All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 14, 2022 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
54:31
Musk’s Brain Chip Show And Tell With Jay Dyer - UNCENSORED Reality Rants With Jason Bermas
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey everybody, Jason Burmus here.
And what you're about to watch is a segment from the second hour over at redvoicemedia.com from a couple weeks back.
Now I want to remind everybody, every two weeks, the full thing goes free over at redvoicemedia.com, uncensored, even if you're not a premium subscriber.
If you want to listen to it in real time, you can still do so over at theinfowarrior.podbean.com.
But four days a week, that means even if you're not...
A premium member, that's almost two hours of content.
And this one was just too damn important, in my opinion, not to share after the fact.
Now if you're watching on Rockfin and Rumble, it's completely uncensored and you get the full second hour.
Unfortunately, if you're watching on YouTube, there's a lot of content in there that might go against the misinformation standards of today.
You know, from the Ministry of Digital Truth.
So, I hope you enjoy this segment.
It's an important one.
You want to support me, go to redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
Try the first week out for a buck.
And that's ten bucks a month.
Or lock it in right there.
Really support me.
At redvoicemedia.com slash Jason and get a year for $100.
We're not going anywhere.
In fact, you'll see me bright and early, 8 a.m.
Eastern Time tomorrow morning, Monday through Thursday, doing it big.
So, guys, check it out.
Under the duress of you losing your job, right, you losing your home, they were really...
Able to institute a global biomedical tyranny the likes of which we've never seen.
It was really also the first step in what you were talking about in mutating human beings by getting them to accept that first level of transhumanism via mRNA, which, guys, I hate to tell you, yeah, it affects your DNA. It changes what you are.
That's a real thing.
Speak to that. Yeah, I remember in the midst of the COF, I was surprised to see that when you go to the World Economic Forum, they even put out a big whole essay explaining what these vaccines do.
So the World Economic Forum itself said, are these mRNA vaccines that change your genetics?
Yes, they are, and they are experimental, but they're also cool, right?
So, I mean, they were admitting in the midst of the pandemic that This isn't really what you've thought of as a previous so-called vaccine, which those themselves also had problems because if you go back to the father of inoculations himself, Jonah Salk, I've got his two books over on my shelf.
One of them is called... Man unfolding.
And the other one that's more relevant is called survival of the wisest.
And in that he says that we can change and mutate human beings through these inoculations, right?
So everybody thinks of him as the hero that solved the polio crisis or whatever.
But in reality, he says in his own books that the purpose of mass inoculations is a giant science experiment.
And he says that we're going to have to experiment even on women and their children in the womb.
And we're just going to do it through vaccines.
So the reason that all the women when they're pregnant get so many vaccines is because it's a science experiment.
And so that's what Salk says in his books.
The Salk Institute, that comes from Jonas Salk.
I remember one time when I first analyzed that book, I think in 2015 or 2016, and I put that video at the time up on Twitter.
I had a doctor from, a prominent doctor from a major media outlet come after me and was interacting with me on Twitter.
And he said that the book doesn't exist.
And I'm like, I have the book right here.
I show the book in the video.
And he says, you are making these things up.
There is no such book.
Just gaslighting.
Just trying to literally, I've got the book in my hand.
It exists.
I assure you it exists.
It's out of print, but it does exist.
And that's what they do, right?
They will just lie to your face when you try to confront establishment people about this.
And the catalyzing events that we're talking about, right?
This is the type of thing that's in the...
So I've got my Lockstep Rockefeller whole document right here ready to go.
And they call them shocks.
I think they call them disruptive shocks.
Same idea as a catalyzing event.
And disruptive shocks are what allow the system to move very quickly to the next phase.
It's very similar to wartime, right?
So if you remember, if you've listened to Catherine Austin Fitz, you know, she talked about plague laws.
And plague laws allowed for the government to have these really overreaching powers that they couldn't justify in any other way.
Well, pandemic laws are the exact same thing.
Emergency. Oh, we're in an emergency.
So, by the way, we have to, you know, mass vaccinate you.
Yeah, we have to do everything to violate all your rights in every sense.
Oh, because it's an emergency. And so the first scenario of the disruptive shocks, the catalyzing events, is a massive pandemic.
And it says this will initiate top-down control.
That's what the lockstep document says, the very first thing it says right here.
This scenario will initiate total top-down control.
And it speculates that this might occur between 2010 to 2025.
Okay, well, this document was 2010.
We're in 2020, 2022, right?
That's COVID. So it pretty much is spot on in terms of when this would come about.
And then it says that this will help to lead to greater cooperation for a world order.
The first thing it says is that China is the key.
China will be the test ground from which the rollout of all of this lockstep scenario will occur.
Well, shocker, Wuhan lab, that's where we first saw all this rollout.
That's exactly what it says on the first page of lockstep is China.
So hopefully you can see that right there.
China is the key.
They said they'll shut down flights across the world.
So I think COVID was in many ways a first test of a rollout of a global government response.
And the document says they will roll out face masks to test and see if people accept that.
They'll have temperature checks everywhere.
All of these controls, it says, won't just go away, but in many ways they will stay in place.
So even though masks might have gone away, the idea that now everybody can have a centralized control tell you that you'll wear a mask, that stays.
And so you better believe they're going to roll all this stuff back out.
It says biometric IDs will be rolled out.
That's the vaccine. They attempted to roll out the vaccine passports.
Mandates. Pandemic mandates.
Here's a weird one that I was getting into you with the other day.
There will be less cars and less driving because now we're going to realize that the lockdowns help the environment, right?
And that the environment can heal from all of the human, you know, humans are bad, right?
So now we're going to have to get rid of cars.
People overlook this in the lockstep.
But it says that you're not going to have cars anymore.
And they're going to use the carbon healing that occurred as a result of the lockdowns, right?
So this was all planned a long time ago as a giant scam.
It's all bullshit.
Well, you know what's funny?
Have you seen, have I played the Earth 2100 clip for you?
From the beginning of that?
I'm not sure.
So Earth 2100 was a public partnership with the government where they created this scenario,
I think it was with ABC News, where they had this cartoon drawn out
with this person that was drawn, or born in I believe in 2009, right?
And they're going through this 100 years and it's all, everything's getting worse
and humans are bad and we gotta lock it down and they have smaller and smaller houses
and there's all these disasters and their cars get worked out, refugee camps.
But the first, 60 seconds of it is incredible because it starts with, I survived New York under full quarantine.
And then it shows everybody on the West Coast wearing the same masks that they implemented.
So this is in 2009 preparing you.
And then the people that are actually in it...
Are people like Van Jones, the $10 million Bezos man, John Podesta, who just got another spot in the Biden administration, obviously notorious.
Anthony Fauci in there talking about all these viruses that are going to come from climate change.
Eric Schmidt, the former CEO and chair of Google.
James Woolsey. The ex-head of the Central Intelligence Agency.
So let's just play the first 10 seconds of this bad boy.
And just like lockstep, it predicted all these things.
But now we've incorporated into what Jay just talked about.
Climate change, not just viruses.
In my life, I've seen New York City under full quarantine.
The Midwest overrun, devastated by pests.
Plagues sweep across California.
And then...
And then it happened.
So again, the timeline's right in front of you, but it's not a timeline of 100 years.
It's really what they want to truncate into the next 20 to 30 years in that 2025, 2030, and eventually 2040 initiative, which really, if they have their way, will be In a full move to transhumanism and really allowing these people to take over human biology altogether.
You may not legally be able to have children anymore, Jay.
Well, I remember you did a video on the robot caregivers, right?
Yes. That's in lockstep right here.
It says that they'll roll out immigrant and robot caregivers.
Yeah. So...
Hold on, we're going to come back to you right now.
Yeah, as you go up to 2017, you have the rollout of the CareBots up into 2022.
This is when it starts to...
They're basically saying that after this scenario, technology, the next page, is technology begins to work in lockstep with every area of life after this pandemic.
So... The point of all that was that then they say that the people will, in the various countries, cry out for a solution.
So it even says that it'll be heavy-handed.
And when everybody cries out for a solution, it's saying that the establishment will be there ready with their problem-reaction solution, which they had planned all along, which is more and more technocracy.
And they're going to argue that the problem was nation states.
The problem was national governments.
The problem was your elected officials.
And so the selling point is look how much your elected officials failed.
That's why you need a AI managerial technocratic run centralized government because it won't fail like these stupid politicians.
That was the purpose of all the COVID and all this stuff.
That's the purpose. So as this rolls out, there have already been these initiatives in place.
We talk about the TrackTrace Database Surveillance Society.
You just showed the idea of these nurse robots.
They're trying to incorporate the blockchain into this via smart contracts.
Now the IMF and others are openly talking about the CBDC market.
And I'm unsure if you've seen this latest clip.
Where this IMF executive clearly states that this will manage the food that you can eat and what can be purchased with these tokens.
So let's play this quick.
I've been playing a lot, but it's an important clip to play.
The third way we think CBDC can improve financial inclusion is through what we call programmability.
That is, CBDC can allow Government agencies and private sector players to program, to create smart contract, to allow targeted policy functions.
For example, welfare payment.
For example, consumption coupon.
For example, food stamps.
By programming CBDC, those money can be precisely targeted for what kind of people can own and what kind of use this money can be utilized.
Let's talk about that because obviously our monetary system right now is far from perfect.
but there is still a barter and trade aspect to it and individual transactions that cannot only be
not be track traced and database if done correctly but they certainly cannot be regulated
as to what you can spend that currency on and who with and even geographically locate this.
Right now we're in the midst of probably the biggest inflationary crisis of our lifetimes. The biggest global
economic upheaval which clearly
was done by design via the COVID-1984 nightmare. In your view as they
you know we're in the rollout phase of a lot of this technology, how far we
actually from this next step to be instituted in this global plan?
Because when we are talking about a quote-unquote new world order and globalization and global governance, You know, programmable, tokenized, monetary systems where you can just create zeros and ones essentially out of nowhere is at kind of the apex of their control structure.
Yeah, exactly. So we're not far from that.
And ironically, to be clear, so in the lockstep document, it's not saying there's four phases, one, two, three, four in this order.
It's presenting four scenarios that could occur at any time or could all occur together, right?
Yeah. And so the next scenario, ironically, it's called clever together after lockstep, is the scenario that fits very well with what you're talking about with CBDCs.
And this is going to be big in terms of this narrative about carbon and carbon control.
Right. So remember when CUFID happened, as we said, when they did all the lockdowns, they immediately started saying, look how good it was for the planet.
Look how the carbon emissions dropped and life.
Earth came back to life and cities were green again and all this stuff.
That's all by design to have, as this document says, eventually every corporation will have carbon officers that police that corporation.
To fulfill their carbon rations and strictures, right?
And then it goes on to say that enormous benign surveillance systems, they're benign, so don't
worry about it, will be erected in real time in every place across every nation state.
And this will be because after the scenarios, these bad scenarios, these cataclysms, we're
going to realize the need for, you got it, world government.
But it says that the world government that might come into play here would be run, I'm not joking, by Big Pharma.
And benevolent non-governmental organizations.
It literally goes into talking about big pharma and that this would all be centered around everybody getting vaccines.
And being completely and fully inoculated.
And that will help everything to go green because don't you trust the corporate...
But don't you trust Pfizer to run the government?
I'm not joking. Imagine a dystopia where Pfizer runs things and it's all done outside of government.
Government is just something else.
This, as it says, will be a private corporate government.
So basically fascism.
But they're calling it a philanthropic fascism.
So remember, public-private partnership, right, where the corporations run thing, that is fascism.
But no, you see, it's a philanthropic one.
You know what I like about it, Jay?
I like that it has a nice ring to it in that Bernaysian tone of safe and effective.
It's clever together, huh?
These are all just selling points, exactly.
Then it goes on to say that the cities that exist will be socialist.
Literally, it calls it socialist smart cities.
And in the social smart cities, you will have everything, including your water, your transportation, your electricity controlled Buy the central hub in the smart city.
And all of that data will be tracked and traced in a total surveillance grid for your good to help you not hurt the planet.
And get this, your economics will all be controlled, tracked, and traced by digital currency.
Not Bitcoin. Not other cryptos.
The CBDC crypto.
FedCoin or PharmaCoin, right?
Not Fed. Or Global SlaveryCoin.
I mean, you know, you talked about these cities.
Are you aware of the Neom project and the line?
Yes. I did a video on Neom when they first announced it.
And Neom is exactly what they're talking about here.
So here's the section where it talks about...
Everything being controlled in the smart city right here by the central grid.
And then it's hinting at the digital currency down at the bottom.
They don't call it CBDC because this was in 2010.
So they just talk about payments, rapid payment systems.
They call it rapid mobile payment.
Let's play the Neom clip for those that don't understand what they want to do and how this is incorporated into that carbon footprint idea.
Say they're going to consolidate everything, how everything will be 15 minutes away, and they're using that pop culture buzzword terminology.
You think clever together is good.
Oh, we've got equity.
We've got diversity.
You'll be able to access nature and equitable views, everybody.
A revolution in civilization is taking place.
Imagine a traditional city and consolidating its footprint, designing to protect and enhance nature.
The Lions communities are organized in three dimensions within five-minute walk neighborhoods.
Travel end-to-end in 20 minutes.
Designed by world-leading architects, the line is 500 meters tall, 200 meters wide, 170 kilometers long, and housed within an elegant mirror glass facade.
The line is designed as a series of unique communities, providing equitable views and immediate access to the surrounding nature.
At the heart of the globe's key trade routes, a place for commerce and communities to thrive.
And the thing that's crazy about that Is that, you know, they talk about, oh, you'll be able to go end-to-end with this technology.
First of all, if we were using maglev trains in this country properly, we'd have empowered the populace, right?
You could have a job, say, in New York State or Pennsylvania, and you could live in Ohio because you could commute there in 30 or 40 minutes via these train systems.
We've never done that infrastructure.
But, hey, if we get you into a nice compressed slave grid line...
We'll let you have that technology to go up and down.
And then you look at this thing.
Oh, and it's got a sleek glass outside.
It looks like an iPhone.
Who gives a flying fuck?
How the hell does that help anybody?
It's the nuttiest thing.
Other ads and the website itself very much reminds me of this idea of the metaverse where they have this Asian woman flying throughout the city and nature is surrounded and you can go everywhere.
They're almost selling you on that 70s cosmonaut Soviet ideal in this next sense of equity and growth.
The green agenda where we're going to have these societies now that, again, enhance NatureJ.
Yeah, did you see that there was a new, on the Gateway Pundit, there's an article up that smart cities worldwide are going to be converted into open concentration camps, says ex-Silicon Valley engineer turned whistleblower.
Look up that headline if you haven't seen it.
Oh, Joe Hoft wrote it?
No, my girlfriend works at the Gateway Pundit.
I'm sure she'll be sending it to me later today.
Yeah, so there you go, right?
And this is something that I did a video.
When they announced NEOM, I did a video and tied it into the movie Logan's Run because Logan's Run is a prison smart city, right?
It's a classic 70s dystopia.
It's based on a book, but it's a goofy cheeseball 70s movie, but it has this whole idea of there's an AI grid that runs this city that's become a prison.
And it's centuries into the future, and human beings don't even know that they're imprisoned in the city.
They just think it's their normal life.
And the person that created it was a eugenicist, and he created it to be perfectly sustainable and balanced so that you voluntarily die when you're age 30.
And they have this big ceremony and you float up into this, you know, thing that cooks you.
And I've been saying this entire time just from the dystopian stories before I read the actual white papers.
Right. I grew up reading a lot of books and watching a lot of movies.
And so I just from watching movies, I was like smart cities.
That's going to be a freaking prison, dude.
That's going to be a dystopian prison.
It's so obvious, right?
It's like you're a rat in a maze, right?
That's what you are. You're a rat in a maze for the scientists.
And now people are admitting this.
And that's because, I mean, the white papers say it's going to be basically a prison.
You're going to even probably, I would imagine the future they're going to offer, you know, if you will be sterilized, you'll get lifetime credits.
Or if you'll be sterilized, we'll give you, you know, a million dollars, a million credits, but you have to be cooked or euthanized or turned into, you know, soil and green.
In the next five years, they're going to start offering these things, right?
They've just now offered the euthanasia programs in Canada.
They're going to keep rolling out other versions of this.
And for the smart cities, it'll be things like you'll get extra credits if you sterilize yourself, this kind of stuff.
And it's not just keep in mind.
It's not just tracking, tracing, controlling of your electricity and your water and your transportation.
Your diet will be completely changed.
So I couldn't believe it when I was looking at one of the globalists, Toffler.
So in Toffler's books, he talks about, but he wrote in the 70s and 80s, that they would use the vegan movement The vegan movement to promote world government.
And I remember reading that years ago.
I was like, how are you going to use the vegan movement to promote?
That doesn't make any sense.
And he says, what we're going to do is, we're going to study, and at Stanford Research, they put out a paper on this too in the 70s.
They were studying the counterculture movements that were new back at that time.
They were studying anarcho-punk movements.
And they were studying vegan diet vegetarian movements.
And they realized that if you took these two philosophies, anarcho-veganism, and you put them together, that this could be a very powerful tool for social engineering down the road.
That was in the 70s and 80s they were talking about that.
So here we are now, and I think it was 2020 when The Economist and all these big global elite publications, they suddenly started rolling out Greta and Beyonce and all these people who had suddenly become vegan.
They're not vegan.
That's all bullshit and it's just propaganda.
I guarantee you Jay-Z and Beyonce are not vegan.
They're eating better than any of us will ever eat, right?
But they convinced all these people to sell it, and I think it was The Economist or one of those big publications that said, oh, this is the year of veganism, 2020.
And the reason it's the year of veganism is because it's part of the document, it's part of this, to completely alter and change the humanity.
Oh, we lost Dyer.
Hopefully he's going to jump back in.
There he is. Can you hear me?
Yeah, we got you. You know, speaking to the euthanasia aspect, I'm not sure if you've seen this commercial, and it's now been put private on YouTube, but they're glorifying suicide.
Canadian fashion company is slammed for dystopian media campaign that promotes youth in Asia as country prepares to openly open up assisted death to the mentally ill.
And I did watch it before it got privatized.
Here it is right here, guys. Basically, this woman is amongst whales and the beauty and she's talking about the beauty of life and she's on a beach with loved ones and friends and at the final dinner and it's empowering that she's brave enough to take her own life.
And I want to vomit when I see this.
But this is how we're being socially engineered and prepared for these next steps that are now taking place in places like Canada with this new policy.
Have you seen the commercial? Yes, it's just like if you've seen Soylent Green.
If you remember in Soylent Green, Charlton Heston's character is sort of mentored by this older guy who's like a librarian.
And the librarian guy eventually capitulates to the euthanasia center because he's just tired of being against the dystopia.
And he decides, oh, I'm done.
I'm not kidding.
When he goes to the euthanasia center, it's exactly like this ad.
It's pretty creepy. That's like a 1978 movie.
But the scene where he lays down in a bed and they play this beautiful scenery and this music, it's just like in this creepy ad.
Ugh, dude, I watched it and it was the worst.
Dyer, we've been going a little over an hour.
I don't want to keep you too much longer.
We were talking, I thought I'd have fun with this before we go back to Musk and the no fun and do a watch along with his brain chip rollout.
You like to do analysis of movies, films.
I'm a film buff myself.
Have you seen Nope yet?
Nope. I did see Nope, yeah.
So, have we discussed what I believe to be the hidden meaning of Nope yet?
No, tell me. Alright.
So, if you haven't noticed in the film, there is an overarching theme of space and NASA and the color scheme and even Jupiter's, I forget what it's called, but that's the cowboy place of the childhood actor that also...
He had his own, the Gordy's Home show, which is based in a family of astronauts, by the way.
And they don't let you know that, but there's a lot of stuff outside of the movie, so they actually did a trailer for Gordy's Home that you can watch where you find out it is a family of astronauts, and obviously Gordy is a monkey and all that other stuff.
And... It's a big nod to Kubrick, number one.
When they first go to the office, remember there's a hidden room, just like there's the secret room in The Shining, and that room is the space room, right?
And that's kind of where I think the hidden meaning of the movie is.
And spoiler alert for anybody who hasn't seen it, we're going to spoil some things for people, is basically what we know about NASA and aliens is largely a contrived Hollywood fate, right?
So some of the other underlying themes of it is Hollywood chewing you up and spitting you out.
That's what that quote-unquote alien is.
But remember, it's not even really an alien.
It's something from nature.
So when they do present aliens at the same time, right, they have the alien heads, but they're in the monkey outfits.
And that's from 2001 A Space Odyssey as well.
When they do the Gordy's Home pan, The entire place is basically the opening shot.
You can check it out, but later on they go back to that same shot.
The three cameras that are rolling, the PanVision cameras, represent the three kids in the alien costumes.
The heads of the cameras look exactly like the alien thing.
There's actually a website.
For the Jupiter's cavern or whatever it is.
And in it, they reference as above, so below.
There's an obsession with getting the alien on film, right?
So there's all these different levels of the Hollywoodization of NASA. And if you actually go back to the beginning of the movie...
The first thing that is in the audio in the background is the conversation about him sending rockets to space but not being able to pick out a birthday present.
So, yeah, exactly.
So, when I say he, they're talking about the Gordy's home scene where everybody gets butchered.
So the very first thing you hear is about space, essentially, this guy's supposed to be brilliant
sending rockets into space, but he can't even pick out the right birthday present for a monkey.
I would check it out under that perspective. I didn't love the movie. In fact, there were a lot
of things about it that reminded me of The Shining. I was never really impressed with The Shining,
the first run through. And then I started realizing what I had watched.
I watched it a second time.
And then I watched some of the stuff that got cut out.
And I watched the Gordy's Home trailer and the website really kicked it off for me.
Because there's definitely an as above, so below.
A lot of hidden meanings in it.
And I'd go back and re-watch it with that in mind.
Because I think you're going to see a lot of NASA stuff.
And maybe we should do a whole broadcast on that in the future.
A fun one! Where we're not talking about the dystopian future of humanity, folks.
Jay Dyer, jaysanalysis.com is where people can go.
What do you have coming up?
How can people support you? Yeah, so we just did, like I said, a big super-duper podcast last night with a couple big wigs, heavy hitters.
So that'll be coming up in the next couple days.
And what I have coming up, I'll be hosting Alex Jones tomorrow, 2 p.m.
So you can check that out over at band.video.
And then if you want my books, you can get those at my website, jasonalysis.com, in the shop, and you can find me over on Rockfin as well.
And thank you so much for having me.
Of course, Jay. A pleasure, as always.
Always loving having you. We'll talk to you soon, and go watch NOPE again.
I am going to watch it again, yeah, because I like that idea.
Go watch the Marty's home trailer, too, man. There's so much in there about NASA. And remember, that perception of what aliens are and even what Jupiter thinks it's going to be, you know, there's a lot more there when you watch it the second time through.
Jay Dyer, everybody, thank you so much.
All right, folks. Now what we're going to do is we're going to get into the muskernuts.
We're going to do the show-and-tell watch-along for the remainder of the broadcast.
And again, this is to train you.
What do I mean to train you?
To train you to believe, oh, it's show-and-tell time.
This is great. Remember what you used to bring things that were good into show-and-tell?
Your favorite toy or your hobby.
Ooh and ah.
And he's just like you, Elon Musk.
That's what he is.
Just like you.
So let's let's get to the muskernuts right now
I I
COMMENT FROM THE YOUTUBERS What's up YouTube? It's your boy Michael! We've got a crazy
factory, don't we? Yeah!
Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, look it's an apple! You're a sheep or a pig or a monkey!
Peace.
Yeah!
Neuralink.
Here comes our Lord and Savior, Elon Muskernutz.
Woo! Elon!
Yeah! Look at that t-shirt fit!
You got a girdle under there, my friend?
Is it girdle town?
Tell us about it, Elon. Welcome to the Neuralink show and tell.
So we've got an amazing amount of new developments to share with you that I think are incredibly exciting as well as tell you about the future of what we're planning to do here.
Now this is meant to be a technical podcast.
I'm going to provide an overall summary and then we're going to have a number of members of the Neuralink team come in and give a deep technical overview of the various areas.
I love how now everything is a podcast.
And it's true, man.
I've been doing this kind of stuff now for years.
Even before I was with Jones and while I was doing documentary films with the Loose Change guys, we did Louder Than Words radio.
It was internet broadcasting.
We did it over a phone.
You'd probably call that podcasting at this point.
So now a video presentation with a multitude of engineers inside the company giving that presentation is looked at in the podcast model.
Just want to point that out.
So, yeah, so let me move forward with the overall summary.
Now, some of the things I'm going to say are things you've, well, if you've been following Neuralink, you've already heard before, but for a lot of people out there, they've no idea what Neuralink does, and so I'll be a little bit repetitive of things you may already know, but others do not.
The overarching goal of Neuralink is to create ultimately a whole-brain interface.
Yay! A whole-brain interface.
And when we were talking with Jay Dyer earlier, he talked about some of the technologies that had been rejected.
And one of those would be Google Glass, which was not VR, it was AR, augmented reality with an overlay.
Now, can you imagine that overlay via...
Your sensory system in real time without a third-party device being wearable because it was implanted.
That's the type of thing he's discussing right now.
So a generalized input-output device that in the long term literally could interface with every aspect of your brain.
And in the short term, it can interface with any given section of your brain and solve a tremendous number of things that cause debilitating issues for people.
So our long term is...
I'll talk a little bit about a long-term goal.
It's going to sound a little esoteric, but it was actually my prime motivation, which was What do we do about AI? So here he's telling you, my prime motivation is that AI is going to overtake humanity no matter what.
So the only way that we can compete is by what?
Sacrificing our humanity on the altar of transhumanism and trying to upgrade ourselves to the level of artificial intelligence or beyond.
Like, what do we do about artificial general intelligence?
If we have digital superintelligence that's, you know, just much smarter than any human, how do we mitigate that risk?
At a species level, how do we mitigate that risk?
And then even in a benign scenario where The AI is very, very benevolent.
And you notice that term benign is used.
We used it with Jay Dyer and the lockstep document.
Oh, it's benign.
And in a sense, you know, all technology, quote unquote, is benign in the sense that you can use it to empower or enslave a hammer, build a house with it, bash a head in.
You can do one or the other.
You can do both. Probably do both same timeline.
I mean, you literally be nailing away and the guy next to you comes at you with a knife and whappity-do.
Just same brushstroke, if you will.
Then how do we even go along for the ride?
How do we participate?
And the conclusion, the biggest limitation in going along for the ride and in aligning AI, I think, is the bandwidth, how quickly you can interact with the computer.
So we are all already cyborgs, in a way, in that your phone Total lie.
He's made this argument since really popularizing it on Joe Rogan that this is somehow making me a cyborg.
No. No.
It certainly allows me to extend my intelligence into the digital realm the same way a PC did or a laptop did.
Or even, if we want to go back to old school analog, the way when I went to the library and I went to the Dewey Decimal System and I went to a book to retrieve information.
Or in the aspect of what being able to communicate via a phone.
Or, back in the day, it used to be the mail system, very, very analog, very, very movable, and text messages.
None of this has made me a cyborg because I haven't accepted it into my biology.
It's a misnomer.
And your computer are extensions of yourself.
And if you, I'm sure you found, like, if you leave your phone behind, you end up tapping your pockets and it's like having missing limb syndrome.
No, it's not. The phone is, it is, leaving your phone behind is kind of like a missing limb at this point.
You're so used to interfacing with it.
You're so used to being a de facto cyborg.
So what's the limitation on a phone or a laptop?
Limitation is the rate at which you can receive and send information, especially the speed with which you can send information.
So if you're interacting with a phone, it's limited by the speed at which you can move your thumbs or the speed at which you can talk into your phone.
This is an extremely low data rate.
So I want people to understand this.
In one sense, he's right that it's an extremely low data rate.
In other words, back in the day, when computers were glorified word processors, you were talking about kilobytes of information to produce novels, books, articles, extensive amounts of text, and people were like, whoa, whoa.
Then it got a little better, right?
With those kilobytes, you got crude graphics.
When you get to the megabytes realm, now we can talk about photography and layouts and even image manipulation.
Okay? So that's the extension of it.
When we're talking about audio files, right?
You talk about WAV files or FLAC files or now MP3s or compression and even more compressed files, other things like MIDI, etc.
They are all low data rates.
Okay? But to compare what I use to communicate with other human beings, send data to you, and you receive that data here, and then you process that information as somehow a low data rate.
Is really, in my opinion, impeding on the human process.
Trying to point to that being inferior.
And that you want to assimilate to the Borg, to the machine, because things are going to be quicker and more efficient and better.
No thank you, Mr.
Musk. No thank you.
You know, maybe it's like 10, optimistically 100 bits per second, but a computer can communicate at, you know, gigabits, terabits per second.
So this is the fundamental limitation that I think we need to address to mitigate the long-term risk of artificial intelligence and also just go along for the ride.
And, yeah. And just, yeah, go along for the ride.
I mean, Elon isn't even really articulate.
It boggles my mind, you know, how they've gotten away with propping these people up.
And this guy's supposed to be the new savior trying to create a generalized operating system, in-out interface platform for your brain.
But like I said, that's an esoteric explanation that I think will appeal to a niche audience.
Some of whom may be here.
And that's a very difficult problem.
So even if we do not succeed with that problem, I think we are confident at this point that we will succeed at solving many brain injury issues, spine injury issues along the way.
So... Yeah, so...
See, right away, everybody, ha, ha, ha, Rick and Morty, funny.
Hi, Justin. So it's a little Rick and Morty reference here.
There's a great Rick and Morty episode about intelligence enhancement of your dog, and what's the worst that could happen?
And by the way, things don't go great, but it's hilarious.
Again, this is the pop culture sell.
Show and tell. He's the good billionaire.
He likes the Rick and Morty cartoon.
People like the Rick and Morty cartoon.
Justin Rowland, who's the co-creator of Rick and Morty with Dan Harmon, he's in the audience.
Yeah, Rick and Morty!
Woo! Elon Tusk!
So... Anyway, Rick and Morty.
I recommend it. So you want to be able to read the signals from the brain.
You want to be able to write the signals.
You want to be able to ultimately do that for the entire brain.
And then also extend that to communicating to the rest of your nervous system if you have a sort of a severed spinal cord or neck.
And like I said, much later in the presentation, presentations two hours, they show you where these pigs not only have the human brain interface, but another human brain interface that is attached via their spinal cord when they're talking about paralysis and interwoven into their nervous system.
This video is now 18 months old.
So this is Pager who is playing monkey mind pong.
Pager has a Neuralink implant in this video.
And the thing that's interesting is that you can't even see the neural implant.
So we've miniaturized the neural implant to the point where it matches the thickness of the skull that is removed.
So essentially it's sort of like having an Apple Watch or a Fitbit Replacing a piece of skull with a smartwatch, for lack of a better analogy.
Because that's what I want to do. Please cut out a piece of my skull and then put a smartwatch apparatus where that piece of skull used to be.
But don't stop there.
Let a robot kiosk...
We've intricate, basically, microfibers into my brain as well.
Awesome. Fantastic.
Thank you, Elon. I can play Pong.
So... So you can see, he looks pretty...
He's normal. And I think that's pretty important.
If you have a Neuralink device...
Like, I could have a Neuralink device implanted right now, and you wouldn't...
You wouldn't even know.
I mean, hypothetically, maybe one of these demos, in fact, one of these demos I will.
One of these demos I will.
I'll have the pronunciation. I'm taking it.
I mean, again. First of all, it's kind of wild.
Hey, monkeys can play Pong.
They can actually play Pong if you give them a joystick.
So Pedro first learned to play Pong with a joystick.
So I'm like, that was novel.
It's like I didn't know monkeys could play Pong, but they can.
So we first trained Pager to play Pong with a joystick, then we took the joystick away and have the neural link, and now he's playing telepathic video games, essentially.
Telepathic video games. Yeah.
No, you only have to go back to the 1970s to be able to play Pong with your mind now.
That's great. How far we've come in 40 years.
You know, I'm going to skip around here a little bit just to kind of give you an idea of the whole thing as we kind of wrap up the show.
But Musk is up there for quite some time.
This is the person that talks about the Matrix that I referenced earlier and how the Kung Fu.
They get into the aspect of the robot kiosk right here that's going to be weaving these threads into your brain.
Then they show you on the dummy.
How it's actually done in a dual camera view.
They talk about how they're going to be building their own facilities to do this.
They talk about the functionality of the neural decoding.
Those waves right there are actually real brain patterns.
I did think it was interesting that they were talking about the difficulty of the predictability of these patterns and how they would change...
Even via certain biological individuals.
So to me, I still think they have a really long way to go.
When they're showing you these vector-based movements, that is them trying to replicate the brain waves to make those movements by the chimpanzees.
You can see right here, How big the device is.
And the thing is, this thing is going to have to be charged, too.
You're literally seeing this high charge rate.
Like, not only are you going to have to have the device, you're going to have to put a device on your head to charge this thing.
No thanks. No thanks.
When we're talking about this, and they're showing you this actually being implanted into a skull, this woman in particular, and the layers of the skull and the membranes around the brain, she gives a pretty heartfelt...
This presentation, this young woman that I'm blocking, because, you know, she talks about her father having ALS, right?
And she likens this thing to the beginning of LASIK surgery.
And LASIK is an amazing surgery.
Hey, I'm here to empower humanity.
Like I said, I like empowerment.
All right, but to say this is the same kind of thing?
Nope. Nope.
Not even close.
Not even close. You know, first of all, when they start getting into the Q&A, they admit these things have a lifespan.
Alright? It has planned obsolescence built in.
Like, can you imagine rolling around with a brain chip in your skull that's just like 20 years out of date and never got updated?
And you never got it taken out?
Is that a good thing? It's a good thing to get it in the first place.
Do you really want something that you're going to have to charge, permanently attached not only to your body, but your brain?
We talk about the internet of bodies and originally Jay Dyer was discussing different measures where you take the nano blood or whatever and it can measure your heart rates and your cholesterol levels, endorphin levels, etc. Those are some of the types of things that they can monitor via these human brain interfaces.
Guys, I think we're going to wrap it up about 10 minutes early.
Before we do, I do want to remind everybody, and I want to thank everybody who came over to the premium end of the broadcast.
I didn't realize we had a caller earlier on Podbean, or we would have probably taken that as well.
My documentary films are Loose Change, Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, A New World Order to Find and Shade the Motion Picture.
You can find them free across a multitude of platforms, including Red Voice Media.
I want to point out, despite all the censorship out there, 70,000 plus...
We've actually now passed that with a third-party platform that isn't that popular out there.
Most people know what Rumble is, and we want to gain Rumble subscribers as well.
But we're over 70,000 plus over on Rockfin as well.
You can find me on The Rumble.
Remember, if you're just listening to this thing, it's a dollar for the first week, right?
How can you beat that? A dollar for the first week to try out the premium?
We do it four days, four days, four days a week live, 8 a.m.
▲
Export Selection