Chimeras Aliens And The Metaverse In The Unreality
Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Rumble www.rvmrumble.com or Rokfin FREEShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1 and get 2 EXCLUSIVE Interviews A Week!!!
https://redvoicemedia.com/Uncensored
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/TheInfoWarrior
RVM Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/RedVoiceMedia
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade #TruthOverTreason #BreakingNews #InfoWarrior #BreakingNews Show less
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery.
We need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat.
As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy.
I am the great and powerful island.
I'm a human being.
God damn it.
My life has been.
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature.
Don't give yourselves to brutes.
Men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder.
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men!
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
I love you.
with Jason Hermes.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Good morning, everybody.
Get ready.
Aliens, Chimeras, the metaverse.
Aliens, Chimeras, & the Metaverse00:13:57
Those are going to be the main topics of today because every time I go over to YouTube and I listen to YouTube more than I watch it, kind of in the background when I'm doing thumbnails.
And generally, it is tech stuff or gaming review stuff or physically modding, hacking stuff.
Not like the type of hacks that they want to...
Russia!
Not that type of stuff.
Like, how can I mod my Xbox?
That type of stuff in the background.
I find that stuff fun and soothing, and I like taking things apart and putting them back together again.
I know I'm a weirdo, but I've noticed, especially recently, that every time I go to YouTube, every single time, one, the algorithm constantly suggests the same videos I don't click on for sometimes weeks at a time that have millions of views that I have no interest in whatsoever.
But they have some like kind of a clickbait thumbnail.
Like there's one of this girl and she's telling you, you know, what's going on with you and flirting with girls.
And it's got like a little side boob action or inside breast thing.
So people click on it, right?
And then this other guy is pointing at something.
It's just absurd.
But the thing that I've been seeing recently, again and again and again, is a live stream.
And this is a big, like, you know, you're a sucker for it.
But they replay the recent UFO hearings kind of in a loop.
Or they start them and they put live on it.
And then they just restream them as if they're live.
So a bunch of people tune in for the first time because they want to be a part of it.
Whereas maybe they wouldn't have clicked otherwise.
And when I see how many people are watching these things, I think to myself, boy, oh boy, oh boy.
Sometimes I really do forget how piercing the UFO slash alien agenda narrative has been in our global society over the last, you know, probably century now, right?
I mean, as far as pop culture goes, I know we're talking World War II and it was normalized, but before that, I mean, space was the thing.
The radio shows were talking about it, right?
It was all about that stuff.
Buck Rogers.
And not only that, but it was incorporated with robots.
Just think about that for a second.
So I really thought to myself, what we're going to do today after we go over an initial story that I think is extremely important, especially in the post-truth world and the unreality we all live in, is we're going to play the opening statements of the three of these whistleblowers.
Okay.
And look, one of them seems to have actually two out of the three.
They seem to have at least first-hand eyewitness accounts of certain technologies.
Now, whether or not that technology is off-world or not, or not part of a classified program, I don't think any of these guys are high enough up the ladder to actually make that call.
But it's alien, alien, alien.
And the one guy is the dude that you like saw extremely emotional talking about how, you know, people have been killed for this.
And from what I saw, we're going to play one part where one of them gets questions.
It's all Johnny nonsense drivel drama.
There's no substance there other than to hype you up and get you ready for their disclosure.
And then that kind of brings me to the chimera aspect of this.
And I've constantly said this.
They could roll out physical entities that would be quote-unquote alien because we genetically engineer them and they will believe whatever is fed to them.
We've also had a mind control program.
So I'm going to play quite a few clips on hybrid species and chimeras because that's a reality also.
And I'm just not here to buy any of their bullshit.
They act like these things don't exist and they don't know how it's happening.
They're weapon systems.
And, you know, the obvious weapon that we've seen them utilize is psychological warfare against the friggin global populace.
Okay.
So that's that's and when we're also going to be subjugated to this virtual reality, okay, this digital metaverse, people are not going to be able, they're going to disassociate everything.
People already live in a dream state a lot of the time.
I hate to say it like that, but it's true.
They literally live in like a dream state where they're constantly either thinking about the personal relationships in their lives themselves, socially, and how they're going to get ahead on social media or project a certain image.
They're career-driven doing that.
And then they're thinking about the entertainment aspect of their life.
The TV shows they watch, the movies they want to watch, they can discuss with everybody.
Okay?
And even me, the sports.
And I'm not saying any of those things are necessarily bad.
You need a time off, but they're encompassed with it.
And one of the things people have been encompassed with and are fascinated by is this idea of aliens.
Okay.
So beginning in the next segment, we're going to start watching these guys and their opening testimony.
Okay.
Because listen, I'm not sure about the one guy.
I mean, all three of them might believe 100% of what they're saying.
You know, the emotional guy seems like a wreck, but they could also be conveying disinformation unwittingly.
They're well-meaning, they're a mark.
That technique has been used.
The whisper campaigns have been utilized since time began.
It's not even like an intelligence agency thing.
Useful disinformation through whisper campaigns has been around a very, very long time.
Point it out.
Okay, so quickly shifting gears in the unreality.
Had to go over this story.
Okay.
Project Veritas, who parted ways with James O'Keefe, put together this video.
We're not going to watch it.
I watched the whole thing yesterday.
Reason we're not going to watch it is you can watch it on your own.
It just already confirms everything that we've known since before the 2020 election.
I believe this story goes all the way back to, let's see, it says it right there.
0903.
So like September of 2020.
Okay, prior to the election.
So why is this story important?
Well, this is the Jill Biden, or I'm sorry, the Ashley Biden diary.
And it's weird that they have like their Veritas reporter looks a lot like Ashley Biden.
I don't know if they did that on purpose and they utilized her.
Who knows?
But I can tell you this.
We've known that that was real.
Veritas did not publish it.
And that's the problem with Veritas.
They get all this money and they become an organization and then they've got a board, right?
And that's why I like that O'Keefe does his own thing.
You know, he's a driven individual, love him, hate him, gets things done.
But at the same time, didn't put this out there.
They didn't put the diary out there.
You know, say what you want about other media organizations, but it was National File that had the cojones to put out what was a very scathing diary that they knew to be Ashley Biden's, 100%.
Veritas didn't want to be involved.
Okay.
Now, Veritas, at the same time, in that piece, why it's important is they get Ashley Biden on the phone to confirm that all of that stuff is hers.
There's more than that.
There's pills, there's suitcases.
And that's the other thing.
People don't get it.
Why would she write this thing, these things down?
It's a cry for help.
She wants to get caught, et cetera, et cetera.
Well, that's part of it, but you're also probably taking all sorts of psychotropic drugs.
So things are like spilling out all these things.
And she's writing them down.
You have to understand most of these mind control drugs, and that's what they are.
They're not helping you.
They were literally developed during that era with the pharmaceutical companies under MKUltra and the universities.
These SSRIs.
Like, get with it.
So she's writing all this stuff down.
And we've known about the inappropriate showers comment for how, again, since before the election, no mainstream media wanted to touch it, wanted to touch it at all.
Again, meanwhile, you got Sniffy McGee, and then let's go on top of that because we're in the post-truth world and we have been for a while.
I discussed it yesterday.
Hunter Biden's laptop is already in their possession amongst other hard drives, allegedly.
That's also reported.
Let's get that out of the way.
I think it's up to eight.
Now, whether that's true or not, I'm just saying what was in the press.
So, they've got all this information on him, which includes his contacts, which they already, you know, the central intelligence agency, all these people, they know what it is, especially like the Secret Service hanging out.
You don't think when his dad calls, they've peeked over and it comes up in his contacts as Pedo Peter.
That's not a big deal.
It's a huge deal.
So, to this day, even after yesterday's report, we'll see if they've updated it.
I don't think they have.
But in December 2022, Snopes has to do a fact check, fact check-ins.
This is December 7th, 2022.
I don't think it has been updated yet.
They just say, unproven.
It's from a dubious website.
They take things out of context, allegedly.
There's no way to verify.
We can't confirm it.
Just like they couldn't confirm the information on Hunter's laptop, all lies.
I mean, all this stuff was immediately confirmable.
Oh, who knows what Pat?
It's still up there.
Well, this one, we're undecided.
There's no provable evidence.
It can't.
I mean, it literally says it right under here: the sentence.
The alleged diary of the president's daughter has not been authenticated.
Well, we haven't given the go to tell you it's real.
That's the unreality.
And they're prepping.
I mean, they're not prepping us for it anymore.
They're barraging us with it to make you want to go into a virtual metaverse and embrace that and have your endorphins come from that.
That's the plan, Stan.
You get it?
Those are the facts, Jack.
As Joe Biden may have said when he was still a conscious human being.
And he's a bad guy.
He's a really bad guy.
He's a bad guy.
His son's a bad guy.
I know nothing about Ashley.
But if anything in that diary regarding those showers, okay, on top of other things that are alleged, okay, if any of that's true, what can you say?
Like, how did you think they would turn out?
I mean, think about this.
On top of everything Hunter's done, he also got with his brother's ex-wife on top of it.
And then there's all sorts of allegations regarding the niece.
I'm going to leave it right there.
Okay.
Not great.
Not great.
So I'm glad Project Veritas put this out.
All old information being reconfirmed.
Just like what's going on with Devin Archer and Hunter Sauce and all that stuff.
So when we come back, we're going to start getting into the aliens.
I know everybody wants aliens.
Aliens, UAPs, Johnny Nonsense, and more after a word from our sponsor.
Attention, Americans.
Breaking news.
Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
Don't be fooled.
It won't benefit you.
Take action now.
The Federal Reserve phase deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
Be prepared.
This may catch many off guard.
Your hard-earned assets are in jeopardy.
But there's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
Biden's Digital Dollar Scheme00:13:27
Reach out to American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar in volatile markets.
Visit protectfrombiden.com.
This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into precious metals without any tax consequences.
Be smart.
Don't let Biden force you into using the government's new digital dollar.
Visit protectfrombiden.com to get your free guide and get started.
Again, that's protect from biden.com.
All right, we are back.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
Remember, you can watch the second hour for free over at rvmrumble.com, rvmrumble.com.
I'm going to make a quick plea with you.
I've lost almost 300 subscribers, maybe more, in the past couple months over at YouTube.
Let people know about the YouTube.
We're trying to bring people in from the cat videos.
Obviously, not getting a lot of play.
The numbers are big time down, even though the likes aren't down.
The ratio of that stuff isn't down.
Just weird that it's suppressing there.
And I've lost probably about 100 followers over on Twitter recently.
Now, I paid for the blue check mark.
I put videos up.
It's weird.
I do more content.
And generally, when you do more content, especially when you achieve like the rating success that I do and the attention length, you gain people on social media.
It's not the case here.
So at Jason Burmese, this you can find me across any other platform as well.
And on top of that, RVMrumble.com for the second hour.
Redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
You want to support the broadcast?
Check out the latest and greatest interviews with Pat Militage, Allison Morrow, Terry Newsome, and more.
Please go do that.
It helps support the broadcast.
I want to thank those that signed up yesterday.
We had several.
Everybody counts, guys.
Everybody counts.
You get a few a day.
That's a big deal.
You know, I'm not Ben Shapiro.
I'm not talking Johnny.
Now, all these guys, by the way, mainline, are now just hookline and sinker on this UFO thing.
You know, that reminds me.
One thing before we go.
When I get something wrong, I admit it.
I should have just started the program with this.
And look, I hate being wrong.
It digs at me, but I'm a human being and I'm not going to get everything right.
And sometimes I'm not nosed to frickin' damas.
And this is a nice, humbling reminder that sometimes I'm wrong.
Annie Jacobson's new book will not be on transhumanism.
It is Nuclear War, a scenario.
I'm not sure how I feel about it.
But it is that this is what it's about.
I'm dumbfounded.
But again, I don't get everything right.
Still love Ms. Jacobson's work.
Looking forward to it.
Probably going to be highlighting.
I mean, let's hope this isn't some dark premonition because we have been talking a lot about nuclear war lately.
And that's another thing.
Nuclear fission reactors as power sources for military vehicles have been utilized now for decades publicly.
Nuclear submarines, you know, when Trump talks about how much like plutonium or uranium that they're utilizing to power a sub for you know years on end, that's old technology.
So once, if you don't think that's absolutely been utilized in secret aircraft, and when guys like Dennis Bush, know who we play here, have patents on these reactors.
Okay, if you don't think they're utilizing them on vehicles that are airborne, come on.
Now, whether or not they're able to produce them in mass, that's another question.
What materials they're made of, et cetera, et cetera.
They may not be able to.
It's just like with this very real nano sat revolution, technology has been there for a very long time.
It was through the mass production of cell phone chips that they were able to really put it into gear to begin commercializing it and getting it out into the public.
That's how they do it.
So I'm going to start with: I think David Grush is the emotional guy that came out and started people have been murdered.
Show me the money and show me the evidence of this extraterrestrial civilization.
And my fear is eventually that evidence will come in biological form, but the biological form will be something that we have created.
So here's Grush.
Mr. Chairman, ranking members and congressmen, thank you.
I'm happy to be here.
This is an important issue, and I'm grateful for your time.
My name is David Charles Grush.
I was an intelligence officer for 14 years both in the U.S. Air Force, both active duty, Air National Guard and Reserve, at the rank of major, and most recently from 2021 to 2025, or excuse me, 2023.
I mean, like I said, kind of a mess.
Seems a little manic.
That's all I'm saying.
Now, and there's Corbel, and there's George Knapp.
So Jeremy Corbel and George Knapp are there.
And look, I think Knapp's done some good work.
Again, I think that they're all falling for this alien thing, hook, line, and sinker, because they want to believe.
It's a magical belief.
And I'm not a disbeliever.
I want to make that extremely clear: that there's not a possibility.
I'm not saying we're the only thing out there.
Okay, I'm not saying that things might not be discovered, but the game they're playing is one of their narrative, command, control, utilize it as some kind of a military threat, and maybe even a global threat to consolidate power.
That's what I see.
And I'm sorry, this guy comes off as a huge chucklehead at the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, NGA, at the GS-15 civilian level, which is the military equivalent of a Fulbert Colonel.
I was my agency's co-lead in unidentified anomalous phenomena and transmedium object analysis, as well as reporting to the UAP Task Force, UAPTF, and eventually, once it was established, the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, Arrow.
I became a whistleblower through a PPD-19 urgent concern filing in May 2022 with the intelligence community inspector general.
Following concerning reports from multiple esteemed and credentialed current and former military and intelligence community individuals, that the U.S. government is operating with secrecy above congressional oversight with regards to UAPs.
My testimony is based on information I've been given by individuals with a long-standing track record of legitimacy and service to this country.
Stop it there.
Okay.
So none of his stuff is firsthand, period.
And that's the kind of whisper campaign.
This guy, in my opinion, unfortunately, is a dupe and a useful idiot.
And look, I don't know him personally.
Maybe he's a really smart guy.
But you know, I often talk about how people are extremely unimpressive today.
And look, everybody's not a public speaker.
Everybody's not a talk show host.
I get that.
This guy's reading off a piece of paper.
He sounds super manic.
I've seen the interview with him before.
He sounds super manic there.
Where's the first-hand knowledge of any of this?
Where's the technical knowledge?
Like, this guy's not somebody who's working with molecular biology or physics and propulsion systems, weapon systems in particular.
This guy doesn't have a real clearance.
You know, we're talking about Q, you know, and that johnny nonsense.
Well, Q clearance is real.
This guy doesn't have a Q clearance.
Come on.
And by the way, Q clearance is that the highest up at this point?
By the way, that's something Jacobson also writes about and talks about.
Who knows?
Who knows?
But, you know, we're a minute 30 in this guy's opening statement.
He's given you nothing.
He's given you nothing.
And that's what this whole thing was.
It's like we're doing something.
No, you're propping up a narrative.
I had the AOC clip I watched.
Just gross.
And they're all acting like these guys.
Oh boy, for coming forward.
There's going to be big repercussions.
Are you scared?
Ooh.
Ooh.
They want no whistleblowers on 9-11 coming forward.
Still waiting on that day.
Still waiting on that day.
Those people are still alive.
And it's not like some bullshit whisper campaign.
Just pointing that out.
Sorry.
We're going to keep going.
This is Reality Rants.
Thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
Many of whom also have shared compelling evidence in the form of photography, official documentation, and classified oral testimony to myself and many my various colleagues.
I have taken every step I can to corroborate this evidence over a period of four years while I was with the UAP Task Force and do my due diligence on the individual sharing it.
This is because of these steps I believe strongly in the importance of bringing this information before you.
I am driven by a commitment of both the truth and transparency, rooted in our inherent duty to uphold the United States Constitution and protect the American people.
I'm asking Congress to hold our government to the standard and thoroughly investigate these claims.
But as I stand here under oath now, I am speaking to the facts as I've been told them.
In the U.S. Air Force, in my National Reconnaissance Office, NRO, reservist capacity, I was a member of the UAP Task Force from 2019 to 2021.
I served at the NRO Operations Center on the director's briefing staff, which included the coordination of the Presidential Daily Brief and supporting a variety of contingency operations, which I was the reserve intelligence division chief back up.
In 2019, the UAP Task Force director asked me to identify all special access programs and controlled access programs, also known as SAPs and CAPS.
We needed to satisfy our congressionally mandated mission, and we were direct report at the time to the DEPSECDAF.
And that's where it gets tricky.
At the time, due to my extensive executive level, and by the way, and that's where it gets tricky, because they're not giving him any kind of real access to either one of those programs.
This guy's a reservist.
And that's not to knock reservists.
I'm just saying, this isn't even like a day-to-day military guy.
Does this guy, and he's part of the UAP task with Alizondo?
Come on.
Can we grow up a little bit?
What has this guy?
I've done my due diligence.
These people have served their country for a very long time.
First of all, I'm not saying there aren't good whistleblowers out there, but everybody can be compromised.
And when you're talking about the military-industrial complex and the intelligence community, forget about it.
Forget about it.
Like, those are the people that you want to have somewhat compromised.
Or those are the people that openly do it because they're part of psychological warfare programs, whisper campaigns.
Intelligence support duties.
I was cleared to literally all relevant compartments and in a position of extreme trust, both in my military and civilian capacities.
I was informed in the course of my official duties of a multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse engineering program, to which I was denied access to those additional read-ons when I requested it.
I made the decision based on the data I collected to report this information to my superiors and multiple inspectors general and in effect becoming a whistleblower.
As you know, I've suffered retaliation for my decision, but I am hopeful that my actions will ultimately lead to a positive outcome of increased transparency.
Thank you, and I'm happy to answer your questions.
And I mean, this is a long, and everybody's like so quick, and they're really acting like they're doing it big.
Becoming a Whistleblower00:02:34
Look, we're about to take another break.
I need you to thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
Remember, second hour uncensored over at RVMrumble.com.
When we come back, we've got David Fraver.
Ryan Graves is the other one that we're going to play.
We're only playing the opening statements because this is really where they're supposed to present the meat and potatoes of why they're there.
And again, even if you saw a picture or a video or even were up against a life form, unless that life form is something that you are even like qualified to be able to dissect or look at biologically and determine, you know, run tests on that.
It didn't originate here.
That's an issue for me.
It should be an issue for everybody.
And that's the chimeric aspect of this.
And things are only getting weirder, I promise you.
And in 2020, 2024 is around the corner.
All right.
Another word from our sponsor.
And then we will be on our way back playing more of these opening statements.
When I invented my pillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you.
And 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going.
Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever.
To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition My Pillow.
The Giza Elegance My Pillow is made with my patented adjustable film, the most amazing cotton and a two-inch pipe cusset.
It has four custom mop levels, machine washable and dryable, and you get my 60-day money-back guarantee and 10-year warranty.
Go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary MyPillow queen size.
Retails for $69.98, now only $19.98.
That's right, get a queen size My Pillow for only $19.98.
From all of us here at MyPillow, there he is, Mike Lindell, Koo Master.
You know, it's funny.
We're going to get to these videos in a second, but I have all these people in the comment section that come after me for the transhuman slash transgender issue that's easily documented.
Everything I document in just short videos is 100% reality, and it's a tax sauce.
Tic-Tac Shape Mystery00:15:19
So then on the other end of that, crazy, in my opinion, I tell everybody, if you watched yesterday, and they cut it up at RVM, thank you, RVM, that the White Hats are not in control, okay?
I mean, again, just what we opened up with, that story.
It should let you know no one's really going to jail.
No one's getting in trouble.
They know about these people.
They're compromised.
You know, there are good people in the FBI and the CIA at the lower levels.
But at the upper levels, it's pyramid down, top-down, command control, period.
And boy, do I get the white hats are in control.
And these other people that are just super delusional that are like part of a ghost in the machine.
You do the takedown quietly, carefully.
Are you being quiet and careful on social media?
No, you're not.
I'm not.
I'm loud.
We need more people to be loud.
That's not how you do it.
We're not part of spycraft, buddy.
Like, hate to tell you.
And by the way, we shouldn't be.
I get their methodologies of misinformation, disinformation, whisper campaigns.
But if you want to be 100% real and forget about just taking the gloves off, all that other, I hear, we're taking the gloves off.
You know how you take the gloves off from day one?
You tell the truth.
And then when you get things wrong, like I have today, right?
Like when we admit, got it wrong, you say, you know what?
I got it wrong.
And you move forward and try to be the best person you absolutely 100% can be.
That's the real power.
Call me kooky.
That's what I find empowering.
Lies don't make friends.
Okay, I get it.
There are gray areas, exceptions, etc.
Where has this gotten us when we talk about technology, warfare?
I mean, her book's about a possible nuclear war scenario that right now we've never been closer to, in my opinion.
And at least in my lifetime, in real time.
I'm not trying to fear monger, but I don't like the fact that drones are popping off in Moscow that are more than likely utilizing the startling systems that ourselves and the muskronauts put into place.
Dangerous times.
But this isn't about weaponizing space, right?
And getting a huge budget for that and introducing space force as their Artemis bullshit is about to go out.
I watched that NASA channel.
They're hyping it, boy.
Oh, the new crew, the first Artemis mission, they're not landing, by the way.
They're going around the moon.
That's what they're going to do.
Can't wait to see what they try to pull off there.
Who knows?
Maybe rocket technology gets to the moon because they've lied to us about how far away it is.
But I constantly hear about these Van Allen belts from NASA itself.
And no one else has seemed to master this rocket technology to go to the moon, except for us.
It just all seems extremely bizarre to me.
But, you know, it's not about, you know, actual DEWs, directed energy weapons in space.
It's not about killer satellites.
It's not about propulsion technology.
No, no.
Rods of God.
It's not about that stuff.
Or is it?
I mean, are we ever going to grow up?
No, we're going to talk about aliens.
Okay.
All right.
So let's go to Fraver.
He's next.
Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, Carsman, Congresswoman.
I want to first thank you for the invitation to speak to the committee on the UAP topic that has been in the news for the past six years and seems to be continuing to gain momentum.
As you know, my name is David Fraver.
I'm a retired commander in the United States Navy.
In 2004, I was a commanding officer of Strike Fighter Squadron 41, the world famous Black Aces.
We were attached to Carrier Air Wing 11 stationed on board the USS Nimitz and had begun a two-month workup cycle off the coast of California.
On this day, we were scheduled for a 2v2 air to air training with the USS Princeton as our control.
When we launched off Nuitz, my wingman was joining up.
We were told that the training was going to be suspended and we were going to proceed with real-world tasking.
As we proceeded to the west, the air controller was counting down the range to an object that we were going to, and we were unaware of what we were going to see when we arrived.
The controller told us that these objects had been observed for over two weeks, coming down from over 80,000 feet, rapidly descending to 20,000 feet, hanging out for hours, and then going straight back up.
For those who don't realize, above 80,000 feet is space.
See, I do realize that.
And so far, what I'm hearing is, all right, they're saying that.
That's very possible.
But how do we know this isn't classified testing?
You know, I'm just saying, and the Tic-Tac stuff, these videos have been out forever.
They made heroes of the New York Times that like literally are pumping out, Paul Krugman, Biden Ox.
It's the best.
Like the New York Times, this is it.
Goldilocks and the Biden Ox Bears.
And this is like literally a love letter to Joe Biden.
And I mean, it's hard to overstate how good the U.S. economics news has been lately.
This is not sarcastic.
This is what Krugman is like, literally saying Goldilocks.
It's a fairy tale.
But they're the heroes.
And look, this guy, you know, I do.
I believe his story.
Like, I don't think he's part of anything.
But again, nothing he saw, nothing he saw says alien to me.
Not a thing.
Whether he thinks that or not, because he's never experienced it, I get that.
Nothing.
We arrived at the location at approximately 20,000 feet in a controller called MergePlot, which means that our radar blip was now in the same resolution cell as the contact.
As we looked around, we noticed that we saw some whitewater off our right side.
It's important to note that the weather on this day was as close to perfect as you could ask for off the coast of San Diego.
Clear skies, light winds, calm seas, no white caps from waves.
So the whitewater stood out in a large blue ocean.
All four of us, because we were an F-18F, so we had pilots and Wizzo in the back seat, looked down a small, saw white tic-tac object with a longitudinal axis pointing north-south and moving very abruptly over the water like a ping-pong ball.
There were no rotors, no rotor wash, or any sign of visible control surfaces like wings.
As we started clockwise towards the object, my Wizzo and I decided to go down and take a closer look with the other aircraft staying in high cover to observe both us and the tic-tac.
We proceeded around the circle about 90 degrees from the start of our descent, and the object suddenly shifted its longitudinal axis, aligned it with my aircraft, and began to climb.
We continued down another 270 degrees, nose low, where the tic-tac, we consumed 270 degrees, and we went nose-low to where the tic-tac would have been.
Our altitude at this point was about 15,000 feet, and the tic-tac was about 12,000.
As we pulled nose onto the object within about a half mile of it, it rapidly accelerated in front of us and disappeared.
Our wingmen, roughly 8,000 feet above us, lost contact also.
We immediately turned back to see where the whitewater was at, and it was gone also.
So, as you started to turn back towards the east, the controller came up and said, Sir, you're not going to believe this, but that thing is at your cat point roughly 60 miles away in less than a minute.
You can calculate the speed.
We returned to Nimitz.
We were taking off our gear.
We were talking to one of my crews that was getting ready to launch.
We mentioned it to them, and they went out and luckily got the video that you see, that 90-second video.
What you don't see is the radar tape that was never released, and we don't know where it's at, of the active jamming that the object put on an APG-73 radar.
And I can get into modes later if you're.
So, again, this sounds every time you hear about this shutting off system, shutting off radar systems, doesn't that sound like a weapon system?
And yet, there's no attack.
They're not going actually against the military.
It's a test against their current military stuff.
It seems so obvious to me.
And I get it.
One minute, 60 miles, it doesn't seem possible.
But if you just look at quantum mechanics, like if that's some type of a UAV, and I'm not talking about the ones with the propellers and the copters, those you can utilize in numerous ways.
There was a recent Spider-Man movie, the one with Mysterio, right?
That actually showed you what a group of drones with holographic technology could mean.
And honestly, I think that that's more of a danger.
But then you would have other types of drones that maybe take advantage of quantum mechanics.
And you notice they talk about these things having no rotors, wingspans.
This is a tic-tac-shaped thing.
So, somehow, some way, you've got something that has a propulsion system, anti-gravity, and it can almost appear and reappear almost like the zeros and ones of a quantum computer and be both at the same time almost immediately.
Again, I'm not that smart, and I'm not in these special access programs.
But everything about this continually screams to me: we're testing our stuff against the old stuff and seeing how our military could react in real time.
Especially because our stuff could be their stuff in the idea that China, Russia, other first world nations, whether it be in Europe or Israel, possibly Saudi Arabia, India's got a pretty good program, eventually could get this technology because I believe a lot of it is several decades old.
Bare minimum, several decades old.
Let's continue.
Interested.
What is shocking to us is that the incident was never investigated.
None of my crew were ever questioned.
Tapes were never taken.
And after a couple days, it turned into a great story with friends.
It wasn't until 2009 until Jay Stratton had contacted me to investigate Unbeknownstal.
He was part of the ATIP program in the Pentagon led by Lou Elizondo.
And there was an unofficial official report that came out that's now on the internet.
Years later, I was contacted by the other pilot, Alex Dietrich, and asked if I'd been contacted.
And I said no, but I'm willing to talk.
I was contacted by Mr. Elizondo, and we talked for a short period of time, and he said we'd be in contact.
A few weeks after that, I was made aware that Lou had left the Pentagon in protest and joined forces with Tom DeLong, Chris Mellon, Steve Justice, and others to form Two Stars Academy, an organization that pressed the issue with leading industry experts and U.S. government officials.
They worked with Leslie Keene, who was present today, Rob Lumenthal, and Helene Cooper, to publish the articles in the New York Times 2017 New York Times.
And it removed the stigma on the topic of UFOs, which is why we're here today.
Again, this stigma that was there has been gone for a long time.
And through pop culture, I think we've been prepared by this.
I'd say one of the biggest things would obviously be the ancient aliens.
Those articles open the door for the government and public that cannot be closed.
It has led to an interest from our elected officials who are not focused on little green men, but figuring out where these craft are, where are they from, the technology they possess, how do they operate.
It also led to the Whistleblower Protection Act and the NDAA.
There are multiple witnesses coming forward to say that have first-hand knowledge, and Mr. Grush just covered that.
What concerns me is that there's no oversight from our elected officials on anything associated with our government processing or working on craft.
Believe not from this world.
This issue is not a full public disclosure that could undermine national security, but it is about ensuring that our system of checks and balances works across all work done in the government using taxpayer funds.
Yeah, because this is where they're concerned about the checks and balances.
We don't have checks and balances anymore in our voting systems.
We have proprietary software, machines, joke audits.
We have legalese.
All right, we have programs that are called Born Classified.
And then you have like literally them changing the language on, you know, UFOs, unidentified flying objects.
So now they're UAPs, unidentified aerial phenomena.
I mean, first of all, some of these things, I'm going to let them finish up.
We're going to go to a break.
We're going to come back.
It's going to be the last segment of the first hour.
RVMRumble.com is where you can see the second hour uncensored.
Relative to government programs, even unacknowledged WAVE programs have some level of oversight by the appropriate committee members in the House and Senate.
And this work that is said to be occurring from whistleblower testimonies should not be exempt.
In closing, I would like to say that the Tic Tac object we engaged in 2004 was far superior to anything that we had on time, have today, or are looking to develop in the next 10 years.
If we in fact have programs that possess this technology, it needs to have oversight from those people that the citizens of this great country elected in office to represent what is best for the United States and best for the citizens.
I thank you for your time.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
We interrupt today's programming to bring unfortunate news.
Biden's dangerous plan for a digital dollar is underway.
Don't be fooled.
It won't benefit you.
So take action now.
The Federal Reserve Space Deployment of FedNow began on July 1st, 2023.
Be prepared.
This may catch many off guard and put your hard-earned assets in jeopardy.
But here's the good news.
There's a simple legal tax loophole to opt out of the digital dollar.
Speak to someone at American Alternative Assets for a free wealth protection guide and discover how to safeguard your wealth with gold and silver IRAs against a failing dollar and volatile markets.
Call 833, the number two USA gold.
Yes, call back.
833-287-2465.
This invaluable guide provides precise steps to transfer your IRA or 401k into prices medals without any tax consequences.
Don't let right using the government's new digital dollar.
Call 833, the number two USA gold.
Yes, call now.
833-287-2465.
Swiftly, 833-287-2465.
God to Skull Technology00:03:12
We are back.
It's the final segment of the first hour.
It is Reality Rance.
I am Jason Burmes.
You know, this first hour, we haven't gotten much into the chimeras or the metaverse.
A lot of that's going to come in the second hour, unfortunately.
I got this TED Talk.
Actually, it's not a TED Talk.
Well, I do have a TED Talk.
So there's a TED Talk basically on the metaverse.
It's from this week.
It's brand new.
Most people haven't seen it.
And where this person thinks it's going, it's not going in a great place, by the way.
Uh, we have Business Insider that did a piece on the metaverse just recently.
Most people think the metaverse is dead, far from it.
Even if they rename it, rebrand it.
This is where everything's moving, this virtual world.
And then I have a conversation about hybrid humans from somebody who was working in tech, had a payment platform, sold it to PayPal.
You know, all these big companies they buy up.
All that's going to come up in the second hour.
We'll see how much we can get through.
It's how we work.
Digital humans, another avatar kind of a linking.
That we're going to show you a little bit of that as well.
Again, we'll see what we can get to in the second hour because we hit so many different things on this show.
And look, every once in a while, obviously, there's some overlap with what you're going to hear in either the mainstream or the alternative.
But we're really hammering home the agenda.
And right now, the agenda they're pushing is aliens are coming.
We're going to disclose the aliens.
Again, you know, I did this little thumbnail.
It's AI.
It's with prompts.
But out of everything that I got out of this one, I really liked the yellow Aztecian kind of alien.
I didn't put yellow or Aztecian.
It was like transhumanist, frog, alien.
I'm not even sure if I had robot in there, but came up with that thing.
And I'm like, yeah, they could totally roll something that looked like freaky like this out in like the Aztec garb.
And people would be like, I knew it, ancient aliens.
And then it could probably communicate with its mind, especially if we're all hived up.
And that's the other thing.
Mind communication, human-brain interfaces, they don't have to be internalized.
We've demonstrated that on the show, and yet they want them to be internalized.
Like God to skull technology is real.
What do you mean, God to skull?
In other words, people think that they're talking to God or an alien or whatever, communicating.
No, like there's literal tech where they can torture people with that.
Forget about a whisper campaign.
Hey, I know it sounds like science fiction.
Like, let's see if we can bring that up really quick.
We've got so much to go over.
God to skull tech.
The voice of God weapon returns.
Sightings And Speculations00:10:12
Wire.
That's 2007.
Like a device that projects voices into your head to make you think God is speaking to you.
But no, that's crazy.
You're crazy talk.
You know, we watched that clip from five, six years ago where the guy wears the headpiece and he just thinks about things and he can bring up the prompts from the question he was asked.
But no, voice, you know, voice of God, the voice of God weapon returns.
2007.
It's almost, I mean, that's 16 years ago.
Almost.
16 years ago that article getting written.
Just popping it in there.
All right.
Let's get to Ryan Graves and his opening statement.
And then we are going to play.
Oh man, I do have one more clip from this thing, but it's such not, it's like cartoonish.
The guy starts talking about his anniversary.
It's like, and being a boomer, being called a boomer by his daughter and all these other things.
I mean, it's a big fun game to these people.
Thank you.
Chairman Groffman, Ranking Member Garcia, distinguished members of the House Oversight Subcommittee on National Security, Representatives Burchett and Luna.
My name is Ryan Fobbs Graves, and I am a former F-18 pilot with a decade of service in the U.S. Navy, including two deployments in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Inherent Resolve.
I have experienced advanced UAP firsthand, and I'm here to voice the concerns of more than 30 commercial air crew and military veterans who have confided their similar encounters with me.
Today, I would like to highlight three critical issues that demand our action.
As we convene here, UAP are in our airspace, but they are grossly underreported.
These sightings are not rare or isolated.
They are routine.
Military air crew and commercial pilots, trained observers whose lives depend on accurate identification, are frequently witnessing these phenomenon.
How frequently?
And if it is frequent, wouldn't that lay more credence to the fact that not only are these things in beta test, but they're being utilized again in special access programs, and they have a purpose.
And the purpose isn't just to test themselves against our own military and current technologies.
Just a thought.
I mean, just a thought.
The stigma attached to UAP is real and powerful and challenges national security.
It silences commercial pilots who fear professional repercussions, discourages witnesses, and is only compounded by recent government claims questioning the credibility of eyewitness testimony.
Parts of our government are aware of more about UAP than they let on, but excessive classification practices keep crucial information hidden.
Since 2021, all UAP videos are classified as secret or above.
This level of secrecy not only impedes our understanding, but fuels speculation and mistrust.
In 2014, I was an F-18 Foxtrot pilot in the Navy Fighter Attack Squadron 11, the Red Rippers, and I was stationed at NAS Oceania in Virginia Beach.
After upgrades were made to our jet radar systems, we began detecting unknown objects operating in our airspace.
At first, we assumed they were radar errors, but soon we began to correlate the radar tracks with multiple onboard sensors, including infrared systems, eventually through visual ID.
During a training mission in Warning Area Whiskey 72, 10 miles off the coast of Virginia Beach, two F-18 Super Hornets were split by a UAP.
The object, described as a dark gray or a black cube inside of a clear sphere, came within 50 feet of the lead aircraft and was estimated to be 5 to 15 feet in diameter.
The mission commander terminated the flight immediately and returned to base.
So let's stop it here.
5 to 15 feet in diameter.
All right, so that's like, you know, my arm lengths out.
I can get like the five feet.
And then 15, maybe the room.
Maybe the room.
It's not huge.
I mean, it's not small.
But once again, and it's a cube inside a sphere.
Cube inside a sphere.
The question I'll have again is: is that some type of UAV that is also maybe projecting a holographic image?
Or is that some type of a UAV that is also acting as some type of an advanced satellite system?
I don't know.
It doesn't scream, quote-unquote, alien to me at all.
But and it's off the coast.
So many things are off the coast.
And then we'll also talk about things that are underwater, multi-purpose vehicles.
Oh, our military would never work on anything like that.
Our squadron submitted a safety report, but there was no official acknowledgement of the incident and no further mechanism to report the sightings.
Soon, these encounters became so frequent that aircrew would discuss the risk of UAP as part of their regular pre-flight briefs.
Recognizing the need for action and answers, I founded Americans for Safe Aerospace.
The organization has since become a haven for UAP witnesses who were previously unspoken due to the absence of a safe intake process.
More than 30 witnesses have come forward, and almost 5,000 Americans have joined us in the fight for transparency at safeaerospace.org.
The majority of witnesses are commercial pilots at major airlines.
Often, they are veterans with decades of flying experience.
Pilots are reporting UAP at altitudes that appear above them at 40,000 feet, potentially in low Earth orbit or in the gray zone below the Karman line, making inexplainable maneuvers like right-hand turns and retrograde orbits or J-hooks.
What here is new?
Seriously, I've been studying this subject since I was literally a kid, like 10 years old when I saw the first pictures of UFOs.
And from NASA footage that's out there where you can clearly see these things take the right-hand turns or stop on a dime or cover an insurmountable amount of space in almost no time.
It's all been known.
It's all been discussed.
This is like repetition 101.
I'm hearing the same exact thing again and again and again.
So, again, this also speaks to nothing new.
Just like we talked about with the none of this is new.
This is like pre-programming.
Let's get the thumbs up by not even 100 thumbs up through the first hour, guys.
We're almost done with the first hour.
You're going to have to come over to RVMrumble.com for that second hour.
Gonna want to do it.
Sometimes these reports are reoccurring with numerous recent sightings north of Hawaii and in the North Atlantic.
Other veterans are also coming forward to us regarding UAP encounters in our airspace and oceans.
The most compelling involve observations of UAP by multiple witnesses and sensor systems.
I believe these accounts are only scratching the surface, and more will share their experiences once it is safe to do so.
You know who's also on the floor of parts of the ocean openly?
That would be NASA.
Just point that out.
NASA with a bunch of black programs and special access programs and joint programs with our national security apparatus.
That NASA.
In closing, I recognize the skepticism surrounding this topic.
If everyone could see the sensor and video data I witnessed, our national conversation would change.
I urge us to put aside stigma and address the security and safety issue this topic represents.
If UAP are foreign drones, it is an urgent national security problem.
If it is something else, it is an issue for science.
In either case, unidentified objects are a concern for flight safety.
The American people deserve to know what is happening in our skies.
It is long overdue.
You know, at least this guy didn't go full alien, right?
That's probably, and the other guy really didn't either.
But yeah, he obviously alludes to it.
He just can't imagine it.
I like the guy talking about the possibility of foreign drones.
So to me, that's really where we're at, right?
So we're about to take one last break.
We're going to come back over to RVMrumble.com, second hour.
You want to support the broadcast?
Redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
That's redvoicemedia.com/slash uncensored.
And those are fun interviews that I get to do because you have kind of like an hour-long open conversation.
You're not sure what the direction is going to be.
You kind of have questions, etc., but you learn so much.
Those are the type of conversations I like to have.
Again, and again, when we get things wrong, we admit it.
And other people are much smarter than me.
So I love other opinions.
One commercial will come back for a second over to YouTube before we move it on over to RVMRumble.com.
Until then, if you're going to use a VPN, IP Vanish is probably going to be a good idea.
We love the internet, but the internet is tracking everything you do.
Take control of your online privacy with IP Vanish.
People with malicious intent are everywhere watching you.
Criminals can hack your Wi-Fi while broadband providers and advertisers monitor your data.
With IP Vanish on your device, your internet activity is encrypted.
No one can see what you're doing.
Your location, your connection, completely hidden.
Protect your internet privacy today with IP Vanish.
All right.
If you want to talk hybrid humans, chimeras, the metaverse, you're going to have to come on over to RVMrumble.com.
If not, thumbs it up, subscribe, share.
YouTube, you know, I can't quit you.
I kind of still love you for all that you were in the don't-be-evil days.
But come on over to the other platforms because that's the way it's got to be later, YouTube.
All right.
Let's do it.
Hybrid Humans: RVMrumble Edition00:15:32
Let's start talking hybrid humans.
We're going to skip the UAP witness stuff.
I think you get the gist of what I'm saying over there.
Instead, and again, like these are like the tech bro programs, xenotransplantation programs that's utilizing, for instance, Martine Rothblatt very much into xeno transplantation, has FDA approval growing human organs in animals.
Okay, pigs specifically.
But that's not necessarily what this is going to be about.
Okay, I just want to let everybody know.
But hybrid humans, that's also a real, man.
Do I have the one?
I thought I had the one where they talk about, I think, monkey DNA.
Let's see, digital humans.
No, not the digital humans.
Tell me I didn't bring that one over.
Hold on.
Hold on.
I thought I got that one.
Maybe I didn't bring it over.
Digital humans.
I guess I didn't grab that one.
That's too bad because that is a big one.
And again, that's old news that they've been doing that sort of thing.
Man, I could have swore I downloaded that.
Maybe it failed.
Whatever.
Let's go to this.
So, last one of the day.
So you made a big career shift in the last couple years.
You went from running a patents company that you sold to PayPal, you know, and then you shifted gears completely and went into neuroscience and neurotechnology.
And your new company, which you invested $100 million into or into that plus an OS fund last year, you describe it as a way to read and write neural code, right?
So what do you mean by that?
Maybe the best way to explain this is the comparison to genetics.
Yeah.
Where we have gotten the cost of sequencing a genome to a reasonable cost of a few thousand dollars and we now have tools to edit the genome.
So we have this biological system and we can now sequence it.
We can read the genome and we can now write to it.
I want people to understand that this is also five years old.
This is pre-COVID 1984.
Obviously, a lot of this is old news, but I want to show you again how the tech sector merges.
And now, like, the idea of quote-unquote, I mean, you look at the hate and live shots, there's, you know, a very chimeric element to that because they're programming sequences of foreign DNA together.
And so over the past couple years, there's been 2,400 trials spin up in gene editing in humans and plants and all kinds of things.
So this explosion of question of, for example, what can you do in fertility or solving disease in humans or actually improving humans?
And so the tool set has enabled this expansion of imagination.
Notice you said fertility.
Now, again, what if you wanted negative fertility?
Less, oh, that.
No, everything's so benevolent.
It's the benevolent billionaires association.
If we could actually read and write our genetic code, what could we do?
And so the same thing is true for the brain.
If we could create tools to read and write our neural code and actually intervene in our cognitive evolution.
So we're now playing with disease, dysfunction, imagination, creativity, attention, focus, communication.
What kind of questions could we pose?
So was there a particular moment for you, like a paper that you read, a researcher that you talked to, that kind of crystallized this idea that BCI or brain computer interfaces were on the verge of commercialization or possible commercialization?
Again, BCIs.
Hybrid humans, when, not if.
Again, this is five years old.
Human brain interfaces, whether we like it or not, are going to be a massive push.
The question is, will you have people adopting it to the tune of like the orb?
And the second question is, will it get either rejected so harshly that they go to aerosolized nanobots?
I know that sounds like science fiction, but I mean, self-assembling nanobots are real.
Aerosolized formats, bio-nanotech, all real.
Or, I mean, that puts them at jeopardy, though.
I want to say that.
Generally, you would not see the predator class release something that they are not either immune from totally, or there is some kind of a simple treatment that they can utilize and suppress from the public.
AKA what happened over the last several years.
Right?
So they want people also, there's an element to this of acquiescing, accepting, and bending the knee to the agenda.
Okay, so lining up for the muskronuts human-brain interface.
No, it wasn't that I saw it from an opportunity of like, it's the right time to do this from a commercial perspective.
My observation was when I look at the world and I contemplate, for example, 2050, and I wonder, and I'm going to make some assumptions.
I'm going to assume that we all enjoy being here today, that being present in this conversation is fun, be this conference is a good time, and that if one of us got diagnosed with trauma illness, that would be undesirable.
If the world fell apart, we're in an anarchic state, that would be undesirable.
So assuming that we want some type of pleasant future in 2050 where we can play our games and develop technology and have these conversations, then the thing that occurred to me is the single highest value thing I could work on would be to build the tools to read and write our neural code so that humans can self-direct their cognitive evolution.
In other words, I view that the future is much different than the past, and the future is going to be very complex for two reasons.
One is the pace of change is increasing, which means that we as a society, our institutions, can handle a certain amount of change over a certain period of time.
And the quickness of change puts pressure on that system.
And we can only withstand so much before they collapse.
Same with us individually.
And so the future presents this complexity where will we be able to withstand the quickness of change?
And secondly, is we have an emergent complexity in society.
And so my singular question is, can we get to 2050 and survive?
Be happy and be relevant?
Survive, be happy, and be relevant.
Now, that's 27 years away now.
Again, this is five years old.
Many of you out there have children.
They won't even have reached middle age by then.
Survive.
Now, you look at all the push of humans are bad.
They're destroying the planet.
Carbon is the enemy.
The decimation of the middle class, the introduction of an artificial, quote-unquote, intelligence that is anything but and projects a great narrative, the embracing of digital video games on a pop culture level, the push for a metaverse, which is also a WEF push.
You see what's happening right now.
And as a species, I mean, is it even, you talk about relevant, is it even surviving if we take these devices?
Are we human anymore?
And he talks about the ability to cognitively direct ourselves.
No, Their directed evolution is aimed at ending our humanity and ending the vast majority of the species, unfortunately.
That's just the reality of the situation.
So I'm always extremely wary.
Can we survive by 20?
So in 27 years, the prediction is we could destroy the entire species?
What are we doing?
And to me, the singular thing we should focus on as a, I mean, we need to focus on a ton of things, but the thing that deserves the most attention is our brain because everything we are, everything we're all building, everything we aspire to become is a product of our brain.
And I observed the world and it was like this blind spot.
I looked at what entrepreneurs are working on this, what are investors funding, what's the government funding, and I saw an absence of velocity and capital to achieve the goals on the time scales I thought were relevant.
So I feel like we are at risk and we're behind in the game of what we need to be technically with ourselves.
So can you talk a little bit about the learning curve of shifting from finance to neuroscience?
I mean, since making this big kind of public commitment around a year ago, what kind of hypotheses have you proven or disproven in this field?
You know, we haven't talked about anything publicly.
We've been very quiet.
Yeah.
So can you talk about like what are the biggest obstacles that you see today in terms of getting brain science forward?
Yeah, if building kernel is not the hardest company in the world to build, it's probably pretty close because we know very little about the brain and everything around the brain is very complex.
But I will say that it's the most invigorating experience of my life because it's incredibly challenging, which I love.
But it's also a difficult game.
For example, if you look at the toolkits we have in neuroscience today, for example, like deep brain stimulators, there's 150,000 people who have brain implants today to treat Parkinson's disease, central tremor.
So five years ago, he's talking about 150,000 Alzheimer's patients with the brain chips.
Just saying.
And you got a couple hundred thousand in 2018, which is about five years ago, according to Dennis Bushnell.
This isn't even really discussed.
It takes roughly 10 to 15 years and $300 million to get to market.
That's a single iteration of a product.
And so the iteration cycles are slow.
You have like four existential risks you have to compound.
So it's incredibly hard for a startup to make the distance.
And so it's just not conducive for rapid iteration or an easy entry point.
So it's very, very challenging.
Is the vision of Kernel to treat Conditions or medical conditions initially, with like a very specific, you know, either device or treatment, or is it to expand, you know, just or augment normal human capabilities or cognitive capabilities?
We'd like, I would like to build tools for the brain that do the equivalent of what we have in genetics.
I'd like to build a toolkit that enables us to ask any question.
For example, like, could you and I do brain-to-brain communication?
Yeah.
Could you and I feel like we're one person?
You talk about like hive control.
First of all, let me go back to where you said everything comes from the brain.
I don't necessarily know that that's true.
You know, these people have never isolated consciousness, created consciousness, you know, from nothing, created life from nothing.
You know, they're working with genetic material already available.
Very skeptical.
I mean, a toolkit, a toolkit that involves you literally, you know, brain surgery, altering what it means to be human.
Even if it wasn't brain surgery and we got to, again, the ingestible or aerosolized, et cetera, version of these things, it's no bueno to me.
I want to be a human being.
Could I expand my imagination by a hundredfold?
Could I invent things that have never been done before?
Because I have this new way of processing information.
Could I have a perfect memory?
Could I delete memories?
Could I, and a thousand other questions?
One thing, I mean, one point of argument that you've made is that the current debate over artificial intelligence is as an existential threat is actually misguided and that we're allocating our financial resources and attention on this inappropriately and away from human intelligence or human resilience.
And can you elaborate a little bit on that?
Yeah, I think it's misprioritized.
And specifically, what I think is if the conversation around AI is people are saying, hey, there's this thing that is potentially a big threat to us because it may take us over and/or run away and otherwise prevent us from living the lives that we have contemplated for ourselves.
And my observation is it is certainly true that artificial intelligence is a potential threat and we should not minimize that whatsoever.
It has a range of possible outcomes.
But if we look at the history of the human race and how good we've been at predicting the future development of technology, we get an F.
We get a failing grade.
And if you look, for example, of the beginning of the printing press, of the internet, of computers, every major technology, you ask humans during that time and age what will be used for, we almost never got it right.
And so I'm not saying the current.
I don't know that that's true.
In the early days, like the earliest days of the internet, when it was just chats, it was people are going to use this to meet and get together.
And obviously that's where social media, dating apps put out there.
Then, you know, how can I make money on this?
We talked about it being a digital library, which for, you know, it still is, whether it has all the information and now the information is being curated.
Now it's being, you know, five years ago, not as bad, but now to set a great narrative and make things more difficult.
I would say that that's just not true.
Like in the beginning days of the internet, especially in recent times, in the past 20 plus years, I think that those predictions were pretty correct.
As far as like the consolidation aspect of it, yeah, that's a little different.
But, you know, Yahoo's still around from being like one of those first search engines.
So a lot of this stuff, I don't, you know, I think this guy's got it twisted.
Approximations are not correct.
What I'm saying is we need to bear in mind we have been awful at predicting the past.
With that said, I think the one thing that is clear is that humans do pose a threat to society.
And what's the evidence?
Like exhibit A, all of human history.
And so if we contemplate this question of like what things threaten us the most, and I again come back to the brain, it's the human brain which is causing the threats that we share among each other.
It is the human brain building AI.
And so to me, it goes as a stack order.
What things can we prioritize in our conversations, in our investment, in our exploration, to then have the greatest impact everywhere else?
Because whether you're building a synthetic biology or government or your personal relationship, it's a product of your cognition.
I'm curious, do you have a sense of the ratio of how much the private sector is investing in AI and machine learning relative to the field that you're in?
And by the way, notice you mentioned synthetic biology.
Idea is like an order of magnitude.
Real People in VR00:15:36
Yeah, so there's some data we captured internally, and these are approximations because the definitions aren't clear, but we spent roughly $21 billion last year in AI and roughly $21 billion in cosmetic surgery.
And so the difference between those two investments is the investment in AI produces a compounded return.
And the investment in cosmetic surgery is a depreciating asset.
And so what if we could make that $21 billion for our own cognition a compounded return?
And you also said part of the reason that you made the commitment last year was because there was effectively a blind spot in the private financing world where venture firms weren't making the commitment in this because the time horizons were too long or they didn't have the familiarity with the space.
So what do you see your role in this relative to say traditional sources of funding for research and university research?
Like where's your piece in this jigsaw puzzle?
In society we have social proof.
And so for example, I live on the tail end of social proof of listening to artists.
I go to Spotify or Pandora and listen to the artists that are presented to me usually.
I don't find these artists in the dive bars.
And so most of us in society live on the tail end of what we're told by others is important, we should pursue, we should care about.
And when I started kernel or started thinking about this, there was a total lack of social proof that evolving our cognition is something we should care about or talk about or invest in or explore.
And so for example, even when I go to an investor today, like 99% of investors, when I talk about neuroscience or why this would be relevant, they have no idea how to think about it.
They have no idea that they should care about it.
They don't know it should be cool.
They just don't know.
And so we lack an awareness as a society that working on the brain may yield gains in everything we're trying to do.
The big problem is, on top of all this, is they are going to test a lot.
I mean, just like the FDA said now with Neuralink, they're going to test this on the plebs where it gets really, really good.
That's going to be really an elitist type thing.
And I don't think that these people are actually going to take the devices.
They're going to take the ones that they can wear.
They're going to use the wearables.
I mean, that's just where I see these things going.
Are there any kind of ethical considerations or like design issues that you run into that are completely unique to BCI that you just wouldn't find in other forms of human-computer interaction?
And if so, what are those?
Yeah, I mean, if we're successful in building these tools to evolve our cognitive evolution, it's the biggest revolution in the history of the human race because we're basically evolving as a species.
And so the questions that emerge in ethics and morals are limitless.
And this is one of the first conversations, one of the first things that comes up whenever we talk about this is people will say, well, what are you going to do if people, are people going to misuse this?
Are they going to do harm?
Yes, they are.
Like people always misuse technology.
And so the fact that Facebook is weaponized, like, why are we surprised that's the case?
And so the question I think that's more relevant for us to ask is, is working on our cognitive evolution a question of luxury or is it one of necessity?
And so the necessity argument I make is I say the future is unique, is different than the past and that the pressures and the complexity coming our way, we may get overwhelmed and be insufficiently adaptable to survive in this future.
I mean, when we talk about the survivability of the future, these are people that are bringing automation.
These are people that are pushing an AI that's not AI.
These are people that are telling us meat is no good.
These are people that have already genetically engineered the food supply.
These are people that have literally poisoned the water.
These are people that are spraying chemicals into the air.
Yeah, people have misused technology.
You better believe it.
100%.
And that's why I don't want anything to do with your human brain interface.
Okay?
I'm going to move on.
I'm going to move on, move on, move on.
What I want to do is I want to play this clip about the metaverse.
Tell me I've got this one right.
I really hope so.
Yes, here it is.
This is brand new.
This is just an explanation of the metaverse, a push for the metaverse by Business Insider.
And again, I don't think these type of PR puff pieces are going anywhere.
The metaverse.
Let's talk about metaverse.
By now, you've probably heard of the metaverse.
From now on, we're going to be metaverse first, not Facebook first.
But even with all this hype.
And many are betting, big, that it could change the face of how we interact.
And we have to say, it's pretty amazing.
The metaverse might still be a little confusing.
What is the metaverse?
The metaverse is basically the successor state to today's mobile internet.
It's an internet that is going to be a lot more immersive, more social, possibly, a lot more engaging, more 3D.
So it's almost like the internet's going to be all around us in some ways, breaking away from our phones, our desks.
The metaverse is going to offer, at least in the way that we define it, let's say it's going to be Web 3.0.
It's going to be a world that's going to be more seamless.
It's going to give more opportunity for much better experiences, much more immersive experiences.
And to get there, there are a lot of different technologies involved.
You know, it is enabled by many different technologies.
So AI, obviously, which is really hot right now, is part of the future state of the internet.
AR and VR, 5G, 6G, cloud computing, edge computing.
There's an element of blockchain as well, possibly.
So yeah, it's kind of how we will experience the future state of the internet.
So that to me is- You notice that there's an element of blockchain as well possibly.
Not possibly.
That's part of the plan.
You know, they're selling you on this digital unreality.
All right.
This augmented reality.
And you better believe, again, all this stuff is a tool, but what are they going to use it?
To compartmentalize you, to degrade you, to what separate you further from our true humanity.
Is part of that beginning idea concept of how do we make the world more immersive?
I am proud to announce that starting today, our company is now meta.
Mark Zuckerberg made this announcement in late 2021, saying that his company is now going to be metaverse first, not Facebook first.
And other major brands and companies proceeded to join the metaverse party.
Fashion brands like Nike and Gucci created virtual experiences for customers to explore their history, products, and designs.
Walmart built a virtual world called Walmart Land, where people can play games, attend concerts, and buy virtual merchandise for its avatars.
I mean, you gotta love it.
They're pushing Walmart and Walmart land in this like Lego Johnny nonsense, you know, uninspired virtual universe.
But some people argue that the metaverse still has a long way to go.
You know, as much as I don't necessarily always like seeing those headlines that proclaim the death of the metaverse, I understand that it was overhyped.
It was just a lot.
I think it's important to kind of understand that, especially for the younger generations, for Gen Z, but more so Gen Alpha, whatever happens in these virtual spaces is still very real, right?
Just because it happens in Fortnite doesn't make it less real to them.
It's very real.
It's this continuum of the spaces they inhabit, which can be virtual and the physical world.
See how this goes?
I mean, they're admitting to you they're going after your children.
Generation Alpha.
Think about what they're calling their Generation Alpha.
Yikes.
Forget about Generation Z. They're by the wayside.
They're useful idiots.
When we get rid of them, we want more people immersed in the metaverse.
The friends, the relationships they make are real.
For a lot of us that are in this industry, it's also making sure that we explain to people, like, this is a long-term vision.
It's a long-term play.
We do have one more thing.
And there are some notable companies making long-term plays on the metaverse.
Apple unveiled in June 2023 its long-awaited Vision Pro, a mixed reality headset schedule.
And by the way, it doesn't see through those eyes that are projected from all the cameras on there.
This builds a digital avatar of you that you're going to communicate with via like a FaceTime.
It's going to be available in one year or so.
I believe, right?
Yeah, I think so.
I think they're saying in 2024, summer of 2024, it's $3,500.
It's still got a pack on it.
But, you know, this is supposedly the new comfortable VR AR headset.
And by the way, I'm going to show you like real-time avatar technology that's much older now.
Like it's very, very old.
And this stuff is now getting to the space of mobile devices, scheduled to be released in early 2024.
Tech website The Verge demoed it and called it the best possible version of a VR headset.
Also in 2023, BMW opened what it calls the world's first virtual factory, a digital twin of a factory that it can run simulations on before actually opening the real physical factory.
And this is the Omniverse technology by NVIDIA that we have talked about.
See, there it is right there.
In fact, you can see the little thing Omniverse in the corner.
So these are factories that are built from PDF schematics.
So now you don't even really even have to have CAD models.
The CAD models are made for you and then they run basically all these stress tests on them.
BMW did this using NVIDIA's Omniverse platform, which its CEO has compared to the metaverse.
Epic Games, the developers of the hugely popular Fortnite game, is also deeply invested in the metaverse after raising $2 billion to advance the company's vision to build the metaverse.
The Lego Group, which announced a metaverse partnership with Epic Games, is also bullish on the metaverse space.
Firstly, I don't think that Metaverse is going to be just one platform.
I think Metaverse, at least in my view, should be platform agnostic.
I think that's the benefit of it is the fact that it's going to actually be agnostic to a particular platform.
It's going to exist in different technologies and it should be interoperable.
And I think what's going to power it up is if people are able to move seamlessly through the experiences in the metaverse versus actually being silent into one particular platform.
So, whether it's on Roblox, Fortnite, NVIDIA's Omniverse, and through a Meta or Apple headset or something else entirely, there are a lot of different directions the metaverse could go.
And that's the point, as technology, the internet, and the way we use both of them evolves.
This is not going to go away.
The internet will continue to evolve.
Their hardware is going to continue to evolve beyond our phones.
You know, what about that post-smartphone future?
New wearables are going to potentially open up new ways of us to engage with the internet.
Those are all things that brands look at towards the horizon.
So, yeah, the long-term value is that things are moving fast, technology is converging, and a whole new generation that is going to change things is slowly, you know, growing up.
I mean, they're showing you like the Star Wars hologram technology, but even better.
And somehow it's going to interact.
I mean, I guess if you're wearing glasses, like remember when they tried to sell you on Google Glass, back then people were just too creeped out that someone's wearing a 24-7 camera that can stream to the internet on their face.
But would people be as creeped out today?
I don't know.
I mean, let's see how these launches go.
But like I said, the metaverse is going nowhere.
And there they are.
Everybody's doubling and tripling down.
Point that out.
So digital humans that look just like us.
This is much older.
I think that this is like, again, like five years old.
This is, I believe, Doug Robel.
And he's wearing a mocap suit.
Won't even need the mocap.
Like, that's how old the technology is.
And he's basically sitting there talking in the mocap suit, but you're seeing his digital twin, which looks a lot like him.
But honestly, with the deepfag technology today that's commercially available, this is like nothing.
Okay.
So this is a TED talk.
Yeah, Ted.
let's do it I'm not a real person.
I'm actually a copy of a real person.
Although, I feel like a real person.
It's kind of hard to explain.
Hold on.
I think I saw a real person.
There's one.
Let's bring him on stage.
What you see up there is a digital human.
I'm wearing an inertial motion capture suit that's figuring out what my body is doing.
And I've got a single camera here that's watching my face and feeding some machine learning software that's taking my expressions like and transferring it to that guy.
Real time, then one camera.
Now we have a multitude of cameras.
And instead of just like the mocap suit, you have VR Tech, which uses literal magnetic wave technology pressure to have touch sensation.
That can also, I mean, with all the cameras now, like with multiple cameras, they've gotcha.
But sensors all over the place.
We call him DigiDoug.
He's actually a 3D character that I'm controlling live in real time.
So I work in visual effects.
And in visual effects, one of the hardest things to do is to create believable digital humans that the audience accepts as real.
People are just really good at recognizing other people.
Go figure.
So that's okay.
We'd like a challenge.
Over the last 15 years, we've been putting humans and creatures into film that you accept as real.
If they're happy, you should feel happy.
And if they feel pain, you should empathize with them.
We're getting pretty good at it, too.
But it's really, really difficult.
Effects like these take thousands of hours and hundreds of really talented artists.
But things have changed.
Over the last five years, computers and graphics cards have gotten seriously fast, right?
Yeah, seriously fast, super fast.
That's what the Omniverse is.
Real-Time Deception Possible00:02:13
And incorporated, again, with large language learning models.
Like that's what most of this AI is.
When you're putting that type of data in, it's a workhorse.
And they're utilizing that for what?
Not just deep fake technology, but real-time avatar technology and what you have with these new beauty filters that you see that just totally and completely change your face.
And machine learning, deep learning has happened.
So we asked ourselves, do you suppose we could create a photorealistic human like we're doing for film, but where you're seeing the actual emotions and the details of the person who's controlling the digital human in real time?
In fact, that's our goal.
If you were having a conversation with DigiDoug one-on-one, is it real enough so that you could tell whether or not I was lying to you?
And again, older tech, stuff that's going to be rolled out commercially via this headset, and it gets you into the unreality, the post-truth world.
Because we're not far away if we're not already there where real-time deception via like the running man is not only possible, but probable.
People abuse technology.
Just like the gentleman before with the human-brain interface stuff was talking about, the BCI stuff, the brain-computer interface.
So that's kind of inherent.
I don't know.
Could you tell somebody was lying?
Sometimes people can't tell others are lying when it's the most obvious thing in the world.
Are we going to be able to enhance that?
Again, we're in the post-truth world.
I want to play a clip of Allison Morrow from the premium because that's how we support the broadcast here.
Washington's Property Rights Crisis00:09:37
And we're going to make the sausage in front of everybody.
Boom.
We're going to double click here so it goes full screen.
You can watch this whole thing over at redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
But here she is talking about Washington State.
For here, like everything's a little bit less money.
People are more understanding.
They're more willing to stand up.
And even on the other side, there's a lot of unhappy Illinois residents, especially when it comes to the new catch and release rule and them going after the Second Amendment.
I'm sure that may be the reason that you chose.
I mean, being in Washington State, you know, that's a pretty free place.
But Florida certainly got some really good press.
Not a very free place.
Tell us.
No.
Okay.
Well, the reason I was telling you about the whole DNR debacle is because when I was no longer employed in the state and it was like, okay, we can get, you know, we can get out of here.
And so we knew we wanted to get out.
And here are the reasons why.
Number one, at the time, yes, guns was probably an issue.
I mean, they're taking like Lynn.
I don't know if my husband's right there.
I can't remember exactly what it is.
Like, you can't buy lawn guns now anymore or like certain size magazines anymore.
And it's just Washington State is one of those places where, kind of like New York, if you defend yourself, you better be really articulate about why you made the decision you made.
No one's going to let you get away with, like, oh, well, he broke into my house.
That's not, that's not good enough in Washington.
You know what I mean?
It has to be like, he broke into my house.
He had a knife to my throat.
He told me 17 times he was going to kill me.
He was stomping on my face.
He also shot my foot off.
And then maybe you'll have a chance of it being self-defense.
I mean, it's just one of those places where property rights are going down the drain.
And that includes also, not to say kids are your property, but kind of like in that sense, I mean, the state thinks it also is the best option for parenting and it owns your kids too.
So the latest thing now is they've redefined child abuse basically as if you don't take your kid to gender-affirming care, you know, get them surgery if they want it, then the state, if the kid runs away or tells their teacher, you know, I want another place to live, I don't want to go home, then they can just confiscate your kid and they don't have to tell you where your kid is.
And then they can take your kid and do all the medical procedures and just send you the bill.
And that's it.
I mean, you totally have no parental rights.
I mean, I think we were really hoping to get closer to family anyway.
My parents are here in Florida.
I grew up here.
So a lot of my friends are here from childhood, still live here.
And we wanted a little bit more support system.
It helped that there's, I think, I don't know if Florida is going to eventually trend in that direction, but we're behind Washington state anyway on some of those trends I just mentioned, guns and parental rights.
And then also, yes, COVID was like a major thing.
However, when we lived on the eastern side of Washington, I was a reporter originally in Seattle.
So that was a very different experience living on the eastern side near Idaho.
Washington often has petitions going around to sign if you want to secede from the state if you live on the eastern side.
That happens like every year.
People want to try to turn eastern Washington into its own state so that they don't have to be grouped with the Seattle, Western Washington-based voting block.
But when you lived out in Eastern Washington, there were so few people who were willing to go along with the governor and Seattle that you almost felt like you were in Idaho.
But, you know, it just got to the point where like, you know, you weren't going to, it was going to get to the point where you couldn't just not comply anymore.
You know, not wearing a mask at Costco is one thing.
The state coming for your kid, that's totally different.
And there's not too much, I don't think it takes too much of a stretch of the imagination to see the time when if they can define child abuse this way now, what happens if you don't choose certain medical treatments for your kids?
What if you don't do the vaccines?
What if you don't do all the vaccines?
What if you don't do their particular vaccine?
You know, what else?
You know, my kids drink raw milk.
Is that going to be illegal?
Because, you know, I mean, I can't tell you how many times I had doctors want to read me the Riot Act over the fact that we give our kids raw milk.
So there's just all these things that I think if you're living in a state where property rights or the idea of an individual who has who has rights over their life, If that's being encroached upon, you may think, well, no, I'll just go to court or I'll shoot that guy if he tries to kill me or whatever.
It's like, no, you won't.
You know, you will lose.
And just because somebody is attacking you now, that doesn't even mean you have the right to kill them anymore.
Our judicial system is a total mess.
So you live in an area where that's the case.
Like, man, you cannot assume that your life is not going to be completely turned upside down.
I mean, you could just be like, you're not looking for any trouble.
You're not like me out on the internet talking about all this crazy stuff.
You're just doing your own thing.
You're driving down the road.
Somebody comes up and says, you know, this is not a scenario that would be too far stretched.
You're down in downtown Spokane or downtown Seattle and somebody puts a gun to your window and you shoot them.
I mean, do you, do you, is it too far a stretch of imagination to think that there would be like, you know, you would be in the media as like shooting somebody who didn't shoot you.
And, you know, what if it turns into a race thing?
And now all of a sudden you're going to jail for manslaughter, you know, even though why is that person out?
That person probably had been in jail 16 times and shouldn't even be out yet.
You know, I mean, so, but they don't care.
So anyway, it's just, it's just not a place for, it's not a place, it's not turning in the direction of being able to have any constitutional rights over your property, including your own children.
And it's just crazy.
Get the whole story on Red Voice Media Premium using the link below, completely uncensored and free.
Great interview with Allison Morrow.
Really enjoyed that one.
I hope you enjoy it too, especially if you are premium.
I want to hit some headlines here.
And then I want to hit some of this TED Talk warning about the metaverse because it's fresh.
But let's go over these.
We report on this now getting some national attention.
You know, I mentioned the fact that this thing had HIV, herpes, malaria.
This is some kind of illegal Chinese-run virus laboratory.
It did not have the licensing.
It's running in California.
You know, when they say China, I want to know the individuals too, because, you know, are we talking, who are we talking?
There's a lot of people in China.
It's just wild this was going on.
You wonder what else is going on in this country, where it's going on, and how prolific something like this might be.
Okay.
Alice Alyssa Farrah Griffin is branded a lying phony after calling her former boss, Donald Trump, a mob boss live on air.
So, you know, we'll just play it.
It's like a mob boss.
He's done this throughout his career.
Michael Cohen spoke into this.
He pays for people's legal bills to the tune of $200,000 to try to keep them loyal to him.
This is a guy who's like a property manager at Mar-a-Lago, a pretty low-level gentleman who spoke about how he's like, I don't know, he was my boss and he asked me to do it.
So I would encourage him, break, because you are facing federal prison.
But he's currently having his lawyer paid for by Trump, which I'll remind you, my friend Cassidy Hutchinson didn't feel like she could tell the truth when she had a Trump paid for attorney.
It was only when she was able to get her own that she's like, these are the questions you need to ask me.
I want to answer this.
I want to tell you.
It's textbook Donald Trump.
So look, I don't necessarily agree.
Donnie T doesn't run things kind of like a mob boss, right?
Like, again, he worked for the mafia in order to get Atlantic City run.
But just shows you how phony people are in the political sphere, right?
Like, you know, look, obviously, when we're talking about this classified documents case, I feel like he's being railroaded.
That's one.
We'll start there.
Secondly, I think that, excuse me, guys, up early, up early in the morning.
Secondly, the threats and legal bills have to be enormous for some like custodial guy or property manager over there.
And you know, they're gunning for him and trying to flip him.
So I'm not so sure that what Donnie D is doing isn't, obviously, it's in his own best interest, but it might be in the best interest of the guy that they're now trying to make a target as well.
Because how is he going to defend himself?
Let's be honest.
Is Tim Scott trying to hide a private jet use?
Republican 2024 hopeful has spent $280,000 of donor cash on air travel in just three months in funneled payments through two mysterious companies.
Regulating the Metaverse Lawfully00:09:31
No kidding.
Like, these guys are jokes.
This guy's a joke.
You know, they're all coming to Iowa.
That's Ankony right outside of Des Moines.
There is Kim Reynolds who says she's not endorsing anybody.
The Dersh claims Obama would only come to his 75th birthday party on Martha's Vineyard if he disinvited Geraldo Rivera.
Wow.
A group of scumbags getting together.
I can't believe it.
And the scumbags don't love each other.
You know, he told Charlie Kirk this on Monday.
Again, you know, I've got no love loss for Mr. Dershowitz, who walked off my other show after the first line that I said.
You know, I wasn't really looking forward.
I was kind of dreading interviewing him, really, because this is a guy that has done some things that I don't consider to be great.
We've talked about him here.
And I don't want to go off on a tangent, but I just thought I'd bring up this is the company he keeps and the petty company at that.
Scientists discover variant-proof antibodies that can neutralize every strain of COVID.
You don't say.
As virus rates tick up across U.S. amid late summer wave, the newly found E7 antibody works against even newest Omicron sub-variants.
Give me a break.
What is this?
The new sell on more terrible hate and live shots?
Ridiculous.
Ridiculous.
What do we got here?
San Francisco removes Elon Musk's giant new brightly lit X sign over permit violations.
So the horrific giant neon X sign that he put up has now been taken down because people were complaining and it didn't have the proper paperwork on it.
All of it's cartoonish and ridiculous to me.
You know, like I just, I don't know what else to say.
Entrepreneurs sold over 1 billion unregistered crypto and stole 12 million from investors to fund luxurious lifestyle SEC claims.
This guy goes by Richard Hart.
I have watched some of his videos.
I don't know that he's justly being gone after.
I don't even think he lives in the United States.
But boy, are they coming after him?
And look, he lives in Finland.
He might be running crypto scams.
I have no idea.
I just don't want to give the government any more money than they deserve.
And like I said, I've seen this guy.
And, you know, out of some of these quote-unquote influencers, he's much better than others.
All right.
I want to kick this off right now.
This is a woman.
I'm going to butcher her name.
But talking about the metaverse and the dangers of the metaverse.
And her name is Mariana Irasilova.
Scary topic and even worse conclusions.
So please consider if you are ready for that.
Because I will show you a world in which the law does not protect you.
Are you ready for that?
I mean, like, honestly, like, very, very awkward.
The whole thing, got the tattoos.
I've got this other CNN clip where they're talking about how it's not safe.
They want to regulate this just like they want to regulate cryptocurrency.
They want more laws, not less.
They want to tell you it's for your safety while giving them another access point into your real life.
Okay, let's go.
Please close your eyes.
Imagine that you are listening to my speech in a virtual world.
A virtual version of myself is talking to you.
You are also a virtual version of yourself.
The reality that surrounds you looks the same, but is the result of a computer code.
Amazing, isn't it?
Will you be surprised if I tell you that now it's not just a creation of your imagination?
We are on the beginning of a revolution that will enable us to live in two worlds.
The real one and the virtual one.
And the virtual world will be called the metaverse.
So, what?
Really trying to sell it.
What is the metaverse?
I mean, this is, again, the global sale.
Let's get a hip tattooed pretty woman out there.
Let's have her speak to an audience in English.
You know, English prevails in a lot of the world.
All right here.
It's the metaverse.
It is a virtual space that is very similar to our world.
So in the metaverse, it will be possible to live your normal life, but as an avatar of you.
To immerse yourself in the metaverse world, all you have to do is put on weary goggles and explore.
So in the metaverse, it will be possible to buy fruits, go to school, and go to work.
But also to commit crimes, violate obligations, personal rights, and copyrights.
Analyzing the metaverse from the legal perspective, I came to a key question.
Is the law ready for the metaverse?
I am a lawyer and a PhD law student.
I do an academic research on procedural law.
I am also an immigrant.
I moved from Ukraine to Poland.
Eight years ago, I learned Polish alphabet, literally crying.
It was too hot for me.
But I had a big motivation to become a lawyer in Poland.
So I was very afraid.
But I tried to get to the one of the best law schools in Poland.
And guess what?
I did it.
You did it!
And now I'm writing my PhD on law in Polish.
So I had to learn Polish to become a lawyer in Polish.
And then I realized that to become a lawyer in the metaverse, you don't have to learn any language.
Because we don't know neither what law should apply in the metaverse nor in what language.
And it doesn't matter that I can speak five languages and can say chest, trivit, drasfuy, hello, and even bonjour, because I don't know what law should apply in the metaverse in the world which can become an alternative to our world now.
I know.
You are probably thinking, okay, but how effects in the virtual world affect my real life?
I understand you.
Let me try to convince you.
I would like to give you some examples.
You are an artist and you have your art gallery in the metaverse.
And in this art gallery, there are your paintings which you sell for crypto cards.
And one day you realize that somebody is copying your paintings and selling them to.
Your copyrights have been violated.
I mean, that's already happening, right?
With the NFT stuff in the metaverse.
I mean, that's baby stuff to me.
You know, I guess that's examples right now that will give them ultimately more access to try to regulate, but it's all about regulation, regulation, regulation.
And it's all about victimhood.
Let's go to this.
We've got a couple minutes.
Let's go to the CNN clip right here on the metaverse and how it's not safe for women.
I put my headset on, I created my account, selected my avatar, and within about 30 seconds of being in the communal area, I had three male avatars come towards me and start verbally harassing me and sexually harassing me and then proceed to sexually assault my avatar.
Bill Walton On Stuttering00:02:12
I asked them to stop.
They refused to, and then a fourth avatar came to take photos.
In 2021, researcher Nina Patel published a blog post detailing her experience of sexual harassment in the metaverse.
Since then, she says she's received death threats and hateful messages.
Because it's kind of ludicrous, right?
Talk about no tough skin.
Like, these are cartoon level.
Like, we should be laughing.
It's like the teabagging on like Halo, when people would squat down and teabag or Call of Duty.
You know, it's disrespectful.
It's funny, man.
You know, I talked about the Bill Walton documentary the other day because of Patty Hearst.
But last night, I still haven't finished it.
There's still like a half an hour to go in the last one.
But last night, he was talking about the fact that when he was playing with the Celtics, he was asked about them picking on Bill Walton because of his horrible stutter.
And he had a, I mean, talk about somebody overcoming stuff.
I mean, he's, whether you'll love Bill Walton or hate him as a broadcaster, he is a broadcaster, right?
And he learned how to get over his stutter.
He worked at it.
There, they were all Larry Bird, Kevin McHale.
They were brutal to him.
And he just kind of like laughs.
He goes, I was picked on about my stutter my whole life.
He's like, yeah, but isn't that hurtful?
And Fairy's like, life's not fair all the time.
He's like, you know, as part of my life, I don't hold any resentment.
Like, I got to get over things.
You know, yeah, that's not something to hold on to.
You got to get past your victimhood to be great.
Not here.
Everybody, see, you dumb AB.
You dumb AB.
Yikes.
All right, folks.
We are wrapping it up rap tacular style.
I want to remind everybody: I am a documentary filmmaker, Loose Change, Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, and New World Order to find and shade the motion picture all free right here, right now across platforms.
Please check them out.
And remember to stick around.
Red Voice Media runs till 8:30 p.m.
I want to say I love you guys.
It's not about left or right, it's always about right and wrong.