Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 16, 2022 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas

01:03:03

Trump Announces 2024 Campaign! Media Immediately Attacks - Reality Rants With Jason Bermas

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in.
	Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want.
	We think too much and feel too little.
	More than machinery, we need humanity.
	We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be.
	We know things are bad, worse than bad.
	They're crazy.
	Silence!
	The great and powerful Oz knows why you have come.
	You've got to say, I'm a human being!
	God damn it! My life has value!
	You have meddled with the primal forces of nature!
	Don't give yourselves to brutes, men who despise you, enslave you, who regiment your lives, tell you what to do, what to think, or what to feel, who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder!
	Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men, machine men with machine minds and machine hearts.
	Yeah, thank you, you're beautiful.
	I love you, yes.
	You're beautiful.
	Thank you.
	It's...
	Showtime!
	And now, Reality Rant with Jason Burmess.
	And who loves you?
	And who do you love?
	What is up, everybody?
	It is Reality Rants with Jason Bermas, presented by Red Voice Media.
	Now, we're going to switch it up a little bit today because YouTube, although people think that they're being a little bit easier with their fact checks and takedowns, is really a place where you can't openly discuss We're good to go.
	What we're going to do is, don't worry, the first hour is still going to be video free.
	But after about 30 minutes or so, we're going to have to go off of YouTube.
	You're going to have to come over to either one of the Rumble channels, MyRockVin, perhaps Twitter, to watch the other 30 minutes of the free segment.
	And that segment...
	It's going to be with Craig Pasta Giardula.
	And it's a really important segment.
	We did it last night in a pre-record on the one-week anniversary of the selection.
	And look, here's the deal.
	If people saw my thumbnail and saw this title and they think that this is going to be a Trump endorsement video, no.
	Far from it, actually.
	It's not going to be a Trump endorsement video.
	And the odd thing about that is I'm supposed to be doing a pre-record with Roger Stone later today where largely I'm going to talk about this announcement, the run, the midterms, the infrastructure of the system, and much more.
	Like, who would be the ideal cabinet under Trump if he were to be elected?
	With all that being said, I also have to acknowledge reality.
	As much as I don't like some of the things that Trump did and continues to say, especially in regards to Operation Warp Speed and that response, especially in regards to the foreign policy, was it better than Obama?
	Was it better than Bush?
	Either Bush? In a way.
	But it was also more hidden and the infrastructure kept being built up through mercenary groups and other military contracts and kind of the wars that were going on in the backdrop, right?
	Not standing up. When he wanted to get out of Syria, that was a big mistake.
	Big, big mistake.
	And then signing on to the Yemen campaign.
	Okay, those are things you still have to hold the guy accountable for, right?
	Right? And everybody's kind of known that Trump was going to run.
	Kind of an open secret.
	We're just waiting for the actual announcement.
	And then yesterday, it came out that he was going to give a special announcement, a big announcement at Mar-a-Lago.
	And moments before he gives that big announcement, it's revealed in the media that he has indeed filed paperwork to run in 2024.
	Let's start with that speech, first of all.
	Now, as you guys know, because you guys watch me, or if you haven't, I'm going to clue you in.
	I watch these things long form.
	A lot. A lot.
	And what do I mean by these things?
	Whether it be a speech, a public address, the State of the Union, an interview.
	I watch the long form, especially when it's live.
	When it's live, I really want to see how people are interacting with the audience, interacting with the camera, interacting with the pre-written speech.
	Now, Trump is infamous for going off the script all the time and actually being extremely good at that.
	There is no doubt the man, at least in the past, has commanded an audience through his speech and through his wit.
	And his quick acting brain.
	You have to give him that credit.
	Okay? What I saw yesterday, I'll be honest, it wasn't very impressive.
	And I don't think it's rust. I think the fact that this guy is getting old and that he has been impeached twice and that there are criminal investigations going on and they are going after his kids has worn on the guy.
	Okay? What do I mean by that?
	Well, Look, did he look better and sound better than Joe Biden?
	By a long shot.
	Not a comparison, not close.
	That's also almost like cartoon level.
	The fact that the media still wants us to believe that Joe Biden runs anything is like over the top.
	Over that doesn't know where he is, can barely speak.
	I watched those long form.
	Those are really painful to watch.
	At least Trump, when I watched them, some of the rhetoric was good.
	Some of the actions were good.
	And the speeches were usually entertaining.
	Yesterday, aside from the fact that he did know that Joe Biden didn't know what country he was in at one of these climate summits, Wasn't sharp.
	He has stammered a lot on the pre-written speech.
	You could see it. He wasn't reading it on beat.
	A good example of that is...
	I caught Tucker on Monday, and Tulsi Gabbard was there.
	And look, Tulsi Gabbard, again, has a lot of positives, some negatives.
	Actually had a short discussion about Tulsi Gabbard with Ray, who runs Red Voice Media, in an upcoming behind-the-scenes kind of podcast.
	I hope everybody checks that out and my opinions on Tulsi and give you some insight there.
	But she wasn't really comfortable reading off that prompter.
	And so she wasn't on beat.
	Like people that do podcasting or broadcasting, largely the ones that are successful, especially the ones that are genuine, they're still on beat.
	Comedians, they're on like a certain beat.
	And you can tell when things get awkward.
	Trump was the king of being on beat.
	Moving the hands.
	Got some of this going on.
	Taking the pause.
	Emphasizing things.
	Very good at that.
	Excellent at it, actually.
	Wasn't quite there last night.
	Okay? Now, aside from that, let's get into the headlines.
	There is no doubt in my mind...
	That this guy is the most popular president of my life.
	And I'm going to say that that's even bigger than Reagan and even bigger than Obama.
	Okay, and what do I mean by that?
	Obama may have had some of that traction early on, but it faded back.
	Over the eight years.
	Okay? And really a lot of that was manufactured in the beginning.
	And don't get me wrong. Trump and his hype train is tremendous.
	Tremendous. But you never had like an Obama movement on tour before.
	In several respects, like, you could talk about Reawaken America and Clay Clark, and obviously that's overwhelmingly pro-Trump and tons of merchandise there.
	But you have those type of things going on all the time.
	You have the President of the United States himself during his presidency, especially towards the end, already on campaign trail, right?
	You know, having stadiums and bases filled up with people.
	And then there was a side cottage industry in that alone.
	I've never seen that.
	And believe me, during the 80s when everything was like red, white, and blue, American pie, say your prayers, eat your vitamins, big muscles, heroes, we're number one military stuff.
	And Reagan himself was an actor, and I would also argue pretty popular.
	Nowhere near Trump. Nowhere near him.
	It wasn't there.
	And a lot of people, whether they liked it or not, especially in the middle class and after the first election, that they might not take a part in.
	Believe me, I was in New York and I talked to a lot of these people.
	When they saw early on that not only was Trump being attacked, but he wasn't expanding wars.
	And here's the most important thing.
	There was more money in the vast majority of their paychecks.
	With his tax cuts. In their paychecks.
	Yeah, was it a big tax cut for the rich?
	Sure. But in their paychecks, They started to see that.
	And they did see a better economy than what they were given over this time period where you had the housing crisis and the banker bailout and all these things that were then unprecedented and seemed like a walk in the park compared to what we've been through at this point.
	Okay? So...
	I watched this and I know that Trump is going to end up being the nominee.
	Unless, and here's the big caveat, and this caveat could be real.
	They find a way to criminally indict him.
	Which, they're in the works.
	There's a reason the Justice Department went into Mar-a-Lago and took all those documents and started talking about nuclear secrets and every other Johnny nonsense thing they could.
	I acknowledge that.
	There's a reason.
	The Attorney General in New York has now gone after him in lawsuits.
	It's ridiculous.
	And they don't want him to run, period.
	Which, maybe they do up until a point, and then they're going to pull the trigger on these things.
	Joe Biden, there's no promise for tomorrow for Joe.
	And what do I mean by that?
	I mean, there might be a tipping point.
	And that he could be out somewhere.
	You saw him at this latest thing next to Trudeau.
	We played the video, I think it was yesterday.
	And I think I played it the day before because it's so unbelievable.
	He doesn't know where he is. He's asking the Secret Service guys all around him where he's going.
	He might be having relapses right there.
	That he's the vice president.
	Or he's, you know, a senator on some kind of like ambassador's trail.
	Or who knows? Or he's cutting his first corrupt deal out in Delaware as an up-and-coming senator.
	He's plagiarizing some speech.
	Who knows what he's thinking?
	I couldn't tell you.
	But is he thinking he's actually running the country?
	No. No.
	Because he doesn't know what's going on. That's sad.
	And then, you know, I hear more and more, the media went out and attacked Trump right away.
	And one of the things, let me say this, that I also did not love About Trump is when he came at the media in this speech, he did so that he backed all these candidates that did win and then they focused on the ones that lost.
	Instead of focusing on the fact that no one's changed the infrastructure.
	Let me repeat that. No one has changed the infrastructure whatsoever.
	And that's really what we're going to be talking about with pasta giardula.
	Instead, it was almost like an ego thing.
	And that's at the crux of the problem with Trump, right?
	The policies might be good.
	The rhetoric might be great.
	But at the end of the day, the ego cost us all.
	Cost us all.
	We could talk about all the Fauci and nonsense.
	That was enabled by him.
	Mike Pompeo, not your buddy, guy.
	Not your friend, pal.
	Not good. He gave that guy power.
	Bill Barr, no. No, no, no, no, no, no, no.
	You don't want Bill Barr anywhere near anything.
	The cleaner, Bill Barr, no.
	No. So, I've got to be convinced that, first of all, that you have a system that I think is still clearly corrupt, and you can fix that infrastructure.
	Because then how do you get him in?
	And then how does he establish an actual cabinet that works around him?
	It's a great question. Here's the deal.
	Again, we're going to go for about 15 more minutes on YouTube, then we're going to play that interview.
	Please, if you are a subscriber, come over to Rockfin, go check out the Rumbles, the Twitter, or you can just go right over to Red Voice Media.
	Remember, the second hour, although it is premium, and I hope that you do sign up at redvoicemedia.com slash Jason, you can also listen to the second hour for free in real time over at Podbean, and you can get the archives in audio format.
	At Podbean, and we'll be releasing the second hour from two weeks ago again today.
	So really, this cyclic archive of stuff is out there for you to share with people.
	This is kind of big, but at the same time, it's almost like they're talking out of both sides of their mouth.
	Facebook says it won't fact-check Trump now that he is running for president again, citing Meta's policy to exempt active politicians from third-party fact-checking.
	What? First of all, this fact-checking is awful.
	These context things are awful.
	I put up that video about Oklahoma City.
	That has context of it.
	Anything that's a large-scale event that someone like Jason Bermas wants to dare comment on gets a context rating.
	And now you're just, Facebook's opening it up to the idea that politicians are now allowed to lie, but the general public isn't allowed to lie.
	And it's not really lying. We all know that with these fact checks from authoritative sources.
	They're not telling you how the algorithm is going to run in which you're able to see these ads or how effective they will be or who sees them when you share them or information surrounding them.
	So you start sharing, for instance, news stories or proof that the ad itself or the campaign rhetoric is true and that gets suppressed.
	Guys, I've got, I think it's like close to 5,000 actual friends on my regular Facebook.
	My regular one. Then I have some stupid fan page I never really do anything with, but it's got some auto posts with the pod bean and yada yada yada.
	I get no traction over on Facebook.
	No traction.
	I should be getting hundreds or thousands of interactions with those.
	And then at one point I was running the We Are Change page, which I think had more than half a million.
	Half a million, right?
	So, we were actually spending money with Facebook.
	Nothing. I mean, it was ridiculous.
	It's like you're paying for this stuff.
	I'm not sure if Cernovich still has that lawsuit going, but it's a valid one.
	Okay? So, Facebook says that it is not fact-checking.
	Okay? Now, the media is running with a bunch of different narratives.
	Okay? And one of those narratives is this DeSantis versus Trump.
	Another narrative that you saw out of the gates, and we're going to play this clip in a moment, is Anderson Cooper talking to former chief of staff at Trump.
	Because everybody's just coming out of the woodwork.
	No, don't run. Don't run.
	Don't run. Pence. Pence was on TV. Who was it with Brett Baer?
	Pence, it was terrible.
	A terrible choice. There's another one that's not your friend.
	Your Vice President Pence?
	My goodness. I just think that people are ready to move to new leadership.
	Everybody's got a talking point.
	God, they're so full of shit.
	Hard to watch, quite frankly.
	But Mick Mulvaney basically says that Trump is the only one that can lose.
	Acknowledging how bad everything is around us.
	How unpopular the most popular and voted for president really is.
	How unpopular the policies of that administration is.
	Right? Basically saying we could run anybody but Trump.
	That person will win.
	But Trump won't win.
	Why won't Trump win?
	Are they going to fortify the election against them?
	The guy's wildly popular.
	Let me say it again. Wildly popular.
	I'm just acknowledging.
	What is it? Let's look up to the top here.
	Reality. This is a little rant for me.
	All right, so before we get to the pasta interview, let's watch this segment with
	Anderson Cooper and Mick Mulvaney. Former president of the United States became the
	first Republican to declare his candidacy for the 2024 presidential election, saying America's
	comeback starts right now. A historic moment in politics that comes despite multiple federal and
	state investigations to impeachments, inspiring the January 6th rioters and attempted coup and
	criticism over his role in Republicans' underwhelming performance in the midterms.
	I mean, think about that intro right there.
	Every talking point you can imagine.
	Inspiring the January 6th riots.
	And they constantly go and show that hang Mike Pence thing with that noose.
	It's a joke.
	That's not a gallo.
	That's not reality. They didn't really actually bring up a gallo.
	That probably couldn't take maybe an infant.
	Right? And it's infantile, what he's saying.
	The coup. There was no coup.
	It's every single talking point.
	But they also let you know that the cartel disliked this guy so much, there's two impeachments.
	And then, you know, the kick him while he's down is the, hey, the big people that were backing you in your campaign, they didn't get in.
	We fortified another one!
	Anderson Cooper! Woo!
	Woo! Go Anderson.
	I'm joined now by Mick Mulvaney, who served as acting chief of staff for the former president.
	Previously, he was a Republican member of Congress from South Carolina.
	Mr. Mulvaney, I appreciate you being with us.
	I'm wondering what you thought of the president's announcement.
	Yeah, well, I think it's still going on.
	I stepped away to do this interview.
	What struck me, Anderson, was that he stayed on script almost the entire time, even when you folks Well, let me address what they're talking about here.
	I'm kind of with Mulvaney on this one.
	That's what I mean. He didn't have a beat.
	I saw him reading off both prompters.
	He wasn't hitting the inflection points right.
	He was getting some of the words wrong.
	He's getting older. He's getting older.
	At the same time, Biden can barely speak for five minutes and not well.
	When they got him up there for 20, it's a train wreck.
	I mean, it's not quite a Fetterman, but does that even matter at this point in the post-truth world, right?
	But he still went for like 45 minutes, an hour, no problem.
	The guy has endurance.
	No doubt about it.
	Yeah, little bits and pieces, but he hadn't got into the part that I wanted to see, which is, was he going to speak about Ron DeSantis, was he going to speak about Glenn Youngkin, all of his potential challengers?
	So in other words, right here, right out of the gates, what's the first talking point?
	Let's start division within the party.
	The party's a joke, guys.
	I'm sorry. Kevin McCarthy is going to be, that's who they're promoting as the Speaker of the House?
	This is Establishment Politics 101.
	And what is this guy doing?
	He's on Anderson Cooper immediately trying to sow division amongst DeSantis and Trump and Youngkin.
	Basically anybody that challenged any aspect of the establishment narrative of COVID-1984.
	And some of their policies, quite frankly, didn't go far enough.
	I'm not a huge fan of.
	And some of the things they still promote, I'm not a huge fan of.
	Period. But this is how it works.
	My guess is the speech probably goes on for a while now.
	But that was what sort of struck me.
	Trump doesn't like to stay on script.
	He likes to have a script. What he does is he'll start on script and leave and talk about what he really wants to talk about and then come back to the script and then leave and then come back.
	And I didn't really see that tonight.
	And that's a difference. The only time I've seen that out of him, Anderson, was a couple of times at the State of the Union and then the United Nations General Assembly.
	He was clearly taking this thing very seriously tonight.
	I just don't know if he's got the discipline to continue to do that as he moves forward.
	Who does he have around him that's actually got a lot of experience?
	How do you think he's going to run?
	I think this is the dumbest question I've ever heard in my life.
	Who does he have around him?
	The guy was the President of the United States.
	We already know the people that were around him.
	And I don't think that...
	Mulvaney talks about Roger Stone, but obviously Roger Stone is somewhat in the know and still speaks to Trump, and has always worked kind of behind the scenes, even before this run in 2016, in my opinion.
	He openly talks about setting that up.
	Now, I think that this is on purpose to bring up someone like Bannon, Who's now been convicted and they're trying to work out what?
	His time in jail.
	All this is going to be guilt by association.
	Yeah, I mean, there's Jason Miller is there.
	I guess Stephen Miller is probably there.
	Steve Bannon is always sort of around.
	So I mean, it's sort of a mishmash, right?
	And then there's some new folks.
	The real question is, is the team that is with him tonight going to be the team that is with him three months from now or six months from now or a year from now?
	Probably not, by the way.
	That wouldn't be the only campaign that goes through changes during the course of a long campaign.
	I mean, it's just crazy to me.
	That we're still looking at election results a week plus later.
	And in a few minutes, after we get done with this, we're going to go to my interview with Pasta Jardula.
	Again, that's going to be at Rumble and Rockfin for the next 30 plus minutes.
	And then we're going to move over...
	To the premium section at redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
	You see the link right there.
	For $1, you can sign up to support the broadcast.
	Or it is $10 a month, $100 for the year.
	You lock that in, that's even better.
	And we've got about an hour-long interview with Pastor Craig Hagan.
	A lot of interesting things that you wouldn't think does come up, outside of religion especially.
	But certainly Trump, more than many perhaps, is probably interested in changing people as he goes.
	So The A team is probably gone by now.
	It really is. The folks that helped him get in 2016, most of those folks are gone.
	So I don't know who the inner circle is.
	I don't know who's advising him.
	But clearly, he decided himself tonight that he was going to To stick to the script.
	And that's a major change in the way that Donald Trump makes these sorts of announcements.
	Certainly what we have been hearing from a lot of Republicans, even the reporters we had who talked to people in the Trump camp, there weren't many people who felt he should announce right now.
	First of all, he's already kind of announced.
	And then everybody's trying to take the wind out of his sails because there wasn't the red wave.
	And the MAGA Republicans, according to Joe Biden, when he can read off the script barely, are the greatest threat to democracy that the United States of America has ever known.
	That humanity has ever known.
	Those dirty, filthy MAGA Republicans.
	Look, love it or hate it, the vast majority of the traditional conservative party no longer exists.
	It no longer exists.
	Because even...
	The vast majority of establishment Republican types that followed that way, conservatives, that weren't part of the power structure.
	In other words, not talking heads or minions for a predator class agenda.
	As things move forward, they actually, whether they like Trump personally or not, they liked his policies.
	They did. But we can't acknowledge it.
	They're the vast majority of the party.
	And the vast majority of this country doesn't like what they have right now, doesn't like the infrastructure we have right now on voting.
	And that's not even on the table.
	That's not even a talking point here.
	Do you think it was wise for him to do this?
	I don't think he had a choice.
	In his mind, he didn't have a choice.
	Remember he announced this, Anderson, before last Tuesday's midterms.
	I think it was Sunday or Monday before the midterms.
	So in his mind, he had to do it tonight.
	He had committed to that.
	Trump doesn't reschedule.
	He would have perceived that as weakness if he didn't do it tonight.
	Do I think it was a good idea?
	No.
	It certainly has some advantages to him.
	It's certainly when it comes to the DOJ investigation, maybe he makes it look like it's more political.
	Maybe he makes it look like it's more political?
	Come on Mulvaney.
	The whole thing is political.
	The impeachments were political.
	I don't think that really changes many people's minds.
	He loses the RNC money that he's been receiving for his state lawsuits up in New York, so there's a negative there.
	But do I think he needed to do it tonight?
	No. But once he committed to doing it last week, he didn't really have any choice in his own mind.
	Do you think this is good for the Republican Party?
	No, I don't, because I think he's the only Republican who could lose.
	I think he's the only Republican that could lose.
	It's almost like a threat, right?
	It's like, we'll take any other person.
	We don't like this guy. But that's not true.
	That's not true. If they really wanted, and you wanted a strong candidate, according to Jason Burmus, Rand Paul's the man.
	And I've got my problems with Rand.
	He's far from perfect.
	He's the one that had the biggest cojones, in my opinion, during the COVID-1984 nightmare.
	There's some others.
	But he's also the best one on foreign policy and anti-war.
	Somebody like Thomas Massey would be tremendous.
	Not even on the table.
	Okay, here's the deal, YouTube.
	I want you to thumbs it up.
	Subscribe and share, but at the same time, it's almost Arrivederci time for you.
	Why is it almost Arrivederci time?
	Well, we're going to play this interview with Craig Pasta, still part of the free broadcast, everybody.
	I just can't talk about election fraud on YouTube.
	It's not allowed. There's medical misinformation.
	And now there's malinformation and pre-bunking when it comes to elections.
	You can't discuss the fact we're past the one-week anniversary of the selections, and we still don't have clear winners.
	Okay, so YouTube, it's been real, but we're going to have to see you later.
	And that's it for YouTube.
	So... With that being said, I want to move it over to my friend.
	Look, here's the deal.
	Nobody's perfect. Nobody's going to get it all right.
	I know some people weren't thrilled with what Pasta had to say about the elections with Bolsonaro.
	But he's also one of the guys in the arena, and he's there.
	He's actually doing the stuff.
	So I hope you also saw that interview.
	That's also now free on Red Voice Media.
	That was one of the premiums originally.
	I think that's from like...
	Four or five weeks back at this point.
	I would encourage people to check that out as well.
	But here it is.
	Here's my interview with Craig Pasta-Jardula.
	Hey everybody, Jason Bermas here, and in this next segment, we're going to try to get to the bottom of what actually occurred during the midterm elections.
	Some of us, myself included, were saying, hey, wait a minute, the infrastructure hasn't changed.
	It actually got worse after COVID-1984 and nobody reined it in.
	So, for the next 30 minutes or so, we've got somebody who's been in the election fraud and anomalies business for some time, not just in the United States, but internationally.
	He is the co-host of AM Wake Up and the Convo Couch, Craig Pasta-Jardula.
	Thank you for joining us. How are you doing, sir?
	I'm doing amazing, all things considered, that we just had an election a week ago, even though we had some results come in yesterday.
	And like you said, the infrastructure is a shit show.
	But aside from that, thank you so much for always bringing me on your platform and getting to get this news out there.
	And I just want to send a special love and big ups to Addy Ads, who actually is in Brazil now, talking about elections I go and cover.
	I covered the Brazilian elections, and now he just went over there yesterday to cover What's going on?
	So special love to him out there.
	Well, that's excellent, and we love the work that he's doing, and he has expanded so much just recently and continues to strive forward.
	So it's the one-week anniversary.
	It's a Tuesday. We now have anniversaries of elections that haven't been called.
	It's the one-week anniversary!
	We're not sure if this is, you know, the silver band, or maybe we're going to get the gold, maybe the runoff's the diamond.
	I don't know. You know, elections are forever, right, pasta?
	Yeah. And what seemed like not only to many was going to be a red wave, but what seemed to be in Arizona, which felt like a very red state, To go to, obviously, what many, many people thought was a frontrunner, Cary Lake, and also Blake Masters in his race, to not happen and now become official that yet another politician that refused to debate, that didn't really have a national presence or a platform people seem to agree with,
	has been installed yet again, Pasta.
	And out of all...
	The corruption, and I would say that it was extremely vast in these midterms, and especially in those swing states and close races the media kept an eye on.
	Wink, wink. Arizona is probably the most heinous.
	What are your thoughts?
	Well, it's the most heinous because I think it's the most in the spotlight, right?
	The most popular candidate in this election, I think, by far, was Carrie Lake.
	Certainly, if you look at her numbers on Twitter, her followers, all her posts, everything, how the media just matriculated around her and they attacked her, but yet she was always calm, cool, took them on.
	She almost flipped it on its whole face.
	She kind of came up with this whole method of filming the media, filming you, so therefore they can't Doctor anything up or kind of mislead people or change the narrative.
	I mean, she had an outstanding campaign, very much like she.
	Tulsi Gabbard even came on in, national spotlight, endorsed her at the very end.
	And she ran against somebody by the name of Katie Hobbs, who happened to be the Secretary of State.
	No conflict of interest there running the election.
	No, no, no. I mean, she's the one who presided over the last election that was shown to have so many inaccuracies.
	They had an audit and whatnot.
	She ran that election along with Adrian Fontes, who had Bill Gates' position, who Bill Gates was the Maricopa election official.
	I don't know if they had the same position, but he oversaw the election with Katie Hobbs.
	And he... Ran for Secretary of State in one.
	And that's the other part that a lot of people aren't looking about, is that Mark Fincham, who was kind of like smeared as this MAGA guy who went to the Capitol, who was there on January 6th and was awful.
	And he's an election denier.
	He's not an election denier.
	He's an election reformist.
	He didn't get elected either, and the numbers that are coming in his election are a little weird.
	But like you alluded to earlier in the show, it's the infrastructure that's in place.
	The election system really got out of whack in 2002 when Congress signed, along with George W. Bush,
	because he can't just get credit for Iraq and the Patriot Act,
	he needs to also get credit for the Help America Vote Act, the HAVA Act, which was signed in,
	which allowed all these private equity companies, meaning that you don't know who owns them,
	come on in and swoop over the whole system with lucrative contracts, with proprietary software,
	come on in and swoop over the whole system with lucrative contracts, with proprietary software,
	and then couple that with the COVID era of all these other rules on top of it,
	and then couple that with the COVID era of all these other rules on top of it,
	and the structure for our elections is so far out of whack.
	and the structure for our elections is so far out of whack.
	Jason, I can say with confidence right now that the outcome has already been decided
	Jason, I can say with confidence right now that the outcome has already been decided
	before these elections even take place right now.
	before these elections even take place right now.
	That's how crazy it is, and that's what we're facing right now,
	That's how crazy it is, and that's what we're facing right now,
	and that's why Arizona seems so bad.
	But then you also have Nevada, where I live over here, where the rules are out of whack.
	I sent you a tweet of me getting taken down, where they have all these rules that they made permanent
	in 2021 from the COVID, and they just lost that.
	And another election reformist, Jim Marchand, smeared as a conspiracy theorist,
	awful guy, wants to get rid of early voting, doesn't want minorities to vote, wants you to have ID,
	wants to get rid of ballot harvest.
	all these awful things.
	Well, he lost to a guy that didn't even campaign.
	And in fact, his commercials, the guy who we ran against, and I don't even know his name, Aguilar, whatever, Junior, Cisco, His commercials on the news, on the radio, on Jason, they're all over the place.
	In Nevada, you can't avoid the billboards that are out there, the mail that comes in.
	It's oversaturated with this crap.
	He couldn't even do his own radio commercials.
	The woman who won for the Senate position, Cortez Mastro, she would do his commercials.
	That's how a nobody this guy was.
	Well, he won his election, too.
	So on top of just having all these crazy fugazi results and Carrie Lake, who was the most attacked for elections, by the way.
	Notice that Ron DeSantis didn't get attacked about elections the way Carrie Lake did.
	Because Carrie Lake was the real deal.
	She's an election reformist.
	combine that with the secretary of state and you can turn the whole system upside down.
	They were planning to go back to the basics of elections, hand marked paper ballots, counting in public.
	You know, Jim Marchand had forced Nye to do, got them to move to do a hand count that was squashed.
	Well, you can't have any of that.
	So all this is blown up and that's what's really not coming to the light right now,
	that the secretaries of states, that we were election reformist candidates,
	smeared as Trumpist, seditionist, did not win.
	And it's kind of crazy the fact that they didn't win either.
	Well, it's kind of crazy that that's the narrative when we're gonna take it all the way back
	to what you just talked about, 2002 election reform, HAVA.
	And really what was the fast track of machine voting and what would become fractional voting
	and less and less accountability.
	In fact, although the media...
	Often focused, when they talked about the Carter-Baker Commission, on the idea of the mail-in ballots being there for fraud.
	Carter himself highlighted that these machines would be ripe for fraud.
	And bare minimum, there should be a 3% random audit of the machines.
	What kind of an audit system, random audit system, do we get on these machines, Mr.
	Jardula? Well, uh...
	The FEC, right?
	The Federal Elections Commission?
	They're the ones who decide.
	They're in cahoots with these other companies.
	They're the ones who have to justify or approve their contracts.
	The whole system is just completely co-opted.
	That's what HAVA did. It brought in these tabulation contracts.
	Which is something I want to talk about.
	Dominion Voting, ES&S, Smartmatic, which is part of the heart systems.
	There's three companies that dominate the tabulation.
	It's not just about electronical voting, because even when the county switch to a hand-marked paper ballot and say whatnot, it's the tabulation machines, the ones that count the vote.
	That's who's owning the system, and that's what the HAVA Act brought in.
	So even if there's these random kind of audits, what is an audit, right?
	When people go, oh, we need a recount, right?
	They think that they're doing something.
	No, recounts don't mean anything because in a recount, you have to count the ballots that are in front of you.
	If those ballots are fraudulent, Then what does a recount mean?
	You're just counting fraudulent ballots.
	Same thing with the audit system.
	They don't really audit the ballots or audit the ballots.
	They audit just to make sure their audits are, oh, the system's working right now.
	It's counting properly.
	That's an audit and they sell that off as if they had some form of checks and balance when they didn't.
	It's all a scam.
	Well, it's also semantics and a mirage, right?
	So, in other words, when you had officials asked about the integrity and security of the 2020 elections, you know, bald-faced lie, they're the most secure elections we ever had, and they were discussing only in relation to Russian foreign hacking.
	Everything else wasn't investigated and was completely off the table.
	And when they were asked about that, if they actually looked into certain aspects, they said, no, that's not what we were talking about when we said that.
	Yeah. I mean, there's only Russian hacking if the team, if the Democrats lose really, really badly, or if they lose at the top of the ticket.
	So I mean, you know what I'm saying?
	I mean, it's a completely bought out system.
	It's like the healthcare system, right?
	It's completely controlled.
	It's big money interest.
	It goes all the way to the top.
	I mean, Just think about it.
	And this is why I say that elections, you know, it has a lot of global ramifications involved because these people who are selected to go into office, they're going to do the bidding of the World Economic Forum and the WHO and everything else.
	This is the control mechanism right here, Jay.
	It's our elections. This is supposed to be the vessel to get us to our civil servants, to get us to our choice.
	But they have it completely co-opted in control right now, and it's a completely...
	Blown-up system right now.
	I mean, we are in some bad, bad times.
	I don't know how things are going to change for 2024.
	All we can do is keep presenting the math, because every single election has math.
	And the math I'm getting in right now from Arizona, the basic math they want to sell you, Jay.
	This is it. Check this out. They want you to believe, ladies and gentlemen, that one in five Republicans, and they go, oh, it's the younger Republicans, voted for Katie Hobbs.
	Dude, I don't think one of five Republicans know about Katie Hobbs.
	She didn't even come out of her goddamn basement.
	But that's the math they're throwing at you.
	But when you start looking at all the other math, for instance, the early mail-out ballots.
	There was about 3 million of them mailed out in Arizona and Maricopa County because they don't have mass universal mail-outs like Vegas.
	But they have something else, which is a good enough weapon for them to cheat elections.
	They have a list. They have an early voters list.
	And they haven't messed with that list in a long-ass time, man.
	You know what I'm saying? So there's names on that list out there that probably have – people have died or moved.
	Got the same problems in Nevada too as well where we've seen like 40,000 people who are either dead or moved that are still on the voter list in Nevada and a ballot went out to them.
	But in Arizona, back to Arizona, I mean three million of those ballots went out.
	Only a million of them came back.
	And I'm getting the numbers on them right now, and they're just not adding up.
	So just to think about that basic math right there, if three million ballots go out, one million come back, where are the other two million ballots?
	And if you've got a whole week to count an election, man, I can get you some ballots over there.
	They're easy out there. You know what I'm saying?
	It's easy for elected officials who are attached to the system, like Katie Hobbs.
	Who is the Secretary of State running on her own election to get a hold of these ballots to make sure the numbers go in her favor.
	And I don't think she's the one pulling the strings.
	I think she's just taking the orders.
	But they got the whole system set up.
	Well, you'll never know what's what.
	And they can give you the results they want, not the results that we want.
	You know, I would have to agree with you, and I had Patrick Byrne on my program yesterday, and he basically said that the longer that these elections take, the easier it is for them to be co-opted and to be put into the hands of the selected official, not the elected official.
	Why is that, Pasta?
	Why is what? The fact that the longer it takes, the more time you have to cheat?
	Or the fact is, why are they?
	I mean, the longer the election is, and I keep saying this, it's like they're just going to keep counting until they get the results they want.
	The longer it is, the longer the time the election is.
	This is the whole thing where they're trying to go after a lot of the conservatives or the America First people by saying, why are you against early voting?
	Why are you against letting minorities and the most vulnerable in our society have a say in what we're doing moving forward?
	That's the attack. But the truth of the matter is, the longer the election is, the more time for fraud, the less security there is.
	That's why these elections take place in one day overseas in Colombia, in Nicaragua, in Honduras, in Brazil.
	One day. Because it's all about security.
	And at the end of the day, we want to let as many people vote as possible.
	but you can never give up security in the name of accessibility.
	And they're selling the accessibility as a racial issue here in the States.
	That if you're not for accessibility, if you're not for drop boxes two weeks before,
	a week after that these mail-ins can come in, then you're being racist.
	But the longer you have to cheat, you know, the less the security is,
	the more results that will favor the ruling class.
	It's just that simple.
	That's why we talk about the chain of custody.
	That ballot staying in front of the public's eyes the whole time from when it was picked up, voted into the drop box until it's counted.
	The more days you have of that, the more the ballots get out of the chain of custody, the more chance you have for cheating, the easier it is.
	That's why. I absolutely agree with you, and that's why, as we've been talking now for years, it's been a couple years, I think, since we've known each other, that the infrastructure has to be changed to one of in-person voting, where we use technology to empower people.
	Not obfuscate the system and not corrupt the system, right?
	So in other words, we want one person, one vote with identification.
	That vote is counted by another person, which is checked by another person.
	I would then say the technology should be a webcam.
	And it'd be very easy to do.
	You have something that just blocks the signature on these things.
	And that way, only these two people could see the signature.
	Very easy device. But that you can see in real time what the vote is.
	And you can hand count it like God intended.
	Like we knew how to do it.
	You don't even need to block out the signature if you have a system where you go in and you sign in and then you get a ballot and it's dropped and that ballot stays in the drop box until it's taken out and counted.
	You don't even need a signature on that ballot.
	You can just sign in.
	And then in Nicaragua and Honduras, they mark the finger with black or blue ink so you can't vote again.
	You know what I'm saying? I mean, it is so simple.
	We can fix this tomorrow.
	The oldest scam is keep the people divided so the oligarchs can run off with all the money and the resources.
	But the biggest scam they have right now...
	It's convincing Americans that they can't have clean, free, fair, transparent elections that are trackable in one day results.
	That's the biggest scam because it's math.
	It's basic.
	It's counting. You know what I'm saying?
	You have a lot of votes to count.
	You get more people to count them.
	It's that simple. And you keep it in front of the public's eye the whole time.
	It's ridiculous. But like I said, the social engineers out there, Jay, they know how to move people in the right direction.
	And they have people who are saying early voting, drop boxes, you're being racist.
	And that's how they get you.
	It's crazy how elections are just like every other issue out there where they're meant to divide people.
	So now people are yelling at each other for the election rules rather than yelling at the people upstairs.
	It's the same game over and over again.
	I 100% agree.
	And the race card has constantly been pulled out there politically, not only in the validity of elections, but I remember if you were in opposition to Obama when he was running in 2008, like the ultimate card, oh, you don't like him because he's black.
	And I'd be like, well, actually, I voted in 2008 for a black woman who was running in the Green Party, Cynthia McKinney.
	And They're kind of taken aback because most of them don't know what the Green Party is or who Cynthia McKinney is or why she matters.
	And usually that's the end of the conversation.
	But we now live in this society where the race card is pulled like, you might as well be playing with five or six decks at a casino and they just throw it at you.
	They don't even care. Everything is race-based when we have to realize that the real division...
	Is the people at the top and then these minions that are kind of, again, not elected but selected at this point, trying to convince us that we all hate each other.
	We don't all hate each other.
	And that's the problem. We don't know what's really happening in these elections.
	There's a good chance that Carrie Lake won in a landslide.
	I'm talking by 10 to 20 percent.
	Easy. That...
	Trump devastated Joe Biden.
	Joe 81 million votes Biden.
	And that totally flips the narrative on its head.
	And we're not allowed to have those narratives.
	We're not even allowed to have those conversations that those narratives are possible.
	Because if you start even questioning the mechanisms of the election...
	And talking about those things, you're an election denier, which we're really trying to equate is more racism, in this case anti-Semitism, with, of course, Holocaust denial.
	And even now, you're hearing pundits saying that if you use the term globalist, you're really anti-Semitic and referring to the Jews.
	Oh. Race?
	If you haven't seen, I mean, that's...
	Well, we've been talking about that, Jay.
	Like, it could have Kande said Zionist instead of, or globalist instead of Jews.
	And they said it doesn't make a difference.
	They wouldn't want to after him either way. Steve's been saying that the whole time.
	He says that they're going to make that comparison.
	They're going to draw that line.
	And now you talking about this, it's like, wow, I can see the parallels.
	Yeah, well, I'm just saying I've seen that card forever.
	Like, you can't talk about the Israeli role in 9-11, even though I talk about the Pakistani role, I talk about the U.S. role, the continuity of government role, the Saudi role.
	You talk about that, all of a sudden you hate Jews and you're anti-Semitic.
	And I don't know whether or not you've seen Dave Chappelle's monologue yet for SNL, all 50 years.
	Yeah, disappointed. I actually really loved it.
	I liked the first half of it, but then the whole Russia thing kind of pissed me off.
	I was like, ah, come on, Dave.
	And I get it's comedy, but...
	It's not just that. I think it's beyond just the comedy aspect.
	I think it's the ability to realize that some people still have blind spots and get things wrong.
	I feel like he probably genuinely believes that.
	I don't think he did that to keep the audience.
	And I think, you know, with his overall message of everything should be able to be talked about, I almost like it more that there were definitely parts of that, especially that part, that I didn't agree with, right?
	Yeah. I guess where I want to move from here in the last 10 minutes or so of this is how do we change it?
	How do we finally say, let's get the infrastructure that you and I talked about.
	Cary Lake, very much so, being put into governor, like you said, was going to try to change that infrastructure and bring in more of a system of what we talked about.
	Are there any hopes that in the next 24 months, not even 24 now because this month's halfway over, That we get our verifiable shit together and challenge this corrupt system and turn it into something more democratic.
	You know, I remember one time, like, I think it was like the third or fourth time in show in a row, and I was like, Jay, what do we do, Jay?
	What do we do, Jay? And you're like, I don't know, man, like, but we do have to recognize we have a problem, right?
	And I think that's the most important thing.
	I don't know what we can do to get out of this.
	The only way I see us getting out of this is recognition, recognition from the people.
	And then it takes the second step of people realizing that their neighbor is not their enemy.
	It's going to take that. It's going to take that type of effort, that movement.
	You know, I made a tweet the other day, and I put a hashtag, pitchforks, on it.
	But the truth of the matter is, is that we're still so divided.
	People are still playing team sports.
	The social engineers have gotten the people where they need to be, and that's at each other's throats, rather than looking up at them.
	But, I mean, I don't know what we can do to continue to move the ball forward.
	All I know is what I can do.
	And I tell people to do the same thing, is get more involved.
	Become an advocate, not just an activist.
	An advocate knows more.
	An advocate studies the system, can explain the system, and that's what we need to do.
	And I gotta tell you this much too, Jay.
	Yes, I think it's a pipe dream for a lot of people.
	And the America First movement thinking that they're going to go in there and change the Republican Party from the inside.
	We learned as Democrats from progressives that eventually left the party and left the whole movement and said, you guys have fun with that, that it's not possible.
	You know what I'm saying? But I am impressed with them as a group.
	Patrick Byrne, who you had on the show, I was on a stage with him three weeks ago on the solutions panel.
	And what we're doing out there is just getting the information out there.
	Just keep on yelling from our megaphones to explain the system as is, to try to be understanding, to try to be listening.
	I mean, I still get people all the time like, Pasta, I'm against the fact that you're against the automatic registration and you don't think drop boxes are available.
	And this is why being very patient with those people, talking them through.
	So that's all we can do is continue to become advocates, talk about the system, learn about the system, present solutions, and then hopefully we build a movement where there's enough of us coming forward that we can really change this whole system.
	Because I think the establishment is doing their part.
	I mean, they're giving us such outlandish results.
	Katie Hobbs. Is in outlandish results.
	John Fetterman!
	Come on, John Fetterman?
	Outlandish results. Master Reno, he lost in Pennsylvania.
	He was another election reformist.
	Outlandish results. Mark Fincham, Jim Merchandt losing his Secretary of State to these nobodies or somebody who ruined the elections before.
	Outlandish results. So they're doing their part.
	Let's just do ours.
	The way we fix this is what we're doing right here on Red Voice, right?
	We're talking about it.
	We're educating people.
	And that's the way to move forward is to continue to learn.
	I mean, I tell you, I learned so much from you and my co-host, the things you guys were talking about.
	But it was elections that opened the door for me, that opened my mind to say, wait a second, the ruling class over here, they're going to change and they're going to manipulate and they're going to co-opt our vessel of democracy?
	What won't they do? And that just opened up the door to what they will do.
	You've got to feel vindicated, Jay.
	They're out there talking about chemtrails now.
	You know, Brennan was out there on the thing talking about cloud seeding and chemtrails, and Biden talked about it, and I'm just sitting there going, dude, they called people like Jason Bermas and Mark Dice crazy for years, and now they're admitting to it, and they're going to put money into it.
	And just for a tenth of what we spend in the Ukraine, we could chemtrail out the place like crazy, Jay.
	Well, here's the deal.
	These things are out there, but I call them often whispered history, right?
	But when you start talking about them, you start amplifying that voice or daring to speak about them with a different spin because everything is spun, getting back to like this Bernaysian propaganda and talking points.
	Well, then all of a sudden you have to be smeared.
	You have to be laughed at.
	You have to be labeled. You have to be basically thrown into the arena where you're not an authoritative source.
	You're a conspiracy theorist.
	You're a kook. When that doesn't work, they want to associate you with bigotry.
	And that's been the playbook again and again and again.
	Now they're just using it for more and more and more because they've become more and more corrupt.
	And our elections are a big deal.
	I thought they were compromised for some time now.
	I think they're getting more and more brazen.
	I believe after the COVID-19-84 nightmare, they really fortified the way that that corruption could come into play.
	And if we allow this system to continue...
	In the next two years, there may be no coming back, unfortunately, and no salvaging what used to be a fine constitutional republic with democratic ideals into an authoritarian collectivist society.
	His name is Craig Pasta Giardula!
	He is the co-host of AM Wake Up and the Convo Couch.
	Brother, tell people what you got going and how they can support you because you're up there every morning.
	In fact, you follow my show.
	I'm 8 to 10 a.m.
	Eastern, and you guys start at 10 a.m.
	Eastern, West Coast style, correct?
	Yeah, yeah. We go 10 to 1 on the East Coast, 7 to 10 on the West Coast.
	Following Jason Bermas.
	You know, Jay, you're competing with, what's his name out there on Rockfin?
	The guy with the beard.
	I love him. David Knight.
	The David Knight Show. Oh, am I? Are you David up there early?
	Yeah, you guys are two, like, it's you two, two ex InfoWars people are hot in the morning on Rockfin.
	It's like, pick your InfoWars over here.
	I love it. I love Dave.
	Listen, David Knight, he's got convictions.
	He's got really good information.
	He gives you more of a straight news angle.
	But what I do love about him is that he's stayed away from that left-right paradigm.
	I was not aware that we're head-to-head.
	David Knight knows how to, he talks about the old school globalist, Nixon.
	I love him and stuff. And David Knight and I have a similar contact source when it comes to COVID. And we've been using that source.
	So a lot of times the stuff we talked about when it came to the IHR, the international health regulations and the treaty that was coming out, we were on the same page and he does an amazing job.
	A.M. wake up, 7 a.m.
	to 10 a.m.
	on the West Coast, 10 a.m.
	to 1 p.m. on the East Coast, following Jason Burmey.
	And then I got the Convo Couch Monday, Wednesdays, and Fridays.
	Depending on fee schedule at RT, if you don't know fees on RT, she's been killing it, dude.
	Scott Horton shared a tweet for her the other day.
	She's been breaking some news left and right.
	You can go over to Rumble and catch her on RT. She's sometimes presenting on the news desk or she's doing stories.
	So she's doing that. But we still do the combo couch Monday, Wednesday, and Fridays.
	We try to start around noon.
	Sometimes we start around 1130, depending on schedules, on the West Coast.
	So you can check out the Convo Couch, where we do a lot of election work.
	In fact, today at 1 o'clock on the Convo Couch on Rockfin and Rumble Only, because we can't talk about it
	on YouTube, Jay, I'm going to have Ellen Swenson at 1 o'clock to talk about what's going on in Nevada.
	She works for the EIPCA and the EIP Nevada, which is the Election Integrity Project.
	She's got a lot of data we're going to talk about the battle ballots,
	Nevada's just a shit show.
	And then following her at 2 o'clock, Garland Fabarito will be on to talk about what's
	going down in Georgia.
	Do you know that Hershel Walker lost 200,000 votes in one night, Jay?
	We're going to talk about that too as well.
	So that's today on the Convo Couch between 1 and 3 So you can always check us out over there too as well.
	Well, Pasta, I really do appreciate it.
	I'm glad you came in. Talked about these latest selection results again on the one-week anniversary of the election.
	Who knows what we'll be talking about on the two-week anniversary, Pasta?
	Or maybe the two-month anniversary at some point.
	I wish I was joking, but I'm only half-joking.
	They might still be counting, buddy.
	In a month from that, I mean, literally in the paper today, they said there's still provisionals and other things coming in, so we still might be counting in a month.
	It's absolutely absurd.
	AM, wake up the Convo Couch.
	Craig Pasta-Jardula.
	Thank you very much, sir. Thank you, Jay.
	And that was my interview with Craig Pasta-Jardula.
	I think it was an excellent one.
	I hope that you're going to check out his work, especially when we're talking about not only this election...
	This election, but the 2020 selection, and foreign elections, and yes, even 2016, and how he got into this being a progressive type of guy via being a Bernie bro.
	I think all that's important.
	Here's the part of the broadcast where we leave and we go over to paid only.
	Okay, paid only. If you're loving this stuff, please, redvoicemedia.com slash Jason.
	You get to watch the videos, see the articles that we're discussing, the video clips, etc.
	But you can still listen over at theinfowarrior.podbean.com.
	That's where we run the audio and And basically we're going to drop off from the three platforms in a moment, Rumble, Rockfin, and Twitter, and you'll have to go over to those two platforms to listen or watch the show.
	Please consider supporting the show.
	And then on the flip side of this, we're going to have an interview with Pastor Craig Hagan, which I thought was rather excellent.
	I didn't know what to expect.
	I never really had a long-form interaction with this guy.
	And here's the thing.
	We're not interested in just...
	Speaking to the choir, that's really important.
	We need to be able to reach out to as many people as humanly possible and get different perspectives.
	So, let's start leaving.
	Rockfin, Arrivederci.
	By the way, thank you guys all for supporting me at Rockfin.
	I really do appreciate you.
	Let's see. Rumble.
	Again, another great platform.
	If you're not subscribed on Rumble, why not?
	Why not? Can we get to 20,000 subscribers already?
	We're barely hitting 16.
	So Rumble, another great way to follow and share the work.
	And Twitter? Well, you're still Twitter.
	And I still can't buy a blue checkmark because I still don't have an iOS device.
	And I don't know that buying a blue checkmark is somehow going to make my tweets, I don't know, go up in the algorithm, per se.

▲