April 30, 2025 - American Journal - Breanna Morello
02:37:11
The American Journal: Trump Roasts ABC In Exclusive Interview & Hosts Massive ‘First 100 Days’ Rally Touting Administration’s Achievements - FULL SHOW - 04/30/2025
Donald J. Trump’s first 100 days saw ICE arresting 66,000 illegal immigrants (65% criminal aliens linked to MS-13, Trendy, and Aragua gangs), while critics like Harrison Smith slammed media "fake news" over MS-13 claims and a Texas law forcing $4.4M in taxpayer funds to Israel, calling it unconstitutional. Alex Jones and callers accused judges of enabling illegal immigration, urged Trump to act aggressively—even against treasonous officials—and tied opposition to pagan holidays like Walpurgisnacht or communist recruitment tactics. Meanwhile, Mike Lindell’s deposition highlighted legal battles over "fraudulent cases," and John from California touted methylene blue (sold at thealexjonesstore.com) for energy, while Smith promoted auctionsimperial.com for rare Japanese arms. Trump’s $20B lawsuit against CBS and calls to ignore obstructive judges reflect a broader push to dismantle perceived deep-state corruption, framing survival as a zero-tolerance fight against both legal and ideological enemies. [Automatically generated summary]
Trump's saying we need to arrest, and you know he's directing that investigation, and it's cut and dry.
The people, the committee, the oligarchs, the plutocrats, the bureaucrats that are allied with much of the corrupt judiciary trying to- Continue on their bureaucratic judicial police state and unelected coup.
Just as the president has crashed the stock market with his illegal tariffs, he has crashed the justice system with his dreadful appointments and vindictive policies.
He's filled the leadership of the Department of Justice with his personal lawyers, unapologetically extremist sycophants like Kash Patel and Ed Martin who elevate their devotion.
To Trump over any semblance of fidelity to the Constitution, the rule of law, and the rules of professional responsibility.
unidentified
He used this like it was a fake Oval Office, weirdly, oddly.
And they say that 99 plus percent of all of the bills and orders and all of it were signed by Autopin.
They found two signatures that are his, that are different.
All the others are Autopin.
And then they checked.
Most of the time he was out of D.C., wasn't even around, and they admit didn't even read it.
People are kind of punch drunk over the tyranny.
It's just kind of, okay, we know it's there, but...
Yeah, we know they censor patriots to come after talk show hosts to come after Trump.
Yeah, they tried to kill him.
And yeah, they're child molesters.
And yeah, the borders, you know.
But it's kind of like, well, all right, that's just what they do.
So even though we're waking up, even though we're having some victories, there's still too much of a normalization about, well, that's just what, you know, the bureaucrats do.
They just plot to overthrow the president.
You know, Phil Mudd of the CIA goes on CNN and says, the CIA is going to kill this guy.
One was a memo from John Brennan to Eric Holder saying, "Charge him with espionage." And then Holder wrote back and said, "My people don't think he committed espionage."
unidentified
And then Brennan wrote back and said, charge him anyway and make him defend himself.
I'm going to wait until I'm going to come in in the morning or maybe even tonight and shoot something because I'm going to pick my daughter up right now.
But things didn't go too well in federal court for the bad guys today.
So every time I think we're about to get destroyed, this happens again.
We filed a filing with our intent with all the suits and things that are already going down.
The term for law for the technical term is abusive process.
We have them like one of the most famous, cut and dry, open, in my opinion, serious criminal activity.
And my lawyers filed a bombshell briefing with all the proof.
And the judge has ordered a major status conference that will be obviously for a major hearing.
Well, I mean, we've survived some real crazy takedowns.
They got their final judgment in Connecticut.
But we put this in front of a federal judge.
I mean, they told Bloomberg they were coming like this week.
So, you know, we're here getting all our final crap out, even all the little notes and stuff off the walls, most important stuff, you know, little knickknacks and funny stuff we've taken off the walls.
And the thing is, I'm just going to read our filing tomorrow, and I'm just going to make some minor statements because I've been asked not to particularly, but it's the list, and the listeners need to understand this, this is like a heavyweight boxing match that's gone right into the last round.
So that's why it just keeps going and going, just like with Trump in the fight against the globalists.
Who wants it more?
People say, why don't we just go do something else?
We're ready for that.
It's set up.
And your support allowed us to do the backup, the escape ship, that isn't as good as this, but it'll get as good as this.
So you are now as caught up as I am on the fate of Infowars.
I'll be watching the Alex Jones show later today to hear that briefing, which I guess has to be public.
I don't know if we have a copy of it.
Not that I'm going to preempt Alex on reading the whole thing.
But I would like to know what malfeasance we caught them in and what lies ahead.
And I'm telling you folks, if you think it's frustrating hearing this over and over, you don't know the half of it.
It's incredibly frustrating having to go through this for literally the last two years at least.
A full year of thinking...
That this building could imminently be padlocked and our goods confiscated and our website cut off.
But I guess we got a couple weeks at least.
I guess we got a couple weeks.
And still you get people online going, I thought the shutdown was imminent.
Like, yeah, so did we.
So did we.
It's...
Interminable is the word for it.
It goes on and on.
So here we are.
So here we are, remaining in the InfoWars headquarters for the time being.
Thankfully, it really has been, thank you, a win-win situation for us.
Either they pay attention to our pleadings and our filings and we're able to stay here, or...
We launch off in the ejection escape pods into something bigger and better than ever before.
So, regardless, we just so appreciate all of your support.
And trust us, if it was up to us, we would never, ever, ever, ever have to talk about this.
But it is necessary.
But it is funny seeing people act like what's happening isn't real and it's like all the filings are public.
All the proceedings are public.
Most of the time, you can find when it's happening and call in and listen in as it's happening live.
So, unless you think somehow Infowars has the ability to hijack and somehow fake federal court proceedings, I mean, it's all real, folks.
It's all real.
Just look into it.
It's all too real.
So, that's what I know about InfoWars so far, is that, well, we won't be shut down today.
And I mean, it is to the point where, like, I don't know, I mean, like a year ago, we took all of our personal stuff home, and slowly, after, you know, the reversals happened, we sort of brought stuff back.
Then yesterday, everything went home again.
All of the walls are bare.
All of the decorations have been taken down.
Not all of them, but most of them.
Took home all of my lapel pins.
You'll notice I'm not wearing one today because I don't have any at the office today.
And even like, I was talking to Chase because they did a really cute video over the weekend of Chase's daughter sitting behind Alex's desk.
And I was like, oh man, yeah, I want to do that with my son.
He's like, oh, you should come by this weekend.
I'm like, maybe you should come by tomorrow.
Like, literally yesterday I told my wife, like, yeah, you know, grab the boy from preschool and bring him by on Wednesday because I don't know if we're going to be here on Thursday.
And I want him to see the studio at least one more time before we're kicked out.
So again, if you think any of this is just like we're not taking it seriously, we're all as lost as you are in any of this.
Anyway, go to thealexjonesstore.com to keep us on the air and in the fight, regardless of what happens next.
And I genuinely am excited to hear the 35-page breakdown of all of the malfeasance, misbehavior of the other side.
Because apparently it's enough for the federal judge to not only stop the liquidation process that was happening, but to actually bring all of the parties involved together to determine how to proceed into the future.
It is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Wednesday, the 30th of April, 2025.
Wisconsin High Court suspends Milwaukee judge accused of helping man evade immigration authorities.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court suspended Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan on Tuesday.
Her suspension follows her Friday arrest by the FBI on federal charges.
The charges accuse her of concealing a man and obstructing a proceeding.
The court's two-page order stated suspension is effective immediately.
These suspension remains till further notice while a reserve judge fills her role.
So, just in case you thought this was some sort of despotic, dictatorial move by Trump acting unilaterally and without regard to The facts of the case, it's like, no, everybody of any genuine character who's involved in this,
perfectly willing to admit, yeah, what this woman did was completely out of line and obstructionary.
Obstructionist.
And again, like I explained yesterday, what this woman did, she wouldn't have done for her own brother.
I mean, in a very simple term, she just...
Helped pull off a hoax to allow a criminal to flee from federal authorities.
It's just completely absurd.
And again, it just lists the number of things that the Democrats are standing up for these days.
And it's just a list of criminals.
It's just a list of abject criminals.
That's all they have, I guess, at this point, is just defending the criminal element in this country.
From being confronted and disassembled by the Trump administration.
So that is what the Democrats stand for at this point.
Just so you know.
Just so Democrats are aware of what their party is all about these days.
They are wholly dedicated to stopping Trump from punishing criminals that are injuring.
Innocent people.
Innocent Americans.
Meanwhile, Ukraine ready to sign U.S. resources deal as early as Wednesday.
According to a report, Ukraine is ready to sign a natural resources deal with the U.S., a person familiar with the matter said, in a move that could bolster Washington's support for Kyiv by strengthening their economic partnership.
Well, we will wait to see, I guess.
I guess we'll just wait to see how that goes because, again, it just keeps flip-flopping how we haven't...
Gotten any closer to peace yet.
I genuinely don't understand.
But it looks like we're getting closer.
And there's Trump giving the talk to Volodymyr Zelensky in the Vatican.
Meanwhile, Maryland man, in quotes, Kilmar Abrego Garcia, was said to be a gang member in 2018 court documents.
I hesitated to even put this article on the list, but it was at the...
Top of the headlines I saw on a lot of conservative sites this morning.
But I don't really feel like we need to argue about this anymore.
I don't feel like we need to make the case.
I don't know why we're still talking about this guy.
Again, there should be 10 Kilmar Abrego Garcias every day.
What happened to flood the zone?
Honestly, the left is hyper-focused on whether it's this one judge being arrested or this one guy being deported.
It's like, arrest 100 more judges and deport 10,000 more Maryland men, and they won't be able to talk about it so much.
Excuse me.
According to the New York Post, Jennifer Vasquez Surra's ex, Edwin Trejo Ramos.
Why do I need to care about any of these people?
Yeah, the guy was a gang member.
The guy was a ruthless gang member.
He beat people.
He was a gang member.
He had the tattoos on his fingers showing he was a gang member.
It's just like...
Why do we even have to argue this?
I don't care.
I don't care how much.
I'm sure there's infinite evidence this dude's a criminal.
None of it matters.
He was an illegal alien.
Deport him.
Move on.
Why are we even talking about this?
So, great.
More information.
It's totally unnecessary and nobody cares.
Meanwhile, ICE arrests over 66,000 illegal immigrants during Trump's first 100 days in office.
More than 65,000 have been removed.
On Tuesday, U.S. Customs and Enforcement ICE announced that the federal agency has arrested more than 66,000 illegal immigrants during President Trump's first 100 days in office.
Among those apprehended were thousands of gang members involved in Trendy, Aragua and MS-13 and individuals convicted of serious crimes such as sex offenses and murder, according to ICE press release.
This comes as the immigration agency has been tasked to carry out the Trump administration's mass deportation operations, promising a promise the president made on the campaign trail.
65% of the arrests of this over 66,000 were criminal illegal aliens, noting the department prioritized the worst first.
And is it better than what we would have had under Kamala?
Absolutely.
Is it better than we had under Biden?
Absolutely.
Is the shutting down of the border a good thing?
100%.
We're all ecstatic.
Everybody's rejoicing.
Needs to be at least 10 times this aggressive.
And everybody's sort of getting this now.
And we'll show a video a little bit later of one of the top video game streamers in the world, Asmongold.
Because he's been making more political content, and he put it so well.
He put it so well, and I'll show it to you.
But the takeaway is, essentially, just like, you don't have to do this anymore, Trump.
You don't have to play this game.
You tried to be nice during your first administration.
We saw how it went.
They impeached you twice.
They just ruined everything you tried to do.
Despite all of it, you were still massively successful.
But we lived through the four years of Biden.
We voted you back into office.
Remember, Trump didn't moderate his second time around.
His third presidential campaign in 2024 was on a move towards the center and a moderating of his views.
He was more extreme, more far right the second time around.
That's what we voted for.
That's what we want.
That's what you have the mandate to do.
Just do it.
Just do it.
66,000 people.
That's one week of the people that came in under Joe Biden.
So what are we doing here?
These are not mass deportations.
That is not mass deportation.
I don't know.
I mean, there is no excuse.
There is no excuse for these low numbers, honestly.
And I really don't know what to make of it because Tom Homan certainly seems like he is doing everything he possibly can.
Like, out of anything in the Trump administration, The people there, out of all of the topics or policies they're sincere about, immigration is definitely the top.
Like, he's got Stephen Miller.
He's got Tom Homan.
He's got these people who, not just their current focus is on illegal immigration.
These people have, like, lifelong obsessions about this stuff.
So I don't know what to make of it, because obviously, I don't know, I think these guys are legit.
I think they really are.
Doing everything they can, but like, how are the numbers so low?
They are low.
I mean, you have to admit.
Operation Wetback in the 50s kicked out people at a more rapid clip than this.
So I don't understand how you don't just put a billion dollars towards this and just, I mean, all the money was there.
To pay for their hotels and their flights and everything else when they were coming in.
And I know we're just saying the same thing over and over as we've been saying since before Trump was even in office.
But it doesn't make it any less true.
A number of times we say it.
It is incredibly true.
Just where is the $10 billion funding an army to just round everybody up?
Where is it?
Why is it not happening?
I just don't understand.
Don't understand what's holding us back here.
So, like everything so far in Trump's administration, it's like, no, it's good.
It's good.
It's just not enough.
We're talking about the survival of our country here and not a lot of time to save it, so please just do it now.
Please, please, the love of God, just do what you have to do.
Meanwhile...
Native American woman to challenge David Hogg for position of DNC vice chair after party infighting.
David Hogg's tenure as vice chair of the DNC may be more short-term than expected.
He's been in the position for just a couple of months, but he's caused all kinds of problems for the party, mostly by announcing his plans to primary various members of the party for not being far-left enough for his liking.
Oh, gee, who could have thought?
Who would have known that putting in completely inexperienced leftist radicals in charge of the Democrat Party would cause more problems?
Who could have told you that?
Hilarious.
Members of the party have already given him an ultimatum to get in line or get out, but now he may face a challenge for his own position.
His challenger is another member of the DNC who happens to be a Native American woman.
Hogg might be about to get a harsh lesson.
Harsh lesson in the reality.
Of DEI policies.
We can get into this more, if for no other reason, just to mock the Democrats and their utter failure to manage absolutely anything at any level.
But I, for one, I don't know, I'm feeling...
My view on David Hogg has changed, I guess.
I'm a...
I'm a hog man now.
I'm all for David Hogg.
I think you voted him into the office.
Give him a chance.
Give the young man a chance, won't you?
Just let him implement some of his ideas.
Let him send out the fundraising emails for his personal projects on DNC email lists.
Just let the kid have a chance, won't you?
You're going to put this poor young man who survived being...
At the same school, technically, I mean, enrolled there during a school shooting.
You're really going to remove him from office like this?
I mean, that's going to be traumatic.
You don't want to cause him trauma, do you?
Let the man have a chance.
Let him stay in power.
And if anything, I think it's because he's facing so much resistance.
I think for the sake of the Democrats, they need to just get out of his way.
Get out of his way.
Let the man with the vision achieve his goals.
And maybe you'll have some victory here.
Okay?
So we're all in on Team Hogg.
We're all in on Team Hogg here.
And I just think, you know, for the sake of...
The Democratic Party.
I mean, it's best for them, I think, if they stick to this.
And if anything, give him more power.
I think he should have more power, more influence.
Again, I think the problem is all this backbiting, all this talking behind his back, all this undermining and subverting going on.
He just needs to clean up the ranks and embrace the power he's been given.
unidentified
Okay. All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, and I'd like to put a little feather in my cap, but also
I couldn't have done it without you.
As of this morning, We have soundly ratioed the governor of Texas.
Greg Abbott yesterday on his official X account wrote this.
Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies.
Now we could spend an hour breaking down that little phrase.
That particular sentence doesn't make any sense.
What does that even mean?
Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies?
Great point, Greg.
What?
What do you mean?
What are you talking about?
Sorry, he continues.
Sent a letter to the city of San Marcos today condemning its proposed anti-Semitic resolution openly flouting Texas state law.
Texas will not tolerate anti-Semitism.
Attached to this is this letter to the hamlet of San Marcos, the small town of San Marcos, Texas, just about 30 miles southwest of us here in Austin.
Home of Texas State.
Lyndon Baines Johnson.
Once called his alma mater.
And I responded to this, and the letter basically is saying, which is absolutely insane, basically San Marcos, this not large town in Texas, was sending $4.4 million a year to the state of Israel.
Why the city has decided?
To gift millions of dollars to a foreign state out of their taxpayer money?
God only knows.
But San Marcos discovered this or figured this out or, you know, actually looked at their books and said, well, what are we doing?
How about instead of sending all of this money to a foreign state, like a charity, we spend this money on local projects?
And in response to that...
Governor Greg Abbott called them all anti-Semites and said they're breaking Texas law.
So I responded to him by saying this is a violation of the separation of church and state.
Jews do not have the right to force their religion on everyone through the government.
And as of this morning, his post has just over 9,000 likes and mine has 14,000 likes.
So I am now your governor, Texas.
That's how it should work, I think.
Mags at Aspen underscore Lindsay says, did I interpret this correctly?
The city wants over $4 million in taxes directed back to domestic use instead of going to Israel, but the governor says they're in violation if they do so.
This is absurd.
And yeah, yeah, now she's got that right.
Yeah, that is what is happening here.
Why it's happening?
Well, it's a very anti-Semitic question you'd ask.
How dare you?
Andrew Meyer, of course, responds to this.
Of course, proving, once again, not everybody has their principles skewed and warped and become unrecognizable when their particular ethnic group is the group in question.
But if you don't understand the religious argument, it's not that complicated.
Well, I mean, it's convoluted.
It's not really complicated, but it is convoluted because they treat Israel like a religious institution.
And they're predicating the support of Israel or stopping the ending of support in Israel through claims of anti-Semitism.
And so it would be weird enough if...
This was just a completely secular foreign state somehow receiving billions of our tax dollars through the U.S. government in just innumerable ways.
It's practically incalculable how much money we actually send to Israel from the various aid packages and weapons.
That's the national level.
I'm sure our state is also giving them money, paying them homage, right?
Paying them protection money, I guess.
Like some sort of mafia.
Like why are we just...
It just literally makes no sense.
We're taxing American taxpayers, taking that money by force, and then sending it overseas.
And saying you can't stop or else you hate Jews.
What?
It's like...
How would that shakedown work?
We've all seen the...
The mafia movies of, yeah, it's a nice shop you have here, but you know, these neighborhoods can be a little tough.
You give us some money, we'll make sure nothing happens.
And of course, what they're really saying is, we're going to throw a brick through your window if you don't give us money.
We've got to dress it up a little bit at least.
But it's like, yeah, nice little shop you have here.
It'd be a shame if someone thought you hated Italians.
It'd be a shame if I told everybody that you refused to give, out of goodness of your heart, to the Italian-American community and that you hate us.
What?
I don't hate you.
I'm just not going to give you money.
What are you talking about?
So they got this mafia shaked out.
Why are small towns in Texas are sending millions of dollars a year?
To this state, it would be absurd and ridiculous if it was just whatever secular state you want to point to.
But then it's the fact that they treat it like the reason that we need to send them money is because they're a religious institution.
So again, just in an effort here, in a desperate attempt to circumvent the very powerful indoctrination people are in, Would it make sense how this has a religious aspect to it if he was saying that you have to fund the Vatican?
That San Marcos is under an obligation, a legal obligation to tax its citizens, take their money, or to fund the Catholic Church and their institutions?
Would that be fair to non-Catholic members of the San Marcos community?
I don't think so.
So they're treating Israel like the Vatican, like a...
A quasi-religious but still full UN member state.
They're essentially saying that they're making their arguments on religious grounds.
Saying it's anti-Semitic.
It is against the religion of the Jews to not send them money.
So how dare you?
We can read the actual post here by the governor.
We can go through it.
He says, I am aware.
First of all, what, I mean, why even is the San Marcos?
What?
No, their resolutions should be about trying to preserve.
The aquifer from being depleted by all the new builds in San Marcos that are destroying its natural water features that drive the tourism to that city.
But no, I'm sorry, they're busy condemning what's happening in Palestine.
It says, but I have not found any past resolution that unequivocally condemns targeting civilians by Hamas or affirms that Jews murdered on October 7th were, quote, entitled to live life in safety and free from violence.
City council members voted to bring this pro-Hamas resolution.
I noticed that you didn't condemn Hamas.
How dare you?
What?
Again, just what are we talking about here?
Are they sending Hamas $4.4 million?
You might have a case there, Governor.
If instead of sending the money to Israel, they were in fact sending $4.4 million to Hamas, then maybe you'd have a point here.
But this is nothing.
This is absolutely nothing.
Israel, he says, is a stalwart ally of the United States and a friend to Texas.
Why?
Because they say so.
That's why.
What have they done to show their help and friendliness?
Absolutely nothing.
No, genuinely.
The opposite.
Actually, it's pretty much entirely the opposite.
How many soldiers did Israel send to Texas to defend the border during our crisis?
Did they at least send funds to help us protect our border from the invasion of Mexico?
No?
No, instead the Israeli-aligned...
Jewish charity groups were really the driving force behind the immigration issue, destroying our country, destroying our state in particular, being the hardest hit out of all the border states.
But they're our greatest allies.
Stalwart.
They're stalwart allies.
They're so stalwart, aren't they?
Again, is there any evidence of that?
I just want to know.
I just really want to know if there's any evidence of this stalwart alliance or whether us sending the money is the whole and complete existence of the alliance.
Is they get our money and in exchange we get immigrants?
Israel is a stalwart ally of the United States and a friend to Texas, he asserts without evidence.
I have repeatedly made clear that Texas will not tolerate anti-Semitism.
No, we know.
No, we get it.
Anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas policies.
Can somebody explain that one to me?
Genuinely.
Can you put any country in there?
And does it make any more or less sense?
I just, sometimes they just say these things.
And it's like, have we thought about what this sentence is really?
Over a year ago, following Hamas' cowardly attack and campus disruptions, openly celebrating terrorism.
I issued an executive order addressing anti-Semitism in higher education.
I have proudly signed legislation prohibiting government entities from supporting efforts to boycott, divest from, and sanction Israel.
That remains the law here.
Well, it shouldn't be.
Honestly, you should be impeached and tried for treason.
This is the thing.
None of this makes any sense.
Just from a purely...
Objective point of view.
What are they talking about?
What are they saying?
What does this mean?
How do they think this is an effective argument?
I genuinely don't.
So you're not allowed to boycott, divest, or sanction Israel.
Why not, though?
But why not?
There's no reason.
Oh, because anti-Israel policies are anti-Texas.
Oh, sorry, I forgot.
Because anti-Israel is anti-Texas, apparently.
Or the other way around.
I can't remember.
It doesn't matter.
This means nothing.
In Texas, no governmental entity may enter into a contract worth $100,000 or more unless it includes a written verification that the contracting entity does not boycott Israel and will not boycott Israel during the term of the contract.
Now, this is a...
Very regular thing.
This has been in place for a very long time.
And it includes things like, you know, Hurricane Harvey from a couple years ago and the cleanup there.
And the companies contracted to do the cleanup and repair and repair infrastructure and stuff for, or even getting like insurance payments to rebuild houses for Hurricane Harvey.
They all decided to sign a pledge to support Israel.
Why?
Jewish mafia, I guess?
I mean, I can't think of another reason.
That's the thing.
If there's no genuine, legitimate reason why this country alone...
I mean, we have a lot of allies that are actual genuine allies around the world.
None of them have this clause where you have to support them or else you don't get government contract work.
And again, if it was just a secular foreign state, it would already be...
Nonsense.
This would already be absurd.
The fact that they predicate this and are couching this argument in religious overtones and religious considerations, then it's even worse.
That just absolutely makes it a violation of the First Amendment.
The government does not have a right to force companies to support a religion or a church or a sect or a synagogue or a mosque.
They don't.
They don't have a right to force you to send your tax monies to religious institutions that you're not a part of and that you don't adhere to.
So, what is the reason?
Again, it's just...
It's mafia.
It's mafia tactics.
It's just pure and simple, pure, plain.
It's like, okay, yeah, they...
She's going back to the shakedown metaphor.
It's like, no, the mafia is protecting them.
You don't get what's really happening here?
Who do they need protection from?
Oh, the mafia?
Okay, so the mafia is protecting them from themselves?
So you don't have to listen to the lies that they're saying about why this is happening.
So again, it's like, oh, they're doing it because they're protecting whatever, whatever.
They're stopping anti-Semitism.
It's like, no, they're just being threatened into complicity.
It's not that complicated.
A governmental entity includes a political subdivision like the city of San Marcos, and boycott to Israel means refusing to deal with, terminating business activities with, or otherwise taking any action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations specifically with Israel.
They're saying that basically they made this law...
Saying that no governmental entity could contract with a company that didn't support Israel.
And they're like, oh, and by governmental entity, we also mean the city that you live in.
Your whole city is not allowed to boycott or in any way inflict economic harm on Israel, i.e.
withholding money that they want, I guess.
The proposed resolution seems calculated to violate this law by calling for San Marcos to limit its commercial relations with Israel.
Specifically, the resolution identifies $4,434,675 that came from San Marcos residents that was sent to Israel.
It then calls for the reallocation of such local funds away from Israel's military towards essential domestic priorities.
Well, are they Nazis?
No, I just, that's like what Hitler did.
How dare they decide not to send Israel $4 million and instead spend it on their own infrastructure and services?
I can't believe, I can't believe they would do such a thing.
How dare they?
It's difficult to believe that a city so carefully accounting for every dollar flowing to Israel and determined to reallocate those funds in a self-described embargo on your ally is at the same time requiring written verification from its contracting partners that they will not boycott Israel.
The public expression of a desire to do what state law prohibits is unacceptable.
It's unacceptable that you not support Israel.
Our greatest ally.
Whenever San Marcos enters into grant agreements with my office, it is required to certify that it will comply with all state laws, including laws prohibiting government support for boycotts of Israel.
My office is already reviewing active grants with San Marcos to determine whether the city has breached terms by falsely certifying compliance with Texas law.
If the city council adopts this resolution, the office of the governor will not enter into any future agreements with the city and will swiftly determinate active grants for noncompliance.
I will further direct other state agencies to review agreements with the city for possible breach.
So the same thing that's happening at the national level is happening at the state level.
Same thing they're doing to Harvard University.
They're doing to the city of San Marcos.
And it's just, we have the strings of power.
We control the purse.
Shut up or be destroyed.
And that's all that's happening.
It's very gangster-ish, I guess you could say.
Infuriating.
Obviously, making me more anti-Semitic, ironically, to read this article.
Like, that's the thing, and Andrew Meyer said it, right?
It's not good for, this isn't good for, it doesn't stop anti-Semitism, and it ain't good for the Jews.
It, in fact, only gives fuel to the fire of people who claim that Israel and the Jewish lobby has not just a stranglehold on the national government, but has this widespread decentralized Basis of control that they manifest at the state level and the local level to the extent that your small town is being threatened by the governor to withhold contracts,
withhold, I don't know, I mean, what does the state government provide?
Highway patrol?
So they're going to stop patrolling the highways near San Marcos?
Are they going to stop?
State subsidies that every other city receives to try to disadvantage San Marcos for daring to not steal their taxpayer money and send it to carry out a genocide overseas for the benefit of one particular religious group over all others.
So that's why I ratioed the governor because everybody sees what this is and it's just not helping anybody.
I gotta say, I don't know.
I don't know what's happening in Texas.
Genuinely don't know.
Tonight I unveiled a cornerstone plaque that will be on the U.S. Embassy in Israel.
It recounts the Texas-Israel connection, and it has the Texas seal on it.
I mean, I know that like, you know, in the 50s and 60s, there was a very...
You know, powerful Jewish mafia that was gun-running from Texas, sending arms illegally to the terrorists that were founding Israel.
Is that the connection he's talking about?
There's a lot of history there.
A lot of the same names that you'll find in the JFK documents, actually.
Is that what he means?
The special Israel-Texas connection when they killed the president in Dallas?
Is that what he's talking about?
I'm not sure.
I think I'm missing the Israel-Texas connection beyond Texas being a, I guess, convenient platform for gun-running to terrorists that would then become prime ministers of Israel.
So what are we doing here?
So what is this exactly?
But again, I genuinely don't.
I don't get what's going on with Texas.
I mean, I know we've been absolutely flooded with illegal immigrants over the last hundred years or so.
To the extent that, as of last year, white people are a minority to the supermajority of Hispanics in this country.
And they tend to vote Democrats, and Democrats tend to be the servants of international power.
But I'm ashamed.
But frankly, I am genuinely ashamed.
Anger as U.S. state passes bill to criminalize political memes.
Offenders risk a jail term.
The Texas House of Representatives has passed a bill aiming at criminalizing political memes.
The bill, HB 366, would imprison offenders for a minimum of one year if the meme does not have a government-approved disclaimer.
The bill was sponsored by a lawmaker representing District 21 and former Speaker of the House McDadefella?
What?
What is this?
Dailypost.ng?
This is just the first response on Google.
That is not the guy's name.
This is very weird.
The development has been generating anger on social media with several people condemning the move.
106 members of the Texas House want to censor your political memes.
Quote, Memes unpopular politicians will now be subject to scrutiny by the speech police at the Texas Ethics Commission.
Another ex-user, Laura Loomer, wrote, You live in Texas.
Did you know that the GOP legislature in Texas under Rhino Representative Burroughs just passed House Bill 366, which would jail Texans for one year unless their political memes or AI posts online have government-approved disclaimers?
We actually have a video of this.
I'll show you on the other side.
I'm ashamed.
I have nothing more to say.
I'm ashamed.
I'm ashamed at what Texas is allowing itself to become.
I'm ashamed that instead of being a state legislature on the forefront of protecting and preserving our First Amendment, we are systematically eradicating it.
And I'm open to suggestions on what we do to fight back.
But clearly we are...
I mean, it makes sense, right?
Because Texas was this large, powerfully conservative state, of course we got targeted for the invasion and now we have 100-foot statues of Indian demon gods and Muslim-only neighborhoods cropping up across the state.
The dispossession is on.
Alright, welcome back, folks.
This is the American Journal.
We have a lot of videos to show you.
There's a lot of Trump appearances yesterday.
I have a lot of videos that are really long, so I don't know if I'll be able to get to them, but they're not as much breaking news as they are.
I have a video from 1994 of this guy talking about the effects that NAFTA will obviously have.
Just to give a little historical context to the fact that We knew all along what the effects of free trade would be and selling out to China and all that stuff.
I want to play some of those videos, but I've got to go to this video.
Clip number six.
I don't even know if I need to intro this in any way, but it's almost better without context.
It's almost like the platonic form of Democrat corruption.
It's like you don't even need to know who it is or what position he's in or who's questioning him.
It's just without context and in a purely objective form, it is like the perfect expression of the frustration and annoyance that decent people feel when trying to get answers out of corrupt Democrats.
Let's just watch.
unidentified
How many relatives, including in-laws, do you have on your payroll?
In your various groups.
You know, we hire based on qualifications and solidly based on qualifications.
I'm assuming they're all beautifully qualified.
How many of these beautifully qualified relatives do you have on your staff, in-laws or not in-laws?
Everyone on my staff are uniquely qualified for the positions.
I'm not questioning that.
I think they're all great.
How many of them are there, and what is their relationship, and what are you paying them?
I appreciate the question sir, but I came here to do a job and I'm gonna get the best of the best and I'm glad to tell you that I have-I'm giving you the best.
What are you paying and how many are there?
I think there is no secret.
The transport portal tells me who's your brother-in-law, who's your cousin?
Man, that's a hell of a portal.
Well, I'm very proud to tell you that I stand with my team members.
They are the best in the business.
Did you hire one of your brother-in-laws for a newly created position and pay him more than $100,000?
I appreciate the question, sir.
You did, didn't you?
You're not answering?
You did do that, right?
I do have the best of the best in our office, and I'm proud to say.
Secretary of State's office has deepest state government employees.
Mr. Secretary, I've been here a long time, but I've never seen such an abject refusal to tell the public what you're doing, and you're here asking for millions of dollars in increases for your office, and you won't answer these fundamental questions.
I will have to vote against any part of the budget for your agency, given that.
You take no-bid contracts.
You have a bonus program that is not an organized program.
You won't tell me who your in-laws are or relatives who work for you.
You won't deal with the fact that you give no-bid contracts and then get tens of thousands of dollars in political contributions.
So, just for the record, I'm not asking you more questions because I'm sick of these refusals.
And you're going to get a no vote on every aspect of your budget from this seat, and I hope from many others.
See, what we just witnessed there was a generational but also an ethnic clash between the American way of doing things and the non-American way of doing things.
Getting into office and then creating jobs for all of your family members, very normal practice in corrupt society.
Like, you're stupid if you don't do that.
In Mexico, or in Guatemala, or in the Congo, or any other developing and deeply corrupt society.
That's anathema to the American mindset and ideal.
At least it was.
At least it was when that guy was growing up, right?
When the state representative got to know about how the government works, you would never see something like this.
But things are changing.
Things are changing.
And I do enjoy, in a perverse sort of way, hearing a guy say, we elect people who are solely qualified.
You can't even speak English.
You're making up words that don't exist.
But you're going to tell us who's most qualified for this?
I'm going to return to this question on the other side.
Alright, welcome back folks.
We just watched a clip of...
Somebody, and if the crew can bring up those, the crew found articles about this exact scandal, again, even without the context, even without the details, even without knowing who this guy is, you understand all of it, right?
You understand everything that just happened there.
And I think this is a good thing to point at.
So Indiana's Secretary of State hiring family, handing out no-bid contracts.
So he's the Secretary of State.
Great.
Yes, Indiana's Secretary of State did hire his brother-in-law for a $108,000 job in his state agency.
And apparently this was a position that didn't even exist before.
Wouldn't that be in violation of Indiana's nepotism rules?
You would think so.
One would think.
And just the way he responds, right, it's just, it's infuriating.
Again, I don't know how to express this to people if they can't see it themselves.
Nobody is going to tell you that the average American governmental entity is as corrupt as the average governmental entity in Mexico.
Everybody acknowledges this reality.
Most people have felt this reality if they've been to Mexico.
If you've ever visited Mexico, you probably got shaken down at some point.
Most people have.
Everyone I know who's been to Mexico has experienced this.
Everybody I've talked to in Mexico, all the Mexicans I talk to, it is a prominent part of their life.
The bite, as they call it.
A little bit extra that you gotta dish out to the person who is supposed to just be a functionary of the state.
Right?
I mean, just think about how pervasive this is.
And it doesn't matter whether the Secretary of State making jobs for his brother or, you know, the local tax assessor getting an extra $100 from the small business owner to file his, you know,
LLC or whatever it is.
It's this idea that, like, well, you're in this position of power where you...
Have the authority to file or not file the thing, so if people want to file your thing, you should get a little extra for it.
You're the one with the power, after all.
You're the one with the position.
Why shouldn't you benefit?
Why shouldn't your friends and family benefit?
Why shouldn't you wield this power against your fellow citizens to get a little extra off the top?
Everybody else is doing it, right?
So, like, do we want to become like that?
Is that a better world to live in?
You ask the average boomer out there?
Would you rather have a Mexican-style corruption level in this country?
Everybody's going to say no.
So what are you doing to prevent it?
What are you doing to stop that from coming here?
just, I just...
Genuinely, it's like...
Here's the breakdown.
Here's where it breaks down.
Here's where it breaks down.
Our system is, first of all, set up for moral, upright people who won't take advantage of vulnerabilities like this.
So, just the mere existence of this guy as Secretary of State shouldn't really be allowed.
And the idea is...
That the people who vote, people into positions of power, should be outraged when they discover something like this happens.
The natural corrective measures that should automatically kick into effect in the American system is when a Secretary of State is discovered to be handing out six-figure jobs to his immediate family members.
Then nobody should want to vote for that person.
Everybody who hears that should feel offended that their vote they gave in confidence to this person has now been squandered and he's taking advantage of and he's robbing from them.
That doesn't really happen though, does it?
We showed the video yesterday of the California audience booing the politician who was simply Telling them that their money had been stolen to the tune of $16 billion.
He goes, you people paid $16 billion for a train, and there is no train, but the money's been spent.
And they're mad at him for saying that.
And they're booing him for telling them that.
Explain it.
Explain it to me.
Explain this to me.
I guarantee you there are people listening to me right now that are mad at me for talking about This Secretary of State being corrupt.
Why?
God only knows.
But there is a way that they're going to twist this and they're going to play this because you heard the questioner there who was asking him about all of the contracts he's given to family members, all the nepotism that this guy's participated in.
And he says, I'm not going to vote to give your branch of the government any more money because I can't guarantee it's being spent correctly.
So we're cutting you off until you can actually answer these questions because he never answers the question.
And again, there's just something weird that happens with like the empire of lies, the corrupt cloud of deception that surrounds everything.
It's like, even when we know.
He's asking questions.
He's like, did you hire your brother-in-law and give him a $100,000 job?
Yes, he did.
He absolutely did.
But he can't admit that.
Even though everybody knows it, he's going to pretend like he doesn't have to answer it or can trick us somehow.
It's weird.
It's just weird how it's like everything becomes like a confidence game.
It's just like as long as you don't admit that that's what you did, you can keep pretending like you didn't do it even though it's just undeniable, absolutely yes, that did happen.
As long as he doesn't admit it.
It's like it never happened.
It's like hocus pocus, abracadabra, suddenly, magically, because you don't invoke the language, it doesn't exist anymore.
I don't know.
I don't know what it is, this mentality, but it works for them because what's going to happen is this guy, this old white guy in the city council is going to withhold money from the State Department or whatever the Secretary of State is engaged in.
And the Secretary of State is going to go and say, this damn Republican is depriving you of funds.
I'm trying to help my community.
I'm trying to give my community things.
Because at the end of the day, a lot of democracy just devolves into paying people for their votes.
Right?
Pay for me and you'll get reparations.
Vote for me, you'll get reparations.
Vote for me, you'll get subsidies.
You'll get...
Special carve-outs.
You'll get all these things.
So vote for me and you'll benefit.
The mercenary aspects of this are very disgusting.
And so he's going to blame that.
He's going to say, now I'm not able to give you what you deserve, other people's money.
Because this damn Republican is stopping him.
And he's come up with some, this crazy idea that I'm hiring my brother, even though I did and am.
But to ignore that, I'm not going to admit that.
I'm going to say I hired the best and the brightest.
Everybody is solely qualified for the position that they're in.
And so he's going to tell the voters, you know, the pain you're feeling now that your subsidies are being cut off, now that you're...
Support is being eliminated.
That's those damn Republicans who just want to hurt you.
And so they're keeping money out of your hands to punish me because they hate me because I'm your champion.
Now again, in a society that's filled with people that are intelligent, thoughtful, honest, righteous, who want what's best, the type of people that return their shopping carts,
Then this wouldn't fly.
This wouldn't work.
He'd be out of office.
Hell, he'd probably have a recall against him.
But that's not going to happen because it comes down to, what's this, new $90,000 taxpayer-funded SUVs for Diego Morales.
It's at the point that it's the Indiana Secretary of State doing this.
Already, small towns in Texas are experiencing this with cartels.
There are stories from a few years ago of a small, you know, like a county in Texas.
Hardly even has a city worth naming, but...
They're building a big high school football stadium, which in Texas, you look at the high-budget line items in Texas education, we spend tens of millions of dollars on high school football stadiums, and they're huge and very nice.
And what you find is that one of the city councilmen who approved the building of this new construction site and who has...
Friends and family in the construction business are overcharging the taxpayers by millions of dollars, and it's literally all cartel-connected.
So you've got basically cartel outposts in small Texas towns just robbing the taxpayers and funneling construction work to their buddies' firms and overcharging it by millions and millions of dollars.
But you've got this huge swath of voters who, A, are ethnically radicalized.
These people that are out on the streets waving Mexican flags, chanting Lo Raza, talking about taking back Mexican land.
It's been American for 200 years.
And people that are dependent on the government.
And would rather vote for a corrupt person that's going to be nepotistic and going to give their friends jobs, but is still going to send them a $1,000 check.
What do they care if he gives somebody a job?
What do they care if he's nepotistic?
They want theirs.
They want other people's money.
So as long as they keep promising to funnel them other people's money, they're going to keep voting for him.
So it's just corruption upon corruption.
It's just this feedback loop.
It goes on forever and goes on everywhere.
In fact, I'm going to pull in another video about the way this is happening in Ireland, of all places.
There's this content creator that I've really been enjoying.
I don't know.
He sort of came out of nowhere for me.
I don't know if he's been around long.
I don't know when he got started, but his name is Michael McCarthy.
He does a lot of really good sort of, I guess you could say, TikTok-style videos.
Where'd it go?
Sorry, I just downloaded it and I tried to move it in and it's gone.
And I'm going to show you this video because it's the same thing happening in Ireland that's happening in the United States, in this case with illegal immigration.
But it just benefits themselves.
They're just robbing the American people blind.
But again, it's like if you don't pay taxes, Are subsidized by the state, don't actually care about the American system anyway, and think it should be destroyed in the first place.
What do you care if people are just taking a little off the top?
The whole system's rotten, so why shouldn't they try to get what they're...
Again, it's a feedback loop, and that's all there is to it.
It's a feedback loop.
It's a snowball rolling downhill.
It's just the more...
Corrupt we become, the more corrupt we become.
And it just doubles down on itself.
Let's go to this video.
This, again, is Michael McCarthy breaking down the feedback loop that's occurring in Ireland in the same way it's occurring here in America.
This would never happen if, like, only taxpayers voted or the voters themselves.
You know, sincerely believed in the underlying principles of our system.
These people would be voted out of office, but because they use their position in the office to benefit their constituents, funnel money to them, funnel benefits to them, they're going to get back in office.
Here's how it's happening in Ireland.
Let's watch.
unidentified
See this guy here?
Well, I didn't know about him, but today I do.
So his name is Donny Cassidy, and he has been heavily involved in Fianna Fáil, which is the biggest political party in Ireland right now.
He was the vice president of it.
This man was involved in Golfgate, and that's when 80 politicians and judges got together during COVID, while everyone else was restricted.
Some old people even dying in nursing homes by themselves.
But these people got to have a nice dinner party.
For themselves.
But let's move on from that.
Because it's in the past.
Let's go to the present day.
Then you're probably thinking, oh, why?
What's happening in present day Ireland that they're doing right now?
This man is now making millions through iPass.
Emergency accommodation.
It's millions being given to them.
He has one company called Great Denmark Hospitality Limited, which has been paid five million in state contracts for emergency accommodation.
Doesn't stop, does it?
These politicians in Ireland.
And get this, this is crazy.
The most recent accounts tell us that Cassidy pays Dalita Hotels a hundred thousand a year to manage the place.
So he pays them a hundred thousand and he charges The state, you, the taxpayer, 1.5 million.
Imagine that.
What do you think?
Is that a scandal?
I still don't know.
Do you think this IPAS system is a scam?
Hmm.
Hmm.
Is this a way to funnel tax money into the hands of a few?
And well done to Nick Dalahanty, who's probably one of the best people in Ireland right now for investigating this stuff.
Across the globe, and you would think, under a democratic system or even a representative republic, that people who so flagrantly abuse their positions of power, steal taxpayer money, create jobs for their friends and family who aren't qualified for it.
You would think, in the minds of the voters, that would be disqualifying, but it depends on your voters, I guess.
I guess it depends on your voters.
What they've been told to prioritize or what they view the government as.
And we have a lot of people in this country and indeed around the world who view the government as simply a means of taking other people's stuff by proxy.
So as long as you're taking other people's stuff and giving it to them, they could not care less about the corruption, the other corruption you're engaged in.
So again, we can move on.
But that exchange, like I said, is just like...
If you wanted a two-minute video that explained everything happening in America today, I think that's it.
I think that's the illustrative example of the current state of America.
And it's just pathetic.
It really is.
We have a lot of videos to get to.
I do want to remind you.
I mean, I guess you have a little bit of time now to go to thealexjonesstore.com and get InfoWars branded merchandise.
Although, who knows?
Again, I don't know.
God only knows.
Maybe somebody out there knows, but they're not telling me what's happening with InfoWars next.
We don't know.
We'll be tuning in to The Alex Jones Show later today to get a breakdown of the cases that we've filed.
But in the meantime, and no matter what happens, thealexjonesstore.com is going to be the best possible way for you to support us and guarantee that we continue what we do into the future.
The InfoWars sale, the InfoWars Legacy Collection, the Last Stand sale, it's got a couple different names of the benefits.
Are incredible.
50% off InfoWars collection, plus with every order you will receive a free flag and gem towel.
See, InfoWars never dies sale.
50% off InfoWars merchandise, plus a free InfoWars flag and towel with every order.
So, don't wait until the next inexplicable reversal comes down from the courts.
Go now to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison.
Make your purchase.
And get the free flag and gym towel with every purchase.
Plus, you're getting additional discounts if you're a VIP member.
These are t-shirts, hats, and all sorts of branded items.
As a tribute to the unrelenting pursuit of freedom and truth pulled straight from the heart of the broadcast, wear these designs with pride and carry on the legacy of the Infowar forever.
Go now to thealexjonesstore.com and make your purchase.
We'll go to clip number three here.
This is just kind of a funny mashup.
Trump did a rally yesterday.
He did an interview yesterday.
He had a couple good one-liners while going out to his helicopter.
There's lots of great Trump content from yesterday.
Here's a little compilation of his interview with ABC where, frankly, it was burn after burn after burn.
I think actually we need to censor clip 13. If the crew wouldn't mind censoring clip 13, I think it occurs a little bit.
But that's the clip I was talking about earlier with the streamer.
I think his name is Asmongold.
Giving Trump some advice about how he should act.
And it's like, for the last two weeks, three weeks at this point, this story has dominated the headlines.
With everything that we've got going on, with everything happening in the world today and in America today, is it not just kind of pathetic?
How much bandwidth we're spending discussing the tattoos on the fingers of an El Salvadorian man.
What are we doing here?
What are we talking about?
It doesn't matter.
I mean, it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter.
Dude's an illegal alien.
Get him out.
Is he a gang member?
All signs point to that being the case.
Absolutely.
Is that more reason to kick him out?
I guess.
Is it necessary to confirm that before you kick him out?
No.
So what are we talking about?
So what are we doing?
Why are we talking about this?
Why do we care?
Who cares?
Who cares?
Like I said, there should be 10 Kilmar Abrego-Garcias a day.
The most powerful country in the world.
And the history of the world is seemingly grinding to a halt to debate whether some El Salvadorian goblins' finger paints represent gang affiliations.
Who cares?
What does that say?
Not even Abbott and Costello themselves could have scripted this web of confusion.
Wow, it's so confusing.
Maybe you should chop his fingers off.
If you just chop his fingers off, he won't have the tattoos and then we won't have to talk about this anymore.
Maybe that's the solution.
Why do we care?
Why do we care about that?
Why?
It doesn't matter.
It really doesn't matter.
Of course, the tattoos do mean he belongs to a gang.
I mean, that is true.
And it's funny because people have gone through the social media of this guy's wife.
By the way, the wife that he beat.
And every picture of him on social media that has his hand in the frame, the hand is covered up with a cartoon heart sticker picture.
So the wife thinks these tattoos are important enough to every time she posts a picture of this guy on social media, she covers them up with an innocuous looking...
So, again, every time she would post this, she would, oh, no, it's just I put a heart next to us so much we love each other.
No, yeah, she's covering up the tattoos.
And every picture she posts with those, she covers up those tattoos.
Because they're gang signs.
Because they show that he's in a gang.
And so they post this picture of the guy's tattoos.
And it doesn't say MS-13.
It's like marijuana, skull, cross, or marijuana, smiley face, cross, skull.
And it's like, you know, it's a sign from MS-13.
And if you don't know that gangs have codes, I mean, how do you not know this?
They've got hand signs.
They've got...
Colors that mean things.
I mean, there's a very sophisticated, symbolic language that gangs understand and use to show their affiliation.
So they show this image, and then clearly they put on top of the picture MS-13 to show you what the symbols stand for.
Now ABC is telling you this image is photoshopped.
Because they think what Trump is saying is that that M, the S, and the 1, and the 3 are in fact tattooed on his fingers.
Nobody is making that argument.
So it's not even about the finger tattoos.
It's about the lying media.
It's about the way the media is lying to you.
And we'll say that picture is photoshopped.
Expecting you to take away the idea that the guy didn't have tattoos.
Or the tattoos didn't mean what they say that they meant.
Or that it was a different person's hand.
That they say were a kill mark.
But no.
What they're saying is that by putting the labels MS-13 on top of the symbols that mean MS-13, they're trying to trick you and therefore the image doesn't count.
It doesn't matter.
It's photoshopped.
It's a deep fake.
You can ignore it.
It's a cheap fake.
So, it's just...
We know the media lies continually.
The fact that that interviewer would say that photo was photoshopped, that is a blatant lie.
That is a blatant lie.
Relying on the stupidity of the American people, or the ignorance of the American people.
During the break, I was searching for news stories about this.
I found one story out of ten that actually showed the image of the hand.
That's kind of interesting, isn't it?
They're writing entire articles about this picture of this hand and the tattoos on the hand and the letters on top of the hand.
They're describing it in detail and they never show the picture.
Seriously, I went to 10 different articles.
The only one that had one was some Yahoo News article that actually showed the picture that we keep showing you here.
Why wouldn't they want to show the picture if it's so innocuous, if it proves their case that this thing was photoshopped?
Because people see it and they go, oh, this isn't photoshopped.
Are they saying that they put on top of the image to label it?
Saying that makes it a photoshopped image?
They rely on your ignorance.
They rely on your stupidity or your unwillingness to question their baseless assertions.
That Donald Trump can do what we put him in office to do.
And not play nice with these people.
Not treat these people with kid gloves.
But really go above and beyond.
Again, it's like, did we not live through four years of this?
Do we not remember everything they've put us through?
Do we really need to enumerate it again and again and again?
The January 6th political persecution.
The torture.
The literal torture that they put innocent Americans through for peacefully protesting.
They tried to put Donald Trump in jail for life over completely fraudulent charges.
They held kangaroo court show trials where they allowed the prosecution.
To present completely fabricated evidence and never even called the people being accused what would be the defense in a real trial weren't even allowed to explain or to present their argument in any way.
Literally the only limiting factor Should be what's possible.
And the only force working against Trump should be his enemies.
If it's people in his administration, or in the Congress, or anywhere else for that matter, supposedly on our side, advocating for limitations, a soft touch,
let them do that.
Let them do that.
The Democrats exist.
They're out there.
They got plenty of money.
They got plenty of time.
They can try to limit Trump's actions.
The only thing Trump needs to worry about is doing whatever he possibly can.
Whatever he can do.
And if they want to try to interfere and stop it, they're welcome to.
But it should not even enter into consideration for the Trump team.
What the opinion of the Democrats is going to be about any of this stuff.
It doesn't matter.
We're in a life and death struggle for the fate of our country.
Fate of our people.
The continuing existence of this incredibly rare jewel that we find ourselves in possession of.
This historical high point of civilization.
That our ancestors fought to create.
It's all going away.
Unless Trump does what he has to do.
So again, I could not agree more with Asmongold.
This is what we voted for you to do.
This is what we want you to do.
Arrest all of them.
Arrest all of them.
Charge them with the crimes that are committed by the people they let out.
There's a story practically every day.
Of some violent criminal led out by a judge and immediately murders somebody.
Charge the judge with the murder.
Send a signal to the other judges.
Yeah, you better be a little bit more conservative in your sentencing and bail procedures.
There was a woman yesterday arrested for biting a cop.
Attacking a cop and biting him.
The judge decides she's a good girl, didn't do nothing, lets her out on like a $10,000 bond or something just incredibly cheap, which means I think they have to pay like $1,000 or something, just nothing.
Then she goes out and stabs a fireman in the heart and kills him the next day.
You charge that judge.
Charge that judge.
You charge the person who drives the bank robber as a getaway driver, These people could not do what they do without the judge's complicity.
So again, I just...
I don't know.
I trust Trump.
I think he's trying to do the right thing.
And the reason why it's so baffling...
It's not just...
It's not just infuriating, it's confusing and baffling because he tried to shoot Trump in the head.
So, like, how am I going to tell him how serious this is?
Woman charged in deadly stabbing of Kansas City paramedic, previously bit police officer.
I don't think I should have to tell Trump how serious all this is.
They literally tried to shoot him in the face.
He was the one sitting in that courtroom in New York.
So I have to assume that he's doing everything he can, but I don't see the evidence of it.
I really don't.
I really don't see the Trump administration reflecting the change that the rest of America has gone through.
And not being satisfied with following processes that have been designed to prevent Our reclamation of this country.
The only limiting factor should be physical reality.
By which I mean, when the ACLU sues to stop the introduction of some measure that clearly is just not Their prerogative, not their priority.
In fact, I think I will go to a longer video here that explains this fully and how what I'm describing is in fact the way our country is supposed to function.
I guess I'll have to go to it quickly here.
Let me see if I can go to this Tom Homan clip first.
We'll go to Tom Homan clip 15. Here's Homan.
Showing that, you know, these guys are taking it seriously.
So I don't know where the mess up is, but here's Tom Homan.
You don't have to worry about the people that don't like you.
And I'll just say this.
I'm going to go to this video of this woman testifying about the constitutional reality of the power of courts, clip number 10. And I'll play as much as I can here, and then we'll probably continue it into the first five of the next hour, and I'll open up the phone lines for your calls in the next hour.
But I want to be clear what I mean.
The only limitation should be physical reality.
What I mean by that is that a judge's order is not physical reality.
The Supreme Court's orders, they're not physical reality.
Physical reality, like the limitations to our program should be like, we physically can't pack any more people on this plane.
We physically don't have the ability to get any more people out because we're at maximum capacity.
So, genuinely, when it's a judge going, well, the ACLU, the SPLC, has sued to stop you from keeping trans out of the military, the response from the Trump administration should be like, you know what's crazy?
Even with that order, we were still able to get the trans out.
Isn't that nuts?
You would think that order would have stopped us, but no, we went ahead and tried anyway, and it worked.
We got them all out.
Yeah, it turns out that that order...
Didn't actually physically stop us from doing what we want, so good luck next time.
And to a certain extent they're doing it, but they really need to ramp it up.
Again, I'm not talking about embracing dictatorship.
I'm talking about saving this country through the processes as they are supposed to be understood.
We'll go to this video here.
We'll continue it on the other side because we're not going to be able to play the whole thing, but I do want to watch the whole thing because you need to understand.
From a constitutional, historical perspective, this system was never supposed to be set up so that the chief executive of the United States has to have the unanimous consent of 700 appointed judges who aren't even judges and are in fact lifelong Democrat activists put in judge robes in the last three years.
That's not the way the system works.
Judges do not have the ability to override the President of the United States.
They are not the supreme law of the land.
The Constitution is.
That is the only non-physical limitation Trump should even be concerning himself with.
Let's go to this woman.
This is a former litigation lawyer talking about the real role of the judiciary and the executive in our Constitution.
Let's watch.
We've got five minutes.
unidentified
If you would, please make sure your green light is on and then state your name and title for the record.
I'm a retired litigation attorney and I write on the original intent of the Constitution using the Federalist Papers.
I do not go by Supreme Court opinions because for 200 years the Supreme Court has been ignoring The Federalist Papers and the Constitution are framers given, and they have gone off on tangents of their own which have nothing to do with the Constitution.
The Attorney General's opinion begs the question.
He states that states can't nullify acts of the federal government which are authorized by the Constitution.
But then he completely fails to cite article, section, and verse clause where the Constitution delegates to Congress authority to restrict our arms.
We ratified the Constitution.
We created the federal government.
We listed, enumerated every power we granted to our creature, the federal government.
Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 1 through 16 lists most of the powers we delegated to Congress for the government.
For the country at large, we didn't put on our list that our creature could restrict our arms.
We didn't delegate this power to Congress because our framers wanted the American people to be heavily armed.
Alexander Hamilton and James Madison write about this in the Federalist Papers.
In Federalist Paper No.
46, James Madison writes, why the American people are armed?
It is so we can defend ourselves, our communities, and our states from the federal government in the event it becomes tyrannical and oversteps the constitutional limits on its powers.
In Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16, pursuant to that, Congress passed the Militia Act of 1792, where they required every able-bodied male citizen between the ages of...
But I'm going to go back to this video of this constitutional lawyer describing the actual purpose and function of the court system in this country and how they are at this moment usurping power that is not enumerated to them in the Constitution.
It is not their...
Prerogative to step in and demand that every executive order comport with their particular political perspective.
That's absurd.
That's ridiculous.
If they can't physically stop Trump, I don't think he should be paying attention to them really at all at this point.
We have 200 years of Supreme Court opinions, and Mr. Chairman very kindly shared some of these 200 years of Supreme Court opinions, which have nothing to do with the Constitution.
Charles Evans Hughes said, over 100 years ago, Constitution means what the judges say it means.
That has been the prevailing dogma ever since, and generations of lawyers have been indoctrinated with this lie.
That is why we no longer have a federal government which is held down by the chains of the Constitution.
What we have is rule by five, five judges on the Supreme Court who claim the power to do whatever they want to us and our country.
So today we have two opposites, what the Constitution says and what the Supreme Court says.
Well, your oath of office requires you to obey the Constitution, not the Supreme Court.
The Supreme...
The Supreme Court is merely a creature of this Constitution and is completely subject to its terms.
My third point, the AG asserts that the Supreme Court is the exclusive and final authority on the extent of the powers of the federal government.
But our framers knew that Supreme Court judges were as likely as anybody else to be corrupt, usurp powers, and act lawlessly.
The president and the states all have checks on the Supreme Court.
Hamilton shows in Federalist No.
81 that Congress's check on lawless federal judges is to impeach them and remove them from office.
The president has his oath of office.
As a check on the Supreme Court.
The President's oath is to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution.
It is not to obey the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court was not set up in our Constitution as the superior branch of the federal government.
And then there's no need for me to...
Well, Madison says in his report on the Virginia Resolutions that it is a plain principle founded in common sense that the states, as the sovereign parties to the Constitution, are the final authority on whether the federal government has violated the Constitution and that we may,
that the states may...
Check all three branches of the federal government, not just...
They may check the judiciary, the executive, and the legislative branches by nullifying their acts.
If the judicial branch connives with other branches in usurping powers, our Constitution will be destroyed if we do not stop them.
This is what James Madison said in...
Here's notes in his report on the Virginia Resolution.
I'm sorry I didn't have time to finish.
I hope that during questions someone will ask me about the so-called nullification crisis of 1832.
It's like you're at the park, you know, going down a slide or something, and a woman comes up and is like, sir, your child is too young to go down that slide.
If you were watching the War Room yesterday or the American Journal earlier today, you have seen a clip of Alex Jones breaking into the War Room studio and sharing the news that InfoWars is not dead yet.
We're not dead yet.
The struggle continues.
The fight goes on.
And again, I wish...
I wish it wasn't like this.
I wish we could have known a year ago and just told you, yeah, you know what, we'll be good for a year.
But that was never a foregone conclusion.
And in fact, if we hadn't fought back, filed counter suits, confronted them on their own ground using the same weapons they were trying to use to destroy us.
To defend ourselves and go after them, then we would have been shut down a year ago.
If we hadn't been proactive in this, we absolutely would have been shut down, shuttered, and closed a year ago.
I've said it a million times.
They buy their own bullcrap.
They believe their own lies.
They really think that they're going to come in and intimidate and Bureaucratize us.
They're going to befuddle and confuse and circumvent us by wielding complicated legal procedures.
Little do they know, they're in the lion's den now.
And we don't have to just sit back and let them do this.
And we're not scared of what they think they can pull.
They really, really don't know who they're fighting.
They really don't know who they're fighting.
They've made the first...
They violated the first rule of war, which is know your enemy.
And they have a cartoonish, fraudulent view of who InfoWars is, what we are, what we're about.
I've had it in my personal life even.
Friends of mine who are like, what is Harrison doing?
Why is he working for Infowars?
He must just be using them as a platform and he's going to move on and just use his position.
I don't know how to explain things like loyalty and principle to people that don't have them.
I don't know who else to explain this.
That's why at the end of the show yesterday I played that video of the guy confronting the clown.
And people were mocking me for that too because I said, you know, this is what it's like hosting an Infowars show.
But that video was posted where it's like you have no idea the power of like not giving a damn.
Right?
The idea is that you're walking down an alley and you see this creepy looking clown menacing you.
And like you...
You know, you think you want to run away.
But when you have either extreme confidence like we do in the righteousness of our cause and the correctness of our arguments and the reality of the way we see the world, there's nothing you can do to try to intimidate us.
There's nothing you can do that's going to freak us out and make us run away.
And what do you think is going through that clown's mind the moment The guy he's trying to scare instead stands up straight, squares up, and balls his hands into fists.
Right?
I'm telling you, it's like you've got this glow.
They're just like, we're just going to crush him.
We're just going to stomp him out of existence.
We're going to stop him making money.
And then they're going to go do something else because that's all that they're really about.
They're all just lying and trying to trick people for money.
They make that argument over and over again.
In the court case, and it's like, you genuinely don't understand what we're doing this for.
You don't know what it's like to be the type of person that, like, you can take everything from us.
We're still going to do this.
It's just, I don't know how to explain that to you.
I really don't.
I know you're in the world.
You're of the mindset that, like, everything you do is a scam.
Everything you do...
Is just trying to screw people over and trying to get one over on everybody and trying to, you know, screw everybody else while benefiting yourself.
I can understand that mindset.
I can project or model that mindset and empathize with it in a purely theoretical way.
Do you have the ability to do the other?
Do you have the ability to model a mindset?
That genuinely doesn't care about what you can do to us physically or monetarily?
Do you have the ability to do that?
And so you just picture the new world order, the clown world, thinking they can frighten us into submission, beat us down.
And again, you've got to imagine this guy.
He's doing these pranks.
He's dressing up like a clown.
And I'm sure 99% of the times he steps out from behind the corner and people just scream and run.
He probably gets a rush out of it and it feels really good.
You can only imagine the ice water shooting through his veins when the person he's trying to intimidate and frighten instead smiles back at him and squares up and is like, I get to beat up a clown today.
That clown suddenly is like, oh crap.
Oh crap!
It's not working.
This psychology isn't bending to my will.
Yeah, it turns out they're just badass clowns.
There's nothing behind it.
There is no supernatural power granting them authority over us.
And when you just stand up and walk right back at them...
Suddenly it's all, oh, it's just a prank, bro.
It's just a prank.
We're filming for Utah.
I'm not a real clown.
I'm just kidding.
That was funny, huh?
So that's how it feels.
That really is how it feels to know that we've got all of these despicable people trying desperately to destroy us, and they're incapable because they cannot imagine a mindset like ours.
And it really imparts a feeling of invulnerability and of
Pull down the audio because he is getting called names here.
The phone goes down.
Yeah, I mean, look.
These are paid protesters.
And he should.
He should, honestly.
You're exactly right.
He's got to file a police report.
And we could actually figure some stuff out here because I'll tell you.
At this point, everybody should be able to recognize a paid astroturfed organization rally.
They all have exactly the same pre-printed signs, no organic, you know, this wasn't an organic protest where a bunch of people made their own signs to go express themselves.
They all showed up at a, you know, allotted time, were handed out a t-shirt and a sign, told to go somewhere and cheer at the right times.
And then you notice that the moment he speaks up, You hear people start, immediately start chanting, USA, USA.
And I mean, this goes back to when I first became aware of this tactic was when Hillary Clinton was stealing the election from Bernie Sanders during the DNC in 2016.
And you had all these Bernie supporters who would interrupt speeches or start chanting.
And the whole crowd, all of the Hillary delegates were told, like, whenever anybody starts saying, you immediately start chanting, USA, USA, to try to drown them out.
And you can hear people immediately start chanting USA, USA.
That's a training tactic that leftist organizations are told to engage in, where the instant somebody starts speaking up or whatever, heckling you, everybody starts chanting USA, USA to drown them out.
So again, what we're seeing here is professional protesters actually physically attacking Jack Posobiec, apparently knocking him to the ground and at least knocking his phone out of his hands because he asked why.
Why they lost the popular vote.
Great stuff.
I mean, we need more of this.
In fact, there's another video that went totally viral yesterday of Valentine Gomez.
What's her name?
Valentina Gomez interrupted a Muslim rally at the Texas State Capitol.
Another very powerful video.
We can show you that one in just a second.
But final thoughts on this, Leslie.
Thank you for calling in and telling us about this.
I didn't realize.
How intense that video was.
unidentified
Yeah, well, the reason why it sparked my attention is because tonight is Walpurgisnacht.
It's the witch's high holiday in Germany.
This is not to be underestimated.
Tomorrow is Beltane.
It is one of the biggest holidays on the pagan calendar.
It is, in fact, a sex holiday about procreation and increase.
And this is the holiday that they're going to use to try and seed new members, to seed new ideas.
They're going to be launching a lot of new attacks.
And they're going to be, this is a spiritual war, magicwars.com, but it's C-K, magicwars.com, because it is a magical war that's going on.
And you people need a witch on the inside who knows what witches do and know how to counteract them.
You need an insider.
I'm your insider.
I'm a witch.
I've been a witch for decades.
I know exactly what they're getting ready to plan.
They're planning big stuff, and they're going to use sexuality to do it.
And anybody who's, unfortunately...
They know how to hijack us.
And anybody who's having sex tonight or tomorrow night is going to have their energy hijacked.
And I know it doesn't seem like each individual person can be tapped, but it's possible.
Because these democratic networks are also hooked in to the old pagan networks.
This is part of where they're getting their power.
This is part of why they were able to knock Jack the Soviet down.
Because it's that time when they have...
This power.
And so prayer warriors are, yeah, while Pergus knocked, prayer warriors are going to have to stand up and put up that hedge of protection around Trump.
I've seen posts from, like, witchcraft reddits where it's like, they're like, I tried to curse Trump and it didn't work.
There's something protecting him.
So, yeah, I appreciate you calling in and, I don't know, I just...
You don't need witchcraft to access this stuff, Leslie.
So I don't know.
I would warn you against thinking you can entertain that stuff without opening yourself up to some pretty demented influences.
But I do appreciate what you're saying about having to know how these people think or having to be on the inside or at least have an understanding of what they think they're capable of doing because it informs.
There are actions that actually affect us.
So it's not just Walpurgis Night.
It's May Day as well.
It's a big communist holiday as well.
So there's that to be concerned about.
And of course, our friend of the show, Mike Shelby at Grey Zone, has been publishing what he's discovered, again, from being on the inside of these leftist organizations and how they're planning to carry out big disruptions during May Day.
So a lot of things.
Coalescing tomorrow to be a big spiritual and political conflict.
Thank you so much for the call, Leslie.
I really do appreciate it.
Let's go to this video, actually, because this is another.
It's Valentina Gomez.
I believe I have that in the folder today.
Did not I put it in there?
Clip number 21. So this was an Islamic event at the Texas Capitol.
And I gotta say, the best part of this, and I'd love to know the story of how this started, but the best part is that in the first one second of the video, she's approaching the podium and she has a headdress on.
She's got the Muslim scarf around her head and she rips it off and starts going off about Islamic influence in Texas.
So here's Valentina Gomez.
Doing a really brave thing and confronting and disrupting this Muslim gathering at the Texas Capitol.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Islam is the religion of rape, incisive pedophilia, where they bowed down to a stupid rock and it's all wrong.
I see people on, she's just, she's, this is just a publicity stunt.
It's like, okay, yeah, of course it is.
She's just trying to get elected.
It's like, yeah.
Is that not what you want your representatives doing?
Do you not want your representatives putting themselves on the front line speaking out against this stuff publicly?
I love it.
I love seeing it.
And I just do love...
I mean, it's symbolic, right?
It's this idea that they're all expecting her to go...
She must have been in disguise, because nobody's, like, stopping her, and she rips the headscarf off.
People worship a stupid rock.
They do do that, though.
I mean, but that is what they...
They do worship a rock, so...
So there you go.
So that's freedom of religion.
In this country.
God bless it.
Let's go to Steve in Alaska now.
Steve, thanks for calling in about Trump's agenda.
Go ahead.
You're on the air.
unidentified
So we talk about Trump a lot, and we talk about his failings, right?
But we don't highlight the fact that he sent $18 billion to Israel in his first 100 days, yet sent zero to the Carolinas, which are ruined.
That's America.
He sent zero to Maui.
Which is America.
He needs to quit putting the Zionists and other countries first and quit worrying about the deal and start taking care of Americans like he promised to do.
Okay, so you're not talking about us when you say we aren't talking about these things.
unidentified
No, no, no.
I'm talking about mainstream media mainly.
You guys talk about it.
But you guys are like one of the only outlets that outlines the fact that Trump does it.
And a lot of these other outlets that people listen to, podcasts, etc., they will say small stuff.
They don't want to get labeled as anti-Semitic.
Oh, my God.
God forgive me if I violate the fact that Israel is a terrorist state and that they've attacked America and their so-called greatest ally that's done nothing for us.
I had somebody respond yesterday when I reached the governor and said, you know, The Jews don't have a right to basically force their religion, force us to support and pay for their religious institutions.
This is a violation of the separation of church and state.
And somebody responded saying, you're just anti-Semitic.
And it's like, my response to that is, well, you're just saying that because it's the Jews doing it.
I'm not saying it because the Jews doing it.
I'm saying it because it's a religious institution or a foreign state that is hijacking our politics and robbing our people to pay for their own initiatives.
I don't care who it is that's doing it.
I'm going to be against it.
And if it was the Catholics doing it, I'd be saying it.
If it's the Muslims doing it, I'll say it.
If it's the Episcopalians doing it, I'm against it.
Hell, we haven't heard much of the anti-Christian task force so far, right?
But I'm against that too, right?
So it's just funny that people go, you're just saying that because you're anti-Semitic.
My response to that is, well, you're just saying that because it's Jews doing it.
I'm saying it because I'm a principled American who believes in the First Amendment.
And understands that the freedom of religion, actually the whole, kind of one of the main points of freedom of religion is that you get to criticize and not be a part of a religion.
That was the danger.
The danger before was that the state would force you to be in their religion and would, you know, discriminate against and harm the other religions for the benefit of the state religion they adopted.
So, like, criticizing Israel, criticizing Jews or Judaism, Or the institution, whatever it is, that is actually the heart of the First Amendment and the five freedoms, you know, specifically the one of those five freedoms that concerns,
you know, religion and your freedom to worship or criticize as you see fit.
These things are married together.
So, yeah, I completely agree, Steve, and it's frustrating, and I've, again, explained many times that, like, it's not even that it's so egregious, it's that it's the ease with which Israel gets what it wants, and the hoops and the caveats and everything America wants has to be subject to judicial review,
and it can't quite happen, and the money's not there, and then Israel wants something, and it's like, boom, $100 billion check on your desk the next day.
So it's not even necessarily Trump's doing all this for Israel.
I wouldn't even necessarily care about it.
Definitely not nearly as much if...
It was just like a part of a massive thing that America's getting everything it wants and Israel's getting stuff.
It's like, that's fine.
But America's not getting what it wants.
Israel is.
We got an issue.
We got a problem.
And then you got Texas governor doing it and forcing a small town to pay Israel.
Momentarily, I did just drop in another video just to remind ourselves of what we're talking about when I read this headline about 60 Minutes.
So Trump, of course, is suing 60 Minutes for $20 billion after they deceptively edited an interview with Kamala Harris and got caught.
Yeah, it's one of these things, right?
This story is so incredible.
You've got the producer of 60 Minutes quitting because he's like, they're not letting me be independent.
But really, it's because when they let you be independent, you tried to deceive the entire United States and rig the election and committed fraud and then got caught because you accidentally published the real interview in addition to the highly edited version.
It's just totally fraudulent in and of itself.
Then you've got sort of the the fact that this wasn't a one-off and like there are threads people are making now comparing what people were saying about Biden's cognitive abilities and like they're genuinely gaslighting people so hard.
I mean they are out there saying we never said Joe Biden was competent.
Or he was competent and his incompetence was just a right-wing conspiracy theory until the debate and then it became real news.
And then you're allowed to report on it.
But before that, it was a dangerous right-wing conspiracy theory cheap fake.
It's just like, what are we talking about here?
I mean, we all understand exactly what happened, right?
We all understand that for years, Joe Biden was incompetent.
In the very beginning, Joe Biden was A complete mess.
And every time he went out in public, it was embarrassing fumble after faux pas after gaffe.
Constant.
They constantly covered up.
They constantly downplayed it.
They constantly hit him away or made excuses or told you straight up that it was fake, the video that you saw, even though it was unedited and raw and live.
So it's just the level of gaslighting, the level of lying these people are capable of is really unimaginable.
Really unimaginable.
Like it's unimaginable when it's happening, but then when it's all exposed and it all blows up in their face and they have no reason to keep lying, but they still keep lying and they still try to tell you that the sky isn't blue and that you didn't see what you saw and you didn't hear what you heard and they make us go back and...
Find the clips of them lying and play them and then they still don't write.
I mean, this is why I spent so long on that video of the guy being asked if he gave his family jobs.
It's like, it's true.
We know it's true.
So why are they lying?
Like, what are they doing?
And how are they getting away with it?
And how are the American people not insulted at this?
Every time one of these lefties claims that they didn't know that Biden was incompetent.
They're calling you stupid.
Like, that's all you should be hearing.
And they're like, the media, we did a great job, and his condition was hidden from us by his aides, and we're mad at them for doing that.
All you should be hearing, the babble fish in your ear should be translating that into, you're a stupid idiot, right?
You have the memory of a goldfish, don't you?
You don't remember the last year and a half, do you?
Because you're an idiot retard that I can take advantage of, that I can lie to their face out of just sheer disrespect for them?
That's all you should be hearing because that's all they're saying to you.
Things are so crazy now.
I really struggle to even express how monumentally, universally dishonest these people are.
And it really is.
Not something I feel like I should have to describe.
But alas, but alas, they persist.
So I guess I have to keep confronting it.
So the news from 60 Minutes is that they have opted to settle their argument with Donald Trump.
Well, that's convenient.
Well, isn't that convenient?
I noticed that...
There is no arbitrarily applied default judgment in this case.
I notice that there's no attempt from The Onion to purchase 60 Minutes because they've been forced into bankruptcy.
I can't help but notice that the president of CBS hasn't had his cars repossessed and his home forced into sale so that he can pay the bankruptcy charges.
I can't help but notice that the actual political activity of CBS blatantly spreading falsehoods, blatantly lying to the American people in a deliberate attempt to sway the outcome of an election, a fundamental betrayal of not just their role as the media,
but our constitutional republic as it stands.
I can't help but notice that they're getting off a hell of a lot easier than Alex Jones saying, This looks a bit suspicious about all of the highly suspicious evidence around a mass murder 10 years ago.
I just, I can't help but notice that CBS still exists and is no threat of being shut down.
So, that's a little odd to me, but fine.
They're settling this $20 billion lawsuit, and I just want to play this video to remind you of why they should be destroyed.
Oh, yeah, I forgot to mention the question that they added is a question about Israel because, God forbid, we have a political story that doesn't have Israeli corruption at the heart of it.
I mean, God forbid that we are able to talk about...
Some sort of domestic inter-American squabble without Israel being again at the heart of it.
It's just, it's like, my God.
Oh, my God.
But I'm so, I'm sorry.
I'm sorry to everybody that wants me to stop talking about Israel.
It's not my fault.
I swear to God, it's not my fault.
Yeah, forgot about that part as well.
Sorry, so let's go back.
But I just, I feel like I, it's like, really?
Every time?
Is it every single time?
It is, isn't it?
Every single time.
Okay, sorry.
Let's go back.
Let's go back to the video edited by CBS News, edited by 60 Minutes to make Kamala Harris look good.
And it just by happenstance and sheer coincidence just happens to be the question about America's support of Israel.
Can we ever get away from our greatest allies?
My God.
Let's watch.
unidentified
But it seems that Prime Minister Netanyahu is not listening.
Listen, in all this chaos and unhappiness going on, I just want the audience, I want to share with the audience somebody I found on X. And, by the way, X is where it's at.
A spiritual and physical war for the fate of humanity.
So, while at the same time that we don't take this stuff lightly, it's one of the strengths of Alex Jones that even just recognizing meme culture and the power that it has or willing to let himself sort of be a butt of the joke, not taking it seriously and just embracing the meme culture and saying,
yeah, do it.
Whatever you have to do.
Take our stuff.
Chop it up.
Make us look funny.
Give us funny voices.
It doesn't matter, man.
Just get the information out there.
Spread the awareness.
Spread the memes with all you've got because that is quite literally how we've won our advances to this point.
They're very funny images.
They're very funny images, I have to admit.
Alex Groans.
Okay, well, I don't know him, but I'll give him my tentative approval as of now.
Thank you so much for the call, Julie.
Let's go to Eli in Ohio.
Talking about lawfare.
Go ahead.
Eli, you're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison.
Hey, so Trump really doesn't have that much time to get stuff done.
I mean, if we're being honest, he probably only has until the midterms unless we pull something out.
These arrests of these judges for harboring criminals and illegal aliens is a good start, but he's just going to have to be the bad guy and just go even further, especially with...
The officials in the Pentagon trying to plan a coup against him.
I mean, he's just going to have to come out and start arresting a lot of these people because, you know, when he's out, they're just going to be coming after all of us.
So he just needs to get it done, be called the bad guy for a little bit, and that's...
The doctor's not the bad guy for giving you chemotherapy, right?
It's like, yeah, you can point to the doctor and go, he made my hair fall out and he made me feel nauseous and weak.
How dare he?
He's such a bad guy.
And it's like, no, the doctor's curing your cancer.
The doctor is helping you extricate the thing that's actually literally killing you.
So he's not even being a bad guy.
Like, yeah, the cancer cells don't like him, right?
Sure, the parasites are mad at the exterminator, but like...
That's where we're at.
This is a matter of life and death for our nation in a very real, literal, tangible way.
Not in a theoretical, not in a potential way.
If we don't win, the next election they can rig, the next Democrat they can put into power, the next rhino Republican they can fraudulently insert into the office is giving amnesty to 40,000
migrants.
The demographic, you know, swamping has occurred.
We'll never be America again.
Like, this is it.
We have a chance with Trump to save the country.
Without total, absolute, 100% success, with our enemies crushed into non-existence politically, then what was the point of any of this?
I completely agree with you.
It's just like, don't even give them the framing of Trump has to be the bad guy.
Trump has to be the hero.
He has to be the superhero.
He has to be the good guy.
He has to be the doctor curing the cancer.
He has to be the Superman punching the robbers.
You're not a bad guy for punching robbers.
You're not a bad guy for killing the cancer cells.
So, we're saving the country here, and the methods necessary to do this...
It might be painful to the scumbags that are trying to destroy us.
Boo-hoo.
Right?
So I get what you're saying, Eli.
I just, I don't even call him the bad guy.
He needs to be heavy-handed.
He needs to be strident, stalwart.
But, yeah, the only people he's hurting are the bad people that are trying to kill us.
So, F them, to put it politely.
You see what I'm saying, Eli?
I'm sorry, they must have pulled you down.
unidentified
Go ahead.
So the media has done a very, very good job, and especially all these government officials, saying that he has no authority to do anything.
That's why we have these judges telling him that he's not allowed to do anything, that we're supposed to be ruled by these judges.
And he's just going to have to come out and say, you know, you guys need to quit, or I'm going to come out and come after you.
Especially...
You know, with the sanctuary cities and their funding, that's a good start to defund them.
But if they continue to not listen, he's just going to have to go in there and start making arrests.
And look, I've talked about it, and again, I warn against it.
I don't want this to actually happen, but between this and dying, I mean, I don't know what the function is of removing a mayor and just appointing a federal overseer to a city or something, but...
I mean, if you have mayors just deliberately countermanning the—I mean, I don't know.
Abe Lincoln arrested the whole Maryland legislature during the Civil War.
There's precedent out there, right?
When it comes to the fate of the union and its preservation, extraordinary measures can and must be taken.
So do it.
Do it.
Trump, do it.
And, you know, there's a couple ways to think about this.
I've already used the illustration of, like, just the woman at the park that just doesn't want you doing something.
Even though she has no authority or right to tell you anything.
Like, you're not bothering her, but she's just like, um, excuse me.
Excuse me, sir.
That slide is not safe for your child.
You are not allowed to do it.
And it's just like, are you going to stop me?
Are you going to stop me?
So I'm not going to stop me.
I'm going to keep letting my kid go down the slide.
Who the hell are you?
And where do you think you get the authority to tell me anything, lady?
Like, that's the way the judges need to be treated.
Okay, Trump's removing trans from the military.
Some random person is like, I don't think you should.
It's like, okay, thanks for letting us know.
And you just keep doing it.
They don't have any authority, so it doesn't matter.
The other aspect of this, I should bring it in.
I always think of the video of Mike Lindell.
He's doing a deposition.
He's being so mean to the lawyer.
He's like bullying the crap out of this lawyer.
The lawyer's being very polite and very, oh, sir, I'm just...
I'm, you know, I watch these videos.
We've played it before.
If you haven't seen it, you gotta see it.
It's the best entertainment you'll ever see.
Mike Lindell deposition on YouTube.
And he's yelling at the guy and he's just, in fact, we don't have much time today.
Maybe I'll just have to play tomorrow.
But I'm always surprised because in the comments of these things, they're like, oh, this guy's such a jerk.
He's being so rude.
And it's like, no, no, no.
The rude thing is to file a fraudulent case against him that's trying to destroy his company.
And to try to charge him millions of dollars and force him to pay tens of thousands of dollars to lawyers to beat off these charges and having to go to a deposition and be questioned by some snot-nosed lawyer who can manipulate the legal system into forcing him to do this.
That's the rude thing.
Calling that guy names?
Not showing that guy deference and respect?
That's not mean.
That's the most merciful thing, most merciful reaction this guy deserves.
Again, the framing of this is important.
The optics are important.
The mean thing, the bad guys, the mean thing they did was destroy our country and flood our cities with illegal immigrants who rape and kill innocent American people, who deal drugs,
they kill hundreds of thousands of American people, who waste hundreds of billions of our taxpayer dollars.
To their own dependent lifestyle.
That's the mean thing.
It's nice to get rid of these people.
It's nice to get rid of the judges that are preventing their expulsion.
It's nice and beneficial and beneficent and merciful to jail criminals and execute murderers and expel invaders.
Is it mean to the invaders?
I guess.
Just like it's mean to call lawyers bad names.
When the lawyers are there to destroy your life because they hate you personally, calling them names is the nicest possible response they deserve.
Okay?
Deporting these people is the nicest, most merciful reaction we could possibly have and still be a country.
Asylum seekers.
They should be seeking asylum from us.
Okay?
That's all I'm saying.
All I'm saying is that they should be seeking asylum from us.
They should be desperate to leave.
These people, they should be self-deporting, you know, by the millions.
In sheer desperation to get out before Trump gets them.
And we sell antique arms and armor, and we have a sale coming, May 17th, auctionsimperial.com.
And if you ever want to get the real deal, I don't know if your stuff's replica or not, but you'd be surprised how the real thing is somehow, inexplicably, often more affordable than replica.
And what I love about the Japanese swords is like...
I mean, they're literally, like, fantasy-level arms.
I mean, you're talking about Lord of the Rings-level stuff, where it's like, you find a particular sword.
My sword was the favorite sword of Oda Nobunaga.
And, like, you read it, and it's like, this sword was forged by this guy a thousand years ago, and then it was, you know, wielded by this guy to kill this emperor, and then this, you know, then it was passed down to his great-great-great-grandson, who used it in this rebellion, and it's like, they're like these, these, like...
Anyway, they're like a thousand years old, and they are legendary in a very real way.
Way to get me off course and on a different topic.
Stay tuned, folks.
Alex Jones, 90 Seconds.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.