Exclusive Interview With Political Prisoner Zach Rehl And The Engineers Exposed
Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Rumble www.rvmrumble.com or Rokfin FREEShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1 and get 2 EXCLUSIVE Interviews A Week!!!
https://redvoicemedia.com/Uncensored
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
RVM Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/RedVoiceMedia
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior #BreakingNews Show less
I know that you've got a limited time and my audience is aware that you are looking at a sentence of possibly 30 years.
Tell us what's going on, my friend.
Well, yeah, so we actually sentenced, a few of us were sentenced last week, and my sentence officially came back at 15 years, officially, which is absolutely insane.
None of us were convicted of any assault or anything like that on any officers.
I was convicted of knocking over a fence that I didn't even touch, which the judge even admitted this in my hearing.
But the jury convicted me of destruction of property anyway.
And that's actually where the terrorist enhancement came from.
If anybody following along might have heard that we were also given a terrorist enhancement.
The enhancement was for property damage.
And that's real interesting because, you know, like with the terrorist enhancement law, the government, you know, the legislative branch, Congress, they gave a bunch of different examples on the law on what a terrorist enhancement should be used for.
And it was basically, so basically said that, like, you know, if you were convicted of using nuclear weapons to blow up a building or you blew up an airport or, you know, you bombed a government building, things like that.
Those are the type of things that were, you know, supposed to have been used for a terrorist enhancement.
But we were given a terrorist enhancement for a waist-high fence.
And it wasn't even like a real fence.
It was really just a stage prop.
See, like on the Capitol grounds on January 6th, there was construction going on for an inauguration stage for Joe Biden when he was coming in.
And there was this little waist-high fence.
I want to say it looked like a baby gate, you know, like something you use to keep babies out from one room to the other.
And they were using it to just divide seating areas from one area from another.
And that's it.
It was just, it was temporarily put up.
And that fence, that little gate was knocked over on January 6th.
And we were charged with destruction of property for it.
And then when we got our sentencing, we got the terrorist enhancement added on to that.
So that's one of the reasons why we were looking at 30 years to life.
But fortunately, we, not fortunately, but we got 15 years instead of 15 years.
My codefendant Joe Diggs got 17, and Mr. Nordine got 18.
And Enrique Terrio is actually getting sentenced today, and we're just waiting to see what happens with him.
And I believe his max sentence is 33 years, and he was nowhere to be seen on the grounds because he wasn't even there.
Like you stated before, you did nothing violent.
You destroyed no property.
You weren't even involved in the fence incident that they found you guilty for.
This is obviously a kangaroo court.
You cannot get a fair trial in D.C. That's now been proven.
The sentencing is completely egregious.
I would say that even if they had given you time served, that would have been egregious, and you should have sued after the fact.
You're obviously going to appeal this.
You obviously need support.
What are the next steps?
And is there any hope to get this appeal outside of D.C.?
Yeah, so we definitely are taking next steps.
Me especially, I'm aggressively looking to do everything I can to get everything examined and everything looked at.
I just hired a new appeals attorney.
I got rid of my trial attorney, wasn't happy with, but I picked up Mr. Norm Pattis.
He's one of the best at the business for appeals.
He's seen a lot of avenues to attack, so to speak, that we can utilize to either get the sentence overturned or maybe a new trial or things of that nature.
But yeah, we're definitely looking to do everything we can to get this appeal.
We're trying to wait.
We're waiting to see what happens with the Sotario today.
And then we're going to be making some moves and submitting some things very shortly in the coming weeks.
But if anybody wants to follow along or help out, it really does appreciate it.
I really do appreciate it.
I mean, had my military benefits taking over this.
And I was helping to support my family.
So you can follow along on the case or help donate at ZachDefendZach.com.
Give us that again.
Just very loud and clear.
Where can they go to donate?
Defendzach.com.
And that's Z-A-C-H, Defendz Aza C-H.com.
And we update on there too.
We also have a Twitter and a true social page where we try to keep everybody updated on new happenings and everything.
So just to keep everybody filled in.
You know what I mean?
Now, obviously, this is an uphill battle.
You've already spent, in my opinion, an egregious time in prison.
Obviously, if they were going to charge you with anything, it should have been an in-and-out situation.
You shouldn't have been treated like a criminal.
You should have been charged as such.
And really, at best, it should have been a slap on the wrist and possibly a fine.
And instead, they have tried to literally make you guys look like the poster boys for terrorism in this country and villainy.
Just explain to my audience how that is clearly not the case.
And in fact, you know, a lot of the people that did cause violence that day have never even been arrested.
And obviously, we have the agreement like over-the-top example of Ray Epps, but that seems to be the rule rather than the exceptions, Act.
Oh, yeah, absolutely.
And when I say I never thought in a million years I would have served even a day in jail for what went on for my role on January 6th, I mean that.
Like, I legitimately didn't do anything out of the ordinary that day.
I went down there, I went to protest, we walked around.
I did walk in the building after everybody was being allowed in.
I went in 45 minutes after people initially first went in there.
And it's, like I said, though, we were being waved in at that point.
There's thousands of people going inside a building.
And it's a public building at that.
Let's not forget that.
But I didn't break anything when I was in there.
I didn't do anything wrong.
Took pictures.
I took some selfies like everyone else.
And there is a law in the books for that instance.
Like, if you went into the Capitol and you weren't supposed to, it's called parading in the Capitol.
And it's a six-month max misdemeanor.
You know, typically, people usually get a slap on a wrist, they pay a fine, and they go home.
That's it.
But, you know, we were charged with 20-year felonies.
And, you know, The five of us, not only just the 15-12 20-year felony, we were also charged with the seditious conspiracy felony, which is insane as it is.
I mean, that's basically treason.
That's what a suspicious conspiracy basically is.
And I'm a military veteran, so to sit here and say that I committed treason by going to a protest supporting the president of the United States of America at the time.
It's absolutely bogus.
And I can't wrap my head around it even to this day.
So it's a trap and see of justice.
It really is.
And there's no other way to slice it.
And I just, I really hope that Americans are waking up to this and they're starting to see the sentencing disparities between the left wing and the right wing.
And, you know, if you're a Trump supporter and you happen to, you know, go to the wrong protest and what you might be looking at just because you don't think the way the left does.
You know, it's scary, honestly.
It really is.
And, you know, like, if you're not calling your congressperson demanding answers, I mean, you're wrong.
You should really be, everyone should really be demanding answers at this point.
I mean, this can't be allowed to continue.
It really can't, you know.
Well, I think we're in the post-truth world.
And, you know, you talked about the sentencing disparities.
I'd also like to include in that the fact that even the guy they tried to make the face of the insurrection, the Muffin Man, if you will, the QAnon shaman, is it out of jail?
And that should show people.
And I think some of that had to do with the court of public opinion, but even what he was charged with.
I mean, he went out on the floor and obviously took the selfies.
I know, very, very violent.
You know, obviously that was going to stop the certification of the election.
But he's out.
And I think that he's out of there because obviously he wasn't affiliated with the Proud Boys as you were.
And that's another organization that they wanted to heavily demonize Zach.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, you used him as an example.
I mean, I'll make a note that I didn't go in until 45 minutes after he did, you know, and he's out.
He's out.
So it's a great point you make there.
I mean, I didn't go anywhere near the places he went.
I mean, yeah, he went on the Senate floor, this and that, whatever.
I mean, I walked in, I walked around.
I found a bathroom.
I went to the bathroom and I left.
And yeah, he walked all over the place, and he's out.
But, I mean, even so, like, I still don't even think he deserved the time he got.
Because, like I said, the parading in the Capitol, that's a misdemeanor, you know, and it's something that's on the books.
But he got charged with 15-12 as well.
15-12 is the statute code of obstruction of an official proceeding, for those that aren't aware.
And he ended up getting, I believe, four years, but he got out on good time and everything and ended up serving about two and a half, if I'm not mistaken, correct.
But yeah, like I said, and I agree.
You really hit the nail on the head on that one for sure.
Yeah, and again, I don't think he should have served any time.
I have a hard time with anybody serving any real time.
If you did assault somebody, all right, let's do what we do in every other case.
You look at the person's past criminal history and then you charge them and go with it accordingly.
We all know only one person died during, well, not only one person, but one person was murdered that day through violent force, and that was Ashley Babbitt.
The violent force did not come from the protesters.
And try as they might to associate Trump supporters with neo-Nazis and racism.
There isn't any Nazi flags or Confederate flags to be found.
Those are obviously operatives.
Yet they continually try to push that narrative amongst the American public.
And quite frankly, I find it sad that so many are disengaged and really have no idea what these cases are about and what kind of sentences they're dishing out to you guys.
So we talked a little bit about the process of appeals.
How many months before you'll know whether or not you're on the right track to a new trial, Zach?
That's a good question.
Honestly, since the day I was denied bail, I had a feeling that they were going to try and drag this entire case out past the midterm elections.
And I dreaded the fact that they might try and drag out our case, you know, past the 2024 elections.
And I was right about them dragging it past the 2022 elections.
And here we are, the case has gotten wrapped up and everything, but we're on the road to an appeal.
I honestly don't think that I'm going to see a day in court for our appeal until after the election next year.
That's just my opinion.
I've been right about it.
These courts have done nothing.
So you're thinking bare minimum, well over a year to about a year and a half.
That is correct.
Yes.
I mean, but like I said, these courts have done nothing but showed me that they're politically motivated to an extent.
You know, like the DOJ just it's it's ridiculous that the program they're running.
I mean, they really, the DOJ really needs to be examined by a legitimate president.
And I think President Trump gets back in office, he really needs to examine some of the practices that the Department of Justice has been doing and really, really make changes because they've really this is not how our country is supposed to be, you know, running our justice system.
And it's a disgrace what they've done these past two and a half years.
And somebody needs to put a stop to it.
Absolutely.
Give out that website again in this final minute, my brother.
Sure thing.
And it's at defendzach.com.
And anybody who wants to follow along, feel free to subscribe or follow us on Twitter, DefendZach on TrueSocial as well.
Anybody who wants, you know, they can help donate, it goes right to our legal defense fund.
That way we can keep this fight going and make sure that no one else has to worry about getting picked up.
This is conspiracy for going to a protest supporting your president.
So thank you all, and God bless you all, and God bless America.
Zach, thank you so much for joining us and keeping up in good spirits.
I wish we had more time.
I'm going to encourage my audience to hit that website and definitely donate.
This is a long, long process and a battle, and it's one this guy should not have to be.
Thank you for using Global Tell Inc.
All right, everybody.
Shift Gears to Transhumanism00:12:57
I want to shift gears from what's happening not only in this country, but around the world and to the human species in general, because this transhumanist thing is not going away.
It's taking many shapes and forms.
And many of these forms are completely and totally 100% involuntary to the massive amount of the general populace.
They have no idea what's going on.
Like when you release GMO mosquitoes into the ecosphere with human beings, guess what?
That's going to change everything.
A lot of things.
When you introduce modified RNA printed up by biomolecular printers, that's going to change a lot of things.
And this also hooks into the sustainability and climate change agenda.
See, it all leads to transhumanism.
And what do I mean by that?
Well, obviously they told us way back in the day, if anybody can even remember this, we're going to solve world hunger.
Okay.
World hunger is on its way to being solved.
We did it.
We did it, everybody.
We're number one.
That's what they said, right?
World hunger is getting solved from all this genetically modified food.
It's going to last longer and feed the world.
That's not what happened.
No, instead, your food is crap.
It's highly processed.
And the studies show that GMO is a no, no, no.
You want non-GMO if you can get it.
And if you can get it, you're paying a premium for it.
And is it really non-GMO?
Who knows at this point?
Mons Satan and the gang have really poisoned the food supply.
They've taken it a step further.
You know, when we talk about GMO, that's genetically modified organism.
Okay?
I've been saying this for a long time.
GMO people already exist.
And quite frankly, if you go into the post-World War II black programs, that's where you probably see a lot of the GMO human stuff that one day maybe sort of kind of might come out.
It's going to be tough to say.
I'm sure they'll phrase it differently.
But where they genetically modified human beings and did all sorts of chimeric horribles.
We talk about super soldiers and all that thing.
You don't think they've done this?
Come on.
It's not just the United States.
This is really a human problem, right?
So going back to climate change and genetically modified organisms, yada, yada, yada.
You know, they're going to fight disease with the mosquitoes and the malaria.
And Bill Gates loves you.
He loves us, everybody.
He's a lover.
Well, while that's happening, okay, across the board, which is extremely dangerous, and our food supply tainted extremely dangerous for the masses, there's another issue now coming into the fray.
You have lunatics talking about genetically modifying humans so that they're intolerant to eating meat.
And I just want everybody to know that, in fact, that's not the first time that something like this gets suggested.
In fact, our good friend Dennis Bushnell, which we're going to go over extensively in this, again, because we have to, talks about lowering the bridge and genetically modifying humans for that sustainable planet.
To him, you know, they talk, he doesn't really, although, you know, climate change is mentioned in his Blue Tech Forum speech, the idea that we're going to run out of fresh water is much more concerning.
And because of that, we're going to have to genetically modify or lower the bridge, they say, genetically modify our species to live on the planet.
Think about how horrific and over the top all this is.
Who made these people God?
I didn't.
They're certainly not my parents or my parental figures.
Yet, in this society, they've really tried to raise us cradle to grave for a whole lot of dangerous and a whole lot of Johnny nonsense.
So, this guy's talking at a TED forum, of course, where they promote all this madness, okay?
And he's talking human engineering, so we can't consider.
What if people don't want to give up their meat?
We'll just make them give up their meat.
Like, total insanity.
But hey, don't take my word for it.
Take this guy's word for it.
Climate change is one of the biggest problems that we face today.
Millions could suffer hunger, diseases, coastal flooding as a result of climate change.
We may be beyond the point of no return.
Scientists believe these people, look at the craze look in this guy's eyes.
And he probably believes it, man.
He probably believes that we may be on the brink at any moment of total disaster and collapse.
We may already be there.
And the funny thing is, in this, he talks about the geoengineering aspect of it.
And that's why when I made Shade the Motion Picture, my last film, over a decade ago, I focused in on what?
The apex of the pyramid in my eyes, the driving force behind, you know, forget about World Economic Forum Bilderberg, okay, where that once-a-year meeting really brings it all together, really brings it all together behind the scenes.
The most frank decisions and discussions are made, period.
Okay?
And then I said, we've got geoengineering and we've got bioengineering.
And they're bad.
They're bad.
And this guy, point of no return.
The point of no return.
How many times do we have to hear about the point of no return?
I'm so sick of it.
It's really beyond jackassery and ass clownery and complete and total horrible.
But hey, that's just the way it is, right?
We just got to take it because this guy's telling us it might be over.
And by the way, he warns us that bioengineering, or I'm sorry, geoengineering is very dangerous.
So let's just go right to the bioengineering.
All of it's dangerous.
All of it's ridiculous, especially when you have a sycophantic, psychopathic, predator class in charge of it.
That we have no choice but to consider geoengineering.
This is large-scale manipulation of the Earth, such as spraying sulfate aerosols into the ozone layer in order to increase the reflectivity of the planet.
But geoengineering is very, very risky.
Really?
And now he's going to act like they haven't been doing this for decades.
I've seen it for decades.
There have been programs for decades.
Again, it's one of those little like David Blaine magic tricks where they tell you it doesn't exist.
And then they talk about it and say, We're really not doing it.
And then they say, Well, we're kind of doing it, but we're not doing as much as you think we're doing it.
And then later on, we were doing it way more than we told you we were doing it.
Like, what?
They treat you like a child that they don't even really love.
So, so not only are you treated like a child, so you're not even treated by like as a loving parent to the child, like they want to portray government as, or benevolent billionaires, or whoever is in the authoritative, you know, that we're the news media.
No, that they're like literally, you're like a fact.
It's like Oliver.
It's Oliver Twist in this mother trucker.
Come on.
We have never attempted these technologies on such a large scale.
So we could end up destroying the entire ozol layer.
I want to consider a class of solutions that have never been considered before.
That's a lie.
That is just a plain old.
I mean, this guy's probably pretty ignorant of it.
I'm sure he doesn't know who Dennis Bushnell is or this document from 2001 is.
And we're going to play Bushnell after this.
Okay.
Come on, man.
Disable now.
I don't need that nonsense.
So, what do we want to do?
Let's see.
There's a whole lot of bioengineering.
Let's see.
Chimera?
Let's do that.
No, we didn't get that one.
Okay, that's okay.
Sometimes, see, we do it live.
It's okay.
We'll do it live.
Okay.
We'll do it live.
Fuck it.
Do it live.
I'll write it and we'll do it live.
Let's see.
No, that's bio.
There's a lot of bio in here.
So bio nano era.
There's robotization, agriculture.
Might become here.
We go.
There we go.
Genetic engineering before birth.
Okay.
So there it is right there.
They tell you, by the way, that lifespan's going to double.
Just like they told you, you're going to cure cancer.
Everybody's going to be awesome.
And look, here's the virtual reality, holographic, metaverse.
It's all here.
Automation, robotic, everything.
We love you.
Huge cost reduction.
Right?
When they talk about nano, let's get me out of here for a minute.
Living factories.
Oh, okay.
Okay.
What else do we have for bio over here?
Let's keep going down the line.
Here we go.
That's nice.
Look at all the nice little sensors and the holodecks and the robotics and the beyond human AI.
Ooh.
It's the worldwide IT revolution.
Okay.
And they look, they're concerned with that population growth.
Every time we keep going through the document, somewhere here.
All right.
Let's see.
There's the increased lifespan that they're going to allow us to have.
Sure, they are.
Yep.
Mm-hmm.
I mean, here it is right here.
There's going to be no haves or have-nots.
We're going to get rid of the historical religious issues.
Isn't that nice?
People love you.
And here they admit into biological crime, binary pathogens, genetics, the whole night, that they're going to do this if we let them.
And I don't want to let them.
Okay?
Take a look.
Like a cross-species.
That's what it is.
So let's find that.
See, it just came to me.
Cross.
Let's see.
That's a cross.
No.
Across.
There it is right here.
There it is.
Is bio not on this page?
See?
See, sometimes, guys, it takes me a little bit.
Products and life forms, cross-species, molecular breeding, directed evolution.
The genomic design and repair of the human species.
So, so Cubby Spanklerman here, whoever he is, right?
Population Control and Sustainability00:11:36
Chuck E. Cheese.
You don't know what he's talking about.
No way.
Well, he's not the first.
I mean, this is hardcore warfare papers.
Drilling it down.
Future strategic warfare 2025, son.
It's weird that he's bringing this up right around 2023, too.
Hmm.
It's almost like there's a directed narrative or an agenda.
That's some kooky Burmes talk right there.
That's what that is.
That is some kooky Burmes talk.
So let's get back to a little guy.
Human engineering.
It involves the biomedical modification of human beings.
I'll give four examples.
Here's one.
18% of greenhouse gas emissions come from livestock farming.
So if we eat less meat, we could significantly reduce our greenhouse gas emissions.
Oh man, got to get rid of the cows.
Got to get rid of your meat.
They're trying to extract our humanity from us, our literal life force on the planet, and put us into servitude as they direct our evolution.
It's in front of our face.
Now, some people would be willing to eat less meat, but they lack the willpower.
Human engineering could help.
They want to do it so bad.
They just can't because it tastes so damn delicious.
But they want to do it, so we're going to help them out.
Just as some people are naturally intolerant to milk or crayfish, like myself, we could artificially induce mild intolerance to meat by stimulating our immune system against common bovine proteins.
And in this way, we can create an aversion to eating eco-unfriendly food.
And we can do this, for example, by having meat patches.
Kind of like nicotine patches.
People.
Listen, I added a lot of that, but not in the beginning.
The laughter, the cheering in the beginning, that's all real.
Nicotine patch.
Meat patches.
We got a little meat.
You wearing your meat patch today, Teddy?
Hey, Betsy.
I don't see you wearing your meat patch.
And they just want to totally incorporate it into your genetics.
These people are insane.
Okay, and then wear these patches before they go out for dinner to curb their enthusiasm for eating meat.
First of all, I love curb your enthusiasm.
Okay?
And stop with the curb their enthusiasm.
Meat is delicious.
We want people to eat meat.
And meat is part of a healthy diet, sir.
I mean, I just can't even.
I mean, I just.
So here's Bushnell.
We're going to go to Bushnell next.
And this breaks it all.
I mean, from the environment to sustainability to the lowering the bridge, the cross-species, the automation, the brain chips.
This is the guy.
This is the guy.
No brainer.
The ecosystem appears to be crashing.
And again, it's always the Earth.
This is the water angle.
And climate change is the reason.
So it's all climate change, all human beings.
He talks about Malthusianism in this.
Press shortages, you people know that.
That's why you're here.
Species extinctions, the emergence of fragile human-engendered monoculture biomes.
There's the climate change stuff, pollution of all matter, deforestation, loss of topsil, and wildlife habitat.
The humans are practicing anti-terraforming, where terraforming is what you do to make the ecosystem more salubrious for humans.
In fact, prevention of collapse of the ecosystem has now become the overwhelming issue.
Current food production is based on freshwater plants, e.g. glycophytes.
We're running out of fresh water, as you know.
The code word is sustainability.
The crashing of the ecosystem is due to population growth and the way we're now living, our standard of living.
Think about what he's saying right here now.
Again, he's telling you, sustainability is a code word.
And he's going to go into our standard of living and how that's going to drop.
There's a code word for your standard of living dropping.
And it did.
Imagine that.
This is over a decade old.
And over the last decade, has your standard of living gone way up?
Has your family's?
Come on.
The estimates vary between 30 and 50 percent of a planet that we're currently short to sustain the standard of living and the current population, much less the population growth.
As the Asians and their billions come up, as they are at 9 to 11 percent growth rate to Western standards of living, we're going to be short three more planets, and they're not readily available.
This will result in peak everything.
This will result in standards of living plunging.
There's a partial solution to this, and that is to switch to halophyte salt plants grown on wastelands and deserts using saline salt water.
22 nations are doing this.
This literally solves, as I'll get into, land, water, food.
So, guys, think about that.
They also say there's a solution there.
And this is the extended like seven-minute cut.
I mean, think about what he's telling you right there.
Your standard of living is going to plummet.
That's the equalization of the haves or have-nots.
And in the document, it's population stabilization.
But he'll tell you it's Instigate Population Control.
Big difference.
Well, no difference.
It's just to them it's not a difference.
It's just semantics.
So halophytes.
You can grow just on a good portion of the Sahara sufficient biomass to replace all the fossil carbon fuels, to provide petrochemical feedstock for all the plastics anybody wants, and grow enough food so everybody gets to eat and return some of the 68 to 70 percent of the fresh water that's now used for conventional agriculture, as advertised, solves land, water, food, energy, and climate.
So again, if this were the real deal and they cared about you, wouldn't they have this in motion right now?
Hmm?
Or is it too good?
I mean, again, I mean, does it create cheap energy and resources?
Because that's not what they want.
They want control.
Sorry.
So, this is Malthus 101.
These innate ecosystem restrictions and shortfalls will necessarily shift world econometrics from a growth mantra to one of sustainability.
So, again, they tell you now the mantra is sustainability.
Have you noticed that?
Again, he told you this over a decade ago.
And it's your standard of living plummeting.
Malthus 101, what is a life worth with possible population control instigated along the way?
And he's going to say that changes everything.
Okay?
What I need people to understand is again with his little presentation here, okay?
What's it say here?
Equalization of the haves and have-nots.
What's going to change everything?
The stabilization of the world population, the demise of the U.S. underglasses.
So, there he made it a little more harsh.
He lets you know it was going to be population control that they instigate.
Well, I don't get to instigate it.
Who's instigating this?
Who's we?
NASA?
Bushnell?
Is it the Blue Tech Forum?
Well, I mean, and that's when people say, oh, you say they.
I mean, this guy's saying we.
They, we.
Let's go back to Bushnell because, again, we're going to get to where we need to on this whole genetic modification of human beings as well.
It's the excuse for everything, transhumanist.
It's insanity, really.
It changes everything.
After the recent economic burp, people want to see the growth business reinstituted.
It's not.
The final last resort solution is instead of raising the bridge, we lower the river.
Genomically modify the biota, including us humans, to take the heat.
We have ongoing.
Think about what you just said now.
So, again, Cubby over there in TEDx is saying exactly what he's saying.
Bring it back.
Oh, I forgot if I do that.
It goes there.
That's fine.
It's fine.
We're going to go back to Dennis right here.
Instead of raising the bridge, we lower the river.
Genomically modify the biota, including us humans, to take the heat.
We have ongoing studies of extremophiles, biologics, and deep ocean vents and deserts and the yellow zone pools, plus the ongoing biorevolutions, genomics, and synthetic biology that proffers the very real possibility of designing life forms, including humanoids, capable of thriving in whatever mess we make of the planet.
The other time scale here is that we have looked at what it would take to terraform Mars, and it would take about 120 years.
There's enough water under the poles on Mars, under the frozen CO2, to put an ocean on Mars.
A reasonable depth ocean.
Not that deep, but reasonable depth.
And so we could then put stuff in this ocean that grows and produces oxygen, and so we can make a breathable atmosphere.
We still wouldn't have the Van Allen belts to protect us in the radiation, but at least we would have some kind of an atmosphere to protect us from some part of the radiation.
Now think about that.
Now he mentions the Van Allen belts.
And you're not supposed to mention those, Van Allen.
When you mention those Van Allen belts, you're kooky.
You're crazy.
The Van Allen belts protect us from radiation, says the chief scientist at NASA for decades.
But that's only one planet.
We're going to need three, okay, within 40, 50 years, and it would take 120 years to tear floor by ourselves up.
Everything's hilarious.
We're going to genetically modify humans.
Sustainability's coming.
Your standard of living is going to plummet.
We might institute population control.
Merging With Machines00:04:04
In terms of employment, just as an example, we are at a jobless economic recovery.
There's about 7 million jobs missing.
Some of them were globalized and offshore, about a few.
The rest of them are gone.
The code word is productivity improvement, which is a code word for ever better automation and roboticization.
I just love these code words.
So that means unemployment.
If you look at the way the robots are going, human-level machine intelligence from the IPU Boom Brain Project is now about 10 to 15 years up via biomimetics where they've nanosectioned the neocortex and they're replicating it in silicon.
Okay, and they're having great success at all.
So this is not soft computing.
This is biomimetics.
I need people to understand what he's saying.
Biomimetics.
Okay?
Not soft computing, not just large language models.
In other words, they're merging biomaterials in a lot of this stuff.
Okay?
We have looked 20, 30 years out with the way robotics and automation and machine intelligence is going.
And what jobs the machines cannot do?
The answer is none.
We thought we need human touch enlightenment in nursing homes for a while, but the Japanese two years ago, but robots in nursing homes, the patients like them much better than the humans.
Just laughing at their own demise.
And I've talked about this.
Telehealth, robotics, AI, automated health care.
Talk about a biomedical fascistic tyranny, a tiered system.
The machines are creating wealth within the structures of the ecosystem capability.
The machines are reducing costs, okay?
Producing wealth, but the humans increasingly can't compete.
I have a friend, Steve Thaler, who has developed an imagination machine, okay, which is a neural net which he trains and deprives of all rational input.
And this neural net sits there and dreams like people dream, producing new ideas 24-7 through 65 on megawatts.
And he has a critic neural net sitting in the weeds, recording all of these new ideas and checking them out for various problems and metrics.
This thing has produced better toothpaste for Palm Allen.
It has produced better warheads for the Air Force.
And it produces far more ideas far faster and cheaper than buildings full of people.
Buildings full of people.
And Thaler, again, very much in the mix right now, tried to allow AI to have its own patents, this imagination machine that he's talking about.
And we've got to do some more deep dives on Thaler, no doubt about it, because he's at the forefront of a lot of this.
Okay.
So along with all of the other jobs which the machines are, and you know, I've got charts on this, okay?
I have tracked which jobs, which have gone, which ones have come in.
There's a magnificent book on this called Martin by Martin Ford.
It's called Whites in the Tongue.
And if you can sleep well after reading that book, Then you're not quite as sensitive as maybe I thought you were.
Look at it.
He just smiles it up.
It's hilarious.
You can sleep well after the nightmare that I'm proposing.
Good for you.
I mean, you know, what people will do all day is not clear.
What we're doing with these, and this is only one of the seven, okay, is that the machines are taking the chunks.
Internet of Bodies Sensors00:06:11
And the humans increasingly can't compete.
We're also becoming cyborgs, okay?
We have copy implants, artificial retinas, artificial hearts, direct brain depression, communication, brain chips.
We put brain chips into about 10,000 people.
It affects congenitally affected brains.
Doctors working on brain chips are super soldiers.
15, 20 years out, if you don't have a ladies chip-in, you can't compete, particularly with the machines.
So we are merging with the machines.
There's some really massive effects of the IT bio-nano quantum energetics tech revolutions that are now on a double exponential.
Let you know.
And, you know, I just want to bring up the fact that, you know, this is already out there on a micro level.
Okay.
Trans species.
And then, and again, all this stuff from the transgender movement to the climate change movement, like we're just talking about sustainability, equity, all of it is driving us to be less human.
Have, but that humans don't have.
So we are in a stage in history that we can actually design what species we want to be.
I consider myself a trans species because I'm adding senses and organs that other species have.
And you can add many, many more senses that other species have and organs that other species have.
And we'll start seeing this in the 20s because it's now growing.
It's happening on the ground.
There's already many surgeons that are willing to do the surgery anonymously in the same way that in the 50s and 60s, transgender operations were being done a bit underground.
Now, cyborg surgeries are being done a bit underground, but in the end, bioethical committees will also accept that cyborg surgeries should be allowed for everyone that wants to extend their perception of reality, at least to the level of...
There it is.
Just it's going to eventually everybody's going to accept it.
And the next step in this is this internet of bodies that's starting.
Okay, yes, bio-nanotech, geo- and bioengineering.
Absolutely.
But a lot of it is going to be through a sensor system.
He talks about senses.
Well, they already have sensor systems just about everywhere.
In the 20th century, wireless technology integrated with the human body was nothing more than science fiction.
But today, Wi-Fi connected devices like heart rate monitors and sleep trackers have become common parts of American life.
How has bionic technology evolved so quickly from science fiction to reality?
And what could this internet of bodies mean for our lives moving forward?
Brand researchers are studying this phenomenon and what consumers and policymakers need to know as we veer into uncharted territory.
The Internet of Bodies or IOB is actually an ecosystem.
It's a bunch of devices that are connected to the Internet that contain software and that either collect personal health data about you or can alter the body's function.
I mean, first of all, the data collection, notice alters the body's function is also there.
Because there are now implantable devices or wearable devices that essentially, just like a car, has an on-star system.
They can be activated, they can be dosed out, et cetera, et cetera, remotely.
Why would you ever want to give somebody that kind of control over your body?
That's insanity to me.
And then you have the track trace database system of the traditional Internet of Things incorporated with a lot of these sensors and wearables becoming the Internet of Bodies.
That coupled with your medical information, a lot of which is public knowledge, and your you know what, bibbity bobbity boobity bibbity certificates, amongst other things.
Think of the Internet of Bodies as this collection of all these devices as well as all the data that the devices are gathering about you.
And in healthcare, it's Internet of Bodies has been around for quite a while.
With the advent of the Internet, it makes a lot of sense to connect your pacemaker to the Internet so that your doctor can be automatically notified if something weird happens, if there's an anomaly.
It's natural in a lot of ways to want to understand more about your body, how it functions, how well it's doing.
IOB devices could revolutionize healthcare.
Unprecedented amounts of personal health data could inform treatment plans that are completely tailored to a patient's needs.
There are pills now that have an electronic sensor that let a healthcare provider know whether you have taken the medication.
Have you taken the medication?
It says here you have not taken Z medication.
Why are you not taking Z medication?
Other things like precision medicine.
So precision medicine is the idea of creating pharmaceuticals or treatment like specifically for your body, for your personalized treatment.
And I think IOB could really help with that because nowadays a lot of healthcare is based more on, you know, average reactions, whereas with data from IOB devices, you might be able to really more precisely treat a certain disease.
But the Internet of Bodies won't be a cure-all.
In fact.
Of course, it's not going to be a cure-all.
What have they cured lately?
Has our life expectancy gone up?
But you will take the pills and we will tailor the drugs.
You will take the pills.
And we will tailor the drugs.
You will take the pills.
And we will tailor the drugs.
Just saying.
Tailoring Drugs with Data00:04:24
Just throwing it out there.
You know what I'm saying?
I'm just putting it out there.
Just saying.
Oh, boy.
Let's keep going.
The largely unregulated market poses risks to the uniquely sensitive data these devices collect.
First of all, there's the cyber risk of an actor potentially hacking into the system, whatever it might be.
And by the way, forget about the bad actor hacking in.
What if the people that have it from the outset, like the corporations and the pharma companies and the politicians, what if they're the bad guys in the first place?
Forget about the bad actors scenario.
What if they're all bad actors?
There's the privacy risk of all this data that's being collected and the regulations about that data are really murky at the moment.
And so there's not a lot of clarity into who owns the data, what happens to it, who it gets sold to, how it's being used.
And there's even potentially national security and global security risks.
Really?
Wow.
Wow.
Really?
National Security can't imagine.
A few examples of these risks have already played out in real life.
For instance, in 2018, highly sensitive information about U.S. military activity and base locations was inadvertently revealed by soldiers' fitness tractors.
So this is a pivotal moment.
What can we do to make sure we reap the potential benefits of the internet of bodies without risking our privacy, security, and personal autonomy?
Impossible.
You've already done it.
The risk, you've given it up.
You've acquiesced.
You've bent the knee.
Like, I mean, so many of us, inadvertently, I mean, I don't scan my thumb to get on my phone.
I don't even have a passcode.
I don't scan my face, but I'm out here all the time.
And I'd be foolish to think that, you know, my prints aren't somewhere.
I did get arrested and printed once.
And although they were supposed to destroy it, because I don't even think I got like, I got like a ticket.
Like, I think it was getting a misdemeanor.
Do you really believe they did that?
That they destroyed.
Oh, yeah, I'm sure.
I'm sure.
And you know what?
Mickey Mouse, Donald Duck, Woody Woodpecker, Bugs Bunny, and a slew of other cartoon crazy going to walk through that door.
And together, we're going to shoot Who Framed Roger Rabbit 2.
Okay?
And I'm going to be the detective guy this time because I think he's long dead.
That's how realistic that is.
I mean, come on.
Let's get with it.
I mean, we're in imagination land if you don't realize you've already acquiesced and given this up.
Consumers should be wary of IOB devices because as it's becoming more and more popular, all of this intimate data is being collected, arguably more intimate data than we've ever really recorded before.
There's no clarity on what is being done with that data.
You know, with an old mechanical pacemaker, there's no data that was being collected and stored.
And you could look at a history of someone's heart rhythms.
Because policy tends to lag behind innovative technologies like this, it's probably up to the consumers and to the healthcare patients to really be aware of the devices that they're using.
Let them be aware that it's already over, that it's too late, that it's not regulated, that the internet of bodies has begun.
And what is happening to their data and to know what the regulations are in their particular state because it does vary so much state by state.
Even if you think you're not interesting or that nothing will happen with your data, there are a lot of unknowns that I think we need to be careful about.
Yeah, that's an understatement.
Documentary Films Revealed00:00:35
Guys, we have come to the end of the exclusive second hour over at rvmrumble.com on Wednesdays.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
Remember to check out all the documentary films for free.
Loose change final cut, fabled enemies, invisible empire, a new world order to find, and shade the motion picture, all very important films and tools to really help people, I think, awaken to what's really been going on and give them factual information and not a lot of Johnny nonsense and hopium.