| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
This is what Islamic Republic wants me to be. | |
| This is what Taliban and ISIS wants us to be. | ||
| And this is my true self. | ||
| In Iran, I was told, if I take off my hijab, I'll be hanged with my hair by God. | ||
| 26-year-old Irfan Sultani is staring down the barrel of Iran's brutal hanging machine scheduled for January 14th, 2026, in what appears to be the regime's first public execution tied to the raging anti-Khomeini uprising that's been torching the streets since late December. | ||
| I have to emphasize that among Iranian people, Trump is the most popular person right now. | ||
| He has so much popularity because of the steps that he took toward preventing the growth of terrorism in the Middle East. | ||
| They respect him. | ||
| The internet blackout in Iran continues, making it difficult for people to get new information, although international calls were briefly going through overnight. | ||
| Sultani was arrested on January 8th during the protests and was slammed with a death penalty charge of waging war against God. | ||
| The charge that the Islamic Republic loves to slap on anyone daring to demand freedom. | ||
| He was charged as a ringleader and has been sentenced to death. | ||
| His death sentence is on Wednesday, the 14th of January, and he's scheduled to be executed by public hanging. | ||
| Yes, he is going to be hanged from a crane for protesting against the regime. | ||
| Believe it or not, there is something that you can do to stop it. | ||
| This is not a new or experimental tactic. | ||
| This is a tried and true tactic known to the Iranian diaspora, which we've been doing for many, many years and has almost always worked. | ||
| The way to save his life is to make him famous. | ||
| No lawyer, no real trial, no appeal, just a lightning-fast kangaroo court verdict. | ||
| His family was granted a pathetic 10-minute final farewell visit, and now the noose awaits as the first warning shot to terrorize the masses into silence amid a total communications blackout and reports of as many as 12,000 killed and roughly 20,000 arrested, according to the Human Rights Activist News Agency. | ||
|
unidentified
|
12,000 Iranians were just murdered by the Islamic regime in the past 72 hours. | |
| 12,000. | ||
| That's more than twice the amount of American soldiers killed in the entire Iraq war. | ||
| If that's not alarming to you, then I don't know what is. | ||
| And this is what's getting them killed. | ||
| Simply supporting a man who wants nothing but secular democracy for Iran. | ||
| Otherwise known as freedom of speech, a right all humans should be naturally entitled to. | ||
| These courageous individuals are willingly walking out, staring down evil directly in the face while stepping into pools of blood of their fallen brothers and sisters, and yet still refusing to stand down. | ||
| This isn't some fleeting spark over bread prices. | ||
| It's the powder keg finally detonating after years of engineered economic collapse. | ||
| The real in free fall thanks to sanctions, unrelenting corruption, and that disastrous 12-day war with Israel last summer that left the nuclear program in ruins and the treasury bleeding dry. | ||
| But here's the real horror show. | ||
| The regime's goons are mowing down unarmed civilians with live ammo. | ||
| Bodies are stacking up in morgues and hospitals under a total internet blackout designed to hide the slaughter. | ||
| John Bowne reporting for InfoWars. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| Good morning, everyone. | ||
| We're excited you're all with us today. | ||
| A lot happening over here. | ||
| To buckle up, we've got a jam-packed three-hour show heading your way in just a few moments. | ||
| Congressman Barry Lautermilk will be joining the program. | ||
| As many of you guys saw yesterday, there were those J6 hearings that officially launched. | ||
| So we've got a lot to ask him on that front. | ||
| He'll be here in about 30 minutes. | ||
| So stay put. | ||
| Also, we'll have Matt Tardy on with us to discuss Iran. | ||
| Obviously, there's more information regarding all of that. | ||
| Plus, you probably saw what happened yesterday in Minnesota. | ||
| President Trump threatening to implement the Insurrection Act. | ||
| So we'll get there in just a moment. | ||
| A lot more happening here. | ||
| We will also have Georgia Senator Colton Moore on the program, Logan Washburn, and Bo French. | ||
| So buckle up. | ||
| You got three hours of just jam-packed news stories coming your way. | ||
| A lot more to discuss. | ||
| Stay put. | ||
| Here we go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello. | |
| Good morning and welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| A lot happening. | ||
| I'm just going to go. | ||
| We're excited that you're all buckling up with us for the next three hours because we got quite the big show heading your way. | ||
| As many of you guys probably saw yesterday, there were the J6 hearings going on. | ||
| And it was eventful, obviously. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| It was a repeat of everything we've kind of already known. | ||
| But I've got a lot of questions, though, for the chairman of that committee, Barry Lautermilk, who's going to be joining us in just a few moments, about 25 minutes from now, because I've got a lot I want to discuss with him. | ||
| Obviously, the rogue prosecutors, they need to be held accountable. | ||
| The FBI agents that were there that day. | ||
| He called that out. | ||
| And it was interesting. | ||
| It was interesting to see. | ||
| Also, Jamie Raskin, as many of you guys know, he's the individual who was on the last J6 committee. | ||
| Well, he is still defending the work that was done by the previous committee, even though they deleted everything and they're trying to cover up everything and they lied to the American people. | ||
| He still is covering for that. | ||
| So we'll have Lautermilk on to discuss that. | ||
| Plus, we'll be also discussing President Trump, who is apparently going to be potentially, I guess the exact words are instituting potentially the Insurrection Act. | ||
| It's another threat being made by the President of the United States for those who are carrying out massive protests in Minnesota. | ||
| So we'll keep our eye on that. | ||
| Matt Tardy will react to that. | ||
| Also, be joined by Georgia's senator, Colton Moore, in a little bit as well. | ||
| Colton Moore is really excited about a piece of legislation that he's pushed through to protect the Second Amendment in Georgia, and it's about to be signed into law. | ||
| So he'll be joining us to react to that. | ||
| Plus, we'll also be joined by Logan Washburn, who's working on a story in Dallas, Texas. | ||
| And it's an interesting story because it has to do with something that you've heard a lot about recently, the 764 group. | ||
| And Logan Washburn is going to break down his latest report and what he's learning about this and the most recent arrest. | ||
| We'll also be discussing how Americans just really don't like Islam. | ||
| How do I know this? | ||
| Well, the vast majority actually don't. | ||
| I know a lot of people tend to think that that might not be the case, but there's a new Ras Mussen report poll that was just released moments ago. | ||
| And ultimately, it says 77% of voters are concerned about the influence of radical Islam in America, while 63% of U.S. voters oppose Muslims establishing their own communities here in the United States. | ||
| So apparently the fringe movement is mainstream. | ||
| I mean, most Americans agree with us on this front. | ||
| Bo French is running for office. | ||
| He's running for the Texas Railroad Commissioner. | ||
| He's also a very loud patriot. | ||
| Many of you probably seen him on X. He's going to be joining us in a bit to discuss that as well. | ||
| That will be in about two hours. | ||
| So we've got a lot to discuss. | ||
| Let's sign off on. | ||
| If you, let's, let's talk a little bit about what President Trump's up to right now. | ||
| At 11 a.m. Eastern Time, he'll be getting his intelligence briefing. | ||
| If there's anything that goes live, I'll bring that to you. | ||
| Then at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Time, he's actually going to be meeting with the woman who was apparently elected to lead in Venezuela, Maria Machado. | ||
| He's expected to have lunch with her at 12.30 p.m. Eastern Time today. | ||
| And then after that, around like 4 p.m., President Trump will be participating in the 2025 Stanley Cup Championship appearance at the White House, which is the Florida Panthers. | ||
| They'll be making their appearance over the White House in a moment as well. | ||
| So that's what the president has on his agenda for today. | ||
| Probably should buckle up because I think there's going to be a lot happening on the front of, let's just say, the Insurrection Act. | ||
| President Trump posted this on Truth Social moments ago. | ||
| And it's quite interesting, the post. | ||
| He's ultimately saying that they're trying to institutionalize or institute the Insurrection Act potentially if the lawmakers in Minnesota don't get their act together. | ||
| So that's what the president's saying. | ||
| That's his message right now. | ||
| And obviously, folks, if you saw it unraveled yesterday in Minnesota, you would probably want more of an aggressive take from the president. | ||
| Now, what happened yesterday? | ||
| Well, there was a shooting that took place. | ||
| And obviously, a lot of people are fired up about this. | ||
| People who are ignorant don't understand how things work. | ||
| DHS says that a federal law enforcement officer conducted a traffic stop in Minneapolis on a Venezuelan national, an illegal living in here in the United States. | ||
| Now, according to details that they've sent over, get late last night. | ||
| It's quite the interesting, we have that tweet actually. | ||
| It's quite the interesting details that they're sending our way. | ||
| Specifically, the suspect apparently fled when these agents made contact with him. | ||
| They fled on foot. | ||
| The officers pursued him when they caught up with him. | ||
| He apparently was resisting arrest, became very violent towards the officer, striking the officer. | ||
| And then apparently two other people, in addition to the one who was being apprehended, came out and struck the officer with the snow shovel and a broom handle. | ||
| Again, these are people brainwashed by the corporate media to think that there's something going on here that shouldn't be taking place. | ||
| Obviously, these are law enforcement officers who are now being assaulted on the regular basis. | ||
| All three suspects fled back into an apartment, barricaded themselves inside. | ||
| The assaulted federal officer and the injured suspects were taken. | ||
| This is after one was shot, obviously. | ||
| So obviously the officer has to shoot, right? | ||
| Because you're hitting him in the head with the shovel. | ||
| It's three against one. | ||
| His life is at risk. | ||
| Very apparent because you're assaulting him. | ||
| You're trying to knock him out unconscious or else you wouldn't be hitting him in the head with the shovel. | ||
| He is a law enforcement officer who has a gun on his waist. | ||
| God forbid, if he loses consciousness for a couple of seconds, you could then take his firearm, shoot him and kill him. | ||
| So yeah, it's reasonable to open fire first at that point. | ||
| A conglomerate of three morons come together to attack a federal agent. | ||
| Then that federal agent defends himself and shoots, open fire, shoots the suspect who was assaulting him. | ||
| And if you're in Minnesota, you saw protests get really, really kind of crazy last night because of it. | ||
| It's just, we've got to stop. | ||
| Is why, first off, this is why the Biden regime intentionally implemented shuffled in and imported low IQ people because they're the people who are sitting here saying, Oh, this is all justifiable. | ||
| It's not justifiable, obviously. | ||
| You can't sit there and take a shuffle and hit a federal agent over the head and not expect him to react. | ||
| We literally are living with the stupidest human beings on the face of this earth. | ||
| I mean, that's what's going on in this country right now. | ||
| And we're pretending like their opinions actually matter. | ||
| Their opinions don't matter. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because they're low IQ people. | ||
| Now, yesterday, Nick Sortor posted a video and allegedly shows rioters stealing which appears to be a rifle. | ||
| And according to his report, this is a car that is a federal-owned car. | ||
| I don't know what agency it is. | ||
| You effing morons. | ||
| By the way, guy with a face tattoo probably can't legally own a gun. | ||
| But they all start stealing, obviously. | ||
| Why not? | ||
| Why not? | ||
| It wasn't just that. | ||
| They didn't just steal, you know, a rifle and a couple of other things. | ||
| They also took a lot of key documents, which may have said a lot of very important government-sensitive information. | ||
| So it's interesting to see if the president is threatening to implement the Insurrection Act. | ||
| I'd say he could probably go with it at this point. | ||
| Go with this at this point. | ||
| These are terrorists who are taking over, folks. | ||
| These are people who are literally out there trying to kill federal agents for carrying out and following, obviously, immigration laws. | ||
| So no. | ||
| No. | ||
| I'd say, let's be done with the threats. | ||
| Let's actually go out there and start knocking some heads. | ||
| Now, it's interesting because when you listen to these people, and again, this is why I keep calling them low IQ because they're not very intelligent. | ||
| When you listen to these people, when you put a microphone in front of their faces and you say, why are you here tonight? | ||
| Well, you get a whole bunch of lies. | ||
| But I actually don't even think a lot of them are actually doing the lying. | ||
| I think that they've been lied to themselves. | ||
| And so you're going to hear in clip one, a protester just spew a whole bunch of nonsense on CNN last night. | ||
| Take a listen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, from my house, like where I live in my apartment, they come in without warrants, without official anything. | |
| They just come in and barge into people's houses, gunned, armed up with no one being spoke to or anything, masked up. | ||
| This is kidnapping and everything above. | ||
| That is not okay. | ||
| What does it feel like, you know, when you wake up in the morning? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you scared? | |
| Are you anxious? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I am very scared. | |
| I'm worried that I'm not even able to go to school to feel safe. | ||
| And just walking outside my building or even walking outside my front door before heading outside the building is very scary. | ||
| Like, I can't go to school without feeling worried that I'm going to be taken at any moment and any second in my life. | ||
| What kind of impact do you think that you can make as an individual here? | ||
|
unidentified
|
To be honest, I'm not sure, but speaking up to the people who cannot speak up and showing that unsupported, not supporting what's going on right now. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Listen, she shouldn't be blaming those ISI agents for not wanting to go to school. | ||
| She's clearly uneducated. | ||
| She clearly needs to be there. | ||
| What are you afraid of, girl? | ||
| Are you an illegal alien? | ||
| Are you not supposed to be here? | ||
| CNN loves sitting here and playing this victimhood card. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I just, I'm over it. | |
| I'm over it. | ||
| Done. | ||
| You have to be a moron to believe that. | ||
| If they're just showing up, breaking into homes, grabbing people in the middle of the night. | ||
| You know, they're grabbing pedophiles, murderers, rapists. | ||
| It's interesting to sit back and watch, though, what's unraveling right now in Minnesota. | ||
| I just can't believe we have people in this country that are this stupid. | ||
| I think that's the real depressing part in all of this, right? | ||
| Is the having to understand that these people are just low-IQ human beings who we don't know how they got into this country in the first place. | ||
| But most importantly, we know. | ||
| But most importantly, these people are trying to destroy this country. | ||
| They're doing their very best to do just that. | ||
| And then you have the morons who work within our federal government who actually align with their views on all of this. | ||
| You know, yesterday we talked about a story about how six prosecutors were really infuriated about the failure. | ||
| This is how they view it: the failure of the DOJ to go out there and investigate whether the ICE agent violated the rights of Renee Goode when he was defending his life. | ||
| You know, that same ICE agent, by the way, who was hit by her vehicle, that she decided to hit the gas and go right into him. | ||
| And whether you think it's a debatable topic, whether he was hit or not, well, now we know he was actually suffering from internal bleeding, according to officials. | ||
| So the civil rights division over at the DOJ, not happy that they weren't able to investigate this ICE agent who is obviously defending his life, but they're looking, maybe can we get hit him with some civil rights violation charges, which is obviously very vague intentionally. | ||
| And it's meant to instill fear into these agents' heads so that when they do come against someone like Renee Goode again, they don't think, let me protect myself, let me fend for myself. | ||
| No, that's what they don't want you doing. | ||
| They want these people killed. | ||
| That's what they're doing here. | ||
| When an ICE agent is hit by a car, they don't care. | ||
| They cheer. | ||
| They love it. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because we're dealing with demons in this country. | ||
| Actual demons. | ||
| So over at the DOJ, the Civil Rights Division, they're not very happy. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Well, they're not happy because Pam Bonnie won't let them go after that ICE agent and try to ruin his life by opening up a BS civil rights investigation. | ||
| And so as a result of all of that, six prosecutors have resigned, which I think is a massive win for the administration. | ||
| Now, in clip two, Pam Bonnie details specifically what all this is about. | ||
| Take a listen. | ||
| Move on to Minnesota. | ||
| You have multiple employees now that have resigned. | ||
| They didn't like the fact that there's an investigation into some of these groups. | ||
| We call it astroturfing. | ||
| There are different groups, even crowds that you can purchase, believe it or not, which is insane. | ||
| And they didn't want to be a part of this. | ||
| And you need to get to the bottom of is who might be financing the instances that would be putting ICE agents' lives in jeopardy. | ||
| Isn't that legitimate? | ||
| That seems legitimate to me, especially in light of an 8,000% increase in the threat level and a 1,300% increase in attacks against these guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Sean, we support Secretary Noam. | ||
| We support our men and women of Homeland Security and ICE, who are out there taking predators off the street every day around the country, and they're doing it in Minnesota. | ||
| What happened in Minnesota? | ||
| We had six prosecutors who suddenly decided they didn't want to support the men and women in ICE. | ||
| One of them was busy doing a photo shoot with the New York Times while ICE was out there risking their lives. | ||
| So they came, they said, we want to resign, but we want to use our annual leave up until April, meaning they wanted the taxpayers to pay for them to go on vacation because they decided they didn't want to support law enforcement. | ||
| So the breaking news tonight, I fired them all. | ||
| They're fired from the office. | ||
| And our U.S. attorney there, Rosen, he's great. | ||
| He was just confirmed three months ago. | ||
| So he has his hands full. | ||
| And that's what we're facing around the country, the deep state in many of these offices. | ||
| And we learned these people had been out there interviewing at liberal law firms prior to this, but I'll tell you what, from a personnel level, that'd be an HR nightmare. | ||
| So people better look into them. | ||
| One of them actually in 2022 defended BLM when they burned down a pawn shop and someone was murdered. | ||
| Yeah, they want to be part of the resistance. | ||
| Yeah, bring it on. | ||
| They're not going to be working for Donald Trump and the Department of Justice any longer. | ||
| Ah, so they're fired. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good. | |
| Good. | ||
| I'm just so done with all these people, man. | ||
| And good on Pam Body for doing that. | ||
| It's just so ridiculous. | ||
| It's just so ridiculous. | ||
| And that's going to be a heck of a referral, by the way. | ||
| You know, when your former employer goes out there and says, this person's a HR nightmare? | ||
| It's a nice little nugget to sneak in there, of course. | ||
| We found this clip and it's going to give you a good laugh because it gave me a good laugh this morning. | ||
| Clip three. | ||
| You know, there's this one liberal woman. | ||
| And, you know, I'm sorry. | ||
| We can't do voice changes with this one. | ||
| She has a natural screech to her voice. | ||
| And probably why no men will probably want to be around her, but she's out here screaming at ICE agents. | ||
| And it's just, it's so dumb that it's amazing, mainly because of the response of one ICE agent who decided to yell back at her. | ||
| Take a listen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sir, tell me your name. | |
| This is unacceptable. | ||
| Absolutely unacceptable. | ||
| You are all, you should all be ashamed of yourselves. | ||
| This is not appropriate. | ||
| This is my country. | ||
| I'm here legally. | ||
| These people, you never ask for proof. | ||
| You are a bad, evil person. | ||
| You need to be expunged. | ||
| You need to go to another country. | ||
| You need to know what it looks like. | ||
| Instead, you're taking, you're pulling over innocent people, not asking for any ID and just hauling them off. | ||
| You all should be ashamed. | ||
| How do you go home to children, to friends, to family? | ||
| Do you tell them what you do for a living? | ||
| That you arrest people without cause? | ||
| That you just pick them up, put them in a truck? | ||
| Is that what you do? | ||
| Are you, are you proud of yourself for doing this? | ||
| Are you absolutely proud? | ||
| Thank you for calling. | ||
| Thank you for putting the ICE. | ||
| Are you proud of this? | ||
| Are you proud? | ||
| You are an idiot. | ||
| You do not deserve to watch the face of this earth. | ||
| None of you. | ||
| None of you. | ||
| You are fools. | ||
| Yeah, did you hear that? | ||
| You are fools. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| Thank you for calling the ICE hotline. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Yes. | ||
| These people are unbearable. | ||
| They're miserable. | ||
| I just don't think we could share a country with people that don't understand the fact that we have imported the worst of the worst. | ||
| All of our lives are at risk because of all of this. | ||
| And what does it mean? | ||
| Well, it means that we need to get rid of them. | ||
| That's what it means. | ||
| It means that these people need to get shipped out. | ||
| That's what it means. | ||
| Can we really sit here and talk to these people? | ||
| Can we live amongst them? | ||
| I don't think we can. | ||
| I don't think we can. | ||
| It's just a whole new level of stupidity that I think is very, very interesting. | ||
| Very, very interesting. | ||
| I don't want to live amongst these people. | ||
| I'm not sure if you guys do at home, but I could tell you this. | ||
| I'm hitting my max. | ||
| You know, we talk about this all the time and it's like when they're that stupid, when they're that ignorant, when they sit there and feel the need to pull over and start screaming at ICE agents, screaming at federal agents like that. | ||
| What were you doing under Barack Obama? | ||
| You weren't doing any of that. | ||
| You weren't. | ||
| If you're wondering actually who's being swept up in all of this, take a look at the story. | ||
| This was a very interesting story in regards to what ICE is picking up. | ||
| They're picking up the trash. | ||
| They're picking up the trash. | ||
| This individual was arrested in New York. | ||
| His name, Waheed Allah Mohammed, is picked up in Rochester, New York. | ||
| He's an Afghan man who initially did come to the country legally, but then due to the fact that he decided to stab his sister for being a bad Muslim girl. | ||
| You know, obviously we need to do something like that. | ||
| Was stripped of his citizenship or whatever his legal status was. | ||
| And then he was ordered for removal back in 2012. | ||
| So we have a man who is living in our country who stabbed his sister, which is obviously his attempt at an honor killing, by the way, which I was told we don't do in this country. | ||
| We don't have those in this country, but apparently we do. | ||
| Because Mohammed tried to kill his own sister for being a quote, bad Muslim girl. | ||
| Because, you know, she decided that she wanted to dress however she wanted to dress. | ||
| She wanted to go out to nightclubs. | ||
| And he couldn't tolerate that. | ||
| Saying that she was a disgrace to the family. | ||
| And so back in 2009, I don't even know why we let these people out of prison. | ||
| They're animals. | ||
| They're barbarians. | ||
| Toss them into the ocean. | ||
| Let the sharks get at them. | ||
| He was convicted in 20, sorry, 2009 for first-degree attempted murder and first-degree assault. | ||
| He was only sentenced to 10 years in prison. | ||
| And what the heck is wrong with our court systems when a man literally is trying to do an honor killing here in the United States? | ||
| And we say, eh, she didn't die. | ||
| We'll let you get back out there soon. | ||
| Well, thank God ICE picked him up. | ||
| Again, we're hoping that when it comes to that deportation flight, maybe just drop him over the Pacific. | ||
| Don't even bring him back to their country. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because they'll find another way to get here in whenever there's another Democrat in the White House who's allowing these people to fully come into our country without any betting at all. | ||
| So great on ICE for sweeping up this guy, taking out the trash. | ||
| But if you really want to complete the mission, right over the Pacific. | ||
| But this is the type of garbage that's being swept up right now in all of this. | ||
| The people who are sitting there telling you, ah, ICE is crossing a line. | ||
| DHS is crossing a line. | ||
| You know, it's crossing a line, stabbing your sister and saying that she's a bad Muslim and trying to do an honor killing here in the United States. | ||
| That's crossing a line. | ||
| We live in very interesting times though, folks. | ||
| We really, really do. | ||
| I just don't know when we're going to hit rock bottom with these people. | ||
| We all start to realize, all right, are we really going to keep sharing a country with them? | ||
| Because I don't want to. | ||
| I don't want to. | ||
| Right. | ||
| There are Democrats. | ||
| We can have political disagreements, but we're talking about people that want us dead. | ||
| We're talking about people that want us to import more people that want us dead. | ||
| I'm hitting my limit with all of them. | ||
| All right, guys. | ||
| We've got a lot more to discuss in just a bit. | ||
| Congressman Barry Latimel could be joining the program in just a few moments, so stay put. | ||
| Obviously, I started the J6 committee hearing. | ||
| Kicked off. | ||
| We'll talk to him about that. | ||
| We'll also be talking to a great lineup of guests, Matt Tardio joining the show, Georgia Senator Colton Moore also joining the show today. | ||
| Logan Washburn and Bo French joining us. | ||
| I don't know if you saw it. | ||
| Rasmussen Report just put out a new poll. | ||
| And the vast majority of Americans do think Islam is a threat to the United States, most importantly to their way of life. | ||
| We will break down that poll as well in just a moment. | ||
| So buckle up a lot more to discuss. | ||
| In the meantime, though, head on over right now, the alexjonstore.com. | ||
| Our gift to you is you'll receive a free hat with every purchase, no minimum to spend. | ||
| Head on over right now, the alexjonestore.com. | ||
| Claim your free hat when you make a purchase over at the shop. | ||
| Hurry on over right now. | ||
| It's while supplies last. | ||
| Plus, two days remain in that giveaway for that F-250 Ford Raptor and the Black Ford F-250, plus $20,000 in cash over at the AuxjoStore.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello. | |
| Welcome to the American Journal Work Citing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're all on board with us today. | |
| Let's return to the chairman of that J6 committee we've been talking about, Mr. Barry Lauterman, who's joining the program today. | ||
| We're excited to have him on the show. | ||
| But let's give you some overview because yesterday was the first hearing for that new Republican-led House Select Subcommittee on January 6th. | ||
| Now, many of us, well, we've got a lot of questions that we're looking for answers to, and that is the goal of all of this. | ||
| Now, Laudermilk did some grilling yesterday in regards to the FBI agents, the individuals that were there that day, because, well, a lot of us want to know exactly what their roles were on January 6th. | ||
| Now, Congressman Lautermilk did grill an individual who worked for the DOJ, who spent about 17 years over at the DOJ, Michael Roman, about all of this. | ||
| Take a listen. | ||
| Over 100 FBI agents were put, deployed as crowd control, which is something that they're really not supposed to do, according to after-action reports that we've read. | ||
| That apparently was never made public during the trials. | ||
| Did you ever have an FBI agent, one of those agents there, testify on behalf of the defense or the prosecution? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I had FBI agents testify. | |
| Typically, they were case agents who were part of the investigative team. | ||
| These agents would have been witnesses. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, no. | |
| Because they were in the crowd, but nobody knew they were in the crowd. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The witnesses who testified in my cases were typically Capitol Police and MPD officers. | |
| Okay. | ||
| What I'm getting at is why would they be someone who could be compelled to testify as a witness had it been known that they were there witnessing some of this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
If they were used for crowd control, I'd be scared of it. | |
| If they were inside the Capitol when things were going on, would they not be a witness either for defense or prosecution? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's possible. | |
| And if the FBI held that back, that they were there, is that not withholding evidence that could be exculpatory? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I would struggle to think how it's exculpatory. | |
| Most things in the Capitol were recorded by cameras, which we produced. | ||
| But there are plenty of areas that are not covered by cameras. | ||
| I've watched most of the footage. | ||
| There's a lot there. | ||
| There's a lot there. | ||
| Number one, the DOJ did a lot of just evil things to these defendants, mainly dumping a bunch of evidence on them to the very like final hours before their trials began. | ||
| And the judges obviously allowing that to fly by. | ||
| But there were so many things that took place to so many of these J-6 defendants that needs to be called out. | ||
| So joining me now to discuss is Chairman Lautermilk. | ||
| He did an incredible job yesterday at the hearing, and we are excited to have him on the program today. | ||
| Welcome back, my friend. | ||
| It's exciting to have you back on the show. | ||
| You know, you have a lot going on over there over at your subcommittee right now. | ||
| So we know you got your work cut out for you, but you did a great job yesterday at grilling him on something that I think is very, very important. | ||
| And specifically, it's how J-6ers were treated during their criminal trials. | ||
| A lot of them weren't given the evidence that they needed, or they were given it to the very last moments before their trials actually began. | ||
| And it became very overwhelming for them, but they didn't know the role of the FBI and the agents that were there that day, what actually played. | ||
| And I think that's something that's also a really key element to all of this. | ||
| What did you learn from yesterday's hearing? | ||
| What are you continuing to learn? | ||
| We're learning that there are so many layers of this onion of January 6th that we just have to keep peeling back layer by layer if we're going to get to the truth. | ||
| And that's really what we want to get to. | ||
| But What I was getting at with Mr. Romano is that the statute says that even if there's the potential of exculpatory evidence, that those witnesses have to be allowed. | ||
| And what we have learned since the DOJ has admitted that they deployed, I think it was 147 agents. | ||
| Now, these are FBI agents. | ||
| They are not your typical law enforcement that does crowd control. | ||
| They do not have the equipment. | ||
| They're wearing their suits, right? | ||
| The DOJ had actually used them for that purpose during the earlier riots, the BLM riots that were in D.C. | ||
| And the agents kind of stood up to them. | ||
| This is not what we're supposed to be used for. | ||
| We're not for crowd control. | ||
| So after action reports that we've read said that, you know, the FBI committed they wouldn't do that again, but then they did it on January 6th. | ||
| You know, things were going on. | ||
| So they deployed these agents and they were in the crowd trying to help, you know, bring peace. | ||
| But the point is they were witnessing a lot of the things that were going on. | ||
| And the fact that the DOJ kept it quiet that they were even there did not allow the defense to call in any of these agents as witnesses, which could have testified on either side, for or against. | ||
| But from some informants that we've had, there were agents who would have liked to testify for the defense on some of these that were being prosecuted because they just trespassed. | ||
| And others, we've got several people that didn't even go in the Capitol that have been convicted on various charges. | ||
| But what I was trying to get across there is how can you do all these prosecutions when the witnesses were held back because the DOJ would not even let the judicial branch know that they were those witnesses there. | ||
| So I think there's a case there that due process was not given to some of these defendants. | ||
| And we need to carefully look at this because the other thing that I think we learned there is that there's a high potential that there was a lot of political influence going on at the Department of Justice as well as within the FBI from the Biden administration on several things, from the FBI's investigation or lack of investigation to the pipe bombs to their aggressiveness going after those that trespassed. | ||
| Yeah, and I think this is all really important that we need to kind of hash these things out because a lot of these key players who, especially at the DOJ, are still actually working for these agencies. | ||
| And it's really, really concerning. | ||
| I want to take your take on this because I know, you know, thankfully the FBI Director Cash Battelle, DHS Secretary Chrissy Noam, they all spoke out at a report that we actually put out on January 6th regarding a woman who didn't even go into the Capitol on January 6th. | ||
| It's really, really unfortunate. | ||
| But Christine Crowder was the woman. | ||
| We actually had her here in studio to talk about her case. | ||
| She was investigated based on a bad tip that was given to the FBI. | ||
| Now, she was investigated for over two years. | ||
| They even put her on a TSA terror watch list, but they didn't have any evidence that she went to the Capitol that day. | ||
| It was a bad photo that they used of another woman claiming to be her. | ||
| But Crowder is, and it's devastating, but she is also like partially paralyzed. | ||
| I don't know how else to say it, but she's partially paralyzed on the left side of her body. | ||
| So she's unable to lift her left arm up. | ||
| This would be something that the FBI, if they would have just quickly went over to talk to her, would have noticed. | ||
| They would have noticed also that she has a little bit of a different walk. | ||
| So they would have known that that wasn't her and the images that were being pushed. | ||
| But to get to the core of all of this, over at the DOJ, there's an individual named Kenneth Corder, who was the senior counsel of the Capitol Siege section. | ||
| And this is what's really concerning because he actually moved Crowder over to be prosecuted. | ||
| This is the email that I've obtained where he's directing those at the DOJ to put her in a folder to be prosecuted later, even though they had no evidence that she actually entered the Capitol that day. | ||
| Now, Congressman, I wanted to ask you about this because, you know, Kenneth Corder still works over at the DOJ. | ||
| And I'm told by sources, once we put up this email, so many people at the DOJ kept calling me saying, Don't let up on this, Brianna, because this individual was the one who was going after all these J-Sixers with very limited pieces of evidence, a lot of ethical-related questions. | ||
| But he's still at the DOJ right now. | ||
| Are you concerned that Kenneth Corder, who is still employed by the DOJ, shouldn't be there in the first place? | ||
| It's just not there. | ||
| I think that there are people within the federal government in a broad spectrum that we have to identify who these bad players are, and we need to get them out of there. | ||
| We've got a situation right now, Brianna, that I've never seen in this country before. | ||
| I mean, my father's a World War II veteran, a combat veteran, who's a medic. | ||
| I grew up in a very patriotic family, a strong Christian household, brought up on strong morals. | ||
| And one of those is that our government is the greatest government in the history of the world. | ||
| It's a nation to be proud of. | ||
| And we've gotten to a place because of things like this that Americans are not proud of their government anymore as much as they're scared of it. | ||
| And we need to shift that back to give the American people something to be proud of in their country, not scared of their government. | ||
| And, you know, Thomas Jefferson said that when the people fear their government, there's tyranny, but when the government fears the people, there's liberty. | ||
| And we have to have more accountability. | ||
| And that's why committees like the one I'm leading now and the one I led in the last Congress are so important. | ||
| And Congress has to restructure the way that we do oversight and investigation. | ||
| And that's one thing that I've been very proud of: I've had some of the media say that we've rewritten the book on how to do oversight and investigation. | ||
| It's not just having a hearing here and there and then write a report and move on. | ||
| It's sticking with it and getting to the truth, exposing the truth, and then working with the administration to hold people accountable. | ||
| And that's what we're going to do. | ||
| Yeah, well, we look forward to that because it's really frustrating to hear these key people are still in positions of power. | ||
| And, you know, we need to get back to being able to trust the DOJ, the FBI. | ||
| And I know they have their work cut out for them, but we look forward to continuing to talk about that. | ||
| But speaking of that and holding people accountable, you know, Jamie Raskin is obviously an individual who we've been very critical over the years in regards to how he was, you know, operating under the J6 committee previously. | ||
| But he laid out something that I thought was quite strange yesterday during the hearing. | ||
| Take a listen. | ||
| Nobody's laid a glove on a single sentence in the report of the January 6th Select Committee. | ||
| Not one. | ||
| And I defy anyone to challenge that statement. | ||
| I would love to see someone show how anything we have found has been contradicted. | ||
| Okay, so I'm going to give this one to you, Chairman, because he's looking for a challenge. | ||
| Do you challenge that claim? | ||
| Because I'd say a lot of people would probably push back on that a little bit. | ||
| We don't have enough time to go through all of what we have just uncovered that were absolute lies or misrepresentation in their committee report. | ||
| And I brought some of those up in my closing yesterday. | ||
| I mean, one that was personal was their attack against me claiming that I was part of the insurrection by giving reconnaissance tours the day before, which was merely a family with small children and some of their guests that came to visit me in my office. | ||
| And I took them to lunch at the public cafeteria. | ||
| And they never went in the Capitol. | ||
| They just stayed in the office buildings. | ||
| And somehow that became very suspicious. | ||
| And they launched a full investigation. | ||
| But the issue was when I took over the committee in the last Congress, I received all of the evidence that they had obtained on these people from Georgia. | ||
| Most of them have never been to Washington, D.C. before. | ||
| They were here as visitors. | ||
| They subpoenaed them. | ||
| They took their phone records. | ||
| They took emails and videos and pictures off of their phones. | ||
| They even called some of them in for depositions. | ||
| But what they learned is there was nothing to their accusation. | ||
| But that was a month before they made the accusation. | ||
| You see, they knew that there was nothing to it. | ||
| They still made the accusation because it fit well within their predetermined narrative. | ||
| And I mean, this thing was personal because we ended up getting 200 death threats within a few days of that. | ||
| They labeled me as a traitor to the country. | ||
| I mean, this is how relentless and ruthless this committee was. | ||
| The Capitol Police took the same evidence and the same video footage. | ||
| They looked at it and said, there's not even anything close to being suspicious here. | ||
| There is nothing here. | ||
| But still, of course, the mainstream media ran with it. | ||
| We had Mr. Askin's claim in the committee room that Donald Trump refused to send the Department of Defense. | ||
| We've blown that sky high several times, and I was able to close with that. | ||
| No, we have the evidence, even from General Milley himself, that Donald Trump ordered the National Guard to be deployed on January 3rd. | ||
| He sent the order to, he basically delegated that responsibility to the Department of Defense and gave them the authority to send whatever resources they needed to keep the people safe on January 6th. | ||
| Several things in their report were refuted even in the committee hearing yesterday. | ||
| But here's the thing about the Democrats. | ||
| They are so good at telling a lie, and they just continue doing it over and over and over again. | ||
| And in the past, they've been better at telling lies, and we have been telling the truth, but we need to do the same thing with the truth. | ||
| Just continue to put it out there and make them defend it. | ||
| And so that was kind of flabbergasted that he made that statement, especially as we were sitting in the room shooting holes through their report left and right, but they still will stand knowing that there's so much false in their report that they would still make that statement. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| It's insane, but it's expected. | ||
| And we're going to play a little bit later in the show a clip of him being confronted yesterday by a reporter. | ||
| And it didn't go too well for him. | ||
| And he did remain silent on that front. | ||
| But before you go, Congressman, because I know you have a lot on your plate these days, I wanted to ask you in regards to Capitol Police, because obviously we're learning more and more about the pipe bomber situation. | ||
| And a lot of Americans want to know, specifically due to the overwhelming evidence of Capitol Police intelligence, what's going on in regards to all of this? | ||
| Are Capitol Police going to be held accountable? | ||
| Because based on what we're hearing, it sounds like that they were well aware and based on the footage too about the pipe bomb that was being placed down, obviously. | ||
| They didn't really act very quickly on it. | ||
| It's all quite strange, but is there any accountability that will come from the police response in regards to the Capitol Police? | ||
| I know also after we had you on the show last time, there's a lot of footage that's now missing from that incident that took place. | ||
| And that's something that we were deeply concerned about. | ||
| So is there any accountability going to be pointed maybe towards Capitol Police in their response that day? | ||
| Depends on what evidence that we pull up. | ||
| I mean, there's so many different elements of the Capitol Police. | ||
| The majority of the frontline officers did their job and they did it honorably that day. | ||
| And there's a lot of intelligence that we're still trying to pull. | ||
| We do believe there's more video out there that we're going to be looking at the videos. | ||
| And there's, you know, we have concerns with every element of law enforcement, whether it's mostly just from is it their incompetence. | ||
| I mean, you have the Secret Service where what they're supposed to have, the best bomb dogs in the world, passed by the device four or five times. | ||
| Either the dog never hit on it or the Secret Service agent never responded to the dog hitting. | ||
| There's so many questions still up in the air. | ||
| I mean, you even have the situation that we're looking at right now of where there was, as one of the members of my committee, I think it was Morgan Griffith from Virginia, he brought up is that when they put the quarantine around the area where the pipe bomb is, it was as porous as our southern border has been, where civilians were just walking around the tape or under the crime scene tape and walking within feet of the pipe bomb and no one was stopping them. | ||
| But on the other hand, there were barricades that were in the building next to it that the Capitol Police Chief had ordered to be brought to the Capitol, but they couldn't get through because of the shutting down the roads and everything. | ||
| So there are so many other incidents that we have to look at. | ||
| And we're going to provide our report. | ||
| And unfortunately, the accountability is not part of the congressional action, especially for executive level branches. | ||
| It is for anything that's in the legislative branch. | ||
| But we're going to get the truth out and we're going to lay it out not only for the powers that be here, but also to the American people. | ||
| And we will push to hold accountable anyone who is involved. | ||
| Yeah, well, we look forward to that. | ||
| And before you go, actually, because it just came to my mind, I wanted to ask about the J6 pipe bomber suspect, the prosecutor that's prosecuting him. | ||
| Obviously, she's someone who a lot of people are deeply concerned about because there's accusations that she was someone who was involved in the, obviously she was the prosecutor for the Prowboys, and there's a lot of misconduct that's been alleged there. | ||
| Are you concerned by who's prosecuting the J6 pipe bomber case currently? | ||
| Do you have faith in them? | ||
| Well, I'm going to defer to Pam Bondi on that one and the Department of Justice, as well as the FBI, is that they're going to follow protocol. | ||
| My greater concern right now is how the defense is trying to align this is this pipe bomber was a MAGA sympathizer and that he was all about Trump when I think what we're hearing from the actual testimony of him and from the FBI is that he was kind of apolitical. | ||
| He was just mad at everybody. | ||
| But the reason that his attorney is trying to make him into this radical Trump supporter is because they're trying to make it where he will receive one of the pardons that he would fit within that pardon window of what President Trump did in his first few days in office. | ||
| And so I think it's probably a smart strategy on behalf of the defense is to make him into this. | ||
| But I think as more and more investigation is done, that'll probably unravel. | ||
| Congressman, we appreciate your hard work on all of this. | ||
| Obviously, you've got your work cut out for you. | ||
| So we appreciate you joining us today. | ||
| So thank you. | ||
| Well, thank you. | ||
| All right, folks. | ||
| Let's play that clip. | ||
| Kara Casanova's done an incredible job at grilling certain members of Congress who maybe think that there's no accountability coming their way. | ||
| She does a great job at confronting them. | ||
| She works for Lindell TV, and she's doing just that in clip 11. | ||
| Take a listen. | ||
| Hi, Mr. Ruskin. | ||
| How are you? | ||
| Fantastic hearing. | ||
| You did a great job spreading the same lies from the first JIS unselect committee. | ||
| Do you care about women that get beaten to death by police? | ||
| Like Roseanne Boylan, did you know that this woman was killed by J6 police? | ||
| This is her picture. | ||
| Do you care? | ||
| Do you not care? | ||
| I guess you figure your pardon, that Autopen pardon, must keep you sleeping at night, sir. | ||
| Sir, do you think that you might go to jail possibly for your J-6 crimes? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you still advocating for civil war conditions? | |
| Or is that over, sir? | ||
| Thanks for the lies, Congressman. | ||
| Keep spreading the propaganda. | ||
| What about Roseanne Boylan that was killed by Capitol Police? | ||
| Ah, folks. | ||
| Folks, they don't like that. | ||
| They don't like it when you hit them with the tough questions. | ||
| I got to say, Kara Casanova, she's a fellow New Yorker, Long Island girl. | ||
| She gets it. | ||
| She doesn't mind confronting these people. | ||
| Jamie Raskin, obviously, yesterday during the hearing was just spewing nothing but lies. | ||
| And there was more of it, too. | ||
| Well, actually, we'll play clip 10 because this gets interesting, right? | ||
| Because he's trying to talk about the pipe bomber too. | ||
| And he's used this whole J6 committee platform to push nothing but lies. | ||
| And it's interesting when he angles this. | ||
| If you remember, under the first J6 committee, he did this whole theatrical performance. | ||
| They sat there and put evidence in front of the evidence, in front of the American people. | ||
| That wasn't actual evidence that would ever make its way into a courtroom because it was factually untrue. | ||
| It was inaccurate. | ||
| It was lies. | ||
| But he did it anyway. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because he wanted to jaint a jury pool. | ||
| But now all of a sudden, Jamie Raskin is telling the American people that we need to hold off because we need to make sure that the J6 pipe bomber suspect, Brian Cole, that his jury pool isn't tainted with poor information. | ||
| Take a listen to clip 10. | ||
| Now, of course, the prosecution of Brian Cole, the pipe bomb suspect, remains ongoing. | ||
| The full facts of the case have not yet emerged. | ||
| And under our criminal justice system, of course, he's presumed innocent until proven guilty. | ||
| And so this hearing is at best premature. | ||
| I hope. | ||
| Certainly, it does nothing to recklessly endanger the prosecution of Mr. Cole. | ||
| But here's what we do know. | ||
| We know that Brian Cole voted for Donald Trump twice. | ||
| We know that in his own words, he was inspired and incited by Donald Trump's big lie, the pathetic lie that the 2020 election had been stolen. | ||
| A lie that has been debunked and repudiated by more than 60 different federal and state court decisions across the land and every court that's looked at it and of course was rejected by the Congress of the United States as well. | ||
| Mr. Cole told investigators he was in D.C. because he was going to protest in support of Donald Trump. | ||
| He told the FBI that he believed the narrative that Trump had spread and if the election was indeed tampered with, quote, someone needs to speak up, right? | ||
| Well, like the thousands of Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol on January 6th, Mr. Cole did something more than just speak up. | ||
| He said what the FBI concluded were viable explosive devices on Capitol Hill, mere feet away from where thousands of people live and work and drop their kids off at daycare. | ||
| It's worth noting that the DOJ hasn't yet actually done an estimate in regards to those viable explosives. | ||
| It's interesting, right? | ||
| Because it's years after everything. | ||
| And when the judge actually asked them in court during one of the most recent hearings for Brian Cole Jr., what would be the estimate for the damage that would have been done if these explosives went off? | ||
| And the DOJ said, we don't know. | ||
| I have a feeling that they're hiding something. | ||
| And obviously with Jamie Raskin pushing that narrative, I could promise you that they are probably hiding something. | ||
| I don't think we're being told the honest truth in regards to the pipe bomber story. | ||
| I still have not been sold that the suspect that they're accusing is the suspect. | ||
| And again, folks, if I am not convinced that the individual that you've just arrested for the J6 pipe bombs is the person, then how the heck are you going to convince a liberal jury that this is the suspect? | ||
| Folks, I don't think that they're getting anywhere with this. | ||
| I also love the fact that Jamie Raskin is trying to germ up the narrative. | ||
| He's a Trump supporter, Trump supporter. | ||
| If you look at his family, if you look at everything, the family said, no, he's not into politics, not his thing. | ||
| And then you have members of a family who are obviously Dems. | ||
| Doesn't make sense. | ||
| Doesn't make sense. | ||
| But I guess they're just hoping that it only makes sense if you're not thinking about it. | ||
| So they're just hoping the rest of us are just going to spoon feed this narrative and just say, all right, we're just going to take it. | ||
| We're just not even going to think about this. | ||
| Again, I think your government's lying to you. | ||
| Surprise, surprise. | ||
| Surprise, surprise. | ||
| Folks, we're going to keep following the story, obviously, as many of you guys saw. | ||
| We're not letting up on this anytime soon. | ||
| Thank you to the chairman, Barry Laudermilk, by the way, for coming on the show and answering these questions. | ||
| Obviously, the question about the DOJ official is a very tough question to have to answer for, given the fact that, yeah, there's a lot of unknown factors in all of this, but boy, are we on to something big? | ||
| We're on to something big. | ||
| All right, folks, in the meantime, head on over to the auxjonestore.com. | ||
| We're giving away a free hat with every purchase. | ||
| No minimum spending required over at the alexjonstore.com. | ||
| Head on over there. | ||
| There's a couple of more hours left in this sale over at the auxjonstore.com. | ||
| And you also have just two days remaining to get those entries in for that F-250 Ford Raptor, the Black Ford F-250 as well, plus $20,000 in cash. | ||
| why not head on over to thealxjonesdoor.com and get a little richer, potentially. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| We're excited you're all jumping on board with us today. | ||
| You've got a jam-packed lineup coming your way today, and we're excited about that. | ||
| Thank you again to the chairman for joining us, Chairman Barry Loudermilk, to discuss what unraveled a little bit yesterday. | ||
| He's got a tight schedule, so we appreciate him making the appearance. | ||
| It is an honor, of course, but we've got more great guests joining the show. | ||
| Matt Tardy will be joining me in just a few moments. | ||
| A lot to talk about with him. | ||
| I was shuffling this morning, getting ready, and I get all the alerts when President Trump puts up a truth social post. | ||
| And so that's the reason why I'm like the first one to get it up on X as well, is because I'm glued to my phone for that. | ||
| And I got the alert and was probably reading a little too fast that President Trump, and this was in my head, had just decided to implement the Insurrection Act. | ||
| Now, that's not what really happened. | ||
| He's threatening it. | ||
| But I read it so fast. | ||
| I was like, yes, we got him. | ||
| Not the case, though, folks. | ||
| There was an if. | ||
| I missed the first word in this post. | ||
| But I was a little excited for this one. | ||
| I'll be talking with Matt about that in a little bit. | ||
| We'll also be talking about Iran. | ||
| Obviously, I'm a little skeptical of any information that does trickle out about Iran, just given the fact that we know that there are countries, countries like Israel that are obviously trying to get the U.S. involved over there. | ||
| President Trump made an announcement yesterday, which I think is really, really important, whether it's true or not. | ||
| We'll have to see. | ||
| We're going to get Matt to weigh in on that. | ||
| We're also going to get Matt to weigh in on a U.S. Navy veteran who was arrested and is accused of, after obviously leaving the Navy, he's a government contractor, but he's accused of leaking and stealing classified information regarding Venezuela. | ||
| Now, that is all in regards also to highlight this, the WAPA journalist who had her home ready. | ||
| Now, again, they're not saying that they are directly connected as of yet, but there's a lot of reports out there that are making that connection. | ||
| Pam Bonnie did give a little bit of information in regards to the leaker. | ||
| We'll play her clip. | ||
| She kind of makes a connection in it, but again, it wasn't in the actual criminal complaint. | ||
| So I just want to highlight that point. | ||
| Obviously, as many of you guys know too, I was traveling earlier this week, the Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, and we went over to SpaceX where he announced that we are going to begin utilizing Grok over at the DOW. | ||
| And the AI race gets me a little on edge just because I'm not a technical person. | ||
| I don't like technology as much as, oh, I mean, like I have a smartphone, but that's about it. | ||
| Keep it basic. | ||
| So I'm not really all in on this AI race that the White House keeps spinning. | ||
| We'll ask him about this because it's getting very interesting. | ||
| You know, Pete Hegseth used these specific words. | ||
| It's the AI acceleration strategy. | ||
| And when he said it, I said, I don't know. | ||
| Don't know how I feel about that. | ||
| Also, one of my best friends is Mel Kay. | ||
| And obviously, Mel Kay is not a fan of this AI race. | ||
| And I hear from her quite often on this. | ||
| Phil asked Matt about that. | ||
| We're looking forward to that discussion. | ||
| We'll also be joined again by Georgia Senator Colton Moore in the second hour of the show. | ||
| He's got an incredible bill that is about to be signed into law in Georgia. | ||
| So let's do a victory lab for the Second Amendment. | ||
| And that's why he's going to be joining us. | ||
| We'll also be joined by Logan Washburn in this portion of the show as well, because Logan did an incredible report in regards to an arrest in Dallas. | ||
| And it has all the red flags. | ||
| He's making the connections. | ||
| You're going to want to hear about this one because it has to do with threats being made at DFW area schools because there's a bunch of schools. | ||
| So it's not just one in particular. | ||
| It also has to do with child pornography. | ||
| And they're all linked together. | ||
| Logan's connecting the dots and he's going to join us to break down his latest report on that. | ||
| And the third hour of the show will be joined by a Beau French. | ||
| There's a new Ras Mussin poll that just dropped. | ||
| Apparently, surprise, surprise, the vast majority of Americans are not cool with radical Islam making its way into the United States and then allowing these Muslims to build compounds all across our country. | ||
| Obviously, a lot of people are on edge about that, rightfully so. | ||
| But it's good to see the numbers are on our side officially. | ||
| Because I was told for a very long time that this wasn't a real fear. | ||
| That the majority of Americans don't feel this way. | ||
| Well, good news. | ||
| They do. | ||
| They do. | ||
| So we'll talk about that in a little bit. | ||
| A lot more to talk about too. | ||
| Also, yesterday I offended a lot of people, and that was the reason why I posted a video of me taking a self-driving car. | ||
| It's very controversial. | ||
| If you haven't seen it, go ahead over to my ex page and make sure you check that video out. | ||
| Got all the right people fired up this morning. | ||
| All right, we've got more to discuss in just a few moments. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, buckle up. | ||
| In the meantime, though, make sure you download the app, alexjo dapp.com to stay in touch with us. | ||
| Regardless of wherever we head to next, again, head on over to AlexJodaf.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello. | |
| Watch it live right now at banned.video. | ||
| Now second hour of the program. | ||
| We're excited you're all jumping on board with us today. | ||
| A lot to dive into. | ||
| You know, President Trump is issuing a threat. | ||
| I don't, I don't like threats if we actually don't carry out on these threats. | ||
| And I get it, right? | ||
| He doesn't want to give into the left's narrative that this is tyranny. | ||
| You know, they'll try to spin it. | ||
| But the reality of it is, is right now, Minnesota is under attack. | ||
| We're constantly seeing, they're not protesters. | ||
| They're violent rioters because protests don't need to happen at nighttime, folks. | ||
| You really want your message heard. | ||
| You wouldn't go out there and bash journalists for filming you. | ||
| And you also wouldn't want to do it in the dark. | ||
| Individuals who are taking to the streets in Minnesota, they're not innocent. | ||
| They're not innocent protesters. | ||
| And I would argue that this isn't even protected by the First Amendment. | ||
| Right now, we have President Trump, and I read through it very quickly and missed the first word, which was if. | ||
| I got very excited this morning. | ||
| Unfortunately, that wasn't the case. | ||
| But President Trump is threatening to institute the Insurrection Act. | ||
| And I say we're long past it. | ||
| Let's get this ball rolling, buddy. | ||
| I've got the weekend off. | ||
| I can cover these stories. | ||
| Now, unfortunately, he has not yet done that, but, you know, it's another threat. | ||
| We'll just add it to the list. | ||
| I'm hoping, though, he carries out on this one. | ||
| Joining me to discuss is Matt Tardio. | ||
| He's a veteran, podcast host, and former law enforcement officer. | ||
| He joins us now. | ||
| Matt does a great job over on X2. | ||
| Anger Tab is where you could find him at breaking down a lot of these stories and just, you know, helping us all understand what's going on in the world today. | ||
| So, Matt, it's an honor, of course, to have you back on the program. | ||
| You know, you are a fan favorite. | ||
| When you left the show last time, the callers couldn't stop talking about how great you were. | ||
| So, welcome back, my friend. | ||
| It's exciting to have you on. | ||
| Well, that's awesome. | ||
| Yeah, I know. | ||
| I'm glad. | ||
| I'm glad to be back. | ||
| I am. | ||
| It's always an honor. | ||
| It's always an honor. | ||
| I want to get to this. | ||
| The post that just came a couple of, maybe like two hours ago from the president. | ||
| He's threatening to push for this insurrection act and to implement it. | ||
| I'm kind of over the threats, but you're a nicer guy. | ||
| Where do you go with this one? | ||
| I'm with you. | ||
| It's beyond time to go over it. | ||
| And, you know, I actually pulled up the Insurrection Act and I have it sitting right up over here in front of me so I can clearly read the law out to people and what it says and why it's not crazy for him to actually threaten that. | ||
| And it says the president by using the militia or armed forces or both or by any means shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress in any state any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination or conspiracy if it, and this is the key part here, opposes or obstructs the execution of laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. | ||
| So what do we think is happening over inside the state of Minnesota? | ||
| Well, last night we ended up having one, the situation within itself. | ||
| You had a federal law enforcement officer that's engaged in a vehicle pursuit. | ||
| The suspect crashes his vehicle out and takes off running. | ||
| And then when the federal law enforcement officer goes, tackles the suspect and gets in a struggle with him in order to effect the arrest. | ||
| You have two people emerge from their residence, come out armed. | ||
| And yeah, I get a broom and shovel people don't understand can actually be wielded and are considered deadly weapons when wielded as such, but armed and start assaulting that law enforcement officer to the degree that the suspect is able to get up and then grab a shovel and start assaulting the officer again to where he needs to pull his firearm and discharge it in order to defend himself. | ||
| And he got hospitalized over it. | ||
| Now, what are the odds in any other state, in any other location, that that situation would occur? | ||
| And he would go in a foot pursuit, get in a fight with a suspect. | ||
| And instead of people coming out of their houses to help him, they end up beating him with shovels and a freaking broom, helping the suspect out to where the suspect then starts beating him. | ||
| How many radical leftist nut jobs have to be over in the state of Minnesota for the odds of that to actually happen? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, that's the problem here, right? | ||
| Because they've just normalized it. | ||
| And they've, I mean, these people are brainwashed. | ||
| I keep lightly saying the fact that I just think that they're low IQ'd people, but I think they're actually just brainwashed. | ||
| They think that they're actually helping these people, that they're doing a bigger cause here. | ||
| But where were they when Barack Obama was out there wrangling up these illegal aliens and deporting them? | ||
| I mean, the numbers that Barack Obama was able to capture have me drooling. | ||
| And I hope it could get anywhere near that. | ||
| Unfortunately, though, these lefties are really going after us now. | ||
| And they don't want these mass deportations. | ||
| They don't want us getting the worst of the worst out of the country. | ||
| You know, I broke a report down early in the show in regards to a man who was, well, he was convicted and he spent a couple of years in prison. | ||
| He says it's 10 years in prison for trying to do an honor killing. | ||
| And he tried to stab his, he did stab his sister. | ||
| He said that she was a bad Muslim and he tried to kill her. | ||
| And we, first off, only gave him 10 years in prison. | ||
| And then he was released. | ||
| And I just recently caught up with him, even though he's supposed to be removed back in 2012. | ||
| And now he's heading back to Afghanistan. | ||
| But these are the people that were able to get into our country. | ||
| We've allowed them into our country. | ||
| And they continue to commit these heinous, heinous acts. | ||
| I mean, Matt, how come the other side isn't seeing this? | ||
| These stories of a female who was almost murdered by her own brother because she was being a quote bad Muslim. | ||
| And they're not going, all right, like I'm a feminist. | ||
| Not me. | ||
| They are feminists. | ||
| And how do you not see this and say, okay, like at this point, some deportations is acceptable? | ||
| Because it doesn't fit their agenda. | ||
| That's why. | ||
| That's exactly why, because it doesn't fit their agenda. | ||
| And there's this thing called confirmation bias, which they absolutely hate. | ||
| You know, we see these things and we look at them and we go, absolutely, this needs to happen. | ||
| What they see on their social media feeds, which is what makes it so much worse, is people like their governor, their elected officials, the mayor, the police chief, all of these other radical nut jobs that are out there as well. | ||
| And what's worse is some of them are in elected positions that sit there and refuel and just pour gas on the fire trying to tell them that what they're doing is okay, that they're going to defend their First Amendment rights to protest. | ||
| Well, I got news for you. | ||
| Breaking into the back of a federal vehicle, yanking out a weapons case, doxing federal agents on your YouTube feed doing things like that, that's not legal. | ||
| And that's not protected by under the First Amendment. | ||
| As a matter of fact, your First Amendment rights stop where you start going off on other people's rights. | ||
| When you start affecting other people, that's where your rights stop. | ||
| And the Supreme Court has ruled on that so many times, it's not even worth debating, right? | ||
| Like it is, it is beyond legal. | ||
| And this situation is so out of control. | ||
| Not only do you have that officer that ends up getting assaulted and needs to discharge his weapon, but it's so out of control that within minutes, you're able to have mobs of people show up, just like you're shown on the screen there, rip weapons out of the vehicle, and they feel so emboldened. | ||
| Like these people are committing federal crimes, federal crimes, broadcasting it on YouTube, broadcasting on X. | ||
| They don't care. | ||
| Like that is the mentality and the resolve of these people that they are that stupid. | ||
| They think that they're going to be covered. | ||
| And why would they think they're going to be covered? | ||
| Well, because you have the mayor, the police chief, you've got the governor. | ||
| You've got all these people that are sitting there supporting them. | ||
| It is beyond time. | ||
| And those people also need to be held accountable for their actions. | ||
| In my opinion, they're as equally responsible, as equally responsible as those people on the streets, and they know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, no, they do know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| And I still can't believe that story that dropped last night in regards to all of this, how they gained up on this one federal officer. | ||
| And it's just everyone needs to go to prison for a very long time at this point. | ||
| There's no other way of looking at this, but I want to shift gears over a little bit because this story is crazy. | ||
| And I want to get your take on it. | ||
| It's in regards to a veteran, a Navy veteran, who is now being accused of. | ||
| And the details are interesting because he's a federal contractor and he's being accused of stealing secret classified national defense information. | ||
| And in court, they don't say this, but this is kind of what the DOJ is alluding to, even though this isn't in the criminal filing, that he did possibly give this over to a WAPO journalist who had their home raided yesterday. | ||
| Now, Pam Bonnie detailed the specifics to all of this yesterday in clip 13. | ||
| Let's take a listen. | ||
| Sean, the First Amendment is a bedrock principle. | ||
| This isn't about that. | ||
| This is about classified material that could jeopardize lives. | ||
| And this guy, this guy, this IT guy that worked for Department of War, and Pete Hegseth has been amazing and he's up against a lot with these people. | ||
| This guy that worked, he was a contractor, IT contractor, who had classified information, is charged now with leaking classified information involving a foreign adversary. | ||
| He could jeopardize the lives, the safety of our men and women in the military. | ||
| So today, it's been reported that the great men and women of the FBI executed a search warrant at the direction of Kash Patel and my office on the reporter's home, seizing the devices that contained classified material regarding our foreign adversaries. | ||
| And that's what we're looking into now. | ||
| But the guy, the guy from the IT department, is in jail. | ||
| President Trump has made it very clear: you will not jeopardize the men and women in our military and you will not leak classified information. | ||
| Okay, so Matt, it sounds like that they've already made the direct linkage and they've confirmed there was classified information there. | ||
| Your response to this, because obviously as a veteran, this is deeply concerning that a Navy vet would, now he's obviously a contractor, but he would do something like this. | ||
| And according to reports, it has to do with Venezuela. | ||
| So we don't know the specifics, obviously. | ||
| We probably never will, given the fact it's classified. | ||
| But what do you make of all of this? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So that Navy veteran knew what was right and what was wrong when it went down to leaking that classified information. | ||
| From what I've read, they held a top secret security clearance. | ||
| There is specific rules and regulations that go into like the governing and moving of that information, even once it's printed off, how it's supposed to be stored, how it's going to be transferred between point A and point B. | ||
| I mean, every step of that is very, you know, closely watched. | ||
| And so for that information to make it out to this level, yeah, they made a giant mistake. | ||
| And not a mistake. | ||
| They knowingly broke the law, if that's what actually the facts of the case actually end up coming out to be and they end up getting convicted. | ||
| When it goes down to raiding the lady's home, they've got to be able to take that information that has been illegally disseminated and be able to trace and figure out and essentially contain the problem. | ||
| And so that's where that comes in. | ||
| Whether or not she had the intent knowingly, you know, whatever, that's going to be decided here in the future, likely with information that's going to be found on her computer. | ||
| But it goes back into what we were talking about, you know, Minnesota. | ||
| And if you go through the reporter from the Washington Post, I mean, she is extremely open about the amount of people that had been fired, been let go, and how it created, I think it was 160 plus sources or something like that for her, because the amount of people that were upset that they ended up getting let go. | ||
| Information that I have to know on some of these situations when it came down to how our Intel community was being ran underneath Joe Biden is extremely troubling with some of the ways that they were conducting business and some of the things that they were doing. | ||
| And a lot of these people were justified in being let go, in my opinion. | ||
| And I don't know if it's those 160 plus people that are coming to her as sources, but the problem is, is that they're all, in my opinion, radical leftist nut jobs. | ||
| There was a, we're going to call it an Intel fusion cell that was over inside of Europe that I was made aware of that was working specifically on Ukraine. | ||
| And what I got told, and it was being led by the United States of America, by the way. | ||
| And so this is our Intel fusion cell that was working for Ukraine underneath Joe Biden. | ||
| And the commander of that particular fusion cell, and I've got this documented, the commander of that particular fusion cell wanted to have, what do you call it, a polygraph test done for all of the people that were going into that fusion cell for loyalty to Ukraine, not to the United States government, not to the U.S. Constitution. | ||
| They wanted a CI poly, a counterintelligence polygraph done for people to make sure that they were loyal to Ukraine. | ||
| And that is a U.S. officer that was proposing that in front of people. | ||
| That is our United States military. | ||
| So it's not surprising to me that we have a Navy veteran. | ||
| Just because you have the title veteran doesn't mean you're a good person, doesn't mean that you served honorably. | ||
| And doesn't mean that just because you didn't get, you know, UCMJ action while you were in, that you're a good human being. | ||
| You just maybe got away with some of the crap that you were doing because you were surrounded by the other nut jobs. | ||
| And so these people leaking this information, in my opinion, are likely doing it because they don't agree with the policies. | ||
| And it goes right back into the insurrection that we have inside of this country. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| No, I think it does. | ||
| And it's very obvious, especially if it's about Venezuela, that the individual who's doing this was obviously politically motivated. | ||
| I don't see another reason for it at this point. | ||
| But it's good to see that the Pentagon's crushing down on this. | ||
| I hope they do more of it. | ||
| You know, I'm always on edge, though, when I see that a journalist's home is raided. | ||
| Obviously, that's deeply concerning. | ||
| But again, the left didn't really care when James O'Keefe's home was raided. | ||
| So I don't want to hear about that, especially because James did nothing wrong. | ||
| But also just the simple fact that a journalist potentially took in classified information, knowing that that was possibly stolen as well, is a major issue. | ||
| The Washington Post, also, just so our folks know, still has not given a statement on this. | ||
| The last time that they did put out a statement, it just said that they're going to wait to see what the evidence brings. | ||
| And so we'll continue to wait. | ||
| But again, this doesn't really surprise me that this is going on right now over at the federal government. | ||
| Okay, I want to weigh in on this one too. | ||
| I want you to weigh in on it. | ||
| I want to talk about Iran for a second because Iran, obviously, it's been a topic that many have been discussing over these last few days. | ||
| I have my, I'm a little bit on the reserve side of this. | ||
| I don't want to see, obviously, the United States too involved, but I understand that obviously that the Iranian people do need support. | ||
| But right now, President Trump put out this message. | ||
| We're going to play Clip 14 for our audience because we were receiving reports internally over in the country that there were protesters being slaughtered. | ||
| Thousands of them has been, it's been all over the place. | ||
| Originally 300 was mentioned, but now we're talking north of possibly 12 to 20,000 people have been killed by this government. | ||
| Now, President Trump did put out a certain warning, and it kind of looked like last night that there might have been potential retaliation for the government going out there and killing people. | ||
| We did see that obviously the airspace was shut down briefly and they were probably on high alert. | ||
| But President Trump did say that he received some good intel from those on the ground right now that the protesters are no longer being killed. | ||
| Take a listen. | ||
| We have been notified and pretty strongly, but we'll find out what that all means. | ||
| But we've been told that the killing in Iran is stopping and it's stopped and it's stopping. | ||
| And there's no plan for executions or an execution or executions. | ||
| So I've been told that on good authority, we'll find out about it. | ||
| I'm sure if it happens, we'll all be very upset, including you. | ||
| We'll be very upset, but that's just gotten to me some information that the killing has stopped, that the executions have stopped and not going to have an execution, which a lot of people were talking about for the last couple of days. | ||
| Today was going to be the day of execution. | ||
| Yeah, so there was obviously a protester who was going to be killed. | ||
| Now, again, we don't know the status of that person. | ||
| He was a younger gentleman. | ||
| I'm trying to remember his name right now. | ||
| So I do apologize. | ||
| In his early 20s, he apparently was charged with disrespecting Allah. | ||
| I don't know how they officially do it, but it doesn't get a lawyer. | ||
| It was given 10 minutes to say goodbye to his family. | ||
| He was supposed to be publicly hung. | ||
| So the president's saying that he will not be executed. | ||
| What do you make of all of this? | ||
| Because obviously I don't trust the Iranians, the government specifically, and how they're treating protesters. | ||
| And they are also trying to just shut down the internet so information can't get out. | ||
| But obviously, Starlink is pushing back on that. | ||
| But what do you make of all of this? | ||
| Do you trust them when it comes to the president saying that they're not going to be executing these people? | ||
| Yeah, no, I do not trust them whatsoever. | ||
| This is the type of government that's going to take those people instead of hanging them in public is going to go bury them in a shallow grave somewhere off camera. | ||
| And they arrested over 10,000 protesters. | ||
| They took over the hospitals, right? | ||
| What the regime was doing was they were going to the hospitals over inside of Iran and they were looking for people that were wounded. | ||
| You're talking about a regime that pulled up with belt-fed machine guns and opened up on crowds of people. | ||
| The number you heard was as high as 20,000. | ||
| The number I heard from my contacts over inside of Israel was over 30,000. | ||
| I mean, it's appalling to think. | ||
| And if it's 30,000 dead, I mean, think of how many wounded. | ||
| You could easily go times three, times four wounded that are over there. | ||
| And they went through the hospitals. | ||
| There's videos of them busting to the hospitals, taking these protesters. | ||
| And they weren't just going to hang one. | ||
| They were going to start the public executions of all of them. | ||
| And they were giving them expedited trials. | ||
| That one guy is what ended up making the news, what ended up making it viral. | ||
| But they plan on executing way more than that. | ||
| When I look at what this administration wants to do over inside of Iran, bombing Iran isn't necessarily going to teach them a lesson, nor do I think that's the intent of what the United States wants to do over there. | ||
| When we look at Venezuela, and I talked to you about this before, when we look at Venezuela, it's not just about drugs being ran in and out of the country, right? | ||
| Like it's not even in the top five countries that runs drugs in the United States of America. | ||
| And we immediately started blowing up their boats as they were trying to drive them up over here into the States to smuggle whatever it could be into the United States of America. | ||
| We use that as an excuse to be able to take care of national security matters. | ||
| And we're using that as an excuse as well to start putting some strain on Russia and start putting some strain on China. | ||
| And just as I discussed last time, Iran is kind of this little intermediary in between Russia and China where they're supporting the Russian war effort over inside of Ukraine, but they're also laundering money and receiving weapons in return for moving oil from Venezuela back over to China because China lent so much money to the Maduro regime. | ||
| And so when we're looking over here at Iran and what the United States of America wants to do with Iran, it's not about teaching that regime a lesson. | ||
| It's about actually having that color revolution that's taking place over there rise up and actually having a regime change in that country. | ||
| And so in my opinion, what Trump's likely weighing out that's on his desk, which, you know, we heard reports that these airstrikes ended up getting called off at the last minute last night. | ||
| And what he's likely going to be weighing out is whether or not, you know, the are being actioned, right? | ||
| Like bombs, the warheads are being put on the right foreheads and that you have the right people on the ground. | ||
| And I'm not talking about U.S. troops. | ||
| I'm talking about assets and things of that nature that are ready to stand up and move and take over. | ||
| And, you know, no, no, you know, insurgency has ever really been that successful against the government without the help of their military. | ||
| Going to be people inside the military that are going to have to rise up. | ||
| And we've got to make sure all these pieces are in line before we people, because you really get one shot at this. | ||
| And if you blow, he's got to make sure this thing's done right. | ||
| And I don't think he really cares. | ||
| I mean, he's going to care about human lives. | ||
| He's going to care about people getting killed. | ||
| But the picture here is Russia, China, and making sure they're not coming after the United States of America. | ||
| And I think it's very telling. | ||
| And if anything, it should be confirmation when we look at the cell phone outages that were taking place here in the United States yesterday. | ||
| Because the moment we ended up having word that we're about to go in and bomb Iran, all of a sudden we have this cyber attack that's launched against Verizon and AT ⁇ T. | ||
| It's shutting down everything over on the East Coast. | ||
| And you look at some of the places that were affected. | ||
| You're talking about the Tampa area. | ||
| You're talking about Colorado. | ||
| You're talking about North Carolina. | ||
| You're talking about Virginia. | ||
| All of these locations have very strategic national security assets that are at them and troops that, quite frankly, handle a lot of things. | ||
| And so you're affecting the communications of those people and you're making our apparatus a heck of a lot slower. | ||
| And that's a signal, in my opinion. | ||
| That is a sign that we are on the right track here. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And I'm glad you mentioned that because that was my thoughts yesterday as I was seeing the reports trickling out. | ||
| I was like, this isn't coincidental. | ||
| Matt, before you go, I want to make sure I get your take on this too, because it has to obviously do with the technology that we all strongly rely on. | ||
| But the Department of War, I was traveling with them earlier this week, Pete Hegstet, the secretary, and they announced with Elon Musk over at SpaceX that we're going to start working with Grok and they're going to start implementing it and kind of allowing these two platforms to collaborate over at the Department of War. | ||
| The exact quote was AI acceleration strategy used by the secretary, Pete Hegseth. | ||
| Are you concerned? | ||
| We have about a minute left. | ||
| Are you concerned by any of this? | ||
| Or do you think that this could be done in a safe manner? | ||
| Oh, man, do I trust artificial intelligence more than I do military intelligence? | ||
| That's a very good question, right? | ||
| Like everybody knows the jokes about military intel. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, obviously, I have my concerns going into that. | ||
| I saw a video of the Space Force the other day that was marching down the street, and they just look absolutely nerdy as hell. | ||
| But those guys, they are number crunchers. | ||
| They're really good at what they do. | ||
| You know what I mean? | ||
| Like they are smart. | ||
| And those are the type of people that are going to be taking this information and uploading it into different systems because he not only talked about having on unclassified systems, but also on classified systems as well. | ||
| That can help several members of the military in their day-to-day tasks. | ||
| It helps move things further. | ||
| Anybody in the military will tell you that, you know, they've been bogged down by paperwork over the last two decades, that it's just gotten more and more out of control. | ||
| And so, if there is a proper way to get information ahead of a lot faster, it'll make our force a lot more efficient, but it's also dangerous, right? | ||
| I've seen Grock give out some really bad information. | ||
| I debated Grock one time, you know, because you can sit there and you can go back and forth. | ||
| I debated Grock on one of my live sessions and got Grock to admit to less than 5% accuracy on this particular topic, less than 5% accuracy. | ||
| And even Grock admitted, like, I probably shouldn't be debating you on this topic. | ||
| I probably shouldn't be talking about this. | ||
| It is absolutely disgusting. | ||
| So, that system going into our military-industrial complex, yeah, it bothers me, but hopefully, we have people to fix it. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| No, I block Rock because I don't want people tagging and trying to get Grock to answer on my tweets. | ||
| It's just, it all creeps me out. | ||
| Matt, thank you so much. | ||
| We appreciate your time. | ||
| As always, again, folks, give him a follow on X at Angertab. | ||
| That's where you're going to find him. | ||
| Thanks again, Matt. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| More to discuss in a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello. | |
| Watching live right now at fan.video. | ||
| Good morning, and welcome back to the American Journal works. | ||
| You're jumping on board with us today. | ||
| A lot happening over here. | ||
| I told you, we had three hours of news content coming our way, and I meant it when I said it. | ||
| There's some good news too, and we always celebrate a victory, and this is a good one. | ||
| The state of Georgia, it looks like the governor, Ryan Kemp, is about to sign a big 2A win into law. | ||
| Thanks to the great work of Senator Colton Moore, obviously from the great state of Georgia, folks. | ||
| We're going to focus on Georgia, so buckle up on this one. | ||
| It is called Senate Bill 204. | ||
| Now, just recently passed over in the Senate, and then the governor now is going to be signing this into law. | ||
| That's where we're at right now. | ||
| But it has a lot to do with, you know, preventing local governments from mandating on how you could store your firearms. | ||
| And this is a big one. | ||
| Joining us to break down his bill is the great senator from the beautiful state of Georgia, Colton Moore, joins us now. | ||
| And of course, you are running as well for Congress. | ||
| So it's an honor to have you on the show today, my friend. | ||
| It's always good to have you back. | ||
| We're very excited and we love to celebrate a good 2A victory. | ||
| And this is one for the people, of course. | ||
| So I want to break down this bill that you expect the governor to sign into law shortly. | ||
| Hey, Brianna, thank you so much for having me. | ||
| I mean, I've never experienced this much freedom coming out of the Georgia Senate until two days ago when we passed this legislation. | ||
| I mean, any like any other Georgian, when you travel across the state and like a lot of other states in this country, you're going to find yourself in some liberal cities, some places where they do not respect the Second Amendment. | ||
| And these municipalities, they're passing gun laws and they're essentially making people criminals when they should be victims. | ||
| So these municipalities are saying, if you don't store your gun to our standards and someone steals your gun, we're going to charge you with a crime. | ||
| So we have this thing in law called preemption, which is a principle in law that says the state government or the federal government's law supersedes that of a municipality. | ||
| So what this legislation did was say that if any municipality passes any gun law that is more stringent than what the state of Georgia already has, then any citizen in the state can sue that municipality for $25,000 per occurrence, any citizen. | ||
| So it is, you know, essentially puts the enforcement back into the hands of the citizenry to keep these liberal, you know, crazy lunatic places like Savannah, Georgia, or downtown Atlanta from infringing upon our gun rights. | ||
| And you know that these cities are the most dangerous places in the country right now, and it's where you want to be bringing your heat. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And that's what's the concerning part in all of this. | ||
| And I like that you've done this. | ||
| I believe that the roots of this all came about from what was going on in Savannah, Georgia. | ||
| What was happening there that inspired you to get this bill up and going? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So there were 41 law-abiding citizens who had their guns stolen from their vehicle, right? | ||
| They're a victim of a crime, but yet they were charged with a crime that was going to be a thousand dollar fine and up to 30 days in jail because the mayor of Savannah said you guys didn't store your guns properly. | ||
| So that's where this come about. | ||
| And now those citizens all have a right to sue for $25,000. | ||
| So you start adding that up. | ||
| And essentially, obviously, you can break a municipality quite quickly if they do anything to infringe upon one's Second Amendment rights. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, this is this is a good win. | ||
| And we love to hear that because again, this is worth fighting for. | ||
| I actually want to get your take on this, Senator. | ||
| When we talk about the Second Amendment, the DOJ has actually split off and made a special section over at the Civil Rights Division just to be hyper-focused on the issue that is Second Amendment and protecting it. | ||
| Are you excited to see what comes of that? | ||
| Because Harmie Dillon is obviously the one who's heading all of this. | ||
| And she's going after these local governments as well, who are just refusing to give even permits for folks to even be able to have and obtain firearms. | ||
| She's the one who's pushing back on this. | ||
| Are you excited with what you're seeing so far from the ZOJ? | ||
| No, absolutely. | ||
| Finally, we recognize again what this is. | ||
| This is a God-given right to self-preservation. | ||
| I mean, guns are the great equalizer. | ||
| You know, you just showed a picture of my wife there, right? | ||
| I mean, she's a little lady, but with a gun, she's as powerful as any big man. | ||
| And we've got to recognize that this is God-given rights. | ||
| We have a second amendment to protect ourselves from any type of government infringing upon that. | ||
| That's what the whole Bill of Rights are for. | ||
| And these liberal, you know, don't understand that, but hopefully they understand a lawsuit for $25,000 per occurrence. | ||
| Yeah, no, they do. | ||
| And, you know, I love the fact that you brought up your wife. | ||
| I was just warning the control room that I'm going to bring up my own 2A story. | ||
| We've got the video of this. | ||
| A man who actually followed me into my building, and I live in Texas, found out the hard way when he thought he could just be a creeper and follow me into my home. | ||
| It didn't work out well for him. | ||
| He was trespassing, doesn't live there, admitted this to police, but he still pled not guilty in court and he's awaiting his court date. | ||
| But this is the 2A victory story that I had to share. | ||
| Again, I keep sharing it because I tell everyone, go to the range. | ||
| But here he is following me up the stairs into my home, trying to get into my home. | ||
| And then he has a second thought when you see it in his face in just a moment, when he sees a glock come out of a bag very quickly and off he ran. | ||
| But like you said, this is the great equalizer. | ||
| And this is what we need to be pushing for. | ||
| I say it all the time, Senator. | ||
| Women need to start going out there and getting comfortable because when this happens, you need to be able to fight back. | ||
| And again, this was a man who came to our country from Egypt. | ||
| He's been here for quite some time. | ||
| So he knows how things go. | ||
| But he learned that in Texas and in Red States, we don't mess around the women over here. | ||
| So I love the fact that you also share and talk about your wife on that front because it is a real thing. | ||
| And everyone needs to get on board with that and make sure that you learn how to use your firearm. | ||
| So again, tell the women in your life, make sure you do just that. | ||
| I want to get to this one. | ||
| This is a big one too, a very important one. | ||
| The Supreme Court ruled yesterday, nine zeros, this is unanimous, that the warrantless welfare checks where police could enter your home and it happened to an individual in Montana, but they could enter a home without any probable cause. | ||
| This was a big one. | ||
| I know a lot of 2A owner or 2A advocates are very much against this because they're able to do this without a warrant. | ||
| What do you make of the ruling that came out yesterday from the Supreme Court? | ||
| Because again, that was unanimous. | ||
| That's concerning. | ||
| Yeah, so this is the first I'm seeing of it. | ||
| You know, obviously, if you're allowing the government to come into your home without a warrant, it's a clear violation of our Fourth Amendment rights. | ||
| So I'm not sure what basis the Supreme Court, I'll have to go back and read that opinion. | ||
| Where in the world did they get nine votes? | ||
| I mean, I would love to know what Clarence Thomas had to say about this. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| Well, that's the concerning part in all of this because, yeah, I don't know how they were able to get away with this. | ||
| Again, the argument was the rebuttal was the Fourth Amendment, and sadly that didn't stick according to the Supreme Court. | ||
| And the fact that it was unanimous is deeply, deeply concerning. | ||
| I want to thank you for joining our show as always, Senator Colton Moore. | ||
| It's always a pleasure to have you on again to our audience. | ||
| If you live in Georgia, make sure you get involved because you are running for Congress. | ||
| You are looking to fill the seat of MTG. | ||
| We love her. | ||
| She's a fighter, and you are a fighter too. | ||
| You've been at this for quite some time now. | ||
| So it would be great to get you over in Congress as well. | ||
| So folks, make sure you give him a follow on X right now. | ||
| Real Colton Moore is where you could follow him. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us under the please. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| We appreciate it as always. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| All right, folks, we're getting ready to buckle up on another story that's deeply concerning in Texas. | ||
| And I wanted to make sure it was on your radar as well. | ||
| Logan Washburn will be joining us in a few moments. | ||
| And once he's ready to go, we'll bring him straight to you. | ||
| Because again, there was a really interesting report about an arrest that happened. | ||
| Logan's been digging into it and has what he's saying is ties to a pedo group that is online that is harassing children and having them do just heinous, heinous things. | ||
| And there was a lot of threats that were being made over at schools throughout the area, the DFW area. | ||
| So he'll be joining us to break down his report that he just put out over at the Dallas Express. | ||
| So we look forward to that. | ||
| But, you know, let's talk about a couple of other things. | ||
| You know, we've been following a lot of really important stories in regards to, there we go again, Minneapolis. | ||
| You know, Nick Shirley's doing great work over in the state of Minnesota, and he's going door to door, knocking, asking questions that a lot of people just don't even want to answer. | ||
| But he did just that and he released a new report about the fraud that may have been taking place. | ||
| I say may have been taking, allegedly, because no one's been convicted yet in this business. | ||
| But Nick Shirley's pointing out that there's a lot of very questionable things happening over at a transportation business in Clip 4. | ||
| And he posted this last night, his very latest report. | ||
| Let's take a listen. | ||
| How are you? | ||
| We're looking for the transportation company. | ||
| Safari Transportation? | ||
| Looking for Safari Transportation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's no business Safari Transportation here. | |
| No Safari Transportation? | ||
| Safari Transportation. | ||
| 607 Cedar. | ||
| We're just looking for Safari Transportation. | ||
| But this is registered for Safari Transportation. | ||
| 607. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, we don't know. | |
| We're asking where Safari Transportation is. | ||
| We don't know. | ||
| Okay, so this business is not here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dorican. | |
| Fuad Omar. | ||
| Fuad Omar. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We don't know. | |
| Do you see this? | ||
| What is this? | ||
| Money transferring. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Well, this is registered. | ||
| This is fraud taking place. | ||
| This is supposed to say. | ||
| This is for Safari Transportation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go find out. | |
| Yeah, we did find out. | ||
| This is fraud right here. | ||
| Registered here. | ||
| This is registered. | ||
|
unidentified
|
2015. | |
| 2015. | ||
| Safari Transportation, state of Minnesota. | ||
| 2015. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. | |
| Well, but it's registered now. | ||
| This is current just off the state of Minnesota website today. | ||
| This is from today. | ||
| I just printed this off today. | ||
| Fuadi Omar. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go check it out. | |
| We're here. | ||
| This is 607. | ||
| Where's Safari Transportation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's no Safari, Pierre. | |
| Okay, so it's a fraudulent business. | ||
| Did you see Safari anything here? | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| It's not here. | ||
| It's a fraud. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You see, sir? | |
| Okay, thank you. | ||
| We're going to go to the next stage. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Let's keep moving on. | ||
| So 607, this is supposed to be Safari Transportation. | ||
| No transportation company. | ||
| And now we're going to 617, another transportation company. | ||
| However, it is actually Cedar Riverside Liquor. | ||
| Where is the transportation company? | ||
| 617. | ||
| 617. | ||
| Transportation for the state of Minnesota is registered to 617 Cedar Avenue South and it's a liquor store. | ||
| David, they aren't even trying to hide that these are transportation companies. | ||
| Where are the vans at? | ||
| Should we ask? | ||
| Let's go ask. | ||
| People like these questions. | ||
| Don't you dare ask a question that they don't want to answer. | ||
| Nick Shirley is obviously doing great work with his partner in crime over there, you know, asking some very uncomfortable questions to people who may or may not be committing fraud. | ||
| This is a story that's not going anywhere anytime soon. | ||
| We look forward to seeing Nick Shirley's continuous reports. | ||
| But speaking of reports, I want to turn to one great journalist over at Dallas Express right now, Logan Washburn, is joining us about a story he's been digging into. | ||
| Now, this has to do with the recent arrests in the DFW area. | ||
| And again, folks, I keep telling you, buckle up, DFW, a lot going on over there that the American people need to be paying attention to. | ||
| And Logan's doing incredible work exposing just that. | ||
| So it's an honor to have you back on the show, my friend. | ||
| You recently put out a story in regards to, I saw this circulating a lot, a lot of threats being made to a lot of the public schools over in DFW. | ||
| You've been doing some digging on a recent arrest that's been made. | ||
| What's going on in DFW that has you very concerned? | ||
| So what had a lot of us concerned earlier this month was that we saw some really disturbing video threats going out to schools in the area and not just DFW, but across Texas. | ||
| There was this group that called itself NTX. | ||
| They were opposing with weapons in front of the Nazi flag, holding up what appeared to be explosives and making really concerning threats. | ||
| Now, at the time, the Fort Worth police dismissed this as saying it's from overseas and likely not credible, which is true in many ways, but we'll get to that. | ||
| So around the same time between New Year's and Christmas, there was a string of arsons. | ||
| We now know that the arsonist was allegedly connected to the alleged arsonist was connected to this extremist group behind the threats. | ||
| And so as you keep polling, it gets deeper and deeper and more concerning. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And I want to learn more about this because the individual who's in question right now, obviously, these are allegations and we're going to have to wait to see what plays out in court. | ||
| But you detail in your latest report specifics as to who you think that they're tied up with. | ||
| Can you break that down for us as well? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| So the suspect, Evan Banda, was arrested on January 8th for allegedly committing five arsons. | ||
| They tied him to what they called a violent extremist hate organization. | ||
| They never specified which one that was. | ||
| Now we spoke to Becca Sphinx, an independent online investigator. | ||
| She focuses on online extremists. | ||
| She said she's been looking into these threats and the suspects are claiming ties to the violent Ukrainian group MKY, which translates to maniac murder cult in English. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| That's concerning. | ||
| Can you tell us a little bit about that too? | ||
| Because that's got a lot of red flags up because how are they able to, if this is a Ukrainian-based group, how are they able to carry things like this out here in the United States? | ||
| So the way these groups work is that they are violent accelerationists. | ||
| They aim to destroy all of society. | ||
| They don't have real clear political goals. | ||
| It's just destruction. | ||
| So they use the internet to connect with their networks, and then they recruit members to commit violence, record it, and then upload it online to inspire more violence. | ||
| This group is also connected to the pedophile group 764 that grooms children online and they inspire children to commit suicides, stabbings, terrible, disgusting things. | ||
| And literally, just objectively, the way to describe this group is just evil. | ||
| That is the only ideology they ascribe to. | ||
| So Becca Spink said that the group behind the terror threats to schools is claiming affiliation with MKY. | ||
| That is essentially part of the broader 764 network. | ||
| So these are recognized as terrorist groups in other countries, and the United States government is also on it as well. | ||
| Again, Fort Worth police won't confirm it. | ||
| They don't want to bring notoriety to them or give them more power. | ||
| But that is essentially what this is. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| Well, we're keeping our eye on that because obviously that is deeply, deeply concerning. | ||
| And I want to walk through the charges that the suspect is currently, the one who was just recently apprehended, is facing right now. | ||
| It's terrorism, terroristic threats, possession of child pornography, and five counts of arson. | ||
| And that's being, well, that's according to the Tarrant County jail records right now. | ||
| Can you break all of those allegations down for us? | ||
| Because when you look at also the bond that's up right now on the website as well, I mean, he's was slapped with a $1.4 million bond. | ||
| I mean, this is concerning, especially because this is a teenager. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And his bond actually may be even higher. | ||
| But as you're looking at these threats, you can break them down by what they're likely connected to. | ||
| The terrorism threats are connected to the fact that he made videos of the arsons that were connected to these terroristic threats. | ||
| So you can break the terrorism down by the threats. | ||
| And then the arson obviously was connected to the fires between Christmas and New Year's. | ||
| The child pornography is anyone's guess, but it clearly goes along with the trend of 764 and MKY targeting children. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, it's all really concerning, and I'm glad you're on the case because this is something the American people need to know about, parents need to know about. | ||
| I saw, obviously, that this is meant to create havoc, and a lot of parents were deeply concerned. | ||
| So learning the key facts to all of this, getting down to the core, is very, very important. | ||
| But again, it's another reason why parents need to also focus on online safety and to know what their kids are doing online as well, because this is a big one. | ||
| Logan, I want to thank you and all the incredible work you do over at Dallas Express. | ||
| It's always an honor to talk to you and catch up with you. | ||
| So thank you. | ||
| Again, folks, give him a follow on X as well. | ||
| Logan Washburn76. | ||
| That's Logan Washburn76. | ||
| You do incredible reporting in the DFW area and the, you know, the whole Texas area, we could say at this point. | ||
| So, Logan, thank you. | ||
| We appreciate your time as always. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| I appreciate you having me on. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| All right, folks, I wanted to get this cliff off because this is a great one. | ||
| Cliff 12, we're going to play for you. | ||
| It gave me a good chuckle. | ||
| A news anchor, one of my former colleagues over at Fox, actually, he's over at a new network now. | ||
| But he grilled Congresswoman Lisa McClain about her husband's recent purchase of some Elon Musk stocks. | ||
| Now, it's interesting, given the fact that you guys know, based on my reporting, we now have the collaboration between the Department of War and Elon Musk's AI program. | ||
| So that timeline, we just learned about this week, but according to people who may be in Congress, they might have had a little heads up on that one. | ||
| Take a listen to clip 12. | ||
| Your husband bought stock in Elon Musk's AI company, which is not publicly traded XAI in the private market just days before a report had surfaced that the Pentagon was expanding XAI's role in military systems. | ||
| On our tablet, you guys can flash this up, the periodic transaction report from the Congresswoman. | ||
| My question for you is: can you assure us? | ||
| We've covered this issue of conflicts of interest and what have you. | ||
| Can you assure us this purchase was not based on any kind of inside information? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| 100%. | ||
| Because if it was, we wouldn't have bought 100,000 shares. | ||
| We would have bought a heck of a lot more. | ||
| But I also want to stop you because we don't even have your facts straight on that. | ||
| It wasn't a publicly traded stock. | ||
| It was, I think, about $470 million, of which it was a private offering. | ||
| Right, which is what I, that's what I was saying. | ||
| It's not a publicly traded company. | ||
| Which is like a marketing. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| But that leads you. | ||
| The same question would apply, whether it's publicly traded or whether it's traded on these private markets about conflicts, potential conflicts of interest. | ||
| So that's why I'm asking if you could assure us that he didn't know anything about that. | ||
| And quite frankly. | ||
| And quite frankly, I think that's a very fair question to ask, especially with all of the insider trading that happens up here. | ||
| But we got to have our facts straight. | ||
| I wish, one, you know, we don't have any, the Pentagon doesn't release that information, but I can 100% assure you that we didn't have the insider information. | ||
| We didn't have the information beforehand. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Because I know there was some other scrutiny of your husband's investments in the past, but you say no inside information. | ||
| You can say it. | ||
| I mean, that's what we do for a living. | ||
| Understand. | ||
| Thank you, Congresswoman, for answering all the questions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, we appreciate it. | |
| You know, like they say down south, bless your heart. | ||
| That's where she was going with it. | ||
| Have a good day. | ||
| It's the equivalent. | ||
| It was the equivalent. | ||
| They don't like being called out for it. | ||
| I say it's always a great question to ask. | ||
| And it's a good journalistic way of asking a tough question for someone who probably doesn't want to answer it. | ||
| Obviously, it's an uncomfortable subject matter. | ||
| And yes, she could dance around the AI one there, but there's a lot of questionable things taking place, obviously. | ||
| A lot of things that there's a lot of questions that are being asked in regards to her husband's investment opportunities. | ||
| And again, she's no Nancy Pelosi, but folks, if you want to get rich, just run for Congress. | ||
| That's the real answer here. | ||
| Don't work hard. | ||
| Just run for Congress. | ||
| Run for Congress. | ||
| There's only a couple actually who aren't a part of it. | ||
| Tim Burchett, obviously from the great state of Tennessee, the congressman there, is one of the very few who isn't making any stock trades. | ||
| And he's literally eating peanut butter jelly sandwiches for lunch every day. | ||
| He posts it on Axe. | ||
| I think it's great. | ||
| I think it's great. | ||
| Folks, I'm going to keep reminding you all right now to head on over to the AlexJonestore.com right now. | ||
| We're giving away a free hat with every purchase, no minimum required when it comes to spending. | ||
| So head on over right now to the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Of course, these hats are being given away when, you know, until we run out. | ||
| So head on over right now, the alexjonestore.com with every purchase. | ||
| You're going to get one of those great hats. | ||
| And you only got about two days remaining to win the F-250 Ford Raptor and the Black Ford F-250 plus $20,000 in cash. | ||
| So head on over right now before this is gone and possibly win $20,000. | ||
| I mean, that would be amazing. | ||
| I want to do it. | ||
| I probably should do that right now, actually. | ||
| All right, folks, I want to keep heading some very important stories that I think you need to be read up on. | ||
| I want to talk about this one. | ||
| Let's get this one up. | ||
| This is Senator Ron Paul, or sorry, Ron Johnson's office. | ||
| They announced yesterday that they have just subpoenaed ATT Verizon and Lumen for what was their roles in the Arctic Frost investigations. | ||
| Now, again, there are companies, and when they are asked for these documents, they are supposed to hand them over, of course. | ||
| But did they give any pushback? | ||
| AT ⁇ T, I believe, said that they did in regards to a lot of these phone records that were being requested. | ||
| But, you know, Senator Ran John Ron Johnson's office wants to learn more about this and he's in the position to ask these questions. | ||
| So as of yesterday, the senator's office issuing these requests for more information to find out what the heck's going on here. | ||
| Why do they hand over this information? | ||
| And again, I don't. | ||
| It happens to average Americans every day. | ||
| I don't have any empathy for these lawmakers who are now upset that this happened to them. | ||
| Do you know how hard it was for me when I was over at covering? | ||
| We were traveling with them, Senator John Cornyn's office. | ||
| John Cornyn was there. | ||
| You know, it's really hard for me. | ||
| I've asked them several times. | ||
| They always dodge it as to why John Cornyn's, why John Cornyn continues to defend FISA. | ||
| He's one of the many politicians that pretend like the deep state isn't using FISA courts to go out there and get information from Americans. | ||
| I mean, he sat there and it was so infuriating, decided to use Pam Bonnie's confirmation hearing to highlight the fact that FISA has never been used against an American citizen before. | ||
| He said it was a myth. | ||
| He said it was disinformation. | ||
| That was obviously a lie being pushed by the deep state. | ||
| But he is one of those deep state operatives. | ||
| So it was very hard for me to sit there and not grill him. | ||
| It's not professional for you to grill, you know, when you're in a, you're at Lockheed Martin to hit him with the hard questions like that because you're not allowed to ask him questions during all of that. | ||
| So again, not ideal, not ideal at all, but, you know, I was a little infuriated by this. | ||
| But these are the senators who are going out there and saying, oh, they crossed the line by handing over their information to the special prosecutor Jack Smith's office because they are the ones who should be exempt from all of this. | ||
| They're the ones who should not be spied on by the federal government. | ||
| You guys, you guys are peasants. | ||
| You guys are peasants. | ||
| So now I don't view any of these senators and congressmen as victims because they allow it to happen to so many innocent, innocent individuals. | ||
| All right, guys, buckle down. | ||
| We're getting ready to kick off the third hour of the show. | ||
| Bo French will be jumping in with us today. | ||
| He's running for Texas Railroad Commissioner. | ||
| He's got a lot of titles, but that's the new one that he's hoping to get. | ||
| He'll be joining me in just a few moments to discuss that. | ||
| Plus, we're taking your calls in the second half of the hour, 877-789-2539. | ||
| That's 877-789-2539 is the number you're going to want to call if you want to jump on air. | ||
| And sound off on some of the stories we've covered thus far. | ||
| Back to the American Journal. | ||
| We're excited you're all jumping on with us again. | ||
| Third hour of the program, getting ready to kick it off. | ||
| If you want to join the show, 877-789-2539. | ||
| That's 877-789-2539. | ||
| It's the number you're going to want to call. | ||
| We're going to go over the stories. | ||
| Obviously, that's going to be the main subject, going over the stories that we've discussed thus far. | ||
| And like I promised you, it was a packed show. | ||
| We've gone through a lot so far, and there's more to discuss. | ||
| There's a lot more to discuss. | ||
| So we look forward to doing just that. | ||
| All right, folks, in just a few moments, Bo French will be joining us in regards to the Islamic takeover taking place in Texas, the lies that are being spewed by those on the left in regards to ICE, and so much more. | ||
| So much more. | ||
| Also, Bo Franch is running for Texas Railroad Commissioner, and we look forward to asking him a bit about that because that's a big one. | ||
| And Bo French is a fighter in the great state of Texas. | ||
| So if you are a Texan, this is the guy you're going to want to support. | ||
| So we look forward to asking him too about his campaign because I want to learn more about that. | ||
| And I also want to learn more about the H-1B visas, which are just being given away in northern Texas. | ||
| It's actually devastating when you look at communities like Plano, Irving, Dallas. | ||
| They've been taken over by foreigners, and it's something that is obviously a deeply concerning issue that we could actually control. | ||
| We could actually stop this while we're ahead or a little behind, but we could be optimistic and say while we're ahead. | ||
| Now is the time to do just that. | ||
| I look forward to asking Bo about it. | ||
| There's also a new poll out from Raspbas and Reports, and it says everything that we've been talking about in regards to this Islamic takeover is where Americans, their concerns lie. | ||
| Again, more information coming out, more numbers coming out that 63% of U.S. voters oppose Muslim compounds being built all across the United States. | ||
| We are the majority. | ||
| Don't let them try to tell you and call you a mean, nasty name and make us fear like we're not. | ||
| We are the majority. | ||
| So Bo will be joining us in about four minutes to react to that. | ||
| And I look forward to talking about that with him. | ||
| Also got my eye on a lot of things taking place right now. | ||
| We'll also be taking your calls. | ||
| I want to get this one up too. | ||
| Clip five. | ||
| Kara Cashanova is doing an incredible job. | ||
| We played a clip earlier about her going after Jamie Raskin, but she doesn't stop there. | ||
| This woman is a fighter. | ||
| She is a New Yorker, you know, so I do have my bias there. | ||
| But she's confronting Jasmine Crockett for being an absolute hack. | ||
| Take a listen. | ||
| Miss Crockett, why did you? | ||
| He just pushed me. | ||
| Miss Crockett, why were you crying for Renee Good, but you wouldn't cry for Ashley Babbitt, Miss Crockett? | ||
| You were crying fake tears for Renee Good, but not for Ashley Babbitt. | ||
| This is uh, come on. | ||
| She's right there. | ||
| There's a Miss Crockett who was crying crocodile tears for Renee Goode, but was crying no tears for Ashley Babbitt. | ||
| Ah, you know why I love her? | ||
| Kara, that is. | ||
| She's a fighter, but actually is a fighter. | ||
| She's a trained fighter, and Crockett doesn't want those hands. | ||
| You know, she could be a ghetto hoodrat all she wants when she's in front of CNN and MSNBC cameras, but all of a sudden when she's placed in front of a badass, she doesn't want to, she doesn't want to run her mouth anymore. | ||
| Kara Castranova doing great work confronting the people that are trying to destroy this country and spew nothing but lies. | ||
| And that is the reason why you hear Jasmine Crockett just running the other way, wants no part in Kara Castranova's confrontation there. | ||
| So that was, oh, that was a great chuckle, a great, great chuckle that I was able to get in when I was watching this. | ||
| Also, folks, I don't know if you saw this story. | ||
| Kamala Harris, apparently she's loaded. | ||
| She's loaded. | ||
| Kamala Harris has just apparently upgraded her homes and she's just added a mega mansion to her portfolio in Malibu. | ||
| $8 million. | ||
| Must be nice. | ||
| Her and her hubby have just snatched up a $8 million property, which is about 4,000 square feet, four-bedroom, six-bathroom home. | ||
| And it is in one of the elitist neighborhoods, of course, where all the other Silicon Valley power players are. | ||
| It's how the media will cover that for you. | ||
| But obviously, Kamala Harris purchasing up this land and this home. | ||
| Just another example as, you know, you align with these deep state operatives. | ||
| And even if you lose in an election, they will still have your back and you can become rich too. | ||
| How rich? | ||
| Well, obviously, rich enough to purchase an $8 million home. | ||
| I'd love to see that book deal, by the way. | ||
| That book deal. | ||
| I wonder how much she got in that book deal. | ||
| I bet you, if you follow the money, there might be a reason why she's able to afford an $8 million home. | ||
| Might be. | ||
| Might be. | ||
| All right, guys, buckle up. | ||
| We got more to discuss in just a minute. | ||
| Third hour of the show kicking off. | ||
| And again, we're taking our calls in the second portion of the hour. | ||
| So make sure you call 877-789-2539, 877-789-2539. | ||
| It's an Irish call. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello. | |
| Welcome back to the American Journal of Association. | ||
| Make sure you're all jumping on board with us today. | ||
| All right, a lot happening over here in Texas. | ||
| I want to make sure it's on, I want to make sure it's on your radar. | ||
| I'm really fired up. | ||
| I'm really angry because I love the DFW area. | ||
| I keep talking about it. | ||
| And it's been infiltrated by foreigners. | ||
| Now get it. | ||
| I've been traveling back and forth to DFW for quite some time and I've seen the drastic shift. | ||
| I mean, over the last 10 years, you've seen it. | ||
| If you ever traveled to Irving, Plano, Dallas, a lot of foreigners have made their way in from India and other countries, Middle East. | ||
| It's bad. | ||
| It's bad. | ||
| And they don't even really want to be a part of our community. | ||
| They're physically there, but they don't want to be a part of it. | ||
| And when you go through the numbers as to what's been going on in northern Texas in regards to the foreigners who have infiltrated the visa appointments, which have surged, it's really, really concerning. | ||
| When you look, by the way, it doesn't have those in India very happy. | ||
| If you look at how they're covering all of this with the Trump administration trying to push back a little bit, I mean, I don't think they're doing enough. | ||
| When you look at this, they're pretty much saying that how Indians are stuck. | ||
| Many of them are concerned that they're not being given visas fast enough to come here and take our jobs. | ||
| Now that the Trump administration and the State Department are saying that they're expanding the social media vetting that's been going on. | ||
| That was announced back in December, of course. | ||
| So they're really upset that they can't get these visas fast enough. | ||
| But if you pay attention, if you actually look at this map of how HB1 visas are being dished out, Texas is really concerning. | ||
| Texas is really concerning. | ||
| And the numbers are in the thousands, hundreds of thousands. | ||
| Our communities are being taken over by people that hate us, people that don't want to assimilate, people who come from third world countries. | ||
| And we're just expected to sit here and just take it, deal with it. | ||
| There was a video circulating of a woman who was actually going off on all of this, and she was very fired up on the issue, saying that there's just one law firm that's actually dished out over 700,000 of these. | ||
| And they keep representing, they just keep, they keep helping these people get these visas. | ||
| Joining me to discuss is Bo French. | ||
| He is a candidate for Texas Railroad Commissioner. | ||
| And this is a guy who will not be silenced on this issue. | ||
| He's obviously an outspoken individual who wants the visas to end. | ||
| He wants these imports that are coming from countries that hate us to end. | ||
| And he wants Texas to be returned to Texans, which is a very controversial take these days. | ||
| So it's an honor to have Mr. Bo French on with us. | ||
| And I wanted to get your take on this. | ||
| You know, now it's becoming very trendy to talk about these issues, to talk about the fact that northern Texas is being captured by foreigners and they're utilizing the H-1B visa system to get in. | ||
| And a lot of Americans are fired up over this. | ||
| You know, Rasmussen reports too, just put out a poll also in regards to the Islamists who have been brought into our country. | ||
| And the vast majority of Americans are also siding with the American people on this and not with the people that we've imported. | ||
| 77% of their voters are concerned about the influence that radical Islam has. | ||
| And about 63% of U.S. voters are opposing of the Muslim compounds that are popping up all across Texas. | ||
| So when you sit here and look about how Americans are becoming outspoken on the visa issue, Bo, and when you see the numbers that are coming in about the Muslims who are coming into our country and coming into Texas specifically and how the vast majority of Americans don't support it, are you getting a sense of hope that all of this is gaining the majority support? | ||
| Well, first of all, thank you so much for having me on your show today, Brianna. | ||
| It's great to see you. | ||
| You know, listen, this is something I've been screaming from the rooftops for quite some time. | ||
| I think I was probably the first person that I know of. | ||
| There may have been others, but I was the first person I know of who said, we need to deport 100 million people. | ||
| And I mean, you would have thought that, you know, I'd called for the murder of half the country. | ||
| I mean, it was crazy the response, but you just look at the influx of illegal aliens that we've had long before the Biden administration. | ||
| I mean, there were probably 30 million here before the Biden administration. | ||
| They let in another 20 million people. | ||
| And then, so, you know, that's 50 million right there. | ||
| And then our own government admitted there's over 50 million visa holders, foreign visa holders in our country. | ||
| And I think that most Americans, you know, would have been okay with a few foreigners coming in and working in our system. | ||
| And I don't think that would have been a big deal had the system not been abused. | ||
| But if there's one thing that is just acutely noticeable when you drive around these neighborhoods now that have just been inundated with foreigners, and like you mentioned before, they're not really assimilating. | ||
| And so we have entire neighborhoods that are bringing their third world. culture into America. | ||
| They're not assimilating into our culture. | ||
| And, you know, it's hard to have a nation when people don't assimilate into the culture. | ||
| And I think the thing that really, you know, raises the ire of most people is we've now discovered that, especially like on the Indians, for instance, a lot of the people who've come over, we've noticed that, and even they've uncovered in India these, you know, corrupt mills where they're turning out all kinds of fake documentation. | ||
| So this lie that we were told forever, that we're bringing in people to do jobs that we couldn't find an American to do because these people are more educated or more qualified or whatever the case may be. | ||
| Turns out a lot of them have just fake documents, fake degrees, fake diplomas. | ||
| So we are not really bringing in the best and brightest. | ||
| We're bringing in a lot of low IQ people and they're bringing in their values. | ||
| And, you know, these third world countries, their values are very different than the Western culture, the European culture that, you know, we formed here in America. | ||
| And that's, you know, very much of a high trust society. | ||
| We're not seeing that among these other people. | ||
| Their worldview is whatever I can do that's good for me is the right thing to do. | ||
| Well, that's not an American value. | ||
| And that's what has led to, as we've seen in Minnesota, for instance, with all the Somali fraud. | ||
| That's what's led to this, you know, they're just committing the fraud because they view that as that's what's good for me. | ||
| So therefore, it's the right thing to do, which most Americans find abhorrent. | ||
| But I think what we're going to find out, and God bless these people who are doing some independent journalism here in Texas and uncovering some of the some of the other foreign groups that are doing this, like the Indians with the H-1Bs, et cetera, we're finding that there's massive, massive fraud here as well. | ||
| And I think all of this gets wrapped up if you look at it in the context of this has just been one big scheme by Democrats to import third worlders into our country, to replace Americans, to generate this corrupt money laundering machine so that, yes, some of the money is sent back overseas, obviously, but a lot of it is just to enrich in these people so that they will continue to give to the Democrats who've empowered them to have all of this fraud. | ||
| I think most Americans reject that. | ||
| I know here in Texas, you know, people are freaking out about what we are uncovering here. | ||
| And I think we're going to see some change soon. | ||
| Yeah, and Bill, I want to ask you, because, you know, most people, I think we're second in the country when it comes to these H-1B visas being obtained and people coming here to work. | ||
| Why is Texas so attractive to these individuals? | ||
| That's a great question. | ||
| And I just sum it up this way. | ||
| You know, Texas is really a beacon in the world. | ||
| You know, we have our own identity. | ||
| When I've traveled around the world, the first question they ask me is where I'm from in the United States. | ||
| And when I say Texas, you know, people's eyes brighten up. | ||
| I mean, we really do have a unique identity. | ||
| But so for the people who want to come here, they see this as the pinnacle of being in America. | ||
| It really is the best place to be in America. | ||
| And, you know, I love some of my friends in other states, but Texas really is the best. | ||
| Aside from that, you know, with 30 plus million people, we have the eighth largest economy in the world just in Texas. | ||
| So there is a massive amount of money here. | ||
| You know, it's a huge state. | ||
| There is plenty of opportunity to create these businesses that just hide in plain sight. | ||
| I mean, we don't have a leering center here like they do in Minnesota, but I'm sure we have lots of IT and tech firms that are totally bogus, as we've seen with some of these journalists that are now uncovering 80 H-1Bs, working out of some house for some IT firm or something like that, which is, it's all, it's all nonsense, of course. | ||
| So I think as we dig into this, we're going to find that the fraud is just far greater than what anyone has ever imagined. | ||
| Yeah, and I can't imagine them getting away with that in Texas. | ||
| I know we have an AG here who's a fighter and is going to probably get on this himself and start looking into what's happening there because I saw that post and I said, oh, this isn't going to last long for them, which is a good thing, which is a good thing. | ||
| This all should be looked into. | ||
| There should be a lot of oversight here. | ||
| I kind of want to switch gears a little bit, though, but to stay kind of on the same issue. | ||
| We have an issue with Democrats. | ||
| Democrats are consistently lying to the American people. | ||
| And Tim Waltz, the governor over in Minnesota, is doing just that. | ||
| And he's hoping that the American people are just as stupid as he is when it comes to these lies. | ||
| Take a listen to Clip 16. | ||
| Federal government is raining down upon our communities. | ||
| Two to 3,000 armed agents of the federal government have been deployed to Minnesota. | ||
| Armed, masked, undertrained ICE agents are going door to door, ordering people to point out where their neighbors of color live. | ||
| Okay, so right there, it is just like this fear-mongering campaign that the Democrats continue to push. | ||
| And, you know, Bo, you and I go back and forth sometimes through text, and I'm always flagging these stories for you of these illegal aliens who are in our communities who are committing heinous crimes. | ||
| I mean, these Democrats don't ever talk about that. | ||
| They're constantly talking about that they're just going into homes and gragging people up as if they're just kidnapping people off the streets. | ||
| What do you make of all of this? | ||
| Because again, we saw in Dallas just a couple of months ago, one of their own left-wing terrorists opening fire on vehicles outside of the ICE office in downtown Dallas and killing migrants as they thought were going to be ICE agents instead. | ||
| But we're seeing that they are radicalizing their own base when they use terms like you just heard Tim Waltz use. | ||
| Yeah, everything that Democrats say typically is a projection of what they're actually doing onto Republicans. | ||
| So, I mean, this is a prime example. | ||
| You know, Democrats forever have said, you know, Republicans are the ones inciting violence. | ||
| That speech was a massive incitement of violence against our very own brave law enforcement officers. | ||
| And this notion that they are undertrained. | ||
| I mean, this guy doesn't have any clue what he's talking about. | ||
| This is like just Marxist tactics, you know, trying to divide the community, trying to, you know, generate the impetus for a revolution. | ||
| We are not going to allow communists to have a revolution in America. | ||
| I'm just telling you that right now. | ||
| We are going to stop it. | ||
| But this is what they're doing. | ||
| Obviously, inciting violence against law enforcement officers in and of itself is a crime. | ||
| And I think President Trump is exactly right in considering implementing the Insurrection Act in Minnesota and sending in troops, quelling this violence. | ||
| If you've read Alinsky's book or Clared and Piven or whatever, all of them kind of talk about the same kind of thing, the way you incite violence. | ||
| They don't really, I don't think they're worried about whether or not they hurt an ICE officer, though I think they wouldn't care much about that. | ||
| But their real aim is to have an overreaction or a situation where an ICE officer shoots somebody who's just a protester or something like that. | ||
| And this is what they want. | ||
| They're willing to sacrifice their own people for the greater cause of a Marxist revolution. | ||
| And so that's what they're aiming to do. | ||
| That's what all of these elected officials are aiming to do. | ||
| And I think mainly it is because they're also all just in on it, right? | ||
| I think none of this billions and billions, tens of billions of dollars of fraud in Minnesota would be happening without Tim Walz knowing about it. | ||
| None of it would be happening without Elon Omar knowing about it. | ||
| None of it would be happening without Jacob Frey knowing about it. | ||
| I mean, these people for sure are in on it. | ||
| There's no question in my mind. | ||
| And I think the investigations will bear that out. | ||
| But they should be condemned roundly. | ||
| And, you know, there are good people in Minnesota. | ||
| I know I talk to them frequently and they are scared to death at what's happened. | ||
| You know, they brought in initially 80,000 Somalias, Somalis. | ||
| That was, you know, almost 20 years ago, or more than that now. | ||
| Each one of those women has, you know, six, seven, eight, nine, 10 babies. | ||
| I mean, we're talking half a million people, half a million Somalis now in Minnesota who should have never been there. | ||
| And I mean, it's no surprise that they are taking over. | ||
| They're winning elected office. | ||
| They're laundering money through all kinds of fraud, our taxpayer money, by the way, and it's going back into the pockets of these corrupt elected officials. | ||
| And I mean, has anyone asked the question, where is Ilon Omar? | ||
| Where does her money come from all of a sudden? | ||
| I mean, she in just a few short years has gone from, you know, a five-digit net worth to over $30 million on a congressional salary. | ||
| I mean, there is no way that this is not part of some bigger fraud scheme. | ||
| So I'm behind the administration 100%. | ||
| I'm behind President Trump 100%. | ||
| Send in the military and let's quell this violence. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And I want to talk too about what happened yesterday. | ||
| We saw there was a federal agent who was simply stopping a vehicle of a Venezuelan illegal alien and was trying to apprehend him. | ||
| And this individual fled, assaulted that agent. | ||
| And then two people came out of their homes to help in the assault, according to DHS, even hitting the officer with a shovel. | ||
| I mean, this is insane. | ||
| This is insane. | ||
| And the rhetoric from those on the left continues to justify all of this. | ||
| You know, Bo, I say, and I know it's a little dramatic, but I just always say that I don't see anything that I want, like that we have in common anymore with the left at this point, given the fact that they have been just so aggressive, so radical, and think that it's okay to assault a federal agent while he's trying to apprehend someone. | ||
| What do you make of all of this, though, when we're sitting here watching federal agents being assaulted on a regular basis? | ||
| Even those who are trying to justify Renee Good's actions when she decided to use her vehicle as a weapon and hit an officer. | ||
| I mean, he literally was dealing with injuries related to internal bleeding. | ||
| And still, they're saying that that shooting wasn't even justifiable. | ||
| I don't understand how we even have anything in common with these people if this is their rationale. | ||
| Well, if you understand that their whole motivation is a communist revolution, then you also understand that they don't care about truth. | ||
| They don't care about facts. | ||
| They only care about their narrative, which is why, of course, they rushed out after that first shooting to claim that she was just trying to get away and that she was innocent. | ||
| No, she was a paid agitator, hell-bent on disrupting and impeding federal law enforcement operations, which is a crime. | ||
| That's 15 years right there. | ||
| And then she tried to kill, she tried to run over the officer who was in front of her. | ||
| So this is just something that they're going to do. | ||
| I'll note that the shooting that took place last night was a response to, as you mentioned, three people trying to kill an ICE officer. | ||
| They were beating him with sticks and snow shovels and whatever else was going on. | ||
| And he had no choice. | ||
| It was three on one. | ||
| Of course, he had to defend himself. | ||
| Now, he shot one person in the leg, apparently. | ||
| And then those three people went and barricaded themselves in a residence. | ||
| I mean, this is super dangerous when you talk about elected officials who are supposed to be there protecting and serving the community, instructing people in the community to go to war with law enforcement. | ||
| I mean, this is just pinnacle Marxism. | ||
| And so, you know, I'm confident that, again, the Trump administration is going to do the right thing here. | ||
| That shooting was just, you know, I think 30 minutes after Tim Wall's speech last night. | ||
| So I should say, not the shooting, the attack on the ICE officer that resulted in him shooting to defend himself. | ||
| So again, the left is going to lie. | ||
| They're going to push a false narrative. | ||
| This is just what they do. | ||
| And I think we should expect far more of this until people on our side decide. | ||
| it's enough. | ||
| And what I mean by that is our elected officials need to have the will to do what is right. | ||
| And for far too long, Republicans have just been too worried about being called racist, being called Nazi or whatever. | ||
| I mean, we are well past the time. | ||
| It is time we stand up for America. | ||
| It is time we stand up for our culture. | ||
| We reject this wholly and we crush it. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, that was a great pivot for my next question because you are now throwing your hat into all of this. | ||
| You are running for Texas Railroad Commissioner. | ||
| That election is on March 3rd. | ||
| We look forward to that. | ||
| But I want to get some reasons from you as to why you decided to throw your hat into this because this is a big one for you. | ||
| And I believe this is your first time running for office, if I'm not mistaken. | ||
| Well, it's not the first time, but it's certainly the biggest position that I've run for. | ||
| And I will say this. | ||
| Well, first of all, the Texas Railroad Commission doesn't have anything to do with trains for all my friends who love trains. | ||
| Yeah, that's not the case. | ||
| It regulates the oil and gas industry. | ||
| Texas produces almost half the oil and gas in our nation. | ||
| So it's a hugely important industry in Texas. | ||
| It's our largest and most important industry here in Texas, but it has national security implications. | ||
| Securing our energy is important on the global stage, which is why President Trump is acting in Venezuela. | ||
| It's why there's discussion around Iran, obviously, some of the largest oil reserves in the world between those two countries. | ||
| And so we have to protect what we have here in Texas. | ||
| And I'm running because I'm in the oil business. | ||
| I've been in the oil business most of my career in one capacity or another. | ||
| So I know the business, but that's not as important as what I see is happening under the current chairman of the Railroad Commission, who I'm running against. | ||
| He's massively increased regulation, putting additional burdens and costs on our oil industry, which is fine if you're a multinational corporation, you have teams of lawyers, a little bit of some new regulations and additional expense is not the end of the world. | ||
| But if you're like my father, who was a wildcatter, trying to start in the oil business here in Texas, there's more burden on you now to do that. | ||
| So it makes a less competitive environment, which is dangerous for our energy industry. | ||
| And look, I am focused on an industry that benefits all Texans. | ||
| And another thing that the commission has done under the leadership of my opponent is he's increased the focus on DEI. | ||
| So the Railroad Commission awards contracts. | ||
| They have gone from a couple of years ago to 41st in the state of Texas among state agencies as a percentage of budget spent on DEI to ninth. | ||
| So just in the environment where the rest of America is waking up and rejecting DEI because we understand that it's racist and anti-American, this guy has been increasing the focus on DEI. | ||
| And it just speaks to a couple of things I would say. | ||
| And that is, too often you have elected officials who are just doing it because they have figured out some way to enrich themselves or to gain power or notoriety or whatever that is instead of doing what's right. | ||
| And doing what's right is not letting the bureaucrats underneath you come up with Green New Deal level regulations on our industry. | ||
| Coming up with additional focus on DEI. | ||
| I mean, that's what career bureaucrats do. | ||
| I think we should reject that and actually elect a leader who will say, no more of that. | ||
| We're going to do what's best for Texans. | ||
| We're going to do what's best for Texas and the United States of America and our energy industry. | ||
| We're going to reject DEI, and we're going to make our industry the strongest and best industry in the country. | ||
| Yeah, well, that's what we'd like to hear, Bo. | ||
| So, thank you for that. | ||
| And we look forward to following you as you make your way, hopefully, to this. | ||
| This will be a good one, folks. | ||
| If you want to follow his campaign, head on over right now, BoFrench.com. | ||
| BoFrench.com is where you're going to want to go to to learn more. | ||
| And you're also a great follow-on X as well. | ||
| So, I recommend our audience follow you there. | ||
| BoFrench TX is where you're going to want to go to give him a follow as well. | ||
| Bo, it's always a pleasure to catch up with you, my friend. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| We appreciate it. | ||
| Brianna, great to see you. | ||
| Thank you so much. | ||
| All right, folks, we're keeping our eye on a lot that's going on right now. | ||
| If you want to join the show and sound off on any of the news topics we've discussed so far, the next segment will be your opportunity. | ||
| So, call us 877-789-2539. | ||
| That's 877-789-2539. | ||
| I will also play a very great report that's being done right now by the legendary independent journalist, Miss Savannah Hernandez. | ||
| She's been working hard on a story regarding a New Yorker who is now heading to prison. | ||
| It's a big story. | ||
| I know one close to her heart. | ||
| So, we look forward to playing her report that she just posted. | ||
| It's a good one that you're going to want to listen in on. | ||
| So, we'll do that in the next segment as well. | ||
| Also, I'd like to just talk about it. | ||
| I just saw Chrissy Noam was on Fox just a moment ago talking about the Insurrection Act. | ||
| Now, she just met with the president a few moments ago as well. | ||
| And she came out saying the president obviously is threatening to use it. | ||
| And I spoke with POTUS this morning about several different things, but we did discuss that. | ||
| That certainly is within the president's constitutional authority to utilize the Insurrection Act. | ||
| And so, she did say that obviously the two did talk about it. | ||
| Obviously, if you saw what happened, that is something you're going to want to be utilized at this point because, well, I mean, folks, they're literally going through federal agents' cars stealing firearms, according to Nick Sortor. | ||
| And that's concerning. | ||
| Now, it's also worth noting that Noam did say that that vehicle you see in this video is not a car that is owned by DHS. | ||
| She believes it is an FBI car vehicle. | ||
| So, just keep that in mind. | ||
| But as you can see here, Nick Sortor reporting that there was a rifle stolen from the car, as well as sensitive documents as well. | ||
| Now, we don't know specifically what was outlined in those documents. | ||
| I did see that there was a lefty streamer who was broadcasting it. | ||
| Obviously, I wouldn't do that either because that's not a good thing to do to broadcast those specific details to potentially target law enforcement. | ||
| So, we'll just keep sifting through all the information and bring it to you as it develops. | ||
| But we've got a lot more to discuss in just a bit. | ||
| So, if you don't want to, also if you want to join the show, 877-789-2539 is never the call. | ||
| to take your calls in just a moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Breanna Morello. | |
| Watch it live right now at banned.video. | ||
| We are back with the American Journal. | ||
| See you all jumping on with us. | ||
| We'll get to the callers in just a little bit. | ||
| I wanted to highlight the incredible work that's being done by Savannah Hernandez. | ||
| She does a great job at digging into stories, and she's recently just released a news story in regards to a 67-year-old man who was sadly taken into custody and is about to spend four years in prison. | ||
| This is all because he defended himself. | ||
| So, this is a big, big story that Savannah's been working on. | ||
| And I wanted to make sure it was on your radar. | ||
| So, let's take a listen to clip six. | ||
| This is Savannah Hernandez outside of the Queen's Criminal Courthouse in New York City, where I just attended the sentencing for Charles Foner, the 67-year-old retiree who was just sentenced to four years in prison after defending himself from a 15-time career criminal here in New York City. | ||
| Now, if you're not familiar with the story of Charles, basically back in 2023, a 15-time career criminal with a history of mental illness ended up threatening him and lunging at him. | ||
| Charles, who had a handgun in his pocket, which he had, by the way, because of his fears of rising crime throughout the city, ended up pulling out his weapon, telling this man to stop. | ||
| He did not heed the warning. | ||
| He continued to lunge at Charles. | ||
| Charles opened fire and ended up killing him. | ||
| Now, interesting thing about this case is that the DA of Queen's Melinda Katz did not bring forth homicide or manslaughter charges because even her office agreed that this was a clear-cut case of self-defense. | ||
| However, what they did decide to charge Charles for was criminal possession of a weapon. | ||
| And then after this incident happened, the police went and searched his home and they found what they stated is an arsenal of unlicensed weapons. | ||
| Now I want to say he had about 30 other guns in his home and Charles's attorney stated that Charles has been shooting guns since he was a kid. | ||
| Charles has no criminal history and he has been around guns his entire life. | ||
| However, because he was in New York and these were unlicensed, the DA decided to bring forward these charges. | ||
| Now, something else I want to bring up is there was a case that was very similar to what happened to Charles with a 69-year-old homeless man on a subway in New York who ended up killing somebody in self-defense. | ||
| Now, this homeless man ended up getting attacked by five illegal immigrants and he used a knife to fight off his attackers and he ended up stabbing and killing one. | ||
| Again, Melinda Katz's office decided that this was a clear-cut case of self-defense and decided not to press any charges at all. | ||
| And that case has since been dropped. | ||
| Very similar to Charles's case. | ||
| The main difference here though is of course the weapon used. | ||
| Instead of using a gun to defend himself from criminals, this homeless man used a knife and the DA did not bring forward those charges. | ||
| So I spoke to Charles's attorney who was present today who stated that this is one of the saddest cases that he's ever worked on. | ||
| To understand how this has impacted Charles, here's what he had to say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't think justice was served on the macro level. | |
| You know, we've said consistently, our position is that Charlie is not without fault. | ||
| He possessed firearms that he wasn't lawfully allowed to possess. | ||
| The question is one of proportionality. | ||
| Prosecutors have essentially absolute discretion in these situations. | ||
| They exercised some of that discretion to give Charlie a sentence that was less than what he would have faced at trial. | ||
| They exercised some of that discretion and ultimately not charging you with homicide. | ||
| But the question is whether the ultimate sentence was proportional, whether it was necessary to send someone of Charlie's age, given his lack of history of any violence and the fact of the life he's led to an upstate prison sentence where we continue in this city and other cities throughout the United States to watch recidibious violent offenders given second, third, fourth, fifth chances from the criminal justice system. | ||
| And in Charlie's case, he was not a person of means. | ||
| He's lived a very middle-class, working-class lifestyle. | ||
| As a result of this prosecution, he's had to sell the home that him and his wife had strive for years to finally own. | ||
| His social security benefits, which really, given his age, make up a disproportionate amount of whatever income he has in retirement, will stop while he's in prison. | ||
| And of course, as I alluded to before, there's the psychological emotional enemy that the separation from family. | ||
| I've been practicing law and criminal law for 25 years. | ||
| I've tried cases in Iraq in a courtroom that was where there were explosive devices going on off outside the courtroom. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have never, as a military veteran, I've never seen or been part of a case as sad strategy of this. | |
| Now, the judge in this case stated that Americans have been very vocal about this case, calling her office, leaving voicemails, sending in emails on behalf of Charles. | ||
| However, she highlighted how she was not responsible for the charges brought forward in this case. | ||
| Again, that rested with the DA and her office. | ||
| And basically, they had Charles choose between a trial by jury and up to 25 years in prison for these unlicensed handguns and criminal possession of a weapon, or that he could take this plea deal for a minimum of five years in prison that his attorney actually negotiated down to four. | ||
| So he was officially sentenced today. | ||
| He is now in custody, going to be spending four years in a state prison after defending himself from a career criminal here in New York City. | ||
| And one of the most memorable arguments that his attorney brought forward today in these closing statements was that perhaps Charles would not even have had the opportunity to be on the stand today if he didn't have his gun to protect himself. | ||
| Perhaps it would have been Cody Gonzalez, his assailant with 15 prior arrests and a history of mental illness, who would have been here instead. | ||
| So an idea of what crime is looking like in New York City, what self-defense is looking like in New York City, and of course, what gun rights look like in New York City. | ||
| Oh man, well, great work by Servana Hernandez. | ||
| She's doing incredible reporting. | ||
| And it's just a sad, sad story. | ||
| I mean, as many of you guys know, I left New York back in, I believe it was 2019. | ||
| And it was after reading the legislation that they brought forward, which gives criminals more rights than the actual victims of crime. | ||
| And when I was in situations where I wanted to defend myself, but you can't legally obtain a weapon in New York City, you just go, what am I going to do here? | ||
| And you leave. | ||
| And sadly, this is a gentleman who obviously has done his best for society, has been a law-abiding citizen, and they just shuffle him away to prison for four years. | ||
| Four years, four years. | ||
| An absolute disgrace at the Queen's DAA's office is, I must say, the Queen's DAA office is an absolute disgrace. | ||
| She is a far lefty. | ||
| She's not as far as her opponent, though. | ||
| This was actually a blessing in disguise to get her in there, even though I thought she was awful herself. | ||
| And I know the judge is also claiming, given the fact that this was a plea agreement, that she really didn't have much in the way. | ||
| I don't know if they're able to just sit there and say, no, no, no, we're not even going to give this guy prison time. | ||
| I would hope someone would do that, but man, absolute devastating news in that poor family, what they've had to endure for defending themselves against a low-life criminal that was looking to cause harm. | ||
| All right, folks, let's take some calls right now. | ||
| We're going to try our best to get through all the callers. | ||
| So, first one up, Jake from Missouri. | ||
| Jake, welcome to the show. | ||
| Good morning, Brianna. | ||
| I'd like to take you back a couple of days with Savage Dog and Brian, if you don't mind. | ||
| Yes, let's hear it. | ||
| Savage Dog is also on hold, too, as well. | ||
| Okay, Savage Dog, remember your oath, brother. | ||
| But what did the first Gulf War, which I was in, and the second Gulf War besides the country, have in common? | ||
| Connect the dots. | ||
| Hey, you there? | ||
| Yes, yes, yes. | ||
| Well, I thought you were halfway through it. | ||
| So finish connecting the dots for us. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| What it has in common, Savage Dog kind of touched on Halliburton. | ||
| During the first Gulf War, nobody's ever brought this up before, and I think it's strange. | ||
| The first Gulf War Secretary of Defense was Dick Cheney. | ||
| During the second Iraq deal, who was the vice president? | ||
| Dick Cheney. | ||
| Uh-huh. | ||
| And who? | ||
| Kim Bono. | ||
| Who gained? | ||
| Who won? | ||
| Halliburton, Dick Cheney. | ||
| But nobody's ever connected those dots before. | ||
| Hey, what the heck? | ||
| And like Brian was saying, he couldn't understand why they were there. | ||
| No, Kien Bono, Dick Cheney, Halliburton. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, Jake, we're actually going to bring Savage Dog into the conversation so he could talk with you about this one because he is on hold. | ||
| I think we have Savage Dog. | ||
| Are you in a line? | ||
| Yes, ma'am. | ||
| How are you today? | ||
| We're doing great. | ||
| We're doing great. | ||
| Jake, you know, he's got some points he wants to bring up to you. | ||
| So I figured we'd welcome you into the discussion and get you both on the hold lines together and to chat it up a little bit. | ||
| I hear what you're saying, brother. | ||
| Well, I mean, let's go even further with 9-11, the start of the whole damn thing. | ||
| You know, the whole Bush family and Cheney and all them, you know, the whole thing was all orchestrated. | ||
| There wasn't no sawdusties in any planes. | ||
| No, that's right. | ||
| Dick Cheney was sitting in his office watching it on TV with his shoes off kicked back. | ||
| I mean, it's, yeah, it was all orchestrated. | ||
| It's no-brainer. | ||
| I mean, it's, I don't, I don't really, it's like, it's like saying water's wet. | ||
| I mean, yeah. | ||
| I mean, the whole thing was about money. | ||
| Okay, now we're the big dogs on the block. | ||
| The Soviet Union's falling. | ||
| We got all these weapons. | ||
| We don't now we don't, you know, we don't have a reason to fire them off and produce more. | ||
| Well, let's orchestrate one and let's spend billions and billions and billions of dollars. | ||
| So we got to make more missiles and planes and tanks and upgrade equipment and up armor Humvees. | ||
| And I mean, that's just the way it was. | ||
| I don't know if it will be ever again. | ||
| So many people are waiting out to it, but, you know, 70s. | ||
| I was in 3rd Armored Division. | ||
| And while we were there, they started disbanding 3rd Armored Division. | ||
| Where the hell did all of 3rd Armored Division equipment go means we left it locked up clean and pretty in KKMC? | ||
| Where did it go? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Was it on the highway to hell on the side of the road? | ||
| When I was there in 2005, I rode from Humvee from Kuwait to TQ, I think. | ||
| Anyway, yeah, I saw all the stuff that we bombed out on the way out, you know, on the side of the road. | ||
| I couldn't recognize anything, but either there or maybe it made it to a Turkish bazaar. | ||
| You know, who knows where it went, but it probably got sold. | ||
| Why not? | ||
| Hell, we're not using it. | ||
| We got to sell it to somebody. | ||
| Let's give it to the Kazakhstan. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Which also brings me to the military's audit. | ||
| They're what, $3 trillion down that they can't account for. | ||
| Well, I wonder what a division of Bradley, M1, and all the equipment and Humvees would come to. | ||
| Bro, Afghanistan got a lot of that. | ||
| I mean, that's been the game. | ||
| It's, you know, it's a game. | ||
| It's a game. | ||
| Let's see how much we can rob. | ||
| And we're seeing it, you know, well, hell, let's make some fake learing centers and rob some money. | ||
| I mean, I like to have crapped when I saw that. | ||
| Learing. | ||
| What the heck? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| What else are you going to do with kids when you're a diddler? | ||
| I'd like to shout out. | ||
| I'd like to shout out JDLA and the wood chips. | ||
| They said exactly what they were doing. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, first off, guys, both Jake and Savage Dog. | ||
| Thank you guys. | ||
| This was very entertaining to listen in on. | ||
| I didn't even know we could do this, but we did it. | ||
| Jay, thank you for calling into the show. | ||
| I appreciate you sounding off. | ||
| And Savage Dog, we still have you because I know you were looking to talk about something else. | ||
| I wanted to make sure we got your take on it. | ||
| But Savage Dog, what specifically do you want to come on and talk about? | ||
| Well, I wanted to say I happily got my 7,000 shekel check for promoting us obliterating Iran the other day. | ||
| So I'm sitting here in Mexico where it's warm online. | ||
| I'm in South Georgia freezing off my Michael Hornets. | ||
| Yeah, well, people were a little skeptical of your push for Iran. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I appreciated your take on it. | ||
| I didn't think you were cashing out with Israel. | ||
| Well, you know, I wasn't. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| No, seriously, I mean, it's a no-lose situation. | ||
| But anyway, yeah, but speaking of the weather here, that El Gore was a liar. | ||
| I don't know what he was talking about. | ||
| Global warming. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| All right. | ||
| So my point. | ||
| Have you ever seen the movie Gamer with Gerard Butler? | ||
| I have not seen that movie. | ||
| No. | ||
| Watch it. | ||
| It's one of those predicted programming movies. | ||
| The premise of the movie is that the near future, a Bill Gates type guy, I can't think of his name, Michael Something. | ||
| He was Dexter, Showtime Show. | ||
| But he developed a technology where you had nanotechnology inserted into the back of your neck. | ||
| You're either a receiver or a sender, and you can, if you're poor, then you sell yourself to be a receiver and you basically are in a sim city where some controller controls you. | ||
| And then they upgrade it to where it was like a first-person shooter game where prisoners, in you know, like death row inmates could volunteer to be controlled by somebody in a first-person shooter game, but they're all controlled through this nanotech. | ||
| Well, you know, everybody's wondering, well, you know, these leftists are insane. | ||
| They're absolutely acting so rational and it doesn't make sense. | ||
| Well, you know, five years ago, we had these vaccines that scientists proved were full of smart dust, graphene oxide, which other scientists showed in a Petri dish were being formed into little microchips. | ||
| And, you know, all these purple-haired hose ring big glasses idiots, they all got their 18th boosters. | ||
| And I'm just wondering, you know, and then in 2020, also with a lot or 21 with lockdowns, you had 5G rolling up everywhere. | ||
| And I wonder if, you know, just like I said, a conspiracy butter on the toast. | ||
| Do these were, I mean, I don't know if I don't think the purpose of the shots were to kill or, you know, what do you call it, where you can't give birth. | ||
| Although that was a cool side effect for them, but I think it was to make a zombie army that they could control. | ||
| And so that now there is no rationale reasoning, you know, everybody, how we reason with them. | ||
| I mean, well, we can't. | ||
| Well, you don't. | ||
| Well, maybe that's why. | ||
| You know, it's always interesting and it's always productive to know why. | ||
| This is about the only thing I could think of as to why these people are acting in such a robotic way, irrational way that there is no reasoning. | ||
| Like, well, why did Renee Good? | ||
| You know, why was she, you know, why did she do this? | ||
| Because she was programmed, because she was absent and said, do it, you know, for the, for the globalist communist, satanic world order. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's all I got. | |
| You know, some happy good stuff. | ||
| Well, you know, it's always a pleasure to have you on the show. | ||
| And our audience does love you. | ||
| So Savage Dog, thank you as always. | ||
| We appreciate it. | ||
| And so you're talking about Renee Good too. | ||
| Let's get to Lester, who also wants to talk about Renee. | ||
| Welcome to the show. | ||
| Good morning, Brianna. | ||
| Good morning. | ||
| How are you? | ||
| I'm doing great. | ||
| I want to talk about St. Good for a minute. | ||
| Well, here's what I got a question for you is. | ||
| I got a lot of liberal friends. | ||
| I got a few. | ||
| I mean, I hate to say that, but I try not to, you know, mix friendship and politics. | ||
| But man, I mean, they're coming on my Facebook page. | ||
| Justify it. | ||
| The guy was on ice. | ||
| How did he was able to slip on a sheet of ice and still have a clean shoe? | ||
| Da-da-da. | ||
| It was premeditated. | ||
| I mean, the way I can justify it is when you do not impede with the with the federal warrant. | ||
| That's a court order. | ||
| It's not a warrant. | ||
| A court order to me is stronger than anything, than any warrant you can put out because that judge is ordering the court, an officer of the court, to pick someone up. | ||
| So what say you, Brianna? | ||
| Well, yeah, I don't know. | ||
| I don't, it's, it's kind of crazy. | ||
| And I, and I like how you started it off too, because I was trying to focus on the beginning part of your statement too, as well, about how, you know, we try our best to keep friends who we don't politically agree with. | ||
| I'm not like the left where I cancel them, but it's hard to understand their rationale behind all of this and why they're so aggressive on this front. | ||
| So yeah, yeah, I don't, I don't really know, honestly, Lester, to be blind. | ||
| We're getting into really strange territory here where we have people who are just completely not in the loop on these issues. | ||
| They don't understand these issues or they are just intentionally being fed. | ||
| I mean, they are. | ||
| It's not as they are being intentionally fed bad information. | ||
| So yeah, yeah, I don't know. | ||
| These judges are obviously out of they've gone nuts too. | ||
| And I like how the DOJ, and this is, we could praise the DOJ here too, how the DOJ just recently fired those six employees who decided to say that they were going to leave the agency, but they wanted to go on vacation first and use their bank time because they weren't happy with the DOJ's refusal to open up that civil rights investigation into the agent who did open fire on Renee Good. | ||
| So I think we live in strange times right now where a lot of these people who, you know, we enjoy our friendships with them. | ||
| It's really getting hard. | ||
| It's really getting hard on that front. | ||
| Lester, I heard you had one more thing you wanted to say, though. | ||
| I didn't want to take up too much of the time because we only have about three minutes left. | ||
| And I want to get to somebody else before we go. | ||
| What was that second point you wanted to make? | ||
| I don't really have a second point. | ||
| Like I said, I just, you know, wanted to know, you know, a good basis to argue besides that those protesters should not be within 90 feet of any investigation. | ||
| Okay, 90 feet away from the investigation. | ||
| Sorry, it was hard for me to hear, Lester. | ||
| Yeah, no, I mean, I think that's logical. | ||
| I think that's how it should be, truly. | ||
| So I think you have a valid point there. | ||
| Lester, thank you for calling to the show. | ||
| Greatly appreciate your time and thank you. | ||
| We appreciate that. | ||
| Let's get to Joe in Michigan. | ||
| Joe, I hear you want to talk about AI. | ||
| So, welcome to the show. | ||
| We've got about three minutes left. | ||
| Thanks, Brianna. | ||
| Yeah, I would just want to let you know I really enjoy your program and you're doing a great job here. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| What I wanted to do was focus on the AI situation that you kind of, you said you weren't too sure about it and blah, blah, blah. | ||
| Well, the thing is that we have to basically, we're three, four steps behind China right now. | ||
| And someone's always told me if you ain't one step ahead, you're two steps behind. | ||
| Because of the fact is that they are controlling all the rare earth minerals right now. | ||
| And this is one reason why we are going into Greenland, so we can get the rare earth minerals, so we can start building our own ships and that we can start putting in the data centers. | ||
| Because the AI is very important right now to the national security of our country, because China has figured out through the AI and quantum computing that they can control everything and that is through, like the QR code. | ||
| I don't know if you remember a few years back where they had Pokemon Go, okay, and people were walking around looking for the Pokemon. | ||
| Well, the Pokemon Go is based on the game Go. | ||
| And there was a program that they aired November 5th, 2019 called, and I really want you to go watch this. | ||
| It's on YouTube, In the Age of AI. | ||
| And it'll give you a whole perspective of what is being planned, what is going on now, and what's going to go on in the future. | ||
| And it talks about medical, it talks about transportation. | ||
| And actually, the Chinese are putting in 10% more data in AI than we are right now. | ||
| And they're like the Saudi Arabia where they were the head of the oil and energy boom. | ||
| Well, China is going to be ahead of the technology boom. | ||
| There's going to be an American tech center, tech, American tech, and a Chinese tech. | ||
| And the more data that goes into the AI, the better it works. | ||
| And they could basically figure out way ahead of time if they want to invade a country or they want to go around and do their things around the world with their belt and road initiative, that they just plug in the program and then they can figure out what the results are going to be in a matter of probably minutes. | ||
| So we've basically been captured here already. | ||
| And through facial recognition, that's going to be another big thing when you go in the airport and we take your picture. | ||
| And if you say, yeah, well, then once they take your picture, that's it. | ||
| You are biomedically already in their database. | ||
| And they can, you know, and like what you said, you couldn't figure it out. | ||
| And why they wanted to get out. | ||
| And a lot of people can't figure out why they got to get these data centers up is because if we don't, China's going to just take us over to which they've already got us. | ||
| Yeah, well, that's what they're saying, Joe. | ||
| Thank you for calling in. | ||
| We appreciate your insight on that, folks. | ||
| The Ox Jones show starts next. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Methylene blue is now my... | |
| No way, you evil scum. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Methylene blue is for everyone. | |
| We're gonna make it, men! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now look here. | |
| Even to this very day, I still have my trusty old trench knife from the war. | ||
| Order now at At the Alex JonesStore.com. |