All Episodes
Feb. 4, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:37:30
The American Journal: Trump Admin’s Musk-Led DOGE Shines Spotlight On USAID Funding Creation Of COVID-19 Bioweapon At Wuhan Lab - FULL SHOW - 02/04/2025
Participants
Main voices
c
chase geiser
07:47
h
harrison smith
01:45:06
r
ron paul
05:38
Appearances
a
alex jones
03:38
m
marco rubio
01:37
m
mike benz
02:18
r
robert f kennedy-jr
01:13
s
scott jennings
01:40
Clips
a
abby phillip
00:15
a
anthony rubin
00:12
c
chris van hollen
00:13
c
chuck schumer
00:30
i
ilhan omar
00:07
j
joe biden
00:04
k
karoline leavitt
00:38
r
rachel maddow
00:08
s
sean hannity
00:08
s
stew peters
00:07
t
tom homan
00:12
t
tucker carlson
00:20
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Today staffers for the US Agency for International Development, known as USAID, were told to stay out of the Washington DC headquarters.
USAID staffers said they tracked 600 employees who reported being locked out of the agency's computer systems overnight.
USAID security chiefs were placed on leave after refusing to turn over classified material in restricted areas.
chuck schumer
An unelected shadow government is conducting a hostile takeover of the federal government.
Friday night.
The so-called Department of Government Efficiency, led by billionaire Elon Musk, gained access to the Treasury Department's entire system of payments, including Social Security and Medicare benefits and Americans' tax refunds.
alex jones
And that is only a snapshot.
That in and of itself is irrevocably discrediting and devastating the entire globalists, not just here, but worldwide.
Money laundering, political control system of the tax-free foundations, the NGOs, the CIA, the State Department, and their counterparts in other Western countries.
mike benz
So what is USAID? When people hear the name USAID, they focus on aid.
They focus on thinking like it's humanitarian work.
But aid is not actually in the name of USAID. USAID stands for the United States Agency for International Development.
Not aid.
It's not a charity.
And international development is simply capacity building.
It is local and regional capacity building.
Done.
Across the whole world, i.e.
internationally.
The primal id in USAID, international development, is about capacity building of assets that can be used by either the Pentagon, the State Department, or the CIA for their own activities.
So if you're the Secretary of State and you were asked by the National Security Council or the President to do something in a different country, overthrow their government, how would you do that?
And the first thing that I said is you would look at the assets that already exist in the country.
Do we need new assets in addition to the ones that we currently have?
Are the existing assets, can they achieve this simply by giving them enough money, giving them enough resources, giving them enough training, giving them enough support?
One of the main ways that that capacity building would be financed would be through USAID. USAID would say that it's doing something, funding a hospital system, funding universities, funding civil society organizations, funding media institutions, funding independent media in the region.
Sorry, that's something in my eye.
Independent media in the region.
On USAID payroll.
And those institutions, those assets, would then be bigger and more powerful and more capable, capacity, more capable of serving the State Department's goal, a.k.a.
advancing U.S. national interests.
robert f kennedy-jr
There are riots, and it's called the Medellin rebellion in Ukraine, which we're not told that we are financing those riots.
The newspapers never told us, our government never told us.
USAID, which is a CIA front, put $5 billion into funding those riots.
Those riots lead to a coup d'etat against the first democratically elected government of the Ukraine.
It was a government that refused to choose sides and to say, we're going to be on the side of the West.
So we wanted them out.
A month before that government has overthrown, Victoria Nuland, who's part of the centerpiece of the neocon ideology and who is now a high-level official in the State Department, has a secret call with the U.S. ambassador, which is tape-recorded and is now public, which anybody can go and look up, where she is picking the new cabinet for Ukraine, which is...
You know, which is a U.S. Western cabinet.
So they're picking the new government a month before the old government is overthrown.
tucker carlson
Is that how democracy is?
Is that democracy when Tori Newland picks your government?
unidentified
In terms of sort of the process moving ahead, we want to keep the moderate Democrats together.
tucker carlson
that the problem is going to be Tani Book and his guys.
unidentified
And, you know, I'm sure that's part of what Yanukovych is calculating on all of this.
I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience.
He's the guy, you know, what he needs is Cleach and Tani Book on the outside.
He needs to be talking to them four times a week.
You know, I just think Cleach going in, he's going to be at that level working for Yatsenyuk.
It's just not going to work.
alex jones
Trump didn't just freeze the $3 trillion.
In the NGO slush funds last week and then some low-level federal judge blocked it for now.
And Musk and Trump said, that's fine.
We're already in control of the payment systems and almost all this is totally illegal.
And so we're just blocking all these payments ourselves at the executive level.
And we're just going to expose it all to the light of day.
unidentified
It's Tuesday, February 4th in the year of our Lord, 2025. And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
Welcome to The American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
Coming to you live, as always, from Austin, Texas, here at the InfoWars headquarters.
We're going to do your dispatch in just a second, but I think we're going to start with a major story.
Not just for us personally, but should be for everybody who cares about free speech and a free press in this country.
And that is the story of what we discovered about InfoWars and the FBI. I'll just let Chase tell the story.
Here is clip number eight.
FOIA documents recently released under the Trump administration prove the FBI has been spying on info wars since at least 2013. Let's watch.
chase geiser
When you submit a FOIA request, you get a boilerplate release letter.
And it just marks off specifically why information is redacted in the following documents that are given to you.
So they provided me with two or three documents.
And these checkboxes as to why the information was redacted.
So if we go to the section of this release letter, we can see that they redacted information to protect personnel privacy and Information that could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwanted invasion of personal privacy or could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of confidential sources,
including a state, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis and in the case of record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation.
So basically the implication here is that information in this FOIA request was redacted to protect the identity of informants on Infowars, informants against Infowars over the course of the last several years, as you'll see.
Now enclosed after this release letter is a very simple document, an import form from the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Now, this form, as you can see, is dated 6-28-2019, but there's some very interesting information enclosed here, despite the fact that it's 90% redacted, as you can see.
If you look down here in the middle of the document, you'll see that Infowars has been classified as a white, racially motivated extremist organization.
Under a Type 3 assessment, White supremacists are some of the biggest threats to the country, according to a new report from the Department of Homeland Security.
unidentified
The threat of violence by white supremacists is very real.
The assault on black Americans has continued.
Pay attention, folks, because this is a problem that we need to confront.
This virus of hate and white supremacy and white nationalism in our country is not Done.
Yet.
rachel maddow
And it's happening amid this unrelenting wave of white supremacist-motivated mass murder.
unidentified
The most dangerous terrorist threat to our homeland is white supremacy.
The most lethal terrorist threat in the homeland, white supremacists.
joe biden
The most lethal terrorist threat to the homeland today, white supremacy is terrorism.
unidentified
We have seen a rise in white supremacy.
The number one threat to this country, domestic terrorism-wise, is white supremacy.
chase geiser
And I'm going to show you a little bit of our broadcast from December 10, 2013, to give you a sense of what the FBI may have been listening to on the day that they classified us as a Type 3 assessment, which basically means that we're a national security threat.
alex jones
But it was Obama saying—in fact, I forgot to tell you guys to look for this.
McBreen saw it, too.
He was telling me about it this morning.
He said, listen, it's a conspiracy by Republicans that we ever targeted the Tea Party or anybody with the IRS. That came out in Congress.
Tens of thousands of audits, harassments, indictments, FBI, you name it, libertarians, conservatives, gun groups, pro-life groups, Tea Party groups, army manuals demonizing them.
I mean, it's all out there.
And that the IRS got caught lying about it, and then now we learn the FBI blocked investigations of it, and that not one...
Communist, progressive, authoritarian group, calling themselves liberal, got audited.
They were all given their tax-exempt status and were not investigated.
chase geiser
Now, after receiving this documentation, as you can imagine, I was very curious as to what a Type 3 assessment meant.
And I asked ChatGPT, and I asked Google, and I think that I finally got to the bottom of this information.
A brief AI overview on a Google search says an FBI Type 3 assessment is a type of assessment that requires supervisory approval and documentation using electronic communication.
The explanation is that the FBI can open an assessment on any person or organization even if they don't have a criminal record.
Assessments give the FBI the power to recruit informants.
Question people without revealing the agent's identity.
Search government and commercial databases and conduct physical surveillance of a person's public movements.
Now, you've heard reports over the course of the last several years, at least, that Alex Jones has been followed.
I've been followed.
I know Rob Agueros has been followed.
I know for a period before Owen Schroer went to prison, he was pulled over at least once a week right outside of our office.
I was a couple of times within the same month as well.
And so we've seen suspicious activity like this over the course of the years here at Infowars.
We've seen bizarre behavior on some of our electronic devices, mouses that go haywire, things of that nature, as if our...
Devices are being monitored or controlled remotely.
And when I looked into more details, I saw some very interesting things.
I realized that our Type 3 assessment status is something that was catalyzed less than three months after James Comey became the director of the FBI under the Obama administration in 2013. How do these shameful comments of the President of the United States, his outright refusal to condemn white supremacy, dangerous white supremacy, affect the psychology?
unidentified
Of groups like the Proud Boys and other violent extremist groups like them, other white nationalist groups that we have seen conduct and carry out such violence.
How does it affect the psychology of these groups?
It gives them license and it makes them cool in the eyes of the people who make up that radioactive stew.
And so it will attract more people to their warped view of the world and to their groups.
It is...
It is a free pass to people that nobody wants in their communities.
chase geiser
And so I looked up the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide from 2013, which was updated just a month after Comey was made the director of the FBI. To determine what was really going on with a Type 3 assessment.
Now, this document in full is about 698 pages long, and I was able to find 19 pages within the document that described Type 3 assessments.
And I'm not going to read all 19 pages to you, but I will read snippets for your information.
90-day reviews as well as 30-day reviews and 60-day reviews on a rolling basis in order to keep us in a Type 3 assessment status.
We have no evidence that our Type 3 status as a national security threat, as a white supremacist, racially motivated extremist organization threat, has been terminated.
We actually believe that as of now, we're still classified as this national security threat and that we're still being watched, spied on by the FBI. So they check every 30, 60, and 90 days with a supervisor within the FBI to continue to keep us in this type 3 assessment status, which we know that we were in for at least six years from 2013 to 2019 and probably are still in today.
And so we got basically one or two little redacted pages that gave us no information whatsoever, but indicated to us that we were being spied on by the FBI. Now, this all began in 2013, within 90 days of James Comey becoming the director of the FBI, obviously during the Obama administration.
And as you, the Infowarriors of the world, know, ever since 2013, Infowars has been under quite a bit of attack.
We've only been able to stay on the air by miraculous support from you, the supporters, by going to thealexjonesstore.com, for example.
But I'm not here to plug.
I'm here to reveal that through our FOIA request, we have proven that the deep state has been attacking Infowars.
It's not something that we just say hyperbolically or we just claim because it's fun to speculate as to the nature of their sentiment toward us.
We have the documentation that Obama's FBI, that Comey's FBI, classified us as a national security threat in 2013. And since then, we have been spied on.
We have been sued civilly.
You've seen the videos of the whistleblowers and the leaks from CIA contractors and employees who have even admitted that they've catalyzed some of these lawsuits against us.
unidentified
Alex Jones.
Yeah, so we were after him.
You are?
He did what we wanted.
Which is what?
He took his money away.
I was put into a position they called chief division counsel, which is the head attorney for that FBI division.
He took legal counsel to the leadership of the division.
alex jones
And here he is admitting that he went to the Costco firm and that they developed this system and that they filed this lawsuit and that they came after me.
And I've never even said his name, never even talked about him, didn't even know who he was.
How can something like this happen in America?
How can we be denied a real trial where we're innocent until proven guilty, not guilty until proven how guilty?
unidentified
When's the first time you watched a video of Mr. Haldig on Mr. Jones' show?
I would be guessing, sir, I would say approximately like 2016. Where were you when you saw that?
I was sitting in my office on the second floor at FBI New Haven.
You didn't file suit at that point in 2016?
No, at that point, I couldn't get anybody to help me.
You were looking.
I was, by then, I'm pretty certain by 2016, I had contacted the Agents Association.
I had been looking for people.
I had been asking the U.S. Attorney's Office to help me.
I had been asking the FBI New Haven to help me.
So, yes, I was looking for help.
And then finally, you know, the only person ever to even listen was Mr. Koskoff.
chase geiser
We've been debanked and we've been deplatformed.
All of this in the context of what Elon Musk has revealed with the X-Files and how the intelligence community had regular briefings with major social media platforms.
What even Zuckerberg has admitted to Joe Rogan on his podcast goes to show that this classification was not because we're actually white racially motivated extremists.
This classification was for the purpose of spying on us, giving information to our opponents.
Waging lawfare on us and then leveraging this classification to debank us and deplatform us and silence us in any way possible.
tucker carlson
They set about the FBI sets about trying to destroy him.
And so begins this incredible saga of lies about Alex Jones, which you probably all heard about.
I'm not going to re-litigate it, but that was the FBI that did that.
chase geiser
This is a major and egregious example of the violation of our First Amendment, both as our individual freedom of speech is protected in the Constitution and as the freedom of press is protected in the Constitution in that First Amendment.
So right now we finally have the documents, and it's time for more documentation to be declassified.
I want to see what happened when we were in Type 1 and Type 2 assessments.
I want to see what the reviews looked like, why they were justifying the surveillance of Infowars, Alex Jones and this crew.
I want to know the answers why, and I want to see them admitted.
I think I already know.
I think you already know the reasons why.
Because we were political opposition, and they weaponized the Department of Justice, the FBI. Folks, stay tuned.
Please support Infowars and be the reason that Alex Jones and this crew and this network will always be on the air.
harrison smith
All right, so there is the latest podcast.
Alex Jones wrote, FOIA documents recently released under the Trump administration prove the FBI has been spying on Infowars since 2013. Disgustingly classifying Infowars as a white, racially motivated extremist organization under a Type 3 assessment classification.
And of course, most of the stuff in that FOIA request was redacted.
We're not actually able to see the details.
It's just pretty amazing.
And it's a shame that people have such a distorted and warped view of all this.
I mean, I guess it's one of the tactics, as you just saw Tucker Carlson pointing out.
The lies about Alex Jones and Infowars have come from the FBI themselves, launching a smear campaign against us so that nobody bothers to defend us.
When they destroy our rights.
Let's pretend it's not Infowars.
Just pretend it's any other organization.
Just comprehend what's going on here.
That we are a media organization.
We are journalists, for lack of a better word.
And the United States government, for the last 12 years, has spied on us and had monthly meetings where they go over our communications.
And our coverage, they have been systematically surveilling a media organization by calling it a terrorist organization for the past 12 years.
I wonder how many other organizations are on that list.
How many other upstanding, totally lawful, totally non-criminal organizations trying to speak out against the US government?
Have had their communications surveilled for over a decade.
And I wonder if other businesses were subjected to that type of scrutiny, if they'd still be around.
That's the other thing about this.
That means that for 12 years, the FBI has had a continual ear at our door, peeking through the keyhole, watching us continuously.
And they have absolutely nothing.
To justify the surveillance alone, let alone any further activity.
And of course, this sort of coincides with the report that I did a couple weeks ago, showing that if you look on Google News by the Google News date range, you find that there were no stories about Alex Jones and Sandy Hook until one week after Donald Trump's inauguration.
Actually, like the next day after the inauguration, suddenly there were all these headlines associating Alex Jones with Sandy Hook and Trump with Alex Jones.
Because it was always political.
Because the impetus behind the lawsuits and the destruction of Infowars has always been political.
And it is, of course, our effectiveness that makes it so scary to them.
But just take away the names.
Take away the specifics.
And what you're left with is the fact that the United States government...
It labels media outlets as domestic terror organizations in order to justify their censorship, their removal from the internet.
Of course, this would have to go into, I guarantee you, when we were kicked off of all the social media platforms, you had the FBI going to them and going, look, this isn't just a media outlet.
They may call themselves media outlet, but we have had them classified as a domestic terrorist organization for years.
And you can't have a domestic terrorist organization on your platform, can you?
You don't want that, do you?
Just absolutely outrageous.
And in a way, just confirmation of what we have assumed to be true the entire time.
In a way, it's almost kind of cool.
It's kind of cool, actually.
I feel like a lot of people probably have the fantasy, I know I did, in college or even high school, being like, man, the stuff I'm looking up, the stuff I'm writing, I bet they're watching me.
I bet I have an FBI guy looking over my shoulder.
It's kind of cool to know that it's true.
It's kind of cool that definitely, yes, for sure my phones are tapped by the FBI, 100%.
And yet it hasn't stopped us or slowed us down or even made us think twice about it.
Because we're right, and we know we're right.
And they're not going to intimidate or surveil us into complacency.
So just know...
There's nothing fraudulent about anything that InfoWars does.
It's just if you've ever wanted a guaranteed real deal media organization, you cannot get better than InfoWars.
We've been through court cases that have taken a fine tooth comb and a magnifying glass to every single financial transaction we've had for decades.
Found nothing worth noting.
They got access to...
Like our phones and every communication we've made for years.
And they had nothing.
They had absolutely nothing.
The FBI has been spying on us for a decade and more.
And they still have nothing on us.
And yet it proves that we're the real deal.
We are the enemy of the deep state.
And boy, do they realize what that feels like now.
Do they realize...
How serious the threat really was.
Not because we're racially motivated extremists, but because we've had a long-term plan to do exactly what's happening right now.
The full-scale dismantling of the entire deep state false flag apparatus that is attempting to enslave us all.
So we're gonna keep racking up victories.
I'm going to keep reporting on them.
I'll do the daily dispatch on the other side.
But just know that this entire time, for the last decade or more, InfoWars has just been trudging along under continuous, relentless assault from the most powerful organizations in the history of the world, including the American military industrial complex, including the leftist groups that are now being dismantled by Elon Musk and Donald Trump.
And through it all, it is our resolute conviction and our sincere adherence to the founding principles of this country that have kept us on the right track and kept us untouchable as we still, as a country, retain some semblance of justice and due retain some semblance of justice and due process.
And free speech.
Now we're losing that.
That is going away.
But they've used every trick in the book to label us whatever they need to justify their crushing activities.
And yet we've survived and even thrived throughout all of this because you go to Infowarsstore.com and TheAlexJonesStore.com.
Go to TheAlexJonesStore.com today, get a chance to win that incredible Bronco, and of course, get the merchandise to let people know what type of patriot you are.
It just is shocking to me that they can...
Justify this and then apparently justify it every month for over a decade.
Obviously, it's unjustified completely, but the fact is that there's so little oversight right now.
They can just do this.
You just have these, you know, unelected spy masters in Washington, D.C. to go, gee, this media outlet sure is.
You know, revealing our secrets.
Sure is speaking out about plans we'd rather have remain clandestine.
What should we call them?
Should we call them a terrorist group?
Seems a little extreme.
But yeah, let's call it, let's say, what do we say, Christian, white?
I mean, what label do we want to put on these guys?
Because none of them actually matter.
Like, you might as well call us a black supremacist organization.
Call us a Muslim extremist domestic terror threat.
It doesn't actually matter.
They're just like, alright, pick the one that sort of aligns closely.
They're white, alright, call them white extremists.
And it's just amazing to me that we have a country where not only can that happen, that it can get approved and go through all the layers of governmental approval necessary for that label to stick.
And then every month for 12 years, some FBI manager gets together with whatever case agent is on our case.
And apparently justifies this label somehow.
And it gets continued and perpetuated for over a decade.
Reminds me of a skit I want to do where it's the FBI. And it's funny because, again, you know, we would make jokes like this.
But now we have the FOIA request.
It's actually true.
Where you have like an FBI agent or the FBI manager of the InfoWars case has to keep replacing agents because they keep coming back to do their monthly reports going, yeah, no, they didn't really say anything violent.
They talked about this guy Jeffrey Epstein.
Have you ever heard of him?
I mean, is it true?
And the FBI's like, alright, you gotta go on a different case.
We gotta get a new guy into InfoWars.
Every time we send somebody to surveil InfoWars, they come back talking about a global pedophile conspiracy.
It's relentless.
This is the American Journal.
We are going to talk quite a bit about USAID again today, especially they're helping you create the COVID-19 bioweapon.
But when we talk about USAID or CIA or NED, I'll tell you, they love their...
I can't ever think of the word.
What is it?
Anagrams?
Acronyms.
Three members of the crew just chimed into my ear at once.
It was like...
That was very funny.
I wish y'all could hear that.
It was three voices all at once all saying acronym.
Like an echo.
It was epic.
That was cool.
Acronyms.
They freaking love acronyms.
So if you want to be a good liberal, you're in favor of acronyms.
If it's an acronym, you're for it.
FBI, CIA, completely for it.
LGBTQ, yes, absolutely for it.
I don't trust acronyms.
But yeah, they freaking love them.
I'm going to write down the word acronyms so I'll never forget it again.
The problem is that I one time learned that sometimes the term is initialism.
And it's like acronyms are ones you pronounce, but initialisms are ones where you say the letters.
Something like that.
FBI would be an initialism.
Whereas USAID would be an acronym.
I can't actually remember what the details even are, but ever since then, the word initialism stuck in my mind, and the word acronym has gotten squeezed out.
These people love acronyms.
But no matter what, any of these acronyms, FBI, CIA, USAID, WEF, WHO, I mean, all of these are just the heads of the hydra.
We've chopped one off, singed it so it can't be rebuilt.
And we're going to talk a lot about that with USAID. But it's all part of the same beast.
It's all part of the same larger organization, the same blob confronting us.
The acronym HYDRA that we're having to deal with right now.
The AH, as I call it.
So we're going to talk quite a bit about USAID, including some very interesting remarks from...
Donald Trump himself and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has now been placed as acting head of USAID in the interim.
So we'll get into that.
We'll talk about deportations, more massive protests across the country, including one here in Austin yesterday.
Getting a little bit spicy with phalanx of police facing off with these unfriendly aliens.
Waving their own country's flag in America in an effort not to get deported as if the leftist mindset wasn't incoherent enough.
It's only becoming more so.
We're going to get into a lot of that.
We're going to open up the phone lines for your calls.
And we're going to talk about anti-Semitism and the Jewish inquisition that's now been launched across every federal department because that's exactly what it is.
And we'll use some rhetorical trickery ourselves to illustrate that.
All of that and more in today's episode, a lot of videos to show you, so let's just get right into it.
Here it is, your Daily Dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Tuesday, the 4th of February, 2025. China imposes 15% tariffs on coal.
And liquid natural gas in response to Trump's tariffs.
Trump counters tariffs on U.S. products.
It will also investigate Google.
China announced retaliatory tariffs on American imports in an antitrust investigation into Google on Tuesday, just minutes after a sweeping levy on Chinese products imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump took effect.
American tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico were also set to go into effect Tuesday.
Before Trump's agreed to a 30-day pause as the two countries acted to address his concerns about border safety and drug trafficking.
So yes, the tariff war is on, and it's America versus the world, and we're extremely confident in our eventual victory.
Sometimes the victory doesn't even take that long.
It was about 24 hours after Mexico and Canada pretended like they were going to stand up to us that they folded like a cheap house of cards.
Not even a regular house of cards.
A cheap one.
From Washington Post.
Trump halts tariffs on Canada and Mexico for 30 days.
Trump halts these tariffs as both offer new border security plans.
President Trump agreed Monday to grant Mexico and Canada a 30-day reprieve on U.S. tariffs that were scheduled to take effect Tuesday after both countries pledged to intensify their efforts to prevent illicit drugs and migrants from crossing into the United States.
The president's decision, which followed separate telephone conversations with Mexican and Canadian leaders, averted, at least for now, an economic shock that was expected to push both U.S. neighbors into recession while slowing growth and raising inflation in the United States.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum was the first to secure a tariffs extension when she promised to rush 10,000 National Guard troops to the border to block the flow of fentanyl and other drugs into the United States.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau needed two calls with Trump before securing a delay in return for implementing a border security package, including the appointment of a fentanyl czar and several previously announced initiatives.
So, yes, they have both agreed to do what Trump was requesting, which was simply not allow their borders to be completely porous and open and allow terrorists and drugs into our country, which they should have just been doing anyway.
unidentified
Bye.
harrison smith
But they have 30 days until Trump decides to get some other concession out of them.
It's very exciting.
Meanwhile, again, our sort of top story today that we open the show with, political bombshell, Trump's DOJ declassified secret FBI documents proving Democrat operatives illegally designated conservative media outlets.
Alex Jones covered the FBI documents showing that the Bureau under the Obama administration had classified InfoWars with a Type 3 threat assessment, the highest national security threat level that falls just below warranting an official criminal investigation into potential homegrown violent extremist groups.
And you can see that report at InfoWars.com and on real Alex Jones on X and at real Chase Geyser who...
Did the report and did the FOIA request in the first place to get the information about the way they've been spying on us for decades.
Really incredible.
Meanwhile, a U.S. Air Force spy plane runs SIGINT operation, signal intelligence operation, near Cabo as U.S. preps for potential cartel fight.
Yeah, I think the cartels maybe didn't expect just how serious Trump was.
They may have armored cars and Wi-Fi jammers.
And bulletproof vests.
But we're America.
But we're American.
We have the American military on our side.
And so now we're sending reconnaissance aircraft over Mexico.
Just to check things out.
Just to have a little look around for a while.
Pretty incredible.
So we'll see.
We hope to see more action against the Mexican cartels very shortly.
Finally, we have this.
Confirmed Kamala paid Obama $100,000 and Cardi B $58,000 to campaign for her.
Yeah.
Yeah, no, they have to pay for people to be their friends.
It's really pathetic.
Obama received money through Renegade 44 LLC company Cardi B previously claimed, quote, she didn't get paid a dollar.
Kamala Harris' failed presidential campaign paid a company tied to former President Barack Obama nearly $100,000, while records also show she paid $58,000 to rapper Cardi B, who'd previously claimed she'd appeared at a Kamala rally for free.
Man, imagine spending that much money on something so utterly pointless.
I mean, do you think a single vote was swapped over because of this?
If anything...
Obama's participation drove people away from Kamala because of how tone deaf he was in his castigating of black men for not wanting to vote for a woman who they called black but is in fact of Indian and Jamaican descent.
So that's your Daily Dispatch brought to you of course by InfoWarsStore.com and The Alex Jones Show.
I mean what a scumbag.
What a rotten dude.
And first of all did anybody think Obama wasn't a Democrat?
Like obviously he's going to Support her.
The announcement of his endorsement, it's not like anything valuable.
Obviously, he's going to endorse the Democrats, but it's just so skeevy, this former president, like, well, how much will you give me?
I'll probably do it anyway, but what can I squeeze out of you first?
So funny.
I mean, especially the way that they criticize Trump for actually embracing capitalistic ideals.
Meanwhile, every single one of Their heroes is just the most, I don't know, mercenary, cynical, and exploitative people of all time.
They're just the worst.
They really are just the worst, man.
Everything you hear about them just makes them that much worse.
They're the ones that put us on a list as white supremacists, domestic terrorists.
Yeah, we were white supremacist domestic terrorists before it was cool.
Okay, we didn't even have to storm into the Capitol.
All we had to do was talk about the world around us.
And we're such a danger.
They have to assign agents to us for decades on end.
God only knows how much money they've spent just watching InfoWars.
You do have to wonder.
Well, you don't really have to wonder, actually.
I was going to say you have to wonder how they could even watch us and still come to the same conclusion, but it was always a lie.
I forgot.
It was always a lie, and they know it's a lie.
Just imagine watching Alex Jones day in and day out for the FBI, just hearing every single day the reassertion of the global aspect to what we're doing, the fact we're fighting for everybody of every race, color, and creed, the fact that we are just embodiments of the American ideal.
As laid out by our founding fathers.
And still, at the end of the day, going, yeah, no, I'm pretty sure they're all KKK. Yeah, definitely.
100%.
For sure.
It's just absolutely...
A scam is complete and utter ridiculous and dangerous scam.
And again, you have to wonder how many other media outlets got the same treatment.
And I wonder if any left-wing organizations...
Got the same treatment.
Or any mainstream media organizations, for that matter.
I mean, we're bigger than most mainstream media organizations, so how do we get called a domestic terrorist group?
And they don't, considering the fact that they're actually responsible for the deaths of God only knows how many people by spreading their lies and their own well-observed hatred.
Of various people based on their immutable characteristics.
But it's alright.
It's fine.
We'll just keep going.
We'll just keep doing what we've always done.
Trusting in the remnant of American freedom that still exists.
And trusting that if they don't get the message that Trump is an olive branch, is a peace offering to them.
And actually try to double down on this.
Anyway, we'll move on.
We'll move on now.
We are going to talk more about USAID. I want to go to a video now from Ryan Matta.
Ryan, M-A-T-T-A. USAID is a terrorist organization itself.
mike benz
Let's go now to clip number 15. It was USAID. That I fear much more than the CIA. Because the USAID is how CIA gets shit done.
unidentified
USAID is clearly in the job of trying to bring about regime change.
It has secret bank accounts, shell companies.
mike benz
USAID gets 50 billion a year in US taxpayer money.
That's a larger overt fund than the CIA has.
unidentified
USAID perhaps is the new CIA. Have we ever tried to meddle in other countries elections?
Oh, probably.
chuck schumer
This is not just about over there.
unidentified
This is about here.
They have a process, a system by which they destroy other nations, and they use that same process and system in order to destroy the United States.
mike benz
It's a plot against our own people.
unidentified
America, what if I told you that the United States government was acting like the world's Gestapo, using organizations like USAID under the pretense of humanitarian aid to topple governments, install politicians, and orchestrate regime changes in third world countries?
I disagree with that as somebody who has helped plan coup d'etat.
Not here, but, you know, other places.
stew peters
These are places that are practically entirely run at this point by the CIA and the US State Department, which is, of course, a CIA front.
mike benz
USAID provides most of the money.
robert f kennedy-jr
This isn't a giveaway.
mike benz
The State Department provides the policy vision.
unidentified
This makes a difference to people's perception of us.
Tricky endeavors, whether it's fighting terrorism.
mike benz
Al-Shabaab groups in U.S. aid camps.
unidentified
Or narcotics.
mike benz
Joe Biden's State Department is commanding the Taliban to keep the opium flowing.
unidentified
Or oppression or resistance to governance.
mike benz
Those U.S. aid trucks were stopped at the border to Venezuela with fully automatic weapons.
unidentified
All of those things.
mike benz
I don't think that's humanitarian aid.
robert f kennedy-jr
What a difference that makes.
unidentified
And if we stand for democracy anywhere, we have to stand for it everywhere, including in Guatemala.
Guatemala.
What if I told you that USAID, the State Department, Nothing to do with that?
chuck schumer
Correlation, not causation?
unidentified
That is absurd.
They didn't deny it, which means that they admitted it.
This is a, no question, a political shocker in Guatemala.
The U.S. government, the Biden administration, helped cover up voter fraud.
robert f kennedy-jr
Why Guatemala?
chuck schumer
Why not some other country?
unidentified
Guatemala is concerned about child trafficking, the NGOs that are trafficking the children.
Jill Biden was the chairman of the board of Save the Children.
You guys just rated Save the Children.
Guess who stepped in?
The State Department, U.S. Embassy, and USAID. Another coincidence?
America, what if I told you that DHS, under the direct orders of Alejandro Mayorkas, would create a public-private partnership with Mexican cartels, and that HHS, under the direct orders of Xavier Basara, As to who we know where they are, that is outside the responsibility of the Department of Homeland Security.
This is nothing but lies.
Nothing but lies.
Secretary Mayorkas, he acts like none of this ever happens.
It's his policies that cause over half a million of children being smuggled in this country.
mike benz
And he also knew who to blame.
chuck schumer
HHS places those children.
unidentified
That's on you.
Was that a question to me?
Are you familiar with the sponsors that utilize a strip club as an address?
You shrug your shoulders and then send another batch of kids out to sponsors.
A human trafficking bust at an egg farm.
Federal prosecutors call it modern-day slavery.
chuck schumer
Of course, we invest.
unidentified
There you go.
harrison smith
Ryan Mata Media presents Operation Amber Alert.
That's just a little preview.
Amber Alert, Guatemala.
Very, very well done.
And very horrifying.
And of course, this is the thing about USAID. The focus now is about money.
It's about waste.
It's about the amount of cash that is being poured into organizations overseas.
You've got the White House press secretary coming out and giving a list.
We, of course, have gone over some of their more egregious examples of waste, spending millions of dollars on whatever, you know, diversity musicals in Ireland or whatever.
But it's not about money.
Is it?
I mean, everything USAID is involved in, yeah, it costs a lot of money, but it's not just about money.
People are treating this as if this was just a cash grab by people, and to some extent it was, but all of the people grabbing the cash were doing it under claims of fighting things like white supremacy, pushing things like diversity.
That's a real example.
DEI musical in Ireland.
Funded by American taxpayer dollars.
Now, if it was just about money, you'd probably equally see money flowing out of USAID to fund Irish heritage dances.
Some sort of program about English heritage and history.
There's nothing ever is funded that actually boosts the national strength or It is all to tear down other countries and to tear down ourselves.
All of it is money pouring into DEI and other programs that can be justified rhetorically as if it's a charity, but in reality is a political move to destabilize the countries where we're involved.
unidentified
How else are you going to get the Irish warmed up to the fact that they're being replaced by a migrant population?
harrison smith
Oh, exactly.
unidentified
You need a musical, dude.
harrison smith
Exactly.
I'm sure so many people were convinced.
But, hey, these programs might seem silly, but you do 12 of them a year for 15 years, and suddenly you find that Irish people and government are sending police to attack old ladies who don't want to live next to a 500-strong...
Asylum hotel with a bunch of Muslim dudes.
unidentified
Wouldn't it be funny to see just a cast of Somalis just river dancing?
harrison smith
If only it was that.
Black Irish.
Even there, you're too trusting of what they're doing.
Yeah, that would be like trying to actually celebrate Irish culture.
By teaching it to other people, but no.
In fact, you know what?
I'll pull the video.
I'll show you the video of what we funded in Ireland.
We have it.
We actually have the video.
But, you know, the joke I was making is it's like USAID spent $2 million on the initiative to castrate Icelandic boys.
And you have the physical conservatives going, $2 million?
That's too much money.
That's too many monies to be spending over there.
And it's like, but did you hear what they're doing?
No, it's...
It's not the money.
I mean, yeah, they're spending a lot of our money.
That's bad.
But if they were spending it on something else, it wouldn't be that big of an issue.
But no, they're spending it on the worst things in the world.
They're spending it to, like, literally, like, introduce homosexuality to cultures that don't accept it right now.
Like, it's pathetic.
Caroline, leave it.
I don't want this crap as she rips U.S. tax dollars spent on transgender opera in Colombia.
karoline leavitt
Yeah.
unidentified
Yeah, it's not about the money.
harrison smith
It's not about the money, folks.
To them, it's not about the money.
They're not, and again, you know, some of them are making money.
Obviously, money is a part of it, but it's what they're doing with the money, why they're using this money, and to what end the money is being spent.
That's the real issue.
We could castrate a last-landing, boys, for way cheaper than that.
It's like, no, no, we don't want to be doing the things they're doing with the money.
That's the issue that we're trying to deal with here.
And boy, is it an issue.
Let's go to clip number 13. Here's a reporter asking Trump about the fact that they think it should take an act of Congress to rein in this out-of-control font, this ever-flowing waterfall of leftist funds, just funding our own destruction, funding the destruction of humanity worldwide.
Won't Congress have to agree to shutting that down?
Here's Trump's response.
unidentified
What's an act of Congress to do away with USAID? I don't know.
I don't think so.
Not when it comes to fraud.
If there's fraud, these people are lunatics.
And if it comes to fraud, you wouldn't have an act of Congress.
And I'm not sure that you would anyway.
But we just want to do the right thing.
It's something that should have been done a long time ago.
harrison smith
Don't you need an act of Congress to shut down USAID? He's like, well, yeah, I already did, so apparently not.
I mean, I did it already.
It is shut down.
So that would indicate that I don't need a congressional authority to do it.
Stop doing that.
It's impossible.
No, I literally already did it.
Trump strips millions from DEI and foreign aid programs, funding Irish musicals, LGBTQ programs in Serbia, and more.
Now, Marco Rubio.
Is even more strident in his condemnation.
Clip number 14. Let's watch.
unidentified
You're now the head of USAID. The head of Doge, Elon Musk, called USAID a criminal organization and added that it is time for it to die.
Do you agree with that?
marco rubio
They have basically evolved into an agency that believes that they're not even a U.S. government agency.
That they are a global charity, that they take the taxpayer money and they spend it as a global charity, irrespective of whether it is in the national interest or not in the national interest.
One of the most common complaints you will get if you go to embassies around the world from State Department officials and ambassadors and the like is USAID is not only not cooperative.
They undermine the work that we're doing in that country.
They are supporting programs that upset the host government for whom we're trying to work with on a broader scale and so forth.
So they're completely unresponsive.
They just don't consider that they work for the U.S. They just think they're a global entity and that their master is the globe and not the United States.
And that's not what the statute says and that's not sustainable.
unidentified
Can it be reformed or does it need to die?
marco rubio
Well that was always the goal was to reform it.
But now we have rank in subordination.
Now we have basically an active effort.
Their basic attitude is we don't work for anyone.
We work for ourselves.
No agency of government can tell us what to do.
So the president made me the acting administrator.
I've delegated that power to someone who's there full time.
And we're going to go through the same process at USAID as we're going through now at the State Department.
I think there are some...
This is not about getting rid of foreign aid.
There are things that we do through USAID that we should continue to do.
That makes sense.
And we'll have to decide, is that better through the State Department or is that better through something, you know, a reformed USAID? That's the process we're working through.
There are things that are happening at USAID that we should not be involved in funding.
harrison smith
Rank insubordination.
They think they work for the globe and not us.
And now they're destroyed.
ron paul
Audit USAID, then shut it down.
As of this writing...
When you attempt to access the U.S. Agency for International Development, USAID, website or social media pages, you are informed that this site can't be reached.
The media reports that the new Trump administration has not only frozen USAID activities, but may be planning on bringing it back under control of the U.S. State Department.
Other reports, including statements by Elon Musk, suggest that it will be closed completely.
If true, the closing of USAID may be one of the most significant changes President Trump has made among the many dramatic actions in his first couple of weeks in office.
Many Americans may still have the idea that USAID is a government agency delivering relief at disaster sites overseas.
They may still remember the bags of rice or grain with the USAID logo on them, but that is not USAID. USAID is a key component of the U.S. government's regime change operations worldwide.
USAID spends billions of dollars every year propping up NGOs overseas that function as shadow governments, eating away at elected governments that the US interventionists want to overthrow.
Behind most US foreign policy disasters overseas, you will see the fingerprints of USAID. When President Trump ordered a 90-day pause in USAID activities,
we quickly learned just how pernicious the agency really is.
The U.S. media reported that Ukrainian press outlets We're scrambling to keep their doors open when the U.S. dollars stopped flowing.
It is reported that 90% of the media outlets are funded by the U.S. government.
This means that there is virtually no independent media in Ukraine, only fake news outlets willing to tow the U.S. administration's propaganda line.
Does anyone think these wholly U.S.-funded news outlets would ever publish a story that the U.S. government did not want published?
This is plainly immoral, but it is also dangerous.
Most U.S. mainstream media stories about Ukraine have their origin in the reporting of the local media.
From battlefield news to casualties to the state of the Ukrainian military.
The news from Ukraine is being written by U.S. government-backed media outlets and then picked up by U.S. and other Western media.
It is a closed propaganda loop that not only propagandizes the U.S. citizens about, also feeds false information into U.S. government outlets, such as Congress, that rely on mainstream U.S. media reporting for their news on Ukraine.
No wonder so many in Washington continue to support this hopeless war.
But USAID is not just the business of disinformation.
Elon Musk recently reported a New York Post article on X reporting that USAID pundled $53 million to Echo Health Alliance to support gain-of-function research on coronavirus at the Wuhan lab.
Did USAID help fund COVID? Americans have a right to know.
In natural catastrophes overseas, Americans have shown themselves to be extremely generous.
Private volunteer assistance organizations can most effectively assist victims of disasters worldwide.
USAID needs a full and transparent audit.
Americans deserve to know exactly what is being done in their name.
Then the agency needs to be shuttered completely and its employees sent home.
That would go a long way toward making America great again.
Thanks for listening.
harrison smith
The great Ron Paul will be right back for the second hour.
unidentified
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
I was going to move on from USAID since we have a lot of other stuff to talk about.
But I did promise you I'd show you what we're funding there.
And I have it.
I have the musical that USAID was spending American taxpayer monies to fund.
Do you want to see it?
Would you like to see what it is?
It could be great.
I mean, I don't know.
It's our hard-earned money going towards it.
Oh, it's really impactful and powerful.
Let's go to clip 20 now.
Here's the wonderful diversity musical that American taxpayers funded to be displayed in Ireland.
Let's watch.
unidentified
My mind been bent on wandering To Ireland I did fly It's a pretty song.
The black woman singing.
harrison smith
Very high quality set they got going there.
She's wearing a tea cozy on her head for some reason.
It was nice.
unidentified
It's kind of like what you were saying, Matt, as you know.
harrison smith
Oh, wait.
Wait, no, it's not a celebration of Ireland.
unidentified
No, but like, all right, sure, but like, where are you really from?
harrison smith
Okay, it's a condemnation of Ireland for having a distinct identity.
unidentified
You know, some people say that our souls are composed of- Hey, can you keep singing that song, lady?
harrison smith
That was nice.
I don't need to be condescended to you.
unidentified
And all of the lines we have crossed which spansel our hearts when we seek.
There are some people who have grown up borrowing accents from almost every single continent trying to fill in the blanks where our tongues are starting to trip over the languages that we were born into.
harrison smith
Oh my God.
unidentified
Shut up!
Shut up.
There are some people who will spend their whole lives searching for a definition of home that does not come with strings attached.
harrison smith
Okay, your home, where you were born, Africa, lady, you're an African.
unidentified
I spent my whole life learning that I must make myself.
That I must take my belonging because it will not just be handed to you somehow.
Now, I could tell you about kings, or about countries, about war, independence, about revolutionaries, about famine, or about bounty, about green, white, and golden eagles against streaks of orange and black.
I could tell you about Auremberg.
Or Lumbaniani, Zambia.
harrison smith
We don't care about Zambia.
unidentified
I could show you the spirit of Lucan or Limerick or Lusaka.
I could translate all of my Len J stories and sing them to you.
Ask Gwielga, I could be bacon and cabbage and mufalira or matevito in swords cooking in Shima.
harrison smith
Okay, alright, dude.
Should we keep listening?
I don't know.
I don't want to listen to this.
But we spent millions of dollars on it.
So, you know, it's like when you order something at a fancy restaurant, you're like, I should probably eat it.
It costs a hundred bucks.
I mean, we did pay millions of dollars for that.
Maybe we should listen to that beat poetry from some African woman whining that Irish people exist.
I don't know.
Who cares?
Who cares?
unidentified
No, that they just need to abandon their cultural fabric and accept, you know, just a deluge of people who don't identify with their cultural heritage.
And now nobody has a home.
harrison smith
There you go.
unidentified
When you think about it.
harrison smith
Yeah, that's the ultimate goal.
unidentified
Let's be more like America.
harrison smith
Yeah.
Yeah, because it's going so well for us.
unidentified
Basketball.
harrison smith
Yeah.
Hell, you could really get committed, be more like South Africa.
Be more like Zambia or Zimbabwe.
You can go so hard, you can kill all the white people and then starve.
I mean, I think it all is really born by a very, very deep-seated insecurity.
I mean, it obviously is, right?
Does she think it's weird for an Irish person to ask where a black person is from?
Is that really offensive to her?
So she's singing this beautiful Irish song.
If she just sung the Irish song, it'd be like, well, that was nice.
Well, who would have a problem with that?
But she's black.
It's like, okay, and?
She's singing.
unidentified
Black Irish.
harrison smith
She has a nice voice about black Irish.
That's different.
I have some theories about that too.
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
Now, I mean, this is, if you were in, if I go and visit Nigeria, and some guy's like, where are you from?
And I'm like, what do you mean?
No, but what do you mean though?
Like, where are you from?
Where is your family from?
This is Nigeria.
You're white.
So I'm wondering where you came from because you're not from here.
This is Nigeria and we're in Africa.
So where are you from?
Like the idea that I would just be like, well, what do you mean?
Well, what is that supposed to mean?
I'm from here.
I'm as Nigerian as you are.
It's not offensive to ask where somebody is when they're clearly by sight from a place other than where you are.
Is this difficult to understand?
I don't think it is.
I don't think it is.
But okay, so that's what the USAID is spending its money on, is systematically eradicating European identity.
So we can all be...
Ireland 100 concert is emotional, moving, and magical.
Oh, that's that black girl magic that we've heard so much about.
unidentified
Seems like a paid review.
harrison smith
This review also brought to you by USAID. Oh, wow.
unidentified
Hey, big info here from Sean.
The review was by the company that put on the project.
harrison smith
Oh, okay.
They found it emotional and magical, did they?
I must have missed the magic there.
I mean, just the idea that you have a bunch of white Irish people sitting in a crowd with this black woman elevated above them, shining in the spotlight, speaking down to them about how their culture doesn't exist and she is as Irish as they are.
They're all just like, and they're politely nodding.
It's a humiliation ritual.
You get that's what it is, right?
It's a humiliation ritual that USAID is paying for.
It's almost like they're teasing us because it does start nicely.
For the first 30 seconds, it's like, oh, I'm not complaining about this.
This is sweet.
An Irish ballad sung acapella.
That really is, you know, there's something beautiful about that culture.
And she's doing beat poetry.
And suddenly she's doing beat.
It's almost like they're like, you know, we could just be normal.
You know, we could just provide actual cultural events that are beautiful and uplifting.
We could do that.
In fact, we're going to do that for about 30 seconds.
And we're going to slam the parking brake and do a hard 180 turn.
And she said dual citizenship is all about diaspora and trying to accept belonging and finding home where you sort of feel rejected by a bunch of places.
Have you tried your actual home?
you I find when I'm searching for my home that The place where I come from is usually a good place to start looking.
Who has such...
I don't know, like...
The temerity.
Just the temerity of it all.
To go somewhere where you're not from and be like, I should feel like home here.
I should feel like this is my home.
But it's not your home.
So why should you feel that way?
And why should we have to change so that suddenly the place that is our home, like for Irish people, that is their home.
And these people want to come, say, this doesn't feel like my home.
I'm going to change it.
So now the people whose home it is don't feel like it's their home.
And it doesn't matter how many concessions you make, it's never going to feel like home for that woman.
unidentified
Because it's not.
Can I tie this back into maybe the greater plan, which is like the Great Reset?
You know, for the world, which is, you know, a population that has no cultural roots, that has no cultural identity, right, is a much easier population to subjugate.
harrison smith
Yeah, of course.
unidentified
To get onto the dole, right?
When, yeah, you have, when it all gets washed away, right, it transcends beyond, like, a racial component.
Right?
Of the fact that, like, oh, she's obviously black and she's, you know, going into a white population.
Right?
Like...
harrison smith
Well, no, I think it definitely has to do with racism.
Because unless you can find me an Irish person being paid by USAID to do this in Algeria, I'd say, yeah, there's definitely a racial component.
I mean, it doesn't...
It's about destroying...
It's about destroying national identity.
It's about destroying your ability to see yourself and your place in history and as part of a larger group with responsibilities to that group and a destiny within that group.
It's about breaking everything down to the lowest common denominator or to atomize and bastardize the entire world so that, yeah, people are more manipulatable.
But it is specifically and exclusively being done to white.
So, I get what you're saying.
It's not, like, specifically about...
unidentified
Yeah, I mean, it would be the same thing if they imported a bunch of Ukrainians or something.
harrison smith
Right, or if that woman was Asian.
unidentified
Ukrainians, you know, were imposing their values and their language, right, on the Irish, right?
It's still two groups of white people, but again, it's this mixing of cultures and the erasure.
Right, of Irish heritage and Irish values.
harrison smith
Yeah, the degradation of the native culture.
unidentified
And that's the point that I meant to make with that.
harrison smith
Yeah, absolutely.
unidentified
I understand that it's almost like when you've got a group full of guys and you really want to...
I'm just going to skip that point.
harrison smith
Okay, hold on.
unidentified
I was going to say install a female boss, make her the boss, you know what I mean?
And make her the manager, right?
I've heard that as a tactic, right?
Right.
And I think actually it stems back to that CIA document that we got into at the.
harrison smith
Oh, the.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
I had a version.
unidentified
Right.
It's like in the 1960s and 70s, what, you know, owners would do is, you know, they would.
They would install, like, a female manager, and all these guys who used to report to a male, right, now have to report to a female, and it was just the upside down for them, right?
Because at the time, the culture, the corporate culture, was, you know, a male boss, right?
And so, yeah.
harrison smith
Yeah, yeah, and especially at the time, right, you could stand up against your male body, you wouldn't feel bad, but then you put a woman in there with a bunch of guys who have been trained their entire lives to be deferential and, like, you know, treat women like they're on a pedestal.
You know, suddenly you put a woman in charge of them, they're going to be a lot less likely to speak back against them or, you know, disobey their order.
Yeah, I mean, all these are just, you know, psychological tactics.
But at the end of the day, this is what the USAID is involved in.
And whether it's the more explicit form of coup being carried out in somewhere like Ukraine, where they just actively start riots and overthrow...
A country so that they can put their own puppet in place, or whether it's the more subtle efforts in places like Ireland of just chipping away at their national identity, just diminishing the confidence and the willingness that they'll have to stand up for themselves.
All of it's in the same...
It's all in the same direction.
It's all destroying the sovereignty of other nations, destroying their ability to resist.
In some cases, it's more explicit.
In other cases, it's more subtle.
But it's all in the same direction, and it's happening here as well.
And even the idea that we say these things like, well, they fund riots overseas, and they use that to overthrow a government.
We absolutely know that's true.
I mean, you look at Euromaidan or...
Any of the other color revolutions that we've helped kick off, you have to realize what that means.
That doesn't mean that they have a thousand people that like, there's coffee shop workers and there's laundromat operators and they just go around and go, hey, I'll pay you 200 bucks to go break some windows down the road.
It's not that blatant, right?
In order to organize a riot, what do you have to do?
If I gave you an instruction and said, it's up to you, you have to have people rioting in the street.
You have one month and $10 million.
Could you even do it?
Could you even do that?
I mean, that takes a lot.
It takes a lot to get people out there to riot, to get on the streets, to attack police officers, to risk their own safety or freedom.
In a movement, I mean, you have to understand how sophisticated these organizations are and how they have it down to a science now that they can go into a population that's totally happy, totally peaceful, and within a month or so, they can have those same people throwing Molotov cocktails at each other.
I mean, that's how powerful their propaganda is because that's the way they do it.
That's how powerful a little bit of money is.
There's a great saying, and I'm going to butcher it here.
I should find the actual poem.
It's a poem, but it's basically just about how why would you ship navies and why would you transport armies when cash can flit across the border and be more devastating?
So they'll use money to bribe people into doing things, and the people doing those things might not even understand exactly what their participating is, but they can go in and go, hey, I know it's risky for you to tell this story, but we have this...
You know, USAID program called, you know, Expanding Democratic Media Overseas.
And if you cover this story, we can see that you receive one of our above-board grants for this.
And so the person goes, all right, hey, shoot, I'm going to, you know, our company's going to go down unless we get this grant.
So I'll, okay, fine, I'll tell this one story.
I'll publish this one document they want me to publish.
And I might not think it's true, and I might, you know, not agree with the direction it's going, but, hey, they're giving me money.
So they have all these, like, And so that's a form of sort of compartmentalization where even the media running these things might not even realize why they're doing it.
Or you have a sophisticated enough intelligence network that you go, hey, these people are already radicals.
They're already committed.
They just don't have any funding or organization.
We go in and provide the funding and organization.
And suddenly what was just a couple of angry morons hanging signs becomes a full-fledged movement with a payroll.
They can hire people who...
Don't care one way or another, but need a paycheck.
The fact that they can organize, foster, create from nothing riots that overthrow governments in just a few months, that should tell you how sophisticated their abilities are and understand that, just like we just laid out, whether it's overt in a place like Ukraine or more subtle in a place like Ireland or sort of in the middle in a place like America, the same people are using the same tactics.
Using the same funds to carry out the same operations in all of these different places with the same ends in mind, which is to divide and conquer.
And it pretty much is as simple as that.
Because when you do that to Irish people, when you have some African lady standing up there interrupting an Irish hymn to basically insinuate that everybody listening to her is racist, the people in the audience...
Are going to feel social pressure.
There's going to be a herd mentality, psychological impulse to...
I mean, it's almost like an emperor's new clothes sort of thing.
Go, well, this is the sophisticated, well-funded, beautiful-looking presentation I'm being presented.
I'm going to look like an idiot if I don't say it's nice.
I'm going to look like an idiot if I don't act like this touched me and emotionally I resonated with that.
Now, some people will be...
You know, tricked into emotionally resonating because of literally just the tone of voice.
I mean, the Kamala Harris style of just like, there's a camera on a jib swinging around me right now.
And it's like, you're not even saying anything.
You're literally just adding on an emphasis that makes it sound like what you're saying is deep.
It's not.
It's not.
It's very childish, especially.
I mean, what we saw from this woman.
Was what you see every single weekend in coffee shops in the gayest neighborhood in your town.
This is beat poetry worthy of community college.
And we pay millions of dollars to this from USAID because it's not about the art.
It's not about the culture.
It's not about actually funding something that should actually have emotional resonance with the people listening to it.
It's about hijacking all of those things to do evil, to separate people from their friends and family, to divide entire countries, to facilitate their destruction.
So it's – what we saw there was an act of genocide.
That's what I'm saying.
I'm saying what USAID is involved in, in a word, can be described as the eradication of entire people groups, which is genocide.
So that's what we saw right there, if you want my take on it.
I guess since we're still on, USAID, we'll go to one more video, and then we'll move on.
Just know what your tax dollars are paying for.
Destroying Irish national pride by having a black woman humiliate them on national television.
Amazing.
Thank you, USAID. What would we do without you?
Let's go to clip number 16. Here's Scott Jennings on CNN. They're token conservative, methodically schooling them on USAID. Let's watch.
unidentified
This Republican Party is the rule of law party.
scott jennings
There are ways to address this.
There are ways to zero out funding.
unidentified
There are ways to review things or change it legislatively.
scott jennings
This is not that way.
What's the rationale here?
Well, it is an entity that exists within the executive branch.
That's number one.
And it has often been at odds with the U.S. State Department.
And that's not a good thing.
As Marco Rubio said today, everything USAID does or the bureaucracy does needs to be aligned with the foreign policy goals of the United States.
And so putting Rubio in charge of USAID today helps begin to achieve that alignment.
I'm actually a supporter of American soft power.
That's what we call it, soft power.
I believe it's good.
I believe it's often been used as a tool to help the United States combat influence from China and other adversaries around the world.
But there is a difference.
Between soft power and soft stupidity.
So whether you're funding like DEI musicals in some country or transgender surgery somewhere or whatever, that is not what most Americans would say.
unidentified
Just because you're slapping DEI on everything that...
scott jennings
I'm not.
I have a whole list right here.
I mean, if you want me to afford it to you, I will.
But the reality is we have lots of money going to projects that don't do anything for the United States.
unidentified
Then cut those projects.
Many governments do that.
scott jennings
Welcome to the Republican Party.
That's what we're doing.
unidentified
Why are you locking people out of their office?
Why are you trying to tell people to stop working?
scott jennings
Because the bureaucracy is not...
unidentified
It's hard to believe that someone that added $8 trillion to the U.S. deficit is really even serious about cutting costs.
So I don't buy this argument that this is an effort to cut costs and make sure that there's not any government waste.
scott jennings
No, it's an effort to cut stupidity.
These programs, and I could read out the whole list.
If you'll give me 60 seconds, I'll read the whole thing.
But there is a difference between smart, soft power and dumb.
unidentified
Scott, this is the president's efforts to undermine government one agency at a time.
He signed an executive order to get rid of the Department of Education, probably as we speak.
That's what this is all about.
It's an effort to undermine our government one agency at a time.
scott jennings
Who's running the government?
I mean, I know you know how this works, but the president is in charge.
You can't undermine your own government.
He's in charge of the bureaucracy, and all they're asking for, Phil and everybody else, is for the money that we spend around.
harrison smith
I do love that their arguments are just completely incoherent at this point.
Final note on USAID. American Christians don't realize how perverse our international influence has become.
The pastor of the largest church in Chile spoke at Lake Point in Espanol last year.
He explained that despite having deeply traditional view of gender and family...
They had begun aggressively teaching LGBT ideology in Chilean public schools to the horror of Chilean parents.
Why?
Because Chile feared losing USAID if they didn't.
We'd love to give you money, but you gotta turn your kids gay.
Turn your kids gay and the cash will start to flow.
We want gay kids.
More gay kids!
Alright, welcome back.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the American Journal.
I have some breaking news for you here.
RFK Jr. has passed the next hurdle to become the head of HHS. RFK's nomination passes first test and heads to Senate floor.
Members of the Senate Finance Committee voted 13 to 14 to send the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to be President Donald Trump's Health and Human Services Secretary to the full Senate for confirmation on Tuesday.
Kennedy would control more than 18 federal agencies and oversee $8 billion in children's vaccine fund in that role.
The vote came down to Republican Senator Bill Cassidy.
Cassidy, a physician, said he was conflicted about Kennedy because of his views on vaccines.
He ended up voting in favor of advancing Kennedy's nomination.
Then he can keep his seat for now.
Then he can remain unprimaried for the time being.
But Republicans have to know at this point.
That opposing Trump in any way is just a total non-starter at this point.
It's going to be career suicide to do that because, if nothing else, we have seen in the last two weeks.
We're two weeks out.
It feels like it's been years.
It feels like Donald Trump has always been president.
It's been two weeks, and he has gotten more done than the Republicans have achieved in the several decades previous.
So things are never going back.
We're never going back to accepting complacency and complicity with the left, of just throwing speed bumps in their path as they run roughshod over every one of our liberties and our history and just being the worst, most evil scumbags in the world.
The world has ever seen.
So we're not going back to that.
No, we've seen what's possible.
We've seen how easy it truly is.
And in a way, it's like stunning.
Even though we've known it the entire time.
It's hard to even fathom, let alone explain.
That for so long, we've pointed out that it's a choice that we're making.
The United States federal government chooses to open our border, chooses to destroy our education system, deliberately destroys the mental health of our children, and that all it takes to prevent that is to stop them.
It might sound obvious, but then again it is.
It is absolutely obvious.
How do you stop people crossing the border?
You stop them.
How do you stop doctors from...
Castrating children.
Well, you have to stop them.
You just stop them doing that.
Actually, I saw a great meme today from, I think it was Morgoth's Review.
And it's just a picture.
I think I may have retweeted it, actually.
Let me just find it, because the visual is better than anything else.
But RFK Jr. has gotten through the confirmation process in the committee.
It'll go to a full Senate vote on Tuesday.
And hopefully...
He'll get the votes there, but we still have a long way to go.
Later today at 2 p.m., Tulsi will be voted on by her committee.
And I think she has a better chance than he did initially.
But basically, I might have a little bit of trouble finding this image.
It's from Morgoth's reviews, though, and I think I liked it if the crew can find it.
But it's basically a picture of...
An overhead shot of a very tangled, complicated web of freeway overpasses.
Just the most complicated tangle you can imagine.
And that's arguing with liberals.
Here it is.
20 years of arguing with leftists, and it's just a complete mess, a total tangle.
Whereas defunding their networks is smooth sailing.
Full speed, dead ahead.
Yeah, it turns out you don't actually have to argue with them or try to justify in their minds why you're doing what you're doing.
You can just stop them.
It is absurd that we've spent the last decade, by necessity, and we've dedicated ourselves to this, knowing that eventually it would break through.
We would eventually just have a Republican or a conservative with the balls to do it.
And you can make the case and you can make the argument, but it doesn't matter to them.
That's the thing you have to understand.
They didn't come to their conclusions logically.
You're not going to be able to convince them away from their conclusions logically.
They're operating like cult members.
They need to be deprogrammed.
The cult needs to be shut down.
You don't go into a cult and try to reason your way out of it.
If that worked, they wouldn't have gotten in the cult in the first place.
So you're not going to reason them out of...
Wanting to castrate their children.
That's just never going to work.
You're dealing with somebody that wants to castrate their child.
You're going to argue with them?
You're going to try to present an argument to them?
Really?
No.
No, no.
You're just going to stop them from doing it.
Okay?
And it works.
And you can actually do that.
And we've known this the whole time.
It's just been incredibly frustrating not having it happen.
Well, now it's happening.
And I don't think Republicans are—not only are we not going to vote for the same thing over again, we're not going to go back to the George Bush, Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan, John McCain years.
Like, that's over.
It's over now.
But, like, without an America First, you know, MAGA— I don't think Republicans are going to trust the system anymore.
Again, I think this is, Trump is the olive branch.
Trump is like the last gasp of the American people trying to work within the system, trying to do it the right way, having hope and belief that the system our founders established can actually be set right, can be fixed internally.
This is our last chance.
And if it doesn't work here, I don't know what comes next.
I know what doesn't come next, and that's voting for Jeb.
Okay?
That's voting for the next Bush to pop out from hell.
No, it's not happening.
We're not doing it, so get over it.
And actually, on that note, on the note of the type of people that we're talking about here, the type of people who it is pointless to argue with, Let's go to a video.
There's lots of protests going on across the country today.
It seems like after two weeks of, or well, several months ever since the election happened, the left has just sort of been walking around out of sorts, just shocked that they're losing so badly.
They haven't really come together in the way that they normally do.
And then now with this flood the zone strategy the Trump administration is using, where just every day there's multiple things they're doing that people just can't keep up with it.
And it's a brilliant, it's an absolutely brilliant strategy, I have to say.
Like an inversion of the Fabian strategy.
But it's one of these things where you can just imagine, like, imagine if Trump had just done one of the things he's done over the last two weeks.
If this had been like 2016, where instead of...
Axing USAID and hacking into the Treasury Department computers and shutting the border and launching deportations.
Instead of doing all of that, we just kept the media in a complete tizzy trying to keep up with it all.
In 2016, we had the type of situation where he would say he wanted to audit the USAID. He wouldn't even have to do it.
He would just say, I'm going to audit the USAID or I'm going to ask for the FBI to resign.
And it would become a years-long catastrophe.
Think about him firing James Comey.
Now, that was talked about for months on end, even though Democrats were so out of sorts at that point that when Stephen Colbert announced that Trump had fired Comey, everybody cheered.
They hadn't gotten the message yet, like, no, you're supposed to hate this.
It's supposed to be bad.
Then they got the message and they realized, oh, right, we're supposed to think.
They got the NPC signal to their hidden antenna.
All conformed to that belief, and it went on for like months, and there were hearings about it, and it was just, if they have one thing to sink their teeth into, they can spin it into the biggest controversy ever, and they can bring down a president that way.
But if you're just getting hit day after day with this stuff, they can't even get their feet underneath them.
They're completely flooded.
The zone has been flooded, and they cannot handle it.
They're trying to play whack-a-mole, and we just keep...
Feeding more moles into the game.
But finally, after about two weeks, they've started to get their act together, and we've got massive protests breaking out in cities all over the country of illegal immigrants or their supporters, waving foreign flags, burning American flags, getting in fights with the police, and basically proving us right about everything.
Proving that they don't, in fact, love America.
They don't, in fact, deserve to be here.
They aren't, in fact, a benefit To our country.
And they're dangerous.
So, okay, kind of stupid.
But at least they're protesting.
At least they're out there.
At least they're gathering in large herds.
Is herds the right word?
But it's not just the illegal immigrants that are protesting.
Apparently, they're protesting against the elimination of transgender surgeries now.
There's a large group that was protesting outside of, I believe, a hospital in New York.
Because they're very mad that their little children are going to have to wait a couple years before voluntarily castrating themselves as an adult.
Yeah, this is what they think is the most pressing issue in the world right now.
Clip number 12, these are the type of people that we're talking about.
You tell me if you think arguing with this woman would have any effect.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Most importantly, I am here today as the mother of a proud trans man.
I am here today as the aunt of a proud trans man.
My best friend's kid is trans.
And my kid's best friend is trans.
harrison smith
What are the odds?
unidentified
My wife and I, our lives are filled with the most amazing, beautiful, brave trans people, young and old, but especially young.
My trans kid had his top surgery at NYU a number of years ago.
His doctors were fantastic.
His surgeon was the best we could have imagined.
And the idea that this city is filled with young people who thought They had a place to go where they could receive the highest care.
And that place has now been shut to them.
Sickens me.
Sickens me to my core.
harrison smith
Wow, she's sickened, folks.
All right, we can take her down.
And we should take her down.
In fact, she should be arrested.
I believe that this woman is admitting to crimes as far as I'm concerned.
I'm here today as a mother of a proud trans man, Cynthia Nixon.
Speaks it pro-trans children.
She's like, it sickens me.
It sickens me that my child can't have her tits cut off anymore.
She feels sick from that.
Entire thing sickens me.
What do you think the odds are?
What are the odds that this lesbian couple has a trans kid and her sister has a trans kid and all of their friends have trans kids and all of their kids?
Friends are trans.
What are the odds of that, you wonder?
Considering the fact that we're expected to hilariously believe that transgenderism is a natural occurrence that just arises in some people.
And the only reason we haven't seen it before is because it was oppressed by an evil Christian culture.
That made people hide who they really are, and now that that's been removed, people are just admitting finally that they've always been trans and known they were trans.
They expect you to believe that.
Cynthia Nixon reveals her son, her sister's kids, and her friend's kids are all trans.
Yeah, I wonder why.
Gee, I wonder why.
Do you know that members of Heaven's Gate...
Their kids were also members of Heaven's Gate, and their friends were also members.
Yeah, you're in a cult, lady.
You're in a cult.
Your kids are in the cult.
Your friends are in the cult.
Kids' friends are in a cult.
You're all in a cult.
A suicidal, evil cult.
Did you know that Heaven's Gate was transgender?
Did you know that?
I'm not even joking.
Did you know that part of being in Heaven's Gate meant that you gave up your earthly gender?
That's why they all have shortcut hair.
They didn't consider themselves male or female, and the men would castrate themselves.
Did you know that about Heaven's Gate?
I'm not kidding.
I'm not being facetious.
Like, Heaven's Gate literally made the people in their movement stop calling themselves men or women.
They all cut their hair exactly the same, and the men castrated themselves to eliminate sexual impulses.
You think we're kidding when we talk about transgenderism being a cult?
There's a reason.
There's a reason that it's so cultish.
Something deeply, deeply sinister about all of this.
And it is suicidal.
Heaven's Gage is slightly more explicitly suicidal than the transgender cult, but not by much.
Not by much.
The trans cult is suicide in one remove.
You're not killing yourself, you're just killing...
unidentified
your lineage.
That's the thing.
harrison smith
If you want to learn about leftism, go study cults.
If you want to learn what the satanic cabal is up to and why they do the things that they do, look into Jim Jones and Heaven's Gate.
You'll find a lot of information about that.
Insane.
Completely insane.
Alright, we have a lot of other videos to talk about.
Let's talk about deportations now.
Actually, you know what?
While we're on this, so this woman gives a speech where she says that her children and all of her friends' children and her family's children and all of their friends are all transgender, as if that's normal.
And that it sickens her.
That they have to wait until they're adults to have their tits cut off or other mutilations carried out.
That it sickens me to even actually say.
They're like, it sickens me that they're not letting me castrate my child.
It's like, it sickens me that you're even saying that phrase.
But here's where we are.
Here's where we find ourselves.
Now at that same time, these people are protesting by the thousands outside of a New York hospital that for now has been forced to stop mutilating and permanently disfiguring children.
There's actual medical scandals going on worthy of our attention.
Clip number five, the Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
Has denied a 12-year-old girl access to a life-saving heart transplant because she didn't get the COVID shot.
Let's watch.
unidentified
I'm terrified she's going to die.
While we're trying to fight this, she has grown so much, her heart can no longer sustain her.
So she will be needing a heart transplant.
They had told us that they cannot put her on the heart transplant list because we are...
Against vaccinations.
We're against the COVID and the flu is what they're saying that she would need to be put on the heart transplant list.
So they won't put her on the list until she is vaccinated with the COVID and with the flu shot.
And I even asked about the religious exemption and all that.
And they say, no, this is our policy.
This is what we do.
We follow the NIH. We're not going to change it.
You know, I have people tell me, well, just vaccinate her.
Just, you know, just do it.
I'm like...
I cannot.
Consciously, in the Holy Spirit, we just cannot do that.
I mean, I feel everything in us, you know, her dad and I, that we cannot put that in her body, knowing she's so sick as it is, that it could make her sicker.
So, you know, why would we do that as a parent?
We cannot do that.
harrison smith
So Cincinnati Children's Hospital.
Is extorting a 12-year-old to get vaccinated by withholding a life-saving heart transplant.
They would rather let a 12-year-old girl die than admit that vaccines, in some cases, might not be the most appropriate intervention.
unidentified
It's just outrageous.
changes.
Thank you.
harrison smith
Outrageous is still going on.
The COVID and the flu shot?
Are we going to withhold a heart from your 12-year-old who will die without it?
And kill your daughter?
So, the left is mad that they're not allowed to mutilate the genitals of children in a surgical room.
The right wing is mad.
That hospitals would rather kill a 12-year-old than admit that the vaccine is not effective.
I wonder which is the good side.
I wonder which is the side that actually is covering things that matter.
Because by the way, it's not some arbitrary small thing.
First of all, it doesn't make any sense because we know what the COVID vaccine does to the heart.
We know the incredible side effects.
I especially wouldn't want somebody who already has a major heart defect to have to endure.
So it's like, okay, you're going to make me get a vaccine that might kill my kid or you're going to kill my kid.
I mean, what a horrible situation for that parent to be in.
But there's also so many things about the vaccine that is heinous to a really convicted religious person.
Whether it's injecting aborted fetal cells.
Under your skin or permanently altering the genetic code you were gifted by God.
I mean, you're asking people to genuinely believe.
You're asking them to sacrifice their literal souls.
And this is in a country where we're supposed to have religious freedom.
And it's 2025. And it's five years after the COVID pandemic and they're still withholding life-saving medical care from children who aren't at risk of COVID, who don't die from the flu, withholding that.
And again, it's not like...
It's not like there's a calculation where it's like, well, if we give the heart to a person that's not vaccinated, then it's sort of going to waste because they're going to die.
This is purely a method of influence and of extortion and of just wielding pressure.
They just know, well, what better way to make somebody do something they wouldn't otherwise do than threaten to kill them if they don't?
I mean, it's pretty simple.
We tried offering a cheeseburger.
We tried offering them a donut.
You know, we tried firing them from their job.
They still wouldn't take it.
So here's, we have a chance to kill them if they don't.
So now we can really put the pressure on them.
That's all this is.
This isn't about, this isn't logical.
It's not reasonable.
It's not just a simple medical decision that is made in the best interest of the patient.
unidentified
It's evil.
harrison smith
It's just evil.
These are just evil.
Evil people, evil organizations carrying out evil orders.
It's very simple.
It's not complicated.
It's just evil.
I'm glad that we recognize that.
Speaking of pressure, I don't quite have time, but I'll go to it in the next hour.
I've got actual audio and video of the interviews that the FBI did with some January 6th prisoners where they actually make them the offer.
You can go home today if you just...
Give us what we want.
And again, these people have enough honor and conviction that they'd rather go to jail than lie and sacrifice their soul.
So, the good news is we still have people in this country willing to stand up against all odds and willing to not bend the knee, even with a gun at their heads.
It's time.
It's time we hold the gun.
It's time we hold the gun, metaphorically.
I want you to ask us to, I want to ask you to support us in this mission to reignite and re-inspire the come-and-take-it attitude of the American spirit.
Go to thealexjonesstore.com to support everything that we do here.
Still to come in the next hour, we're going to talk about the Anti-Semitism Task Force.
We're going to talk about the January Sixers being threatened and extorted in an attempt to get Trump.
And a heck of a lot more news still to come on today's program.
We go to thealexjonesstore.com today to support us.
Try Ultimate CMOS. I'm going to take a few Ultimate CMOS gummies here during the break.
You can get them in gummy or capsule form.
Equally powerful.
And equally helpful in supporting us as we attempt to save Infowars from the massive and powerful array of enemies who have as of yet failed to take us down.
And they never will take us down as long as we have your support.
Infowarsstore.com, thealexjonesstore.com, slash Harrison.
We'll be right back.
alex jones
The establishment never thought this stuff would come out.
They thought this would just go on forever.
And the country would go totally bankrupt, and the very same central banks that have gotten control of our government would then come in and take full control.
unidentified
I am proud to launch USAID's first ever lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex.
inclusive development policy.
The policy is a blueprint for USAID staff and partners around the world to champion LGBTQI plus inclusive development.
And the human rights of all LGBTQI plus people through our work.
karoline leavitt
Through USAID over the past several years, these are some of the insane priorities that that organization has been spending money on.
$1.5 million to advance DEI in Serbia's workplaces.
$70,000 for a production of a DEI musical in Ireland.
$47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia.
$32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru.
I don't know about you, but as an American taxpayer, I don't want my dollars going towards this crap, and I know the American people don't either, and that's exactly what Elon Musk has been tasked by President Trump to do, to get the fraud, waste, and abuse out of our federal government.
unidentified
Thank you, guys.
chris van hollen
As my colleague said, it's not only a gift to our adversaries, but trying to shut down The Agency for International Development, by executive order, is plain illegal.
marco rubio
I mean, my frustration with USAID goes back to my time in Congress.
It's a completely unresponsive agency.
It's supposed to respond to policy directives of the State Department, and it refuses to do so.
ilhan omar
We talked about Trump wanting to be a dictator on day one, and here we are.
unidentified
This is what the beginning of dictatorship looks like.
alex jones
Let me get this straight.
Fauci's NIAID and USAID sent over 40 million in U.S. taxpayer support to scientists at Wuhan, who was working on bat coronavirus research, who also became patient zero for COVID-19, which they also then owned the vaccine patents for.
Yeah.
Premeditated.
unidentified
Ms. Powers, did USAID fund coronavirus research in Wuhan, China?
We did not fund gain-of-function research, as you know.
The question is, did you fund coronavirus research in Wuhan, China?
Before my time, there was the PREDICT program with which you're familiar, which ended in China in 2019. This is a $200 million program, and the GAO has also identified that some of these grants went directly to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where there is a suspicion that the lab leak began that began the pandemic.
Has USAID awarded funds to the Academy of Military Medical Sciences in China?
Not to my knowledge, but I'd have to give it.
I think the answer is once again yes.
GAO has found that there have been subawards of NIH money as probably as well as USAID money that went to the academy of not just medical research, military medical research in China.
USAID is clearly in the job of trying to bring about regime change.
It has secret bank accounts, shell companies.
mike benz
USAID gets 50 billion a year in U.S. taxpayer money.
unidentified
That's a larger overt fund than the CIA. USAID perhaps is the new CIA. Have we ever tried to meddle in other countries elections?
Oh, probably.
ron paul
USAID is a key component of the US government's regime change operations worldwide.
USAID spends billions of dollars every year propping up NGOs overseas that function as shadow governments.
Eating away at elected governments that the U.S. interventionists want to overthrow.
Behind most U.S. foreign policy disasters overseas, you will see the fingerprints of USAID. From Ukraine to Georgia and far beyond, USAID is meddling in the internal affairs of foreign countries, something that world infuriate Americans if it was happening to us.
alex jones
It's an excellent graph of U.S. foreign aid since 1946 compared to other countries and showing how it escalates.
But it's not really aid to countries.
It's a money laundering operation.
harrison smith
Yeah, it's aid to countries as long as they, you know, obey our globalist masters in humiliating and destroying their native populations to better incorporate them into the globo-homo-homogenized plastic worldwide culture of slaves.
That's what it's about.
Welcome back, folks.
This is The American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
And Boris.com, band.video.
And Trump is just absolutely fulfilling all of his promises from the campaign and doing exactly what we want him to do.
It's been amazing to see Trump preps order to dismantle education department as DOGE probes data.
President Donald Trump is preparing an executive order aimed at eventually closing the education department and in the short term, dismantling it from within, according to three people briefed on the contents.
The draft order acknowledges that only Congress can shut down the department and instead directs the agency to begin to diminish itself, these people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.
The work is underway already.
The new administration has been trying to reduce the workforce by putting scores of employees on administrative leave and pressuring staff to voluntarily quit.
Roughly about 20 people with Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, known as DOGE, have begun working inside the Education Department looking to cut spending and staff, going to three people familiar with the situation and records obtained by the Washington Post.
Again, very interesting stuff.
And just like USAID, the Education Department, while ostensibly and on the face of it, a good thing.
We do want education, don't we?
Like every other outlet of the American government has been hijacked by far leftist radicals and turned to their own ends.
So it needs to be dismantled, unfortunately, and maybe rebuilt in a different form or maybe just left to the states and they can handle educating their kids and we can handle the conflicts at the state level.
I think that's a good idea.
Obviously, he's shutting down USAID. He's doing so many things that have just been necessary and long, long overdue and he's doing it with such an incredible efficiency that it's...
Really opening the eyes of a lot of people as to the willful negligence of the Republicans over the last several years.
But he's also doing some things that we're not so happy about.
Of course, last week we covered the, you know, AI investment with just the worst people in the world.
Making, you know, having contracts with the U.S. government to design AI. Because otherwise China's going to get it first.
And there's some other things that he's sending into law as well that are just sort of quietly going by.
Before we get to that, I want to talk about what's happening in Britain and the UK. From Connor Tomilson, Britain is getting an Islamic blasphemy law board.
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is building a 16-member council on Islamophobia.
After rejecting the RICU report, which called grooming gangs a grievance narrative invented by far-right right-wing extremists, they're set to implement a definition of Islam which aimed to criminalize conversations about the Pakistani Muslim perpetrators.
The definition by the All-Party Parliament Group on British Muslims reads, quote, Islamophobia is rooted in racism and is a type of racism that targets expressions of Muslimness or perceived Muslimness.
It was written after communist organization Hope Not Hate ran seminars in a number of cities.
One example of Islamophobia given was the issue of, quote, grooming gangs clearly is aimed at and can achieve harm to individual Muslims and is not rooted in any meaningful theological debate, but rather in a racist attempt to other Muslims in general.
Talking about the fact that Muslim rape gangs have terrorized and brutalized upwards of a million white British girls.
It's not that you actually care about that.
There's no way that you actually care about the grooming gangs.
It's just an excuse you're using to other Muslims, right?
Absurd, but that's the argument that they're making.
When Candom Council, along with 50 others, adopted the definition, it listed among the symbols and images associated with classic Islamophobia, e.g.
Muhammad being a pedophile, claims of Muslims spreading Islam by the sword and subjugating minority groups under their rule.
So, you know, facts.
To characterize Muslims as being sex groomers inherently violent or incapable of living harmoniously in plural societies.
Well, prove us wrong.
And this definition we'll use is suggested by appointing arch-remainer Dominique Grieve, who wrote a forward to the All-Party Parliament Group's definition report and chaired the Citizens UK Commission on Islam.
Report author, now Health Secretary Wes Streeting, telling The Guardian last month that irresponsible and coarse public discourse about the rape gangs could cause a mosque shooting like in Christchurch, England.
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
That would be terrible.
That would be terrible.
But what about the actual crimes being committed?
It's just one of those things.
The Norm Macdonald joke, right?
If a Muslim set off a dirty bomb in New York City, you'd be really worried about the backlash against peaceful Muslims, right?
If you talk about the systematic raping of white girls by Muslim immigrants, well, you might inspire a terrorist to hurt them.
Crazy and retarded, but...
I think we can all agree it's bad.
It's bad that they are now establishing a review board on Islamophobia.
And in particular, by adopting this very wide and far-reaching definition of Islamophobia, they're creating blasphemy laws in the UK. In fact, there are images going around yesterday.
Of a white British person being arrested by two Muslim policemen for disrespecting a Quran.
I don't know if he was burning it or just speaking out against it or destroying it in some way.
But he was hurting a book.
So they arrested him.
Because the book was Muslim.
And these police officers happened to be Muslim as well.
So I'd consider that a blasphemy law.
I think when you have the state police dispatched to arrest peaceful citizens.
We're making a statement or symbolically being against Islam.
That's what you call blasphemy law of a state religion.
And it is horrifying.
It is absolutely horrifying.
I think we can all agree that that's absolutely horrifying.
So how do we feel about what's happening here?
How do we feel when it's Jews and not Muslims doing this exact same thing?
Are we as against it?
Are we as horrified by...
The violation of free speech and the curtailment of legitimate criticism of a religion or a group of people that practice that religion?
Or are we making excuses for it?
I see a lot of excuses being made for this.
Here's the actual press release from the Justice Department published yesterday.
Justice Department announces formation of task force to combat anti-Semitism.
Pursuant to President Trump's executive order on additional measures to combat antisemitism, the Justice Department announced today the formation of a multi-agency task force to combat antisemitism.
The task force's first priority will be to root out antisemitic harassment in schools and on college campuses.
In addition to the Department of Justice, the task force will include representatives of the U.S. Department of Education, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and other agencies as it develops.
The task force will be coordinating through the department's civil rights divisions.
Okay, so first of all, we should get rid of the department's civil rights division.
First of all, that should go away, unless it's actually supporting people's civil rights, one of which, by the way, is the ability to criticize religions.
In fact, that's the first one.
That's the First Amendment.
It's actually the first thing in the First Amendment.
Of the five freedoms, it's the first one listed.
Now, this has been a long, slow process of this stuff getting implemented.
Biden implemented different parts of it.
Even before then, Trump implemented different parts of it.
It was like the State Department adopted this definition of anti-Semitism.
That came from the International Holocaust Remembrance Association that essentially said that criticizing Jews, individuals, the Jewish people, the Jewish faith, for crimes real or imagined or just anything ever, that's anti-Semitism.
Criticizing Israel as a country, as a nation, the choices it makes, the things it does, also anti-Semitism.
So you've got the State Department adopting this definition of anti-Semitism from the IHRA that says talking about Jews in a negative way or the Jewish state in a negative way is anti-Semitism and should be illegal.
The State Department adopts that.
The Trump administration incorporates that definition in accordance with the State Department.
The Biden administration comes out and wants to establish this task force where it won't just be an independent task force.
The idea is that you'll have offices in every single branch of government that's there to make sure that nothing that happens in that branch of government violates the anti-Semitism definition, which again is just totally arbitrary and amounts to a blasphemy law.
It's a blasphemy law.
Justice Department announces Jewish Inquisition.
That's what's going on here.
Hard to figure this out.
In fact, I can make a few simple changes once you understand what they mean in this definition of anti-Semitism.
When you think anti-Semitism, you think Nazis, you think throwing Jews in a gas chamber, you think some of the protests that we've seen recently with Hamas saying kill all Jews, really horrible, hateful stuff.
That's not what the definition is, though.
That's not what the definition is.
The definition just means criticizing or Speaking up against them or disagreeing with them in some way.
And so you have to understand that's what they're going after.
They're not worried that the Department of Education is teaching children that there's a global Jewish conspiracy and that they all have to be rounded up.
That's not happening.
That's not a concern of theirs.
It's not happening.
There'd be no point in appointing somebody to look for that stuff because it doesn't exist.
So why are they appointing things to the Department of Education?
To make sure that everything is in accordance with the desires of the people who run the IRHA or the HRA or the ADL or APAC. That's all that this is.
So it's a blasphemy law.
So you can just replace the word anti-Semitism with heresy because it's what it is.
It's heresy.
It's heresy against the state religion.
And then it just sounds like something that...
The Spanish government would have written in the mid-1400s.
Pursuant to Trump's executive order on additional measures to combat heresy, the Justice Department announced today the formation of a multi-agency task force to combat heresy.
The task force's first priority will be to root out, you can say, heretical and blasphemous teachings.
If you just change this to what they actually mean...
Which is like, you can't disagree with our religious interpretations of ancient scripture.
Otherwise, that's heretical and blasphemous, and the government is now patrolling for that.
Root out heretical and blasphemous harassment in schools and college campuses.
Now, the only way I've seen this being defended by my Jewish friends is that, well, harassment is already illegal.
Harassment is illegal.
There's no problem with this.
It's not overreach.
It's not a violation of the First Amendment because they're focusing on harassment.
And that's already illegal.
And it's like, if it's already illegal, then why do you need the task force?
Why do you need the task force?
Yes, harassment is illegal.
What this does is establish a paradigm in which some harassment is more important than others.
Some harassment has a task force to go after it.
Other harassment is just a crime that's normally...
Committed.
So why do you, if harassment's already illegal, if it's talking about strictly focusing on things that's already punishable, like harassment, on whatever basis, then this is not necessary.
Okay?
In fact, maybe I'll pull up some of the arguments being made just so I can counter them.
But is this about harassment?
Is it about things like...
You know, physically preventing Jewish kids from getting into their classroom.
Because that's happened on college campuses, and it's wrong, and it is harassment, and it is discrimination, and it is already illegal, and it should be treated like that.
Because it's illegal in this country to say, no, you are of this race or of this ethnicity or of this religion.
Therefore, you're not allowed in our college classroom, especially if the college is federally funded.
That's already legal.
They can take it to court and they can solve that problem.
And if they find that the school facilitated the students who were abusing and harassing people on the basis of their race or religion, then they can be dealt with as well.
A task force is not necessary for this.
Or even desirable for this.
But what do they actually say this is about?
Well, according to Senior Counsel for the Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, Leo Terrell, anti-Semitism in any environment is repugnant to this nation's ideals.
The department takes seriously our responsibility to eradicate this hatred wherever it's found.
Okay, so they're not talking about stopping harassment and physical violence.
They're talking about eradicating hatred.
So this is...
This is the thought police.
They're talking about eradicating thought crime.
Hatred is not an attack.
Hatred is not harassment.
Hatred is an idea.
They want to eradicate an idea.
It's not going to work, first of all.
Second of all, it's only confirming what anti-Semites say.
After all, it doesn't seem like any other religion has this type of pull with the American government.
It doesn't seem like any other religion.
Is having task force made to make sure that Harvard comports with the Catholic dogma?
That'd be kind of absurd, wouldn't it?
This is just as absurd.
I don't know how we break through the mind control that's been imposed on the American people.
Jews are not special.
They don't get special treatment in this country.
No religion does.
It's like kind of the point of our country.
Kind of the reason the pilgrims got on the Mayflower in the first place was because the...
The country they were from, England, suppressed and oppressed them for having different religious ideas, for criticizing the religion of the state.
It's like kind of the reason America exists is for religious freedom.
This is the opposite of that.
This is a total and complete inversion of that, and yet they're using the same claims to justify it.
He says, anti-Semitism in any environment is repugnant to the nation's ideals.
The nation's ideals are that...
You get to speak out against anybody.
If you boil America down into one singular ideal, it is freedom of speech, incumbent, necessary.
An irremovable part of that is the ability to criticize religions, their practitioners, their dogma, their practices.
That is American.
That is what the First Amendment guarantees.
People are saying, well, this doesn't, it says they're not allowed to establish a religion.
Right, they're not allowed to establish a state religion.
The American government is not allowed to choose a religion and say this one is the state religion of our government and our government resources and our government authority will be used to enforce their dogma, their ideas, root out their enemies.
That's what's happening here.
That's what this is.
This is a egregious and unacceptable violation of the First Amendment.
unidentified
It's just insane.
harrison smith
It's insane, but it's kind of typical at the same time.
And we've been warning about this, and they're still trying to pass a law to ban anti-Semitism, still pushing very hard in that direction.
It supersedes any division between left or right or Democratic or Republican.
Trump pursued this in his first administration.
Biden pursued it in his second.
Trump is now pursuing it in his third and actually prioritizing it in his third.
And it must be a funny skit because I was just thinking about all the things that Trump has done.
And with every single one, there seems to be an exception for Israel.
It's almost like you go back and forth where it's just like...
Trump is ending all the foreign aid!
Everybody's like, yeah!
Except for Israel.
What was that last part?
I said that Trump is reasserting free speech in universities.
They're not going to be biased anymore.
unidentified
Everybody's like, yeah, yeah!
harrison smith
Except anti-Semitism, you can't talk about Jews.
Sorry, what was that last part?
Everything that Trump is doing that's good has a little carve-out, a little caveat.
A little dent in it.
Just the size of anti-Semitism.
It's kind of annoying.
I have to be honest with you.
So people are saying, well, it's really just focused on harassment.
I would be against it if it was encroaching on the First Amendment.
The existence of this task force is an encroachment on the First Amendment.
It is a blatant violation of the principles and the spirit of the First Amendment.
We do not have a state religion in America.
And just because it's Judaism and not Islam in this instance doesn't mean it's better.
It doesn't mean it's okay in this instance, but it wouldn't be otherwise.
So just why I started this little segment with the thing about an Islamophobia task force in the UK, I have the feeling there's a lot of people out there that when told that, they're outraged.
But when told it's being done here for Jews, they're in favor of it.
Don't be a hypocrite, okay?
You gotta be consistent in your beliefs.
I consistently believe that the American government should not be beholden to a group of a singular religion, should not be enforcing the demands or the dogma of a single religion, and doesn't have the right to determine whether something is valid speech or not, determinant on whether a group of religion thinks it's offensive to them.
Because we've seen the way that anti-Semitism, the label, is used to discredit perfectly legitimate conversation, whether it's about the Israeli war or about the activities of the likes of George Soros.
It's a shield they use to prevent criticism of this.
And it's also deeply hypocritical on the face of it with who's implementing this under the Trump administration.
From Information Liberation, Trump appointee...
It says, quote, Palestinians are fundamentally evil, collectively guilty, and not worthy of mercy.
Well, that's kind of horrifying.
Hey, you want to eradicate hate?
Why don't you go after this guy?
That's the most hateful thing I've ever heard.
Palestinians are fundamentally evil, collectively guilty, unworthy of any mercy, and need to be ethnically cleansed from Gaza to make it great again, according to Zionist activist Michael Olinor.
A Trump appointee to the Holocaust Memorial Council.
We have a memorial council for a thing that we ended.
From Jerusalem Post, there has been international uproar since U.S. President Donald Trump told reporters on Air Force One flight to Vegas last weekend that he wants the Arab countries to absorb the population of Gaza during its reconstruction.
Trump merely said he told Jordanian king Abdullah II that he would like Jordan and Egypt to take in Palestinians temporarily or on a long-term basis and that he would discuss the matter with Egyptian president Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.
Those who purport to care about Gaza should be gushing with praise for the president for caring enough to find them a positive resolution to their current problems.
I'm laughing because the people writing this are the Israelis.
I mean, they're literally killing the Gazans and they're like, at least Trump has a good idea of what to do with these people.
Horrifying.
Those who, myself, who do not believe Gazans are worthy of any mercy should welcome it as well.
I mean, just horrifying.
Again, so, you know, replace anti-Semitism task force with Islamophobia task force or blasphemy task force.
Call it what it is.
Call it an inquisition.
And it becomes pretty obvious why it's not a good thing.
For some reason, this gets all twisted around.
Because it's anti-Semitism.
And that label does things to people.
In the same way, I mean, is it really that hard to understand what this person is saying?
I mean, if I were to say that Jews are fundamentally evil, they're collectively guilty.
Of things that Jews have done in the past, like the Communist Revolution.
That killed 100 million white Europeans.
They're not worthy of mercy.
Sounds kind of anti-Semitic, doesn't it?
The bad thing is that there's evil people with these racial hatreds that are used to start wars and oppress people.
Let's get rid of that, not empower them with a task force to do their bidding.
I don't care if it's about Palestinians or Muslims or Jews.
It's wrong.
I'll tell you this, folks.
RFK is already getting results.
RIP to the Pfizer and Moderna stocks.
The stocks of both vaccine manufacturers, Pfizer and Moderna, immediately crashed after RFK Jr.'s nomination advanced towards the Senate.
unidentified
Uh-oh.
harrison smith
Looks like the gravy train is pulling up to the station to be destroyed.
It's wonderful to see.
CSRFK has been approved by the committee.
He will go to a full Senate vote on Tuesday.
Tulsi Gabbard will be voted on by her committee later today.
Of course, they're desperate to do it in secret.
They really want it to be a secret vote because they understand that voting against Trump's appointees will represent a death blow to their political aspirations.
So everybody's learning this lesson.
Everybody's coming around.
They're all starting to understand that what Trump represents, not the American people being tricked.
It's not us falling for a big strong man because we're just stupid and like that he makes fun of journalists.
That's part of it.
We do like the guy.
But what he represents is a total reformation, a total stopgap measure.
To stop the bleeding, hopefully get the American body stabilized out of the critical condition we find ourselves in, and hopefully into the future we can make some systematic changes to cure ourselves holistically from the cancer that's eating us from the inside out, this leftism that is slowly but surely destroying everything that we hold dear.
They're having to learn this lesson one way or another.
Unfortunately, Europe is still way, way behind in the whole race for freedom here.
Just these three stories from, well, let's do four.
Let's add in the one that we just covered, the Islamophobia.
So the UK is now enacting Islamic blasphemy law boards to go after people who criticize gang rapists.
Okay, great.
Now combine that with this, Tony Blair says digital IDs will curb populism.
Back's facial recognition says public will trade privacy for efficiency.
Yeah.
So they're not even like trying to cover it up anymore.
You know, it used to be like, all right, we want to put, you know, we think this digital ID thing will really curb populism, but we can't just say that.
We need to say it's about safety.
We need to say it's about...
You know, terrorism or hell, let's let in a bunch of illegal immigrants and then say it's about illegal immigration.
That's how they got Real ID passed.
You can hear it if you go listen back to stories in the 90s when they were passing Real ID. And they were like, yeah, it's going to diminish your privacy, but we have to because once it's in place, illegal immigration will go away.
Fast forward 40 years, our privacy has been utterly eviscerated.
And we probably have 75 million illegal immigrants in this country.
So it's a lie.
It's a lie when they say that stuff.
But now they're not even bothering to lie.
They're literally saying we have to have digital ID or else the populist will win.
Or else the elite, the powerful, the entrenched global deep state will be run out of office.
So we have to intimidate people out of their political expression by scanning their face every 10 seconds.
With their phone.
So that's pretty incredible.
Not credible.
EU approves powdered insect larvae in bread and other foods.
The European Commission has approved the use of mealworm larvae flower in a range of food products, including cheeses, jams, pastas, and bread, provided the insects have been treated with UV radiation.
Okay.
Oh, as long as you shine a light on them, we can make you eat bugs.
unidentified
Crazy.
harrison smith
The move aligns with the Food and Agricultural Organization's longstanding support for insects as a more environmentally sustainable source of protein.
Alongside mealworms, house crickets and migratory locusts have also been approved for consumption in frozen, dried or powdered form.
The World Economic Forum argues that insect-based foods can help combat climate change by offering alternatives to protein sources.
Under the EU's novel food regulations, edible insects are categorized alongside algae and other products derived from modern techniques.
Well, incredible answer.
And I believe I was reading with this rule.
You can have up to 40% of the food composed of insect material.
It's one of those situations where I could get into the scientific basis of why we don't want to eat bugs, the chitin, the health risks it has.
But they want you to eat bugs, and you don't have to eat bugs.
Don't eat bugs, don't eat grubs, don't eat worms or locusts.
Just don't.
Just don't.
You don't want to.
You shouldn't have to.
Just don't do it.
The scientific argument is very powerful, and you can make the scientific argument very persuasively.
But they just want you to eat bugs, and you don't have to, so just don't.
Okay, I mean, I can reason it out for you, but like, your instincts are right a lot of the time.
When somebody offers you a squiggly little worm with a bunch of legs and pincers and says, doesn't this look delicious?
It's okay to say no.
It's okay to be a human being and not a frog.
First they turn the frogs gay, then they want to turn us into frogs?
I don't think so.
We know what happens next.
Yeah, there's any number of reasons not to eat bugs.
But you don't need any of them.
Just say no.
That's what we need.
We need a new DARE program.
Just say no to bugs.
It's good.
It rhymes.
Just say no to drugs.
Just say no to bugs.
Don't eat the bugs, folks.
EU's disinformation code becomes mandatory under censorship law.
Platforms preemptively enforce rules ahead of German elections.
The inevitable slide of EU's voluntary, at least in name, disinformation code, the 2022 version, into mandatory rules indicated into the Digital Services Act censorship law will become enforceable this July.
See, this is the way this works.
This is the way they destroy free speech.
Incrementally.
Piece by piece.
Bit by bit.
Oh, this is voluntary.
Don't worry about it.
We're going to have these guidelines and they're voluntary.
If you feel like following them, do it.
If you don't, don't.
People are like, this is against free speech.
And they're like, it's voluntary.
Don't worry about it.
If you want to say, say whatever you want.
We wanted these guidelines to give people a basis to touch base and sort of figure out, align themselves and what they think is best.
Fast forward two years and like, oh yeah, now that's mandatory actually.
Actually, we made that into a law.
So you let us do it when we told you it was voluntary.
That was our foot in the door.
Now we're making it law.
You never would have let us if we tried to make this a law in the first place.
But because we did it gently and quietly and incrementally, you fell for it.
We have thought crime, and you're not allowed to speak out against us, or else you're a terrorist.
Gee, I wonder if that's going to happen with the anti-Semitism enforcement board.
Gee, I wonder if that's the exact same strategy they're pursuing here with anti-Semitism.
I wonder.
I mean, it's a task force to deal with harassment, which is already illegal, okay?
So what are you worried about?
No encroachment here.
unidentified
Okay.
harrison smith
And this is as far as it goes, right?
It's a hardcore stop.
You firmly believe in the First Amendment.
You would never go any farther than that, right?
All of this is just a foot in the door.
All of these little schemes they pull are to facilitate the eventual creation of laws in these same regards.
So it's literally happening right in front of us in the EU. We don't have the First Amendment.
They don't have the protection that we do.
That we did.
That we're giving up right now.
Because they used the A word.
That scares everybody into compliance.
Not us.
Not us, obviously.
Just in time for Germany's early election.
Scheduled for the last week of February.
Large platforms.
Google Meta platforms.
Microsoft, TikTok, Snapchat, LinkedIn and X participated in a stress test of their readiness to investigate risks to civil discourse and electoral process related to that vote.
It is taken by some reports to mean that though the voluntary code will become obligatory in the summer, the integration before February 23rd in Germany means that platforms with more than 45 million users in the EU will implement disinformation rules.
Okay, so goodbye free speech in Europe.
You had a good run.
You had a good run there for a couple thousand years, but it's over now because people got offended.
So that's what's going on in Europe and just barely scratching the surface.
Let's get back to what's happening.
Here in America, in the way that the Democrats are having a hard time learning their lesson, having a hard time coming around to understanding the world that they themselves have created.
And it's funny, they're so warped and they're so out of touch.
Like, they keep posting things that Trump is doing and being like, you voted for this.
You have to live with this.
And we're looking at it like, Yeah, we love it.
No, you're right.
Yeah, we voted for this.
We are going to live with this.
It's cool and good.
So I don't even know what they think is going on.
But we love everything Trump is doing for the most part, except for the anti-Semitism stuff.
But other than that, it's all very good.
And the left is just really, really struggling in this new paradigm.
I feel for them.
Let's go to clip number nine here.
Frank Lutz.
He tries very gently to tell CNN and the Democrats that what they're doing isn't working.
They don't want to hear any of it.
Let's watch.
unidentified
This group, I think I'm kind of afraid to be alone in this group.
I surveyed these people.
I focus grouped them.
And they are really, really tired of being accused of either racism or sexism because they voted for Donald Trump.
And it's one of the reasons why so many of them did.
I sat on this stage with you and got chewed out when I suggested there's a better language to reach out to voters, that the Harris campaign is missing what they're looking for.
And I say the same thing here.
Americans just want to be Americans, not hyphenated Americans.
Not female Americans, black Americans, Jewish Americans.
They just want to be Americans.
abby phillip
How do you think it makes people feel, black people, women, any person who has immutable characteristics about themselves, to be told every time that something happens that because they exist in a particular role, it is their fault?
unidentified
People are really fucking stupid.
harrison smith
I didn't know there was that clip on the end.
But it's appropriate.
It certainly is appropriate.
How do you think?
But again, it's like, it's funny when she's like, people who have immutable characteristics, everybody has immutable characteristics.
Immutable means you can't change them.
It just means how you were born.
Being white is an immutable character.
Okay, they don't even understand the words they're using.
That's fine.
That's all right.
I'll tell you.
I try to put myself in the minds, in the shoes of black people.
And I would be so mad.
I would be so infuriated at the concept of affirmative action and diversity.
It would piss me off to no end to know that no matter how capable I was, no matter how much I actually earned my position, I would still have to live with people assuming that I got that job because I was black.
That legitimately would piss me off.
It'd be such an insult to be told the only way you're getting this job is if we bend the rules for you because of who you are.
And then if I was in that position, people would always be looking at me, you know, side-eye, going, I bet he was a diversity hire.
It wouldn't matter how good I was.
It wouldn't matter how capable I was.
Because everybody else around me had to take advantage of some, you know, program to force them into a place they don't belong.
I would have to live with that assumption about me.
That would truly infuriate me.
Truly.
And so funny, because that clip goes on.
And Frank Luntz is just like genuinely trying to help the Democrats.
He's actually sitting there going, here's what you did wrong.
Here's how you can do it better.
Okay?
Just your language is offensive to people and you need to phrase it a different way.
You can still believe what you want to believe.
I'm just telling you, calling everybody racist and sexist is not a winning strategy.
And they're just like, so you hate black people too, huh?
Okay.
Carry on then, I guess.
I guess just keep doing what you're doing.
You absolute morons.
I'm for it.
I'm glad they're not learning the lesson.
Honestly, I'm glad.
Because not only are they not learning the lessons that they should be learning about how just patently offensive their entire worldview is to the average intelligent person, but they still think they're in a world where they can just get away with crap, where like by virtue signaling That you're a lefty, you can just do whatever you want and there are no consequences.
I'm glad that we're disabusing them of that idea, and I'd like to see more of it.
The mayor of, or is it the governor of New Jersey?
Yeah, it was the governor of New Jersey, Murphy, who is, by the way, the ugliest person in politics.
I've never seen somebody with a face like this.
It's probably not beside the point, actually.
Actually, there probably is something metaphysical going on here, but regardless of what the man looks like, he's like, I have an illegal alia.
Here he is.
We were having a conversation yesterday while Alex's show was on.
They put that picture up, and all of us just froze, and we're just like, oh my god!
We totally stopped the conversation in its tracks.
He's a very ugly man.
unidentified
Can confirm.
harrison smith
Yes.
He said he's harboring an illegal migrant.
He's like, I have an illegal immigrant staying at my home, and I'm not going to let ICE come and get them.
Yeah, that's not the world we live in anymore, dude.
Let's go to Robert, or not Robert, rather, Tom Homan, border czar.
Yeah, I might go arrest that guy.
Clip number three.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Let me read a headline to you.
Chicago leaders encourage residents to exercise their rights in resisting Trump's deportation policies.
sean hannity
The governor of New Jersey, Phil Murphy, basically admitted that he knew somebody that didn't have full documentation, that he was hiding over his garage.
unidentified
But there's someone in our broader universe whose immigration status is not yet at the point that they are trying to get it to.
And we said, you know what, let's have her live at our house above our garage.
And good luck to the feds coming in to try to get her.
Your comment on all of that?
Well, I think the governor's pretty foolish saying what he said, because I've gotten old of it.
Won't let it go.
We'll look into it.
And if he's ignoringly harboring, concealing an illegal alien, that's a violation of Title VIII, United States Code 1324. I will seek prosecution, or the Secretary will seek prosecution.
So maybe he's bluffing.
If he's not, we'll deal with that.
tom homan
And as far as to the sanctuary cities, well, get in line, because the Trump administration is going to do that already.
unidentified
Sanctuary cities are sanctuary for criminals.
One example, right?
Sanctuary cities in New York City.
tom homan
If they would have gave us over the killer of Lake and Riley when he got arrested in New York City for an endangering child, He would have been in jail.
unidentified
He would have never killed Lake and Riley.
Sanctuary cities are responsible for deaths of thousands, thousands of young children throughout my career.
And we're going to sue them.
We're going home.
And look, we've got to go to the Supreme Court.
That's what President Trump wanted to do.
He will end Sanctuary Cities.
You know, there was a 20- So there you go.
harrison smith
He says, that's Tom Homan, border czar, saying, I think it's a little bit silly of the governor to brag about this.
We're going to go arrest him.
You can't harbor illegal immigrants.
I mean, it's absurd that they think they can get away with this.
It's also funny that the image that you get initially is like, you know, when you hear the Governor Murphy says he's hiding an illegal immigrant, you get the picture of like maybe a family.
I don't know.
I picture a legal immigrant.
I picture like, you know, a Hispanic yard worker type guy, you know, guys hanging out outside Home Depot.
I'm pretty sure, and this is just total speculation, My read of that is that Governor Murphy probably has like an au pair from like Belgium that's overstaying her visa.
And he's having her stay in the room above the garage.
Yeah, I have a feeling that it's something along those lines.
And just total personal benefit.
Now he's got this like, he's like hiding like Anne Frank in the attic.
He's like, oh, you can't come out.
You can't go anywhere.
He's got to stay here and take a look after my kids and clean my house.
It's very funny.
It's very funny.
He's doing something just strictly out of pure personal convenience.
But he's framing it as if he's leading a resistance against the evil Trump regime.
Very funny.
I don't know if there's any more details, but literally off just what we saw, I'm going to bet it's an au pair from Europe that he's keeping in his garage apartment and hiding from ice.
If I had to guess.
Clip number two is...
Arizona attorney Mayra de la Torre caught in a sting instructing illegal foreign nationals to lie to law enforcement.
We can watch a little bit of this.
Says you can make things up.
We're not working.
We're volunteering here.
This person is just helping.
Volunteers, no, never say work, she says.
If they ask, what about the $200?
Say, it's a gift for my good work.
unidentified
For being a volunteer?
harrison smith
Good, very good question.
Use those words.
unidentified
In Tucson, Arizona, the Southside Worker Center, operating out of the Southside Presbyterian Church, runs an illegal alien worker cooperative.
Every weekday, the Southside Worker Center links businesses across Tucson with illegal aliens to serve as cheap laborers.
However, the problem runs much deeper than this.
anthony rubin
You're about to see how this organization, with ties to the Tucson Mexican Consulate, is actively radicalizing and coaching illegal aliens on how to avoid and escape deportation and illegally remain inside the United States.
harrison smith
Yeah, totally, totally illegal.
Well, it's totally illegal is what it is.
They're training foreigners to circumvent and avoid American law enforcement.
And they're doing it openly.
And this is the thing.
It's giving us actually kind of a great opportunity.
Because they're so disoriented and not organized in a very efficient fashion, now is the greatest time ever if you wanted to disrupt their operations.
They've got these websites and social media tags where you're supposed to warn people about ICE. You could have a great time just sitting there while you're watching TV. Just pull your phone out and start reporting ICE raids places where they're not happening.
Why not?
Just get in and just start messing up their operation.
Just go to the meeting where they're training illegal aliens how to avoid the law and record it on your phone and publish it.
Just like we just did.
And you can expose this.
And the people in power are actually responsive enough now that you can tag them and show them what's happening and they'll go after them.
You can actually assist and participate in this reestablishment of law and order in this country.
And whether that's...
Monitoring and disrupting the activities of Antifa cells that are coordinating behind the scenes or illegal immigrants trying to avoid ICE. You can actually be a massive force disruptor on your own.
Don't do anything illegal.
I'm not encouraging you to do anything.
Definitely don't do anything vigilante.
Things are going well.
Things are going very well right now.
We are on the right track.
In every possible regard.
Except for certain ones.
But the last thing in the world that we need is people going out and attacking these protests or whatever.
Stay smart.
Stay strategic.
Disrupt them if you can through information and by reporting what they're doing to us or to anybody else with a platform who can get it out there.
They're already on their back foot.
They're already on the ropes.
A little bit more pressure, and this whole corrupt system goes down never to return.
We're doing it.
We're two weeks into a four-year process, but we've got to keep the pedal to the metal, foot on the gas, and the wind at our backs.
Folks, I hope you can support us in doing this.
One of the best ways that you can help to support the movement...
That is experiencing such incredible victory right now is by simply going to thealexjonesstore.com.
Go to thealexjonesstore.com to guarantee that we have the platform that we've used to not just help to facilitate and push forward and carry out this massive political realignment, but we'll continue to long into the future.
And we'll do it forever.
We are committed to this.
We're all in on this.
We are going to continue to stand up against the tyrants and the useful idiot psychopaths that are destroying our country.
All that we ask is that you go to thealexjonesstore.com to support us.
Thealexjonesstore.com/harrison to let them know who sent you.
Stay tuned, Alex Jones, in 90 seconds.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Infowars.com forward slash show.
alex jones
Folks, I'm not funded by any big corporations or anybody.
I am funded by viewers and listeners because over the years they would target our sponsors and threaten them and take them away.
We direct sell high-quality products, supplements, mementos, clickable knives, Patriot Gear at thealexshowstore.com.
But the supplements are some of the best you're going to find anywhere.
And we have this new product that boosts your immune system with all the known concentrated herbs and compounds.
Atomic Defense, meaning, you know, nuke the bad guys.
Boost your immune system.
Ahead of all the things that are going on, it's so good for you.
The ingredients are incredible.
It's our newest product at thealexjonesstore.com, and then it funds our operation as a political, cultural, spiritual immune system to fight the globalist, a true 360 win.
And out of the gates, it's 40% off.
Introductory offer, you take this, it's good for your whole body.
Export Selection