Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Rumble www.rvmrumble.com or Rokfin FREEShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1 and get 2 EXCLUSIVE Interviews A Week!!!
https://redvoicemedia.com/Uncensored
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
RVM Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/RedVoiceMedia
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior #BreakingNews Show less
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in blunt.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery.
We need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
I am the great and powerful are known why you have come a human being.
God damn it.
My life has failed.
You have met all the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, tired you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
Machine men, with machine minds and machine hearts!
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Good morning.
Can't believe it's already Thursday.
The week truly flies by, guys.
Britney Spears Success Stories00:13:29
I mean, we cover a lot of topics here.
I know there were some brutal watch-alongs with, you know, Zombie J and Hillary Clinton and the Mad Owl monster.
But I think that we've got snappier stuff today.
Although all that stuff was extremely important.
I really hope that everybody enjoyed the Alex Stein interview from yesterday.
You made your way over to RVMRumble.com where the second hour lives for free.
And check that out.
We had a really great discussion.
And today I wanted to kick it off with some Hollyweird, okay?
And normally, again, sometimes we do, sometimes we don't.
It's certainly not what we focus in on here.
But every once in a while, right, you get your Woody Harrelson story, or we're talking about Jamie Foxx.
Because in my opinion, the story we're covering, it expands into the larger zeitgeist of the population and really the pulse of that population.
All right.
When I say zeitgeist, what's going on?
And fame has always, always, throughout cultures, been a hell of a drug and been promoted.
And unfortunately, when you involve children from a very young age in a system that is utterly so cutthroat and grotesque, most people can't imagine it the vast majority of the time.
The vast majority.
You're going to have nothing but nightmares come out of it.
So specifically, you know, I obviously show a lot of daily mail stories here.
Okay, so the Daily Mail is a great aggregate for news stories.
And on top of that, does a lot of exclusives that no one else is going to touch.
It's Murdoch Media.
You know, I'm not in love with Rupert Murdoch, obviously.
I've had a lot of issues with Fox News, and I think Sky is also theirs over in Europe.
But the amount of content that comes out of it is totally worthwhile.
And like I said, every once in a while, they really do.
They had some great exclusives on the Epstein stuff.
However, in that, you get a lot of tabloid stuff.
In fact, it's a wonder we don't do more tabloid and royal stuff here.
But quite frankly, that stuff nauseates me to no end most of the time.
Okay.
Britney Spears was at the top, and there is, it's this video she put out.
And we're not going to show the video here.
It's just too much.
You know, maybe we could get away with it.
Maybe we couldn't.
I don't really care one way or another.
I'm not showing it.
I'm going to show you some stills.
So, like, apparently she's getting divorced again.
And this is the type of videos that she's like putting out.
And I get it.
She's always been a little risque.
But like, we're talking full, like, like, you're, yeah, you're going to get just a little piece of it.
There we go.
Yeah.
Just, I'm going to block out some of the some of the bootocks.
You know what I'm saying?
Like, so, why is it your business, Jason?
Why is this what you're bringing up?
Okay.
There was a large campaign to talk about Britney Spears, and a lot of people were talking about the mind control aspects of Hollyweird and the abuse.
And this is a Disney kid.
This is very much an MIC, K-E-Y-M-O-U-S-C.
Remember that one, kids?
I do.
Because it was embedded in my head.
Again, I'm from another generation.
But like, my generation and the subsequent one also were the first ones to get all these channels.
The Disney channel was big.
That's really where the phenomenon popped off where Disney and even entertainment's expansion into the kids' arena exploded.
Now, a lot of it was geared to kids before, but not only did you have the Mickey Mouse Club, but now you have the entire network, right?
And it was like a mirror image of Disney, which also was exploding at the time and introduced in my generation.
And what chance does somebody like that have when they're surrounded by people like this?
Now, Dan Schneider and Britney Spears here, that's not the main go-to.
However, if you read what's above me, that's Jamie Lynn Spears.
Again, what kind of chance does that kid have in the future?
And has already had a ton of trouble.
Let's just say she had a teenage pregnancy, and a lot of people say a lot of things about some creepy folks.
I mean, you take a look at a guy like that, and that's the kind of person that you're surrounded by in the entertainment industry.
Now, there's the antithesis of that, too.
There's the really slick, good-looking folks that you think are going to be the best, and they're just as perverse and quite frankly, demonic.
They're just as bad.
Because, like, when you're looking at somebody like this, okay, and there's a multitude.
I've done videos on Dan Schneider before.
This isn't even going to be a Dan Schneider video.
I just want you to realize that this guy, for all he's been accused of, not in jail, probably has tens of millions of dollars, has taken sort of a back seat on the Hollyweird scene.
But if he's guilty of any of the crimes that he's been accused of, he has never paid the price for those crimes.
Not once, right?
So, what kind of a chance does Britney Spears have?
So, you know, there was this whole Free Brittany movement and the conservatorship.
But what I don't think people understand is how damaged this person is.
Can you imagine, first of all, why in the world would you put your children through this?
You know, that speaks to the fact that you have a system where obviously the parents aren't looking out for the kids.
And this is her latest husband who apparently is about to divorce her because it's going to be very difficult for her to have any kind of a real intimate relationship when she's beholden to a system where she constantly has to have attention and she constantly has to maintain an image and she constantly has to sexually exploit herself.
Okay?
So apparently this is over right here.
I guess see what I mean?
Like you're a woman, I believe, who's about 40 and you're supposed to be marrying your husband and that's what you're doing.
You're grabbing, I mean, come on, there's a time and a place, right?
And we're not going to go back down to that.
But how could this person ever have a chance?
Like, I mean, take a look at the thumb, guys.
You know, this is when she's, you know, a teenager, very young, before the huge music career that she's going to maintain.
But that picture right there, which is a little bit suggestive, I could have easily used a much more explicit, okay, exploitive photo of her as a young girl because they're out there.
And Britney's just one of the ones we get to see that made it.
Can you imagine all those, you know, part-time actors, bit players, side pieces?
We see it all the time, kind of in the back doors of the headlines.
This is in the forefront.
And what kills me is so many people still aggrandize the entertainment industry and would not only desperately want to be a part of it themselves, okay, but they want their children to be a part of it.
Now, I guess there's some people out there that somehow, some way, very strong personalities, very strong people have overcome the adversity of being a childhood star and maintained a career in Hollyweird that I guess doesn't have the type of scandal that Britney Spears and so many others have.
The drug abuse, the sex abuse, who knows?
Who knows the vices beyond?
I could name one right now.
Christian Bale has been around.
He was the main guy, the main child star in Empire of the Sun, which is really still an incredible movie to this day.
And he's maintained his career.
He's an incredible actor.
You can't take away from his craft.
You know, I think who is it, Elijah Elijah Wood is another one.
There's some people out there, Frodo, that have been able to do it.
But there are always these dark tales about the others that don't make it.
And there are always these people within the machine, whether it be Disney or Nickelodeon or Viacom, right?
Or Paramount, Warner Brothers.
The list goes on, or does it, by the way?
I'm going to talk about that in a minute.
And, you know, that's the dirty little scene.
In fact, Bill Maher brought that up.
That's a clip I should have found.
Let's see if we can find that right now because we do it live.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
It's one I forgot about.
I could have had going for the intro, but Bill Maher, I think it was on Club Random, talked about, I believe it was Judy Garland.
Let's see.
Judy, let's see, Bill Maher, Judy.
Man, we're not.
Wait, is this it right here?
Yes, Shirley Temple.
That's the one.
I think this is in the shorts.
So this was like a couple years ago.
Here we go.
We got it.
We did it, guys.
We found it.
Look at that.
Live and on time.
Let's get that out of the way.
Here we go.
Temple.
When you read her book, you can read between the lines.
Oh, of an Richard Dreyfus with him, by the way.
An enormous scandal.
Well, a scandal that never unscandalized.
She was abused.
Oh, yeah.
I'm sure.
I mean, that's basically what she said.
What she was was that they made as much as they could of a never-acknowledged ongoing sin.
You know, it's not that she was abused in the sense that bad behavior on the part of Louis B. Mayer.
It's that that was the done thing to everyone.
Judy Garland, I'm sure.
You know, I mean, yeah, they were just men without guardrails.
And they invented the American small town perfect place.
Think about that, guys.
Judy Garland, Shirley Temple.
Again, that's an older generation.
Perhaps mine's the last that remember those names.
But that's Richard Dreyfus talking about it with Bill Maher and men without guardrails.
And, you know, the, and even, I mean, one of the abusers seems to be named by Richard Dreyfus, but he's like, I'm not even blaming that abuser per se because it's such a culture in Hollyweird.
It's such a culture of exploiting children, especially young girls.
And look, we know it's not just young girls.
We know the abuse that happens to young boys, don't we?
Don't we, Brian Singer?
Hmm.
And in fact, the tweet where I found that, to make a quick point about that, was from An Open Secret.
That is an excellent documentary film that exposes this behavior in Hollyweird.
We're going to come back on the other side.
We're going to talk about a possible Apple and Disney merger, or really Apple buying Disney.
That's scary.
And I'm going to explain why in a moment.
We'll be back after this.
MyPillow Update00:03:07
When I invented my pillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you.
And 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going.
Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition My Pillow.
The Giza Elegance My Pillow is made with my patented adjustable film, the most amazing cotton and a two-inch pipe cusset.
It has four custom mop levels, machine-washable and dryable, and you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
Go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary MyPillow queen size.
Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
That's right.
Get a queen-size MyPillow for only $19.98.
From all of us here at MyPillow, we are back.
It is Reality Rance.
We don't even have 50 thumbs up.
Can we get the thumbs up?
I want to remind everybody the second hour is over at RVMRumble.com.
Please go check it out over there.
Give it a subscribe.
And remember, you can support the broadcast at redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored sign up for a buck for the first week.
It is $10 a month after that.
We're locked in at $100 for the year.
And you're going to get those exclusive interviews before everybody else, not just the little snippets we play here.
Amongst them will be the Jay Dyer heavy metal breakdown, in which I really love the fact that we can look at quote-unquote art that also has a lot of predictive programming elements, especially when it comes to robots, transhumanism, science fiction becoming science fact, that type of thing.
So, really great discussion with him.
I'm going to be on the road next week.
I'm going to have to be doing some pre-records over the weekend.
I'm going to hopefully be hitting the road Tuesday evening.
We'll see.
I got to see about my car and whether or not I'm going to be able to get my brakes done.
I guess if I don't get my brakes done on that Tuesday, I'm going to have to fly out to Vegas, which I really don't want to do.
But I'm going to be out in Vegas for several days.
Speaking at the Reawaken America Tour, I promise I'm going to have a banger, if you will, a banger of a presentation for everybody on not only transhumanism and Elon Musk and the transgender movement, but some of the latest stuff regarding biometrics, AI, and blockchain people, where this is all going.
And we're actually going to discuss a lot of that later in the broadcast.
Got a lot of clips queued up.
Got some documents open as well.
Okay.
I want to come back just for a second to this story I was just alluding to before the break.
Okay.
Why This Would Be Terrible00:04:43
Apple buying Disney is no longer as crazy an idea as it was.
Okay.
And it's some ludicrous number.
Okay.
There was speculation back in 2006.
I think it's like $168 billion.
What was the number I read?
See, you're looking at this.
And why would this be terrible?
Boy, would this be terrible.
First of all, there's already a massive influx.
If you look at these companies, they all run advertising on each other's networks when it comes to films and TV shows and streaming services.
All of them.
$160 billion.
$160 billion for Disney.
Now, the thing that worries me about this is they already have such, both of them have a cult-like following.
Everybody's worried about the orange man and his cult-like following.
Disney's got a huge cult-like following, and Apple has a huge, huge up.
Like, I got to tell you, a lot of people will tell you that I'm biased against Mac and Cheese and all that kind of shenanigans.
It's tough for me to really like Apple.
Everybody's like, they just work, Jason.
They just work.
Do they?
Because I've worked in a lot of areas where there were Macs and I had to do it for my job.
Cooperstown Dreams Park would be one of them.
When I was in college, I had to learn on Macs because they didn't have PCs.
And really, 25 years ago, when I was first introduced to this stuff, kind of as a teenager, 18, 19 years old, I didn't understand.
There's nobody teaching me that the equivalent or better could be built for half or three-quarters the price on a PC.
See, everything's just easier, Jason.
They just work, Jason.
I don't have time, Jason.
They're convenient, Jason.
And so, you know, they were pushed and promoted and created this whole ecosystem.
And my professor loved, him.
Loved him.
Couldn't get always talking about him, never mentioning a PC.
Didn't hurt.
They also gave him some nice little freebies along the way.
Hey, hey, comrade.
And then Apple launches the first touchscreen smartphone of any significance.
You know, there's some other stuff early on out there.
You know, there's obviously the Blackberries and all that, you know, the flip phones.
That was the phone of the day.
But eventually, obviously, there becomes the Google competitor.
And for me, there's no, it's not even close for the bang for your buck on those devices.
Not, it's not, and what you're able to do.
I mean, iPhones are nice.
I get it.
I get they're very nice phones.
None of them allow you to even implement extra storage.
That you think it costs them that much more to put an SD card slot in there?
No.
Instead, they want to charge you $100 plus dollars for every tier of storage.
When storage has become cheaper and faster over the last 20 years, and it was almost 15 years ago, I was discussing micro SD cards that are still the norm, by the way, the size of my pinky, like pinky nail, size of my pinky nail, that then were holding half a terabyte to a terabyte.
I believe today you can get a two-terabyte one.
Hmm.
Terabytes, not gigabytes, guys.
Terabytes.
Nope.
Not in the Apple ecosystem.
So their brand is selling you on, in my opinion, easy bullshit.
They don't want to teach you how you can be more self-sufficient.
They don't want to teach you how you can upgrade your stuff much more cheaply, efficiently, and easy through a PC.
I mean, there are a lot of frustrations.
Obviously, people saw them over in the last couple weeks when it comes to, I guess, technology in general.
But think about this.
Like, when you walk into an Apple store, this always annoyed me about any kind of like store.
Especially back in the mall days when the malls were hopping.
They're much less hopping now.
Arrogance And Atmosphere00:05:50
But kind of like the arrogance and atmosphere of some of these places.
Like they're totally out of touch.
And so when I walk in to An Apple store, I don't need to be told by somebody with a lanyard around their neck, okay, that's going to scan something that they're a genius.
You're at the genius bar.
What?
The genius bar?
No, I'm not.
Because if they were smart, they wouldn't be working at a place that at the time they would have been lucky to make $12 an hour.
The genius bar?
The hell are you talking about?
But again, people were trained not to learn their technology, not to know how to work the magic boxes of various sizes.
And boy, you are smart, Skipper.
You're a genius.
No.
So then you have that merging with Disney, another huge brand, which, you know, before the last five or 10 years had never been questioned about anything.
And now, because they're pushing agendas so hard, it's hard not to notice it.
But remember, Disney has had an adult brand forever in Miramax, which is the Weinstein vehicle.
And hands down, a lot of the stuff that Miramax put out back in the day is some of the best, in my opinion, films.
That doesn't mean that Harvey Weinstein and others working in Hollywood aren't demons.
Okay?
That, and the fact that you know Disney has worked with the military-industrial complex pre-World War II.
I mean, the propaganda films they were putting together with Donald Duck that we've discussed on this broadcast before show that.
And then the fact that the Central Intelligence Agency helped them scoop up land for Disney World down in Florida should show that.
And then all the special privileges that have gone on via Disney and Florida show that.
By the way, DeSantis is starting to back off the Disney thing.
Have you noticed that?
It's in the background now.
Wonder why, oh, running for president.
You know, because these people realize, again, the masses are part of this really like celebritard worship culture.
I hate it.
And I'm not innocent, by the way.
I like entertainment.
You know, meeting somebody, I guess, that's in Hollywood or whatever.
I'm sure I'd shake a hand.
I don't think I'd take a picture.
I don't take a picture of much.
I actually have met a lot of people, and that's just not.
I don't need the selfie.
I had the moment, right?
I have the historical record in my head.
It's not a break, you know, I'm not, I don't need a name drop.
And like I said, that's not, I'm not trying to demonize everybody in every system.
There are good people working in bad systems.
And like I said, sometimes great pieces of art come out of some really bad systems.
But when we're talking about kids, and kids especially, have been indoctrinated into both Apple and Disney.
My niece, my God, she's an iPhone girl.
I'm like, you're an iPhone girl?
First of all, my oldest is 14.
The idea that you're getting a choice, you want to pay for it.
Okay, but who's paying for it?
I'm an iPhone this and I this.
And she begged me for an iWatch.
Oh boy.
She didn't want anything else.
That was it.
Does well in schools.
You did just get a job.
Got her the eyewatch.
I'm an Apple this.
I mean, again, for a guy like me, the phones, the peripherals, the watches, I think they work better.
I think you have more choice with other brands, but that's just me.
Think about it this way.
It's not like Android or even Google have the type of following cult-like that Apple is.
No one's lining up around a building for days to get the new Google phone or a brand of Android or any other competitor, Samsung, blah, They're not.
But for some reason, this tech company, they are.
And now Apple TV and Apple Originals, they're in the entertainment industry.
And a lot of people have tried to copy them.
Amazon's tried to launch a phone.
Facebook's tried to launch a phone.
Not happening.
Not happening.
And then with the Disney stuff, you know, you've got indoctrination again.
Like I said, I was going pre-World War II, so we're talking about my grandparents' generation that started.
And these are songs and characters that have been embedded into the minds of tens of millions and passed down to tens of millions more.
The Disney Ears logo is one of the most recognized logos globally, along with Coca-Cola.
So man, a merger like this or a buyout like this just shows you less and less choices and more and more people who've already been indoctrinated into the culture of these entities and these mindsets and whatever they put out.
So I'm raising, I'm sounding the alarm on this one.
Just want to put that out there.
Scooped Anthrax Strain Revealed00:15:19
All right, we're coming up on the second break.
We're going to shift gears to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. talking about anthrax post-9-11 with the Tuck-ins.
And then we're probably going to show a segment of Fabled Enemies on the anthrax attacks to kind of emphasize what he's saying.
And Tuck goes, wait a minute, really?
Really?
Yeah, really?
Everything RFK Jr. breaks down here is 100% spot on.
You know, Robbie Martin has done some of the best work on the anthrax issue, but the anthrax issue was really there to hammer home any kind of remaining dissent after the 9-11 attacks.
Very obvious.
Very obvious in retrospect.
The fear, the delivery, the fact that, you know, specifically in the letters, it was associated with 9-11.
And then the anthrax coming from a bioweapons lab in the United States for T-Trick.
Weird.
And then finding out what the Bush administration had already been on Cipro, a preventative for anthrax prior.
Weird.
Weird.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
And we will be back after this word from our sponsor.
We interrupt today's programming to bring unfortunate news.
Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
Don't be fooled.
It won't benefit you.
So take action now.
The Federal Reserve Space Deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
Be prepared.
This may catch many off guard and put your hard-earned assets in jeopardy.
But here's the good news: there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
Speak to someone at American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar and volatile markets.
Double 833, the number two USA gold.
Yes, call now.
833-287-2465.
This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
Don't let the fight force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
Call 833, the number two USA gold.
Yes, call now 833-287-2465.
Swiftly, 833-287-2465.
And we are back at Israelity Rance.
I am Jason Burmes.
Remember, the second hour lives over at RVMRumble.com.
That's where you caught the Alex Stein interview yesterday.
If you came on over, you can support the broadcast at redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
And with that being said, let's play this clip now of RFK Jr. discussing the anthrax attacks with the Tuckens.
You know, these are the same people who got us in the Iraq war.
I know.
Look at what happened.
Let's just let me go through what happened in Iraq.
Just for give me one minute to summarize.
We were tricked into Iraq by the neocons who told us that Saddam had something to do with the World Trade Center, which was a lie.
He had planted the anthrax attacks that came five days after the World Trade Center, which was a lie.
That turned out to be, you know, let's just stop it right there.
Let's just, because they're talking about the neocons and our good buddy, one of the big neocons, and look, this was a mentor to Tucker Carlson back in the beginning, you know, and Tucker has had his meaculpa and called Bill Crystal out for the monster that he is.
But this guy is continuing.
I mean, first of all, he's, you know, attacks anything Trump.
But talk about a never-Trumper.
But here he is.
He's launching his nice little pro-war advocacy group.
He wants us to get even further entrenched in this Ukraine conflict.
He is one of the absolute worst.
One of the absolute worst.
I just had to bring that up because these people haven't gone away.
They haven't been punished for their crimes.
This is why we need to declassify everything 9-11 and start punishing criminals.
Okay?
That's what we need to be doing.
Intelligence agencies in the U.S. military at Fort Dietrich.
That anthrax, the FBI found, came from Fort Dietrich.
So it was somebody in the U.S. government who sent it to Patrick Leahy and Tom Dash, who were the two senators in the week after 9-11 who were trying to block the Patriot Act.
And it shut down Congress and the Patriot went through.
And so, so the and then they really?
Yeah.
Yes.
And the FBI, after a year of investigation, traced the anthrax.
It was a kind of Ames anthrax that was weaponized.
And the only source of that in the world could be the U.S. government.
And they traced it to Fort Dietrich.
Is there a bio lab there?
Yes, the biolab at Fort Dietrich, the CIA biolab at Fort Dietrich.
So somebody sent that in at the time the Patriot Act was being debated.
And the two leading guys who were blocking it was Patrick Lee and Tom Dashall were the recipients of it.
They shut down Congress.
The Patriot Act goes through.
And what does the Patriot Act do?
Two things.
I mean, it basically gets rid of a large part of the United States Constitution Bill of Rights and allows spying by intelligence agencies on the American people.
And it reopens the bioweapons arms race because bioweapons were shut down in 1969 by Nixon to this incredible thing.
And remember, politically useful tools are discussed in the form of bioweapons and specific genotypes via what?
the neocon document from the Project for a New American Century, or PNAC, Rebuilding America's Defenses Just Prior.
Closing for Dietrich, shutting them down, and saying we're no longer making bioweapons, and then got everybody to sign a treaty in 73.
Well, to abandon bioweapons.
The Patriot Act has a provision in it that says we're not walking away from the Geneva Convention, which makes you, it's a hanging offense to develop bioweapons.
Thank you.
We're not walking away from the bioweapons charter of 1972, 1973.
But we are adopting a new rule that any federal official who violates those acts cannot be prosecuted.
So it reopened it effectively.
Isn't that lovely?
Isn't that how they do it?
An inversion of truth, an inversion of reality.
Okay, let's do this.
This is the old fabled enemies.
That's the building.
Oh, there it is right there.
Building 7 section.
And there's the anthrax.
So look at this.
We're going to get right into it.
Maybe we should play a little bit of the building 7 section.
I mean, this is where, you know, again, just weird on 9-11.
They told us that the whole back is scooped out.
And then I have this video on 9-11 of the back of the building in World Trade Center, Building 7, where they're going.
It's not scooped out.
Remember, it was the scoopings?
And the first time they said, what, it was an old, it was a fuel tank that blew up.
Then they said, no, no, no.
Then I think it was a global expansion of the beams, something like that.
Some kind of ludicrous thing from NIST after they totally ignored it in the initial reports.
So yeah, I think we're going to start here.
So probably a good place to start.
Can we get a hundred thumbs up?
A hundred thumbs up-ins.
That'd be helpful.
All right, let's do it.
Again, here you are looking at World Trade Center Building 7 in the back.
That's supposed to be completely and totally scooped out.
And that's up to the main part of the lobby.
All right.
It appears it is not scooped out after all.
Members of the media were reporting that the building had collapsed due to structural damage and fire more than 20 minutes prior to it going down.
Now, more on the latest building collapse in New York.
You might have heard a few moments ago talking about the Salomon Brothers building collapsing.
And indeed, it has.
Apparently, that's only a few hundred yards away from where the World Trade Center towers were.
And it seems that this was not a result of a new attack.
It was because the building had been weakened during this morning's attacks.
We'll probably find out more now about that from our correspondent, Jane Stanley.
Jane, what more can you tell us about the Salomon Brothers building and its collapse?
The building can clearly be seen in the background as Jane Stanley reports its demise.
Jane, I think many of us, when we heard the news, perhaps on the radio earlier today, were the feed would be cut before the building collapsed.
And just couldn't comprehend it.
I mean, it almost sounded too far-fetched.
I was wondering what it felt like for you being in Manhattan.
Well, unfortunately, I think we've lost the line with Jane Stanley.
They called me down.
I think it was part of the 9-11 Commission.
They asked me the same questions that you guys are asking me.
Weird.
The basic questions of why you were blown up in Building 7 and what happened during it.
And no, Barry Jennings isn't a part of the 9-11 Commission report.
Neither is Building 7.
And at that point, they said, okay, thank you.
They sent me on my way.
And yeah, you told them pretty much everything you just told us.
You were in the building, got rocked by an explosion, all that.
Yes.
And you know that they didn't mention Building 7 once in the Commission report.
I told them that's where I was.
It was very, to tell you, it was very scary because they looked like very important people that were questioning me about certain things.
I don't know if they liked the answers I gave.
I could care less.
I gave my account of it, the truth, and that was it.
That day, I'll never forget.
And the explanations that were given to me is totally unacceptable.
Totally unacceptable.
I'm just confused about one thing and one thing only.
Why World Trade Center 7 went down in the first place.
I'm very confused about that.
I know what I heard.
I heard explosions.
The explanation I got was it was the fuel oil tank.
I'm an old boiler guy.
If it was a fuel oil tank, it would have been one side of the building.
And now, the anthrax attacks.
Let's back up what RFK Jr. just said.
December 9-11, a climate of fear was created in order to shut down any opposition to the Bush administration's new agenda.
A week after 9-11, anthrax began appearing in the mail.
The letters were made to look as though they were the work of Muslim extremists, claiming, death to America, and Allah is great.
Now, if you remember, these anthrax letters, they were written to appear to be from semi-literate Muslims.
Very crude handwriting, all of this, all of that.
They really do look more like movie prop letters than real letters.
The targets were government buildings, media outlets such as CBS, NBC, the New York Post, and politicians such as Senator Dashel and Leahy, two members of the opposition party.
When the FBI tested the anthrax, it was highly refined and weaponized.
Colin Powell would go on CNN and deny these allegations.
I think we've had a lot of stories over the past four or five days.
First, it was weaponized anthrax, then it was highly refined, and then when it was analyzed, it was discovered it was none of the above.
The anthrax used in the attacks was identical to that of the AIMS stream, which led the investigation of Fort Dietrich.
An analysis of the anthrax that was sent to Senator Dashel's office shows that this anthrax has a sophistication that leads people to know that it could only be produced by a PhD microbiologist, and it would have to be done in a small, well-equipped microbiology lab.
This appears to be the so-called AIMS strain.
That was a strain of anthrax that was first isolated almost 50 years ago at a U.S. Department of Agriculture diagnostic lab in Ames, Iowa.
What's uncommon about this is that it has been engineered in such a way to be, as they say, readily aerosolized.
That means, in effect, that what somebody has done is taken the anthrax spores, added to them some kind of a chemical to get in the way of a normal electrostatic process that causes the spores to clump together.
Chemicals have been added to declump them, in effect.
That makes them very fine.
They are able then to be dispersed very readily into the air.
The Washington Post would report, genetic fingerprinting studies indicate that the anthrax spores mailed to Capitol Hill are identical to stocks of the deadly bacteria maintained by the U.S. Army since 1980.
Those labs can trace back their samples to a single military source, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Dietrich, Maryland.
It's been made quite clear that Al-Qaeda wasn't behind this.
It is a specialized biological weapon only produced by our military in one facility.
High-level FBI and CIA officials said none of the 60 to 80 daily threat reports from intelligence sources contain evidence linking the anthrax attacks to Osama bin Laden's terrorist network.
This did not stop the mainstream press from trying to blame al-Qaeda.
As investigators race to find answers to the recent wave of anthrax terror, we'll look at what investigators are targeting now.
Bin Laden's Terror?00:13:53
Since September 11th, Americans have been put on alert.
This is so terrible.
Investigators are trying to ward off more attacks by dissecting the terrorist plan for September 11th, looking for patterns, methods, associates that could reveal what else terrorists had in mind.
It was not something smuggled in from Iraq.
It was not something smuggled in from any Middle Eastern country.
It was U.S. government ultra-fine granulated weaponized anthrax spores.
There was another story that the media absolutely would not touch, the story of Dr. Philip Zach.
And it goes back to the U.S. government lab where the anthrax was stored.
It was reported that official U.S. government documents in the anthrax investigation showed that Dr. Zach had entered the laboratory where the anthrax used in the letters was kept without proper authorization after having lost his job.
Somehow, the Bush administration would have the foresight to be on Cipro six weeks prior to the attacks.
How convenient.
An attack traced back to U.S. government facilities, and the president and his staff happen to be taking the antidote before it's even in the mail.
Wild.
Wild.
There's a little bit more judicial watch.
Listen, we're going to go to a word from our sponsor.
We're going to come back to the final segment of the first hour, second hour free over at RVMRumble.com.
Don't forget to check it out.
Attention, Americans.
Breaking news.
Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
Don't be fooled.
It won't benefit you.
Take action now.
The Federal Reserve phase deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
Be prepared.
This may catch many off guard.
Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
Visit protectfrombiden.com.
This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
Be smart.
Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
Visit protectfrombiden.com to get your free guide and get started.
Again, that's protectfrombiden.com.
We are back.
Final segment of the first hour.
It is Reality Rance.
I am Jason Burmes.
A few other stories that I want to hit before I go back to doing some videos and talking to you guys.
Heavy on the transhumanism when I get there.
But there's some 9-11 stuff that I want to wrap up.
Seeing as we just saw the anthrax section and a little bit of the Building 7 section, architect of architect of 9-11, Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, and fellow co-conspirators may be spared death penalty under new plea deal being considered by federal government.
Folks, this has been going on for 20 plus years now.
The case 20 plus years to try to prove these people guilty in military tribunals after having them at black sites where they were tortured.
This is a charade.
This is a facade.
Ayman al-Zawahi, who is on video with Bin Laden pre-9-11, was still roaming the streets for how long?
Was still out.
This is a facade, a facade.
Now, I want you to think about something for a second.
You just watched an excerpt from a film that I put out 15 years ago.
Now, that right there, aside from RFK Jr. pointing out the fact that Dashel and Leahy, both not just opposition party, but were giving trouble to the Patriot Act.
They also went after Dashel, I think, for taxes at the time.
Hadn't paid his income tax or something like that.
He quickly did that after the fact and stepped in line.
I had more data and information.
And finally, 15 years later, after that's out there, and I was far from the first to be talking about anthrax.
I want to make that extremely clear.
And I was talking about it for years before I put it in that film.
15 more years for that to make it on the internet with two mainline personalities, RFK Jr. and the Tuckens.
And I have not watched the entire interview with RFK Jr. and the Tuckens.
I've been so damn busy.
I'm going to try to.
It seems extremely interesting.
But we've got to start getting into 9-11.
We've got to start rolling into that reality because, you know, this is one of the drills that happens just prior to 9-11.
And these are some of the drones and satellite technology that they're utilizing before 9-11.
And you've got Bin Laden on the cover of Amalgam Virgo 01.
Okay.
And if you look at this, this is based on perceived threats.
So this whole idea that they caught, they caught us off guard because they hate us for our freedoms.
Now, was told, we never envisioned, no, you ran drills of it prior to 9-11.
Planes hitting the Pentagon.
White papers on the World Trade Center as a target.
You knew it was a target.
You put out Bin Laden as the main boogeyman.
There he is again, the world's most dangerous terrorist.
And then right above him, it's oh, Saddamster.
And then over here, you had Kim Jong-u-il.
They notice a little Stalin right there, just a teeny Stalin.
We're moving away from Russia a bit.
Moving away from Russia.
Getting ready for a little bit of China action, though, down here.
I mean, these guys, missile technology is proliferating in the hands of rogue nations and terrorist organizations as a nation.
We must research and develop options to combat these emerging threats.
And really, if you look at this, Amalgam Virgo, all right, you see a lot of drone stuff, a lot of aerial stuff going on, a lot of communications everywhere.
Fighters, tankers, radar, port security.
It's all right here.
And then they're already talking about the gray areas.
Who is responsible?
Come on.
So, you know, as you're looking at all these different little communications, don't worry.
We're going to get to kamikaze airliners into the Capitol.
But again, they didn't know.
They had no idea.
And they had no idea about the anthrax.
They had just no clue.
All right.
So if you look, you can actually see some of the exercises and what days some of these things are actually going to be deployed.
Notice terrorist attack.
Terrorist attack.
Terrorist attack.
Right there.
Okay.
Terrorist attack.
And these are our defenses.
Okay.
It's internal inside the United States.
They always, we're always looking at threats from the external.
Okay.
Sure, you were?
You're a liar.
And they just lied and lied and lied.
And we let them lie and lie and lie.
And say things like, well, conventional wisdom would have you believe.
When they finally fasted up to it years and years later.
Years and years later.
And this was a slow burn.
Okay.
You know, drone safety procedures.
You notice this.
You got Wellstone down here.
All right.
And then you have some of the drones up on the top.
Okay.
Then you got rage control, the director.
You got the drone commander.
You got drone control.
You've got the picture.
You have the total air picture.
Then you got the satellite picture.
You see this?
And again, this is 20 plus years ago they're doing this.
NORAD, AV proposal guidelines.
And by the way, we sum up this right here.
Hijack scenario.
There it is.
Airliner right to the Capitol.
No, they had no idea.
And they didn't put Bin Laden on the cover.
Jason, you conspiracy guy.
You, you nut.
You nut.
And, you know, I learned about this yesterday.
I've been staying away from a lot of the stuff on Hawaii.
I know there's a ton of stuff out there, but I'm going to throw just a little bit more of my two cents in there.
Actually, I discussed it a little bit with Alex Stein.
If you were watching the second hour yesterday, and I was talking about blast wave accelerators, and you're about to see what a blast wave accelerator actually looks like at a moment.
But I was doing an interview with Zach Payne yesterday over, I think he's over at Badlands Media.
And he mentioned to me, and I hadn't heard this yet, that the sirens didn't go off.
And not only didn't the sirens go off, but a lot of these kids that were in schools as this went on were sent home that day.
And most of the parents were at work.
So Zach was telling me that a bunch of the, you know, there's a thousand plus missing with a death toll of over a hundred, that most of these are going to be children.
And then that kind of turned my stomach.
And then he said that the island sirens, their emergency sirens, which I believe I became familiar with the sirens when there was that fake nuclear attack alert.
Remember that?
When all those people got that on their phones, that oh my god, there's going to be some kind of nuclear strike in five or six minutes, and then the sirens were actually going off, but they didn't implement them at all.
That's pretty bizarre, and it's certainly something worth looking at.
Now, this guy's saying that it, you know, he's defending his decision.
Okay, let's see what's we are here to provide you with the latest information and updates from the county and the state relating to the wildfires throughout Maui.
So, the question is around siren use.
Clarification on that: Do you regret not sounding the sirens?
I do not.
And the reason why, and so many people said they could have been saved if they had time to escape.
The sirens, as I mentioned earlier, is used primarily for tsunamis, and that's the reason why many of them are found.
Almost all of them are found on the coastline.
The public is trained to seek higher ground in the event that the siren is sounded.
In fact, on the website of the Hawaii Emergency Management Agency, the firing guideline is provided.
If you are in a low-lying area near the coastline, evacuate to high grounds.
Have you sounded the siren that night?
We're afraid that people would have gone mauka.
And if that was the case, then they would have gone into the fire.
And so that is the reason why our protocol has been to use WEA and EAS.
So, again, I mean, you got to make your own decisions.
That's what they're saying.
You know, lest all voices be heard.
Still a little funny.
Now, by the way, I just want to say this: I'm not sitting here saying anything about dues or this and that and the involvement.
I have no clue.
I'm sitting back, hanging back, waiting for the evidence to unravel.
People have to give me compelling arguments.
However, I really want people to understand, and we've shown this many times.
We're going to do it first.
Blast.
Blast wave accelerators.
There we go.
So there it is.
Global precision on the cheap.
What is it?
No barrel, 200 feet notched rail, sequentially detonated, distributed, some kind of energy.
I would assume.
Maybe it's heat energy.
Could be heat energy.
I don't know.
Mach 21 or less, as desired, up to 3,000 pounds.
The base is anywhere.
It's less than 200 pounds of projectile, $200 a pound for the projectile.
Excellent anywhere, no plume.
Affordability, ferocity, reaction time, survivability, recallability, effectiveness.
And it's being worked on at Aberdeen and NASA MSFC for lofting of fuel and nano sats.
So, you know, to send these basically to send things into space.
Congress Passes Law00:07:10
Okay?
So if you had this technology in space, which is very, you know, possible, probable, it's right here.
That is what you're looking at right there: a blast wave accelerator.
12-turn spiral gyrating on a three-mile radius at nine hertz.
So it's right there.
Look, slingation for global precision strike.
I mean, basically, this is a takedown weapon.
It has ultimate plausible deniability, right?
Take a look.
Excellent stealth, no plume.
You can base it anywhere.
So this stuff has been around for a very, very long time.
I mean, that's the diagram for it.
I'm not making Another pre-9-11 document.
So here's the deal.
We're going to take one more commercial break.
I'm going to come back briefly to YouTube and tell you where you can find that second hour.
Again, Hint Hint, it's RVMRumble.com.
We love the internet, but the internet is tracking everything you do.
Take control of your online privacy with IP Vanish.
People with malicious intent are everywhere watching you.
Criminals can hack your Wi-Fi while broadband providers and advertisers monitor your data.
With IP Vanish on your device, your internet activity is encrypted.
No one can see what you're doing.
Your location, your connection, completely hidden.
Protect your internet privacy today with IP Vanish.
All right, guys.
You know, Congress passed a law.
Oh, I forgot.
That's another video we're going to have to play on the other side.
We're going to have to play that on the other side.
That's right.
We're playing it on the other side.
Some more tuck-ins on the other side, not with RFK Jr., but the police chief of the January 6th event.
I think it's an important interview, and especially the point he makes out in the beginning and what was going on there.
We're going to get into transhumanism and a bunch of other stories.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
Remember, the uncensored second hour is at rvmrumble.com.
You can support the broadcast a number of the ways down below with the links.
But redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored is going to help support the broadcast and get you those two premiums earlier than everybody else, every single week.
All right, YouTube, that's going to about do it for me.
We will see you on the flip.
All right, we're off of YouTube.
So now let's actually go to that video.
And again, this is the Tuck-ins talking January 6th with the police chief and the police chief saying, yes, they denied us extra forces on purpose.
That's real.
Nancy Pelosi and Mitch McConnell really did that.
No kidding.
No kidding.
By federal law, you know, Congress passed a law that requires me to go to the Sergeant Arms Capitol Police Board in advance of an event and to request federal resources such as the National Guard.
So Congress passed a law.
It's two U.S. Code 1970.
Look it up.
Just make sure you look it up before December 22 when they changed it.
So what was in effect on the 6th, that requires me to go and get approval for bringing in National Guard or federal assistance in advance.
I have to go to the Capitol Police Board and get approval from congressional leadership in advance, like I did on January 3rd.
I'm denied twice because of optics and because the intelligence didn't support it.
So think about that.
Let me ask you the question, who made that decision?
Who denied you?
I was denied by Paul Irving, House Sergeant Arms, and also Mike Stinger, Senate Sergeant Arms.
And who do they work for?
On January 3rd?
Who do they work for?
It would have been working for Pelosi on the House side.
That Pelosi was the number one boss, and then McConnell on the Senate side.
Ah.
So effectively, Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi shut down your request.
My requests were shut down, one, because of optics, which is interesting.
You're going to hear that term come up a couple more times, optics over the look of the National Guard on the Hill.
But yeah, and the Capitol Police Board, I mean, it's unbelievable that I'm the only chief of police in the United States that has a law preventing me, not just regulations, rules that say I got to go and get approval to bring in the National Guard, a law.
So that's crazy that Congress is going to pass a law that controls what I can do to protect the Capitol and even in emergency.
So think of this.
Even while we're under attack, I have to go to those same two people to request the National Guard to be brought in.
I have 340 National Guard that have been activated.
At least 150 to 180 of those are in the city, many of them within eyesight of the Capitol.
Okay?
We got to come under attack at 1253.
12:55.
I called the Washington DC Police Department.
I talked to their assistant chief, Jeff Carroll.
Thank God I had talked to him at 10:59 in the morning and asked him if he could possibly put some additional resources on Constitution Avenue.
And he had some CDU platoons up there.
Called him, said, Hey, please send those in right away because we knew as soon as they came up to their west front, they started attacking, it was going to be bad.
12:58, I make my first call to the sergeant at arms asking, saying, Hey, it's bad.
We need assistance.
I need a declaration of emercy.
I need to bring in the military immediately and federal resources.
I'm told by Paul Irving, quote, I'm going to run it up the chain, I'll get back to you.
His chain would be up to Nancy Pelosi.
He didn't have to do that, but he wouldn't give me authorization.
The law says in emercy, he can grant me authorization, but he didn't.
He said he'd run up the chain.
My next call was over to Mike Stinger.
He's now the chairman of the Capitol Police Board.
Told him the same thing: We're getting our asses handed to us on the wet front.
I need federal resources.
He said, What did Paul tell you?
He said, He's running up the chain.
He says, Let's wait to hear what we hear from Paul.
Sorry.
So for the next 71 minutes, I make 32 calls.
I'm in the command center.
I'm calling my partner agencies.
And by law, you know, one of the first people offer assistance was the United States Secret Service.
And by law, I shouldn't have requested their assistance.
You know, I shouldn't be until I had approval.
But I'm looking at my men and women having their asses handed to them.
And my first thought was, fuck it, I will take whatever discipline there is.
Send me whatever you got.
No, that's the one tech secret service turned over.
You know how they lost all their texts?
Yes.
It's the text between their Chief Sullivan and myself.
Thank God for him.
I don't.
So you make this call immediately.
Immediately.
To the House Sergeant at Arms who reports, Mr. Irving, who reports to NC Pelosi, he says, I'll call Pelosi.
He says, I'm going to run it up the chain.
Run it up the chain, but that is the chain.
Now, here's the gosh.
I want to tell you exactly what you're doing.
So what happens then?
Does he get back to you?
So for the next 71 minutes, I make the 32 calls to a number of agencies.
11 of those calls are follow-up calls.
And look in the Senate combined report from 2001.
They have a great infographic of the call after call after call after call.
11 times I call in the next 71 minutes going, where are we on the approval?
Where are we in the approval?
Just any minute now, any minute.
I'm going to get any minute.
Finally, at 2.09, 71 minutes later, 2.09, I'm finally given approval.
Live Cell Encapsulation Potential00:10:32
Think about that.
71 minutes later, I immediately call Mike Stinger, say, we've got approval.
I was so pissed off, I made sure that the watch commander, I'm in the command center, I yelled to John Wish.
I'm the lieutenant, that's my watch commander.
I said, John, mark the time as 2:10.
I finally got approval from the National Guard.
I was that mad.
So what is the, I just want to pause on this for a minute.
That's like, it's almost unbelievable.
So this is an event that Pelosi herself has likened to Pearl Harbor at 9-11.
You know, the worst thing that's ever happened on American soil.
And she's in charge of allowing the National Guard to come in and respond, but she doesn't for 71 minutes.
What is that?
I'll tell you what it is.
It's a scam.
It's a setup.
It's a lie.
Okay.
So I want to hit some more of these stories before I start hitting some of the videos we got out there.
I was looking up bio nanotech, et cetera, yesterday to see if I could find any news stories.
And by the way, it's crazy now.
When I typed in, I think it was bioengineering.
Okay.
First of all, it didn't even give me a suggestion of the news when I did it.
Okay.
So in other words, if you do a Google search, why don't we do it live?
We'll do it right here.
Bioengineering.
Bioengineering.
Okay.
So this is what I mean.
You see this?
So see up here, normally there should be a news section.
They don't want you to know about bioengineering with Google.
Yeah, they're taking part in it.
They have a whole division, many divisions based in it.
And look what the first, oh, Berkeley, Stanford, University of California.
Okay, so now I come over here to all my filters.
See this news.
This is why we're going to go, what is bioengineering?
Is the first thing from McKinney?
None of this is relevant at all.
It's all market stuff.
And this is the one that I found.
I just couldn't.
This is the one promoted the most from yesterday, a six-step roadmap.
Again, nothing to do with actual bioengineering.
This is how dumbed down they've got it.
But a roadmap to diversify faculty hiring in biomedical engineering.
What?
You know how you diversify in that arena?
You hire the most qualified people and they have a diversification of ideas.
And it has nothing to do with their gender identity or their racial or ethnic identity at all.
It's zero to do with that.
But not anymore.
And this is what's promoted by Google when I go to the news section on bioengineering.
So just the topic of bioengineering now, post-COVID-1984 nightmare, is completely and totally suppressed to the average user purposely in their great narrative push.
That should scare the shizzle out of people.
Think about that for a moment.
You type in almost any topic of a political or scientific relevance.
You know, let's give it a chance right now.
Let's do it right now.
Okay.
So we'll go quantum computing.
Boom.
And you know what?
There it is right there.
Third one.
News.
Right there.
So two fields that are exploding.
You're allowed to type in quantum computing, and the news will be the third suggestion.
And by the way, quantum computing, artificial intelligence, bioengineering, nanotechnology, they all go hand in hand.
But so many people are now aware of the arena of bioengineering that is clearly dangerous and clearly weaponized against us that now Google has essentially censored information for the rest of us.
Isn't that nice?
Don't you love it?
It's great.
Live cell encapsulation, the bioengineering breakthrough, revolutionary therapeutics with controlled drug delivery.
So like I was able to find one article of interest from my Google search about quote-unquote therapeutics and tackling chronic diseases and research that's paving the way.
Right.
And then there's always the business angle and the competitive landscape.
So again, you look at this.
It's all about making money.
It's all about making money.
All right.
Live cell encapsulation, a cutting-edge bioengineering technology, entails encasing living cells with specialized materials or coatings.
This innovative approach utilizes very materials like liposomes, hydrogels, and microcapsules for encapsulation.
Remember, we were talking about hydrogels here during COVID-19 and liposomes, and everybody's like, don't pay attention to that.
Don't pay attention to that, Jack.
Take a look.
It's right here.
And you can barely find it.
And it's all promoted.
Live cell encapsulate, that's a buzz term for all sorts of bio-nanotech about to be unleashed on an unsuspecting, unknowing public that has been purposely left ignorant and in the dark on most of this.
Live cell encapsulation plays a pivotal role in cell therapies.
Oh, kind of like gene therapies that aren't gene therapies.
They're vaccines now, but no, it's cell therapies now.
Okay.
A pivotal role in cell therapies, enabling controlled release of bioactive materials or cells, thus bolstering the market growth amid a rising demand for cell therapies worldwide.
Its unique feature of avoiding immune system responses ensures encapsulated cells can carry out specific functions effectively, such as activating cancer drugs.
And there's going to be a lot of preventatives on top of this.
It's going to tackle all these autoimmune disorders.
These are going to be great.
In a groundbreaking research study in 2021, Nuvalex utilized encapsulated live cells to treat pancreatic cancer, successfully converting inactive cancer drugs into their cancer-killing form, delivering targeted and potent chemotherapic treatment directly to tumors.
So it's always going to just enhance the old treatments, right?
Their cancer kill converting the inactive cancer drugs into their cancer-killing form.
What does that even mean?
What does that even mean?
And it's going to be, again, technology that's real and will help empower those that can afford it and those in the upper echelons of the predator class and then kept away from the vast majority of us.
In fact, weaponized against the vast majority of us.
You understand that?
The prevalence of chronic diseases like cancer and diabetes has surged globally.
Remember, they told us it was going to be the opposite.
I always discuss this because it matters.
I told us it was totally the, we were going to cure all this stuff by now.
Duh.
Posing significant health challenges.
Live cell encapsulation holds immense promise in the treatment of chronic diseases, including type 1 diabetes, cancer, and autoimmune disorders.
The technology's application is delivering insulin-producing cells and dopamine delivery for Parkinson's disease has garnered attention, propelling the market forward with a number of chronic diseases cases on the rise.
Companies are incorporating and refining live cell encapsulation to meet the growing demand.
Gotta love it.
Got to love it.
Let's see, research and development paved the way.
Here's the key.
We're going to get into the 3D printing because I'm always talking about the fact that these things are now bio-nanotech that is printed in molecular printers.
The ever-expanding biotechnology sector, driven by extensive research and development and increased investments from key market players, contributes to the remarkable clinical efficacy and development of live cell encapsulation.
Notable partnerships and collaborators like BioNX and Nanoscribes HydroBioNX N400 offering 3D printing-enabled cell encapsulation, yay!
Underscore the potential of live cell encapsulation.
In July of 21, Pharma site BioTech embarked on a two-phase pig study to investigate live cell encapsulation technology for diabetes treatment, further fueling research opportunities.
You know, they're not going to tell you to get rid of the high-fructose corn syrup.
They're not going to tell you to supplement.
No, no, no, we got the diabetes drugs for you.
Humanization Through Technology00:02:44
That's what we got.
We got a thing to put on your arm going to regulate your blood sugar for you.
No personal responsibility whatsoever.
And soon we're going to have these drugs.
Yeah.
How about a big heaping, steaming pile of no thanks?
How about time and time again when you've told us that technology was going to empower us, especially in the medical arena, it seems to be making people sicker.
Doesn't seem to be helping, especially when the arena comes to that of psychology and depression and all these different types of drugs that you put people on that mess with their heads.
That mess with their heads.
No big deal.
But hey, that's what it's about.
Let's mess with some heads, right?
So here is Klaus Nutschwab talking to Sergey Brin, one of the guys behind Google, about the transhumanist future and the robot takeover and really just what it means to be human.
I think this is very not only interesting, it's a crucial issue.
We are looking at technology very often threatening our present thinking interpretation of how the world evolves.
And actually, we probably need new, you use the word meaning, we need new concepts to define what humanity is.
New concepts to define what humanity is, because this is directed evolution.
You don't get a say.
We're doing this.
Being human in the future, if these people get their way, has to be redefined.
Stay human, everybody.
And what's the purpose of our lives?
And we may go much more again into the direction of people who are afraid of robotization, but it may be humanization which robotization will allow.
Would you?
Oh.
Oh, the robotization, the automation is going to allow humanization later on.
They're going to be our masters.
And that idea of humanization is going to be redefined.
Thanks, Klaus Nutschwab.
You're the best.
This is a very optimistic, let's say, perception, which personally I share.
Robotization and Humanization00:04:06
But would you agree?
Oh, 100%.
Thank you,
Krista.
Sorry, I was muted.
I coughed.
My bad, everybody.
So the nutswab, yep.
Yep, I did mute myself.
I see it now in the comments.
So notice the agreement here.
Isn't that nice?
That's a, what is it, a positive look on humanity, of the future of humanity.
I don't think robots allowing a redefined humanity is a good thing.
And I think that the vast majority of this is what they call directed evolution.
And that's really the end of our freedom as a species.
Just want to throw that right out there.
So yeah, this I wanted to play because now they're talking about Roger Stone being part of the coup that Trump was going to launch.
The coup.
There was no coup.
These people were trying to audit.
Let me repeat that.
Audit and election.
Doesn't seem like it's going to work out for anybody.
And it looks like they're going to try to put Roger Stone back in prison.
I mean, it literally looks that way.
So here's Stone.
Although state officials in all 50 states must ultimately certify the results of the voting in their state,
the final decision as to who the state legislatures authorize the sent to the Electoral College is a decision made solely by the legislature.
Any legislative body may decide on the basis of overwhelming evidence of fraud to send electors to the Electoral College who accurately reflect the president's legitimate victory in their state,
which was illegally denied him through fraud.
So once again, like here you go.
Stone isn't saying anything off the cuff.
There's no coup here.
Okay?
Pushing elector plot.
Like it's unreal how they've inverted reality.
We must be prepared to lobby our Republican legislatures by personal contact and by demonstrating the overwhelming will of the people in their state, in each state, that this may need to happen.
And this is now what they're trying to spin as quote-unquote a coup or election interference or disenfranchising voters.
They're going to try to put him in jail for that.
You watch.
You watch.
That's what's next.
Okay.
Virtual Reality's Conscious Wave00:15:11
And look, at the same time, you know, we were talking, getting to a bit of transhumanism right before that, before I forgot that I had that.
But it's transhumanism all the way around.
And it doesn't matter what side of the aisle you're on.
There are people on both sides that really have this vision of a directed evolution future.
And Jared Kushner is one of those people.
But he believes that basically this technology is going to empower people like himself and allow them to live forever.
Well, I assure you, transhumanism is two different things.
That some of these people do biologically intend to live forever.
And the rest of us get a sort of a euthanasia.
We get a mind clone that isn't us and they that uploads into whatever the metaverse becomes.
But we'll get there in a moment.
Friend, and then finally, I think that from the last year, the one thing I've tried to put a priority on since I left the White House was getting some exercise in.
I think that there's a good probability that my generation is, hopefully with the advances in science, either the first generation to live forever or the last generation that's going to die.
And so we need to keep ourselves in pretty good shape, friend.
Oh, yeah.
Just, you know, but again, you know, we could pretend like these people don't believe it.
Now, I want people to check this out.
I haven't played this enough.
The first part of this, we're going to skip around is this green steel thing.
But this is where we want to be.
See, this is green.
Everything's green and climate goals and SDG and decarbonized.
We got to decarbonize.
Decarbonize.
But we're the carbon they want to get rid of.
Okay.
So now what I want you to see here is this VR device lets you feel the metaverse with your bare hands.
See, this is how it's really going to work.
Okay.
So it's not going to be even a suit or haptic feedback.
The haptic feedback is going to come to you.
Now, this is already the commercially available device.
Okay.
I want people to really understand that you can already use this if you have the cash.
Maybe I should buy one of these.
See how creepy it really is.
But imagine this thing when you go into a room.
These are just everywhere.
You understand that idea?
And now you're in a room that's going to feel like you could be anywhere, whether it be wind or touch or possibly heat or cold.
I mean, this could probably do it all, mimic it all.
So let's just get out of my way because it's an ultrasonic force field.
It sends an ultrasonic force field up into the air.
Yeah.
Creating the sensation of physical touch on your skin and lets you play and interact without gloves or controls and feel the effects of high fives and fist bumps.
Emerges wave one is part of a new VR sector called haptics.
Let's see if we can purchase a wave one right now.
I'll come back to that in a second.
Wave one haptics.
Okay, there that is.
Can we buy it?
I want to shop for it.
Wave one haptics.
No, I don't want the glove.
Four grand.
Those are 300.
Where's the haptics?
Let's see.
Wave ultra low frequency pulse generator, and it can't be seven bucks.
Looks a lot like our blast wave accelerator here.
So let's go back here.
Emerge.
Is this in the top?
That's just, no, that's the new Atlas.
Let's see, Emerge Wave One price.
500 bucks.
And it has a companion VR headset and mobile app via Kickstarter campaign.
Let's see.
That's in 2022.
When is it launching?
Or has it launched?
Can I get one?
Can I buy one?
Can I get one here?
Can we do it for the kids?
So, M13, Vulcan Capital, or the existing investors.
Huh.
I guess I'm going to have to look up more of that on my own.
But let's go back to what it can do.
So an ad just touched that VR experience, right?
And you can feel the mini-air force field wherever your arms can reach.
Emerge will initially support the MetaQuest 2 platform, which I own, and hopes the Metaverse delivers a better and more engaging ways to connect with others.
So there it is.
VR is increasing because they're pushing it.
And they're training workers with VR.
Every kind of simulation is happening with VO.
And this is a World Economic Forum technology pioneer.
Emerge.
Bumpity bump bump bum.
So I want to talk Kurzweil for a second, okay?
And eventually we'll get to the point where I play Kurzweil and he actually tells you the truth about overpopulation.
But then I think he falsely commits to the idea that somehow, some way, technology is going to empower humans to the point that we can live anywhere and energy is going to be almost free and it's going to be a very open society.
Meanwhile, the people that own his companies push everything like every other Johnny nonsense out there.
So let's start with the idea of a mind file and then get into mind clones or consciousness itself.
So this is Kurzweil back in 99 on his Age of Spiritual Machines tour talking about the mind file copies that he plans to create.
So we're not going to throw our mind file away just because the hardware crashes or as we go to the next very personal computer to embody our bodies and our brains.
We'll copy them and we'll retain that information.
There's a little fly in the ointment from my perspective, which is just because there's this entity that thinks it's Ray Kerzwell, because he has that memory, that snapshot of all the memories and knowledge that I've accumulated over the last several decades that have been on this planet.
I'm still, the old Ray Kerzwell, which is me, is still here in my carbon cell-based brain.
Carbon cell-based brain.
Now, that's the other thing.
These people are constantly talking about decarbonization, directed evolution.
Not just a transhumanist future, but some are talking about a post-human future.
Hence the fact that you've got Bryn and Schwab saying, you know, what's the definition?
We got to change that definition of being human.
And eventually, it's the automation, it's the robotization that's going to allow humanity to exist.
Awesome.
And so, my consciousness hasn't really been transferred over to this new entity.
In fact, you could have scanned my brain while I was sleeping and go and create this copy.
I wouldn't even necessarily know about it.
So, I'll just probably end up jealous of this guy because he'll share my ambitions and dreams, but he'll be in a much better position than I am to fulfill them.
He'll be in a much better position.
He, no, it.
It, if it ever exists, Ray.
And here he admits, you know, just kind of like what he just alluded to: this person or thing is not really me, that these things will not necessarily actually be conscious, but that's almost a moot point.
They are the most subtle, complex, deep, and rich phenomena that goes on in the human brain.
These new entities will evidence that same kind of rich behavior.
We will meet machines in the next century.
And what I mean by machines is a non-biological entity, an entity that's not the carbon cell-based entity that's not based on DNA-guided protein synthesis, but that is nonetheless based on the principles of the methods of the human brain.
And they will claim to be conscious.
They'll claim to have emotional experiences.
They'll claim to have spiritual experiences, hence the title of my book.
And unlike entities today, because you can meet virtual personalities in your kids' computer games, these 21st-century entities will be very compelling.
They'll be very convincing when they evidence these things.
And in fact, they'll be very intelligent.
So they will succeed in convincing us that they are conscious, that they have emotional experiences, and that they have spiritual experiences.
They will succeed.
And we'll settle it the way we always settle these issues, which is politically.
And most people will be convinced because these entities are going to be very convincing.
They'll get mad if we don't agree with them.
They'll get mad.
Uh-oh, a little smirkle.
The entities we create that are going to claim to be conscious and having spiritual experiences are going to get angry if we do not accept their consciousness.
So we will come to believe that they are conscious.
But that's a little bit different than the philosophical statement that they are conscious.
I mean, a lot of people in write-ups on my book have said, well, Ray Crisel's predicting conscious machines.
Our prediction is a little bit different.
We're going to have machines that claim to be conscious, and they're going to be very convincing, and we're going to believe them.
That's a little bit different than absolutely saying that they are conscious.
It's a lot of different.
It's a lot of different.
I am sorry, guys.
I'm coughing a lot today.
I don't know what's going on.
I feel okay.
I doubt I'm getting sad.
There's no reason to get sick.
I'm getting nice sunshine, walks, feeling good, feeling good out there, despite the Johnny nonsense that I've got to constantly cover.
So, you know, I often talk about the fact that transgenderism is, you know, a step into transhumanism.
It is to get you to disassociate yourself from your physical, biological reality.
It is also set out to eviscerate the norms of the traditional nuclear family, brothers, sisters, mother, father, extended family, you name it, all that stuff.
Yeah, it is also there to sterilize you so that you cannot reproduce.
They don't want you reproducing.
That's all part of transhumanism.
So they get you to accept the idea of biologically created entities.
Again, the work of Martin Rothblatt, from transgender to transhuman, unzipped genes, taking control of baby making and the new millennia, all that stuff is the road to this.
And at the end of the day, even Kurzweil, who is a big promoter of and really, again, a mentor to Martine Rothblatt, writes the forward in Rothblatt's book, of course, has what?
A female persona, Ramona, that where he embraces it in the virtual world and embraces this idea of a spectrum of genders and emotions and female sides inside the masculine.
Now, I'm not here to tell you that human beings don't have a varying degree of emotions and sides to them, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
What I am here to tell you is that biology is in fact biology, and this is set out to what?
Confuse individuals and promote the agenda I just discussed.
So here's Kurzweil showing you his avatar for the virtual world, Ramona.
Who is Ramona?
Well, this is a project that started a number of years ago.
She's a female, she's my female alter ego, and we'll have virtual bodies in these virtual reality environments, particularly when it's through the nervous system.
When we have nanobots in our brains that can shut down the signals coming from our real senses, replace them with the signals that your brain would be receiving if you were in the virtual environment, then it'll feel like you're in that virtual environment.
Your body doesn't have to be the same body that you have in real reality.
A couple could become each other, for example.
So I wanted to demonstrate how you could do that.
Well, in virtual reality, you can be who you want to be, and you can be where you want to be and with whom you want to be.
In virtual reality, you can be someone else.
And, you know, Kurzweil's got a wife, kids, right?
We went over his ridiculous children's book about Danielle, another transhumanist book, where Danielle, all of a sudden, as a teenager, becomes the president of the CCP in China.
And the president of the United States, apparently.
I mean, look at these fantasies this guy's pushing.
And this is a weird fantasy to be pushing.
I'm sorry.
On a beach with like a cut-down top telling you about all the dudes he's dated.
You don't have to be the same boring person all the time.
I mean, you all have these personalities inside you that don't quite fit with your bodies in real reality.
So basically, most people just like kill them all off.
Some people don't actually keep any of their personalities, which reminds me of some of my old boyfriends, but that's another story.
Reminds me of some of my own boyfriends killing off all your other personalities.
Isn't it?
Wasn't it like, again, this guy's supposed to be really smart.
Programmed Realities00:16:00
Wasn't it really like accepted science when people had some type of schizophrenia and multiple personality disorder that you kind of wanted to get that under control?
In fact, isn't that even like an allegory for the Hulk comic book, right?
Like you had the Bruce Banner, and then you had like the raging side.
And then later on, you know, he combined and there were all these, there's a real, I remember, I think it was like the Hulk 300, still one of my favorite story arcs for the Hulk and Dale Keown just doing awesome pencils.
And it breaks down into this whole like psychology thing of multiple personalities and the merging.
You know, there's an era of the quote-unquote gray hulk.
It was always kind of specifically diagnosed as a disorder that you needed to overcome.
Apparently, not anymore.
Now it needs to be what?
Embraced.
Why does it need to be embraced?
Because they want you to buy into fantasy land.
They want you to bend the knee to whatever great narrative they put out there.
And if you think that's bullshit, Meta, a company we've been talking about, and by the way, I'm going to show you Virtual Mars and Gateway, all this other stuff coming up in a moment, because that's all virtual reality too.
Meta trained on AI on 48 million science papers.
It was shut down after two days.
Galactica was supposed to help organize science.
Instead, it spewed misinformation.
Now, when they look at these large language models and they're actually utilizing their skills, they realize, wow, a lot of the stuff in these papers is either wrong or a lie or has been challenged, etc.
And remember, the AI that they've programmed, they've programmed with agendas so it can hallucinate or make things up.
That's a built-in feature.
That's not a bug.
You understand?
Because if the AI starts to benefit the masses in humanity, guess what?
The masses can challenge the predator class at the top.
Instead, they want to keep true AI completely away from us.
And only managed artificial intelligence that's continually trained, what?
To combat any type of speech or thought that challenges whatever agenda they're putting forward at the moment.
And that includes lying to you, by the way.
So here's Kurzweil essentially telling you the truth about overpopulation, but then kind of promoting the myth that everybody's benevolent and somehow we're going to build a society in which everybody is going to be able to access a multitude of free energy and just like print things up virtually in the real world.
Things that are virtual will become real through these bio nano printers.
But it's kind of a strange world where we can do things that have to do with information, but otherwise the world is still the old world of scarcity.
All of that's going to change as we go through the 2020s.
And here I have an example of energy.
So we're applying supercomputing to coming up with new materials, both for energy storage and collection of solar energy.
As a result, the costs both of producing solar energy and storing it are coming down quite dramatically.
As a result, we see exponential growth in the usage of solar and other renewables.
It's doubling every two years.
Total renewables is now about 6% at two years each.
Before 2030, we'll be able to provide all of our energy needs, ultimately at very low cost, using completely renewable energy.
Now, that may be a reality.
They, when I say they, I'm talking about strongmen, authoritarians, governments, banksters, gangsters, you name it, whatever you want to call it.
They're never going to allow that for the masses.
Never.
I presented this recently to the Prime Minister of Israel, who actually was in my class at the Sloan School in the 1970s.
And he said, Ray, do we have enough sunlight to do this with to double what at that time was seven more times?
And I said, yes, when we double seven more times and are meeting 100% of our energy needs from solar, we'll be using one part in 10,000 of the sunlight that falls on the Earth.
So this is another example how we will use the economics and the profound deflation rate of information technology that's now attending nominally information products to nominally physical products like energy and food and clothing and housing.
Finally, then she said, okay, there's one resource that's not an information technology, which you can't grow this way.
So you notice what he just said.
You know, again, 3D printed houses, they've been around for a very long time at this point, well over a decade and gotten better.
Now, how has that technology been utilized for the little guy?
So far it hasn't.
The clothes thing.
You know, I don't like the printed food idea.
And that's the other problem with guys like Kurzweil, is they sell you on, in my opinion, things that are never going to be good for human beings.
But he's also in a world where he's pushing really the end of humanity, whether he says it out loud or not.
That is what directed evolution of all species will be.
Which is land.
We're very crowded together.
That's not going to grow exponentially.
And I said, actually, we're not crowded together.
Try taking a train trip anywhere in the world, and you'll see 95% of the usable land is not used.
So we've decided artificially to crowd ourselves together.
Cities was a very early invention so that we could work and play together.
Ultimately, we'll be able to overcome that by spreading out.
We're already doing that.
My work group with Google is all over the world.
We're able to work together.
It's not exactly as good yet as being together, but ultimately, when virtual reality and augmented reality becomes highly realistic, which it will by the end of the 2020s, we'll be able to work and play together just like we're physically together, and we'll be able to live anywhere we want and use all of that 95% of the usable land that's currently not used.
I mean, we're not talking way off in the future, the late 2020s, five, six years.
That's a blink of an eye, guys.
Think about that.
Think about how quick that's, you know, I guess, you know, I'll finally be in my 50s once I make it there.
But at the same time, you know, this is what they're promoting.
But so much of it is a facade, is a virtual reality.
You know, we have to maintain that.
What does it mean by a virtual reality?
That means they're feeding us false Johnny nonsense.
And when we talk about meta in particular, you know, and virtual reality, I've got to play this because this is NASA talking about Mars, okay, and basically virtual spaces that will be created.
You see?
They're going to practice.
Everybody's going to practice living on Earth.
Living in 3D printed modules.
See that same technology that we're talking about?
It's going to simulate the conditions of life on Mars.
Sure, it is.
You know, you wonder what they're going to build virtually and show you.
But this idea of traveling to Mars is ridiculous.
It's, you know, they're going to limit resources, communication delays.
They're going to perform spacewalks.
They're going to carry out scientific research.
It's going to be physically undemanding.
It's not possible right now with the technology, at least, that you're showing us.
You're creating virtual Johnny nonsense with a master's discrete in a STEM subject.
This is it right here.
They'll research and help us prepare for the way for humans to pave the way for a human mission to Mars.
Take a look.
That's what it's going to look like, guys.
We're all being pre-programmed in the 2030s.
Get out of here.
They're about to sell us on some bullshit Artemis moon mission, too.
Gross.
Gross.
Gross indeed.
Let's go to the Project Gateway.
Okay.
So, here, again, this is like a fun part for NASA.
Again, selling you on the deep space travel.
That's all part of this UFO agenda.
Like, how Disney-esque is this?
It's like a crime crime in one of the movies.
I often wonder, you know, the rigors that astronauts or other people that get involved in these programs of the testing and experimentation that actually goes on with them.
And some of that experimentation may absolutely 100% be a thing called mind control.
And I know a lot of people don't want to hear that, that it could possibly be mind control.
But I think that's a big aspect of this.
I know people are calling a lot of these guys actor nauts and this and that.
I have no idea.
I think a lot of these are highly skilled, trained people.
Obviously, a lot of them do come out of flying aircraft that's often experimental that you never even hear about, but have a storied career as a pilot before that.
Lord knows what they've done to these people, just like Lord knows what goes on in Hollyweird.
But at the end of the day, both of them are very similar is that they are projecting a false image.
It's a mirage.
It's an illusion.
You know, it's not reality.
It's the reality that, once again, they want to project on you.
That's it.
You get it?
I hope you do.
I don't know.
Throwing it out there.
Oh, I've been doing this lately, but I think it's important.
I'm going to spend just a few more minutes on my documentary films, especially Fabled Enemies, because we played a little clip of it.
But Fabled Enemies is really the film that I suggest to most people that I believe to be ignorant about 9-11 first.
You know, there are still people out there that haven't seen Loose Change, and that's fine.
I still love Loose Change, and I want people to see Loose Change Final Cut and share it with other people.
But I think there is a certain effectiveness to Fabled Enemies because it is at a little bit of a slower pace.
It doesn't really touch on any kind of physical anomalies till towards the very end when you see that Building 7 section.
And the Building 7 section is unique in that, you know, at least at the time exclusively, it was the only one with the Barry Jennings footage because we're the ones that went and got that, which adds just a whole nother layer to it.
But it does a great job, in my opinion, of showing you how there is an international intelligence network out there that does run off of and feed off one another in this plausible deniability circle that is outside of nation states.
And really, again, once again, was exposed during Iran-Contra.
You know, that gun running blueprint, where, again, plausible deniability was there.
You had, I believe it was the Ukraine and Czechoslovakia selling the guns to Israel, who would then transport them down into the South American region with the Contras.
And then it would be U.S. assets that would fly the drugs up in as a payment system.
And then obviously those drugs had to be sold so that you could make a profit.
And obviously, you would have to pay back the Israelis for the guns themselves.
So you have a bit of that actually also in Invisible Empire, a New World Order defined, which, you know, that movie is there for those that hear the term NWO or New World Order and they think it's goofy because I thought it was goofy.
But if you start at Fabled Enemies and you see people like Joe Biden telling Luke Radowski to get a life when he's asked about why he was meeting with one of the money men behind 9-11 and the hijackers and Ottawa specifically, people's eyebrows get raised, Democrat or Republican.
It's not like, you know, the vast majority of the Democrats want Joey B in there.
They don't want Zombie J in there, but they just got severe TDS or they've been playing team baseball that long.
Team baseball, no bueno.
Team baseball, no bueno when it becomes a thing that makes you suppress reality and no longer adhere to a truth that is right in front of your face.
Team Baseball, No Bueno00:01:18
In fact, not only oppress reality and ignore that truth, but then try to suppress and oppress others based on that ideology.
Things get dangerous.
Things get dangerous.
So Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, and New World Order defined, I think they go hand in hand.
Of course, Loose Change Final Cut with the anniversary of 9-11 now just around the corner is another one of these extremely important films that I'm very proud to be a part of and really is what started it all for me, got me going.
And that's why 9-11, you know, whether it got me going or not in this career, it is important because it really accelerated so many aspects of this global police state and what has come home here to roost.
Period.
And that's another reason we highlighted RFK Jr. and the anthrax attacks, which we highlighted in Fabled Enemies.
Folks, stick around over at RVM.
Remember, later today, you've got Chad Caton, Wayne Dupree, you got Ray Dietrich, Drew Berquist, and others.