Feb. 24, 2026 - American Journal - Breanna Morello
02:39:28
Full Show: Looming US Invasion of Iran Could Trigger WWIII & RFK Jr. Defends His Stance on Trump’s Glyphosate Executive Order
RFK Jr. defends Trump’s glyphosate executive order, linking its 2006 wheat use to rising gluten allergies and celiac disease while dismissing claims like Patrick Moore’s that it’s harmless. He ties tax enforcement to Epstein’s alleged pedophile networks, citing IRS manipulation in U.S. v. Benjamin Howe and $38T debt as proof of systemic overreach. Daryl Day, a Texas congressional candidate, opposes U.S. intervention in Iran but backs Israel’s role, while pushing for Greenland’s purchase due to its $1T+ rare earth minerals. Both critique vaccine mandates, CPS corruption, and foreign influence in U.S. politics, framing resistance as essential to preserving sovereignty. [Automatically generated summary]
The Epstein files continue to crumble the foundations of an old world loosely strung together by its anointed Luciferian power broker.
Connections to Saudi royalty have surfaced, while Epstein being authorized to land at UK Royal Air Force bases has the British government scratching its head.
unidentified
But who, if anyone, is following up what we now know from one email that I discovered, which is short, but brings in the Children's Investment Fund, of which Rishi Sune was a partner.
The advisor that sent it, who then goes on to also advise Sarah Ferguson, who is given a royal appointment from mum, the Queen, for some sort of role that we don't know of, who the next day jumps on a plane to China to arbitrate a trade deal that is facilitated with Prince Andrew, who, as we know, then goes on to take probably a wholly different group of Chinese people into royal palaces before we find out that they are not who they say they are.
The cold case of Alyssa Dmitri Java pops back up to the surface.
A 17-year-old Latvian teenager went missing in August of 2011.
A dog walker stumbled across her badly decomposed, partially clothed remains on the Queen's private Sandringham estate in Norfolk, prime royal hunting ground, the kind of place where the Windsors go to shoot pheasants and escape the spotlight.
Police immediately launched a full-blown murder probe.
Evidence piled up.
Phone pings placed her last signal near Sandringham.
Two men were in custody, yet no charges ever.
Now under scrutiny as the British royal family squints in the spotlight.
unidentified
There are villages within this estate, so it is open to the public in many places.
Only around the house is it very private and secure.
And this happened about a mile away from the main gates to the house, so it is in the Queen's backyard, you could say.
In Norway, across the pond from the UK Royal Demonic Pedos, Crown Princess Met Merritt's son, Marius Borg Hoiby, is on trial in Oslo, facing 38 charges, including four counts of rape, aggravated assault, threats, non-consensual filming, and more against multiple women from 2018 to 2024.
Newly released Epstein files expose hundreds of emails between Crown Prince Metta Merit and the Mater D of Satan from 2011 to 2018, chatting about island visits for her family, her boredom with royal life, and topics like adultery and suggesting naked women pics as wallpaper for Marius.
And right on queue, because she assumes she is above the peasants, she publicly apologizes for her poor judgment.
unidentified
I just think it's extremely sad.
It's sad that we have people at the very top who think it's acceptable to associate with a convicted paedophile.
Former Prime Minister Thorbjern Jaglund, an ex-Nobel Peace Prize committee chair and Council of Europe boss, has been charged with aggravaTedros corruption over his deep ties to Jeffrey Epstein.
Epstein document dumps exposed emails showing Jaglund arranging solo and family trips to Epstein's luxury spots in Paris, New York, and Palm Beach, even after the financier's 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor.
Jaglund showered Epstein with gifts, travel perks, and possibly loans tied to his influential positions.
The Council of Europe has stripped his diplomatic immunity at Norway's request, clearing the path for the indictment.
unidentified
It is a very serious suspicion, and the circumstances that have been uncovered must be taken very seriously.
I am glad that I live in a constitutional state where the prosecuting authorities take their responsibility seriously, and I will be careful not to get involved because it is their responsibility.
Goldman Sachs accepted the resignation of its chief legal officer, Kathy Rummler.
Recent documents released by the U.S. Justice Department showed she accepted gifts from Epstein and advised him on how to address media inquiries regarding his crimes.
Rumler is the most high-profile banking executive to depart after the release of the latest Epstein files.
That's why I was like, that guy, you couldn't see, you didn't see the car in the other one.
So I guess somebody grabbed it and zoomed it in.
Our illustrious video editors out there.
I got a video, an image I'm going to show you later.
Somebody edited.
That was funny.
But let's get to the looming war with Iran.
Tonight, Trump has the State of the Union, which I imagine he's going to be laying out the case for dropping bombs on Iran.
But right now, I think there's talks going on in Geneva.
But he posted this this morning.
This is yesterday afternoon.
Numerous stories from the fake news media have been circulating that General Daniel Kane, sometimes referred to as Raisin, is against us going to war with Iran.
The story does not attribute his vast wealth of knowledge to anyone and is 100% incorrect.
General Kane, like all of us, would not like to see war.
But if a decision is made on going against Iran at a military level, it is his opinion that it'll be something easily won.
He knows Iran well and that he was in charge of Midnight Hammer, the attack on the Iranian nuclear development site.
It is no longer, it is a development no longer, but rather was blown to smithereens by our great B-2 bombers.
Raisin Kane is a great fighter and represents the most powerful military anywhere in the world.
He has not spoken of not doing Iran or even the fake limited strike that I've been reading about.
He only knows one thing, how to win.
And he is told, and he is told to do so, he will be leading the pack.
Everything, it is so hard to read Trump's writing.
My goodness.
Everything that has been written about a potential war with Iran has been written incorrectly and purposely so.
I am the one that makes the, he's the decider.
He's literally saying he's the decider right here.
This is a George Bush moment.
I am the one who makes these decisions.
I'm the decider.
I would rather have a deal than not.
But if we don't make a deal, it'll be a very bad day for that country and very sadly, its people, because they're great and wonderful.
And it's something like this that should never have happened to him.
Well, you know, I think it's because we got involved with that country in the 1950s, installing a new leader in their government, which is why we had it.
So put it on risk flags, major risks of operation against Iran.
You know, where did Huckabee didn't know this, where we got the information from?
Here's an AP video.
And I would say it's probably dated 2000, 2001, 2002, before many people were paying attention.
But this is Bibi talking about the intel they have about the weapons of mass destruction, which I guess at some point was given to Colin Powell because he showed the little yellow cake in the vial saying that this is what Saddam has, and we have to imminently stop him.
And he had these trucks and trailers, and then we go there and it's all U.S. weapons they keep finding.
Israel's nuclear weapons were created, of course, with nuclear materials stolen from the United States, from a nuclear plant in Pennsylvania, as I know you know.
I'm opposed to all of it.
I don't like nuclear weapons.
It's mass murder, as far as I'm concerned.
So, no, I don't want Iran to have a bomb, obviously.
Because we just had the Mar-a-Lago gunman, Austin Tucker.
Did they hire him?
He doesn't have a social media presence, by the way.
21-year-old, no social media presence.
Got the guy Butler, no social media presence.
Just a bunch of phantoms.
Do these people even exist?
I mean, they show us a picture of a person.
I got more on that.
I'll get to that after we finish up with Iran.
Here's Rear Admiral Kirby.
I wonder how he got that name.
He was the spokesperson for the Pentagon under Obama.
And he's being asked about these 200 nuclear weapons that supposedly, you know, well, Huckabee didn't offer any pushback.
He didn't say anything about it.
But here's what happens when you ask the head of the spokesperson, the spokeshole of the Pentagon, Rear Admiral Kirby.
You ask him about these, and he, boy, he just is like, what?
I have nothing to say.
Let's move on.
For clip four.
unidentified
Recently come to light an exchange between Jeffrey Leeds and former Secretary of State Colin Powell, in which he acknowledges that Israel has, quote, has, he says, 200 nuclear weapons.
And the nuclear non-proliferation treaty has not been signed by Israel.
Under U.S. law, the United States should cut off support to Israel because it's a nuclear power that has not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, according to Colin Powell, correct?
Okay, well, let me ask: is that do I have the correct understanding of U.S. law that we're not allowed to support a nuclear power that has not signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty?
Look, we obviously support the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
I'm not a legal expert on all the tenets of it, and I'm certainly not going to speak about the details that you've revealed here in this email traffic that would be inappropriate for me to discuss one way or the other.
I'm not going to do it.
unidentified
Are sanctions imposed on North Korea in response to their nuclear proliferation?
There were sanctions put on Iran in response to allegations of nuclear proliferation.
And now we have this email from Colin Powell saying that Israel has 200 nuclear weapons.
Why is Israel not facing any consequence for this?
I said, Mike, that we are fighting today the battle that the Maccabees fought.
They fought for the survival of the Jewish people and the Jewish faith against an enemy that wanted to extinguish us, wipe us out from the face of the earth.
We were fighting our battle, but we were also fighting the battle of civilization because our civilization is based on the Judeo-Christian tradition.
And if the Maccabees had failed, there'd be no Judaism.
There would be no Judeo-Christian civilization.
There would be no Huckabees who would play crappy masses.
There wouldn't be the United States.
There wouldn't be the civilization of freedom.
The respect for our common traditions, our common values, all of that would not happen if it weren't for those five brave brothers.
They actually made the whole difference.
So that spirit animates these brave soldiers that are here today and their comrades who are fighting in Gaza or in Lebanon or in Iran, wherever is necessary to not only preserve the Jewish nation and the Jewish state, but preserve civilization against the barbarians.
The barbarians are out there.
They did a horrible thing to us on October 7th.
They'll never do it again.
But they're doing it against Jews in Sydney and Jews elsewhere in America and elsewhere.
This is our common battle against the barbarians.
We have won it here.
We're winning it here.
We'll win it everywhere.
Chag Sameach. Chag Chanukah Sameach to all of you.
I mean, look, he shouldn't be out there playing baselines.
He should be being an ambassador.
But maybe that's part of being an ambassador.
When we come back, you know, I'm going to finish up on this and then jump into glyphosate because actually, Huckabee's Huckabee's little interview caused quite a stir because Jordan, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey, Indonesia, Qatar, Lebanon, Kuwait, Pakistan, Bahrain, Oman, Palestine, and Syria, plus the Arab League and the Gulf States, you know, had a joint statement they put out.
Grand Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, bringing us in.
Well, that was some.
I mean, I don't know how he became governor.
He should have been on the road with that.
It's been touring with Willie.
Like I said, his remarks in that interview with Tucker Carlson pissed off most of the Middle East and then Indonesia got involved as well.
And then he's like, hey, we're pissed off too.
So all those countries I listed earlier, they expressed their strong condemnation and profound concern regarding the statements made by the United States Ambassador to Israel.
It's Mike Huckabee, bass player extraordinaire, in which he indicated it would be acceptable for Israel to exercise control over territories belonging to the Arab states, including the occupied West Bank.
They affirmed the country's categorical rejection of such dangerous and inflammatory remarks, which constitute a flagrant violation of the principles of international law and Charter of the United Nations and pose a grave threat to security and stability of the region.
And these statements directly contradict the vision put forward by President Donald Trump, as well as the comprehensive plan to end the Gaza conflict, which are based on containing escalation and creating a political horizon for a comprehensive settlement that ensures the Palestinian people have their own independent state.
They underscored that plan is grounded in promoting tolerance and peaceful coexistence.
Well, we'll see how that goes.
I almost read this yesterday.
This is a 4chan post, and it was like where Israel is going to go on the first wave, tactical nukes, and a whole menu of death.
The Americans will go with high-tech weaponry, some of which derive from alien technology.
The Mulas will be vaporized along with senior military leadership.
A nuke will be dropped in the desert near Tehran as a warning.
Tactical nukes will be used on Iranian missile sites.
Karg Island will go up.
This will be over in a few days.
So, this is essentially, you know, kind of what's going on is Israel is giving us the opportunity, the opportunity to use some of our amazing weapons like the discombobulator, tactical nukes, our superior air force.
So, we should be thanking them.
And Newsmax is here telling us that, yes, we should be thanking them.
Here's Newsmax.
This is clip seven: demanding that Christians in the United States recognize Judaism as the foundation of Western civilization and declaring Israel as its savior.
See, we should be thanking the Israelis for allowing us the opportunity to go and kill more brown people.
Because that's essentially what we're going to be doing.
Clip seven.
unidentified
You go to any church or government building, the cornerstone is most often visible.
It's not usually buried in some dark subterranean corner of the foundation, never to be seen.
It is the stone from which the building springs upward.
There can be no doubt, however, that the building that became Western political thought and therefore the free world was built on a foundation of Judaism.
Without millennia of Jewish faith and struggle, there is no Christianity.
The foundation is an often unseen and much smaller component of a building structure, but it is nonetheless completely indispensable.
After thousands of years of war and diaspora, Israel represents the enduring presence of Jews and the protection of that biblical history.
Communists and Islamists understand the critical nature of Jews and Judaism to human society.
It's fundamental.
That's why they attack Judaism, not just Israel, and they want to see it erased from the Middle East.
Israel is therefore not just a political jurisdiction.
It is a representation of Jewish political, economic, and spiritual power that is related to Christianity and related to Western society and the free world.
The jihadists and the Marxists both know that a building unsupported by its foundation will crumble.
If Judaism is broken through the erasure of Jews from the Middle East, which is the goal of the Palestinians and the radical Islamists, then Christianity will also become more vulnerable.
Spreading generically anti-Israel messaging is anti-Semitic because weakening Israel's right to existence will lead to not only the killing of more Jews, but the erosion of Judeo-Christian principles upon which the Western world is based.
In 2006, they discovered that Roundup was a desiccant.
So that, and what that means, if you spray it on a crop, it will actually dry out the crop.
And one of the big enemies of the farmer is that if there's rain around the time of harvest, their crops can get wet and then they get moldy and then it ruins the entire silo.
Well, when your bluff gets called, your bluff gets called.
Now, here's an interesting: somebody jumped online and said, We don't need glyphosate to kill pests.
That's not what it's being used for.
It's being used to dry the wheat.
And even though it was originally an herbicide, your Roundup, they tell you to spray on your dandelions, right?
Remember the whole campaign to spray Roundup on your dandelions?
Oh, did you know dandelions are a great source of tea and like vitamin C that you can use, and it like helps your heart.
Like literally, you have it growing in your yard, like the answer to most heart problems is out there growing in your yard.
You can just make tea out of it out of the roots and out of the flower and everything.
No, You got to spray a poison on it that gives you ball cancer.
That's better.
So here's a video, and you just rolled the video of a machine.
And I've seen these before.
It's pretty interesting.
It's shooting lasers at weeds and pests.
Actually, just shooting these, just knocking them out.
And then this caused quite a debate on X.
We had the Ruben Hermit pointed out that, you know, the cost of glyphosate wheat is $10 an acre, but if you're using lasers, it becomes $300 an acre.
So then people went to Rock and said, Rock, is this true?
And Rock said this.
Rock said, hypothetically, assuming glyphosate causes 75 of those diseases and lasers eliminated.
So you're just using lasers.
So the cost is 300 billion for 177,000 machines at 1.7 million each.
And then you got to think of all the upkeep and maintenance.
I bet those lasers have to be cleaned periodically.
Annual government savings $101 billion.
Payback is in three years, less than three years.
And those machines have a seven to 10-year lifespan totaling 708 to 1.1 billion million to 1.1 billion net return on investment, 135 to 236%.
Causation debated actuals may vary.
And then it says, now you can write it as a business plan, including a PowerPoint presentation and present it to the legislatures who haven't sold their souls to big pharma.
But see, that defeats the whole purpose because it's not about weed killing and it's not about pests.
It was about drying out the wheat quicker so it didn't spoil.
So what's the solution?
What is the solution to the glyphosate problem?
It is to support companies that don't have wheat and flour that is sprayed with glyphosate.
Here's one.
We found yesterday, we actually invited them on, but I think they thought we might be a little too political.
I mean, you know how much it costs to get a delicious certification?
It costs a lot of money.
So seriously, check them out.
I'm actually going to order some.
I don't know if I'm going to order the tortillas, but definitely sourdough bread.
Big fan of sourdough bread with butter and honey on it.
Honey butter bread.
Ovenfreshdaily.com.
Tell them Rob Deuce sent you and tell them they should come on the show and we should talk about why it's so important to be eating grains and flowers without being sprayed with glyphosate so it can dry out the crops.
So there it is.
There's our glyphosate.
Matt tried to jump the gun and go to glyphosate early, but we weren't quite done with bowing down to the Israelis.
Here's another clip.
This is Kennedy again.
And I believe this is Kid Rock looking like a professional golfer and on One Nation with Brian Killmead talking about processed food because that's also another problem.
In addition to the glyphosate, we have this food that is made in factories so it could be made quickly.
And if you could actually look at the ingredients of like just like honey nut Cheerios when it first came out, it had like 10, 15 ingredients.
Now it's got like 40.
And of course, it's being made with dried glyphosate wheat, of course.
So here's Kennedy talking about the processed food we eat, why we should just eat regular whole food.
We have the worst chronic disease burden of any country in the world, and it's because of our food.
It's 70% of the food that we eat is ultra-processed food.
And it's not really food.
It says it's poison.
It's food-like substances.
We're going to change that now, and we're laser-focused on making it affordable.
The federal government pays for 45 million school lunches a day, and we are about to issue regulations and recommendations to make sure that our kids are getting good food.
And what we're finding is that it's actually cheaper.
Counterintuitively, it's cheaper to eat well than it is to eat processed food.
We're changing the military right now.
We already are into, we're going into 20 bases with Chef Robert Irvine.
And the meals that are now terrible that are given to our military cost $18 a day per soldier.
He's feeding them fresh whole foods for $10 a day.
So you don't need to spend more money.
You just need to be smarter.
And we're going to help educate people about how to do that.
And we're going to make sure there is fresh food in every jurisdiction, any place, the thousands of places that accept food stamps, the retail outlets in this country, are going to be required to double the amount of whole foods that they sell.
So that's Kennedy talking about the processed food.
But let's go back to glyphosate because he caused an uproar this week with this tweet that came out a couple days ago.
Let's see when exactly.
It's a long one, too.
I'm not going to read all of it, but this came out two days ago, February 22nd.
Got 2.7 million views.
Pesticides and herbicides are talked by design, engineered to kill living organisms.
When we apply them across millions of acres and allow them into our food system, we put Americans at risk.
Chemical manufacturers have paid tens of billions of dollars to settle cancer claims linked to their products, and many agricultural communities report elevated cancer rates and chronic disease.
That's the good part.
Here comes the bad part.
Unfortunately, our agricultural system depends heavily on these chemicals, and the U.S. represents 4% of the world's population, yet we use 25% of its pesticides.
If these inputs disappeared overnight, crop yields would fall, food prices would surge, and Americans would experience a massive loss of farms beyond what we are witnessing today.
So he's supporting President Trump's executive order to bring agricultural chemical production back to the United States.
So are we going to get organic glyphosate now?
Is that what that means?
And end our near-total reliance on adversarial nations, which is China and other nations where we get glyphosate from.
His executive order protects two pillars of national strength, our defense readiness and our food supply.
When hostile actors control critical inputs, they directly threaten the security of the American people.
The Trump administration will secure these supply chains and eliminate their vulnerability.
Now, President Trump did not build the current system.
He inherited it.
For decades, Washington designed modern agriculture.
Policymakers wrote farm policy, directed research dollars, structured subsidies, blah, blah, blah, basically to increase the amount of pesticides we use in our food.
Now, he says this, this is, I think, the key.
We are changing course without destabilizing the food supply.
So they're accelerating the transition to regenerative agriculture by expanding farming systems that rebuild soil, increase biodiversity, improve water retention, and reduce reliance on synthetic chemicals, including pre-harvest desiccation.
That's spraying Roundup on your wheat to make it dry out.
We're also driving the rapid adoption of next generation technologies, including laser-guided weed control, electrothermal and electrical systems, robotics, precision mechanical cultivation, and biological controls that replace blanket spraying with precision intervention.
These solutions are not theoretical.
Farmers are already putting them to work.
Markets are scaling them.
He's met with hundreds of farmers, and he's leading the HHS to create a gold standard of science working around this.
President Trump has opened the door to this debate and backed meaningful change, not only in policy, but the national conversation.
American farmers stand at the center of this movement.
They deserve policies rooted in rigorous science and economic reality.
Our children deserve a food system that protects and strengthens their health.
With the president's leadership, we're securing critical food supply chains, confronting health risks in our current system, and deploying every tool available to build a stronger, safer, more resilient American food supply.
So, you know, if people are reading headlines, they're like, oh, Kennedy backs glyphosate, which is not what he's doing.
What he's saying is, this is our current system.
We are going to secure these horrible chemicals, I guess, and make them organic.
So then we can deploy a new system, which is going to be based on having good soil and using, you know, these, I call them little finger robots that are going to pick weeds and stuff like that and lasers.
So, but of course, people were pissed off.
In 2014, he's or 2024, he said the herbicide glyphosate is likely one of the likely culprits of America's chronic disease epidemic, much more widely used here than in Europe.
Shockingly, much of our exposure comes from the use of a desktop on wheat, not as an herbicide.
From there, it goes straight into our bodies.
My USDA will ban this practice.
Yeah, because they spray it on and it soaks on right before they cut it down to let it dry.
So it's just sitting there.
It's disgusting.
And I'll end the food presentation with this.
This is Gary Brecca talking about folic acid.
Now, when this guy's here having kids now, and I've got four of them, and folic acid was always something the doctors said, you know, told my wife to take: Be sure you take your folic acid.
Be sure you take your folic acid.
And here's Gary Brecca talking about this of what folic acid actually is.
And when we come back, I'll have a little more to spread.
They put it in the food because folic acid, when it breaks down into methyl folate, helps prevent neural tube defects in pregnant women.
It actually helps a fetus develop.
When there was a high number of neural tube defects and miscarriages in pregnant women, they surmised that they needed to supplement with folic acid, which was patently false.
You need to supplement with methyl folate.
And so they required our grains, flowers, rice, pasta, cereals of any kind be sprayed with this chemical folic acid.
What we really should have done was spray it with methyl folate, the form the body can use.
This is the leading cause of postpartum depression in young women.
What is the first thing an OBGYN tells a young woman that gets pregnant to do?
Take high doses of folic acid.
What happens if she has that gene mutation, which almost half the women have?
She immediately goes nuts.
Why is it that we think that a man-made chemical that didn't even exist until 1993 is somehow essential for human performance?
You may have a genetic mutation that doesn't allow you to process folic acid.
They say half the population has it.
And it also tends to be the cause of postpartum depression.
So what you want to do is find a source of methyl folate.
And that's what you need to do.
Andre, what do we got?
We got a minute 27 left.
Let's just do this.
You know, in order for us to continue to work here and provide the information that we do, we do need your support out there watching, spreading the clips, spreading the articles, spreading the information, just spreading the word in general.
Like this bread company, you know, we didn't ask for anything from them.
I'm just spreading it because they're not spraying, they're not spraying glyphosate on the wheat they use, or they don't use wheat that has glyphosate on it either way.
That's the kind of food you want to put in your body.
And also, the other things you want to put in your body are, you know, different formulas of things.
Energy shots have been all the rage for decades because they really work.
But most of them are full of dyes and toxic stimulants and have huge crashes.
We set out to develop a product at thealxjonstore.com that has all the very best adaptogens, nootropics to biohack your body and not just help your brain, but every cell in your entire body.
We've done it, ladies and gentlemen.
Mind fuel is next level with no letdown, no crash.
It is very strong.
So I take half a shot in the morning, half in the afternoon, and it's just amazing.
And again, the effects go on for days and days and days because these are super nutrients that are in mind fuel.
For the time I have here, I can't tell you all the incredible ingredients.
So go to thealxjonstore.com and look at what is in it.
And of course, proprietary herbal ingredients as well.
Go now to thealexjonesstore.com and secure your mind fuel and be the reason we'll always be on the air.
Thank you so much for your support.
If you love our other products, you're going to love mind fuel.
I mean, we're here in San Diego, Balboa Park, and this is now the Museum of Us, which used to be the Museum of Man before Todd Gloryhall hung his darn rainbow flag up there.
That previous segment is pretty mind-blowing, isn't it?
I mean, when you start to put it in context of what we've been doing, we have been funding our own gallows, literally funding our own gallows in this country.
Oh, first of all, I don't believe we're obligated to pay.
People are not obligated.
People that are in the Constitutional Republic, which is what we supposedly are still living in, although the evidence would show you to the contrary when you look at the 10 square miles of the District of Corruption and the U.S. Code and the legislative democracy, like Nancy Pelosi will remind us, we, you, me, and everybody out in America land are a threat to their democracy.
It's because, yeah, we live in a republic and those guys function a literal corporate democracy governed by U.S. codes, which is corporation statutory code.
So when you want to, you know, structure this conversation, I think really, Rob, we have to kind of begin at the foundation.
We got to define what is income, right?
We have to know what that is because everything else flows from that definition.
And historically, the Supreme Court has described income as a gain, something derived from capital, from labor, or both combined.
And there's Supreme Court, there's cases out there, Eisner versus McComer.
That's where income actually had to be severed from capital.
And it's distinct from the principle.
There's other cases like Glenshaw versus Glenshaw Glass, where the court broadened that definition into undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized over which the taxpayer has dominion.
And again, nowhere are we talking about trading your time for labor when you work for somebody, right?
There is a distinctual definition.
Joe Bannister talks about that.
And I believe you've had Joe Bannister on your show.
If not, I know he's been on InfoWars.
He's been on Laura Ingram and other shows around.
He's been on my show for that instance.
But then Congress went ahead and did the unthinkable.
They codified 26 USC.
Title 26 is the income tax code, specifically subsection 61, where they say all income from whatever source derived.
And courts have been enforcing that subsection as written.
They consider it settled law.
But once income is defined very broadly like this, the real constitutional pressure point becomes how do you enforce the liability and how are enforcement records generated?
And that's where I want to take this story because this shifts from what you might consider to sort of be theory, you know, court theory.
And we know courts now use court cases as law, which in fact, case law is not constitutional law.
So this takes it from theory to the structure.
And I want to, if I can, move forward into some areas that you may not be familiar with specifically as the IRS structural organization is involved with their own oversight, their sort of own OIG.
It's called the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration.
Well, I'm going to take a pause because this is a massive conversation, but I want to kind of check in and interrupt me if I'm getting ahead or I'm not clear, because I want to make sure I'm abundantly clear to your audience.
And I think what we're learning now, Rob, is that agency government, as we now see it, and it's been on full display for quite some time now, is really at the behest of protecting the industry that they are regulating.
I think we can agree with the recent executive order on glyphosate, right?
You know, we see what's going on with that.
And where is the FDA?
Where is the USDA?
Why aren't they protecting the consumers from seriously a cancer-causing agent?
And we're now getting executive orders, which fly in the face of our right to pursue life, liberty, and happiness to impose that the states have to take this.
And, you know, in Florida, Rob, we actually battled that here in Florida.
We battled the whole glyphosate and the ability to speak out against it.
They wanted to put it into state law here.
And we fought both the House and the Senate in Florida.
And we got them to pull out the section of the bills that would have prevented us from using our First Amendment to say, hey, that stuff's bogus.
We don't want it in our food.
Please stop.
And we wouldn't even be able to lobby against it.
They took it out.
But then you have this executive order that kiboshes that, which frankly, I think should be sued on constitutional merits.
I'm digressing a little bit here, but I think the point is agencies are ruling us as opposed to the constitutional law.
Nowhere in the Constitution does it have any agencies.
So TIGDA's sole purpose, essentially, is oversight of the IRS.
It has two arms.
One is an investigation arm and one is the FOIA disclosure arm, the Freedom of Information Act disclosure arm.
So when you have a complaint, right, about the IRS, it goes to investigators.
And then those findings are later accessible via the Freedom of Information Act.
So if I log a complaint at some point in the future, I can go back and FOIA what I logged in and see, you know, where are we with this complaint?
So here is a very specific case example of what happened.
Since approximately about 2014, there have been multiple complaints that were filed with TIGDA, alleging that there was massive manipulation of what's called the IRS master file transaction records.
So Rob, every single person has what's called an IRS master file.
If you've ever filed, you have a master file and they know everything that's ever happened in your IRS history and transactions.
All right.
So in case you didn't know that, now you know it.
You actually have a file with the government.
There were four investigations initiated in a specific case, and I'm going to get to that here in a minute.
But when these FOIAs were presented on these investigations about a particular case, the results they got back were massively redacted.
And you're going to love the response because when we asked why, the TIGDA complained, well, that would give up our sources and methods and the privacy of IRS personnel.
Now, I just want to ask you, do you think IRS personnel actually are due privacy when it comes to operating as a public official?
And I'm going to get into the details of that, but I'm just kind of giving you sort of like a big picture here that once again, you have an agency.
You actually have an, you know, government oversight, TIGTA, that is now shielding people inside the IRS that have been proven to have committed fraud.
And I'm going to break that down here in a second.
So, you know, the fact that they're heavily redacting this stuff is pretty amazing because we're not talking about private citizens.
We're talking about public officials.
We're talking about public employees operating in a public office.
But here's where it gets really odd and totally irregular.
So this past January, there was a fifth complaint filed in this case, and an inquiry appears to have begun, but there was no formal complaint number issued.
So every time you log a complaint and you make an inquiry, it's supposed to give you a complaint number, but there was no complaint number issued on this particular case.
This is the fifth inquiry, fifth TIGDA open file initiated, but this one doesn't get a complaint number.
This is total deviation from TIGDA's intake procedure.
It's totally unusual.
But when we pressed TIGDA for the complaint number, they wouldn't even give a response.
So now all of this is part of this whole record in this ongoing case of United States versus Howe.
So I mean, I think you and I agree the government is never going to investigate itself.
It's never going to arrest itself.
It might do a quote cursory investigation, but it never amounts or goes anywhere.
We could go back to Fast and Furious, Benghazi, et cetera, et cetera.
So oversight that doesn't document itself, frankly, is an oversight.
1040A is the one where you ask the government to basically create your tax return for you.
And you have to initiate that by going on the government website.
So the 1040A really is the problem because according to this how case, there was a 1040A that was received and it was referred for examination, meaning there was a substitute return prepared.
But in the how case, Benjamin Howe's case, this apparently happened eight years in a row.
Okay, now remember I told you everybody has a master file and this MDSA, this master file is, you know, can be FOIA.
And during the discovery in this case, the Department of Justice was actually asked to produce a signed 1040A, which means Mr. Howe, eight years in a row, would have requested the government to prepare his return for him.
So the DOJ was asked for this 1040A referenced in the MDISA file, which is your master file under a return received date.
It shows there was a return received.
That substitute, you know, is a substitute return and it has supporting documentation if it in fact exists.
Guess what?
The DOJ admitted they don't possess a 1040A.
They don't have any substitute return, zip zero nada.
Yet the IRS individual master file transcript reflects that a return was received.
And if the record shows a filing event and the government admits that no such document exists, that is what we would call a constitutional fault line, meaning they lied.
They created something that didn't exist.
It was never initiated by the tax filer, Mr. Howe.
And he has a sworn, multiple sworn affidavits that says he never initiated the 1040.
Now, remember, you have to go on your computer, go to the IRS website, and request a 1040A return.
The problem that they have, and this has been well documented, and oddly enough, this all came out through Freedom of Information Act requests.
Some enterprising folks, Michael Ellis being one of them, who connected with Mr. Howe back in the early 2000s, recognized that we need to request all this information.
And oddly enough, they got back in FOIAs the responses that showed that the IRS had created a 1040A and then they deleted the request.
And so they have all the codes to prove this.
It's all in the MDISA file.
So now you have irrefutable evidence that there was a file created at 1048 eight years in a row.
They went in and manipulated his master file eight years in a row with a number of transaction codes and then deleted it because that file never existed in the first place.
But they created a debt stream of money that was owed by Mr. Howe supposedly for these taxes to the United States government.
So because that liability is actually being supported by a digital record of an event for which no physical or digital filing confirmation exists, there's no taxpayer submission, no receipt, no confirmation, nothing, but you have a transcript that reflects there was, you now have basically a real conundrum, right?
So it's really, it is, this is what I would consider such damning evidence of a government that's gone completely rogue, fabricating digital records, taking on, you know, taxpayers.
And this isn't, this is not just one, a one-off event.
This has happened before, but this is the most clearly documented and delineated case of fraud by the IRS.
And now these TIGTA requests, these, you know, TIGDA reports that have been filed where they're saying, hey, we can prove that, you know, IRS agents and lawyers for the IRS are lying and covering it up because we have the FOIA evidence.
And TIGDA isn't responding.
This has been going on since 2014.
I mean, they've got the transaction codes, the master file, and that individual master file, as I told you, it's the backbone database for all these taxpayer modules.
So revenue officers operating through these systems are problematic in the fact that they know it and they're covering up these allegations that codes were entered.
They created effects into your individual master file.
Then you had subsequent transaction codes removing the visible trace of the initial code.
All this is documented.
So when you have initiating codes creating an appearance of a filing or some kind of examination event that event that may not appear on the standard transcript provided in court, you see what I'm saying?
You now have caught these people dead to rights.
And you've got a digital sequence, honestly, Rob, that can generate a filing exam appearance and a follow-up code removing that trace of the initiating input.
It's not a tax debate anymore.
This is totally a database integrity issue.
And as we move forward at this digital prison, I know you guys on InfoWars talk about Valentir and the digital prison we're marching ourselves into.
You can see just how many tentacles are becoming massively invasive in our lives.
And because the courts rely on these forms coming out of the IRS individual master file as certifications for transcripts, and those certifications carry some kind of presumed presumption of validity, those presumptions are really powerful.
So, this is what gets into standing and jurisdiction.
So, you know, we've got to connect the dots there, but I'm going to pause and just see if you're still keeping up with this.
So, basically, the defense isn't whether or not he owes taxes.
The defense is whether or not he ever filed a 1040A.
And so, if there's a record that says that he did file it and the record's false, and the government, then, and then if we now know the record's false because we proved it through FOIAs and through the fact that he didn't file these, then if you have a false record, the government lacks standing.
And if the government lacks standing, that means the court lacks jurisdiction because standing is jurisdictional.
So, jurisdiction must be established before anybody's property can be seized.
And frankly, that is what they're doing to Mr. Howe.
His case is right now on appeal in the Ninth Circuit for an Idaho property he owns that the IRS is using to seize based on these eight years of fabricated 1040As.
So, when, and I want to be mindful of the times, interrupt me, but you've got five TIGDA complaints since 2014, right?
Saying, hey, something's wrong here.
You have four investigations.
You have absolutely no public refutation by the DOJ or the IRS.
And then you have a recent January 8th complaint without any sort of formal complaint number assignment.
You've got all these FOIA redactions shielding any of the details, right?
That would tell us exactly what's going on.
So, the great news is that the Howell and Howe and Ellis team have been keeping the Ninth Circuit updated because, again, his house is under property seizure right now.
They want to move forward with this.
So, they've been keeping them formally updated with all the information I just presented you.
But this is the options they were given, right?
They can either pause while TIGDA confirms the crop, the total complaint intake and sort of updates that, or they should vacate and remand to determine the impact of this sort of record manipulation allegations and manipulation on standing.
So, this is not what we would consider a normal appellate issue.
This is something that the Ninth Circuit is looking at.
And I think that they're finding out that they're a massive conundrum because the evidence proves that Mr. Howe didn't do any of this and the seizure is on completely fraudulent basis.
And so, and we're making this very public.
We're making this very public.
So, I'm going to pause there because there's more to go into, but I don't want to run over your commercial break.
Well, what it seems is we got a couple of minutes left.
What it seems is the IRS looked at this guy and said, hey, this is a guy, whether or not he's filing taxes on time or not, or whether he knew or not, or whether he didn't think he owed any taxes.
That all is not even being looked at.
As most people, most people who are taxpayers are like, well, did I owe it?
What did I owe?
We're not even looking at those grounds.
We're looking at the IRS creating records and returns that no one ever asked for.
You're supposed to ask the IRS, hey, I want you to do my return for me.
I don't have time to do it, whatever.
That's the process of why they have this 1040A.
And the IRS is just going, hey, we're just going to make you 1040As, not tell you about it.
And then eight years later, go, hey, now you owe us more money.
Imagine creating debt for your next door neighbor saying, hey, you know, I've just, I've just decided that because you are sitting next to me and your leaves are blowing on my lawn, I'm going to be charging you for this.
And that's even a more realistic expectation, frankly, than what the IRS is doing.
Just charging the neighbor for breathing the air next to you is basically what the IRS is doing.
They're fabricating this completely and putting the burden on the taxpayer to prove otherwise.
So if Mr. Howe didn't have this crack team of people that have been coming to his aid and doing all this pro se, I can imagine he would have been bankrupted already and probably in jail, except that he's had some exceptional people step up to the plate and do the due diligence of questioning the government and finding this.
And this is something Joe Bannister talked about.
He knew about the fabrication of 1040As a long time ago.
And he brought that to light, but he never had the actual physical evidence that the FOIA is produced in the Howe case.
Well, when we get back, I want to go into where they're going, where this case is going now.
What happens if the government, I guess the one solution is the government just walks away from it.
And if they walk away from that, what does that do for the multitude of other Americans who've had 1040As filed in their name without their knowledge?
So we come back from break.
We're going to finish up with Ann Vandersteel.
Don't forget, you could support us at thealicejonestore.com.
I'll probably do a little bit longer plug later, but thealisjonestore.com supports everything we do here, giving you information like this where you're not going to find too many other places.
Stay tuned.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Rob Dew.
Yeah, I just put whatever the end on the end of that.
Today we are now Vander wood chipping the IRS today and exposing them.
But in all seriousness, you summed it up perfectly.
The IRS created the debt trail, which ultimately is ending up in property seizure or attempted property seizure.
Unfortunately for them, two things happened.
A very intrepid crew of people came to Mr. Howe's rescue to fight this in court on his behalf pro se.
And second of all, the fact that the FOIAs, the Freedom of Information Act requests into all of this going back and forth with the IRS and with their inspector general's office at the IRS resulted in gaining access to information that proved the IRS fabricated these 1048 returns.
Mr. Howe never asked the IRS to initiate a return on his behalf.
And that debt trail is now what has led to the seizure.
So this, you know, as Infowars and as we talk about a lot, you know, the digital prison that we're currently being kettled like fish into with Palantir basically running all agency government.
Again, I stress agency government does not show up in this fine document penned by 56 folks who shed their blood, sweat, and tears over this 250 years ago.
We are really at the mercy of these machines and the digital enforcement state, as I would call it.
So if I zoom out on all of this in the digital enforcement era, you get a database entry like we just talked about in the previous segments, which then creates a transcript in your IRS file.
That transcript is considered your certification that this is in fact authentically what happened.
That certification creates a presumption and judgments come from a presumption and the judgment that we're looking at is seizure.
And this is where, you know, if a transaction, you know, creates entries reflecting events that never occurred, right?
Then you have oversight investigations redacting findings, like I said, at the OIG for TIGDA, redacting findings and deviating from the actual intake procedure, meaning Mr. Howe never went in there and created these 1048 requests.
Then you've got courts presuming that these transcripts are valid and they don't even, you know, they don't give any credence to the testimony or the affidavits that prove the back-end process was all manipulated by the actual agency itself.
Now you've got enforcement power becoming totally code dependent, not code-dependent, code, C-O-D-E.
So, and then they never look at the code.
They never go and look at the files, which was the evidence presented.
And then you've got people inside the IRS and their lawyers covering up and lying.
So this isn't, I'm not trying to say the IRS is a Republican Democrat thing.
This is strictly looking at a digital systems thing.
And this is in fact what we're being challenged with across the board.
This was a jury trial where he, the jury of his peers said, okay, we're trusting that the government's putting up quality documents, that these are authentic documents when they aren't, essentially, is what you're saying.
So you've got, you know, we're shifting away from the Constitution.
We're going right into statutes and servers.
And I say this over and over like a broken record, Rob, but the U.S. Code is not constitutional law.
And we can't, you know, we can't, you know, take hearings at face value when they are not actually based on the true transaction logs of what happened.
So we've got to create, we've got to stand up because there is a separation of powers concerned right now.
This isn't, again, a case about refusing tax law.
This isn't even about the record integrity because we can show you the records.
We can show you exactly what happened.
But this is about the government basically covering up.
And if their actual own admission isn't, is that it doesn't possess documents that the transcripts claims exist, then we got to look at the burden that, you know, on oversight and oversight is now redacting the actual truth of it all.
So if they won't even, you know, bring complaint numbers to new complaints that are coming out of the same case, and if the transaction codes aren't allowed to be examined, which we already have copies of because we've got them in the FOIA, then the question I think is really simple: who's going to actually audit the machine?
I mean, where does man and machine actually connect so we can make sure the machine is being truthful?
And I both know that AI fabricates stuff from time to time.
You know, you can ask Chad about something and it'll completely give you bogus answers and you can fact check it and find out and then you can correct it.
And it says, oh, my bad.
So, you know, because we're in America, we've actually got to, you know, we got to, we got to enforce the fact that standings must precede seizure.
And I just proved to you that there is no jurisdiction for the United States government in this case because their standing is bogus.
It's absolutely bogus.
And if jurisdiction has to precede judgment, then the reality of it is that the, you know, all of that must precede a database entry.
So I think we got to stand on the Constitution because, you know, if the Constitution is now, as we're, I think what we're seeing, it's becoming downstream of code.
It's all coming together the way the AI systems and the IRS is using AI to go after people.
And now I'm wondering, you know, how much of this is that's why I was asking when these 1040As were created because, you know, AI could go, oh, I can create 15 1040s in 20 minutes.
You know, I can, I'll go back and look through your stuff.
So I'm going to kind of pull this together going back to 1913 because we are now, I think it's really abundantly clear what has happened since 19, but since 1913.
So for those who don't know, before 1913, if you were going to be, if you had direct taxes, it had to be apportioned through the states, meaning the federal government couldn't go down and tax rob due directly.
Rob, let's say you live in Texas.
I don't know where you live, but I'm assuming you do because you're sitting in the InfoWar studio.
If you live in Texas, they have to tax Texas and Texas then apportions that tax to you.
Okay.
That was the control mechanism that basically forced Washington, D.C. to deal with the states as sovereign bodies.
Remember our 10th Amendment?
That was some friction, man.
It limited the power.
And then, of course, you roll out the 16th Amendment that removed that restraint for income taxes.
So now the federal government could tax you directly.
There wasn't any state to buffer it.
There was no real breaks on there.
And your labor became federal revenue.
But in 1929, here's what else happened.
They layered on where Congress capped the House at 435 seats.
Now, if you remember, we were supposed to be apportioned representatives for every 30,000 people in your state.
So for every 30,000 people in the state of Texas, you got one House representative.
Well, they capped it at 435.
If we actually did not have that 1929 Apportionment Act, we'd have over 6,600 representatives representing all of us.
Think about how much harder it would be for corporate lobbyists and foreign special interests to buy off, essentially, and bribe off, lobby off, if you will, 6,600 members of Congress versus only 435.
And remember, the IRS money is going into a foreign bank.
It's not going to a treasury.
It's not coming back here into the United States.
It's paying the debt service on interest created by a foreign bank, by something that's not part of our government, the Federal Reserve Bank, which we all know is an international banking cabal.
So as I'm selling you here, with our population that kept growing, our representation didn't.
So now we have tax power expanding.
We have our representation basically freezing.
We see the bureaucracy with all these agencies massively exploding along with our debt, right?
38 trillion and counting.
You're working.
I'm working.
They're borrowing against our labor.
We're paying interest on the debt that they're creating.
And that's the architecture.
So now we have a government with unlimited access to income and we have a very diluted representation.
And, you know, this stuff is scaling out of control.
It's totally, you know, and of course the government's telling, oh, nothing changed.
Well, first of all, I'm a big advocate for what General Flynn has been espousing for a long time, local action has a national impact.
And, you know, as I just, we talked about earlier, the executive order just on glyphosate, basically slamming the states.
We've got to get hyper, hyper local.
Frankly, I mean, the states really need to force the 10th Amendment.
I'm doing nothing but interviewing governors right now that are standing and planning on exercising the 10th Amendment on a regular basis because Washington, D.C., the District of Corruption is an abominable machine.
It's massively, massively overextending its arch of reach into all of our pockets.
And now they're trying to tell the states what to do.
That's not how the system works, Rob.
You know that.
And so frankly, the people have got to, you've got to learn, A, how to navigate around the system.
Nobody should own anything in their name.
You should be setting up trusts and taking everything out of your name and putting them into irrevocable trusts so that the government has no reach into you.
There is, as far as getting local action, you should be engaged in your own government.
You shouldn't be allowing these people to be the corporate special interests running your county.
My county is being overrun with developers that want to come and just build, build, build here in South Florida.
And I'm pushing back on my county commissioners.
I'm going to take a page out of what they didn't call your county.
I'm going to advocate for a Bill of Rights Sanctuary County where we actually can enforce the Bill of Rights.
Imagine we have to do this.
We have to actually enforce something that's constitutionally protected, but we've got to enforce it because as we saw in COVID, they're going to mask mandate.
They're going to give you shot mandates.
And our own state actually has a bill that needs to be stricken.
It has a clause in Senate Bill 2006 that says, hey, if there's a pandemic, the state of Florida can still decide arbitrarily whether or not we should be taking shots, you know, to, you know, if there's a pandemic.
This is completely against our body sovereignty and our fundamental rights and natural law.
So we've got to, you know, stand up that way, but we've also got to force the fact and question where there is a law in the IRS 16th Amendment that makes me personally responsible.
And Aaron Russo talked about this in his own documentary.
And his claim was that the tax code wasn't that the tax code exists.
He was being much more specific.
He was basically arguing that the IRS code defines income.
That code imposes a tax.
But he believed there's no statute that explicitly says the average American wage earner is personally liable for paying income tax.
This was done through the We the People Foundation.
Numerous IRS agents came forward and they said they went through that code.
They were looking for the $50,000 reward that We the People Foundation offered to say, show me the statute that says you are liable to pay income tax.
And Russo framed it as basically a statutory construction issue where he would specifically just say, hey, I'm a private citizen working for wages inside a state.
Am I liable?
And he suggested the IRS agents couldn't cite any statute directly.
So again, we look back to peeling back to 1913 when they initiated all this nonsense.
Again, this was designed along with the Apportionment Act to limit our ability to have any representation in any say on the matter.
And then, of course, you know, beat us into some sort of mentality that we actually owe the government money for something that they're spending money on that our tax revenue has nothing, this goes nowhere near any of this stuff.
So, again, the money that gets printed out of the federal government, you and I essentially don't even have a say on any of it because so much of it is going to fund all these agencies.
And let's be clear, these agencies are for-profit entities, and we didn't put those people in charge.
And now we've got these agencies that are breathing down our necks, all too happy to poison us with glyphosate.
And I don't, you know, I wasn't, I was part of the Maha movement in the sense that I worked with Dr. Zolenko on his foundation, but I wasn't one of the bigger Maha voices.
As a Maha movement member, I am beside myself at what we see happening right now because, you know, it goes against everything we stand for.
So, you know, this is kind of where I'm standing right now in all this, Rob.
And I just think that people need to become more aware of all this.
And they need to know that, you know, every American is not liable based on what the statutes are claiming with the IRS.
There's freedomlawschool.org and there's weissparis.com.
These two organizations know how to play the game with the IRS.
Think of it like a game of volleyball.
You want to keep that ball going back and forth over the net.
And there are numerous cases where Weiss Paris and or Freedom Law School, Freedom Law School tends to more argue and get your debt reduced, but Weiss Paris will go all the way to the mattresses for you to the point where the IRS finally realizes they can't enforce what they think they can.
And Weiss Paris is, they've got a fantastic website.
It's W-E-I-S-S.
And I apologize, Matt.
I should have sent this to you, your producer.
But WeissParis.com has got a phenomenal website full of information.
And they represent thousands and thousands of people on this because people are standing up.
And frankly, if we all stood up and said, yeah, we're not going to comply with your federal nonsense anymore.
We're going to focus on our states.
Then, you know, I contend that the federal government would have to, by default, reduce itself dramatically.
And I had hoped we would see more of that from this administration.
I would hope we would have seen the Department of Education gone already.
Whatever's going on there, it's slow going, but we the people are the bosses and we have to tell them we're done with your games and we are moving on.
Well, what I think we're seeing is these organizations and federal agencies are a lot bigger than we thought they were.
You know, you just see it as a building.
You don't see where all the tentacles run on behind the scenes, like, you know, through all these, through all the codes and through all the infrastructure and the databases.
I mean, I think the databases are really the turning out to be the true enemy here because that's how the information is shared quickly, which allows the government to act more quickly.
Because when, you know, when government's left to its own devices, if it was back in the old days, it would take a long time for this stuff to come to fruition, but they're able to circumvent, I guess, the slowness of government using, you know, AI.
And maybe that's why they're pushing for all these data centers.
So they can really just turn the control grid up, basically price us out of having power and clean water and then go, well, now you're in, now the grid is complete.
We're going to give you digital money, but if you don't do everything we say, we turn off the digital money because that's where it's going ultimately.
And, you know, this is where we're going right now.
I mean, we need to know that we have to rely on our local communities.
I can't be bartering with you in Texas.
I'm out here in, you know, in South Florida, but I have a great community around me.
And that's where we're at.
And people need to know that the 16th Amendment, it was never properly ratified by the required number of states.
I mean, essentially, these states that got the amendment and had to read through it and make any edits, they didn't send the information back properly.
Everything has to be transmitted according to statutory code.
And the transmissions from many of those states were out of order, essentially, making it illegitimate for the ratification.
So that is, I mean, that is another example of how the 16th Amendment was just stuffed down our throats without even proper ratification.
And, you know, we shouldn't accept that because if we don't cross our T's and dot our I's, Rob, what happens?
I've never seen as much chatter on X about people going, why am I paying my taxes?
Why am I doing this?
Because they're seeing, you know, they want to see real change and they're looking at the, we're getting the same as before.
I mean, I think we're having some wins, but overall, it's just, it's not enough.
And people are sick and tired of waiting around because we've been waiting around for a long time to see real change in what's going on in government and all the black ops, all the just murder, death, drug trafficking, child trafficking that goes on and is institutionalized.
I mean, the CPS is the biggest child traffickers in the United States at this point.
You know, it's not even, but, you know, they're going around arresting low-level guys because I guess they're cutting in on the on the business.
That is near and dear to our foundation's heart, American Made Foundation and American Made Action.
We're actually working what I would consider a ball or a group of women right now that across the country are tackling CPS.
We wrote and drafted my co-founder, Maureen Steele, brilliant constitutional expert, drafted legislation here in Florida that is ubiquitous for all 50 states.
It only needs to be modified per the state statute, right, to address the issues.
But we've expanded this legislation so that the threshold from which CPS claims that they can go and get your children for whatever reason, it's usually hearsay, is so high now that it will eliminate 95% of the CPS cases.
Now, if you eliminate 95% of the CPS cases, you also have to eliminate 95% of that federal Title IVE funding that comes out of the Social Security Administration under RFK's Health and Human Services Administration.
And by eliminating that kind of funding, Rob, now you're defunding all those parasitic organizations that are working in tandem with the CPS agencies around the country, whether it's Department of Children and Families or Department of Social Services, whatever the acronym is by the state.
You reduce that federal money and boom, the amount of children that are going to get snatched based on a doctor saying, oh, I didn't, you wouldn't take a vitamin K shot for little Johnny when he was three months old, which is totally not a reason to take a child.
There's no law for that.
But that goes on all the time.
And so it's about time that CPS is addressed.
And frankly, I would love nothing more to see CPS completely defunded and allow the local communities to help you because you and I both know if there's a hurricane, a tree falls on your roof, FEMA isn't there first, your neighbor is.
And this is what we have to get back to.
We've lost the idea to relate to one another and facilitate help for one another.
We continually look to the nanny state to basically get the help that we think we need.
And the communities with all the churches and everything, we need to activate the Black Road regimen and get the churches involved, get the different local organizations involved in helping families that are in true crisis.
But the majority of them, no, it's the state interference to do exactly what you said, traffic the children.
It dries up these foster homes that are basically, you know, small businesses almost in terms of holding children, getting money from the government, but they're not necessarily watching these children.
We know the federal government doesn't, when they place them with families of these migrant children, they're just like, well, we're just letting them go.
And then they said like 60,000 calls of abuse were unanswered from this.
I mean, it's criminal.
I'm going to play this clip when we get back after the break, but it's, it's just talking about the Amish.
You're talking about local communities.
The Amish went to North Carolina and they've been building homes for over a year for people, homes and structures without any government assistance, without any type of government oversight or anything.
And what's happening?
Stuff's getting built.
You know, these guys know how to build things.
They can raise a barn in a day and you're seeing that power.
And so I definitely want to, I like to put out at least one clip of what I feel is good news.
I think this is a good news segment as well.
Good news hour, really, just explaining people that there is a curtain in front of people in terms of this digital curtain, how they can go and, hey, we're going to create this system where we can steal from you.
But now you know that there's this system that exists.
Before you didn't know it, most people, I don't think, even knew this existed.
I remember talking about this case with you.
Actually, we covered it on the tail end of the last interview that I think we did with you.
We started talking about a little bit.
Now, boom, we did a deep dive.
And I think we've got a lot of information out there for people to use it themselves.
I think they're phenomenal, absolutely phenomenal.
They provide excellent information.
They're very accessible.
I've spoken to them in the past because I was looking for guidance.
And again, this is not anything new, by the way, Rob.
The super, quote, elite, which I think are really the scum on the bottom of my shoe, frankly, are the ones that really have pioneered all this because you remember the Panama papers.
They were the ones setting up offshore trusts to launder money.
And I'm not suggesting we do that.
I'm suggesting just protect your assets.
So it's not in your name because if somebody sues you, I owe nothing.
And again, these rules, codes, and statutes are designed to do exactly what you just said, create the legal loopholes so that you don't have to do things.
Well, it's up to us to use the same system then and use it to our benefit.
But when you find out that they are creating lies in your name because they just want to bury you because they see you have an asset they want to take and sell, yeah, that's a problem.
It's like all these SEC fines and all these fines.
One of the most important things to me in my life is to get things right and to tell the truth and to be accurate.
That's why they say Alex Shows is right.
But it's not just our news, our prediction, or information that are incredibly accurate.
It's the products.
And out of all the amazing supplements at the Alexholdstore.com, our methylene blue, ultramethylene blue, is the best you're going to find on the market.
It's so good for your body.
Instant, clean, amazing energy.
You owe it to yourself if you sat on the fence to go to the yellow showstore.com right now and get ultramethylene blue.
And believe me, you are going to want to reorder it again.
We have an 84% reorder on that product.
No other supplement anywhere has anything even close.
That is how amazing it is.
Secure your ultra-methylene blue now at theellowshipstore.com and thanks for keeping us on the air.
Brad Marshall with Christian Nonprofit Organization and Disaster Response Group Spokes of Hope says their faith responders line up the work, resources, and material, and the Amish help get the jobs done.
unidentified
And at the end of the week, we've got 15, 20 jobs done, and hopefully about eight or ten home people back in their homes.
Main Street here actually used to be full of about six feet of mud.
I wonder who he's saying who wouldn't have a problem.
That's interesting.
Document show DOJ examining the handling of mortgage fraud investigation into Senator Schiff.
What happened to the last mortgage fraud investigation from Letitia James?
I mean, I had a guest on who's like, 100% she's going to get indicted.
She did get indicted, but it got thrown out.
Dimtards are above the law.
Just remember that.
So if you want to be above the law and engage in mortgage fraud, join the Demtard party and rise into the ranks of race baiting and stealing from the public dole.
And you too can commit mortgage fraud if you're a DemTard.
All right, third hour starting up.
Strap yourselves in.
We got a lot more to cover.
We'll be right back.
I'm going to talk a little bit about the gunman at Mar-a-Lago.
I will return to my editing desk and start working on, or finishing up actually, a video about...
well, I don't want to give it away.
But if you are a member of the VIP club over at thealicejonestore.com, where you pay $30 a month, but you get $40 a month in-store credit, you might find out some interesting things, some interesting deals that are coming your way.
So check that out at thealicejonestore.com forward slash VIP.
Here's an ex-post from Mario Nafal bomb show.
Epstein was under a secret DEA investigation for over five years and nobody knew.
The CIA Broadcasting Service found out a 69-page DEA memo buried in the Epstein file showing he was targeted in a five-year federal investigation into wire transfers tied to illicit drug and or prostitution activities in the U.S. Virgin Islands and New York.
Oh, yes.
Epstein Island and 9-11, whatever street he lived on.
Was it 9-11 Street?
Or that was the house number?
Well, his was 9.
Lutnick's was 11.
The case opened in 2010 and was still active in 2015 and tracked roughly 50 million in suspicious transfers linked to bank accounts in Switzerland, France, the Cayman Islands, and New York.
14 other targets are named in the memo, but fully redacted.
The documents also reveal, I guess those are victims, right?
Those must be victims.
Well, I'll show you the document.
There's a big on the article here from CBS News, New Land Earth, DEA documents.
There's a picture here of the document.
Yeah, look at all those redactions.
Look, those are victims.
Those are victims, okay?
We are protecting the innocent.
The wildest part, the SDNY prosecutor, Southern District of New York prosecutors who arrested Epstein in 2019 said they had no idea the DEA probe even existed.
The document reveals multiple previously unknown investigations with Epstein connections, including ice probes in West Palm Beach, Las Vegas, and Paris, and a separate FRI investigation opened in 2006 that was still active in 2015.
Holy cow, what was this guy not involved in?
Yet, you know, there's nothing to see.
It's a hoax.
Nothing to see.
We have no idea who this guy is.
For all we know, he was just a humble island merchant trying to set up his billionaire pals with young ladies.
Trump predicts Supreme Court will find a way to come to the wrong conclusion on birthright citizenship.
He predicted they will not full and rule in favor of his executive order that directs federal agencies to only recognize babies born to people in the country legally as American citizens.
That's the old anchor baby thing where the Chinese are actually the worst at this.
They fly here when they're nine months pregnant, have the baby, and then they have a citizen.
The baby becomes a citizen, and then they can just work their way in.
So all Trump was saying, here's an executive order.
You have to be, because we have the blood of the law and blood of the soil is what they call it.
You're born here, you become a citizen.
That's the soil.
If your parents are Americans and you're born somewhere else, you're an American.
It's the law of the blood.
And, but what people have been doing is taking the law of the soil, literally going, as long as we get over that demarcation line, whether it's on the West Coast or on the Rio Grande, as long as we get across and have that baby, it's an American citizen.
Then by default, I can become an American citizen and get all the tax subsidies available.
And so Trump said, there it is.
Trump continued.
The next thing you know, they will rule in favor of China and others who are making an absolute fortune on birthright citizenship by saying the 14 Amendment was not written to take care of the babies of slaves as it was proven by the exact timing of its construction, filing, and ratification, which perfectly coincided with the end of the Civil War.
And that's what it was.
The slaves weren't considered citizens.
So what they were saying is now if you're born here and your parents were slaves, you're a citizen.
We're trying to undo some wrongs.
And so what did that turn into?
The Chinaman going, hey, let's go make some citizens.
Chinese birth tourism has flourished for the past 15 years, resulting in at least 750,000 and possibly as many as 1.5 million Chinese who are also American citizens by virtue of being born here and growing towards adulthood in China.
Peter Schweitzer wrote that in the New York Post last month.
Chinese nationals are entitled to vote in any U.S. election of their choosing and move freely within our borders.
Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Jim Jordan of Ohio wrote in a brief to the Supreme Court in the case.
The day he took office in January 2025, Trump issued an executive order designating those only born to parents subject to the jurisdiction of the United States are citizens, quoting the 14th Amendment.
The impact will be children who are born to people who are not legal residents are not U.S. citizens.
I agree with that.
We'll see where it goes.
Supreme Court, Trump says, seems to be controlled by foreign interests.
That's why they said his tariffs were illegal.
Mar-a-Lago gunman Austin Tucker, who has zero social media footprint, 21 years old, slipped through the employee exit.
He was carrying a shotgun and a gas canister, entered the club by slipping through an exit gate as employees were leaving it.
It was revealed.
He was shot and killed by Secret Service agents at President Trump's Seaside Club after he refused to drop his weapon and allegedly raised it to the firing position.
I wonder if there's any video of this.
You would think there's probably video everywhere on Mar-a-Lago, right?
You'd think there'd be some video of this.
And what I'm surprised is that there's no whistleblowing protesters right outside Mar-a-Lago, you know, mourning the life of this kid because they seem to, anytime someone gets shot by the government, they seem to be there mourning that person as a saint and innocent dolphin.
A spokesperson for the Secret Service confirmed that he was entering through there as he tried to leave.
Daily Mail reached to the FBI for comment, who took over the investigation.
Martin was killed at 1.30 p.m. on Sunday at Trump's Resort in Palm Beach, Florida after entering with a gas can and shotgun.
And there's the picture of him.
His parents and family are big Trump supporters.
So they're wondering, you know, why this guy was doing this?
I would say check and see if he's on Discord.
Oh, but there's no social media footprint.
But what you're finding is Discord is being used as sort of like, I would say a honeypot ground or a patsy ground.
They're looking for these patsies, people they can turn some way or another.
They take a little bit of angst and be like, hey, maybe you can drive to Mar-a-Lago with a shotgun and a gas can.
Hey, maybe that's a good idea.
Maybe I'll do that.
So he left his $1.1 million home in Cameron, North Carolina around 1 p.m.
That's not like him at all, they said.
Maybe he got busted doing something online and people will blackmail you.
The 764 group is known to do this to people.
They say they're going to add him doing something nefarious, like spanking the monkey or something, and these people do whatever they want.
Here's another set of good news.
Public storage moving headquarters out of LA.
Public Storage, the world's largest self-storage company, is leaving its Glendale home of more than 50 years and moving its corporate headquarters to Frisco, Texas.
The company operates more than 250 million square feet at 3,500 locations in 40 states.
Also, In-N-Out Burger plans to split its management between Baldwin Park and Nashville.
And let's see.
They're saying Texas has gained 100 companies between 2018 and 2024, while LA, Los Angeles, California, has lost 106.
Public Storage announced the deal to move to a newly constructed building in the Dallas suburb of Frisco at the same time as a staple of new leaders came on board whose CEO, Joe Russell, retires next month.
He'll be replaced by Tom Boyle.
The opportunity ahead for public storage has never been stronger.
I wonder how much they got in tax subsidies from Greg Abbott, who has been known to do that.
He does like to woo companies here with tax subsidies.
The parents of public storage founder W.B. Wayne Hughes fled the Dust Bowl of the Oklahoma 1930s and settled in Al Monte, just east of downtown Los Angeles.
He won a scholarship and was a lifelong supporter of the school, donating over $400 million to USC until he died in 2021.
The billionaire can still be seen in his old jeans hanging out of fast food joints and love the races in Santa Anta.
I always like watching storage wars, watching people open up the open up the storage units and bid on those items and then trying to find stuff and then selling it, keeping the economy moving, bringing back treasures.
Here's another good news story.
Scholar of the far right complains the move from U.S. to Canada to flee Trump has backfired horribly.
The self-proclaimed scholar of the far right was blasted on social media after she fled the United States.
Nope Brigade is an academic researcher who studies conservative and right-wing ideologies and recently fled from the current Trump administration to Vancouver.
Well, that's a nice city, but one of the world's priciest.
Vancouver really is nice, nice-looking city.
It's kind of away from Montreal and where's the other, what's the other big city over there?
Toronto.
Yeah, Toronto is kind of a dung heap.
Brigade posted on social media begging for help after she and her family moved from Los Angeles, only to be hit with an even worse affordability crisis.
For those who don't know, the housing crisis here is way worse than like in the U.S., she said.
I've lived in L.A. for six years and I haven't faced rent as bad here.
She explained she, her partner, and their pets moved to Vancouver.
That's their kids, their pets, moved to Vancouver on a visitor visa, which prevents them from working.
Oh, imagine that.
They relocated with savings set aside, but are quickly burning through the funds and struggling to afford the skyrocketing rent.
In Canada, like the cost of living is like way worse here, she said.
Especially when you're shut out of the healthcare system and can't access any of the resources.
Wait, I thought they had free health care.
I thought Canada had free health care.
Why aren't they taking this poor migrant?
And that's understandable because I'm not a citizen of the country.
Oh, really?
Oh, it's understandable in Canada.
Are you serious?
So she understands that she can't get free health care in Canada, but I guarantee you, this lesbian supports free health care.
Nothing against lesbians.
I'm just qualifying her haircut.
This lesbian with a butch haircut probably, I could say with 99% certainty, she is for migrants getting health care here in the United States because healthcare is a right, right?
Healthcare is a right.
Healthcare is a right.
Unless you move from the United States to Canada, then it's understandable that you don't get free health care.
She's bemoaning the situation and she's asking for places to stay.
You know, she wants more than just a room, ideally a free at below market rates.
So most visitors allow stays up to six months and work permits are only granted to those with a temporary resident permit valid for six months or longer, according to the government of Canada.
Yeah, one user wrote on TikTok, ma'am, no matter what happens, please stay there.
Sign the United States of America with the Canadians replying.
You kidding?
We don't want her either.
All I heard was a lot of criticism regarding the places she choose to flee.
And then after the criticism was a request for money, another outraged user wrote.
So there you go.
That's what happens.
The grass is not always greener on the other side.
Let's go to this video.
Speaking of LA, here's a sheriff.
Sacramento Sheriff slams Gavin Newscomb's elderly parole program.
Basically, he's bitching about letting out this pedophile that was literally using the free candy fan to attract children.
I got a phone call from a retired sheriff sergeant who used to work child abuse back in 1995 about this case, David Allen Funston.
He helped investigate it.
He was angry because he read he was being released.
I had no idea about it.
Read the LA Times article, saw what they had spoken, and got the wheels rolling.
So yesterday, they printed out probably thousands of pages arrest reports on Mr. Funston, the cases he did.
And take us back to 1995.
He was out preying on children in the Sacramento area.
We're talking children as young as three to the age of seven, molesting them.
One young girl in North Highlands kidnapped her, molested her very viciously, drove her to Placerville, and kicked her out of the car after punching her.
And in addition, when the FDA was talking about giving it to kids, they're like, well, we have to give it to the kids to see what it does because we're not going to test it on the kids.
We'll just test it in real life.
We'll just give it to everybody.
Give it to all these kids and see what happens.
And we're seeing the fallout from that five years later.
So when he's in the city, he talks about suing people.
And when he's in the country, because CD32 goes from North Dallas all the way almost to the Louisiana border.
So we've got a lot of rural areas.
When he's out in the country, he talks about having a pickup truck and he and his wife have a chicken.
When he's in the city, talks about suing people.
But he's an attorney, and he suddenly has just suddenly, just at warp speed, suddenly has all this money that has flowed in.
And Belletpedia says it's a three-man race between me and him and a man named Ryan Binkley.
And Ryan and I both have, we've made our money.
We can't be bought.
I don't know.
Did the deep state figure here's somebody who's more vulnerable who can be bought?
I don't know how it happened, but I do know that the other people in the race can't be bought.
And, You know, our big problem is people go to Washington and they get seduced by the swamp, right?
We've been betrayed a million times.
People go to Washington, they say the right things on the campaign trail, and they get to Washington and they suddenly become operatives of the deep state.
You know, is it because they're gutless or because they're compromised by the deep state?
Or is it just, you know, hey, I've gotten here and I like the money and the power and Nancy Pelosi said she liked the access to inside trading information.
And suddenly they don't work for the American people anymore.
They work for the deep state.
And that is the number one problem.
And I'll tell you, I'm ticked off.
I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore that we've got these gutless politicians going to Washington and not working for the American people anymore.
I am just so ticked off at these gutless politicians that aren't working for the American people.
Who are they working for?
Are they just working for the deep state?
Big pharma, big food?
I just know that they're not working for the American people.
Our taxes keep going up and we have less and less to show for it.
And I'll tell you, we've got to get back to this right here.
The U.S. Constitution is the founding, obviously, document of our country, and it is the mooring, the mooring of our country.
We've got to get back to this because without this, without adherence to the U.S. Constitution, we are just plastic bags blowing in the wind.
And a lot of countries have constitutions.
A lot of people don't know.
Russia has a constitution surprisingly like ours, but obviously they don't adhere to it.
And they've got a strongman dictator that runs the place.
We have people that go to Washington and they put their hand on the Bible and they swear to stand up for the Constitution.
And damn it, then they don't do it.
They don't do it.
Less than 42% of Democrats, according to the JBS Freedom Index, actually adhere to the Constitution on important constitutional votes.
And there are a lot of Republicans that are under 50% on the JBS Freedom Index.
Now, people that we like, like Senator Ted Cruz, they're very, very high on that freedom index.
They adhere to the Constitution, but we've got so many people that don't.
And I'm just ticked off.
I am mad at people that go to Washington and they ignore the Constitution and they ignore the American people and they go to work for the deep state.
It looks like we have a looming war with Iran or at least some sort of military incursion with our Air Force and Navy being ramped up in that area.
I think over half our Air Force is there now.
Do you see Iran as a threat to the United States?
Or do you do you side like right now?
It looks like Israel wants us to bomb Iran to be part of their operation.
And we can debate whether that's a good thing or a bad thing.
But do you think initially we should be involved in a conflict in the Middle East, which could end up like the same thing what we had with Iraq and Afghanistan, where we're mired in there for years.
And people don't realize that that's what he's doing half the time.
The Europeans don't get it yet.
I'm not asking to pick a side in the Russian-Ukrainian war, but do you see a path for peace in Russia and Ukraine?
And do you agree that it's going to include Ukraine losing some land?
It looks like what Russia is doing now is setting up sort of a dmz, because they've kind of stopped advancing and they're just kind of fortifying an area, you know, in the Donbos region.
Uh, are you for something like that, if that's a pea, if that's, if that's key to a peace deal?
You know, first off uh, kudos to Ukraine the, the Ukrainian people fighting valiantly.
I mean when, when Russia invaded you know you, and I probably thought it was about a two-month deal right, that Russia would just sweep across the Ukraine, talk about a tremendous, I mean one of the tremendous military successes in history.
Is Ukraine, little Ukraine, fighting off the, the Russian war machine?
Um, that's a.
I mean, that's another thing, that that is not our fight.
It's not our fight.
Uh, support the Ukraine people um, going to privately make donations to Ukraine, but uh, that's not our fight.
Is it very likely that Ukraine needs to give up some of their territory for a lasting peace?
I'd say it's probably um, that's probably the best deal that they can get.
I mean again, they're negotiating from position of weakness.
They're position uh, positioned against a, a formidable military force that outnumbers them and can just keep throwing uh money and bodies at the war and and Ukraine can't.
So I think it's time for Ukraine to realize where their bargaining position is, what is a reasonable uh solution and get a solution done, and and in this, this very, very long war.
But but wow, the Ukrainian people fighting like like we've we've seldom seen in The history of warfare and uh, kudos to Ukraine for what they have done in this war.
I I think uh, that European countries probably can uh can withstand anything but.
But obviously we would stand with our European allies if anything like that happened.
And thanks to president Trump again uh, we've seen the NATO alliance start to uh put more money into their defense.
They can't count on, you know, big daddy U.s doing the job anymore.
They've got to take care of their own defense.
And uh, very delighted, And I mean, one of many things that I've loved about President Trump's second term is him forcing the Europeans to honor their commitments to NATO.
And again, he's not forcing them to do any special thing.
He's just encouraging them, gently, sweetly, encouraging them to honor their damn commitments that they've made to the NATO alliance to step up their defense budgets.
This has been, I think Trump thought it was going to go away in two weeks.
It's not.
In fact, it seems to be growing more and more.
We just found out that he was under a DEA investigation for the last, you know, from 2010 to 2015.
It was just some memo, a 60-page memo they found with the DEA.
He was also under FBI investigation that were active up until 215, 2015.
Do you support what some representatives are claiming they're going to do is go in and actually read unredacted names and like, you know, put some of this out there, people who weren't victims, but people who are, you know, perpetrators who I think deserve accountability.
What's your view on that of congressmen kind of taking the law into their own hands and just putting the names out there, you know, going behind the federal government?
So when this district was a minus 31 for Republicans, I ran two years ago.
We actually knocked eight points off the Democrats' lead in CD32.
We probably put it on the Texas legislature's radar.
If we would have underperformed by nine points, it would have been minus 40.
Legislature probably wouldn't even have looked at CD32.
Because we turned it into minus 23, they looked at it and said, ah, you know, maybe that is winnable.
So yes, CD32 is one of the five districts that have been redrawn to be stronger Republican, and now it's gone from minus 23 to a plus 18.
So this can be a very, very strong Republican seat.
So I ran two years ago when it was a suicide mission just to try to, you know, chisel away at the Democrats' lead.
But I've lived in this district for 20 years.
I've built a business in this district.
I've raised my kids in this district.
So CD32 is near and dear to my heart.
That's why I'm running.
I'm not going to run in any other district.
I'm not going to run in some district that I don't live in.
And that's kind of funny because two of the people that have gotten the out-of-state PAC money and Deep State Jace that I mentioned earlier is one of them doesn't even live in the damn district, doesn't live in the district, lives an hour outside the district.
And now he's getting out-of-state PAC money.
So somebody who doesn't live in the district is getting money from Virginia PACS, from getting money from the deep state for a race that, I mean, why doesn't he run in his own district?
I mean, deep state Jace is very troubling to me because as I mentioned earlier, our big problem is people getting to DC and being corrupted by the swamp, being corrupted by the deep state.
And now you've got somebody who's already been bought and paid for by the deep state.