Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Ross Schwab, Mr. Eat the Bugs, you'll own nothing, be happy, a bust of linen on his desk. | ||
He first resigns as the chairman. | ||
He's still on the board. | ||
Then he gets off the board a month ago and I said, watch, I predict he'll be completely gone and kicked out of it. | ||
Following my recent announcement that I am into my 88th year, I have decided to step down from the position of chair as a member of the board of trustees with imminent effect. | ||
He's out of the WEF because... | ||
All the big money is cut off by Trump. | ||
He was getting out of USA and the EPA and other groups. | ||
And people don't want to go to it now. | ||
And attendance is way down because it's identified as an enemy. | ||
To bring people together for an informal dialogue in a remote Swiss village such as Davos can be or should be a good recipe to restore trust. | ||
Two years ago, the UN had a resolution, not by the General Assembly, but by the real corporate board of the UN, to make it co-equal with the UN in all policy. | ||
Well, it was always really that, the mouth of the globalists, where the real decisions were being made. | ||
And then more importantly, it's just Bilderberg's public mouth. | ||
It then makes the statements and externalizes the plan for global governance. | ||
It has their big global government conferences. | ||
unidentified
|
So people assume we are just going back to the good old world which we had and everything will be normal again. | |
This is, let's say, a victory. | ||
We have to understand that these are people that are very smart, they're very well resourced, and they have a very sort of strategic idea of how they want to see the world develop. | ||
And God... | ||
And a soul are not part of that strategy. | ||
You expose their project, and as it goes from beta to operational in 2020, it'll be so horrible, everyone will turn against it. | ||
I said that thousands of times the last two decades, and it happened. | ||
All the corporate media would do is say, oh, it doesn't exist. | ||
There's no global government. | ||
There's no New World Order. | ||
There's no... | ||
Global governance conferences. | ||
There's no plan to ban your gas stoves and cut your son's genitals off. | ||
There's no plan to ban most farming. | ||
unidentified
|
We can't get to net zero. | |
We don't get this job done. | ||
Unless agriculture is front and center is part of the solution. | ||
There's no plan to get rid of the borders. | ||
Yeah, there is. | ||
There's no plan to use viruses for total control. | ||
Yeah, there are. | ||
We named them all. | ||
That when they finally took off the mask and went from operation... | ||
Agenda 21 to Agenda 2030 in 2020 like they said they would. | ||
I mean, they said in all those documents, the SPARS 2020 and Operation Lockstep and the actual treaty plan. | ||
We are going to go operational in 2020. | ||
I kept telling you, if you think stuff's been bad so far, you just wait till 2020. | ||
And they say their main thing will be a new virus. | ||
unidentified
|
This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. | |
This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts, to reimagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change. | ||
At the end, what the fourth industrial revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, our digital and... | ||
All biological identities. | ||
Oh, let's put a new head globalist in that looks and acts like a James Bond villain. | ||
unidentified
|
I am Peter Barbeck Lathmet. | |
I have a right to rule. | ||
I am the Ubermension. | ||
I am the Superman. | ||
unidentified
|
I am the leader. | |
I control you. | ||
We'll kill you. | ||
We'll kill you with the shots and the food. | ||
It cuts it all off. | ||
So we sit on mountaintop with prostitutes and our private jets, like fat pigs, selling you, you. | ||
We send out Obama to Africa to tell them you don't get car, air conditioning, you kill the earth. | ||
We're going to teach all of you to starve and die. | ||
We are superior to you. | ||
There's nothing you can do to stop us. | ||
Klaus Schwab fully leaving is because they think that'll give them a makeover. | ||
No, it won't. | ||
The WEF is irrevocably destroyed and convicted for crimes against humanity and conspiring for a global technocracy, for pushing an anti-human depopulation agenda. | ||
But now we're into their counter response. | ||
So this is a race, a race to finish them off politically, to destroy them in the public eye. | ||
unidentified
|
Don't just destroy Bill Gates, don't just destroy Klaus Schwab. | |
Go after all of their kingpins, all of their mouthpieces. | ||
Politically expose them. | ||
unidentified
|
*Mario plays* | |
It's Wednesday, April 23rd in the year of our Lord, 2025. | ||
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
I think it's time to blow this thing and get everybody in the stuff together. | ||
Okay, three, two, one, let's jam. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from the InfoWars headquarters. | ||
unidentified
|
This Wednesday, April the 23rd. | |
And we are still here for now. | ||
We don't know what comes next. | ||
But I'm very happy to be here with you. | ||
We have a lot of stuff to cover today. | ||
I'm going to be going over Jordan Peterson's appearance on Joe Rogan yesterday. | ||
This has become a major topic of conversation. | ||
And it's frankly hilarious. | ||
And we're going to confront it because obviously there's a lot of division going on. | ||
On the right right now. | ||
And frankly, I don't want to say strongly disagree with Jordan Peterson, but we're certainly going to laugh at his ideas. | ||
So we'll do that. | ||
We're also going to talk about South Africa a little bit and the town of Orania, which is a white-only conclave or a... | ||
You know, white-only town in South Africa that is currently under attack by the South African government. | ||
And I want to get into that a little bit since I don't think we've talked about it too much on this show before. | ||
It's a very interesting and elucidating part of the world. | ||
We have a lot of political stuff to talk about as well. | ||
Negotiations over Ukraine, hitting some road bumps. | ||
And of course, just your typical anti-human depopulation agenda activity as always. | ||
And we'll be joined in the 10 o'clock hour by Invisible Inquiry, who is going to lay out the universe of anti-human activity being carried out by the likes of USAID, or at least using that as a hub, | ||
launching from there and uncovering the literal depopulation agenda going on right now. | ||
And I guess just to start off, it is worth reminding everybody that at the end of the day, it's all about control. | ||
I was just watching a video right before the show started of Nick Fuentes talking about how America is dying, but it didn't die, it was killed, and how it's being killed by policy. | ||
And describing the way that free trade gutted the small towns. | ||
Put them into economic spirals, downward spirals they really never got out of, deaths of despair, and people moving to the cities. | ||
And I thought, you know, you have to ask the question why. | ||
Why would they even want that? | ||
I mean, why would the people in power design a policy to eradicate small towns, drive, you know, the rural populations of America into depression and recession? | ||
What would be the purpose of that? | ||
After all, it's all about control. | ||
Certainly there are better ways to control people than to shut the factory down in their town and let their town become a decaying husk of what it once was. | ||
But the answer is simple. | ||
It's because people in cities are easier to control. | ||
And I feel like that's a part of the plan that we haven't touched on recently, is that depopulating the rural, the countrysides, is a key component. | ||
Drive everybody into cities where you can control them, where you can keep them in little boxes, monitor, surveil, and trap them if need be. | ||
So it's worth sort of, I think, taking a bird's eye view and looking at everything that's gone on. | ||
Because, of course, he's exactly right. | ||
I mean, America has been killed. | ||
And, you know, we've been singing that tune for the last 30 years, letting everybody know. | ||
And I saw something similar yesterday. | ||
I can't remember who. | ||
Captive Dreamer, I think, on X. And I think he was talking about mass immigration. | ||
Reflecting something that, you know, I've talked about quite a bit, and I retweeted something from 2023 that I put out. | ||
But it's simply that things don't just happen. | ||
Like, mass immigration didn't just happen. | ||
The rise in LGBTQ propaganda, it didn't just happen. | ||
None of this stuff just happens. | ||
These are policy outcomes. | ||
These are deliberate. | ||
These are decisions being made by human beings. | ||
And as long as you're aware of that, as long as the conception in your mind is, this is being done to me, not this is just happening, then you've taken the first step towards being a fully conscious human being. | ||
Because then you at least have the option whether to participate or not. | ||
You're not just going along with the herd and... | ||
Doing whatever it is other people want you to do without even knowing that you're being manipulated. | ||
But hopefully all of this will become clearer the more as we get into all of today's news. | ||
So let's just start. | ||
Here it is, your Daily Dispatch. | ||
All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Wednesday, the 23rd of April, 2025. | ||
Experiments to dim the sun will be approved within weeks. | ||
Experiments to dim sunlight to fight global warming will be given the green light by the government within weeks. | ||
Oh, so they're using global warming again, are they? | ||
Okay, I'm sorry. | ||
I thought we stopped calling it global warming because it wasn't global warming. | ||
But now you need to justify dimming the sun like a supervillain from The Simpsons. | ||
And so suddenly it's global warming again. | ||
Great. Amazing how arbitrary all of this is. | ||
Outdoor field trials, which could include injecting aerosols into the atmosphere or brightening clouds to reflect sunshine, are being considered by scientists as a way to prevent runaway climate change. | ||
ARIA, the government's advanced research and invention funding agency, has set aside 50 million pounds for projects, which will be announced in the coming weeks. | ||
Professor Mark Sims, the program director for ARIA, Said there will be a small controlled outdoor experiment on particular approaches. | ||
We'll be announcing who we'll be given funding to in a few weeks. | ||
When we do so, we'll be making clear when any outdoor experiments might be taking place. | ||
One of the missing pieces in this debate was physical data from the real world. | ||
Models can only tell us so much. | ||
And they're always wrong, so there's that. | ||
Everything we do is going to be safe by design. | ||
We're absolutely committed to responsible research, including responsible outdoor research. | ||
Yeah, don't worry, folks. | ||
They're responsibly dimming the sun. | ||
They're responsibly spraying particles into the air to block out sunlight in an irreversible fashion. | ||
But don't worry. | ||
It'll be responsible. | ||
Again, this is not something you can undo. | ||
They're unleashing forces on the world that cannot be easily recalled. | ||
As bad as things like COVID were, you could always reject the vaccine yourself. | ||
As bad as the lockdowns and things like that were, they would always end at a certain point. | ||
When you start making clouds brighter to dim the sun, which I don't even, I mean, isn't the whole thing that it's a greenhouse gas situation and that sunlight comes into the atmosphere? | ||
And then goes up and then gets reflected back down, creating a greenhouse effect. | ||
Wouldn't brightening clouds make that worse? | ||
I mean, does any of this make any sense? | ||
It's just, it's completely insane. | ||
They're literally dimming the sun. | ||
unidentified
|
Wait till you get to the part where they admit that the fumes that come off ships that contain sulfur dioxide actually cool the planet. | |
Then it'll really start making sense. | ||
Is that in this article? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. | |
Go to the shipping fumes. | ||
Maybe we'll just set this aside. | ||
unidentified
|
I'll read this for you. | |
I got it right here. | ||
Shipping fumes. | ||
In recent decades, experts noticed that clouds above shipping routes were far brighter than usual as pollution caused them to become more reflective, bringing an overall dimming effect. | ||
This cooling from shipping fumes was so marked that when the international regulations were enacted to curb sulfur dioxide emissions in 2020, it caused a spike in global warming for scientists fully. | ||
unidentified
|
Is it making sense yet? | |
I think we just added another reason to go to war with Britain. | ||
I think that's what makes sense, is invading Britain and A, freeing its people from the satanic cabal that currently enslaves them. | ||
And B, stopping them from literally destroying the Earth like mad scientist supervillains. | ||
What are we going to do about this, folks? | ||
What are we going to do about this? | ||
My God. | ||
Perfidious Albion, up to it again. | ||
Meanwhile, again from the EU. | ||
Poison of the world. | ||
EU fines Apple 500 million euros and Meta 200 million euro for breaking Europe's digital rules. | ||
This goes hand in hand with all the other stories that we've talked about over the last few weeks and have more today of the EU just desperately trying everything it can to stop people from talking. | ||
Just it's so desperate to shut its people up, you know, for democracy. | ||
You know, for the sake of democracy, they're just frantically. | ||
Trying everything they possibly can to silence forever the voices of their people. | ||
The European Union imposed a 500 million euro fine on Apple for preventing app makers from guiding users to cheaper options outside its app store. | ||
Meta was fined 200 million pounds for requiring users to choose between ads or paying to avoid them. | ||
These fines were issued under the EU's Digital Markets Act, which aims to give citizens control over their data and allow businesses to communicate freely. | ||
Like the best. | ||
unidentified
|
That's the best. | |
I love that. | ||
These fines were issued over the EU's Digital Markets Act, which aims to give citizens control over their data and allow businesses to communicate freely. | ||
Hey guys, we gotta have this law set so that our people can communicate freely, so you can have power and control over your own data. | ||
It's yours after all. | ||
And then it gets implemented and they're like, right, we're gonna fine these companies out of existence for refusing to censor and surveil their users. | ||
It's just everything is a Trojan horse. | ||
We just live in a world where literally everything is just a Trojan horse of the most absurd construction. | ||
And that is hilarious. | ||
We got this EU Digital Markets Act. | ||
It's for control over your data. | ||
But also now we're going to sue Apple out of existence because they have an app store. | ||
I got to be honest. | ||
I like the Apple App Store. | ||
It's one of the few downfalls of Android or PC, which I like normally because they're more customizable, but also you can download some stuff that you probably shouldn't be downloading because you can install anything on those machines. | ||
I kind of like that when you go to the App Store, it's like, okay, somebody has verified this. | ||
I at least have some semblance of trust that's like it's only on the App Store because it's been approved by Apple and you can download it and... | ||
The spyware you're downloading will be only what you intend to download. | ||
Don't get me wrong. | ||
Apps are full of spyware and will be spying on your device and can plant things in it. | ||
But at least they have to ask permission. | ||
At least it's through a system which has some level of control. | ||
I kind of don't mind that. | ||
But hey, the EU needs a reason to exist. | ||
So I guess it's justifying its existence by suing gigantic corporations. | ||
Because they're platforms for free speech. | ||
We'll move on. | ||
Maybe we can go back to that later. | ||
Meanwhile, China and Egypt conduct first joint air exercises. | ||
Egypt and China conducted their first joint military exercise called Eagles of Civilization 2025 in Egypt, reflecting closer military ties between the two nations. | ||
The drills feature Chinese J-10C fighters and other aircraft to enhance military cooperation between Egypt and China. | ||
As noted by the Chinese Ministry of National Defense, Egypt's military exercises come amid strained relations with the U.S. as Egypt seeks to diversify its defense relationships influenced by U.S. restrictions on military upgrades. | ||
Oh, yeah, okay, right. | ||
So I didn't realize. | ||
I guess we're – are we enemies with Egypt? | ||
I didn't realize this. | ||
I didn't know this, but apparently for some – | ||
God-forsaken reason. | ||
It's Israel, by the way. | ||
The reason is Israel. | ||
But for some God-forsaken reason, we are pissing off Egypt and driving them into the hands of our enemies. | ||
You know, kind of like exactly what we did with Russia. | ||
Kind of like what we're also doing with Iran. | ||
I mean, China at this point is running bombing exercises with Russian jets out of Russian military bases into Alaskan airspace. | ||
China's also cooperating with Egypt. | ||
You know, closing ranks with them. | ||
It's just if America could stop being belligerent jackasses across the globe, then all of our enemies wouldn't be getting together and training and preparing for the war to destroy us. | ||
It would be really nice if we didn't just make enemies out of people like, out of countries like Egypt and Russia and even China that we have no reason to be enemies with and in China's case actually are solely responsible for their Massive rise in prosperity over the last several decades. | ||
It's just, again, they're not stupid. | ||
The people in charge of this country, the people making these decisions are not stupid. | ||
They're evil. | ||
Let's just be very clear. | ||
They're evil. | ||
They're designing for America's destruction. | ||
You know, punishing countries that we have nothing to do with and driving them into the arms of our enemies as we continue to enrich and empower our enemies and then let 20,000 of our enemies into our country and give them gift cards and hotels to stay. | ||
And it's just, they're not stupid. | ||
They're suicidal. | ||
They're not retarded. | ||
They're evil. | ||
Let's just be perfectly clear. | ||
It's up to us. | ||
We have to stop these people. | ||
Before it's too late. | ||
Next we have this. | ||
Rubio skipping Ukraine talks as Zelensky rebuffs U.S. on Crimea. | ||
Secretary of State Marco Rubio decided on Tuesday to skip the next stage of Ukrainian ceasefire talks, while Ukraine rebuffed one of President Trump's key proposals for a deal that would halt the fighting with Russia. | ||
Negotiators from the United States, Europe, and Ukraine will still meet in London on Wednesday to continue hammering out a ceasefire proposal, but the back-to-back developments are now a double blow, raising fresh questions about how much progress is being made towards winding down the three-year war. | ||
And at a certain point, I mean at a certain point, Like, what are we doing? | ||
Just what are we doing here? | ||
And I got other stories as well, and as much as I am concerned genuinely about the rise in authoritarianism here in the States, at a certain point... | ||
Harrison Bergeron. | ||
That's just what I keep thinking. | ||
I need to just read Harrison Bergeron on the air one day, because I think about it all the time. | ||
I read it in college. | ||
I haven't read it since, but it's stuck in my mind. | ||
The dystopian short story from Kurt Vonnegut, where all humans have to be equal, so if you're more intelligent, they put a little thing in your ear that buzzes to distract you and stop your brain power. | ||
Or if you're too strong, they'll put weights on you. | ||
And the story of Harrison Bergeron, the ideal human, strongest, fastest, Most beautiful, most handsome, most intelligent. | ||
And so he has the most weights. | ||
And he just one day decides enough and just takes it all off. | ||
And it turns out once you remove the weights, pull the crap out of your ear, remove the blinders from your eyes, the mask from your face, turns out no one can stop you. | ||
Because you're stronger and better than all of them. | ||
And you can just destroy them if you so choose. | ||
And at a certain point, like America needs to Harrison Bergeron. | ||
Everybody else. | ||
Everybody that's not American, just get the hell off. | ||
Get out of the way. | ||
F you. | ||
At a certain point, at a certain point, America to Ukraine just needs to go, you have one week before we start selling weapons to Russia. | ||
We're withdrawing. | ||
You get no more intelligence. | ||
You get no more weapons. | ||
You get no more support. | ||
Good luck, you morons. | ||
Good luck, Zelensky. | ||
Good luck with all of this. | ||
Because what are they going to do? | ||
Like, why are we continuing to play this freaking game? | ||
And I got another clip of, you know, Caroline Levitt going, the Congress is holding up mass deportations. | ||
And it's like, then ignore them. | ||
What are you talking about? | ||
I mean, what is this? | ||
We have to get permission from everybody to do what is necessary? | ||
At a certain point, it's just enough is enough. | ||
It needs to just free itself from the shackles that we've allowed to be put on us and just do what's right and necessary for the sake of ourselves and the world at large. | ||
We need to go to war with the UK. | ||
Finally, we have this Minnesota state employee who allegedly caused over $20,000 in damages to Tesla is let off by woke DA as cops slam deal. | ||
A progressive district attorney has declined to charge the state employee in Tim Walton-led Minnesota, who was allegedly caught causing $20,000 in damage by vandalizing half a dozen Teslas, a decision local police chief ripped as the latest betrayal of victims. | ||
The suspected vandal, 33-year-old Minnesota government employee Daniel Bryan Adams, was allegedly spotted keying the vehicles and stripping their paint off while walking his dog around the city, despite what police believe to be evidence of... | ||
Adams committing felonies, Hennepin County District Attorney Mary Moriarty will seek diversion rather than criminal charges. | ||
$20,000 in damage. | ||
And this guy gets let off. | ||
I mean, so law just doesn't exist in America. | ||
It just doesn't exist. | ||
Illegal immigrants, El Salvadorians can get, you know, $10 million of free legal fees and the Supreme Court on his case when he's duly deported back to his home country. | ||
But God forbid Americans ever, you know, get assistance in any regard. | ||
You can walk through the Capitol high-fiving police and spend two years in solitary confinement as you await your trial. | ||
But do $20,000 of damage to people's personal property and it's not even a slap on the wrist. | ||
It's no punishment. | ||
They're just letting the guy off. | ||
There are some more extreme cases that involve murder and assaults that we could point you to, obviously. | ||
In the realm of crimes, keying cars is, I admit, not the most violent or outrageous thing. | ||
But it is a law, right? | ||
It is a law. | ||
And so they're just saying, yeah, they broke the law. | ||
Yeah, we caught him. | ||
Yeah, it did $20,000 of damage. | ||
Yes, it massively inconvenienced innocent people. | ||
It probably made their insurance rates go up. | ||
The insurance companies themselves had to spend money on it. | ||
But, you know... | ||
Yeah, it's political terrorism, but it's fine. | ||
But actually, we don't care, so we're not going to charge him. | ||
I mean, at a certain point, people are going to just stop waiting for the government to do anything. | ||
I mean, we get that that's where this goes, right? | ||
Like, we don't actually have to be victims just because the power structure decides they don't care about us. | ||
That's not how this works, actually. | ||
And so, I mean, this is the anarcho-tyranny, right? | ||
You can get caught on camera committing dozens of crimes. | ||
I mean, he didn't just key one car. | ||
He keyed a lot of cars. | ||
Six different victims. | ||
$20,000 in damage. | ||
I've seen people go to jail over... | ||
I mean, hell, it's the leftist talking point, right? | ||
He was sent to Rikers over a $20 backpack he stole or whatever. | ||
Okay, yeah, I agree, you know, punishment should fit the crime. | ||
$20,000 in damage, he doesn't even get, you know, community service. | ||
He doesn't spend a minute in jail. | ||
But of course, if you try to do anything to him, then, you know, you'll go down for assault and attempted murder and go to jail for 20 years. | ||
Because it's anarcho-tyranny. | ||
But this can't go on. | ||
This can't continue like this. | ||
This is insane. | ||
And like at a certain point, I don't know, man. | ||
I mean, it's like there are too many problems that are too extreme. | ||
Like we can't even deal with them on a piece-by-piece basis. | ||
We need full-scale flipping of the board at a certain point. | ||
I mean, it doesn't matter what topic you're talking about. | ||
Law and order, immigration. | ||
Geopolitics, indoctrination of children. | ||
It's just like it's all so utterly insane and the people in power are so hopelessly corrupt. | ||
At a certain point, we need revolution. | ||
We need total widespread revolution. | ||
Complete. Yo, let's just start. | ||
I'm just going to start with the debunking, all right? | ||
I'm going to start with the debunking. | ||
Apparently, I have expertise. | ||
Apparently, I have expertise in audiovisual technology. | ||
Everybody should know this by now. | ||
Everybody has a phone in their pocket with the camera on it. | ||
You should be aware of how optics work. | ||
It will stop you from falling for tricks a lot of the time. | ||
So, I saw this posted a couple days ago. | ||
I sort of debunked it on my Twitter, but I guess it's still been making the rounds. | ||
In this case, they got Greg Kelly. | ||
Greg Kelly made this video, clip number three. | ||
I'm going to debunk it. | ||
This is not a suspicious video. | ||
This is nothing. | ||
I want to stop you from being led down a rabbit hole of deceit. | ||
Let's go to clip number three now. | ||
unidentified
|
President Trump, after he got shot in Butler, Pennsylvania. | |
I've seen this video a thousand times, but I never noticed what I'm about to show you. | ||
So here he is. | ||
He's one more fist bump before he gets in the vehicle. | ||
unidentified
|
Now, there's this individual over here in uniform. | |
I don't know if he's Secret Service, State Police. | ||
He's got a weapon with him, a rifle. | ||
Watch what happens. | ||
On the radio there. | ||
unidentified
|
He's pointing his weapon right inside the car. | |
Now, why would he do that? | ||
unidentified
|
One more time. | |
Trump is in the car. | ||
unidentified
|
Uh, | |
That doesn't make any sense. | ||
unidentified
|
So I would like to know who that is and why he did that. | |
And I think we need the answer to that and about 15 million other questions answered about Butler, Pennsylvania. | ||
Yeah, there are still a lot of unanswered questions about Butler, Pennsylvania. | ||
That's not one of them. | ||
I'm going to explain this. | ||
It's very simple. | ||
When you zoom in, it brings the background closer to the foreground. | ||
Crew can search Hitchcock Zoom. | ||
It's the most obvious example of this. | ||
What they do is they move the camera forward while zooming out or move the camera back while zooming in. | ||
And it makes the background zoom in to the foreground and then zoom out again. | ||
And this is called optics. | ||
This is how it works. | ||
What you're seeing is not a soldier pointing a gun at Trump. | ||
You see a soldier far beyond the car pointing to the other side of the car. | ||
I think I can diagram this. | ||
If we can go to.cam, please. | ||
Go.cam, and I'll explain how this is working. | ||
I'll use this limited edition Save the Frogs Collectible fundraiser plush. | ||
We'll flip it over. | ||
I'll draw a little diagram. | ||
If you have the car here, right, the doors are open. | ||
Trump's getting in. | ||
Okay, the camera is way over here, looking this way. | ||
And it's zoomed in quite a bit. | ||
So even though people are like close to the camera here, they look like they're over here. | ||
If that soldier that we're just looking at, it appears like he's standing right here. | ||
But he's not. | ||
He's standing over here. | ||
Okay? So when he points the gun, he's pointing it on the far side of the car. | ||
He is beyond the car. | ||
I guarantee you if you find a different angle of this, you will see that officer is not pointing anywhere near President Trump. | ||
He's probably... | ||
20 feet past the car right here. | ||
It's just very zoomed in. | ||
It's very zoomed in, okay? | ||
There, this is the Hitchcock zoom. | ||
See how the background shoots away? | ||
That's probably the most famous example of it from Jaws. | ||
But it's zooming, okay? | ||
When you zoom a lens really far, it makes things look close even though they're not. | ||
Okay, so I just want, there's just a little debunking for you. | ||
That's one conspiracy you don't have to think about, okay? | ||
It doesn't exist. | ||
There's a lot of other things about... | ||
Butler, Pennsylvania, don't be distracted by the, you know, lack of knowledge of basic optics. | ||
So there you go. | ||
Theory debunked. | ||
You're welcome, everyone. | ||
And again, I guarantee you find a different angle of that. | ||
You'll see that the officer was nowhere near anything. | ||
And this happens all the time. | ||
This is like such a common thing. | ||
People see, they go, well, that looks weird. | ||
Why is that that way? | ||
It's like it's zoomed in. | ||
It's zoomed in. | ||
It's not that complicated. | ||
Really. So there you go. | ||
You're welcome, everyone. | ||
You're welcome, Greg Kelly. | ||
Send that to Greg Kelly. | ||
Tell him I let him know that there's nothing suspicious about that video. | ||
The guy's pointing far past the car. | ||
He's not pointing at Trump. | ||
That would be suspicious if it was true. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, my God. | |
Again, we just have so much. | ||
Let's just get into Peterson. | ||
Jordan Peterson went on Joe Rogan, and this is the latest in this campaign. | ||
So it probably started with Daryl Cooper, martyr maid, going on Joe Rogan and talking about... | ||
World War II in a way that didn't comport exclusively to Allied propaganda. | ||
And that was infuriating to people for whom World War II and the Holocaust represent a foundational myth of their religion. | ||
It was heresy to question that. | ||
And so they've deployed first Douglas Murray. | ||
That totally failed. | ||
He debated Dave Smith. | ||
We talked about that. | ||
He basically just became a meme by just making fun of him. | ||
For not having an argument. | ||
Well, have you even been? | ||
Have you even been to Israel? | ||
Then how dare you talk about it? | ||
As if we need to go to Ted Bundy's house to know serial killing is wrong. | ||
No, we don't. | ||
So that didn't work. | ||
It completely failed and probably backfired pretty heavily. | ||
So then they deployed the big guns. | ||
Jordan Peterson. | ||
Now, for those who don't know... | ||
Jordan Peterson has always maintained, for the last 10 years of his, you know, rise, and hey, he's had a lot of good stuff. | ||
I mean, his, you know, stuff about Pinocchio, top-of-the-line stuff, right? | ||
I mean, it's not his. | ||
He just repackages Joseph Campbell's hero with a thousand faces and the heroic cycle. | ||
Nothing Jordan Peterson puts forward is new to anybody that, you know, paid attention in high school, but, you know, it still was powerful stuff. | ||
It was good stuff. | ||
It was good that it was out there. | ||
He was a force for good, but he's maintained for the last 10 years that his purpose is to stop the radicalization of the right. | ||
He's always maintained that while he was on the right wing, his primary concern was stopping the right wing from going too far. | ||
He was always a self-appointed gatekeeper of the right. | ||
So this is nothing new. | ||
This is in line with his behavior over the last 10 years. | ||
It's just a little grating now, and it's frankly kind of hilarious how he tries to frame this discussion. | ||
So this falls into the same category of topic that we talked about yesterday, of the puff of smoke and the real intention behind what's going on. | ||
Very, very, very, very simple. | ||
People are questioning Israel, and they don't like that. | ||
And so they're deploying... | ||
Their assets to try to persuade Joe Rogan to stop having people on that criticize Israel. | ||
Whether that's, you know, Martyr Maid, Daryl Cooper, or Ian Carroll, who simply treats Israel like any other country, and when he sees their fingerprints on a conspiracy, he mentions it. | ||
That's psychopathic and evil, according to the people that just don't want you to talk about that thing. | ||
It's not complicated. | ||
It's all very simple. | ||
It's a containment operation. | ||
That's all this is. | ||
It's a method to disrupt the natural flow of discovery and conversation on the right to place artificial limits and to... | ||
Basically, they are desperately trying to patch up the Overton window as we speak. | ||
And they're doing it in the most hilarious and hypocritical... | ||
And they've been trying this for a while. | ||
James Lindsay came up with this term, woke right, which is hilariously inconsistent and just meaningless, but also weirdly applies to exactly what we're about to see from Jordan Peterson. | ||
Depends on how you define woke, but essentially they're just like, if you're right-wing but anti-Israel, you're woke right. | ||
I mean, that's all it means. | ||
They can define it however they want, but it's basically, if you question Israel and are on the right, then you are woke right, and that's how they define it. | ||
Really, that is the only depth it needs to go to at this point. | ||
So let's go to clip number, I think we'll start with 14. Here is Jordan Peterson on Rogan today, or yesterday. | ||
I don't know what you think about that. | ||
Imagine it's the distinguishing characteristic between the wannabe tyrants and the true leaders. | ||
The true leaders say, here's an offer. | ||
Would you accept this of your own free will? | ||
And the tyrants say, The apocalypse is coming, and everything, and we are allowed to do everything to forestall it. | ||
Right. Right, including control you and everything that you do. | ||
That's the problem. | ||
Yeah. Right, and that's how they get people to fall in line. | ||
They fall in line through fear. | ||
Yeah? Yeah. | ||
Well, fear and force. | ||
It's like also, you know, you have to do this because the apocalypse is looming. | ||
Which is always, in a way, true. | ||
Always. Well, there's always an apocalypse of one form or another looming. | ||
The question is, what do you do about it? | ||
Well, depending on where you live, anywhere in the world right now, right? | ||
You might be experiencing the apocalypse right now if you live in Gaza. | ||
You might be experiencing the apocalypse right now if you're in Yemen, if you're a Houthi, right? | ||
The end of the world is always coming. | ||
Right. For you, for me. | ||
Well, let's not talk about those places. | ||
Let's ignore those places. | ||
All right, let's go to... | ||
It's just hilarious. | ||
Sponsor Joe Rogan unintentionally sort of shattering all of the arguments about why you shouldn't be allowed to talk about this stuff. | ||
Psychopaths. He talks about psychopaths. | ||
Now, this is dangerous in a million different ways. | ||
I'll play a clip from Mike Cernovich that breaks it down pretty well. | ||
You know, we've been calling the left psychopaths for a long time because they fit the definition. | ||
And the colloquial, you know, vernacular psychopath, in a word, it just means you have no empathy, right? | ||
A total lack of empathy. | ||
You just don't care. | ||
Psychopaths can sit there and, like, you know, torture somebody to death and it just doesn't bother them. | ||
It's fine. | ||
It's fine to them because they don't care. | ||
They don't care what anybody thinks. | ||
They don't care how anybody else feels. | ||
That, I think, would fit as a colloquial narcissistic term. | ||
There are a lot of psychopaths out there, I think. | ||
Most of them, I think, are on the left in general. | ||
But this is pathologizing dissent. | ||
That's all this is. | ||
This is putting a psychiatric description on seeking the truth and claiming that you are dangerous and psychopathic for... | ||
Talking out of turn, which is just extremely dangerous and kind of horrifying in a way. | ||
Let's see what Peterson says about this. | ||
Clip number 13. Here's Peterson on psychopaths. | ||
I think that virtualization has enabled the psychopaths. | ||
Without a doubt. | ||
Yeah, well. | ||
Without a doubt. | ||
That's a terrible thing because the psychopathic types, they're always the death of everything. | ||
I'm seeing this come up on the right now. | ||
So imagine this. | ||
I've been working on a new... | ||
Theory of political psychopathology, and I like it quite a lot. | ||
Is this where the term the woke right comes in? | ||
Yeah, well, Lindsay is pointing at that, but he hasn't got the diagnosis exactly right. | ||
He's diagnosing your political view. | ||
That's not the issue. | ||
It's not exactly. | ||
I think what they're talking about is like similar types of behavior. | ||
He is talking about that. | ||
Yeah, I know. | ||
Woke just lets you clarify in your head, oh, it's like that. | ||
Yeah, but the problem is... | ||
It's like Antifa. | ||
Absolutely. But the problem is that That argument is predicated on the claim that the ideas are the problem, like the woke ideas. | ||
For example, on the right or the left, but that's not the problem. | ||
The problem is that 4-5% of the population, something like that, is cluster B, that's the DSM-5 terms, histrionic, narcissistic, antisocial, psychopathic, or they have... | ||
And they have dark tetrad traits. | ||
They're Machiavellian. | ||
They're sadistic. | ||
That's about 4%. | ||
Okay, so the question is, how do these people maneuver? | ||
And the answer is, they go to where the power is, and they adopt those ideas, and they put themselves even on the forefront of that. | ||
But the ideas are completely irrelevant. | ||
All they're doing is, they're the Pharisees. | ||
They're the modern version of the Pharisees. | ||
They're the people who use God's name in vain, right? | ||
Proclaim moral virtue. | ||
Yes. Doesn't matter whether it's right or left or Christian or Jewish or Islam. | ||
They invade the idea space and then they use that, those ideas as false weapons to advance their narcissistic advantage. | ||
Yes. And so then you have the problem and the right's going to face this more and more particularly because the left had to face it when they were in powers. | ||
Yes. How do you identify the psychopathic parasites? | ||
Four percent of the population who are clothed in your clothing and waving your flags, but who are only in it for narcissistic benefit. | ||
Yeah, he's kind of just describing himself there. | ||
I hate to break it to him. | ||
Let's go to... | ||
Let me just... | ||
Again, you can just ignore all of this. | ||
This doesn't mean anything. | ||
This doesn't mean anything. | ||
He's just... | ||
He's pathologizing dissent. | ||
That's all this is. | ||
He's trying to come up with the dark triad, the woke, right? | ||
Oh, they're these psychopaths who are just using these ideas. | ||
It just doesn't mean anything. | ||
It's all just gibberish. | ||
It's gobbledygook. | ||
What is he even talking about? | ||
Contend with the ideas. | ||
Isn't this your whole thing, Jordan? | ||
I mean, what they're doing is the classic leftist move of don't entertain the ideas. | ||
Don't, you know, combat the actual... | ||
Substance of the argument, but instead call your opponent crazy so you don't have to listen to them. | ||
That's all he's doing. | ||
He's dressing it up with a bunch of fancy sounding words, but that's all he's doing. | ||
This is simple. | ||
Let's go to clip number 14 here. | ||
I must have mislabeled these. | ||
I'm looking for a certain clip. | ||
Let's go to 14. I don't know what you think about that. | ||
Imagine it's the distinguishing characteristic between the wannabe tyrants. | ||
And the true leaders. | ||
The true leaders say, here's an offer. | ||
Would you accept this of your own free will? | ||
And the tyrants say, the apocalypse is coming. | ||
We can take it down because we already watched this one. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I'm missing the clip that I want. | ||
That is the one I played first. | ||
Let's go to clip 16 now. | ||
You also set that conversation up, but it poked up and made itself manifest in that conversation. | ||
And the issue is, how do you identify... | ||
The psychopathic pretenders, and it's even worse now, and then make a barrier, right? | ||
Now, the right was going for the left to do that for decades, and they didn't, and they couldn't, and the left is not good at drawing barriers, partly temperamentally. | ||
The right is somewhat better, but there's no shortage of monstrosity there. | ||
And so then the question is, how do you draw the line? | ||
And that's kind of what I was... | ||
Because I've been watching these right-wing... | ||
They're not right-wing. | ||
These psychopathic types manipulate the edge of the conservative movement for their own gain. | ||
And a lot of that's cloaked in anti-Semitic guise. | ||
There's plenty of anti-Semitism on the left, too, by the way. | ||
So it's not unique to the right. | ||
Well, particularly now. | ||
Yes, yes, yes, particularly now. | ||
And so, you know, you... | ||
This is right clip. | ||
So let's just be clear. | ||
When he says, like, oh, and it's cloaked in anti-Semitism. | ||
That's the key to what he's actually talking about. | ||
He's not talking about psychopaths. | ||
He's not talking about people that are narcissistic and dangerously taking over the ride and all this sort of stuff. | ||
He doesn't believe any of that. | ||
I don't believe any of that. | ||
This is all about anti-Semitism. | ||
That's the actual thing that's happening here, is they're trying to pathologize anti-Semitism, claiming that it makes you a psychopath for noticing things about Israel. | ||
That's all that this is, and he sort of let it slip right there. | ||
But let's go back again. | ||
So he is very deliberately telling you, he's like, I'm trying to set the Overton window. | ||
I'm trying to set, he literally said, I'm trying to set barriers. | ||
I'm trying to set barriers of conversation. | ||
Now he'll ask a question that I'll answer in just a second, but back to the video. | ||
Your curiosity and your desire for knowledge. | ||
Okay, this is another thing. | ||
Hold on, pause real quick. | ||
If you can back it up about 10 seconds. | ||
This is the other aspect of this. | ||
This is where this all becomes very sickening and makes me think that everything they're saying is entirely projection. | ||
All of these guys are framing their attack on Joe Rogan, because that's what this is, right? | ||
They're attacking Joe Rogan for daring to have on people like Daryl Cooper or Ian Carroll, despite the fact that they're extremely well-versed in what they're talking about and are extremely popular for good reason. | ||
They're mad that Joe Rogan is allowing those people on their platform. | ||
They understand they can't just come out and say, de-platform these people because they built their entire careers on opposing de-platforming. | ||
So, I mean, they can't be that obvious of hypocrites. | ||
So they have to couch, and they are couching all of their arguments in care and concern for Joe Rogan. | ||
And we're just looking out for you, buddy. | ||
We just don't want to see you go down a bad trail. | ||
Translation, you stop having these people on or you're going to have big trouble, mister. | ||
All right? | ||
This is like blackmail extortion, and so you'll see here he's buttering Joe up. | ||
They constantly are couching their criticisms and compliments of Joe. | ||
Joe, you're just so curious. | ||
You have such a curious mind, and you're so open and smart and handsome, might I add, that maybe it can lead you down. | ||
Maybe you're too curious, because curiosity is such a good aspect to have, and you have so much of it, and that's so good. | ||
Maybe it's leading you down the wrong path. | ||
So I thought this part was particularly cynical and kind of sickening the way that he is complimenting and kissing Joe's ass as he is manipulating him. | ||
So let's go back to the psychopathic narcissist talking to Joe Rogan. | ||
These right-wing, they're not right-wing, these psychopathic types. | ||
They manipulate the edge of the conservative movement for their own gain. | ||
And a lot of that's cloaked in anti-Semitic guise. | ||
There's plenty of anti-Semitism on the left, too, by the way. | ||
So it's not unique to the right. | ||
Well, particularly now. | ||
Yes, particularly now. | ||
And so, you know, you've let your curiosity guide you. | ||
Your curiosity and your desire for knowledge, this quest, you've... | ||
You've let that guide you as a podcaster. | ||
By the way, I'm trying to work through exactly the same sort of thing. | ||
You and me, Jerry, we're on the same side. | ||
Given your radical increase in stature over the last 10 years, how do you know when your curiosity and even your skepticism about the fact that things aren't the way that people say they are, because that's certainly been demonstrated in the last 10 years, | ||
how should anyone decide? | ||
What guardrails to put up? | ||
Like, what do you look for? | ||
Do you have a conceptual system worked out for that? | ||
I do. | ||
I do. | ||
No, I do. | ||
I have it. | ||
I know the answer to your question. | ||
I know Jordan Peterson, super genius. | ||
He's baffled by this. | ||
But I have an answer to where the guardrail should be, right? | ||
Where's the gate I should keep? | ||
You know, I'm trying to be a gatekeeper here. | ||
I'm just wondering where, like, where do I put that? | ||
I mean, I know it goes right ahead of Israel. | ||
Criticism, everything up until that point is good and fine, but that is, that's too far. | ||
The guardrail goes there. | ||
That's where he wants to set the guardrail. | ||
I'll tell you where I set it. | ||
On the truth. | ||
Yeah, there's the answer. | ||
There's the answer, Jordan. | ||
I figured it out for you. | ||
And he's like, what? | ||
What is the barrier? | ||
Where's the skepticism and curiosity get you? | ||
Like, when do you stop? | ||
And it's like, well, you just go as far as the truth goes. | ||
The barrier is the truth. | ||
If you go beyond the truth and you're no longer telling the truth or you're no longer focused on the truth, then you've gone too far. | ||
But if it's true, it's good and should be included in the conversation. | ||
That's not his position. | ||
See, he's trying to find a different area to guard rail. | ||
It's pretty simple to me. | ||
It's the truth. | ||
Is it true? | ||
Then great. | ||
You can say it and you can talk about it. | ||
If it's not true, then you should say it's not true. | ||
You shouldn't promote it. | ||
So there's the answer for you, Jordan. | ||
Dr. Peterson, you know, you're welcome. | ||
I know, you apparently have been struggling with this for weeks. | ||
I figured it out. | ||
You go as far as the truth will lead you. | ||
They don't want that, though. | ||
They want something else. | ||
Because some truths are, well, they make you a psychopath if you know them, I guess, is how this works. | ||
Let's go to Mike Cernovich here, clip number 11. We'll close out with this, but here's his response to Jordan Peterson, which I think is a good breakdown. | ||
unidentified
|
Accusing your political opponents of being mentally ill is a Soviet tactic right out of the playbook, but let's see how Jordan Peterson holds up under his own standards. | |
In 2016 or 2017, he decided he wanted to build a brand, so he declared that he was going to be arrested if he used the wrong pronouns. | ||
That's objectively a lie. | ||
He was never under any risk of arrest. | ||
Look it up. | ||
It's a lie. | ||
A number of people, including Stefan Molyneux, Sargon of Akkad, build him up. | ||
I did the same thing. | ||
He becomes big and then he signs for the Hollywood Agency, Creative Arts Agency. | ||
apparently it's moral to work with the same talent firm that was helping Harvey Weinstein, the casting couch. | ||
Okay, great, very, very moral guy. | ||
He had suggested that Justice Kavanaugh should resign from the Supreme Court because that would be a moral victory and it would show the left that you won somehow when you're falsely accused of heinous crimes, you should | ||
He became addicted to pills, but no, he didn't become addicted to pills. | ||
He was iatrogenic. | ||
It was caused by his doctors because Jordan didn't know that benzos were habit-forming and addicting, although every psychologist knows that. | ||
I know that. | ||
So that's strange. | ||
He couldn't be a regular addict, even though addiction can't get any of us. | ||
No, no, he's special. | ||
His was something else. | ||
And that's that. | ||
Custom suits, wears makeup, obsessed with his image. | ||
I mean, you want to talk about a vain peacock? | ||
That would be Jordan Peterson. | ||
But he's not a narcissist. | ||
Everybody else is mentally ill. | ||
Not him, of course. | ||
He weeps. | ||
He cries. | ||
He can't control his emotions at all. | ||
He took the COVID vaccine and encouraged others to do so. | ||
He told the truckers to go home. | ||
And lately, he has partnered with the ADL Front Group to try to censor people who are claiming that Christ is king. | ||
And of course, the same front group he works with, we looked into it and found it, had tried to censor COVID-19 vaccine critics. | ||
So who is mentally ill? | ||
Is it Puffy, Jordan Peterson, with his custom suits and lining his pockets? | ||
Or is it everyone else? | ||
Everybody but Jordan's mentally ill, right? | ||
I guess. | ||
Yeah. Yeah, it's a great breakdown by Cernovich. | ||
And of course, he starts off by saying this is a Soviet tactic to pathologize dissent or however he puts it. | ||
And I'll show you a clip on the other side. | ||
I'll do it in the first five minutes, then we'll move on from this. | ||
But it highlights really everything Mike Cernovich was just saying. | ||
The pure, unadulterated, unfiltered, raw projection coming out of Jordan Peterson. | ||
He is everything he says not to be. | ||
And that's very ironic, but also completely in line with people associated with things like the Daily Wire, who despise identity politics for most people. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. | |
you | ||
All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
I just want to go to one final clip of Jordan Peterson, not him on Joe Rogan, but he went on Hannity to push the same idea, linking Christ is king to being hateful and anti-Semitic. | ||
But I want you to pretend, and this is the really The illuminating part of all this, I think. | ||
If you just pretend that Jordan Peterson is talking about Jews in this clip, he sounds exactly like every neo-Nazi. | ||
And it's pretty amazing. | ||
This is what I mean by the pure projection from Jordan Peterson. | ||
He's talking about people on the right who aren't in favor of Israel in exactly the same way Nazis talk about Jews. | ||
And this is just fascinating to me. | ||
So let's go now to clip number 15. Just imagine, just think for yourself, like... | ||
Jordan Peterson is talking about the Jewish people while he's saying all of this. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Well, I think the most important thing to do first is to draw a distinction between the political and the psychological and not to collapse them together. | ||
So imagine this. | ||
Imagine that there's a group of individuals, about 4% of the population, who have a... | ||
Who have a set of personality characteristics that have been described as dark tetrad. | ||
So they're Machiavellian. | ||
They use their language to manipulate. | ||
They're narcissistic. | ||
They want unearned social status and reputation. | ||
They're psychopathic, which makes them free of empathy and parasitical and predatory. | ||
And they're sadistic. | ||
So they take positive delight in the unnecessary suffering of others. | ||
Now, those people also use false cries of victimization, let's say, to manipulate, and they're entitled. | ||
They seek vengeance when it's unwarranted, and they protest loudly and make very public cries for reparations that would be self-serving. | ||
Okay, now, the way those people operate is they look for what patterns of belief form groups that they can infiltrate and then capitalize on. | ||
And that happens on the right. | ||
We did a report, the same group, on the use of Christ as king as a manipulative strategy by bad actors, hypothetically, on the right. | ||
And this report identified the same sort of people on the left. | ||
But it's not primarily political. | ||
They're wolves in sheep's clothing who look for where there's power and value and then adopt those beliefs as a surface camouflage so that they can elevate their moral status. | ||
And this has become worse in recent years, as far as I'm concerned, because the evolved strategies that we have for dealing with these psychopathic types, psychopathic narcissistic types, don't work well online. | ||
And so the psychopaths can get away with their terrible manipulations online, and they can find like-minded people, and they can escape from any reputational consequences. | ||
There's always been psychopaths. | ||
Those are the Pharisees, for example, that Christ points to, the religious pretenders. | ||
Those are the people who use God's name in vain and claim moral virtue and even religious devotion. | ||
Well, all they're doing is feathering their own nests and furthering their own narrow interests. | ||
And the web, social media, anonymity enables them to organize and also hides them much more effectively. | ||
And this is a problem in religious organizations, it's a problem in political organizations, and it pathologizes the whole culture. | ||
You know, most people, 80% of Americans agree on virtually everything. | ||
And then there's these fringe people, and they're not political. | ||
They're psychopathological narcissists who cloak themselves in political guise. | ||
And we all have to learn to distinguish between the political and the psychological. | ||
We're not good at it. | ||
Calm down, Adolph. | ||
Jeezum, Pete. | ||
I mean, that was brutal. | ||
That's absolutely brutal. | ||
I mean, it's like word for word. | ||
It's like you take Jordan Peterson's words, you put it to a neo-Nazi speech. | ||
I mean, you don't have to change much, folks. | ||
You don't have to change much. | ||
It's pretty incredible. | ||
I also just love that he starts and ends that diatribe by saying, We can't conflate psychology and politics, but let me tell you about how I'm conflating pathology and politics. | ||
Let me describe to you how I'm going to give a medical psychiatric diagnosis to political actors because of their stances. | ||
It's like, okay, dude, I mean, is this working? | ||
Do you think this is working? | ||
Does anyone think this is working? | ||
It's not working. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
The second hour of American Journal is on. | ||
We'll be joining the 10 o'clock hour by Invisible Inquiry, Drew Arnold, to lay out, not just in vague and casual way, the depopulation agenda, but actually showing you the mechanisms behind how it's being carried out and the organizations that are doing it. | ||
So very excited to be joined by him. | ||
I know he made a big splash on that with Maria Z a few days ago, so very excited to talk to him. | ||
We have just so much political news to talk about really across the board here. | ||
I'll just say, as a final note to everything we're talking about with Jordan Peterson, which isn't a singular event, but is rather just part of a campaign or a... | ||
Agenda being put forward. | ||
And some people have pointed to things like Douglas Murray going and criticizing Martyr Maid, Daryl Cooper, and then Daryl Cooper came out with an essay sort of like apologizing for his World War II view and being like, I'm not going to talk about this anymore. | ||
And people have pointed at that and said, this is like the one-two punch. | ||
This is the Hegelian dialectic kind of in operation. | ||
Which, you know, that... | ||
There may be something to that, but the big problem to me is they're just not contending with the actual arguments. | ||
It's all smears. | ||
It's all pathologizing dissent. | ||
It's all criticizing somebody's authority or where they've gone to school or whether they've been to the place. | ||
And it's like, what about the ideas? | ||
Are the ideas right or are they wrong? | ||
Our ideas are right, and you can't contend with them, so you have to come up with all these other reasons why it's bad that we talk about this stuff. | ||
But I just want to point out that one of the major pro-Israel voices on the right, this guy called Misfit Patriot, and yesterday he posted this, quote, I'm okay with as many dead kids as it takes to stop Hamas. | ||
Let me stop you right there, Misfit. | ||
Let me stop you right after I'm okay with as many dead kids as it takes. | ||
You want to talk about psychopaths. | ||
You want to talk about psychopathy. | ||
People I'm looking at is Misfit Patriot and people like Randy Fine. | ||
I mean, literally, you know, Jordan Peterson's like, it's defined by a wanton celebration of pain being caused. | ||
It's like, yeah, okay, so like when somebody posts a picture of a... | ||
Dead Palestinian baby and Randy Fine says, thanks, I love it. | ||
Would that be the type of celebration you're talking about? | ||
So again, it's just all pure projection. | ||
Yeah, Misfit Patriot goes off on these liberal, these libtards don't want to kill kids. | ||
What are you, a libtard? | ||
You don't want to kill kids? | ||
You don't want to kill all the kids? | ||
What are you, a Hamas supporter? | ||
What are you, a liberal? | ||
You leftist? | ||
You don't want to kill the kids? | ||
I'm not even kidding. | ||
I mean, I can't even say this stuff. | ||
But he literally says, you pussies won't... | ||
You don't want to kill kids, pussy? | ||
Like, come on. | ||
People are sick. | ||
People are messed up in the brain and everybody notices now. | ||
And everybody is seeing it, so keep it up. | ||
Dummies. Just crazy. | ||
Just absolutely mind-boggling. | ||
I'm okay with killing as many kids as possible. | ||
All of them, I think, should be killed. | ||
I'm the good side, and you're evil for disagreeing with me. | ||
Where are the guardrails? | ||
Okay. All right, moving on. | ||
We'll move on now. | ||
Let's go to clip number seven. | ||
Let's go to clip number seven. | ||
Well, maybe we'll move up to that because that's a clip talking about Trump. | ||
Taking some extraordinary measures. | ||
Doing things like suspending habeas corpus to get things done. | ||
But at this point, we gotta do something. | ||
Something's not working here. | ||
And Trump's the one in position to do something. | ||
And he's gotta do something. | ||
So, I'm open to it. | ||
So let's lay the groundwork first. | ||
And we'll show you the barriers to Trump implementing what we all voted him to do. | ||
And then maybe we'll talk about some of the solutions to these obstacles. | ||
Let's go first to clip number one here. | ||
I'm sorry, not clip number one. | ||
Let's go to clip number nine, Caroline Levitt. | ||
Here she is. | ||
unidentified
|
Caroline, I have two questions. | |
One on immigration and one on China. | ||
First on immigration. | ||
Roughly, how many illegal immigrants and aliens do we have in our country? | ||
And how many does the administration plan on deporting? | ||
Sure. Well, you'd have to ask the Department of Homeland Security for a specific number, but we suspect it's definitely in the millions, perhaps upwards of 20 million people that were allowed into the country illegally by the previous administration. | ||
And the president and his team are focused on deporting as many as we possibly can. | ||
And they are moving as... | ||
As quickly as possible, the president's team has made it clear we need more funding from Congress to do more. | ||
We need more ICE agents out on the ground doing this very important work. | ||
And we also need rogue district court judges to stop acting as judicial activists, trying to block the administration from deporting illegal criminals from our nation's interior. | ||
The American public elected the president to do this, and he's following through with that promise. | ||
unidentified
|
We have over a quarter million Chinese nationals in our country right now on student visas. | |
Does the administration believe there's any national? | ||
Quarter million. | ||
Well, as you know, when it comes to foreign visas, the Secretary of State has the right to revoke visas of those who we feel are acting in an adversarial way to our foreign policy interests here in the United States. | ||
He has that authority according to the Immigration and Nationality Act. | ||
So I would defer you to the State Department for any individual case, but they are looking at individuals who are given the privilege of being on a visa in our country. | ||
Acting, again, adversial to our foreign policy interests. | ||
Their visa can be revoked, and they should be aware of that. | ||
But they're not being, because the Chinese people in this country aren't the ones writing op-eds that are anti-Israel. | ||
Again, you know, I'm sorry to bring it up all the time. | ||
It's just, it's not my fault. | ||
It is the thing that's happening. | ||
I wouldn't say it if it wasn't true, okay? | ||
You have my promise on that. | ||
I wouldn't say it if it wasn't happening. | ||
So, blame reality. | ||
For why I have to talk about this constantly. | ||
I'm sorry, but I hear excuses. | ||
We need the Congress to give us more money. | ||
I mean, yeah, the Congress should be doing that. | ||
Yes, Congress is completely failing to give Trump the backup that he needs right now. | ||
It's infuriating, but not exactly unpredictable. | ||
So, I mean, I guess, but, like, really, do you? | ||
Do you really need more money? | ||
I mean, didn't they set aside... | ||
Billions of dollars for the illegal immigrants. | ||
So, I mean, right now you have blank checks to pay for the hotels that they're all staying in, to pay for the transportation and the food and the gift cards and everything else that they get when they arrive here. | ||
Can that money not be used? | ||
Can we not use that money, maybe? | ||
I mean, it's billions of dollars. | ||
We can't use that. | ||
Somehow, infinite money for importing these people, no money for getting them out. | ||
We're hamstrung in that regard. | ||
Great. District judges, no compunction about them being flown in, but now their temporary protected status has expired. | ||
They're stepping in to say that they can't do that. | ||
I mean, I don't want excuses. | ||
I want results. | ||
And, like, we really are in this dire situation where, like, just get it done. | ||
Just get it done. | ||
Deal with the fallout afterwards. | ||
But just get it done. | ||
Just stop making excuses. | ||
Stop asking for other people to help. | ||
They're not going to help. | ||
We helped you. | ||
The American people got you into office. | ||
The American people have put up with 10 years of bullcrap on the promise. | ||
If we just elect the right person who just puts this into action, things will get better. | ||
We're out of patience. | ||
We don't need to ask our enemies for permission to do what's necessary. | ||
We cannot be hamstrung by district courts. | ||
Deciding in favor of the ACLU to stop the deportation of some MS-13 radical. | ||
I mean, it's like, again, the only thing we have to fear is timidity. | ||
Forget the only thing we have to fear is fear itself. | ||
The only thing we have to fear is not going far enough. | ||
That's it. | ||
That's the only issue. | ||
I mean, seriously, what is the risk that we might deport too many people? | ||
As long as you're not deporting American citizens, it's fine. | ||
It's fine. | ||
Now, there's also just, like, I just don't get it, man. | ||
I really, it's just like, it's so simple. | ||
Everything that we need to do is just, just imminently doable. | ||
There's no reason why any of this should be difficult at all, even a little bit, okay? | ||
I'm just, and just recognize, I mean, the rule of law doesn't exist. | ||
It doesn't exist. | ||
Just pure power. | ||
Just pure power and personal politics. | ||
That's all that exists now. | ||
I mean, if you can do $20,000 to six different people's personal property, keep their cars, be caught on camera, and you don't even get a slap on the wrist, there's not even a fine. | ||
Let's just accept that. | ||
There's no rule of law anymore, okay? | ||
This doesn't exist. | ||
There's no law that said they were allowed to bring in 20 million immigrants. | ||
That's totally illegal. | ||
Nobody voted for that. | ||
Nobody allowed that. | ||
If the Congress writes the laws and the executive is supposed to enforce them, where is the law that Congress wrote that said they're allowed to open up the gates and bring in 20 million people and make an app for them to make it easier and fly them in if they can't make it themselves and fund all of the UN programs getting them here in the first place? | ||
I mean, none of that's legal. | ||
None of that should have been allowed. | ||
They just did it. | ||
So, like, those are the rules. | ||
Just operate within those rules. | ||
Deport these people immediately. | ||
Deport all of them. | ||
Don't ask. | ||
Don't ask for permission. | ||
Don't even tell anybody you're doing it. | ||
unidentified
|
Just do it. | |
Just do it. | ||
I mean, when they're flying a plane full of kids in the middle of the night so that they aren't being caught doing this, we have to get a whistleblower to have, like, undercover footage. | ||
Of darkened planes full of unclaimed children being flown in the middle of the night from Brownsville to Pittsburgh and then given to people without ID. | ||
I mean, that's what they were doing. | ||
So let's just do that in reverse. | ||
How about in the middle of the night, you pack planes full of illegal immigrants, you take them to Venezuela, you open up the cargo door, and you push them out, and then you fly back home and you do it again. | ||
And you do that about 20,000 times, and maybe we'll make a dent on this. | ||
But what are we doing? | ||
Because now, there's stories where it's like, German hikers who went to Hawaii were detained and missed their vacation because they were suspicious about their immigration. | ||
It's like, backpackers from Germany are not the issue. | ||
How is this a thing? | ||
How is this a thing? | ||
It's like you hire an exterminator to deal with ants in your yard, and they accidentally shoot your dog. | ||
It's like, this should not be an issue. | ||
You have hotels full of illegal immigrants, That you just need to send SWAT teams into, drag them out, and send them away. | ||
Why are backpackers from Germany being wrapped up in this? | ||
Why is it like there's some Harvard, it's like some story today that was like, Harvard has a way to cure cancer, but they just stopped the person who is the scientist who's behind all of it. | ||
It's like, is this really that hard? | ||
Is this really that difficult? | ||
So we somehow were not able to deal with the illegal immigrants. | ||
But we are inconveniencing backpackers from Germany and arresting medical students in Tulane. | ||
Like, this is retarded. | ||
How is it this difficult? | ||
No more excuses. | ||
The most frustrating part about all of this is seeing the government act in perfect rapidity and power whenever they want to. | ||
They can do it. | ||
That's the most frustrating part. | ||
They want to act like this is some systemic issue. | ||
It's like, well, if the Congress would just, oh, well, these judges are just, and I mean, the money, where's the money? | ||
And it's like, okay, do you remember when you declared martial law over the flu? | ||
Remember that? | ||
Remember when you did that? | ||
Remember when you shut down every school in the country because Deborah Burke said to? | ||
Remember that? | ||
Remember six-foot distancing had no valid scientific backing whatsoever? | ||
Remember when you imposed that on the entire country? | ||
No barriers to doing that somehow. | ||
Isn't that kind of weird? | ||
And when you wanted TikTok banned, it got banned. | ||
When you wanted the Harvard president replaced, they got replaced right away. | ||
When you wanted to open the border, no barriers there. | ||
It was open and all the money was provided. | ||
So stop with the excuses. | ||
Stop with the lies. | ||
Stop with the blaming other people. | ||
We know what the US government is capable of because every time they have an opportunity to weaponize some system of government against the American people, suddenly there's no barriers to them doing that. | ||
Suddenly they can do that like breathing. | ||
I mean, it's the simplest thing in the world for them to just impose insane restrictions, destroy institutions, take over corporations. | ||
They just can do whatever the hell they want. | ||
When exclusively it comes to oppressing the American people, no holds barred. | ||
No barriers whatsoever. | ||
Suddenly, to do what's necessary and right for the people of this country, all the boxes have to be checked, all the I's have to be dotted, all the T's have to be crossed. | ||
I mean, we have to do this the right way, and they're not letting us, so I guess we can't do it anymore. | ||
I mean, this is ridiculous. | ||
This is ridiculous. | ||
Trump has the power. | ||
He can just do it. | ||
And nobody's stopping him. | ||
Nobody can stop him. | ||
Except for himself. | ||
We have nothing to fear but timidity. | ||
We have nothing to fear but excuses. | ||
It's infuriating. | ||
That's why people are getting frustrated and sounding off about this. | ||
Let's go to clip number seven now. | ||
This is Steve Bannon and I believe D.C. Drano talking about what Trump has to do. | ||
What do you do when your own intelligence apparatus around the president is trying to undercut him so he has no standing in the court when he does exactly what you say he has to do, which is suspend habeas corpus and start rolling him out of here, brother? | ||
Well, is that the same deep state that indicted them four times? | ||
We don't care what they say, okay? | ||
We have common sense. | ||
We watched our country be invaded for four years by 10 to 15 million illegal aliens, many of them men of fighting age, okay? | ||
And when I say suspend the writ, not only is this a constitutional power in Article I, Section 9, but we're not even suspending it for American citizens, okay? | ||
There's none of that. | ||
These are illegal aliens. | ||
They do not have a right to be here. | ||
They get deported. | ||
We go around the courts by using constitutional authority to do so. | ||
And the president who used this the most is the Democrats' favorite president of all time, FDR, okay? | ||
FDR used it. | ||
Abraham Lincoln used it, and Ulysses S. Grant used it. | ||
And you know what? | ||
All their faces are on our money, okay? | ||
They ended up being pretty good-looking in historical hindsight. | ||
And Trump has the chance to do that. | ||
We have to normalize this. | ||
You cannot allow 20 million illegal aliens to invade our country and allow them to stay. | ||
This is an invasion. | ||
That is what an invasion is. | ||
Time to start taking drastic action. | ||
I understand what President Trump is doing. | ||
He's going through the process. | ||
He's exposing. | ||
That Democrat Marxist judges are going to stop him every step of the way. | ||
At a certain point, I feel he's going to have no decision but to do this. | ||
And you know what? | ||
If he stands strong and he does it, he'll win in a landslide in the midterms because this is what Americans want on both sides of the aisle. | ||
Yeah, 100%. | ||
I completely agree. | ||
Again, I wish we didn't get to this point, but it's really not our fault. | ||
And it really is just it's necessary for survival. | ||
Who was it? | ||
Somebody was saying, I thought maybe I had a video. | ||
But if somebody, Tucker Carlson was talking to, basically saying, you know, Trump's the only one who is willing to say to America, you have cancer and we have to do chemotherapy. | ||
And that's just, that's what has to happen. | ||
It's the only, it's the only way. | ||
It must be done. | ||
This is the story I was talking about. | ||
Ryan Grimm, we're in the grip of genuine evil, objectively speaking, he says. | ||
You must be a leftist. | ||
New images could change cancer diagnosis, diagnostics, but ICE detained the Harvard scientist who analyzes them. | ||
Without scientists, Senea Petrova's expertise, no one can fully unlock the data's potential, putting crucial advancements in early cancer detection at risk. | ||
unidentified
|
you Thank you. | |
Why is this happening? | ||
Why are they going after people like this? | ||
I mean, fine, whatever, their immigrants go after them. | ||
Who cares? | ||
We're talking like we are in a triage situation. | ||
We are bleeding out. | ||
You need to staunch the bleeding first. | ||
Get rid of the illegal immigrants. | ||
You know, the millions of them, the hordes, you remember them. | ||
They came across the southern border. | ||
They're living in hotels in New York City right now. | ||
They're not going to Harvard, right? | ||
They're not attending school with appropriate visas that students apply for and receive. | ||
Like, okay, yes, we should... | ||
Get rid of student visas. | ||
No, we should not have a quarter million Chinese stealing our technology, taking spots in our schools, and leaving us without any engineers when they head back to China with all of our military secrets. | ||
Like, yeah, that's retarded. | ||
Yes, that is unbelievably stupid we do that, and we should vastly limit the number of student visas we give out. | ||
I'm in favor of that. | ||
But we're bleeding out. | ||
So staunch the bleeding. | ||
Deal with the wound to the heart first. | ||
Then you can go after all that other stuff. | ||
The thing that's killing us are the, not 20 million, it's probably 50 million. | ||
I mean, we're talking 350 million people in the country. | ||
Probably 50 million of them are not American and not supposed to be here and not on a visa and not here with permission. | ||
So get rid of them. | ||
Stop making excuses. | ||
Stop going after medical students and German backpackers and just get rid of the invaders. | ||
Really not that hard. | ||
And it goes right into this next story. | ||
Clip number one. | ||
Attorney General Pam Bondi at the launch of a task force to eradicate anti-Christian bias. | ||
Yet we don't need this either, lady. | ||
Arrest the Epstein clients. | ||
Arrest the people who opened the border to our country. | ||
Charge the kleptocrats that have been robbing us blind for the last several decades with crimes and put them in prison. | ||
Anti-Christian bias. | ||
Like, okay, fine. | ||
You want to start a task force for anti-Christian bias. | ||
Your first task will be to go after the task force for anti-Semitic bias. | ||
Go after the laws against anti-Semitism that would make it illegal to spread the gospel and to read out of the book of the Gospel of John. | ||
Like, what are you talking about? | ||
You want to get rid of anti-Christian bias. | ||
It's you. | ||
The call is coming from inside the house. | ||
Look at what your administration has been up to. | ||
The last couple of weeks. | ||
Let's go to Pam Bondi. | ||
We'll probably cut her off, but here's Pam Bondi not doing what we elected her to do, and instead, and by the way, I know, call me a crazy conspiracy theorist, call me an anti-Semitic. | ||
I can't help but think that this is literally just cover for the anti-Semitic task force. | ||
I can't help but think they're looking around going, gee, it sure does look like we are prioritizing one religion over the others. | ||
Gee, it looks an awful lot like we're creating some sort of Theocracy inside the American government where we uphold the beliefs of one religion over all of the others. | ||
Maybe we should cover this up by having an anti-Christian bias task force that doesn't actually do anything but gives cover so we can go, no, it's not about anti-symptom. | ||
We're just trying to stop hate or whatever. | ||
I mean, honestly, I think it's all in service of that because this makes no sense. | ||
This is stupid. | ||
This shouldn't happen. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Thank you all for joining us today. | ||
We're excited to be here for the launch of the task force to eradicate anti-Christian bias as outlined in the president's executive order. | ||
Joining me today are members of the task force and individuals who have been impacted by the anti-Christian bias. | ||
Together, this task force will identify any unlawful anti-Christian policies, Well, | ||
great. We can take it down. | ||
I'll say exactly the same thing that I said about the anti-Semitic task force. | ||
We don't need this. | ||
If it's already illegal, then it's illegal. | ||
Punish it as being illegal. | ||
It's not that complicated. | ||
I know. | ||
People might be surprised by this. | ||
Well, he was against the anti-Semitism task force, but he's not in favor of the anti-Christian task force? | ||
Yeah, I actually have principles. | ||
I actually don't want the government dictating religion to me. | ||
Now, the irony is, and the good thing about this is, that now you've got people going, well, hold on, the government's going to tell me what I can believe religiously and how I need to treat people? | ||
And it's like, oh, now we know this, do we? | ||
Oh, now it's an issue, is it because it's Christians? | ||
Thank you for joining us, finally. | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll be back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
We'll be right back. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
You can support us by going to thealexjonesstore.com, thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
Your one-stop shop for patriotic merchandise. | ||
Great place for gifts or, you know, gear for yourself. | ||
And this summer, we got some great summertime t-shirts like the Gulf of America shirt, which is an extremely popular one because it's subtle enough to fly under the radar, but, you know, funny enough to... | ||
Get a wink and a nod from your fellow Trump supporters out there. | ||
But of course, the supplements are incredible. | ||
You should be fired up on Shilajit gummies as we speak. | ||
I know I am. | ||
The IRC moss, of course, incredibly powerful. | ||
And so much more, the ultramethyl and blue. | ||
I mean, it just goes on and on. | ||
Incredible stuff. | ||
It's all the best of the best. | ||
Go research yourself. | ||
See what it can do for you. | ||
See if it's right for you. | ||
And shop at thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
And of course, the... | ||
I like plugging the merchandise, the shirts and hats and this awesome little frog toy and the belt buckle, things like that, just because I know that's the type of stuff that I used to buy when I was a Button Infowars viewer before I joined. | ||
There's a lot of great stuff, and I like it because, you know, the more people wear that stuff out, the more friends you can make. | ||
And it really happens like almost every day to me. | ||
I saw a guy... | ||
Yesterday with the big Infowars secede sticker on his water bottle. | ||
And now we're friends, and that's how it works. | ||
So share the knowledge. | ||
Share the info. | ||
Wear it loud and proud. | ||
TheAlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison if you want to let him know who sent you. | ||
So I might just go through some of these headlines. | ||
We have so many headlines to get to. | ||
This one's pretty funny, actually. | ||
Or at least the way it's phrased is funny. | ||
There was a story, yeah, Ground News had a funny headline for this. | ||
Supreme Court seems to back letting parents opt out of LGBTQ stories. | ||
The Supreme Court is considering allowing parents to prevent the indoctrination of their children into deviant sexual lifestyles. | ||
The Supreme Court is considering whether you as a parent have a right to avoid cultish indoctrination of your children by perverted adults. | ||
Trying to seduce them into bizarre sexual fetishes. | ||
You might. | ||
You might have that right. | ||
They're thinking about it. | ||
You might not. | ||
But they're leaning towards that side. | ||
That you just might be allowed to not let your kid be indoctrinated by a man in a dress. | ||
Oh, great. | ||
Who says the Supreme Court is a worthless husk? | ||
The Supreme Court's conservative majority indicated support for allowing parents to opt their children out of LGBTQ books in elementary school, reflecting a push to expand religious rights. | ||
As if this is a religious right. | ||
I mean, again, think about this in a very simple way. | ||
The LGBT movement is a religion. | ||
Just be clear. | ||
It has all of the functions of a religion. | ||
Doesn't have a church or priests. | ||
They don't believe in God. | ||
But it's a moral framework. | ||
It is a spiritual understanding of the world around you that is different, separate, and distinct from the Christian worldview or the Jewish worldview or the Islamic worldview. | ||
It is the rainbow worldview. | ||
It is the worldview of this satanic religion. | ||
So when you put it in that frame, all of this becomes pretty absurd. | ||
They're saying, well, it's a question of religious freedom. | ||
I mean, what's happening is that a religion is being pumped out by our government, being embedded in the curriculum of our elementary schools to indoctrinate kids away from their family's religion and into this religion. | ||
And they're saying you might not have an ability to opt out of that. | ||
Again, they have laws on the books in states all over the country banning conversion therapy. | ||
Now, conversion therapy is when you tell kids you don't have to be gay. | ||
Actually, you don't have to act on your impulses. | ||
You don't have to succumb to your animal drives. | ||
And it's a sin. | ||
And it's better for you and society and your soul and everybody if you do what's normal and make a family and have kids. | ||
It's actually the best outcome possible. | ||
In any regard. | ||
You're not allowed to say, no, that's conversion therapy. | ||
Now, if you take a kid and keep him in a closet during recess, we can dress up like a woman and you keep that secret from his parents and you celebrate and encourage him or her to be a him or her. | ||
That's not conversion therapy. | ||
That's just embracing LGBT. | ||
Like, if you just think about it as a religion, all of this becomes absurd and you can just apply. | ||
Like, that's what they should do. | ||
If we want to figure out how to solve this problem once and for all, just go, we are denoting the LGBT agenda, the idea that that whole thing is a religion. | ||
It's now going to fall under the same protections and limitations of any other religion. | ||
So just like we don't have books in elementary schools that teach religious doctrine for Christians, Jews, or Muslims, we shouldn't do it for the LGBT either because it is a religious framework. | ||
That is contrary to a lot of the students that are there and their families and their traditions. | ||
So it shouldn't be included. | ||
It's all very simple. | ||
None of this is complicated. | ||
None of anything I'm talking about is complicated, even a little bit. | ||
It's all evil. | ||
It's all deception. | ||
It's all manipulation. | ||
It's all subversion. | ||
It's not complicated, though. | ||
The court's liberal justices argue that exposing students to different ideas does not burden religion. | ||
Which is not an argument. | ||
So again, it's just, I don't know, | ||
it's hilarious to me. | ||
It's like the Supreme Court is considering allowing parents to stop their children from being inducted into a satanic religion. | ||
Again, it's one of these things that's like, I genuinely don't understand how it got this far. | ||
And all I can hope is that this is a simple function of the designed and deliberately manufactured herd mentality of Americans, and that if we can stop the propaganda and actually push out reality-based messaging... | ||
That the same sort of inclination to go with the herd happens in the opposite direction and people just like suddenly realize how absurd all of this is because as it is now, I have friends with kids in classrooms in Austin, | ||
Texas, seven years old, half of the class is non-gender conforming. | ||
50% of the first grade classroom is transgender or gay. | ||
They're in first grade. | ||
They don't even know what that means yet. | ||
That does not happen without deliberate, concerted, top-down propaganda targeted at kindergartners. | ||
That's how you end up with a first-grade class full of queers. | ||
Okay? This doesn't make any sense. | ||
This doesn't make any sense. | ||
So wake up. | ||
Everybody needs to wake the hell up. | ||
I mean... | ||
Can somebody help me understand? | ||
What is the mindset of the average parent? | ||
Because everybody I talk to, when they hear that, their response is uniform. | ||
It's, oh my god. | ||
That's the only response I, because I had a dinner party last weekend. | ||
Yeah, you know, 50% of the kids in this class are non-gender conforming. | ||
And the other people at the table were just like, what? | ||
Oh my god. | ||
50%? | ||
It's like, maybe more. | ||
It's like, what the hell is that? | ||
What is going on? | ||
But these are people that are, you know, good, decent, thoughtful people. | ||
What goes on in the minds of people whose kid comes home and is like, I'm actually a little boy. | ||
You're going to call me he now. | ||
And the parents go, okay, cute. | ||
Yeah, half my class is gay in first grade. | ||
My favorite animal is the unicorn, and I'm transsexual. | ||
It's like, what are you talking about? | ||
What parent just goes, wow, 50% of them are gay, huh? | ||
What a beautiful thing that we're so accepting now. | ||
Like, what is wrong with people? | ||
Wake up. | ||
This isn't normal. | ||
This isn't good. | ||
People don't care about your children. | ||
They aren't doing what's best for your children. | ||
They are indoctrinating them into a genetic dead-end cult. | ||
Again, enough, enough of discussing this. | ||
Enough of, oh, why is this even at the Supreme Court? | ||
How did this get to the Supreme Court? | ||
The Supreme Court is going to tell you whether or not you can stop some perverted weirdo cult member from molesting your kid mentally, I guess. | ||
But no, there's massive amounts of sexual grooming that goes on. | ||
In the homosexual community, that's a fact. | ||
Sorry, did I... | ||
Where are the barriers? | ||
Sorry, did someone get Jordan Peterson on the line? | ||
Are there barriers here? | ||
Does this make me a psychopath to recognize the statistically outsized representation of homosexuals in the pedophilia realm? | ||
It's true, so take it up with God. | ||
Moving on. | ||
State Department to eliminate 132 offices in major restructuring. | ||
The Trump administration is reportedly undertaking a widespread reorganization of the State Department, which will see 132 agency offices closed. | ||
Per a report from the Free Press, internal documents obtained by the outlet reveal the plans to reorganize, which include the elimination or restructuring of hundreds of D.C. offices. | ||
In addition, the State Department will reportedly reduce its number of offices by 17%. | ||
From 734 to 602, a senior State Department official told the outlet that the undersecretaries in the department have also been instructed to come up with plans to reduce their U.S. personnel in individual departments by 15% within 30 days. | ||
And as we've pointed out time and time again over the course of decades, the State Department is the powerhouse of the deep state. | ||
The State Department, and the seventh floor in particular, is where it goes down. | ||
All right? | ||
This was MTV Cribs. | ||
This would be where the magic happens. | ||
The Secretary of State operates in certain instances as a shadow president, the head of the deep state, shadow American government. | ||
So, you know, when it's Hillary Clinton gunrunning Stinger missiles to Syrian rebels and getting ambassadors killed in Libya, that's the State Department. | ||
Okay? When they're in Ukraine overthrowing the duly elected president and installing a puppet and kicking off the events that have culminated in the Ukraine-Russia war, where was Victoria Nuland? | ||
The State Department. | ||
The State Department is the deep state. | ||
And the seventh floor in particular. | ||
So it needs to be reformed. | ||
Good thing it is. | ||
I guess maybe they figured out it can't be reformed, so now they're just eliminating it. | ||
Fine. But if you want to identify the one government office most responsible, For geopolitical disasters, it's the State Department. | ||
I want to do a skit. | ||
It'd have to be Victoria Nuland. | ||
But it'd be like she's sitting down for a review. | ||
Of course, she's not in the State Department anymore. | ||
She went to the National Endowment for Democracy, NED, which is a State Department functionary NGO. | ||
But that's beside the point. | ||
But like you imagine going to a quarterly review and they sit down with you and they go, let's review your latest proposal. | ||
When enacted, resulted in costing the country $4 trillion. | ||
It killed a million people. | ||
You left 10 million people orphaned. | ||
You destroyed a functional government and replaced it with a terrorist regime that is currently carrying out pogroms against minorities in the country. | ||
This has crashed the economy for large swaths of the world and may well end up in World War III. | ||
Victoria Nuland's across the desk like, gee, really is all that happened, huh? | ||
And they go, so what do you have for us next? | ||
So what's your next idea? | ||
We can't wait to get it done. | ||
It's crazy. | ||
It's crazy how many times these people, these exact same people, over and over again, start the Iraq War, and the Afghanistan War, and the Ukraine War, and the Syrian War, and the Libyan War, and every other massive catastrophe you can point to with America's fingerprints on it. | ||
All come from the same like 12 people. | ||
And then when it all blows up in their face and becomes a horrible disaster, they get promoted and they get to start a new initiative to create more crimes against humanity. | ||
So yeah, get rid of the State Department while you're at it. | ||
60 Minutes executive producer has resigned, claiming he's not allowed to make independent decisions. | ||
Another one of these stories where you read the headline, you go, good for him. | ||
Good for him. | ||
You know, we need independent media. | ||
And if they're forcing him to say, then, you know, he's standing up against, he's not going to be coerced. | ||
That was my, I mean, when you hear something like that, hey, I refuse to not be independent. | ||
If I can't be independent, I'm not sticking with this job. | ||
And like, wow, there's a guy standing up for his principles. | ||
Until you look at even just the barest details and you figure out that actually he's just mad, he can't lie anymore. | ||
Literally, he's, literally, he was told. | ||
By CBS, the executives, you're not allowed to deceptively edit things anymore. | ||
And so he said, I'm leaving. | ||
I'm not even kidding. | ||
Owens said that, Bill Owens said that, quote, over the past months, it's become clear that I would not be allowed to run the show as I always have run it to make independent decisions based on what was right for 60 Minutes, right for the audience. | ||
His departure comes after President Donald Trump sued CBS for $10 billion in what he called deceptively edited interview with former Vice President Kamala Harris and amid pressure from CBS news parent company Paramount. | ||
So yeah, literally this guy running 60 Minutes completely deceptively edited multiple things, but in this case in particular, the conversation with Kamala Harris where She was asked a question. | ||
Her answer was rambling and nonsensical. | ||
They swapped that out with a different answer from a different part of the interview to present her as good as possible to try to push her over the top in a purely corrupt political activity. | ||
And now they're being sued. | ||
And this guy's like, if I can't do the show the way I want, if I can't continue to propagandize and deceive and lie with deceptive editing, then I won't be here anymore. | ||
It's like, okay, good. | ||
Treasonous bastard. | ||
Meanwhile, this is more on that story. | ||
Well, whatever. | ||
We won't go back to it. | ||
But Postmillennial has a good breakdown of the Supreme Court decision about the LGBT and they say they blew holes in the argument that kindergartners LGBTQ concepts are not coercive. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm telling you. | |
I don't know, man. | ||
I mean, people, maybe people who don't have kids don't get it. | ||
Or don't hang around kids don't get it. | ||
My daughter is two years old. | ||
She has a fire truck that's about the size of a loaf of bread. | ||
And she tries to get into it to drive it. | ||
Okay? When you're talking about kids, it's not just like, oh, they don't know the world because they haven't been introduced to it. | ||
Like, literally they are... | ||
They're in a different world. | ||
Their reality is different than you and I's. | ||
And they don't understand things. | ||
I mean, this might be obvious to you. | ||
Children don't understand things. | ||
Right? My daughter, literally, she's like shoving her foot into the little door that's like the size of a, you know, business card. | ||
And is like mad. | ||
And is going, Ann, Ann, I want to get in. | ||
It's like you can't, it's a toy. | ||
It's the size of a, of a shoebox. | ||
You can't get in that. | ||
She doesn't understand because she's a baby. | ||
She's a child. | ||
They don't understand things like that, okay? | ||
My four-year-old can drive a car. | ||
That is true. | ||
That is true. | ||
But he also thinks I'm withholding the button that turns it into a spaceship. | ||
So they live in a fantasy world. | ||
They don't understand what is real. | ||
You take children like this into a realm where you're talking to them about... | ||
Sexual things and confusing them between boys and girls. | ||
I mean, it is evil. | ||
This is evil crap, you guys. | ||
How parents let them get away with this, I can't possibly understand it. | ||
My son is a very good driver, though, so I'll give him that. | ||
Boomers disapprove of Trump more than any other demographic, most of whom approve. | ||
So, look, all I'm saying here, get mad at me all you want. | ||
Statistically, I'm right about boomers, okay? | ||
The statistics bear it out. | ||
Trust the science. | ||
There's something wrong with boomers. | ||
Boomers are another identity I didn't mention. | ||
Here's the thing. | ||
Never ask. | ||
This is going to be a very offensive thing to say, but this is my experience. | ||
Never ask black people about crime, Catholics about the Pope, Jews about Israel, or boomers about anything. | ||
Okay? They can't handle it. | ||
I don't know what these identities involve, but it really is strange. | ||
It really is strange. | ||
How all of these populations, it's like, I will agree with people on 100% of everything that we believe. | ||
We believe or we're exactly dead on, exactly aligned. | ||
But then if it comes to something with their identity, Their brains become mush, and I don't get it. | ||
Did you notice how, when they said there was an anti-Christian task force, I was against that, even though, ostensibly, it would benefit me as a Christian to have a government body imposing my beliefs on everybody, but I'm against that because, | ||
by principle, it's wrong. | ||
Why it is that certain demographics can't do that, I don't understand it. | ||
Same thing when people go, man, millennials are the worst. | ||
I'm a millennial. | ||
My response is, yeah, we are. | ||
We suck. | ||
It's terrible. | ||
You should see my friends. | ||
You should see them. | ||
It's hopeless. | ||
It's a bad situation. | ||
For some reason, you talk about boomers, and boomers get all hot under the collar. | ||
Get over it, boomers. | ||
It turns out the baby boomers are the ones who hate Trump the most. | ||
A new pullout from... | ||
Real clear shows that the oldest voters who strongly disapprove of Trump, when asked to do you approve or disapprove of the job Donald Trump is doing as president, those of the president's own age group issued a resounding no. | ||
The youngest cohort, 18 to 29, approved of Trump by two points, as did everybody else. | ||
But not boomers. | ||
Because boomers grew up in a world where they thought they could trust the system, and they're having trouble getting out of that mindset, I have to say. | ||
What you should be realizing is not that, oh my gosh, things are so different now. | ||
All of these systems are being hijacked and destroyed by people. | ||
You should be realizing these systems were never honest to you. | ||
These systems were always lying to you. | ||
Now it's just being exposed. | ||
But I think that is the, it's really a, like I sort of sympathize with them to a certain extent. | ||
These people who are like, who think like, you know, 60 minutes from CBS is like a reliable source. | ||
And it freaks them out. | ||
They're like, I get it. | ||
It's like, I would rather go to a, you know, premier, important, powerful company that has been there for 50 years and has made a name for itself as the news show of all news shows. | ||
And it's like, yeah, they should be the best, but they're just despicable liars, every one of them. | ||
So I get that there's like this fear of like, we can't just have a ton of people just independently posting things on the internet without a system in place. | ||
To fact check it? | ||
It freaks them out. | ||
It's scary, but get over it. | ||
It's actually better. | ||
It's more truthful. | ||
You just liked being deceived from a singular source and it freaks you out to be told the truth from a whole bunch of different sources. | ||
Please get over it. | ||
Law firm Fighting Trump asks judges to permanently block executive orders. | ||
Law firms Perkins Coie and Wilmer Hale asked judges on Wednesday to block President Trump's executive orders. | ||
These March orders target firms perceived as adversaries because of specific past legal representations. | ||
Yeah, but remember they told them, they said, no, we'll do pro bono work. | ||
We'll write the anti-Semitism laws for you. | ||
Remember they made that very generous offer? | ||
But apparently that's not working. | ||
And it's like, okay, yeah, I mean, if you want to do your most powerful thing you could possibly do to encourage the destruction of our system of government and the establishment of an authoritarian regime, then keep it up, folks. | ||
Keep it up. | ||
Keep insisting that judges interfere where they don't have authority. | ||
Insist that you hamstring Trump at every pass by invoking vague and obscure bureaucratic processes. | ||
To tie his hand. | ||
So keep it up. | ||
Keep it up. | ||
Because the answer that more and more people are calling for is for Trump to just do away with all of this. | ||
And basically just become emperor. | ||
Which wouldn't be a good thing. | ||
Personally, I don't want that. | ||
But that's just me. | ||
Alright, that's about all of the political stuff I care to bring up. | ||
Although... It broke right after the show yesterday, and Alex Jones probably spent enough time on it himself, but the World Economic Forum has a new supervillain in charge. | ||
So the hive of villainy has a new queen, and it's the Nestle executive who is most famous for saying you don't deserve water without asking permission from him first. | ||
So pretty in line with what we expect. | ||
Now, bizarrely, the World Economic Forum has actually opened a probe into founder Klaus Schwab. | ||
Folks, Klaus Schwab is being probed. | ||
There is a probe into Klaus Schwab as we speak. | ||
I can't help but think he's loving it. | ||
An anal Schwab. | ||
He's being Schwabed. | ||
Klaus Schwab is being Schwabed. | ||
He's being probed. | ||
They're investigating whistleblower allegations, including use of luxury, property, and travel. | ||
What? Klaus Schwab? | ||
Luxury travel? | ||
You have to be kidding me. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll be right back, TG. You know what, I forgot to put a video and I'm going to put it in right now. | |
It's great seeing everybody wake up. | ||
It really is. | ||
I congratulate everyone from breaking out of the matrix, from emerging from the cave into the sunlight. | ||
unidentified
|
In this place, in this... | |
Particular instance, I'm talking about Glenn Beck coming to a conclusion that InfoWars has been screaming from the rooftops for 30 years now. | ||
And as much as InfoWars talks about its longevity, there's a reason that we do it. | ||
And it's because there's a lot of people out there right now that are a little bit too big for their britches, quite frankly. | ||
And I think they're like four years of... | ||
Knowing about stuff means that they somehow are more knowledgeable than Alex Jones or InfoWars. | ||
And it's like, guys, you're 30 years late. | ||
You're so far behind, you think you're winning the race. | ||
Here's Glenn Beck talking about managed decline in America. | ||
unidentified
|
So you're not a conspiracy theorist, but you actually think that this is well thought through. | |
How do you not? | ||
Come on. | ||
How do people not see that at this point? | ||
You couldn't be this wrong every time. | ||
If you tried, you have to be brilliant to be this wrong all the time. | ||
You know what I mean? | ||
There's no way it always falls to that side. | ||
And it's because they are... | ||
Managing the decline. | ||
That's all they're doing, is managing the decline. | ||
And Donald Trump is the first guy to, A, say, this is really, I understand it because I'm not a tariff guy, but it's really pissing me off. | ||
Because, well, I'm not a tariff guy. | ||
You're not a tariff guy because I haven't turned you to an economic populist yet. | ||
We're going to get there. | ||
I'm not a tariff guy, but I will tell you this. | ||
That guy, he's the only one, he's the only doctor we've had. | ||
In probably my lifetime, since maybe Reagan, they will actually tell you and say, yeah, you're riddled with cancer. | ||
And this whole body is going to die unless we start cutting the cancer out. | ||
And at this point, it has to be so radical that it's like chemotherapy. | ||
You use chemotherapy hoping that it doesn't kill the human body. | ||
Before it kills the cancer. | ||
Go back. | ||
I want to talk about managed decline. | ||
What do you mean by that? | ||
Do you think the elites in our country of both, almost the neoliberal neocons, it is about the managed decline of the country? | ||
I mean, they don't like America. | ||
They don't think that we deserve to be America. | ||
They don't see a value in America. | ||
They don't, none of them seem to be looking for an answer. | ||
They believe we're colonists here. | ||
We've taken this land illegally. | ||
And yet, those people, I mean, Steve. | ||
Help me out on this one. | ||
You remember Occupy Wall Street? | ||
Oh, yeah. | ||
Okay. They were against Wall Street. | ||
Tim Pool and all those guys. | ||
They were all against Wall Street. | ||
They were all, we got to take down Wall Street. | ||
Then all of a sudden, Occupy Wall Street just disappeared. | ||
Yeah. And they start popping up at the World Economic Forum. | ||
Right. Okay. | ||
And then all of those people that they were camping out in front of, all of those big corporations, the big banks. | ||
All of the big banks and big corporations start writing them quiet checks to fund, honestly. | ||
The NGOs and all that. | ||
It is clearly, leave us alone. | ||
Just leave us alone. | ||
We hear you. | ||
We hear you. | ||
And so it only makes sense, because everybody said to me for the longest time, Glenn, there's too much money at stake. | ||
The people with money are never going to let this thing collapse. | ||
They're right. | ||
They're going to change it. | ||
They'll have their place at the table. | ||
They'll adapt. | ||
They'll adapt. | ||
And they're spinning this thing down into something else. | ||
Okay? And we all know it. | ||
I mean, you just watched the first speech that Joe Biden gave as his first... | ||
His first speech he gave in front of Congress when everybody was still wearing masks and they were like sitting six feet apart. | ||
Yeah, a couple weeks after. | ||
unidentified
|
So it's not called State of the Union. | |
It's a joint address to Congress. | ||
And in that, he said things that I've not heard anybody else talk about. | ||
He looked, instead of at the camera, he looked at the people in the house. | ||
Managed to decline. | ||
Purposeful destruction of America has been the rule of the day for a long time now. | ||
Welcome to the We'll be right back. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Very happy to welcome back my guest, Drew Arnold. | ||
He runs Invisible Inquiry, an open source directory documenting the intersection of money, power, and influence. | ||
You can follow him on X at invisible underscore INQ. | ||
That's invisible underscore INQ on X and the website invisibleinq.com. | ||
Drew, thank you so much for joining us once again. | ||
Harrison, Matt, it's so good to be here. | ||
You know, I've got a surprise for you today, so I'm so glad you have me back on and so glad to share it with you. | ||
Well, I know it's been exciting watching you sort of build this platform of research and utilize these tools, and sort of each time you come on, we see how it's been built up and expanding, and you're creating these almost neural networks, these maps of the interconnectedness of all these different NGOs and the people involved, | ||
and it's just fascinating. | ||
Finally, sort of put together the depopulation agenda. | ||
I mean, run us through what you've been able to establish with access to this powerful research tool and all the information out of USAID. | ||
For sure. | ||
Yeah, you know, last time we talked, I was discussing how USAID funded Wuhan labs, and I think I showed very clearly that that was the case. | ||
I had this, like, idea, right, that maybe there is something because there... | ||
U.S. CID had a population office. | ||
It turned into a family planning office because the vernacular wasn't appropriate at the time. | ||
But their office on population was really interesting to me. | ||
And I said, you know what, maybe I should look into this. | ||
And in the process of doing so, I uncovered the depopulation network, starting from the 1900s all the way till now. | ||
It had this amazing effect on the planet, probably prevented about 2 billion births. | ||
Sterilized, as an example, one-third of the women in India. | ||
And it spread to every country across the planet. | ||
Now, I think what's really interesting about this is that it's not just this story of Planned Parenthood and wanting women to have control over their lives. | ||
This actually gets to the intersection of Planned Parenthood and the military-industrial complex and philanthropies like the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation. | ||
So when you think of, when people think of Planned Parenthood, they think of a generous organization that likes to help women. | ||
In fact, it is part of the military-industrial complex. | ||
It's part of the New World Order. | ||
And today I'm going to show that to you. | ||
Okay, so explain that. | ||
I mean, obviously it plays into, I mean, I can see where they're sort of going in the same direction, but explain how they're actually intertwined to that degree. | ||
Absolutely. I can just show it to you. | ||
And I think that would be a much easier thing to do than to explain it, which is the reason why I'm building these graphs to start with. | ||
So first of all, there's this amazing resource that I discovered. | ||
So this book is called The World Population Crisis by Phyllis Tilson Pietro. | ||
And in it, she describes everything that happened in order to create a lot of these population organizations from the UN to What's really interesting about this book is that the foreword is written by then U.S. Representative to the U.N., | ||
George H.W. Bush. | ||
This is 1974, where he discusses about how his father lost an election because he was involved with Planned Parenthood. | ||
So, you know, this is a seminal moment in history. | ||
But what's more important about this and what... | ||
Bush says is that this is a story of individuals and institutions struggling to solve a new kind of worldwide problem within the framework of individual choice and responsible government. | ||
What he's saying here is that this is how the depopulation or population offices came to be. | ||
And this is an amazing repository of information from people on the inside to how this happened. | ||
And from that, I was able to create... | ||
A graph. | ||
Now, this is a bird's-eye view of it, of milestones that lead from the beginning of Planned Parenthood all the way over here. | ||
So why is that one all the way over there? | ||
This is the timeline. | ||
Okay, so that's the timeline. | ||
Yeah, so this is the timeline. | ||
So it sort of started there, but then it doesn't look like there's a lot of activity, and then it starts to pick up and gets really busy. | ||
So from left to right, we're going from the past to the present? | ||
To 1974, when the book was written. | ||
This is just one resource. | ||
This is that book. | ||
It has just about everything you could possibly want from that kind of data. | ||
I'm going to start first, actually, because I think it's really important to talk about Planned Parenthood. | ||
This is the evolution of Planned Parenthood. | ||
This is not from that document. | ||
This is from Planned Parenthood documents. | ||
The evolution of Planned Parenthood through the different Planned Parenthood vehicles. | ||
Over the course of time. | ||
So this would be the 1950s. | ||
I'm sorry, this is the 1940s here. | ||
This would be the 1950s down here. | ||
And I think the 1970s here. | ||
What's really interesting is that you see immediately some really high-powered people who are part of it. | ||
I'm not going to go through all of them. | ||
Some of them would take a little bit more of an explanation. | ||
I've got a lot to talk about here. | ||
But you'll notice immediately we have names like Eleanor Roosevelt. | ||
And a woman named Carola Warburg Rothschild, who was there at the beginning of these Planned Parenthood organizations. | ||
That's two very powerful names, the Warburgs and the Rothschilds. | ||
Those are two very powerful banking families. | ||
Yeah, and there are many more in here, but for the sake of brevity and just to gloss over, I just wanted to show how Planned Parenthood started so we can start to get an idea about the influences that these organizations had. | ||
Yeah, and just to back you up a little bit, I'm amazed that George H. Bush wrote the foreword to that book, and you said 1976, right? | ||
That was 1974. | ||
1974, that's right, because in 1976 is when he actually became the director of the CIA. | ||
So he was actually in the CIA while serving as a U.S. ambassador. | ||
And writing the foreword to this book about the world population crisis. | ||
So just put it in context, he was at the CIA at that point, only to be appointed to director two years later. | ||
But he was a CIA agent serving as UN ambassador and writing the foreword to this book about world population to set the ball really rolling on the population crisis control containment operation. | ||
So just some context there. | ||
Absolutely. And why will be very clear shortly. | ||
I want to fast forward here because we started in 1900. | ||
I want to jump to 1955. | ||
This is when the UN starts getting involved in the population issue. | ||
Before this, we have somewhere in here, excuse me, we have Rockefeller, John D. Rockefeller, writing publications, really pushing for the UN and other organizations to start getting involved. | ||
He starts putting out reports and starts pushing members of Congress and people in the military industrial complex to start acting on this Malthusian idea that they're... | ||
There'll be too many people in the world and we have to do something to stop it. | ||
Right. Right. | ||
So here's where it gets interesting. | ||
of Rockefeller's idea and his pushing, there's an organization called the Draper Committee that comes together. | ||
Now, the Draper Committee... | ||
Let me see if I can get my right graph here. | ||
I gotta say, if you're a radio viewer, you're missing out. | ||
The visuals here are just incredible. | ||
And if you've seen Drew on us with us before, you've seen some of this, but every time you show us, it seems to be more elaborate and sort of like it's three-dimensional. | ||
It's just really cool the way you can visualize this. | ||
Personally, I'm a visual learner in a lot of ways. | ||
It helps me make sense of what I understand when I can see it laid out like this. | ||
So it really is incredible visuals. | ||
Yeah, and this is exactly why I do it, because this is how I like to learn. | ||
I love to see connections between organizations. | ||
So what I'm showing you now is the organization that came together to confer to get Eisenhower to create the Draper Committee. | ||
Now you've got J. William Fulbright who comes together later, but you have members of the Scottish Rite. | ||
Project Paperclip, Committee on the Foreign Relations, different Freemasonic individuals, Joint Committee on Defense Production, Joint Committee on Inaugural Arrangements. | ||
There's more. | ||
Packard Company. | ||
These are really high-powered bankers, high-powered industrialists, high-powered people who were working at the intersection of the military-industrial complex. | ||
This is around 1955 to 19, you know, working as the head of Goldman Sachs. | ||
This is like 1955 to 1958. | ||
They say, hey, look, Eisenhower put together an organization that studies what is important for America to have American hegemony in the future. | ||
And what they came up with was a council. | ||
Now, this council was made up of even more powerful people. | ||
This is called the Draper Committee, and the Draper Committee is the precursor to USAID. | ||
This is the organization that says put USAID together and specifically... | ||
Now, I'm going to go through this because this is very important. | ||
This is the intersection of the military-industrial complex meeting and the creation of USAID. | ||
So you'll see John J. McCloy, who helped found the OSS, which eventually became the CIA. | ||
He helped found the Atlantic Institute. | ||
He was part of the OSS. | ||
He was a president of Chase Manhattan. | ||
He was part of the Rockefeller Foundation. | ||
He was the second president of the World Bank, and he was part of the Wiseman and was part of the Council on Foreign Relations. | ||
These are the things, I'm sorry to interrupt, but it just always blows my mind when you hear about people like this from history. | ||
So, I'm sorry if the crew can bring it up full screen again because it's a little too small for me to read. | ||
So, OSS, precursor to the CIA, the Atlantic Institute, Chase Manhattan Bank, Rockefeller Foundation, World Bank. | ||
I mean, the Council on Foreign Relations, I mean, how can one person be involved in so much evil? | ||
It's almost admirable, but it's like, it's crazy how many people. | ||
We don't even know their names. | ||
That's a cross-section. | ||
We've got the Ford Foundation. | ||
We've got, you know, all these other organizations that he's a part of. | ||
And that's just a cross-section. | ||
I see Monsanto, Council on Foreign. | ||
It's like, oh yeah, the Rockefellers and the World Bank and the CFR, you know, all the people that love you and want what's best for you, right? | ||
They're doing things for the sake of humanity because they're so good and, you know, moral. | ||
It's like, I've never seen a greater cacophony of evil in my life. | ||
So sorry, sorry to interrupt. | ||
Go on, sir. | ||
Yeah. So the beauty of this graph is we can see connections, right? | ||
So we see the Council on Foreign Relations, who John J. McCloy is part of. | ||
We also have another individual who's a part of that, and we go here. | ||
This is William Henry Draper. | ||
Now, Draper is the key person, one of two key people, who's a part of this population, the USAID population program. | ||
Draper, you can see, he comes from Skull and Bones. | ||
He's the Inland Steel Company and all kinds of other... | ||
I mean, he's the President's Council on International Activities at Yale. | ||
He's got his own investment company. | ||
He's an early Silicon Valley guy. | ||
He's working with computers before anybody else is. | ||
And more. | ||
He works at the Dow Jones, etc. | ||
He's got his own investment organizations. | ||
There's more, right? | ||
I can go through this all day long. | ||
We've got guys who work with... | ||
This is James Webb, who's famous for working with NASA, the James Webb Telescope's named after. | ||
And this is really important for my future work. | ||
He's got connections to the University of North Carolina, which people don't really understand, is part of this secret apparatus that USAID did their developments in. | ||
Military production of gain-of-function research, stuff like that. | ||
Exactly, and more. | ||
And you'll see, I won't be able to show you in the documents because it's really diverse, but UNC is part of this operation at a large scale. | ||
This is, you know, this is that whole, the network of that organization that came together. | ||
I just wanted to show you that these guys were a part of creating USAID. | ||
It's on record. | ||
And we can also see that those same individuals are a part of Planned Parenthood, the Population Crisis Committee, International Planned Parenthood Federation, United Nations Population Commission. | ||
And there's more. | ||
That's just William Draper. | ||
I can go through this and show you all of the other Planned Parenthood members in here. | ||
But Draper is the key person to get this program up and running. | ||
Right. And so what we're seeing is these nodes where all the lines shoot out from are individuals. | ||
And then you see the interconnected way in which they're all a part of the same organizations that are all deeply intertwined with the military-industrial complex. | ||
Absolutely. So this is really the seminal moment in creation of USAID and specifically the Population Office. | ||
So we can fast forward a little bit. | ||
We're going through time here forward. | ||
And we can see that USAID is reorganized into the... | ||
An organization created was initially not USAID, but then turned into USAID. | ||
You have these organizations, and particularly Fulbright, who we saw earlier. | ||
And Draper, who are trying to get people like Eisenhower and then Kennedy involved. | ||
Now, Kennedy and Eisenhower wanted nothing to do with this. | ||
They didn't think it was worth what, you know, they were vehemently against it. | ||
Kennedy was a Catholic, and Eisenhower just thought it was a bad idea. | ||
This book admits that there are individuals working behind the scenes. | ||
Despite Eisenhower saying no, they continue. | ||
Right. Against his orders. | ||
So this is the military-industrial complex. | ||
When you think about Eisenhower warning, this may be one of those factors involved. | ||
Now, Eisenhower didn't want to be a part of this at all. | ||
This graph starts to explode. | ||
We start getting more and more into, and you can see, it starts really picking up tempo at this point in time, creating these population offices. | ||
And this is around the 70s? | ||
No, this is still 1960. | ||
This is 1964. | ||
Okay. And what we have that's really interesting here is Bush is getting involved. | ||
H.W. Bush is getting involved. | ||
He was a congressman at this point in time. | ||
This is 1969. | ||
We're jumping to 1969 here. | ||
And there is a bill called the Tidings Shore Bush Bill. | ||
Now, these are three Congress people, including Herbert Walker Bush, who create a bill that eventually becomes Title X. And Title X is the bill that allocates. | ||
I'll have to check my notes here. | ||
I think around what's today $2 billion. | ||
I have to check my notes exactly. | ||
So it's $382 million for family planning services research, which goes primarily to USAID. | ||
And to the UN Population Office. | ||
And this is development of all kinds of things that I'll show you in a bit. | ||
So, yeah, you can see how this organization comes together, how every piece and part is the introduction of Title X all the way up until 1974. | ||
Now, these guys... | ||
This is a seminal moment because 1974, while the book ends here, it's actually the beginning of something even more amazing. | ||
Now, William Draper is also raising money behind the scenes. | ||
These population organizations are all starting to come together because there is just money pouring into them. | ||
So they're staffing up at this point in time in 1970. | ||
By 1970, USAID Population Office has about 100 people working at it, and they're in India, Pakistan, Indonesia, putting out contraceptives because by 1959, the pill comes out, right? | ||
So contraceptions is this amazing new thing, and they're putting it out all across the world. | ||
Right, and that sort of comports to what we've heard people like Aldous Huxley talk about. | ||
Where you're saying, you know, the New World Order thinks like we have death control, but we have no life control. | ||
We need to, you know, stop all these births, you know, to correspond with how good we are at stopping death. | ||
So, I mean, all this plays into this wider view of what he predicted or wasn't even predicting was telling people was the plan for the future New World Order. | ||
Yeah, absolutely. | ||
And in this is a man named R.T. Ravenhold, who is the mad scientist behind the population office. | ||
R.T. Ravenhold is the Quintessential mad scientist, when we think of people like Fauci, Ravenholt came first. | ||
He was doing studies that forced fertilization of rabbits without a male donor, meaning that he was just able to take an egg and force it to self-fertilize. | ||
This is back in 1954, I think. | ||
This kind of mad scientist thing, he was eventually pushed out of USAID in 1979. | ||
He developed the entire USAID population strategy with the Rockefeller Foundation and others. | ||
And I want to showcase, because I'm going to jump out of this graph shortly, because I have one more sector of it, and it just gets really... | ||
unidentified
|
Let's see if I can show everything here. | |
So this is adding one more dimension. | ||
What I just showed you were milestones. | ||
And these are all of the individuals and organizations who worked to help. | ||
So you can see there's a lot of activity. | ||
The higher up they go, we've got a big thing, right? | ||
There's a lot of people working at the very base who are helping support a lot of entities and organizations. | ||
The higher up we go, the more important and the more, according to the book, the more often there is. | ||
So we have people like William Draper, who we saw earlier. | ||
You have George. | ||
unidentified
|
Push. Mm-hmm. | |
If I can zoom in on him, I want to make that big enough for your audience. | ||
Wow, that's so cool. | ||
Right? We have, and we can see, whoops, we can see everybody he's connected to by clicking on these lines. | ||
And we have other rapers down there again. | ||
We have Lyndon B. Johnson, who is a president. | ||
It goes on and on. | ||
We have the Ford Foundation. | ||
We have William Fulbright, who... | ||
People know from the Fulbright Scholarship, but when you click on any of these lines here, it'll show you in my little box exactly more details about it from the book. | ||
So this is a quintessential map and almost, I mean, I don't really understand it because there's so much going on in it, but this is effectively a layout of how these population offices got moving, who was behind them. | ||
From the very bottom, people who were doing maybe Listed once in the book, like whoever's Sherman Adams, I don't know, to people who are much more involved. | ||
Yeah, you have the Pope who's involved, or mentioned, I should say mentioned, John Rock, who created the birth, helped create the birth control pill, and many, many others. | ||
So I know we're going to move on. | ||
I just want to sort of show how amazing this book was and how detailed. | ||
And how much of a visualization we can get. | ||
Yeah, it's just over understanding. | ||
Yeah, it's so complicated. | ||
I mean, you know, you can only do something like this with AI. | ||
For a human being to go through and map all this out would take a century or more. | ||
So, you know, we're opening up vistas of information that are only possible because of AI at this point. | ||
And now you're plugging in, you know, old books, but they're chock full of information and just mapping it out. | ||
And so we're fully seeing. | ||
You know, how this came about and, you know, where it goes, who was involved and what their intentions may be. | ||
We'll come back on the other side of a short commercial break to talk about it more. | ||
This is just an absolutely amazing tool. | ||
And again, I'm surprised at all these names. | ||
I'm hearing some that I recognize, even just like George H. Bush. | ||
You know, you forget how central he was as a kingpin of the New World Order. | ||
Obviously, he's the one that popularized that. | ||
Phrase in the first place, but from all the way back in the 60s, he was involved in this stuff, and it shows you, you know, what can happen when you play along with these types of agendas and policies that are being pursued by the world controllers and the puppeteers. | ||
We'll be back with Drew Arnold after a short commercial break. | ||
You can follow Drew on X at invisible underscore INQ. | ||
You can go to invisibleinq.com. | ||
More on the other side as we expose the map of corruption keeping us enslaved. | ||
That's basically what you're pointing out. | ||
You're showing us the bars to the jail that we've been in for a long time. | ||
Crazy stuff, folks. | ||
unidentified
|
Stay with us. | |
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
Very exciting segment we have with Drew Arnold. | ||
He runs Invisible Inquiry. | ||
You can follow them on X at invisible underscore INQ. | ||
And the website, invisibleinq.com, where you can see some of this stuff. | ||
And we were talking during the break. | ||
He's going to start coming out with more videos and presentations about this. | ||
So make sure that you are subscribed to him or follow him on X at invisible underscore INQ. | ||
And now, right before we pick it up, I do want to just... | ||
Laid out for everybody so we understand why this all happened in 1950. | ||
And it is obvious if you think about it, but just after World War II, Europe was devastated. | ||
That was the center of power for a millennia before then. | ||
The U.S. through the Marshall Plan, I mean, we were for the first time a hegemonic power. | ||
And at the time, you have to remember, and just put yourself in this mindset, we were the only ones with a nuke. | ||
The Soviets hadn't gotten the nuke yet. | ||
You know, they were potentially setting up a hegemony that could last forever, almost like the Empire from Star Wars with a Death Star, eliminating any distance. | ||
I mean, the possibilities were endless. | ||
So here you have this massive war that basically wipes the slate clean in terms of European governments and world government. | ||
And you have for the first time both the technology and the just geopolitical establishment for America to dominate the world. | ||
Wanting to make the most out of this. | ||
And we're making plans for a new world in their vision to rebuild from Europe in a way that comported with their vision of what humanity should be. | ||
So it's hard to imagine what these guys were experiencing back in the 1950s following World War II. | ||
The amount of power and influence they have really cannot be overstated. | ||
And they wanted to make the most of that. | ||
And so all these characters that... | ||
I mean, bizarrely, some of them are still a part of American life. | ||
I know we're about to get into Henry Kissinger. | ||
Well, Kissinger's understudy was Klaus Schwab. | ||
Like, the reverberations of what these guys got up to starting in the 50s through the 70s is still being felt today, and it really goes a lot to explaining just how we ended up where we are now. | ||
So, just getting back into it, we're talking about the depopulation agenda, how it's... | ||
Tied into the government and the military-industrial complex, and all of it grew out of this post-war American domination, and I just wanted to give that sort of historical context. | ||
Drew, I know you want to pick it up with Henry Kissinger getting involved, and that's never a phrase you want to hear. | ||
Well, where do we start here? | ||
Well, this is interesting. | ||
And you did bring up the Marshall Plan. | ||
And I think it's important to note that the guys who were part of the Draper Committee were part of the Marshall Plan, were some of the key organizers of the Marshall Plan. | ||
So they were on there. | ||
I didn't show that, but they are in that graph. | ||
I mean, this is exactly it. | ||
This gets into American hegemony, but more than that, this sort of like behind-the-scenes industrial hegemony that's going on via the Rockefellers and the Rockefeller Foundation. | ||
They've built this huge network. | ||
They've got Planned Parenthood involved. | ||
They've got the military-industrial complex involved. | ||
What is the purpose of all of this, right? | ||
The USAID Population Office is popping off right now. | ||
So in comes Kissinger, and he has this idea. | ||
Kissinger has a plan. | ||
He is going to take what's happening and he is going to industrialize it. | ||
Now, Kissinger creates a memo | ||
NSSM 200. | ||
I've got that here. | ||
This was created in 1974, about the time when that book was written or published. | ||
And in it, this is Kissinger taking everything that's happening with the population agenda and putting the entire force of the military behind it. | ||
So this goes to the Secretary of Defense, Secretary of Agriculture, CIA, Secretary of State, and USAID. | ||
And what he says is the president has directed a study of the impact of world population growth and security. | ||
So notice how those are security and overseas interests have to do with population. | ||
The study should look forward to at least the year 2000 and use several alternative reasonable projections of population growth. | ||
What this is, is a Trojan horse for a global surveillance system using population control. | ||
So where better to take a survey than the bedrooms of human beings all across the world? | ||
And that's what this is. | ||
This is a Trojan horse for a massive surveillance system through those population surveys. | ||
So this was 1974 was when that was published. | ||
Right. Well, it was released, declassified in 1981, I think. | ||
But this is a classified document that was later released. | ||
This is the survey. | ||
They finally figure out what to do. | ||
This is World Technology Trends. | ||
They're going to be looking at population and world food supplies and developing the World Population Conference. | ||
And in that, they go into everything from research to improve fertility control technology and utilization of mass media and satellite communication systems for family planning. | ||
So this is mass media and development of new technologies and low-cost delivery systems. | ||
USAID is supercharged at this point in time. | ||
And they start putting out... | ||
This is sort of the demographic in all of these. | ||
I mean, I can go through these all day. | ||
There are just page after page of research. | ||
This is the first use of computers and survey systems. | ||
This is how important it is. | ||
This is all computerized in 1974 when computers are just getting up and running. | ||
And this is 1974. | ||
So this is happening immediately. | ||
They're comparing birth rates from 1960 to 1974. | ||
I mean, we can go through this all day long. | ||
There are scores of documents that just show charts and graphs of... | ||
Oops, we'll get to that in a second. | ||
But yeah, we'll... | ||
unidentified
|
So... Look, we have this... | |
Idea about population control in USAID. | ||
I just want to give you the gravity of how sophisticated the system became. | ||
And this is what I could map from all of the documents of all of the USAID. | ||
I'm not going to go through this in detail. | ||
These are all of the programs that USAID took part in and populated basically the depopulation. | ||
These are partnerships. | ||
These are development. | ||
These are distribution projects. | ||
I mean, it goes on and on and on, and you can just see how sophisticated this operation was. | ||
I just have this alphabetically listed. | ||
This is from 1974 to, I think, 19, sorry, 2011. | ||
And it just shows you, I mean, how broad this program is. | ||
Yeah, absolutely huge. | ||
And again, you can just imagine... | ||
These guys after World War II going, hey, the world is our chessboard now. | ||
They didn't have computers back then, but the world is our computer chip. | ||
Let's program it how we want. | ||
They were on top of the world, and they knew it, and they wanted to make the most out of it. | ||
I bring that up because it's like, just imagine if you were in that position, what you would do, what I would do. | ||
We'd want things flourishing. | ||
We'd want just to improve prosperity everywhere. | ||
That's not these guys' intention. | ||
they have different motives for what they're doing. | ||
So just it's crazy to imagine these people literally sitting around in a conference room and going, let's dictate the population of the world and where people will grow and where they'll die. | ||
I mean, it's just they really were puffing themselves up a little bit too much, I think. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Yeah. So from 2011 on... | ||
We have access to digital data and databases, right? | ||
Because beforehand, I was just scanning PDFs. | ||
Those were all PDFs that I came up with as data. | ||
This is every transaction that happened with relation to the population program from 2011 and where it went to, which country it went to. | ||
It's a global thing, and you can see just how big and deep it is. | ||
Every major country in the world is... | ||
Affected by this population program, right? | ||
I mean, this is our money. | ||
This is U.S. taxpayer dollars that are going out to control the population of other countries, right? | ||
I mean, and it goes on and on. | ||
I won't go through. | ||
This graph is a little bit slow because there are just so many transactions and I won't. | ||
It's unimaginable. | ||
Yeah, so this is representative of 380,000 transactions. | ||
That happened between 2011 to different programs that took place in different parts of the world. | ||
So what a lot of people don't realize, and this is one of the things that I discovered that was really amazing, is that USAID developed almost every major contraceptive on the market. | ||
So when we talk about, and I've gone through and I've mapped that out here. | ||
Through some of those programs, we have the development of, I mean, we can go through this. | ||
This is everything from the copper IUDs to all kinds of different chemicals, progesterone chemicals, everything, tubal rings, different kinds of abortive pills, DMPA, things that people use nowadays, things that have taken off the market because they tested them in countries and had negative effects and killed people. | ||
It's all here. | ||
We have Norplant. | ||
This was taken off the market. | ||
These kinds of things, most of this stuff went to market. | ||
Did I just see anti-sperm vaccine on there to the right? | ||
I mean, there's a lot, folks. | ||
So USAID, yeah, anti-sperm vaccine, LDH, C4, Fragment. | ||
I mean, so how was USAID responsible for creating all of these contraceptives? | ||
Yeah, so all of that program list that I showed you earlier, they work in conjunction with places like University of North Carolina and other organizations to help develop this. | ||
So they're sending U.S. taxpayer dollars as a way to supplement cost of development. | ||
And so USAID is the biggest producer in terms of funding of contraceptives across the planet. | ||
And so you can see some of the partnerships here, Pfizer International, FemCare Incorporated, World Health Organizations coming in and helping fund, UNFPA, Duke University is doing some of the development. | ||
And then, of course, we have University of North Carolina that pops up over and over and over again when we talk about USAID, Johns Hopkins, which is GPagio. | ||
Yeah, so this is, and Pathfinder, this is a USCID program that most of these is operating through. | ||
And to give you one more perspective of how this works, this is the last major map I will show you, which is distribution. | ||
I showed you earlier how they produced all of these contraceptives. | ||
Then it came to delivery. | ||
Now, this is the delivery vehicle. | ||
This is how USAID delivered all of these contraceptives across the planet. | ||
So you can see, I mean, these green dots here, there's a lot going on. | ||
You can see these green dots all across the world, hitting every country in the world, maybe not North Korea, somehow missed Japan. | ||
And so this map here is a showcase of... | ||
Delivery systems. | ||
Each one of these represents money toward basically a delivery package of multiple different products. | ||
And these are the products that they delivered. | ||
Some of those were ones they developed. | ||
All of those are here. | ||
We can go through. | ||
I mean, it's even so tight you can't even read it, but you can see Norgestrel. | ||
And the way I have this outlined here, you have condoms, is by... | ||
How popular it is or how much they're used and how much it costs. | ||
So the further out they are is how increased cost per unit or how cheap they are if it's left, right? | ||
And then how much they used up top and how little they use the bottom. | ||
So it's increased use and increased cost. | ||
And you get DMPA up here, which is called Depo-Provera, which is an injectable that... | ||
It's also used as an abortive, so it can be an abortion pill. | ||
And you can see who the winners are. | ||
I have all of the fabricators of those. | ||
So all of those products are created by organizations, and these guys have pretty amazing contracts because you can see for a condom, there's really London International Group is creating that. | ||
And another one, why a pharmacy produces a few products. | ||
But here's where it gets really interesting because you have DMPA, which is their product seller, and you have one producer of DMPA. | ||
And that is a company called Pfizer. | ||
And so when we talk about the intersection of corporations and USAID, as we saw with Wuhan and everything that happened, there are major facilitators of producing The solutions to problems. | ||
And Pfizer Belgium is the biggest, I think, this contract that they had for DMPA from production to distribution was several billion dollars. | ||
So this is a lot of money for Pfizer. | ||
You can see where they get, where Pfizer gets continually put into positions where they're able to monetize their relationships for government. | ||
Right. So when we talk about, you know, exactly how did, how did, so the projections were that there would be 8 billion people on the planet by 2020. | ||
And what ended up happening by 2020, there were 6 billion. | ||
So the projection was 8. We ended up being 5.9 billion. | ||
So how did that happen? | ||
How did 2 billion people? | ||
How did the, I should say, how did the births of 2 billion people get prevented? | ||
This is the vehicle for doing it. | ||
And so were they successful? | ||
Herbert Walker Bush and Ravenholt, who is that mad scientist I told you, said that they would be successful. | ||
Their best case scenario is 6 billion people by 2000. | ||
And in fact, it was 5.9 billion who ended up being on the planet. | ||
So I would say that they beat their best. | ||
That is amazing. | ||
And of course, you know, from the 50s throughout the 60s and 70s, I mean, you had so many articles, you know, fear-mongering. | ||
We're going to run out of food. | ||
If there's 4 billion people in the world, half of them are going to starve to death. | ||
I mean, obviously that wasn't true. | ||
The resources we have are infinite. | ||
So what you've laid out for us here today is like starting in the 50s, just after World War II, you have these few groups of people all connected through. | ||
You know, secret societies and other various organizations starting to talk about population control. | ||
They start establishing organizations like USAID and others that by the 1970s are sort of geared up and ready to go and become this arm of the military-industrial complex distributing contraceptives around the world with the intention of vastly lowering the number of human beings on the planet. | ||
That's crazy. | ||
And Pfizer's involved, and all these big corporations, all the big organizations are involved in this. | ||
I mean, how did they do this for so long without anybody objecting? | ||
I mean, did nobody know this was happening, I wonder? | ||
Well, there were people, and I didn't show that part of it. | ||
They had an uphill battle throughout the 70s. | ||
And one of the reasons why they were not allowed to do abortions, which I can show you here at some point in time, they did have distribute maps. | ||
This is from USAID on how to do abortions. | ||
And so they were doing, you can see, second trimester abortions. | ||
They have late abortions. | ||
I mean, it's very graphic, what they have available. | ||
Well, the Catholic, different Catholic, this is second trimester abortion still. | ||
I mean, you have all kinds of Pamphlets on how to do this. | ||
Now, they had an uphill battle because while they wanted to do abortions all across the planet, they were stopped by Catholic societies and different Christian groups who acted, particularly with Republican members of Congress who stopped a lot of these bills. | ||
Ronald Reagan stopped it until Herbert Walker Bush intervened in 1982 or 83, where Ronald Reagan was going to defund, completely defund, These population programs through USAID. | ||
And Herbert Walker Bush comes in again and saves the day for the depopulation movement. | ||
Man, he really, I mean, Kingpin doesn't even do it justice. | ||
He really, I mean, from the JFK assassination to running drugs for the CIA, I mean, Herbert Bush, he has got to be one of those evil men that's ever lived. | ||
And it's crazy how How long his career in this type of activity was. | ||
Really crazy stuff. | ||
Yeah. And, you know, I wanted to know where this whole thing was now, right? | ||
Because we hear a lot about Bill Gates, and I think he's the favorite object. | ||
He's the shiny object in the room for conspiracy theorists. | ||
Right. And his father was head of Planned Parenthood, right? | ||
Yes, at some point in time. | ||
And so I didn't do any research on him yet in this, but what's interesting to me about this is that who's actually behind this is the Rockefeller Foundation. | ||
Who's supporting this now is the Ford Foundation. | ||
And I wanted to know where this was now. | ||
So I did a little bit of research and I found some really interesting characters, particularly ones that people haven't talked about. | ||
And I want to introduce your audience if they're not already familiar with Rajiv Shah, who is... | ||
Is the president of the Rockefeller Foundation. | ||
He was administrator of the United States International Development from 2010 to 2015, which, by the way, is when the Wuhan lab project got put into place. | ||
He was a part of, so he was part of GAVI, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization. | ||
He was a part of, he joined the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in a leadership role, and he served as USAID. | ||
He worked with Hillary Rodden Clinton, particularly with the Haiti earthquake after the Haiti earthquake. | ||
Oh, all of their humanitarian efforts, of course. | ||
Right. So when you look at where this organization is now and who are some of the individuals who I have yet to uncover, who I will be in future iterations of this, near future iterations of this, Rajiv Shah and other people like him are... | ||
on that list. | ||
So even though I have created this network of the past, I think we can get into the present very, very soon. | ||
It is wild. | ||
There's people like that you haven't even heard of. | ||
He's in charge of USAID. | ||
He's working with the Clintons on Haiti. | ||
I mean, even as you were scrolling through, I was seeing other stuff where it's like he reformed USAID to be a more private-public partnership. | ||
And it's like, yeah, all these guys are on exactly the same agenda. | ||
I mean, do you think they're taking orders from the same people? | ||
Do you think it's just they're all of the same mindset, so they all happen to go in that direction? | ||
I mean, what explains these decades of people, you know, working in the same, for the same ends, which seems to be total control and human depopulation? | ||
Like, how does, I just, I'm trying to wrap my mind around it. | ||
I don't know if you have an answer, but like, you know, how do you think this has gone on for so long? | ||
Yeah, I have a guess, and I think it's a little bit of both. | ||
I think there are people who are high-end administrators. | ||
And if you want to talk about an organization like the Deep State, I think there are people who are in the know. | ||
There are people who want to take orders from people in the know who may not know what's really going on. | ||
And then there are people who just do what they're told. | ||
And there are people who know what the game is at the bottom layer and just are there to be facilitators. | ||
You know, there are a lot of people who went to college. | ||
There are a lot of people who read these population studies. | ||
There are a lot of people who believe them. | ||
There are also a lot of people who know the inner workings of things, pay attention, and understand it. | ||
And I've, you know, I've worked with an organization called the United Nations Development Fund. | ||
They were one of my clients, and I can say that there are definitely layers to it of people who know and who are not, because I was working with the very top of that organization. | ||
So I think that, you know... | ||
There are people who are pushing it. | ||
There are organizations like Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. | ||
There are organizations like the Rockefeller Foundation and other organizations like the Ford Foundation and the Hewlett Foundation who are continuously showing up on this. | ||
They know what's going on. | ||
They have their agenda. | ||
And they're only going to work with the people who will push their agenda. | ||
So whether people know or not, it doesn't matter. | ||
They've got the money to do it, and they're going to find somebody to do it. | ||
Wow, it's just incredible. | ||
And again, the continuity that you see, it's the same names cropping up over and over again. | ||
It's the same organizations cropping up over and over again. | ||
As complicated and sort of convoluted as the images that you present with, I mean, you know, a tangled web we weave is the saying, right? | ||
It seems very complicated, but when you get right down to it, I think their motives are simple. | ||
I think their operations are simple. | ||
And at the end of the day, they just want control. | ||
They want power. | ||
And they don't want a whole bunch of people that can stand up against them. | ||
You know, we talk about anti-human. | ||
You know, I would always get questions about that when I first started working in Forbes, especially people would go, why do you call people anti-human? | ||
And it's like, well, you look at their behavior. | ||
You see what they value and what they don't. | ||
And when you have a giant, decades-long program to vastly reduce the human population, that's the word I'm going to stick on you. | ||
And it's Kissinger, who his understudy was Klaus Schwab. | ||
I mean, I guess we're in like the third or fourth generation of these guys, but they're all working in the same direction. | ||
And under the same direction, it seems. | ||
And of course, the crew pulls up the Georgia Guidestones, which seemed to be very in line with what these people believed. | ||
Just incredible stuff, as always. | ||
Drew Arnold on X at invisible underscore INQ, invisibleinq.com, Invisible Inquiry, just doing incredible stuff. | ||
I look so forward into the future of what you discover. | ||
What you can tell us next time. | ||
We'll have you on again soon, sir. | ||
Thank you for being with us. | ||
Absolutely. Thanks so much for having me on. | ||
And if you want more of this, follow me. | ||
It's more wars coming. | ||
Follow this man. | ||
Thanks for being with us, folks. | ||
Alex Jones, 90 seconds. | ||
Don't go anywhere. | ||
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
Infowars.com forward slash show. | ||
Methylene blue is all the rage. | ||
But for my listeners, we've been talking about it for decades. | ||
But finally, they've got factories. | ||
They've got laboratories that are producing medical, pharmaceutical, USP grade. | ||
And so, our sponsor, thealexshonestore.com, has it right now. | ||
The very highest quality. | ||
And I've taken USP grade before, and they claim it's USP grade, and it works great. | ||
Massive energy, clarity, focus, no letdown. | ||
This is 10 times better. | ||
I'm actually scared of this. | ||
I've seen Robert Kennedy Jr., you know, take three droppers on Air Force One. | ||
I took half a dropper and I'm bounced off the walls hours later. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, we have the very best methylene blue I've ever had at the lowest price and it funds the Infowar, a total 360 win. |