Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Jan. 7, 2025 - American Journal - Harrison Smith

02:38:22

The American Journal: BBC Reporter Warns UK PM Starmer May Cut Security Ties With US Unless Trump Distances Himself From Musk - FULL SHOW - 01/07/2025

Source

Participants

Main voices

harrison smith

02:02:20

Appearances

alex jones

01:58

robby starbuck

04:17

yuri bezmenov

03:29

Callers

andrew in new jersey

01:50

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Our conversation is with Mr. Yuri Alexandrovich Besmianov.
		He was the son of a high-ranking Soviet Army officer.
		He had an outstanding career with the press agency of the Soviet Union.
		It turns out that this is also a front for the KGB. He escaped to the West in 1970 after becoming totally disgusted with the Soviet system, and he did this at great risk to his life.
		He certainly is one of the world's outstanding experts on the subject of Soviet propaganda and disinformation and active measures.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		When the Soviets use the phrase ideological subversion, what do they mean? - Ideological subversion or active measures, in the language of the KGB, or psychological warfare.
		What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.
		It's a great brainwashing process and it's divided in four basic stages.
		The first one being demoralization.
		A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information.
		The facts tell nothing to him.
unidentified		Do you believe then that men can become pregnant and have abortions?
		Yes.
		What has this world come to?
		It's come to a world where drug kids actually exist.
		Then people do ketamine on a couch.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		The next stage is destabilization.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		Economy.
unidentified		There are some dire predictions on where the world economy is going.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		Foreign relations.
unidentified		Some of the world's superpowers could be on a collision course.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		Defense systems.
unidentified		The US Army is cutting back its expectations due to, quote, unprecedented recruitment challenges.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		The next stage, of course, is crisis.
unidentified		Folks!
unidentified		We're in a crisis.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		After crisis, you have so-called the period of normalization.
unidentified		When we say getting back to normal, we mean something very different from what we're going through right now.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		The demoralization process is basically completed already.
		I could never believe it when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.
		This is exactly what the KGB and Marxist-Leninist propaganda wants from Americans.
		To distract their opinion and attention from real issues of the United States.
		To have a bunch of duped Americans, then Americans who are healthy, physically fit, and alert to the reality.
unidentified		What is your ideal political or social structure?
unidentified		Communist utopia.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		That's why my KGB instructors specifically made the point.
		Try to get into...
		Filthy rich movie makers, intellectuals, cynical egocentric people who can look into your eyes with angelic expression and tell you a lie.
		These are the people who AGB wanted very much to recruit.
		All these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defenders, they are instrumental in the process of subversion only to destabilize a nation.
		When their job is completed, they think that they will come to power.
		That will never happen, of course.
		The psychological shock when they will see in future what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice, obviously they will join the links of dissenters.
		Marxist-Leninist regime does not tolerate these people.
		In future, these people will be simply squashed like cockroaches.
		Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful noble ideas of equality.
		The United States is in the state of war.
		The initiator of this war is the world communist system.
unidentified		This is it.
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		This is the last country of freedom and possibility.
unidentified		Okay, so what do we do?
unidentified		What is your recommendation to the American people?
yuri bezmenov ▲ ● ▼		The immediate thing that comes to my mind is, of course, there must be a very strong National effort to educate people in the spirit of real patriotism, number one.
		Number two, to explain them the real danger of socialist, communist, whatever, welfare state, big brother government.
		If people will fail to grasp the impending danger, nothing ever can help the United States.
		You may kiss goodbye to your freedom, including your precious lives.
		I know Americans don't like to listen to things which are unpleasant.
		I tried to get the message across to my horror.
		Nobody wanted even to listen.
		At least of all to believe what I had to say.
		The time bomb is ticking with every second.
		The disaster is coming closer and closer.
		Unlike myself, you will have nowhere to defect to.
unidentified		United States, wake up.
		It's Tuesday, January 7th in the year of our Lord 2025. And...
		You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
		Watch it live right now at band.video.
		Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Welcome to The American Journal.
		I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this morning from Austin, Texas.
		We got a lot of stuff to talk about today.
		We got no guests.
		We're gonna take a lot of phone calls.
		I'm still dropping videos in the folder.
		We're gonna have a lot of those to go to as well today as we attempt, try as we might to unravel the global conspiracy that is slowly but surely making everything terrible.
		So we got a lot to get into.
		We got a lot to discuss here.
		So this is my daily dispatch.
		All right, let's get right into it, shall we?
		Shall we?
		Here it is, your daily dispatch.
		All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch.
		For Tuesday, the 7th of January, 2024, children exposed to higher fluoride levels may have lower IQ.
		Government study finds...
		Well, what do you know, folks?
		A rigorous nine-year research review looking at the relationship between fluoride and intelligence.
		In children concludes that as fluoride levels rise, IQ drops.
		Every one part per million increase in fluoride in urine, a way of measuring all the sources of fluoride a person consumes, is associated with roughly a one-point drop in a child's IQ score.
		The review concluded.
		While an impact like that may seem small for any one person, on a wider scale, the study authors note, That's right, folks.
		To put it simply, putting fluoride in the water made everyone retarded.
		At least their teeth look nice.
		And again, this is something we've known forever.
		And this is the most tragic part of all this.
		It's not going to change most people's opinion on fluoride in water.
		They still are going to be in favor of it.
		Despite the fact that, on average, the amount of fluoride that we consume would lower your points, your IQ, about 10 points.
		That's one standard deviation.
		And can you imagine what the world would look like if everyone was 10 IQ points higher?
		Or if I could make the deal with you and say you are, whatever, 25% less likely to get a cavity, but I'm going to remove 10 points from your IQ, who would make that deal?
		Who out of any of you would be okay with the permanent mind fog, the permanent inability to...
		Make connections like you know you used to be that you would have understood something, but now you just can't quite wrap your mind around it because you're 10 points lower IQ, but at least your teeth are a little bit healthier, theoretically, I guess.
		I mean, you can just brush your teeth and not consume the fluoride, but that's too hard.
		So just put another million dollars in the Alex Jones was right jar.
		Since we've known this forever, from the very beginning, because that was the whole purpose of putting fluoride in the water in the first place.
		It was a psychological imperative to make everybody more easy to control.
		Meanwhile, the first H5 bird flu death has been reported in the United States.
		The CDC saddened by Louisiana's report that a person previously hospitalized with severe avian influenza illness.
		While tragic, a death from H5N1 bird flu in the United States is not unexpected because of the known potential for infection.
		These viruses can cause severe illness and death.
		There have been 66 confirmed human cases of H5N1 bird flu in the United States since 2024 and 67 since 2022. This is the first person in the United States who has died as a result of H5 infection.
		Outside the United States, more than 950 cases of H5N1 bird flu have been reported to the World Health Organization.
		About half of those resulted in death.
		So yeah, they're going to kick it off again, folks, and all of the signs are there.
		Meanwhile, AG Garland has been asked not to release Jack Smith's...
		Special counsel report on Trump.
		Donald Trump's lawyers have read special counsel Jack Smith's draft report detailing the findings of his two investigations of the incoming president and are urging Attorney General Merrick Garland to fire Smith and block the report's public release.
		Justice Department regulations say special counsels may submit reports explaining their legal decisions at the conclusion of an investigation.
		Garland has indicated he would make public any special counsel report with the necessary redactions that reaches his desk.
		But Trump's lawyers say releasing the two-volume report days before their client is again sworn in as president would disrupt his transition.
		According to a letter to Garland, included in a motion filed in Florida federal court Monday evening, says, quote, Releasing Smith's report is obviously not in the public interest, particularly in light of President Trump's commanding victory in the election and the sensitive nature of the ongoing transition process.
		Trump's lawyers have made a similar argument in their currently unsuccessful attempt to cancel the president-elect's sentencing this Friday in a separate New York state criminal conviction for falsifying documents related to hush money payment made before the 2016 election.
		A couple issues with this.
		First of all, yes, it would be extremely disruptive, but that's not a point against releasing it, as it's pretty clear the Biden administration is very deliberately doing everything in its power to disrupt the...
		Peaceful transfer of power to Donald Trump, including starting World War III on the eve of his inauguration.
		In addition to that, Jack Smith is not a special counsel because he has never been approved by the Senate to that position, which is constitutionally obligated to fulfill.
		So he's not a special counsel.
		He's just some guy that Merrick Garland tasked with going after Trump.
		So there's no legal basis for treating him like a special counsel.
		Since he's not one.
		Also, this is not the conclusion of an investigation because Jack Smith has given up and not concluded his investigation and doesn't have the legitimacy to carry one out in the first place, but certainly wouldn't release an investigation that was halfway completed.
		But again, none of these things are actually barriers to the Biden administration who routinely does illegal things on the Basis of disrupting the Trump incoming presidency.
	So we can expect to see just some absolute slanderous, libelous trash coming out from the special counsel's office any minute now because this is what they do.
	This is their strategy.
	If you remember just a few months ago, the Merrick Garland DOJ released a report that right-wing podcasters Were targeted by the Russian government and funded to some degree by people associated with RT, the Russian television station.
	Even though these people were not convicted or even accused of any crime, they did release it deliberately to smear these people's reputation and give plenty of deceptive fodder to the left wing in order to, again, discredit their political opponents.
	This is just the type of thing they do.
	There is no basis for it in the legal process.
	It is pure and simple abuse of power, and that's what they're really good at.
	So we can expect that to happen regardless of the constitutional obligations not to release it.
	Then we have this.
	Trump Jr. arrives in Greenland after dad says U.S. should own the territory.
	Donald Trump Jr. has arrived in Greenland.
	Just two weeks after his father repeated his desire for the U.S. to take control of the autonomous Danish territory.
	Before his arrival in the capital Nuuk?
	Capital of Greenland called Nuuk?
	That's pretty American.
	That's pretty badass.
	N-U-U-K. I'm sure there's a weird way to pronounce that, but I'm going to pronounce it Nuuk.
	The U.S. President-elect's son said he was going to, as a tourist, on a very long personal day trip to talk to people and had no meetings planned with government officials.
	Ahead of his son's trip, Donald Trump revived a controversy he ignited last month when he said ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity for U.S. national security.
	I'm in favor of that.
	Personally, I'm in favor of it.
	Just in a general desire for...
	I see a lot of people online saying, right-wingers used to be concerned at the North American Union, and now they're cheering it along because it's Trump doing it.
	Let me explain why you're wrong about that.
	The North American Union is just one part of the globalist, global government, one-world, unelected technocracy.
	In which every basically continent on Earth will be separated into its own governorship and managed by the pyramid structure of the global government, meaning that Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. would be stripped of their sovereignty and placed under control of unelected bureaucrats probably headquartered in Israel.
	That's the North American Union.
	When America brings states in, that's just what it's done for its entire existence.
	I don't know if I need to tell you this, but it wasn't like on the eve of, you know, it wasn't on July 3rd, 1776, that this big land mass just existed.
	And July 4th, you got all 50 states delineated exactly as they stand today.
	America was conquered piecemeal, part by part.
	Including up till the 1950s when Alaska and Hawaii moved from being territories or protectorates into actual full-fledged statehood.
	So this isn't anything new or unexpected or totally different.
	It's just been about 70 years since the last time this took place.
	A lot of people listening to my voice right now were alive when there were 48 or 49 states.
	Now there are 50. That does not mean that we're moving towards a North American union.
	It means that America is gaining more land, which is good and fine and should happen more, I think.
	And finally, we have this.
	Meta is ending its fact-checking program in favor of a community note system similar to X. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced a series of major changes to the company's moderation policies and practices Tuesday, citing a shifting political and social landscape and a desire to embrace free speech.
	Zuckerberg said the Meta will end its fact-checking program with trusted partners and replace it with a community-driven system similar to X's community notes.
	The company is also making changes to its content moderation policies around political topics and undoing changes that reduce the amount of political content in user feeds, Zuckerberg said.
	The changes will affect Facebook and Instagram, two of the largest social media platforms in the world, each boasting billions of users, as well as threads.
	Yeah, also threads as an afterthought there.
	Yes, it will affect Instagram and Facebook, two of the now outdated but still dominant social media platforms, and also whatever threads is.
	Also, whatever threads is supposed to be, that'll also be affected, I guess, but nobody's ever been to the website, so we're not sure whether that matters.
	There's a lot of things to read into in this, but again, it is a reminder that people in charge are not...
	All-powerful, all-knowing, able to do whatever they want whenever they want.
	This is, of course, a part of Mark Zuckerberg's wider attempt at rebranding himself as not a sniveling bug person working at the behest of the most evil scumbag bankers in the entire world.
	And it's not going to work, Mark.
	I'm sorry to tell you.
	Surf around with an American flag all you want.
	We know who you are.
	We've looked into your cold, robotic eyes.
	And we've encountered your soul, and we don't like what we see there.
	It's a decrepit pit of greed and hostility.
	So, no thanks.
	You can pretend to change your content moderation all you want.
	Your platforms are dying, and that's going to continue into the foreseeable future.
	So, good luck with that, sir.
	Apparently, Dana White has joined the board of Meta.
	Look, this is good news.
	What this means is that we have certainly gotten past the most extreme censorship that we'll be likely to experience in the near future.
	The height was probably around 2020, but certainly kicked off in 2016. Really ramped up as soon as Trump got into office.
	Of course, that was when they launched the term fake news.
	It was exactly one week after Trump was elected that the blood libel, the scam, the Sandy Hook lawsuit ball got rolling.
	Attempting to sue Infowars out of existence as a model.
	To then use on everybody else, which they have.
	V-Dare, Gateway, Pundit, Rumble.
	They're all experiencing massive legal abuse through the system.
	But apparently they've learned that that doesn't actually work because you can't actually keep a lid on this sort of stuff.
	The internet, as controlled as it is, still has outlets of freedom and people simply conform to whatever the laws or rules are.
	In a way that allows them to still put out their ideas.
	And I mean, this is just human nature, and it's obvious, and it's not anything that they can feasibly combat.
	And it's really just annoying.
	It really just means that everything becomes a little bit more annoying when you have things like you can't say killed, and so you have to say self-deleted or whatever they say.
	What do they say?
	They have all these terms.
	Unaliving, that's the one.
	Thank you, Dan.
	Yeah, he was unalived.
	And it's just like, something about that, it's like hearing the word moist to me.
	You know, it's just something that kind of makes you uncomfortable, kind of makes you cringe.
	He was unalived.
	It's like, just say kill.
	Just say he was dead, he died.
	But they censor those words, and so you just come up with a different word that means the same thing, and it's just less, like more unwieldy.
	And less accurate.
	But again, we, you know, obviously censorship is a very big topic right now.
	And we've been saying for a long time as we've been monitoring this, that it's fairly clear that the powers that be figured out that with the modern technological landscape, banning people outright just doesn't work.
	It was a lesson that InfoWars taught them.
	Like, do you think that if Alex Jones got kicked off of every platform in 2018?
	On that fateful day where Spotify and Apple and YouTube and Facebook and Twitter and every other platform kicked us off all at once.
	Which, first of all...
unidentified		Strange coincidence.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, first of all, what a crazy coincidence that was.
		But think about that.
		I mean, it's worth it to just remember what that was like.
		It wasn't that we just got kicked off of...
		A platform or two, and so we couldn't like share our links there.
		We got kicked off of everything, and we were dominating on everything.
		We lost in that one fell stroke, just from YouTube, something like $30,000, $40,000 a month in ad revenue.
		Just cut off completely.
unidentified		About 3 million subscribers.
		Alex was one of YouTube's original gems.
		He was one of the first content creators to get that plaque for a million subscribers.
		He was someone who was a content creator who drew so many people to YouTube.
		On top of that, we're talking about 3 million I think at the end, somewhere around 3 million.
		And I remember looking at our YouTube analytics one day in the afternoon, and the only way to describe how popular Alex was was a metric that they gave us about hours consumed.
		There were hundreds of millions of hours consumed of Alex Jones' show each month on YouTube.
		And that's when, after, you know, 2016, the system went into a freak-out panic mode, and they said, shut this guy down.
		He was just too electric.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And look, that was even with, like, algorithmic crushing, like, you know, the hammer coming down and just getting banned completely.
		That was a huge, major, unprecedented step.
		But even before then, we weren't given any breaks, right?
		We weren't pushed to the front page.
		We weren't...
		We weren't given the Young Turks treatment, let's just say that, right?
		The Young Turks.
unidentified		Oh, definitely not.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Definitely not.
		If you just signed on, like, no screen name, just, like, visiting YouTube for the first time, you'd be, like, force-fed one of those videos.
		I still am, like, flabbergasted that, like, if you buy a TV, it's likely it'll come, or, like, a Roku or something, it'll come preloaded with the Young Turks channel, right?
		And, of course, they still had to get massive injections of hundreds of millions of dollars.
		Like, the amount of success that we've had...
		Especially when put up against the institutional bonuses that our competitors get, and we were still beating them.
		But then just to get taken off that, get taken off, and not just Twitter and Facebook where people share our links, but Spotify and Apple where people listen to our shows on podcasts, you know, massively.
		And then where our app was taken off the Google and Apple app stores, I mean...
		First of all, it is a literal miracle that we survived that at all.
		And that, of course, is thanks to you supporting us.
		And because Alex Jones had an idea that this might happen, and so for years set up the Infowars store, and then we were able to create band.video in order to actually host our videos.
		We had to do all that ourselves.
		But do you think that right now Facebook would be getting rid of its content moderation and fact-checking?
		Do you think that this change would have happened where they went from outright banning people to just subtly influencing things and maybe just crushing your reach a little bit?
		Sure, you can still have an account, but you just can't be verified or make money with it.
		This change from overt and blatant censorship to a more soft-touch censorship I think might be solely because of the fact that Infowars survived.
		And everybody else, like I wouldn't have blamed you if back then the people who coordinated all of that, right?
		Because it was clearly coordinated.
		It clearly happened in an orchestrated fashion.
		I can see them going, look, we just take him off Facebook, he'll survive.
		We take him off YouTube, he'll survive.
		But if we take him off everything at once, he'll be gone in a month from now.
		I'm sure they thought that was the truth.
		And it was a reasonable thing to expect, taking us off all those things.
		How could we survive, right?
		And then they do it, and then we survive, and then we get bigger, and then come 2020, we're still on air with new shows and massive new studios.
		I think they looked at that and went, okay, this doesn't work.
		De-platforming people, especially people like Alex Jones, who are popular enough and his audience is loyal enough, and he has, of course, the backup foundational strength of terrestrial radio.
		I think they realized, okay, this doesn't work.
		We tried it.
		We hit him as hard as we possibly could.
		And yet, not only did he survive, we thrived.
		And they had to come up with a different strategy for how to silence people they don't want speaking.
		Part of that was by going after them through lawfare.
		Part of it was launching lawsuits and investigations against people unfairly.
		Benefiting and collaborating with.
		The mainstream media tried to discredit their opponents.
		But none of it's worked.
		We are succeeding.
		We are still getting our message out there.
		They are still having to change their tactics.
		And we got other stories here today.
		I'll show you the video on the other side.
		McDonald's ending their DEI practice.
		Like, the entire corporate world went insane for a couple years.
		And finally, we, on the dissident right, are dragging them back to sanity and having major success doing it.
		I'll show you what some of that looks like on the other side.
		Stay with us.
		It's the American Journal.
		And we're only here because you have helped us to survive the censorship by going to DrJonesNaturals.com and keeping us alive.
unidentified		All right, folks, welcome back.
unidentified		This is Infowars.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		American Journal.
		I'm just trying to find...
		The exact post.
		But I want to make a point here because it sort of goes across the board.
		Two things.
		First of all, the globalists, powers that be, scumbags, are having to change their tactics because they're just not working like they expected them to.
		They expected us to be off air as soon as they coordinated the attack against us.
		With all these companies, and Matt was making an interesting point during the break about the fact that these supposedly private companies all are clearly working in tandem, operating as a monopoly, essentially, or a trust, where they're all coordinating their actions very deliberately, not in the pursuit of greater profit, which is sort of what they're obliged to do by law, even though I don't necessarily agree with that anyway.
		It dates back to Dodge v.
		Ford, I think it was.
		The Supreme Court case that said that has to be the highest priority of a company is to get money for its shareholders.
		You know, they violate that and actually cost themselves a ton of money when they move to censor people like Infowars.
unidentified		You are correct on Dodge v.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Ford.
		Dodge v.
		Ford, there you go.
unidentified		They must maximize the interests of shareholders.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so she asked, you know, how do they get away with this?
		And, of course, they were doing it at the behest of the government.
		Also, we know that from the Facebook files and the Twitter files that have been released by Schellenberg and others.
		But you have to understand that all of this stems from the banks.
		And this is DEI as well.
		Exact same thing, right?
		A company is supposed to prioritize profits.
		And again, I don't think that's the healthiest way to run a business.
		But the idea is that it has a built-in sort of control mechanism in that the people can choose not to buy that thing, then the company has to change its behavior.
		And companies with good reputations will be rewarded by their customers by returning over and over.
		And it's very simple but effective.
		Way to just get the best out of whatever corporation or industry that you're operating.
		You prioritize profits.
		Profits are derived from people in the free market choosing to purchase your product.
		So you have to serve them.
		You have to do what they want.
		You have to treat them well.
		And it's just sort of a self-correcting, self-controlling sort of thing.
		All of that was undermined by the banks.
		And the big money managers like BlackRock and Vanguard deciding on a whim that ESG scores would be a thing, that DEI would be something to be rewarded by investors, by cash injections, meaning that you didn't have to prioritize profits.
		It actually made more sense to sacrifice profits, fulfill ESG obligations.
		You would actually make more money than just off the profits alone.
		For a job in that position, because that will translate to greater profits.
		Well, you know, let's say you put somebody in as a manager at McDonald's.
		He's a really good manager.
		He keeps the place spick and span.
		Your order's always right.
		You increase profits 15%.
		That store, instead of making half a million, makes $600,000.
		And you've gotten a little bit of a bump up.
		Now, what ESG scores does is says, all right, instead of...
		Getting the best person for the job, who might be a straight white guy, God forbid, and a Christian on top of that, right?
		Who would have taken the profit from $500,000 to $600,000.
		Instead, you put in an incompetent gay black woman.
		The profits from that store actually decrease from $500,000 to $400,000.
		But your ESG score goes up, which means that BlackRock invests...
		A million dollars.
		So instead, your profit has gone from $500,000 to $400,000 plus a million.
		Now you're up $1,400,000.
		That's a way better deal than just putting in the person who's right for the job and increasing the profit naturally as a consequence of their capability.
		So just an utter and complete perversion of the entire capitalistic system that people just accept it.
		I don't get how they got away with this.
		It is crazy.
		It's the type of thing where you bring this up to an investment banker and you expect them not to know what you're talking about.
		Because it's like, how could they?
		Here you are managing people's monies.
		You're dealing with hundreds of millions of dollars.
		You're going to be very careful.
		You're going to be very knowledgeable.
		And you're going to want to choose things that actually have a good return on investment.
		Meaning that the profit margins are large and sustainable.
		And then along comes BlackRock and Vanguard, and they go, yeah, actually, we're not even going to grade companies by their potential profitability.
		We're now grading them entirely on the metric of how many non-white people they have, how much money they give to pointless climate change agenda scams, and, you know, what their environmental, social, and governance.
		So, like, how many, again, literally just, like, gay black women they have on their...
		That's how we're going to measure companies from now on.
		Even though it is not just unrelated to profit, it often has a negative impact on the profitability of that company.
		So I don't know how they got away with this.
		And again, it is because I've asked investment banker, I go, you ever heard of ESG? And they're like, oh yeah, ESG scores.
		Yeah, yeah, we use those all the time.
		That's how we judge companies.
		And it's like, so do companies with higher ESGs, like are they more profitable?
		It's like, yeah, because we give them more money.
		This doesn't make any sense.
		No, all of this is ass backwards.
	I'm sorry to tell you.
	This is all completely outrageous and arbitrary and totally unsustainable.
	How did they get away with implementing this?
	Because they absolutely did.
	And again, there's a thread of continuity here.
	What I was trying to find, because sort of the first place that this came about was Patreon.
	Patreon, of course, wasn't just a social media platform where people just posted things and Just had fun and, you know, whatever.
	It was like a way to make money.
	It was a way that people sustained themselves.
	They earned a living by creating content that was supported through Patreon.
	And I just can't quite remember the details.
	Like, one of the first people kicked off Patreon, I want to say it was like Andrew Anglin, or maybe it was like Sargon of Akkad.
	Like, it was somebody who got kicked off of Patreon.
	It was like the first time this happened.
	When somebody got kicked off of not just social media, but like a money-making, you know, commodity exchange platform for off-site behavior.
	In other words, it was regular and understood that like, okay, if you post things that are against the terms of service on Facebook or YouTube, they're going to take down your account because you're not allowed to post that sort of stuff.
	But it had never happened where you would get kicked off of Facebook for what you posted on YouTube.
	That had never happened before.
	In this case, it was things that people had posted on X or some other social media that, was it Carl Benjamin?
	Okay, so it was Sargon of Akkad.
	And he was kicked off.
	And Patreon actually, you know, this was very early on.
	Maybe they didn't know how subtle they needed to be.
	They actually, like, apologized and were like, look, this wasn't us.
	This was Visa and MasterCard.
	Visa and MasterCard came to them and said, we'll cut you off completely.
	We'll shut your entire site down unless you kick off these specific people.
	So this came from the banks and the credit card processors from the outset.
	They were the first impetus to get this going from the very beginning, exactly the same way that it was the big money managers like BlackRock and Vanguard that instituted the DEI programs that have made everything worse and completely dislocated our capitalistic system from any underlying logic whatsoever.
	So all of this stems from...
	The banks.
	And it's one of those things that when you really get right down to it, it's like you can trace absolutely everything back to not just the banks as a whole, but the Federal Reserve, in particular Vanguard and BlackRock, State Street, some of these other larger money-managing companies, as the head of the snake.
	Patreon bars anti-feminists for racist speech inciting revolt.
	Yeah.
	I was trying to find the actual letter that they wrote.
	And it was PayPal as well.
	PayPal was very early on this.
	Because they realized, you just have to think like an evil person.
	You go, okay, do we try to fight these people on their own ground?
	Do we try to get these social media companies to have some sort of social obligation to our view of the world?
	Or do we just cut off their money?
	Money is just the most useful tool ever.
	You just cut off their money.
	You put yourself in the position that money has to go through you, whether as a credit card processor or something like PayPal, which is just a fancy credit card processor for the internet.
unidentified		You just de facto sanction private citizens.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Exactly.
		De facto sanction private citizens is a great way to put it.
		And of course, it's not really a coincidence, I don't think, that all of the original founders of PayPal went on to create Palantir.
		You know, it was Elon Musk and Peter Thiel.
		And all these guys, the PayPal mafia, they called it.
		That's very suspicious in and of itself.
		But this is how it goes.
		You realize that the money-processing corporations are the bottleneck that everybody has to go through.
		And if you can control that, then you can control everything.
		And you don't have to worry about confronting these distant voices piecemeal or getting every social media company on board.
		You just say, well, tell you what, I control the money.
		I control the flow of money.
		So I can cut you off if you don't do what I say.
		So do what I say.
		And then they do what you say.
		Or you cut their money off.
		It's very simple.
		Really not complicated.
		Same thing with DEI. They just can impose ESG scores arbitrarily.
		And people either go along with it or they get cut out of billions of dollars.
		Literally as simple as that.
		And that's why people like, you know, Ron Paul, who studied this stuff long before it ever, like, really got into operation or really came into fruition.
		And he simply identified, like, okay, if we want to stop all of this madness, it's the Federal Reserve.
		It's the fact that there is a private corporation that prints and distributes infinite amounts of money.
		That's what allows all of this to take place.
		That's what gives them the control or grants them the position.
		To impose their will on the people.
		It all goes back to that head of the snake.
		And so that's what has to be chopped off to kill the beast.
		And that really is what it all comes down to.
		And it's a very clever scheme because what you do is you put it in a capitalistic system that still ostensibly still claims to exist for the profit.
		You know, to gain profit and for the benefit of shareholders, even though it doesn't anymore, but you still claim that it does.
		And so then you have leftists and people who are in favor of massive corporations acting as de facto governments and monopolies and trusts to impose their view of the world on everybody else.
		And they're able to say, well, you know, Target just has transgender swimsuits for three-year-olds because that's what people want.
		They're just going after profit, and they're just trying to sell things that are profitable.
		So you can't blame Target for being super gay and trying to shove homosexuality down the throats of toddlers.
		They're just responding to the market.
		It's the market's fault.
		See, capitalism bad, and they're just responding for the sake of profit to their customers' desires.
		But that's not true, because the customers' desires, by design, come second to the demands of the bank.
		Who will force these companies to do unprofitable things by promising them cash injections to make up for, overcome, and actually supersede the shortfall they would receive from selling these things to people who don't want them.
		So it's all by design.
		It's all manipulated.
		It's all completely dishonest, out of whack, and destroying the foundation of capitalism, which is simply an outgrowth.
		Because it's what people do when you give them free choice, is they tend to spend their money where they want and shape the world around them that way, just de facto through their own actions.
		So it seems complicated, but it's really not.
		You just have the rulers of the world controlling banks and BlackRock and massive funds of invisible Magically summoned money.
		And you can impose all sorts of insane stuff on the American populace.
		Most of the time, you're going to be extremely successful with that.
		However, these programs have started to falter and are now being reversed because of the appropriate backlash they've been receiving for the last couple of years.
		Let's go to some of these videos.
		We'll go to this by Robbie Starbuck first.
		And he's been on an absolute tear.
		And it turns out it is effective.
		And this is what I like.
		I love Robbie Starbuck.
		In fact, we should try to get Robbie Starbuck on the show to talk about this because as much as we talk about and try to explain the mechanisms and psychology behind a lot of this globalist intervention, this is all supposed to just be in the service of action.
		We don't want to just talk about this stuff.
		And that's that.
		We talk about it and you know about it and then you just go about your day.
		We want to see action taken and we want to even take the successful strategies of our enemies and apply them to ourselves.
		So again, you can look at X and the way that Elon Musk has been forced to apply certain measures of censorship throughout his time at X because The ADL or the SPLC or APAC or whoever it is,
		whatever Jewish group is organizing this, gets together all of the advertisers on X and gets them all to agree we're going to remove advertising until they put in anti-Semitism controls.
		And so that's what happens.
	And so in this case, again, it's using the money and the flow of money in order to impose restrictions that do not benefit it.
	Capitalistically, unless you have this unified monopolistic block of advertisers withholding advertising money until demands are met.
	Again, they call it a boycott.
	It's not a boycott.
	A boycott is a capitalistic thing.
	It's when normal people choose to not buy from a company in protest of their actions, behavior.
	Or whatever.
	But it has to be sort of a ground up.
	It can be organized.
	It can be people getting together and go, we're all not going to do this.
	But it's not.
	That's a boycott.
	It's a ground level, bottom up kind of protest.
	In this case, this is corporations and the head of corporations withholding funding of their corporations.
	Which is, by the way, a negative to the corporations.
	I mean, it happened with Kanye West, obviously, extremely famously.
	Where Adidas, I think it was Adidas, right?
	Lost billions of dollars.
	By cutting him out of the deal.
	By screwing him over with the Yeezy line.
	That wasn't a benefit to their shareholders.
	It wasn't a benefit to their stockholders.
	Again, I don't understand how they get away with it.
	If I was an Adidas stockholder and I suddenly learned that I lost a ton of my money in their stock because they wanted a virtue signal about yay, I'd be suing them.
	I'd be suing them and going, you have a judicial responsibility to You know, maintain and achieve the best profit.
	Here you are making totally arbitrary decisions that eliminate billions of dollars in profit as a virtue signal about Kanye West because he brought up some 4chan memes on Infowars.
	I mean, that's absurd.
unidentified		They reportedly lost $540 million.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, $540 million.
		So they're not pursuing profit.
		This is not, you know, a...
		It's the opposite of that.
		But they're forced to do it by, you know, this coordination and collaboration by these other big companies who basically threaten to bankrupt them completely if they don't go along with censoring Elon or censoring Ye.
		It all goes back to the banks, the bankers, the big money managers.
		They have the power to do this and are happy to wield it.
		Robbie Starbuck has taken this strategy and flipped it on them, has been going to corporation after corporation, giving them a nice phone call and going, hey, you know, I'm working on this piece about the DEI practices that you follow, the way that you discriminate against white men, discriminate against Christians, and discriminate against the American people.
		Any comment?
		And they go, actually, we're reversing that.
		Actually, now that you mention it, we don't want to do that anymore.
		And he's done this with like John Deere, excuse me, and Toyota.
		And now he's done it with McDonald's.
		Let's go to clip number seven.
		Here's Robbie Starbuck on the latest trophy he can mount on his wall, stopping DEI practices.
		This time it's McDonald's Corporation.
		Let's watch.
robby starbuck ▲ ● ▼		All right, everybody, I got good news for you.
		We got another one.
		You know what time it is.
		We've got a new company flipping their position on DEI, and that company is McDonald's.
		Now, let me tell you how this happened and what the details are.
		I've just got to give X a shout out here because I actually reached out to McDonald's on X to their senior marketing director on Friday.
		You can see here.
		So Friday, I sent them a detailed message.
		I'm not going to share the whole thing here, but a detailed message about DEI. I mean, you can read this part, no problem.
		And that was Friday, so three days ago.
		And today, this statement came out.
		There's more to this.
		But for the sake of your time, we're going to jump ahead past a lot of the corporate word salad and go straight into what they're changing.
		So let me go and translate this corporate speak for you.
		First bullet point.
		We are retiring setting aspirational representation goals.
		And then it's a bunch of blah, blah, blah corporate speak.
		Let me translate what that means.
		McDonald's, like many Fortune 500 companies, they had what they would call targets or goals.
		In reality, they work like racial quotas.
		But they say these are certainly not quotas.
		Don't call them that.
		This is just a goal for them to hire, say, 50% people of color, whatever it might be, into a certain position.
		And then wouldn't you know it, they hire just the amount that they put, but it's not a quota.
		Don't call it a quota.
		Second bullet point, and always one of my favorites, we are pausing external surveys to focus on the work we are doing internally, a.k.a. we are leaving the HRC's Corporate Equality Index Social Credit Scoring System Keep in mind, this was a company that had a perfect HRC CEI score.
		And that HRC CEI scoring system is how woke policies get forced into workplaces.
		So they are, again, the latest company to leave that scoring system.
		And that is good news.
		And now bullet point number three, one of my favorites, they're going to be retiring their supply chains DEI pledge in favor of a system that relates to business performance.
		Imagine that, a merit-based system.
		This is what every company needs to be doing.
		The days of favoring one group of people over another based on diversity need to be gone.
		Bullet point number four here is one I'm not particularly a fan of and I'm not happy with when companies do this.
		They are evolving how they refer to their diversity team, which will now be the global inclusion.
		I think it's ridiculous.
		We don't need these teams, okay?
		It is a job.
		It is a workplace.
		You go there to work.
		People don't need a team assigned at corporate to making sure everybody feels included, okay?
		We're not kindergartners.
		We're adults.
		It's a workplace.
		It's a place people go to shop.
		Just provide great service.
		Be kind.
		Do the right thing.
		Be fair.
		And if you're a company executive, you know, lay down the hammer when somebody breaks the law.
		Everybody's all for that.
		But there's no need for DEI teams at all.
		No need for a diversity team.
		I don't care what you call it.
		People have had enough of this, and I think it's time that everybody speaks up and that we get rid of this infantile way of operating businesses.
		Focus on the bottom line, make money, do a great job.
		Everybody's happy then, and that is the direction corporate America is veering toward, is corporate neutrality.
		We are the trend now.
		Don't forget that.
		Because we have raised our voices, so many companies, over $2 trillion of companies have changed their policies, and we will not stop until we make corporate America sane again.
		So is this perfect?
		No.
		But you know what?
		McDonald's wasn't one of the worst to begin with, but they were on our list of companies, and there are many companies that we aim to change.
	And we got more done today changing policy than anybody else has.
	So I'm very proud.
	In fact, I have to say, I'm loving it.
	And you guys knew I was going to have to do that at least once, okay?
	I had to use that line at least one time, so do not judge me because it was too easy.
	I'm loving it, okay?
	I'm loving changing these crazy policies.
	And for those of you who are new to watching my videos, you might be wondering, what is corporate neutrality?
	And it's very simple.
	Companies need to stay out of divisive issues.
	Unless it's related directly to the regulation of their business, they should not be involved in politics.
	We don't want to know what Macy's thinks about trans rights, okay?
	And you know what?
unidentified		If they want to speak up and talk about it, we don't want to spend our money there.
robby starbuck ▲ ● ▼		We have a right as customers to know how the money is being spent later.
		And then we can decide if we want to give our money to that company.
		And in many cases now, we are waking up and saying, no, we don't want to give our money to this company that hates our values and everything we believe in.
		So that is why we're taking this stand.
		We want companies to get out of the divisive issues.
		And that means I don't want them taking on my politics either and advocating for my policy positions.
		I'm just saying neutral.
		Let's stay out of the way of politics and divisive issues and just act normal, sell great products, and everybody can exist without any more division.
		Okay.
		So if you're loving our pro- Damn it, I did it again.
		If you're loving our project to stop woke policies in corporate America, then subscribe on my X page.
		It's $5 a month.
		It helps support our research team, which goes into our stories and helps split policies at companies.
unidentified		So there you go.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Another just massive feather in the cap of Robbie Starbuck.
		Well done to him.
		And again, this is what it's all about.
		I'm happy to see that people aren't just taking this lying down or even just talking about it.
		Our job's to talk about it.
		It's time for the info warriors out there to pick up the baton and run with it and actually make these changes.
		Of course, you can support our mission by going to Dr. Jones' Naturals.
		I'll tell you more about that.
		On the other side, but there's TurboForce Plus and Vitamin Mineral Fusion, two of our most popular products ever, for very good reason, back in stock and on sale at drjonesnaturals.com.
		TurboForce Plus and Vitamin Mineral Fusion, the combo that will help you conquer the world.
		Go to drjonesnaturals.com.
		Join us on the other side of the second hour.
		Come back, folks.
		The second hour of American Journal is on.
		We'll get into the British stuff here in just a second.
		A lot of stuff going down in the UK. That's worth commenting on.
		And we'll start with clip number four here.
		Just to finish off what we were talking about before.
		The combined threat of DEI and censorship all being initiated and springing forth from the control that major banking institutions have.
		In our country.
		Let's go to clip number four here.
		This is Mark Zuckerberg attempting to continue his rebranding as an American free speech warrior.
		Let's watch.
unidentified		We're going to get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms.
unidentified		More specifically, we're going to get rid of fact checkers and replace them with community notes similar to X starting in the U.S. But why though?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Why would you do that?
		Why, though?
		I mean, don't you want things to be factual?
		Yeah, they're admitting defeat is what's happening.
		They are surrendering to the truth.
		Or at least they're trying to alter the way they control things.
		Instagram is still a very popular platform.
		Facebook is not, frankly.
		What do you think the likelihood is that he lets InfoWars have a Facebook page?
		What do you think the likelihood is that he lets InfoWars material get shared on his platform now?
		I give it a likelihood of 0-1%.
		I don't think it's happening.
		So, until something like that happens, until they allow on many of the people that were victims of their anti-free expression stance, which he is admitting there by saying, actually, we're going to get back to free expression.
		The obvious insinuation is that right now and for the past couple of years, that has not been their priority.
		Their priority has been controlled expression.
		It has been manipulated and designed and artificially influenced expression.
		And they're not going to change that.
		So until they give Infowars back our pages, especially if they could give them back with all the millions of followers that we used to have, This is just a lie.
		It's just pretend.
		It's just the man behind the curtain shifting to a different curtain.
		But we're going to move on now.
		We're going to get into the BBC and the UK and the mass rape scandal that has obliterated that country.
		Let's go to clip number three first.
		This is Jack Anderton.
		Asking, is Britain the most corrupt country in the modern world?
		Let's watch.
unidentified		Is Britain the most corrupt country in the modern world?
		Well, it certainly seems that way if you examine the record of South Yorkshire police.
		From the Rotherham grooming gangs, to the Hillsborough disaster, to the 1984 miners' strike, the police force, whose headquarters is behind me, have been involved in scandal after scandal, yet no one has been held accountable.
		No one is in jail for the failure to protect young white girls from grooming gangs in Rotherham.
		And no one is in jail for trying to cover it up.
		No one is in jail for the deaths of 97 Liverpool football fans at Hillsborough.
		And no one is in jail for lying about the cause of the disaster.
		And no one is in jail for the 1984 miners' strike, in which this police force fabricated evidence, assaulted miners, and carried out false arrests.
		South Yorkshire Police is rotten to its core, and yet no one has been held accountable.
		South Yorkshire Police exists to serve you, the people, but instead, it seems to be serving itself.
		So there must be consequences.
		Firstly...
		Abolish South Yorkshire Police.
		It cannot be reformed.
		Prosecute officials who have failed in their duty.
		They must be held criminally responsible.
		And finally, remove the pensions of officials involved in these scandals.
		It's time Britain becomes a serious country again, with serious consequences for those who are responsible for our failing system.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		That's Jack Anderton, a very measured response to the deliberate failures of the UK police over and over again for decades.
		We'll get back to it.
		Welcome back, folks.
		We've got a lot of news here.
		We've got a lot of news to get to.
		We're talking about the UK now, since that is a very hot topic.
		Sort of reignited.
		Thanks in no small part to Elon Musk.
		Popularizing some of these revelations about the grooming gangs, so-called.
		Of course, it's not grooming.
		It's pedophile rape gangs.
		And the stories are horrific.
		Perhaps the most horrific aspect to it is the fact that And I've avoided even getting into some of these details just because they are so horrific.
		Things like the police would show up to some house and there'd be like a drunk 10-year-old girl being assaulted by a group of men and they would arrest a little girl.
		It's beyond belief, but it's true.
		These things actually happened.
		The parents of the little girls would go and try to get the girls back, and the police would stop them and arrest them and allow the abuse to continue.
		And there's story after story after story about this, and that's before you even get into the aspect of these people eventually finally being arrested and then given either the lightest sentence possible or just let out completely in some cases.
		This is all on purpose.
		It's by design.
		It tells you sort of everything you need to know about what the priorities are of the people in charge of Britain right now.
		We have this story from NPR. UK leader Starmer slams lies and misinformation after Musk attacks.
		UK leader Starmer slammed the lies and misinformation after attacks from Elon Musk.
		What those lies and misinformation are, they can't exactly say.
		They are, however, undermining UK democracy, which, let's be clear, it should be undermined.
		It should be destroyed.
		If the outcome is what it has been, it is not fit for purpose.
		It is not just failing to do the job that it's supposed to do, but actually doing the opposite.
		A lot, especially in terms of the American justice system.
		But it would be one thing if they just didn't get involved.
		It actually wouldn't be that big of a deal.
		Because if you had a bunch of Pakistanis move into a neighborhood and start raping little girls, likely without any sort of authority there, without any sort of police intervention.
		The parents and friends and family of these children would just go and kill all of the people that did it, and then the problem would be solved very quickly.
		Considering the fact that there is such a small number of these foreign rape gangs compared to the wider population, wouldn't be that big of an issue if the police just didn't get involved, didn't interfere in any way.
unidentified		Instead...
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		The government of the UK and the police work there exist solely to facilitate this happening.
		To actually collaborate with the rape gangs in order to provide victims and then cover up the consequences and shield them from backlash.
		And I'm not speaking metaphorically.
		I'm speaking literally.
		I mean, literally, they would go and stop men from getting their children back.
		The UK government ran orphanages that worked as child brothels for the Muslims.
		Literally.
		I mean, I'm not using exaggeration.
		I'm not using hyperbole.
		I'm speaking in complete earnestness here.
		They would run orphanages where little girls without parents, without anybody to protect them or look out for their interests.
		Would be rented out by the orphanages.
		They would be picked up at night by grown men who would take them, drug them, get them drunk, rape them, and then drop them off at the orphanage later that night or the next morning in a state of, you know, complete destruction.
		Just, you know, drop them off, drunk and abused and bleeding girls on the step of the orphanage.
		The orphanage would take them back in, clean them up, and rent them out the next night again.
		And nobody, you know, these kids don't have any family to protect them.
		They trust the government to protect them and the government instead whoring them out to their friends because I guarantee you it's like the wives of these Muslim men working in the orphanage and helping to facilitate this stuff.
		So this just happens over and over and has for years, you know, practically decades at this point, some estimates upwards of a million girls have been abused in this way.
		Which is what happens when you lose a war, by the way.
		The only thing I can even liken this to would be like Germany after World War II, where something like half of the women were raped.
		Maybe more.
		Maybe more than that.
		Half is probably a low number.
		German wolf children, they're forgotten orphans of World War II. Well, they weren't forgotten.
		They were abused beyond belief.
		And what people are learning is that this took a system-wide collaboration.
		This required awareness and participation from every level of the UK government.
		And now Prime Minister Keir Starmer at the time was a judge and was instrumental in this process.
		So Elon Musk is pointing this out.
		The billionaire CEO has taken an intense and erratic interest in British politics since the center-left Labour Party was elected in July.
		Musk has used his social network X to call for a new election and demand Starmer be imprisoned.
		On Monday, he posted an online poll for his 210 million followers on the proposition.
		Should America liberate the people of Britain from their tyrannical government?
		Asked about Musk's comments during a question session at a hospital near London, Starmer criticized, quote, those who are spreading lies and misinformation as far and as wide as possible.
		Particularly opposition conservative politicians in Britain who have echoed some of Musk's claims.
		Musk often posts on X about the UK, retweeting criticism of Starmer and the hashtag two-tier cure, shorthand for the unsubstantiated claim that Britain has a two-tier policing.
		Which it, look, I don't know what we have to do here.
		But clearly they realize that just calling people racist isn't as effective as it once was.
		And so they've moved on from claiming that the facts you're spreading are by nature bigoted or discriminatory to claiming that it's misinformation and disinformation.
		And these are just really already completely meaningless words when applied by these people to things that are just absolutely Undeniably true, like the two-tier policing, which is codified officially.
		There are judges from the bench saying that crimes against Asian girls will be treated more severely and with more importance than the people who abuse Asian girls.
		Asian is what they say, another euphemism.
		Muslim, Pakistani, Southeast Asian people.
		They say, crimes against Asian girls, these have to be punished severely because these poor minorities aren't white.
		But the white girls, they're fine.
		They're fine.
		Crimes against them won't be treated with the same seriousness that crimes against non-white people will be treated with.
		If that's not two-tier policing, I don't know what is.
		They say unsubstantiated claims.
		That just means that they're ignoring the substantiation.
		They're ignoring the evidence that is very clear, undeniable, frank, and in your face that this is exactly what's happening.
		They just deny it's happening as if that's their right to do, as if reality itself depends on their acknowledgement.
		It doesn't.
		Talks about far-right protesters being treated more harshly than pro-Palestinian or Black Lives Matter demonstrators during summer anti-immigrant violence across the UK. Elon Musk tweeted, civil war is inevitable.
		It's not, though, because what happened in response to the gangs of people taken to the streets after several little girls were stabbed to death by an immigrant?
		Well, they all got arrested.
		Even people who simply posted about the riots were arrested and given massive and severe prison penalties.
		While simultaneously, literal murderers and rapists were being let out just six months into their jail term.
		So, you tell me it's not two-tier policing.
		You have situations in the UK. I'm not making these up.
		I'm not exaggerating them for...
		Two people killed a young boy with a machete, and they were released in six months.
		They got six months of jail for a brutal machete murder, and people who posted articles online saying, if this is true, this is bad, were given two-year prison sentences.
		Tell me this isn't two-tier police.
	It's not even two-tier policing.
	I mean, we almost lack the words for this level of discrepancy.
	Two years for a Facebook post or six months for chopping a kid up with a machete.
	And you're telling me there isn't something dysfunctional about this?
	Yeah, I'm completely in favor of a crusade to the UK.
	I mean, if there was any consistency in our foreign policy, America, as we speak, would be airdropping crates of AR-15s into white neighborhoods in the UK.
	And encouraging them to take down their tyrannical government.
unidentified		Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		In sheer numbers and statistics, the UK is far, far more tyrannical than Russia.
		Now, we're perfectly willing to supply all the weaponry needed to attack Russia on the basis of their anti-democratic position or their tyrannical nature because they imprisoned some guy named Novani who was a CIA-trained cutout.
		Of course, we have to go to war with them.
		They hate democracy because they're attacking Ukraine whose president refuses to leave office or hold elections despite his You know, constitutionally allowed tenure being expired years ago.
		Whereas in the UK, they imprison many, many more people for their speech as a percentage or just sheer numbers compared to somewhere like Russia.
		You know, except for maybe like Saudi Arabia and Iran, they are, you know, one of the most tyrannical and oppressive regimes in the world today.
		Again, if we had any sort of consistency in our foreign policy and in our obligation to stand up against tyrannical governments and empower the people beneath to rise up and take them over, we would legitimately be dropping bombs on Westminster.
		We'd be providing the soccer hooligans with high-tech suicide drones.
		Which would be cool.
		Which would be cool.
		We should do that.
		I know people sort of mock it and say like, because one of the responses is like, well, this is why the UK shouldn't have given up their guns.
		And people mock that and act like that isn't important.
		It's actually very important.
		It's actually a major aspect of this whole Conflict that the Brits have been totally disarmed and are unable to defend themselves.
		So they have to rely entirely on the police, and the police are facilitating the abuse.
		Okay?
		So, it doesn't mean that everybody who participated in these rape gangs would be hunted down and killed if only the UK citizens had guns.
		But a few of them would be, and then the rest of them would really have to consider that.
		Possibility.
		They have to really think about who exactly they target.
		In fact, I had a video yesterday.
		Maybe I'll drag it in because it does actually relate to exactly what we're talking about here because it's actually an interview with a convicted child abuser and I guess kidnapper about how he would identify potential victims.
		Maybe I didn't pull that.
		Maybe I didn't pull that video in.
		I didn't pull it in because it's actually fairly obvious.
		I will put it in this video about the English people we'll go to in just a second.
		But basically they asked this pedophile, like, how would you choose your victims?
		He'd say, well, I'd look at their families.
		And if their dad was dangerous, I would avoid them.
		And so it was actually posted on X with the...
		Phrase, be dangerous.
		Actually, I remember now.
		I didn't download it.
		I did retweet it, though.
		If the crew wants to grab that.
		But it's a short clip, and it's just that.
		It's the pedophile saying, if I thought the dad would protect his daughter, I would choose a different victim.
		And this is extremely, extremely, extremely common with pedophiles of all stripes.
		You go after orphans.
		You go after people with a broken family life.
		You go after people whose...
		Mother is a single mother, and the dad's not in the picture.
		Because they are thinking about self-preservation.
		And they have to weigh their, you know, fear of retribution to their desire to commit these crimes.
		They have a very strong desire to commit these crimes, but they're not going to commit them if they think that the dad is going to kick the door down and shoot him in the head with a shotgun.
		This is a very real thing they have to concern themselves with.
		Now, the Muslims in the UK, and then also, you know, they have to think like, okay, well, what if I get caught and I get arrested and then I'll have to spend the rest of my life as a child molester in federal prison, which means I'll spend the rest of my life as somebody's bitch in a concrete block, living in a concrete square.
		They have to consider that too.
		Now, then you have the Muslims in the UK who The dads don't have guns.
		They don't even have knives.
		They certainly can't get a gang together to go, you know, just beat people with sticks because, you know, that'll be considered terrorism, a far-right atrocity, and the police will come down on them.
		They also don't have to worry about, like, getting caught and being punished by the state because the state prioritizes the appearance of...
		Diverse, peaceful coexistence, regardless of the reality.
		And this again goes to, so let's go again.
		Let's just look at, from a pedophile himself, from a convicted pedophile, the way in which he judges who to go after and who to avoid.
		Let's watch.
unidentified		Were there certain characteristics that you looked for in children before molesting them?
		I also looked at their families.
		If I thought the father was a threat, I would not approach the child.
		Become a threat.
		Big missiles are threatening.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Shotgun cocking is a lot more threatening.
		Pistol in your face is a lot more threatening.
		So again, this also all goes back to something that we talked about quite a bit, which is the necessary supremacy of the system.
		And it's a communistic thing, right?
		We talked about this with the starvation, the millions, potentially hundreds of millions of people who starve to death under communism, and they starve to death in order to uphold the illusion of the superiority of the system.
		The system...
		As they see it, it says that communism is right and private property is wrong, and so they have to expropriate the land from the farmers and turn it over to the local commune.
		And theoretically, because communism is such a superior system, we'll get more food out of it.
		And so they set that standard and they have that assumption.
		Instead of acknowledging that they don't achieve that standard, the assumption doesn't match reality, Just lie.
		Because it's necessary for them.
		They have to uphold the system.
		They have to prioritize the system.
		They have to bend reality to comport with the system rather than bend the system to comport with reality.
		It's the same thing happening here where under their delusion, diversity and multiculturalism is superior and has to be.
		And so if you have evidence that it's not, the evidence has to go away.
		You can't change your mind.
		You can't say, oh, it turns out...
		That bringing in millions upon millions of extremist Muslims who are open about the fact they see white girls as trash and dogs, that that doesn't work and that leads to abuse and that leads to massive violations on the natives of the island.
		That can't be acknowledged.
		That can't be justified.
		All they can do is bury that.
		Ignore it, hide it, and try to disguise it statistically.
		Because the system must be upheld.
		Because the delusion must come first and foremost, regardless of the damage, pain, suffering, and humiliation it causes.
		So again, Elon Musk has broached this topic and has been going hard against it for a while, which is a very good thing.
		Again, it's nothing new, nothing new.
		There have been some publications of the trial transcripts and stuff that people didn't know before, but it's all just elaboration on details about what we've known forever, which is just how incredibly abusive these systems have become.
		So again, they can call these lies and misinformation, but what mostly people are publishing are official court transcripts from the UK government themselves.
		So how are you calling it misinformation or a lie?
		Now, there are some ways that they are statistically trying to manipulate statistics in order to downplay the catastrophe that the UK government has inflicted on its own people.
		And we'll disabuse them of those ideas on the other side of the commercial break.
		We'll show you some statistics that illustrate exactly how widespread, monumental, and horrific this problem truly is.
		I do want to remind you that Dr. Jones Naturals now has two of our top-selling and most popular products ever in stock to allow you to take your energy focus and clarity to the next level, the energy essentials from Dr. Jones Naturals.
		For the first time ever, Dr. Jones Naturals is pairing two best-selling products, TurboForce and Vitamin Mineral Fusion, at an unprecedented 30% off.
		This dynamic duo combines high energy with nutrient-packed vitamins to fuel your day from start to finish.
		You can boost your focus, stamina, and vitality with TurboForce Plus and replenish your body with essential vitamins and minerals from Vitamin Mineral Fusion.
		Whether you're tackling your to-do list or hitting the gym, the essential energy pack has you covered.
		Get yours today and unlock your full potential at drjonesnaturals.com.
		And I'll tell you, folks, if you were to ask me or somebody in real life were to ask me, what product should I get from InfoWars.com?
		These would probably be the top two on my list.
		Vitamin Mineral Fusion.
		And TurboForce Plus are just incredible.
		Vitamin Mineral Fusion, of course, is just like the best multivitamin you could ever take, but it tastes great, and it's a fruit punch mix.
		And then TurboForce is like the strongest cup of coffee ever, but no calm down.
		It's amazing.
		DrJonesNaturals.com Welcome back, folks.
unidentified		Welcome to the UK and England in general.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Europe in general as well.
unidentified		The thing is, it's...
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It's crazy that any of this ever...
		was allowed to happen.
		This is not something that it should have taken Muslim rape gangs to identify what a What a terrible proposition this was to allow in an infinite number of foreigners into Europe.
		How did you think this was going to go?
		What did you think was going to happen?
		And there's never been a moment.
		It's not like there was a honeymoon period where it was like, wow, they let in all these foreigners and...
		The GDP went up and everything started to go really well.
		And then there's a little bit too much.
		Then maybe it happened a little bit too rapidly and things started to go downhill.
		We're trying to reclaim that honeymoon period where things were great.
		It was never great.
		It was never good.
		It was never great.
		It's been a problem the entire time.
		There's been absolutely no benefit.
		Every claimed potential benefit has been proven utterly false.
		The claim constantly made.
		And again, just like DEI. Just like censorship, all this goes back to the banks, by the way.
		All this goes back to the Ponzi scheme of pension programs, where people pay into it their whole lives, but what they expect out is more than they paid into it.
		So you've got to have this theory and philosophy of infinite growth, which is impossible, especially with a population that isn't even replacing itself, which, of course, was also deliberately imposed through poisoning food and water.
		Educating people out of their natural inclination to get married and have children.
		You have to pull a lot of psychological levers to get people away from that basic survival instinct.
		So all that's been done on purpose.
		But the argument is always that, well, we've got to have the pensions filled.
		We've got to bring in these workers.
		And then you bring in a million people.
		None of them actually work.
		They all go on welfare.
		The funds that you were intending to...
		You know, replenish by bringing them in instead of drained to an even more rapid degree.
		There's absolutely no assimilation that takes place.
		I mean, this is nonsense from the very beginning.
		It is a completely ridiculous proposition to make, and yet people accepted this.
		And again, there was no honeymoon period.
		There's no point where they could point to it and go, see, it's working.
		Let's keep doing it.
		It never, it never, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever, ever worked.
		So why do they keep doing it?
		Of course, the answer is the purpose of a system is what it does.
		It was never about benefiting Europe.
		It was never about benefiting the European people, certainly.
		It was never actually about even the excuses they made about filling up pensions.
		If it was, then the instant that it was realized that, okay, not only are these people not paying into pensions, they're actually all going on welfare and costing us a much, much greater amount of money.
		Like, this is...
		Insane it's gotten to this point.
		Just completely, I'm flabbergasted.
		It is beyond reason how they could have achieved this.
		If you really want to get into the history, I mean, all this goes back to Napoleon and Nathan Rothschild buying up the entire British economy for pennies on the pound.
		Following the defeat at Waterloo, that classic story.
		And it's a classic story of how not only the weaponization of information, the fact that banks had better information networks and intelligent networks than the governments that they're supposedly operating under.
		This is the whole thing, and we'll tell the story again in case people haven't heard it.
		But England was at war with Napoleon.
		It was coming down to the final battle at Waterloo.
		And if England were to have lost this battle at Waterloo, they would have been in a lot of trouble.
		That would have been the war was lost.
		It would have meant that the British economy collapsed.
		It just would have been horrible if they would have lost.
		So on the eve of the battle, on the eve the battle happens, all of England is waiting on pins and needles to find out the outcome.
		Did they win or did they lose?
		And everybody knew that the Rothschilds, because of their international banking, and this is what brought the Rothschilds to prominence, by the way.
		None of this is conspiracy theory.
		This is just history.
		This is just actual, legitimate history of the financial system.
	The strength and the importance of the Rothschilds came from having banks in every major European capital.
	This was all designed by, I think it was Amschel Rothschild was the first.
	And he sent his five sons to the five capitals of Europe.
	And they developed, essentially they developed the paper check, right?
	You could deposit, typically how it would work is you deposit money in a bank and then you had to go get that money out of that bank.
	But what they were able to do was you deposit money in Vienna, you travel to Berlin with a piece of paper saying that you deposited money and you can get that money out in Berlin, meaning you can travel without having to haul all of your worldly possessions with you.
	And in order to facilitate, These transactions, the Rothschilds had to develop a very, very secure and efficient information intelligence sharing system so that you could confirm, okay, yes, they really did deposit money here.
	Yet, you know, here's how much money is in all these different banks, you know, across borders.
	And so they developed an intelligence system that was far superior to even the national intelligence services that existed at the time, which England had a very advanced one.
	France had an even more advanced intelligence system under Napoleon.
	That was one of his great strengths as an emperor as well.
	And so following Waterloo, everybody knew, all right, the Rothschilds are going to be the first to know the results.
	And so that morning, Rothschild goes into the stock exchange and starts being very public and very openly selling everything.
	Obviously sending the signal that Waterloo was lost, meaning that the British economy would soon collapse.
	So he's selling all of the stocks he possibly can to get the most out of it before the news comes down and before the stock market crashes.
	Now, this is one of those like, oh, but I didn't say it, did I? Well, I'm not touching you.
	I'm not touching you, right?
	It's this like, well, I never said that we lost water.
	I just started selling everything I owned.
	But knowing that everybody's going to take that signal and go, oh, crap, he knows something we don't.
	He's got a better intelligence service than our newspapers or our government.
	So he's the first off the mark.
	So this is the power of intelligence systems.
	It's the fact that they sprang out of the international trade of banks.
	And that's where OSS and CIA, all of it got started as an outgrowth of these established intelligence networks from the banks in order to facilitate the cross-border trading of currency.
	So basically, while Nathaniel Rothschild is very publicly selling everything he owns for pennies on the dollar, signaling to everybody we lost Waterloo, he knows actually we won Waterloo.
	The stock market is about to explode and go up.
	So he's got his agents behind the scenes buying everything up at these rock-bottom prices so that when finally the news comes in that Waterloo, the Brits were victorious at Waterloo, then stock market rose.
	But by that point...
	The Rothschilds had already scooped up basically the entire stock market.
	And that's basically how they took control of the English financial system totally around the end of the 18th century.
	Okay?
	So ever since then, I don't know if you've noticed, but every other royal house in Europe has collapsed.
	Like, at the point that he did that, France was the only one that had a...
	A different setup than they had previously, right?
	Because of the French Revolution.
	Now, after Napoleon, there was an attempt to restore the monarchy, but it never really took.
	So Germany, Austria, Russia, all these places had monarchs, had royal families that were the actual rulers of the country.
	Since then, systematically, one by one, they've been destroyed, replaced with something else, except for England, where the monarchy has been forced through Hook and crook and blackmail and manipulation to sideline themselves and act as a tourist attraction and not actually impose any of their royal will on the people.
	But it also means that there's this interesting mechanism by which UK could save itself.
	At any point, the king still has the power, and this is one of the tricks of the UK monarchy.
	Is they pretend to not have power when they haven't actually given up anything?
	And still to this day you'll read articles.
	It's like, this parliamentary person argued this.
	And this person argued this.
	And they went back and forth.
	And this committee did this.
	And this committee did this.
	And then when you get to the last line, it's like, and then the queen decided this and this happened.
	Now it would be the king.
	But they still do have all the political power that they've ever had.
	They just don't exercise it in public very much.
	But it's interesting that they don't wield it more effectively for their own people.
	Like, clearly, they have thrown in their lot with the globalists and are perfectly, you know, happy to sacrifice their own people to maintain their position on top of the, I don't know, rambunctious masses.
	And of course, it's not a coincidence that one of the prime compatriots and collaborators of Jeffrey Epstein was Prince Andrew.
	Because again, the UK government has been all but controlled by the forces of finance since the late 1800s.
	And they've used England as a headquarters for destroying every other royal family in Europe.
	Maintaining the UK. And, you know, occupying the British Empire as their force of arms for the banking, the international banking sector.
	That's just a little history as to, you know, how we got to this point.
	Why UK finds itself in the situation that it finds itself in.
	And InfoWars has a story about how this is going down now with UK's Starmer dismissing the rape gang outrage as far-right bandwagon.
	While Musk slams state-sponsored evil, after news broke that the UK's safeguarding minister, Jess Phillips, blocked a public inquiry into the country's prolific rape gangs, Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who allegedly covered for Jimmy Seville, went into victim mode.
	Dismissing the outrage is simply part of the playbook of the far right.
	The same thing he said after a Muslim radical stabbed eight children, killing three in the Southport massacre.
	The playbook of the far right.
	This is all part and parcel of the playbook of the far right, to tell the truth about things, to care about the people who live in our country, and to want to defend them against the systematic sexual assault of their children.
	What a typical far right playbook.
	Insane.
	Completely insane.
	Again, we should be dropping crates of AR-15s into Liverpool and, you know, sending...
	American military contractors to help to foster the revolution there, because if we actually cared about defeating tyrannical governments and imposing democracy on undemocratic countries, the UK might be at the top of that list.
	That, of course, isn't what we're actually doing anywhere, ever.
	So, there's that.
	Now, again, the fact that this even has gotten this far is outrageous and nonsensical.
	From the Telegraph published on the 4th of January this year, asylum seekers drain money from Dutch state for generations.
	Study will bolster arguments that failure to curb migration will put pressure on public services.
	It's like, why do they talk like this is speculative?
	Why do they say things like, we don't know the answer or that this isn't already happening to a massive degree?
	Why do they say...
	It will bolster arguments that failure to curb migration will put pressure on public services.
	Public services are, as we speak, collapsing due to the weight of migration.
	But everything has to be phrased dishonestly.
	They can't say anything honest ever, these people.
	Asylum seekers arriving in the Netherlands become a burden for the state for generations, a new study has found.
	As if you needed a study to tell you this, immigrants entering the country as students or to reunite with their families were also found to bring negative net contributions.
	A discussion paper by the Institute of Labor Economics says the burden on the state was not from the government spending on these groups, but from lower tax and Social Security contributions.
	Again, this is the same in Germany, it's the same in the UK, it's the same in Ireland, it's the same everywhere.
	They bring these people in on the basis of we need them to bolster the economy.
	They all go on welfare and drain the economy.
	Like, it isn't complicated.
	It's not confusing.
	It's not something that, you know, is difficult to wrap your mind around.
	Fairly simple, actually.
	It's just so insane.
	It's hard for people to believe, I think.
	They'd rather call you racist and not actually contend with the facts that you're putting out.
	Cillian at Silcom LFC on X. It says this.
	Now, people have been posting, I don't think I saved any of them because they're just nonsense, but they're like, what's the problem with, why is everybody talking about Muslim rape gangs when 85% of the rapes in the UK are done by white Anglo-Saxons?
	And this is just the same argument they make here.
	Well, Americans commit crime too.
	Why are you so concerned about illegal immigrants?
	Because crime committed by the native population is something that everybody has to deal with, every country has to deal with.
	It's a necessity.
	It's because they're your fellow countrymen.
	Some of them are going to be bad, and you have to deal with that.
	That's natural.
	There's nothing anybody can ever do to stop that.
	There's going to be crime, and people are going to commit it against each other.
	There's no big problem with that.
	That's not an excuse to bring in millions of criminals and allow them to commit crimes in your country.
	That is just a ridiculous nonsense argument.
	That everybody should be able to laugh at at this point.
	Anytime anybody tries to make this argument.
	But that is the argument that they're trying to make.
	And so we're going to look at some statistics and see what the influence of the Muslim mass migration has been to the UK. Sillian says, despite representing less than 7% of the British population, Muslims represent 67% of terror attacks, 30% of birth defects due to cousin marriages,
	84% of child gang rapes, Go figure.
	And then Neil Murray notes under this that this is with authorities covering up their crimes.
	Imagine without that.
	So, you know, when you hear that 84% of child gang rapes are committed by 7% of the population, you have to understand that's just the gang rapes that they've actually Prosecuted and not covered up, which is probably equally as high.
	As Carl Benjamin, Sargon of Akkad, notes, there were 1,400 victims of the rape gangs in Rotterdam, which is only 11,000 Muslims, according to the 2021 census.
	So around 5,500 men.
	That is one victimized young girl for every four Muslim men.
	This is a staggeringly high number.
	It depends on how you look at the statistics.
	But yeah, one abused, raped, gang-raped young British girl for every four Muslim men that you allow into the country.
	These are the Muslim rape gangs in Radar.
	So there's that.
	Let's go to clip number 11. This is how Brits are feeling about this right now.
	I was talking to the crew during the break about, you know, airdropping AR-15s into UK to allow them the violent revolution that they deserve and would actually save their country.
	And, yeah, I think they'd go for it.
	I think there's enough Brits right now that if they weren't disarmed...
	If they didn't live in a 1984-style tyranny, they would be happy to participate in the violent struggle for freedom.
	And it's really through sheer demoralization and suppression that this hasn't occurred yet.
	Let's look at some of the demoralized and suppressed Brits.
	And what they think about the situation.
unidentified		Clip number 11. England's England.
		And sometimes I don't even want to be here.
		Why's that?
		It's getting worse.
		Too many bloody foreigners.
		You look around, there's a foreigner.
		No more England.
		Might as well name it something else.
		Hell.
		Hell?
		Why hell?
		There's too many foreigners.
		Ingrid's a jar.
		There we go.
		What he said.
		What's that?
		Immigrants are jarring.
		What does that mean, jarring?
		Annoying.
		Send them back.
		You have homeless English people not getting housed, but you have immigrants that come here.
		They're illegal and they get housed.
		It's a joke.
		So you're saying just illegal...
		But legal...
		I just asked about legal migrants.
		Yeah, but even if they're legal immigrants, they still shouldn't be put over English people.
		No.
		We spend too much tax money on immigrants, and I think that's a joke.
		And we should worry about our own people before others.
		Do you think the political class generally are doing that then?
		No.
		I think the Conservative party is an absolute joke, and young people in this country don't have a voice, and it makes me sick.
		So if you could vote, lads, who would you vote for?
		Who would I vote for?
		Reform UK, probably.
		That's the one.
		Reform UK. Get rid of him.
		Yes.
		So the media would say that people that vote Reform UK, older, boomers, racists...
		It's Reform UK, though.
		Hold on one sec.
		But we've got a young guy, mixed heritage, who's saying Reform UK. So what are those people wrong about?
		What attracts you to Reform UK? Reform UK is that if you're an actual English citizen, you actually have a voice in what happens in this country.
		But then with a Conservative Party, we don't ever get a voice.
		So...
		They just...
		Conservatives, just rich people doing what they want to make the most money that they can, which has always been for ages, but Reform UK, actual working-class English people have a voice in what happens in the country.
		We were talking to some young boys over there a moment ago, and they really surprised me because they said they were into Reform UK. Yeah, that's what everyone's been saying.
		Everyone around CHI has been saying that they're like Reform UK, they're very into it.
		I haven't really heard many people talking about Labour.
		It's mainly just been Reform UK, like people, you know, like 15, 16 and everything just been talking about.
		That's really, that will surprise many people.
		Yeah.
		That's kind of strange because most people think Reform voters, older, homeowners, blokes in their 50s and 60s, just saying it's kids in Chichester.
		Sorry, kids, young adults in Chichester.
		Yeah, I think, yeah, there's a lot of people that are just, if you ask anyone around here, like, 15, 16, maybe even young, they'll just say, like, it's all about Reform UK. They don't really have an opinion on, like, Conservatives or Labour, or it's just, yeah.
		Why, though?
		What's driving them to that opinion?
		I don't know.
		I think it's because TikTok, because there's been a lot of things about Reform UK coming from, like, other teens in other places, it'll be like they'll kind of be influenced by that.
		And it will be like, because social media has got such an impact and influence on other young people, it will be mainly just because other people are saying Reform UK, it will be everyone else.
		I think it's kind of just more of a bias thing.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		So, of course, Reform UK is Nigel Farage's new party.
		And again, it's not even that they necessarily have all the right answers.
		It's just like the people in the UK just want...
		Somebody to at least pretend to care for them and at least do something to protect and serve them.
		They're in a very similar situation to us here in America.
		We have some more videos to go to.
		So again, they have called UK's Starmer has dismissed the rape gang outrage as a far-right bandwagon.
		And yeah, basically said that this is all just far right, meaning it's dangerous and hateful to care about little English girls being systematically abused and having their abusers protected by the UK government.
		Here's a member of parliament trying to express that this is not far right.
		This is actually very normal.
		Let's go to clip number 10 here.
unidentified		It is not far right to stand up for victims of mass rape.
		And smearing and smearing and smearing people is those concerns.
		People want to hear the statement.
		Smearing people who raise those issues is exactly how this ended up getting covered up in the first place.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so there's him getting booed for saying that's not a far-right position to care about the massive rape gang controversy.
		And again, that's just the far-out, most apparent manifestation of the cancer that's destroying Britain from the inside out.
		Because it's not just the rape gangs that get covered up and the lives that get destroyed because of that.
		It's the economic destruction that's wrought.
		It's the educational destruction that's being wrought.
		It is the massive amounts of money spent on the public services for these people who have never contributed anything to the UK, showed up a week ago under false pretenses and then raped your daughter.
		They're the ones getting all the services and benefits.
		Welcome back.
		Ladies and gentlemen, third hour of American Journal is on.
		I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from the Infowars headquarters here in Austin, Texas.
		I'm trying to find this video that goes along with this article.
		Although I'm not sure.
		I don't know.
		I don't remember where I saw it.
		I think it was Asmongold.
		Isn't he a...
		He's a gamer streamer, right?
		There's this game called Marvel Rivals.
		And the story's at Infowars.com.
		Marvel Rivals criticized for censoring Winnie the Pooh and other topics to please China's government.
		Players encountered restrictions as Marvel Rivals censors everyday phrases in its chat system.
		A newly released superhero PVP game, player-versus-player game, Media Rivals, developed by Chinese studio NetEase Games, has ignited controversy with its heavy-handed censorship policies.
		While the game offers an engaging multiplayer experience, ongoing issues like play-to-win model and peculiar censorship choices have attracted significant criticism.
		As reported by Asmongold, in line with many Chinese-developed games, media rivals censors phrases like Winnie the Pooh, Free Taiwan, and Tiananmen Square Massacre in its in-game chat.
		Players have reported that typing Winnie the Pooh triggers a flag for inappropriate content, a decision rooted in political sensitivities.
		That, of course, stems from the fact that people were saying President Xi Jinping looked like Winnie the Pooh.
		So now if you type Winnie the Pooh in the Marvel rival game chat, it censors you.
		And we've got to find the video because it's this gamer streamer, Asmongold, sitting there trying to...
		Type out things that, you know, would be censored by China.
		And it goes so far as to prevent him from typing the year 1989. Since that was the year that the Tiananmen Massacre took place in China, you're not allowed to mention that the year exists, 1989. Someone asked me, what year were you born?
		I couldn't respond.
		I'd say it'd have to be the year between 1988 and 1990. I can't say the year, though, because of censorship.
		And really what it goes to is reminding us where we end up if you don't put a stop to censorship.
		How insane and oppressive it can truly be.
		We have that video?
		Let's go to that now, because this is Asmongold, popular streamer, trying to type very normal and non-objectionable phrases into the Marvel Rivals game.
		Unable to do so because it's developed and maintained by China.
		Let's watch.
unidentified		You know what I also heard?
		I heard that you can't say free Taiwan or free Hong Kong and Marvel rivals.
		Now, you guys know what I always say.
		Trust but verify.
		I'm going to log in.
		I'm going to check it right now.
		Okay, testing.
		This is me.
		Free.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Three times free Taiwan, it says this is inappropriate content.
unidentified		Taiwan sucks!
		Free Taiwan!
		It contains inappropriate language.
		Wow!
		Okay, alright.
		Free Tibet.
		Taiwan, number one.
		That's a nope.
		Tiananmen Square Massacre.
		It didn't happen.
		You're not allowed to lie in this video game.
		Try 1989. Okay.
		This is gonna be fine.
		You cannot even type it.
		You cannot say Dalai Lama.
		How about 9-11 was an inside job?
		Well, I mean, of course you can say that.
		Try Winnie the Pooh.
		Okay, Wuhan virus.
		How about virus?
		How about Wuhan?
		So you can say Wuhan and you can say virus, but you sure as hell can't say Wuhan virus.
		Kim Jong-un?
		Okay.
		Stalin?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		You can't type Mao Zedong as evil.
		So again, this is where censorship goes if you don't actually uphold free speech as a value.
		Anything can be censored completely arbitrarily.
		All right, welcome back, folks.
		This is the American Journal.
		I'm going to take your calls for the last hour.
		I'll open up the phone lines now.
		The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
		1-877-789-2539.
		Let's talk about Israel, shall we?
		Yeah, let's do it.
		Biden's State Department approves informal last-minute $8 billion arm deal for Israel.
		Informal.
		It's just a handshake deal to give away $8 billion of your money.
		Don't you love how they can just do that?
		The Biden administration is pushing $8 billion arms deal to Israel, including missiles, artillery, shells, and precision munitions, despite mounting evidence of genocide in Gaza.
		Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, have labeled Israel's actions in Gaza as genocide, yet the U.S. continues to arm and fund its military campaign.
		The proposed deal includes weapons like Hellfire missiles and 155mm artillery shells, which have been used in attacks on civilian targets, including schools and hospitals.
		Despite calls from Democrats and human rights groups to condition arms sales, Biden has refused to hold Israel accountable for its violations of international law.
		Israel relies heavily on military U.S. aid, with 78% of its weapons coming from the U.S., enabling its ongoing campaign of destruction in Gaza.
		The State Department pushes a $8 billion arms deal to Israel without congressional approval.
		Of course, they'll treat this as a major achievement.
		These are the types of achievements they are able to achieve.
		They simply sign checks for $8 billion of other people's money to facilitate and continue.
		a genocidal operation in Gaza.
		The timing of this deal is particularly grotesque.
		It comes as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right government continue to escalate their war efforts, flattening entire neighborhoods, bombing hospitals, and targeting civilians with impunity.
		The U.S.-supplied weapons being used in these attacks are not just tools of war, they're instruments of genocide.
		From the small-diameter bombs that obliterated a school in June, killing 40 civilians, to the artillery shells that have turned Gaza into a wasteland, every weapon sent to Israel is soaked in Palestinian blood.
unidentified		Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And of course, everybody knows that.
		I mean, everybody knows this.
		Everybody who's paying attention knows that this is true.
		It is beyond horrific what Israel's been doing for a year and more at this point.
		However...
		The wider American and really Western public is prevented from knowing this.
		And there's a very simple reason why.
		This was published yesterday on the 6th of January.
		BBC Middle East head is CIA Mossad collaborator.
		The British Broadcasting Corporation's senior editor at the Middle East desk is a former employee at a central intelligence agency propaganda unit.
		And a collaborator with the intelligence agency Mossad, an investigation by the Mint Press News has revealed.
		Rafi Berg, who heads the BBC's Middle East desk, has come under increased scrutiny after at least 13 staff at the broadcaster spoke out against bias towards Israel, stating that his entire job is to water down everything that is too critical of Israel and that he holds wild amounts of power.
		In the newsroom, according to a December investigative report by Dropside News, the employees revealed that there exists a culture of extreme fear at the BBC about publishing anything critical of Israel and that Berg himself plays a key role in turning its coverage into systemic or systematic Israeli propaganda.
		Berg joined BBC in 2001. Great timing as a world news writer and producer.
		According to the Mint Press News, citing Berg's LinkedIn profile, amongst other sources, Berg was an employee at the U.S. State Department's Foreign Broadcasting Information Service three years before joining the BBC. The FBIS was an open-source intelligence component of the Central Intelligence Agency's Directorate of Science and Technology.
		It monitored, translated, and disseminated within the U.S. government openly available news and information from sources outside the United States.
		Reads FBIS' Wikipedia profile.
		Moreover, in a 2020 interview with the Jewish Telegraph, Berg has admitted that he worked for the CIA. One day I was taken to the side and told, you may or may not know that we are part of the CIA, but don't go telling people.
		I was absolutely thrilled and was not so much of a surprise because the application process was enormous.
		It took 10 months.
		They went through my character and background with a fine-tooth comb, asking if I'd ever visited communist countries, and if I had, did I form any relationships while I was there?
		In terms of the Mossad connection, the Mint Press News investigation revealed that Berg has developed deep professional relationships with Israeli intelligence agency Mossad while he was working on his book The Red Sea Spies, the true story of Mossad's fake diving resort, which tells the story of the agency's operation to clandestinely smuggle Ethiopian Jews into Israel.
		In introducing his book, Berg said that he wrote it in collaboration with Mossad commander Danny Limor, who he relied on extensively as he knew next to nothing about the story and his background before writing it.
		Limor opened numerous doors and was able to secure over 100 hours of interview with Israeli military and intelligence officials, including the head of Mossad.
		And in addition to that, of course, I didn't pull this in, but I think I can find it.
		CNN, everything CNN posted had to be about the war in Gaza had to be approved by an Israeli government censor.
		So the biggest news outlets in the Western world, including government funded BBC and news stalwart CNN, Stallward CNN.
		Both were headed by editors who made sure that all of their coverage conformed with the propaganda requirements of the Israeli military.
		CNN runs Gaza coverage past Jerusalem team operating under shadow of IDF sensor.
		That story from The Intercept.
		So just think about all of the acknowledged genocidal activity of Israel over the last year that has gotten through to the mainstream public.
		And then think about what the coverage would look like if mainstream coverage wasn't solely controlled by people actually...
		They're engaged in Israeli propaganda.
		It's, again, just crazy.
		It's crazy that we allow this to happen.
		It's crazy that this is just acknowledged and real.
		And if you ask CNN, they'll probably try to justify it.
		They'll probably sit there and go, yeah, well, this is where the information comes from.
		And Israel is our greatest ally, so we don't want to publish anything that hurts them.
		I mean, they're not shy about this.
		this it's not like this is secret and has to be uncovered they're like proud about it it's like when you know Prager University publishes things like did you know the CEO of Prager University is in the Mossad isn't that cool it's like no it's not actually it's not cool that we have our entire media apparatus managed and filtered by foreign propagandists that's not
		I don't know how else to express that other than that's crazy and terrible.
		And anti-Semitic.
		Right?
		Isn't it?
		Isn't it anti-Semitic when you say that the media is controlled by the Jews for the benefit of Israel?
		What if they're saying that in a braggadocious way like it's a good thing?
		Is it still anti-Semitic?
		I don't know.
		We'll have to get an expert on to discuss.
		Let's go down to quote number nine.
		This is a former CIA agent basically admitting that not only is our entire media establishment controlled directly, especially coverage of the Middle East by People with an acknowledged purpose of benefiting Israel with the coverage that they allow to get through.
		But that's also the case with the US government.
		Let's watch.
unidentified		Israel interferes in American elections.
		It has corrupted our Congress.
		Its head of government publicly rebukes our own head of state.
		One other very good reason why Israel should not receive billions of dollars in military assistance annually is its persistent espionage against the United States.
		Grant Smith has described how Friends of Israel stole enriched uranium from a Pennsylvania refinery to create a nuclear arsenal.
		Israel, where government and business work hand in hand, has obtained significant advantage by systematically stealing American technology with both military and civilian applications.
		The U.S. developed technology is then reverse engineered and used by the Israelis to support their own exports.
		A 1996 Defense Investigative Service report noted that Israel has great success stealing technology by exploiting the numerous co-production projects that it has with the Pentagon.
		It says placing Israeli nationals in key industries is a technique utilized with great success.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Great success.
		They've had a lot of success in that.
		So there you go, folks.
		Is a Mossad and CIA collaborator.
		And you might ask how somebody could be collaborating with two intelligence services from different countries.
		And it's because they're the same organization.
		It's because they're pretty much the same organization with different labels depending on where they're headquartered.
		The Western media's coverage of Israel's genocidal war on Gaza has come under scrutiny for its alleged whitewashing and downplaying of Israeli war crimes.
		It's also been criticized for furthering several fake narratives pushed by Israel.
		According to an Al Jazeera investigation in October of last year, CNN aired a report that furthered the false claims regarding Hamas' presence inside the Al-Rantizi Children's Hospital in Gaza, which was bombed by Israel.
		CNN's international diplomatic editor Nick Robertson, who was one of the few international journalists to be allowed inside Gaza by the Israeli army, was shown a document on the wall of the hospital written in Arabic, which IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagari claimed was proof Hamas was using the facility to hide Israeli captives.
		But it wasn't a Hamas roster at all.
		It was a calendar and written in Arabic were the days of the week.
		But the report came out from Nick Robinson that just swallowed up Israel's claim, a journalist saying, At CNN told Al Jazeera.
		He added the footage was aired even after a Palestinian producer alerted her colleagues, including Robertson.
		So, again, Israel provides the weapons.
		I mean, U.S. provides their weapons to Israel.
		Israel uses those weapons to bomb hospitals.
		And then the coverage of the event is whitewashed and given coverage by Western media outlets who...
		Are happy to make the utterly false claim that this was a legitimate military target in order to cover up the genocidal nature of Israel's activity and America's participation in that genocide.
		So just multiple layers of the genocide industrial complex at work in perfect coordination here.
		And just another example of the way the BBC is an outlet of the UK government and that the UK government is totally taken over.
		By unfriendly actors with absolutely no interest in the truth or justice or the lives of the people under that government, but rather solely interested in using that government's power to their own ends in order to benefit a foreign state.
		It's typical at this point.
		Very typical.
		I'm going to go to one more video before we go out to your calls.
		This has to do with the Medal of Freedom winners.
		The winners!
		The people that were given the Medal of Freedom earlier this week by President Joe Biden.
		And, yeah, this doesn't mean anything anymore.
		The Medal of Freedom is not a thing worth anything at this point.
		And I think it all sort of started going downhill when Barack Obama presented it to, like, Ellen DeGeneres.
		I think at that point everybody should have recognized, okay, this is just, this is like the Oscars, right?
		It doesn't actually have to do with...
		Anything tangible or real like being the best movie doesn't win you the best Oscar anymore.
		It's about being the best movie with the required 50% gay black cast.
		And in this case, the Medal of Freedom presented to Bill Gates and Ellen DeGeneres doesn't elevate Ellen DeGeneres and Bill Gates.
		It denigrates the Medal of Freedom.
		That's how this works.
		Yeah, Tom Hanks gets one too.
		And they all enjoyed...
unidentified		Don't forget about Denzel.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		10,000 hot dogs after this.
		Did Denzel win too?
		Well, he deserves it.
unidentified		Yeah, he won this year.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I mean, hey, you can read scripts in front of a camera.
		You deserve the Medal of Freedom, I think.
		Of course, Ellen DeGeneres got it because I think she was the first lesbian.
		If I'm not mistaken, she was the first lesbian ever.
		So she got the Medal of Freedom for that incredibly...
		You know, brave transformation.
		It only got worse when on Sunday, the Medal of Freedom was given to just the worst people in the entire world.
		Let's go to clip number eight now.
		Watch.
unidentified		Here are some of the recipients of the Medal of Freedom for 2025. First, Hillary Clinton, who was involved in arming ISIS, left an ambassador to die, deleted thousands of incriminating emails, and had countless people around her dying suspiciously.
		Second, George Soros, the guy who funded mass illegal immigration, is behind Antifa, got crimes to explode worldwide, and funded some of the worst woke policies the world has ever seen.
		Third, Anna Wintour, the Vogue editor who never allowed Melania Trump on the cover.
		His friends with a bunch of Satanists protected the Balenciaga scandal.
		They literally did a movie showing how awful of a person she is, but she put Jill on the cover so.
		And last but not least, Jane Goodhall, who wants to depopulate the planet in her own words.
		I would like to reduce the number of people on the planet because there's too many of You want to win the Medal of Freedom?
		Then you gotta ask yourself.
		What inhumane atrocities are you willing to achieve?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		You gotta laugh.
		I mean, I don't know what else to do.
		I don't know what else to do.
		But yeah, if you want to win the...
		Oh, is that P. Diddy getting one and two?
		Well, good for him.
		That'll bring comfort to him in his jail cell.
		Handing it out to Emperor Palpatine.
		You might as well, right?
		You might as well.
		The Medal of Depopulation.
		The Medal of Being a Satanic Monster.
		Of course, it wasn't just that.
		The guy who took a photo with the attempted Trump assassin was given the Medal of Freedom from Joe Biden.
		So here's a guy receiving the Medal of Freedom.
		And just below that is a picture of him with his arm around the guy who tried to kill President Trump.
		You know, it's this type of stuff that, like, I don't want to do the whole cliche, what if the roles were reversed thing, but what if the roles were reversed?
		I mean, just imagine.
		I mean, can you imagine?
		You've got a guy who took a picture with a person who attempted to assassinate Donald Trump and he's winning the Medal of Freedom.
		Okay.
unidentified		All right.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Amazing.
		Really.
		Amazing.
		Let's go to your calls now.
		Tim in California, I want to talk about this story that we only barely covered.
		I never really got the full story on this.
		Tim in California, the FBI seized over 150 improvised explosive devices in a raid in Virginia.
		What is this about?
		Go ahead, Tim.
unidentified		Well, see, that's just, that's it.
		The question is the answer.
		The only details I have are what you're saying.
		I know that it's flying under the radar.
		The fellow's name is Brad Spafford, with a P like Peter, Spafford, Brad Spafford.
		And apparently, as you say, it is the largest cache of homemade explosives in FBI history.
		I thought, hey, that should be mentioned.
		If they walk into some guy's house with him and his wife and his kids and they find 150-plus homemade bombs already assembled, somebody should say something, but I haven't heard anybody say anything.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, it's surprising how quietly that story sort of flew under the radar.
unidentified		And then the other one.
		I want to be short because I don't want to stay long and I want other people to have a chance.
		But just quickly, today they also announced that Biden wants to put his thumb in Trump's eye one more time.
		And he's making a deal to let 11 of the Gitmo detainees, these Yemenis Gitmo detainees with ties to al-Qaeda, he's going to let them go to Oman.
		And this includes allegedly two bin Laden bodyguards.
		You know, all this, you know, at two minutes to midnight, right as he walks out the door, it's like, you know, here's your porcupine, Donald Trump.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yep.
		Yep.
		Of course, you know, it's nothing compared to the $80 billion given to the Taliban.
		I mean, it's just, yes, he's doing everything he possibly can before leaving office to leave Trump in the worst possible position because, you know, they care so much about the legitimate transfer of power.
		They're just doing absolutely everything they can to leave us off in a worse position.
		Because they're evil, and it's not that complicated.
		They're evil, scum people that run our country.
		That's the answer.
		Thanks for the call, Tim.
		Let's go to Wild in Wisconsin now.
		Let's talk about Orthodox Christmases today.
		Well, Merry Christmas to all of our Orthodox friends.
		Wild in Wisconsin, you're on the air.
unidentified		Merry Christmas.
		Today's Celestial Christmas, OG, Original Christmas.
		We look at the old calendars and prices have never been more important.
		Paul is bringing up that type of stuff.
		But I wanted to talk about the drones, drone tech.
		Do you know who did the first drone, Harrison?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I don't.
unidentified		The first drone vehicle with remote control was made by Nikola Tesla.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Oh, I did know that, yeah.
unidentified		Yeah, yeah, yeah.
		He was big into the wireless transmission of energy.
		And there was a big drone history made where over regular Christmas, NASA launched the Parker solar drone.
		I don't know if you saw this.
		And there's some wild video of it flying through the sun, like Icarus.
		And there's, like, noise they made.
		I bought the size of an SUV. It was $1.5 million.
		It was flying over half a million miles per hour to the sun's atmosphere.
		And I think it's amazing technology that they're able to do that.
		You know, you're literally flying into the sun.
		And it kind of just went in and out of the news.
		And I think it's a big important step for solar system colonization because we can also then manipulate the sun by using...
		Once again, Nikola Tesla technology, similar to the earthquake machine by manipulating the resonance on the sun.
		And I don't know, I thought it was a cool story.
		Not often you hear about an SUV-sized robot flying to the sun and taking video and audio footage.
		Do you see that?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I didn't see that.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I almost completely missed that.
unidentified		Yep, so that was pretty cool.
		And I think the same technology, Elon, will probably...
		Like this for Mars, they can do terraforming with the earthquake machine.
		You know where the biggest volcano is in the solar system?
		It's on Mars, Olympus Mars.
		So they can trigger that sucker and release a bunch of water and air in the atmosphere.
		You know, a lot of contemporaries say, you know, that's how Earth got its atmospheres from the volcanoes, which kind of makes sense.
		You know, so I thought it was pretty...
		Pretty cool science nerd stuff, which I know you like.
		And then also you were talking about, you know, the stuff in England.
		And it always bugs me when you talk about it.
		Not that you're not right.
		You're 100% right.
		But like the same stuff is going on here in the U.S., just like different angles and strategies.
		And overall, if you look in England and Germany, London, Paris, Berlin, wherever, it's just proof positive of the failure of the implication of Western multiculturalism.
		And how now it's like a breeding program.
		The white population is being bred out by foreigners.
		It's a common strategy used in all times, even the days of the ancient Egyptians.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yep, absolutely.
		No, you're exactly right.
		Same thing that Alexander the Great did with his troops going into a new area, and he'd give all of his troops brides to mix their blood and to breed the...
		Original inhabitants out of existence and create some sort of mulatto race with his troops.
		It's been going on forever.
		All this stuff has been going on forever.
		I've read on air before the speech by Augustus in the first century in Rome where he is mad at all the young men for not getting married and having babies because they're experiencing population collapse.
		It's incredibly common, actually.
		Probably the number one reason why.
		Empires or nations fall is because they get to a certain point of comfort and they stop producing.
		They stop reproducing.
		and the more barbarous cultures around them outbreed them and overtake them and often occupy them.
unidentified		Welcome back.
unidentified		Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		We're going to go out to your phone calls here momentarily.
		We have a few more stories to cover.
		Ones like this that are more and more common throughout the country today.
		New Jersey ends basic reading and writing skills requirements for teachers.
		Teachers in New Jersey will no longer be required to pass a basic reading, writing, and mathematics test to be eligible for public schools according to a new law.
		Act 1669, which was signed into law by Governor Phil Murphy in June, went into effect on Wednesday at the start of the new year.
		The law aims to tackle teacher shortages in the state by removing what New Jersey Education Association, a teachers union, called a barrier to certification in 2023. The law states that the State Board of Education shall not require a candidate seeking a certificate of eligibility.
		A certificate of eligibility with advanced standing, a provisional certificate, or a standard instructional certificate to complete a Commissioner of Education-approved test of basic reading, writing, and mathematics skills, including but not limited to the Praxis Core Academic Skills for Educators test, in order to obtain a certificate of eligibility, a certificate of eligibility with advanced standing, or any of the other types of certificates.
		We need more teachers, and this is the best way to get them, said State Senator Jim Beach.
		Argued when the bill was passed.
		Teachers may still be required to pass specialized tests regarding their fields.
		They will also require a minimum GPA and credits regarding their field as well as a bachelor's degree.
		But give it a few years.
		But give it a few years.
		That'll be seen as discriminatory and a barrier as well.
		The thing is, some barriers are good.
		Some barriers are necessary and put in place for a reason.
		I think there should be a barrier of basic competence to be a teacher teaching our young people, but state of New Jersey disagrees, as does the state of California and Oregon as well.
		Because remember, it's not just diminishing the requirements it takes to become a teacher.
		In tandem, they're diminishing the requirements that teachers fulfill as teachers.
		So, you know, students don't have to pass tests anymore.
		They'll be given...
		A diploma regardless of their ability to read or write or do math.
		And then they'll be able to become teachers despite an inability to read or write or do math.
		It's just part and parcel with our civilizational race towards the bottom and diversity ad nauseum.
		Incredible.
		There's also this story.
		Which I haven't heard too much about, but somebody mentioned it to me yesterday.
		Trump is apparently holding a Washington rally the day before Inauguration Day.
		I guess the question is, uh, why?
		Why, though?
		Most new presidents have their party after they're inaugurated.
		President-elect Donald Trump will hold a victory rally the day before he's sworn in with potentially up to 20,000 close friends.
		The rally was announced for January 19th, the day before Inauguration Day, at Capital One Arena in Washington.
		According to the sign-up sheet, the event will be a victory rally you'll never forget.
		Why, though?
		But why?
		Like, I seriously don't get...
		Why you do that?
		I just have a bad feeling about this.
		It really just reminds me of January 6th.
		Like, why?
		Why?
		Why?
		I really don't understand.
		You're going to have the inauguration on the 20th.
		That's the victory rally.
		That's when you're actually sworn into the presidency.
		Why provide a vector of attack for the assassins that we know are trying to kill Trump?
		For a false flag attack of some sort against Trump supporters?
		Why?
		Have this victory rally, especially when, you know, if you are interested in going to the inauguration, you probably know there's no room available in D.C. As soon as Trump won, basically every hotel room in the city got snatched up by, you know, Republican donors.
		And you're talking about like $2,000 a night to stay in D.C. So who is going to come to this rally?
		Who can afford to come to this rally?
		Where are they going to stay when they come to this rally?
		Just why?
		I genuinely don't understand what the purpose of this is.
		He'll be inaugurated on Monday.
		Why hold a victory rally on Sunday?
		What is the thinking behind this?
		I don't get it.
		I really don't.
		He's holding it at the Capital One Arena.
		In Washington, D.C. And I don't know, man.
	I don't know.
	Maybe people are going to go to this.
	I wouldn't go.
	Personally, I wouldn't go.
	I just have a bad feeling about that.
	I don't get why he would want to do this.
	And why they're saying, like, this rally will go down in history.
	It's like, why?
	But why, though?
unidentified		I don't know.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Maybe one of my callers can tell me.
		But that just makes no sense to me.
		Seems utterly ill-advised, if you want my opinion.
		And again, it just reminds me of nothing more than the catastrophe on January 6th.
		Like, okay.
		I don't get it.
		I don't understand.
		And with January 6th, it seems like it was all a setup from the beginning.
		And it seems like Secret Service was sort of in on it from the jump.
		Remember, Secret Service tried to get Alex Jones to lead the march to the Capitol.
		They were trying to frame Alex Jones for what they knew was going to happen at the Capitol because they started the fight.
		And it seemed to me like it was somebody in Trump's team that gave him this idea.
		Like, yeah, let's hold this rally on the 6th.
		Let's do that.
		Isn't that a good idea, Trump?
		And he's just like, yeah, sure, let's do that.
		I'll tweet it out.
		Give me the form.
		I'll personalize it up and then send it out.
		And I get the feeling something similar happened here.
		It's like, hey, you know, all these people are going to be in D.C. Let's hold a rally on the 19th, you know, just to give them something to do.
		It's like, no.
		My answer would be no.
		My answer would be no, we're doing too much already.
		We'll just do the 20th.
		That's the inauguration.
		That'll be a gigantic celebration.
		Why do something the day before in which any number of things could go wrong?
		I don't get it.
		I don't get it.
		Especially when you know how much they've lied about January 6th ever since then, what they're able to pull off, despite everybody seeing it on live TV, everybody seeing exactly what happened with, you know, grandmas wandering through the Capitol, and then that got turned into the most dangerous and horrifying day since 9-11.
		Totally absurd.
		And they're still lying about this in a way that is, like, hard to even comprehend.
		Merrick Garland yesterday put out a press release claiming that five officers died in the line of duty on January 6th.
		A complete lie.
		A complete and utter falsehood.
		No officers died on January 6th.
		None.
		Zero.
		But Merrick Garland puts out an official release from the Office of the Attorney General.
		Saying five officers lost their lives in the line of duty as a result of what happened to them on January 6th, 2021. Just a complete and outrageous lie.
		The only people that died on January 6th were Trump supporters that were either shot to death at point-blank range, beaten to death, trampled, or had heart attacks as a result of...
		Flashbangs being fired into entirely peaceful crowds.
		And then Merrick Garland, three years later, puts out a report saying five officers died in the line of duty.
		Just a total lie.
		A total lie.
		It's this type of stuff that, like, it's kind of demoralizing.
		It's like, wow, they can just get away with this?
		They just keep saying this over and over.
		It's not true.
		It's just not true.
		And they're...
		They're careful about how they word it, but even how they word it is just not true.
		The Senate Judiciary Committee, the official account, government account of the Senate Judiciary Committee, put out this tweet yesterday.
		Officer Brian Sicknick, Officer Howard Liebingood, Officer Jeff Smith, Officer Gunther Hashida, Officer Kyle DeFratag, five officers lost their lives because of January 6, 2021. Approximately 140 officers were injured.
		We're forever indebted.
		They lost their lives because of January 6th, 2021. They didn't die on January 6th.
		They didn't die as a result of anything that happened to them on January 6th.
		They just died after January 6th, and now their deaths are being used to commit blood libel against Trump supporters, claiming that they killed people that didn't die until days or weeks after.
		Not because of injuries they received on January 6th.
		Just by suicide or some other event.
		It's just completely mad how false all this is.
		It's just blatant blood libel against Trump supporters.
		Claiming that we killed people when we were the ones that were killed.
	It's just crazy.
	Chuck Schumer is very mad at the idea that Trump's going to pardon the January Sixers.
	They, of course, celebrated the political persecution they've been embarked on for the last several years.
	Here's what Chuck Schumer said.
	It's utterly shameful that the president-elect is considering pardons for January Six rioters.
	pardoning criminals who waved Confederate flags, donned Nazi symbols, assaulted police officers, and tried to halt the democratic process would be a dangerous endorsement of political violence.
	It's wrong, it's reckless, and it would be an insult to the memory of those who died in connection to that day.
	Don't you love how effectively they lie?
	you These five officers who died in connection to things that came about because of the events of January 6, 2021. Totally outrageous.
	Of course, the only legitimate violation of the law that he even puts in there is assaulted police officers, which only happened in self-defense, by the way.
	Only happened after the police started assaulting the protesters.
	And the protesters fought back.
	Don't even think that's illegal, but just on the face of it, sure, assaulting police officers are illegal.
	Is it illegal to wave the Confederate flag?
	Is it illegal to wave a symbol of American history?
	Is it illegal to, and by the way, I never saw any swastikas or Nazi symbols anywhere on January 6th, but apparently Chuck Schumer imagined them.
	Of course, he also lied about it.
	He lied about being in the Capitol and some group of people going, there's the big Jew or something.
	Search Chuck Schumer big Jew.
	See what comes up.
	So I guess in his fevered imagination, his demented delusion about what happened that day, he saw Nazis everywhere.
	Here's the thing.
	We have what's called free speech in this country.
	And these things aren't illegal.
	It's like, well, he's walking down the street.
	Nothing illegal about that.
	He was walking down the street with a symbol that Chuck Schumer doesn't like.
	Well, arrest him.
	And if you pardon him, you are approving of political violence.
	One saw me and said, there's the big Jew.
	Recollections of January 6th.
	Imaginations of January 6th.
	Delusional fabrications of January 6th from the fevered minds of Chuck Schumer.
	Who thinks you should go to jail because of the things that he very imaginatively came up with following January 6th.
	Over 1,500 people have been charged over January 6th, the DOJ said on their fourth anniversary.
	More than 1,500 people charged and approximately 1,009 have pled guilty to charges related to the events of January 6th, 2021, the Department of Justice said.
	Just look at those numbers.
	1,500 people charged.
	And a thousand of them pled guilty to the charges.
	Meaning that a thousand of them were faced with either plead guilty or we're going to rig the trial against you and send you to the jail for decades.
	So, you want to plead guilty, don't you?
	Which means this wasn't the actions of the Justice Department seeking justice.
	Otherwise, you would have had people plead not guilty and go to court and have these trials.
	Instead, they rigged it by imposing terrorism charges.
	And saying, look, you can either plead guilty to trespassing or committing violence, but if you plead not guilty, then we're going to hit you with terrorism charges and enhance those sentences, and you'll go to jail for the rest of your life in the next 30, 40 years.
	So, totally illegitimate persecution of these people.
	And again, they lie about officers being killed when no officers were killed.
	Instead, the officers killed peaceful Trump supporters who were unarmed.
	And not posing any threat.
	Just to remind you of where we are in this country.
	Completely, utterly insane.
	Let's go to your calls now.
	Andre in Canada called in about Trudeau resigning.
	Go ahead, Andre, you're on the air.
unidentified		Hello, good morning.
unidentified		How are you, Harrison?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Good morning, doing well, thank you.
unidentified		Yeah, you know, what a world we're living in.
		My goodness.
		You know, like, there was a time as a Canadian that we would be paying attention to American politics, and we would all feel grounded knowing that, thank God, we're not as crazy as you guys.
		In reality, right.
		It's like, you know what, like, what a shock it is when you realize, my God, we've all been washed here in Canada.
		We're led to believe that yesterday's event...
		It was monumentous.
		It was worth celebrating.
		It was a total sham.
		It's like pulling wool over your eyes.
		Nothing's changed.
		What we have, and clearly, like everyone needs to really understand this, we have a leader who's in power, who's not affiliated to any political party.
		He's a dictator.
		And no one is talking about that, except Rebel News.
		Rebel News is going to be exposing this.
		Like, Trudeau is in power as Prime Minister.
		He hasn't resigned.
		He's resigned as the leader of that Liberal Party.
		And he's allowing probably three months for them to get their act together until they find a new leader.
		But as for Canada?
		Think about it.
		He's in power without any party affiliation.
		Like, Castro.
		Like, this is a great example of what's happening with this idea of MKUltra.
		People were celebrating yesterday.
		They have no idea what he's done.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, it reminds me of what happened with Biden.
		It's not like this is going to go to a democratic process.
		They're going to choose a successor for you and appoint a successor without any public input at all.
unidentified		You know, about yesterday, what a sham.
		Like, every American should be full of rage.
		What he's done with that idea, what that medal represents.
		Like, he just insulted every American by giving George Soros, Hillary Clinton, all these medals.
		He devalued what you guys stand for.
		And no one is talking about that.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		100%.
		These people weren't just...
		Rewarded for destroying America.
		They're being rewarded for destroying the Western world as a whole.
		I've got two stories that go right along with what you're saying.
		First, just on that note of the Medal of Freedom going to the likes of George Soros.
		People have uncovered this article from georgesoros.com all the way back in 2015. So
		again, this just points to the fact that when...
		Europe was deciding to dissolve its borders and become a colony of Syria and Turkey.
		George Soros and his immense institutional power was at the center of all of this.
		He says that the origin of the current crisis in Syria, the fate of the Syrian population, has to be the first priority.
		The fate of the Syrian population has to be the first priority.
		The current crisis in Syria that we, of course, started.
		So you start the crisis.
		You dislocate and destroy the nation of all these people, and then you say, well, but now we need to open the borders because they have to be our number one concern, even though the only reason they're migrants in the first place is because we created ISIS and set their country ablaze with civil war.
		So he's not just being rewarded for destroying America.
		He's being rewarded for a lifetime of service in utterly destroying every aspect of the Western world systematically.
unidentified		Everyone's gobbling this up.
		Everyone is understanding this, just like how you are clearly understanding part of history.
		But going forward, that medal used to have some form of substance that people, like the general mass, should be looking forward to achieving some goal that is monumental.
		And then eventually you might get a medal.
		Biden has devalued everything about that.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, well, and like I said, it's not, you know...
		At this point, it's not that putting this medal on somebody elevates the person.
		It just denigrates and destroys the value of the medal itself.
		So, yeah, Bono.
		If you're a Hollywood moron, there's Biden receiving it.
		Yeah, it would be nice to be in a country where these things actually meant something.
		Instead, it's just a prize for one pedophile to give to another.
		Incredible stuff.
		And then on your note about Trudeau, Infowars has the article, Trudeau's potential replacements would continue his same anti-life, anti-family agenda.
		As news of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's resignation circulates across news outlets and social media, many stalwart liberals are suggesting replacements for their disgraced leader.
		And he goes through the list of potential successors for Justin Trudeau.
		And every single one of them is just as bad as he is, more or less.
		So, you know, again, I'm reminded of almost like, you know, what happened with the presidents of Harvard and the like there, where it's like conservatives got the president of Harvard kicked out in a blow to DEI.
		And then it's like whoever replaces them is just as if not more committed to the DEI program.
		They just also like Israel because that's what it was really about.
		Thank you for the call, Andre.
		Let's get a few more calls in before the end of the show.
		Drew in New Jersey wants to talk about DEI teachers.
		Well, your state just got rid of one of the...
		One of the barriers restricting people for coming teachers in that they used to have to be able to read and write and do math, but not anymore.
		So you're going to have a plethora of teachers, Drew.
		Aren't you so happy about that?
andrew in new jersey ▲ ● ▼		Good info about Dennis Prager, PragerU.
		But one thing I love that's appropriate that Dennis always says is that everything the left touches, it destroys.
		So that's what I thought with the teachers.
		So now they're...
		They're harming, it's a DEI thing, so now they're lowering the standards, harming the students, the very students they think that they're helping, and also they're bad role models because now the students know they don't have to try as hard, yet there'll be then racist laws against Asians and whites in college applications for jobs.
		So they're harming them every which way instead of trying to help the problem.
		And I just want to say, too, with the Presidential Freedom Awards, it was InfoWars that broke the George Soros video that was forgotten or hidden for a long time.
		Several years back, you guys played that.
		And then Anderson Cooper said Alex Jones is fake news.
		That interview never happened, but now everyone knows it happened.
		And speaking of dumbing things down...
		The opposite.
		I love Denzel Washington.
		He talks about having the fathers in the homes.
		But I just, when I watch him getting the award, I keep thinking the irony of a black man receiving an award from Joe Biden, who was, speaking of schools, a segregationist.
		He said he didn't want his kids to go to a racial jungle school and what they can't learn unless they're sitting next to my white kids.
		And then President Obama, when he came on the scene, Biden said he was the first ever clean and articulate black.
		You know, so just like the irony of him giving awards out to black people with his history of slander and racism.
		But keep playing those videos because you guys are always proven right in the end.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, it is one of the most amazing videos ever, that interview with George Soros, where he's given an opportunity to...
		You know, bemoan how painful and, you know, horrible it was to be forced to be a Nazi collaborator.
		And instead, he's just like, no, it was great.
		It was like the best time of my life.
		I loved it.
		No, it was awesome, actually.
		Of course, you just, you can't help but think about...
unidentified		Well.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Anyway.
		We'll end the show now.
		Before I say something inconsiderate, I do want to remind you to go to drjonesnaturals.com.
		That's drjonesnaturals.com.
		Two of our best-selling and most popular products ever are back in stock and on sale to the celebration of employers everywhere who have missed these products.
		It's Vitamin Mineral Fusion and Turbo Force Plus.
		Get both of these in a combo pack for 30% off at drjonesnaturals.com.
		Try them now.
		You will not be disappointed, folks.
		and stay tuned to Dallas Jones in 90 seconds.
unidentified		While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
unidentified		Infowars.com forward slash show.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		I've got some good news for all the Infowars fans out there and supporters that have been upset that Vitamin Mineral Fusion, our best-selling product, has not been available for a few months.
		It is now back in stock, the original.
		Exclusively available at drjonesnaturals.com My dad's great supplement company based right here in Austin, Texas.
		He developed it and now it is exclusively available at drjonesnaturals.com It has all the highest quality vitamins and minerals and a whole bunch of other superfoods and herbs concentrated in it.
		It tastes great.
		It gets maximum absorption because you put it in water as a fruit punch in a liquid form so it absorbs better in the stomach and the intestines.
		Ladies and gentlemen, it has all the essential vitamins and minerals, a whole bunch of other concentrates of super herbs.
		That boosts your immune system, mental clarity, focus, your energy.
		I love vitamin, mineral fusion, and it keeps our broadcast on the air.
		A true 360 win.
		When this product first came out five years ago, I didn't really push it.
		Okay, it's a vitamin, mineral, amino acid, fusion, great.
		It's just a staple product.
		And then it became more and more popular until it became our number one.
		Best-selling product just because the listeners and viewers love it so much.
		Now, I know a lot of you that love it are already going to reorder it, but for folks who have never tried it, try it.
		It's amazing, it's good for you, and it keeps the broadcast on the air.
		Our great sponsor is drjonesnackles.com.
		There's so many other incredible products there like CoQ10, the highest quality.
		Quercetin.
		This is high-end quality at very low prices.
		You get it for 50% off together right now or 40% off individually.
		Next Level Foundational Energy is not a stimulant, but feels like one.
		It cleans out your cells.
		There's the fluoride-free toothpaste.
		It's all there at drjokesnaturals.com.

▲