I Want To Debate "Not" Elon Musk AKA Adrian Dittman!
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more Watch My Documentaries:
https://rokfin.com/stack/1339/Documentaries--Jason-Bermas
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior #BreakingNews Show less
Today, yet again, on the Alex Jones show, Adrian Dippman appeared.
And for those that are unaware of the whole Adrian Dippman thing, Adrian Dittman, I just want to make sure that everybody knows what I'm saying here.
I do not believe in itself or himself is Elon Musk.
And why do I say that?
Well, I say that because one of the criticisms I've had about Elon Musk is kind of like this almost like pseudo cartoon character creation is that if you were running just one of these companies, whether it be SpaceX, whether it be Tesla, whether it be the Boring Company, etc.
Just one of these things.
Twitter, obviously now.
You know, in order to run something like that, that's going to take your, I mean, that's going to take it all.
You know, oversight on something like that is no joke, right?
So I've always said, you know, how does he already have all this time to do all this press and all these interviews, et cetera, et cetera.
Then you look at Dippman, okay?
Who clearly, to me, is one of two things.
And I brought this up on the Alex Jones show today because I was in spaces because once Dippman, I saw Dittman was in spaces even before he was speaking.
I'm like, you know what?
I'm going to join the space.
And I was hoping that I was going to actually be able to interact with Dippman.
And because I want to debate what I think is either a bot or a surrogate.
And what do I mean?
What do I mean by being a bot or a surrogate?
Sorry, I've got another dog over here.
Well, clearly, this is not like an actual person.
Even today when they were talking about doing work and engineering and being in similar work, etc.
If you watched my video on Dippman and the Alex Jones Ike interview, you know, when I was listening to it, obviously I was convinced that it was Elon Musk.
Then when I started doing research on it afterwards and saw this entity and the fact that Dippman was hosting like a six or seven hour space afterwards, I mean, I think that would be impossible to be Musk.
Now, the idea of AI that fast, I mean, it's a possibility.
You know, it's a definite, like, even at the end today, he said, you know, kind of laughed about it.
Dippman did a mimetic AI.
And he goes, I guess if I were that, I wouldn't even be aware of it.
You know, other than that, what are the differences between Musk and this Dippman character anyway?
And how they would respond in public.
The only thing that I've been able to see that is the difference between Musk and Dippman is that Dippman claims to be married.
Okay.
And Musk currently, I don't believe, is supposedly married, right?
That's it, right?
Otherwise, you know, and that's why I wanted to get on and I was going to ask Dippman because they were talking a lot about the old hate and lies Badoopa dupes.
Okay.
I wanted to ask directly about the Curevac and Tesla partnership to create the micro nano factories that, you know, the Bedonka Donks were printed up in and how he increased his wealth 600% during that whole scenario.
I mean, I think that's where I start, but I don't know, man.
Think I can get into one of these Dittman spaces.
And when I say a surrogate, what do I mean by that?
And what do I mean by a bot, advanced AI?
Okay, a surrogate in the sense that come on, guys like Musk, in many respects is already kind of like this cartoon character right, and I mean again it's, he's like a promotional item.
I don't know how to say it other in any other way.
So you could certainly train somebody to have all the same talking points.
He doesn't necessarily have to look like Musk, but he would have to sound like Musk and have the cadence.
Okay.
So like a high-level, high-scale Musk impersonator and promoter.
Okay.
And you could actually utilize this person as Elon, as a surrogate in telephone conversations, obviously things like X spaces, etc.
Now, I would assume, you know, if this is an actual thing and they are paying a surrogate or we'll get into the high-level AI, that what that also means is that Musk himself would also have access to that account and he could be interchangeable at any time and be Adrian Dittman.
You know what I'm saying?
And that's why, again, now in retrospect, and I think I said it, you know, to Alex Jones and G. Edward Griffin, that I never felt more like I was in the post-truth world than during or after that interview.
I just, wild stuff, everybody.
Just wild stuff.
So G. Edward Griffin was actually the guest of the time and a total props to G. E. R. Griffin.
I don't really speak much more highly of any individual and their research.
You know, I love G.R. Griffin.
We have our differences for sure.
And I think that's a good thing.
But he is the dude, the rugged individualist, the guy going against this idea of whether you want to call it socialism or communism.
What is it?
Collectivism, you know, and tyranny in all sorts.
And they were talking a lot about his book, A World Without Cancer, which also was a documentary film.
I mentioned it from time to time.
Something he did before, the creature from Jekyll Island.
So, you know, G. Edward, a living legend.
And because I came in on the space and I was the first to get in while G. Edward Griffin was on, oddly enough, they had the QAnon shaman, Jacob Chancely queued up, but he was muted.
And anyway, again, bizarro world.
Anyway, G. Edward Griffin really took a great position on Elon Musk with Alex Jones over the next half an hour.
And there was a real discussion about controlled opposition and not just trusting Elon Musk.
I could kiss you, G. Edward.
I could kiss you.
Like, my man.
That's what I wanted to hear.
And that's why I've got nothing but respect and love for him.
At the same time, right now, Alex Jones is putting on some of the most killer talk radio/slash internet TV, most compelling stuff in a while.
It's like, I mean, Jones straight up says that that is Elon Musk.
Uh-oh, I just got, oh no, just got hit by pricker bushes that are on the ground and now connected to me.
Let's see, we got rid of them.
All right, we got rid of the pricker bush.
We're doing it live here.
So G.R. Griffin, truly an icon, truly a living legend.
You know, I always tell people to be their own heroes, and I truly mean that, and I don't try to aggrandize people.
But if there is somebody that I have continually looked up to and have the utmost and the greatest respect for, it would be him.
100%, 1,000 times over, in so many regards.
You know, again, it doesn't mean I agree with the guy 100%.
I got a pricker in my leg from that, but he is somebody that I think has really helped shape the world for the better, right?
And it was funny because, you know, closing the interview out right before I jumped into the walk with Smokestack here, Alex was asking him, well, who do you think the most influential or freedom-minded person of the past century is?
And basically, G.A.R. Griffin was having a tough time with it because he's like, you know, a lot of those people who were the most constitutionally or individualist-minded, he thought, didn't break through, right?
But man, I think he said a guy named Dan Sutton.
And I'm not sure who Dan Sutton is, but he was like, you know, if I had to say somebody, you know, that was influence on me.
And, you know, Jones made the point, which I think was an ultra good point, that you never know.
Like, I couldn't tell you who Dan Sutton was, right?
I do know G.A.R. Griffin extensively, and he's done a lot of work that, again, supersedes just me and really even just this country.
I mean, people knowing about the Federal Reserve banking system, it's not chic.
It's still not popular.
But those that do want to know how it actually works, how it actually came into being, are often spoon-fed a version that is quite positive for those type of institutions, not only banking, but the roundtable groups and ultimately the charitable organizations, the NGOs that will surround them.
Griffin ahead of the game.
Ahead of the game.
And the creature from Jekyll Island really, I believe, turned some heads.
You know, I didn't bring it up when I was on the air, but it was G.A.R. Griffin that was being talked to by Andrew Callahan when I kind of blew up on Callahan.
Griffin's AI Controversy00:03:56
I was like, come on, man.
You really going to read that?
I tried to get Callahan on the show.
Callahan gave me his number, interviewed me for some time.
Hasn't put that out.
But then again, you know, he's been putting out some pretty recent, more gritty stuff.
He may be saving or sitting on the Red Pill Expo for, I don't know, just before the election.
I think we could see something around that time frame, possibly.
But I guess we'll see.
65 watching.
That's one out of every thousand and 20 subscribers.
That's how we do it here.
Yeah.
We're more than 10 minutes into a broadcast.
Can't get 100 people on this gorgeous day, by the way.
This gorgeous walk.
I'd say it's probably about 50, maybe a little less, maybe 45 to 50 degrees.
But me and Smokestack are doing it.
And by the way, let me say this.
I would, of course, debate Elon Musk any day of the week, but I got to admit to you that if I were actually debating Elon Musk, my heart rate might be going up.
I might actually be a little bit human, aka nervous.
I don't think that I'm going to be nervous if I'm able to debate Adrian Dittman on any level because Adrian Dittman, to me, again, is not Elon Musk and is kind of acting as a surrogate for Musk, whether AI or not.
And those that are dismissing this possibility of an advanced AI, let me just say this.
Google and that big quote-unquote whistleblower scam, right?
The guy that said he was working with an AI that was just like a person.
Now, on some level, that interaction may be very real in the sense that it is a responsive, large language model, possibly modeled after an actual person that they have a ton of information on.
And he's having that type of conversation.
And now, this Adrian Dittman is that type of technology when it needs to be.
In other words, even though it's that type of technology, Musk always has a back door to that account as well.
That's how I'm looking at it, man.
That's what I really think is going on.
Like, I don't know.
I'd love to get everybody's thoughts.
Again, let's thumbs this up, subscribe, share.
I know a lot of you are on the live stream right now.
Make a comment below after the fact.
What do you think of Adrian Dittman?
Do you think I'll get to debate Adrian Dittman?
Are you like me and you don't believe that Dittman is actually Musk and he is some type of a surrogate or bot program?
Because he could also, like I said, just be a somewhat impersonator and maybe the only bot-like thing is a voice mod.
You know, the AI voice mods have gotten very, very good.
I know mine is very, very commercial and low-level and low-tier.
But hey, who needs that kind of technology when you got this kind of nature, huh?
Huh?
That's what I'm talking about.
So I know a lot of you guys think it's Musk.
I don't necessarily think it's Musk at all.
You know, like I said, I'll have no problem.
I'll have no problem debating a Dippman.
Like, because I do believe it's the opposite of what Jones thinks it is.
Zach's Impersonator Theory00:01:20
But we'll find out.
We'll see what happens.
Look, you like the broadcast?
I do want to remind everybody, I do this cool show called Making Sense of the Madness.
It's over at the Patriot TV Rumble.
This way you can see it Monday through Friday.
6 p.m. Eastern is when it launches.
They've got a 24-hour stream, so you can watch it there.
But then also the whole show gets posted.
So please consider going to watch that.
I do a lot of very interesting interviews over there, some great interviews in the past couple of weeks, you know, from CIA Assets in the 80s to Joe Hoft from the Gateway Pundit.
Tomorrow I'm going to be having my boy Mark Shaftline and Zach Payne on.
I really do like Zach.
I think he's a really insightful, innovative guy.
So check that out.
And then if you want to financially support the broadcast, the links are down below.
$5, $10, $15.
Absolutely means the world to me.
You can do so by buying me a coffee.
I think the PayPal is still in there.
Look, bottom line, guys, you know the drill.
It's not about left or right.
It's always about right and wrong.
I loved what G. Edward Griffin had to say about the Muskerdew, the Muskernuts today.
And again, I don't believe that that is Elon Musk.