All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 19, 2022 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
01:09:20
Facts Checked Or Narrative Control? Techno Fascism EXPOSED!!!

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more https://redvoicemedia.net/jason https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952 https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/ https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior https://twitter.com/JasonBermas PayPal [email protected] #BermasBrigade Show less

|

Time Text
Cannot Play Certain Videos 00:04:08
Hey everybody, Jason Burmes here and it is time to talk fact checkers.
Now, there was a hearing, I believe it was on the 14th this week, with all the usual players, the Facebook, the Twitter, and even YouTube on their fact checking policy.
Now, the truth of the matter is, it's never been about checking actual facts and always been about narrative control.
And unfortunately, that's why some of the videos we actually can't play on YouTube at all, at all.
All right?
The second part of Ron Johnson's grilling of these people, I can't play on this.
I can't.
I just, I'm not allowed.
There are words I'm not allowed to say here at all.
And my biggest issue with both Holly and really Ron Johnson is they don't really go beyond the specter of conservatives and liberals.
And Holly is always kind of a Chinahawk, right?
I don't necessarily agree with these guys on a lot of their policies, on a lot of their rhetoric.
But unfortunately, this is as good as it gets when we get into the mainstream and showing these people for what they are, liars and hypocrites.
Now, I want you to think about something really quickly.
Can you name a billionaire that's been fact-checked?
Can you name somebody or an organization that wields actual power within the media industrial complex that's been fact-checked?
Hmm?
Anyone?
Like a real fact-check.
Not when they fact-checked the New York Post and said that the Biden laptop is Russian disinformation.
Now, again, they always use semantics and they say that the Intel community, which they are Muppets for, they are Trojan horse civilian systems for, that's not the type of fact-check I'm talking about.
Have they ever checked the facts on behalf of a little guy?
Let me ask you another question.
And good for Ron Johnson.
He asked this question.
If you watch the uncensored part of the broadcast, when we move exclusively to Rockfin and Rumble, you'll hear him.
He asks if the Biden administration or Biden himself has ever been fact-checked.
I'm going to take it a step further.
Has any president other than Trump been fact-checked on anything?
Has George H.W. Bush, and I'm sorry, not H.W. Bush, George W. Bush with his rhetoric been fact-checked?
Has Bill Clinton been fact-checked?
Has Hillary Clinton been fact-checked?
Have any of these people been fact-checked?
No.
And that's because the fact-check is the evolution of the debunk.
The debunk.
Because too many people were sharing relevant information on real subjects.
So what we're going to do without any further ado is we're going to get to Holly and his first round.
Now, each of these guys get two rounds, okay?
Two rounds.
So we're going to play Holly, and then we're going to play Ron Johnson up until the point I can't play him because I'm not allowed to say certain words on YouTube.
Despite the fact that the guy from YouTube says that this is an open forum and there's open debate, that's bullshit.
Okay, that's total Johnny nonsense.
And this Cox fellow from Facebook, he's the worst of the worst.
He laughs in your face at Davos and the World Economic Forum on a panel for the metaverse when they're talking about privacy and how basically you don't have any privacy on these social media platforms.
Facebook's Control Over Narratives 00:03:48
They always give you the same rhetoric that you should be in control of your information.
You're not in control of Jack Squat.
They're in control of everything, of keystrokes, of cookies they put on your computer while you visit other sites.
They are mining you for information in a new digital economy while trying to control the narrative and act like they're telling the truth or fact-checking.
This is the reality.
So thumbs it up, subscribe, and share.
And let's get to Holly's first round.
Thank you, Senator Romney.
Senator Holly, you're recognized for your questions.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Thanks to the witnesses for being here.
Mr. Bullen, let me start with you.
Can you tell me when were you at Facebook?
I was there 2009 through November 2020.
November 2020.
Was it normal in the time that you were at Facebook for executives or team members at Facebook, not even have to be executives, to coordinate closely with the United States government?
I'm not aware of that.
You were never in any such meetings?
No.
You never had any contact with U.S. government employees in your time at Facebook?
Not that I can recall.
Not that I can recall.
Okay, that's semantics for I'm not going to tell you if it happened.
Not that I can recall.
So no matter what you dig up on me, I can just say, well, I didn't recall that.
Hmm.
Seems like a pretty good out.
Would you be surprised to know that on July 16th, 2021, a Facebook employee of Facebook wrote to the Department of Health and Human Services saying, I know our teams met today to better understand the scope of what the White House expects from us on misinformation going forward.
On July 23rd, 2021, Facebook employee thanked HHS for taking the time to meet earlier today.
Wanted to make sure you saw the steps we just took this past week to adjust policies and what we are removing with respect to misinformation.
That included, I'm quoting, increasing the strength of our demotions for COVID and vaccine-related content.
Now, I'm running a risk even playing that, right?
Even though we're not going to give any type of medical advice, make any type of claims on this channel, just talking about saying that word, they give me a strike.
They remove videos.
And they say that they're beholden to the World Health Organization, a mouthpiece for globalism, a mouthpiece for the United Nations, an engine for globalist control.
On April 16th, 2021, Rob Flaherty at the White House circulated a Zoom meeting invitation stating White House staff will be briefed on vaccine disinfo, misinfo, sorry.
On April 7th, 2021, a Facebook employee thanked the CDC for responding to misinformation queries.
We'll get moving now to be able to remove all but that one claim as soon as the announcement and authorization happens.
On July 28th, 2022, that's this year, Facebook employee reached out to CDC about doing a monthly misinfo/slash debunking meeting.
CDC responded, yes, we would love to do that.
On May 11th, 2021, Facebook employees organized a be on the lookout meeting with CDC officials.
On July 20th, 2021, Clark Humphrey at the White House emailed Dave Sumner and others at Facebook asking any way we can get this pulled down and cited an Instagram account within 46 seconds.
Facebook replied, quote, Yep, we are on it, end quote, and down the account went.
Facebook's Role in Content Removal 00:09:35
Is that normal?
Is that normal in your time at Facebook?
Look at that little smirk.
Of course it's normal.
We're an extension of the government.
Of course it's normal.
Facebook?
I don't have experience around that.
So you have no knowledge of anything like this.
Nothing like this ever happened.
And then presto, it started happening just suddenly in 2020 as soon as you left.
I didn't have personal experience of that.
I didn't hear anything.
And you don't know anything about it at all.
You've never heard of anything like this happening ever.
I don't.
We had no idea.
It was our underlings.
I can't recall.
They're allowed to say whatever they want.
All right.
And again, there's not going to be any criminal prosecution for any of these people ever.
Ever.
You know, I was watching somebody earlier today, and I mean, they were some of the worst.
Okay.
I mean, the things they were saying on their channel, and, you know, I'm new to Rumble.
Over there, I got 11,000 people strong.
We're growing over there.
This person has over a quarter million subscribers, and they are grifting.
I mean, they're talking about back-channel intelligence.
They're talking about bullshit of clone Trumps and Jared Kushner's not Jared Kushner and Elon Musk's not Elon Musk and Joe Biden's not Joe Biden.
If you're buying into that, you are being grifted upon.
First of all, I'm not even sure that person's not purposeful disinfo.
They may just be a grifter, but anybody who starts telling you anything like that or they have back channel intel sources, they're full of shit.
Okay, and they get promoted.
They get the thumbs up, okay?
Talk about misinformation.
That's remarkable.
I thought that you were the former vice president of partnerships, product marketing, partner engineering, marketing, strategic operations, and analytics at Facebook.
That's true.
And none of this ever happened.
Why did it start happening, do you think, as soon as you left?
What do you think drove this kind of collaboration where you have Facebook becoming an arm of the United States government, more specifically the White House, to censor private information, personal speech, at the behest of government officials?
So it's hard for me to content on this specific content.
It's hard for me to content.
You see, when you're nervous and you're smirking and you know you're not being truthful, right, but you're not going to get fact-checked, you still screw up your words.
He wanted to say comment, but he says content on content.
Context of the content we're talking about, whether it was public content or whether it was personal content.
I do know that from what I've read and probably the same documents that you have access to, that there were a lot of steps taken around COVID response and COVID misinformation that may have presented a unique scenario and a unique situation where the company took steps to coordinate that way.
Took steps to coordinate, by which you mean to censor the speech of ordinary Americans at the behest of the President of the United States and his administration.
I commend to everyone who's interested these emails, which were discovered as part of litigation led by the state of Missouri and other states as they're suing these tech companies, including your former employer, Mr. Bond, which for the record is one of the worst companies in America.
Listen, again, I may not love Holly on a lot of issues, but damn, I mean, being able to say that to one of these smug bastards, good for him.
Good for him.
They are one of the worst companies in this country.
And they've discovered this trove of information, extensive coordination, extensive between Facebook and the Biden administration, targeting the speech of ordinary Americans.
Let me just say this, too, by the way.
This is a problem with Holly.
It was with the Trump administration as well.
100%.
You know, you give Donnie T a pass on certain things, right?
But you can't give him a pass on not standing up to, you know, the associates around him, Mike Pompeo amongst them.
Mike Pompeo says he's going to launch a presidential campaign for 2024.
Remember when this guy told you Mike Pompeo wasn't your buddy?
Was a guy laughing in your face as the CIA director saying we lied, we cheated, we stole, we had entire courses on it.
Remember this guy who told you Bill Barr wasn't coming to save you with the Russiagate hoax or even the Epstein case?
Yeah, that's reality.
By the way, for standards that are ever shifting, ever shifting, you know, early on, if you questioned if the vaccine had anything to do, I'm sorry, if you questioned that the COVID had anything to do with a lab, you were marked as disinformation.
You were censored, only to have the president of the United States later admit that the possibility that COVID has some lab nexus is in fact a very distinct possibility that our intelligence communities think is actually quite a viable theory.
We've seen the same thing with people who have questions about masks, who have questions about vaccine efficacy.
It's really quite remarkable.
Let me just ask you this.
I got to be honest.
I hope you're catching this live because right after I'm done with this, I'm probably having to take this down from YouTube.
Okay, period.
I don't think I can put this up.
What I might do is go through and literally just censor words because I'm not allowed to even say what Josh Holly's saying.
Okay?
I'm not even going to say whether I agree with him or not because those are the type of policies that banhammer my ass.
What safeguards when you were at Facebook, what safeguards were in place to protect Americans from having their speech censored or having government censors like this access personal information?
So during my time there, the company was, my experience, the company is more reluctant to take down speech and very careful about trying to remove content.
I also don't think the company studied the content on the platform as heavily as you would like.
You don't think that so they didn't do things like they weren't like what they were doing later when they were looking at particular private Instagram accounts and removing them at the behest of the White House.
You're saying that didn't happen while you were there?
That's not a scenario that I ran across.
It's hard for me to comment on a COVID pandemic response, which I think a lot of things are outside of the market.
I'll just say this.
I find it hard to believe, hard to believe, that suddenly Facebook became an entirely different entity and was interfacing with the United States government in an entirely different way only when COVID happened.
I mean, maybe, but I doubt it.
Let me ask you, Mr. Redder, is that how I pronounce your name, by the way?
Redder, that's Redder.
Okay.
Let me ask you this.
You were an engineer at Twitter, is that right?
Correct, yep.
You were the senior vice president for engineering.
Yes.
So yesterday, Mr. Zatko testified to another committee I sit on that 4,000 engineers at Twitter had access to all of the personal information, user data, geolocations of Twitter users.
Is that accurate?
So he, I've never met him, and he joined the company after I left.
So I don't know if that particular claim is accurate.
They never know.
I don't know if that claim's accurate.
I can't recall.
Come on now.
Come on now.
He said all the engineers, you were an engineer.
Did you have access to user data?
When I was there, I don't know if it was all the engineers.
Did you have access to user data?
Well, I was the head of engineering for the whole company.
Did you have access to user data?
I'm looking for a yes or a no.
I'll just remind you.
No.
Even though that's more than likely a direct lie.
So what?
So I work for big tech.
We're a Trojan horse civilian system for the predator class narrative, bro.
We're just up here as a formality.
That's it.
Don't you know nothing's going to happen to us?
You didn't have access to that?
I could have gotten it.
I'm sorry?
I think I could have gotten it.
Okay, well, if you can get it, that's what we call access.
So you did have access to user data.
Is that a yes?
Yeah, I probably could have.
Yeah.
That's probably right.
Yeah, I probably could have.
Okay.
No, no, I probably.
Yeah, maybe I had access to it.
I just ran the engineering department.
I mean, this is just wild.
You did.
Did you ever access any user data?
No.
Were you aware of Twitter engineers ever doxing members of users?
No.
Were you aware of Twitter engineers ever inserting, ever taking over an account and tweeting out or altering the content of that account?
Mr. Zacho said he thought that had happened.
I'm not aware of that.
Lots to unpack there.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
All right.
So listen, we're going to play Ron Johnson in his first round right here, too.
And then we're going to move it over to Rockfin and Rumble exclusively.
Let me repeat that.
We're going to move it to Rockfin and Rumble exclusively.
And when we do that, I'm deleting this off of YouTube.
Because again, even though I'm playing government hearings, let's not forget YouTube pulled government hearings even prior to COVID-19 when it came to whistleblower Erica Caramello-bar.
And that's not obviously not his name.
Summer Riots and Throttle Back 00:11:49
Okay?
And I don't even want to say the real name because again, they'll lock me out.
They were taking videos off from Rand Paul prior to COVID-19.
So what I'm going to do is we're going to play this.
I'm going to delete it on YouTube.
And then I'm probably going to have to go through my editor.
And every time they say the V word, okay, or maybe even the C word or even the P word, we're going to have to edit it out.
I don't like self-censoring.
All right?
And I'll never, ever, ever censor my actual voice.
I'll let you know when there are things I'm not allowed to say.
But they have the monopoly via Google, via Chrome, via YouTube.
Okay?
They have it.
This is a technopoly working against us with narrative control while they laugh at us.
Chairman, again, I think.
Well, that's a little loud, isn't it?
Based on the mooring panel in this panel as well, we're talking about a problem that is my true definition of a problem, one that does not have easy solutions.
Again, what is harmful content is on the eye of the beholder.
You know, we all abhor violence.
I certainly condemn white supremacy.
Condemned immediately, forcefully, repeatedly, the violence on January 6th.
But I am concerned about the bias of your platforms.
The earlier panel would not give me any indication whatsoever.
The percentage of liberals versus conservatives in your organizations, I don't expect you'll be any more forthright in that.
But let me ask you this question.
I know the chairman likes to talk about the white supremacist in January 6th.
Democrats love talking about that.
What about the 570-plus riots that occurred in the summer of 2020?
2,000 law enforcement officers injured, $1 to $2 billion worth of property damage, a couple people killed in Kenosha, Wisconsin, dozens of buildings burned.
A couple dozen people also lost their lives during those riots.
Mr. Cox, have you deplatformed?
Have you throttled back or censored anybody that was involved in the organization of the summer riots?
Senator, these are a quick answer.
I got a lot of territory to cover.
Senator, domestic terrorism and extremism and calls for violence are against our community.
Did you throttle back?
Did you censor anybody that organized the summer riots?
570 of them.
Senator, I can look at the specifications.
Mr. Mohan, did YouTube throttle back or censor any of the rioters in the summer 2020?
Senator, our policies apply equally regardless of who the so did you throttle back?
Did you censor some of the organizations that were responsible for the summer riots?
We would have applied our policies equally regardless of where the riots were, if it was a violation of the.
Can you provide me with the names of the people you throttled back who are responsible for the summer riots?
Senator, I'm happy to follow up.
Okay, good.
I appreciate that.
Mr. Sullivan, what about Twitter?
Twitter would have removed any incitement to violence that was on our platform, regardless of.
So you did.
You did throttle back on organizers of the summer riots, for you see the little twitch in his face.
We're gonna bring it back.
Watch, watch the right hand side of this guy's face okay um yeah, that would be the right side.
I'd be turned around right.
Maybe it would be the left whatever, i'm not right all the time.
I make mistakes too.
Watch the twitch in this guy's face when he gets asked this question of.
Um, so you did.
You did throttle back on organizers of the Summer Riots.
Look at Twitchy!
You think Twitchy is going to be honest here?
Give me a break, for any case where we see incitement to violence, we would remove that content.
And so your, your ceo, mr Dorsey, was before a Commerce committee, I think in it was in october 2020, and both senator Cruz and I asked him whether your platform Twitter, could impact our elections and he denied it.
Our, our three witnesses earlier the morning this morning completely disagree with mr Dorsey, said they absolutely twitter, and you know these platforms Can do.
You believe that Twitter can influence?
impact our elections?
I think Twitter plays an important role in the public conversation.
It's really kind of a yes or no answer.
Can they impact our elections?
We're taking the elections really.
Look at them look around, man.
None of these want to say yes or no.
They're easy questions.
Listen, even if Twitter wasn't the social media force, it is the way the media covers Twitter as some kind of an authoritative Lord source, okay, of course it impacts everything socially, and they damn well know it.
And that's why people like me are shadow banned.
That's why conversations on certain topics are not allowed or demoted.
That's why certain things are promoted.
That's why there's all these bots out there promoting insanity constantly on that platform.
Come on.
Yes or no?
I got a lot of comments.
As I described to the previous question, we've put in place many actions and mitigations relating to elections.
Can you impact the elections?
People try to use our platform to get messages out regarding elections, and we are investing in the US.
You know, this morning I specifically talked about the fact that you censored the New York Post article about Hunter Biden.
We have polls that said that had the American public known that, you know, we wouldn't be in the ditch that we are right now.
Mr. Mohan, do you believe YouTube can impact the elections?
Senator, there's an open public debate that happens.
Open public debate, my ass.
That is an outright lie.
There's no open public debate.
Get out of here with that.
There's a constrained narrative that you're allowed to go by and not go beyond certain types of questions or comments, period.
trojan horse civilian systems comes on youtube every day whether it's can you I mean, just it's really a pretty simple yes or no answer.
Senator, YouTube is an open platform where there is debate.
And Mr. Cox, do you believe that Facebook can impact the elections?
Senator, I think the public discussion that happens on our platforms are a part of the public.
You don't think by censoring material that you, specifically your management, can impact elections?
Not what's occurring on your platform, but your management, your decisions, your censoring of information.
Can you impact elections?
Senator, respectfully, with respect to the New York Post story you referenced, we did not.
I know you throttled it back, but I mean, can you, again, I'm not asking about that specifically?
Can you, do you have the power?
You know, our earlier witness.
All right, listen.
I'm going to stop Ron Johnson here.
I'm going to show you what a weasel face this Cox character is when he discusses internet privacy.
Okay?
Just watch this guy.
All right.
And then what we're going to do is we're going to move it over to Rockvin and Rumble, and I'm going to delete this video from YouTube because it's just too spicy.
Not too spicy because of what I said, because of what elected officials asked of big tech.
That should let you know everything you need to about censorship.
And yeah, I'm going to spend the time going through the 25 minutes or so of this video, probably be 30 by the time we're done, and getting rid of those words so I can repost it.
Is there a way to do it where the user owns their own data?
I mean, one of the sort of benefits of Web3, some of the blockchain things that we've talked about that may exist in terms of layering on top.
Well, did we freeze up?
There we go.
There's this idea that maybe you could own your own data and even maybe sell it to maybe a meta or to other.
How do you see that?
So first, the user should control their data.
All lies.
Again, a talking point.
That's the same Zuckerberg talking point.
You don't control shit.
That's nonsense.
It's a track, trace, database society out of control.
All right.
And they're moving into the internet of bodies.
That's what this whole metaverse thing is about.
So, any sort of combination of events, the user should have the ability to delete, to understand, and to have controls over how their data is used.
The user should understand that having data aggregated means they can have a much more relevant service.
I mean, the exchange of you can have ads that are relevant to you or ones that are generally irrelevant to you is an exchange that comes along with basically agreeing to have data collected in a privacy-safe and aggregated way.
A privacy-safe way, bullshit.
Right.
So, but we all, and I'm here in Europe with all of you now, and we all just click on the accept, accept, accept the cookie.
And even though we now have more, we now have to do that.
Now he's smiling.
Here, here, let's zoom in on that.
We don't all do that.
I don't do that.
I know better.
Look at this little smile, a little smirky smirk.
Let's bring it back.
We're going to bring it back 10 seconds.
Let's bring it back.
Okay.
Watch his little smirky smirk.
An aggregated way.
But we all, and I'm here in Europe with all of you now, and we all just click on the accept, accept, accept the cookie.
And even though we now have more.
We now have more control.
It's hilarious to these people.
So listen, we got a whole nother round by Mr. Johnson.
We got a whole nother round by Howie.
And by the way, Johnson's next round is way, way more powerful.
I mean, there's a reason I don't even intend to do that live on YouTube at all.
And again, we're going to delete this video on YouTube.
So look, you want to come join us?
You can do so.
We're on Rumble.
We're on Rockfin.
We're 100% uncensored on those two platforms.
I do want to remind you, I can't do this without you.
Consider buying me a coffee, $5, $10, $15.
It means the world to me.
It really does.
I want to thank some of the donors today.
Anietta and Craig, thank you so much.
We really do appreciate that.
Here's the deal.
I'm a documentary filmmaker.
Watch the documentaries, share the documentaries.
You're going to watch me in real time and the broadcast and delete the video before we even go.
Okay?
So let's do that now.
I'm sorry, YouTube.
Come over to uncensored and then we can continue with that.
So YouTube, Arriva frickin' dirtie.
So we have ended the broadcast on YouTube.
In a moment, as you see me repeat myself, the stream will end.
You're gonna watch me delete it because I have to, because I really don't have a choice here, guys.
They're the arbiters of truth, right?
They set the rules.
It doesn't matter if what I say is 100% truthful.
I've got all the evidence in the world to back it up.
None of that matters to these people at all.
So end stream.
Endy McGee.
Okay, we're done.
Great.
Then we're going to go to the studio right now.
Arbiters of Truth 00:07:52
I want to see, make sure everybody knows I'm not bluffing.
We're going to go to content.
All right.
We're going to go to live.
And because we don't want to get thrown off the platform again, okay, what are we going to do?
We are going to delete forever.
I understand.
We're permanently deleting it.
Delete forever.
And it's gone.
So let's continue.
Now we're uncensored.
Now we get to talk a little harder.
Okay.
So let's let Ron Johnson finish up.
Then we're going to go to Holly and then back to Johnson again in this hearing.
Mr. Reder said, a small group of people run these companies and have substantial power over shaping the reality for billions of people.
Damn right.
I mean, can you just be honest?
By the way, our earlier panel basically, to prepare for I said, don't believe a word you guys are going to tell us.
But can you at least be honest with the American public and say, yeah, you have that power.
You can impact the elections.
Can you be honest with them, or are you going to sit there and say, well, you know, people talk about things on our platforms.
Senator, we do think transparency about our decision-making around our content, around not just terrorism, but around misinformation.
We take all.
Terrorism.
They keep going back to terrorism because they want to make you a domestic terrorist.
They don't give a rat's ass about terrorism.
It's a joke.
It's the color-coded terror system joke.
Look, I never harp on the borders, man.
Because look, the vast majority of those people coming across, they just want a better life.
But they're always talking about back in the day, terrorists coming across our borders, terror, terror, terror, radical extremists.
It's all bullshit.
It's all bullshit.
And they knew it.
They knew it then, and they know it now.
And that word is directed at you.
You best damn well believe it.
All of these areas of content seriously, and we publish our work.
We do think the public deserves to know what our policies are and how we enforce them.
We are going to have another round, it sounds like.
So I've got a lot more ground to cover.
But let me just start.
I think Senator Hawley did a great job of talking about how federal health agencies were in direct communication with, in particular, I think it was Facebook, possibly Twitter.
We've also heard that, of course, Mr. Zuckerberg was, or your Facebook was contacted by the FBI as it relates to Russian disinformation.
And we covered that in the morning.
When it comes to how miserably we failed handling COVID, I think one of the problems was the lack of robust information using this marvelous device we call the internet.
I mean, doctors could have been testing out different theories of the case, sharing that experience, but they were shut down.
They were censored.
I want to ask each one of you, I'm 67 years old.
As long as I've been alive, it's always been, I've always been told if you have a serious medical condition, you really ought to seek a second opinion because nobody has perfect information.
I wish, I wish that there would have been some modesty exhibited by our federal health authorities.
Quite honestly, your platforms in acknowledging the fact that we don't have perfect information and maybe we ought to let some information flourish.
I mean, people were censored, eminently qualified doctors who had the courage and compassion to treat COVID patients with cheap, generic, widely available drugs.
No, no, actually try to save lives.
And these people have blood on their hands.
They literally enabled mass murder.
And they still endorse mass murder.
That's who these people are.
They're social climbing vampires that will do whatever it takes to gain power amongst the predator class, which they kneel before and lick the boots of.
That's all these people are.
So I just want to ask a question.
Mr. Cox, do you believe that people ought to get a second opinion when it comes to complex medical conditions?
Senator, we absolutely believe that building a product where people have the ability to express their point of view is critical to what we do.
Didn't answer the question there.
It's critical to what people expect from the product.
You guys like not analyzing people.
Can you just answer a short question?
Mr. Mohan, do you believe you ought to get a second opinion when it comes to complex medical conditions?
Senator, as we all recall, when the pandemic started, it was an unprecedented event in history where science was being created.
So maybe you ought to seek a second opinion.
I mean, do you think it's a good idea to get a second opinion?
Or do you only go to one authority?
And put all your faith in one authority.
No other opinion is going to be valid.
Is that your belief?
Senator, we work with a wide variety of health authorities.
Bullshit, you did.
You worked with the authoritarian globalists who censored any type of information that was outside of the Faucian language of there are no treatments for this.
Budesonide doesn't work.
Hydroxychloroquine doesn't work.
Ivermectin doesn't work.
You're not allowed those drugs.
Okay?
That's what you did.
And then you pushed a hate and lie shot produced by the Defense Department, DARPA, with Moderna and its partners.
You lying piece of human trash.
You minion.
You Muppet.
In this country and all over the world.
Mr. Sullivan, do you believe you ought to go get a second opinion?
If you get diagnosed with cancer today, are you going to rely on just one authority?
As a patient, that sounds like common sense.
Our code is a lot of people.
Weren't we 330 million patients here?
Look at his little smirks, man.
At least that guy, you know, again, he's probably the most uncomfortable one up there lying, right?
You can tell with the twitch in his face and everything else.
At least he was there.
That seems common sense.
No shit, it seems common sense.
Common sense was thrown out the windy.
We weren't allowed a second opinion, were we?
We weren't allowed by your platforms for that second opinion.
I think hundreds of thousands of people lost their lives because you did not allow a second opinion.
Millions, millions of people globally lost their lives, Ron.
That's the only thing I can say about Ron Johnson on this one.
Millions.
But thank God for Ron Johnson, man.
He's been one of the only voices standing up to the COVID-19 44 nightmare, period.
Period.
Second opinion to be published on your platforms.
Our COVID misinformation policy only was highly flawed, and I'll point that out in the second round of questioning.
Thank you.
If I officially say, it only looked at information that was demonstrably.
Did you see that nervous tick?
We're going to bring it back.
He's going to say it was only demonstrably false.
He knew what a big lie he was about to tell, and he had the same Twitch.
Watch him again.
Only looked at information that was demonstrab.
It's all in the face, baby.
Take a look at this guy.
He knows he's lying to you.
Demonstrably and widely believed to be.
And I need a second round.
If that's true, by the way, why did you lose the case against Alex Berenson?
Huh?
If that's true, why'd you lose the case against Larry?
Why just settle with him?
Hundreds of Employees, Communist Party Members? 00:15:49
Hmm?
Why?
I mean, wow.
Wow.
We are in, a lot of people want to say clown world.
We're in a cartoon.
I've been saying we live in a cartoon for well over a decade.
Round of questions, can I can point that out that it was not demonstrably false?
Damn right.
Damn right.
And he's going to in the second round of questions.
That's why we're going to go to him in a moment.
But first, we're going to go back to Holly.
I got the time code right here.
Before we get there, and there is right here.
Okay, when we go to Holly, I do have some Tipskis and Hutch over at The Rockfin.
Thank you so much, MJ Nichols.
We appreciate it.
That's how you support the broadcast.
If you're watching on Rockfin for the first time, consider hitting that subscribe button on a desktop, $9.99 a month or $99.99 for the year.
Again, help support the broadcast.
Let's go.
Being here.
Ms. Pappas, let me start with you.
I have to say it's great to see you here today.
I have repeatedly invited your company to testify before Congress.
I invited them to testify to the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism in November of 2019.
I invited them to testify again in September of the following year.
Both times we were stiffed.
TikTok told me that they would set up a meeting with the CEO.
They didn't want to testify in public, but they set up a meeting with the CEO after November 2019.
They then canceled that meeting.
So it's nice to see TikTok being willing to answer questions in public.
It's a pleasant change.
Let's dig into a few things if we could.
Specifically about TikTok's links to the Chinese Communist Party.
In response to a letter from some of my colleagues, TikTok claimed earlier this year that the company has never shared data, never, with the Chinese government.
Is that correct?
That is correct, yes.
And has never shared data with the Chinese Communist Party.
Is that correct?
We will never share data, period.
My question was in the past tense.
Has TikTok ever shared data with the Chinese Party?
Look at that face.
Look at how uncomfortable she is.
And again, CCP, Communist Chinese Party, they're just the model.
We're well beyond the nation state, guys.
Hate to tell you.
They're the model for societal control.
Okay, they're the command and control that these authoritarians want globally.
So they can shut things down whenever they want, put you on a social credit score, tell you how to live, what you can eat, how many cars you can drive, if at all, where you can travel to.
They're the mod doll.
All right?
They're just another Trojan horse civilian system this time for the globalism.
All right?
The real, real controllers, period.
Chinese Communist Party.
We have never shared data with the Chinese government, correct?
With the Chinese Communist Party.
Yes, correct.
Do you have any?
Have you ever shared it with members, to members of the Chinese Communist Party?
We have said many times, Senator, that we do have Chinese engineers based in China.
I don't think there's any platform up here that would be able to speak to what you're talking about as it relates to the political affiliation of an individual.
That's total bullshit, by the way.
Of course they can speak to that.
Telegraph, thank you so much for that $100 tip over at The Rock Fin.
It helps so much.
He says, you the man, Burmese.
I love your dedication.
Your hard work is greatly appreciated.
I couldn't do it without people like you supporting me.
Thank you.
But I'm happy to assure you that we are ensuring the access controls around our data as well as the storage of that data in the United States.
So I think you're telling me that there are TikTok employees or ByteDance employees who are members of the Chinese Communist Party.
Is that to what I mean?
No, I'm saying I wouldn't be able to verify that.
Well, let me just ask you that affirmatively.
Are there members of, are there TikTok employees or ByteDance employees who are members of the Chinese Communist Party?
Senator, I'm saying nobody that's sitting on this panel could tell you a political opinion.
I'm not interested in anybody's opinion.
I'm asking you a factual question.
Are there members of the Chinese Communist Party employed by TikTok and ByteDance?
Yes or no?
Of course though.
I wouldn't be able to tell you the political affiliation of any individual.
What I can tell you is how much we're missing.
I know membership in the Communist Chinese Party is not exactly like membership in the Democrat Party.
So I'm looking for an answer.
You tell me you don't know?
TikTok doesn't know.
Here's what I can tell you.
You can never get a yes or no out of these people.
They've got their lines.
They've got their talking points.
They've been coached again and again and again, or they wouldn't be sitting there.
I mean, you saw the dude from Twitter.
He knew what he could and couldn't say, and his face was twitching all over the place.
Insanity.
I can tell you that our U.S. and Singapore leadership, there are no CCP members.
I can tell you.
So you do know that, but you're telling me that you don't know if there are any members who are employed by TikTok or ByteDance, members of the Chinese Communist Party?
Senator, I am happy to share that we are putting access to the United States.
That's not my question.
They're always happy to share the bullshit that spews out of their mouth that has nothing to do with the question.
That's not my question.
My question is: are there any TikTok employees or ByteDance members, employees, members of the Chinese Communist Party?
Yes or no?
Senator, I'm saying nobody could sit up here and give you the.
So you don't know?
You're saying you don't know.
You do know your leadership isn't, but you don't know about your employees.
Is that your testimony?
I know that everyone who makes a strategic decision at this platform is not a member of the CCP.
Correct.
A strategic decision.
Okay.
It's interesting.
It's interesting to me that you're quite confident that anyone who can make a strategic decision, how many people is that?
It's our leadership team.
And again, the leadership team is based in the U.S. and Singapore.
Our CEO is based in Singapore.
He's not Chinese.
Happy to go into the efforts that we're going to be.
Would it surprise you to learn that Forbes magazine recently reported that at least 300 current TikTok or ByteDance employees were members of Chinese state media and affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party?
Again, we don't look at the political affiliation, so I can't speak to individuals, but what I can tell you is we're protecting the data in the United States.
Well, apparently, though, you do look at political affiliation because you're quite willing to sit here and tell me that no one who has strategic input or makes strategic decisions is a member of the Chinese Communist Party.
So you do know very well, as a matter of fact.
You just don't want to answer my other question.
We have thousands of people that work at the company, so I'm not going to vouch on the political affiliation of any particular individual.
He didn't ask you about individuals at all.
He asked you a reality question.
And these people are about creating their own reality.
That's why we do reality rants with Jason Burmes, because we talk about the real deal.
We'll go beyond the Chinese Communist Party.
But this is how deceptive they are.
I mean, the layers, it's like an onion, baby.
You keep going and going and going.
Another tip.
Thank you so much, Costello.
We really do appreciate the continued support of the broadcast.
Have you seen the videos of Chinese Communist Party members conducting training for TikTok and ByteDance employees in China?
That's fake?
I do not know what you're referring to, but what I can tell you is any decision.
Has that happened?
Sir, I just said that I wouldn't be able to tell you.
I haven't seen it.
I'm not sure what you're referring to, but I'm happy to follow up.
Wait, wait, I'm sorry.
Let's go back.
Let's see if we can cut through the mumbo jumbo.
I'm asking you if the Chinese Communist Party has conducted training sessions ever for employees of Byte Dance or TikTok.
Yes or no?
Not for TikTok.
TikTok the app.
No, not for TikTok.
TikTok the eye.
They're always talking about how all the privacy, everybody's data is safe.
He hasn't asked that question one time.
One time.
Telegraph, thank you so much.
He says, you're welcome, brother.
Here's another round to start the week off strong.
That's why I love the Burmese Brigade.
Thank you, man.
Thank you.
Or woman, I don't know.
Telegraph.
Whatever you are.
However you identify.
But I got a funny feeling that my audience doesn't identify as a purple-haired unicorn being rode by a leprechaun over a rainbow into a pot of imagination land gold.
I would assume the vast majority of my audience either identifies as a man or a woman based on their biological sex.
Just me.
Just a wild thought from Jason Burmes while we watch this.
And remember, Ron Johnson coming up after this, Ron Johnson's second round, even more powerful.
Does not operate in China.
We are somewhere in the United States.
You have employees in China.
ByteDance has employees in China.
Listen, we've been through this song advance, so let's just skip that.
I've heard it all before.
I appreciate that.
Answer my question.
Yes or no.
Have they conducted training for ByteDance employees or TikTok employees?
I can speak on behalf of TikTok, and the answer is no.
No, that's interesting.
Do any TikTok employees based in China have access to U.S. user data?
As we have publicly said, yes, we have engineers in China.
But none of them are members of the Chinese Communist Party.
We are working on the access controls to minimize that control.
I've heard that.
I frankly don't believe it.
In the United States, and through the CIFIA.
Wait, wait, wait.
So your testimony is that you do have TikTok employees based in China who do have access to U.S. user data, but you're confident that none of them are members of the Chinese Communist Party and ever accessed it?
Is that your testimony?
Who has access to U.S. user data has and does so to perform daily duties?
So if it is for the performance of site management, bug handling, but we have strict controls in terms of who and how our data is accessed.
And none of that's accessible to any member of the Chinese Communist Party.
Is that your testimony?
We believe we have the strictest controls.
That's not my question.
That's not my question.
My question is: does anyone who have access to user data, are they members of the Chinese Communist Party?
I feel like I've answered your question.
You haven't, and I feel like you're avoiding it at every opportunity.
Of course.
Of course.
She knows she's avoiding every question.
I mean, all these people are.
They've got their talking points.
This is authoritarianism.
This is narrative control.
This is the great reset meets the great narrative, Klaus Schwab style, the nut Schwab himself, which is all just repackaged new world order trash.
That's all it is.
So let me give you another one.
Since you're on the record and under oath.
I would welcome you being clear.
Do any person who has access to U.S. user data, are they members of the Chinese Communist Party?
Yes or no?
Let me be clear again.
Yes or no?
For our U.S. users, the data is stored and housed in the United States.
We have access controls.
You're not answering my point.
Let the record reflect you will not answer my question.
Why not?
Any of that data, it's overseen by our U.S.-led security team.
That's not my question.
That's not my question.
My question is: does any employee who has access to U.S. user data, are they members of the Chinese Communist Party?
You want to be able to do that.
And again, as a global technology platform, there is no other company that could make that assertion either.
That sounds like a yes to me.
No other company.
I mean, that's the closest you're going to get to a yes.
It does sound like a yes because it is a yes.
All right.
It's an obvious yes.
And the banter back and forth of almost eight plus minutes shows you that these people are deceptive, again, social climbing, boot-licking minions of a predator class, hell-bent on the idea of social Darwinism, that they are better than you, and you are a serf or a slave at best.
And you will beg them.
You will kneel before them if you want to utilize their technology.
I think that's news.
You're familiar, I know, with this BuzzFeed article that says that more than, according to leaked audio from more than 80 internal TikTok meetings, China-based employees of ByteDance have repeatedly, repeatedly accessed non-public data about U.S. TikTok users.
Everything is seen in China, said a member of TikTok's Trust and Safety Department in a September 2021 meeting.
In another September meeting, a director referred to one Beijing-based engineer as a master admin who has access to everything.
These reports show data was accessed far more frequently and recently than previously reported.
And your testimony is that this is false?
Correct.
Oh!
Oh, it's false.
The tapes they have are false.
It doesn't exist.
It's not real.
These aren't the droids you're looking for.
This is false.
That is correct.
So there are.
Everything that you just stated, there is no such thing as a monster account at the time.
Someone is referred to as a master admin.
But you're telling me that China-based employees...
A monster account.
She didn't even hear the word right.
And that's not true.
Probably heard the word right, but again, just like the last guy, they're not used to actually being grilled.
They're used to being groveled to by other employees that just want to keep their job or social climb like they did.
So they stutter a bit.
They get a few things wrong here and there.
Have never accessed non-public data of U.S. TikTok users.
No, we've already said on the record that we have Chinese employees who have access data.
Well, that's what this is saying.
So you agree?
If you want to clarify on each individual statement, I'm saying that there is strict access controls around the data that is accessed in the United States that is overseen by our U.S.-led security team.
We are working with Oracle.
That's not what this article says.
We disagree with the categorization in that article wholeheartedly.
Characterization.
Oh.
Oh, the character is, again, semantics, and it's just language control.
That's it.
Here's the point.
I know there are the senators who want to ask questions.
I think we're going to have a second round.
The truth appears to be, besides the fact that we can't get a straight answer on any of these questions, is that you have hundreds of employees with appears access to U.S. user data that may very well be members of the Chinese Communist Party.
You have no way to assure me that they don't have access to our own, to our citizens' data.
And you won't answer my question in a straightforward way about whether a CCP member has ever gained access or not.
I think, from my own point of view, that's a huge security problem.
Senator, if I may, we are one of the most highly scrutinized platforms.
There have been many cybersecurity experts who have researched our platforms, including Citizen Lab, which is a leading academic research unit based in the University of Toronto.
are an authoritative source of academia they have looked into this blah blah blah blah blah who have said and i am happy to submit this for the record for the i bet you are i bet you are Because they're groveling bootlickers just like you.
Blow the Whistle on Security 00:02:03
Committee, that our research shows that there is no overt data transmission to the Chinese government by TikTok.
TikTok's features and codes do not pose a threat to national security.
Wait, wait a minute.
Overt data transmission?
Ms. Papas, this isn't a hearing for you to testify at Will.
You're here to answer questions.
I'm providing you with information.
No, you're not.
You're talking over me, and you're submitting the information from who knows who funds this entity?
Who knows who's behind it?
Who knows what it contains?
I don't know.
What I do know is you won't give me straight answers to my questions.
And the reason, I think, is pretty clear, because your company has a lot to hide.
You're a walking security nightmare.
And for every American who uses this app, I'm concerned.
Look at that face, man.
Can you imagine what that person's personal life is?
What you're looking at is like a multi-millionaire that's supposed to have everything, right?
He's wearing the power pants suit.
Look at that face.
That's an unhappy person.
All right.
That's somebody that has bent the knee to evil and said, I will serve you throughout my life.
Telling you right now, repent.
And I'm not talking religious-wise.
I'm talking about repent to humanity.
Give up your job.
Take what you've got.
Say I'm sorry.
And really blow the whistle.
Blow the whistle on how bad all of this is.
Every one of these platforms.
But then if Vanessa Papas or Pappas or whatever were to do that, she'd be fact-checked.
She'd be canceled.
She'd be banned on social media.
That's reality.
So now we're going to get to my man, Ron Johnson, again.
And in this one, again, he's nailing it.
This is way, way, way farther than most can go.
Let's do it.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Blow the Whistle on Censorship 00:11:22
Thank you all.
Thank you, regular member apartment.
Senator Johnson, you're recognized for the question.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Cox, just a quick little housekeeping here.
Are you aware of a letter Senator Grassley and I sent to Mr. Zuckerberg on August 29th?
We did get a reply on September 12th from Mr. Kevin Martin just saying they're going to respond.
Are you aware of that letter asking for information, contact between yourself, FBI, Department of Justice, documents, names, that type of thing?
Senator, yes, I am aware of that letter and I know the team is working on following up as quickly as they can.
And you'll commit to full response on that?
I know the team is committed to a response, yes.
Okay.
Let's put up my first chart here.
Back in November of 2021, CDC Director Rochelle Walinski stated in front of the help committee, we have the most robust, safe vaccine safety system we've ever had in this country.
In October of 2020, before the vaccine was approved, CDC's Dr. Tom Shimabukuru stated in a web seminar, said that VAYERS, that's, you know, veyers, obviously, something that Ms. Lewinsky was talking about.
VAYERS traditionally has provided the initial data on the safety profile of new vaccines when they are introduced.
For COVID, vaccine reports will be processed within one to five days.
Depending on the seriousness of the report, CDC and FDA received updated data sets daily, and data mining runs are planned to be conducted every one to two weeks.
So this is an example of the timeliness and responsiveness of VAYERS going back to H1N1.
So it kind of sounds like they're going to really rely on VAYERS, right?
I remember part of that discussion, they were going to say, listen, we're going to take vaccine safety so seriously.
If we get a report of a couple days of lost time because of an injury, we're going to be calling that individual up and we're going to be checking on it.
So it really sounded like they had this all covered, right?
Let's see what they actually did.
I produced this chart because I took VAYERS and FAYERS seriously, and I started tracking this.
And I started putting together this chart.
I want to quick describe what this is.
The first five lines, the first five drugs, four of them are in the Fayer system, the FDA adverse event safety system.
Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, dexamethasone, and Tylenol.
You got the flu vaccines in there that comes off the VAYER system.
You have remdesivir, which comes off of FAYERS, and COVID vaccine that comes off of the VAER system.
Now, I can see why the government really didn't like the way I put their data.
This is their data.
Their data.
I mean, he's nailing it here.
He's nailing it.
Well, what do they say?
Oh, VARES isn't reliable.
Oh, anybody can report to VARES.
That was the effort in their great narrative.
Make no mistake about it.
I didn't make these numbers up.
This is off the FAIRS and the VARES system.
But for whatever reason, Twitter censored this chart.
Now, just quick, and I'll show you the current version, but the one you censored, it showed that ivermectin on average over 26 years, on average, had 15 deaths reported on the FAIR system.
Hydroxychloroquine had 69 deaths.
Flu vaccines had 77.
Dexamethasone had 618.
Tylene had over 1,000.
Remdesivir, since it was approved, had 1,612, and the vaccines had 21,000.
Look how upset the chair is right there.
Look at him with his arms crossed.
He's pissed.
They're pissed.
These are enemies of humanity, 100%.
1,000 deaths.
Okay, I mean, these are just the facts.
Look, look, look at him.
Look at him.
He's like, I can't believe they're saying this.
I can't believe he's allowed to have a chart.
Look at our minion in the back with his mask on two and a half years later.
I mean, these people are sick.
Censored it.
Do you have any idea why?
Senator, I wasn't at the company at the time, but what I can tell you is that there it is again.
There's his little twitch.
There's a little facial twitch.
I wasn't at the company at the time.
Everybody's got the nice little plausible deniability.
We want robust discussion on the platform of any issue.
A COVID misinformation policy was developed that seemed to me, and again, I don't develop it, but it seemed quite narrow to me.
It seemed about you censored government information.
Here's the current numbers, by the way.
Over 30,000 deaths reported worldwide.
27% of those, by the way, have occurred on day zero, one, or two.
You didn't only censor this chart, you censored, for example, rotary shows that interviewed me talking about FDA CDC data.
YouTube took down a video of this committee's hearing of an Emily qualified critical care specialist who'd saved thousands of lives treating people using what seems to me pretty safe drive drugs, okay?
After 8 million views.
Look at that guy, another minion.
They all have a grimace on their face.
Hey, is your sports car and your big house and your mistresses worth it?
Hmm?
Hmm?
Is it?
Look, again, I don't know what happens after this world, but I'll tell you what.
Humanity, we have a spirit, a soul.
All right?
There is good and evil.
And I can only hope that somewhere these people are going to suffer beyond the earthly realm and pay for their sins against humanity, period.
And again, that's not biblical to me, but they are lying.
They have the blood on their hands.
Make no mistake.
YouTube pulled that video down.
What would be the justification for YouTube pulling down a hearing of the United States Senate with a highly qualified doctor just giving a second opinion on how to save lives during COVID?
Why would YouTube do that?
On what authority, whose authority are you censoring that information so the American public could not receive a second opinion and access drugs that might have saved their lives?
Why would YouTube do that?
Senator, respectfully, as I was mentioning earlier, we didn't decide those policies on our own.
We worked with third-party health authorities in this country that did include the CDC, the FDA.
Okay, so I will be sending you a letter, and I want to know who those health authorities were, and I want to see the communications between them.
Will you commit to providing me that information for transparency's sake?
Senator, I'm happy to follow up on you.
I'm happy to follow up, but there's no way in hell we're going to give you that information.
I'm happy to follow up.
Your request and in July of 2021, talk about misinformation.
This should have been the 2021 lie of the year.
President Biden said, you're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccines.
You're not going to get vaccinated.
You're not going to go to be the hospital, or you're not, if you're not vaccinated, I'm sorry.
If you're vaccinated, you're not going to be hospitalized.
You're not going to be in an IC unit, and you're not going to die.
That's the President of the United States.
Well, it just so happens we couldn't rely on the CDC and the FDA because they weren't honest.
They weren't transparent.
They weren't giving us data.
So we had to go to Public Health England.
This is a chart published from their technical briefing number 23.
It covered the period from February 1st to September 12, 2021.
593 cases, mainly Delta, 2,542 deaths, 1,613 deaths occurred with the fully vaccinated.
So obviously, this was just, this was published, and they were publishing other similar information during that time period when President Biden lied to the American public that this was a pandemic of the unvaxed.
And if you got vaccinated, you're not going to get, you're not going to go to the hospital, you're not going to be in an IC unit, and you're not going to die.
Well, 63.5% of the people fully vaccinated were dying in England at the exact same time.
Why didn't you pull this?
Have you ever labeled the president of the United States comment is a as misinformation?
Have you?
And by the way, they didn't.
It's a great point by him.
But you notice that they put up the lower third even at C-SPAN to block the 63.3% thing and the bottom data?
You think that's by accident?
I don't.
Ever done that?
Any of you?
I'll take that as a no.
So again, I just wonder who are the authorities, who do you think you are to censor information from eminently qualified doctors who had the courage and compassion to treat COVID patients when the NIH guideline was basically if you test positive for COVID, COVID, go home, be afraid, isolate yourself, don't do anything until you're so sick, we'll send you the hospital.
We'll give you remdesivir, where we have 1,600 deaths so far.
We'll put you on a vent and we'll watch you die.
And by the way, it's more than that.
Way more than that.
There's so many people that didn't even report that.
Okay?
They murdered my aunt the same way in a New York hospital.
I don't talk about it a lot.
They put my cousin on a vent immediately.
Refused both of them ivermectin, by the way.
I'm just going to give you the scenario real quick, okay?
My cousin in his 30s, freaking out, couldn't breathe, okay?
They bring him in.
All three, my aunt, my uncle, and my cousin, test positive, okay?
They immediately, immediately put my cousin on a ventilator, immediately.
All right, it's amazing he lived.
Within two hours of that, I called my uncle, because I found out within two hours.
I begged him. to get them on Ivermectin and get them out of that hospital.
Now, he tested positive too, but he was the only one that took the shot, so he got to go home.
Okay?
My aunt walked in there with no symptoms.
They took her off of all of her medications and she died within the week.
And then they told both my cousin and my uncle that Ivermectin was the same as Remdesivir and Remdesivir saved my cousin's life.
It's something I still have to deal with.
Red Voice Media Support 00:02:25
Okay?
And then you look at how many people Remdesivir actually killed and hurt, and we're only finding out a fraction of that.
That's the reality.
Happened over a year ago.
You guys bear a fair amount of responsibility for hundreds of thousands of people not being treated, and I would say probably dying that didn't have to die.
Damn right.
I hope you're proud of yourselves.
Yeah, I hope you're proud of yourself, Murder.
We're not in the second round here.
My man.
There it is, guys.
I know you had to come over to Rumble and Rockvin.
I do appreciate it.
I want you to share the video.
If you can support me, down below is the Buy Me a Coffee.
So is the PayPal.
That's another great way to directly support this broadcast.
We're doing a weekly show exclusively at Red Voice Media.
You go to redvoicemedia.net slash Jason.
You subscribe through that.
It also helps support me.
And by the way, they've been awesome.
They gave away the first half of my premium right out of the gates.
They cut out a snippet of the second half of the premium.
After two weeks, it goes free anyway, because this information matters.
I want as many people to see it as humanly possible.
Okay?
So Red Voice Media, another great way to support me right now.
Rumble, thumbs it up.
Let people know about the channel.
We just started a Telegram as well.
I want to remind people, I'm a documentary filmmaker, Loose Change Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, a New World Order Defined, and Shade the Motion Picture.
They're as relevant today as they were over a decade ago when I made most of them.
Shade's nine years old.
It's unbelievable.
I mean, Shade is going to be a decade old in six months in April.
Another hundo from my man Telegram or Telegraph.
Thank you so much.
This is so you can treat your nieces to a lunch with Uncle Jason.
I'd like to do that.
I hope you know how much you're appreciated.
We could never pay you enough for the value you bring to our lives.
Good night, brother.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I'm going to bring a tear to my eye.
Share the movies, guys.
Look, I'm telling you right now, it's never been about left or right to me.
I'm never going to bullshit you.
I'm never going to make up intel sources.
I'm never going to grift.
I'm always going to tell the truth.
And I'm always going to strive to tell the truth in the most powerful manner I absolutely can.
So I love you.
Export Selection