All Episodes
Previous Next
March 2, 2023 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
01:00:58
The AntiChrist NASA Armageddon & World Government According To Peter Thiel | Reality Rants
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy. Silence!
The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
You've got to say, I'm a human being!
God damn it! My life has value!
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature!
Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
Yeah, thank you.
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Thank you.
It's showtime.
And now, Reality Rant with Jason Burmess.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Good morning, everybody.
It's Reality Rants.
I am Jason Bermas.
This is Red Voice Media.
And we've got another jam-packed show for you today.
In fact, I thought that the first hour, maybe hour plus of this show...
Was going to be solely Peter Thiel.
And if you do not know who Peter Thiel is, you best buckle the truck up.
Because this guy is somebody who I've been watching, listening to, and not only listening to him...
And watching where he goes, what he says, but trying to see the fruits of his labor and investments.
This is a guy that I put in my film almost a decade ago.
We released Shade the Motion Picture, so on my radar well over a decade ago.
Basically because he was an up-and-coming, nouveau tech billionaire who had a persona...
Of being a libertarian, right?
He was a guy during the Ron Paul Revolution, for instance, that got some good spin, especially later on with the Tea Party crowd, because he gave money to Ron Paul.
And once again, he was portraying himself as kind of like this free speech, absolutist thinking.
Even the United States had too many restrictions.
And in my film, Shade the Motion Picture...
Webster Tarpley posits the idea that Thiel put forward of kind of a island that is constructed and built man-made that isn't beholden to the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
And therefore, in Tarpley's eyes, this is kind of like the perfect way for a technocratic type slavery state.
Okay? Now, Thiel...
Is the PayPal guy.
Every time I show that picture of the musker do, the musker nuts, with that terrible hairline, with the PayPal screen on the big chunky monitor, he's next to Peter Thiel.
Okay? Thiel.
Biggest, I think, and first private investor into Facebook.
Private investor. Why a private investor?
Because Teal also is the Palantir guy, which is a broad spectrum of techno-surveillance.
And now, again, for the better part of more than probably a decade and a half.
Maybe close to two now.
Peter's been around the block.
Been climbing up.
Okay? But probably a decade, decade and a half.
He's been not only a member of...
Bilderberg, but a steering member.
Almost like the younger, hipper counterpart to say, and Eric Schmidt.
Although, they're both very involved in kind of all these fields.
Right? And Thiel often plays the good guy.
Or at least verbalizes that he's the good guy.
Warning of things like, I don't know, AI, climate, Nukes.
The Antichrist world government.
What? I was so taken aback by this.
And what we're going to watch right now.
And then we'll come back to full circle.
And probably, I'm going to guess because I have all these other clips and all these other stories that I want to get to.
It's going to be the meat and potatoes of the second hour.
Because I was going to actually just cut this up.
It's about an hour plus long.
It's on Oxford's page.
And I think to myself, you know, is this kind of like an inside, I'm talking to the other, you know, quote-unquote, I guess, I don't want to call them elites.
But the next generation of players in this saga, because, you know, again, he's at Oxford, he's in the university system, and I'm kind of letting them in on the secret.
I'm being extremely blunt with them, but then it's also recorded for the internet and it's out there.
And that's one of the things that's extremely powerful about the internet.
So I was going to try to cut this up last night, and about the first 30 minutes is Theo giving a speech, and then he gives a Q&A. Every time I wanted to cut something out, I'm like, no, I should leave that in because I want to discuss that portion of it.
And look, he used some words even I don't know.
Not that I'm some kind of brilliant person, but he's speaking in a way that is definitely geared towards the crowd that's sitting before him.
Now the next thing that totally caught me off guard about this clip, and by the way, we're going to get to the clip in a minute.
I want to shout out to Gons at Face Like the Sun.
I believe he's over at Rockfin.
But he's the one that made me aware of this clip.
And again, really important clip in my opinion.
And he also gave me the link to the YouTube so I could watch the whole thing.
One thing I found really odd is that Thiel is sweaty.
He's stammering. Now, I've heard him give speeches before where maybe he stammers here and there, but he stammers a lot in this one.
I don't want to say that he sounds nervous, but something's off, man.
And, I mean, listen, I get greasy.
I get sweaty. There's a sheen.
I get it. But he is ultra-greasy from the get-go.
And some of the other highlights of Thiel that I hadn't discussed, because there are many.
I mean, many. There was no way that I was going to edit this.
Listen, in the first, like, 15 minutes, he pops off on the Manhattan Project.
He pops off on NASA. Okay?
He pops off on transhumanism and string theory, and he even uses the term Kurzweilian.
And he talks about the false promises we've all been made.
And that's like, wow!
You know, being very starkly aggressive in what he's verbalizing here.
Okay? So, we're going to play this clip of Peter Thiel right now.
I'm going to do a small breakdown of it.
I want you to thumbs this up.
Got 145 watching over on YouTube.
Can we get 100 thumbs up?
Rumble, same thing. Let's hit the like.
Share the links. And remember, the second hour is going to be over at redvoicemedia.com slash Jason or slash Uncensored.
Sign up. Ten bucks a month.
A buck to try for the first week.
Okay? Or a hundred dollars.
Lock it in for the whole year.
We're not going anywhere. We do it four days a week and we're adding more.
There's going to be a lot more.
This is a network, which is awesome.
I love that. I want to thank everybody who signed up yesterday.
I think one of the reasons we got the sign up yesterday, a lot of people go over to Podbean just to go listen live for free.
We do that with the premium, which is awesome.
But the problem with Podbean yesterday is you want to visually see the INWO cards, the one with everything cards, right?
So a few people were like, you know what?
We're going to give it a try.
Thank you. Thank you.
Now listen. After you watch Theal in this clip, uh, Teal, I always, I want to say Theal all the time because it's got the H, it's Teal.
Uh, one of the reasons we're gonna watch Teal in this clip and then come back around, okay, and you're gonna, you know, you can just listen to that.
Over on Podbean. It's going to be almost the same thing, but you can support the show otherwise.
By the way, Teal also, a couple features here.
He had offshore research into experimentation on humans to try to cure herpes.
That's another Teal rabbit hole you can go down.
And he bankrolled the lawsuit of Hulk Hogan against Gawker, which put Gawker out of business.
Because he was upset that Gawker had outed him because at the time he was a closeted homosexual.
I just want full disclosure.
I mean, Teal goes deep.
I'd like to have Teal on.
You know, I think I could have a civil conversation with him.
But at the same time, it's like, you know, these people, man.
So here's Peter right here.
Again, world government, antichrist, all sorts of good stuff.
Do not hide under the rock and pretend these things are not real.
But we have to make the list complete, and I would include as a very, very serious existential risk, you know, the risk if you end up with a one-world totalitarian state.
That also counts as an existential risk, and it seems to me that we shouldn't We shouldn't be too short-sighted about that one.
We should always fight that.
That's something that always needs to be stopped.
And at the same time, he's kind of part of this broad, unelected, global governance body that's constantly pushing global governance.
Like I said, I mean, look at him.
Stuttering, stammering, dark eyesight.
I mean, I got the dark eyesight, too.
You know, I get up early.
I understand that part, Peter.
But boy, oh boy.
Yikes. Let's keep going.
You know, I should not need to remind you that in the sort of quasi-mythological New Testament account, the slogan of the Antichrist is peace and safety.
We're told that there's nothing worse than Armageddon, but perhaps there is.
Perhaps we should fear the Antichrist.
Perhaps we should fear the one-world totalitarian state more than Armageddon.
And perhaps we should stick with some of the tried-and-true ideas of classical realism this organization and this institution has been supporting for 200 years and keep going for another 200.
Thank you very much. So that's how he closes that out.
Okay? So, I'm just going to say, the opening of this thing is just as interesting and strong as what you just heard.
And obviously, you know, Teal doesn't strike me as the religious type one way or the other.
And Teal is one of those guys that is very much also a transhumanist.
So he's sitting there.
He's telling you. He even questions scientists and the science.
I mean, it's a powerful, powerful speech.
Period. And that's why we're going to watch basically the whole thing eventually.
I don't know when we're going to start it back up.
But we're going to circle back Jen Psaki style to that.
We're going to circle it right back.
And I'll try to at least get 5 or 10 minutes of the last part of the broadcast so you can hear what I'm talking about when he leads in.
And again, I started cutting stuff out and I'm like, I don't need to be cutting any of this out.
This all needs to be heard.
Okay? So, let's move on for a second.
Let's keep going down. And there's a few stories I want to hit, and then we're going to hit a fun one.
Not as funny as yesterday.
I know a lot of people enjoyed either one of the best online dressing downs or set-up sketches I've seen in a while.
I'm just going to say that here.
Green Apple users fume at new feature that slows charging when clean energy isn't used.
So what they do is they sneak in the nice little update where you have the clean energy charging.
Oh, and right now you're able to put it on or off.
Oh, it's your carbon footprint.
So you may have a fast charging device, and you may have a fast charger, but that fast charger isn't green.
It's not Apple official.
No, no, no, no, no.
Slow, slow, slow, slow, slow.
So at first, they'll make it like it's a fun incentive.
Right? It was a fun incentive to allow these smart devices Meters in your home for heat and electricity.
Fun incentive. No, they're shutting you down.
They're shutting you off.
They're giving you a new credit score.
Now, you know, a lot of people have a hard time believing this when I talk about it.
But I'll talk about it right now.
And I'll continue to talk about it.
Because it's just...
It's just who I am.
It's part of me.
I grew up extremely poor.
I saw people even that were supposedly middle class constantly going into debt.
What was an appearance that they had more money or a better lifestyle would often come crashing down when they didn't pay their debts.
And also, it was not only a level playing field, it was almost more devastating for those friends that had to go through that with their families.
And as a 43 years young, I have never, I have never, ever, ever, ever had a credit card.
Not once. I have never paid for a car through payments, any of it.
That being said, I don't know that I've spent, I think closest is close to $10,000 maybe on a car over the years.
But every time I bought something like that, usually it's much less than that in the $5,000 to $7,000 range.
I guess I've put some money into it.
I've saved up. Or I've had the money.
I've made the money. I haven't taken out a loan.
I haven't done payments.
I don't have a credit card.
And I know people will be like, well, you'll never own a home, and you'll never this, and you'll never that.
How many people are defaulting on their mortgages?
You know, secondly, even being in Iowa, I love Iowa, I love it here.
You never know where you're going to end up.
Okay? And all that marketing is just like, when I want to settle down and I want to find something and I want to do it, I'll cross that bridge.
But I just don't want to be indebted.
I don't want any part of your credit system at all.
At all. It's just me.
I don't like it.
Again, I go back to those walks I had as a kid with my grandfather.
He loved to walk.
And boy, he loved to pick up change.
We're going to put this away.
Save it up. It's going to be something.
Save your money. Save, save, save, save, save.
I'm not even the best at that.
But pretty good at being like, hmm, I don't want to take out some high interest loan because I'm desperate for cash right now.
You know what I'll do? I'll buckle down.
I'll sleep in somebody's closet, which I have, or on a couch.
And I'll work, work, work until I have money and get my own place.
Just me. Just how I feel.
Alright, let's move on down the line.
I don't think I went over this one.
It's kind of the monsters among us.
Nine men arrested in San Angelo for allegedly seeking you-know-what with minors.
Alright? Just have a look, guys.
I want people to know they're out there.
This is in Texas. Let's read their names.
There they are.
Let's soak it in.
Okay, let's see the faces. Monsters among us.
They're there. They are real.
Okay. Air in East Palestine is toxic.
Scientists released shock report.
Is it shocking? Showing higher than normal concentrations of nine potentially harmful chemicals.
Despite EPA ruling train derailment, danger zone was safe.
Really? Every one of our institutions right now, every single one, top to bottom, has little to no trust by the vast majority of the populace.
Why? Because deep inside, even if you don't want to believe it, we know you are liars and you are corrupt.
And a lot of people are still clinging to On to the idea that they are just so inept and they constantly make the wrong decision.
They're incompetent.
People don't fail upwards like that unless at the tibbity top there's an agenda for these things to continually happen.
And then you just, like, pass the buck.
And we'll get into that with the new lockdown files coming out in the United Kingdom, where I agree with Gareth Icke that this seems to be limited hangout at best, and they're burning, you know, one person, but they're burning them with incompetence.
No malice! No malice!
Right? And going, no, no, no.
Just like the eco-health thing.
And that's why we've also got this great clip we're going to get to in a bit of Sam Husseini actually asking of the Eco-Health Alliance funding now.
Okay? Because we have that big Department of Energy story.
And again, I see people posting, you know, jokes about who cares what the Department of Energy thinks.
Look, I get it. But you have to understand, this is an organization that sounds innocuous for a reason, because they are part of classified programs and have been part of those programs that are human experimentation programs.
We documented it here.
Okay? So, again, to most of us, this is like saying, hey, the sun is hot and the sky is blue, water is wet, and bacon is delicious.
That's what this is like saying.
I just, oh, I can't, I can't do it.
I can't do it. Like, death possible, injury possible.
And the biggest scandal is not only that they're lying about all this, they didn't need to blow this thing up.
Let's repeat it. They didn't need to blow this thing up.
They didn't need to blow it up.
But they did. But they did.
Alright, one more story and then we're going to break into something a little fun.
And then we're going to get to some not-so-fun stuff.
New details emerge in shocking suicide of billionaire Thomas H. Lee.
This is the envy of Wall Street.
Okay? And he's a Clinton pal, the 70-year-old, 8-year-old philanthropist.
Oh, I love when they call them philanthropists.
And Clinton pal was discovered by a female assistant on the floor of the bathroom in his office, his family office, at the Fifth Avenue headquarters of his financial firm shortly after 11 a.m.
on Thursday. The assistant went to look for a boss, a married dad of five, who pioneered the leveraged buyout industry.
Because he hadn't been heard from, sources said.
First responders found Lee, also a grandfather of two, lying on his side with a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head.
Again, I'm not insinuating it wasn't a suicide.
If it was a suicide, you have to wonder why.
Remember, all these people, like Harvard guy, Harvard grad, all these people have all the money in the world, seem like they have the apex of power.
How happy are they? You know, what demons do they really have?
Questions that should be asked, in my opinion.
Just throwing it out there. It's just me.
Maybe I'll be a little wild.
Okay. So...
Two stories here.
Two stories. First one, I want to show this video.
Because when I saw this video, I was like, oh my god.
This is terrible.
I mean, what did I just watch?
What am I looking at? What did I just see?
And basically...
Look, again, I keep the social media off of this.
The only social media we have is Twitter.
And Twitter's where I find a lot of these great stories, guys.
Including the Theal one.
Teal. Okay?
And I see this video.
And it's posted by Truthstream Media.
And it said, you know, what did I just watch?
And it seems to be, you know, like, this young...
Attractive blonde woman speaking.
I'm like, alright, so I'm going to hit it.
And the person's talking and they're touching their lips.
And they're like, I can't believe this thing is giving me lips.
I came up in the time of like the dog filter of Snapchat.
Basically, this is like a real-time beauty filter that doesn't make you look like a painting, but changes your appearance in real-time rather convincingly.
Okay? And I've talked about this technology before.
We've known it's existed.
Now it's commercially available.
You want to talk about catfish in real time.
Here we go. Let's just do it to it because this one really...
I mean, you make the call, guys.
I can't believe this is a filter.
The fact that this is what filters have evolved into is actually crazy to me.
I grew up with the dog filter on Snapchat.
And now, this filter gave me lip fillers.
This is what I look like in real life.
I mean, look at the eye difference.
That's real life.
Okay? That's the eye and the lip fillers.
Let's go back again.
In real time. This is what I look like in real life.
And again, it's not like an ugly person.
But this person now has a different face.
Let's bring it back again.
I can't believe this is a filter.
The fact that this is what filters have evolved into is actually crazy to me.
I grew up with the dog filter on Snapchat, and now this filter gave me lip fillers.
This is what I look like in real life.
Are you kidding me?
Nope. They're not kidding you.
And that brings me to my next story.
ChatGPT. I haven't played with it.
I've considered, on this show, downloading it live and playing it, by the way.
Playing with it and, you know, maybe going into the chat and trying to figure out some prompts and asking it questions and having a good time with it.
Maybe we're going to But, you're going to wonder, this is the part of AI that we're going to bring into the conversation.
Okay? That's what I want to do right now.
How am I going to do this?
Well, yesterday, I, uh, a rather portly Burmese.
I need to lose some poundage.
It's a bad angle, but whatever.
Miletic has gained a little weight too.
Sorry, Pat, I love you. And that's Jen's pulver in the middle.
Okay? And pulver just got...
Put into the Hall of Fame. I'll be calling fights now in about three weeks.
Three weeks from two days from now.
Thursday, Friday, Saturday. Cagedaggression.tv, baby.
Very excited about that.
I love it when that happens.
And I went to go shoot a commercial.
Now, how does this have anything to do with AI and chat GPT? Well, my buddy, Justin Holston, who's shooting the commercial and we're in his office, actually had chat GPT Write the commercial for him, after he put the parameters in, in the style of Tim...
Whatchamacallit?
I'm probably going to end up with a copyright strike on this one, too.
Maybe we'll play the video afterwards.
Because, obviously, you can see there's some cowbell in there.
In fact, we'll play the video...
In the second hour.
But there's a video, and it's written in the style of Tim Dillon.
It's with myself, Miletic.
Man, I want to play it.
It's so fun. I mean, I do look and sound obnoxious in it.
We'll wait. We'll do second hour.
That's what we'll do. We'll play it in second hour.
But the commercial, I mean, Justin was just fawning over the fact that That he didn't have to write the script at all.
And he just put the parameters in.
It took about 15 minutes.
And he thinks it nailed it almost on the first try.
And look, I think there needed to be a little bit of editing.
But for a first draft, it was pretty good.
No sound it. People want me to no sound it.
Yeah, I guess that's what we'll do.
No, you know what? I can't do that either because it's also got a background track.
And not to do shop on the air guys but I was actually trying to
Get rid of these copyright strikes from the one like ad I run for the network
If you're listening Ray, they gave me the wrong license.
They gave me a license for not driving rock energy It was something else
I was filling it out last night And then I realized that the license that I was trying to
get rid of these three copyright strikes for was for the wrong track
So driving rock energy is what we're looking for. All right So we're gonna wait. We'll get into the not-so-fun news.
I think that the visual AI is enough for now.
And I mean, we're talking not so fun right now.
Not so fun.
Did I not pull this one too?
Yeah, no, I did. Okay. So look, I think that we need to be concerned about World War III and especially nuclear war.
I don't like the idea of our troops over there.
I don't like the idea of NATO troops.
I don't like the idea of people dying.
Now, I saw a post from Randy Rhodes, who has been in the talk radio game for years.
I mean, decades. I believe Randy's been on my show way back in the day.
I know that I've been on Randy's show.
Randy used to question 9-11.
And when I saw Randy Rhodes attacking Jimmy Dore as a puppet of Putin, I'm sick to my stomach.
It's like, what happened?
First of all, just because you want the war to end and people not to die doesn't mean you're a Putin puppet or a Putin apologist.
I mean, to simplify everything as Lord Poot-Poot, as if Putin's not beholden to any interest, is like childlike and ridiculous.
Or if there aren't the same kind of complex factors in a nation-state that size or superpower that size.
Ridiculous. That you can't have a nuanced opinion.
Ridiculous. That you can't be for peace.
Ridiculous. So I got two clips here.
Back to back.
And they're just incredible.
This one is Sean Penn.
Who, again, Holly Weird.
This is the new push for war.
Forget about the USO and Bob Hope and all that stuff.
No, the new propaganda is guys like Sean Penn.
He's hard. Hollywood actor.
Big time lefty. And he actually talks about two things that are...
Just vomitas.
Vomitas! One, he says that we're being overcautious about nuclear weapons.
Don't think you can do that, Sean.
Especially the way things have escalated over there.
Okay? That's one.
And then he says, you know, we need to give them all this equipment, tanks, planes, but we're not going to have to sacrifice any American soldiers on the ground.
And the clip that's going viral right now is Zelensky saying that we need fresh young Americans to fight on the ground and they're going to die.
You can't make it up.
Here we go. This is Wolf Blitzer and Sean Penn.
The thing I'd like to say is, you know, having just returned from Ukraine about...
10 days ago or so, is that the impact of President Biden's trip was extraordinary.
I mean, that's extremely encouraging.
Oh, he is extraordinary. Biden can barely speak.
We'll be playing that clip after.
Biden can barely talk.
I think that one of the things that's concerned me, and I think that there's no question, but that they need more ammunition, more long-range precision weapons, and yes, fighter jets.
Can you imagine if I was on the news, like I'm on Wolf Blitzer, talking about like, I mean, basically like promoting World War III, Now, I'm kind of like in a pseudo-military garb, right? There's a little camo on my hat, but it says, killer tacos in pink on it!
You know, he's got the kind of like, I could be a Zelensky aide, white t-shirt, you know, plane jacket, camo hat, but killer tacos!
And he wants to be taken seriously.
And the issue really is that right now they're dying.
Every day they're dying.
So let's get negotiations on the table.
Let's pull back and let's not fuel the war machine, Sean.
What are you talking about?
What we're waiting for seems to still be attached to this...
I would argue overcautious concern related to nuclear weapons because, for one thing, if we're going to live in a world where a bully with nuclear weapons runs the show, there was a former...
Let's just stop it there.
I mean, he doesn't answer anything.
First of all, bullies with nuclear weapons do run the show, Sean.
Look in the mirror, you dummy.
I mean, what do you think one of our huge strengths are?
It's the fact that the United States actually used nuclear warfare.
Okay? The idea that I want to live in a world...
Because I haven't lived in a world, Sean...
Where anybody in the world, on the globe, was attacked via nuclear warfare.
I was born in 79, Sean.
I'd like to continue to live in that world.
I'm not trying to be undercautious.
I'm going to continue to be overcautious because the person that you're about to refer to after you're talking about this overcautiousness is a U.S. or former U.S. intel official.
Again, a professional liar.
A professional liar.
Intelligence officer I'd spoken to in Ukraine at one point, he said, you know, he doesn't want to live in that world and Ukraine won't.
And so I just think we have to make a clear decision to start saving lives, saving infrastructure.
And what that means is supplying the Ukrainians.
They have no interest in having Americans or others in the fight.
No interest of having Americans or others in the fight.
Are you listening to this man?
Did you hear what he said?
Because the exact opposite was just said by his buddy.
I mean, the polar opposite, one end, the other, said the exact opposite of that.
No, he still wants your tanks.
He wants your equipment, your missiles, your Starlink, your drones.
He wants all that. He wants the blood of Americans.
I just... Wow.
Let's bring it back. Let's make sure I didn't point, you know, put any words in Sean Penn's mouth.
...want to live in that world, and Ukraine won't.
And so, I just think we have to make a clear decision to start...
Saving lives, saving infrastructure, and what that means is supplying the Ukrainians.
They have no interest in having Americans or others in the fight.
They're ready to take the fight themselves.
And their ability to transition on these platforms, be it the F-16s or when it comes to the Patriot, I don't think there's been an honest conversation about how quickly they can transition.
I think there's a lot in the air about how long it takes, maintenance, fueling, all of that.
But there are many ways in which that can be sped up tremendously.
So here he is. Okay?
You ready? This is your buddy.
Saying the exact opposite.
What he just said. U.S. will have to send their sons and daughters exactly the same way as we are sending their sons and daughters to war and they will have to fight because it's nature that we're talking about and they will be dying, God forbid, because it's a horrible thing.
Yeah. Yeah, no, it's gonna happen.
This is, we're trying to push this because there's a zombie in office That doesn't know what's going on, who might as well be telling corn pop stories.
And I had a nurse named Pearl Nelson, military.
She'd come in and do things that I don't think you'll learn in medical school, nursing school.
No, I'm serious, Jack.
Pearl Nelson, she'd come in and do things.
And I had a nurse named Pearl Nelson, military.
She'd come in and do things that I don't think you'll learn in medical school, nursing school.
She'd whisper in my ear.
I couldn't understand him.
She'd whisper, she'd lean down.
She'd actually breathe on me to make sure that there was a connection, a human connection.
She even went home and brought back her pillow from her own bed because she didn't know the one I had.
It wasn't comfortable. But I'm not joking.
He's not joking.
He can't speak.
He's barely rambling.
Like he's looking off to the side.
The man runs nothing.
The man runs nothing.
Did I mention the man runs a nada a nothing?
Nothing. Alright?
And speaking of running nothing, this is Christopher Wray, the head of the FBI. He's the spokesperson for the cover-up crew of the FBI. And Ford Fisher, he's an independent journalist.
I've met Ford a couple times.
Nice guy. I like him.
He got his question about the pipe bomber of January 5th, 6th, asked to Christopher Wray.
And then the follow-up question on top of that is on, you know, the FBI informants and assets that could have been utilized that day.
And this guy just gives the complete bullshiz answer.
The Johnny nonsense.
Again, this is really what Ray's job is.
Ray's job is to take the establishment talking points that have been put out by his agency and reiterate them in an authoritative manner, acting like they're doing something.
Ford Fisher tweets, what I'd really like to ask the FBI director, on January 5th, 2021, a still-unidentified person planted pipe bombs at the DNC and RNC, which diverted law enforcement attention and resources on January 6th.
With hundreds of other January 6th defendants arrested over two years, how has the bomber still not been caught?
Does the FBI director feel confidently that they will come someday be brought to justice?
Well, I will say that I have enormous confidence in the team, the dedicated team that is...
I have enormous confidence in my team.
They are the best.
Let me say this right now.
They know damn well who did that.
And they knew that on January 6th.
By January 6th, I guarantee you, I guarantee you, someone in the intelligence community absolutely 100% knew exactly what had happened.
And I'm going to give you a little hint and a clue as to why.
Now this is speculation.
This is Jason Bermas saying, hey, this is my opinion.
And my opinion is this.
The FBI knew who did it because somebody within the intelligence community, they're the ones behind it.
Excuse me. Whether or not they were the ones that actually planted the bombs or they just utilized one of their assets or patsies is irrelevant.
By January 6th itself, after it had happened, because CCTV cameras are everywhere, someone in the FBI, whether they were involved in doing it or not, knew exactly what happened, Christopher Wray.
So I don't need to hear this just ridiculous, oh, I have confidence in my team.
This is the team that brought you Russiagate.
This is the team that's constantly going after the Trump or do for crimes that don't.
I haven't been able to get the guy out of anything.
And they would have loved to.
Loved to. These are the liars of 9-11.
Okay? They're an extension of the liars of weapons of mass destruction.
Okay? They're the liars of the first World Trade Center bombing.
They're the liars, liars, liars of the OKC bombing as well.
They're the COINTELPRO guys.
Do I have to continue?
Should I have to continue?
They're the guys that cut deals with Epstein in signed documents by Robert Mueller.
But, Chris, tell us about this pipe bomber.
Focused exclusively on that investigation, and we have devoted loads and loads of effort into that specific investigation.
We've done investigative publicity, calling for the public's help.
And so our folks are working very, very hard on that investigation.
And those folks, those FBI agents, analysts and professional staff, I have total confidence in them.
And the other Twitter question we get a lot is, did the FBI have undercover agents or paid informants or assets among the mob that stormed the Capitol on January 6th?
He didn't even get it done, and he's...
Yes.
The answer is yes. That's not speculation.
Let me repeat that. That's not my opinion.
That's not speculation.
The answer is yes.
That answer is yes.
Period. Of course they did.
Yes, yes, and some more with yes.
Well, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Brett, I can't really appropriately talk about when, where, and how we use confidential informants.
Is it classified? Well, we have information that is about any number of topics that is law enforcement sensitive.
Law enforcement sensitive is not classified.
Okay? So...
Again, I like how Brett...
Listen, I'm not a huge fan of Brett Baer.
He's pretty much a straight, read-off-the-line kind of guy.
He gives you one of those...
Is it classified?
Law enforcement sensitive?
Oh. What is classified regarding the pipe bomber in January 5th and 6th?
Chris... But you should not read into my inability to answer a question because of my obligations as that is a clue or a hint in any way about how accurate your reader's tweet is.
Again, he's the spokes guy.
That's what he is.
He's the spokes guy.
Okay. One more of these clips right here.
And I want to point to this.
This, I think, is going to end up being a very big non-scandal.
You know, we got the Department of Energy.
And now the leaked stuff.
Now they're going through emails.
And Matt Hancock is saying, they're saying he rejected expert advice.
Alright, the WhatsApp messages are revealing.
He was talked to about what he could and could not do.
About what the plan actually was.
And he went around lockstep.
And now he's getting burned for it.
But he's not getting burned for what he really did.
He's going to get a little slapsky on the wrist.
And some press.
And how could you? And again, incompetence.
Incompetence. And that's why this exchange right here by one of the few journalists...
Left out there, in my opinion, Sam Husseini, we've been highlighting a lot of his stuff because he's been kicking ass and taking names.
Here we go. We believe in the importance of...
Doing all we can to understand the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, both in the context of the pandemic we're still emerging from, but also to better prepare ourselves for any future pandemics that are to come.
The other part of this is continuing to impress upon the PRC the importance of transparency.
Yes, I did call in.
Yeah, go ahead. Thank you. China, pandemic origins.
Many have reported the NIH role With EcoHealth Alliance and work done to make coronaviruses more dangerous at Ralph Baric's lab at the University of North Carolina as well as with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
But USAID, which is part of the State Department, funneled far more money to EcoHealth Alliance, especially through its PREDICT program, than the NIH did.
I have a couple of questions on this.
When will USAID release proposals, progress reports, and correspondence for USAID grants and contracts to EcoHealth Alliance with subcontracts or other pass-throughs to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and other relevant entities?
I'm not immediately familiar with this contract.
These are the types of questions you're welcome to send in to us.
I mean, when you're addressing China, you did say you're doing all you can to address the pandemic origins issue, and you called for transparency.
So if I might get these on the record, why does USAID fund bioweapons agents discovery research in particular?
Why has USAID funded bioweapons agents discovery research performed in collaboration with China?
We have, and again, if we have anything to provide on these specific questions, we'd be happy to provide that.
We have an abiding interest in working with countries around the world on issues of global public health.
So you look at this, and this is why I like Husseini.
He used the terminology correctly, bioweapons.
Look, I'm not even sure I should be playing this clip.
We're still on YouTube, but I wanted to play it.
Because I think, you know, this is in the press room.
This is in a context that I'm not going to speculate at all.
And, you know, I'm just glad somebody's at least asking these questions.
It's incumbent upon the United States as a responsible country to do all we can when it's in our interests.
The interest of the American people, but also when it's in the interest of the global community, as is the case with infectious disease, to work with countries around the world to strengthen this global health resilience.
But the stipulation here is that this collaboration could have caused the problem.
Specific question. So there he is, Sam Husseini, husseini.substack.com, an actual journalist.
All right. Like I said, when we go over to the other side, I'm going to show you the chat GPT commercial that came out.
And Justin added a little spice at the end.
But otherwise, the whole thing is written by AI. But first, I want to go back to Peter Thiel.
I promised we would watch some of it.
Really, that's going to be, again, the meat and potatoes of this second hour.
But I really felt like this was extremely important.
So here we go. Well, Charlie, thank you so much for that terrific introduction and a lot of different things to cover.
I'm always reminded of a question a colleague of mine liked to ask.
What is the antonym of diversity?
What word is the single antonym of diversity?
And university. And, uh...
Did you get it?
Did you get it? University is one.
Diversity is many.
The guy in the scarf back here got it.
He got a little chuckle out of teal.
There you go. Just wanted to put that out there.
And I think it is such a great honor and privilege here to speak here at the Oxford Union, where for 200 years people have been thinking about the crisis of the university, the crisis of the West, the crisis of classical liberalism.
There are elements of this that are of course timeless and eternal.
And then, of course, there are parts of it that are always, you know, there's always sort of a kaleidoscopic newness and effervescence to it as well.
You know, I frame my talk as anti-anti-anti-anti-classical liberalism.
And he's kind of a joke there.
Anti-anti-anti-anti-anti.
Classic liberalism. When I heard him say that, all I could think to myself is this guy is talking about the post-truth world.
And he gives a lot of hints to that throughout.
Kind of questioning what is truth?
What are taboos?
Who should we trust?
Can we trust the science if we can't understand it?
So you have a double negative that's kind of a positive.
A quadruple negative is also kind of a positive.
And I'm going to try to sort of outline, as I see, the argument, as well as the best arguments against the university, classical liberalism, you know, sort of the free Western world.
And at the end of the four negatives, I will still come down on something that I think is quite close to the values that would have animated the Oxford Union already 200 years ago.
Now, I'll start with sort of a little bit of a historical anecdote.
I was a student at Stanford University in the late 80s, early 90s.
We had a lot of these crazy culture wars, you know, wars about the nature of the university.
One of the ones where I sort of first came in some ways to sort of political awareness was an intense debate at Stanford about the Western canon.
A course called Western Culture.
It was a required freshman course.
In some ways, it was a debate about the course, but of course, it was also a debate about the whole Western civilization it represented.
There was a famous protest that Jesse Jackson led at Stanford.
Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western culture's got to go.
It was a sort of referendum on the course and on our entire civilization.
and I started one of these sort of independent, conservative, libertarian,
alternative newspapers. We decided we should like investigate it. We needed to
sort of describe the new curriculum and to figure out ways to denounce the new
curriculum.
Now let me just stop this.
So he's talking about the culture wars all the way back in the 80s and early 90s.
All right. And what he's about to describe is really the Streisand effect regarding him.
So essentially he's talking about starting this small paper at Stanford with what he's saying are conservative viewpoints.
And then he's going to say he finds basically this obscure story.
And from this obscure story and him shining the light on this story, it gets picked up via, I believe, the Wall Street Journal.
And eventually this person gets the Nobel Prize.
So it seems like it had the opposite effect of the intended one.
But again, let him tell it.
And by the way, he starts off, again, he's looking really sweaty, he's stuttering, he's stammering.
I don't know, was he out on a bender the night before?
And in the 88-89 term, one of the new classes called, the sort of innovative new class was Europe and the Americas, which was not really a non-Western, but more an anti-Western class.
Sort of polemic and you had sort of all these different authors and I thought, you know, I should go to the bookstore and just read through the books and find people to illustrate the sort of parochiality and tendentiousness of this new curriculum.
I came on one book that somehow was almost too good to be true.
It was sort of summarized Like, in an Onion episode, everything that was, you know, a stereotype of everything that was ridiculous about the new curriculum.
It was a story of Ayte Rigoberta Menchu.
She was this Guatemalan native, and she's sort of been victimized by every vector of oppression imaginable.
She was, you know, she was a poor, she was a peasant, she was an Indian, she was an orphan, and then you have sort of, she sort of achieved some sort of revolutionary communist consciousness in the course of this So basically he's saying that, you know, he tried to find something that was parody level.
Parody level. And he even references the onion and then names them off.
All right, now watch.
You know, I wrote it up.
And as so many of these debates encampuses, it somehow was a very narrow issue that somehow kicked off a broader discussion.
You know, as a 19-year-old junior at Stanford, I managed to get this reprinted in the Wall Street Journal.
When some of the conservatives wrote books about the insanities of the universities in the late 80s, early 90s, one of the conservative people, the Stanford chapter was entitled Travels with Rigoberta.
I sort of succeeded in turning her into an icon for this thing, and then sort of four years later, Fall of 1992, I'm now clerking for a judge and driving to work in Atlanta, Georgia.
And on the radio, it's, you know, we just have an announcement.
We have someone who's just been selected for the Nobel Peace Prize, someone nobody's ever heard of.
It's Rigoberta Menchu.
And I sort of realized at that moment that, yeah, I thought I was engaged in some kind of cosmic battle between the forces of good and evil.
And actually, I had just been a two-bit actor in some left-wing drama.
So let's just stop that.
I thought that was super interesting.
The idea that even as a young man, Thiel is talking about being in a cosmic battle with good and evil, and then he ends the speech on the Antichrist safety, right?
I mean, public safety and peace, and a one-world government warning.
I think it's worth noting, right?
And then saying, well, I'm not really that person, unfortunately.
And instead, I was just kind of a side player in somebody else's story.
And again, I'm not so sure that's the case.
I think that it's cosmically more interwoven than that.
But to me, this was, again, just a big representation of that Streisand effect.
We're going to play a little bit more of this.
All right? And then in four minutes, we're going over to redvoicemedia.com slash Jason, redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored.
All right? $1 for the first week, $10 a month, $100 for the year.
Help support the broadcast.
You can listen to it for free over on Podbean, the Info Warrior.
Check out the Podbean.
You can listen to it all for free.
We do that every day.
And today we will be releasing yet another premium broadcast in video format from two weeks ago like we do every day we do the broadcast, which is Monday through Thursday.
So let's go back to Teal here.
Where I had completed her victimization.
I was the proximate cause of her getting her Nobel Peace Prize, but I think I was the but-for cause.
But for me, she would not have gotten it.
And this is sort of the odd feature of so many of these These super intense debates where you sort of wonder, what is it that is really going on?
What is it that is perhaps really at stake that we should be talking about instead?
And so if I look back on the debates at Stanford at the time, and to some extent these debates, I think they've been fought for decades or centuries.
If we took not the tendentious left-wing, but let's say the sort of bureaucratic university perspective or the establishment perspective, what they would have said in the 1980s, what I think they still in many cases would say today, what they would have said in the 19th century is, yeah, you have all these, you know, Flaky debates in the humanities about reading Shakespeare and reading these books, but, you know, we're doing something much more important.
The university is about progress, progress of knowledge, and it's especially true in the science and technology.
That's where progress is happening, and we can have these side debates about Shakespeare or Rigoberto Menchu, but we're working on string theory and science and the sort of the relief of man's estate, Roger Bacon.
Sir Francis Bacon.
That whole thing.
That's what the university is really all about.
And I think this would have been the technocratic sort of defense Stanford had given of itself in the 80s and 90s.
That, yes, the progress is continuing.
It's continuing very rapidly.
And this is what is sort of what is going on in our society.
And that's what's fundamentally good.
It's the Manhattan Project.
It is the Apollo space program.
It is the progress of humanity.
And as long as we're doing that, you can complain about these sideshows, but it doesn't really matter.
So, so much to unpack there.
I want to try to do it in this last minute before we go over, and then I'll give the cue to my producer.
He talks, what, NASA and paperclip coming out of this technocratic society, Nazi-run stuff.
You know, he talks about it as the elitist viewpoint, the university viewpoint of why these things are good, the progressions.
And what's really interesting to me as we continue with this, he talks about the false promises of science.
And he talks about taboos and dogmas.
I think that this second hour is going to be extremely important, guys.
We're also going to play the Pulver Miletic caged aggression commercial written by chat, GPT and more.
Come on over! We're going to start saying goodbye to everybody.
Alright folks? So all you guys over at Rockfin, I love you and we will see you soon.
Thumbs it up on the way out. Share this over at YouTube as well guys.
And YouTube, that's it for you as well.
Twitter, apparently Twitter was down.
I saw hashtag Twitter down.
Lots of Elon Musk memes.
Lots of Musk or Nuts memes.
▲
Export Selection