Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
It's very compelling because it brings us over into a parallel portal technology structure, which isn't on the record. | ||
It isn't something that people talk about. | ||
Even when we talk about warp drives, even when we talk about... | ||
Sure, always what we're told something is for is never its main function. | ||
But just look right here. | ||
Here's the gravity you want to get. | ||
So they've already got the biggest superconductive ladder, they say, there. | ||
But now the one they want to build is just gigantic. | ||
It is. | ||
And what's interesting is, again, scientists have objected to the pull, what they call the pull on the ionosphere when CERN is turned on. | ||
And just look at the size of that secondary one and the construction that's going on deep, deep underground, budgeted billions of dollars every year. | ||
And when you look at the background of CERN, it literally and legitimately raises a number of questions about where that money is going and what they're doing with it. | ||
If you look at CERN, it's quite interesting because CERN put out a series of visuals very much like the Denver Airport in something called the CERN Tarot Deck. | ||
And CERN operates completely underground. | ||
You know, I've talked to scientists and everything else. | ||
None of CERN has to be underground. | ||
So this suggests something very, very unusual going on with CERN. | ||
They are now, just the one that they have is a 17-mile radius that goes down hundreds and hundreds of feet. | ||
But what's interesting is the one that they're planning, and I did put a shot of this up on my X feed. | ||
I'll try to see which one of this that is for you. | ||
But it's quite interesting because the one that they're planning is so much bigger than the one that's there. | ||
And we already know what the unusual- We have it. | ||
I'll have the crew do an overhead shot, overhead shot, and I'll show him what he's talking about. | ||
Keep going. | ||
Yeah, that's one of those interesting things for me because when you look at what's going on with CERN, We're looking at something which is an unexplained project, and its typical explanation we understand very, very well. | ||
So it's got this, we're going to find the Higgs boson and all the rest of it. | ||
But CERN is very compelling because it brings us over into a parallel portal technology structure, which isn't on the record, isn't something that people talk about. | ||
Even when we talk about warp drives, even when we talk about- Sure, always what we're told something is for is never its main function, but just- Look right here. | ||
Here's the gravity you want to get. | ||
So they've already got the biggest superconductor ladder, they say, there. | ||
But now the one they want to build is just gigantic. | ||
It is. | ||
And what's interesting is, again, scientists have objected to the pole, what they call the pole, on the ionosphere when CERN is turned on. | ||
And just look at the size of that secondary one and the construction that's going on deep, deep underground. | ||
Budgeted billions of dollars every year. | ||
And when you look at the background of CERN, it literally and legitimately raises a number of questions about where that money is going and what they're doing with it. | ||
They're also the number one user of the internet, for example. | ||
Well, notice how they're interconnected, too. | ||
You do a lot of experiments there, but there's a lot they said they wouldn't do, like setting two up against each other, running them together. | ||
Look how they connect one with the other. | ||
That's the slam particles from two directions or even more at each other. | ||
Ah, boy, I think... | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
We're showing you some of the footage that CERN puts out, and there's also in movies, but... | ||
When they opened it, they did all these weird pagan satanic rituals, and it's like skull and bones type stuff out there at night. | ||
A lot of theoretical physicists and quantum mechanics experts have said that things are imminently dangerous, and strange lids, black holes. | ||
Yes, they can create those. | ||
Yes, those have been done in underground bases that they admit exist. | ||
China has created artificial suns on the surface. | ||
They said that's even more dangerous and launched them publicly. | ||
But if you tell people at a cocktail party, they go, hey, that's Star Trek. | ||
No, we're in the future. | ||
It's just not evenly distributed. | ||
And obviously, real power by elites would be to keep this from people. | ||
So we reverse engineered 30 years ago the geoengineering, the big widespread stuff. | ||
They always divert to little local boutique groups making more snow for a ski resort or making it rain for the farmers. | ||
And then you've got 30-something states passing laws or on the verge of passing laws to ban geoengineering. | ||
Florida just did it. | ||
So there is a curiosity acceleration and a discovery of this and a decompartmentalization happening at every level. | ||
And again, there are definitely different competing factions and technological groups. | ||
We have to look at what other governments have. | ||
China hides a lot. | ||
Russia, on record, has a larger budget. | ||
unidentified
|
It's Thursday, May 8th, in the year of our Lord, 2025. | |
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
I think it's time to blow this scene. | ||
Get everybody in the stuff together. | ||
Okay, three, two, one, it's jammed. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Coming to you live this Thursday morning. | ||
We got a lot of political news to talk about. | ||
Lots of videos to show you. | ||
Of course, as always, we are going to be breaking down some successes of Donald Trump. | ||
And yes, figuring out why it is. | ||
Why is it, do you think, some of the biggest globalist industrial leaders in the world are all stepping down at the same time? | ||
Bill Gates is now talking about winding down his foundation. | ||
Warren Buffett just stepped away from Berkshire Hathaway. | ||
Got Klaus Schwab stepping away from the World Economic Forum. | ||
And I'm sure there are some others that I'm just not thinking of right now. | ||
The question is why. | ||
The question is why. | ||
Maybe we need to revisit the lockstep document. | ||
Maybe it's time that we go back to the lockstep document and look at the role of Philanthropic foundations in our current phase, which I think would be hack attack. | ||
I think we're in the hack attack phase right now. | ||
But I'm seeing a lot of suspicious activity from the philanthropy-type peoples out there. | ||
So we'll ask that question, see if we can get to some answers. | ||
We'll be talking about Casey Means as well, the new... | ||
Nominee for Surgeon General, I believe. | ||
This causing quite a bit of division, quite a big rift in the Magamaha movement. | ||
Some very strong words from the likes of Nicole Shanahan, the former running mate of RFK Jr. | ||
Really saying she's been betrayed. | ||
There's a lot of controversy going on around that pick, which we can lay at the feet, I think, of Laura Loomer, I guess. | ||
We'll get into all of it. | ||
And more. | ||
begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch. | ||
unidentified
|
Phone rings. | |
All right, here it is, folks. | ||
Your Daily Dispatch for Thursday, the 8th of May, 2025. | ||
U.S.-UK trade deal announcement expected. | ||
The U.S. and Britain are expected to announce a trade deal on Thursday that will lower the burden of President Trump's sweeping tariffs, delivering a political victory for U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer that Trump can also use to validate his turbulent approach to the international economy. | ||
Trump posted on his Truth Social platform that the agreement will be full and comprehensive. | ||
No details were immediately available, and it's more likely that the deal will be limited to providing tariff relief to certain sectors like car manufacturing. | ||
And the president is expected to speak from the Oval Office at 10 a.m. today. | ||
That's Eastern Daylight Time. | ||
That'll be 9 o 'clock here, so we will definitely be tuning into that. | ||
Now, whether this is just the announcement about the trade deal with the UK or whether this has to do with the teasing that we are showing you Trump was doing yesterday with the announcement of something gigantic and earth-shaking and very good, and I'm not giving you any details. | ||
I'm not exactly sure what this announcement is about, but we will be keeping our eye on it and we'll bring you it live when it happens. | ||
Long-awaited news story. | ||
OMG reveals video with top advisor claiming Prince Andrew, quote, was effing underage girls. | ||
The latest undercover video from O 'Keefe Media Group featured British Royal Family Advisor John Bryan claiming that Prince Andrew was doing that and had close ties to an infamous financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
People are maybe a little bit disappointed in this revelation. | ||
Considering that this has been a fairly widely known reality for a very long time, James O 'Keefe explained that two weeks after Prince Andrew's interview with the BBC, in which he denied knowing Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre, Brian said he was brought to Andrew's private residence to provide crisis management. | ||
Brian said at the time that Prince Andrew was distressed and struggling to focus. | ||
Brian reportedly constructed a five-page PR strategy for Prince Andrew, advising that he show empathy for Epstein's victims publicly. | ||
In a 2022 interview, Brian said he believed Prince Andrew was innocent. | ||
Brian said that Prince Andrew had lied to him, and when asked about what he was lied about, Brian responded, I knew he, Prince Andrew, saw him, Jeffrey Epstein, but he lied to me that he was such a close friend. | ||
I was so pissed. | ||
I was so pissed, you guys. | ||
He was as pissed as Jake Tapper was when he found out that Joe Biden wasn't mentally competent. | ||
Like, I can't believe it! | ||
I can't believe this obvious thing is true. | ||
What? | ||
The thing that I've been denying despite having first-hand knowledge of? | ||
What? | ||
No way. | ||
Yeah, not exactly a big surprise. | ||
And I'll just say, in defense of James O 'Keefe, the most successful program the royal family has ever run, and they've been running it quietly for the last 80 years or so, is to dissolve into the background in terms of optics while maintaining every power and authority they've ever had. | ||
The royal family in the UK, and they'll say, oh, they're just a tourist trap. | ||
They don't have any real power. | ||
Like, really, when did that happen? | ||
When did that happen? | ||
When did the queen or the king give up their power? | ||
When do they no longer have all of the authorities that they did 80 years ago? | ||
Oh, never? | ||
Oh, they still do? | ||
Oh, they're still incredibly powerful? | ||
They just work in the shadows? | ||
Oh, okay. | ||
Okay, got it. | ||
unidentified
|
So... | |
You know, people saying James O 'Keefe is being overly dramatic. | ||
Yeah, the royal family kills people. | ||
Ask Princess Diana. | ||
Alright, they're still extremely powerful, extremely influential, and have things like diplomatic immunity in the U.S. where they can get away with a hell of a lot of stuff in this country. | ||
Including engaging in sex trafficking, extortion, blackmail, political corruption rings. | ||
So there you go. | ||
That's the story. | ||
Meanwhile, 3,200 woke Biden grants purged by Trump administration. | ||
President Donald Trump's Department of Transportation has purged 3,200 grants left by former President Joe Biden of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and social justice initiatives. | ||
The Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced on Tuesday that the Trump administration has approved an additional 180 infrastructure grants totaling $3.2 billion. | ||
The department noted that the 180 infrastructure grants are part of an unprecedented backlog of over 3,200 projects that the Biden-Harris administration announced but did not accomplish. | ||
The Trump administration inherited a record number of 3,200 unobligated grants that had been announced by the previous administration but never obligated. | ||
The Transportation Department said this unprecedented backlog of unobligated grants delayed critical investments in communities across the country. | ||
Under Secretary Duffy's direction, the department is working diligently to accelerate the distribution of these long-overdue funds and address core infrastructure projects. | ||
According to the Transportation Department, 329 grants, or approximately 10 percent, of the unfinished grants left behind by Biden and former Transportation Department Secretary Pete Buttigieg have been approved since Trump's inauguration in January. | ||
I'm a little bit confused here. | ||
I'm a little bit confused by this story. | ||
I thought this was more cut and dry. | ||
What is it saying? | ||
I'm very confused. | ||
It says they purged 3,200 grants left by former president of diversity, equity, and inclusion. | ||
Oh, okay. | ||
So they took these 3,200 grants and purged them of diversity, equity, and inclusion. | ||
I was confused. | ||
When you first read it, it sounds like they purged 300 and... | ||
Or 3,200 grants. | ||
The grants are going forward. | ||
They're actually building infrastructure instead of claiming that they're building infrastructure when in fact they're just running a giant scam as always. | ||
Yeah, we'll hear from Bumble and Joe a little bit later in the show. | ||
Stay tuned for that. | ||
Stay tuned for that glimpse of the future that could have been The world that we could live in today with that man as president. | ||
Yeah, we'll show you. | ||
We'll get to that for sure. | ||
Judge temporarily blocks Trump's administration new transit and homeless grant conditions. | ||
A federal judge on Wednesday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from imposing new conditions on hundreds of millions of dollars worth of mass transit grants for Seattle area or homeless service grants for Boston. | ||
New York, San Francisco, and other local governments. | ||
The new conditions were designed to further President Donald Trump's efforts to eliminate diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, coerce local officials into assisting with the administration's mass deportation efforts, and cut off information about lawful abortions, according to the lawsuit filed last week by eight cities and counties. | ||
The administration argued that senior U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein in Seattle did not have jurisdiction over the lawsuit because it was essentially a contract dispute that should have been brought in the court of federal claims, an argument the judge rejected. | ||
Rothstein wrote that the local governments had shown they were likely to win the case because the conditions being imposed on the grants had not been approved by Congress, were not closely related to the purposes of the grants, and would not make the administration of the grants more efficient. | ||
Yeah, I think just, um... | ||
Cancel the grants. | ||
Maybe just cancel the grants then. | ||
There you go. | ||
Now you don't have to choose. | ||
Now you're no longer stuck between choosing to not waste our money on ridiculous anti-white deconstructionist communistic programs or receiving the money. | ||
They can just not receive the money. | ||
I think we'll all be better off, actually. | ||
Actually, we'll all be even better off if we just don't even give them the chance to try to make their grants, to try to hide their activities in the grants. | ||
That's all that means to them. | ||
Remember, we're not dealing with good people. | ||
We're not dealing with decent, honest, respectable people that you can give the benefit of the doubt. | ||
We're dealing with psychotic weasel people, okay? | ||
So, always keep that in mind. | ||
Always remember, the people we're dealing with are better As deceptive little weasels in human costumes, okay? | ||
Just always, always, always keep that in mind. | ||
We're going to talk about that a little bit later too. | ||
Because we need to get to the bottom of a few things. | ||
We need to find some similarities, let's just say. | ||
Connecting all of these stories, and one of the main ones is not just a lack of what you could call honor, but an inability to even conceive of honor as a concept. | ||
I think we're dealing with that in ways that we haven't noticed as much as we should. | ||
So again, what I mean is that when you tell these people, You're not allowed to discriminate against white people or men. | ||
You're not allowed to take money on the basis of building homes for the homeless and instead spend it on indoctrinating the homeless into hating white people or whatever ridiculous nonsense I'm sure they're up to. | ||
When you tell them they can't do that, all they hear is better rename the DEI program, better keep doing what we were doing, what they told us to stop. | ||
And just name it something else, call it something different. | ||
There's not even a remote possibility that they genuinely take in and accept the new political reality and then work to conform themselves within it. | ||
They're just going to break the law. | ||
That's all they do is just break the law. | ||
So we'll get back to that whole concept later. | ||
Finally, we have this Democrat judge indicted in ballot harvesting scheme. | ||
Public officials arrested. | ||
Election officials who think they can cheat and stay in power will be held accountable. | ||
No one is above the law, says Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. | ||
The Texas Attorney General's office indicted a Democrat county judge and arrested several public officials, accusing them of scamming voters by engaging in an illegal vote ballot harvesting scheme. | ||
A former Frio County Elections Administrator, a Frio County vote harvester, to Persol... | ||
City Council members, a Persall school board member, were all arrested last week on charges of tampering with or fabricating physical evidence and vote harvesting with Frio County Judge Rochelle Camacho, also facing three counts of vote harvesting while her processing is postponed for a later date. | ||
Quote, the people of Texas deserve fair and honest elections, not backroom deals and political insiders rigging the system, reads a statement from Texas AG Ken Paxton. | ||
The AG's office explained the arrest stemmed from cooperation with Frio County District Attorney Audrey Lewis in a probe by its Criminal Investigation Division, which looks into, quote, credible allegations of vote harvesting. | ||
So very, very big deal. | ||
And of course, replicate the program uncovered here a couple hundred times throughout the United States. | ||
And you've stolen yourself an election, folks. | ||
That is, of course, your daily dispatch. | ||
Brought to you by TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
Go to TheAlexJonesStore.com today to get your optimal human. | ||
I'm back on the optimal human. | ||
I'm back on it. | ||
You would think, one might suspect that doing a morning show every single day of the week, that I would have a rather robust routine that I adhere to strictly. | ||
You could not be farther from the truth. | ||
I struggle with that. | ||
And so sometimes what happens is if I don't, I'll just forget about things. | ||
I forget that I take vitamins for like a week. | ||
And I find my vitamin K. I'm like, oh yeah, I'm supposed to do that every day. | ||
I'm not great at sticking to a routine, but one thing I do like to do is have just one sort of touchstone. | ||
Like, alright, every morning at this time, optimal human. | ||
If I can just do that, if I can just check one thing off of a checklist, First thing in the morning, it will be well on my way to achieving something that day. | ||
So I'm back on the Optimal Human. | ||
I'd forgotten to do it for a while, but now I'm back on it. | ||
And I'm telling you, once you're back on, you're like, why did I stop? | ||
Why was I not doing this every day? | ||
It's really powerful stuff. | ||
It's just incredible vitamins, minerals. | ||
It's a whole food, nutritional supplement. | ||
You mix it in the water and it tastes great. | ||
It tastes like a green tea. | ||
I like to put a little lemon in it as well. | ||
And it's just the easiest possible way. | ||
Add a scoop to your water or your smoothie or any beverage, and you're just set all day for basically all the nutrients you could ever possibly need. | ||
It's really incredible and powerful stuff. | ||
You can order it now at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
You can get the starter pack. | ||
You can sign up for the scheduled deliveries. | ||
That way, even if we run out, which we did run out last time we had it in stock. | ||
It did sell out, but everybody who signed up for regular deliveries guaranteed that they got their product. | ||
And you can do that without being a VIP member, right? | ||
But being a VIP member gives you additional benefits across the store. | ||
TheAlexJonesStore.com Go there today. | ||
Please? | ||
Please and thank you. | ||
Alright, we got a lot to talk about today. | ||
We got a lot of videos to show you. | ||
Kanye West came out with this new song and it's not great. | ||
It's not a very good song, I hate to tell you. | ||
I hate to break this to you. | ||
This morning or late last night, Ye's song Hail Hitler came out. | ||
And it is ironically a powerful piece of propaganda. | ||
That Hitler himself might have used to warn the world of the consequences of him losing the war. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I don't know what that means. | ||
I don't think Hitler would have liked it, is what I'm trying to say. | ||
I don't think this would have been right up there with, you know, Wagner for Hitler to have a guy like Ye make a song about... | ||
I don't know. | ||
Molesting his cousin and talking about it on X. I don't know. | ||
People are celebrating this. | ||
It's not a good song. | ||
It really is just not a good song. | ||
Maybe I got a bad version of it or something. | ||
But I swear, for the second half of the song, it sounds like it's got... | ||
It sounds like the song was made in GarageBand, to be honest with you. | ||
And it sounds like they forgot to delete a... | ||
Offbeat drum track. | ||
It's just not a good song. | ||
It's just not a good song. | ||
He just talks about... | ||
He's like, oh, you call me a cuck? | ||
Because I like to see my wife have sex with other men? | ||
Yep. | ||
Yep, that's the definition for sure, yeah. | ||
Yeah, no. | ||
I think I read about that in Mein Kampf, actually. | ||
Pretty sure. | ||
So whatever. | ||
We don't have to go to it or anything, but we're showing clips of the video there. | ||
But it's a major cultural moment occurring right now. | ||
The Hail Hitler song from Yay. | ||
Yeah, we're not even going to look at it. | ||
Although it's a funny song. | ||
I'll give him that. | ||
It is a funny song. | ||
He's like, they go to my Twitter, but they don't know how I'm feeling. | ||
Well, on your Twitter, you wrote that until you were 14, you and your cousin used to... | ||
I mean, how do you feel about that, I guess? | ||
Yeah, how do you feel about that, yay? | ||
I don't know. | ||
You go to your Twitter, and you're just like, I love pornography! | ||
It's like, nobody understands me. | ||
Nobody understands me! | ||
Just posting porn. | ||
Just like... | ||
unidentified
|
Posting his wife. | |
Posting his wife completely naked. | ||
unidentified
|
Just being like, I'm so misunderstood. | |
Okay, dude. | ||
Okay, man. | ||
You're okay, yeah. | ||
It's great. | ||
It's really great. | ||
It's really great. | ||
Look, all I'm saying, all I'm saying is that, can we just be honest? | ||
Can we all just be honest for once in our lives about the things that we're seeing and hearing? | ||
I don't even have, I don't have any clips to show from you. | ||
I don't have any brilliant, you know, breakdown of this, but for those of you not aware, there has been a very intense whirlpool of drama in the YouTube community recently over Israel-Palestine, | ||
iDubs, H3H3, Hassan Piker, and it is the, in a way, just the most hilarious, The most hilarious display of the generalized insanity of the left, the generalized inconsistency and incompetence of the left, and the shallowness and moral bankruptcy represented by just absolutely everything that they believe. | ||
Maybe I'll have to find you some clips of this. | ||
But I have to say, there was a debate. | ||
Between H3H3, Ethan Klein, one of the biggest YouTubers of all times, and Hassan Piker, the darling and the superstar of Twitch. | ||
And they're arguing about Israel-Palestine. | ||
And they know absolutely nothing. | ||
It's like shocking. | ||
It's completely insane how utterly... | ||
Uninformed these people are. | ||
But it's also hilarious to see the left absolutely tear itself apart by taking only the most extreme positions on absolutely everything and treating every minor slight like it itself is an act of genocide. | ||
And without getting into the specifics we're going to return to this idea on the other side of just like How we're dealing with people who are so utterly devoid of human nature. | ||
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host Harrison Smith. | ||
We got a lot of videos to get to, a lot of stories to get into today. | ||
I really shouldn't even bring it up because I haven't gotten any clips or anything. | ||
This Hassan Piker H3H3 debate. | ||
I probably just need, I need you to grab clips so I can illustrate to people. | ||
But, what I'll say is, there's something just deeply, fundamentally askew in the beliefs of the left, and it's hilarious to see them, you know, crash into these weapons that they wield against other people. | ||
And I'll tell you, The reason I was thinking about it just now is because it was this debate that finally made me understand to some degree why people react the way they do to my stance on Palestine and Israel. | ||
You watch that debate, and there's absolutely no question about it. | ||
Ethan Klein won. | ||
And Ethan Klein is the pro-Israel person. | ||
Should we even get into this? | ||
I don't know. | ||
It might be too... | ||
It might be too... | ||
I could give you the whole backstory. | ||
It's all stupid. | ||
But basically, Ethan Klein, H3H3, gigantic YouTuber, very, very big and influential during the anti-SJW days, 20... | ||
16, 2017. | ||
Total free speech warrior. | ||
Like actually was at one of the first lawsuits that like set precedent about free speech on YouTube. | ||
But then something broke in his mind. | ||
And he went way left. | ||
Super far left. | ||
And he had this talk show called The Leftovers. | ||
Leftovers with Hassan Piker, who is the nephew of Cenk Uygur. | ||
Who's maybe one of the dumbest people to ever pretend to be a political analyst. | ||
I mean, it is truly something to behold. | ||
So they had a podcast together until October 7th. | ||
Until October 7th. | ||
And then the entire thing has become a just absolutely horrific flame war. | ||
We're just, people are calling CPS on Ethan Klein's children. | ||
Their podcast broke up. | ||
They became arch enemies. | ||
It's been this massive drama where the Palestinian side is just awful. | ||
They're just the worst. | ||
Really just the absolute worst. | ||
And it's so, it's funny because, I gotta show you clips. | ||
I really just shouldn't even talk about it right now. | ||
I really shouldn't, because people who haven't seen it have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about. | ||
So maybe I'll just move on. | ||
Maybe I will just move on. | ||
But I will just have to say that, like, the reason I even want to talk about it is one thing, the reason I brought it up is because, like, this thing with Kanye. | ||
I like Kanye. | ||
I think he's funny as hell. | ||
I think he is a true artist at the end of the day. | ||
Like, say what you want about it. | ||
Hey, that's our set. | ||
They copied our set. | ||
Say what you want about him. | ||
The man is... | ||
At least he was a genius musically. | ||
But it's like you listen to the song and I see so many people online just being like, whoa, this song's amazing. | ||
And it's like you just like it because it says Hail Hitler. | ||
I mean, let's just be honest. | ||
The song sucks. | ||
The song kind of actually sucks. | ||
In the same way, I'm on the side of the Palestinians when it comes to... | ||
What's happening in Gaza and Israel and the surrounding area. | ||
But I can still watch a debate between a Palestinian and an Israeli and be like, man, the Israeli guy really cooked there. | ||
Really won that argument handily. | ||
What can I say? | ||
And I'm just trying to figure out what it is going on. | ||
Because you've got the... | ||
The Jewish sort of character, the Jewish nature of like the power structure where like criticizing Israel is sort of the worst thing you could possibly do. | ||
And so you've got these people on the left who are bucking that, who are not afraid of standing up against intimidation or Because that stuff happens, right? | ||
Streamers start talking about Israel-Palestine. | ||
You get some extremists on both sides, I'm sure. | ||
But it can be a little bit risky. | ||
It feels very much a rebellious act in the modern media landscape to be strongly anti-Israel. | ||
And yet, they're still in this mindset. | ||
Of like total submission to the system. | ||
It's just a very bizarre place to be. | ||
And as I'm watching it, I'm just sitting there going, there's probably a lot of people that listen to Hassan Piker who, you know, are sick of hearing the Israel glazing that goes on in all these different outlets and they find somebody that's like, Unabashedly standing up against it. | ||
And they're like, oh yeah, he's a rebel. | ||
This is awesome. | ||
This is cool. | ||
He's saying things nobody else will say. | ||
This is so cool. | ||
But then like, he's still just an establishment cuck, slave-minded demon. | ||
Like he's just bad and stupid and wrong and makes his positions look bad because he doesn't know how to articulate them. | ||
And he just starts panicking and freaking out and yelling anytime things don't go exactly his way. | ||
And I'm just like, do they know? | ||
That people like me exist? | ||
Do they know that you don't have to be a retarded communist to be against genocide, to be against war, to be against the control of our government by a foreign state? | ||
Do they know? | ||
Do people know about that? | ||
Do the young people know that the choice is not between the establishment and Hassan Piker, the establishment and socialist communists? | ||
Do they know that you can actually have a principled, merciful stance and still oppose Israel? | ||
I don't know. | ||
I don't know if people understand this. | ||
I don't know if people know. | ||
And I feel like... | ||
unidentified
|
I don't know. | |
I don't know. | ||
I gotta just find the clips of it. | ||
I gotta just find the clips of it. | ||
Because you've got this guy. | ||
unidentified
|
I'd like to expand on this. | |
Yeah, yeah, okay. | ||
Did you watch any of it? | ||
unidentified
|
No, no, but I do want to talk about something on a very similar vein, which was the Dave Smith-Douglas Murray debate. | |
And there are other commentators out in the space who have, I think, recognized that that conversation that took place about Israel-Palestine between two people who... | ||
Neither of them may not have been the best representative. | ||
It was described as a limited hangout, in a sense, where it is a controlled debate. | ||
It is something where the paradigm presents a false dichotomy. | ||
I think that when you look at a debate, again, between Hassan Piker and Ethan Klein, really, what is it? | ||
Are the best points being made? | ||
Are those two the best people to represent that debate? | ||
And I don't think so. | ||
No. | ||
Because again, the conclusion that you're left with is, again, it seeks to misrepresent what's actually going on there. | ||
Yeah, well, with Hassan and Ethan in particular, I mean, it's funny because you're right. | ||
It's sort of the bizarro world, you know, funhouse mirror reflection of that, right? | ||
On one side, with Dave Smith and Douglas Murray, you have two extremely polite, extremely principled. | ||
I mean, say what you will about. | ||
unidentified
|
I think Dave Smith is the Jewish libertarian guy who's willing to concede a lot of ground to Douglas Murray, who's a gay man who's married to a Jewish guy who, again, is very pro-Israel, right? | |
Makes no apologies about it. | ||
Yeah, well, and then on the other, and then the flip side is Hassan and Ethan, who are both like, basically the issue is that like, and it's so funny because Hassan Piker in this debate, he's going, will you condemn Israel's genocide? | ||
And Ethan Klein's like, yeah, yeah, it's a genocide. | ||
I definitely condemn it. | ||
I think it's horrible what Israel's doing. | ||
He's not pro-Israel by any stretch. | ||
It's just like he has family in Israel. | ||
And so then he's like, Yes, I condemn genocide. | ||
Now do you condemn, you know, the idea that every Israeli is an evil settler that's a valid target for military action? | ||
In other words, will you retract your statement that, like, my family deserves to die because of where they live and where they were born? | ||
And the other side just won't even give them that. | ||
They won't even give them that. | ||
They won't even say, like, no, you're right, there are... | ||
There's at least one innocent civilian in Israel that doesn't deserve to be kidnapped by Hamas or whatever. | ||
And it's like they won't even give him that. | ||
So it's just, it's this viciousness, this like intense, no holds barred, like extremism on both sides. | ||
But then they still are stuck in these mainstream narrative paradigms. | ||
So, like, I don't know. | ||
It's like you've got this guy, Hassan Paik, who, like, literally interviews, you know, Houthi terrorists on his stream. | ||
And I'm saying literally. | ||
He, like, has on... | ||
unidentified
|
Not the best representatives of the Palestinians. | |
You're probably not. | ||
Probably not the best representatives. | ||
And you'd think that he's like... | ||
So he's like an extremist. | ||
He's like, wow, he really is not afraid to say anything. | ||
But he is. | ||
He's terrified to break the mainstream understanding. | ||
He is completely incapable of like actually genuinely posing a fundamental threat to the system that he thinks he's fighting. | ||
Things like they start arguing about Hezbollah and their actions in Syria. | ||
To defend Bashir al-Assad and his regime. | ||
And it's Ethan Klein going, so you won't condemn Hezbollah for helping to prop up that dictator? | ||
And Assad's like, oh, I don't know anything about that. | ||
I don't know if that's the... | ||
I think you're just phrasing it the wrong way. | ||
And it's like, guys, Assad was the good guy. | ||
We can just say it. | ||
You can just say it. | ||
You can just come out and say it. | ||
Look at what's happened since Assad. | ||
Was ousted from power. | ||
Literally, ISIS took over the country and they're carrying out pogroms against the minority people there. | ||
But that's not the mainstream setup. | ||
Everybody who pays attention to this stuff, everybody knows that Syria, very conflicted country, very dangerous fault lines amongst the population, in order to keep a population like that in check, you've got to be a little bit brutal. | ||
That's just the fact of the matter. | ||
And Assad was an enemy of the globalist system, and he was removed by Turkey, by Israel, by America. | ||
I mean, it's not like you can say just Israel that wanted him gone or just whatever. | ||
The point is that, like, even as extreme as these guys portray themselves, as anti-establishment as these guys portray themselves, they don't even understand that they're still inside the matrix. | ||
They still, they don't understand, they don't have the ability to like actually break the mold or just be honest about what they believe. | ||
It's just all dishonesty. | ||
It's all, and it's just funny to me because it's like, I'm nowhere near as extreme as Hassan Piker, but I say things that he is terrified to say. | ||
Like that I don't believe Hezbollah should be a terrorist organization. | ||
It should be declared a terrorist. | ||
It's a non-state military, definitely. | ||
But as far as I know, they haven't taken down any skyscrapers in New York City. | ||
Everything I've seen of their actions seems pretty hardcore dedicated to defending Lebanon against attack from ISIS, from Israel, from anybody else. | ||
But you ask Hassan Piker, and he's like, oh, no, yeah, they're definitely terrorists. | ||
Oh, for sure. | ||
No, I would never. | ||
And then they're arguing. | ||
They're like, oh, so you support terrorism? | ||
He's like, no, no, I wouldn't say that. | ||
And it's like, I just, I'm looking in on this population because he's got so many followers. | ||
He's got so many people to listen to him every single day. | ||
And he's trapping them in this fake awakening. | ||
It's woke. | ||
I mean, and I've said it a million times. | ||
That is what woke means, right? | ||
The fake awakening. | ||
It means you're telling people that they're waking up, but only insofar as they are actually falling deeper into a dream state, within a dream state, thinking that they're awake while being no closer to freedom. | ||
It's just a fascinating little view into some deeply un-American mindsets. | ||
Some deeply un-American mindsets. | ||
And on that note... | ||
I'm going to go to clip number four here because this is one of those things that people genuinely can't understand what's happening here. | ||
Donald Trump praised the bravery of the Houthi fighters. | ||
It's been 10 years. | ||
Trump does this to everybody. | ||
They still don't get it. | ||
They're still just like, how could Trump praise the Houthis? | ||
And it's like... | ||
Not everything has to be black and white. | ||
And this isn't even a black and white issue. | ||
To honor your enemy is a good thing. | ||
Just period. | ||
It really is something I think we're losing fundamentally from our character as a nation or as a people. | ||
Is that mindset of like... | ||
You have a problem with somebody. | ||
Your country has a problem with another country. | ||
You duke it out. | ||
Somebody wins. | ||
Somebody loses. | ||
You shake hands. | ||
You settle your differences. | ||
And then it's over. | ||
Like, that just doesn't exist outside of the Western world. | ||
That concept is anathema to, like, everybody else. | ||
And you see it time and time again, especially when you have, like, immigrants talking about the Civil War in America. | ||
Right? | ||
Their families wouldn't arrive for 200 years, but somehow they hate the Confederates. | ||
Like, how do you despise the Confederates more than the Northerners that were actively being killed by them? | ||
The Northerner veterans, 30, 50 years after the Civil War, were shaking hands, Yankee and Confederate, bearing the hatchet, coming together. | ||
And it's like, how is it... | ||
The people who were actually firing at each other, actually stabbing each other with bayonets, they're able to get over this conflict. | ||
They're able to forgive and forget, settle your differences, bury the hatchet, be done with it, move forward together. | ||
And then you've got some Guatemalan that got here last year who wants to fight the Civil War again because they hate Confederates that much. | ||
And it's like, that's not what we do here. | ||
You don't hold on to generational strife. | ||
And harbor in your heart some seething hatred of a people who never did anything wrong to you and you've never met them and haven't existed for a hundred years. | ||
That's not the way we are as a people. | ||
That's not the way we got to where we are now as a civilization. | ||
By this lack of mercy, lack of understanding, lack of honor, really, at the end of the day. | ||
So it's just fascinating to me. | ||
And again, I'm not making the... | ||
Argument clearly, but I think you'll see it if you start looking for it. | ||
In things like the way that people respond to Donald Trump saying, look, the Houthis are very brave. | ||
And it's like, how could you? | ||
These are people that, I mean, Yemen. | ||
Yemen might be the poorest country in the world. | ||
I mean, I don't know if there's a poorer one. | ||
Same with the Palestinians. | ||
You don't have to like them. | ||
You don't have to appreciate what they do. | ||
But yeah, I think it took a little bit of bravery to fly a homemade parasailing device over the prison wall into the nest of your heavily armed enemies. | ||
It was bravery. | ||
You cannot like that. | ||
You can say it was stupid, it was evil, it was violent, it was vicious. | ||
Yeah, it was all those things. | ||
It was also very brave. | ||
It's also very brave. | ||
And if you can't admit that, there's something wrong with you. | ||
It's just making sense to anybody. | ||
Let's go to the clip here. | ||
Clip number four. | ||
Here's Donald Trump showing that he truly does. | ||
He has the heart of a Western aristocrat. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
But so we do. | ||
We take their word for it. | ||
We hit them very hard. | ||
They had a great capacity to withstand punishment. | ||
They took tremendous punishment. | ||
And you could say there's a lot of bravery there. | ||
It was amazing what they took. | ||
But we honor their commitment and their word. | ||
They gave us their word that they wouldn't be shooting ships anymore, and we honor that. | ||
So again, you seeing your man. | ||
Oh, that's okay. | ||
So Hassan Abiy, you seeing your man, Asmongold. | ||
Oh my God. | ||
Okay, so let's break this down. | ||
So Asmongold likes Trump. | ||
So Hassan Abiy is, Hassan whatever, Cheng's nephew is saying. | ||
Check it out, Asmongold, Trump loves Houthis. | ||
That's actually kind of a great example. | ||
Does Hassan think that Trump loves the Houthis now? | ||
Does he think that by saying they're brave, he's like, you know, ha, I was right. | ||
The terrorists are the good guys. | ||
See, Trump himself said it. | ||
What do you not understand about this? | ||
You can say somebody is evil, vicious, they deserve to die, they should be crushed under the heel of whatever power can destroy them, but they're also extremely brave. | ||
They're extremely brave people. | ||
It's like there really is something in the leftist mind that cannot understand these things. | ||
They cannot understand that you can both appreciate a characteristic of a person or a people while not Supporting everything they do. | ||
And you can criticize a people or a person and not want them dead and their family dead. | ||
There's just a rush to the extremes that happens in these mindsets that is indicative of childishness. | ||
They're like children. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
I don't know what to make about that. | ||
I really don't. | ||
Because again, you've got, and Trump always does this, and again, it's like, I mean, they genuinely can't understand not hating. | ||
That's like kind of at the heart of it. | ||
They genuinely, and I think it's, it actually explains a lot. | ||
It explains why they think that we are hateful. | ||
Because to them, those are the only positions to have. | ||
Total groveling submission. | ||
And seething hate. | ||
Those are the only temperatures that they operate at. | ||
And again, it does make sense because it's all projection from them. | ||
So anytime a conservative talks about the problems in the black community, they cannot comprehend that as, I am both criticizing the community and I love the community. | ||
I'm criticizing them because I don't want them to be mired in failure. | ||
I don't want them to be a drag on the society around them. | ||
I don't want them to have to live in a violent, chaotic, mad world of gangs and drugs. | ||
That's wrong and bad and a characteristic of the black community these days. | ||
That is way too sophisticated of an idea for the average leftist. | ||
You either think everything that black people do is amazing and worth celebrating and wonderful and powerful and you should affirm it with everything you've got. | ||
Or you think that they're subhumans and need to be eradicated. | ||
It's just like, guys, this is why we can't have nice things. | ||
This is why we can't get anything done. | ||
Because our whole system is increasingly filled with these types of people. | ||
AOC is like one of the best examples, right? | ||
AOC is always writing things about the Confederacy as if A, still exists. | ||
B, her family was anywhere near the United States when that conflict happened. | ||
And see, they weren't punished enough, right? | ||
It's never enough. | ||
Their entire civilization stomped into the dirt. | ||
People humiliated. | ||
Everything just utterly, literally burned to the ground. | ||
And here, a hundred years later, people are like, they still haven't felt it enough. | ||
We still need to punish them. | ||
Like, is this white supremacy? | ||
Is this an aspect of white supremacy? | ||
Forgiving your enemies? | ||
Loving your enemies? | ||
Moving on, closing the door to a conflict, not demanding absolute total destruction of everybody that's not you. | ||
Trump embodies that. | ||
Trump expresses that and then everybody flips out and can't even fathom the world that he's operating in because they're hateful idiots. | ||
unidentified
|
Are you the Oklahoma City bomber? | |
Maybe one of the benefits of me talking to you today is that You'll see that maybe not everything is true that you've heard about me. | ||
On the morning of April 19, 1995, a decorated Gulf War combat vet blew up the federal building in Oklahoma City using a truck bomb that he didn't build and a rider truck that he didn't rent with the help of a passenger who didn't exist. | ||
Having just gotten away with the largest act of terrorism on U.S. soil to date, the Fort Bragg train Special Forces Sheep Drip dropout blended in with the crowd by making his getaway in a car without a license plate and was immediately pulled over. | ||
The ATF was the supposed target of the attack, but luckily all of their agents were out of the office that morning. | ||
Later that day, the president boldly declared... | ||
unidentified
|
We will find the people who did this. | |
And... | ||
When we do, justice will be swift, certain, and severe. | ||
Except for... | ||
John Doe No. 2. John Doe No. 2. John Doe No. 2. Who, according to the FBI, never existed. | ||
In McVeigh's unprecedented three-and-a-half-week trial, the prosecution didn't show the CCTV footage of him and John Doe No. 2 parking the rider truck. | ||
Still, a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists, including 300 bombing victims, insist on talking about facts and evidence and refuse to simply believe what they've been told a million times by people in tailored suits with well-coffed hair. | ||
They quote the U.S. Army Brigadier General and the FBI Crime Lab whistleblower and the inventor of the neutron bomb who point out the physical impossibility that the rider truck bomb did the damage to the building. | ||
But that doesn't matter, because if there were other bombs in the building that day, we would have heard about them. | ||
unidentified
|
The second explosive was found and diffused. | |
I think he sent another bomb. | ||
unidentified
|
The Justice Department is reporting that a second explosive device has been found. | |
They then found a third device, which was also larger than the first. | ||
And I see another bomb truck going, so apparently they're going to try to get out that third bomb. | ||
The FBI claims to have lost the footage showing Muvay and John Doe No. 2 parking the truck in front of the Murrah building that morning, but that's understandable because the Bureau has a lot of important evidence to store. | ||
Terry Nichols insists the FBI was involved in the plot, but thankfully a judge has saved us the trouble of listening to him by preventing lawyers from deposing him. | ||
There was a bomb squad truck parked across the street two hours before the blast, but that just shows the authorities were prepared for anything. | ||
And... | ||
unidentified
|
Other documents obtained by 2020 show that someone called the Executive Secretary's office at the Justice Department in Washington and said the Morrow building had been bombed. | |
But this was 24 minutes before the blast. | ||
But that just shows the public was unusually vigilant that morning. | ||
Also... | ||
unidentified
|
Apparently, before the bombing, Governor Frank Keating's brother, Mark, had been working on a novel about a terrorist bombing in Oklahoma City. | |
Stranger still. | ||
One of the characters in the novel was named Thomas McVeigh. | ||
But that's probably just a coincidence. | ||
McVeigh wrote a letter to his sister where he admitted to being a secret special forces operative, and he complained to friends of the pain in his ass from an army-implanted microchip. | ||
But that's crazy, because if he didn't actually leave the army in 1991, there would be proof of that. | ||
McVeigh was not executed on May 16, 2001, as scheduled, because... | ||
unidentified
|
The FBI had failed to turn over thousands of pages of evidence to McVeigh's defense attorneys. | |
But the execution went ahead on June 11th. | ||
In a highly unusual and secret agreement, no autopsy was performed. | ||
One witness said he was still breathing, and the prison officials admitted his hearse was a decoy. | ||
Then, the case was officially closed. | ||
And if you question any part of this story, you are a paranoid, wingnut, birther, truther, tenther, prepper, conspiracy loon who would bring up any of these points ever again. | ||
Ever. | ||
This message has been brought to you by the friends of the FBI, ATF, DOJ, CIA, SBLC, MSN, and the U.S. Army. | ||
And remember, ignorance is strength. | ||
The absolute classic by James Corbett, very similar to his 9-11 official story breakdown. | ||
And it's worth just reminding everybody of how the world used to be. | ||
Can you imagine if they tried to pull that off today? | ||
Can you imagine what X would look like if it was around in 1992? | ||
For that bombing? | ||
I mean, they used to just, everything was so blatant. | ||
We would have had that whole thing figured out in three days if X had been around. | ||
They would have identified that second person in 15 minutes. | ||
I mean, it is a different world today, folks. | ||
If nothing else signals the victory that our side is having, it's the fact that not only is that type of stuff just acknowledged reality now that that was a conspiracy, but they'll never be able to pull it off ever again. | ||
unidentified
|
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
All right, folks. | ||
We're waiting at Donald Trump's announcement slated for 9 o 'clock Central Time. | ||
Should be going live any minute. | ||
And it looks like they're going to talk about the trade agreement with the UK, the first official, you know, fully fleshed out tariff deal since the tariffs were imposed. | ||
Trump seems very excited about it, so we'll go to his speech just as soon as he... | ||
It goes to make it. | ||
And in the meantime, let's take a look down the other path. | ||
Let's take a look at the present that could have been in a different timeline, in a different universe, in a different dimension, somewhere out there. | ||
Joe Biden never does the debate. | ||
They continue to cover up his... | ||
Failing mental state. | ||
And at this moment, I don't know, would we have made it this far? | ||
We're three months in. | ||
Could he have gone three months without starting a nuclear war with all the stuff going on right now? | ||
I don't know. | ||
I don't know. | ||
What I do know is that every time he goes on camera, it is a powerful argument in favor of listening to Infowars. | ||
It's a powerful reminder of the person that every establishment talking head in the mainstream media, every Democrat politician, every lying scumbag in the establishment array, this is who they wanted to run our country. | ||
This is who they told us it was evil and wrong and disinformation to claim wasn't all there, wasn't... | ||
Totally competent. | ||
And it just puts in such stark and undeniable relief how right our choice, how correct our choice truly was. | ||
So let's go now to clip number eight. | ||
Joe Biden emerges from the grave to say he was disappointed how President Trump treated Zelensky. | ||
In the Oval Office. | ||
So let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
What did you make of those scenes in the Oval Office, President Trump and President Zelensky? | |
Sir? | ||
Wake up, sir. | ||
unidentified
|
I found it. | |
Hello? | ||
unidentified
|
Sort of beneath America. | |
Did you? | ||
The way that took place. | ||
Uh-huh. | ||
And the way we talk about now that. | ||
Well, it's the Gulf of America. | ||
Maybe we're going to have to take back Panama. | ||
Maybe we need to acquire Greenland. | ||
Maybe Canada should be... | ||
What the hell's going on here? | ||
Who are you? | ||
What president ever talks like that? | ||
Who are you? | ||
unidentified
|
That's not who we are. | |
Why are you asking me questions? | ||
unidentified
|
We're about freedom, democracy, opportunity. | |
Not about confiscation. | ||
I can hear your passion. | ||
Oh, is that what that was? | ||
unidentified
|
I can hear your anxiety that the world is changing the way it has. | |
Did you see the grin on his face when he said, I can hear your passion. | ||
I can hear your passion. | ||
unidentified
|
You don't treat Zelensky bad. | |
You treat him good. | ||
And like, how many examples? | ||
I mean, this really is the dichotomy. | ||
It's between President Trump and J.D. Vance telling Zelensky, hey. | ||
You're in our house. | ||
Why don't you show some gratitude for the billions of dollars? | ||
How about you show some gratitude for the fact that you'd be dead in a ditch if it weren't for us? | ||
How about you don't make demands while you're begging? | ||
How about that? | ||
Between hardcore, strident, muscular nationalism versus Joe Biden. | ||
Should we roll the compilation? | ||
I mean, Donald Trump Is a little bit rude to other world leaders. | ||
Joe Biden falls asleep during their conversations. | ||
Joe Biden poops himself while they're talking. | ||
I mean, that's the difference here. | ||
This is the comparison that's worth making. | ||
And they tell you they had no idea how incompetent he was. | ||
And this interview they just put out. | ||
It was supposed to make him look good. | ||
I mean, the BBC interviewer there is licking his feet, right? | ||
I can tell how passionate you are about this. | ||
They ask him the question for the first five seconds. | ||
His eyes are closed and his head is down. | ||
unidentified
|
He's just like, the thing is, that's not who we are, man. | |
That's just, that's not who we are. | ||
Oh my God. | ||
That's who they wanted to be president. | ||
That's who they wanted to be our commander-in-chief. | ||
Pathetic, really. | ||
Really, it's pathetic. | ||
But again, Joe Biden fell asleep during meetings with world leaders. | ||
Literally fell asleep. | ||
I'm not just saying that. | ||
Now, the pooping in the pants thing, I'm just saying that. | ||
I have no proof of that whatsoever. | ||
I'm just looking at the body language. | ||
Believing the rumors. | ||
But he definitely fell asleep during multiple meetings with world leaders. | ||
And that was the option that we had to make. | ||
We made the right one. | ||
So thank God. | ||
So thank God we ended up where we are. | ||
We ended up with an administration composed of people like Stephen Miller. | ||
I want to go to this video. | ||
Stephen Miller masterpiece, clip number 11. Just to drive home. | ||
What it is we're doing here. | ||
What it is we're fighting for. | ||
What it is that compels us to risk going up against this globalist system against all odds. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 11. For years, professional conservatives and professional Republicans, all they ever wanted to do was talk about GDP, GDP, GDP. | ||
unidentified
|
But you know what? | |
President Trump did an amazing job growing this economy. | ||
But what's so much more important than that is defending this nation's heritage, its culture, its values, so that our children, our sons and daughters can grow up in a country that is proud of its past and proud of its destiny. | ||
I speak to you today. | ||
I would gladly trade, if I had the choice, one point off the GDP. | ||
If in exchange, every single American child could go to a school where they were taught to love their country, its values, its heroes, its history, its story. | ||
Thank you. | ||
No nation, ladies and gentlemen, no nation can long survive that teaches its own children to hate it. | ||
That's as unnatural as a family that discards its own children. | ||
We are doomed, ladies and gentlemen, if we don't stand up for our nation's children. | ||
unidentified
|
We are doomed if we don't. | |
And I know that you will with all of your heart and soul. | ||
I know that you will because you understand the most important truth of all. | ||
America is not an idea. | ||
America is a nation. | ||
A nation has families. | ||
A nation has towns. | ||
It has communities. | ||
A nation raises armies. | ||
A nation has a culture, a story, heritage. | ||
These are the things we're fighting and dying for. | ||
And a nation, ladies and gentlemen, a nation has borders. | ||
Ideas, ideas don't have borders or boundaries. | ||
Ideas don't have towns and families and ideas don't have borders. | ||
We have citizens. | ||
So we are a nation that believes in ideas, but we are still, ladies and gentlemen, a nation not only with the right, but the sacred duty to take care of our own citizens above every other consideration. | ||
Our own children, our own families, our own communities, and to defend and protect our own sovereign borders is a sacred obligation. | ||
Very, very powerful stuff from Steve Miller there. | ||
Reminding ourselves of the fundamental difference between the left and the right in this country right now. | ||
That it really is a battle in its foundation, in its purest form as nationalism versus globalism. | ||
of the idea that the nation state is an important construct necessary for the betterment of humanity or whether it's an impediment to the globalist control. | ||
you And just to sort of illustrate this, to clarify this, America is not an array of corporations. | ||
America is not a network of corporations. | ||
America is not the GDP or the money that can be made. | ||
Because that is utterly independent from A, the material quality of life that Americans are experiencing as our GDP has continuously gone up while our quality of life has gone down in almost every regard. | ||
But it also is completely independent and totally in contradiction of American values. | ||
The false dichotomy that has been very successfully seeded into the conversation is that it's a conflict between pure capitalism, And beneficent communism or socialism. | ||
This is completely false. | ||
This is completely ahistorical. | ||
And the reality is that the American system always was built in a way and was continually reinforced in the idea that corporations were only allowed to exist as long as they benefited the people. | ||
That's why you have some of the greatest American heroes. | ||
Like Teddy Roosevelt, as trustbusters, breaking up monopolies, breaking up corporate power structures that were able to manipulate or extort or in some way negatively affect the American people. | ||
We don't need a new system. | ||
We don't need to redistribute wealth to stand up against corporations. | ||
We don't need to submit entirely to corporations to uphold some value of capitalism. | ||
As if monetary exchange is the be-all end-all of human interaction. | ||
And here's a great sort of symbol of this. | ||
Disney is building the Middle East first theme park in Abu Dhabi. | ||
As Drew Holden at Drew Holden 360 points out, enormously funny that the company they got so bent out of shape by the supposedly oppressive conservatism of Florida. | ||
Has no issues with the United Arab Emirates where you can be sent to jail for public blasphemy. | ||
Corporations don't have values. | ||
They don't have beliefs. | ||
They don't have shame and feel hypocrisy. | ||
They do whatever makes money. | ||
And they wield their power however they can. | ||
So it's just... | ||
When you hear these corporations, when you hear the CEOs of these corporations talk about the sacred duty they have to uphold progressive beliefs, even in the face of laws against them, they'd rather go bankrupt and shut down Disney World and submit to the evil demands of Florida. | ||
But Abu Dhabi wants to build a theme park? | ||
Sure, come on in. | ||
Welcome, sir. | ||
Can we get the women out of the office? | ||
The Abu Dhabi guys are coming in. | ||
Get all the women in the office on the other floor because the Abu Dhabi guys are coming in. | ||
We don't want to have them see uncovered hair or something else offensive, right? | ||
These corporations believe nothing. | ||
They exist only to get as much as they possibly can, to drain as much as they possibly can from the corpse of our nation. | ||
So don't fall for the false dichotomy that Is being pushed by the very corporations that are so flagrantly hypocritical and insincere in everything that they do. | ||
Okay, let's just remember that, shall we? | ||
And we have a big story here about the Supreme Court. | ||
And I just want to ask a few questions about this. | ||
I want to apply some basic logic here. | ||
I'm no constitutional scholar, after all. | ||
I'm just a guy. | ||
Supreme Court Chief Justice Roberts lays down the law on judiciary power and veiled a swipe at Trump. | ||
It says the judiciary's role, Robert emphasized in comments at a public event in Buffalo, New York, is, quote, to decide cases, but in the course of that, to check the excesses of Congress and the executive. | ||
He noted in our Constitution, the judiciary is a co-equal branch of government separate from the others with the authority to interpret the Constitution as law and strike down, obviously, acts of Congress or acts of the president. | ||
So here's my question. | ||
When you say co-equal, what does that mean to you? | ||
Does it mean superior? | ||
Because that's the wrong word. | ||
If you meant superior, you should have said superior. | ||
In other words, if you're equal with someone, if you're co-equal, and there's a disagreement, who wins? | ||
If you're co-equal, and the executive believes something, and the Supreme Court believes something, who gets their way? | ||
Because what he's saying here is the Supreme Court is co-equal to Congress and the executive. | ||
That's why everything we say goes, and we get to override everything they do, and we are the final decision, and it's our choice that gets implemented. | ||
That's not co-equal. | ||
That's superior. | ||
Like, that's what he's saying here. | ||
So just like when they say nobody's above the law, when what they actually mean is we're all above the law, but we'll deploy against Trump as needed. | ||
When they say we're co-equal and we get to decide at the end of the day what happens, they're just lying. | ||
He's just lying. | ||
And he's manipulating language. | ||
And he's just being dishonest. | ||
He doesn't believe the Supreme Court is co-equal. | ||
He believes it's superior. | ||
He believes that in a conflict between two branches of government, his branch wins. | ||
That's not co-equal, is it? | ||
Am I wrong here? | ||
I get how the government's supposed to function. | ||
Congress writes the laws. | ||
Executives enforce the law. | ||
Supreme Court decides on law. | ||
Settles differences. | ||
So in that case, if the executive believes something and Congress believes something else, Then the Supreme Court could be the deciding factor. | ||
But they don't get to unilaterally override the other two branches of government. | ||
That's not how this system was ever set up. | ||
It is supposed to be co-equal, not superior. | ||
Am I wrong? | ||
He cautioned, that innovation doesn't work if the judiciary is not independent. | ||
Okay? | ||
Is that something special and unique about the Supreme Court and the judiciary? | ||
Or could we swap The term judiciary with executive and completely abolish all the arguments you're making. | ||
That innovation doesn't work if the executive is not independent. | ||
How could it? | ||
How could you have a system of co-equal branches of government where one branch has to be independent but the other branch is completely dependent on the first branch? | ||
This doesn't make any sense. | ||
This is a judicial power grab by the Supreme Court. | ||
He says its job is to obviously decide cases, but in the course of that, check the excesses of Congress or the executive, and that does require a degree of independence, but not superiority. | ||
But of course, his comments drew a long round of applause from the judges and lawyers at the event in western New York to celebrate the 125th anniversary of the federal court there. | ||
Roberts was born in Buffalo but moved to Indiana when he was 10 years old. | ||
Trump has repeatedly, insultingly attacked judges who decisions he disagrees with, often triggering chilling threats against them by his supporters, and has called for their impeachment. | ||
Thank you. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
I was thinking about this. | ||
I mean, we knew that this was going to be their strategy. | ||
We reported on this for, like, all of 2024 because they were saying it. | ||
They were preparing for a loss to Trump by getting the judicial contests ready. | ||
Getting all the lawyers, getting all the judges in position. | ||
The problem is, even knowing that that was their strategy, even knowing that that's their tactic, how do you confront and work around it? | ||
How does Trump get things done when you have this array of 700 judges across the entire United States that apparently any one of them Can at any moment override any decision of the executive branch. | ||
That's not how this system was constructed. | ||
That is an abuse of power. | ||
It's an abuse of the system. | ||
And I still don't really understand how they have the authority to make the decisions that they're making. | ||
If our government has co-equal branches, they do not get to interfere in the executive in the way that they're interfering. | ||
Two stories from today, but it's every single day. | ||
More and more stories. | ||
Every single day. | ||
More and more headlines. | ||
Judges stopping. | ||
Now they've said the Pentagon can't use the planes the way the Pentagon wants to use them. | ||
Yesterday, a judge says you have to accept 12,000 refugees for some uncertain, undisclosed reason. | ||
There was another decision by a court. | ||
And you've got Stephen Miller, who again, you know, we show the videos. | ||
I don't doubt his sincerity or his, you know, how strongly he feels about this stuff. | ||
You know, he's acting frustrated. | ||
He's tweeting out about this judgment going, so now the judge thinks that it controls the Pentagon. | ||
This is out of control. | ||
And it's like, well, does the judge control the Pentagon? | ||
No. | ||
Then why does it matter what they say? | ||
I don't get this. | ||
I don't get this. | ||
That's like Matt saying, I can't buy a boat. | ||
And it's like, are you in charge? | ||
No? | ||
Then I'm going to buy the boat. | ||
What are we talking about here? | ||
It's somebody without the authority telling you you can't do something. | ||
And just imagine that. | ||
Imagine I want to buy a boat, my money, my bank account. | ||
Somebody else. | ||
Matt, Dan, just anybody. | ||
He goes, you can't do that. | ||
unidentified
|
And I get on Twitter going, why are you throwing me under the boat? | |
I don't know, man. | ||
Here's the first name that came to mind. | ||
Don't you dare try to abuse your power with me. | ||
unidentified
|
Boats are a great investment. | |
I'm a bad example. | ||
unidentified
|
I can actually get you into one. | |
Bad example. | ||
That's what I mean. | ||
Imagine going on Twitter and going, so now Matt has control of my bank account and says I can't buy a boat? | ||
unidentified
|
They actually call me Motorboat and Matt. | |
Do they? | ||
unidentified
|
In some circles. | |
I don't want to know. | ||
I don't want to know. | ||
But I really don't understand. | ||
I mean, they don't have the authority. | ||
They don't have the ability to have veto power of the executive. | ||
They just don't. | ||
And the way they're getting away with this, the way that they're carrying this off, is that they have a massive, well-orchestrated, well-intertwined array of law firms, lawyers, NGOs, people inside the federal government that are working with judges that they know will decide in their favor. | ||
And so they put forward the cases that the judge can say, well, I'm not just inserting myself, I have a case to decide here, and I decide for the plaintiffs every single time. | ||
Every single time. | ||
And we have to go through the whole rigmarole. | ||
And usually the choices get overturned. | ||
But it's a sincere question that I don't really have an answer to other than just executive dictatorship. | ||
The executive just saying, this doesn't work. | ||
This can't work. | ||
The judiciary, if it can't get itself in control, then we're just going to have to start ignoring it. | ||
We're just going to have to start doing what we have to do, regardless of what the judiciary said. | ||
That's a very dangerous setup to be in. | ||
I don't want to be in that situation. | ||
unidentified
|
But the left is forcing us into it. | |
Taking a record of the hearts and minds of the American people, it's the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
All right, welcome back. | ||
Folks, this is the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
We've got some people to expose here. | ||
We've got two Republicans to get into. | ||
Tom Tillis and Casey Means. | ||
You may recognize the name Casey Means. | ||
Her brother, Callie Means, is a... | ||
I guess a health activist. | ||
We showed his video. | ||
Very powerful video. | ||
He was in Davos or somewhere and he was saying that all of this incredible wealth and power of the medical industry has not led to a healthier society. | ||
And of course he starts going off because he looks at the audience and says, are you laughing? | ||
What's funny about that? | ||
You think I'm wrong? | ||
What metric can you show showing that we're better off than we were 20, 40 years ago. | ||
It was very powerful and very good, and from that clip alone, you'd think this was a family of very sincere and strident conservative activists, but everybody's kind of freaking out. | ||
So as far as I understand it, Casey Means was put forward as Surgeon General, after the previous nominee was exposed by Laura Loomer. | ||
And as Casey Means was put forward as the new name to go into this position, the outcry began. | ||
And we'll go to a thread here by Next News Networks about this, titled Red Alert, Casey Means Exposed. | ||
Trump's Surgeon General nominee is triggering massive backlash. | ||
Across the health freedom movement, whistleblowers, doctors, insiders, even RFK Jr.'s own VP pick are now speaking out. | ||
Here's why this story is exploding. | ||
Nicole Shanahan, RFK Jr.'s running mate, dropped a bomb, accusing Casey Means and her family of acting like Manchurian assets. | ||
She says she was promised Casey would not be promoted, and now she's calling it a betrayal. | ||
So in response to somebody asking about Casey Means, she says, yes, it's very strange. | ||
Doesn't make any sense. | ||
I was promised that if I supported RFK Jr. in his Senate confirmation, that neither of these siblings, Casey or Callie, would be working under HHS or in an appointment and that people much more qualified would be. | ||
I don't know if RFK very clearly lied to me or what is going on and has been clear in recent conversations that he is reporting to somebody who regularly is controlling his decisions and it is not President Trump. | ||
With regards to the siblings, there is something very artificial and aggressive about them, almost like they were bred and raised mentally. | ||
That is a bombshell statement. | ||
I have to say, that is a... | ||
That's pretty huge. | ||
I mean, she is accusing RFK Jr. of betraying her. | ||
And she's saying that he's doing so because it's clear that he is answering to somebody above him who's not President Trump. | ||
Now, that's not... | ||
Speculation by some professional conspiracy theorist, just assuming this is the case, this is from his running mate, his former running mate, a person who would have been his VP had he won the election. | ||
Somebody who talks to him on a regular basis, somebody who knows him extremely well, I have to imagine. | ||
She says when she talks to him, It has been clear in recent conversations that he is reporting to someone regularly who is controlling his decisions. | ||
That is a major accusation. | ||
Okay? | ||
Let me just let that sink in for a minute. | ||
So why is she so against Casey Means? | ||
Well, doctors are turning on her as well. | ||
Dr. Susan Humphreys and Dr. Henry Ely, both well-known voices in the medical freedom space, are calling her out. | ||
No experience, no stance on vaccine harms, total silence for years, a MAGA pick from heaven, think hell. | ||
So, Dr. Suzanne Humphreys says, Dr. Jack Cruz tried to tell us. | ||
Mary Tally Bowen was on the podcast too. | ||
She knows the deal with means. | ||
Let's see how this all pans out. | ||
I can't help but think this is a very carefully groomed and selected person. | ||
Talk about no clinical experience. | ||
Talk about... | ||
Talks a great game about everything but vaccines. | ||
Feels all wrong. | ||
Why? | ||
There are so many better choices. | ||
And that is a point of speculation a lot of people have that what Casey Means has said a lot of great things. | ||
Health-wise, in the past, she has never come out against vaccines or vaccine mandates. | ||
If you want a woman that believes in 24-hour metabolic surveillance by AI and who has no tangible clinical experience and whose family has ties to the Rockefellers and who was silent as a church mouse in 2020, 21, 22, and 23, who has ties to the WEF, Gabby, Biden, Clinton, and who this is a Magamaha pick from heaven. | ||
No. | ||
No, I don't like it. | ||
He goes on. | ||
If you want a woman, so that's the one we just showed. | ||
That's the actual breakdown from a doctor who has actually been fighting the machine. | ||
Toby Rogers says this is a joke. | ||
He ripped the Surgeon General pick as a polished puppet from the establishment. | ||
He warned it's a move to repackage medical harm as health and called it a bad day for medical freedom. | ||
Called it a bad day for medical freedom. | ||
This is how you launder iatrogenicide, he said. | ||
Vinay Prasad is very weak at CBER. | ||
VRBPAC COVID vaccine strain selection meeting is still on, and now we get a CIA-McCIA Phase 2 as Surgeon General nominee. | ||
If you want to launder the iatrogenicide and make it look healthy, this is how you do it. | ||
And she has been silent on vaccines. | ||
Means wrote a book on metabolic dysfunction, but never mentioned the role of vaccines in that crisis. | ||
In 2024, when vax injuries were everywhere, that's not oversight, that's a cover-up. | ||
Toby Rogers at Utobian. | ||
Casey Means wrote a book on metabolic dysfunction called Good Energy, the Surprising Connection Between Metabolism and Limitless Health, and never mentioned the role of vaccines in causing metabolic dysfunction. | ||
That was in 2024, as COVID vaccines were destroying the health of Americans. | ||
Mike Adams, Health Ranger, warned. | ||
Saying, quote, Laura Loomer goes in saying, do you and your sister condemn your father? | ||
Do you, Callie Means, and Casey Means, condemn your father for writing a book encouraging children to be transgender? | ||
I don't want a Surgeon General that isn't capable of condemning their own family member for pushing child mutilation. | ||
Do you and your sister condemn your father? | ||
She points to this book written by their father called Felix the Flamingo where it talks about kids confused about gender and sexual identities as the main character Felix begins to discover that he's an unusual bird who's... | ||
Lost his way. | ||
A little bit troubling. | ||
Also, am I the only one that gets confused because Callie is a girl's name and Casey is a boy's name? | ||
Is that not a little bit confusing? | ||
Could there not be something at play here with their father being a proponent for transgenderism? | ||
The book Adventures of Felix the Flamingo explores gender dysphoria in children. | ||
That's by Grady Means, the father of Casey Means. | ||
Casey Means does not even have an active medical license in Oregon where she claims to practice. | ||
She allegedly never even completed her residency. | ||
The father of Casey Means wrote that book. | ||
Casey Means never supported Donald Trump. | ||
She doesn't even have an active medical license in Oregon where she says she's a doctor. | ||
She's also allegedly never completed her residency. | ||
Her father, Grady Means, authored a book titled The Adventures of Felix Flamingo. | ||
So again, Laura Loomer is on the case. | ||
Final warning, this is not just a bad pick. | ||
This is coordinated infiltration. | ||
The entire health freedom movement is rejecting her. | ||
Follow Next News Network for real-time updates as the backlash explodes. | ||
unidentified
|
and So that's not good. | |
So that's obviously not good. | ||
And it goes to show that no matter how successful we have been, and we have been hugely successful, especially in the information arena, they still very much... | ||
The elite very much still have control in the decisions being made at the highest levels of our government. | ||
And it is concerning that this person would be put forward as Surgeon General. | ||
When there's also so many other good picks, unless I'm missing something, I would think the Surgeon General of Florida might be a good option. | ||
Mary Bowden herself would be a good option. | ||
There are lots of good options, so why are we picking the person who seems to have so many strange connections and lacking so many prerequisites that one would need to do this? | ||
It's a little bit confusing. | ||
But, you know, it's like we get something good. | ||
We get something bad for every good thing we have with Trump, and that's just the way that it's been the entire time. | ||
Now we have some breaking news here that was just delivered. | ||
Representative Luna introduces legislation to repeal the Patriot Act. | ||
Today, U.S. Representative Anna Paulina Luna introduced the American Privacy Restoration Act. | ||
The legislation, if enacted, would fully repeal the U.S. Patriot Act, commonly referred to as just the Patriot Act. | ||
A sweeping post-9-11 law long criticized for enabling an unprecedented expansion of government surveillance. | ||
Quote, for two decades, rogue actors than our U.S. intelligence agencies have used the Patriot Act to create the most sophisticated, unaccountable surveillance apparatus in the Western world, said Congressman Luna. | ||
My legislation will strip the deep state of these tools and protect every American's Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. | ||
It's past time to rein in our intelligence agencies and restore the right to privacy. | ||
Anyone trying to convince you otherwise is using security. | ||
As an excuse to erode your freedom. | ||
The U.S. Patriot Act passed just over a month after the September 11th attacks granted federal agencies broad authority to collect personal data, conduct surveillance, and detain individuals with limited judicial oversight. | ||
Since being enacted, there have been numerous whistleblower reports of rampant abuse of Patriot Act powers by U.S. intelligence agencies. | ||
I've said it before and I'll say it again. | ||
If the government... | ||
Displayed itself as capable of wielding these powers for the benefit of the American people. | ||
It wouldn't be that big of an issue. | ||
It would still be an issue. | ||
It'd still be, you know, something we'd be concerned with. | ||
But it's like the same as we've seen with the border, as we've seen with a lot of stuff. | ||
There's rampant criminality in this country that goes totally unopposed. | ||
And it's not out of a lack of resources or the ability to put these policies into action. | ||
It's because the people that run our country genuinely oppose the American people and exclusively use the powers that they're granted against us. | ||
And we've got some examples of this exact thing here. | ||
Biden memo let feds target Americans for, quote, non-criminal behavior before Catholics and parents probed the situation. | ||
This is from the Pennsylvania Daily Star. | ||
The Biden administration authored federal law enforcement four years ago to target Americans engaged in, quote, concerning non-criminal behavior. | ||
In the name of fighting domestic terrorism, with a specific eye on those serving in the military, owning firearms, or spreading what officials consider to be xenophobic disinformation, according to new declassified documents. | ||
The stunning breadth of the mandate was disclosed when Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard recently released a fully unredacted version of the prior administration's strategic implementation plan for countering domestic terrorism, which, of course, we covered throughout. | ||
Trump, Biden's administration. | ||
The June 2021 memo exposed for the first time the law enforcement and intelligence framework that led to the FBI to monitor and probe Christian conservative Catholics and parents who protested against some school board policies and justified homeland security to engage in censorship or debanking of Americans with the administration considered to be potential enemies of the state. | ||
The directive provided to the Justice Department and FBI by the National Security Council, which developed the memo, said the agency should, quote, drive executive and legislative action to ban assault weapons in high capacity magazines, rein in ghost guns, monitor active duty service members for possible terrorism recruitment and mitigate xenophobia and bias. | ||
Thought crime. | ||
That's what that is. | ||
When you're mitigating xenophobia and bias, what you're describing is enforcing thought crime. | ||
Under a color of law application, going hand in hand with things like the U.S. Patriot Act. | ||
Again, if you could show me that by surveilling people in the way that they do, they were capturing every pedophile who shared images online, I'd say, hey, you know what? | ||
I don't like being monitored, but if it's between potentially having my information gathered by the NSA, but in exchange, Children go protected in a real and tangible way. | ||
I'm willing to talk. | ||
I'm willing to negotiate. | ||
I'm willing to hear out the justification for these measures. | ||
But every time, it's used exclusively against the American people. | ||
Every time these things go forward, the American people do not get any safer. | ||
We do not get any... | ||
More successful or anything positive whatsoever. | ||
It is instead employed entirely to uphold and serve the system whose only purpose seems to be to limit our behavior, our actions and our freedom. | ||
For decades, FBI agents have been required to meet stringent requirements for opening criminal and national security investigations known as a predicate. | ||
The predicate for a full investigation required in Now, I don't think I need to tell you that this activity, this behavior, this type of program did not go into place in June of 2021. | ||
After all, InfoWars for over a decade. | ||
Has been spied on by the FBI under claims that we are a domestic terrorist organization. | ||
Officially denoted in FBI classifications as a white supremacist terrorist organization. | ||
What's the predicate for that? | ||
They had to meet monthly to re-up that classification. | ||
I understand we do have Trump live. | ||
Now we'll get back to this story on the other side. | ||
It's a big one, though. | ||
Both of these stories, Annapolino Luna's repealing of the Patriot Act. | ||
It's about damn time. | ||
And then, of course, in association with that, the way that things like the Patriot Act have been used to exclusively target the American people for behavior explicitly allowed by the U.S. Constitution. | ||
Let's go now to Donald Trump talking what we expect to be about a trade deal. | ||
A tremendous trade deal for both countries. | ||
So I'm going to begin by just adding that we just concluded the rare earth deal with Ukraine. | ||
That's been fully ratified and approved by their legislative branches. | ||
And so we appreciate that. | ||
And I'll be speaking with the president in a little while, a little bit later. | ||
And we appreciate that. | ||
But the deal is all now signed up and ratified. | ||
And we have access to a massive amount of very, very high-quality rare earth. | ||
This morning, I'm thrilled to announce that we have reached a breakthrough trade deal with the United Kingdom, a credible country. | ||
Today is a victory day for World War II. | ||
We won the war together exactly 80 years ago, so there could be no more perfect... | ||
Morning to reach this historic agreement. | ||
And it's beautiful weather out, I will tell you that, Keir. | ||
Beautiful weather. | ||
It's so perfect outside. | ||
But it's really in particular the agreement with one of our closest and most cherished allies. | ||
And we're so happy that that's the way it worked out. | ||
I want to thank Prime Minister Starmer and his very talented team for their outstanding work and partnership. | ||
Today's agreement with the UK is the first in a series of agreements on trade that my administration has been negotiating over the past four weeks. | ||
With this deal, the UK joins the United States in affirming that reciprocity and fairness is an essential and vital principle of international trade. | ||
The deal includes billions of dollars of increased market access for American exports. | ||
Especially in agriculture, dramatically increasing access for American beef, ethanol, and virtually all of the products produced by our great farmers and our secretary, as you know, of agriculture is here, Brooke. | ||
Thank you very much for being here. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you, sir. | |
You'll let the farmers know. | ||
In addition, the UK will reduce or eliminate numerous non-tariff barriers that... | ||
Unfairly discriminated against American products, but this is now turning out, I think, really to be a great deal for both countries because it'll be really great for the UK also. | ||
So they're opening up the country. | ||
Their country is a little closed, and we appreciate that. | ||
They'll also be fast tracking American goods through their customs process. | ||
So our exports go to a very, very quick form of approval and there won't be any red tape. | ||
Things are going to move very quickly both ways. | ||
The final details are being written up in the coming weeks. | ||
We'll have it all very conclusive. | ||
But the actual deal is a very conclusive one. | ||
We think just about everything's been approved. | ||
So good for both countries. | ||
And we'll also receive new market access for American chemicals, machinery and many other industrial products that weren't allowed. | ||
And they'll end up getting products that they'll be able to price. | ||
Furthermore, in a historic step, the deal includes plans that will bring the United Kingdom into the economic security alignment with the United States. | ||
That's the first of its kind. | ||
So we have a big economic security blanket, and that's very important, and we feel very, very comfortable with that because it's been a great ally, truly one of our great allies. | ||
Our greatest ally. | ||
I don't want to insult people by saying that, but I can say it's certainly one of our greatest. | ||
And they're right at the top, and they're the first one we're talking about. | ||
And by the way, we have many meetings planned today and tomorrow, and every country wants to be making deals. | ||
And we have a meeting, as you know, Scott will be going over to Switzerland on Saturday, and that'll be very, very interesting. | ||
We'll find out. | ||
But I think they want to make a deal very badly, too. | ||
Both countries have agreed that the economic security is national security and we'll be working together as allies to ensure that we have a strong industrial base, appropriate export controls and protections for key technologies and industries like steel. | ||
Steel is a big factor. | ||
Both countries will become stronger with steel and things necessary for military. | ||
You know, we used to build ships and other things literally at a level that nobody's ever seen. | ||
We've eased up, and I would say that the UK certainly eased up, but now we're going to be uneasing both, and we work together. | ||
Once again, I want to thank Prime Minister Starmer. | ||
He's been terrific for his partnership in this matter, the special relationship and external bond. | ||
It's really an external and an internal bond between our two countries. | ||
We'll soon be stronger than ever before, and we really do. | ||
We have a great relationship. | ||
I want to just say that the representatives of the UK have been so professional. | ||
And it's been an honor doing business with all of them, and in particular, the Prime Minister. | ||
And I'd like to introduce him now to say a few words. | ||
Mr. Prime Minister, please take it away. | ||
We are live. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you, Mr. President Donald. | |
And this is a really fantastic, historic day in which we can announce this deal between our two great countries. | ||
is and I think it's a real tribute to the history that we have of working so closely together. | ||
Can I play through Thank you. | ||
Thank you. | ||
...deal today. | ||
Really important deal. | ||
This is going to boost trade between and across our countries. | ||
It's going to not only protect jobs but create jobs, opening market access. | ||
And as you say, Donald, the timing couldn't be more apt because not only was it 80 years ago today... | ||
Donald's victory came for Europe after and at the end of the Second World War. | ||
But of course, on that day, the UK and the US stood together as the closest of allies. | ||
And Donald, I think even down to the hour, because you may or may not know that it was about this time of day, exactly 80 years ago, that Winston Churchill announced. | ||
victory in Europe and that led to great celebrations across Europe, across America, but particularly in the United Kingdom. | ||
Literally people going out into the street, putting punting up, going up to the palace. | ||
We'll be right back more with this on the other side. | ||
We'll break down what we've heard. | ||
I think it's missing something. | ||
All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
Donald Trump is live from the Oval Office with Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of the UK, on speakerphone. | ||
We're going to go back to that here. | ||
We'll play it a little bit longer. | ||
What I haven't heard is any discussion about free speech. | ||
I was very, very excited for the prospect of America using its economic influence Beliefs be expressed by the countries that we do business with. | ||
And that was something that J.D. Vance and Donald Trump hinted at. | ||
Said that, you know, it was going to be an aspect of the negotiations. | ||
You've got to stop being ridiculous tyrants and throwing your people in jail for memes if you want to do business with the free speech country. | ||
I haven't heard anything about that yet. | ||
I'm a little disappointed in that regard. | ||
But of course... | ||
Stocks are very up, and this is the first of hopefully many agreements with many different countries seeking parity on the tariff front. | ||
Let's go back to this live broadcast of Trump and Keir Starmer. | ||
unidentified
|
Standing side by side, I think, is incredibly important and makes this truly historic. | |
That close relationship has endured over those 80 years. | ||
As you know, Donald, when it comes to defence and security and intelligence sharing, of course, there are no two countries that are closer than our two countries. | ||
And now we take this into new and important territory by adding trade and the economy to the closeness of our relationship. | ||
It is built, as you say, on those notions of fairness. | ||
And reciprocal arrangements. | ||
We've always had a fair and balanced arrangement between our countries. | ||
This builds on that. | ||
Hugely important for sectors like car manufacturing and for steel and aluminium and so many others. | ||
And yes, we can finish hunting out some of the details, but there's a plan. | ||
Fantastic platform here, including, of course, on the tech side, where I think I'm right in saying we're the only two Western countries with trillion-dollar sectors when it comes to tech. | ||
And in the end, it comes down to, as you say, Donald, economic security is national security. | ||
On national security, we've been absolutely the closest of allies for so many years, keeping the peace through that close alliance, that friendship. | ||
And now we add to that, this deal on trade and the economy. | ||
And I want to thank you for your leadership on that, Donald, and for the way in which your team have negotiated this. | ||
I'm so pleased that we've got this deal, we've finalised it, and we've built an incredible platform for the future. | ||
So thank you so much. | ||
Donald, I'm now going to go and do a press conference. | ||
I think you have your press in with you. | ||
But on the details, I think if you've got Howard, we can deal with that through one of my team. | ||
That's great. | ||
Well, Mr. Prime Minister, thank you very much. | ||
It's an honour. | ||
We're going to have a continued, maybe a better relationship than ever before. | ||
You know, I don't know if the media knows, but the US and UK have been working for years. | ||
To try and make a deal. | ||
And it never quite got there. | ||
It did with this prime minister. | ||
So I want to just congratulate you. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, with this president, this prime minister, we've managed to achieve what many people have tried to achieve for many years. | |
That's right. | ||
And I'm really pleased. | ||
And it feels completely historic and on a special 80-year anniversary as well. | ||
So, Donald, thank you so much. | ||
It's really good to have got this deal over the line. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Well, it really is a great thing. | ||
And you go do your press conference, and I'll see you soon. | ||
Maybe speak to you later. | ||
But thank you very much. | ||
An incredible thing. | ||
I can't tell you that for so many years, even as I sat, everybody talked and talked and talked about a deal. | ||
It just seemed like a natural deal, but it was not done, but now it was done with us. | ||
So I feel very proud to have been a part of it. | ||
Keir, thank you very much. | ||
unidentified
|
Thanks, Donald, and we'll speak again soon. | |
Very good. | ||
So long. | ||
unidentified
|
Bye. | |
All right. | ||
There you go. | ||
The first bilateral agreement of the tariff war U.S.-U.K. | ||
trade deal has been reached. | ||
Although I still haven't heard anything about free speech, which is sort of disappointing. | ||
Thank you. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
All right, welcome back. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, this is The American Journal. | ||
I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
unidentified
|
I just was dropped a... | |
A breaking alert. | ||
A two-day sale that's on today, Thursday, May 8th, and tomorrow, Friday, May 9th. | ||
Any customer who orders two or more bottles of Methyl& Blue from TheAlexJonesStore.com will get an additional bottle for free. | ||
So if you wanted to try Methyl& Blue or you've tried it and loved it and want to stock up, now is the time. | ||
Get two bottles of Methyl& Blue from TheAlexJonesStore.com and get a third for free. | ||
It is incredibly powerful, an incredibly powerful supplement. | ||
And I'll just say, it's powerful enough that I have to warn you. | ||
You know, ask your doctor. | ||
Make sure it's right for you, because it's not for the faint of heart, let's just say. | ||
But if you are the type of person that needs it, it is probably going to change your life. | ||
So try it today. | ||
Methyl and blue, ultra-methyl and blue at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
Buy two, get one free. | ||
It's like a firework sale. | ||
Thealexjonesstore.com, and of course it keeps us on the air and in the fight. | ||
Now, I want to go to a video here, TikTok video. | ||
Pretty troubling series of events here. | ||
It's a woman who had some questions, did a little bit of research. | ||
And I wonder if what she uncovered is a crime of some sort. | ||
You'll see what I mean. | ||
Apparently, the Hallmark store is handing out price sheets to its customers explaining how tariffs have caused their prices to rise. | ||
There's a little bit of a problem with that, though. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
Hallmark is raising all of their prices because of tariffs. | |
Now hear me out. | ||
I just left the Hallmark store with the ornaments and all that, right? | ||
I love them. | ||
I've been going on them for years. | ||
Like many of you collect ornaments and so I'm not trying to make a mountain out of a mohu. | ||
But what I just found out is a little concerning to me. | ||
I mean, I have some questions. | ||
So I'm checking out, right? | ||
Buying, you know, Mother's Day cards and and I see the the ornament look. | ||
I'm like, oh my God. | ||
Yeah, the ornament book. | ||
I was like, are these free? | ||
Can I take one? | ||
And she was like, yes. | ||
And I was like, okay, cool. | ||
And I was like, you also have to take this. | ||
I said, what do you mean? | ||
She said, this is the updated price list because the ornament book came out and they had to do price adjustments. | ||
So these are the new pricing. | ||
So this is... | ||
This is a generic list, right? | ||
So if something was $149.99, it should have said it's $164.99. | ||
And I said, what's going on with the prices? | ||
And she's handing it to me, and she said it's because of the tariffs. | ||
And I said, oh, okay. | ||
So I get into the car, and I'm thinking to myself, I was like, a tariff is like a tax. | ||
On imported goods from outside of the country. | ||
So I Google where Hallmark manufacturers are from. | ||
And it said Kansas, which is in the United States. | ||
And I was like, okay. | ||
So then I call Hallmark. | ||
I said, hey, where do you guys make your ornaments and your cards and all your stuff? | ||
And she goes, the majority of our things, to my knowledge, are made in Kansas. | ||
Everything is here made in the United States. | ||
Okay, I was like, is there anything that's made outside of the United States? | ||
She goes, to my knowledge, no. | ||
And I said, okay. | ||
She goes, we do maybe pick a design or something that we purchase from someone outside of the United States. | ||
But to my knowledge, everything is made right here in the United States. | ||
I said, okay, so why are you guys raising the prices? | ||
And not just on some items, right? | ||
Like, if you had, like, one or two items. | ||
That are made and manufactured in other countries and have it shipped here. | ||
Okay, cool. | ||
Tariffs are probably going to affect that and you raise the prices. | ||
Okay, whatever. | ||
This is a generic list for everything. | ||
It doesn't... | ||
So you see what I'm saying? | ||
It's not making sense to me at all. | ||
So she said, listen, I don't have... | ||
They told me to tell you guys it is because of the climate. | ||
Let me get the list. | ||
Hold on, let me get the word. | ||
She calls it an economic climate. | ||
And I said, okay, I get that. | ||
But that's still not answering my question on why we're raising the prices on things that have nothing to do with... | ||
Goods coming from outside of the United States. | ||
She said, if you want, I can email my supervisor, pass this information to them, and then, you know, they can email you back. | ||
I said, okay, you know, that'll be great. | ||
So they did that, and then at 1.55 p.m., like this is all happening now, I get an email from Hallmark. | ||
She said, the dream book printed early. | ||
The full impact of the tariffs were unknown at the time of print. | ||
The recent tariffs had had an impact on Hallmark's cost, leading to these changes. | ||
We still have hundreds of amazing ornaments and would be thrilled to help you find what you're looking for. | ||
So I wrote back. | ||
That's not answering my question. | ||
I said, I understand that, but my question is, why are you raising all of the prices? | ||
To my understanding, the manufacturers here in the United States, so why are the American-made ornaments also raising in prices? | ||
And also, is there any ornaments made in China or outside the U.S.? | ||
Because per your employee, everything, to our knowledge, is made here. | ||
So how are the tariffs affecting what's made here? | ||
Again, if this list said, like... | ||
The prices manufactured from China are going to be going up $5. | ||
You know what I mean? | ||
If it had more clarification, but it doesn't. | ||
This is just a generic list. | ||
Everything is being affected. | ||
So I don't understand. | ||
So after I sent that email, I didn't get one back yet. | ||
So again, I'm not trying to make a mountain out of a molehill here. | ||
I just think it's a little sh**. | ||
Because everyone's going to look at Trump, and I'm not trying to stand up for Trump, and I'm not trying to attack Trump whatsoever. | ||
But, you know, I think everyone's going to be jumping on this bandwagon where these companies are just going to blame Trump and take advantage of a situation just like they did with COVID. | ||
There's no reason to put tariffs on American-made items. | ||
You see what I'm saying? | ||
So for them just to jump on the bandwagon and then turn around and blame the administration is ridiculous. | ||
It's a lie. | ||
It's absolutely ridiculous. | ||
We can take it down. | ||
So that's from Prevent and Limit on TikTok. | ||
Now, I think that's a very big deal. | ||
I think that's a huge deal. | ||
I can't help but think that that has to be considered some sort of in-kind donation to the Democratic Party. | ||
You've got the Hallmark Corporation that apparently makes everything in America claiming that they're raising prices because of Trump's tariffs and giving to all of their customers a sheet that says, here's our price increases that are happening because of Trump's tariffs. | ||
That is actual disinformation. | ||
And you're probably going to see a lot of other companies do that, either Like, the fact that they would state it almost makes it more suspicious. | ||
But I guarantee you, you're going to see companies across the board, and this is the crazy thing. | ||
All through the inflation crisis that Biden presided over, how many times did you hear phrases about corporate greed and that inflation wasn't real, it was just corporations are making... | ||
Record profit. | ||
Well, if you have a company like Hallmark that makes everything in the U.S., is not being affected by the tariffs, but they're raising their prices as if they are affected by the tariffs, where's that extra money going? | ||
It's not going to tariffs. | ||
It's not actually, the idea is that, okay, companies that are set by tariffs have to raise up their costs. | ||
But really, they're just staying at zero, right? | ||
Because they're raising their costs to meet the tariff demand. | ||
But if that's not the case, then where's that extra money going? | ||
So again, you have this example of the left completely projecting what they actually do. | ||
Corporations were not to blame for the inflation crisis. | ||
The government was. | ||
Constantly claimed that actually they were fighting against corporate greed and that's why your prices were going up. | ||
And they're the good guys. | ||
These corporations are just blaming inflation to raise their prices and pocket all the money. | ||
That's literally what's happening here. | ||
They're raising their prices, they're pointing at Trump saying this is his fault, he put tariffs on us, and then they're just pocketing that money. | ||
Screwing you over, raising your prices dishonestly, and trying to weaponize it. | ||
Against Trump politically to convince people that the reason things are more expensive is because of tariffs. | ||
Now, if Hallmark is doing this and printing out sheets saying this, how many corporations do you think will just quietly raise their prices and just go, hey, people are going to assume it's because of the tariffs. | ||
They aren't going to blame us for raising the prices. | ||
They're going to blame Trump for the tariffs, even though the tariffs don't apply to us. | ||
This is actually massively undercutting the entire point of the tariffs. | ||
The entire point of the tariffs is to benefit American companies, benefit companies that make things in America. | ||
Hallmark is screwing themselves over in this regard. | ||
As we've explained a million times, if you go to buy a car, they were the same price, but one was made in America and one wasn't. | ||
So now, the one that wasn't made in America is $10,000 more expensive, you're going to go for the American-made car. | ||
So repeat that 10 million times. | ||
And the companies that make American goods are going to get a massively greater share of the business than they would otherwise. | ||
Because they're going to be able to offer American-made products for as cheap or cheaper than the foreign-made products. | ||
So the more people that, so just take an example, let's say Toyotas are made in America, Fords are made in Mexico. | ||
Well, if everybody goes to buy a car and there's two similar cars and the Toyota one's $10,000 cheaper, That's going to be a big sell to a lot of people. | ||
Maybe 30-50% of the people are going to choose the Toyota on the basis of that price difference. | ||
And so then Toyota is going to get a 30-50% greater share of the market. | ||
More money is going to go into Toyota. | ||
They're going to be able to expand their operations in America. | ||
That's how you bring back manufacturing, by benefiting and driving customers towards the people that make things in America. | ||
Enriching the companies that are in America, encouraging them to manufacture more, and of course, putting the onus on, in that case, Ford to bring their manufacturing back in order to be able to offer their prices, be able to offer their cars at the competitive prices. | ||
So by not taking advantage of that, where Hallmark could say, hey, our competitors selling you cheap Chinese crap. | ||
Their prices are going up, not ours. | ||
We're made in America. | ||
So if you want an affordable gift card, come to us. | ||
Or a birthday card, come to us. | ||
So they're screwing themselves over by not taking advantage of the advantage they have in pricing. | ||
They're lying to their customers and pocketing the difference, raising prices when they don't need to. | ||
And blaming Trump and telling their customers this is Trump's fault that everything in our store is more expensive when everything in their store is made in America and not subject to the tariffs. | ||
A blatant lie. | ||
I don't see how there's not a criminal investigation into this of some sort. | ||
Again, if it's just framed as an in-kind contribution from Hallmark, clearly they're going out of their way, print stuff out, This took organization and resources to do this. | ||
That is, I mean, can you tell me another reason why they would do this if it wasn't strictly political? | ||
There they have the pillars. | ||
Was this, now it's this. | ||
Showing how the price increases. | ||
None of that's because of tariffs. | ||
And what does it say at the top there? | ||
I can't quite read it. | ||
Prices reflected in the dream book are now inaccurate. | ||
chart below reflects the new prices effective may 2nd 2025 you Thank you. | ||
Are they explicitly blaming the tariffs on that? | ||
Is the question. | ||
She seemed to say that they were. | ||
So again, it's like, okay. | ||
Hopefully this is just another aspect of the awakening. | ||
Hopefully people like that, and you can even hear her, she's like, I'm not trying to defend Trump. | ||
And it's like, well, maybe you should be. | ||
Maybe it's okay to defend Trump. | ||
Maybe it's okay to tell the truth. | ||
Maybe if you really think about it, you'll ask yourself, why is this corporation screwing me over? | ||
So here's the thing. | ||
Hallmark's dedication to help you celebrate life's meaningful moments remains our focus, especially as we look forward towards the holidays. | ||
We are committed to maintaining our pricing across various product lines that are fortunate to manufacture 75% of our products in our Kansas-based manufacturing facilities. | ||
Some categories, like ornaments, are disproportionately impacted by current economic climate. | ||
As a result, we've made the necessary decision to adjust pricing of our Keepsake Ornament product line effective Friday, May 2nd. | ||
Wishlist submissions starting tomorrow will be able to browse the full 2025 Keepsake Ornament collection. | ||
Hallmark.com. | ||
unidentified
|
Hallmark.com. | |
So I don't know. | ||
If that's all they're doing, then I guess that's fine. | ||
If all they're raising their prices on is just the ornaments made in China, then that actually does make sense. | ||
But according to that woman, that was not what was being expressed. | ||
And she seemed to get the message that everything was going up across the board and everything in the store was having their price raised and it was being blamed directly on the tariffs. | ||
Which, if that's the case, that's a problem. | ||
That's a giant problem. | ||
Now, I'm actually going to open up phone lines in the last segment of today's show. | ||
But I want to ask about one specific topic and get the audience to read on this topic. | ||
We've barely touched on it. | ||
It's been slowly but surely gaining steam. | ||
Now it's like a very prominent conversation. | ||
I want to know what the InfoWars audience feels about the phrase woke right. | ||
So I'm going to open up the calls, open up the lines for your calls to answer this question. | ||
What do you think about the woke right? | ||
What is the woke right? | ||
Do you think this is a valid label to put on people? | ||
Do you think it's a good thing, a bad thing? | ||
Do you even understand what it... | ||
They're even saying, I want to know what you think about the woke right. | ||
So give us a call, 1-877-789-2539. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
Give us a call at the American Journal about the woke right controversy. | ||
I'm pretty sure I am woke right. | ||
James Lindsay has been the prominent voice. | ||
Popularizing this phrase. | ||
And he directly called me woke right, so I think I've been anointed as woke right by the progenitor of that concept. | ||
But don't let that sway your, influence your opinion of it. | ||
I want your raw, unfiltered expression of what the hell woke right is, why it's being used, what purpose does it have. | ||
It's a very big... | ||
Big part of the online conversation right now. | ||
But I want to go to one more video before we go to break, and we'll come back with that final segment in your phone calls. | ||
Let's go to clip number five here. | ||
This is FBI Director Kash Patel absolutely torching former Trump impeachment manager, Democrat Representative Madeline Dean. | ||
Right to her face. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
Agency. | |
I was an impeachment manager for President Trump's second impeachment. | ||
It was a sad, solemn duty. | ||
And so I wanted to ask you about that. | ||
Mr. Patel, as you and the President continue to weaponize and investigate his perceived enemies, as you follow this blueprint, when can I, a former impeachment manager, expect the FBI at my door? | ||
Ma 'am, you want to know who was targeted by a weaponized FBI? | ||
Me. | ||
You want to know how and why? | ||
You want to know what I'm doing to fix it? | ||
Let me move on. | ||
Well, you should read the book because there's no enemies list on that book. | ||
There are people that violated their constitutional obligations and their duties to the American people, and they were rightly called out. | ||
And you should give that book to every one of your constituents so they can read about it. | ||
I won't be doing that. | ||
That's their loss. | ||
During your Senate confirmation hearings... | ||
You repeatedly denied having any involvement as a private citizen in the firing of FBI officials who engaged in the prosecution against January 6th insurrectionists. | ||
The violent rioters who beat and killed Capitol Police officers and whom you refer to as political prisoners. | ||
Since then, multiple whistleblowers have come forward and we know that you likely committed perjury. | ||
At the same hearing, you claimed you were not familiar with Stu Peters. | ||
An anti-Semitic Holocaust denier. | ||
Despite the fact that you appeared on Mr. Peter's podcast eight separate times. | ||
Eight times. | ||
And you claimed not to recall. | ||
Mr. Patel, my second question is, should we worry more about your memory or your veracity? | ||
We should worry more about your lack of candor. | ||
You're excusing me of committing cojury. | ||
Tell the American people how I broke the law and committed a felony. | ||
Have the audacity to actually put the facts forward instead of lying for political banter so you can have a 20-second donation hit. | ||
The answer is both. | ||
The answer is you're failing, not me. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
Mr. Patel, I believe that the members of the FBI, and I know many of them, many retired, 38,000 people, as you say, it's a little less than that now, deserve the very best, deserve extraordinary independence. | ||
Wait, wait. | ||
They have the freedom? | ||
Wait, what? | ||
Free of the fear of being investigated? | ||
Not if you commit crimes. | ||
What are you talking about? | ||
They should be free from the fear of being investigated. | ||
No. | ||
What? | ||
Oh my god. | ||
These people, man. | ||
These people. | ||
Good on Kash Patel for laying down the law there. | ||
And that's all that happened. | ||
Laying down the law. | ||
And that really is as ridiculous as it sounds. | ||
I mean, you've got... | ||
You just imagine like having a warrant list and you go to the cop and go, is this your list of enemies? | ||
It's like, no, it's a list of people who broke the law. | ||
You mean your enemies? | ||
You mean the people that you're claiming are undermining your attempt to take over this country? | ||
And it's like, no, they broke the law, lady. | ||
What do you not understand about that? | ||
Nobody has a right to remain uninvestigated when they break the law. | ||
Even and especially if they have a position of power and authority in the federal government or federal law enforcement. | ||
They should actually be under stricter surveillance and investigation because they have the ability to do things that regular people don't have and powers that they can abuse that regular people don't have access to. | ||
So just reject their framing. | ||
Keep driving forward. | ||
Good to see Kash Patel hasn't lost any of the fire. | ||
At least apparently. | ||
We'll be right back with your calls. | ||
unidentified
|
Putting the power of conversation into the caller's hands. | |
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Alright, welcome back folks. | ||
Final segment of The American Journal. | ||
We'll go out to your phone calls momentarily. | ||
We've got the crew. | ||
Sean has been watching the... | ||
Press conference about the UK trade deal. | ||
Apparently a reporter did ask about the free speech provisions and was told that was not part of this deal. | ||
So that's been confirmed. | ||
Pretty disappointing. | ||
But I guess it's a little too much to ask for. | ||
Now, I just played a video and celebrated Kash Patel for, you know, not changing his tune when it comes to the Political activities of the FBI and the political motivations of criminal charges. | ||
Then another video got posted of his questioning by Senator Kennedy this time. | ||
And I don't have quite the sanguine reaction to this clip. | ||
Here's another clip of Cash Mattel at this Senate hearing. | ||
unidentified
|
A person with a brain and a beating heart? | |
Yes, sir. | ||
Did Jeffrey Epstein hang himself or did somebody kill him? | ||
unidentified
|
Senator, I believe he hung himself in a cell in the Metropolitan Tension Center. | |
Are you going to release all the information about that? | ||
Senator, we are working through that right now with the Department of Justice. | ||
When do you think you'll have it done, Cash? | ||
I think in the near future, sir. | ||
Like before I die? | ||
Senator, we've been working on that, and we're doing it in a way that protects victims and also doesn't put out into the ether information that is irrelevant for production of the public, such as CSAM. | ||
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | ||
unidentified
|
Senator Reid. | |
So that's extremely disappointing. | ||
Kash Patel saying Jeffrey Epstein killed himself. | ||
Great. | ||
Great. | ||
It's Kash Patel like, well, I don't want to kill myself, so I'm going to say he killed himself. | ||
He's like, you're asking me about people who have the capability of killing a man when he's in federal custody. | ||
And getting away scot-free. | ||
I'm going to say he killed himself. | ||
I don't even agree with Senator Kennedy's framing of the question. | ||
Did he hang himself or was he killed? | ||
I think he's still alive. | ||
I don't think he was killed in the first place, so wrap your mind around that one. | ||
Out to your calls now. | ||
Well, we've got a few more videos, or articles rather, just dropped off. | ||
Breaking news here. | ||
FBI opens formal investigation into NY Attorney General Letitia James. | ||
The FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office in Albany have now opened a formal criminal complaint examining the real estate and mortgage transactions of New York Attorney General Letitia James, according to law enforcement sources briefed on the matter. | ||
it's unclear why U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi steered the referral to New York's Northern District although James is a statewide elected official with offices in Albany. | ||
The transactions involve her personal property purchases and loans that were processed in New York City and Virginia. | ||
Some of the transactions may fall outside of the federal statute of limitations although one of her mortgages involves James's assertion in loan documents related to her 2023 purchase of a resident's James has cast the allegations as baseless, but they are in fact undeniable. | ||
We've been over it before. | ||
Long story short, she did what she accused President Trump of doing. | ||
She accused President Trump of falsifying the cost, the price of property in order to get more lenient loans, using it as collateral, basically falsifying documents in order to get a better rate on a loan from a bank. | ||
Now that charge is totally baseless nonsense, totally untrue. | ||
However, Letitia James has been involved in that exact type of fraud and scam. | ||
She bought a house in Virginia, and in order to get a better loan and a cheaper loan on that property, she said it was going to be her primary residence, and she was going to live in Virginia at the time she was purchasing the house. | ||
So either she was lying about that in order to get a better rate on her loans, exactly what she accused Trump of, She's either guilty of that, or she was not lying on those forms. | ||
She really was intending, or is intending, or is, considering Virginia her primary residence, in which case, she is no longer the Attorney General of New York. | ||
Because according to the New York Constitution, if the Attorney General, New York, moves out of New York, the office is vacated. | ||
There's no process, there's no ceremony, it's just, there's no Attorney General now. | ||
Like, they died if they move out of state. | ||
So, there's really, like, she committed one crime or another. | ||
But she can't have both. | ||
It can't be both. | ||
So, that's very big, and that'll be a big deal. | ||
Unfortunately for the people of New York, they'll be footing the bill. | ||
Albany sneaks in budget language that would put New York taxpayers on the hook for Tish James'legal bills if she's probed by Trump admin. | ||
Taxpayers could be on the hook for New York Attorney General Letitia James'legal bills during Justice Department probes into her alleged fraudulent real estate dealings, the Post has learned. | ||
Albany Democrats are expected to sign off on a provision allowing for certain officials to tap into a $10 million fund to cover, quote, any reasonable attorney's fees and expenses incurred, even as part of probes not directly related to their state and The language being slipped into New York's Operation Budget Bill. | ||
One of several expected to be made public and voted on starting Wednesday as the legislature moves to pass next year's financial plan. | ||
So, good for her. | ||
It's a legal bailout for James. | ||
New York Republican State Committee Chairman Ed Cox calls it an outrageous abuse of power and a slap in the face to every New Yorker. | ||
But that's what corruption does, doesn't it? | ||
One abuse of power begets another. | ||
But hey, the good news for Tish James. | ||
She's got a new bronze statue in Times Square, so at least she has that to go on. | ||
Finally, we have this House passes GOP-led bill to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America. | ||
The House has passed a Republican-led bill to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, moving it a step closer to codifying President Donald Trump's push to rename the body of water. | ||
So this has passed. | ||
I guess it goes to the Senate now. | ||
And it's funny, the criticisms of this... | ||
Is they're just like, we just don't want to. | ||
Why are we doing this? | ||
We just don't like it. | ||
Like, okay, well, shut up. | ||
Shut up, who cares? | ||
We're naming a goal from America. | ||
It's funny and cool, so we're doing it. | ||
Those are the latest breaking news stories here. | ||
We go out to your phone calls now about Woke Right. | ||
And this label has been spread primarily by James Lindsay, the likes of Jordan Peterson, Hopping on the bandwagon. | ||
And long story short, they can try to frame it any way they want. | ||
They can try to whatever. | ||
It's basically people on the right that aren't racial cucks or religious cucks. | ||
It's people who don't hesitate or don't shy away from the obvious and overwhelming influence of identity on modern politics. | ||
And really, most of it, I think, is predicated on anti-Semitism, and it's basically saying if you're right-wing, but you don't love Israel, you're woke right. | ||
That's a fairly accurate working definition if you're looking for one. | ||
And of course, this is always framed as we're protecting the right from the pernicious influence of identity politics. | ||
We're the real right-wingers, those woke righties. | ||
They're the frauds. | ||
They're the fakes. | ||
Which is interesting because somehow this... | ||
Deeply conservative messaging has been adopted wholesale by the left as an attack on the right. | ||
As Jack Posobiec lays out, here's a clearly coordinated subversion. | ||
There is a clearly coordinated subversion effort by the so-called centrist and the left to astroturf the nonsensical phrase woke right into the lexicon. | ||
And now the Atlantic, mouthpiece of a globalist, is platforming it. | ||
We can all see what's going on here. | ||
The Atlantic has a story called the godfather of the woke right. | ||
A 2011 book by Pat Buchanan shows the deep roots of today's right-wing illiberalism. | ||
So yes, the conservative James Lindsay, his phrase, shockingly, has been adopted as just a straight-up attack on the right-wing. | ||
So I want to hear your thoughts on this. | ||
We haven't talked too much about it because I really don't think it's... | ||
Up to now, at least, that has not been worth even getting into this argument, really. | ||
But let's go to Eric in Texas first, on Line 7, The Woke Right. | ||
What are your thoughts on this? | ||
unidentified
|
You know, Harrison, Solomon said that there's nothing new that men do under the sun. | |
And the Nazi from Ukraine, Zelensky, he said, peoples is peoples. | ||
Okay? | ||
unidentified
|
Mental illness is something that is inherent in the human condition. | |
Wokeism, tribalism, putting people in camps. | ||
The chosen children of God got to the point where they were sacrificing their children to Molech. | ||
LBJ had the USS Liberty sunk. | ||
To help Israel. | ||
Okay? | ||
And Israel complied with that operation quite happily. | ||
Okay? | ||
This is borne out in our prison systems. | ||
Prison wardens will have whites fighting blacks, Hispanics fighting everybody, Chinese fighting everybody. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
It's like as I talked about yesterday with the partition of Pakistan, India. | ||
I mean, Pakistan, India, Northern Ireland, Ireland. | ||
Israel, Pakistan, all of these are the outcome of deliberate policy by the British to... | ||
unidentified
|
It's all for control. | |
100%. | ||
You want people fighting against each other. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, because if they're fighting against each other... | |
But relate this back to the woke right, because I want to get some other people's statements. | ||
So, the woke right, a good label, a bad label, I mean, what's your take on this? | ||
unidentified
|
I think it's a bad label. | |
I mean, people with common sense... | ||
That know when someone's doing wrong and don't support it, you know? | ||
I mean, I don't support Israel blindly, okay? | ||
But I don't condemn them blindly either. | ||
That would make me a Muslim, okay? | ||
Secondly, the only thing you can do with stupid is muffle it with duct tape and bury it in the backyard. | ||
You can't fix it, okay? | ||
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. | ||
You're exactly right. | ||
Thank you, Eric. | ||
I get what you're saying. | ||
I think I agree with you. | ||
And that is the thing. | ||
They want to act like you have to be woke to just notice that Israel is committing a bunch of war crimes or white people are discriminated against in this country, and that's a bad thing. | ||
If you have principles, you can just confront these things and deal with them. | ||
If everything is an amalgamation of who's involved and what's their identity and how's this, it's like, no, the fact is, I don't like discrimination. | ||
And if it was happening to non-white people, I'd be against that. | ||
It's not. | ||
It's happening to white people, so I'm against that. | ||
You can say that makes me a sucker for identity politics, but it actually just makes me consistent in my anti-discrimination beliefs. | ||
And I think that's related to what Eric is saying. | ||
James in Oregon has called in about this term. | ||
What do you think about woke right, James? | ||
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
I'm pretty sure it came up in a think tank and they just decided they were going to use it as a term to segregate those in the populist movement and keep us in a form of disarray so that we can infight, when the reality is we, the populist, know that we are Americans and we are fighting for not only our freedom, but for the world's freedom and to be... | ||
I think you're exactly right. | ||
And in fact, that was actually the exchange I had with James Lindsay on X. I'll pull up what we were saying to each other, but I was making the exact point you were. | ||
He was saying, these people who are against Israel, I can't remember what he was saying, but he was like, they're trying to divide us. | ||
And my point was, You came up with the term woke right. | ||
The entire point of that term existing is to divide the right. | ||
It is, by definition, a divisive phrase to be putting forward. | ||
So it's complete projection. | ||
This person who came out of nowhere to decide half of the right wing is woke and therefore not allowed, and he's predicating that on stopping division. | ||
Literally, it is the only outcome of the woke right concept is to divide the right. | ||
I completely agree. | ||
I think it's a divide-and-conquer tactic, personally. | ||
Again, I don't want... | ||
Hey, people say, look, the woke ride is bad. | ||
I want to hear that, too. | ||
So let's go to Zachary, and then we'll go to Tim and Tuvia if we can get to you. | ||
Let's go to Zachary first. | ||
Thank you very much for the call, James. | ||
Zachary, what's your take on the woke ride? | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, everything. | |
Can you hear me? | ||
Yes, sir. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, sounds like... | |
Kind of everybody already agrees with what I'm about to say, but I disagree with it. | ||
I think it's bad for a couple of reasons, mainly because I think if you try to extend yourself in the future with it, I mean, it kind of just goes down the road of identity politics, and like you're saying, it's just a dividing conquer tactic. | ||
But I would also say that we just really got to remember why we call ourselves conservatives in the first place. | ||
It doesn't matter what we call ourselves. | ||
We just got to stand up and be patriots and do what's right. | ||
Amen. | ||
I can buy completely agree. | ||
See, yeah, it's divisive. | ||
It's a slippery slope. | ||
I think that's what most people I follow agree with that. | ||
There's really just a very small subsection of people who are trying to push this concept of woke right at all. | ||
Thanks for the call, Zachary. | ||
Tim in the United States has called in about this topic as well. | ||
Go ahead, Tim. | ||
You're on the air about the woke right. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, Harrison. | |
Didn't Albert Pike write about Israel in World War III back in the 1800s? | ||
I believe so, yeah. | ||
The three-part war. | ||
unidentified
|
And hasn't humanity been under, let's just say, a thousand percent psyops since the oligarchy kind of took power? | |
I would say so. | ||
unidentified
|
So it kind of seems as if we're being led astray. | |
We had the momentum a few years back, but now we're just constantly concentrating on the differences of others. | ||
And I think it's completely weaponized. | ||
And I think that there are PR campaigns coming through with influencers. | ||
Spouting all kinds of controversial stuff just for takes, just for the low IQ people to just gravitate towards, magnetize themselves to it, and it's just becoming this big echo chamber. | ||
It's not doing anybody any good. | ||
It's not just about the Israelis or the Jews, blacks, everybody. | ||
It seems as if the right wing is just trying to divide itself into this faction of people that just want pure white skin. | ||
Nothing but, you know, cathedrals everywhere and, what, machine gun turrets on all corners because that's the only way you're really going to get this fantasy that everybody's trying to reclaim. | ||
They've raised us in psyops to hate each other. | ||
They've raised us on all sides, not just Christians and Muslims and Jews. | ||
They've raised everybody to hate each other. | ||
And to me, falling prey to that is the biggest, you know, I... | ||
I just do my best to stay away from it. | ||
I think it's dangerous to focus on the differences of others instead of the common ground. | ||
We're all chemtrailed. | ||
We're all being vaccinated at a certain point. | ||
I mean, everybody's got vaccine damage. | ||
I'm pretty sure you got your school shots just like everybody else did in Chicago, right? | ||
All of us have been put to fight each other. | ||
And so the power structure just stays scot-free. | ||
Nothing's ever going to touch them as long as we fight amongst each other. | ||
We're just fighting other Americans at this point. | ||
So it really defeats our purposes. | ||
It really defeats the momentum. | ||
It's just, yeah, it's all styops and we're falling for it. | ||
Okay, so I get that point of view. | ||
I would just say I don't think it's as simple as that, I guess I would say. | ||
But it is. | ||
Okay, but it is. | ||
Is defending white people against attacks against white people not something that should be done? | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
You should protect your culture and everything like that, but if you are adopting the terms of the left by saying you're white, because that's their term. | ||
If you've already picked a side instead of saying you're an American. | ||
This is what I don't like. | ||
What side did I pick? | ||
unidentified
|
By claiming that you're defending white culture, you're just dog-whistling to everybody else that thinks that you're going to help them in their crusade against everybody else. | |
I didn't say white culture. | ||
I said white people. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
So, alright. | ||
And if I have exactly the same stance about defending black culture, what then? | ||
unidentified
|
But you kind of don't. | |
And if you do, then, well... | ||
You should kind of focus on that more, like bridge building. | ||
I mean, you should have hot step juices on. | ||
Are black people faced with the same discrimination or outright hatred that white people are faced with in this country? | ||
unidentified
|
Currently? | |
Probably not as much as you would think that white people are, but I would say that we're all trauma-based mind control victims. | ||
No, I'm not falling for trauma-based mind control. | ||
We should. | ||
No, the trauma-based mind control is the mind control that has people hating their own race because of something that happened 80 years ago and that they've been traumatized into believing was an outcome of white people not embracing diversity. | ||
So the PSYOP is getting white people to think that they deserve punishment for the success of their ancestors. | ||
That's the... | ||
What I'm saying is that the dichotomy and the mind control is when an authority, when somebody from the government or something comes out and says, we're not hiring white guys anymore. | ||
We're not going to do that. | ||
There's too many white people here. | ||
And you say, hey, that's wrong. | ||
That's bad. | ||
That you shouldn't be saying that. | ||
Then your response to me was you've picked a side and you're falling for a trap. | ||
By defending white people. | ||
My point is, if it was happening to black people, I'd also be defending them. | ||
It's not, though. | ||
So it's not my fault. | ||
I'm not choosing the white side over the black side. | ||
I'm choosing to be against discrimination and offensive laws against white people. | ||
So, again, what is the mindset that says if you're defending a group of people under attack, that means you therefore hate other groups or... | ||
You know, hold that group above other groups or think they're superior or are dividing people. | ||
No, I'm against targeted discrimination. | ||
I'm against attacks against ethnic groups or racist groups. | ||
In this world today, the white people are the target, so that's who I'm defending. | ||
So why would you say that I'm choosing a side or, you know, as if what I'm doing is somehow, you know, divisive? | ||
unidentified
|
America is not going to be able to heal until it just realizes it's Americans. | |
That's basically it. | ||
They want you to pick a side between white and black. | ||
They're doing those efforts to make you pick those sides. | ||
They are giving you no choice. | ||
They're painting you in the corner. | ||
By attacking whiteness, they are making you defend it at the same time. | ||
Or not defend it, but counteract their attack. | ||
That in itself is a trap. | ||
They're thousands of steps ahead of the game. | ||
We just have to literally set down their tools and walk away. | ||
And look at it from 35,000 feet, and you're going to see that all the strings attached to everybody is going to the same hand. | ||
But the attacks are still happening against white people. | ||
So should we defend against that? | ||
unidentified
|
Defend it, yes, but you also have to have enough sense about you to realize that it's not just an attack against white people, it's an attack against all Americans. | |
Black Americans hating white people, that serves their purpose. | ||
White Americans afraid of black Americans, that serves their purpose. | ||
White Americans thinking that black Americans are going to take the job, that serves their purpose. | ||
I mean, it is all serving the PSYOP purpose. | ||
So it's dangerous. | ||
I get what you're saying, but it's super dangerous to constantly focus on the differences of others when we have too much common ground between us. | ||
We really do. | ||
Super dangerous. | ||
I agree with that, but again, the PSYOP is... | ||
Telling white people that defending themselves is offensive and divisive and they need to not do that because, remember, it's attack against all Americans. | ||
It's like, okay, but white people are the ones being attacked right now, so that's who I'm going to defend. | ||
Again, I don't see how that's divisive. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I appreciate what you're saying, and I get it, but it's like... | ||
But that's the thing, is that the attacks aren't stopping, and it's not just like a psychological attack, it's a tangible attack too, right? | ||
When they say, like, Maine is too white, and then they dump a million Somalis into Maine, and the, you know, conditions of life tangibly get worse, that's something that should be defended against, and their attack is race-based, so how can the defense not be race-based? | ||
How do you defend against that without falling into their trap? | ||
Like, I honestly want to know, when they say Maine is too white, we need to send black people there, how do you defend against that without falling into the trap like you're explaining? | ||
unidentified
|
You've got to pray to God and ask for answers, but it's definitely a trap. | |
You just have to realize it and, you know, just do your best. | ||
But again, if the rhetoric is so towards one side, you obviously have to admit that it's going to radicalize a ton of people. | ||
Not if just normal people stand up against it and oppose it on the basis of principle rather than race, which is what I'm doing, but that gets confusing. | ||
I mean, I feel like it is sort of the same thing as Israel, where you're like, hey, they're committing genocide, and people are like, you hate all Jews! | ||
It's like, no. | ||
Methylene blue is all the rage. | ||
But for my listeners, we've been talking about it for decades. | ||
But finally, they've got factories. | ||
They've got... | ||
Laboratories that are producing medical, pharmaceutical, USP grade. | ||
And so, our sponsor, thealexshonestore.com, has it right now. | ||
The very highest quality. | ||
And I've taken USP grade before, and they claim it's USP grade. | ||
It works great. | ||
Massive energy, clarity, focus, no letdown. | ||
This is 10 times better. | ||
I'm actually scared of this. | ||
Because I've seen Robert Kennedy Jr. take three droppers on Air Force One. | ||
I took half a dropper and I'm bouncing off the walls hours later. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, we have the very best methylene blue I've ever had at the lowest price and it funds the Infowar, a total 360 win. |