Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Just how much of the Great Reset has already dug its blood-soaked talons into modern civilization? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've got a message for all illegals. | |
| If you don't want to be pushed back, if you don't want to be arrested, if you don't want to be shot, don't come to our borders. | ||
| Do not come to the Polish border. | ||
| Then you're safe. | ||
| It's not us. | ||
| It's not our police who came up to beat you up, to push you, or to arrest you. | ||
| It's you who tried to break the law on our land. | ||
| The signs of sabotage are numerous and widespread as the vultures of great reset tyranny circle a sickened and angered populace that is on track for a mass starvation event in the very near future. | ||
| We're seeing this madness spread everywhere now. | ||
| In Ireland, they're going to call 200,000 cows over three years to meet the net zero climate goals. | ||
| Germany, this is their German newspaper, The Daily Bill, one sausage per month, according to the government's new proposal with the German Nutritional Society. | ||
| This is real. | ||
| It's happening. | ||
| It's not theoretical. | ||
| We're not talking about down the road. | ||
| You know, when you know that agenda 2030 is simply a milestone year within that 100-year period. | ||
| The milestone years are 2020, 2025, 2030, and 2050. They really fully expect to have this entire plan locked up and completed by 2050. If you go to America2050.org, | ||
| which is a Ford Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation project, you'll get a look at what their idea is for, in fact, what they want the United States to devolve into, which is to destroy the sense of having a unified... | ||
| Union and to in fact not have 50 states any longer to have 11 mega regions and in fact what this plan does is it destroys the the actual the concept of the nation-state and it completely destroys it and devolves it into the city-states. | ||
| Or regions. | ||
| And these are not, you know, like individual cities like, say, San Francisco or New York. | ||
| These are regions that are governed by megacities, which are huge, enormous cities. | ||
| It could be part of Washington State, part of Oregon, part of Idaho, and part of British Columbia. | ||
| So it breaks the national borders, it breaks state borders, breaks, of course, county and city borders. | ||
| And this is about destroying your ability to actually... | ||
| Be able to control what it is that happens to you. | ||
| It's a global plan, but they implement it locally. | ||
|
unidentified
|
People depend on you for what's left of the food. | |
| You control them. | ||
| Where food is abundant and cheap, you do not control them. | ||
| Where energy is cheap and abundant, you do not control them. | ||
| Scarcity equals dependency equals control. | ||
| And that's why they're targeting the food chain, they're targeting the energy supply, they're targeting everything. | ||
| French President Emmanuel Macron's country has been flooded with the United Nations' self-proclaimed Replacement migration, regardless of what the propaganda denying its existence would have you believe, Macron is now priming the pump for energy crises and food shortages as the World Economic Forum once again tightens its grip on the neck of the French people. | ||
| Disgraced California Governor Gavin Newsom has said the quiet part out loud. | ||
| Pushing California towards a goal of zero emissions by 2035. In the next 15 years, we will eliminate in the state of California the sales of internal combustion engines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Extreme heat will grip much of the state through the Labor Day weekend. | |
| This morning, Governor Gavin Newsom is laying out ways you can stay safe and prevent putting a strain on the electrical grid over the upcoming days. | ||
| Let's listen in. | ||
| We voluntarily ask you to do a little bit more to help us get through the next week or so. | ||
| Turn, interestingly, up a little bit. | ||
| The thermostat at home to 78 degrees. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Try to pre-cool earlier in the day the home. | |
| Try not to use too much electricity in those key hours. | ||
| And the key hours are between 4 p.m. | ||
| and 9 p.m. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If we are not able to ask skeptical questions, to interrogate those who tell us that something is true, to be skeptical of those in authority... | |
| Then we're up for grabs for the next charlatan, political, religious who comes ambling along. | ||
| John Bowne. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Thursday, February 27th in the year of Our Lord 2025. And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| I think it's time to blow this thing. | ||
| Get everybody in the stuff together. | ||
| Okay, three, two. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this Thursday morning, February 27, 2025, from Austin, Texas. | ||
| We've got a lot to talk about today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We've been talking about all sorts of stuff. | |
| The Epstein release slated for today. | ||
| We'll see exactly what we're going to get from that. | ||
| We'll look at what Pam Bondi, announcements Pam Bondi has made. | ||
| Concerning the release that should be happening a little bit later today. | ||
| I'm also going to be talking about free speech in Europe. | ||
| It's going away at a terrifying speed. | ||
| As well as just, you know, general geopolitics. | ||
| Probably take your calls as well. | ||
| We've got a pre-recorded interview we did with Brianna Morello about some very interesting developments in the TSA. The FBI in particular, James Comey today. | ||
| He's been making the news quite a bit. | ||
| Let's begin with... | ||
| Oh, what should we begin? | ||
| Oh man, we have a lot of good stuff today. | ||
| Let's just begin with clip number five because... | ||
|
unidentified
|
I still... | |
| I mean, I know it's been a little over a month. | ||
| But I feel like I still have the same feeling... | ||
| And I felt, excuse me, on that November night in 2016 going, it's real? | ||
| Wait, it really happened? | ||
| Wait, Donald Trump is actually our president? | ||
| It was unbelievable then. | ||
| It's even more unbelievable now the way things have turned out. | ||
| And I just want to play this quick video. | ||
| Just reminding everybody, one, what a force Donald Trump is. | ||
| The entertainment he's given us over the last decade has been unparalleled. | ||
| But two, just the petulant bitchiness of the average reporter when they're talking to the president of the United States. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number five. | ||
| Between you people, don't talk to me that way. | ||
| You're just a lightweight. | ||
| Don't talk to me that way. | ||
| I'm the president of the United States. | ||
| Don't ever talk to the president that way. | ||
| Well, I'll give you voters. | ||
| I will give you voter suppression. | ||
| You just have to sit down, please. | ||
| Sit down. | ||
| I didn't call you. | ||
| A question? | ||
| Yeah, go ahead. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| She's shocked that I picked her. | ||
| It's like in a state of shock. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm not thinking, Mr. President. | |
| That's okay. | ||
| I know you're not thinking. | ||
| You never do. | ||
| How many people had died in the United States? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So do you acknowledge that you didn't think he was going to spread? | |
| Keep your voice down, please. | ||
| Keep your voice down. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You want him to rein in Robert Mueller? | |
| What a stupid question that is. | ||
| What a stupid question. | ||
| But I watch you a lot. | ||
| You ask a lot of stupid questions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask my question. | |
| You've been asking a question for 10 minutes. | ||
| Please sit down. | ||
| Look, look. | ||
| You know you're a fake. | ||
| You know that your whole network, the way you cover it, is fake. | ||
| And most of you, and not all of you. | ||
| But the people are wise to you. | ||
| That's why you have a lower approval rating than you've ever had before, times probably three. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Americans who are scared, though, I guess. | |
| Nearly 200 dead, 14,000 who are sick, millions, as you witnessed, who are scared right now. | ||
| What do you say to Americans who are watching you right now, who are scared? | ||
| I say that you're a terrible reporter. | ||
| That's what I say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You've said repeatedly that you think that some of the equipment that governors are requesting, they don't actually need. | |
| You said New York might not need 30,000. | ||
| You said it on Sean Hannity's Fox News. | ||
| You said that you might... | ||
| Why don't you people act... | ||
| Let me ask you. | ||
| Why don't you act in a little more positive? | ||
| It's always trying to get you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My question to you is... | |
| Get you, get you. | ||
| And you know what? | ||
| That's why nobody trusts the media anymore. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My question to you is how is that going to impact? | |
| Excuse me, you didn't hear me. | ||
| That's why you used to work for the... | ||
| Let's give it a shot. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Governor Cuomo, as you played in that clip, has indeed praised a lot of what the federal government has done, but he... | ||
| Excuse me. | ||
| Excuse me. | ||
| He didn't say a lot. | ||
| He said we did a phenomenal job. | ||
| He didn't say a lot. | ||
| He didn't say you did a good job on ventilators but nothing else. | ||
| No, he said we did a phenomenal job. | ||
| So report accurately, because you are one of the most inaccurate reporters. | ||
| People have been... | ||
| Just absolutely excoriated by some of the fake news like you, you're CNN, you're fake news. | ||
| And let me just tell you, they were excoriated by people like you that don't know any better because you don't have the brains you were born with. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why are you saying that to me specifically? | |
| I'm telling you, I'm not saying it specifically to anybody. | ||
| I'm saying it to anybody that would ask a nasty question like that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's not a nasty question. | |
| Please go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why does it matter? | |
| Okay. | ||
| Anybody else? | ||
| Please go ahead in the back, please. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have two questions. | |
| No, it's okay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But you pointed to me. | |
| I have two questions, Mr. President. | ||
| Next, please. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You called on me. | |
| I did, and you didn't respond, and now I'm calling on the young lady in the back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Please. | |
| I just wanted to let my colleague finish, but can I ask you a question? | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| But you called on me. | ||
| You called on me, though. | ||
| You called on me. | ||
| Isn't it nice having a real president again? | ||
| Compare that to Joe Biden. | ||
| Just like, did you enjoy your ice cream today, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Him just like, I'll enjoy whatever I want to enjoy. | |
| He just like falls over. | ||
| He just collapses onto the ground. | ||
| It's amazing having a president that can actually field questions. | ||
| It just sucks having reporters that are all middle school mean girls. | ||
| Hey, you can't have everything. | ||
| Of course, yesterday, Donald Trump held his first cabinet meeting. | ||
| Open to the world. | ||
| RFK Jr., J.D. Vance, Elon Musk, all sitting there. | ||
| And Donald Trump managing the whole thing. | ||
| And again, you just think about the last four years of just utter incompetence at the White House. | ||
| And frankly, it's amazing. | ||
| It's amazing we're still here. | ||
| Like I said, we have a lot of stuff to go to, including other examples of the Trump administration scorching fake news reporters left and right. | ||
| But some big things happening today. | ||
| Let's just get into it, shall we? | ||
| Shall we hear it as your daily dispatch? | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 27th of February 2025. | ||
| Attorney General Pam Bondi announces Epstein flight logs and names will be dropping on Thursday. | ||
| That's today. | ||
| Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Justice Department plans to release information regarding billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein on Thursday, including flight logs, names, and other information. | ||
| In fact, let's go ahead and go to clip one here. | ||
| This is Pam Bondi on Fox News announcing the revelation that will happen later today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You said last week that you have the Epstein files on your desk. | |
| When can we see them and what's taking so long to release them? | ||
| I do. | ||
| Jesse, there are well over, this will make you sick, 200 victims. | ||
| 200. Well over. | ||
| Over 250, actually. | ||
| So we have to make sure that their identity is protected and their personal information. | ||
| But other than that... | ||
| I think tomorrow, you know, the personal information of victims. | ||
| Other than that, I think tomorrow, Jesse, breaking news right now, you're going to see some Epstein information being released by my office. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What kind? | |
| Are we going to see who was on the flights? | ||
| Are we going to see any evidence from what he recorded because he had all of his homes wired with recording devices? | ||
| What you're going to see... | ||
| Hopefully tomorrow is a lot of flight logs, a lot of names, a lot of information. | ||
| But it's pretty sick what that man did. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Along with his co-defendant. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| And he had help. | ||
| That's for sure. | ||
| He sure did. | ||
| So we'll receive some information. | ||
| They say they're redacting it just to preserve the privacy of the victims. | ||
| However, we'll... | ||
| We'll judge that once we see it. | ||
| So we'll receive some information today. | ||
| Slow rolling the release. | ||
| Not sure why they're doing that. | ||
| Just go ahead and release it all. | ||
| Victims are, I don't know. | ||
| I guess you can keep the victim's name private, but how long is that really going to take? | ||
| Anyway, we'll get back into that and talk about Jeffrey Epstein a little bit more later. | ||
| Meanwhile, Supreme Court pauses order for Trump admin to pay $2 billion in foreign aid by midnight. | ||
| Chief Justice John Roberts on Wednesday paused a court-imposed midnight deadline that would have required the Trump administration to release $2 billion in frozen foreign aid, a goal the government has claimed it's unable to meet. | ||
| The emergency appeal marks the first time President Donald Trump's efforts to drastically remake the federal government, including the deep cuts across government agencies, have reached the nation's highest court. | ||
| This case appears likely to put the justices on a collision course with Trump's sweeping efforts to consolidate power within the executive branch. | ||
| Roberts order does not resolve the underlying question raised by the case. | ||
| Rather, it imposes what's known as an administrative stay to give the court a few more days to review written arguments in the case. | ||
| Roberts is the justice designated to handle emergency cases from the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C. So in other words, Trump froze foreign aid. | ||
| Some judge somewhere said you have to. | ||
| You have to pay for it. | ||
| Apparently some judge somewhere, and who was it yesterday that was like, you know, there's over 700 federal judges throughout the United States. | ||
| That's almost two times as many congressmen as there are. | ||
| So the way that we have our system set up now, there's essentially some AOC out there somewhere who just has veto power over everything the president wants to do, including foreign policy decisions, Asinine and not the way that our system is supposed to work. | ||
| So these judges need to be impeached. | ||
| And we'll talk a lot about corrupt judges today because apparently they're all completely corrupt. | ||
| Some of them, one of the guys, I'm not sure if it was this judge or another one who put another stay on something else Trump wanted to do. | ||
| But he became a U.S. citizen in 2019 and he's still a dual citizen with Canada. | ||
| We've got federal judges. | ||
| That became American citizens five years ago? | ||
| That's not right. | ||
| That's wrong. | ||
| That's not right. | ||
| And he shouldn't be a judge. | ||
| That's wrong. | ||
| Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos rebrands Washington Post as billionaire's think tank. | ||
| That's a funny way to put it from unheard. | ||
| One of the world's richest men wants his newspaper to push policies that favor the rich. | ||
| That's the upshot of Jeff Bezos' announcement today of a new regime at the Washington Post. | ||
| Henceforth. | ||
| The Amazon boss decreed his paper comment pages will promote libertarianism, free markets, and personal liberty and will not publish opinions contradicting these central principles. | ||
| This is a hilarious way to frame all this. | ||
| But yeah, basically, Jeff Bezos came out and said, yeah, Washington Post. | ||
| It was funny. | ||
| He wrote a letter that was like, Washington Post. | ||
| Basically, his argument is like, we've had too many opinions. | ||
| It's been too broad of a spectrum. | ||
| On the Washington Post opinion pages. | ||
| Nobody who's reading this is just like, you think the problem is that there's too big of a diversity of views? | ||
| That's insane. | ||
| But apparently he's fired the opinion editor and is now trying to hire a new one, one that will promote the free market and what were the two things? | ||
| Free market and personal liberty, which according to leftist means It's going to become a mouthpiece for the rich because that's how far, that's how deeply saturated their communism is in their minds and in the mindset of people around this country. | ||
| They literally hear personal freedom and they think fascism. | ||
| That's how crazy they are. | ||
| They hear personal freedom and free markets and they're like, oh. | ||
| You mean fascism and billionaires? | ||
| These are fundamental freedoms at the very core of our existence as a nation. | ||
| But you people are so far gone, you can't even recognize it anymore. | ||
| Meanwhile, State Department completes foreign funding review, identifying 15,000 grants worth $60 billion for elimination. | ||
| This effort will balance genuine humanitarian effort with the need to use taxpayer dollars wisely to advance American interests at home and abroad. | ||
| The internal memo says President Donald Trump's State Department completed its review of U.S. foreign aid, identifying nearly 15,000 grants worth $60 billion for elimination, an internal memo reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon shows. | ||
| The review pertained to foreign aid that flowed from both the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development. | ||
| Within the State Department, auditors reviewed more than 9,100 grants worth an estimated $15.9 billion and identified 4,100 of those grants worth $4.4 billion for elimination. | ||
| Again, you know what I think about this. | ||
| I don't think they should be eliminated. | ||
| I think actual Americans and people that support the ideas that we agree with should be getting $60 billion a year to change the world to fit our ideology. | ||
| Then maybe we could save this country. | ||
| But instead, they're just eliminating all of this. | ||
| You know, foreign funding. | ||
| And then if I had to bet on it, if I had to put some skin on the table, make a bet on it, I'd say that our taxes are not going to go down at all. | ||
| This is like when the airline automates everything, does all these cost-saving measures so they don't have to hire anybody. | ||
| So instead of having somebody check your bag, you have to check it yourself. | ||
| Instead of having somebody print your ticket, you have to print it yourself. | ||
| And somehow your plane ticket, the cost doesn't go down. | ||
| Somehow they eliminate, you know, millions of dollars of jobs to save money, and somehow the price keeps going up. | ||
| That's, I imagine, what's going to happen with us. | ||
| And we're going to have, you know, eliminating massive sections of the government and then still paying the same amount somehow. | ||
| But if I had to guess, I think that's what's going to happen. | ||
| Which again, I just want... | ||
| It's not about the money, it's about where it's going and how it's being spent. | ||
| And I'd like to see gigantic patronage networks of right-wingers funded to pay... | ||
| And we can get into where some of these funds are going. | ||
| We talked a little bit about the Norm Eisen $17 million fund. | ||
| And all he created was like a Muppet show. | ||
| He created some weird... | ||
| A puppet show, apparently, that they did a couple episodes and they all have less than 200 views on YouTube. | ||
| And this is a very convenient money laundering system for them. | ||
| Basically, they go, yeah, we're going to produce a podcast. | ||
| It's going to cost $18 million. | ||
| They get the $18 million. | ||
| They spend $10,000 of it to create a podcast that nobody listens to. | ||
| And then they re-up the $18 million the next year, saying what an incredible success they've had. | ||
| Because again... | ||
| If you're in the public world, not the private world, you don't actually have to do anything to earn your money. | ||
| You don't have to actually prove that it was worth it. | ||
| They just keep giving you money. | ||
| And I just... | ||
| I think it'd be nice to have $18 million to make a podcast. | ||
| People would actually listen to ones that we made, but... | ||
| Whatever. | ||
| I guess only the left gets to use taxpayer dollars to progress their agenda. | ||
| We're doing it alone, as always. | ||
| Finally, we have this IRS to shutter 120 offices nationwide. | ||
| The Trump administration is moving forward with plans to shut down more than 120 IRS offices that provide taxpayer assistance as part of a broader effort to reduce the federal government's footprint and cut costs. | ||
| The decision outlined in a letter by the U.S. General Services Administration obtained by the Washington Post comes at a crucial time, right in the middle of a federal tax filing season, which ends April 15th. | ||
| This move follows recent layoffs of approximately 7,000 probationary IRS employees and aligns with the administration's push to decrease the agency's headcount. | ||
| The closures will impact at least 128 taxpayer assistance centers across the country where filers can receive free in-person tax help by appointment. | ||
| It remains unclear whether these centers will be relocated or permanently closed. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| That's your daily dispatch. | ||
| I just wonder, does anybody actually go to these? | ||
| Offices? | ||
| Does anybody actually utilize any of these things that the government is apparently doing? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Government apparently just has infinite resources for people that just don't know how to do things on their own for themselves. | ||
| It all seems like a giant scam to me. | ||
| Now we're going to talk a lot about James Comey today as there are actually kind of multiple investigations going on with him. | ||
| When we get back on the other side, I'll go to an extended video of him being absolutely exposed on Fox News. | ||
| Because these people are just literal criminals. | ||
| So they just need to be arrested. | ||
| And apparently there are moves being made in that way. | ||
| But it's not just James Comey. | ||
| It's literally all of them. | ||
| Let's go to clip number two here. | ||
| This is CIA Director Mike Morrell, or this is a story about CIA Director Mike Morrell asking John Brennan if he could help overthrow the U.S. government during the 2020 elections. | ||
| Again, we've covered this before, but this is the latest from John Solomon with just the news and a revelation he's made. | ||
| Let's go to clip number two. | ||
| Here is the news. | ||
| Just a short while ago, just the news obtained this email. | ||
| This is a very important email. | ||
| It comes from the former CIA director, Mike Murrell. | ||
| Yes, the guy that organized that letter from the 51 intelligence professionals who tried to fake you into thinking that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation when it wasn't. | ||
| It is between him and John Brennan, one of the signatories. | ||
| You know who John Brennan is? | ||
| He was Obama's CIA director, right? | ||
| He's the guy that told Obama, hey, Hillary Clinton is doing a dirty trick on Donald Trump called Russia collusion. | ||
| Well, this is just before the presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. | ||
| Hunter Biden's laptop is flinging out there. | ||
| This is what Mike Murrell, former CIA director, tells his successor, John Brennan, hey, sign this letter because I'm, quote, trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue. | ||
| A man with a security clearance, a man with the title of CIA director. | ||
| Knew that he wasn't creating an intelligence product, an American civic duty with 51 people. | ||
| He was trying to create a political moment, damning evidence. | ||
| We'll try to find out if Congress has this letter, but this is a very important piece. | ||
| It is the ultimate proof that what went out on that letter was a political dirty trick coordinated with the Biden campaign. | ||
| And, you know, you almost forget. | ||
| But we'll show the video of James Comey on the other side, and a lot of it has to do with things like the Steele dossier, which was, of course, Russian disinformation. | ||
| And it just, it's almost unbelievable how backwards everything is when they're literally using Russian disinformation to start spying on the Trump campaign. | ||
| When that fails, they call, they say, Trump is falling for Russian disinformation. | ||
| And say Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation. | ||
| All of this, of course, designed in the first place to increase friction with Russia because they knew they were going to go to war with Ukraine and they wanted everybody on the same page. | ||
| Yeah, we'll get back into that in just a second. | ||
| In the meantime, let's go to clip number 13. Scott Jennings, I'm very jealous of. | ||
| He gets to have the best time ever. | ||
| He goes into CNN and just gets to absolutely school them on the Constitution. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Both of you all made an interesting point, which is that your view is that Trump is shredding the Constitution. | ||
| I'd like to hear more about that. | ||
| But it seems to me that you all both believe that the unelected part of our government, the bureaucracy, has a responsibility to resist the political leadership. | ||
| Is that your view? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's not actually what we said. | |
| We said they are upholding the Constitution, the principles of the Constitution. | ||
| How is Trump shredding the Constitution? | ||
|
unidentified
|
My God, he's a... | |
| I mean, seriously, do we have to give you a civics lesson that we have... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
|
unidentified
|
...that we've put all power in the executive branch? | |
| The legislative branch, the FBI, now we're in control of the military, we're silencing media. | ||
| This is what you do in a dictatorship. | ||
| Are you suggesting that the president is not the commander-in-chief of the military? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I am suggesting that the president is going to put in charge somebody who is going to contravene the Constitution. | |
| And at some near point, this conversation will look very silly for you because it would be obvious. | ||
| And right now, you're gaslighting. | ||
| But when we get to the actual brother of the road of this, it will be clear. | ||
| I'm interested in this conversation. | ||
| He's going to put someone in charge who will contravene the Constitution. | ||
| Like, who? | ||
| What do you mean by that? | ||
| The president is in charge of the military, is he not? | ||
| You said he's gonna put someone in charge of the military? | ||
| The president is in charge of the military. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That is how it works. | |
| This is important conversation. | ||
| They literally have no idea what's going on. | ||
| They're lost. | ||
| They're confused. | ||
| It's very sad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back folks. | |
| I'm Harry Smith here watching the American Journal. | ||
| We've got a lot of videos to get to you today. | ||
| We're going to start with this little expose. | ||
| It's a little bit longer. | ||
| Usually I don't play videos this long, but the whole thing is absolutely worth it. | ||
| And it's James Comey being confronted with his abject dishonesty. | ||
| And it's almost like this stuff is so crazy. | ||
| You like, forget how crazy it is. | ||
| It's like, oh yeah, James Comey, he was like treasonous. | ||
| He like, you know, weaponized the FBI against Donald Trump. | ||
| Kind of forget the details a little bit. | ||
| At least I do. | ||
| At least I do. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| The details all get mixed up for me and it just, you're just left with a feeling, a sense of vibe of James Comey being utterly corrupt, totally abusive of his power, completely in bed with the Democrats. | ||
| And so it's worth it to revisit and just remind ourselves just how many egregious violations and blatant lies we were confronted with during the witch hunt against Donald Trump. | ||
| Let's go down to clip number six here. | ||
| This is James Comey exposed. | ||
| I don't see the disconnect between the two of us, and I'm sorry that I'm missing it. | ||
| Here are you and the Inspector General Michael Horowitz answering the same question. | ||
| Do you think this is vindication? | ||
| It is. | ||
| I mean, the FBI's had to wait two years while the president and his followers lied about the institution. | ||
| Finally, the truth gets told. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Does your report vindicate Mr. Comey? | |
| It doesn't vindicate anyone at the FBI who touched this, including the leadership. | ||
| The IG says you should feel no vindication. | ||
| Well, maybe it turns upon how we understand the word. | ||
| What I mean is that the FBI was accused of treason, of illegal spying, of tapping Mr. Trump's wires illegally, of opening an investigation without justification, of being a criminal conspiracy to unseat defeat and then unseat a president. | ||
| All of that was nonsense. | ||
| Here is what you said about the FISA process and what the Inspector General Horowitz said this week. | ||
| Take a look. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have total confidence that the FISA process was followed and that the entire case was handled in a thoughtful, responsible way by DOJ and the FBI. We identified significant inaccuracies and omissions in each of the four applications. | |
| Seven in the first application and a total of 17 by the final renewal application. | ||
| Seventeen. | ||
| Significant errors in the FISA process, and you say that it was handled in a thoughtful and appropriate way. | ||
| Yeah, he's right. | ||
| I was wrong. | ||
| I was overconfident in the procedures that the FBI and justice had built over 20 years. | ||
| Again, here's your version, and again, here's the Inspector General. | ||
| My recollection was it was part of a broader mosaic of facts that were laid before the FISA judge to obtain a FISA warrant. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we concluded... | |
| That the Steele reporting played a central and essential role in the decision to seek a FISA order. | ||
| Horowitz says it wasn't part, as you told Brett Baer, it wasn't part of a broader mosaic. | ||
| He said it played an essential role in establishing probable cause. | ||
| In fact, he says, if it hadn't been for the Steele dossier, the FBI probably wouldn't have even submitted a FISA application. | ||
| I'm sure he and I are saying different things. | ||
| There's the issue of how reliable. | ||
| The Steele dossier, in fact, was on January 6, 2017, in the Trump Tower, you brief Donald Trump, president-elect, about the Steele dossier. | ||
| That same month, the FBI talks to Steele's main Russian contact, the main person on whom he based the dossier, who says, according to the IG report, quote, Steele misstated or exaggerated the primary subsource's statements in multiple sections of the reporting. | ||
| Director Comey, not only do you fail to go back to the president-elect or president after January 20th and tell him, oh, you know that report I briefed you on? | ||
| Turns out it's bunk. | ||
| But the FBI goes back and renews its FISA application three more times. | ||
| And by this point, the FBI knows that the steel reporting is not credible. | ||
| Did you know all of this? | ||
| All of what? | ||
| Everything that we're talking about here, did you know that in fact the Steele report was... | ||
| The key for probable cause? | ||
| Did you know that the FBI had talked to the Russian contact and he said what Steele said he had told him was not true? | ||
| Did you know this? | ||
| You're the FBI director. | ||
| First, again, the report will speak for itself. | ||
| I don't believe the FBI concluded that Steele's reporting was bunk after talking to a subsource. | ||
| But no, I didn't. | ||
| As the director, you're not kept informed on the details of an investigation. | ||
| So no, in general, I didn't know what they'd learned from the subsource. | ||
| I didn't know the particular... | ||
| But this isn't some investigation, sir. | ||
| This is an investigation of the campaign of the man who is the president of the United States. | ||
| And there is, I have left for laughs, the worst misconduct. | ||
| In August of 2016, just two weeks into the investigation, the CIA tells the FBI that it actually has a relationship with Carter Page, that when he has these meetings with the Russians, he actually goes back and he tells the CIA about it. | ||
| You never tell the FISA court that. | ||
| And in fact, in 2017, an FBI lawyer doctors a document. | ||
| The CIA said, oh, Carter Page, he's a source. | ||
| And he puts in the application, he's not a source. | ||
| Yeah, I got to take issue with one of the, I'll answer the question, but one of the predications of your question, the inspector general did not find misconduct by any FBI people. | ||
| He found mistakes and negligent and oversight. | ||
| No, no, no, that's not true. | ||
| In the case of Kevin Kleinsmith, he has referred it for a criminal investigation. | ||
| Right, but that's not been resolved. | ||
| This business with the lawyer changing some email to a partner on the team. | ||
| I mean, you make it sound like it's not much. | ||
| No, no, it's very important. | ||
| It's very important. | ||
| I mean, a source to not a source is a big deal. | ||
| Remember how we got here. | ||
| The FBI was accused of criminal misconduct. | ||
| Remember, I was going to jail and lots of other people were going to jail. | ||
| People on this network said it over and over and over again. | ||
| The inspector general did not find misconduct by FBI personnel, did not find political bias, did not find illegal conduct. | ||
| The inspector general found significant mistakes, and that is not something to sneeze at. | ||
| That's really important. | ||
| But the American people, especially your viewers, need to realize they were given false information about the FBI. It's honest, it is not political, it is flawed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's unclear what the motivations were. | |
| On the one hand, gross incompetence, negligence. | ||
| On the other hand, intentionality. | ||
| Gross negligence, or they intended to do it. | ||
| They intended to lie to the FISA court. | ||
| Yeah, he should be in jail. | ||
| He should have been in jail for the last almost decade at this point. | ||
| Don't worry, we're launching investigations. | ||
| We're going to investigate. | ||
| Get to the bottom of this. | ||
| It's really kind of... | ||
| Shocking how easy it is for them. | ||
| They have this great setup where they can admit their crimes and then say oopsie and then it goes away. | ||
| Isn't that amazing? | ||
| Remember they did the same thing for Hillary Clinton with the email servers. | ||
| Did she have classified information? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Did she have it on an unsecured server? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Did she try to delete it when she got caught? | ||
| Try to hide the evidence? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Are we going to punish her? | ||
| No. | ||
| Because we don't think she did it on purpose. | ||
| We think it was an accident. | ||
| Oops, I accidentally have all of this classified information on a private, unsecure server. | ||
| Oh, whoops, when you found out about it, I accidentally went through a whole bunch of steps. | ||
| Got my people to wipe everything with bleach bit and, you know, securely erase everything on the server. | ||
| Oopsies, whoops. | ||
| I didn't intend to break the law, though, so I guess it's fine. | ||
| It's pretty amazing. | ||
| It's pretty great. | ||
| But the mob would still be around in a big force if they'd realized that they could just take this tack. | ||
| Bid rigging for construction in Manhattan? | ||
| Of course we did that, but not on purpose. | ||
| Not because we meant to do bad things, so we're free to leave. | ||
| You know, if you say you're like a, I don't know, whatever, you're in your job, you're a cashier, like every day you might be a little bit off with your totals, right? | ||
| Especially if you're just starting out. | ||
| Might be a few dollars short, maybe a few dollars over. | ||
| If you're always consistently significantly short, then there's an issue. | ||
| When all of the mistakes that are made, all of the little oopsies that they catch, all universally, ubiquitously, just every single one of them benefits what the FBI is trying to do, but that's illegal to do, then it's not an accident. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I mean, it's not that hard to figure out. | ||
| They made all of the perfect mistakes to get exactly what they wanted. | ||
| They just happened to accidentally Make all these little oopsies that just happened to allow them to get the FISA warrant to spy on Trump, to frame him as a foreign agent. | ||
| They accidentally leaked that to the media, so that story was accidentally spread. | ||
| They accidentally didn't tell about the source where they got the Steele dossier from. | ||
| They accidentally forgot that it was the Steele dossier that was the central pillar of the whole thing. | ||
| I mean, at a certain point. | ||
| We're just being played for fools. | ||
| And you can just not listen to the criminals' excuses anymore. | ||
| We need to just stop letting the criminals say oopsie and get away with their crimes. | ||
| I mean, at a certain point. | ||
| Again, in that video alone, I mean, that was five minutes, and it's just how many lives of James Comey were exposed. | ||
| Ten, maybe? | ||
| Like really egregious ones. | ||
| And like the details of all of those we could dive into and spend a long time on. | ||
| The fact that it's like you've got a guy from the Trump campaign meeting some sort of foreign agent. | ||
| Immediately reports it to the CIA. Says, hey, here's what I did. | ||
| They hide that. | ||
| They can then say this guy secretly met with this person in order to get the... | ||
| FISA warrant. | ||
| Because they accidentally forgot to say that actually the guy was reporting what was going on the entire time. | ||
| And oh yeah, by the way, the foreign agent he was meeting with was somebody that the FBI actually specifically said could come into the country even though they weren't allowed to. | ||
| We gave them an exemption and got them a temporary visa so they could come in, meet with the person. | ||
| We set up the meeting, but then we forgot to tell the FISA court that it was our operative they were meeting with and the Trump person had already reported the meeting to the CIA. We forgot all of those things. | ||
| And we filed the meeting as if it was suspicious, even though we knew it wasn't because we wanted to get the FISA warrant that we knew we shouldn't have been able to get because we wanted to spy on the Trump campaign. | ||
| And we thought we were going to get away with all this because we thought our efforts would be successful. | ||
| To see what happens is these people are projecting all of their own activities on the Trump campaign. | ||
| And that really does go a long way to explain their behavior. | ||
| As we've said a million times, how do they think they're going to get away with this? | ||
| Well, they thought for sure if they could just get access to the communications of Trump, then they would find something dependent on him. | ||
| They were convinced. | ||
| You don't take this giant risk. | ||
| You don't create all these fraudulent FISA warrants. | ||
| You don't set up these honeypot operations if you think the guy doesn't have anything on him. | ||
| They would have done it totally differently if they'd known that Trump actually was just totally clean and hadn't made any mistakes. | ||
| Hadn't accepted any of the money that they'd offer him through the guise of a Russian oligarch. | ||
| They thought for sure all we need is to get access to his communications and then we'll find something that we can then spiral out into a corruption charge of some sort. | ||
| They never found anything. | ||
| Then Trump won. | ||
| Then they're screwed, but somehow most of the people involved in this conspiracy are still working. | ||
| Peter Strzok never got fired. | ||
| Lee Page never got fired. | ||
| James Comey eventually got fired, but he's still free, even though clearly, I mean, there's no argument. | ||
| He presided over the complete political warping of the FBI. In really a way that it's never going to recover from. | ||
| It really can't recover from this. | ||
| Unless it's totally wiped out and reformed completely. | ||
| So he should be in jail. | ||
| If we're serious as a country, he should be in jail. | ||
| Global exclusive from Infowars has the headline. | ||
| Inside sources confirm the DOJ has overwhelming evidence that James Comey committed treasonous crimes against the American Republic and will be indicted soon. | ||
| General Flynn did a wide-ranging interview with Alex yesterday. | ||
| He was the former national security advisor. | ||
| He warned that NATO was desperate to stop peace in Ukraine and is using Romania as the detonator to expand the war and stop Trump's international agenda. | ||
| And also, of course, that... | ||
| James Comey can and should be going to prison. | ||
| And man, even just hearing the way they treated Mike Flynn, these people are just evil. | ||
| They're just the embodiment of evil. | ||
| You know the way they got Mike Flynn, and they brag about it. | ||
| I think they showed a clip of the guy talking about it on Alex's show yesterday. | ||
| How, you know, he's the NSA guy. | ||
| And they just go, hey, you know, the FBI, we need to ask you some questions about some stuff. | ||
| And they just go to a meeting that he thinks is just like a normal meeting. | ||
| He has no idea. | ||
| He's under investigation. | ||
| They're actually interrogating him. | ||
| And they're watching every word he says. | ||
| And the second he slips up, they charge him with lying to a federal officer and kick him out. | ||
| And it's just like, imagine if you had to live in a world like that. | ||
| Imagine you have to live in a world where your co-workers come up and say, hey man, I got a few questions for you. | ||
| Do you mind? | ||
| Do you have a second? | ||
| They're all friendly. | ||
| Just like, yeah, real quick. | ||
| No worries. | ||
| We're just going to chat about something real quick. | ||
| And the whole time they're recording you. | ||
| And you have no idea, right? | ||
| So you're just treating it casually. | ||
| They ask you a question. | ||
| You go, yeah, I think that's the case. | ||
| They're like, he's lying. | ||
| That was wrong. | ||
| That was incorrect. | ||
| He's lying to us. | ||
| Arrest him. | ||
| Throw him in prison. | ||
| It reminds me of the Daniel Penny. | ||
| Where Daniel Penny, the guy who choked the guy out, eventually died on the New York subway. | ||
| He had no idea the guy died, right? | ||
| When Daniel Penny last saw him, the guy was alive. | ||
| So he's under the impression that he just stopped a crime. | ||
| The police know that the guy died, have Daniel Penny in the interrogation room, and are getting him to... | ||
| Indict himself by explaining, you know, what happened on the subway car. | ||
| Again, just imagine, imagine yourself in that position. | ||
| Imagine, you know, you're on the street and you see some guy steal a purse from an old woman and start to run. | ||
| And he runs past you and you trip him and get the purse back. | ||
| And the police come up and are like, wow, you know, vigilante here. | ||
| You know, you're a hero. | ||
| You rescued that woman. | ||
| Why don't you come tell us about it? | ||
| We got to file, you know, it was a crime, so we got to file a report. | ||
| And you're sitting there thinking, That you're just, you're the good guy. | ||
| You're actually kind of the victim of the criminal and you're telling the police about it. | ||
| And in reality, the whole time they're, you know, very strategically getting you to admit things they're going to use against you in court because they're trying to send you to jail for life, even though you have no idea. | ||
| You just think you actually are the victim of the crime. | ||
| Again, I get that interrogations, police are allowed to lie. | ||
| They're allowed to do certain psychological tricks. | ||
| They're supposed to be deployed against, like, criminals. | ||
| Not against people who are there under false pretenses. | ||
| And it's just like, that's just who these people are. | ||
| Like, there's something so almost inhuman about it. | ||
| To go up to somebody that you work with, General Mike Flynn, approach as a friend. | ||
| Yeah, we just want to chat, just a few, you know, just have a few questions, want to clear some things up. | ||
| The whole time they just have a gun to your head that you can't even see. | ||
| And that's how they got rid of him. | ||
| So these people need to go to jail. | ||
| I'm just going to say the same thing over and over until it happens. | ||
| They need to go to jail. | ||
| All these people need to be in jail. | ||
| We don't need to investigate them. | ||
| We need to punish them for what we already know they've done. | ||
| We need to just simply not accept the excuse it was an accident. | ||
| Because no other group of people in America gets that leniency. | ||
| It doesn't matter what crime it is. | ||
| And we're talking about high treason. | ||
| We're talking about using the power of the infinitely funded, infinitely powerful, totally unleashed spy state against an American, not just an American person, an American citizen, which would be outrageous enough, but specifically against the frontrunner of the Republican Party because they are Democratic operatives in the FBI at the end of the day. | ||
| So even if you get caught, you know, stealing a candy bar from a store and go, oh, shoot, you know, I just, I need to free my hands up. | ||
| I put it in my pocket. | ||
| I forgot, you know, my bad. | ||
| No, it's not going to fly. | ||
| No, you put the candy bar in your pocket and you walked out. | ||
| Was it an accident? | ||
| Maybe. | ||
| You stole the candy bar. | ||
| And you're still going to get punched for it. | ||
| Somehow, these people commit high treason, blatantly, flagrantly in front of everybody. | ||
| And the people investigating go, but we're pretty sure it was all of these things were an accident. | ||
| Every one of these dozen mistakes that all went the same direction, that all were the perfect mistakes necessary to get exactly what they wanted, those were all just big incompetence, big oopsies. | ||
| We can just not believe that. | ||
| Because it's not true. | ||
| It's as simple as that. | ||
| Jim Jordan has subpoenaed the FBI. Unraveling Biden admin's big tech collusion. | ||
| Jim Jordan demands FBI records on big tech ties, seeking full transparency on censorship efforts. | ||
| House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan subpoenaed the FBI on Monday for seven categories of information, including the Biden administration's collusion with big tech. | ||
| In a letter to the new FBI Director Cash Patel, Jordan states that during the mandate of his predecessor, Christopher Wray, and the former administration, the agency, quote, departed from its core public safety mission. | ||
| And was able to do things while avoiding any real transparency or accountability for its actions. | ||
| According to Jordan, this resulted in deep distrust of the FBI, which can be remedied by shedding light on the agency's involvement in these activities. | ||
| Regarding the government big tech collusion, Jordan recalled that during this previous Congress as well, the committee that he heads undertook an investigation how this was happening and to what extent. | ||
| The results of this oversight so far... | ||
| As well as the discovery in the Missouri v. | ||
| Biden case that continues to be litigated in federal court have revealed the FBI's involvement. | ||
| In order to determine what the agency's exact role was and make sure it doesn't deviate from its mission in a similar way going forward, the committee is now requesting the documents that Christopher Wray, for the most part, had not produced. | ||
| Jordan notes that a subpoena issued in August 2023 sought access to all of FBI's internal documents, communications and notes about any meetings between its representatives and those of big tech and also records related to the censorship of reports about the Hunter Biden laptop scandal. | ||
| What the information has revealed with the investigations have revealed to date is that the FBI was falsely presenting the story as Russian disinformation while in effect pressuring social media companies to censor it. | ||
| Yet another earlier subpoena from February 2023 sent to Meda and Google revealed that the FBI on behalf of a compromised Ukrainian intelligence entity requested and in some cases directed the world's largest social media platforms to censor Americans engaged in constitutionally protected speech online. | ||
| And that's good. | ||
| And, you know, this is where sort of all these topics overlap. | ||
| You've got the corruption of the FBI, but in particular the way the FBI was using its influence and contacts with social media to diminish our First Amendment rights and ability to speak freely on what is, for all intents and purposes, the town square, public town square. | ||
| You've got to get a handle on this quick. | ||
| And we don't have to speculate about where this goes if free speech is not upheld in this country. | ||
| We have Europe to look to as an example. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number three. | ||
| Here's Dreis van Lingenhove talking about a couple criminal charges he's facing for speech in Europe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
up. | |
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I was just interrogated by police for a criminal investigation into a meme that was posted four years ago. | |
| And if you think that's crazy, in two days, I must appear in front of the court of appeals for another case about memes that were posted eight years ago by others in a private group chat. | ||
| I face multiple years in jail for racist memes that I didn't even Ten kilometers from here, in Brussels, migrant gangs shoot and kill people with weapons of war on a daily basis, but literally none of them get arrested or jailed. | ||
| Brought up on charges for a meme posted four years ago. | ||
| And another charge for a meme somebody else posted eight years ago. | ||
| And he could face jail time over this. | ||
| So you have to wonder, the people arguing for hate speech laws, anti-Semitism laws, all these little curtailments of the First Amendment, all these little bites off of the First Amendment, just little all these little bites off of the First Amendment, just little nibbles, Just piece by piece, it being dismantled. | ||
| Do they know where we're headed and they're in favor of it, or are they ignorant to the value of free speech? | ||
| Just like the FBI, at a certain point it doesn't matter. | ||
| What's happening in Europe is what these people want in America. | ||
| And we got more stories about this later. | ||
| Everywhere in Europe is ramping up their censorship across the board in the most egregious ways you can imagine. | ||
| That's what the FBI was involved in here in the United States. | ||
| That's the world they were leading us towards before Trump got into office. | ||
| If you think it's bad now, look at Europe. | ||
| So much worse. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Second hour of American Journal is on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, I think I'm going to go to clip number 15 here. | |
| The mainstream media has put a lot of work into putting people from the federal government in front of the cameras to cry about How terribly sad it is that they're losing their incredibly comfortable job that achieves nothing. | ||
| Now, I don't remember them doing the same thing for the 1,000-plus workers who lost their jobs when Biden canceled the Keystone Pipeline, but that's beside the point. | ||
| They weren't interested in humanizing those people or demonizing that action by the federal government, destroying our ability to... | ||
| You know, have cheap energy and eliminating, again, thousands of well-paying blue-collar jobs. | ||
| That was fine and good because, after all, we're saving the earth here or something, right? | ||
| They had some sort of vague climate conspiracy claim to make. | ||
| So, you know, that was fine. | ||
| That was good. | ||
| When Trump wants to massively downsize the utterly bloated and worthless federal government, they're absolutely outraged. | ||
| They're not publishing that many accounts of the people who are fine with it and actually do their jobs and don't have to worry about it. | ||
| I mean, the whole thing is kind of stupid. | ||
| Like, the outrage, the... | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know. | |
| It's just weird. | ||
| It's just crazy. | ||
| It's like... | ||
| On one hand, you have people who just didn't do anything wrong. | ||
| There's, like, doing their job. | ||
| Building a pipeline, it's necessary to have because we use the energy that it delivers, just having their jobs axed, having entire towns like wiped out, and they shut down coal power plants, just generations tossed to the trash, told to go, you know, learn to code, and doesn't even matter. | ||
| And then you've got these worthless office drones and the FBI or IRS being given these big, you know, sob stories. | ||
| Well, a caller into the Breakfast Club. | ||
| A little bit of a different take. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 15. Here's a federal employee calling into the Trump-hating Breakfast Club radio show. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, Department of Human Services. | |
| Okay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Now, what's up? | ||
| How are you feeling? | ||
| Did you get one of those emails? | ||
| Talk to us. | ||
| Yes, I got the email, and I honestly feel like this is a great opportunity. | ||
| What do we do at the end of the month? | ||
| What are the clients that we have to? | ||
| You know, geared towards, too. | ||
| So, at the end of the day, God forbid anybody make any, and it's a democratic thing. | ||
| It's like, I don't want to get the parties into it, but they don't want to go to work. | ||
| They want to work from home. | ||
| People are not working from home. | ||
| You know, this is what you signed up for. | ||
| If you don't like it, re-sign. | ||
| You know what I'm saying? | ||
| They give you the opportunity to find another job. | ||
| I mean, it's not that hard. | ||
| You're complaining about actually working. | ||
| I don't get it. | ||
| I'm not mad at your perspective. | ||
| That's why I like talking to people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I like talking to people, and I like talking to people who are in it, because everybody sees things a different way. | |
| I haven't heard this perspective. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you feel like there are a lot of people that are not working, that are taking days off? | |
| I guess exactly what you're saying. | ||
| I work from home, and you know what? | ||
| Donald Trump got the gadget idea because Elon Musk, he fired like 80% of the Twitter people or Tesla people for his company because you can buy a gadget that actually shakes up like you're at the desk, but you're really not working because computers, it shuts off if it's non-activity within like five minutes. | ||
| So it requires you to actually work from home. | ||
| But it's gadgets around that, and people are actually buying it and using it. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| It's a federal worker who's just like, yeah, it was fine. | ||
| Yeah, I wrote the letter, and frankly, they should do this because a lot of people that I work with don't actually work. | ||
| They have gadgets to make it look like they're working. | ||
| We're just being screwed over constantly by everybody. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And your policy is just a little red. | |
| I don't know if the crew means to, but they're subtly sabotaging me. | ||
| By showing videos, and I just want to sit here and watch these videos they got. | ||
| Look at that. | ||
| Heard of buffalo, heard of horses. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is just making me even more depressed about the state of the modern world. | |
| What are they doing to me? | ||
| Alright, alright, let's get back into it. | ||
| And in a different life. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Yeah, let's get back into what exactly is happening in the world. | ||
| We just heard that clip of a worker in a federal agency and DHS talking about how so many of her co-workers pretend to work from home but don't actually work. | ||
| This is a great thing that Elon's doing, how she saw it as an opportunity to lay out the five things you did that week. | ||
| And potentially have it, you know, reviewed and get a promotion, you know, prove that she's one of the hard workers that deserves to be there. | ||
| And again, this was something that Elon and Trump talked about yesterday during the cabinet meeting. | ||
| Yeah, if you don't like it, resign, she says. | ||
| Yeah, they're not going to resign. | ||
| But you get it. | ||
| All of these people were offered eight months of paid leave to resign. | ||
| They all refused. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| This is what's so crazy. | ||
| It's like, well, if you want to resign right now, we'll give you eight months of paid leave. | ||
| Tens of thousands of dollars. | ||
| Just yours. | ||
| It's been eight months traveling the world for all we care. | ||
| You'll still be getting a paycheck. | ||
| It's like... | ||
| Have you ever, has anybody ever made an offer to you like that? | ||
| How many people listening to my voice right now have ever been offered eight months full salary to do whatever you want? | ||
| These people refuse that. | ||
| No, I'm not going to accept that. | ||
| I'm not taking Elon's offer. | ||
| And it's like, okay, well then can you write like five bullet points about what you did this week? | ||
| And they're like, what? | ||
| Absolutely not. | ||
| It's just like, okay, so you won't work. | ||
| You won't quit, even when we give you the best offer ever to leave. | ||
| So what do you want? | ||
| They should all be fired with no severance pay. | ||
| That's the only thing they deserve. | ||
| Now Trump has signed an executive order expanding the power of Elon Musk's Doge agency. | ||
| The order calls for the transformation in U.S. spending on contracts, grants, and loans requiring a centralized payment system. | ||
| Donald Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order meant to expand the power of Elon Musk's governmental cost-cutting program, so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The new order calls for a transformation in federal spending on contracts, grants, and loans by requiring agencies to create a centralized system to record and justify payments, which may be made public for transparency and initiative that would be monitored by Musk's team. | ||
| This order commences a transformation in federal spending on contracts, grants, and loans to ensure the government's spending is transparent and government employees are accountable to the American public, it states. | ||
| The order instructs each agency's DOGE team to lead to provide monthly reports on contracting activities, including payments and travel justification, law enforcement, the military, immigration agencies, and national security-related activities are excluded from the new requirements. | ||
| The order is part of a much broader effort by the White House to dramatically reduce the size of the government workforce, which the Trump administration has cast as an impediment to realizing his sprawling agenda. | ||
| Of course it is. | ||
| You know, it's almost fun watching these people try to oppose something that is so imminently necessary and true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know. | |
| It's just everything. | ||
| It's almost exhausting having to go through this over and over again. | ||
| And it's just all you really need to know. | ||
| These people are scum. | ||
| They're just scum. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| That just answers everything you need to know about who these people are and why they say what they say. | ||
| We're just dealing with scum here. | ||
| And that's... | ||
| It shouldn't be a question. | ||
| I don't know if this relates exactly, but this has been stuck in my head for a while. | ||
| I was watching a compilation of Norm MacDonald on Saturday Night Live, the new show, Weekend Update. | ||
| And first of all, if you watch these compilations, he was doing it in the 80s, sort of early 90s, I guess. | ||
| And he's just sort of covering the biggest or most outrageous stories of the week, because the stories are real, and then he makes a joke about them. | ||
| But you see... | ||
| You know, in fast forward and in time-lapse fashion, you see the collapse of American culture in very real time. | ||
| It's just like scandal after scandal. | ||
| It's just like, oh man, they used to be outraged that things like this happened, huh? | ||
| You know, it's all this, you know, whether it's the OJ trial and the murder case there and the collapse of or the weaponization of race relations. | ||
| But one of them is Dr. Kevorkian. | ||
| And I'd always heard that name. | ||
| Everybody knows Dr. Kevorkian. | ||
| He was the assisted suicide guy. | ||
| Right? | ||
| But if you weren't alive at that time, it's pretty crazy. | ||
| I don't know if everybody knows, like, if people remember Dr. Kevorkian. | ||
| His name is just sort of becoming synonymous with this idea of, like, assisted suicide and, like... | ||
| But I never really looked into it, never really realized how insane it truly was. | ||
| There was a dude that drove around with a van and would take old people into his van and kill them. | ||
| He just did this publicly. | ||
| It's kind of like the thing I keep saying, how reporting on the crimes of the globalists is like having a true crime podcast where you know the name and location of the serial killer, but he just keeps killing and nobody does anything about it. | ||
| That was Dr. Kevorkian. | ||
| He literally was just going around killing people. | ||
| He just kept getting away with it. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| And of course you see that and you go, okay, yeah, they were laying the groundwork, you know, seeding the field for what we have now, which is assisted suicide is seen as not just totally acceptable, but necessary and an advancement of civil rights. | ||
| And now the number one cause of death in provinces in Canada are assisted suicide. | ||
| And they're providing it to... | ||
| People who are underage, who are sad, and people who are veterans and homeless and can't afford a place to say, well, we're happy to kill you if that's what you'd like. | ||
| So you can just see all of these, the early manifestation of these things that are just fully entrenched now. | ||
| It's pretty interesting. | ||
| But there's a joke that Dora McDonald makes where he goes, you know, Dr. Kevorkian, more dead patients. | ||
| And it's like, man, this guy's not a good doctor. | ||
| You made some joke of just like, people should stop going to this guy. | ||
| And that's sort of how I feel about the globalists, the deep state, the FBI. It's like, if you think he's a doctor, if you think he's going to help people, and it just happens to be that every single one of his patients dies under his care in his office, it's like, man, this guy's a real bad doctor, isn't he? | ||
| Like, no, he's doing it on purpose. | ||
| He is the angel of death. | ||
| He is a murderer. | ||
| He's going there to kill them. | ||
| And so it's like when we're watching the FBI make these excuses or any of these things, it's like the way the media talks about it, the way people talk about it, it's like people talking about Dr. Kevorkian like he's just a normal doctor whose patients just happen to keep dying. | ||
| If you think the FBI is just genuinely trying to solve crime in the United States and they just whoopsies accidentally keep committing gigantic crimes and letting all the criminals go and covering up for all the big treasonous politicians and doing investigations and then hiding the results of the criminality of the Biden family. | ||
| Okay, if you think that they're genuinely trying to uphold the law, And just not doing a great job, then you're the type of person that thinks Dr. Kevorkian is just a clumsy doctor. | ||
| Just a doctor trying to help people, trying to make people better, and darn it, they just keep dying. | ||
| I don't know if that makes sense to everybody, but that's just how I keep thinking about this. | ||
| So all these people, just the way they say it, the way they phrase it, and it goes for everything, right? | ||
| And you just have to know these people are scum. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They're doing it on purpose. | ||
| It's all by design. | ||
| It's being covered up because the people covering it up are also in on it and know exactly what they're doing, and it's by design. | ||
| So it's very frustrating hearing people talk about this as if it's not on purpose, as if there's some sort of mystery that has to be unraveled. | ||
| It's like, no, they're just criminals being criminals. | ||
| You just need to arrest them, throw them in prison. | ||
| That's all. | ||
| That's all that needs to happen. | ||
| On that note, we have this New York Times article. | ||
| I think we just need to spend some time on it. | ||
| I think we just need to dig down on this. | ||
| Because as we know, New York Times is one of the more sophisticated propaganda outlets. | ||
| One of the still inexplicably well-respected mainstream media. | ||
| Fronts. | ||
| The Department of Education threatens to pull plug on colleges. | ||
| The Department of Education threatens to pull the plug on colleges. | ||
| So, before we've even gotten into the article, we've already had the well poisoned for us. | ||
| They've already established how we should go into this article thinking about the victim-victimizer dichotomy. | ||
| The Department of Education, which remember Trump is running, so it's bad. | ||
| The Department of Education is bad in this instance because they're threatening to pull the plug. | ||
| They're attacking the colleges. | ||
| They're going to pull the plug on them unless they obey. | ||
| Here's what's actually happening. | ||
| We'll just read the article and I'll try to clarify. | ||
| The Department of Education issued a threatening letter this month. | ||
| All right, we've got to do it again. | ||
| We're doing it again from the New York Times this time. | ||
| We're going to do a little editing, little real-time corrections here. | ||
| All you have to do to find the truth in some of these things is erase the words characterizing things, the words changing your emotional response to things. | ||
| So we're just going to erase the word threatening. | ||
| The Department of Education issued a letter this month. | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
| Well, that's not so bad. | ||
| It's better than threatening letter. | ||
| The Department of Education issued a letter this month addressed to all educational institutions that receive federal funds. | ||
| The letter offers an extreme and implausible interpretation. | ||
| Okay, so we just see race extreme and implausible. | ||
| So what we're left with is the letter offers an interpretation of the law governing diversity, equity, and inclusion policy. | ||
| It demands that schools abandon not just affirmative action-like programs that consider the race of individuals, but also policies that are blind to individuals' race as if those policies... | ||
| If those policies were adopted, even in part, to promote racial diversity. | ||
| Thank you, Dan. | ||
| The letter also claims the federal law prohibits schools from teaching or promoting certain ideas about race that the department deems unacceptable. | ||
| The department gives schools until February 28th to comply with this interpretation of the law or risk losing their federal funding, which would endanger the existence of many colleges and universities. | ||
| The threat is a brazen attempt to bully schools into making policy changes the law does not require. | ||
| It's an attempt. | ||
| Yeah, whatever. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| Actually, we don't even need to correct it. | ||
| I don't even care if they mischaracterize how this is being promoted as being described. | ||
| It's very simple. | ||
| If a government receives federal funding, they have to comply with the federal government's laws. | ||
| Now, they claim that the law does not require these policy changes, but in fact it does. | ||
| Because the Supreme Court decided in 2023, in Students for Fair Emission v. | ||
| Harvard, that affirmative action was unconstitutional and should not be allowed in university admissions. | ||
| As they admit in this article. | ||
| Some of the letter's demands, such as getting rid of scholarship programs that consider an applicant's race, are reasonable extensions of the court's decision, but the letter goes beyond those demands, misreading the law in a way that further imperils racial diversity in schools. | ||
| Now, if you remember, it's like so many things about this. | ||
| First of all, affirmative action shouldn't exist in the first place. | ||
| Period. | ||
| Like, it just shouldn't. | ||
| It's not good for anybody. | ||
| I've been over this a million times. | ||
| It's obviously not good for the people it discriminates against, because that's all it is. | ||
| It's just racial discrimination by another name. | ||
| Nobody knows this. | ||
| It's also not good for the people it supposedly helps by taking people who do not qualify for positions and putting them in those positions, do not qualify for certain universities, but letting them go there anyway. | ||
| This is nonsense. | ||
| This is totally absurd. | ||
| And they do it by discriminating against people racially. | ||
| And when the order from the Supreme Court came down and said, You're not allowed to discriminate against people on the basis of their race. | ||
| The university's response to that was to go, oh yeah, no problem. | ||
| No, we're not going to even ask people what their race is. | ||
| What we're going to do instead is we're going to have personal story essays to go along with the application. | ||
| And we'll apply that and include that in our metric as to who we accept into the college or not. | ||
| So in other words, we're not going to explicitly say That we're giving benefits to black and brown people, but we're going to have a personal story, and your score is going to be a little bit higher on that if you happen to tell us in your personal story about the racial discrimination that you've faced. | ||
| In other words, yeah, we're not allowed to do affirmative action, but we're going to do it anyway and wink at each other and pretend that we're not. | ||
| Which it's like, you can't run a country that way. | ||
| That's not totalitarian. | ||
| I wish they'd stop doing that. | ||
| But this is the problem. | ||
| When you have freedom, when you have liberty, when you have an open society, bad people can take advantage of that. | ||
| If you have a top-down control, some sort of communistic pyramid structure where everybody is working at the behest of the party, then yeah, you can control absolutely everything everywhere. | ||
| We don't want our government controlling everything everywhere because we want to be able to trust. | ||
| It's your average citizen to uphold the spirit of the law, not find ways to adhere technically to the letter of the law while violating the spirit completely, but that's where we're at because these people are bad and evil. | ||
| Remember how I started this segment? | ||
| These people are scum. | ||
| These people are just scum, and it's everywhere. | ||
| It's absolutely everywhere. | ||
| So they have, for decades, discriminated against white people and against Asian people in college admissions. | ||
| The Department of Education is saying you cannot get federal funds while discriminating against entire races of people. | ||
| The colleges say, yeah, well, we're still going to do that. | ||
| The Department of Education is like, well, you can, and if you do, we're going to withdraw your funding. | ||
| Now the New York Times and these colleges are portraying this as Department of Education threatens to pull the plug on colleges. | ||
| They're going to shut down universities. | ||
| All that these... | ||
| Universities are saying that this story is saying is that they would rather let the university go down than stop discriminating against white people. | ||
| Because to these people, if the university system can't, if it can't be used to discriminate against white people and spread communist propaganda and, you know, exacerbate racial strife in this country, then it might as well not exist. | ||
| Like, that's what they use it for. | ||
| That's the point of it. | ||
| Sure, they do some education stuff also to justify and check the boxes and make sure that they still get technically rated as a university, but that's not really the point to them. | ||
| The point is to hijack that apparatus and then use it for their own ends, which is the cultural destruction of the United States. | ||
| So if they can't do that, then they might as well be shut down. | ||
| So when the Department of Education is like, you have to stop discriminating against white people, the university is like, we'd rather go down. | ||
| We'd rather... | ||
| Not have federal funds. | ||
| This whole thing... | ||
| What's the... | ||
| There's like a... | ||
| What is the movie or something? | ||
| It's like a guy's got his hand stuck in the jar for the whole episode. | ||
| There's some TV show where a guy's got his hand stuck in the jar for the whole episode. | ||
| And it's because he won't let go of the thing in the jar. | ||
| It's like, just let go of the thing and you can get your hand out. | ||
| But it's like, we're going through all this. | ||
| We're writing articles. | ||
| This is big, you know, political scandal. | ||
| We're going to have to have debates and whatever. | ||
| It's just like, just let go. | ||
| Just let go of the diversity. | ||
| You can, this is all fine. | ||
| You get all the funding you want, all the funding you need. | ||
| You just have to not discriminate against white people. | ||
| Like, it's really not that hard and they just won't do it. | ||
| They won't let go. | ||
| They refuse to release the real point of why they're in the position that they're in to discriminate on the basis of race. | ||
| By the way, I mean, there are stories about this going around, and even just the way they're being reported. | ||
| This headline's somewhat middle of the road, but most headlines about this, from Fortune, here's the story. | ||
| A straight white woman from Ohio is the focal point of a discrimination lawsuit that could reshape the legal landscape. | ||
| Most headlines, you know, the folks is like, you know, this woman is suing over diversity. | ||
| But she's a straight white woman. | ||
| And it's like, do we not even, I mean, even in the way it's being reported, can we not see the problem here? | ||
| That this utterly asinine and ridiculous concept of like white people can't be racist because racism is power plus discrimination or whatever. | ||
| again just retarded communist talking point has been saturated into the otherwise empty minds of the people who run our country it makes no sense It's just utterly vapid. | ||
| This whole argument is just utterly vapid. | ||
| They write this whole article about how terrible it is and how the government is going to shut down these schools because they can't discriminate against white and Asian people anymore. | ||
| The Supreme Court is poised to implement changes to Title VII of the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act that require white, straight, and male plaintiffs to factor in added steps. | ||
| That those in the minority don't. | ||
| This comes after an Ohio Department of Youth Services employee, Marlene Ames, allegedly discriminated, alleged discriminated, I probably mean alleged discrimination, after two LGBTQ plus employees obtained jobs she claimed they did not deserve. | ||
| And the same thing's happening at the NSA. So yeah, you can't, is it, is it Oscar the Grouches I was thinking of? | ||
| No, I'm thinking of something else, but you get the metaphor, right? | ||
| You get the imagery, the analogy. | ||
| They can just stop clinging on to discrimination, and it would be fine. | ||
| They'd get all the money they want. | ||
| They're making this big stink, making this big deal, because basically they can't weasel their way around a Supreme Court decision that said, no, you can't discriminate on the base of race. | ||
| I mean, they even say it in this article, because again, they're not shy about it. | ||
| They're not like good people trying to do the right thing. | ||
| They're scheming little weasels that you give them very direct orders and all that goes on in their mind is like, how do I still be corrupt while technically fulfilling the demands being given to me? | ||
| They say there are many ways to promote diversity and inclusive campuses without relying on race. | ||
| School can expand financial aid for poor students. | ||
| They can eliminate legacy admissions. | ||
| They can favor applicants who parents did not attend college. | ||
| Such policies don't treat anyone differently based on race, but they also serve legitimate goals unrelated to race, such as socioeconomic diversity. | ||
| Translation, they're like, we can still discriminate against white people. | ||
| We just need to not call it that. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| We can still do it. | ||
| We just need to say it's socioeconomic rather than race. | ||
| But it just so happens that all the white people are going to be the higher income and all the non-white people are not going to be higher income. | ||
| So don't worry. | ||
| We're still going to discriminate against white people. | ||
| It's just we're not going to say that's what we're doing. | ||
| So it's fine. | ||
| Kind of like how the FBI is going to spy, you know, going to fabricate evidence to spy on a presidential campaign. | ||
| But that's not what they say they're doing. | ||
| So it's fine. | ||
| Again, the point of all this just throughout it all is just... | ||
| On simple truth, you're bad people with bad intentions doing evil things to hurt other people and negatively affect other people's lives. | ||
| And they just need to stop. | ||
| And we need to stop listening to them try to justify their evil activities. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| We have some breaking news about more experiments going on in Wuhan, China. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So very excited to talk to you about that. | |
| Excited to see what new wondrous crime against humanity and sin against nature they have awaiting us. | ||
| But I want to just finish up talking about discrimination and the way that Donald Trump's team is trying to get universities to just stop blatantly discriminating against the entire class of people in our country. | ||
| And, of course, the effects of this are well known to anybody that cares to pay attention. | ||
| I can't tell you the number of videos I've seen of people who, on paper, would make ideal candidates for Ivy League education. | ||
| Just perfect scores in the SAT, tons of high-level extracurricular activity, work experience, straight A's. | ||
| All the advanced classes, but they're white. | ||
| But they're white, so they'll end up going to state school. | ||
| and they'll be lucky if they ever get hired by anybody considering the fact that over the last couple of years there's been a very deliberate push courtesy of BlackRock and ESG scores to deliberately exclude white people from the corporate executive world as well. | ||
| So just way worse discrimination. | ||
| I'd say worse discrimination even than some things under Jim Crow You could at least still have, you know, black people could still have their own companies under Jim Crow where they could hire who they wanted and they could be all black for that matter. | ||
| Not anymore. | ||
| Diversity is what's necessary. | ||
| That means no white people. | ||
| This New York Times article continues. | ||
| The Department of Education's letter also overreaches in its attempt to police schools' communications of certain ideas about race. | ||
| It cites DEI programs that teach, for example, quote, that certain racial groups bear unique moral burdens that others do not. | ||
| That passage in the letter is brief, and what exactly it prohibits is left vague, but the implication is that the Department interprets Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as restricting what schools may teach students. | ||
| This is wrong and dangerous. | ||
| It's wrong and dangerous for the government to tell schools what they can and can't teach about race. | ||
| It's like they don't actually believe that, obviously. | ||
| I mean, there are like laws being written right now and implemented right now that are the opposite of this, right? | ||
| The equal but opposite, where they're like, you have to teach Holocaust studies at least two years in high school. | ||
| It's like, where's the outrage there? | ||
| Where's the, you can't tell the, you can't compel our speech, how dare you? | ||
| And it's like, who disagrees with this? | ||
| How can you defend programs that teach kids that some races bear unique moral burdens that others do not? | ||
| Again, they keep it vague, which I'm like, anyway. | ||
| They don't teach some races have unique moral burdens. | ||
| They teach white people have all moral burdens for everything, everywhere. | ||
| All the bad things in the world are white people's fault. | ||
| And even the good things white people did was actually just a secret bad thing that was evil. | ||
| And all the bad things that non-white people did were actually just response to white people. | ||
| So it was actually good and totally justified. | ||
| It's like, who's going to defend this? | ||
| Who defends this? | ||
| What type of person? | ||
| Works for the New York Times and sits there going, how do I convince the reading public that it's actually dangerous to not discriminate against people and teach white kids that they're evil and teach black kids that white kids are evil? | ||
| I'm just going to say it again. | ||
| These people are just bad. | ||
| There's bad people who know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They're not interested in any of the things they claim to be interested in. | ||
| Should be obvious from the outset. | ||
| They say the letter's vagueness as to what speech it considers impermissible only worsens the problem because given the threatened sanctions, those unsure of whether they may speak are likely to err on the side of silence. | ||
| Okay, good. | ||
| No, you should. | ||
| You're sitting there thinking, hmm, is the lesson I'm about to teach violate the law that says I shouldn't discriminate against a race of people? | ||
| I think it might. | ||
| I think the lesson I'm about to teach might do that. | ||
| Yeah, you should err on the side of silence. | ||
| You shouldn't risk giving a lecture where you're demonizing an entire race of people. | ||
| It's better to stay silent in that regard. | ||
| Again, it's not difficult. | ||
| This isn't hard. | ||
| This isn't something that you should have to have very stringent orders to dictate what can and can't be spoken. | ||
| It's just like, stop teaching a race of people that they're bad. | ||
| Stop teaching everybody that one race of people is evil. | ||
| And that all the other ones are eternal victims of the bad race. | ||
| Or you don't get federal funding. | ||
| And these people are just like, wow, that's an impossible standard. | ||
| How are we ever supposed to know what does or doesn't violate that restriction? | ||
| And it's just like, just don't do that and it's fine. | ||
| This isn't hard. | ||
| This isn't complicated. | ||
| This isn't a threat to free speech. | ||
| This isn't, you know, the Department of Education shutting down. | ||
| Colleges, this is just, should be normal, and really all of it is just a massive condemnation of our entire system that this is even a question, or that it even exists in the first place. | ||
| Let's go down to clip number 14, because here's Senator Eric Schmidt talking about this civil rights bureaucracy, which has been completely inverted and now does the exact opposite of what it once claimed to do. | ||
| And frankly, the whole Civil Rights Act should be repealed, 100%. | ||
| Whole Civil Rights Act. | ||
| Every act of it, every title of it. | ||
| I mean, they mention like three of the aspects of the Civil Rights Act in here. | ||
| And it's just like clearly none of it is being followed and the stuff that is being followed is damaging to both sides of the argument. | ||
| So just like the whole thing should go away. | ||
| The Civil Rights Act was terrible. | ||
| It's had absolutely terrible outcomes across the board for absolutely everybody. | ||
| We can pull in the video from yesterday of... | ||
| And we talk about it all the time here, but it's nice to see it spread a little bit on X. The fact that in the early 60s and 1950s, the black community was largely indistinguishable from the white community. | ||
| I mean, in terms of all the, all of the outcomes that you would measure the success of a society by, they were on the top of the list, like the most, you know, small owned businesses, best education, they had the highest rate of marriage and the vast they had the highest rate of marriage and the vast majority of people were born to wedded parents. | ||
| All of that has collapsed, all directly as a consequence of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. And, of course, the white community has collapsed because of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because all the organizations that were designed for white people have been gutted and destroyed and inverted. | ||
| And it doesn't even make sense. | ||
| Here's the video. | ||
| Let's go to the video of... | ||
| This is the black community in America before the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Let's watch. | ||
| These people need help from the government. | ||
| You know what these people need is Lyndon Baines Johnson to come in and pay for their unwedded mothers. | ||
| Look at all these poor, helpless, innocent black people. | ||
| They're struggling. | ||
| They're hopeless. | ||
| All they need is the Democrats to come and rescue them from this horror, this squalor they're living in. | ||
| I mean, think about this compared to, you know, the videos that you see out of the black community now. | ||
| I mean, isn't it so much better now? | ||
| Look at these poor oppressed victims in their suits and hats and dresses teaching their kids. | ||
| Nice, well-kept schools. | ||
| It's just horrible. | ||
| I mean, look at the world before the Civil Rights Act. | ||
| Can you imagine going back to this? | ||
| I mean, my God. | ||
| Respectable families living in nice communities, playing with their neighbors, educating their kids. | ||
| I mean, thank God the government came along to set things right. | ||
| Yet another reason why they're trying to destroy history itself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's the thing. | |
| Like, it's an argument still to this day. | ||
| It's a constant thing you hear. | ||
| It's just like, when was America great? | ||
| You tell me when America was great. | ||
| And no matter what you say, it's like, I don't know, the 1950s. | ||
| Oh, okay, so when black people were Jim Crow law restricted. | ||
| It's like, okay, all right. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Earlier than that, then. | ||
| Oh, so when it was even worse. | ||
| And it's just like. | ||
| The 1950s was better for black people, you idiots. | ||
| Listen to any, literally any interview with a black person that isn't, you know, monetarily and politically compelled to, you know, claim that the Civil Rights Act was great. | ||
| Like, ask anybody other than Al Sharpton, who grew up in the 50s and 60s, watch interviews with black people from the 70s, and they're all just like, I don't know what's happening to our community. | ||
| It was so nice when I grew up. | ||
| It was white picket fences and everybody going to church and everybody involved in school. | ||
| And when the school play would happen, the whole neighborhood would be there. | ||
| And there were no out of wedlock births. | ||
| If somebody did get pregnant out of wedlock, you got sent to live with your auntie in the South. | ||
| So you didn't bring shame to your family. | ||
| It was better for black people, too. | ||
| And, you know, it's almost, well, I don't know. | ||
| If you go to public school nowadays, people don't even notice it. | ||
| But it's true. | ||
| Schools are segregated for all intents and purposes. | ||
| It's just you have these two different populations with different needs and different statuses shoehorned in and jammed under the same administration. | ||
| So it's not like segregation even worked. | ||
| I mean, the school I went to, Lamar High School in Houston, Texas, giant inner city school, I was in half... | ||
| Gifted and talented classes, half regular classes, because I didn't feel like trying very hard with math and science. | ||
| And in the gifted and talented classes, there maybe was one, maybe two black people in those classes. | ||
| And in the non-gifted and talented classes, I was the only white guy. | ||
| I was like, okay, you've got these two populations. | ||
| You just call them gifted and talented versus the regular classes. | ||
| What you mean is there's the black population of the school and the white population of the school. | ||
| They're two totally different populations, totally different needs. | ||
| And what ends up happening is the regular classes just get absolutely no support, absolutely no care. | ||
| Like, they just don't care. | ||
| And nobody does any work. | ||
| Everybody cheats. | ||
| The teachers just pass everybody. | ||
| There's literally no work done. | ||
| It's just sort of twiddle your thumbs, fill the time, check the box. | ||
| Okay, they were here in school. | ||
| That must mean they learned something. | ||
| Therefore, they're graduated. | ||
| I mean, it just doesn't help anybody. | ||
| So what are people arguing for? | ||
| What they're arguing for is discrimination against white people. | ||
| Plain and simple. | ||
| Now let's go to clip number 14. This is Senator Eric Schmidt talking about how this entire civil rights bureaucracy has been upended, inverted, flipped on its head, and now serves the exact opposite purpose from what it was intended. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ms. Dillon, I want to ask you a couple questions. | |
| My colleagues on the other side tell us that you're a threat to civil rights. | ||
| The truth is I think you're one of the fiercest advocates of civil rights. | ||
| In a generation, on paper, civil rights are supposed to mean protection from discrimination based on characteristics like race. | ||
| In practice, the entire civil rights bureaucracy as it currently exists is a vehicle for an entrenched new system of discrimination based on race. | ||
| The left is right about one thing in my view. | ||
| There is systemic racism that exists in America today, but it's not Jim Crow or redlining. | ||
| It's the pervasive racial discrimination that exists against Asians, whites, and other disfavored groups that take place now on college campuses, in the boardrooms of Fortune 500 companies, even in the halls of our own government. | ||
| It goes by a bunch of different names, principally equity or DEI or CRT. You can go on and on. | ||
| But whatever you want to call it, it's wrong. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| It's wrong for a bunch of different reasons. | ||
| And of course, I mean, we're not even... | ||
| I mean, God, the number of angles you can go with this. | ||
| For example, I am a minority in Texas. | ||
| There are more Latino, Hispanic people in Texas than white people. | ||
| Does that mean all of the affirmative action benefits suddenly shift over to white people? | ||
| And now we're given preferred treatment? | ||
| Of course not. | ||
| Of course not. | ||
| Asian people in this country... | ||
| Our minorities arrive, in many cases, from deplorable conditions, especially before the rise of Asia over the last several decades. | ||
| Asian people arrived in this country from these communist nations where the average income was a dollar a year or whatever. | ||
| No benefits, no racial privilege, as they would put it, in this country. | ||
| And yet, they do really well. | ||
| And yet, their kids get into... | ||
| Good colleges. | ||
| They do well in school. | ||
| And so now they're being discriminated against. | ||
| So it's not even about racial discrimination anyway. | ||
| It's about just discriminating against people who achieve things is what it seems like at the end of the day. | ||
| It seems like what it comes to. | ||
| It's not about making up for historical injustices. | ||
| It's not about any of that stuff. | ||
| These are just bad people with bad intentions using the empathy and sympathy of white people. | ||
| To rob from them, essentially. | ||
| And it's even more absurd when you really think about it because the fact that Asians do so well, they're not considered minorities anymore. | ||
| Wrap your mind around that concept for a second. | ||
| One of the smallest racial groups in the country is not a minority because they succeed so much. | ||
| This is nonsense. | ||
| But then think about the fact that The fact that a tiny minority group like Asians in this country can succeed so wildly sort of proves that discrimination isn't actually a barrier to anything ever in this country. | ||
| Sort of disproves the whole underlying concept behind affirmative action and diversity, equity, and inclusion when you have Asians massively succeeding in this country despite also being discriminated against by affirmative action. | ||
| This really is why I struggled to talk about any of this stuff because it's like the layers and the various angles of absurdity you have to deal with are truly infinite. | ||
| So I don't get how anybody can fall for this stuff when it's like... | ||
| And maybe somebody says something and it sounds true, but there's like one aspect of it that you can point out and you go, ah, but isn't this actually this? | ||
| And you go, oh, wow, that does prove that wrong. | ||
| I didn't realize that. | ||
| Now that I know this aspect is false, I get how this argument is wrong. | ||
| This is like the foundation is wrong, the underlying premise is wrong, the conclusion is wrong, the outcome is wrong. | ||
| It's like no part of it is even remotely accurate or true or good in any possible reading. | ||
| How are we even arguing this still? | ||
| We're going to go to this video. | ||
| This came out a few days ago. | ||
| A teen genius with a 4.4 GPA, a 1590 SAT score, it's out of 1600, who was hired straight out of high school by Google for a PhD-level software engineering position, was rejected by 16 out of 18 colleges he applied to, including five University of California schools. | ||
| You cannot achieve more than this kid in high school. | ||
| You cannot be a better applicant for schools, and yet he's rejected. | ||
| So just extrapolate that 10 million times across 10 million high schoolers. | ||
| And it's unimaginable the damage this has done to our country. | ||
| The most qualified people are deliberately discriminated against and not given the boost, the leg up, the path to success that they need. | ||
| To actually contribute to our country and maximize their potential. | ||
| They are instead cut out at the knees and some less hardworking, less capable, less genius person gets their place instead. | ||
| And then, of course, they can't do it so well, so you have to lower the standards across the board and you just get this feedback loop that ends with where we are now, which is a country on the verge of total and absolute collapse with planes running into each other on the tarmac. | ||
| Because everybody's a retard. | ||
| Let's go to clip 21 here. | ||
| This is the results of the Civil Rights Act and affirmative action. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Palo Alto Teen hired straight out of high school by Google as a PhD-level software engineer, yet he was rejected by most colleges he applied to, including five UC campuses, even with a 4.4 GPA and a 1590 out of 1600 on the SATs. | |
| Some of them were certainly expected, you know, Stanford, MIT, you know, it is what it is, right? | ||
| But yeah, for some of them, like Cal Poly, some of the state schools, I really thought, you know, I had a good chance. | ||
| His name, Stanley Jong, and he and his father just filed a lawsuit against the University of California and the U.S. Department of Education. | ||
| The Jongs allege that UC is engaging in racial discrimination in emissions despite the law banning the use of race in the process. | ||
| I want to show the UC statement to us when we inquire. | ||
| They call these lawsuits meritless and they also say, "The UC undergraduate admissions application collects students' race and ethnicity for statistical purposes only. | ||
| The information is not shared with application reviewers and is not used for admission." Some people might look at this and say, "Look, Stanley is working at Google, making good money with a dream job that top university graduates aspire to. | ||
| Why does he want to be a part of this? | ||
| And for you, some critics might be, why are you not letting this go? | ||
| There's a bigger story here. | ||
| First of all, I think the story is bigger than Stanley himself and bigger than myself, for sure. | ||
| And what we're trying to get out of this is a fair treatment of Asian applicants going forward, including my other kids and my future grandkids. | ||
| So there you go again. | ||
| Everything about that story destroys everything. | ||
| It's not actually to help minorities. | ||
| It's to help minorities that aren't doing well, but it doesn't actually help them. | ||
| It actually discriminates against people. | ||
| It's just all inverted and completely. | ||
| Backwards. | ||
| Meanwhile, we have this. | ||
| Republicans introduced bill to defund liberal propaganda national public radio. | ||
| Two Republicans, one in the Senate and one in the House, have introduced a new bill that would accomplish this task. | ||
| And in our current environment of cutting waste, fraud and abuse, the time is right to strike. | ||
| Even liberal law professor Jonathan Turley recently said it was time to end NPR's taxpayer-funded gravy train. | ||
| The GOP needs to get this done. | ||
| There's another thing I'm not in favor of, to be honest with you. | ||
| I mean, NPR is just awful. | ||
| Trust me, there's no shortage of condemnation here for the national public radio. | ||
| At the same time, Can we not, as the United States, can our government not handle having a national public radio? | ||
| Wouldn't it be nice? | ||
| Isn't the idea nice to have a nationally funded public radio that can just, doesn't have to make money, doesn't have to pursue profit, doesn't have to try to get the biggest, craziest headlines just to drive traffic, that it can just tell the truth with no other input, no other influence on it? | ||
| So, I mean, but the problem is that if you don't police it for liberal bias, then it will inevitably be infiltrated and warped and bent to their ends. | ||
| So, you know, there could be another method to go after this. | ||
| But this is the problem with conservatives never wanting to actually engage with the functions of government. | ||
| They see something's gone liberal and they're just like, ah, just cut it. | ||
| Let's just get rid of it. | ||
| Like, why don't we take it over? | ||
| Why don't you pass a bill that says, like, the Republicans get to nominate the leader of NPR and then the Democrats get to do it for the next four years or whatever. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| There's got to be some way that you can clamp down on the egregious and just, like, outrageous liberal bias from NPR. Because it is egregious and outrageous. | ||
| And I'm sure they would go the same way that... | ||
| Universities are going with DEI where you tell them, hey, maybe clamp down on the being complete abject propagandists for communism. | ||
| And they'd be like, we're being shut down. | ||
| They're shutting us down completely. | ||
| It's like, no, all we said is you have to stop telling lies to benefit the Democrats. | ||
| And they're like, yep, we're shutting down. | ||
| We're never going to do that, so I guess we're shutting down. | ||
| That's probably what would happen. | ||
| But just like all this stuff, I would like to see... | ||
| Republicans actually engage with the government and actually have some of these programs benefit us and our beliefs and the American people rather than being used as a weapon against the American people. | ||
| And I don't know what it's going to take for Republicans to get over the psyop of small government. | ||
| Small government's good in theory. | ||
| In practice, you're tying both hands behind your back. | ||
| We'll have a lot to cover in the third hour of today's show. | ||
| And this is just in from the Telegraph. | ||
| Wuhan COVID Lab planning ominous new bat experiments. | ||
| Chinese scientists are planning ominous experiments similar to those that could have triggered the COVID pandemic, experts have warned. | ||
| The Wuhan Institute of Virology published new research this month announcing it had found a bat coronavirus that can enter human cells similar to a COVID-19 infection. | ||
| Oh, how exciting. | ||
| The paper concludes, With calls for further investigation into strains that have more infectious spike proteins, as well as testing in human transgenic mice. | ||
| The first known COVID cases emerged just eight miles from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was known to be collecting and manipulating coronaviruses. | ||
| The Institute was stripped of U.S. funding for carrying out dangerous experiments ahead of the outbreak, and the U.S. Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic concluded in December that the disease most likely leaked from the Wuhan lab. | ||
| Experts warned that the latest experiments are being carried out below recommended biosafety levels and that future proposals were alarmingly similar to those that could have sparked the pandemic. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| I don't know why we have to pretend anymore. | ||
| It would be easy, you know, instead of like five paragraphs to say this, you can just say, the lab that created coronavirus is doing it again. | ||
| That's actually the way that this should be talked about. | ||
| They're doing it again. | ||
| They've not corrected any of their biosafety violations that potentially led to COVID if you believe it was an accidental release, which I don't. | ||
| But, hey, they could be laying the groundwork for the public story that, hey, maybe it'll happen again and it'll be an accident again. | ||
| And again, we'll be plunged into worldwide lockdown. | ||
| And again, they'll... | ||
| Pretend it came from nature. | ||
| I mean, is it really so hard to believe that like in a year from now, it's like, what are the odds? | ||
| The same wet market that coronavirus came out of has birthed coronavirus 2.0. | ||
| It's a new one and it comes from hedgehogs this time. | ||
| that dangerous wet market right next to the Institute of Virology. | ||
| I think we should bomb it. | ||
| I think we should bomb the Wuhan Institute of Virology. | ||
| That's my take on it. | ||
| Before the pandemic, the Wuhan Institute of Virology had collected more than 220 SARS-related coronaviruses, at least 100 of which were never made public. | ||
| Members of staff were also photographed wearing inadequate levels of personal protective equipment while handling bats. | ||
| U.S. intelligence also discovered that three researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology had sought treatment at a hospital after falling ill with COVID-like symptoms in November of 2019. | ||
| The new virus that's been found is called HKU5-CoV-2, and it's a new member of the coronavirus family, which can infect cells by targeting the human ACE2 receptor similar to COVID-19. | ||
| It belongs to a different group of coronaviruses than COVID-19 called MIRBicoviruses, which includes MERS, the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, and it cannot currently spread as well as COVID-19. | ||
| Oh, but they're working on that. | ||
| They're going to work on that extra hard. | ||
| Right now, there's no known human cases, no proof of human transmission, but I say give them six months. | ||
| I think they can do it. | ||
| There are fears that the Wuhan Institute of Virology may carry out controversial experiments to increase infectivity of the new virus known as gain-of-function work. | ||
| It's also possible that infecting humanized mice may allow the virus to evolve naturally in the lab and become more dangerous in a process known as passaging. | ||
| By the way, one of the paper's authors is Dr. Xi Jinli, who was dubbed Batwoman for her work collecting and manipulating bat viruses before the pandemic, who initially feared the virus had leaked from her lab. | ||
| So it's literally the same person responsible for COVID doing exactly the same thing in exactly the same lab with a brand new and potentially more dangerous virus. | ||
| And just why? | ||
| Just why? | ||
| Why? | ||
| Why? | ||
| Why are they doing it? | ||
| What are they doing? | ||
| Like, what could be the purpose of this? | ||
| What innocent excuse is there for doing what they're doing? | ||
| I genuinely don't have a reason. | ||
| What could it be? | ||
| I mean, we don't know. | ||
| They're just weaponizing viruses. | ||
| They're just making viruses infectious to humans. | ||
| Why though? | ||
| So we'll have to talk about in this last hour of the show. | ||
| I think I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls. | ||
| I think that's what I'm going to do because I've got a pre-recorded interview with Brandon Morello, but it's up on band.video. | ||
| It's actually on the Real Alex Jones Twitter account. | ||
| So if you want to find that, you can go watch that now. | ||
| Now, I'm going to, instead of playing that, go to your phone calls and continue to talk about these stories, including transgender terrorism, war with Iran, the totalitarian crackdown of free speech in the EU. | ||
| As well as visiting, hopefully for the last time, the insanity of the Canadian residential school hoax. | ||
| we're going to put a little bow on this So all of that and more, but your phone calls as well. | ||
| The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| First of all, on COVID note, since they're still doing these experiments with, as far as I can tell, just absolutely no valid reason to do it. | ||
| Maybe you can call in and tell me what the hell they're doing this for. | ||
| Wuhan COVID Lab, the same woman who apparently is behind COVID, Zingali. | ||
| Is doing the same type of experiments with the same type of viruses in the same lab who still hasn't fixed its safety issues yet. | ||
| And it's just like, but why though? | ||
| But why are they doing it? | ||
| It's like the COVID pitch meeting skit, right? | ||
| It's like, well, we got to make sure to be ready in case something like that happens. | ||
| It's like... | ||
| You're the ones doing it. | ||
| Like, what are you talking? | ||
| It's like there's a volcano above a city and there's scientists just being like, yeah, we're going to throw TNT into the volcano. | ||
| See what happens. | ||
| Like, okay, well, one thing that might happen is it might erupt and kill everybody in town. | ||
| And they're like, yeah, that's a risk. | ||
| Okay, but what's the benefit? | ||
| And they're like, we got to study volcanoes. | ||
| We're going to learn more about how volcanoes work. | ||
| Like, but why? | ||
| But what is the purpose? | ||
| Well, why are you doing this? | ||
| Why are you engaged in this hugely dangerous, and this analogy isn't even good, because the volcano I'm talking about could cover the Earth, could kill everybody on Earth. | ||
| So, that's what you're dealing with, and you're talking about bio-enhancing viruses, unknown, mysterious, newly discovered viruses. | ||
| Why are they doing it? | ||
| It's just, what are we doing here? | ||
| Crazy. | ||
| Speaking of COVID, from Daily Mail, mom of two, Ms. Burnett, 34, undergoes a dozen surgeries to replace her dying bones, which doctors link to the COVID vaccine. | ||
| Brittany Burnett is used to caring for others as the director of a nursing home until she developed a condition that caused her bones to rot after taking the COVID shot. | ||
| Ms. Burnett, 34, was working at a nursing home in her native Tennessee when the COVID pandemic hit in 2020. She watched patients die alone and missed her son's birthday out of fear of becoming infected and bringing the virus home with her. | ||
| In January 2021, COVID vaccines became available, and feeling a sense of duty to protect her patients, she took the Pfizer vaccine. | ||
| She experienced no immediate side effects, but in July 2021, Ms. Burnett developed unbearable pain in both her hips. | ||
| She was told she had arthritis at 31 years old and had to use a wheelchair when the pain made it too hard to walk. | ||
| Believing her pain was something else, another doctor ordered an MRI, which revealed Ms. Burnett's hip bones were literally rotting. | ||
| And she underwent her first hip replacement in December 2021. The second followed a few months later in 2022. However, her hips were just the beginning. | ||
| Over the next nearly four years and still ongoing today, Ms. Burnett would undergo surgeries on both shoulders and knees. | ||
| Three surgeries on her elbow, one on her left foot, and she's scheduled to have another procedure on her right foot next week. | ||
| About a year after her ordeal began, one of her doctors attributed her complications to her bout of COVID in late November 2020 and the subsequent vaccines. | ||
| So this poor woman, her bones are literally rotting in her body, and she's having to systematically, one by one, go in and have her bones surgically replaced. | ||
| Because she got the vaccine. | ||
| It's like a body horror movie. | ||
| It's like some sort of creepy horror movie. | ||
| I mean, seriously. | ||
| Disgusting. | ||
| And of course, the people that did it to her are going to get away with it scot-free. | ||
| And I imagine it does have to do with the vaccine, considering the fact that all the places mentioned so far are places with a lot of Cartilage. | ||
| Like, it's not the bones itself. | ||
| It's the material around the bones that is probably being affected here. | ||
| But, God, the pictures are gruesome, too. | ||
| I don't even want to show those. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Having her bones replaced because she wanted to get a vaccine. | ||
| Just horrifying. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just absolutely horrifying. | |
| Meanwhile, we have this from justthenews.com. | ||
| 150 bipartisan lawmakers join a resolution supporting Iranian people's fight for regime change. | ||
| Oh, see, they just want democracy. | ||
| Oh, they're just demanding democracy. | ||
| And you know what? | ||
| I bet if we go into Iran and take out their president, I bet the positive effects will reverberate all throughout the region, right? | ||
| Somebody get Netanyahu on the globe. | ||
| I bet he can tell us all about... | ||
| What a brilliant and successful mission it would be to free the people of Iran from their tyrannical government. | ||
| I'm sure that's what's happening, right? | ||
| 150 bipartisan lawmakers should be removed from their office by force for even approaching the idea that we should get involved in yet another Middle East war against Israel's enemies on the Outrageous and dubious, hysterical and ridiculous claims that it's because they want us to. | ||
| No, it's because Iran just really wants us to invade and slaughter a million of their people and collapse their entire country and enslave them to the dollar. | ||
| That's what they really want. | ||
| They're sick of having to cover their hair, so now they want America to come in. | ||
| And stomp all of their faces into the dirt. | ||
| That's what they desperately want. | ||
| Where's that Epstein list? | ||
| That's what I want to know. | ||
| And how many of these 150 bipartisan legislatures are on it. | ||
| Meanwhile, from Postmillennial, Gen Z reveals antidepressants are damaging their sex lives. | ||
| Young adults are increasingly speaking out about the long-term sexual side effects of antidepressants, with some reporting that medications have permanently altered their ability to experience pleasure. | ||
| In an interview with the New York Post, 27-year-old commercial truck driver Nick shared his experience after being prescribed a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, SSRI, for moderate anxiety and depression. | ||
| After six years on the medication, he stopped taking it and soon noticed a loss of sensation in his genitals. | ||
| Over several weeks, the numbness worsened and his sex drive never returned to its previous levels. | ||
| That region feels as sensitive as the skin on the back of my elbow does, says Nick, who would ultimately discover he suffers from post-SSRI sexual dysfunction. | ||
| Antidepressants are known to cause sexual dysfunction in some cases, with side effects that can persist for years after stopping the medication. | ||
| The National Institute of Health's medical terminology database used in the U.S. healthcare system recognizes PSSD as a disorder, describing it as persistent sexual side effects, such as genital numbness and loss of libido that can last for years, Several medical agencies have acknowledged the condition and commonly prescribed antidepressants like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil include warnings about potential sexual dysfunction as a side effect. | ||
| I mean, I don't even know. | ||
| I don't even know what to do at this point anymore. | ||
| It's like SSRIs don't work the way that they're supposed to. | ||
| Like, it's been admitted. | ||
| We covered the story earlier this week because everybody was outraged that RFK was talking about SSRI's association with mass murderers. | ||
| But it turns out that's just one of the myriad of just horrifying side effects that this mysterious drug does. | ||
| They don't know how it works. | ||
| They don't know what the function is that actually causes it to change the... | ||
| The chemicals in your head, right? | ||
| They're like, we think depression is caused by a lack of serotonin. | ||
| And then they do a bunch of studies. | ||
| Turns out that's not true. | ||
| But they're still just prescribing SSRIs to like 50% of young women in the United States. | ||
| It destroys your sex drive. | ||
| It chemically alters your brain in ways they don't even understand. | ||
| It causes homicidal and suicidal thoughts. | ||
| And it basically just makes you a zombie. | ||
| It's basically a chemical lobotomy that, again, they're prescribing to like the vast majority of... | ||
| People, and of course it's a compounding effect and it's a feedback loop where you've got all these kids on SSRIs. | ||
| They don't feel anything, right? | ||
| So they don't have friend groups. | ||
| They don't, you know, interact with each other. | ||
| And I saw an interesting, you know, theory because basically all around the world you're having a split in young people where boys are becoming slightly more right-wing. | ||
| It's not very dramatic in boys, but boys are becoming more right-wing. | ||
| Girls are becoming massively more left-wing. | ||
| They're separating, but the rate at which they're separating, the girls are getting way more left-wing, and the boys are getting just a little bit more right-wing. | ||
| Regardless, they're both diverting. | ||
| And somebody on X pointed out, this is probably at least, maybe not caused by, but definitely exacerbated by the fact that they're not interacting with each other anymore. | ||
| And they're not de-radicalizing each other, is how this poster put it. | ||
| I think there's absolutely something to that. | ||
| I think that's a brilliant observation. | ||
| That you've got this designed artificial division between girls and boys where girls are being raised and being told that men are evil and the transgenderism stuff. | ||
| It's all just awful. | ||
| And of course, the racial aspect gets into this too because most of this brainwashing is being targeted at white people and white kids in particular. | ||
| And white kids are probably the race most likely to Like, internalize it and listen to it and, like, try to do it. | ||
| So, there's a whole other aspect of that, but we don't even need to get into that right now. | ||
| Regardless, I think there's something to that, that if you have kids hanging out, I'm thinking back to, like, hanging out with people in high school, and, you know, we just always had big friend groups. | ||
| That was usually, like, half boys and half girls. | ||
| We just, like, go hang out at a park or whatever. | ||
| And, you know, there wasn't a lot of, like, political talk, which I think is another... | ||
| Change, obviously, between generations. | ||
| Growing up, for me, not a lot of people really cared that much about politics. | ||
| Now it's invasive everywhere. | ||
| Everybody's an extremist in one way or another. | ||
| But it's this type of thing where as you're talking, as you're discussing things, as you're forming your worldview as a kid, if you're a girl and you're saying things that are far left, you're probably going to have a boy sneer at you, scoff at you. | ||
| Yeah, whatever. | ||
| You're being a pussy. | ||
| You know, you just go, you know, these people should just man up or whatever. | ||
| And maybe it doesn't convince you, but it'll have some sort of impact on your socialization. | ||
| And you might go, well, okay, apparently guys aren't going to like me if I believe this. | ||
| Maybe I'll tamp down that a little bit. | ||
| Maybe they have a point. | ||
| Same for guys too, right? | ||
| They might have some, you know, hardcore belief and they see that girls sort of give them the stink face look. | ||
| When they say it, they go, okay, that did make me popular with the girls. | ||
| Maybe I shouldn't say that type of thing. | ||
| They just sort of conform to each other, and you end up dampening the extremism on either side by the interaction. | ||
| Well, now, by force because of COVID, but also just by inclination because of the propaganda brainwashing they're under. | ||
| They don't really hang out anymore. | ||
| They kind of hate each other. | ||
| The boys are demonized. | ||
| Girls are turned into, you know, insufferable know-it-alls. | ||
| And I think that is mostly, well, the boys are insufferable know-it-alls too when they go left. | ||
| Just look at the Kamala propagandists and their debating style. | ||
| It's just, ugh. | ||
| And that's another thing. | ||
| It's like, I'm not an advocate for bullying, but there's this style of, like, boy now. | ||
| You know, there's a style of young man. | ||
| It's like the Harry Sisson or that other little queer, I can't remember his name, but, you know, they have this just like, okay, well, let me lay this down for you in a few different ways, okay? | ||
| Clearly you can't understand what I'm saying right now. | ||
| And it's like, it's like gay Ben Shapiro. | ||
| And that works on the internet. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ben Shapiro is gay. | |
| Ben Shapiro is gay. | ||
| This is new to me. | ||
| You can talk like that on the internet. | ||
| You can act like a snarky bitch on the internet. | ||
| And the other snarky bitches will celebrate you and act like you're winning the argument or whatever. | ||
| And if you try that in a group of a bunch of high schoolers in person, they're just going to laugh at you. | ||
| Like, you're going to stop talking like that. | ||
| And no one's going to think you won the argument. | ||
| Because you, you know... | ||
| I don't even know how to describe the style of talking. | ||
| How would y'all describe it? | ||
| It's like this know-it-all... | ||
| Again, it's been going on forever. | ||
| It's the same type of thing that happened to kids who watched the Disney Channel growing up. | ||
| I don't know if it's still the same, but definitely when I was growing up, it was like anybody who had a younger sister that watched the Disney Channel a lot, that sister was just insufferable. | ||
| Because if you watch the Disney Channel, every single show has the know-it-all snarky kid that knows more than the parents and more than all the adults and is constantly condescending. | ||
| So they think that's what winning an argument is. | ||
| They think the bitchier I can be, that means I win. | ||
| That means I'm the smartest, actually. | ||
| The more condescending, the more insufferable I can be, the cooler I am. | ||
| So it's that sort of style of talking that is pervasive right now. | ||
| And again, it's because these kids live on the internet. | ||
| They don't get any actual real-world feedback. | ||
| I'm telling you, when I was growing up, anybody tried to talk to me like these kids? | ||
| Talk to like adults? | ||
| These Harry Sisson types? | ||
| Who's the other one? | ||
| Who's the blonde one? | ||
| He's the worst. | ||
| The worst, dude. | ||
| And again, it's like, it just wouldn't... | ||
| Dean Withers. | ||
| That's the one. | ||
| Dean. | ||
| His name's Dean. | ||
| Yeah, Dean. | ||
| Old Dean over there. | ||
| Yeah, it's just like... | ||
| He only thinks it's cool to talk like that because he's in a digital echo chamber with a bunch of other know-it-all retards. | ||
| So that's a phenomenon. | ||
| That's the phenomenon that we're dealing with here. | ||
| People that are both retarded and act like know-it-alls. | ||
| And that really is the worst combination. | ||
| I'm sort of fine with either. | ||
| Somebody can be a know-it-all and it's fine. | ||
| And people can be retards, and that's fine. | ||
| But it's when you've got these very stupid, uninformed children. | ||
| They're children who think they know more than you and condescend to you. | ||
| We've got to do something about that. | ||
| That something is get them off the internet and experiencing the real world in person with people who they're forced to hang out with by dint of proximity. | ||
| Right, because that's the other thing. | ||
| It doesn't work if you have a whole bunch of these guys in the same room. | ||
| They all just feed off each other's energy and just get worse and worse. | ||
| it's the fact that like you go to high school you're yeah the bro whisperer hilarious is Yeah, dude. | ||
| It's just, you know, what you want is kids having to go to high school. | ||
| With a bunch of people from their neighborhood, they can't control what they believe. | ||
| And then this whole just like, okay, I'm going to try to break this thing down for you. | ||
| Clearly, you can't understand. | ||
| You're not informed. | ||
| You haven't done the research that I've done. | ||
| And it's just like, yo, shut up, dude. | ||
| And then they don't talk like that anymore. | ||
| And then we don't have to listen to them. | ||
| And that's the solution. | ||
| Bullying. | ||
| I think it's bullying. | ||
| Do we have any phone calls? | ||
| Let's put the call screen up and we'll go to some phone calls here. | ||
| But in the next segment, I am going to get into how I'm going to sort of revisit and expand a little bit on the speech control in the UK. | ||
| In the meantime, you know, just the last few minutes here, or maybe we'll just go out to call. | ||
| See, here they are. | ||
| Let's go to Joshua in Georgia, who's called in first. | ||
| Go ahead, Joshua. | ||
| You're on the air on line one. | ||
| Go ahead, Joshua. | ||
| Good morning, Emperor Smith. | ||
| Good morning, my dutiful subject. | ||
| What's on the agenda today, sir? | ||
| What's Trump going to do now because of you? | ||
| Good question. | ||
| I haven't proposed any policy today, I don't think. | ||
| Maybe I'll beat up Dean Withers. | ||
| That's my policy. | ||
| Beating up, punching Dean Withers in the mouth. | ||
| Just kidding. | ||
| Politically. | ||
| Politically in Minecraft. | ||
| Sorry, sorry. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| Right, right, right, right. | ||
| Real quick, based on what you just said, see if your crew can find that little cartoon. | ||
| It's titled, Stephen forgets he's not on the internet. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Okay, so I called in with a suggestion, but after listening to the COVID thing, I forgot about some I've been wanting to talk about for years. | ||
| But first, the little suggestion for your intro. | ||
| Alex has the count up of the golden age. | ||
| How about having the deck clock and then have the crew zoom in on the golden bar? | ||
| And then have a graphic of how much saved in the last 24 hours, how much saved in the last week, etc. | ||
| That's a good idea. | ||
| We could actually have a couple different tickers. | ||
| We could have, like, the debt clock. | ||
| We could also have, like, the deportation numbers. | ||
| Like, we should have that scrolling across the screen. | ||
| That's not a bad idea. | ||
| Oh, and speaking of deportation numbers, everybody's all like, how about we have somebody with a clicker down there at the southern border monitoring everybody crossing back over to Mexico with their truck full of their goods? | ||
| Yeah, there has been. | ||
| You know, in the first, like, week or so, there was a lot of those stories coming out. | ||
| I haven't seen much of them recently, but, you know, definitely the Trump administration is pursuing the self-deportation route these days. | ||
| Yeah, that's a good idea. | ||
| Okay, but, okay, now what I thought of, you know, here's a serious deal. | ||
| I called in about four years ago when COVID first hit. | ||
| There was a French scientist who looked into the vaccines and saw that they were off. | ||
| The main ingredient was graphene oxide, which is smart dust, which is what nanotech builds itself on. | ||
| And he said the cure for that, what breaks it down is glutathione, which is a natural hormone or whatever in the body that you only get when you're playing outside in the sun, which is one reason for the lockdown. | ||
| But you can get it. | ||
| I looked it up as soon as I heard that. | ||
| And it's all over the place as a supplement. | ||
| So, like, have a... | ||
| A COVID shot detox, which includes glutathione. | ||
| That's something for Alex to look at. | ||
| That would be a serious, serious help. | ||
| I mean, I heard about, you know, I saw the story about that woman. | ||
| All her joints are just turning to dust, almost like, you know, white phosphorus was put in. | ||
| But, you know, glutathione will at least take out the graphene oxide, which is making the little circus, which is why I think all these... | ||
| People who have all their 10,000 boosters, I think that's why their brains are melting down. | ||
| It's physiological, not necessarily psychological, because the shots break through the blood-brain barrier. | ||
| They're meant to mess you up. | ||
| And I think that psychologically, everybody who took all the... | ||
| And I've got a cousin who's been multiple-jabbed, and he is insane now. | ||
| So maybe that's an idea. | ||
| Put out a big vax detox or something. | ||
| Yeah, that's not a bad idea. | ||
| And of course, it just reminds me of the SSRI stuff. | ||
| It's sort of across the board. | ||
| Messing with your brain with no knowledge of how it's going to affect you. | ||
| And it's just so sick. | ||
| One thing of long COVID, it's like... | ||
| People for, like, years had just, like, extreme brain fog. | ||
| And she's like, can you imagine a more torturous thing to put someone through than just essentially, like, lowering their IQ by 20 points? | ||
| And just, like, they know they're smarter than they're feeling. | ||
| They know that before they could have figured this out. | ||
| They could have, you know, understood this, but now they can't. | ||
| And that's basically what happened worldwide, of course. | ||
| It could even affect you if you're not jabbed because of the vaccine shedding. | ||
| More calls on the other side. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
| We're going to go out to your phone calls here in this final segment. | ||
| We've got some pretty crazy stories. | ||
| I think people are starting to realize this NSA chat log story has made more people aware of exactly what's going on. | ||
| But you can tell that the media is also aware of what's happening, is doing everything they can to cover it up. | ||
| The fact that transgenderism has become probably the primary threat for domestic terrorism in this country. | ||
| Not a joke. | ||
| Not in a speculative, futuristic sort of way like what they do with white supremacy, right? | ||
| They're like, white supremacist violence is the number one threat. | ||
| Actually committed any violence? | ||
| Like, no, but they're definitely the number one threat. | ||
| The fact that they haven't committed violence shows you how sophisticated they are. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So the absence of evidence is, in fact, evidence. | ||
| Got it. | ||
| Not in that way. | ||
| In the way that, like, almost the majority of recent shootings have been, like, mass shootings at schools and stuff have been transgender people motivated by transgender ideology. | ||
| Right? | ||
| They're like, I'm transgender and I'm going to kill Christians because they want to kill me. | ||
| That sort of thing. | ||
| And there have been a lot. | ||
| And they covered up. | ||
| You saw with the Nashville shooter, that's on the screen here, the FBI refused to release her there, its manifesto, because it was all about transgenderism and how she hated Christians. | ||
| And they refused to release it and tried to... | ||
| Hide it and downplay it. | ||
| Didn't want people to know that that was a motivating factor. | ||
| Same thing with the NSA chat logs. | ||
| We showed you yesterday, the mainstream media reporting is like these sexually explicit chat logs where they talked about their perversions and kinks. | ||
| And it's like, no, they were transgender people. | ||
| We're talking about their transgender sexual proclivities. | ||
| It's all about transgenderism. | ||
| So they keep downplaying the transgender angle of this. | ||
| There's this cult that they're now talking about that... | ||
| We were some of the first to talk about in any big outlet, thanks to BX, Becca, BX on X, who's been reporting on this. | ||
| It's satanic transgenderism, basically, that's grooming these kids. | ||
| But when you read these stories, they talk about it being a vegan cult. | ||
| It's a cult of vegan people. | ||
| No, it's a cult of trans people. | ||
| Some of them are vegan, but transgenderism is the core ideology that they're operating on. | ||
| So the media is doing everything they can to downplay the I hope you don't need the mainstream media to lay it out for you. | ||
| I hope you don't need the mainstream media to tell you what patterns to recognize, and you can recognize them yourselves. | ||
| Now, first of all, from the Babylon Bee, I just thought this headline was brilliant. | ||
| NSA agents horrified people spying on their personal conversations. | ||
| I didn't even think about that angle. | ||
| A group of federal employees expressed feelings of shock and outrage over blatant violations of their privacy as NSA agents were horrified to learn that people had spied on their personal conversations. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Brilliant. | ||
| I didn't even think about that aspect. | ||
| But how funny is that? | ||
| But, getting serious, the whistleblower that came out with these chat logs did an interview with Chris Ruffo where they explained that it's not just that these... | ||
| Chats existed. | ||
| They were really just the tip of the iceberg. | ||
| And in fact, the ideological capture of NSA began a decade ago. | ||
| And at this point, basically a trans cult has taken over the National Security Agency and dominated it entirely. | ||
| Okay, they say about 10 years ago, they started doing this employee resource groups. | ||
| African-American veterans pride. | ||
| It was just a meeting here or there, almost like a potluck. | ||
| Culture, food, a speech. | ||
| Then it started to get more and more. | ||
| Instead of just one day a month, it was one week a month. | ||
| Or the whole month. | ||
| You could be hired as whatever, a mathematician, a mathematician, a staff officer, systems engineer, but you would spend your time going to these events and having meetings all day about it. | ||
| They got themselves into a position to help craft policy and start pushing the idea that if you want to get promoted, you had to participate in these events. | ||
| So then everything became about pride. | ||
| You'd go to a training. | ||
| It'd be about privilege, how to be a better ally. | ||
| A lady would give classes on how to talk to gender-neutral people. | ||
| You had analysts who didn't want to do reporting that they were supposed to be doing because they'd have to report on somebody's dead name and they were having a crisis of conscience about reporting the adversary's actual name because they thought it was their dead name. | ||
| They didn't want to disrespect the person. | ||
| It was like a cult that was hell-bent on pushing gender ideology. | ||
| This is what's been going on in the NSA for the last 10 years is the slow but deliberate Takeover of these organizations to where, at the end of it, eventually, like the majority of their time is spent being talked to about diversity and propagandized with transgender gay propaganda, basically. | ||
| They say there's... | ||
| There's this very small number of these people, but they wield an enormous amount of power. | ||
| And outside of the sick stuff that's in the chat logs, you see prevalent Marxist philosophy going on with these people in their chat rooms. | ||
| They hate capitalism. | ||
| They hate Christians. | ||
| They're always espousing socialist and Marxist beliefs. | ||
| I know several people at the agency brought it up and were like, hey, you know, we're here to fight for the USA and go after the adversaries. | ||
| And they got hammered. | ||
| They would just start coming out with transphobe and homophobe right away and calling you a racist. | ||
| And that's why a lot of folks are still hesitant to say anything because you still have people at the agencies in these key spots. | ||
| It infected everything. | ||
| And this is what I mean when we talk about tolerance has destroyed us. | ||
| Because you see, it doesn't happen overnight. | ||
| It's taken 10 years. | ||
| And it started off like, yeah, we'll just do a little cultural potluck we're doing. | ||
| It's like, yeah, can't see anything wrong with that. | ||
| Well, now we're going to do a little talk about pronouns. | ||
| And it's like, well, I don't really understand it, but I'm going to try to be open-minded here. | ||
| We'll talk about pronouns. | ||
| You know, soon you wake up and your entire organization is a bunch of trannies trying to one-up each other on... | ||
| How effed up their entire life is. | ||
| It's insane. | ||
| But the lesson you've got to learn is it's a slippery slope and you've got to stop it right as it buds. | ||
| Nip it in the bud and then don't be intimidated by the names they call you. | ||
| It's really not that difficult. | ||
| We're supposed to be the NSA going after their adversaries and you're talking about communism and Marxism. | ||
| This is wrong. | ||
| They're like, are you a homophobe and transphobe? | ||
| Their response should be like, no, shut up. | ||
| Why are you a Marxist? | ||
| How are you in the NSA? How is this even happening? | ||
| I mean, it's crazy that these chat logs took so long to even come out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How do, like, what happened? | |
| Just what happened to America? | ||
| I really don't understand it. | ||
| You just don't have to take it. | ||
| You just don't have to allow them to call you names. | ||
| Subjugate you through a word. | ||
| Like, it's just crazy that we allowed this to happen. | ||
| It's crazy it's been normalized. | ||
| And it's crazy that it wasn't stopped day one. | ||
| But you get somebody in power, you get one of these demented freaks in a position of authority, and anybody that stands up against them gets fired. | ||
| And the media's gonna cover it up. | ||
| They'll do, you know... | ||
| A person gets fired because they're like, hey, we got a bunch of Marxists infiltrating the NSA. And they're all a bunch of trans weirdos. | ||
| And the media will see that and go, oh my gosh, thank you for bringing us this story. | ||
| And then you turn on the nightly news and that night, headlines. | ||
| Bigot fired from NSA. Is extreme right-wing infiltration into the NSA a problem? | ||
| We didn't realize that we had so many bigoted... | ||
| Homophobic, racist right-wingers in the NSA. Here's this guy who comes out insulting trans people and calling them Marxists. | ||
| This is a problem. | ||
| We need a purge of right-wingers in the NSA. They'll take whatever is true, invert it, reverse it, and use it to oust anybody that would actually stand up against the perverted psychopath cult members that are taking over our intelligence agencies. | ||
| So it's a big sort of social-wide problem that we have here with the media playing into it. | ||
| Importantly. | ||
| They say there was a time in the last year when people were writing blog entries trying to one-up each other. | ||
| Quote, I have a non-binary child. | ||
| Oh, well, I have two trans children. | ||
| It became a social thing, trying to one-up each other with how weird they are. | ||
| The NSA, folks. | ||
| The National Security Administration. | ||
| Billions of your taxpayer dollars spying on you and one-upping each other on how many trans kids they can molest. | ||
| Or whatever. | ||
| And you have to ask the question. | ||
| Well, you have to ask a lot of questions. | ||
| I just had about 10,000 questions fly through my head. | ||
| You have to ask the question, what impact is this having on the increase in transgender domestic terrorism taking place? | ||
| Because there's a lot. | ||
| And typically when domestic terror takes place in America, the first suspect to look at is the government itself and the spy agencies that are supposed to stop it. | ||
| Actually, they're the ones creating it in the first place. | ||
| So you've got the Zizians. | ||
| The Zizians are this trans cult of approximately 12 people connected to this group ordering killings. | ||
| Some murders have actually taken place. | ||
| Again, we've talked about this with BX, so I'm not going to belabor it too much, but it's sort of the first time that it's actually broken through to the mainstream that this type of thing exists. | ||
| And I also just want to note, this is an article from the SF Gate, the San Francisco Gate, which is obviously in San Francisco, it's far left. | ||
| And they can't even deny it. | ||
| Practically every cult that you can think of that's very well-known and very dangerous in the recent past has been progressive. | ||
| It is 100% leftist ideology that composes cults in America. | ||
| And they even talk about the San Francisco headquartered Jones's People's Temple, Jonestown, for example, began as a progressive church that celebrated all races during a time of segregation. | ||
| Members were lured in with the promise of racial equality and free social services. | ||
| And Jones normalized violence, coercion and subservience that ended in mass murder in Guyana. | ||
| It's like you can almost take that paragraph. | ||
| And just like literally everything. | ||
| Lured in by claims of diversity and racial inclusion and free stuff from the government. | ||
| And it turned out to be a psychopathic cult full of violence, coercion, subservience, and mass murder. | ||
| It's like, yeah. | ||
| No, it's called progressivism. | ||
| It's literally the same thing every time. | ||
| But that's the Zizian cult that people are talking about these days. | ||
| Meanwhile... | ||
| Colorado police arrest trans suspect accused of vandalizing and placing incendiary devices at Tesla dealership. | ||
| A trans-identified male has been arrested for allegedly vandalizing a Tesla dealership in Loveland, Colorado. | ||
| Lucy Grace Nelson, 40, was taken into custody on Monday. | ||
| Nelson has been accused of placing bombs in the dealership and vandalizing property, according to a press release from the Loveland Police Department. | ||
| Nelson, who identifies as a woman and was born Justin Thomas Nelson, was arrested on probable cause. | ||
| Following an extensive investigation that began on January 29th when the first criminal incident occurred at the dealership. | ||
| A second incident occurred on the second and a third on February 7th, which is under investigation as attempted arson. | ||
| Each of these cases, police reported that explosives were left at the scene. | ||
| In addition to that... | ||
| Trans suspect arrested for allegedly planning mass casualty event against white Texas police officers. | ||
| A transgender Texas man has been arrested on terrorism charges for allegedly planning to carry out mass casualty attack against police officers, according to the FBI. Seth Andrea Gregory, 22, was taken into custody Monday, has been booked into the Nueces County Jail without bail. | ||
| FBI Houston said Gregory planned to carry out a massacre similar to the 2016 Dallas ambush where a sniper opened fire on Dallas police, killing five officers. | ||
| And injuring others. | ||
| So, just a little quick reminder that literally the number one domestic terrorist threat in the country today is transgender people. | ||
| And the majority of domestic terrorist incidents and mass shootings in the last year have been carried out by this vanishingly small population. | ||
| There's still something like 0.05% of the population or lower. | ||
| And yet... | ||
| Every week or so, there's a new story about a transgender person committing some horrific act of violence. | ||
| Another thing you should look into, and I don't have the exact numbers, but it's like instances of rape in the population. | ||
| Males, it's like 300 out of a million, something like that. | ||
| That's the frequency with which males commit an act of rape. | ||
| Something like 300 out of a million. | ||
| You know, almost nothing, right? | ||
| It's like 50 out of a million. | ||
| I think it's out of a million. | ||
| It might be 100,000, but that sounds high to me. | ||
| So I think for males, it's like around 300 out of a million. | ||
| Females, it's like 50 out of a million. | ||
| Transgender people, it's like 2,000 out of a million. | ||
| The likelihood that a transgender person is going to commit rape is like 10 times higher than a non-transgender male committing rape. | ||
| And it's being treated like a trend or a style, but it has massive medications that are associated with it. | ||
| Basically, long story short, there is a giant and increasing threat of domestic terror and overall violence from the transgender community that's going not just unconfronted by the establishment and law enforcement, but is... | ||
| Actually, law enforcement has infiltrated those organizations. | ||
| I mean, transgenderism has infiltrated law enforcement organizations and is doing everything they possibly can to progress that agenda, despite the fact that it's literally a mental illness. | ||
| Let's go out to your calls now. | ||
| We've got Andrew in New Jersey. | ||
| He's called in about the left doing damage to minorities. | ||
| Thank you for calling in, Andrew. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| And also, it was shocking to learn the history of the black community before the Democrats took over the vote. | ||
| That, as you pointed out, they were number one business owners, small business owners, and out-of-wedlock birth rate was under 10%. | ||
| So that was shocking. | ||
| Thomas Sowell, older African-American people like Thomas Sowell, he said it was safe. | ||
| He lived in Harlem. | ||
| And when it was hot out in the summer, they would sleep on the fire escape without any fear of being robbed. | ||
| And then he was actually a Marxist, he said, and he worked for the welfare agency. | ||
| And he wanted to do a study, he said, on the efficiency of their program. | ||
| And the co-workers said, no, you can't do that because this is 30 percent of our budget. | ||
| So we can't show that it's not effective. | ||
| So that shows how they just were in it to power themselves. | ||
| And this is a great, great way to describe the difference between the Democrats and the Republicans or the far left. | ||
| Former governors of New York, George Pataki and Governor Patterson, who's a Democrat, Patterson, the first black governor, Pataki's white. | ||
| They asked Pataki, what was your biggest accomplishment you're most proud of? | ||
| And he said, school choice, because he said, in the mid-90s, I was able to institute that. | ||
| And that tens of thousands, no, hundreds of thousands of black and mostly Latino, low-income kids got able to get out of those failing schools. | ||
| And then Governor Patterson, the Democrat, was saying, yeah, school choice, apparently it's great. | ||
| And he went to Sweden on the taxpayer's budget to study school choice, how good it was. | ||
| So the irony, the black first ever governor is not implementing school choice and the white governor Republican is. | ||
| So it's the same, like it's a new form of Jim Crow, just like you said. | ||
| I was on the other end of the spectrum being dyslexic and I was in the classes, which I call mostly pass through, just like you said, dyslexic. | ||
| You didn't have to study, and it was mostly black students in the lower class, mostly white students, Columbia High School, Maplewood, New Jersey. | ||
| And for the most part, we didn't learn. | ||
| We didn't have to study for tests. | ||
| We just got passed through. | ||
| So that's a new form of Jim Crow that the Democrats are running. | ||
| And I'll just lastly leave you with, imagine if Martin Luther King could see, I always said, like an Infowars-type skit, he would be proud to see the first black president, even though he's a leftist and a Democrat, but then he would be shocked and flatlined and passed out. | ||
| If he knew that there was an out-of-wedlock birth rate at almost 70 percent. | ||
| So it's like a sad irony that you have great progress, but then you have to have the Democrats sticking their nose and screwing people over. | ||
| It's like I've talked about before because it was the same thing that happened with feminism, where it's like because we have an open society that is able and can make changes when the human condition changes. | ||
| You know, you have these instances where the old form of doing things isn't really necessary anymore. | ||
| There's a transition period where, you know, with women it was like, okay, we have all these appliances. | ||
| They don't have to be in the home anymore all the time. | ||
| They have more free time. | ||
| They're looking around going, well, I'd like to get a job. | ||
| I'd like to do this other stuff. | ||
| These laws prevent me. | ||
| And so instead of allowing that process to naturally take place, you have people come in and go, actually, you're a slave. | ||
| You're oppressed. | ||
| So you have to get out of the house. | ||
| And it becomes completely inverted. | ||
| And basically they take advantage of this vulnerability, the chink in our armor, to just dismantle the whole thing. | ||
| Exactly the same thing happened with the black community where after 100 years after slavery, they basically reached parity in a lot of... | ||
| You know, metrics with the white community and we're like, okay, we shouldn't be second-class citizens anymore. | ||
| This is enough. | ||
| There was a time and it was starting to happen. | ||
| And so then you had the agitators come in and go, yeah, totally. | ||
| We need massive welfare and affirmative action. | ||
| And they just take advantage of what's naturally occurring. | ||
| They say it's not happening fast enough. | ||
| We have to do all this stuff to make it happen faster. | ||
| And it just destroys what should be a natural process of development of a community. | ||
| So, yeah, segregate your... | ||
| Desegregation was a complete scam. | ||
| And even, like, Malcolm X has talked about this at the same time, right? | ||
| It was Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., and they had different views of what they thought the future was. | ||
| And Malcolm X would say, well, it's good that we're segregated because it means we have all of our own businesses. | ||
| Like, if you want to have a black hardware store owner, then you need segregation because if we're... | ||
| If you're desegregated, then all the owners of the stores are going to be white and all the workers are going to be black, and that's not good. | ||
| We want to have our own thing, so we own all of it, and we're the ones in control of it. | ||
| Anyway, segregation is obviously not coming back anytime soon, but it also never actually went away if you look at public schools and the way that their populations are divided. | ||
| Thank you very much for the call, Andrew, New Jersey. | ||
| Let's go to Andrew, New York, on line 9 here. | ||
| You want to talk about the Romanian election? | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Andrew. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so Romania. | |
| Colin, he's a real president. | ||
| The Supreme Court got in the way. | ||
| That's similar to what happened in Brazil. | ||
| I'm not suggesting a Gladio. | ||
| I'm not suggesting a Gladio-type operation, but I do think they should put pressure. | ||
| I think that Trump should say that he's going to leave NATO, and NATO's getting ripped off from them anyways. | ||
| It's interesting, too. | ||
| Trump Jr., he had the real leader of Venezuela, the woman, I forget her name. | ||
| Yeah, because, you know, they were cheating the Smartmatic machines in Venezuela. | ||
| And, yeah, he was saying, too, he was saying, too, that they're not, like, interested in, like, you know, a gladiator type thing, but to put pressure on, like... | ||
| The regime to get rid of them, you know? | ||
| I think what you're saying about Romania is certainly true. | ||
| I think the latest I've heard, the guy, Georgescu, is in charge with crimes against humanity. | ||
| Like all these insane, way over the top crimes that he's absolutely innocent of. | ||
| And yeah, Romania, I believe it is a NATO member, right? | ||
| So if they get into war with Russia, then that would invoke Article 5. I bet they could do that with Poland, too. | ||
| I mean, the point of NATO at this point is essentially just a tripwire. | ||
| It's theirs to, you know, aggravate Russia to get them to attack so that then you have a valid excuse or, you know, a treaty that you can lean on to justify your regime change operation in Russia. | ||
| So, yeah, we should absolutely get out of NATO, and I would like to see Trump be a little bit more forceful on this Romanian issue. | ||
| Thank you for the call, Andrew. | ||
| Let's go to... | ||
| We'll go to Willie in California. | ||
| Let's go to Willie in California on Line 8. Go ahead. | ||
| You're on the air. | ||
| Hey, Harrison. | ||
| Yeah, when it comes to oath of office, I've been thinking about this. | ||
| It's almost like doctors, federal and local officials in government having to swear an oath to office is totally meaningless and unadhered to these days. | ||
| Where are our constitutional sheriff while everyone's just saying that they're following orders? | ||
| Doctors are supposed to do no harm when there's no informed consent and no medical or religious exemptions. | ||
| They cannot be so dangerously ignorant anymore. | ||
| Todd Callender, constitutional attorney, reported he's caught politicians not having an official signed legal oath of office on file and many dual citizens as well. | ||
| They should be withdrawn from office if they're refusing to sign their oath of office. | ||
| Oh, 100%. | ||
| And absolutely nobody, in my opinion, nobody should have a government position if they're a dual citizen. | ||
| And, like, some people would want to get rid of dual citizenship entirely. | ||
| I get why people would want to be dual citizens. | ||
| I don't really blame the average person, especially if they, you know, come from another country and still want to participate in the elections in that old country or whatever. | ||
| I get it. | ||
| I think people should be allowed to be dual citizens. | ||
| I think you should give it up if you want to be a congressman or a judge or any official position with decision-making powers. | ||
| Renouncement of your former allegiance. | ||
| And you should not be able to serve in our country's institutions loyal to another country. | ||
| But I have a feeling certain advocacy groups wouldn't like that. | ||
| That's going to do it for us, folks. | ||
| Stay tuned. | ||
| Alex Jones, 90 seconds. | ||
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
| Come forward slash show. | ||
| Go to the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Get the very best supplements, the highest quality like Ultimate Turmeric, Ultimate CMOS, and so many other game-changing formulas that you will love and that will blow you away. | ||
| Then the widest selection of Patriot t-shirts and hoodies and sweaters and ball caps, and we're just adding more and more. | ||
| It is the biggest selection. | ||
| Over 400 different designs. | ||
| We are winning, ladies and gentlemen, but InfoWars is recognized as the tip. | ||
| of the spear in the fight against the globalists. | ||
| Elon's kicking their ass. | ||
| Trump's kicking their ass because you've supported them. | ||
| But please don't forget about Infowars because in this fight, Elon and Trump, what they're doing is way larger and just incredible and amazing. | ||
| But you look then below that and we are the most effective. | ||
| We are now reaching the most people of any of the shows out there. | ||
| And not just the Patriot broadcast. | ||
| We're reaching over 100 million people a day, conservatively. | ||
| And that's because you stood with us and you supported us. | ||
| But these new viewers, these new listeners, they're not going to the AlexJonesStore.com and they're not getting product. | ||
| It is the hardcore viewers and listeners like you, the Patriots that helped launch this whole thing that are keeping us on the air. | ||
| You're not the Johnny-come-latelys. | ||
| You're the people that understand how important it is to support independent, patriot, pro-human, anti-globalist. | ||
| Media that are enemies of humanity. | ||
| So get great products. | ||
| At the same time, keep us on air at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| I want to thank you all for your past support, and I want to encourage you now to take action. | ||
| Become a VIP. It's $30 a month. | ||
| Cancel any time. | ||
| Get $40 to spend in the store each month. | ||
| Special deals, special sales, special offers. | ||
| Become a VIP if you're going to buy anything because you make money on your first purchase when you do it. | ||
| Again, thank you so much. | ||
| Check out TheAlexJonesStore.com. |
Export Selection