Aug. 14, 2025 - American Journal - Breanna Morello
02:37:33
The American Journal: Infowars Is Under Attack! Democrat State Judge Ignores Federal Court to Capture Alex Jones Operation’s Studios & Assets - FULL SHOW - 08/14/2025
The American Journal (08/14/2025) features Harrison Smith defending InfoWars against asset seizures, dismissing lawsuits as politically motivated while Trump warns Russia over Ukraine’s stalled peace talks. Smith attacks the Smithsonian for "DEI brainwashing," mocks California’s redistricting and AB 495 (a guardianship bill critics call exploitative), and slams media stings like Inside Edition’s bait tactics. He praises Adam Friedland for rejecting Israeli propaganda but pivots to medical misinformation, urging skepticism of statins and cholesterol narratives. Concluding, Smith ties Democratic performativity—like Newsom’s fake profanity—to deeper systemic deception, framing resistance as a fight against "inverted reality." [Automatically generated summary]
He pardons people who are criminals and do pretty dastardly things, like cause the deaths of five different law enforcement officers during January 6th.
The victims were shot at random in parking lots, going to school, mowing the lawn, gripping the Washington area in fear in the fall of 2002.
During three terrifying weeks, 10 people were killed.
Three more were wounded, including a 13-year-old boy.
The snipers turned out to be John Alan Muhammad, a mentally disturbed man who planned to kill his ex-wife and wanted it to look like she was another random victim.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith coming to you live this Thursday morning from the InfoWars headquarters here in Austin, Texas.
And that's right, folks.
We're still here.
We are still here.
I know NPR may have told you that our doors would be locked, our business shut down, Alex Jones consigned to the waste bin of history.
But alas, they lied to you again, didn't they?
Didn't they?
Because here I am in the Infowars studio, still fighting the fight, and we will be here for the time being.
We'll get into some of that.
Again, I don't have a ton of information to get to you.
All I can say is that the fight goes on, and it's almost funny.
It's almost funny watching the reporters quiver in glee with the prospect that InfoWars will soon go down and the menace of Alex Jones will be banished forever.
And it's like, well, if you guys ever actually looked into anything you report on, you would know we aren't going anywhere.
And whatever happens with the outcome of the InfoWars trial, whether they are able to, you know, mount our head on a trophy and put it on the mount on the mantle, they are able to take control of the InfoWars brand, it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter because we're going to continue regardless because we have alternative pathways into the future.
And in fact, the moment that all of this goes away, we'll be moving to a much bigger and more advanced facility.
I'll just leave it at that.
So celebrate all you want, you absolute morons.
Once again, your victory is hollow and your success is an illusion.
And we will continue to defeat you because we actually have the American people on our side.
And regardless of the rigged trials, the truth can't be stopped.
So good luck with all of that, folks.
I'm still here.
We're still here and we will be for the time being.
And as soon as we're not here, we're just going to evolve and get even bigger and better.
And that, of course, is entirely thanks to you going to thealexjonestore.com and keeping us on the air and in the fight and allowing us the flexibility and maneuverability to evade capture, resist destruction, and continue to operate this all-important outlet for truth, justice, free speech, liberty, the American way, all of these wonderful things that the powers that be fear, like the boogeyman.
Nothing scares them more than an enlightened and informed, and most importantly, active and engaged populace.
And that's the legion we are leading.
So, yeah, we're still here.
Sorry.
Sorry to tell you that.
We'll explain a little bit about what's going on, but mostly we'll be focusing on the news of the day, as always, as the battle continues over the fate of humanity.
And we'll be here to document and direct it all with your support at thealexjonesstore.com.
For now, let's begin today as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch.
All right, here it is for your Daily Dispatch for Thursday, the 14th of August, 2025.
Trump warns of severe consequences if Russia doesn't stop Ukraine war after Putin meeting.
Donald Trump spoke at the Kennedy Center in Washington about the upcoming U.S.-Russia summit in Alaska.
The summit, scheduled for Friday in Anchorage, aims to discuss ending the war in Ukraine amid criticisms from Ukraine at President Zelensky over Ukraine's exclusion in peace talks.
Trump described the summit as a feel-out meeting to assess Putin's intentions, and he says he hopes to hold a summit, a second trilateral meeting with Putin and Zelensky soon after.
Trump warned of very severe consequences if Putin refuses to stop the war.
Walzelinsky rejected Russian demands to withdraw from 30% of Donetsk, reaffirming Ukraine will not cede territory.
The summit's outcome could shape future ceasefire efforts, but European leaders stress Ukraine's inclusion is vital, and failure by Russia to engage may prompt increased Western pressure, which to me all rings a little bit hollow, because if there was anything more severe that we could be safely imposing on Russia, we would have done it by now.
I guess the idea is more tariffs.
Terrors haven't worked at all anyway in the first place.
So what are the consequences?
I guess the consequences in that case would be something like giving the long-ranged missiles to Ukraine so they could bomb Moscow to smithereens, in which case, I guess Russia would probably use their nukes.
So let's not do that.
And let's not do that.
How about we just don't do that?
We'll bring you more on the Ukraine-Russia summit.
Right now, Zelensky is meeting with UK Prime Minister Kier Starmer at 10 Downing Street, which is very funny to me.
I don't know why.
It's just very funny when you have the two global powerhouses meeting in Alaska to decide the fate of the world.
And then you have the two chumped up, self-important little brothers of the world powers meeting in the UK and pretending like they control anything or have any say whatsoever over the fate of nations.
I find it funny.
Meanwhile, wholesale prices rose 0.9% in July, much more than expected.
U.S. wholesale inflation rose by 0.9% in July, surprising economists who anticipated smaller increases.
The producer price index, which tracks inflation before consumer impact, also saw a year-over-year increase of 3.3%, exceeding economists' expectations.
Core consumer prices increased by 3.1%, up from 2.9% in June, signaling a continued rise above the Federal Reserve's 2% target.
Cheaper gas and slowing rain growth may mitigate the overall impacts of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump on import costs.
Meanwhile, the White House launches a review of Smithsonian Museums.
We spent a lot of time on this today.
It's just we're it's just the same.
It's the same cycle that we enter into over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again, in which the left does something outrageous that is clearly and openly and explicitly predicated on a deep seated hate or some sort of, you know, ideological impulse.
And then Republicans get back in power, try to just return to normal.
And that return to normal is portrayed in the media as straight up fascism.
So, what's actually happened here is that the Smithsonian museums have, over the last decade, been completely overcome by a ridiculous DEI, ESG, Project 1619, anti-white, anti-Christian,
anti-American ideology that has completely warped the perspective of the exhibits there and is frankly seething, just like bubbling over with hatred for the people of this country.
And so, President Trump is simply reversing that, is just saying, hey, let's go back to just telling history and not using history as a cudgel to try to, you know, get benefits for your racial group in the modern day.
So, we're going back to just having the Smithsonian be science and not ideology.
And that, of course, is being portrayed as literal fascism.
As Donald Trump simply says, hey, let's get rid of this SJW crap everywhere.
So, we'll get into it.
We will get into it.
This includes all the Smithsonian museums, including the African American Museum, which people are very up in arms about.
They're very concerned that Donald Trump is going to impose his view of the world this way.
I got an idea of how we can appropriately honor our past.
I'll tell you about it in just a little bit.
Meanwhile, Representative Paul Luna says lawmakers have evidence of interdimensional beings.
Representative Ana Paulina Luna of Florida said on Wednesday during a podcast with Joe Rogan that lawmakers have seen evidence of interdimensional beings, and we will show you that video in just a little bit.
Whether this really is her telling us the truth about what she's seen as a congresswoman, or whether this is sort of a form of soft disclosure ahead of some sort of alien hoax coinciding with these various reports about mysterious objects in space that could very well be alien spacecraft,
or whether Anna Paulina Luna herself is being deceived and lied to by the intelligence community.
We'll try to look into that.
We'll see what we can make of it.
But of course, the idea of interdimensional beings rather than space aliens has been something that I personally have considered the truth for a long time and has been a talking point here on Infowars for a while.
Meanwhile, and finally, Israeli settlement plans will bury the idea of a Palestinian state, minister says, Israeli far-right minister, finance minister, Bezalilil Smotrick.
So, yeah, Israeli far-right minister Molok Baal Smotrick has said that plans to build more than 3,000 homes in a controversial settlement project in the occupied West Bank will, quote, bury the idea of a Palestinian state.
The so-called E1 project between Jerusalem and Male Adam settlement has been frozen for decades amid fierce opposition internationally.
Building there would effectively cut off the West Bank from occupied East Jerusalem and significantly obstruct its territorial continuity, continuousness.
Smotrick said it was thwart the idea of a Palestinian state because there's nothing to recognize and no one to recognize because they're committing genocide.
Again, it's not even about Gaza.
It has nothing to do with Hamas.
Hamas doesn't have power in the West Bank.
No, it's just ethnic cleansing for the sake of ethnic cleansing and the continued expansion of illegal settlements occupied by terrorists and funded by America with the support of the American government.
As we know, Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, went and visited these illegal terrorist settlements in the West Bank just a few weeks ago, just ahead of this announcement.
And so I'm calling once and for all on the good-hearted, loving, God-fearing people of the world to band together and destroy this satanic little outcropping, cancerous growth on the ass of humanity.
We can just do away with them forever.
And we can never, what if we never had to talk about Israel ever again?
What if, folks, I mean, what would we talk about?
What would there be to do?
I mean, what would the news have to report on if every other headline wasn't about this despicable little hive of gremlins on the coast of the Mediterranean?
God bless Israel.
I mean, I don't want anything bad to happen to them.
I just want them to shut the hell up forever and to stop being evil little rats.
Just stop being rats, stop being evil for the love of God.
And I know that might sound crazy.
If that sounds extreme to you, maybe you should look back at yesterday and the day before and the day before that and the day before that.
And you can go back day by day, every single day for the last year and a half to see every single day the announcement of some new ridiculous, anti-human, just flagrant abuse of innocent people by this incredibly powerful psychopathic state of murderous weirdos.
Okay.
I don't know how long we have to put up with this, but it's like not ever once do you see them like, well, you know, maybe we can do something that helps everybody.
Maybe just once, like just a single time you had a single Israeli spokesperson or something suggest that maybe they don't try to kill all of their neighbors.
Like if just once one of their people would like counter signal what's going on, you know, maybe we could have some hope for the rest of them.
But for the love of God, it's just a continual push towards the abyss, a continual push towards just ethnic eradication, a genocide, just nuclear war, murder, drawing America in.
It's just, it's just awful.
It's just continually awful, and it only gets worse.
So they're not going to stop.
There's nothing stopping them.
So we have to stop.
We have to go in and we have to stop them.
We have to stop them with everything we've got for the sake of humanity, just like America and the UK and France and the Soviet Union had to band together to destroy the evil explosion of just vile outrage that was the Nazi party in Germany.
Let's do that for Israel because they're worse, because they're literally worse than the Nazis.
Okay.
I don't know.
I don't know what else to say at this point.
They make the Nazis look like Girl Scouts.
They make the Nazis look like idiots, honestly.
I mean, the Nazis were just exuding generosity when it came to the way they treated the people they didn't want in their country compared to the way Israel is treating the people they don't want in their own country and in what is not Israel, but what they want to be Israel.
It really is.
It really is beyond despicable.
And it's heart-wrenching and brutal.
And look, I know that there are a lot of people out there, there are a lot of Jews out there, a lot of Israelis out there that disagree with what's going on.
And that's not enough.
And that's not worth it.
And basically, as long as you are, I mean, we just need to, I guess we just need to take on just the ADL perspective, right?
Silence is violence.
Silence is complicity.
Simply ignoring what's going on or just, you know, saying that you don't like what's going on.
It's just not enough.
You have to actively engage in the dismantling of the Israeli state because anything short of that means that you're on the side of the bad guys and you have to be held to account for that.
So again, I don't know how much longer this can go on.
But like, can the Pope call a crusade?
Can the Pope and the Patriarch of the Orthodox Church come together in defense of the Christian population in the West Bank that has been there for 2,000 years?
Remember, when Israel was founded in 1948, the West Bank was 85% Christian, folks.
It was 85% Christian.
It's down to about 10% Christian now over the intervening time period.
And they're trying to eradicate that tiny remnant with the help of Mike Johnson and others in the Trump administration.
Can we call a crusade?
Can we call a crusade already and expel these demons from the land of Christ once and for all?
I mean, it's been, what, 70 years?
I think that's enough.
I think it's been a nice experiment.
Everybody thought, won't it be great if the Jews have their own homeland where they can be safe and they can flourish and they can prove us all wrong about what it's like when they're in charge.
And then it's been 70 years and it's just been 70 years of the most brutal, horrific, oppressive, manipulative, deceptive scumbaggery the world has ever seen.
So, all right, time's up.
Time's up.
You've had your chance to prove you are capable of this.
You are not.
You are not.
You descend continually every day, spiraling down into the abyss of hell, and you're dragging the rest of the world with you.
And for the sake of all of us, we have to cut off the hand that's grabbing us and pulling us down so we can rise once again to the surface, see the light of the sun, and just consign these people to the depths of hell where they belong.
I'm talking Bezalel Smoke Trick.
I'm talking Netanyahu.
I'm talking all of these guys, all of these people in charge of Israel right now.
What the hell are they doing walking around free and clear and committing genocide in front of everybody?
How are we allowing this to happen?
How are we allowing this to happen?
It genuinely, it genuinely doesn't make any sense.
And again, I got a lot of other stuff to talk about, and I wasn't even planning to get on this, but it's just you see the story like this, and it's just yet another one, yet another.
I mean, every day, really every day, every day we have to hear about Israel committing another just outrageous act of genocide.
I mean, I got stories from today about the dozens of Palestinians killed.
Yesterday, dozens of Palestinians killed, waiting in line for food.
The starvation crisis continues.
There's more information coming out now about some of the, you know, the past crimes against humanity Israel has been engaged in.
It just goes on and on and on.
And it's like, you know, Alex loves the question, like, okay, if you put all the Jews onto Mars, you know, would that fix all the problems in the world?
It's like, I don't know.
Maybe, maybe not.
If Israel sank into the ocean tomorrow, I mean, what would we talk about?
What would there be to do?
I mean, what could we focus on?
What could we pour our energy into?
You know, what could we achieve if we weren't being dragged to hell with this millstone of Israel around our neck?
You can just imagine the possibilities.
They really are endless and amazing.
But no, instead, we just have to constantly every day be hearing about this evil, evil, evil little nation on the coast of the Mediterranean.
That's your daily dispatch brought to you by the AlexJonesStore.com.
Again, at a certain point, at a certain point, at a certain point, I guess that's just what I'll say.
At a certain point.
And, you know, just to just to sort of settle things down or whatever, we'll go to a video here.
This is Adam Friedland of the Adam Friedland show, who is Jewish and he went on a birthright trip.
And he talks about his experience and how actually seeing up close and personal what it was like there in the West Bank of Israel caused a crisis of conscience in him and changed his worldview.
And, you know, that's got to be tricky.
Israel brings a bunch of Jewish college students from America with the intention of successfully brainwashing them to be lifelong subjects of a foreign state.
And instead, they accidentally reveal to them the brutal and inhuman nature of the Israeli state, causing massive backlash.
It's sort of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
Let's go to clip number two here.
This is Jewish comedian Adam Friedland describing his birthright trip to Israel.
They pulled out and they took us to the West Bank like the last month I was there.
And I realized that I was like, this is the wrong side of history.
And I saw like you looked down at the Arab village that was underneath where this settlement was.
And you see how these people are living under constant surveillance and they're being demeaned and dehumanized.
And then you see these guys like building these tracked houses like they live in Orange County, you know, in the middle of the middle of like this political reality, which is brutal and like inhumane.
And I lost it.
I lost it then.
And I went back and I told my parents and we got in big arguments.
I was like, you know, this is what we were told was important was to support Israel so the Holocaust doesn't happen again.
That's what we were told.
And that's what my parents were told when they were growing up and they knew survivors, you know, and that freaked them out.
And I understand why there's like this like narrative in the Jewish community, but like that doesn't make Jews more safe.
You know, it's a failure of a project.
And now we're seeing like this bloody reality.
unidentified
Yeah, but the response is crazy because the response is insane.
Good on Adela Friedland for resisting the brainwashing, resisting the mind control that's designed to guide him into the path of belief that the Palestinians aren't humans.
And not only do you therefore not have to worry about them suffering, it's actually a good thing and it's to be celebrated.
And, you know, we've shown you videos and there are infinite numbers of videos out there.
You know, the podcasts of the Israeli guys going, you know, people think that the Israelis are, you know, upset that the Palestinians are starving.
It's like, no, that makes us have more fun.
Like, when we're out partying in Tel Aviv, when we remember that Gazans are starving just a few miles away, it makes it more fun for us.
And it's like, yeah, we're winning victory.
So like, good on Adam Friedland for resisting that brainwashing, resisting that coercion to strip him of his humanity and engage him in this supremacist ideology.
This whole week has just been miserable for me, frankly, to be honest with you, because my whole family's sick and I'm sick.
And I can never get to sleep.
So I think my patience is wearing a little bit thin.
And I'm just, it's just a low-level, simmering, pissed-off attitude I find myself in.
So when I hear about the Israelis, again, just creating more West Bank settlements to further extend their illegal control of an occupied state of subjects that they oppress relentlessly.
I just, I can't act like this is okay.
Can't act like this is okay.
So we'll try to keep a cap on it for the time being as much as I can.
But there's a lot.
There's a lot worth being pissed off about today, especially in the just everything is completely utterly inverted and insane.
Things like this Smithsonian reorganization, which again, it's like, I don't know, I don't know, man.
I don't know what we're supposed to do with these people that come in actively sabotage history museums in order to warp history so it fits in their ridiculous anti-human, anti-white perspective.
And then any attempt to correct that is treated as fascism.
Kind of like how they put homosexual pornographic books in elementary schools.
But if you try to take those out, it's fascism, right?
They try to impose their ideology on your children against your will, without your knowledge, if they get away with it.
And the moment you find out and try to stop them, you're the fascist.
You're the bad guy.
You're burning books just like the Nazis.
And I don't know, at this point, like it really is getting to the point where it's like, well, yeah, I guess it is like the Nazis.
Maybe they were on to something, right?
Like, well, do you question the Holocaust?
It's like, I don't know, I questioned October 7th.
That was a lot closer in time to where we are now.
And there were like 100 lies told about that that are still being repeated to this day.
Babies being burned, you know, massive mass rapes being used as a weapon of war.
That Hamas was responsible for all of the deaths and murders by the fact that we have the on-board camera footage of the Apache helicopters firing at the cars full of hostages in Israel.
We have the firsthand accounts of the people in the kibbutzes of the Israeli tanks raining fire down on them and killing everyone else in the kibbutz.
So, I mean, at a certain point, like you, I don't know.
I personally am being driven to desperation because what is it going to take to stop this?
What is it going to take to stop the endless bloodletting of the innocent Palestinians?
I mean, what is it going to take?
And it's like, so far, every moderate, understanding, you know, sort of middle-of-the-road attempt to get this to stop, we just get spit in our face, apparently.
So, what is it going to take?
What is it going to take?
And what is it going to take to get especially the Jews here in America to really stand up against this in a real, full-fledged way?
I mean, what is it going to take to even just temper this just explosion of evil that's come out of Israel in the last year and a half?
Again, when you have Randy Fine, American congressman saying, let them starve.
It would be bad enough if he thought it secretly, never admitted it.
No, they're out in the open saying this is what this is what they're doing.
And to me, I got to focus on this because it's the biggest issue.
It's the biggest source of evil.
The control they exert over America is absolutely unacceptable and significantly larger than anybody should be okay with.
And it's like, okay, are we going to talk about interdimensional beings?
Is that what we're going to talk about today?
We talk about UFOs.
Or are we going to talk about the genocide happening in front of all of our faces that we're all complicit in?
Are we going to hear another report about how we have more evidence about F guys?
Do you know that the FBI colluded with the Hillary Clinton campaign to frame Trump for being a Russian puppet?
Guys, have you heard of this?
Guys, they just came out with evidence that the FBI might be crooked.
Hey, guys, they're thinking about maybe one day starting indictments.
So should we focus on that for the whole show?
We could.
I mean, I'm not even joking.
There's literally these bombshell FBI timeline exposes political interference in Clinton corruption probe.
What?
Oh, my goodness.
So I'm, you know, okay.
Oh, more evidence.
Great.
Oh, the FBI was, oh, they were, oh, they covered up for Clinton, did they?
Oh, wow.
And we're just learning.
We're all just learning about this.
We have all trusted the FBI until right now.
It's like, I can't take that seriously.
Hey, as soon as there's an arrest, I'll report on it.
As soon as there's an indictment, I will report on it.
As soon as there's a grand jury that's been impaneled and is being given evidence and issuing indictments against literally anybody, oh, yeah, I'd be happy to report on it.
But every day, we get more evidence of the same crime that we've known about since before the 2016 election.
I mean, my God, James Comey went on TV and told us that Hillary Clinton committed crimes in October or September of 2016.
What are we doing here?
It's 2025 and they're reporting on the fact that the FBI covered up for Hillary Clinton when James Comey himself went on television and said, I'm covering up for Hillary Clinton in the summer of 2016.
What are we doing here?
How are we even treating this as if it's a bombshell or a headline or a revelation at all?
It's just exhausting and annoying, infuriating and exhausting and infinite.
It's infinite.
It never ends.
It never stops.
goes on and on and on and on and on again that's a that that is sort of part of it It's like I would never want America to be Israel, to behave like them because it's the behavior.
It's what they're engaged in.
It's the acts that they are willfully committing that are so abominable and despicable and just I reject it outright.
But at least for comparison's sake, you could just imagine living in a country that wasn't saddled with a foreign occupying leadership.
What if just every single day there were headlines about how America was just taking over more of Mexico and just slaughtering every Mexican we found there?
And there were stories about American colonists going in and burning Mexican towns to the ground and taking them over or just doing whatever, just going to war against everybody, just bombing the capital of Canada, just assassinating every single Canadian nuclear scientist in an afternoon.
Like you can just imagine, like, what if, just what if America behaved like Israel?
And while I would never want to do that, because I'm not evil, at least gives you, you know, two ends of the spectrum to identify and think maybe if we could just move a little bit more towards that direction.
What if America did things for ourselves because it benefited us and regardless of what anybody said about it or what anybody thought about it or any non-American objections were just ignored and overridden and we just did what we wanted anyway?
Wouldn't that be something?
What if we just had a government to serve us and do what we want?
Which is why, and again, it sucks because we're losing our spirit.
We're losing our soul.
We're losing our character as America.
And we're being forced to do this.
We're being forced to do this.
All we want is to have a country where people respect one another and they respect the rule of law and they just do what they're supposed to out of their own free will because they know consciously that cooperation and mutual respect is just better for everybody.
We all just engage in our community activities in this spirit of goodwill and friendship.
But instead, instead, we have half of the country just engaged in this despicable crusade against our own nation, against our own people.
We would love to just have the classic image of the 1950s and the cop who doesn't carry a gun, he carries a billy club, and he's helping get cats out of the tree and direct traffic and helping little kids cross the street.
And then when there's a crime, you go and you arrest criminal and you severely punish them and you remove them from the community to both just protect the community from them as well as a signal to the rest of the community, this is how we treat you when you don't follow the rules.
Instead, we have this deconstructionist, racially motivated inversion campaign where police are defunded, the crime runs rampant.
So suddenly now we have to have stormtroopers walking around our nation's capital to just bring about basic law and order, just basic safety.
Now requires heavily armed, like, you know, military squadrons going out and rounding up gang members and children who are robbing cars and mugging people and murdering strangers on the streets of Washington, D.C. All we want is things just to be normal and calm and nice.
Instead, we have to wage this constant battle against these subversive elements that are insistent and obsessed with destroying our history, destroying all of the underlying foundational concepts of this nation that allow us to be free and safe and not under the thumb of some tyranny.
But because people can't control themselves, they have to be controlled.
Because they've been convinced that the concept of law and order is somehow white supremacy and you have to tear it down by letting criminals out in the street.
Well, now we've got to have barbed wire and fences and militarized police forces patrolling the streets.
The judges could just do their job and try to actually stop legitimate abuses of the government, then we wouldn't have to find workarounds for judicial review inching ever closer to a dictatorial or imperial executive branch.
I don't know what it's going to take to get us back to some place of normality, but I personally am sick of waiting for somebody in charge to do the right thing to stop the bleeding of this country.
I just wish just one person in a position of power would have the willingness to actually stand up for the American people.
We thought it was Trump for a while, but he's just failed and he is failing.
And so ridiculous because I said this about the Infowars trial, the bankruptcy.
I mean, other than I think Marjorie Taylor Greene has come on and said, yeah, it's bad what's happening to Alex Jones.
I really can't think of a single other American politician who has even referenced what's going on with Alex Jones and InfoWars.
And the fact that it's not, it's not even speculative.
You don't even have to take our word for it.
They, in their own words, have told you that they launched a lawsuit to destroy Alex Jones' free speech over and over and over and over and over again.
They told you, they told the judge, they told the jury.
They had press conferences.
They said, our goal is to silence Alex Jones.
They might as well just get up and go, we are abusing the legal system.
Our goal is to abuse the legal system.
Our goal is to deny Alex Jones his human rights, the rights guaranteed to him by the Bill of Rights and the Constitution as immutable rights given to him by God.
We are using the legal system, pretending it's about money, pretending it's about Sandy Hook.
Really, we're just finding a point of vulnerability to exploit to silence him and stop him from speaking out because of his political activity.
Remember, not a single, in fact, maybe we'll just go to the, maybe we'll have to go to the video.
I've already covered this.
Ad nauseum.
Whatever.
I'll just say it again.
You can go back into Google News Archives.
You can search Alex Jones, Sandy Hook, and there is not a single article talking about Alex Jones and Sandy Hook or Alex Jones causing trouble with Sandy Hook.
Nothing.
It's nothing.
There's nothing relating Alex Jones as being the Sandy Hook guy until the day Trump gets elected.
The day after Trump gets elected, the first article appears associating Trump with Alex Jones and Alex Jones with Sandy Hook.
And that's what it's been about the entire time.
Within like a week, they had lawsuits fired up and it's all being coordinated, quarterback, funded, and operated outright by the Democratic Party and the deep state operatives trying to silence us.
So the people that we've elected, ostensibly, theoretically, supposedly to uphold our rights, where are they?
And why won't a single person speak out about this or even attempt to intervene in some way or even just suggest that this might not be something that we want to set precedent for in America.
That a radio host or a free speech advocate or anybody with any form of platform can have their lives destroyed, all of their money stolen, everything they've ever owned confiscated from them.
At this point, what, five years of their life just embroiled in this completely fraudulent case, every step of this has been fraudulent.
Every step of the way, this lawsuit, this bankruptcy has been completely fraudulent, completely rigged, completely illegal.
Even the default decision that is the whole reason any of it happened.
They literally requested documents that don't exist and then declared a default judgment because we didn't provide the documents that don't exist that they just asserted should exist.
It's honestly genuinely completely insane.
Where are the lawyers' guilt?
Where's the ACLU?
Where are the free speech advocates?
Where are any of them to try to defend us?
I mean, what it gets to is just the, you know, the point, like we've got things like this.
So the FBI, DEA, is now patrolling Georgetown in Washington, D.C. Okay, and we got this video.
We can go to it from freedomnews.tv.
I think I put it in the folder as well.
We want to full screen it.
And you see guys walking around with like bulletproof vests and their DEA or whatever.
And here you have some Twink soy boy coming out to try to act tough to them.
Now, interestingly, you have people like Jared McDonald Evoy, which that's funny, a hyphenated name, I guess.
I guess he tried to, I guess he took his wife's name.
He says, remember when conservatives said the lockdowns were government overreach?
Does that sentence not tell you everything you need to know about these people's values?
See, Donald Trump put federal agents on the streets to stop the outrageous levels of crime targeting innocent people to arrest the carjackers and the muggers and the murderers that are going unarrested or punished by the municipal law enforcement.
And the left is coming out screaming fascism.
Oh my God, it's authoritarianism.
Oh my God, Trump's a dictator.
If he'd done the same thing, but said actually he's going after small business owners and people that refuse to put a cloth symbol over their mouth and nose, people who refuse to take an experimental, unapproved, and at this point, entire, like everybody knows, entirely ineffective and in fact dangerous and deadly vaccine.
If he'd sent battalions of soldiers onto the American streets to arrest people for not following unlawful military grade medical guidelines, then they would be all for it.
When you actually want to send troops out to deal with the rampant crime being committed by criminals, it's fascism.
One of the funniest things is people are posting images.
They're like, I can't believe it.
Washington, D.C. is being, and they're posting images from January of 2021 after they put up barbed wire fences and sealed off the entire Capitol complex and the White House and every government building was completely barricaded and barbed wired.
And you had the military lining the streets.
Why?
Because a protest got flashbanged and tear gassed and wandered into the Capitol through open doors.
So in a way, these people don't believe any, they don't believe anything.
They don't believe anything.
You know, the interesting thing about what Trump is doing is he's protecting everybody in D.C. You'll notice that the soldiers that we just showed you patrolling, they're in Georgetown.
They're in Georgetown, which is not Washington, D.C. proper.
It's not where any government buildings are, really.
the soldiers in the National Guard that are patrolling the streets, they're patrolling the streets for the benefit of the civilians there in Washington, D.C. It'd probably look a little bit different if this level of safety and this level of law enforcement was reserved exclusively for those in power.
That's what happened in January 2021.
In January 2021, the government's buildings were completely sealed off from the public and they were guaranteed absolute safety and exclusion from the rest of the hoi polloy down here.
Donald Trump's actually sending the military out to protect the streets rather than protect himself from the people of America.
At the end of the day, you've got gangs running around, right?
Why do people join gangs?
People join gangs for a sense of safety, right?
You're some kid in the ghetto.
You're going to get your ass kicked.
You want a gang to back you up against the rival gangs.
Or if you get killed, you want people to know your gang's going to avenge you, right?
It's a sense of belonging in a larger group that guarantees you violent protection.
Well, guess what, folks?
The United States government is our gang.
It's supposed to be our gang.
It's supposed to be there to crush the other gangs and to fight the other gangs and to protect the gang members, the American citizens, from exploitation and abuse from people outside the gang.
I honestly shudder at the thought of an alternative universe where I just did what my doctor told me and just filled that prescription like a good boy and started taking statin drugs.
And sadly, this is the story of millions of Americans, which is why I'm making this report to help arm you with an alternative perspective backed by science that gets deliberately ignored in service of corporate greed.
So share this report, but most importantly, do your own research.
I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls.
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
1877-789-2539.
Now, of course, whenever there's some sort of announcement about the InfoWars lawsuit, you always get a lot of people commenting on my ex, claiming that it's all fake, claim that we're all actors.
There's awesome big show we put on for you.
It's like, do you really think?
I don't know.
I think you watched half of a half of a half of one of our shows.
I think you could watch our shows for 10 minutes and it should be excruciatingly obvious that there is no, there is, there's no teleprompter, there's no script, there's no one telling me what to say or what to think or what to cover or what to show or who to talk to.
And guess what?
If you think that there are, call in.
Prove yourself wrong.
That's my message, everybody.
Saw somebody today.
Your boss is an actor and you are too.
Well, call in and tell me that.
Call in and tell me that.
It'd be kind of weird, wouldn't it?
Where this big fake thing that you, a doubter, could call in and talk directly to me and get my immediate, unfiltered, impossible to orchestrate or manipulate response.
That'd be kind of weird, isn't it?
So I say whatever the hell I want, whatever the hell I'm thinking, at whatever particular moment I'm thinking it.
And then we open up phone lines and you get to call in.
If you think what I'm saying is wrong or stupid, then you can call in and humiliate me live on air.
That's the risk I take every time I open up the phone lines.
As maybe, maybe I've been a complete idiot about something.
Someone's going to call in and smack me down and make me look foolish.
Or if I'm lying about something, they could expose my lies.
The trick is, I don't lie and I'm right about everything.
So it's fine.
I open up the phone lines and you can call in.
And if you disagree, I'll just prove you wrong.
And then we can get back to covering the news and you can get back to, you know, seething.
Okay.
So call in 1-877-789-2539.
And if you think what we do is good, call in.
If you think what we do is bad and then you want to expose us.
Everything about InfoWars is, we tell you the truth.
I mean, people even asked me about stuff going on.
And I'm like, all I know is what Alex says on his show because we watch his show and that's how we learn a lot of times how it's going on in our company.
People are like, does Alex ever tell you what to, I'm like, just watch his show.
Watch his show.
And whenever Alex is like, you know, some of the other hosts talk about Israel way too much.
I'm like, all right, Alex, I get it.
It's on his show that he tells me that.
Like, that's how open our communication is behind the scenes.
There is no behind the scenes communication.
It happens on air.
We genuinely could not be more open, more upfront.
And hell, you don't even have to take our word for it unless you think we somehow are in cahoots with and in coordination with like a whole cacophony of like federal judges and lawyers from the biggest law firms that you know are contracted to the democrats 90 of the time and and serve as hillary clinton's personal lawyers you think they're on our team you think they like us think we're all playing a big game together i get it some people they learn about how much fakeness
and fraudulence there is in this world, and suddenly everything must be fake.
Everything must be bad.
Everyone who seems good must be a fed.
Like, unless you have the clarity and the discernment to actually judge things for yourself, I don't know how you're going to acknowledge reality.
I don't know how you're going to come to terms with reality.
And if you think I'm full of it, call in and tell me why I dare you.
I triple dog dare you.
Do you think I would have that level of confidence if I had anything in my life or anything on the show that I was worried was going to be brought up?
Some secret, some lie that I've told.
It doesn't exist, so it just could come at me.
It's infuriating.
especially when it's like it's so obvious who the bad guys are.
It's so obvious who the controlled outlets are.
To be honest, it's most of the other ones.
But for those of you that get it, for those of you that can see through this, obviously, that's the vast majority of our audience.
Because they actually, if you've found Infowars and you actually can listen to us and understand what we're saying and it resonates with you, then I don't have to.
I'm not talking to you, obviously.
I hope that you can support us by going to thealexjonesstore.com and keeping us on the air and in the fight.
Because again, it's very simple.
And we have absolutely no corporation telling us what to say, no ad department making sure that our message aligns with our sponsors.
All of our articles, download them, print them out, share them, put them on flyers, post the videos yourself, make money on X by getting a lot of views.
All of it's free.
And we promise we're going to do our best and try our hardest to tell the truth and to figure out what's really going on, to share with you the conclusions we've come to.
And if you appreciate that and you think we do a good job and you want us to stay on air, you'll go to the alexjonestore.com.
You'll purchase a product and that keeps us on the air.
And that's as deep as this goes, folks.
So if we don't do our job, if we don't satisfy you with our coverage, then you won't go to the store.
So we're incentivized to just be truthful and write and support our fundamental beliefs and uphold the values of 1776.
And in return, all we ask is that you contribute to our efforts by going to the alexjonesstore.com.
And then you get a fantastic product that works really well and is top of the line and is a bestseller anyway, you know, in whole foods or, you know, on the supplement aisle of your grocery store or the GNC or wherever else you get supplements because everybody understands now that vitamins and supplementation is not just good and a great way to maintain health and mental clarity and everything else that's constantly bombarded by the toxic poisons in our chemical chemicals in our food and
Everybody gets that supplementation is really a necessity at this point with the complete denuding of our vegetables and fruit and everything else because of the scientific abominations that they use to grow this sort of stuff.
So you're not getting the vitamins and minerals you need through your food.
So you need to be supplementing.
And we get the best on the market and we offer it to you.
So it really is a 360 win, a 180 win, I like to say, or a 1080 win, rather.
It's a whirlwind of victory.
We're just spinning and spinning around in victory because we all win when you go to the alexjonesstore.com.
We get to keep telling the truth.
You get a fantastic product and join us in this fight.
And together we take down the globalists and try desperately to claw back some semblance of normalcy from this world gone absolutely and utterly insane.
Speaking of, here's a headline from the New York Times.
And again, you know, just like everything, it's like, you know, a lot of the left, they have these activist movements that Out of necessity for their own existence, they have to perpetuate the thing that they claim to fight, right?
And this is true sort of across the board.
This is the classic argument about big pharma, where they it's not a profitable business venture to cure diseases, it's a profitable business venture to keep the disease around so you can continually treat the person with the disease, right?
If you're a gay rights activist group and you, your entire existence is trying to get gay marriage on the table and then it you succeed, then by all rights, you should go away then.
But they don't want to go away.
They want to keep their power, they want to keep their influence, they want to keep making money off the grift.
So they shift the goalposts and they go, well, now it's about gay books in elementary schools.
They just have to keep moving it and keep finding more oppression to fight or else they go away.
I don't want to have to be here.
I don't want to have to do what I do.
I shouldn't have to do what I do.
My ultimate goal is to have an America where you don't need an InfoWars.
You don't need somebody sitting up here telling you what is obvious and observable and apparent to anybody with an IQ over 100.
But unfortunately, we're in a world now where New York Times writes headlines like this.
We used to think the military would stand up to Trump.
We were wrong.
We used to think the military would stand up to Trump.
We were wrong.
We wanted a military coup to overthrow the duly elected government of this country, but we failed.
That's what they're saying.
The military did stand up to Trump.
General Milley committed treason out in the open in 2021.
General Milley said while Donald Trump was the commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces that he refused to follow his orders.
He was contacting our enemies and undermining Trump's foreign policy by communicating directly and contradicting the president with his Chinese counterparts.
The U.S. military did overthrow Trump in 2021 with Nancy Pelosi, usurping powers designated to Donald Trump and Donald Trump alone as U.S. president under the Constitution.
Duly elected, unimpeached, perfectly valid in every possible sense of the word.
And yet they openly went on TV and said, Yeah, we're going to take the nuclear football from him.
That's ours now.
There's no legal ability for them to do that.
They just did it.
So I wish I didn't have to be here to explain the elementary concept of a military coup to you people, but apparently people that don't watch InfoWars are getting the literal opposite message than what's being said.
We used to think the military would stand up to Trump.
We used to think that our unelected, you know, cabal of SJW generals would usurp and overthrow the duly elected president.
Why General Milley hasn't been charged and convicted of treason yet?
God only knows.
I mean, is this complicated to anybody?
Is this confusing to anybody?
It's not confusing to me.
It's pretty obvious to me.
The president has certain powers enumerated in the Constitution that are under his purview and his purview alone.
He achieved that by being elected by the Electoral College in a nationwide campaign.
Here come Nancy Pelosi, who the only people that ever voted for her are retards in San Francisco and General Milley, who's never been voted for for anything ever, and has, in fact, routinely displayed his willingness to engage with and cooperate with America's enemies in contravention to the orders of his commander-in-chief.
These two scumbags get together and just decide they get the powers that are reserved for the United States president.
They get to, by fiat, just usurp that power, claim it for their own, and exercise it how they see fit, regardless of the will of the people.
That's treason, folks.
What else is it?
It's sedition and it's treason.
So why are they still walking around?
So I wish, I pray for a world where the New York Times doesn't feel comfortable writing this headline.
I wish we lived in a world where when people saw a headline said, we want the military to overthrow Trump, they had the same level of reaction and outrage and revulsion that apparently they feel when the National Guard has to stop crime in D.C. because the local police refuse to do so and
were caught fabricating crime numbers to present the perception, the illusion that crime was down.
How can you have this population that is so like hysterically primed to see fascism and everything?
And yet they went along with the COVID lockdowns.
They went along with the vaccine mandates.
They went along with the shock and awe campaign from the federal government to arrest high-profile right-wing activists who weren't even at the Capitol on just on January 6th, 2021 in a form of psychological warfare against Republicans in this country.
And again, it sucks because it makes you feel like an idiot for having principles.
That's really what it is at the end of the day.
It makes you feel like a sucker for actually believing things and actually having foundational beliefs about what this country is supposed to be and what the purpose of our government is.
It makes you feel like a sucker.
It'd be a hell of a lot easier just to be a vengeful hypocrite like the Democrats are.
It'd be very easy.
Be very, very easy to just suppress your morality and just engage in the doggy dog conflict.
Now we don't do that.
So when Kathy Hochel puts National Guard soldiers in the subway, we say that this is wrong.
We shouldn't have to have soldiers in our subway.
We have local police for this.
They should just enforce this.
We don't want the military, you know, scanning everybody that goes into the subway, searching through their bags, hanging around on corners with machine guns.
We don't want to live in an occupied country under military supervision.
We can say that and we can say, but unfortunately, the Democrats refuse to just uphold basic law and order.
So they forced our hand.
We have to do this now.
Luckily for you, idiots, we actually do have principles.
We actually do believe what we say.
And we are concerned about the growth of the militarized police forces and the power of the federal government.
And so while we are being forced to do this, while we're being, you know, while it's being required of us to use the federal government to patch up the holes in the facade that the Democrats have taken a sledgehammer to, we also are very concerned about overreach and we're concerned about abuse of that authority.
And so we'll keep an eye on things and make sure it doesn't become the enforcement arm of some arbitrary dictatorship, but rather actually being used to deal with a street-level crime that law enforcement refuses to.
But wouldn't it be easy?
Wouldn't it be easy at nights to just pretend like we didn't have any care and just go, yeah, this isn't fascism?
No, you just have to shut up and do what the soldiers say.
Yeah, it'd be easy.
And by the way, I mean, sometimes they go too far and they realize it and they have to pull back, right?
So this article, the New York Times, maybe they didn't realize how it sounded at first when they published it.
This is sort of a regular thing, is they publish a headline with something like, we used to think the military would stand up to Trump, but we were wrong.
That is, we used to think that the military would perform a coup against Trump and usurp the power, you know, duly contributed to or duly assigned to the president for themselves.
But we were wrong.
We were wrong.
But then they changed the headline.
That headline's the same still.
But the headline they changed it to, if I could find it, it's weird.
The headlines, they change around.
They switch around.
But the New York Times changed the headline to something like, I'll find it exactly.
They're basically like, Trump's trod the danger of Trump in the military.
No, no, they changed the headline to something else.
Less objectionable, less obvious as to what they're actually saying.
Yeah, how the military became another instrument of Trump's power.
That's what they changed the headline to.
So the first headline was, we thought the military would stand up to Trump.
We were wrong.
I'm like, oh, gee, that sounds like we're advocating for a military coup because we are.
Let's change it to how the military became an instrument of Trump's power.
Like literally in the same article, they switched the headline to reveal to you exactly how inverted their worldview is.
Where they went from saying, you know, the military, it'd be bad for the, or, you know, it'd be good for the military to stand up to Trump to, oh my God, they're not standing up to Trump.
So now it's bad that Trump has control of the military.
By ordering 800 National Guard troops to Washington on the pretext of an illusory crime wave.
All right, we're going to have to do this.
We got to do this now.
We got to do this for the New York Times, the gray old bitch.
We got to do this for the freaking national paper of record.
Let's go through and remove all of the nonsense and see if we can't glean reality from this.
By ordering 800 National Guard troops to Washington on the pretext of an illusion, President Trump has further dragged the U.S. military into domestic law enforcement.
Okay, again, this is just President Trump.
We can't even remove this to make it make sense.
And a move credibly perceived as an ominous test case.
I guess I mean, actually, now that I think about it, I can't even do it to this article because the whole article is fake.
I just have to erase everything.
This continues what the administration started in California as part of its deportation efforts.
All right, so we'll just go with that.
By ordering 800 National Guard troops to Washington, blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, blank.
This continues what the administration started in California as part of the deportation efforts.
Unfortunately, well, I'll just erase that word right off the bat.
Since all of these words are not giving you any more information, they're not actually providing any clarity.
They're just informing you how you're supposed to feel about this before they've told you the thing you're supposed to feel about.
Though we and others had hoped the military would only respond to calls to action in American cities and states kicking and screaming, we no longer expect resistance from that institution.
We'd hoped that the military would only respond to calls to action.
They're not calls to action you moron.
They're orders from your commander-in-chief.
Well, we expected the army to disobey the commander-in-chief when we asked them to.
They're instead following orders and adhering to the oath they took.
Once, perhaps, traditionalist officers may have leaned on protocol and refused to heed a lawless order taking inspiration from the generals, Mark Milley and James Mattis, who resisted the uprooting of established military standards.
James Mattis and Mark Milley should be in prison for treason.
The Democrats behave in a way that is utterly unhinged, completely erratic, totally unconstitutional, borderline illegal, and certainly motivated by ideological or political gamesmanship and has absolutely nothing to do with the reasons that they give for whatever policy they're pursuing.
And this is treated by the media as, at the worst, benign, but for most of the time, as an absolute good.
And opposing it is inexplicable and bizarre.
And why would you ever be against this?
Aren't you for togetherness?
While they tear down your statue and burn your library to the ground.
And then Republicans come in and just try to set things to right.
And then the media explodes in claims of fascism, tyranny, dictatorship.
Over and over and over and over again, it's the exact same cycle, right?
It's happening now with Texas and California, where Texas has these incredibly gerrymandered districts that are completely ridiculous, that flagrantly violate the orders from the federal government about how the districts should be composed.
On top of that, Texas has had a massive influx of population over just the last few years, meaning that the congressional districts, as they were, were completely inadequate and inaccurate and unfair.
You had some congressional districts with 800,000 people, others with 400,000 people.
It was totally nonsense.
Racial divisions being exploited.
And so you got the federal government reaching out to Texas and saying, hey, you're going to have a midterm legislative session here.
You should redistrict to make it more fair for the next round.
The Democrats see that and go, okay, then we're going to gerrymander our districts.
So the districts already were gerrymandered in Texas.
And in response, California says, Texas is cheating, so we're going to cheat.
Now we're going to reorganize our congressional districts explicitly to give us the best benefit and to benefit Democrats and to eliminate red congressional districts.
Now, a couple things that are absurd about this, and Gavin Newsom's going to make a big statement about this today, apparently.
The absurd things about this are: one, the idea that California would ever go red anyway.
Like, what are what?
They're reorganizing, but why?
Give Nancy Pelosi more power to give Adam Schiff more power?
Like, okay, that's absolutely.
I guess he's a senator, but regardless, that doesn't even make sense.
So it's like, okay, what are you even reorganizing to do?
You're all Democrats anyway.
So there's actually no point to even doing this other than to put on a show for everybody because nothing you do is legitimately for the people under your authority.
It's all just games.
It's all just play acting to boost your profile before running for president.
On top of that, obviously the whole thing is predicated on is a gigantic farce.
And honestly, it just goes on and on.
But it's the same feedback loop.
It's the same continual interchange between Republicans and Democrats.
Republicans try to do just very normal things that are not even exceptional.
Like, they aren't even out of the ordinary, let alone like something that should cause five alarm fires.
And yet, it's true as if it's cheating.
It's just the same thing over and over.
Like, here, these are the districts as existed before the redistricting in Texas.
Okay?
This is what they're trying to protect.
This is what they're saying.
Don't mess with it.
They're trying to gerrymander.
Yeah, that's one.
Let's go to the next here.
Here's the other one.
Oh, that's not gerrymandered at all, is it?
No, that's perfectly normal and reasonable.
Oh, what about this one?
Oh, yeah, totally normal, right?
It's a gigantic area with a big chunk right out of the middle of it.
A little weird arm to the side, a couple weird arms to the left.
So, again, they look at this and go, you better not gerrymander this.
Now, the only district that is even reasonable is this one, but even it has a weird little jog out and a weird little like unconnected, non-contiguous island of representation, as well as this little weird carve-out in there.
So, even that's kind of weird and not exactly right.
But again, to look at that and go, these are perfectly valid, and any attempt to change these is cheating, and you're gerrymandering.
It's completely ridiculous, but whatever.
They make the false claim, and then they act on that false claim, and then they call you a fascist for wanting to resist it.
Same thing's happening in the Smithsonian.
They go in and explicitly go, We are removing displays we don't like, and we're changing the entire Smithsonian to push our ideology and our ideology alone.
And it's one of hatred and division and racial totem pole exercise.
And so, Trump goes, Hey, just get back to history.
Just tell the story of our nation and have national pride while you do it.
You are a national museum.
Act like it.
And the Democrats are just like, oh no, fascism.
Guys, it's fascism.
Trump administration to review 19 Smithsonian museums to ensure exhibits are patriotic.
Why wouldn't they be?
Why the hell do we allow our national museum to display anything other than patriotism?
The American National Museum is going to spend its time and our taxpayer money to tear down our own country.
Who the hell would allow that?
Why do we allow it?
Now, if Trump really wanted to do something good, he'd unveil the Nephilim bones that are kept in the basement.
But I doubt he's going to do that.
And people are even there like, oh, but what about the African American Museum?
That ugly assault on the eyes that sits next to the beautiful marble facades of the classic Smithsonian Air and Space Museum and Natural History Museum.
And they're worried that Trump is going to do something.
He's going to remove important information or something.
Here's what I say we do.
Out of a sense of fairness.
Okay.
Just a few years ago, there's a statue on the Washington, D.C. mall of Martin Luther King Jr.
Okay, here's what we do: we tear it down.
Let's tear down the statue of Martin Luther King Jr.
Let's deface it.
Let's smash it.
Let's put a noose around its neck.
And then let's lay that in the floor of the foyer of the African American Museum in order to honor it.
What a weird suggestion for me to make.
Why would I even say that?
Why would I say that?
Why would I say to do that?
Doesn't that sound so horrible?
I mean, could you possibly phrase that as somehow respectful for the African-American community?
I mean, now that I say it out loud, maybe that's not the best idea.
Now that I really think about tearing down the MLK statue with a violent mob and covering it in red paint and putting a noose around its neck, I don't know.
I thought that was the way you honored the statue.
But if I say that, it gives you kind of a visceral reaction.
Like if you're a liberal, if you're a leftist, if you're a black person, you'd probably, it's like outrageous, right?
Like, what the heck?
Like, it'd be a very clear symbol to me or to you, like, what I would intend in doing that, right?
But we're told this is new America.
This is how you celebrate things, right?
Isn't this how you celebrate things?
Because right now, I don't know if you know this, the various statues that were torn down and defaced and vandalized during the 2020 Summer of Love riots are being left in a state of desecration on the floor of museums for people to come and gloat over and engage in a humiliation ritual.
And we have some images of this, actually.
I'll see if I can see if I can full screen some of these.
Here's a statue of Jefferson Davis who used to sit atop a rotunda in the city of Richmond, and it is now in a museum lying in its desecrated, destroyed, humiliated state as a symbol of the desecration of our history and the humiliation of our past and the hatred for historical white America that was sort of embodied in that 2020 summer.
And all of these, apparently, all of these are going to go on a big display in California.
Jefferson Davis statue heads to Los Angeles.
August 17th is the last day that the damaged Jefferson Davis statue will be on display at the Valentine Museum, which is where it is now.
Not in a way that is preserved to respect the history that it represents.
That's what we were told.
We were told that these statues being torn down would be just, you know, it's not that they hate the statues.
It's just they don't want to be reminded of it every day.
So we'll take down the statues and we'll put them in a museum somewhere because they're historical and we want to, you know, have respect for history.
We want to understand history because we're enlightened liberals.
So we'll put the statue in a museum somewhere so you can still look at it.
Okay.
It's just not going to be, you know, in the face of all the black people that have to see it every day out at the park.
And in reality, what they did was they created a humiliation shrine for it.
They left it defaced and covered in vandalism and left it not even standing, but laying on the ground on the floor of a museum so the people that despise Heritage America, that despise white people, that despise America itself, can come and bask in the humiliation of Jefferson Davis.
They can enjoy the, I don't know, the good feeling they get watching the desecration of things that people actually care about.
So I don't know, until we are putting a noose around MLK and leaving his statue shattered and destroyed and humiliated on the floor of the National African American Museum, I think everybody can shut the hell up about, oh, Trump's messing with history.
Nobody on our side even wants to engage in some sort of sick humiliation ritual with people who have been dead for 100 years.
That's what the left is about, though.
That's who they are.
And it's just seething hatred.
So at this display in Los Angeles, so August 17th is the last day Richmonders can visit the Jefferson Davis statue on display at Valentine.
Again, not even on display.
Humiliated, destroyed.
Like this is what conquering armies do to their enemy generals, right?
It's like the Romans holding a triumph and dragging some Celtic warlord behind a horse while the rest of Rome jeers at him and throws rotten food at him.
That's what they're doing to our ancestors.
That's what they're doing to our heroes.
Tokyo, I don't think for a single second it's about race.
Abraham Lincoln is amongst these humiliated, destroyed, desecrated statues.
Just understand where we are, all right?
Understand where we are.
have this humiliation display up and there's a lot more to get into it I got I got to take calls, but basically they're all being sent to L.A. where there will be a huge display of all of these statues of our heroes, our ancestors, our founding fathers, all destroyed, humiliated, desecrated.
They'll all be laying there for hordes of non-Americans to come and spit on and revel in our humiliation.
And this statue, the Robert E. Lee statue, that was melted down in this display of, you know, cultural genocide that they celebrated, it's been melted down and reforged.
And they're going to be unveiling whatever new abomination has been created out of the ashes of that Robert E. Lee statue.
So they melted it down, despite telling everybody, oh, we're going to be respectful of history.
We just don't want it in our face.
So we just, you know, you've got to have respect for the black people in your town that they don't want to have to see this guy up there every day.
So we'll go put it in a corner somewhere in a museum where we'll preserve the history.
No, instead, they cut his face off.
They filmed it like a snuff film.
They melted it down.
And now they've reforged it into God only knows what sort of disgusting abomination they're going to come out with.
Maybe it'll be a bored-looking black woman looking at her phone.
I mean, that's how most statues are being cast these days.
Yeah, maybe this will be the new Robert E. Lee statue.
It'll be anonymous overweight black woman number 945.
Great.
Wonderful.
How symbolic of our downfall as a society.
Or maybe it'll be, you know, just some disgusting mass.
Whatever it is, it is a transmutation of the spirit of the country from something that is upright and honorable, powerful, and good to some sort of disgusting, inhuman humiliation ritual.
It's a cult ceremony that they'll be doing as they attempt to literally take over, melt down, and reforge Heritage America into whatever abomination that they prefer.
And so that's what's happening.
It's the Laxar.
It's called Monuments.
And yeah, basically they're bringing all of these statues that, for one thing, they don't own and don't have a right to, but have somehow stolen and are now putting on display as a giant menagerie of the conquered by the conquerors.
And we're putting up with this.
And then they're like, but Trump is saying Smithsonian should be patriotic.
Is this fascism?
Well, they have statues of your heroes that they tore down illegally lying on the ground as a humiliation fetish.
They'd send a pretty girl into the bar and during lunchtime and catch workers, union workers, you know, getting drunk and they would brag to the women about.
So it's the same people that are trying to do a sting operation, set people up so they could lose their job.
So I was standing getting a slice of pizza and a girl walked by about five minutes earlier.
The dress was down to her knees.
She was casually dressed, conservatively dressed.
And next thing you know, she walks by again and the dress has like got her ass hanging out of it.
So as I'm eating my slice of pizza, I'm like, oh, yeah.
And then all of a sudden, a guy on a bike who's got a camera in the pouch and the basket on the front.
And then somebody has like a private, what is that called?
Then another gorgeous woman comes up, and I have no idea who this woman is.
Within three minutes, I'm sucking her toes on the bench in front of Hogs and Heffers.
The producer, the correspondent reporter were in shock.
They were like, How do you do that?
And almost like Kramer on Seinfeld has the caborkia, I got the same thing.
I can pick up any chick anywhere, anytime.
And I'm telling you, and that's why they love me.
I'm not nasty.
I'm not rude.
And by the end of the interview, the woman reporting, the hot chick reporting, I feel what I mean is, she said, you know, if I wasn't married, I'd go out on a date.
They have it as transcript where the girl is talking to me, the reporter, and she says, What would happen if your girlfriend or your wife saw you out here, you know, talking to women like this on the street?
I was like, honey, hold up.
First of all, my girlfriend and my wife do not talk.
I've just been noticing you've been talking about APAC and the Israeli lobby a lot, and I think that you're giving them free PR working for Israel as one of their intelligence agents.
So if you think about how corrupt DC is and how much they'd want to get into that money pot, they're going to just dip their toes into a left and right.
Now you're getting all the attention from the local politicians all the way up to state, county.
They're all looking at APAC now going like, what can I do to get some of that APAC money?
I think that's literally the opposite that's happening.
I think now that people are waking up to how much APAC controls our government and how much influence they have, I mean, my whole goal the whole time is to make the outrage or the awareness of APAC be a greater pressure than APAC themselves, right?
So when the congressman or whoever is running for office and they hear APAC wants to meet with you, I want what goes on in their mind to go, hmm, if I take APAC money, it's going to cause a lot of outrage and a lot of people aren't going to vote for me anymore.
And they have to run that calculus.
They have to go, okay, if I take the APAC money, here's what I get.
I get access.
I get good media coverage.
I get money for my campaign.
But on the other hand, I'm going to get raked over the coals by the anti-war people.
I'm going to get called corrupt.
Every town hall I have, people are going to be demanding that I explain my APAC cooperation.
So I want that side of the equation to be heavier and I want it to outweigh the benefits that AIPAC can provide.
And I want to be aware and cognizant and vigilant against the fact that APAC itself recognizes this and is now splintering into sort of shadow organizations.
Like we were talking about with Rex Jones the other day, the Kentucky MAGA PAC, which is just APAC rebranded to be specifically for Kentucky, but to strip it of its Israeli label to hide it from the people involved.
How does any of this comport somebody that is in favor or working for APAC?
I'm telling you their deceptive plans to manipulate politics explicitly so we can counteract and stop them from doing that.
How could you possibly think that that is helping APAC any in any way?
I mean, if I was you, I would probably be talking about what kind of money is going into these pockets and whose coffers is it coming from.
So like maybe, you know, what's going on with Lockheed, Raytheon, and probably Larry Fink and what he's got going on as far as donations to political contributions.
Well, I think I think Larry Fink's political contributions are far from the most powerful influence that he wields.
Again, and I've said the same thing about APAC, right?
How many times have I said it's not even about the money in APAC?
Yes, they provide money and sometimes it can be very large amounts of money, but it's way, way, way more useful to have APAC in your corner because you get good media.
You are able to collaborate with other people by being a part of AIPAC.
It's just in doing so, you become a traitor to the United States and in my opinion, should be kicked out of office.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal.
Third hour is on.
Support us at the AlexJonesStore.com forward slash Harrison if you want to let them know who sent you.
For our callers, I'm sorry I wasn't able to get some more calls.
It's completely my fault.
If you want to hang on the line, I'm going to do a 30-minute segment with Amy Reichert here, and then I'll go back to calls.
So apologies to our callers.
If you want to hold, I'd be happy to go to you on the other side.
But first, I'm very happy to welcome to the show Amy Reichert.
Once again, she is an activist and community organizer based in San Diego.
And I live in crazy California behind enemy lines.
There was a pastor who stood up to Gavin Newsom during COVID, Jack Hibbs.
And he is the one that issued the warning.
He said, California parents, if this dangerous bill, AB 495, which would allow anybody with a sheet of paper to become the guardian of your child, passes, he told California parents, leave, pack up your kids and go.
So Assemblymember Celeste Rodriguez, she's the one that came up with this crazy bill, and it's supposed to protect immigrant children when their parents are deported.
The problem is this bill would apply to all California kids.
So here's how it would work.
Someone could go to the internet, download this piece of paper, and say that they have a mentoring relationship or caregiver relationship with your child.
And they do have to sign under penalty of perjury, but here's the catch.
They can go into your child's school, say that they are now your child's guardian, and the school doesn't have to check for ID.
They don't have to contact the parents.
There's no background checks at all.
And we all know that people lie in family court about custody issues.
So why wouldn't a predator use the loophole here and steal your child?
I mean, it's just, it's opening up for so much exploitation, and it's not even solving a problem that really exists, right?
I mean, I guess this is fighting family separation, but it's actually increasing family separation because the parents are being deported and the kids are staying home.
It's just, this is just utter, utter nonsense, and people need to be aware of it.
Anybody listening to my voice, especially if you have friends or family in California, send people information about this.
And hell, don't even send it from us.
Go find the official like court document.
Go find the actual law.
Go find the actual reporting from mainstream sources.
This really is what's going on.
Make people in California aware of it and stand up against it.
So you've organized a protest that'll be happening the 19th of August at 1 p.m.
And, you know, obviously this just goes in line with sort of the rest of what we've seen happen in California.
And usually it's predicated on transgenderism.
This time they're using immigration.
I was going to say slowly, but surely.
It's not even slow, though.
They are taking a hatchet to parental rights in California to the extent that like, you know, you're just going to be able to take your kid for whatever reason that they, you know, claim that you, you don't go along with their transition.
Well, they're going to take your kid away and give them to somebody who does.
Some guy, you know, becomes friends with your kids and convince them that, you know, you'd be happier with me than with your family.
They get to sign a piece of paper and have your child.
If you think what we're saying here sounds crazy, go read it.
Go read it for yourself.
The truth is AB 495 opens the door for adults who are not the child's legal guardian and may not even be related to gain temporary custody with little more than a signature.
This allows an adult, including a non-relative with legal connection to the family, to assume broad authority over a child by signing a caregiver affidavit, no court hearing, no background check, no oversight.
This requires schools and licensed child care providers to implement policies that limit cooperation with immigration enforcement, even when the safety or identity of a child is in question.
It blocks schools and child care staff from gathering or reporting information related to a child's immigrant status or the legitimacy of custody arrangements.
So again, you know, I could see this.
You brought up custody disputes, and it's a very common thing.
Like most kidnappings in this country, things sort of categorized as kidnappings, are in fact like parents who don't have custody of their kid trying to get their kid back.
Like most of the time you see an Amber alert, it's because kid's father, the parents are divorced, the father's not supposed to have custody, but he picks the kid up from school and drives away and the mom wants to find out where the kid went.
I can see this being used, you know, for that immediately.
I imagine if you're a father who's in the family court and you're not able to see your kid and you can go to your friend and go, hey, you just signed this.
You can go get my daughter out and then I can get her and we can run away and then their mom won't know where she went.
I mean, the availability of abuse in this bill is like endless.
And you know how it's going to work.
It's going to be schools that just, they don't know what the hell is going on.
And they're presented with a legal paper that says, I am this kid's guardian.
They don't have the wherewithal or ability or, you know, right to investigate that or question that.
They're given a court paper saying this person is the kid's guardian.
And the scope of the assumed authority is staggering.
Once the affidavit is accepted, the caregiver may be able to enroll the child in school, access medical care on their behalf, and even consent to gender-related interventions and other serious procedures, all without a parent's knowledge or consent.
And, you know, again, just to associate to the trans stuff, where it's like, why would you open this vulnerability?
Why would you take a system that is not perfect, but it's established to try to make sure that kids aren't kidnapped from school?
It's got to be a parent and a guardian that picks them up.
Like, why would you want to mess with that and open the possibility that it's abused?
And to me, I'm thinking of like trans bathrooms, where it's like, okay, sure.
Most of the time, sure, maybe a trans person will go into the bathroom and they'll use it and leave and nobody will know any better.
Like, okay, fine.
Most of the time it won't work.
But why would you want to open the possibility of some weird pervert can just put on a dress and go spy on your child in the locker room if they want to?
Because somebody's going to do that.
Somebody is going to take advantage of that vulnerability and they're going to hurt children.
So why open this vulnerability?
How could this possibly be worth it?
And of course, you're racist if you disagree is their argument, I guess.
That's that's a name that summons some pretty horrific images to my mind.
So so again, parents need to know about this.
They need to be aware of this.
And the pastor, I completely agree, is like, it's just not even worth it to see how this goes.
I mean, it is completely legally possible that this system is abused to the extent that your child is given away to a stranger and the school hides that information from you.
And that's crazy.
And it's just not even worth the risk.
It's like playing a Russian roulette and the pastor saying, don't play, get the hell out of California.
So it's already been passed by assembly and now it's going through committee and it will go through committee next week through the, I believe, the financial procurement committee, which is just a technicality.
But long story short, it still has to go in front of the state senate and be passed.
And then, of course, notoriously be signed by Gavin Newsom, who wants to run for president.
Well, yeah, whether he admits it or not, clearly that's what all of his political activity is geared towards now, not for serving the Californian people or upholding the oath of office he took, but rather just positioning himself to be the next Kamala Harris, I guess.
And I guess Kamala Harris will replace him.
So they'll swap spots.
He'll be the establishment choice for president and she'll be the governor of California.
And America and California will both suffer in accordance.
Right now, apparently he is announcing a redistricting plan in California.
Have you heard anything about this and what's your take on Gavin Newsom punishing Texas by gerrymandering his own state?
And I have some inside information that I think is going to make people really hopeful.
So on one hand, Gavin Newsom and the Democrats want to, we only have nine Republican congressional seats in California, and they want to whittle that down to four, right, with this redistricting map.
So here's the hope that's on the horizon.
I hear there's $100 million ready to come in to fight this redistricting because it will go to a special election.
So of course, California is going to spend $20 million on an election that we can't afford to fight Trump.
But long story short, it needs two-thirds of a vote to pass.
And we believe that Gavin Newsom will lose at the polls.
And of course, you know, Trump is talking about wanting to redo the census and not count illegal immigrants.
And that in and of itself would deprive California of probably a lot of seats because the system that we're in now rewards states for breaking the law.
If you have a lot of illegal immigrants that you allow to stay in your country and exploit the American people, you're actually rewarded with extra congressional seats for your citizens.
Completely unfair.
I mean, what would that do to California?
How would that play into the mix if Trump does this, you know, redoes a census and ends up taking a bunch of seats away from California?
So right now, the population of California is in decline.
So there are more people taking U-Hauls and moving out of the state than people moving in.
But under Biden, there was a population bump.
But guess where that population bump came from?
They call it international migration, of course.
Of course, we know them as people who are faking asylum or people who entered the country illegally.
So what we did see, even with that bump of people coming in who are not illegal, faking asylum, there are still more people who are leaving California, fleeing for the red states.
So yeah, we're on track to actually lose a congressional seat in 2030, even with this illegal immigration.
Well, thank you for showing B-roll of the fires that are happening here in California.
And the truth of the matter is, is Gavin Newsom is trying his best to burn down our state, but people are fighting back.
What we saw in the November 2024 presidential election was a shift to the red in California, with many counties actually flipping red that were previously blue.
People were so disgusted.
Democrats were disgusted with Kamala Harris.
2 million California Democrats stayed home, didn't even vote blue, right?
So you saw traditionally blue counties like Imperial County, which is heavily Latino, flip red.
So we need voter ID.
And really, we're not there yet.
We're still a deep blue state.
I don't want to mislead anybody, but slowly but surely, by ringing the bell on parental issues like this, we're taking territory back.
And again, you say, you say parental issues like this because this is far from the only attempt to separate children from their parents.
And it seems like they're getting away with it in certain cases.
In other cases, people are finding out and stopping it from being implemented or being made actionable.
Obviously, that's what you're attempting here.
Again, my guest is Amy Reichert.
You can follow her on X at Amy4San Diego.
And it's all spelled out Amy4San Diego.
And the protest is August 19th, 1 p.m.
Pacific, stop AB 495.
And you can search stop AB 495 to find information about that.
How else can people find information about this?
What else can people do?
What about people from outside of California?
How can we contribute to the effort to stop this from being implemented and try to save kids from being exploited by unscrupulous, I don't know, pedophiles or whoever else wants to take advantage of this law to kidnap your children with the complicity of the state?
I mean, what can people in California do and what can we do outside of California?
I'm sorry, restoresanDiego.org is where you go to join that.
I mean, what else is happening in California?
And what do you think the likelihood is that Gavin Newsom becomes the frontrunner for presidency?
Because obviously people have been talking about that for a while.
He clearly has ambitions in that direction.
He's a good-looking white guy with a beautiful family.
I mean, if the Democrats want to claim back some of the vibe that they've lost recently, I think he's their guy, even though to us, he looks like a guy from American Cycle.
I mean, literally, he looks like an insane person, constantly twitching and writhing around.
But Democrats, they love this guy, even though by identity, they're supposed to hate him.
But trying to find consistency in Democratic beliefs is a fool's errand.
What do you think the likelihood is that Gavin Newsom runs for president and succeeds?
You know, that's interesting because it seems like the left is going farther and farther left, as they always do.
And we've seen the charts where, you know, it shows the change from 2000 to 2020.
And you see the left moves way left.
The right moved a little bit right, but the left went way left.
But it's interesting that he's moving towards the middle.
I mean, it shows the power that, you know, the conservative ideas have that they're having to come towards us and not go far to the left.
But in a way, that's almost, it's like the people on the far left, the AOC types are so far out there that I bet about a lot of Democrats would love to vote for Gavin Newsom just because they're like, oh, finally, it's not a crazy socialist.
And you remember, I mean, all of that is like A-B-tested PR stuff because Beto O'Rourke keeps giving statements where he's dropping the F-bomb like three times.
And you can go back and there's a New York Times article about how the Democrats had some PR firm come in and say, you need to curse more.
You need to be more aggressive.
You need to be less polite.
And so all these guys now, Gavin Newsome, Bedo O'Rourke, they're coming out and they're insulting people and cursing.
They're puppets.
They're literally being told, be more aggressive.
They're like, I'm now more aggressive.
It's all fraudulent.
It's just insane.
Amy Riker, thank you so much for being with us at Amy4 San Diego.
Stop AB 495.
Stop AB 495.
The protest, 1 p.m.
Pacific, August 19th at the Capitol in Sacramento.
I hope you're there because I sure as hell hope this doesn't pass.
All right.
Welcome back, folks.
I'm telling you, I don't know what you don't know if anybody else like appreciates or enjoys as much as I do the irony of the Democratic struggle to remain relevant in that they understand, they realize.
I mean, it has been made unavoidably obvious to them that they're completely inauthentic and that nobody in America trusts them.
And so I'm not even kidding, in response to being told that they have the appearance of a lack of sincerity and that nobody trusts them and that they don't seem like they're real people, they actually hire PR firms to instruct them on how to fake sincerity.
I mean, it's hilarious.
It's the joke I kept making during Kamal Harris's candidacy, right?
You're too fake.
We've got to figure out how to fake realness.
And it's like, do you not understand the incompatibility there?
Can you not see the irony of that statement?
And so Democrats are doing this.
And what they've decided, this is the lesson they've learned.
Now, if I'm a Democrat, the lesson I'm learning from the last little while is let's stop being petulant, authoritarian, tyrannical, hateful morons.
That would be the position I would want to go on.
I'd say, hey, you want to stop being blown out of the water every possible chance you open your mouth?
Oh, Pocahontas really trying to be authentic for everybody.
But just understand, like, this is the mind of the Democrats.
This is the world they live in.
You know, Chuck Schumer hires some PR firm, probably owned by his brother or whatever, pays him a million dollars out of the campaign funds.
They come back going, people think you're out of touch.
They think you are like an alien of some sort.
They couldn't possibly imagine you doing something as mundane as taking out the trash because you seem like you are disconnected from humanity on a fundamental level.
And so instead of being like, man, am I disconnected from, like, maybe I should just like go and try to reconnect with humanity.
Maybe I can just, you know, take a vacation, go incognito, and like try to reconnect.
Because, I mean, these people are, I mean, it's the, it's the, you know, arrested development joke.
What could a banana cost?
10 bucks?
They're so out of touch.
Like they just have literally no idea.
Or George Bush during his administration going, oh, what's this interesting machine?
And it's the person being like, the barcode scanner at the grocery store?
You don't know what this is?
These people don't know.
They aren't people.
They aren't people.
They're a conglomeration of PR advice.
And they can't even, they're so disconnected, even with the advice, even with the instructions.
Hey, people think you're a disconnected freak, Chuck Schumer.
People think you're an absolute bizarre inhuman freak, Chuck Schumer.
Maybe, like, just take a picture of yourself grilling.
Like, try to do something that's just basic humanity.
Like, try just not look like a vampire in a photo for once, and maybe that'll reconnect to people.
unidentified
And so he's like, all right, I'll put some raw meat on the unlit grill and some raw cheese.
Or he can just actually be himself, in which case, everybody would hate him.
Think about how much people hate the Democrats now.
And this is them like trying so hard to cover up who they really are, trying desperately to put across a fabricated disguise of normalcy and relatability.
And they are still this out of touch.
So that's basically where we're at.
So again, it's not me speculating or anything.
Potty mouth.
Democrats have put new fighting words.
We can't put in the have some new fighting words that we can't put in this headline.
Profanity isn't new in politics, but it's reaching new heights on the left.
Oh, why?
Because you're getting so pissed off.
They're the real deal.
I mean, this was a study that came out a long time ago that it basically just said the more you curse, the more authentic people think that you are.
Because in a way, it's true.
Because, you know, in an interpersonal level, you know, somebody's saying, gee, I'm not very happy with the way this worked out.
And I'd like it to go a different way.
That doesn't sound very sincere compared to just like, this is effing stupid.
It's like, wow, that guy really means it.
That first guy trying to sort of tiptoe around it.
That doesn't stop.
But the guy that just yelled the F word and is pissed.
Yeah, that guy's the real deal.
On interpersonal level, this works.
I don't think it works with politicians.
And I think it's going to really get old very, very fast.
Now, Donald Trump's probably the most foul-mouthed politician in public, at least, right?
Politicians in the background are, you know, whatever.
April 24th, 2017, S-Talking is Democrats' new strategy.
So they've been trying this for a while, have they?
Well, this was their big push from Washington Post.
I believe it was in, yeah, July.
So, I mean, this was last month, July 17th, one month ago.
Democrats try a new tone, less scripted, more cursing, trumpier insults.
Party leaders are swearing more, recording more direct-to-camera videos, and trying to project an authenticity many voters have come to associate with Trump.
Yes, that's right, folks.
They are trying to fake their authenticity with everything they've got.
How they're doing that?
They're dropping the F-bomb.
Now, Trump's one of the most foul-mouthed politicians in public ever.
And I can think of about two or three examples where he's cursed in public.
He says BS sometimes, but like a lot of the stuff that he's blamed for, it's like a private conversation that somebody leaks, right?
The S-hole comments, right?
We don't want people coming from shithole countries.
And then, you know, CNN's up there going, oh, is this, is this an S-hole country?
And it's like, well, he didn't even say that in public.
That was a private conversation that somebody claimed he said.
We don't know if he really said it, but I bet he did because it is true and he's a truth teller.
But like, it's going to get old really fast.
Really fast.
I mean, Beto O'Rourke, every time he's interviewed now, he drops a couple F-bombs.
Again, there's just something inhuman about Democrats.
It's like they genuinely don't get humanity.
Curse words are supposed to be exclamation points, supposed to be reserved for a time where it's you really need to make that extra punch.
But they're just going to start dropping it in every interview they do now, is what's going to happen.
And it's just going to be like a regular thing.
And I mean, it's going to be like the South Park episode, the South Park episode where they were allowed to say shit and the world was cursed because they're curse words.
There's something about that.
There's something metaphysical happening here where like our politics are going to devolve into a conversation that like we're not going to be allowed to have children watch.
Or children are just going to start cursing all the time anyway, which is kind of what's happening.
Regardless, the point of all of this is to say that every, like you're going to start seeing it all the time now.
And just know, every time you hear the Democrats being authentic by doing things like cursing, what that should translate in your mind into is, oh, look, they're faking authenticity.
Oh, look, they're following the instructions of their PR firm to seem more authentic because of just how inauthentic they really are.
So here's Chuck Schumer.
Old man Schumer dropping the F-bomb because he's just like the foul-mouthed trucker down at the truck stop, old Chuck Schumer.
And he just finished eating his raw hamburger meat with his cheese.
He's playing Pokemon Go or whatever the kids are doing these days.
They have willingly allowed themselves and their bodies to be possessed by this spirit of public relations, basically.
And it's just, you know, it's one thing if it's like, hey, the PR firm has A-B tested it, and they say that the red tie makes you really seem imposing.
Right?
That type of stuff I can understand.
That type of stuff is like, well, people really respond to the red tie.
You know, people really liked when you did this.
People really liked when you did that.
But I can't imagine somebody coming in and being like, let me tell you the way that you're going to form your sentences from now on.
You're going to change the entire style that you talk just to try to fake authenticity.
Like, honestly, I don't understand how you go along with that unless you are like a literal robot.
Here's Chuck Schumer dropping the F-bomb because he's a cool kid like that.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Have you heard?
Do you think that he's going to end up going to Congress?
Because he can't revoke complete home rule authority for D.C. without actually going to Congress first.
He can't even extend this past 30 days without going to you all first.
Have you heard that that's what he plans on doing?
And if he went to Congress and said, you know what, there's this crime emergency.
They're literally taking their very word choice is not their own.
It is an amalgamation of what they think America wants because they aren't real people.
They aren't genuine human beings on any possible level.
Their mind, their thoughts, their words, their actions, their behavior, what they support, it means nothing to them other than a route to power and a path towards tricking you into supporting them.
And I wish they would just tell the truth, please.
Please just tell the truth and be who you really are.
Because we can see it anyway, and you're only making it worse.
It's got to your calls.
Chase in Canada has called in.
Chase in Canada.
I think you're talking about overdosing on red pills, perhaps.
Yeah, I told in back when you were talking about how much Indian account, et cetera.
And I just, I was glad that that guy called in right before you went to your guest and said you were feeding the fires.
And then, you know, the logical thing to ask after that, you said, you asked, well, then what do we do?
We just not say anything.
And, you know, so I think it's symptomatic that, you know, people start to wake up to, you know, corruption and government, et cetera, and all the bad things going on.
And so during that process, people start to, you know, they learn a bit on their own and then they start, you know, attacking this person, that person for, you know, not having the, you know, exact same paradigm.
And then that just becomes like blood in the water and a feeding ground for the box and the all this like stake event stuff that happens that is kind of used to polarize and kind of kick the wasp nest and keep us in a state of disorganization and a state of not being consensus.
Like the right and the left right now are in a consensus about Palestine, for example, and you see like a turn up of the volume of all these other side issues.
And, you know, I think it's a process to figure out how and when you're being manipulated.
And then, you know, the best way forward, I think, is to order to keep things constructive, that take more of a humble stance.
Like that guy, you know, he mentioned something about following the money and being paid off, et cetera.
That's good.
So yeah, go ahead and do that, you know, and like, absolutely.
When people start to step into that arena and do what you're doing, Harris, is that, you know, they're going to, it is going to be a humbling experience when you step into that.
Well, and look, the thing you have to understand is that and then we try to inform people, like people have been through this before, right?
You got to find voices you can trust.
And it's hard to know who you can trust and who you can't.
Alex Jones, I would say, is one of the people that has proven his bona fides over and over and over and over and over again.
And you can, and we've been through this and we have, we've uncovered these things and we have studied this stuff.
So if you're new to it, you got to find somebody that you can trust that it's not going to lead you down, you know, the wrong path because you're in a vulnerable position when your worldview has been completely upset and overturned.
And again, it's shocking to me that people are still going through this.
They could have gone through COVID and gone through the wars in Iraq and gone through the first Trump administration and the second Trump administration and 2020 and Black Lives Matter.
They go through all that.
And still, you know, to this day, you'll have people going, oh, I just woke up last week.
And it's like, okay, good, good.
But now you're in a vulnerable position, sort of been unmoored from the tether that kept you to the false reality.
You want to moor yourself to actual reality and you got to determine who can who can trust you to guide you on that journey.
However, you're going to have to take the journey on yourself regardless.
And it's about understanding that the people in power are human beings.
Okay.
They have to contend with human will.
Their plans don't always work out correctly.
They get defeated sometimes.
Sometimes they win.
Sometimes they lose.
A lot of times they win.
And a lot of times when they lose, it's treated as a victory by the mainstream media.
But you have to just be grounded.
Be, you know, keep your feet, my saying, feet on the ground, head in the clouds, right?
You got to be able to speculate wildly.
You got to be able to wonder what could possibly be behind this.
Maybe it's something spectacular.
Maybe there really are interdimensional beings.
Maybe, you know, they really are capable of pulling off some massively orchestrated nationwide conspiracy throughout the country.
Or maybe it's one group of people or whatever.
So you got to be able to speculate wildly.
You got to be able to entertain every possibility.
But then you have to pare it down.
You have to go, okay, well, what actually is happening?
What actually does make sense?
And sometimes you don't know.
Sometimes you just go, Jeffrey Epstein and Trump.
We don't really know what's going on there.
We don't know if Trump has been convinced he's in the files or he's been planted in the files or maybe he doesn't care.
We don't actually know, but we can look at the evidence that we do have and we can come to conclusions.
And the conclusions that you come to are not out of the question.
They're not extraordinary.
We don't do conspiracy theories about aliens or Bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster or interdimensional beings or lizard people or any of that crap.
We talk about the actual conspiracies that are documented, that we know are happening, that you can see happening with your own eyes.
You know, this, one of the great examples, I think, is when like all of the right wing suddenly jumped on board the bandwagon of Stuart Rhodes is a fed.
Now, I looked at the evidence.
I'm friends with Stuart Rhodes.
I didn't believe it from the outset, but I hate to be fooled and I'd hate to be telling you people wrong.
So I got to do my research.
I got to do my investigation.
And you've got to be able to go through and read all of the assertions and go, that's not true.
And that's not true.
And this doesn't really make any sense.
And this contradicts what they said earlier.
And then you come to the conclusion, nope, absolutely not.
He is absolutely not a Fed and that doesn't make any sense.
And none of the evidence they presented proves it.
And then, of course, he gets sent to prison for 20 years.
You know, they tried to send him to prison 20 years.
Thank God he was had his sentence commuted.
But regardless, it's like you, I don't know.
I don't even, you just got to be able to do it.
I don't know what to tell you.
I try to give you the weapons you need.
I try to inform you how I do it, but it's not hard.
It's something that you have to learn to do yourself.
And then it's really a very simple matter of like applying intelligence, applying skepticism on both sides, but you'll come to the reality if you do it with clear eyes and a full spectrum understanding.
I think about Nick Fuentez, one of his recent streams was like, you got all these people, you know, saying I'm gay and a fed.
And he's like, and all these people are sort of orbiting around Peter Thiel, who is by default.
I mean, he's a homosexual and he's a fed.
He's a federal contractor and he works with the FBI and he runs CIA companies.
So it's like, but people are going to listen to that and they're going to believe that and they're going to believe the lie about Nick being a fed.
I mean, just look at the evidence.
Look at all of the evidence and come to your own conclusions and read what the claims about him are and then listen to his response and come to your own conclusions.
It's really not that hard.
And when you do that, and I encourage you to do that, don't trust Infowars.
Do your own research.
Don't just listen to what I say and accept it uncritically.
I could be wrong and I want you to tell me if I am.
But regardless, you can trust me to try to be right.
You can trust me to do everything I possibly can to tell you the truth as I see it or tell you that I don't know the truth if I don't know it.
And maybe if you're wondering who's legitimate and who isn't, I suggest humbly that the people that tell you what I just told you are the more trustworthy ones.
And the people that tell you, don't listen, the Ben Shapiros out there that say, don't listen to Alex Jones.
He's a crazy conspiracy theorist.
He blah, blah, blah.
I say, listen to Ben Shapiro so you can clip out the absurd things he says and send them to me and we'll play him on the show and laugh at him because he's a foreign agent because he's a Mossad operative.
He is the Jeffrey Epstein of the conservative commentary sphere.
Do you understand that?
You get what that means?
That Israel can provide money and support and place somebody in a position of power, authority, or prominence with the sole intent and purpose of benefiting their nation.
And that's what Ben Shapiro is playing in his role.
But you should listen to him and that's the conclusion you'll come to.