All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 23, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
59:50
Biden 9/11 Criminal And Vax-UnVax With Josh Reid And Brian Hooker | MSOM Ep. 828

Watch it first Monday - Friday at 6pm Eastern only at http://AmpNews.us

|

Time Text
Never Forget 9-11 Anniversary 00:07:01
Welcome to Making Sense of the Madness.
I am Jason Burmese and buckle up.
We've got a heck of a banger for you today.
We got Josh Reed to talk about Biden, 9-11, the anniversary, and much more.
And then we have the co-author of Vax Unvax Let the Science Speak, Brian Hooker, with us to talk about his collaboration with RFK Jr. on this very important piece of literature.
Buckle up and get ready to make sense of the madness, to renew our sacred vow,
never forget, never forget.
We never forget.
Each of us, each of those precious lives stolen too soon when evil attacked.
Ground zero in New York.
And I remember standing there the next day and looking at the building.
I felt like I was looking through the gates of hell.
It looked so devastating because the way you could story from where you could stand.
A sad state of affairs as Joe Biden is a shell of his former self and one of the most, if not the most obvious puppet we have ever had in this country.
They did not even roll him out at any of the sites of the 9-11 anniversary.
They had him in Anchorage, Alaska.
And by the way, no, he was not at ground zero the next day.
In fact, what we're going to show you right now is the day after 9-11, he was actually grand standing against Pakistan because for those not in the know, because Pakistan wasn't really part of the war of terror or discussed by the media, General Mahmoud Ahmed, the head of the Pakistani intelligence service, the ISI, was actually meeting with prominent members within the government on the morning of 9-11 and the week of 9-11.
And guess what?
Joe Biden ended up being one of those people.
But don't take my word for it.
We're going to play this clip, introduced by Colin Powell.
It is a segment from my film, Fabled Enemies, and then Joe Biden himself admitting to meeting with one of the money men behind 9-11, the guy who wired 100 grand to ATA the week of the attacks.
Let's roll it.
Secretary Powell, one country you didn't mention was Pakistan, and I understand that your deputy has spoken with the ambassador to Pakistani.
Deputy Secretary Armitage did meet with Pakistani officials today.
It would be useful to point out to the Pakistani leadership at every level how helpful they might be if we find a basis to act upon that information.
Senator Joe Biden, who had also met with the head of the Pakistani ISI, would have harsh words on the Senate floor.
And the word should go out to those who pretend that they wish to be our friends, that they're going to have to make some very difficult choices.
Pakistan in particular is going to have to make a very difficult choice very soon.
Words will not be sufficient.
Actions will be demanded.
When Biden was confronted, he confirmed his meeting with Ahmed, saying Pakistani intelligence was indeed funding the Taliban.
Sir, sir, in the days, in the days following 9-11, you met with the head of Pakistani ISI, General Mohad Ahmed.
Has since come to light that he ordered Saeed Sheikh to wire $100,000 to Muhammad Ada.
Why was he allowed to go back to Pakistan?
And why wasn't he questioned?
And why were you meeting with him?
I met with him to deliver a message that if he didn't, if he didn't stop supporting the Taliban, we would take him out.
Why did we let him go?
We let him fly freely.
We never investigated him.
We never even looked into him.
Look, there's a thing called diplomatic passports.
We did not arrest Khrushchev when he came, but he financed the hijackers and you let him go and he's free.
He hijacked the fire.
Hijacked the new financed official.
It's why I say get word.
He would later state that the information was indeed classified.
How did you know the ISI was helping the Taliban, sir?
How did you know that?
Are you really classified?
That is classified.
So why haven't we seen that on all the mainstream news networks?
That was back in 2008 when he was running for the presidency.
Fell a little short, but got to be what?
The buddy of the Barack star.
To talk about that and more is AMP News contributor Josh Reed.
Josh, Biden's been on the embarrassment train the past several days.
He can barely speak.
He said that good morning Vietnam was a song and not a film.
And he made it into good evening Vietnam.
He wasn't taking questions from the press except for those that were pre-approved by his staff, stumbling, mumbling.
Where are we with this guy, especially in the light of the 9-11 anniversary and really his treasonous behavior and activity even prior to that?
Well, you know, Jason, every time I see this man, he reminds me of Jeff Dunham's Walter, the puppet with the hand up the button.
You know what I'm talking about?
And every time I see this guy, it just reminds me of Jeff Dunham's Walter.
And I just can't stop thinking about that.
But Joe Biden is a puppet and he's puppet right now for multiple international interests and foreign interests.
The problem is that Joe Biden's mental health has made him compromise against those sources.
We're seeing right now that Speaker McCarthy is going to approve the impeachment proceedings.
We have right now global conflict on the verge.
Armenia and Azerbaijan are going at it.
We have Iran backing our Azerbaijan.
We have Turkey backing Armenia.
We have a potential conflict that's going to arise there.
Israel is going to support, sorry, the other way around.
Iran is supporting Armenia and then Turkey is supporting Azerbaijan where Israel is going to support Azerbaijan.
This could completely break out into another proxy war with the West.
The Democrats need a distraction, Jason.
That's what's really going on right now.
And I don't know if you saw Twitter yesterday, but it was all just plastered with anti-9/11 conspiracies.
Pentagon's Hidden Bio Labs 00:02:15
It was all like, oh, it was definitely a plane that flew into the Pentagon, and you people don't know what you're talking about.
And there were two planes that took down the Twin Towers.
And Building 7 was because of this new process called thermal expansion, which NIST, the National Institutes of Science and Technologies, just released yesterday of this new phenomenon they discovered known as thermal expansion.
And this happened to Building 7.
When the Twin Towers fell, those fires jumped through the walls and underneath the ground and melted the steel beams without doing any damage to the ice outside of the building and collapsed it like a controlled demolition.
But you know, Jason, we're sitting here expected to believe this garbage.
The $2.3 trillion from September 10th that was being investigated at the Pentagon Audit Office.
You got to wonder what was really being hidden behind that.
One of the primary defense contractors during that time, Hallie Burton, its former CEO, was vice president of the United States at the time.
There is billions, if not trillions of dollars in money being funneled from the taxpayer into the Pentagon out to special projects that was being given to all these defense contractors.
And all they needed was a war to cash in on it.
And that's exactly what they got under George Walker or George Walker Bush.
And September 11th, the events that happened thereof, as well as the ability to take away our freedoms, our rights, and our liberties.
We have the Patriot Act that comes out of this, and we know the atrocities that came out of that is basically we live in this Homeland Security terrorist state where national emergencies, national health emergencies can now be declared for gun violence.
That comes about because of the precedent set by the Patriot Act.
Then we also have the 2004 biological and chemical weapons bill that came about.
Now, one interesting point about that that nobody is even talking about is that allotted gain of function research to start occurring within the United States Pentagon.
Not only that, is funding from the Obama administration in 2008 directly from that bill allowed the United States to go into a small European, former Soviet country and repurposing all of their former bio and chemical, biological and chemical warfare labs.
Political Persecution in Georgia 00:10:26
That country was called Ukraine.
And we went in there and repurposed a whole bunch of these Eastern European former Soviet bio and chemical labs, of which we know what happened there later on.
Obviously, after 2014, the coup, the United States went back in, took possession of them after losing them for a short period of time, and started their gain of function research there where we get the heart of COVID actually created.
August 19th, 2019, Tom Rentz has the document of COVID-19 being named in a specific Department of Defense document requesting information from one of the bio labs in Ukraine.
Now, Jason, what we're moving into right now with crazy, demented Joe Biden is they're going to bait and switch.
They're going to, who's the next batter up?
We saw Kamala Harris just last week say, I'm ready to be president if Joe Biden has to step down or if his health can't do anything.
I think what we're about to see here is the left is going to remove their own president and they're going to install somebody new for the time being, getting ready for potentially Newsome Obama ticket in 2024.
And the reason I say that specifically is because the Republicans in Congress are starting the impeachment hearings.
We know that there's this audio call, most likely given by Devin Archer to Congress that is basically just the worst evidence in the world against Joe Biden and quid pro quo and corruption and selling estate secrets.
So when this does come out, this is going to ruin the Democrats, which means that before this gets to the Senate to where the Senate would have to impeach Joe Biden, no matter what, because of this evidence, they got to stop this impeachment trial.
Well, how do you do that?
You either have Joe Biden step down, get out of office, move down because of his health, or he's got to die in office, which would be the most profound way.
Joe Biden passing away due to old age in the office or dying of COVID, one of those things.
And what happens is, is the Republicans will no longer be able to proceed with their investigations on Joe Biden because if we look at sacrilegious, oh, you're going to investigate a dead guy.
How dare you let his memory just live on and just drop it?
Why?
Because that is the cornerstone.
That is what leads to the sinking of the House of Cards of the deep state.
Joe Biden is that door that when it is opened, it's Pandora's political box.
It opens up everything from the Obamas to the Clintons to everybody else in between.
It unravels a deep state and will collapse the House of Cards.
And they cannot allow that to happen.
So there's a few different scenarios that need to happen, Jason.
They either need to remove Joe Biden or they need to create some type of black swan international crisis, global crisis to where they can secure power and shut down communications, shut down the internet and take back over control of the narrative, which they know that they literally cannot do just because so many people are awake right now.
Well, a few things there.
Number one, I think that they may wait until after the election to remove him because they do not want debates.
They do not want a real primary process.
As you know, today they're actually voting to change the rules that would essentially sure.
There's no way that RFK Jr. could possibly get the number of delegates to run if he dared to step foot in places like New Hampshire and Iowa.
We'll be showing that clip as well.
But you also mentioned the Patriot Act post 9-11.
Now, Joe Biden, back in his very, very criminal days as a Delaware senator, actually bragged that he introduced the Patriot Act all the way back in 1994 because versions of this had really been on the table for some time, especially after the 1993 World Trade Center bombing that you had an FBI informant, Ahmed Salam, build the bomb that eventually went off and in the wrong place.
So they weren't able to fast track it then.
I would love to see some type of meaningful prosecutions.
I don't know if that's here.
I've seen now Newsom and Chuck Todd dicing it up over whether he would run for the presidency.
And he's like, we've got to just accept Joe Biden's running.
And I think that's because they plan on installing him after stealing 2024.
Who knows?
We're certainly on a roller coaster right now.
And my biggest fear is that it will be some type of global event that shifts the narrative.
Whether or not it's a blackout or more than a proxy war, we have yet to see.
But we haven't even thrown into the mix, Josh, these trials with Trump.
Now you have both Navarro, Navarro found guilty of contempt and will go to jail, and essentially Giuliani found guilty and not able to present evidence.
What are your thoughts there?
I feel like, especially in the Georgia case, we're going to see verdicts like that, decisions like that, go down like dominoes.
Well, yeah, no, absolutely.
You're right.
This is political persecution.
And the question is, is how long will the people put up with it?
The people of Georgia, let's take New Mexico, for example.
What just happened in New Mexico?
The governor just suspended the Second Amendment.
People are, well, no, she said you can't conceal, carry, and open carry.
Yeah, well, that means you can't carry a firearm on your person anywhere in public.
That is suspending the Second Amendment.
And she believes she's doing this through her emergency powers under a health emergency.
We're lucky that there are constitutional sheriffs in the state of New Mexico who have stepped forth and says that we believe this is unconstitutional and we will not be enforcing this.
And that's really important to understand because your sheriffs, the elected officials of those states are the primary point that have the power to step up against a radical tyrannical governor.
We have two people in the state House of Representatives in New Mexico who are going to move forth potentially with impeachment of the governor, Governor Grisham.
Now, Jason, going back to Giuliani and Navarro and Trump, this is political persecution.
They are going to put the hammer on these people.
And the reason they're going to do that, because they want to send a message the same way that they're sending the message with everybody from January 6th.
Okay.
The reason that the punishments are so harsh for January 6th, the reason why there's no evidence allowed to be shown, they're not accepting any exculpatory evidence of these people is because they want to send a message to you and me not to step out of line, not to stand up, not to rise up, not to speak up, to know your damn place, to sit back down and let the world transition into their new world order.
That is the message that's being sent right now.
We got to go.
I totally agree.
And basically, they want to put fear and set the precedent of these type of prosecutions against political dissidents.
We'll talk to you next week.
Thank you so much for joining us.
Folks, when we come back, the author of Vax Unvax, Let the Science Speak, Ryan Hooker joins us.
Stay tuned.
We'll be back after this.
Banks are supposed to be the safest placeholders for cash in the world.
But in 2022, that changed.
The Federal Reserve pulled out $2.5 trillion of liquidity out of the banks, and the Fed also changed the requirements so banks don't need to keep any funds on hand.
This means banks are starved for liquidity and have now become very dangerous places to hold your assets.
Get out of the system with the world's safest and most private assets, silver and gold.
Call Kirk Elliott PhD at 720-605-3900.
Get more out of your AMP news experience with AMP Insider with seven pillars of focused information, including wealth strategies.
Find comprehensive videos on understanding precious metals and start building wealth the right way.
Support the mission of AMP with a subscription for $9.95 per month.
Get the first month for $1 by using promo code AMP888.
Welcome to a new era of connecting patriots, Amp Insider.
DNC does not want a primary.
They're effectively disenfranchising the Democratic voters from having any choice in who becomes the Democratic nominee.
So two of the things they've done to date, they've made rules that if any candidate sets foot in the state of Iowa or sets foot in the state of New Hampshire, that none of the votes that are cast for that candidate will be tallied.
In other words, any delegate that I win in New Hampshire or Iowa would go instead to the president.
And now they're trying to change it so that if I campaign in New Hampshire, that none of the votes cast for me in Georgia will count.
And that's significant because it's hard to win the nomination without Georgia.
If you add up all the superdelegates that they control and all of the automatic delegates that just go to the party and go to the president, I would have to win almost 80% of all of the states in order to be President Biden, even if he only wins 20%.
You know, we live at a time in American history when a lot of Americans think that democracy is broken, that the political system is rigged and that there's not really any democracy.
And unfortunately, the DNC is taking a lot of steps that confirm that outlook.
If you like this video and you want to help me become president of the United States, go to kennedy24.com and donate now.
And he's certainly somebody we need to get behind because they are pulling out all the stops.
And they not only don't want him as the president of the United States, but as I said earlier, they don't even want him in the debate process.
They don't want a primary because he will be speaking many of the things that they don't want you discuss, including the vaccination issue.
Flu Shot Controversies 00:12:07
And to discuss that is the co-author of the book with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Brian Hooker, PhD.
It is Vax, Unvax, Let the Science Speak.
Now, Brian, we've all been told to trust the science again and again and again.
First of all, how do you get involved in this book?
And then after you start looking at the data, because this book really is talking about traditional vaccinations prior to the COVID-19 era and the academic papers, over 100 of which are reviewed in this book, what does that science say and how did you get involved?
Well, thank you so much for having me on the show, Jason.
It's really a pleasure to be with you.
And really, these are the studies that the government has refused to do.
I've been in this debate since 2001.
I have a vaccine-injured child, and we have been calling for the government to do vax versus unvax study to look at, you know, what are the outcomes of fully vaccinated children following the vaccination schedule.
It's a very, very large schedule with over 73 vaccines between the ages 0 and 18 compared to those who are completely unvaccinated.
You know, what in the heck is going on here?
And so Mr. Kennedy actually approached Dr. Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins in 2017 and said, where are the studies?
Where are the vaccs unvaccinated?
There was a meeting, an official meeting, and it included Mr. Kennedy, Del Bigtree, Aaron Seary, and Lynn Redwood.
And Anthony Fauci made a big scene in that meeting and said, oh, there are vax unvaxxed studies.
We've done these comparisons.
And he wheeled in files of papers and rifled through these papers and he couldn't find a one.
And finally, exasperated, he said, oh, I will email you these studies.
Well, he never really followed up with that.
But Mr. Kennedy was really undeterred.
And he contacted me in 2019 and said, let's look for these studies.
There are studies where vaccinated and unvaccinated children, vaccinated and unvaccinated adults have been compared.
And so we looked in the National Library of Medicine starting in 2019, and we found a handful of studies at first.
And I thought, oh, well, we'll find about 12 studies maybe.
But I distilled these down into simple graphics, you know, easy to understand descriptions of these studies.
And Mr. Kennedy featured these on his Instagram and Facebook accounts.
And 60 studies later, we were still doing this in 2021.
And Mr. Kennedy was deplatformed from Facebook and Instagram in 2021.
And we wanted to get the information out and said he came to me and we kind of came to the conclusion that this is a book.
And so we continued our research through the COVID-19 era, added about 40 more studies.
And now we have a compilation of about 100 vax unvax studies in this book, covering anything from the vaccination schedule, Thimerosol, the mercury containing preservative and vaccines, the MMR vaccine, the COVID-19 vaccine.
We did want to feature.
We found many, many studies regarding the COVID-19 vaccine, vaccines and pregnancy, the Gulf War syndrome and vaccines.
And so we took all of this and made it into a compendium of easily understandable graphics and descriptions of these studies.
This is really a handbook that shows what happens when you compare vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals.
So let's talk about some of those issues that you just discussed with the vaccines, because it's a broad line.
You said everything from thimerosol, which contains mercury as a preservative.
We have the adjuncts.
You have the MMRs.
You have the scheduling aspect of this.
Before we get into any of that stuff.
Over 100 of these studies, what's the first study that you're reading?
And it surprised even you, somebody who's been studying this, like you said, since 2001, where you're really taken aback and you're like, wow, this is powerful information if only the public knew.
Well, the forerunner study was really a study done by a researcher named Anthony Mawson, and it came out in 2017.
And he looked at approximately 660 homeschoolers and did parental surveys of these homeschoolers.
Some were unvaccinated, some were partially vaccinated, and some were fully vaccinated.
And his results were remarkable.
There were four times as much autism in the vaccinated group as compared to those that were completely unvaccinated.
Nasal allergies, there were 30 times as many diagnosis of nasal allergies in these vaccinated individuals.
And it seemed like allergies really abounded and autoimmune disorders, things like asthma, and then also neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism, ADD, ADHD, were all higher in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group.
But really what kind of caught my eye was vaccines are supposed to prevent infectious diseases.
But it seemed like the vaccinated individuals, and this was statistically significant, had more respiratory infections and had more ear infections than their unvaccinated counterparts to a factor of about four to one.
And that was really, you know, that kind of got me off my tush.
And I started to do more of this research.
Some of the papers in the book, I actually published with a colleague of mine, Neil Miller.
And we went through medical records and actually verified what the Mawson study, the original Mawson study said.
So let's talk about the aspects I just discussed.
When we're talking about thimerosol as a preservative, what did you find in the majority of the studies that that alone had with effects over a large population, I guess?
Well, many people believe that thimerosol is no longer in vaccines, and that's simply not true.
Thimerisol is still in multi-dose formulations of the flu shot, the same flu shot that they give to pregnant women during any trimester of pregnancy.
And one of the things that became very clear was that thimerisol, given in the flu shot, and this was actually a flu shot study.
It wasn't necessarily a thimerisol study, but the flu shot itself had given in the first trimester, those infants born had a higher incidence of autism spectrum disorder.
And this was a study done by the CDC.
They actually lied about the information, but we reanalyzed the data.
I actually submitted a letter to the editor into the journal, and that overturned the line, basically exposed the fact that autism spectrum disorder is related to flu shots given in the first trimester of pregnancy.
And we also saw myriad other neurological disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders, including things like precocious puberty, especially in females.
That's premature puberty, speech and language disorders, ticks, other types of nonspecific learning disorders, ADD, ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder.
All of these, you know, and it's weird because you would almost expect it.
Mercury is a neurotoxin.
So if we're injecting a neurotoxin into pregnant women and into individuals every year that are getting the flu shot, wouldn't we see neurotoxicity?
And that's exactly what the studies bear out.
So let's talk about the other effect of this.
They're telling you, you said, you know, usually the flu shot is where you're exposed to this.
Is it even stopping the flu, according to the scientific data?
Not really.
It was interesting.
I love the flu shot chapter.
I had a lot of time, a lot of fun with Mr. Kennedy putting together the flu shot chapter because we saw that the flu shot in general was seeming to promote individuals to get other respiratory infections and other hospitalizations.
And in some instances, there's actually one study that showed that I think these were adolescents and children that got the flu shot ended up having more hospitalizations due to influenza.
Okay.
It protected against the strains of flu that were chosen to put in that shot.
But, you know, that's really a crapshoot.
They, you know, every year they decide these are the influenza strains that we protected against, but they were wrong.
And it turned out that the other strains of influenza where there was no protection caused these children to be hospitalized more with the flu.
So, you know, given the lack of effectiveness, why are we doing this in the first place, especially when you're talking about a thomerisol containing vaccine?
So then the question is, are they developing other types of autoimmune disorders from something as simple as a flu shot if they are more susceptible to other strains?
And you know as well as I do, they're really just rolling the dice and sometimes playing pretend because those mutations occur very rapidly and at a high level.
And you're producing these things at a time period where you're always kind of behind the curve.
And yet that's never discussed.
We got to take a break.
When we come back, I want to talk about the regimentation of these shots and where we were early on in vaccination programs compared to where we are today.
Like you said, we're talking 70, 80 vaccines before you're 18 years of age.
We'll be back after this.
It's making sense of the madness.
The book is Vax UnVax.
Let the science speak.
don't go anywhere.
Over the last 20 years, with all your support, we've been able to not only launch the original MyPillow, but also the MyPillow mattress topper, Giza Dream bedsheets, MySlippers, and the MyPillow bath towels.
But there's so much more.
In fact, we have over 200 products, and I'm so confident that you'll love each and every one of them that when you go to mypillow.com now, you'll immediately receive a free gift valued at $20 just for checking out the website.
No purchase necessary.
Get everything from my pillow blankets, sleepwear, kitchen towels, mattresses, duvets, pet beds, body pillows, comforters, couch pillows, bathrobes, and so much more.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get deep discounts on all my pillow products.
And remember, just for checking out mypillow.com, you'll immediately receive a free gift valued at $20, no purchase necessary.
This is a limited time promotion, so go to MyPillow.com now.
We are back.
We're joined by the co-author of Vax Unvax, Let the Science Speak, Brian Hooker.
Adjuvants and Autoimmune Concerns 00:16:03
And Brian, early on, you discussed the regimentation of these vaccinations.
So I'm wondering in these studies, you know, earlier you talked about the class of homeschoolers, some not vaxed, partially vaxed, fully vaxed.
When you're looking at this and you're looking at a wide spectrum, are you looking at people that maybe had a regimentation of 10 vaccinations through their lifetime, as opposed that had the 50 plus, 60 plus?
And is there a difference?
When you look at the vaccination schedule and the expansion of the vaccination schedule, when I, you know, I grew up in the 60s and was vaccinated in the 60s and early 70s, I received five vaccines in the 1980s.
If you looked at and separated out the DTP or the DTAP vaccine and called that three, then for 18-year-olds, there were 25 vaccines.
And now we're at this bloated schedule with 73 minimum.
You know, that's not counting COVID boosters, 73 vaccines between the ages of 0 and 18, and then between 21 and 26 vaccines in the first year of life.
What in the heck are we doing when we have well-baby checkups where a child at two months, four months, six months, 12 months of age can receive as many as six vaccines at a time?
And these have never been tested together.
They haven't been tested together.
And we're seeing an increase overall in chronic disorders in the United States in children.
A 2011 figure showed that, including obesity, that 54% of all the children in the United States had some type of chronic disease or chronic disorder.
And so I think it's really no coincidence that when a liability, the liability shield was erected for vaccine manufacturers, that was in 1986 through the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.
And that erected a shield that where you could not sue vaccine manufacturers for vaccine injuries.
And instead, you went to a no-fault program called the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, which is funded by taxes on vaccines.
It's not funded by the pharmaceutical industry.
So these vaccines are such big business that all of a sudden vaccines were added to the schedule for very, very flimsy rationales, like the hepatitis B shot from the first day of life, where, you know, hepatitis B that you get basically from, it's a blood-borne pathogen from sexual contact or illicit drug use.
And so, but they yet they give it on the first day of life.
And it's one of the most understudied things I think I've ever found in the literature.
We did have a study, or I'm sorry, we did have a chapter featuring the hepatitis B vaccine, but we could find nothing regarding what happens when you give the hepatitis B vaccine at birth.
And it just had, it has not been studied.
The clinical trials themselves around that vaccine are very, very flimsy.
And so you're looking at this sort of great unknown when you participate in the vaccination schedule.
And overall, when we looked at children who were up to date, and these studies came out in 2020, 2021, 2017, we saw that children that were participating and getting all of the vaccines were much, much sicker, much, much sicker from a standpoint of chronic diseases, chronic ailments, as well as less, less protection and sort of immune suppression against infectious diseases.
And so, you know, this was very, very compelling.
And it's a consistent theme throughout the book, throughout the chapters, is that when you have over-vaccination, when you have individuals, even with things like Gulf War syndrome, it was popping up and it was statistically significant with the number of vaccines received, even in those soldiers who were not in the Gulf War, who were not deployed in the Gulf War.
It was related to the number of vaccines that they received prior to their military service or as a part of their military service.
So it was very, very consistent throughout the book.
And it's really a theme that Mr. Kennedy and I sought just throughout the literature.
So upon the Gulf War a little bit, because often that's kind of like the forgotten war, especially with where we are today.
But I specifically remember that in the mid to late 90s, later on, Gulf War veterans, they were featured.
But like you said, other soldiers that had taken these regiment of shots developed all sorts of terrible autoimmune disorders, even severe paralysis, et cetera, neurological disorders.
What were that regiment of shots?
And what do you find out in the book?
Well, the regiment of shots, I believe I don't know exactly the needle sticks and the vaccines they got.
I knew that they did get an anthrax vaccine.
Typically, they would get other types of pathogens that were associated with foreign travel, like yellow fever vaccine.
But many of the vaccines were experimental.
And there's very, very little choice in the U.S. military.
And from some of the contacts that I have from Children's Health Defense that are members of the military, experimental vaccines, you're expected to get them.
And so it's very difficult to know what happens when you get 10 vaccines.
And putting together the Gulf War chapter, Mr. Kennedy and I were really, you know, it was almost like we covered the basics that the vaccines were actually exacerbating Gulf War syndrome and those who were deployed in the Persian Gulf.
And it was causing Gulf War syndrome and those who were not deployed in the Persian Gulf.
And, you know, we barely pulled back the onion on that.
I know that there's other literature, not vaccs on vaccs literature.
That was sort of the metric of the studies actually being included in the book.
But there's other literature around the anthrax vaccine itself.
And so that was something that I would love to look at further.
It was something that was not included in the book.
And like I said, in the Gulf War chapter, we just sort of barely pulled back the onion and looked at the number of vaccines that these service members were receiving.
So we've covered thimerosol.
We've now covered the Gulf War syndrome.
Let's talk about measles, mumps, rubella, the MMR vaccine.
What are your findings there?
Because that's one of the most accepted regimens of vaccinations out there that is rarely questioned, if at all.
Well, this is a very, very interesting topic.
The CDC themselves, if you look at their, they produce what is considered the seminal study on the MMR vaccine in the U.S. vaccination schedule.
It was produced in 2004.
And in that study, hiding in plain sight, if you look closely at the tables, those children who received the MMR vaccine on time, you know, between 12 and 15 months of age, were about 50% more likely to get an autism diagnosis than those children who simply waited on the first MMR vaccine until after three years of age.
And it's a statistically significant relationship.
Further, when you look at that study, you look at boys individually, the risk goes up to 67% higher when you look at boys only.
And so when you look at that study, the conclusion is that the MMR vaccine is not associated with autism incidents.
And the timing of the MMR vaccine specifically does not cause autism.
But when you look at the data itself, it says something completely different.
And we pointed that out in the paper.
And then I further analyzed the data.
This kind of gets into a story of a whistleblower, a CDC whistleblower named Dr. William Thompson.
And then I personally analyzed that information and analyzed that data and saw that the risk for African-American males was astronomical.
It was more like 3.6, 3.8 times higher in the African-American males that received the MMR vaccine on time versus those that receive the MMR after three years of age.
And it leads you to wonder what would happen.
You know, the CDC never tested unvaccinated children.
What would happen if they had those children that completely skipped the MMR?
What would the risk look like?
And that's just studies that CDC will never do.
So you also discussed the hepatitis vaccination.
Some of the other ones that have been concerning to me was the push, say, for HPV, both in girls in the beginning and then boys and getting ever and ever younger, the human pampolona virus, which they sell you as some type of an STD that could cause cancer, could being the key word.
And then they say that this could protect you from developing that cancer.
What did you find with Gardasil and other shots like it?
Well, one of the things that's very interesting about the Gardasil vaccine is that it was never compared against a placebo control.
It was never compared against a true placebo.
And so when they did the clinical trial, they actually gave the control group the same aluminum adjuvant that's in the Gardasil vaccine.
And that aluminum adjuvant had never really been tested before.
And so this was their baseline.
This was their control group.
It was, you know, science at its worst, absolute worst.
You know, the control group, the women in the study, it was originally women only in the study were receiving an aluminum adjuvant untested.
Aluminum is neurotoxic.
And so there was an uptick of autoimmune disorders in both the group that got the Gardasil and the control group.
And the uptick was that out of one, every 100 women who received that vaccine, two came up with a serious autoimmune disorder.
That's a very, very high rate.
You know, when we're told that vaccine injury is one in a million or one in two million, and then you look at the real data and two out of 100 women have a serious autoimmune disorder, then that, you know, that really needs to be reported.
We actually saw a strong uptick in autoimmune disorders associated with the hepatitis.
I'm sorry, with the HPV vaccine.
Specifically, if you look at the CDC's vaccine adverse events reporting system, it's a database called VARES.
And there were all of a sudden, as soon as the Gardasil vaccine was introduced, it was originally introduced in 2006, and then a new version called Gardasil 9 came out in the 200 teens.
But all of a sudden, neurological disorders in women and cardiac disorders in women, things like tachycardia and orthostatic taphyl tachycardia, which has to do with balance in the vestibular system, all of a sudden skyrocketed in these women.
And as they started to introduce the vaccine to men, then the same type of phenomenon was seen.
And the rate of disorders for the HPV vaccine eclipsed everything else in VARES.
You know, there were other vaccines that were given, but the HPV was the vaccine that was associated with the most adverse events and the highest rate of adverse events.
Yeah, until the COVID-1984 nightmare hits, which we're going to hit on hopefully in the final segment.
We've got to take another break when we come back.
You used the word adjuvant.
Most people are completely unaware of what that is.
I want to go over that and why they're in these shots to begin with.
It is making sense of the madness.
The book is Vax Unvax.
Let the science speak, RFK Jr. and Brian Hooker.
Go get it today.
We'll be back after this.
Hi, this is Sean Morgan, the host of the Sean Morgan Report on Fridays and the director of marketing at Amp News.
We're now calling all Patriot business owners to advertise with us through commercials and interviews on our shows.
We get 2 million collective views per month and reach an important demographic of 40 to 70 year old patriotic buyers.
If you would like to reach our audience with your product or service, simply email me, Sean at ampnews.us.
And it's also in the description box below.
AMP viewers are potential loyal lifetime customers for your business.
So let AMP produce a professional commercial for you or get an opportunity to truly explain your business and its impact in an interview format.
You could even reach our email list of Patriot subscribers.
There are lots of options to engage with us.
I'm offering free consultations to Patriot business owners for a limited time.
So reach out today at the email below.
Let's build that parallel economy together.
Patriots supporting Patriots.
We are back.
It's making sense of the madness.
Brian, you use the word adjuvant, and a lot of people are unfamiliar with this term.
Could you please explain it to my audience and why we find it in vaccinations to begin with?
Well, an adjuvant is an additive to the vaccine that is supposed to enhance the immune response to the portion of the pathogen, what's called an antigen.
Okay.
So when you look at fundamental vaccinology, every vaccine has an antigen, which is a little bit or piece or part or genetic code from the actual pathogen, like hepatitis or COVID-19 or the human papillomavirus.
And so when you have an antigen, sometimes your immune response is sluggish and slow, and they'll add an additive, usually something that is at least slightly toxic, sometimes very, very toxic, and it causes a magnification of the immune response.
It's almost like the immune response has a ground zero reaction where all of a sudden you add this adjuvant and it magnifies, you know, hundreds of times what the immune response would be.
Sometimes it's very, very specific.
Other times it can be very, very non-specific.
You can get a non-specific immune response from something like an aluminum adjuvant.
And I think that these additives that are not in all vaccines, they're not in live virus vaccines, but these adjuvants we have to be very, very careful with, especially when you look at the immune system, then all of a sudden attacking itself and then eliciting things like autoimmune disorders.
It's frightening to me because just like you said earlier, a lot of people are unaware of what's actually in these things.
They think the thimerosol is gone.
Vaccine Safety Concerns 00:11:26
They're constantly bombarded with the terminology safe and effective.
But that terminology was really used pre-Fauci era.
And I mean that in the sense of him putting being put on the world stage because he's been there for a very, very long time.
And this has been a talking point of the CDC with these shots.
Where's the first time you really come across the terminology of safe and effective when in fact, you know, the evidence shows the complete opposite?
Oh, I believe that safe and effective has been around probably as long as vaccines have been around.
You know, it's a terminology that you see.
It was a terminology back when there was a vaccine called the DTP, the diphtheria tetanus whole cell pertussis vaccine that was associated with myriad adverse events, including things like SIDS.
And yet the prevailing authorities were like, well, go ahead and get the shot.
We know that, you know, there are some adverse events associated with the shot, but it was a horrible vaccine.
It was absolutely devastating.
And it was given to very, very early on in the schedule to newborns, but yet they were using this mantra and they would repeat the mantra despite evidence to the opposite and call it safe and effective.
And we've heard it over and over again, really ad nauseum regarding, especially regarding the COVID-19 vaccine.
It's hard to watch television for any period of time.
And, you know, I live in California, California Public Health Department has a campaign pushing the COVID-19 vaccine.
And there it is in bright lights, safe and effective.
It's absolutely impossible to stay away from if you're on any sort of media, whether it just be scrolling on your phone, listening to the radio, or as you said, watching the television.
We've got to take one more break when we come back.
I want to talk about the COVID vaccines or the mRNA gene therapy shots and everything that you found.
It is making sense of the madness.
Be sure to check out the book.
It is vaxed, unvaxxed, let the science speak.
We're with the co-author, Brian Hooker.
He wrote it with RFK Jr.
Segment.
After this final segment
with Brian Hooker and let's talk covid shots.
Number one, we have a gene therapy technology that was not classified as a vaccine until the rollout of these shots through companies like Moderna, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, etc.
Other than the mRNA shots, we also had vector-based shots.
These are really the first shots that were biomolecularly printed up in a Curvac-Tesla partnership.
And as I alluded to before, also had the highest amount of VARES reporting per capita of any shot.
So, how safe and effective are these things?
What did you find in relation to both the mRNA and vector-based shots?
And were there any differences?
These vaccines are not safe and effective.
They've shown not to prevent transmission.
They've shown not to prevent disease.
They really don't prevent hospitalization or death.
And if you look at real mortality data, you know, you're hard pressed to see a difference between the vaccinated, the unvaccinated, you know, specifically looking at deaths from COVID-19 or deaths with COVID-19.
And so the effectiveness is really, really nil.
You know, we're being boosted ad infinitum, you know, into the 20-year booster plan.
And there, like you said, Jason, the VARES reports are just exploding.
You look at the number of VARES reports specific to the COVID-19, it eclipses the 32-year history of VARES before it.
It eclipses, you know, there were, if you look at U.S. only, there are just under a million reports, a million VARES reports.
And we know that that's woefully underreported.
And then you look at the rest of the history of VARES.
It was started 32 years ago.
There are 800,000 reports.
So what in the heck are we doing?
You look at death reports.
There are in the United States only, there are 18,000 death reports as compared to the rest of the history of VARES, which are 5,000 death reports.
So, you know, this is carnage on steroids.
It really, really is.
And there were many, many papers that we were able to feature in the book, specifically looking at the mRNA vaccines, the risk of the mRNA vaccines for cardiac sequelae like myocarditis, pericarditis,
cardiac arrest, Ischemic stroke, you know, not a cardiac disorder, but a clotting disorder, myocardial infarction, all of these things were statistically significantly associated with getting the COVID-19 vaccine, either the first mRNA vaccine or the second mRNA vaccine.
And there was actually sort of a dose response effect, and the risks went up after you got the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine and the Moderna vaccine.
And, you know, you mentioned vector-based vaccines that would be like the Johnson Johnson or Janssen vaccine and the AstraZeneca vaccine.
And, you know, you didn't dodge a bullet with those either.
They were associated in, you know, again, with cardiac sequelae.
They were also associated with things like Bell's palsy, sensory, sudden sensory neural hearing loss, shingles incident.
And, you know, so there were, so were there many, many different studies, and there was sort of a broad array of vaccine adverse events where if you actually break down what these things do, it was, it's highly, you know, you could very much anticipate that this would be the case.
These are poorly designed vaccines.
They're poorly thought out platforms and they're experimental.
We know they're experimental.
Some of the FDA clinical trials for the approval for Pfizer and Moderna vaccines won't expire in 2026.
So, you know, at best, it's really a grand medical experiment, but unfortunately, it's much worse than that.
I think it's much worse than that as well.
We've only got a few minutes left.
You know, earlier we talked about neurological damage and autoimmune disorders.
Now that we're getting further away from these shots and further into booster three, four, five, six, infinite, are you seeing those type of effects in the next two minutes or so?
We're seeing lots of different effects, including neurological, like you said, cardiac, and now the incident of what we would call turbo cancers.
And these are cancers that ramify very, very quickly after the mRNA vaccine.
There's not a lot of information in terms of epidemiology.
It's just really too early to do any epidemiology regarding cancer and the COVID-19 vaccines.
But I'm seeing so many case studies, so many case reports, especially with different types of lymphoma and circulatory system cancers that are popping up.
And, you know, I take pause with that.
I, you know, we see it happen.
And we also know that the mRNA and the vector-based vaccines will insert into the human genome.
You know, it's called transfection, and it happens all the time.
The mRNA vaccines are really the perfect recipe for transfection or genomic insertion, where the genetic material that's in the vaccine can insert into your own cells and then become sort of a part of your living DNA.
That first line of that would be promoting certain types of cancers, and we're seeing that.
It's unbelievable.
Vax Unvax, Let the Science Speak is the book.
It has been a pleasure having you on the program.
We need to do it again because really, we barely scratched the surface.
Obviously, you're with the Children's Health Defense Fund, and what they did with these modern-day vaccines, especially the COVID-19 84 ones, is absolutely tragic.
And they continue to try to impose them on children, impose them on people in certain jobs and positions, and continue their fear-mongering.
Thank you so much, Brian.
We really appreciate it.
And I also appreciate you guys out there for tuning in to AMPnews.us, where the truth lives.
Remember, it is not about left or right.
It is always about right and wrong.
And I'll see you on the flip side.
What should
people know about that whole blow up with Project Veritas?
I read a few people wrong, and that's my fault, but I learned from that, and I think I'll be a more effective messenger as a result of that.
That'll free me up to do the next chapter, the next stage of my evolution, which is OMG, which is decentralizing journalism.
And sometimes things happen for a reason.
That's my goal.
That's my mission.
And I didn't ask for that mission.
I never thought that would be my mission.
It just has become my mission.
And I'm excited about it.
Decentralizing Journalism 00:00:29
Get more out of your AMP news experience with AMP Insider with seven pillars of focused information, including health and wellness.
Receive essential courses on nutrition with the Sherwoods.
Find comprehensive strategies for prevention and reversal of cancer.
Get discounts on products and supplements.
Even download e-books.
Support the mission of AMP with a subscription for $9.95 per month.
Get the first month for $1 by using promo code AMP888.
Welcome to a new era of connecting patriots.
Export Selection