All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 1, 2022 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
56:47
Musk's Brain Chip Show And Tell With Jay Dyer - Reality Rants With Jason Bermas
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We have developed speed but we have shut ourselves in.
Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
We think too much and feel too little.
More than machinery, we need humanity.
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
We know things are bad, worse than bad.
They're crazy. Silence!
The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
You gotta say, I'm a human being!
Goddammit! My life has value!
You have meddled with the primal forces of nature!
Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men.
Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
Yeah, thank you.
You're beautiful.
I love you.
Yes.
You're beautiful.
Thank you.
It's showtime.
And now, Reality Rant with Jason Vermez.
And who loves you?
And who do you love?
Hey everybody! Jason Bermas here.
It is Reality Rants.
We are at redvoicemedia.com, especially for that second hour, that you're definitely going to want to see today because we're going to be spending it with Jay Dyer.
He's going to join us about 30 minutes into the broadcast.
And, you know, there are probably some people out there that say, hey Jason, oh man, and of course I'm not out on Rumble.
I'm not out on my Rumble, so we're going to have to do that live.
I love it when I have to do something live.
It's because I didn't put the key code in right.
It's my own fault, folks.
If you're on the other platforms, thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
To get back to what I was saying, a lot of people may get upset that I'm harping on the musk.
Right? That Musk is a huge part of this broadcast now.
He didn't used to be.
Somewhere in the backdrop.
Discussed every once in a while.
Certainly not in any kind of benevolent fashion.
I think in any reality fashion.
Especially with the terms that he was pushing.
A lot of things even beyond transhumanism, right?
For instance...
There's the alien angle that Elon Musk pushes.
If you haven't followed Jason Burmess, he's going to tell you that the vast majority of what you think you know about aliens and extraterrestrials and ancient astronauts and whatever you've seen on the History Channel...
And now, all these other networks that used to teach you about the Civil War, the Revolutionary War, World War II, historical context of colonization globally, you know, those type of things in their infancy, way back in the day when they were launched, late 90s, early 2000s, and then they expanded to nonsense.
And now there's a huge amount of money behind, you know, really Hollywoodizing the vast majority of this stuff.
And what do I mean by Hollywoodizing?
Getting you to think in a certain way.
It's been going on for a very, very long time when it comes to whatever UFOs are.
And the vast majority of that stuff is black programs and man-made technology, if not 100%.
Very possible, 100%.
Aliens is a great cover story.
A lot of people don't want to hear that.
Why? We've been totally and completely indoctrinated.
So, Musk has pushed that.
Musk has pushed that we live in a simulation, that we're not in base reality.
Time and time and time again, it talks about ways to manipulate the simulation.
That's what we should be doing via science.
I don't think we're in a simulation.
I know that that's also kind of like a popular thing with David Icke.
That's something I would take contention with him on.
Just because, you know, Ike talks about the quote-unquote holographic universe.
Just because physics indeed does work that way and quantum mechanics does work that way does not mean that we are essentially some kind of written computer program.
I mean, I guess that could be...
An analogy, in my opinion, for whatever intelligent designer or process is out there.
That's about as far as I'll go on, you know, the nature of God and all that other good stuff.
That's not why I'm here.
I'm here to warn you that Elon Musk is not good for humanity.
And I can't turn a corner.
I get off the air yesterday and I see Musk tweeting...
That Neuralink information incoming.
And that was going to be at 6pm Pacific Time.
Now I'm Central.
I tuned right in at 8 o'clock.
I had to wait like 40 minutes.
We're going to play...
For some reason the video is unlisted now.
I watched the whole thing, by the way.
We're probably only going to get to watch along with the beginning with Elon.
But certainly there are parts that play on your heartstrings too.
The technology is totally a double-edged sword where they're focusing on curing paralysis and blindness in human beings.
Something I'm obviously for.
I'd love to see that.
But the vast majority...
It was literally taking you inside the brain and the process of taking these threads and essentially implanting them into your brain and the process by which they'll do that via a surgical robot.
That's the vast majority of the program.
Okay? Let's see.
We got Jay Dyer.
He might be just coming in early.
That's good. Well, we'll take him early.
As soon as he signs in, we'll jump him in.
So maybe we'll do the watch-along on the second half of the broadcast.
If Dyer joins us.
And we'll discuss this.
Because I also did his show.
And a lot of this was, in fact...
Transhumanist.
I don't know. The future.
The post-human world.
Where... We, as human beings, no longer have to be carbon-based entities because we're not human beings anymore.
And when I say we, I'm talking you and I. I'm not talking the people at the tippity-top.
By then, automation will be serving them in such a manner that they hope to have created a secondary surf class that believes it can upload into some kind of virtual universe.
Again, stuff pushed by muskernuts.
Okay? Now, in the mainstream media, by the way, what are they focusing on?
Oh, he's going to be taken down from the App Store.
Twitter's going from the App Store.
Then all of a sudden I see him prancing around with Tim Cook.
He's prancing around with Tim Cook over at the Apple Place.
Let's see, and there he is. He's here.
So Jay Dyer is about to join us, everybody.
Let me just get the kinks out over here.
I appreciate you coming in early, my man.
We did have you at 8.30, but it's great to have you right now, especially with the Musker Nuts.
I don't know if you saw it yesterday, but because they talk to us like children and they want you to associate Elon Musk with a classmate or a peer, yesterday's presentation, Jay, was show and tell.
Welcome to show and tell.
It's no big deal. Those are actual brain patterns.
It was the next phase of Neuralink and where they've come.
Obviously, it was very curated.
But it's not only pushing the idea that we're going to have these human brain interfaces, but that they are going to be very easily upgradable.
So that if you get the first generation, you can still get the 14th generation and not have to worry about it too much.
It's becoming more and more apparent that there's actually going to be planned obsolescence built into these brain chips, which is frightening in of itself.
And, of course, they play up the angle of being able to make the blind see again and the paralyzed walk, and they were showing the integration of not only the human brain interface, but now pigs that had two of these devices, one that was actually intertwined with their spinal cord and nerve system there in order to make their hind legs move.
So, Jay Dyer, Jay's analysis, thanks for joining me in this long-winded Intro.
Did you see the Musker Nuts?
Yes, I did.
It reminded me of the...
The book that I read not too long ago from John C. Lilly, the crazy dolphin guy who, I mean, he had a sexual thing for dolphins and he's one of the MKUltra doctors who was one of the pioneers of putting these into animals.
And so all of this comes out of MKUltra research.
It comes out of mind control.
And he pioneered this Originally with monkeys, he started with putting them into monkeys back in the 50s and 60s.
And this was all with a bunch of naval money.
Navy gave him all kinds of money to figure out the best way to mind control.
And so from the 1950s to 60s to now, we have upgraded this to where you can now look up to the internet.
And to me, it's just baffling that anybody would want to do this.
I can't fathom.
At all championing this or cheering this on, I think it's crazy.
Because it's literally out of mind control.
It's directly out of the MKUltra project.
And yet, watching it, I mean, when we talk about literal and crazy, when we get to the second hour, and by the way, we are on YouTube, Dyer!
So you know the rules! You know the rules here on YouTube.
Talk about mind control.
There are just certain things that we're not allowed to discuss.
Even with Elon Musk, I'll only go so far as to let everybody know that the Tesla robot that is going to be doing the brain surgery is just one of the many robots created by Tesla that have nothing to do with carbon emissions in your car.
There are things like CureVac that are scaling up mRNA technology.
Just putting that out there, folks.
So in this, people are literally laughing, Jay.
I mean, first of all, he's getting rounds of applause all over the place.
And one of the things that I want to put out there with this great narrative push is that there are certain things you're allowed to criticize Elon Musk on right now.
And obviously it's free speech, and he's giving Nazis platforms, and he's endangering us all.
But despite the fact...
We have a number of mainstream articles about the leaks of the photos of the brain-hacked monkeys and how many that they lost.
This was put out in Daily Mail just two days ago.
People were sending me this stuff a couple weeks ago when it indeed did leak.
I watched the whole thing. And they presented it as though the monkeys themselves, Jay, were doing fine.
They only showed you the healthy ones.
There was no discussion of any that had died.
And they talked about the long-term research on these devices being over a two-year period.
So, you know, let's discuss that first of all.
None of this experimentation is really new.
It's new to the public. It's already been done in the background in many cases, and now it's being commercialized, and how can we mass-produce it?
I would liken it to this.
When I did a breakdown of the Transformers conference, there was a section there with NASA and a representative from Rocketdyne, and they were talking about Some of the propulsion technologies and some of the nanoset technologies that they had had for decades.
But they weren't able to scale them up until cell phones became a thing.
And they were mass-producing microprocessors in which they were using those microprocessors in mass for these nanosatellites.
And that made it commercially viable.
So, you know, talk about how this is...
Again, going on for decades and how they scale this up through this techno-fascist military-industrial complex partnership with things like Samsung and Lockheed Martin.
It shows that what we're talking about is not something that is out of nowhere, right?
I mean, the idea that you could have all of these corporations, you could have this unified front when it comes from both DARPA or government entities tied into these Fortune 100.
I mean, this shows that this is not something that, you know, That they didn't just come up with this in the last few years, right?
This is something that goes back to a long-term relationship that the Pentagon has had with private corporations.
We were warned about this a long time ago, but we were also told 100 years ago that this would be the case by the elites themselves.
They talked about the need to bring in a techno-fascist government, as you said, in many of their writings, many of their white papers.
They even talked about how to sell it to the public as something that would be a good thing.
Sorry, I'm a little bit sick.
Hey man, I am too.
I'm pretty hoarse. This is like the hoarse broadcast.
It's going around. You know what?
I don't even want to say what I want to say because we're on YouTube.
I'm going to save the joke.
It's alright to be a little coffee and hoarse.
I've been hitting that cough button myself.
Burmese Brigade, you've been putting up with it.
We appreciate it. Last day, by the way.
In the four-day-a-week show that we're doing, 8 a.m.
to 10 a.m. Eastern, we really do appreciate you joining us super early for this, but we're probably the first ones to break this down critically.
This happened last night for the most part.
He came on about an hour late.
It was almost a three-hour presentation, which surprised me.
But large-scale, What they were really concentrating on was, again, the robotics and the idea of how they're going to thread these microfibers into parts of the brain where there's literally no inflammation.
And when Musk talked about it later on after they'd given their presentation, right now they're talking about Essentially, a six-hour process with a Mengele-style doctor, neurosurgeon, overseeing many of these robotic surgeries at once and only stepping in in the final stages to make sure everything goes okay as they basically wrap it up and oversee the process.
So that's a six-hour process.
He wants to cut this down to 20 minutes.
Now, this is the same guy that's promising us an optimist robot last month, which is going to be humanoid, obviously autonomous, and have a quote-unquote brain functionality via AI that we haven't seen before.
Now, you and I both know that there is a place for automation, but you wouldn't build something that's exactly like a human being unless you were getting human beings ready to be replaced by this thing.
Because, obviously, the human body can be approved upon, especially when they're doing manual types of labor, and that's what you would think a robot like this would be.
Wasn't there... Didn't he say something about he wanted these at kiosks in the mall or something like that?
Yeah, and he wants them at a $20,000 price point.
Who knows what that'll be when these things are commercially available in 5 to 10 years and they are scalable.
But basically this is acclimating the populace to not only be comfortable but approve of brain chips from the freedom of speech guy and approve of robots from the freedom of speech guy.
And all of this technology...
Has already been, I would say, pioneered behind the scenes in this DARPA military-industrial complex environment and now is being passed along to a man who literally has the highest contracts with them via the Defense Department, Jay. Oh, we're muted.
Yeah, exactly.
Bill Joy wrote this essay back in 2001, right, Why the Future Doesn't Need Us.
And he goes on in about the first three pages to talk about how he got together with Ray Kurzweil and the other tech elite at the time and said that...
They had made this decision that they would either give us this sort of happy-go-lucky, feel-good version of a dystopia where they just drug us, or they might try to depop everybody, right?
So he said that after a long discussion with everybody, the tech elite had decided in Silicon Valley that the best route was to get rid of everybody.
And the way that they would do that would be to eventually replace everybody with AI, with the very thing that you're talking about.
So this was written again right around the time of 9-11 by, you know, the guy who ran Sun Microsystems.
So we know that this was the plan between the corporate elite, between the Pentagon, the government elite, a long time ago.
And so that this is rolling out now shouldn't surprise anybody if you've been reading this literature.
But the same tech elite have been warning and saying that we're going to do this.
Bill Joy is the only one I know of that wrote a big essay saying that we're just going to They were all talking about getting rid of everybody and I was nervous about it and I said, we don't need to do this.
And you know what? That article, first of all, it's lengthy.
And I encourage people, of course, to read it start to finish and don't cherry pick your information in it because
Where it really comes from is he's at this conference and then it's later at the bar that he meets Kurzweil
Right and you know Kurzweil is now I need people to understand this
Especially if you haven't gone to a lot of conferences and by this point, I'm middle-aged
I've actually spoken a lot of conferences I've covered a lot of conferences a lot of the juicy stuff
goes on behind closed doors in private meetings or over lunch or dinner
dinner or even after the fact.
Some of the best conversations I've had at these things is after the fact.
So put yourself in this scenario.
You're at a large tech conference.
You're a tech CEO. You're at, right now, the precipice of information technology because this is right at that turn of the century.
This is when the internet is going into most households.
Personal computers are being a thing outside of schools and jobs.
And now you're hearing these people on stage talking about AI and what I have down here, not only a transhumanist future, but a possible post-human future.
And they're openly discussing it.
So he admits in the very beginning that he'd never really given it much thought that that was a possibility, that there was going to be a limit to Moore's Law, and that eventually it would cap off.
So he has this conversation with Kurzweil, and then they get the probabilities of whether or not AI will actually end up being malevolent and take over.
And what's really interesting from there is that Joy pulls out a quote That indeed, you know, it talks about the enslavement of man via technology, and it makes a lot of sense.
And then you realize that it's from the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski.
Somebody who himself had succumbed to some of these mind control experiments, ironically, during that time period.
We actually know that. Through universities, by the way.
Showing, again, that public-private partnership they want so much in the World Economic Forum, that MKUltra model.
So, as it goes along, it basically...
Points out that they're going to, you know, create wealth within a system with these things.
It will not be able to be stopped.
And yes, they've decided that they're going to take hold of what the next stages of really the evolution of every species on the planet is.
By the way, almost 200 watching on YouTube.
Can we get 100 thumbs up, please?
Let's get this one out there.
Dire thoughts. Yeah, so it goes on to talk about nanotech, right?
So it doesn't just stop there.
That's the most important section, I think, is the first few pages.
But he goes on to talk about nanotechnology and black goo.
At that time, it was called gray goo, but it eventually becomes called black goo.
But you've probably seen this in a lot of science fiction movies, right?
If you watch X-Files, the black goo is connected with the aliens or whatever.
This is the real people who make the black goo talking about the nanotech and what it might do.
And he says that eventually it will take over and change human genetics.
He goes on to say that he had watched a lot of sci-fi growing up and he was surprised himself that over time he's eventually living in the world of Star Trek and the science fiction stuff that he had grown up with.
And then oddly enough he goes back to the time of World War II. I started talking about Edward Teller, who I'm sure everybody's familiar with in terms of Manhattan Project, but also the GO engineering types of programs.
And black projects, propulsion systems, very much involved in the type of black sites like Area 51 and probably beyond.
Unfortunately, a lot of that stuff is majorly classified, but continue.
And he talks about Oppenheimer.
He talks about Los Alamos.
He talks about these things that were, like you said, stuff that comes up in, for example, Annie Jacobson's books on DARPA and Area 51.
So here you have one of the top Silicon Valley guys talking about this.
Oddly enough, he goes to talking about the United Nations and their way of policing the world.
As a result of the Manhattan Project and how this creates a kind of world order.
He says he summoned their policing in the world in terms of nukes in UKE, right?
Nuke technology. And he says that that has actually led to a world order as well as the Cold War.
And then he mentions the Star Wars Defense Initiative and how Arthur C. Clarke in science fiction played a huge role in this.
Of course, Arthur C. Clarke was himself a Crowleyan member of the...
I don't know if he's in the OTO, but he was in the circles of Crowley.
And so what you get in Clarke's novels is a version of...
An occult, transhumanist future.
And although he doesn't mention Crowley, he's saying that that's what Arthur C. Clarke's writing about when he writes about the Star Wars event, or when he talks about the future that it could be.
And that out of the Cold War, what we would get was this technocratic order.
And Bill Joy is saying that that's the technocratic order that we're in now.
And he says that the god of this order is scientism.
Right? That's a critique that I make all the time.
Science is viewed as God.
Um, and then he goes on to talk about how, uh, we've got to find some kind of ethic or else we're all going to be in a, um, in the matrix, basically is where he says, and we will be gotten rid of.
He says, if we don't come up with an ethic, and by the way, he cites as one of these, so I don't put much hope in his ethics or ethics philosophers that he mentions.
Like he mentions, um, The Dalai Lama and Jacques Attali.
But I'm pretty sure the Dalai Lama is part and parcel with all this.
And Jacques Attali is the Kissinger of France.
You know, he's the author of Brief History of the Future, which is a book about transhumanism.
Well, you know, you just mentioned the Matrix, and obviously it's something that is referred to again and again and again.
We talk about this virtual arena.
But I want to point out, it was literally referenced by one of the engineers talking about how when he was a kid watching the Matrix and watching the scene where Neo was able to learn Kung Fu via an upload, he said, that's what I want to be a part of.
That's what I want to be doing.
So, in a lot of ways Hollyweird and the perceptions we get from that shape the future.
We're seeing it in real time.
And at the same time, I often talk about this Musk persona.
And the persona has been pushed via pop culture.
He's literally done guest spots on one of the most popular and smartest cartoons out there, Rick and Morty.
That was interwoven into the presentation, into the very beginning last night, where they put up a diagram of Rick and And Justin Rowland, the co-creator, was actually in the audience.
And yet, you mentioned the Star Wars program.
And it's been around since 83.
This is really the first generation of the weaponization of space.
And at least letting the public know it was being done on a mass level.
What really still is not discussed...
Starlink is really the commercialization of that weapons system.
There's a partnership with DARPA and the Blackjack program to launch the very same things with SpaceX, which is working with NASA, which is also part of the Defense Department.
And Musk is essentially the front for this as well.
That's also not a criticism you see anywhere in the mainstream media.
So, you know, speak to that fact.
You talked about Arthur C. Clarke.
And, you know, talk about imagery, right?
I just had a picture of the wonderful...
Neuralink robot up.
Let's bring it up again. And tell me that it doesn't look like something out of 2001.
A space odyssey.
It comes right out of a Kubrick-esque design.
Talk about that shaping and then the reality of space warfare.
As you know, Kubrick worked with NASA, right?
Kubrick worked with NASA and they gave him access to certain lenses and certain technology.
If he would make that deal and would, in some ways, help them to do whatever and let them consult on 2001 and this kind of stuff.
So there's always been this marriage between Hollywood and the deep state, but particularly in regard to science fiction.
They're all about wedding themselves to certain projects, blockbusters especially, for propaganda purposes.
So in my first two books, what I did was I covered that aspect, that relationship between Hollywood and the Pentagon.
And the reason they love sci-fi is that that's one of the most potent ways to plan the future, because science fiction is a little more relevant than something like fantasy movies, right?
I mean, they'll still put the same types of messages in all kinds of films, but blockbusters and science fiction blockbusters in particular, especially Marvel or the Bond movies, right, these oftentimes have things like Smart Blood, James Bond in the original Casino Royale, not original in the sense of the old one, but the Daniel Craig Casino Royale.
He ends up getting injected with Smart Blood eventually.
It starts out in the Casino Royale, I should say, as a microchip.
Then by the time of Spectre, he gets injected with NanoBlood.
Now, nanoblood is something that Ray Kurzweil talked about in his Singularity book, which then came out in 2005 or 2006.
And he said that eventually we'll have this technology by which the nanos that will be integrated into the human biology and will be able to change the human biology.
And Hollywood films have been saying that for a long time, but now it's being put into, you know, Like the biggest franchise in history, the Bond franchise, or the second biggest now.
I think Harry Potter is bigger than that.
And that's training. That's getting you ready for you to accept this, right?
And they're going to sell it to you like, oh, you know, don't you...
If you're a boomer and you've got heart problems, if we give you smart blood, right?
We'll be able to monitor your heart and we'll be able to track it and all this kind of stuff.
And it's not. It's to do, as Klaus says, to change human biology, to make biological life forms into synthetic, silicon-based life forms, right?
So this is a long process by which they're going to change people.
And the way that they prepare everybody for this is through these movies.
And they've been doing that for a long time.
You can go all the way back to, you and I were talking the other day on my podcast about The CIA was consulting on the movie The Day the Earth Stood Still.
And they were consulting on that because they found that to be a really powerful vehicle for the promotion of socialist world government.
Why would the CIA want to promote socialist world government?
Well, because the CIA was never really about ending socialism or is never really about fighting the Cold War.
It was always about this long-term goal of bringing in the very thing that you're talking about.
Which is projects developed at DARPA that eventually become a corporate global project, as we see in your examples.
And, you know, we discussed also how basically the military-industrial complex through the War of the Worlds was able to figure out that you could have large-scale exploitation via psychological warfare and entertainment.
And that's when, you know, the investments...
There's always been a relationship with entertainment and warfare, right?
Yeah. But I would say that the birth of Hollywood, and especially that post-World War II era, right?
They'd already gotten Bob Hope and the Maryland and Rose, and there's a lot of interesting stuff with the OSS.
But full throttle, that began to be their vehicle for kind of social engineering
and shaping of the viewpoints of the American populace.
At the same time, running these type of genetic experiments, not just propulsion systems,
not just weapon systems, behind the scenes.
And now what we're getting is also the normalization of say these chimeras that are being worked on via
universities.
Talk about that aspect of it.
Yeah, so...
Lost you, Jay.
Lost you again. Nope, you're still dead.
I don't know. No, there's a short in the mic cord.
There you go. So sometimes it defaults back to the Mac.
Anyway, genetic modification is a huge part of this because what they wanted to do when they discovered the code that makes us human beings, they wanted to figure out immediately how to alter that code.
And by altering it, you would have people, you have individuals that are no longer human, obviously, right?
So the ability to control that coding and to switch off and on various switches, you could say, within that coding allows the coder to program the human being, essentially.
So they have a view where human beings are viewed like computer code.
And I mentioned John C. Lilly earlier, but he has another book called Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer.
And as one of them culture doctors, that's a really important book because he's talking about how we can program the mind like a computer code and the human body itself through the DNA can be programmed.
And so, these tech nerds literally see all of reality in this code way.
And so, it's not just a matter of changing human DNA. They actually, if you read Klaus' book, Fourth of Nose Revolution, by the end of the book, he talks about how all coding that exists in the world, even if it's animal DNA, he says all of this will be evolved and changed into something else.
And so, they want to take it out of the broken world Fallen state that it's in.
And as part of their great work, they believe that they can perfect not just man, but all of nature.
That is the alchemical dictum.
And one of the global elite who goes into a lot of detail about this genetic modification is Arthur Kessler.
In his book, Ghost in the Machine, and he literally ends the whole book after talking about how everybody will be drugged and processed through this system and their DNA changed.
To be something else.
He calls it a mutation. He says that the best explanation for what we are doing is, quote, alchemy.
So he was a famous Marxist who became a member of the Royal Society.
He was a decorated elitist from the, you know, British imperial model.
So-called Marxist who's, like, allied with the so-called anti-Marxist, right, British intelligence.
Given all these awards and accolades, writes all these books and people overlook this Ghost in the Machine book.
But that's the book where he actually says that they're going to mutate everybody.
And it's a dark alchemy.
So that's pretty wild because people think, oh, science isn't alchemy.
No, it is. It's wild, but it's true because when you're talking about biomimetics and you're talking about taking carbon-based life and then having a post-carbon-based entity replace that life in the vast majority, well, tricking people Into essentially uploading their consciousness when it's not uploading their consciousness.
It's a cheap imitation, even via biomimetics.
I'd say it's more than mutating.
I again think that the people at the top think that they're going to genetically modify themselves
to stay in their biological bodies while they create a surf class that is enslaved with
this technology and then really just tricked into euthanasia.
We see the promotion for that.
You talk about, I know I played some Bushnell clips for you in the past, but have I ever
played the one where at the end of the day he says the best we can hope for is we become
them, they become us, or we have human contaminated machines?
No.
Let's, I'm...
First, I'm going to play this for the audience.
Let's bring this one up. And we're probably going to end up blocking out Jay's face for a second, bringing it on over there.
Here is where Dennis Bushnell, the chief scientist of NASA and the author of the document I often go to, actually states what Jay says.
He literally says after he talks about 200,000 human beings already with brain chips.
Okay, in 2018, guys, we're talking muskernuts.
This is why we keep playing this clip.
But he tells you that the evolution of everything Everything is over.
And that we have taken it over.
So let's play the clip here.
Here is Dennis Bushnell.
Humans are now becoming cyborgs.
We have cochlear implants to hear, artificial retinas to see, artificial hearts to live, artificial limbs to move, artificial organs to function, and brain chips.
There's a couple hundred thousand people wandering around with brain chips now.
It affects congenitally defective brains, and increasingly it affects memory and other things.
DARPA's working on brain chips for super soldiers.
And people are now working, thanks to Musk and other people, funding on direct machine brain communications.
It's not us versus them, us versus the machines.
We're merging. And this is the human evolution of the humans.
There is no more natural evolution of anything.
Stop it right there. There is no more natural evolution of anything.
They're telling you right there, taking control of the whole shebango.
And now I'm going to skip over to this clip here, where at the end of it, he says, where does this all go?
What do we do with all these people?
...ships for super soldiers.
We can have a high bandwidth com port built in so we don't have to use the sensors and they're very limited bandwidth.
And eventually this all ends up with uploading into the machines and instead of us versus them, humans versus the machines, we become Human-contaminated machines?
That's the chief scientist at NASA over decades.
He works with the Defense Department.
He works with the intelligence apparatus.
He's very much in the know of real technology.
He's headed up the Jason Groups before, and there it is out of the horse's mouth.
That's not me saying it.
That's a guy that's privy to actually what's going on behind the scenes.
What are your thoughts, Jay?
I mean, that echoes the ghost in the machine very well right there.
Yeah, I mean, this is, so if you read the, you know, there's two books that complement each other really well on this.
One is Alex Obea's book on the Rand Corporation, which you and I have done podcasts in the past about.
And there's also another complement to that, which is, Andy Jacobson's book on the history of DARPA. You'll notice the overlap between these two entities, DARPA and RAND, and both of them have dealt with this very future that you're talking about in terms of planning it out and providing the R&D, providing the The scientists, the brain trust to do this.
This is a lot of the adjacent society individuals that you're talking about.
And this goes back to Cold War era, people like Jean-Marc Neumann, a lot of these mathematicians.
It goes back to Norbert Wiener and the idea of cybernetics.
And the weird part is that originally it's, you know, if you go back to the Cold War period, it's we're going to evolve man to be the Superman, the Ubermensch of Nietzsche, quite literally.
And then it turns into, oh, actually, man's the problem.
We're going to take select ones and move them into this android-cyborg reality.
And then the rest of the humans become a contaminant.
They need to be gotten rid of.
And that's quite literally because all these same scientists are actually eugenicists to a T. And you don't really get into this level of this club If you're not a rabid believer in this ideology, and both of these institutions have been forever filled with rabid eugenicists who want most of the people to die.
And so it's not just a matter of nerds that want to play around with tech gadgets.
These are powerful individuals who have the same ideology that Kissinger outlines in State Department Memorandum 200, which is to drastically reduce the population.
So, yeah, that's what we're dealing with here is a kind of a cult.
And I think they quite literally believe that, you know, when you look at other people in the transhuman sphere that influence transhumanism, although they themselves might not have been working in the area of technology, we overlook so-called theologians like Teilhard de Chardin, who was this crazed Jesuit who predicted things like the Internet through his ideas of the Novosphere.
And Deschardin wasn't just a Jesuit who was a rabid worshiper of the evolutionary process, right?
He said God is kind of an emerging thing, emerging out of the world process.
And he says the God that's going to emerge out of this world process is when everything is interlinked at the realm of mind.
And that actually influenced a lot of people who were working in the Pentagon and the internet.
To develop the internet as the global mind, the global brain.
And so I really liked your analysis that you mentioned the other day.
Because I was asking you, like, well, some of these people talk about having, you know, bodies made that are fixed, that they could live in forever.
But then the other ones talk about, oh, no, it's going to be great.
You won't need a body. We'll upload you.
That's for the dummies, right?
Because you're not going to be uploaded.
You're going to be put in your, like, euthanasia pod.
And then from their vantage point, they'll fix their bodies or whatever to have some life extension or whatever.
So that's a dupe, I think, that they're going to play for the masses that, oh yeah, we're going to upload you the Matrix.
Just sign your euthanasia consent form right here.
Yeah, no, that's exactly it.
It's easier to manage you on the equivalent of a micro SD, not even a thumbstick, not even a micro SD. Let's be honest, folks.
I mean, they're putting terabytes of information and they've stated before, you know, the average person that lives for 100 plus years, they think they could put that on like eight or less terabytes.
They could probably compress that down.
You're nothing more than an algorithm to them.
And I'm so glad you mentioned that term, the global mind.
Because that's exactly what Bushnell refers to Google as and what that has been erected for.
And again, this gets back to that techno-fascist partnership where they're part of narrative management.
They're working with NASA, with artificial intelligence.
They're part of really the infrastructure of We're good to go.
Even those with nothing more than a smart TV. All your Roku software, all that's running on some kind of version of Android as well.
So they've also created an infrastructure where they have the public believing that that's a private company, Jay, even though it's a Russian dollhouse where Alphabet sits at the head.
You have Google, which is the most prevalent that people know about.
They run YouTube, which doesn't even have to be financially profitable for them because of that shell corporation.
And then you have the little known Calico, which is their immortality division.
And that gets back to what we were just discussing, because on one end...
Ray Kurzweil is writing about these entities that we will create in the age of spiritual machines that aren't necessarily conscious, but will trick us into believing, or at least get us to believe that they are conscious and give them rights.
They'll be very persuasive, as Ray says.
But at the very same time, he's working on Calico, which, just like you said, they're using biomimetics to try to rejuvenate life.
Not just live forever and enhance life, but actually reverse aging.
So again, speak to that aspect of it, because you talk about the Ubermensch and the Nazis.
Really, that is the eugenicist ideology, and it goes along with something else, social Darwinism.
Essentially, we rule so we deserve to rule because we're at the top of the evolutionary food chain.
Yeah, I just did a lengthy podcast last night as part of the reason my voice is gone is that I was in Nashville on a podcast with Dr.
James Lindsay who probably many people have heard of and another Pretty high up in a former Pentagon Intel guy who is named Stephen Coughlin who does a lot of analysis of dialectical warfare and dialectical warfare is something that is a strategy for how you manage control systems and it goes all the way back to Plato and I was surprised last night because as I got into this podcast with with him and Dr.
Lindsey we were able to go into This occult dimension of all this, because I know you're not talking about the occult right now, but what he was talking about was that all the way back to the time of Plato, you have this knowledge, this notion that you can govern society through managing dialectics.
Plato talks about it. But it's not just managing society.
There's also an aspect to it where they think that through dialectical process, and that's really what Darwinism is, is a form of dialectics, but It's dialectics just in terms of pure nature.
Because the survival of the fittest is what propels that process, right, to further the species.
Some of these people believe in an evolutionary ascent.
Now, why it's supposed to be going up and evolving forward, right, and not devolving, I don't know.
But they just assume that, oh, it's actually getting better and better and better.
We're progressing, right?
And technology has, the tech elite, have seized upon this.
Particularly technocrats and the technocracy movement seized upon the notions of Darwinian progress which are in many ways religious.
There's a religious element to this and ultimately it goes back to forms of Neoplatonism because the Neoplatonists thought that everything would be moving towards a pure unity.
That everything would move away from multiplicity and distinctions and it would evolve into a pure unity.
And that's exactly what the transhumanists believe, which is that the unification of all things must occur through the process of the technification of everything.
That's why everything will have the smart dust.
That's why everything will be Internet of Things.
Everything will be interlinked to the Skynet that you're talking about in terms of the global network of SkyNet is basically the net around the Earth that will link everything.
And then that will link everything in terms of the atmosphere to all of the things on the ground.
And that will all be modeled in terms of the simulate world systems, right?
Which are the supercomputers that will model and watch and everything in real time.
And eventually the idea is that there will be a reciprocal relationship between those where The centralized computer can also then control the things in the real world, right?
Because of the nanotech, because of supposedly the power of 5G, 6G, etc.
So Klaus goes into that too where he talks about we will have to get the 5G, 6G, 7G, whatever.
Able to handle all this massive data traffic because eventually what's going to happen is that everything will have the synthetic overlay and everything will evolve into something more than what it is.
That is all connected to Darwinism and because they worship Darwinism like a religion.
So again, there's nothing true, there's just the process.
And that's why many of them are, they favor socialism and forms of Marxism, because Marxism worships dialectical process.
For the Marxists, they believe that you can only be engaged in true Marxism when you're active, and you act to negate the existing system at all times, because the destruction of everything that is, Propels the system, the dialectic, to this final goal, which not all Marxists are transhumanists, but all transhumanists are in some way very much Marxist because they're furthering the dialectic to get to this omega point, which is from Hegel, the philosopher, where everything becomes unified into one thing.
Pure spirit, Hegel called it.
The transhumanists call it the singularity.
It's the same thing. So right now...
What we're seeing for the first time is the open commercialization and I would say militarization of robots and automation.
You could argue a lot of this stuff and I mean correctly so was beta tested via the war of terror overseas where you saw the first for instance robot dogs.
We now have a very sleek A commercialized around $70,000 robot dog that runs on Android, by the way, everybody.
And you can purchase this thing.
Now, you go back to 2003 to 2010, you can see the evolution of the big dog that was utilized in military combat that was actually just carrying cargo for the most part and helped carry out missions.
Now, we've seen the institution of robots being used as security in private estates,
very large ones, they're kind of clunky looking.
The robot dogs for a hot second were used in New York City via COVID.
Many people protested and stood up, but they were used in Singapore where social distancing
wasn't six feet, it was three feet because they had the robot dogs to tell you that a
meter was enough.
It seems like this is moving at a rapid pace as they sell you on things like the metaverse
commercially.
You can't watch something online or turn on the television or even scroll through something without some kind of ad for this VR. They're intersecting very quickly.
So how quickly do you think that intersection is going to happen to the point where we get to biomimetics being more acceptable?
Obviously, last night's presentation of a Neuralink is another step in that direction.
They're all heading to this crescendo that we're talking about, but where are we right now?
Right now we're at the rollout phase, right?
So this is the phase where it's rolling out after it's been normalized.
And if you remember in the Lockstep document, the first scenario was, it's called Lockstep,
the 2010 Rockefeller document.
It talks about how the worldwide PANDEMIC would potentially further the rollout of the
tech such that more and more things would be automated.
And so it actually discusses the fact that a global P-A-N-D-E-M-I-C would cause everybody to speed up the process of accepting the rollout of the things that we're talking about, right?
So this is being rolled out right now precisely because the lockstep document said that it would be great to do it after something like The coof that we just experienced, right?
It literally says that.
It says people will accept the automation because they've been trained to social distance, right?
So now we'll be much more amenable to working with or talking to a robot or something automated or a self-checkout than being close to a human being who's going to check me out at the grocery store, this kind of stuff.
So more and more of those catalyzing events Push forward this process.
I think that's what we saw in the last few years.
It had multiple functions, the whole goof scam.
And one of those functions was to do just that, to get us ready for the next business phase, which is the rollout of the stuff that you're talking about.
And so how amenable people are going to be, it's hard to say.
I think they We're testing the V-A-C-C-I-N-E passports to see how people would accept that.
People didn't really seem to accept that.
If you remember Google Glasses, when they tried to roll that out, that was a big failure.
So not everything that they try to roll out is accepted.
So whether people are ready for kiosks in the mall that will stick something in your brain, I don't think so.
But Maybe if they have a few more catalyzing events, this will roll out in a more forceful way.
And you know what? We're about five minutes from the premium section where we can talk a little bit more freely.
I want to talk about the possibility of those catalyzing events where we've seen the movement right now.
I mean, we talk about real-time censorship, right?
You talk about all this AI and how they say it's going to empower you with the global mind, but the global model is one of China.
And right now, China has an uprising.
You wouldn't know it by watching mainstream media.
You wouldn't know it by watching Fox News, really.
I mean, literally, you'd have to watch just about Tucker Carlson.
Some of the other players are talking about a little bit like Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity, but very much still, they're on the, hey, we still need to stop Russia and warmonger there.
Same with the Jesse Waters crew.
You don't even know what's going on, NBC, ABC. They're not even telling you tanks are rolling down.
World Cup is a total sham this year.
You know, they've been exposed for having to ship in fans to, again, exploit the idea that it's as popular as it is for the bunch of money laundering schemes that are going on in that big business.
But at the same time, China's not showing the citizens that are in the audience in real time they have their own feeds because none of them are wearing masks.
And that goes against their great narrative.
So, you know what, with that being said, Jay, and because I don't want to censor us anymore, and I think it's important to talk about not only lockstep, but how a lot of these things are war-gamed over the years, whether it be Dark Winter or the Spars document.
To how that really relates to the technology rollout and the IMF, the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, not only being powered through that, but coming out with these measures and talking about technology as the solution.
So I'm going to give the heads up to the producers on the other side, and I'm going to start saying goodbye one by one.
So, Rumble, we're going to say goodbye to you first.
Goodbye, Rumble. Rockfin, I love you.
We'll see you on the flip. By the way, guys, again, every two weeks, they release my second hour for free.
It's over at redvoicemedia.com slash Jason right now if you do want to sign up for the uncensored part of the broadcast.
YouTube, come on over.
Support Independent Media.
▲
Export Selection