All Episodes
Dec. 1, 2025 - American Journal - Breanna Morello
02:37:16
The American Journal: Trump Goes Scorched Earth On Third World Immigration, Halts Asylum Claims & Says All Biden Autopen Actions Will Be “Terminated” - FULL SHOW - 12.01.2025
Participants
Main voices
b
breanna morello
01:51:56
m
mark lucas
06:42
Appearances
a
alex jones
01:24
d
donald j trump
03:24
d
donald trump-jr
02:51
j
james comey
01:00
j
jillian michaels
01:52
j
jon bowne
02:07
k
kash patel
01:33
k
kristen welker
01:00
k
kristi noem
01:40
m
mark kelly
03:03
t
ted cruz
01:31
t
tom homan
01:22
Clips
c
catherine herridge
00:45
d
dana bash
00:19
i
ilhan omar
00:08
j
jan jekielek
00:38
k
karoline leavitt
00:33
m
marco rubio
00:59
m
mike davis
00:21
o
omar fateh
00:08
p
pam bondi
00:43
t
tim walz
00:32
w
will cain
00:18
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
ilhan omar
Somalis are not terrorizing this nation.
We are helping it thrive.
Somalis have always seen themselves as the fabric of this nation.
donald trump-jr
As many of you know, Minnesota is drowning in fraud.
jon bowne
In Minnesota, a state with the largest Somali immigrant population in the United States, extensive welfare fraud schemes have siphoned billions of taxpayer dollars from federal and state programs, primarily orchestrated by members of the Somali community.
The most notorious case, Feeding Our Future, involved fake nonprofits submitting bogus meal claims during the COVID-19 pandemic, defrauding over $250 million in child nutrition funds.
unidentified
The brazen scheme of staggering proportions.
The largest pandemic fraud in the United States.
The subjects in this case weren't interested in Feeding Our Future.
They were interested in feeding their own gluttony.
We have new details on a jury tampering scheme at the center of a major fraud case.
Federal prosecutors indicted five people for their roles in offering a juror $120,000 for a not guilty verdict in the Feeding Our Future fraud scheme.
The U.S. attorney says the group targeted juror 52 because she was the youngest juror and appeared to be the only juror of color.
According to court documents, they dug up information on her family online and even put a GPS tracking device on her car to track her whereabouts.
During their investigation, investigators uncovered a video of one of the defendants leaving a bag of money at the juror's home.
jon bowne
Similar scams have targeted Medicaid's autism services, where providers inflated diagnoses among Somali children, jumping from $3 million in spending in 2018 to $399 million in 2023.
unidentified
According to the charging documents, Hassan worked with others to recruit families from the Somali community, whether kids had autism or not.
Prosecutors write that there was no child that smart therapy was not able to get qualified for autism services.
Then, to drive up enrollment, they paid monthly kickbacks to families between $300 to $1,500 per child.
Prosecutors say Hassan and her partners paid for it all through the millions worth of fraudulent Medicaid claims.
will cain
It didn't matter if the kids had autism.
And what happened?
Autism claims to Medicaid surged in 2018, $3 million.
By 2023, listen here, from $3 million to $400 million.
jon bowne
While housing stabilization programs created fictitious companies to build for non-existent services.
unidentified
At the August trial for Abdi Fatah Yousuf, the jury heard evidence that he ran his home health care company Promise Health out of a mailbox at a Central Avenue address where multiple other home health care companies were supposedly located.
Youssef and his wife Lol Ahmed were charged with stealing $7.2 million of taxpayer money through Medicaid overbilling in a personal care assistant or PCA scam.
Despite the jury swiftly convicting Yousaf, Judge Sarah West last week decided they got it wrong.
Judge West ruled that the state's case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence.
Jurors in the case can't believe the decision.
I am shocked.
I'm shocked based off of all of the evidence that was presented to us and the obvious guilt that we saw based off of the said evidence.
It was not a difficult decision whatsoever.
jon bowne
Federal prosecutors led by acting U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson have issued 77 indictments in the Feeding Our Future case alone, with additional charges in autism and welfare fraud totaling at least 28 scandals since 2019, amounting to an estimated $1 billion in losses.
These frauds extend beyond mere theft, with investigations revealing that millions of the stolen funds were funneled back to Somalia through informal Hawaii networks, ultimately supporting the al-Qaeda-linked terrorist group Al-Shabaab.
Some defendants in the Feeding Our Future case donated to prominent Democrats, including Attorney General Keith Ellison and lobbied figures like Representative Ilhan Omar and former Senator Omar Fateh, who advocated for the programs.
omar fateh
And I want to thank also Amy and her team, Feeding Our Future, for making this first court victory a reality.
jon bowne
Things are heating up as President Trump terminated temporary protected status for Somalis in Minnesota on November 22nd, 2025, labeling the state a hub of fraudulent money laundering.
Under Waltz's watch, John Bowne reporting for InfoWars.
unidentified
Different location today.
breanna morello
We're in Washington, D.C., swamp territory.
Got a lot to cover here, of course.
As many of you know, as an independent journalist, I've just recently been credentialed to cover the Pentagon.
And so here I am getting ready for a very interesting week ahead.
So thank you for jumping on with us.
A lot going on over here.
We're excited that you're here.
You're joining us.
We're going to dig into a lot of different topics, obviously, folks.
Now, again, it was a holiday week, so we missed out on a lot.
I'm going to catch you up on all of the important things as well.
I wanted to remind our audience, too, that we are live, of course, on our InfoWars X page, as well as my Twitter page, too.
So make sure you give both a follow.
But we're going to kick things off by recapping the devastating news that took place in Washington, D.C., just a few days ago.
As many of you guys know, there was an Afghan terrorist who made his way to Washington, D.C. and committed an absolutely heinous crime, shooting two West Virginia National Guardsmen.
Now, sadly, one of those guardsmen, Becca Strumman, has passed away.
She was 20 years old and just was just sworn in prior to all of this.
It's an absolute devastating story, of course.
But it doesn't end there.
There is still a second guardsman fighting for his life.
Andrew Wolfe, we're told that he is expected to survive, it looks like.
Thank God.
And we have been praying for him and his family at the White House yesterday, saying that they've invited both families to the White House to meet President Donald Trump, obviously.
But folks, this was preventable.
This was preventable.
And we're going to be digging into all of this throughout today's show, of course.
So just something to keep in mind.
But again, this was a so-called 29-year-old Afghan refugee.
Now, keep in mind, they always say how old they are, but it doesn't mean that's their actual age.
A lot of these individuals came in.
They didn't have documents to verify who they were.
And we only have what they told us to go off of.
Now, as many of you guys know, Joe Biden and the members of the Biden regime, obviously leading a horrific exit from Afghanistan back in 2021.
And it was so egregious.
It cost obviously the lives of several service members because he was just so incompetent to be able to lead that exit.
And on top of everything, we took in thousands and thousands of unvetted Afghan refugees.
And I kind of want to just toss out the unvetted argument later in the show.
We'll talk about that and why.
The unvetted argument, whether they're vetted, unvetted, it doesn't even matter anymore.
We're learning more and more about this shooter, and he is somebody who apparently didn't have any red flags.
Now, this is a red flag for our audience, at least.
When he was in Afghanistan, according to reports, he assisted U.S. forces, including the CIA, in Afghanistan.
That's very, very concerning, of course.
So, this is someone who worked with the CIA.
Now, the details in regards to what he was doing are quite limited, of course.
We're going to keep digging into that and bring you the latest as we learn more about his background.
Now, yesterday, President Trump spoke openly about how he's reached out to both of the guardsmen's families.
Take a listen to clip one.
catherine herridge
The next rooms to the White House.
donald j trump
Yeah, I do.
I do.
I've already suggested it.
I said, when you're ready, because that's a tough thing.
Come to the White House.
We're going to honor Sarah.
And likewise, with Andrew, recover or not, we're going to honor.
unidentified
And Mr. President, one more question about Wickoff.
breanna morello
Now, they are going to hopefully make their way to the White House very, very soon.
And guys, the goal here, the left is sitting here and they're constantly going after President Trump's decision to bring the Guardsmen into D.C.
Now, obviously, they're here because they're supposed to be making it safer, something Democrats were unable to do, and that's intentional, of course.
And so, right now, we have this massive, massive issue.
We have an issue right now with Democrats now criticizing President Trump for simply trying to make DC safe and bring the Guardsmen in.
Now, the Attorney General Pamboni yesterday in clip two spoke openly about the Guardsmen and what their role is here and how they're not going to back down anytime soon.
In fact, they're going to be stepping up and bringing the National Guardsmen to states and cities all over the country.
Take a listen.
pam bondi
Working hand in hand with Secretary Noam, Homeland Security.
Director Pattelle has already arrested 500 suspected terrorists since January 20th.
We're working hand in hand with Pete Hegseth.
And yes, we are bringing in our National Guard to every city we possibly can who needs our help.
And that's a lot of them.
We're tied up, as you know, in a lot of court hearings right now.
These young men and women in the guard, they want to help our country.
They want to be here.
They are patriots, yet they will not be attacked by a radical Islamic terrorist who screams by reports, Ali Akbar, before shooting two of our guard members and almost killing more.
breanna morello
Almost killing more.
Thank God he was unable to do just that.
Other brave guardsmen jumping in to block him from creating an insane, insane catastrophe.
And I also want to shift gears over to the angle in regards to the vetting process.
Now, here's something that I think is very, very interesting.
Christy Noam, the DHS secretary yesterday on clip three, came out and she said that this was somebody who acted alone.
Now, let's keep in mind, folks, we have right now DHS, we have Pam Bonnie, we have the FBI, all saying that this individual was radicalized here on U.S. soil.
And somehow, some way, they're now telling us in clip three that he acted alone.
Take a listen.
kristen welker
Do you know what the motive was at this point?
Do you believe the suspect acted alone?
kristi noem
You know, we're still going through all of that information, and I'll let the FBI and DOJ reveal new information.
But I will say we believe he was radicalized since he's been here in this country.
We do believe it was through connections in his home community and state.
And we're going to continue to talk to those who interacted with him, who were his family members, talk to them.
So far, we've had some participation, but anyone who has information on this needs to know that we will be coming after you and we will bring you to justice.
We absolutely will persecute you because we do know that we will never allow this to continue to happen in our country.
Allow individuals who came to our country that were unvetted by Joe Biden, allowed to run free and loose.
We are going to bring them to justice and make sure that they're returned out of this country if they aren't here for the purposes of being an American.
breanna morello
Folks, she continues to use the words unvetted, and we're going to get to that because, regardless if they're vetted or unvetted, it's quite obvious that this individual, like they say, was radicalized here on U.S. oil.
So, why are we bringing them here in the first place?
Serious question that needs to be examined.
And if you're reading the mainstream media right now, brace yourself.
They want empathy for the suspect.
In fact, the Associated Press, which usually does actually do fluff pieces for Islamic terrorists quite often, release the very latest story.
They are saying that the individual, obviously the suspect, was someone who was dealing with mental health issues, that he was not functioning as a person, father, or provider since March of 2023.
They also add that he quit his job just the month before and he had behavioral issues as well.
And they describe the change as greatly.
He changed greatly, is what they're kind of diving into there.
Now, this source is asking to be anonymous, and the Associated Press did let them remain anonymous, but they keep going and saying that he sometimes had manic issues, manic episodes, they added.
He would take off in his family car, drive nonstop.
Once he went to Chicago, another time went to Arizona.
I wonder why.
I wonder why.
Folks, it's not just a manic break when you drive all the way to Washington, D.C. with a gun and you shoot two guardsmen just 24 hours after they took the oath.
You shoot him in the head.
This is not someone who just had a manic break.
This is someone who obviously is an Islamic terrorist.
There's no other way to look at this.
And our government hopefully doesn't want to add the fluff to it, but we've had enough of this.
We've had enough.
The Associated Press and other outlets, even the New York Post, putting out stories, trying to get you to garner some empathy for this individual.
I lack empathy for people like this.
In fact, all my empathy is with the actual victims of this crime.
They didn't have to have this happen to them.
They did nothing.
Nothing.
And it's gut-wrenching that we continue to go over all of this time and time again.
Today, on today's show, let me remind you: I have been going after the federal government trying to get answers in regards to the Afghans that were brought into our military bases all across the country.
Many of you guys know there was a massive effort, also known as Operation Allies Welcome, where thousands of Afghans were brought into our country and we've been screaming about it for months now.
We didn't know who these people were.
They quickly jumped on planes, and because it was so chaotic, nobody cared.
They brought them right in to the United States.
And so, although he said, here we bicker back and forth, vetted, unvetted, vetted, unvetted, the reality of it is sometimes you can't even vet these people appropriately.
That's something in clip five.
You're going to hear Tom Holman say, and he's very, very clear: there is no system in place to actually screen these people.
Because guess what?
Do you think Afghanistan ever created a database of their terrorists?
Absolutely not.
Absolutely not.
Take a listen to the border czar, Tom Holman, and how he details just that.
tom homan
Understand.
And these third world nations, they don't have systems like we do.
So a lot of these Afghanistans, when they did get here and get vetted, they had no identification at all.
Not a single travel document, not one piece of identification.
And we're going to count on the people that run Afghanistan, the Taliban, to provide us any information who the bad guys were or who the good guys are.
Certainly not.
And many people need to understand that most terrorists in this world, most of them, aren't in any database.
Because unless they were found on a battlefield by the DOD and the retina scan and did some biometrics there, unless you're part of a T3 undercover investigation, we don't know who they are.
So, and the same thing with illegal ambience, the over 10 million that came across the border of Joe Biden.
There's no way to vet these people.
You think El Salvador or Turkey or Sudan or any of these countries have the databases or system checks that we have?
Do you think the government of China, Russia, Turkey, you think they're going to share that data with us, even if they did have it?
There's no way to clearly vet these people 100% that they're safe to come to this country from these third world nations.
President Trump's doing the right thing, reviewing every one of these people who came under the Biden administration and drilling down on them.
I really, truly think that most of them are going to end up being deported because we're not going to be able to properly vet them.
breanna morello
There's no way to properly vet them.
You heard Tom Homan say it.
Why the heck do we bring them here?
Why the heck do we still have them living here?
There's no way to tell who's a terrorist and who's not.
And that is the reality going on right now.
Even Christy Noam has said it to you guys before, and not just her, Pam Bondi as well.
So folks, it continues to get worse and worse.
The New York Post actually broke this exclusive over the weekend and it's a very, very interesting exclusive, one that is worth your attention.
Take a look at this.
The numbers are absolutely insane.
Somehow, some way, the New York Post got their hands on a document from DHS.
And in that document, it says that there's more than 5,000 Afghans brought into the United States from the withdrawal that got flagged for national security issues.
National security issues.
In all, the Fed's uncovered potentially almost 7,000, we'll say, 6,868 people who came in from Afghanistan as part of Joe Biden's Operation Allies Welcome Program, people who were very threw up a lot of red flags in their system, we could say.
And when it came to public safety concerns, there was about 956 of those people and 876 were flagged for fraud, according to the data that's been provided to the New York Post from DHS.
And if you're wondering what happened, what happened when we brought these people into our country, well, one would assume, given the fact that we just saved them from the Taliban, that they'd be grateful.
According to reports from back to, well, back in 2022, Afghan refugees caused about $260 million in damages while living on our military bases.
Our military bases house over 120,000 Afghans, and they somehow, someway caused $260 million in just damages alone.
Now, again, that information comes from a Pentagon report.
If you're wondering what they did to cause all of that, well, they vandalized the place, broken furniture, exhausted the stockpiles, blocked the plumbage systems.
This is the kind of people who we brought into our country.
And obviously it was hidden.
People like Dan Crenshaw, though, wanted our country to speed up the vetting process.
It was just on earth, thanks to Ken Webster.
This letter from the so-called Republican congressman from the great state of Texas, in this letter, he is asking, of course, DHS to speed up the vetting process.
Let them all in.
And his wish was their command.
The Biden administration, according to their own archive DHS website, did just that.
They waited to filing fees and introduced an expedited process for Afghan nationals who were granted, obviously, this parole period within the United States back on July of 30th of 2021.
So we helped push these people into our country.
And this is according to our own DHS website.
This isn't a big conspiracy theory.
The Biden regime intentionally pushed these people forward.
And all of the luxuries that you and I both would never have, they received.
They received.
They were given an expedited process and they were shuffled into this country quickly.
It literally says steamlined, folks.
I can't even get it.
Let's pull it up.
Streamlined.
I mean, this is what they were doing.
They weren't even hiding this.
This is straight up from the DHS website, folks.
Archived.
Streamlined processing for Afghan nationals.
This document dated November 8th, 2021.
This is what they were doing.
Now, again, the numbers, the data, all horrific.
All horrific.
But it's not surprising.
And folks, for years now, I have been trying my very best to dig into the numbers regarding crime.
And we're going to do that in just a little bit.
But first, you know, we have Mark Lucas joining us, and I want to get his take on it because we had him on the show a couple of months ago.
And I don't know if you saw the clip.
It's actually gone viral.
He actually reminded us of it when he detailed what he witnessed when he was in Afghanistan and serving and how he had to protect white female service members because those in Afghanistan were looking to assault them.
Again, we're going to have him on the show to detail what he experienced and have us have him walk us through it.
And then I want to bring up a great point in regards to what happened when we shuffled these individuals onto our military bases.
unidentified
Well, violence surged.
breanna morello
We were learning about all of the violent attacks that took place on these military bases, such as sexual assaults of children, of women.
And then after we reached at least six cases that were publicly available for us to see, all of a sudden it stopped.
But did those assaults actually stop?
Well, that's one question I have for our Pentagon.
And I look forward to asking that in person this week, of course.
We're going to dig into this.
We're not letting these cases go away.
And as infuriating as it is, and because these are our friends, so we do have some type of empathy and we don't want to be cruel.
But I've been asking the FBI about this for quite some time now.
And unfortunately, even this weekend, after I gave them an extensive amount of time to respond to me in regards to the female U.S. service member who was assaulted on their military base, the FBI leading the investigation.
Well, unfortunately, the FBI saying they don't have any information to give me on that.
It's been four years and our own FBI can't seem to tell me what the heck happened there.
They were the lead agency in charge of investigating this assault by a group of Afghan men and one of our female service members.
And still to this day, I've submitted several FOIA requests.
I've reached out to the FBI several times, including under this new leadership.
And because they're friends, we have done our very best to extend time and time again the arm of just leniency and ask them, please, can you just give me an update?
Is not going to look good for you if you do not give us some type of update as to where your investigation stands.
Where are those men?
Were they released into the United States?
Well, I'm going to detail it all for you, but they will not give me anything.
In fact, that email is from 2024 when they told me FOIA requests, submit your FOIA request.
I submitted the FOIA request.
They turned me down then and said, no, sorry, no FOIA request.
Can't do anything there.
It's a privacy issue, is what they told me.
It's a privacy issue.
And so under this new leadership, I asked their media relations team again.
And sadly, this weekend, after telling them you're not being transparent like you committed to, they still will not tell me what's going on here.
We have that email too.
They're just saying no comment.
So we're going to dig into that in the second hour of the show because there's a lot of exposing to do there.
Plus, I don't think a lot of people realize, but there was an Afghan man who even shot at police last year and he lost his life.
But the words, the message he had prior to the shooting tells you everything you need to know.
We're going to play that clip for you as well.
A lot to dive into, obviously, today, folks.
If you haven't done so already, head on over to the alexjonesstore.com right now.
We've got so many incredible items on sale, and it's just in time, obviously, for the holidays.
So if you're looking to get a great gift for your loved ones, this is the time to do so.
We have the Cyber Monday deal going on right now, 60% off the entire site, lasts about another 15 hours.
So stop what you're doing now, stock up, head on over to the alexjonesstore.com.
So many of your favorite items now on sale on prices.
We've actually never seen prices this low before.
So head on over right now, the alexjonesstore.com.
Also, if you haven't done so already, the best way to stay in touch with us in case we do, you know, have to change over to the cruel people looking to take over Infowars and silence our voices.
You got to head on over and download the app, alexjonesapp.com.
That's alexjonesapp.com.
That is how you stay in touch with us, of course, and how we continue this information war because their attempts to silence us will not, well, they won't land.
We won't let them do that.
And folks, we have Mark Lucas, like I told you, coming onto the show to detail what he witnessed specifically in Afghanistan.
And plus, he's going to react to the very latest in Venezuela as well, because President Trump issuing a very stern warning for Nicholas Maduro, get out or we'll force you out.
That's what it sounds like is taking place.
So we look forward to having that discussion with Mark Lucas as well in just a few moments.
He's joining me in the next segment.
We're also keeping your eye, of course, on the White House right now.
There's a press briefing scheduled for 1 p.m. Eastern time, and President Donald Trump's expected to sign congressional bills at 4 p.m. Eastern time today as well.
That is what is on the agenda for today.
Also, folks, tomorrow's show, we got a packed house here.
A lot of your favorite members on the Hill, and I know we don't have many, but we've got a very limited amount of freedom fighters.
They're going to be joining me in studio tomorrow.
A lot to unpack there.
I will not be hosting American Journal.
I'm actually swapping with Harrison Smith.
Harrison will be filling in for me on American Journal while I will be flipping on over to the war room.
And we will have a packed house of your favorite, favorite politicians.
And I know a lot of us don't have a lot of favorite politicians.
I can promise you, these are the really, really good ones.
Like Congressman Troy Nels will be joining me.
And as many of you guys know, Troy Nels just announced that he will not be seeking re-election.
Now, he's been the freedom fighter on a lot of fronts, specifically January 6th.
And so the fact that he is bowing out has me a little concerned.
I look forward to having that discussion with him tomorrow and bringing him in.
So a lot going on over here.
We're doing our very best to keep you up in the know, of course.
Don't go anywhere.
Mark Lucas joining me in just a moment.
unidentified
We are coming to you live from Swamp Territory here in Washington, D.C., live from the Rumble studio.
breanna morello
And we are very thankful that Rumble has allowed us to use their sets to bring you the American Journal today.
Obviously, a lot happening all across the country.
We were following that story regarding that Afghan terrorist that drove all the way to D.C. to shoot two guardsmen.
The story, the details are absolutely horrific.
We'll bring Mark Lucas in just a second.
He is obviously a veteran and he knows Afghanistan very, very well in regards to who these people are that we've brought in.
And so I've got a lot of serious questions that we need to ask in regards to that.
But most importantly, folks, I wanted to make sure we kept you in the loop.
I just got an alert in regards to Alina Haba.
As many of you guys know, she is the interim U.S. attorney in New Jersey.
Well, an appellate court just found just a few moments ago that she's unlawfully serving as the top prosecutor in New Jersey, delivering a blow to the Trump administration, obviously, as he fights to keep her in her place as one of his preferred nominees.
The Trump administration could ask for a full panel of third circuit judges to reconsider this decision, or it could turn to the Supreme Court to weigh in.
And we're going to keep our eyes on that, of course.
But that news just dropping moments ago.
Alina Haba, things not looking good for her over in New Jersey.
But let's bring things back to DC.
As many of you guys know, this week we are actually, today and tomorrow, I'm going to be bringing you the show from DC.
I've been credentialed as an independent journalist to cover the Pentagon.
And that is exactly what we are doing here.
And I've got a lot of questions to ask both the Secretary of War, Pete Hedseth, as well as the press secretary for the Pentagon, Kinsley Wilson.
We look forward to doing that.
Plus, I've got a ton of exclusive interviews that we're going to be bringing to you and releasing on Thursday morning with some incredible officials over at the Pentagon, some friends, some new faces.
And I look forward to bringing you that again.
That will be Thursday morning.
Just to give you a programming note tomorrow, though, Harrison Smith filling in for me.
I will be hosting War Room tomorrow.
We have a ton of just great people joining me on the sets here in DC tomorrow for War Room.
So we're excited to bring that to you.
But let's bring things back down to the Afghan issue, the issue that we've been talking about throughout today's show.
As many of you guys know, the Biden regime shuffled in thousands of thousands of individuals, both vetted and unvetted, as they claim.
And these individuals are turning out to be our worst nightmare.
These are people who, although they claim to work with us while we were fighting over in Afghanistan, a lot of these people weren't actually working with us.
No, no, they weren't.
We're learning more and more about this.
And according to the New York Post, I want to get this up and I want to keep drilling this point home because this is just a very small portion of the issue.
The Biden regime working aggressively hard to hide all the facts from us.
So we didn't know how awful the people they brought in were.
According to the New York Post, they looked and obtained a DEHS document, which said that there were more than 5,000 Afghans brought into the United States after the failed withdrawal that were, quote, national security issues, national security issues.
That is a key point to all of this.
Now, when you see the numbers getting, you know, kind of broken down a bit, it really highlights a very clear issue.
5,005 apparently had these national security concerns.
956 of those people had public safety concerns.
And 876 were flagged for fraud, for fraud.
So when the media reports on this terrorist who attacked these two guardsmen in Washington, D.C. last week, and they tell you, oh, he's 29 years old, and they give you background.
You actually don't even really know his age.
You don't even know his age.
And he doesn't look 29 years old.
He could tell you whatever he wants to tell you because the reality of it is nobody asked for documents.
They didn't have documents.
They let him in anyway.
I've been reporting on this in regards to not just Afghans, but illegal aliens coming into our border.
Christy Noam, the obviously DHS secretary in Clip 25, detailed that a lot of these individuals being brought in were vetted and unvetted.
But this is very clear for the American people to understand.
Listen to her words, and I'll tell you why in just a moment.
Take a listen.
kristen welker
I just want to be very clear about this because his asylum was approved in April of this year on the Trump administration's watch.
So just to be very clear, was there a vetting process in place to approve that asylum request?
kristi noem
Yeah, the vetting process all happened under Joe Biden's administration.
kristen welker
Was he vetted when he was granted asylum?
Are you saying he wasn't vetted when he was granted as a vetted?
kristi noem
Vetting asylum?
Vetting is happening when they come into the country, and that was completely abandoned under Joe Biden's administration.
That's the irresponsibility that has completely devastated our country, Kristen, put us in such a dangerous position.
I don't think people realized when Joe Biden was in the White House exactly how he was allowing our country to be infiltrated with people that we didn't know who they were.
Some of them we did know were dangerous and we went after as soon as they came into this country.
But under this program, we could have up to 100,000 people that came in from Afghanistan that may be here to do us harm.
President Trump is absolutely dedicated to getting them out of our country.
breanna morello
That's the key point to all of this, folks.
Listen, we could sit here and say vetted, unvetted.
The reality of it is they're telling us that this individual who they shuffled in just recently was granted asylum, that he was someone who didn't have any severe red flags that would have thrown up in the system that would have stopped him from getting asylum.
So does it even matter anymore when we sit here and go back and forth and say vetted, unvetted, vetted, unvetted?
At this point, I don't even know if you could trust any of them.
Joining me to discuss is Mark Lucas.
Obviously, many of you know him because he's a frequent guest on this program.
He is the founder of Veteran Action, and he is an ally to us, of course.
And we're honored to have him on the program today.
I want to thank Mark for being here.
Mark, thank you for joining me.
We're kind of digging into a lot of this and we're trying to dig into how this even happened in the first place.
But I want to get to the core argument here.
We continue to hear individuals say vetted and unvetted, but the reality of it is, is the suspect in this case is someone who they said wasn't radicalized until he arrived here on U.S. soil, that he worked with the CIA prior in Afghanistan, and then all of a sudden became radicalized here in the United States.
So does it even matter if we vet these people in the first place?
mark lucas
These Afghans are unvettable.
I served in Afghanistan in 2010 as an infantry rifle platoon leader, and we were tasked to partner with the Afghan national security forces.
And I'll tell you, one of the greatest threats I faced every single day wasn't from al-Qaeda or the Taliban or Haqqani.
It was from my Afghan partners.
We could not trust these people.
I had to have in these key leader engagements where I would meet with Afghan elders, also just in regular meetings that I would have with Afghan officers.
I would always have to have one of my squad leaders over my shoulder, holding his weapon in the low ready, watching the hands of all of my so-called allies.
These people, we could not trust them.
Many of the missions I would go on, when we were ambushed, it was because my partners were tipping off our location to the enemy.
I had to conduct a named operation, which what that means is a significant operation to go after a high value target.
We had to bring our Afghan partners.
That was forced upon us from our military leadership that we could not leave the wire without an Afghan partner.
We had to confiscate all the cell phones 24 hours before we loaded aircraft to take out this target building.
And even when we got on the objective, we were greeted by Afghan village elders waving their hands at us because they had been tipped off that we were coming in early.
So when you look at these Afghan people coming into our country, I say to people, they are unvetted.
We didn't know who we were serving with, but we'd give them weapons, we'd give them uniforms, and we just hoped that they would fight a mutual enemy.
breanna morello
Yeah, and that's the big problem here because I keep hearing these stories time and time again.
There's a clip of Sean Parnell, who obviously now works over at the Pentagon.
I'll be meeting with him and sitting down with him to do an interview on this circulating about these individuals, how one of his troops, his fellow service members, was killed in his platoon because of their interpreter and because they were intentionally tipping off the enemy.
And so this is a real, real issue.
And it was always concerning because, you know, my dad served in Vietnam and he believed one of our greatest failures was to not save those who helped them while they were fighting in Vietnam.
But it doesn't seem to be the same way here in Afghanistan.
It seems like a lot of these people like you just detailed, you just outlined, although they were supposedly helping us, weren't actually helping us at all.
And they were also working for the enemy.
So it's a very, very serious and concerning issue and one that has me wondering, well, who the heck did we let into our country in the first place?
I mean, thousands of these Afghans quickly came into the United States, were forced onto our military bases.
And we saw that the Biden regime was listing a lot of these assaults that were taking place, sexual assaults that were taking place.
In fact, one involved a U.S. female service member.
She was apparently assaulted by a group of Afghan men.
And the FBI, sadly to this day, you know, I'll detail the very latest on it later on the show because I've been thinking to this for years now.
But sadly, we have no idea what happened to those men who was accused of assaulting her.
We don't know if they were released into the country.
The story itself quickly was swept under a rug.
There's no indictments that I could see of and the FBI still to this day not telling me anything.
But this is a common theme here.
There is a problem with Afghan men and how they both treat women and children.
And, you know, you recently posted a clip of you coming on our show.
This was a couple of months ago, where you detailed this for us.
But for our audience who missed it, I want you to kind of walk our audience members through what it was like for females that you served with in Afghanistan when they were just trying to carry out daily tasks and what it was like to work around Afghan men for them.
mark lucas
Afghan men had no respect for women.
And as a platoon leader, I could not communicate with local Afghan women.
So we would have females attached to us that were part of a female engagement team where they'd be able to talk to the Afghan women.
And it just so happened to be that all three of my women were blonde, so they stood out.
And we had to constantly protect them from Afghan locals and also from the Afghan national security forces that we were serving with.
So we had to constantly protect them and provide a security detail because these local Afghans would just hover around them.
And if we wouldn't have protected those women, they would have been beaten and they would have been raped.
So I'm trying to explain to the American people, these are politically incorrect things to say.
But if you ask me or any service member that served in Iraq and Afghanistan, we can tell you countless stories of why these Islamists are not compatible with Western civilization.
We should not be welcoming them into this country.
And some people were criticizing my post by saying, well, Mark, that's a very specific regional example of Afghanistan.
Well, when we look at the migration to Europe, why do these crimes follow these Afghans?
In the country of Sweden, you are more likely to be raped, 69 times more likely to be raped by an Afghan than a local Swede.
If you come here to the United States, if you look at Minneapolis, Minnesota, a Muslim abducted and raped a 12-year-old girl, and that local mosque actually wrote a letter of support of that horrible human being that conducted that rape, and he received the minimum sentence.
So I'm trying to explain to people that the Afghans that I saw overseas, they had no respect for women.
They'll beat and rape them.
And we're already starting to see that happen here on United States soil.
breanna morello
Yeah, yeah, we are.
And it's very hard for them in their own country to have any type of accountability when men, Afghan men or Muslim men as a whole, do commit violent sexual assaults.
They usually need, I believe it's two male witnesses to account for any sexual assault.
And so I don't think Americans really understand what we're dealing with here.
And I highly recommend for those who want to learn more to read the Quran in that sense, too.
If you just simply Google the violence that they are allowed to commit against women, especially non-believers, it is extremely alarming.
And so many people think it's a myth.
It's not a myth.
Look for yourself.
I literally bought the Quran myself.
I've marked every single portion that calls for violence against both non-believers and against those who are non-believers and women, how it allows them to have them as sex slaves.
And I don't think people really understand the issue that we're dealing with here.
Of course, not all Muslims are bad people, but the reality of it is we really have no idea of understanding who's been radicalized and who hasn't been.
And just based on their own writings, I am deeply, deeply concerned in all of this.
I wanted to shift gears a bit as well, Mark, because a lot's been happening about Venezuela.
We're hearing a lot of mixed reports.
And again, you know, I'll be making my way over to the Pentagon later today to try to learn some more information about this.
But we're hearing that there are 11 U.S. warships in the area, 15,000 troops in the Caribbean right now as the tensions continue to increase.
We're going to play clip 26 for you because President Trump was asked about this yesterday and he detailed what it was like for him to get on the phone with Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.
Take a listen.
donald j trump
Causing a lot of problems.
unidentified
Does your warning mean that an airstrike is imminent or should we not read it that way?
donald j trump
Don't read anything into it.
unidentified
The New York Times reported that you had a phone call with Maduro.
catherine herridge
Did you?
donald j trump
I don't want to comment on it.
The answer is yes.
catherine herridge
And can you tell us a little bit about that?
donald j trump
No, I can't do that.
unidentified
Mr. President, if you do something new, if you say it went well, I would say it went well or badly.
donald j trump
It was a phone call.
breanna morello
Okay, Mark, what's your take on all of this?
Because I don't seem to understand why.
I understand that Venezuela, obviously, is one of the massive drug trafficking hubs for us, and it's one that we should be pushing back on.
But it sounds like with the threats to close down their airspace and now this, that we're looking for regime change.
And that's something that a lot of Americans don't support.
But is there more here than the American people probably understand right now?
mark lucas
President Trump is fulfilling one of his campaign promises, and that's to protect the American people from these narco-terrorists.
We have had over 100,000 deaths last year due to fentanyl.
And Senator McCormick in Pennsylvania, he's talked about how we've lost more people from the drug trade than we had in Vietnam.
He mentioned that we lost 4,000 people from Pennsylvania alone.
And the American people are being terrorized by these narcos and by these cartels.
And we're losing hundreds of thousands of American citizens.
So if you look at the real threats to the American people is not in Ukraine and Russia.
The most imminent threat is this drug trade.
So I think it's very responsible for President Trump to have these negotiations with Maduro, to have these phone calls.
I know the deep state and a lot of these people from the failed foreign policy establishment, they love preemptive strikes with little to no dialogue.
But President Trump is having that dialogue.
He's being very specific about his intent.
And I do believe that we will be able to have a good resolution to this, whether it's regime change, regime collapse.
There's a lot of people talking about this.
I think what President Trump wants is a peaceful transfer of power to ensure that there's stability in that country.
But his responsibility, and Secretary Hegset, is to protect our American citizens from enemies, foreign and domestic.
And it's funny to see that these Democrats are having all these problems with President Trump trying to protect us from these narco-terrorists.
breanna morello
Yeah, yeah.
Well, that's the key point here, too.
I mean, it's infuriating that, you know, Democrats find themselves throwing themselves on the sword for narco-terrorists.
I mean, this is what President Trump does.
Their TDS is so bad right now where they are willing to sit there and defend narco-terrorists rather than ask themselves a tough question.
It's like, does President Trump have a point here?
Should we be fighting for the American people rather than these cartels?
Because that's exactly what they're doing right now.
And speaking of that, that actually is a great segue into this next clip, Clip 27, because Mark Kelly, Senator Mark Kelly, has been out there and obviously he's one of the seditious six, but he has been out there and he's been pushing very, very hard to go after Pete Hedseth, the Secretary of War, because he's not happy that Hedseth has called him out on his video telling service members not to follow orders.
Now he's telling them that they could, you know, just figure out whether it's a legal order or not on their own and then decide if they want to follow it or not, which is obviously not something that you want from your military service members.
But I want you to take a listen to this clip because Mark Kelly is now threatening Secretary of War, obviously, Pete Hedseth, for legal actions potentially that could take place in regards to these narco-terrorists.
Take a listen.
mark kelly
I have hearings.
We'll have public hearings.
We'll put people under oath.
We need to get to the bottom of this.
Hey, the U.S. military is the most powerful and effective military in the world.
And we've got to be precise and we have to be operating in accordance with U.S. law and international law, always.
dana bash
Based on what you, what CNN is reporting, what the Washington Post is reporting, do you believe if there was a second strike to eliminate any survivors, that that constitutes a war crime?
mark kelly
It seems to.
If that is true, if what has been reported is accurate, I've got serious concerns about anybody in that chain of command stepping over a line that they should never step over.
We are not Russia.
We're not Iraq.
We hold ourselves to a very high standard of professionalism.
And this is where I'm really troubled about this is because I have so much respect for people in the United States Navy.
I served in the Navy for 25 years.
And there is no organization more professional than Navy SEALs.
And they should be revered.
And that's why I say I hope what I've heard about this strike is not accurate.
dana bash
You mentioned that you were a captain in the Navy.
If you received that order, would you have carried it out?
mark kelly
No.
No, and I'm a guy who I have sunk two ships.
You know, I've sunk an OSA II missile patrol boat in Kuwait Harbor, a Palmakne troop carrier in the Persian Gulf during the First Gulf War.
I never, in that situation, questioned whether those strikes were legal.
We were given an order to do this.
It was a time of war.
These were Iraqi ships with Iraqi crew members who posed a threat.
breanna morello
Mark, what do you make of this?
Because again, he's really failing to outline what he deems as illegal orders that the president is forcing these service members to carry out.
mark lucas
Well, Mark Kelly needs to lawyer up and he better hire a very smart attorney who tells him to get off the Sunday morning talk shows because he is just digging himself deeper and deeper into this hole.
When you look at Venezuela, I think you need to look at it through the lens of that seditious six video.
They were telling people not to disobey or not to obey illegal orders and they said it repetitively and it was crafted by former CIA agents who understand how to develop propaganda videos.
And it was all leading up to Venezuela.
They want to undermine President Trump and Secretary Hegseth's ability to protect the United States of America.
And I'd ask Mark Kelly, how does he feel about Barack Obama's drone strikes?
An extrajudicial drone strike that President Obama conducted killed two American citizens, which included a 16-year-old boy.
I'll also challenge congressional Republicans who are looking at Venezuela and have question marks around these strikes.
Where were you when President Obama conducted an unprecedented level of drone strikes?
This is all politics.
It has nothing to do with national security.
All they're trying to do is obstruct and delay President Trump's ability to protect the American people.
And Mark Kelly, you better lawyer up.
I support President Trump and Secretary Hegseth's investigation into him.
I believe that he should be recalled to active duty and put under court martial and investigated for what he has done.
breanna morello
Yeah.
Well, what he's done, several other, obviously members, law enforcement lawmakers, what they've done over these last few days is absolutely egregious and really could be considered treason.
I know many of us, our audience, do believe that's the case here.
Mark, thank you for all the incredible work you continue to do.
We appreciate you joining us today, this morning, of course, but there's a lot going on all across the country.
So it was good to have you on to help us understand.
So thank you.
mark lucas
Thank you.
breanna morello
Folks, we're keeping our eye on a bunch of things going all, well, happening all across the country.
So thank you for joining us.
Again, give Mark a follow on X at MarkLucasUSA.
Give him a follow.
He's a great follow, of course.
And, you know, we want to kind of switch gears up a little bit.
I actually just got an alert.
Someone just sent it to me.
The White House has started up a new webpage, and it's quite the interesting one.
The White House debuted a new section on Friday on their website.
Now, I missed this.
I just got this now.
This section is called Media Offender of the Week, which will highlight one of the many fake news journalists and how they are misleading, biased, and they're looking to be exposed on this page.
The site claimed that the media misrepresents President Trump's call for members of Congress to be held accountable for inciting sedition by saying that he called for their execution.
And then they go off to highlight and to call out one of the many, obviously, outlets that have done just that.
Now, this is great because under the first term, I don't think the comms team over at the White House did a very good job at pushing back on all fronts related to that.
So this is refreshing, of course, to see play out.
And so I thought that would give you a good little laughter.
So every week, these White House so-called journalists, well, they're going to get called out on the White House website.
I'm sure that's not going to be welcomed for them.
All right, guys.
We've got a lot going on over here.
Like I told you, I've been investigating the Afghan so-called refugees who were shoved into our country by the Biden regime.
And we don't know who these people are.
Over the last few years, they've committed a lot of crimes.
And I've been saving an archive following all of it.
And I'm going to break it all down for you, including one Afghan refugee who was extremely ungrateful and actually went after and was ripping a police officer and then tried shooting the officer.
Now, obviously, that didn't go over well for the Afghan refugee, and he was shot and killed by law enforcement.
But I've got the soundbite that you probably didn't hear in regards to how this man blames us, Americans, for why he can't support his family now.
And then he said he probably should have fought for the Taliban when he was in Afghanistan.
Yeah, that happened last year, of course.
Plus, there's so many other cases we're going to get you caught up on regards to sexual assaults that took place on the military bases all across the country, even outside of the military bases, with one happening in Montana in a motel by one Afghan refugee who claimed that this woman wanted him and he allegedly sexually assaulted his victim.
I've been reaching out, trying to get some information on all of this.
I'll break down the very latest.
In the meantime, though, head on over to theauxjonestore.com.
That is how you keep us up and running and support our work as an independent platform over at theauxjonstore.com.
So much for you to buy, especially because it's Cyber Monday, 60% off site-wide.
Head on over to theauxjonstore.com right now.
Welcome back to the American Journal.
We are in Washington, D.C. today.
Lock on over here.
And so that's why, well, you can find me here.
I'm at the Rumble studio, and we're very thankful for Rumble allowing us access and to utilize their studio to bring you today's broadcast because there's a lot going on in Washington, D.C.
And we've got our eyes all over the place right now.
In just a few moments, I'm going to be breaking down my latest report regards to how I believe our federal government is trying their very best to suppress information to you, the American people, in regards to the violence committed by Afghan so-called refugees.
When we brought them onto our military bases, and not we asny and I, we're talking about the Biden regime.
When they brought them onto the military bases, there was an immediate surge in violent sexual assault cases.
And then quietly, you didn't hear about it ever again.
Doesn't mean it stopped.
Doesn't mean it stopped at all.
I've been digging into all of that.
Plus, they also caused $260 million in damages while we brought those people onto our military bases to seek emergency shelter so that they weren't slaughtered by the Taliban.
So, as a thank you, of course, they cost you, the taxpayers, $260 million for just that, you know, a little damages, broken furniture and just destroying the place, clogging up the plumbing, and so much more.
So, a lot going on over there that we're going to dig into in just a few moments.
Plus, over the weekends, I mean, I have been trying my very best to get answers in regards to a U.S. service member who was assaulted by a group of Afghan men, according to reports.
Back in 2021, I've been on this case since the very beginning, and I've repeatedly reached out for comment, tried to understand where the investigation currently stands.
So, I wanted to make sure those men weren't released into our country.
Well, unfortunately, folks, the current FBI doesn't want to answer any questions in regards to the investigation that they led.
They don't have any details for us.
Now, I've got all the emails.
We're going to call it out because enough is enough.
You know, they claim to be transparent and they want to be transparent with the American people.
And these were the people that were the most vocal under Christopher Ray and going after him all the time.
Well, we're going to call garbage on this one because, folks, we have asked these questions.
I have given them ample opportunity to discuss all of this with us, to give us the information.
We don't even want the victims' information.
I specifically am asking for suspects.
Were they charged?
Were they deported?
Were they released into our country?
And for some reason, the FBI, under this new leadership, is still refusing to answer those questions.
I've got tons of documents declaring just that, that they do not want to answer these questions, that they're in fact dodging all of this.
And there's no reason for it.
There's no reason at all.
Where are these men that assaulted a U.S. service member, a female U.S. service member?
Are they now your neighbors?
Well, you the people have every right to understand where these people were placed.
And the fact that they don't want to tell us tells you everything you need to know about this so-called transparent new administration.
I'll bring you the details on that in just a bit.
Plus, obviously, there's a lot more going on all around the country that we look forward to digging into as well.
Got an update on the seditious six, as well as the CDC finally admitting that children were killed by the COVID jabs.
Obviously, that's an alarming report.
I'll bring you the latest on that.
And Trump is also weighing in on the Ukrainian corruption issues.
You may have seen it over the weekend.
Zelensky's top official, the chief of staff, was also someone who was just swept into the corruption allegations.
And for some reason, Zelensky himself is just trying to dodge accountability.
Folks, that's your money.
What the heck do they do with it?
Also, we're going to play a clip, and I think it's a great clip, of Don Jr., obviously President Trump's son, weighing in on the censorship nonsense.
Jillian Michaels is someone who is all of a sudden now being thrown into the political spear because she is obviously a former Democrat who's claiming now to be a Republican, but she doesn't seem to understand the censorship issue and why we shouldn't allow censorship.
In fact, she just hates Nick Fuentes so much that she can't understand why anyone would want him to have his own platform.
Don Jr. actually weighing in on that, and it was quite the enlightening exchange.
I'll play that clip for you.
Also, Elon Musk answering the questions in regards to Doge.
So we got that clip for you as well coming up in just a little bit.
We've got about two more hours to unpack on the American Journal.
I've got so many more stories that I want to make sure you guys know about.
So do not go anywhere more to discuss.
In the meantime, though, make sure to head on over to alexjonesapp.com.
Down the app if you haven't done so already.
Folks, there's a reason why we're telling you to do that.
So do it right now, alexjonesapp.com.
We'll be right back.
Welcome back, the American Journal.
Happy Monday, everyone.
We're bouncing back from this holiday week.
unidentified
A lot going on all across the country, of course, news-wise.
breanna morello
So in case you decide to hit snooze on the news cycle, we're catching you up on all things related to that.
So thank you for being here.
And of course, you probably like, Rand, where are you?
You're not in your usual set.
No, we're not.
We're in Washington, D.C. today over at the Rumble studio.
We're very thankful for Rumble allowing us to carry out this broadcast here on their set.
Now, a little programming note, tomorrow, I won't be hosting American Journal.
It will actually be Harrison Smith.
We'll kind of be like a throwback for him, of course, but I will be over on the war room hosting from Washington, D.C.
I will be joined by several incredible congressional members and a senator.
And we look forward to having them in the studio for a great sit-down and a very important discussion.
So we look forward to doing just that tomorrow.
I'll be hosting again, War Room 4 p.m. Eastern Time.
Don't miss it.
We're kicking off the show with a lot going on.
So you're going to want to be there.
Also on Thursday, I will be airing all of the really important interviews that I'm doing over at the Pentagon.
Some of you guys know as an independent journalist, I've been now credentialed to cover the Pentagon, which obviously has the corporate media unhinged.
But we're excited about that.
I will be there both tomorrow and Wednesday, sitting down with some people you may be familiar with and maybe some faces you don't really know too well, but you're going to learn a lot about them when we have that discussion tomorrow.
So we look forward to just that.
All right.
So I've been digging into a lot and I wanted to bring you the very latest in regards to all of this because so many people miss things.
Stories happen in the news cycle and then they just move on.
Because the news cycle is very chaotic.
But I have a habit of just not letting up on things.
When there's a story that I think is very important for the American people to understand through and through, I keep my eye on just that.
In 2021, there was several stories about how we shuffled thousands of Afghan so-called refugees onto our U.S. military bases thanks to the Biden regime.
And then we saw instantly a surge in sexual assault cases.
Now, we saw at least six cases of violence and sexual assaults.
And for some reason, they magically stopped.
Now, it's not that they just all of a sudden stopped having these issues.
It's very apparent that the Biden regime didn't want it coming out that a lot of these individuals that they shuffled in were violent.
And so they stopped reporting on it to the media.
But there were so many cases.
And we've got this up for your screen.
I've been stashing away articles when all of this started going down.
Federal officials say Afghan refugee accused of raping.
This was a woman in this article, I should say, was properly vetted.
That was one, of course.
There was two Afghans, of course, who one of them was accused of sexually assaulting a child.
Another one was accused of spousal abuse.
Now, again, we don't know where that case is either these days.
I'll explain why this is a big issue.
Another Afghan refugee accused of assaulting a three-year-old girl.
And then another group of Afghan men were accused of assaulting a female soldier over at Fort Bliss.
Now, let me explain to you why this is very important.
Let's focus on that last story that you see on your screen, that female service member who was assaulted by a gang of Afghan men.
Now, the details were very, very limited.
We don't know if this was just an assault or if this was a sexual assault.
But given the history of these men, I could promise you it was very likely a sexual assault.
They behave like animals.
We know this.
You just heard Mark Lucas detail what they did to his female colleagues in Afghanistan, what they were trying to do, at least I should say.
And if you ever read the Quran, you know that they allow their men to capture sex slaves who are non-believers.
It is in the Quran.
They're allowed to commit violent acts against non-believers.
So I've been following that story for years now, and I want to know exactly where those men were.
I want to make sure that they weren't our neighbors.
They weren't just shuffled into the country after these allegations made their way to the surface.
And under the Biden regime, I was surprised to find out that they weren't going to tell me anything about it.
I've sent over several Freedom of Information Act requests, and they say nothing.
I've even reached out for comment on several occasions.
The FBI initially under the Biden regime telling me to fill out a FOIA request.
I want to know the status of their investigation, which is unheard of.
Normally, you ask the press team, the media relations team, and they tell you what the status is.
But they wanted me to fill out the FOIA, so I did.
And then surprise, the FBI telling me that they can't give me any information due to privacy reasons.
I wasn't asking for information regarding the victim.
I never would ask that.
That is obviously something that you'll never receive.
I know this, obviously.
I've covered several sexual assault cases.
It's the reason why I got into news in the first place or to cover these egregious crimes, make sure that the American people knew exactly what was happening.
And for some reason, even though I'm specifically asking for the suspects, they won't tell me.
But now we have a new administration, right?
So you keep hearing that we have new leadership over at the FBI and they're looking to transform the FBI.
They tell you this, but they don't actually show you any receipts in regards to that.
So over the weekend, I reached out yet again, and I reached out twice under this new FBI leadership for more information on this case.
The first time they ignored me.
Second time, the media team responded to me in an email.
And in that email, They refuse any type of transparency, saying we do not have any update or comment to share with you regarding that first case, that first case being the U.S. service member in the email I sent them.
Now, obviously, I followed up with that email and called them out.
You've had more than four years to investigate this, and you've got nothing to show the American people.
Also, calling them out in their nonsense when they refer to themselves as trying to be transparent in that email that we have.
My response to the FBI also included and called them out for when they decided to remember that Thomas Crookes report I did, along with Miranda Devine and Tucker Carlson, how they referred to it as false media reporting, but they themselves intentionally left out important screenshots that proved that their statement was actually false too.
See, this is the thing, right?
They like to play these word games with you.
When you give them the opportunity to create an avenue of transparency to comment on a story, they decide not to.
And you would think, one would think that this new FBI leadership would jump on this.
Why wouldn't you?
I'm not trying to bash the current administration.
I'm simply asking what happened to these so-called Afghan refugees.
They should know this.
They should know this.
And again, it wouldn't even be a reflection on the current administration unless you are trying to protect the institution.
And folks, I've got some very bad news for you.
It appears that they are trying their very best to continue to protect the FBI.
Remember the guys who were telling you we're going to get rid of the Hoover building, turn it to a museum?
Well, it looks like the people who are leading their media relations team are all on board with what the last administration was doing.
We do not have any update or comment to share.
Four years later, they still can't tell me what the hell happened to those men.
Are they now your neighbors?
Were they released into our country?
You have every right to know.
Were charges ever brought up?
I mean, I continue to try to key search it, but folks, if you don't have names, it's very, very hard to look up court filings.
And they won't give me names.
They won't give me any names.
The FBI led this investigation.
They are refusing to give us any information about a U.S. service member who was assaulted, likely a sexual assault, on a military base here in this country after we imported men from Afghanistan.
And this is me ripping the FBI again for not doing their damn jobs.
Folks, we are friends with a lot of these people who have made their way to the FBI.
There is no reason for these types of responses unless you are still trying to cover up for the old FBI.
It's very clear.
Just put your PR hats on.
It's very clear that my question isn't angled at beating up on the men who are currently leading this new FBI.
My issue here is what happened to these men who were accused of assaulting a U.S. female service member.
I don't know what else to say.
This would have been a huge PR win for them if they would have just told us.
Is there an investigation?
Was there no proof of any assault at all?
And that's the reason why they don't have anything to tell me.
You could say something to sit here and to say, we're not going to give you a comment.
I'm not going to tell you where the investigation stands.
You, the American people, you, the taxpayer, is garbage.
It's absolute garbage.
These men were brought into our country unvetted and they went around sexually assaulting women and children.
And it wasn't just them.
And again, I'm not even arguing for letting the vetted ones.
I'm done with all of it.
No one, no one, because our own federal government admits that even when, and we play that soundbite for you with Tom Holman, the borders are saying it, even when we vet these individuals, we can't really vet them.
The Taliban's not going to tell us that they're a part of their own organization, their own terror organization.
What the heck do you think vetting does?
And then the suspect here in DC, the one who shot those two guardsmen.
Well, apparently, according to the information that was shuffled over and they granted him asylum, there were no signs that he was a terrorist.
And the fact that they're saying that he was radicalized here on U.S. soil.
So what the heck can we do?
That means that the whole vetting process itself is garbage.
So what do you do?
Well, first off, if I were to present to you four apples and I told you one of those apples is poisonous.
The other three are completely fine for you to eat.
Would you gamble and eat one of those apples to see which one's poisonous?
Any intelligent person would say no.
They'd pass.
And it's exactly what we need to do in this country.
In fact, why don't they turn to the Arab world?
Why aren't they taking these people in?
There's a reason for that.
unidentified
There's a reason for that.
breanna morello
There was an individual, first name Jamal Wally's last name.
He is an Afghan national.
Now, we're going to play this clip for you.
I don't have the clip number, but we're going to play this clip for you.
And in it, this was from last year.
In this video that you're about to listen to, he was involved in a police-involved shooting.
This happened in Virginia.
Now, he actually did shoot at police and he did injure one of them.
But keep in mind, folks, this is an Afghan refugee that we shuffled into this country because apparently, according to the Operation Allies welcome program that was led by the Biden regime, he helped our service members oversee.
But he doesn't seem so grateful or thankful when you actually speak to him.
Listen to his interaction with law enforcement.
I must warn you, it does end this video in a fatal police shooting.
Take a listen.
unidentified
Look, look, hey, I'm I died when I was serving you liars with you people with American status.
mark kelly
I served as well, sir.
unidentified
Yeah.
So you brought me to this.
You people brought me to this country and I'm dying every single day.
And I have four children and we wholly survive because you're a fish people.
Okay.
Yeah, because I can't get a job.
I can't get a disability.
And they took my face because I'm not able to pay the insurance.
So why are you trying to kill me?
I'm not turning.
No, you are.
I'm already dying.
I don't give a damn.
mark kelly
Don't reach for anything.
unidentified
I'm telling you, don't reach.
I'm telling you, don't reach.
I don't give a damn f if you do anything.
Don't do anything.
Subject keeps reaching for his weapon.
No, I'm not, I'm, I'm not reaching.
Sir, just all you have to feel, talk over your restricted 1439.
Sir, I stopped you for a lawful traffic.
Oh!
I don't give a damn f you liar.
I'm not lying.
mark kelly
No, you're obviously right there.
unidentified
You are not to this.
So what I'm asking for is white people.
You lied for 25 years.
You brought me to this country.
I served with special forces.
I lost my whole brother.
I lost my everything.
donald trump-jr
I'm sorry.
unidentified
I have nothing.
I'm sorry to hear that.
No, you swear.
Take it.
I take this with you, okay?
No, no, no, no.
Hey, don't you reach it.
Hey, so listen, American.
This is take it.
I take this with you, okay?
So now you want to give me that.
Hey, don't you reach.
I take this with you, okay?
breanna morello
That Afghan man was killed by police.
But folks, if you notice, they allowed him way too much leverage.
Their empathy thankfully didn't become fatal for them at least.
But they gave him time and time again to relax to chill out.
And the video itself, it goes on for a couple of minutes, but they continue to say, don't reach for your firearm.
Don't reach for your firearm.
If that were an American, they would have dragged him out of his car instantly, instantly.
So we got to keep talking about why they continue to sit there.
And again, it is that fatal empathy that we have as Americans where we want to be sympathetic to people from all over the world because they want to believe that they are doing their best, that they want to actually contribute to society.
But the reality of it is you heard him complaining about how we haven't done enough for him.
We saved him from being killed by the Taliban.
Now, again, he ended up losing his life, obviously having a mental breakdown and all of that.
And I don't think he was an Islamic terrorist, but I do think he was an ungrateful Afghan who we brought into this country.
And yes, it's going to be hard.
Of course, it's going to be hard.
But we don't owe you anything yet.
We spared you and your children and your wife their lives because they would have likely been slaughtered by the Taliban.
Later also in that video, he also says that he wished he was actually fighting for the Taliban.
And it's not just that.
There were others, obviously, who were shuffled into this country who hate our guts, as you heard that individual outline for you.
And thanks to the Biden regime, they were shuffled in and we allowed it to happen.
Countless sexual assaults, terrorist attacks planned out.
Even this one, I want to take a look at this.
This was back in 2024.
Maybe you remember it.
There were two individuals, two Afghan nationals who received legal status under the Biden regime who pled, one of them did plead guilty to plotting a terrorist attack in Oakland City on election day in 2024.
Now, that individual obviously was sentenced to 180 months in prison.
Czar is his last name.
Or Zayd, it probably is.
Might be a typo.
But that individual sentenced to 180 months.
The other one is facing potentially 35 years in prison.
Again, two individuals not very grateful for being brought to the United States.
In fact, looking to kill us and carry out a terror attack on Election Day, on Election Day.
And it goes on and on and on.
And, you know, thankfully, DHS even added a thread, but even that in itself, one was sentenced 15 years.
Yes.
So even DHS is outlining the crimes now committed by these Afghans that were shuffled into this country and the crimes obviously being very egregious.
But it's not surprising.
Again, the vetting process is absolute garbage.
There's no such thing.
There was even an Afghan, and this one, I cover this on my ex page over the weekend, who was accused of raping a woman in Montana.
Now, I read through the allegations he was facing.
He apparently told police that she was into him and was aggressively throwing herself at him, but she claims it was rape.
She was a teenage girl.
He, I believe, was either 18 or 19 at the time, staying in a motel, but he was shuffled into our country by the Biden regime.
Now, I keep looking up the ongoing cases because keep in mind, this is 2021.
So, these people should all have their day in court.
This guy, the one I just cited for you in Montana, I have not seen any court filings.
Montana is very, very difficult, the state itself, to find out updates on their court filings due to privacy issues.
So, it's very, very hard to see where that sits.
But there have been several other cases, even one in Fort McCoy, where one Afghan refugee was accused of attempting to rape a child.
Again, I looked up the status of that investigation, even reached out to the DOJ to find out more.
I don't have anything for you besides being indicted, that is all we have.
All we have.
And I just, for our control room, I actually just sent you guys in the link in the docs.
I just sent you guys a link of the DHS thread itself where they just go through all these cases.
And it's not even all of them.
There are several other that they're still missing out on.
But let me remind you, folks, that they are not, this is it.
Thank you guys.
They are not telling us the truth on all of this.
A lot of these cases have gone MIA.
We have no idea what's going on with them.
And I'm wondering, what the heck are we doing here?
Was the Biden administration intentionally trying its best to not tell us what was actually happening?
These are, you're seeing these cases that are scrolling on your screen right now, if you're watching, from news articles.
But where's the actual government updates?
unidentified
The government would know.
breanna morello
Again, I've reached out to the DOJ, I've reached out to the prosecutor's office in Montana, and I don't have any updates for you.
All I can tell you is that these people have been charged with crimes, and we know nothing about how those crimes have been resolved.
It's been four plus years.
Four plus years.
unidentified
You got to have something for us.
breanna morello
Unfortunately, no one wants to be transparent anymore.
We were promised transparency.
That's not what we're receiving.
So at the end of the day, this is kind of like what I want to hover over: the simple fact that we continue to hear from this administration.
We want transparency.
We're going to be transparent.
We're going to earn back the trust of the American people.
And yet, there is a fog over a lot of these three letter agencies because they refuse to do what they told us.
In fact, when I reach out for comments, many of them ignore, or they just try to really dodge it all together.
But the reality is, we're not fringe.
We're not some conspiracy theories when we're simply asking you questions about what the heck happened in these cases.
And although I do see, and we'll talk about it later in the show, I do see that unfortunately, the FDI deputy director has been on X quite often now, and he continues to go after those who are criticizing both him and Pattell.
I just want to be as transparent as possible.
Maybe he doesn't realize it, but we continue to reach out for comments to allow you the avenue to defend yourselves, to be transparent with the American people.
And unfortunately, they just don't do that.
they just don't do that actually i just got some kind of breaking news about that story i just told you about that rape the alleged rape in montana I'll be getting those documents soon, but the Montana District Attorney's Office actually just responded to me.
And I will bring you the latest once I get those documents back saying that the case against that suspect, Muhammad, is his last name, was closed on August 17th of 2022.
The last document was filed on 2023.
So I will be bringing that to you once we get that, of course.
But the DA's office getting back to me, which I'm thankful for.
And if we get that during the show, I will show you those documents and we'll go through that together.
But there's a lot going on that we're going to continue to dive into on today's show.
We haven't even touched the surface on all the news stories I want to make sure we catch you up on.
We will, and this is the sexual assault case I'm talking about here.
Again, he was accused of rape.
The victim saying that this was unwanted.
In his counter argument, he said that this was wanted.
And the court just saying to me, the DA's office saying that the case has been closed, and they are going to hopefully send me over those documents in just a few moments so we can see how that case concluded.
Folks, in the meantime, I want to remind you all that we're doing our Cyber Monday sale over right now at the AlexJonesStore.com.
Head on over to the shop and make sure you stock up on all your favorite items because it is 60% off the entire website.
So head on over to the alexjonestore.com right now.
This is only going to last for a couple more hours.
So you got to go over there now.
And when we run out, we're really going to run out.
And as many of you guys know, we do run out on all of your favorite items quite often.
Beth Wayne, Redback, and Stock, and so much more.
So head on over to the shop and make sure you grab yourself some right now, the AlexJonesStore.com.
We're discussing this at the moment.
james comey
I'm grateful that the court ended the case against me, which was a prosecution based on malevolence and incompetence.
ted cruz
This investigation of the president was corrupt.
The FBI and the Department of Justice were politicized and weaponized.
And in my opinion, there are only two possibilities that you were deliberately corrupt or woefully incompetent.
And I don't believe you were incompetent.
james comey
This case mattered to me personally, obviously, but it matters most because a message has to be sent that the president of the United States cannot use the Department of Justice to target his political enemies.
I don't care what your politics are.
You have to see that as fundamentally un-American and a threat to the rule of law that keeps all of us free.
ted cruz
Did any FBI agents or confidential informants actively participate in the events of January 6th, yes or no?
January 6th, yes or no?
catherine herridge
Sir, I can't answer that.
james comey
I know that Donald Trump will probably come after me again, and my attitude is going to be the same.
I'm innocent.
I am not afraid.
And I believe in an independent federal judiciary.
karoline leavitt
Well, what I will say is that everybody knows that James Comey lied to Congress.
ted cruz
On May 3rd, 2017, in this committee, Chairman Grassley asked you point blank, quote, have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?
You responded under oath, quote, never.
He then asked you, quote, have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton administration?
You responded again under oath, no.
Now, as you know, Mr. McCabe, who works for you, has publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that you were directly aware of it and that you directly authorized it.
Now, what Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to this committee cannot both be true.
One or the other is false.
Who's telling the truth?
james comey
I can only speak to my testimony.
I stand by the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017.
ted cruz
So your testimony is you've never authorized anyone to leak.
And Mr. McCabe, if he says contrary, is not telling the truth.
Is that correct?
james comey
Again, I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine is the same today.
karoline leavitt
It's as clear as day.
And this judge took an unprecedented action to throw these cases out to shield James Comey and Letitia James from accountability based on a technical ruling.
And the administration disagrees with that technical ruling.
We believe the attorney in this case, Lindsay Halligan, is not only extremely qualified for this position, but she was, in fact, legally appointed.
And I know the Department of Justice will be appealing this in very short order.
So maybe James Comey should pump the brakes on his victory lap.
alex jones
Well, the Dredge Report, the Democrat Party mouthpiece, has the headline, Bondi blows it.
Comey and James, cases dismissed.
By another one of these globalist judges, the same ones that have said everything Trump's been doing is illegal, like arresting illegal aliens, and of course, higher courts then override it.
But it's a lot harder when a criminal case gets dismissed by a judge.
catherine herridge
Did the FBI do these investigations by the book?
unidentified
No.
catherine herridge
No question.
unidentified
No question.
catherine herridge
These FBI records about the burn bags came to light during the criminal prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey.
These burn bags contained records from Mar-a-Lago, January 6th, and the FBI Russia probe.
unidentified
Someone has access to those different cases, a very limited source.
catherine herridge
So limited source or a very senior person.
unidentified
Right.
catherine herridge
Is the fact that there was an investigator-level briefing for journalists at the New York Times?
ted cruz
That is highly, if it's not illegal.
unidentified
I don't know what it is.
mike davis
Lindsay showed the receipts that Kash Patel and Dan Bongino found, including in the burn bags inside of a skiff inside the FBI.
They were trying to destroy this evidence, and Cash and Dan found it, turned it over to Lindsay, and Lindsay filed her response to Comey's motion to dismiss for malicious prosecution.
catherine herridge
The CIA warns the FBI, and then at the same time, they're applying to the National Security Court using information, which is opposition research.
unidentified
You can wound somebody's life by just open investigation on them.
alex jones
The globalists have most of the courts.
They have the big corporations.
They have a lot of the brainwashed young people.
They have the universities.
They don't have the mind of the average person anymore.
But to them, they all feel insulated.
They can just, as a mob, move against us in different ways and that they're going to be victorious in the end.
I can assure you that it's not going to go the way you think.
breanna morello
Welcome back to the American Journal.
We're excited to see you for all joining us.
A lot going on over here.
We're excited to have you on with us today.
As you can tell, we're not in our normal setup.
We are in Washington, D.C., and we are thankfully over at the Rumble Studio bringing you this broadcast because there's a lot happening in Washington, D.C. As many of you guys know, I am now credentialed as an independent journalist to be covering the Pentagon, and that is why we are here.
It is Media Week for the Pentagon, new media.
And I look forward to heading on over there and conducting some very exclusive interviews with some top Pentagon officials.
Look forward to that.
Of course, we will also be hitting the streets.
And we're going to try to figure out what's been going on in D.C. over these last few months so far.
So we're in swamp territory, so we're going to take full, full advantage of just that.
But there's a lot of stories that we wanted to make sure we covered that you may have not seen over the holiday week.
President Trump has been, since that horrific terror attack that was carried out by an Afghan refugee, has been really clamping down on immigration.
We're going to play clip seven for you because President Trump says he's just done with these migrants who've come into our country from third world countries, and they are in fact permanently stopping them from continuously flooding in.
Take a listen.
donald j trump
I think a long time.
breanna morello
Can you give any kind of a certain point?
donald j trump
We don't want those people.
We have enough problems.
We don't want those people.
jillian michaels
Is that a year, two years?
donald j trump
No time limit.
But it could be a long time.
unidentified
You said that.
donald j trump
We don't want those people.
Do you understand that?
unidentified
I understand.
donald j trump
Do you understand it?
jillian michaels
I understand.
donald j trump
Who are you with?
jillian michaels
I'm with News Nation.
unidentified
Okay, by Nation News Nation, great, great.
donald j trump
Let me just tell you something.
We don't want those people.
Does that make sense?
You know why we don't want them?
Because many have been no good and they shouldn't be in our country.
unidentified
What do you mean by those people?
Can you clearly?
donald j trump
People from different countries that are not friendly to us and countries that are out of control themselves.
Countries like Somalia that have virtually no government, no military, no police.
All they do is go around killing each other.
Then they come into our country and tell us how to run our country.
We don't want them.
unidentified
How many countries, roughly, would you put on that list?
jillian michaels
She's like, how many?
unidentified
How many countries?
Yeah.
donald j trump
Well, I guess we gave you 19, right?
It is probably more than that.
james comey
Is that what you mean when you mean third world countries, those 19?
donald j trump
No, and then I don't think they're all third world, but in many cases, they are third world.
They are not good countries.
They are very crime-ridden countries.
They're countries that don't do a good job.
They're countries that don't register from the standpoint of success.
And we, frankly, don't need their people coming into our country telling us what to do.
james comey
When you talk about denatural.
donald j trump
We're talking about like Somalia, where you have a congresswoman who goes around telling everybody about our constitution, and yet she supposedly came into our country by marrying her brother.
breanna morello
Oh, they hate it when you talk about, oh, they hate it when you talk about Ilhan Omar like that.
But the reality of it is Somalians, and we're going to go into great depth about it in a little bit into the show, but Somalians, they don't contribute much.
And by much, that's me being nice.
They don't contribute anything.
I asked you guys all yesterday on X, what has Somalian refugees contributed to the United States?
And the answer is not a single, single person was able to pull up a single contribution thanks to Somalians.
The reality of it is they are the ones who are committing fraud.
That's something that most people don't want you to talk about, but we have the evidence that proves just that's been going on for years now.
Everyone's just afraid of calling it out.
They are obviously, I guess, contributing to lowering our IQ statistics.
In case you haven't heard, the average Somalian is around a 68-point IQ level.
Not exactly very, very high.
And when you compare that to other countries, it is very, very clear that they are the bottom of the barrel when it comes to IQ.
And yet, we continue to funnel them into this country.
And it's not even like they're thankful for having the opportunity to be around people who are highly intelligent, people that are able to build things and possibly take those things back to Somalia and try to find themselves a way to build up their country.
No, no, no.
They're leeching.
They're leeching through fraud.
They're leeching through corruption.
unidentified
And they hate us.
breanna morello
And they let us know that all the time.
They continuously come to our country, fly their flags.
Obviously, if you live in Minnesota, you know what I'm talking about here.
And not many people want to call it out.
Not many people want to call it out.
But thankfully, President Trump is doing just that.
When we talk about not bringing in people from third world countries anymore, it's important to note people like this.
I believe, actually, I believe he's American born, but his family were brought here.
You couldn't really tell based on the pirate appearance.
But these people, and I'll say it because I don't care what the mainstream media says, define these people.
Well, these people, these Somalian people, these people who come from low IQ countries were allowed to almost exclusively fly into our country over for four years now.
And we, not we, the Biden regime allowed it.
In fact, they encouraged it.
They flew them in.
They flew them in.
Not because they could actually contribute actual skills to our society, but because they would be leeches to our system.
They would strongly rely on welfare because they have no educational background.
Most can't even read.
Most don't even care to learn English.
And so Democrats know those are people who are going to vote for them, if ever given the opportunity to vote.
Because, well, the reality is, is those people rely on the government because they are not capable of being able to survive on their own.
And that's why Democrats funneled them in.
It's one of the many reasons, many reasons.
So, President Trump now doing just that, putting that ban.
They're like, how many?
A couple of years, couple of months, maybe forever, maybe forever.
You shouldn't be ashamed to say it.
If you love this country, you should be able to go out there and say that we, in fact, want the best, the brightest to join us.
If they're not the best or the brightest, they can't find any type of refuge here in the United States.
And it's okay to say that.
It is okay to say that.
Only treasonous pigs would allow those who cannot contribute to our society, and in fact, would leech and suck this country dry of all of our great financial resources, would encourage those to come in who don't actually have anything to contribute.
Now, Mark Kelly, the senator from Arizona, he's not very happy with the administration.
And obviously, he's had a very rough couple of days, potentially facing criminal charges himself.
But in clip eight, he's going after the administration for not wanting brown people here.
Take a listen.
mark kelly
When I heard the secretary say that they're going to pause immigration from third world countries, I mean, I take that as a message that they don't want brown people coming to the United States.
And I find that disturbing.
We are a country that has always welcome individuals that are struggling, that are fleeing famine and violence.
And it would be a fundamental change to the fabric of our nation to change that.
breanna morello
Oh, wouldn't that be a shame?
Wouldn't that be a shame?
I don't think it would be.
Mark Kelly, obviously, doing his very best to drum up the racist narrative, but the reality of it is, we know the facts.
We know the facts.
You're not a racist for wanting your country to succeed.
At this point in the game, just I'm done with asylum.
I actually used to be very liberal on this issue.
Yes, we are a country built off of immigrants, but those were the kind of immigrants that wanted to contribute to our society, the kind of immigrants that actually wanted to help make the United States a better country, America a better country.
And sadly, those aren't the people who are bringing it in.
Time and time again, we see it.
Those who are going through our process hate our guts.
They hate our guts.
So why would a country ever continue this?
And we continue to talk about denaturalizing these people, but no one's actually pulling the trigger on that.
Why?
Well, because everyone's afraid of being called a really mean name.
No, if they don't love and appreciate this country, get them out of here.
Get them out of here.
And it's never ending.
It's never ending.
In fact, outlets like CNN, they're drumming up the narrative too.
Clip 10, we're going to play for you.
CNN is detailing how one illegal was tossed out by the federal government just recently.
And it's kind of, it's kind of interesting to see because when you deport one illegal, apparently four more head out at them.
So it's actually a bargain these days.
Take a listen.
unidentified
Goesantos has lived in the United States for three years.
She's been raising her children on her own since January after her husband was deported.
She tells me she wanted to stay in the country longer and have better education for her kids.
Goasantos says ICE agents contacted her over the phone and gave her an option to either be detained or self-deport.
She believes leaving is the best choice for her family.
She says, I don't want my kids to see someone come into the house with a gun or have them or her be handcuffed.
Goasantos plans to make the most of her last few days she has here.
She still says she has plenty to be grateful for.
She's thankful to God, for her kids, and family.
I asked her what she'll miss most about being here in the U.S. Las person, the people, she tells me.
She's grateful for the kind people she's met and the calmness that Tucson's brought her.
breanna morello
Well, we're sorry to see you go.
Just kidding.
We're not.
If you come into our country illegally, you do not have a right to be here.
We owe you nothing and you should be forced to leave.
Here's the reality.
How long has she been here for?
She hasn't learned English.
Again, it's just another sign that these people do not want to contribute to our society.
You could sit here and come with a bunch of excuses as to why they're allowed to not learn English.
But the reality of it is when my family came here, they learned English pretty quickly.
They tried their very best to become contributors to society and not leeches.
And that's the key point to all of this, folks.
We have people who have now come into this country off of the promises of free, free, free, and they're looking to cash out at your expense, of course.
So although it might seem cruel to wish all of them to be deported, the reality of it is they are stealing resources from Americans.
We should not be paying for this.
We are a nation in debt.
We are a nation that is continuously becoming worse and worse in debt.
And for some reason, we continue to allow all of this.
So self-deport, head-on out of here.
We highly recommend you do just that.
And in fact, the Trump administration has thrown in financial incentives for you to get the heck out of here, too.
Paying you money, paying for your flights.
Adios.
Let's continue the discussion, though, of course.
You may have seen it.
Now, I'm no fan of the R word.
I know, I know.
I'm not someone who personally uses it.
I know I have a lot of friends who do not agree with it being used.
My mom becomes infuriated if she hears the R word.
But I wanted to play clip nine for you because President Trump did refer to Tim Waltz as retarded.
And obviously, that has the media very upset.
So here's how President Trump responded.
Take a listen.
unidentified
Tim Waltz, and you call him a part.
Many Americans do find in a fixed form that are not retarded.
Do you stand by that claim of calling Tim Waltz retarding?
donald j trump
I think there's something wrong with him.
Absolutely.
You know what?
I think there's something wrong with him.
Anybody that would do what he did, anybody that would allow those people into the state and pay billions of dollars out to Somalia.
We give billions of dollars to Somalia.
It's not even a country because it doesn't function like a country.
It's got a name, but it doesn't function like a country.
Yeah, there's something wrong with Waltz.
breanna morello
Well, there is something wrong with Waltz.
The American people know that.
That's the reason why they rejected him.
As I've joked time and time again, Tampon Tim is someone who the rest of us have just been left scratching our head.
He's very feminine, obviously.
And that's putting it nicely.
As the president said, he didn't believe that men should have tampons in the men's bathroom until he saw Tim Waltz.
It's very apparent that that's what he's using these days.
I'll leave the rest of that a mystery to you.
But, you know, the reality of it is, Tim Waltz has allowed these Somalian migrants, as kids call it, full access to our federal resources and has allowed them to leech the system.
And we've seen time and time again, all of these crimes be committed, some being indicted, some not though.
And we continue to see reports that they're actually sending us back to terrorist organizations in Somalia, which is great, right?
As if we weren't funneling enough money from our own federal government to the Taliban.
Now we're supporting Somalian terrorists.
Now, President Trump time and time again continues to rip Somalia, and he did so again in clip 11.
Take a listen.
donald j trump
People from different countries that are not friendly to us and countries that are out of control themselves.
Countries like Somalia that have virtually no government, no military, no police, all they do is go around killing each other.
Then they come into our country and tell us how to run our country.
We don't want them.
james comey
We're talking about them.
donald j trump
We got to talk up.
jillian michaels
She's in how many countries?
unidentified
Is there a list?
donald j trump
Well, I guess we gave you 19, right?
That is probably more than that.
james comey
Is that what you mean when you mean third world countries?
Those 19.
donald j trump
No, I don't think they're all third world, but in many cases, they are third world.
They are not good countries.
They are very crime-rich countries.
They're countries that don't do a good job.
They're countries that don't register from the standpoint of success.
And we, frankly, don't need their people coming into our country telling us what to do.
And if I would talk about like Somalia, where you have a congressman who goes around telling everybody about our constitution, and yet she supposedly came into our country by marrying her brother.
Well, if that's true, she shouldn't be a congressman and we should throw her the hell out of our country.
breanna morello
Yeah, yeah, it's the truth and the reality is these people don't want to hear it.
I would also back President Trump's argument in regards to why are we letting them dictate what we do in this country?
They have no qualifications.
They have no experience building a successful government.
In fact, their country for centuries has been unable to pull together anything.
They are not intelligent people.
It is something that obviously nobody really wants to say out loud because they're afraid of what the backlash that might create.
But the reality of it is Somalians, like so many other third world countries, are unable to create a government that is functioning.
They are unable to.
So then we allow them into our country.
We allow them to run for government.
And what do they bring to the table?
Well, obviously nothing.
No intellectual conversations, no ideas of substance on how we can make this country a better place for all.
No, they're here because they hate us.
They're here because they hate our success.
They hate the fact that the United States of America is an incredible, incredible country.
And so people like Ilhan Omar and others, when you continue to see them come into the United States, they have nothing but hate and fury that they continue to advocate for.
They do not advocate for a better United States.
We are the best country in the world.
Nobody could argue that.
Well, they'll try to, but you're not winning me over.
The United States of America is the best country in the world.
And anyone who wants to sit there and pretend like it's not are probably terrorists.
They hate us for our success.
And they are coming to our country to destroy us.
There is no other way to look at this.
They come from hellholes, dumpsters, whatever you want to call it.
And then they pretend like they somehow, some way should have some type of voice in our country.
Why don't you just sit back and enjoy what our ancestors have worked so hard to protect and to bring forward?
We've allowed you the gift of coming to this country.
You can't contribute because you're incapable of it.
Then sit back.
But the reality is, is no, that's not why they're here.
You hear Ilhan Omar continuously pledge her alliance to Somalia.
And this is what we have to deal with.
Now, when it comes to the fraud, Governor Tim Walz is someone who continues to go out there and try to dodge the question because obviously a bunch of this has happened under his leadership.
And in Clip 13, you're going to hear how he did his very best yesterday to dodge the specifics about Somalians committing fraud here in the United States.
Take a listen.
kristen welker
Dozens of people of East African descent have been charged, convicted, and sentenced for stealing more than a billion dollars in taxpayer money from government programs during COVID.
As you know, Governor, that is more than Minnesota spends each year to run its Department of Corrections.
So I want to give you a chance to respond to this.
Do you take responsibility for failing to stop this fraud in your state?
tim walz
Well, certainly I take responsibility for putting people in jail.
Governors don't get to just talk theoretically.
We have to solve problems.
And I will note, it's not just Somalis.
Minnesota is a generous state.
Minnesota's a prosperous days, a well-run state where AAA bond rated, but that attracts criminals.
Those people are going to jail.
We're doing everything we can, but to demonize an entire community on the actions of a few, it's lazy.
breanna morello
Ah, don't you dare demonize, dare demonize those coming from Somalia to take your money and funnel it over and funnel it over to their terrorist buddies.
It's absolutely egregious.
Noteworthy, it's note, it's noteworthy.
I can't even speak today.
That's no different from any other day, folks.
But it is worth noting that over the weekend, the Minnesota Department of Human Services put out a very interesting tweet.
Take a look at this.
They actually call out Tim Waltz for being at fault for the massive fraud that's taken place over these last few years.
100% is what they're saying is the fault of Waltz.
They continue to go on and detail exactly how it is his fault and how it's been a catastrophic failure on his part and how he continues to allow these leeches to commit fraudulent acts and take your money and shuffle it over to people that hate us, other people that hate us in Somalia.
So good on them for calling him out.
And it's worth noting too that this tweet, thankfully, has got a lot of attention.
If you look at this, even the New York Times having to confront this and put it out in their outlet, but 34 million people view this one.
Isn't that great?
More on the way.
Don't go anywhere.
We got a lot more to take into just swamp territory bringing you today's show because a lot's happening over here.
And so we figured, why not get some boots on the ground in the swamp?
We are also thankful for Rumble allowing us to broadcast from their studio space, of course.
I will be here today, obviously, for today's show, as well as our show tomorrow.
Now, I will not be hosting the American Journal.
Harrison, thankfully, is filling in for me because there's a couple of things heading over at the Pentagon that I'll be at.
So we look forward to that.
But I will be hosting War Room.
And we've got quite the list of members of Congress, senators joining us.
So it's going to be a great show tomorrow.
So you're going to want to tune in at 4 p.m. Eastern time is when we kick things off.
And we're starting up the very top of the show, which is shuffling in all of these incredible, incredible people.
I don't speak highly of lawmakers, politicians, don't like a lot of them, but these are the people who I do truly like and I do believe are authentically in this fight.
And so we are very thankful for them.
Joining me tomorrow, there's a lot of things going on in the world.
We're keeping you in the loop in regards to what's happening on the latest in that investigation into that Afghan terrorist that shot and killed two, or one was dead.
I should correct that.
One is dead.
The other one is still fighting for his life, of course.
His family is expecting him to survive.
Those two guardsmen, that terror attack, obviously is taking place here in D.C., happening sadly, just hours after they were sworn in.
So this is a story that we're continuing to follow.
Now, as I told you previously in the show, I've been following several cases regarding a lot of these violent Afghans that are brought into our country.
They were shuffled into our country.
And sadly, as we continue to cover it, we're learning more and more.
And I mean that in like a lighter tone, because the government still to this day is not feeding us any information.
Now, according to FBI whistleblower Kyle Serafin, let me just cite this, because Viva Frey actually just called me just a few moments ago.
We broke down that report for you regarding the U.S. service member who allegedly was assaulted by a group of Afghan men.
Now, the FBI, both under the Biden regime and under President Trump, Kash Patel's leadership, obviously, are refusing to give any details as to what happened there.
Well, according to FBI Wessell Kyle Serafin, it appears that that woman may have actually not told the truth.
And again, these are allegations.
This is not something that I can confirm.
But Kyle Serifin trying to shine a light as to why we're not hearing anything as to why were there any men arrested for this.
It appears, according to his perspective on this issue and his view, that this woman may have lied about this assault.
And that is the reason why no criminal charges have been filed.
But again, if you're the FBI, why wouldn't you just say that?
Why wouldn't you just say that?
Why wouldn't you prosecute her?
Listen, if any woman comes forward and makes false accusations about a man or a group of men, I want to charge them.
I want to hold them accountable because you do not get to go out there and to make false accusations.
So I'll be reaching out to the FBI again to get their take on it.
But of course, the current FBI, not very enthusiastic about answering any questions.
That's a very simple one.
If she lied, then tell us she lied.
Are you covering for her?
Our money, our taxpayer money was used to investigate the claims that were made.
So if this is true, which again, we don't know if it's true or not, then what the heck are you doing here?
Shouldn't she be charged?
Well, I'll continue to ask the FBI those questions because I'm probably one of maybe a couple of people they just never want to hear from these days.
We're actually going to play a couple of soundbites from the FBI director Kash Patel because, you know, he's not very happy with the coverage he's been receiving in the media.
I mean, we don't promise fluffy coverage.
We promise to bring people the truth.
And wherever the truth falls, that's what we're going to tell the American people.
We're not in this to BS anyone, but we're going to listen to that too.
We're also going to see the latest comments that have come out from Dan Bongino, obviously the deputy director of the FBI.
He's been coming out and talking a lot about all of this.
So I look forward to bringing you just that in just a little bit too, because Bongino is someone as well who has been very upset with people, very upset.
As many of you guys know, I would have considered him to be a friend.
I don't want to be, I don't want to be mean or overly aggressive, obviously, because it's a very tough job.
But the reality of it is I do believe there are people intentionally trying to sabotage him.
And I think we need to be clear and direct about that.
So I'll bring you the latest on that and the comments he's made and my reaction to that.
So there's so much more underway.
In the meantime, though, head on over to the alexjonesstore.com.
It's our Cyber Monday sale.
If you're wondering what Cyber Monday sale means, well, that means a lot of savings.
It's 60% off the entire website right now, which has got a couple more hours left in this.
So head on over to the AlexJonesStore.com and stock up.
unidentified
It's now time to stock up on all of your favorite Christmas signups over thealxjonesstore.com.
breanna morello
We're on the way.
Welcome back to the American Journal.
We are in Swamp Territory today on this beautiful Monday morning, covering everything going on here in Washington, D.C. at the Rumble studio right now.
And we're thankful for Rumble allowing us access into their space.
Of course, a lot happening all around the country that we wanted to make sure you were caught up on.
As many of you guys know, it's a holiday weekend.
So I'm sure a lot of you probably were occupied with other things to do.
But I've been buckling down and digging into the very latest.
And we look forward to bringing you just that.
There's a lot developing all around the country.
President Trump just posting something on Truth Social.
I just want to bring your attention to.
He's praising the former.
I don't really want to use that word, but they're claiming he's former al-Qaeda fighter.
He's also known as the Syrian leader right now on Truth Social posting about lifting sanctions and terminating those for Syria.
And I believe this was truly appreciated by Syria, its leadership and its people.
probably should have a talk with the Christians who were slaughtered due to this new leadership in Syria.
But again, this is what the president is going off on, saying that the new president of Syria is working diligently to make sure good things happen for both Syria and Israel.
Again, I just, I'm not going to, I'm not going to pretend like this is acceptable.
I'm not going to pretend like this is acceptable.
So we could just move on.
I just don't even know what to say anymore, folks.
We have, you know, we have a president who gets it, and then he does things like this.
Obviously, this guy is a CIA appointee.
He is not elected by the Syrians.
Remember when Joe Biden was trying to push him and he said, oh, they're going to have elections now in Syria.
And then the Syrian president saying, we don't have time for elections.
I am your leader now.
We actually had a bounty on his head, a couple million dollars, but it was $10 million, but we still let him come into the Oval Office.
So that's what's going on right now in this current administration.
Again, we're going to cover the good, the bad, and the ugly.
So we are continuing to dig into all of this, of course.
So we'll keep our eye on that.
But I also wanted to highlight a couple of other issues as well.
I'm following that story of that individual, one of the Afghan men who was accused of sexual assault.
That case, according to the local Montana prosecutors, was closed down nearly a year later.
The office telling me that they are going to work aggressively hard to forward me the documents relating to his court case.
And I'll bring you the update on that because again, I'm trying to figure out what's going on with all these Afghan men that were accused of sexual assaults.
Where do those cases lie?
FBI whistleblower.
Kyle Seraphin actually putting some light onto that story that I've been detailing for you throughout today's show and on X. For years now, I've been trying to figure out what happened to that U.S. service member, that female U.S. service member, who claimed that she was assaulted on that Fort Bliss military base.
Well, according to Viva Frey, just called me just a couple of minutes ago, and he said, hey, I had Kyle Serafin on my show, and I'll have to listen in on to that later after we finish this.
But Kyle Serafin saying that they believe that that woman actually was not telling the truth.
And if that's the case, then why is the FBI under this current leadership not telling us?
Again, I spent all weekend trying to get the FBI to tell me something about this woman and they won't tell anything.
They won't tell us anything.
So no surprise there.
It could have been an easy win for them if they would have just said, it's not an investigation anymore.
The woman lied.
I would have followed up and asked.
There were criminal charges filed against her, but it doesn't appear to be that.
Doesn't appear to be that.
All right, folks, let's turn to the seditious group of lawmakers who decided to put out a video just a couple of days ago telling our service members that if you are told to do something that you deem is illegal, an order that's given down, you actually don't have to carry it through.
Take a listen to Clip 14 and how Senator Mark Kelly continues to defend his stance on all of this.
It doesn't make any sense, but he's still pushing for it.
Take a listen.
kristen welker
Asked you about the substance of this video and your message in it.
What specific orders do you believe President Trump made that you consider unlawful?
mark kelly
So this is looking forward, but let me give you, let me give you a pass, an outline of things that he has said.
In 2016, he said that the U.S. military will follow his illegal orders.
He was given, he said something on a debate stage and was reminded that would be illegal.
And he said the military will not refuse his orders, regardless of whether they're legal or not.
He also talked about shooting protesters in the legs.
How un-American, how unconstitutional is that?
Fortunately, there was a Secretary of Defense that has stopped this.
He's also talked about sending troops into U.S. cities to use those cities and people for training.
I mean, this is we're concerned because of this president, with this Secretary of Defense, that we could have a significant problem.
So this was a simple message, follow the law, and it was looking forward.
breanna morello
Well, and now, obviously, Mark Kelly, unable to tell you specifically what things he deems as illegal.
He's dancing around everything, not being direct because he's full of it.
He's full of it.
Mark Kelly is in some very serious, you know what, and he just continues to dance around the issue.
And it's non-stop.
It's non-stop.
Mark Kelly is probably going to be facing some type of penalties, we hope, for his behavior.
But again, this is all politically motivated.
It's not really a surprise, though.
It's not really a surprise.
You and I both know that these people just hate President Trump and they're looking to continue to go after him at any cost.
All right, folks, let's switch gears a little bit.
Let's focus on the FBI a bit because I just like, I can't get over how bad things have gone.
As many of you guys know, I've endorsed both of the leaders over at the FBI.
I was very enthusiastic about their arrival and it hasn't been working out.
You know, the FBI director, Kash Patel, his communications team, the ones that handle communicating with the media, they have not been helpful at all.
They have not been helpful at all.
And there's one individual who I say, yeah, that one person has been helpful, but the rest of them as a whole, I have to think it's obviously intentional at this point, that they want to create a rift between the director, the deputy director, and the media.
Because when we reach out for comment, we clarify a report before we release it, and they refuse to respond.
What does that tell you?
What does that tell you?
And it's obvious to me that they don't understand what their job is.
Again, I'm going to bring up that report about that U.S. service member, the female U.S. service member who was allegedly assaulted by a group of Afghan men on the military base in Fort Bliss.
For years that I've been reaching out about this, they dance around the issue.
And then again, you know, we hear, we hear that they're just not really doing much on this.
Apparently, according to Kyle Serafin, that, oh, yeah, this was a woman who apparently lied.
Again, I don't know.
The FBI not answering any questions.
But why am I talking about this?
Well, I'm talking about this because every time I reach out to the media relations team for the FBI, they continue to dance around it.
At first, they tell you to go reach out to this department, reach out to this department, and they can't quite give you an actual avenue for communication.
They can't.
At first, it was reach out to the Pentagon just a couple of days ago.
Then it was, okay, reach out to the DOJ.
Oh, no, we have no comment.
We have no comment.
But then before that, it was fill out a FOIA request.
And then the FOIA request was rejected.
If this is a woman who lied, there should be criminal charges filed against her.
You don't get to lie about being assaulted and file a false police report or file a report with the FBI and then not be held accountable.
If she was not someone who is being truthful, charges need to be filed.
So you don't get to do that to people.
But the FBI is continuing to cover up for the last administration.
And so it's not really surprising.
It's not really surprising.
And if you play nice, though, if you play nice with this current FBI, they actually will reward you.
Now, I don't know what those rewards look like, of course.
But they will reward you by providing with a ton of exclusives.
You and I both know who they are.
There are several reporters out there who consistently get exclusives.
And it's because they don't ask questions.
They just regurgitate what comes to their inbox.
And that's not me.
That's not Miranda Devine.
That's not Tucker Carlson.
That's not any of us.
We ask questions that might make leadership feel a little uncomfortable.
But they're questions that if you are truly fighting for transparency, you wouldn't mind answering.
You wouldn't mind answering.
Well, the director did sit down with Epoch Times, it looks like.
And in regards to several topics we're going to highlight, I want to play the first one for you.
Patel has revealed that the case, remember the case they filed against James Comey, the former FBI director.
Remember how it was dismissed?
Well, he says it's not over yet.
He says it's not over yet.
Take a listen to clip 15 and the latest update that the FBI director has for the American people in regards to Comey's ongoing investigation.
kash patel
Because it's pending in terms of appellate status and what we are going to do for the next steps.
The judicial process can make whatever determination it wants, but we, the FBI, and our partners at the DOJ have numerous options to proceed, and we're executing on all those options.
So we're not done.
jan jekielek
Any detail?
kash patel
I would say stay tuned for right after Thanksgiving and you'll see multiple responses, in my opinion.
jan jekielek
So you've initiated some cultural changes at the FBI.
That's something that many people have talked about.
Some people like it.
Some people don't.
What would you say is the most?
breanna morello
All right.
So post Thanksgiving, TikTok.
I don't know, honestly, at this point.
I hate the stay-tuned thing.
I guess if we're watching like a drama unravel, I'm so over it.
Just tell us what's going on.
Just tell us what's going on.
I don't want this lingering question, right?
Because then it captures headlines and they all love it.
I don't want this anymore.
I'm tired of this.
The American people are tired of it.
Will you guys do your jobs?
Will you go after James Comey?
Because listen, even if you don't want to go after him anymore for the lying to Congress, there are so many other avenues you could take up with this man.
So many other avenues.
And so if we're going to require the bare minimum, then yeah, you'd probably go with lying to Congress.
That's the bare minimum.
Is there a RICO case going on?
Maybe he's round up in that too.
unidentified
Who knows?
breanna morello
Stay tuned.
I mean, come on, folks.
Patel, you're not hosting a show on Infowars.
We're not asking you to do a deep tease for the next episode, for your next episode.
We're literally asking you for the facts that the American people know what's going on.
The stay-tuned thing is just so overly dramatic, and that is intentional.
That is intentional.
And it's really, really frustrating to see, because I was one of the fools.
And listen, I'll admit when I'm wrong.
Although I'm a biological woman, we are very rarely, really wrong, or at least admit to it.
What I sat here and said, it's cash or nothing in regards to him getting confirmed.
I'm a fool.
Because it doesn't matter who's running the FBI because they're not really running the FBI.
That's what it seems like.
You can put your little tinfoil hat on.
That is what the rest of us have to kind of just go by these days.
Why are we sitting here and waiting as this is like a novella on the next episode of Kash Patel leading the FBI?
We'll tell you who's indicted next.
I mean, I don't, what are we doing here, folks?
This is such a waste of your time.
It truly, truly is.
And this is what they do.
This is what they do.
But if you want to get onto like the novella side of this, let's talk about Kash Patel and his girlfriend.
Ah, there you go.
That's what I feel like we're doing these days.
I'd probably get a better prediction if I put an aluminum hat on.
I was actually meaning to bring, remember we had that special where we had the aluminum foil up on the alexonstore.com so you guys could build your own foil hat.
I meant to bring it with me and to run around the Pentagon and ask others to join me.
I forgot that though.
Forgot that.
But I wanted to talk a little bit about Kash Patel's girlfriend because, again, I mean, the FBI director was someone who was heavily critical under the last administration when they were using the jet to just go on to personal matters.
He was very, very critical of that.
We have, there you go, that's the epic one.
We have several times now covered it.
But the reality of it is, but he had no problem whatsoever coming out here and going after Chris Ray and others for using the jet as a personal little plane for themselves at our expense, of course.
Well, obviously now, Kash Patel is doing that as well.
And a lot of people are fired up and angry about it.
So they've criticized him for it.
And rightfully so.
He was critical when it happened under the last administration.
So if we're playing by the same set of rules, which I always encourage, the American people could voice their concerns.
The media can.
It doesn't mean that they're liars.
Yes, are they liars?
Yeah, they are.
But guess what?
Not when they're criticizing you for your use of the American taxpayer-funded jet.
And I've just had enough of it.
I've had enough of it.
In fact, these guys are consistently going out there and they're using that as the excuse.
They continue to say time and time again: fake media reports, journalists.
No, You don't get to sit here and dismiss people who are going off the facts or criticizing you.
unidentified
You don't get to do that.
breanna morello
So obviously, Patel has been criticized for his girlfriend using the FBI's her own private security group.
Feet on the furniture.
All right, I had a joke.
I'll keep it to myself though, because I can only say so many racist things at once.
Kash Patel justifying using the jet or using security, I should say, the SWAT team to secure his girlfriend.
Obviously, something that if it was your wife, I'd say, okay, that's fair.
That's fair.
But it's his girlfriend.
And they've been dating for many years now, but she's still just your girlfriend.
Listen carefully in Clip 16 on how Patel continues to describe his girlfriend.
And for all of you heterosexual men out there, answer this question for me.
How many of you would refer to your girlfriends, your wives, as this?
Take a listen.
jan jekielek
I want to give you the opportunity to set the record straight on a couple of things that have been in the media a lot.
And one of them is: you know, the allegation is there was too much of an effort in terms of the security detail, like an over-protection of your partner, Alexis Wilkins.
How do you think about this, this reporting and these allegations?
kash patel
Well, first of all, thank you for letting me address that.
I think it's disgusting that an agency head has to even address the fact that their partner's life is continuously being threatened.
We treat my partner like any agency head treats their partner with the authorities that are in place already following all the rules and regulations.
And when any individual, across any agency head and their respective spouse or partner, has a threat to their life, we come in hard.
And unfortunately, there are multiple threats against Alexis's life that have caused us to properly secure her safety.
And that is done independently by career FBI agents.
I don't have any part in that.
They make those decisions.
They are the ones doing the security backgrounds and security analysis.
And the people on social media using it to generate clicks and trash are jeopardizing the safety of her and other great Americans.
And we are going to protect them every step of the way.
We are not doing anything any agency has not done before us.
breanna morello
Did you hear that?
Okay, it continues to call.
And this is going to be the female in me because I'm so tired of the refusal.
And again, it's quite strange if you, and I've had, I have Indian friends, obviously.
It's quite strange that he's in a relationship, a long-term relationship with just the girlfriend, that they're not yet engaged.
I also think it's quite strange that he refers to her continuously as his like life partner.
Heterosexual men, I've never heard them refer to someone who they're not married to as their life partner, my partner.
That's usually something that gay men refer to when they're living with someone who is not their spouse, who's not a female.
We constantly hear that.
Now, again, it's not me trying to say or insinuate that he is gay because that would obviously be an opinion rather than a fact.
But the reality of it is, is why does he continue to do this?
It's just bizarre behavior.
It's bizarre behavior.
If she's your girlfriend, you truly do love her, marry her.
Marry her.
Now, again, that could be my own personal.
Maybe I'm a feminist.
I just didn't know it.
But I'm just like, I'm so over it.
I'm so over it.
He's way too old to be sitting here referring to a girl he's been dating for quite some time now as someone he loves and truly wants us to protect the American taxpayer protect and then yet he can't commit to her.
Strange, it's strange, so I'll just let that one float out there.
I think I've said enough.
I know that uh, these two love lawsuits, so we'll just uh, we'll leave out everything else and just overly tell y'all, that was my opinion.
Let's shift gears a little bit.
Dan Vondina has also been sounding off and I'm like Dan.
I mean gosh, this is so like.
This is hard to do.
I was so proud of Dan for taking on this job as deputy director, but again, there's a lot of reports that are coming out and um, I mean, at least this one he addressed hand on.
I'll give him credit for this.
Take a look at this one.
This has to do with the Epstein stuff.
So there was these uh redacted emails that were posted online, I believe.
I believe it was Business, WAS the, was the outlook that put it up first.
I want to give credit.
Actually, let me click it, because I know that the reporter went after them for stealing it.
If I could find it real quick.
I want to give credit what credit's due, but there was a journalist who actually got a hold of all of this and uh, ultimately it's an email.
It's an internal email that says newly released emails obtained through a FOIA request and sadly, this this account should be citing who the journalist is, who received it reveal that Dan Bongino approached in March to help redact and censor the Epstein files.
Now, if you could see this email, this email was literally sent, I believe, like the day after, the day after Bongino was brought in as the deputy director.
So you got to be fair, he officially started his duty on March 17th.
The email and the chain you see forwarded to me.
My requests were sent before I even began my position.
So he and I know this because uh, he wanted involvement in a lot of the ongoing issues and he made everyone forward over.
So this original email comes to us from March 11th.
So Dan just kind of clarify and say, listen, he had no role in the censorship, the redaction, but he did ask for all of this stuff to be forwarded to him.
So that's why you see his name wrapped up in there.
So credit for him for giving you know some type of update on that.
I do truly believe that there are people trying to sabotage him.
But then Dan posted this earlier today.
A lot of people were very upset.
The changes and reforms we've made at the FBI now I'd say, what changes, what reforms?
That's still an ongoing question.
Every time I ask, I'm told it's a personnel related issue and they cannot tell me about this.
They will do anything to revert to the old ways of doing things.
So they leak gossipy nonsense to the media outlets and journalists in quotes with a clear agenda.
Now, judge the results.
I work for you, not the headlines.
I'm still waiting for the results, folks.
And I know you guys are too.
Yes, thank you guys.
This was the original reporter who got that FOIA.
I let the credit when credits do.
And this was the original one.
And I believe he worked for business, not mistaken.
I just recently actually started following him based on this because I think it's great.
Anyone who's able to go out there and get these FOIA requests fulfilled, I'm a big fan of, as many of you guys know.
Oh, and let me give you a little teaser.
As many of you guys know, as an independent journalist, I tend to sue.
And yes, he's an investigative reporter for business.
Thank you guys.
I like his nickname, the FOIA terrorist.
I think I'm going to have to take on that one as well.
As many of you guys know, I have several lawsuits pending against the federal government for their failure to be transparent under the Biden regime.
Those lawsuits were filed.
And TSA has finally admitted, eh, all right, we effed up.
And so we are going back and forth to conclude my TSA lawsuit.
It will be wrapped up shortly, but they are now negotiating on how we could settle this case.
And the very latest, the last bit of information I have for you is that they are going over the dollar amounts and how they could help pay my legal fees now for that lawsuit.
Now, again, when I file a lawsuit against the government, I recoup zero dollars personally.
It's just a matter of getting the documents that I request through FOIA when they don't hand those over and making sure they pay my attorneys so I don't have to.
So we look forward to officially concluding that lawsuit against TSA, but that was in regards to the illegal aliens.
They were putting on flights and weren't requiring them to have any IDs like the rest of us have to.
All right, folks, there's more underway.
Don't go anywhere.
Headed over, though, in the meantime, for Cyber Monday sale over at thealxjonestore.com.
A lot happening there, 60% off site wide over at thealxjonestore.com.
Don't miss out.
Third hour, last lap.
Got a lot going on over here.
Stories we still haven't been able to dive into yet because there's so much going on in the world.
So thank you for joining today, folks.
As you can tell, we are live in Washington, D.C. today over at the Rumble Studio.
A lot going on over here.
We're thankful you're joining us.
It's been a crazy one.
As many of you guys know, I've been credentialed full-time to cover the Pentagon as an independent journalist, and we are looking forward to doing just that.
So I'll be shuffling my way over to the Pentagon in just a bit.
I've got a lot of questions I want to ask, and I look forward to doing just that.
As many of you guys know, too, we're going to have our show tomorrow.
It's not going to be, I'm not going to be hosting the American Journal.
Harrison's nice enough to fill in for me so I could go over to the Pentagon and ask a lot of the questions over at their presser.
I'm sure we'll be broadcasting that live to you as well during the American Journal.
But I will be in the room.
I've got a lot of questions to ask the press secretary, Kinsley Wilson, who was so gracious enough to welcome us in and give us this access.
So I'm thankful for her.
We're also going to be asking the tough questions.
And I think a lot of people are going to want to listen in to see what's going on specifically.
And that's one of the things I have to say about the Pentagon.
Let me just tell you this.
I have done some stories that have been great stories, obviously, for them, good stories that highlight the good that they're doing.
But I've also highlighted some stories that are very critical of the current Pentagon.
And they still gave me credentials.
They still welcome me.
They still respond to my request for comments.
This is the big difference between the Pentagon and other agencies currently.
So again, you don't have to give cushy coverage to the Pentagon.
They'll still welcome you in.
And that is the big difference, the big, big difference.
We look forward to being there.
I also was just looking at the list.
There are some incredible people who I'll be joining, of course.
And I look forward to doing just that.
So we'll keep you in the loop on that.
But I will be hosting War Room tomorrow, 4 p.m. Eastern time.
I have a credible lineup of guests that are going to be joining me.
Let me just pull up the list of who we have so far lined up.
We have tomorrow, obviously, Congressman Troy Nels, who has just announced that he will not be running for re-election.
He is going to be leaving Congress.
So I've got a lot of questions to ask him.
I'll also be joined by Senator Toby Tuberville, who is also leaving the Senate.
And he's going to be, he is currently running for governor right now in Alabama.
We'll also have Andy Ogles on the show as well.
I've got a lot to ask him because, as many of you guys know, he's been very outspoken about the Islam issue here in the U.S.
And so we look forward to that.
I'll also be joined by Nick Sorter.
You guys know he hosts a show here on Infowars.
He will be joining me in the studio tomorrow to kind of go over a lot that's going on in Washington, D.C. and throughout the country.
And so I look forward to having him on the show in person.
There will be more guests also added to the lineup tomorrow.
So you're going to want to tune in to the war room tomorrow with me as your host live in Washington, D.C. All right.
A lot going on.
Oh, by the way, we just got another press release pushed out from Attorney General Ken Paxton.
He is actually investigating right now.
Let's see.
Let me pull that up.
He is actually investigating right now, Sheen.
Now, they are the company that manufactures clothes and accessories for women and men.
They are a relatively inexpensive manufacturer.
There's been several allegations of slave labor over in China.
And although those claims have not been proven and the company does deny it, it looks like Ken Paxton is stepping in and he has now launched an investigation into Sheen and its affiliate, which is this Sheen USA service, as well as its affiliate Sheen, the global fashion giant, as they say, is going over and they're trying to see whether there's unethical labor violations and practices.
So again, I mean, this is Ken Paxton, one of the only people out there who continues to go after companies that are obviously being accused of corruption and slave labor.
And so here he is going after Sheen and trying to get some answers here as they continue to be accused of things like that.
So we'll keep following that story as it develops, of course.
We got our eyes on that.
But let's bring things back into what we had planned for you today.
You may have not seen it, and I think this is a really interesting one that we have to bring to the surface.
The corporate media is finally reporting about the COVID jabs leading to fatalities, but specifically in children.
There was a new memo that was released in regards to the FDA and how they know.
Internal review found that there were at least 10 children who did die after receiving the vaccines.
The 3,000-word memo, according to NBC News, was written by the director of the FDA, Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Ultimately, it says there were fewer than 10, determined there were fewer than 10 of the 96 child deaths reported to the, this is VARES, between 2021 and 2024.
So they are at least confirming just that.
Now I have a feeling it's a lot higher than number.
And so although they are claiming to be transparent in this front, I would say it's probably not an accurate, an accurate description of how many children died from this vaccine.
Well, this jab, I wouldn't even call it a vaccine, did not provide immunity like they said it was going to.
And so interesting.
So finally, we're finally hearing the numbers.
They've been hiding this forever.
They've been hiding this for a long time now.
No surprise there, folks.
This has been one of the largest, largest criminal, I would say, enterprises in quite some time now.
The push to pretend like these jabs did anything, but destroy the immune systems of healthy people, create turbo cancer cases like you've never seen before, and also lead, sadly, so many Americans to die, to die.
And so the VARES report, I've always told you, is very inaccurate.
In fact, hospitals, doctors intentionally do not report all vaccine-related injuries because they fear retaliation.
We've spoken to doctors before about that.
I've had them on the show, and they tell you, yes, it's true.
They, in fact, do fear retaliation.
They won't fill out those VARES reports because if they fill out too many, they will get targeted.
And so just keep that in the back of your mind.
All right, when it comes to corruption, Ukraine is just full of corruption.
We've known about this for years, even before the war between Ukraine and Russia was kicking off.
Recently, though, Zelensky, Zelensky's chief of staff, he has just been wrapped up into this nether, I guess, just kind of accusation.
He's since resigned.
Interesting enough, this was another corruption raid.
And again, these people just continue to avoid accountability.
They took your money, they shuffled it in.
We have no idea what's going on with it because they didn't do any audits.
But corruption just continues to flood into Ukrainian politics because it's a country obviously at war and billions of dollars was being flooded in.
And so if they scraped off a couple of million off the top of that, no one would notice.
That's why our politicians flooded in.
Remember, all of our senators, our congressmen, we sand with Ukraine and they flooded into Ukraine on their planes and they had no problem going there for their photo op.
Strangely enough, though, there was no U.S. presence, no U.S. military there.
Why would you, as a lawmaker, go to Ukraine, knowing it's an active war zone, when you don't have our military backing you up?
One of the many questions we have to this day.
I want to play clip 17 for you, though, because President Trump is reacting to the latest corruption scandal in Ukraine.
Take a listen.
jillian michaels
Spoken with Rubio and Wakov since that day.
unidentified
Yeah, I've spoken to them and they're doing well.
donald j trump
Ukraine's got some difficult little problems.
They have some difficult problems.
But I think Russia would like to see it end.
And I think Ukraine, I know Ukraine would like to see it end.
jillian michaels
You just said that Ukraine has a little bit of problems.
donald j trump
A lot of the corruption situation going on, which is not helpful.
breanna morello
And it's not impeding the peace talks.
donald j trump
I said it was going on for three years, right?
Didn't I say it?
For three years, I said it.
So I was way ahead of schedule.
But I think that there's a good chance we could make a deal.
unidentified
Mr. President, I'm.
breanna morello
All right.
So when it comes to the peace deal, folks, we got our eyes on that because everyone wants war to end, except those corrupt politicians who've been scraping off money at your expense.
And I'm talking about those in both America who flew on those jets.
We talk about it all the time.
On those planes, they had no problem shuffling in there.
I used to say all the time, oh, we should weigh them, see if they come back heavier.
The reality of it is there was no reason for them to go there.
They did so for their photo op and probably to, in my opinion, to steal money from the American people.
That's why they were so quick to continuously funnel in our money into Ukraine.
They were all profiting.
They were all profiting.
And the corruption goes deep, but they won't continue to tell you that.
But we need this war to end.
And President Trump obviously cutting off the gravy train.
And in clip 18, the Secretary of State, Mark Rubio, gives us an update as to how peace talks are going right now.
Take a listen.
marco rubio
The end goal is obviously not just the end of the war.
Obviously, that's central and fundamental.
We want to see the end of the killing and the death and the suffering.
And I'm sure the Ukrainian side, I know they do as well.
They want peace.
But it's also about securing an end to the war that leaves Ukraine sovereign and independent and with an opportunity of real prosperity.
So this is not just about ending a war.
This is about ending a war in a way that creates a mechanism and a way forward that will allow them to be independent and sovereign, never have another war again, and create tremendous prosperity for its people.
Not just rebuild the country, but to enter an era of extraordinary economic progress.
It's a country with Ukraine has tremendous economic potential.
Ukraine has tremendous opportunity for true prosperity.
Obviously, you can't do that in the middle of a war like this, but ending the war alone won't achieve that.
So this is not just about peace deals.
It's about creating a pathway forward that leaves Ukraine sovereign, independent, and prosperous.
And so we expect to make even more progress today.
breanna morello
And that's good news for the American people who are done funneling their hard-earned cash into Ukraine and those who are actually looking to preserve lives because both Ukrainians and Russians have been slaughtered in this fight and it was completely avoidable.
And we could have saved them.
But unfortunately, due to the corruption, these people continued.
These politicians continued to egg this on even the globalists as well.
Let's not forget about them.
All right, I want to turn things over a little bit because Don Jr. actually, I think, did an incredible job at dodging an obviously angled topic, an angled question done by Jillian Michaels.
Now, Jillian Michaels, obviously, she's a health freak.
This is her beat these days.
But she since has transformed into someone who's giving her political takes non-stop.
Now, interesting enough, Jillian Michaels, someone who is now framing herself to be a Republican, I guess, these days, she doesn't like.
And I actually remember because I was on a podcast and everyone was telling me that she had actually walked off the set when it came to the Israel criticism that was happening at the table.
But she doesn't like people like Nick Fuentes.
And she actually wants to silence them.
Now, she'll tell you, oh, well, I don't want to like de-platfort them or de-platform them.
But she's always going around.
But the reality is she's looking to silence them.
That's in my opinion.
In Clip 19, you're going to hear how Don Jr. did his very, very best to dance around Jillian Michaels' call to cancel Fuentes and to try to silence his opinion.
Take a listen.
jillian michaels
Now you're starting to see some of the things in the alt-right fringe of the Nick Fuentes and the young Republican group chat that is racist and that is scary and sexist to an alarming degree with someone like Nick Fuentes.
And I'm wondering, you're seeing this kind of fracture to the left.
I'm seeing people who are more moderate become alarmed.
And people on the right are like, yeah, yeah, whatever, not a big deal.
I'm here to tell you it's a big deal.
And I think it's a big deal because all of those people that your dad invited in, Tulsi, Kennedy, myself, inadvertently, right?
All of these more, Rogan, all of these more moderate people who flee the crazy on the left are alarmed if the right doesn't disavow the Nick Fuentes.
And it doesn't mean, I'm not saying cancel Tucker Carlson.
That is not what I'm saying.
I wish Tucker had handled him differently.
I have no problem saying that.
But I do think it's going to be a problem.
And I'm wondering if you see it as a problem for the right in the midterms and in 2028.
Because I think if this continues without it being fully condemned aggressively, I think you get Gavin Newsom for president.
And I know what that looks like.
And it's scary stuff.
donald trump-jr
Elizabeth, I'm a little torn on the issue.
I think sometimes having been canceled and having, for even common sense things, I'm not about cancel culture, but I think sometimes, I don't know that you have to platform everyone, but let them sort of speak.
And I think some of those radicals, they sort of give themselves up in many cases in their own things.
And I'm good friends with Tucker.
I actually don't think he's really all that radical at all.
I think I do see a lot of stuff that sort of manufactured crises.
I see a lot of sort of the neocon handles trying to create these conflicts to break it up because they want to go back to the old ways, not the America First ways.
I do think that sort of social media and the way those things have been manipulated and some of these, you know, the stuff you're seeing even this week with, you know, well, oh, this account that's, you know, America First is, you know, driven out of, you know, some country in the middle of nowhere.
It's like they're actually trying to sow discord and create A fight that probably really doesn't exist with the vast majority of people.
I think, you know, again, I'm sort of a free speech absolutist, but that doesn't mean there's not consequences to that speech.
And if you hear some people speak and you don't like it, you're like, man, I sort of feel like they almost cancel themselves and not with censorship, but by people being like, okay, that's not even a reasonable decision.
We're just not going to listen to this person anymore.
And so I do think that's important because, again, I've seen what they try to do to so many people.
I was one of the early guys calling out a lot of the censorship on Twitter.
They're like, well, how do you know?
I was like, well, I know because yesterday I was getting 5,000 retweets a post.
Today I'm getting three.
Not 3,000, three.
Like single digits, three.
Like that's something happened, something changed.
And so, you know, I think we have to have conversations, even conversations we don't want to hear, or even conversations we think may be disgusting and listen.
And then people will make up their own minds and they'll sort of, you know, the way I look at it, you kind of vote with your wallet.
You walk away from that and you figure it out on your own.
jillian michaels
I'm just deeply concerned that if there's a guy who says women want to be ridiculous, he does not say, this is not who we are as a party.
This is not conservatism.
We find him repulsive.
donald trump-jr
It's, I'm telling you, it's yeah, but I also think sometimes even acknowledging what you do, every, if you're going to acknowledge every person that says something ridiculous, all of a sudden, you're just making them bigger in a way.
Sometimes you just got to let the idiocy just go out there in the ether and you can't respond to everything, right?
Because it just becomes like clickbait troll-worthy stuff.
And everyone starts doing it and everyone then starts taking their own bait.
And, you know, and that's sort of what I was alluding to earlier with like some of the stuff, you know, going on right now.
It's like everyone's just trying to like out-radicalize themselves for clicks and this.
And it's, you know, it's a bit nuts.
And I don't think we do that as well with the left.
The left sort of has their talking points and they generally speaking stick to them, even if I disagree with them vehemently.
You know, we're a little different in that we are a lot more open.
We do have a lot more different viewpoints.
breanna morello
All right, let me step in.
donald trump-jr
We don't just say, okay, well, the party is.
breanna morello
Don Jr. Really doing a great job there.
Don Jr. did a great job at answering that question.
Obviously, Michael's trying to corner him in and try to get an answer that she really wanted.
And the reality of it is it's not my job.
It's not Don Jr.'s job to control other people's speech.
Why would you sit here and say that we have to condemn what somebody else has said?
This is the interview I was actually talking about.
I was actually on the next episode and she walks out because she can't handle the conversation happening between Anna and the group.
This was her take.
This is the PBD podcast.
She walks off the set, which is fine, which is fine.
Listen, we could have disagreements, but there's no reason just to be this obnoxious.
Okay.
You could sit here, we could have conversations, but to sit here and say, well, if someone doesn't agree with me, then the rest of the world should condemn.
We all need, and it's not my responsibility to condemn what Nick Fuentes says.
Nick Fuentes has a massive platform.
And because of people like Jillian Michaels' continuous efforts to go after him and regulate his speech, they have made him a bigger celebrity.
Don Jr. just like saying that, detailing that, plugging that for you.
The reality of it is I don't have to agree with someone, but I'm not coming for them.
I'm not going to go after them.
That is foolish, foolish.
And it's only happened on the right.
We're only forced on the right to condemn someone else's speech.
It doesn't happen on the left.
The left doesn't go after their own and say, well, you're far left.
You're preaching communism.
We must condemn you.
We must go after you.
You are going out there and validating in your eyes Charlie Kirk's assassin.
They don't do that.
You know why?
They stick to their own.
So this challenge when Jillian Michaels tells Don Jr. that he must challenge her.
He must go out there or vice versa.
I mean, he must challenge Nick Fuentes and say, and condemn him.
It's not his job.
It's none of our jobs.
It's not our job to control speech and to condemn people.
And the fear-mongering tactic that she uses there by saying Gavin Newsome will be president then.
That's not the case.
That's not the case.
No one's going to turn and vote for Gavin Newsom because you didn't condemn Nick Fuentez.
I'm so done with these people who want to sit here and pretend like they're in this fight with the rest of us while forcing all of us to contribute to what I would say is a leftist.
Lefties want us to condemn our own because they want to create division.
And obviously, Don Jr. outlined that specifically there for you.
Their goal here is to create division.
And Jillian Michaels, one of them who is doing her best to push for that.
Listen, this woman hasn't paid her dues in politics.
She jumped on board at the very last minute and now wants to ride the gravy train.
She continues to land very high-profile politicians and such on her show.
And she hasn't paid her dues.
The rest of us have been in the battle for this for quite some time now.
But of course, this is what they do.
They platform people like Jillian Michaels because they want to create what you just heard there.
She doesn't probably realize it, but she is being divisive.
And it's not your job, your responsibility to condemn what another person has said.
I will never do that.
It's not my job.
It is not my job.
And so time and time again, we go out and we say this, but we need to push back.
Folks, before we run out of time, I really wanted to play this soundbite.
Get ready to get those tinfoil hats on.
Let's listen to the soundbite.
This is Patrick Bett David speaking to Dr. Marty McCary.
That's the individual who's leading the FDA right now.
He's the FDA director.
He was asked specifically about AIDS and how it came about.
And he has a very interesting, interesting perspective to all of that.
I want you to take a listen.
There's no clip number here, so I also make sure we have it.
It is the final one in our rundown.
Do we have that one?
Okay, well, hold off on that.
Don't worry, guys.
I know we got a limited time.
Let's jump over to clip 24 for now.
This is Donald Trump saying that Ilhan Omar needs to be thrown out of Congress.
We'll take a listen to that one.
donald j trump
You shouldn't be a congressman.
breanna morello
Yeah, but we should get her the hell out of this country.
I think I've played that sembite three times today just because I am obviously very biased, but I agree with the president.
Get her the hell out of this country.
What are we waiting on?
Denaturalize her and toss her out.
She doesn't belong here.
Her alliance is not with the United States of America.
She has declared that several times on the record.
We continue to allow her to stay here.
Folks, I'm done with those who are saying, oh, we're going to denaturalize all these people who have abandoned their oath, toss her out.
She doesn't belong here.
Stop talking about it and do it.
Do what she committed fraud to get into this country, just like all of her Somalian buddies do.
And it's time to get rid of her.
Time to get rid of her.
All right, we're going to turn to that missing clip and it's ready to go.
Let's take a listen.
tim walz
If I were to ask you right now, where did AIDS come from?
What would you say?
unidentified
You know, speaking of the film, thank you, Dr. Fauci.
They explore a non-traditional narrative which has not gotten the attention it deserves.
And that is that it may very well have come from a lab in Africa.
tim walz
AIDS could have come from a lab in Africa.
unidentified
HIV.
tim walz
HIV.
unidentified
Okay.
breanna morello
Ah, that's what they didn't want you talking about.
So, Dr. Marty McCarry telling us what we already knew from his official position as the FDA director.
I bet you.
I bet you, Dr. Fauci's not going to like that one.
Also, good news, guys.
Just got a message from my attorney.
My TSA lawsuit is officially settled.
You will have to pay my legal fees.
We'll be getting some of my fees, my personal fees that I coughed up to fight this lawsuit, handed back over to me because TSA is now admitting that they effed up.
And as many of you guys know, we've covered on this show.
We've talked about the report that I got all this from because I had to sue.
I had to sue the government to get them to be transparent.
Let me just break down to you what this lawsuit meant.
There were several different layers to this.
I sued TSA because they refused to hand over FOIA requests, the information that I'm legally allowed to obtain.
The Biden regime refused to hand it over.
And so let me tell you specifically what we were fighting for.
We were fighting for any internal memos or communications regarding how we were flying these illegal aliens who didn't have any types of photo IDs on commercial flights.
You need a photo ID.
You actually need a real ID and you need to submit to the system because they won't allow you to fly.
So why didn't we get this from illegal aliens?
Well, what did they need in return?
I was able to obtain these documents after suing, and lo and behold, we found out that they were allowing these illegal aliens to fly on flights based on, get this, if you were a convicted sex offender, you were able to present them with your convicted sex offender paperwork to get them to board on commercial flights.
We found that out because I had to sue TSA.
I was also looking for particular questions to be answered in regards to why so many January 6th defendants were added to a terror watch list.
Now, the federal government claimed in court, they ignored my request, but they claimed in court that it was a national security issue, and that's why they couldn't submit those internal communications on that.
But we've learned more and more about that through whistleblowers, of course.
We've been talking about it on this show.
Obviously, that came from Benny Thompson's office.
He sent over a letter, which then resulted in hundreds of you guys, probably likely our audience, being added to that terror watch list.
So they won't specifically give me the emails as to who the actual individuals were who called the shots on that, but we know that it fell from Benny Thompson's office.
So we learned a lot from this lawsuit, and I am thankful for the American people who have defended me in this because, unfortunately, you guys, taxpayers, have to cough up the legal expenses to all of this.
But TSA now officially admitting that they will settle this lawsuit with my attorney and myself.
So I have no financial gain in all of this.
It's just a matter of getting my legal fees covered.
And it looks like officially my attorney is saying that this case is closed, which is the good news.
All right, folks.
In the meantime, Cyber Monday.
So head on over to the AlexJonesStore.com in the meantime and make sure you stock up 60% off on the entire website right now.
Head on over, the AlexJonesstore.com.
It is now time to stock up.
Again, tomorrow, I'm hosting War Room and I've got an incredible lineup of guests joining us for just that.
So make sure you're here.
unidentified
In the meantime, though, the Alex Jones show starts now.
Tells you the truth about what's happening.
We'll join our regularly scheduled program after these messages.
alex jones
I am not funded by millionaires.
I'm not funded by anybody but you.
And I am in the middle of a major deep state battle.
We're the globalists.
We have shortfalls and we need your support.
So just go get a t-shirt, go get a ball cap, get the ultra medal and blue, get the IRC Moss.
And so you just commit to support us, sign up for auto ship, get 50% off.
Canceling time, it's not like a full commitment like you marry somebody.
You just subscribe to it or order it once when you get it and love it.
Go subscribe.
And then canceling time for free, but that way you get it every month or every two months, however you set it.
And then you, you know, just boom, boom, boom, you support us.
That way you don't have to worry about it each time.
I need people to commit to this fight like one one hundredth what I've committed.
Export Selection