started stealing all their diamonds and gold, but they just can't get out of debt.
Well, now they'll do debt-for-nature swaps.
Okay, you got a rainforest. We'll take that in exchange for your debt.
And now that's owned by some big corporation or some government.
So this is not about saving the planet.
It's all about the same people who've created these same problems that the planet actually does have, you know, actual pollution, destroying the oceans and things like that, that we should look towards the big players like the corporations and the military, etc.
The same people are the ones who are driving this conversation and now they're here to present themselves as the heroes.
We need more people to pay attention to this.
If you want to see the full article, it's at theconsciousresistance.com and you can get into all the nitty gritty details.
I'll just end with saying that It leads to the Club of Rome.
The Club of Rome is not the only organization, but if you don't know them, look more into them.
They had a big hand in helping the World Economic Forum in their first couple of years, and they've been calling for a planetary emergency since at least 2019, since before COVID. They put out a document called the Planetary Emergency Platform, and wouldn't you know it, here it is five years later, and the United Nations is potentially about to sign a document calling for a planetary emergency.
So how do we move away from this?
Again, how do we get the momentum that we've gotten with the pandemic treaty?
And now I'm not saying that's going to fail, but at least people know enough about it that it has a chance to fail.
Obviously, we're going to have delegates and representatives and power players that, you know, have, you know, value within not only our corporate world, but our political world that are going to attend no matter what.
How do we push away from this?
Is the bottom line we have to get behind people like Mike Lee that say defund the UN, let's get out of the UN altogether?
I mean, what do we do? I think we have to fight on every front, Jason.
And that might include, like you said, if there's politicians who are open and willing to speak against Agenda 2030 and speak against the United Nations.
Unfortunately, as you started earlier the conversation, people get smeared right away.
You're just some right-winger conspiracy theorist.
But I think there's more people who see beyond those false labels.
You need to find people who are willing to speak up on the local level, state level, international, whatever you got,
But also, for me, in terms of the summit of the future, like you said, a lot of people know about the WHO treaty.
I think.
I don't know too many people who really know about this.
This is why I wanted to talk about this week.
And I wrote this article and I've been doing interviews and videos about this.
I'm hoping in the next few months we can build up awareness.
I don't know if that means, you know, go protest outside the UN building on that day.
Maybe that's You know, effective to reach people on the streets.
But in terms of actually stopping this, we need to become vocal because, I mean, with the WHO Treaty, it got to the point where Tedros is having to address conspiracy theories about the World Health Organization Treaty, the voices and the pushback and all the way in Japan and different countries and Iran, other nations pushing back and saying no.
It got loud enough that they had to address us and say, oh, there's conspiracy theories about sovereignty and this and that.
They wouldn't be saying that if the voices weren't getting loud enough for them to hear.
So I think we need to try to build up the same awareness.
And perhaps by September, there's that same kind of pushback and maybe it won't go through.
I mean, that's the best I can say right now.
We don't have a lot of power, unfortunately, to stop what the United Nations does.
But this is exactly the point.
Imagine a world where The United Nations can just pass whatever law.
Next thing you know, your local city is doing it.
And the cop says, well, the UN said so.
There's no representation. How do you really fight and push back about that when the so-called representative is thousands of miles away in New York City or Switzerland or wherever the UN wants to be based at?
And they don't represent you in the first place, Derek.
Again, if it gets that far, that is the authoritarian.
That's the authoritarianism.
That's the regime. We do have to push back.
It's the summit of the future.
The Conscious Resistance is where you can check it out.
Derek, thank you so much for joining us.
We've got to take a break.
When we come back, we've got Bayes Lit Analyzer.
▲
Export Selection