All Episodes
April 8, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:36:53
The American Journal: China Vows To ‘Fight To The End’ Over Trump Tariffs, Accuses US Of Economic ‘Blackmail’ - FULL SHOW - 04/08/2025
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:58:21
j
jeremy brown
14:57
Appearances
a
adam schiff
02:02
a
alex jones
02:08
c
calley means
01:54
c
charlie kirk
01:54
Clips
a
anthony fauci
00:07
l
larry fink
00:13
m
mehmet oz
00:08
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
anthony fauci
The next outbreak will be of a respiratory disease that's easily transmissible that has a significant degree of morbidity.
unidentified
And we are making this a little bit more dangerous with the cuts and our attitude towards science?
Oh, absolutely.
Worst day for our economy since COVID.
Just a little reminder, this time, he's the disease.
alex jones
COVID hurt the economy last time.
This time, Trump's the disease.
They always say COVID cause you'll...
Tens of millions extra a year to starve to death during the lockdowns.
No, the lockdowns did it.
The policies did it.
That's the image.
They used COVID to lock everything down and blow the economy last time and stop Trump's economic program.
mehmet oz
The state of California has taken tens of millions of dollars from the federal government providing free health insurance for illegal immigrants in California.
unidentified
We're going to get that money back.
Someone came to you, someone came to me in person and said, I...
I basically am a PR agency, a very high echelon one.
And I was approached by a government agency to create a narrative against you, and it's going to be called your anti-vaccine.
And I turned down the job, but I wanted to privately and secretly...
We couldn't do an email, we couldn't do a phone call.
I had to come to you in person and let you know this, that they're going to come after you and hard.
And I said...
Well, how are they going to do that when I've clearly said in every interview I'm not anti-vaccine?
Like, I'm just telling the story of my child, of what happened and how I'm getting him better.
And they said, doesn't matter.
He said, doesn't matter.
They're going to come after you with everything they've got and they've, you know, they've got the media on their side.
alex jones
They're doing it again.
Crashing the markets with their put options, with their panicking, with, oh my God, this is the worst thing ever.
We're all doomed.
And then you look at the actual graph, how much it's fallen, it's nothing.
unidentified
What do you say to people in the public who are concerned now about drug safety, about whether we're prepared for the next pandemic when these cuts have happened so hard so fast?
calley means
Yeah, I'd say to the reporters in the room and the lobbyists in the room, I mean, obviously make your case, but I'd truly ask for, as you're making it, a little bit of humility about what the voters were trying to say by putting...
Bobby Kennedy Jr. in this position of power.
The NIH oversaw, and this is just consensus at this point, the creation, the literal creation of a pandemic.
The NIH, whose goal is to promote American health, has overseen a devastation, just an abject devastation in American health over the past 20 years, with disease rates skyrocketing in America, leading the world of almost every single chronic disease, with rates of nearly every single chronic disease being at an all-time high among kids.
Absolutely. Like the idea that Bobby Kennedy should not come in and make dramatic changes to the leadership and the personnel at these authorities that have overseen an abject devastation of American health, which the lobbyists in this room do not have the humility to admit that we have gone completely wrong.
The lobbyists in this room laughing when we have the sickest children in the developed world.
unidentified
If you guys, if that is your attitude.
calley means
And your attitude is to tell the maha moms that their votes and their voice is not legitimate, that we need dramatic changes to American healthcare.
If you think it is illegitimate for Bobby Kennedy to not make big changes to people like Peter Marks, who once again and again and again went against FDA advisory opinions, who fired the two top vaccine makers, the two top vaccine scientists at the FDA for suggesting that we shouldn't mandate COVID shots for soldiers, Continually went against expert opinion in favor of the pharmaceutical industry, who many people here were collaborating with him with.
The fact that somebody like that can't be fired and he can't install tremendous people like Marty Makary and Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Oz to start reforming these agencies and put in their people, of course he should do that.
That's what people voted for.
alex jones
Most people are now awake, the vast majority, but they're just woke up.
So they're trying to get their bearings.
And I've also seen, because the leftist corporate Hollywood-style brainwashing and attacks are working on less and less people, now the system is going at it from trying to finance supposed anti-globalist opposition to then go around and try to demoralize people and say Trump's not for real and we're basically all doomed.
That's the new official point.
remind you of the COVID tyranny and then place it all on Trump's feet right at his doorstep as I've been warning him and others that they would do.
unidentified
It's Tuesday, April 8th in the of our Lord 2025.
You're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
I think it's time to blow this thing back, get everybody in the stuff together.
harrison smith
Okay, three, two, one, let's jam.
Stand by, ladies and gentlemen.
The show will begin shortly.
unidentified
Feeling some technical issues here behind the scenes.
harrison smith
It's one of those days.
All right, welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live belatedly here this Tuesday morning from the InfoWars headquarters here in Austin, Texas.
We have a lot to talk about today.
Continuing fallout of the tariffs, considering that we are one day away from their implementation, April 9th.
China making big moves.
Europe making some very generous offers, those offers being roundly rejected by Donald Trump.
It's all very exciting.
We have a meeting between Trump and Netanyahu that ended it yesterday, as well as just a ton of videos to show you about the cultural conflicts around the world.
We just have a lot to talk about today.
And I'm excited to take your phone calls as well.
But we'll begin today talking about the tariffs.
We'll do the Daily Dispatch in just a second.
But it seems like they're already just making absolutely everything better.
For example, China to ban Hollywood films in retaliation for Trump tariffs.
That's a $500 million in U.S. box office at risk.
Good. Yeah, I know.
You might be thinking, well, wait, isn't that a bad thing?
Doesn't that mean that the American movie industry will...
You know, massively suffer?
The answer is yes.
I'm sorry, the answer is no and yes.
The answer is no, this isn't a bad thing.
Yes, it is going to destroy the movie industry.
Yeah, no, they deserve it, actually.
And maybe now we won't have movies that are tailor-made for a communistic Chinese audience.
Wouldn't that be nice?
Wouldn't that be something?
Beijing is preparing to ban all American movies in response to Trump's sweeping tariffs, calling US policy blackmail and vowing to fight to the end in an escalating trade war.
Frankly, I'm surprised they didn't do it earlier.
I would have done it earlier if I was China.
The move threatens to wipe out over $500 million in annual US box office revenue from China.
Blockbusters like Jurassic World Rebirth, Mission Impossible, and The Accountant 2 are now at risk of losing access to the world's second largest film market.
Not The Accountant 2!
Oh my god, what will America do if The Accountant 2 doesn't turn a profit?
Whatever will we do?
Maybe Hollywood will actually have to start making movies that people want to watch again.
Wouldn't that be something?
I'm telling you, folks, the world is healing, and it's amazing to see.
China's retaliatory plan includes a 34% tariffs on U.S. goods, a total ban on U.S. poultry imports, new restrictions for soybean and agriculture.
The Chinese foreign ministry says tariff wars have no winners.
Pressure, threats, and blackmail are not the right way to deal with China.
Trump has threatened to raise tariffs on Chinese imports to 104% by April 9th if Beijing doesn't withdraw its new levies.
The source being from the...
The Daily Mail.
I'm telling you folks, it's just, we've been living in a delusion for too long.
For too long, the form and function of capitalism has been hijacked and warped and twisted and manipulated, and it's at this point so far off the mark that it's unrecognizable.
In other words, You're supposed to make movies that people want to watch because the point of making movies is to make money with those movies.
And if people want to watch your movie, they buy the ticket and that makes you money.
So you're incentivized to make good movies that people want to watch.
If I'm going too fast for you, tell me to slow down.
I know the socialists out there, they think capitalism is evil.
So I know this can be very confusing.
Make good thing, people give money for thing.
That's the way capitalism works.
And it's a self-correcting sort of system.
If somebody's making something that nobody wants, it should go away.
Now we're in this system where, like in Hollywood, they haven't made a good movie in 15 years.
And that's just being generous.
They haven't made something that people want to watch in a very long time.
And in fact, they seem to be doing absolutely everything they possibly can to drive people away from their projects.
Now that type of mentality can only exist for so long.
Or it can only exist in a system that is entirely, completely controlled, manufactured, and fake.
So that's the system that's being destroyed.
The fake system.
The system of unreality.
The system in which infinite money is poured into programs that nobody actually likes and actually make everything worse.
And we're just going to get back to some sense of normalcy.
Maybe American movies will have American ideals in them.
Maybe we can actually here's a crazy idea make new movies.
Make new movies.
We need to go through it again because it's only gotten worse but a couple years ago I did a report for InfoWars and it was it must have been the Oscars or something or some big award show and I was just going through the list of movies And it got a little bit ridiculous, folks. It was like you would have a movie that was a sequel to a remake to an adaption to an adaption.
It's so bad at this point.
It's hard to even explain.
I just saw a poster for Liam Neeson in Naked Gun.
Can we not come up with a slapstick comedy movie?
Do we really need to continue to plunder cultural heritage for, like, B comedy movies in the 80s?
Is that how far we've fallen?
Is that how far down we've gone?
Now, I'll say, Airplane might be...
It's not my favorite movie, but it's probably the movie I've seen more than any other movie in my life.
Airplane. It's an amazing movie.
God forbid they try to remake Airplane in 2025.
Just make up a new movie.
The plots are not hard.
What is the plot of Naked Gun?
It's a cop?
Like, literally, just give it any other title.
It's just, the age of cultural bankruptcy has to end.
It's been limping along, propped up, inflated, for far too long.
And it's time to be done with it.
Guys, if I could get some stories, I'd love to do the Daily Dispatch, but we'll continue with other things that are correcting themselves due to these tariffs.
Apple ships production to India to dodge 54% China tariffs.
Apple is ramping up iPhone imports from India to soften the blow from Trump's new tariffs, which hit Chinese-made goods with a 54% rate double the 26% applied to Indian imports.
Guys, I have this idea.
I have this brilliant idea.
What we'll do is we'll have all of the Indians stay in India and they can be employed there instead of coming to America as H-1B visas.
Instead of using slave labor and zero environmental restrictions in China, Apple can take a little hit off the top and pay people living wages.
I think it would work incredibly well.
And I just, I also want to open everybody's mind up to the reality that the modern consumer habits when it comes to phones are not how it needs to be.
We sort of assume it's almost like just understood.
That you need to get a new phone every year.
New phone every single year from the same company.
The same phone, slightly upgraded, every single year.
This was designed on purpose by Steve Jobs to maximize profits and what you end up with is a system of consumption That you could not have designed to be worse for everybody in terms of,
like, the production that's necessary, requiring slave labor to even be profitable, the pollution that it creates.
I mean, there is no reason why you should have to get a new phone every year, but that's what people have been programmed into, and that's the way that our phone system has...
Been designed to operate.
There's absolutely no reason why that should be the case.
It's only the case because Steve Jobs decided that was the way to maximize profits.
And he did this forever.
At one point, we should just go through Steve Jobs' biography.
I honestly don't know what to make of him.
Part of me still just sort of admires the guy just as being an icon, as being a real American.
As being a champion of capitalism, and a revolutionary, and changing the entire world, not necessarily for the better, but certainly his influence is undeniable.
At the same time, when you hear about the way that he deliberately designed his products to do things like, you know, the whole thing with PCs in the beginning was, these were things people built in their garages, and everything was swappable, and you could upgrade everything, and it was all very like...
It's like a hobby more so than a serious industry.
And it was Steve Jobs who had to fight all the people in his company to be like, no, everything needs to be proprietary.
Everything needs to be locked in so they need to get a whole new computer if they want to replace one little thing.
Same reason why iPods were probably the first widespread consumer electronic to not have a removable battery.
Because to Apple, it was all about removing the ability of the consumer to have an impact on the product.
And it sort of paved the way for what we're seeing now, which is you don't really own anything.
You don't own your car.
Things like luxury car companies.
I think Mercedes did it where you have to pay a subscription to get access to your heated seats.
Like the technology is there, it's built in, but you can't use it until you pay them to allow them to pay.
The point being that this was never necessary.
The whole system has been set up to maximize profit for a very few and has been created almost in a way that could not be designed more exploitatively or disastrously when it comes to just nature itself.
Human interaction.
So, I want to see China not be the place where we make absolutely everything constantly.
Automakers like BMW, GM, and Mercedes charge monthly fees for faster speeds, heated seats, and more.
Yeah, this is the thing.
It's, again, not necessary.
The whole idea of, you know, designed obsolescence that Apple really championed and was on the forefront of.
If these people who are telling us to eat bugs and telling us that we're not allowed to drive cars or fly in planes anymore, they really cared about the environment, maybe the number one thing they could do,
well, the one thing they could do would be to go to war with China over the fishing fleets, but right up there in the list would be to end planned obsolescence and instead have people Create things that actually last a lifetime, but that's not how you create infinite growth in continual profit.
So things are just being set right.
These tariffs are long, long overdue.
And even just some of the secondary effects that are already happening are going to have major positive reverberations.
Movies are going to have to start catering to Americans again.
We're not going to be able to utilize brutal, Suicide net slave labor in China.
And all of the Indians will have jobs in India.
And won't have to hire each other here.
It's all very amazing.
The printer has been fixed.
There were some technical...
Everything's going wrong today.
But that's okay.
Because we have the systems and the systemic flexibility to deal with it.
but we will begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks.
Your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 8th of April, 2025.
Supreme Court allows Trump to enforce Alien Enemies Act for rapid deportations for now.
The Supreme Court on Monday allowed President Donald Trump to enforce the Alien Enemies Act for now, handing the White House a significant victory that will let immigration officials rely on sweeping wartime authority to rapidly deport alleged gang members.
the unsigned decision in the court one of the most closely watched emergency appeals pending in the Supreme Court lets Trump invoke the 1798 law to speed removals while litigation over the acts use plays out in lower courts the court stressed that going forward people who are
deported should receive notice they are subject to the act and an opportunity to have their removal reviewed by the federal court where they're being detained the court's three liberal justices dissented from the decision and justice amy comey barrett a member of the court's conservative wing partially dissented being yet another disappointment From Trump's first administration, but that's fine.
Supreme Court's upheld the rule of law of our nation by allowing the president, whoever that may be, to be able to secure a border and protect our families and the country itself.
That's what Trump wrote in a Truth Social post.
So yeah, that's very good, and hopefully we'll see rapid and expanding use of that power to clear out the illegal immigrants.
Meanwhile... Major story here.
Florida sting operation finds heinous international child sex ring with over a million videos, including babies.
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeyer announced on Monday that a truly heinous child pornography ring was found during a police sting operation resulting in the arrest of eight people.
The intentional international ring involved a website that led investigators to locating one million child sex abuse videos with some infant victims.
Special Counsel Rita Peters, who's leading the prosecution efforts in the matter, said many of the children in the photos and videos are found in the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
The subjects are being charged with multiple felony counts, including RICO, money laundering, and the purchase of child pornography.
Absolutely horrific.
The leader of the ring was a man living in Turkey named Medmat Bozyuk.
The Florida Department of Law Enforcement is working with Homeland Security to extradite that ringleader.
Uthmeyer pointed out the Chinese social media app TikTok was allegedly used by the monstrous criminals to procure the images and videos, saying it's crucial that the company be held more accountable.
Which I would agree with with all social media.
Tell you what, if you could stop fact-checking people's personal observations or personal experiences about things like vaccines, instead go after the inordinate amount of child sex abuse material on your platforms, I think we'd all be a little bit happier.
Meanwhile, this story.
China is not backing down from Trump's tariff.
...war, what next?
The trade war between the world's two biggest economies shows no signs of slowing down.
Beijing has vowed to fight to the end hours after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to nearly double tariffs on China.
That would leave most Chinese imports facing a staggering 104% tax, a sharp escalation between the two sides.
Smartphones, computers, lithium-ion batteries, toys and video game consoles make up the bulk of Chinese exports to the U.S., but there are many other things from screws to boilers.
with the deadline looming in Washington as Trump threatens to introduce the additional tariffs from Wednesday.
Who will blink first?
I think it's a mistake to think that China will back off and removes tariffs unilaterally, says Alfredo something.
A special advisor to the Chinese Center of the Conference Board think tank.
Not only will it make China look weak, it would also give leverage to the U.S.
to ask for more.
We've now reached an impasse that will likely lead to long term.
China hit back with tit-for-tat levies, 34%, and Trump warned that he would retaliate with an additional 50% tariff if Beijing doesn't back down.
Again, we'll get more into the tariffs later in the show.
But again, I mean, I can't say it enough.
I mean, Trump is upending a century-old economic and political geopolitical world order that was designed from the outset with the intention of screwing America over and benefiting countries like Mexico and China.
And it was always that way.
That was always the case.
We'll show you videos from back in 1992 of Ross Perot making this exact prediction.
And, of course, everything he said came absolutely true.
And we're in another situation like COVID or any number of other Nobody knew what was really going on.
We were all working off the best information we had, and the experts were making the best decisions they could.
And yet somehow, somehow at that same time, you had dissident voices, often silenced and censored, expressing exactly what the truth was.
Somehow, some people knew.
It's just the experts and all the people in charge and all the people implementing these things had no idea how bad they were going to be.
But of course they did, because that was the point the entire time.
Again, if you want to know what it takes to be a conspiracy theorist, simply to understand that things don't just happen.
The factories didn't just get up and leave one day.
All the factory workers didn't just decide that all of a sudden they no longer wanted to have union jobs with healthcare.
And they would all just become addicted to painkillers.
These things are policies that are pursued with the intention of their outcome.
The outcome being the dispossession of the American people, the destruction of Western society, and the consolidation of international authority in the hands of unelected banking elite.
So we'll get back into that.
And Trump is destroying all of that, like Alexander slicing through the Gordian Knot.
He is ending it all in one massive and powerful show of strength.
Meanwhile, Colossal Biosciences says it revived the long extinct dire wolf.
Wolf. Wolof.
But they didn't really.
They actually didn't.
So, no need to worry about that.
This is not so much a story about cloning or reviving an extinct species as it is about DNA and genetic manipulation.
Using things like CRISPR.
colossal biosciences the texas company attempting to bring back extinct animals announced monday the revival of a once long gone dire wolf our team took dna from 13 000 year old tooth and 72 000 year old skull and made healthy dire wolf puppies colossal ceo ben lamb said in a press release the company's based in dallas with some employees in austin
The wolves, thought to be extinct for 12,500 years, were as much as 20% larger, 25% larger than gray wolves and had a slightly wider head, thick fur and a stronger jaw.
So what's actually happening is they...
Basically took some of the DNA of the dire wolves and spliced it into gray wolf DNA and are now saying they have these dire wolf puppies, which again is pretty cool.
Pretty cool.
I for one would like to see megafauna returning to wreck a glorious vengeance against their human usurpers, but this is just not really what's happening here.
Instead, what is happening here is that they're normalizing genetic manipulation.
To design living beings to be something in between natural and inorganic in a very dangerous forewarning for the world ahead.
And yes, Joe Rogan did a big interview about this where he learned to his shocked amazement that human beings had already been genetically manipulated and I think this Technological Ray should have probably as much attention as AI does.
But we can get back into the dangers and potentialities there.
Finally, Netanyahu to depart U.S. for Israel Tuesday after disappointing visit.
We'll get into that visit and where the disappointment comes from on the other side.
Stay with us.
It's the American Journal.
Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison to support us.
We'll be right back.
Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal.
Boy, do we have a lot to talk about.
A lot of politics.
Not just the tariffs, but Donald Trump just put forward a trillion dollar military budget.
We'll want to talk about that.
We'll want to talk about what's going on in Europe as well.
And all of, as far as I can tell, All the bad guys are very unhappy these days.
Which is a good thing.
And you know, I guess things sort of go in waves.
It's sort of a rollercoaster.
The information war rollercoaster.
But I was thinking back to an old liner.
I don't know if Alex still uses it or not.
I haven't heard it in a while.
But it used to be one of his regular ones.
Where he'd say, Patriots are on the march, the Empire is on the run.
And that really is how it feels right now.
It feels right now like the tables have turned, the rebels have claimed the Death Star, and now it's the Empire and all of their stormtroopers that are running around frantically trying to escape or trying to cobble together what little remains of their once powerful edifice.
And it really is an amazing, miraculous, and revolutionary thing that we've been able to pull off.
Not InfoWars, but when I say we, I'm including everybody listening to me right now.
The awakening that we've been able to foster and encourage has changed history forever.
And it's amazing to see this, no matter how it all turns out.
Fact is, they wanted a fight and they got one.
So, it really is astonishing.
And I'll show you some videos.
Even just...
We'll just start...
We'll just start with some of these guys.
For one thing, we'll get into what the actual talk was about and what they decided here.
But BB Netanyahu, clip number 7, not looking very happy.
Let's watch.
unidentified
We're having direct talks with Iran.
If only you knew how bad things really were.
He doesn't want Trump talking directly to Iran.
harrison smith
Israel has pulled off some amazing things to stop America from talking to Iran.
Now we're talking directly to Iran.
Bibi Netanyahu is giving us reaction gifs of sadness.
Disappointment. Twitty confusion.
He's very sad.
He's not the only one, though.
Let's go to clip number two here.
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink.
Very worried.
And again, we'll do some body language analysis here as we watch Larry Fink.
Happy, optimistic guy.
Worried, pessimistic, disturbed and anxious guy.
Let's watch.
unidentified
One of those narratives is from President Trump himself.
He says that the tariffs he rolled out last Wednesday in the Rose Garden will create an economic renaissance and make America wealthy like never before.
harrison smith
Now remember, if you make it to a position like CEO of BlackRock, aka de facto shadow ruler of the world, you have an extremely high ability to...
unidentified
A lot poorer.
harrison smith
Disguise your emotions.
So just keep that in mind.
unidentified
It's probably something in between, but as a market participant, I'm more in the market narrative.
So let's be clear.
In the United States right now, 8% of workers are in manufacturing.
8%?
8. 8. So how much more should it be?
16%?
I don't know, but it's not, I don't think, you know.
I looked up what the new entry level of automotive worker is today.
It's about $25 an hour.
$25 to $28 an hour.
That's not a great job versus today.
larry fink
And Brad Smith, the president of Microsoft, talked about this last Monday, stating that we're going to have a shortage as large as 500,000 electricians in this country.
unidentified
Amazing. Electricians today are paid over $150,000 a year, especially as the advanced electricians are doing AI and all that.
So we're going to open up half a million high-paying six-digit jobs instead of this whole reordering.
And so I believe the markets, I've always believed in the markets, and I believe the markets are telling you the real story.
harrison smith
He's stuttering.
unidentified
He's sweaty.
He's twitchy.
Have you ever seen the BlackRock CEO look so out of his depth?
What is he even saying?
harrison smith
He's just rambling and scrambling and trying to make a point.
unidentified
Let me step back and respond to another statement you said.
Let me just reiterate, 75% of the global capital markets rested here in the United States.
I would say that means the United States is fabulously successful when you have that.
That being said, and I wrote this in my CEO letter that came out a week ago today, the biggest issue we have in capitalism, the biggest difference that we have today is we have not seen a broadening of the economy.
harrison smith
Well, great point, Larry.
I mean, have you ever seen...
Larry Fink panic more.
Now again, he's not, oh god, oh gee, but it's because he's like a psychopath, right?
I mean, it takes a lot to break the appearance of calm with Larry Fink.
But I think I see cracks there.
I think I see cracks.
Now, I'm not even sure what point he was making there.
He's like, 8% of American wealth is in manufacturing.
Gee, what should it be?
Should it be 16?
I don't know.
Oh, gee, you seem to know everything else.
You seem to be perfectly willing to impose what you think the world's composition should be by fiat, by assertion, without the will of the people ever considered.
In fact, Larry Fink has been pretty open about the fact that he sees the will of the people as a barrier to be overcome or destroyed.
To force people to change their behaviors.
Strange he never forced people to change behaviors in a way that benefited America, benefited Americans.
He's happy to deploy the inordinate wealth and power that he has through his control of money markets.
To force American companies to create high-paying manufacturing jobs here in the United States.
No, he will make your sports team gay.
He will force your local target to manhandle you if you aren't wearing a mask.
He's perfectly willing to use his inordinate power and authority, in my opinion, illegally or at least immorally.
accrued to himself he's happy to use that power to destroy the united states and eliminate jobs and he knows everything there is to know about the market he's the authority and the expert when it comes to offshoring jobs and forcing companies to comply to absurd dei rules When it comes to manufacturing, he's like, I mean, 8%, 16%.
I mean, we don't know what's going to happen.
I looked up the rate of the average auto manufacturer.
$25 an hour.
That's pretty good.
That's really not bad, especially if you're in a place where there are factories for building cars.
You know, they don't have automotive plants in New York City or L.A. Where $25 is what you pay for avocado toast.
Typically, car manufacturing plants are in small towns or outside of big cities where $25 an hour is a pretty damn good wage.
That's what architects are paid when they get out of school for their first job.
After having to go through one of the most rigorous academic gauntlets ever, they get paid about the same as manual workers.
Assembling automobiles on an assembly line.
So, yeah, we need more of those jobs.
That's a good thing.
Again, Larry Fink is like, in his interpretation of the world, 8% is too high.
America shouldn't be manufacturing anything.
8% of our economy is manufacturing things rather than sending emails and having meetings.
Well, that's too high.
Let's try to get that down to 5%.
We want all manufacturing to take place.
In our overpopulated, environmentally disastrous wage slave places.
And America will just be endless TikTokers and email jobs.
He says there's going to be a shortage of 500,000 electrical engineers.
Jobs that pay upwards of $150,000 a year.
Again, what is the...
Problem here.
What is the issue?
That means that there's now half a million openings for high-paying technical industry jobs.
What is he complaining about?
Well, he's complaining about the fact that the world is slipping through his fingers.
Of their highly orchestrated, long established control of the world is...
Being taken from them.
And America's actually doing things that benefit America.
And that's never been his agenda.
So again, we could find more examples, but you just go through a list of the bad guys and all of their latest videos.
Literally, they're sweating, they're twitching, they don't know what's going on anymore, they've sort of lost that gravitas, that...
Confidence of we're in control.
We set the playbook and everybody else dances to our tune.
That sort of attitude is not quite as convincing these days.
And that's because Trump is taking a sledgehammer to their entire corrupted facade of control.
And it's a beautiful, beautiful thing.
And we'll get more into that later.
I want to take a minute now to play a video.
And I've seen this video a lot on YouTube ads.
It's a Charlie Kirk video where he's talking to a college student.
We've played a few of these videos before.
And I'd never seen more than a few seconds of this video.
I finally decided to actually watch the whole thing.
And we'll pause it and play it.
But I think it's important to illustrate the mindset of the left right now.
As they debate the January 6th pardons, there's a lot...
Going on under the surface here.
And there's a lot we can discern from the mindsets of both sides involved in this conversation.
Going on to clip number six, and we'll pause and play it because there are a few points of interest in this video.
It's Charlie Kirk on a college campus debating with a leftist.
Let's watch.
charlie kirk
Yes or no?
Yes or no?
Answer. Yes or no?
Okay. So you say yes.
Got it.
Everyone should be pardoned.
unidentified
Okay, here is my thing to say about that.
My father is a police officer.
So if you're saying that someone injures him or kills him in the line of duty, I should support pardoning them?
harrison smith
Actually, let's pause it right there.
Because this is how it starts.
This is a great little, you know, intro to this.
So they're talking about pardoning the January Sixers.
This woman says, my dad is a police officer.
So if somebody kills or attacks my dad, they should be pardoned.
So this is taking a singular, totally unique and unexpected and unparalleled event in American history, somehow extrapolating that out and saying that if you think that the January Sixers should be pardoned, somehow, through some sort of algorithmic transfer, That means that you think police officers should be attacked, and that's okay.
So that's absurd on the face of it, even if we went with the lie of January 6th.
Even if everything they lied about January 6th was true, this would still be a totally nonsensical and frankly stupid argument.
But the twist, the kicker of it all, is that no cops died on January 6th.
Now, Merrick Garland and others routinely and up until 2025 continually lied about this and said five police officers died that day and it never happened so to understand like where the liberal mindset goes wrong understand that first they're operating off of an unreality where they cannot contend with just what is real and they have to extrapolate everything out to some supposed interpretation of
what you're saying in the worst possible light to argue with a straw man.
And they do this with everything.
They do this with absolutely everything.
Go ahead.
unidentified
She also employed another rhetorical trick where it's not just police officers getting attacked, it's her dad.
harrison smith
It's her dad, yes.
unidentified
You think my dad should be attacked?
harrison smith
Right. So therefore, if you say the January 6th should be pardoned, you're telling this girl that you want her dad to die, right?
That's what's going on in their mind.
They're psychotics.
The point of this video is that we're dealing with psychotic people.
Psychopathic people who cannot and I don't understand but like they physically cannot understand the world around them and whether that's because they deliberately like purposefully choose to misunderstand the world around them or whether it is just a biological malfunction.
Yeah it could be a rules for radicals thing but I don't think I think these people genuinely Don't understand.
And again, this happens with everything where you go, hey, I don't want my daughter losing her scholarship because a boy decided he was a girl and ran against her.
And they extrapolate that to, oh, so you think transgender people don't exist and therefore should be killed.
You support transgenocide.
They do this with everything.
You go, hey, it looks like there's a very high crime rate in the black community.
And they're like, oh, so you think that blacks are subhuman?
And should be slaves again.
And it's like, how are you supposed to talk about anything when these people are so hysterically incapable of having even normal conversation?
So we're like three seconds in this video.
We're going to watch the whole thing.
But this is the level of interpretation that you can deliver on these types of videos.
Because we've got two different things.
We've got the extrapolation of just a simple fact out to be the worst possible You know, least generous interpretation of what's being said.
Like, just total fantasy of what's actually being said, right?
Yeah, I don't think we should kill babies in the womb.
I think that's a living human being and I don't think it should be killed before it has a chance to be born.
Oh, wow, so you think women should be chained to the bed and forced to deliver babies against their will?
It's like, what are we doing here?
Like, how are we supposed to interact with these people?
But that's just the one thing.
The second thing is that they're operating off of just entirely false information.
Not misconstrued, not misinterpreted, entirely false information.
When they say five cops died on January 6th, that's not a twisting of the truth.
That's not a, well, some of them died after, but it wasn't quite what they, no, no, no.
It is wholesale manufactured a lie.
It is just a lie.
Okay, so these two things work in tandem.
They're very complimentary when you're operating off of a lie in the first place.
And then even if you can be wrestled into acknowledging extrapolating that reality out to just fulfill your, you know, preordained assumption that the person you're talking to is somehow evil.
And so, therefore, all of their beliefs have to be informed by some deep-seated hatred or ignorance of, you know, Hey, before we get started, I just decided to hit factcheck.org just to see what they were saying.
unidentified
Because, you know, of course, right?
And it says that a couple of stroke victims, or two heart attacks for the Trump supporters, right, on January 6th.
And then you get down to law enforcement.
And it says, stroke victim.
Okay, so Chalk went up for stroke for Brian Sicknick, and then they didn't die on January 6th.
Right, right, right.
And then they have now changed those other deaths to four suicides.
So January 6th was the definitive reason why four police officers decided to commit suicide.
harrison smith
And again, even if that was true...
It doesn't mean that they were killed on January 6th.
Again, it's just a complete...
unidentified
How do they attribute those deaths to January 6th?
It's just at factcheck.org.
Let's take the org out of that.
harrison smith
Because they're liars.
Because they're just relentless, shameless liars.
It's not complicated.
It's not nuanced.
They just lie.
They're just liars.
So some cop shot himself in the head on January 10th and they're like, see?
January Sixers killed a cop.
Absurd. It's absurd.
So this is the basis upon which these psychopaths are operating.
So again, you've got two different things going on.
You've got the lie they're operating off of, and you've got the fact that they're insane idiots in the first place.
So even if they were just the insane idiots that they are, operating entirely off fact, it would still be an issue.
It's compounded and multiplied by the fact that what they're operating on are lies deliberately told to them, designed to Let's go back to the video of Charlie Kirk and this cop's daughter.
charlie kirk
Let's watch.
And here's the kicker, that the January 6th defendants were put in pretrial detention for nearly two years, many of whom were not given attorney representation.
One attorney in particular made his defendant go watch videos saying that MAGA is brainwashing you and say, go un-brainwash yourself before the trial.
A complete violation of the 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendment.
What I'm getting at, though, is that if you have, would you agree with the premise that if the tree is rotten, the fruit will be rotten?
unidentified
I don't even know what you're referring to.
charlie kirk
It's a metaphor.
harrison smith
She's like, I don't even understand metaphors, okay?
I don't even have the ability to understand when things represent other things, okay?
I'm like a dog or a cat, okay?
I can't envision things that aren't real.
I have no imagination or...
You know, basic comprehension of the world around me.
Metaphors? Dude, are you mocking me?
unidentified
Hey, Mr. Potato Head, didn't you hear me say my dad could be attacked?
harrison smith
My dad could be attacked, okay?
And I did eat breakfast this morning, so your question doesn't make any sense.
Was that too vague?
Do people understand what that means?
There's a simple test.
Ask somebody if they ate breakfast this morning and then ask them how they would feel if their answer was different.
And some people cannot comprehend that question.
That's the type of person we're dealing with here.
Charlie Kirk's like, would you agree that you can tell a tree by its fruits?
And she's like, what tree?
I don't see a tree.
We're talking about January 6th.
He's like, no, I'm saying like...
It's a metaphor.
She's just like, okay, but there is no tree and there is no fruit.
Stop trying to change the subject.
We're dealing with people who don't quite have the mental capacity to deal with these high intellectual concepts like metaphor and allegory.
This is talking to, well, I was about to say something very insulting to children.
Children understand metaphors.
I don't know what we're dealing with here.
Let's go back as she struggles to She actually doesn't even struggle to contend with the metaphor.
She just gets mad that Charlie Kirk is deploying a metaphor.
So, you know.
Trying to show a dog algebra.
I mean, they just get mad.
Let's go back to the cop's daughter.
charlie kirk
It's a metaphor.
unidentified
No, my turn.
So, I want to know.
I want to know.
In your opinion, is that right or wrong?
Yes or no?
charlie kirk
Well, it depends.
unidentified
Yes or no?
charlie kirk
Peacefully storming the couch.
harrison smith
Let me pause this here.
She actually does a good job here.
Credit to her because Charlie Kirk in the beginning is doing this to her.
He's going yes or no, yes or no, yes or no.
It's a yes or no answer.
And she responds with her answer.
Now she flips it on him, asks him a yes or no question and does it to him, yes or no, yes or no.
And she sort of gets Charlie Kirk here.
The way that Charlie Kirk could have gotten the best of this interaction is to say yes.
Now he sort of, he sort of, he said, well, well, no, it's not a yes, but it's like, we're, you're dealing with the person that you're dealing with.
I mean, you're dealing with the person that we're seeing that is saying the things that she's saying.
So, just understand, like, she doesn't have the capacity for nuance.
Just say yes.
Just say yes.
She's like, so you think that it was good they were storming the Capitol?
Hey lady, yeah, I do.
I wish it had been more intense.
I wish it had been all the things that you said it was.
I wish it really was an insurrection.
I wish they really were trying to overthrow the U.S. government.
I think we could have saved ourselves four years of pain and tens of millions of illegal immigrants crossing the border.
unidentified
So yeah, January 6th is a very good thing.
harrison smith
We'll return to this on the other side because there's more to come.
unidentified
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
Let's continue with this Charlie Kirk clip that I think is the real point of showing you this clip.
And it'll come up in just a second.
But let's go back.
And, again, my criticism of Charlie Kirk here is – Don't shy away from saying things like January 6th was a good thing.
I mean, you can't give these people any...
Any ground.
You can't give them the satisfaction of thinking that they got you on something or like being tepid or lukewarm in your support of your fellow Americans.
Like you gotta just be fearless in this.
So again, a little criticism of Charlie Kirk where he waffles or he doesn't just outright say yes.
He does eventually, but he needs a little more confidence in it.
Let's go back to Charlie Kirk.
unidentified
Yes or no?
Do you agree that is a good thing that they did or a bad thing?
charlie kirk
Can I?
unidentified
Yes or no?
charlie kirk
Can I?
unidentified
You can answer yes or no.
charlie kirk
Yes, and I'm answering it.
Yes, because not everybody did that.
So, for example, Siakamasaquai took three feet into the Capitol, said a prayer and went out.
Do you agree he should be hunted down by federal officials for three years and face 10 years in federal prison?
Yes or no?
Yes or no?
Answer. Yes or no?
Okay. So you say yes.
harrison smith
Got it.
That's it.
That's the point of this clip, right?
Charlie Kirk does a great job of laying out that it doesn't even matter what these people did.
Their constitutional rights were egregiously and deliberately violated.
And for that reason alone, not only should the people, people or the nonviolent people be released, but the violent people need to be pardoned as well as a message to the justice system as Charlie Kirk gets into in just a second.
We'll continue watching it.
unidentified
But the point is that she's a Nazi.
harrison smith
That she's a Nazi, right?
That she's telling the truth when she answers this question.
Charlie Kirk asks, here's this person, sounds like a foreign name, but it doesn't matter.
Here's a person who their crime was to walk three feet into the Capitol, say a prayer, and walk out.
Says, does that person deserve to be hunted down by federal police and imprisoned for 10 years and without hesitation?
That woman says yes.
That is the truth.
That is actually what they believe.
It does not matter to them that the punishment fit the crime.
The crime that that person's committing, to us, we'd say, well, that's like the minorest of trespasses.
Right? Because we're looking at like, okay, morally, what happened?
Physically, what laws were broken?
That's not what's happening to the leftist.
In the leftist minds, that person committed a blasphemy against The state god, right?
And they deserve to die.
They deserve to be taken away from their friends and family for 10 years.
They have no sympathy, no empathy.
They have no concern or fellow feeling with their fellow human beings.
They are vicious, tyrannical psychos that will justify any level of state oppression against their enemies.
Do not underestimate how psychotic these people truly are.
Nothing they believe is based off of reality.
They seem incapable of even contending with reality when it's laid out in front of them.
And they are proud of the fact that they would send a father to jail for 10 years despite the fact that he committed no crimes and hurt nobody.
They don't care.
They don't care.
So we should be lucky.
We should be thankful that our enemies are so honest.
charlie kirk
So, but however, I think what happened on January 6th, there was a lot of stuff I don't support.
However, they were treated so terribly by our own government as political prisoners.
Here is the truth.
Even if you go do something as evil as shooting...
You deserve 5th, 6th, and 7th Amendment protection rights.
These January 6th defendants did not get their basic constitutional rights protected.
They literally had to sleep on the ground of the D.C. jail as January 6th gulags.
You look at these pictures, they had to go sleep on the floor with no food for days, acting as if that this was some sort of Moscow internment camp.
And again, she loved it.
This was a statement towards the justice system.
harrison smith
If she was really, really honest, she would say, not only should they sleep on the floor, they should be buried under it.
That's what you get.
All right, welcome back, folks.
second hour of American Journal is on We just have so much to talk about.
unidentified
I want to go and open up the phone lines.
harrison smith
Maybe I'll wait to open up the phone lines for another segment or two because I don't want to keep people waiting.
But I do want to take your calls about what we should be talking about.
We could talk about the tariffs.
We will.
I mean, there's a lot to discuss in that regard.
There's also this dire wolf thing.
I want to get into and talk about the destruction of DNA.
I feel like this might sound crazy, but we almost need like a spiritual...
How do I even put this?
Basically, if you treat DNA as sacred, Beyond logic, beyond reason, something that just should be revered, I think you can actually apply it to a lot of things.
I think this even involves the abortion conversation.
Because to me, that goes right to the heart of the abortion conversation is that you can remove genetic material, you can remove material...from a fetus in a mother's belly, and it's a different DNA sequence than the mother, right?
Obviously, it's a different human being.
It has components of the mother's DNA and components of the father's genetics, but it's something new and unique and unlike any other being ever in the history of ever.
So, you know, I think you can apply it to that, and you can say, look, the act of procreation, the act of...
Fertilizing an egg creates a unique DNA signature that is sacred as a component of its existence.
It is sacred.
So therefore, you don't have a right to destroy this new and beautiful and totally unique DNA.
In the same way, I think there should be just, again, beyond Beyond just a legal concern, but like a spiritual concern, you just don't mess with DNA.
You don't mess with human DNA.
Even animal DNA, I'm a little iffy on.
You just have to understand, at least in my interpretation, there is no benefit greater than the risk.
I don't care if you can go in and program the DNA to get rid of You know, some hereditary condition.
It doesn't matter to me.
What you're doing when you talk about messing with DNA is opening up Pandora's box.
And Alex has talked about this forever.
It used to be right up there with the gay frogs, the chimeras.
People would be like, he's worried about chimeras.
What do you not understand?
People are already, as we speak, manipulating human DNA, splicing human DNA with animal DNA.
They're already creating...beings that are not quite human, but human enough.
So the question arises, like, does it have the same rights as a human?
I mean, there was a story the other day, Chase covered it because it was when he was covering my show, I believe, about, you know, creating human bodies to harvest for organs.
And, like, that's the type of dystopian...
Hellish, satanic nonsense.
I think we could just avoid by agreeing, by understanding that DNA itself is literally sacred and that messing with it should be like messing with the host during a Catholic service, during communion.
It's got to be something that is sacred beyond approach, like anybody that suggests that we manipulate DNA should be treated like a pariah.
I don't know how we get to that point.
I don't think we need a church of DNA, but I think we need to fold our modern scientific understanding in with our religious interpretation and understand that there is something about DNA that is holy.
And consecrated.
And should not be messed with.
Now the good news, there is a silver lining to this, okay?
Because again, the story, while not entirely true, what they're running with, what they're claiming that they're doing is reviving extinct animals like dire wolves or woolly mammoths and bringing extinct animals back to life.
There's hope for the white race yet.
Don't worry, folks.
Just as the white race is eradicated from existence, and as the last generations of white people are hunted down and eliminated in the righteous pursuit of equality, at about that same time, they'll be genetically modifying Chinese people to look white, and it'll be like it never happened.
It'll be amazing, won't it?
Won't that be amazing?
So again, there's already so many examples of like where this is sort of getting horrifying.
Vigilant Fox is a great thread on this.
Joe Rogan guest offers a bone-chilling look into the dark side of gene editing.
This is already happening in China.
Biotech entrepreneur Ben Lam painted a bone-chilling picture of where humanity could be headed in episode...
2301 of the Joe Rogan experience.
Gene editing was at the heart of the conversation, and according to Lam, China isn't just experimenting with it, they've already created genetically modified children, which of course they have.
He pointed to a now infamous case in 2018 when Chinese scientist He Jianqiu announced he'd cloned human embryos and edited their genes using CRISPR to make them resistant to HIV.
The news shocked the world and led to widespread condemnation.
He was later sentenced to prison for violating scientific ethics and conducting unapproved procedures.
I find myself a little bit torn.
Sort of the perfect story for China.
It's like the bad and the good, right?
The bad thing about China is they seem to lack in the whole humanity department.
Not all Chinese.
People, but the Chinese culture as a whole, let's just say, not quite up there in ranking when it comes to, you know, respecting basic tenets of humanity.
The words suicide net point to that.
But so do videos that I've seen.
Too many videos that I've seen of, you know, People getting run over in China and the people just keep driving because they have this weird culture where like if you save somebody, you are then responsible for them.
It's all disturbing, messed up and weird.
So that's the bad.
The bad is like, yeah, if anybody is going to clone human embryos and manipulate them without concern for the implications of that, yeah, it's going to be China.
But then they've got this other thing where they do stuff like execute scientists for violating their ethics.
It's like, that I like, actually.
That's actually good.
I don't know why they can do it and we can't.
Seems like we should be able to.
We think of how many, I mean, in some cases, billionaires or Anthony Fauci.
Like, there are all these people that, like, yeah, if we were in China, they'd all be dead.
The Sackler family, the opioid crisis, right?
The people behind the economic incentives to poison 100,000 people a year to death.
Yeah. They should all be given capital punishment.
That's what would happen in China.
China would do it.
China doesn't shy away from executing bankers or...
You know, industrialists that screw over their people.
I mean, all this guy did, all this guy did was edit human embryos.
Now, while that's, again, I think a sort of spitting in the face of God and sort of in a way blasphemous and horrible, I agree.
But it didn't kill tens of thousands of people.
It didn't give mental illness to an entire generation of Americans.
It didn't give lifelong debilitating conditions to uncountable millions through fake poisonous shots they force in everybody's arm.
So, you know, If you're going to weigh these two acts, I think the crimes against humanity outweigh the crimes against DNA.
But in China, this guy goes to jail for cloning embryos, and Anthony Fauci's still out there telling us the next one's going to be even worse.
Trust me.
Okay, so there's a good and a bad.
There's sides to each one of these things.
But again, it is bad.
It is very disturbing to know that people are manipulating DNA.
And I almost want to connect this to something else that I saw yesterday.
I'm going to have to find this other thread.
Wait a second, I may have just found it that quickly.
I did.
From Uber Boyo on X. Liberals have made racism a religion because their brains are malfunctioning.
There's a part of our brain called the posterior medial frontal cortex.
Zap it with magnets, and it'll lower your belief in God and racism at the same time.
This is the threat detection center of your mind, which is why it's wary of strangers.
In nature, all strangers are dangerous, and so cautious racism makes sense.
But how does this affect the belief in God, or why does this affect belief in God?
Your existence and ability to deal with threats hinges on your tribe.
God is the oversoul of a large group of people operating as one.
This is why the Ten Commandments regulates tribal relations.
Don't steal, don't kill, don't lust, don't cheat on your wife.
But Yahweh soon after commands the rape, pillaging, and murder of Jericho.
A healthy people fighting for survival always see themselves as chosen by God.
This healthy people would have their threat detection centers firing on all cylinders, hence the staunch piety and racism.
The comfortable liberal in the urban city faces sinning, Urban City Cafe faces no threats, so their brain atrophies.
They become open to strangers and stop seeing God and tribal sexual morality as serious.
This forms into the liberal worldview, be an open-minded, tolerant guy who is not tribalistic or pushy.
There's no objective reality to liberal morality.
It's just misfiring brain functions.
What's disastrous is that these brain systems are enforced as moral truth in our hate speech laws.
The Nazis are the great evil because they inverted this so starkly.
Their nationalism was beyond anything you'd even see today.
A true paganism which unites religious convictions in the sense that your race is chosen.
Race and religion as one.
Our race is the chosen race and God is with us.
The most evil sentence in the modern world.
But with certain exclusions.
And of course, you know, he shows the chart.
The classic heat map chart showing moral allocation by ideology.
With the left being conservatives and their moral center being inward and close to themselves while liberals literally value rocks and potential bugs on Mars more than they value their own friends and family.
Again, these aren't just like options.
It's not like, well, you could have your moral circle around your family or you could have it around strangers.
Both is good.
It's up to you.
It's just a choice you're making.
No, one of these is a malfunction.
One of them is misfiring of your brain function.
It's a sort of disease that liberals are inflicted with.
It seems like I changed subjects.
I didn't.
Did I?
Because what do you think they're going to do with genetic manipulation?
What do you think the people who put us through COVID Would choose to do with the power to manipulate your genetics.
Do you think they'd make you believe in God more?
Do you think they'd make you more xenophobic and therefore increase your survival chance?
Or do you think that the ability to manipulate human genetics is the final nail in the coffin for humanity itself?
Because the people wielding it We'd use it almost exclusively to create a race of slaves and empower themselves.
Because that's the world we're going into.
I mean, you think AI is disruptive?
What do you think happens when one group of people in this world is able to essentially hack their own brains and increase their average IQ to 160?
While simultaneously Breeding legions of unthinking biological automata.
What do you think happens as that compounds?
As you manipulate genetics to make your children smarter and so they already start with this major head start in terms of intellect that will only compound as they Put their intellect to work, they'll make major advancements, which will allow them to get even more powerful.
I mean, you're starting down a feedback loop, and you're giving people over the power of God.
And again, if you want to know what lies at the end of the rabbit hole, at the bottom of the warren, the ultimate conspiracy is Satanism, and it's follow me.
Follow logic and you two will be as gods.
You will live forever.
I've explained a million times.
People in power, they're not manipulating DNA to create Jurassic Park.
They're not bringing back dire wolves because they think it's cool and are fans of Game of Thrones.
They're testing and normalizing the manipulation of genetics.
Because they think that they can eliminate aging in themselves and create a race of brainless slaves in the rest of us.
So the story that came out yesterday about these dire wolves, it's not true.
This wasn't the classic Jurassic Park.
Oh, we found DNA from a million years ago and cloned it and now we have dinosaurs.
This was genetically manipulating wolves to...
Events genetic characteristics of dire wolves.
It was gene altering.
It was genetic manipulation.
It was creating a new race or a new species by manipulating and distorting and arguably destroying the genetic perfection of nature.
So they're normalizing that.
And they're doing it in a way to make you Celebrate it.
Wow, isn't that so cool?
Extinct animals.
What a miracle.
No, no, no.
It's normalizing and getting you to accept the idea that they can create species.
So they could create a species of humans that doesn't believe in God.
Doesn't have the will to resist.
I mean, you can do things.
I mean, if you really think about it.
All you need to do, folks, is have an imagination.
Have an imagination and say to yourself, if I was a truly despicable, evil scoundrel, what would I do with practically magical technology?
And what you would do, if you were one of these evil people, is you could go in and, you know, Program in people to have a...
We could get to the point where it's like Dune, where you could have the voice, right?
Where you can program in people to be super, super susceptible to hypnosis.
Where you could find that gene, isolate the hypnosis gene, maximize the potential for hypnosis, and have people that...
I mean, we're getting to just straight up Brave New World.
I mean, if you want to know where this goes, it is just literally Brave New World where, you know, giving physical birth is seen as disgusting like vile and needs to be censored.
Everybody being clones and those clones being deliberately manufactured with certain defects that make them easy to control.
Now in Brave New World, it was like they would just like put a little alcohol in the tincture when the baby was being created and that's how you had, you know, the alphas and the...
That really is the world that they're trying to create.
That really is just a world of bug-eating golems is what they're trying to create.
So you can maximize the hypnosis gene and have people that will just do what you say without thinking about it.
You could program that right in.
You could literally program anything.
Just understand our consciousness can be broken down into an extremely complicated and convoluted but still physically able to be understood mechanical function.
So you can really do anything.
You can do anything with this.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
And you just think about, like, again, you think about Brave New World, one of the scenes that stands out to me, it's like one of the first scenes in the whole thing, is you have these little kids being programmed to, like, hate nature,
right? They set up a bunch of little flowers and plants, and the kids naturally are attracted to them, wander over, and then they're, like, shocked, and they play a really loud, scary noise just to associate, you know, to associate nature with pain so that People don't seek nature and they actually want to live in sort of concrete, like that's where they're comfortable.
They don't even understand, you know, the people in Brave New World, they didn't understand it.
It wasn't like conscious to them, just something subconscious.
They're like, oh, I feel comfortable here when it's all just like stark and concrete.
And if they're out in nature, they feel discomfort, they feel anxiety because it's been programmed into them.
You could do that at the genetic level.
And you could actually program people to like...
despise responsibility to despise the other sex to despise freedom you can literally you could literally program people and they already are to a very large degree through you know bio engineering hacking through like dopamine receptors through social media like there are already ways that they do this but they're telling us with this story about the wolf cub Understand,
they're telling us this is what's coming.
That we will soon be able to be gods ourselves.
They'll be able to manipulate DNA to eliminate the aging function, right?
They'll be able to give birth to a baby knowing that this baby will never die.
Maybe never even grow old.
And just let your mind run wild with what is possible in genetic hacking and understanding that not only are they already doing it, they're now embarked on a media campaign to normalize it and get people to accept it.
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
Okay? So...
I don't know how one founds a religion, but if we could create a religion about the...
Sacredness of DNA.
I think we could, uh, forestall and preempt a lot of these problems.
This is the American Journal.
We're actually joined in the 10 o'clock hour by Jeremy Brown.
Talk a little bit about what, uh, what is ahead for the January 6th defendants.
The political prisoners.
You know, I was just trying to...
Just trying to figure out what to...
Okay, before we move on, I think I'll play one more video here.
I posted this yesterday and it actually has to do with the tariffs on China.
But I think it relates to what we were just talking about with genetic manipulation and all this sort of stuff.
Because in order to determine what...
Powers to be would do with direct code access to your genetics.
All you have to do is look at what else they've done in the medical sphere to enslave and control you.
And you can just assume that that pattern would continue.
What I said on X was...
If China shuts off the supply of pharmaceuticals to the U.S., you would see millions of psychotics forced to go off their meds cold turkey and be literally driven insane.
It would be devastating to the Democrat base.
Just a joke, obviously, but pointing out the danger of having economies so deeply intertwined.
We rely on the things that keep us alive are supplied by our enemies.
Not a good idea in general.
That was sort of the point I was making.
But anytime I think about that and I think about just play out in my head, what would it be like if just tomorrow every pharmaceutical was cut off?
We get 90% of our pharmaceuticals from China.
Just what if all of the painkillers, all of the antipsychotics, all of the Heartburn medication, everything.
What if everything was cut off tomorrow?
And certainly, some people would just die.
That would certainly be the case.
A lot of people would literally go insane.
Even people that weren't insane before, you know, if you're on any psychotics for a long enough time, you can't really get off of them exactly.
And while that would be incredibly painful, there's also part of me that's like, yeah, maybe that would be, maybe that's what we need.
Maybe we need a big ol' countrywide intervention, considering the fact that half of our young women are on SSRIs.
And I think probably none of them should be, considering especially the fact that it's publicly acknowledged now that SSRIs do not function in the way that we thought they did, and don't actually contribute to overcoming depression.
And I always think about this documentary I saw.
Which is an absolutely amazing but kind of brutal and heartbreaking and disheartening documentary called American Hollow.
American Hollow is about a family in sort of the Appalachian Hills and it's a documentary about the generations and it's the grandparents who are just the most old-fashioned Farmers in the world, like they're out there at 80 years old driving the plow and then their kids don't quite live up to them and then the grandkids are just sort of a mess.
None of them have jobs, like they get extra money by just going out and collecting mushrooms and selling them for like 50 cents a pound and it's just a really stark and powerful vision of American collapse really overall and one of the main characters The dad, not the grandfather, but the second generation.
His plot in the documentary is that he's waiting on his Prozac to be delivered.
And you just see this, well, you just see what the effects are of these types of programs.
He's on disability, and he literally just does nothing all day, and he's just zonked out.
On antidepressants.
And so then there's some sort of mix-up, and he has to go three days without it.
And despite for the whole first three quarters of the movie, he's fine with his life.
He has no complaints.
He's like, yeah, this is great.
This is just what I do all day.
I just hang out.
And then he goes without Prozac for three days.
And for the first time...
He actually starts to question what the hell he's doing with his life.
And this scene has always stuck with me since I saw this documentary for the first time.
Let's go now to clip number one.
A man on disability has to go three days without Prozac and for the first time begins to question the life that he lives.
Let's watch.
unidentified
I was hoping to go down and get my dad burn medicine at the con today.
But don't, I'm going to call Polly and ask for what you do with my paperwork to get it.
I've been heading home for three days.
Never gone this long without it since I've been on it.
I've been on it over four years.
Right now, I'd kill to get it.
How would you like to live like this and stay on the porch?
Don't go nowhere, drive or do nothing.
Take medicine every day and every night.
harrison smith
And then literally in the very next scene, He gets his Prozac delivered and he's literally dancing.
He's in the kitchen just like dancing that he got his Prozac.
So he can be zonked out zombie and not have the anxiety of thinking about that for too long.
Now I'm not demonizing this guy.
I feel bad for this guy.
This guy is a slave to his medicine that was given to him by a doctor.
He's not a drug addict in the traditional sense going out and robbing people to get a heroin fix.
He is taking the medicine as prescribed by the doctor.
And it leaves him in a state of willing death, basically.
All he does is sit on his porch and not go anywhere all day.
And that's all he ever does.
And it's not until he's off Prozac for three days that he's like, what am I doing?
What is it?
I just sit all day on a porch?
I don't go anywhere?
I don't do anything?
And it's like, right as he's having this revelation, realization, they deliver the Prozac.
He's like, oh, thank God.
I don't have to think about this anymore.
That's America.
That's America right there, right?
That is America.
If we were clear-headed, had a good conscience, Yeah, this is him taking the Prozac for the first time in three days.
He literally does like a, whoo!
Yeah, I don't even think that's how Prozac works.
I think this is all a placebo effect.
I'm not sure, but I'm pretty sure antidepressants, like, they tell you, like, yeah, it takes like a month to kick in, and you have to take it every day, but it's not a, I don't know, maybe Prozac's different, but it's not like an amphetamine, I don't think.
I don't think you feel it right away, and I don't think if you stop taking it for three days, You know, I don't know.
I don't know.
I don't know that much about Prozac, but it seems to me like there's a certain placebo effect going on here too.
Where he's able to mentally accept stagnation because the medicine's making him okay with it.
If you take that medicine away, he suddenly looks around and goes, what the hell am I doing with my life?
What am I doing here?
Why am I just sitting all day doing nothing?
unidentified
Thank you.
Thank you.
harrison smith
So again, this might seem a little bit disjointed to some of you, but there's something there, isn't there?
There's something there.
I mean, we're talking about China being responsible for all of our pharmaceuticals, and that gets you into the question of how over-reliant we are on pharmaceuticals.
And it gets to the question of like, are we literally deadening ourselves to reality as a coping mechanism rather than doing what we should be doing and need to be doing for permanent positive change?
Are we not just medicating ourselves into acceptance of a world that we should not accept?
And that goes right to the heart of Aldous Huxley and Brave New World.
Where his whole thing is summed up in the statement where he says, you're going to have a world of people manipulated by pharmaceuticals to accept situations that they should not accept.
To be happy as slaves.
And that's the ultimate goal.
That's the ultimate plan.
That's where these technologies are being employed.
That's the ultimate goal and whether it's through pharmaceutical manipulation and putting people on pills to make them accept their stagnation or whether they have direct right access to your internal hard drive it's not for your benefit and it's not because they love you and want what's best for you.
So there you go.
So there you go.
Now, I wanted to move on and this is trending on X. It's Ursula van der Leyen talking about the values of Europe.
European values, of course, big topic of conversation these days with J.D. Vance going to Germany and the Munich Security Conference.
And basically lambasting Europe, asking them, what are your values?
What do you even believe now?
You're supposed to be our partners, America and the West, supporting free speech, due process, equality under the law.
These are supposed to be European values.
I don't know what your values are now, because clearly you have abandoned free speech.
You've abandoned equality under the law.
You've abandoned the hard-won rights developed and established by force over thousands of years.
What are you doing?
Well, Ursula von der Leyen has a different interpretation of European values and an inexplicable statement.
Here's where she claims...
Europe is the values of the Talmud.
unidentified
The Jewish sense of personal responsibility, of justice, and of solidarity.
harrison smith
European values are the values of the Talmud?
Now, if you're like me, you just laughed at this because of how utterly absurd it is.
I don't even explain this.
I don't even explain how utterly wrong that is.
And so I thought I'd pull up the Talmud.
I thought I'd pull it up.
Now, the Talmud is interesting.
In a number of different ways.
There's a CBC documentary from the Canadian Broadcasting Company called something like What's the Deal with the Jews?
It's probably from 20 years ago.
They have this one segment where they're in a museum in Germany and they have a display in this German museum called Ask a Jew.
And there's just a Jewish guy sitting on a chair sort of reading a book and you could go up and you could ask the Jew questions.
And the idea was, I'm sure it was like a World War II museum or something, and the idea was, well, a lot of Germans don't know Jews, have never met a Jew in real life.
And so now they have a chance.
Now they can go up and talk to a real-life Jew right there in the museum.
And it was funny because they asked the guy, they asked the Jewish guy, you know, what do people ask?
And he says, well, it's so funny, you know, people come in and they ask me, do Jews have a holy book?
And I have to laugh.
I tell them it's the same holy book as yours.
It's the Torah.
The first five books of the Bible.
We have the same holy...
Not only do Jews have a holy book, it's the same holy book.
It's just ignorance.
They think we don't have a holy book.
We have the same holy book.
It's the Torah.
It's the first five books of the Bible.
It's Genesis, Exodus.
It's the Torah.
And then the very next scene is a scene in New York and it's Jewish guys traveling, I think, from New Jersey to New York on a train and it's these Jewish groups...gather every morning to study the Talmud.
And it's like, well, wait.
The guy in the museum just said the Holy Book is the Torah, but these guys are doing a Bible study every morning on the Talmud.
Now, the Talmud is not the Torah.
The Talmud is commentary on the Torah, which basically exists to justify the fact that the Torah is no longer applicable for the Jews after 70 AD.
Right? If all of Judaism is centered around the temple and the Holy Land and God himself residing in the Holy of Holies, well, if that's all destroyed and doesn't count anymore, then you need another set of laws.
You need a reinterpretation of the laws of the Torah.
The Talmud is just commentary on the Torah and it is basically entirely arbitrary.
There are no values expressed in the Talmud, as far as I can tell.
And again, you can just search the Talmud and find PDFs of it.
But this is where it gets kind of funny or kind of interesting.
Because you hear Ursula von der Leyen say that the values of Europe are the values of the Talmud.
And at first that sounds ridiculous.
And then you realize that the Talmud is basically just an extremely convoluted collection of legalistic...
interpretations of defunct and nonsensical laws and it's like, okay, that actually explains it.
That actually explains a lot about the EU.
I mean, if you talk about what the EU actually is, it's a continually evolving set of legalistic interpretations about laws that have long since diverged from the purpose of the law in the first place.
It's actually an extremely Interesting interpretation of Europe itself.
And I'm not kidding.
I mean, if you just go through the list of...
This is just from jewishvirtuallibrary.org, the Babylonian Talmud.
There are multiple versions of the Talmud, so maybe we should get some clarification on which one Ursula's talking about.
But it's like, tell me if this doesn't sound like I'm reading a publication from the EU.
This is what's so strange about it.
It's like...
I'll read the chapter headings, and you tell me if this sounds like a religion or a set of, I don't know, a lawyer's wet dream, just a set of legalistic madness.
Chapter 1, Regulations Regarding Transfer on Sabbath.
Chapter 2, regulations concerning the Sabbath and Hanukkah light.
Regulations concerning stoves, hearths, and ovens.
Regulations concerning victuals, where they may or may not be deposited to retain their heat for the Sabbath.
Concerning what may and may not be worn by animals on the Sabbath.
Regulations concerning what garments women may go out with on the Sabbath.
The general rule concerning the principal acts of labor on the Sabbath.
It's like, your holy book is literally just a giant list of do's and don'ts for Saturday.
It's a giant list of what you are and are not allowed to do on Saturdays.
It's like, okay, But, I mean, look.
If you're saying that the spiritual center of the EU is a book where the first word of every chapter is regulations, I don't know.
There's something there.
There's something to that.
It's a giant book of regulations.
It's a giant book of arbitrary and contradictory laws.
Yeah, it's the EU.
No, it's actually extremely accurate.
I actually agree with this.
The general rule concerning the principal acts of labor on the Sabbath.
Regulations concerning prescribed quantities of victuals and beverages which must not be carried about on the Sabbath.
unidentified
Okay? Okay.
harrison smith
So, what you can and cannot do on Saturdays.
That's the whole first book of Talmud, I guess.
Now we have chapters 11 through 26. Regulations concerning throwing from one ground into another.
Regulations concerning building, plowing, etc.
on the Sabbath.
Regulations concerning weaving, tearing, hunting, etc.
on the Sabbath.
Regulations concerning the catching of reptiles, animals, and birds.
Not on the Sabbath, just at any point.
What a novel idea.
Regulations concerning the tying and untying of knots on the Sabbath.
Yeah, you know what?
You want to talk about the EU and what it actually is.
I don't think you'll find a better example than this.
Than sort of...
Arbitrary, unnecessary, inconsistent rules to be enforced with religious dogma and, you know, violations seen as blasphemy and sacrilege.
Like, but why are we doing this?
It's like, just tie the knot.
The regulation says tie the knot.
Okay. All right, I guess.
Regulations concerning handling of utensils and furniture on the Sabbath.
Regulations concerning articles which may be saved from conflagration on the Sabbath.
So there you go.
If your house is burning, you can violate the Sabbath laws to save certain things.
Again, just sort of legalistic nonsense.
Regulations regarding the clearing off of required space, the assistance to be given to cattle when giving birth to their young and to women about to be confined.
Confining women.
Ah, yes.
Ah, yes.
When I think about European, what lies at the heart of the European spirit, I think about women being confined during menstruation.
I think about ritualistic cleaning before touching is allowed.
Regulation concerning the pouring out of wine from vessels covered with a stone which may not be lifted and the clearing off of crumbs, etc.
from the table.
We could ask ChatGPT, which has more regulations, the Talmud or the European Convention on States' Rights?
Regulations concerning preparing of food and beverages, borrowing, casting lots, waiting for the close of Sabbath, and attending to a corpse.
Regulations concerning a man who's overtaken by dusk on the eve of the Sabbath while traveling and concerning the feeding of cattle.
Regulations concerning a man who is overtaken by dusk on the eve of the Sabbath while traveling.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
And like you read this stuff and you understand like the point that Jesus was making in like almost all of his teaching was that the ceremonial legalistic adherence to the law is worthless if the spirit doesn't align with it.
Like all of his fables Not all of them, but a lot of his fables, a lot of his stories that he tells had this lesson at the center of saying it really doesn't matter if you go and sacrifice an unblemished goat in the temple if you aren't actually repentant for the thing that you did.
You have to actually genuinely Like it's better to actually genuinely desire forgiveness and repent for what you did wrong than it is to kill the chicken, right?
Killing the chicken is supposed to be a symbolic act to remind you of your spiritual transformation, but it's not supposed to be the point in and of itself.
And when the rules and regulations supersede and become more important than the underlying value that they're supposed to be teaching or enforcing, then everything is topsy-turvy and inverted and you're way off the mark.
And so the reason why, you know, the Good Samaritan, right?
Samaritan was a race of people.
It's a funny name of a parable.
The Good Samaritan.
It'd be like saying the good black person, right?
The Good Mexican.
It's like, actually, there's a good one out there.
unidentified
It's like, okay.
harrison smith
But that's because the original Jewish teaching had the Jews as separate from everybody else and everybody else as unclean and so it was actually blasphemy in their interpretation, the interpretation of the Pharisees, for Jesus to be saying actually that unclean non-Jew is the better person than the high priest of the Jews who refused to help the person on the road.
The high priests walk right by the Levites walk right by the person who needs help.
It's the Samaritan, the unclean person, that stops and helps them.
And so Jesus says, who's the better person here?
Whose behavior should you be modeling yourself after?
Is it the priest who walks by the injured man?
Or is it the dirty, unclean, Gentile, you know, beast Samaritan who actually stops and helps his fellow man?
unidentified
*music*
harrison smith
So I don't know.
So maybe it's true.
Maybe European values really do come from the Talmud, where it all seems to be fairly pointless adherence to an extremely large, convoluted, nonsensical set of regulations imposed for reasons that are no longer clear or even applicable.
So yeah, I think that's a good point, Ursula.
Welcome back, folks.
unidentified
This is the third hour of American Journal.
harrison smith
You're watching us on infowars.com forward slash show, band.video.
Maybe you're streaming us on X, however you're finding us.
Thank you so much for being here with us.
You can support us, of course, by going to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison.
Let me just get through some of these headlines.
Although we're in this first five minutes, maybe I'll go to a video here.
I think I will.
I think I'll go to clip number 13. Because as we talk about tariffs and I want to get into the Nashville shooter, Audrey Hale, and that report.
But as we talk about all this stuff, we have to remember that still, as we speak, there are no less than three flashpoints where the globalists are trying desperately to bring about world war.
It's obviously China and Taiwan, Ukraine and Russia, and Israel and Iran.
And I want to play this video.
Clip number 13. These are veterans, young men, from the Vietnam War in a bar in Chicago in 1970 talking about their experience.
Because as we...
Talk at a high level about geopolitics and agreements and treaties and negotiations.
It's worth going down to ground level and reminding ourselves about the real human cost of this military adventurism and profiteering.
Let's go now to clip number 13. Young men discuss the Vietnam War in a bar in Chicago, 1970.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Oh, yeah.
Well, I got, you know, I got hit by a piece of General Motors shrapnel, you know, from 81 Mortar.
You know, they dug it out of my leg and it said GM and it had the numbers on it and everything, you know.
So, uh, General Motors is making mortars, man.
You know, that's, uh, what else can I tell you?
Like, they're making money, you know, that's what it's all about.
Like, they're supposed to be making cars.
I'm saying if our government didn't spend so much money on other nations, giving them aid, giving them everything we have.
We'd be better off, because we could spend our money on poverty.
We could clean up the city.
And it's not like a war where, you know, World War II, where we won, and that was it, and it's all over.
Now, how do you think we're ever going to disinvolve ourselves from Vietnam?
Win it.
Yeah, but you can't win a war like that.
Who's paying for the war?
We are.
We are.
For what?
That's right, for what?
For what?
You were there.
You were there for...
You got wounded three times.
Twice, or whatever it was.
Last time I got hit, I got hit in the head.
We had 57 killed and 140 wounded.
And, like, my whole platoon was completely wiped out except for about three or four guys, you know.
And it's, like, it's really strange.
I went down to Indiana for my buddy's funeral, you know, because he was a real good friend of mine.
And it's really to see it, you know, what the people really go through, you know, when their son gets killed, especially a favorite son.
Like, he was the only son in the family.
harrison smith
When is enough enough?
How many decades are we going to accept just being manipulated and slaughtered and destroyed for no benefit to us at all?
You think about everything else you know was going on around the time of Vietnam.
Think about the Gulf of Tonkin false flag incident.
Think about the drug manufacturing and dealing that the CIA was involved in.
Getting these very men addicted to heroin while in Vietnam.
Think about just the pointless shattering waste of life.
And we're no different now.
We're really no different now.
We're the same young men coming back from the same pointless overseas wars with the same visible and invisible injuries.
And for what?
Because how long are we as a people going to keep being destroyed like this?
Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
We actually just came out with a new product yesterday at TheAlexJonesStore.com and I want to tell you about it.
It's called Ultimate Burn, powered by Calorie Burn and GlucoVantage.
You can ignite your fat loss journey today at TheAlexJonesStore.com.
Say goodbye to stubborn fat and hello to a leaner, stronger you with Ultimate Burn, this cutting-edge stimulant.
Stimulant-free thermogenic supplement combines the power of calorie burn and gluco-vantage to supercharge your metabolism, optimize nutrient use, and torch calories all without the jitters.
Whether you're sculpting your physique or shedding excess weight, Ultimate Burn is your secret weapon for real results.
Here's why it works.
It boosts calorie burning.
Calorie burn, and that's a copyrighted...
Supplement. It activates brown fat to increase energy expenditure, potentially burning up to 100 to 200 extra calories daily.
Targets stubborn fat.
Thermogenic power.
Helps melt visceral fat while preserving lean muscles.
Optimizes carbs.
GlucoVantage directs glucose to muscles, not fat, for better energy and body composition.
Stabilizes energy, regulates blood sugar to curve cravings to keep you focused.
No crashes, just results.
Stimulant-free formula, all-day fat-burning support without caffeine or jitters.
It's got a science-backed edge with calorie burn derived from grains of paradise.
This natural extract fires up your metabolism and fights inflammation, while GlucoVantage is a potent form of dihydroberberine, and it enhances insulin sensitivity and nutrition partitioning.
So this isn't a like fad diet type thing, right?
Losing weight is a very simple physics equation.
You want to be burning more calories than you're taking in.
You burn more than you're taking in, you lose weight.
If you take in more than you burn, you gain weight.
It really is as simple as that.
And so what ultimate burn does is helps to maximize the natural functions in your body.
So that you're burning more calories and retaining less.
It's not there as a one-size-fits-all, just take this and you'll lose weight.
It will help you in every aspect of your weight loss journey, whether that's trying to eat less, trying to work out more, having more energy, curbing your appetite.
It helps contribute to all of those things and can just help you do what's necessary to lose weight, which is, as I said, a very simple mathematical physical equation where you have to...
Eat less and work out more.
And Ultimate Burn helps you with all of those things in all the ways I just described in order to maximize your energy usage as well as get rid of the visceral body fats.
And it can contribute to all of that.
It's perfect for fitness enthusiasts aiming for a leaner physique, anyone seeking sustainable fat loss without stimulants, and pairing with diet and exercise for maximum impact.
And there's a special offer on right now.
Now it's the introductory offer at the Alex Jones store.com.
You can get ultimate burn for 50% off your first order by subscribing and getting on the, Again, I'm just going to tell you the truth,
right? Weight loss has never really been an issue for me because I've just always been skinny and I just don't have a big appetite.
And thank God, because I have no self-control.
I mean, my lord.
If my genetics were a little bit different, I would be as big as a house because I can't control myself when it comes to sweets and fatty foods.
I mean, my ideal meal is like a rare fatty steak and end it with a gigantic bowl of ice cream.
I just got lucky, to be honest with you.
And I've tried to gain weight, and I'm not good at it.
I just got no self-control.
So I just thank God it's that way, and I understand, and I feel bad for people that don't have that metabolism, and I understand that it's not easy to lose weight if your body is not predisposed to it.
So this is something that can really, really help you lose weight.
I'm not going to sit here and say, I was 300 pounds before I took Ultimate Burn, and that's all I did.
I didn't change my lifestyle at all.
I just took Ultimate Burn, and now I'm 180 pounds.
It's like, I don't have any experience with this.
I'm not going to take it, but I've looked into it, and it's not a fad.
It's not a one-size-fits-all.
It's not a just take this, and it's not Ozempic, right?
Because, well, it's not going to have some of the side effects that Ozempic has.
It's not going to melt your fat away, but it's also not going to atrophy your buccal fat and make you look like a diseased skeleton.
No, it's just what you need to maximize your own potential in your weight loss journey.
I encourage people to go out and try it.
TheAlexJonesStore.com and let us know how it works.
Let us know how it works for you.
I think it's going to be an extremely powerful and probably very popular.
And we only have a limited amount, so if you want to try it, now is the time.
And with that, let's get into this, because I talked about it yesterday, and I wasn't able to get into it.
Maybe we'll try not to spend too much time on this, but this is the final summary of the investigation into the shooting in Nashville.
At the Covenant Presbyterian Church and School by the shooter Audrey Hale.
Now there's I don't even know how I put this.
There's a lot of information in here.
There's also no information in here.
It's kind of weird.
It's kind of strange.
They seem to be doing everything they can to downplay The troublesome aspects of Audrey Hale, what led her to commit the shooting, and why she targeted where she targeted.
And just going through this, this is sort of how certain aspects of this shooting are treated, things like transgenderism.
Now, we already know from what's already been released from the writings of Audrey Hale that her transgenderism As well as her racial views contributed directly to her carrying out this mass shooting.
Here's how it's treated in the introduction by the Nashville Metro Police.
Quote, And throughout the incident described in this summary and in the case file, Hale will be referred to as a female.
Now that's about as far as they go with the transgender aspect.
And the racial aspect is another one.
This is from New York Post.
Trans Nashville school shooter Audrey Hale ranted about wanting to, quote, kill all the white kids in newly revealed diary entries.
Now, in this official report, They list out an enormous amount of material gathered from Audrey Hale, but they don't show you any of it.
It's very weird.
It's very bizarre.
And you'll hear just how much information they gathered, and yet none of it has been revealed.
Now compare that to other shooters, other events that we've seen.
Christchurch shooter in New Zealand.
That manifesto is absolutely everywhere.
Elliot Rodger, the incel shooter in California, his manifesto is absolutely everywhere.
Some manifestos get released immediately, before the shooting's even over.
They're being spread everywhere.
In this case, the police have done everything they possibly could to limit the knowledge that we have about the motives behind this gruesome and horrific shooting.
However, there are a few things in this that might hint to a...
Deeper motive here.
But there's also some other interesting things.
This is just almost as a side note, but basically, she shot her way into the school, so she shot through glass, and when she fired through the glass, says this, quote, she was standing underneath a smoke detector positioned on the ceiling near the entrance she used to enter the school.
Gun smoke from the muzzle of her AR pistol drifted upwards when she shot Hill, which set off the smoke detector and triggered the building's audible fire alarm.
The activation of the fire alarm also led to the magnetic door locks on doors separating the church from the school to become disengaged per state fire codes.
So this, you know, I don't really know what you do about this, but it seems like they have two systems in the school.
They have the security system, which has things like magnetic doors, magnetic locks on the doors to keep things like a potential shooter from accessing different parts of the school.
But then they have a fire system that automatically unlocks those doors in the event that there's smoke detected.
So there's got to be a way to fix that, right?
So not only did the fire alarm go off, which forced everybody out in the hallways, making them easier targets, but it unlocked all the doors and gave the shooter access to the entire building because the smoke alarm went off.
So that's just one aspect of a...
A failure of infrastructure, I guess you'd say.
Now, one event that I was not aware of until this report was this.
Upon reaching the second floor, Hale found herself in the upper level main lobby to the sanctuary.
She then entered the sanctuary itself, reaching the upper level.
Once there, she fired several shots through a stained glass window positioned high on the wall in the sanctuary with her carbine.
Though the window was damaged, it wasn't destroyed.
The window she targeted depicted Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden.
So I think that's interesting.
She goes into this chapel.
She wasn't firing through the window at anybody.
She just chose to take aim and fire at the image of man created by God, male and female in his image.
So that's a little bit telling, I think.
A choice that she made during this shooting that might hint at some deeper motives going on.
So in her car, With her on the day of the shooting, they discovered in the front passenger floorboard was a backpack.
Inside the backpack, there were two notebooks containing handwriting and sketches along with two thumb drives.
Then they established her identity, went to her house where they found in the closet located a white t-shirt with hand-printed words and a logo similar to the one she wore during the attack.
Throughout the room, detectives located numerous notebooks, folders, sketchbooks, and loose documents that contained personal writings, artwork, sales receipts, and lists made by Hale Five cell phones, two laptop computers, VHS cassette tapes, and several thumb drives were also found within the bedroom On her desk was a handwritten note addressed to her parents In the note, Hale told her parents she was going to die and instructed them to care for her belongings So they'll show you a picture of this, by the way.
I might have already gone by it.
There's the picture of the...
...of the actual t-shirt.
They have a whole breakdown of the timeline and everything.
That's less interesting to me as what, you know, came before it.
But one important thing to note, they say, they list the victims, Evelyn Dykhaus, William Kinney, Haley Scruggs for the children, Michael Hill, Dr. Catherine Kuntz, and Cynthia Peek, the six victims murdered by her.
And they note, no information has been found to show Hale had any prior relationship with any of them prior to the attack.
Now that's important.
That's important to me because the question is, why did she target this school in particular?
Why did she target the Covenant School?
She only went to the Covenant School for a few years.
She actually spent a longer time in a different school.
And according to this report, She actually had a good time at Covenant.
When she was at the Covenant school as a kid in middle school, she actually had a good time.
She was treated nicely.
She didn't feel like an outcast or bullied in that school.
And yet that's the school she went back to shoot up.
Now, one reason for that might be if she had a personal animus with somebody at that school.
And that's often the case, right?
There'll be a mass shooting, but the person will go, I want to kill this person.
I'm going to go in and shoot them and anybody else in the room.
I'm going to go do a mass murder but it's this person I'm trying to target in particular or it's this institution I'm trying to target in particular it's this school or DMV or whatever it is that did me wrong and I'm going to go wreck revenge on that.
So since she didn't know any of these people personally, she wasn't targeting any specific person at the school so she was targeting the school itself as a symbol That she was trying to attack, and not because she was bullied there and getting revenge on them, but actually kind of the opposite.
So it says, she attended the Covenant between 2001 and 2005, after which she attended middle school Isaac T. Crestwell Middle Magnet School for the Arts.
She then attended the Nashville School of the Arts, graduating in 2014.
She's also made statements about wanting to transition genders.
She began to use the name Aiden Williams in the years prior to her death and used male pronouns on her social media and networking accounts.
Nothing has been found to suggest she initiated or was undergoing a transition at the time of her death, including medical documentation.
During her autopsy following her death, it was determined she was a biological female.
Now, the transgender aspect of this and of anything else, it gets confusing because The powers that be in the transgender lobby, like they want to have their cake and eat it too.
They want transgenderism treated as a mental illness because then it's a medical condition for which insurance companies can be compelled to pay for the treatment.
So in other words, if it's just normal, if it's not a mental illness, right?
It's not a mental disease.
Then it's not going to be covered by insurance.
Then it's just an elective surgery and you have to pay for it out of pocket.
So they want the insurance companies to pay for it so they have to claim that it's a treatment for a mental illness.
But then you get police reports like this or other violent crimes that take place and they don't want to treat transgenderism as a mental illness because typically if you have somebody with a severe mental illness That would go into the interpretation of why or how they committed their crime.
But they don't want the transgenderism to be included in the discussion of what went wrong and why this person became a mass murderer.
And this is the outcome of it.
Police find 2023 Nashville shooter sought notoriety hid mental health issues.
So their interpretation is they go through all of the, and again, they don't show any of it.
16 notebooks, assorted folders, loose documents, 7 sketchbooks and composition notebooks, a yearbook, 3 VHS tapes, 8 memory storage devices containing nearly 400 gigabytes of data, 6 cell phones, 3 laptops, an iPod, a DVD-R, 2 Google Drive data accounts, 2 social media accounts, Facebook and Instagram.
None of it is presented in this.
Report. None of it.
They'll show you pictures of it.
They show you pictures of the notebooks.
They don't show you any of the writing.
None of the writing.
Now, if I was like a parent of one of the kids who died, I would want to know what was in those documents.
I would want to know what compelled this person to kill my child.
And I'd want all of the information available to try to make that determination.
The police want us, just trust us, bro.
Just trust us.
We looked through the...
And she just really wanted fame.
That's what she was about.
She was about fame and that's all.
Which is convenient because then you can actually justify hiding this information by claiming that you're going against the wishes of the murderer.
Say, well, the murderer just wanted fame and we're not going to give it to her.
So we're not going to show her all of your writing.
Well, that's convenient.
Maybe the writing has some stuff that would be inconvenient for you.
And so you want to hide it.
The 16 notebooks were composition notebooks containing college-ruled lines within.
The notebooks contained handwritten entries, photographs taped to the covers, and on select pages, charts, diagrams, and drawings.
In many of the notebooks, each page was filled with content on both sides of the page.
In total, the notebooks contained 1,300 pages of content.
And you get to see none of it.
They say, just trust us.
There's stories documenting her childhood, spiral-bound notebooks.
So all sorts of stuff, but you're not going to get any of it.
You're not going to be able to read any of it.
You can just trust the police to tell you what they think, the interpretation they had of the data.
Now, the interesting thing about this, they claim that it was simply notoriety that she was after.
She just wanted to be famous.
However, They say a manifesto didn't exist.
Haley never left behind a single document explaining why she committed the attack, why she specifically targeted the Covenant, what she hoped to gain, if anything, with the attacks, as previously mentioned, what did exist were a series of notebooks, art composition books, and media files created by Haley documenting her planning and preparation for the attack, the events in her life that motivated her to commit the attack, and her hopes regarding the outcome of the attack.
Okay, so that is a manifesto.
I don't even get this.
She didn't leave behind a single document explaining why she committed the attack.
But she did leave behind a whole bunch of documents explaining what motivated her to commit the attack and her hopes regarding the outcome of the attack.
No single document, notebook, or digital device contains the answer to those questions.
The answer is scattered throughout all the assembled material, which required a careful review of the material to understand Hale's motive.
and don't worry, we did the review so you don't have to.
unidentified
you.
harrison smith
But this is where it gets kind of inverted and nonsensical.
Hale wrote biographical stories of her formative years, which provided a first-person account of her life.
The available material also included information obtained from her mental health care providers and records from Metro Nashville Public Schools, which Hale kept following her graduation from NSA, the school that she went to.
The information allowed detectives to piece together Hale's formative years and discover the origins of her mental health disorders.
Hale often made mention of her struggles with mental health and claimed these struggles began when she was a toddler.
She claimed to have always been sensitive to loud noises, so she was like autistic or something.
After noticing development delays and believing her to be autistic, Hale's mother took her to a mental health provider for an assessment.
Hale then attended the Covenant from her kindergarten year through the fourth grade.
Hale considered these years the happiest of her childhood.
So again, this is kind of weird, right?
She felt safe and accepted at the Covenant and made friends with other students.
She considered her family life during this time as happy with a positive relationship with both of her parents and her brother.
During this time, she showed a proclivity for art, which her parents and teachers remarked was advanced for a child her age.
Hale denied suffering any emotional or physical abuse during this period.
No records have been found to counteract her claims.
So this is all kind of weird, right?
She goes and shoots up this school, but in her own writing, she's like, that was the happiest time of my life at that school.
I had no problems.
I was not bullied.
So where did it go wrong?
Well, it went wrong when she reached fifth grade.
She transferred to Cresswell Middle, a magnet school for the arts, and remained there until she completed her eighth grade year.
The transfer was done to allow Hale to produce artistic interest.
Once she arrived at Crestwell, she encountered a culture shock.
While most of her classmates at Covenant were predominantly white and came from the middle class and wealthy households, most of her classmates at Crestwell Middle were predominantly from minority groups and came from working class households.
Hale remarked it wasn't long before other students began to pick on her and even bully her, believing she was a rich white girl and worthy of derision.
Though Hale's academics didn't appear to struggle mightily during this period, she began to feel socially ostracized, which led to lowering her self-esteem and self-confidence.
And it's also why she chose not to shoot up Cresswell Middle School, because she didn't want people to think that it was racially motivated why she did.
Meaning that it was racially motivated why she did what she did.
So again, it's just it to me is just like an example of just the The outcome of mentally weak people in a world designed not just to hate them, to get them to hate themselves, and to take out their anger and fury at being mistreated on people just like them.
Wow, folks, I never would have recognized my guest.
Welcome back, folks.
You're watching American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
So happy to be welcoming you back to the show once again.
Mr. Jeremy Brown, he is a proud father, former small business owner, and a decorated U.S. Army Special Forces combat veteran who served over 20 years in the U.S. military.
Jeremy is an America First Patriot who has challenged the Democratic establishment in Florida when he ran for Congress in 2020.
To this day, he still fights for the promises of our forefathers'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
You can follow Jeremy Brown on X at Free Jeremy Brown.
You can also contribute to his defense by going to the website JeremyBrownDefense.com.
And, of course, the website WhoIsJeremyBrown.com to get an explanation of who Mr.
Jeremy Brown is and how he was treated by our federal government, federal government, that he pledged his life to serve, who turned around and tried to basically blackmail him into becoming an informant.
When he refused, they tried to destroy his life.
Well, it's good to see you, Harrison.
jeremy brown
It's good to speak to you on something other than a jail phone.
So we will not be interrupted by the rude woman telling us time warnings every 15 minutes.
So I can assure you that.
harrison smith
Man, how does it feel?
How does it feel to know that it all turned out all right?
I mean, what you've been through is horrific.
not to downplay it, but there's a very real possibility Kamala Harris could have won and you'd be just beginning to serve the utterly ludicrous sentence that they were trying to foist on you.
I mean, how are you feeling today?
unidentified
Well, you know, I took...
jeremy brown
You know, 40 days and I didn't pay attention to any news.
I didn't listen to much conservative radio or just listen to music.
And to be honest, it's bittersweet because while it was a horrific experience, it is great to be out.
But, you know, it doesn't change the fact of why I was incarcerated.
Or what happened to America or what is still happening to America.
So I would love to continue not paying attention to anything.
I would love to continue spending time with my mom and my new girlfriend and in our new home and our new city and with our new lives.
But unfortunately, you know, it's like from the Godfather.
I keep trying to get out, but it keeps pulling me back in.
It is bittersweet because things that I never expected to happen when I was released have happened.
And I won't get into many of the details.
But, you know, it's like, I mean, bittersweet is the best way to describe it.
Because I watch for the first time, I see some of the J6ers, their faces.
I see some of the people that I've interviewed with.
And I've jokingly told my new girlfriend it.
That punch does not look anything like what I thought they would look like in my own mind.
And, you know, I see everyone is kind of in this celebratory, you know, it's over mindset, and I just do not feel that way.
I mean, and it's one of the reasons why I've taken these 40 days because I don't want to give the impression that I think it's over because for me, it is not over.
harrison smith
Yeah, well, you know, I...
I sort of ask this to all of my friends that have gotten out of prison, Stuart Rhodes and others.
It's like, I wouldn't blame you in the slightest if you just moved to Aruba and spent the rest of your days on a beach just enjoying the sun and luxuriating in the fact that you're not in prison.
I wouldn't blame you in the slightest, but I don't think a single person that I know of has taken that route.
I mean, Enrique Tarrio, Joe Biggs, Stuart Rhodes, yourself, it's like, There's something about it that nobody is just going, well, I'm out, I'm leaving, I'm not going to mess with the government anymore.
Everybody seems to have come out of prison going, now I have a second chance to again fight for the principles I believe in and try to get this country back on track.
So, man, I wouldn't blame you in the slightest.
I've seen your RV set up.
It's very comfortable.
I wouldn't blame you if you just You know, I call it phase three of this operation.
jeremy brown
You know, the first phase was, you know, the targeting of me, you know, the attempted recruiting, the targeting of me.
The second phase was the false imprisonment.
And now third phase is my turn.
And then the fourth phase will be...
Correcting the mistakes that we've made over the last hundred years in this country that have put us in this situation.
And make no mistake, it is 100% our fault.
It's everyone that is listening to this broadcast.
It's everyone that walks on the earth that makes up the land that is America.
It is our fault.
We have no one to blame but ourselves and our own ignorance and our own complacency for...
Where we are today.
And that's why I say it's bittersweet, because not so much the J6ers, because I honestly haven't seen that many J6ers, but I've encountered quite a few, and it is very much a mentality of, you know, well, that season, and where, you know, everything has been fixed, but things haven't been fixed.
You know, it's kind of like the years that we waited on the John Durham, you know, Special prosecution, and then he comes out and claims that, you know, we do people accountable.
unidentified
It's like, hey, you're the guy that we're hired to hold accountable.
jeremy brown
So until there are people that replace us in the prison cells that we were all illegally held in, until the rents and the money have been followed to show who is responsible for January 6th, or at least...
The admission by this government that, oh my gosh, you're right, you're right, you're right, there was a military operation being executed against the American people, and that's what January 6th was.
Until these things happen, then I don't rest.
I mean, I can't speak for other J6s, and I don't expect people that just got caught up in the American Reichstag to...
To, you know, all of a sudden become, you know, special operators on the real league.
Yeah. And I don't appreciate, Harrison, you giving away possible, you know, evasion locations.
I have to make sure that one gets crossed off the list now because they'll be looking there now that you said it publicly.
harrison smith
I'm sorry.
unidentified
I'm sorry to give away your...
harrison smith
I know, but that's the beauty of the RV.
You could be anywhere.
You could be anywhere.
No, but yeah, I totally get what you mean.
And, you know, we've showed a video earlier today of Charlie Kirk debating somebody about the January Sixers.
And, you know, it's not over for the left either.
They're still pissed that everybody got out.
And if, you know, if they get back in the power, they're going to come after you again.
But before we get into any of that.
What is your status?
Because I know some people like Joe Biggs and Stuart Rhodes, they didn't receive the full pardon.
They received a commutation.
You took longer than just about anybody else to actually be released from prison.
I mean, what was it about your case that made it so difficult to come to a conclusion?
And are you fully pardoned or commuted?
And are you still having any problems legally with your situation?
jeremy brown
First, let me give you the update.
As of last week, in fact, April 2nd, which was Liberation Day, according to all the financial channels, sycophants in relation to tariffs, it was actually my Liberation Day because that was when Judge Maladay, the chief judge in the Middle District of Florida, ruled and issued the order that the request by the DOJ under 48A...
motion to basically overturn my conviction and dismiss the case and all indictments with prejudice actually became real.
So I got the call.
We had just had lunch at a local place, you know, my mom and my new girlfriend, and we were in the community.
I got the call from Michael Offerman, who was with me on the first thing that I did with Infowars.
And he told me that, you know, I was a free man, a free American citizen, which I refer to as semi-free because nothing really has been changed that much.
But, you know, so my case has finally been fully resolved.
I think the only thing outstanding is now for a motion to dismissal appeal.
But that concludes phase two.
Like I said, that concludes the false.
...conviction and the false incarceration phase of this operation.
Now, the least interesting thing, and I have some notes here, because what I have dealt with, other than, you know, I had people recognize me in public for the first time, so now I'm infamous, and if you know anything about the three Amigos, that just means that I'm leading famous, right? And so we've applied for a lease, and we've...
You know, gotten a new home and, you know, we're trying to get financial things straightened out, but a couple of things didn't even count, which made me believe that I've just been completely erased.
Now, some odd things.
The first thing was I signed up for TruthFinder, which is a background check system, you know, civilian offer.
It's usually pretty good and a lot of people use it to find some phone numbers because I've lost a lot of the contacts to old friends and things like that during my, you know, three plus years.
I'm not in Truthfinder.
Even though I had a family connection, even though I've saved, you know, 1,245 days in federal custody, there is not only not a criminal background on me on this Truthfinder site, but there's no...
I think.
In fact, I took a picture of him.
I wish I would have provided you, but it basically says, no report found.
Meaning, they don't even have a social security number for a guy named Jeremy Brown in Tampa.
Although, I do come up, but when you click on view the report, it says no report found for this report has been made.
So that's wrong.
When we applied for our lease, they did a background check.
And of course, I preemptively told the leasing agent, the real estate agent, who's actually a very...
A high-level agent in this area.
We had some great conversation, but I told him all the time, I said, I want you to know, because I know these background checks are legitimate background checks, and that it would come up, and I said, I want you to know that it's going to show that I am a convicted felon, but here is all the documentation.
Here's my presidential pardon proclamation certificate, and here are the court rulings.
She told me just the other day, she goes, Jeremy, it didn't come up in your background check.
Nothing came up.
And because I told her the story, she says, you know, I didn't bring it up.
You know, we ran the background check, nothing negative came up.
And then there's...
So I made a credit card on my account, and I actually text with their support staff.
They didn't...
I'm giving all my information and their two-factor authentication will not work on me.
Even though they send me the text message, when I go to enter the code, it says two-factor authentication found.
And then there's Fidelity Investments.
Fidelity Investments has had a Jeremy Brown Roth IRA account for nearly three decades.
So I go into Fidelity Investments and I say, hey, I'd like to reset my internet access to my account.
And the manager at the branch office, Where we're located came out and said, this account is closed and it will never be allowed to be open.
And so when we asked, well, why is it closed?
All they said was, well, you violated our terms of service and we don't have to tell you why.
And I said, okay, well, who can I talk to?
And they said, there's no one you can talk to.
unidentified
I haven't seen anybody that you can talk to.
jeremy brown
You can call me and ask for my number, but I'm going to tell you right now that we're not going to ever meet in your town again.
So if you have your Roth IRA or any investments with Fidelity, I'm actually hoping to raise enough money to pay you to leave Fidelity Investments.
I will give you more than enough.
Once I reestablish that 401k, I will give you who I will be running any brokerage or investment accounts with.
But clearly, the company that has the on-scene logo are just a bunch of scumbags, and you should not do any business with them.
And hopefully I'll be able to raise enough money through my continued donations and my legal defense fund.
And hopefully some victorious lawsuits that I'll be able to pay you to move the money to anyone.
Although I wouldn't recommend Robinhood because they're also a bunch of scumbags.
harrison smith
Yeah, well, scumbags abound in that particular industry.
But so that's crazy.
It's still something.
jeremy brown
I mean, it's not a lot of money, but because of the divorce.
But it's still sitting there, and they're like, you can bring me out, but you can't invest it.
You can't do anything with the account.
You are permanently blocked and banned, and that ban will never be left.
harrison smith
Yeah, that seems to me like it should be a major story.
I mean, you're talking about debanking somebody for being convicted of a crime.
I mean, that doesn't happen with rapists and murderers.
Why is it happening with you?
And they won't even tell you.
What aspect of the terms of service you broke?
I mean, that just literally doesn't make any sense.
Like I said, I mean, murderers and rapists, serial killers can still have bank accounts, but you can't.
jeremy brown
Well, and we know that it is directly tied to January 6th because the only reason that we found out about this was that my ex-girlfriend attempted to establish Fidelity as the brokerage account for our legal defense fund because I...
have advised that those funds be put into a brokerage account so that they're at least while they're sitting there to be given to loans who typically don't do their jobs, they'll at least be gaining some type of interest where we can invest in income generating investments.
And so we were looking at switching from a less friendly, user-friendly platform to Fidelity, which I was much as possible with their and during that During that question-answer period, it was mentioned that this trust fund was for a legal defense fund tied to January 6th, and that is the moment when they banned the account.
And so, yeah.
harrison smith
Well, hopefully we can get some attention on that, because that is very disturbing.
I mean, it seems like a pretty severe violation of what should be their ethical controls.
So that's very disturbing.
What would you say?
I don't know how you'd put it, but you said you took 40 days just not paying attention to anything.
So I don't know, you might not even have an opinion on this, but what would you say if you could talk to Donald Trump?
What do you think he should be pursuing right now?
What do you think should be on the top of his priority list?
jeremy brown
What I would say to President Trump is, first of all, you know, thank you for the pardon.
However, I would then go into the exact same thing that I've been saying for, you know, three plus years.
I would explain that what has happened to J6ers and what happened on J6 and what led to J6 is all part of an unconventional, unrestricted warfare campaign targeted at...
America. Not the federal government.
The federal government are the operatives of this campaign.
It is funded against the American people.
And that's exactly what happened.
And this is why I never hold anything against Jay Sixers, okay?
Yeah, even if I had a conversation with Ray Epps, I might even forgive him or any of the other actors that have clearly been just like any other patsy.
In this type of operation, right?
Because people don't understand what happened on January 6th.
They don't understand the mechanisms, the tactics, techniques, and procedures that went into it.
But that's what I have to explain to the president.
unidentified
You know, this isn't a political issue, okay?
jeremy brown
And this will happen to the left, just like it will be to the right.
unidentified
And this is the reporting, the original opinion that I exposed, the agents even say, hey, when we did this, the left is we.
jeremy brown
We immediately survived in a temporary plan to spy on Americans illegally.
unidentified
Right? So this is not a political issue.
jeremy brown
This is an anti-American versus American issue.
It is a good versus evil issue.
It is a right versus wrong issue.
And so, you would do nothing more than tell the president directly the exact same things that I've been telling the American people directly, which is all the details, all the circumstantial evidence, all the hard evidence that this was a clandestine and compartmentalized operation run by elements, rogue elements.
Within our federal government, at all levels, whether it be law enforcement, whether it be the military, whether it be Congress, no matter what, the judiciary, I mean, look at some of the rulings that came out over the, you know, four-year-plus period of January 6th, and all these cases, completely absurd rules.
Complete violations.
And the reason is because they don't even do this.
harrison smith
100%. And I mean, the craziest thing about it is that this sort of, this deep state activity is still very much going on.
I want to get your take on this clip number 14. This is Adam Schiff.
Again, sort of exposing exactly what you're talking about, that the deep state is still, to this day, at war with the American people and the duly elected American president.
Here's Adam Schiff, and I want to get Jeremy Brown's take on the other side.
Let's watch.
adam schiff
Extraordinary step of convening this unprecedented hearing.
We brought together both chambers of Congress, the Senate and the House, to conduct real oversight and to serve as a check and balance to hold those who misuse power to account and to...
Carry out our constitutional duty.
Convening this hearing was not our first choice.
We have tried to get our Republican colleagues to hold hearings, to do meaningful oversight, to assert Congress's authority as an independent branch of government.
But to our great disappointment, our Republican colleagues have abdicated that important responsibility.
They have stood by as the President has run roughshod over the legislative branch and turned Congress into little more than a rubber stamp.
So today we'll hold the first of what we hope will be more bicameral oversight hearings.
We will do the investigative work that our colleagues across the aisle refuse to do.
We will expose the illegality, abuse, and corruption of this administration and within the Department of Justice.
We will have brave witnesses speak to what's actually happening behind closed doors, how the Trump administration continues to try to intimidate them from speaking out, and why it matters to Americans across the country.
The Trump administration is following a well-worn playbook.
History serves as a guide and as a warning.
In the 1930s, a Jewish lawyer in Berlin tracked in meticulous detail how Germany gradually became what he called a dual state.
First to keep the country running, the ordinary legal system remained in place for most people.
And yet, step by step, a parallel system of governance and law emerged, what one scholar called a lawless zone.
A parallel system carry out the will of the leader and to go after his enemies real or perceived.
To punish, to reward, to co-opt.
To intimidate, silence, or take over institutions that make a society free and vibrant.
The courts, the lawyers, the universities, the press, even businesses.
And over time, I'm going to go to the next episode.
harrison smith
I mean, what do we need to do to rein these people in, Jeremy?
jeremy brown
First of all, it's prevention.
I mean, the left, and I don't even like calling it the left because it's not the left, okay?
We have tried for years to get Republicans.
I mean, you haven't seen me testify on the floor of Congress, and yet I'm the only Jay Sixer who has an actual recording of them attempting to recruit me before January 6th.
I'm the only Jay Sixer that, you know, I'm the only Jay Sixer who's been released with things, right, because of illegal violations of the Fourth Amendment.
...
unidentified
And so why are Republicans?
jeremy brown
I mean, I've seen a couple documentaries.
Devin Soney, who I'm going to be on the show with next after following you, has done some wonderful documentaries with Trinus Evans.
unidentified
And, you know, they're leading the drum.
jeremy brown
Politicians will go on their documentaries and politicians will go on Laura Logan's documentaries and they'll talk about all the things that they've seen and how, okay, well, what are the hearings?
Where are the criminal referrals?
Where is, look, we're right now in communication with the Judiciary Committee, of which we've been in communication with for years, and they're just now saying, I don't sense what you're having to take a look at.
harrison smith
Yeah, I completely agree.
And I mean, we saw the way the Democrats had that completely ludicrous January 6th committee hearings.
That was just a total kangaroo court absurdity.
But hey, if that's the game they want to play, then we need to be having our own.
We need to have our own January 6th committee with Jeremy Brown and all the other victims of this state oppression up there testifying to what they experienced.
And we need you in office.
I think you should run for office again.
Jeremy Brown at FreeJeremyBrown on X. JeremyBrownDefense.com.
Who is Jeremy Brown?
Thank you so much for joining us, Jeremy.
We'll talk to you again very soon, I'm sure.
jeremy brown
Thank you, Harrison.
unidentified
And I will be running from office as fast as I can.
harrison smith
Oh, no, Mom, darn it!
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
InfoWars.com forward slash go.
alex jones
Methylene blue is all the rage.
But for my listeners, we've been talking about it for decades.
But finally, they've got factories.
They've got laboratories that are producing medical, pharmaceutical, USP grade.
And so, our sponsor, TheAlexJonesStore.com, has it right now.
The very highest quality.
And I've taken USP grade before, and they claim it's USP grade, and it works great.
Massive energy, clarity, focus, don't let down.
This is 10 times better?
I'm actually scared of this.
Because I've seen Robert F. Kennedy Jr. take three droppers in Air Force One.
I took half a dropper and I'm bouncing off the walls hours later.
Ladies and gentlemen, we have the very best methylene blue I've ever had at the lowest price and it funds the info war.
A total 360 win.
Export Selection