All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 5, 2022 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
30:30
Sachs Goes Big On Bloomberg And Musk Plays Politics

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more https://redvoicemedia.net/jason https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952 https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/ https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior https://twitter.com/JasonBermas PayPal [email protected] #BermasBrigade Show less

|

Time Text
Starlink And Putin's Puppet 00:08:30
Hey everybody, Jason Burmes here, and there are a couple stories that we have to go over via the Ukraine-Russian conflict because it's really a proxy war with the United States, and that's how it's being viewed worldwide.
So we have to start owning up to it, okay?
One, there is a video going around with Jeffrey Sachs, who we played an extensive portion of him speaking before the UN and getting a lot of things right probably three to six months ago.
Really impressive.
But that wasn't the only time we featured Sachs.
In fact, on Morning Joe, Jeffree Sachs essentially exposed the CIA involvement over in Syria.
All right.
And that wasn't happening anywhere in the mainstream media.
Very important.
We're actually going to play that clip first.
And then the clip that's going around is like two minutes.
It's jacked off of somebody's television going sideways.
The full eight plus minute interview is awesome.
All right.
There's only one thing I disagree with on the guy, and I'm sure when it comes up, you'll see the same thing.
And then the other story that we need to talk about is that Elon Musk is really a cutout, a caricature, all right?
A PR monstrosity that continues to kind of push this narrative that somehow, first of all, Starlink was meant for peaceful uses.
We did that video.
He tweeted that out.
That's a complete lie.
That's a complete lie, and he knows it via his military-industrial complex contracts.
Now, yesterday, coincidentally, when Tesla's stock, I think, went down 8 plus percent, he puts out this poll, okay?
And we're going to start with this story because it's a little shorter, and at the same time, we have to realize Musk is not a hero, all right?
So Zelensky comes out, and now all of a sudden, they get to play this anti-hero card that he's with Putin, right?
Pushing, again, this narrative that they hate Elon Musk.
Zelensky knows that Starlink is utilized to kill people.
Let me repeat that.
There's nothing peaceful about just Starlink.
And on top of that, the SpaceX program and a lot of these missions have a ride along with the DARPA classified version of Starlink.
All right, not debatable.
So, you know, if we go all the way back here, they make him into a savior.
He's got a master plan to save mankind.
But his wealth during COVID-19 grew 600%, right?
600%.
And the biggest concentration of Starlink is in the Ukraine.
So what we're going to do is we're going to play this news piece where this lets you know that Starlink goes well beyond communication systems.
Now, first of all, let's talk about this.
If it was just communication systems during warfare, those alone are vital.
And I'm talking about being able to call people, you know, establish that kind of thing.
That would be huge.
It goes well beyond that to using tablets to target, all right, Russians and tanks and humans with their drones and their shells.
It's on the video we're about to watch.
It's without a question.
So let's thumbs it up, subscribe, share, strap in for this one.
Remember, we rumbling.
You can buy me a coffee to support the show.
Red Voice Media, we're going to be doing a four-day a week morning live show.
Very pumped up for that.
Without further ado, let's talk about Starlink.
One, zero, ignition, and liftoff.
On July 22nd, SpaceX conducted the Falcon 9 rocket launch.
Its task is to deploy another 53 Starlink internet mini satellites into orbit.
It's just the internet.
That's all.
In Ukraine, the stations have been operating and providing satellite communications for five months already.
Unlimited internet.
Free.
Even Musk's SpaceX, it looks like this.
We pointed at the satellite.
The satellite looks for us.
Voila.
And that's it.
And the connection to Starlink says.
The Ukrainian soldier captured this video at one of the positions of the armed forces of Ukraine in early March.
The first Starlink terminals were activated in Ukraine on February 26th, two days after Russia began its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Ukraine received them for free.
Elon Musk responded to a tweet posted by the Minister of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, Mikhailo Federo.
Let's stop it here, and then we're going to get even more extensive about how they're used in warfare.
During this exchange on Twitter that started yesterday after this poll that again drove all the media away from the stock plummeting, but into this thing and now calling him a puppet of Putin, all this Johnny nonsense, right?
Meanwhile, think about that.
They're calling Musk a Putin a puppet of Putin.
He's sending up warfare devices that are literally killing his military.
Talk about the post-truth world.
All right, let's get that totally untwisted.
All right?
So now they're going to go through again how they link up to drones and beyond.
Asking to provide Starlink to Ukraine urgently.
They help us in our everyday fight on all fronts.
We are ready, even if there is no light, no fixed internet, through generators using Starlink to renew any connection in Ukraine.
Mikhailo Fedorov, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, in an interview with Politico.
Now there are about 14,000 Starlink terminals activated all over Ukraine.
These figures were given by Todd Humphreys, a professor at the University of Texas, who has studied the work of the satellite system in consultations with SpaceX staff.
It's a crystal clear example that secure backup communications is going to be the lifeline of any modern military engagement.
The nimbleness with which Starlink was set up in Ukraine was just astounding.
I mean, it's a total military op.
My God.
Tom Reyes, professor at the University of Texas, in an interview with Politico.
Starlink stations allow communication in combat conditions.
The Ukrainian soldiers use them to adjust artillery strikes, control drones, and plan their actions.
I mean, do they need to repeat themselves?
They're showing you that they're hitting targets.
They're telling you it's calibrating the shell warfare, and they're utilizing the drones with the Starlinks.
How is that peaceful?
We wired 220 votes here, and then we have a starlink thanks to volunteers and personally to Elon Musk.
And we can destroy the enemy even on live streaming.
And in fact, it's a very convenient scene.
A tablet at hand, a map of combat operations, and an online exchange with the command center.
It's a convenient sin.
Thank you, Elon Musk.
If the Russian army is jamming communications in the area of hostilities, and because of this, mobile communications do not work, satellite internet allows the Ukrainian military to communicate with their relatives.
Again, you know, and this is where they humanize it, and I get it, but this is direct warfare in every sense of the world.
Imminent Confrontation with Russia 00:13:48
And we're worried about Twitter and him saying, I've got a peaceful solution.
This is what we need to do.
Puppet of Putin.
He's a puppet of Putin.
Puppet of Putin?
Part of the war machine.
So speaking of that war machine, we're going to go to the Sachs clip first from years and years ago, where he exposes that it's our central intelligence agency that started the conflict in Syria that, by the way, isn't over, guys.
You just never hear about it.
Magically, we don't hear about it.
Magically, we don't have media on the ground during this Russian and Ukrainian conflict at all.
Michael Tracy's reporting some things, guys.
And by the way, when we get to the pipeline bit, maybe some things are being said that only authoritative sources can say.
So I don't want to weigh in on what might have happened with the Nord Stream pipeline.
And we know they sent in the CIA to overthrow Assad.
The CIA and Saudi Arabia together in covert operations tried to overthrow Assad.
It was a disaster.
Eventually it brought in both ISIS as a splinter group to the jihadists that went in.
It also brought in Russia.
So we have been digging deeper and deeper and deeper.
What we should do now is get out and not continue to throw missiles, not have a confrontation with Russia.
Seven years has been a disaster under Obama, continuing under Trump.
This is what I would call the permanent state.
This is the CIA.
This is Pentagon wanting to keep Iran and Russia out of Syria, but no way to do that.
And so we have made a proxy war in Syria.
It's killed 500,000 people, displaced 10 million.
And I'll say predictably so, because I predicted it seven years ago that there was no way to do this and that it would make a complete chaos.
So what I would plead to President Trump is get out.
Like his instinct told him, by the way.
That was his instinct.
But then all the establishment, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Pentagon, everybody said, no, no, that's irresponsible.
But his instinct is right.
Get out.
We've done enough damage seven years.
And now we really risk a confrontation with Russia.
So notice he's talking about, and this is relevant right now, these smaller proxy wars that we've already set up with Russia.
And Trump talked about getting out of Syria several times.
Then you have the chemical attack in Douma that after we saw the WikiLeaks, OPCW documents found out was a complete fraud.
Also, Pearson Sharp of OAN literally went down to Syria, found the location where supposedly this attack had happened.
There was no evidence that attack had happened.
None of the citizens said that attack happened.
The UN writes up this report that omits the information that, again, had to be distributed through WikiLeaks.
That's why we talk about Assange here.
Just want to point that out.
So what Sachs is saying here and continues to say, still very relevant to what he's going to break down in Bloomberg momentarily.
That is extraordinarily dangerous, reckless.
Professor Sachs is correct to say this is a massive humanitarian disaster.
I think the numbers are actually 600,000 dead and 14 million displaced.
So I'm in complete agreement with him on the scale of this, but I would like to see the United States try and be part of the solution.
I don't think it's attractive, but I think we have to understand how this happened.
This happened because of us.
These 600,000 are not just incidental.
We started a war to overthrow a regime.
It was covert.
It was Timber Sycamore.
People can look it up, the CIA operation, together with Saudi Arabia, still shrouded in secrecy, which is part of the problem in our country.
Very big part of the problem.
You know, we go back historically, and I constantly talk about, look, what do we really even know about the better part of the last century?
The classification, especially post-World War II, is total insanity.
When you read Operation Paperclip put out in 2013, and Andy Jacobson tells you there are 600 million documents that are still classified, that seems like a lot.
And he talks about, again, Timber Sycamore and this CIA disruption and really covert program, again, to try to uproot Assad, right, and eventually go in.
Well, we don't know much about it.
A major war effort, shrouded in secrecy, never debated by Congress, never explained to the American people, signed by President Obama, never explained.
And this created chaos.
And so just throwing more missiles in right now is not a response.
My only concern.
We need to go.
It's, by the way, not to walk away, to go to the UN Security Council.
As the Admiral says, to agree with Russia on a strategy for ending the fight.
But ending the fight means that we stop trying to overthrow a government, that we stop trying to support rebels who are committed to overthrowing the government.
That is where this war continues, because we to this day back rebels that are trying to overthrow a government contrary to international law, contrary to the UN Charter, contrary to common sense, contrary to practical path.
We can't do it.
And it's just creating ongoing crisis to the extent of facing an imminent confrontation with Russia.
Imminent confrontation with Russia.
And really, that'll bring us to this Bloomberg clip years later.
I think that's around 2017, 2018, maybe.
2019 the latest, but I think it's 2018.
Inflation.
Church is up 22 this morning.
The heart of Bloomberg surveillance is the quality of our guests always in every case.
And as I spoke to Dr. Yardeni moments ago, we speak now to Jeffrey Sachs to say he's economic professor at Columbia University, barely describes his contribution.
I want to make note that he was 10 years out front on the collapse of American education and the struggle of two Americas.
But, Jeff, I must digress to your take on the war in Ukraine and on the Russia you knew so well under Yeltsin.
You're in the Atlantic this week, and they're equating you with Mearseimer of Chicago as the realists out there.
So let's just stop it.
Just the fact that Sachs is currently being attacked by the Atlantic, where if you saw our earlier broadcast today with Zach Voorhees, we talked about how the Atlantic is painting this false narrative of the dangers of questioning things and really trying to promote and invoke a civil war amongst neighbors.
All right, I just want to point that out.
And now they're going to, again, attack Jeffrey Sachs, the guy who's trying to tell the truth about what?
What's really going on on a global stage and extremely dangerous?
What should be our response to Mr. Putin with your thoughts on war and aggression after the human atrocities that are reported?
Yeah, I was attacked in the Atlantic for being on the side of peace.
And I confess I'm on the side of peace.
I am very worried that we are on a path of escalation to nuclear war, nothing less than that.
We have essentially a war in which Russia feels that this war is at the core of its security interests.
The United States insists that it will do anything to support Ukraine's defeat of Russia.
Russia views this as a proxy war with the United States.
And whatever one thinks about this, this is a path of extraordinarily dangerous escalation.
I mean, again, can you really disagree with it?
I'm going to have one point of contention with the guy through this whole thing, but can you disagree with what he's saying here?
I don't want any type of high-scale nuclear weapon being used by any side anywhere in the world.
I don't think that's too much to ask.
And most people, that was pretty damn well common sense, especially after you had Herman Kahn put out the mad theory or mutually assured destruction theory.
Most people are like, yeah, no, no, that makes sense.
Don't want to destroy humanity.
Weird.
And I am very furious.
You lived this with Yeltsin.
You were there for Gorbachev and Yeltsin and the rest.
I remember when you got off the airplane at JFK, essentially shattered over the collapse of that first experiment.
Do you have a feeling that Mr. Putin is alone?
Is his military in support of him?
A lot of the world is watching the events in horror.
And a lot of the world doesn't like this NATO expansion, which they interpret as at the core of this.
They want to see compromise between the U.S. and Russia in vote after vote in the United Nations.
Basically, it's been the Western countries that have been voting for sanctions and denunciations and other actions, whereas most of the world, certainly most of the world counted by population, is on the sidelines.
They just view this as a horrible clash between Russia and the United States.
They don't.
See, globally on the global stage, even with the people that aren't really paying attention, they get what this really is.
That it's a U.S.-Russia thing.
View this as we describe it in the media as an unprovoked attack by Russia on Ukraine.
That's, you know, anyone in the United States, they'd say, well, what else is it?
But that's because the way that our media have been reporting this.
This conflict goes back a long time.
It didn't start on February 24th, 2022.
In fact, the war itself started in 2014, not in 2022.
And even that had antecedents.
And so most of the world doesn't see it the way we describe it, but most of the world's just terrified right now, frankly, because it's unbelievable to be hearing on one side, well, we'll use nuclear weapons if we need to, and the other side saying, you can't frighten us.
And Professor.
I mean, again, look at them.
SACS is on fire here.
Generally, once more, most people are like, yeah, that sounds insane.
That sounds totally and completely nuts.
We shouldn't be doing that.
All right.
So this is where I think we get to the portion that is kind of going viral right now on the internet.
But again, Sachs has been pure gold throughout this whole interaction.
Mr. Sachs, I share the concern.
And I'll be honest, I spent the weekend also reading articles about the U.S. coming up with counterattacks and proposals of what they would do in response to some of these attacks.
You know, it's definitely a big concern.
It's also an issue as you see this sea change in the economic trajectory in Europe and beyond.
And some of this does come from the energy crisis.
But suddenly we're talking about inflation that we have not seen since World War II, since potentially another time of incredible distress and military intervention.
How close are we to some sort of, I don't want to say hyperinflation, but persistent inflationary impulse well above target in Germany, in the Euro area, as they look to these alternative ways to suppress the peripheral region from getting out of control as they raise rates in the front end?
Well, Europe is in a very, very sharp economic downturn.
The sharp decline of output and living standards also shows up as a rise of prices.
But the main fact is that the European economy is getting hammered by this, by the sudden cutoff of energy.
And now, to make it definitive, the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline, which so let's stop before he gets to the Nord Stream pipeline, because this is where we're going to turn into that.
Think about how quick the standard of living not only went down in Germany, but also over in France.
Go pre-COVID 1984.
Entering Diversion: 60 Years In 00:05:58
All right.
And the yellow jacket movement that a lot of people, one, don't remember because they were never really told about it in the media, or if they were aware of it, have kind of long forgotten.
Kind of long forgotten.
But things haven't gotten better over there.
Remember, a lot of those people, say out in the UK, they don't like the European Union.
All right.
They want it out.
This thing called Brexit.
That never really came to fruition, did it?
And at one point, I thought that, wow, they're going to break up these systems.
This is huge.
This is a global revolution.
Thank God.
But these are mechanisms of this agenda to bring about what?
Global command and control via a carbon social credit begging system.
Bending the knee system.
That's what this is.
And so now Sachs is going to talk a little, you know, not so authoritative source, you know, at least in this country, perspective on the pipeline.
I don't want to make any comments on the pipeline because that may be the next YouTube.
We got to take it down.
Which I would bet was a U.S. action, perhaps U.S. and Poland.
This is Jeff, Jeff, we got to stop there.
That's quite a statement as well.
Why do you feel that that was a U.S. action?
What evidence do you have of that?
Well, first of all, there's direct radar evidence that U.S. helicopters, military helicopters that are normally based in Gdansk were circling over this area.
We also had the threats from the United States earlier in this year that one way or another, we are going to end Nordstream.
We also have a remarkable statement by Secretary Blinken last Friday in a press conference that he says this is also a tremendous opportunity.
It's a strange way to, it's sorry, it's a strange way to talk if you're worried about piracy on international infrastructure.
Let me just stop it.
It is all weird.
Weird to talk that way.
Some might call it gloating.
I don't know.
It's just kind of weird to speak that way.
Vital significance.
So I know this runs counter to our narrative.
You're not allowed to say these things in the West, but the fact of the matter is all over the world, when I talk to people, they think the U.S. did it.
Just to tell you, and by the way, even reporters on our papers that are involved tell me privately.
Yeah, well, of course, but it doesn't show up in our media.
Professor, I don't want to get into tit for tat about what did or did not happen with Nordstream because I don't have the evidence.
And, you know, here I thought it was going to kind of be a diversion and a little bit of a diversion here.
But at least the follow-up question is okay, where she talks about nobody trusting the mainstream media.
How can they when they put out these authoritative cartoon narratives and then have fact checks from the Ministry of Disinformation?
We don't have a counterbalance to this.
There is an issue, though, that's at the heart of what you're saying, which is a lack of trust in the United States, a lack of cohesion in allies in the midst of incredible political as well as economic strife.
I mean, do you see the likelihood of working together at a time when there are such disparate interests and feelings of distrust?
The biggest problem is that we have major geopolitical conflict, not only U.S. and Russia, but also U.S. and China.
So, and again, with a tremendous amount of provocation coming from the U.S. side as well.
So, we're breaking any sense of stability right now.
For the moment, many in Europe are saying, well, the U.S. is our closest ally.
We need to hold on.
But watch what's happening politically.
There's upheaval in Europe, country after country right now.
We're entering a period of enormous instability, and we're unstable in the United States as well.
We went through an insurrection.
We're still not past that.
Let me just stop that.
That would be my disagreement with Mr. Sachs.
We don't think any insurrections happened, but, you know, whatever.
You get one thing wrong.
Here he talks about hyperinflation.
So we're entering the most unstable geopolitical era in many decades.
We're entering the first hyperinflation in more than 40 years, and we're entering the first escalation to the nuclear precipice in 60 years.
60 years exactly this month was the Cuban Missile Crisis.
And this is the most dangerous moment since the Cuban Missile Crisis.
It's an extraordinary overload, and we see no attempt to tamp this down, to quiet it down.
Yeah.
It's almost like there's this kind of planned implosion for this type of great reset that is brought about through a great narrative there, Jeffrey.
Just want to point that out.
I mean, almost seems engineered.
It's weird.
Every day is about escalation.
We're going to defeat the other side.
We have our rights.
We can stand up what we want.
We have Speaker Pelosi flying to Taiwan.
So many provocations in the midst of huge instability.
Jeffrey, we're going to leave it there.
Jeff Sachs, thank you so much.
Engineering Escalation 00:01:46
Greatly, greatly appreciate it.
John, we're getting a fiery response from this interview.
Are you surprised?
No, I'm not.
And you know, this is what we do with surveillance.
There's a different opinion out there.
And I would call it small.
I wouldn't call it small.
This is what we do on surveillance.
I'd call it small, but.
But there's a considered opinion out there internationally along his line.
Again, about the expansion of NATO.
Yeah, and a lot of other things out there.
Folks, I am a documentary filmmaker.
They are all free.
Loose change, final cup, fabled enemies, invisible empire, a new world order to find, and shade the motion picture.
Let's get those thumbs up, subscribe, share.
If you are new to the channel, I want to remind people for only $1, redvoicemedia.net/slash Jason, sign up and you get exclusive content.
That's going to be the second hour of the daily show coming up.
It's going to be Monday through Thursday.
It looks like it's going to be 9 to 11 Central.
So it'll be 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. Eastern Time.
Kind of early for some people, but that's why if you want to directly support me, you can buy me a coffee, help me stay up and about.
We're rumbling.
Make sure to come over to Rumble where everything is uncensored.
You know, sometimes it gets a little too spicy on YouTube.
We have to move over.
Another great way to support me is to hit subscribe on a desktop via Rockfin.
And for $9.99 a month or $99.99 for the year, you can support this broadcast.
And then you get access to everything across the network, which is like a Netflix for creators.
And there's a lot of great content there.
We're looking to grow on YouTube.
And tomorrow, look for me on TimcastIRL.
I love you guys.
Thank you so much for being with me.
Not about left or right.
It is always about right and wrong.
Export Selection