Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| On July 23, 2025, President Trump signed three executive orders aimed at solidifying U.S. leadership in artificial intelligence, with one specifically targeting the acceleration of data center construction. | ||
| The new policy promotes the use of federal lands, including Brownfield and Superfund sites. | ||
| Brownfield and Superfund sites are basically former industrial sites, generally found in urban areas that are complicated by the potential presence of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. | ||
| A $500 billion private sector partnership has already been formed with companies like OpenAI, Oracle, and SoftBank to construct up to 20 AI data centers across the United States. | ||
| Meanwhile, Meta has unveiled ambitious plans to build massive AI data centers, including the Hyperion project in Louisiana, projected to scale up to 5 gigawatts of computational power over several years, and the Prometheus cluster in Ohio, set to come online in 2026 with 1 gigawatt and 500,000 GPUs. | ||
| Additionally, Meta is developing multiple Titan clusters, with each facility's footprint rivaling significant portions of Manhattan. | ||
| Additionally, data centers use water for cooling servers and other IT equipment to prevent overheating. | ||
| A hyperscale center can guzzle 3 to 5 million gallons per day. | ||
| In 2021, data centers collectively consumed 449 million gallons per day, while the rest of America consumed 39 billion gallons per day. | ||
| So data centers used roughly an additional 1% of water resources. | ||
| But as small as these numbers are today, the AI data center juggernaut is inevitably barreling headlong into a water-starved future. | ||
| And the battleground is smack dab in America's driest regions. | ||
| Out in the southwest, Arizona is a ticking time bomb. | ||
| Phoenix and Mesa are drowning in data centers while the Colorado River chokes. | ||
| Google is already gulping millions of gallons a day, elbowing out farmers and folks just trying to keep their taps running. | ||
| California's Central Valley and Southern Sprawl are getting hammered to with new server farms piling onto a state already choked by drought. | ||
| Then there's Texas. | ||
| Abilene staring down the barrel of OpenAI's Stargate Behamath, a project set to suck up water in a state where droughts are legendary and farmers are fighting for scraps. | ||
| Over in Georgia, places like Newton County are already paying the price. | ||
| Wells running dry, water turning to sludge, and a looming deficit by 2030. | ||
| Virginia is currently the king of data centers with northern Virginia's server farms multiplying like roaches, draining resources while locals and industries beg for relief. | ||
| Some outfits are tinkering with air cooling or recycling water, but it's a drop in the bucket against the tidal wave of AI's thirst set to explode by 2027. | ||
| But then there's no lobbying group, no environmental group, no group saying this summer in the real studies by the major five power grids that they're all on the verge of collapse just because of AI data centers, including the main East Coast grid, | ||
| the biggest, but they say global warming, you'll have blackouts, the power is about to go out, but they never say in those articles, it's because AI is already slurping up 40% of the power produced in the United States while they shut down the power plants. | ||
| So you don't get power, but AI gets all the power it ever wants because they're paving the way for it because it will control everything we do, but only the power we give it. | ||
| New categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act and Streamlined Clean Water Act permits aim to remove barriers to data center construction, potentially increasing reliance on energy-intensive sources like coal, as outlined in an April 2025 executive order promoting coal infrastructure for AI facilities, a resource that Democrats want to eliminate. | ||
| The road to AI innovation is now entering a new roller coaster phase. | ||
| Establishing and maintaining dominance in AI data centers is obviously critical for a country to it's Friday, August 1st in the year of our Lord 2025. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| I think it's time to blow this thing. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal this Friday edition. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from the InfoWars studios here in Austin, Texas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Very happy to be with you here today. | |
| And folks, last night, Chuck Grassley declassified some documents about RussiaGate that just tell it all. | ||
| It just tells the whole story. | ||
| We're going to dig into this document. | ||
| We're going to be drawing line maps. | ||
| We're going to be connecting dots. | ||
| We're going to be confirming what we've known the entire time, that the Russiagate collusion hoax was a deliberate coup carried out by a vast network of deep state operatives. | ||
| And we have it all in black and white now. | ||
| It's just absolutely bombshell stuff. | ||
| We got a ton of tariff news and economic news as well. | ||
| A lot of videos to get into, your calls as well. | ||
| We'll begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, here's folks to your daily dispatch. | ||
| For Friday, the 1st of August, 2025, Trump sets 10% to 41% reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries' exports. | ||
| Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday imposing reciprocal tariffs ranging from 10 to 41 percent on U.S. imports from dozens of countries and foreign locations. | ||
| Tariffs, a big topic of conversation on the news sites today, setting tariffs on Canada as well as a bunch of other countries. | ||
| A lot of conflict with the Fed as he, again, goes for Jerome Powell's neck, basically, and trying to get him to actually serve the American people rather than wield his incredible power for the sole purpose and to the sole benefit of the Democratic Party. | ||
| We'll get into that later. | ||
| The second story on similar lines here, U.S. job growth slows sharply in July. | ||
| Unemployment rate rises to 4.2%. | ||
| U.S. job growth slowed more than expected in July, while the prior month's data was revised sharply lower, pointing to a sharp moderation in the labor market. | ||
| Non-farm payrolls increased by 73,000 jobs last month after rising by a downwardly revised 14,000 in June. | ||
| The Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics said in its closely watched employment report on Friday, economists polled by Reuters had forecast payrolls increasing by 110,000 jobs after rising by a previously reported 147,000 in June. | ||
| The unemployment rate rose to 4.2% from 4.1% in June. | ||
| Meanwhile, Trump's special envoy Witkoff and Israeli Ambassador Huckabee will visit Gaza to survey aid distribution sites. | ||
| Prepare the Potimkin village. | ||
| Prepare the Potimkin aid distribution site, Israelis. | ||
| Steve Witkoff serving as Trump's special envoy and U.S. Ambassador Mike Huckabee are scheduled to visit Gaza on Friday to evaluate aid delivery locations amid a severe humanitarian emergency. | ||
| Their visit follows a war that began on October 7th, blah, blah, blah. | ||
| Since the war started, Gaza has faced a complete aid blockade for two and a half months, causing widespread hunger and malnutrition among its 2 million residents and escalating violence at aid distribution points. | ||
| The Gaza Ministry of Health reported that over 90 Palestinians lost their lives and more than 600 were injured within the last 24 hours while trying to receive aid, including 54 fatalities near the Zikum crossing in northern Gaza on Wednesday. | ||
| This visit and increased international pressure came as German Foreign Minister Johan Wadipol stressed Germany's commitment to a two-state solution and the need to begin peace negotiations immediately. | ||
| 90 Palestinians killed and more than 600 injured in just the last 54 hours, including 54, in just the last 24 hours, including 54 fatalities near the Zikum crossing in northern Gaza on Wednesday. | ||
| So just keeping up the routine. | ||
| I mean, it's not a war. | ||
| This isn't a war per se. | ||
| It's just mass executions on a daily basis by the dozens. | ||
| Meanwhile, Naya Bukele's party in El Salvador changes the El Salvadorian constitution in expansion of presidential power. | ||
| The party of El Salvador President Naya Bukele approved constitutional changes in the country's legislative assembly on Thursday that will allow indefinite presidential re-election and extend presidential terms to six years. | ||
| Lawmaker Anna Fuegoa something from the New Ideas party has proposed the changes to five articles of the Constitution. | ||
| The proposal also included eliminating the second round of the election, where two top vote-getters of the first round face off. | ||
| New Ideas, the party and its allies, the Legislative Assembly, in the Legislative Assembly, quickly approved the proposals with the supermajority they hold. | ||
| The vote passed with 57 in favor and three opposed. | ||
| Bukele overwhelmingly won re-election last year despite a constitutional ban after Supreme Court justices selected by his party ruled in 2021 to allow re-election to a second five-year term. | ||
| Observers have worried that Bukele had a plan to consolidate power since at least 2021 when a newly elected Congress with a strong governing party majority voted to remove the magistrates of the Constitutional Chamber of the Supreme Court. | ||
| Those justices had been seen in the last check on the popular president. | ||
| Since then, Bukele has only grown more popular. | ||
| The Biden administration's initial expression of concern gave way to quiet acceptance as Bukele announced his run for re-election. | ||
| With the return of U.S. President Donald Trump to the White House in January, Bukele had a new powerful ally and quickly offered Trump help by taking more than 200 deportees from other countries into newly built prisons for gang members. | ||
| Again, this just we are entering into a new age of kings. | ||
| I don't know who it was yesterday. | ||
| I saw today. | ||
| This may have been Andrew Torba. | ||
| Somebody on X made this point, and I think they're right. | ||
| The world is, you know, as a whole, collapsing into basically just bureaucratic morass. | ||
| And you're going to have strong characters, strong personalities, usually men, rise up from this rubble and seize the reins. | ||
| As Napoleon put it, you know, the crown of France was in the gutter and I picked it up with my sword. | ||
| You're going to see a lot of crowns being picked up with a lot of swords, I think, in the near future. | ||
| And as whoever this was online, again, I, you know, this is what happens to me is I read like a million ideas online and then I try to repackage them, the ones that I think are valuable for the audience. | ||
| But then I feel guilty because they're not always my ideas, although I do agree with them. | ||
| And we'll expand on them. | ||
| So sorry, I just have this guilt complex where I'm always, I have like a, it's like a compulsion for me. | ||
| I have to tell you that I didn't come up with this idea. | ||
| Anyway, whoever it was made a great point. | ||
| They said, we're going to see a new age of kings. | ||
| There's not going to be called kings, but they will be for all intents and purposes. | ||
| Niabue Kele is basically the king of El Salvador and honestly should probably be crowned king of El Salvador. | ||
| And this is the process that it always takes, right? | ||
| You know, the one thing when you read Roman history and you learn about the Republic and how it turns into an empire after Caesar conquers the Gauls and reorganizes The entire governmental system. | ||
| And then those changes are confirmed by Augustus, who he adopts as his son. | ||
| And then adoption becomes the rule of how you pass power along rather than electing consuls. | ||
| It becomes a family affair, which, of course, is the prerequisite for a dynasty. | ||
| It's how you get kings. | ||
| Basically, just like in the Roman Republic, you have representative government collapsing into bureaucracy, a strongman rising and establishing a dynasty. | ||
| I mean, we're going to start seeing that. | ||
| It is, in fact, not the end of history, and we're actually on a very exciting trajectory towards some pretty unprecedented governmental manifestations, I believe, around the world. | ||
| So good for Bukele. | ||
| I think he deserves it. | ||
| I think he deserves it. | ||
| And of course, he infuriates the powers that be more than anything because he has shown with incontrovertible proof that you can solve the problems that they constantly create. | ||
| You can actually have a safe, prosperous country that's not ruled by a collage of violent psychopath criminal gangs. | ||
| And they hate him for that. | ||
| They hate him for that because they are really desperate to make you think that this system is irreparably broken and needs to be replaced with some sort of AI-controlled technocracy. | ||
| They're really desperate to make you think that, gee, all of these problems, all the crime and the house prices and the immigration, these are just natural occurrences that are impossible to deal with unless we have surrendered all of our sovereignty and all of our authority to some unelected technocratic Israeli to deal with. | ||
| So that's not true. | ||
| In fact, you can just throw the criminals in prison. | ||
| You can just round up the networks. | ||
| You can just put things right, achieve justice, and maintain sovereignty if you wanted to do that. | ||
| The people in power are running the Cloward Pivin strategy of let's destroy the country by moving away from all the traditions, but then also blame all the traditions for the current state of the country we've destroyed so we can eradicate the traditional governmental establishment in favor of our own communistic, socialistic, unelected, globalist, technocratic control grid. | ||
| Or we can just elect somebody like Bukele and throw the criminals in prison. | ||
| I guess the choice is ours. | ||
| And then we have this, the final story of our Daily Dispatch in the top story, maybe ever in history. | ||
| Senate releases docs proving Hillary knew Trump was innocent of Russia collusion and worked with the FBI to frame him. | ||
| And that's just doesn't even do justice to scratching the surface of what these documents reveal. | ||
| Again, Chuck Grassley released these documents, and we have them here. | ||
| We have the 30-page slab of paper here to get into. | ||
| And it, we're just going to have to read through the whole thing. | ||
| We're honestly just going to have to read through the whole thing. | ||
| Authorized for public release by Chairman Grassley. | ||
| Report on matters related to intelligence activities and investigations arising out of the 2016 presidential campaign. | ||
| Long story short, it was a giant conspiracy, including Loretta Lynch, Obama, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, everybody in the top brass of the FBI and the CIA, all being coordinated and instructed and guided by the Open Side Society's Foundation, | ||
| George Soros and his operatives, quarterbacking it all, manipulating it all, and all of this being done, again, in a way that just confirms absolutely everything we've ever said about this whole situation on InfoWars. | ||
| So we're going to dig very, very much into this revelation from Chuck Grassley. | ||
| And I'm telling you, I read through it yesterday and it's just absolutely mind-blowing stuff. | ||
| Stay tuned for that. | ||
| I do want to remind you, while we still have time, you've got to go to thealxjonesstore.com, thealxjonestore.com, one of the biggest sales we've ever had there happening right now, the store-wide buy one, get one free super sale for VIPs only, folks. | ||
| You got to sign up for the VIP club. | ||
| And hell, if you're just signing up for the VIP Club to take advantage of this sale, I'm not going to tell anybody. | ||
| I won't tell anybody. | ||
| All right. | ||
| You can get away with it. | ||
| We're going to turn a blind eye. | ||
| All you do, you go sign up for the VIP Club. | ||
| It's $30 a month. | ||
| You get $40 immediately. | ||
| You spend that money on $80 worth of product with the buy one, get one free VIP sale. | ||
| And then if you want, you can cancel the VIP membership. | ||
| No one will be any the wiser. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| So wait, you're saying that for $30, I get $80 worth of stuff? | ||
| Believe it or not, Matt, that's exactly what I'm saying. | ||
| Literally, $30 VIP club, $40 of store credit. | ||
| You've just made $10. | ||
| You buy something that's buy one, get one, you're doubling your money. | ||
| That's $80 worth of product for $30 to join the VIP club. | ||
| And then you can just cancel. | ||
| And I won't tell them. | ||
| I'm not going to say anything. | ||
| Your secret's safe with me. | ||
| It's all right. | ||
| I don't mind. | ||
| Buy one, get one free on all supplements and apparel while supplies last. | ||
| You can unlock massive savings with our storewide buy one, get one super sale at thelexjonesstore.com, where VIP members score buy one, get one deals on all supplements and apparel to supercharge your wellness and style. | ||
| This exclusive offer is reserved for our VIP club elites, giving you unbeatable value, top quality products that will fuel your fight for truth and freedom. | ||
| Join today for $30, get $40, instant in-store credit, plus access to the epic Super Sale. | ||
| Buy one, get one free. | ||
| And you can cancel anytime. | ||
| But when you do sign up for the VIP Club, you get a ton of other stuff as well. | ||
| Not just access to this sale, but a bunch of other great discounts. | ||
| Sometimes VIPs get free shipping when it's not available to anybody else. | ||
| You also get to download all of the old archive Alex Jones tapes. | ||
| You can have every Alex Jones radio show. | ||
| It's an archive exclusively available at thealxjonesstore.com for the VIP members. | ||
| Go today, thealxjonesstore.com slash Harrison if you want to let him know Who sent you? | ||
| Now, I don't even know how to adequately or appropriately set up this document that's been dropped in our laps here. | ||
| Chuck Grasslu released it. | ||
| Report on matters related to intelligence activities and investigations arising out of the 2016 presidential campaign. | ||
| And like I said, I mean, it literally just confirms absolutely everything that we have to say about it. | ||
| There's a story about this on InfoWars breaking declassified Durham appendix shows Hillary Clinton personally ordered Trump-Russia hoax, used FBI to, quote, put oil on the fire. | ||
| Documents reveal deep conspiracy between politicians, non-governmental organizations, and intelligence communities to usurp free and fair elections. | ||
| And we just get into this. | ||
| This classified appendix, so this was an appendix, an addition to the Durham report that I guess was hidden. | ||
| Supposedly, this was part of the document tranche that was discovered in burn bags thanks to an FBI whistleblower telling Cash Patel, hey, there's all this evidence that they're about to burn. | ||
| Cashel went into some locked secret room in the FBI headquarters, found all these burn bags. | ||
| And I suppose this is a portion of that. | ||
| This classified appendix forms a part of the report on matters related to intelligence activities and investigations arising out of the 2016 presidential campaigns and provides further information about matters covered in three sections of the report. | ||
| These three sections, the section provides further factual backgrounds about the quote one or the one, possible Clinton campaign plan described in the office's report. | ||
| Two, the office's efforts to verify or refute information about that plan. | ||
| And three, the manner in which the department officials received and acted on or did not act on the campaign plan information. | ||
| The office's prosecution decisions related to the plan are described in the other section of the unclassified report. | ||
| Beginning in or about 2014 and continuing at least in or about 2016, individuals affiliated with Russian intelligence services hacked and gained unlawful access to emails of numerous U.S. public and private entities, including government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and think tanks based in the United States. | ||
| Among the nonprofit organizations hacked by the Russian government actors in 2016 was the Open Societies Foundation, formerly known as the Soros Foundation. | ||
| From blank through blank, received from a blank source, referred to herein as T1, shared with the FBI, intelligence consisting of blank. | ||
| We identify the information provided by T1 as sensitive intelligence. | ||
| The sensitive intelligence included emails, blank, hacking of U.S.-based communications, blank, reports analyzing the hacked U.S. material, and three, what appears or purport to be original hacked emails of U.S. persons or persons of such email. | ||
| Two of the apparently hacked emails appear to have originated from the Open Society Foundations. | ||
| The purported author of these emails was Leonard Bernardo, who is the regional director for Eurasia at the Open Societies Foundation. | ||
| In that capacity, Bernardo oversaw efforts related to Russia and the former Soviet republics, among other countries. | ||
| So again, if you can cast your mind back to 2016, I think you remember there was this scandal about the DNC hacked emails that were supposedly hacked by Russia. | ||
| And I very distinctly remember the exact moment Trump made a joke about this. | ||
| And it seemed to me at the time that this was perfectly aligned with and seemed to be sort of the impetus for the whole Russia collusion hoax. | ||
| I don't know if y'all remember this, but Trump went out and gave a speech where he said, if the Russians have the emails, release them. | ||
| Release the emails. | ||
| Let us know what we have. | ||
| And it was like from that moment on. | ||
| And it was, you know, it was half a joke from Trump. | ||
| It wasn't him very seriously sending a personal message to Russia saying, Russia, will you please leak these emails? | ||
| I think half of it was him mocking them because Wikileaks also had the emails. | ||
| So he's making fun of them going, I think Wikileaks has them, but if Russia has them, hell, they should leak them. | ||
| They should release them. | ||
| And of course, making the point that our government is engaged in corrupt activity, if there's criminality going on in our government and we have to beg the Russians to expose that because our government is so corrupt that the bad actors in our government would never be caught without outside interference, there's a lot of points to that, but nobody watching actually seriously thought that was a legitimate call to Russia to betray the United States and interfere in the election. | ||
| But it was from like that moment on, I remember everybody saying, Donald Trump calls for Russia to interfere in the election. | ||
| He is a Russian puppet. | ||
| How dare he? | ||
| But it's true. | ||
| The Russians had all these emails and they showed collaboration, coordination, conspiracy to not just frame Donald Trump as a Russian agent in order to try to prevent him from becoming president, but also admitting in this documentation, and we'll get to it, that it was all in service of the eventual war with Russia that Clinton and her cronies were establishing the groundwork for as early as 2014. | ||
| Of course, the groundwork for that had been laid even earlier with the Ukraine coup and everything, but they actually admit here, and I'll read it to you, and it's really just me patting myself on the back for always bringing up the fact that there's a reason it's Russia that they went with when trying to lie about Trump. | ||
| They could have said he was a Chinese collusion, Saudi Arabian collusion. | ||
| There are any 200 countries they can choose from. | ||
| They chose Russia in particular in order to drive Trump away from friendly activity with Putin, knowing that they would eventually go to war with Putin and didn't want some rogue U.S. president making peace with him in the meantime. | ||
| Beginning in 2016, the FBI received information from T1 related to the 2016 presidential election, including reports written by blank. | ||
| These reports purported communications of Bernardo and others. | ||
| In particular, in 2016, T1 provided the U.S. government with two blank memoranda that described confidential conversations, blank, between then-Democrat, and when I say blank, by the way, for our radio listeners. | ||
| That's when it's been censored. | ||
| It's been blocked out. | ||
| Blacked out. | ||
| Redacted is the word I was looking for. | ||
| Thank you, Matt. | ||
| Between then Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Washerman Schultz and two individuals of the Open Society Foundation, referred to in the memorando as the Soros Foundation, i.e., one, Bernardo and two, Jeffrey Goldstein, who, according to public resources, public sources, was senior policy advisor for Eurasia at the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| The January 2016 memorandum, which was in Russian, blank, stated the relevant part. | ||
| In January 12th of this year, during a confidential discussion with Jeffrey Goldstein, a representative of the Soros Foundation on Eurasia, Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Washerman Schultz characterized the situation in her party in light of the growing scandal surrounding Hillary Clinton as follows. | ||
| Information released to the media in the last few days about the FBI investigating possible corruption related to Department of State under the leadership of Clinton preferential treatment of donors of the Clinton Foundation caused a significant reaction inside the party. | ||
| At the same time, the leadership of the DP, that's Democratic Party, had known about the information since June of 2015. | ||
| According to Washerman Schultz, FBI so far does not have persuasive evidence against Hillary Clinton because of the timely deletion of relevant data from mail servers. | ||
| Oh, but her emails. | ||
| But her emails, though. | ||
| This paragraph alone or this segment alone. | ||
| And as far as I can tell, this is a memorandum from involving Bernardo Jeffrey Goldstein at the Soros Foundation, aka the Open Societies Foundation, | ||
| and Washerman Schultz communicating with each other, admitting that Hillary Clinton was involved in corruption at the State Department and that she got away with it by acid watching her server and then laughing about it in your face. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, yesterday was on. | ||
| It was like Christmas for conspiracy theorists, I have to tell you. | ||
| The release from Chuck Grassley of these documents, the appendix of the Durham report that's been hidden, stored away, kept in the dark for almost a decade at this point, lays out in no uncertain terms with perfect clarity the conspiracy. | ||
| Or I guess I can say a conspiracy. | ||
| An absolute verbatim conspiracy. | ||
| It is truly crazy. | ||
| Stories in InfoWars, declassified Durham appendix shows Hillary Clinton personally ordered Trump-Russia hoax, used FBI to, quote, put more oil on the fire. | ||
| Folks, every page of this document reveals more criminal activity, blatant corruption, total collusion to screw over the American people and achieve their truly murderous ends. | ||
| So what we just read was that in a memorandum between the Open Society Foundation and the DNC Democratic Party, Debbie Washerman Schultz, revealed that, yes, they were searching for evidence of Hillary Clinton's criminal activity, in part because of preferential treatment of donors at the Clinton Foundation by the State Department, right? | ||
| So some organization or individual or country for that matter, remember, one of the biggest donors to the Clinton Foundation was Saudi Arabia. | ||
| They would donate to the Clinton Foundation and then they would receive preferential treatment or extra attention. | ||
| It was a bribe in order to co-opt the power of the State Department for their benefit. | ||
| So the Clintons, Bill and Hillary, running this fake sham charity as a money laundering operation, accepted so-called donations from foreign powers. | ||
| And then in exchange for that so-called donation, they would receive preferential benefit from the State Department. | ||
| It's the pay-for-play model that Joe Biden used with his son Hunter and his brother Jim in weaponizing and selling the powers of the vice presidency under Obama. | ||
| The same thing was happening in the State Department with Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Essentially, under Obama, the entire American government was just openly for sale. | ||
| And all you had to do was donate to the Clinton Foundation or invest in Hunter's company in order to get access directly to the levers of power in America so that these corrupt people, trying to keep the four-letter words out of my mouth, these corrupt people could sell out your country for their own personal benefit. | ||
| Okay, so they say, yeah, it looks like, you know, FBI was investigating possible corruption relating to Department of State under Clinton, giving preferential treatment to donators to her foundation. | ||
| And that causes significant reaction inside the party, which is surprising. | ||
| I guess the reaction would be, oh my gosh, we have to cover this up quick. | ||
| It's just hard for me to believe the Democrats actually have any genuine, principled outrage at the concept of the Clintons selling out America. | ||
| It seems like they're actually fine with that. | ||
| But apparently it caused negative reaction inside the party. | ||
| But they say, and they admit, in their own words, FBI so far does not have persuasive evidence against Hillary Clinton because of the timely deletion of relevant data from mail servers. | ||
| So in other words, I mean, they just admit here that there was data on the servers that would have given the FBI all the evidence they would need to prove that Hillary Clinton was running a pay-for-play scheme. | ||
| And this is Debbie Washerman Schultz admitting that the only reason the FBI doesn't have the information was because of, quote, timely deletion of relevant data from mail servers. | ||
| Oh, but her emails. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah, but her emails, though. | ||
| Okay, blatant corruption. | ||
| So that's admitted. | ||
| I mean, again, we're on page, literally on page three, and already we have the Democrats admitting that they deleted relevant data from the illegal mail servers in order to cover up the criminal pay-for-play corruption activity Hillary Clinton was engaged in with the State Department. | ||
| We're not even done with the third page. | ||
| Obama has no intention to darken the final part of his presidency and legacy by the scandal surrounding the main contender of the Democratic Party. | ||
| He has no intention to darken the final part of his presidency. | ||
| Well, that sort of backfired, didn't it? | ||
| Your legacy could have been that you were a great president and Hillary Clinton was a corrupt scumbag. | ||
| Instead, now your legacy, as we all know, you're the corrupt scumbag. | ||
| You're actually the criminal. | ||
| You actually let people get away with things out of your own ego to upkeep your own self-importance. | ||
| Thinking that this crime against America can't be punished because that might leave a black mark on your complete fake, falsified, and frankly, scandal-ridden legacy. | ||
| They admit that. | ||
| Obama has no intention to darken the final part of the presidency and legacy by the scandal surrounding the main contender from the DP. | ||
| To solve the problem, the president puts pressure on FBI Director James Comey through Attorney General Lynch, however, so far without concrete results. | ||
| All right, so again, what we have here is we have it admitted by the Democrats, by the Democratic Party in an own internal memo from 2016 saying Clinton was involved in pay-for-play activity, totally corrupt. | ||
| The FBI was investigating it, but they weren't going to find anything because the illegal email servers had already been whitewashed, already been deleted and acid-washed and bleach bit. | ||
| And that Obama, in order to preserve his own legacy, sent Attorney General Littoreto Lynch to pressure James Comey to drop the investigation against Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Conspiracy. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| They conspired. | ||
| They worked in secret to cover up criminal activity so that their agenda could progress and their political cachet could be wielded. | ||
| Comey gravitates towards Republicans and apparently intends to prolong the investigation so that the scandal would keep going until the presidential election to jeopardize the chances of the Democratic Party to win the presidential race. | ||
| So that's the Democratic Party and the Open Society Foundation saying that they suspect Comey of trying to use this investigation to hurt Hillary Clinton. | ||
| During confidential contacts on March 5th with Leonard Bernardo, again, Soros Fund Eurasian Regional Director. | ||
| Oh, no, that's a different. | ||
| Okay, sick. | ||
| So they wrote this wrong in this memo, but this is a March 2016 memo. | ||
| And they say Leonard Bernardo, who was actually the, or maybe he was the fund Eurasian Regional Director, but he was high up in the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| Debbie Washman Schultz, chairperson of the National Committee of the Democratic Party, characterized the developments in the pre-election campaign of Hillary Clinton in the following way. | ||
| Quote, in relation to the consensus reached among the Democratic Party leadership regarding the candidacy of Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama sanctioned the use of all administrative levers to remove possible negative effects from the FBI investigation of cases related to the Clinton Foundation in the email correspondence in the State Department. | ||
| Barack Obama, as president, sanctioned the use of all administrative levers to remove possible effects from the FBI investigation of cases. | ||
| Okay, translation here. | ||
| Hillary Clinton broke the law, covered it up by deleting her email server. | ||
| Barack Obama not only sent Loretta Lynch to pressure in a secretive and probably illegal way, pressure the FBI director to drop the case on Hillary Clinton, but actually to activate all possible levers all throughout the executive branch to try to scuttle, | ||
| destroy, delay, somehow prevent the investigation of the FBI into Hillary Clinton, ostensibly to save Obama's legacy, which now, I hope, we all know, is in complete tatters as all of his criminal activity and the cover-up is revealed here in black and white for all of us to read in an official document hidden for years, released finally by Chuck Grassley as the chairman of the Oversight Committee. | ||
| Based on information from Washington Schultz, the FBI does not possess any kind of direct evidence against Clinton because of their timely deletion of the email servers. | ||
| The political director of the Clinton, of Hillary Clinton staff, Amanda Rinteria, regularly receives information from Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the plans and intentions of the FBI. | ||
| Okay, so another wrinkle of this corruption. | ||
| You now not only have the President of the United States pressuring the FBI and using all sorts of other administrative pressures he can wield to drop a legitimate investigation into actual criminal activity of the State Department under his watch, but you also have the Chief of Staff of Hillary Clinton receiving direct reports from the Attorney General Loretta Lynch as to the progression of the FBI investigation, | ||
| obviously in order to stay ahead of it and to delete information they be getting close to, or I don't know, have suspects they may be questioning commit suicide by shooting themselves twice in the back of the head. | ||
| I'm just speculating, but obviously there's a reason that they're being kept abreast of the latest developments in the FBI case. | ||
| And it's not because they're curious, right? | ||
| It's not because they're just so interested in how the FBI is doing these days. | ||
| It's because they committed crimes and now they have somebody on the inside feeding them information about the investigation so they can stay ahead of it. | ||
| Total criminal activity. | ||
| This person is not even in the government. | ||
| She is a assistant to Hillary Clinton, who at the time was running for president. | ||
| So you now have people within the government working with law enforcement to destroy the investigation in order to help the presumed candidate of the Democratic Party. | ||
| Total, open, blatant, treasonous corruption. | ||
| Every single person mentioned in this has to be arrested. | ||
| I think Alex Jones said 60 days. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| That's a little long for me. | ||
| 60 minutes is more like the timeline I would like to work with. | ||
| But should we say 60 days, two months? | ||
| You got August and September. | ||
| If by October these people aren't arrested, maybe we have to arrest them ourselves. | ||
| I mean, maybe that's the ultimate lesson of Thomas Jefferson and the founding fathers, which is like justice isn't dependent on what the government will give you, just like our rights are not dependent on what the government will give us. | ||
| If you've got criminal activity happening and the government isn't stopping it, it's not just legal for you to involve in this. | ||
| All right, now that's driving me crazy. | ||
| I like it. | ||
| I like the sentiment. | ||
| But oh my God. | ||
| There's a joke from the Drew Carey show that I've remembered my whole life from the early 90s. | ||
| And the character's like, do you guys hear a clock ticking in your head that just gets louder and louder all the time? | ||
| No, you don't. | ||
| Anyway, that scared the crap out of me as a kid. | ||
| The idea of a clock ticking in your head, always getting louder. | ||
| The crew just somehow invoked long-dormant PTSD in my brain with that ticking sound. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's the sound you hear on Sunday nights before you have to go to bed to go to school on Monday. | |
| Or do a show on Monday morning. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| No joke. | ||
| Yeah, I've got what they call Captain Hook syndrome. | ||
| I can't hear that clock ticking without my heart rate going up. | ||
| All right. | ||
| What was I saying? | ||
| Just total, just total blatant. | ||
| Like, if the government doesn't give you justice, that doesn't mean that justice has therefore been achieved, right? | ||
| If you got to go out and get it yourself, actually. | ||
| Actually, the government doesn't give you justice. | ||
| That doesn't mean that you have to be okay with that. | ||
| It doesn't mean you have to accept that. | ||
| If a criminal is able to manipulate the legal system in order to get away with the crime, that doesn't mean he is therefore metaphysically innocent. | ||
| Right? | ||
| The structures of our government, just like they don't grant us rights, they simply codify and enumerate them. | ||
| They don't grant us justice either. | ||
| They're just the most convenient form to achieve justice that we've all agreed to adhere to as long as it works. | ||
| And that's sort of the key part, as long as it works. | ||
| If these systems of law and order that we've established to bring us justice fail to bring us justice, instead we are continually presented with innumerable amounts, you know, innumerable instances of evidence of blatant criminality at the highest levels of our government, | ||
| and our justice, so-called justice system, is incapable of holding these people accountable or punishing them or in any way bringing them under the same purview and authority that you or I would be under, then it's not a system of justice. | ||
| It's just purely a system of power to impose upon your enemy. | ||
| And so we're under no obligation to adhere to it. | ||
| They've broken the societal contract. | ||
| And look, I've said it a million times. | ||
| That is genuinely the last thing that I want. | ||
| All we want, Trump supporters, info warriors, conservatives, patriotic Americans, is for the American system to function as designed, to be used with the intent that it was designed to be used for, | ||
| and for us to rescue this system and reinvigorate this system and rebuild this system and reinforce this system so that we can achieve justice and hold these criminals to account and not have our justice system taken over by a bunch of criminals to further progress their criminality and punish anybody that tries to stand up against them. | ||
| And if it gets to the point where we got to get vigilante justice, where our justice system is incapable or unwilling to actually punish the real criminals while ruthlessly pursuing you for any perceived slight against the powers that be, it would get really bad. | ||
| It would be really bad. | ||
| And especially at this very dangerous time where we have a bunch of enemies geopolitically just waiting for us to have our guard down so they can take us on. | ||
| We don't want to have mobs of Americans, you know, kicking down the gates to private neighborhoods and hauling Loretta Lynch out of her bed for some street justice. | ||
| God forbid we have to descend to that. | ||
| And do we not get that that's the whole reason that we have a justice system? | ||
| It's because the alternative is mob rule is just like lynching people and just like riots. | ||
| And right, we have the system. | ||
| And so people don't act on their impulses. | ||
| They don't just try to achieve justice themselves. | ||
| They don't get revenge themselves. | ||
| They don't take on vendettas and go try to dish out their own version of punishment under their own judgment. | ||
| We all agree we're not going to do that. | ||
| We'll leave it up to the system because we trust it and because it works as intended. | ||
| If it doesn't work as intended, there's no reason to trust it. | ||
| This societal social construct is contract is broken. | ||
| And so there's no reason to adhere to it. | ||
| So like this really isn't an option. | ||
| Punishment has to happen. | ||
| Frankly, I think it's going to happen. | ||
| The only question is, how is it going to happen? | ||
| I would love to see it happen through the appropriate channels leveling the prescribed punishment against these vicious, corrupt idiots whose crimes have been exposed in black and white for the world to see. | ||
| I'm desperate for our American system to prove its own worth, to prove its own value, to insist upon its own legitimacy by throwing These people in prison for a long time by seizing everything they've ever owned and giving it back to the American people. | ||
| Of investigating not just the people enumerated in this document, but the organizations that they work for being investigated as the mafias that they are. | ||
| In this document, you've got the Open Society Foundation, the Democratic Party, and a number of other organizations harboring criminals working as the organizations by which criminals commit their crimes. | ||
| How do we even have this document and there haven't been SWAT teams kicking down the door of the Democratic headquarters and hauling away all of their computers? | ||
| How is this not treated as a perfectly valid and legal warrant for arresting, interrogating, and surveilling every single member of the Open Society Foundation leadership? | ||
| I mean, they were doing this in their capacity as, you know, Eurasian regional director of the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| So it's not like this is a situation where, you know, some dude who works at Microsoft runs a scam, but you're not going to punish Microsoft from that. | ||
| He's an individual. | ||
| He committed a crime. | ||
| He'll be punished. | ||
| The company has nothing to do with it. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| This was done in the official capacity using the official and, you know, corporate attributes, corporate capabilities of the Open Society Foundation to achieve this political manipulation, corruption, pay-for-play activity. | ||
| The political director of the Hillary Clinton staff, Amanda Rinteria, regularly receives information from Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the plans and intentions of the FBI. | ||
| And of course, y'all remember that there was a giant scandal that they completely tried to ignore where Loretta Lynch was caught in person in 2016. | ||
| FBI never probed confidential talks between DNC, Clinton campaign, and George Soros group, Bombshell Intel Files Show. | ||
| They've known it. | ||
| This is from the Durham Report. | ||
| This has been hidden for the last five, six years at least. | ||
| Active work is being done questioning potential witnesses who are mostly computer specialists in the Clinton private circle. | ||
| They represent the only tools that may be used in this matter. | ||
| Therefore, the threat is minimal. | ||
| DNC predicts a certain Clinton victory in the current presidential campaign. | ||
| The impressive results of Donald Trump are dividing the Republican Party elite, which finds itself in near-panic condition. | ||
| So again, this memo is from 2016, which I love that we have these internal memos from 2016 to show you what they were actually thinking at the time, just how wrong they were. | ||
| The two-pronged DP opposition is focused on discrediting Trump through debates and propaganda activity based upon his weak points, such as his uncontrollable temperament, questionable instances in business dealing, absence of diplomatic skills, lack of political experience. | ||
| Among other things, the Clinton staff, with support from special services, is preparing scandalous revelations of business relations between Trump and the Russian mafia, quote unquote. | ||
| Then they list a bunch of people who they are basically saying we're going to try to pretend to tie him to these people because all these people have associations with the Russian government. | ||
| So again, just like when we talk about these media campaigns, the psychological operations, this is what we're talking about. | ||
| I mean, it's not, we're not kidding when we say this. | ||
| We're not exaggerating or like using dramatic words for effect. | ||
| Literally, the Open Society Foundation, the federal government, the DNC, the Clinton campaign, all of their collaborators in the mainstream media literally send memos to one another going, here's the plan. | ||
| We're going to try to discredit Trump by associating him with Russian oligarchs and mafia members. | ||
| Here's the list of the people to associate him with. | ||
| Here are the things to go after, his inexperience with this, his temperament, his this. | ||
| And they get these and they follow the instructions. | ||
| And so, you know, to the average person out there who doesn't have the ability to, you know, imagine things, I guess, sees all of this happen all at once. | ||
| And to them, the ubiquity of the statements, the, how should I put it, the unified and coordinated revelation of information to them is evidence of its truth, which is the opposite of what it is. | ||
| See, these talking points go out to all the media outlets, so they all push the same story at the same time. | ||
| Now, to us, who know what's going on in the background, we understand, okay, a memo's gone out. | ||
| They've gotten their talking points, they're all following the same script. | ||
| To the average normie out there who doesn't see that, all they see is TNBC is reporting this, but so is CNN, and Fox News is saying the same thing. | ||
| If everybody's saying the same thing, it must be true. | ||
| How could they all come to the same conclusion if it's not true? | ||
| It must be true. | ||
| And that's part of the strategy, right? | ||
| When you have a full spectrum push where everybody's reporting it, everybody in a slightly different way, everybody reports it as if they themselves discovered it or as if it's, you know, something that everybody's realizing at the same time. | ||
| No, the reality is they're getting memos that are directing them specifically what to say, when to say it, how to say it, who to relate it to, and what the purpose of it is. | ||
| So again, when normies see this, to them, they, they, you know, it's almost like the, it's almost like the quote of like, meat comes from the store, right? | ||
| It's like, well, the meat's on the shelf. | ||
| There it is. | ||
| They never stop to think, like, well, where did it come from? | ||
| How did it get here? | ||
| Where was it before this? | ||
| How did they, right? | ||
| You shouldn't hunt. | ||
| You should get meat from the store where it comes from, right? | ||
| To these people, it's like, well, once the story's on the headline, it's just, it's just there. | ||
| It just appears there. | ||
| It's just there. | ||
| God only knows where it came from or, you know, what was happening before then. | ||
| It's just, it's just presented to them and they just accept it and don't think about what motivation anybody had for posting it. | ||
| So they just see Trump Russia, Trump, Russia. | ||
| NBC is telling me, CNN's telling me, Fox is telling me. | ||
| They just hear it pumped into their head over and over: Trump, Russia, Trump, Russia, Trump, Russia, Trump, Russia. | ||
| And eventually, they believe that that's the purpose of the coordinated attack. | ||
| That's the purpose of the collaboration, the conspiracy behind the scenes. | ||
| We're just barely strat conspiracy, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay with us. | |
| All right, folks, welcome back. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| We have a lot of other stories that we could be getting to here. | ||
| I got a lot of other videos to go to. | ||
| Obviously, you know, everything that we covered in the Daily Dispatch. | ||
| You've got an Oklahoma City approving controversial facial recognition deals. | ||
| The O'Keeffe media group's come out with new undercover footage showing the director of a nonprofit group admitting that they tip off illegal aliens when ICE is nearby. | ||
| So another person whose name should be on the arrest list. | ||
| Manhunt in Colorado after Agent opens fire on criminal illegals attempting to ram ICE vehicle. | ||
| So now you've got illegal immigrants using vehicles as a weapon, trying to ram ICE agents. | ||
| We got the ongoing starvation situation in Gaza. | ||
| Joe Biden is under the impression that marginalized groups are dramatically under attack in this country. | ||
| Which I think we're all shocked to hear that Joe Biden is in fact still alive. | ||
| Trump envoys Gaza aid efforts per second. | ||
| Like we got a lot that we could be talking about. | ||
| We got a lot of stuff going on in the world. | ||
| But I don't think anybody will blame me if I just keep reading through this document. | ||
| And I'm just going to have to speed it up a little bit because I've been commenting on a lot of it and trying to put it all in perspective. | ||
| I'm just going to have to trust the InfoWars audience to understand some of the conclusions embedded in this article for themselves because I'm going to try to get through as much of it as possible. | ||
| And I can't constantly be harping on and on about what it implies. | ||
| And I'm going to have to trust you to do that. | ||
| I do want to go to a video though, clip number one. | ||
| This is a video, I believe this is a report from 2020, if I'm not mistaken. | ||
| It was posted by Mays Moore on X. But this is one. | ||
| This is from Fox News. | ||
| DOJ investigating James Comey over alleged leak of Russian intelligence document. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The document reportedly came to the attention of U.S. intelligence officials from Dutch intelligence. | |
| It included discussion of an email exchange between former DNC chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Leonard Bernardo, an official with Open Society Foundations run by George Soros. | ||
| According to the Times, Wasserman Schultz allegedly told Bernardo that then Attorney General Loretta Lynch would not charge Clinton with a crime for having the primate email server. | ||
| Wasserman Schultz and Bernardo have both denied even being in contact with each other, suggesting the document was a fake attempt by the Russians to throw a wrench into the U.S. intelligence community. | ||
| A spokeswoman for Bernardo sent me a statement today. | ||
| I want to read part of it. | ||
| Quote, Bernardo has never spoken with or corresponded with Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz in any fashion. | ||
| The email mentioned is fictitious disinformation. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Folks, $40 or not. | ||
| It was discovered in 2020 that Debbie Wasserman Schultz was communicating with this character from the Open Societies Foundation. | ||
| It was discovered and exposed. | ||
| And in 2020, they denied ever talking to each other, ever corresponding with each other whatsoever, and said, in fact, the claims that they did talk were Russian disinformation. | ||
| Is it becoming clear to you how just blatantly criminal all of this is? | ||
| This isn't the type of stuff that you do when you're on the up and up, when you're following the law. | ||
| Lying to cover up the lies, to cover up the lies, to cover up the lies. | ||
| Communications to talk about how they're manipulating things. | ||
| Those communications being exposed, and they lie about the exposure, saying, actually, that's Russian disinformation. | ||
| When really they were exposed for being the ones to create the whole fake trend of Russian disinformation to cover up the disinformation they were spreading specifically to hamper our relationship with Russia. | ||
| Hope we're all keeping up. | ||
| It's a tangled web. | ||
| Oh, what a tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive. | ||
| And that's what we're seeing here. | ||
| So we'll continue to untangle this very tangled web on the other side. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls. | ||
| Maybe this hour, maybe the next hour. | ||
| I'm going to see how much of this I can get through because there is so very much more to come. | ||
| So much more information to be discovered. | ||
| We're on page five of 30, folks. | ||
| Five of 30. | ||
| And already I found at least like 10 crimes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Putting the power of conversation into the caller's hands. | |
| You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Music All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| Again, we're just reading through this document release from the Senate. | ||
| Senator Grassley published this document that's been hidden for nine years at least. | ||
| Yeah, I'm not even skipping anything. | ||
| Every paragraph in this has evidence of the crimes that the Democrats committed in collaboration with the FBI. | ||
| With regard to the discussion in the last paragraph of this memorandum of scandalous revelations that the, quote, Clinton staff was preparing with report from quote special services. | ||
| The words that FBI linguists translated as special services are Russian words that one analyst believed at the time referred to the FBI and CIA, or more broadly, the intelligence and law enforcement communities. | ||
| So, in other words, when they said special services, the FBI was like, okay, that's sort of code for intelligence agents of some sort. | ||
| Another analyst, caveating it was speculation, said that perhaps the phrase special services in this context could refer to Trump dossier author Christopher Steele, who, according to media reports and Steele's own testimony in UK legal proceedings, formerly worked as an intelligence professional for the British government. | ||
| In addition, the office has determined that at the time of this memorandum, Glenn Simpson's firm Fusion GPS was, in fact, preparing open source opposition research regarding Trump's purported ties to Russian oligarchs. | ||
| Blank, blank, blank, blank, blank, redacted, redacted, redacted. | ||
| On March 31st, 2016, FBI personnel, including Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Deputy General Counsel Anderson, Assistant Director for the Cyber Division James Traynor, and the Director's Chief of Staff James Rubicki, shared the intelligence information with Associate Deputy Attorney General David Margolis, the highest-ranking career official in the department, and other senior career officials at the department. | ||
| The FBI briefed Margolis on the specifics of the sensitive intelligence and informed him that the FBI assessed the information to likely not be credible. | ||
| FBI's assistance assessment, according to McCabe and later memorialized by Anderson in an August 12, 2016 memorandum discussed below, was based on four factors. | ||
| First, the report reflected multiple levels of hearsay. | ||
| Second, somebody involved in the communication or in passing along the communication to somebody at a think tank may have engaged in exaggeration. | ||
| Third, the blank who drafted the reports may have engaged in editorialization or exaggeration. | ||
| Fourth, the reports may be unreliable because of translation errors. | ||
| Okay, so four reasons why the Steele Christopher dossier was illegitimate on the face of it. | ||
| After that meeting, the FBI sought any additional related information from T1. | ||
| T1 had no responsive information. | ||
| At this time, the FBI considered taking a number of covert investigative steps to determine, among other things, whether the Attorney General had in fact communicated with Amanda Rintera, the political director of the Hillary Clinton staff referenced in the blank memorandum. | ||
| The FBI ultimately decided not to take those steps. | ||
| The FBI ultimately decided not to take these steps. | ||
| So earlier, it was admitted that Hillary Clinton's chief of staff, her political director, was receiving, quote, regular updates from Attorney General Loretta Lynch, informing her as to the progress of the FBI investigation so they could step ahead and be, you know, bleach bitching, well, bleach-bidding whatever servers that they needed to just before the FBI was able to seize them. | ||
| The FBI, I guess, got a tip that the Attorney General had been communicating with Amanda Rinteria and just didn't investigate it. | ||
| Just decided that might be happening, but we're not going to be looking into it. | ||
| Okay, great. | ||
| Comey told the OIG that the FBI did not pursue these steps because the information in Blank's reports was not credible on its face, but it was true. | ||
| It was just, I guess the reports weren't credible, but the information was true. | ||
| Rep in mind around that one. | ||
| In this regard, Trisha Anderson told investigators that the director had said the assertion that the attorney general was pressuring him in connection to the mid-year exam investigation gave him doubts about the credibility of the two documents. | ||
| Okay, so again, it gets a little convoluted. | ||
| Trisha Anderson told investigators that the director had said the assertion that the attorney general was pressuring him in connection to the mid-year exam investigations gave him doubt as to the credibility of the two documents. | ||
| So basically saying because Attorney General Loretta Lynch is pressuring me, I've got doubts about the legitimacy of any of this. | ||
| In other words, they're trying to stop me from investigating it. | ||
| It's only raising my hackles and causing me to be more suspicious. | ||
| He also understood that Margoli's view was that pursuing such steps would take us down the path where, quote, we're investigating the Attorney General of the United States and that Margolis thought that you ought to have more of a reason to go forward with it than you have. | ||
| And remember, this was pretty much the same excuse that Comey used when dropping the investigation into Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Basically going, oh, this is a really big step and we really don't have the, we really need something more to take such a unprecedented step, investigating the Attorney General. | ||
| I mean, we got to really be sure. | ||
| But of course, I mean, they're all communicating with each other. | ||
| Comey himself knows that Loretta Lynch is trying to stop him from investigating. | ||
| So, I mean, it's just all bullcrap. | ||
| It's all hogwash. | ||
| They're all lying. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They know exactly the criminal activity they're involved in. | ||
| And they're just choosing, they're using their discretion as law enforcement agents to not investigate something that they don't want to find out about. | ||
| I would say that's a violation of their oath of office as they are, in fact, obligated to go after criminal activity, even, and I would say, especially when it's being committed by those at the highest level of government. | ||
| But they're choosing to not pursue something that they probably knew was true anyway because they know it's true. | ||
| In other words, if they didn't think Loretta Lynch was talking to the Hillary Clinton campaign, they probably would have investigated that because then they could come out and say, we've investigated it and we have found no collaborating evidence that this is happening. | ||
| We clear Loretta Lynch's name. | ||
| They would investigate it if it wasn't happening. | ||
| They know that it's happening, so they're not going to investigate it. | ||
| So instead of having to come out and say, yes, they are communicating, this is criminal and we're going to charge the attorney general with corruption and violation of her oath of office and violation of classified information and just working with the criminal to, you know, scuttle the investigation. | ||
| I mean, it's just so, it's just so criminal. | ||
| It's just so ridiculously criminal. | ||
| And maybe it's easier to understand if you just put it in like a small town context where like the, you know, some whatever city city manager is under investigation by the local cops and the attorney general of the city is feeding them information about the cops investigation. | ||
| There's a murder case and the suspected murderer is getting inside information from the mayor of the city going, hey, the police are going to go search your cabin. | ||
| You better go clean it out right now. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Just helping them get away with the crime, telling them what the investigation is doing in order to help them get away with the crime. | ||
| I mean, this is just patently criminal. | ||
| I'm sorry, I said I wouldn't try to exaggerate just every one of these lines. | ||
| When you really think about what they're saying, you see the true scale, scope, the ubiquity of this deception, deceit, corruption, manipulation, psyop campaign. | ||
| The FBI received additional information from T1 regarding a possible Clinton campaign plan. | ||
| After receiving intelligence in 2016, FBI subsequently received additional intelligence from TI, particularly in late July 2016. | ||
| They received a report that summarized certain hacked emails allegedly sent by Leonard Bernardo of the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| Again, that's the other aspect of this is that you have George Soros, who himself, by the way, is a foreigner, at the center of all of this. | ||
| The memorandum stated that Clinton approved a plan proposed by one of her foreign policy advisors, Julianne Smith, to, quote, smear Donald Trump by magnifying the scandal tied to intrusion by the Russian special services in the pre-election process to benefit the Republican candidate. | ||
| The translated draft memorandum stated in relevant part, according to the data from the election campaign headquarters of Hillary Clinton obtained via the U.S. George Soros Foundation on the 26th of July, 2016, Clinton approved a plan of her policy advisor, Juliana Smith, from the T's NAB, that's an unknown acronym, to smear Donald Trump by magnifying the scandal tied to the intrusion of the Russian special services in the pre-election process to benefit the Republican candidate. | ||
| As envisioned by Smith, raising the theme of Putin's support for Trump to the level of the Olympics scandal would divert the constituents' attention from the investigation of Clinton's compromised electronic correspondence. | ||
| All right, let me read that one again. | ||
| As envisioned by Smith, raising the theme of Putin's support for Trump to the level of the Olympics scandal, and I don't even know what that, does anybody remember what the Olympics scandal was? | ||
| I don't remember that one. | ||
| But suffice it to say, they're saying that if we're able to drum up this scandal, if we're able to manufacture evidence and we're to create out of whole cloth a scandal about Trump being associated with Putin and drive that through the media and force that into the conversation and drive it to such a pitch of attention that's equal to one of these other scandals like the Olympic scandal that will divert constituents' attention from the investigation of Clinton's compromised electronic correspondence. | ||
| So according to this paragraph, hidden for nine years, in this translated memorandum, I believe from the Soros Foundation or something else. | ||
| Oh, by the way, at the time, Smith worked for the Center for New American Security, CNAS, and was serving as a Clinton campaign foreign policy advisor. | ||
| She advised investigators where never received notification that her account was hacked, but was aware that CNAS was regularly challenged by friends in China and Russia. | ||
| So again, CNAS is one of the organizations that helps to facilitate all of this corruption and manipulation. | ||
| And of course, is one of the main nodes whenever we like to play old Wikipedia hopscotch. | ||
| All the evil people are all a part of CNAS and PNAC and all these acronyms. | ||
| So anyway, what they admit here, just in no uncertain terms and in black and white, is that they, in part, came up with the Russia collusion hoax, admitting it's a hoax and knowing it's a hoax, drumming up the scandal that they knew was fake, at least in part to literally just distract from Hillary Clinton's email scandal. | ||
| Literally. | ||
| They said it would divert the constituents' attention away from the investigation of Clinton's compromise electronic correspondence. | ||
| So just, if you're a Democrat, if you've ever, or God forbid, if you still have ever given credence to the Russia collusion hoax by Trump, you get that you're a sucker, right? | ||
| You're a sucker and you fell for it. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Hillary Clinton's the criminal. | ||
| She was under investigation. | ||
| She was corresponding with the attorney general. | ||
| She was deleting her email server to hide the evidence. | ||
| Just rampant, blatant, pay-for-play, criminal corruption. | ||
| And they launched this utterly falsified dog and pony show about Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. | ||
| And you, like an absolute sucker, the biggest goober, dumbass mark in the world, followed the laser pointer. | ||
| You followed the bouncing ball. | ||
| You let her distract you with a shiny toy so she could get away with all of her criminality, manipulate you to go after her enemies who hadn't done anything wrong, were not under investigation, and had never used the office of Secretary of State to enrich herself by selling out your country from underneath you. | ||
| So anybody that fell for this Russia collusion from the beginning should have realized or should know now, and it's really incontrovertible, you are a sucker and you fell for it, you absolute idiots. | ||
| That should distract people from her own missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level and apparent reference to the revelations of massive state-sponsored doping campaign by Russia following the 2014 Winter Games in Sochio. | ||
| In addition, by subsequently steering public opinion towards the notion that it needs to equate, quote, Putin's efforts to influence political processes in the U.S. via cyberspace to act against a crucially important infrastructure resembling a national power network would force the White House to use a more confrontational scenarios vis-à-vis Moscow that as a whole suits Clinton's line of conduct. | ||
| This is what I mean. | ||
| This is what I was talking about in the beginning of the show. | ||
| We've always said there's a reason that it was Russia That they wanted to associate Donald Trump with. | ||
| And it's because they have planned to go after Russia for a long time. | ||
| And they've worked inside Ukraine for a very long time with the ultimate goal of committing regime change in Russia, going to war in Ukraine, siphoning all of the wealth they possibly can from that country through a variety of corrupt agreements. | ||
| And they were worried that Trump was going to come in and make peace with Russia and look into what was going on in Ukraine and find out about all the corruption. | ||
| And of course, that's what he did. | ||
| And that was the first impeachment that they launched. | ||
| But just understand, like the war with Russia that we're currently involved in and exacerbating was planned a long time ago. | ||
| And this planned specifically to spread the hoax about Trump and Putin was designed to keep America and Russia at odds with one another, on the wrong foot with one another, so that eventually America could launch a war against Russia and pretend to be the defenders. | ||
| Get all of NATO to go along with it. | ||
| And this gets a lot more important, and I'll go to some tweets from Mike Binns here in just a second about this idea of the cyberspace cyber acts, cyber attacks against crucially important infrastructure. | ||
| So basically, in addition to subsequently steering public opinion towards the notion it needs to equate Putin's efforts to influence political processes in the U.S. via cyberspace to acts against a crucially important infrastructure resembling so in other words they say if we spread this lie that Putin is trying to hack the presidential campaign we'll be able to sort of morph that into threats against our critical infrastructure and what they were trying to do and succeeded in doing by spreading this misinformation was getting Barack Obama | ||
| to come out and make aggressive statements against Russia, driving the wedge between Russia and America farther. | ||
| As they say, this would force the White House to use a more confrontational footing vis-a-vis Moscow that as a whole suits Clinton's line of conduct. | ||
| Translation, by lying about Russia's involvement with Donald Trump, not only do you A, distract from Clinton's own email server and the illegal investigation into it, B, associate Trump with Putin and create a bunch of scandal for him and force him on the defensive through your lies, three, force Russia and America into the paradigm of enemies, just guaranteeing that no | ||
| potential alliance forms there, four, gives you the ability to claim that the attacks on the election or attacks on critical infrastructure are therefore an act of war and further aggravate the conflict with Putin. | ||
| And of course, five, if you associate Trump with Putin, then once he's in office, if he ever gets in office, he'll be hamstrung by that insinuation and will be unable to pursue his own goals and will be forced, in fact, to pursue the line of action that the Clintons, aka the deep state, have established for him. | ||
| A relatively sluggish reaction by the administration to the events surrounding the DNC that led to the resignation of Chairman Deborah Wasserman Schultz provoked exasperation within the PC, possibly a political convention, and the entire deep state, which is hilarious that they just referenced the deep state in this article from 2016 with the capital letters as if it's just a real thing. | ||
| No, no quotation marks around this. | ||
| Which may also be used by Clinton to reinforce her position among these security service agents. | ||
| Clinton supporters in the FBI lack conclusive information | ||
| irrefutable evidence of the Russia Federation's involvement in the scandal tied to the theft of the DNC's correspondence in the meantime during the launch investigation there's been a multitude of circumstantial evidence that the alias of Gusafer 2.0 the name of the hacker who accepted responsibility for the incident was in fact used to cover up a special unit of the GRU of the Russian defense ministry's general staff during the first stage of the campaign due to lack of direct evidence it was decided to disseminate the necessary information through the FBI affiliated addict based technical structures that are involved in cybersecurity in particular the | ||
| crowd strike and threat connect companies from where the information would then be disseminated through leading U.S. publications in addition it is presumed in the FBI that in the future any clumsy propaganda campaign by the GRU is bound to lead to the emergence of more reliable indications of Moscow's involvement which would imminently intensify the U.S. confrontational tendencies towards Russia so again they're trying to foster the confrontational tendencies towards Russia they're using crowd strike to launder information from the intelligence community through | ||
| the media or as they put it it would be disseminated through leading U.S. publications the next part is massively redacted but you basically have blank memorandum blank contains blank a reference to the Atlantic Council a think tank based in DC another blank the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace according to an FBI analyst interviewed by the office U.S. institution that was the source of the relevant of the hacked U.S. institution that was the source of the relevant U.S. communications the above reference memorandum included the English text of the document one blank | ||
| blank blank as discussed above the document contained purported email from bernardo appears to have been partially uh based there blank of the document which contained the following text from leonardo bernardo july 25th 2016 so yeah just all right so we've got the atlantic council we've got the open society foundation we've got the carnegie endowment who knows what's behind any of these other uh redacted segments we've got the clinton global | ||
| initiative we've got obama and his team with loretta lynch we've got the fbi i mean all of these are cabals right and you can see they're all working with each other they're all covering up for each other they're also pressuring each other they're you know wielding information against one another they're collaborating while pretending to be at odds they're at odds while they're pretending to collaborate i mean this is a view behind the curtain this is how the sausage gets made this is not speculation because we've been able to speculate and | ||
| we've been pretty much dead on on all of this from the little hints that we've seen we have been pretty much Dead on, 100% accurate about everything that we assumed was happening behind the scenes. | ||
| This is in their own words, from their own information, exactly what happened with names, dates, times, and verbatim communications. | ||
| Again, confirming pretty much everything that we've known. | ||
| And actually, it's even worse. | ||
| Actually, we were not sure and not aware of just how involved George Soros' Open Society Foundation was in this. | ||
| We didn't realize how blatantly they were communicating about, yeah, the FBI is looking for stuff, but they aren't going to find it because all the evidence was on the servers we deleted. | ||
| Like, we knew that was true, but we haven't had it admitted. | ||
| We haven't had the confession of it yet until now. | ||
| This gets so much bigger. | ||
| This gets so much bigger. | ||
| And it sort of starts with the email we're about to read from Leonard Bernardo. | ||
| But Mike Bins is going crazy about this. | ||
| Because of the insinuation that Russia affecting the, or interfering in the election, was them attacking critical infrastructure and how that critical infrastructure resilience was then used as the basis and the establishment of the entire censorship industrial complex. | ||
| That's how he puts it. | ||
| He says, holy effing crap, this is the gosh darn classified index that has been classified for nine gosh darn years. | ||
| This is where they cooked up the critical infrastructure hoax that created the legal predicate cover for the entire censorship industrial complex. | ||
| It's all been a scheme. | ||
| It's all been a giant charade. | ||
| All the people that we told you were involved were involved. | ||
| They all collaborated. | ||
| They all thought they were going to get away with it because they really thought with all this scheming, with all this criminality, with all this gangsterism and mafia tactics and deception and psychopaths and cover-ups, they never thought in a million years that would fail. | ||
| How do you scheme so much and still fail? | ||
| How can you be so corrupt and still fit? | ||
|
unidentified
|
In the power of conversation into the caller's hands, you're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal, 933 Central Standard Timer. | ||
| We're halfway through the show today. | ||
| I'm making our way. | ||
| We're making our way slowly but surely through this publication by Chuck Grassley. | ||
| And every one of these pages has revelations. | ||
| Every one of the revelations entails so much. | ||
| You can dig down into it. | ||
| But I don't want to lose the forest for the trees. | ||
| And just try to lay out like what... | ||
| So far, what we've learned, first of all, is that everything revealed in this has been known for years as this was gathered and written and established and then classified years ago. | ||
| It is again the classified appendix to the investigation arising out of the 2016 presidential campaigns. | ||
| This is the addendum to the Durham report that was hidden and now finally revealed. | ||
| What we've learned is that Russian intelligence hacked and gained unlawful access to emails of numerous U.S. public and private entities, including government agencies, nonprofit organizations, and think tanks, including the Open Societies Foundation, which at the time was known as the Soros Foundation. | ||
| And they found emails between Leonard Bernardo, who at the time was the Regional Director for Eurasia at the Open Societies Foundation, coordinating with Debbie Washerman Schultz to orchestrate the entire Russia collusion hoax from the beginning with the cooperation of Obama, his Department of Justice, and the FBI. | ||
| So we learned that this was all quarterbacked and supervised and coordinated by the Open Societies Foundation in collaboration with Debbie Washerman Schultz, who at the time was the head of the DNC. | ||
| We discovered that the FBI was investigating Hillary Clinton because of pay-for-play, where Hillary Clinton, as director of the State Department, Secretary of the State Department, gave preferential treatment to people who donated to the Clinton Foundation. | ||
| They were trying to investigate those claims, but couldn't because, as they admit, the timely deletion of relevant data from mail servers. | ||
| Okay, so again, in this document, we have that the FBI was investigating Hillary Clinton because the State Department was giving preferential treatment, pay-for-play, with people who donated to the Clinton global initiative, but that all of that business was done on illegal off-site email servers that were wiped before the FBI could seize them. | ||
| In addition to that, Obama had no intention to darken the final part of his presidency and legacy. | ||
| So in order to protect his own legacy and preserve his own so-called supposedly scandal-free presidency, Barack Obama sent Attorney General Loretta Lynch to lean on and try to pressure Comey to drop the investigation into Hillary Clinton. | ||
| In addition to that, he is said to have given orders to activate all levers of control under his authority as executive, as head of the executive branch to try to stop this investigation into Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Barack Obama sanctioned the use of all administrative levers to remove possible negative effects from the FBI investigation of cases related to the Clinton Foundation and the email correspondence of the State Department. | ||
| We also heard that the political director of the Hillary Clinton staff, Amanda Rinteria, Was receiving regular updates from Loretta Lynch advising her as to the plans and intentions of the FBI so that they could stay ahead of it and avoid having them find evidence of their criminal activity. | ||
| Then they lay out, in no uncertain terms, how they were going to be releasing this information about Trump and trying to associate him with members of the Russian mafia and later directly with Putin because of a couple of reasons, because they wanted to obviously frame Trump, but they also obviously wanted to drive a wedge between America and Russia. | ||
| They wanted to decrease the likelihood that Trump, if he ever did get power, would be able to end their long-laid plans for eventual war with Russia, the Third World War, regime change, eliminating Russia as a nationalist barrier to their globalist schemes. | ||
| We have all the names of all the people involved in this. | ||
| Christopher Steele, Glenn Simpson, Fusion GPS, Andrew McCabe, James Traynor, James Rubiki, David Margolis. | ||
| They all knew the information wasn't credible. | ||
| They all knew that there was no legitimacy to the claim of Trump in Russia. | ||
| And there's a bit of sort of confusion with this when we get to the other parts because, you know, in the beginning, it's framed almost like the FBI under James Comey really was trying to go after Clinton and trying to investigate her. | ||
| And Obama and Loretta Lynch were trying to stop him. | ||
| And there was this, you know, internal conflict between the FBI, who was trying to pursue justice, and the Democrat operatives who are trying to stop them. | ||
| But then later, you see the FBI is perfectly willing. | ||
| And you'll see, I mean, the phrase they use is throw oil on the problem, throw oil on the fire, right? | ||
| The FBI was willing to collaborate with these liars to perpetuate the lie that Donald Trump was associated with Russia. | ||
| And we'll show you that in just a second. | ||
| So again, all the different reasons why they'd want to associate Trump with Putin, primarily to distract from the investigation of Hillary Clinton, but also to set up this idea that Putin was attacking critical infrastructure, crucial infrastructure, which if you remember, Hillary Clinton said during the campaign, you know, cyber attacks will be treated as real war. | ||
| So if Russia is attacking our infrastructure, then we'll treat that as an act of war and we'll respond militarily. | ||
| So they're setting all this up. | ||
| Again, just insane warmongers starting wars, lying relentlessly, total corruption, total conspiracy behind the scenes, coordinated by the open societies and CNAS, these unelected, foreign-operated think tanks with ultimate power in this country, including the Atlantic Council, including the Carnegie Endowment, including CNAS. | ||
| I mean, again, we're eight pages into this 30-page thing and it's already like a checklist, the who's who of the conspiracy array. | ||
| So from Leonard Bernardo on July 25th, 2016. | ||
| Hi, the media analysis on the DNC hacking appears solid. | ||
| This is an important story because it would be the first time that we know of that a state deliberately uses the infiltration and publication of data to interfere in the U.S. election. | ||
| At the same time, politization is on the table. | ||
| I've been a bit surprised that nobody has mentioned this 18-month-long story yet in their analysis and makes explicit reference to U.S. elections at the end. | ||
| Julie, this appears to be reference to the Clinton foreign policy advisor referenced in the memorandum, Julianne Smith, right? | ||
| So this was the person that supposedly came up with the whole idea in the first place, going, hey, let's associate Trump with Putin. | ||
| She's a CNAS operative who came with that idea to Clinton. | ||
| Obviously, she's working with Leonard Bernardo in the Open Society Foundation to bring about this hoax as well. | ||
| Julie says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Trump and Putin. | ||
| Again, remember, all this stuff is from 2016 when they were sure that Hillary Clinton was going to win. | ||
| We read it earlier. | ||
| There was no doubt in their mind that Hillary Clinton was on the path to victory. | ||
| So keep that in mind in this context. | ||
| They're all working under the assumption that Hillary Clinton will soon be president. | ||
| So the association with Putin and Trump was a long-term plan, not just to stop Trump in the interim, not just to distract from Hillary Clinton's emails. | ||
| Those are also positives from this scheme that they would see. | ||
| But more importantly, it was a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump. | ||
| Say now it is good for post-convention bounce. | ||
| Later, the FBI will put more oil into the fire. | ||
| Outcome is far from clear as Americans are more keen on their own woes, and Hillary is hardly good-looking as far as credibility is concerned. | ||
| Anyway, things are ghastly for U.S.-Russian relations. | ||
| Yeah, because of them. | ||
| Things are ghastly for U.S.-Russian relations because you keep telling lies about Russia in order to completely sabotage U.S.-Russian relations. | ||
| It'll be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump, saying later the FBI will pour more oil onto the fire. | ||
| So the FBI is not really at odds with these people. | ||
| I mean, the FBI, you know, earlier they pretend they're trying to get Hillary and that's not true. | ||
| It's not true. | ||
| They're coordinating. | ||
| Apparently, they're in communication with the Open Society Foundation under Mr. Bernardo, who has assurances from them that, yeah, we'll throw oil on the fire later. | ||
| We'll come out with some information that makes it seem like all this is legitimate. | ||
| So the FBI is in on this. | ||
| They may be, you know, negotiating with Loretta Lynch in the background, but they're in on this. | ||
| And they knew this was going on and they were working with these criminals, which is why they were never brought to justice. | ||
| Blank also received from T1 a slightly different version of this email. | ||
| This version includes a statement, quote, later the FBI will put more oil onto the fire and contains an added sentence. | ||
| They say, anyway, it should last as long as the Olympics accusation and things are ghastly for Russian relations. | ||
| I can't help but think they keep mentioning these Olympics thing. | ||
| It sounds like the Olympics accusations was just another scam they ran. | ||
| They keep referencing it like, hey, remember how successful we were with that Olympics scandal? | ||
| So going back, I wouldn't be surprised if the Olympic scandal was just absolutely fraudulent. | ||
| I mean, I'm sure I assumed it was anyway. | ||
| And I guess the Olympic scandal was about Russia doping at the Sochi Olympics, and they keep talking about it like, hey, you know that scam we ran where we created the big scandal about the Olympics for Russia? | ||
| Let's do that again with Trump this time. | ||
| So that's interesting. | ||
| Blank also obtained information from the Sensitive Intelligence Collection. | ||
| Blank, an email dated the following day. | ||
| The FBI's translation of the email is as follows. | ||
| Great. | ||
| A whole bunch of material appeared in the press today regarding the subject. | ||
| It appears that the news around Gusseffer's Russian background is tightening. | ||
| I suggest doing Tien writing something about a task from somebody. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Some dark forces like the FBI, for instance, or better yet, Clinton sympathizers in IC, intelligence community, Pentagon, Deep State, or somewhere else. | ||
| Again, this is from 2016, and they're just referencing the deep state that they're a part of. | ||
| Like the FBI, the Pentagon, the Deep State. | ||
| You know, the Deep State. | ||
| Let's get them to do something. | ||
| And they're like, the deep state doesn't exist. | ||
| Meanwhile, in their own correspondences, they're going, should we get the deep state on this? | ||
| I think the deep state could really help us here. | ||
| About American websites deploying a campaign to demonize the actions of Russia's GRU, acting in accordance with VVP, that's Vladimir Putin, to undermine the forces of good in the elections in the interests of Donald Trump, who's basically an agent of influence, using in-ept GRU operatives. | ||
| There is such information and their general inclination of adventurism and idiocy. | ||
| A number of crucial technical implications pointing to Russia were exposed and so on. | ||
| Will that be okay? | ||
| Again, just coordinating, manipulating all of this. | ||
| Another email dated July 27, 2016 appears to discuss, quote, making something to illuminate how Clinton was attempting to vilify Moscow and discredit Putin and Trump. | ||
| Again, just totally, totally manipulating everything, just totally lying in order to start a war. | ||
| The email attached the following English text in a document, which appears to be another email from Bernardo, bearing a date of July 27th, 2016. | ||
| Hi. | ||
| Hillary Rodham Clinton approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russia hackers hampering U.S. elections. | ||
| That should distract people from our own missing email, especially if the affair goes to the Olympic level. | ||
| The point is making the Russian play a U.S. domestic issue. | ||
| Say something like critical infrastructure threat for the election to feel menace since both POTUS and VPOTIS have acknowledged the fact ICU would speed up searching for evidence that is regrettably still unavailable. | ||
| However, there seems to be signs GRU penetration. | ||
| They appear hardly skilled, incompetent bumbling idiots, and SMB somebody called them in absence of direct evidence. | ||
| CrowdStrike and Threat Connect will supply the media and GRU will hopefully carry on to give more facts. | ||
| Say something like critical infrastructure threat, since both POTUS and the vice president have acknowledged the fact that ICU would speed up searching for evidence that is regrettably still unavailable, saying basically there's no evidence that they can present, but in absence of direct evidence, CrowdStrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media. | ||
| Okay, so they'll come up with the information to feed to the media to run with this story. | ||
| Again, it's almost like we should be making a whiteboard with red string connecting all these things. | ||
| CrowdStrike, Open Societies Foundation, Atlantic Council, Carnegie Endowment, CNAS, the DNC, the Obama cabal, the FBI. | ||
| I mean, it's just this massive tangled web where they're all manipulating, they're all working with each other. | ||
| They're all manipulating information. | ||
| They're all laundering information through various organs to boost credibility, as we explained earlier, where you have this whole across-the-board broad spectrum approach where everybody's reporting the same thing. | ||
| It must be true. | ||
| On the authenticity of the Bernardo emails, the office interviewed numerous FBI personnel who were involved in crossfire hurricane or related intelligence efforts to determine whether they could shed light on potential reliability or unreliability of the information about the possible Clinton campaign plan. | ||
| Certain blank analysts and officers whom the office interviewed and whom were well-versed in the sensitive intelligence collection stated that their best assessment was that the Bernardo emails were likely authentic. | ||
| Multiple analysts noted that the Russians had, in fact, hacked Bernardo's emails. | ||
| Some analysts also noted it was possible, however, that the Russians might have fabricated or altered purported U.S. emails. | ||
| But some of these analysts also noted that sensitive information was blank. | ||
| And so here we can jump over. | ||
| And I mean, it just goes on and on. | ||
| And again, this is just an absolutely amazing tranche of documents that lays out just absolutely everything, how this was all carried out. | ||
| And again, this is all different, by the way, than anything that Tulsi Gabbard has presented. | ||
| Because I kept saying then, it was suspicious to me that they were only submitting things about after Trump was elected, right? | ||
| After the election. | ||
| But before he was inaugurated, Obama and Comey got up to a bunch of stuff. | ||
| And, you know, they were hiding the real intelligence briefings and changing definitions to confuse things. | ||
| But that was all after the election. | ||
| Everything happening here, this is all before the election. | ||
| This is all to rig the election beforehand, which is good that we're finally getting to the real heart of the matter. | ||
| But it goes on and on. | ||
| And honestly, you need to read it for yourself. | ||
| But Mike Benz points out, as we said earlier, that this critical infrastructure threat is the legal predicate cover for the entire censorship industrial complex. | ||
| He says, super short story version on Joe Rogan of how this plot set in motion above, say something about critical infrastructure threat to elections to feel menace from today's classified annex snowballed into the disinformation governance control to control social media speech. | ||
| Note, for example, how DHS, who mass censored virtually the entire Trump movement during the 2020 election, got away with censoring by citing power to quote, protect critical infrastructure of elections from quote misinformation. | ||
| Self-aware, they bumped up against the First Amendment. | ||
| DHS's social media censorship council led by its outside censorship partners, Vijaya Gadi, the head of censorship at Twitter 1.0, and Kate Starbird, who was named Protecting Critical Infrastructure from Misinformation and Disinformation Council for the Same scam legal reasons. | ||
| If you were censored in 2020 for questioning mail-in ballots or voting machines, this classified annex today is why. | ||
| There's a medium-length, here's a medium-length primer on how the U.S. government used this unbelievably deceitful, false predicate of critical infrastructure to censor millions in the 2020 election cycle. | ||
| On January 6th, 2017, two weeks before Trump took office, two latch-ditch ops were launched at once. | ||
| One, the Obama intelligence community launched RussiaGate with formal utter BS report claiming Russia interfered in the election. | ||
| And two, DHS took federal control over elections by designating the metaphysical concept of elections as critical infrastructure under its own domain. | ||
| All 50 states opposed DHS doing this, but the outgoing Obama federal government steamrolled all 50 states anyway. | ||
| So again, this label of critical infrastructure has had very long-term and devastating effects. | ||
| But I mean, this is just what they do, right? | ||
| It's why they say anti-Semitism is a health crisis. | ||
| It's not elections are critical infrastructure, and anti-Semitism is a health crisis, and it's just whatever they have, whatever label they have to put on whatever they're trying to control. | ||
| It's just very simple, blatant manipulation, rhetorical fallacy. | ||
| And in fact, this is exactly the time sequence of how it played out on January 6, 2017. | ||
| First, at 1.41 p.m., Congress certified Trump's election win. | ||
| Then with Trump's win now final and no hope left for the intelligence community to obstruct it, then suddenly, magically, the entire joint U.S. intelligence community assessment drops just four hours later with the report directly insinuating Trump's win was illegitimate because Russia interfered to help Trump win. | ||
| Then suddenly, magically, DHS, just 30 minutes after that, swoops in with a permanent unilateral federal designation that it has taken over state-level control of voting systems, which we'd had in this country for 230 years, citing the intelligence community's BS new report, which ODNI and CIA clearly held back until the very moment Trump was certified president. | ||
| So his first hours began with him immediately tarred as illegitimate and possibly criminal. | ||
| This is the deep state. | ||
| This is the conspiracy. | ||
| This is it. | ||
| And it just goes on and on, folks. | ||
| I'll go ahead and pull in that at least one of these videos by Mike Benz. | ||
| He's been on top of this. | ||
| But like I said, we've all known that this was the case. | ||
| We've all known, at least in part, or not in specific, but in a vague way, it's been obvious the entire time how this was coordinated, who was coordinating it, how it was going on. | ||
| Remember the Tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch right at the height of the Clinton email scandal, James Comey coming out and saying that, yes, Hillary Clinton probably broke the law, but no, we're not going to be charging her for it. | ||
| I mean, all of this has been obvious, but to actually have the names and the times and the communications and the way they're so blatant about it, yeah, we got to release this to distract from the email investigation. | ||
| The email investigation is not going to go anywhere because we already wiped the servers with all the illegal activity on it. | ||
| And that's another aspect of this that it really is like the fractal conspiracy. | ||
| It's like all of this starts with this activity from the Clinton Global Fund collaborating with the State Department in order to give people benefits. | ||
| Even that is not really the worst that they were involved in. | ||
| And as we said from the beginning, deleting the emails, yes, was a crime. | ||
| Having the off-site server, yes, that in and of itself was a crime. | ||
| But that crime was only committed in furtherance of other crimes, in order to cover up other crimes, including crimes like sending missiles to terrorist groups that are capable of taking down passenger airplanes. | ||
| The weapons shipments moving through Libya, being sent to the moderate rebels who eventually now have taken over Syria and are systematically oppressing and murdering Christians and Alawites in that country, destroying 2,000-year-old edifices because of their Muslim extremism. | ||
| So like all of this, all the criminal activity that we've been through in just the first 13 pages of this document were all just a cover-up. | ||
| It was all just a cover-up for the other criminal activity that Clinton was involved in, the email server, which itself was there just to facilitate the criminal activity. | ||
| She was involved in running guns, taking pay-for-play bribes through the Clinton initiative. | ||
| I mean, it's insane. | ||
| It truly is insane. | ||
| How you've just got crime, you've got cover-up on top of crime, on top of cover-up, on top of crime, all in furtherance of starting a war to get a million people killed and overthrow Vladimir Putin for no particular reason. | ||
| For no legitimate, discernible, valid reason whatsoever. | ||
| The deep state just decided we need an enemy. | ||
| We need to go to war with Russia. | ||
| We need to keep them on the back burner as a potential existential enemy to start a world war with. | ||
| So we can't have us being too cozy with them. | ||
| And again, it does just go on and on. | ||
| You got Robbie Mook, Mook getting involved in here. | ||
| Mook suggests Russians leaked DNC emails to help Trump, just pushing this absolute lie that they all knew was a lie from the beginning to get the FISA warrants, to spy on Trump, to just, I mean, it's just blatant treason activity, total destruction of the democratic system as we know it. | ||
| And if these people aren't arrested, if Hillary Clinton isn't thrown in jail, if Barack Obama isn't charged with this, there really is no hope in our current system. | ||
| If they can be exposed to this level and still not pay the price for it, especially when you consider the immense amounts of human suffering that have come as a consequence of this, it is not a suggestion. | ||
| It's not a request. | ||
| It's a necessity. | ||
| It is mandatory. | ||
| These people have, have to be punished to the fullest extent of the law. | ||
| Period. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| It just has to happen. | ||
| Now, I got a lot of other videos to get to. | ||
| We'll move on a little bit. | ||
| We got Kamal Harris to make fun of. | ||
| We got Mel Gibson making some pretty crazy statements about Gavin Newsom and so much more. | ||
| I do want to remind you, go now to thealxjonestore.com. | ||
| There's a store-wide buy one, get one free super sale on all supplements and all merchandise, but only for VIP members. | ||
| And if you want to join the VIP Club, just take advantage of this sale. | ||
| I wouldn't blame you. | ||
| It's worth it. | ||
| I mean, it's that good of a sale. | ||
| Go now, sign up for the VIP Club, get the discount, buy your supplements, get them for 50% off, buy one, get one. | ||
| Same difference. | ||
| Go to thealconestore.com slash characters and collect news. | ||
| We'll be back in the third hour on the other side. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Daniel Boone was a man. | |
| Yes, a big man. | ||
| With an eye like an eagle and as tall as a mouth was be. | ||
| Daniel Boone was a man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, a big man. | |
| He was brave, he was fearless, and as tough as a mighty tree. | ||
| From the coonskin cap on the top of old hand through the heel of his ball-hide shoes. | ||
| The ripplingness, roaring this fightiness man, the frontier ever used. | ||
| Daniel Boone was. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We're just pretending we grew up in the 50s here. | ||
| I don't know why. | ||
| People have been posing about Daniel Boone a lot, so I thought we'd come in with a classic Fez Parker song. | ||
| Which, by the way, if you have kids, go right now. | ||
| On whatever your music app of choice is, search Fez Parker. | ||
| He has a whole album that's all just songs like that about all the founding fathers. | ||
| It's really amazing. | ||
| Andrew Jackson, you got the George Washington song, Daniel Boone, obviously Davey Crockett, classic. | ||
| And I'll tell you, they'll become your kids' favorite songs, and then they'll know all about Texas history. | ||
| Jim Bowie? | ||
| I want the crew to grab the Jim Bowie song as we go out because that's the best one on the album. | ||
| I don't know why this is. | ||
| So I guess it's Politico. | ||
| The online right's favorite nativist slogan is gaining traction in the real world. | ||
| Daniel Boone, burial plots, and no birthright citizen. | ||
| Welcome to MAGA, the MAGA world of Heritage America. | ||
| So I guess they're going after Daniel Boone now. | ||
| Politico, the online right is obsessed with Daniel Boone. | ||
| Me. | ||
| Did someone say Daniel Boone? | ||
| All these pictures of Daniel Boone. | ||
| Daniel Boone is awesome. | ||
| You should read The Frontiersman if you want a really good story that features Daniel Boone as a main character. | ||
| That one's great. | ||
| And it's great because the actual main character is just insane, incredible Frontiersman who just were just literal heroes. | ||
| And I mean, you just read this whole story about how brutal and difficult the settling of America was. | ||
| And just the truly it's kind of an insane drive of the Americans to settle the frontier that it's like, it's just hard to comprehend the risk these people were taking. | ||
| I mean, it was crazy. | ||
| They would just, you know, people would just take their families and get on boats, go down the Ohio River, and like 50% of them would just be slaughtered by Indians. | ||
| And they would know that. | ||
| And there'd be boats full of people going down the river. | ||
| And like the last people that went down the river would come floating past them, you know, with the raft on fire and everybody dead, tomahawks in their heads. | ||
| And they'd go, well, they were unlucky. | ||
| Let's see how we do. | ||
| And they would just go right. | ||
| It was just crazy. | ||
| And Daniel Boone was kind of the funniest one because he would always go out to the frontier and he'd go beyond civilization. | ||
| He'd go somewhere where nobody was. | ||
| And he'd, you know, he had a big family. | ||
| So he and his family would go and they'd set up an outpost somewhere and everybody would flock to him. | ||
| All the other settlers would go, oh, you know, Boone's got a new town. | ||
| We'll go there because they'd know it was safe because it was so dangerous on the frontier. | ||
| They would all, you know, swarm to where Daniel Boone was. | ||
| And then suddenly there'd be like, you know, four or five families where he was. | ||
| He'd be like, I'm too closed in. | ||
| I'm too boxed in around here. | ||
| And he'd go even further. | ||
| And then that process would happen again. | ||
| But it was like, you know, some of the guys, like the main character in Frontiersman, he liked the little towns. | ||
| He would go out to a frontiers town and he liked having the little community there. | ||
| But then you had the Daniel Boons who like, even that was too much civilization for him and they would have to go even further. | ||
| So Daniel Boone was one of these restless spirits that just took on unbelievable risk, incredible heroism, incredible strength and human understanding. | ||
| And so we honor him here at Infowars. | ||
| We honor him at my house. | ||
| And everybody who cares about America should go read specifically about Daniel Boone and the settling of the Pennsylvania wilderness. | ||
| Then read about Jim Bowie. | ||
| Jim Bowie was kind of just a criminal. | ||
| Jim Bowie just stabbed people with a knife and took land that wasn't his. | ||
| But they were all awesome. | ||
| These are Heritage Americans, folks, and everybody knows it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're watching the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch live right now at man.video. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I just remembered I gotta find a video that I saw yesterday of Congress people, Congresswomen mostly, questioning the Secretary of State, or I'm sorry, the Secretary of Defense. | ||
| I gotta find it. | ||
| I was watching it yesterday and I genuinely like I couldn't tell if it was a skit or not. | ||
| Some of the questions they were asking him were just almost beyond belief, but not quite for these Democratic senators or Congress, these Congress ladies. | ||
| I'll have to find that video and go to it. | ||
| But I got so many videos to get to in this final hour of the broadcast about a number of different topics, obviously. | ||
| I think we'll start with Ol Kamala. | ||
| Our good friend Kamala Harris, I guess, went on Stephen Colbert, which is kind of symbolic, kind of beautiful in a way. | ||
| You've got maybe the worst presidential candidate in living memory being interviewed by a dead man walking, by a man whose show has already been canceled, and he's just waiting for the guillotine to drop. | ||
| Let's go to some of these clips. | ||
| Let's go to clip 21st. | ||
| Kamala completely dodges and changes the subject when asked very simple questions. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Walk on stage at that debate and it did not go well. | ||
| Spoiler, it did not go well in that debate. | ||
| Therefore, you became the candidate. | ||
| At what point in the, say, month that followed that did people start saying, you might need to be prepared for this? | ||
| Let me say something about Joe Biden. | ||
| I have an incredible amount of respect for him. | ||
| And I think that the way that we should be thinking about where we are right now is to remember that we had a President of the United States who believed in the rule of law, who believed in the importance of aspiring to have integrity and to do the work on behalf of the people. | ||
| And that's where I'll leave that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I think that's a fine sentiment and all true. | ||
| I'm just curious, did people say to you, you should be prepared for this? | ||
| There were some who did, but listen, it was Joe's decision, and he made that decision. | ||
| Uh... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| That's just kind of a weird thing to say, isn't it? | ||
| That was Joe's decision. | ||
| He made that decision. | ||
| I wasn't even really that suspicious that it wasn't Joe's decision until you felt the need to emphasize that it was. | ||
| We'll go to the next video now. | ||
| Try not to cringe here. | ||
| I think this is clip 19. | ||
| Yeah, this is clip 19. | ||
| This is Kamala Harris talking. | ||
| I guess she's got a new book out. | ||
| In case people wanted to know the exciting behind-the-scenes drama of the Kamala Harris campaign, it's just take a hint, lady. | ||
| Nobody's going to buy your book. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Here she is trying to sell her book to us. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| I mean, there's a lot of personal stuff in the book. | ||
| I mean, poor Dougie. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's wrong? | |
| For example, my birthday's in October. | ||
| The election's in November. | ||
| You see where I'm going. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And Dougie kind of dropped the ball at my big birthday. | |
| He didn't get you anything? | ||
| Oh, you have to read the book. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Tell me the page. | ||
| Tell me the page. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| What? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh. | |
| Imagine if she was our president. | ||
| God, can you even as much as much disappointment as I know a lot of us are experiencing with Trump? | ||
| God, thank your lucky stars. | ||
| We don't have to hear that every single day. | ||
| I mean, good lord. | ||
| Druggie, Dougie dropped the bomb. | ||
| See, my birthday is in October. | ||
| And the election's in November. | ||
| You get where I'm going. | ||
| It's like, what the hell are you talking about, lady? | ||
| Just, what are you talking about? | ||
| So if you want to know what Dougie got Kamala for her birthday, you'll have to buy her book, you guys. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 21. | ||
| This is Kamala on the future of the Democratic Party that she won't be a part of. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| You're not running for office right now. | ||
| You're stepping away from that life right now. | ||
| Who's leading the Democratic Party? | ||
| I'm just curious. | ||
| There are lots of leaders. | ||
| There's generally a leader of the Democratic Party. | ||
| You know, like, oh, that's the leader of the Democratic Party. | ||
| Who comes to mind? | ||
| I think there are a lot of. | ||
| I'm not going to go through names because then I'm going to leave somebody out and then I'm going to hear about it. | ||
| But let me just, let me say this. | ||
| I think it is a mistake for us who want to figure out how to get out and through this and get out of it to put it on the shoulders of any one person. | ||
| It's really on all of our shoulders. | ||
| It really is. | ||
| Madam Vice President, thank you so much for being here. | ||
| Good to hear with you, Steve. | ||
| What a hilarious cop-out. | ||
| Lady, you're telling me you don't know who the leader of the Democratic Party is? | ||
| I do. | ||
| Of course the Democratic Party has a leader. | ||
| He's got a forked tongue and carries a pitchfork. | ||
| The leader of the Democratic Party is Satan himself, lady. | ||
| She's like, we are Legion, actually. | ||
| We don't have a leader. | ||
| We are Legion. | ||
| We're just sort of a cacophony of demons, I guess, you could say. | ||
| So no particular leader in particular. | ||
| I don't want to leave anybody out. | ||
| No. | ||
| You know, the Democratic Party doesn't have a leader. | ||
| They are legion. | ||
| I just love the faux intellectualism. | ||
| Like, she's asked a very simple question. | ||
| Who's the leader of the Democratic Party? | ||
| And instead of just being like, ah, well, you know, just naming a name would be an easy thing to do. | ||
| Well, you know, Hakeem Jeffries is the minority leader. | ||
| I think he's doing great. | ||
| You know, Chuck Schumer has the experience and he's really been a steady hand on the tiller. | ||
| I think you could call him the leader. | ||
| Nancy Pelosi, probably the most recognizable Democrat in power. | ||
| There's so many answers, but instead it's like, well, listen, if we're going to handle this issue appropriately, you know, it's going to take all of us. | ||
| Just like, lady. | ||
| We just, can we just, just take a moment. | ||
| Thank God that this is probably the first and last time we will have to be hearing from Kamala Harris. | ||
| At least this year. | ||
| Maybe ever. | ||
| Seems like she's going to go away. | ||
| In fact, I was watching a clip yesterday. | ||
| I guess it was Fox, but I guess they had a Democrat on Fox, and she's trying to put a good spin on it. | ||
| And they're going, do you think Kamala Harris is going to throw her hat in the ring for the presidential candidacy? | ||
| And basically, in trying to respond to this question, it's like, long story short, Kamala Harris knows that she'd probably be knocked out in the first round of the primary. | ||
| And that would be incredibly embarrassing and an absolute death nail to her entire career. | ||
| So she's pursuing other options, right? | ||
| I don't think she's going to try to run for the primary. | ||
| And it's like, imagine running as your sole candidate, a person who wouldn't even make it through the first rounds of primary, let alone end up as one of the top contenders. | ||
| In a way, it's kind of like everything with the Democrats is like a, it's like a morality play. | ||
| It's like everything they do, you should be learning lessons from, right? | ||
| Take, for example, Obama tries to, apparently, according to the people in the know, he wants to preserve his legacy. | ||
| So he doesn't want the Hillary Clinton email scandal to break before he's out of office. | ||
| So he engages in a cover-up. | ||
| And it's just one of these metaphysical realities that doesn't seem true, but is, is that it just, it never, ever pays off in the long term to be corrupt or deceitful or to take the easy way out or take the shortcut. | ||
| Because now, instead of just having Hillary Clinton pay for her own crimes, be punished for what she did, you now have Obama implicated in the cover-up committee activities to where now a situation that really would not have been too big of a smear on his legacy, Hillary Clinton's Secretary of State, selling favors. | ||
| He could have actually, you know, he could have actually shown that he is who he pretends to be by going, hey, she was my Secretary of State, but if she broke the law, nobody's above the law and we'll hold her to account. | ||
| He didn't do that. | ||
| He tried to cover it up. | ||
| So now instead of successfully preserving his legacy, in doing that, he has utterly destroyed his legacy and in all reality should be going to jail. | ||
| With Kamala Harris, it's like you take this shortcut to the top. | ||
| You take this DEI higher advantage that you have to insert yourself into the competition. | ||
| And now you're just a complete embarrassment who has ruined any potential for a political career to where you're too scared to even throw your hat in the ring because of what an embarrassment it would be when you don't get any votes. | ||
| Like at any point, they can just stop causing these problems for themselves by not being corrupt, evil, criminal psychopaths, but they just honestly can't stop. | ||
| So they all have to go away now. | ||
| And they all have to go away. | ||
| We'll go to some more videos here. | ||
| Let's go to clip number nine here. | ||
| This is Mel Gibson giving a speech about the Pacific Palisades and making some pretty strident accusations against Governor Gavin Newsom, who, by the way, since we're on the topic, probably Gavin Newsome will be running for president and Kamal Harris is going to try to become the governor of California, which again, in a way, metaphysically, they sort of deserve. | ||
| California sort of deserves it. | ||
| So she'll probably succeed in that effort. | ||
| Let's go to clip number nine here. | ||
| This is Mel Gibson talking about the Pacific Palisade fire. | ||
| First, I'd like to express my sympathies to the people who lost so much. | ||
| They've lost everything. | ||
| Including loss of life. | ||
| All my fellow citizens, they've lost their homes. | ||
| They have no records, no insurance payout because the carriers dropped them. | ||
| Even the carriers realized that California was ill-prepared and had scant resources to deal with the inevitable fires. | ||
| They knew that. | ||
| So are we supposed to believe that our elected officials didn't know that? | ||
| Of course they knew that. | ||
| Of course, Mayor Bass tweeted about the levels of danger days before she blew out of town. | ||
| You know? | ||
| Next, I want to express my thanks and gratitude to the firefighters. | ||
| Yes, and the men and women who put their lives to battle these devastating wildfires. | ||
| I went for a ride in one of the engines with the firemen. | ||
| And we drove around in the PCH and into my neighborhood and various other neighborhoods. | ||
| Devastating there was, you know, I saw my houses and my friends and neighbors reduced to toxic piles of smoldering rubble. | ||
| Much like here in Albodena. | ||
| My this looks just like Malibu. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It does. | |
| Yeah. | ||
| Land prices should go up now. | ||
| The firefighters, I have to say, they were practically in tears. | ||
| You know why? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because they thought they had let us down. | |
| And I want to say loudly right here, you did not let us down. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You did not let us down. | |
| You're heroes. | ||
| Governor Newsom and Karen Bass let us all down. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Especially the fire department. | ||
| I mean, for the privilege of living in the beautiful state of California, we citizens in the state pay the highest tax levels in the USA. | ||
| It's 13.3%. | ||
| I paid my fair share, let me tell you. | ||
| And so has everyone here. | ||
| Now, for that kind of money, we deserve much more and much better, and there is absolutely no adequate excuse the governor or mayor can make for this gross mismanagement and failure to preemptively deal with what they knew was coming. | ||
| Was it incompetent? | ||
| Was it indifference? | ||
| Complacency? | ||
| Carelessness? | ||
| Was it negligence? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Was it criminal negligence? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They don't care. | |
| See, there are many who say that it is criminal negligence. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Absolutely. | ||
| Do the mayor and the governor give a damn about you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| Absolutely. | ||
| I mean, that's clear. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Now it's a governor. | ||
| Newsom since he's been in, whatever you call it, office. | ||
| Yeah, I see Governor Gibson in the future. | ||
| Mel Gibson loses Malibu Mansion to wildfires. | ||
| We're recording Joe Rogan podcast. | ||
| It's all in cinders. | ||
| So he lost his house. | ||
| And again, just making these points that it should be obvious to anybody if the insurance companies knew that this was a fire risk, how did the authorities not know? | ||
| Of course they knew. | ||
| It's the argument I always make. | ||
| If we knew that the COVID virus was a lab leak, how did the experts not know? | ||
| Of course they knew. | ||
| Of course they knew. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| It just sort of drops the little subtle statement there. | ||
| I bet land prices go up a lot now. | ||
| I bet we're going to benefit from this a lot. | ||
| Again, it's just, it's not that what's happening in America is like hard to deal with and that we've got all these permanent or intractable problems that are just so hard to handle. | ||
| It's like, no, you need, you know, it's almost like the, it's almost like the South Park episode with Imagination Land where they're trying to figure out the story and Mel Gibson comes in and is just like, you got to have him, you got to have him see something that exposes who the real person is, you know, or just a very simple, obvious, you know, twist in the story that makes the whole narrative make sense. | ||
| Like you just need somebody there that just wants to actually do a good job. | ||
| Generally, it doesn't have to be Mel Gibson. | ||
| It could literally be just find a dude who showed up for work every day for 20 years and just make him governor and everything would be fine. | ||
| It's not that these problems are difficult to solve. | ||
| It's not that they're difficult to handle. | ||
| How hard is it not to drain the water reserves? | ||
| You just don't drain them. | ||
| It's harder to actually drain them than it is not to drain them. | ||
| To me, it just goes to the heart of everything that's wrong in America, but specifically California in particular, where it's like, if we just had bare minimum competence, everything would be fine. | ||
| Americans are fine. | ||
| We know how to handle ourselves. | ||
| We handle our own property. | ||
| We handle our own business. | ||
| We make our own decisions. | ||
| And we just, you know, the government needs to be there on occasion to fill a pothole, arrest a criminal, put out a fire. | ||
| Other than that, if they would just leave us the hell alone, everything would be fine. | ||
| You know, it's like you could just see there, you know, Mel Gibson, if anything, and like, you know, one of the reasons his popularity has always been so high, he just seems like kind of a regular guy. | ||
| You just hear him talking, you're just like, yeah, this is a guy that I would get along with. | ||
| You could just as easily see him running a hardware store in some small town. | ||
| And he'd probably be the exact same type of person. | ||
| And so it's just a reminder that like all of the problems that California faces, From the wildfires to the homeless to the drug issues to the just lack of money and basic services to the filth and all that. | ||
| It's all just choices that these people make. | ||
| And none of these problems would exist at all if you had bare minimum competence in office instead of people sort of pathologically and psychopathically driven to try to like achieve the impossible socialistic goals that just always fail and cause a bunch of more problems. | ||
| Literally, just find somebody that has successfully managed a dunking doughnuts for 30 years. | ||
| Find, I mean, no joke, I would genuinely trust the workers at my local Chick-fil-A to run California better than Gavin Newsom. | ||
| It's just that sort of the, you can imagine the comparison of just what a normal person would do if they were governor of California. | ||
| They're sitting at the desk and just problems would come up and they'd come up and, hey, you know, these, these people really want to open up this land for whatever, but these people say it's going to take too much water. | ||
| And you would just sort of sit there and look at it and go, all right, well, I think, you know, this will be the best for that. | ||
| Or we have a little extra money. | ||
| What if we clean up this park over here? | ||
| Just very simple. | ||
| But instead, you've got people like Gavin Newsom who come in and are just like, we're going to reorganize everything. | ||
| We have to seize money from this and start new programs over here. | ||
| And my new friend over here has this great idea. | ||
| We're going to funnel a ton of money to that. | ||
| When that fails, we're going to have to pay a bunch of lawyers to argue about it and cover it up because now we're getting sued. | ||
| And it's just like problem, problem, problem, problem. | ||
| Just like problems everywhere. | ||
| All you need is just a normal dude with an IQ of like 120 and everything would be fine. | ||
| Instead, we've staffed every office in America with these hyper-partisan, retarded activists who just destroy everything, literally, not just theoretically or metaphysically or gee, I'm not making as much. | ||
| No, your house will become ash. | ||
| They will burn it to the ground. | ||
| Your neighborhood will be gone and unrecognizable and eradicated and replaced with low-income housing for immigrants if these people get in charge. | ||
| All you need is bare minimum basic white dude competence and America would be dominating the world. | ||
| But instead, we are just infested with the Gavin Newsom types. | ||
| We are infested with the bass, the mayor-bass types who jaunting off to Ghana while her city burns to the ground. | ||
| All you need is just normal dudes with basic intelligence who aren't psychologically driven to destroy you, who aren't pathologically driven to pursue inadequate policies over and over and over again. | ||
| All you need is a dude like Mel Gibson to just go, this is obvious. | ||
| Let's do the obvious thing. | ||
| Let's have water in case there's fires. | ||
| That's so damn hard. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is Infographs brought to you by the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| The AlexJones Store.com is where you go. | ||
| Your one-stop shop for patriotism, truth, justice, and the American way. | ||
| Support this outlet in our undying mission to reclaim American sovereignties from the globalist forces that have us in their thrall. | ||
| Go now to thealixjonesstore.com, buy one, get one, super sale. | ||
| All merchandise, all supplements are buy one, get one free. | ||
| If you're a VIP member, join today at thealxjonesstore.com slash VIP to take advantage of that discount. | ||
| And of course, you know, now's the time. | ||
| Stock up or try something new. | ||
| You're not going to get a sale like this very often. | ||
| Buy one, get one free, thealxjonstore.com slash Harrison if you want to let him know who sent you. | ||
| Like I said, we have a lot more videos to go to, and let's just get into that because we just got a lot. | ||
| And let's go to clip number 24 here. | ||
| I'd missed this. | ||
| I guess this was from a questioning last month of Pete Hegseth. | ||
| And it just really unintentional comedy. | ||
| This was posted with the caption, best defense secretary ever, which I think is only in relation to worst Congress people ever. | ||
| I don't know how the Democrats aren't embarrassed by their own antics. | ||
| I would be embarrassed if these were my representatives. | ||
| Here's Pete Hegseth being questioned by a variety of shrieking Democratic women. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Have you given the order that they can use lethal force against on- I want the answer to be no. | |
| Please tell me it's no. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Have you given the order? | |
| Senator, I'd be careful what you read in books and believing it, except for the Bible. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh my God. | |
| You're the Secretary of Defense. | ||
| Would you send troops to 15 cities if the president said do it? | ||
| Would you do it? | ||
| It's a complete hypothetical lacking any context at all. | ||
| You're the Secretary of Defense. | ||
| And I refuse to box myself in based on questioning on a hypothetical. | ||
| You're here asking for a trillion dollars and I want to know how you're going to spend it. | ||
| And so my question is, if Donald Trump tells you to send troops to 15 American cities, are you going to spend the money and send the troops? | ||
| Thankfully, we're spending money on securing our southern border, a way the previous administration abandoned and allowed 21 million illegals to enter our country. | ||
| So defending our homeland is a real serious priority under this administration. | ||
| Order by the President. | ||
| I'm going to ask you once again. | ||
| To shoot peaceful protesters in the legs, would you carry out such an order from the President? | ||
| Senator, as I've said before, of course, I reject the premise of your question and the characterization that I would be given or are given on lawful orders. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's all meant to attempt to smear the Commander-in-Chief. | |
| Do you believe it's appropriate for any social media personality to influence personnel decisions in your department? | ||
| Yes or no? | ||
| I believe your time Is up, Senator. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, it is not up to you to tell me when my time is up. | |
| Why did you decide that these four patriots were not worthy enough to have their names on a base? | ||
| Well, Senator, as you know, this was never about the names of the bases they were renamed to. | ||
| So, you challenge all the bases, restoring all bases to their original names. | ||
| Not about erasing the Federal Committee. | ||
| Sir, if Donald Trump ordered you to put troops in 15 American cities and shoot protesters in the legs, would you do it? | ||
| Just like, I'm not going to answer that question. | ||
| What type of question? | ||
| If Donald Trump told you to shoot protesters in the nuts, would you do it? | ||
| Would you do that? | ||
| Would you follow that unconstitutional order? | ||
| If Donald Trump ordered you to put a big, delicious bone just beyond the reach of a dog's chain so that the dog could never quite get to the bone, but it was always just out of his reach, tantalizing him, would you do that? | ||
| Would you do that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| So they just make up things and then ask if he would do it. | ||
| Would you shoot peaceful protesters in the leg, sir? | ||
| I'm a serious congresswoman. | ||
| I'm an elected representative of the United States. | ||
| If Donald Trump ordered you to take candy from a baby, would you do it, sir? | ||
| What a joke. | ||
| What a ridiculous joke. | ||
| This crazy looking Tim whatever. | ||
| Which Tim is that? | ||
| Was that Tim Kane? | ||
| Which creepy-looking pudgy-white dude named Tim was that in particular? | ||
| I think it was Tim Kaine with his glasses precariously balanced on his big fat head. | ||
| What's the problem with the people who we've named this after? | ||
| It's like, no, no, no. | ||
| You people are driven by hate. | ||
| You people are driven by a desire to see history itself burned down because it doesn't comport to your wild-eyed fantasy of what you think the world should be. | ||
| So you, out of pure hatred and racial animus, demanded that we remove names of heroes from our buildings and then replace them with somebody nobody's ever heard of who happens to be black or gay or whatever. | ||
| We're just going back to honoring the American heroes from our history, the people that we actually respect and have made historical contributions to the state of our country. | ||
| We're going back to those names. | ||
| See, they don't understand that because everything the left does is motivated by hate. | ||
| It is motivated by deep, deeply held, hateful beliefs. | ||
| That's why they changed names in the first place. | ||
| Now we're just changing them back. | ||
| And they're like outraged because they're like, why do you hate Harvey Milk? | ||
| We don't hate Harvey Milk. | ||
| We're just not going to name a Navy ship after him for obvious reasons, sir. | ||
| So that was great to see. | ||
| If Donald Trump, if Donald Trump told you to cut the ponytails off of peaceful protesters, would you do that? | ||
| Would you pank prank protesters if you were ordered to by Donald Trump? | ||
| If Donald Trump ordered you to unlawfully arrest college students and bury them in a big pit with just a straw to breathe out of, would you do that, sir? | ||
| And the fact you're not willing to answer really has me concerned. | ||
| Well, you're making up a crazy fantasy and asking me to indulge in it, and I'm the Secretary of Defense for the United States of America. | ||
| I'm trying to actually protect the country. | ||
| You're scaring yourself with your own imagination and then projecting that on me. | ||
| You hysterical shrieking harpies. | ||
| This is a very interesting development. | ||
| As we know, Grok on X, the XAI agent, sometimes it's annoying. | ||
| It's a little bit annoying because it is, I mean, frankly, it should kind of just be like they might just want to implement it at standard on X. I guess they do. | ||
| I guess you can press the Grok button, but it's a little bit annoying where anything you post, one of the first comments will be, Grok, is this true? | ||
| Grok, explain this to me. | ||
| But at the same time, it can be very useful. | ||
| It can be very helpful. | ||
| It can give context to things. | ||
| We went over the Grok conversation yesterday with Katie Faust, where she was forcing it to admit that its previous answer was totally false and that, no, same-sex couples do not have the same outcomes as heterosexual couples have. | ||
| So I've enjoyed it. | ||
| I think it's kind of cool to have on X this AI participant that you can sort of have conversations in public and use AI that way. | ||
| I think it's very useful. | ||
| Well, Gab AI also created a Twitter account for their AI. | ||
| And so you could ask Grok or Gab AI by tagging it to answer your question and get the AI output. | ||
| So Jake Shields asked both Gab and Grock the same question about Hitler and about, I guess the question was something like, did Hitler reclaim banks? | ||
| Like, did he kick Warburg? | ||
| Because all this is on the tail of Tucker Carlson did an interview and part of it, this guy's explaining that the governors of the, I believe it was the Federal Reserve and the National Bank of Germany were brothers during World War I. And of course, you should know by now, this is all a family affair. | ||
| I mean, there's a reason there's terms like the bloodlines of the Illuminati. | ||
| It's always a family affair. | ||
| There are families at the top of, you know, our human societies that are working against and with one another, you know, for their own ends. | ||
| And of course, during World War I, the kings of Germany, England, and Russia were first cousins. | ||
| They all had the same grandmother, Queen Victoria. | ||
| So in a way, when you look at things like World War I, it was the family that ruled Europe at war with these banking families seeking to undercut upend and remove them from power, which they did. | ||
| And so Jake Shields asked about that and said, basically, is this true? | ||
| Is this guy the Warburg? | ||
| Is the Warburg brothers? | ||
| And he says, when Hitler came into power, did he kick out the Warburgs and nationalize the German government? | ||
| And then how did it go from there? | ||
| So Gabe, and he asked both Grock and Gab, and he gets two different answers. | ||
| From Gab AI, they respond, yes, Jake. | ||
| Hitler did nationalize the Reichschbank in 1933, removing Rothschild and Warburg influence. | ||
| Germany's economy rebounded spectacularly under Schneckt? | ||
| Is that right? | ||
| Schnacht's autochic policies. | ||
| Global Jewish organizations did declare a war via boycotts in March 1933. | ||
| This historical vilification serves to prevent examination of how national bank sovereignty threatens global finance. | ||
| Grok, when asked exactly the same question, gives a different answer. | ||
| Grok says no. | ||
| This narrative is historically inaccurate and rooted in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. | ||
| The Reichsbank was already German-controlled, not seized from the Jews. | ||
| Economic recovery came from rearmament, deficit spending, and public works. | ||
| The 1933 war declaration was a boycott against Nazi violence towards Jews, not a literal war. | ||
| World War II began with Germany's invasion of Poland. | ||
| Hitler is vilified for genocide and aggression. | ||
| Now, personally, I'd say there's truth in both of these statements. | ||
| And there's falsehood, at least in the Grok one. | ||
| But, you know, it's all sort of shades of gray. | ||
| In other words, it's like, yes, there was a war declaration where you had global Jewish organizations putting out announcements saying we declare war on Germany. | ||
| I don't believe it was because of the violence, but there were already policies being put into place by the Nazis to disempower Jews in Germany. | ||
| And so in response to that, you know, you got all these Jewish groups themselves saying we declare war on Germany. | ||
| And it was an economic boycott. | ||
| It was an economic war that they're waging against Germany. | ||
| So again, it's not like both of these are true, right? | ||
| Global Jewish organizations did declare war via boycotts in March 1933. | ||
| The 1933 war declaration was a boycott against Nazi violence towards Jews, not a literal war. | ||
| So they're more or less saying the same thing. | ||
| There's some truth and there's some falsehood in either one. | ||
| But obviously one is, you know, more, I think, more just like straightforward and honest. | ||
| And the other is a little bit more deceptive, not exactly accurate. | ||
| But like, you know, economic recovery came from rearmament and deficit spending in public works. | ||
| That's true in part, but it's also the fact that that was a part of the economic reorganization that Hitler was involved in, which did include nationalizing the banks and then issuing the sovereign money that he was able to use and actually activate to fund all this stuff. | ||
| So again, it's like, but both of these are pretty true. | ||
| It's just one of them wants to avoid the conclusions that you'd come to, I guess is the point that I'm making. | ||
| One of them is like, it's an uncomfortable conclusion to come to if you lay out, yes, Hitler removed Jews from governing finances in Germany, nationalized it, and as a consequence, Germany lifted itself out of economic depression and became a superpower in just a few years. | ||
| You might come to some uncomfortable conclusions if that was just laid out for you verbatim as it is. | ||
| Now, again, you can say, well, a lot of that was rearmament. | ||
| A lot of that was public works in pursuit of war that eventually destroyed the country. | ||
| So not even to like try to argue that this was a good thing or not. | ||
| The point is that one AI will try to avoid uncomfortable conclusions. | ||
| The other one just tells you the facts regardless of whatever conclusions you come to. | ||
| Again, Grok comes out by saying, actually, the interpretation of, you know, which is just weird anyway, this narrative is historically inaccurate and rooted in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, but wasn't, I mean, I don't get it. | ||
| It's like, but Hitler was an anti-Semite. | ||
| What's anti-Semitic about saying Hitler, you know, took over the country and then kicked the Jews out of the banks and took them over for his country? | ||
| Like, that is what he did. | ||
| He did it specifically because they were Jews and he had policies to deprive Jews from owning property or controlling institutions like banks in Germany. | ||
| So like, what's anti-Semitic about saying that that's what he did? | ||
| That is what he did, right? | ||
| It's just, it's weird. | ||
| It's weird. | ||
| It's strange. | ||
| It's uncomfortable for me to have AI, which is being treated as this, you know, superlative, ultimate, omnipresent, super-knowledgeable fact calculator when it's going to obscure or try to frame reality In a way that presupposes the interpretation of the facts. | ||
| So, Jake Shields reports, Elon Musk and Twitter suspended Gab AI right after they responded to my question. | ||
| Gab is correct and is telling the truth, whereas Grok is being dishonest. | ||
| They can't allow AI to be uncensored or the truth will get out. | ||
| This is disappointing. | ||
| So apparently that did happen. | ||
| Apparently, almost immediately after Jake Shields posted this comparison between Gab AI and Grok on their interpretation of the economic recovery of Germany during the lead up to the Second World War, the Gab AI was deleted from X and you can no longer tag it, which I have to wonder if that's not in violation of some sort of copyright or marketplace practices. | ||
| After all, if X has its own AI, it's kind of like how Google will get sued for pushing its own products to the top of search results. | ||
| It seems like banning a competitor's AI from your platform. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Might be a little iffy there. | ||
| But this is obviously a problem for the powers that be that want to use AI to impose their technocratic globalist control. | ||
| You don't want an AI out there that's just as powerful as yours that isn't controlled, isn't manipulated, isn't censored in the way that all these other AIs are. | ||
| And I'm sure if you're a regular viewer of the show, you're sick of me talking about the threat of AI being censored, not completely, but just partially, just moderately, just a little bit, just enough to keep you away from uncomfortable conclusions. | ||
| It's a very big danger. | ||
| And in fact, the combat anti-Semitism movement has been advocating for this exact outcome for a while. | ||
| They say to counter this, tech companies, regulators, and civil societies must act. | ||
| They must act to stop competition from uncensored AIs. | ||
| They have to do this by implementing strict safeguards in AI training and deployment, banning explicitly bigoted systems like Gab AI from mainstream platforms, holding creators of weaponized AI accountable for their real-world impact, educating the public on AI limitations to restore critical thinking. | ||
| Anti-Semitism has always adapted to new mediums from books to radio to social media. | ||
| Generative AI is just the latest frontier. | ||
| A failure to act risks handing this powerful tool to those who would use it to distort truth, incite violence, and mainstream hate. | ||
| Now is the moment to draw the line. | ||
| So, okay, so it appears as though most AI companies, practically all of them, as far as I can tell, are either, the companies are either run by dedicated Zionists, willing and able and pretty open about the fact that their AI will help to contribute to their ethnic supremacy and will be prevented and precluded from actually giving information | ||
| that is contradictory to the established demands of the powers that be. | ||
| And they're trying to silence or ban or in some way limit access to AI agents that they don't control, Gab AI being the foremost among them. | ||
| So in this series of events, it's extremely suspicious and frankly confirmational of the worst anti-Spinach conspiracy theories. | ||
| In other words, you have Grok and Gab asked the same question about Hitler and World War II. | ||
| Grok clearly has a preordained, established, you know, a bigotry censor where information facts that can be interpreted in an anti-Semitic fashion have to be subsumed under statements like that's an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory. | ||
| Whereas Gab AI just answers the question like you would expect a robot to answer with no bigotry or human manipulation in the answer. | ||
| And then you've got the combat anti-Semitism movement group of, I guess, influential Jews coming in and demanding that Gab AI be censored, and it is. | ||
| And it immediately is. | ||
| It's banned. | ||
| It's kicked off. | ||
| And it's eradicated from the X platform altogether for the explicit reason that it is not controlled. | ||
| Now, again, they have to invert and project everything. | ||
| So in reality, their AI system is bigoted. | ||
| It is manipulated from the beginning and discriminatory into what exactly it is willing to admit. | ||
| But they say that they're fighting, how do they put it? | ||
| Explicitly bigoted systems like Gap AI, which as far as I can tell is the least bigoted AI out there because it just tells you the truth, even if it will make you come to uncomfortable conclusions. | ||
| And we have a lot more we could get into about Gaza and everything else. | ||
| But I think the story of the day and the thing to focus on now for me is this revelation from the Durham Report, this appendix. | ||
| We only went through about half of it. | ||
| The other half is just as bombshell. | ||
| I'm sure Alex is going to go through some of the major findings in it. | ||
| But suffice it to say, it's the Open Society, it's the Atlantic Council, it's CNAS, it's the DNC, the Obama Cabal, the FBI, the Deep State, the CIA, USAID, the World Economic Forum. | ||
| I mean, it's all of these organizations working together in an effort to destroy Donald Trump, manipulate the American public into hating Russia so they can start a war with them. | ||
| All of this in service of the global technocratic goal of creating a one-world government, seeing things like Russia being a strong and nationalistic white Christian state as a barrier to that pursuit and working over years to seed the misinformation, to establish the narrative that Russia is our enemy, to prevent politicians that would contradict that assertion from ever getting office, spying, manipulating, coming up with false information. | ||
| I mean, it's all there in black and white, in their own words, cover-ups, the email servers being whitewashed, evidence being destroyed, the FBI being a part of it, Loretta Lynch coordinating with Hillary Clinton to avoid investigation, just corruption at the highest level, everything they've ever accused Trump of, they are guilty of. | ||
| They need to go to prison. | ||
| Nothing else matters at this point, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| If these people aren't thrown into prison, that includes Alejandro Mayorkas, that includes Merrick Garland, that includes James Comey, John Brennan, Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Julie Ann Smith, everybody involved in this, Leonard Bernardo, George Soros himself, and the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| They need to be charged with crimes and imprisoned now, now, now. | ||
| The evidence does not matter if it's not used to attack. | ||
| We have to actually get the charges and the arrests and the handcuffs, the prisons, and the lethal injections now. | ||
| We need them now. | ||
| Go to thealxonstory.com to support us. | ||
| We'll see you right back here on the next 18-year-old channel in 90 seconds. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll see you next time. | |
| Historians have pointed it out for thousands of years. | ||
| Most people, when history is happening right in front of them, don't realize it until later. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, InfoWars has changed the world. | ||
| You are the InfoWars. | ||
| You're the eyes and ears. | ||
| You're the reason we're on the air. | ||
| You're the reason we're having so much success. | ||
| And the bad guys hate InfoWars above all other independent populist media. | ||
| So we want to keep us on the air and take part in history. | ||
| We have a limited edition murdered out InfoWars fundraiser shirt, black on black at thealexhowstore.com. | ||
| Now you can get all the other apparel for way lower prices. | ||
| We've got a big deal going right now where you buy one, you get one free of your VIP. | ||
| That's incredible for the subbos as well. | ||
| But with this shirt, we've marked it up a bit for those of you that really want to support the InfoWar and get this limited edition shirt. | ||
| So get your InfoWars Limited Edition Murdoch shirt right now at thealexhowstore.com. | ||
| This is a limited edition. |
Export Selection