Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| On July 23, 2025, President Trump signed three executive orders aimed at solidifying U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence, with one specifically targeting the acceleration of data center construction. | ||
| The new policy promotes the use of federal lands, including brownfield and superfund sites. | ||
| Brownfield and superfund sites are basically former industrial sites, generally found in urban areas that are complicated by the potential presence of hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants. | ||
| A $500 billion private sector partnership has already been formed with companies like OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank to construct up to 20 AI data centers across the United States. | ||
| Meanwhile, Meta has unveiled ambitious plans to build massive AI data centers, including the Hyperion project in Louisiana, projected to scale up to five gigawatts of computational power over several years, and the Prometheus cluster in Ohio set to come online in 2026 with one gigawatt and 500,000 gigawatts of data. | ||
| Additionally, Meta is developing multiple Titan clusters with each facility's footprint rivaling significant portions of Manhattan. | ||
| Additionally, data centers use water for cooling servers and other IT equipment to prevent overheating. | ||
| A hyperscale center can guzzle three to five million gallons per day. | ||
| In 2021, data centers collectively consumed 449 million gallons per day, while the rest of America consumed 39 billion gallons per day. | ||
| So data centers use water to cool their data centers used roughly an additional one percent of water resources. | ||
| But as small as these numbers are today, the AI data center, Juggernaut, is inevitably barreling headlong into a water starved future, and the battleground is smack dab in America's dryest regions. | ||
| Out in the southwest, Arizona's a ticking time bomb. | ||
| Phoenix and Mesa are drowning in data centers while the Colorado River chokes. | ||
| Google is already gulping millions of gallons a day, elbowing out farmers and folks just trying to keep the their taps running. | ||
| California's Central Valley and Southern sprawl are getting hammered to with new server farms piling onto a state already choked by drought. | ||
| Then there's Texas. | ||
| Abilene staring down the barrel of OpenAI's Stargate Behemoth, a project set to suck up water in a state where droughts are legendary and farmers are fighting for scraps. | ||
| Over in Georgia, places like Newton County are already paying the price, wells running dry, water turning to sludge, and a looming deficit by twenty thirty. | ||
| Virginia is currently the king of data centers with Northern Virginia's server farms multiplying like roaches draining resources while locals and industries beg for relief. | ||
| Some outfits are tinkering with air cooling or recycling water, but it's a drop in the bucket against the tidal wave of AI's thirst set to explode by 2027. | ||
| But then there's no lobbying group, no environmental group, no group saying This summer in the real studies by the major five power grids that they're all on the verge of collapse just because of AI data centers, including the main Main East Coast grid, the biggest, but they say global warming, you'll have blackouts. | ||
| The power is about to go out, but they never say in those articles. | ||
| It's because AI is already slurping up. | ||
| 40 percent of the power produced in the United States while they shut down the power plants. | ||
| So you don't get power, but AI gets all the power it ever wants because they're paving the way for it because it will control everything we do, but only the power we give it. | ||
| New categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act and Streamlined Clean Water Act permits aim to. | ||
| remove barriers to data center construction, potentially increasing reliance on energy intensive sources like coal, as outlined in an April 2025 executive order promoting coal infrastructure for AI facilities, a resource that Democrats want to eliminate. | ||
| The road to AI innovation is now entering a new roller coaster phase. | ||
| Establishing and maintaining dominance in AI data centers is obviously critical for a country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Friday, August 1st in the year of our Lord, 2025. | |
| And you're listening to the American Journal with your host Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| I think it's time to blow this thing. | ||
| Good morning ladies and gentlemen welcome to the American Journal for this Friday edition. | ||
| I'm your host Harrison Smith coming to you live from the Infowars studios here in Austin, Texas. | ||
| Very happy to be with you here today. | ||
| And folks, last night Chuck Grassley declassified some documents about Russia Gate. | ||
| That just tell it all. | ||
| That just tells the whole story. | ||
| We're going to dig into this document. | ||
| We're going to be drawing line maps. | ||
| We're going to be connecting dots. | ||
| We're going to be confirming what we've known the entire time that the Russia Gate collusion hoax was a deliberate coup carried out by a vast network of deep state operatives. | ||
| And we have it all in black and white now. | ||
| It's just absolutely bombshell stuff. | ||
| We got a ton of tariff news and economic news as well. | ||
| A lot of videos to get into, your calls as well. | ||
| We'll begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, here's folks to your daily dispatch for Friday, the 1st of August 2025. | ||
| Trump sets 10% to 41% reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries' exports. | ||
| Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday imposing reciprocal tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on U.S. imports from dozens of countries and foreign locations. | ||
| Tariffs, a big, big topic of conversation on the news sites today. | ||
| Setting tariffs on Canada as well as a bunch of other countries. | ||
| A lot of conflict with the Fed as he again goes for. | ||
| for Jerome Powell's neck, basically, and trying to get him to actually serve the American people rather than wield his incredible power for the sole purpose and to the sole benefit of the Democratic Party. | ||
| We'll get into that later. | ||
| The second story on similar lines here. | ||
| U.S. job growth slows sharply in July. | ||
| Unemployment rate rises to 4.2%. | ||
| U.S. job growth slowed more than expected in July, while the prior month's data was revised sharply lower, pointing to a sharp moderation in the labor market. | ||
| Non-farm payrolls increased by 73,000 jobs last month after rising by downwardly revised 14,000 in June. | ||
| The Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said in its closely watched employment report on Friday. | ||
| Economists pulled by Reuters had forecast payrolls increasing by 110,000 jobs after rising by previously reported 147,000 in June. | ||
| The unemployment rate rose to 4.2% from 4.1% in June. | ||
| Meanwhile, Trump's special envoy Whitcoff and Israeli Ambassador Huckabee will visit Gaza to surveyed aid distribution sites. | ||
| Prepare the Potemkin village. | ||
| Prepare the Potemkin aid distribution site, Israelis. | ||
| Steve Whitcoff, serving as Trump's special envoy, and U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee are scheduled to visit Gaza on Friday to evaluate aid delivery locations amid a severe humanitarian emergency. | ||
| Their visit follows a war that began on October 7, blah, blah, blah. | ||
| Since the war started, Gaza has faced a complete aid blockade for two and a half months, causing widespread hunger and malnutrition among its 2 million residents and escalating violence at aid distribution points. | ||
| The Gaza Ministry of Health reported that over 90 Palestinians lost their lives and more than 600 were injured within the last 24 hours while trying to receive aid, including 54 fatalities near the Zikim crossing in northern Gaza on Wednesday. | ||
| This visit and increased international pressure came as German foreign minister Johann Wadipol stressed Germany's commitment to a two-state solution and the need to begin peace negotiations immediately. | ||
|
unidentified
|
90 Palestinians killed and more than 600 injured in just the last 54 hours, including 54 and just last 24 hours, including 54 fatalities near the Zikam crossing in northern Gaza on Wednesday. | |
| So just. | ||
| I mean, it's not a war. | ||
| This isn't a war per se. | ||
| It's just mass executions on a daily basis by the dozens. | ||
| Meanwhile, Nayabukele's party in El Salvador changes the El Salvadorian constitution in expansion of presidential power. | ||
| The party of El Salvador President Nayabukele approved constitutional changes in the country's legislative assembly on Thursday that will allow indefinite presidential re-election and extend presidential terms to six years. | ||
| Lawmaker Anna Fuegoa something from the New Ideas Party has proposed the changes to five articles of the Constitution. | ||
| The proposal also included eliminating the second round of the election where two top vote-getters of the first round face off. | ||
| New Ideas, the party and its allies, the Legislative Assembly in the Legislative Assembly quickly approved the proposals with the super-majority they hold. | ||
| The vote passed with 57 in favor and 3 opposed. | ||
| Bukele overwhelmingly won re-election last year despite a constitutional ban after Supreme Court justices selected by his party ruled in 2021 to allow re-election to a second five-year term. | ||
| Observers were worried that Bukele had a plan to consolidate power since at least 2021 when a newly elected Congress with a strong governing party majority voted to remove the magistrates of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court. | ||
| Those justices had been seen in the last check on the popular president. | ||
| Since then, Bukele has only grown more popular. | ||
| The Biden administration's initial expression of concern gave way to quiet acceptance as Bukele announced his run for re-election with the return of U.S. President Donald Trump to the White House in January, Bukele had a new powerful ally and quickly offered Trump help by taking more than 200 deportees from other countries into newly built prisons for gang members. | ||
| Again, this just, we are entering into a new age of kings. | ||
| I don't know who it was yesterday. | ||
| I saw today, it may have been Andrew Torbo. | ||
| Somebody on X made this point, and I think they're right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The world is in a... | |
| And you're going to have strong. | ||
| personalities, usually men, rise up from this rubble and seize the reins. | ||
| As Napoleon put it, you know, the crown of France was in the gutter and I picked it up with my sword. | ||
| You're going to see a lot of crowns being picked up with a lot of swords, I think, in the near future. | ||
| And as whoever this was online, again, I, you know, this is what happens to me is I read like a million ideas online. | ||
| And then I try to repackage them, the ones that I think are valuable for the audience. | ||
| But then I feel guilty because they're not always my ideas, although I do ag agree with them and will expand on them so so sorry I just have this guilt complex where I'm always I have like a like come that's like a compulsion for me I have to tell you that I didn't come up with this idea anyway whoever it was made a great point I said we're going to see a new age of kings there's not going to be called kings but they will be for all intents and purposes Niabukele is basically the | ||
| King of El Salvador and honestly should probably be crowned King of El Salvador. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And this is the process that it always takes, right? | |
| You know, the one thing when you read, you know, Roman history and you learn about the Republic and how it turns into an empire after Caesar conquers the Gauls and reorganizes the entire governmental system. | ||
| And then those changes are confirmed by Augustus, who he adopts as his son, and then adoption becomes the rule of Nebuchadnezzar. | ||
| know, how you pass power along rather than electing consuls. | ||
| It becomes a family affair, which of course is the prerequisite for a dynasty, how you get kings, basically. | ||
| just like in the Roman Republic you have representative government collapsing into bureaucracy a strong man rising and establishing a dynasty I mean we're just gonna we're gonna start seeing that it is in fact not the end of history and we're actually on a on a very exciting trajectory towards some pretty unprecedented governmental manifestations, I believe, around the world. | ||
| So good for Buchelle. | ||
| I think he deserves it. | ||
| I think he deserves it. | ||
| And of course, he infuriates the powers that be more than anything because he has shown with incontrovertible proof. | ||
| that you can solve the problems that they constantly create. | ||
| You can actually have a safe, prosperous country that's not ruled by a collage of violent psychopath criminal gangs. | ||
| And they hate him for that. | ||
| They hate him for that because they are really desperate to make you think that this system is irreparably broken and needs to be replaced with some sort of AI-controlled technocracy. | ||
| They're really desperate. | ||
| to make you think that gee all of these problems all the crime and the house prices and the immigration these are just natural occurrences that are impossible to deal with unless we have surrendered all of our sovereignty and all of our authority to some unelected, technocratic Israeli to deal with. | ||
| So that's not true. | ||
| In fact, you can just throw the criminals in prison. | ||
| You can just round up the networks. | ||
| You can just put things right, achieve justice, and maintain sovereignty if you wanted to do that. | ||
| But the people in power are running the cloud pivot strategy of let's destroy the country. | ||
| by moving away from all the traditions, but then also blame all the traditions for the current state of the country we've destroyed so we can eradicate the traditional governmental establishment in favor of our own communistic, socialistic, unelected, globalist, technocratic control grid. | ||
| Or we can just elect somebody like Bukele and throw the criminals in prison. | ||
| I guess the choice is ours. | ||
| And then we have this, the final story of our Daily Dispatch and the top story maybe ever in history. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Senate releases docs proving Hillary knew Trump was innocent of Russia collusion and worked with the FBI to frame him and that's just yeah Again, Chuck Grassley released these documents, and we have them here. | |
| We have the 30-page slab of paper here to get into. | ||
| And we're just going to have to read through the whole thing. | ||
| We're honestly just going to have to read through the whole thing. | ||
| Authorized for public release by Chairman Grassley. | ||
| Report on matters related to intelligence activities and investigations arising out of the 2016 presidential campaign. | ||
| Long story short. | ||
| It was a giant conspiracy, including Loretta Lynch, Obama, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, everybody in the top brass of the FBI and the CIA, all being coordinated and instructed and guided by the Open Side Societies Foundation, | ||
| George Soros and his operatives quarterbacking it all, manipulating it all, and all of this being done, again, in a way that just confirms absolutely everything we've ever said about this whole situation on Infowars. | ||
| So we're going to dig very, very much into this revelation from Chuck Grassley. | ||
| And I'm telling you, I read through it yesterday and it's just absolutely mind--blowing stuff. | ||
| Stay tuned for that. | ||
| I do want to remind you, while we still have time, you've got to go to thealexjonestore.com, thealexjonestore.com, one of the biggest sales we've ever had there happening right now, the store-wide buy one, get one free super sale for VIPs only, folks. | ||
| You got to sign up for the VIP club. | ||
| And hell, if you're just signing up for the VIP club to take advantage of this sale, I'm not going to tell anybody. | ||
| I won't tell anybody. | ||
| All right. | ||
| You can get away with it. | ||
| We're going to turn a blind eye. | ||
| All you do, you go sign up for the VIP club. | ||
| It's 30 bucks a month. | ||
| You get $40 immediately. | ||
| You spend that money on $80 worth of product with the buy one, get one free VIP sale and then if you want you can cancel the VIP membership no one will be any the wiser all right so wait you're saying that for thirty dollars I get eighty dollars worth of stuff believe it or not Matt that's exactly what I'm saying literally thirty dollars VIP club forty dollars of store credit you've just made ten dollars you buy something that's buy one get one you're doubling your money that's eighty dollars worth of product for | ||
| thirty dollars to join the VIP club. | ||
| And then you can just cancel. | ||
| And I won't tell them. | ||
| I'm not going to say anything. | ||
| Your secret's safe with me. | ||
| It's all right. | ||
| I don't mind. | ||
| Buy one, get one free on all supplements and apparel while supplies last. | ||
| You can unlock massive savings with our storewide buy one, get one super sale at valexjonestore.com where vi. | ||
| where VIP members score buy one get one deals on all supplements and apparel to supercharge your wellness and style. | ||
| This exclusive offer is reserved for our VIP club elites, giving you unbeatable value, top quality products that will fuel your fight for truth and freedom. | ||
| Join today for 30 bucks, get $40, instant in-store credit, plus access to the epic super sale buy one get one free, and you can cancel anytime. | ||
| But when you do sign up for the VIP club, you get a ton of other stuff as well, not just access to this sale, but a bunch of other great discounts. | ||
| Sometimes VIPs get free shipping when it's not available to anybody else. | ||
| You also get to download all of the old archive Alex. | ||
| Alex Jones tapes. | ||
| You can have every Alex Jones radio show. | ||
| It's an archive exclusively available at the Alex Jones store.com for the VIP members. | ||
| Go today, the Alex Jones store.com slash Harrison if you want to let him know who sent you. | ||
| Now, I don't even know how to adequately or appropriately set up this document that's been dropped in our laps here. | ||
| Chuck Grassley released it. | ||
| Report on matters related to intelligence activities and investigations arising out of the 2016 presidential campaign. | ||
| And like I said, I mean, it literally just confirms absolutely everything that we have to say about it. | ||
| There's a story about this on Infowars breaking the classified Durham appendix shows Hillary Clinton personally ordered Trump-Russia hoax used FBI to quote, put oil on the fire. | ||
| Documents revealed deep conspiracy between politicians, non-governmental organizations, and intelligence communities to usurp free and fair elections. | ||
| And we just get into this. | ||
| This classified appendix, so this was an appendix, an addition to the Durham report. | ||
| That I guess was hidden. | ||
| Supposedly this was part of the document tranche that was discovered in burn bags thanks to an FBI whistleblower telling Cash Patel, hey, there's all this evidence that they're about to burn. | ||
| Cash Patel went into some locked secret room in the FBI headquarters, found all these burn bags. | ||
| And I suppose this is a portion of that. | ||
| This classified appendix forms a part of the report on matters related to intelligence activities and investigations arising out of the 2016 presidential campaigns and provides further information about matters covered in three sections of the report. | ||
| These three sections. | ||
| The section provides further factual backgrounds about the, quote, one or the one possible Clinton campaign plan described in the office's report. | ||
| Two, the office's efforts to verify or refute information about that plan. | ||
| And three, the manner in which the department officials received and acted on or did not act on the campaign plan information. | ||
| The office's prosecution decisions related to the plan are described in the other section of the unclassified report. | ||
| Beginning in or about 2014 and continuing at least in or about 2016, individuals affiliated with Russian intelligence services hacked and gained unlawful access. | ||
| Access to emails of numerous U.S. public and private entities, including government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and think tanks based in the United States. | ||
| Among the nonprofit organizations hacked by the Russian government actors in twenty sixteen was the Open Societies Foundation, formerly known as the Soros Foundation. | ||
| From blank through blank, received from a blank source referred to herein as T one, shared with the FBI, intelligence consisting of blank, we identify the information provided by T one as sensitive intelligence. | ||
| The sensitive intelligence included emails, blank, hacking of U.S. base communications, blank, reports analyzing the hacked U.S. material, and three, what appears or purport to be original hacked emails of U.S. persons or portions of such emails. | ||
| Two of the apparently hacked emails appear to have originated from the Open Society Foundations. | ||
| The purported author of these emails was Leonard Bernardo, who was the regional director for Eurasia at the Open Societies Foundation. | ||
| In that capacity, Bernardo oversaw efforts related to Russia and the former Soviet republics, among other countries. | ||
| So again, if you can cast your mind back to 2016, I think you remember there was this scandal about the DNC hacked emails that were supposedly hacked by Russia. | ||
| And I, you know, I very distinctly remember the exact moment Trump made a joke about this. | ||
| And it seemed to me at the time that this was. | ||
| was like perfectly aligned with and seemed to be sort of the impetus for the whole Russia collusion hoax. | ||
| I don't know if y'all remember this, but Trump went out and gave a speech where he said, if the Russians have the emails, release them. | ||
| Release the emails. | ||
| Let us know what we have. | ||
| And it was like from that moment on. | ||
| And it was, you know, it was half a joke from Trump. | ||
| It wasn't him very seriously sending a personal message to Russia saying, Russia, will you please? | ||
| Leak these emails. | ||
| I think half of it was him mocking them because Wikileaks also had the emails. | ||
| So he's making fun of them going, I think Wikileaks has them, but if Russia has them, hell, they should le should leak them. | ||
| They should release them. | ||
| And of course, making the point that our government is, you know, engaged in corrupt activity. | ||
| If there's criminality going on in our government and we have to beg the Russians to expose that because our government is so corrupt that the bad actors in our government would never be caught without outside interference. | ||
| There's a lot of points to that, but nobody watching actually seriously thought that was a legitimate call to Russia to betray the United States and interfere in the election. | ||
| But it was from like that moment on, I remember everybody saying, Donald Trump calls for Russia to interfere in the election. | ||
| He is a Russian puppet. | ||
| How dare he? | ||
| But it's true. | ||
| The Russians had all these emails and they showed collaboration, coordination, conspiracy to not just frame Donald Trump as a Russian agent, nor to, you know, try to prevent him from becoming president, but also admitting in this documentation, and we'll get to it, that it was all in service of the eventual war with Russia. | ||
| that Clinton and her cronies were establishing the groundwork for as early as 2014. | ||
| Of course, the groundwork for that had been laid even earlier with the Ukraine coup and everything, but they actually admit here, and I'll read it to you, and it's really just me patting myself on the back for always bringing up the fact that there's a reason it's Russia that they went with when trying to lie about Trump. | ||
| They could have said he was a Chinese collusion, Saudi Arabian collusion. | ||
| There are any 200 countries they can choose from. | ||
| They chose Russia in particular in order to drive Trump away from friendly activity with Putin. | ||
| knowing that they would eventually go to war with Putin and didn't want some rogue U.S. president making peace with him in the meantime. | ||
| Beginning in 2016, the FBI received information from T1 related to the 2016 presidential election, including reports written by blank. | ||
| These reports purported communications of Bernardo and others. | ||
| In particular, in 2016, T one provided the U.S. government with two blank memoranda that described confidential conversations blank between then democrat and when I say blank, by the way, for our radio listeners, that's when it's been censored. | ||
| It's been blocked out, blacked out. | ||
| Redacted is the word I was looking for. | ||
| Thank you, Matt, between then Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and two individuals of the Open Society Foundation referred to in the memorando as the Soros Foundation, i.e. | ||
|
unidentified
|
E, one, Bernardo, and two, Jeffrey Goldstein, who, according to public resources, was senior policy advisor for Eurasia at the Open Society Foundation. | |
| The January 2016 memorandum, which was in Russian blank, stated the relevant part. | ||
| On January 12th of this year, during a confidential discussion with Jeffrey Goldstein, a representative of the Soros Foundation on Eurasia, Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz characterized the situation in her party in light of the growing scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton as follows. | ||
| Information released to the media in the last few days about the FBI investigating possible corruption related to Department of State under the leadership of Clinton, preferential treatment of donors of the Clinton Foundation caused a significant reaction inside the party. | ||
| At the same time, the leadership of the DP, that's Democratic Party, had known about the information since June of 2015. | ||
| According to Wasserman Schultz, FBI so far does not have persuasive evidence against Hillary Clinton because of the timely deletion of relevant data from mail servers. | ||
| Oh, but her emails. | ||
| But her emails, though. | ||
| This paragraph alone, or this segment alone. | ||
| And as far as I can tell, this is a memorandum. | ||
| from uh you know involving bernardo jeffrey goldstein at the soros foundation aka the Open Societies Foundation and Wasserman Schultz communicating with each other, admitting that Hillary Clinton was involved in corruption at the State Department and that she got away with it by acid-washing her server and then laughing about it in your face. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Music. | |
| You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, yesterday was a O.J. It was like Christmas for conspiracy theorists, I have to tell you. | ||
| The release from Chuck Grassley of these documents, the appendix of the Durham Report that's been hidden, stored away, kept in the dark for almost a decade at this point, | ||
| lays out in no uncertain terms with perfect clarity the conspiracy or I guess I can say a conspiracy an absolute verbatim conspiracy. | ||
| It is truly crazy. | ||
| Stories in Infowars declassified Durham appendix shows Hillary Clinton personally ordered Trump, a Russia hoax, used FBI to quote, put more oil on the fire. | ||
| Folks, every page of this document reveals more criminal activity, blatant corruption, total collusion to screw over the American people and achieve their. | ||
| truly murderous ends. | ||
| So what we just read was that in a memorandum between the Open Society Foundation and the DNC Democratic Party, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, revealed that yes, they were searching for evidence of Hillary Clinton's criminal activity in part because of preferential treatment of donors at the Clinton Foundation by the State Department, right? | ||
| So some organization or individual or country, for that matter, remember one of the biggest donors to the Clinton Foundation was Saudi Arabia. | ||
| They would donate to the Clinton Foundation and then they would receive preferential treatment or extra attention. | ||
| It was a bribe in order to co-opt the power of the State Department for their benefit. | ||
| So the Clintons, Bill and Hillary, running this fake sham charity as a money laundering operation, accepted so-called donations from foreign powers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then in exchange for that so-called donation, they would receive preferential benefit from the State Department. | |
| It's the pay-for-play model that Joe Biden used with his son Hunter and his brother Jim in Boston. | ||
| The same thing was happening in the State Department with Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Essentially, under Obama, the entire American government was just openly for sale. | ||
| And all you had to do was donate to the Clinton Foundation or invest in Hunter's company in order to get access directly to the levers of power in America so that these corrupt people, trying to keep the four-letter words out of my mouth, these corrupt people could sell out your country for their own personal benefit. | ||
| Okay, so they say, yeah, it looks like, you know, FBI was investigating possible corruption relating to Department of State under Clinton, giving preferential treatment to donors to her foundation. | ||
| And that causes significant reaction inside the party, which is surprising. | ||
| I guess the reaction would be, oh my gosh, we have to cover this up quick. | ||
| It's just hard for me to believe the Democrats actually have any genuine, principled outrage at the concept of the Clintons selling out America. | ||
| It seems like they're actually fine with that. | ||
| But apparently it caused negative reaction inside the party. | ||
| But they say and they admit in their own words, FBI so far does not have persuasive evidence against Hillary Clinton because of the timely deletion of relevant data from mail servers. | ||
| So in other words, I mean, they just admit here that there was data on the servers that would have given the FBI all the evidence they would need to prove that Hillary Clinton was running a pay-for-play scheme. | ||
| And this is Debbie Wasserman-Schultz admitting that the only reason the FBI doesn't have the information was because of, quote, timely deletion of relevant data from mail servers. | ||
| Oh, but her emails. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah, but her emails, though. | ||
| Okay, blatant corruption. | ||
| So that's admitted. | ||
| I mean, again, we're on page, literally on page three. | ||
| And already we have the Democrats admitting that they deleted relevant data from the illegal mail servers in order to cover up the criminal pay-for-play corruption activity Hillary Clinton was engaged in with the State Department. | ||
| We're not even done with the third page. | ||
| Obama has no intention to darken the final part of his presidency and legacy by the scandal surrounding the main contender of the Democratic Party. | ||
| He has no intention to darken the final part of his presidency. | ||
| Well, that sort of backfired, didn't it? | ||
| Your legacy could have been that you were a great president and Hillary Clinton was a corrupt scumbag. | ||
| Instead, now your legacy, as we all know, you're the corrupt scumbag. | ||
| You're actually the criminal. | ||
| You actually let people get away with things out of your own ego to upkeep your own self-importance, thinking that this crime against America can't be punished because that might leave a black mark on your complete, fake, falsified, and frankly, scandal-ridden legacy. | ||
| They admit that. | ||
| Obama has no intention to darken the final part of the presidency and legacy by the scandal surrounding the main contender from the DP. | ||
| To solve the problem, the president puts pressure on FBI Director James Comey through Attorney General Lynch, however, so far without concrete results. | ||
| All right, so again, what we have here is we have it admitted by the Democrats, by the Democratic Party in an own internal memo from 2016 saying Clinton was involved in pay-for-play activity, totally corrupt. | ||
| The FBI was investigating it, but they weren't going to find anything because the legal email service had already been whitewashed, already been deleted and acid-washed and bleach-bit. | ||
| And that Obama, in order to preserve his own legacy, sent Attorney General Littoretto Lynch to pressure James Comey to drop the investigation against Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Okay, conspiracy. | ||
| Okay, they conspired. | ||
| They worked in secret to cover up criminal activity so that their agenda could progress and their political cachet could be wielded. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Comey gravitates towards Republicans and apparently intends to prolong the investigation so that the scandal would keep going until the presidential election to jeopardize the chances of the Democrat Party to win the presidential race. | |
| So that's the Democratic Party and the Open Society Foundation saying that they suspect Comey of trying to. | ||
| During confidential contacts on March 5th with Leonard Bernardo, again, Soros Fund Eurasian Regional Director. | ||
| Oh, no, that's a different. | ||
| Okay, sick. | ||
| So they wrote this wrong in this memo, but this is a March 2016 memo. | ||
| And they say, Leonard Bernardo, who was actually the, or maybe he was the fund Eurasian regional director, but he was high up in the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| Debbie Washman-Schultz, chairperson of the National Committee of the Democratic Party, characterized the developments in the pre-election campaign of Hillary Clinton in the following way. | ||
| Quote, In relation to the consensus reached among the Democratic Party leadership regarding the candidacy of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama sanctioned the use of all administrative levers to remove possible negative effects from the FBI investigation of cases related to the Clinton Foundation in the email correspondence in the State Department. | ||
| Barack Obama as president sanctioned the use of all administrative levers to remove possible effects from the FBI investigation of cases. | ||
| Okay, translation here. | ||
| Hillary Clinton broke the law, covered it up by deleting her email server. | ||
| Barack Obama not only sent Loretta Lynch to pressure in a secretive and probably illegal way, pressure the FBI director to drop the case on Hillary Clinton, but actually to activate all possible levers all throughout the executive branch to try to scuttle, | ||
| destroy, delay, somehow prevent the investigation of the FBI into Hillary Clinton, ostensibly to save Obama's legacy, which now, I hope, we all know is in complete tatters as all of his criminal activity and the cover-up is revealed here in black and white for all of us to read in an official document hidden for years, released finally by Chuck Grassley as the chairman of the oversight committee. | ||
| Based on information from Washington Schultz, the FBI does not possess any kind of direct evidence against Clinton because of their timely deletion of the email servers. | ||
| The political director of the Clinton of Hillary Clinton's staff, Amanda Renteria regularly receives information from Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the plans and intentions of the FBI. | ||
| Okay, so another wrinkle of this corruption. | ||
| You not only have the President of the United States pressuring the FBI and using all sorts of other administrative pressures he can wield to drop a legitimate investigation into actual criminal activity of the State Department under his watch. | ||
| But you also have the chief of staff of Hillary Clinton receiving direct reports from the Attorney General Loretta Lynch as to the progression of the FBI investigation, obviously in order to stay ahead of it and to, you know, delete information they'd be getting close to or, I don't know, have suspects they may be questioning commit suicide by shooting themselves twice in the back of the head. | ||
| I'm just speculating. | ||
| But obviously there's a reason that they're being kept abreast of the latest developments in the FBI case. | ||
| And it's not because they're curious, right? | ||
| It's not because they're just so interested in how the FBI is doing these days. | ||
| It's because they committed crimes and now they have somebody on the inside feeding them information about the investigation so they can stay ahead of it. | ||
| Total criminal activity. | ||
| This person's not even in the government. | ||
| She's an assistant to Hillary Clinton who at the time was running for president. | ||
| So you now have people within the president within the government working with law enforcement to destroy the investigation in order to help the presumed candidate of the Democratic Party total open blatant treasonous corruption. | ||
| Every single person mentioned in this has to be arrested. | ||
| I think Alex Jones said 60 days. | ||
| I fine. | ||
| That's a little long for me. | ||
| 60 minutes is more like the timeline I would like to work with, but should we say 60 days, two months? | ||
| So we got August and September. | ||
| If by October. | ||
| These people aren't arrested. | ||
| Maybe we have to arrest them ourselves. | ||
| I mean, maybe that's the ultimate lesson of Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers, which is like justice isn't dependent on what the government will give you, just like our rights are not dependent on what the government will give us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you've got criminal activity happening and the government isn't stopping it, it's not just legal. | |
| All right, now that's trying to be crazy. | ||
| I like it. | ||
| I like the sentiment. | ||
| But oh my God. | ||
| There's a joke from the Drew Carey show that I've remembered my whole life from the early 90s. | ||
| The character's like, do you guys hear a clock ticking in your head that just gets louder and louder all the time? | ||
| No, you don't? | ||
| Anyway, that scared the crap out of me as a kid. | ||
| The idea of a clock ticking in your head always getting louder. | ||
| The crew just somehow have invoked long dormant PTSD in my brain with that ticking sound. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's the sound you hear on Sunday nights before you have to go to bed to go to school on Monday. | |
| Or do a show on Monday morning. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| No joke. | ||
| No, yeah, I've got what they call Captain Hook syndrome. | ||
| I can't hear that talk clock ticking without my heart rate going up. | ||
| All right. | ||
| What was I saying? | ||
| Just total, just total, blatant. | ||
| like if the government doesn't give you justice that doesn't mean that justice has therefore been achieved right if like you you got to you got to go out and get it yourself actually actually the government doesn't give you justice that doesn't mean that you have to be okay with that doesn't mean you have to accept that if you know a criminal is able to manipulate the legal system in order to get away with the crime. | ||
| That doesn't mean he is therefore metaphysically innocent. | ||
| Right? | ||
| The structures of our government, just like they don't grant us rights, they simply codify and enumerate them. | ||
| They don't grant us justice either. | ||
| They're just the most convenient, you know, form to achieve justice that we've all agreed to adhere to as long as it works. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's sort of the key part, as long as it works. | |
| If these systems of... | ||
| of evidence of blatant criminality at the highest levels of our government and our justice, so-called justice system, is incapable of holding these people accountable or punishing them or in any way bringing them under the same purview and authority that you or I would be under, then it's not a system of justice. | ||
| It's just purely a system of power. | ||
| to impose upon your enemy. | ||
| And so we're under no obligation to adhere to it. | ||
| They've broken the societal contract. | ||
| And look, I've said it a million times. | ||
| That is genuinely the last thing that I want. | ||
| All we want, Trump supporters, info warriors, conservatives, patriotic Americans, is for the American system to function as designed, to be used with the intent that it was designed to be used for, and for us to rescue this system. | ||
| and reinvigorate this system and rebuild this system and reinforce this system so that we can achieve justice and hold these criminals to account and not have our justice system taken over by a bunch of criminals.ality and punish anybody that tries to stand up against them. | ||
| And if it gets to the point where we got to get vigilante justice, where our justice system is incapable or unwilling to actually punish the real criminals while ruthlessly pursuing you for any perceived slight against the powers that be. | ||
| It would get really bad. | ||
| It would be really bad, and especially at this very dangerous time where we have a bunch of enemies geopolitically just waiting for us to have our guard down mobs of Americans, you know, kicking down the gates to private neighborhoods and hauling Loretta Lynch out of her bed for some street justice. | ||
| God forbid we have to descend to that. | ||
| And do we not get that that's the whole reason that we have a justice system? | ||
| Is because the alternative is mob rule is just like lynching people and just like riots and, right, we have the system. | ||
| And so people don't act on their impulses. | ||
| They don't just try to achieve justice themselves. | ||
| They don't get revenge themselves. | ||
| They don't take on vendettas and go try to dish out their own version of punishment under their own judgment. | ||
| We all agree we're not going to do that. | ||
| We'll leave it up to the system because we trust it and because it works as intended. | ||
| If it doesn't work as intended, there's no reason to trust it. | ||
| This societal social contract is broken. | ||
| And so there's no reason to adhere to it. | ||
| So like this really isn't an option. | ||
| Punishment has to happen. | ||
| Frankly, I think it's going to happen. | ||
| The only question is how is it going to happen? | ||
| I would love to see it happen through the appropriate channels, leveling the prescribed punishment against these vicious, corrupt idiots whose crimes have been exposed in black and white for the world to see. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Desperate for our American system to prove its own worth, to prove its own value, to insist upon its own legitimacy. | |
| people of investigating not just the people enumerated in this document, but the organizations that they work for being investigated as the mafias that they are. | ||
| In this document, you've got the Open Society Foundation, the Democratic Party, and a number of other organizations harboring criminals, working as the organizations by which criminals commit their crimes. | ||
| How do we even have this document and there haven't been SWAT teams kicking down the door of the Democratic headquarters and hauling away all of their computers. | ||
| How is this not treated as a perfectly valid and legal warrant for arresting, interrogating, and surveilling every single member of the Open Society Foundation leadership? | ||
| I mean, they were doing this in their capacity as, you know, Eurasian regional director of the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| So it's not like this is a situation where, you know, some dude who works at Microsoft runs a scam. | ||
| But you're not going to punish Microsoft for that. | ||
| He's an individual. | ||
| He committed a crime. | ||
| He'll be punished. | ||
| The company has nothing to do with it. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| This was done in the official capacity using the official and, you know, corporate attributes, corporate capabilities of the Open Society Foundation to achieve this political manipulation, corruption, pay-for-play activity. | ||
| The political director of the Hillary Clinton staff, Amanda Rinteria, regularly receives information from Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the plans and intentions of the FBI. | ||
| And of course, y'all remember that there was a giant scandal that they completely tried to ignore where Loretta Lynch was caught in person in 2016. | ||
| FBI never probed confidential talks between D ⁇ C, Clinton campaign, and George Soros group bombshell intel files show. | ||
| They've known it. | ||
| This is from the Durham report. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This has been hidden for the last five, six years at least. | |
| The last five, six years at least. | ||
| Active work is being done questioning potential witnesses who are mostly computer specialists in the Clinton private circle. | ||
| They represent the only tools that may be used in this matter. | ||
| Therefore, the threat is minimal. | ||
| DNC predicts a certain Clinton victory in the current presidential campaign. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The impressive results of Donald Trump are dividing the Republican Party elite, which finds itself in near-panic condition. | |
| Ha ha ha. | ||
| Ha ha ha ha. | ||
| Mwahaha. | ||
| So again, this memo is from 2016, which I love that we have these internal memories from 2016 to show you what they were actually thinking at the time. | ||
| just how wrong they were. | ||
| The two-pronged DP opposition is focused on discrediting Trump through debates and propaganda activity based upon his weak points, such as his uncontrollable temperament, questionable instances in business dealing, absence of diplomatic skills, lack of political experience. | ||
| Among other things, the Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations of business relations between Trump and the Russian mafia, quote unquote. | ||
| And then they list a bunch of people who they are basically saying we're going to try to pretend to tie him to these people because all these people have associations with the Russian government. | ||
| So again, just like when we talk about these media campaigns, the psychological operations, this is what we're talking about. | ||
| I mean, it's not, we're not kidding. | ||
| when we say this. | ||
| We're not exaggerating or using dramatic words for effect. | ||
| Literally, the Open Society Foundation, the federal government, the DNC, the Clinton campaign, all of their collaborators in the mainstream media literally send memos to one another going, here's the plan. | ||
| We're going to try to discredit Trump by associating him with Russian oligarchs and mafia members. | ||
| Here's the list of the people to associate him with. | ||
| Here are the things to go after. | ||
| His inexperience with this, his temperament, his this. | ||
| And they get these and they follow the instructions. | ||
| And so, you know, to the average person out there. | ||
| who doesn't have the ability to, you know, imagine things, I guess, sees all of this happen all at once. | ||
| And to them, the ubiquity of the statements, the, how should I put it, the unified and coordinated revelation of information, to them is evidence of its truth, which is the opposite of what it is. | ||
| See, these talking points go out to all the media outlets. | ||
| So they all push the same story at the same time. | ||
| Now to us, who know what's going on in the background, we understand, okay, a memo's gone out. | ||
| They've gotten their talking points. | ||
| They're all following the same script. | ||
| To the average Normie out there who doesn't see that, all they see is, gee, NBC's reporting this, but so is CNN and Fox News is saying the same thing. | ||
| If everybody's saying the same thing, it must be true. | ||
| How could they all come to the same conclusion? | ||
| If it's not true, it must be true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's part of the strategy, right? | |
| When you have a full spectrum push where everybody's reporting it, everybody in a slightly different way, everybody reports it as if they themselves discovered it or as if it's No, the reality is they're getting memos that are directing them specifically what to say, when to say it, how to say it, who to relate it to, and what the purpose of it is. | ||
| So again, when Normys see this, to them, they, they, you know, it's almost like the, it's almost like the quote of like, meat comes from the store, right? | ||
| It's like, well, the meat's on the shelf. | ||
| There it is. | ||
| They never stop to think like, well, where did it come from? | ||
| How did it get here? | ||
| Where was it before this? | ||
| How did they? | ||
| Right. | ||
| You shouldn't hunt. | ||
| You should get meat from the store where it comes from. | ||
| Right. | ||
| To these people, it's like, well, once the story's on the headline, it's just there. | ||
| It just appears there. | ||
| It's just there. | ||
| God only knows where it came from or, you know, what was happening before then. | ||
| It's just, it's just presented to to them and they just accept it and don't think about what motivation anybody had for posting it. | ||
| So they just see Trump Russia, Trump Russia. | ||
| NBC's telling me, CNN's telling me, Fox is telling me. | ||
| They just hear it pumped into their head over and over, Trump Russia, Trump Russia, Trump Russia, Trump Russia. | ||
| And eventually, they believe it. | ||
| That's the purpose of the coordinated attack. | ||
| That's the purpose of the collaboration, the conspiracy behind the scenes. | ||
| We're just barely stressing ourselves, folks., welcome back. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| We have a lot of other stories to that we could be getting to here. | ||
| I got a lot of other videos to go to. | ||
| Obviously, you know, everything that we covered in the Daily Dispatch. | ||
| We've got in Oklahoma City approving controversial facial recognition deals. | ||
| The O'Keeffe Media Group's come out with new undercover footage showing the director of a nonprofit. | ||
| group admitting that they tip off illegal aliens when ICE is nearby. | ||
| So another person whose name should be on the arrest list, Manhunt in Colorado after agent opens fire on criminal illegals attempting to ram ICE vehicle. | ||
| So now you've got illegal immigrants using vehicles as a weapon trying to ram ICE agents. | ||
| We got, you know, the ongoing starvation situation in Gaza. | ||
| Joe Biden is under the impression that marginalized groups are dramatically under attack in this country, which I think we're all. | ||
| shocked to hear that Joe Biden is in fact still alive. | ||
| Trump envoys his Gaza aid efforts personally. | ||
| Like we got a lot that we could be talking about. | ||
| We got a lot of stuff going on in the world. | ||
| But I don't think anybody will blame me if I just keep reading through this document and I'm just going to have to speed it up a little bit because I've been commenting on a lot of it and trying to put it all in perspective. | ||
| I'm just going to have to trust the InfoWars audience to understand some of the conclusions embedded in this article for themselves because I'm going to try to get through as much of it as possible and I can't constantly be harping on and on about, you know, what it implies. | ||
| And I'm going to have to trust you to do that. | ||
| I do want to go to a video though. | ||
| Clip number one. | ||
| This is a video. | ||
| I believe this is a report from 2020, if I'm not mistaken. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was posted by Mays Moore on X. But this is... | |
| This is from Fox News. | ||
| DOJ investigating James Comey over alleged leak of Russian intelligence document. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number one. | ||
| The document reportedly came to the attention of US intelligence officials from Dutch intelligence. | ||
| It included discussion of an email exchange between former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Leonard Bernardo, an official with Open Society Foundations run by George Soros. | ||
| According to the Times, Wasserman Schultz allegedly told Bernardo that then Attorney General Loretta Lynch would not charge Clinton with a crime for having the private email server. | ||
| Wasserman Schultz and Bernardo have both denied even being in contact with each other, suggesting the document was a fake attempt by the Russians to throw a wrench into the U.S. intelligence community. | ||
| A spokeswoman for Bernardo sent me a statement today. | ||
| I want to read part of it. | ||
| Quote, Bernardo has never spoken with or corresponded with Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz in any fashion. | ||
| The email mentioned is fictitious disinformation. | ||
| Yep, folks, believe it or not, it was discovered in 2020 that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was communicating with this character from the Open Societies Foundation. | ||
| was discovered and exposed. | ||
| And in 2020, they denied ever talking to each other, ever corresponding with each other whatsoever, and said, in fact, claims that they did talk were Russian disinformation. | ||
| Is it becoming clear to you how just blatantly criminal all of this is? | ||
| This isn't the type of stuff. | ||
| that you do when you're on the up and up when you're following the law. | ||
| Lying to cover up the lies, to cover up the lies, to cover up the lies, communications, to talk about how they're manipulating things, those communications being exposed and they lie about the exposure saying actually that's a Russian, that's Russian disinformation when really they were exposed for being the ones to create the whole fake trend of Russian disinformation to cover up the disinformation they were spreading specifically to hamper our relationship with Russia. | ||
| Hope we're all keeping up. | ||
| It's a tangled web. | ||
| Oh, what a tangled web weave when we practice to deceive. | ||
| And that's what we're seeing here. | ||
| So we'll continue to untangle this very tangled web on the other side. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls. | ||
| Maybe this hour, maybe the next hour. | ||
| I'm going to see how much of this I can get through. | ||
| Because there is so very much more to come. | ||
| So much more information to be discovered. | ||
| We're on page 5 of 30, folks. | ||
| 5 of 30. | ||
| And already, I found at least like 10 crimes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Music. | |
| Putting the power of conversation into the caller's hands. | ||
| You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| All right, welcome back folks. | ||
| Again, we're just reading through this document release from the Senate. | ||
| Senator Grassley published this document that's been hidden for nine years at least. | ||
| Yeah, I'm not even skipping anything. | ||
| Every paragraph in this has evidence of the crimes that the Democrats committed in collaboration with the FBI. | ||
| With regard to the discussion in the last paragraph of this memorandum of scandalous revelations that the quote Clinton staff was preparing with a report from quote special services. | ||
| The words that FBI linguists translated as special services are Russian words that one analyst believed at the time referred to the FBI and CIA or more broadly the intelligence and law enforcement communities. | ||
| So in other words, when they said special services, the FBI was like, okay, that's sort of code for intelligence agents of some sort. | ||
| Another analyst caveating, it was speculation, said that perhaps the phrase special services in this context could refer to Trump dossier author Christopher Steele, who, according to media reports and Steele's own testimony in UK legal proceedings, formally worked as an intelligence professional for the British government. | ||
| In addition, the office has determined that at the time of this memorandum, Glenn Simpson's firm, Fusion GPS, was, in fact, preparing open source opposition research regarding Trump's purported ties to Russian oligarchs. | ||
| Blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, redacted, redacted, redacted. | ||
| On March 31, 2016, FBI personnel, including Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Deputy General Counsel Anderson, Assistant Director for the Cyber Division, James Trainer, and the Director's Chief of Staff, James Rabicki, shared the intelligence information with associate Deputy Attorney General David Margolis, the highest-ranking career official in the department, and other senior career officials at the department. | ||
| The FBI briefed Margolis on the specifics of the sensitive intelligence and informed him that the FBI assessed the information to likely not be credible. | ||
| FBI's assessment, according to McCabe and later memorialized by Anderson in an August 12, 2016 memorandum discussed below, was based on four factors. | ||
| First, the report reflected multiple levels of hearsay. | ||
| Second, somebody involved in the communication or in passing along the communication to somebody at a think tank may have engaged in exaggeration. | ||
| Third, the blank. | ||
| who drafted the reports may have engaged in editorialization or exaggeration. | ||
| Fourth, the reports may be unreliable because of translation errors. | ||
| Okay, so four reasons why the Steel CRISPR dossier was illegitimate on the face of it. | ||
| After that meeting, the FBI sought any additional related information from T1. | ||
| T1 had no responsive information at this time. | ||
| The FBI considered taking a number of covert investigative steps to determine, among other things, whether the Attorney General had in fact communicated with Amanda Renterra, the political director of the Hillary Clinton staff referenced in the blank memorandum. | ||
| The FBI ultimately decided not to take those steps. | ||
| The FBI ultimately decided not to take these steps. | ||
| So earlier, it was admitted that Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, her political director, was receiving, quote, regular updates from Attorney General Loretta Lynch informing her as to the progress of the FBI investigation so they could step ahead and be, you know, bleach bitching, well, bleach bidding whatever. | ||
| servers that they needed to just before the FBI was able to seize them. | ||
| The FBI, I guess, got a tip that the Attorney General had been communicating with Amanda Renteria and just didn't. | ||
| investigate it. | ||
| Just decided that might be happening, but we're not going to be looking into it. | ||
| Okay, great. | ||
| Comey told the OIG that the FBI did not pursue these steps because the information in Blank's reports was not credible on its face, but it was true. | ||
| It was just, I guess the reports weren't credible, but the information was true. | ||
| rep your mind around that one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In this regard, Tricia Anderson told investigators that the director had said... | |
| Okay, so again, it gets a little convoluted. | ||
| Trisha Anderson told investigators that the director had said the assertion that the Attorney General was pressuring him in connection to the mid-year exam investigations gave him doubt as to the credibility of the two documents. | ||
| So basically saying, because Attorney General Loretta Lynch is pressuring me, I've got doubts about the legitimacy of any of this. | ||
| In other words, they're trying to stop me from investigating it. | ||
| It's only raising my hackles and causing me to be more suspicious. | ||
| He also understood that Margolis' view was that pursuing such steps would take us down the path where, quote, we're investigating the Attorney General of the United States and that Margolis thought that you ought to have more of a reason to go forward with it than you have. | ||
| And remember, this was pretty much the same excuse that Comey used when dropping the investigation into Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Basically going, oh, this is a really big step and we really don't have the, we really need something more to take such an unprecedented step, investigating the Attorney General. | ||
| I mean, we got to really be sure. | ||
| But of course, I mean, they're all communicating with each other. | ||
| Comey himself knows that Loretta Lynch is trying to stop him from investigating. | ||
| So, I mean, it's just all bullcrap. | ||
| It's all hogwash. | ||
| They're all lying. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They know exactly the criminal activity they're involved in. | ||
| And they're just choosing, they're using their discretion as law enforcement agents to not investigate something that they don't want to find out about. | ||
| I would say that's a violation of their oath of office is they are in fact obligated to go after criminal activity even and I would say especially when it's being committed by those at the highest level of government but they're choosing to not pursue something that they probably knew was true anyway because they know it's true. | ||
| In other words, if they didn't think Loretta Lynch was talking to the Hillary Clinton campaign, they probably would have investigated that because then they could come out and say, we've investigated it and we have found no collaborating evidence that this is happening. | ||
| We clear Loretta Lynch's name. | ||
| They would investigate it if it wasn't happening. | ||
| They know that it's happening, so they're not going to investigate it. | ||
| So instead of having to come out and say, yes, they are communicating, this is criminal, and we're going to charge the attorney general with corruption and violation of her oath of office and violation of classified information and just working with the criminal to, you know, scuttle the investigation. | ||
| I mean, it's just so, it's just so criminal. | ||
| It's just so ridiculously criminal. | ||
| And maybe it's easier to understand if you just put it in like a small town context where like The, you know, some, some, whatever city, city manager is under investigation by the local cops and the attorney general of the city is feeding them information about the cops investigation. | ||
| There's a murder case and the suspected murderer is getting inside information from the mayor of the city going, hey, the police are going to go search your, your, you know, cabin. | ||
| You better go clean it out right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just helping them get away with the crime. | |
| Telling them what the investigation is doing in order to help them get away with the crime. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| I said I wouldn't try to exaggerate just every one of these lines. | ||
| When you really think about what they're saying, you see the true scale, scope, the ubiquity of this deception, deceit, corruption, manipulation, PSIOP campaign. | ||
| The FBI received additional information from T1 regarding a possible Clinton campaign plan after receiving intelligence in 2016. | ||
| The FBI subsequently received additional intelligence from TI, particularly in late July 2016. | ||
| They received a report that summarized certain hacked emails allegedly sent by Leonard Bernardo of the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| And that's the other aspect of this is that you have George Soros, who himself, by the way, is a foreigner at the center of all of this. | ||
| The memorandum stated that Clinton approved a plan proposed by one of her foreign policy advisors, Julianne Smith, to, quote, smear Donald Trump by magnifying the scandal tied to intrusion by the Russian special services in the pre-election process to benefit the Republican candidate. | ||
| The translated draft memorandum stated, in relevant part, according to the data from the election campaign headquarters of Hillary Clinton obtained via the U.S. George Soros Foundation on the 26th of July 2016, Clinton approved a plan of her policy advisor, Julianna Smith, from the T's NAB, that's an unknown acronym, to smear Donald Trump by magnifying the scandal tied to the intrusion of the Russian special services in the pre-election process to benefit the Republican candidate. | ||
| As envisioned by Smith, raising the theme of Putin's support for Trump to the level of the Olympics scandal would divert the constituents' attention from the investigation of Clinton's compromised electronic correspondence. | ||
| All right, let me read that one again. | ||
| As envisioned by Smith, raising the theme of Putin's support for Trump to the level of the Olympics scandal. | ||
| And I don't even know what that, does anybody remember what the Olympics scandal was? | ||
| I don't remember that one. | ||
| But suffice it to say, they're saying that if we're able to drum up this scandal, if we're able to manufacture evidence or to create out of whole cloth a scandal about Trump being associated with Putin and drive that through the media and force that into the conversation and drive it to such a pitch of attention that's equal to, you know, one of these other scandals like the Olympic scandal that will divert constituents' attention from the investigation of Clinton's compromised electronic correspondence. | ||
| So according to this paragraph, hidden for nine years, in this translated memorandum, I believe from the Soros Foundation or something else. | ||
| Oh, by the way, at the time, Smith worked for the Center for New American Security, CNAS, and was serving as a Clinton campaign foreign policy advisor. | ||
| She advised investigators were never received notification that her account was hacked, but was where the CNAS was regularly challenged by friends in China and Russia. | ||
| So again, CNAS is one of the organizing, one of the organizations that helps to facilitate all of this corruption and manipulation. | ||
| And of course, is one of the main nodes whenever we like to play old Wikipedia hopscotch. | ||
| All the evil people are all a part of CNAS and PNAC and all these acronyms. | ||
| So anyway, what they admit here., just in no uncertain terms and in black and white, is that they in part came up with the Russia collusion hoax, admitting it's a hoax and knowing it's a hoax, drumming up the scandal that they knew was fake, at least in part to literally just distract from Hillary Clinton's email scandal. | ||
| Literally. | ||
| They said it would divert the constituents' attention away from the investigation of Clinton's compromised electronic correspondence. | ||
| So just if you're a Democrat, if you've ever, or God forbid, if you still have ever given credence to the Russia collusion hoax by Trump, you get that you're a sucker, right? | ||
| You're a sucker and you fell for it. | ||
| Okay, Hillary Clinton's the criminal. | ||
| She was under investigation. | ||
| She was corresponding with the Attorney General. | ||
| She was deleting her email server to hide the evidence. | ||
| Just rampant, blatant, pay-for-play, criminal corruption. | ||
| And that they launched this utterly falsified dog and pony show about Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin and you like an absolute sucker, the biggest goober dumbass mark in the world followed the laser pointer you followed the bouncing ball you let her distract you with a shiny toy so she could get away with all of her criminality manipulate you to go after her enemies who hadn't done anything | ||
| wrong were not under investigation and had never used the office of secretary of state to enrich herself by selling out your country from underneath you. | ||
| So anybody that fell for this Russia collusion from the beginning should have realized or should know now. | ||
| And it's really incontrovertible. | ||
| You are a sucker and you fell for it, you absolute idiots. | ||
| That should distract people from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level, an apparent reference to the revelations of massive state-sponsored doping campaign by Russia following the 2014 Winter Games in Sochioka. | ||
| In addition, by subsequently steering public opinion towards the notion that it needs to equate, quote, Putin's efforts to influence political processes in the U.S. via cyberspace to act against a crucially important infrastructure resembling a national power network would force the White House to use more confrontational scenarios vis-à-vis Moscow, that as a whole suits Clinton's line of conduct. | ||
| This is what I mean, this is what I was talking about in the beginning of the show. | ||
| We've always said there's a reason that it was Russia that they wanted to associate Donald Trump with. | ||
| And it's because they have planned to go after Russia for a long time. | ||
| And they've worked inside Ukraine for a very long time with the ultimate goal of committing regime change in Russia, going to war in Ukraine. | ||
| siphoning all of the wealth they possibly can from that country through a variety of, you know, corrupt agreements. | ||
| And they were worried that Trump was going to come in and make peace with Russia and look into what was going on in Ukraine and find out about all the corruption. | ||
| And of course, that's what he did. | ||
| And that was the first impeachment that they launched. | ||
| just understand, like the war with Russia that we're currently involved in and exacerbating was planned a long time ago, and this planned specifically to spread the hoax about Trump and Putin was designed to keep America and Russia at odds with one another. | ||
| on the wrong foot with one another so that eventually America could launch a war against Russia and pretend to be the defenders get all NATO to go along with it. | ||
| And this gets a lot more important. | ||
| And I'll go to some tweets from Mike Bins here in just a second about this idea of the cyberspace cyber attacks against crucially important infrastructure. | ||
| So basically, in addition to subsequently steering public opinion towards the notion it needs to equate Putin's efforts to influence political processes in the U.S. via cyberspace to acts against a crucially important infrastructure resembling. | ||
| So in other words, they say, If we spread this lie that Putin is trying to hack the presidential campaign, we'll be able to sort of morph that into threats against our critical infrastructure. | ||
| And what they were trying to do and succeeded in doing by spreading this misinformation was getting Barack Obama to come out and make aggressive statements against Russia, you know, driving the wedge between Russia and America farther. | ||
| As they say, this would force the White House to use a more confrontational, you know, footing vis-à-vis Moscow that as a whole suits Clinton's line of conduct. | ||
| Translation. | ||
| By lying about Russia's involvement with Donald Trump, not only do you, A, distract from Clinton's own email service server and the illegal investigation into it. | ||
| B, associate Trump with Putin and create a bunch of scandal for him and force him on the defensive through your lies. | ||
| Three, force Russia and America into the paradigm of enemies, just guaranteeing that no potential alliance forms there. | ||
| Four, gives you the ability to claim that the attacks on the election or attacks on critical infrastructure are therefore an act of war and further aggravate the conflict with Putin. | ||
| And of course, five, if you associate Trump with Putin, then once he's in office, if he ever gets in office, he'll be hamstrung by that insinuation and will be unable to pursue his own goals and will be forced de facto to pursue the line of action that the Clintons, AKA the deep state, have established for him. | ||
| A relatively sluggish reaction by the administration to the events surrounding the DNC that led to the resignation of Deborah of Chairman Deborah Walshman Schultz provoked exasperation within the PC, possibly a political convention and the entire deep state, which is hilarious that they just reference the deep state in this article from 2016 with the capital letters as if it was just a real thing. | ||
| No, no quotation marks around this, which may also be used by Clinton to reinforce her position among the security service agents. | ||
| Clinton's supporters in the FBI lack conclusive, irrefutable evidence of the Russia Federation's involvement in the scandal tied to the theft of the DNC's correspondence. | ||
| In the meantime, during the launch investigation, there has been a multitude of circumstantial evidence that the alias of Guccifer 2.0, the name of the hacker who accepted responsibility for the incident, was in fact used to cover up a special unit of the GRU of the Russian Defense Ministry's general staff. | ||
| During the first stage of the campaign, due to lack of direct evidence, it was decided to disseminate the necessary information through the FBI-affiliated attic-based technical structures that are involved in cybersecurity, in particular the CrowdStrike and ThreatConnect companies, from where the information would then be disseminated through leading U.S. publications. | ||
| In addition, it is presumed in the FBI that in the future, any clumsy propaganda campaign by the GRU is bound to lead to the emergence of more reliable indications of Moscow's involvement, which would imminently intensify the U.S. confrontational tendencies towards Russia. | ||
| So again, they're trying to foster the confrontational tendencies towards Russia. | ||
| They're using CrowdStrike to launder information from the intelligence community through the media, or as they put it., it would be disseminated through leading U.S. publications. | ||
| The next part is massively redacted, but you basically have blank memorandum, blank contains blank a reference to the Atlantic Council, a think tank based in DC, another blank, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. | ||
| According to an FBI analyst interviewed by the office, US institution that was the source of the relevant of the hacked US institution that was the source of the relevant US communications, the above reference memorandum included the English text of the document, one blank, blank, blank as discussed above. | ||
| The document contained purported email from Bernardo appears to have been partially based there. | ||
| Blank of the document which contained the following text from Leonardo Bernardo, July 25, 2016. | ||
| So again, just all right. | ||
| So we've got the Atlantic Council. | ||
| We've got the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| We've got the Carnegie Endowment. | ||
| Who knows what's behind any of these other redacted segments? | ||
| We've got the Clinton Global Initiative. | ||
| We've got Obama and his team with Loretta Lynch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We've got the FBI. | |
| I mean, all of these are... | ||
| And you can see they're all working with each other. | ||
| They're all covering up for each other. | ||
| They're also pressuring each other. | ||
| They're, you know, wielding information against one another. | ||
| They're collaborating while pretending to be at odds. | ||
| They're at odds while they're pretending to collaborate. | ||
| I mean, this is a view behind the curtain. | ||
| This is how the sausage gets made. | ||
| This is not speculation because we've been able to speculate and we've been pretty much dead on on all of this. | ||
| From the little hints that we've seen, we have been pretty much dead on, 100% accurate about everything that we assumed was happening behind the scenes. | ||
| This is in their own words, from their own information, exactly what happened with names, dates, times, and verbatim communications. | ||
| Again, confirming pretty much everything that we've known. | ||
| And actually, it's even worse. | ||
| Actually, we were not sure and not aware of just how involved George Soros' Open Society found Foundation was in this. | ||
| We didn't realize how blatantly they were communicating about, yeah, the FBI's looking for stuff, but they aren't going to find it because all the evidence was on the servers we deleted. | ||
| Like we knew that was true, but we haven't had it admitted. | ||
| We haven't had the confession of it yet until now. | ||
| But this gets so much bigger. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's so much bigger. | |
| And it sort of starts with the... | ||
| Thank Email we're about to read from Leonardo But Mike Pence Mike Binns is going crazy about this Because | ||
| He says, holy effing crap, this is the gosh darn classified index that has been classified for nine gosh darn years. | ||
| This is where they cooked up the critical infrastructure hoax that created the legal predicate cover for the entire censorship industrial complex. | ||
| It's all been a scheme. | ||
| It's all been a giant charade. | ||
| All the people that we told you were involved were involved. | ||
| They all collaborated. | ||
| They all thought they were going to get away with it because they really thought with all this scheming, with all this criminality, with all this gangsterism and mafia tactics and deception and psyops and cover-ups, they never thought. | ||
| in a million years that would fail. | ||
| How could you scheme so much and still fail? | ||
| How can you be so corrupt and still fail? | ||
|
unidentified
|
In the power of conversation into the caller's hands, you're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal, 933 Central Standard Time. | ||
| We're halfway through the show today. | ||
| We're halfway through the show today. | ||
| And I'm making our way, we're making our way slowly but surely through this publication by Chuck Grassley. | ||
| And every one of these pages has revelations. | ||
| Every one of the revelations entails so much. | ||
| You dig down into it. | ||
| But I don't want to lose the forest for the trees and just try to lay out like what, so so far, so far what we've learned, first of all, is that everything revealed in this has been known for years as this was. | ||
| gathered and written and established and then classified years ago. | ||
| It is again the classified appendix to the Investigation arising out of the 2016 presidential campaign, so this is the addendum to the Durham report that was hidden and now finally revealed. | ||
| What we've learned is that Russian intelligence hacked and gained unlawful access to emails of numerous U.S. public and private entities, including government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and think tanks, including the Open Societies Foundation, which at the time was known as the Soros Foundation. | ||
| And they found emails between Leonard Bernardo, who at the time was the regional director for Eurasia at the Open Societies Foundation. | ||
| coordinating with Debbie Washerman-Schultz to orchestrate the entire Russia-clues and hoax from the beginning with the cooperation of Obama, his Department of Justice, and the FBI. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We learned that this was all quarterbacked and supervised and coordinated by the Open Societies Foundation in collaboration with Debbie Washerman Schultz, who at the time was the head of the DNC. | |
| We discovered that... | ||
| They're trying to investigate those claims, but couldn't because, as they admit, the timely deletion of relevant data from mail servers. | ||
| Okay, so again, in this document, we have that the FBI was investigating the Hillary Clinton because the State Department was giving preferential treatment, pay-for-play, with people who donated to the Clinton Global Initiative. | ||
| But that all of that business was done on illegal off-site email servers that were wiped before the FBI could seize them. | ||
| In addition to that, Obama had no intention to darken the final part of his presidency and legacy. | ||
| So in order to protect his own legacy and preserve his own so-called supposedly scandal-free presidency, Barack Obama sent Attorney General Loretta Lynch to lean on and try to pressure Comey to drop the investigation into Hillary Clinton. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In addition to that, he... | |
| Barack Obama sanctioned the use of all administrative levers to remove possible negative effects from the FBI investigation of cases related to the Clinton Foundation and the email correspondence of the State Department. | ||
| We also heard that the political director of the Hillary Clinton staff, Amanda Renteria, was receiving regular updates from Loretta Lynch advising her as to the plans and intentions of the FBI so they could stay ahead of it. | ||
| and avoid having them find evidence of their criminal activity. | ||
| Then they lay out in no uncertain terms how they were going to be releasing this information about Trump and trying to associate him with members of the Russian mafia and later directly with Putin because of a couple of reasons, because they wanted to obviously frame Trump, but they also obviously wanted to drive a wedge between America and Russia. | ||
| They wanted to decrease the likelihood that Trump, if he ever did get power, would be able to end their long-laid plans for eventual war with Russia, the Third World War regime change, eliminating Russia as a nationalist barrier to their globalist schemes. | ||
| We have all the names of all the people involved in this. | ||
| Christopher Steele, Glenn Simpson, Fusion GPS, Andrew McCabe, James Trainer, James Rabiki, David Margolis. | ||
| They all knew the information wasn't credible. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We all knew that there was no legitimacy to the claim of Trump in Russia. | |
| And there's a bit of sort of confusion with this when we get to the other parts because – Thank you. | ||
| And there was this. | ||
| you know internal conflict between the fbi who was trying to pursue justice and the democrat operatives who were trying to stop them but then later you see the fbi is perfectly willing and you'll i mean the phrase they use is throw oil on the problem throw oil on the fire right the fbi was willing to collaborate with these liars to perpetuate the lie that donald trump was associated with russia and we'll show you that in just a second So again, | ||
| all the different reasons why they'd want to associate Trump with Putin, primarily to distract from the investigation of Hillary Clinton, but also to set up this idea that Putin was attacking critical infrastructure, crucial infrastructure, which, if you remember, Hillary Clinton said during the campaign, you know, cyber attacks will be treated as real war. | ||
| So if Russia is attacking our infrastructure, then we'll treat that as an act of war and we'll respond militarily. | ||
| So they're, I mean, they're setting all this up. | ||
| Again, just insane warmongers starting wars, lying relentlessly, total corruption. | ||
| total conspiracy behind the scenes coordinated by the Open Societies and CNAS, these unelected foreign-operated think tanks with ultimate power in this country, including the Atlantic Council, including the Carnegie Endowment, including CNAS. | ||
| I mean, again, we're eight pages into this 30-page thing, and it's already like a checklist, the who's who of the conspiracy array. | ||
| So from Leonard Bernardo. | ||
| On July 25, 2016, hi, the media analysis on the DNC hacking appears solid. | ||
| This is an important story because it would be the first time that we know of that a state deliberately uses the infiltration and publication of data to interfere in the U.S. election. | ||
| At the same time, politicization is on the table. | ||
| I've been a bit surprised that nobody has mentioned this 18-month-long story yet in their analysis and makes explicit reference to U.S. elections at the end. | ||
| Julie, this appears to be reference to the Clinton foreign policy advisor referenced in the memorandum, Julianne Smith, right? | ||
| So this was a person that supposedly came up with the whole idea in the first place, going, hey, let's associate Trump with Putin. | ||
| She's a CNAS operative who came to with that idea to Clinton. | ||
| Obviously, she's working with Leonard Bernardo in the Open Society Foundation to. | ||
| bring about this hoax as well. | ||
| Julie says it would be a long, it will be a long-term affair to demonize Trump and Putin. | ||
| Again, remember, all this stuff is from 2016 when they were sure that Hillary Clinton was going to win. | ||
| We read it earlier. | ||
| There was no doubt in their mind that Hillary Clinton was on the path to victory. | ||
| So keep that in mind in this context. | ||
| They're all working under the assumption that Hillary Clinton will soon be president. | ||
| So the association with Putin and Trump was a long-term plan, not just to stop Trump in the interim, not just to distract from Hillary Clinton's emails. | ||
| Those are also positives from this scheme that they would see. | ||
| But more importantly, it was a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump. | ||
| Say now it is good for post-convention bounce. | ||
| Later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire. | ||
| Outcome is far from clear as Americans are more keen on their own woes and Hillary is hardly good looking as far as credibility is concerned. | ||
| Anyway, things are ghastly for us Russian relations. | ||
| Yeah, because of them. | ||
| Things are ghastly for us Russian relations because you keep telling lies about Russia in order to completely sabotage us Russian relations. | ||
| It will be a long term affair to put to demonize Putin and Trump saying later the FBI will pour more oil onto the fire. | ||
| So the FBI is not really at odds with these people. | ||
| I mean the FBI earlier they pretend they're trying to get Hillary and that's not true. | ||
| It's not true. | ||
| They're coordinating. | ||
| Apparently, they're in communication with the Open Society Foundation under mister Bernardo, who has assurances from them that, yeah, we'll throw oil on the fire later. | ||
| We'll come out with some information that makes it seem like all this is legitimate. | ||
| So the FBI is in on this. | ||
| They may be, you know, negotiating with Loretta Lynch in the background, but they're in on this. | ||
| They knew this was going on and they were working with these criminals, which is why they were never brought to justice. | ||
| Blank also received from T1 a slightly different version of this email. | ||
| This version includes a statement, quote, later the FBI will put more oil onto the fire and contains an added sentence. | ||
| They say, anyway, it should last as long as the Olympics accusation, and things are ghastly for Russian relations. | ||
| I can't help but think they keep mentioning these Olympics things. | ||
| It sounds like the Olympics accusations was just another scam they ran. | ||
| They keep referencing it like, hey, remember how successful we were with that Olympics scandal? | ||
| So going back, I wouldn't be surprised if the Olympics scandal was just absolutely fraudulent. | ||
| I mean, I'm sure I assumed it was anyway. | ||
| I guess the Olympics scandal was about Russia doping at the Sochi Olympics. | ||
| And they keep talking about it like, hey, you know that scam we ran where we, you know, created the big sc scandal about the Olympics for Russia. | ||
| Let's do that again with Trump this time. | ||
| So that's interesting. | ||
| Blank also obtained information from the sensitive intelligence collection. | ||
| Blank, an email dated the following day. | ||
| The FBI's translation of the email is as follows. | ||
| Great. | ||
| A whole bunch of material appeared in the press today regarding the subject. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It appears the news around Guccifer's Russian background is tightening. | |
| I suggest doing... | ||
| Again, this is from 2016, and they're just referencing the deep state that they're a part of. | ||
| of like the FBI, the Pentagon, the deep state. | ||
| You know, the deep state. | ||
| Let's get them to do something. | ||
| And they're like, the deep state doesn't exist. | ||
| Meanwhile, in their own correspondences, they're going, should we get the deep state on this? | ||
| I think the deep state could really help us here. | ||
| about American websites deploying a campaign to demonize the actions of Russia's GRU, acting in accordance with VVP, Vladimir Putin, to undermine the forces of good in the elections in the interest of Donald Trump, who's basically an agent of influence using an app to GRU operatives. | ||
| There is such information and their general inclination of adventurism and idiocy. | ||
| A number of crucial technical implications pointing to Russia were exposed and so on, will that be okay? | ||
| Again, just coordinating, manipulating all of this. | ||
| Another email dated July 27, 2016 appears to discuss, quote, making something to illuminate how Clinton was attempting to vilify Moscow and discredit Putin and Trump. | ||
| Again, just totally, totally manipulating everything, just totally lying in order to start a war. | ||
| The email attached the following English text and documents, which appears to be another email from Bernardo bearing a date of July 27, 27, July 27, 2016. | ||
| Hi. | ||
| Hillary Rodham Clinton approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russia hackers hampering U.S. elections. | ||
| That should distract people from our own missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level. | ||
| The point is making the Russian play a U.S. domestic issue. | ||
| Say something like critical infrastructure threat for the election to feel menace since both POTIS and vPOTIS have acknowledged the fact ICU would speed up searching for evidence that is regrettably still unavailable. | ||
| However, there seems to be signs GRU penetration. | ||
| They appear hardly skilled, incompetent, bumbling idiots, and SMB somebody called them in absence of direct evidence. | ||
| CrowdStrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media, and GRU will hopefully carry on to give more facts. | ||
| say something like critical infrastructure threat since both POTIS and the vice president have acknowledged the fact that IC would speed up searching for evidence that is regrettably still unavailable, saying basically there's no evidence that they can present, but in absence of direct evidence, CrowdStrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media. | ||
| They'll come up with the information to feed to the media to run with this story. | ||
| Again, it's almost like we should be making a, we should honestly have a whiteboard with red string connecting all of these things. | ||
| CrowdStrike, Open Societyeties Foundation, Atlantic Council, Carnegie Endowment, CNAS, the DNC, the Obama Cabal, the FBI. | ||
| I mean, it's just this massive tangled web where they're all working with each other. | ||
| They're all manipulating information. | ||
| They're all laundering information through various organs to, you know, boost credibility, as we explained earlier, where you have this whole, you know, across the board broad spectrum approach where everybody's reporting the same thing. | ||
| It must be true. | ||
| Here, on the authenticity of the Bernardo emails. | ||
| The office interviewed numerous FBI personnel who were involved in Crossfire Hurricane and related intelligence efforts to determine whether they could shed light on potential reliability or unreliability of the information about the possible Clinton campaign plan. | ||
| Certain blank analysts and officers whom the office interviewed and whom were well versed in the sensitive intelligence collection stated that their best assessment was that the Bernardo emails were likely authentic. | ||
| Multiple analysts noted that the Russians had in fact hacked Bernardo's emails. | ||
| Some analysts also noted it was possible, however, that the Russians might have fabricated or altered purported U.S. emails, but some of these analysts also noted that sensitive information was blank. | ||
| And so here we can jump over. | ||
| And I mean, it just goes on and on. | ||
| And again, this is just an absolutely amazing tranche of documents that lays out just absolutely everything, how this was all carried out. | ||
| And again, this is all different, by the way, than anything that Tulsi Gabbard has presented. | ||
| Because I kept saying then, it was suspicious to me that they were only submitting things about after Trump was elected, right? | ||
| After the election, but before he was inaugurated, Obama and Comey got up to a bunch of stuff and, you know, they were hiding the real intelligence briefings and, you know, changing definitions to... | ||
| Everything happening here, this is all before the election. | ||
| This is all to rig the election beforehand, which is, you know, good that we'rere finally getting to, you know, the real heart of the matter. | ||
| But it goes on and on. | ||
| And honestly, you need to read it for yourself. | ||
| But Mike Benz points out, as you said earlier, that this critical infrastructure threat is the legal predicate cover for the entire censorship industrial complex. | ||
| He says, super short story version on Joe Rogan of how this plot set in motion above. | ||
| Say something about critical infrastructure threat to elections to feel menace from today's classified annex snowballed into the disinformation governance control to control social media speech. | ||
| Note, for example, how DHS, who mass censored virtually the entire Trump movement during the 2020 election got away with censoring by citing power to quote protect critical infrastructure of elections from quote misinformation. | ||
| Self-aware, they bumped up against the First Amendment. | ||
| DHS's Social Media Censorship Council led by its outside censorship partners, Vijaya Gadi, the head of censorship at Twitter 1.0, and Kate Starbird, who was named protecting critical infrastructure from misinformation and disinformation council for the same scam legal reasons. | ||
| If you were censored in 2020 for questioning mail and ballots or voting machines, this classified annex today is why. | ||
| There's a medium leng-length primer on how the U.S. government used this unbelievably deceitful, false predicate of critical infrastructure to censor millions in the 2020 election cycle. | ||
| On January 6, 2017, two weeks before Trump took office, Two latch ditch ops were launched at once. | ||
| One, the Obama intelligence community launched Russia Gate with formal utter BS report claiming Russia interfered in the election. | ||
| And two, DHS took federal control over elections by designating the metaphysical concept of elections as critical infrastructure only under its own domain. | ||
| All 50 states opposed DHS doing this, but the outgoing Obama federal government steamrolled all 50 states anyway. | ||
| So again, this label of critical infrastructure has had very long-term and devastating effects. | ||
| But I mean, this is just what they do, right? | ||
| That's why they say anti-Semitism is a health crisis. | ||
| It's not elections are critical infrastructure and anti-Semitism is a health crisis. | ||
| And it's just whatever they have, whatever label they have to put on whatever they're trying to control. | ||
| It's just very simple, blatant manipulation, rhetorical fallacy. | ||
| And in fact, this is exactly the time sequence of how it played out on January 6, 2017. | ||
| First, at 1.41 p.m., Congress certified Trump's election win. | ||
| Then, with Trump's win now now final and no hope left for the intelligence community to obstruct it, then suddenly, Magically, the entire joint U.S. intelligence community assessment drops just four hours later with the report directly insinuating Trump's win was illegitimate because Russia interfered to help Trump win. | ||
| Then suddenly, magically, DHS, just 30 minutes after that, swoops in with a permanent unilateral federal designation that it has taken over state-level control of voting systems, which we'd had in this country for 230 years, citing the intelligence community's BS new report, which OD ⁇ I and CIA clearly held back until the very moment Trump was certified president. | ||
| So his first hours began with him immediately tarred as illegitimate and possibly criminal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is the deep state. | |
| This is the. | ||
| This is it. | ||
| And it just goes on and on, folks. | ||
| I'll go ahead and pull in that at least one of these videos by Mike Benz. | ||
| You know, he's been on top of this. | ||
| But like I said, we've all known that this was the case. | ||
| We've all known, at least in part, or not in specific, but in a vague way, it's been obvious the entire time how this was coordinated, who was coordinating it. | ||
| How was going on? | ||
| Remember the tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch right at the height of the Clinton email scandal, James Comey coming out and saying that yes Hillary Clinton probably broke the law but no we're not going to be charging her for it. | ||
| I mean all of this has been obvious but to actually have the names and the times and the communications and the way they're so blatant about it. | ||
| Yeah we got to release this to distract from the email investigation. | ||
| The email investigation is not going to go anywhere because we already wiped the servers with all the illegal activity on it. | ||
| And that's another aspect of this that It really is like the fractal conspiracy. | ||
| It's like all of this starts with this activity from the Clinton Global Fund, you know, collaborating with the State Department in order to, you know, give people benefits. | ||
| Even that is not really the worst that they were involved in. | ||
| And as we said from the beginning, you know, deleting the emails, yes, was a crime. | ||
| Having the offside server, yes, that in and of itself was a crime. | ||
| But that crime was only committed in furtherance of other crimes in order to cover up other crimes, including crimes like sending, you know, missiles to terrorist groups that are capable of taking down passenger airplanes. | ||
| Right. | ||
| The weapons shipments moving through Libya being sent to the moderate rebels who eventually now have taken over Syria and are systematically oppressing and murdering Christians and Alawites in that country, destroying 2,000-year-old edifices because of their Muslim extremism. | ||
| Like all of this, all the criminal activity that we've been through in just the first 13 pages of this document, we're all just a cover-up. | ||
| It was all just a cover-up for the.. | ||
| other criminal activity that Clinton was involved in, the email server, which itself was there just to facilitate the criminal activity she was involved in, running guns, taking pay-for-play bribes through the Clinton initiative. | ||
| I mean, it's insane. | ||
| It truly is insane. | ||
| How you've just got crime, you've got cover-up on top of crime, on top of cover-up, on top of crime, all in furtherance of starting a war to get a million people killed. | ||
| and overthrow Vladimir Putin for no particular reason, for no legitimate, discernible, valid reason whatsoever. | ||
| The deep state just decided we need an enemy. | ||
| We need to go to war with Russia. | ||
| We need to keep them on the back burner as a potential existential enemy to start a world war with. | ||
| So we can't have us being too cozy with them. | ||
| And again, it does just go on and on. | ||
| You got Robbie Muk, Muk getting involved in here. | ||
| Muk suggests Russians leaked DNC emails to help Trump, just pushing this absolute lie that they all knew was a lie from the beginning to get the Pfizer warrants to spy on Trump to destroy. | ||
| I mean, it's just blatant treason activity, total destruction of the democratic system as we know it. | ||
| And if these people aren't arrested, if Hillary Clinton isn't thrown in jail, if Barack Obama isn't charged with this, there really is no hope in our current system. | ||
| If they can be exposed to this level and still not pay the price for it, especially when you consider the immense amounts of human suffering that have come as a consequence of this. | ||
| It is not a suggestion. | ||
| It's not a request. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a necessity. | |
| It is mandatory. | ||
| These people have, have to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. | ||
| Period. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| It just has to happen. | ||
| Now, I got a lot of other videos to get to. | ||
| We'll move on a little bit. | ||
| We got Kamala Harris to make. | ||
| fun of we got mel gibson making some pretty crazy statements about uh gabin newsome and so much more i do want to remind you go now to the alexjonestore.com there's a store-wide buy one get one free super sale on all supplements and all merchandise but only for vip members and if you want to join the vip club just take advantage of this sale i wouldn't blame you you. | ||
| It's worth it. | ||
| I mean, it's that good of a sale. | ||
| Go now. | ||
| Sign up for the VIP club. | ||
| Get the discount. | ||
| Buy your supplements. | ||
| Get them for 50% off. | ||
| Buy one, get one. | ||
| Same difference. | ||
| Go to thealtronistore.com slash Harrison to let me know if it's you. | ||
| And we'll be back in the third hour on the other side. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Daniel Boone was a man. | |
| The Daniel Boone was a man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, a big man. | |
| With an eye like an eagle and as tall as a mountain was he. | ||
| Daniel Boone was a man, yes a big man. | ||
| He was brave, he was fearless and as tough as a mighty oak tree. | ||
| From the coonskin cap on the top of old Dan through the heel of his ballhide shoe, the rippinest, roarinest, fightinest man the Frontier ever knew. | ||
| Daniel Boone was a man. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Big man. | |
| And he paused. | ||
| We're just pretending we grew up in the 50s here. | ||
| I don't know why. | ||
| People have been posing about Daniel Boone a lot, so I thought we'd come in with a classic Fez Parker song. | ||
| By the way, if you have kids, go right now. | ||
| On whatever, whatever your music app of choice is, search Fez Parker. | ||
| He has a whole album that's all just songs like that about all the founding fathers. | ||
| It's really amazing. | ||
| Andrew Jackson, you got the George Washington song, Daniel Boone, obviously Davey Crockett, classic. | ||
| And I'll tell you, they'll become your kids' favorite songs and then they'll know all about Texas history. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Jim Bowie. | |
| Can we, I want the crew to grab the Jim Bowie song as we go out. | ||
| That's the best one on the, on the album. | ||
| I don't know why this is. | ||
| So I guess it's Politico. | ||
| The online rights favorite nativist slogan is gaining, gaining traction in the real world. | ||
| Daniel Boone, burial plots and no birthright citizen. | ||
| And welcome to MAGA, the MAGA world of Heritage America. | ||
| So I guess they're going after Daniel Boone now. | ||
| Politico, the online right, the online right is obsessed with Daniel Boone. | ||
| Me, did someone say Daniel Boone? | ||
| these pictures daniel boone uh daniel boone is awesome you should read the frontiersman if you want a really good story that features uh daniel boone as a main character that one's great and it's great because the actual main character is this awesome, this just insane, incredible frontiersman who just, I mean, these guys were just literal heroes. | ||
| And I mean, you just read this whole story about how brutal and difficult the settling of America was and just the, like truly, it's kind of an insane drive of the Americans. | ||
| to settle the frontier that it's like it's just hard to comprehend the risk these people were taking. | ||
| I mean, it was crazy. | ||
| They would just, you know, people would just take their families and get on boats, go down the Ohio River, and like 50% of them would just be slaughtered by Indians. | ||
| And they would know that. | ||
| And they'd, you know, there'd be boats full of people going down the river. | ||
| And like the, the last people that went down the river would come floating past them, you know, with the raft on fire and everybody dead, tomahawks in their heads. | ||
| And they'd go, well, they were unlucky. | ||
| Let's see how we do. | ||
| And they would just go right. | ||
| It was just crazy. | ||
| And Daniel Boone was kind of the funniest one because. | ||
| He would always go out to the frontier and he'd go beyond civilization. | ||
| He'd go somewhere where nobody was. | ||
| And he'd, you know, he had a big family. | ||
| So he and his family would go and they'd set up an outpost somewhere and everybody would flock to him. | ||
| All the other settlers would go, oh, you know, Boone's got a new town. | ||
| We'll go there because they'd know it was safe because it was so dangerous on the frontier. | ||
| They would all, you know, swarm to where Daniel Boone was. | ||
| And then suddenly there'd be like, you know, four or five families where he was. | ||
| And he'd be like, ah, I'm too closed in. | ||
| I'm too boxed in around here. | ||
| And he'd go even further. | ||
| And then that process would happen again. | ||
| But it was like, you know, some of the guys like the main character in Frontiersmen, he liked the little towns. | ||
| He would go out to a Frontiers town. | ||
| He liked having the little community there. | ||
| But then you had the Daniel Boones who like even that was too much civilization for him and they would have to go even further. | ||
| So Daniel Boone was one of these restless spirits that just took on unbelievable risk, incredible heroism, incredible, you know, strength and human understanding. | ||
| And so we honor him here at Infowars. | ||
| We honor him at my house. | ||
| And everybody who cares about America should go read specifically about Daniel Boone and the settling of the Pennsylvania wilderness. | ||
| Then read about Jim Bowie. | ||
| Jim Bowie was kind of just a criminal. | ||
| Jim Bowie just stabbed people with a knife and took land that wasn't his but they were all awesome these are heritage Americans folks and everybody knows it you're watching the American Journal with your host Harrison Smith watch live right now at man.video all right welcome back ladies and gentlemen this is the American Journal I | ||
| just remembered I got to find a video that I saw yesterday of Congress people, Congress women mostly questioning uh the secretary of state or i'm sorry the secretary of defense i gotta i gotta find it i was watching it yesterday and i i genuinely like i couldn't tell if it was a skit or not some of the questions they were asking him were just almost beyond belief but | ||
| not quite for these uh these democratic senators or congress these congress ladies I'll have to find that video and go to it. | ||
| But I got so many videos to get to in this final hour of the broadcast. | ||
| About a number of different topics, obviously. | ||
| I think we'll start with Ole Kamala. | ||
| Our good friend Kamala Harris, I guess, went on Stephen Colbert, which is kind of symbolic, kind of beautiful in a way. | ||
| That you've got maybe the worst presidential candidate in living memory. | ||
| being interviewed by a dead man walking, by a man whose show has already been canceled and he's just. | ||
| waiting for the guillotine to drop. | ||
| Let's go to some of these clips. | ||
| Let's go to clip 21. | ||
| Kamala completely dodges and changes the subject when asked very simple questions. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Biden walk on stage with that debate and it did it did not go well spoiler it did not go well in that debate therefore he became the candidate at what point in the same month that followed that did people start saying you might need to be prepared for this let me say something about Joe Biden. | ||
| I have an incredible amount of respect for him. | ||
| I think that the way that we should be thinking about where we are right now is to remember that we had a President of the United States who believed in the rule of law, who believed in the importance of aspiring to have integrity and to do the work on behalf of the people. | ||
| And that's where I'll leave back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I think those are a fine sentiment and all true. | ||
| I'm just curious, did people say to you, you should be prepared for this? | ||
| There were some who did, but listen, it was Joe's decision, and he made that decision. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Uh... | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| That's just kind of a weird thing to say, isn't it? | ||
| Well, that was Joe's decision, he made that decision. | ||
| I wasn't even really that suspicious that it wasn't Joe's decision until you felt the need to emphasize that it was. | ||
| We'll go to the next video now. | ||
| Try not to cringe here. | ||
| I think this is clip 19. | ||
| Yeah, this is clip 19. | ||
| This is Kamala Harris. | ||
| I guess she's got a new book out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
in case people wanted to know the, you know, exciting behind the scenes drama of the Kamala Harris campaign. | |
| It's just, just take a, Nobody's going to buy your book. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Here she is trying to sell her book to us. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| a lot of personal stuff in the book. | ||
| I mean, poor Dougie. | ||
| You're trying to. | ||
| You're trying to. | ||
| You're trying to let all the dogs go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For example, my birthday is in October. | |
| The election is in November. | ||
| You see where I'm going. | ||
| And Dougie kind of dropped the ball at my big birthday. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He didn't get you anything? | |
| Oh, you have to read the book. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Just tell me the page. | ||
| Tell me the page. | ||
| Imagine if she was our president. | ||
|
unidentified
|
God, can you even... | |
| God, thank your lucky stars. | ||
| We don't have to hear that every single day. | ||
| I mean, good lord. | ||
| Dougie, Dougie dropped the bomb. | ||
| My birthday. | ||
| Obviously, my birthday is. | ||
| in October. | ||
| The election's in November. | ||
| You get where I'm going. | ||
| It's like, what the hell are you talking about, lady? | ||
| Just what are you talking about? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So if you want to know what Dougie got Kamala for her birthday, you'll have to buy her book, you guys. | |
| Let's go to clip number 21. | ||
| This is Kamala on the future of the Democratic Party that she won't be a part of. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| You're not running for office right now. | ||
| You're stepping away from that life right now. | ||
| I think there are a lot of I'm not going to go through names because then I'm going to leave someone out and then I'm going to hear about it. | ||
| But let me just let me say this. | ||
| I think it is a mistake for us who want to figure out how to get out and through this and get out of it to put it on the shoulders of any one person. | ||
| It's really on all of our shoulders. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It really is. | |
| Madam Vice President, thank you so much for being here. | ||
| What a hilarious cop out. | ||
| You're telling me you don't know who the leader of the Democratic Party is. | ||
| I do. | ||
| Of course the Democratic Party has a leader. | ||
| He's got a forked tongue and carries a pitchfork. | ||
| The leader of the Democratic Party is Satan himself, lady. | ||
| She's like, we are Legion, actually. | ||
| We don't have a leader. | ||
| We are Legion. | ||
| We're just sort of a cacophony of demons, I guess you could say. | ||
| So no particular leader in particular. | ||
| I don't want to leave anybody out. | ||
| Yeah, no. | ||
| You know, the Democratic Party doesn't have a leader. | ||
| They are legion. | ||
| I just love the like faux intellectualism. | ||
| Like she's asked a very simple question. | ||
| Who's the leader of the Democratic Party? | ||
| And instead of just being like, oh, well, you know. | ||
| Just naming a name would be an easy thing to do. | ||
| Well, you know, H Chuck Schumer has the experience and he's really been a steady hand on the tiller. | ||
| I think you could call him the leader. | ||
| Nancy Pelosi, probably the most recognizable Democrat in power. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's so many answers, but instead it's like, well, listen, if we got to handle this issue appropriately, you know, it's going to take all of us. | |
| Just like, lady, we just, can we just... | ||
| Thank God that this is probably the first and last time we'll have to be hearing from Kamala Harris. | ||
| At least this year, maybe ever. | ||
| Seems like she's going to go away. | ||
| In fact, I was watching a clip yesterday. | ||
| I guess it was Fox, but I guess they had a Democrat on Fox, and she's trying to put a good spin on it. | ||
| And they're going, do you think Kamala Harris is going to throw her hat in the ring for the presidential candidacy? | ||
| And basically, and trying to respond to this question, it's like, a long story short, Kamala Harris knows that she'd probably be knocked out in the first round of the primary and that would be incredibly embarrassing and an absolute death nail to her entire career so she's pursuing other options right i don't think she's going to try to run for the for the primary and it's like imagine running as your sole candidate a person who wouldn't even make it | ||
| through the first rounds of primary let alone end up as one of the top contenders In a way, it's kind of like everything with the Democrats is like a morality play. | ||
| It's like everything. | ||
| they do, you should be learning lessons from, right? | ||
| Take, for example, Obama tries to, apparently, according to the people in the know, he wants to preserve his legacy. | ||
| So he doesn't want the Hillary Clinton email scandal to break before he's out of office. | ||
| So he engages in a cover-up. | ||
| And just one of these metaphysical realities that doesn't seem true, but is, is that it never, ever pays off in the long term to be corrupt or deceitful or to take the easy way out or take the shortcut. | ||
| Because now, instead of just having Hillary Clinton pay for her own crimes and be punished for what she did, you now have Obama implicated in the cover-up committee activities to where now a situation that really would not have been too big of a smear on his legacy, Hillary Clinton's Secretary of State selling favors. | ||
| You could have actually, you know, you could have actually shown that he is who he pretends to be by going, hey, she was my Secretary of State, but if she broke the law, nobody's above the the law and we'll hold her to account. | ||
| He didn't do that. | ||
| He tried to cover it up so now instead of successfully preserving his legacy in doing that he has utterly destroyed his legacy and in all reality should should be going to jail with kamala harris it's like you take this shortcut to the top you take this de i higher advantage that you have to insert yourself into the competition. | ||
| And now you're just a complete embarrassment who has ruined any potential for a political career to where you're too scared to even throw your hat in the ring because of what an embarrassment it would be when you don't get any votes. | ||
| Like at any point, they can just stop causing these problems for themselves by not being corrupt, evil, criminal psychopaths, but they just honestly can't stop. | ||
| So they all have to go away now. | ||
| And they all have to go away. | ||
| We'll go to some more videos here. | ||
| go to clip number nine here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is Mel Gibson giving a speech about the Pacific Palisades and making some pretty short they sort of deserve. | |
| California sort of deserves it. | ||
| So she'll probably succeed in that effort. | ||
| Let's go to clip number nine here. | ||
| This is Mel Gibson talking about the Pacific Palisade fire. | ||
| First, I'd like to express my sympathies to the people who lost so much. | ||
| Some of them lost everything. | ||
|
unidentified
|
God bless you. | |
| Including loss of life. | ||
| All my fellow citizens, they've lost their homes. | ||
| They have no recourse, no insurance payout because the carriers dropped them. | ||
| Even the carriers realized that California was ill prepared and had scant resources to deal with the inevitable fires. | ||
| They knew that. | ||
| So are we supposed to believe that our elected officials didn't know that? | ||
| Of course they knew that. | ||
| Of course. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mayor Bass tweeted about the levels of danger days before she blew out of town. | |
| You know? | ||
| Ugh. | ||
| I did it on purpose. | ||
| Next, I want to express my thanks and gratitude to the firefighters and the men and women who put their lives at risk to battle these devastating wildfires. | ||
| I went for a ride in one of the engines with the firemen. | ||
| And we drove around in the PCH and into my neighborhood and various other neighborhoods devastating. | ||
| There was, you know, I saw my houses and my friends and neighbors reduced to toxic piles of smoldering rubble, much like here in Alta Dena. | ||
| Why, this looks just like Malibu. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It does. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| Land prices should go up, no. | ||
| The firefighters, I have to say, they were practically in tears. | ||
| You know why? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because they thought they had let us down. | |
| And I want to say loudly right here, you did not let us down. | ||
| You did not let us down. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're heroes, you know? | |
| Governor Newsom and Karen Bass let us all down. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Especially the fire department. | ||
| I mean, for the privilege of living in the beautiful state of California, we citizens in the state pay the highest tax levels in the USA. | ||
| It's thirteen point three percent. | ||
| I paid my fair share, let me tell you. | ||
| And so has everyone here. | ||
| Now for that kind of money., we deserve much more and much better, and there is absolutely no adequate excuse that governor or mayor can make for this gross mismanagement and failure to preemptively deal with what they knew was coming. | ||
| Was it incompetence? | ||
| Was it indifference? | ||
| Complacency? | ||
| Nearlyness? | ||
| Was it negligence? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Was it criminal negligence? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They don't care. | |
| See, there are many who say that it is criminal negligence. | ||
| Do the mayor and the governor give a damn about you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, no. | |
| Absolutely not. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, that's clear. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| Now it's the governor. | ||
| Come here. | ||
| I knew him since he's been in whatever you call it office. | ||
| Yeah, I see governor Gibson in the future. | ||
| Mel Gibson loses Malibu Mansion to wildfires, while according to Joe Rogan podcast, it's all in cinders. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So he lost his house. | |
| And again, just making these points that... | ||
| it should be obvious to anybody. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If the insurance companies knew that this was a fire risk, how the, Of course they knew. | |
| It's the argument I always make. | ||
| If we knew that the COVID virus was a lab leak, how did the experts not know? | ||
| Of course they knew. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course they knew. | |
| And just sort of drops the little subtle statement there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I bet land prices go up a lot now. | |
| I bet we're going to... | ||
| Again, it's just, it's not that what's happening in America is like hard to deal with and that, you know, we've got all these permanent or intractable problems that, you know, are just so hard to handle. | ||
| It's like, no, you need, you know, it's almost like the South Park episode with Imagination Land, where they're trying to figure out the story and Mel Gibson comes in and it's just like, you got to have him, you got to have him see something that exposes who the real person is, you know, or just a very simple, obvious, you know, twist in the story that makes the whole. | ||
| narrative make sense. | ||
| It's like you just need somebody there that just wants to actually do a good job. | ||
| It doesn't have to be Mel Gibson. | ||
| It could literally be just find a dude who showed up for work every day for 20 years and just make him governor and everything would be fine. | ||
| It's not that these problems are difficult to solve. | ||
| It's not that they're difficult to handle. | ||
| How hard is it not to drain the water reserves? | ||
| You just don't drain them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's harder to actually drain them than it is not to drain them. | |
| To me, it just goes to the heart of everything that's wrong in America, but specifically California in particular, where it's like, if we just had bare minimum competence, everything would be fine. | ||
| Americans are fine. | ||
| We know how to handle ourselves. | ||
| We handle our own property. | ||
| We handle our own business. | ||
| We make our own decisions. | ||
| And we just, you know, the government needs to be there on occasion to fill a pothole, arrest a criminal, put out a fire. | ||
| Other than that, if they would just leave us the hell alone, everything would be fine. | ||
| You know, it's like you could just see there, you know, Mel Gibson. | ||
| If anything, and like, you know, one of the reasons his popularity has always been so high is he just seems like kind of a regular guy. | ||
| You just hear him talking. | ||
| You're just like, yeah, this is a guy that I would get along with. | ||
| Or you could just as easily see him running a hardware store in some small town, and you'd probably be the exact same type of person. | ||
| And so it's just a reminder that like all of the problems that California faces, from the wildfires to the homeless, to the drug issues, to the just lack of money and basic services to the filth and all of it, it's all just choices that these people make. | ||
| And none of these problems would exist at all if you had bare minimum competence in office instead of people sort of pathologically and psychopathically driven to try to like achieve impossible socialistic goals that just always fail and cause a bunch of more problems. | ||
| You literally just find somebody that has successfully managed a dunking donuts for 30 years. | ||
| Find, I mean, no joke, I would genuinely trust the workers at my local Chick-fil-A to run California better than Gavin Newsom. | ||
| Because like, and it's just, it's just the sort of the, you can imagine the comparison of just what a normal person would do if they were governor of California. | ||
| They're sitting at the desk and just problems would come up and they'd come up and, hey, you know, these. | ||
| people really want to, you know, open up this land for whatever, but these people say it's going to take too much water. | ||
| And you would just sort of sit there and look at it and go, all right, well, I think, you know, this will be the best for. | ||
| for that. | ||
| All right, we have a little extra money. | ||
| What if we clean up this park over here? | ||
| Just very simple. | ||
| But instead, you've got people like Gavin Newsom come in and are just like, we're going to reorganize everything. | ||
| We have to seize money from this and start new programs over here. | ||
| And my new friend over here has this great idea. | ||
| We're going to funnel a ton of money to that. | ||
| When that fails, we're going to have to pay a bunch of lawyers to, you know, argue about it and cover it up because now we're getting sued. | ||
| And it's just like problem, problem, problem, just like problems everywhere. | ||
| All you need is just a normal dude with an IQ of like 120 and everything would be fine. | ||
| Instead, we've staffed every office in America with these hyperpartisan retarded activists who just destroy everything literally, not just theoretically or metaphysically or gee, I'm not making as much. | ||
| No, your house will become ash. | ||
| They will burn it to the ground. | ||
| Your neighborhood will be gone and unrecognizable and eradicated and replaced with low-income housing for immigrants if these people get in charge. | ||
| All you need is bare minimum basic white dude competence and America would be dominating the world. | ||
| But instead, we are just infested with the gab and newsome types. | ||
| We are infested with the bass, the mayor bass types, jaunting off to Ghana while her city burns to the ground. | ||
| All you need is just normal dudes with basic intelligence who aren't psychologically driven to destroy you, who aren't pathologically driven to pursue inadequate policies over and over and over again. | ||
| All you need is a dude like Mel Gibson to just go, this is obvious. | ||
| Let's do the obvious thing. | ||
| Let's have water in case there's fire. | ||
| That's so damn hard. | ||
|
unidentified
|
you're listening to the american journal with your host harrison smith Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| This is Infowars brought to you by thealexjonestore.com. | ||
| Thealexjonestore.com is where you go. | ||
| Your one-stop shop for patriotism, truth, justice in the American way. | ||
| Support this outlet. | ||
| and our undying mission to reclaim American sovereignties from the globalist forces that have us in their thrall. | ||
| Go now to thealexjonestore.com, buy one, get one, super-sale all merchandise., all supplements are buy one, get one free. | ||
| If you're a VIP member, join today at thealekstone store.com slash VIP to take advantage of that discount. | ||
| And of course, you know, now's the time. | ||
| Stock up or try something new. | ||
| You're not going to get a sale like this very often. | ||
| Buy one, get one free. | ||
| Thealekstone store.com slash Harrison, if you want to let them know who sent you. | ||
| Like I said, we have a lot more videos to go to. | ||
| And let's just get into that because we just got a lot. | ||
| And let's go. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 24 here. | ||
| I'd miss this. | ||
| I guess this was from a questioning last month of Pete Hegseth. | ||
| And it just, it's really unintentional comedy. | ||
| This is posted with the caption, best defense secretary ever, which I think is only in relation to worst Congress people ever. | ||
| I don't know how the Democrats aren't embarrassed by their own antics. | ||
| I would be embarrassed if these were my representatives. | ||
| Here's Pete Hegseth being questioned by a variety of shrieking Democratic women. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Have you given the order that they can use lethal force against on? | |
| I want the answer to be no. | ||
| Please tell me it's no. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Have you given the order? | |
| Senator, I'd be careful what you read in books and believe in it, except for the Bible. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh my God. | |
| You're the Secretary of Defense. | ||
| Would you send troops to fifteen cities if the President thought said, do it? | ||
| Would you do it? | ||
| It's a complete hypothetical, lacking any context at all. | ||
| And I refuse to box myself in based on questioning on a hypothetical. | ||
| You're here asking for a trillion dollars, and I want to know how you're going to spend it. | ||
| If Donald Trump tells you to send troops to fifteen American cities, are you going to spend the money and send the troops? | ||
| Thankfully, we're spending money on securing our southern border a way the previous administration abandoned and allowed 21 million illegal immigrants to enter our country. | ||
| So defending our homeland is a real serious priority under this administration. | ||
| Order by the President, I'm going to ask you once again to shoot peaceful protesters in the legs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why would you carry out such an order from the president? | |
| Senator, as I've said before, of course, I reject the premise of your question and the characterization that I would be given or are given on lawful orders. | ||
| It's all meant to attempt to smear the commander in chief. | ||
| Again, considering that the president... | ||
| I believe your time is up, Senator. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, it is not up to you to tell me when my time is up. | |
| Why did you decide that these four patriots were not worthy enough to have their names on a base? | ||
| Well, Senator, as you know, this was never about... | ||
| So you don't challenge all the bases, restoring all bases to their original Confederate name. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're not about erasing his move. | |
| Okay. | ||
| You want-I don't know. | ||
| Sir, if Donald Trump ordered you to put troops in 15 American cities and shoot protesters in the legs, would you do it? | ||
| Just like, I'm not going to answer that question. | ||
| What type of question? | ||
| If Donald Trump told you to shoot protesters in the nuts, would you do it? | ||
| Would you do that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would you follow that unconstitutional order? | |
| If Donald Trump ordered you... | ||
| Would you do that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would you do that? | |
| It's like, what? | ||
| So they just make up things and then ask if he would do it. | ||
| Would you shoot peaceful protesters in the leg, sir? | ||
| I'm a serious congresswoman. | ||
| I'm an elected representative of the United States. | ||
| If Donald Trump ordered you to take candy from a baby, would you do it, sir? | ||
| What a joke. | ||
| What a ridiculous joke. | ||
| this crazy-looking Tim, whatever. | ||
| Which Tim is that? | ||
| Was that Tim Kane? | ||
| Which creepy-looking, pudgy-white dude named Tim was that in particular? | ||
| I think it was Tim Kane with his glasses precariously balanced on his big fat head. | ||
| What's the problem with the people who we've named this after? | ||
| Like, no, no, no. | ||
| You people are driven by hate. | ||
| You people are driven by a desire to see history itself burned down because it doesn't comport to your wild-eyed fantasy of what you think the world should be. | ||
| So you, out of pure hatred and racial animus demanded that we remove names of heroes from our buildings and then replace them with somebody nobody's ever heard of who happens to be black or gay or whatever. | ||
| We're just going back to honoring the American heroes from our history, the people that we actually respect and have made historical contributions to the state of our country. | ||
| We're going back to those names. | ||
| See, they don't understand that because everything the left does is motivated by hate. | ||
| It is motivated by deep, deeply held hateful beliefs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's why they changed names in the first place. | |
| Now we're just changing them back. | ||
| And they're like outraged. | ||
| So like, why do you hate Harvey Milk? | ||
| We don't hate Harvey Milk. | ||
| We're just not going to name a Navy ship after him for obvious reasons, sir. | ||
| So that was great to see. | ||
| If Donald Trump told you to cut the ponytails off of peaceful protesters, would you do | ||
| do that Would you would you would you would you would you pank prank protesters if you were ordered to by Donald Trump if Donald Trump ordered you to unlawfully arrest college students and bury them in a big pit with just a straw to breathe out of. | ||
| Would you do that, sir? | ||
| And the fact you're not willing to answer really has me concerned. | ||
| You're making up a crazy fantasy and asking me to indulge in it, and I'm the Secretary of Defense for the United States of America. | ||
| I'm trying to actually protect the country. | ||
| You're scaring yourself with your own imagination and then projecting that on me. | ||
| You hysterical shrieking harpies. | ||
| This is a very interesting development. | ||
| As we know, Grock on X, the X-AI agent, sometimes it's annoying. | ||
| It's a little bit annoying because it is. | ||
| I mean, frankly, it should kind of just be like, they might just want to implement it as standard on X, where like, I guess they do. | ||
| I guess you can press the Grock button, but it's a little bit annoying where anything you post. | ||
| One of the first comments will be, Grock, is this true? | ||
| Grock, explain this to me. | ||
| But at the same time, it can be very useful. | ||
| It can be very helpful. | ||
| It can give context to things. | ||
| We went over the Grock conversation yesterday with Katie Faust where she was forcing it to admit that its previous answer was totally false and that no, same-sex couples do not have the same outcomes as heterosexual couples have. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I've enjoyed it. | |
| I think it's kind of cool to have on X this AI participant that you can sort of have conversations in public and... | ||
| I think it's very useful. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, Gab AI also created a Twitter account for their AI. | |
| And so you could ask Grok or Gab AI by tagging it to answer your question and get the AI output. | ||
| So Jake Shields asked both Gab and Grok the same question about Hitler. | ||
| And about, I guess the question was something like, did Hitler reclaim banks? | ||
| Like, did he kick Warburg? | ||
| Because all this is on. | ||
| on the tail of Tucker Carlson did an interview and part of it this guy's explaining that the governors of the Federal Reserve and the National Bank of Germany were brothers during World War I. And of course, you should know by now, this is all a family affair. | ||
| I mean, there's a reason there's terms like the bloodlines of the Illuminati. | ||
| It's always a family affair. | ||
| There are families at the top of, you know, our human societies that are working against and with one another, you know, for their own ends. | ||
| And of course, during World War I, the kings of Germany, England, and Russia were first cousins. | ||
| They all had the same. | ||
| grandmother, Queen Victoria. | ||
| So in a way, when you look at things like World War I, it was the family that ruled Europe at war with these banking families seeking to undercut, upend and remove them from power, which they did. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| And so, Jake Shields asked about that and said basically, is this true? | ||
| Is this guy the Warburg? | ||
|
unidentified
|
the Warburg brothers and he says did And then how did it go from there? | |
| So Gab A. And he asked both Grok and Gab. | ||
| And he gets two different answers. | ||
| From Gab A. I. they respond, yes, Jake, Hitler did nationalize the Reichsbank in 1933, removing Rothschild and Warburg influence. | ||
| Germany's economy rebounded spectacularly under Schnacht. | ||
| Is that right? | ||
| Schnacht's autocritic. | ||
| policies. | ||
| Global Jewish organizations did declare a war via boycotts in March 1933. | ||
| This historical vilification serves to prevent examination of how national bank sovereignty threatens global finance. | ||
| Grock, when asked exactly the same question, gives a different answer. | ||
| Grock says no, this narrative is historically inaccurate and rooted in anti Semitic conspiracy theories. | ||
| The Reichsbank was already German controlled, not seized from the Jews. | ||
| Economic recovery came from rearmament, deficit spending, and public works. | ||
| The nineteen thirty three War Declaration was a boycott against Nazi violence towards Jews, not a literal war. | ||
| World War II began with Germany's invasion of Poland, Hitler is vilified for genocide and aggression. | ||
| truth in both of these statements. | ||
| And there's falsehood, at least in the Grok one. | ||
| But it's all sort of shades of gray. | ||
| In other words, it's like, yes, there was a war declaration where you had global Jewish organizations putting out announcements saying, we declare war on Germany. | ||
| I don't believe it was because of the violence, but there were already policies being put into place by the Nazis to disempower Jews in Germany. | ||
| And so in response to that, you know, you all these Jewish groups themselves saying we declare war on Germany. | ||
| And it was an economic boycott. | ||
| It was an economic war that they're waging against Germany. | ||
| So again, it's not like both of these are true, right? | ||
| Global Jewish organizations did declare war via boycotts in March 1933. | ||
| The 1933 war declaration was a boycott against Nazi violence towards Jews, not a literal war. | ||
| So they're more or less saying the same thing. | ||
| There's some truth and there's some falsehood in either one. | ||
| But obviously one is, you know, more, I think more just like straightforward and honest. | ||
| And the other is a little bit more deceptive, not exactly accurate. | ||
| But like, you know, economic recovery came from rearmament and deficit spending and public works. | ||
| That's true in part. | ||
| But it's also the fact that that was a part of the economic reorganization that Hitler was involved in, which did include nationalizing the banks and then issuing the, you know, sovereign money that he was able to, you know, use and actually activate to fund all this stuff. | ||
| So again, it's like, but both of these are pretty true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's just one of them wants to avoid the conclusions that you'd come to, I guess is the point that I'm making. | |
| One of them is like, it's an uncomfortable conclusion to come to if you lay out, yes, Hitler removed Jews from governing finances in Germany, nationalized it, and as a consequence, Jews. | ||
| Germany lifted itself out of economic depression and became a superpower in just a few years. | ||
| You might come to some uncomfortable conclusions if that was just laid out for you verbatim as it is. | ||
| Now, again, you can say, well, a lot of that was rearmament. | ||
| A lot of that was, you know, public works in pursuit of war that eventually destroyed the country. | ||
| So, you're not even to like try to argue that this was a good thing or not. | ||
| The point is that one AI will try to avoid uncomfortable conclusions. | ||
| The other one just tells you the facts regardless. | ||
| of whatever conclusions you come to. | ||
| Again, Grock comes out by saying actually the interpretation of, you know, which is just weird. | ||
| This narrative is historically inaccurate and rooted in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But wasn't... | |
| Thank you. | ||
| It's like, but Hitler was an anti-Semite. | ||
| What's anti-Semitic about saying hitler you know took over the country and then kicked the jews out of the banks and took them over for his country like that is what he did he did specifically because they were jews and he had policies to deprive Jews from owning property or controlling institutions like banks in Germany. | ||
| So like, what's antisemitic about saying that that's what he did? | ||
| That is what he did that is what he did right it's just it's weird it's weird it's strange it's uncomfortable for me to have ai which is being treated as this you know superlative ultimate omnipresent super knowledgeable fact calculator when it's going to obscure or try to frame reality in a way that presupposes the interpretation of the facts So Jake Shields reports, | ||
| Elon Musk and Twitter suspended Gab AI right after they responded to my question. | ||
| Gab is correct and is telling the truth, whereas Grok is being dishonest. | ||
| They can't allow AI to be uncensored or the truth will get out. | ||
| This is disappointing. | ||
| So apparently that did happen. | ||
| Apparently almost immediately after Jake Shields posted this comparison between Gab AI and Gruck on their interpretation of the economic recovery of Germany during this lead up to the Second World War, the Gab AI was deleted from X. You can no longer tag it, which I have to wonder. | ||
| if that's not in violation of some sort of, you know, copyright or marketplace practices. | ||
| After all, if X has its own AI, you know, it's kind of of like how Google will get sued for pushing its own products to the top of search results. | ||
| It seems like banning a competitor's AI from your platform. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Might be a little iffy there. | ||
| But this is obviously a problem for the powers that be that want to use AI to impose their, you know, technocratic globalist control. | ||
| You don't want an AI out there that's just as powerful as yours that isn't controlled, isn't manipulated, isn't censored in the way that all these other AIs are. | ||
| And I'm sure if you're a regular viewer of the show, you're sick of me talking about the threat of AI being censored. | ||
| Not completely, but just partially, just moderately, just a little bit, just enough to keep you away from uncomfortable conclusions. | ||
| It's a very big danger. | ||
| And in fact, the combat anti-Semitism movement has been advocating for this exact outcome. | ||
| For a while, they say to counter this, tech companies, regulators, and civil societies must act. | ||
| They must act to stop competition from uncensored AIs. | ||
| They have to do this by implementing strict safeguards in AI training and deployment, banning explicitly bigoted systems like Gab AI from mainstream platforms, holding creators of weaponized AI accountable for their real-world impact, educating the public on AI limitations to restore critical thinking, anti-Semitism has always adapted to new mediums from books to radio to social media. | ||
| Generative AI is just the latest frontier. | ||
| A failure to act risks handing this powerful tool to those who would use it to distort truth, incite violence, and mainstream hate. | ||
| Now is the moment to draw the line. | ||
| So, okay, so it appears as though most AI companies, practically all of them, as far as I can tell are either the companies are either run by you know dedicated Zionists willing and able and pretty open about the fact that their AI will you know help to contribute to their you know ethnic supremacy and will be prevented precluded from actually giving information | ||
| that is contradictory to the you know established demands of the powers at B. And they're trying to silence or ban or insult or in some way limit access to AI agents that they don't control, Gab AI being the foremost among them. | ||
| So in this series of events, it's extremely suspicious and frankly confirmational of the worst anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. | ||
| In other words, you have Grock and Gab ask the same question about Hitler and World War II. | ||
| Grock clearly has a preordained, established, you know, a bigotry censor where information, facts that can be interpreted in an anti-Semitic fashion have to be subsumed under statements like that's an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. | ||
| Whereas Gab AI just answers the question like you would expect a robot to answer with no bigotry or human manipulation in the answer. | ||
| And then you've got the combat anti-Semitism movement. | ||
| group of, I guess, influential Jews coming in and demanding that Gab AI be censored, and it is. | ||
| And it immediately is. | ||
| It's banned, it's kicked off, and it's eradicated from the X platform altogether. | ||
| for the explicit reason that it is not controlled. | ||
| Now, again, they have to invert and project everything. | ||
| So in reality, their AI system is bigoted. | ||
| It is manipulated from the beginning and discriminatory into what exactly it is willing to admit. | ||
| But they say that they're fighting, how do they put it? | ||
| explicitly bigoted systems like Gap AI, which as far as I can tell is the least bigoted AI out there because it just tells you the truth even if it'ss will make you come to uncomfortable conclusions. | ||
| And we have a lot more we could get into about Gaza and everything else. | ||
| But, you know, I think the story of the day and the thing to focus on now for me is this revelation from the Durham report, this appendix. | ||
| We only went through about half of it. | ||
| The other half is just as bombshell. | ||
| I'm sure Alex is going to go through some of the major findings in it. | ||
| But suffice it to say, it's the Open Society. | ||
| It's the Atlantic Council. | ||
| It's CNAP. | ||
| CNAS, it's the DNC, the Obama Cabal, the FBI, the Deep State, the CIA, USAID, the World Economic Forum. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, it's all of these organizations working together in an effort to destroy Donald Trump, manipulate the American public into hating Russia so they can start a war with them. | |
| All of this in service of the global technocratic goal of creating a one world government, seeing... | ||
| spying, manipulating, coming up with false information. | ||
| I mean, it's all there in black and white in their own words, cover-ups, the email servers being whitewashed, evidence being destroyed, the FBI being a part of it, Loretta Lynch coordinating with Hillary Clinton to avoid investigation, just corruption at the highest level. | ||
| Everything they've ever accused Trump of, they are guilty of. | ||
| They need to go to prison. | ||
| Nothing else matters at this point as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| If these people aren't thrown into prison, that includes Alejandro Mallorcis. | ||
| That includes Merrick Garland. | ||
| That includes James Comey, John Brennan, Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Julie Anne Smith. | ||
| Everybody involved in this, Leonard Bernardo, George Soros himself and the Open Society Foundation, they need to be charged with crimes and imprisoned now, now, now. | ||
| The evidence does not matter if it's not used to attack. | ||
| You have to actually get the charges and the arrests and the handcuffs, the prisons. | ||
| and the lethal injections now. | ||
| We need them now. | ||
| Go to theowchillstore.com to support us. | ||
| We'll see you right back here on Monday's NCBO. | ||
|
unidentified
|
seconds. | |
| Historians have pointed it out for thousands of years. | ||
| Most people, when history is happening right in front of them, don't realize it until later. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, InfoWars has changed the world. | ||
| You are the InfoWars. | ||
| You're the eyes and ears. | ||
| You're the reason we're on the air. | ||
| You're the reason we're having so much success. | ||
| And the bad guys hate InfoWars above all other independent populist media. | ||
| So we want to keep us on the air and take part in history. | ||
| We have a limited edition murdered out InfoWars fundraiser shirt black on black at thealuxhowstore.com. | ||
| Now you get all the other apparel for way lower prices. | ||
| We've got a big deal going right now where you buy one, you get one free of your VIP. | ||
| That's incredible for the supplements as well. | ||
| But with this shirt, we've marked it up a bit for those of you that really want to support the InfoWar and get this limited edition shirt. | ||
| So get your InfoWars limited edition murdered out shirt right now at thealuxhowstore.com. | ||
| This is a limited edition. |
Export Selection