All Episodes
March 7, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:36:15
The American Journal: Ukraine Asks For Air, Sea Truce After Massive Russian Strike & Trump Calls For Global Denuclearization - FULL SHOW - 03/07/2025
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
02:15:44
Appearances
a
alex jones
01:04
m
marc morano
01:03
Clips
a
abby phillip
00:02
e
eva vlaardingerbroek
00:29
h
hillary clinton
00:24
j
joe rogan
00:38
j
jon bowne
00:19
k
klaus schwab
00:28
k
konstantin kisin
00:59
s
scott jennings
00:28
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
alex jones
None dare call it conspiracy and many, many others like Cleon Skousen's The Naked Communist.
And then reading the New American Magazine predicting what the world government would look like from their own documents and getting heavily into the UN's library.
And thinking, man, this is really fantastical.
This is really totalitarian.
This is really transhumanist.
This is incredibly dangerous and looks like Brave New World.
And then I read Brave New World.
Then I read Brave New World Revisited, which is nonfiction.
And there was Aldous Huxley, whose brother founded the UN, Julian Huxley, and was the head of the World Eugenics Society and later the first transhumanist, saying in the 50s, we're going to end the sexes, break up the families, and turn humans into factory farm-produced creatures that we control.
jon bowne
The globalists have already clearly telegraphed that they are behind an inevitable black swan event, and the rabbit hole is deep.
hillary clinton
But we also have to look ahead.
Because you know what?
Our opponents certainly are.
Right-wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential election.
And they're not making a secret of it.
unidentified
Larry Fink of BlackRock sent a letter out to the world saying that ESG is a priority for the asset manager and really was looking to encourage companies to embrace ESG. I believe there will be a future, Eric, that all investments are going to be looked through sustainability.
The concept of providing Canadians with a universal basic income has sparked significant debate on if UBI is a viable solution for ensuring financial security.
The EU is investigating Elon Musk's ex, formerly known as Twitter, while the bloc's regulator is probing the social media platform for its suspected failure to counter illicit content and disinformation, a lack of advertising transparency and...
What it calls a suspected deceptive design of the user interface.
And if Homeland Security, the FBI and law enforcement in the US, they're not a company founded by Americans, by the way.
They're all like veterans and still...
Active, more or less, of Israeli intelligence services.
And they basically conducted these simulations of what types of hacks and events, cyber attacks, could trigger the cancellation of a U.S. presidential election and the declaration of martial law.
eva vlaardingerbroek
So remember how I said earlier in this speech that the farmers need to give up their farms before 2030, specifically that year?
Yeah, so that's not a coincidence.
That year doesn't come out of nowhere.
So that year is basically the deadline that our global elites have given our country and will probably give you to abide by these new regulations.
And that agenda is called the 2030 Agenda.
klaus schwab
And the world will look differently after we have gone through this transition process.
marc morano
He's talking about us essentially giving up individual national sovereignty and giving up individual freedoms and turning over rule to experts.
The Great Reset, the World Economic Forum, this whole agenda is to make it so we have no choice on some of the biggest questions of our lives.
But all of this is happening because at these meetings, like the World Economic Forum and the United Nations, they meet and they work with government corporate collusion to bypass democracy.
And in a simple sentence, the Great Reset.
is basically making the once free West Copy the same model as one-party Chinese authoritarian rule.
That is the Great Reset.
They bypass democracy and impose stuff through this corporate government fascism.
And we get told what's happening.
We don't get to vote on it.
There's no hearings in Congress.
There's no town halls.
There's no switchboards lighting up for a big vote.
None of it.
We're just told.
The car is gone.
Your meat-eating is going.
We're creating energy shortages.
Sorry, you need a vaccine to go into this place.
Sorry, your schools are closed.
Churches are closed.
What?
unidentified
Huh?
marc morano
How did that happen?
klaus schwab
The objective is to quickly recognize the potential of new technologies as well as develop the necessary ethical and political frameworks around those new technologies to ensure that those technologies are human-centered and society-oriented.
jon bowne
Unfortunately for this club of doom-addicted would-be murderous tyrants, Pandora's box has been opened, and we know exactly who opened it.
John Bowden.
unidentified
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the American Journal.
harrison smith
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
Coming to you live this Friday morning from the Infowars headquarters.
I feel low.
Am I low?
I feel short.
We got a lot of stuff to talk about today, obviously.
Lots of news across the board.
We got tariff news and some more news about Ukraine.
We have basically Russia's response to the warmongering, saber-rattling impotence of Europe.
So we'll talk about that.
I think we might also have to talk about the Jews.
I think we might, since that seems to be the only topic of conversation online right now.
And so I guess we'll engage.
I guess we'll engage in that.
But obviously it's not been a great year.
It's not been a great year for the Jewish faith or the state of Israel.
And all seems to be coming to a head.
unidentified
And...
harrison smith
I mean, part of me is just like, can we just stop talking?
Can we just stop talking about it already?
I mean, my God, really?
Why is...
It's like...
It's like even worse than transgenderism.
It's like, why is this suddenly the only thing anybody cares about all the time?
I'm sick of it.
I don't want to talk about it.
At the same time...
It's like, okay, we're sick of talking about it, so can we come to some conclusions?
Can we settle the argument once and for all and just move on?
And also, I feel a bit of responsibility in this, seeing as I have not only this position, but I think a very unique position on the whole thing, considering the fact that I'm...
I grew up around Jews and am intimately familiar with their culture and way of life and mindset and, you know, traditions and everything.
Well, at the same time, I'm not Jewish and don't uphold them as particularly special more than any other group of people.
I feel like there's a lot of voices on the topic, none of them even remotely reasonable or nuanced.
So maybe...
Maybe I have a responsibility to do this.
Maybe we'll take your calls and talk about it that way.
I don't know.
But the topic is massive and unrelenting.
And again, it's not like it's coming from the anti-Jew people.
It's because every day we wake up to some new limitation on the First Amendment or geopolitical entanglement or something else.
That always is predicated on anti-Semitism or Israel.
It's just like, enough.
Enough already.
But it also just obviously plays into domestic politics in general as basically they've just decided to go.
I think what's happened here is I think these groups like ADL and AIPAC and stuff, these are left-wing groups, right?
So what they're doing, even though they Control both sides and have, you know, equal support on both sides.
In general, these are left-wing, culturally left-wing groups, and so they're passing all of the really unpopular and outrageous anti-Semitism bill stuff under the Republicans, sort of for a two-part attack, basically.
Is you pass the unpopular stuff under the Republicans so you can point to the Republicans and go, see, they don't actually love free speech.
They're hypocrites.
They're passing these anti-Semitism laws.
And, you know, obviously with October 7th and all the protests and everything, like the left wing now is largely or whatever, you would consider them being like on the Palestinian side of that argument.
And so you can sort of feed them red meat and go, yeah, it's the Republicans that are the bad guys because they're passing all these.
Laws to deport anti-Semites and evict your friends from college for speaking up against genocide.
So I think they're using the Republican Party to pass all this stuff, partly to damage the Republican Party, partly to get the laws passed, obviously.
And also to infuriate and enrage the right-wing who don't love...
Israel more than life itself.
Drive them away, drive a wedge in between, you know, the right wing.
Because at the end of the day, I genuinely, okay, just the hatred is the trap they want people to fall into.
It's really not that complicated or hard to understand.
And again, it's like, I don't even want to talk about this, but this is what everybody's saying.
You've got Joel Berry, who, I mean, every time I see him on my timeline, like, I don't know what he, okay, he's the managing editor of Babylon Bee.
All right, that makes sense.
All right, that makes a little bit more sense.
I don't even know who this guy was.
It's just like, to me, his existence is solely just like telling people to stop talking about Jews.
That's like all I ever see him do.
I guess he's editor of Babylon Bee.
All right, that makes sense.
And he says, Jew hate is the new wokeness.
And a lot of people respond to this just by being like, yeah, we do hate Jews.
And it's just like, really?
You're really gonna fall?
You're really gonna just fall headlong into that trap, are you?
You're gonna dive headfirst into that big spike pit.
That's obvious and right in front of you.
It's a false dichotomy.
You don't hate Jews to talk about Israel slaughtering Palestinians.
It doesn't mean you hate Jews to talk about Israel's bizarre connections to the JFK assassination.
Or talk about Leslie Wexner funding a Jewish philanthropy supergroup that just so happens to be replete with the satanic pedophiles.
This is the false dichotomy.
The false dichotomy is you either can never question Jews and uphold them as perfect chosen people who disagreeing with is a sin or you hate them and want them all murdered.
And it's like, really, this is the dichotomy?
These are our options that we have to know?
It's not.
This is stupid.
This is stupid and ridiculous and wrong and it's purposeful.
It's obvious and it's purposeful.
And so we'll have to get into it.
We'll have to talk about it.
Even though it is infinitely complicated and not fun and it offends everybody.
We'll have to do it.
We'll have to do it.
Because saying Jew hate is the new wokeness is just a very dumb thing to say.
It's always interesting.
And by the way, we pointed this out like a year ago because it was the president of the, I think it's called the American Jewish Congress.
This dude that straight up looks like a skeleton.
He's one of the creepiest looking dudes I've ever seen.
And he puts out a video going, it's not anti-Semitism, it's Jew hatred.
And it like zooms in on his face.
And he's like, hatred!
It's Jew hatred!
And so it's like, we've been saying for a long time, like, alright, the phrase anti-Semitism is losing its power.
And so they're moving on to...
Jew-hate, that is the new phrase.
Because I think part of the reason that anti-Semitism has lost its powers is because it doesn't have hate embedded in the word.
And so if you're saying things are anti-Semitic that are just like facts or reality, then it doesn't have the same oomph.
Can facts be anti-Semitic?
Right?
If I say that...
Jeffrey Epstein was working for Mossad.
Is that anti-Semitic or is it just a fact?
And if it's just a fact, then how can it be hateful?
And so anti-Semitism isn't hateful.
It just means talking badly about Jews.
So they had to rebrand.
And so Jew hatred is the new term.
So apparently criticizing a foreign nation state or questioning the motives of Americans means you hate all Jews.
And that's a stupid dichotomy.
That plays right into the hands of the bad people who want to use Jew hatred to both control Jews and silence non-Jews.
So I guess we'll stop talking about talking about it and actually talk about it in just a second.
Let's begin today, though, as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch.
For Friday, the 7th of March, 2025, Trump puts new limits on Elon Musk's authority amid backlash to Doge cuts.
President Donald Trump said he told his cabinet secretaries during a meeting Thursday that staffing decisions will be left up to them, not Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency.
Trump said he instructed cabinet members to work alongside Doge on spending and workforce reductions while clarifying that job cuts will be at the discretion of department leaders.
We just had a meeting with most of the secretaries, Elon and others, and it was a very positive one, Trump said on Truth Social.
It's very important that we cut levels down to where they need to be, but it's also important to keep the best and most productive people.
As secretaries learn about and understand people working for various departments, they can be very precise as to who will remain, who will go.
We say the scalpel rather than the hatchet, Trump added.
So, Trump's message was also a rare public curtailing of Musk's authority as he moves to help reshape the federal government at times stepping on the cabinet secretary's toes.
Several members of Trump's cabinet bristled when Musk recently ordered federal employees to outline their work or face termination with multiple agencies and departments initially fending off the effort.
At the same time, Trump also praised Musk and Doge after Thursday's meeting.
I think they've done an amazing job, he told reporters.
And again, I think at least part of this has to be that Musk is serving as a lightning rod for Trump and taking a lot of the heat.
Meanwhile, Moscow reacts fiercely to Macron's nuclear rhetoric, calling it nuclear blackmail.
What can France's 290 warheads do against a massive 6,000-strong Russian arsenal?
It looks like French President Emmanuel Macron finally managed to insert himself smack dab in the middle of the peace process debate and the resolution of the Ukraine war in the worst possible way.
By floating the idea of using a nuclear umbrella of the limited French arsenal, Macron demission managed to enrage the Russians.
The Russian Foreign Ministry accused French President Emmanuel Macron of nuclear blackmail and stated that he finally, quote, removed the mask and reveals who is leading the war party today.
Russia has never threatened France and even helped defend its independence during both world wars, but Macron's remarks pose a threat to Russia.
Macron's offer of a nuclear umbrella to Europe will not strengthen the security of France or its allies.
Paris still has no intention of taking Russia's vital interests into account and aims to force Moscow to make decisions that suit the West.
Now look, I'm a Christian, so I don't necessarily believe in...
You know, signs and omens in the way that, you know, maybe an ancient pagan would.
At the same time, things keep happening that I think maybe are signals from God.
I think maybe we're missing gigantic flashing red signals from the Lord of the Universe because, I don't know if you guys remember, but very early on in the Ukraine war, a dam was bombed and water rushed out over these fields, stripping off the top layer of soil.
Leaving behind fields of German skulls from World War II. And there was videos of...
You couldn't even animate it better.
Literally the image of screaming skulls coming up from the soil of Ukraine.
As a warning to avoid a world war.
Literal bones of fields washing up.
At the outbreak of this conflict, we covered it at the time, going, maybe this is an omen.
Maybe it's an omen when you start a conflict, the first major European land war since World War II, and the ghosts of your ancestors are literally emerging from the ground with screaming looks on their faces and helmets on their skulls, warning you to not go down the path of death.
Yeah, maybe we should have listened.
Well, it just so happens that today, as France inserts itself into the Ukrainian conflict, as Moscow responds, belittling their nuclear saber rattling, just today, every train from England to France had to be halted as a giant operation has been mounted to remove an unexploded World War II ordinance that has just been discovered.
Maybe it's another omen.
Maybe it's another sign.
Maybe it's another signal from God of, like, look at what has happened in the past.
Look at the damage that has been wrought.
We are 80 years on, and we're still finding unexploded ordnance from that human catastrophe.
Do we really want to do this again?
We really want to start this up again?
World War II bomb found on tracks in Paris, Gare du Nord train station, halting traffic.
Unexpected ordinance found in the middle of the tracks during maintenance work, all trains to the station, including Eurostar, are stopped.
So, you know, saying maybe when God flips the neon sign on, we should read it.
That's my take on these things.
Do we really want to engage in yet another conflict when last time...
Without 80 years of technological development and killing machines, the massacres were so monumental, the chaos and devastation so widespread that even now, nearly 100 years after the conflict, we're still finding unexploded ordnance littering the fields of Europe.
There are still entire swaths of France.
That it would be so difficult to remove all the ordinances, they instead just decided to rope it off and pretend the land doesn't exist.
It just doesn't exist.
No one's ever going to be allowed to go there ever again.
It's just consigned forever to barrenness because of all of the bombs that haven't been exploded and are impossible to dig up.
So, let's not have another world war, I guess is what I'm saying.
I guess, long story short, let's not do that again, okay?
Meanwhile, Trump tariffs.
U.S. pauses tariffs on some Canadian-Mexican imports until April 2nd.
U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order in the Oval Office.
While this has been a week of retaliatory actions, warning of price hikes from businesses and wild price swings in the market, investors and business leaders on edge about an escalating trade war continue to monitor the fast-paced headlines from the Trump administration.
Trump's tariffs still apply to a large number of Canadian-Mexican goods despite exemption.
But they are exempting some goods, goods that are compliant with the United States-Mexico agreement.
The deal negotiated during Trump's first term that governs trade in North America.
A White House official told CNBC that only about 50% of Mexican imports and 38% of Canadian imports are USMCA compliant.
But that's good news for them.
They can just become compliant and then be welcomed into our market once again.
It's funny you see people talking about...
If you're putting an import tax on these cars, these cars are made abroad, that means that your truck that would have been $20,000 is now $30,000.
And this is outrageous.
And it's like, you could buy an American-made one.
Well, you could just buy an American-made one.
So it's like, okay, companies that have already done this, you know, Toyota did this.
They used to build their cars in Japan because of tariffs and other trade agreements.
They decided it was actually...
More beneficial to their bottom line to build in America.
So that's what they started doing.
So if you want to buy a car and not have a 10% surcharge because of tariffs, then I guess buy a Toyota.
Buy a car that's built in America and isn't subject to tariffs.
And as more people buy cars that are built in America, those companies will do better.
And other car companies will move their manufacturing here to the United States to avoid the tariff and to gain that customer base.
That's interested in these types of things, you know, saving money.
And it will return manufacturing to America.
That is the point of all of it.
Again, we have cancer as a nation.
We are dying.
We have a terminal illness of globalism, free trade, immigration.
We're being robbed and just sucked dry at every possible turn.
So this is a form of cancer that we have.
And now we have to start on chemo treatments.
We have to start on radiation therapy.
So it's not fun.
No, radiation therapy is not something you do for fun.
It's something you do because you have to.
And while it's unpleasant, it's better than dying.
So that's where we're at.
U.S. House censors Democrat Al Green for protesting Trump's speech.
Representative Al Green of Texas shouted down President Trump during his joint address to the Joint House of Congress.
Now a handful of Democrats have actually joined the majority of Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday in voting to censure Democrat Al Green over shouting at President Donald Trump during his speech.
Green, a Texas Democrat who's repeatedly called to impeach Trump, faced the House censure resolution for yelling at the president, waving his black cane, and refusing to sit down during Trump's speech.
The resolution was approved 224-198 with 10 Democrats supporting the move.
Two Democrats voted president and four others did not vote.
Republicans control the chamber with three vacancies.
About two dozen Democrats singing the civil rights anthem, We Shall Overcome, surrounded Green and the chamber afterward, leaving U.S. Speaker Mike Johnson to gavel the House into recess and delaying the former censure motion.
I almost made that joke when this was going on.
I was real close when we were showing the video of Al Green.
I was real close to just being like, like a tree planted by the water.
Right?
Because it's ridiculous.
Because this is a ridiculous farce.
They're singing, we shall overcome, because some cranky old coot can't keep his emotions in check for 45 minutes to listen to his president give a speech.
This is the civil rights...
Action of your day.
This is the struggle continuing on.
Is this the legacy of Martin Luther King upheld?
Or is this retarded partisan politics with a tinge of racial insanity?
They're singing.
Can we find a video of that?
I'm going to put the crew on this.
Can we find a video of the Democrats singing We Shall Overcome about Al Green?
Waving his cane at Donald Trump.
Struggle.
Part of the struggle, brother.
unidentified
Okay, moving on.
harrison smith
Final story here.
Less than half of Americans now sympathetic towards Israelis.
Although Americans remain more likely to say their sympathies in the Middle East situation are with the Israelis rather than the Palestinians.
The 46% expressing support for Israel is the lowest in 25 years of Gallup's annual tracking of this measure on its World Affairs Survey.
The previous 51% low point in this trend of American sympathies for Israelis was recorded both last year and in 2001. At the same time, the 33% of U.S. adults who now say they sympathize with the Palestinians is up 6 percentage points from last year and the highest reading by 2 points.
Interesting, 2001 was the last time it was this high.
That's kind of interesting.
Didn't know that.
I think we're in danger.
I think we might be in danger.
Don't like Israel, huh?
Well, we'll show you what Israel's dealing with.
Islamic terror.
So obviously, when, you know, okay, so...
So we'll get back into this.
We'll talk about this because this is obviously behind a lot of what's going on.
And you have a lot of people aren't so happy about Israel because for the last year they've seen daily uploads of dismembered children and Israelis celebrating it.
And that's not conducive to friendly relations, unfortunately.
And so some people are accepting this and saying, gee, maybe I was wrong about Israel.
I always thought they were the moral, upright, calm party in this.
Maybe I'm wrong and I should look into this.
And they start traveling down that road.
Other large number of people are saying it's not the Israelis' fault.
It's not our fault.
It's not that these people are having a reasonable reaction.
It's that...
What is this?
It's that they're just allowed to talk about this, and they shouldn't be allowed to talk about it.
And so now we need to have censorship, which is only making everything worse and everything accelerate.
I think that's part of the plan.
unidentified
Stay with us.
- All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
and this is the American Journal.
unidentified
We got a lot of stuff still to talk about today.
harrison smith
I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls probably in the third hour.
I think we'll be joined by Chase in the second hour today.
He's coming in studio.
Maybe we'll take your calls with him in here as well.
But I guess we've got to do it.
I guess we've got to talk about anti-Semitism and Jewish stuff, I guess.
So I guess we'll do that now.
And I think a lot of...
A lot of what's happening, and I'm telling you, I genuinely like, I don't, it's all so complicated and difficult to talk about.
And people just become insane as soon as this topic comes up.
Really, it's a land of extremes and it's not helpful in any way to engage in that type of stuff.
But talking about it all is going to have people on both sides of the aisle.
Making insane claims about what your motivations are.
And you know, I guess I can explain this in part by trying to explain how one might become anti-Semitic.
Because there's a position now Well, there's something called celebration parallax.
At least that's a really good phrase for it.
That's a really good encapsulation of it, I think.
It's basically you can say the same thing two different times and one time can be celebrated and one time will be demonized and you'll be hated for it.
But you're saying the same thing.
The difference is whether you approve of the thing you're talking about or disapprove of the thing you're talking about.
So if you have an anti-Semite saying the Jews are behind Communism and homosexuality and pornography and all these things.
And this is because the Jews are doing this.
And it's like, whoa, dude, okay.
Hey, Hitler.
All right, you Nazi.
But I can show you video after video of Jews being like, Jews were the force behind the freedom to be gay.
And, you know, so it's like, all right.
So if you make a video as a Jew, Talking about how good it is that Jewish people were sort of the engine behind a lot of these societal trends.
Then it's good if you say exactly the same thing.
You say, I don't like those things.
Now you're a Nazi and you're just blaming Jews because you hate them.
And this is very, this is silly.
Either it's true or it's not.
And whether you like it or not doesn't determine whether it's true or not.
And that shouldn't be that complicated.
But one of the things that happens is...
People see things.
It doesn't start with anti-Semitism, I guess, is the point.
It doesn't start with hating Jews and then you decide to find things to hate them for.
It's not usually how it works.
Usually how it works is you got a young guy looking around and going, man, everything is freaking gay.
Why is everything so gay right now?
Why are all of my video games trying to tell me...
How brave transgender people are.
This has ruined everything.
This this insistence on on jackhammering homosexuality into everything all the time is really annoying and has seems to have gone hand in hand with the downfall of my favorite video games and movies and groups of friends.
This is horrible.
Maybe I'll look into what what started this whole movement and what you find is like the movement to decriminalize and normalize homosexuality is like primarily led by Jewish people.
Same thing with feminism, right?
You go, this whole feminism thing, I think this was all a scam.
I think this whole feminism movement was about getting women out of the house so they can be a tax-paying cog in a machine.
It's about getting kids away from their parents.
It's about all the...
Horrible downstream effects that the movement for feminism, which at the beginning, I could totally understand the sentiment of laws or rules or strictures boxing in what women can do that really aren't based off any...
I get how it starts, but now you see where it goes and you're like, man, this feminism thing really is messing everything up.
I'm going to look into who started this whole feminism movement.
And you go on Wikipedia, search feminist by religion.
And it's like 350 out of the original 400 top feminists were all Jewish.
Okay, so you find things that you're like, wow, this is destroying my country.
Let's look into it.
And you find out it's a lot of Jewish people behind it.
Again, this isn't a conspiracy.
It's not even a debatable fact.
And it's not something that Jews are shy about.
There's a lot of...
There's a lot of propaganda out there, you know, content out there celebrating this fact.
So is that so hard to understand that you go, well, this is kind of...
But then if you ask questions about it or if you, you know, think about, like, try to bring it up, then you're told that you're hateful and you're a bigot and all this stuff.
Yeah, the list of Jewish feminists, yeah, there...
It was most of them.
It was most of them.
And look, but I understand.
And this is what I try to express where, like, you don't have a full picture yet.
I'm just explaining how this happens, how this takes place, and you can't fault people for noticing this.
I don't know what other way to put it.
And it's fine, but then, you know, what ends up happening is...
If you bring this up or if you say, well, look, there, you know, looks like there's Jewish influence.
I mean, maybe it's good in some places, but I can tell here I don't like the outcome of what's happened.
So I'm against this.
And then you have, like, people that are really normal and reasonable 90% of the time when something like that comes up.
There's like, you just hate Jews and you shouldn't be allowed to have a bank account.
And frankly, I wouldn't care if you were killed.
And it's like, oh my God, what the hell is going on here?
And so then the reaction to it, you know, makes people smile out of control.
And it's especially, I think, sort of dangerous, this cycle of events, when you don't actually know any Jewish people.
Because then it's easy to see Jewish people as just like these people that the news talk about or that you read about on the internet.
What I said in response to this, Joel Berry saying, Jew hate is the new wokeness.
This is ridiculous.
My response to this was to emphasize, I love Jews as individuals and as a people.
I've been to enough Jewish holidays, weddings, bar mitzvahs, etc.
to gain a deep appreciation of their culture and their values.
And it's out of love for my Jewish friends that I tell you do not let the ADL and APAC censor speech or call for war in your name.
It's BS and it's not in your interest.
And again, I had people commenting on this being like, um, actually we hate them.
It's like, okay, fine.
I don't care.
I mean, you can hate whoever you want.
It's not my bag.
It's not what I do.
And I know enough Jews to genuinely have a good appreciation.
So again, I feel like I do have a bit of a responsibility to just even talk about this stuff because I guess nobody else has had these conversations with people.
But the Jews I know that I grew up with, let me tell you a little story about a neighborhood called Meyerland.
Meyerland was a neighborhood in Houston built after the Second World War.
To be a community for people who were driven out of their countries by the Nazis.
Came to America, many of them settled in Houston, and they built a neighborhood called Meyerland where there's kosher grocery stores and you see flyers and Hebrew.
It's a very Jewish neighborhood.
I didn't live in it.
I lived down the road, but a lot of my friends lived in it.
So I just grew up around Jews.
So it's like when you grow up around Jews and you're playing on your baseball team with them and you're going to school with them, you go sleepovers at their house.
It doesn't make any sense to be like, no, all Jews are evil.
It's like, no, but they're actually not.
That's actually just not true.
When you get to know them, it's just, that's an absurd thing to say.
And it's not like, you're just coping.
It's not coped to say that most Jews are decent, hardworking, loving, great people.
It's not coped to say that because it's, first of all, literally true.
It's also the experience that most people have with Jews.
Most people who know Jews are like, oh, that person?
Yeah, that dude's amazing.
He's super nice.
He's really good at his job.
He does charity work on the weekends.
And you're going to sit there and be like, actually, we hate Jews.
And it's like, okay, not only is it just wrong morally and factually, it's a terrible way to make an argument.
You are discrediting everything you're saying, even the stuff that you might believe that's true.
If it's all predicated on, you know, hate your next-door neighbor, nobody's going to listen to you.
And you're just discrediting anything actually credible you have to say.
Which, I don't know, it's not even like a tactic for me, but like, the false dichotomy is you either hate Jews or you love the ADL. You hate Jews or you love AIPAC. It's like, no, I can love Jews and hate AIPAC. I can actually do that.
I can actually love my Jewish friends.
And despise the ADL and want them destroyed completely and eradicated and made illegal.
We can actually do this.
And you can actually confront the mechanisms that are used by, in many cases, powerful Jews to stop people from talking about them by passing anti-Semitism laws.
And so, you know, especially like when you say you have appreciation of their culture.
And it's not a total black and white thing, obviously.
I have white friends like this.
I have black friends like this.
I have Jewish friends like this.
But for the most part, and the trend that I've seen, is my Jewish friends that get married young, stay married.
All of their parents are still married.
I don't have a lot of Jewish friends that parents are divorced.
You know, get good jobs, work really hard.
They actually go to synagogue every week.
A lot of my Christian friends, not a lot of them go to church all the time, but the Jews I know are very involved in their faith.
They're very connected to their community.
They're very, very close with their entire extended family.
And that is like a standout thing.
My Jewish friends, they see both sets of grandparents every weekend.
It's like a very weird thing if they don't spend extended periods of time.
With their grandparents every single weekend.
So you're going to say that's bad.
You're going to see that and say, actually, they're bad?
It's like, no.
I wish more people were like this.
I'm sure I've told this story before, but I was talking to a friend who was talking about getting a new job, and I was saying, well, are you going to stay in Dallas or are you going to go somewhere else?
If you're getting a new job, are you guys thinking of moving?
He's like, well, you know, Jews aren't that big of a pop...
You know, percentage of the population.
We were talking about Judaism.
We were talking about him getting a new job.
And he's like, well, you know, we like have a lot, you know, it wouldn't be that hard basically for me to get a job.
He had a, you know, he's like an accountant.
So he's like, yeah, I can pretty much get a job in any city in the world because we're no more than two or three degrees of separation from Jewish communities everywhere in the world.
So if I want to go to London.
Then I can go to my synagogue and go, hey, does anybody have any friends in London that can help me find a job?
And somebody in your community will say, oh yeah, my friend just moved there.
He said, here's how you get a job.
He said, there's an opening here.
Let me see if I can, you know, help you facilitate that.
And it's like, you know, is that a bad thing?
Is that a bad thing for my friend to have access to a religious community that can help him find a job overseas?
Is he a bad person for taking advantage of that?
I don't think so.
I'm kind of jealous of it.
Like, that'd be nice, wouldn't it?
Wouldn't that be nice to be one or two degrees of separation from somebody that can get you a job anywhere in the world?
That's pretty cool, actually.
And I don't blame them for experiencing that.
At the same time, if you have Jewish people around the world giving jobs to fellow Jews and deliberately excluding non-Jews from those positions...
Or showing nepotism or favoritism.
Then it can go too far and it can be a problem and that's not good.
And I think, you know, it's fine to guard against that and to not be in favor of that.
But these are the things that, like, you know, you might see from the outside and go, this is, it's a Jewish conspiracy.
They're all just giving it.
And it's like, okay, but put yourself in their shoes.
If you're a young dude involved in your community and know that they have connections all over the world, why wouldn't you do that?
Obviously you do that.
It's a good thing.
And it's not really hurting anybody.
Just like, you know, when I went and worked in D.C. for my uncle, that wasn't hurting anybody.
It was a little nepotistic, but I had the talent and ability to fulfill the role better than pretty much anybody else.
So it's not like it was DEI. It's not like you're degrading.
You know, it's still merit-based.
unidentified
Anyway.
harrison smith
These are the things that I guess people just don't have these conversations, don't understand this and how real it is.
Same type of thing where you've got Jewish friends that aren't super into Judaism, but some Jews are, and, you know, they'll tell me stories where it's like, you know, some other Jewish person finds out they're Jewish and is like, you're a part of the tribe, huh?
You and me, we're part of the tribe.
My other Jewish friend's like, ha-ha, yep.
Part of the tribe.
Cool.
Thanks.
They don't want anything to do with him.
Some Jews, they do.
They feel like, yeah, we're like the underground.
We're like behind enemy lines.
But most normal Jews are like, all right, dude.
Cool.
That's fine.
But they don't engage in it.
If you don't have this holistic understanding, then you can't.
And by the way, let me say, when I talk about Myerland, the friends I grew up with, Their grandparents, when they were five years old, had a perfectly normal, lovely, idealistic, picturesque childhoods until one day soldiers showed up, took them away, and they never saw their sisters ever again.
And so imagine growing up and you're hearing your grandmother, your grandfather tell these stories, showing you pictures, going, this is my sister.
Elena, I never saw her after we were sent to the camps.
And you can debate about statistics and numbers and can crematoria really process that many?
And it's like, it doesn't matter, dude.
You're talking about their family.
You're talking about their grandparents.
You're sitting there going, sorry, your grandma's a liar, okay?
It's like, no, she's not.
She never saw her sister again.
That was a tragedy.
That was horrific.
And it happened in a place where they thought they were safe and didn't think that that type of thing would happen.
So it's also kind of hard to sit there and go, dude, this is America.
That'll never happen to you.
They got their grandparents going, yeah, we thought that was the case with Greece, too.
We thought that was the case with Poland, also.
Turns out, things can flip on a dime.
And it's very real to them.
And again, you can't tell them that they're paranoid or stupid or, you know, believing propaganda for saying this.
It's like, no, it's literally their lived experience.
You can't argue them out of it or discredit it.
And you shouldn't even.
These are the things I don't think people understand, and it doesn't mean that you then think, okay, so therefore we have to deport anti-Semites.
You know, therefore, disagreeing with Israel means that your university shouldn't get government funds.
It's like, all right, there's an extremism at play here on both sides that is unhelpful and self-fulfilling and perpetuating.
Let's drop it.
And if we can just treat Jews like literally every other group of people, none of this would even be an issue.
And I'd love to get to that point in time.
We're just not there yet.
And hope maybe I can play a part in getting to that point.
Because you have stuff like this.
Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Kingsley Wilson is a prolific purveyor.
Of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
This is from JewishInsider.com.
Kingsley Wilson, the Pentagon's new deputy press secretary, is facing backlash over a series of recent social media comments in which she's promoted anti-Semitic conspiracy theories, opposed USAID to Israel, and amplified Kremlin talking points, among several other remarks that raise questions.
So what did she say?
Wilson attacked the Anti-Defamation League League for memorializing the lynching of Leo Frank, a Jewish man who's widely believed to have been wrongly convicted of raping and murdering a child over a century ago in Atlanta.
Not anti-Semitic, not a conspiracy theory.
Okay?
You can just reject this outright.
It's not a problem.
So what did she say?
Quote, Leo Frank raped and murdered a 13-year-old girl, Wilson wrote in response to the ADL in 2023, repeating her claim just over a year later.
He also tried to frame a black man for his crime.
The ADL is despicable.
Guess what?
All of that, 100% true.
100% true.
Leo Frank was lynched.
But not in the way that you think when you think of a lynching, right?
He was tried.
He was convicted.
He was sentenced to death.
And then a bunch of Jewish billionaires with a bunch of influence contacted the governor and asked that he be pardoned.
He wasn't innocent.
They didn't say he didn't do it.
He was falsely convicted.
Therefore, pardon him.
They said, he's Jewish.
We don't want him convicted of this.
We want to use our influence to protect him.
Will you pardon him?
And I'm sure some sort of quid pro quo went on.
And so the people of the community were outraged.
They were being robbed of justice for a little girl that had been raped and murdered, decided to carry out the lawful sentence on their own, despite the pardon of the governor, which was purchased by foreign interest to them, right?
People outside of their community going to the governor and getting them to pardon the rapist and murder of their daughter?
I don't think so.
That's not going to happen.
That's how the ADL got started.
That was their foundation.
That's how they were founded.
That's why they were founded.
Got him pardoned.
That was the ADL. That was what started the ADL, and that's what founded them.
And still to this day, they're defending Leo Frank.
And they're trying to destroy Kingsley Wilson's life for acknowledging this historical fact.
It's unacceptable.
That's insane.
That's stupid.
And that's the cause of anti-Semitism.
Okay?
It's not...
People don't see, okay, this Leo Frank guy raped a 13-year-old girl, therefore Jews are bad.
So Leo Frank raped this little girl, then a bunch of Jews got him pardoned, and then they formed the ADL, and the ADL to this day is still defending him for some reason, and Jewish people that are perfectly reasonable, and we totally agree on 99% of stuff, for some reason, feel like they're being attacked when the ADL is called out.
This is...
Mind control.
This is propaganda from the ADL convincing Jews that defending the ADL is defending themselves.
And it's not true.
It's a trick.
It's a lie.
And this type of stuff is happening all the time everywhere.
It's especially happening under the Trump administration.
It is derailing the Trump administration.
I think, again, part of that is literally the ADL and APAC, who are left-wing by definition, see a chance to use the right-wing to pass a bunch of unpopular, restrictive stuff.
So not only are you now using the anti-First Amendment people to curtail the First Amendment, in the same way they use the pro-freedom people to pass the Patriot Act in 2001. And so you're using the guards to get in, right?
You're using the people that would stand up against free speech curtailment by calling it anti-Semitic and getting them to go along with it, and you're infuriating the left wing, and you are driving a wedge between people on the right that don't want to curtail the First Amendment on behalf of the Jews and those who do.
It's not good for anybody.
And it doesn't matter who's trying to curtail the First Amendment.
The First Amendment is sacred in this country.
Judaism is not.
We have First Amendment for free speech and we have freedom of religion.
And freedom of religion is a wonderful thing.
Freedom of religion is why Jews get to practice Judaism in this country.
And it also, part and parcel with that, inextricable in that, is that it's legal to criticize Judaism.
And you can criticize the religion.
You can criticize the practitioners.
You can criticize the churches and the organizations and the books and the rights.
Everything.
You can criticize everything about it.
That is freedom of religion.
You can't have one or the other.
You have to have both.
Or else it's not freedom of religion.
It's religious intolerance, domination and oppression.
Okay, so...
If we just have principled stances and we just treat the Jews like literally everybody else, then it's all fine and we can stop the threats of the First Amendment, we can stop the genocide going on in Gaza, and we can stop the endless hundreds of billions of dollars being sent to Israel and robbed from us.
We can confront these mechanisms of exploitation and oppression and subversion.
And we can love Jews at the same time.
And there's no contradiction in that.
There's no dichotomy there.
Really not that complicated.
And, you know, it's both sides.
It's the people saying, actually, we do hate Jews.
And it's people saying, criticizing Israel means you hate Jews.
Both of these people are making everything worse for everybody.
And are stopping either side from, you know, coming to a place where we can actually amicably share a country.
We might be joined by Chase Naxauer, we might not.
Stay tuned to find out.
unidentified
We'll be right back.
joe rogan
The first video of his that really woke me up was the video he did on the World Trade Organization protests in Seattle.
When he showed that there was these groups of masked men who dressed in military uniforms with military issue shoes.
And they all ran around in this peaceful protest for the World Trade Organization and started smashing things and lighting things on fire and creating chaos, which allowed the police to then move in.
Then these people All holed up in one house.
They negotiated with the police and they were all released.
unidentified
While the labor march was large and peaceful, it was the unexpected violence that captured most of the media attention.
Innocent bystanders walking along the sidewalk are getting tear gassed.
And while the governor made assurances this morning things are back to normal, they're definitely not.
The state of emergency was just an hour old.
The state of emergency that they've been training for so long to deal with.
Who was behind it?
What caused it in Seattle in December of 1999?
The World Trade Organization meeting.
The riots, the supposed riots in the military and police working together to keep the public safe from all that evil rabble.
In recent years, the WTO, since its inception, has come across incredible opposition.
alex jones
Worldwide because of its obvious authoritarian implications.
unidentified
That's a hard thing to deal with when you've got highly motivated people that have real complaints and valid issues.
How do you deal with it?
Well, you simply call in your friends.
Nobody was directly confronting the police.
joe rogan
No one laid hands on anybody.
unidentified
Nobody touched property.
And they were arrested anyway solely because the WTO comes to town.
China and other foreign governments wander in here.
And now they're gassing everybody.
What did you see here?
Did you see any bile?
In downtown Seattle today, the First Amendment ended at Fourth and Spring.
Not only could you not say what's on your mind, you couldn't wear it.
Sir, sir, sir, let's not get into a big scuffle over here.
This man had an anti-WTO sticker on his backpack.
There are no protests down here.
You saw what happened yesterday to your city.
We're not going to let it happen again, okay?
Not allowed to have a sticker.
Not here.
The left coast communists posing as anarchists under Delta Force direction.
Broke windows at the gap.
hillary clinton
They're smashing windows at McDonald's.
They're dumping over garbage cans.
unidentified
What's wrong with this picture?
If the police are supposedly there to protect the public and property, then why?
Why did state police, Seattle police, as well as the feds, stand back and allow the anarchists, en masse, to run around and throw bottles at police, cones, rocks, you name it, and assault private property, as well as members of the general public?
You see, the anarchists were actually given their own operations base.
Seven days after they commandeered this downtown building, anarchists walked away without a word from police.
It feels to me like we won.
The building is owned by the Low Income Housing Institute, a private nonprofit that is in large part funded by the city and is now working with the city to house the anarchists.
alex jones
All started by 30 to 40 anarchists running around, burning and beating and smashing and stealing.
unidentified
And the police, like dogs at the end of a chain, a Rottweiler you've been slapping, suddenly had their...
Had their leashes released, and with wanton abandon, they rampaged out in a berserk fashion and attacked old ladies, store owners, you name it.
And then they got to ship everybody to the FEMA Center.
That's right.
FEMA was helping during this learning process for everyone.
hillary clinton
We've seen 400 people arrested.
The facility at Sandpoint, we're told, is full.
unidentified
We're told they did not create another one at Boeing Field.
So why didn't the police department arrest the anarchists when they moved out of that building?
Well, that's a question a lot of people are asking, especially since the West Precinct is just down the block.
We asked the police department this weekend.
We asked them again today.
They still haven't returned our call with an answer.
It's a staged, managed operation.
These same anarchists have been used in Washington, D.C. to create a state of emergency.
For a day, they allow them to spray paint pig on police guards and attack officers.
And then the police are released once they're at fever pitch.
They are useful tools to neutralize the general population's ability to engage in political protest.
All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
This is the American Journal.
We will not be joined by Chase Geyser in studio this hour because he's having to...
He got pulled off to work on a new product launch.
Stay tuned for that.
And we are launching new products.
We have been launching new products pretty much on a continual basis since the creation of thealexjonesstore.com.
So if you haven't been there in a few days, you might want to check in.
And you might want to check in later this afternoon with the new...
Product launch that I know we're all very excited for.
But tons of great products, of course, at thealexjonesstore.com.
Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison.
Let them know who sent you.
Optimal Human is, of course, back in stock.
Stock up now because it does sell out quickly.
And you can get up to 50% off the Shilajit Complex, which, as you know, is a practically mythical product.
An Alex Jones fever dream.
It oozes from the top of the Himalaya and Altai Mountains.
It boosts your testosterone.
It helps with your cognitive capabilities.
It helps with your energy.
It just has a huge number of incredible effects.
It's been used for thousands of years.
And we make it extremely bioavailable.
And you do have to be careful because...
Shilajit, you know, if it's not done correctly, if it's not harvested correctly and processed correctly, lower quality Shilajit can have heavy metals.
So we were super careful with this, and I know I was watching it all behind the scenes, sourcing it from the best possible source, you know, processing it in the best, safest, you know, most clean and pure way.
Then also, even after all of that...
We sent our product, like we ordered the product just like a customer would, and then we sent it into the highest, best, most rigorous labs in the country to be tested and found absolutely everything was far, far, far below any amount that would make you worry.
In terms of heavy metals, things like that, that could appear in lower quality shilajit is not in ours.
We made absolutely certain.
We were very, very careful to make sure we were only getting the cleanest, purest, And most effective version of this miracle food.
So Shilajit took a lot of work behind the scenes to get this going.
Most people have never heard.
I'd never heard about it before, but since hearing about it and trying it myself, I encourage everybody to try Shilajit Complex on sale now at thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison.
So do we move on or do we...
Just try to finish out with the anti-Semitism stuff because let me just go through some of the stories that we have.
I guess I'll just go through some of it.
So you've got this Kingsley Wilson person who simply posts the acknowledged facts about the foundation of the ADL and the case of Leo Frank, murderer.
And this is responded to by the Times of Israel and Jewish Insider and all these other outlets with Things like Deputy Pentagon Press Secretary wrote anti-Semitic posts about Leo Frank.
Ridiculous, and again, this is the trick against Jewish people as well, where, you know, I always picture like, you know, we're sitting here like, this George Soros guy, George Soros is doing this, he's doing this,
he's destroying our justice, he's buying our prosecutors, he's doing all this stuff, and you have George Soros sitting there, and sitting next to him, Is like, you know, the, uh, is the pediatrician, the Jewish pediatrician that, you know, works in the office down the road.
And George Soros is going, like, nudging the pediatrician being like, you hearing this?
You hearing this?
This dude hates you.
This dude hates you and he wants to kill you and he wants you dead.
Jewish pediatrician's like, what?
He does?
Why?
What is this?
It's like, no, it's not true.
We're talking about George Soros being a scumbag.
We're talking about Leo Frank being a rapist and a murderer and the ADL being founded to cover that up.
But then these organizations, the Jews running this, turn to their average fellow Jew and go, hey, if they get to talk about us, you're next, buddy.
If they get to talk about the crimes we do, then they're going to be putting you in ovens in no time.
And it's like, that's crazy.
That's false.
It's false and it's self-perpetuating.
Because then they rope in all of the normal, not ADL Jews.
But anyway, it's a trick.
It's a lie.
It's a false dichotomy.
And you don't have to fall for it.
Anybody, anybody, nobody has to fall for it.
Then you have things like this.
McConnell's retirement.
Stokes concerns Massey may run for Senate.
Uh-oh.
Uh-oh.
The best congressman might run for Senate?
Oh my gosh.
Better do something about it.
Senator Mitch McConnell.
And if you remember, Thomas Massey won his seat despite the fact that AIPAC spent something like $100 million to try to defeat him.
And it's just like, well, that's not good.
Why is that happening?
Because he is America first.
And again, you know, Thomas Massey is sort of like the best example of like a dude who just...
I mean, to claim that Thomas Massey is like a Nazi, to claim that Thomas Massey hates Jews, it's like, really?
Okay, I mean, go with that, I guess.
You know, if that's your argument, go with that.
It's an absurd claim to make.
And it's stupid.
He's one of our best congressmen.
And yet, you've got the Republican-Jewish coalition pledging it would mount an aggressive push against Massey if he runs.
Okay, so it's not good for Republicans, not good for America, not good for Kentucky to have this happen.
So why are Jews doing this?
And is this really, like, Thomas Massey an existential threat to you?
And the thing is that, you know, in their construct of the world, he is, right?
In fact, just under the headline is this sub-headline, and this must be a link to a different story, right?
But it's also associated.
Colby says, nuclear Iran, an existential threat to the U.S. backpedaling on past views.
See if Thomas Massey gets Mitch McConnell's seat and becomes a force in the Senate.
Well, he's against endless, senseless warmongering and war profiteering on behalf of Israel.
Therefore, you know, he might stop the flow of money to Israel.
And if you stop the flow of money and help and assistance to Israel, then Iran might get a nuclear bomb.
And then they might nuke Israel and kill all the Jews.
Therefore, if Tommy Massey gets elected, all the Jews will die.
See how that works?
So now it's an existential...
Now it's like, throw $100 million at his...
Because he's an existential threat to the Jewish people.
That's the way the reasoning goes.
It's false.
It's stupid.
It's wrong.
It's counterproductive.
Does that make sense?
Does that make sense to everybody?
That makes sense to me.
I mean, you have to try to justify this because why else would a Republican committee try so desperately to skewer and destroy the career of one of the most beloved Congress?
That makes no sense.
And this is negative influence being carried out here.
United Democracy Project, the AIPAC-affiliated Super PAC, began laying the groundwork for an anti-Massey push in the 2024 election, running a series of statewide TV ads highlighting the congressman's anti-Israel voting record while saying it's not intended to get involved in his primary race, which was largely non-competitive.
Again, they spent like hundreds of millions of dollars.
He still got elected.
And the fact is, I think Kentucky has a Jewish population of about 0.4%, I think is the official number I heard.
And so it's like, okay, why should 0.4% of a population get veto power on who we get to elect and use endless funds of money to try to crush somebody who isn't even their enemy, but just like isn't their servant?
This is bad and wrong.
It's not hateful or anti-Semitic to say any of this.
I just want to keep emphasizing that.
Yesterday afternoon, Senate Republicans voted to repeal a new rule passed in December by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which prohibited payment apps like Venmo and PayPal from debanking users for political and ideological reasons.
Yes, you read that right.
Republicans voted in favor of more debanking.
As you know, the financial system has never been weaponized against conservatives, right?
And who's behind the biggest push for more debanking?
The ADL, of course.
These people deserve to lose so badly in 2026, it's not even funny.
In 2021, PayPal and the Anti-Defamation League announced a joint effort to fight extremism and hate, which the ADL routinely defines as criticism of Israel.
Debanking a consumer for criticism of Israel violates non-discrimination laws, but with the CFPB rule repealed, PayPal and the ADL would more easily be able to do so.
Okay?
Anti-First Amendment, anti-freedom, Predicated on fighting anti-Semitism.
But that's just an excuse to violate your rights.
And that's wrong.
And this shouldn't happen.
And yet the Republicans, the Free Speech Party, are the ones going along with this and allowing it.
The people who are debanked are the ones passing the law allowing for more debanking.
With the ADL who spends hundreds of millions of dollars trying to destroy the Republicans' greatest assets.
Strange bedfellows, right?
Very strange allies to have.
Justice Department to investigate University of California's system over allegations of anti-Semitism.
So Pam Bondi.
By the way, all of this, it's October 7th.
It was the genocide that opened a lot of people's eyes to Israel over the last year.
And then you've got a bunch of other stuff.
What's it called?
Sorry, totally just lost my train of thought.
That doesn't happen to me very often.
Oh, well, you have Jeffrey Epstein.
Sorry, I was going to talk because Pam Bondi.
It's been one week since Pam Bondi laid down the law, put her foot down, and said, you have those Jeffrey Epstein documents to me by 8 a.m.
The FBI said, nah.
Nah, we're not going to do that.
And it's been a week and nothing's happened and there's been no developments.
And she's like, they delivered truckloads of documents and they disappeared, I guess.
We haven't heard anything from that.
Now you've got Congressman Tim Burchette, I think his name is, said, you know, basically the Epstein documents have pretty much been destroyed.
They're lost.
They've been stolen.
And anything that is released, you probably shouldn't trust.
And of course, everybody knows Jeffrey Epstein, Jewish, worked for Israel, Robert Maxwell, we've been over all of it.
So, you know, all this is like compounding and sort of building on top of each other.
And if you aren't acknowledging this, speaking out against this, then, you know, you're contributing to the issue.
So, Pam Bondi, not doing so great on going after Epstein and his cohorts.
We haven't seen any Democrats.
They found billions of dollars of fraud, but no one's been arrested for that either.
So everybody's sitting there going, well, what the hell are you doing, Pam Bondi?
What are you doing if you're not doing all of these very obvious and easy things that we want you to do?
And the answer is because they're investigating colleges for allowing anti-Israel protests taking place.
This is the priority of our system right now.
And I've talked about this over and over again, and it's just like...
Really everything, really every part of this.
Our foreign policy is screwed up because of Israeli influence.
Our Justice Department is completely off the mark and doing things that it has absolutely no business doing because of the Jewish influence.
I mean, why this should never happen is this is insane.
In America, in 2025, the Justice Department is investigating speech on behalf of a foreign nation.
Okay, that's where we're at.
You can understand this.
Doesn't mean we hate Jews.
The Trump administration said Wednesday it would use a law typically meant to investigate racist practices within police departments to examine whether the University of California system had engaged in a pattern or practice of anti-Semitic discrimination.
The move by the Justice Department comes two days after the federal agencies announced a review of Columbia University's federal contracts to determine if such funding should be taken away over an alleged failure to protect Jewish students and faculty on campus.
President Trump has long rallied against American colleges and universities for their policies toward on-campus protests against the Israeli military actions in the Gaza Strip.
Some Jewish faculty and staff have complained that such protests, some of which featured anti-Semitic rhetoric, have made them feel harassed and that encampments impeded their ability to freely go from class to class.
Quote, the Department of Justice will always defend Jewish Americans, protect civil rights, and leverage our resources to eradicate institutional anti-Semitism, and our nation's universities, Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement.
Just, again, like, okay, so I guess the Justice Department has been hijacked and is now there to silence critics.
You think you're stopping anti-Semitism by doing this?
Or are you doing everything you possibly could to prove anti-Semites right and perpetuate the idea that our system has been hijacked by Jews for their own benefit?
I mean, come on.
Same time, I get it.
Call me whatever you want.
Maybe this is too nuanced for some people, but I have Jewish friends in San Francisco that are literally more conservative than any of my other friends.
Right now, they're battling it out in court because my friend had a rental property that a squatter moved into.
And now he's like, you know, there's all these groups that are, like, funding the squatter and, like, getting a legal representation.
He's, like, fighting.
And it's like, he could at any point have just, like, you know, backed out and would have been okay if he's like, it's the principle of the matter.
I will not back down.
It's my house.
I'm getting it back.
So anyway, it's, you know, true American dude.
And he's walking down the street in San Francisco and doesn't realize there's a Palestinian protest.
And people start threatening him and putting their finger in his face.
He has to run away because they're mobbing him.
He has nothing to do with it.
He's not an Israeli.
He's an American.
So, you know, I got sympathy for Jews that show up on campus and get insults or threats yelled at him.
It's got to be a tough position to be in.
But then, at the same time, it's like, wow, pretty strident statement there, Pam Bondi.
Is focused on eradicating institutional anti-Semitism.
And it's like, you realize that these schools spent the last 10 years with entire courses called things like eradicating whiteness.
Like, these schools, half of their curriculum is explicitly calling white people evil and agitating against them.
And so it's like, alright.
If the government's just going hands-off and these people are crazy and they're anti-white, but the government says, hey, it's free speech, what are we going to do?
Fine, fine.
But it's got to be across the board.
But they're willing to make statements like this against anti-Semitism while allowing the anti-whitism to fester and expand and grow and cause all sorts of massive discomfort for the white kids to go to those schools and open, blatant discrimination against them.
And it's like, okay.
We're not supposed to notice this.
We're not supposed to ask why that is.
We're not supposed to be upset at this or concerned about the obvious inequality here.
So this is bad.
This is wrong.
It's a curtailment of the First Amendment.
It is a violation of the separation of church and state.
It is a ridiculous waste of Department of Justice dollars.
And it's...
If nothing else, feeding in directly to the rise in anti-Semitism because it's proof of all the claims the anti-Semites make.
So what are you doing?
So what are you doing exactly?
Hamas says Trump threats encourage Netanyahu to evade Gaza's ceasefire deal because of course, because of course, you know, Donald Trump's like, if they don't hand over all of the people, then we're going to go to war with Gaza.
And it's just like...
We didn't vote for this.
Nobody voted for this.
We didn't vote for it.
And ironically, can you imagine, can you even fathom the blowout victory this election would have been if Trump had been like hardcore in favor of peace in the Middle East?
Do you have any idea how many single issue voters there are in the Democratic Party that would have voted for Trump?
They would have held their nose and voted for Trump if they thought Trump is going to stop the genocide.
But he didn't do that, and the elite Jews who meddle in politics decided that it would be better to back Trump since he's the pro-Israel, pro-Jewish side of the conflict at this point.
And so that's how that works.
Donald Trump threatens Palestinians in Gaza with death in stunning social media posts.
Thanks, Trump.
Very American of you.
Ridiculous.
And it really does just go on and on.
And, of course, there's the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act that passed.
Now there's like an anti-Semitism hall monitor in every department of the government.
They're adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Foundations or Associations definition of anti-Semitism that conflates criticism of Israel or...
Any Jew or group of Jews or crimes, real or fake.
It just basically says, keep your mouth shut or it's illegal.
Or you're doing the Holocaust again.
You have to shut up about the nation state of Israel, the foreign, sovereign, secular state of Israel, or else you're an anti-Semite and the American government will come after you.
Okay.
Let's call this out.
Let's not allow this.
And let's not let...
Your emotions or your inclinations or your systemic brainwashing have you supporting this or going insane about it and fulfilling all of the things that they want you to fulfill.
What I'm interested in not letting is I don't want the ADL Training every FBI agent that white people are the only threat they need to worry about.
I don't like that, and I want that to end.
So in my mind, I say, what do we need to do to get that to end?
And if you think the ADL is training every FBI agent, and they're censoring people, and they're behind a lot of the push for censorship online, and they are passing laws to criminalize speech, they're doing all these bad things, I know...
I'm going to go find a Jew and call him a demon to his face.
It's like, well done, the ADL backed down.
No, you did it.
That was it.
Great strategy.
Well done.
It's just so stupid.
It's all so stupid.
I don't want the ADL censoring me.
Nobody should.
Jew, Gentile, doesn't matter.
You shouldn't allow this private, religious, extremist organization to have such an influence in your government.
So what is the strategy to stop that?
My strategy would be, call it out, point out, did you know the ADL trains every new FBI agent in their role as protectors of the American people and the Constitution?
Well, do you know that the ADL is probably the number one threat to the Constitution at this point?
So what are they doing training the FBI on threats to the Constitution while simultaneously passing laws that eviscerate the First Amendment?
Doesn't make any sense.
This is stupid.
So to me, I don't know, that's my position.
It's just like...
Replace Jews with Catholic, nothing I say changes, right?
It was a Catholic organization that was passing laws and you had the Justice Department going, we are investigating anti-Catholic activity at these schools.
Catholic students are, they don't feel comfortable when you have all of these Muslims in there and we're going to deport all the Muslims.
Like, you had to be against that too.
It doesn't mean, you know.
People are saying something about my Jeffrey Epstein post being anti-Semitic.
It's like, hey, I wouldn't have called them Jews if they weren't, all right?
I would not have mentioned the Jews if they weren't Jewish, okay?
I wouldn't have mentioned that they are Jewish if they themselves don't make it a central pillar of their identity and the justification for why they do things that they're doing.
I don't see why any of this is complicated.
It's all so stupid and extreme.
We just not destroy the First Amendment.
Thanks, guys.
Thank you.
Alright, welcome back, folks.
We're gonna...
We gotta move on.
We gotta move on.
But I think I might be going insane.
Am I going insane?
Am I not being clear?
Like, I'm starting to get mad.
I think I'm very clear.
I think I'm very straightforward and clear with the way I say things.
And then it's just like, I read comments and I'm just like, alright, one of us is insane.
One of us is insane.
Either like, you know it's like that scene from King of the Hill when it goes into Boomhauer's memory.
And Boomhauer.
And then he goes back to his memory and he's like, I do believe that we may have left something upon the fire truck, my good friends.
Like, is that what's happening to me?
That, like, I talk and I think I'm being very clear and upfront, and then, like, if I were to go back and watch this episode, I'm just, like, drooling and ranting and raving and nothing I'm saying makes sense.
Like, is something happening?
Is there a disconnect here?
I don't understand.
I feel like I'm going insane.
I feel like I'm being perfectly clear with everything that I'm saying.
Is it hard to understand?
Am I not being clear enough?
I don't get it, okay?
I don't get it.
I've spent the last hour or so dealing with what is the biggest topic by far in the discussion worldwide right now.
In the political realm.
Which is the fact that you've got Ian Carroll going on Joe Rogan, Candace Owens going on Theo Vaughn.
Both of these people, while not anti-Semitic, while not focused on the Jews, are simply honest and straightforward and upfront about the influence of Israel and AIPAC and the ADL and Jeffrey Epstein and Mossad and the CIA and the FBI. And, you know, you treat these things.
Like you treat all the other things and this has become a giant topic of conversation.
I feel like I have some responsibility in this as well as just some personal reason to do this because like I said, it's like the ADL, APAC, these are the organizations that are fundamental in destroying our rights.
It's what they're doing right now.
They're attacking our rights as we speak and I'm trying to defend our rights.
I have a reason to talk about this as well, and a reason to try to tamp down on the rhetoric that makes it more difficult to defeat these organizations.
That if they can justifiably tell people that the ADL is not bad, these people that hate the ADL, they're just anti-Semites.
And then you go on X and end up by like, yeah, we are, we hate Jews and we hate the ADL. I was like, okay, so you think normal, reasonable, good people, like normal people that you see on the street, like the vast majority of Americans, they're not hateful people, and they have a genuine negative reaction to that stuff.
So like, you're driving them away.
You're driving them into the hands of the ADL. So like, what are you doing?
What are you doing?
unidentified
Okay.
harrison smith
Is that not clear?
Is anybody confused at what I just said?
I've just spent the last hour talking about this because it is the number one topic and I hope I can be a mitigating or nuanced or at the very least honest and upfront voice about this.
And then I get a comment three minutes ago from Stephen G. Lander says, after 24 years of watching Infowars on a daily basis, I can no longer watch Harrison Smith or Owen Schroyer any longer.
Due to their Israel derangement syndrome, I can only watch Real Alex Jones and Real Chase Geyser.
It's unfortunate, as I used to like watching them.
Am I not being clear?
Am I like, what are you talking about?
My overwhelming Israeli...
Again, I'm actually questioning myself.
I'm like, am I talking about this too much?
Am I obsessed with this?
So I went back into the show logs of the last week.
And it's like, I guess yesterday I mentioned Candace Owens on Theo Vaughn, and I played a video about her talking about AIPAC. AIPAC's the only—it's an organization that provides the ability for Israel to be the only country allowed to spend infinite amounts of money to influence our electoral system.
That's wrong.
It's bad.
Not because they're Jewish, but because they're foreign.
That's not complicated.
I played that video yesterday at the beginning of the show.
I don't think I've mentioned Israel for the last week.
I've talked about Epstein.
And his relations to Israel.
Again, derangement syndrome or a fact, a major political topic, the giant overwhelming, you know, topic of conversation for the last week.
All right.
It's fine.
Talked about the space station coming down.
I talked about, you know, Biden, Elon Musk and Ukraine.
Talked a lot about Ukraine.
Hardly, hardly mentioned.
The massive Jewish influence there.
You think it's a surprise?
You think it's a coincidence that Victoria Nuland, Anthony Blinken, all the people behind the Ukraine war are all Ukrainian?
Ukrainian Jews driven out of Ukraine during pogroms in the Second World War?
I didn't even mention that.
I didn't even talk about this.
So, again, we talked about the German government funding NGOs full of Antifa to attack people.
We did that awesome interview with Invisible Inquiry talking about USAID and the creation of COVID. We talked about what else?
The black population.
We talked about intelligence sharing with Ukraine.
Talked a lot about Ukraine.
Talked a lot about the address, the State of the Union.
Spent a lot of that.
Talked about the Podesta slush fund, USAID. A lot of funding to go out to Podesta.
I went through the last week of shows on our show notes.
Pretty much never mentioned Israel.
So, I don't know what to say, except that, like, if your intention is trolling and making me hate you, then you're doing a good job.
You're doing a good job.
And it's just like, it's like kind of the perfect real-life, in-real-time example of the problem here.
Hardly, like...
Hardly ever talk about Israel.
Israel is a much bigger topic just on X in general than it ever is on my show.
It's not my focus.
It's not something I ever bring up or focus on unless it is a component of a major news story.
And then you got people going, you have Israel derangement syndrome.
It's all you ever talk about.
And now it's made your show unwatchable.
It's like, all right, well.
Then one of us is crazy, dude.
Then one of us is insane because because it's you.
unidentified
It's you.
harrison smith
You're the insane one, actually.
So anyway, I thought that was kind of perfect.
Kind of perfect, actually.
Kind of the perfect pose to illustrate the reason why I'm talking about any of this stuff and all of this stuff because of this weird warp that happens when you talk about Israel.
It is crazy.
It really is crazy.
unidentified
Okay.
harrison smith
So, I don't know.
I guess I'll have to take your calls.
unidentified
Maybe...
harrison smith
Maybe I'm Boomhauer.
We'll move on now.
In a second.
In a second.
Because, again, you've got all these people that are really very big on the right wing, right?
Joel whatever.
Joel Berry.
President, managing editor of the Babylon Bee.
Major, you know, right-wing conservative comedy outlet saying Jew hate is the new wokeness.
Basically saying Ian Carroll on Joe Rogan is another Shoah.
Jeremy Boring, yesterday was a terrible day for American Jews.
Embraced by so many prominent voices of demented, conspiratorial, anti-Jewish voices.
It's one of the saddest, most alarming events in my lifetime.
This way lies madness.
And worse than madness, do not let the times cost you your soul.
All right, well, Israel's bombing children and I'm against that, so I don't know what else to tell you, dude.
I don't know what else to tell you.
I like the First Amendment, so cry about it.
Joel Webin says, you know, he quotes Jeremy Boring saying, yesterday was a terrible day.
Really?
What happened?
A terrorist attack?
A natural disaster?
No, worse, a podcast.
A podcast that simply said what everyone already knows.
Epstein Files won't ever truly be revealed because it would indict Israel.
Everybody knows that, dude.
Everybody knows it, but talking about it is a catastrophe, apparently.
Clint Russell, Liberty Lockpod.
Again, somebody nobody could ever...
A dude whose ideology is basically dictated by a series of libertarian Jews like Milton Friedman and Ayn Rand, who are great, by the way.
Not an insult.
I like him too.
But it's just funny when you have people that...
It's like, okay.
Just clearly, not even remotely anti-Semitic.
But this type of thing that normal people are understanding and believing now.
He's responding to Secretary Marco Rubio because, again, I'm very sorry for noticing this.
This is a flare-up of my Israel derangement syndrome that I happen to notice things like...
Every single secretary of Trump seems to be focused more than anything else on fighting anti-Semitism.
Those who support designated terrorist organizations, including Hamas, threatens our national security.
The United States has zero tolerance for foreign visitors who support terrorists.
Violators of the U.S. law, including international students, face visa denial or revocation.
And basically, long story short, if you don't support Israel, they'll deport you.
And that's retarded and stupid and not American.
So Clint Russell responds.
Creating special laws to defend a foreign country from protest is un-American garbage, and I won't pretend it's not.
Creating hate speech laws for that same country is un-American garbage, and I won't pretend it's not.
Crap like this creates anti-Semitism.
Stop doing it.
Yeah, again, everybody's thinking this.
Glenn Greenwald, Jewish individual, says these people are criminalizing protests against Israel on college U.S. campuses with prison and deportation.
But now they see Candace Owens with a far larger audience than they, Theo Vaughn questioning Israel, an Ian Carroll show on Rogan.
The more you censor, the more people ask why.
This is just one of those litmus tests where it's like, yeah, normal, reasonable, honest people just see what's going on and are sick of it.
You know, a bunch of people saying, actually, you hate Jews, and it's just not helpful for anybody.
Dan Holloway.
Holloway.
No reasonable person thinks all Jewish people everywhere are engaged in some global conspiracy, but many reasonable people believe the state of Israel ran a pedophile blackmail ring to control our politicians with help from our own intelligence community because one ringleader's dad was Mossad and the other made time with the former Israeli PM. There's nothing anti-Semitic about that, and saying so makes you look like an ass.
We've been opening cans of worms lately, showing coups and conspiracies in our own country going back 60 years, and your position as Israel, despite the facts, is immune from crappy leadership?
That's goofy nonsense.
Whatever.
I'd say that's sort of my final note is the reason it's so frustrating and incomprehensible to me is because when you call out Christians doing bad things, I'm right there with you.
When you call out America doing evil things overseas, abroad, wherever, like, I cannot even fathom the idea of being like, I am under attack.
Okay, so...
You can point to me and go, look, Israeli or American commandos rolled into this city and killed a bunch of kids.
And my response is not, oh my God, you're anti-American.
We need laws against your speech.
It's to say that's terrible.
That doesn't represent me.
That is anathema to my ideology.
That's a violation of my country.
And America, like, we need to pay for that.
And the people who did that need to be ousted because that's not us.
That's why I don't understand or have sympathy for people who will cover up crimes of Israel or cover up crimes of Jewish people or organizations because they're Jewish.
That just doesn't track with me.
That doesn't make any sense to me.
Same time, I get it.
Same time, I understand it, as we were talking about earlier.
And I don't want to just get back into it and redoing this over and over.
I will move on.
And I was going to move on until I got that message about my Israeli derangement syndrome, which ironically then seems to have somehow.
Kickstarted the Israeli derangement syndrome.
So there it is.
So there it is, I guess.
But again, that's why I really don't understand it, and that is the main takeaway, is it's like, you don't have to support these people.
You don't have to support these organizations.
They don't have your best interests in mind.
If they don't represent you and you don't agree with what they're doing, then don't defend them just because they're Jews.
That's stupid.
And I guess that's it at the end of the day.
It's just, you know.
You don't condemn or defend anybody for their immutable characteristics.
You do it because of their actions.
And that gets all confused.
So I'm sick of talking about it.
We're done.
We're done talking about it.
We're moving on.
We've got a bunch of ridiculous nonsense to get into that I'm also sick of talking about.
So let's do that instead.
Act Blue.
This one's crazy.
ActBlue, the Democratic fundraising powerhouse, faces internal chaos.
ActBlue, the online fundraising organization that powers Democratic candidates, has plunged into turmoil with at least seven senior officials resigning late last month and a remaining lawyer suggesting he faced internal retaliation.
Excuse me.
The departures from ActBlue, which helps raise money for Democrats running for office at all levels of government.
Comes as the group is under investigation by congressional Republicans.
They have advanced legislation that some Democrats warn could be used to debilitate what is the party's leading fundraising operation.
And frankly, it would.
It would debilitate it because the Democrats' number one top fundraising organization is in fact a giant money laundering criminal enterprise.
So...
They're in a pickle.
So they're in a bit of a pickle, I think.
And that is what's happening.
You get that's what's happening, that we figured out, independent investigators like James O'Keefe figured out that ActBlue was claiming that individuals were giving hundreds of thousands of dollars in individual donations, went and asked those actual people in person on camera, did you give this money?
And they said no, meaning that ActBlue is simply laundering the money.
Meaning that we don't know where it's coming from.
Meaning that the Democrat, number one funding apparatus, is a giant criminal scam.
Allowing total violation of campaign finance laws and eviscerating fairness when it comes to our elections.
And so now, the rats are fleeing the sinking ship.
These people are trying to get out before the hammer comes down.
And the true scale of the criminality is revealed.
I hope it doesn't work.
I really hope it doesn't work.
That's not the way this works, right?
You can't, you know, you can't, if you're doing a RICO case, the person can't just be like, oh no, I quit the Crips yesterday.
Oh no, actually, I dropped out of La Cosa Notra last month.
I'm not a part of that organization anymore.
It's like, well, you still did crimes as part of a criminal enterprise, so I'm glad you retired from it, but you still have to be held to account for it.
So I hope justice awaits these scum.
The exodus has set off deep concerns about ActBlue's future.
Last week, two unions representing the group's workers sent a blistering letter to ActBlue's board of directors that listed the seven officials who had left.
The letter described an alarming pattern of departures that was eroding our confidence in the stability of the organization.
What prompted so many longtime ActBlue officials to leave is not clear.
None of the former officials agreed to be interviewed on the record.
Like many organizations, as we undergo some transition heading into a new election cycle, we're focused on ensuring we have a strong team in place, said Megan Hughes, an ActBlue spokeswoman.
Greatly appreciate the contribution of our incredible team members and remain deeply committed to the success of our organization and our mission to enable grassroots supporters to make their voices heard.
Now my primary mission is rest, said Elisa Tuomi, Back to Blue's departing vice president for customer service.
Yeah, I mean...
I don't know if you thought we were exaggerating when we said the Democrat Party is genuinely collapsing and just disintegrating in front of us, but no, it actually is.
It actually genuinely, their funding mechanisms, their organizations, the individuals, their talking points, it's all just falling to dust before our very eyes.
I know Rob Dew posted this, and I think he may have pointed out something funny in it, which is why I'm trying to...
No, I just said the rats are sinking their money laundering ship.
So yeah, they got caught and now they're getting out.
In recent weeks, congressional Republicans have demanded answers from ActBlue about security and fraud prevention measures, as well as how the group prevents certain foreign donors from illegally contributing to candidates.
The letter from ActBlue Unions worked, warns that the group was, quote, under increasing scrutiny and the target of bad faith political attacks at the hands of ill-intentioned operators.
Okay, but it's true though, right?
But the accusations being made are accurate and do have evidence to back them up.
So it's not actually bad faith, is it?
It's not actually ill-intentioned, is it, though?
That's all they have, basically, is questioning your motive when you catch them in crimes.
Meanwhile, where's the...
I got more stuff about the absolute collapse of the Democrats.
One thing you can see in the collapse of the Democrats is the way in which they're kind of not keeping a lid on their more stupid politicians anymore.
They're usually very good at sort of like controlling this sort of stuff.
But this woman has come onto the scene and I've even talked about her very much and I don't like talking about her very much because She clearly is just being outrageous and offensive on purpose to get attention, and she doesn't want to give her this attention.
At the same time, she is like a symbol and an icon and an avatar for the total and deliberate degradation of the country.
This is from 2024. U.S. Representative from Texas, Jasmine Crockett, unfit for office.
And talks about some of the more outrageous statements she made in 2024, where she, I mean, it's just, she's very, very offensive and stupid.
Offensive and stupid, I think.
She talks about Donald Trump is like, literally calls him evil orange man, your orange savior.
And it's just horrible.
And she's sort of destroying her own party.
I think this is about it.
Let's go to clip number four here.
This is Scott Jennings on CNN. My hero.
My hero is Scott Jennings on CNN talking about these weird TikTok videos that Jasmine Crockett and others are doing where they basically just act like ghetto hood rats and completely diminish the The gravity.
Remember, these are the Democrats who, when January 6th happened, were like, they refused to uphold the sacredness and the glory, the righteousness of this house of democracy.
And then you look at who the representatives they are, they're sending to this temple of democracy.
It's people like Jasmine Crockett and their participation in this government is an insult to all of us.
Let's go to Scott Jennings on CNN. If you do something creative, you're going to get criticism, right?
unidentified
But I actually applaud them for trying to do something different.
And here's the reality.
Seven million followers, whether you think it's cringe or you like it, we're on CNN on a Thursday night, and we're talking about it on national TV. But I guess my question is, to what end?
I don't get it.
Like, I don't get it.
abby phillip
I mean, maybe you will get seven million eyeballs.
unidentified
What is the point?
scott jennings
I am not accustomed to helping your party do anything.
unidentified
Yeah.
scott jennings
But let me give you some advice.
This was the dumbest thing I've ever seen.
And if you read the comments today, Lord have mercy.
Look.
Scrambling for new social media and communication strategies is not a replacement for fixing what's actually wrong.
Your party has a 21% approval rating right now.
Congressional Democrats...
unidentified
But let's talk about fixing what's wrong.
Donald Trump is doing nothing for the American people.
scott jennings
And he has a 50% approval rating.
unidentified
But he's doing nothing for the American people.
scott jennings
And so my advice, my strong advice would be fix the policy and leave the gimmicks behind.
unidentified
Yes, and let's make policy.
harrison smith
Yeah, that was brilliant from Scott Jennings, and he's exactly right.
you And we'll continue this on the other side, because I've got some more videos to go to, because I'll tell you all about Jasmine Crockett.
Because, you know, part of the most outrageous, you know, things about her is she's a race baiter, she's unqualified, she's incompetent, she's not very intelligent at all.
She's very unfortunate.
But she also was just a complete and total fraud.
So, like, she literally puts on a, like, ratchet girl, like, hood rat accent and acts like a stereotype.
And then you actually look into who she is and where she was educated, how she grew up, and it's all an act.
It's all a total flagrant act.
Which I would think would be a little bit insulting.
That you've got somebody who speaks, you know, with perfect diction, went to private schools her whole life, grew up incredibly privileged and well-off, then, like, puts on, like, low-class black culture as, as like a costume to try to trick them into voting for her.
I'd be kind of insulted at that.
So I'm going to tell you all about Jasmine Crockett on the other side.
I'm going to tell you all about where she came from, who she is, what a giant fraud she is, and then we'll stop talking about her because that's all she wants at the end of the day.
I should talk about her.
We won't give her that.
We won't give her that satisfaction.
We'll be right back.
unidentified
We'll see you later.
Jasmine Crockett.
harrison smith
Jasmine Crockett is a new star in the Democratic Party.
She's a rising star in the Democratic Party.
Jasmine Felicia Crockett.
She's making big waves.
She's making a big splash.
Basically from the sheer fact that people see videos of her and they're shocked to learn that this person is a congresswoman.
That's really the sort of overwhelming feeling.
And she just says, Let's go to clip number 14. Here's Representative Jasmine Crockett just spewing in a ridiculous, absurd, outrageous lie that's also very deliberate blood libel against white people.
Here's Jasmine Crockett, professional race baiter.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Let me make sure y'all got the facts.
Most extreme crimes that take place in this country are committed by white supremacists.
80% of extreme crimes are committed by white supremacists in this country.
Do you know who went up there on January 6th?
White supremacists.
This ain't me just telling you this.
harrison smith
I'm sorry, ma'am.
That's literally what this is.
No, that is just you telling us that.
Because that is...
It came from your mouth.
It exists nowhere else.
It's not even remotely, tangentially related to reality.
It's not just me telling you this.
No, it is.
It is.
It is a...
I'm speechless.
So, 80%...
Of extreme crimes?
Does she mean extremist?
Does she mean like a category of like domestic extremism?
And is she going off the definition of domestic extremism that like the ADL gives us?
Where it's like you know you'll have a black guy being like I just wanted to murder white people and he just like runs over four white people and they're just like ooh well you get probation and mental health care and then a white guy Like, I don't know, hangs up a poster that says, I like being white.
And there's like another extremist crime on the books.
Another white supremacist extremist crime.
Tally it up.
Added to the tally.
Oh my god, they're out of control.
But she didn't say that.
She said extreme crimes.
She said 80% of extreme crimes in America are the fault of white supremacists.
It's so insane, I don't even know how to confront it.
Here's her real voice.
Let's go to clip number three.
This is her before she was famous.
unidentified
No one could have told me that when I went down to Austin, now it looks like a little bit over a year ago, that I would be running for Congress.
It's just not what my plan was.
But what I've always decided is that I would step up.
harrison smith
She sounds normal.
unidentified
Listen, he up there, he's feeling all kinds of nonsense and bullshit.
Let me just be real.
We ain't gonna sit for that shit.
harrison smith
We ain't gonna sit for that.
We ain't gonna sit for that, y'all.
It's called code switching.
They call that code switching.
I really was kind of caught off guard.
Now, but here's the thing.
All right, let's pull it down.
That's called code switching.
All right.
Now, you could say, well...
This is just sort of, it's a culturally black thing that, like, and it's not even really a black thing.
It's like a white thing, too, where, like, when I'm with my friend, we sound ghetto, too.
Like, it's one of those things where it's like, well, maybe that's the way she really talks.
She really talks like a stereotype, like a bad cartoon from the 40s.
We ain't going to stand for that, baby girl.
Like, maybe that's the way she really talks, but then when she's in, like, a white professional setting, she's like, all right, I better talk like a white person now.
That could be the case.
I'll grant you that.
It's not, though, because when you look into Jasmine Crockett, you realize she is one of the most privileged people you would have ever met.
And every school she went to for her entire life costs an average of $50,000 a year to attend elementary through high school.
She's a privileged woman.
She talks like a privileged woman.
Unless she's pretending to get votes.
All right, welcome back, folks.
So Jasmine Crockett, Jasmine Felicia Crockett.
Puts on this act, being a hood rat, being a ratchet-type girl.
It's completely fraudulent.
It's completely fraudulent.
Born in 1981 in St. Louis, Missouri, growing up in the city, she attended Mary Institute, St. Louis County Day School, and Rosati Kane, an all-girls Catholic school in St. Louis.
Each one of these has a...
It's a private school with a tuition around $50,000 a year.
Educated at far, far more prestigious institutions than yours truly, certainly.
Public school boy over here.
Crockett later attended Rhodes College, a private liberal arts school in Memphis, Tennessee.
While there, get a load of this sentence, she and several other black Rhodes students were victims of a hate crime which led her to pursue a career in social justice.
The little nick in this, the little crack in this facade, there's no proof of a hate crime ever happening.
It's never been proven.
There's been no evidence.
This is now part of her official biography, her story.
She was just an innocent private school Catholic girl until she was the victim of a vicious hate crime.
So you look this up, you're like, what was the hate crime?
And it's like, most articles can't even tell you.
Like, it just, they don't even say, there's like, it was a hate crime.
It's like, well, what happened?
And they're like, hate crime.
But somebody hurt, were there threats?
And what came out is like, let me see if I can actually find it.
It basically, nothing happened.
And she's like, we received letters.
She alleges she and other black students were victims of multiple hate crimes, though crimes included racist slurs and hate mail that were put in her and 17 other students' campus mailboxes using letters cut from newspapers and magazines, as well as vandalism of vehicles.
That's what we in the business call a hoax.
That's what we in the information business call a lie.
A lie and a hoax and something that never happened.
I'm just gonna, I'm very confident saying, yeah, there's never, because guess what?
I know a lot of racists on X. I've never met a single one in my entire life that would go through the effort of cutting out letters from a magazine, getting a stick of glue, getting a stick of Elmer's glue, and doing a craft project, and then licking an envelope Putting on a postage stamp.
Finding out the address of black students just to send hostage letter hate mail magazine collages to random black college students.
You get that that's absurd, right?
You get that that's the type of hoax that a very dumb person comes up with and thinks is legitimate and prays to God that nobody actually investigates because there's no evidence of it.
And if there was, it would show it came from them.
It would show the calls coming from inside the house.
Yeah, that never happened.
I'm just...
Plus, especially, especially when she says that's the beginning of her social justice career.
Because the only way that would make any remote sense at all is if she was like a hardcore, like, anti-white activist.
Who, like, would draw ire from people.
Then, like, maybe she would become a target.
But, like, she's saying that she was totally, like, oblivious to social justice.
She wasn't involved in any racial stuff until she randomly received letters with cutout magazine words.
That was a hate crime.
That was racist.
And these were mailed to her through the U.S. Postal Service.
Like, okay.
Okay.
unidentified
Okay.
harrison smith
Tom Papert, writing for the Tennessee Star just two months ago, has tried valiantly to get to the bottom of this story, but has been unsuccessful in finding any corroborating evidence.
He contacted Crockett's spokesperson at Rhodes College and the Cochran law firm that Crockett alleges Rhodes hired to deal with the hate crimes.
Four years ago, not even Crockett could identify the name of the female attorney who she describes as her shero in an interview.
And it's weird.
Nobody knows nothing about nothing.
So she comes out and is like, my personal story began when I received racist hate mail from Rhodes College.
And it was a big deal.
We had to get a law firm.
And then Tom Papert contacts Rhodes College.
They're like, we never heard about an incident.
Contacts the law firm.
They're like, we never had anything to do with that.
Contacts the spokesperson.
They're like, wow, there's...
What do you mean evidence?
Are you a racist?
You're asking for evidence for a hate crime?
You must be a Nazi.
She's just a total fraud.
She's just a total abject fraud.
Private school, educated rich girl, fakes a hate crime against herself, puts on a ghetto accident, and becomes star of Congress.
Tales old this time.
The American dream.
The Democrat Party in a nutshell.
Endless lies, folks.
If you can...
You know, maybe this is a good time to go to this video.
This is from Kissin' something.
I always forget this guy's name.
Clip number eight.
Really, I mean, when I first saw this video, it never left my mind.
I think about this video all the time.
It's very brilliant.
Kissin'.
What's the guy's name?
K-I-S-I-N. I can't remember if that's his first name or last name, but that's this guy's name.
Clip number eight, here's him talking about the danger and the impact of victimhood on a person's psyche, and I think this applies perfectly to both the black community, for whom Jasmine Crockett and others are happy to weaponize their victimization mentality in order to gain votes and power and justify her racial hatred, as well as, I would say, the Jewish community.
Who is kept in a state of control by being told constantly they are either victims or imminent victims of racial hatred from everybody who's not them in a way enforcing their in-group mentality and deliberately destroying their ability to remove themselves from the influence of people who again want to take advantage of and exploit.
This imposed victim mentality.
So this really is a poison in our society.
And I think this study that Kissin is talking about has very interesting insight into it.
Let's watch.
konstantin kisin
They did an experiment with a group of women, and they put scars on their faces, and they told these women that they're going into a job interview, and the purpose of the experiment is to find out whether people with facial disfigurements face discrimination.
They showed them the scars in the mirror, the women saw themselves with the scars, and as they led them out of the room, they said, we're just going to touch it up a little bit.
And as they touched it up, they removed the scar incompletely.
So the women went into the job interview thinking that they are scarred, but actually being their normal selves.
And the result of the experiment is that those women then came back reporting massively increased level of discrimination.
Indeed, many of them came back with comments that the interviewer had made that they felt were referencing their facial disfigurements.
And this is why I think this ideology of victimhood is so dangerous, because if you preach to people constantly that we're all oppressed, then that primes people to look for them.
harrison smith
Of course, we know this, right?
The whole victimhood mentality thing.
This is something that was sort of adjudicated in public all the way back in 2016. The victimhood complex.
Everybody sort of gets this now.
But I don't think people realize how...
How thoroughly it can affect your worldview.
Teaching people that they're victims makes them victims.
Stop it.
And so, of course, you can extrapolate that very, very easily with race.
Especially when you're told that the racism is unconscious bias.
You know, quiet, secretive, not overt.
Bias, bias, even that the person who's being biased might not even consciously recognize.
So now they're training people to see victimhood in absolutely everything.
So I think that's brilliant.
So these women who think they have a scar on their face come out of the interview going, yeah, he made these comments about my scar.
I thought it was very rude.
Like, you don't even have a scar.
To race, and when black people are told you're constantly being discriminated against, you're hated, nobody's hiring you because you're black, like, how easy is it to then believe that and to constantly be reading into everything some sort of racial connotation that doesn't exist in the first place, but then becomes a, you know, self-perpetuating sort of thing.
Because then you have people faking hate crimes against themselves like Jasmine Crockett and making it harder for any of us to know what the hell is going on.
Again, I think that's brilliant and is sort of at the heart of most racial grievances in this country.
I think it goes right to the heart of it.
Now I'm going to go to this video, clip number two.
This is absolutely brutal but not unexpected.
And I think we're going to see this to an increasing degree if we don't...
Identify and put a stop to it now.
And that is the way in which the powers that be, especially the Green New Deal pushers, are really being very aggressive and blatant in their misuse of governmental powers to force people into behaviors that they're incapable of convincing them into.
Because they always first try to convince you.
They first try to get you to do it willingly.
But when you won't, they have to force you.
And if forcing you is sort of off the table because we have laws against it and just social mores against it, then they are still going to force you, but they're going to cloak it with an excuse about something else.
You'll see what I mean when we watch this video.
Clip number two.
Ranchers in Utah kicked off their land to protect an endangered species, only to have that land immediately developed by a housing company.
Let's watch.
unidentified
30 years ago, ranchers were kicked off their land here to protect an endangered species.
But now, that same land is being bulldozed for a massive housing development that could double the population of the small town of Leeds.
So residents here are wondering, was this land really protected or just reserved for the right price?
Back in the 90s, the government rescinded ranchers' permits here in Leeds, saying they had to stop grazing cattle because it was a threat to the endangered desert tortoise habitat.
Pam Johnson's family lost their permit, which they paid nearly $50,000 for and was supposed to last for 99 years.
They also had to sell their cattle to then pay for that permit.
But today, bulldozers are ripping through that same protected land to make way for homes, hotels, and retail stores.
Pam is furious.
She told me that that land should never have been bulldozed, and if it was protected, it should have stayed protected.
So the question is, what has changed?
Town officials told me that once this land was sold to a private developer, the developer has a legal right to build.
The mayor said that the town needs this tax revenue and that that revenue will help with some necessary infrastructure improvements.
For Johnson and other residents here in Leeds, the contradiction is glaring, and they fear that with the zoning changes already passed in August that it's too late for this land and the tortoises that live here to be saved.
harrison smith
What a scam.
What a scam that one is.
You can't graze your cattle here.
We have to protect the desert tortoise.
As soon as they get the deeds, they sell it to build homes and track houses.
Yeah, it's a scam, right?
Like I was just saying.
First, you want to try to get people to do it willingly.
Hey, you want to sell us your ranch?
We could build a bunch of homes here.
Oh, they're not willing to.
Darn it.
All right.
Well, now we have to force them.
Well, you can't just go, hey, we want this land.
Let's force them off.
Let's steal the land.
Hey, we want to steal this land.
Can we force the cattle off?
You can't do that.
You have to have an excuse.
So they look around.
They find the desert tortoise.
They go, that's a good excuse.
We'll say this is about environmentalism.
It doesn't matter.
They're trying to get the people off the land.
Once they get them off the land, the excuse is no longer useful.
They toss to the side and just do what they were going to do anyway.
It's insane.
It's insane they do.
And, you know, part of what she said, I don't think people understand how so many of the sort of leftist policies, I don't even know how to put this.
They're predicated on environmentalism or humanitarianism, and we know that that's hypocritical and nonsensical.
Why these municipalities or governments would allow it to take place?
And it's pretty simple.
Let's say you have a neighborhood.
It's an old neighborhood.
It's got a bunch of nice old wooden homes built in like the early 1900s.
Big lots, big trees, single family homes.
Now I see that and I think it's lovely.
I think it's beautiful.
To the left...
That's a waste of resources because you could tear down that home from the 1920s.
You could build condominiums and you could have 10 families on that same plot of land.
You get rid of the yard, get rid of the trees, get rid of the little cute house, put up a disgusting concrete box, jam 10 families in there.
Now instead of one family paying one tax, you have 10 families.
Paying 10 sets of tax.
So now you have the funding for all the great social programs that you need moving forward.
And this has happened in Austin to an insane degree, where they're literally just taking entire neighborhoods and saying, from now on, you can never build a single-family home in this neighborhood.
So any house that goes down, it's got to be replaced by a condominium.
It's got to be replaced by four or five houses, no more yards.
Has to be multifamily housing.
And they're like, it's to deal with congestion.
Not congestion, but, you know, it's to deal with sprawl.
We want to stop urban sprawl.
We want to do all this other stuff.
We need, you know, low-income families need homes.
So you can't have a nice little bungalow.
You have to have, again, just, you know, brutalist apartments, 20 of them on a single plot.
That way we can maximize tax income, maximize how much money we're siphoning off.
Of the people so we can then pay for all the programs that we need to deal with all the crime and chaos and misery that our other policies cause.
So this is why you have people that are like the hippy-dippy leftist people.
Because we love Earth.
We have to stop the cows farting to save Earth.
And meanwhile, their policies result in just like wholesale total demolition of like nature itself.
Open spaces, beautiful lawns, like it all gets destroyed, paved over, and turned into a corporate monstrosity because you need the tax money to pay for all of those wonderful liberal programs that you all love so much.
And it's a system, a cycle, feedback loop that occurs constantly.
So that was a part of that video that stood out to me when they're like, we need to have all of these homes for the tax revenue.
It's like without...
Without tricking the ranchers, stealing their livelihood, paving over this land, and building a bunch of disgusting concrete boxes, then how are we going to pay for all of the people that we're bringing to live in the boxes?
How are we going to pay for drag queens to read pornography to your children?
We have all these programs.
We need a way to pay for it.
So we have to destroy your city and bring in foreigners to do that.
Like, no step of that at any point is beneficial to anybody except for the people grifting off the top and the tyrants.
So, thank God we saved the desert tortoise.
And of course, they're doing that in the Palisades.
They're doing that anywhere, you know, natural disaster strikes.
Oh, whoopsie, now we have to eliminate the Palisades.
Eliminate one of the most beautiful and iconic and desirable...
Family neighborhoods in all of America, it's going to all be track houses filled with South Americans from now on.
Thank goodness the government is here to help.
And BlackRock will make a fortune.
You're welcome.
So it looks like Trump is, has he already spoken or is he about to speak?
He's about to speak at, so it should start soon.
So let's go to this live whenever it comes on.
Whenever it comes on, we'll bring it up.
Donald Trump is going to speak after the first jobs report has been unveiled.
The U.S. added 151,000 jobs in February, and the unemployment rate rose to 4.1%.
According to a report released Friday by the Labor Department, the data shows the job market holding steady amid rising economic concerns and slumping consumer confidence.
Trump is expected to speak at 11 a.m.
Eastern Time, so that would have been 10 a.m.
Central.
So they're running a little behind, and we'll go to that whenever.
They go live.
Now I have some I have some stuff about South Africa that I want to get into and Elon Musk has been talking about this quite a bit.
I'll save that for the next segment.
We do have Oh, there's so many stories.
Sorry, we've got dead air going on here.
I should be explaining what's happening.
I've got a lot of stories.
I just want to make sure I'm hitting the really big ones.
I can't just give you the headlines.
National Science Foundation faces FOIA requests over funding of online speech moderation tools.
So the Alliance Defending Freedom Center for Free Speech has announced that it started the process of sending a series of Freedom of Information Act requests, first to address to the National Science Foundation.
The U.S. government...
Structure NSF is designated as an independent federal government agency, but now wants to be transparent about the activities and operations specifically concerning any involvement in censorship, showing that the NSF had been one of the organizations encouraging Meta, Google, Snap, X, Reddit, Wikipedia, and others to limit disinformation, hate speech, and content questioning election integrity, lab leak, or purporting misinformation, as well as a number of other terms.
Again, you just have dozens of federal agencies with millions of dollars all working independently and in coordination to censor right-wingers.
And this is basically the entirety of what our government has been involved in for the last little while.
When we get back on the other side, we'll go to Trump if he is speaking.
But if not, I have some very funny...
Things to tell you about other ways in which the Democrats are flailing hysterically and making all the wrong decisions, just every terrible decision they can, including what a disastrous embarrassment the first month of David Hogg as a vice president of the DNC has been.
He was voted to be vice chair of the DNC in pretty much within 24 hours.
He tried to scam them all and fundraise a bunch of money for himself off of the DNC, and it's only gotten worse.
They're calling it buyer's remorse.
So we'll get into that.
I also want to get into the fact that it appears as though Joe Biden might not have been totally mentally competent the whole time he was in office.
People around him knew this, took advantage of it, and were using an electronic signature to place the president's signature on Documentation agreements, maybe even laws that he never even laid his eyes on.
A gigantic scandal of monumental proportion that should represent, really, if we were a real country with a serious population, a constitutional crisis for which people would be going to jail.
We'll see what comes of it.
I'll tell you about it on the other side.
Stay with us.
unidentified
A lot of news still to get to in this final segment.
harrison smith
And we'll go to Trump's statement as soon as he starts to make it.
I'll tell you what, though.
I'll tell you what.
This article from Zero Hedge.
President Trump delivers remarks from Oval Office.
And they have a bunch of questions.
They say there's plenty of speculation about what he's going to discuss since he's been pretty busy over the last 24 hours.
Will he mention the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve?
Will he discuss blocking off funding to South Africa?
Will he bring up Ukraine's mineral deal and Russia's sanctions threat?
Will his adjustment from hatchet to scalpel approach for Doge come up?
Will he bring up Europe's rearmament plan?
Will he mock Congressman Green's outbursts?
Will he announce a federal ban on China's DeepSeek app?
So all these great questions.
One thing I know for sure is that Donald Trump will be giving an address in his own words.
He'll make it through the whole thing without collapsing in an embarrassing mess.
He'll probably take questions from the press that aren't prepared and preordained and given to him on an index card.
And he'll probably, if I had to bet, he'll probably utilize some three-syllable words and he'll make it all the way through with perfect clarity.
And that's really the major development from the previous guy, isn't it?
Donald Trump's about to give a press conference in which he will be lucid and capable, direct, and legible, understandable.
And that really, I mean, what more could you ask, right?
What more could you ask from a president than that his brain work?
And this is, honestly, may have been even a bigger deal than even we expected, even though we were reporting on it since before Biden was ever even president.
And almost insurmountable mental collapse.
Missouri Attorney General Bailey demands DOJ investigate if Biden's cognitive decline allowed staffers to make decisions without his knowledge.
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey asked the Justice Department to investigate whether White House staffers exploited Joe Biden's cognitive decline and issued far-left orders at the end of his presidency without his knowledge.
I'm demanding the DOJ investigate whether President Biden's cognitive decline allowed unelected staff to push through radical policy without his knowing approval.
If, in fact, Biden's staffers were exploiting his mental decline, those orders are null and void.
Andrew Bailey cited Joe Biden's decision to commute the federal death penalty sentences of nearly 40 prisoners on death row.
Staffers and the vice president cannot constitutionally evade accountability by laundering far-left orders through a man who does not know what he's signing.
And if this had in fact been occurring, then all the orders are void.
Biden also cited special counsel Robert Hur's report on Biden's cognitive decline, which is so funny that they, I don't even really mention that very much, but like, you know, Jake Tapper's writing a book and all these people saying, well, nobody knew Biden has declining cognitive abilities.
And like, you forget that's, what was it, four, six months before that?
You had the official report from...
Ben Hur saying, or what's his name?
Not Ben Hur.
Robert Hur saying, yeah, we're not going to charge Biden because he is mentally incompetent.
He wouldn't make it through a trial.
He's actually so incompetent that the jury might have sympathy for him and not want to convict him because how can you blame him?
He doesn't know what the hell is going on.
So it's funny that you forget that it's not...
It wasn't only obvious by observation and from anybody paying attention and just it was abundantly clear from anybody, absolutely anybody watching anything from the Biden White House.
Literally every appearance he made was a disastrous embarrassment every single time for years.
But even if you can willfully ignore that and stay ignorant from that, they did come out with an official report from a special investigator saying exactly that.
So there was really no excuse for not knowing.
Biden's mental position.
And also, of course, we point out at the time, like, alright, either he's too incompetent to stand trial and therefore too incompetent to be the president or he is competent to be the president and therefore should be brought up on charges.
But the Democrats get to have their cake and eat it too.
Now it gets even more complicated or more egregious and Because they figured out, this is from Kyle Becker on X, the House Oversight Project found that the Biden presidency was almost entirely run by auto-pin signature, electronic printed signature.
Quote, we gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of the presidency.
All of them used the same auto-pin signature except for the announcement that the former president was dropping out of the race last year.
Here is the auto-pin signature.
This is criminal.
The Biden presidency didn't have a real president.
People should go to jail for this.
And so they show that Joe Biden, every time his signature appeared on any document, it was the same signature.
They just have this image of his signature, and they would just affix it to documents, possibly without his knowledge or knowing approval.
And I wonder, I didn't see in this report, but there were multiple times...
When Biden actually claimed he didn't do things that he had done, and a lot of people just put that up to like, well, he's just an incompetent old coot.
He's just memory loss or something.
But is it not maybe more likely that he genuinely didn't think he did something?
I'm blanking on an exact example, like detailed example, but there were multiple times this, and one of them may have been the like, Letting out thousands of prisoners.
There's one towards the end of his presidency where he's asked, like, why did you do this?
And he's like, I didn't do that.
We didn't do that.
That's ridiculous.
And he, like, walked away.
And it's like, no, he definitely signed an order to do that.
So either he doesn't know what orders he's signing.
He forgot about them.
He didn't understand the question that was at.
Like, something is seriously wrong here.
And if it turns out that his underlings were...
Affixing his electronic signature to things that he had no awareness of, that is a very big crime.
That is treason, that is sedition, that is usurpation of the supreme executive authority in our country by unelected bureaucrats who had no right to make these decisions.
That's a constitutional crisis, and you have to undo that.
You can't just say...
Moving forward, don't do that anymore.
You have to punish people that did it, find out what orders they implemented without his knowledge, and then undo them, reverse them, strike them from the record.
There he is, wandering off into a rainforest.
I'm pretty sure that's the last video I've seen of Joe Biden.
Has he been seen in public since?
Oh, and there's Podesta.
He's there too.
alex jones
Yeah.
harrison smith
So it was worse than we even thought, and luckily some AGs are looking into this, but you really got to drive that home, because we got to find...
I'm sure listeners listening to us right now know what I'm talking about.
I just can't think of an exact example, but there were many, many times where...
And we were always just like, yeah, Biden doesn't know what the hell's going on.
But like, no, Biden doesn't know what the hell's going on, meaning that...
He's not the one making the decisions, meaning that we don't know who is or what their motives are, who they are, and who is paying them to do the things that they're doing.
Total unaccountability, total lawlessness, total usurpation of the actual democratic process.
Crazy, crazy this is allowed to happen.
I swear it's on the tip of my tongue.
There's something in particular where he was asked, Why he did something.
And he straight up said, I did not do that.
I never signed that.
When he definitely had.
But he didn't know he had.
We don't even know if he deliberately withdrew from the race.
I mean, there's a lot of very valid speculation that the announcement that was posted, the PDF that was posted on his ex-account saying, actually, I don't want to run for president anymore.
He might not have had any knowledge that that was being put out.
They may have been forcing his hand at that point.
They may have just gotten used to doing that over the last several years.
Meanwhile, Washington whispers there's growing frustration and buyer's remorse among Democrats over new DNC Vice Chair David Hogg.
The choice of gun control activist David Hogg as Vice Chair of the DNC last month was met with controversy given his age and experience and far-left position on various issues.
Also, the...
The radius, or rather, it's his wrist.
There's something about the thinness of his wrist that really has a lot of people questioning whether he shouldn't be connected to some sort of feeding tube, let alone running the DNC. Just weeks after Hogg's appointment to the position, he was accused of using DNC resources to promote his personal PAC, which pays him a six-figure salary.
Now there are more rumblings behind the scenes about what Hogg is advocating for the Democratic Party, which is already mired in ongoing identity crisis and public meltdown.
This information is coming from a source on Twitter, or on X, known as Bad Hombre, so it should be taken with a grain of salt.
Well, I don't see the I don't see the issue personally.
Finally, A Democrat party headed by a person whose ideas are extravagant, wasteful, and radical?
That's a match made in heaven, folks.
You cannot find a more appropriate spokesperson and avatar for the Democrats than somebody wasteful, extravagant, who spends money on himself.
You're telling me that David Hogg, he got into a position of authority that has obligations to fulfill, and instead of fulfilling those obligations, To benefit himself, his own pet causes, ignoring the obligations and requirements of the position as stated.
I mean, I'm shocked, folks.
You're telling me the Democrats are going through this?
Every time a Democrat gets in a position of power, it doesn't, you know, I've described before like the mafia.
Gets into a trade union.
That's not the trade union infiltrating the mafia, right?
He's not there to make sure that the mafia's resources are helping to contribute to fulfilling the obligations and responsibilities of the trade union position they're in.
They are now avatars of the mafia who now is using the trade union to achieve the mafia's goals.
This is what the Democrats do.
When you put a Democrat as a judge, They're not sitting there going, how can I be the best judge I can be?
I have to put my personal biases aside.
I'm now an avatar of the state.
I have an obligation to fulfill this role in an unbiased and lawful way.
To them, they're just like, I have the power.
Now I have power and I get to use it to achieve my ends.
Across the board, folks, people might be sick of me of saying this, but really think about...
How widespread this mindset is and the fact that this mindset is now the thing taking down the Democratic Party is beautiful.
It's dramatic irony of divine order, right?
When leftists make movies, are they making the best movies they can make or are they hijacking the movie to ham-fistedly shoehorn in their own ideology, hijack, The movie profession itself in order to shove their bad ideas down our throat and try to, you know, progress their own agenda.
And they end up making terrible movies, right?
When you put a leftist in a, or, you know, you put, and for some reason Somalians are really open about this.
You put Ilhan Omar.
Is she then like, okay, I'm now a congresswoman.
I now am supposed to represent all of my constituents, and I'm here to serve America and the American ideal.
No, she gives speeches where she's like, everything I do is for Somalia.
You put me in this position, and now this position is the Somali activist position.
It's not a congresswoman anymore.
Democratic judges are not judges.
They are Democrat activists in judge robes.
And David Hogg, not the vice chair of the DNC, doing his best to progress the DNC. He has simply accrued the power of the DNC to progress his own agenda, his own personal aggrandizement, and his own pet projects.
So you deserve this.
So you're getting a taste of your own medicine now.
During one meeting, Hogg proposed that the party invest $600 million in creating a social media platform exclusively for registered Democrats to compete with X and Truth Social.
He also suggested that he would serve as the platform's CEO. This rubbed his co-vice chairs the wrong way, who view it as another hog money grab.
Gee, so not only is he hijacking the authority of a position for his own ends, not fulfilling his basic obligations, not only is he personally extravagant and, you know, just siphoning money away.
He's pissing off his co-chairs.
And he's spending other people's money with total abandon and a complete disregard of the value of money at all.
I'm telling you, he is the perfect DNC co-chair.
He's perfect.
He gets into office and he's immediately like, let's start cutting $600 million checks to me and my friends.
Can we do that?
Isn't that what we do?
And frankly, it's confusing that the Democrats are shocked by this.
Their response should be, yes, David Hogg, you're a natural.
You've slotted into this role like a fish in water.
You were born for this.
He's really just proving what a good Democrat he truly is.
Put him in a position of power and he's immediately cutting out.
Incomprehensively large amounts of money.
$600 million.
unidentified
He's like, hey, how about we use that money to make a company for me?
harrison smith
I mean, the icing on the cake is that it's a terrible idea overall.
The icing on the cake is that it is not just an inordinately large investment.
It would be an inordinately large investment into a terrible idea that would absolutely fail.
So, he's a Democrat.
I mean, I don't know what the problem is.
More recently, Hogg has clashed with centrist and moderate party insiders over his endorsement of more militant and disruptive tactics.
Oh, so he's a leftist extremist that's delusional enough to think that aggressive, violent action is the way forward.
No, yeah, this, I don't know, I genuinely, I'm...
Everything I've read so far is part and parcel, 100%, hand-in-glove, perfect representation of who the Democrats are.
Similar to those used by Democrats during President Trump's address to Congress, Hogg has also advocated for establishing a bail fund to support elected Democrat representatives at the local and state level who choose to take a more radical approach.
Well, I mean, again, I cannot think of a better representation for the Democrats as a whole, their ideology, their tactics.
It's all perfect.
This is all perfect.
So, again, just like we went over the other day, when it comes to the Democrats and the division they're experiencing, I'm on the side of Whoopi Goldberg and David Hogg, folks.
These are your saviors.
These are the people you need to listen to.
These are the people that are going to lead your party into the bright, sunny uplands of future success.
David Hogg, Whoopi Goldberg, you need to double down on the racism.
You need to double down on the...
Bizarre TikTok propaganda.
You need to double down on the siphoning money away from everybody, building yourself up, and trying to compete with X. These are all brilliant, good things.
If the Democrats want my advice, it's stay the course, folks.
Stay the course.
They're making it too easy.
Now, when it comes to Ukraine, there are some pretty major developments, and it seems to be happening at a breakneck speed, and it's hard to get a handle on what exactly the position is now.
And this is coming from both sides.
Zelensky is not even a day-to-day thing.
It's almost an hourly-to-hourly thing.
Zelensky says, we're going to fight to the end.
We'll never give up.
Later that afternoon, you hear Zelensky's open to negotiations.
The next day, Zelensky will never step down.
He'll fight to the end, but also he's willing to step down if they join NATO, but also they don't want to join NATO. But also Europe is demanding America give more money, but also they're enemies with America now and have to raise money themselves to go to war with Russia.
It's like nobody knows what the hell anybody else is doing.
Russia's not immune from this.
And, you know, in that case, stories I have from this morning in the Daily Dispatch are...
No longer even relevant because they've changed their position again.
So this is from this morning.
EU militarization, peace talks, and Putin's next moves.
Russia said it's maintaining contact with the US on Ukraine but has yet to receive any updates from Washington on who will lead negotiations.
Meanwhile, Putin insists that the Istanbul agreements could serve as the foundation for a peace treaty, a position Moscow claims has also been echoed by the US. At the same time, the Kremlin is closely watching the EU's increasing militarization.
Warning.
That it directly contradicts efforts to reach a peaceful resolution in Ukraine.
According to Kremlin spokesperson Peskov, Brussels is now officially positioned to Russia as its main adversary, signaling a deeper divide between Moscow and the West.
Of course, we covered yesterday the statement by France that basically they would be the nuclear umbrella and were willing to go to direct nuclear conflict with Russia.
Has responded to that by saying, okay, I mean, I guess if that's what you want to do, we can do that.
Moscow reacts fiercely to Macron's nuclear rhetoric, calling it nuclear blackmail, asking what can France's 209 warheads do against the massive 6,000-strong Russian arsenal?
The latest from Putin.
Is that he is said to be ready to agree to a Ukraine truce with conditions.
Russia is willing to discuss a temporary truce in Ukraine, provided there is progress towards a final peace settlement, according to people familiar with the matter in Moscow.
In the first signal of a positive response from President Vladimir Putin to U.S. counterpart Donald Trump's call for a ceasefire, the offer was conveyed last month.
In talks in Saudi Arabia between top Russian and American officials, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing internal policy.
In order to agree to a cessation of hostilities, there would have to be a clear understanding about the framework principles of the final peace accord, two people with knowledge of the matter said.
Russia will insist on, in particular, on establishing the parameters of eventual peacekeeping mission, including agreeing on which countries would take part, said another person familiar with the issue.
So again, it does appear as though we are creeping towards peace in Ukraine.
The looming specter of peace overshadows the European continent.
Don Trump just posted this on Truth Social.
Based on the fact that Russia is absolutely pounding Ukraine on the battlefield right now, I'm strongly considering large-scale banking sanctions, sanctions, and tariffs on Russia until a ceasefire and final settlement agreement on peace is reached.
To Russia and Ukraine, get to the table right now before it's too late.
Thank you.
So there, you know, I guess Trump is sort of getting fed up with the slow movement, constant vacillations between people on both sides of these.
So while he's been largely conciliatory towards Putin and Russia, during his time in office, it looks like he's now threatening to reverse that and basically saying to Russia and Ukraine, like, we need to get this done now or else I guess I'm going to have to start pressuring Russia.
Banking sanctions, trade sanctions and tariffs on Russia until a ceasefire and final settlement agreement on peace is reached.
So Trump's reading off executive orders right now.
We only have a minute left in this program.
I'm sure Alex Jones will pick this up on the other side.
Finally, I just want to point out this same attorney general from Missouri who's talking about investigating the fact that Biden was incompetent and his administration was a farce is making Elon Musk aware of a $5 billion wasted taxpayer dollar.
Allocated to fund a green energy scam that was in fact a massive land grab from Missouri farmers and landowners.
This of course sort of dovetails with the story that we just showed you of the ranchers who were forced off their land to preserve the desert tortoise, only to have that land immediately handed over to developers to build multifamily housing on to increase the tax base.
So, the Green New Deal.
In its entirety, 100%, from top to bottom, back to front, it is a gigantic scam that a whole variety of people are using for a whole host of different reasons, none of which have anything to do with environmentalism, all of which diminish your freedom and benefit the corporate moneyed players in our corrupt and collapsing system.
That's going to be it for us, folks.
Hope you've enjoyed this week.
We'll be back on Monday, of course.
Stay tuned for Alex Jones in 90 seconds.
And in the meantime, go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison, thealexjonesstore.com to get the best products available anywhere.
We've got new products launching, I think, today.
So stay tuned to Alex Jones and go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison to see what new products will be available later today.
And you're going to want to see these.
I've seen some of the mock-ups behind the scenes, and there's a lot of great stuff coming to thealexjonesstore.com.
Export Selection