Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 25, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas

01:55:00

DEREGULATE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE NOW!!! | Reality Rants with Jason Bermas

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
	Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
	We think too much and feel too little.
	More than machinery, we need humanity.
	We know the air is unfit to breathe.
	Our food is unfit to eat.
	As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
	We know things are bad. Worse than bad.
	They're crazy. Silence!
	The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
	You've got to say, I'm a human being!
	God damn it! My life has value!
	You have meddled with the primal forces of nature!
	Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
	Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
	Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts!
	Glass shatters Cheering
	Yeah! Thank you! You're beautiful!
	I love you! Yes!
	You're beautiful!
	Thank you!
	Haha!
	Shhh!
	It's...
	Showtime!
	And now...
	The Element with Jason Vermis And who loves you?
	And who do you love?
	Good morning, good morning, good morning to these Reality Grants.
	I am Jason Burmes.
	And we're going to be talking about artificial intelligence, AI, global governance, and so much more today.
	That's how... Out in the open, these people are and have been.
	Again, sometimes I just go, whoa, whoa.
	So, doing my research this morning, first of all, I'll just say I'm going to kick this off here.
	Coinbase CEO calls for deregulation of artificial intelligence.
	Brian Armstrong says passing laws has unintended consequences and kills competition.
	See, I agree with most of that, except for the part of unintended.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	Very intentional.
	Extremely intentional.
	That's what this whole dog and pony show is, where senators go meet with these tech giants in a private conversation about artificial intelligence.
	This should let you know you're being treated like a child.
	You're not part of the conversation.
	You're not part of the process.
	Okay? The only way that you are part of the process is if you get out into the public arena with others, kicking and screaming.
	Alright? That's metaphorically.
	Although the screaming part might not be.
	We don't use physical violence.
	Physical violence will get you nowhere, especially with the robots coming in in New York City.
	Rolling out the R2-D2 bots in the subway...
	Notice they let subway crime get totally out of control where more people than in decades are being pushed onto the tracks and otherwise.
	You notice that?
	It's by design.
	It's exactly what this whole defund the police thing was about.
	And I called it out then.
	I said, this is to bring in the automation and the robots in places that get so bad because there's not law enforcement.
	And anybody who's watched my program for decades knows I'm not a quote-unquote back the blue guy in every situation.
	In fact, I rarely talk about people who serve in law enforcement, who serve in the military, because it's a mixed bag, baby.
	It's a totally mixed bag.
	I'm not naive enough to think that we don't need police and that we don't need a military.
	Right? That anarchy can work.
	That's imagination land.
	You might as well be sitting on a message board somewhere waiting for imaginary drops if you think that's the solution.
	Because it ain't. Because it ain't.
	I often hearken back to the beginnings of this country And when there was little to no government, and this is why the position is so important today in my opinion, what did you do?
	You elected a sheriff and he gathered up his deputies.
	That's what happened. You need law enforcement.
	Period. And when you don't have it, yeah, they're going to give you robot law enforcement.
	But moreover, getting back to where I was just like taken aback and like, whoa, whoa, is a couple months back.
	I think it's the, what is it, the Chatham House?
	Is it Chatham House?
	Man, I guess I'm going to have to look.
	Or the Chatham Institute, because Chatham House rules.
	Oh, this is a public forum.
	You've got two people.
	That I feature in the very beginning of Invisible Empire, A New World Order Defined.
	Okay? Over on the UK side, Prime Minister style.
	Up there, talking about not just global governance anymore.
	Global AI governance in an hour-long panel discussion.
	So I haven't watched it yet.
	I can only tell you that...
	What they'll do is, in my opinion, and we'll probably end up watching some of it on this broadcast, I got a ton of news stories.
	And then the second hour, where it's totally and completely uncensored over at rvmrumble.com, I also have another video I want to play that I will not be able to play in the first hour.
	Again, I don't agree with everything this guy says, but he's up on a podium and And he's a scientist and he is very, I would say, adept and experienced into looking at different, let's just say, biological and non-biological compounds under microscopes.
	And he has come to some stunning conclusions when it's about that.
	The old bibbidi-bobbidi.
	Okay? And again, he starts off with, I think, the wrong premise.
	And then, right before he gives you the meat and potatoes, he does say that he's being, I would say, generous in the fact that he's saying that this is not malfeasance.
	Instead, it is ineptitude, right?
	And it's always, oops, we didn't know!
	Oops! We made a mistake!
	Oops! It's an unintended consequence.
	Not an unintended consequence.
	But this guy's spot on.
	Spot on. And it's funny because I thought...
	Maybe it is right here.
	No, no. That's a different story.
	The reason I have it in the thumbnail with the wildfires...
	I'll just... We'll do it live...
	AI to combat wildfires.
	For some reason it brought me to a stock thing.
	But as you can see, these are some of the top stories.
	How California is using AI to snuff out wildfires before they explode.
	So artificial intelligence, whether you like it or not, it is already being implemented on a mass scale.
	Remember, none of this is truly artificial intelligence.
	These are large language models that run on programming.
	Alright? That's it.
	And when it's not open source, it's a screw job for the little guy.
	He, she, they who control the AI will control the world.
	Because they'll have unfettered AI access.
	The real AI. The real models.
	And that doesn't mean consciousness.
	That means that theirs won't be censored for the great narrative that gets sold to the rest of us.
	And because they will have proprietary software, they will have a highly, highly unfair advantage.
	Alright? And that's the real deal.
	Let's read some of this.
	Because actually ZDNet also did a really good article, open source.
	And these are, you know, straight out of...
	Straight out of this week. And by the way, got a ton of other stuff.
	Hopefully we're going to be able to hit it. We probably will be able to hit everything, I hope, in these two hours.
	It is a two-hour long broadcast.
	By the way, thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
	Let folks know about the show.
	Remember, the second hour is free over at rvmrumble.com.
	Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong believes the United States should not regulate or restrict the development of artificial intelligence at all, saying that any attempt to mitigate its negative consequences will only slow its progress.
	We've enjoyed a golden age of innovation on software and the internet largely due to it not being regulated.
	In fact, the only way it's been stymied lately is that it is being regulated and we no longer have an open market.
	Not only there's no open market of ideas, there's no longer an open market in any sense.
	And you could say, listen, there's always been pseudo-capitalism, really crony capitalism, and even outright fascism in a lot of cases in this country.
	That's not an over-exaggeration.
	That's how it works. But as far as the little guy being able to come up in some respects, yes.
	This will crush that.
	This will crush that.
	If we allow the regulation they want, it will crush that.
	Let's read this tweet here. Okay?
	Count me as someone who believes AI should not be regulated.
	We're going to follow this guy right now.
	Let's go right in.
	This guy's worth a follow.
	I don't know any of his other positions, by the way.
	You know, again, when we're talking Coinbase, you're talking digital currency.
	You're talking the blockchain.
	But all these things, again, are technologies, therefore double-edged.
	They can empower, they can enslave.
	They can empower, they can enslave.
	Have to realize that.
	We need to make progress on it as fast as possible for many reasons, including national security.
	And the track record on regulation is that it has unintended consequences and kills competition innovation despite best intentions.
	We've enjoyed a golden age of innovation on software and the internet largely due to it not being regulated.
	AI should do the same.
	The best protection is to...
	Decentralize it.
	And open source it.
	Let the cat out of the bag.
	Boom. 100%.
	100%.
	So, why open source is the cradle of artificial intelligence.
	And, you know, you're being told the opposite almost every single place else.
	In a way, open source and artificial intelligence were born together.
	Back in 1971, if you mentioned AI to most people, they might have thought of Isaac Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics.
	However, AI was already a real subject that year at MIT. Where Richard Stallman joined MIT's Artificial Intelligence Lab.
	And remember, MIT and the Defense Department, DARPA, long-standing relationship.
	Modern examples, Boston Dynamics, the Big Dog Program, MIT. They work hand-in-hand with this university.
	Okay? Okay.
	Years later, as proprietary software sprang up, RMS developed a radical idea of free software.
	Decades later, this concept transformed into open source and would become the birthplace of modern AI. And remember, that was big when Google started to take over the world.
	They open source basically everything, including what?
	The Android operating system, which now this device is hands down more important on a number of issues, data collection, GPS movement, social media interaction, you name it, than a modern day computer.
	Sorry, gotta get that coffee in today, guys.
	Could not fall asleep last night.
	Got like a rough three and a half hours.
	Let's see. It wasn't science fiction, a science fiction writer, but a computer scientist, Alan Turing, and by the way, we could talk about the Turing test, who started the modern AI movement.
	Turing's 1950s paper, Computing Machine and Intelligence, originated the Turing test.
	The test, in brief, states that if a machine can fool you into thinking that you're talking to a human being, it's intelligent.
	Now, I don't know that it's quote-unquote intelligent.
	Really that may be intelligent.
	Conscious, no. no no no no no no no no no. But that's the next cell.
	Bye.
	Okay? And I'm going to show you an example when we get back.
	of the Hollyweird push for acceptance, not only in AI, but robotics and really transhumanism.
	So thumbs it up, subscribe and share, and we'll be back after this word from our sponsor.
	We interrupt today's programming to bring unfortunate news.
	Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
	Don't be fooled. It won't benefit you.
	So take action now.
	The Federal Reserve's phased deployment of FedNow began on July 1, 2023.
	Be prepared. This may catch many off guard and put your hard-earned assets in jeopardy.
	But here's the good news.
	There's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
	Speak to someone at American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
	Dial 833-287-2465.
	This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
	Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
	Call 833, the number two USA Gold.
	Yes, call now.
	833-287-2465.
	Act swiftly. 833-287-2465.
	All right.
	Let's keep it moving here.
	Again, we're going to finish up this article and then we're also going to go to...
	This push, there's this new movie out there.
	I forget what it's called.
	But it's basically all about this robotic, AI, human-looking thing.
	Not that this hasn't been pushed on us for decade upon decade upon decade.
	But the push now is they brought a bunch of people dressed up like the robots over to a baseball game.
	You know, more and more they want to normalize these things, get you prepared for their transhumanist
	vision.
	Okay?
	According to some people, today's AI can already do this.
	I don't agree, but we're clearly on our way.
	In 1960, computer scientist John McCarthy coined the term artificial intelligence and
	along the way created the Lisp language.
	McCarthy's achievement, as computer scientist Paul Graham put it, did for programming something
	like what Uselid did for geometry.
	He showed how, given a handful of simple operators and a notion of functions, you can build a whole programming language.
	Lisp, in which data and code are mixed, became AI's first language.
	It was also RMS's first programming love.
	Let's keep going down here.
	So why didn't we have a GNU chat GPT in the 1980s?
	There are many theories.
	The one I prefer is that early AI had the right ideas in the wrong decade.
	The hardware wasn't up to the challenge.
	Other essential elements like big data weren't yet available to help real AI get underway.
	Open source projects such as Hudop, Spark, and Cassandra provided the tools that AI and machine learning needed for strong...
	Storing and processing large amounts of data on clusters of machines.
	Without this data and quick access to it, large language models, LML, LLMs, couldn't work.
	Now I would argue that although on the surface that's correct, that in various stages underground in these black programs, they obviously worked on these projects.
	Obviously. How far they got, when they got there, I don't know.
	I don't know, but they certainly have the processing power.
	And they certainly had a lot of the data that they didn't want you to know about.
	I mean, when you think about data collection back then, it's not as extreme as it is now.
	But again, if you're naive enough to believe that they didn't have your phone conversations and those type of interactions then and more, again, you're being naive.
	They did on the record.
	Today, even Bill Gates, no fan of open source, admits that open source-based AI is the biggest thing since he was introduced to the idea of a graphical user interface in 1980.
	The GUI! And by the way, a graphic user interface is basically a way to interact with your computer outside of coded language.
	It's what 99.99% of us use.
	Windows is an example of a graphic user interface.
	You open up any program, it has a graphic user interface.
	Okay? That's why back in the day, when you were doing websites, they wanted you to program in HTML. Now that's almost, I mean, gone.
	I mean, there are HTML editors, for sure.
	But... Most people are using graphic user interfaces to do so, to build websites.
	That's all the way back with Dreamweaver and things like that, back in the late 90s, early 2000s.
	Let's see. From the GUI idea, you may recall, Gates built a little program called Windows.
	In particular, today's wildly popular agenerative models such as ChatGPT and Llama2 sprang from open source origins.
	That's not to say ChatGPT, Llama2, or Dolly are open source.
	They are not!
	They are not, but they sure needed that open source stuff to get her going.
	That's why open source is so damn important, man.
	They cut that off, it's going to be a screw job on the rest of us.
	Oh, they were supposed to be.
	As Elon Musk, an early OpenAI investor, said, OpenAI was created as an open source, which is why I named it OpenAI.
	Again, another setup, in my opinion, for Musk to be a hero.
	Musk's like, I don't know what happened!
	He's at the meeting.
	Oh, it was a great conversation.
	I love Chuck Schumer.
	Oh... Let's see.
	Not-for-profit company to serve as a counterweight to Google, but now it has become a closed-source maximum-profit company, effectively controlled by Microsoft.
	Not what I intended at all.
	Sure. Be that as it may, OpenAI and all the other generative AI programs are built on open-source foundations.
	In particular, Hugging Faces Transformer is the top open source library for building today's
	machine learning models. Funny name and all, it provides pre-trained models, architectures,
	and tools for natural language processing tasks. This enables developers to build upon existing
	models and fine-tune them for specific use cases. In particular, Chats GPT relies on
	Hugging Faces library for its GPT large learning models.
	Without Transformer, there is no Chat GPT.
	So remember, these these are massive databases that they're feeding from.
	That's what modern AI really relies on, as much information as it could possibly take in.
	In addition, TensorFlow and PyTorch, developed by Google and Facebook, respectively, FuelChat GPT. These Python frameworks provide essential tools and libraries for building and training deep learning models.
	Needless to say...
	Other open source AI, ML programs are built on top of them.
	For example, Keras, a high-level TensorFlow API, is often used by developers without deep learning backgrounds and to build neural networks.
	Until you're blue in the face to which one is better, and AI programmers do.
	But both TensorFlow and PyTorch are used in multiple projects behind the scenes of your favorite AI chatbot in a mix of different open source projects.
	So once again, guys, I can't reiterate it enough.
	If you don't have access to these, you will not be able to compete.
	But they want to sell you on the idea that there's no way you're going to be able to compete anyway.
	Let us do it.
	Let the elders do it.
	Let us treat you like children.
	And then we'll sell you on the idea that the only way to keep up with the AI and everything is to merge with it.
	Which the Musker Nuts is openly talked about.
	And they're slowly but surely trying to get you way in on it.
	Alright? So, I want to jump ship to this.
	And, you know, the jerseys, I think it's what, Creator?
	What's the name of the damn movie?
	Yes, The Creator.
	Okay? Alright.
	The Creator. And they just roll out the people bots.
	It's the Creator.
	The Creator arrives.
	And you know what? There's this other one I got sent by my buddy Tony where these teenagers are wearing these devices over their brains And I think live streaming, their love affair, their romance to some alien species, and that's like the new form of currency, etc.
	They're just getting you ready for this.
	So here we go.
	Let's play this. During batting practice today, these guys, robots, quote-unquote, dressed up in Padres jerseys, roamed around Petco Park greeting the players and fans.
	These robots are all part of a promotional stunt for the newest sci-fi drama, The Creator.
	Some of them were seen holding umbrellas to protect their wires from the light rain.
	That's a little creepy.
	Yeah, I mean, they had the job.
	I mean, they got the gear in the back of the head, too, so...
	A little creepy?
	Yeah. Yeah.
	But again, they want to normalize that kind of stuff.
	A little creepy? No, no, no.
	It's creepy. Again, I like art.
	I like science fiction.
	But these people are fast-tracking this tech for a reason.
	They're fast-tracking it because right now, they're literally pulling the rug out from us financially and telling us everything's fine.
	Everything's okay.
	Don't you worry.
	You know, I watched the Tuckins piece over in Argentina.
	And when he turns in $100 and he gets a stack of bills like that.
	Like a cinder block thick stack.
	I'm just like, oh my god.
	I mean, you're not...
	Like, you get ones on a $100 bill.
	And you're like...
	I don't know. One's on a hundred.
	Probably can even be squeezed down to that.
	We're talking. But bang.
	One hundred.
	American dollars.
	And by the way, it was very illegal to even exchange it in this place to show what the Argentinian money is actually worth.
	So this is Pete Bootlicker.
	Okay? Talking about how everything's okay.
	And we just don't understand.
	We just don't know it. The American people are financially fine.
	We just don't know it.
	Okay? Mr.
	Transportation Secretary?
	From Rick. The poll, the vast majority of American people are not happy with President Biden's leadership on a range of topics and issues.
	So what do you say to the 44% of Americans who say they are worse off now than they were before Biden took office?
	Well, look, we all know the economic pressure that Americans have felt when the president took office.
	The economy was flat on its back.
	It was flat on its back.
	First of all, the COVID-1984 nightmare did nothing good for the economy.
	And yes, Trump has to share responsibility for that.
	But the idea that this administration didn't continue the insane regulations, make them worse, and flood the economy with more fiat currency and then shut off the power purposely, you know, is ridiculous.
	We're also getting extraordinary results.
	More than 13 million jobs created.
	That's more than any presidential term in American history.
	And yes, it takes a while for people to feel the full benefits of those results, just like it's going to take a while to build all of the infrastructure that we're now underway on with the president's generational infrastructure bill.
	There is no infrastructure.
	You called it an infrastructure bill, and it was the Build Back Better bullshit bill.
	That too many people had seen clips of minions like you saying it.
	And they were like, whoa, what is going on here?
	This seems coordinated.
	This doesn't seem like it's good for me.
	We'll call it infrastructure, but not going to build any infrastructure.
	You know, I've said this again and again and again.
	They were really interested in the type of infrastructure that would empower this country.
	You would have...
	A massive maglev train network being set up outside of cities, you know, basically in suburban type areas, you know, next to bigger cities, closer, but basically where anybody could get access to them, and it would change work forever.
	And you would find something other than concrete to build the roads with.
	That would be a huge infrastructure, but that's not the infrastructure they're talking about.
	They want to bring in everything smart and electric so they get to shut it off when they want to.
	Thumbs it up. Subscribe and share.
	We're about to go to another break.
	When we come back, we're going to come back to the bootlicker himself.
	Again, telling you everything is A-OK. You just don't know it yet.
	PD says you just don't know it yet.
	If you're like me and you want to be prepared for the unexpected...
	That's where the wellness company's emergency medical kit comes in.
	Over 40% of Americans say that they would avoid a doctor or a hospital unless it was a catastrophic situation.
	Medical emergency kits with...
	The kit contains eight potentially life-saving medications for you to keep on hand in the event of natural disasters, supply chain shortages, medical emergencies, or like an apocalyptic situation.
	These are the actual medications that you would need in the event of certain situations.
	So they've got emergency antibiotics, antivirals, antiparasitics, Use that promo code, rvmtwc.health slash rvm.
	Alright, let's go back to little Petey Bootlicker.
	I mean, as establishment, as it gets, checks off the right boxes for the party.
	Got to sit up there.
	He's Mayor Pete!
	I mean, another phony, construct, loser.
	That's what he is.
	Man, you are one pathetic loser.
	Let's continue. He got the bill done after president after president, Congress after Congress, couldn't make it happen.
	He did. We're getting the results on the economy.
	And one other thing that I think is really important is that the American people agree with us and not with congressional Republicans on what to do about it.
	So when you look at the economy, the most important thing in the president's view is to support families and support workers, not just with the job creation that's going on, but lowering costs.
	It's why, for example, Lowering the cost of insulin to $35 for seniors is something that the president pushed for, got, wants to do for all Americans, but congressional Republicans are blocking him.
	We're going to keep pushing on that because in the end, what we are seeking to do versus prioritizing tax cuts for the wealthy, let alone driving this country toward a government shutdown, is not what the American people want to see in response to these conditions.
	So, Joe Biden runs nothing.
	The price of insulin Is totally criminal and has been for a very, very long time.
	Amongst other things, EpiPens, etc.
	Criminal. This is because of the collusion between our government agencies and our politicians and the pharmaceutical companies.
	Alright? That also worked with our government on black programs for mind control.
	It's a fun fact, right?
	They absolutely did that.
	And now they're absolutely on the ultimate form of mind control, constantly, the television.
	You can't get away from big pharma ads if you're watching regular television.
	Impossible to do.
	Impossible. It does not matter what channel you are watching.
	Or what program it is.
	They feel you need to be medicated.
	Okay? So, I mean, the amount of gaslighting on that clip is amazing.
	But it's Petey bootlicking style.
	I've got another one of the bootlicker that we're going to go over.
	I need you to thump.
	We're not even close to 100 thumbs up.
	Up on YouTube, I think we lost like 25 subscribers over the weekend as well.
	Because that happens. The idea of a month-long net gain of subscribers of more than 100, I don't know how long it's been now.
	That's how great the algorithm treats you.
	When techno-fascism is out in the open and we're not open source.
	And the company that was developed via open source, Google, with the don't be evil deal, is now a government contractor and essentially a Trojan horse civilian system for that narrative.
	For that great narrative that they'd like to push via AI and otherwise.
	So, let's see.
	Is this the high gas prices and insulin prices?
	Is this the same exact clip that we just played?
	It was marked differently.
	Let's see. It's probably the same clip.
	Gas prices are on the rise again.
	Gas prices. People look at that.
	No matter what you say about what you are trying to do, they are feeling it.
	They are feeling gas prices.
	They are feeling food prices.
	It's just not breaking through.
	Well, once again, Pete told you everything is going to be more affordable.
	Insulin is more affordable now.
	Doesn't matter, you're paying twice as much for ground beef than you were a couple years ago.
	Doesn't matter that water, I've made this example, bottled water in a jug is like 84 cents, $1.34.
	That's 9% inflation, or they try to say 3% inflation, no.
	The dollar store changed to $1.25.
	That's bare minimum 25%.
	But then the shrinkflation, everything got smaller too.
	Easily looking at 30% to 40% inflation.
	You're tasting at the gas pump.
	This administration, this administration, Joe Biden, don't run it.
	Kamala and Barris, don't run it.
	Okay? That's the deal.
	Because they live their lives.
	They see it every day.
	Which is why we're prioritizing making life easier and more affordable for Americans.
	Again, it's one thing to point to a problem.
	How about gas prices?
	Well, they're down from their peaks.
	They're higher than they were a few weeks ago.
	And the president will continue taking action, not just to make sure that gas prices stay under control, But to make sure that Americans can afford our overall bills.
	And, you know, when you look at a congressional Republican opposition that is literally against...
	Nine out of ten.
	Gas rates, energy prices negatively.
	Nine out of ten. Here, let me take myself out of the shot.
	Nine out of ten. Yeah.
	And do you think that the one out of ten isn't completely out of touch with reality?
	Probably on a lot of those tasty little meds.
	That get promoted so heavily on the magic box.
	Having insulin capped at $35 is against the caps on those out-of-pocket costs.
	Seems more concerned with tax cuts for the wealthy than with actually solving these problems.
	That's when you see the real difference in approach.
	So even if you have agreement on an economic challenge, I love this.
	We're going to make life more affordable.
	We're going to take care of Americans.
	No, you're not. Again, government is not there to be my pappy or my mammy or to take care of me.
	Period. That's not what it's for.
	Alright? It's really supposed to be there to enforce the basic rules and regulations of society.
	And that's about it.
	That's about it.
	We need a military, and we need law enforcement, like I stated earlier, for a number of reasons.
	But we need small and accountable government.
	We don't have it.
	And that's why we've got phonies like Bootlicker here telling you everything's A-OK. Everything's all right.
	The infrastructure is coming.
	The relief is coming.
	The government loves you.
	Other side's talking about a shutdown.
	They're talking about government cuts that would...
	I mean, you want to talk about groceries? They're talking about something that would waitlist families that need access to support to be able to afford to feed their children.
	Gas prices are on...
	I mean, I'm glad that...
	I'm not even sure who this woman is.
	What were the articles we had with Hillary Clinton?
	What is going on here? See, how do we even click that?
	Sorry, Rumble. We don't need any of that.
	We don't need any of that. This is what we're going to be watching, by the way, in the second hour of the program over at rvmrumble.com.
	It's one of those things. Oh, you can get it on YouTube?
	I was trying to download it, and I was not able to download it, but I downloaded it.
	I tried to download the Twitter file.
	I hate it when that happens, but it's been happening.
	Let's hit some more stories down the line.
	And then in the last segment of the first hour, I'm going to show you this clip of Eric Adams talking up the robots and how great they are and how they only cost $9 an hour and they don't need breaks and they don't sleep and they're going to patrol the subway.
	They're going to patrol the subway.
	Everything's a-okay.
	Biden is trolled by dumbfounded observers after getting LL Cool J's name wrong and calling him boy before correcting his mistake.
	Now, here's the thing.
	If this were the other side, it would be everywhere.
	Again, I found this in my morning routine.
	I didn't hear about this.
	It shows he's done.
	LL Cool J, even if you are Joe Biden, and by the way, I was never a big LL Cool J guy.
	Not my thing.
	You know, something like a phenomenon.
	Not my thing.
	Always want a little more substance to my rap.
	Although Mama Said Knock You Out when I was a little, little guy.
	Grade school little guy.
	Huge hit. Couldn't get away from it.
	Pioneer in hip-hop.
	Someone you could not get away from even in my college years a decade plus later.
	Okay? Not to know who LL Cool J is as you try to read off a prompter and get that wrong is one thing.
	Calling him boy is a totally other thing.
	Not young man, and by the way, LL Cool J ain't young.
	In fact, how old is LL? If I had to guess...
	And I know LL transitioned into like a NCS guy.
	I think the guy's got to be 58 to 62.
	58 to 62 Burmese Brigade.
	What's your guess on LL? LL Cool J. And by the way, that stands for Ladies Love Cool James.
	See, I've got him dated. He's 55.
	He's only 11 years older than the Burmese.
	And he got into the entertainment industry really young.
	I mean, really, really, really young.
	Driven guy. 55.
	LL Cool J. There he is.
	Okay? Now, again, Biden can't speak.
	He doesn't know where he is.
	At all. No one wants to acknowledge that.
	In the mainstream media shows you how illegitimate they are.
	It's in the open.
	It was in the open in the beginning.
	They don't want to say he has dementia.
	Remember, they wanted to take Trump out because of his physical prowess.
	Joe Biden's physical prowess hasn't been there since before he got selected and installed.
	There's that aspect of this.
	But they never wanted to confront his outright racism.
	Racial jungle?
	Remember that? Remember the whole Ku Klux Klan guys that were your buddies, Joe?
	Come on.
	And then instead he parades around.
	I ain't kidding. I had to talk with my dad.
	Love is love, Joey, when two men were kissing in like the 50s or 60s.
	Love is love, Joey.
	Just make shit up.
	And then the fantasy land side just accepts it.
	So, here's 15 seconds of Joe Biden, again, not knowing where he is, who he's talking about, okay?
	Where he is, and calling LL Cool J a boy.
	I'm representing the groundbreaking legacy of hip-hop in America.
	LL Cool J, uh...
	It's hilarious! We've got a little dementia patient.
	LLJ Cool J. Let's bring it back.
	They laugh right at him.
	America, LLJ Cool J. By the way, that boy's got, that man's got biceps bigger than my thighs.
	I think he's... He's not a bigot.
	He's not a racist.
	He's not an establishment puppet.
	He's not dementia-ridden.
	Everything's fine.
	Everything's a-okay.
	Hell, they're saying in some polls he could still run against Trump.
	Oh, and by the way, the people behind him have not weaponized Trump.
	The Justice Department and aren't trying to put Trump in jail for not committing enough war crimes and exposing the media military industrial complex.
	That's not happening. Alright, we've got to go to break.
	When we come back, Eric Adams and the New York City police bots after this.
	Attention Americans.
	Breaking news. Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
	Don't be fooled. It won't benefit you.
	Take action now.
	The Federal Reserve phase deployment of FedNow began on July 1, 2023.
	Be prepared. This may catch many off guard.
	Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
	But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
	Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
	Visit ProtectFromBiden.com.
	This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax
	consequences.
	Be smart. Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
	Visit ProtectFromBiden.com to get your free guide and get started.
	Again, that's ProtectFromBiden.com Alright, we are back.
	Final segment of the first hour.
	You can find the second hour free over at rvmrumble.com.
	You want to support the broadcast.
	Haven't plugged once here.
	Again, people are complaining that there's too many commercials and too many plugs.
	We're 45 minutes deep.
	Okay? Probably two and a half minutes of commercials plugged zero times.
	Plugged zero times.
	And the stuff I'm plugging eventually goes free anyway.
	I mean, that's just reality.
	So a couple great interviews.
	Craig Pasta, Giardula.
	If you are a Jimmy Dore fan, you've seen him more and more as he has now become the substitute host for Jimmy Dore.
	And then on top of that, we had Clay Clark on the program talking about Macron, the NWO, globalism, Harari, and I think the Gilgamesh project as well.
	We also talked a little AI and the importance there.
	Once again, all you guys that do support the broadcast, I want to thank you.
	Couldn't do it without you. Those are the paid videos, but a bunch go free.
	Every week, the two weeks prior, they go free over at rvm.com.
	Rumble.com, amongst other places.
	But redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored is where you can support the broadcast.
	Okay, here's the R2-D2 robots, not the robot dogs, that are going to be coming into the New York City subway.
	And look how happy, look how happy Eric Adams is.
	He can't wait....which never sleeps.
	It turns out neither do these new police robots you see when they're on your screen.
	It's called K5. It's soon going to start patrolling the city's busiest subway stations overnight to try and keep New Yorkers safe.
	Mayor Eric Adams insists it is cost-effective.
	Listen. We're not buying, we're leasing.
	$9 an hour.
	$9 an hour.
	This is below minimum wage.
	So here's the next thing.
	We're not buying.
	We're leasing.
	We're not buying.
	We're leasing.
	So it's a perpetual payday.
	We never actually own this stuff.
	The taxpayers never own it.
	But at the same time, we're undercutting law enforcement and their pay.
	Look how happy and smug they are.
	$9 an hour!
	Nine dollars an hour.
	This is below minimum wage.
	You know, no bathroom breaks.
	No meal breaks.
	This is a good investment.
	No bathroom breaks.
	That's something. Let's hope they work better than the delivery, food delivery robots.
	See, let's see. We got artificial intelligence, RoboCop.
	How far can we be from Terminator?
	Not terribly far.
	I hope we're far. Hey, thanks for- No, we're not.
	The super soldier thing is a real thing, and Lord knows.
	And when we're talking about Terminator, I mean, in a lot of respects, yeah, it doesn't look like Arnold Schwarzenegger, and it's not humanoid, but it doesn't have to be.
	We've already had AI drone kills.
	Small drones find their target and kill them automatically.
	That's not enough? Okay.
	Okay. If you say so, that's not enough.
	Okay. Oh!
	A few more stories I did want to hit up.
	Rupert Murdoch steps down the controversial legacy of the media baron.
	The publications and channels owned by the magnate have been under scrutiny for years for allegedly trying to wield political influence, you don't say.
	Especially in the United States and Australia.
	It's well beyond that. Look, Murdoch's 92.
	Okay. This is all I'm going to say about it because I've never lionized Rupert Murdoch.
	I've always been a critic.
	Never said, wow, Fox News is the best.
	This is the lesson to take away from this.
	Nobody gets out alive.
	One run. You get one run.
	One shot at the title.
	Eventually that run ends.
	What will your legacy be?
	Will you bootlick guys like Rupert Murdoch?
	Will you aggrandize them in their behavior?
	Will you try to fight their narrative when it is untrue?
	I mean, your life is yours, man.
	What are your values?
	What's important to you?
	And to me...
	This just illustrates...
	And by the way... Who knows?
	Murdoch could live another decade.
	A lot of these people do. Got the best medical attention in the world.
	Comes from a separate generation.
	Where the food wasn't as bad.
	It wasn't a bibbidi-boobidi-bobbidi-boobidis.
	Everywhere. So...
	Who knows? Who knows?
	But... At the same time...
	He's no longer running Fox News.
	I don't know that it's going to change the network at all.
	In fact... I'd be shocked if it changed really anything.
	But, gotta cover it.
	Gotta cover it. Organ transplant breakthrough as pig's kidney survives in body of brain dead man for two months.
	Alright? And I guess it was inside Maurice Miller for 61 days.
	This is that xenotransplantation that we've talked about.
	Genetically modifying pigs and other animals, but pigs in particular.
	And this has got FDA approval, okay, so that they can be used for transplant.
	Now, a lot of people will say, hey, this is empowering humanity.
	Maybe. This is NYU is where they do it.
	Let's just show it to you because it's hard to believe these things, but...
	Xenotransplantation. And this is a...
	This is a...
	Martin Rothblatt program.
	Xenotransplantation. FDA approval.
	And there it is.
	Pig Hearts for Humans.
	The FDA Bill of Health.
	There's... I mean, this is all FDA.gov.
	There's the whole website on it.
	On Xenotransplantation.
	Oh, you're going to get a PDF file, huh?
	What do we got? 37 pages on it?
	Yeah. Xenotransplantation, immunosuppression, and the prospects for tolerance.
	Harvard! Yes.
	Yes, the good old people at Harvard.
	So this is Massachusetts General and a Harvard study on it.
	Once again, I mean, let's go to the news.
	It couldn't have been that long ago that they got it.
	Let's see. Pig kidney xenotransplants proved successful in two brain-dead men.
	So they're rolling this out.
	They're rolling it out.
	Get ready to have a pig organ.
	And again, I'm not against saving people's lives.
	I'm not against medical breakthroughs.
	But who is going to have access to this stuff?
	Is it going to be you and yours?
	I'd caution otherwise that it does not appear to be that way.
	But that's just me. Maybe I'm wrong.
	Maybe I'm wrong. So, Trump dodges threat states resist 14th Amendment ballot ban push, but they are pushing it.
	Okay, here it is right here.
	Judge overseeing case to remove Trump from ballot agrees to order banning threats and intimidation.
	So, people pay attention.
	The Colorado judge overseeing the first significant lawsuit to bar former President Trump from the state's 2024 presidential ballot on Friday issued a protective order prohibiting threats and intimidation in the case saying the safety of those involved, including herself and her staff, was necessary as the groundbreaking litigation moves forward.
	They're going to try to ban him from being on the ballots and put him in jail.
	I 100% understand everybody's concerns for the parties, the lawyers, and frankly, myself and my staff.
	Based on what we've seen in other cases, Judge Sarah B. Wallace said as she agreed to the protective order.
	This is totally and completely insane.
	Totally and... Got my dog whining outside.
	Hold on one second. Maybe we'll end up after the first break into the second hour grabbing one of those pasta jar doula clips and playing that for a moment so I can quickly let my doggins out.
	In fact, that's what we'll probably be doing.
	So that means I've got to get that ready.
	We'll do it live. That's how we do it here.
	We do it live.
	While we do it live, let's hit another story.
	This one's a fun one.
	It's the feel-good story of the year.
	It really shows you where these people's allegiances lie.
	Like it's, it's too much, man.
	It's too much when you see this stuff.
	They're honoring World War II veterans, right?
	Honoring World War II veterans and people like Trudeau and Zelensky, which is proper.
	There he is. There he is.
	He apologized for recognizing a man who allegedly fought for the Nazi SS during World War II. There he is.
	Anthony Rota had hailed 98-year-old Yaroslav Hunka above as a Ukrainian-Canadian war veteran from the Second World War who fought for Ukrainian independence against the Russians and a Ukrainian hero and a Canadian hero.
	Fought against the Russians.
	So they knew he was a Nazi.
	Like, again, we're in the dark cartoon.
	We're in the dark cartoon.
	We got literal Nazis there now.
	And there's Trudeau.
	And there's Zelensky.
	And there's shaking hands.
	Come on, guys. Give me a break.
	It's just ridiculous.
	But, again, this is what we've put up with.
	This is what we've put up with.
	Is this? Yes, here we go.
	So, uh... Thomas Massey, again, really, really love him.
	This week, Rand Paul and I met with delegation from the Australian Parliament to discuss getting justice for Julian Assange.
	It is my strong belief he should be free to return home.
	Yes, he should be taken out of Belmarsh.
	He should no longer be tortured, believe it or not.
	The torture should end.
	Okay? And then...
	And then anybody that went after him and plotted to kill him should also be prosecuted.
	Including people within our own government.
	For some accountability.
	Because you don't do that to journalists.
	Because it sets an awful authoritarian precedent.
	One that we're tasting and feeling now more than ever.
	More than ever.
	Okay, let's see.
	What we got here?
	Oh yeah. And by the way, this is from 2012, but I always want to remind people this, that it's the CIA and those three-letter intelligence agencies that have just their fingerprints all over the drug trade.
	All over the drug trade.
	Okay? All over it.
	We're going to go to break. We're going to come back for just a moment over to YouTube and let you know where you can watch this.
	Second hour, rvmrumble.com.
	And yeah, get yourself a pillow with the promo code RBM. When I invented MyPillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you.
	And 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going.
	Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
	To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition MyPillow.
	The Giza Elegance MyPillow is made with my patented adjustable fill, the most amazing cotton, and a two-inch pipe cusset.
	It has four custom loft levels, machine washable and driable, and you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
	Go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
	Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary MyPillow queen size.
	Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
	That's right, get a queen size MyPillow for only $19.98.
	From all of us here at MyPillow, it's America!
	All right, everybody. If you're watching this on YouTube, go over to rvmrumble.com.
	It's not about left or right. It's about right and wrong.
	I've got that whole doctor thing.
	I've got the AI governance clips.
	And we're going to do a little of the pasta premium to kick it off so I can let the doggins out.
	Again, rvmrumble.com, YouTube.
	Okay, with that being said, we've now left them.
	And I'm going to give you a couple of clips.
	We were talking about Trump, talking about prison.
	Now we're talking about Trump prison civil war with Craig Pasta Giardula.
	I've been asking the question to people that are in delusional town that think that somehow they're not putting Trump in prison.
	So I posit the question.
	When they put Trump in prison, let's just go to that world.
	Okay, somehow he doesn't beat it.
	Somehow they rig it. What happens next?
	And often you hear the men in this country, Civil War.
	I got that answer from Joe Hoft of the Gateway Pundit.
	I got that answer from Chris Skye of Canada.
	I don't think that's actually possible.
	And let me explain why. But I'm not saying they wouldn't love to frame it up that way.
	What would we have? So let's talk about the Civil War.
	I looked it up.
	We did it live.
	We'll do it live. We did it live.
	We'll do it live! Fuck it!
	Do it live! I'll write it and we'll do it live!
	Thank you, Bill. We will.
	So, basically, classic piece right there.
	It is. I looked it up.
	And 1860, 1870, how many people are in the United States?
	At that time or now?
	Yes. No, no, then. I'm going to say 100 million.
	Not even close. Not even ballpark.
	So you're actually about 30 million, and you recently had an immigration of about 5 million.
	Now, of that, you had about 10% fighting, like 3 million.
	Remember, about a million people do die in the Civil War.
	So you're talking about less than about 10% fighting.
	Now, that's a huge demographic.
	Secondly, travel is much different.
	Yeah. Not only is travel, but the weapon systems that the government had and the military had were the same as the people, okay?
	So they would love to set off small, little, isolated riots and whatnot, like Proud Boys and Antifa, the narratives they've had, where you're really just involving maybe a few thousand people, right?
	Frame that up as a civil war for martial law and just pick off...
	They're political enemies for thought crimes or associations, etc.
	There would never be an actual civil war.
	And I make this point. Had everybody in that crowd on January 6th been armed, went in there, actually caused a quote-unquote insurrection, actually took lives, like killed people in the Senate and Congress, etc., taken over that building, does anybody think they ran the country after that?
	Does anybody think...
	We did it!
	Woo! Number one!
	No, let me tell you what happens.
	Okay? Within 48 hours...
	That entire place is swept by the military, special forces, or some kind of hired mercenary group.
	You might even have the excuse to bring in NATO and the United Nations and say the United States has just gotten out of control and subjugate even more power to a foreign body.
	You get nothing good.
	You get no real insurrection.
	So... There is no chance at an actual civil war.
	There is a chance for us to fight and kill each other and that to be portrayed as they round people up, in my opinion, and make things much, much worse.
	That would be the end of the country.
	I mean, beyond the Banana Republic we're talking about.
	Yeah, I think you are hitting it on the nose.
	And I think they would like nothing more than that in some ways because then they can, you know, enact their martial law, throw things down, you know, and just lead us more into more tyranny, you know, less civil liberties.
	Get the whole story on Red Voice Media Premium using the link below completely uncensored and head-free.
	Redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored to watch that full hour.
	We may be able to go to one more clip of Jardula a little bit later.
	Remember that as part of the premium.
	But again, we give away all the premium for free a couple weeks later.
	So you want to support the broadcast?
	Redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	Everybody who signs up really does matter.
	And it makes a huge difference for the broadcast.
	I can promise you that.
	Okay. This is an extremely important story because if half of what this guy is saying is true, it shows not, in my opinion, that these guys did this accidentally, guys, gals, institutions.
	But this is malice.
	This is utter, in-your-face malice.
	And I'm going to contest that right out of the gates, the hate and lie shots did nothing to keep people alive or keep them out of hospitals.
	I think that's a total misnomer.
	I think that part and opening up that way, even if it's just to stay safe, is a bad idea.
	I just want to point that out there.
	For those of you who don't know me, my name is...
	Man, see, now you're going to watch me do it live.
	See how low that is?
	And that's...
	So, a little bit of...
	Let's download it live.
	Show you how the sausage is made.
	What am I doing here? So we can at least up the volume to a decent level.
	A little site called 9convert on the YouTubins.
	Okay, 9convert.com.
	We'll do a little less...
	Luckily, we have some great internet here.
	It's under 80 megabytes.
	We'll even save link as.
	Look at that, right-clicking, using a graphic user interface, everybody.
	Boom! And it's just about downloaded.
	Great. We've got that.
	Do some of this.
	And now, South Carolina Senate hearing, USC professor Philip Buchholz.
	So a little bit of what am I doing here?
	For those of you who don't know me, my name is Philip Buchholz.
	I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology.
	I'm a cancer gene jock.
	Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina.
	And what that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get fussed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't.
	So technically, that means that I'm very, very skilled in the art of DNA sequencing.
	I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for.
	And I'm also pretty good, when I say I, I mean the people in my laboratory.
	You're not going to hear their names, but there's a group of people that do this excellent work.
	We're really good at detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're real low levels.
	And we used those skills during the pandemic to...
	We invented the COVID test that many of you did to spit test.
	Okay, that came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff.
	So once again, I think there's huge flaws with the testing.
	I'm using this as an illustration because this is somebody that's on the inside.
	And again, this is somebody that, in my opinion, is much too forgiving.
	But starts talking about the plasmid DNA that should not be there.
	Alright? That may actually merge with and become part of your DNA. Which they promised it never would and I laughed at people.
	MRNA technology and all.
	I mean, come on. Just...
	Let's grow up.
	So, I mean, this guy, again...
	What he says is absolutely stunning...
	Earned a fair amount of respect in the state of South Carolina and in this body because we did a ton of COVID testing in the middle of the night when people were afraid and we told them no you don't have COVID in your home or yes you do.
	So my qualifications to comment on this are both technical and kind of relational in the state of South Carolina.
	I'll cut to a very narrow theme here, but it does touch on lots of these regulatory issues.
	And I'll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to.
	I'll try to stay in this narrow lane of some problems in the Pfizer vaccine as a case study for places in which regulatory oversight could be improved.
	First of all, let me say that my interpretation of the literature is that the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people from dying, but it did a terrible job of stopping the pandemic.
	The early publications showed that...
	Again, I don't think it helped at all.
	So I'm just pointing out there that I would be remiss if I didn't step in and say, hey, I disagree with this guy, you know, on that level.
	Um... It stopped infection, but that only lasted for like a month.
	Dr. Burkhardt, could you pull the mic a little closer to you?
	Staff's telling me they're having trouble getting you on the recording.
	Okay. Okay, thank you. In my professional evaluation of the literature, the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people out of the cemetery, but it sucked at stopping the pandemic.
	And it was the best of sucky options that we had.
	And I still believe that...
	Again, totally disagree.
	We had the option to treat it with ivermectin, budesonide, hydroxychloroquine, intravenous vitamins, etc., etc.
	A ton of options. It was deployed mostly in good faith, but there were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire and we could do a better job next time from the lessons that we're going to learn here.
	That's my own personal view of this.
	Not my personal view.
	Not mine. But I'm also, my philosophical bent here is, I'm sure many of you have heard of Occam's Razor, right?
	Choose the simplest of explanations.
	Well, there's another one called Hanlon's Razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence.
	And so, I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances.
	There could be malice underneath, but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious.
	That's key. There could be...
	No, there's 100% malice here.
	Damn well knew what they were doing.
	And by the way, I want to give a big shout out to a cult priestess.
	I just went over to Rockfin, saw that she tipped out.
	She said, Jason, please see my reporting.
	I dealt with Russell Brand in Los Angeles for several years.
	Thank you. The short version.
	And there is a Rockfin, Russell Brand...
	A cult priestess who's been a fan of the show has always warned me about Brand and she has never been a fan of Brand.
	I just want to point that out. The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA.
	It's got bits of DNA in it.
	This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA.
	I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab.
	The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial.
	So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials.
	Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them.
	He gave them all to me and I looked at them.
	We had two batches that were given out here in Columbia and I checked these two batches and I checked them by sequencing.
	And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine, and I can see what's in there.
	And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there.
	Uh-oh! Surprising there's any DNA in there.
	Why is there DNA in there?
	And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there, and I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there.
	So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest.
	There's a lot of cases now of people having suspicious death after vaccine.
	It's hard to prove what caused it.
	It's just, you know, temporally associated.
	That's the malice.
	Of course it's hard to prove what caused it.
	That's the point. That's the baked in plausible deniability.
	Same thing with this idea that somehow there wasn't malice in DNA in shots that were filled with hate and lies.
	And this DNA is a plausible mechanism.
	This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix.
	This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time.
	We take pieces of DNA and we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in.
	We pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell.
	It's not just a temporary...
	Permanent fixture of the cell.
	How many times they assure you with their hate and their lies and their Bernaysian talking points there was nothing permanent about it?
	A temporary thing.
	It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore.
	Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine.
	It's different from RNA because it can be permanent.
	This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and it could cause, theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue.
	It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people, depending on where in the genome this If a foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an oncogene.
	I think it'll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not.
	You gotta love that!
	Oh, it's not gonna fight the tumor off anymore?
	It's gonna program it the other way?
	Yikes! And again, the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse.
	I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is.
	That's my bag. I know this is a thing, and it is a possibility.
	Okay, a little nerdy science here.
	The central dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA, okay?
	And then RNA gets translated into protein.
	This is just how life runs.
	Why does this matter?
	Well DNA, for the purposes of this discussion, DNA is a long-lived information storage device.
	What you were born with, you're going to die with and pass on to your kids.
	DNA lasts for hundreds of thousands of years, and it can last for generations if you pass it on to your kids.
	So alterations to the DNA, they stick around.
	RNA, by its nature, is temporary.
	It doesn't last.
	And that feature of RNA was part of the sales pitch for the vaccine.
	The pseudouridine was supposed to make the RNA last a little bit longer, but still, it's a transient phenomenon.
	We're talking hours to days.
	And then proteins. Once proteins are made, they also don't last forever.
	They last for hours to days.
	But something that makes its way into DNA has the potential to last for a very long time, maybe a lifetime.
	So this is a picture of the sequencing run that I did in the lab from a couple of batches of the Pfizer vaccine.
	And all those little bitty lines here are the little tiny pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine.
	They don't belong there.
	They are not part of the sales pitch or the marketing campaign.
	And they're there. There's a lot of them.
	This little graph here in the middle is the size distribution that peaks around.
	There's a lot of them!
	They're not supposed to be there!
	100 base pairs, 120 base pairs.
	So the DNA pieces that are in the vaccine are short little pieces, 100, 120.
	There's some that are about 500 base pairs, a few that are even 5,000, but most of them are around 100 base pairs.
	Why is this important?
	Because the probability of a piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size.
	So your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are.
	So it's like, you know, if you shoot a shotgun at a washboard, if you shoot a slug, you have some probability of hitting it.
	And if you shoot buckshot, you have a bigger probability of hitting it with some shot, right?
	All these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine are analogous to buckshot.
	So what he's trying to explain to you is, like, this is a multi-attack pattern.
	Attack, attack, attack, attack, attack, attack, attack.
	It's not just one attack.
	Like, you know, boom.
	No, it's everywhere.
	It's got a better probability of effing you and yours up.
	You have many, many thousands of opportunities to modify a cell of a vaccinated person.
	The pieces are very small because during the process, they chopped them up to try to make them go away, but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in the process.
	That's how this got here.
	In my view, somebody should go about sequencing DNA samples from stem cells of people who are vaccinated and find out if this theoretical risk has happened or not.
	I think this is a real serious oversight, regulatory oversight, that happened at the federal level, and somebody should force this to happen somewhere.
	Good luck.
	Not only do these people have protection, but we know how slowly the wheels turn in any type of accountability.
	And this would be scientific accountability on another level.
	And once again, this guy is trying to say what?
	If you can attribute incompetence, don't attribute malice.
	I'm attributing malice.
	Are you capable of doing that?
	Yeah, we do that kind of thing.
	But in order for it to be trustworthy by the public, this has to be done by lots of people.
	I'll talk to you more about that later.
	Yeah, this is our deal.
	This is why I know this should have been done at the federal level.
	So we took all these pieces of DNA and we used them To glue together what the source DNA must have been.
	Again, this is what we do in the lab all the time.
	And all these little red and green lines here, these are all independent little pieces of DNA. This must have had 100,000 pieces of DNA in this sequencing run.
	And you can put them all back together and see It's clear they did this.
	It's clear they did this. It's clear they did this.
	Oops, must have been an accident.
	In vitro transcription, where you feed an RNA polymerase this plasmid, and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies for you.
	And then you take this mRNA, you mix it with the lipid nanoparticle transfection reagent, and now you've got your mRNA vaccine, but they failed to get the DNA out before they did this.
	So these little pieces, they did make some effort to chop it up, so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the RNA. That's clear as day what happened just from the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing.
	A little bit of a regulatory note here.
	The way you do RNA transcription, in vitro transcription reactions, you have to give it a DNA template.
	Okay? And you can give it a DNA template that is just a synthetic piece of DNA that is only the instructions to make the RNA And that's what was done for getting the emergency use authorization and the clinical trial.
	It's called process one, if you look up that kind of stuff.
	They made a PCR product of just the bits that they wanted, and then they did the in vitro transcription, made a bunch of RNA of that.
	There was no plasma DNA to contaminate the stuff that was used for the trial.
	But making that PCR product doesn't scale the way that was necessary to vaccinate the whole world.
	So a cheaper way to scale up the production of this template is to clone that PCR product into this plasmid vector, put the plasmid vector into bacteria, and then you can grow up big vats of the bacteria.
	They make a lot of the plasmid DNA for you.
	Then you use that plasmid DNA as the template to drive this transcription reaction to make your RNA. And that's how the contamination ended up in the production batches, even though it was not in the stuff that was used for the authorization trials.
	So, to me, again, this shows you they purposely manufactured the product in that manner.
	And that they purposely did not do so during the trials that were already rigged.
	This is malice.
	This is malfeasance.
	This is not, you know, again, incompetence, ineptitude.
	Dude, no, I'm sorry.
	So I know it's a little bit of nerdy science, but it has regulatory implications for you guys.
	We can measure the quantity of this stuff We can we can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty
	easy in the lab This is we're good at doing this kind of stuff
	this is the same we made a little PC a colleague of mine at MIT made you know from who used to work for the
	the Broad Institute at MIT he he made a little PCR test and we cloned it here
	This is similar to the PCR test that you all took for the spit test.
	Same idea and same expertise behind it.
	And we can quantify exactly how much of this stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue.
	And, you know, I estimate that there were about two billion copies of the one piece that we're looking for in every dose.
	And if you look back at that map I showed you where it's all these little – the little piece that we're looking for is just that little bit right there, okay?
	But if you see 2 billion copies of this, there's about 200 billion of everything else.
	So what this means is that there's probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasma DNA in each dose of the vaccine.
	200 billion pieces of plasmid DNA with every single dose.
	One dose, two dose, three dose, four dose, five dose, six dose.
	Boosty McBoost.
	Just saw a commercial last night of the update.
	One of the ways that you can protect yourself.
	That's the new language. One of the ways...
	Get up to date on your new Boosty McBoost.
	200 billion pieces of plasmid DNA inside the lipid nanoparticles that what?
	Pass through the blood-brain barrier.
	Wow! And it's encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle so it's ready to be delivered inside the cell.
	Okay? This is a bad idea.
	My conclusions from this, we should check a bunch of people.
	We should check a bunch of vaccinated people getting tissue samples Especially if we focus on harmed people, but that's not necessary.
	We could also just focus on regular unharmed people and see if this plasmid DNA is integrating into the genomes of any of their stem cells.
	First of all, it should be across the board.
	Harmed and unharmed.
	Because, once again, it's not like cancer can't take a long time.
	And even those who are unharmed, if you change their DNA... And you did so by lying about it.
	It is malice.
	It is malfeasance.
	It is not an accident.
	It leaves a calling card that is there.
	One of the reasons why I'm focusing on this is because it's kind of different from a lot of the other imagined harms where you can't really prove it.
	You can be suspicious because of the timing, but you can't really prove it.
	This one you can prove it because it leaves a calling card.
	Okay. You find it in the stem cells of harmed people.
	It's equivalent to finding a certain type of lid in someone who is now dead.
	It's pretty reasonable to assume that that's what caused it.
	The royal we, meaning you guys, should insist that the FDA force Pfizer to get the DNA out of the booster and all future versions of this vaccine.
	I'm a real fan of this platform, okay?
	I think it has the potential to treat cancers.
	I really...
	And remember, that's the whole cancer moonshot thing.
	And I think this guy is being incredibly naive.
	But again, as far as the technology itself, yeah.
	Empower and slave.
	It probably does have that potential.
	But is that going to be unleashed for the general populace?
	No. No, no, no.
	Instead, it's going to be suppressed to the general populace, as we're experimented on with shit like this.
	Believe that this platform is revolutionary and in your lifetime there will be mRNA vaccines against antigens in your unique cancer.
	Okay? But they got to get this problem fixed.
	Okay? And right now I think the financial incentives are too great to just keep on rolling with it and it's going to take some encouragement to get it out.
	The regulation that allowed this DNA to be there in the first place.
	I don't think that the amounts there actually exceed the regulation limits.
	In some batches it may.
	In the two batches that I looked at, one of them it was just under the limit and one it was just over the limit.
	My colleague in Boston has looked at a fair number of other batches and there's a handful that are super high and there's a handful that are super low.
	And to me, That is the part of the quote-unquote experiment.
	Because they already know what this is going to do to a large majority of people.
	But they want to see concentration levels.
	But the fact that there is a regulatory threshold for amount of DNA allowed in a vaccine...
	Is a throwback to an era when we were talking about vaccines that were like a recombinant protein or a dead virus, you know, attenuated virus produced in CHO cells or something like that.
	And the DNA that might be in it is naked DNA. And you might have a little bit in the vaccine.
	That's not a problem because naked DNA gets chewed up immediately upon vaccination and there's no real mechanism for it to get inside the cells.
	They inappropriately applied that regulatory limit to this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle.
	It's basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell.
	So once again, Baked in regulatory measures that allow it.
	And you can sit here and act like, we just didn't know!
	Bullshit. We just didn't know!
	No. Not buying it.
	So, I'm thinking Hanlon's razor here, okay?
	I don't think there was anything nefarious here.
	I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight.
	And it's going to take, because the financial incentives are so great to just, you know, sweep it under the rug, and the career incentives of people that approve this are going to be, there's nothing wrong here, you know?
	It's going to take some encouragement to make people prove that it's okay.
	So again, he's just also hinting at how corrupt the system is and how people will protect themselves and how the financial incentives may keep us away from the truth.
	It goes on for another...
	It's about halfway through.
	But I really wanted to get into the global AI governance.
	And before we do that, I wanted to bring up...
	This clip in the very beginning of Invisible Empire where I basically show high-level political officials openly using the terminology and discussing the quote-unquote New World Order.
	And this is David Cameron.
	The world that maybe some people dreamt of at that conference back in Bournemouth when it looked as if maybe history would end, that liberal democracy would triumph, that free market economics would slowly progress, and we'd have a new world order.
	There's John Kerry.
	And together they helped to create, were the principal leaders in creating,
	a new world order and a winning strategy in the Cold War.
	We are part of a new world order.
	And as the recently departed Admiral William J. Crow once said, it's long on new and it's short on order.
	Wolfowitz, another one of these guys?
	Walter Isaacson wrote a wonderful book about some of the wise men who helped shape the
	new world order following the second world war.
	As we devise a way forward in Iraq, I urge the international community to embrace its
	responsibility for creating that new world order.
	Thank you.
	a new world order based upon collective action.
	The transatlantic partnership was never just the foundation of our security.
	you It was the foundation of our way of life.
	It was forged an experience of the most bitter and anguished kind.
	Out of it came a new Europe, a new world order, a new consensus as to how life should and could be lived.
	Wesley Clark. I think Wesley Clark's actually the last one.
	But the reason I said that is because two of those people are part of this bad boy.
	Right here, Tony Blair. And...
	Hello, everyone.
	Great to see you. I thought when I first saw that that was David Cameron next to him.
	But there's Blair.
	And it is at Chatham House.
	And this is what?
	Global AI governance and the UK's role in it.
	Let me repeat that. Global AI governance and the UK's role in it.
	Absolutely packed.
	Very warm welcome to the many many people joining us online.
	Well, I'm very pleased to welcome you to this session on global AI governance.
	What is the UK role?
	And we are going to be talking about the UK, but the questions go much, much wider.
	I'm Bronwyn Maddox, the director, if we haven't met.
	And I can't think, seriously, of a better trio of people, I'm not even going to call you a panel, to come to assemble to talk about these things today.
	We're doing this in partnership with Microsoft and the Tony Blair Institute.
	Oh, the good people at Microsoft.
	And they want global AI. I'm sure there's no conflict of interest there with OpenMind.
	Again, the great narrative, everybody.
	Global AI governance in partnership with Microsoft.
	And very glad to have worked with them both on this event and with Microsoft on many questions of research and convening ahead of the UK's summit that the Prime Minister has called to discuss AI and governance later this year in the autumn.
	So thank you very much indeed for that.
	Before I introduce the trio, we're just going to have a short video from Chloe Smith, the Secretary of State, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology.
	The new formulations of this white hole machinery always catch me out.
	And she's going to speak to us for a few minutes, particularly about the plans that the government has for that summit.
	And then we're going into our discussion.
	So if we can have that.
	If we can have that now.
	What I like about it is that the symbol of royalty, the queen, is right behind her.
	That's great. It's about two months old.
	So this took place after the queen's passing.
	Global AI governance.
	The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change and Chatham House for holding these valuable discussions in the run-up to the UK's hosting of the Global AI Safety Summit.
	The questions to which we're seeking answers today about how we govern and regulate AI could not be more pertinent nor more pressing.
	Artificial intelligence is no longer the stuff of science fiction.
	It's here in our pockets, our cars, our offices, our hospitals and our homes.
	Its adoption is arguably no less significant than the groundbreaking inventions of the battery, the microchip or the World Wide Web.
	AI is fast becoming part of our daily lives and will continue to become even more integral to our economy and our society as this technology rapidly advances.
	The government has long recognised its transformative potential, and we've sought to be ahead of the curve.
	That's evidenced in the £2.5 billion we've invested since 2014 in building a thriving AI ecosystem, and the AI sector deal that we announced all the way back in 2018, which we backed up with the national AI strategy three years later.
	Fast forward to the here and now, and the UK is at the very forefront of AI, not just in its application, but in its governance as well.
	The Prime Minister couldn't have been clearer when he set out our national ambitions on artificial intelligence earlier this month.
	To lead at home.
	To lead abroad.
	To lead change in our public services.
	We're fulfilling those ambitions, starting with our AI white paper.
	It shows how we intend to address AI's inherent risks, but also create a regulatory environment which fosters innovation and growth.
	Bullshit. Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
	It's to regulate it under your vision.
	That's why I said he, she, they.
	They all want the regulation, but now they want AI governance?
	They want the same globalist players at the helm?
	No thank you.
	I know I thank you.
	It advocates a proportionate and agile approach, recognizing the need for a regime that can keep pace with the rapid way in which AI is advancing.
	We recognize as well that when it comes to AI governance, the government cannot and should not go it alone.
	That's one of the reasons why we've established the Foundation Model Task Force to drive UK capabilities so that we can be standard bearers for the safe development and deployment of AI. And I'm delighted that we recently announced Ian Hogarth as the chair of that Foundation Model Task Force.
	As an esteemed entrepreneur, investor and the co-author of the annual State of AI report, Ian brings a wealth of knowledge to the role.
	Under his stewardship, the task force will focus on navigating the complex challenges posed by Frontier AI, bringing together expertise right across government, industry and academia.
	It will collaborate closely with leading tech AI companies like Google DeepMind, OpenAI and Anthropic, who have agreed to share access to their models for safety research.
	So once again, this is behind-the-scenes collusion with governments and their Trojan horse civilian system tech companies.
	It's the definition of techno-fascism.
	And let me just say something about, again, the unimpressive nature of these people.
	This woman essentially put together a YouTube diatribe with jump cuts.
	Could not speak for five minutes in a row eloquently on the subject on her own.
	No, has the jump cuts.
	Couldn't be bothered with putting up graphics in between to make it look a little smoother.
	I know you don't get everything right on the first take.
	But no, jump cuts.
	We've said all along that this has to be an international effort, and it's one that we're proud to lead.
	We've been engaging with international bodies, including the Council of Europe, the G7 and the Global Partnership for AI, and the OECD. And we've committed to working hand-in-hand with our partners in the U.S. through the Atlantic Declaration that the Prime Minister recently agreed with President Biden.
	I mean, that should tell you everything.
	Recently agreed with President Biden?
	On what? On what?
	That he should definitely be wearing diapers all the time?
	Did they agree on that?
	Did they agree on his dementia?
	Perhaps they agreed on that boy's biceps, do I say.
	Like, what are you talking about?
	As I mentioned earlier, the UK has also committed to holding the first major global summit on AI safety this autumn, assembling partners from across the globe to consider the risks of AI, including frontier systems, so that we can overcome these challenges together.
	The summit will consider AI risks and discuss how they can be mitigated through internationally coordinated action.
	That will help to ensure that AI develops and is applied safely, not just here but around the world.
	That its benefits are fully realised tomorrow because of the guardrails we put in place today.
	By effectively addressing the risks, we can seize the many opportunities that AI has to
	offer.
	From transforming our NHS with the discovery of new drugs, new treatments and new ways
	of supporting patients, to helping us race ahead to net zero and build a greener, fairer,
	more efficient economy.
	They tell you. If it's about the green and the net zero agenda, it's about death.
	There's no such thing as net zero.
	That's not real.
	It's never been real.
	It's Bernaysian bullshit.
	Okay? Bernaysian bullshit.
	And if you don't think that that's going to be projected by their artificial intelligence, you're not paying attention.
	In that sense, the conversation on AI is not just a technical one.
	It's a social one.
	A cultural one. It asks us to reconsider our relationship with technology and to imagine the kind of future we want to build with it.
	But we can only do that by working together.
	Indeed, Tony Blair's and William Hague's comprehensive report, A New National Purpose, is compelling in the way it sets out the true promise of this technology and the need for the UK to remain at the forefront of the AI revolution.
	We're listening to some of the most valued voices in tech, like Baroness Lane Fox, who knows from first-hand experience how businesses can use technology to innovate, grow and rapidly expand.
	And we're working with our partners in academia and in world-renowned think tanks like Chatham House to ensure that the views of leading experts and thinkers on AI are placed at the heart of this debate.
	Michelle Donilon and I want all of you to be part of this journey because together we can ensure that artificial intelligence helps us realize not just a more prosperous, more dynamic economy, but a stronger country and ultimately a better world.
	Thank you. Thank you for playing that.
	Thank you very much, Chloe Smith, for giving it.
	I can't fire questions at her, so we're going to go straight into this discussion.
	Well, let me briefly introduce, though they need very little introduction, Brad Smith, President of Microsoft, who I think you said it was the 18th country where you're bringing some of these themes, that has written and spoken very widely for Microsoft and for the industry about these questions.
	and you may have come across his book, Tools and Weapons on the Promises and
	Threats of the Digital Age, and indeed the podcast of the same name. Tony Blair,
	former Prime Minister, also of the Tony Blair Institute, and I'm really struck at
	how Tony Blair and the Institute, which has dedicated itself to governance and
	leadership, has seized this subject and been right out in the front on it.
	And Martha Lane Fox, a peer, President of the British Chamber of Commerce, a leading
	figure in the UK and international tech industry, and also we were discussing
	earlier other things, not only a former director of Twitter but Chancellor of
	the Open University and co-founder and chair of Lucky Voice.
	Did you just hear Twitter in there?
	Did I just hear Twitter?
	Hold on. International tech industry, and also, we were discussing earlier, other things.
	Not only former director of Twitter, but chancellor of the Open University.
	Oh, former director?
	I love it. AI, free speech, director of Twitter, working with government.
	I mean, techno-fascism in your face on display right here.
	Right here, CEO of Microsoft, former director of Twitter, former prime minister, AI global governance, Chatham House.
	And a co-founder and chair of Lucky Voice, which has revolutionized the karaoke industry.
	But we're not going there today.
	We're starting on these bigger and more serious, anyway, questions.
	Thank you all very, very much for coming here.
	Let me start with you all of just saying, if you can give us almost the hardest thing, your calibration of how big this challenge is.
	We've had these extraordinary statements, all the more striking for coming from people who lead Technology companies warning apocalyptically about the threats to the human race and about the ways that technology may now run ahead and seeming, if you like, without limit on the threat side and people also pouring words and words to my mind most movingly and excitedly actually at the moment in some of the pharmaceutical and medical diagnostics.
	I mean, again, it should scare the shit out of people.
	They want to use this for pharmaceutical and medical.
	Just trust the AI. Trust the AI. Oh, the AI doesn't get it wrong.
	Oh, this is tailored just for you.
	No, no, no, no.
	Industry, about the potential.
	How do you see it in its significance, Brad?
	We've often had this conversation, a few of us inside Microsoft, what invention do we compare this to?
	That seems the most apt.
	And I think the one that I've come to, others as well, I think is the printing press.
	It was perfected by Gutenberg in 1452 and it fundamentally changed the humanities ability To write, to create, to share knowledge and wreak havoc and bring good as people were able to write and read more books.
	And I would just analogize briefly that, in some ways, It made England and Great Britain a global power because by the year 1500 the Netherlands and England were consuming more books than any other country in the world.
	And of course it turned out that the fears of some Also proved to be true.
	There was a concern in the Ottoman Empire, it's what led them to ban the printing press 20 years after it was invented, that the clerics would lose control of religion, that the rulers would lose control of their people, and the calligraphers would lose their jobs.
	Well, once again, you look at this and it's about narrative control.
	And that's why they want to regulate the AI. Just like the Ottoman Empire wanted to regulate what?
	The printing press so people didn't have access to knowledge.
	And it's all about suppressing access to knowledge to the vast majority of people.
	And to some degree Martin Luther proved that indeed with the power of the printing press the clerics did lose control of religion and the Holy Roman Empire proved that the rulers did then lose control of people and absolutely the calligraphers lost their jobs.
	So it's profound.
	Almost everything that's good and everything that's bad about the world in which we live today could in some ways be taken back to that invention.
	This will do the same thing.
	Tony, do you want to comment on that?
	First of all, by the way, thank you to Chatham House for having us here.
	It's a great pleasure to be with Brad and with Martha.
	You couldn't have two more expert people.
	Personally, I don't think we've had enough of experts.
	LAUGHTER Sorry, Brett, that's an in-joke for the British.
	Nothing in-joke about it.
	Like, the expert class are minions of the predator class, and he's joking about the fact that people have had enough of the expert class bullshit.
	Tony Blair hasn't. And so I'm not going to talk so much, because I'm not qualified to talk about some of the technical detail of this, but What I do want to say is that Brad used the analogy of the printing press.
	I use the analogy of the 19th century Industrial Revolution.
	But you can get the magnitude of that from these analogies of what we're talking about.
	I think this will change everything.
	And the fascinating thing My institute actually once published a paper on this about three or four years back, which is how long did it take the world of politics to catch up with reality in the Industrial Revolution?
	And the answer is it took a long time.
	And in the end, when it did catch up, and things move much faster today, but everything changed.
	I mean, everything changed, and the modern state was born out of it.
	Modern political parties were also born out of it.
	So I think we're at the start of a revolutionary change, and the essential thing is that we comprehend it and get our heads around it from the public policy point of view.
	Sometimes when people, particularly from my own political persuasion on the center-left, as it were, You know, they say, we've got so many difficulties, we've got public spending pressures and high taxes and low growth and low productivity.
	What's our... How can we be ambitious?
	What's our mission in this world of turmoil?
	And I said, this is your mission.
	This is going to change everything.
	So how you understand, master, and harness this technology revolution will define the place of this country and the shape of the world.
	So get your heads around that and stop spending your time thinking about a little bit more on tax, a little bit less on tax, a little bit more on spending, a little bit less on spending.
	That is not what the future is going to be about.
	Accessing its opportunities, and I'm an opportunity person on it, but mitigating its risks.
	Mitigating its risks means total government control.
	Okay? When he's talking about budgets, one of the reasons that they're not going to matter is because if they institute their AI in the manner they're intending, what?
	They're talking about blockchain digital currencies.
	So once you're in that system, it's more command control than anything.
	And the entire scope of budgets changes instantly.
	100%. We only got a couple minutes left in the broadcast.
	There's plenty of that.
	I'm probably going to end up watching that whole thing.
	It's about an hour panel.
	I do want to remind people, again, redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored, redvoicemedia.com.
	Slash Uncensored.
	A buck for the first week.
	Ten bucks a month. Or lock it in for a year for $100.
	That really, really does help support the broadcast.
	It's how we keep this thing afloat.
	Again, Clay Clark, Craig Posta, Jardula, some of the past interviews that we've done.
	Norbin Laden recently had Nico House on the broadcast.
	Obviously we have Slow News Day Steve.
	A lot of great in-depth interviews.
	Derek Brose, Jay Dyer, etc.
	And you help support redvoicemedia.com And remember, you get an extra hour of Burmese right now if you're over at RVM Rumble.
	If you're not, you can go over there and you can watch what was One of the premiums.
	Sam Husseini, another great interview that I've recently done for the premium platform.
	Richard Bartlett. I can go on and on.
	John Fleetwood. On and on and on and on and on.
	Great stuff. So we got another hour coming up over at RBM Rumble.
	Then on top of that, we have great presenters throughout the day.
	Wayne Dupree, Chad Caten, Ray Dietrich, Drew Berquist, you name it.
	Redvoicemedia.com is where it's at.
	And folks, as you know, it is never about left or right in this broadcast.
	It is always about right and wrong.

▲