Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| The United Kingdom is teetering on the edge of an identity crisis that will unleash a domino effect across Western civilization. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The European Union provides funding to member countries for accepting immigrants. | |
| Ireland receives this money, which then flows to developers, hotels, and the wealthy elite. | ||
| These elites funnel some of that same money back to the government through donations and gifts, creating a cycle of wealth and influence. | ||
| Meanwhile, immigrants are used to secure votes for the government, reinforcing their power. | ||
| As more money is printed to keep the system going, the wealthy become richer, while ordinary citizens like you and I suffer as the value of the Euro drops, widening the wealth defied. | ||
| A 2021 census lays out the stark reality exponentially ballooning across the UK. | ||
| 3,870,000 Muslims now make up 6.5% of England and Wales' population, a 44% surge since 2011, adding 1.16 million people and driving a third of the nation's population growth. | ||
| While in London, a whopping 15% Muslim. | ||
| As the Quran says, God does not burden any soul with more than it can bear. | ||
| And Birmingham, 30%. | ||
| This isn't a politically correct trend. | ||
| It's a tidal wave spiraling into an inevitable civil war. | ||
| And it's hitting every corner of the West with the same diabolical playbook. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just had a lovely lady screaming and shouting out of a window at those racist scum. | |
| So obviously, in England, in 2025, it makes you a racist to put your flag up in your own country. | ||
| As Western birth rates plummeted, British women now average 1.44 children, well below the 2.1 needed to sustain a population. | ||
| Then, by design, the elites flipped the script, crying about declining birth rates and aging workforces, opening the floodgates to uncontrolled migration. | ||
| And now, entire nations, cultures, and identities are on the chopping block. | ||
|
unidentified
|
America will be a Muslim country. | |
| Russia will be a Muslim country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Islam will enter every house. | |
| We have to be a part of that change. | ||
| Now enters Shabana Mahmood, Britain's new Home Secretary, appointed September 5th, 2025, in a cabinet reshuffle after Angelo Raynor's tax scandal, resignation. | ||
| Do you know the people that you see holding the English flag most of the time will be the EDL and they are white and they are male and they're bad people and they want to divide our communities from one another. | ||
| Mahmoud, the first Muslim woman to hold this office of state, oversees immigration, policing, MI5 and national security. | ||
| A Birmingham-born barrister of Pakistani descent, she's a Labour MP for a 70% non-white constituency and identifies with the socially conservative Blue Labour faction. | ||
| Regardless of her towing of English narratives in the past, she is now a gatekeeper for the inevitable attempt to establish Sharia law in the UK. | ||
| Like a lot of practicing Muslims, my faith is the most important thing in my life. | ||
| It is the absolute driver of everything that I do. | ||
| 30,000 boats entered the UK in 2024 alone. | ||
| Mahmood is tasked with stopping these boats, speeding up asylum deportations, and reforming a system where 27.8% of Muslim households live in social housing and 32.7% face overcrowding. | ||
| The real numbers tell a story they don't want you to hear. | ||
| Only 51.4% of Muslims aged 16 to 64 are employed, compared to 70.9% of all Brits. | ||
| Muslim women, just 37%. | ||
| Schools, 10% of kids are Muslim, despite Muslims being 6% of the population. | ||
| In Birmingham, 43.5% of those under 18 are Muslim. | ||
| In Manchester, 35%. | ||
| Meanwhile, British kids are a minority in 25% of London schools. | ||
| This is the demographic reality. | ||
| It's not a conspiracy, which leads anyone with any brains to question the endgame. | ||
| The UK is at a breaking point and the world's watching. | ||
| Will Mahmood stop the boats and restore trust? | ||
| Or will the New World Orders playbook continue unraveling the world? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Wednesday, September 10th in the year of our Lord 2025. | |
| And you're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| I think it's time to blow this scene. | ||
| Get everybody into stuff together. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, three, two, one this channel. | |
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Coming to you live this Wednesday morning from the crucible, from the heart of darkness here in America. | ||
| There's some crazy energy in the air today, and I think you'll agree with me. | ||
| We got some big stories, but it feels like something's about to happen. | ||
| I don't know what exactly, but there are some options I'll lay out for you. | ||
| But we've got a big story today about Poland apparently shooting down Russian drones. | ||
| I'm pressing X to doubt. | ||
| I'm doubting that this story is accurate, and I have got a lot of very good reasons why we should cast suspicion on this claim as Poland seeks to start invoking NATO articles to bring about that third world war they've been chomping at the bit for. | ||
| We also have massive protests and riots going on in France. | ||
| And I'm getting flashbacks to 2019. | ||
| In the height of irony, I don't know if y'all remember this. | ||
| In 2019, at the very end of 2019, I did a 2019 year in review. | ||
| And ironically, I called it 2019 the year the mask came off because 2019 was the year that you had all of these massive protest movements igniting across the world. | ||
| And the powers that be sort of went mask off and just shutting it down. | ||
| And just, yeah, we just don't actually believe any of the stuff that we say. | ||
| We're not actually about democracy. | ||
| We will just ruthlessly and heartlessly crush resistance to us. | ||
| The yellow vest, the Hong Kong riots. | ||
| I mean, it was everywhere. | ||
| South America was exploding in protest movements. | ||
| It was the year the mask came off. | ||
| And then, of course, 2020 was the year the mask went on. | ||
| So you have all these big protest movements bubbling up, taking the world by storm. | ||
| And all of the sudden, the height of all of it, everybody gets locked in their homes for six months. | ||
| Well, how convenient all those protest movements ended. | ||
| And I have a, I'm seeing a similar trend here. | ||
| Nepal's government was just, some of them were killed in their own home as, you know, like all of their government buildings have been burnt down and all of their ministers were hunted down in the streets by angry citizens. | ||
| In France now, they're burning things and rioting. | ||
| And of course, the UK has been protesting rather aggressively for the last little while. | ||
| Of course, in America, we're not seeing so much the Black Lives Matter style George Floyd uprising. | ||
| But the sentiment is there, but the energy is there after the murder of Irina Zarushka. | ||
| And I'm thinking if I was the elite, if I was the powers that be, I'd be flipping through my little Rolodex of crises, thinking, what do I do next? | ||
| We have a dirty bomb, go off in a major U.S. city. | ||
| Do we need to, you know, stage a major Russian invasion of Poland to get NATO going? | ||
| Do I have a white supremacist CIA wind-up toy, shoot up a black church? | ||
| I mean, what card do I play here? | ||
| Because things are getting a little out of hand. | ||
| They're getting a little out of control, and control is what it's all about. | ||
| So we'll tell you all about all that. | ||
| And then we got these vaccine hearings that I could just play for the entire show today. | ||
| I mean, it would be, it wouldn't even be irresponsible. | ||
| I mean, it'd be a good show. | ||
| It'd be an informative show, and it'd be a powerful show if I did nothing but just showed you the highlights of some of the vaccine hearings being held in the U.S. Senate yesterday. | ||
| Truly bombshell stuff that I'm going to show you a lot of videos from later today. | ||
| So you've got the entire pharmaceutical medical industry collapsing. | ||
| You've got white people talking about themselves as if we are a group that has interests for the first time ever. | ||
| And I think that's going to expand rapidly. | ||
| I think we're, I think that cat's out of the bag, quite frankly. | ||
| I think it's going to be interesting to see where that goes. | ||
| And so you've got all of these issues. | ||
| On top of it all, we've got a story today about our court case. | ||
| The InfoWars saga has been taken to a new level. | ||
| Very excited to tell you about that. | ||
| And so I'm getting ready for the show today, and I'm thinking about all this stuff and how just all of it seems to be coming to a head. | ||
| Everything seems to be reaching a boiling point. | ||
| And the thing I think I want to try to express is none of these things are separate from one another. | ||
| They're all actually part of exactly the same process taking place. | ||
| I want to try to draw all these things together and kind of explain how they're all just different facets of the same overall movement that does have everything to do with control. | ||
| It's all about control, folks. | ||
| Once you understand that, everything else can fit into place. | ||
| And again, we'll try to just expand out and take the 30,000-foot view and understand that, again, everything that they're doing is all about control, even the racial stuff. | ||
| Once you understand that the powers that be are just hyper-focused, very, very interested in just breeding rebellion out of the human race. | ||
| That's essentially what's going on here. | ||
| They're breeding rebellion out of the human race. | ||
| I think I can explain that. | ||
| And they're using war and they're using pharmaceuticals and they're using racial conflict to bring all this about. | ||
| But at the end of the day, they either want you dead or a slave. | ||
| There's no other option. | ||
| Okay, dead or a slave. | ||
| You either willfully submit to them or they will kill you. | ||
| That is the paradigm they're working on. | ||
| I want to explain how that informs everything else that we see going on in the world. | ||
| We'll begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch. | ||
| Here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Wednesday, the 10th of September, 2025. | ||
| Poland shoots down Russian drones that violated its airspace during Ukraine strike. | ||
| Poland has activated NATO Article 4 after downing 19 Russian drones that violated its airspace, making an unprecedented act of aggression. | ||
| All NATO members have expressed solidarity with Poland following the incident, which involved joint operations with Dutch F-35s, Polish F-16 jets. | ||
| Prime Minister Donald Tusk called the drone incursion an unprecedented violation and emphasized that the shooting down of drones was a success for NATO forces. | ||
| Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated that the incursions should be viewed as an attack on NATO, suggesting that Moscow is testing responses to its actions, because of course he is. | ||
| Couple problems with this. | ||
| One, they've already tried this. | ||
| They bombed Poland and tried to blame it on Russia. | ||
| But luckily for us, there was an independent news reporter on the scene before any of the officials. | ||
| So we got images of the missiles that fell showing that they were Ukrainian, not Russian. | ||
| That false flag was spoiled before it could even begin. | ||
| But I've got an interview that I'll show you later of the former prime minister, I believe, or president of Poland. | ||
| And he actually says in a recent interview that Zelensky tried to get him to claim that those were Russian missiles to start World War III, to get NATO involved by invoking Article 5 by calling the missiles Russian, even though they were Ukrainian. | ||
| The president of Poland has said that Zelensky tried to get him to do that and he refused. | ||
| So I'll show you that in just a little bit. | ||
| You also have, like just last week, there was a drone incursion into Poland. | ||
| And I remember this because I was scrolling through Twitter at some point and I saw somebody go, if they attack Poland, should we invoke Article 5? | ||
| And I was like, well, what? | ||
| Are they really doing this? | ||
| And it was so sort of nonsensical. | ||
| I didn't even pay attention to it. | ||
| I wish I had now. | ||
| I've gone back and found some of the coverage. | ||
| But yeah, on like August 20th, there was some drone fell in Poland and they were trying to invoke Article 5 over it. | ||
| Now they're trying to invoke Article 5 over this. | ||
| The drones that were shot down were unarmed. | ||
| They were like reconnaissance drones. | ||
| Russia claims they came from Ukraine. | ||
| Everybody else claims they came from Russia. | ||
| But ironically or coincidentally, you might say, Ursula van der Leyen, the primarch of the EU, is set to give the State of the Union today. | ||
| So isn't that interesting? | ||
| She was already planning on focusing on the rearmament of Europe and the threat of Russian aggression. | ||
| So very polite, very nice of Vladimir Putin to provide her with the very attack that she needs to make her speech justified. | ||
| So very polite of Putin. | ||
| He's really helping out, doing a favor for his European neighbors there. | ||
| Again, just absolutely absurd. | ||
| And that's not even all of the reasons why you should not trust this report and instead assume that this is NATO desperately trying to kickstart World War III before Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin can come to peace agreements. | ||
| We'll go more into that later, but just off the top, in a word, no. | ||
| No, we're not, I'm not believing it. | ||
| I'm not trusting it. | ||
| They are trying to start World War III. | ||
| And it's going to take something better than this. | ||
| All right. | ||
| You're going to have to nuke a city, okay? | ||
| They're going to have to nuke a city if they want to start World War III. | ||
| A couple of reconnaissance drones downed in a field outside Warsaw and not quite the false flag that we need to get behind a war. | ||
| Meanwhile, Michigan Judge tosses Democrat lawfare against 2020 electors. | ||
| In a major win for the rule of law, a Michigan judge dismissed Democrat-backed lawfare waged against the state's 2020 Republican electors on Tuesday, citing a lack of evidence for the charges. | ||
| Quote, this is a fraud case and we have to prove intent. | ||
| District Judge Kristen Simmons reportedly said during a Tuesday court hearing, and I don't believe there's evidence sufficient to prove intent. | ||
| So this is the just pure persecution case against Republicans who wanted to provide an alternative slate of electors since the 2020 election was stolen through a variety of electoral malfeasance. | ||
| And they wanted to send these people who were like 70-year-old just Republican volunteers that raised their hands when they asked if anybody was willing to be an alternative elector. | ||
| And they're like trying to charge them with terrorism and throw them in jail for several decades. | ||
| So good to see this is dropped. | ||
| I'd like to see retribution. | ||
| Again, let's just stop with the half measures. | ||
| I think we all just need to decide that like in a war, it's not enough to just defend. | ||
| We are fighting a war and it feels like we do nothing but play defense. | ||
| And it's like you can't win a war that way. | ||
| You have to go on the attack. | ||
| And when they attack you, when they launch a lawfare program against your entire political sphere and actually do throw people in jail and then try to throw grandmothers in jail for life for daring to participate in the political process, I think those people then have to be put into jail. | ||
| Those people have to be charged. | ||
| Those people have to be punished for abusing our system in that way. | ||
| It's not enough just to stop the attack. | ||
| You have to then counterattack. | ||
| How else are you going to win? | ||
| This is very, very basic stuff, but I guess we just need to push more. | ||
| Meanwhile, Qatar threatens to retaliate against Israel for Doha strike on Damas. | ||
| Qatar threatened to retaliate against Israel in the wake of an airstrike on Doha that targeted the leaders of Hamas, as the country's prime minister called the situation, a decisive moment for the Middle East. | ||
| Althani described Israel's strike on Hamas as state terrorism that's being exerted by somebody like Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. | ||
| I think we've reached a decisive moment. | ||
| There should be retaliation from the whole region in the face of those barbaric actions that only reflect one thing. | ||
| It reflects the barbarism of this person that is leading the region, unfortunately, to a point where we cannot address any situation. | ||
| We cannot repair anything. | ||
| We cannot work within the framework of international laws, Al Thani said. | ||
| He just violates all those international laws. | ||
| Hey, I agree. | ||
| Hey, I'm on your side, Al Thani. | ||
| That statement was more cohesive and reasonable and just more statesmanlike than anything I've ever heard out of Israel. | ||
| So do it, please, for the love of God. | ||
| You have to do it. | ||
| We are begging. | ||
| The world is begging you as the people surrounding Israel, destroy them. | ||
| I'm done. | ||
| I'm done even like modifying it. | ||
| They deserve it. | ||
| They deserve it. | ||
| Glass them, please. | ||
| Please free us. | ||
| Free us from these shackles of Israel. | ||
| Meanwhile, DOJ files federal charges against DiCarlos Brown in murder of Irana Zarushka. | ||
| Irina Zarushka. | ||
| The Department of Justice has filed federal charges against DeCarlos Brown Jr., the man arrested for the fatal stabbing of Ukrainian refugee on a Charlotte, North Carolina light rail train in August. | ||
| Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote, Irina Zaruska was a young woman living in the American dream. | ||
| Her horrific murder is a direct result of failed soft on crime policies that put criminals before innocent people. | ||
| I've directed my attorneys to federally prosecute DeCarlos Brown Jr., a repeat violent offender with a history of violent crime for murder. | ||
| We will seek the maximum penalty for this unforgivable act of violence. | ||
| He will never again see the light of day as a free man. | ||
| So that's good to see. | ||
| And of course, Donald Trump, just earlier this year, I believe, reinvoked the federal death penalty. | ||
| So he will be on the hook for the death penalty for that. | ||
| We'll get back into that. | ||
| Again, that continues to be the top story. | ||
| There was a point yesterday that I hit where I could not think about this anymore because it made me too sad. | ||
| So I'm not going to show the video. | ||
| I'm going to ask Crew not to show the video. | ||
| I don't think we need to see it again, although it's everywhere. | ||
| If you'd like to see it, you're more than welcome to find it. | ||
| But we are going to talk about the events surrounding it. | ||
| We're going to talk about the reaction to it. | ||
| We're going to talk about where we need to go from here. | ||
| But you know, yesterday, it was like you think you get to a point, and in a way, it's like, it's like, oh, something can pierce through. | ||
| I mean, you watch this stuff every show for five years. | ||
| You see just the worst stuff in the world. | ||
| And I've been doing the show for five years. | ||
| I've been looking at this stuff for 20 years. | ||
| At a certain point, you're like, am I numb? | ||
| Am I numb to all of this? | ||
| And you see a video like that, and it really hits you, and you feel the shivers, and you just go, okay, no, I can still be shocked. | ||
| I can still be shocked and horrified at the behavior of my fellow humans. | ||
| And I think I'm like, this is too much. | ||
| I got to turn this off. | ||
| I got to look away. | ||
| And as I'm about to click away, as I'm about to click off X or whatever I'm on, I see one last post. | ||
| I see one last post that piques my interest. | ||
| And I take a look at it. | ||
| And it is an article, an interview with a Chicago-born Israeli sniper. | ||
| And it might be the most, the single most horrifying thing I've ever read in my entire life. | ||
| So I'm going to read it to you today. | ||
| So we're going to get into that a little bit later, too. | ||
| But I just feel like for the past year or so, it's like every, at least once a week, I'm like, this has got to be the bottom, right? | ||
| This has got to be, there's no way we can keep falling down a pit, right? | ||
| At a certain point, there's got to be a bottom of the pit, right? | ||
| I mean, pits have bottoms, don't they? | ||
| Don't they usually have a point to which you cannot get any lower? | ||
| But no, we just keep going deeper and deeper and deeper into hell. | ||
| So I'll read you that too. | ||
| Just fair warning. | ||
| It might change the way you see the world. | ||
| That's just how bad it is. | ||
| We'll get into that. | ||
| But finally, we have this and a bit of good news: a potential shining light in the darkness. | ||
| Alex Jones takes $1 billion Sandy Hook judgment to Supreme Court. | ||
| Right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Connecticut court's nearly $1.4 billion judgment against him and Infowars stemming from his false claims that the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre was a hoax. | ||
| The default judgment entered against Jones and his Infowars parent company in 2022 after minor discovery violations was an unjust and disproportionate penalty. | ||
| Jones' lawyers told the justice in a petition filed on September 5th and obtained by Bloomberg Law. | ||
| The judgment runs afoul of First Amendment protections established in New York Times for Sullivan, they said. | ||
| Quote, it is an amount that can never be paid, which based on the trial court's findings may not be dischargeable in bankruptcy, they said. | ||
| The result is a financial death penalty by fiat imposed by media on a media defendant whose broadcasts reach millions. | ||
| The filing to the high court is one of Jones' last avenue to reverse the judgment obtained against him in Infowars' parent company, Free Speech Systems LLC. | ||
| The request comes shortly after a Texas state court appointed a receiver to oversee the media company, a significant breakthrough. | ||
| In efforts for Sandy Hook, shooting victims, families owed more than $1 billion after collection efforts sputtered for years in bankruptcy court. | ||
| The Texas Appeals Court paused the receivership in order in late August. | ||
| Jones and Free Speech Systems lawyers told the justices that because the Connecticut court sanctions were the result of a default judgment rather than merit-based, the families never actually proved these specific claims about the shooting were false or that he made them with actual malice. | ||
| The justices should review whether state courses can issue such death penalty default sanctions brought by public figures against media defendants reporting on issues of public concern, Jones' team said. | ||
| Death penalty sanctions are judicially decreed penalties or liability for all alleged claims due to litigation misconduct, such as discovery abuse. | ||
| The justices were also asked to answer whether liability can be imposed on media entities for acts of unrelated third parties and to find whether a serious threat needs to be shown to award punitive damages based on default sanctions. | ||
| Allowing the ruling to stand will chill new reporting and risk hurting other broadcasts, other broadcasters, Jones' lawyer argued. | ||
| A six-person Connecticut jury awarded 15 family members and one FBI agent who responded to the attack $965 million in compensatory damages and $471.7 million for other damages. | ||
| The jury found Jones and Free Speech System financially liable for spreading falsehoods about the 2012 shooting, which killed 20 children and six school staffers. | ||
| So this is going to the Supreme Court. | ||
| And we can get into this. | ||
| I think if the InfoWars audience is paying attention, they know about as much about this as I do from what Alex has said. | ||
| And again, people are often like, what's really going on behind the scenes at InfoWars? | ||
| I'm like, watch the shows. | ||
| We literally talk to each other through the shows. | ||
| Like, I hear about what's going on from the shows. | ||
| So you probably know as much as I do, but I have done some extra legwork because it takes extra legwork to even figure out whether what happened in our case is normal or not. | ||
| And the ultimate conclusion that you'll come to if you actually look into the decisions that were made and the precedents set previous to our case is that what has been done to InfoWars is entirely unprecedented. | ||
| Never happened like this ever in history. | ||
| There is no example. | ||
| I couldn't find one. | ||
| Maybe someone out there knows one. | ||
| I looked and looked and looked. | ||
| I've never been able to find an example of a default judgment being issued in the way that it was issued against InfoWars. | ||
| I mean, you can look it up, and default judgments, the vast majority of time, is when people literally do not respond to summons. | ||
| They cannot be contacted. | ||
| They refuse to show up for court. | ||
| They refuse to provide any evidence. | ||
| They're just completely stonewalling the discovery process and just radio silence. | ||
| And after like months and months and months of trying to get a response, if they don't hear anything, then they go, all right, then we decide in the favor of the plaintiffs or whatever. | ||
| In our case, from my understanding, layman here, but from my understanding, what happened to get us the default judgment was they demanded documents that don't exist that would have proved their case against us if they did exist, but they don't. | ||
| They demanded those documents. | ||
| We said those don't exist. | ||
| The judge said they're withholding documents, default judgment. | ||
| Totally unprecedented, totally unlike it's supposed to be applied, totally unlike any other case in history, as far as I can tell. | ||
| This does not happen to any company, let alone a media company, being charged for the actions of people completely unrelated to us, who we didn't instruct to do anything, but simply by covering a topic, and then other people act on the information that's out there, whether we cover it or not, whether it comes from us or not, and then we get blamed for it because we covered the topic. | ||
| We'll get back into this on the other side. | ||
| I really hope the Supreme Court backs us on this. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| So, yes, from Bloomberg.com, and they should know Alex Jones takes $1 billion Sandy Hook judgment to Supreme Court. | ||
| And again, looking into this, just as a layman, I guess, I mean, I have access to as much information as made public. | ||
| I'm using Crock, Grok, and Chat GPT. | ||
| I'm really trying to figure out what exactly was the decision made here. | ||
| Why exactly did it happen like this? | ||
| And at a certain point, you get down the rabbit hole and it's like, okay, the default judgment came because we sent the information to the plaintiffs, but we forgot to CC one of their lawyers or something. | ||
| And that was it. | ||
| It's a default judgment. | ||
| It's like, wait, so we provided the information. | ||
| We CC'd 15 people, but there was a 16 person that was accidentally left off the list. | ||
| Therefore, we owe $1.4 billion. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| I'm sorry, what exactly is going on? | ||
| Like, it's hard to even find what the reasoning is. | ||
| Because again, default judgments, and you can look this up, they're extremely rare, period. | ||
| Like, they almost never happen ever in anything. | ||
| The vast majority of the time that they happen, it's when, you know, it's for like small claims stuff where, you know, a divorced couple, the ex-wife is suing the ex-husband and the ex-husband flees to Mexico. | ||
| That's a default judge. | ||
| It's like, well, he won't show up. | ||
| He's not responding. | ||
| We served him, but he didn't, but he's not answering us. | ||
| So you win. | ||
| So you win. | ||
| That's like the vast majority of cases when it's, and it's there for those cases when the people just like do not respond and just completely ignore. | ||
| And there's been like, I could find like one other case where like, I think it was Nestle or something, like there's one other case where a big corporation got a default judgment. | ||
| But again, it's because they just straight up refused to answer the summons to the court. | ||
| And then like even just looking back over it now and going back over some of the some of the articles or just like asking Grok about it. | ||
| And basically, as I understand it, again, all of this is with the caveat of as a layman and from my, you know, I'm just going entirely off public information. | ||
| As I understand it, they, they, the entire court system, when it comes to defamation or defamation against a media corporation is all about money and you, it's, it's proving that you're either stopping somebody from making money or you lied about somebody in order to make money. | ||
| So it's all it's all about money and the charges are monetary and the damages are monetary. | ||
| And so they were trying to prove that Alex and Infowars was covering Sandy Hook, lying about Sandy Hook because it made money. | ||
| And so they wanted us to provide them with documents showing that we looked at our analytics, saw that Sandy Hook made us money, and therefore designed shows talking about Sandy Hook in order to make money. | ||
| And we don't have those documents because we don't do that type of stuff. | ||
| And again, if you watch the depositions from these cases, it is baffling because it's like they're trying not to understand what's being said. | ||
| I should clip out these pieces, but there's one point, I think it was in Daria's deposition, where it's like they refuse to understand that there's no script for Alex Jones. | ||
| So she's trying to explain, like, no, we have a radio log where Alex talks about stuff and we write down what he says as he's talking to keep track of it. | ||
| Because what happens is we do a three or Alex has a four-hour show. | ||
| At the end of it, we have a big log going, okay, in segment one, you talked about this. | ||
| In segment two, you talked about this. | ||
| So then we can go back and cut out videos without having to watch the whole thing through again. | ||
| It's just a matter of convenience for us in editing and just keeping track of what was talked about on the show that day. | ||
| And they're asking her about this, and they cannot understand that it's not something that we do before the show. | ||
| So she's like, it's a radio log. | ||
| We just, we type out what Alex talks about as he's talking about it. | ||
| And they're like, okay, so this is something you provide to him before the show, explaining what he's going to talk about. | ||
| And it's like, no, we just, we write it as it goes. | ||
| And there's just this like disconnect where it's like, okay, do they really not understand? | ||
| Do they really not understand how this works? | ||
| But the point is they're trying to portray it as if Alex is told what to say and that there's a script for Alex to follow. | ||
| And that's informed by what gets the most clicks and what is making us money. | ||
| And so in their assumption, we're behind the scenes going, oh, Sandy Hook gets us a lot of hits. | ||
| Okay, tell Alex to talk about Sandy Hook. | ||
| And then we type out a script for Alex to go up and talk about Sandy Hook because it makes us money. | ||
| It's just not how it works here. | ||
| It's just we don't have that documentation because we don't do that. | ||
| And so like, literally, that is what they did the default judgment on. | ||
| It was stuff like that, where they're like, where are the documents showing that you had meetings, you know, talking about how Sandy Hook was profitable? | ||
| We don't have that. | ||
| And they're like, you're withholding it from us. | ||
| Default judgment. | ||
| Or the Google Analytics. | ||
| We got kicked off of Google Analytics. | ||
| We don't have access to Google Analytics. | ||
| So Google kicks us off their platform. | ||
| The judge demands information from their platform. | ||
| We can't get access to it. | ||
| They charge, they give us a default judgment, completely unprecedented. | ||
| Again, just not the way default judgments work. | ||
| Not the way they're supposed to work. | ||
| Not the way they've ever worked in any other situation. | ||
| And just take Alex Jones out of it, take InfoWars out of it, and just understand what this really is. | ||
| This is saying that you can dredge up a story that a media outlet covered 10 years ago. | ||
| You can take actions done by random individuals completely unassociated with that media outlet. | ||
| Say, because that person did something to me, I'm going to charge you. | ||
| And if you don't provide me with the evidence showing that you're guilty, then I'm going to declare you guilty. | ||
| And then we're going to have a show trial where we have a jury and we have witnesses, but the witnesses are told what they can and can't say. | ||
| They're forbidden from invoking the First Amendment. | ||
| All this other, like completely arbitrary restrictions, but it's going to be televised. | ||
| So, everybody's going to be able to tune in and watch what looks an awful lot like a trial, but is not a trial. | ||
| And it's going to look an awful lot like a jury, but it's not really a jury because they're not actually deciding anything. | ||
| They're just deciding how guilty you are. | ||
| And again, Alex came up with the phrases that explain this absurdity as well as you possibly can. | ||
| It's not even guilty until proven innocent. | ||
| It was guilty until proven guilty. | ||
| Guilty until they decide how guilty you are. | ||
| And again, I mean, you can do all this, you know, research yourself, but like Grock doesn't even understand what I'm saying when I'm asking about big cases where default judgments occur because it doesn't happen. | ||
| Like literally, I'm asking, so I ask Grock, what are some big court cases decided by default judgment? | ||
| And it basically gets confused. | ||
| And it's like, well, there's lots of like credit card default cases that go into judgment because default judgments aren't like big case things. | ||
| It doesn't happen with big cases. | ||
| It shouldn't. | ||
| It's not supposed to. | ||
| Well, not big case in terms of public prominence. | ||
| This case is cited in legal discussions as an example of default judgment being vacated due to improper service of process. | ||
| The defendant successfully demonstrated they were not properly served, et cetera, et cetera. | ||
| Like it just, it genuinely doesn't happen. | ||
| It's not a thing. | ||
| High-profile court cases, such as those reaching the U.S. Supreme Court involving major constitutional issues, are rarely decided by default judgment. | ||
| Default judgments are procedural rather than substantive, meaning they do not reflect a court's evaluation of the case's merits. | ||
| For example, in Masters v. | ||
| Lever, it was clarified that a default judgment does not imply the court agrees with the plaintiff's claims, allowing the defendants to potentially re-argue the facts in future proceedings. | ||
| Defendants can move to set aside a default judgment by showing valid reasons such as improper service, excusable neglect, or other justifiable circumstances, e.g., hospitalization. | ||
| In jurisdictions like California, defendants typically have 30 days from the notice of entry to file such a motion. | ||
| Once granted, default judgments allow plaintiffs to pursue remedies like wage garnishments or asset seizures, which can have significant consequences for defendants. | ||
| Challenges in identifying big default judgment cases. | ||
| Search results and available information do not highlight specific high-profile court cases decided by default judgment, as these judgments are typically associated with lower stakes or less publicized civil disputes. | ||
| So I'm telling you, it doesn't happen typically. | ||
| And the reason it happened in this case is because it was a loophole. | ||
| It's a loophole. | ||
| It's a legal loophole that they found to destroy Alex Jones. | ||
| It's pretty damn simple, actually. | ||
| It's just completely unfair and totally unwarranted, unprecedented nonsense, as far as I can tell. | ||
| And again, so I asked Grock, and it's like, yeah, there are no big cases decided by default judgment. | ||
| That doesn't happen. | ||
| That's not what default judgments are. | ||
| And I'm like, okay, well, what about Alex Jones? | ||
| And it's like, oh, right, right. | ||
| Yeah, that's one, right? | ||
| It's the only one, though. | ||
| So it's just such a rare and out-of-context situation that I guess Grock forgot about it. | ||
| In November 2021, Connecticut Supreme Court Judge Barbara Bellis issued a default judgment against Jones and Infowar's parent company, Free Speech Systems, and four consolidated defamation cases. | ||
| The default was due to Jones' repeated failure to comply with discovery obligations, including refusing to provide financial documents and website analytics data. | ||
| And you've heard Alex say over and over, we literally gave them our QuickBooks. | ||
| They have full access to our bank account. | ||
| They have all of the financial information they could ever possibly need. | ||
| And what they wanted was documents that don't exist. | ||
| They're going, where are the emails between your marketing team and your producers about what to cover? | ||
| And we're like, we don't have that. | ||
| And they're like, so you're hiding it from us. | ||
| So you're withholding. | ||
| It doesn't exist here. | ||
| And we've explained this before as well. | ||
| Because M4s is not a normal company. | ||
| We're not a normal media outlet. | ||
| Yeah, most media outlets you go and you go, okay, show us the rundown where you tell the host what to say. | ||
| And they have that information. | ||
| And that information has been informed by the marketing team who has, you know, done the analytics and tells us, you know, tells whoever it is what to cover and what not to cover. | ||
| We have absolutely none of that here. | ||
| We have none of that here. | ||
| We don't look, I don't look at the Google analytics. | ||
| I hardly even look at the view count. | ||
| We cover what we think is interesting and think is important and what our callers tell us they want to hear about. | ||
| It's very organic. | ||
| There is no corporate superstructure dictating our coverage depending on what's popular and what's not. | ||
| It just doesn't exist. | ||
| They demand evidence that it does exist. | ||
| We say there is no evidence it exists. | ||
| They say you're hiding it from us. | ||
| Therefore, we give you a default judgment. | ||
| I'm telling you, that's actually what happened here. | ||
| Now, how this ever got through, I guess this has been through one appeals court, a mid-level Connecticut state appeals court, and Connecticut Supreme Court denied a request to review. | ||
| So it's going up to the Supreme Court. | ||
| I would hope that the Supreme Court would see the just genuine, just overwhelming absurdity in every aspect of what we've been through. | ||
| And just to lay it out again, in case you're new here, in case you're unfamiliar with how this whole process went down, Alex Jones talked about Sandy Hook in 2012, 2013, after the immediate event, because Sandy Hook basically superseded 9-11 as the conspiracy theory topic du jour. | ||
| And it was everywhere. | ||
| You used to be able to go on YouTube and type Sandy Hook, and you would see page after page after page after page, hundreds or thousands of videos about Sandy Hook from all different creators, from hundreds of creators. | ||
| Alex Jones is not nearly the most prominent among them. | ||
| In fact, there are multiple major Sandy Hook documentaries that have contributions from like 30 different journalists and investigators and researchers. | ||
| None of them Alex Jones. | ||
| And those are the documentaries that really, you know, progress the theory and all that. | ||
| So this is just a topic that everybody's covering. | ||
| Alex Jones didn't, he didn't come up with it. | ||
| He didn't, he wasn't the first to, you know, say there was something suspicious about this. | ||
| I mean, personally, I watched Sandy Hook happen live from home. | ||
| And I still have some questions about lies that were told and about the way the whole thing unfolded in the most suspicious way possible. | ||
| And my point of saying that, obviously, is this wasn't something that Alex Jones came up with on his own and everybody just followed his lead. | ||
| It was something that millions of people all over the country, all in one movement, all went, wait, what? | ||
| Wait, but I saw the guy running through the woods. | ||
| Why did they tell me he didn't exist? | ||
| How did that, why is the guy rehearsing? | ||
| This is weird. | ||
| This is all very weird. | ||
| Every like millions of people thought it looked weird. | ||
| Alex Jones was one of them. | ||
| So why is he the one that gets all the blame for it? | ||
| Well, the answer is in the timing of when this court case came about. | ||
| It didn't come about 2013, 2014, 2015, or even most of 2016. | ||
| The first, the media campaign to associate Alex Jones with Sandy Hook was launched within days of Donald Trump getting elected. | ||
| So for 10 years almost, I guess at that point, it was like half a decade. | ||
| For half a decade, there's no articles associating Alex Jones with Sandy Hook. | ||
| There's no reports saying this guy, Alex Jones, came up with a Sandy Hook thing. | ||
| It wasn't his. | ||
| He wasn't the guy. | ||
| A lot of other people were a lot more prominent in the Sandy Hook world. | ||
| Alex Jones was on the periphery, if anything. | ||
| And it wasn't, he didn't cover it for years. | ||
| But then the powers that be realized how effective Alex Jones is politically. | ||
| And they realized what an impact InfoWars had in getting Donald Trump elected. | ||
| So the day after he got elected, they published the first story saying Donald Trump hangs out with Alex Jones and Alex Jones questions Sandy Hook. | ||
| It's the first time that Alex Jones and Sandy Hook were written together in an article, and it was about Donald Trump and how dangerous Alex Jones was because he got Donald Trump elected and how Sandy Hook would now be branded with him. | ||
| And from that point on, the gates were open. | ||
| So it has nothing to do with really nothing to do with Sandy Hook in general. | ||
| I mean, it's just that's the excuse that they're using to try to bring down Alex Jones, something that they themselves have said over and over and over again. | ||
| So, I mean, we can take your calls on this. | ||
| I'm praying, again, I'm just praying to God that the Supreme Court of the United States can actually look at this in an objective way and will actually take this case and will actually concern themselves with the fact that high-powered lawyers have spent tens of millions of dollars to eradicate the First Amendment rights of a broadcaster. | ||
| That's the point here. | ||
| Take Alex Jones out of it, take Infowars out of it. | ||
| Do high-powered law firms have a right to dig up coverage from 10 years ago that Alex Jones corrected? | ||
| He'd apologize for it. | ||
| I mean, there had been no, you know, malicious ignoring of the facts that came in. | ||
| No, he'd apologize. | ||
| In fact, it was the apology that may have really put chum in the water for them. | ||
| So it was completely political, completely unprecedented, the default judgment, completely unwarranted and unjustified because we were participating in discovery. | ||
| We did give them everything we had. | ||
| We just didn't have stuff they asked for because it didn't exist. | ||
| But of course, this is just part of the overall law fare. | ||
| Again, we'll get into some of the other stuff going on today, which is good. | ||
| Some of the other lawfare cases are being dropped. | ||
| But again, it's a question of whether people who say themselves that their whole goal of bringing this case forward is to silence Alex Jones. | ||
| It's not something we have to speculate about or we have to say, hey, this is the consequence of what's happening. | ||
| Therefore, that must be their intent. | ||
| No, they tell us their intent. | ||
| They, in their own words, have said over and over and over again, the whole point of these cases is to silence Alex Jones, take his megaphone away, make sure that he can't do this anymore to anybody else. | ||
| In other words, so he can't cover stories in a way that is contrary to the mainstream media. | ||
| Should that be allowed? | ||
| I mean, do you think the Supreme Court is going to think that should be allowed? | ||
| You should be allowed to bankrupt a media company because you don't like what they say. | ||
| Like, this isn't gawker. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| This isn't, this isn't, you know, Alex Jones didn't steal somebody's personal naughty video and upload it without permission, right? | ||
| That was a case where they deserved it. | ||
| And the way they acted was flagrant and completely unjustified and unwarranted. | ||
| Alex Jones talked about a public event that literally millions of people were talking about. | ||
| But again, you got to understand how the censorship goes into this, how they launched these cases, right? | ||
| As Alex Jones getting kicked off of all the social media platforms all at once. | ||
| And it's not just Alex Jones getting kicked off the media platform so he can't defend himself and can't say the truth and in the face of the lies being pushed by the mainstream media, which obviously is a major disability in us airing our side of the story to the public. | ||
| But it was about deleting all the other videos. | ||
| What about all of the hundreds and thousands of videos on YouTube questioning Sandy Hook from everybody that's not Alex Jones? | ||
| Oh, they don't exist on YouTube anymore. | ||
| So now if you go to YouTube and search Sandy Hook, it's Alex Jones. | ||
| It's the reports about Alex Jones leaking him to Sandy Hook that you see on YouTube. | ||
| Didn't used to be that way. | ||
| It'd be a little bit ridiculous if they're going, Alex Jones came up with a Sandy Hook conspiracy. | ||
| And then you go on YouTube, there's tens of thousands of videos from everybody who's not Alex Jones talking about this. | ||
| You might go, well, wait, why are they blaming this guy? | ||
| It looks like there's hundreds of people way more interested in this than Alex Jones ever was. | ||
| So they delete those, they censor those, and then they tell you it was all Alex Jones. | ||
| And there's no proof to the contrary, unless you go to something like BitChute or Rumble, where all those documentaries still exist. | ||
| You should watch them. | ||
| By the way, you should watch them. | ||
| This course is almost part and parcel for just being a outspoken right-wing dissident in this country these days. | ||
| And on that note, I want to go to clip number seven here because this was Enrique Tario on with Joe Biggs yesterday. | ||
| And this whole video is long, but I thought the beginning was really powerful. | ||
| So we'll watch the first two minutes or so here. | ||
| Clip number seven, this is Enrique Tario yesterday on the war room with Joe Biggs. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| He attempting to overthrow the U.S. government, right? | ||
| And just in those changing of words and putting that in people's head, oh, these are seditions. | ||
| These are seditions. | ||
| That cost us that, well, that almost cost us decades of our lives because they decided to change the definition of a word. | ||
| Like those words should be used in their context. | ||
| Like sedition should be used if somebody attempts to overthrow the government by the use of force, right? | ||
| Using firearms, going after, you know, those are acts of sedition. | ||
| But it's not even just in and out of the Capitol. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| But I'm saying it's not even just that too. | ||
| The other part of the sedition is in order to overthrow the government, you have to have had people picked to place in the positions of power. | ||
| So you would have had to have had who was going to be the president, the vice president, the secretary of war, the head of the IRS, you know, the department of, you know, whatever, the DOJ, attorney general, all this stuff. | ||
| You had to have that kind of, you know, well, that's what it is now. | ||
| You know, too. | ||
| And maybe one day I'll get to be that. | ||
| But look. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Go ahead. | ||
| That's part of it. | ||
| That's, that's part of the definition of what that was. | ||
| Just the same thing with conspiracy. | ||
| Look what they did with conspiracy. | ||
| Conspiracy is, you know, two or more people sitting down and they have a conversation and they make a plan and they agree upon something to do. | ||
| Then it changed to, no, it doesn't have to be a plan or a meeting of the minds. | ||
| It just has to be a wink or a nod in a split second that there has to be no spoken words. | ||
| Like they literally changed judicial, they changed these terms in real time so they can convict us. | ||
| And if that doesn't scare the American people, I don't know what else does. | ||
| I mean, maybe a hooded guy on the back of a train ready to cut your throat, but you know, that's really what they're doing. | ||
| Right now, when they change the words, that's the same thing as a hooded guy sitting behind you. | ||
| And anytime you're ready to cut your throat, because we were sitting here being normal, peaceful human beings. | ||
| And then the judicial system came in. | ||
| America versus the Proud Boys came in with a knife right up our neck and slit our throat and threw us in prison, tried to take our life from us. | ||
| They wanted to give us 36 years or 34 years, both of us. | ||
| You can watch that full video. | ||
| That's just part of the hour-long conversation between Joe Biggs and Enrique Tario yesterday. | ||
| They don't care. | ||
| They are abusing the law. | ||
| They are flagrant criminals trying to destroy the right wing. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is the topic of law fair these days. | |
| By the way, we'll be joined by Stuart Rhodes in the third hour. | ||
| An expert in law fair, you might say. | ||
| One of the most prominent victims of it. | ||
| Let's go to clip number six here. | ||
| CNN sort of let the mask slip a little bit. | ||
| They admitted something they were supposed to pretend they didn't know. | ||
| Whoopsie daisy. | ||
| They let the cat out of the bag here. | ||
| Let's go to clip number six now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wait a minute. | |
| Did she just say this out loud? | ||
| Check it out. | ||
| Agree with you. | ||
| That Democrats cannot only be the party of resistance. | ||
| We cannot, like, we resisted so hard between 2017 and 2024. | ||
| We impeached the guy. | ||
| Like we prosecuted him, convicted him on 34 felony counts. | ||
| And guess what? | ||
| He still got elected. | ||
| So I don't know how much harder we can resist right now. | ||
| Are you admitting that the case against Trump in New York was part of the organized Democratic Party resistance? | ||
| It was a Democratic prosecutor. | ||
| And at the time, I said I thought it was unwise. | ||
| I went on Fox News and said actually, everybody who now touts the 34 felonies, take it from Liz. | ||
| This was not a real case. | ||
| This was a plot to upend the presidential campaign, which I just think it was a boneheaded move by Alvin Bragg, but it's not his first or last one. | ||
| This is why we invite Liz because she's a plain spoken neighbor. | ||
| Who can really tell it? | ||
| Yeah, they're like, this is why we invite this lady because she's actually allowed to say what she thinks versus us who might be fired, right? | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| When is CNN going to get canceled? | ||
| I want to know your thoughts. | ||
| And until then, stay elevated. | ||
| When is CNN going to get canceled or when you or when are any of these people going to be held to account for abusing our system? | ||
| It's not like a small thing. | ||
| They're like laughing at it. | ||
| They tried to send Trump to jail for life. | ||
| They just completely demolished our system of governance going after Donald Trump. | ||
| The precedents they set, the lengths they were willing to go. | ||
| And now they're out there admitting, yeah, yeah, that was all just as if we needed them to admit that, right? | ||
| As if we needed their acknowledgement of what has been imminently observable from the beginning. | ||
| None of these cases had any merit. | ||
| None of them were warranted. | ||
| All of them were predicated entirely on the political outcome. | ||
| So they need to be punished. | ||
| What do we not understand about this? | ||
| And that, I guess, is the question of the year at this point. | ||
| How do we get Republicans to take this crap seriously? | ||
| And not just shrug it off. | ||
| I got another video here. | ||
| Let's go to clip number. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I thought I just had it. | |
| Because there's another K16. | ||
| Let's go to clip 16 really quick here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Started in Texas. | |
| Republicans blowing up the maps. | ||
| They're trying to draw new district lines. | ||
| It will get them more seats out of Texas. | ||
| So currently, there are 25 Republican seats in Texas, 13 Democratic. | ||
| Now, the new map Republicans have drawn could, could, depending on how this all plays out, get them up to 30 seats out of Texas. | ||
| That would be a gain of five new seats for Republicans just out of Texas, adding that margin they could afford to lose potentially in the midterms next year. | ||
| And of course, the Democrats have responded to this. | ||
| Gavin Newsom in California, he and his party drawing new lines out there. | ||
| They're going to have to be approved by the voters this November. | ||
| That's a big if. | ||
| But if those new lines are approved, that could be a gain of five new seats for the Democrats. | ||
| And you say, oh, it's all awash, right? | ||
| Well, no, because other states are getting in on this too. | ||
| And this is the advantage, at least for 2026, that Republicans may have. | ||
| There are more red states potentially in position to do this for 26 than there are blue states. | ||
| So you see Ohio right now. | ||
| They could get Republicans three new seats out of Ohio, potentially. | ||
| Republicans are doing this in Indiana, could gain a seat out of Indiana. | ||
| They're doing it in Missouri, it looks like, could gain a seat there. | ||
| They're talking about doing it in Kansas, could gain a seat there. | ||
| Florida, they could gain maybe three new seats out of Florida. | ||
| Look at all these other Republican states. | ||
| Okay, so there's like five or six red states where we could redistrict and gain seats. | ||
| California, I think maybe only one more is one where the Democrats could do it. | ||
| Now, they wanted to start this fight. | ||
| Texas having to redistrict because our demographic change. | ||
| And in response, California's like, well, then we're going to redistrict to give Democrats more seats. | ||
| Okay, well, now every Republican state needs to be doing this. | ||
| It's not an option. | ||
| I get it. | ||
| I don't like our system being like this either, but this is the way the system is. | ||
| You have to fight to win. | ||
| Here's a victory waiting for you to grab it. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| I'll try to get into all this news and just blast through it here in the next few hours. | ||
| I do want to remind you to go to thealixjonesstore.com. | ||
| Free $10 ultimate fundraiser sale is on right now. | ||
| You're getting free $10 credit with every order over $75. | ||
| It is a critical fundraiser sale. | ||
| It's only happening for a limited time. | ||
| You're going to want to go to thealexjonestore.com, try the ultramethylene blue, the bovine colostrum plus, the shilajit complex. | ||
| And by the way, if you sign up for the scheduled deliveries, you save 50% off these products. | ||
| And you get even more savings. | ||
| If you're a VIP member, go today, thealexjonesstore.com, support us, keep us on the air, and in the fight. | ||
| Now, I have a lot to cover. | ||
| Let's see if I can't lay out for you what's actually going on in Poland. | ||
| Because the story is Poland shoots down Russian drones that violated its airspace during Ukraine strike. | ||
| Poland has activated NATO Article 4 after downing 19 Russian drones that violated its airspace, making an unprecedented act of aggression. | ||
| All NATO members have expressed solidarity with Poland following the incident, which involved joint operations with Dutch F-35s and Polish F-16 jets. | ||
| Prime Minister Donald Tusk called the drone incursion an unprecedented violation and emphasized that shooting down of drones was a success for NATO forces. | ||
| Vladimir Zelensky stated the incursion should be viewed as an attack on NATO, suggesting that Moscow is testing its responses to its actions. | ||
| Now, this happens to arrive on the eve of von der Leyen, Ursula von der Leyen's address, State of the Union address to the EU, where she plans on focusing on EU militarization. | ||
| So again, very kind, very nice, very thoughtful of Vladimir Putin to provide her with the example and talking point that she needs here on the eve of her warmongering address. | ||
| The principal elements of her speech are clear in advance. | ||
| Calls to stand firm against Russia, support for Ukraine, and an accelerated pace of EU militarization. | ||
| The main points of her speech are already known, which the Commission regards as key political events in Brussels in September. | ||
| They have also been reported by several European media outlets, the principal elements, to stand firm against Russia, support for Ukraine, and an accelerated pace of EU militarization with particular emphasis on digital technologies and AI-based systems. | ||
| Von der Leyen will also voice support for continuing the green transition. | ||
| However, sources indicate this topic will receive less attention than in previous years as it no longer represents the Commission's core ideological agenda, which now is war. | ||
| Is war always war. | ||
| We must have war. | ||
| So, you know, this is the equivalent of and really just right and perfect, you know, fulfillment of the pattern of Nord Stream 2 or Bashir al-Assad chemical weapon attacking his own people. | ||
| It's absurd. | ||
| It's nonsense. | ||
| It doesn't make any, it doesn't track. | ||
| Why would Russia do this? | ||
| I mean, it is very comparable to Obama saying, my red line is chemical weapons. | ||
| If Assad ever uses chemical weapons, America will invade. | ||
| And then Assad, despite winning the war, decides to drop barrel bombs full of potassium cyanide on his own people. | ||
| It's just, it's complete BS. | ||
| Complete nonsense, an obvious false flag that, in that case, has since been proven by the UN chemical weapons inspector, there were no chemical weapons that ever existed there, least of all ones launched by Bashir al-Assad. | ||
| It's the exact same thing here. | ||
| The one thing Russia can't do is bomb a NATO country. | ||
| And that's the one thing they do on the eve of the speech by Ursula Vanderleyen about how the EU needs to be prepared for war with Russia. | ||
| They happen to fly 19 drones over Poland, none of them armed, all of them reconnaissance, and they happen to fly kind of out of the Ukrainian airspace if you really look at it, but don't look too much into that. | ||
| Completely absurd. | ||
| Especially absurd since they've already tried this multiple times already. | ||
| The story from HungarianConservative.com: Poland's ex-president Duda exposes how Ukraine tries to pull allies into war. | ||
| This just happens to have been published three days ago, for five days ago at this point, September 5th. | ||
| Poland's former president, Andres Duja, has claimed that Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky attempted to pressure Warsaw into blaming Russia for the 2022 perwado missile strike, calling it an effort to pull Poland directly into the war. | ||
| In an effort, or in an interview rather, with the Polish outfit Do Rezki, Duda said Ukraine had sought to involve other nations in the fighting since the outset of the conflict, stressing it was in Kiev's interest to secure allies willing to confront Moscow. | ||
| He referred to the incident of the 15th of November 2022 when a missile struck the Polish village of Prezhwodo near the Ukrainian border, killing two farmers. | ||
| According to Duda, Zelensky's insistence that the missile was Russian amounted to pressure on Poland to confirm Moscow's responsibility, something Duda interpreted as an attempt to draw his country into the conflict. | ||
| So five days ago, the former president of Poland blew the whistle, admitted that Volodymyr Zelensky pressured him to blame the missile attack on Russia to invoke Article 5 to bring NATO into the war with Russia, despite knowing it was a Ukrainian missile the entire time. | ||
| And that might have worked except for the miraculous event that an independent reporter happened to be on the scene, happened to take a picture of the missile, happened to post it online where it spread, where people saw this wasn't a Russian missile. | ||
| If he hadn't been the first on the scene, if they'd had a government agent there first and could have covered it up and could have reported, yep, we got the missile pieces and they're definitely Russian, 100%. | ||
| You know, here they are, and they'll present a Russian missile as if that was the one that landed, we'd be in World War III right now. | ||
| I mean, how many events in recent history has it been like that? | ||
| Like the one guy who happened to capture the video, wasn't he a Polish guy? | ||
| Wasn't it a Polish guy that captured the video of throwing Hillary Clinton into the van like a sack of potatoes? | ||
| Like there are these things that, by all rights, nobody should know about. | ||
| We should not know that that missile came from Ukraine. | ||
| We should not have ever known that Hillary Clinton was deeply unhealthy and had to be thrown around like a sack of potatoes. | ||
| But it just so happens that Polish independent news reporters just happen to be on the scene of these incredible events. | ||
| I don't know what it is, but humanity owes a debt of gratitude to the Polish independent journalists out there. | ||
| So I mean, this is bombshell. | ||
| This is bombshell stuff. | ||
| No pun intended. | ||
| The president of Poland has admitted that Zelensky pressured him to say the missile was from Russia to invoke Article 5. | ||
| Try to get NATO into direct conflict with Russia to start World War III on a false flag. | ||
| And we only avoided it because an independent news reporter was there on the scene to take a picture. | ||
| Really incredible stuff. | ||
| And admitted here now, what we've known the entire time, but pretty interesting that he gives this interview days before they literally try to do it again. | ||
| Exactly the same thing with drones this time instead of a missile. | ||
| Europe is obviously wanting to go to war. | ||
| Again, we've talked about this. | ||
| It is actually impossible for them to do it. | ||
| They don't have the armies. | ||
| They don't have the equipment. | ||
| They don't have the industry to create the equipment to arm the armies that don't exist. | ||
| It doesn't make any sense. | ||
| It's not supposed to make any sense because these people don't want to win a war against Russia. | ||
| They want to start a war against Russia. | ||
| They don't want to defeat Russia and China. | ||
| They don't care about democracy. | ||
| They want to kill everyone in Europe as quietly as possible or as quickly as possible. | ||
| So they're trying to start the war. | ||
| They just aren't trying to win it. | ||
| Don't think they ever will win it. | ||
| From Hugh Anthony on X, members of the British Army are being threatened with losing their jobs or military jail time if they attend the September 13th rally. | ||
| So there's a big rally, I believe, with Tommy Robinson being held on the 13th of September in the UK. | ||
| A source within the British Army has reached out to me alleging that members are being threatened with having a book thrown at them, dishonorable discharge, if they attend the rally. | ||
| This order has come from a brigadier stating, attendant shows political allegiance and taking sides, despite it being obvious members of the army have taken a side by joining the army to defend and serve the country they love. | ||
| Due to the rank of the officer that has issued the order, insubordination of this issue can be punished by jail time in a military prison, leading to many members avoiding the rally over fear of being punished for saying, for the sake of your careers, don't go. | ||
| So the UK Army, in addition to telling its people to be prepared for deployment and we're going to have to go to war, et cetera, et cetera, are being threatened with jail time if they dare to attend the right-wing uprising that's taking place there. | ||
| So again, as the EU establishment, they are terrified of their own people. | ||
| And so they're trying to start a war to bring them back into line, to justify all of the outrageous measures that in many cases they're already implementing, but that they really want to accelerate against their own people. | ||
| Again, from a Polish user here, holy crap, former president of Poland Duda has revealed during an interview that Zelensky put pressure on him to immediately declare that the missile that fell on Polish territory a few years ago was Russian. | ||
| Juda said he saw it as an attempt by Ukraine to drag Poland into war with Russia. | ||
| So again, like nearly miraculous that this interview comes out just like days before they do exactly the same thing again. | ||
| And then this was, this is the thing where I'm like, am I crazy? | ||
| So somebody on August 26th, 6th says Ukrainian attack drone crashes in Estonia. | ||
| A Ukrainian strike drone crashed in Estonia, ERR reported, citing the country's security police. | ||
| According to the agency, the drone was most likely aimed at targets inside Russia, but was thrown off course by Russian GPS jamming, which I am. | ||
| I mean, Estonia is aligned with Russia, right? | ||
| They're very much sort of a Russian puppet state, if I'm not mistaken. | ||
| So this would seem to be Ukraine sort of going after Russia's allies a little bit somehow. | ||
| But then somebody else commented under that, where is the crowd who a couple days ago, when a Russian drone crashed in Poland, were asking for Article 5? | ||
| This was from August 26, 2025. | ||
| So I'm like, yeah, I remember, like a few days ago, I remember this. | ||
| There's like a weird sort of Groundhog's Day thing going on. | ||
| I don't know what it is, but I wake up to the news story about Russian drones crashing in Poland, and I'm like, wait, this happened three days ago. | ||
| It's like Twilight Zone stuff going on. | ||
| And yeah, it did. | ||
| It happened a few days ago where on like August 20th or so, they said they downed another Russian drone and we're talking about invoking Article 5 from that. | ||
| Apparently that didn't get enough attention. | ||
| So then they had to do it again. | ||
| Unless you believe that Vladimir Putin is the stupidest person in the world and doing the one thing that would guarantee NATO gets drawn into the conflict. | ||
| So I don't believe it. | ||
| I think we've probably said enough about that. | ||
| But just so you're aware, and by the way, this is sort of the overall trend that I'm noticing. | ||
| And I hope we all see this too. | ||
| Uprisings in England, uprisings in France, massive protests all over the world, uprisings in Australia, uprisings in New Zealand. | ||
| America is at the boiling point when it comes to racial relations. | ||
| Everything is sort of bubbling over. | ||
| Trump and Putin are on the cusp of peace in Ukraine. | ||
| Israel is rapidly losing support. | ||
| Things are falling through their fingers, and they're trying to tighten their grasp and they're trying to get something big going right now, distract everybody. | ||
| Like I said at the beginning of this show, it reminds me of 2019. | ||
| It reminds me of the yellow vest and the Hong Kong protests and the farmers protest all starting to bubble up in 2019. | ||
| It looked like we were on the cusp of something huge and then they hit us with COVID and the whole world locks down. | ||
| Expect something of that level to happen very soon. | ||
| I think the only way they get away with a false flag is by going as big as possible at this point. | ||
| I don't think a plane crashing into a tower is going to get people to go to war. | ||
| I don't think drones falling into Polish territory is going to get people into war. | ||
| I don't think a CIA wind-up toy shooting up a black church is going to be enough to drive us over the edge. | ||
| I think it's going to be like a dirty nuke. | ||
| I think it's going to be maybe an aircraft carrier going down completely, losing all hands on board. | ||
| Like it's going to have to be something monumental. | ||
| They sort of already used up their credit with COVID. | ||
| I don't know if they can do it with another illness, another disease. | ||
| I think they've played that hand. | ||
| And I think they may be waiting a few years to unleash that again. | ||
| Although maybe, you know, all the systems are in place. | ||
| That's definitely an option for them. | ||
| In fact, that seems to be their plan. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 18 here. | ||
| This is Ursula Vanderland, who later today will give the State of the Union address to the EU, where she'll talk about EU militarization because now saving the earth from the existential threat of climate change, which before superseded all other concerns because it's all of life on earth. | ||
| How could anything be more important to this? | ||
| Well, now starting a war with Russia is more important to this. | ||
| And the economic or rather environmental effects of a war, don't worry about that. | ||
| Don't worry. | ||
| It'll be fine. | ||
| I mean, we're going to kill so many people. | ||
| It'll be, we'll be in the positive at the end of it. | ||
| Because as we know, people are what caused climate change. | ||
| So if you want to fight climate change, killing millions of people is actually a brilliant move. | ||
| Let's go to clip 18 here. | ||
| Ursula van der Leyen, while simultaneously talking about starting a war, is also warning with big fat quotation marks around it of a new disease outbreak similar to COVID. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| We are on the brink, if not even at the start, of another global health crisis. | ||
| And as a medical doctor by training, I'm appalled by the disinformation that threatens global progress on everything from measles to polio. | ||
| And this is why today I can announce that the European Union will head a new global health resilience initiative. | ||
| You can hear the people there just are booing her. | ||
| They're just like, you're not doing this to us again. | ||
| It's not going to happen. | ||
| But by the way, I just sort of during the break there, I thought I'd go click around her Wikipedia here. | ||
| Just see what I could find, of course. | ||
| You know, we know that she is an elite, a descendant of the nobles in Europe. | ||
| Of course, she's married to Heiko von der Leyen. | ||
| Now, interestingly, both of these people have very prominent positions in, you know, healthcare. | ||
| Yeah, they both work for a giant big pharmaceutical organization. | ||
| So, you know, maybe that might be something worth looking into. | ||
| But, you know, hey, hey, I'd rather get the cold than go to World War III. | ||
| So do your worst, I guess. | ||
| But just so you know, everything's heating up. | ||
| The elite are watching their positions of authority become increasingly untenable. | ||
| And so they are ready and willing to start World War III or, you know, launch another COVID pandemic in order to keep you, the people, under their thumbs. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| Again, Polish media have released several pictures of the Gerbera drones that crashed or were shot down in Poland. | ||
| Gerbera drones are not armed. | ||
| They're used for reconnaissance or as fake targets to air defense fire at them. | ||
| Wonder how they ended up in Poland, accident or EW. | ||
| I mean, it could be as simple as, I mean, y'all know that like five years ago, maybe even more, Iran hacked a U.S. drone and landed it on their own airfield, right? | ||
| Kind of thing about drones. | ||
| There's no pilot. | ||
| You can kind of direct them where to go if you can hack into them. | ||
| So if Russian drones end up in Polish airspace, my first question would be: were they hacked to do that? | ||
| Or was that on purpose? | ||
| And if it was on purpose, what would be the point of that? | ||
| I guess what they're saying is it's reconnaissance because Putin is about to invade Poland, which, hey, if he invades Poland, then we'll talk, all right? | ||
| Once he invades Poland, then we'll talk. | ||
| But maybe we should also look in the past about wars started on behalf of Poland and really question whether that's something we want to do or not. | ||
| Now, since we're on the topic of fake diseases, fake pandemics, created and then weaponized by the powers that be to enslave humanity, let's go to some of these videos from the hearings yesterday. | ||
| Like I said, I could have just been playing these videos the entire show, and I encourage you to go watch them and like find your favorite one and share it to your friends. | ||
| Maybe that's what you should do because there's so much of this. | ||
| It's like almost overwhelming. | ||
| And every single one of these videos is worth long attention. | ||
| Let me find a really good one because we got some really good ones. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 29 here. | ||
| This has been a big one throughout this. | ||
| This is Dr. Toby Rogers talking about the development of autism in this country. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| An estimated 115,000 children develop autism every year in the United States. | ||
| That means that 315 children develop autism every day in the U.S. Now, if Dr. Sally Ozanoff's work is correct, and she's at UC Davis, she shows that 88% of autism cases are characterized by regression. | ||
| That means that, so if she's right about that, and I think she is, that means that 277 children regress into autism every day in the United States. | ||
| Now, regression suggests an acute toxic exposure, not genetics, not better awareness, an acute toxic exposure, which means that most cases of autism are preventable. | ||
| Autism is not a medical or scientific mystery. | ||
| We know beyond a reasonable doubt that toxicants, mostly from vaccines and about a dozen additional toxicants, are causing autism. | ||
| If we repeal the 1980 Baidole Act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and the 2005 PrEP Act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you, Dr. Rogers. | ||
| That guy was awesome, Dr. Rogers, about autism. | ||
| He also got into COVID quite a bit. | ||
| There's another guy that was really good, Aaron Siri. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 19 here. | ||
| Well, we just don't have, we don't quite have time for that. | ||
| Tell you what, in the first five minutes of the next hour, I'll play a longer clip of Siri. | ||
| Let's go now to clip 28. | ||
| The problem is all these clips are so long. | ||
| Let's go to clip 25. | ||
| Let's go to clip 25. | ||
| Here's a little example of just the humiliation that Democrats were subjected to yesterday. | ||
| Mr. Siri, we've been talking about medical issues. | ||
| You're not a medical doctor, are you? | ||
| No, sir. | ||
| And you're not an immunologist or biologist or any kind of vaccinologist. | ||
| No, but I depose them regularly, including the world's leading ones with regards to vaccines. | ||
| And I have to make my claims based on actual evidence when I go to court with regards to vaccines. | ||
| I don't get to line titles. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Nailed him. | ||
| Okay, let's go to 31 now. | ||
| 31. | ||
| In some of your Twitter posts, you said, and I'm quoting, you people are all going to spend eternity in hell. | ||
| Nuremberg II first, then hell based. | ||
| What did you mean by that? | ||
| I'll tell you, Richard. | ||
| Thank you for the question, Senator. | ||
| I believe that we are in the midst of one of the greatest crimes in human history. | ||
| We have a product being injected into children 70 plus times over the course of their development that's never been tested against a proper saline placebo. | ||
| Over that course of that time period, chronic illness in this country has gone from 10% of children having one or more chronic conditions to now more than 50% of children having one or more chronic conditions. | ||
| Secretary Kennedy in the hearing that was last week said that the latest data from the CDC says that 76% of Americans now have one or more chronic conditions. | ||
| And I believe that lots of these chronic conditions stem from iatogenic injury. | ||
| We have 3 million children with autism. | ||
| Back in 1970, the rate was so low that it was essentially zero. | ||
| I'm outraged by that. | ||
| And I think every person in this room should be outraged by that. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Again, just incredible testimony from these guys. | ||
| We'll show you one by Siri on the other side. | ||
| Siri is the guy's last name, Aaron Siri. | ||
| Just incredible stuff. | ||
| Massive victories in the front of healthcare and destroying the pharmaceutical industry's control of this country. | ||
| Massive victory on that front. | ||
| On the other side, stay with us. | ||
| I was all mixed up in my, on what time it is. | ||
| For some reason, I was saying we were about to start the 10 o'clock hours, which was what I was saying. | ||
| I'll play that video in the next five minutes. | ||
| So I'll play that video in the first five minutes of the next hour. | ||
| Apologies. | ||
| We have a lot to cover. | ||
| Still, though, and there's some interesting developments going on in Nepal. | ||
| But as I'm trying to look into it and research it, I've noticed that there's a, I think they're changing things in Google. | ||
| I think they figured out one of our more useful tools and they're trying to destroy it. | ||
| At least it stopped working for me. | ||
| So one thing I really like to do, because the way that, so after 2016, every major big tech company, social media company, and Google and things like that, I mean, they change their algorithms and they change the way that information is delivered. | ||
| That's when they did things like put up the banners saying, oh, it looks like results are changing quickly. | ||
| Maybe check back later, right? | ||
| So they can, and trusted sources being put up to the top. | ||
| They completely interfered in their algorithm. | ||
| And one of the things they did is they made breaking news from mainstream sources always show up first. | ||
| And in a lot of cases, that's all you can really find. | ||
| And they did it with YouTube. | ||
| They do it with Google, which is very annoying because a lot of times a story breaks, but there's a whole bunch of background to it, but you can't find the background anymore because if you search that topic, the only thing that comes up are the stories about what happened that day. | ||
| And you can't find any of the old information, or at least it's buried or it's very, very difficult to search. | ||
| So the trick I do, the tool I use, is on Google News, on the Google search bar, you go to the news tab, and you can do custom range. | ||
| And so, for example, drones fall in Poland today. | ||
| If you try to search drones in Poland, that's all you're going to find. | ||
| Stories about what happened today, responses, what happened today. | ||
| But I'm looking up, but I'm like, wait, didn't this happen last week? | ||
| And so it's like impossible for me to find an article about the drones last week because they don't show up. | ||
| They're all pushed out in favor of the breaking news that's happening right now. | ||
| And so I go in and I go, okay, I set a date range. | ||
| And I go, then tell me, you know, I'm going to search Polish drones from August 1st to September 5th, 2025. | ||
| So I just exclude anything from the last two days, three days, whatever. | ||
| And then I get the search results. | ||
| And that's been very useful. | ||
| It's very convenient. | ||
| I tried to do it just now and it's not working. | ||
| And they're sort of always tweaking this stuff. | ||
| The drop-down menus always look a little bit different. | ||
| Where to click, the sort by date range is always, it's like now it's under tools. | ||
| Actually, now it's under more. | ||
| They move it around and they kind of mix it up. | ||
| But I'm trying to see what led up to what happened in Nepal. | ||
| The excuse that's or the reasoning they're laying out now is these are Gen Z protests. | ||
| They're calling them the Gen Z protests against a ban on social media. | ||
| Social media was banned, or there was an age restriction, and people rose up over this. | ||
| Now, to me, I'm like, this is not adequate to explain what I'm seeing. | ||
| Maybe that was the final straw on the camel's back, but like, and maybe that is good. | ||
| Maybe this is just like you took TikTok away from your toddler and now they're burning the house down. | ||
| I mean, maybe that's all that happened, but I imagine some more stuff went on. | ||
| And again, it's just something that I find to be good practice in general. | ||
| When something breaks, go, okay, but what were they saying about this yesterday? | ||
| Okay, but what the day before and the day before that, what was leading up to this that I need to know about? | ||
| And so I go on Google News. | ||
| I do this tactic. | ||
| I search Nepal on the news for August 1st through September 7th, 2025. | ||
| And yet, all of the responses are from two days ago, the 8th, or from yesterday, the 9th, they're all about the Gen Z protest, which I set the date range to exclude. | ||
| So Google, I think, is messing with this stuff. | ||
| Or it may be that these articles were first posted on the 7th, but then they keep getting updated, but they're still backdated to the 7th. | ||
| I don't know what it is, but I think Google is messing with their news results and it's making it more difficult to actually go back and look at the history of events. | ||
| Every single result is from two days ago. | ||
| I set the date to end four days ago. | ||
| And yet every single response is from two days ago, and it's all about the protest. | ||
| I want to know about the lead up to the protests. | ||
| I want to know what they were saying right before the protests break out. | ||
| And yet, I cannot find that on Google now. | ||
| So I want to talk about Nepal, and I will, and we'll get into it because it's been crazy. | ||
| And it's, you know, like I said, this is what immediately preceded COVID. | ||
| The very, very similar images out of Brazil. | ||
| You had very, very similar images out of Hong Kong. | ||
| You had very, very similar images out of Ecuador and other places in South America where similar level uprisings were all happening, all rising to a fever pitch in 2019, right before COVID was launched. | ||
| So while it may seem like Nepal is unrelated to, you know, the protest in Australia or the protest against the migrant centers in the UK, there's a global energy resonating right now. | ||
| And all of these things are, I think, deeply intertwined. | ||
| So what we know about this is this is the thing that the powers that be are doing everything they're capable to prevent. | ||
| You want to see what an insurrection looks like. | ||
| You want to see what, you know, January 6th looks like in the Democrats' mind. | ||
| It's this. | ||
| Now, the people in Nepal don't have guns. | ||
| They didn't use guns to do this. | ||
| Guns might have been useful. | ||
| But at the end of the day, there's only so many of them and there's a whole hell of a lot of us. | ||
| So you reach that critical mass. | ||
| You reach that Inflection point in your population getting just mad enough, and things start to burn, and the illusion of their control and power and authority comes crumbling down. | ||
| We saw some almost like this go on in South Korea not too long ago. | ||
| Things are reaching a fever pitch worldwide, which is good in one hand. | ||
| On the other hand, it makes me very concerned about what the powers that be will do since they don't want to be, you know, dragged out of their bed in the middle of the night, which is what has happened to some of the leadership of Nepal. | ||
| CNN has a story: a parliament in flames, a league or toppled. | ||
| Nepal's Gen Z protesters ask, what comes next? | ||
| And the images out of this are just incredible. | ||
| The burning buildings, you know, with high-def 4K drone footage capturing it. | ||
| What began as a Gen Z-led social media movement against the lavish lifestyle of Nepo kids led to the ousting of a prime minister and the deadliest social unrest Nepal has seen in years. | ||
| Plumes of dark smoke towered above soldiers enforcing a curfew on the quiet streets of Kathmandu Wednesday morning as rumors swirled about a possible meeting, possible meeting between the leaderless Gen Z movement, the army, and the president. | ||
| An uneasy calm after two nights of chaos that saw tens of thousands of people pour into the streets to vent their fury, setting fire to parliament and the Supreme Court, key symbols of the state, and clashing with government forces sent to keep them under control. | ||
| The unrest started early September when a group of young Nepalese, fed up with seeing politicians' children posting about their designer handbags and luxury travel while most people struggled to make ends meet, organized a peaceful protest. | ||
| Anger had been growing for years about the country's worsting youth unemployment crisis and lack of economic opportunities, exacerbated by what many viewed as growing disparity between the country's elite and the regular people. | ||
| Word quickly spread in the Himalayan country of 30 million. | ||
| Then a government ban last week on more than two dozen social media platforms, including Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp, added fuel to the fire. | ||
| The buildup of frustration is what led to the movement, Suresh Sherethra, who attended the protest, told CNN describing the social media ban as the last straw. | ||
| That's what I was thinking. | ||
| The unemployment rate for youth aged 15 to 24 in Nepal was 28.8% or 20.8% in 2024, according to the World Bank, forcing many young people to move abroad to find work. | ||
| More than a third of Nepal's GDP comes from personal remittances, according to the World Bank, a number that has steadily risen over the last three decades. | ||
| On Monday morning, thousands of young people, including many dressed in school uniforms, gathered at Matagar Mandala, a monument at the heart of Kathmandu near the federal parliament building. | ||
| The protest quickly spiraled out of control when some of the protesters surged towards the parliament building and began to climb up the gate, clashing with police. | ||
| Police used live ammunition, water cannons, and tear gas against the protesters, according to the Reuters news agency. | ||
| Nearly 19 people were killed and hundreds wounded in the clashes Monday, according to Nepali authorities. | ||
| We all felt very hopeless and helpless at that point, Sherethra said. | ||
| And so it continues to grow. | ||
| Gen Z demanded accountability and fair investigations for this corruption. | ||
| The luxury lifestyle of this, all these corrupted politicians, kids, said Shri Gurung, who attended the protest after seeing reports that young people were being killed. | ||
| And it has escalated, and there's videos of the protesters storming not only into government buildings, but into the personal palaces of some of the leadership there in Nepal. | ||
| And I've even seen videos of them that were reportedly beating up the prime minister's wife, like they're in the prime minister's house. | ||
| I think maybe the wife has been killed as far as I remember. | ||
| Like, this is a major movement. | ||
| And it's interesting because it happened without guns, right? | ||
| It happened without social media. | ||
| Isn't that interesting, right? | ||
| Right? | ||
| They banned social media. | ||
| They banned WhatsApp. | ||
| So this is sort of like the ultimate expression of the Streisand effect, where they go, man, people are mad and they're expressing their anger on social media and that anger is inspiring other people to be angry. | ||
| Let's shut down social media, thinking that that's going to stop the fire from spreading. | ||
| They only threw gasoline on it. | ||
| But, you know, they made the calculation and they said, okay, you know, banning social media is going to make people mad, but it's also going to stop people from talking to each other and it's going to stop people from organizing. | ||
| So they were trying to cut off the protest before it began by eliminating their ability to communicate with each other and organize a protest movement. | ||
| That didn't really work, did it? | ||
| No, in fact, banning WhatsApp, banning Facebook, banning these communication networks just inspired people to be more angry, really stoked the fury. | ||
| And now the whole country is burning. | ||
| So I'd like to look into this more and get more details on this because my instinct is to throw in with the protesters. | ||
| My instinct is to see what's happening in Nepal and think, gosh, that looks fun. | ||
| Gosh, it looks like a rollicking good time to overthrow the corrupt, spoiled leadership that is allowing your country to descend into chaos and poverty. | ||
| But I need more details because these things are always a little more complicated than at first blush. | ||
| And for all I know, there's a bunch of communist socialists just causing trouble. | ||
| I don't really know. | ||
| I don't really know because Nepal, who pays that much attention to Nepal, to be honest with you. | ||
| Maybe we should. | ||
| But again, my instinct is to be like, hell yeah. | ||
| It's to be like, yeah, this is awesome. | ||
| This should be an inspiration. | ||
| And if nothing else, it's a reminder that the power of the elites is very illusory. | ||
| It's really not as powerful as they want you to think it is. | ||
| And as I've said a million, billion times, even when we talk about conspiracies, even when we talk about the worldwide powers that be just being able to pull off the most insane deceptions you can possibly imagine, they're still human beings. | ||
| They still have to contend with human will. | ||
| They do not have magical powers. | ||
| They don't have wands to wave to get people to do what they want. | ||
| They have to contend with human will. | ||
| And sometimes they miscalculate. | ||
| And sometimes human will breaks free from their control. | ||
| Sometimes it boils over and they lose control. | ||
| And the people take back what's theirs. | ||
| It can happen. | ||
| So again, without even getting into the details of what exactly is inspiring these protests, just knowing that the levers that these people think they can pull to squash a movement like this aren't as effective as they think. | ||
| They think they can censor everybody and everybody will just go home. | ||
| They think they can eliminate the mode of communication and nobody will know how to get in contact with one another. | ||
| They think that they can abuse you endlessly and that you have to take it. | ||
| And eventually, like the scene from A Bug's Life, eventually the cap comes off and all the seeds come spilling out of the bottle. | ||
| Eventually, the mass number of people not in power use that strength in numbers and shatter the illusion. | ||
| That being said, I also hesitate to totally throw my hat in the ring with the protesters because there has been some pretty severe violence. | ||
| And again, without knowing more about it, I can't exactly co-sign this. | ||
| Wife of ex-Nepal EPM burned alive. | ||
| Gen Z revolt in Gulf's country. | ||
| The wife of the former prime minister of Nepal, Jala Nath Connell, died Tuesday after she was burned alive when her home was set on fire amid violent anti-government protests in the country, regional media reported. | ||
| The Nepalese parliament building and the homes of the political leaders were torched in the unrest, which plunged the Himalayan state into full-blown crisis. | ||
| And I'm telling you right now, the story might not be on the top of headlines or on the front page of newspapers right now. | ||
| But if there's one story that the world elite are looking at, it's this one. | ||
| And one of the reasons I always bring up the designs of the elite to create immortality in one way or another, upload their consciousness to the cloud or, you know, age reversal technology. | ||
| One of the reasons I bring that up is because it doesn't just inform what they're doing in the bio-medical field. | ||
| It informs everything about them. | ||
| And understand that it's not just the ultimate fear of old age that they're scared of. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They. | |
| How do I put this? | ||
| The elite understand that they are walking a tightrope over a tank of sharks constantly. | ||
| And they know that their security, their protection, their aloofness, their elevation up and above and out of the rabble rousers in the crowd is a very tenuous, very delicate thing. | ||
| And it's hard to even talk about this because, again, how do you warn somebody without it sounding like a threat, right? | ||
| How do you warn somebody without it sounding like a threat? | ||
| I'm not threatening the powers that be, but I am letting them know. | ||
| And I don't have plans on doing anything. | ||
| I'm just, I'm letting them know this could happen to you. | ||
| And it probably will if you don't give Americans just bare minimum respect. | ||
| Bare minimum. | ||
| Bare minimum. | ||
| So I really hope powers that be right now in their private neighborhoods behind their locked gates. | ||
| I hope they're looking at what's happening in Nepal and asking themselves the question, is it worth it to try to hang on to power? | ||
| Is it really worth it? | ||
| I think if you ask the Nepalese government, if you could go back in time a week, would you ban WhatsApp? | ||
| Would you ban Facebook? | ||
| Or if you had a time machine and could go back a week, would you do things a little bit different? | ||
| Would you give a little bit more consideration to the people in your country? | ||
| Would you listen to their concerns rather than trying to silence them? | ||
| Would you allow them to air their grievances rather than censor them? | ||
| I hope the powers that be in America and Europe are looking at Nepal and going, we better make some changes. | ||
| We better give some ground here. | ||
| Because Those fences, those walls, those armed guards are not really as strong as you might think. | ||
| They're not really as untouchable as you like to feel. | ||
| I think they know that. | ||
| And I think they live in constant fear. | ||
| In fact, I know they live in constant fear. | ||
| In fact, I could go to a video from the Senate hearing. | ||
| I don't know how long it is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know if I'll be able to go to it. | |
| But some of the doctors at the Senate hearing yesterday are talking about waking up in a cold sweat, imagining a mob coming for them. | ||
| And that's the price these people pay for being evil. | ||
| It's why I go out of my way to just try as hard as possible to just never lie, never do anything underhanded because you just know that you just live forever with that feeling of like, I'm about to be exposed. | ||
| I'm about to be caught. | ||
| These people are like, they know what they've done. | ||
| What's the quote? | ||
| There's a quote from somebody saying, you know, if the people knew what we'd done, they'd string us up tomorrow. | ||
| There's some famous politician that said that somewhat recently. | ||
| And it's absolutely true. | ||
| And so they live in fear that like one day they'll lose control. | ||
| One day the pit bull they have on a leash will not listen to their orders and instead turn around and bite their throat out. | ||
| And what's happening in Nepal is exactly that. | ||
| I'm certainly not threatening anybody. | ||
| I certainly don't have any plans to do this. | ||
| I just hope that our elite in Western countries George H.W. Bush. | ||
| There you go. | ||
| If the American people knew what we'd done, they'd string us up from lampposts. | ||
| Well, he got away with it, unfortunately, but I'm just saying your options now to the elite are just like give the citizens of your country bare minimum respect and consideration. | ||
| Literally just stop actively trying to destroy them or become Nepal or have the illusion of your elevation shattered and be subject to the will of the mob. | ||
| Those really are the only options. | ||
| The only lesson they should not be learning is like, oh, wow, we better really clamp down. | ||
| We better really accelerate. | ||
| But you know that's what they're thinking. | ||
| You know that the powers of the B see this and they go, oh, gee, that could happen here. | ||
| We better really accelerate the program. | ||
| We better censor people even harder now because they're insane and because they don't know any other way. | ||
| But just look at Nepal. | ||
| Look at what they did. | ||
| They tried to censor it, thinking they would stop people from talking about their grievances. | ||
| They tried to shut down the communication networks so people couldn't organize a resistance. | ||
| It doesn't work. | ||
| And if the Nepalese government could go back in time, they wouldn't say to themselves, hey, you better be more harsh. | ||
| They'd say, hey, stop trying to crush them. | ||
| Stop trying to silence them. | ||
| You need to listen to them. | ||
| You need to make some movement in their direction. | ||
| You actually compromise with them a little bit or they're going to kill you in your bed. | ||
| OK, so so learn this lesson, leaders of the West. | ||
| Because we've learned, because frankly, we've learned the lesson too. | ||
| Because I think if a lot of us could go back in time and thank God we elected Donald Trump and he pardoned the people from January 6th, but like, you know, you treated it like it was a violent insurrection. | ||
| Next time, we're not dumb enough now to think that we can go protest, you know, at the Capitol and actually be heard and be listened to and be respected and participate in this time-honored tradition of peaceful protest. | ||
| Like, we thought that that's what we were doing and we thought that we'd get some consideration back from the government. | ||
| As we show, there's a million people show up in Washington, D.C. America actually cares about this. | ||
| And we all showed up with no guns. | ||
| We all showed up with no nothing. | ||
| Just there to express ourselves and wave some signs. | ||
| And then we got treated like insurrectionists. | ||
| So, you know, that ain't happening again. | ||
| Nobody's going out to peacefully protest in the delusion that, you know, the government will listen to them. | ||
| So you've made peaceful protest impossible. | ||
| And now you're pushing people to the brink of their ability to maintain composure. | ||
| So I hope this is a lesson for both sides, what's happening in Nepal. | ||
| And while I disavow the violence that's happening, it certainly is an important lesson to learn these days. | ||
| Now, we'll be back on the other side with Stuart Rhodes, and we'll talk about everything going on in the country. | ||
| So we have a lot more videos to go to and a lot more stories to tell you. | ||
| We'll be following the Nepal events as they develop as well. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| We'll do a video from Aaron Seary on the other side during his Senate hearing. | ||
| To 2013, the Institute of Medicine was commissioned by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to review the entire body of existing scientific literature to assess the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule as a whole. | ||
| HHS paid the IOM to do that. | ||
| After the IOM engaged in that task with a panel of multidisciplinary scientists, it concluded, quote, the studies designed to examine the long-term effects of a cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted, have not been conducted, end quote. | ||
| That's the Institute of Medicine's finding after reviewing the entire body of scientific literature. | ||
| Meaning the IOM could not find studies comparing, as you would do to study the safety of a product, an exposed group, meaning kids that got vaccines, the childhood schedule, with unvaccinated children, kids who got no vaccines, which is what you would need to assess the safety of the schedule. | ||
| Lacking evidence to support safety, the best the IOM could conclude was, quote, there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe, end quote. | ||
| This, of course, also means the IOM cannot find evidence to conclude that the schedule is safe. | ||
| The IOM report did say it is, quote, possible to make the comparison, meaning through vaccinated, unvaccinated children, through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as the vaccine safety data link, end quote, which used to be housed at the CDC. | ||
| But to date, the government has still not conducted this comparison. | ||
| By the way, the CDC conducted, published a white paper in 2015 on how to do that study. | ||
| Has it been done? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Has it been published? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| In 2017, one of our clients, Senator Johnson said earlier, the Informed Consent Action Network, wanted to see this exact study of comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children. | ||
| As the trailer you just watched noted, Del Bigtree, ICANN's CEO, had met Dr. Marcus Zervis at one point, who was the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center. | ||
| And he agreed to meet and to potentially do the study. | ||
| He conducts clinical trials for vaccines, including for the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
| He's a validly pro-vaccine. | ||
| And when we met him, we argued that this was an opportunity to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier. | ||
| To our surprise, Dr. Zervis said he would conduct the study. | ||
| He recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians within Henry Ford to do so. | ||
| These were mainstream scientists who no doubt held orthodox views regarding vaccines. | ||
| In early 2020, I received a copy of the study. | ||
| It showed the results of the analysis comparing children enrolled in Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward who had no vaccines compared to those who had one or more vaccines. | ||
| This study was based on actual medical records. | ||
| Meaning, finally, a large vaccinated versus unvaccinated study using health data from a major United States health institution, something, as the IOM pointed out, never existed before. | ||
| The study began by explaining it set out to reduce vaccine hesitancy by assuring parents the CDC vaccine schedule is safe. | ||
| Instead, what these researchers found was that vaccinated children had 4.29 times the rate of asthma, 3.03 times the rate of atopic disease, 5.96 times the rate of autoimmune disease, and 5.53 times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included 3.28 times the rate of developmental delay and 4.47 times the rate of speech disorder. | ||
| All of these findings were statistically significant. | ||
| There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group, but zero in the unvaccinated group. | ||
| Hence, a rate could not be calculated, including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and ticks. | ||
| For example, there were 262 cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group, and there were none in the unvaccinated group. | ||
| In this study, there were around 16,000 kids in the vaccinated group, by the way, and around 2,000 in the unvaccinated group. | ||
| So the rate, of course, between those is important, and that's what the study compared. | ||
| These findings were troubling, including because these chronic health issues can be caused by immune system dysregulation, and vaccines can cause immune system dysregulation. | ||
| Citations for this are in my written submission. | ||
| Overall, the study found that after 10 years, 17% of the bombshell testimony he gave yesterday to the Senate. | ||
| We're here in studio with Stuart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers. | ||
| We'll be right back on the other side. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| Third hour is on. | ||
| Of course, don't be live in the InfoWars studio. | ||
| I'm in studio with the one and only Stuart Rhodes of the Oath Keepers. | ||
| You can support him by going to givesendgo.com slash G-A-F-5B. | ||
| That's givesendgo.com slash G-A-F-5B. | ||
| Not only is he still trying to get an actual pardon, you, of course, had your sentence commuted, but there's still some legal challenges to go there, and he needs your help raising funds for that. | ||
| You're also wanting to restart the Oath Keepers. | ||
| Very excited to talk to you about your intentions in that regard. | ||
| Welcome to the show, sir. | ||
| Good to be here, brother. | ||
| Good to have you here. | ||
| Tell us about what you're up to these days. | ||
| You're in town for an event, but then I understand you're going to Chicago next. | ||
| What's the plan for Stuart Rhodes in the future? | ||
| Yes, I'm speaking around Texas. | ||
| Tonight I'm speaking at the Liberty Tree Cafe or Liberty Tree Tavern in Elgin, Texas at 6.30. | ||
| Folks want to come out. | ||
| If you're in Texas within driving range, come on out and say hi. | ||
| See you some good music and I'll tell my story. | ||
| And then I'm speaking in Chicago on the 23rd of this month, actually. | ||
| So the original plan was to speak at a country club, but they got scared by leftist pressure and backed out and canceled for being used as a venue. | ||
| But we're looking for another venue. | ||
| You know, it's strange that that tactic still works so well with the left. | ||
| It does on some people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Isn't that weird? | ||
| Because, I mean, there was a lot. | ||
| Apparently it works on the country club set. | ||
| The people you wouldn't expect it to work against. | ||
| It somehow works against. | ||
| And it's like, you know, in the height of 2016, when everything was like hyper, you know, crazy, I could kind of understand how people could get the wrong. | ||
| But like the oathkeeper, Stuart Rhodes, you know, I know the people that you're hosting it with, they're just liberty-minded people. | ||
| So it's like, what are they even telling them to get them canceled, do you think? | ||
| Because it's like, you know, I guess you call them, we're going, you're hosting Nazis. | ||
| The people would go, well, I don't want to host Nazis, but like you guys are liberty, just like the come and take it liberty guys. | ||
| And yet. | ||
| Well, they say you're hosting a terrorist. | ||
| You're hosting an insurrection. | ||
| A convicted insurrectionist. | ||
| Don't forget, he wasn't pardoned. | ||
| He's only commuted. | ||
| So it really was up to something. | ||
| That's the standard line. | ||
| I didn't even think about that. | ||
| These dirtbags. | ||
| Well, it's very interesting that you're going to Chicago because, well, a lot of other people are going to Chicago. | ||
| The National Guard is being sent to Chicago, Operation Midway Blitz by the president. | ||
| What is your take on that? | ||
| I'm sort of in between. | ||
| I was okay with it in D.C. I don't like the National Guard being deployed on American streets, but American people have a right not to be beaten half to death on their walk home. | ||
| So what is your take on this as a libertarian? | ||
| Well, as a constitutionalist, I'll say this. | ||
| It's the National Guard is part of the militia, and the president's within his rights to call forth the militia. | ||
| He could call forth the National Guard and also the rest of us if he wanted to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections, or repel invasions. | ||
| And then the Insurrection Act goes further and says whenever any local or state officials fail to protect the rights of the American people and their rights cannot be protected in due course in the courts, the president can step in and use the National Guard as part of the militia or the military. | ||
| I think as a regionalist constitutionalist, I don't see a role domestically for the U.S. military. | ||
| I mean, obviously, repelling an invasion, but when it comes to internal policing, insurrection, executing the laws of the Union, it only mentions the militia in the Constitution. | ||
| So I think the squarest and most constitutional avenue is the National Guard or the rest of us being called up as the militia as well. | ||
| I think it's less, it's much more questionable to use the military on U.S. soil. | ||
| But the courts since the founding and with the Insurrection Act have said something different. | ||
| They've allowed it to happen. | ||
| So one thing's for sure, though, is that it's perfectly constitutional for him to use the National Guard. | ||
| When you have local officials who are failing to protect the rights of the American people and he's trying to execute federal law, like with ICE going in and arresting and deporting illegal aliens, I think it's within his rights. | ||
| Yeah, and if nothing else, it's about upholding people's belief in the law because it's not even necessarily that they're trying to stop the criminals victimizing innocent people. | ||
| It's also about stopping those innocent people from losing trust in the system and going, I'm not going to the cops for justice. | ||
| I'll get justice myself. | ||
| And that spiral. | ||
| I mean, if you don't police basic crime and people have to start standing up for themselves, they'll start making gangs. | ||
| I mean, it can very quickly or very slowly spiral out of control and just get worse and worse and worse. | ||
| So, I mean, this is really about maintaining just the legitimacy of the constitutional system, right? | ||
| Or the local court system. | ||
| Because I think we're getting to a point where, like, if a crime happens to me, I don't know if I'm going to go to the cops because I don't trust the courts. | ||
| I don't think they're going to get justice. | ||
| So I'll just go get it myself. | ||
| And like that, when that starts happening and creates a feedback loop, there's no retaining that, right? | ||
| So you're talking about a situation where the people feel like they have no recourse. | ||
| Any deliverance in the courts enough to do it themselves. | ||
| That's what happened in Mexico. | ||
| You had the auto-defense unit spring up because the cartels were getting away with murder literally and oppressing them. | ||
| They finally just had enough. | ||
| Then the Mexican government cracked down on the people who were organizing these civilian militias. | ||
| So yes, that's the problem is that in the end, it's going to come down to we, the people. | ||
| I prefer it to be done under President Trump's authority as the militia. | ||
| I believe that's what he should do. | ||
| That's the constitutional answer. | ||
| That's the safest place to put that trust is in the hands of the people themselves. | ||
| I don't want to see what the bad guys have planned for us, of course, is terminator world. | ||
| You know, robots and drones in the sky and all that kind of crap. | ||
| So they want less freedom for us and more concentrated power for themselves. | ||
| So I think President Trump has a window of opportunity to expand the reliance of the people themselves on themselves. | ||
| He could expand the militia right now. | ||
| He could call us all up as a militia. | ||
| And like I said before, he should call us all up and organize us all in our own counties across the country. | ||
| He can do that right now. | ||
| And he should do that right now. | ||
| That's the best solution long term. | ||
| Because otherwise, you're right. | ||
| If you have DAs who refuse to prosecute and they're part of a communist takeover of the United States and an internal coup, a slow-motion coup, ongoing coup, then yes, you're going to have a situation in the end where it's going to lead to civil war. | ||
| Yeah, that's exactly what it seems like. | ||
| And it seems like the left is being emboldened to a really dangerous degree. | ||
| I have all these videos, but I can't even play them because they curse too much. | ||
| But on TikTok, all the gangsters from Chicago are waving around their switches and going, oh, we're going to get some National Guard boys. | ||
| We're going to have guys on the roof sniping the soldiers. | ||
| And it's like, I hope not. | ||
| I hope you really don't try to do that because you're going to get crushed and it's going to get messy. | ||
| But as I'm seeing all these, I'm going to take a look at the people. | ||
| I think it's talking trash. | ||
| I think they're talking trash, but I think it's going to be different than D.C. Do you think it's going to be the same as because D.C., all we got was a bunch of leftist white people from Alexandria going and protesting on the weekend. | ||
| But it seems like most people in the bad neighborhoods in D.C. are like pretty thankful that law and order is being restored, at least from what I've seen. | ||
| I think Chicago seems like a little different kettle of fish. | ||
| What do you think is going to happen there? | ||
| I think it'll be the same. | ||
| Unless you have a false flag operation going on. | ||
| We have someone else firing on the troops from the rooftops and blaming it on the gangs. | ||
| That's one possibility. | ||
| But I think other than that, I think it's just blowing smoke, talking tough. | ||
| When the Humvees, the armored up Humvees arrive and the Bradley fighting vehicles, I think they're going to back off and just go quiet. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I hope. | ||
| I don't know, though, because it's like you seem to be assuming that the left has some sort of survival instinct. | ||
| Because when a Bradley tank showed up, you would think you would run away. | ||
| But we showed a video yesterday. | ||
| His National Guard member, he's probably six foot three, Kevlar Vest. | ||
| You can't see his face. | ||
| And there's some five foot tall, what looks like a middle school counselor getting in his face and pointing at him and shoving him. | ||
| And it's like, you people are suicidal. | ||
| What are you doing? | ||
| I mean, they don't have any survival instinct anymore. | ||
| That's the lefties. | ||
| I think the gangbangers do have a survival instinct. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Yeah, that's probably true. | ||
| You're probably right. | ||
| They pick the victims carefully. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| They don't carjack, you know, a lifted pickup truck full of rednecks. | ||
| Right, right, right. | ||
| So same with the National Guard. | ||
| My experience in prison, I think a lot of the guys, like a lot of the guys were there from inner city D.C., but also Philadelphia and some from Chicago, almost all of them respect the military and wish they had gone in the military. | ||
| So I think when the troops show up, I think it's going to be a different ballgame. | ||
| They're going to as long as they're as long as they don't feel like they're having their entire lives destroyed and taken over. | ||
| I think that it's going to just go quiet and stay out of the way for a while. | ||
| Well, I hope so. | ||
| Again, I just, it's like, you know, again, it's like I'm just begging the left, like, y'all, just put the police on the streets, you know, crack down on crime, or else Trump's going to have to do it. | ||
| Like, I don't want Trump to have to do this. | ||
| I don't want it to keep Swarling out of control. | ||
| So they got to do something. | ||
| Just do your bare minimum. | ||
| Do your job. | ||
| And none of this would be a good idea. | ||
| Well, they want this, though. | ||
| They want him to do this because they want to call him a dictator. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So, you know, they want to destroy our country. | ||
| They want to destroy our society. | ||
| They want to pit black against white. | ||
| They want to race war. | ||
| They want all of that stuff. | ||
| And so if Trump's going in there to cost stability, they're going to try to twist that into he's a dictator, of course. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But I think it's within his rights. | ||
| Of course, they screamed about the Pasta Camontatus Act. | ||
| So that prohibits military being used as law enforcement unless it's for the drug war. | ||
| That's one exception. | ||
| Or all the things listed in the Insurrection Act. | ||
| And that's why I think he's within his rights. | ||
| I think the courts in the end will back him up. | ||
| You might get some lower federal district court judge that'll say it's somehow unconstitutional and try to put an injunction in place, but then the Supreme Court will knock that down. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So they can't do the nation. | ||
| But his smartest tactic is lead with ICE, go in with ICE, lead with them, and also say, hey, look, we're cracking down on the killer fentanyl that's murdered millions of American people, or half a million now altogether. | ||
| Those are his two strongest weapons because one's a clear exception to the Postakami Tatus Act, and the other one is just obviously enforcing federal law, squarely within its rights under the Insurrection Act. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| It makes perfect sense. | ||
| And I want to go to a video now of Jesse Waters. | ||
| It's, let's see, how long is it? | ||
| I think it's only about two minutes or so. | ||
| But when you talk about the slow-motion coup going on, the way that our system is being overthrown, and you talk about, you know, a judge might think this is unconstitutional. | ||
| No, they know it's not, but they'll say it is. | ||
| Well, and the and the real question is: are they even judges and what are they even qualified for in that? | ||
| Have you seen this? | ||
| The fact that their judges haven't even graduated from law school as somebody who went to Yale school, I want to get your take on this, but Jesse Waters laid it out brilliantly, so I got to give him credit. | ||
| Clip number 12: DEI in our judges. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| This is Teresa Stokes, a Harris donor who doesn't even have a law degree, but just made a career criminal and a schizophrenic who beat his own sister when he was out on parole. | ||
| Pinky promised that he'd behave. | ||
| Ms. Stokes wasn't elected. | ||
| She was nominated by the clerk in Mecklenburg County. | ||
| The sitting clerk is Alyssa Chin Gary. | ||
| On her LinkedIn page, she calls herself a clerk and a DEI consultant and a racial equity organizer. | ||
| And her life mission? | ||
| Reparations. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We are here to honor them, to lift their names, and to continue the intergenerational work that we are required to do to eliminate structural racism. | |
| Ms. Stokes was nominated by Judge Carla Archie. | ||
| Judge Archie is friends with Eric Holder, Obama's wingman. | ||
| And Judge Archie isn't just any judge. | ||
| In 2019, she was the DEI champion of the year. | ||
| Is this starting to make sense? | ||
| Did a woman die because of DEI? | ||
| Just a couple months ago, a guy shot five people on New Year's, and Judge Archie sentenced them to a year and a half for shooting five people, a year and a half. | ||
| This is a DEI court, and they have blood on their hands. | ||
| And if the people in robes are on the same side as the bad guys, that's suicide. | ||
| Are you okay with the country committing judicial suicide? | ||
| I'm not. | ||
| DEI died when Kamala lost. | ||
| It's illegal. | ||
| And releasing felons with dozens of arrests for social justice is a crime against the country. | ||
| They've set up these dangerous DEI courts in cities nationwide, catching and releasing criminals to prey on innocent people. | ||
| These courts need to be systematically dismantled. | ||
| And that needs to happen immediately. | ||
| So I could not agree with him more. | ||
| There has to be some movement. | ||
| I guess it can come from the Fed. | ||
| Maybe it can come from the bottom up. | ||
| I mean, what do you think we do about this? | ||
| Because we've got people who never went to law school presiding over two lawyers who did have to go to law school. | ||
| And they're the ultimate authority. | ||
| And I've often said on this show, you know, I almost refuse to call them judges. | ||
| They're activists in judge robes. | ||
| And we've seen time and time again, people go from being, you know, they work for a nonprofit, you know, immigrant, you know, a place that brings in immigrants for 20 years, and then suddenly they're a judge. | ||
| It's like, these are just activists that Obama or Biden put in robes, and now they have authority to do this. | ||
| Like Judge Mehta in my case. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| He was never a judge prior to that. | ||
| He was a defense attorney. | ||
| At least he had a law degree, right? | ||
| Yes, he did. | ||
| I mean, in this case, these people don't even have law degrees. | ||
| So I'm guessing magistrate in that state is probably the same as a constable here. | ||
| You don't have to be a lawyer to be a constable in Texas, for example. | ||
| You can sit on lower court cases. | ||
| But are constables deciding? | ||
| Yes, they handle misdemeanor cases. | ||
| I didn't know that. | ||
| I thought constables were just sort of like local, like smaller scale sheriffs. | ||
| No, they handle misdemeanor cases. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Because I know they're elected. | ||
| There's some. | ||
| I mean, Justice the Peace. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| Justice the Peace. | ||
| Oh, Justice of Peace. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| That makes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Okay. | ||
| So Justice the Peace doesn't have to have a law degree. | ||
| I'm guessing magistrate over there is probably the same thing. | ||
| So here's what it says. | ||
| This is sort of the graphic that's gone viral. | ||
| Magistrate judges releasing violent criminals without bail often aren't even lawyers. | ||
| Judge Teresa Stokes, the magistrate judge who released the violent criminal that murdered a Ukrainian refugee, never passed the bar and there was no evidence she completed law school. | ||
| Magistrates in North Carolina, South Carolina, West Virginia, Virginia, Texas, and Arizona are not required to be lawyers to serve. | ||
| So again, I just, Jesse Waters asked it there, how did it even get to this point? | ||
| And what do we need to do? | ||
| But even besides the ones who went to law school, like the ones good friends with Eric Holder, same thing. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Total, DEI champion. | ||
| Right. | ||
| We're not saying going to law school therefore makes you capable of being a judge. | ||
| Certainly not. | ||
| Not at all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| So, so, I mean, what do we, again, what do we do about this? | ||
| Because I mean, if something like this were to happen to me or my family, if a family member of mine were to die because some judge got a promissory note from a repeat criminal and he went on to murder, I mean, maybe I shouldn't say what I would do, but it's like, how much longer can this go on with people trusting and believing and adhering to the system because it's this dysfunctional? | ||
| They shouldn't trust it. | ||
| Wherever the left's in power, you're no longer living in America. | ||
| You're now living in their communist utopia, which is just going to be like a hellscape. | ||
| So what you have to do is separate yourself from it. | ||
| Don't live there. | ||
| And you shouldn't be on public transportation. | ||
| I watched the video of that girl and it's just not paying attention to her surroundings at all, not even clued into the risk of the guy behind her. | ||
| She turned out to be a Black Lives Matter supporter. | ||
| So in her head, she's already been brainwashed to believe that anything that's said about black on white crime or black on black crime or anything like that is all right-wing propaganda. | ||
| So she just didn't even see the threat. | ||
| Didn't even register in her mind as a possible threat. | ||
| She just sat down. | ||
| So I think she was killed by DEI. | ||
| So on a train like that, my back's to the, I'm either in the back seat or my back's to the glass, and I'm watching everyone and watching all the males in particular. | ||
| And yeah, I'm watching the black males in particular also because they're the highest risk of threat. | ||
| This is the way it is. | ||
| 13% of our population commits half the crime, at least half the violent crime. | ||
| So it's just the way it is. | ||
| I saw that in prison. | ||
| It's a broken culture. | ||
| I'm not saying all black people are like that. | ||
| One of my favorite guys in my prison was Rob the Marine, who was a workout partner, a driver of the white Marine, like white Marine and a black Marine with the two PE instructors for working out. | ||
| Great guy. | ||
| He didn't like hanging out with the other black guys because he didn't like that culture. | ||
| It's not the culture he was raised in. | ||
| He didn't like the inner city black culture. | ||
| He saw it as dysfunctional and broken. | ||
| And he's right. | ||
| It is. | ||
| And I talked to some of the gangbangers. | ||
| One guy from Jamaica asked me, he's like, what do you think about all the black on black crime? | ||
| I said, man, I think it's a perversion of the warrior culture. | ||
| I said, gangs are a perversion of the warrior culture. | ||
| You're not protecting your communities or providing for them. | ||
| You're destroying them and tearing them apart. | ||
| And you're killing innocent women and children in the crossfire. | ||
| And he said, yeah, you know, you're right. | ||
| FSA, you're right about that. | ||
| Because he respected me because I was a military veteran and he wanted to hear my opinion. | ||
| That's what I told him. | ||
| I said, you guys should be taking, I think, take all of them and put them in the friggin Army and Marine Corps and the Navy. | ||
| If they're a flight risk, put them on an aircraft carrier or a submarine out in the middle of the ocean and give them a positive warrior culture to break that cycle. | ||
| That's what we should be done with all these kids that wind up in juvenile hall and then going to prison. | ||
| Put them in the military and squirm them away. | ||
| That's the way to break it. | ||
| So the military is the answer, not necessarily on the streets program. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| But put them in the military. | ||
| That's really interesting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So what if, like, what if, you know, when the National Guard goes to Chicago, they open up like a camp where, you know, if you're a teenager, you can come and sign up and get trained and maybe get paid $100 a week or something to test. | ||
| That's not a bad idea. | ||
| Do some drills, yeah. | ||
| But if they get in trouble, I really believe that they should just sentence them to, you know, four years in the Marine Corps or the Army or the Navy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it's got to – everybody – In lieu of prison. | |
| Exactly. | ||
| Sorry to interrupt, but I just, because I know where you're going, I completely agree because it's so absurd that we put people in a concrete fart box for 15 years and expect them to come out fixed. | ||
| Like, it just makes no sense. | ||
| They're in gangs in prison. | ||
| They're doing dope in prison. | ||
| The drugs are everywhere. | ||
| You can't stop them from getting high. | ||
| They continue on the same lifestyle. | ||
| They're extorting other people, other inmates. | ||
| They're running whatever their little game is, whatever the hustle is. | ||
| They're stealing food or stealing whatever they can and then selling it. | ||
| That's what they're doing in prison. | ||
| And when they get back out, they're right back to what they used to do. | ||
| It's so interesting. | ||
| You call it a perversion of warrior culture. | ||
| It is. | ||
| It is. | ||
| It absolutely is. | ||
| And I have a joke. | ||
| It's not very nice, but it is true. | ||
| I say, you know, I went to public school. | ||
| Public school, it won't teach you how to do your taxes. | ||
| It won't teach you how to start a business. | ||
| But it will teach you that black people travel in groups and adhere to an archaic form of honor culture. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| And that's really what it is. | ||
| The joke is, you know, if you want to understand black culture, read The Three Musketeers. | ||
| Because it's this, the first chapter of the Three Musketeers, the main character, D'Artagnan, starts a lifelong vendetta because somebody insults his horse. | ||
| And you talk about in the black community, somebody scuffs your shoes and that becomes a shooting offense. | ||
| There's a form of honor culture. | ||
| There's that in the white culture, too. | ||
| In prison, there's different cars. | ||
| There's the black car, there's the white car, there's a Hispanic car, then there's different gangs in different cities, different towns. | ||
| They'll have their own table. | ||
| But in the child hall, it's broken down by race. | ||
| Everyone sits apart. | ||
| And so that's just the way it is. | ||
| But I can tell you that I would say most of the inmates there, most of the black inmates were pro-Trump. | ||
| In fact, almost all the inmates are pro-Trump because he signed the first step back, gave you a chance to come home sooner. | ||
| So I think that he should use the military to break the cycle. | ||
| The Democrats don't want to do it. | ||
| They don't want to break that cycle. | ||
| They want that dependency on them. | ||
| They want to run these. | ||
| They're running these inner cities like plantations. | ||
| They don't care that blacks are killing each other and ruining their own culture and their own families. | ||
| They don't care because they're reliable voters. | ||
| They think they believe they got them under their thumb. | ||
| So the way to break that is to get them out of that environment, not by putting them in prison, because in prison doesn't change it. | ||
| Still in the same, hanging out with the same people, same culture inside of prison. | ||
| They go back out. | ||
| They just do it on the streets. | ||
| In prison, they have sex with each other. | ||
| They have gay sex. | ||
| When they get back out, they have sex with women again. | ||
| That's what a lot of them also do. | ||
| So, but you're not breaking that cycle. | ||
| Put them in the military, give them a positive outlet for that warrior ethos, something positive. | ||
| I'd like to see almost like a parallel prison system that is like, there's the normal prison system. | ||
| And if you're well-behaved there, then you get to go to the Midway house. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I just think there needs to be a total overhaul of the just system. | ||
| Obviously, it's not working the way it is now. | ||
| I mean, if a guy's a murderer, yes, put him away. | ||
| Right. | ||
| You don't want work to be able to do it. | ||
| Actually, I'd execute him. | ||
| Why should we pay for him to do that? | ||
| But if they're a drug offender or other nonviolent offender, I think the military is the right answer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Break that cultural cycle. | ||
| Yeah, I agree. | ||
| Because, you know, also, I feel for these guys. | ||
| Again, going to public school in Houston, it's like, you know, I'm talking to kids who are like, dude, I got to join a gang because if I don't, they're going to beat me up every day. | ||
| They're going to beat my ass every day I go home unless I join their gang. | ||
| And to join their gang, I got to commit a crime so that I'm in it for life. | ||
| And it's like, damn, dude, that sucked. | ||
| I don't know what to tell them at that point. | ||
| I mean, I'm not in that position. | ||
| I don't know what that's like, but it's hard for me to condemn a dude for wanting to join the gang that his brother's in, his cousin's in, and all of his friends are in and everybody he's known his whole life. | ||
| That's their career path. | ||
| That's their rite of passage in the manhood. | ||
| It's become part of the gang. | ||
| And that's their career path. | ||
| What else do they have? | ||
| So if you want to break that, put them in a positive war culture where they have real men giving them an example of what it means to be a man and teaching them how to be a man and give them a trade. | ||
| So they get out and they can break the cycle. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it's cliche, but that really is what you do if you actually love black people and don't want them to be a dysfunctional part of our society, which we don't. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Final segment of the American Journal. | ||
| My guest in studio, Stuart Rhodes. | ||
| Man, I'm just hypnotized by the visuals our crew comes up with. | ||
| Every day we got new visuals here. | ||
| I've never even seen them before. | ||
| Look at this. | ||
| You know how much work it takes to put this in? | ||
| This ain't AI, folks. | ||
| This is blood, sweat, and tears. | ||
| This is brought to you by the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| That's awesome. | ||
| I'm sorry, I got totally distracted. | ||
| Stuart Rhodes is with me. | ||
| He's in studio. | ||
| He's going to be on the other shows later today as well. | ||
| So make sure to capture him there. | ||
| You can, by the way, go to gives and go.com slash G-A-F-5B G-A-F-5B. | ||
| Stuart Rhodes needs help. | ||
| He's got legal issues. | ||
| He's still trying to work his way through. | ||
| And you haven't even really told me about your plans with Oath Keepers. | ||
| Oath Keepers after January 6th was sort of forcibly dissolved, but you've got some plans for a rebirth. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Phoenix-like from the ashes. | ||
| Tell us about it. | ||
| Yeah, so after I spent a month down there in the hill country doing disaster relief, I realized that I needed to restart the organization. | ||
| And also because what we see around the country, I think there's a lot of value in our mission still. | ||
| Disaster relief alone would be fantastic to have 40,000 trained men. | ||
| That's what we had at our peak on tapped. | ||
| If I had a disaster in any state, I could just call on them to come in and help. | ||
| And they did. | ||
| They did over 14 major hurricane relief missions. | ||
| So I just really took a look around and said, okay, they could still value there. | ||
| I mean, of course, we'll be targeted by the bad guys, but that's just the way it is. | ||
| That's just the way it goes. | ||
| So we'll be very careful. | ||
| I'll do my best to strengthen the organization. | ||
| You're never going to stop infiltration. | ||
| It's going to happen. | ||
| But we'll do our best to put in protocols in place that make it more difficult for us to be manipulated like we were on J6. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So we'll see how it goes. | ||
| It's too important a mission, though. | ||
| And it is. | ||
| And we can't let the fear of the powers that be stop us from organizing. | ||
| Because we really need to organize. | ||
| We have so much energy. | ||
| We have so much talent in our side of the aisle in our movement, the liberty movement, whatever you want to call it. | ||
| There's so much potential here. | ||
| And without organization, I really think a lot of that's going to waste. | ||
| Yeah, and we're going to focus. | ||
| I want to focus on a county level. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That's my big focus is on making strong counties. | ||
| Making sure you got a good sheriff, making sure you got a good judge, good prosecutor. | ||
| And that's what Soros did. | ||
| He went around all over the country and put in DAs. | ||
| When no one was looking in elections where most people don't even show up to vote, he packed the courts with his people. | ||
| And look at the outcome. | ||
| So we need to do our best to reverse that. | ||
| We need to take our counties back. | ||
| So a big part of what we do is going to be focused on local, not just political, but everything, our churches, our neighborhoods, getting strong again. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| I think community service is the best sort of organizing principle of all of that. | ||
| But we were talking in the last segment, and obviously the big story today is about the murder of that young woman, Jerushka, on the light rail in North Carolina. | ||
| And it seems like racial relations in this country, they're certainly not getting any better, but they're very different than they were five years ago. | ||
| And we're seeing a lot of people out right now. | ||
| In fact, I'll go to another video here really quickly, if you don't mind, and we'll comment on it. | ||
| This is Tucker Carlson yesterday at a talk that he's giving with a bunch of podcasters and stuff. | ||
| Clip number 33. | ||
| This is Tucker saying the quiet part out loud. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| I will say that the one thing you have to worry about in a multi-ethnic society is ethnic conflict because it's enduring. | ||
| It doesn't go away. | ||
| It's generational. | ||
| And we are moving toward that. | ||
| She was stabbed because she was white. | ||
| And everyone knows that, actually. | ||
| And knowing that and not being able to say anything about it because you fear you're going to be called names doesn't make the problem go away. | ||
| It makes you move to Bozeman. | ||
| And it makes the problem worse. | ||
| And that's what you're seeing. | ||
| Everyone I know who can afford it is moving to Bozeman or Jackson or Sun Valley or whatever, but they all have one thing in common. | ||
| Okay, let's just stop lying. | ||
| And I don't like that, okay? | ||
| Because that suggests a future of ethnic conflict, which is like ask anybody from a country that has, ask a Belgian. | ||
| Belgium has ethnic conflict. | ||
| So this is inherent to the human condition. | ||
| And you want to be very thoughtful in trying to avoid it. | ||
| And things like that exacerbate it like to a crazy, crazy animal level. | ||
| So that's Carlson talking about ethnic conflict, but I mean, just saying this girl was stabbed because she was white. | ||
| I mean, InfoWars was willing to come out and say that a long time ago. | ||
| People are finally starting to treat white people like we don't deserve to be destroyed all the time, which is interesting and good, I think. | ||
| But I mean, what's your take on this? | ||
| Well, in this case, well, the killer himself admitted that's what was his motivation. | ||
| He said, I got that white. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So it's out of the horse's mouth. | ||
| He admitted it was racially motivated. | ||
| I would say that in our society with a large number of mentally ill people set loose on the streets by the same usual suspects, the same judges, the same social workers, same viewpoint, sees them as victims, and they're the ones that need to be coddled. | ||
| And they just turn them loose on people. | ||
| You shouldn't be riding public transportation. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Find a way, ride share, find some other way to get there. | ||
| Date a guy will pick you up. | ||
| Whatever you got to do, don't be on a train like that. | ||
| That's just the way it should be, frankly. | ||
| It shouldn't have to be that way, but it's just the way it is. | ||
| Well, because other people, somebody posted a meme or an AI image of the girl, but she's got a gun and she's shooting the guy. | ||
| And other people commenting under that go, if she was armed and shot the guy, yeah, she'd defend herself, she'd be alive, but she'd be in prison and she'd be, you know, the rest of her life would be destroyed because they'd hunt her down and try to convict her of murder. | ||
| So it's a lose-lose situation. | ||
| Just don't ride the bus. | ||
| Because you defend yourself, you're going to jail. | ||
| You don't defend yourself. | ||
| You die. | ||
| Stay off the subway, stay off the train, stay off the buses. | ||
| That's what I would do. | ||
| I know, but that's not possible for everybody. | ||
| No, it's not. | ||
| But in that case, you better be switched on and have your capacity to defend yourself. | ||
| That's what I was saying. | ||
| It's not even as a joke. | ||
| You got to kind of act like you're Jason born. | ||
| Act like you're Jason born 24-7. | ||
| You're looking for the exits. | ||
| You're sizing everybody up. | ||
| Who's armed? | ||
| Who's not? | ||
| I mean, it sounds kind of silly, but like, you got to kind of live that way. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, if she had her back to the glass and her feet up between her and him and was looking at him and paying attention, he might not have chosen to attack. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So it's possible he would have passed her up and found somebody else. | ||
| But she was completely clueless and oblivious. | ||
| So if you look like you're going to be an easy victim, you're more likely to be a victim. | ||
| It's just the way it is. | ||
| That's true with any criminal of any color. | ||
| But the reality is, there is a number of black people out there who are racist because they've been brainwashed to be racist against whites, to believe that they're oppressed. | ||
| All their problems are to be blamed on the white devil. | ||
| I mean, look at Nation of Islam. | ||
| They overtly teach this to their people that whites are from the devil, that we're children of the devil. | ||
| That's what they're being taught. | ||
| And Nation of Islam is very popular in a lot of these big major inner cities. | ||
| Yes, you want it with a lot of black racists that the left declares it's not racist somehow because they're not in power. | ||
| They're not the dominant power in society. | ||
| So therefore, it's not racism. | ||
| Of course it's racism. | ||
| Yeah, they changed the definition of racism just like the vaccine. | ||
| I had professors at YOL LAW School like that. | ||
| Like, oh, it's impossible for black people to be racist because they're not in political power. | ||
| It's supposed to be power plus prejudice. | ||
| So they can be prejudiced, but because they aren't in power, even though we have a black president, I mean, it's completely nonsensical and it's just obviously, you know, fallacious and ridiculous. | ||
| And, you know, to be fair, this guy clearly was mentally ill. | ||
| I mean, and racist. | ||
| Well, and yeah, and racist. | ||
| I mean, his own mother said that he shouldn't be released. | ||
| And, you know, Alex, you know, points this out and does a great job doing it, but it's obvious. | ||
| You have a certain amount of people that are going to be mentally ill that are going to be unstable. | ||
| And if you treat those people in a certain way, then they're fine. | ||
| They're not a threat to anybody. | ||
| But when you constantly reinforce this idea that they're a victim and that they'd be a hero if they'd kill white people, or if you're a trans person, you're a hero if you kill Christians. | ||
| They're attacking you. | ||
| They're genociding you. | ||
| So anything is warranted in fighting back against them. | ||
| Obviously, you're going to have a couple people who believe that and go out and commit violent crime. | ||
| You have the whole of society doing that. | ||
| And I don't think he's going to get punished. | ||
| I heard Joe Biggs say that he believes in prison, the black guys are going to kill him. | ||
| I don't think so. | ||
| No, I don't think so. | ||
| They created GrowFundmes for him to try to raise money for this guy. | ||
| He'll be killed by the white guys in prison. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That's just going to kill him. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| So, I mean, look, I'm not, I don't want to see a race war in this country, but when you have black racists who are obviously racist and black supremacist, call them out from what they are the same way you'd call out a white supremacist. | ||
| Don't sugarcoat it. | ||
| Don't try to hide it. | ||
| Don't act like it's not there. | ||
| It's there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And so when you get on a bus and you see a guy, you know, looks like he does with a hoodie on, that's a threat. | ||
| It's the way it is. | ||
| So, and if he turns out to be a nice guy, great. | ||
| But until then, until proven otherwise, I'm going to see him as a threat. | ||
| Yeah, better safe than sorry. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| And I know you asked if we could take phone calls. | ||
| And of course we can. | ||
| Let's go and open up the phone lines. | ||
| We don't have that long, but we'll take as many as we can get to. | ||
| We might not even screen them. | ||
| Let's go to 1-877 or give us a call, rather, 1-877-789-2539-1877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call now. | ||
| And again, when it comes to the race war aspect of all of this, I don't think there's going to be a race war, and obviously I don't want there to be one. | ||
| But like you said, I mean, you have to. | ||
| I don't think there will be either. | ||
| I think the crossover vote of the black community for Trump was a bellwether moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| It showed a big opportunity we have. | ||
| And so it'd be a mistake for us to fall into the trap. | ||
| So I think white patriots need to be careful about not throwing the baby out with a bathwater. | ||
| Don't assume that every black person out there is out to kill you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| You can't assume that. | ||
| It's like every black shouldn't presume that every white person is KKK. | ||
| That'd be stupid, too. | ||
| That's what the bad guys want. | ||
| They want us to divide and conquer. | ||
| And, you know, it's really the easiest way to get to that point is to have people online only seeing this through a certain perspective. | ||
| Maybe go out and meet your neighbors. | ||
| Maybe go out and like walk around a little bit and remind yourself, like, oh, wait, 99.9% of people out there in the world, black, white, Asian, gay, Jewish, whoever, they're just going to be nice people and friendly, and you're probably going to get along with them really well. | ||
| So, you know, I think, you know, if we were still under lockdown, everybody was forced to be in their room by themselves, just seeing everything through the perspective of the algorithm. | ||
| It'd be a lot easier for them to warp people's minds towards violence and isolationism. | ||
| But go out and meet your neighbors. | ||
| And it turns out, you know, you'll realize like, oh, wait, right. | ||
| I'm getting a warped perspective online. | ||
| Yeah, definitely. | ||
| But it doesn't destroy the reality, though, that in the inner cities, in the gang-dominated communities, there's a problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| You know, and that's a broken culture. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And it needs to be fixed. | ||
| And I think it'd be best if they fix it themselves. | ||
| But I really do believe one of the better ways to do that is an alternative to prison. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Give them some other way to do it. | ||
| Well, and I would just say, you know, it's frustrating to me sort of the assumption that it'll only be white people standing up for white people. | ||
| Because my whole thing is like, why stand up for white people? | ||
| We stand up for black. | ||
| I am happy to stand up for black people if they're under attack. | ||
| I'm happy to stand up for Asian or Hispanics if they're under attack for their race. | ||
| So I think it's almost weird that like we just assume that it's like the only people that are going to stand up for white people are white people. | ||
| It's like that, it shouldn't be that way. | ||
| Everybody of every race should stand up for people if they're under attack because of their race. | ||
| So I sort of, I don't know. | ||
| I think it's like something that we all just kind of assume that if people are standing up against violence against white people, it's because they're white. | ||
| And it's like, white people stand up for every race. | ||
| Every race is standing up for white. | ||
| The media's not going to show you blacks or Hispanics calling out this guy has a dirtbag. | ||
| They're out there. | ||
| Yeah, they're definitely out there. | ||
| We've got Litmus, I think, in South Carolina. | ||
| Litmus test? | ||
| I guess so. | ||
| Am I reading that right? | ||
| The screen's a little far away since we rearrange the cameras when we have guests. | ||
| Go ahead, Litmus in South Carolina. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Hello, can you hear? | ||
| Hello, yes. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Hey, hey, Harrison, my name is Bentley. | ||
| I've called in a couple times before. | ||
| I know that you got, you know, not a lot of time. | ||
| I just wanted to bring attention to a case that happened in 2021. | ||
| I'm from North Carolina, born and raised in the city of Raleigh. | ||
| In 2021, my friend, a childhood friend of mine, I grew up with, his name was Dylan Wall. | ||
| He was a UPS driver and was just literally delivering packages working his route. | ||
| And a really eerily similar circumstances happened. | ||
| A black male came out of his house who was supposedly schizophrenic and just unloaded like two clips into my friend, into this UPS delivery driver as he's just walking to a random house to drop off a package. | ||
| And the guy had multiple arrests, multiple previous arrests, but the case never got the immediate attention that this one now is getting. | ||
| So almost something really, really similar happened in 2021. | ||
| And I would just like to bring attention to that. | ||
| This has been going on for a while now, even longer than people are realizing. | ||
| So RIP, Dylan. | ||
| Well, absolutely. | ||
| And, you know, even just in my own head, there's Bianca Ellis who, you know, stabbed a little boy at the grocery store and then is smiling in the court case. | ||
| There's Cannon Hinnant, who was shot in his front yard by a random black neighbor. | ||
| There was a guy who, or there was the kid who was like three years old, a twin who got taken out of his bed. | ||
| I mean, there's so many stories like this. | ||
| This one happened to break through. | ||
| I mean, what do you think it was about this case? | ||
| I guess because there was the video because it was so random. | ||
| It was so unexpected. | ||
| It's a pretty young girl, pretty young white girl, Ukrainian refugee. | ||
| I guess this is just everything combines. | ||
| This really is like sort of the George Floyd, you know, everything aligned for that case as well. | ||
| And then this one just happens to be the one that is the straw that breaks the camel's back, but it is far, far from the only example of this type of attack. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So it goes back to the problem of turning loose mentally ill people on society. | ||
| I mean, one of the main goals needs to be to keep society safe. | ||
| And if a person's not, you can't trust them not to be violent, they can't be in society. | ||
| So I don't know. | ||
| You can't rehabilitate them. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So all you can really do is keep them in an insane asylum the rest of their life. | ||
| So until they're actually safe. | ||
| Right. | ||
| You know, at some point in their life, maybe when he turns 60 or 70 years old, he's actually safe. | ||
| But until then, he's a threat. | ||
| And I met multiple guys like that in prison. | ||
| There's something wrong with them. | ||
| They're just repeat offenders. | ||
| They're violent. | ||
| They can't keep out of fights. | ||
| Right. | ||
| They wind up in something. | ||
| We met him in solitary confinement. | ||
| I was in there for political purposes, but they were in there because they're assault staff. | ||
| They assault other inmates. | ||
| They just can't help themselves. | ||
| Right. | ||
| They're just violent. | ||
| No, it's scary. | ||
| And, you know, the guy that, excuse me, the guy that stabbed the woman on the light rail in North Carolina, I mean, he was calling the cops saying, I've got a foreign object in my body that's controlling my thoughts. | ||
| Like the dude was crazy. | ||
| The dude was legitimately crazy why he was allowed to. | ||
| But he's been painted, you know, because of DEI, because of woke culture. | ||
| Oh, he's just a victim. | ||
| He's been victimized. | ||
| We got to coddle him and take care of him and put his needs first, not protect society from him. | ||
| That should be the priority while you treat him. | ||
| It's, oh, no, it's put him first. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's just completely absurd. | ||
| Thank you for the call, Litmus or Bentley, whatever you said your name was. | ||
| David in Las Vegas, thanks for calling in. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Oh, hello, Harrison. | ||
| Yeah, I just wanted to talk about the point that your guest made about situational awareness. | ||
| It's so basic to survival. | ||
| It always was basic to survival. | ||
| But with cell phones in everyone's hands, not only are people distracted, but they also have an excuse for ignoring what's going on around them. | ||
| Like remember Gavin Newsom pretending to be on the phone. | ||
| Everyone pretends to be on the phone when something horrible is going on. | ||
| It's a perfect excuse. | ||
| And it's just disgusting. | ||
| And this poor woman, just awful. | ||
| And of course, you guys, it might have been on Alex's show, played the clip of the audio clip of Joe Biden talking about the 1993 crime. | ||
| I played that yesterday. | ||
| That was, well, that needs to be every day, everywhere. | ||
| People should be taking out billboards in every major city, showing his words with his face. | ||
| Him telling everybody that the biggest domestic threat is white supremacy. | ||
| Everyone knows that's not true. | ||
| And it definitely got this guy wound up. | ||
| I mean, it's true for him, right? | ||
| It's true. | ||
| Like when they say that, they don't mean the greatest threat to the average American is white supremacy. | ||
| They are talking from a personal perspective. | ||
| They're saying the greatest threat we have to worry about is white supremacy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. | |
| Yes, sir. | ||
| That is true. | ||
| And, you know, if your dog bites, if a pit bull bites somebody, it doesn't matter whether he was trained poorly or whether he's just a defective dog. | ||
| You put him down, man. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That's pretty much what I got to say. | ||
| And I love you guys. | ||
| And I love my methylene blue and methyl drive. | ||
| Just wonderful. | ||
| You guys are doing amazing work. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| And thank you very much. | ||
| You got it. | ||
| We really appreciate it. | ||
| We really do genuinely thank everybody who goes to the alexjonstore.com and makes a purchase. | ||
| We understand our audience is not, they're not living off the dole. | ||
| They work hard for their money, and we really appreciate when you choose to spend it with us. | ||
| And we make sure it's worth it. | ||
| Ultra-methylene blue is incredibly powerful. | ||
| You had some last time. | ||
| I hear you talking about methylene blue every commercial break these days because we've been running that commercial so much. | ||
| So we'll have to get you a new bottle. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So situational awareness. | ||
| Did you have you heard that speech from Joe Biden in 1993, the 1993 crime bill, when he's going, I don't care where these people are from or what's wrong with them. | ||
| I just don't want them hitting my grandmother over the head with an iron bar. | ||
| That was old Joe. | ||
| That was old Joe. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And Clinton was into it. | ||
| I mean, what happened? | ||
| It's the same as immigration. | ||
| What happened where Democrats in the 90s are more right-wing than the most right-wing Republicans these days when it comes to things like crime? | ||
| Yeah, it's crazy. | ||
| They got in a bizarre world. | ||
| So I believe it's because they want to destabilize and destroy our country. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| What else can explain it? | ||
| Either they're insane. | ||
| Right. | ||
| One of the two. | ||
| Because they used to understand it. | ||
| They used to understand it. | ||
| You arrest criminals like that. | ||
| I don't care what color they are. | ||
| I don't care if the guy is if he's schizophrenic and endangered society. | ||
| I don't care if he's if I see a white guy in an overcoat on a subway, I'm thinking, you know, rifle or shotgun. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| You know, I'm just imagine walking down, walking down the street in Austin, and there's some white guy with a shirt off with scars all over his face, and he's doing the fentanyl lean and staring at me. | ||
| I'm not sitting there going, oh, but he's white. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| Oh, but it's a white man, a respectable white man. | ||
| I'm thinking, get the hell away from me, you fucking. | ||
| You zombie. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So, yeah, no, it genuinely has nothing to do with race. | ||
| But obviously, you know, the thing is that then the thing is that the assumption comes that if you talk about differences in race, you are therefore endorsing a like idea that blacks are therefore genetically incapable of living in white society. | ||
| And it's like, no, you just look at the stats and you go, look, black people are massively overrepresented in violent crime. | ||
| That's an issue. | ||
| And if we want to solve it, you have to at least confront it first and look at it and then find out what the reason is and what you can do to fix it. | ||
| But we're not even allowed to talk about it because we assumed that you're gangbanger culture. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It's the rap music, frankly, also. | ||
| Like in prison, guys are listening to rap music all the time and they want to be aspiring rappers. | ||
| That's their only way out, they think, is to be either a drug dealer or a pimp or a rapper. | ||
| Unless they're really good at basketball and tall enough or really good at football, a good boxer. | ||
| Unless they're an athlete, their only way out is through drugs, through pimping women, or being a rap star. | ||
| And so they glorify that lifestyle. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So even the guys who become successful rappers, they still want to live in that lifestyle. | ||
| They glorify it. | ||
| And like I said, it's a perversion of the wear culture. | ||
| And most of these successful rappers are completely putting on a show when they do that, by the way. | ||
| And Alex has talked about this because he's met some of them. | ||
| And he talks about Snoop Dogg sounding like Urkel from Family Matters in real life. | ||
| He's like, man, I'm just, I'm so cool. | ||
| But then behind the scenes, he's like, how much are we getting on this? | ||
| What is the return on our investment here? | ||
| And, you know, same thing with like Lil Wayne. | ||
| Lil Wayne has like a master's degree and like business studies. | ||
| Like these guys went to school and made it and then sell this stuff to the youth. | ||
| And it's sort of, it's a feedback loop, right? | ||
| Because, you know, some people, people always want to choose either or. | ||
| They go either, no, it has nothing to do with the culture. | ||
| It's their race. | ||
| They're just, you know, like this no matter what. | ||
| Okay, Mexico's screwed up now. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| The north half of Mexico, a lot of those young men are so screwed up, there's no fixing them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Could have put a bullet in their head. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| If they're in the cartels and they're into sex trafficking and all that crap. | ||
| That's why that's what El Salvador just put him. | ||
| Now, I like Urkel's glasses. | ||
| That's one thing I'll say about that. | ||
| He's got good glasses, Taste. | ||
| Look at that. | ||
| Styling. | ||
| He's styling. | ||
| All right. | ||
| We have time for at least one more call here. | ||
| Let's go to Mike in Georgia, Mike in Georgia, about that same vicious and pointless attack on the light rail. | ||
| Go ahead, Mike. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Yeah, so the thing that bothers me the most, less the guy that killed this poor little girl, are the people that stood around and did nothing. | ||
| We can, as a society, we can point fingers at black people, white people, politicians, judges, this and that, and the other thing. | ||
| But when we as a society stand there and let a young woman die alone after she's been brutalized by some psychotic, that's the problem. | ||
| It's not the black guy because bad crap happens all the time. | ||
| And when the lines are drawn now, I'm telling you, the lines are drawn. | ||
| And when this goes kinetic, there is no black and white, Muslim or Jew or Christian or any of that. | ||
| There's only one side of the line or the other. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| Yeah, I think I hope it never goes kinetic, but I think things will become very racial if anything actually breaks out like that, unfortunately, which is why we're trying to avoid it. | ||
| But yeah, the people standing around. | ||
| That guy is clueless. | ||
| He sees the guy walk by him. | ||
| He realizes his blood. | ||
| After a minute, there she goes. | ||
| She's just bleeding out. | ||
| No one's trying to put pressure on the wound. | ||
| No one's doing anything to help her. | ||
| It's disgusting. | ||
| Like the caller said, it really is disgusting. | ||
| I had to kill that bastard. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I'd have killed him. | ||
| If I was on that train, he'd be dead. | ||
| And again, it's just like they don't know. | ||
| They're not looking around. | ||
| We are completely disassociated. | ||
| They're not even trying to help her. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| You know, doing nothing for her. | ||
| Eventually, somebody, I think like two or three minutes after the stabbing, two people ran up and tried to help her, but it was way too late at that point. | ||
| And yeah, it's just, you know, we're completely isolated, atomized. | ||
| We have no fellow, you know, no fond feeling for our fellow Americans. | ||
| We're all just, you know, individuals happen to be on the same train at the same time. | ||
| But we're supposed to be a nation. | ||
| We're supposed to be a family. | ||
| We're supposed to look out for each other. | ||
| But that's been systematically eliminated. | ||
| Again, absolutely brutal, and I think the Oath Keeper's mission in maintaining – can we take it down? | ||
| I can't even watch it. | ||
| I mean, honestly, it is too brutal. | ||
| It's too brutal. | ||
| Got the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys riding the train. | ||
| You know, like the guys in the Guardian Angels in New York. | ||
| That's what they did, yeah. | ||
| And that was before the 93 crime bill. | ||
| So, you know, again, it's just up. | ||
| It's up. | ||
| The government has an obligation to fix this problem or else it is. | ||
| That kind of stuff's happening. | ||
| How come there's not police on the trains? | ||
| It's a great quote. | ||
| There were two police officers, one car over. | ||
| Not that it would have helped. | ||
| I mean, not that they could have intervened to stop the attack. | ||
| But it goes to show you. | ||
| I mean, a cop can be two feet from you. | ||
| It's still not close enough to stop a guy stabbing you from behind. | ||
| So you got to defend yourself. | ||
| Folks, go support Stuart, the Oath Keeper, Stuart Rhodes, GibsonGo.com, G-A-F-5B, gives and go.com slash G-A-F-5B. | ||
| Stuart Rhodes needs help. | ||
| He's reinitiating the Oath Keepers because we're not going to go down just because the left wants to call us bad names. | ||
| Stuart, thanks so much for being with us today. | ||
| You bet, man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Networks lie to you about what's happening now. | |
| Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | ||
| Go to the Alex Show store.com and get 25% off on all the apparel, the widest selection of t-shirts, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds, ball caps, you name it. | ||
| The very best supplements that will change your life. | ||
| 50% off, limited time. | ||
| It's only to go for four or five days more maximum of the ultramethylene blue, the very best. | ||
| You've heard of methylene blue, well, this is the best. | ||
| We have the very best chili, the very best RC muscle, the very best cardiovascular detox, spike protein detox. | ||
| Even if you didn't take the shots, everybody needs to detox at least once a year. | ||
| Ultimate life force. | ||
| You can get it for 50% off. | ||
| Also, free $10 ultimate fundraiser sale. | ||
| If you spend over $75 in the store, you get $10 off at checkout immediately. | ||
| Got that? | ||
| Just another giant discount up of everything. | ||
| But you want to get the bovine colostrum arts, a 2,000 milligram first coop. | ||
| It is incredible. | ||
| We have the best. |
Export Selection