Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
A lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress. | |
| Where I just can't... | ||
| I'm trying to connect the dots of how did they become rich while earning... | ||
| How'd they get 20 million if they're earning 200,000 a year? | ||
| It sounds... | ||
| Nobody can explain that. | ||
| So something's... | ||
| Yeah, we're gonna try to figure it out and... | ||
| And certainly stop it from happening. | ||
| That was an extremely bold and quite frankly courage-filled statement yesterday in Wisconsin by Elon Musk. | ||
| He's not only exposing the millions and millions of Social Security numbers willfully given to illegal aliens so they can vote, so they can get benefits, so they can do fraudulent tax rebate checks, but That if you look at the Democrats particularly, but it's some Republicans like Mitch McConnell's they get into office with no money AOC and end up with tens of millions even hundreds of millions of Dollars and the worst offenders of insider trading and all sorts of other corruption are the Democrats So now they've been cutting off the US | ||
| aid money The CIA uses covertly they've been cutting off the EPA money They found the 375 billion that Podesta secretly grabbed not just 20 billion. | ||
| It gets worse by the day and now he's saying hey How do these people get into office with nothing, end up being fabulously rich? | ||
| Well, we know how. | ||
| Incredible levels of corruption. | ||
| Everything you saw with the Biden crime family and the way they did it is the exact same way the Democrats have been doing it, and they are the grand champions of it. | ||
| The Republican Party's been warmongering in the past, evil, corrupt, has major problems, but if you study them throughout history, the Democratic Party are the original party from the start of the country, They know where the bodies are buried, and I'd say 90% of the outrageous corruption we see from them. | ||
| It is just amazing. | ||
| We've seen Lindsey Graham and John McCain's foundation with Senator Cotton, you know, being on the board and getting massive amounts of taxpayer money themselves as part of the Ukraine war. | ||
| So that goes on. | ||
| But still, they are junior, junior, junior, junior, junior partners in this. | ||
| And a lot of that is because the Democrats Even when Republicans get in, have their people in the Justice Department. | ||
| And if a Republican has a crooked toenail, unless they're a neocon or a warmonger, they get indicted for even small-level corruption, but not the Democrats. | ||
| They've literally had a license to steal, and now Elon Musk is coming out and is taking a wrecking ball of that. | ||
| And he understands, and so does Trump. | ||
| There have got to be prosecutions of people at every level, including at the highest levels, because the Democrats are going to do what they've done. | ||
| Financing, it's on record Brazil to take Bolsonaro off the ballot, not let him run and then indict him for made up stuff. | ||
| Marie Le Pen, the great populist patriot, has been convicted by a judge of embezzlement. | ||
| She's been stripped off the ballot so she can't run. | ||
| And of course, she's ahead to win the presidency and all the polls by massive numbers. | ||
| They've arrested and done the same stuff to the guy that won Killeen Projescu in Romania. | ||
| Now they're talking about doing it in Poland and Germany. | ||
| They're literally outlawing their political opposition. | ||
| That's what they tried with Trump, taking him off the ballot. | ||
| The Supreme Court had to intervene. | ||
| All the law fairs, they tried with me. | ||
| They're trying it with Musk because they want to get you. | ||
| So Musk is absolutely right. | ||
| This is the highest stakes political poker there is, as I saw Owen Schroyer say earlier today. | ||
| And all of us that have pledged to bring back the Republic have pledged our names, our treasure, our treasure. | ||
| So I want to thank all the viewers and listeners that understand that Trump, Musk, myself, and others that are under the most attack is because we're the most effective, we've got the globalist number, and we're reaching so many people. | ||
| Obviously, I'm way junior to Trump and Musk, and that's fine. | ||
| This is a dangerous position to be in. | ||
| But we are just right down there, third under them, for reaching the most people with the most hardcore information. | ||
| That's why I need your support at our great sponsor. | ||
| RealAlexJones.com, where a lot of exclusive items, like the highest quality USP, that means pharmaceutical grade, methylene blue, ultra blue, has sold out. | ||
| It's on a waiting list at theAlexJonesStore.com, but they held some back at RealAlexJones.com, and so much more at RealAlexJones.com. | ||
| That's how you keep us on the air. | ||
| Believe me, you will thank me when you try this methylene blue. | ||
| What it does would take hours to get into, but it is just game changing when RFK Jr. talks about it, and this is. | ||
| The very best. | ||
| There's a lot of other great items like the trench knife. | ||
| That's so amazing. | ||
| That's sold out of the auction store dot com. | ||
| It's at relax shows dot com right now. | ||
| And so much more. | ||
| So thank you so much for your support. | ||
| Keep us in the fight. | ||
| We're fighting together and I can't do it without you saw respectfully again. | ||
| Ask for your support at Rolex shows dot com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Tuesday, April 1st in the year of our Lord 2025. | |
| And you're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| I think it's time to blow this scene. | ||
| Get everybody in the stuff together. | ||
| Okay, three, two, one, let's jam. | ||
| I'm going to go. | ||
| We are inundated with propaganda fabricating one engineered New World Order crisis directive after another. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Musk announced the decision after conducting an online poll. | |
| He tweeted, quote, the people have spoken. | ||
| Amnesty begins next week. | ||
| You know, the Russians are waiting for something like this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They need a propaganda campaign against the United States and against our support for Ukraine. | |
| And they're going to be all over Twitter. | ||
| I guarantee this. | ||
| Supporting the far right. | ||
| Phase 2 of Operation Lockstep calls for more 5G radiation to affect the immune system of the public combined with the heavy metals found in the vaccines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This video clip is an example of the phenomenon using pendulum oscillators of different phases on a common platform suddenly sync up given enough time. | |
| Toxic symptoms information can be transmitted to and from individuals or the group very efficiently, even if they move away from the initial source. | ||
| The bodies of the injected provide the electrical power, like a battery, to continue resonating these fields, effectively turning them into wireless repeaters or routers. | ||
| We're witnessing lethal damage by EMF irradiation. | ||
| The more graphene oxide, the greater the damage. | ||
| The contagion is not a contagion because there is no pathogen. | ||
| Other early signs of Phase 2 within human civilization, there will be an increase of military checkpoints. | ||
|
unidentified
|
These signs, either side of the road, with the red in between, painted on the road, are showing up all around the exit roads to the main townships in the Tablelands. | |
| And this is the base. | ||
| It can be changed into a roadblock. | ||
| And more large-scale food shortages which will force people to only be able to access essential products or services if they are awarded permission. | ||
| Crushing discrimination against dissenters by corporations and banks. | ||
| And the implementation of central bank digital currencies. | ||
| The World Economic Forum is pushing for a global ID by 2026, fueled by blaming the average citizen for their carbon footprint. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why is the World Economic Forum... | |
| Bothering with digital identity. | ||
| Why are we looking into it? | ||
| Why is it such an important topic for us? | ||
| How we construct and use digital identities would determine how people are represented online, what opportunities they have access to, what or who is trusted online. | ||
| So it's also a very important tool for financial inclusion. | ||
| It's a starting point where a number of actors, you know, from the international development community and the private sector and everything in between have started to come together to think about what principles should be governing that. | ||
| Yep. Not a word from the Bilderberg attending industries that continue to produce endocrine system hormone blockers within phthalates and bisphenol A in plastics to pesticides in our food, to shampoo, to receipts, to water bottles, to electronics, to cleaning products and carpets. | ||
| Regardless of the fact that the chemicals from these industries could wipe out the human race by 2045, as leading reproductive epidemiologist Shanna Swan and her team of researchers from When did this stuff start getting into our food supply? | ||
| The growth of these chemicals tracks with the growth of The petrochemical industry. | ||
| So, back in 1950, there's this better living through chemistry that everyone's talking about, and everybody is just wanting everything made of plastic. | ||
| That's just one example of the many chemicals that can affect our hormone system. | ||
| And they must be stopped before Phase 3 results in the release of a weaponized SARS-HIV-MERS virus that could make a nuclear war look like sympathy. | ||
| Alright folks, that is the latest from John Bowne. | ||
| Find and share it at Infowars.com. | ||
| Bandod video, Operation Lockstep lurks in the shadows. | ||
| And it's hard to overstate the number of threats that we're facing and it's a little bit frustrating knowing that there's so much going on that's not being confronted and that's being allowed to persist because we're being distracted by a whole bunch of other insane things. | ||
| And yes, Today's topic of the day is, once again, World War III, as we seem to be inching ever closer to the cusp, to the edge of the abyss, and the ultimate betrayal of Donald Trump. | ||
| He actually does go to war with Iran. | ||
| War in the Middle East. | ||
| I was just listening to... | ||
| I was just listening to an explanation. | ||
| As to how Donald Trump could serve a third term, caveats or loopholes in the 22nd amendment. | ||
| And I was thinking, well, for one thing, he's got to earn it. | ||
| For one thing, he's got to actually finish out this term as a success for us to want another one, which would mean not going to war in the Middle East. | ||
| But then there's a, there's a little trick. | ||
| There's like a cheat code that's just been discovered. | ||
| It's called the the Zelensky loophole and it's if you declare war then you can be a dictator and it's fine. | ||
| It's very convenient and so I guess that's the the choice Trump has to make is do you want to avoid war and be a president that people want to having a third term or do you want to go Zelensky style, declare war, declare that you can't have elections until the war is over, never let the war end and be a dictator for life. | ||
| I guess I guess that's one little loophole. | ||
| That's one workaround for the 22nd Amendment. | ||
| But he's got to avoid war first. | ||
| And I know a lot of people are, you know, still sort of pushing the argument like, this is all negotiation tactic. | ||
| I saw somebody yesterday, I think it was Drago something on on X, but he was publishing all these headlines from Trump's first term. | ||
| Where it was like Trump threatens North Korea, Trump threatens Russia, Trump threatens all these people. | ||
| You know, pointing to that and going, look, this is what Trump does. | ||
| He threatens people. | ||
| But it's all actually in the pursuit of peace. | ||
| And like, that's fine. | ||
| But we're being set up for another Pearl Harbor. | ||
| We're being set up for a false flag attack. | ||
| Not even necessarily a false flag attack. | ||
| Just instigating conflict with Iran. | ||
| And then of course, how easy would it be for Iran or somebody else in the Middle East to blow up a warship, blame it on Iran, and kick the war off that way. | ||
| I know what you're thinking. | ||
| I've seen this one before. | ||
| And yeah, no, it didn't work in 1967, but doesn't mean they won't try again. | ||
| So we have China. | ||
| Don't know if you guys saw what China's up to. | ||
| I'm kind of confused at what China's up to. | ||
| Like, I don't know if there's ever been a situation like this. | ||
| I was trying to think back in history. | ||
| You have this country of Taiwan that is independent for all intents and purposes, right? | ||
| It signs its own agreements. | ||
| It has security guarantees with America. | ||
| It's not really in China. | ||
| But China just insists that it is China. | ||
| And I mean, I guess the analog in history would be Hong Kong or or any other number of, you know, smaller countries on the periphery of China that China basically blob, like a giant meat-eating blob of some sort. | ||
| And that would be the way that I'm sure China would prefer to take Taiwan, sort of in the way that they did with Hong Kong by doing some sort of security agreement with them and then censoring anti-China activity, crush any opposition, and just fold it democratically into China through the vote process. | ||
| I'm sure they'd rather do that. | ||
| But the fact that you have this giant country, China, routinely surrounding Taiwan with aircraft and ships and then coming out and saying, We're practicing for the blockade that we're going to do. | ||
| We're just practicing for the war that we're going to launch. | ||
| We're just practicing, you know, in the area where we're actually going to wage war. | ||
| China launches military drills around Taiwan, calls its president a parasite. | ||
| Okay, very nice. | ||
| It just seems weird to me. | ||
| It's like, okay, either go to war or don't. | ||
| What is this? | ||
| What is this like constantly surrounding, like every month or so, they're surrounding Taiwan with warships and planes saying, yeah, we're just practicing. | ||
| Just practicing for our invasion. | ||
| We're going to carry it out later. | ||
| Not right now. | ||
| Don't worry about it. | ||
| Just be on your toes because it is coming. | ||
| We are going to dominate you. | ||
| We are going to fold you forcibly, you know, into our country. | ||
| Just not now. | ||
| Cool. Don't worry about it. | ||
| We're just practicing. | ||
| Just getting everything in order. | ||
| Testing your reaction times. | ||
| It's very weird how they do that over and over again. | ||
| But clearly they are making very big moves. | ||
| Russia now is getting into it with Iran. | ||
| Russia warns of catastrophic consequences if US strikes Iran. | ||
| Russia has warned the U.S. | ||
| that any military attack on Iran's nuclear sites would have catastrophic effects. | ||
| Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov calls for peaceful negotiations. | ||
| Russia warns the U.S. | ||
| against attacking Iran's nuclear sites. | ||
| U.S. threats may escalate tensions, says Russia's Deputy FM Foreign Minister. | ||
| Moscow offers to mediate between U.S. | ||
|
unidentified
|
and Iran. | |
| This comes after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to bomb Iran unless the country comes to an agreement with Washington on its nuclear activities. | ||
| Speaking in an interview with International Affairs Journal, Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov raised concerns over the issue. | ||
| He stressed that threats and ultimatums will increase tension. | ||
| Threats are indeed being heard. | ||
| Ultimatums are also being heard, Ryabkov said. | ||
| We consider such methods inappropriate. | ||
| We condemn them. | ||
| We consider them as a way for the U.S. to impose its own will on the Iranian side. | ||
| In spite of current tensions, Russia has refrained from directly criticizing U.S. presidents, said Moscow has left its diplomatic aspirations intact. | ||
| They've already indicated readiness to act as a mediator between the U.S. and Iran after the Strategic Partnership Treaty with Iran was signed in January. | ||
| So yes, Trump threatened Iran unless Iran agrees with Washington on the nuclear program. | ||
| Iran, meanwhile, said that they're not interested in direct negotiations and has apparently targeted Diego Garcia, the base nearby, not nearby, just out there in the Indian Ocean, for destruction because it's Diego Garcia, | ||
| that base, that has the only B-52 stratospheric Jets that can deliver, you know certain high payload nuclear weaponry and so Iran is just like sending a signal to America going well tell you what you want to try to bomb us or threaten us with nukes which they have and we went over yesterday how there's These bombing raids that they're running in conjunction with Israel using b-52s | ||
| not because they're necessary for the bombing runs that are actually being carried out but because they're a A signal to Iran that these are the planes we use to drop nuclear bombs. | ||
| Look how close we can get to Iran and drop these bombs. | ||
| So they've been sending those signals and Iran is sending the signal, okay, if you want to make those threats, then we want it known that we can obliterate Diego Garcia in an afternoon with ballistic hypersonic missiles that you can't track, let alone stop. | ||
| So yeah tensions ratcheting up so again even if this is a Negotiation tactic of Trump even if this is just a maximum pressure campaign try to get concessions from Iran What is to stop the conflict from breaking out regardless of Trump's design? | ||
| what would happen if Iran hit Diego Garcia or if Israel sunk a ship and blamed it on Iran or if Israel attacks Iran Iran lets loose Retaliates against not only Israel, but America as well. | ||
| Then we're into this giant conflict and Yeah, all signs are pointing in that direction again. | ||
| I Am being a little bit vague about it, but I do have People with sources in the Pentagon telling me that it's going to be this week that Israel is going to attack and actually the latest rumor is that the American CENTCOM commander Michael Carrillo ... is now meeting with Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir in an underground military bunker... | ||
|
unidentified
|
... | |
| Kyria in Tel Aviv. | ||
| Megatron posting this, saying things are about to get serious. | ||
| So, US CENTCOM commander... | ||
|
unidentified
|
... | |
| is in some sort of underground military bunker... | ||
|
unidentified
|
... | |
| with the Israeli Chief of Staff... | ||
|
unidentified
|
... | |
| plotting, planning, designing World War III against the wishes of everyone on Earth. | ||
| So so Trump wants to run for a third Third administration, I would say the number one thing he could do is not get us into yet another senseless stupid war in the Middle East and I would even go so far as to not open up the possibility of war in the Middle East because clearly We're being we're being set up for a false flag attack, | ||
| that's Would be extremely dangerous But again, that's just it's just World War three and We could get more into all of that a little bit later. | ||
| I do have a Bunch of just crazy stories here. | ||
| I'm sure everybody heard There hasn't been too much updated since yesterday afternoon, but Epstein victim and Prince Andrew accuser Virginia Jew free or I think it's how you pronounce it has days to live after car wreck and Which yeah, I don't know if I've ever heard of something like this I mean usually if It's a car wreck and somebody dies sort of an outright thing or they're so injured. | ||
| There's in critical condition and You know it doesn't take long or maybe they go into a coma or something but apparently This woman was hit by a school bus going like a hundred miles an hour and It's completely insane in and of itself. | ||
| Then she's in the hospital and is like, my kidneys are failing. | ||
| I only have four days to live. | ||
| I've never heard of anything like that. | ||
| That's just... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I guess that's a thing. | ||
| I guess that's possible. | ||
| Just a lot of bizarre occurrences here. | ||
| A school bus going 100 miles an hour. | ||
| A little bit strange. | ||
| Crashing into this woman, all of this of course happening as the drama about Epstein continues to unfold. | ||
| It's been like five weeks or something since Pam Bondi said the documents would be released. | ||
| Since then we've heard about truckloads of documents and we heard about a thousand FBI agents pouring through the documents. | ||
| I just don't believe any of this. | ||
| I'm sorry to be skeptical here, but like What could they possibly be doing? | ||
| What could a thousand FBI agents possibly be spending their time on these documents for five weeks? | ||
| Three weeks, however long. | ||
| A thousand FBI agents working 40 hours a week. | ||
| What are they doing? | ||
| It really doesn't make any sense. | ||
| So, the fact that they haven't released them yet. | ||
| Means that there are still remnants of this network In operation behind the scenes trying to stop the release from coming out You know wielding influence to prevent the releases coming out and possibly murdering the victims Again I don't have any proof to point to I'll just say When you hear | ||
| a school bus is going 100 miles an hour and slams right into one of the few public and acknowledged victims of Jeffrey Epstein, I think it's worth asking a few questions. | ||
| Asking a few questions about this. | ||
| Again, we can bring you more reports on that a little bit later, but we're at the point now where I think we just kind of have to assume that nothing is as it seems. | ||
| I know that there's still a remnant or a portion of the population that's still in this mindset that it's like dangerous to question things. | ||
| I hope we all recognize we have moved beyond. | ||
| We should all have moved beyond that point to the point where absolutely nothing that we hear in the official story should be taken at face value. | ||
| Absolutely everything should be Just assume to be some sort of gigantic lie, some sort of gigantic scheme, probably just part of a much larger, you know, act of treason. | ||
| And then, you know, if it turns out that it's all in the up and up, then great. | ||
| But let's just start with the assumption. | ||
| When the accuser of Prince Andrew and the person pictured with him, one of the few public Epstein accusers almost dies in a frankly absurd set of circumstances. | ||
| I think we can just assume that there's a deep state activity in play and I'm gonna show some videos today. | ||
| If you remember Sarah Stock we had on because she was talking about xenophobic immigration policies in this A program called Jubilee I guess or it's called Surrounded and the company that puts it on is called Jubilee and the latest one is a doctor arguing with anti-vaxxers and I want to go through a couple clips from these debates because the doctor represents the mindset that I was just describing of just like | ||
| people still stuck in the paradigm of like don't ask questions, asking questions is dangerous, the system is good, The bureaucracy is unquestionable and skepticism is dangerous, if not a crime, if not an attack on your fellow Americans. | ||
| So I want to go to some of those videos. | ||
| I've compiled sort of some of the best ones, some of my favorite ones. | ||
| Of course, they don't always bring up the best people to argue. | ||
| It's actually kind of a brilliant setup for propaganda. | ||
| or interview. | ||
| And Charlie Kirk does it too at colleges where he sits up and you have a stream of people come up and ask questions and debate. | ||
| And yeah, it's an extremely effective propaganda tool to have one person that's like the authority that's sitting there that doesn't move. | ||
| That everybody else comes up and sits in front of and gets like a minute or two, like an audience with the Pope or something. | ||
| They get to go and they get to argue and then you pick up. | ||
| It's very well constructed. | ||
| It's very well-constructed to have the potential of propaganda. | ||
| I don't think it does. | ||
| I don't think it actually works though because the people debating the doctor, the doctor is very condescending and self-satisfied and just sort of comes across like a like a slime ball and the people arguing against him might not have a doctorate, might not have total command of the facts, but just simple basic common sense destroys so much of what the doctor says. | ||
| So I'm going to go to those videos In the next segment, stay with us. | ||
| A lot to cover today. | ||
| A lot of videos to show you. | ||
| Thank you for taking your calls as well. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| It's the American Journal, Infowars.com. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| We've got a lot to talk about today in terms of World War III, the invasion, and just so much more. | ||
| And we're planning to get to all of it. | ||
| But I'll take a moment to respond to some clips that have been going around going a little bit viral from this show I guess the show is called surrounded, but it's put on by this YouTube channel called Jubilee and It's a it's a pretty interesting setup that they have and I guess I recognize some of the people in this one from the last one about race where the big viral clip was Sarah Stock talking about the European roots of America and So | ||
| I see some of the same people coming up some of these people did really well regardless what you can see is a lot of the rhetorical trickery that's used to justify Unquestioning adherence to the medical industry And I think I mean the whole thing is A little bit nonsensical because of | ||
| what they did with the word vaccine. | ||
| Because they wanted to get everybody on mRNA technology. | ||
| And this isn't my speculation, like from their own words, from Anthony Fauci being like, we have this new technology, but it's going to be hard to get everybody to adopt it. | ||
| So we need some sort of big event to get people in a position where they're willing to try this experimental technology that's not a vaccine. | ||
| Doesn't work like a vaccine, doesn't work like a normal vaccine, doesn't vaccinate you, right, doesn't actually make you immune, doesn't actually stop you from getting or transmitting the... | ||
| So, I don't know, I don't know if they were like fully considering what the consequences would be of calling it a vaccine. | ||
| They wanted to adopt the vaccine label to sort of absorb the trust people have in vaccines and to Take advantage of the pre-existing bias against anti-vaxxers. | ||
| But what they've actually done is destroy the credibility of vaccines because everybody sees what a outrageous failure the COVID vax was. | ||
| And they lose trust in all vaccines. | ||
| So this doctor, like a lot of the issues that he's running into, I think is this idea that he's trying to defend vaccines. | ||
| Which technically include the COVID vaccine. | ||
| It works for them sometimes, but sometimes doesn't. | ||
| It's kind of like when they will be arguing against the Second Amendment, and they'll use stats where they'll have some giant number of death by guns, and they'll be like, that's why we have to get rid of assault rifles. | ||
| It's okay, but the stat you used was handguns. | ||
| So now using this stat, Go after assault rifles like yeah, they're technically guns, but you're you're being dishonest in the way that you're using the numbers. | ||
| It's sort of a It's sort of that it's sort of like they can go well vaccines have been used for hundreds of years and this vaccine is a vaccine so therefore it should absorb all of the All of the pre predisposition about vaccines from vaccines, but they're completely different things anyway The whole conversation is kind of nonsensical because they're talking about two completely different things But they have to use the same word to talk about them. | ||
| So So it all gets a little bit confusing, but let's go to some of these videos Let's go let's begin with clip number four this guy I think it's gets the best of the doctor and Again the doctors can kind of don't have a leg to stand on after kovat 19. You should be skeptical Can | ||
|
unidentified
|
I ask you a question in terms because as a vaccine skeptic the burden of proof is on you to show that vaccines do work. | |
| So what evidence would you have that vaccines actually work? | ||
| So, we have all stages of the vaccine process monitored because we are trying to do our best to make sure that we help children and adults when they are due for a vaccine. | ||
| Okay, so you just, at the end you said, it pretty much sounds like you have a good intention. | ||
| I'll probably be pausing a lot. | ||
| But you understand he didn't, that wasn't an answer to the question that was asked. | ||
| It's pretty much every question. | ||
| He's asked a question. | ||
| And he just sort of says this kind of blanket, almost like, you know, corporate HR speak response. | ||
| The guy's like, what evidence do you have that the vaccines work? | ||
| The guy's like, well, we monitor all parts of the vaccine because we care about people and we're doing our best. | ||
| It's like, that's not even close to an answer, actually. | ||
| That's not even remotely addressing the question at all, even a little bit, actually. | ||
| If you think about it, so, you'll notice that. | ||
| He practically never answers a question that's asked. | ||
| It's very weird. | ||
| It's very bizarre how this happens. | ||
| I mean, I can't imagine actually going to a doctor and having them answer like this for medical questions. | ||
| Is the tumor malignant? | ||
| He's just like, the tumor is, we're certainly going to monitor it with machines. | ||
| Okay, and like what does that what does that mean you're monitoring it? | ||
| Because it's malignant or because it's benign like what what do you mean you're just You have to give me an answer here. | ||
| You have to give me some sort of diagnosis prognosis You have to you have to answer the questions, so let's go back to this guy again. | ||
| Just did not answer the question instead just Asserted that actually the we are great guys. | ||
| We are great Remember, he sees himself as the member of a distinct community that he's defending. | ||
| It's not himself or his own personal participation in this. | ||
| It's the system that he is an avatar for when he says we. | ||
| So he didn't answer the question. | ||
| He has no... | ||
| The proof that vaccines work to him are because he's really trying hard, I guess. | ||
| Let's go back to the doctor, to Dr. Mike. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You just, at the end, you said it pretty much sounds like you have to have a good intention. | |
| For example, we're not in the labs actually seeing the vaccine process or the clinical trials, so we have to just take the expert's word and trust it, right? | ||
| Well, when you fly in a plane, you're not in the cockpit. | ||
| Right. So we put our faith in that. | ||
| So you would say that we just have to put our faith in the experts, correct? | ||
| Correct. Okay. | ||
| So this would require, number one, a good intention. | ||
| So they have a good intention to help people, to make their lives better, and also they have to be ethical. | ||
| Is that correct? | ||
| Those are reasonable things, yeah. | ||
| Okay, so if they fall outside of the purview of those two criteria, would you say it is reasonable for us to be skeptical? | ||
| I think it's reasonable to be skeptical at any moment. | ||
| But taking those two things, if they violate either of those two, would it give someone else more justification to be against it? | ||
| Sure. Okay, so when we look at the biggest developers and distributors and sellers of the vaccines, Pfizer, Johnson& Johnson, all these big pharmaceutical companies, when we look at their track record, we see they have been deceptive. | ||
| They've had, you know, big settlements, billions and billions of dollars, fraud, misleading the public, concealing clinical trials that were against their favor from the public. | ||
| So when we have to put our whole faith and trust in these people that have been through huge billions of dollars of settlements, and they have proven that they have been unethical, they have made more profit through the COVID times than ever before as well, why should we trust them so lightly? | ||
| Taking into consideration the fact that we're not in the labs with them, taking the fact that they are profiting from our well-being, why should we trust them so lightly? | ||
| It's not a blind trust. | ||
| Who you're trusting is the independent reviewers that review the data that they put forward. | ||
| Okay, but is this political or is this science? | ||
| Health is as much public health as it is individual health. | ||
| Okay, but would you say guys like Dr. Peter McCullough or Dr. Rich, would you say that they are probably not good experts that we should adhere to? | ||
| I don't know who those people are. | ||
| So they're very anti-vax or they've provided solutions like hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and they've stated over 200 peer-reviewed studies from different types of trials showing the efficacy of those kind of medications that are alternatives to COVID or the vaccination. | ||
| Um, but what I'm, what I'm kind of getting to is that we're supposed to trust this specific agenda. | ||
| So Pfizer, um, WHO, which once again, if we look at the track record, they haven't had a great track record. | ||
| So it sounds like to me, it's more of a political thing instead of a science thing. | ||
| When you guys say trust the science and trust the experts, you actually mean this group of experts. | ||
| Because whenever big experts like RFK, even if you want to say he's not a doctor, he's not licensed, but his friends, Peter McCullough, um, uh, Dr. Rich, they are great experts. | ||
| They've had some of the most reviewed studies, uh, in the medical field. | ||
| I don't see why we have to deny their science and their expertise and go with this set of people. | ||
| I think when you look at the grand scheme of things, you have to look at consensus. | ||
| Yeah, it's consensus. | ||
| And we control the consensus. | ||
| Anybody who contradicts our consensus, we silence. | ||
| So therefore, the consensus can remain the consensus. | ||
| There's some... | ||
| I mean, there's really nothing you can say to that guy because he's exactly right. | ||
| Whoever the the not not the doctor was and I recognize him from the previous one and he did a good job there too because he just sort of Goes at it logically Because okay, you want us to trust these people But here's all the ways they've proved. | ||
| They're untrustworthy. | ||
| So why should we trust them? | ||
| That's just like well, it's about consensus like great. | ||
| Okay, great No good points about consensus. | ||
| I didn't think about that now the It's it's sort of a constant Refrain from these people these types The system trusters Where they're like, well, you have to trust people every day you trust in the the pilot thing is sort of a constant example You you have to trust the pilot. | ||
| It's like okay, but the government isn't compelling me to fly and the government isn't providing for total secrecy and a settlement fund in the government We're good I | ||
| think? But he mentions WHO as well, | ||
| as being another force that you can recognize as not exactly with our best interest in mind, to say the very least. | ||
| And that is the, that's really at the heart of all of it, is these people get put into positions of power, they put themselves, they self-appoint themselves as authorities in the world on a certain thing, and then they utterly fail to uphold We're good to | ||
| go. And they do absolutely nothing about it for months and actually help to cover up the reality behind it. | ||
| They help to perpetuate the lies about it. | ||
| They see it not as a obligation or as a duty to, you know, actually fulfill the role that they have taken for themselves. | ||
| They instead see it as an opportunity to take advantage of the authority they've granted themselves to impose all sorts of controls that have nothing to do With the disease itself. | ||
| So not only should we not trust these people to actually do what they're supposed to because they've shown themselves to be utterly incompetent in that regard, but they're dangerous. | ||
| They're dangerous because when something like COVID-19 actually happens, their first concern is how do we utilize it? | ||
| How do we take advantage of it? | ||
| How do we use it to make money and reorganize the world so it looks more like our design? | ||
| They're willing to cover up for China. | ||
| They're willing to lie on behalf of China. | ||
| They're willing to lie to the extent that it allows the disease to spread even further and limits the ability we have to actually understand and therefore counteract the effects of the disease. | ||
| They impose lockdowns. | ||
| They start censoring everybody. | ||
| I mean, the censorship program all came out of the WHO. | ||
| It was coordinated in a global fashion by the WHO. | ||
| So not only are these people provably incompetent to do the thing they are supposed to be doing, but they willfully ignore their responsibility in order to take advantage of, politicize, and weaponize the issues that they're supposed to be confronting. | ||
| So when Pfizer hears that a big disease just popped out of nowhere, kind of a farmer's market in China, their first thought is how much money they can make with it, how they can utilize the disaster situation, the emergency declarations in order to get government compulsion to buy their products. | ||
| That's their first and major concern, to where if they have to do things or spread propaganda to increase the emergency situation, to increase the fear and outrage and control that the government then that's what they'll do. | ||
| If they have to bury things like ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, because otherwise you would lose the emergency use authorization. | ||
| If there's a viable treatment for a disease, you can't authorize the emergency use of a vaccine. | ||
| So they'll actually go out and stop people from getting medicine, because if the efficacy of the medicine was known, they wouldn't get their profit from the vaccine program that they're operating. | ||
| So it's not just that there's every reason not to trust these people. | ||
| It's just they've shown us time and time again, their first concern is not our health. | ||
| Our health maybe doesn't even crack the top 10 of their concerns when it comes to an emergent disease of some sort. | ||
| It's profit, control, consolidation, you know, censorship. | ||
| And somewhere down the line, they're like, oh, and we want to keep people healthy. | ||
| But. That's far from the top of their concerns. | ||
| Let's go to another example. | ||
|
unidentified
|
RFK Jr. is a public health threat. | |
| So why do you think he is a threat? | ||
| I think that RFK's stances of why he's a public health threat go past the anti-vaccine stances. | ||
| He's made public statements that HIV doesn't cause AIDS, that poppers, which is a party drug or a recreational drug that people use, is really the reason why AIDS exists. | ||
| That is not someone who Clearly understand science, and I don't want them in charge of a health agency. | ||
| Okay, assuming he does become head of the health department, wouldn't he now technically be considered the expert, not an expert, but the expert? | ||
| No. So then, if he put something forth that was anti-vax, and he said we have sufficient evidence to prove this, and then other medical experts such as you, which are pro-vax, went against it, wouldn't now you be categorized as the expert? | ||
| The wrong ones? | ||
| No, because it's not based on a single person's opinion. | ||
| This is a consensus-driven statement, driven by thousands of doctors, dozens of agencies, not just here in the United States, but worldwide as well. | ||
| Okay, do you allow your patients to write bad reviews about you if they had a bad experience? | ||
| It's not my choice to write it or not write it. | ||
| No, do you allow them? | ||
| Or would you remove it? | ||
| No. No what? | ||
| I would not remove it. | ||
| Okay, so if we look at Facebook, Google, YouTube, they suppressed so many anti-vax posts. | ||
| Legitimate declarations of they were injured, serious deaths. | ||
| ABC News went on Facebook and they posted a simple question. | ||
| Who do you know or yourself that was seriously injured from the vaccine? | ||
| Over 200,000 comments that were then removed by Facebook. | ||
| Mark Zuckerberg just went on Joe Rogan and he said that. | ||
| Joe Biden, the Biden administration forced them to censor people. | ||
| So if someone really believes in their product, why would they do mass censorship to hide it? | ||
| I'm a family medicine doctor. | ||
| I have no idea why they're censoring certain websites or not censoring certain websites. | ||
| Like, that's outside of my scope. | ||
| Well, that's outside of your scope, but just using logic, just using reasoning. | ||
| You said you would not remove your patients as bad reviews. | ||
| So why would we allow these experts to then remove those kind of Critics. | ||
| Last that I checked, no doctor removes patient bad reviews. | ||
| No doctor goes on and hides comments. | ||
| Why not? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Maybe they do it on an individual level, but not on a systemic level. | |
| Okay. I would just say that RFK Jr. does appeal to other experts that even if they're vaccine skeptics, they put forth legitimate studies that would be antithetical to the pro-vaccine studies. | ||
| So you said earlier, like misinformation, I would ask who is the author of misinformation? | ||
| Who is the author of misinformation? | ||
| Yeah, so misinformation, uh, first off, is predicated on the fact that there's a right information. | ||
| Right information is going to be predicated on the fact that there's absolute truth. | ||
| Does science state absolute truth? | ||
| There's no absolute truth, period. | ||
| So, if there's no absolute truth within this realm, I don't know why we should... | ||
| No absolute truth, period. | ||
|
unidentified
|
... | |
| rule out R.K. Jr. and the other experts that he could appeal to. | ||
| The reason I rule him out is because he takes information that is not true, like that paupers cause AIDS... | ||
| Subjectively true. | ||
| It's not subjectively true. | ||
| For the time being, because you just said it's provisional truth, meaning it can change with time. | ||
| Right, but you can create any sort of statement, and in healthcare, we can't just go off of any statement because someone feels subjectively to be true. | ||
| We have to do our best to do with limited information that we can. | ||
| Uh, yeah, no, great point, doctor. | ||
| So this is the problem, okay, okay, first of all, going back to Even the first clip and there he's talking about there We talked about dr. Peter McCullough. | ||
| He is the most published Like scientific author ever Or at least living. | ||
| I'm not sure. | ||
| I'm not sure if ever but more papers studied about the heart about You know medical issues than anybody else in the world. | ||
| So you talk about Experts this guy's like I've never even heard of Peter McCullough like yeah, we know like That's the thing. | ||
| It's not even necessarily like what he's saying. | ||
| It's just like what you can read between the lines. | ||
| He's never heard of Peter McCullough, despite the fact that the man is beyond imminent. | ||
| He is, again, the most published medical doctor ever. | ||
| And he also is probably the most prominent voice of the vaccine skeptics. | ||
| So, you know, this guy by, you know, making these flippant statements, he's like, I don't even know who those people are. | ||
| It's like, well, then it proves that you are literally blind to the other side of the argument. | ||
| You've never looked into the argument. | ||
| You've never researched the claims of the skeptics because you have no idea. | ||
| So here you are, you know, condescending to people. | ||
| You have literally only ever taken in information from one side of the argument. | ||
| So you're really, you know, revealing yourself there. | ||
| But also, if you are going to be condescending and talking down to people, It sort of puts you in a tough spot when you then later have to pretend to be stupid. | ||
| It doesn't really work. | ||
| You see, there's a major disconnect when, you know, he's the doctor, he's the expert, he's just the way he talks is very condescending and talking down to people. | ||
| And the guy's like, so you, you know, you let people leave bad reviews, right? | ||
| Because if you were going in and deleting people's bad reviews, that'd make people not trust you. | ||
| And Facebook and Google was forced to take down legitimate complaints about the vaccine in order to maintain the perceived manufactured consent over vaccines. | ||
| That's not a difficult thing to understand. | ||
| The connection between these two things, I was using one as sort of an analogy or an example saying you wouldn't trust a doctor who silenced his critics, right? | ||
| Well, all of these pharmaceutical companies are silencing their critics. | ||
| Wouldn't that make you not trust them very well? | ||
| The guy's like, well, I don't know about individual doctors. | ||
| It's not about individual, like, what are you talking about? | ||
| Why are you pretending to be stupid? | ||
| You spend the whole time acting smarter than everybody, but then when you're presented a very simple to understand corollary between an individual doctor getting reviews on a website and a pharmaceutical company or a vaccine deleting comments on Facebook, That's not hard to understand, but this guy's completely out of water. | ||
| He has no idea what's going on. | ||
| He's just like, but I don't delete reviews from my people. | ||
| And it's like, yeah, we know, dude. | ||
| Not talking like, it's like you're acting dumb and it's making me feel stupid because it's like, this isn't hard to understand. | ||
| It's very simple. | ||
| And the fact that you can't get it makes you think that one of us is missing something here. | ||
| So it sort of doesn't work when you act smarter than everybody and then have to pretend to be stupid because you're dishonest and lying and because you know that if you were to Comprehend the point the other person's making it would show that they're right and you're wrong So you have to act like you just don't get what he's talking about. | ||
| Well, I don't but doctors individually They might delete comments. | ||
| I don't know though. | ||
| I don't do that Okay, we're talking about mass censorship by the government of people's own personal Recounting of their vaccine injuries because they need to perpetuate the perception that there is no Antithesis to what you're saying because then you get to talk about consensus All right, welcome back folks. | ||
| I'm gonna get one more video from this surrounded Debate we go to clip number two now But it just on the final note don't you love it when people say there is no absolute truth But you're wrong because you're taking a subjective view. | ||
| It's totally inconsistent. | ||
| They just say things. | ||
| People just say things. | ||
| They don't mean anything that they say. | ||
| And it sucks. | ||
| This guy's a doctor, but it's one of those things, right? | ||
| He is just arrogant. | ||
| It's just this arrogance that comes across. | ||
| Because there is no absolute truth ever. | ||
| That was his statement. | ||
| Which is absurd on the face of it. | ||
| That's fine, that's what these people's worldview is. | ||
| But then he's willing to demonize Robert F. Kennedy, call him dangerous, because he's wrong, because he's approaching something from a subjective point of view. | ||
| Even though this guy doesn't believe that there is such thing as objective point of view, somehow he's able to say RFK's point of view Is objectively wrong. | ||
| Anybody else see a little bit of an inconsistency there? | ||
| Let's go to clip number two. | ||
| This woman again, just absolutely gets the best of Dr. Mike. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I am a pediatric hematology oncology nurse. | |
| Wow, okay. | ||
| I think a lot of mistrust in my eyes were open during the whole COVID pandemic. | ||
| Why? Institutions that were there. | ||
| I used to be in the military. | ||
| When I was in the military, I signed my bodily autonomy away. | ||
| If they had told me to do something, I did it. | ||
| And thank you for that. | ||
| Yeah, thanks. | ||
| Now, I say that in all seriousness because I think a lot of times that kind of becomes habit just to say thank you, but I really do mean that though. | ||
| I appreciate that. | ||
| So, seeing, you know, how Dr. Fauci, who was just pardoned, and that's a whole other discussion, Seeing how we were sold a bill of goods that we, the American tax dollars, paid for while these pharmaceutical companies reaped millions and millions of profits on. | ||
| And I think that caused the goalposts, oh, the vaccine, this mRNA vaccine, it's going to prevent the transmission of COVID, it's going to prevent you from getting it, and others, if you don't get this vaccine, you hate your grandmother, you're going to kill all these people, and you've got to do your duty and get it. | ||
| Well, you know what? | ||
| My grandmother got it, and she died. | ||
| I saw her take her last breath. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| And it's a very profound thing to see someone that you love Take their last breath and go on to whatever happens after. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| So when those seats and it turns out the six feet of social distancing was not based on anything. | ||
| How can you not expect people to question these higher institutions that are deemed to look out for the well-being of people and they don't? | ||
| First, bodily autonomy. | ||
| I believe that, and that is the sole principle by which we practice medicine. | ||
| Vaccines fall in a unique category because your decision on vaccinating your child and then sending them to school can impact other children in that school. | ||
| Let's pause it. | ||
| How, though? | ||
| But how, though? | ||
| If those kids are vaccinated, shouldn't matter how you... | ||
| It's just... | ||
| They just say things. | ||
| Like, he doesn't follow... | ||
| Spoiler alert, he doesn't follow this up with anything. | ||
| He doesn't justify that statement by anything. | ||
| He says bodily autonomy is our sole driving purpose, right? | ||
| But vaccines are a little bit different because you're putting other people in danger by not having vaccines. | ||
| No, you're not. | ||
| So that's the argument against that. | ||
| It's just, that's just not true. | ||
| So what is he talking about? | ||
| What is he talking about? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| We go back to the video, but he says that not taking a vaccine is a danger to other people. | ||
| I'll say it's not. | ||
| And you can decide. | ||
| Are you made dangerous because I'm not vaccinated? | ||
| Your child may be put in a dangerous situation because my kid isn't vaccinated. | ||
| No. Otherwise, the whole concept behind vaccines is faulty. | ||
| We have to rethink the whole thing. | ||
| We'll pick it up on the other side. | ||
| We have a lot more to talk about, but I want to finish out with these conversations. | ||
| Again, I think it illustrates the mindset of these people who have only even tried to understand one position, and yet they think they know it all. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Let me go ahead and give out the phone number now. | ||
| Taking your phone calls the second half of this show. | ||
| The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| We will go to your calls just as soon as they come in. | ||
| I'm still trying to figure out what the deal is with RFK and Poppers. | ||
| I keep seeing headlines. | ||
| A doctor was like, Rfk thinks poppers call cause AIDS and I keep seeing headlines that say that but then the only clip I've seen is Kenny like giving a speech and he mentions that the first thousand people to die of AIDS were all Addicted to poppers and basically living this drug-addled life of Constant degenerate sex and Heavy recreational drug use in gay men and drug addicts was the real cause | ||
| of immune deficiency amongst AIDS victims in the 1980s and 90s. | ||
| He never found any evidence HIV actually kills a T-cell. | ||
| Asserting that connection between HIV and AIDS was itself the product of a medical conspiracy with former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci at its head. | ||
| 100% of the people who died, the first 1,000 who had AIDS, were people who were addicted to poppers. | ||
| Kennedy falsely told an audience of supporters in a video posted by the watchdog social media account Patriot Takes in 2023. | ||
| There were people that were part of a gay lifestyle where they were burning the candle at both ends and there were poppers on sale everywhere at gay bars. | ||
| So it's not him actually saying poppers cause AIDS. | ||
| So. There's that, I guess. | ||
| There's that. | ||
| Again, it's just the supreme irony of the doctor countering misinformation himself spewing misinformation. | ||
| surprising, but annoying, but also all right we got some more i got some more videos to show you and other stories to get into as the phone lines fill up let's go to clip number let's go to clip number six now because this is again about about doge and elon musk and the attempt to clean up the federal government and the just shocking | ||
|
unidentified
|
that have been coming out let's watch talking about this we were with elon just now we were just with elon in the west wing incredible stat he said i'm not going to name the firm so that i don't want to but he said this one organization gets 98 of their revenue i was in the newspaper so we can say it it's booze alan so we were talking about this and then we're going through the numbers on the other firms and it's just the whole thing it's shocking What kind of risk management is that, by the way? | |
| Yeah. But it tells you that they didn't manage the risk. | ||
| That's right. | ||
| Tells you how entrenched they believe they were. | ||
| And how good it is for them. | ||
| And how good it is. | ||
| You're absolutely right. | ||
| And the way the grift works, you can only have six-month contracts, but there are people who have had 46-month contracts. | ||
| Incredible. Like, they've been in situ for 20 years. | ||
| 20 years. | ||
| Incredible. Of course, that's Booz Allen Hamilton. | ||
| I mean, it's the same with the Rand Corporation. | ||
| It's the same with Lockheed Martin. | ||
| I mean, these are pseudo-governmental agencies. | ||
| They're private companies, but all of their contracts come directly from the government. | ||
| And the, you know, beautiful thing about that is that they get to write the reports that compel the government to buy their products. | ||
| So it's very convenient. | ||
| They get to write the reports that say, you know, how important it is, how vital it is for national security interests that we buy a million more Tomahawk missiles from them. | ||
| So yeah, it's very convenient, and these companies are hand-in-glove with the government, which wouldn't even be that bad of a thing, except when you understand that the people that run these companies are billionaires, and the people that work in these companies are multi-multi-millionaires, | ||
| and all of that money is coming from taxpayer dollars being funneled into them with very little oversight or control Or justification for any of the money being spent and most of it goes towards Fabricating reasons for these organizations to exist creating the wars That facilitate the Commercial activity of these corporations Let's go to another video here clip number five. | ||
| This is Megyn Kelly responding to the continual stream of, let's not have any continual stream. | ||
| just have this thing where they can take one accusation, even like unproven accusation, and they just run with it, just gets brought up every single time a person is talked about. | ||
| And you'll see, Megyn Kelly makes this point, actually. | ||
| The way that if it's a Democrat who gets in trouble, just gets washed away, not even talked about, nobody's concerned about it. | ||
| But when it's Trump, even the most flimsy and illegitimate accusation will dog him the rest of his life, even though it's just completely fraudulent and totally unsubstantiated. | ||
| Megyn Kelly makes a bunch of good points about journalism and bias in this country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I just want to understand something clearly. | |
| Donald Trump was found liable for sexual assault. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| The things I heard were included things like he got handsy on an airplane. | ||
| Now, I don't know whether that happened or it didn't, but do I find that a deal-breaker for a possible politician? | ||
| Not really. | ||
| At least I reported on their stories and did them the courtesy of bringing them to air in front of millions of people and let the audience make up its mind. | ||
| My problem is more with these Democrats who will bury these allegations against their candidates or their candidate spouses and then play holier-than-thou when they're looking at Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you see yourself as a journalist still? | |
| Or would you not describe yourself like that anymore? | ||
| No, I'm still a journalist. | ||
| I mean, I break news all the time. | ||
| And when I sit with Trump or anybody else in the administration, I ask tough questions. | ||
| I mean, as recently as September of 23, I interviewed Trump and he got so mad at me. | ||
| He didn't talk to me for six or seven months. | ||
| So it's not, look, it's a tough job to do. | ||
| You have to be able to hit the people you admire. | ||
| And I do, you know, I've, I've hit them all. | ||
| Right before the election, I ripped on Trump's Madison Square Garden rally as too bro-tastic and got specific about why. | ||
| You have to understand, like, if you haven't sold your soul, you have to be willing to criticize the people, even you, that you admire on your, quote, side. | ||
| And my owning my bias by going out there on stage with Donald Trump and saying, I'm voting for him and you should too, is a bonus. | ||
| When it comes to my credibility. | ||
| Now everybody has zero doubt about where I stand and they can filter everything I say through the appropriate lens. | ||
| What typically happens in journalism is they say they have no bias and then they just work it out in the printed word or on their shows without owning it. | ||
| But the audience knows it and it creates a distrust and a divide. | ||
| When it comes to Trump and me, no. | ||
| My own personal opinion is Most of the allegations against him are much more complicated than the mainstream media would have you believe. | ||
| And I don't think Donald Trump is a rapist or a sexual assaulter. | ||
| I do think he's taken inappropriate liberties with women and gotten handsy with them in a way he's owned himself. | ||
| Okay? Years ago when he was a celebrity. | ||
| And it is what it is. | ||
| That's the past. | ||
| But it's just about so much more than that. | ||
| We are talking about How many people dying at the southern border because of the invasion that we've suffered under Joe Biden? | ||
| We're talking about Lincoln Riley, whose killer was let in under Biden. | ||
| We put him on a taxpayer flight down to Georgia where he murdered her. | ||
| I don't give a shit about Trump getting handsy with somebody 20 years ago. | ||
| I want someone who will close the border, which he has. | ||
| I want someone who will keep boys out of my daughter's sports, which he has. | ||
| I want someone who will stand up for to the insane DEI policies so that white kids will stop hearing in school that they're born with some original sin from which they cannot recover, which he has. | ||
| brilliantly put by megan megan kelly and you know it's just uh yeah it's just this thing i don't even know there there's another story along similar but the headline from washington A judge can't just declare that. | ||
| That's not how any of this works. | ||
| It's not true just because a judge says it's true. | ||
| The way this is supposed to work, you're supposed to be accused, and then you're supposed to be able to mount a defense, and a jury is supposed to consider all the evidence. | ||
| In this case, a judge has just asserted that he raped E. Jean Carroll. | ||
| They just start with that as an assumption. | ||
| Never been proven. | ||
| Accusation was never, you know, allowed to be confronted in court. | ||
| Never had to be proven. | ||
| They didn't put any evidence forward to prove that. | ||
| No witnesses were questioned. | ||
| No statements were taken. | ||
| A judge just asserted that legally, he's a rapist. | ||
| And it's just like, that is the way they establish truth in the rules-based mindset. | ||
| Right? A judge said it, therefore it is true. | ||
| It's just like, so, our whole system of jurisprudence, the whole process by which We have established as a civilization, the way we get to the truth just doesn't matter because a judge asserted it. | ||
| A judge said something, so therefore, it's true and you're not allowed to contradict it. | ||
| It's just, again, it's the arbitrary nature of all of this. | ||
| They don't have to prove it. | ||
| They don't have to give you a chance to respond. | ||
| They don't have to litigate this in open court. | ||
| They just get to assert things, and then it's taken as gospel truth. | ||
| It's absurd. | ||
| It's ridiculous, and it's frankly outrageous. | ||
| And when it comes to the discussion of judges, I'll read story, and then we'll go out to phone calls. | ||
| But even in the last, like, 24 hours, judges put a temporary – or they've blocked – Trump's revision the his removal of the temporary protected status of Venezuelan migrants Which get like we Something has to something has to break here This is not the way our government is supposed to work. | ||
| This is a constitutional crisis that we're in right now and the constitutional crisis is that the judiciary branch is usurping power over From the executive branch. | ||
| That the executive branch, elected by the people, has certain obligations and functions that is not being allowed to perform. | ||
| The president, our system was not designed so that the president had to have unanimous approval from 700 judges throughout the country. | ||
| The president's discretion, the choices he makes, Are not all 100% subject to interference by any of these 700 judges, many of which, as we've laid out, are literal just Democratic activist appointees. | ||
| They were never judges. | ||
| They'd never been judges before. | ||
| Somehow, because they volunteered, they worked for a leftist NGO for 20 years, then get put on a judge's bench, now they get veto authority? | ||
| Over everything the executive branch does. | ||
| It's not the way it works. | ||
| It's not the way it works. | ||
| But the other thing you have to understand is judges do not have the capability to autonomously interfere in these things. | ||
| What's happening behind the scenes is that these leftist organizations are using government taxpayer dollars, right? | ||
| Like the leftovers from the USAID, NGOs. | ||
| you | ||
| Say I represent him. | ||
| This is like the SPLC, right? | ||
| Or whoever is the ACLU, the SPLC, whatever these organizations are that are launching these lawsuits. | ||
| So they launch in a lawsuit and they say, we need an emergency injunction. | ||
| So because until we decide the answer to this question, you know, our client can't be deported. | ||
| And so the judge works with them, cooperates with them, and all of this is pre-staged, right? | ||
| And then they go through the motions once it happens. | ||
| But the judge can't independently do it. | ||
| It's because of this gigantic network of leftist NGOs that are working together to file these things with friendly judges that they know will issue an injunction on their behalf. | ||
| So it's beyond just the judges, but the executive branch somehow. | ||
| Somehow they have the right to grant temporary protected status, but not take it away. | ||
| Somehow the executive branch of this country has the ability to, without question or interference, or objection, import millions of people from other countries, house them in this country, give them IDs and social security numbers and benefits, but that same executive branch doesn't have the right to reverse that process and send them out of the country. | ||
| That's not the way this is supposed to work. | ||
| And honestly, at this point, Trump just needs to say the Supreme Court is the only one who can interfere. | ||
| Supreme Court's the only one. | ||
| I don't care if Boasberg, I don't care if Chutkin doesn't like what I'm doing. | ||
| These people have no right to discount the votes that 80 plus million Americans cast for Donald Trump. | ||
| That's all that's happening here. | ||
| They're undermining the entire process of the American government. | ||
| They're interfering with things they have absolutely no right to interfere with. | ||
| And they are robbing us of our voice by doing that. | ||
| If the people we vote for can't put in the policies that we voted for because some judge that nobody voted for is blocking it, this is a problem. | ||
| This is an issue. | ||
| And even just the amount of resources and energy that will be wasted just trying to like litigate this stuff in court. | ||
| The Supreme Court should be the only ones They get to interfere with the executive branch no action should be taken by the executive branch in response to the Judiciary until it gets the Supreme Court and even then I think it should be treated as a suggestion And there were like three things I can't think of them right now, | ||
| but like it's just you know last night Like, actually, a judge says you can't end protective status for Venezuelans, and you can't stop giving away money, and you can't fire people that work for you. | ||
| Everything Trump does has to be approved by unanimous consent by 700 judges all over the United States, most of which were leftist activists, are leftist activists. | ||
| But it goes beyond that, from Daniel Huff in the Wall Street Journal, why Judge Boasberg's deportation order is legally invalid. | ||
| He failed to impose a bond on plaintiffs as the law requires other injunctions have the same deficiency. | ||
| The Trump administration is locked in a standoff with Judge James Boasberg over the deportation flights under the Alien Enemies Act. | ||
| Officials could face contempt proceedings and the president and his supporters have called for the judge's impeachment. | ||
| Yet the administration seems to be overlooking a critical legal tool, injunction bonds. | ||
| The argument is rock solid. | ||
| Under Rule 65c of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party seeking an injunction needs to put up a bond to cover its costs. | ||
| These bonds aren't optional. | ||
| They're mandatory unless the government is seeking an injunction. | ||
| That means Judge Boasburg's order and dozens like it may not be valid at all. | ||
| again, they have to be, these cases have to be put forward by a plaintiff. | ||
| The plaintiff in most of these cases is like the ACLU or the SPLC or some other legal group. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Acting with government money. | ||
| So they have to put forward the money to pay for the bond. | ||
| But they're not. | ||
| They haven't. | ||
| President Trump identified this legal off-ramp in a March 11 memorandum directing the Justice Department to demand bonds in future injunction cases. | ||
| Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley echoed the call, but the Justice Department hasn't pressed the issue either in Judge Boasberg's courtroom or other high-stakes cases in which activist judges have blocked major policies without requiring plaintiffs to put a single dollar at risk. | ||
| In Judge Boguesburg's case, because no bond was required, the temporary restraining order never took legal effect, meaning any alleged government noncompliance is by definition not a violation. | ||
| The same legal flaw undercuts more than 30 other injunctions issued against Trump administration policies without meaningful bond. | ||
| Far from a technicality, this is a fundamental failure to follow rule. | ||
| So again, if we want to live in a world where Everything is being hamstrung and, you know, every choice Trump tries to implement is blocked under some obscure legalistic malfeasance or interference or, | ||
| you know, provision that means that they're allowed to come in and interfere, then they gotta stick, then they gotta play the whole game. | ||
| I mean, if they're going to use the rule set to their advantage, Then they have to fulfill all of the obligations that the rule sets put rule set puts forward and None of them have none of them have so far so the crew can bring up that that article find an Uncensored version here, | ||
| but they have it available far from technicality This is a fundamental failure to follow rule 65c the text legislative history and appellate court president including from judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg of the u.s We're good. | ||
| that a bond is an optional it's a legal precondition for an injunction to be valid the fourth circuit has made clear that the bond rule is not discretionary only the government may obtain an injunction without posting a bond quote there are no other exceptions the third circuit has characterized the bond as a condition precedent to issuing injunctive relief according to the fourth circuit failure to acquire a bond before granting preliminary injunctive release is reversible error | ||
| These precedents faithfully reflect the plaintext rule of 65c which permits courts to issue injunctions or temporary restraining orders only if the plaintiff's post bond. | ||
| They uphold Congress's unanimous unambiguous intent in 1914 when it repealed the discretionary language of the 1911 judiciary code and replaced it with a mandatory bond requirement. | ||
| Yet activist judges continue to sidestep the rule by setting nominal or de minimis bonds. | ||
| Courts have some discretion in setting the amount but it must be quote Proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined. | ||
| In practice, the cost is rarely zero, and appellate courts have repeatedly struck down attempts to treat it as such. | ||
| In National Kidney Patient Association v. | ||
| Sullivan, 1992, a district judge enjoined the government from lowering reimbursement rates for dialysis service but required only a $1,000 bond. | ||
| The D.C. | ||
| Circuit remanded the case, ordering the district court to set an appropriate bond, citing the more than $18 million already paid out by Medicare under the injunction. | ||
| Similarly, in the Maryland Department of Human Resources versus USDA 1992, the Fourth Circuit vacated an injunction that exposed the federal food stamp program to significant losses because no bond had been required. | ||
| That should have been a warning shot. | ||
| Yet in an egregious case this month, Maryland v. | ||
| USDA, a district judge ordered the Trump administration to rehire 25,000 fired federal probationary employees at a minimum cost of $45 million a month while setting the bond at $100 for each plaintiff. | ||
| The judge offered three-week justifications. | ||
| First, he admitted the government faced financial harm but claimed it was too complex to calculate. | ||
| Ah, it's too complex. | ||
| Nah, it's just too difficult to understand. | ||
| So I'll just say $100. | ||
| The damage during an expedited hearing, but that's precisely the scenario Rule 65 was designed to address. | ||
| Bonds are the safeguard against costly errors in fast-moving litigation. | ||
| Second, the judge cited Hosh something versus Nanya Plastics, 1999, a Fourth Circuit case. | ||
| He claimed supported nominal bonds. | ||
| The potential, the opinion references nominal bonds only in passing and only in cases where the risk of harm is remote. | ||
| Finally, the judge invoked the familiar refuge of activist courts a made-up and subjective public interest exception. | ||
| This elitist conceit presumes that it is in the public interest to exempt activists from standard rule legal rules so they can block actions ordered by the president for whom 77 million Americans voted. | ||
| This exception does not hold water. | ||
| The D.C. | ||
| district court case, a district judge tried to invoke public interest to waive the bond. | ||
| The appellate panel, which included future Justice Ginsburg, rejected that outright, saying this completely overlooks the key purpose of a bond to make plaintiffs consider the damage they may inflict by pressing ahead with a possibly losing claim. | ||
| So, again, this matters a lot because you have these NGO organizations like the SPLC and ACL. | ||
| ACLU and they have no limiting factor in the number or the size of the cases they can bring If instead they were forced to actually contend with the amount of money that they're forcing the government to pay by filing these, they would be severely limited in both the number of cases they can file and the size of the cases that they could file. | ||
| So by ignoring these injunction bonds, they're allowing the left wing to run rampant and totally destroy Trump's potential in a second presidency. | ||
| That's the end. | ||
| We are going to go out to your phone calls this hour, and we're going to hit the ground running in the next segment. | ||
| But I just received this, just dropped from Project Veritas, and I want to go to it. | ||
| And it ties into everything that we're talking about here, the rules-based mindset that we're contending with. | ||
| Because there is the spirit of the law and the letter of the law. | ||
| And the spirit of the law, as it's now been put forward by the Trump administration, Is that there should not be discrimination in hiring. | ||
| Doesn't matter if you call it DEI or CRT or Affirmative Action. | ||
| The fact is that people are being discriminated against because of their immutable characteristics. | ||
| That's anathema, a violation of the fundamental belief of American meritocracy. | ||
| And so it should end. | ||
| What these people here is, oh DEI is ending? | ||
| Let's call it DIE and keep going. | ||
| Because who? | ||
| Because it's not about adhering to the spirit of the law. | ||
| It's about finding a workaround by manipulating the letter of the law. | ||
| So this is from Project Veritas. | ||
| Washington wordsmiths, NASA and State Department employees rebrand DEI to defy Trump's orders. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So it has to go away from the mental DEI stuff. | |
| The same thing happened the last time,'cause I was already ready to go when Trump was president last time. | ||
| They like canceled DEI and stuff, but people just like did it and called it. | ||
| Something else. | ||
| I'm just working around the rules. | ||
| Now we have to be careful with, like, writing proposals with terms like climate change or whatever. | ||
| If people like that term, they don't believe in that, and they're probably not getting money for any of that. | ||
| We can change the term climate change by natural hazards or something like that, but yeah. | ||
| Is that what you had to do, like, the first time you was in that office? | ||
| Yeah, that's pretty much what I did. | ||
| Still able to get funding, right? | ||
| Yeah. President Trump's deadline for federal offices to end their diversity, equity, and inclusion programs is fast approaching. | ||
| DEI is seemingly dead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
On Tuesday, President Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion. | |
| Already today we've got emails like, all DEAI, DEI stuff is canceled at the State Department. | ||
| So, well, I mean, it doesn't really affect my job, but it's for people who are working in those positions. | ||
| I don't really know what they're going to do. | ||
| So it has to go away to now? | ||
| DEI stuff? | ||
| It's unclear, like, I mean, the same thing happened the last time,'cause I was already working for the government, Trump was president last time and in a different agency. | ||
| Oh. And they like canceled DEI and stuff, but people just like did it and called it something else. | ||
| Really? Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, just work around the rules. | ||
| So what did they do instead? | ||
| calling it like multicultural activities instead of like diversity inclusion. | ||
| Just like change the word but it means the same. | ||
| It's genius. | ||
| So is that what they're going to do this time? | ||
| Or like team building or something like that. | ||
| Probably that's what they'll do. | ||
| We'll see how strict they're going to be about it. | ||
| It's genius. | ||
| People just end up calling it something different, and it's just the same thing. | ||
| Exactly. It's been a little hard, but the new administration, they're like, you know, they're putting lots of new executive orders to like change rules and stuff, so like, now we have to be careful with like writing proposals with terms like climate change or whatever. | ||
| Why? People don't like that term. | ||
| They don't believe that. | ||
| They're probably not on any of that. | ||
| They're not going to find any of this? | ||
| No. We can change the term climate change by natural hazards or something like that. | ||
| Yeah. Is that what you had to do? | ||
| So, again, this is the rules-based mindset that we're dealing with. | ||
| Yeah, they want to get rid of DEI, so we'll just call it something else. | ||
| Wow, genius. | ||
| Wow, you're so smart. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, you're so smart. | |
| We're not gonna find any of this? | ||
| I mean, you just blatantly lie. | ||
| Is that smart? | ||
| Is that clever? | ||
| Yeah, all these people need to be... | ||
| fired. So, fire them. | ||
| All these people should be fired and we shouldn't be funding any of the crap they do. | ||
| Alright, welcome back, folks. | ||
| I'm glad to hear your phone calls. | ||
| Although, on the note of... | ||
| DEI, This is what it looks like My son has been rejected from all but one school. | ||
| I'm shocked at how competitive college admissions have become This is this is from a reddit called applying to college and even just that sentence. | ||
| It's like The boomer mindset comes through I'm shocked how competitive college admissions have become College admissions haven't become competitive your son's being discriminated against Because he's the wrong race. | ||
| College applications are just so competitive. | ||
| No, you're being deliberately excluded from the possibility of going to college because your country is run by people who hate you because of your race. | ||
| Just want to make that clear before we even get into it, says my eldest son has been rejected by every college he applied to except for our flagship state school, UMass Amherst. | ||
| He is the singular brightest, most self-motivated and hardest working person I know. | ||
| He's the valedictorian of 476 students. | ||
| He scored five on 18 AP exams and scored 1580 on his SAT, which I think means he missed one question in all the SAT. | ||
| He created an online gaming website to target elementary and middle school students with 180,000 users per month. | ||
| Earning $3,000 last year through ad revenue, he conducted research for three summers under a professor at Boston University and was the first author of two papers. | ||
| He worked weekends at a grocery store for two years and worked a paid internship at a local tech company. | ||
| He's the president of the Computer Science Club and the vice president of the math team. | ||
| He took 11 dual enrollment classes that college juniors and seniors normally take, getting all A's. | ||
| He qualified for AIME two times. | ||
| He's a Davidson Young Scholar, an organization for students with IQ scores of 145 and above. | ||
| I would like to stress that he's nearly all self-motivated. | ||
| He's not a robot kid who does what their parents tells them to. | ||
| He wants to do computer science and work in tech, which I don't know the first thing about. | ||
| Yeah, well, what an idiot. | ||
| Your son's an idiot. | ||
| He could have been playing video games and smoking weed and gotten the same outcome. | ||
| Because that's the world that's being set up. | ||
| The world that's being set up on purpose by design is discriminating specifically against white and Asian people. | ||
| The person in this case is like a quarter Asian, I guess. | ||
| but Three-fourths white, one-fourth Korean lineage. | ||
| And yeah, it doesn't matter how well you do. | ||
| You're going to be discriminated against instead of your son, who works his ass off 24-7, who is dedicated and self-motivated into being a functional, prosperous, responsible member of society, is going to be not chosen because You know, some inner-city black kid with a SAT score of 1250 is going to get his spot instead because it's not about what's best for the individual student or what's best for society at large. | ||
| It's about discriminating against and disadvantaging white people. | ||
| Okay? There's no, there's no, you know, motivation behind this that is good. | ||
| It's just pure discrimination, hatred, invasion, Soft to genocide. | ||
| That's all that's happening here. | ||
| It's not good for anybody to have a kid like this resign to some, you know, lower level school. | ||
| In all likelihood, I mean, we know that the discrimination is not going to stop with where he's going to college. | ||
| He's also not going to be hired because of the race and sex that he is. | ||
| I mean, in all likelihood, this Kid is gonna be like a he's gonna drop out He's gonna realize that all of the effort that he put in is wasted that no matter how good he is or how successful he is He will be despised by the people in power and prevented from actually achieving anything. | ||
| I don't probably just Give up and become one of the millions upon millions of flameouts in this country young men my age and younger With incredible potential incredible capabilities Could help to contribute to an incredible country and and you know provide So much of what's needed Economically and instead they'll play video games | ||
| and they'll smoke weed Forever and that's the world that's being set up on purpose by design And it's almost, like, sad. | ||
| I mean, it is sad. | ||
| Seeing this dad who's, like, obviously so proud of his son. | ||
| He's just like, man, my son, he's doing everything right. | ||
| He's gonna be set up for greatness. | ||
| Can't wait to see what he achieves. | ||
| Probably go to Princeton or Harvard. | ||
| He'll be rubbing elbows with the richest, most powerful people in the world. | ||
| He'll get to You know, get to be an important politician or industry leader. | ||
| You know, in 50 years, he'll have some mansion in Telluride and he'll be hanging out with NASA engineers and it's like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Your kid's going to go to state school where he'll be discriminated against and despised. | ||
| And then he'll apply for jobs and he'll get outdone by Some Indian, you know, H-1B with a fake diploma from a university that's actually a car shop. | ||
| And they don't even realize it. | ||
| And they don't even realize it. | ||
| That's what I mean when this guy's like, wow, college admissions is really competitive. | ||
| Like, do you think there are other people out there like your son? | ||
| Do you really think there are so many kids out there that are just getting perfect SAT scores, all A's in advanced classes, going out of their way to take, you know, extra credit and all these sorts of things, volunteering and being the president of every club in the school, and this teacher's like, wow, I didn't realize that that wasn't enough to get into Harvard. | ||
| It's like, no, it'll never be enough. | ||
| No, the kid you just laid out is the perfect candidate for literally any school anywhere in the world. | ||
| If they cared about achievement, if they cared about excellence, if they cared about merit, or contributing to society, you're still going to be the first person they would choose. | ||
| They don't care about any of that stuff. | ||
| They really don't. | ||
| They care about it is disadvantaging white and Asian people to bring about some sort of utopian equity amongst the races. | ||
| And so the world is being set up. | ||
| If you're an overachiever, you're an idiot. | ||
| That sucks. | ||
| That shouldn't be the case. | ||
| That shouldn't be how it is. | ||
| And you'd like to live in a world where a kid like this, you'd encourage, Hey, you'll keep it up, kid. | ||
| You're going to do great things. | ||
| It's like, no, you're white. | ||
| You're white. | ||
| So you're going to be discriminated against. | ||
| That's just how it is. | ||
| All right. | ||
| More so ever than, than ever happened in America under, under Jim Crow or anything else. | ||
| Even then you had, you know, the exceptionally achieving black people would, they would go to university. | ||
| They'd go to white universities or they had their own black universities that they could go to. | ||
| But it just, it just wouldn't make any, it wouldn't make any sense and it doesn't make any sense to have a world where these incredibly high achievers are just wasted. | ||
| Just wasted. | ||
| Literally tens of millions of them. | ||
| So anyway, he goes on and on. | ||
| It goes on and on. | ||
| I find this deeply concerning. | ||
| I'm also deeply concerned for my son. | ||
| For when he tells me tech is not at all like finance. | ||
| That he'll be able to get interviews at top tech companies despite going to UMass Amherst. | ||
| Still, he's very upset and I don't know what to tell him. | ||
| I think he and the people around him attach an undue amount of weight to superficial prestige. | ||
| I told him this and he knows it's true, but he's still incredibly upset. | ||
| Like, dude, stop being such a boomer. | ||
| Stop being such a boomer. | ||
| No, it matters where you go to school. | ||
| It matters that your son is instead of being surrounded by people as smart or smarter than him and driving him to do greater things and give him access to resources and networks that will maximize his achievement possibility. | ||
| Instead, he's going to be around a bunch of people who coasted through high school with C's, are going to their state school, only care about getting drunk. | ||
| He's going to be totally demoralized. | ||
| He's going to feel it's going to feel totally hopeless. | ||
| He's going to breeze through all of his classes and not be challenged and not not, you know, be motivated to achieve greater because he's going to achieve better than anybody else around him without even trying. | ||
| So he's probably going to get. | ||
| I mean, I'm just saying we can bookmark this in 10 years. | ||
| I can almost guarantee you. | ||
| This kid's son. | ||
| Is going to be really good at Rocket League. | ||
| And I've spent $30,000 on weed. | ||
| That's because I've seen this over and over again. | ||
| I've seen this with people. | ||
| And it's designed like that. | ||
| It's on purpose. | ||
| It's all part of our destruction. | ||
| And it's all working incredibly well. | ||
| With that, we got to phone calls. | ||
| Hey, how's it going Harrison? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, how's it going? | |
| I've been Man, a few of us have been pretty involved in the whole trying to get the boys out of a young girl's sport thing. | ||
| Our governor and the main principal association just seems to ignore Trump's executive orders. | ||
| So right now, I don't know if the Infowarriors are familiar, but a month and a half ago, we had two young ladies that were supposed to tie for first, but their state championship was robbed from them by a young boy that competed The following year, as a boy, placed in and said, you know what? | ||
| I'm going to be a young lady and competed and won first place. | ||
| So what we did is we actually turned around and went and made the plaques and medals that they would have won with their name on it, their school's name on it, calling them the state champions that they are. | ||
| I also started a club where I will be making awards for any Young lady that I can get their contact information and what school they're going to to send them the award that they are That they deserve you know these young ladies It's not like you wake up one morning and become a state champion to decide you're going to do that that takes work that takes effort these young ladies have been working their entire life for this and for it for them to be wrong because our governor and What a lot of people from that are not in | ||
| the state of Maine don't realize is the Maine Principal Association is a group That is actually in charge of all the high school and middle school and all that sports here in Maine. | ||
| They're the ones who are coming out in defiance against President Trump's executive order because they claim that they don't receive federal funding. | ||
| And the principal at the high school here locally in Augusta is also the president of the Maine Principal Association. | ||
| And last couple of school boards I've been going to, I've been calling her out and stuff like that. | ||
| Well, I found out information that the way to get rid of the principal at your school, I don't know how it is anywhere else but here in Maine, is all you need to do is get the school board to bring it to a vote. | ||
| So I started a petition, and I'm doorknocking Augusta, getting Augusta residents to sign this petition to bring to the next school board meeting, and I'm going to not only bring this petition, but I'm also going to highlight in different colors, because if you're going for a school board, The entire city doesn't vote for each person. | ||
| It breaks down by ward. | ||
| Ward 1, Ward 2, Ward 3. And I know you've been a big part of the activism that's been going on there, holding protests and stuff. | ||
| I have a few stories about it just to give people some context as to exactly what you're talking about. | ||
| We've got this story here. | ||
| Maine officials won't comply with the Trump administration's trans-athlete ban. | ||
| The administration said earlier this month that the Maine Department of Education, Maine Principals Association, and a high school are each in violation of Title IX because of participation of trans athletes. | ||
| School officials in Maine said Thursday they will not comply with a proposed agreement from President Donald Trump's administration that would bar transgender athletes from participating in girls' sports. | ||
| The U.S. Health and Human Services said earlier this month that the Maine Department of Education, Maine Principals Association, and high school are each in violation of Title IX because of the participation of transgender athletes. | ||
| This came after a public spat between Trump and Democratic Maine Governor Janet Mills about the subject. | ||
| The health department gave the institution 10 days to comply with a voluntary agreement to settle the issues by banning the athletes. | ||
| The principal's association was to oversee high school services. | ||
| Let's A transgender athlete's victory in a Maine State pole vaulting competition has reignited the debate over transgender participation in girls sports. | ||
| He beat the women by six inches in the pole vault competition, a competition that he had competed in the previous year as a boy and gotten in fifth place. | ||
| So there he robs the first place victory from the women in a event for which he didn't even place, you know, in the top three as a man. | ||
| So he just says he's a woman now and goes from fifth place to first place and steals the accomplishment from actual women and actual girls who are competing in this. | ||
| And the main government is still doing everything it can to resist the will of the people and continue to, you know, rob young women of their glory. | ||
| How do people follow you and where can they find information about the protest you guys are holding? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, tonight, actually, if you're an Augusta resident or close to Augusta, tonight we are having something at the Elks Lodge starting at 5.30. | |
| All the information is on my ex-account, PWA1776. | ||
| But tonight we're having something at the Elks Lodge. | ||
| It's pretty much, there'll be dinner provided. | ||
| This is just kind of like a workshop to prepare parents how to go to your local school board, how to fight back with Title IX. | ||
| But if anyone here in Maine, especially in Augusta, if you want to help me, I am trying to get signatures. | ||
| I got voter logs for 2024. | ||
| I know door knocking is not everybody's thing. | ||
| I will say this, I have knocked on doors and I have, there's only been one person that turned me down. | ||
| I've had four people tell me that they are registered Democrats, and they don't agree with me 90% of the time. | ||
| But this is something that we have calming grounds on. | ||
| There you go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So it's actually, all I need, and then I also have a, I finally broke down and made a government gift thing. | |
| That's pinned to the top of my profile. | ||
| If you guys would like to help with the campaign of, you know, making sure that these girls get the medals and stuff that they're provided for, and, you know, printing off paper and stuff like that. | ||
| That costs money, you know. | ||
| There's all different ways you can help me out, but what I really need is I need people to help me knock on these doors, because right now, it's just me. | ||
| And we really have a solid chance. | ||
| Yeah, I've been following along and watching you sort of lead this movement. | ||
| I've really enjoyed it, and I'm glad you called in to talk about it today. | ||
| We'll DM on X, but I'd love for you to come on with a really good connection and a good video. | ||
| We'll do a video interview to talk to you about this, because, again, this is what we need all over the country. | ||
| It's one of these it's I mean you heard Gavin Newsom a couple weeks ago asked about this with Charlie Couric and he's like of course of course women shouldn't be competing with men it's about fairness this is simple and it's like okay so even the extreme left in this country is realizing what a losing issue this is and is backing off and you know acting like oh we always thought that you know women and men should not compete in sports together so you know I guess some Democrats are More extreme than others or some are slower and coming around to realizing nobody | ||
| likes their ideas or You know people actually appreciate fairness So the people in Maine are still clinging on to this utterly losing issue and I think it's a brilliant thing for Info warriors to be a part of so Godspeed corn pop and we'll talk again soon. | ||
| Go follow corn pop at PWA 1776 and the Elks Lodge today PWA 1776 Yeah, before I get to that, I just want to say a tip of the hat to Corn Pop. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listen, Corn Pop, that is the way you do it, buddy. | |
| Be active and do everything, be thoughtful, be unique. | ||
| And you're right, man. | ||
| If everyone's going to get a trophy for just competing and they're not really much of a champion, Damn sure, the girls do deserve that are champions that worked their whole lives to get these trophies. | ||
| They deserve them. | ||
| They shouldn't be beat by boys pretending that they're girls. | ||
| Absolutely. Absolutely. | ||
| You know, I'm sure most people know somebody who has, you know, somebody in your family or something is a dedicated athlete, but man, I have a cousin who is a state champion in running and it's like, yeah, you have to be obsessed. | ||
| You have to literally spend every waking hour Yeah. | ||
| every single morning blisters all over your feet. | ||
| Like it's just, it's brutal to steal that from, from young women. | ||
| So yeah. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Corn pop for standing up and thank you, Tim, for bringing that up. | ||
| But I know that's not what you called in about. | ||
| Yeah. What I called in about is this popped on the internet like three hours ago on AOL, Yahoo, and the headline, Warren Buffett acquires Elon Musk's Tesla for $1 trillion in cash. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you read the article and it's amazing. | |
| I mean, it gives you all the details. | ||
| And I was even thinking, you know, yeah, Warren Buffett was famous for be greedy when others are fearful. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I was thinking, yeah, man, he's all in. | |
| He's all in. | ||
| And I didn't even think he liked tech stocks. | ||
| And you get to the very last two italic sentences of the article and it tells you, April Fool's. | ||
| This article is entirely satirical and was published on April 1st, 2025. | ||
| But the comedy is you watch how many people published it without reading the entire article. | ||
| They want to be quick on the draw. | ||
| And now you go to the pages and it's like, oops, this page isn't there anymore. | ||
| We don't know what happened. | ||
| That's funny. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, you know, I have to say we've been doing this show for over five years at this point and there have been a lot of fake stories that I've seen a lot of other people run with and react to. | ||
| I think we pretty much have like a perfect, we have like a perfect record on this. | ||
| We, we really don't fall for these types of stories and we didn't fall for this one today of Warren Buffett buying Tesla. | ||
| However, I think, you know, it might not be a bad idea. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Maybe that's maybe that's giving into the to the terrorists or or whatever. | ||
| But I don't know. | ||
| It seems like. | ||
| If I was a Tesla shareholder, I would just be like, yeah, can somebody just buy this from Elon Musk or can we just like not associate Elon Musk with this? | ||
| Because I don't know, it's just there's something just like simply unfair about this corporation suffering so much because of these leftist insane people. | ||
| And like, I don't want there to be like a government bailout of them or something. | ||
| but clearly they're being forced to face pressures that uh any other corporation is not faced with i don't know what to do about it but i don't know if i was a tesla shareholder i might be like hey elon why don't you just why don't you just have a functionary role or whatever like you still make all the money you can still own it but like i don't know it's just it's just uh sucks because | ||
| i mean if they're if they're attacking people that get teslas and you know there's all these people out there shopping for cars and have to take that into account and go well i really want a tesla but i don't want to be attacked so i'll go shop somebody else i mean they're doing massive massive damage to this company it's totally unfair uh but yeah warren buffett has not purchased tesla that is uh not true not true thank you for uh warning us about that today | ||
| Fool. April Fool's Warren Buffett will continue to buy everything else but not Tesla. | ||
| Let's go to Wild in Wisconsin. | ||
| We're going to talk about these Supreme Court elections in Wisconsin. | ||
| We played the clip of the debate earlier today. | ||
| A lot of attention being put on this. | ||
| And I think it's ultimately important because the Democrats have announced they are going to gerrymander Republican representation out of existence in Wisconsin if they take this Supreme Court. | ||
| Go ahead, Wild. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Hey, Harrison. | ||
| Yeah, I have called a To a The election, you know, elections have consequences here. | ||
| Yeah, it's infuriating. | ||
| I'll tell you what, stay on the line, Wild. | ||
| We'll go back to you on the other side. | ||
| We've got to take a quick commercial break. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| Wild in Wisconsin is talking about the Supreme Court election in Wisconsin. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| We got cut off by the commercial break there, Wild. | ||
| But I wanted to let you finish your point. | ||
| You're on the air, sir. | ||
| Sure, sure. | ||
| Yeah, I think after all these years, I'm going to execute Plan E and escape because there's no point. | ||
| No matter how hard we try, they just change the rules because they're cheaters. | ||
| People don't understand Elon Musk was here. | ||
| He understands, and Trump. | ||
| But like, they're going to not only gerrymander and take the house, but they're going to change the districts and the voting rules here in Wisconsin. | ||
| So Wisconsin is going to flip back blue, you know, and then it's going to be in the next election. | ||
| What are your thoughts on that? | ||
| What are your thoughts on that? | ||
| spoke years ago about how the Pyramid Nikola Tesla designed his wireless transmission device. | ||
| power system somewhat off the pyramid. | ||
| Right. And I think the pyramid system that you're seeing is similar to what Tesla was building with Eiffel at the Eiffel Tower and Wardenclyffe, where the Egyptians with the golden capstone would use the pyramids to transmit electricity and steer boats like how Nikola Tesla did. | ||
| That's how they found cocaine from South America in the noses of the ancient pharaohs and South American crops because they were able to travel around the entire world with that technology. | ||
| And in L.A. | ||
| recently, they dug up in the backyard granite sarcophagus filled with Egyptian artifacts, and they find them all over. | ||
| It's all the buried history stuff. | ||
| And with Mars, you were talking about Mars and Phobos and the obelisk there, which I told you guys about before. | ||
| And you didn't mention that the Ruskies sent a probe over there, And the griffies were like, what the heck? | ||
| You know, let's send another one. | ||
| We messed up. | ||
| It was the engineers. | ||
| They sent a second probe and the obelisk shut that one down, even though it had shielding and protection and everything. | ||
| So something definitely going on on Mars there. | ||
| Then on the surface, you know, you have caverns that are even bigger than the ones found in Egypt underground. | ||
| some of them with 15,000-foot ceilings underground, which is crazy, a cavern underground from Olympus Mons, the volcano there. | ||
| So I definitely think we should build a space elevator and help Musk to get to Mars and crack these cases, figure out what's going on, all these mysteries of the universe. | ||
| these wild conspiracy theories closing once for all you know we should be doing ground penetrating radar in the chicago under new york under epstein island all over you know and it seems like it's just being slow rolled like the epstein documents just creeps me out yeah you know like it's | ||
| another layer it's absolutely it's absolutely fascinating it's one of the things where if you've looked into this stuff it's like you know there's a reason why you know the masons uh say they they originated in egypt there's a reason why you can find accounts | ||
| from all the way back in like the 1920s when access to the pyramids was a lot more open and people like there'd be a guide that would take you up to the top of the pyramid and would hold out a uh light bulb and the light bulb would light up even though | ||
| it wasn't plugged into anything because of the electricity moving around or the images that you've seen of the pyramids in mexico with what looks like lasers shooting out of it and then the the structures that they find under the pyramids look just like the images of the uh | ||
| the beams coming out of the pyramids in mexico there there's definitely something to it there's definitely something going on there and you know it's one of the things where if you you sort of start the assumption of like hey the uh you know the pyramids are a giant machine there they have something to do with energy it might seem absurd but then like the more you look into it the more things seemingly align with that reality so i don't know yeah the more we look into it the more it | ||
| confirmed and and more A lot of great stuff. | ||
| Let's go to Willie in California. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. | ||
| Willie, you're on the air about the vaccine conversation that we're viewing earlier. | ||
| Hey, Harrison. | ||
| Yeah, words matter. | ||
| We know when the definition no longer fits the narrative, we just change the definition. | ||
| You know, we got to quit using the word vaccine for mRNA technology. | ||
| You know, it's really a medical device with nanotechnology to deliver a payload of RNA instructions. | ||
| And this emergency use authorization, which should legally not be possible anymore when alternative therapies like ivermectin are now being approved for possible over-the-counter status in several cases, several state cases. | ||
| Yeah, and under the EU, you know, because of lowered manufacturing standards we've forgotten Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Everything around the vaccine has just been utterly absurd. | ||
| I mean, maybe we just, instead of arguing about it, we'll just play this, this skit that I did. | ||
| Cause it, all of this has been known forever, right? | ||
| None of this stuff is like a surprise to us. | ||
| It's, it's weird seeing people admit what we've known about the vaccine and about COVID all along, but they don't seem to ever, you know, take it to the logical conclusion of this was all on purpose, all by design. | ||
| And we're being ruled by a consortium of the most evil people in the entire world. | ||
| Thank you very much for the call, Willie. | ||
| You're exactly right. | ||
| mRNA shots are not vaccines, and we really shouldn't call them that. | ||
| It's hard to talk about things, though, if all the words are wrong. | ||
| Let's go now to Josh in Georgia. | ||
| Josh, you want to talk about the bust that hit Virginia Jufri, the Epstein accuser, the Prince Andrew accuser. | ||
| Apparently now has three days to live after she was in a very bizarre car crash where a bus going in, and somebody correct me, 100 kilometers per hour. | ||
| I think it was actually 110 kilometers per hour. | ||
| So what that is in miles, who's to say? | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| Nobody. Josh, thanks for calling in. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Hey, good morning, Harrison. | ||
| First, I wanted to just say Biden was right about one thing. | ||
| That corn pop is bad, dude. | ||
| He's a tough cookie, I'll tell you that. | ||
| Yeah, I ain't messing with him. | ||
| That's not really what I called in about. | ||
| I was just going to make a little joke, like I was going to give you a Steven Crowder-level admonish on that, that it wasn't miles per hour. | ||
| It's about 50 miles per hour, that 110 kilometers. | ||
| But the whole thing is still 68. The crew says 68 miles per hour. | ||
| Right. Yeah, that's still a little fast for a bus. | ||
| Pretty fast, yeah. | ||
| And to say, you've got four days to live, that sounds like she's going to be putting a hiding. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I'm just, that's just me talking. | ||
| Um, yeah. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I've never heard of, of that. | ||
| I've never, I mean, four days, it's like very, very exact amount of time. | ||
| I don't know, man. | ||
| I've never heard somebody get in a car wreck and be like, I have five days to live. | ||
| Like what? | ||
| Either it's like, you know, We're keeping her alive as much as possible and she's only gonna last hours like you know she's not gonna make it through the night or it's like you know we're stabilizing I mean it's just it's so weird to me it's like yeah I got in this car crash now my kidneys are failing and I'll be dead in four days like I've never heard of that happening in my personal life or in the news it's very bizarre to me. | ||
| Um, so I did call in about another topic. | ||
| It was kind of stupid and just obvious. | ||
| It's like, well, it's easy to get consensus if you silence all the critics. | ||
| But since I've been waiting on hold, I want to talk about something else real quick, about that kid, you know, who can't get into college. | ||
| Well, it seems to me like, you know, you're saying you're doing him to a life of smoking weed and playing games. | ||
| He's already created a video game. | ||
| He's got the work ethic of Donald Trump. | ||
| He's ultra brilliant. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why even go to Harvard where Free Thought dies? | |
| Why not just start making your own company in your garage? | ||
| You've already got a video game out, making money on it. | ||
| Make your own video game company. | ||
| He's that smart, and you can go to tech school, or you can go find people and have clubs. | ||
| There's many, many ways around. | ||
| Just going to the indoctrination centers, you know? | ||
| You're exactly right. | ||
| It's just the problem is that like, if he wants to do that, you know, that's always a possibility. | ||
| And it's not like, you know, him going to Harvard means that he can't found his own company. | ||
| You know, obviously there's, he's going to be, they're going to try to, you know, slot him in to where they think he belongs. | ||
| But like, you know, that's always a possibility. | ||
| And it's just, It's like if that's what he wants to do. | ||
| He can do that, but that's a lot of risk. | ||
| It's a lot of a lot of difficult and you can do it and people do it and they should do it and I wish more people would do it. | ||
| But why should that be his only option? | ||
| Like that's always an option. | ||
| Why should that be his only option and you know, some people want to want to try to go the entrepreneurial route, but it's extremely risky and especially smart people like they're gonna be like well, you know, I'm gonna weigh the It's | ||
| the fact that that possibility is being removed from him. | ||
| This discrimination is everywhere. | ||
| It's not just the college applications. | ||
| Bank loans are going to be denied to him or government subsidies are going to be withheld from him because he's not a black transgender Pacific Islander, right? | ||
| So it's just being disadvantaged at every pass and constantly having to, like, it's, it's almost funny. | ||
| It's definitely ironic because the whole argument for affirmative action is like, Well, black people can achieve just as much as white people, but they have to just like work twice as hard to get the same amount. | ||
| And it's like, first of all, that's not true. | ||
| It's not the case because it's illegal to discriminate. | ||
| That is the case with white kids. | ||
| White kids do literally have to do a hell of a lot more and are constantly being disadvantaged, not just in school applications and job applications, but in loan applications or small business subsidies, all these things that are You know, denoted, it's the women's small business, women-owned companies, and we'll promote you if you're a black-owned company, but not if you're a white-owned company. | ||
| So, you know, it sucks, but the best way for him to succeed, for this kid to succeed, would be like, find a black guy that you can say owns your company, and then get all the subsidies and benefits through that. | ||
| We're a black-owned business, and just have him as a figurehead, pay him $50,000 a year to, you know, get all the government grants flowing your way. | ||
| Because literally you have to you have to pretend not to be white in order to succeed with the completely corrupted fake Distorted capitalism that we run here. | ||
| You see what I mean Josh? | ||
| So I agree with I totally agree with you I think the kid will probably be fine I've just I've seen enough people Like when you put in the effort that that kid put in to get the CV that he already has graduating high school But then he just ends up in some state school trying to get a job We're good to | ||
| go. Well, this is what I think about that. | ||
| You can say, well, he's being set up for failure, but that to me is a victim mentality, and that he's only being set up for failure if he wants to go down the path that he's told to do to be a slave to somebody else. | ||
| But I think that personally, I think his best option, he's a go-getter. | ||
| He's a motivated kid. | ||
| I think his best option is to do it on his own. | ||
| And the reward for that rather than the reward of 30 years of service only maybe being beat Yeah. What, | ||
| what, what if he takes this and says, it's like, okay, I was just watching a value payment and they're talking about Michael Jordan was cut from his high school basketball team. | ||
| He wasn't even a first drafted, but now he's the best basketball player of all time. | ||
| You know, whereas LeBron James was handed everything and he's just a whiny little biznatch and handed everything. | ||
| If you're handed, okay. | ||
| He wasn't, he wouldn't have been handed the, the Harvard entrance. | ||
| He worked for it, but then what would he do at Harvard? | ||
| He'd be indoctrinated into, you suck, you're stupid. | ||
| That's sort of the issue. | ||
| What we're dealing with here is two different problems, or two different angles on the problem. | ||
| On the individual level, what's best for that kid is not to worry about getting into Harvard, not to sweat that stuff. | ||
| I think you're right. | ||
| Founding his own company, getting a head start. | ||
| Not wasting those four years at state school, but instead just, you know, founding a company and getting experience under his belt. | ||
| I think you're right on the individual level, but on the societal, like, systematic level, America used to have a system by which exceptional students, people capable of exceptional thinking and accomplishment were identified by their school, given extra resources, extra support, They were then funneled into a university system where they were given the best education they possibly could. | ||
| And they were funneled, or you know, the corporations chose from these Ivy Leagues, the best people to be slotted into positions where they can take that talent and the resourcefulness and the, you know, above and beyond characteristic that these people show. | ||
| And they can be applied to our biggest corporations, our most important endeavors. | ||
| And like, you know, the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts because you have All these brilliant people, identified early, given extra resources, funneled up to positions of power, and able to use their talents and capabilities for the benefit of everybody. | ||
| Now, the most talented, resourceful, innovative, entrepreneurial people are instead being kneecapped, like they're being hobbled. | ||
| They're, instead of being given extra resources, They're having resources taken away because you have an unfair advantage because you grew up in a house with parents that read to you. | ||
| So therefore, you have to be disadvantaged to make up for the fact that you do better than everybody else. | ||
| It's this drive towards the lowest common denominator and handicapping ourselves by disadvantaging the most capable people in our society and not allowing them to put their talents to the best use in whatever industry or, you know, activity that they, you know, could really contribute in. | ||
| Instead, they're just being discriminated against and disadvantaged and disenfranchised and left on their own. | ||
| Some people are exceptional and will make it on their own. | ||
| and as a collection of broken and not fit for purpose at this point. | ||
| So you have, and again, so it's not just about this one kid. | ||
| It's about the... | ||
| Tens of millions of young guys out there that are being discriminated against constantly disadvantaged constantly still achieve great things But are not allowed to you know use their talents for the benefit of America because they're not the right skin color, | ||
| so it's absurd and it all needs to be reformatted and We should really wipe the slate clean when it comes to the We're good to go! | ||
| captured and warped at this point. | ||
| But I would like to live in a country where our best and brightest are provided pathways to employ those talents and skills in the biggest possible arenas. | ||
| Instead, it's like the best and the brightest. | ||
| Again, just as a society, is that really what you want? | ||
| You want this incredibly talented, motivated, accomplished kid. | ||
| You have two options. | ||
| Either you can have him join a collection of other really accomplished, motivated people, and together they can build this great company, or you want to just, like, strip him of any connections, deprive him of any, you know, stepping stone path towards greatness, and just go, you're on your own, good luck. | ||
| It's just like, yeah, he can succeed. | ||
| I'm sure he can. | ||
| But our entire society was built around the idea that these types of exceptionally meritorious people could benefit our country and should be given every resource available. | ||
| Instead, that's been inverted. | ||
| We're now the least accomplished, the least capable people who get the vast majority of resources spent on them, just trying to get them up to average. | ||
| While the people that are above average are either allowed to languish or actually brought down to average because inequality is the biggest evil. | ||
| So it's all sick and stupid. | ||
| Thanks for the call, Josh. | ||
| Let's go to Judy in Florida. | ||
| Judy in Florida on line four. | ||
| Go ahead on Vaccine Scamble. | ||
| Yeah, I just want to take it from the 30,000 foot view, I guess. | ||
| When I was watching what you were showing in the debate, it's perfectly obvious to me that that so-called doctor, which is nothing more than another version of Patrick Bateman, Right. | ||
| is insulting people. | ||
| When you condescend to people, all you're doing is insulting them. | ||
| And the actual human suffering, of course, that they're enduring... | ||
| Right. I wanted to point out also, the Hispanic guy that he was first talking with, this fake doctor, I happened to see him on the whatever podcast on Sunday, and I watched it for a little while. | ||
| This guy is a really staunch Christian and a debater, and it was the fact that he mentioned Yeah. | ||
| and talking about absolute truth with what they call 304s or women that are just – they don't look out for their own best interests because they're that much of a degenerate. | ||
| It's very sad to watch. | ||
| But it was a shame that he couldn't go far enough in talking to that pretty boy about mRNA. | ||
| mRNA technology. | ||
| Because, I mean, maybe that would have short-circuited this guy's brain. | ||
| Okay, you know, how do I talk about the fact that it's not a vaccine, but, you know, actually people are, you know, their whole genetics are being damaged and changed. | ||
| And it's, you know, and I'd like to point out one other thing. | ||
| You know, we have to go back to the fact that, you know, it was for the West that the doses were given. | ||
| The people that were coming in illegally were not required. | ||
| Yeah. So, you know, you know, in this 30,000 foot view, What you see is we're being dehumanized and being depopulated. | ||
| And we hear about these wonderful... | ||
| I'm going to go to white men. | ||
| Excuse me. | ||
| Sorry, Asians. | ||
| I'm not going to talk about you. | ||
| You look at these wonderful white men like you, my son, John Doyle, Elijah Schaefer. | ||
| The list goes on, right? | ||
| You think about all these people that are pouring into the discourse, just how we're being systematically Dehumanized, and then, you know, later on depopulated, you know, yeah, let's get back to absolute truth, and people are going to have to discern that for themselves. | ||
| My favorite scripture right now, and it's funny, it's April Fool's Day, is 2 Thessalonians 2, 3. People can go look up, you know, that scripture on their own. | ||
| But the, you know, but here's a headline. | ||
| Just, and I hope this is an April Fool's Day joke, but it is a news agency out of the UK that is talking about it, is that a toddler, two to four years of age, was suspended from a nursery after being accused of being transphobic. | ||
| I have the story right here, and we'll close out the show with this. | ||
| Here's 2 Thessalonians 2, 3, let no one in any way deceive you, for it will not come unless the Apostasy comes first and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction. | ||
| Here's the story you're talking about. | ||
| UK nursery suspends toddler over transphobia. | ||
| A toddler between the ages of two and four years old has been suspended from a nursery in the United Kingdom after being confused of transphobia and homophobia. | ||
| If a writer had pitched this story to The Onion a decade ago, the satire site wouldn't have touched it with a 10-foot pole. | ||
| It would have been too ridiculous. | ||
| But in 2025, it is merely the latest episode in the insane cultural experiment that trans activists and their institutional allies have inflicted upon the West. | ||
| According to data for the Department of Education obtained by The Telegraph through a Freedom of Information request, a child of either three or four years of age was suspended from a UK state school during the 2023-2022 academic year for abuse against sexual orientation and gender identity. | ||
| A toddler was kicked out of school for anti-LGBT bigotry. | ||
| Understandably, the unnamed school in question did not provide any further details of the toddler's suspension, but the Independent noted that data does show 94 pupils at the state's primary schools were suspended or permanently excluded for homophobia or transphobia in 2022 and 2023, and 10 of the suspended pupils were from year one and there were And there were from year two where the maximum age is seven. | ||
| So, hundreds of toddlers suspended from school for not being gay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
| InfoWars.com forward slash go. | ||
| Methylene blue is all the rage. | ||
| But for my listeners, we've been talking about it for decades. | ||
| But finally, they've got factories. | ||
| They've got laboratories that are producing medical, pharmaceutical, USP-grade. | ||
| And so, our sponsor, thealexshowstore.com, has it right now. | ||
| The very highest quality. | ||
| And I've taken USP-grade before, and they claim it's USP-grade and it works great. | ||
| Massive energy, clarity, focus, don't let down. | ||
| This is ten times better. | ||
| I'm actually scared of this. | ||
| I've seen Robert F. Kennedy Jr. take three droppers in Air Force One. | ||
| I took half a dropper and I'm bouncing off the walls hours later. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, we have the very best methylene blue I've ever had at the lowest price and it funds the Info War. | ||
| A total 360 win. |
Export Selection