All Episodes
Previous Next
June 14, 2022 - Info Warrior - Jason Bermas
53:49
WEF Partners With The Metaverse For A Transhumanist Agenda

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/jasonbermasShow more https://rumble.com/c/c-1647952 https://rokfin.com/JasonBermas https://theinfowarrior.podbean.com/ https://www.youtube.com/InfoWarrior https://twitter.com/JasonBermas PayPal [email protected] #BermasBrigade Show less

|

Time Text
Bringing Us Into the Virtual Era 00:02:00
Hey everybody, Jason Burmes here, and the World Economic Forum kind of quietly partnered with the metaverse at this last Davos meeting.
All right, and it hasn't gotten nearly enough attention, especially because they did two separate forums on the matter.
Now, I've gone through one of the forums.
There's a whole other forum out there that I'm probably going to cut the fat out of and do commentary on just like this one, because at the end of the day, this is about bringing us into what the virtual era.
This is a very, very important thing.
And these are the type of technologies that have been discussed and plotted along via the military-industrial complex and what?
NASA.
This is Dennis M. Bushnell now in 2020, disruptive technologies and their putative impacts upon society and aerospace entering the virtual age.
Let me repeat that.
Entering the virtual age.
And we often talk about this document right here, the future strategic warfare document, right?
And you look at all the tools at the disposal in 2001 and predicting that the bio-nano era, okay, it would enter in.
Did we already pass it?
Looks like we did right there.
It would enter in 2020.
And then the virtual age would be next.
And we'll display to you that at the end of the day, the virtual age is us merging with machines and people, quote unquote, uploading their consciousness.
So when the World Economic Forum tells you these things, believe them.
That's all I can say is believe them.
Looking at Scale in the Metaverse 00:14:49
And one of the big things about this, this is the public face of that agenda.
And I'm going to show you how questions are dodged, language is manipulated.
The gentleman from the UAE, I think, is the most frank and honest out of all of them.
I think the representative Chris Cox from Facebook dodges questions and really understands that this is going to be a two-tiered system.
All right.
Some of the real inequality of what we're going to see via this quote-unquote metaverse is actually discussed.
Aaron Sorkin is moderating this thing.
And we have to understand also, folks, that the World Economic Forum has its own page for defining and building the metaverse.
Like I said, there were two forums just a few weeks ago.
And they're trying to move from the theory to the practice.
And that means governance and generating economic and societal value.
And this is a next step into techno-fascist stakeholder capitalism that all runs digitally and on a blockchain and brings in a virtual world which they will try to seduce you with as they transform your very genome.
You think I'm kidding?
We're going to talk about it right now.
So let's thumbs it up, subscribe and share.
I want to let everybody know we're doing it across four different platforms.
If you're on YouTube, understand we're fully demonetized here.
We're censored here often.
All the uncensored stuff you can find over the last couple of years over at Rockvin.
You can also support me there by hitting the subscribe button on the desktop, endorsing me and getting everybody else's premium content.
It's like a Netflix for creators.
We're also on Podbean.
If you like the audio format, you need an RSS feed.
We also have videos there.
We're also on Rumble.
We're rumbling.
Okay.
And we also stream live over on Rumble if you want the full uncensored experience and you have that app.
If you want to support the broadcast, buy me a coffee.
But definitely check out all the documentary films for free.
Loose Change Final Cut, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, a New World Order to find a shade the motion picture.
Share them with others because these are subjects I've been talking about for a very long time, well over a decade, in fact.
So here we go.
Again, I cut a lot of the fat out, guys, but this is still, I think, about 18, 19 minutes worth of footage.
But there are so many issues that the metaverse raises, opportunities it creates, and we're going to dig into all of them this afternoon together.
And we have an amazing group of people here to talk about these issues of governance, of potential regulation, what those opportunities really look like, potentially even issues around inequality.
And then we'll get into the innovation and tech side of it.
Only about 60 seconds, maybe 120.
All right.
So before we even get there, I want to show everybody who's here.
Okay.
I want to show everybody this is we're going to be seeing Chris Cox.
He's the chief product officer at Meta.
Okay.
Omar Sultan Al Alama.
This is the World Economic Forum page for him.
He's appointed Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence and the Digital Economy and Remote Work for the UAE in 2020.
All right.
So a lot of this is based in what?
Global governance in every sense of the word and merging a digital reality with our very own reality.
Okay, that's extremely important.
And the reason I say that this is the face and not really the driving force, right?
Some of these people are players for sure, but they're putting out the agenda.
Peggy Johnson, she's there.
The metaverse will be unlocked by augmented reality, magic leap.
So this kind of some people will really be at the meeting and some people will be digitally in the meeting via the metaverse.
And that inequality is also talked about.
And then you have one of the creators of Second Life, Philip Rosedale.
And I think that he's frank at sometimes.
But again, a lot of this is just pushing the agenda.
In other words, gun control finds its way in here.
You know, the tragedies in Texas and Buffalo.
Of course, the carbon and climate agenda find their way into this.
And even the COVID-19 44 nightmare slips, slips right in there.
And what I wanted to show you guys is that the real deal is at Bilderberg.
All right, just a few weeks ago.
Look how much AI is sitting there hobnobbing with all these government officials across the world, CEOs across the world.
We got open AI in there.
Okay, let's start with Open AI.
Let's keep going down the line here.
And of course, LaCoon, he was the Facebook representative.
Then you have Inflection AI.
Henry Kissinger and Eric Schmidt, who are both there, just did a book together in a forum on AI.
You understand?
And here we are is Lacun, the vice president chief AI scientist for the metaverse.
Okay?
Lots of artificial intelligence representatives here.
And that was not discussed because that's the movement.
They're automating many people right out of society.
Yet another person from Inflection AI, DeepMind, was also there.
You get it?
And meanwhile, you have these representatives from GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, et cetera, all this stuff.
And they're meeting behind closed doors, closed doors in secret meetings, not this public forum.
So let's keep it along.
Okay?
20 seconds, getting a sense from all of you about what the metaverse is.
And to the extent you can add how you think it's going to impact our society, I would love to do that.
And I'm going to start, if I could, with Chris Cox on this issue.
Chris.
And this guy is the most disingenuous of the bunch, constantly evading questions.
Why he works for Facebook?
This is the PR rep, basically, for all the things they do.
So even before they kick it off, right, this is the first question after the forum is there.
What's he going to talk about?
Oh, he's going to talk about the gun tragedies.
We need to regulate guns.
Thanks, Andrew.
I wanted to start just with a message of support and condolences to the victims of the shooting in Texas, to their families, to the affected community, and to the people of Texas.
I know a lot of us are sending our hearts and condolences to them.
So I wanted to start with that message.
So if I look at this from a government perspective, the first thing that comes to mind is scale.
So if you look at the Travis Scott example, the concert that he did in, I think it was Fortnite, 56 million people attended that.
It was a matter of scale.
The biggest concert on Earth is around a million people or a million and a few hundred thousand.
He's talking about scale right here, guys.
And this is a UAE government bridge to the virtual world.
And that's what people have to understand.
There's going to be a lot of governance and government involvement in this.
You can definitely scale different goods and services to people across borders in a very seamless manner.
That's the first thing.
The second is, I think it's a new form of expression.
We used to imagine text on screen.
We used to imagine graphics.
Now we can imagine new worlds.
We can imagine new ways of giving these services.
We can imagine a new, let's say, paradigm between the virtual and the physical, which is augmented reality.
And I think we can create a bridge that we could never have imagined in the past.
So he's just talking about these technologies.
And by the way, a lot of this is going to involve what?
Forget about the track trace database society we already live under and has been exposed on numerous levels.
They're talking about things like the internet of bodies, sensors everywhere.
Let me repeat that.
Censors everywhere.
And privacy is brought up a couple of times.
And this guy, again, is the only guy that really talks about it frankly that most people have no idea.
And there should be a course just now, just now, for people who are going to go on the internet as they're in school and what they're actually giving away.
And it's funny because Mr. Chris Cox of Facebook kind of snickers at all that.
Well, first of all, I have a bit of a reaction to the word metaverse, just having read Snow Crash by Neil Stevenson.
And so that's a bit of a dystopian view that he had.
So what she's saying is it kind of sucks that we're calling this the metaverse when you look into what the metaverse is and it is a dystopic reality that is built around these virtual worlds.
Weird.
Weird.
Hmm.
I think at its highest level, I would think of it as the seamless merging of our digital and physical worlds.
The industry as a coalition is spending a lot of time starting to talk about standards.
What are the standards for an avatar?
What are the standards for travel between one space and the next?
What are the standards around privacy, around encryption, around how things like report buttons will work?
The report button is the key element to help somebody in an unsafe situation flag something about it.
The report button in an unsafe situation, standards and practices.
Now, obviously, there are going to be varying levels of immersion based on what kind of technology you're going to be able to have access to and afford.
That's number one.
But number two, here's one of the big issues.
Freedom of speech on these things.
Forget about that.
That's not even when they're talking about safety, these people constantly want to keep us safe.
We showed you the commercial earlier in the week that Facebook is now advertising that they have a team of 40,000, larger than the FBI, to keep you safe.
Who decides what needs to be safe?
And how we manage those experiences as an industry are going to be some of the most important questions on how we build something that's safe.
Well, here comes some more talk on safety.
And this guy, the Second Life guy, actually talks about how technology is benign.
In other words, it can be used for good or evil.
And we often talk about that here.
So this is an interesting quote.
I certainly think from a technical perspective, we can do everything here.
You know, I mean, between the various technology companies that are working on this now at such scale, we definitely can make anything we want technically happen.
I think the question is, and if you're asking, can we have a form of interoperability, say, in identity and moderation that is a stable, positive environment?
I think that's certainly true.
So it's intriguing to note that technology is kind of neutral, but right now we're appropriately concerned with some of the negative impacts it's had.
But I think the metaverse experience and the particular experience of bringing people together with the right shared rules, the right basic rules about how they can interact does have the potential of bringing us all together worldwide in the way that we're doing it right here.
And let me just say this.
If we're really talking about that immersive of an experience, I would say, you know, obviously the common sense rules that the vast majority of nations go by will be enough.
But these people are going to want to micromanage everything, everything, and include it on your social credit score and your quote-unquote trackable carbon footprint.
We've all seen that World Economic Forum clip going around.
We've all seen Klaus in the house talking about comms in your brains.
Now, we're going to show Klaus a little later.
We're going to show the NASA footage and how they're even utilizing NASA technology to be able to track trace and database.
Say if you're wearing a mask, because they can just go right in on that heartbeat.
Well, your heartbeat is just like a fingerprint, especially if they have an internet of bodies roving around.
Let's continue on here.
This clip right here starts talking about the advent of 3D meetings, people being in meetings, and then again, that augmented reality of others.
Do you think the World Economic Forum will live in the metaverse?
Do you think we'll actually travel here a decade from now?
And by the way, what is the, just give us even a time, from a technological perspective, a timeline for which this conversation, which seems somewhat theoretical to people, is actually a reality?
So a couple things.
I do think we will replace some amount of travel with 3D meetings.
Because, you know, pre-pandemic, I would get on a plane and fly cross-country for a two-hour meeting and then back again.
And looking back at that now, it's like, why did we do that?
Because we've proven we can do meetings, okay.
But, you know, the issues that you would have really truly replacing a physical meeting is you want that empathy that you feel when you're sitting next to someone.
You see their body movements, their gestures, their eye movements.
Much of that can be done in a 3D meeting.
So when we put devices, in fact, we use this a lot, my management team, during COVID, we would wear the devices and call each other and I would have a meeting.
All my team would be there in my living room.
And they were depicted, though, as generic avatars because you need to have cameras on you.
If you're going to depict Andrew Ross Surkin, you're going to need to have a bunch of cameras on you so we can capture you in 3D.
Well, we didn't have that, but we did know where people's eyes were.
We have four cameras on our device looking at your eyes so that we know where to place the digital content.
But I then could see, if you were looking at me, I could see that.
And there's a feeling you get when someone's looking at you, even in this augmented world.
And if you walked around my living room and behind me, I could hear you.
The spatial audio is awesome.
And there's just an empathy that you get in a 3D meeting that isn't possible right now in our 2D video conferencing.
So I think a fair amount of those meetings can be replaced.
Eyes And Ears In The Augmented World 00:03:30
Let me ask you a governance question.
So before we get to the United Nations, maybe ruling over this, the economy, I want you to think about that right there.
First of all, haptic feedback suits may not even be necessary.
We've always talked about the gloves and the suits, and that's what we see a lot, but they're talking about magnetic resonance rooms.
The World Economic Forum, we've actually shown these videos where that's going to give you the sense of touch.
Five senses virtual reality is again and again discussed by Dennis Bushnell of NASA.
That's why we go back to those documents.
Even what's commercially available now, you can kind of keep tabs on the people who are using avatars.
Now, obviously, eventually this is going to create have and have-nots.
And we're going to get into that in a moment.
But we're kind of going across the line.
And again, we trimmed a lot of fat out here.
Right now, they're going to talk about the economy and government, okay?
You know, the internet is somewhat borderless, but is defined by regulations in every country.
It gets more complicated, I think, in the metaverse, in that really, if it works the way it's supposed to work, it should be a borderless world.
And I could be in New York, and you could be the UAE, and Philip could be in Hong Kong.
And the question is, whose rules are supposed to apply?
You know, Chris mentioned this tragic shooting that just happened yesterday.
And I was thinking actually of a fascinating, and I think actually very scary situation, which was two weeks ago up in Buffalo, New York, there was a shooting that was taken live on Twitter, I'm sorry, on Twitch, and then taken down.
And a lot of the other social media companies took it down around the country in the United States.
Yet there's a law in Texas, interestingly, that's supposed to be about free speech and censorship that says you actually have to leave it up.
You'd actually have to leave up the video of the shooting.
Now, let me just stop you there.
I don't know that that's the case.
If that is the case, or that's happened in the past, I'd love for somebody to send me that.
I think that this is a really faux argument that's being made.
And I think what it does is it creeps in what?
More global governance.
And right now, we do have separate rules in other countries about the internet.
And that's fine.
I think that works fine.
Like, for instance, in Japan, they have a lot of different rules regarding, for instance, pornography.
In the EU, they tear stuff down all the time, all the time with copyright infringement or defamation where it doesn't happen in other countries.
Okay?
In fact, I hate the EU's rules right now.
I think they're very, very disturbing.
In this country, it's getting worse and worse by the day.
And we also know that the EU has a ton of hate speech laws.
Terrible, terrible stuff.
That's how it should be regulated.
But again, because it's the World Economic Forum and they're trying to move from the bio-nano era, which we're in right now, as rapidly as they possibly can into the virtual era, they need to harmonize these things together in their own words.
Regulating the Digital Metaverse 00:15:20
Which is extraordinary.
And so I imagine there's going to be different rules in different countries and different states, and how you, as somebody who's a government actor, thinks about that in this new world.
Absolutely.
So there are different types of risks that we need to pay attention to.
There are risks that need to be enforced by government, let's say, financial transactions that happen in the real world for goods that you buy in the metaverse.
Like you mentioned, the Air Jordans or the monkey art that you talked about, or board apes.
Board ape.
I call them monkeys, but they're an insult to the board apes.
So if you actually pay money for that and you don't get it in the metaverse, someone needs to enforce that action, right?
So that's one type of issue that governments need to talk about and in some way, shape, or form, come to an agreement of how that's going to be enforced.
Then there is the more extreme aspect, which is terrorism, really terrorizing people on the metaverse.
Because the difference is, if I send you a text on WhatsApp, it's text, right?
It might terrorize you, but to a certain degree, it will not create the memories that you will have PTSD from it.
But if I come into the metaverse and it's a realistic world that we're talking about maybe in the future, and I actually murder you and you see it, it actually takes you to a certain extreme where you need to enforce it aggressively across the world because everyone agrees that certain things are unacceptable.
So let me just stop that there.
Excuse me.
I think that this is, again, a really ridiculous argument.
As when we're talking about these kinds of virtual worlds, safeguards can be built in.
And how immersive are we really going to see in the next five to ten years, right?
I expect the headsets will shrink.
The problem is that when you're talking about this now, you're probably talking about people taking literal brain type chips where the feed is directly into your brain via these comms.
And it is that immersive.
But even then, because it's software, you could easily build it out so that people couldn't just murder you in, you know, whatever software you're running.
Because obviously, in some of these things, you are going to be quote-unquote murdering people with impunity.
Think about how realistic World War II and Call of Duty type first-person shooters are.
All right.
And then even the sci-fi stuff.
This could become very immersive and very real and very visceral.
And obviously, if you're going to do that and sign up for that, I would imagine that you would want the person to be at least 18 years old, right?
If we're going that route.
But who knows what the norms of society are going to be?
But it brings that false argument in, in my opinion, to bring in what global governance and restrictions of these things and the use of quote-unquote terrorism.
Okay.
There needs to be a conversation to the other level of the United Nations or the ITU or these non-governmental bodies where a certain standard is set.
So, again, nobody who's an elected official, and not the peasant class, but the corporations, the UN, the techno-fascists that have taken over.
This guy's pretty candid.
He's a little bit slick, but he's more candid than the other people, and he's very honest.
You do business all over the world, Chris.
Yes, that's right.
Obviously.
And you're dealing with different laws and different regulations in many different places.
Is this doable?
And is the UN going to be the arbiter of how this is going to in a what we call the splinternet and de-globalization?
Is there a governing body that can actually make this work?
There certainly are.
If you look at child exploitation, if you look at terrorism, there are international organizations.
Some of them are associated with the UN, some aren't.
You want international standards, especially for things that are especially cross-border, like terrorist content.
Terrorist content, let's empower the UN.
Let's act like they do a great job at stopping child abuse and trafficking, even though the Ebola scandal that nobody's talking about just happened in 2020 and not their first child exploitation scandal.
So you see how this rolls?
Terrorist content in the metaverse.
Oh, who's going to decide what terrorist content is in the metaverse?
It'll all be selective enforcement like it is right now.
All right.
And narratives that are pushed on by people like this guy, Chris Cox.
Okay?
Not great.
So here we have, again, the gentleman from Second Life pushing the United Nations with a singular rule set.
Maybe a more controversial statement, which is, you know, Second Life has always sort of thought of itself as a kind of a new country.
And it was something that I often said when we were getting started.
And I do think that while local community regulation is ultimately what we must build in the metaverse, if we have any hope of having a billion people regulate themselves as they do in the real world, I think that in the same way that the UN emerged, I bet you that as these shared systems become more useful, say just for meetings, we will collapse to a more singular set of rules, say around intellectual property or privacy.
We can't do anything else.
I mean, I think efficiency will drive it.
Is there a way?
Right there.
He says, efficiency will drive it.
We'll have one singular set of rules set, just like the United Nations came into being.
Okay.
Think about that.
And he even brings up privacy standards.
What privacy?
No one's guaranteed any privacy.
I want to make that extremely clear.
And here we're going to talk about owning your own info.
Aaron Sorkin kind of brings up, is there any way we can do this?
Come on.
I mean, we should be able to do this, right?
Blah, And Chris Cox, again, just talks all the way around it because he knows you don't own squat, baby.
We're taking it all.
Forget about the internet of things.
Forget about your geolocations and your metadata and your behavior.
We want the internet of bodies too.
That's the movement from the BioNano into the virtual age.
Not even a hundred thumbs up over on YouTube.
Can we get them up, guys?
Can we get this information out?
Who's covering this?
Who's covering this forum?
Way to do it.
Yeah.
Where the user owns their own data.
I mean, one of the sort of benefits of Web3, some of the blockchain things that we've talked about that may exist in terms of layering on top of this, there's this idea that maybe you could own your own data and even maybe sell it to maybe a meta or to other.
How do you see that?
So, first, the user should control their data.
That's like, oh, the user should control their data.
They always say, this is the same talking point you saw at all those show trials and hearings on Facebook and how they were bad for the algorithm spreading misinformation.
Oh, the user should always control their data.
Give me a break.
So, at any sort of combination of events, the user should have the ability to delete, to understand, and to have controls over how their data is used.
The user should understand that having data aggregated means they can have a much more relevant service.
I mean, the exchange of you can have ads that are relevant to you or ones that are generally irrelevant to you is an exchange that comes along with basically agreeing to have data collected in a privacy-safe and aggregated way.
But we all, and I'm here in Europe with all of you now, and we all just click on the accept, accept, accept the cookie.
And even though we now have more, we now have more control.
We don't all do that.
We don't all.
Some of us know our way about cybersecurity, and we've already set up dummy accounts and bot accounts with all types of things that make us very anonymous.
There are a certain few that actually know how to do that, but we don't.
Come on, come on, we're not all total morons.
We don't all just submit to the system.
I mean, the Cox guy rubs me the wrong way all over the place, guys.
Let's bring it right back.
Just watch.
Oh, yeah.
He's got his talking points.
He noticed he never said you were going to own your own info or there was going to be any privacy whatsoever.
He says, you should understand what's being done with it.
Okay.
But we all, and I'm here in Europe with all of you now, and we all just click on the accept, accept, accept the cookie.
And even though we now have more, we now have more control.
We ostensibly have more control, but in some ways we have less control because it's very complicated.
It's too complicated to actually control.
So is there a way to change that dynamic in the metaverse?
No.
That is the thing.
When you go to university, you have this orientation class.
You get oriented into what is expected from your university and what you should do.
You get that at work.
You get that in life in general.
You don't get that when you use the internet.
So most people are ignorant to what the trade-off is.
And that's why we have these problems of, I did not know that I'm giving this much information and this is how it's going to be used against me to monetize.
There needs to be a way for us to orient people on what it means first to go to the digital world, not even the metaverse, what it means to use the internet.
And this should be something that is in basic education in every single school in the world.
And you know what?
I agree with him there.
See, this guy, out of everybody up there, the UAE guy, makes the most sense.
I mean, they should actually let you know how many times, you know, every hour this thing pings back to headquarters with what kind of data.
IoT data, internet of things data, geodata.
All right.
How many times they're using voice recognition technology that isn't considered recording your conversations or video technology that isn't what?
Considered videotaping or taking your picture.
People should understand that and think about how much at a higher level you're going to see via the metaverse and these virtual worlds.
Yet we don't.
Because you need to understand that, okay, you can manage your cookies.
You can remove certain things that you don't get targeted.
There are ways for you to actually pay and get that service if there is, if that becomes a business model.
And then it becomes the person's choice.
If the person says, I actually like it the way that it is right now, I go for it for free, and they can monetize everything from me, then it's a personal choice.
Today, people do not have the right for information.
They do not understand what is happening and how they're playing a role.
They don't have, in many countries, maybe in Europe they do, but and probably in the UAE, the right of access to access their data and to understand what is being collected and the right to be forgotten, these rights in that way.
This needs to happen today for the digital world first and then get implemented into the metaverse.
I'm always really hesitant of the quote-unquote right to be forgotten because, again, it's going to be selectively utilized to empower the predator class and people who are their minions.
And, you know, those that have been smeared by the mainstream media or had campaigns run against them, et cetera, are never going to get rid of that stigma.
They're not going to have the right to be forgotten.
Okay?
So when you listen to all of these things, again, there's going to be a tiered justice system, just like we have now in a place called reality via their virtual reality.
I promise you that.
Here, they're going to actually talk about the haves and the have-nots and how this could create a divide.
I actually like this part.
A fellow last night who made a very compelling argument to me.
I did.
I don't think I personally agreed with it, but I was fascinated by it.
And he said, look, there's going to be people of means who are going to travel.
And then there's going to be people maybe of lesser means who might actually be able to use an Oculus or a Magic Leap or some other kind of device to travel to the same place, but from their own couch.
But in many ways, it's actually going to create even more distance between those two people that psychologically, and I think that we've experienced this through social media, in many ways, it's brought people closer in certain ways, but actually created this remarkable divide because it's even more visible, actually, the divide in certain ways.
An example of a grave challenge and danger that we now face is precisely this, that as we begin to travel again, we will separate into two classes, basically.
Those with the means to travel and meet face to face, and those who are left behind on Zoom.
Let's just stop it there.
That needs to be expanded upon a lot more because they want to control your carbon emissions.
They want to control your travel.
It's been talked about in this country.
They want to start taxing you by the mile.
They want to get rid of what kind of car you can drive.
The haves and the have-nots, many people will be forced into this metaverse.
You wonder why I call this a transhumanist agenda?
Because they don't want you to have human interactions.
They want you further away from the very visceral human experience while trying to, again, trick you into a digital visceral experience that releases endorphins and fools you into believing it's a better system.
I can do things here that I can't do in the real world.
It feels so real.
All right.
But at the same time, it's going to create this system that there are certain people that can actually go to the mountain and hike it.
And you might not be able to, huh?
You've already spent your carbon credits.
How are you going to get there?
And that place, well, that's a no-go zone.
That's a no-go.
That's a nature zone.
You're not allowed to do that unless you got a certain badge or a pass or a color level.
Okay?
So, right here, this is another really good warning from the second life gentleman.
And in hybrid meetings, a particular concern I have, those meetings we have with our teams where two or more people are in the room together and thus enjoy real eye contact and real intimacy, and everybody else is on the Zoom call.
Think how bad that's going to be.
We don't know it yet because in COVID, we were all on Zoom, right?
The CEO was on Zoom, everybody was on Zoom.
Now we're about to have half the people on Zoom.
And speaking of COVID, now we're going to bring up carbon in particular and masks.
And again, this is going to be a great solution to everything, to both those things.
You won't have to travel.
It's going to be great for carbon emissions.
And don't, you know, I'm not so comfortable with all these people around me not wearing masks.
Thanks, Facebook's Chris Cox.
Zoom Without Masks 00:02:34
We could have a Davos, a World Economic Forum that is completely in the metaverse.
And that if everybody's just sitting on their couch all day long, all the time, how that changes just the personal dynamics that people ultimately have.
There's going to be trade-offs.
I mean, I can imagine a lot more people being here that didn't need to, you know, burn a bunch of carbon flying planes and then expose ourselves without masks.
Oh, my goodness, expose ourselves without masks and burn the evil carbon.
These people are never going to stop riding in their private jets where they want and when they want.
Our militaries are never going to stop testing and utilizing things that pollute our environment far more than carbon ever could.
That's not happening.
I mean, this guy is the works.
Okay?
I would kind of prefer that experience in some ways.
Oh, yes.
I'm a member of parliament from Switzerland.
Very quick question.
So here we're going to get to the extremists.
All right, we're getting towards the end right here.
These are the two questions I put in there.
And really, the second woman's question is completely dodged.
And this is going to bring us back to this flavor where the virtue signaling is there.
We need this set of rules.
We need to regulate standards.
We need to stop extremism and terrorism.
Also important for democracy.
What we see in social platforms is that extreme people tend to stick together and stay together all the time.
Now, if metaverse is super attractive, people spend the whole time in metaverse.
Isn't there the risk that they don't meet real other opinions and this extreme divide, or extreme groups and the divide of the society is reinforced?
Or what can we do to avoid this?
Issue of polarization.
Who wants to take it?
I'll take it first.
I think there's two ways that we avoid that.
The first way is that our virtual spaces, like the real world, need to have in-between spaces where we can meet in between groups.
We cannot, it is very difficult to become extremists when you are in a room containing a number of people who have different viewpoints.
And so virtual worlds can bring people, lots of people together in one shared space.
And by doing that, they can reduce the risk of extremist behavior.
The second one, which we can argue on, is I think that some of the business models like advertisement unfortunately have at least cracks that are slipped through where we are amplifying these behaviors through suggesting essentially worse and worse forms of or pushing people farther and farther into polarization.
Emerging Technology's Privacy Challenges 00:04:16
So no ads and letting people share a single space rather than just be in a small room.
And by the way, he talks about a no ads model.
That's not realistic.
In fact, they discuss how that's not realistic.
I didn't really get into all that.
Here you have a woman talking about the privacy issues, and really none of it's ever answered.
That's the next thing.
And then we're going to go to an older clip of Klaus from 2016, speaking in another language, really showing you how global this is, okay?
Not only talking about implantable chips, but the internet of things through sensors everywhere and on wearables, the TrueTrack Trace Database Society.
And then we're going to show you how the WEF also continues to push what?
Technologies that they're going to utilize post-pandemic via NASA and other things.
So here we go.
Let's get to this final question here that gets dodged, of course.
This is Udal Khazimi.
I work in emerging technology R ⁇ Ds and UAE.
My question is, how do you see the metaverse revolutionizing the way we build emerging technology today?
Because number one, we're basing this new model on a legacy system.
And we need to be very careful because, for example, the right not to be analyzed, we don't have algorithms at the moment to prevent analysis if I choose as a user not to be analyzed.
The right to be forgotten, we don't.
We don't have any of this.
We don't have the right not to be tracked traced about.
They all dodge this.
And the thing.
Algorithms that are built to forget you if you have a digital trace online.
Plus, the fact that this technology is built on specific type of security parameters, the cryptographic parameters, that if the next evolution, as we have seen today, there was a declaration from the IBM CO saying within 2025 we will have quantum power.
And if we have quantum power, it deems 70% of our security obsolete.
She's killing it.
She got real questions, and they don't answer any of them.
So what would happen to the metaverse in this sense?
So how can we change the development change of technology here?
The way we develop technology for the metaverse?
How can we change it?
How would it impact the emerging technology norms that we are building?
Number one.
And number two, how can you build a ripple effect?
40% of the world is disconnected.
How can you build a technology where it creates a ripple effect, automatically connecting the rest of the 40% of the world?
Sure.
Because you're focusing on connecting the actually 60% who are connected.
So again, they'll answer the end question of how they're going to connect everybody.
But nobody wants to answer the privacy issues.
Let's get a view from Chris real quick and a view from our government official on the same issue.
So first is I think to the question of how do we build something that's inclusive, I think part of what's so good about this.
It's always inclusive and diversive and it's going to be creative.
This guy's the worst.
What's happening is we're in the very early stages and we're having the conversation at Davos.
We're having the conversation among industry.
The internet in some ways just happened and we found ourselves in many cases scrambling to understand how to apply some of the safety standards we wanted.
We hadn't figured out encryption when the internet was born.
We hadn't figured out examples like the right to be forgotten.
I think the good news for now is we're going in with at least the internet as a set of examples that we can use for better and for worse on some of the how we solve some of the problems.
To the question on connectivity, a lot of us collectively are working on connectivity.
There's going to need to be infrastructure that's not built yet.
One.
I think a number of the folks here and a number of the panels have focused on that infrastructure.
But I think number two, we need to make sure that it doesn't require expensive hardware.
There needs to be consumer experiences on phones.
We're quickly getting to a world where most people are going to have a phone, where they can have access to the experiences so that we're not building a universe for expensive, sort of wealthy, sort of early adopters.
Humans Versus Bandwidth 00:09:10
Let me just stop it there.
And then we're going to get into this World Economic Forum piece where they talk about some of the technology.
He knows damn well that it's not so much going to be phones, especially five to ten years if they get their way.
It'll be internet of body devices, the comms, which are discussed.
That's the infrastructure that they want to build.
Okay, so let's play.
See, I do this sometimes.
I forget that I'm on certain shows.
I was on, quite frankly, last night.
You can follow him at Political Orgy.
I'm probably going to be posting that as well on my channel.
It was great to be on his show.
He rocks it.
This is actually my PayPal.
If you want to support me that way, although buying me a coffee would be great.
Okay, so let's play this right here.
This is World Economic Forum, NASA Tech.
Let's slave it.
What do you want to keep?
Yeah.
Five ways.
Let's lower it now.
You know what?
Let's get rid of all the music.
I can't stand it.
Five ways.
The pandemic's just going to change everything forever.
We're going to have offices reimagined.
Remember, we were talking about these 3D meetings.
They're going to show different, you know, everybody's wearing a mask.
It's the best thing since breakfast.
I love it.
Can't get enough of it.
There's Purel everywhere.
There's QR codes.
All right.
We're going to reimagine everything.
You're going to have 15-minute advent spaces because you're really not going to be traveling much.
You're going to be in your little pod, right?
They're going to be hubs.
They want you all together.
Okay.
And bars, gyms, galleries, networking opportunities because you're living on top of each other.
Everything's a 15-minute walk from your home, right?
Cloud markets.
So these cloud markets are basically, you know, just everything is made to deliver.
They're small places.
They're not actually restaurants where you gather with people.
This is transhumanism.
Again, everybody's wearing a mask.
We're going to deliver your services.
Okay.
And then you could be identified by your heartbeat.
They slip this one in here.
Forget about the facial recognition systems because, hey, they're often stumped by the masks.
All right.
But your heartbeat is just as unique as your face.
And NASA has invented a system that can ID you from your heartbeat using a laser.
They love you.
They love you.
And digital technology is also going to change the way your children learn.
Okay.
There's going to be a lot more AI involved.
There's going to be these headsets involved too.
On the way to a transhumanist future.
And here's Klaus in the gang.
It's my man Klaus.
All right.
And somebody actually put the subtitles here so we can follow along.
Okay.
Let's just get it with right here.
Oh, chips in your head.
When are we going to have the chips in your head, Klaus?
Great man, that Klaus.
In fact, let's just put it over here into the guest mode.
I think we have a little bit more insight right here.
Okay.
No, the next 10 years we'll have it.
And by the way, this is 2016.
So he's talking about on a mass level, it already exists.
We're going to show Dennis Bushnell, the man behind the documents, Future Strategic Warfare 2025, and the entering the virtual age document.
There's already a couple hundred thousand in 2018.
We're going to implant stuff in our clothes.
We're going to implant them in our brains and our skin.
Awesome.
And we're going to have a direct digital communication between our brain and the digital world and this metaverse.
It's a...
It's the fusion of the physical and digital and biological world.
It is the fourth industrial revolution, okay?
So I want to play this clip.
This is Bushnell talking about that merging with machines.
And then we're going to play him actually talking about how, at the end of the day, we're uploading our consciousness, and we either become machines, they become us, or you have human-contaminated machines.
Humans are now becoming cyborgs.
We have cochlear implants to hear.
artificial retinas to see, artificial hearts to live, artificial limbs to move, artificial organs to functions, and brain chips.
There's a couple hundred thousand people wandering around with brain shifts now to fix generally defective brains and increasingly to fix memory and other things.
DARPA's working on brain shifts for super soldiers.
And people are now working, thanks to Musk and other people, funding direct machine-brain communications.
It's not us versus them, us versus the machines.
We're merging.
And this is the human evolution of the humans.
There is no more natural evolution of anything.
People are convinced that the human evolution of everything is 10 million times faster than any natural evolution.
And so this is just part of the human evolution of the humans, which will apply in a little bit when I talk about something else.
Now, I want you to think about that.
You don't have a choice.
We're merging with the machines.
Evolution is over.
We're taking it over.
I'm a representative of the military-industrial complex, of that scientific technological elite that Eisenhower actually warned about in his farewell speech.
Okay?
And I'm going to bring up now the clip right here.
Let me get this.
The machines are capable.
Oh, sorry.
Right here, where Bushnell lays it out again, right here.
What's going to happen?
What do we do with all these people?
Well, again, we're going to, and here's the thing.
When they talk about the virtual world and uploading your consciousness, that in the very beginning is really going to be just a trick and a lie to cull poor people that have already essentially assimilated with the Borg, that have adopted these technologies, that have been champions of transhumanism.
And the last grip will be able to trick them into believing they can somehow upload their very humanity, their consciousness.
No, they can't.
Okay?
So here you go.
Here's what we do.
There will be essentially no jobs the machines cannot do.
We currently have creative software that are doing ideation just as good or better than humans now.
The creative jobs would be the last ones to go, but I have not been able to discern any jobs that machines cannot do as machine intelligence and all the rest of the autonomous robotics develops.
So now we're to your question.
Okay, what do you do with these people?
There's essentially three options.
You've covered one, which is the guaranteed income.
And the machines can produce the productivity, the wealth necessary to pay this.
It's just the machines do the work instead of the people.
Yes, you have to change the cultural know you, but this is eventually doable.
So universal basic income being talked about, automation, and the fact that most of us are just going to eventually, I guess, become useless eaters and allow automation to dominate humanity On benefiting economic growth for a predator class, hell-bent on transhumanism.
But here we are.
We're going to merge with them.
That's what's actually going to happen, right, Dennis?
This is only one approach.
The second approach is the fact that what's changed since you last looked at this is the whole technology level.
And we humans are now converting ourselves into sight works.
We now have artificial retinas, artificial hearts.
We have brain chips.
DARPA is working on brain chips for super soldiers.
We can have a high-bandwidth comp port built in so we don't have to use the sensors and they have very limited bandwidth.
And eventually, this all ends up with uploading into the machines.
And instead of us versus them, humans versus the machines, we become them, or they become us, or you end up with human-contaminated machines.
Human contaminated machines.
We become them, they become us.
Rumble Rockfin Rumble 00:01:31
Again, I would encourage people to go check out Disruptive Technologies and Their Punitive Impacts Upon Society and Aerospace, entering the Virtual Age 2020 document, and then compare it to the Future Strategic Warfare document in 2001, which seems to be a blueprint of what we have lived over the last 20 plus years.
The metaverse is here, guys.
People like Jan Lacun are meeting with others at the Bilderberg group and talking AI, talking transhumanism, talking World Economic Forum talking points.
Metaverse governance, economics, and societal values from a headset.
If you enjoyed this video, consider donating $5, $10, $15.
It means the world to me.
It keeps this going.
Buy me a coffee.
The links are down below.
What I really want you to do is check out all the documentary films for free.
Loose Change, Final Cup, Fabled Enemies, Invisible Empire, a New World Order to Find, and Shade the Motion Picture.
Share them with others.
See everything uncensored over at Podbean, Rumble, and Rockfin.
And Rockfin is another great place to support me.
I love you guys.
It is not about left or right.
It is about right and wrong.
This is a very real, great reset agenda posed by a false, great narrative on behalf of a predator class hell-bent on a transhumanist agenda that does not include you or I or benefiting humanity in general.
Export Selection