All Episodes
Jan. 14, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:37:33
The American Journal: President Trump Demands Gov. Newsom ‘Release The Water’ As SoCal Fires Continue Burning - FULL SHOW - 01/14/2025
Participants
Main voices
a
alex cargill
13:22
h
harrison smith
01:42:37
m
matt baker
15:40
Appearances
a
alex jones
04:39
j
jon bowne
03:16
Clips
c
chase geiser
00:57
d
donald j trump
00:55
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Misdirection.
By accusing an opponent of what you yourself are doing, you shift attention away from your own actions and create confusion.
And there's also guilt by association.
By linking your opponent to the behavior you're accusing them of, you attempt to taint their reputation to undermine public trust.
jon bowne
Diversion.
unidentified
The tactic can distract from the actual issues, evidence making it harder for opponents to officially counter your claims.
alex jones
I only read Rules for Radicals once, like 20 years ago or 30 years ago, but it's...
Saul Alinsky pledges it to the first radical Lucifer, and it's all how to be totally deceptive, how to lie, how to betray people, how to steal, how to just be total scum.
And Hillary and others admit it's their Bible.
It's Obama's Bible.
And it's just like, wow.
jon bowne
The ghetto, not the place you would imagine methods of global dominance to spring from.
But it was in the ghettos across the United States that Saul Alinsky would fine-tune tactics of civil disobedience that would one day be employed by New World Order puppet Barack Hussein Obama.
unidentified
Resolutions of ideal problems always carry within their wake another problem.
jon bowne
Alinsky's rules for radicals is the left's playbook.
Chock full of creeping tactics used by scheming politicians and Soros-fueled millennial generation groups like Black Lives Matter.
unidentified
All lives matter.
jon bowne
Hellbent on tearing the fabric of American society apart.
unidentified
Anti-cop rhetoric that is sweeping the United States of America, fueled by this group, some of the vulgar, vile, vicious rhetoric that's coming out, talking about killing cops.
jon bowne
Alinsky's albeit deceptively noble attempt to create a system to reward the have-nots with the power and surplus of the haves would prove to be just as useful for the New World Order sycophants to achieve an uprooting of American values and an overpass of the United States Constitutional Foundation to be replaced by totalitarianism disguised as compassionate socialism.
These tactics simply needed the perfect charismatic turncoat to steer Hear them.
Enter Barack Obama.
unidentified
All of us want to give our president every tool necessary to do this.
And all of us were willing to do that in this bill.
And anyone who says otherwise is lying to the American people.
jon bowne
Saul Alinsky died decades before a young pre-Senate Barack Obama.
Would spend three years following in Alinsky's footsteps as a community organizer.
In 2009, the National Review stated, Obama's mentors from his Chicago days studied at a school Alinsky founded, and they taught their students the philosophy and methods of one of the first community organizers.
Saul Alinsky wrote in Rules for Radicals, As an organizer, I start from where the world is, as it is, not as I would like it to be.
That we accept the world as it is doesn't in any sense weaken our desire to change it into what we believe it should be.
It is necessary to begin where the world is if we are going to change it to what we think it should be.
That means working in the system.
So what are some of the tactics being utilized in that system at accelerating degrees in the shaping of modern American society?
Rule number one.
Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.
Obama and the nut jobs in the nation's capital would have us all believe that they have overwhelming support from the have-nots while destroying the middle class, increasing the debt and welfare class to unsustainable levels, and projecting it all from their mainstream media bubble.
Rule number two, never go outside the expertise of your people.
Basically, why bother engaging in a rational debate based on facts with your adversary?
Simply bring up the despised policies or traditions and belittle them until they're crushed.
unidentified
Less than loving expressions by Christians?
I get concerned.
alex jones
That's right.
Let's criticize Christianity on Easter, you piece of crap.
unidentified
Best topic for another day.
jon bowne
Skipping to rule number eight, keep the pressure on.
Never let up.
Obama must say this rule to himself every morning.
As one shoe drops, another one is ready to fall.
Not in the manner of a leader responding to a country's pleas in the midst of a crisis, but more in the vein of a tyrant quietly and charismatically creating them while offering shallow direction as stale as his predecessor's rhetoric.
And if just that sample of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals wasn't enough, Alinsky even dedicated the left's playbook to Lucifer himself.
unidentified
I suppose given a choice, I think I would pick hell.
It's Tuesday, January 14th in the year of our Lord 2025. And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
Welcome to The American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from the InfoWars headquarters here in Austin, Texas.
It is Tuesday, the 14th of January.
We've got a lot to talk about today.
We'll give you some updates to the LA Fire, some political goings-on.
Pete Hegseth to be confirmed or not.
Very, very soon, of course, this is the final week of the Biden administration.
They're desperately trying to tie up loose ends.
We'll get into what some of that looks like.
Yesterday was...
Another major day here at InfoWars.
There was a courtroom appearance.
Alex Jones gave a major update on this.
We'll go to clip number three.
The full thing is about 20 minutes.
We'll play a few minutes here.
Just give you a quick little update and rundown as to what happened yesterday with the InfoWars court case.
Let's watch.
alex jones
It is the afternoon of Monday, June 13th, 2025. And I have an update for everyone on the future of InfoWars.
And I'll have more in the near future, but there's some information we're not going to release quite yet about what we've discovered went on a few months ago during the failed fake auction by the Bloomberg-backed National Gun Control Group using the Onion parody as their front group to take over InfoWars, pledging them Bernie Madoff-style made-up derivatives of future earnings I have.
And then, of course,
the judge had a two-day hearing on December 9th and 10th and said that He was overruling it and that the auction did not go through.
So they have a lot of egg on their face, and they're very, very upset, and it's Akin Gump and the Democrat Party law firms and the Democratic Party that are running all of this.
And they ran the show trials where judges already found me guilty, and then juries had hearings on damages, complete with HBO, putting makeup on the judges, and just, it was ridiculous.
And this fiasco has totally blown up in their face.
So that's just some basic backstory.
But now today at a hearing, the judge approved the Infowars lease that ended January 1st, 2025, a few days ago, to be extended three months by the U.S. trustee that is over the case from the Justice Department, and that in the next few weeks they're going to have...
Some other dates set when the U.S. trustee is ready to tell the court whether or not they have anyone bidding against the company that I've been working with that followed all the rules that's now doubled their bid to $8 million.
The AP says over $7 million.
They just can't seem to get anything right.
Technically, I guess it is, but it's $8 million.
I don't know why they couldn't even get that fact right.
From the court.
And we are expecting the Democratic Party that runs all this with Bloomberg to come back sometime right before the next hearing hasn't been set yet and say we're back with our distributed waiver system, which again just is a made-up thing, never before been done.
You can't find anywhere in any of these court proceedings to pledge.
Someone's future earnings that are on appeal by law, the judgment has not been perfected, and then to pledge that person's earnings that you can't even guarantee, I could die or get disabled or just quit, towards money they're using to buy the company out of my estate to then give it to themselves.
If that gives you a headache, it gave the judge.
A headache.
And they couldn't even say how much money they'd actually bid.
Turned out they had a floating bid that no matter how much anybody else bid, they would just then magically say that more of the funny money, $1.3 billion has been reduced by the Connecticut Appeals Court from 1.5 to 1.3.
And none of this even matters because I've never had even $10 million in the bank, much less what they're talking about.
And it just shows how lies are stacked on top of lies.
I mean, they said in the Connecticut court, The Texas court that I had hundreds of millions of dollars in the bank and that I made it off them who I barely ever even talked about.
I only sent the name of one of the people that sued me.
But, oh, I made my living off them.
I sent people to attack them and harass them and pee on graves.
No witnesses.
When my lawyers asked them.
harrison smith
So that's the little quick update from Alex Jones.
The whole video is about 20 minutes long.
You can find it on his ex.
Yes, the company backing InfoWars has doubled its previous winning bid.
But I don't even get this.
So, what do you even do now?
They held the auction.
They totally screwed it up, as Alex Jones just explained.
So now there's like this other process where our side is putting forward a, not really a bid, but like an offer.
I guess, you know, it's a negotiation thing, but like, basically the whole thing is screwed up now.
The whole thing is screwed up because it's like you're playing a game of poker.
And you think the hand's over, so everybody shows their cards, and then you pick your cards back up, and now you're supposed to keep playing the game of poker?
Everybody can see each other's cards.
The game is over.
You can't continue the game if everybody has seen each other's cards.
Everybody knows how much each other's going to bid.
I mean, it just makes no sense.
And again, it's like, you can always deal a new hand.
But even then, it's not a good metaphor, because dealing a new hand would be to do another auction, but...
Now everybody knows what everybody has.
So it's just a mess.
It's just a complete mess.
And I have the feeling we're going to be the ones punished for it.
I have the feeling that the people that actually screwed it all up are going to not suffer any consequences for rigging the auction.
But we'll have to see.
We'll have to wait and see.
There will be another hearing later this month.
I'm not even sure which day.
I'm not sure if y'all call which day it was.
It should be by the end of January that we'll know one way or another the fate of Infowars.
I mean, at this point, it just seems incredibly arbitrary, as it has the entire time.
But at least there were some guide rails before, but now it's like, who knows?
The judges could just give it to us, give it to them.
It's like impossible to say.
Regardless, we will continue on.
We will continue our mission in one form or another.
Whether that's Infowars.com or The Alex Jones Network, you can support us by going to TheAlexJonesStore.com.
Go to TheAlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison to let him know who sent you.
You can also go to DrJonesNaturals.com.
Or not?
Alright.
Alright, things are changing.
Things are changing.
I'm just trying to keep up.
Okay, we got a lot of videos to get to.
We got a lot of stories to get to.
I'm going to take your phone calls today for sure.
It's been like a week since I've taken phone calls, so we'll make up for that today.
And then I'll be joined by Matt Baker later in the show, and I'll be joined by Alex Cargill later in the show as well.
So, jam-packed show for you today.
Let's begin, as we always do, with our daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 14th of January, 2025.
Special counsel report found Trump engaged in criminal effort to overturn 2020 election.
Oh my gosh.
Oh my gosh.
The person, the prosecution instructed to go find criminal activity from Trump has reported that they found criminal activity of Trump?
Well, this is shocking.
Now, the only thing shocking about this is the way that the entire justice System now is completely captured and used entirely without merit or legitimacy to achieve the leftist political ends, and it really is as simple as that.
Again, this all seems very simple to me, but I'll try to explain it.
All that's happened here is that the...
Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, appointed some dude named Jack Smith, no congressional approval, no senatorial approval, just appointed his boy Jack Smith as a bulldog, said go after Trump, get something.
Jack Smith, without any legal authority to do so, launched several investigations on several different topics, got access to everything Trump ever did in those time frames, investigated, interrogated, threatened people with charges themselves, they don't cooperate.
Just ran absolute roughshod over any limitations that the government is supposed to have when investigating citizens.
Put together a dossier.
Had to stop because, well, a variety of reasons.
First and foremost, that Donald Trump is president now.
But also, you know, just various issues with the investigations.
Also included in the issues would be the fact that he is not approved and is not officially in his position and is just some dude with no authority to do everything he's doing.
But that's just one of a myriad of problems that these cases were causing.
All the cases failed to get to the trial phase, let alone the conviction or sentencing phase.
But they went ahead and released or are going to release the report anyway.
So I guess this is just how lawfare works now.
Now, I mean, we saw it happen with Tim Pool and Benny Johnson and any number of other people who were also investigated by the DOJ for claims that turned out not to be true.
They weren't collaborating with Russia.
They hadn't taken any money from Russia with the agreement of changing their coverage in any way.
So it should have been dropped right there.
If you investigate somebody for something and they're innocent of that thing, then you're supposed to just drop it.
Now you can investigate somebody for something, find that they were innocent of those claims that inspired the investigation in the first place.
But you can still take all of the information you gathered during that investigation about different topics totally unrelated to the claim that was first initiated, the investigation, which turned out to be false.
And then you can just prevent what you found in the investigation in order to smear your political opponents, get access to their secrets.
Then you publish something that the mainstream media can distort and twist and warp and run with and tell everybody that, yeah, Tim Pool is a Russian agent.
Benny Johnson is a Russian agent, and Donald Trump is a...
Criminal that tried to criminally overthrow the 2020 election.
It's all fabricated.
It's all fraudulent.
It's all an outrageous violation of our most fundamental protections from the government through the justice system that's supposed to act totally independently from political concerns.
But that's not the case anymore, just so we're aware.
Moving on, Los Angeles wildfires are now in the eighth day of burning.
As Los Angeles enters the eighth day of battling relentless wildfires, a combination of drought conditions, low humidity, and powerful Santa Ana winds have fueled the inferno.
In some areas, winds have reached hurricane strength with speeds up to 100 miles per hour.
At least 24 people have died due to the wildfires.
The Eden Fire killed 16 people, making one of the deadliest in California's history.
And at least 8 people have died in the Palisades Fire.
Now, there have been 73 arrests as a result of these fires.
That's looters and arsonists.
The arsonist who is claimed to be responsible for starting the Eaton fire now faces charges and that is being investigated.
Practically every fire so far has been confirmed as to have human origins of one sort or another.
There's also innumerable videos being posted of people just randomly starting fires in California.
I mean, this is like full-on zombie mode, dystopian collapse where you just have wildfires starting People started them and then other people just being inspired and just starting their own wildfires in their backyards or just on trails or on the side of the highway.
More and more people are posting videos of this.
It is just genuinely completely insane.
Burglar dressed as firefighter among 29 arrests in California.
The full number of people arrested is now up to 73. Here's my question.
You've got this guy that starts the Eaton fire, right?
It kills nine people.
Now, I assume he's going to be charged for something like manslaughter, accidental murder, something like that, right?
You start a fire as an arsonist.
Somebody dies in the blaze.
You are then responsible for and will be charged for their murder.
But how many steps does that go?
And what about the fact that the person who was arrested is an illegal alien who let him in?
So it's like this chain of events was necessary for 16 people to die.
First, they had to rig the election.
Well, hold on.
How far back do we go, right?
First, they had to release a virus.
Then they had to use the virus to get mail-in ballots.
Then they had to steal the election.
Then they had to get Biden in charge.
Then they had to open the gates and flood the country with tens of millions of illegals.
Then those illegals had to start the fires.
Then the fires burned and killed the people.
I don't know how far back you want to take this, but I'll go at least two steps and say anybody responsible for this guy being in the country is as responsible as him for the wildfire that killed 16 people, charged them with murder, and hang them.
Meanwhile, Israel and Hamas near agreement on ceasefire deal, Qatar says.
And yes, everything we said yesterday in all of these topics is being proven right today.
This does turn out to be the influence of the incoming Trump administration.
And it appears as though Israel and Hamas appeared to close an agreement to declare a ceasefire in Gaza and release hostages held there.
The Qatari government, a key broker in the talks, said on Tuesday, raising hopes after more than 15 months of war for some respite in the fighting.
Like everything happened to this conflict, some people are thrilled about this.
Some people are horrified by it.
I'm having a little bit of trouble making heads or tails of it.
We'll get into what people are saying.
Honestly, you can just never know.
I have no idea.
Half the people are like, I can't even explain how convoluted it all is.
The pro-Israel people are mad and they're happy.
The pro-Trump people are mad and they're happy.
The pro-Palestine people.
Are mad and happy.
Like, it's a total coin flip as to whether you like the deal they made or not, but we'll get into it and explain it to you here in just a second.
Meanwhile, we have two stories here.
I think I have both of these, right?
That I think represent not just two good pieces of news, but hints as to our path to victory.
Signposts pointing down the trail at the end of which lies victory.
First story is this.
New Florida bill requires labeling for foods containing vaccines.
Bill SB 196 was filed in the Florida Senate.
Would deem a drug or food misbranded if it contained vaccines or vaccine materials without appropriate labeling.
Good.
And then Ohio approves parents' bill of rights ensuring schools provide notification on sex ed and gender confusion.
Also, very good.
I think this, at this point, not even I think, I'm just telling you.
At this point, the most successful strategy of combating the globalist schemes has been and has been shown to be the state level.
States can ban these things.
We don't have to deal with the federal government, and the corporations doing this don't have the capability of spreading themselves so thin as to combat these efforts in all 50 states.
So you've got Ohio approving the Parents' Bill of Rights, Florida banning vaccines in the food and water, Tennessee banning...
Kim Trails.
I know Idaho just did something similar to Ohio with a parent's bill of rights.
Maybe state level is where the action needs to be and maybe we should be focusing a little bit more on that because I do think to some degree the left has recognized this and is also taking on state politics with a more sincere effort these days.
So that's your Daily Dispatch.
Some good news.
Some bad news.
Some news that I can't figure out, whether it's good or bad.
So, it's just news.
The international news, that is.
Let's just get the fire stuff out of the way.
We talked about it for like two hours yesterday.
Clip number 11. LA's newly hired DA, Nate Hockman.
Oh, Hockman.
H-O-C-H-M-A-N. I was listening to all these videos about Nathan Hawkman, and I kept picturing it spelled H-A-W-K, which I thought was cool, because he sounds like a cool guy.
He sounds like a man worthy of having the Hawk as his icon, his avatar.
Okay, sorry.
D.A. Hawkman.
Wait a second, I lost it.
Announces charges against three criminals who stole...
$200,000 from an evacuated home during the fire.
Here's clip number 11 again.
Just one of many examples of criminal activity following the...
I was going to say natural disaster, but the fires themselves are the result of criminal activity.
So it's just a layer cake of criminal activity there in L.A. And at least one person, Nate Hawkman, seems to be fighting back against it.
Let's watch.
unidentified
And the LAPD, through, again, such impressive investigation, worked with various leads and tracked Mr. Peoples and Mr. Bell to an apartment in Koreatown.
Surveillance was then conducted.
When they attempted to leave, they were then apprehended, and a number of these stolen items from that residence was found with Mr. Peoples and Mr. Bell.
Mr. Peoples is committed to prior violent or serious felonies.
This is his third.
As a potential three-strike person, he is looking at life in prison.
And Mr. Bell, as a second-strike individual, will be looking at 22 years and eight months in prison if convicted.
Mr. Coleman accompanied Mr. Bell and Mr. Peoples out of that apartment building in Koreatown.
harrison smith
Yeah, they're looters.
They're looters and they're going to go to prison for life.
And that's just the way it's going to have to be.
And again, 73 people have been arrested.
More and more videos coming out of people starting fires.
Clip number four here.
Another man has been arrested for arson after he was caught actively lighting fires in L.A. County.
Per Irwindale PD. Here you can see one of the fires is filmed from the freeway.
And again, all these places, like we determined yesterday, using a simple application of logic, all of these fires more or less started in places where people have access to, but there's not a lot of construction going on or power lines overhead or anything that would contribute to the accidental starting of the fires.
I believe I have another video of somebody starting a fire.
I'll show that in just a...
Oh, here you go.
Clip number one.
Lady filmed this a few nights ago in the North Hills neighborhood in L.A. She posted it to the neighbors by the Ring app.
Clip number one.
More people just starting fires.
I screen recorded this last night at 1.34 a.m.
from the Ring neighborhood app.
This is in North Hills.
And it's people lighting trash on fire.
If you see people lighting fires, get anyone you can to help stop these losers.
Okay, we can turn it down on what that screaming is about.
But I'm telling you, I've seen at least a dozen videos of people starting fires or other people stopping fires.
The person filming will walk up to a burning piece of trash and be like, yeah, that dude over there just lit this on fire and threw it in the bushes and ran away.
And so people are just lighting fires all over L.A. I mean, the big wildfires, certainly at this point, it's pretty well established that they are the consequence of people lighting them, whether on purpose or by accident, hasn't been determined yet.
But I think it's on purpose because of, you know, all of the videos of people doing that.
Getting people throwing gasoline on the side of the road.
People just starting fires just out in broad daylight in front of everybody.
Not even shy or trying to hide it.
So, I mean, California is just...
It's just wracked by criminality.
It's just rotten to the core at this point.
Again, wrap your mind around what I'm saying.
LA has been wracked by wildfires.
Entire neighborhoods have been burned down.
And there are at least a dozen videos of random people purposefully starting wildfires posted in the last week.
People are just randomly running around LA starting fires.
It's not terrorism.
It's just insanity.
unidentified
Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
I don't want to spend too much time on the fires, though, because it seems a little warmer than yesterday, but some crazy coincidences are cropping up, and some celebrities are getting in the mix as well, which is always interesting to see.
And on top of that, it's just the fact that it's not even about the fires.
It's about the fact that it's just a trend now.
It's just like what people do, I guess.
If you're bored, don't have anything to do, nothing to watch on TV, you might as well go throw a Molotov cocktail on the hiking trail and just see what happens.
It is legitimately insane, especially since most of these people, most people arrested are illegal aliens or repeat reoffending criminals.
We're just...
We're occupied, folks.
We're occupied.
We're invaded.
We are surrounded, basically, by interlopers who despise us and apparently feel totally untouchable by the law, probably for good reason, because they get away with everything.
Whitney Cummings, I think, is a comedian, right?
Whitney Cummings is a comedian.
She's been posting videos about this, showing texts from her All right, I'm going to read another real dark text to you guys about the LA fires and what people are talking about that you're not seeing in the news.
unidentified
And let me just preface this by saying, I'm not defending LA. I've been trying to get out of here for years, but...
Not everyone that lives here is some idiot that, like, gets their news from, like, Sonny Hoisin on the view or something.
Like, we're here not because we, like, love it.
It's just our parents didn't give us attention.
Our dads didn't want us.
We had to come to L.A. because this is where all the cameras were.
This is where the attention was.
But now we can do this anywhere.
Let me read you this text from a friend of mine who's super smart.
Wednesday on, I'm not going to tell you where, just below my house, a homeless man poured gasoline down the sewer grate and lit it on fire.
Homeless in LA is a very tricky thing.
It's hard to figure out who's homeless and who's not because really rich people dress like they're homeless.
It's just the brand of the clothes they're wearing is like the Olsen twins or whatever.
So when you see a homeless person, it's very hard to tell.
Is that a bomb?
Is that a hobo?
Or is that like a nepo baby?
And then two hours later, out of nowhere, with no burning embers near us, hard to prove that, Runyon goes up.
We watch it from our bedroom window.
A little smoke.
Five minutes later, the whole hill is on fire.
Ten minutes later, we're out of there.
He says, I think someone is trying to encircle Los Angeles.
A few people cashing in on insurance, but someone wants to burn this place to the ground and get the land or cover the tunnels.
Hit my head.
The tunnels.
The tunnels, dog?
We really don't have time to take on L.A. tunnels, so I will.
harrison smith
There you go.
Claims people are trying to put gasoline in sewers in L.A. What's going on?
That's not even what she said.
She said, no, a homeless person.
She said her friend watched a homeless person pour gasoline down a sewer and light it on fire.
Where did they get that quote from?
Trying to...
Trying to pour gasoline down sewer.
It's like, okay.
I gotta wonder what's going on in the heads of the people who are trying to downplay this.
There's something wrong with them.
If I sit there and go, hey, you know, I just saw a homeless person pouring gasoline down a storm grate and then lighting it on fire.
What impulse is it, like, what response would you have other than like, what?
That's crazy.
That's terrible.
We need to stop this.
Who goes, I'm going to cover for the homeless arsonist?
Why would you want to downplay this?
What reason do you have to disbelieve this?
Crazy.
Absolutely crazy.
So yeah, apparently homeless people are pouring gasoline down.
I wonder how much of this could be prevented.
We talk about everything that could be prevented.
You could have water in the reservoirs.
You could do things like create fire breaks and actually Take preventative measures in some regard against the wildfires that crop up every single year like clockwork.
You could do any number of things.
I wonder how much of an effect just personal initiative would have.
Because I've seen a lot of videos as well.
And, you know, from that person's tweet, it's like, yeah, you know, we saw a little bit of smoke rising up from, you know, we're on our back balcony looking out in the green space.
That our house overlooks, and we saw smoke rising up, and like 10 minutes later, there was a fire.
And it's like, why didn't you go out and put out the fire?
I just, you know, I just keep getting this feeling or this sense of you just have these people in L.A. standing on their balcony going, huh, there's smoke rising out of the forest.
Look at that.
It's like 100 feet away.
And they just watch the fire grow.
And they're just like, is anybody going to do anything about this?
Where's the smoke person?
Where's the person in charge of it?
I'm not.
I'm not in charge of this.
Somebody should do something.
And it's just like a very easy, you know, just like tiny little brush fire that you could stomp out suddenly becomes a raging inferno that consumes your whole house.
It's like, where's the initiative?
Where's just the you see a fire, you go try to put it out.
Can do American spirit.
I don't know where it went.
It's not in LA apparently.
Crazy.
Again, there's just like a lot of examples of this where you just keep seeing this.
Fires cropping up and people staying there watching it going, what?
But look, it's on fire.
It's like, go put it out.
matt baker
What are you doing?
unidentified
I mean, it's almost like there's a bystander effect, right?
harrison smith
Almost like there's a bystander effect, yeah.
unidentified
Right, and that's maybe not unique to LA, but, you know, I don't mean to...
Kind of addicted to you here, but I have seen tons of videos of people taking the initiative of, you know, A, staying behind after evacuation notices and trying to put fires out via, you know, their hose, you know what I mean, on their house, which is kind of silly, but, you know.
harrison smith
Yeah, I mean, people protect themselves, but I've just seen a lot of videos.
I mean...
On one side, I kind of get it.
I mean, you don't want to go running into a fire.
Like the video we played yesterday of the guys at the Palisades fire, like running away from it.
I don't really blame them.
You're surrounded by brush, like dry brush, and you see a fire.
You're going to want to get away as quickly as possible.
I sort of get that.
Especially like when it first begins.
And again, I've seen a lot of this.
There's videos of like a fire on the side of a highway, and this kid's pointing it out.
Fire trucks are just driving by, like, not even trying to put it out.
It's so weird.
And it's not just LA. It's happened to me in Austin.
I've literally experienced this in Austin, where there was a fire in a homeless camp right off of a very busy road.
William Cannon in Austin.
It's, like, a very busy, like, four-lane road.
Has tons of traffic.
And this fire had been going.
Like, I saw the smoke for a while.
I'm driving for a long time.
I finally, like...
Drive up to it.
And there's a homeless camp just on fire off the road.
Of course, I'm in traffic, so I just keep...
But I called 911 and was like, hey, do y'all know there's a fire on William Cannon?
They had no idea.
So God only knows how many hundreds of people had driven past and just, huh, that homeless camp is on fire.
Did you see that?
Crazy.
It's like, at least call.
I mean, you don't have to get out of your car and stomp the thing out yourself.
At least put the call in, right?
It's really not hard.
Crazy.
But yeah, this is just like a regular thing, I guess.
Into Thin Air has been covering this quite a bit, and he has a ton of videos.
Maybe we should get him on, that's our friend, Into Thin Air, number two on X. He says, breaking, person caught on camera starting a wildfire.
What do you think?
Many are saying this video captures a person setting a fire, then waiting to see if it would grow on 1-9-25.
I tried enhancing the video as much as possible.
It does look like somebody is standing right next to where the smoke is beginning to flow from.
It does look like there's a figure there that you can see sort of moving around as the fire gets going.
And he posted this.
Wildfire arson update.
They are lighting fires on camera.
We've captured at least 20 different men who all look fairly similar, who have all been caught trying to start or literally starting fires.
No one is doing a thing about it.
Evidence continues to emerge, suggesting intentional acts to start fires within California.
And this is a video of a guy walking around starting a fire in California.
And there are at least 20 of these videos.
Most of them don't go anywhere.
Most of them get put out, but occasionally one takes root and you get the Eaton Fire and 16 people die from it.
So again, I mean, is it coordinated?
Is it an attack?
Is it illegal immigrants?
Is it Chinese operatives?
Is it Antifa acting on orders?
It's kind of impossible to tell.
And at this point...
I don't think we have any reliable information to determine one way or another, but it has to be treated as though it's an attack.
What's the saying?
Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence, three times is enemy action.
It's enemy action.
This is enemy action being taken.
Whether it's in a coordinated fashion or an independent fashion, does not matter.
America is under attack.
Let's go to clip number 12 here.
LA fires.
A little bit too many coincidences to overlook.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Okay, so California's on fire, but we have like the best fire department in the world, right?
We should be able to contain this, right?
I mean, we did, but the mayor cut the fire department's budget last year, so not enough personnel for this one.
What?
Well, I mean, we don't need everybody.
We just need a certain amount to spray the area with water.
Oh my god, I love that you say it.
It's so funny because the state actually depleted its water reserves a couple months ago, so the firefighters literally don't have enough water to fight the fires with.
Wait, that doesn't make any sense.
We're in a drought, and so we depleted our water reserves?
Well, at least the people that have fire insurance will be getting some money, right?
Ooh, this is awkward.
Okay, don't get mad at me, but insurance companies like State Farm has not been allowing renewal of fire insurance policies since two months ago, and it's been canceling a lot of contracts.
So let me get this straight.
Two months before the fire, the state depleted its water reserves.
Insurance companies have been castling its fire insurance policy.
It's like it's Maui all over again.
But it's not like the state needs to free up a whole bunch of land to open up a new smart city infrastructure, right?
Because we haven't announced anything like that, did we?
The L.A. district might have announced plans to set up a smart city by 2028. So it's like Maui all over again.
Yeah.
harrison smith
Except less space lasers this time.
Turns out homeless people work just as well.
This is the dichotomy of the conspiracy.
Either the most advanced secret space-age technology of high-tech, zero-point laser technology fired from a satellite lighting fires, or you give a homeless guy a hundred bucks.
And say, go pour gasoline down that grate and throw a match in.
Either or.
Both of them work, actually.
The same outcome.
Of course, yes, he's right about L.A.'s smart city revamp that they're planning.
Governor Gavin Newsom announced a sweeping plan to rebuild Los Angeles, dubbing it L.A. 2.0, under a Marshall Plan-inspired initiative that signals major changes for the city.
Newsom reveals he's already mobilizing city officials, civic influencers.
Powerful business moguls and labor unions to execute his vision.
He says that the region will be completely reorganized, vowing to seek federal assistance to shape Los Angeles ahead of the Olympics.
This sounds more like a fantasy from the World Economic Forum.
Of course it is.
But it's a continuum here.
It's a constant here.
It's a ubiquitous sense.
There is no meaningful difference between The climate change agenda and the World Economic Forum's plans for humanity and horrific natural disasters.
They're the same.
They're the same thing.
One's a little bit quicker, but the outcome is actually exactly the same.
We covered this a couple years ago with the article that Bloomberg wrote about how South Africa is the only state meeting its climate change goals because it's a collapsing state.
That can't keep the electricity on for half the day every day.
So you can either be a failing state, just reverting to barbarism and incapable of upholding basic high-tech infrastructure, or you can follow the World Economic Forum's plans to build a smart city.
The outcome is the same, it turns out.
And again, to me, it's just crazy that everybody is realizing this.
Do you realize what a world we live in?
That 10, maybe even just 5 years ago, stories about the LA fire would be nothing but climate change.
And if it was 5 years ago, Trump bad.
If it was 10 years ago, conservatives bad.
But at this point, it's celebrities.
It's influencers, just everybody who's paying attention recognizes like, okay, either this is on purpose, done by people who are bad actors with bad intentions to, you know, pull off some greedy scheme of theirs, or it's a disaster that isn't expected but will still be taken advantage of by the evil schemers to fulfill their satanic goals.
Comedian Eddie Griffin.
Claim the Los Angeles wildfires are a smokescreen to destroy evidence of a massive pedophile ring.
Let's watch clip number six now.
unidentified
Hello and welcome to another installment of NNN where we give it to you straight, no chasers.
Let's get right to it.
L.A. is on fire.
Now, a lot of people saying this is to cover up the pedophile trail.
And all of a sudden the water ain't working.
And hold on.
60% of the water rights is owned by this f***ing couple.
What's their f***ing name?
Wonderful.
Yeah, the Wonderful, Wonderful Company.
It's owned by this husband and wife team.
They own pistachio.
They own Fiji water.
I stopped drinking any of that shit around the motherfucking globe.
Let them motherfuckers go broke.
We're feeding the pistachios and almonds and all that goddamn water.
Meanwhile, people's houses are burning down, dying of thirst and shit.
All these sons of b****** and b****** the regulators who allowed them motherf****** to own 60% of the goddamn water.
Fire them motherf****** in the goddamn water.
harrison smith
I thought this whole thing was censored, but he let one slip through, so I'll pull it out, even though that's very funny.
You should be on InfoWars.
Again, I see a lot of speculation about that.
Again, it's just so funny.
Like, the world that we live in, like, I'm on Infowars, and it's like, the culture has shifted so much, I have to be the one going, I don't think this is about pedophile tunnels.
I don't know.
I mean, it could be, but if it's me, I don't think it's about pedophile tunnels in this case.
But that's just me, so...
Because again, I get the impulse.
You see all this stuff happening and you want to figure out what it's about and you know that LA is a den of the most depraved and exploitative individuals that have ever existed.
And so they go hand in hand.
And yeah, there are tunnels.
There are tunnels in every major city.
There's an entire subway system in LA. Here's the thing though.
Here's the thing.
Have you read the P. Diddy disclosures?
Do you remember Harvey Weinstein?
Do you understand that the pedophile problem in L.A. goes back to the 40s and Shirley Temple?
Do you think they need tunnels?
This is the thing.
If you're conscious of the prospect that there might be tunnels for pedophiles to utilize, Then you're good.
You're waking up.
You're aware of things that you're not being explicitly told.
Good.
That's wonderful.
It's time for you to realize how thoroughly corrupt America is and understand that tunnels aren't necessary when the police and the mayor and the civic authorities and the industrial captains who run the city are all in on it.
And flaunt it out in the open.
Like, read the Harvey Weinstein.
There's no tunnels.
They're not using tunnels.
They're using limos and Ubers.
And they're doing it in the top floor suites of the Beverly Hills Hotel.
Like, it's not underground.
They're not in caves.
They're not hiding.
They're in control.
They run the country.
They run the city.
They do it openly.
So, let's just be clear.
Tunnels, not totally necessary.
Okay?
Although now that I think about it, it wasn't exactly this time last year that another tunnel system was discovered.
Is it the Jews?
Are the Jews tunneling under Los Angeles?
And did they burn the city down to cover it up?
That's the thing, girl.
They're not going to burn the city down to cover up the pedophile tunnels.
A, they don't need to cover it up.
They're in charge.
They are just openly pedophiles.
So they don't need to have tunnels for that.
And two...
What would be the purpose?
What would be the use of burning the whole city to get rid of the tunnels?
To do what exactly with the tunnel?
Like, it just doesn't make any sense.
I'm glad everybody's conspiracy theorizing, but it's got to be internally consistent.
The logic has to be sound, and it's just not there for that.
Finally, we'll go to another video, again, documenting just another, is it?
Purposeful, planned, coordinated, designed, or just the natural consequence of evil people running everything.
Clip number nine, huge real estate developer already potentially looking at the devastation area of the Los Angeles Pacific's Palisades Fire.
Let's watch.
unidentified
They're giving away the plan a little too soon.
The fires in LA are not even close to being contained, and speculators already be speculating.
Billionaire Bill Ackman tweeted this out last night saying, quote, If you haven't heard yet, the context here is that California's top insurer canceled hundreds of policies months ahead of the Los Angeles wildfire.
Very sketchy and very messed up, that is for sure.
But think about what Bill is essentially saying here, which is that insurance companies, megacorporations can bully you into moving, making you leave your community, leave your family, leave the place that you grew up in.
He's saying just give up and move.
But I wonder what's in it for Bill.
Is he priming us for something?
Well, it was just announced this morning that Bill Ackman is planning on a takeover of Howard Hughes Holdings, a major real estate developer.
They specialize in something called master planning.
Quote, Howard Hughes does not operate on five or ten-year timelines, but on a timeline that extends 50 to 100 years.
Through large-scale planning, Howard Hughes creates intimate communities that transform large American cities by changing the lived experience.
We develop on a massive scale, changing the landscape of America.
One example, 37,000 acres to build a, quote, "city of the future" in Phoenix's West Valley.
But there are many other examples in their portfolio.
Summerlin, Nevada, Woodland, Texas, etc., etc.
And it looks like a new spot just opened up for Bill.
The newly blank canvas for our master planners.
The point isn't that new development is always bad or evil, but it's that these decisions on how to build a community should be left up to the people who live in that community, not people like Bill Ackman or these master planners who treat society as their little playpen not people like Bill Ackman or these master planners who treat society as their little playpen where Let me explain why he's a little bit wrong there.
harrison smith
James Lee, fantastic stuff.
And I shouldn't even say it like that because he is exactly right about everything he said in that video.
It's just, it is evil.
It is evil what they're doing.
And I'll explain why.
See, goodness creates things, builds things, manufactures things, creates something from nothing.
Evil has to be a parasite on good.
It can't create anything.
It can only corrupt.
So, if they just wanted to build something, if they were just...
You know, these visionaries that wanted to create a town and proved everybody that their ideas would make for a better life.
And if you live in their neighborhood, you would be happy and healthy and it'd be walkable.
And if that's what they want to do, there's plenty of land out there.
I mean, it's America.
We have more land than we know what to do with.
You could build that anywhere.
And if you're right, if your ideas are good, people will come and flock to it.
But their ideas aren't good and people don't want to...
Live in the places that they build.
So out of necessity, they have to take over and dominate and infiltrate and take power over places that are already popular and cool and hip and beautiful.
And then force people basically to live in their neighborhoods.
A good example of this, and it's actually funny, it's where the Truman Show was shot, Seaside, Florida.
That was probably the first master-planned community in all of America.
It was built in the 80s, and it's beautiful and amazing and really unique and awesome.
It's very cool, actually.
But before it was built, it was marshland.
There was nothing there.
And then a developer got an idea, invested a ton of money, took a huge risk, built this place, and it's still thriving.
40, 50 years later and only getting bigger.
That's totally cool and possible and no problem for me.
I'm not about to object to that.
What we're talking about here is the Agenda 2030 smart city plan that requires that this is not a choice that you make.
They aren't offering a better idea for a better life and then asking you to take a chance and come appreciate it with them.
They're trying to take over your city.
That already exists and impose their ideas on an unwilling populace.
And so they need total domination to do this.
And Smart City LA is just one of hundreds of Smart City plans being implemented right now.
And, you know, whether they can knock your house over with a bulldozer or burn it down with a wildfire, it's all the same to them.
They get the land at the end of the day.
Scheme upon scheme upon scheme.
Consuming America from the inside out.
Welcome back, folks.
Second hour of American Journal is on.
I'm done.
I'm done talking about the wildfires.
unidentified
It's over.
harrison smith
Enough already.
unidentified
Jesus.
harrison smith
We'll give you any updates as they come, of course.
We'll see.
We'll see how that goes.
We've got politics, tech, Mideast, and your phone calls to talk about.
What should we get into here?
Uh, let's do this.
Deportations, again, this is another topic as we discussed yesterday, has to be at the top of the priority list for Trump, just out of necessity.
He promised this.
There's no reason not to.
Yes, the left is going to complain and whine and do all sorts of illegal things to try to counteract it.
But this is the trap that they've laid for themselves.
If you go aggressively enough, their own resistance will undo them.
So I'll show you videos here in just a second.
And it's not just the left.
We talked about yesterday, California set aside a $50 million war chest to combat Trump, to preemptively sue the Trump administration over trying to just exercise their legitimate authority and impose law and order as dictated by the Congress and Senate and the laws they write.
They're trying to resist that.
So to me, that's...
Probably illegal.
Like, I don't think it'd be hard to make the case that if you're holding a seminar for people and instructing them how to break the law, that's illegal.
How can it not be?
So, they're so comfortable in their existence now.
They're so thoroughly convinced that they're, like, in charge and will never not be in charge that they think they can get away with this type of stuff.
In the same way that you've got people walking around L.A. Light and fire.
Sorry, I said I'd not talk about it.
I said I wouldn't talk about it.
But I mean, what compels somebody to just be out in the open with people filming you and you're just starting a fire and throwing it away?
It's like they think they're untouchable.
They think they can't, that nothing's going to happen to them.
They've done so many illegal things, they're like, don't even realize what they're doing is bad anymore.
This is where the left is.
They've had such a free pass over the last several years, decades even.
They're like holding seminars going, yeah, if you're an illegal alien, come here and we'll instruct you on how to avoid deportation orders.
If you're somebody who doesn't pay taxes, come here and we'll give a seminar on how to avoid the IRS finding out.
It's like, you can't do that though.
Are you a fugitive from justice?
Come here and we'll tell you how to avoid facial recognition systems.
You know, travel without a driver's license.
This is a gray area here.
But I think this could be their undoing.
And again, I mean, maybe like in the strictest interpretation of the letter of the law, they're staying like a millimeter in bounds.
But I think you could make the case.
I think you could at least make their life a living hell.
You could at least charge them.
Maybe he doesn't get the conviction, but you could put them through the ringer for a couple years.
Teach them a lesson.
I'm serious.
This is what needs to happen.
It's the only thing that can't happen for our country to be saved.
You can't have incredibly well-funded and established networks of criminals cooperating together with the local governments to defy the federal government.
That's not how this works.
We're the union now.
You be the Confederacy.
And we'll crush you.
I really think that's what needs to happen.
You know, it's not like on principle, I think the states have a right to refuse to participate with the federal government when the federal government exceeds its authority and violates the Constitution.
Not in defense of illegal immigrant foreigners that are breaking the law by their mere presence in our country.
That's unacceptable and cannot be allowed to continue.
So I'll go to two videos on the other side.
One of Trump reasserting his...
Dedication to a mass deportation program.
Good.
We'll look at that and we'll also show you videos of just subversive elements in the United States openly bragging about the way they're collaborating with foreign nationals to subvert our constitution and overthrow the authority of our government.
Time to crush them.
Oh, it's so close, folks.
We're six days away, and then it's time to crush them into non-existence.
Welcome back, folks.
The left is still playing their resistance.
They may seem demoralized, but they're still pockets of hardcore.
Orchestrated resistance to the Trump plan.
Which, I thought they were Democrats.
Isn't this democracy?
It's just that's just funny to me.
Because it's like, I mean, whatever.
Just everything they claim to believe in is a lie.
Let's just get that right out in the open.
They're just like, democracy is our highest value.
And it's like, alright, well we held a big-ass election.
Everyone voted.
And Trump won.
And it's his agenda.
And they're just like, we will resist to our dying breath.
It's like, alright.
Okay, so you believe nothing.
You believe literally nothing.
Wonderful to hear.
So California is setting aside $50 million as a war chest to fund...
Lawfare against Donald Trump.
Bureaucrats plan to act as deep state against Trump.
Poll fines.
A surprising number of federal government employees admit they're gearing up to act like a deep state, opposing the incoming second administration of Donald Trump.
Most Americans, even many of the elite who voted for Vice President Kamala Harris, are willing to support Trump's administration, according to an RMG research survey commissioned by the Napolitan.
Yet 42% of federal government managers who work in Washington, D.C. Swamp intend to work against the administration.
42% of federal government managers who work in the Washington, D.C. Swamp intend to work against the administration.
They've conducted these surveys in mid-January, studied three different segments of the population.
The polling firm focused on what it calls the elite 1% who have post-doctorate degrees, earn more than $150,000 annually, and live in dense populated areas.
Main Street Americans, who meet none of these criteria and represent between 70 and 75% of the U.S. population.
And federal government managers, federal employees who live in the national capital region around Washington and earn at least $75,000 annually.
The poll found that Americans are willing to support the new administration even among elites and even among those who voted for Harris House.
However, the federal government elite, the federal government employees make more than $75,000, 42%.
Said they would resist it.
We're going to resist.
You're going to do a bad job, is what you're saying.
And look, this is another, you know, the real Anthony Fauci, you know, I always bring up as an example of this, one of the things where when you really start to look into what has gone wrong in our system, you see how thoroughly corrupted we've been.
It's like if you have an apple and you think a little part's a bit bruised, so you try to cut out the bruised part and you realize the whole apple is bruised and you're just like, oh, I better just throw this apple away.
It's not worth saving.
That's sort of where we're at at this point.
But the psychological reality behind this is these people are only doing this because they think they can.
They think they can get away with it.
They think it's good what they're doing.
They're proud of it.
They're willing to answer polls saying, yeah, I'm going to resist.
I'm going to disobey direct orders from my lawfully elected authorities because I'm the good guy.
And if they thought they would be punished for this, they wouldn't do it.
They certainly wouldn't say it.
They certainly wouldn't openly brag about it and do news reports on it and have public groups where they...
Do this sort of stuff.
You don't even have to arrest all of them.
I think you arrest a few of them.
And I think the rest will get the message.
Because what do you think is the quality and the character of the person who is a lifetime employee of the federal government in Washington, D.C.? Do you think they have a strong conviction?
Do you think they're willing to sacrifice and suffer?
For what they think is right, or are they doing what they're doing because it's an easy and costless way to boost their own social score and receive accolades from their fellow scumbags?
It's easy.
It's pain-free.
It's free.
They're going to do it because they're cowardly little weasels.
The moment you actually go, hey, if you're committing fraud as a federal employee, In other words, if you've taken an oath or you've agreed as a condition of your employment to follow the orders of your superiors and participate in this, you know, the corporate function of our government and you do anything other than that, you're going to be charged with perjury.
You're going to be fined.
You can face up to 10 years in jail.
Like, just basic stuff.
And they wouldn't do this anymore.
And it really would be that simple.
And, I mean, that is the answer.
It's the answer to most of our problems.
Literally just punishing the criminals is the one-stop solution for all of our problems.
Absolutely all of them.
Seriously, that's literally it.
I don't even know if I need to elaborate on that.
I mean, I have examples of this type of stuff, but there are examples every single day in every single city.
But here's a particularly horrifying one.
A 14-year-old boy in New York City was stabbed to death on his way to school by a violent criminal repeat offender who was just arrested for a different stabbing two months ago.
The perp is also the suspect in another stabbing from last Sunday.
Why is he out on the street and not behind bars?
Well, because we don't punish criminals.
That's just not what we do in this country.
We reward criminals.
We punish the people who do everything right.
This is the inversion of our entire country.
If you do everything right, if you behave yourself, and you do all the things that you were raised to think you were supposed to do, you're going to be punished.
Your life's going to be made more difficult at every step.
And the more you do what's right, and don't take shortcuts, and don't screw people over, and don't participate in the dog-eat-dog brutality of modern capitalism, then the harder your life is going to be, the more difficult everything is.
When you're a criminal or a dependent or a foreigner, the world is your oyster and you can do nothing wrong.
So that's just the world we're creating now.
We can choose to do something else.
We can choose to do the opposite.
So it's the same thing with repeat offenders in New York City.
And this is why I feel crazy even talking about this stuff.
You can't even imagine the, like, 1980s dystopian movie where the future, it's a guy like, my suggestion is when somebody stabs somebody else, we should put that person in prison.
And if they get out and stab another person, they should go right back to prison.
Everybody's like, wow, what?
No way, that's a brilliant idea.
It's like, how did we get this, how did we fall this far?
You can stab somebody and be out in two months, stab another person, be a suspect in a second stabbing.
And they still don't arrest you?
Now you've killed a 14-year-old kid?
How many lives do these people have to destroy before we just incinerate them?
I'm not even kidding.
I know we have a three-strike rule.
Can it be three strikes and then you're burned alive?
We need a little bit more oomph in whatever we're doing.
If you're a CEO that has sold out your entire workforce, To foreigners, whether that's illegal immigrants working the chicken packing plant for Tyson or Apple, outsourcing all of its engineering to India, can we throw those CEOs in prison?
Can we rip them out of their private jets, send Marines to helicopter down onto their yachts, haul them away, throw them in chains, and parade them like Luigi Mangione?
Can we do that?
Because I bet every other CEO, I bet as soon as you do that to one CEO, every other CEO in the country issues orders down the chain of command, make sure nobody here is illegal.
Now.
And then it would just happen.
The managers would get that order from the CEO. They'd say yes sir.
They'd hop to it.
Make everybody prove they're a citizen.
If you're not, you're fired.
We've got to hire an American.
Their bottom line would get bumped a little bit.
And then everything would continue as normal except without the...
Interminable influence of millions upon millions of foreigners.
So if we could just punish criminals, a lot of things would be solved.
El Salvador is the best example in the world at this moment.
And we should really be modeling all of our political, I don't know, attempts.
Everything we're doing politically should be modeled after El Salvador because they actually did this and it literally is that simple.
You know, a lot of conspiracy theory, a lot of people who talk trash about conspiracy theories, they're like, they just want one simple, the world's too complex, and it scares them, and they just want one simple idea.
If you tell them it's just one group of bad guys, then it's understandable, and they feel comfort in that, which is absurd and ridiculous in a number of different ways.
But this is one of those cases.
If you just throw criminals in prison, you save infinite numbers of people, and money, and resources, and time, strife, and just general anxiety.
Just throw the criminals in prison.
The criminals that are stabbing children, throw them in prison.
The criminals that are flying migrants all around the country and giving them debit cards, those are criminals too.
The CEOs hiring the illegal immigrants so they can undercut American wages, that's criminal also.
The people organizing conferences where they instruct illegal immigrants on how to evade American justice, that's also criminal.
Throw them all in prison.
Or at least a few of them, and then the rest of them will stop doing that.
I mean, it's really not good.
Just picture a middle manager in some department in Washington, D.C. going, I'm the resistance.
I'm going to resist Trump.
And then, like, the person she works with.
Honestly, you don't even have to, like, do anything.
Just have dudes in black suits and sunglasses and badges.
Show up to the office.
Make them all come to the office.
This will be useful for this.
Have everybody, you know, maybe like an all-hands meeting.
And you have the federal agents come over and they whisper in the manager's ear.
The manager looks up and points to the person's cubicle.
And the men in black walk over and say, we need to talk to you for a few moments.
Do you mind if we use the conference room over there?
And then everybody else in the office will go, oh my god, oh my god.
They'll start deleting text messages.
They're deleting files on their computer.
They'll all flip out.
They'll all immediately fold.
Immediately.
Immediately.
You don't even have to do anything.
Just question them.
Just question these people with two FBI agents that are both over 6'2 and dressed in dark suits.
And then everybody else will just do what they're told.
That's how it works.
42% of the federal government managers saying we're going to resist Trump.
That's unsustainable.
That can't happen.
So we have to do something to counteract that.
Now in the terms of one of the main places where the leftists feel emboldened to commit crimes out in the open in front of everybody, deportations and attempting to resist it.
Trump has reiterated his dedication to mass deportations.
Clip number 15, Trump interview.
Deportations, he says.
We'll be immediate.
Let's watch.
alex jones
Audio.
unidentified
Immigration is the big one, and that's where I wanted to go to next.
donald j trump
How fast do you think Americans are going to see results?
We're going to start seeing deportations.
chase geiser
How fast will we feel what you're about to do?
donald j trump
Immediately.
It's going to be immediate.
We had the safest border in history during my presidency when I turned around and looked at that beautiful chart that came down from Ukraine or wherever it came from.
That was a chart on immigration.
We had the best immigration numbers we ever had.
We're going to have them again.
We're going to have them maybe even better.
But we have to get a lot of people out.
We have criminals at a level that nobody could believe.
Terrorists and, as I said, murderers, people that murdered people.
Many people murdered more than one.
They came from prisons and they came from mental institutions, insane asylums.
There are street gangs from Venezuela and many other countries.
harrison smith
Deportations will be felt immediately.
Good.
Again, I'll say it again.
I'll just keep reiterating myself because maybe somebody's watching today and they weren't watching the other days and maybe this will trickle up somehow.
There's two ways to do this.
Either one is fine and really the only viable...
Path, honestly, if I think about it, is just you just start the deportations as hard and as fast and as vast and as wide-reaching and as aggressive as you possibly can.
You come out of the gate just full-on raids in every major U.S. city on, like, January 21st.
Because you know they're going to freak out.
You know they're going to flip out.
You know they're going to whine and cry.
No matter how gently and softly and politely you do it, they're going to cry.
Okay, so just do what you need to.
And then you can back off a little bit.
Again, Donald Trump's the one who created this way of negotiating, or at least fully popularized it with Art of the Deal.
So hopefully he knows this, but he does seem to be, or at least his proxies seem to be waffling on some of these things.
Like Hohman saying, 1.5 million slated for deportation.
It's like...
In January?
1.5 million in January is a good goal.
Maybe we can double that by February.
And then maybe after a year of deporting 1.5 million a month, maybe we'll have made a substantial impact on the number of illegals in here.
But that's not even half.
Think about that.
If we deported 1.5 million people a month, For a year, that'd be about half of the illegal immigrants that came over in the last 10 years.
unidentified
I don't know about that, man.
I think that's like closer to a third.
I've been reading estimates that it's estimated above 33 million people are here illegally.
harrison smith
Yeah, I would, like, if I had to guess, I'd say at least 50 million are here.
Yes, that's the thing.
Like, you know, 1.5 times 12, what's that?
18. So 18 million.
And do that two years.
So basically, if we could deport 1.5 million people a month for the entire Trump presidency, we're getting close to like four-fifths of the illegal aliens kicked out of this country.
That's what a big problem this is.
When you say 1.5 million people slated for deportation, that's like a slap in the face.
That's an insult.
And again, can't you just imagine?
You guys remember, I don't know, I guess it depends on whether you participated in the lockdown or not.
You guys remember the early days of the lockdown when not everybody was participating and everybody like really got it, but there was no traffic on the roads.
You guys remember how awesome that was?
If you weren't locking down during lockdown, when everybody else was locked down, I just kept doing everything I normally did.
Like we kept coming to work.
I just kept going places like it didn't matter.
And it was amazing.
It was like there was no traffic anywhere ever.
You just run red lights.
There were no cops.
There was nothing.
It was awesome.
It was so cool.
Imagine America with like one-fifth less people everywhere all the time.
We talked about it yesterday with the Walmart that's just like totally empty in California.
It's like usually this place is packed to the gills.
Usually this place is jammed with people.
But then they announced that they're doing immigration sweeps and so all of the illegal aliens stayed home.
And so...
Walmart has no customers.
And you just picture Walmart shutting down and then, you know, whatever new horrifying neighborhood.
Like, when I look around, yeah, yeah, it's like the lanes.
Yeah, exactly.
This is me, early days of the pandemic.
It was great.
Yeah, it's...
It's crazy to imagine.
It's crazy to imagine what we could be doing instead of twisting and cavorting our entire economy to serve a massive influx of tens of millions of foreigners.
It would really look different.
I really think about all the things that just make me sort of hate America.
Not that I hate America, but you know.
Certainly around Austin, there are places where, previously growing up, we'd drive down, you know, whatever, Bee Caves Road or whatever, and you just see this beautiful vista with, like, these little farmhouses, and it looked like a postcard.
It was beautiful.
Now, just houses, just house roofs.
They all look exactly the same for as far as the eye can see, not a tree to be found, just endless concrete and plastic houses, as far as the eye can see.
And it's disgusting, and it's ugly, and it's 100% populated by...
Indian people who got here last year.
So it's like, what?
So what would happen if we didn't have all these legal immigrants?
We could stop building these gigantic neighborhoods of soulless track homes.
We could stop building huge, unseemly Walmart warehouses.
We could go to the DMV and not wait for four hours while 10,000 people that don't speak English get to go before you.
Like, what would America be like?
Without all of these people, these non-American people, and I don't care that they're foreigners, they're not Americans, and our lives are made significantly worse by their presence in this country that we never asked for and that is illegal and that we actually explicitly said should not be allowed.
United Giving Hope is one of these organizations holding workshops.
Let's go now to clip number 16. This is illegal.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Today's protest was but one of the many ways that immigration activists this week are seeking to not just call attention to, but also to educate people on the promises being made by the incoming Trump administration to begin mass deportations of undocumented immigrants starting on day one.
The intersection of 18th Street, Blue Island, and Loomis and Pilsen is a symbolic one in this predominantly Mexican neighborhood.
Today, it is where dozens of people came out to protest Donald Trump's immigration policies a week and one day before he takes office for the second time as president of the United States.
harrison smith
Why are they waving Mexican flags?
unidentified
His border star, Tom Homan, came to Chicago, and he said he's going to come and deport people starting on day one.
It is a promise President-elect Donald Trump made over and over.
donald j trump
Day one, I will launch the largest deportation of criminal program in American history.
unidentified
And it is that promise of mass deportations that led both to today's protest in Pilsen and to this workshop in Waukegan, where following services at United Giving Hope, an immigration attorney was on hand with advice for those who are undocumented immigrants.
To avoid an expedited removal, they should always carry evidence that they've lived inside of the United States for more than two years.
Education, not fear, is the message activists are trying to promote.
Chief among them today was in America.
harrison smith
Waving the Mexican flag.
unidentified
22 years ago.
harrison smith
You realize how conceited and like rude these people are.
I don't know.
Again, you just try to put yourself in their shoes.
And I'm not kidding.
I think.
If you're a foreign citizen and you protest anything in this country, you should be deported.
If you become a citizen, you have all the rights of a citizen, then you have protection of the First Amendment and you get to protest.
The idea that a country would allow citizens of a foreign country to come in and start taking an active effort in changing their political system or getting things passed, that's so outrageous.
It's insane that we allow that to happen at all.
Especially to the degree that we do.
You've got these people who apparently are so scared of getting kicked out of America.
They're just so desperate to be here.
And they're all waving Mexican flags.
This is sort of my view of America.
If America and Mexico are playing in the World Cup, whose flag are you waving?
If it's the Mexican flag, you need to be deported.
If it's the American flag, then you're on our team.
Like, not to take it down to the level of sports, but, like, that really is what it's all about.
Are you loyal to this country, or are you an invader?
Are you a foreigner in your mindset?
You can be from Mexico, but if you're here decked out on the American flag, going, hell yeah, go America, I'm American, great, you're on our team, you're on our side.
side.
If you're here waving a Mexican flag, you're an enemy.
You're an invader.
You should be dealt with harshly and immediately.
unidentified
Welcome back, Coach.
harrison smith
We've got a lot to talk about today.
We'll be joined by Matt Baker and Alex Cargill next hour.
Matt Baker, of course, has produced a documentary about the wildfires in L.A. We're going to talk to him about that experience.
And Alex Cargill is coming on for a little follow-up to our interview about Canadian politics.
And I've seen more and more people come around to Alex's side.
And recognize that Pierre Polyev is not the diehard patriot that he may present himself as.
We'll talk to him in just a little bit.
I do want to tell you to go to Infowarsstore.com right now to get your Survival Shield X2 nascent iodine.
Infowars could very well be mere weeks away from being shut down forcibly by the U.S. government in cooperation with a variety of leftist activist groups.
In a totally fraudulent facsimile of the justice system.
And if that were to happen, Survival Shield X2 will be unavailable forever.
So make sure to stock up now, and you can stock up for 50% off at Infowarsstore.com.
Survival Shield X2 nascent iodine.
I shouldn't even have to tell you about this.
If you're an Infowars viewer, you already know very well the power of Survival Shield X2 nascent iodine from the deep.
And you might want to find out.
If you don't know, if you're not aware, if you're a new viewer or haven't looked into iodine, you've got to check out Survival Shield X2. The craziest thing about Survival Shield X2 is that the dosage size is like two drops.
It's very small.
Normally, if you have a dropper, the dose size will be one dropper full, and so you'll get however many dropper fulls in a bottle.
Survival Shield X2, it's a small bottle, but it's Like, two drops is what you need per day, and, like, that's plenty.
You don't want to overdo it with this stuff.
It's very powerful.
So even though it's a small bottle, it's, like, tons and tons of daily uses there.
Survival Shield X2 now on sale, 50% off.
Stock up while you can, folks, at Infowarsstore.com.
Keep us on the air, in the fight, and be prepared for whatever comes next, which could be anything, up to and including, Nuclear conflict, so you're going to want some iodine on hand for that.
Now, we have a lot of other political stuff to talk about, but I'm going to talk about a couple topics here.
I'm going to try to delicately weave this web together for you because we're going to talk about tech censorship.
And we've got various stories, and they're tied together in the general genre of...
There's also other underlying things happening here that I think we need to be aware of.
One of them has to do with friend of the show, Ian Carroll.
Ian Carroll went super mega insano viral with a tweet to Elon Musk.
So Elon Musk posted a video talking about how wonderful and amazing Israel is.
Ian Carroll responded to him saying, You're exceptionally bad at understanding this one issue.
It's kind of weird.
Now on his...
So Elon Musk responds, what am I missing?
What am I missing?
Now, to me, this is Elon giving a layup.
This is Elon giving a layup, right?
I don't think Elon doesn't know what Ian Carroll's talking about.
Because Ian Carroll's right.
It would be weird if this was the one topic where Elon Musk was totally off base.
That would be...
Strange that that would be the case.
I don't think it is the case.
So, and it's like, even if you didn't, nobody would, no pro-Israel person would do this on their platform.
Just like, you would never do that.
You would never, if you have like an extremely popular account respond to you and go, hey man, you're not saying all the bad stuff about Israel.
No pro-Israel person would go, You think Israel's done bad things?
List them for me.
Tell me what they are.
It's like, okay, here we go.
Here we go.
So that's what happens.
So it's like, you only ask this question as a layup to Ian Carroll.
You think I'm missing things on Israel?
What are they?
Do tell.
And so, of course, Ian Carroll responds with an essay.
I'll go ahead and read you that essay now because I need to establish from the outset that everything Ian Carroll mentions is Verifiable.
Absolutely true.
Undeniably true.
unidentified
And...
harrison smith
Well, first of all, that's all that matters.
Like, I could stop there, and that would be plenty of...
You don't need an excuse to say things that are true.
You can say them for the sake of truth.
That's the beauty of it.
But...
The other thing is, I want to read this to show you how...
thoroughly...
objective it is.
Because what you're going to see is that...
Ian Carroll was doxed over this post and is being called a Nazi because of it.
So I want to read you the post so you can tell me whether you think this is a Nazi dog whistle or if this is rather just a recitation of well-known and globally acknowledged facts about the state of Israel and its relationship with America.
So again, just to set it up, Elon Musk loves Israel.
Ian Carroll's like, it's weird how much you love Israel.
Elon Musk is like, what am I missing about Israel?
And Ian Carroll responds, well, you're missing that AIPAC purchased the seats of about 90% or more of our current Congress.
JFK famously wanted them registered as a foreign agent right before he was shot, and thus they changed their name and never registered.
Why are we letting a foreign lobby buy off our Congress?
That Israel obviously...
He was obviously the state sponsor of Jeffrey Epstein, whose handler was Ehud Barak, ex-head of the Israeli military intelligence.
His funding was Les Wexner, one of the world's richest Zionist philanthropists, and he was accused by ex-Massad assets of being Mossad.
Not to mention the Maxwell connection.
They had blackmail on Clinton and many, many more.
He who holds the blackmail holds the leash.
Just ask J. Edgar Hoover.
That Israel is the only nation who has de facto sanctioned yet actually secret and unsanctioned nuclear program, a program that they stole from the United States looking to the Apollo affair, Numek, the Dimona nuclear facility.
That Jews, Muslims, and Christians lived side by side in peace in Palestine before the Rothschilds purchased the country from Britain during World War I, see the Balfour Declaration, and began their colonial program.
That the groups that founded Israel, Lehigh, Ergun, Haganah, were declared terrorist organizations by Israel itself because their tactics were so deplorable, including bombing British and Palestinian civilians.
Yet these paramilitary groups rebranded to form the IDF and their leadership became the leadership of Israel for the following 30 plus years.
That Israel is a foreign nation halfway across the world that has no business receiving my tax dollars.
Why are we sending them billions of dollars of our tax money while our country burns, is overrun by illegal immigration, etc.
We are told Israel is our greatest ally, so why would they have a massive spy network targeting U.S. government agencies leading up to September 11, 2020?
One, see the Israeli art student's DEA report for copious evidence of Israeli surveillance all across the continental U.S. This is an official government report that cites hundreds of incidents of observed Israeli surveillance teams documented by U.S. government agents all across the continental U.S. And yet we still received zero answers.
Why?
There were numerous fake Israeli moving companies positioned all across the eastern seaboard leading to September 11, 2001. And we have multiple eyewitness reports as well as hard photographic evidence that they knew the attacks were coming at least a day before they did and that they were positioned at a vantage point to photograph the attack up to a half hour before the first plane hit.
Never got any answers, but you can read the official FBI reports about the incident.
I've broken them down live on X before.
That's just a small list of some of the best documented reasons why I, as an American, don't want Israel receiving any of my tax dollars.
and I didn't even mention my obvious objections to the collective punishment, mass surveillance, forced starvations, bombing of refugee camps, brutal murdering of women and children that's been going on on Gaza and the West Bank for years and decades, which you can watch in graphic detail right here on X.
And that's not to mention that somehow we let Congress pass laws outlawing anti-Semitic speech despite our own First Amendment, and we have an anti-boycott legislation in multiple states despite the fact that it's perfectly legal to boycott American companies, just not Israeli ones.
Every content creator knows the fastest way to get demonetized, banned, and slandered is to be critical of Israel.
I figured you would have realized this too after what they did to you and tried to do to X last year.
So there you go.
Bravo, Ian Carroll.
He absolutely blew Elon Musk out of the water with this.
This post now has over a quarter million likes, 257,000 likes, which is the most I've ever seen on a post, compared to Elon Musk's 10,000, which is the post he's responding to, a ratio of 25 to 1, which is pretty incredible.
Then, well, let me just say, so I just read you everything.
He talked about the Demona affair.
He talked about, you know, nuclear program.
He sort of hinted at JFK assassination likely being.
You know, brought about by not just, you know, desire to have nuclear expectors go and look at their nuclear facilities, but also trying to get AIPAC to register as a foreign agent.
He talks about AIPAC buying all of our Congress.
Again, this isn't speculation.
According to Thomas Massey, every congressman but him on the Republican side has an AIPAC handler.
And, of course, they have similar amounts of, let's just call it, influence on the Democratic side as well.
What part of this would you object to?
What part of this do you think, the Ann Carroll's dissertation that I just read there, what part of that do you think was offensive or anti-Semitic or shouldn't be talked about?
Was there any part of it?
Was there anything that was speculative or demeaning or disparaging of Jews?
Anything of the sort like that?
Or is all of that just acknowledged geopolitical history?
It's all acknowledged geopolitical history.
So why would people be mad at this?
What would make you mad at this?
And again, it's not hard to see this from an objective way.
Just picture somebody saying this about the United States.
Would anybody object to somebody listing out some of the crimes of the United States?
Hell, you could even do it with Israel.
If somebody in Israel was like, America's not our friend, and then listed out a bunch of things America's done to Israel.
Would anybody in America go, that person hates Americans?
Like, it just doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't make any sense.
You're allowed to criticize Israel.
Everybody's allowed to criticize Israel.
People criticizing Israel most should be the Israelis, probably.
Just like Americans are the first and most outspoken in criticizing our own government.
It's fine.
It's a government.
Governments are generally bad and do bad things.
And yet, the outrage about this post is...
Unimaginable.
People calling him a Nazi over this.
Now again, even if your goal, even if you are like a Mossad agent and your goal is to protect Israel from criticism, because the whole framework of this is not very complicated to understand.
If the American people don't support Israel, the American politicians won't support Israel, Israel won't get tens of billions of dollars on a yearly basis from America.
And then they won't survive.
So out of a sense of existential national security, they believe that the loyalty of Americans to the state of Israel is paramount.
Okay?
It's really not complicated.
It's very simple.
But does this make Ian Carroll a Nazi?
Does this make him a bad person for recognizing that they're sort of not our allies and probably had a hand in a lot of really bad things to our country?
Of course not.
Of course not.
It's just history.
That's all.
But then you get this account called Awesome Jew at JewsAreTheGoat who then decides to dox Ian Carroll.
Ian Carroll posted this screenshot.
Ian Carroll says, criticize Israel on social media and you immediately get accounts like, awesome Jew, doxing your 70-plus-year-old parents.
Totally not mob tactics.
Something, something, God's chosen people.
Something, something, most moral army.
And again, this is the thing.
If you don't allow reasonable, factual, unbiased criticism of the state of Israel, all that you're asking is for the most extreme voices to take precedent.
I don't know how they don't realize this.
If you don't give a fair shake to legitimate, verified claims about acknowledged history between Israel and the United States, what do you expect?
Do you think people are going to stop talking about it?
Or do you think you're going to make it impossible for any reasonable voices to discuss this issue and come to a reasonable conclusion?
All you're doing...
It's scaring away all the reasonable people.
Anybody that would just want to talk about this in a normal way that we talk about it with any other country, hey, I don't think our relationship with the Netherlands is all that beneficial to America.
Let's discuss the number of things the Netherlands have done to us.
It's fine.
It's normal.
If you let people do that, then we can handle this situation.
We can handle this.
We think that they're not allies.
You think that they are.
We can come to some conclusion as to how America should behave in this matter.
When all you do is criticize and demonize and attack and try to destroy anybody, even very calmly, casually, and with perfect politeness, criticizing the state of Israel, all you're doing is silencing reasonable voices and allowing the unreasonable voices to take precedent.
This should be obvious, but I think that's also part of the tactic, to be honest with you.
I think this is all part of the tactic.
And again, it's a globalist scheme to create a one-world government, and the headquarters will be in Israel.
The situation now is so bad in Israel that the reasonable response is what the globalists want.
This is what they set up.
They set up these problems, and the solution...
Is what they wanted in the first place.
So, like, right now you've got Jewish extremists running Israel, and that's what they are.
And this is one of the things that I've said many times that, again, shouldn't be objectionable at all and is just, like, totally a normal statement if you aren't brainwashed.
Jews have extremists in their ranks.
They're Jewish extremists.
And in all of history, Jews have been some of the, probably the most extreme religious group ever.
More so than the Muslims.
More so than Christian fundamentalists.
You can literally go back to Alexander the Great.
And he's like, holy crap, these Jews are pretty diehard.
And they really are.
You can find stories about the Jews in Alexandria.
The Greeks would go, actually, we're going to limit your feast day.
We're going to limit your feast celebration by a day.
And the Jews just burn the city down.
They're just like...
You know, absolutely not.
Because, you know, in the Jewish mindset, it's like God has given you commandments.
That is superlative.
Nothing else supersedes that.
So there's no like, oh, well, you know, we'll just let this, you know, group of people that rule over us just like break our covenant with God.
Like, no, that's not going to happen.
They're going to do whatever they have to and resist to an insane degree.
Which, again, is like an admirable thing.
I mean, you read these stories about Jewish resistance to the Romans.
And it's like, man, they never stood a chance, but they also never gave up and put up a hell of a fight.
It's crazy.
It's crazy.
So, they're Jewish extremists.
They're some of the most extreme religious fanatics in the world.
And some of them run the country of Israel right now.
And obviously, it's not a great place to be a Muslim or a Christian at this point.
And so it's like, okay, well, what would you rather have?
I don't know.
Maybe Israel should be just kind of like an international city where like...
All religions are welcome, and oh, right, that's what the globalists want.
Oh, right, that's the idea.
That's the ultimate goal.
It's to actually destroy the Jewish control of Israel and make it a one-world government capital of people of all races, colors, and creeds, when in reality it'll be the one-world government that's just controlling everything from there.
So I think it's all part of the plan.
I think all the anti-Semitism, a big chunk of it is desired by the people that want to bring this about.
But I want to explain something very apparent, like totally undeniable.
I'm telling you this from firsthand experience.
And people ask things.
Somebody was like, don't you know, let me just say it outright.
Jews are allowed to dox you on X. That's...
That's one of the things that they're allowed to do.
It's called Jewish privilege.
They get to dox you on X. That's what they're allowed to do.
My theory is that either X as a whole is infiltrated at the managerial level by agents of Israel, or they're somewhere down the line, somewhere in a managerial level or even just an engineering level, X is infiltrated by Israeli operatives.
100% is absolutely true, and I'll give you a couple examples of this.
One thing, the H-1B visa conversation that exploded like three weeks ago, and Elon Musk was freaking out, and he was putting out these texts going, we are banning, we are nuking entire networks out of sight, and all the Groypers got banned, and a bunch of people got their check marks removed.
If you look at the list of people that actually had their verification removed during that crisis, none of them were the lead agitators about H-1B visas.
None of them were the anti-Indian posters.
It was all the anti-Israel people.
So all I can think that happened is you've got Elon Musk having this very public meltdown where he's yelling about banning people and he's sort of making a fool out of himself, banning accounts that ratio him and making it really obvious how censorious he can get if he thinks people are banning accounts that ratio him and making it really obvious how censorious he
And while all of this is going on, somebody at Twitter sees their chance and is like, OK, I'm going to ban all of these anti-Israel people and it'll get all mixed up in this conversation about H-1B visas.
And nobody will even notice that it's all the Israeli people that got banned.
I mean, literally, it was like Suleiman and Dr. Lupus and Jake Shields and Stu Peters.
It was all these people who were not the big Indian, anti-Indian people.
They were not the biggest voices in the anti-Indian H-1B visa conversation.
They're the anti-Israel people, and they all got banned.
To me, this means, okay, there's somebody who at Twitter has been wanting to ban these people, hasn't had an opportunity.
Suddenly this opportunity arises with Elon Musk freaking out and going, I'm banning people.
And so you ban them and everybody goes, damn you, Elon.
He's banning people over H-1B visas.
No, definitely not.
The other reason I say this with absolute certainty is because I have been doxed by a Jewish network on X. I reported it and I got responses saying they did not violate the Rules of Twitter and the posts are still up and the accounts are still up.
So it's like this isn't even speculation.
This isn't anti-Semitic.
I'm telling you from personal experience, Jewish organizations, Jewish individuals can dox you and they say it's because they're Jewish.
They say, yeah, you talked bad about Israel.
So now we're doxing you and threatening you and, you know, threatening to do things to your kids, like horrible stuff.
And I report it and I get a note back from X saying we have a human has, you know, surveyed this and decided that.
No rule has been broken and it stays up.
So yeah, Jews are allowed to dox people on X. That's just a fact of reality.
And so either X itself is just fully captured and they're just allowing this to happen on a managerial scale or it's just employees at X who are doing this and they're the ones that receive the reports and they get to choose.
Oh, it's a Talmudic network doxing somebody for offending Israel?
No violation there, okay?
So again, this is personal.
They did it to me.
So it's not even like, you know, call me whatever you want.
You're not the one getting your home address posted with your next on it.
So I am.
So Awesome Juice says, I've removed the post suggesting Ian Carroll is a fake name.
It appears that Ian Carroll indeed is his real name, and he lives in his parents' million-dollar home in Bellingham, Washington.
His parents, blank and blank, both work as professors at blank and reportedly sued the blank.
So he gives out his parents' Home address, where they work, what they do.
This is doxing.
This is what we call doxing.
Now, Awesome Jew says, poor little Nazi, when Ian Carroll complains about this, he says, poor little Nazi.
Yeah, you're a Nazi for talking about acknowledged facts of Israel.
He says, poor little Nazi, do you even know what doxing is, Ian?
You're the one who brought up your parents on your own social media.
I never posted any information that you didn't already share yourself, and I most definitely didn't dock your parents' address.
No one cares if you are simply criticizing Israel.
We care about your degenerate Jew hatred.
Also, why do you attack me and then block me?
Why are you such a coward?
Now, the weird part about this was I found this tweet because it was reposted by, like, Ron Coleman, who's, like, a respected right-wing person.
So like this is where the loyalty lies and it's bad and this is bad.
It's bad that this is allowed to happen.
It's bad that this is allowed to continue.
Obviously, this person is patently dishonest.
All you have to do is ask them, okay, we'll then post your parents' names and location and where they work.
He probably won't do that.
He probably won't do that because it's the type of thing that you only post if you want them targeted for some reason.
So, this is a big problem, and it ties in, it dovetails with the ban of TikTok.
As we know, as we've covered many times, it's the TikTok anti-Semitic material, the anti-Israel material.
It is the videos of Gaza that got TikTok banned.
And there's this video that's gone viral.
I'll have to play it in the first five minutes of the next hour so we can play it in full.
But it's the same thing that happened with the college presidents who got kicked out because they were allowing anti-Israel protests on their campuses.
In that case, conservatives took the blame.
They said it was an anti-DEI attack, and the president was taken down by conservatives who were proud to take the blame for that.
TikTok, same thing.
It's being blamed on Republicans and conservatives for national security because China bad.
It's about Israel.
It's protecting Israel.
And if you don't understand that, then you're going to be off the mark and you're going to be arguing something that doesn't actually matter, like arguing about...
You know, the Inflation Reduction Act, arguing about inflation when the Inflation Reduction Act is a climate change bill.
You're arguing over the cover story here.
The same way that if you're arguing about Elon Musk banning people over H-1B visas, that's the cover story.
That's not actually why these people were banned.
It was not the anti-Indian people that were banned.
It was the anti-Israel people that were banned.
So Israel does things and then covers up with some claim about national security or something.
People argue over that.
Totally missed the point.
I'll show you the video on the other side.
Welcome back, folks.
Again, we'll be joined by Alex Cargo here in just a minute.
I do want to finish with this topic.
I hope people are seeing the through line here.
And it really is as simple as just like looking at reality for reality's sake.
So it's the same way.
I just see a lot of similarities between this and really everything that we cover.
Things like the COVID outbreak, where it's like, if you heard the officials, they were just telling you over and over, this was naturally occurring, it wasn't a lab leak.
But if you just looked at the information, you just went, oh, it seems to have cropped up right next to this lab.
It looks like that lab was doing gain-of-function research.
Okay, it probably came from the lab.
Just don't listen to these people.
Just don't listen to the liars.
It's really not hard.
Just think for yourself.
So, with the TikTok ban, there was an attempted TikTok ban a couple years ago.
It didn't go anywhere.
It's like, well, it's...
It's China, you know, pumping propaganda out.
Well, so what?
We're going to let them do it.
Okay, well, it's China is deliberately feeding American children, demoralizing content and transgender content and homosexual content.
It's deliberately perverting our children.
Yeah, well, nothing we can do about that.
China has all this.
It collects all this data.
TikTok collects all this data that's sending back to the Chinese government.
That could be a national security issue.
Yeah, well.
So what?
Free speech.
We have to deal with it.
Nothing ever happened.
Then October 7th happened.
And then it's, well, TikTok is letting people upload images out of Gaza and reporting on what's really going on on the ground there.
Well, ban it.
Well, now we have to ban it.
And within a week, the bill was written and passed.
And TikTok was slated to be banned.
Now that ban still might be upcoming.
It's been paused.
But people are arguing and they're interpreting this through the lens of the claim that this is about national security.
It's not.
It's about criticism of Israel.
So if you don't know that, And you're gonna be like this lady.
It's a TikToker named Soupy that had this video go viral about the banning of TikTok.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Fascist countries ban apps.
Fascist countries ban websites.
Fascist countries ban apps and websites under the guise of threats to national security.
When every other country knows.
It's about suppressing the free speech of its citizens.
If the government believes that a single app could, quote from the hearing on the 10th, skew the perspective of American citizens to be anti-American, maybe the real problem is that American citizens are already maybe the real problem is that American citizens are already in such a state of political unrest and unhappiness that our government is scared.
A single foreign influence could tip the scale and have it all be over.
Don't you think that by taking away the, and I quote, key communications channel of Americans, it's gonna make those 170 million Americans a little more anti-American?
Maybe Congress knows and understands that.
Maybe the government knows that the backlash it will receive from banning TikTok does not outweigh the threats that come with its existence.
Not in a matter of national security, but in a matter of being the most popular news and media outlet that the government cannot control.
Like American-owned broadcasting networks and publications.
Maybe if this was actually a national security concern, the government would be banning I think she's exactly right about most of what she's saying.
harrison smith
It was actually national security and Chinese influence.
That was the reason TikTok was taken down.
Do you see what I mean?
If you're off the mark, if you don't get why these things are actually happening and what's really behind the banning of TikTok, the firing of...
Presidents from Ivy League universities, the banning or de-verifying of people on X. If you think these things are about H-1B visas or DEI or national security, then you're just arguing the talking points.
The reality is these things are done in the behest of Israel.
So reinterpret that entire video with that as the understanding.
And she's right.
A secondary positive effect for them is that people will hate America more.
That's not a problem.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal.
I remind you, go to the Info, or go to, I'm sorry, Infowarsstore.com.
Infowarsstore.com.
Get Survival Shield X2 at 50% off right now.
Stock up while you still can, folks.
Survival Shield X2, nascent iodine, available for half off now at Infowarsstore.com.
With that, and no further ado, let me welcome Alex Cargill.
If you're looking to get a finger on the pulse of Canadian politics, you can follow him on X at TransSplendor.
Alex Cargill, welcome back to the show, sir.
alex cargill
Hey, Harrison.
Thanks for having me on.
Great to be here.
harrison smith
My pleasure.
This is sort of a follow-up interview.
Last time you were on, correct me if I'm wrong, I think there were rumors swirling about Trudeau's resignation, but at the time he hadn't announced anything.
Since then, he's announced his resignation, but he's not.
Fully resigned yet, right?
He said, like, I'm going to resign, and he gave a few weeks for his party to find a replacement.
What is the latest in the strangeness that is Canadian politics?
Well, what's the latest to have happened?
alex cargill
Yeah, the latest is he's prorogued our parliament, which means that all the—it's actually good in a way for some of us, but basically he's halted the affairs of parliament.
Until a new leader succeeds him.
So he is now, he's still in charge of the day-to-day rotted, corrupt edifice that he's created.
But until they have an election of a new leader, because we vote for the party, not the person in Canada.
And until they have a new leader decided, the government is pro-rogue.
Or it's at least pro-rogue till March.
So it's good news for some of us because many of their bills are horrendous.
The Online Harms Act, which was going to police.
Free speech online and lock you up for words, much like Britain model is the way that Trudeau's trying to go.
Those bills have all died on the table now because he's pro-rogue.
Basically, he needs to buy the party time to head into a next election with someone that's not him so they don't get decimated down to one or two seats or even no seats.
They need a new captain of the ship, and right now they're giving time for all the...
Serpents and billionaire-funded puppets to line up and say, I could be the next one.
Enough people will vote for me to keep this viable.
harrison smith
I could be the governor of the state of Canada.
I mean, how much is Donald Trump's talk about incorporating Canada into America?
I mean, is that having any impact at all in Canada right now?
alex cargill
Huge impact.
His rhetoric is basically waking up a child that hasn't done their homework for the whole semester, and it's basically saying, you've got to get to school now and you've got to write the exam.
So he's just scurrying, like saying, oh, what do I need to do to actually maintain a functioning country and defend my borders and conduct all the affairs of government properly?
Trump has fast-forwarded that process by making everyone realize what you need to actually have a functioning country.
And they're all in shock, and they're all worried that the sheep that they have lulled to sleep by state-funded media.
We'll wake up because Trump is shaking them awake and saying, you've worked with all the Globos that were trying to destroy me, time immemorial.
It was Canada that brought SARS-1 and the Ebola virus out of our high security lab in Winnipeg and brought it to China to join Fauci and that gang of great guys that were, you know, everyone still treats like it was an accident that happened over here.
Canada has been working hand in glove with the United States and all the clandestine activities.
That your rights may protect you from.
They can subvert that by working through like London and MI6 and Steele and Dear Love before him with the dossier.
So Canada has been a hand of the glove of deep state working against Trump.
And now he's mad at all the puppets up here.
And he's sick of being surrounded by them.
And it has prompted us into this state of going, OK, we're probably going to get absorbed because Canadians hate us, too.
And now they see light at the end of the tunnel.
They're starting to consider, well, we would have actual rights of free speech if we were an American state.
So I've heard some very smart people that are now considering the 51st state rhetoric as some pretty serious stuff, as if it's in our control, as if KAN is capable of doing or defending anything right now.
We've been asleep far too long.
harrison smith
It's so interesting how everything is being shaken up right now.
And I have to give you credit because, you know, obviously you are not the biggest Pierre Polyev fan, and that causes quite a bit of consternation on X as I see it.
You're sort of constantly battling people.
That are saying, you know, we gotta just seize on this Polyev character.
He's our only chance.
We gotta stick to him.
But more and more, I've been seeing people post videos of Polyev going, maybe he's not the real deal.
Maybe he's not who we think he is.
So more and more awareness is being gained of sort of the game that Pierre Polyev is playing.
And more and more people are...
Seemingly starting to wake up and go, wait, this guy a couple years ago was saying everything opposite to what he's saying now.
Who is this guy for real?
Are you noticing that shift?
Is that something that I'm just seeing because of my ex-feet?
Or do you think that's actually a force that's out there?
People going back and finding these old videos of Pierre Polyev and noticing he's not quite as clean-cut and nationalist as he portrays himself now.
alex cargill
Right.
Many, many, many of our influencers that pretend they're MAGA as hell are really Ron DeSantis supporters in Canada.
And the operation favors them and gives them engagement and the legacy news will mention them.
So Pierre's a lot more relative because he's mentioned on the news when automated polling calls Canadian home and say, which party will you vote for?
They don't even list the People's Party of Canada, our only populist option.
Because we got 5% of the vote last time.
The Green Party got 2%.
Yet they mentioned the Green Party on these automated polling that they do Canadian households with.
So they've been thinking that it's the best they can do.
It's a really complex sign-up that's been run on Canadians, where this carbon tax is a real bane in our existence.
And it doubles.
It just keeps doubling every certain number of years.
So it's designed to be hell on earth, to say, oh my God, how do I get out of this?
Which is why Pierre positions himself as, I'll end it, just say the word, brave heart, and I can make this end.
And so that's what Pierre's standing there ready to do.
But it's convincing us that this synthetic problem that they brought up makes us forget, oh, there was a COVID genocide.
Oh, this guy wants endless war in Ukraine.
He wants to support Ukraine forever.
He wants direct flights to India.
He wants, like, Trudeau in some areas wants to deport more people than Pierre does because he's pandered to so many audiences for so long.
But he speaks really nice on a couple of issues.
And he sounds like he's fiscally minded because standing next to a ravenous socialist, everyone looks pretty good.
So he gets this credit for looking really good at getting out of Trudeau.
But under the surface a little, it's just another trick.
And more and more Canadians are getting out of it.
But many of the things you see are synthetic created bots.
Thousands of thousands of them.
They don't have pictures.
They all say the same thing in unison.
It's designed the same way they said, Trump told 3,000 lies.
Don't look into it.
Who has time to look into 3,000 lies?
Just trust us that he's a liar.
That's happening in Canada, and we only have one out of ten of our citizens are truly patriotic, where you at least have five.
So it's much harder for sides to work on you guys.
harrison smith
Yeah, well, and you brought up the immigration issue.
Obviously, Canada, I mean, it's crazy what's happened in Canada.
Canada, if you see some of the cities that have just been swamped by Indian and Chinese immigration over just the last few years.
And this is one of the things that I was wondering, it was sort of right before Trudeau resigned, he started to go, "Hey, you know, we need to pump the brakes a little bit and we might need some deportations." And it was like, okay, was this his sort of last ditch effort to try to move to the middle of the road a little bit and try to have a reasonable position?
I mean, what is the situation with immigration right now?
Is Trudeau really the better option in terms of immigration than the conservatives at this point?
alex cargill
They're ideally, they're the same.
It really is the same.
I mean, they have god-awful levels of immigration, hundreds of thousands of people a year, which ends up being a million a year.
Everything they project ends up being more.
There's the ones that aren't documented properly.
Our hotels are full of refugees that are just staying there indefinitely.
I remember an audit on one hotel, something like $100 million being spent a year to house people with no plan for them and to provide for them.
It is Cloward Piven designed to destroy our society.
And there's no adequate reason provided.
Pierre Polyef could really simply, you know when you're talking to a populist, they come out and they speak against the narrative very easily, and it gets dismantled.
But Pierre, when faced with this immigration crisis...
Does like this surgical talk of like, well, it needs to be a math equation.
As long as I partner with BlackRock, State Street, and Vanguard to make very tiny houses and super high-dense living downtown and a managed transit route centrally planned like China, we can have these people.
I don't see a reason why I need to say no to anyone.
We just got to make sure they have little boxes to live in when they get here, like the rest of you.
And by the way, I want to meet Paris targets.
So you're all going to have to share vehicles.
You're all going to have times where you're not allowed in this section of the city.
Smart cities are coming with Pierre, and that's the part that they don't tell you about.
So it really is hell on earth if you go with Pierre.
And they both have platforms that are god-awful civilization-ending levels of immigration.
And then they get the news to say, well, they're tampering down.
They're going from 500,000 to 365,000.
That is still across the threshold of civilization ending when Canadians don't have a chance of getting jobs right now.
harrison smith
Absolutely.
And again, you know, This is American Journal.
We're talking about Canadian politics, but there's something so, like, it's just like it's on display in Canada and the UK and Germany and France.
It seems like the establishment is losing across the board in all these places.
The French and German government have both collapsed.
The UK is in total turmoil right now with the Muslim rape gang, you know, stuff that they're talking about.
Canada also obviously going through some major vicissitudes.
And it's like, okay, clearly they've realized that they're not popular and they can't keep going down the path they're going down.
So it only makes sense that they change their tactics, shift their strategy, and go, if you can't fight them, join them.
We're going to be our own controlled opposition and present so-called conservative options that fulfill all of our desires anyway.
I mean, this seems pretty obvious to me observing it from afar.
But maybe talk a little bit about that.
The way that the globalists have, Oh, for sure.
alex cargill
I mean, Klaus Schwab bragged that we've penetrated both the cabinets.
He was talking about Canada.
We had a report from CSIS saying that for the last 40 years, and we've only oscillated between our two major parties, and there's a third one that could come in if they get enough support with the NDP, which is far, far left.
And CSIS has admitted, that's our NSA and FBI. And they have said that for the last 40 years, we've been the jewel in China's crown.
They act with impunity.
They buy up our resources.
They completely own us, and they have impunity.
The ones that stole the viruses from our highest-level lab, they were treated like, hey, they've got workers' rights.
Let's not look for them after stealing SARS-1 and Ebola from our lab, y'all.
They have a right to exist, and maybe they'll take it up with their management.
Like, they get this special class system because we appoint the heads of our investigative bodies like you guys do in the United States.
And you see where that's led you.
I hope Kash Patel is the real thing.
But that's the exciting part of American politics is you're going to find out real fast who has the goods.
And you already reported on J.D. Vance.
That scared the life out of me, hearing him say that type of stuff about January 6th.
harrison smith
Right.
Right.
But it's, you know, again, I think we talked about this last time, how, like, I'm a little bit torn because...
You know, it's like, we want to win, we want to succeed, so, you know, Trump's our option, J.D. Vance's our option, then they sort of waffle on some of these things, and they're in favor of H-1B visas, and they're saying, well, 1.5 million deportations, that's a big number.
It's like, okay, we want you to go a lot harder, but at the same time, you're the best we got.
I mean, what do you say to that argument with Pierre Polyev, where it's like, hey, we just want to win, and this guy's as good as, even though he's not perfect, he's as good as we have.
So, you know.
What's the problem?
I mean, we've got to take steps forward.
And again, it's similar, but obviously different in America.
It's not exactly the same, but there is sort of a similar energy.
I think Trump's better and definitely a legit guy.
I mean, he got shot in the head for Pete's sake.
So, you know, he's more real than Pierre Puglia, but there's still that dichotomy.
Do you see that as well?
alex cargill
Yeah, I mean, there's a certain amount of glitches you're going to abide because they have to exist in a swamp.
And you can't turn against every snake at once.
There's 2,000 knives at your back.
You can't take on all 2,000 at once.
You're not Neo.
But how many glitches do you say are adequate?
I mean, Trump wasn't on the WEF website in 2021. Trump doesn't, you know, project onto another populist option that they're WEF, while members of the Conservative Party are active WEF members.
Like Pierre Polyev's mentor is a best friend of Hillary Clinton, WEF superstar John Baird.
So there's many more glitches.
Pierre Polyev wants to stay in the Paris Accord because he wants to bring about the Paris targets, not through taxation, but through turning us into smart city, to getting us off.
Fuel, getting us off gas-powered cars and getting us onto the grid, which he knows we can't account for unless we're planning on building 20 power plants in the next year, which is not possible at all.
They have no design to let us have cars.
We will own nothing and we'll be happy with beer.
And the Conservatives have never been to the right of centre.
They have always marketed themselves.
As more efficient liberals.
We'll hit Paris targets faster.
We'll get you vaccines faster.
People talk about Justin Trudeau invoking the emergencies measures on people that went down to protest.
The Conservative Party, with Pierre nodding his head, he wasn't the leader yet, but he was nodding his head to O'Toole, said we should invoke the Emergency So War Measures Act.
Like, treat us like, you know, Japanese subverters after Pearl Harbor, anyone who doubts vaccines.
He was in favor of invoking it at the outset of COVID because they had this analogy of...
We're going to combat COVID like you combat a war.
So they're complete globalist evil.
And the only reason so many Canadians, even the patriots, are believing it is because, one, half of them are paid off.
Half of them are directly sponsored by the CPC. The other half just like the engagement because it's so easy to hate Trudeau that you literally can have a 60 IQ. And as long as you tweet all day, I hate Trudeau.
Man, Pierre looks good.
I hate Trudeau.
Man, Pierre looks good.
You'll get thousands of retweets.
So they're just, you know, trained rats hitting a button to get their pellet of food for the day.
And until we actually do work, until we build our own healthy non-UN pillar, we will be knocking out the Trudeau UN pillar and installing the Pierre Polyev UN pillar.
harrison smith
Right.
Wow.
Yeah.
So that's very well put.
I got nothing to add to that.
I think you're exactly right.
And then you wonder how much the algorithms are tweaked to reward that, right?
You don't know how many anti-Trudeau, pro-Polyev posts are being boosted.
pellet of food i think that's exactly right now this story was from uh today uh and and again it's like i see this as victor i don't know your interpretation canadian pm justin trudeau blames political right and social media for global anti-incumbency movement and i don't really know what to have called it yet i think that's a good sort of title the global anti-incumbency movement
in other words the global anti-establishment movement i mean the enemy our enemies are acknowledging our our swelling success our rising domination politically across the entire western world canada america and and all of western europe and But people have a hard time sort of understanding how this is winning.
Can you help to illustrate to people this is what winning looks like?
We haven't won yet.
We're not crushing the libtards under our boots.
We may get there eventually, but we have been...
Dominated for so long.
Now we're pushing back.
There's a global swelling movement of people who are sick of the way things have been for so long.
And this is just the hallmarks of victory and the beginning of victory.
How do we seize this victory?
How do we recognize it?
And then how do we maximize the potential of it?
alex cargill
Yeah, when the tyrants are at their most desperate, they've cloaked themselves in this woke ideology that makes the far right the boogeyman of everything.
In Canada, unfortunately, it is kind of part of the PSYOP still.
It makes Pierre behave as more of a lefty to avoid being crucified in the media because what guides the Conservatives is we have to win Toronto and we have to win Quebec, so we have to pretend we're Liberals as well.
So it keeps him in check.
And there's also something like the reason People's Party of Canada hasn't had runaway success in Canada right now.
It's because there is a black pill movement and a blue pill movement.
The blue pill is you go with Pierre and you hope that the Matrix will somehow reform itself if you work within the Matrix.
The red pill is leaving the Matrix and having your own populist party, even if you're demonized in the media.
But there is a black pill movement that takes advantage of the brave men in Canada who conflate populist politics with establishing politics and say, there's no politics that are going to get us out of this, man.
unidentified
Let's head for the compound, make like J6, sons of Odin, proud boys.
alex cargill
Let's go that way.
At least we'll hold our self-respect.
I'm not voting for any of these fools.
And it leaves the only option just without resources being the red pill.
That you don't need to, because what they've set up is, oh, we want to get all these guys that are into the Hitler was right stuff.
And then we want to use the mass migration of people that hate Israel to come over here, paint swastikas.
On synagogues.
That's actually true to those new Canadians that are mainly doing that or maybe false flagging Jews themselves.
This has been documented that they have done this to generate sympathy because we are in a victim Olympics in the West and we believe in this woke, oppressive, persecutor status thing.
So what they'll do is the problems of the migrants that are being brought in here who absolutely hate the existence of Israel are going to be put on the backs of anyone who chose to take that black pill and became A proud boy, son of Odin, all that.
And it gives Trudeau what he wants, which is a boogeyman, because they've created the demand in the government-subsidized media that you need to watch out for these guys.
So I don't need to get into the rhetoric of, oh, how right was Hitler?
Because that's putting yourself on the trapdoor in Jabba's palace.
There's no need to do that.
You can't have controlled language.
You don't need to walk into the alligator's mouth.
You can just take the red pill, peaceably assemble, and win the ID politics war that you've been entered in by subverting all their mechanisms and saying it doesn't matter.
What race you are, what religion you believe in, we believe that our country should be Canada only, and we shouldn't be giving away our money to teach people in Africa how to not poop on beaches.
harrison smith
Right.
I mean, you're not exaggerating reading hyperbolic.
I mean, that's the type of stuff that you're spending money on.
I was just talking about this with Ian Carroll.
He writes this long essay about things Israel has done to America, and it's very reasonable.
It's all totally verifiable information, and yet he's called a Nazi.
And my point was like, This is the problem.
When you exclude all the reasonable voices from being able to discuss this stuff, the only people that are going to be left are the most extreme voices.
It's going to make that side look bad.
You're never going to get anything done.
You have to allow criticism of this stuff or open conversation.
Otherwise, you give all of the power to the most extreme voices because all the reasonable, upstanding people are going to avoid that topic at all costs.
It's a feedback loop.
The Canadian parliamentary system, obviously, it's more similar to systems they have in Europe.
Is that a better system for small parties, I wonder?
Because America, it's Democrat-Republican.
I don't see that changing anytime soon.
The parties can shift what they believe in, but they're pretty much there to stay.
Parliamentary systems are a little bit different, right?
Is there a path forward for PPC because it's a parliamentary system?
Is 5% of the vote enough to get a little bit of power and start as the nucleus of something bigger?
How does the parliamentary system differ from America, and how does that play into your strategy?
alex cargill
It's pretty bad.
I mean, at 5%, at 8%, we've become a major threat to the CPC winning, in their eyes at least.
I believe that it's the people who haven't voted in a totally black bill that are coming back to the table because there's something that actually represents their views of PPC. But yeah, it is a weird thing, but I also think it's necessary.
You can't win unless most of the people you live around believe in something that's real.
And right now, I have no illusions.
8 out of 10 Canadians injected themselves with Tide Pods when the government told them to.
We must take baby steps.
We must accept where we are.
And it's not like you're going to control the chess pieces for long if the culture is still horrible with 7 out of 10 Canadians are just ready to hate you.
You're going to inherit an infrastructure and an edifice of corporate corruption that Trump had to go through where no one's working for you.
They're all working to destroy you.
The first phone call Trump had was leaked out of context to just cause him problems.
So it's not like this is going to be a decades-long battle.
And it really is.
All I care about is the group.
I don't care about the system of voting.
I don't believe in a banana republic.
You vote your way out.
But I do believe that they hate the idea of Canadians peaceably assembling to choose a new way and to build a culture from this party that will be contagious because people are getting sick of living without hope and being betrayed back and forth.
We go red, we lose.
We go blue, we lose.
So it's Canadians' chance to do it themselves and build a community.
And we can't control pieces on the chessboard while eight out of ten Canadians are self-injecting asbestos.
So it's not—we need to build right now.
And it's not a time where I think we have the power to take power anywhere.
It's a time where we can survive and build a culture.
harrison smith
Look, I think that's a very clear-eyed view, and I think you're exactly right.
And, you know, the way you put it is—it just makes perfect sense to me.
It's very compelling.
And look, Canada— I mean, my God, the number of stuff that we report on Canada, the assisted suicides, one in 20 people now being killed, like one out of 20 of the deaths last year were assisted suicide in Canada.
Horrifying.
The anti-free speech bills that I guess are dead in the water now, but are certainly coming down the pipe for Canadians.
It's like this is really an existential crisis and if you're not thinking about it in a long-term way You're just trying to get that feel-good victory in the immediate future You're selling yourself down the river when you really look at what a dire situation Canada is in Thank you as always my guest Alex Cargill follow him on Thank you, as always.
Incredible stuff.
Incredible stuff.
The imagery.
They're all just rats touching the pedal to get their food.
Their daily allotment of food pellets.
That's the ideal world for the globalist.
It's hell on earth for us.
We'd rather see the human spirit flourish.
We'll be back on the other side with Matt Baker.
A flourishing man himself.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
I'm about to welcome my guest Matt Baker.
Before I do, I want to remind you once again to stock up now on Survival Shield X2 from InfoWarsStore.com.
Go to InfoWarsStore.com.
Get Survival Shield X2. That's the nascent iodine supplement.
One of our most iconic supplements that we've ever had at InfoWarsStore.
One of the ones people will call in regularly and tell us how it changed their life.
I've had a friend of mine...
This is not medical advice.
I'm not making any claims here.
I'm no doctor.
But I've had a friend of mine who started taking S2 and started telling me, yeah, I'm sleeping an hour less a night, and I feel great.
I feel amazing.
You probably don't know what part of your life is being negatively affected by a lack of iodine.
It's not until you actually start supplementing iodine.
That you realize, oh, this is how I'm supposed, oh, this is how life is supposed to be.
This is what it's like with the decalcified pineal gland.
Survivor Shield X2, Nathan Iodine on sale right now at 50% off.
Stock up while you can at Infowarsstore.com.
That's Infowarsstore.com.
I also want to let everybody know I will be hosting Christy Lee's show, Get Free, later tonight.
So tune in for that if you're interested in seeing it.
Without any further ado, I am very happy to welcome back Matt Baker to the show.
He's well known for his activism.
He advocates liberty and effective common sense solutions to government problems.
You can keep up with Matt on his band.video channel, Slave2Liberty, or on his Instagram at MattBaker underscore unhinged.
He's on X at Slave underscore to underscore Liberty.
And on band.video, his channel Slave2Liberty is where you can find the 17-minute documentary.
He made about the L.A. fires called L.A. wildfires.
Thanks so much for joining us, Matt.
I'm glad to see you safe and unsinged, sir.
matt baker
Yes, unsinged indeed.
Happy New Year, everyone, in the info war.
Yeah, it was pretty crazy up there.
I could have made an hour documentary out of that, but in the sense of brevity on X, I know most people don't have an attention span.
We were pretty brutal cutting the scenes up as short and keeping it moving as possible to tell the story of the two-day adventure that me and Luke had up there in the aftermath and during the insanity.
harrison smith
Yeah, I mean, it's like half of it, you're like choking and coughing because the smoke is constantly in the air.
I mean, you were really putting yourself in a dangerous situation, and I encourage everybody to go watch the documentary.
We played a few minutes of it yesterday, but we didn't play the...
The full thing.
Wildfires.
LA 2025 wildfires documentary on xandband.video.
Just give us the summation.
If you could sum up your feelings about the event.
Maybe something that didn't come through the video.
Just as you finished your trip and got back home and you thought back, what was the feeling that you had about what was going on?
Just total catastrophe?
Just bumbling?
What was the sense you got about You know, what city was going through during these fires?
matt baker
Well, there's multiple things that happened on that level.
And some of them came through when I was editing the video, actually, that I didn't actually catch while I was there.
Because we were so, I mean, when we first showed up, you know, basically our goal was like, let's get to some flames and let's get some video footage.
You know, that was like the initial goal.
And then as we got there and started like, I don't know, almost like embedding in the situation, you start almost like becoming part of the response.
harrison smith
Right.
matt baker
You know, for example, there was that fire there in the initial one and I had talked to several of the firefighters and I was like, hey, are you guys going to put that fire up?
Because there was fire trucks just going left and right all over the place.
And they had like, I don't know, like maybe not a hundred fire trucks, but...
A hundred vehicles, water trucks, and fire trucks, and cop cars, and all set up a quarter mile away from where that particular fire was.
And there was houses on top of that hill right there south of Malibu.
And that was the Pacific Palisades, the south end of that.
And I just kept saying, why aren't you guys putting that out?
They're like, oh, it's probably going to create a fire break and this and that.
And then a little while later, after I, you know, start talking to all these people, next thing you know, a fire truck shows up and they start trying to put it out.
And then, you know, this didn't even make it to the edit.
And by the time I was, it was like three in the morning when I was done editing.
So it's like, I kind of wished I had went back and got that.
But that truck actually ran out of water.
You know, it was only spraying water on that particular fire for, I don't know, three or four minutes and it ran out of water.
I wasn't even quite aware of everything that people were saying online because we were in it.
You know, we were like totally in the fog of war.
And so then later on, I go back and I'm like, oh, my God, that they were saying they didn't have water.
And then I realized they had the water trucks there because they didn't have actually any city water.
You know, they didn't have it from the reservoir.
You go later on and find out that, you know, that reservoir, Sainte-Nez reservoir is completely dry, bone dry.
And they knew that that was where the water was going to come from.
And they knew.
That this area was in the path of where the fire was.
I mean, we deal with the Santa Ana winds and the fire departments know where the canyons are and which canyons are in the direct path, depending on which way the wind goes.
You can tell, like, it's like a barrel of a gun.
Once these canyons get lit up on fire, if it's in the direction of the fire, I mean, it just rushes through there and it builds such an intensity.
And when you have houses up on the ridges of these areas, they're going to get burnt.
So like Alex was saying, it's like they used to cut fire breaks, you know?
And now because of the lesser spotted rat tard that they're trying to save, they're constantly out there saying, well, oh, this little insect lives in a log and this little rat lives in these little burrows inside these little rotten trees.
And they're pretending, I believe they're pretending, they claim that they're trying to save these animals.
But as you can see, what happens here and in San Diego, whenever these areas go up, I mean, it is like an apocalypse.
It's like, I mean, I lived right by one of these fires in San Diego, and everywhere around, it was literally a moonscape.
There was no color anywhere.
It was absolutely black, everything.
No color plants, no color plastic, no color cars, no color houses.
It was just black everywhere.
Total destruction of all of this wildlife they're trying to save.
harrison smith
Yeah.
matt baker
You know, and all they would have to do is, like Trump says, rake the forest.
If you go to L.A., back in the day, you used to be able to have, like, a firewood business, and you could get a permit to go in and cut down dead trees and chop them up and put them in your truck and take them home and sell them, you know?
harrison smith
The government wouldn't even have to do anything.
matt baker
Yeah, people were actually doing this for free, and a lot of people...
There's a thing called manzanita wood.
It's really pretty wood and a lot of people used to cut that and use it for like lizard tanks and different things.
It's a very picturesque wood and they've made it illegal and like a felony to cut that wood down and that stuff grows like crazy in these valleys and they just won't allow it to be taken down and they won't allow the breaks.
Kind of getting sideways there.
What I hate to say, I really do hate to say, because I don't really blame the firefighters, because it's kind of like a military organization where it's top down, you know?
And so I saw a lack of leadership heavily.
When I look back on the videos, there are a million vehicles there, and I don't see almost nobody actually doing anything, to the point to where now I'm starting to wonder, like...
You know, Gavin Newsom, he's like, well, we're going to get reimbursed by the federal government for all of the efforts we've done.
They're just like, go out and have as many vehicles in state, have as many people on the clock, we have all that, and then they're just going to rake that back in from the federal government.
I mean, these guys right here, they were legit.
They were putting out, you know, their truck, you know, had a fuel filter that was, that had a hole in it.
Obviously, you don't want to be going through fires spurting out fuel.
When I was offering them, I'm like, hey, I brought a full set of socket wrenches and everything in the truck.
So I was like, hey, you guys want to help with that?
They're like, oh, no, we're going to wait.
But as a result, they're just kind of all just milling around.
It's almost like busy work.
Everyone had some little thing that they were focusing on, but it wasn't like you imagine a fire at this level.
It should be like, we need everybody over here.
I want people on this ridge.
I want you guys caught in a line.
I mean, I just didn't see it.
I did not see it anywhere.
And I didn't notice it because when I was there filming, I was, like, impressed, like, fire trucks and all this stuff.
And then when I look back, I'm, like, literally, like, what is anyone doing?
It was, like, a Truman show almost.
harrison smith
Right.
matt baker
To the people there.
And I'm, like, ask a firefighter what he's doing.
He's, like, oh, I don't really know.
There's a fire burning right there.
I'm, like, yeah, I don't see that.
You know, I'm, like, well, do you know what this area up here is called?
Like, no, I don't know what that's called.
Do you know where the fire is actually burning right now?
I was, like.
I think it's like over that hill somewhere.
There wasn't like, okay, we need to know the name of it.
Where is it going?
What's the plan?
There was zero plan.
It was crazy.
Anyway, I hate to hate on those guys, but I feel it was the leadership.
They're waiting for orders and not getting any.
harrison smith
Yeah, and it's tough to know what to do.
I mean, it just seems like the point you make about Being suspicious that maybe, you know, they're letting things happen a certain way because they know they're going to get reimbursed.
And sure, you know, it's like the classic thing where like, oh, you're under budget, so we better spend some money now or else they're going to cut our budget next year.
It's like they're just trying to...
And it seems like that's what we're seeing on display with all these fires is...
A disturbing proportion of people see a disaster and think, now's my chance.
What can I get out of this?
Whether that's the looters on the ground actually breaking into homes and stealing stuff, or the people in power going, oh, I better start up a real estate company.
I'm going to be able to get this stuff up for pennies on the dollar.
We're going to be able to make this an L.A. smart city.
This is really an opportunity for us.
We shouldn't see this as a catastrophe.
So it seems like everybody that's getting attention right now...
Is just looking to maximize profit out of these fires.
And maybe it's not the worst thing in the world that it burned down because now we get to reinvigorate the economy by building a bunch of new houses.
matt baker
Are people- If you look at Gavin Newsom, man, that guy, I can't believe people vote for him.
I can't believe it.
I mean, you look at that guy.
I mean, he looks like a devil.
unidentified
I mean, he's possessed.
matt baker
And he's talking about- You can't even read the room to the point where it's like, okay.
I'm kind of excited about this thing I've got to do, but I'm on TV, so I'm going to be like, we're really upset about the things, but you know what?
We're going to try to make the best of it.
He's like, it's an opportunity.
Oh, it's going to be great.
He's like, I've never even seen anybody dancing around and just so happy about this thing.
And then, oh, we don't know.
We don't know what we're planning on doing.
When meanwhile, they have the Smart LA 2028 project where they want to turn LA into a smart city, LA 2.0.
Like, you know any idea how big LA is?
Like, as huge as these fires are, no offense, it's a small cut in the mass of LA. I was kind of laughing because there was like three major fires going on.
You've got Altadena, and you've got the one over by Malibu and the Palisades, and then you've got the, I forget what the name of the other one was.
Eaton, yeah.
And they're like, they're all going to connect together.
I'm like, no, they're not, dude.
I mean, we were driving like...
Almost an hour between each one.
Look at this guy!
What is that?
That's insane!
He is a freak.
If anything good comes to this, I hope that the people in Hollywood, not necessarily Hollywood proper, but the Hollywood stars that own properties in that area, will finally wake up and finally start listening to some of the conspiracy theorists.
And actually start figuring out, like, hey, man, we need to get these guys out of here.
Like, these people are dangerous.
harrison smith
Is that happening?
Well, that's my question.
Is that revelation occurring in California?
I see people on X saying, oh, this is really going to wake the Democrats up.
I mean, they've got this pre-ordained, pre-established excuse of climate change.
I mean, are people waking up from this, do you think?
Or are people just going, oh, climate change and Trump.
What are you hearing?
They're in California.
matt baker
I believe people are waking up.
And obviously you've got people who are just full on, you know, brainwashed to the hilt and you're never going to get them out of it.
But I mean, you lose your, you know, $70 million mansion and you're like, well, it's climate change.
And then you start scrolling like, oh, the reservoir was out.
Oh, we didn't have any water.
Oh, we weren't allowed to fly breaks.
You might put it out of your mind for a little bit, but then when you go back to your $70 million mansion burnt to the ground, you're going to want somebody to blame, probably.
I just don't know that this, I think it's going to break through.
I think it's going to wake a lot of people up.
Now, whether it's going to change the politics, because I personally believe that California, which I was really happy when Tucker Carlson came out and said, oh, I mean, there's no elections in California.
The way he said it, matter of fact, it was so classic.
I've been believing this forever.
They invented the election fraud here.
They basically tried to broadcast it through the 2020 election, and then they got caught later, and it kind of got mitigated.
But they've had this system in place here forever, in my opinion.
I think that a lot, like Adam Schiff, you think people keep voting for Adam Schiff?
harrison smith
Right.
unidentified
What?
matt baker
I just don't believe it.
The people that are getting put in are like, they're always on board with these smart city agendas.
Like, down in San Diego, we go to these board meetings, and they're constantly now, they're like, oh, the housing crisis.
You know, we can't have anybody building out in East County.
It's too dangerous out there.
But they won't even, like, say, why don't we build, not a smart community, but let's say a safe community, where there will be, like, a 20-foot barrier around the area, where every house will have...
Terracotta tile roofs instead of, you know, tar shingles, right?
That's the number one thing you could do.
Like, if everyone had terracotta roofs, that would make a big difference.
Now, when your entire neighborhood's going up and you're in the center of that inferno, sparks are going to get up in your attic no matter what you do.
But there's so much they can do to mitigate this stuff ahead of time, and they didn't even try.
The idea that nobody was out at that reservoir, like, you think a giant reservoir like that, like, nobody's out there, like, no one mentioned it.
It never came up.
And this lesbian fire chief, she's all, she's like, oh, I was telling them, I was telling them they need to do something about it.
Well, listen, lady, or ma'am, or sir, whatever you call yourself, like, you have a cell phone too, right?
You see what we do?
Go out.
To the reservoir with a camera and be like, I am the fire chief.
We have a fire coming in.
This thing needs to be full.
Put some freaking pressure on these people.
You have the ability to do that thing.
You were there.
You knew there was a problem and you didn't do anything about it.
Now it's after the fact.
You're going to blame a bunch of people.
But when they come to doing the aftermath, like I said, they're going to say, how many fire trucks did we have on the scene?
unidentified
We had 77 million fire trucks and that still wasn't enough.
matt baker
So now they need...
Another 77 million fire trucks.
It all comes down to corruption in my mind.
I feel like every single part of this is corruption because they want more money for trucks or more money for this or more money for that, but they're not actually trying to solve the problem.
They're not trying to get a fire chief who's the king master, 98-year-old guy who's been fighting fires in canyons for the last million years, which are out there.
These people are there.
They know.
There was a guy on San Diego TV this morning saying, They have this water-based fire retardant that you can just spray around your house and it literally will not burn.
They could have created, even if they didn't want to cut the vegetation down, they could have dropped fire retardant in ribs down that canyon and it would have slowed it down crazy.
They're always after the fact and they're never proactive.
I have an idea.
I'm sorry, I'm just going off here.
harrison smith
No, I love it.
Go ahead.
matt baker
Honestly, what I have been saying for a long time is that...
Is that when these fires are going on, there should be those fire retardant or super scooper planes in the air.
And there should be drones flying around with infrared cameras.
And the minute they see any hotspot, they go directly to it.
Because once these fires get into like 50, 20, 30, 100 million acres, it's like, then you're done.
You have to get it right where it starts.
Boom.
This thing needs to be flying in the sky at high altitude.
Able to coast down to just like dive bomb you know like an eagle would just like see the spot boom coordinate And tell everybody, look, if you're out in the canyons and you light a fire, you might get firebombed, bro, because we can't have it.
Sorry if you get a giant water tank or fire retardant on you.
harrison smith
Well, look, no matter what the solution is, the fact is there are an infinite number of things that you could do to try to protect.
And this is what I keep saying.
With certain things like hurricanes, you get a little bit of a better warning than with a fire.
But something like a tornado, like, you kind of just have to endure those, right?
You just, you go underground, you just wait for it to pass over, or with a hurricane, you try to get out of its path, or you put sandbags around your house, and that's about all you can do.
And then you just wait to, but fires, just like, you know, your house.
You have fire.
You have smoke detectors.
You have fire extinguishers, hopefully.
You have at least a plan with your family.
Okay, if there's a fire, here's how you escape.
If you have the second floor, you have the ladder down.
There are things you can do to prepare for fire.
There are things you can do to prevent fire, and there are things you can do to stop fires immediately once they start.
I was thinking that same thing about drones.
I mean, drone technology is so cheap now.
They talk about, you know, reservoirs being built for $7.5 billion, right?
You guys, California, in 2014, set aside $7.5 billion.
unidentified
What do you mean, you guys?
harrison smith
You, the Californians out there, our beloved Californian brothers.
But I mean, even just take, hell, the claim is that Newsom took out $100 million from the budget.
I think if you gave, you and I, if the California government gave Matt Baker and Harrison Smith, I'll be generous.
$10 million?
I think we could come up with a system to never have a wildfire again.
Like, it really doesn't seem that difficult.
You have a drone that's just on automatic patrol over any fire-sensitive area.
You'd need, like, five drones running 24-7 with an infrared thing.
The moment it spots fire, it puts up an alert.
A human goes and checks, oh, that's a campfire.
No worries.
Moves on.
matt baker
I would dive bomb in those canyons.
If it was in a super mega red area, I would just tell people, like, You better not be in the canyons because if any fire starts off, if you even have a camp stub, we're bombing your area.
And that's all there is to it.
harrison smith
There's just a million ways to do it.
And again, $7.5 billion is an unimaginable amount of money.
I mean, you could do a space shuttle program for that.
You could have a space shuttle routinely going back up and down from the moon for $7.5 billion.
They build nothing.
Meanwhile, in places like Japan, they have these historic villages that are all made of wood and they're in fire-prone areas.
And if we can go to my computer screen, I'll play the video because this is what they've set up.
And I don't know why California, at least parts of it, couldn't have something like this.
They literally have it just in the ground, automatic fire hoses.
The jokes just soak the whole city.
Again, it's Japan.
It's a different situation.
This is a historic area.
You couldn't do this over a wide swath.
But the point is that there's technology out there that could...
Make a massive difference, but nothing is being deployed because I think you're exactly right.
The people in charge don't actually see their position as like having obligations to fulfill.
They see it as just like an excuse.
Now you have power.
Now you can start hiring all the other lesbians.
And that's what the point of being in charge is.
It's like, no, you're supposed to be trying to do the best job in your position.
And this is across the government and maybe on display best in L.A. right now with the fire.
They just genuinely are not trying.
Like, how can they be?
If they're genuinely trying and this is their best attempt, then that's maybe even a bigger issue.
But we can assume it's corruption.
Because, again, whether it's stuff like this that we're seeing on screen or using drone technology to identify fires and snuff them out, there's got to be more stuff they're doing.
And yet they're all just playing the blame game and acting like there's nothing that they personally could do.
It's sort of disgusting.
matt baker
We just need more money.
That's the answer to everything.
You know what I mean?
And it's like, the idea that this family, or woman and lady, Stuart and Linda Resnick, owns 57% of the water in Los Angeles.
Why would you ever let a private company own all that water?
These are the same people that basically suck Fiji dry.
Or the Fiji water.
All the locals there can't get water because they've sucked the aquifer down to the bone.
And all the locals are like, hey, we can't get any water.
unidentified
They're like, well, we own the water rights to the island there, pal.
harrison smith
I don't know if you remember, the CEO of Nestle a few years ago made a bunch of headlines by saying water is not a human right.
It should be privatized like everything else.
This is a globalist plan long in the works.
They understand you need to have the oils and minerals, but...
Really, most importantly, the food and the water is what people need to survive.
matt baker
Yeah, we're running out of time, I guess.
I was hoping to show the good story of the peacock, we say.
harrison smith
Oh, let's play that.
Do we have that video?
matt baker
Yeah, if we have the little tiny bit of that, that would be cool.
harrison smith
Matt Baker out there fighting fires and saving decorative birds.
You'll love to see it.
That's a beautiful peacock, my goodness.
matt baker
Yeah, his tail feathers are all burnt there, and his eyes were, like, singed shut.
But that bird ended up getting, he's on the news on LA. They're like, they even saved a peacock!
But they didn't mention me, obviously.
But I actually have the video of Peter the Peacock.
Not only that, we were actually putting out mini fires.
Because what I was going to say earlier is the difference between a hurricane and a fire is a hurricane has a magnitude and that's it.
A fire is an exponential creature.
So you could have literally one match turn into $100 billion worth of damage.
That doesn't happen anywhere else.
And that is why the absolute need to get these fires when they are small, when they are the size of a campfire, and just be like, there is a zero tolerance on any fire in this area at all.
I don't care if it's a camp stove.
I don't care if it's just someone out there with something that's hot that has a heat signature.
Zero tolerance when it's during these winds.
Also, these were not the highest winds of all time.
There had been higher winds there.
It was very high winds, no doubt.
But the idea that it's unprecedented is not true.
California gets these Santa Ana winds.
The Native Americans actually called them, I believe it's the devil winds or the hell winds or something like that because they knew what happened with them even back then.
So that was before global warming.
I just want to tell everybody, you know, you can do something.
Me and my buddy went out there putting out little fires for that very reason.
Because they come to an area and they say, it's actually a little bit before this on the clip, but they say that this area is out.
But we go down the road and we see these little fires and we were going to go get footage.
And I'm like, wait, there's fire there.
We should put it out.
So like we literally spent hours putting out these little fires.
harrison smith
Matt Baker, Slave to Liberty on X, Slave to Liberty on Bandai Video.
Thank you for joining us, sir.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Infowars.com forward slash go.
chase geiser
Ladies and gentlemen, Ultimate Sambucus is available right now at the alexjonesstore.com.
Now, Sambucus is a fancy word for elderberry.
This elderberry concoction is mixed with vitamin C and zinc.
It's gummies.
They're absolutely delicious.
I take two of them every single day as prescribed by the directions on the bottle.
Helps with things like healthy stress levels, antioxidant immune support.
It promotes respiratory health, seasonal support, and it's GMO and gluten-free.
Now, not only with Ultimate Sambucus gummies are you getting a delicious way to fight for your immune system, but you're keeping...
InfoWars on the air.
We know that Alex Jones is under relentless attack.
We know that InfoWars and this crew are under relentless attack as well.
And it's not just us they're coming after.
Frankly, it's you.
They want to silence you.
They want to kill your health.
They want to kill your mind.
And they want to subjugate you under a New World Order government.
So as far as I'm concerned, by going to thealexjonesstore.com and getting Ultimate Sambucas Gummies, you are not only fighting for your health, but you're fighting against the New World Order in the most effective way possible.
Export Selection