Jason Bermas here and joining me now is a familiar face for those that have been following the program for some time.
He is the founder of the River Cities Reader.
You can go to rcreader.com and check out that wonderful website.
He is also a podcaster.
He used to do the Agenda 31 thing.
I think he may have even revived that as well.
And aside from talking about We're good to go.
There is talks of it being completely and totally demolished.
And the one side of the building obviously didn't look so great, but there was a particular business in the front that actually did look rather kept up.
Obviously shocking to wake up to a building collapse like that.
Todd, what do you think?
324 Main Street is the address.
If you want to pull it up, I think there's plenty of media coverage.
National media has been all over it for a couple days.
It's a six-story, 100-plus-year-old building built in 1914.
It was the former Davenport Hotel in downtown Davenport, Iowa.
And it is a rental.
People live there. There's about 50 plus people that live there.
And there had been reports of problems for the last six months with structural issues and brick and repairs that were needed and so forth.
And Sunday night late, it just 5 o'clock around Sunday, 5 o'clock Sunday night, a third of the west side of it collapsed.
Straight down. And it's a big travesty.
It's horrible. There's the building there.
Yeah, you can see it in the background.
And that view that you're looking at right there, that is the view from the front step of City Hall.
So Davenport City Hall actually faces this building.
So they've dealt with it for many years, and it's right in their front yard, this collapse.
I attended the news conference this morning around 11 a.m.
They finally hosted a news conference in the police department.
It was an hour-long conference, and I recorded the whole thing, and I intend to get the audio up at the reader website so people can listen to everything unfiltered.
And I don't know what happened there.
What the hell? Not sure why we lost the video there, Todd.
Just incredible. This camera decides to just have a mind of its own.
Does it go off?
Because we've got another one sitting right here.
Todd, I know I gave you a couple.
We got one right here also.
I don't know why it would just do that.
It's just so weird. That's all right.
We'll keep going as you fix that problem.
Maybe unplug and plug it in.
Turn on the camera. But it certainly...
There it goes right there. Boom!
He's back. Yeah, now it's the laptop camera.
Okay, so anyway, we'll work with that.
Okay. The horrible picture.
Jeez Louise. That's alright.
We'll figure it out. We'll figure it out.
I gotta come over. The high points of the news conference are that there are five people missing, unaccounted for, two of which they believe are in the rubble.
Dead or not dead, we don't know.
And the three that are in the wind are either old tenants and they're really not, they weren't in the building, but they were just on some kind of list because there wasn't a full manifest.
Everybody currently lived in the building and the police had to assemble a bunch of investigation from different sources to figure it out.
The landlord's not the most attentive, let's call that.
So the three might be in the wind or they might be, who knows, but there's two people they think in the rubble.
And purportedly there's pets still in the building, which is, you know, another thing.
And they had sniffer dogs come through from the state task force that came in from Cedar Rapids yesterday and early morning Sunday, early morning Monday.
They scanned the whole building, scanned the rubble, and they said they didn't find anybody.
So the city, on Monday, Memorial Day holiday, scheduled a demolition and hired a contractor and sent out news releases that, Tuesday, we're going to demolish the building.
And that sent many people into some concern.
And so last night, I was up until about midnight getting text messages from everybody.
And the people you know, I think you're on that thread.
Yeah. And everybody's trying to figure out why are they tearing down so quickly?
What's going on? Wait a second.
Aren't there maybe some pets in the building?
Can't we get more information?
And the city is terrible at messaging.
They just did a terrible job.
And then, late last night, a woman appeared on the fourth floor.
She had been hiding under her couch.
And she miraculously had survived and they'd missed her.
So they got her out of the building.
So everyone's like, hey, wait a second.
You missed her. So why are you demolishing the building now?
What's going on? And so this morning, about 7.30, a lot of people started showing up.
And I went down there. I got there about 9 this morning.
And there was probably, I'd say, 300, 400 people down there this morning protesting with signs and Very organic.
Everybody's signs were handmade.
We've all seen protests where they're not organic and they're printed and somebody's putting up to it.
John Bourne, who is a local musician, he said that he had recently done work inside of that building and even in some of the apartments that were the ones that did collapse.
So it does appear that some renovation was done.
I know on that thread that we're on right now, I believe Mike sent us that video breakdown of the individual that pretty astutely noticed that one of the water pipes appears to be untouched almost on the outer edge, giving him the idea that he feels like the failure was somewhere lower.
And then came down. And if you look at the damage of the building, let's bring it up here.
They're definitely working on the lower portion.
It definitely does seem to be in that lower area.
Keep in mind, too, this is a 1914-era building.
And I've learned today from the engineers there on site that the bricks are load-bearing.
So they're not just a skin on the building.
They're actually load-bearing. And there's steel girders throughout it for floor joists and so forth.
And that was state-of-the-art back then.
But when the bricks go, everything else goes in that section.
So it was definitely...
I don't think there was anything other than deferred maintenance.
That's the word. There was no skullduggery that they planned to bomb.
None of that happened. This is a real...
Landlord, you know, didn't fix this.
So anyway, at the news conference, it came forward that there was, in January, the city required him to get a third-party structural engineer report, and that came back that it was structurally sound to occupy, but it needed repairs.
And then they did that.
And then in May, they had another report.
They required another one. They were unclear about the May report.
I talked to the guy, the head of the Department of Neighborhood Housing and Development.
I think that renovation work was done in February, the one I was just discussing.
So it would make sense. That report came out in January.
And I would imagine if something had to be done, unfortunately, the bare minimum was done.
Oh, yeah. Oh, yeah. This guy's doing incremental, you know, repairs.
And so in May, this month, there was work to be done as well.
And it's just sketchy work.
I'm seeing, you know, people have been posting photos on Facebook, and I'm seeing different things.
You know, it's just a bad scene overall.
And it's unfortunate that the city is so poor at messaging.
I witnessed some very sincere people at the fire marshal, fire department, police department.
I mean, nobody wishes this on anybody.
The challenge is that the public feels like they're being, you know, deceived, if you will, because they were just going to tear it down and there still might be people in there.
And national media was there, NBC, ABC, USA Today, NPR, they were all there.
And it's interesting to watch the local media, who I know many of, and the national media and how they operate.
The national media was really trying to channel the energy of the crowd.
They're like, you know, they're trying to One gal from NBC said, Mayor, do you feel like you failed the public?
And they're trying to align with their emotions and all this.
And the city didn't take the bait.
The local media asked technical questions about details like the reports and engineering studies and number of people and the manifests and how do they look up people and just details.
It's very interesting to watch.
Well, I'll tell you what. Right now, obviously, this opens up a multitude, in my opinion, of Of oversight institutions for lawsuits.
That's probably why we're talking about the mayor and obviously code enforcement and things like that.
And I think those reports will be gone over with a fine tooth comb now.
But the question is, will there be criminal charges if in fact we do find out and it is likely we are going to find out there were casualties?
That question was asked, is there going to be a criminal investigation?
And at the beginning of the news conference, Mayor Mike Madsen said that there will be an investigation.
Who's in charge of it is to be determined.
And when that happens, we'll be fully transparent.
And it was kind of cliche to hear that kind of spin, if you will, that, you know, they're hoping that my cynical self says the public officials realize that hopefully most of the populace's memory is so short, they won't remember the investigation a year from now.
And so who's going to investigate?
It's going to be somebody from the state.
And they claim they're going to be very transparent with all the information.
And he said we couldn't determine if there's going to be a criminal indictment or not.
That's pending the investigation.
So it's interesting, really, what the investigation needs to investigate all parties that are involved, the city inspection department, the engineers who wrote the report, you know, and who looked at that report and who signed off on what the third party said.
And there's a nuance here that gets in the weeds, but if the report says, the report could say, it's structurally sound enough to do repairs, or it's structurally sound enough to occupy.
And are those one and the same?
And he couldn't answer that question when I asked him that off camera, you know, outside of the conference.
And he was a little, he's stressed.
These people are very stressed.
And so I gave him some leeway, and I said, I'll get back to you, and I'm going to request those documents and try and get him to see them.
And I think you need to.
This is a national story.
It's one that isn't going away, in my opinion, in my mind.
It speaks to the larger aspect of a crumbling infrastructure throughout this country.
You know, Davenport definitely has its rough edges, but overall, it's a pretty cool little city and well-maintained good people here.
This is just a tragic event.
I guess that my question, my big question would be is how can we have a legitimate investigation
if the first thing that you're trying to do is outright demolish the building?
Now I understand if other people's lives are at risk and obviously you don't want more
of a collapse to happen that isn't controlled and reach out into neighboring buildings and
the streets.
But you certainly don't want more loss of life.
And even if that life is pets, you know, and there have been talk that there are pets there.
I've also seen reports now they've sent in the smallest drones that they can throughout the area to scope out whether or not there may be some holdouts in there.
Is that enough?
Right. Yeah, that's Daryl Cross flying those little drones in there.
Yeah, the...
Putting on a news release on Monday, Memorial Day, late afternoon, that Tuesday the demolishing will begin was a huge mistake.
And they had to backpedal because by the time last night and this morning, a woman appeared who was still in there.
And they couldn't answer the question like, when did you change your mind?
And many people will say they changed their mind because the crowd that had amassed in front of City Hall was getting so excited and upset about the trucks coming in and the machinery coming in and pushing on the fences and so forth that the contractor said, hey, we're not doing this.
So I was not there at that moment.
I've heard reports firsthand from people who were there that I trust that saw that.
And I think that there was a combination of If the crowd wasn't there, it may have started demolition, is what I'm trying to say.
I think that's true. So again, show up, pay attention, be involved.
And there were some shenanigans going anyway.
Everybody has their own little fiefdom they want to claim when they're in a protest environment, and there was plenty of that going on.
But it was good to see a lot of people concerned.
The city, you know, on a scale of 1 to 10, you know, yesterday I would give them a 5, you know.
Today I would give them probably a 7, you know, in terms of handling this.
It's a terrible situation.
Horrible. Fair enough.
Let's move on. Let's talk about some of the stories over at your publication, The River City's Reader.
I absolutely love the cartoon.
I mean, you've been blessed with just an awesome cartoonist.
Tell us about that cartoon and then some of the other stories.
Scroll down a little bit. You can click on that cartoon and it'll come up.
You can put it on the screen. It's the lead commentary piece.
There you go. Yeah. This is Ed Newman's piece.
We collaborated with him on this.
And we've been writing in the reader for many, many months about, you know, why are the children being targeted so hard during this COVID era and other things, as we can see, you know, school board meetings are happening about different education and so forth.
And finally, stuff's coming, you know, transhumanism is happening, you know, the whole gender-affirming care.
We came up with this piece about, you know, our future's secure.
Look, you know, here we have all the people locking down the baby with the VAC schedule and the tuition traps and social media, Common Core, entertainment industry, lockdowns, human trafficking, and gender-affirming care.
So they're all there, you know, handling the future of our children there.
And so much going on with that.
Because you brought that up, I don't really talk about this.
I don't know if I've ever even told you this, Todd.
But on my stepfather's side of the family, now my stepfather and my mother aren't married anymore.
There is a transgender teenager.
So, got the top surgery, girl into a boy.
16 years old.
And I think hormone blockers and that may be as young as 14 and 15.
Now, obviously, this is not something that I would ever approve of.
I've never even had a discussion with someone who I knew and would be my step-uncle.
And when we run into each other, we're pleasant to one another.
But the reason I bring that up is because that person graduated high school today.
And I was scrolling through my Facebook and I saw the photos of what is now...
I mean, honestly, if you look at the picture, you would not be able to tell that this is not a boy.
This is... When she was a girl, she was a larger, taller woman and actually bigger than some of the men.
So the thing that I noticed the most, and I want this to go across to people because I think it's important.
Is, you know, this is high school graduation, and for the vast majority of us, we couldn't wait to get the truck out of high school.
And I would imagine the same is for them.
So this is a time where, no matter what, usually you're pretty joyous and you're happy.
Yeah.
Not a look of joy or happiness on this person's face whatsoever.
They look rotten.
They look upset.
They don't look like they've solved the problems, Todd.
And what's supposed to be- We're excited about the future.
Yeah, we're excited.
Exactly.
And what's supposed to be a momentous occasion on you moving on from a child and now young
adult to adult, it should be a joyous occasion.
And this person, I didn't see any joy in their face, not once.
I clicked through the album, a dozen or so pictures.
And you ask yourself, are these people being sold a lie, being told that somehow doing this is going to save their life or make them happier?
And honestly, the numbers do not show that, Todd.
They show the opposite. There's more and more people coming forward that are being public about their regret for doing this and the challenges for life they're going to have health-wise.
So to each their own, you know, as an adult, I think we're in agreement.
If you want to do something to yourself as an adult, have at it.
But if you, you know, if the school or the educators or anybody outside of the home is encouraging that for a minor, it's wrong.
And that's, I think, the line that people want to draw in the sand, you know, is keep it out of the schools.
Keep it out of the Mindset of these children.
Yeah, and I just want to say that, you know, this began in upstate New York, you know, and this is years ago now.
I know that it's a hot-button issue, but this all started pre-COVID. It absolutely, you know, again, upstate New York, just like the rest of Illinois, is beholden to Chicago.
We're beholden to the New York City politics, 100%.
Oh, yeah, oh, yeah.
This is happening in a lot of places.
And, you know, I actually did a big thing on transhumanism from transgender and Martine Rothblatt in particular.
You know, I often bring up this book right here, Unzipped Genes, Taking Charge of Babymaking in the New Millennium.
Let me read you page 106.
Okay. Okay.
And this is, again, Martine Rothblatt, the most powerful transgender person on the planet, advocate for transhumanism, writes this.
A transsexual Chinese couple want to have hermaphroditic children so they can enjoy the pleasures of both sexes.
The portion of the gene sequence that turns on male sexual characteristics is added to a sperm carrying only an X chromosome.
The resultant child has both male and female reproductive tracts.
And this is the good eugenics.
This is quote-unquote transgenics.
Now, I've often, Todd, brought up the book From Transgender to Transhuman, which is also by Rothblatt.
Is that passage you read stating that that has occurred, or is that a futuristic proposal?
No, that's the future. That's the normal future.
That's the hope. Transsexual Chinese couples.
Yeah, transsexual Chinese couples with genetically modified children.
That's the goal. Got it.
Here we have, from transgender to transhuman, what I was unaware of, that all the way back in 95, Todd, 95, before this book, this is 97, Rothblatt also wrote Apartheid of Sex, a manifesto on the freedom of gender.
And this is where gender identity and this modern gender ideology was truly codified and born.
So this is it.
This is the person. Read their writings and you will find out what they want for the future of humanity, Todd.
And I think we're repeating in part what the Mao revolution did in China, you know, turning the kids against their parents and there's kind of some gender bending going on then and so forth.
So we're repeating history here, right in America.
It's very scary.
It's, you know, it's...
I tell you, where do you even start?
I was listening to your piece the other day, actually today, that you recorded the other day.
You cover a lot of ground. I can't even keep up with you, Jason.
But silence the voices of dissent is one of the goals here.
With the mainstream.
And you talked about, you know, even that one judge who made the ruling that said, we won't even ask the question of whether or not this person was a FBI informant at January 6th.
We're not allowing that into the court, right?
That was the judge's, you know, edict in that measure.
And as you stated, well, if you can't ask the question and you can't get real information, why can't we have the answer if it's...
If you can prove that it's not true, then prove it, right?
So it's really unfortunate.
And the key piece that Kathleen wrote in this month's June issue of the River Cities Reader is titled, Rule of Law and Its Breaches Reflect a Nation's People.
And we get into that in a whole discussion of, you know, These are total breaches of law by these people.
They're disallowing evidence into the courtroom, if you will.
It's not a good thing.
And she writes, the social, economic, and political chaos is a result of textbook tactics.
And she names some textbooks like Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.
Specifically designed to destabilize societies.
You talked about Naomi Wolf citing those 10 steps that she wrote about a while ago about this.
There is a roadmap to this.
This has been going on since Agenda 21.
We've been talking about Agenda 21 for a long time.
This is all part of it. Specifically designed to destabilize societies and replace governments, making the real seditious conspirators those operatives within our government that despise bottom-up governance, preferring the authoritarian, top-down version in which an elite few control all resources and means of production, eliminating competition worldwide for profit and power.
In the 21st century, it is the progressive or post-modernism movement that has infiltrated both political parties, liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans alike, effectively reducing everything to politics via its capture of mainstream social media.
I'm not telling your audience anything they don't know.
We published this in the River Cities Reader here in our independent newspaper in Illinois, Iowa, Quad Cities, because a lot of people don't get this type of information.
They look to us to have this guidepost, if you will, of what's going on.
How do we make sense of what's happening?
We get a lot of positive feedback about this overview that we've taken here.
And she goes on to talk about the two primary things we need to maintain our republic and
maintain our freedoms are individual supremacy and presumption of innocence. And without those,
as bedrock law of the land, there's no protection of rights, no true justice,
therefore allowing progressive globalism to proceed.
Speaking of globalism, I really liked your take on Tulsi Gabbard and her saying, hey, I'm not
part of the World Economic Forum.
At least that's what I heard.
Yeah, yeah, exactly. Listen, man, a lot of people like to come down on Tulsi because she has said some questionable things about torture, for instance, right?
And I don't take the position that torture is okay or that it got us worthwhile or valuable information during the Iraq conflict.
Sorry, that's not something that was real, and we do have to hold her feet to the fire.
Now, at the same time, I do know several people that have worked within her campaigns.
I just had Nico Hausson from the Mi Casa Su Casa Network.
Nico, very much left-leaning.
He's worked over at RT before and apparently just moved to Brazil.
He was very, very close with Tulsi even prior to the run in 2020.
Okay, she basically, I think 2016 is when they got together.
He was one of those people that brought the original Bernie Sanders lawsuit that they had screwed him over from the DNC. And, you know, I trust Nico as somebody that has a good read on people.
He's not even the only one.
The Jackman Brothers.
The comedian duo.
I need to get them back on the broadcast.
But they also worked on her presidential campaign.
In fact, one of her town halls that was on CNN, or I'm sorry, C-SPAN, I believe it was Eric, not Mike, Eric Jackman, that introduced her.
And they spent time with her and her husband, and they even tried to get her on my show, and I'm going to reach out again and try to get her again.
But he's like, look man, Burmish, you gotta understand, these people just don't know.
They don't know about the Pakistani ISI and 9-11.
They don't know that Joey B was meeting with these guys along with Condi Rice and George Tenet and Porter Goss.
They have no idea about these things, Jason.
They haven't watched your films.
That's true. That's all they need to do, and then they would know.
That's why the films are there, right?
You don't have to just listen to Jason Bermas.
I think I do a really good job in my films in a concise fashion of breaking certain things down.
You know, I just was on, like I said to you, off-air the Danny Polishcheck program, and they do comedy.
Him and Ryan Long.
They do the boys cast together.
I was on Low Value Mail this evening.
And, you know, when we're talking about these things, he's like, look, man, I just watched Loose Change Final Cut.
Amazing. You're like, wow. Yeah.
Why don't you go watch my film, Shade the Motion Picture.
It's the 10th anniversary, just happened last month.
We literally put it out 10 years ago.
I go, I got a 20 minute section on Gates and his farming and his geoengineering
and his transhumanism and his boobity boop.
I got it all. I was warning people against that demon then.
And he just kind of chuckled.
He's like, well, I guess I'm just going to have to watch that one too.
So, you know, that's why I make the films.
Because I'm not going to be everybody's cup of tea.
I think... There's a certain adverse reaction by a section of any populace when they see a guy on a microphone or they see a set like this.
In their mind, they already kind of have a direction of where I'm coming from or I'm less credible.
Well, it says red voice, so that's...
Hey man, they wrote the check!
They wrote the check!
And by the way, as of tomorrow, I'm going to be taking over the American Media Periscope Making Sense of the Madness program, where I'm going to be wearing a suit jacket, and it's a very conservative flavor over there, but they're allowing me to be me.
And ask questions that I want to ask and talk about issues that I want to talk about and break down the news that matters and go beyond that right-left paradigm.
And Red Voice has done the same.
And I don't know if that's possible pre-COVID-1984 or pre-Trump.
But it certainly accelerated for me.
Todd, we've known each other now a couple years, and you've seen me take it from a complete and total solo act with basically Rockfin as my financial means, and at times doing very well with that, to now on two different networks, early shows, getting them done, afternoons free, and I still get to be independent and put my stuff out on Rockfin.
It's a win-win for everybody. No, we're very spoiled here in the Quad Cities.
We like it here, you know, despite the challenges.
You know, just jumping around, I made some notes and some things I wanted to talk to you about.
Did you just happen to see David Martin's recent speech at the EU? I know exactly what you're talking about.
I was unaware it was at the EU. It's a 20-plus minute speech.
I have watched quite a few of David Martin's presentations as he has been on the Reawaken America tour that I speak at as well.
And at one of those tours, you know how we're limited there.
You get like the 15-20 minutes.
If you're lucky, you get the half hour.
David Martin wanted more time, so he literally, on top of his presentation, got up extra early to put on while they were setting up an hour-long presentation at like 7 in the morning.
Wow. That guy's dedicated.
I got a lot of respect for David Martin.
He was surgical in his delivery.
And I think what I watched was only eight minutes.
It was very, very well stated.
And he brought up the fact that he had been in this very forum decades before warning them about this very topic of weaponization, of bio-weaponization of weapons.
has all the receipts. It's amazing when he lays it out, it blows your mind. It is
what I shared with a friend of mine that I want to share with you this concept. I
don't know if we can pull this off, but you and I have, and many others that we
know around here, went to those meetings at the library where our own
local Dr. Fauci, Dr. Katz. Dr. Katz!
And you've brought him up and you've played his...
Anyway, he's a total...
Carries water for the whole narrative, the whole CDC. He's got buddies in D.C. He's compromised.
He gets money from the big pharma.
But he's what all the health officials around here listen to.
They just bow down. Oh, whatever Kat says, we have to do.
And I would love to see us get that, just that 8 to 20 minutes of Martin, and go to the same library, post an event, show it, and make sure somehow, I don't know, they won't come, but just imagine what it would be like to have cats in the front row with all of the Scott County, Rock Island County health officials right there watching it.
And we'll hit pause. If you want to refute that, Dr.
Katz, give it to him in advance.
Let him come with his receipts and shoot this stuff down.
I think that would be useful.
I think that would be an interesting exercise.
It's probably fantasy, but...
I would love that for him, Todd.
You know me. Wouldn't that be cool?
I would love an open debate, you know, because there was no open debate when he gave his presentation.
When you brought up your facts, it was always the talking point and the excuse.
For instance, the fact that you weren't counted as vaccinated until 15 days after you had taken that shot.
And then you were only limited to two months after that.
For you not to be vaccinated again unless you took your second shot.
And then a similar thing with the boosters.
He's like, well, do you know why that is?
It takes such and such a time for it to activate.
And I'm like, yeah, but then if you test positive for COVID within those two weeks, you're unvaccinated.
That makes no sense. That's not real.
That's imagination land.
That's Bernaysian talking points.
That's gaming the system on every single level, and he knows it.
He knows it. He knows it.
And we called him out on his, you know, saying that he claimed he had no conflict of interest at the beginning of it.
And then we said, did you get any of the CARES funding for your organization you work for, the blood bank?
Well, yeah. Well, then you're compromised.
Right there and not to mention the fact that it's public information he gets money from the testing agencies as well so um anyway that's just a sidebar throughout there is something interesting um um Yeah, one of the articles in our current issue, too, is by Scott Staffney.
He's an attorney that grew up here in Bettendorf, Iowa, and he's good friends of ours.
And he's been fighting the good fight since mid-2000s, helping people in the mortgage crisis back in that era when they had all those derivatives and all those robo-closings, and all the fraud was going on with people getting their homes foreclosed on.
So much fraud that even the Cook County Sheriff in Illinois, of all places, put a moratorium on any foreclosures because the courts were just fraudulently kicking this stuff out left and right.
Well, he points out that what happened is one of the things that happened that allowed this crisis to flourish, if you will, was that there was a ruling.
And I apologize. I'm just going to read this.
I got this. In 2007, just before the 08 financial collapse, the Supreme Court judicially interpreted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 12B in such a way as to give judges almost absolute power to prevent homeowners' cases from being decided pursuant to a trial by jury.
See Bell Atlantic Court v.
Twombly. The Supreme Court determined in Twombly that to obtain a trial, including a trial by jury, a party must prepare a complaint which would be plausible to a federal judge.
Prior to this time, it was only necessary to establish a possible claim, not one a federal judge found plausible.
So this is a little esoteric thing that, you know, I don't know if you've ever heard of this before, Jason, but this is a nice little nugget that he points out in his essay.
And I mean, it's part of how the breaches of rule of law.
I mean, it's like, where does discretion come in here?
Why can't I have a jury trial?
And so get this. I'll finish this up real quick.
In 2011, criticism of the Supreme Court's supertation of power reinterpreting Rule 8 and 12 had grown to the point where the Federal Advisory Committee on Rules apparently felt it was necessary to ask the Federal Judicial Conference This is significant because even the Federal Judicial Center had to admit the effect of the instantaneous rule change on homeowners and other litigating financial instruments was devastating.
So, anyway.
It just seems like more and more of selective measures on who gets justice, who doesn't.
Who's allowed to bring a case and who isn't.
And we've seen this incrementally happen throughout our country, most notably on the coastlines and D.C. But now it's making its way to middle America.
And I would argue there's always a certain level Of localized corruption.
But now, with the speak and the legalese that you just read, that is expanding more and more and more, Todd, and is giving less and less of a fair constitutional shake to the average citizen.
But it's a benevolent conspiracy, Jason.
It's for your own good. You will own nothing, and you will be happy.
You know, I do want to bring this one up really quick, because I might go, I might not.
You guys got a story, the Laughs in Liberty Tour.
Kennedy, I remember her from MTV, and I still watch her every once in a while on Fox Business.
Jimmy Favela is actually a pretty funny guy.
He's a big contributor there.
You'll see him on Gutfeld.
They're coming to the Adler Theater.
I may go. What are you thinking?
June 3rd, Saturday, this weekend.
We should check that out.
I'm thinking about it, Todd. Maybe we'll go have some cocktails and check out some comedy.
And be social?
Oh my gosh. Imagine that.
And maybe, you know, sneak in a video.
Interview with somebody like Kennedy or Favala, you end up seeing those people on the scene offering to have them go and get a drink.
They're in there. I don't know if Favala, but I know Kennedy's like 50 and a mother at this point.
I always get a kick out of the leather jacket wearing MTV badass that ends up becoming the conservative man.
Talk show host Libertarian.
To her credit, she has people like Scott Horton on the program quite a bit from antiwar.com.
She's better than most, but in a lot of cases, she tows the anti-poot-poot line and a lot of the establishment talking points.
But at the same time, I like comedy.
I like things that are interesting, and I may definitely go check that out.
We need more comedy, that's for sure.
Well, Mr. McGreevy, are there any other stories you'd like to get in here before we let you go?
Well, if you pull up our website real quick, I can point out a couple things out real quick for people.
If you go to the right column there, you'll see we've got the printed edition.
Scroll down a little bit there.
Right there, right there. Up a little higher, man.
Right there's a printed edition right there.
That's on Scribd. So if you want to see what our printed edition looks like, you can go to that.
You can subscribe at our website.
You know, we've been doing our own research since 1993 at the River Cities Reader, which is, you know, not...
It's frowned upon by the mainstream.
Don't do your own research. We've been doing that.
We encourage people to do their own research.
We put links to all of the claims we make in our paper at our website as well.
We have a piece by John and Nisha Whitehead in this issue as well.
Reign in the FBI. Put an end to the FBI's Gestapo tactics.
John and Nisha run the Rutherford Institute in Chicago.
Doing what the ACLU should be doing is what the Rutherford Institute is doing.
We support them at rutherford.org.
Great organization. Excellent essay in there.
You can read. Just go to our website.
You'll see the January 6th coverage you've done there.
You'll see the local elections, power of the sheriffs, all kinds of things there.
Check us out at rcreader.com.
Excellente, my friend.
Hopefully we get together this weekend.
Todd, I love what you do.
I'm glad you came on. I'm glad we talked about the building.
Anything else happens on there, we'll at least do a short segment with Todd to discuss it further.
Please consider supporting him.
Go over to the River Cities Reader website at rcreader.com right now for all the news that the mainstream doesn't see fit to print.
Mr. McGreevy, I thank you once more.
And folks, we'll see you on the flip side.
Hey everybody, check this out.
This is a portion of the premium interview that I did with Jamie Deluxe, who's done just an awesome job with his videos over the years, exposing high-level sex trafficking and this great reset agenda.
So remember, if you do want to see the whole thing, consider coming over to redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.com Try it for a week.
One dollar. Uno delor.
I said something else and everybody was all over me about it.
I don't know Spanish. I'm terrible.
Ten bucks a month or if you really like the broadcast, hey, lock it in for a year.
It's a hundred bucks. You save twenty bucks and you support this broadcast.
So check it out. Myself and Jamie Deluxe.
That's the wild thing is we're seeing more and more and more of that.
And you're wondering, well, can I defend myself in this country?
Is this a country now for criminals?
Certainly one of selective enforcement in many cases, Jamie.
And it's weird, man.
Like, you know, you're in kind of like, not a city area, but you're in like a vacation area, right?
Yeah, like a beach town, beach, you know, it's kind of the city limits, but if you want to consider like big hotels...
Yeah, and like that's, I would say that's mostly suburbia and then a resort town, right?
Yeah. And where you can get stuff done.
A redneck resort, a redneck resort town, yes.
I like it there, man. I do too.
I love it here, man. They filmed Eastbound and Down season three here.
And Kenny Powers fits right in.
I would have hung out with him if he smoked and shit.
No, it absolutely feels like his Baja moment.
You're not wrong. You're not wrong.
It's hot. It's hot here, but that's my only complaint.
Well, if you like beach stuff, great.
In a place like that, I'm not so worried, right?
No matter how liberal it gets.
There's usually law enforcement.
People are there for a good time.
Look, people are there to drink, and there will be some out of control, but overall, under control, right?
And that's not the only place.
For the most part, yeah. I wouldn't really go hang out by myself downtown in the middle of the night anymore, which I did as a kid.
I was walking up and down the boulevard when I was 11, smoking cigarettes and shit with my friends.
I would argue most of those places, and some of them are still Democratic-run, you're pretty safe.
But when you get into the major city areas that are metropolis-like, and then the outskirts of those, whether it be New York City and the boroughs, or Chicago and its quote-unquote suburbs, or San Francisco, LA, it's not the same anymore.
It is amped up.
And I've seen people trying to defend the way it looks, but The law's there.
The prosecution's there.
And I'm telling you, this is not how it used to be.
You saw some lawlessness maybe in the 80s, you know what I mean, in that era of time.
But mainly in New York City.
It really hadn't made its way everywhere yet.
It wasn't like in the Detroits and the Chicagos and the L.A.s.
Now it's just expanded.
And like you said... We've set up a system where the common man or woman can no longer rightfully defend themselves, and the truth may be inverted so heavily that they become the criminal, Jamie.
The word I was thinking of was, it's inverted, and you said it.
So, yeah, they're inverting it all, which is weird because everything's that way.
Boys or girls, girls or boys.
I can go on and on and on.
Everything's ass backwards. It's upside down.
You can see the truth better by standing on your head.
I don't disagree.
And I guess that's kind of maybe a topic we could get into and almost wrap it up with is this trans agenda that is everywhere.
That's crazy. And so many people are trying to say that there are trans kids.
I do not believe that is a thing.
I believe that this is ultimately a transhuman movement, unzipped genes, taking charge of baby making in the new millennium.
And in this book, I believe it's on page 106.
Let's see if we can bring it up. Not only do they advocate for the good eugenics, Jamie, there's good eugenics.
Did you know what that is? You know what they call the good eugenics, bro?
What? Transgenics.
I'm not even kidding. You know who wrote this book?
Who? Martine Rothblatt, the richest, most powerful trans person in the world.
They also wrote, From Transgender to Transhuman, a manifesto on the freedom of form as their follow-up in 2012.
Okay? Okay. Let me read a subsection of this for you.
It's on page 106.
This is part of their transgenics program.
A transsexual Chinese couple want to have hermaphrodite children so that they can enjoy the pleasures of both sexes.
The portion of the gene sequence that turns on male characteristics is added to a sperm carrying only an X chromosome.
The resultant child has both male and female reproductive tracts.
Okay. You want to know how it starts?
Let me just read it. I think we just saw it.
Oh, the book. Let me kick this one off for you.
Okay. This is the forward.
This is the editor's forward.
This is before we even get into it.
They're setting it up for eugenics because the first word in it is eugenics is a word that often elicits the most negative images and rightly so.
After all, it was not long ago that the Nazis tried and failed to extinguish the genes of Jews, gypsies, and others.
And in 1927, this is key, the United States Supreme Court declared in Buck v. Bell
that the eugenic sterilization of the feeble-minded was constitutional.
Check this out.
According to no less a jurisprudential luminary than Oliver Wendell Holmes,
the principle that sustains compulsory vaccination, Jamie, is broad enough to cover the fallopian tubes.
Three generations of imbeciles are enough.
So, in this book...
they're talking about less than 100 years ago, our Supreme Court saying it was okay to vaccinate people to sterilize them.
Yeah. I need people to read this book.
I need people to understand.
Yeah, I never heard of that one.
I need to look it up. That one's harder to find.
In PDF, I'll send you this from transgender to transhuman.
I have that. You know what? We'll bring it up.
I don't know if you've seen the cover to it.
It's a lovely cover, Jamie.
It's fantastic.
Let's see if we can find it right here.
There it is. Boom. Let's do that.
And a little dick-a-dick-a-doo.
Also has their own religion called Terrasim.
Terrasim. Terrasim. Look.
Here we go. From transgender to transhuman.
A Manifesto on the Freedom of Form.
And in this book, by Martine Rothblatt, who also wrote Virtually Human and is an acolyte of Ray Kurzweil, who does the forward on that.
I know that is, yeah. Billions of Sexes is how we start it.
Really? Billions of Sexes?
Billions. Well, how about that?
Let's see if we can find it.
I really... Let's see.
South, right?
That's what we want. Come on, man.
I don't need your...
There it is.
It's right there. It's right in the beginning.
Why did I even have to look? Let's zoom in a little bit more for the audience here.
In the future, labeling people at birth as male or female will be considered just as unfair as South Africa's now abolished practice stamping black or white on people's ID cards.
Jamie. Why?
I mean, an ID, like, it's to identify.
So... I guess identity fluid, they say.
I mean, again, when we're talking about biology...
So, last night, I was actually on the Low Value Mail podcast.
And you may know Danny from his work with Ryan Long...
And the great sketches they've put together, also the podcast they do together, BoyzCast.
So this was just a great opportunity to have a wide-open conversation for almost two hours, take callers, and discuss 9-11 and so much more with somebody who's having a big impact culturally with really funny and relevant material.
Excited for this one.
A lot of people. You've got a lot of people following you all over the internet, sir.
Yeah. You know, I've been grinding, man, a long time.
I bet. Yeah, you're like an OG with this shit.
I was getting into your back catalog, if you will.
I've been just absolutely mainlining various 9-11 videos for the last 24 hours.
So I am... I'm excited to get into this.
I know obviously 9-11 is not your only thing.
You have a lot of stuff. But if you want to just give people who don't know you a little quick primer before we get into it, who you are.
Yeah, I've been doing this now closer to 20 years than 15.
I guess you could say the start of it, at least professionally, was I was one of the guys that did Lose Change, which was this super mega viral video questioning 9-11.
Yeah. And that kind of just took us off, man.
I ended up traveling around the country.
I spoke at Princeton, for God's sakes.
Like, that was the weirdest thing in the world.
What'd they bring you in for?
For 9-11, for the movie.
Just 9-11. Yeah, well, I mean, there were some places that wanted to talk to us just because of the viral nature of it.
And remember, this was a time before...
YouTube completely dominated the arena because Google Video was the competition before it absorbed it.
So it was really through Google Video that allowed you to post something more than 10 minutes that made that thing go mega viral.
Like over 20 languages it got translated into.
It actually ended up airing on the History Channel in Australia and other countries.
So it was kind of a wild ride.
And from that, I made several other documentary films and also, at the time when I was younger, hooked up with Alex Jones.
He produced Loose Change Final Cut for us and I was actually the first person that ever had a show on Infowars all the way back in 2009.
Oh, no way. That's the final cut.
That's the one from 2007, right?
Yes, yes. That's the one from 2007.
So I watched that one today.
Okay. I watched all of that one today.
I'm telling you, I went deep.
I was at the gym on the treadmill, and I was watching it, and it's good stuff.
Yeah. I mean, I have, like, not a...
Like, I know about some...
I watched Lose Change back in the day, but I had not seen it in, like, probably...
I don't know.
When did it come out? 2005? Yeah.
Yeah, 2005 was the second edition, which kind of took the world by storm.
There was a previous one, but that was 60 minutes long.
It hadn't gone viral.
The second edition was pre the 5th anniversary of 9-11.
And through that and touring, we ended up having 10,000 plus people down at ground zero on the 5th anniversary.
I debated the Popular Mechanics guys that year.
And it was some sort of a phenomenon.
It really ended up allowing me to do other films.
In my follow-up in 2008...
Fabled Enemies, which instead of focusing on all the physical anomalies, which is heavy and loose change for sure, this really went through the international intelligence operation and the roles of certain nation states and groups.
And in that film, among a bunch of interviews, we actually have Joe Biden in there admitting to meeting with one of the money men behind 9-11 from the Pakistani ISI and bragging about it.
Really? Yes.
And this was, I remember we got that in the run-up to the 2008 presidential election because he was running then along with a bunch of others.
We put Bill Richardson on the spot.
He was the governor of New Mexico connected to Epstein Island and all that good stuff.
But we got Biden to admit it.
And then the second time that he was confronted, it was actually confronted by Luke Radowski.
A lot of people know him from the Tim Pool podcast.
Yeah, Luke's a friend of mine. Oh, good.
So you know Luke. I was just hanging out with him in Miami like, Oh, you were at the Bitcoin conference.
Yeah, so Luke actually...
No, no, no, like two months ago.
Oh, okay. All right, all right, yeah.
So Luke got him initially at one of the primaries, and then he got him later on, the second time he said it was classified and couldn't talk about it.
He was far from the only person that had met with the head of the Pakistani ISI, but that was really the year that Biden went from just like, you know, an establishment, Delaware, money launderer, criminal...
To the Vice President of the United States.
And kind of continued on with his criminal activity.
Really a neocon for the left.
And now we've got a poopy pants zombie puppet in the office.
Yeah, who knows what he's doing.
He's making moves, though.
He's definitely making some moves.
So, okay, before we get into the whole 9-11 thing, because I think a lot of people, most of their questions relate to the 9-11 with you, but you obviously are into tons of different stuff.
But you tweeted at me yesterday about all this Elon Musk business, and that certainly...
And we were doing it on his website, funny enough.
We were using his website, so we're probably on a list somewhere right now.
Hopefully it's a good thing, but...
So what's the scoop on Elon?
So here's the deal, man.
A lot of people want to aggrandize him as a hero at this point because he said the basics.
I mean, if you think about how low the bar is right now, that freedom of speech is the bar, right?
Not censoring things you call...
Misinformation, disinformation, they've got their new terminology of malinformation, which is also in their white papers, which essentially means information that harms the great narrative or the establishment narrative.
And that's a big problem. That's not truth.
Elon Musk is the largest defense contractor in the country.
Elon Musk, I mean, we're not going to the moon or Mars with SpaceX.
That's not what's going on.
What's actually going on is Starlink is kind of this Trojan horse civilian system that also puts up what are known as blackjack satellites.
So these are the weaponized DARPA satellites that integrate with Starlink, which the DoD also has a backdoor into.
And you'll never guess where the highest concentration of those dishes that control those satellites are.
Take a guess. The highest concentration of those on Russia?
Actually, Ukraine, because that's what's arming them.
So those are also what's hooking into the Ghost and Sidewinder missiles.
So he's the largest defense contractor.
He's putting up Starlink.
He's putting up Blackjack.
On top of that, do you know that he made more money than anybody else during the COVID-1984 nightmare?
Well, you're saying just because of Tesla's stock?
So, he actually increased his net worth 600% over every other billionaire you can imagine, from Bill Gates to Sergey Brin to Warren Buffett.
I think they have the list here. Maybe they don't own this one.
But he dominated.
Yeah, yeah. Well, Tesla's stock went up a lot.
Well, one of the reasons that happened is because they printed the shots.
The ones that he kind of speaks out against.
Without Elon Musk, they don't get printed up because they're bi-owned.
Tesla did? Yeah. Yes, dude.
Tesla's RNA vaccine printer for CureVac is going to be an important product for the world.
So after the efficacy plunged, so did the CureVac stock.
But he made a killing in the meantime.
I've never heard of this CureVac thing. Yeah, again, people have to understand.
I don't want to get kicked off of YouTube, so I'm going to be very careful here.
Appreciate you. Absolutely.
This is a new platform, and by new, I mean new in that it was commercialized.
DARPA actually partnered with Moderna, it's on their own website, in 2013 for their mRNA project.
They got a $25 million grant, and it's called the ADEPT Protect Program.
Okay, so that's just a platform.
DARPA then in turn, once it got the viral information, sequenced it within three days and then started printing these things up through Tesla and CureVac.
And that's how all of these things made it out the door via Operation Warp Speed to companies like Moderna, AstraZeneca, and others, which had also teamed up with Moderna and DARPA in their mRNA program, along with The Institute Pastor, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to no surprise, BARDA, and many others.
Again, on their own website.
Now, I have a question, actually, because you just brought up Bill and Melinda Gates.
So, I never realized, like, Bill Gates pretty much became a supervillain in the last three years.
For the most part.
Sure. Like, publicly, where he's like, people are like, yeah, that Bill Gates is no good.
He was, before that, it wasn't really that.
Were you, like, were you on to him for a while?
Well, if you watched my film, Shade the Motion Picture, which is now a decade old as of April.
No, I didn't get a chance to. That was, I just did not have all the time today.
Got a 20-minute section.
20-minute section on Bill Gates, on the farming, on the GMO, on the weather modification, and on the boopity-boop, my friend.
And not just him, but other people he's associated with, such as Warren Buffett and another key player that doesn't get played up as much, but certainly has a seat at the table, Peter Thiel.
Yeah. So what's up with Peter Thiel?
What isn't up with Peter Thiel?
Are you aware of what just...
Well, I know he is.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. So are you aware of the Bilderberg meeting that just went on a week and a half ago?
So he's a steering member.
Another great clip from Luke Radowski.
Luke Radowski, I think it was back in 2016, actually got Thiel on the record on Bilderberg.
And he basically said, hey, we should be able to meet in private.
It was the Nazis that wouldn't want us to meet in private.
And I'm like, whoa, that's a little weird.
But Thiel is also very much on this transhuman line, which we didn't even mention with Musk.
Musk is also promoting brain chips, which is DARPA tech from 50 years ago.