Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 14, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas

01:55:08

The Half A Trillion Dollar Scam!!! | Reality Rants with Jason Bermas

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	You know, the air is unfit to breathe.
	Our food is unfit to eat.
	As if that's the way it's supposed to be.
	We know things are bad.
	Worse than bad. They're crazy.
	Silence! The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
	You've got to say, I'm a human being!
	Goddammit! My life has value!
	You haven't met all the primal forces of Reacher!
	Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
	Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men. Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
	Yeah, thank you, you're beautiful. I love you, yes. You're beautiful. Thank you.
	It's showtime!
	And now, reality hit with Jason Hermes.
	Hermits.
	And who loves you?
	And who do you love?
	Good morning, everybody.
	I am Jason Bermes. This is Reality Rants, and it is brought to you by redvoicemedia.com.
	Doing it live, 9 a.m.
	to 8.30 p.m.
	Monday through Thursday.
	A lot of great shows also over the weekend, and of course, the premium broadcast that you can get via redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.com.
	With interviews such as Ryan Christian of The Last American Vagabond, the Jackman Brothers, who we had just an awesome time with.
	If you haven't seen that one, that's also well worth your time.
	And coming up this week, we might have a really cool one.
	I don't want to jinx it.
	I'm not sure what this gentleman's schedule is.
	But let's let the cat out of the bag right now.
	This is one of the reasons I love doing this show.
	Absolutely love it.
	And... Again, I'm a little guy.
	I have a small reach compared to many, many others.
	But I think that my audience appreciates the fact that I'm a genuine person.
	And I am trying to get to the truth.
	It doesn't matter what side you're on.
	I don't think there are sides.
	I think there's good and evil at the end of the day.
	That's all I'm sure of in this world.
	Good and evil exist. I'm going to try to fight for good.
	And I'm still like the only person, at least that I know of in the alternative media, that's covering this new Lenin story, at least at length.
	And David Whelan, the gentleman who has now done this investigation and...
	It's coming out with this documentary.
	Saw it on Twitter. Hit me up on Twitter.
	Said thank you. Said he agreed with my perspective.
	We're going to get him on.
	And we'll probably do it premium style, guys.
	Because that way I can go in-depth for an hour.
	Maybe even more. Let's see.
	We'll play the clips here.
	For sure. You'll get little tastes.
	But those that support, we'll get it first.
	And then eventually, really, this information.
	It's as good today as it is tomorrow.
	And that's what we try to do.
	In those hour-long interviews is not just have a conversation of what's going on that week, but let's go larger perspective.
	Let's go historical perspective.
	Let's get into subject matter that you have to understand because it's true.
	If you don't understand history, the whole doom to repeat it, it's not just repetition.
	It gets worse sometimes.
	I mean, I don't know how much worse it can get than for the people around the World War I, World War II era where they were just stacking bodies.
	Stacking bodies in that conflict.
	I mean, brutal.
	I don't know how much worse it can be for, you know, the goat herders and the opium farmers over in the Middle East that that's all they know.
	They just start getting drone bombed out of nowhere.
	Probably not the best position to be in.
	But, you know, it's a continuation.
	It's a continuation. And so, having these conversations with people that are exposing how the mechanisms of these things work, how actual black operations work, how if somebody...
	You know, we throw that term around, influencer.
	Influencer. If somebody who...
	Is basically a cultural icon starts speaking out against the system.
	They become a problem.
	There's a lot of problems.
	And look, I'm not trying to deify Trump, but if you don't think he's a cultural icon at this point, I mean, he has been.
	He was before he was the president.
	Like him or hate him. Love him or kind of don't like him.
	Whatever. It doesn't matter. He's there.
	He's like Mickey Mouse. Unfortunately, Mickey Mouse, Disney, cultural icons, recognizable.
	Certain image that's portrayed in your head.
	With Trump, it's been character assassination.
	It's been, you know, false allegations of Russian collusion and Johnny Nodz.
	It's really going after him for some of his best qualities, in my opinion.
	For instance, when you're saying Russian collusion, the guy wasn't getting us into World War III, was he?
	Like, that's a good thing to collude with old poot-poot on.
	Hey, hey, pootie! Listen, Let's stay out of your business.
	Okay? You'll stay out of mine.
	We'll be cool. We're not going to get aggressive with NATO or anything.
	You know, what is the purpose of NATO? Let's see what we can do about this.
	I want to get along. Holy schnapple!
	Can't have that.
	Might disrupt arms sales.
	Might disrupt this whole plan for globalization or a New World Order grift-a-thon.
	And that's why we're leading with this story.
	That's why this is the opening rant.
	And hopefully today is going to be a little different.
	I know we go through a lot of clips.
	I've got one clip that's like 40 plus minutes.
	I only watched little bits of it.
	And every bit I watched, I was like, oh, we're going to have to play this.
	We're going to have to play this. We're going to have to play that.
	So I figure towards the second hour, we're going to just get to that one clip.
	We're actually going to hit news stories today.
	And this one is extremely important for a multitude of reasons for me.
	The great COVID-1984 grift.
	$420 billion lost with aid through fraud and waste.
	Staggering reports from the AP, by the way, reveals how billions of taxpayer cash from $4.2 trillion in bailout funds disappeared.
	Now, I just want to start here.
	I just want to start here. The big grift is the $4.2 trillion.
	The other 90% of this.
	Now I know my title is the half trillion dollar scam.
	Guys, scam-a-thon all the way through.
	I mean, even if you went by what's now considered authoritative mainstream narratives, we're not going to say a word anymore.
	A word about either V-word.
	How about that? We're not going to say either V-word.
	I mean, you could get a computer V-word.
	Or you could get a V-word here.
	We don't have to talk about that.
	The main point in this article really is to blame you for being an asshole.
	You're the asshole. You're the grifters.
	And absolve the actual amount of government corruption, control, and waste.
	All of it wasteful, obviously.
	So what do I mean by that?
	Well, when you scroll down, you find out that out of this $420 billion, $280 billion of it, is like...
	The people that just got too much money from the government, they got too much stimulus as they shut everything down.
	Look at the bad guys. Bad, bad, bad.
	It was them. You get it?
	And then the other $123 billion was just misspent.
	It's wasted. We didn't need this.
	We didn't need that.
	We didn't deploy this.
	You know, like ships in a harbor.
	Or convention centers.
	Convention centers that had big FEMA flip over coffins as the bets, by the way.
	Yeah. Uh-huh.
	They had that. They were ready to go!
	Ready to go. 123.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	No, no, no, no, no. And again, it's you.
	And here's the deal. That's why...
	But I want to get into the term grift, too.
	Because, boy, people have called me a grifty.
	Grifty McBurmis, he's a grifter.
	This person's a grifter. That person's a grifter.
	Unfortunately, the reason that we're actually in this situation as a society, you know, as the United States of not America anymore at all.
	At all. Not a constitutional republic.
	We're the United States of grifters.
	It's through the learned helplessness.
	It's through the victimhood.
	And I gotta tell you.
	Like, I get it.
	I'm not trying to challenge anybody.
	You paid into the system.
	Why not get it back?
	You're used to the paperwork.
	You're used to bending the knee to the government no matter what.
	You're frightened.
	You're in a heightened state.
	You got your family to worry about.
	All that. I get a lot of it.
	I do. But...
	Over time, right?
	Over time, we've enabled people to be on what?
	These social programs of control.
	Period. Period.
	When a decade plus ago, you had 40 plus percent of people in this country taking some type of government assistance from Whether it be welfare or Medicaid or a dozen of the other programs, you're in trouble.
	You're in big trouble because it's this.
	Give me, give me, give me, give me, give me.
	Now, I want to earn for myself.
	I want a way out of this.
	I want to become independent.
	That should be a marginal part of society.
	It's not. It's not.
	So you got a lot of people on that level just can't wait to grift.
	On this thing. And then you got the small businesses that also have to make a living.
	Period. And they're the ones blaming.
	And I don't...
	I'm not blaming them.
	I'm just saying that that's why we're where we're at.
	Because no one's able to point the finger at the big rift like when I'm at these board meetings in the county and this money that they're talking about is going over a 10-year period.
	A 10-year period!
	You understand what that means?
	I'm like, a 10-year period?
	This is a year and a half ago, by the way.
	You know, this is like on almost year two of the nightmare.
	That's the grift.
	That's the real grifty McGrift.
	And unfortunately, there are just so many grifters out there that are comfortable with it.
	They're just super comfortable with it.
	I have a child.
	I'm going to get this, this, this, and not report that.
	And look, the government are the biggest grifters in the world.
	I'm not saying that.
	But once they get you into that system, you think you're getting good health care?
	You're not. You're not.
	You're getting establishment, run-of-the-mill, by the numbers.
	We could give a rat's ass.
	You're a paycheck to us.
	When you're gone, someone else is coming in.
	Health care. Period.
	Period. And if you can't understand that, you're fooling yourself because it's easy.
	Oh, it's just easier to grift.
	And I'm going to be honest with you, with everybody here.
	The only time I've taken government money, okay, ever, was college because I graduated high school at 17.
	And despite me thinking I knew it all, and by the way, I think I was a pretty sharp kid.
	I don't think I've changed that much.
	But ignorant to the ways of the world, yeah.
	I had my license for like a year.
	You only know what you see, right?
	So I took out, you know, I got federal aid and all that other stuff from the government.
	That's it. But you get to me at 22 five years later, post 9-11, I want nothing to do with y'all.
	I wouldn't take anything from you at all.
	I just don't want it.
	I don't want to be involved in your programs.
	I don't want to assist your mass genocide or democide around the world.
	I don't want to be part of your psychological operations against the populace.
	I don't want to be a part of your collusion.
	To bring in a global order while guys like Fauci snicker at the rest of us for pointing out all these conflicts of interest and all these government documents.
	Zoonotic! Gotta be careful.
	I don't want to say any words here.
	Zoonotic! Yeah, okay.
	That's the grift, man.
	And... So many people are just comfortable with it.
	I want nothing to do with it. They're getting ready for the implosion.
	They've consolidated the resources.
	That's the reality.
	We're going to come back, talk more about this and more.
	It's Reality Rance.
	And now a word from our sponsor.
	You're still looking good.
	I'm still feeling good.
	You know, I've got all your MyPillow products.
	Mattress topper, bed sheets, MyPillows, towels, slippers, blankets, sleepwear...
	Whoa, whoa, Charles. Everyone now can get MyPillow products at huge discounts at MyPillow.com.
	That's right. Now's the time to go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
	Use your promo code to take advantage of our 3-in-1 sale.
	We're bringing you exciting new products, overstock specials, and closeout deals you won't find anywhere else.
	For example, when you buy one of our brand new MyPillow 2.0s, you get another one absolutely free.
	And with our overstock sale, you save 50% on our luxurious Giza Dream bed sheets.
	That's as low as $29.99 for the best sheets ever.
	And with our biggest closeout special, you get our all-season slippers for only $35.
	Or our sandals and slides for just $25.
	Quantities are limited, and once they're gone, they're gone.
	Boy, if that mustache doesn't wake you up in the morning, maybe it's because the pillow's putting you to sleep.
	Use the promo code RVM when you're over at the MyPillow store.
	Just to briefly wrap up the grift rant here.
	Again, this is the issue.
	They're about to take your resources away.
	Your savings away.
	Blow out the dollar on behalf of a digital agenda.
	CBDC, blockchain, whatever you want to call it.
	They want digital, track, trace, database, everything.
	And they also want that integrated into your biology.
	That's the reality.
	That's where we're going with this.
	And they want to blame you all the way.
	And honestly, they know, when I say they, I'm talking about a predator class with an agenda, with a bunch of NGOs that tell you it's an agenda.
	I'm going to get to this story in a second, but I want to just show this.
	I mean, this is the World Economic Forum's page.
	Do you see what's on the top?
	Like, when I talk about an agenda, they're not shy.
	These are the agenda articles on artificial intelligence and robotics.
	There's 1,665 articles on this.
	The power of AI and wildfire prediction and prevention.
	Children's ethical standards can help us build human-centric AI. I mean...
	But there's not an agenda!
	Jason, you're nuts.
	There's no agenda. It just says agenda.
	How dare you use their language?
	It's the wildest thing.
	Alright, let's go back to this barrage of stories here.
	Because I want to get through these stories.
	We don't do this enough. Hit each one of these up really quickly.
	Maybe even go to some of your comments over at the YouTube.
	I want you to thumbs it up, by the way.
	We don't even have a hundred thumbs up.
	Let's go with that. Thumbs it up.
	Subscribe, share. If you're watching this on Rumble, same exact thing.
	Let people know about the broadcast.
	We're live Monday through Thursday.
	We're doing it live. We're having a good time talking about some dark things.
	And we're trying as hard as we can to talk about, yes, the relevant issues of today, but integrate them into the bigger picture, right?
	Call of Duty faces a backlash from gamers for launching Crackdown on prominent streamers' content after he tweeted about mass brawl during Pride Vote at Los Angeles School.
	And what I read, all he wrote with this video, this brawl thing, and I hate having to focus on this issue.
	It sucks. But like, he said, leave the kids alone.
	That's it. Pretty sure.
	Leave the kids alone is okay.
	Nope, not anymore. Now you're going to lose money again.
	Call of Duty has cut ties with its prominent streamer after he tweeted criticism of a California school board's decision to recognize Pride Month.
	Nick Kolcheff, who plays under the handle FaZe Nickmerks and has 4 million YouTube subscribers, has a partnership with the Blockbuster game Canned after he tweeted, They should leave the children alone.
	That's the real issue.
	You see what he said? He said to leave kids alone.
	You're a bigot now when you say leave kids alone.
	No shit. And he's not the only one.
	I believe this guy, from what I understand, the reason that he has a partnership with them and a package deal is he's a military guy himself and you can get the packs on there.
	And now other people are saying, hey, take my pack off too.
	But this is the extent of you're not allowed to have an opinion anymore.
	And it's censorship everywhere.
	And it used to be able to be completely and totally controlled because there wasn't a moment-by-moment interaction with people hundreds, thousands of miles away of influence.
	There's that word again, influence.
	That can sway opinion outside of what the mainstream media tosses out.
	Like a bad potato salad.
	Like a rotten potato salad.
	I mean, that's where they're at, right?
	I mean, it's a stinky, rotten, I don't want to eat it, I'm going to vomit potato salad every day.
	Every network. Everyone.
	Sorry. America, 2023, the post-truth world.
	And they don't like that they no longer have control.
	Well, look.
	Unfortunately, people also like nice things.
	They like to drive nice cars.
	They like to have a nice home.
	They like to be able to eat the food they like.
	So when you hit them in the pocket and you do so in a public arena, you send a message to other people that like nice things and like to have nice things.
	And they say, geez, that contract's worth $30,000 this year.
	I only got to play the game once a week.
	And then I get royalties on top of when people buy the pack.
	It brings in another $15,000.
	That's some people's yearly income.
	A lot of people's yearly income in this country.
	And that's just part of what I'm...
	I want to keep that.
	Probably going to keep the whole pride thing to myself.
	And here's the...
	Oh, let me see if I... Yeah, we've got to bring that one up.
	And here's the deal.
	I just... We're in the dark cartoon, man.
	Biden's LGBT Pride Party guest goes topless in White House Garden.
	Transgender model bears breasts on South Lawn after posing for snaps with President and First Lady.
	The adults are back in the White House!
	Again, say what you want about Donnie T. And people have, and I have.
	But... Call me kooky.
	I was more into it when Donnie T was on the White House lawn with a baseball mitt and Bernie Williams and a bunch of kids tossing baseballs around.
	Hey! Remember when America was baseball and apple pie?
	How about that? I loved baseball as a kid.
	Great sport. Very team-orientated.
	Nine people on the field working together.
	That's just on defense.
	Lots of nuances.
	Coaches telling you signals, communication, athletics, discipline.
	Now, you want that for our kids?
	By the way, great sport for both genders.
	Very competitive on both genders.
	I know that my friends who were girls...
	They played softball.
	They enjoyed it. They played it at a pretty competitive level.
	Every once in a while, I'll look up at the screen when I'm having lunch with my buddies, and I'll see a little softball on there.
	Sure, it's not as, you know, you can't make tens of millions of dollars a year playing softball, but you get the drift.
	It teaches all those things.
	Good stuff! Good stuff on the lawn, Donnie T. But not anymore.
	The adults are in the White House now.
	They're back. And the adults are so back, you've got people going topless.
	Yes, exposing their fake breasts on someone who was born a biological male.
	The adults are back.
	They're back in action.
	I don't even want to scroll down and show it.
	Do I have to?
	I don't think I have to, right?
	I saw it in the headline when I clicked it.
	I don't have any desire to see it again.
	I mean, it's blurred, but like, what am I watching here?
	It's just cartoon level.
	Dark cartoon level.
	You've got a guy that doesn't run a damn thing.
	Now, one stinky thing...
	No big deal. We've got a huge flag in front of the White House now that recognizes zeros and ones, non-binary as a thing, because it's really, at the end of the day, not just about globalism and a new world order, but you know it. What's described as transgenics in this book right here.
	Transgenics. Transhumanism.
	And it's out in the open, baby.
	And when you take the step back and you think about it, you think about this dark cartoon, it's just pushing forward.
	And meanwhile, I know that we sit here, we talk about elections and voting ourselves out.
	There's still been no accountability.
	I had a conversation yesterday where people are talking like Donnie T if he does get in, and I don't know how he gets in.
	We haven't changed anything about our election system.
	At all. And we don't know what disasters await us for 2024.
	At all. I'll tell you what.
	Sure are downplaying this global conflict with poking the bear via Russia and Ukraine.
	That's that's a problem. I know I know here a lot about China China China China China China China China that
	cultural Thank you for watching.
	Push is here too.
	And I don't like that.
	But when I'm thinking about immediate and militarily, I'm thinking that conflict.
	And I'm not necessarily thinking it's even Russia that pulls the trigger.
	That's the other thing, man.
	You just don't even know.
	How could you know in the post-truth world anymore?
	How could you know?
	Seriously. We're so chock full of lies...
	I mean, obviously, the absurd from a distance, like, hey, Russia blew up a bridge that totally and completely decimates the military infrastructure they had.
	Hey, Russia blew up their pipeline that is part of their infrastructure.
	Yeah, that's absurd. But, like, when you get into the actual fog of war, where we're just sending military equipment everywhere, we got the Starlink systems, we got the drones, we have completely and totally propped that up.
	I mean, Russia could retaliate.
	They could do something.
	And if that happens, say, oh, I don't know...
	In October.
	Imagine that. October.
	Surprise. Hmm?
	I mean, that changes the game right there.
	And I don't know where we're going to be next October.
	Right? But, I'll tell you what.
	It's around the corner here.
	We're around the corner from a year out from election season.
	They got the zombie saying he's running again.
	That there's not going to be any debates.
	Thank God you have RFK Jr.
	interjecting some sanity into it.
	But, like, is he going to run independent?
	Because I don't see the Democratic Party under any circumstance.
	Under any circumstance.
	Lightning striketh anywhere.
	I don't see them giving him the nomination.
	If they wouldn't give Bernie Sanders...
	Bernie Sanders, the nomination.
	Somebody that clearly was establishment in the sense that if you look at his policies, they're very adaptive to collectivism.
	But they still feared the shake-up that it wouldn't include some of the Wall Street insiders or that it would disrupt Wall Street.
	So they only let him go so far.
	You think they're giving the nod to RFK Jr.?
	And I get so many people saying, Jason Burmus-Lutz is a very black pill.
	It's reality. Listen, I was as shocked as anyone in 2016 when Donnie T got through the system.
	I really was.
	Corrupt voting machines and all.
	I still believe he had way more votes.
	Way more votes in 2016 than they let on.
	This whole idea of half the country this and half the country that.
	There's just such a large section of the country that doesn't identify as a Republican or a Democrat.
	They don't care. They don't care.
	At all. They don't like either one like me.
	They realize that, I mean, even if they're so disassociated from the system, they realize the level of corruption is so large that why would you play that team baseball?
	But the ones that do, they're the ones that are amplified, right?
	They're the ones with 100,000 followers, a million followers, 10 million followers!
	That's where we're at.
	We're going to go to a commercial break.
	We're going to hit a few more stories up.
	I'm going to read through some of these comments over there.
	Maybe bring them up.
	I want you to thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
	Remember, redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	Sign up for a buck today and get two extra interviews every single week.
	Welcome to Reagan Gold Group.
	We're glad you're here.
	We understand that you're probably feeling the pain of rising inflation and are worried about how it may be affecting your hard-earned savings.
	Thanks to HR 5376 passed by President Biden, many 401k and IRA savers are facing a nightmare.
	Governments are printing fiat currency at an alarming rate, which means that the value of your savings is being eroded day by day.
	However, there is a way to escape wealth confiscation.
	Precious metals such as gold does not depreciate over time and is a sound investment that keeps on growing.
	Physical gold is not subject to fraud, and as inflation rises, so does the price of gold.
	It's an investment product that is renowned for its ability to hedge against inflation.
	I'm Leith Eaton, the Senior Account Executive here at Reagan Gold Group.
	We offer 100% free IRA rollovers with free storage, maintenance, and insurance for up to three years on qualified orders.
	We understand that your financial needs and goals may change over time, which is why we offer a hassle-free buyback commitment.
	This allows you to sell your precious metals any day, any time, at the current market value.
	Whether you're looking to cash in on your investment, diversify your portfolio, or simply need some extra cash, Our buyback commitment is here to support you.
	We offer a price match guarantee to ensure you get the best price for your precious metal investments.
	Contact us before making a purchase and we'll beat any competitor's price.
	We also understand the importance of the safe and secure shipping of your metals.
	That's why we fully ensure all orders shipped to our customers with signature required.
	Book a free consultation with us now to learn how you can invest in precious metals and hedge your financial future.
	And for a limited time, we're offering up to $2,500 in free gold and silver.
	Don't miss out on this limited opportunity.
	Contact us today to take advantage of this amazing offer.
	rvmgold.com Go check it out for all your gold needs.
	I want to thank Christina for that tipski and hutch over at The Rockfin.
	I want to hit some more of these stories up right here.
	All up in here.
	Where do we got right here?
	Disney Heiress says her grandfather is spitting in his grave as video emerges of Nazi flags being waved outside Orlando Park.
	Now, I saw this. You know, these ignorant-ass people or feds or a combination of ignorant-ass people and feds.
	You know, when I see the people with their faces covered or whatever, you know, a bunch of Nazis are now outside of Disney.
	Huh. Huh. So, like, people have legitimate concerns about Disney sexualizing children, being completely inappropriate, not having any government regulation in Florida, and now all of a sudden Nazis are protesting Disney.
	It's just odd. It's just odd how that works, right?
	Just a little. Anyone else find that just, like, a bit weird?
	It's weird. I'm sure that I'm being conspiratorial and thinking that there's anything to that, right?
	I must be. Because obviously that's real.
	And that if you're protesting Disney and some of the things that they do, you're probably a Nazi now.
	Oh boy. The dark cartoon continues.
	This is another big story.
	They're paying out J.P. Morgan agrees to pay Epstein victims $290 million in historic class action lawsuit settlement.
	After it was revealed, the bank continued to do business with him for years despite labeling him a high-risk client linked to the bank from 1998 to 2013.
	Wow. So if you look at this right here, Another big one.
	They had $70 million. This is $290 million.
	Alright? The lawsuit was filed on behalf of one woman, but the settlement rewards anyone who was victimized by Epstein, a known pedophile who killed himself in prison in 2019.
	The number of victims who may stand to gain from the settlement could reach a
	hundred, though it's unclear if there is a limit on the number who can come
	forward or whether each is limited in how much they can receive. The parties
	believe this settlement is in the best interest of all parties, especially the
	survivors who were the victims of Epstein's terrible abuse, a statement
	released by JP Morgan on Monday morning. So I wonder if this is it?
	I mean, that probably means that Jamie Dimon ain't testifying, right?
	Like, let's be honest.
	And I said this.
	I go, look, they're starting to pay out.
	They don't want these guys testifying.
	Now, my question is, are they going to serve Wexner?
	They've been trying to, right?
	That could happen.
	That might happen. I'm not sure it's going to happen.
	I'd like to see it happen.
	But if they serve Wexner, is he going to pay out?
	He hasn't paid out yet.
	He's had old Dershowitz as his lawyer.
	And old Dersh has been pretty good about keeping his dirty ass hands clean.
	Just saying.
	Just saying. David Boies, an attorney acting on behalf of Epstein victims, said the historic recoveries from the banks who provided financial services to Jeffrey Epstein speak for themselves.
	It's taken a long time.
	Too long. But today is a great day for Jeffrey Epstein survivors and a great day for justice.
	What about all those other people that didn't survive?
	What about justice for them and the network?
	When I say justice for the network, I'm talking about, you know, incarcerations beyond Ghislaine Maxwell.
	Just saying. Sigrid McCauley, another of the victim's lawyers, said, the settlement that have been reached are both life-changing and historic for the survivors.
	Money... Which for far too long flowed with impunity between Jeffrey Epstein's global sex trafficking enterprise and Wall Street's leading banks is decisively being used for good.
	The settlements signal that financial institutions have an important role to play in spotting and shutting down sex trafficking.
	Brad Edwards, who's an attorney that's been on this for a long time, he's the one that's actually talked about his conversation with Trump and Trump actually reaching back out to him.
	An attorney representing the Jane Doe who launched the case said the information and support the U.S. Virgin Islands and its legal team provided to the survivors was enormously valuable and we recognize the importance of the government's continued litigation against JPMorgan Chase to prevent future crimes.
	A spokesman for the U.S. Virgin Islands government which is still suing the bank over similar violations said okay so the Virgin Islands case is still open.
	See, there's a multitude of these.
	We are gratified to hear about the settlement that will provide victims of Jeffrey Epstein some compensation for JPMorgan
	Chase's role in facilitating the Epstein crimes against them.
	The U.S. Virgin Islands will continue to proceed with its enforcement action to ensure full accountability for JPMorgan's
	violations of law and prevent the bank from assisting and profiting from human trafficking in the future.
	Interesting. Wow.
	So, man, they're getting hit hard, dude.
	I mean, that's a lot of cheese.
	Are they going to be hit for a billion altogether?
	I mean, that's chump change compared to what you did, America.
	You grifted. You grifting bastards.
	I mean, look at these ultimate grifts.
	Epstein was a client between 1998 and 2013, seven years after he was arrested and convicted of using underage prostitutes in Palm Beach, Florida.
	Bank employees were concerned about Epstein's large cash withdrawals, some of which were used to pay underage girls in exchange for sex, but he was allowed to remain a client for years.
	Look... I'm not saying that's not horrific, the large cash withdrawals for the girls.
	They were, listen, go listen to some of the victims.
	They're getting hundreds of dollars. That's not large cash withdrawals.
	There's other things going on there, number one.
	And number two, it's the backdoor business deals worth tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions of dollars that actually mattered.
	The withdrawals rang alarm bells among compliance officials.
	But he explained them away by claiming they were for fuel and landing fees for his private plane.
	I'm sure it was a lot more.
	You know, I think you scratch the surface.
	You scratch and sniff that one.
	What do you got? You got drug dealing.
	You got, obviously, the trafficking.
	And you got arms dealing, man.
	You got a lot of influence peddling.
	That's what you got.
	Influence peddling.
	There's that magical word again.
	Influence. Speaking of influence, the Tuckins, Tucker Carlson says he will not be science defiant attorney for ex-Fox News host, rejects network cease and desist letter demanding he pull his Twitter series that now has drowned 169 million views.
	That's two episodes.
	It's around 22 minutes.
	It's still dominating what the mainstream media can do.
	Okay? And look, You know, he was poking the bear at some taboos.
	Again, in the second episode.
	I just wish that we hadn't gone, like, full alien tart.
	We gotta get... Somebody's gotta really talk to the tuckens about that.
	Because, like, this whistleblower now saying that malevolent aliens have murdered.
	They've murdered!
	They've taken enjoyment of it.
	I mean, something out of, like, Signs.
	Remember Signs? It wasn't that great.
	Mel Gibson, M. Night, Shamalama, Ding Dong movie.
	And, like, the coolest part of the whole movie, in my opinion, was the shaky cam footage of, like, the nasty-looking, almost predator-slash-alien combo pack in the streets.
	Right? That was it.
	Everything else kind of subpar.
	I think Joaquin Phoenix is the other person in that one.
	It just wasn't that great of a film.
	And now you've got that 10-foot alien story.
	You've got the kid doing interviews.
	Who knows what happened there?
	Who knows what happened there?
	Like... I almost don't even want to speculate on that one because it's so over-the-top and utterly ridiculous.
	All right. John Bolton back on the scene.
	John Bolton says Trump kept classified documents because he thought they were cool and suggests ex-president should go to jail for making nation's top secrets to Mar-a-Lago.
	John Bolton, traitor.
	Again, Trump, why'd you put this guy in your administration?
	I know he was Roger Stone's poker buddy for a time, but come on.
	Come on, man. Walrus mustache?
	I mean, literally, not a good guy.
	I got an exchange with him.
	I'm not sure who's calling who Satan or the devil or something like that.
	But it's between Mattis and Bolton.
	Like, coming up the stairs.
	Let's see if we can find it.
	Mattis, Bolton, Satan.
	Satan. Yes, yes, there it is.
	I mean, you know, this is why we do it live.
	Here we go. Mattis to Bolton.
	I hear you're the devil incarnate.
	The Secretary of Defense James Mattis just moments ago received John Bolton, who's going to be the president's new national security advisor.
	Let me play this little clip, what we just heard.
	Mr. Secretary, it's so good to see you.
	Thank you for inviting me on. Oh, no.
	Thanks for coming, and it's good to finally meet you.
	Absolutely. I've heard that you're absolutely In case you didn't hear the Secretary of Defense.
	Oh, I heard it. Wolf.
	I bet you. And his eyebrows raised.
	The devil incarnate.
	Those are the kind of fun laughs that they had inside the Defense Department.
	The fun laughs. Look, John Bolton is absolutely the worst.
	And again, Trump gets in.
	Who's your cabinet, man?
	Let's start talking about your cabinet right now.
	Well, let's talk about some of the people that worked for you that were not good people.
	Let's keep, like, the Kissingers and the Karl Rove's away.
	And the Bill Barr's away.
	And the Pompeo's away.
	Just saying. Probably in your best interest, big dude.
	Here for you. John Bolton, not the best.
	He thought they were cool.
	Let's say it again. He could declassify them at any time.
	The overclassification of documents is over the top and has been for a very long time.
	We all know it. That shows we don't live in a quote-unquote democracy.
	We certainly don't live in a constitutional republic with democratic principles like we're supposed to and checks and balances like we're supposed to.
	Right? The three branches.
	Judicial, executive, legislative.
	So this guy just wants to pad his stats and And have a cool library.
	He's probably not wrong about that part.
	And nope, let's put him in prison.
	Let's put Trump in prison.
	Let's go to a word from our sponsor.
	And then guys, just so you know, second hour, freebie, rvmrumble.com.
	Make sure to follow and subscribe to the Rumble channels, rvmrumble.com.
	That's where you see the second hour uncensored and free.
	Do you owe $10,000 or more to the IRS? Have you been threatened with levies or have unfiled returns?
	The IRS is hiring 87,000 agents to boost IRS collections and they have the power to seize assets, freeze bank accounts, And they can even take your home.
	Tax Network USA can help you today before it's too late.
	Our CPAs and certified tax experts have proven strategies that work for taxpayers time and time again.
	These same strategies have saved over $500 million in back taxes, permanently resolving tax debts for good.
	Stop collections and get relief today before it's too late.
	Final segment of that first hour.
	I want to just hit this...
	I don't know what's going on here, but child plane passenger 11 dies after losing consciousness on Turkish Airlines flight to New York.
	Made the emergency landing in Budapest.
	Couldn't save the kid's life. I wonder how many tragedies over the next couple of years we're going to see on planes that we never really saw in mass.
	And I'm hoping a lot of them don't have to do with kids.
	But the possibilities are out there.
	They're simply out there.
	Alright, let's get a little taste of where we're going into the second hour in here and why you're going to be around.
	So, we talked about agenda articles.
	Right? The WEF. And what I found was really, really interesting is I saw this tweet and I didn't know whether it was real or not.
	Lots of fake news stories out there.
	This one's starting to go viral.
	I want to make sure it wasn't fake.
	Slay News over here talks about an interview with, I think it's Pedro Panata or something like that.
	Pedro Pinto.
	And look where it is. It's in Lisbon, Portugal.
	So, okay, now all of a sudden my eyes raised up.
	They raised up. Oh, Lisbon, Portugal.
	Why was that important? Harari was spotted at Lisbon, Portugal, okay, as Bilderberg took off that Thursday, but he wasn't on the list.
	Now, I have insinuated, and I think I'm standing by it, but I can't prove it.
	I want to make that clear.
	It just seems like a real big coinkydink he showed up there.
	He showed up while Bilderberg was there, not on the list.
	Now, I interviewed Charlie Skelton, another great premium you're going to want to check out.
	Again, Charlie Skelton, thank you so much for doing that interview with me.
	Very enlightening. He's like the only mainstream journalist that's doing a fair take and exposing Bilderberg.
	And his Twitter feed was beyond reproach.
	It was impeccable, really.
	Just fantastic, especially given the information.
	He didn't think, he thinks it was a coincidence.
	He goes, look, these people are so brazen, Jason.
	Why wouldn't he just come out and say it?
	I think he would. And I was like, alright, hey.
	Fair game to you, Charlie.
	I didn't believe it. But, that solidified to me that, listen, this is probably a real story.
	So then what I did was, I typed in Pedro Pinto, and I typed in Yoval Noah Harari, and guess what?
	It's a 45 minute interview.
	Now I watched like three clips of it and each clip was really important.
	They didn't actually have the quote in here, okay, where apparently Harari calls for AI
	to rewrite the Bible and create religions that are actually correct.
	But from the clips I saw, he was talking about religion as a fantasy.
	He was talking about some of the downsides of AI. He was going with the perspective of Eric Schmidt that we need to slow down AI. We can't stop it.
	We need to slow it down. We let the government control it.
	Oh, the government's going to control it.
	Yes, we let the government control so much.
	It talks about the regulation of medicines.
	It talks about the regulation of selling like an automobile.
	We need more government control over this technology.
	Which I've warned about time and time again, is like the Uber agenda every single damn time.
	Which puts us, you know, the plebs, the surf class, at a distinct disadvantage.
	Just pointing that out.
	And this time, it's for all the marbles.
	So, what I want to do, first of all, what I want to do is I want to believe in magic right here.
	And I want to change this to the correct screen, this one here.
	And I want to start it off with a little bit of the Harari.
	And the other thing was, you know where I found these videos?
	On his own YouTube. And I didn't realize, Harari's got over half a million subscribers on his own YouTube, everybody.
	Just want to point that out. Fundaco!
	I don't know what that is.
	Let's skip through that.
	Humanity's not that simple.
	Hello and welcome to a very special edition of It's Not That Simple.
	Special because it's the first one ever recorded in front of a live audience here at the Stufa Fria in Lisbon.
	And also because we're delighted to have our special guest, renowned author, historian as well, Yuval Noah It'll be fantastic to be able to discuss with him his perspective on humanity, which is our topic of the day.
	Of course, he is globally known for a variety of work in this area about the past, present and future of humanity.
	And we're going to try to explain why it's not that simple.
	Yuval, welcome to Portugal.
	Thank you. And the premise of this show is trying to break down complicated subjects.
	Today's topic is particularly complicated.
	To set the stage, I think it'd be nice for you to try to paint a picture of humanity in 2023.
	And tell us what you see and why it's difficult, perhaps, to preview the future.
	Man, that is a large crowd for you of all.
	I have no idea how popular this show is internationally.
	English-speaking audience.
	And I've yet to nail down The exact date as to which this took place.
	But I wonder whether it was during the Bilderberg Conference or maybe the weekend after.
	Now, if it's the weekend after, he's spending a full week there.
	Just saying. This time.
	Well, we are now almost like gods in terms of our powers of creation and destruction.
	We now have the power to create new life forms, but also to destroy much of life on Earth, including ourselves.
	We are facing two really big challenges.
	On the one hand, the threat of ecological collapse.
	That's a lie.
	See, that's why we have to start right there.
	You know, everything up until that point, right, he's telling the truth about.
	We do have the power, and whether it's godlike or not, we do have the power to create biological life that would not exist except for our bio-nanotechnology, our chimeric experimentations.
	Biowarfare programs, really.
	Transhumanist programs, really.
	But this ecological collapse, that's the religion.
	And that's the religion they'd love AI to rewrite.
	And that's the big lie.
	On the other hand, the threat of technological disruption.
	We are creating extremely powerful tools like AI that could undermine human civilization.
	And maybe the worst thing is that instead of uniting in order to face these common challenges to our species, We are dividing.
	We are fighting each other more and more.
	There are rising tensions on the international level.
	There are rising tensions within societies.
	One society after the other is really on the brink of collapse.
	So, you know, maybe the most important question to ask about humans, about humanity, is if we are so smart, why are we doing so many stupid things?
	Let me stop that right there.
	The idea that, number one, human beings are going to be perfect, that's not what we are.
	We are extremely competitive species.
	You could call us tribal at times.
	And unfortunately, in my opinion, the generational powers that shouldn't be, those in the predator class at the top, they don't like competition.
	They don't want a new tribe rising up.
	Especially one that would actually empower humanity.
	They want their stranglehold.
	Okay? Okay.
	And that's the reason that these things happen.
	Because you have a clique.
	Why do they do so many stupid things?
	Because you've got a clique that's hell-bent on human misery and collectivism.
	And they don't want the individuals to flourish.
	Now, don't get me wrong. In any kind of a free society, you're going to have a level of crime.
	You are going to have anomalous behavior.
	When I say anomalous behavior, you can't rid the world of evil altogether.
	It's part of free will.
	It's part of humanity, in my opinion.
	You should expose it.
	You shouldn't let it get too powerful, but we have.
	That's the stupid thing, is that we haven't challenged or held accountable many of the most evil people and entities out there, in my opinion.
	Why are we called our species Homo sapiens?
	Wise humans.
	And yet we are engaged in so many self-destructive activities and we seem unable to stop ourselves.
	So that I think is the paradox of the smart humans, the wise humans.
	It's a great place to start and you know when I was introducing you obviously I was very short because I want to make the most out of these 40 minutes that I have with you.
	I could list your accolades and your books and your achievements.
	But let's focus on the content and obviously I've heard a lot of your interviews, of your talks and There's something that we can't get around at the moment in 2023, which is technology, the advance of technology.
	When I was growing up, and we're more or less the same age, I'm 48, I still remember that Pong game where you had basically two white rectangles going back and forth with a ball bouncing off the screen.
	And it's crazy where we are now.
	You know, I have a two and a half year old daughter and this new frontier of artificial intelligence is incredibly dangerous, I think, because I'm really wondering what her generation is going to be like, how they're going to learn, how they're going to do anything for themselves.
	Well, they've been taught more and more That artificial reality is more important.
	That this kind of fake it till you make it or never make it and always fake it mentality is okay.
	Let's throw a filter.
	Live time to make myself more beautiful.
	Let's take 26 pictures of something and then let's edit that person out and let's put that up.
	Let's smile while I do it even though I'm not happy.
	Right? Let's immerse myself even further into this video game.
	And don't get me wrong! Video games, just like movies or television shows, or sports, there's a time for entertainment.
	But all of a sudden, this is going to absorb my whole world.
	He just made that Pong reference.
	Obviously, these things have become more and more entertaining, more and more immersive.
	I like a good video game.
	To this day, I'm a big Mortal Kombat guy.
	New Mortal Kombat's about to drop.
	Very expensive. Might wait for a sale.
	Might not. Who knows? Maybe I'll spoil myself.
	But it's there. I can put it down.
	A lot of these people aren't able to put it down anymore.
	Because of that learned helplessness.
	I'll just live with mommy and daddy.
	I'll just live off the state.
	A UBI is a good idea.
	You understand? Alright, final commercial break.
	And then we're going to go over to the second hour, rvmrumble.com.
	Make sure you're subscribing.
	We love the internet, but the internet is tracking everything you do.
	Take control of your online privacy with IPVanish.
	People with malicious intent are everywhere watching you.
	Criminals can hack your Wi-Fi, while broadband providers and advertisers monitor your data.
	With IPVanish on your device, your internet activity is encrypted.
	No one can see what you're doing.
	Your location, your connection, completely hidden.
	Protect your internet privacy today with IPVanish.
	RVMVPN.com. I use IPVanish myself, guys.
	Alright, second hour is about to begin.
	We're going to continue with Harari.
	I'd love for you to come on over at RVMRumble.com.
	And again, if you want to check out those premium interviews, those primos, baby.
	Consider doing so over at redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
	It really does help support the broadcast.
	Sign up for a week for only a buck.
	It's ten bucks a month after that.
	Or lock it in. Lock it on in.
	Lock it and pop it. Lock it and pop it.
	For a year. And you do that for $100, you save $20.
	Again, really supports the broadcast.
	YouTube, I'm sorry, but we will have to see you on the flip side.
	Alright, we're off the Tubins!
	And we're up and running over on Rumble and Rockfin only.
	Hopefully you have checked us out over at rvmrumble.com where again, there's this large network going on all day.
	Wayne Dupree. Chad Canton.
	Ray Dietrich. Drew Berquist.
	Get it. Matt Couch.
	Good stuff. All day.
	Okay. Let's get back to Harari.
	And we're going to have to jump.
	It's going to start with that damn intro again.
	But that's alright. That's alright.
	Because we can just hit the continue.
	Tell us about AI, in your words, the opportunities and the challenges that you see.
	So we need to know three things about AI. First of all, AI is still just a tiny baby.
	We haven't seen anything yet.
	Real AI deployed into the world, not in some laboratory or in science fiction, is about like 10 years old.
	And, you know, you look at the wonderful scenery outside of all these plants and trees, and you think about biological evolution.
	The evolution of life on Earth took something like four billion years.
	Four billion years to reach these plants and to reach us, human beings.
	And again, man, every time I hear this stuff, I say it like this.
	I have no idea what was going on on the planet a thousand years ago, ten thousand years, a hundred thousand, a million, four billion years.
	Come on, man.
	Everybody acts so cocksure about what the world was like at that point.
	What are we talking about?
	Seriously. I'm not saying that there's no validity to, you know, Archaeology.
	Obviously, we should study past civilizations and past histories.
	When you're getting to the billions, you're really stretching it.
	You're really stretching it.
	Carbon dating! I mean, come on.
	But again, Harari, the guy that's telling you that we're bad for the earth, he's got a solution, baby.
	Now, AI is now at the stage of, I don't know, amoebas.
	It's like four billion years ago, and the first living organisms are crawling out of the organic soup.
	And so ChatGPT and all these wonders, they are the amoebas of the AI world.
	What would T-Rex look like?
	And how long would it take for the AI amoebas to evolve into the T-Rexes?
	I mean, look at the little smircles on his face while he says it.
	Is anybody else sort of kind of like a little bit disturbed about that aspect of it?
	I know I am. Just pointing that out.
	And it won't take billions of years.
	Maybe it takes just a few decades or a few years.
	Because the evolution of AI is at a completely different timescale than the evolution of organic beings.
	Because AI itself works on a different timescale.
	AI is always on.
	Computers in general are always on.
	Humans and other organisms, they live, they exist, they develop by cycles.
	We need to rest sometime.
	AI never needs to rest.
	Now, the other two things we need to know about AI is that first, it's the first technology ever that can make decisions by itself.
	I hear a lot of people saying, oh, all these worries about AI, every time there is a new technology, people worry about it, and afterward it's okay.
	Like when people invented writing and printing presses and airplanes, they were so worried, and in the end it was okay, AI will be the same.
	It's not the same.
	I see. Here's where I agree.
	But he's going to take it to a place where the AI is actually independent.
	And don't get me wrong, that is a concern.
	I'm still worried about who's programming and in control of the AI and its message.
	Period. No previous technology in history could make decisions.
	You know, even an atom bomb Actually empowered humans, because an atom bomb can destroy a city, it cannot decide which city to bomb.
	You always need a human to make the decision.
	AI is the first technology that can make decisions by itself, even about us.
	Increasingly, we apply to a bank to get a loan.
	It's an AI making the decisions about us, so it takes power away from us.
	The third thing about AI that everybody needs to know, it's the first technology ever that can create new ideas.
	You know, the printing press, radio, television, they broadcast, they spread the ideas created by the human brain, by the human mind.
	They cannot create a new idea.
	So, you know, this goes along the lines.
	Let me see if I can bring it up. I think his name is Steve.
	And he had an imagination machine.
	Let's see.
	There it is right there.
	And this is something that Bushnell constantly talked about.
	And, you know, this is in March.
	Stephen Thaler claims he's built a sentient AI. Thaler's AI company claims to have mapped thinking itself onto a system of neural networks.
	He demoed the technology for the Chicago ACM. So yeah, this happened a month and a half ago.
	Obviously, the imagination machine I was talking about is something completely different.
	So I have no idea.
	I've got to dig into this.
	Obviously, pretty extensive for me just to fall into.
	But, again, Thaler and his team are the ones working on this, so is it truly independent?
	Is it truly sentient?
	That's what they're trying to sell us on.
	I'm not so sure.
	Let's continue. You know, Gutenberg printed the Bible in the middle of the 15th century.
	The printing press printed as many copies of the Bible as Gutenberg instructed it, but it did not create a single new page.
	It had no ideas of its own about the Bible.
	Is it good? Is it bad?
	How to interpret this?
	How to interpret that? AI can create new ideas, can even write a new Bible.
	We, you know, throughout history, religions dreamt about having a book written by a superhuman intelligence, by a
	non-human entity.
	Every religion claims our book, all the other books of the other religions, humans wrote them.
	But our book, no, no, no, no, no, it came from some superhuman intelligence.
	In a few years, there might be religions that are actually correct.
	So here's the quote from Sleigh News.
	Congrats to Slay, got the story right.
	Here he is, basically saying, not only is the AI possibly going to become a new religion, they're going to rewrite history.
	It's funny, I got sent this because I had a conversation with Zach Voorhees yesterday, the Google whistleblower.
	Here it is right here.
	And check it out.
	And so weird, this happened in Bavaria, Germany.
	AI-powered church service in Germany draws a large crowd.
	It was positively surprised how well it worked, said one attendee.
	On Friday, over 300 people attended an experimental chat GPT-powered church service at St.
	Paul's Church in the Bavarian town of Fuhrer, Germany.
	Reports the AP the 40-minute sermon included text generated by open AIs, chat GBT chatbot and
	delivered by avatars, avatars on a television screen above the altar. There you
	go.
	You're taking a look at it.
	We're here. We're in the post-truth world where the AI is going to write a Bible, according to Harari.
	That's correct. That is correct.
	Just think about a religion whose holy book is written by an AI. That could be a reality in a few years.
	You know, when I was preparing this interview, I wrote down questions that I would like to ask you, and then I asked ChatGPT to create 10 questions that it would like to ask you.
	And I've been doing this for a long time, okay?
	25 years I've been doing this.
	Its questions were better than mine.
	I'm gonna be honest with you.
	It was absolutely insane.
	And it took it five seconds, seven seconds to write it out, and I'm still using the first version.
	And when you talk about it being a baby, I'm like, that's a pretty scary baby we're talking about here, right?
	And when you said at the end, towards the end of your book, 21 Lessons for the 21st Century, when we have maybe decades, some years left, when we need to discover who we are before algorithms tell us who we are, how fast is that happening?
	And what does that process look like before humans normally are just going to go to an AI solution before they go to this solution?
	It's moving faster than I think almost anybody expected, faster than I expected, despite all my engagement with the field and what I wrote in Homo Deus and 21 Lessons.
	I don't think that it's going faster than what somebody like Kurzweil Or the Defense Department has predicted.
	I mean, if you look at NASA, again, they tell you 2020, the bio-nano era, the bio-nano almost quantum era.
	The next is the virtual era.
	So there's a lot of transhumanism in between, and Kurzweil himself has predicted that singularity for some time, right around 2030.
	Seven years away?
	I mean... It's spooky to me how quickly it's rolling out commercially right now.
	At a point where our economic system is in peril.
	At a point where almost nothing can be trusted.
	At a point where our leader is the clearest puppet we've ever had in my lifetime.
	Period. It's not even close.
	I'm still surprised by how fast it is moving and how powerful the new generation of AI is.
	And actually, the new generation is not out.
	It's in the laboratories, but it's already there.
	It's even much more powerful than chat GPT. And I think that to have a fighting chance, we need time.
	And I said before, humans, we are organic beings.
	We move in cycles.
	We move on organic time.
	And we are the most, maybe the most adaptable animals on the planet, but adaptation itself requires time.
	And now we've reached a point when there is no time.
	And here we go again.
	This idea that you can slow it down.
	No. All he's talking about is really the social and physical acclimation of the technology on behalf of this fourth industrial revolution agenda.
	And it's not going to buy humanity time.
	Instead, it's going to allow a small section of humanity to outright control the rest of us.
	AI is moving too fast.
	And I think that it's the responsibility therefore of governments to buy us time by slowing it down.
	Now, I have no illusion that we can stop research in AI. It's not going to happen.
	But what I expect from governments is to regulate the deployment of AI into society.
	This is exactly what I've been talking about.
	Government control of what you can use and how you can use it.
	And what source code is allowed to be inspected.
	Or what data sets.
	You get it?
	I mean, that's the biggest danger in my opinion.
	Which governments do it with so many other products.
	You know, if I'm a drug company and I develop a new drug, a new medicine, I can't just begin to sell it to people Unless it first goes through a complicated and sometimes lengthy process of checking it for safety, side effects, and so forth.
	If I build a new type of car, I cannot just place it on the road and start driving.
	It has to go through, again, a lengthy process of making sure it's safe.
	And we know how safe and effective the mRNA shots are.
	Made and deployed by the Defense Department in partnership with Moderna and its other strategic collaborators were.
	We know how safe and effective OxyContin was and we know how safe and effective the SSRI drugs are.
	So those systems have already been outright gamed by government monopolies, corruption, lobbyists.
	Outright gamed.
	But we're supposed to give them more power with the most advanced technology out there.
	Great idea. Awesome idea.
	We talk about government regulation.
	That essentially means that when they say it's illegal or somebody comes up with something else, no, no, no, no, no.
	It'll be like the ultimate censorship.
	We need the same thing for AI. It's just common sense.
	There's no doubt about it, but let's be honest here.
	Different governments have different interests, and many times they're not exactly walking around, playing nice with each other all the time, and one says, are you doing it?
	No, I'm not. I swear I'm not doing it.
	How can we regulate this, really, and hold people accountable in this process that is so dangerous?
	Because, as you said, there are new ideas being created.
	These new ideas can fall into the wrong hands.
	So what are we looking at here from a governmental standpoint?
	So again, we need to distinguish between regulating deployment and regulating development.
	Ideally, we should be able to regulate development too, but that's much, much more difficult.
	Not dangerous. No, that is much more dangerous.
	Because again, what it's going to do is every time something goes outside of the realm of the great narrative via this AI or gives the advantage to a person, a group, an entity that it's not supposed to give the advantage of, we're going to take it from you.
	We're going to regulate it.
	And then we're going to dick a dick a do with it before we redeploy it if we ever redeploy it.
	That's how that works.
	Because of this, what you talked about, of the arms race.
	Like, every government would say, we don't want to develop this dangerous technology, but the Chinese are doing it, the Israelis are doing it, so we have to do it also.
	That's very difficult. But deployment should be more easy.
	That, okay, you research new generation of AI, but you cannot deploy it, let's say, in the EU, Unless it goes first through these safety checks.
	Now, if the Chinese want to deploy it in China, okay, they can go ahead and deploy it in China, but they can't do it in the EU. And of course, democracies and dictatorships have different needs.
	One of the big dangers of AI is that it will basically destroy the democratic conversation.
	Dictatorships are based on dictating.
	One person dictating everything.
	Democracy works by having a conversation between people.
	What should we do about this or that?
	Now, conversation is done with language.
	And the basis for conversation is trust between people.
	Now, what happens when you have entities which are not human at all, And can converse with you and be even more persuasive or create intimate relationships with you and you don't even know that they are not human.
	Yeah, no, it's a big problem.
	It's a big, big problem.
	And it's like, why would we ever allow that to happen?
	And really the regulation is if that is deployed and employed, obviously it's a criminal act of fraud and it needs to be prosecuted.
	Okay, things are going to need to be clearly labeled parodies, etc.
	Because it puts us all at great risk.
	And again, Kurzweil in the beginning, with the age of spiritual machines, didn't say these things would be conscious, but they would be so, so, so persuasive, we would believe that they were in fact conscious.
	Okay. So you go online and have a discussion about, I don't know, the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
	And it's a very nice person, and it knows by some supernatural ability just how to say exactly what you think.
	And get into your good graces.
	And after a few weeks of building this kind of very good relationship with you, it starts telling you, you know, actually there are some valid reasons why the Russians invaded Ukraine.
	And you think it's a human being, and maybe you develop feelings for that person, but actually it's a Russian bot.
	Oh, it's the Russians.
	You questioned your military leaders and what's going on in Ukraine.
	You gave any validity to Poot-Poot or Medvedev or Dugan talking points.
	All of a sudden, you've been had by the AI. You see why I don't trust these people?
	Now, we know in previous years that there was a battle for human attention between algorithms trying to grab our attention, and this was one of the main reasons for the spread of fake news and conspiracy theories and hatred, because the algorithms discovered that the easiest way to grab your attention is with hatred and outrage and fear.
	Now the battlefront is shifting from attention to intimacy.
	That if we don't regulate it, there will be an arms race for intimacy.
	Different AIs competing to create intimacy with us because the easiest way to persuade you to change your political views, to buy some product, to vote for some politician, is to create an intimate connection.
	And this will destroy democracy if we allow it to happen.
	Because democracy is a conversation between people.
	If it becomes a conversation between bots and people, where the bots have all the power, that's the end of democracy.
	And again, this should be a very simple regulation.
	It's not regulating the development of AI capable of forming intimacy.
	It's just have a very clear law that it is illegal to counterfeit humans.
	For thousands of years, we had laws that it's illegal to counterfeit money.
	If we didn't have these laws, the economic system would have collapsed.
	But here's the thing.
	I don't want to give a monopoly to the government to grift by creating counterfeit humans.
	Obviously, we need to protect against avatars Or programs or AI set up as deception, especially if they are impersonating others.
	I mean, this is it.
	Things will get leaked onto the internet that are complete and total AI creations.
	It's easy to counterfeit money, but if you do that, you go to jail for many, many years.
	It should be the same with humans.
	Until now, there was no technology that could do that, so there were no such laws.
	But there should be a very clear and very extreme law that if you or your platform counterfeits humans, you go to jail for 20 years.
	Now, it's okay.
	We need AI doctors.
	It's fine. As long as the AI tells us it's an AI and you interact with it, it tells you, hello, I'm an AI doctor.
	Do you want some advice on your whatever?
	See, and I don't want them in the health industry.
	Period. Like, that's the thing.
	It's not a human being.
	It's not going to have empathy.
	If it's garbage in on the data set, on the program, it's garbage out on the advice it's going to give you.
	And we've already seen, again, what they had Emeka, this humanoid-type robot-slash-A.I., Say in front of the world on ITV as the New Year's message this year.
	Total and complete crap and garbage like is being spewed out of Harari's mouth.
	You might believe a Russian bot talking point!
	So once again, yeah, you do need some type of regulation, but for what it's being proposed as, it's a lot of Johnny nonsense.
	It's fine. But impersonating a human being and then using it in order to manipulate you, that should be outlawed.
	You know, it's interesting because many people here maybe saw the case of Bruce Willis when there was a deep fake of Bruce Willis.
	ad campaign in Russia and he actually had to come out and say, hey guys, that's not
	me, that's a computer generated image.
	And this is just a small example of many others that could come our way, whether it's with
	real people that already exist, being duplicated, right?
	Which could also be incredibly dangerous if something is posted on social media or just
	completely anonymous, silly generated humans as well that are actually AI.
	You mentioned algorithms.
	You mentioned bots.
	And our first experience with these words and with these tools and phenomenon, I think, was in social media.
	And you said that in our first kind of battle with AI or contact with AI, we lost with social media.
	How do you see the social media sphere now?
	Because I see the world increasingly polarized.
	And it's so difficult to find common ground and common sense, where people are constantly looking to feel right and good about their ideas instead of identifying facts, where they care more about opinions than actually facts.
	That's across the board.
	It's not just opinions, it's feelings, but that's again a lot of media manipulation.
	And the facts that are authoritative are often lies.
	They're not facts at all.
	The fact checkers, you know, the censorship.
	I was unaware about this deepfake thing.
	That's from September of 21.
	So this is almost two years old.
	Let's see it. Let's take a look here It was an authorized one
	And I'm going to put a little bit of this in.
	So, yeah. I mean, he's going to be selling his image.
	I saw that he denied it after the fact that he was going to start licensing.
	But, I mean, right here.
	There you go. Let's see what we got for the deepfake in real time.
	Let's go. Done pretty damn well.
	And this is almost, what, two years old?
	Is it even two years old?
	What was the date on this one?
	September? Yeah. A few months, it'll be two years old.
	And they were working on it before.
	All right, let's go back to Harari and what he's going to say about social media.
	Which is, again, is very worrying in political elections and the sort.
	And of course, we've got a big one coming in the United States.
	We saw what happened the last time around.
	So I know there's a lot to unpack there, but...
	As far as artificial intelligence and the impact that it is having in our behavior and how it can affect the outcome of elections, what do you see?
	So again, if we look back at social media, so we know it's of course not the only reason for polarization in the world, but it is a major reason.
	And it's the first time that decisions made by non-human intelligence have changed human politics.
	Now, when you ask...
	Let me just stop that here.
	I'm so sick of this garbage.
	The Russian bot, GRU garbage.
	Come on, man.
	Yeah, when we talk about bots, they're usually controlled by humans.
	They're not AI. They're not a non-human intelligence.
	Alright? Even the bots that are deployed, the messages are written by humans.
	And again, the Russia, Russia, Russia scaring is just ridiculous.
	Many of these companies, Facebook and YouTube and Twitter, they say, it's not us.
	It's not us. We are just a platform.
	Just as you can't blame radio, the technology of radio, if Hitler gives a speech on the radio, and you cannot blame the printing press if somebody uses the printing press to print some fake news propaganda, you cannot blame us if humans go online and create some conspiracy theory that radicalizes people and polarizes society.
	But either they are completely naive and don't know their own power, or they're lying to us.
	They're lying to us. Because they've got data.
	Newspapers didn't have data.
	Radios didn't have data.
	It's not just the data, it's the decisions.
	That radio... Radio did not tell you what to listen to.
	You had to actively choose, I want to listen to this station, I want to listen to that station.
	What happened in social media over the last 10 years or so is that you had recommendation algorithms that actively push content.
	Let's start here. That's such a misnomer. In the beginning, when you followed
	somebody or you were a friend with somebody and connected, you got their
	posts. Those people instituted the algorithms, all right, to feed narratives,
	to feed agendas before mass censorship. People were shadow banned on Twitter long
	before the COVID 1984 nightmare. So all of this aggregated content, you know,
	don't get me wrong, there was an aggregation to become more popular than
	For instance, Google Video Obviously had an algorithm that would challenge YouTube and then allow it to pick that up.
	And YouTube, in order to become the number one video platform and stay atop for there, did run algorithms of popular material.
	But certain material always got censored.
	Oh, I mean, again, you look at like We Are Change.
	They were having videos taken down.
	It became less and less fair on purpose.
	So they caused the problem and then they've got the solution for you.
	To people. Recommending read this article, watch this video, and even more than that, if you watch YouTube and you do nothing, it keeps showing you one video after the other.
	It doesn't, you don't need to do anything active.
	You just sit there. I don't know.
	You want to know something about the 9-11 attacks.
	So it starts with, I don't know, a video from CNN. And you do nothing.
	Within a couple of iterations, it would show you the most outrageous conspiracy theories.
	Look at them shaking their heads.
	And notice he specifically talked about 9-11.
	Oh, outrageous conspiracy theories?
	Like the Pakistani ISI? Funding the hijackers just before the attacks.
	Being in D.C. just before the attacks.
	General Mahmoud Ahmed.
	Just before the attacks.
	Meeting with George Tenet and others.
	Meeting with Porter Goss.
	And Bob Graham on the morning of 9-11.
	Meeting with Joe Biden.
	Like that? How about all the Israelis?
	Amdocs, Converse...
	Vans? No?
	No? Bueller?
	Bueller? Is that a conspiracy theory?
	Building 7?
	Michael Hess? Barry Jennings?
	Conspiracy theory? The most outrageous conspiracy theories.
	Again, these people are openly bragging to you now that the AI needs to be controlled by the government and suppress real information that's of the utmost importance.
	In understanding society.
	And this guy, I've been doing this 25 years, just nodding along.
	Pinto just nodding along with it.
	Come on.
	And the algorithm chose to show you that.
	And the algorithm is making the choice not randomly.
	It has aims. It was given an aim.
	And by the way, you know, I want to point out that Harari said either they are knowingly lying or they're ignorant.
	He goes, they're lying! They're lying!
	Meanwhile, I mean, professional liars are sitting up here.
	I mean, I want to believe at least because I know little to nothing about the guy on the left there that he's just naive and ignorant.
	But Harari?
	Harari? Harari damn well knows what's going on.
	He's got a seat at the table.
	Buy the platforms to increase user engagement.
	Like they said, okay, today we have 200 million people watching 40 minutes a day.
	By next year, it should be 300 million people watching for 50 minutes a day.
	That was the aim of the algorithm.
	Go out and get us more eyeballs.
	Get us more minutes on our platform.
	And the algorithm went out and discovered by trial and error, by experimenting on hundreds of millions of people, That the easiest way to grab our attention, to keep us watching more and more, is to press the outrage button.
	If you have one video with this outrageous conspiracy theory, which encourages hate and polarization...
	Outrageous conspiracy!
	It's always about hate.
	It's always about polarization.
	None of them ever point out that a lot of these conspiracy theories take place with the collusion of both the right and the left, the Democrats and the Republicans.
	You know, like good buddies Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush.
	You understand? Or like the extension of his son's presidency, the W, into the Barack star.
	And now they do commercials together to tell you to mask up and inject yourself with government hate and lies.
	Okay? Those are the real threats.
	But no, no, no, no, no.
	The conspiracy theories.
	They're the polarizing ones.
	No, really, if you look at the factual conspiracies that have taken place in large part, it's a partnership Of these cartels together and how they act.
	But, you know, Yoval's got no interest in that.
	No, sir. And you have another video which is much more moderate and calm.
	The algorithm would go for the outrage because it increases user engagement.
	And this was with very primitive AI. And the AI of the present generation It can know you much, much better than the AI, say, of 2016.
	And it can also generate the content by itself.
	It doesn't need to wait for a human to create this outrageous fake news story.
	It can create the fake news story or video by itself.
	So, here we go again.
	Somehow, AI... Is going to create fake news.
	That's not a real thing.
	Again, you're going to have to have a user.
	And fake news is only fake news when the authoritative sources say it's fake news or a conspiracy theory and they censor you.
	And we've seen where that leads.
	And this guy's a huge advocate for that.
	Why aren't alarm bells going off everywhere?
	And I realize that there is a large section of the population that has awoken to guys like this, guys like Gates, guys like Schwab.
	But they still think that this is like a left-right thing.
	It's not. It's not at all.
	Not even a little bit.
	This is a moving forward authoritarianism in your face thing with a technology that is perhaps the most powerful thing humanity has ever created on a multitude of levels.
	So, again, if we don't regulate that, the chances of democracies surviving are very, very low.
	Because, again, dictatorships will survive.
	Dictatorships, they flourish on chaos and on mistrust.
	If you cause people to mistrust each other until they cannot agree on anything, then the only way to still have a society is have a dictatorship.
	To have a democracy, you need that people trust each other and can have a meaningful conversation.
	One thing that I think about a lot is education.
	You know, I just want to say this.
	First of all, in a true quote-unquote democracy, and again, we don't live in a democracy.
	It's a constitutional republic.
	It's a republic with the separation of powers via the states and via the branches of government.
	With the people voting for representatives.
	In order for that to work, forget about the civil disagreements.
	You need accountability at the highest levels, which we do not have.
	You also need a system that is not like the one we have where lobbyists can just come in with all the money in the world and influence politics.
	Monetize lobbying.
	In its modern form should be completely and totally illegal.
	Alright? And the thing is that once you let...
	You let that Pandora's box open and you can't close it.
	We haven't been able to close it.
	And now lobbyists obviously are buying politicians to the point where it's like...
	Oh, you end up working for the big pharma company that you passed legislation for?
	Oh, you're part of Raytheon now.
	Huh. Interesting.
	The Francisco Manuel dos Santos Foundation is an education platform.
	There has been a particular structure to education of young people throughout their formative years.
	And the way I look at technology and especially with AI coming and my little experience with it is What is this going to cause as far as the structure of education globally where children won't really have to study that much and read books that much in order to be able to have access to everything within a few seconds on their tablet or on their phone?
	How do you see?
	That's actually not true because the AI is controlled and it won't have all the data sets.
	We've already seen that.
	You're going to get a baseline Wikipedia-style narrative, unfortunately.
	And what I see happening is you're going to see a massive dumbing down in the amount of critical thinking that's even possible, which we've already seen, which circles back to the grift, gimme, gimme, gimme, UBI-dependent society I don't want to be a part of.
	The future of education and the generations to come and the kind of information that they will have.
	You know, it's the biggest experiment in history conducted on billions of people.
	We have no idea what the social consequences, the psychological consequences will be.
	What happens when you can get just any answer to any question you have?
	You don't need to do anything.
	You just ask your AI assistant.
	And, you know, even Google is terrified because of that.
	Because in Google, you still had to...
	Okay, you Googled something.
	It gave you a list of websites.
	You usually go for the first one.
	And that's a problem.
	But, okay, you do it.
	But then you have to do something yourself.
	You have to read it.
	Now it's a new generation of AI. You don't.
	You just ask the question and you get an answer.
	And the big question is, do you still have some kind of ability for critical thinking to doubt the question you received and to search for alternative questions or to come up with your own questions.
	Sorry, alternative answers and to come up with your own answers.
	And we don't know.
	Again, you have this kind of tendency to say, yeah, we had many previous revolutions in information technology that people were afraid when books came along that people will not be able to remember anything because now everything is written.
	But as I said in the beginning, AI is fundamentally different from every previous information technology.
	It can make decisions.
	It can create content by itself.
	We were never faced by this kind of technology.
	And so we have no idea what the outcome would be in 10 or 20 years in terms of education or of anything else.
	Well, I can see what they're pushing.
	They're already trying to push human beings out of the education and medical systems.
	That's not encouraging at all.
	And again, it all stems from the fact there's zero chance of society in general being allotted access to a truly independent AI, an AI of empowerment.
	Instead, what they are trying to do around AI, simply put, is what he's talking.
	Systems of control.
	Systems of management.
	And those systems of management are part of the regimentation of all human beings.
	I want to move away from AI specifically for a little bit, but continue on technology which continues to have such an impact in our daily lives.
	I think most of us can't be too far away from our phones, for better or for worse.
	We can do everything on there.
	When it comes to technology, It is affecting the way in which we relate to each other.
	Sometimes I talk to my friends about the fact how, in a way, we're regressing.
	We're ever more connected than we have been before, but we communicate in a more distant way than perhaps we have in previous decades, where we've kind of gone back to the Egyptians with the hieroglyphics, with the emojis, and this is the way we're communicating with each other.
	I know you've spent so much time thinking and writing about human relationships and the way in which you see the homo sapiens interacting with each other.
	What would you say about the way that we are dealing with one another these days and how it will evolve?
	Because physical contact seems to be harder and harder to get because more people are staying at home, they're not going to work as much.
	A lot of dating starts online.
	And I know that, for example, with your partner, you met your partner online, right?
	So how do you see this development of personal relationships and connections which we continue to need in order to be sane, I guess?
	First of all, if you look at the trend of the past 20 plus years, when the introduction of the internet started to become prominent at the turn of the century, early 2000s, everybody should remember things like AOL Instant Messenger.
	And I used to use Yahoo Messenger quite a bit.
	That was the beginning of digital interactions.
	And of course, there were dating sites and forums.
	You know, a lot of forums out there.
	Now, forums have kind of gone by the wayside.
	So have message boards where you have a centralized control over social media.
	Which, in my opinion, is all on purpose.
	You want a consolidation...
	Of the legitimate platforms, you want less and less personal human interaction, which is a problem.
	Again, these things are all tools, but if you eventually want people to merge with machines and accept a great narrative that is pushed by machines, well...
	This is the kind of social conditioning you need.
	And we are losing our humanity, but you're also trying to erode the traditional family structure.
	And that's obvious.
	And give more control, by the way, to the quote-unquote educational system and teachers.
	Now, can you imagine when those teachers aren't just dumbed-down, psychologically-manipulated humans that are pushing an agenda, but a programmed agenda by AI? That is the definitive truth.
	Mm hmm. Yeah, so again, there is positive potential, there is negative potential.
	I talked a lot about, and I tend to talk a lot about the negative potential because, you know, the people who develop the technology, they talk a lot about all its good sides, all its promises.
	And there are, of course, a lot of positive potential benefits.
	As you mentioned, I met my husband online more than 20 years ago in one of the first gay dating sites that were available in Israel.
	And the technology was very important and beneficial because, you know, throughout history, You had minorities which were concentrated in one place.
	Like if you're Jewish, then you're usually born to a Jewish family in a Jewish community, so you know lots of other Jews.
	So even if you are a small minority, you have this kind of basic connection with other people like you.
	But with gay people, it's different.
	You're not born to a gay family in a gay community.
	And, you know, being raised, growing up in a small town in Israel, which was a very homophobic society at the time, just meeting other people, just meeting guys for dating was very difficult.
	And then the Internet came along, and this was a wonderful development because the Internet managed to connect this kind of, you know, diffused minorities, right?
	One of the things I don't love about this quote-unquote diffused minorities is that really the internet allowed people to connect with one another on a multitude of levels and interests.
	Not just what they're genetically born into or the religious beliefs that were surrounding them as they grew up.
	Questioning authority.
	Getting government documentation, forums on the JFK assassination, or MKUltra documents, or UFOs.
	Those were all the things that were interesting.
	Me, with the internet at the time, used to be goofed on before the days of swipe dating.
	If you were using like Match.com, FarmersOnly.com.
	Farmers only. I'm glad that those things exist, but that is the power of the internet, that you can connect with somebody thousands of miles away with similar interests and different information and disseminate that information amongst ourselves.
	And listen, I'd be lying.
	Even my current girlfriend, we met through the internet.
	It wasn't through a dating site or anything like that.
	She saw me on the internet.
	Contacted me through the internet.
	We then used the internet to video chat with one another and then finally meet in person.
	Does that happen, you know, 25 years ago?
	No, it doesn't. No, sir.
	So yeah, like every technology, as I've said time and time again, empower, enslave, double-edged sword.
	Let's continue with Harari.
	That are not living together in the same place.
	Suddenly it became much more easy to find each other.
	So this was a great benefit of the technology.
	And we shouldn't ignore these benefits.
	But as you said, humans, deep down, we are social animals.
	And sociability, ultimately, is about the body.
	It's not just about the mind.
	And you have this discussion for, you know, for thousands of years about what humans really are.
	Are they an immaterial soul or an immaterial mind?
	Are they embodied beings, embodied entities?
	And this was a major philosophical topic.
	He's about to light into Christianity here, by the way.
	Really almost dismiss the idea of what some people would call a soul or some type of special consciousness.
	I just want to throw that out there.
	By the way, let's thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
	Remember, we're back tomorrow.
	We do it Monday through Thursday, 9 to 11 a.m.
	RedVoiceMedia.com slash Uncensored is where you can get the two premium...
	Interviews from over the weekend, really great ones, guys.
	Ian Crossland, what a great conversation we had there.
	I'd really encourage people to check that out, along with Ryan Christian from The Last American Vagabond, where we talked about Technocracy, Inc., Howard Scott, population control, and obviously artificial intelligence.
	But you see, say, in ancient Christianity.
	This discussion that Jesus and the first Christians, influenced by Jewish traditions, they believed very firmly that humans are bodies.
	Which is why Christ rises in the body.
	He's resurrected in the body.
	And when Christ initially talks about the kingdom of heaven, he means the kingdom of heaven on earth.
	He tells his followers that there'll be this perfect kingdom here on earth.
	You know, with trees and stones and people.
	But over time, under the influence especially of Platonic philosophy, Christianity drifted away.
	From this view of humans as embodied and placed greater and greater emphasis on the immaterial soul or mind.
	It imagined that the body is dirty, the body is animalistic, the body, there is something wrong with it.
	And when...
	You know, when he said that, all I could think of is the transhumanist push that's telling you there's something wrong with your body.
	That push that you have to be something different, that you have to identify as something outside of a biological male or female.
	That push that you're harming the environment.
	You're part of the ecological disaster.
	You're the reason for the financial collapse.
	You're imperfect.
	You're not on all the time like AI. You're carbon-based.
	So, I mean, the irony here of him...
	Essentially saying that Christianity moved to more of a spiritual realm by saying that the body is impure.
	Right? That's what we're told again and again and again and again in this push for transhumanism via guys like Harari and Kurzweil and Rothblatt.
	Just pointing that out. You die, you are not coming back in the body.
	Your soul is liberated from the material body, and it goes not to a kingdom on earth, but to heaven, which is a completely immaterial realm.
	So the Christian fantasy became to completely disconnect from the body.
	And this remained a fantasy for thousands of years.
	Now, with the technology of the 21st century, a lot of very ancient philosophical and theological debates are becoming practical.
	So going with your example, let's say you have some teenager or some person, whatever age, sitting at home, never leaving home, in front of a screen, maybe with some 3D glasses or something.
	They live their lives online.
	In a way, they are realizing the platonic ideal of disconnecting the soul or mind from the body.
	So what do we see there?
	That the metaverse...
	And the virtual reality is going to be the real reality, the one that you experience with your consciousness that you'll eventually be able to upload.
	And you can euthanize the rest.
	So there's about 12 more minutes in that clip that we're not going to get to, that interview.
	I think all three, actually I think two out of the three small clips that I've seen did get played in there.
	Really interesting stuff.
	We want to hear it from the horse's mouth.
	I do want to encourage people to check out my documentary films, Loose Change, Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, A New World Order to Find, and Shade the Motion Picture for free right now.
	Spread the word. I love you guys.
	We'll be back tomorrow.
	It's not about left or right.
	It's always about right and wrong.

▲