Info Warrior - Jason Bermas - Kurzweil Predicts Immortality In Under A Decade?

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 8, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas

01:54:57

Kurzweil Predicts Immortality In Under A Decade?

NA
[Read More]

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
Machinery That Gives Abundance 00:03:33
	We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
	Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
	We think too much and feel too little.
	More than machinery.
	We need humanity.
	We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat.
	As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
	We know things are bad, worse than bad.
	They're crazy.
	I am the great and powerful.
	You've got to say, I'm a human being.
	God damn it.
	My life has been.
	You have met all the primal forces of nature.
	Don't give yourselves to brutes.
	Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, tired you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
	Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
	Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
	The elevator with Jason Burmese.
	And who loves you?
	And who do you love?
	Good morning, good morning, good morning, everybody.
	And first things first, a little housekeeping.
	I'm already seeing people in the comments section saying, hey, we're going to get a full hour today.
	I have no clue.
	I'm not in control of the software.
	I will say this.
	I spent a lot of time on my computer cleaning up a bunch of files, doing some reinstalls.
	I did not reinstall the entire operating system.
	So who knows?
	And if it's a hardware issue, who knows?
	We're going to try.
	But I will say this.
	If you are upset about yesterday and you didn't get enough Burmese, the full two hours is over at Rumble's RVM page.
	Or I'm sorry, RVM's Rumble page.
	I sound great already.
	Of course, there won't be any disasters on the show.
	I'm getting everything 100% correct.
	So yes, if you want to watch yesterday's show, don't worry.
	I am going to post it probably on my Rumble, etc.
	But I've been behind on posting.
	You know, I've been trying to get with this red pill thing over the weekend.
	Not the term.
	I've told you I don't like the term, but I do like G. Edward Griffin and his events, and that's going to be in Des Moines on Saturday and Sunday.
	So very fun stuff.
	Should have a pretty great guest for you on Monday.
	We're going to keep that under wraps for now.
	But getting into today's subject matter, you know, often I'll be sitting there and I'll be scrolling through the news cycle and it's just the same old kind of like daytime soap opera drama.
	Now I get a lot of great news.
	There are a lot of bad takes out there and media spin.
	And we do keep up on current events when we're talking about election cycles and impeachments and policy, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Bizarre Predictions And Views 00:10:57
	But one of the things that I think this show does that is unique is that sometimes that's just not enough, right?
	So I think to myself, well, what do you want to talk about tomorrow, Jason?
	And, you know, it's later in the evening.
	I'm thinking to myself, well, how about, you know, I accidentally pulled up calico the other day.
	And for those that don't know what Calico is, Calico is Google's immortality division.
	And it is headed by the guy that has predicted immortality within the next seven to 10 years.
	Now, that's a big prediction.
	It is one that would be completely disruptive of all of society.
	Obviously, if that technology were available and the literal fountain of youth were discovered, something man has been searching for and dreaming about since the beginning of time, really, of written history, fountain of youth, right?
	Tree of life, all those things.
	It is such a societal disruptor because, first of all, who is going to get that technology?
	Say that technology does come.
	I mean, are we going to live that Elysium lifestyle where the people are up in the clouds?
	And what is he considering actual immortality?
	Is it the trick immortality?
	Is it the lie immortality?
	I suspect it is.
	I suspect we're not talking about biological life, but the idea of mind clones and digital doppelgangers and you being embedded in a metaverse, not of your choosing, and bio-nanobots and all sorts of crazy stuff.
	So I was looking, again, for Calico.
	This is what I came upon.
	Shocking human immortality in seven years.
	Kurzweil's astonishing 2030 prediction.
	Now, it embeds this, and it must have gotten some play because this video, which is part two, like an eight-part series on Kurzweil, has clearly the most views in this thing.
	And, you know, I've got part one and two queued up to kind of do a watch along with, but it's pretty damn cookie cutter.
	Okay.
	And, you know, I'm not saying it's bad or what, but obviously this person's still doing it as, you know, they've updated the page just seven days ago.
	You look at the views on the other ones.
	Some of them have less than a thousand views, and where one and two have 59 and 127.
	Meaning there was some traction on the embed.
	You know, I didn't go check out all the analytics, but I said kind of a kind of subpar, but at least there is a word of caution.
	Okay.
	Well, let me say this.
	Every time that I start digging a little deeper, things change.
	Now, we're definitely going to do that.
	And before that, I have this weird interview that I also found from the past year where Kurzweil's being, at first, when I saw the video on the side, you know, for me searching, I thought it was like a thumbnail for epic rap battles of epic rap battles of hero, which is good stuff.
	And I believe they've done Ray Kurzweil before.
	I thought this because I was looking at the person who was interviewing Kurzweil, and he was like trying to be a mirror image of Kurzweil 30 years ago.
	It was very bizarre.
	The whole thing's very bizarre.
	But they talk about large language models.
	And right in the offset, Kurzweil talks about sentience and how it's not a scientific issue.
	It's a philosophical one.
	That's a lie.
	See, they want you to trust in science, believe the science all the time, when it fits their narrative.
	But they know scientifically that these things that they're creating, okay, are not sentient and they are programmed and they are part of an agenda, and they massage the language all over the place.
	Meanwhile, they promise you that you're going to get all the good stuff.
	You're getting the gravy train with biscuit wheels, don't you know?
	It's like you get a new car and you get a new car and you get a new arm.
	So that brings me to where I found that I did not know existed.
	Okay, so some really interesting things about Kurzweil, right?
	Let me let me start it there.
	So, believe it or not, the way that I found this is the Academy Achievement on Ray Kurzweil is I was looking for images of him in the 1990s when his hairline was much like it is today, but maybe a little bit even worse.
	And because Kurzweil, you know, for all his anti-aging and we're going to all live forever, he can't help but look ridiculous in either a wig or plugs or die job.
	I mean, whatever he's got going is just over the top.
	I'm not saying don't do your own thing, but it's like it's funny that the guy that's telling us about immortality and the singularity for years and years and years and is a brilliant guy, which we're about to go over.
	Okay, brilliant guy.
	He can't even keep himself from looking like an old, ridiculous man trying to hang on to his youth.
	You know, I've had a couple of my buddies, you know, see my hair and go, when are you going to die it?
	I'm like, never.
	I always told people that I was proudly going to go full clooney.
	And I will go full clooney.
	I'm already there, really.
	I mean, we're down the road.
	We're like at dusk till dawn cluny at this point.
	You know, I'm going gracefully.
	And if I lose it, oh well.
	You know, I'm not trying to hang on to something that's not there.
	I just want to say that.
	So here, again, brilliant guy.
	Really, really smart guy.
	Born in 48.
	What's that make him?
	52, 7, about 75 years old.
	And he looks good for 75, but he's still an old man.
	And he's really trying to hang on to this because he believes it.
	Okay?
	But don't worry, we're going to get to the punchline at the bottom.
	Remember, this is the guy in 1999 talked about the age of spiritual machines.
	And now we're also talking about, again, entities that we create that he predicted in that book may or may not be conscious, right?
	But don't necessarily have to be, but because they will be so convincing that we will grant them consciousness.
	And this is this gets into the legalese that's predicted by one of the acolytes of Ray Kurzweil, who we'll get into in a moment.
	I mean, things get weird, everybody.
	We're in weird, weird town.
	You understand?
	So when we get right down to the bottom, okay, Rob Robots and Beyond, we get to this Danielle Chronicles of a Superheroine.
	Okay, has the companion book, How You Can Be a Danielle.
	A novel, a Vision, a Parallel History, a Roadmap.
	Okay.
	And it's be kind, be smart, right?
	I love physics.
	All believe the leap to liberty.
	And it's written by Ray Kurzweil.
	Got a little quote there from Stevie Wonder.
	Yes, the Stevie Wonder, because Kurzweil interviewed the, not interviewed, but he created the Kurzweil keyboard, among very other things.
	Now, Amy Kurzweil is his daughter.
	He's got a wife who is, I believe, a Harvard psychologist.
	He's got, I believe, two daughters.
	And the daughter illustrated this.
	Okay.
	Now you can tell that this is a total indoctrination tool for your kids.
	100%.
	In fact, it's got its own website.
	As soon as I found out about the book, I'm like, whoa, whoa.
	Talk about the indoctrination of children.
	It's right here.
	And it's on advertisement.
	Ray to change the world.
	Futurist inventor and author Ray Kurzweil written his first novels to inspire you in Danielle, Chronicles of a Superheroine.
	A pressure, no, I'm sorry, a precocious girl uses her intelligence and accelerating technologies to solve the world's biggest challenges.
	Danielle's Journey casts a hopeful vision of humanity's future.
	And two free companion books show you how you can achieve it.
	Remember when they were telling kids they're going to be literal superheroes on TV just over the past couple years if they huh?
	Superheroes.
	And now you're going to be a superheroine if you give up your humanity and you accept, not only accept, but embrace transhumanism.
	This is what they're teaching your children.
	It's going to get better.
	Don't worry, we're going to, I'm not going to make you hang till the break to get to the big spot, but come on.
	Take a look at this.
	And they love it.
	The singularity is near, and the age of spiritual machines is a cultural touchstone.
	I mean, in a lot of ways, it is.
	But in so many ways, people aren't aware of that and why it's important.
	Okay?
	So you get right down here and we're going to play these videos.
	That's going to be on the flip side.
	You don't think there's indoctrination?
	You better believe it.
	See more videos, by the way.
	Got a YouTube page.
	Oh, Martin Rothblatt.
	Martin Rothblatt's there.
	No, really?
	I can't believe it.
	How about that?
	Martin Rothblatt.
	Danielle is an inspiring page turner that engages the hearts and minds of young adults as well as free-thinking adults of all ages.
	It is as intellectually uplifting as Ray Kurzweil's other great books.
Infinite Possibilities 00:02:51
	But his trenchant lessons on techno-immortality and techno-abundance are now distilled into a storyline that has the makings of a classic fable.
	I'm going to read the rest of it in a second.
	But again, they promise you, the surf, the person that they don't even really look at you as human, the predator class at top.
	The ones that are in control of these scientific systems and black programs and technology and commercialization.
	They don't care about you, but they're selling your kids to embrace all this stuff.
	They're going to live forever and be superheroes.
	We're going to be back after this message from our sponsor.
	When I invented My Pillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you.
	And 20 years later, all of your supporters, what keeps us going.
	Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
	To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition My Pillow.
	The Giza Elegance My Pillow is made with my patented adjustable film, the most amazing cotton and a two-inch pipe cusset.
	It has four custom mop levels, machine-washable and dryable, and you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
	Go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
	Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary My Pillow Queen Size.
	Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
	That's right, get a queen size My Pillow for only $19.98.
	From all of us here at MyPillow, no, thank you, Mike.
	So, Martine Rothblatt, for those that do not know, or maybe new to the broadcast, or you're a first-timer, is the most powerful transgender human on the planet, as far as I know.
	And a prolific author of such books, like I have next to me, of Unzipped Genes, Baby Making in the New Millennium, and this book right here.
	Okay, let me just get out of the way because I want you to read the title.
	From Transgender to Transhuman, a manifesto on the freedom of form.
	And it advocates that there are actually billions, you know, a continuum of sexual types, countless variations in between.
	So we're talking about infinite.
	It doesn't end anytime ever.
	This startling new notion is just now beginning to emerge from feminist thinking, scientific research, and a grassroots movement called transgenderism.
Infinite Variations 00:11:31
	This is a book from 2012.
	It lays out the agenda.
	It tells you right there that what?
	In the future, labeling people at birth as male or female would be considered just as unfair as South Africa's now abolished practice of stamping black or white on people's ID cards, directly putting it into the realm of quote-unquote apartheid.
	I mean, your baby.
	And it constantly talks about your baby's genitals.
	And now you're like, that's like a the doctor sees a small you know what's key and it's a boy.
	I mean, I want to throw up because it's such obvious and innate propaganda.
	And now Martine Rothblatt wants your kids to read Kurzweil's book on superheroes and immortality.
	And wait till you see who Danielle becomes the president of.
	I mean, Danielle's pretty impressive when you see how small these kids are and how much they like Danielle.
	Whoa, Danielle's the best.
	Skibbiny, bobbin and boobity bibbity.
	Amy Kurzweil's evocative artwork are like meditation focal points that recapitulate the plot with iconic images.
	Danielle is a literary work exemplar of Einstein's adage that things should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.
	The Kurzweils have made the techno-progressive thesis accessible to all.
	I know for sure countless lives will be saved as a result.
	Countless lives will be saved as a result.
	Again, all this promise, this is all for us.
	And I want people really deep down to think about these promises right now.
	Think about it for a second.
	Tell me why the average lifespan in this country has gone down, not up in my generation.
	Used to be around 77, 72.
	Tell me why.
	Tell me why the amount of chronic disease is shot through the roof.
	None of this is on purpose.
	Yeah, there are some things that are obviously, you know, environmental and life choices.
	But there are so many other things that are also life choices, but they don't seem like them.
	Right?
	Like, you're making your life choices with what you're putting into your body.
	You're drinking water, you're drinking Mountain Dew, you're drinking coffee, you're drinking whiskey.
	What are you doing?
	What are you eating?
	Big time.
	Quality air, how much sunlight you're getting.
	Those type of life choices.
	But then there's the other ones out there that may or may not be mandated or may not have happened when you were basically an infant and they were choices that were left up to your parents that I believe have really, you know, I just did a big interview with Barbara Lofisher.
	And, you know, there's so much stuff that I'd love to discuss right now.
	Can't discuss it in the first hour.
	But you just see what's happened.
	They've promised us the world.
	And they say we have the, you know, best medical system in the world here.
	And yeah, that's true.
	If you're rich, if you've got a whole lot of the cheese, baby, yeah, you can afford really great health care.
	If you don't, we'll see what we got for you.
	And I mean, you better be rich, rich.
	Because let's be honest, you know, if it's only just a couple million, you might just get sucked down.
	A couple million.
	You're a gravy train for a little while.
	But I mean, when you got like, when you're like a Buffett, when you're like a Gates, yeah, you have access to the most primo medical care.
	And that's the point.
	That's the division that's already here.
	They've told us how many times they're going to cure cancer.
	Joe Biden like mumbled the other day that he thought he did cure cancer at this point with his cancer moonshot program.
	Joe Biden did it.
	The 81 million vote man.
	All right.
	Off on a tangent.
	On a tangent.
	I just, it just, countless lives will be saved as a result of this book.
	Danielle, the superheroine.
	Countless lives.
	These are masterpieces.
	I'm confident these books will change the world.
	Save the world.
	Kids will read them and do amazing, progressive things no one thought possible.
	But by modeling on Danielle and absorbing the succulent, or no, I'm sorry.
	Yes, no, it is.
	Absorbing the succulent yet succinct knowledge from a chronicle of ideas, they will be emboldened to do what they then know they cannot do.
	Okay.
	Okay, Martin.
	Noah, thank you.
	Noah, thank you.
	So let's just let's, I don't want to start with the adults.
	Let's start with these kids.
	We'll go kid, adult, kid.
	That's what we'll do.
	I mean, get ready for the, you're just going to love this.
	Everybody should love this.
	is good stuff.
	Daniel is the perfect human being.
	I think she's this like fearless, no negative energy at all.
	I mean, you notice how the term fearless has been just thrown around with the youth lately?
	They are fearless.
	They are fierce.
	Are they?
	Are you kidding me?
	I mean, no offense, but generally, when I see somebody that's under 30, they're pretty soft.
	They're pretty soft politically.
	They're pretty soft mentally.
	And not everybody.
	You know, there are some people that are driven there, but I'm not seeing a lot of alpha dogs out there, bro.
	She's fearless.
	Oh, but we're not talking about alpha dogs.
	We're making, you know, a little girl.
	And by the way, Martine Rothblatt specifically says in the Transformers conference that they want to target the youth and little girls especially.
	Just want to throw that out there.
	Danielle, superheroine.
	Always positive, strong, and headstrong.
	She's a very hardworking person.
	This is not your average little girl.
	She's badass.
	She really is.
	She did so much at such a young age.
	She cured cancer.
	She becomes the president of China and the president of the United States.
	I wish I could do that.
	Even if she just helps a little portion, that's not enough.
	She wants to help more.
	So again, think about the messages that they're putting out to these kids.
	Let's start out.
	I mean, she's badass.
	She cured cancer.
	I mean, again, you're going to live forever.
	Right?
	Singularity's coming in the next seven years.
	You're going to live forever.
	No.
	They're telling you.
	They are telling you.
	It's going to be a digital doppelganger.
	But first, before that even happens, you're going to have to give up your entire...
	Forget about TrackTrace database on the outside.
	You're going to have to absorb into smart contracts and blockchains and nano sensors and bio nanote.
	That's it.
	That's the reality that they're pushing.
	And then what are they pushing?
	What?
	Oh, yeah.
	President of China, president of the United States is not enough.
	Global governance.
	That's what it's all about.
	She's literally a superhero.
	It's in the title, too.
	I definitely, definitely, definitely think Danielle is a superhero.
	She has the power of knowledge as her weapon and kindness as like her strength.
	She can do all these things and she risks a lot.
	Danielle overcomes those panic attacks.
	Her vulnerabilities makes me feel like I can also do the same.
	When Danielle talks about learn by doing, she means that to learn, we have to experience it ourselves.
	Be kind and be smart.
	Be kind and be smart.
	You have to be kind to other people and then they'll be kind to you and you can accomplish many things that way.
	The companion book, How to Be a Danielle?
	I think that's a great addition that you should definitely read afterwards.
	I mean, yeah, no, get the companion book.
	You can be this person.
	And everybody's got to be kind.
	Right?
	And that's the soft guys.
	Like, let's talk about that for a second.
	I mean, what kind of person raises their kid?
	And I'm not saying that everybody does a good job or instills this value, but saying don't be nice to people.
	Of course, be kind to other people.
	Be understanding.
	But this whole thing, it's like, you know, a soft fascism where they sell you on this idea and it's the youth and it's like, no, you're hateful.
	See, if you're not being kind, you're hateful.
	And the hate speech has to be taken out by the artificial intelligence.
	Okay?
	That's how it actually works.
	Let's go back.
	And the companion piece is going to teach you how to be Danielle.
	You know, transhumanist.
	Open up that book and it tells you everything you need to know.
	You're really going to learn a lot from the book.
	Trust me.
	It's more than just a story.
	It's a guide.
	This book can definitely help change the world.
	It's humorous.
	It's funny.
	It makes you smarter.
	It helps you realize that the world can be a better place.
	Me personally reading it, I was just stunned by all of what Danielle was doing.
	When you finish, Danielle, you want to get up and you want to accomplish something today.
	After reading Danielle, I feel like I can change the world.
	If Danielle can do it, then I can do it.
	It's cool to be a Danielle.
	Recommend it to like my 15-year-old friends, you know.
	I would recommend the book to everybody.
	When you read this book, it'll change your life and it'll change mine.
	I'm Ryan, and I'm a Danielle.
	I'm Om, and I'm a Danielle.
	I'm Chris, and I'm a Danielle.
	I'm Dijon.
	I'm Timmy.
	I'm Jordan.
	I'm George.
	I'm Bodhi.
	I'm Elijah.
	I'm Sam.
	And I'm a Danielle.
	And I'm a Danielle.
	So, did you notice what else they snuck in here?
	There's no girls in there, is there?
	It's all the little boys.
	Man, I mean, there's, I mean, there's a bit of an effeminate tone with some of them.
	They're all Danielle's.
	See how they did that?
	But, you know, when people write books from transgender to transhuman and tell you their agenda outright, and you know, guys like Kurzweil have an alter ego called Ramona.
	I'm out of control.
	I'm the conspiracy nut for pointing this out.
	So again, yeah, they are targeting little girls.
	Here's the little boy ad.
	We'll go to the little girl ad in a bit.
	Okay, and we'll definitely, we're definitely going to play the adult ad.
	I want to see what they have for more videos right here.
	What do we have for more videos?
	Oh boy.
Heavy Metal's Orb of Evil 00:03:39
	We got plenty.
	Oh, we got Kurzweil on it.
	I mean, this is going to be a Danielle watch-along for sure.
	We can't get this.
	I mean, it's just watch Danielle's story by Ray Kurzweil in 360 virtual reality.
	Really, we can watch it.
	Oh, that's going to be fun.
	Just we're not in the upside down.
	Everything's okay.
	The guy who runs Google's immortality division, a company that notoriously works with the military-industrial complex, NASA in particular, on quantum computing.
	No big deal.
	It has classification levels most people can't imagine.
	I mean, it's probably at the crux of the signature reduction program.
	That's speculation.
	I'm speculating.
	But boy, you'd think, you know, companies like that, you'd certainly want that program running hot, if you will.
	Running really hot.
	So thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
	We don't even have 60 thumbs.
	Can we get 75?
	Remember, second hour is going to be at rvmrumble.com and over at Rumble's channel.
	If you were disappointed with what happened yesterday and I was disappointed with it, you can still get the other hour and a half or so over there.
	Again, I'm going to post it to my others later today.
	Hopefully, we'll get to that.
	Busy days, busy days, busy nights.
	And this word from our sponsor.
	Attention, Americans.
	Breaking news.
	Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
	Don't be fooled.
	It won't benefit you.
	Take action now.
	The Federal Reserve phase deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
	Be prepared.
	This may catch many off guard.
	Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
	But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
	Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar and volatile markets.
	Visit protectfrombiden.com.
	This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
	Be smart.
	Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
	Visit protectfrombiden.com to get your free guide and get started.
	Again, that's protect from biden.com.
	We are back.
	We're talking Kurzweil, the singularity, immortality.
	Immortal, yeah, they're just gonna, you know, they love us so much that in the next decade, they're gonna cure death for us.
	Absolutely in a world that they believe is already overpopulated and has to have a carbon regulation system, one in which they put you under a blockchain nightmare where they've already instituted an orb of evil, the Lochnar.
	In fact, I got to get back to Jay Dyer.
	We were talking about a broadcast on that Friday.
	And that's probably something we're definitely going to do: we're going to do a breakdown of heavy metal, the movie, and actual scenes of it.
	This will be good for the premium audience.
	Heavy metal, the movie, and the orb of evil, and world coin, and blockchain people, and smart contracts.
	Because that's the next step in this.
	See, you're going to have to acquiesce to all those things to get immortality.
	That's not really immortality.
	That's a digital clone that will, you know, convince you that somehow you can live forever in some virtual wonderverse.
Non Carbon, Wrong Hands 00:12:15
	But you're not.
	And meanwhile, they are going to try to biologically live forever.
	That's like legitimate.
	They're trying to do that too.
	And guys like Kurzweil sell you on the idea that you're going to be able to augment your body eventually into non-carbon all the way.
	Non-carbon all the way.
	Whoa.
	I mean, that's in the age of spiritual machines, non-carbon life forms.
	You want to know why there's a war on carbon?
	Because these people are buying into this transhumanist, really post-human future.
	It's gross.
	So let's see what the little girls have to say about Danielle.
	We're going to ask you a couple questions today.
	First off, who is Danielle?
	Strong and smart, very, very intelligent, outgoing, like a role model.
	She's kind of bossy.
	Amazing what she can do at such a young age.
	She doesn't take anything from anybody.
	It's a book about a girl that can do all the things we wish we could do.
	She helped in like Africa, China, the U.S. Half of Africa got water in the book.
	She solved cancer.
	That's pretty big.
	Just stop it right there.
	Africa got water in the book.
	Africa's continents are the most resource-rich places possibly on the entire planet.
	Okay?
	And they have been exploited to the point where, again, the people that are behind this green movement and trying to solve environmental issues have tricked you into the idea of lithium batteries and cobalt mines where these people are literal slave.
	We played some of the videos, literal slaves and child slaves.
	They got water.
	And you notice that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, they've got all the shiggity shot and nots in the world for the third world, especially Africa, because they love them so much and they're going to give them immortality in the next decade.
	They have all those in the world.
	But somehow, some way, we just can't find a way for them to be able to, I don't know, not be totally and completely dominated and exploited for their resources and partake in, talk about inequity, okay, and partake in their wealth system and have it have a, you know, an actual clean water and electrical infrastructure.
	Get the F out of here.
	That's imagination.
	And obviously, you know, there are parts of Africa that do have that.
	That do have that.
	So, I mean, oh, she got water to Africa.
	She figured it out.
	She cured cancer.
	Danielle's going to do everything.
	Like, the problem is they don't want, I mean, in my film, Invisible Empire, I believe he was, I think he's, he's obviously an African representative.
	And he's talking about the United Nations and these new policies and this push for a quote-unquote new world order by Bush and his cronies.
	Madeleine Albright makes a comment on it.
	You know, the one that said it was worth it to kill all those people in Iraq.
	It was worth it.
	You know, we got to beta test all our toys.
	It was worth it.
	We got to build the infrastructure of a police state here at home, of a total surveillance state.
	It's totally worth it.
	And she comments on the New World Order.
	But this guy says the correct thing.
	He's like, look, the possibility of a unipolar government could be quite dangerous.
	Especially when they can change the rules at a whim, which they've already done to them, he says.
	He goes, sometimes the rules would favor us only for the system to be changed and not allow us to have those advantages.
	And that's what this will constantly be.
	It just, it blows my mind.
	It was really overwhelming, I think, for her to have all that on her.
	I think Danielle is a really brave person.
	I think it touched on a lot of important topics that a lot of people are afraid to talk about.
	Hunger and poverty, animal cruelty, human trafficking, pollution, environmental issues.
	Some of the things she did was very like, whoa, that's a lot.
	She has the superpower of intelligence that gives her the power to be able to make a difference and to have the willpower to go out and make a difference.
	The more you know, the more power you have, I think.
	Being smart allows you to pursue the tasks that you want to.
	Learning by doing is better than just learning by not doing.
	So right here, you know, we have the obvious misnomers, but when you're being misled, I mean, they've got human trafficking in here.
	I mean, I got to get this book.
	I mean, maybe they're going to read the whole book in that one video.
	I doubt it.
	I guess that's going to be the next thing.
	We're going to do a sit-down read-along.
	You know, I'm not going to dress in drag or anything.
	I know that's going to disappoint people, but we're going to read a children's book here.
	I did quickly look for the PDF of this in the last, like, I think I found this about 20 minutes before broadcast.
	So usually what I do, again, guys, you know, is I have an idea for what I'm going to do the night before.
	I have a couple videos queued up.
	But again, I get up and I really do prepare for the show and I'm like, man, I really want this to be the theme.
	What can I find?
	And this stuff blows my mind every time.
	But it shows you this indoctrination.
	Yeah, of course, learning by doing is better.
	But they're selling you on an Imagination Land superheroine, a superheroine that's a transhumanist and a globalist and is going to fix all the problems of the world.
	We're always told they're going to fix all the problems of the world.
	And, you know, I caught, I think I've talked about it on air, maybe not, but I caught the third Guardians of the Galaxy finally.
	And first of all, I recommend it.
	I think it's actually a really good film.
	I don't know if it's a kids' movie.
	I know the first two are a little risky.
	If you got a 10-year-old, I don't know if this is the one for them.
	I'm just telling you that right now.
	Because it deals with a lot of not only Genetic manipulation, but all sorts of transhumanist themes, and really this idea of creating a utopian society and this constant promise of a utopian society.
	And we see it again and again and again in the real world and you know, by these authoritative figures, by these fantasists.
	Like, I'm sorry, either Kurzweil is playing a character or he is extremely naive in some of the aspects of this.
	Although it couldn't be in the wrong hands, it's already in the wrong hands.
	You work for Google, bruh, or Alphabet.
	I'd really like to do more learning by doing, just like Danielle.
	And she's like, you know, we'll just like cross the bump when we get there and figure it out anyway.
	People that are smart and kind, they can do anything.
	Yeah, I think they go hand in hand.
	I think you have to be smart to be kind.
	Being smart is not a bad thing.
	When you put it in the right direction or you use it in the right way, it can really make a change in the world.
	I enjoy.
	Like, again, the idea that being smart could be some kind of detriment.
	I know, I know we grew up in a society where the cool kids weren't this.
	Ah, you're a smart guy, huh?
	But, like, everybody at a base level knows that being smart is a good thing.
	It's a good thing to be able to use your brain and have critical thinking.
	Ah, being smart and being kind go hand in hand.
	I don't know about that either.
	I know plenty of very, very nice people and good-hearted people that maybe are, you know, maybe not the brightest or the most informed.
	And that's fine.
	All God's creatures got a place in the choir.
	Some sing low, some sing higher.
	I mean, come on.
	At the same time, it's, I mean, isn't that what Forrest Gump's all about?
	Like, he acknowledges he's not a smart man.
	He's pretty kind.
	And he gets through life.
	And I get that's a fictitious character.
	But it just, the idea that children, the idea that being smart would be a detriment, not a good thing.
	That's, yeah, no, being smart is a good thing.
	Problem solving is a good thing.
	Critical thinking is a good thing.
	At the end of the book, where you could read through all the resources, the step-by-step guide at the end.
	And I was actually able to look at some of the links.
	And I was able to see that we can make a difference in the world.
	It encourages girls to pursue their wildest dreams.
	Danielle definitely inspired me.
	Like, if she could do it, I'm sure I could figure out a way.
	I'm Kayla and I'm a Danielle.
	I'm Anna and I'm a Danielle.
	I'm Miriam and I'm a Danielle.
	I'm Sophia and I'm a Danielle.
	Be kind and be smart.
	You know, like the critics will be like, Burmese is going after the be kind, be smart people.
	So Danielle's been around for five years.
	I was wondering when this came out.
	But that kind of makes sense.
	The Transformers Conference with Roth Blatt is in that 2000, I think, 16 marker.
	All that stuff.
	So let's see what adults have to say.
	Now we've got the adults.
	The adults are back.
	Remember, they told us when Joe Biden got in office?
	The adults are back in office.
	The adults are here.
	These are the adults right here.
	I am a real life rocketist.
	I'm a waitress.
	I'm a professor.
	I'm a rapper.
	I am a consultant scientist in cancer research.
	I am a freelance software developer.
	I'm a host on Gamer World News.
	I am a GIS technician for a solar power company.
	I'm a shipping associate for a retail store.
	I work as a substitute teacher.
	Danielle is the type of person who I think I aspire to be.
	She's like the ultimate how I wish I was.
	She's using her mind and using her gifts and talents to like help everyone.
	She keeps seeking out like water flowing the various ways that she can have an influence.
	She doesn't ask for permission.
	She just has the passion and she goes for it.
	That really should be what a superhero is, is someone like Danielle.
	What Danielle said that really resonated with me was the idea of being kind and being smart.
	You can use your intelligence for good or for evil, but you have to be able to temper that intelligence with kindness and the desire to do good in the world.
	I mean, the kind and smart thing is kind of over the top.
	And look, I keep saying that good and evil are an eternal battle.
	You're never going to get rid of them.
	They're part of it.
	I think they're inbuilt in human nature, unfortunately.
	And that's kind of what free will is like, you have the ability to choose.
	It's the ultimate choose your own adventure game that's called your life.
	So we'll point that out.
	Let's continue on.
	Of the greatest lessons from the book is the concept of learn by doing.
	Learn by doing is the quintessential element of success.
	What I love about the book, and the reason why I would recommend it to you, is that the back of the book gives you guides and websites and organizations you can contact to help you with your goals.
	I mean, that's really what we got to do.
	When we read the book, then we get to go to the guides and the organizations and the websites.
	And I guarantee they're all promoting globalism.
Learn By Doing 00:02:38
	They're all promoting what?
	You know, your carbon credit score.
	But you're going to be kind.
	And you're going to be kind to the earth.
	And the thing, listen, I'll give Kurzwal himself, you know, he talks about abundance a lot, and he says the overpopulation is a myth.
	So he's not the one constantly hammering down your throat this idea that we're killing the planet.
	In fact, you know, I actually have a clip of him talking about the opposite.
	But at the same time, he is selling you on the idea that consciousness, really, and sentience is no longer a scientific question.
	Of course, it is.
	Of course, it is.
	100%.
	It's not philosophical.
	It's a scientific question.
	Okay.
	We're going to cut to another break.
	Final segment of the first hour coming up.
	And I want to let everybody know the second hour is over at rvmrumble.com.
	On top of being at rvmrumble.com.
	Remember, redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored to get the big interviews, the exclusives before everybody else.
	Sam Husseini and Ryan Christian, right now up there.
	You're going to want to check them out.
	They are good.
	We played a lot of that yesterday.
	They are good.
	In fact, a lot of the second hour got samples of that.
	Yeah, but you didn't, or I guess even in the first hour, too.
	I'm not sure if I played any before they got cut off, but good stuff, McGruff.
	All right, now a word from our sponsor.
	We interrupt today's programming to bring unfortunate news.
	Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
	Don't be fooled.
	It won't benefit you.
	So take action now.
	The Federal Reserve Space Deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
	Be prepared.
	This may catch many off guard and put your hard-earned assets in jeopardy.
	But here's the good news: there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
	Speak to someone at American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar and volatile markets.
	Dial 833, the number two USA gold.
	Yes, call now 833-287-2465.
	This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
	Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
	Call 833, the number two USA goals.
	Yes, call now.
	833-287-2465.
Claire Joins the Communist Party 00:10:05
	Act swiftly.
	833-287-2465.
	All right.
	The internet.
	But the internet is tracking.
	Oh, don't worry, we're going to get there.
	We're going to get to that one.
	One of my favorite commercials.
	See, I forget sometimes.
	All right.
	So we're continuing on.
	These are all people gushing over the transhumanist children's book, Danielle by the Kurzweils.
	Just really, be kind and be smart.
	Everything else will take care of itself.
	Be kind and be smart.
	Strong, fierce.
	The accompanying materials provide the framework for you to take the next step, you as the reader, to take the next step.
	The link to the resources can teach people like me and also, I think, for a lot of young kids how to become involved in the world.
	Whether you're five years old or 105, you can pull out lessons from this.
	I know for myself, I really appreciate having the book now and having it kind of as a reference.
	Actively seeking out ways how I can help or what I can do is what I'm looking forward to.
	I mean, are these like the people that also do the adult coloring books a lot?
	I mean, or do they just stick to the kids' coloring books?
	Well, it could be like the way it is in the Danielle story, but now.
	It doesn't matter who you are, where you come from, how old you are, you can make a difference.
	I would recommend Danielle to everybody.
	It's something that transcends age, transcends race.
	No matter what you're into, whether that's science or philosophy or entertainment, it has everything.
	If you've ever wanted to be completely blown away by someone's achievements, Danielle will actually redefine your normal.
	I mean, is this going to be the hot new summer film eventually?
	Like 10 years.
	I mean, 10 years from now, if we're not all immortal, you know, but they're still selling us on the utopia and the immortality, is this going to be like the next Barbie movie?
	Just a thought.
	I don't know that's actually going to happen.
	Not quite the cultural icon they wanted Danielle to be.
	But I mean, geez, geez, Luis.
	One person can make all the difference in the world.
	I'm Paul Hynek, and I'm a Danielle.
	I'm Emily, and I'm a Danielle.
	My name's Pete Freeland, and I'm a Danielle.
	And I'm a Danielle.
	Oh, adults are Danielle.
	Adults are Danielle.
	That's just the best.
	Hold on.
	See, I lost the whole thing.
	I had the list.
	There we go.
	That's what we want.
	There's where we want to be.
	There's where we want to be.
	So we've done what?
	These three, right?
	Adults react.
	We don't need to do readers react to how you can be a Danielle companion book.
	I do want to see what Kurzweil has to say about it and then what this 360-degree virtual reality world is.
	Let's check that out too.
	All right.
	Here's Ray.
	Oh, wait a minute.
	Oh, this is a 50-minute thing.
	Events and news.
	Yeah, from four years ago when they were still promoting this.
	So, no, we're not going to do that one.
	Sorry.
	However, if this is the full book, maybe we'll do this.
	No, it's like a 320, but we're still doing it.
	So she's getting on a plane.
	That's cool.
	What's in 3D?
	I don't want, I want 2D, please.
	What is there?
	Let's go.
	1080.
	Okay, she's in China.
	That's nice.
	Oh, this is too much.
	Chris is asking me who Danielle is.
	Danielle.
	This.
	How long do I have?
	Precisely 11 minutes.
	It's really starting to sink in that I've actually been elected chairman of the Communist Party of China.
	Some people seem surprised because, well, I'm a 15-year-old girl from Los Angeles.
	I suppose part of me is surprised too, but the other part has been expecting it.
	It's been a complicated path to get here.
	I started out innocuously as a child that didn't talk.
	I didn't really see the point of it, at least until I had something to say.
	I loved books.
	I taught myself to read, but I didn't want people to know.
	I purposefully held my book upside down to throw my sister Claire off track.
	Claire, by the way, was an orphan from a Haitian earthquake that mom and dad adopted two years before I was born.
	An orphan from a Haitian.
	I mean, boy, they're gonna ham it up in this.
	By the way, let's throw that in there.
	Well, I finally joined the conversation and said my first words when I was two.
	Mom was shocked at my insights into the word onomatopoeia and dropped the blueberry dessert all over Claire and me.
	But dad took it in stride.
	I wasn't very good at making friends.
	Well, at least the other kids had a good time at my fourth birthday party.
	I finally made my first friend when I was six in Zambia, halfway around the world.
	I went there with Claire to help with the drought.
	We ran into a lot of predicaments, like feuding warlords.
	By my calculation, we solved one-third of 1% of the water problem.
	So, I mean, feuding.
	I mean, this is what all these people are praising.
	It seems pretty hack job.
	No offense to the art, but really not the best art either.
	Like, not great art.
	Not a great story.
	I mean, maybe this is just summing it up, but I mean, hey, they beat the warlords.
	You know, I mean, made her first friend at six.
	Wasn't good at birthday parties.
	And, like, we're doing it in the 3D virtual universe.
	Notice that?
	Ooh, we're there.
	We're in the metaverse.
	We're in the metaverse.
	The world discovered me at eight when I was debuting at the country music festival.
	But I learned that fame has a steep price.
	The peace conference that Claire organized in Libya turned out to be kind of a disaster.
	I ended up protecting the rebels and my sister with software viruses from our outpost in the Libyan desert.
	Negotiating a Middle East peace agreement was more complicated than I expected.
	Was it?
	Yeah, it was more complicated than you expected.
	What is this?
	This is out of control.
	This is what they're trying to sell you on?
	Man, she's so powerful.
	She's fierce.
	And she's powerful.
	And hey, I wonder if she stopped the slave trade in Libya caused by this regime with the cackle, the first cackle monster, because Kamala embarrassed has got that thing unlocked right now.
	But Hillary Rodham, we came, we saw he died.
	Wonder if they got into that at all.
	Huh?
	I mean, she's with the rebels over in Libya.
	But I had help from a wise rabbi in Brooklyn.
	Tragedy struck when I was 14.
	I discovered that there is an unrelenting finality to death.
	Well, I'd better gather my thoughts on my acceptance speech.
	I'm the first teenage girl to be elected chairman of the Communist Party of China.
	Okay.
	I mean, if it couldn't get more ludicrous, the Communist Party of China chose a little white girl to be its chairman.
	Because, you know, the Communist Party of China by this time is extremely progressive.
	She heads the CCP.
	I mean, I'm sure that's a good thing.
	Right?
	I mean, it's pretty crazy.
	And I'm not even Chinese.
	I have to say, I'm not really comfortable with that title of chairman.
	How about chairwoman?
	No, that doesn't make sense either.
	I'm only 15.
	Someone suggested I'd be just called chair, and I'm not a piece of furniture.
	I've got a chair girl.
	She did it.
	She's a 15-year-old girl, and she heads the Communist Party.
	This is what Ray Kurzweil puts together, and everybody's just like, amazing.
	Fantastic.
	Let's applaud him.
	I mean, pretty wild stuff.
	Pretty damn wild stuff.
	I didn't even play this.
	What is this?
	This is the trailer for it?
	It can't be better than that, right?
	Guess we're going to find out.
	People always ask me, what's it like?
	What's it like to be the sister of a superheroine?
	I tell them it's fun.
	I remember when our stage was small and we sing our stuffed animals to sleep.
	I tell them it's beautiful.
	I remember the night we traveled across Zambia by donkey.
	We'd come to help with the water crisis.
	I tell them it's exhilarating.
	I remember the moment Danielle resolved the Libyan civil war.
	Resolve the Libyan civil.
	I just can't get over it.
	I mean, just, and it's not like good art.
Ip Vanish: Chat & Answers 00:12:26
	And by the way, guys, my software hasn't crashed, but I can no longer change scenes all of a sudden.
	This is really problematic, XSplit.
	I've talked you up forever, and then all of a sudden this is happening.
	And I doubt it's a hardware issue.
	Saw somebody in the comments again saying, you need 99 and 4090.
	We got a 4070 TI, i7, 13, 70K, 64 gigabytes of RAM in this bad boy.
	None of this should be happening.
	Not a thing.
	None of it.
	I mean, it looks like it's time to do a whole reformat.
	But luckily, I'll still be able to drag everything.
	You're just going to have to see me for the IP Vanish commercial and everything else.
	I do want to remind everybody, the second hour, we're actually going to get to some Kurzweil stuff where we're going to play Kurzweil.
	You know what?
	Let's just bring that over here now since we're just here for the rest of the show.
	There'll be no transitions.
	It'll just be my little corner spot.
	Hopefully the whole thing doesn't crash, right?
	That's what we're hoping for.
	Thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
	When we get back into the second hour, we are going to play Ray talking about the chat GPT models and all these other things.
	We are going to play clips of Martine Rothblatt talking about transhumanism and doppelgangers and digital clones and the whole nine.
	I'm probably going to end up playing the blockchain people thing.
	In fact, that's exactly what we're going to do when we come back.
	After this word, which now I'm going to be a part of, from IP Vanish.
	And by the way, I actually use IP Vanish.
	I absolutely have it on my phones and my devices here.
	It's a great VPN.
	We love the internet, but the internet is tracking everything you do.
	Take control of your online privacy with IP Vanish.
	People with malicious intent are everywhere watching you.
	Criminals can hack your Wi-Fi while broadband providers and advertisers monitor your data.
	With IP Vanish on your device, your internet activity is encrypted.
	No one can see what you're doing.
	Your location, your connection, completely hidden.
	Protect your internet privacy today with IP Vanish.
	Yeah, no, actually, I'm looking in the comments.
	No, this is Kurzweil, the piano maker.
	Yes, he's the Kurzweil keyboard guy.
	Same guy.
	100%.
	You know, if you're tuning in late, you know, Ray didn't just write Danielle.
	Ray's done a lot of things.
	And yes, he's the Kurzweil keyboard man.
	He is the piano guy.
	100%.
	All right, YouTube.
	We are going to go over to the second hour.
	Again, I wish that I could do my regular show.
	I mean, I just angers me to no end.
	It gets so frustrating.
	I like being in control.
	And when software does not work the way it's supposed to, it makes me just a wee bit upset.
	It's getting buggy out there.
	X split.
	Let's fix the problem.
	Thumbs up, subscribe, and share.
	RVM Rumble for the second hour, guys.
	Remember, redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored, redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
	A dollar for the first week, $10 a month, $100 for the year.
	Help support the broadcast and get those premium interviews before anybody else.
	Ryan Christian of The Last American Vagabond and Sam Husseini currently.
	All right, guys, I love you, but we'll see you on the flip side, YouTube.
	All right.
	Luckily, we can still do that, and we're off the tubins.
	Forget about the tubins.
	And we're going to shift gears.
	Let's bring this back up.
	Boom.
	And we're going to play this clip of Kurzweil talking about chat GPT and large language models with this individual that looks a lot like Kurzweil.
	You're joining us for this seminar five days after the release of OpenAI's chat GPT, which astounded many across the world in its ability to synthesize natural language responses to really complicated questions and assignments.
	And by the way, so again, this is about seven months ago, right around that launch.
	I do want to thank, let's see, Melissa Kelly.
	Thank you so much for that tipsky and hutch.
	And I also got one last night.
	Carrie Nanstadt, thank you.
	Truth Bearer, as always, guys, for those tips.
	I really, really do appreciate it.
	So here's Kurzweil.
	And again, remember, I was trying to, you know, I was goofing on him a little in the beginning of the show.
	Look at that mop.
	It's ridiculous.
	I mean, is that even real?
	Are they even plugs?
	Is that a hair piece?
	It's ridiculous.
	You're 75 years old, man.
	Like, in actuality, the guy on the right, again, this is why I thought it was an epic rap battle of history, looks more like Kurzweil than Kurzweil looks like Kurzweil.
	Is that crazy of me to point out?
	Or is that just like totally, you know, there?
	Amber King, thank you so much.
	I did not see that.
	That didn't come up.
	It says, she says, it's that simple, Jason.
	Good or evil.
	Definitely not scientism.
	How does one machine learn by doing?
	Much love, Roar Media fam.
	Thank you, Amber.
	Amber King.
	Maybe we need to get her on.
	Roar Media.
	I know that.
	I think they're over on Rockfin as well.
	All right, let's continue because here we go.
	This is going to be Kurzweil talking about chat GPT and large language models.
	If you've gotten to glimpse this technology, could you place it on the Kurzweil map for singularity?
	Is this a step forward?
	Is it a distraction?
	Is it related in any way?
	Well, large language models occurred three years ago and they seemed quite compelling.
	They weren't totally fully there.
	You could chat with it, and sometimes it would kind of break down.
	I mean, it's still not fully there.
	It makes stuff up.
	It lies.
	Still not.
	I mean, it's released now for more than half a year, and it's totally and completely biased.
	The amount of new ideas that are going into large language models has been astounding.
	And so it's like every other week there's a new large language model and some new variation that's more and more realistic.
	So that's going to continue to happen.
	And so this is just another issue.
	I mean, there are some things I think that are quite right with that particular model you mentioned.
	But people have actually interacted with these things, and some people say they're sentient.
	I don't actually think they're sentient yet, but I think they're actually moving in that direction.
	And that's actually not a scientific issue.
	It's actually a philosophical issue.
	I disagree.
	I think it is a scientific issue.
	And the reason they want to bring it into philosophy, because philosophy doesn't necessarily have to be truth, does it?
	There are plenty of philosophies out there that may not be so kind, Mr. Kurzweil, that may not be so benevolent, but can be argued in such a manner and promoted in a social landscape that one day they gain legal relevance.
	And even Rothblatt admits, once it gets into the hands of lawyers and we establish that these beings have rights, which they intend to do, all bets will be off.
	All bets will be off.
	I mean, we're already heading into that territory right now.
	As to what you consider sentient or not.
	Although it's a very important issue, because I would chat with Marvin Minsky, who was my mentor for 50 years, and he said that sentience is not scientific, so therefore forget it.
	It's an illusion.
	That's not my opinion.
	If you had a world that had no sentience in it, it may as well not exist.
	But yes, there was a sizable advance, but there's more to come.
	Let me ask a question from Charlotte Brees, a philosopher, an AI-informed philosopher.
	What do you make of the criticism that there's more to intelligence than brute processing speed and pattern recognition?
	That if we want to pass the Turing test, we need to learn more about our own evolved, how our own intelligence evolved.
	And I'll just Paraphrase you in The Singularity is Near, comparing cognition to chaotic computing models where unpredictable interaction of millions of processes, many of which contain random and unpredictable elements, provide robotic spectrum.
	By the way, that's on their end.
	Like this guy, like obviously, this thing doesn't have, you know, he's at the Boston Children's Hospital dressed like Kurzweil and obviously a fanboy.
	Now, for those that don't know what the Turing test is that he's discussing, it's whether or not an AI can fool somebody into believing that they are human.
	And you could argue that we've already probably passed the Turing test, at least in some of the classified technology.
	We're on the verge of doing so, consumer technology.
	Obviously, deep fakes will have a large part in that.
	We already have audio type deep fakes, but as far as the Turing test, we've had this interactions between the chatbot stuff.
	Now, Kurzweil himself wants, I believe it's Ramona, his alter ego, to be the first to pass the Turing test.
	But then Rothblatt is in competition and has a robot called Bina 48.
	Yes?
	Bina 48 that is Rothblatt's wife and was with Rothblatt and has children with Rothblatt before Rothblatt went from Martin to Martine.
	And Bina 48 is this, you know, it's got the Hansen robotics type face.
	That's what Martine would like to pass, the Turing test.
	Okay?
	And that's what's really going on.
	And I'm wondering exactly what Kurzweil is going to say about the Turing test in light of the fact that these large language models have now been released and that we also have more and more of the automation and robotics coming into play along with deepfakes.
	So let's see what he's got to say.
	And appropriate answers to subtle questions of recognition.
	And so, you know, in this chaotic computing, how can you address Charlotte's question about our own intelligence and the path forward AI?
	It is a good observation.
	But chaos and unpredictability can also be simulated in computers.
Beyond Human Capabilities 00:14:29
	Large language models do that because you can't always predict how it's going to answer.
	And a lot of these models, you can actually ask the same question multiple times and you get different answers.
	So it depends on kind of the mood of the large language model at that time.
	And to make it more realistic, it does have to take that level into account when it answers.
	At first, we could ask a question and it would give you a paragraph that could answer your question.
	Now it can actually give you several pages.
	It can't, though, give you a whole novel that can be coherent and answer your question.
	So it's not able to do what humans can do.
	Not many humans can do it, but some humans can write a whole novel that would answer a question.
	Let me stop.
	First of all, no.
	The vast majority of humans, if given the time and direction, could 100,000% write a novel.
	This is like the hubris of these people.
	The little people can't write a novel.
	The little folk.
	No.
	Come on.
	Like everything out there, all skill sets are kind of muscle memory.
	And sure, varying degrees of how good that novel is going to be or what kind of question it's going to answer, how long it's going to be.
	Again, that's training.
	Human beings are incredible.
	The vast majority of us could do that.
	And look, yeah, these things can write pages.
	And that's why Holly Weird is ready to bring in the AI and get rid of traditional directors and get rid of a bunch of their script writers and have a bunch of different choices to go through that are artificially created and then kind of editorialized by a few.
	And eventually it'll get better and better and better.
	One of the things that I'm really noting from this interview is how slow Ray is talking.
	Now, there are times that he gets going, but again, age is a bitch, huh, Ray?
	Huh?
	I mean, look, it sucks.
	We all degrade over time.
	It's just kind of one of the, and I don't necessarily think that's the greatest thing ever.
	Again, the quest for the fountain of youth, you know, living a long, healthy life, not suffering ailments at the end.
	Those are all things not only I want for myself, but those around me that I love.
	Those are great goals.
	Those are cool.
	But am I going to put a ridiculous mop top on my head?
	Am I going to dye my hair like that?
	Or am I going to age gracefully like Kurz Wild 2 over here?
	I bet you that guy's like not even 40 either over at the Boston's Children's Hospital there.
	And he's doing it better than Ray.
	But let's continue.
	Let's keep listening to what Ray has to say about ChatGPT and the singularity and whether or not we're going to see touring test models, et cetera, et cetera.
	So that's the answer.
	It has to actually cover a large amount of material, have an unpredictable element, but also be coherent as one work.
	And we're seeing that happen gradually.
	Each new large language model is able to actually cover a much broader array of material.
	But it definitely can handle stuff that is not.
	It's not just giving you a predictable amount of man.
	Ray is really struggling.
	He's pulling out his inner body.
	Maybe I need to see more of him talking this year.
	I mean, 75, again, no spring chicken, Ray.
	It has a way that is not really totally predictable.
	So along those lines, let me pose Jane Bernstein's question, which is, what is your definition of intelligence?
	I mean, intelligence is to solve difficult problems with limitations of resources, including time.
	So you can't take, you know, a million years to solve a problem.
	If you can solve it quickly, then you're showing intelligence.
	And that's why somebody who's more intelligent might be able to solve problems more quickly.
	But we're seeing that in area after area.
	I mean, AlphaFold, for example, can actually do things that humans can't do very quickly.
	Or to play something like Go, it goes way beyond what humans can do.
	In fact, Lee Sedal, who's the best human player in Go in the world, says he's not going to play Go anymore because machines can play it so much better than he can.
	But that's actually not my view that it's going to replace us.
	I think we're going to actually make ourselves smarter by merging with it, as I said.
	So I'll ask a question from Sharon Weinstock.
	With AI taking over physical and intellectual achievements and individuals living longer, do you have thoughts on society and whether individuals risk lacking a purpose?
	Well, it's good to hear from you, Sharon.
	That's the whole point of our merging with intelligence.
	I mean, if we just if AI was something separate from us It is something separate from us, by the way.
	Like, like that's like, see, he knows that this is that human beings need a purpose.
	That's why a universal basic income is a bad thing.
	That's why you being trained to not want to work, not want to achieve, just want to get by.
	It's not good.
	It's not good for the human soul.
	We're all about our achievements and competition and knowledge.
	It serves a purpose, our purpose, achievements, goals.
	And basically he's saying, well, if it's a separate thing, man, boy, that's bad.
	But we're going to merge with it.
	It's going to enhance our intelligence.
	We live forever.
	Come on.
	It's definitely going to do everything that go way beyond what humans can do.
	So we really have to merge with them to make ourselves smarter.
	But that's why we create these things.
	I mean, we're separate from other animals in that we can think of a solution, implement it, and then make ourselves better.
	So if you look at take what human beings were doing for work 200 years ago, 80% had to do with creating food.
	That's now down to 2%.
	And so, if I were to say, oh, well, you know, all these jobs are going to go away and machines are going to do them, people say, oh, well, there's nothing for us to do.
	But actually, the amount of the percentage of people that are employed has gone way up.
	The amount of money that we're making per hour has gone way up.
	Not the value of our money.
	That's not real.
	And when we talk about the food supply, yeah, there's detriments to the fact that we've consolidated the food supply and that we've made it impossible for smaller farms to exist.
	It's not a net positive.
	All right.
	Now, at the same time, do I think that 80% should be creating their own food?
	Probably not.
	If you were at like the 10 to 20% level and you had community share and basically farms and gardens that were of a circular greenhouse upward system, I think that would be kind of the solution.
	But they don't want that.
	They want genetically modified organisms.
	They want what they call directed evolution.
	And they say, well, okay, but what are we going to be doing?
	I say, well, you're going to be doing IT engineering and protein folding.
	And no one would have any idea what we're talking about because those ideas didn't exist.
	So we're going to make ourselves smarter.
	That's why we create these capabilities.
	So it's not going to be us versus AI.
	AI is going to go inside of us and make us much smarter than we were before.
	So yes, I think if we did not do that, then it would be very difficult to know what human beings would be doing because machines would be doing everything better.
	But we're going to be doing it because the AI is going to work through us.
	Arnold Wilkinson has a question that I think relates to your idea of whether it's a dystopian society or other.
	But really more specific, he says that he would expect people with various political and/or personal agendas to harness the increasing power of AI for their own purposes.
	It will not necessarily be to the long-term benefit of humankind.
	And we're already seeing that.
	We're already seeing that.
	That's a good question.
	As a whole.
	So how does this balance out?
	Could you go through that again?
	I didn't quite say individuals with political and personal agendas may use AI for purposes that are not beneficial to mankind.
	How does that balance out?
	Well, I mean, every new technology has positive and negative aspects.
	The railroad did tremendous destruction, but it also benefited society.
	So it's not that technology is always positive.
	Social networks, I mean, there's certainly a lot of commentary as to how it is negative.
	Yeah, but you guys' commentary on why it's negative.
	When I say you guys, the establishment is this idea that information counter to the mainstream is misinformation and disinformation.
	And then, you know, you don't focus enough on the fact that you're causing a bunch of people in my generation, sometimes even older, but mostly younger, to be narcissistic sociopaths constantly, beholden to their devices and detached from reality and wanting to be absorbed into this metaverse that's being pushed by you people.
	And his question really wasn't about the double-edged sword of technology.
	He was talking about that darker side of the technology and whether or not it would be utilized for political agendas, which we've already seen it do 100%.
	And that's true.
	But no one actually would want to do completely without social networks.
	And I make the case that we're actually using technology and measuring the kinds of things that we associate with positive social benefit.
	Is the positive social benefit the benefit of your bosses, the people who own Calico, who own Google, who own YouTube, to censor broadcasts like mine and not allow us to be monetized while shadow banning us and saying that we're harmful content?
	Is that the benefit of these things?
	No, it's exactly what the question is.
	It's already in their hands.
	It's already being utilized as a major tool.
	It's actually increasing as the technology gets better.
Increasing Technology Utilization 00:15:57
	And that's actually not known.
	I mean, if you ask a poll as to whether these things are getting better or worse, people will say they're getting worse.
	Whereas they're actually getting better.
	But it's not that everything is positive.
	I mean, there are negative aspects of it, and that's why we need to keep working on how we use these technologies.
	Here's a question from Arts Ham.
	Notice he didn't really answer the question at all, you know, as to how to safeguard from tyrants and governments and politicized agendas from utilizing this.
	He didn't have an answer for that at all.
	Just like, oh, well, God take the good with the bad.
	You take the good, you take the bad, you take them both, and then you have a facts of life.
	Kurzweil's facts of life.
	But, Bayan, the singularity is near.
	In that book, you speculated that the risk of bioterrorism or engineering of viruses will become an existential threat.
	Since then, do you think this risk to humanity has increased or decreased?
	Cat got your tongue, Kurzweil?
	I mean, geez, he's really having trouble with this.
	I wonder if he wants to reveal whether or not the COVID-19 e4 virus was bioengineered in labs.
	I mean, and again, utilized by tyrannical governments working behind the scenes through, I would say, NGOs, non-government organizations and cabals for a globalist agenda.
	I mean, they just did it.
	They just did.
	Talked extensively about that aspect with Sam Husseini, and I've talked at length about that aspect with Ryan Christian in the past, both part of what?
	The premium, redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
	Just throwing that out there.
	It's increased.
	I mean, I mean, I have a chapter in Singularity is Near, and there's also another one in Singularity is Nearer on risks.
	And all of these technologies have risks, and they could also do us in.
	And I don't think that's the likelihood of that has increased.
	But I remain optimistic.
	And if you look at the actual history of how we use technology, you could point to various things that should have gone wrong.
	Like every single job that we had in 1900, a year ago, a little over a century ago, is gone.
	And yet we're still working.
	Not true.
	Let me just go through off the top of my head a number, a number of jobs that have not gone away since 1900, 123 years ago.
	Okay.
	Journalist, not gone away.
	Person that cuts your hair, barber, hairstylist, whatever.
	It's expanded actually.
	Hair care.
	Not that Ray would know with that mop over there that looks like a bad hairpiece.
	Okay, so there's two out of the gates.
	Obviously, 120 plus years ago, restaurants also existed.
	The service industry existed.
	Bartenders existed.
	I mean, I'd go down the line.
	There are plenty of jobs and careers that existed.
	120 farmers existed.
	They're still around.
	Still the real deal.
	Okay.
	All real.
	All happening now.
	I mean, I'd go down the list.
	During that time, 120 years ago, you did start.
	You know, he talked about the railway system.
	Now, we may not be building railroads, but there certainly is railway upkeep.
	And the job may have changed as of a conductor.
	Certainly still have those.
	I mean, what's he talking about?
	He's supposed to be a smart guy.
	Not all the jobs.
	Carpenters are still very real.
	Stonemasons are still very real.
	There are tradesman craft out there that are well over 100 years old.
	Come on, Ray.
	Come on.
	Now, is there a multitude of other jobs?
	Would Jason Burmes be up here streaming away?
	No, no.
	But somewhere along those lines, you get the advent of the radio, and there are people talking for a living.
	You know, now we're around 1900, we're at the turn of the century.
	Baseball, I mean, sports exist.
	You can keep going and going and going and going and going.
	Actually, no, Ray.
	Over the last century plus, a lot of careers that are still around have been built up.
	Some things are gone.
	Some things have expanded.
	Obviously, electronics, right?
	Obviously, wireless and satellite technology.
	I mean, we go car manufacturer, those type of factory work has changed, but people still work in factories and onlines.
	A lot of that is automated and different.
	But the idea that all work has changed over.
	No, that's imagination land.
	And making actually more money.
	And he keeps talking about more money.
	How much is the money worth, Ray?
	Why is it, you know, I was out to lunch with a buddy.
	And he's just gone home to Nebraska.
	Big family, lots of brothers and sisters.
	And we were in a restaurant.
	He goes, you know, imagine my house being like three of these restaurants stacked on top of each other.
	And I go, Liz, I know the deal because people used to have five to seven kids.
	And you used to be able to own your home without like a 30-year mortgage.
	And you used to be able to have a car, maybe two.
	And it would be one person working for those five people in the home.
	That's not real anymore.
	So again, you're going to trust this guy who's already giving you so many misnomers and a slanted view on history.
	Probably a bad idea.
	Probably a bad idea.
	The way we've used technology has been very beneficial to human beings so far.
	I agree with that for the most part.
	But again, like we talk about technology, especially in the realm of what?
	In the realm of medicine, how much has it helped us?
	Again, it's helped the very, very wealthy.
	It's helped the predator class a lot.
	It's helped the powerful.
	But what has it done for the regular folk?
	From Gregano Sukova, one of our faculty, professor at Harvard Medical School.
	AI comes with large energy resource demands and rare mineral material needs to build the hardware.
	How do you see these international global tensions, especially the interaction of pervasive AI and the climate?
	I mean, where's the real question in there?
	He just talked about the precious minerals.
	Why didn't he talk about the slave labor?
	Remember, his book has Danielle becoming the head of the CCP and the president of the United States in some contrived nonsense.
	And, you know, the Libya thing, not acknowledging the slavery there.
	This should be interesting.
	I mean, computers don't use that much energy.
	In fact, that's the least of our energy needs.
	And that's a whole other issue we didn't get into.
	See, it's funny.
	He sits there and he tells you the computers don't take that much energy.
	Now, what about supercomputers?
	What about quantum computers?
	What about like the D-Wave machines?
	What about the classified stuff?
	But then on the other hand, and I'm not defending the musker nuts, remember, they'll flip it on you and they'll say that Bitcoin, because of its mining operations and computational data, is using a ton of energy to create those coins.
	You see?
	It's like they hit you from both sides constantly.
	The creation of renewable energy sources is on an exponential.
	I have a very good chart that shows all of the renewable energies, and it's on an exponential.
	And if you follow that out, we'll be able to provide all of our energy needs on a renewable basis in 10 years.
	And at that point, we'll be using one part out of 5,000 parts of the sunlight that hits the earth.
	So we have plenty of headroom in that.
	So we'll actually be able to deal with climate change through renewable sources.
	Now, listen to that.
	Kurzweil is one of the few, again, I told you, he's one of the few people that doesn't fearmonger about carbon.
	And he states that the technology is right around the corner where we'll have unlimited energy basically through our harnessing of solar power.
	You don't hear that from anybody else, from anybody else.
	And I think that this is kind of like the soft, everything's okay.
	Don't worry about it.
	Push for AI and transhumanism.
	We're not going to do all the bad stuff.
	Right?
	But then you don't hear any of this stuff at the World Economic Forum.
	No.
	And you see everything going forward for a track, trace, database society.
	But again, you need that to get under the skin.
	You know, it's almost like a good cop, bad cop thing.
	But in terms of what we're using, computers are not that expensive.
	Again, what about the moral issues of the lithium?
	Just not even brought up.
	From Tim Miller.
	Will the singularity lead to a decrease in class conflict?
	Much of the gain in productivity and wealth in the last 50 years has been concentrated in the 1% as inflation adjusted.
	Not the 1%.
	It's not one out of 99 people.
	It's not the kid in your class whose dad had a car dealership.
	It's like the 0.001%.
	Get with it.
	Earnings in the working class have stagnated.
	Are you concerned about gains in productivity due to AI being unevenly distributed?
	And Don Goldman similarly comes in with this related question about inequities that, for example, we saw exacerbated during the COVID pandemic.
	I mean, my observation is that more and more people from more and more backgrounds are participating, which didn't used to.
	Third world countries, like in Africa, South America, and so on, did not participate to the same extent whereas they are participating far more dramatically today.
	Countries that were really under the weather in terms of being able to participate in these types of advances are now participating to very smart, very large.
	You know, so he's not answering the question at all.
	I mean, he's got his own lines.
	Well, you've got third world nations participating.
	This is going to, he's always selling you on it.
	It's the betterment of humanity.
	It's making everything better, better, better.
	I'm Ray Kurzweil.
	It's better.
	Get my book, Danielle.
	Let us indoctrinate your children.
	Let nanobots ooze into your biological self so you're not human anymore.
	It's great.
	It's a great, great idea.
	Good extent.
	So, I mean, anyway, that's my view on it.
	I mean, Kurzweil is really bidening out.
	Has it been a long day here, Ray?
	Or again, are the signs of aging creeping up on you?
	It's a guy that would take handfuls of supplements all the time.
	And I'm not telling you not to do that.
	Bushnell's really sharp, and he's much older than Eray Kurzweil, I believe.
	And from Bill Acava, one of our faculty, a machine can easily beat the best human player at computer chess, but even a young child can move pieces on the physical board better than any general-purpose robot can.
	Do you imagine embodied machines will ever pass a physical Turing test in the real physical world?
	And if so, when?
	Yeah, we're making less progress with robotic machines, but that's also coming along.
	And it can also use the same type of machine learning.
	And we're going to see, I think, a tremendous amount of advances in robotics over the next 10 years.
	So that's the short one.
	And, you know, I mean, synthetic humans, biologic humans, like that kind of real doppelganger, the West World stuff, I think, is way off in the future.
	Let's hope.
	And that's why they want to hook you in, take your humanity away, and push a virtual nightmare on you and push this transhumanism and the merging with machines.
	And for a science fiction-y question from Ju Chang, how do you envision society once individual brains can interface with a cloud?
	Will individuality still exist?
	It seems you imagine human intelligence coalescing into a singular consciousness.
	Yes, definitely.
	I mean, that's one of the requirements of being able to connect to the cloud is that this is your portion of the cloud and other people can't access it.
	And we're actually doing very well on that.
	And all of our phones connect to the cloud, and we don't see people complaining that other people are getting access to it.
Cyber Consciousness and Souls 00:14:27
	Really?
	So like when everybody's phone was hacked via iOS back in the Fappening days and there were all those sex videos out, no one was complaining about that.
	Nobody?
	Bueller?
	No one's complaining about that?
	And people like myself don't turn on auto back or turn off auto backup and every other thing that they possibly can on the phone.
	Yeah, I'm concerned about it, Ray.
	And I'm certainly not going to hook my brain into some like hive mind.
	Okay.
	You know, there's a few more minutes left in this.
	I'm going to skip over that because I want to get to Martine Rothblatt, who gave the glowing review and again is a Kurzwellian disciple.
	And Kurzweil has written forwards in the book, Digitally Human, The Promise and Peril of Digital Immortality and what they're selling you on.
	Okay, so I've got a few clips here.
	And man, I might, I mean, it's, yeah, that one's three minutes long.
	Well, let's let's start with that one.
	Let's start with this one.
	Is also the recipient of this year's Billie Jean King Leadership Initiatives Award, which is devoted to LBGT issues and puts her in an interesting issue because she has a company, or part of the company, is based in North Carolina, which, as you know, right now, she might get arrested for going to the bathroom if the governor had anything to do about it.
	ladies and gentlemen martin ross black martin one of the basic concepts that you're interested in it's not just improving lives but it's actually immortality that we're all going to live forever And Martine, I might mention, has sounded a religion, as one does, known as terrorism.
	It's based on transhumanism.
	And you have the idea that we're not just going to live a long time, but we're all going to live forever.
	Tell us your concept of immortality and how that actually would work.
	So, again, when they're talking immortality, they're not really talking about you.
	They're not really talking about your humanity or your soul or your biology.
	They're planning on euthanizing all that.
	And this is what they're planning for.
	Thanks, Neely.
	It's a great pleasure to be here.
	The idea is one that has been percolating up from lots of people in the information technology industry for a while.
	Perhaps Ray Kurzweil, who is a prolific inventor, is best known for the idea that as our abilities in the information processing industry, computer software, storage of more and more of our thoughts and our ideas outside of our body becomes easier, more automatic, less expensive.
	That ultimately we're going to have sort of digital doppelgangers of ourselves that are stored in the cloud and are able to present themselves to any manner of devices.
	And that as thousands and thousands of software coders and hackers and people in the maker movement work to make the software that runs these digital doppelgangers ever more lifelike, ever more human-like, there'll come sort of a tipping point when people begin to claim that these digital doppelgangers have achieved what we call consciousness.
	The tipping point, the philosophy.
	No scientific evidence behind any of this.
	So again, they want to convince you on an artificial consciousness that is programmed and created by others in order to get you into a hive mind track trace database inside your biological system.
	Like that's, I mean, ability to have a sense of themselves, hopes, fears, and feelings.
	And at that point, I think the activity will move to the legal arena as to whether or not these digital doppelgangers really are conscious, really do have an independent legal identity.
	And kind of the trend of progressive thinking is once there's a scientific consensus, and in this case, it would be the science of psychology.
	So now, again, remember, Ray tells you it's a philosophical question and not about the science.
	This person is telling you is about the science, but we're going to allow the science of psychology, one that is betraying us again And again, again, again, and again with their SSRI drugs, and now this transgenderism movement that's being promoted by this person, the psychologists that say it's okay to chemically and physically castrate children.
	Let's bring it back to that.
	So, once we can get people, you know, to agree that they are conscious and the lawyers involved in the science of psychology, that's it.
	That's a wrap.
	And kind of the trend of progressive thinking is once there's a scientific consensus, and in this case, it would be the science of psychology, that being the science of the mind, that these digital doppelgangers are, in fact, cyber conscious, then they'll begin to acquire the sorts of rights and protections that we assign to even our pets,
	laboratory animals, and to quite a high extent to primates like chimpanzees.
	And so, in this way, ourselves will kind of morph into a sort of digital consciousness that is recognized by the law.
	So, there's a lot there.
	Okay, there's a whole lot there.
	When Martine Rothblatt talks about the idea we're going to assign this to our pets and rights, no, no, no.
	This is a replacement for us.
	That's another massaging of the idea.
	And when we say chimpanzees and primates, remember, these people aren't just social Darwinists.
	They're Darwinists in the idea that there is no God, there is no creator.
	We have become God and we came from chimps.
	So, if we're going to give these digital consciousnesses the rights of chimps, well, you might as well just give them all the same rights as us.
	That's the cell.
	Okay?
	And, you know, rightfully so, at least the interviewer here asks Rothblatt about what?
	About the eugenics aspect of it.
	And that's, and this is eugenics.
	And Rothblatt writes that it's eugenics in the book, what is it, Unzip Genes.
	And it's called the positive eugenics, it's called transgenics, according to this person behind me.
	And I think very quickly we'll get to a point where we say that that cyber conscious individual has a soul.
	It's Neely's soul.
	And even if, God forbid, Neely's body ends in a car accident or some other death and disability, Neely did not end.
	Neely's identity continues in this cyber conscious form.
	Let me ask you one more about sort of the frightening aspects of this, because there would be some people that none of us want to live forever.
	Hitler, for example.
	Nobody wants this guy to be able to upload, right?
	So where do you get into sort of eugenics was a real thing in this country?
	In other words, you know, 20 years, 80 years ago, we're going to.
	He's not wrong.
	Mike.
	Like this 2016, if you don't think eugenics is going on, 80s, 90s, it's still going on.
	You know, it just kind of undercover.
	To coal people to make the whole tribe better.
	You're a nice person to run this project, but how do we avoid sort of digital eugenics and cyber robots, cyber people?
	Where does that come in?
	Who gets to participate in the program?
	Yeah, Neely, I'm kind of, I have the point of view that this is not something, a realistic thing to really fear because all of this cyber consciousness and all of these robots that are being developed are being developed in an environment which even though it's a human-made environment, our socioeconomic system, it's still an environment much like the natural environment.
	It's just us humans are the selection factors.
	And so the laws of Darwinism still apply.
	Notice, again, brings up Darwinism.
	And we're going to just act like the people on the top are super benevolent and not Darwinists and not social Darwinists and not do as thou wilt, folks.
	Like that's imagination land to me.
	That's not real.
	And the so-called bad robot problem or the Hitler robot problem, there is going to be nobody that wants to buy a Hitler robot.
	If a Hitler robot emerges and begins to do bad things, the same thing is going to happen to the Hitler robot that happened to the real Hitler, which is the rest of society is going to rise up and quash it down.
	So we're going to get a global war in which minions of Hitler are then smuggled into the United States through a project paperclip and start essentially the Central Intelligence Agency and the space program?
	I don't know.
	That sounds kind of sketchy.
	No, we'll all rise up against the evil robots, just like we've all risen up against the evil tyrants of this world.
	What planet are we on?
	So there's no market really for an evil robot, evil software.
	Does that mean that evil robots and software will never exist?
	No, I don't think it means that because there's always mutations in the environment and there will be bad people and bad robots that emerge.
	But the vast majority of billions of people that comprise all the decision making in society through their economic powers and their political powers will quash down the bad people and the bad robots.
	And so I think it's a self-correcting problem because who's the baddies?
	What's really happening with AIs?
	Who's really getting quashed down?
	Huh?
	I mean, are they pushing blockchain people or not?
	In fact, I'm going to put that one to play right after the end of this, which is 10 seconds longer.
	Humans, overwhelmingly good humans, comprise the Darwinian environment in which all of this cyber consciousness will emerge.
	They love that Darwin stuff.
	Hey, it's the refugee camp that runs on the blockchain.
	Yep, supermarkets, no physical money.
	They look right into the camera.
	Hey, it's not an orb, but they look right into the camera.
	Everything's okay.
	And then that connects them to their World Food Program account through biometrics.
	Now that refugees can find work and they can live in their little tents and slave camps.
	Isn't this great?
	You know, all your paperwork, like passports, exam certificates, financial histories, your biology.
	And, you know, when conflicts destroy your region, just come on over.
	Just come on over.
	We got the blockchain slavery form.
	Yeah, but just pay, you know, directly to the refugees.
	And, you know, we're just going to take those payments out of the dollars in the bank.
	Blockchain cuts the fees by 98%.
	There's no need for a bank account or cash.
	It's just totally you.
	And funds can be dedicated right to your whole food program account.
	Isn't this great?
	Yay, blockchain, yay, UBI, yay, Sam Altman, WorldCoin, orb.
	And eventually, you can just be this asshole.
	Have what the humans don't have.
	So we are in a stage in history that we can actually design what species we want to be.
	I consider myself a trans species because I'm adding senses and organs that other species have.
	And you can add many, many more senses that other species have and organs that other species have.
	And we'll start seeing this in the 20s because it's now growing.
	It's happening on the ground.
	There's already many surgeons that are willing to do the surgery anonymously in the same way that in the 50s and 60s, transgender operations were being done a bit underground.
	Now, cyborg surgeries are being done a bit underground.
	But in the end, bioethical committees will also accept that cyborg surgeries should be allowed for everyone that wants to extend their perception of reality at least to the level of.
	There you go.
	There you go.
	But there's no transgender, transhuman connection.
	Folks, I am a documentary filmmaker.
	Loose Change Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, a New World Order to Find.
	And Shade the Motion Picture are free on all of the platforms out there.
	That's every single darn one.
	I want to thank all the people that have come over to redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored and signed up.
	Remember, try it out for a buck for the first week.
	$10 dues, that's 10 bucks.
	You get 10 bucks for a month or $100 for the year.
	That's how you help support the broadcast.
	You also help support the broadcast by sending people links to these documentary films, sending people links to the RVM Rumble channels and My Rumble channels and, you know, my Twitter, etc.
	I have people asking me if I'm still posting.
	I do like three hours a day most of the week.
	Am I still posting?
	Yeah, I'm still posting.
	I'm still out there.
	It's tough with the social media algorithms because they are absolutely 100% on the censor train.
	I want to say once again, guys, I love you.
	It is not about left or right.
	It is always about right and wrong.
	And I can't change the scene.

Chapters

00:00:03 Machinery That Gives Abundance
00:03:37 Bizarre Predictions And Views
00:14:34 Infinite Possibilities
00:17:25 Infinite Variations
00:28:57 Heavy Metal's Orb of Evil
00:32:37 Non Carbon, Wrong Hands
00:44:52 Learn By Doing
00:47:31 Claire Joins the Communist Party
00:57:36 Ip Vanish: Chat & Answers
01:10:03 Beyond Human Capabilities
01:24:33 Increasing Technology Utilization
01:40:30 Cyber Consciousness and Souls