Watch the UNCENSORED second hour live on RVM Premium Mon-Thur at 9AM EST:
https://redvoicemedia.com/uncensoredShow more Not RVM Premium yet? Try it for $1:
https://redvoicemedia.com/jason
Listen Live and Call In at:
https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/
Send Some Love and Buy Me A Cup Of Joe:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermas
Watch My Documentaries:
https://www.redvoicemedia.com/category/bermas-docs
Subscribe on Rokfin
https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas
Subscribe on Rumble
https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952
Subscribe on YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior
Follow me on Twitter
https://twitter.com/JasonBermas
PayPal: [email protected]
#BermasBrigade Show less
Hey everybody, Jason Burmes here and the segment you're about to watch is from the second hour of my Red Voice Media daily show Monday through Thursday, 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. reality rants that you can catch for just $10 a month or $100 for the year, get access to all the other great shows and obviously it helps support this broadcast.
So redvoicemedia.com slash uncensored and redvoicemedia.com slash Jason is where you can find that show.
And remember, we give everything away for free.
So two weeks later, if you want to watch it, you just go over to redvoicemedia.com, scroll down, you'll find that broadcast and share it with everybody because it's you, the people out there getting the information to others that makes the difference.
Thank you so much and enjoy the broadcast.
We are on the other side.
So let's continue with this video.
Whatever will we do with automation coming in?
Guaranteed basic incomes have lifted millions out of poverty in Brazil and Mexico.
Switzerland almost passed a bill providing all disemployed citizens with guaranteed basic incomes.
Former FDIC chair Sheila Bear says, fixing the come inequality with $10 million of loans for everyone.
That was in the Washington Post.
We are fortunate today to have with us NASA chief scientist Dennis Bushnell of the Langley Research Center in Virginia, who has written on many of these issues in today's age of automation and machine intelligence.
Welcome, Dennis.
It's very good to see you again.
Thank you for coming.
I mean, look at the little smirk on his face.
Oh, we're going to be talking about the robot takeover.
We're going to be talking about the slavery income.
I love talking about those things.
You know how these economists have been telling us we don't have to worry about automation because there will always be new jobs in the next economy, in the next sector.
But this time, it might be different.
So how do you see all of these issues?
And I have to ask you a question.
How come you at NASA are worrying about these issues of automation and job losses and all of this kind of thing?
Well, because I work for the Defense Department.
And, you know, this whole facade of us going to the moon and Mars is just that, a facade.
I run war game scenarios.
I help to captivate the public's imagination, while in the background, we utilize technology developed by the Defense Department for a number of things.
That's what I'm really about.
Well, there's two answers to that.
One is we're worried about automation because we are relying upon automation to do space exploration.
It's extremely expensive to use humans to do what the machines can do.
And in fact, we have a directive from the National Academies that the humans should only do what the machines cannot do.
So as the machines get better, there's less and less for the humans to do.
I see.
So automation is our bread and butter for space and increasingly for aeronautics.
I see.
In terms of the impacts on society, it's my job as chief scientist to do the future planning for what we should work on with research that will be applied to society 10, 20, and 30 years out.
But in order to determine what we should work on, I need to know what the nature of society is 10, 20, 30 years up.
So, again, that's why his future strategic warfare document, where we ended yesterday on page 35, where we were talking about cyborg fish and wartime robots that eat your biomass to survive.
In other words, eat your corpse on the battlefield.
That's the kind of lovely stuff that this guy's openly involved in, but most people don't even know who he is.
Right.
Well, now, you know, because I sort of come as a futurist trying to look at the whole system, both the social system and the ecosystem, but I admit not very much looking at outer space.
My worries over the last 30 years have really been focused on automation, you know, beginning very early on when we futurists were looking at the automobile industry in the 60s, you know.
And we welcomed automation.
We thought, great, you know, this means we'll have the leisure society, you know, and everybody will learn to play the violin and you know, all that we have shorter and shorter work weeks.
Look how hilarious it is to him.
Yeah, no, we promised you that.
We promised you that you were going to have all this free time and we were going to benefit humanity with automation.
And that just didn't happen, did it?
Of course, it turned out not that way at all.
And so everybody's working two or three jobs and inequality is growing and unemployed people are having to rely on signing up to Task Rabbit, you know.
And of course those are reasonably interim kind of solutions, but those kind of jobs are part-time, there's no security, and so that's not much of a future.
So, you know, I was reading Wired magazine, the current issue, and I saw this photograph, you know, of robots.
And I'm kind of thinking we have all these wonderful human beings with the magnificent brain that 3.8 billion years of evolution on this planet created.
And why on earth are these things relevant here on Earth?
I totally understand why they're relevant on Mars.
Okay.
You have to consider what are the limitations of humans.
Oh, and there are plenty of limitations, don't worry.
And again, if you think that the Atlas robot, right, that they're showing you and the DARPA stuff is for space travel, again, that's the front.
Even though they tell you that the first Americans, if you will, the first of those in space will be the robots, will be the AI, will be the nanobots.
And then don't worry, they're going to surveil Mars.
They'll come back with all the data.
We'll be able to create a virtual Mars for you to visit if you want to.
Seems rather convenient for these people.
Okay.
In the case of driving an automobile, for example, human drivers are often distracted.
They're often inebriated.
They're often tired.
They're often ill.
They often have an argument with a significant other and therefore they're upset.
Machines tend not to be that way.
And in fact, what we're developing this talk is essentially a second intelligent species.
We are developing that second intelligent species that I constantly talk about, that Kurzweil talked about in the Age of Spiritual Machines, that Martine Rothblatt is promoting at the Transformers Conference.
along with what NASA representatives, narrative representatives within big tech, like Twitch and Reddit, and the private contractors like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin.
That's what we're doing.
Duh.
We're creating a second intelligent species.
With the biomimetics, where we're nanosectioning the neocortex and replicating it in silicon, people allege we're 10 to 15 to maybe 20 years max out from having a human-level machine intelligence.
The nanorobotics is giving all the dexterity, human dexterity, and so forth.
So when one looks in the totality of the human versus the robot, the robot knows more.
The robot has a much better safety record.
In aviation, 85% of the safety issues are human factors.
It's clear if you want a safer system, you have less humans.
So if you want a safer system, you have less humans.
And the people at the top already look down on the vast majority of us like we're not humans.
Weird.
The machines so far are more knowledgeable.
The robot that we're using now to do cancer research and the cancer treatments is much better than the human physicians.
We're getting rid of the doctors.
We're getting rid of the humans to drive the planes, drive the cars.
We're getting rid of the doctors.
We're going to get rid of the educators.
We're bringing in robotic everything.
It's not just Chippy and Chipotle, everybody.
The teachers are, in fact, more effective, the robot teachers, in educating children.
They're more creative.
The child has more control and so forth and so on.
The studies show that children learn four to five times faster than they do in the conventional schools.
And that's because conventional schools have a large amount of time keeping order.
The classmates are not always supportive for people who are brainy and intelligent and so forth and so on.
So the total education system for the robot teacher tends to be better.
The robot teacher will keep the order.
Yank!
The robot teacher is going to keep the order.
And really, it's not really a robot in most cases because they want to bring Intella everything.
It will be AI-driven.
What they are doing is trying to take the human out of humanity and the experience.
Grid and Guaranteed Income00:15:36
That's the reality, everybody.
And we're going to make it a lot better.
The robot manufacturing, you talked about the automobile business.
I mean, that's a done deal.
We've gone from 60% manufacturing in the 1950s in the workforce down to 9%, heading to 2%.
So this leads me exactly to the question I worry about.
And that is, what do we do with all of these human beings?
See?
And how I don't think we.
Look at the huge smile.
What do we do with all the human?
Ah!
He really lets his hair down if he had any in these interviews with this woman.
Oh, what do we do with all those human beings?
Cats out of the bag!
Retraining is going to be enough because retraining can't possibly keep up with the speed of the change, you know.
And so I look back to the 1960s when we futurists were saying, well, the only way to keep up aggregate demand in the economy and provide purchasing power broadly enough is to give everybody a guaranteed minimum income, minimum income.
See, even then, he's like, yeah, no, no, no, that's just a mid-part of the plan to kind of placate to you is we have you merge with machines and we fool you into believing that you can somehow upload your consciousness into the virtual arena.
You know, we're going to automate you out for sure.
And this UBI, look, you've been talking about it for years and she talked about how it was creating wealth bullshit.
It's creating slavery.
It's getting rid of your purpose as a human being and it's further empowering automation in a very real transhumanist agenda.
And so I can remember back in the 60s, I actually started a national citizens committee with Robert Theobald, who had written the book Guaranteed Income.
And we said, well, you know, Milton Friedman back then was the first one to propose a guaranteed income.
And he called it the negative income tax.
And he said it was much better to give these people cash, like if they came under a certain amount of money, the IRS sends them a check instead of the other way around.
And then you could do away with all of these social services and all the amelioration and the unemployment and blah, blah, blah.
So what happened.
But they never want to get rid of those systems because the more that you're on those systems, the more you're part of what?
Their command and control system.
You have to jump through the hoops for that check.
You have to take the authoritative, authoritarian mandates they impose on you via societal norms that they invent, okay?
That they dictate.
And we saw what happened during COVID-19 and the medical techno-fascist tyranny.
They not only lauded, they're continually putting into place right now.
Happened, I don't know whether you remember this, but in the 1970s, President Nixon ordered a study of guaranteed income.
And I lived in Princeton at the time, and a Princeton company called Mathematica conducted the study.
And they found, frankly, that it all foundered on the Puritan ethic.
And it was all about no workie, no ET.
And so that went away.
And so then I became very interested in my friend Louie and Patricia Kelso.
And they said, well, look, why don't we have employee-owned companies?
And that way, if the machine takes your job, you can own a piece of the machine.
And now there are 1,100 companies in the U.S. that are owned by their employees.
So what do you think is the right thing to do with all the people who are going to be disemployed?
Okay, well, let's first establish the boundary condition.
The boundary condition, in my estimation, is that as the machines get more intelligent and so forth, there will be essentially no jobs the machines cannot do.
There will be no jobs the machines can't do.
The creative ones, he says, will be the last to go, but they're going.
They're all going.
The machines can do it all.
Chippy!
We currently have creative software that are doing ideation just as good or better than humans now.
The creative jobs will be the last ones to go, but I have not been able to discern any jobs the machines cannot do as machine intelligence and all the rest of the autonomous robotics develops.
So now we're to your question, okay?
What do you do with these people?
There's essentially three options.
You've covered one, which is the guaranteed income.
And the machines can produce the productivity, the wealth necessary to pay this.
It's just the machines do the work instead of the people.
Yes, you have to change the cultural milieu, but this is eventually doable.
It's eventually doable if we have our social engineering to get you to accept a slave income, which you can spend as we say, because it's not going to be the cash system.
No, it's going to be the CBDC system of programmable tokens that only allow you to spend the money in a certain time or in a certain geographic region or on certain goods and services.
But don't worry, we can change society through our social engineering and make this possible.
Well, thank you, Dennis.
This is only one approach.
The second approach is the fact that what's changed since you last looked at this is the whole technology level.
And we humans are now converting ourselves into cyborgs.
We now have artificial retinas, artificial hearts.
We have brain chips.
DARPA's working on brain chips for super soldiers.
We can have a high-bandwidth comp port built in so we don't have to use the sensors and they're very limited bandwidth.
And eventually this all ends up with uploading into the machines.
And instead of us versus them, humans versus the machines, we become them or they become us or you end up with human contaminated machines.
Human contaminated.
I play that part of the clip forever.
Human contaminated machines.
The fact that she's not wide-eyed and being like, wait, Dennis, human-contaminated machines, shouldn't we preserve humanity?
Why are we merging with the machines again?
And I believe the third thing he's going to talk about are really the DIY societies, quote-unquote, on steroids, the people that do not opt into this, that they are not able to cull, all right, that are outside of their system.
And in that respect, you know, the next part kind of gives me a little bit of hope because I'm certainly, you know, if we get to these levels, going to be a part of that type of society.
Now, that's the second one.
The third one is developing in a very interesting way, very rapidly.
And that's the fact, it starts from the fact that in the 1830s, in the agricultural age in this country, some 94% of the workforce were subsistence farmers, and very few people had jobs.
Very few people were employed per se.
Then we got into the Industrial Revolution, moved people to the cities, ruined the social interactions that you had in tightly knit agricultural communities, And learned how to spell alienation.
Okay?
Yeah.
I mean, you got to give him credit.
He's pretty open about it.
He's like, we ruined the relationships built in these agro societies.
Okay?
And we spurned alienation.
I mean, again, the guys give him credit.
He's very honest.
What we have coming now is a very interesting juxtaposition of teleeverything.
People can now telecommute, teletravel, teleeducation, telemedicine, telecommerce, telemanufacturing with the printing manufacturing coming along.
You have people who are now going off all the grids of the water grid, the sewerage grid, the food grid, and the electrical grid.
These are people who can do do-it-yourself on steroids.
It's a revisit, modernization of the old subsistence farms into a self-sufficient electronic cottage where people can manufacture and make and utilize whatever they want without having to buy anything from anybody.
Well, you know.
And again, that's the 3D printing revolution.
This is what Kurzweil sells you on when he's telling you the truth that overpopulation isn't a thing and that once we hit this area of technology where we're actually using renewables, right?
And I'm not talking about a carbon-based credit system.
I'm talking about the real renewables that could empower us.
Sun is the one, guys.
And he says we only have to, you know, tap into about one ten thousandth of the sun's power and do that by 2030.
And basically our entire energy problem is solved and the population problem is solved because you can live anywhere and we've only used about 5% of the usable land.
Unfortunately, Dennis doesn't take to that ilk.
He still thinks that we're overpopulated.
He still goes with that sustainability agenda.
He's just letting you know that this may be one of the options for others.
You know, if they decide not to automate everybody out and you decide not to what?
Bow down to, bend the knee to take part in this transhumanist agenda where you merge with machines.
It's very interesting because I kind of came upon that vision very, very early myself.
And I decided, okay, the transition is going to be away from this centralized industrial fossil-fueled kind of economy where everybody has to live in cities or, you know, and really you could decentralize with solar energy, wind power, energy efficiency, all the new technologies, new batteries, and basically go from the old electric grid, you know,
to microgrids and people generating the electricity off their rooftops.
And I love the idea, you know, of the maker revolution, the book that Chris Anderson wrote a couple of years ago.
And so I agree that that probably is the optimal future scenario.
And by the way, the makers movement is something that Martine Rothblatt discusses when we're discussing artificial intelligence, robotics, and the creation of the entities that Bushnell discussed right here.
But it's getting from here to there that's going to be the problem, in my view.
There's going to be kind of like a 20, 30 year old transition.
And the problem right now is the incumbent fossil fuel industry and all of their client politicians in Washington whom they pay campaign funds to.
And we have right now in the Congress 93, no, 73, last time I looked, climate deniers.
But they don't just deny that the planet is atmosphere is warming and the oceans are warming.
They don't even believe in evolution.
And so they are stopping the solar transition that I write about all the time.
When I was at OTA, I first realized all these possibilities in the 70s.
And basically, they're holding it up.
They have, I can remember Jim Fletcher, who used to be an administrator.
I mean, sometimes when Dennis just sits there, he does have that robotic look, doesn't he?
And he laughs about them not believing in evolution.
Well, Dennis has also told you in 2018 that basically natural evolution is over of all species, not just human beings, and that human beings have now taken control of evolution.
And one of the things that we discussed via the NASA document he wrote back in 2001 is directed evolution, the future strategic warfare document, folks.
NASA, I served with him for six years, and he used to tell us, you know, if we had given enough the same amount of subsidies to solar, wind, energy efficiency, geothermal, OTEC, all of that, as we have given to oil, coal, gas, and nukes, he said that the U.S. could have been a total renewable energy-driven economy by the mid-1970s.
And here we are, we're still fighting this.
That's all true.
It's all true.
We could have done it.
We didn't want to empower humanity, unfortunately.
And he's going to talk about, I think he talks about here, if I remember correctly, the cycle of politics and Wall Street's involvement.
The truth is that the people at the very top, the predator class that controls everything, don't want to empower humanity.
Don't want them to have cheap renewable energy because what?
That creates a society of independence and abundance for the class of people they don't even consider people.
They consider you the bugs they want you to eat.
That's why they didn't come to fruition.
The actual point of fact case today with regard to subsidies is that the subsidies for the fossil carbon is now four to five times what it is for the renewables.
What's changed, and the word hasn't gotten yet to the politicians, but it will.
Costs Plummeting?00:02:06
What's changed is thanks to the research started partnering in the Carter years and since then that the renewables in terms of efficiency, but particularly in terms of cost, okay,
and particularly over the last four years, the costs have plummeted to the point where, except for photovoltaics, and that'll be here within a couple of years, the renewables are all less costly than fossil carbon.
People are shutting down coal plants, okay?
The climate denial is a large percentage, I think, associated with pure economics.
The climate denial is just pure economics.
Again, you're a denier if you don't buy into their command control system that carbon dioxide is the evil poison.
He's not talking about all the estrogen mimickers.
He's not talking about the pharmacological drugs.
He's not talking about the mercury runoff from the coal.
No, it's all carbon.
These damn deniers.
With suck cost, with stranded assets, and all the effect of that financial business has on the whole political process.
And now, today, as we sit here, 70% of all of the new generation capacity worldwide is now renewable energy.
I know.
And in the last two months, 100% of the U.S. new capacity has been renewable energy.
So renewable energy has what?
Okay, it's just that that victory hasn't yet percolated up to the political process.
So what you're seeing, I think, is the last gasp of the old order.
Yeah.
Well, you know, we think that too.
Copenhagen's Global Shift00:07:57
And that's why we produced the Green Transition Scoreboard.
And we thought, you know, we started that for the 2009 Copenhagen Climate Conference.
And we knew it was going to be a train wreck, you know.
And we knew.
Which it was a train wreck because a bunch of their top doctors had their emails published where you found out they were hoaxing.
They were hoaxing.
That's why, you know what?
You know, I have my film queued up, but I want to keep that queued up as well.
And the problem is if I go to home now, there's Invisible Empire.
Perfect, because we're off air.
And let's see if we can bring up the Copenhagen Climate New World Order summit right here and their scam, okay?
And their population control scam.
That's what it is.
Okay.
There's the Copenhageners right here.
Okay.
Let's see if we can get there.
There's the Barack Star.
There's the Chinese style New World Order.
And here's my graphic for Copenhagen.
Nice little picture of Mao.
Let's go to that clip right now.
Air State Building, once a proud symbol of the United States, was lit in the colors of the Communist Party halfway across the world.
In fact, following the United Nations Copenhagen Conference in December of 2009, the Washington Post ran the headline, Copenhagen climate deal shows New World Order may be led by U.S., China.
The Copenhagen conference was disguised as a summit that would save the planet from man-made global warming by cutting carbon emissions.
When taking a look at the almost 200-page document that was being proposed, it becomes evident that this was yet another attempt to establish global government and set up a global tax.
In section 38, it states, the scheme for the new institutional arrangement under the convention will be based on three basic pillars, government, facilitative mechanism, and financial mechanism.
In Section 47, subsection F, it discusses cap-and-trade schemes and carbon taxes and the use of new and existing flexible carbon market mechanisms.
These cap-and-trade schemes were just that, a scheme to further transfer the wealth from the poor to the ultra-rich.
One of the ways it will drive the change is through global governance and global agreements.
The fact that our president even attended should be considered treason.
Just weeks before the conference, ClimateGate hit the media.
Secret emails confirmed that many of the United Nations' lead scientists had engaged in fraud in order to promote the idea that man-made global warming was occurring and that carbon dioxide was a toxic gas.
In reality, they admitted the Earth had been cooling for the last decade and that they had destroyed the source data in order to ensure the scientific community would be unable to review their findings.
Bill Jones was forced to resign from his position at East Anglia University, and Penn State has launched an investigation into Michael Mann.
Because of the scandal, many countries refused to sign the agreement, and instead, only 25 heads of state, including rock star president and savior Barack Obama, signed a much shorter and broader accord.
The document.
A new hope in the clouds is God on the rolling stone cover, saving us from climate disasters.
The document states that a high-level panel will be created and that parties will be subject to domestic auditing, supervision, and assessment.
The climate conference in Copenhagen is another step towards the global management of our planet.
Dude's got like the face, like if you burned his face off, feel like an Indiana Jones film.
He looks like Slender Man, right?
Oh, the climate mechanism refined finances, yes.
The idea that carbon dioxide, the life force for plants here on Earth, is a toxic gas and should be taxed, is laughable.
There have been numerous periods of time in which the Earth has had vastly more carbon in the atmosphere than present day.
In areas where there have been volcanic eruptions which emit large amounts of CO2, plants have benefited, and there is no negative impact on the surrounding environment, as well as indigenous people from the excess carbon dioxide.
You want to see more?
Invisible Empire is free.
Let's go back to Bushnell and the gang talking automation and human-contaminated machines and, of course, climate change.
Although 193 countries were naming and blaming and shaming each other, we knew that they were leaving on the table the one thing they all agreed about.
They knew they would have to move to a low-carbon kind of economy.
But the shift to renewables, this is very important.
The shift to renewables has little to do with climate consciousness or anything to do with climate renewables.
It's purely economics.
Yes.
Well, and we're going to have to also fix the ecosystem, which is crash.
Oh, it's the ecosystem.
And the ecosystem's always crashing because there's too many people doing too many things, according to Ted Turner.
Maybe we should continue playing that down because that's exactly what happens: Ted Turner lets us know.
Because Ted Turner and Warren Buffett and Bill Gates, they decide.
They decide how we should live.
The globalists promote this theory to keep mankind in fear, not only for the establishment of a global government and a global carbon tax, but the literal control of the entire planet.
An even darker side to the scam of man-made global warming exists.
In reality, it's about population control.
Ted Turner reveals himself here in this interview with Charlie Rose.
We've got to stabilize the population.
When I was born, with too many people.
That's why we have global warming.
We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff.
We've got to stabilize the population on a voluntary basis.
Everybody in the world's got to pledge to themselves that one or two children is it.
Not doing it will be catastrophic.
We'll have eight degrees, will be eight degrees hotter in 10 again.
This interview, well over 10 years old now, just to let everybody know.
Not 10, but in 30 or 40 years, and basically none of the crops will grow.
Most of the people will have died, and the rest of us will be cannibals.
Civilization will have broken down.
The few people left will be living in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan.
And living conditions will be intolerable.
The droughts will be so bad, there'll be no more corn growing.
Not doing it is suicide.
Unbelievably, when Turner met with other globalists, David Rockefeller, Warren Buffett, Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, and even Oprah Winfrey to discuss population control, they were portrayed as superheroes.
Behind closed doors on this New York campus, a secret gathering of some of the world's most powerful people.
Gates, Buffett, Bloomberg, Winfrey.
It was like, well, it was like the Super Friends.
In the great hall of the Justice League, there are assembled the world's four greatest heroes.
Together with others at the meeting, including George Soros, Ted Turner, David Rockefeller, they're worth more than $125 billion.
The new Superman and Wonder Woman, the super rich friends, not fighting bad guys, but fighting for good nonetheless.
I mean, he loves Captain Planet.
When I say he, I'm talking about Ted Turner.
But does anything want to make you throw up in your mouth more than watching a culturally appropriated Wonder Woman via Oprah?
Or, you know, maybe the Green Lantern and Bill Gates fit because you have that psychopathic Hal Jordan storyline where he like just went around and killed a bunch of people.
Pushing Power Companies' Assets00:05:37
Remember that?
And then, yeah, no, Ted Turner's Superman and Warren Buffett's Batman.
And I got to agree, if I was going to slap a superhero costume on Mike Bloomberg, it would definitely be Aquaman.
All right.
Back to Bushnell.
We're probably going to wrap it up soon, guys.
For some reason, I am sitting here sweaty.
I got to be honest with everybody.
My alarm didn't go off.
I got up last minute.
I looked at my clock.
It was like 6.15 in the morning my time.
I was going live in 45 minutes.
Not great, folks.
Not great.
And then we get in there and I connect and all of a sudden my video's not working.
I got to reconnect.
I'm muting myself when I shouldn't.
Not the best reality rants.
I hope that you can forgive me out there, Burmese Brigade.
I hope you can forgive me out there, Red Voice premium subscribers.
Hopefully, hopefully, you're enjoying the content regardless.
But it's the new economy.
People come up to me and say, if I did X, Y, or Z, would that affect the ecosystem?
And I said, only if X, Y, and Z saves money, is financially curative.
Well, you're looking now at the new economics.
And what we teach asset managers here at Ethical Markets, we teach asset managers about internalizing all those external costs on which the fossil fuel industry was based.
There never would have been a fossil fuel industry if they had not been able to externalize all of the costs, the health costs, the environmental costs.
And that's now changing.
It's changing the game.
If you really want to be successful, and this is what the renewables have done, you play the game on their turf.
That's what we do.
As opposed to changing the game, changing the valuations And so forth and so on.
Yes, I agree with you.
That would have been good.
But in terms of being efficacious, in terms of having things instituted in real time, in the last four years, there has been a vertical revolution in the, literally, in the renewables, and it's totally because the price has plummeted.
And part of the reason for that is that the last 20 years, the socially responsible investment movement, which I have been involved in, has now reached the point where one out of every $6 invested on Wall Street is in companies in renewables and that don't have heavy social and environmental costs.
And the new driver, which is now pushing the stranded asset debate and frightening the asset managers with the whole idea of devaluation of their portfolios, is coming from students as well, who are saying, you know, divest.
Basically, those are the people that have been brainwashed into the sustainability movement that Bushnell's been pushing for over a decade on behalf of what?
Population control and bringing you into the virtual age via a transhumanist movement.
Those forces change things without changing winners and losers.
Right, exactly.
But it's a confluence of those forces now that are coming to bear on asset managers.
They're terrified of all of the forces out there, and they're also terrified of the stranded assets and that their portfolios may lose value if they don't shift to the renewables.
The distributed generation for electricity and energy is worrying the power companies greatly.
And several of them have said that they're seriously thinking in terms of a business plan going forward of selling internet access over these wires as opposed to electricity because they know people will no longer be buying this.
And that would be great because it would take, it would break up the duopoly that we're dealing with here in a small southern city of ATT and Comcast, who are denying us broadband, and so we would just love that.
But also, they have an interim strategy.
EPRI has an interim strategy now for the big power companies, and that is pushing electrical vehicles.
And what we're saying is, okay, we are with you on electrical vehicles, but they must be funded, they must be powered by renewable energy-generated electricity.
Never going to happen.
That's the big joke.
Not possible.
If we can make that deal.
You can power electric vehicles or hybrids, better off.
The Brits make a bioreactor that you put in your backboards, you put it in your sewer, your kitchen scraps, your yard waste, and that's where you get your fuel.
It's hard in a residential setting to generate enough electricity to power a vehicle.
Oh, yeah, but I mean, the point is that those electric power companies.
The point is that the vast majority of the electricity used for the electric car, et cetera, are not renewables.
Okay, but they want to starve you out.
They want your standard living to plummet.
They want the energy costs to shoot through the roof.
Energy From Waste00:00:53
Look what's happening in Europe.
Look what's happening in this country with oil and gas.
Period.
It is real.
All right, folks, I am going to wrap it up.
I will be back tomorrow.
I hope I'm going to be locking in an interview for the second hour.
We'll see if we get there.
Like I said, we had Randy Ireland on yesterday.
I would encourage you to check out all the other great premium material here at RedVoicemedia.com, including the Alicia Powell Show and, of course, Self-Defense Warrior with Jeffrey Wilson and Pat Militich.
I am Jason Burmes.
We will be back tomorrow.
I hope you check out the documentary films.
Or if you've never seen Bushnell, if you're new to the program, check him out as well.
But Loose Change, Final Cut, Shade the Motion Picture, Invisible Empire, a New World Order to Find.
And, of course, Fabled Enemies, all free of charge.