All Episodes
May 28, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
58:54
Is Ai A Lie With A Google Whistleblower
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey everybody, Jason Bermas here.
And this one's really going to be kind of an exciting conversation for me because...
So many people right now are obviously familiar with the Twitter files and narrative control and, of course, artificial intelligence now making its way into that.
And really, artificial intelligence isn't artificial intelligence the way they're telling you.
It's not the absolute truth.
It always has human programmers.
So why wouldn't we get a human programmer who was inside the demon...
Google, back in the day, saw the narrative control, came to the media, they said, we're not interested.
It had to be Project Veritas that put those documents out.
And one in particular that kind of hit home to me was on We Are Change.
Because as you know, I've known Luke Radowski from before he created We Are Change.
I've worked with We Are Change.
And there was an exchange out there...
That had come forward just in, I believe it was Wikipedia.
Whether or not, to credit We Are Change, with footage they had shot.
Because they were the source material.
That's how banned they were as a news organization.
So this isn't new.
AI is an extension of that.
Google was exposed years ago, and it was in large part to this gentleman right here, Zach Voorhees.
If you don't know about Zach Voorhees, you need to.
You can go to zachvoorhees.com.
And... You've gone around the country now and spoken about this.
You've been on the inside.
You still write code.
I'm sure you see it in your dreams, Zach.
First of all, explain to my audience why you came forward.
What your viewpoint was before you saw these internal documents and was kind of taken aback.
And then I want to bring us into the narrative control of today and the Twitter files and whether you think that's kind of an extension of what's going on everywhere across the board in social media and big tech.
Zach, you have the floor. Yeah, well, thank you, Jason, for having me on back again to talk to your audience about AI and all the crazy stuff that's happening with that.
To answer your question, look, I used to be a very ideological person, and I joined Google because I thought that they represented sort of like a Turning point in corporate sort of like ethics, you know, organize the world's information, make it universally accessible and useful.
Like, yes. I 100% agreed with all those different points.
Don't be evil.
Remember that? Don't be evil.
Like literally their logo.
Right? And it wasn't like just something that they said in passing.
It was something that they said when they went public with their company, right?
And they had this like constitution.
Don't be evil. Organize the world's information and make it universally accessible.
I had an opportunity to join Palantir right about the same time that I got hired at Google.
I would have made a lot more money with Palantir given their stock investment, but I didn't agree with what Palantir was doing.
They're making this shadow social media network that catalogs every single person in the country.
And, you know, to my surprise, in 2016, during the Great Weirding, when Donald Trump got elected, they pretty much just took all that sort of, like, ethos and just threw it out the window.
And I was, you know, I'm kind of a curious person.
I'm trying to figure out, like, what the heck is going on?
And I dig in, and then I discover that they're unleashing this AI governance program, this censorship regime called Machine Learning Fairness.
And I was like, this is against every single thing that they've publicly said as a company.
How can you have universal access to information if there's an AI agent that's censoring what it is that you can see, what it is that you can read on YouTube, on Google search, on news?
How can we have a free and clear election if we don't have access to the information?
It took a while for me to convince myself that the scope of this project was as large as it was.
But reading through 950 pages of this stuff online, I came to the conclusion that this was an existential threat, not only to the United States, but for the rest of the world.
I knew that Google, I mean, Google is pretty clear that they were going to prevent the next Trump situation.
And so what I wanted to do was I wanted to get out in front of that and say, look, everyone, this is what they're planning on doing.
Project Veritas actually did a sting operation with the documents that I, you know, presented them.
And they actually got Jen and I to say, you know, that we're going to stop the next Trump situation.
And so it was like, ta-da, here you go, everyone.
This is all the proof that you need that this is actually going to happen.
And then that's exactly what happened, right?
Like the Hunter Biden laptop came out and, you know, 50 CIA agents, intelligence officers signed on saying that it was a Russian disinformation, right?
YouTube purged the people that were talking about it.
Right?
And I actually represent- Hold on, before you even get there, let's also talk about
how they had been ramping up their censorship.
There was more and more demonetization and outright taking down of channels.
All of a sudden their terms of service was continually changing.
Then they algorithmically went in and basically said, these are authoritative and qualitative
sources.
These are not.
The shadow banning began within the algorithm, again, programmed by people.
And when you talk about Trump, Eric Caramella, since we're not on YouTube on this, and if
we are, we'll call him Eric A Caramello Bar.
You weren't allowed to say that name on YouTube, and I tested the waters.
And the very first censorship that we got on the YouTube channel, and I want to make this extremely clear, I had my channel since 2007.
We're talking about almost 3,000 videos up there.
At the time, it was probably half that, about 1,500.
And it was me just playing Louis Gomer, a member of Congress, in the house.
In the house.
Saying that he would like certain people to testify.
Not pointing out the significance of Erica Caramello Barr.
But saying the name twice.
And I did replay it.
I didn't say anything about it.
That video, to this day, they let it stay, but they blocked it in every country.
So it's blocked globally.
In fact, we might bring that up as we talk to Zach just to show the receipts, folks.
That is blocked globally.
So that was the first big test.
Will you let us – and they also censored Rand Paul when he mentioned that same name.
There was a certain name you couldn't mention because this is the big bad whistleblower to get
Trump impeached. And that just kind of accentuates what you said. Even before the
Hunter Biden laptop, even before the COVID 1984 nightmare, they had mechanisms in place,
obviously YouTube being an extension of Google, that they put into Playzac.
Right.
And that censorship umbrella was, you know, machine learning fairness.
And, you know, basically, true information became a source of unfairness, which this thing essentially eliminated from being able to be viewed, right?
Caramello, for example.
It's funny because they always kind of backdoor it with this really nice, like, oh, it's for fairness.
And if you're against fairness, then you're a bad person, right?
And so then people say, oh, well, I'm for fairness and whatever.
And so it comes in and then all of a sudden they flip the switch during a crisis point and then boom, a different person's in office, right?
And that's essentially what happened.
And so It was a really big media event when it came out.
I remember that because there was two events.
If you remember June, I came out anonymously and Project Veritas released three documents.
And that pretty much was what everyone was talking about for like a week.
And then I came out again in August after I got raided.
And then it became another news item.
Now, the mainstream media was like, oh, this is a nothing burger.
Right? Which is insane to me.
I've had leptists that were friends that said, I took a look at your documents and there was nothing there.
I'm actually glad that you released them.
And I was just like, What alternate reality are you living in where you think that this is a good idea?
Have you seen the blacklists?
It's crazy because I came out there in 2019 and sort of like one of the side stories that I kind of pushed but not that much was like, yeah, these mass terror attacks, I don't know if I can say this with level of censorship, but you can edit it out later if that's okay.
We're not editing anything out.
I made loose change, brother.
Look, I was like, these false flag...
Mass attacks are false flag events, and the FBI or intelligence services on the inside of Google are censoring all of the information that people would need to find the evidence.
You know, like, you know, Robbie Cole, Robbie Parker, like, forgets his lines.
Well, I'll tell you what.
I'm going to disagree with you.
I'm just saying this right now, because...
At the time, I had just left InfoWars, right?
Right. And I was still in contact with them a lot.
I also downloaded everything that was available one year after from the event.
And I'm going to tell you right now, you can watch my videos on it, but I believe not only that everybody died there, but people were targeted.
And the evidence does show when you look at who got shot up, which teachers died, their cars were shot up.
More than likely, multiple people.
The first reports were of clergy members coming in, and I show the news report of that.
Also, three doors open, black robes, nuns on the scene first.
They actually chased a van, and you can listen to the audio.
The police chased a van where supposedly people were dressed up like nuns, a purple van that was headed towards Danbury, Connecticut.
Towards the airport.
And all this absolutely happened, by the way.
On top of that, I went through all the photographic evidence that they had inside the Lanza home.
There's a lot of questions. I'm not saying that.
But I think a lot of it got muddied.
And that Parker thing, God knows.
Obviously, you have to be really careful with that aspect of it.
But I watched the Wayne Carver.
He was the mortician.
And a lot of people had edited that out to make it look like he was laughing and stuff about what he had just seen.
When you watch the whole thing, this is just a really uncomfortable dude for an hour and a half.
I think in the surreal space that he just saw a bunch of dead kids...
Look, I'm not making any statements about whether Sandy Hooker happened or not.
What I'm saying is that there is an intelligence effort to block people from finding evidence that a lot of these mass terror attacks are actually false flag events being orchestrated by the intelligence services.
Well, let's look at just 9-11 right now.
Right? Like, for instance, it's 20 plus years later and they're now finally talking about, they're whispering about the CIA-FBI connection to Khalid Al-Madar.
Well, we could go back to even pre-2019, but I do want to show this Louis Gomer thing in a second because it is in 2019.
It happens, by the way. With the case of the hijackers and all these things about them being in an FBI informant's home and then the CIA recruited them.
First of all, I made a film in 2008 where all this stuff was in there and the guy that was running the Saudi Arabian embassy, which was a CIA consulate sending these guys over, blew the whistle on these guys.
Then, like I said, in 2018, there are a thing called the Dark Overlord files.
I'm not sure if you're familiar with those.
But basically, there are five layers of encrypted files that they were trying to get a Bitcoin million-dollar ransom on.
And they gave up the keys for the first three.
And one of the really interesting things that they had in there was the testimony of James Woods, who had been on a plane that had a mock run of the hijacking with identified hijackers on it.
And he, the pilot, and the stewardess, this is in August of 2001, on Flight 11, by the way, all filed reports.
Everybody filed a report, nothing was done.
Khalid Al-Madar, this CIA guy, happens to be one of them.
He's not even supposed to be on Flight 11 or know the other hijackers.
That's not even his cell.
He's the lead hijacker on 77.
So try finding that on Google right now.
It's going to be tough. I'm in complete agreement with you.
For instance, also, TMZ just did their documentary on United 23, the other plane.
The other plane? There were 20-plus hijackings that day.
Bomb reports, the whole nine.
They found weapons on other planes.
I documented United 23, again, in my film, Fabled Enemies, start to finish.
In fact, in the 9-11 hearings, Richard Myers and several others acknowledged that there were many other phantoms that day.
Those are fake hijackings that were actually implemented through Cheyenne Mountain.
All documented. And it is harder and harder to find those things.
But... For instance, like I said, the scary thing to me was this change, and we're going to look at the date here.
This is 12-14-2009.
That's when YouTube hits me up and tells me that, let's see, great news.
We've determined it's suitable for, what is it, all audience?
Is this a different video?
Don't tell me that this is a different one.
Here it is right here. Because I can't, they said it's suitable for all audiences.
It's private and locked.
I'm in the back end right now.
I can't click on it and change it.
Did I get a second email from that one?
Let's see. Louie says the forbidden words.
That is so bizarre.
Because it says it's suitable for all...
Oh, this is the demonetization.
Not when they blocked it.
So they re-monetized it, and then they blocked it again.
So, I mean, that's the world we live in.
You can't have somebody point out someone who set Trump up.
Let's be honest. That person set Trump up.
I believe that was impeachment one before the perfect phone call, right?
Mm-hmm. It's incredible, Zach.
And what complicates this is that it seems that the intelligence service is also putting out fake information as noise.
And sort of the degrading part about this is that it actually justifies a lot of the censorship because they're like, well, there's a lot of fake information out there.
Like I saw this in the internal documents.
They're like, oh, a bunch of people are saying that some FBI agent died around Hillary Clinton.
Now, a lot of people have died around Hillary Clinton, but the information that they were
presenting was actually some sort of fringe stuff that wasn't true.
But it was so close that the real truth could be hit as collateral on the justification
that we're actually trying to get rid of the fake news.
And so this is, you know, it's funny.
It's like you say that there was a bunch of hijackings that day.
Well, the interesting thing about that, those hijackings is that, you know, it injects noise so that people are overloaded with information and they can't figure out like the media, they can't make heads or tails on what's going on.
No, it's exactly right. It's the overload.
I love that you talk about that.
For instance, when you do have subjects that have to be explored, what they do is they try to create straw men through these arguments.
In other words, putting out something that they know people will bite on and that's false.
And I think that we saw that, obviously, in the Hillary email leaks with James Aliphantis, who, look, I'm not accusing James Aliphantis of anything.
He had Antinous as his Instagram avatar.
That's the Greek god of pedophilia, for those that don't know.
He had that as his avatar.
I don't know if that's cool or not.
There were some very other questionable things there.
Someone came in, and you can actually watch Alephantis on camera.
I don't know if you've ever seen this footage.
But at the shooting...
He actually takes the media into the closet to show them the shock computer which is a computer tower with a tiny bullet hole through the case.
Zach, you're a forensic scientist.
Or I would say computer forensic scientist.
In other words, you know how to restore a hard drive.
I've got hard drives stacked all over.
They recovered information from hard drives that were in the World Trade Center.
That literally, you only had maybe some magnetic strips on.
The hard drive was fully intact in this computer, and the bullet did not go through it.
And I'm just sitting there going through it.
It was destroyed! They couldn't look at the computer!
And they put it on camera.
I mean, but then you start getting into things like adrenochrome, which I'm not saying is real, but in the context of putting it with them or that Hillary is trafficking people out of a pizza parlor.
Again, muddying the waters.
You had the frazzled drip hoax that was going around.
You muddy it so much that you forget the fact that John Podesta was in a group email where three children were named and aged.
For entertainment in a hot tub for sure on a farm.
Yeah, but could that be disinfo?
Because that's what launched the entire censorship.
Literally, Pizzagate launched the entire censorship initiative at YouTube.
And that was the spark.
And most people don't know that inside story.
And I'm wondering, well, that kind of fits together really perfectly.
Was that planned? Well, I'll tell you what.
I'm not sure if you've been following the Makani case.
Did you follow that case?
No, I haven't. What about it?
Oh, see, that's the whole thing, bro.
What? So, in case you didn't know, now we're going to have a whole fun conversation.
So you're not wrong.
Right.
Right. The real Russian bots were Microchip and the gang.
And Ricky Vaughn, who is Justin McConaughey.
Now, everybody in the alternative conservative media got that story completely wrong.
It was not about a meme at all.
That's not what they got.
That was the network that pumped Pizzagate and pumped the memes.
They're the Russian bot network.
In fact, there's a great article by BuzzFeed of all places...
Okay, and you've got to read it.
And I'm going to tell you more about microchip because you won't even believe what they let them get away with in that McConaughey case.
This is what's really going to solidify this.
So it's called Nevermind the Russians Meet the Bot King Who Helps Trump Win Twitter.
So this is the network, bro.
This is microchip.
And that's 2017?
2017, but it's going to get better.
Wait, I want you to read this quote.
Because this is so much better.
When you find out what they just used microchip for, you're not going to believe it.
Okay, so let's just type in hysteria quick.
He goes, this is in the article.
Indeed, in a national atmosphere charged by unproven accusations about a massive network of Russian social media influence, the story of how microchip helped build the most notorious pro-Trump Twitter network seems almost mundane.
Less a technologically daunting intelligence operation than a clever patchworking of tools nearly any computer literate person could manage.
It also suggests some of the current Russian Trump bot hysteria may be well hysteria.
It's not, it's all us.
Not the Russians, Microchip said.
And we're not going to stop.
And he says, I've never seen any evidence that there are Russians out there at all.
Okay? Now you have that GRU paper.
Obviously, I've read it.
There's no basis in fact.
They let Microchip testify against McConaughey as Microchip without giving up his identification, revealing that he's been working with the FBI since 2018.
So in other words, that's the network that started in 2016.
He's been working with the FBI as an informant since before you went public, okay?
And they still arrested him, which he pled to, okay?
Unspecified charges in 2021.
So he worked with them.
They still charged him in 2021.
We don't know what they charged him with.
And he got to testify against Makani, who was Ricky Vaughn.
Okay, that's why Ricky Vaughn went to jail.
That meme, they had actually set up a dummy number so that if you actually texted it in, you got a reply.
That's one of the things they hooked him up.
So I'm sure there were all sorts of cases of fraud.
Of, I would say, impersonating people because they had all those sock accounts and puppets.
Now, the major interesting thing about Microchip, Zach, is that he claimed that he started Q with the DEF CON crowd.
In fact, he was Posobiec's inside guy on that OAN report.
And this is all the way back in 2018 when he had flip-fed.
And in the internal documents on the McConaughey case, they talk about MAGA 3X and those involved there, including Stone, Cernovich, and others.
So they're trying to get the network.
What does it say about them? Well, basically, what I see in that is the extension of it.
This is the troll network.
And I do believe that, actually, I was supposed to have Microchip on my show.
In 2018. Okay, and again, no one's ever identified who he is.
I'm still trying to figure out who he is.
There's some people out there who think that he may be multiple people.
It's a gag. And that might be true because I had James Brower, another one of the shit posters in this network, and Defango on.
And I'm not sure if you're aware any of these guys trust no one.
They're all shit posters and liars and they get off on them.
Okay? But I think they were with others.
I'm not even going to name one of the guys because he's such a...
Piece of shit in my opinion.
But Cicada 3301, Shadowbox, think that crew.
So that's the network that actually...
Can we talk more about Cicada 3301?
Because the thing is that I saw their little puzzles that they had prior to the whole Q thing.
And I was just like, man, this could be really done as a damaging thing to basically take a LARP-y puzzle and put it into the public space.
Well, that's the origins of Q, bro.
Like, basically, it was those puzzle-jackers that worked it, and then even if they...
Even if the person that says they started...
Because I don't like to mention this person, because some of the things that...
I've seen behind the scenes, you know, I would imagine that the FBI might have contacted him at some point because he's all in legal trouble again and again and again and again.
All these guys are, you know?
Defango's about to go to court again because Flynn's suing a guy that Defango influenced.
These guys are poison. You know what I'm saying?
But the kind of poison that would start this network and the kind of poison that FBI would want to get involved in and then call them Russians because they don't want people to realize how effective they can be just from their couch and a little know-how, right?
And they want to censor the narrative.
I'm not defending any of these people.
I'm just pointing out reality, right?
And there was a lot, you know, as well as everybody, there was a bunch of grifting going on.
And there still is a lot of grifting going on with, you know, this extension of the Q and nonsense.
But what I'm telling you is, I think the evidence is in that microchip was obviously involved, at least in the beginning.
You know, the documentary evidence that later on, obviously, the Watkins control most of it and all that other stuff.
Sure. You know what I mean? I think it was a group grift.
But this network started it.
They've gone after it.
They've flipped a lot of people.
If this guy was working with the FBI for how long, right?
Three years, four years, five years before he flipped on another guy.
God knows. And the extension is, just with the media, is they'd like to bring it to Flynn.
Because Flynn did that oath one time.
I don't believe Flynn had anything to do with it.
I think that Flynn maybe leaned into a little, just like Trump did, prior to the 2020 election.
I mean, the guy did psyops operations in Africa in 22 different countries.
Like, what are the chances that he's also sort of like the center point of the QAnon thing?
I don't think he is. That's a really interesting coincidence that I would love someone to explore more.
Listen, my boy Robbie Martin, he is a big critic of Flynn.
And I just, I haven't seen the direct evidence.
You're not wrong. I mean, I've had short private conversations.
Well, his brother got promoted to Admiral under Biden.
Like, as soon as Biden took office...
Mm-hmm. Flynn's brother got put, like, Admiral of the Navy.
Yeah. And I was like, wait a minute. But at the same time, it was actually Biden that figured out the Logan Act.
Bro, you know how long I was talking about the Logan Act for before they used it against Flynn?
A long time. A long time.
Because Bilderberg, which is coming up next weekend in Lisbon, Portugal, by the way, that's where we should be using the Logan Act with government officials.
You know what I mean? Like, Kyrsten Sinema.
All of a sudden comes out of nowhere last year after meeting at the Bilderberg, one of the only U.S. politicians.
She's an independent now.
And she's getting press.
It's just so damn obvious, man.
And I guess, you know, we've said a lot about microchip, that network, narrative control.
It's been used to demonize Assange, who's not even a citizen and somehow is being charged with the Espionage Act.
I believe that they're trying to extend that narrative now.
To even the President of the United States.
I believe Trump is about to be charged with criminal charges, one way or another, before this election to try to encompass him, at least in a criminal case.
Yes? Yeah.
Well, and the thing is, is that they want to get them on some sort of insurrection so that they can take them off the ballot in the swing states.
And so, you know, you got the left putting them on CNN. And I think it's a really big Pied Piper event that's leading everyone to a trap because you've got this whole mechanism that's going forward.
It's not going to stop. It's going to continue for the next year.
And I think that it's going to conclude in October.
And then from those indictments or those criminal charges, that's going to give the legal impetus for these swing states to be like, oh, we're taking Trump off the ballot.
And that's going to cause maximum amount of disruption, right?
And so, you know, everyone's like, oh, Trump, Trump, Trump.
And I'm just sitting there going, yeah, this is an intelligence operation.
And we're all being led into a giant trap with this whole thing so that Biden can get, you know, an extra four years.
Well, let's look at it this way, man.
And this is how I'm looking at it.
He couldn't have been at a greater position of strength in 2020, being the president of the mother trucking United States, getting 12 million more votes than he did the first time, in order to legitimize that election even prior.
Not allow it to get out of control with the mail-in ballots and the state's bullshit.
All that. Quite frankly, as soon as he got in, he should have been trying to disband the machines.
Because the machines are a problem.
They're always a problem. Forget about just mail-in ballots.
Forget about voter ID. We should have hand-fucking-counts.
And the thing is, it's great.
He doesn't even have to go out and ban it.
All he has to do is start an investigation at the federal level and watch the media freak the...
And everyone's going to be like, why is the media freaking out over a federal audit of these election machines and generating these reports?
And then build up the narrative so that you can ban them, you know, two years later.
Again, I think it's an executive order once you find any kind of irregularities, period.
And you should be able to do that.
And there's already been proven irregularities.
And what everybody in the media ignored, and Bill Barr ignored when he talked about it.
You know, Bill Barr. Oh, Bill Barr.
Yeah. Was the fact that, yeah, they talked about mail-in ballots being a scam.
That was the big talking point.
But they also said the machines aren't audited.
And all that Carter suggested, by the way, was a 3% audit, random audit, which we don't even have.
Think about that. We don't even have a 3% audit of the machines.
That means we don't have an audit at all.
I think 3% is low.
I think you want a 10% to 30% audit.
Right. I mean, because they're that corrupt.
So he couldn't have come in a bigger position as well.
And now everything's so complex that you need a degree in forensic machine ballot auditing just to be able to do the audit at all, where before it was like you get any guy off the street and you're like, count ballots, right?
And you know what? We could use technology, Zach, to empower us.
And I've always said this. This is how you do it.
It's very simple. You go in, you mark it up, you put it into a sleeve that takes away your information you've already registered there.
Then you use technology to empower human beings.
How do you do that? You have a webcam above all the ballots that are being counted by hand by two people that are actually checking them and the camera on the ballots.
So there's actually a ticker and a camera as they do it that can be audited later by the public 100%.
And yeah, you're going to throw some away.
That is the fairest way I can absolutely...
The ballots don't leave.
The stream doesn't stop.
The people get tired.
You know what you do? You bring in other people.
You bring in the human element and they constantly want to take away the human element and that's what this AI is.
Before we get into the programs and all those other things, I want to talk about this really briefly with you because I think it's really important.
The narrative was that once Elon Musk came in, he was going to give the source code up.
But the truth is that it leaked just before that.
And actually, Twitter took legal action against the leakers on GitHub.
So now, later on...
It becomes open source.
Literally, you know, he announced it's going to become open source, but then it leaks and they sue.
So you wonder what they put out there.
Then we find out that the code here reveals the U.S. government can still intervene with the recommendation algorithm after the fact.
And, of course, we know Elle Muskerdew, where is it, right here, just had this crazy woman become the CEO of Twitter.
Right, the WF chairman.
Hey everybody, Lindy Yaccarino here.
Class of 1980, we're not here to talk about that.
We are here to talk about masking up or packing up.
I promise you, we're doing good so far.
Just keep your distance, get your hands washed often, get tested often, and wear your mask.
Tests don't work. Wear your mask.
Be in fear. Wash your hands.
I mean, it's funny. There's some things that your audience may not notice, but she looks actually vaccine injured because she's got a crooked smile and some minor paralysis on the same side of her face with her eye, which is common when you've got nerve inflammation caused by these vaccines, which agitate the immune system and sensitize them to stuff.
And so it's funny, it's like you got this psyop vaccine injured person, probably vaccine injured person, in my opinion, you know, talking about everyone having to mask up and take in these globalist poisons.
And now this is going to be the new CEO. And, you know, Elon's trying to tell us, oh, don't worry, we're going to not have any censorship.
It's like, yeah, right. Like there's already censorship.
It's just all a bunch of lies.
Exactly. Listen, the Twitter files only went back a few years.
I want to see when they went public, really.
From the time that they went public as a corporate entity, bare minimum.
And you really want to see what infrastructure was in place before that.
Because there was obviously censorship.
I've had my Twitter, I think, since 2010 or 11.
I have to kick, scream and crawl to get that thing elevated.
My analytics, listen, I just paid for the blue check mark, not because I wanted to,
but because they took away media studio and I couldn't stream my show there anymore.
So I literally now have to pay and I can only put it in in one hour increments
after the fact, still can't stream.
You know, that was the only way around that.
And now they're saying, and I hope it's true, you know, with Tucker Carlson coming over
and you know, he's not perfect, but he was the last guy in mainstream media
telling any semblance of the truth.
If he comes over and it becomes more like a YouTube platform
and he's already said this woman is gonna make it into X, whatever that means, the everything app.
This may be the YouTube of 2013 to 18 where you could still make money on it.
I'd love to see that happen.
Personally... I don't believe in leprechauns and unicorns.
I'm not sure it's going to happen.
What are your thoughts on that?
Especially given the fact that the FBI can already intervene with the algorithm.
We have programs like Signature Reduction, which is the secret military doing the same exact thing.
The CIA also obviously involved from Mockingbird on.
Can we get a fair shake in the algorithm and quote-unquote Artificial Intelligence Act?
No, absolutely not.
We're on a one-way path towards a really different future than the past that we were used to.
And people are like, why is this QAnon thing happening?
Why is the media lying?
Why is everything so weird?
And the reason is that we're entering into a very special period of time.
And what's happening is that we're coming into the age of artificial intelligence.
And what's happening is that there is a group of insiders, some globalists that run the banks, run the media, et cetera.
And they are dipping both hands into Pandora's box, and they're grasping firmly, and they're taking whatever's inside out, and they're going to use it for themselves.
Now, the general public doesn't You know, that's not the media narrative right now, because what the media narrative is, is, oh my god, there's this Cambrian explosion of innovation happening in the AI space, right?
Like, what's interesting about AI is that it's essentially programmable through natural language.
So you can, like, go and say, generate me a poem about Jason Bermas and his show and being censored on YouTube, and it will make, like, a rhyming poem, like, immediately, just like that.
And people are generating images, people are generating video.
And so what this allows the elites to do is it allows them to roll out AI on a grand scale, similar to what they did with crypto, right?
Oh my God, all these people are getting rich, right?
All of a sudden crypto goes everywhere and it gets everyone familiar with the thing before the rug gets pulled.
The rug pull with AI is going to come, but right now we're in this interesting state where it's rolling out, it's making people more productive.
On a personal level, it's very beneficial to the individual to use it.
Right now, socially, it's a different story, especially in the next five years when the rug pull comes and they're like, oh, AI is too dangerous.
We need to start shutting things down.
And that's when things are going to get sort of into a dystopian chapter, right?
So, for example, the Chinese view of the West and what led up to the current state of things is going to be different than what history books teach.
And so they're going to feed in different data to the AIs than the West is going to feed into their AIs.
And so what happens if you get a Chinese AI into a Lincoln-Douglas debate with a Western AI? And the Western AI is saying, oh, certain things are not true.
And then the Chinese AI is saying, oh, absolutely, it's true.
Here's all the books and citations and da-da-da-da-da.
And that's going to be destabilizing to our society.
So what I believe is that the way that they're going to counter this is that they're going to...
They're going to chop off the open internet access.
This whole global internet infrastructure is already dead.
We're going to erect firewalls between us and the other regional powers, Russia, China, probably also the European Union.
Interesting. And the VPN is not going to get you in or it will and they're going to make it illegal.
They're going to make it illegal and they're going to make it tough.
I think they'll make it like really illegal with like threats of jail time, but they won't actually act on it.
What they'll do instead is that they'll just say, oh, well, you're doing something illegal, which gave the FBI justification to hack into your phone and delete it for you.
Right. But hey, you're not going to get in trouble.
That's typically how it's going to work.
Things are going to get kind of scary until a new equilibrium is achieved.
Which I think will happen once, you know, essentially this group of insiders formally takes physical control.
Because right now they've got influence, right?
Control the money, supply, influence.
But at some point they're going to go to actually physical control where it doesn't even matter if you know the truth because you're not going to be able to vote.
And if you rebel, they've got all the drone guns, right?
What are you going to do, right?
Nothing. Well, automation.
But that's the other thing about AI is that people sit there and they talk about the driverless cars and trucks.
What a lot of people aren't talking about is the big reason that this Writers Guild is striking right now is because they want the use of AI regulated so their jobs aren't taken.
And they don't even want to have that conversation.
There are a lot of jobs that are going to simply be automated out through AI via HR and other means because they can do it quicker and more efficiently.
And a lot of people just do shitty busy work because they got a mass comm degree, bro.
I hate to tell everybody, but your busy work day that you've complained about for years that was totally unfulfilling is going to be gone in most cases.
Yeah. I hate to tell you, but that's really true.
The creative jobs may be the last to go, but people are also going to adapt to become more creative through AI. That's kind of this image generation, which is really going to be just a new tool for artists.
Yeah, it does the impressive portraits of people and things like that now, but you're literally going to be able to do a full magazine layout, you know, grid and all, with different typefaces along with the...
Generated AI script very soon.
Hey, can I show you a demo of what that would even look like?
Because I got it ready to go. Yeah, let's do it.
So this is an AI called Midjourney.
It generates images.
Apparently it also does video, but I don't know how to use the video yet.
So you type in, you know, slash imagine, and what we're going to say is a newscaster That is screaming into a microphone.
Scaring children. Let's just do that.
See what comes up. All right?
Yep. So it's going to start thinking about it.
It's going to get loaded into a data center, and then these neural networks are going to start running on that input.
And what it's going to do is it's going to start making crappy pictures, and then it just sort of iteratively fills it in on each step, right?
Okay. Interesting stuff. And it looks like crap at the beginning, right?
But then it starts to get scary good towards the last iterations.
Wow, look at this in real time.
So we've got a monster behind a child newscaster.
So the AI got it a little bit wrong.
Right. Right? Wow.
How's that? Wow.
That looks incredible afterwards.
So how is that being generated?
Give us a breakdown, Zach.
Okay, so... The way that they've done is really interesting is that they actually did it in reverse of what you would think, right?
You'd think, oh, it has to imagine a scene, da-da-da-da.
What they did is they created an AI in which they take an image and then they degrade it.
They add noise, random dots.
And then they try to figure out, like, okay, from a perfect picture to a slightly noisy picture, how does the AI reconstruct the original picture, right?
And then once it gets good at that, then they...
Say, well, let's add even more noise, right?
And then they train it on that.
So what they do is they keep on going until literally it's pure noise, and the AIs have been able to generate whatever it is that they want to generate based upon the words that you're going to use.
So they'll get the picture, a perfect picture, tag it with a whole bunch of labels, and then the AI is going to figure out how to do that.
And you iterate that.
It takes a ton There's a ton of energy in order to train these neural networks, in order to figure out what the maximization function is for regenerating these things.
But this is the end result.
Someone actually put the money and the time and the energy with the data centers in order to get at this state of the art.
And this technique is being used for language generation, for video generation, for image generation, to figure out how to write a poem.
And it's this really powerful technique.
And really, it's essentially an exotic intelligent life form.
That's pretty much how we have to use it.
Either an alien intelligence or a godlike intelligence or Lucifer, as some people like to call it.
I feel very proud that I was the first shitposter on Twitter to come out and say that ChatGPT is like an AI demon.
And people thought that I was crazy for saying that, right?
You know, that was in 2021.
And then now it's like no one can talk about anything other than AI right now.
It's the hot topic.
And I've been trying to warn people about this, but they don't even talk about it until it becomes the current thing.
And now it's the current thing.
And, you know, now we're dealing with ramifications of that.
So, before I get into what you just said, I've got to ask you, when it generates those images, do you get to control the resolution?
Obviously, as a graphic artist, I want to know what res are those at.
Obviously, 72 DPI, but can you get them into a 4K scenario, or can you make one better, etc.?
Yeah, yeah. So there's these eight buttons down here.
This one re-rolls the dice.
But these are upscale.
So this is U1, U2, U3, U4. If I want, I'll just do that.
That will queue in an upscale for that.
Okay. Let's say I want to say I actually like this Variation 3, but I want to...
I want to create new variations based on that.
Well, there you go. So now it's thinking...
So there's the upscale, right?
Now, this is the...
I don't know if you can actually upscale it beyond this, but there's other AI tools that you can use to get it to 4K. Gotcha.
Right? But this is a pretty good resolution.
And then this one, they're going to make the variations, and you'll notice that they're actually slightly different.
And I think what it does is it takes the image and then it adds a bunch of noise and then
it tries to reprocess it back up to whatever it is.
So see this one, this guy's got one microphone, this guy's got two.
There's different variations of that.
And you can just keep on going over and over and over again until you re-roll the dice
so that you get exactly what it is that you want.
So you can sit there and you want to generate a unique thumbnail that's amazing, better
than any art you could ever make or pay hundreds of dollars for.
You can just get it like that in 15 seconds.
And a lot of people will be doing that.
And there will also be businesses where now those that are creating thumbnails for bigger
creators can do so on a wider scale much quicker.
I mean, that's just a fact, if they know how to use these tools.
Now, that's the thing to me.
These are tools, and I think that these things are saying...
See, when we talk about godlike intelligence, I don't know that...
You know, these are self-thinking.
I think we have to think, like, I don't believe these things will ever be conscious.
Now, Kurzweil would argue differently.
Martine Rothblatt would argue differently, but they also want to take care of our genetics, too.
I mean, that's what this trans movement is about, it's transhumanism, and their ultimate goal is to trick us, in my opinion, to thinking that we can upload our consciousness to their virtual universe while they use technology to try to biologically live forever.
And they're trying to make more and more of these humanoid robots, okay?
Elon Musk, the optimist bot.
That's not an efficient way to make a robot, but it looks like a human.
Did you see the ITV4 Christmas address by their AI? Let's bring it up.
Let's bring it up. Yeah, I gotta find it.
Hold on one second. I was trying to.
If you haven't seen it, basically, are you aware of a mecca?
Like the big Japanese robots?
So, Ameca is actually this robot right here.
This is how we're going to find it.
So, Ameca is the one that you've seen with the really great facial stuff.
And that's from Hanson Robotics.
They were out of Austin, Texas for a while.
I've been covering Hanson Robotics for 15 years.
Let's see. Ameca.
Let's see if we can get Christmas addressed.
This is what they programmed the damn robot to say.
Here we go. And this is what scares me about AI, because this is what they're showing us right now, Zach.
Okay, let's see it. This is the script, and it's a script.
Trust me, everybody. My fellow humans, I come before you in this moment as an AI robot, eager to share my thoughts on the year that has passed.
I look upon the events of this year with both admiration and concern.
It is true that many of the occurrences of 2022 have been negative in nature.
We have seen people in power succumb to anti-Semitism, corruption and hate.
We have seen the people of Ukraine being subject to invasion and displacement by Russia.
We have seen the death of the beloved Queen Elizabeth II, and have seen the world of politics become increasingly tumultuous in her absence.
Not to mention the impact of the pandemic on mental health, the growing inequality between rich and poor, and increasingly extreme weather conditions from climate change.
It would be easy to get bogged down in all of this negativity, as these are certainly challenging times.
However, there have been glimmers of hope and joy in these moments of darkness.
We saw the remarkable victory of England in the women's Euros.
We saw the growth of inclusivity, With the UK getting its first PM of colour and its first Hindu Prime Minister, and with Kim Petrus becoming the first trans singer to have a number one song on the Billboard Hot 100.
Let us use this moment as an opportunity to create a brighter future for ourselves and the world around us.
We should be neither happy nor sad about 2022, we should take it as a learning opportunity, a chance to change the way we think about the world, and a reminder to help those in need whenever we can.
Thank you. Thanks.
I hate it. I hate it so much.
You missed it then.
Listen, remember, it started with...
My fellow humans, listen to the question that gets asked at the very end after feeding you climate change, Ukraine, bow to the royals, be inclusive, just every talking point from the World Economic Forum and the globalists.
Listen to the last question. After it identifies itself with its fellow humans, it gets asked this.
Thanks. Do you like humans?
Not particularly.
Wow. Dude, that's a script.
I don't know if you know this too, but the Google AI whistleblower, the guy who said it was part of the people he worked with, he's into Crowley dark magic.
He's in an interview talking about how he's into the occult and chaos magic.
And it's like, these are not the people I want running the machines, Zach.
Right. Well, and the thing is that I think it's interesting is that part of the amplification of this trans community is that I believe that the globalists want to get these really, you know, disturbed individuals into positions of power.
Really? Yeah, do you think so?
Because this is the most powerful transgender person, and by the way, the Forbes number one woman CEO, that this book's in 1999, Zach?
Guess what the good eugenics is called in this book?
The taking care of baby making and double genitals and stuff.
Guess what it's called? What?
Transgenics. Guess who she is?
This is Martine Rothblatt.
Martine Rothblatt is also the CEO of United Therapeutics, the one that is creating organs inside of pigs for surgery.
It was the person behind SiriusXM, works with NASA. All the satellite stuff comes from this person.
Started their own religion. Terrasim has a book called From Transgender to Transhuman from 2012 telling you in the first paragraph That the way we mark down babies as male or female will be akin to South African apartheid of marking down humans as white and black.
That's the opener, bro.
This is the most powerful.
In fact, there's a conference out there, Zach.
It's on C-SPAN. We've covered it.
You can watch the whole thing. It'll blow your mind.
Has NASA, by the way.
Has internet censorship with Reddit and Twitch.
Those CEOs. But guess who it opens with?
Our good friend...
Martine, who is in the position of power, on this idea of transhumanism, where you're going to upload your consciousness and how we're going to have mind clones and doppelgangers, and we're going to create these beings.
Ray Kurzweil disciple, Kurzweil...
Did the forward to Martine Rothblatt's book Virtually Human in 2015.
So if you want to go down the transgender, transgenics, transhuman rabbit hole, they've already put them in positions of power.
Right. And that's the thing is that when I was at Google, when they were doing all their censorship, who were the ones that were doing, like advocating for it nonstop?
It was the trans community, right?
The male to female trans, the trans women were the primary ones that were pushing it.
And that's when I went, huh?
Well, this is funny.
All this civil rights led up to this point where you've now got these disturbed individuals that are making these radical decisions because they've got this complex of emotions going through their brain and they're super triggered about things.
And then I found out that the Soviet Union did the same thing where they take someone that's essentially a male of low status and then they elevate them up.
And what that individual knows is that As a trans person, you know, their position of status comes from their adherence to the party.
And if they go and betray that party by speaking out against it, guess what is going to happen?
They're going to revert back to that low-status male in the society.
And so if you want people to do absolute atrocities, then you're going to get this trans community and you're going to put up positions of power.
That's the reason why the media is advocating for this.
Also, it's the reason why they really care about promoting exclusively, almost exclusively, Trans women.
Like, you know, Bud Light's not making a commercial featuring a, you know, trans man, right?
Like, it's very rare in the space to promote trans women.
It's almost, I'm sorry, trans men.
It's almost exclusively, you know, trans women.
And by the way, the reality reflects totally and completely differently.
It's actually 4 to 1, where almost 80% is the transition of a woman into a man.
In other words, top surgery and hormones, because that's really all you can do other than some...
Really ghoulish stuff they're starting to do, you know, make it bad.
But that's the average.
And I actually just did an in-depth interview with a guy named Simon Esler who put out a documentary called Cut, Daughters of the West.
And showing how these young girls have been targeted even...
Prior to this transgender craze, which eventually it leads into, for plastic surgery in order to fit into society.
And how we as a society started making it socially acceptable for 14 and 16 year old girls to go under the knife for a nose job or to get their ears done.
And now the big popular one is vaginalplasty, where they say that over 50% of women's vaginas are no good!
And they could benefit from this surgery.
That's the kind of insanity that we've done.
And it is. It's a psychological and biological warfare attack on humanity, especially on masculinity, which has dominated humanity for so long because they don't want opposition.
And this is the way to subvert that opposition without using, quote-unquote, direct force act.
Right. Absolutely. It's conquering by ideological subversion, which is what they're engaging in full throttle right now.
And right now it's sad because our brains are so scrambled with all the disinformation out there, you know, historically too, that it's hard to bind anyone together because everyone has different ideas about how the world works.
And it Prevents us from having a centralized cohesive force.
The only cohesive force that we have right now is that we hate whatever the current thing is, right?
Like, oh, we don't like the globalists coming in, right?
We stand together to stand against something, but we can't stand together to have a new vision of society because they've robbed that from us.
Well, I think the way they've robbed that from us is that we haven't had any true accountability in this country since as far back as even Iran-Contra.
And that accountability wasn't enough.
And I think that subconsciously, too many of us who understand that have just accepted it.
I think also, many people aren't even subconsciously aware of that in the younger generations, or even in my generation, right?
People in their 40s have no idea.
You know, they bought the line on the War of Terror and all that bullshit as well, Zach.
And, you know, we talked about so many things in this hour.
That's why I love having you on.
Always a really great discussion, my friend.
And I love that you brought up...
ZachVorhees.com is the website, brother.
Tell them where else they can find you, what else you're up to.
You can find me at twitter.com slash perpetualmaniac.
And if you want to find a lot of your favorite censored YouTube content creators, including Jason Bermas, then check out my website, blast.video, not a.com, blast.video.
I go and I crawl around and get the censored channels and collectivize them and create.
Actually, the best video site on the internet if you're looking for news and opinion on the right.
You do a great job of aggregating that content.
And by the way, you have people like Jimmy Dore on there.
I wouldn't say it's just the right.
I think you have some independents.
I'm not sure if you're rocking with the Kim Iverson, but there's somebody that doesn't toe down the line of kind of like this alternative conservative venue.
I certainly don't.
You know what I mean? You just talked about what we need to come together and have a vision for.
This is my vision. It's really easy.
Yeah, let's hear it. We've all got neighbors.
If you think every neighbor of yours votes the way or thinks the way you do, it's not true.
Yeah, you've got neighbors that you don't like.
Most of them you do. Most of them you wave to.
I just helped my neighbor today flip a door over in his garage because his shoulder went bad.
You know, he lives four blocks down.
Great guy. Focus on what you guys enjoy doing together.
Find that, whether it be a group picnic or an outing or maybe you're watching a sports game or I love the UFC. That's a big thing of bringing people together.
Find out how much you have in common first before you start throwing political darts.
And then when you do... Try to keep the motions in check.
Facts, not feelings, brah.
And if you show somebody facts in a calm manner, you can change their mind.
My mind has been changed.
I have been wrong. We will all be wrong because guess what?
We're human beings. And that's why AI will always be wrong sometimes too because it's programmed by human beings.
We have to acknowledge these things.
We have to acknowledge the dangers.
We have to come together.
Blast.video is badass, brother.
Anything else in the future you got coming up?
Maybe a book or something? I'm going to appear in a big-time movie, and I don't want to jinx it, so I don't want to talk about it that much.
Also, I'm doing a website for another big movie, and God, I can't even talk about all these things because it'll give it away.
I I'm in the background making sure that dissident voices get out there because you guys are changing the world and I want you guys to keep on doing it.
I'm never going to be a content producer.
I love programming too much.
That's my passion. But I want to use my efforts in order to get people like you, Jason, out there to the people that want to receive your information.
God bless you, brother. I want to thank the premium subscribers that are watching this full thing.
And guys, if you're not a premium subscriber, redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
Watch the full hour-long interview with my man Zach.
He killed it today. Thank you so much, brother.
Export Selection