Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
What's going on here is that the food industry has figured out that there's a combination of sweet, carbohydrate and salt that goes to our brains and is very... | |
I think it's addictive. | ||
Now, that's my opinion. | ||
And I think it's the same neural circuits that are involved in opioid addiction and other kinds of addiction that we have. | ||
The food is probably addictive. | ||
That man that you just heard speak is a man named Dr. Califf. | ||
He's the current chief of the FDA appointed by Biden in 2021. So the Food and Drug Administrator admitted that our food isn't actually food, it's more like drugs. | ||
Him and his buddy here said some other wild stuff at this Senate health panel hearing on December 5th. | ||
One of the key things that they brought up was food dyes, which is the subject of today's video. | ||
A not often discussed reason as to why our American food system is just so addictive in nature is because of how colorful it is. | ||
Check this out. | ||
A 1982 study found that people perceive dark red beverages as tasting sweeter even when that sample and all of the other samples that they tried in the study had the same exact amount of sugar in it. | ||
Certain colors, like the one in that study, dark red, can literally change how we perceive our sense of taste. | ||
Red 40 alone is found in over 36,000 American food products. | ||
And in some places, you honestly wouldn't expect, like this ham and cheese cup at the grocery store, or this salmon salad, or this jar of ginger. | ||
The fact that Red 40 is in 36,000 American food products would be a-okay if Red 40 wasn't studied to cause ADHD in children, irritable bowel disease, and possibly cancer, amongst many other negative health effects. | ||
Don't take the black pill just yet. | ||
Our benevolent, loving, angelic overlords have been monitoring Red 40 day and night for our own safety. | ||
unidentified
|
The FDA has a position that food coloring like 40 are safe for a kid's ingestion. | |
Do both of you stand behind that? | ||
We have not evaluated Red 40 in over a decade. | ||
In over a decade. | ||
In over a decade. | ||
What would you say? | ||
You do hear. | ||
To make matters worse, the equally harmful Red Dye 3 was also brought up during this hearing and this is what our benevolent angelic overlords had to say about that. | ||
unidentified
|
Red 3 has been known to cause cancer in cosmetics, but we still allow it to be put in our food. | |
I don't understand that. | ||
So, RED3 presents an interesting example for us. | ||
It is actually known to be cancer in laboratory animals, rats. | ||
But the scientific consensus is that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in rats is not applicable in humans. | ||
However, any chemical that is shown to be carcinogenic in animals or humans, or should I say humans or animals, cannot be authorized by FDA. | ||
It's called the Delaney Clause. | ||
And so even though we don't believe there is a risk to humans under the Delaney Clause of the FFDCA, red dye, because it is known to cause cancer in laboratory animals, should not be authorized. | ||
And so that is what has been challenged FDA for many years, is how to manage around the Delaney clause. | ||
So what he just said there was completely insane, and I'm going to help you understand some of the wizard talk that you just heard there. | ||
The FDA doesn't authorize anything in our food supply if it's found to cause cancer in humans or animals. | ||
This is due to the regulation he talked about called the Delaney Clause, which was first enacted in 1958. So what's so puzzling about what he just said in front of the Senate is that red dye number three was found to cause cancer in rats in the year 1990. So when they found that out, they banned it. | ||
But only for cosmetics, not the food supply. | ||
They only followed the Delaney clause halfway. | ||
They should have banned it in everything if it causes cancer in rats because that's what the Delaney clause says. | ||
So it should be a huge slap in your face when you hear this guy admit right in front of the Senate That it's a challenge to the FDA to manage around the Delaney Clause when the Delaney Clause is one of the few things that keeps us safe from cancer-causing chemicals. | ||
These people hate you. | ||
But here's the good news. | ||
Because of massive public backlash, they're actually looking at banning these food dyes now. | ||
Which is a huge victory. | ||
Soon, man-made horrors beyond your comprehension, like this Captain Crunch Blue Ocean syrup abomination, may soon just vanish from the grocery shelves. | ||
But banning a few harmful ingredients and products isn't going to take you across the finish line in your own health journey. | ||
That's just a fact. | ||
You still have to exercise your free will and make better choices. | ||
A good rule of thumb that I personally follow is to just stay away from pasta. | ||
unidentified
|
It's Friday, December 20th in the year of our Lord 2024. And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
I think it's time to blow this thing. | ||
Get everybody and the stuff together. | ||
Okay, three, two, one. | ||
Let's jam. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from Austin, Texas, this Friday morning. | ||
Hope everybody's doing well. | ||
We've got a lot of stuff to talk about. | ||
I've got a lot of videos to show you today. | ||
We'll be taking your calls throughout the show as well. | ||
I know we'll be joined by Alex Cargill, right? | ||
Do we have any other guests today? | ||
Oh, that's on Monday. | ||
That's happening. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
All right, so just your phone calls today and a lot of videos and a lot of news stories to talk about. | ||
So let's just get right into it. | ||
it here it is your daily dispatch all right here it is folks Your Daily Dispatch for Friday, the 20th of December, 2024. Nick Fuentes says, armed man came to home, man shot by police. | ||
That's the way it's being reported by USA Today. | ||
A more accurate headline would be something like, shock assassination attempt ends in death of potential killer. | ||
A man killed his family members. | ||
He killed three people in his family. | ||
Drove two and a half hours to Nick Fuentes' house. | ||
Parked outside. | ||
Went up. | ||
Rang his doorbell. | ||
Holding a gun with a rifle and a crossbow. | ||
And a pistol in his hand. | ||
Rang the doorbell. | ||
Shouted up Nick's name. | ||
Nick apparently was streaming at the time. | ||
The cops were called. | ||
Shed up about ten minutes later. | ||
The guy tried to run. | ||
Ran into a neighbor's house. | ||
Like broke into one of Nick's neighbor's houses. | ||
Killed two dogs there. | ||
Tried to flee the cops. | ||
Shot at the cops. | ||
The cops returned fire. | ||
That man is now dead. | ||
We'll get back to that story in just a little bit. | ||
But absolutely horrifying. | ||
And almost an inevitable escalation of violence from the left. | ||
And again, we'll talk about this in just a second, but absolutely horrifying. | ||
Our prayers for Nick Fuentes. | ||
He's been dealing with a lot of issues recently with people doxing his address and showing up and thinking they have a right to hurt or kill him because he disagrees with them politically. | ||
And that's horrifying. | ||
And if you search this online, it's like only a few stories about it, and every one of them is Nick Fuentes, notable white supremacist, claims that a man tried to kill him. | ||
There's no claims here. | ||
The man showed up at his house after having already killed three people, shouted Nick's name, deliberately came to his house, drove two and a half hours to get there, and died in a hail of gunfire when cops returned fire at him as he ran away. | ||
There's nothing speculative about this and it is utterly dishonest and irresponsible of the media to downplay what happened because in a way they are you know actually contributing to this trend and it is a trend and we'll get back to that in just a second moving on but of course prayers for Nick and he's gonna have to make a lot of changes so troubling very troubling stuff Meanwhile, | ||
Wall Street Journal reports senior officials observed Biden mental health decline in first few months of term, saying he had good days and bad days. | ||
Yes, a new report in the Wall Street Journal explains that Joe Biden's White House... | ||
How Joe Biden's White House functioned despite the 82-year-old outgoing president's noticeable declining mental faculties. | ||
And basically they say that he was brain dead from the beginning and has never actually been in charge of the White House. | ||
We have been under the... | ||
Administration of nameless, faceless, anonymous bureaucrats for the last four years, which might explain why everything sucks now. | ||
At least it's one explanation of how the White House functioned with a diminished Joe Biden in charge. | ||
Yeah, AIDS kept meeting short and controlled access. | ||
Top advisors acted. | ||
I mean, all right, we'll have to get back into that, too. | ||
It's an insane story. | ||
They're acknowledging now that for the last four years, we have had a literal puppet, a non-functioning skin suit just laying around in the Oval Office while a bunch of anonymous functionaries do the job of running the country without any oversight or You know, responsibility to the voters of this country. | ||
It's a shadow dictatorship that's terrifying. | ||
Meanwhile, Pentagon says it doubled the number of troops in Syria months ago. | ||
The United States has more than doubled the number of its forces in Syria to fight the Islamic State. | ||
Yeah, right. | ||
That one got me. | ||
I wasn't expecting that. | ||
The United States has more than doubled the number of forces in Syria to fight the Islamic State. | ||
Yeah, right. | ||
Wow. | ||
That's some good comedy from AP News. | ||
A dramatic increase in the Pentagon revealed Thursday acknowledging that the added troops have been there for months or even more than a year. | ||
Yeah, because they were overthrowing Assad to benefit Israel. | ||
Or, as AP reports it, to fight the Islamic State. | ||
Oh boy. | ||
I'm telling you, I wasn't ready for that one. | ||
That one hit me. | ||
Meanwhile, ABC News. | ||
Protective order issued for a man plotting attack with Madison School Shooter. | ||
The FBI says this man, Alexander Charles Panfendorf, We're good to go. | ||
Carlsbad, oh, against a Carlsbad, California man who authorities allege was communicating with the abundant life Christian school shooting suspect. | ||
And of course, if you want to know more about this, you've got to check out our interview yesterday with BX. And finally, we have the shutdown, the continuing resolution, the nonsense. | ||
The Hill has the story. | ||
What's in Congress's 1,500-page government funding deal to avert shutdown? | ||
Congress on Tuesday rolled out its last major funding deal of the year and is expected to move quickly. | ||
Well, this is an old story. | ||
What the heck is this? | ||
This is an old story. | ||
I put the old story in there by accident. | ||
Essentially what's happened is they downsized the plan significantly. | ||
It went from the 1,500-page bloated disaster to a more reasonable and typical 85-page bill like the one that was passed in September. | ||
What is it? | ||
I put a bunch of articles in today about this, and they're all from the 18th. | ||
Why are they all from two days ago? | ||
This is very weird. | ||
These are all on the front page of Google News. | ||
So I've been following this, but I've been mostly just like watching videos and looking at commentary on X. And so I just searched, you know, spending bill and found the most recent articles on Google News, but they're all from two days ago, so I don't understand. | ||
I don't understand what's happening. | ||
But essentially, the 1,500-page bill got finished, and in fact, you know what I'll do? | ||
Much of my understanding of this comes from my co-worker, Owen Troyer. | ||
He put out a five-minute video on this yesterday, so maybe we'll just play that and go to it. | ||
But if you want to bring in some actually up-to-date articles, that kind of annoys me. | ||
It's my fault. | ||
I put in the links in the description. | ||
Show rundown today, but I didn't realize they're all from two days ago, so that's my fault. | ||
But I want to get you the actual status of where it's at right now, so we'll bring you an update there. | ||
But essentially, they downsized this massive bill into a more reasonable one, but I believe that still is having trouble making it through, and the government shutdown is a possibility. | ||
I... I gotta admit, I'm a little bit torn about this. | ||
I just put the video in, guys, why you should be happy the bill didn't pass tonight. | ||
Let's just go to this. | ||
This is Owen Schroer published this last night, apparently while playing some b-ball. | ||
So here's Owen Schroer on the bill and its current status. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Let me explain why this bill not passing tonight is a good thing. | ||
And I know a lot of people are upset. | ||
Trump endorsed the bill. | ||
We want the Republican Party behind Trump. | ||
But believe me, this bill failing tonight is a good thing for multiple reasons. | ||
And before you want to attack some of the Republicans in the House for not supporting this bill, for other things they've done, fair enough. | ||
Let's actually look at the bill and let's look at who voted against it. | ||
This bill, as far as the spending is concerned, was virtually the same bill that everybody was against just 24 hours ago. | ||
It's virtually the same bill. | ||
They got rid of the protection for the January 6th committee criminals. | ||
They got rid of the global pandemic tyranny. | ||
They got rid of the Global Engagement Center for Censorship and some of the other agenda items in there that were obviously bad. | ||
But as far as the spending is concerned, it's still a ridiculous bill. | ||
It's virtually the exact same bill, maybe even worse, as far as the spending is concerned. | ||
So there's nothing conservative about this bill. | ||
Let's just understand that. | ||
And as far as the Republicans that voted against it, Really, these are the only true Republicans that are conservative. | ||
There are barely any conservatives left in Congress. | ||
There are barely any conservatives left in the Republican Party. | ||
So if you're a true conservative, a fiscal conservative, then you shouldn't support this bill, like Thomas Massey refused to support this bill. | ||
But let's put that aside and look at the larger political picture. | ||
This bill, refusing tonight, the Republicans voting against it, Shows that Mike Johnson can no longer be Speaker of the House. | ||
He's toast. | ||
The first bill was so bad, he couldn't even bring it to the floor. | ||
And now this bill was so bad, he couldn't even get the Republican Party to vote for it. | ||
So Mike Johnson is now officially toast as Speaker. | ||
That is a good thing. | ||
Now here is what's going to happen next. | ||
My guess is the Republicans or Mike Johnson, somebody's going to say, let's bring one or two, maybe three bills to the floor, one pagers, one for hurricane disaster relief, one for farm funding, and then there's maybe another item that they want to get out there. | ||
But those two items... | ||
He basically goes into predictions here saying that they're going to have to fund each of these things individually. | ||
So that's your update. | ||
Basically, House Speaker Mike Johnson said members are expected to vote this morning on legislation to keep the government funded temporarily. | ||
They have until midnight tonight, if I understand correctly, 12.01 a.m. | ||
Saturday. | ||
That would be the first minute of Saturday, midnight tonight. | ||
The House last night rejected a short-term spending bill after Republican leaders scrapped an earlier bipartisan deal and made major changes to appease President-elect Donald Trump, billionaire Elon Musk, and restless rank-and-file GOP lawmakers and their constituents, you might add. | ||
You might add there was a massive popular public support for this, which is why it ended up happening. | ||
Elon Musk can say whatever he wants if it doesn't resonate with the people and doesn't actually pose a threat to the politicians and their continuing representation. | ||
So it wouldn't matter, but the fact is the people were outraged by what was in the bill and Elon Musk simply publicized it. | ||
House Republicans have not said what their next move is. | ||
For now, they're seeking to cast blame on Democrats if Congress misses the midnight deadline to get legislation to President Joe Biden's desk. | ||
If there is a shutdown, it would have wide-ranging effects, in addition to hundreds of thousands of federal workers being furloughed. | ||
The Transportation Security Administration is warning that a funding lapse would lead to longer lines at airports. | ||
This holiday season, which means that they are blackmailing you. | ||
It means that if you don't want them to purposefully cause massive inconvenience to you and your family, then you have to give them the money that they want. | ||
That in the legal world is called extortion, but in the world of Washington, D.C., it's business as usual. | ||
In a way, I agree with Owen, but I also kind of disagree a little bit, I have to admit. | ||
After all, the fact that the original bipartisan bill was stopped in its tracks by the intervention of Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and crowds of regular Republicans speaking out against it, calling their congressmen, telling them we don't want the January 6th committee being given carte blanche and basically protected from legislation or protected from being investigated, the censorship, the pandemic. | ||
Preparedness aspects. | ||
Like, those were the things that I objected to. | ||
If those were removed, I gotta admit, I don't really see what the big deal is. | ||
I gotta admit, and maybe this is something we'll take calls on, but like, I don't know. | ||
Maybe I'm the only one. | ||
I'm not... | ||
I'm not really all that concerned about government spending as such. | ||
I'm concerned about what they're spending the money on. | ||
I mean, the Federal Reserve principle, I mean the whole system is utterly corrupt and broken and fraudulent and fiat. | ||
So, why shouldn't we fund ourselves? | ||
Why shouldn't we just pass the hurricane relief? | ||
And just keep the government going and just hit the ground running when Trump gets into office. | ||
Why go through this again? | ||
And again, I usually, frankly, defer to Owen on this stuff because he spends a lot more time studying the intricacies of this big, complicated board game we call the United States government. | ||
I don't have any patience for the parliamentary tricks that get pulled. | ||
It all just is utter nonsense to me. | ||
I mean, I get it, but I just hate it, so I just don't pay attention that much to it. | ||
So I typically defer to him on stuff like this. | ||
But it just seems to me like... | ||
Stopping the 1500 page bill is a victory. | ||
And getting them to pare it down to where it's just the bare minimum, same thing that was passed in September. | ||
And they passed that in September without, you know, a lot of outcry and anger. | ||
So if they remove the January 6th committee protection, if they remove the censorship programs, if they remove the, you know, pandemic preparedness stuff, well, these are the things that we were objecting to. | ||
If those got removed, Then we won the negotiations, and the deal should go through. | ||
Seems to me like harping on fiscal responsibility at this point is kind of just a losing game to play. | ||
Maybe that's just me, but again, it's like We can spend the same amount of money. | ||
I don't really have... | ||
It's not like I see... | ||
You see the amount of money government spends and it's jaw-dropping and astonishing and totally unnecessary. | ||
But hear me out here. | ||
If instead of spending the money the way that we do, we spent it to actually benefit America... | ||
Would it still be an issue if instead of spending $200 billion to start World War III with Russia and Ukraine, we were using all of that money to secure the southern border and oust the immigrants? | ||
I mean, it's the same amount of money. | ||
Are you going to object to that? | ||
It's what we need to do. | ||
It has to happen for our country to continue to function. | ||
So it's not that the money being spent to me is... | ||
The big issue, it's a big issue, but if that same money was spent to build high schools or repair roads in America or protect our southern border or supercharge law enforcement a la El Salvador and lock up all of the criminals that are making our lives miserable or open up institutions to house the criminal hobo zombies that are That I constantly see just arguing with themselves in what were formerly | ||
nice neighborhoods here in the middle of Texas. | ||
If that money was spent to actually help the people, I really don't have an issue with it. | ||
But maybe that's just me. | ||
I just feel like libertarianism is like a trick sometimes. | ||
Theoretically, it's wonderful. | ||
It's absolutely correct. | ||
In a country of upright, moral, responsible Christian people, it's the ideal. | ||
It's perfect. | ||
It's exactly what has to happen. | ||
But this is not the world that we live in right now. | ||
And it feels like we're constantly stuck in this game where leftists are constantly increasing the government and using the government to fund and progress their ideas and to dominate and have their worldview be the ultimate and universal one. | ||
And then we're over here just trying to stop them from doing that. | ||
It's like, what if we just did that? | ||
What if just instead of funding DEI programs all over the country, we just funded worker training programs? | ||
And we got people really good, high-paying, blue-collar jobs so they didn't have to go into debt, going to college to learn a skill that nobody wants to pay them for. | ||
What if we just did it right? | ||
Here's how Congress is supposed to fund the U.S. government but never does. | ||
That's the thing. | ||
It's like, at a certain point, I don't know. | ||
I just can't really be outraged by our debt going from $39 to $44 trillion. | ||
That just doesn't do it for me anymore. | ||
It's just like, are you saying $39 trillion is reasonable? | ||
Are you saying that we're going to bring that down somehow? | ||
I don't see it. | ||
But really, overall, it's like, why not take this victory? | ||
If it was a 1,500-page document that was full of all of this horrible stuff, like allowing the government to just declare a pandemic at their whim and then immediately declare martial law and shut everything down, that's what I didn't like being in the bill. | ||
That's what shouldn't have been funded. | ||
So here's an image of the previous bill, a stack of paper about a foot high, and then the new bill, which is a very reasonable little half-inch stack of paper. | ||
That's victory to me. | ||
I don't know. | ||
So now you're not going to pass that smaller one? | ||
You want to get even smaller? | ||
It's like you got what you wanted. | ||
Now you have to pass it. | ||
Or else next time when there's a 1500 page bill and we all get mad and angry, what are they going to say? | ||
They're going to go, well, we're not going to negotiate with you because last time we gave you what you wanted and then you still didn't pass it. | ||
So we either pass this or shut up. | ||
From a negotiator standpoint, I don't get this. | ||
I really don't get this. | ||
I'll take your calls on that topic. | ||
I imagine a lot of our audience disagrees with me and still thinks that fiscal conservatism has to be the priority. | ||
I just don't care that much. | ||
To be honest with you, to be totally honest. | ||
Now, where the money is being spent, I absolutely care a lot about. | ||
And if we could downsize, I'm absolutely for it. | ||
And I think Owen actually goes on in that video to talk about, you know, let the government shut down. | ||
If we're talking about Doge eliminating 75% of the federal government, like this is almost like a trial run. | ||
But that's not the way that these shutdowns work. | ||
The shutdowns are deliberately designed to cause the most amount of pain to the American people to piss them off. | ||
To blame the Republicans for shutting down the government. | ||
So don't think they won't do it, too. | ||
They'll shut down the government and then they'll just, you know, furlough all of the TSA people. | ||
And so you'll miss your flight, you'll miss your Christmas, or you'll have wasted a ton of money or you'll spend, you know, you're going on vacation for Christmas, you're going to have 72 hours somewhere and you end up spending 12 of those hours sitting in the airport. | ||
Because the security line was too long and you missed your flight and you have to wait for a new one. | ||
It's like the inconvenience that's caused by that is deliberately designed to be painful to the American people. | ||
The actual function of the government will continue unabated, obviously. | ||
The activities overseas of military intervention, none of that's going to stop. | ||
So you're just going to cause a bunch of pain and piss off a bunch of regular people. | ||
And eventually you're going to pass something that more or less looks like the bill that was presented last night. | ||
So why not just pass it? | ||
I don't know. | ||
That's just me. | ||
It's like, as we talked about all yesterday, the fact that this bill didn't go through the first time with 1,500 pages is like a miracle. | ||
With Elon and Trump intervening and the MAGA American populace standing up and demanding it not pass, getting it pared down, getting all of those things removed from it, like that is the victory. | ||
Take the victory. | ||
This is why I don't understand. | ||
They removed all the stuff that you didn't like, but you still don't pass the bill? | ||
And we still have to go through this? | ||
Rigmarole? | ||
This is still going to dominate the news cycle? | ||
That just seems tedious and unstrategic to me, personally. | ||
But I'll take your calls. | ||
We have alternative views. | ||
We'll put out the number nice and early today. | ||
Open line Friday. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
This is the American Journal. | ||
I have a lot of videos to show you. | ||
I'm going to open up the phone lines right now. | ||
I'm going to go to a few videos this segment. | ||
We'll go to your calls as soon as possible. | ||
And you can call about whatever you want. | ||
We'll do open line Fridays. | ||
But, you know, I imagine there are people out there that, I don't know, think I'm stupid for not caring about How much the government spends necessarily, thinking that that's not necessarily my priority. | ||
Give us a call. | ||
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
and we'll take your calls throughout the show today. | ||
I want to start actually with... | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
What happened to Nick Fuentes last night? | ||
And really what's been happening to him over the course of the last few weeks or even few months? | ||
The way USA Today reports it is typical for the mainstream media. | ||
If you search Nick Fuentes' name right now on news sites, Nick Fuentes says armed man came to home, semicolon, man shot by police. | ||
Like, talk about the most banal, just-the-facts-ma'am reporting. | ||
Not even the facts. | ||
First of all, it's framed as if this is a claim by Nick Fuentes that doesn't have evidence, when in reality, there's a police report, there's an official statement from the Chicago police, there's video of the guy doing it, where he deliberately goes directly to Nick Fuentes' house, stands on his porch, rings his doorbell, shouts his name with a loaded gun and a crossbow. | ||
So, they just, they have to frame it dishonestly with the phrase, Nick Fuentes says. | ||
After all, they've already framed Nick Fuentes in the minds of the readers as somebody that shouldn't be trusted. | ||
So, when you say Nick Fuentes says, the signal you're sending is, here's a lie Nick Fuentes is saying, okay? | ||
Nick Fuentes says armed man came to home. | ||
He came to home. | ||
Not he was there to kill Nick Fuentes. | ||
Not a potential assassin tries to kill Nick Fuentes. | ||
It's Nick Fuentes says a guy came to his home. | ||
It's just the way they say this just downplays it so much. | ||
And then... | ||
The way they write, semicolon, man shot by police. | ||
It sounds like you're not even sure if it's the same man. | ||
Are these two different stories? | ||
So Nick Fuentes is complaining about some dude coming to his home, but also a guy was shot by police. | ||
So let's go over what happened to Nick Fuentes, and then we'll really dig into the media's response and the role they play in this, because I think it's extremely important to understand. | ||
Here's what USA Today says. | ||
Far-right influencer Nick Fuentes says armed man came to his door. | ||
Man fatally shot by police. | ||
White nationalist Nick Fuentes says an armed individual approached his house Wednesday night after his Illinois home's address was leaked on the Internet. | ||
Officers responded to a home in Berwyn, Illinois at 11.38 p.m., local. | ||
local time on Wednesday after receiving a report with a male subject with a gun, the Berwyn Police Department said in a news release. | ||
The man, who authorities did not identify, fled on foot and successfully escaped from law enforcement, the release states. | ||
The man then forced entry to a nearby home where he fatally shot the two dogs, police said. | ||
The man's name was John Lyons. | ||
Colin Rugg reported it accurately on X, the only place you can find real news these days, it seems. | ||
The man accused of attempting to murder Nick Fuentes is 24-year-old John Lyons. | ||
Very dangerous times, especially when we have degenerates praising Luigi Mangione for executing a man in the back. | ||
Lyons reportedly traveled 140 miles to Fuentes' home after allegedly murdering three family members. | ||
Fuentes has released footage of the man calling out for him at his home. | ||
Fuentes was reportedly live streaming when the man showed up, an action that may have saved his life. | ||
Officers who were called to the scene spotted Lions, who ran away and forced his way inside someone's home. | ||
When inside, he shot and killed two dogs. | ||
Lions eventually left the home and fired multiple shots at police. | ||
The officers shot and killed him. | ||
26-year-old Sarah Mason, 61-year-old Janice L. Mason, and 23-year-old Caleb M. Mason were killed earlier that day. | ||
This guy had already murdered three people and drove two and a half hours to Nick Fuentes' home, whose address had been leaked online, on X in particular, months before. | ||
He'd already had people showing up at his house, according to him, like crowds of people waiting for him to come out of his home. | ||
He had a woman go up to his home. | ||
And ring the doorbell, possibly try to get in. | ||
He apparently, allegedly, according to the video, pepper sprayed her and pushed her. | ||
She fell down the stairs and is now like suing him. | ||
And he, I think he got arranged yesterday for that or, you know, had to go turn himself in and do a, whatever, check in for it. | ||
I'm not sure what the latest that that is, but this has been an ongoing saga of people doxing his location for the purpose of sending radicals to his house to harass or harm or potentially kill him. | ||
Here's what Nick said on X. | ||
Last night, an armed killer made an attempt on my life at my home, which was recently doxed on this platform. | ||
The gunman carried a pistol, a crossbow, and incendiary devices. | ||
I believe he intended to kill me. | ||
He is now dead. | ||
I'm okay. | ||
According to police, the would-be assassin committed a triple homicide in southern Illinois earlier yesterday. | ||
Before he arrived to my doorstep with his pistol drawn, calling my name, I'm grateful to God that I'm still alive today. | ||
Tragically, the gunman broke into a... | ||
Neighbors home to evade police and kill two of their dogs. | ||
While heartbreaking, it could have been so unimaginably worse. | ||
God have mercy. | ||
Doxing is not a game. | ||
This nihilistic lynch mob behavior must end before anyone else is killed. | ||
I will now have to uproot my life and relocate while I can handle whatever comes to my front door. | ||
It is irresponsible to expect my neighbors with young families to share that burden. | ||
In the meantime, I will have to contract 24-hour security to protect myself and my property. | ||
If anyone would like to contribute to defray the cost, which ends up being about $13,000 a week of private security and rebuilding my studio, he gives a location link. | ||
I can only accept cryptocurrency because I'm banned from banking services and credit card processing. | ||
Because, of course, the attacks on Nick Fuentes didn't just start. | ||
They've been ongoing for years. | ||
similar to InfoWars, but I'd say probably maybe an even greater degree. | ||
And again, this has been going on for a while. | ||
And it was one of the reasons Nick and I were kind of having a spat over Thanksgiving. | ||
And I basically just dropped it. | ||
I just made a joke out of it at the end. | ||
Because people go crazy about Nick. | ||
And it's so funny because the only thing I can relate it to is the way people feel about Jews. | ||
They're very similar. | ||
Where it's like people dedicate their whole lives to hating Nick Fuentes. | ||
They dedicate every hour of the day to hating Nick Fuentes. | ||
And they expect you to go along with that. | ||
Now, I disagreed with the way Nick was talking about this meme called Wife Jack and the way that he was talking about marriage. | ||
I just frankly disagree with. | ||
As we were arguing about that. | ||
But then I had all these people, you know, in my comments or, you know, tag me and stuff and just being like, yeah, Nick Fuentes deserves to die and is a gay fed and should, and it's just like, no, I just disagree with him on this point. | ||
So don't, don't try to drag me into this like obsession that you people have. | ||
And it's, I swear it's an ego thing that people have. | ||
People were even trying to bait me into it, going, you really just gave in after they said those horrible things about your wife and whatever? | ||
And it's like, they don't know my wife. | ||
They don't know what the hell they're talking about. | ||
They can say whatever they want. | ||
It doesn't affect me. | ||
But people take it personally. | ||
The Groypers, Nick's followers, will go after anybody who insults him, and they'll be brutal and vicious. | ||
And then people feel defensive and feel like they have to go after him and feel like they're now on this crusade You know fight against these people and just becomes like an obsession of theirs and it's a you'll never be able to win because the growers don't care they're just gonna you know keep coming at you dozens of them endlessly they're just having fun they're just trolling you and you're falling for the bait so I was never gonna do that that was never gonna happen but also at that same time people were leaking it Footage of livestreamer | ||
Destiny engaged in a sex act that they claimed was potential with Nick Fuentes. | ||
No evidence of this at all. | ||
But part of it was I was getting all these people that just hate Nick vociferously and were trying to rope me into their vendetta against him. | ||
I'm not into that. | ||
I'm not going to go down that path. | ||
So I wanted to reject it outright that way. | ||
But also, it's like, I got nothing against Nick personally. | ||
We're on the same side at the end of the day. | ||
His enemies are my enemies in a lot of cases. | ||
And I felt a little bit like I was doing the work of my enemies. | ||
Like, we're on the battlefield. | ||
And I'm arguing with Nick, and they're over there on the other front lines watching, going, yes, yes, divide and conquer, cause division, separate each other, and we will defeat you one by one. | ||
So, you know, I was just like, why am I doing favors for my enemies? | ||
Why am I doing favors for our enemies, our shared enemies, me and Nick? | ||
So I wasn't going to do that. | ||
But also, it's like, with the Destiny video thing, it's like, okay, there are two options. | ||
Either... | ||
It is Nick Fuentes, which it's not, and I never believed it was. | ||
But if it was, then people are sharing without permission intimate material of his that's like revenge porn. | ||
Like, that's not... | ||
Cool. | ||
That's not okay to do. | ||
So if it is him, you're a bad person for sharing that stuff around. | ||
And if it's not him, then you're just smearing him over a video that has nothing to do with him. | ||
So you lose either way. | ||
It's a losing position either way. | ||
And it was like this was happening. | ||
The woman was coming to his door. | ||
People were doxing him and attacking him. | ||
And I was like, do I really want to pile on? | ||
Does he really need me, a friend of his, going after him when he's got all this other crap going on? | ||
And so it's been increasing. | ||
It's been this trend that's been occurring with Nick Fuentes in particular, but really with everybody. | ||
And this is where the media manipulation comes into all of this. | ||
And also, you know, when Nick, like... | ||
Mace that lady in or whatever he did and kicked her down the stairs or whatever. | ||
Like when that happened, I was like, hell yeah, good. | ||
Good. | ||
That's what needs to happen. | ||
Because treating these people politely is only going to encourage them. | ||
If you have leftists, activists, feeling... | ||
Like they're able to just show up at the homes of right-wing activists who haven't done anything wrong. | ||
Maybe they've said things they disagree with, but that's their right as Americans. | ||
And if these leftists feel like they have a right to come bother you and harass you at your home and you're not allowed to do anything about it, you have to sit there and take it, that's a terrible precedent to set. | ||
The precedent that needs to be set is if you come to my home without permission, you're going to get maced in the face and kicked down the stairs. | ||
That is the exact right. | ||
That is merciful as far as I'm concerned. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay? | |
That needs to be the precedent set. | ||
So everybody else who goes, oh, you know, they posted this guy's address online. | ||
Do you want to go to his house? | ||
Their immediate responsibility needs to be, well, I like my eyesight, so I think maybe I won't do that. | ||
Actually, I enjoy being able to see and walk, so I'm going to not do that because the last person who did that was blinded and crippled. | ||
So let's leave that person alone and keep our beef online. | ||
That needs to be the precedent set. | ||
I'm absolutely in favor of that 100%. | ||
So, and again, it's like, I'm not nearly as high profile as Nick. | ||
Nowhere even close to it. | ||
Like I said, we have the same enemies. | ||
We run in the same circles. | ||
I'm also a very prominent face in the right-wing media. | ||
And so in a way, it's like, you know, Nick Fuentes doing that, it was like, I felt like a personal favor to me. | ||
Because I know there are people out there. | ||
I would want to do that to me or would feel confident to do that to more people if they got away with it with Nick Fuentes. | ||
So he almost has an obligation, a responsibility to not let this happen because if they get away with it with him, they'll do it to everybody else. | ||
In the same way that we talked about censoring Alex Jones. | ||
Doesn't matter if you like him or not. | ||
You've got to stand up against this. | ||
You've got to be against this. | ||
And you've got to take on this threat with everything that you've got because We're going down a very dangerous path right now and a spiral and a feedback loop that the mainstream media is absolutely playing into. | ||
And thinking about this, and thinking about some other stories that we've covered recently, You realize that the mainstream media's primary power is not in the way that they cover individual stories. | ||
It's the way that they're able to establish trends that then bolster narratives in the minds of the American people. | ||
I know everybody gets that on a service level, but really think about what that means. | ||
Think about in 2020, the way that they were able to establish in the minds of the vast majority of the American people, the narrative that there are Police killing black people for sport. | ||
Police hunt black people. | ||
There's a war being waged where police are just killing black men for no reason and they suffer nothing. | ||
That was the narrative that was established through maybe one or two instances. | ||
You had George Floyd. | ||
You had Ahmaud Arbery that year. | ||
And Ahmaud Arbery wasn't even the police. | ||
It was... | ||
You know neighbors of a place I was being broken into and Ahmaud Arbery tried to grab their gun causing it to go off shooting himself in the chest without getting into the details the point is There is no statistical trend they're pointing to. | ||
There is no continual stream of stories, day after day, more and more stories, black men killed by police, black men killed by police, that established this narrative. | ||
It was one or two data points that they then extrapolated out to plant in the minds of the American people that police were hunting black men for sport and needed to be stopped and we had to burn down the country To get this to stop. | ||
Totally fallacious. | ||
Total nonsense. | ||
And you've seen it where they'll go out and ask people on the street or ask people in even like, you know, whatever, panel shows, stuff like that. | ||
They'll say, how many people do you, how many black men do you believe are killed by police every year? | ||
And some people answer upwards of 10,000. | ||
10,000. | ||
The actual number is in the single digits. | ||
And most of those are easily explained and the police officers get punished for it. | ||
So they're able to take these one or two instances, extrapolate it out, establish a narrative, and then compel political action on the basis of that utterly fallacious narrative. | ||
That is the power of the media, not in the individual instance of George Floyd's death, but in using that as a data point to then establish this massive narrative. | ||
Now, the flip side of that, because everybody understands that, the flip side is the exact inverse. | ||
They can bury narratives, they can hide narratives, they can conceal narratives while still reporting on the individual instances. | ||
So I covered this yesterday a little bit, or maybe it was the day before. | ||
The fact that right now, there is a trend, there is a movement, there is a narrative occurring that is, Europe is collapsing as they attempt desperately to quash the nascent and rising right-wing spirit in Germany, | ||
in France, in the UK. This is something that needs to be reported on as a trend, as a narrative, as something that is Occurring over time, the story needs to be told that the right wing is resurgent in Europe and that the governments are desperately instituting censorship and parliamentary limitations to crush that groundswell of democratic unrest with their government. | ||
They'll report on the individual instances. | ||
Yes, the government of Germany has collapsed. | ||
They are having to reform. | ||
They are perhaps going to reestablish a coalition government a little bit later this year. | ||
Also in France, the government has collapsed and they're working together too. | ||
And in the UK, they're thinking about canceling. | ||
These are all just treated independently. | ||
There's no lines being drawn. | ||
There's no narrative being set. | ||
So the minds, the people of Europe just think this is business as usual. | ||
There are some extremists out there that need to be crushed and the government's doing it. | ||
Go back to sleep. | ||
That's the narrative that's being said. | ||
If it was instead the whim of the media to create this groundswell movement and get the energy behind the right-wing movement, then they would tell this as a triumphant story of a real threat to the liberal world order that is destroying us all. | ||
In the same way, the interactions America's had with China recently. | ||
They'll be reported on individually on the third page of the newspaper, way down the list of headlines. | ||
They'll say, yes, there was an interaction between a Chinese warship and some EU vessels earlier today. | ||
They may have cut some underground cables. | ||
Moving on. | ||
Blah, blah, blah. | ||
If instead you chart these along and you tell the story with the narrative of, hey guys, we're getting closer and closer to war with China, the Our interaction with China, our conflicts and collisions with China are increasing in rapidity and severity and China is rearming and they're firing the generals that don't want to go to war as they gear up for some sort of major attack on America. | ||
That would establish a correct and accurate narrative that exists out there. | ||
They don't want that narrative out there so they conceal it. | ||
This is the true power of the media. | ||
And probably the most dangerous and important narrative not being reported on right now, despite the fact that the individual instances are being reported on, is the rise of left-wing violence. | ||
Is the open embrace of murder as a political tool by the left. | ||
Two assassination attempts against President Trump that we know about and that got damn near succeeding. | ||
He was shot in the head by one of these people. | ||
And you had leftists, like Destiny, mainstream, extremely popular so-called liberal people, saying, yeah, the guy who was shot and killed by the assassin deserved to die. | ||
I'm glad he died. | ||
He was a Trump supporter, and he should have been killed for that. | ||
Or just mainstream pundits and spokespeople saying, this is why training is important. | ||
You've got to learn how to aim. | ||
Ha ha, I wish he'd killed Trump. | ||
They're celebrating this. | ||
Luigi Mangione. | ||
Being celebrated and encouraged by people in mainstream media saying maybe CEOs should be a little bit scared. | ||
Maybe it was a good thing he killed this father of two shooting him in the back like a coward. | ||
This is a trend that is not being reported on. | ||
This is a trend that is out there but is not being established in the minds of the people on purpose by the media because they're in on it. | ||
You can even see the way they cover Nick Fuentes. | ||
They downplay it. | ||
They pretend it's not really happening. | ||
They say it's alleged or according to Nick Fuentes, white supremacist. | ||
Even in the reporting of an attempted assassination against Nick Fuentes, they're using the exact smears that in the minds of leftist extremists justifies murder against Nick Fuentes. | ||
This is a major problem. | ||
This is a major issue. | ||
And it has to be dealt with. | ||
Because it's increasing. | ||
It's only getting worse. | ||
The media is complicit. | ||
The government is complicit. | ||
And the leftists are being emboldened and radicalized while the right wing is being dehumanized like the Tutsis in Rwanda. | ||
This is the prerequisite for actual political violence and potentially genocide. | ||
When you dehumanize one group of people, And radicalize the other. | ||
And then have a media and an establishment that facilitates and justifies the violent action. | ||
This is Like the major trend in American politics right now. | ||
And it goes way beyond just things I mentioned. | ||
It goes to the burning of the pregnancy centers, the burning of churches in Canada, the attacks we've seen against Trump supporters like Aaron J. Danielson, who was murdered in cold blood in almost a shockingly similar occurrence to the UnitedHealthcare CEO with a man lying in wait Heavily armed with people, | ||
you know, spotters watching for him, in this case, with Michael Reinholdt, killer of annual Jay Danielson, popped out from behind him, shot him in the back. | ||
He was then interviewed by Fox, by Vice News, and like celebrated for this. | ||
And he was still hanging out with all these, you know, Antifa scumbags, totally open in public. | ||
And of course, when that happened, There's video of Antifa gathering on a street corner, and one of them announces, one of our guys just killed a MAGA supporter, and they all cheer. | ||
This is the radicalization of politics. | ||
This is violence as an apparently justifiable political tool, and it absolutely has to be stopped. | ||
So I said on X that the federal government has to do something about this. | ||
They have to. | ||
Because if they don't, then we will, and then there's going to be a real big problem. | ||
What do you think is going to happen? | ||
In the same way, I don't know. | ||
People just don't have the ability to establish second-order effects in their imagination. | ||
It's very simple. | ||
It's not hard. | ||
Everybody should be able to do this. | ||
What is going to happen when you kill the CEO of UnitedHealthcare? | ||
Are they going to lower rates, or are they going to double down on raising your prices and separating the executive membership from the rest of the people? | ||
Is it just going to make everything worse, you absolute morons? | ||
What's going to happen when leftists Start trying to and maybe eventually succeeding in killing right-wingers who have done nothing but voice their opinion on a live stream. | ||
Do you think right-wingers are going to take that or do you think we're going to respond in kind? | ||
So again, it is the federal government's responsibility and obligation to handle this because we're not going to take it and we don't have to. | ||
And people responded to that going, what's the federal government going to do? | ||
What could they do? | ||
Well, they can't do anything unless the guy actually kills him, then they can arrest him. | ||
But they can't do anything about this. | ||
Absurd. | ||
Ridiculous. | ||
Of course they can. | ||
You want to know the answer? | ||
Think about how the federal government treats the right wing right now. | ||
I want them to do that to the left wing. | ||
Problem solved. | ||
Problem solved. | ||
Dismantle these networks. | ||
Track the people down who are doxing right-wingers, who are threatening right-wingers. | ||
You think they don't have surveillance of the internet? | ||
They can't track these things down, even if the X account is anonymous? | ||
Of course they can. | ||
They've done it for right-wingers for years. | ||
They need to do it for left-wingers because it's not right-wingers that are out there shooting up Christian schools. | ||
It's not right-wingers that are attempting to assassinate the presidential candidate. | ||
It's not right-wingers that are showing up at some streamer's house with a gun after having just committed triple homicide to kill their political opponent. | ||
That's left-wingers. | ||
It is destroying this country. | ||
It's only going to get worse. | ||
And the only authority that can handle it is the federal government. | ||
They therefore have a responsibility and obligation to do so, or it's gonna get a lot worse, and the blood's gonna really start to flow. | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
Second hour of American Journal is on this Friday morning. | ||
We'll go out to a few of your phone calls now. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's go to Will in California. | |
First through the gate here. | ||
Welcome, Will. | ||
You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, Harrison. | |
Merry Christmas to you and your new family there. | ||
And, you know, speaking of Christmas, I think it'd be a Christmas gift if government would just shut down for a little while. | ||
At least they wouldn't be able to spend our money for a week or two, and that would be a plus. | ||
But, you know, I agree with you now. | ||
It's more of a simple... | ||
When it really was defined more as an omnibus when it came out. | ||
And, you know, but they're still blaming Elon and Vivek for what we did by making our voices heard once we found the tyranny hidden in that huge omnibus. | ||
I mean, government pay raise? | ||
I mean, what an insult. | ||
Not opting out of Obamacare, shutting down investigations of the J6 committee and billions more to Ukraine. | ||
And then funding this Global Engagement Center for more censorship, and they're blaming Elon and Vivek. | ||
I think that's something we should take credit for. | ||
We've made hundreds of calls to not only our congressmen, but every one of the congressmen. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
I couldn't agree with you more, Will. | ||
And that's another thing that Owen said that I agree with. | ||
It's a win-win situation. | ||
The government shuts down. | ||
It's kind of a win. | ||
The bill gets passed through our intervention and our pressure. | ||
That's also a win. | ||
So it's really a win-win situation. | ||
We have already won. | ||
I just... | ||
I just don't really get the outrage of why this didn't pass in the first place. | ||
But yeah, I agree with you. | ||
And Merry Christmas to you as well, sir. | ||
I appreciate the call. | ||
Let's go to John in Cleveland now. | ||
He wants to talk about the government shutdown. | ||
Go ahead, John. | ||
You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, great, Harrison. | |
Awesome to speak to you, man. | ||
No, my thought was Congress still gets paid as long as the government shut down. | ||
I think as long as we're thinking about term limits and we're thinking about things like that, why do these people deserve to get paid if they're going to force the government shutdown for something they should have voted on six months ago? | ||
They're going to give them a resolution that's going to take them forever to read, and then they're just going to try to pass it or not pass it. | ||
But the guy picking up leaves in the front of the White House, maybe he's not going to get paid if the government shuts down, but they will. | ||
Yeah, that's the thing. | ||
I mean, when they say government shutdown, they literally mean they're just going to like, it's like COVID. Like, they're going to put up barriers in front of the parks and say this park is now shut because of the government shutdown. | ||
Even though it doesn't cost anything to keep a park open, they're going to shut it down. | ||
They're actually going to pay somebody to go out to put up caution tape to shut down a park. | ||
When just leaving alone would be free so it's all just it's a game they play look what is what is it is not impacted by government shutdowns yes the federal workforce through furloughs government national parks will be closed air travel there will be delays the IRS partial it says EPA and FDA inspections which doesn't mean that things will get passed it just means that nothing will get passed meanwhile what is not affected is Social Security Medicare food assessment and visas and passport services so It's all really just a game, | ||
as far as I can tell, and I'm sick of playing it. | ||
I've had some interesting comments on Axe. | ||
Thank you so much for the call. | ||
John, very good point. | ||
Congress still gets paid, even when they shut down. | ||
So it's really, you know... | ||
It'd be great for them. | ||
Wolf Kriegler ESQ on X says, on the current spending trajectory, we're headed for Argentina-style hyperinflation. | ||
Spending must be dramatically cut and redirected if we want a chance to avoid that fate. | ||
With that said, Republicans should have passed yesterday's bill. | ||
So some interesting comments there from Wolf Kriegler. | ||
Organically Man on X says, this is perfect. | ||
Now it's public that Biden was a fraud in making everything he did fraudulent. | ||
Trump can now use that to undo everything done and clear back to 2020. And that is an interesting read of this Wall Street Journal story that admits that Joe Biden has basically been Non-compass-mentus. | ||
He's been non-functioning mentally since the moment he got into office, which maybe that is what that means. | ||
Maybe Trump can come in and go, hey, you guys admitted that Biden never actually made these decisions, so none of them are actually valid, and they're all undone, and we even have to go back over the last four years and undo what was done. | ||
It could be even more than just undoing the executive orders. | ||
It would be reversing them. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
It is... | ||
It is interesting to see who is interacting with this Nick Fuentes story. | ||
Some people that I wouldn't have expected to speak up are speaking up, which is good to see. | ||
And it's getting a lot of attention. | ||
A lot of people are basically demanding that Elon Musk respond to what's happened here because the doxing That led to the assassination attempt on Nick Fuentes happened on his platform. | ||
Some views, some posts of Nick Fuentes' personal address got something like 16 million views on X and was never taken down. | ||
I have been doxxed on X, reported it, and it wasn't taken down. | ||
The person wasn't banned. | ||
This is a very big issue. | ||
If you post something, even... | ||
At this point, posting quotes from the Bible will be immediately censored and deemed hateful conduct and hidden in the replies. | ||
Literally, I've seen it happen. | ||
If you post revelations about the synagogue of Satan or you post passages from Matthew saying that the Jews killed Jesus, they will remove it instantly. | ||
Doxing doesn't get removed and there's no response if you report it. | ||
Which is horrifying. | ||
And is it a tool for the left to threaten violence against their political enemies? | ||
And it has to be stopped. | ||
And a lot of people close to Elon have been talking about this. | ||
I just saw ALX tweeted about it. | ||
Even Matt Walsh has come out. | ||
He says, if this is true, it proves why doxing is not a troll or a joke, but essentially an act of attempted murder. | ||
People do this because they very explicitly want to get the target killed. | ||
It should be treated as a criminal offense, and those who participate in doxing campaigns should be held liable when this inevitably happens. | ||
I completely agree. | ||
It's very good to see Matt Walsh taking up this argument. | ||
And it's disturbing to me to see so many people on the right wing who, I don't care if you like Nick, but you can hate Nick Fuentes all you want. | ||
I really don't care. | ||
But it's really the same thing with the You know, you're not healthcare CEO. It's like, but he's a gay cowboy fed. | ||
And it's like, so you think he should die? | ||
You think he should die because you don't like him. | ||
You're the bad person. | ||
You're the problem, actually. | ||
It actually doesn't matter who he is or what he's done. | ||
You're the one advocating for murder. | ||
So you're on the wrong side of this argument. | ||
Exactly the same thing with, you know, healthcare. | ||
Is the healthcare system broken? | ||
Yes, obviously. | ||
Does that mean you get to kill the people who work for those companies? | ||
Are you retarded? | ||
Or evil? | ||
Because it's got to be one of those. | ||
These people, man. | ||
And by the way, since we're on it, since we're on the topic of healthcare, you've all seen these stories. | ||
Woman's right leg amputated after waiting eight days for bed at Winnipeg's HSC to treat open wound. | ||
There's another story, even a few days ago, about a guy who had some sort of brain aneurysm or something. | ||
Had to wait six hours in the emergency room in Canada and just died. | ||
Just died because he couldn't get help because, well, the hospitals are filled with Indians that arrived a week ago and there's no private health care, so they don't have an option. | ||
You either wait and die or take the suicide pod. | ||
Or engage in MAID, which is like the number one cause of death at this point. | ||
And this woman had her right leg amputated because she had to wait eight days for a bed. | ||
That is the beauty and the gift of socialist healthcare that they want to replace our healthcare system with. | ||
Manitoba woman had her right leg amputated after complications following a knee replacement surgery two months earlier. | ||
Roseanne Milburn, 61, went ahead with the scheduled amputation last Friday after weeks of complications stemming from post-surgery infection. | ||
In late November, a surgeon at Winnipeg's Health Services Center began removing dead tissue from her right knee with the intention of stitching her up later that day. | ||
After she was seen by an orthopedic surgeon at Concordia Hospital, she was sent to Concordia but could not be transferred back to HCS because there wasn't a bed available for the specialist to finish the procedure. | ||
Instead, she spent eight days languishing at Concord with a painful open wound, and it eventually got infected and the entire leg had to be removed. | ||
That, again, is the horror of socialized medicine, and that's what people are saying, you know, we have to kill CEOs because they prefer this. | ||
Ridiculous and absurd. | ||
Now I'm going to go to a video that went absolutely viral yesterday. | ||
It was like the first thing I saw when I woke up. | ||
Multiple people had sent it to me. | ||
And it is a very powerful rant that Tim Pool went on. | ||
I think we'll probably just play this whole thing. | ||
I will comment on the other side. | ||
I think he a little bit loses steam at the end. | ||
I don't know. | ||
The way this clip closes out is a little bit disappointing. | ||
And I think it's because as solid of a grasp on the situation Tim Pool has, he's not in total command of all the facts. | ||
And the leftist liberal weasel word rhetoric tricks are so powerful that unless you really, really are ready to Lay down the law. | ||
They're going to be able to slither their way out of it. | ||
Let's go to clip number 15. Here's Tim Pool ending the career of a sniveling liberal live on his show. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
You have. | ||
No, I haven't. | ||
unidentified
|
No, no, no. | |
Stop, stop. | ||
You don't know anything about these January 6th cases. | ||
You don't know why these people are in jail. | ||
You don't know that a man is in Brooklyn right now for three years without charge or trial. | ||
And when Donald Trump says these people have been held for too long, you say, no, Trump is wrong. | ||
Keep them locked up. | ||
That's fascist. | ||
Dude, you have been sitting here with no knowledge of the specifics of some of these cases. | ||
There is a man in Brooklyn right now, I'm going to say it again, no charges whatsoever brought. | ||
He's been in jail for three years. | ||
For you to sit there and say it is good that he remains locked up is fascism. | ||
That is saying the hierarchy, the hierarchical system of the courts and the government is just and the process is all that matters. | ||
And I am saying perhaps three years is enough. | ||
Because I actually have moral logic and an understanding of these cases. | ||
Hence, my position on January 6th has always been the people who have attacked police must go to prison. | ||
But three years is a... | ||
Long time for assault on an officer. | ||
We have seen people on the far left, notably when they were firebombing all across Minnesota. | ||
33 people murdered. | ||
And how many criminal charges do we get for this? | ||
When they firebombed a police station and forced the police to evacuate. | ||
On May 29th, 2020, when thousands of far leftists firebombed the White House grounds and set fire to St. John's Church and injured 100 police officers, how many People went to prison for three years. | ||
How many of them who never showed up on that day are in prison for 20 years? | ||
Enrique Tarrio wasn't even in D.C. on January 6th. | ||
And you are saying that man, who only, his only crime was, quote, don't leave. | ||
That's his only crime. | ||
You think he should be in prison for 20 years because you're a fascist. | ||
You don't care what the facts are. | ||
You don't care if this is unjust. | ||
You only care that the machine state has decreed you are not to be locked up. | ||
And this is the problem I have with the left. | ||
They don't know the facts. | ||
They don't care about the facts. | ||
They view morality as a blanket government stroke of the pen. | ||
And every person, regardless of their crime, should be in prison for decades. | ||
I reject it outright. | ||
The people who fought cops should go to prison. | ||
They did. | ||
It's been three years. | ||
But when you've got people who are on misdemeanor charges for having walked into a building at 4 p.m. | ||
after the riot, and I know some of these people, They walked into a building for two minutes and walked out. | ||
And they got 18 months for that. | ||
I don't see you defending the innocent people who walked onto a public grass at a public building after a right had been completed. | ||
You don't know. | ||
You don't care. | ||
You've taken a tribal position and people are suffering because of it. | ||
Now you say that Donald Trump saying the injustice that we've seen warrants commutation or pardons, you say that means he's advocating for violence. | ||
This is the ultimate problem. | ||
Then you cite a press release from Maryland saying, but the right's more violent. | ||
There is a distinction between a white supremacist as a right wing group and a run of the mill Christian conservative who showed up on that day not to protest. | ||
Let's talk about Brandon Strzok. | ||
He never went in the building. | ||
He was on the other side of the building. | ||
There was a permanent protest. | ||
He walked up the stairs and he was yelling. | ||
They put this guy in prison. | ||
There is Owen Schroyer. | ||
Who was at a permanent rally who was yelling death to communists. | ||
They put him in prison and specifically cited his speech. | ||
My dude, you don't know what you're talking about. | ||
And it's fine. | ||
I get it. | ||
We try to be polite. | ||
We try to be nice. | ||
But there are so many young liberals who sit here and say, the corporate press told me that these people are bad and the machine state government has decreed it by pen. | ||
So I don't care what crime they committed. | ||
I don't care what the jury said. | ||
I don't care who was on the jury. | ||
Enrique Tarrio, who was not there, should be in prison for two decades. | ||
Tell me this now. | ||
Why is Enrique Tarrio in prison? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, so they uncovered with him his plot to overthrow the government. | |
Enrique Torres? | ||
Yeah, and his organization. | ||
What plot? | ||
Who's they? | ||
Give me some data. | ||
Stop squinting at me and saying the prosecutors did a thing. | ||
You didn't know. | ||
You didn't read it. | ||
You didn't read the court papers. | ||
All you know is the fascist machine state told you he should be in prison and you're saying yes to them. | ||
Tell me why. | ||
unidentified
|
I understand that laws on the books have been there for a long time that I agree with that if it's Proven that you had a plan and you wanted to act on it. | |
And then days after- What's the proof? | ||
The proof- Say the proof. | ||
Don't ask. | ||
Say it. | ||
Communications between- What communications? | ||
What did he say? | ||
What did he do? | ||
unidentified
|
Are you, is this serious? | |
Are you going to tell me why you think Enrique Tarrio should be in prison for 20 years, or are you going to say the government decreed it? | ||
unidentified
|
I just explained to you. | |
The government said so. | ||
Is that it? | ||
unidentified
|
It's usually law enforcement, which I guess is a part of the government. | |
Government said so? | ||
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
Law enforcement that uncovers evidence of communications, a memo that he crafted and sent to his organization. | ||
Saying what? | ||
unidentified
|
That detailed each institution of government that they were going to try to overthrow. | |
Then just days later, His organization is at the Capitol. | ||
Three months featured witness evidence to Tario and co-defense included videos, thousands of messages and encrypted chat groups, as well as a public message on Parler. | ||
Honorable 4th, January 6th, Tario convened a ministry of self-defense to coordinate Proud Boys' leadership on January 6th. | ||
The chat show that Tario stationed in Baltimore Hotel encouraged the Proud Boys as they attacked the Capitol. | ||
Let's figure out what that encouragement was. | ||
Oh, are they going to actually say in the article? | ||
So here's a citation. | ||
Okay, that's interesting. | ||
Wikipedia asserts that they did this, but there's actually nothing in the news article that actually states that it's true. | ||
Well, now we've got a problem. | ||
Let's try this again. | ||
Let's try a secondary source. | ||
Let's see. | ||
Ah, there it is. | ||
They introduced evidence that Tario discussed with associates a plan to have a large crowd in Washington storm government buildings in a scheme they called 1776 Returns, in which the Winter Palace was used as an apparent code for the U.S. Capitol. | ||
In a message, he said, make no mistake, we did this. | ||
Do what must be done. | ||
And he directed the Proud Boys to do it again. | ||
unidentified
|
So the question then becomes, in the bigger picture, So are you going to at all acknowledge that you just blew up over something that I was absolutely citing fairly? | |
I don't think you cited it fairly. | ||
unidentified
|
I think people should be prosecuted for engaging in plans to overthrow our government. | |
That's a very loose definition of plans to overthrow the government. | ||
Y'all don't seem to be that informed. | ||
Wait, look, respectfully, I cover a lot of protests and riots. | ||
A lot of people try to protest and occupy government buildings. | ||
Do you think that qualifies as trying to, what is it, overthrow your government? | ||
No. | ||
Okay, good. | ||
unidentified
|
But if they had a plan... | |
To take control of the government, which was this one. | ||
If this was an actual plan, this was the leastly most ridiculous plan ever. | ||
They went after people for having Lego sets of the Capitol. | ||
I mean, the level of political prosecution, would you even admit that there was some level of politics when it came to the prosecution of the J6s? | ||
Would you say politics played a role in this? | ||
Because I'm engaging with this as thoughtfully as possible. | ||
Not trying to grandstand. | ||
Of course, often, for very justifiable reasons, prosecutors will try to make an example of someone who, for example, tried to overthrow the government to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. | ||
I see why such a thing categorized as sedition would be uniquely bad to prosecutors. | ||
And political in that this all involved politics, right? | ||
I'm sorry, I have to say this. | ||
the wikipedia article making those claims is not citing any actual proof that they said those things so again it's like a very powerful first half and then it almost fizzles out a little bit and you can you can see why right the the The left liberals have this way of just like, well, look, if the laws are on the books, you know, I just... | ||
These are just the laws that need to be followed, and they didn't follow the laws. | ||
So you guys are not very informed on this. | ||
And the fact is that maybe they aren't that informed. | ||
Enrique Tarrio was in prison on January 6th. | ||
He wasn't just out of D.C. He was in a jail cell. | ||
So how you could say he was encouraging the Proud Boys, he was incommunicado. | ||
He was in a jail cell in a different city. | ||
Okay, so that's ridiculous. | ||
You encourage them. | ||
Plans to overthrow the government? | ||
The United States government? | ||
That's what, like, I don't know, man. | ||
Republicans, like, you gotta stop being polite to these people. | ||
Like, the first half of that was exactly right. | ||
These people are utterly wrong. | ||
They're totally fascistic. | ||
Their entire worldview is dictated to them by tyrants, and they willingly go along with it because they're bootlicking scum, and that's how they need to be treated. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, he had a plan to overthrow the government. | |
The only response to that is to laugh in their face. | ||
Oh, he had a plan to, oh, the Proud Boys were going to overthrow the government. | ||
The United States government was going to be overthrown by the Proud Boys? | ||
Are you... | ||
Are you stupid or lying? | ||
Because it's one of those. | ||
So Tim Pool, he was exactly right there. | ||
And then he goes to the AP to try to disprove it. | ||
It's like, dude, they're lying. | ||
Do you know the term unspoken conspiracy? | ||
They literally said they had a plan to overthrow the government, but they never said it to each other. | ||
They shared it telepathically. | ||
That was the argument that they were convicted on, Stuart Rhodes, Enrique Tarrio, and others. | ||
So, hey, maybe they aren't as informed as maybe they should be because they didn't even make the best arguments for this. | ||
And, of course, comparing it to the way the Black Lives Matter protesters was treated is cliche at this point because it's so true, because it's so undeniably true. | ||
And again, these people, they can... | ||
Rhetorically dance around the fact as it stands. | ||
The fact is that Tim Pool is exactly right. | ||
They don't care at all. | ||
I mean, think about this. | ||
The Black Lives Matter riots, as Tim Pool pointed out, firebombing the White House, lighting the church on fire, injuring 100 police officers. | ||
That church that they tried to burn down then put up a Black Lives Matter banner Enrique Tarrio was imprisoned for tearing that banner down and burning it. | ||
Not starting a fire that could have killed people and destroyed historical sites, but a controlled burn of a symbol And that's what he was thrown in jail for. | ||
So free speech is a myth in this country. | ||
You can burn an American flag, but try burning an Israeli flag or a Black Lives Matter flag or try driving over a rainbow crosswalk and see what happens. | ||
We have blasphemy laws in this country. | ||
They're just gay Jewish ones. | ||
But at the end of the day, this is the left. | ||
They want anybody that disagrees with them imprisoned or killed. | ||
They'll celebrate it. | ||
They'll justify it. | ||
Even if they don't know anything about it. | ||
And they have to be stopped. | ||
They absolutely have to be stopped. | ||
Your calls now. | ||
Let's go to Sean in California. | ||
Sean, thank you for calling in. | ||
You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Got in clear today? | |
Yep. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Excellent. | |
Hey, before we get rolling... | ||
Sorry, you're dropping in and out there, Sean. | ||
I don't know if you can get to a better place with some better reception, but we'll go back to you if you stay on the line. | ||
Just try to get to somewhere where you got better signal. | ||
We got line six, Godzilla in Tokyo. | ||
Maybe we'll get better signal from halfway around the world. | ||
Godzilla, you're on the air. | ||
No, no, I'm not in Tokyo. | ||
Hang up on it. | ||
I'm kidding. | ||
Okay, it was Godzilla in Wisconsin. | ||
Okay, go ahead. | ||
Yeah, sorry. | ||
I thought I said that to the operator there. | ||
Yeah, I wanted to talk. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Tokyo's great, though. | ||
And they're a good example of how government efficiency is so blatantly freaking obvious. | ||
I've been calling in and bugging you guys forever about this, and now it's just in style to be all red-pilled when obviously so many people, even on our side, are just so blue-pilled Blue pill that you can't even imagine, and they're living in the Matrix. | ||
They don't want to accept it still. | ||
They'll let these shootings, like in Madison, keep happening. | ||
These wars in the Middle East keep happening. | ||
Everything will just go on as normal because the country's cut, and the devil is just running rampant. | ||
You know, this is the most sinful generation and population of Earth that I can think of. | ||
Even if you take into consideration Babylon in biblical times, considering how much technology we have. | ||
And, you know, like, it's actually, Harrison, a threat to national security to this point. | ||
And, you know, a lot of the military guys will be like, you know, America's the greatest military, and I agree. | ||
But, like, look at the food we give our soldiers, the fuel we give our soldiers. | ||
Look at the vaccines. | ||
We're just smoking them all the time. | ||
They get no benefits. | ||
We treat them so poorly. | ||
And it's a threat to our security, you know, if you look not only on... | ||
The worldwide scale, but also domestically. | ||
And then you have Russia in the mix, where you look at them pound for pound. | ||
I'm not a Russia fan either. | ||
But pound for pound, you look at their tanks, you look at their jets, you can get three of their jets for the price of one of ours. | ||
Ours is slower, higher to maintain, cost so much, because there's so much stealing going on. | ||
Like, they got busted $35,000 for a toilet on a jet. | ||
You know, they're like, what's the toilet made out of? | ||
You know, and I understand, you know, everyone needs to make money. | ||
I'm not some sort of communist, and a little grease is needed to make things go fast and make things operate efficiently. | ||
I'm not saying, you know, we shouldn't have capitalism, but there is a fine line when it gets broken into corporate corruption. | ||
And it's a threat to our country and it's a threat to all of us. | ||
I thought this would be long gone after Corona and the vaccine, you know, the biggest, bigger than Hitler, bigger than Mao, just everyone getting injected with some sort of sci-fi movie DNA altering mechanism that's going to kill God knows how many just everyone getting injected with some sort of sci-fi movie DNA altering mechanism that's going to kill God knows You know, who knows if it's even reversible at this point? | ||
I have a feeling it's going to be like the movie Aliens and people are just going to, it's already to the point people are losing their mind and getting messed up. | ||
You know, then you throw in the old spiritual warfare aspect. | ||
It's never been worse. | ||
People are falling to the devil left and right. | ||
And it's so simple in the Bible. | ||
You go to James 4, 7, it says you want to resist the devil. | ||
All you got to do is fall under the authority of God. | ||
They say the translation now is submit, but it's really not submission. | ||
If you look at the Greek test, it's like be a subject to, you know, they always try to make like God like you have to, like he's your boss or king. | ||
God doesn't need to be Absolutely. | ||
It's like saying, you know, obey your father or something, right? | ||
It's not saying that you're a subject to your father. | ||
It's saying that he's the one in charge and you have to respect. | ||
No, I completely get what you're saying. | ||
And, you know, the fact is that the mainstream media still dictates to people how to feel about things. | ||
And it's incredibly powerful when people don't even realize it's being done to them. | ||
They're able to, and this is what I was rambling about in the first hour, they're able to establish in the minds of the American people whether or not they should care about certain things. | ||
By the language that they use, by the words that they say, they are signaling to your subconscious either, you know, think this is a big deal and get mad about this, get fearful of this. | ||
Or this is no big deal. | ||
It's fine. | ||
Business as usual. | ||
Go back to sleep. | ||
Here's the facts. | ||
Just the facts. | ||
It's entirely dictated to people how they feel about certain things and what they believe about certain things, and they don't even realize it's being done to them. | ||
It is a subtle but total influence on the minds of the American people. | ||
We'll be right back on the other side. | ||
I do want to remind you to go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
Thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
That's the affiliate link to purchase your awful human or a T-shirt or a hat and support us on American Journal. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
Welcome back. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, this is The American Journal. | ||
I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
It's about all sorts of things, mostly just leftist violence slash insanity and the way these things intertwine and are facilitated and accelerated by the mainstream media. | ||
Again, following up with the clip of Tim Pool savaging that liberal. | ||
unidentified
|
But the Proud Boys tried to take over the government. | |
They almost overthrew the American government because they wrote a list of government agencies and said, let's take it over. | ||
I mean, it's just absurd. | ||
It's the same thing that happened with Stuart Rhodes. | ||
They're like, well, they had a quick reaction force, meaning they had people and guns stashed states away. | ||
Okay? | ||
And? | ||
And what? | ||
If you can show that there was a plan and then they carried out that plan, even if the plan fails, then you've got an argument. | ||
Just like somebody has a note that says, I'm going to murder Harrison and then they fire a gun at me and miss, they can still be arrested for attempted murder because they attempted to do the crime even if they didn't carry it out. | ||
If I just sit here and write down, Department of Justice, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, let's take this over. | ||
Is that a plan to take over the government? | ||
Or is that Nothing. | ||
Is it absolutely nothing? | ||
It's not a plan. | ||
It's not actionable. | ||
It wasn't attempted to be implemented. | ||
Never happened. | ||
It was a thought crime. | ||
It was a thought crime that they were convicted of. | ||
Brandon Morello says, great job, Tim Kast. | ||
Enrique Tarrio was sent to prison because he wouldn't follow the DOJ's lie. | ||
And this is the real thing to understand here. | ||
The DOJ wanted Tarrio to say Trump worked with him to orchestrate January 6th. | ||
He told me that directly. | ||
I've heard exactly the same thing from Stuart Rhodes. | ||
The whole point of the prosecutions of the January Sixers, especially the people higher up, was to put them on terrorism charges, threatened to put them away for decades to And then offer them the carrot. | ||
Then say, or you can throw Trump under the bus, give us the evidence we need to bring him into this RICO charge, and then you'll get, you know, two years tops. | ||
Maybe no jail time. | ||
Maybe you'll be let out this week. | ||
All you have to do is tell us that you were in communication with Trump or someone close to him, and he was behind this attempt to take over the government. | ||
That's what they wanted. | ||
It was a pressure campaign. | ||
It was extortion to put massive, decade-long sentences in front of them and say, or you can throw Trump under the bus. | ||
That's who we really want. | ||
And they didn't do it. | ||
And now they're paying the price for it. | ||
During the BLM riots, two lawyers firebombed a New York Police Department vehicle moments after officers got out. | ||
Under President Trump, they were appropriately charged. | ||
But under Joe Biden, the charges were reduced and they were sentenced to about a year. | ||
This case clearly shows the DOJ was sympathetic to those who aligned with their same beliefs. | ||
Lawyers in NYPD police car firebombing sentenced to prison. | ||
They got out in a year. | ||
They firebombed a police vehicle in around a year. | ||
Enrique Tarrio was in prison in a different city on January 6th. | ||
He faces 20 years for the unspoken conspiracy. | ||
And leftists defend this and act like they're the liberal ones who are just following the law. | ||
Outrageous and insane. | ||
Now we're halfway through the show and I've hardly plugged it all, which is stupid of me because we won't be around if that continues. | ||
I'm giving myself a very serious talking to. | ||
Optimal human is what I suggest you try. | ||
If you are looking for something that will have a tangible effect in your life, that will overcome the poisons that we're being fed in our food and our water, as the great report by Psyopcop showed at the beginning of this show. | ||
and many other, in fact, let's just go quickly To bolster my argument that our food is poison, let's talk about the actual poison in our actual food. | ||
Clip number 11, yoga mat material being used in bread. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
They literally put it in bread. | |
It's yoga mat material. | ||
And it's legal, and once again, illegal in Europe. | ||
RFK specifically talked about azodicarbonamide. | ||
What would they put that in, like a... | ||
Subway bread. | ||
Like Google Subway. | ||
Yes, Subway bread previously contained azodicarbonide, a chemical that is also used in plastics and shoes. | ||
When did they stop? | ||
2014, it looks like. | ||
Yeah, when the food babe. | ||
She actually brought this to everybody's attention because it was in Wendy. | ||
It was in McDonald's. | ||
And I think most of the companies didn't remove it, but she specifically was picking on Subway. | ||
She had a massive campaign. | ||
She got it out of Subway, but a lot of other companies and a lot of breads in the supermarkets and stuff, they still have the yoga mat material in them. | ||
Just one of... | ||
Infinite examples of the way that our food and water is not food or water in many cases. | ||
It's poison. | ||
And I don't think you could ever quantify the negative effects this has on energy, overall health, chronic disease, just absolutely everything. | ||
On a societal level, but also on a personal level. | ||
And you might not even know that you're experiencing certain things in your life because of a vitamin deficiency, because you're not getting the right minerals. | ||
Or you might have enough vitamin, but it's not bioavailable, so you're not actually absorbing it. | ||
Or it doesn't have whatever other corresponding vitamin it needs to really make a positive difference. | ||
Optimal Human gives you all of it. | ||
You'll notice that the first day you drink it, I did, I'll say. | ||
Gut health and digestion, brain health, body balancing, adaptogens, which is what I'm talking about. | ||
It means that they can actually adapt to be absorbed into your body. | ||
It's incredibly powerful stuff. | ||
If you've ever thought about shopping at InfoWars.com, Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison and get yourself some Optimally Human. | ||
I guarantee you will not be disappointed. | ||
If you've ever tried the green drinks, I mean, it's a massive trend now because they're so popular, because they're so powerful. | ||
They're effective. | ||
They're good. | ||
There's lots of different types. | ||
Optimally Human is absolutely the best. | ||
You can get it on discount at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
You can get the starter pack. | ||
You can stock up. | ||
Whatever you do, it tastes great. | ||
It tastes like tea. | ||
I put a little lemon in it. | ||
It makes it taste even better. | ||
I think maybe honey would make it even taste better than that. | ||
But Optimal Human is fantastic and available now. | ||
And do it for us because we need to stay on air. | ||
But do it for yourself because you will really notice the difference. | ||
And, you know, you may find that you're not just, you know, chronically tired because of your job or whatever. | ||
It's like, oh, maybe you're just vitamin deficient. | ||
And once you get those vitamins, you realize you don't have to suffer all the time. | ||
You don't have to be tired all the time. | ||
You don't have to, you know, have brain fog all the time. | ||
These things can actually be fixed. | ||
And Optimal Human is a wonderful way to do it, thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
And by the way, you know, we read the statement from Nick Fuentes earlier saying that 24-hour security, if you're going to get the right stuff, if you're, you know, under threat of attack, $13,000 a week was the price tag he put on it. | ||
Now imagine the cost that InfoWars has to bear on a weekly basis. | ||
We have 24-hour security for 50-plus employees at our office, not to mention the massive facilities we have that allow us to have this incredible studio, the crew here to make everything look really good, to facilitate the phone calls, to make sure the satellite uplinks are correct. | ||
I mean, we have absolutely massive costs just keeping this operation running, and we don't One of the other big stories that we're talking about today is this government shut down the continuing resolution. | ||
They have to find a solution by midnight tonight or the government will shut down and all of the babies will die. | ||
I've been assured terrible things will happen. | ||
The sun will be blotted out. | ||
The sky will turn red. | ||
And Bernie Sanders will cry. | ||
So we have to keep the government going forever, regardless of how incompetent it is. | ||
But really, it's about this 1,500-page omnibus bill that they tried to pass that redefined U.S. persons to be anybody physically in the United States, just literally destroying citizenship by a change in definition buried 800 pages into a bill that was supposed to pass through blackmail and extortion. | ||
Or redefining criminals as justice-impacted individuals. | ||
As well as setting up the potential for a pandemic response that would make COVID look like a walk in the park. | ||
And all sorts of other things that were just terrible. | ||
Those all got removed. | ||
Now, you know, we'll be determined whether or not they'll pass this next round. | ||
And this is being blamed on Elon Musk and Donald Trump. | ||
CNN brought this up, and I've been... | ||
Just massively enjoying Scott Jennings on CNN. I don't know where this guy came from. | ||
I don't know what he was doing before. | ||
But I get he's like the token conservative on CNN that I guess maybe they brought on because they got smashed so bad during the election. | ||
They realized like we can't keep being insufferable liberal people. | ||
Jackasses all the time, so they brought on a conservative to try to balance it out, and he just destroys them continuously, and he's having a great time doing it. | ||
You can just tell he's having the best time. | ||
I envy Scott Jennings. | ||
He gets to go in and argue with the dumbest people in the world on national television, and he's just got a... | ||
Grin on his face the entire time. | ||
He is having the time of his life, and I'm loving it too. | ||
Clip number six, here's Scott Jennings pointing out that the Democrats spent four years calling Trump a dictator, only now to call him a puppet. | ||
A little contradictory. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
I mean, when I open up Twitter, the only tweets I see are a couple of yours and six or seven of Elon Musk. | |
Just remember, Jeff said it. | ||
The two most influential tweets. | ||
Elon's, Jennings. | ||
unidentified
|
But think about this. | |
$27 billion bought him exactly what he wanted, and that's unfettered access. | ||
Now, I hope he uses it well, and I hope he uses Doge to the credit of all these great opportunities to cut spending. | ||
I really, really genuinely hope he's successful. | ||
But if he acts like this and uses that Twitter power to wreck the car, I mean, we want change, but not all change is good change. | ||
I mean, the counterargument is if he gives information to people that they didn't previously have or some transparency into our government and they act on it, Is that necessarily a bad thing I might offer? | ||
unidentified
|
I think that's a great idea. | |
Do you think Elon Musk is actually telling people things that they couldn't find out, except for Elon Musk's great reporter? | ||
Elon Musk is doing this to gin up people, to call their congressman or congresswoman, and tell them to vote against something Elon Musk doesn't want them to vote for because it doesn't directly benefit Elon Musk. | ||
Let's be very clear. | ||
He's not here. | ||
How do you know that? | ||
How do I know that? | ||
Because look at this bill. | ||
You're making a serious allegation. | ||
unidentified
|
You're essentially alleging corruption. | |
First of all, I'm not alleging corruption. | ||
I'm alleging that Elon Musk has a particular interest in seeing certain things happen that benefit Elon Musk's business. | ||
And that's a fact. | ||
He's a businessman. | ||
He's not here as a staffer. | ||
If you were a staffer, if you were working on the Hill, then he should go work on the Hill. | ||
Doge is not... | ||
He's purposely not going into the government because then he'd have to... | ||
unidentified
|
Show a lot more information about himself than he and Vivek Ramaswamy want to. | |
So now they're just advisors. | ||
They're unpaid advisors. | ||
And for that reason, for that reason, Elon Musk is puppeteering Donald Trump and every other member of Congress that he wants to, and every other member of Congress that he wants to, to benefit Elon Musk. | ||
I'm not sure Trump is doing anything to dissuade people of that. | ||
unidentified
|
In October, the principal Democratic argument was, Donald Trump is going to be a dictator. | |
And today it's, Donald Trump is just being puppeteered by other people. | ||
Which is it? | ||
It can be both. | ||
No, it can be both. | ||
He's an all-powerful dictator who is obsessed with getting power unto himself, but now he's the puppet of Elon Musk who only cares about profit. | ||
Which is why he's running Twitter in a way, running X in a way that advertisers refuse to support and is losing money and not maximizing the value of his investment. | ||
So all of their arguments are just utterly inconsistent internally. | ||
They make no sense. | ||
What are they arguing? | ||
What is their beef? | ||
As far as I can tell, it's that Elon Musk is saying things. | ||
It's that Elon Musk has a platform. | ||
They have a platform, and he's saying things. | ||
They're saying things. | ||
What is the issue? | ||
What is the issue? | ||
He's encouraging people to call their congressman. | ||
Is that the problem you have? | ||
Should he not be allowed to do that? | ||
They're just angry that they're losing. | ||
They're angry that they're losing. | ||
How many billionaires of theirs have spent inordinate amounts of money? | ||
I mean, he talks about $27 billion or whatever that he paid for Twitter. | ||
A drop in the bucket compared to what has been poured into leftist causes that have infiltrated every single branch of our, not just government, but society as a whole. | ||
And they're just whining. | ||
They're just whining and complaining and nothing they say has any merit. | ||
They're not even complaining about bad things. | ||
They're just like, Elon Musk Is a person who has ideas and he's saying them. | ||
And they're mad about that. | ||
They're very angry about that. | ||
Because his platform is too powerful. | ||
So? | ||
So what? | ||
Give that same platform. | ||
Like, if Elon Musk handed his Twitter account over to you people, you think suddenly everybody would be on your side? | ||
You think it's the platform? | ||
Or do you think it's the ideas that resonate with everybody? | ||
It's not the platform that he has that makes people agree with him. | ||
It's the fact that he's right. | ||
It's the fact that he actually shows concern for the same things that Americans show concern for. | ||
That guy, the black guy, whoever that was, his first interjection was, you're saying that Elon is telling them things they can't get anywhere else? | ||
What type of argument is what? | ||
So let's just extrapolate that argument real quick. | ||
So if somebody else is saying something... | ||
Elon Musk can't say it, shouldn't say it. | ||
It's bad that he's amplifying it, even though it can get so... | ||
Should there be one news outlet that gets to report everything? | ||
If one news outlet reports something, does it mean other outlets aren't going to? | ||
Well, just because CNN is reporting a thing that people can find somewhere else, CNN has a right to speak? | ||
Do you get how nonsensical this is? | ||
They have nothing. | ||
They have no arguments. | ||
All their arguments are utterly contradictory and inconsistent. | ||
Logically, internally, it just doesn't exist. | ||
So what they're mad at is that the people actually have two champions now. | ||
I said this yesterday. | ||
This is the tag team. | ||
This is what we've needed the entire time. | ||
This is the missing ingredient of the Trump revolution. | ||
It's somebody like Elon Musk coming along and giving him the institutional backing that he needs. | ||
To get things done, to establish the narratives, to tell the right stories, to convince people of what's actually going on in this country, not the maniacal delusion that people are suffering under, courtesy of the mainstream media. | ||
Okay. | ||
Okay, and again, just like everything, they've created their own monsters. | ||
Elon Musk only became who he is because you people became obsessed with electric cars and he had the best one. | ||
And he did a lot through government subsidy, by the way, which you're all in favor of. | ||
And then you people's mind virus infected his children and he got pissed off at that. | ||
And then you people sent the entire government against him. | ||
With every single branch capable of doing so, going after Elon Musk and every one of his companies for whatever ridiculous charge they could manufacture. | ||
So you made him your enemy. | ||
And now you're mad he's fighting back. | ||
The same thing over and over. | ||
They're just mad that you're fighting back. | ||
They're all just angry that you're not taking it. | ||
Just like we talked about with the drone nonsense, where they gave us no answers, said nothing about what it is, gave no conclusions, told us nothing, and then said speculation is conspiracy theory. | ||
They want you to just sit down and shut up. | ||
Just take it. | ||
When they attack you, tell them thank you. | ||
When they lie to you, think that you deserve it. | ||
And when they tell you you don't need to know something, you're supposed to be happy with ignorance. | ||
Nobody's happy with this. | ||
Nobody has to take this. | ||
And Elon Musk is simply giving a platform to the people that you would rather have silenced. | ||
That's the big issue. | ||
We get it. | ||
We understand it. | ||
And that's why we're doing it. | ||
We do the things that you hate because you're our enemy. | ||
We didn't decide that. | ||
You did. | ||
Now you have to live with it. | ||
Let's go to your calls. | ||
Now let's go to Boris in Iowa. | ||
He wants to talk about the spending bill. | ||
Thanks for calling in, Boris. | ||
You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, thanks for having me on, Harris. | |
So, like, I just wanted to point out that they've done this before. | ||
Right before Christmas, Federal Reserve Act of 1913, they tried to ram through, and they did. | ||
They got it through on December 22nd through the House and then through the Senate, and then Woodrow Wilson signed it into law on the 23rd. | ||
You know, you have a supposed president, Joe Biden back in the White House canceling his plans now suddenly. | ||
So, you know, they do this to us every time. | ||
They try to use it, use Christmas as a distraction to try to ram things through on us with a lame duck president. | ||
It's just, I think we should just let it shut down. | ||
Just let it go ahead and happen and just we'll operate without them. | ||
I mean, airlines got to make money. | ||
You know, they're going to keep operating without the federal government, whether TSA is there or not. | ||
So I wouldn't worry about it. | ||
I think what's really different about it, everything this time is political violence, and just like we were talking about Nick Fontaine, I think it is tied into all this, that they're willing to go to extremes. | ||
Did you say Nick Fontaine? | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
Whoever the guy that they tried to assassinate. | ||
Okay, Nick Fuentes. | ||
Sorry, I didn't know if you were talking about it. | ||
unidentified
|
Sorry. | |
No, you're good, man. | ||
I like Nick Fontaine. | ||
That'd be his name if he was a singer in Vegas, I think. | ||
I know, right? | ||
unidentified
|
Nick Fontaine. | |
Sorry, that threw me off. | ||
Sorry, finish your thoughts more. | ||
I didn't mean to interrupt. | ||
unidentified
|
No, you're good. | |
You're good. | ||
But no, you know, like, yeah, they're trying to kill us. | ||
Like, legit, like, they know that we're awake and that we're paying attention now. | ||
And they're like, well, we need to kill the people that are speaking out for them. | ||
And that's just... | ||
That's my piece of, my two cents there. | ||
Just everybody needs to get armed, get their guns, and take care of themselves. | ||
Absolutely, 100%. | ||
It's a great argument for the Second Amendment, right? | ||
I mean, the Second Amendment, like it's never been more clear how the Second Amendment guarantees our First Amendment. | ||
That if you don't have a Second Amendment and you say something people don't like, they can just come and kill you. | ||
So you need a Second Amendment. | ||
And, you know, if that guy had actually gotten into Nick's house, I pray Nick has a loaded pistol sitting right there next to his desk and could have defended himself. | ||
I think he had... | ||
Security at the time. | ||
So they must have been the ones who called the cops. | ||
unidentified
|
But... | |
Yeah, they... | ||
They're trying to kill us. | ||
It's, you know, never been more clear. | ||
You're exactly right. | ||
And in terms of the government shutdown, yeah, this has happened many times before. | ||
In fact, if you remember all the way back to, you know, 2019, Democrats shut down the government for 35 days, the longest in U.S. history during the 2018-2019 change of house control to the Democrats. | ||
It wasn't a big issue then. | ||
It's not a big deal now. | ||
Hashtag shut it down. | ||
That's from anti-nwo on X. So yeah, I'm fine with it shutting down. | ||
I'm just kind of confused at the way that they got rid of all the stuff that we hated. | ||
Why wouldn't we go through with it? | ||
That would be, I don't know. | ||
That, to me, would be victory. | ||
But shutting down the government is also a form of victory. | ||
So again, it's a win-win situation. | ||
A 360 win, if you will. | ||
Thank you for that call, Boris. | ||
I do appreciate it. | ||
Let's go to Dennis in New York. | ||
He wants to talk about the spending bill as well. | ||
Dennis, thank you for calling and holding. | ||
You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, hi, Harrison. | |
How are you? | ||
Merry Christmas. | ||
Merry Christmas, sir. | ||
Thanks for calling in. | ||
unidentified
|
And I love you guys. | |
I love Owen and I love you, Harrison, but I have to side with you on taking the win as far as the CR goes. | ||
And I'll tell you why. | ||
Number one, I'm not afraid of a government shutdown, but we have to be smart about this. | ||
Or our side has to be smart about things because we know the globalist media and the globalist powers and all the dumbass libs that they've tricked will use any means at all to demonize Trump and those people in Congress who are any good at all. | ||
Yeah. | ||
So we can't give them that ammunition. | ||
So if we have a win, take that win. | ||
A bird in the hand. | ||
Okay? | ||
A proverbial bird in the hand. | ||
And the problem with the spending is fiscal responsibility is a necessity, but how do you do it? | ||
Do you shut down the government? | ||
I'm not afraid of that, but... | ||
But is that even going to help? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, and the way to do it, though, I believe, has to occur. | |
We have to get there baby steps, but consistent with resolve. | ||
And that's not going to happen until we have change in leadership, namely Trump and anybody after him. | ||
We have to change the monetary policy. | ||
In other words, we have to go to maybe gold, maybe Bitcoin, whatever. | ||
We need to do what the BRICS are doing. | ||
How do you fight the globalist Western Central Bank? | ||
Okay, you don't play their game. | ||
If we went to an asset-backed system, the money would be limited, okay? | ||
The Fed couldn't print it willy-nilly. | ||
That would control their spending. | ||
And I'm not sure how we go about it and how it's done, but I believe that that's the way to take their power away. | ||
Yep. | ||
That's my two cents, anyway. | ||
No, I totally agree. | ||
Thank you very much for the call, Dennis. | ||
And you're reflecting exactly how I feel about it, that we just have to think strategically about this, think about the ammo that we're giving the left, and it's like, sure, they're going to lie about it, but just... | ||
Don't make it easy for them. | ||
Like, yeah, they're going to try to spin it in whatever way they can, but why give them ammunition? | ||
And right now it seems to me like, you know, they could make the argument of, hey, we gave the Republicans everything they want and they still aren't working with us. | ||
So, like, they're acting in bad faith. | ||
They said they wanted these things removed. | ||
We removed them and they still won't pass it. | ||
Well, these people aren't serious. | ||
They aren't really negotiating with us. | ||
They just want to see the government shut down. | ||
They're just against you and they want to make your, you know, Christmas holiday go badly. | ||
Just why give them that? | ||
Why give them that ammo if you've gotten everything that you wanted? | ||
If there's something wrong with the continuing resolution, if there's a pandemic preparedness thing in there that we need to talk about, then let's talk about it. | ||
Just pass the hurricane relief, pass the stuff, and let's just move on. | ||
Welcome back. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, third hour of American Journal is on. | ||
Here calls and I still have a lot of videos to show you. | ||
In fact, let me give a shout out right now to Chief Trumpster. | ||
He just put a thread together. | ||
I personally... | ||
Have a stake in at Chief Trumpster on X. X user safety compromised how X Elon Musk failed to stop assassination attempt on Nick Fuentes by allowing rampant doxing. | ||
On 1218, a lunatic with a gun attempted to kill Nick over an X post about abortion. | ||
Here's how X failed to protect Nick and his family. | ||
On November 5th, right after Trump's victory, Nick Fuentes made a Post on X about abortion rights. | ||
The post would go viral, being viewed by over 100 million people. | ||
Little did anyone know how this post would trigger a cascade of events that resulted in three innocent people and two dogs dying. | ||
To be clear, Nick's post was a joke. | ||
The post was, your body, my choice forever. | ||
Which is like, I genuinely don't understand the outrage that this caused. | ||
It's just a funny inversion of my body, my choice. | ||
And it's also from somebody who, no offense Nick. | ||
Has never touched a woman's body, so it's like obviously ironic. | ||
It's obviously not serious. | ||
Your body, my choice. | ||
Okay, clearly a joke. | ||
And that's what Chief Trumpster says. | ||
To be clear, Nick's post was a joke. | ||
The post was made on Nick's stream on Rumble where he was covering the election. | ||
Nick's post was about mocking the left's overblown reaction to the results and abortion rights. | ||
It's all these people going, we're not going to be able to control our bodies anymore. | ||
And it's actually being like, yeah, that's right. | ||
That's right. | ||
I'm the one in charge now. | ||
Just mocking them for their overblown and outrageous reaction to what wasn't even an issue during the election. | ||
That's the other crazy part about this. | ||
Trump isn't even interested in abortion restrictions. | ||
So it's just literally... | ||
Worried about Bigfoot here. | ||
The post instantly went viral as the outrage from the left was swift. | ||
The left's meltdowns weren't exclusive to X. They were across multiple platforms such as TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube. | ||
While anger and meltdowns from the left may be amusing to some, things got way worse. | ||
The left-wing activists began to escalate on X. It went from typical leftists melting down to doxing and actionable threats of violence that were seen by millions. | ||
One of the most viral doxes had over 16 million views and it was not taken down until very recently. | ||
From some woman named Christine who posted that tweet as well as his home address. | ||
Saying, your home, my choice. | ||
16 million views on that. | ||
In total, Nick's address, phone numbers, and other personal info were viewed on X by over 20 million people based off the current archive data that has been logged. | ||
That number is likely way higher than that. | ||
The metrics does not include death threats on the platform. | ||
Death threats on X received millions of additional impressions. | ||
Users even went to the home of Nick Fuentes, posting a picture with them in front of the home and threatening to harm Nick and his family. | ||
X did not take these posts down. | ||
At this point, X allowed Nick's personal information to become common knowledge Despite reports, the vast majority of posts that contained Nick Fuentes' personal information remained up. | ||
The death threats against Nick continued. | ||
No terms of service were enforced. | ||
Due to the mass doxing campaign, lunatics such as Marlo Rose knew exactly where Nick Fuentes lived. | ||
They admitted they had bad intentions. | ||
Marlo went to his house because she, quote, wanted there to be some kind of consequence. | ||
Nick pepper sprayed her and he was charged not her sadly there are accounts on X that mocked Nick Fuentes for being cautious for his safety these accounts claims there wasn't any threat despite her being able to carry a weapon for example and continue to either tacitly support the docs campaign or in court or encourage this behavior shortly after a shooter attempted to assassinate Nick after killing Caleb Janice and Sarah Mason he accessed Nick Fuentes his docs and said yo Nick outside his door he was armed with a pistol crossbow and other weapons he had one purpose to kill Nick Fuentes The assassin traveled over two hours to his house. | ||
The information was widely available on X. He tried to break into his home for close to 10 minutes. | ||
Police arrived in a chase and shoot, resulting in the shooter killing two dogs and engagement with the shootout with the cops. | ||
And I completely agree. | ||
And a lot of other people are recognizing this as well. | ||
And it's not the first time this has happened. | ||
And it's not... | ||
Going to end anytime soon, he continues, This isn't about censorship. | ||
This isn't about terms of service saying you're not allowed to question historical events. | ||
It's about publishing people's information for the purpose of getting them attacked. | ||
And X allows it. | ||
And this has to stop. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Out to your calls once again. | ||
Let's go to Jim in Montana. | ||
I know you guys have been holding on for a while, so I appreciate that. | ||
Jim in Montana, on Line 9, you're on the air, sir. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, Harrison. | |
So, the CR, I think the one major sticking point on the CR was the fact that they were going to remove the debt ceiling for two years. | ||
Now... | ||
I just personally don't believe that anybody in Congress has the ability to keep the spending under control for any amount of time, let alone two years. | ||
So what does that mean to you? | ||
unidentified
|
That is the reason why I believe it was shot down, was because of the debt ceiling not being there for two years. | |
Do you think if that gets removed, it'll get passed? | ||
Do you think that's the sticking point? | ||
unidentified
|
I do believe that that's probably the biggest sticking point right now. | |
I mean, we're at, what, $36, $37 trillion? | ||
Myself, I call Congress at least two or three times a week, and I've been asking for an amendment on every appropriations bill That if there isn't any money that goes to a foreign entity, it has to go back through Congress and be approved. | ||
Angola trains. | ||
Pentagon giving gazillions of dollars to Mr. Zylinski. | ||
I don't know. | ||
That's my opinion. | ||
No, you're exactly right. | ||
And again, where our money goes is outrageous and ridiculous. | ||
unidentified
|
And that gentleman before that was saying about how do we get the thing under control, spending under control, he's right. | |
We have to go back on—we've got to get rid of the Federal Reserve. | ||
We have to go back on the gold standard. | ||
And as a—I'm throwing—I mean, this is— What I see is the U.S. needs to join BRICS and stop using the dollar as a weapon. | ||
That's interesting. | ||
That's interesting. | ||
Have the U.S. join BRICS? I hadn't thought about that. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, because the biggest thing that I can see that everybody – the reason why a lot of countries don't want to do business with dollar is because they don't trust the U.S. not to weaponize the dollar against them. | |
Right, and we've been doing that to an increasing degree, and of course – In a weird way, it's totally ineffective, right? | ||
We put all these sanctions on Russia. | ||
Their economy is doing better than ever. | ||
We've used sanctions on people through the power of the U.S. dollar to try to get our, I guess, what is considered our, with quotation marks around it, agenda in place around the world. | ||
But it's not working anymore. | ||
It's ineffective, but it still scares people off. | ||
From using it. | ||
unidentified
|
Right. | |
But of course the big danger is that we know that the one world government depends on and will only be implemented following the creation of a central bank digital currency that will tie everybody in biometrically to a totally non-existent either crypto or you know Some form of digital currency. | ||
Like, that's the real danger. | ||
And I even hear people, I think that the last caller sort of said, hey, it can be gold or it can be Bitcoin, something like that. | ||
But clearly that is playing into their hands. | ||
And the globalists want us to abandon the dollar in favor of some global digital central bank currency, which would only massively empower their surveillance and control grid in the first place. | ||
I'm in favor of ending the Fed and issuing notes, as we're constitutionally allowed to do, through the U.S. government, keeping it not digital, but physical. | ||
Backing on gold, I think, is fine. | ||
El Salvador has been having success in using Bitcoin, but I'm wary of that just because of the central bank digital currency problem reaction solution program going on right now. | ||
So, you know, it's... | ||
It's not as easy of a tightrope to walk here as maybe some people think because the obvious solution to the collapse of the dollar is total global enslavement. | ||
So we're not going to do that. | ||
So it's a little bit... | ||
Tricky, one way or another. | ||
But then again, our ridiculous overseas adventurism and the starting of war in the Ukraine and the endless support for Israel. | ||
I mean, these are the things that bring about the sanctions that are driving people away from the dollar. | ||
So if we can end the foreign interventionalism, which is there ostensibly to bolster the U.S. dollar, right? | ||
That's all ideas. | ||
Like, our dollar is backed up by the most powerful military in the world. | ||
And, you know, we basically will punish you for not using it. | ||
But it's that same military-industrial complex that is driving people away as we attempt to use sanctions as a form of warfare, making people not trust the dollar. | ||
So we're sort of screwing ourselves with that, and if we stopped that, then we'd be in a lot better place. | ||
Thanks for the call, Jim. | ||
Let's go to Andre in Manitoba, Canada. | ||
Andre, you're on the air, sir. | ||
unidentified
|
How's it going? | |
Good, thank you. | ||
Merry Christmas to you. | ||
unidentified
|
It was kind of interesting to hear that you had mentioned Manitoba in one of your news clips about that woman who lost her leg. | |
It's terrible. | ||
It's not often that Canada really hits, you know, like not global news, but platforms like this. | ||
I think geographically Manitoba is exactly center of Canada. | ||
And if you zoom up on the map, it's like Manitoba is the center really of a lot. | ||
It's not a huge populace, but ironically, it being the center, it has a level 4 biology or microbiology lab, which really, people aren't really connecting the dots. | ||
But if you hear the story and you do your own research, this is the missing link to the Wuhan world. | ||
COVID-19 problem. | ||
Interesting. | ||
unidentified
|
Espionage. | |
Classic espionage. | ||
China infiltrated the whole Canadian system years ago. | ||
Like back in the 90s. | ||
Oh yeah, no. | ||
The Chinese, well now the Indian immigration is getting the most attention because it's sort of maybe the most obvious, but like for years, you know, Canada's been dealing with incredibly high house prices because Chinese billionaires are buying up all the real estate. | ||
China has had a basically free hand to operate in Canada for a very long time and are using, you know, economic... | ||
Power to totally disenfranchise the Canadian people. | ||
For a long time, this has happened. | ||
unidentified
|
It's just not common knowledge, though. | |
So as a Canadian citizen, you live under this umbrella of we have a different accent, we have a different culture in one sense. | ||
We're British Canadians. | ||
We're misled to kind of believe that we are separated from the Americans. | ||
We're just washed. | ||
My God, are we washed. | ||
And then we have a A leader, a dictator, a prime minister, whatever you want to call it. | ||
We didn't vote him in. | ||
He's not there because he's elected in. | ||
He's manipulated the system so he could remain in power. | ||
He's been there forever. | ||
He's been there for like 10 years? | ||
unidentified
|
It's crazy. | |
He's not going to leave. | ||
He's not. | ||
To really see the whole scope... | ||
Of the global elites. | ||
You have to understand that when the U.S. politics become an issue, it really affects everyone globally in one sense. | ||
I never was introduced or really interested into politics until Donald Trump became this figure of entertainment. | ||
Like, oh my God, he's running for politics? | ||
And then he just exposed to a different world. | ||
This is back in like 2015, 2016. I feel like a lot of people have that experience. | ||
You know, we try to talk about, you know, I try to spend probably like half of my shows on international things. | ||
And, you know, whether that's what's going on in the UK, in Germany, or going on in Canada, it's true. | ||
I feel an obligation to do that because so little attention is paid by any other news outlet. | ||
And we'll be having on Alex Cargill at Trans Splendor. | ||
He'll be coming on on Monday to talk about it. | ||
And ever since he announced that he's coming on, my notifications on X have been filled with a... | ||
Very contentious argument about Pierre Poliev, or however you say it, still can never say his name. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm not even sure. | |
Like, I really don't know, but I know what you're trying to get to, but everyone kind of forgets, and it's about history, that this is an ancient anxiety. | ||
Like, this has been going on since the Romans. | ||
Politics and government, like, control over the people has been going on for, like, thousands and thousands of years. | ||
That's a constant struggle. | ||
unidentified
|
The Romans were a little bit creative. | |
And in order for them to remain in power, they had to create a distraction. | ||
And so creating the Olympics was what everyone wanted. | ||
Yeah, right. | ||
So that during these Olympic Games or sport, because the idea behind sport is to take people's thoughts away from politics. | ||
And then change your whole psyche. | ||
I'll tell you, it goes even deeper than that, and it depends on when in the Roman history that you're talking about. | ||
But one of the most effective things they figured out later on during the reign of Justinian is when it really came to the fore, is they had chariot races. | ||
By then, the gladiatorial combat had sort of gone out of fashion, and it was chariot races. | ||
And there were two teams. | ||
There was the blue faction and the green faction. | ||
And they were constantly fighting with each other. | ||
And the leadership of the Roman Empire very deliberately used these two factions to fight against each other and leave the leadership alone. | ||
And it was the blue-green faction. | ||
And it's just throughout history. | ||
Every city had a blue faction and a green faction. | ||
And it didn't really mean anything. | ||
It was kind of just the colors. | ||
But the blue were a little bit more of the elite. | ||
And the green were the... | ||
Rabble rousers and the hoi polloi or whatever you want to call them, the plebeians. | ||
But it was all games and street fights and chariot races, and that's what people would pour their energy and effort and outrage into. | ||
And the only time that the people of Rome stood up against their emperor, it's actually kind of a fascinating story. | ||
Because there was a, there was like a combat between the Blues and the Greens that the Emperor's, like one of his main bodyguards, I think his name was Bloody John, I think is what they called him. | ||
He went out and arrested a leader of the Blue and a leader of the Green faction. | ||
And so the Greens and Blues said, okay, truce, we're gonna have a truce between us while we deal with this Imperial intervention. | ||
And that was when you had these massive riots. | ||
I think they were called the Hippodrone riots, but it eventually ended when Belisarius went out and just slaughtered a bunch of them and re-established control. | ||
But this was in Constantinople, and it was during the Byzantine second half of the Roman Empire under Justinian. | ||
And yeah, it was the only time that... | ||
Justinian was almost ousted. | ||
He was about to run away and abandon the imperial throne except his wife basically shamed him into staying. | ||
But they basically almost overthrew the empire because they stopped fighting each other and started going after the empire together. | ||
So the divide and conquer strategy is as old as time itself and was refined to a very deliberate science under Justinian and throughout the Byzantine Empire between the blue and green factions. | ||
I've been thinking about this a lot. | ||
There's something... | ||
There's something... | ||
Well, I haven't thought it through yet totally, but there's something very metaphysical in a weird way about green versus blue and red versus white. | ||
And these two... | ||
Because originally there were four teams. | ||
It was red, white, blue, and green. | ||
And then the red and white sort of became defunct and it was just blue versus green from then on. | ||
Then there's this other theory of red versus white being like milk versus blood and that like... | ||
All of the conflicts in human history can sort of be divided between red and white. | ||
The best example being the Bolshevik Revolution where you had the Communist Reds versus what was called the White Army of Russia. | ||
There's something very interesting if you start looking into the way these colors are used throughout history to denote sides of conflicts. | ||
And now, of course, you have red, white, and blue for America and green being the environmentalism that is instrumental in destroying nationalism and creating a one-world government. | ||
There's something to this. | ||
I don't know what it is. | ||
I haven't thought this fully through yet, but it's been rattling around my mind, so I'm glad you brought it up to let me go off on a little bit of a tangent there. | ||
But it's all about the way that the elite use divide-and-conquer tactics on their own people and the way they can distract us with games and hating each other, knowing the whole time that if we ever combine forces against the people oppressing us, they will not stand a chance. | ||
So, you're exactly right, and... | ||
People think that we're unique or that somehow because we have phones in our pockets or calculators and television that we're somehow different than the people that came before us. | ||
The reality is human nature is almost unbelievably consistent throughout history and the same things, same tactics and tactics. | ||
Methods used to control populations from ancient Egypt until today has not exactly changed a lot, which is one of the reasons why Masons use so many Egyptian motifs in there. | ||
In their designs because the Egyptians established a system of control that was persistent and unchanging for thousands of years and is sort of the model for the future world of control where human nature and human behavior and free will and nature itself can be overcome and won't cause problems to the control system they're establishing. | ||
It's very interesting stuff. | ||
Thanks for that call, Andre. | ||
Let's go to Zach in Massachusetts. | ||
I want to talk about a Netflix film. | ||
Go ahead, Zach. | ||
Go ahead, Zach. | ||
unidentified
|
I was in the bathroom. | |
I didn't want to be talking in the bathroom at work, but yeah, I wanted to talk about that new movie, Carry On. | ||
My fiancé and mother-in-law wanted to watch it, so we put it on or whatever, and... | ||
I don't know, a lot of weird things in that movie, like a person sneaking. | ||
I don't want to ruin, I guess, so much of the movie, but... | ||
Well, tell us about it. | ||
Is it a documentary? | ||
Is it a narrative? | ||
unidentified
|
No, it's just... | |
No, it's more of, like, that movie where, like, the train in wherever it was from Philadelphia had that crash, and all the, you know, poisonous gas went all over there, and then, like, a few months later, the... | ||
The same thing in real life happened. | ||
The crane crashed. | ||
So you think it's some sort of predictive programming? | ||
unidentified
|
Right. | |
So in this movie, there's a security guard that's new on the shift and he gets a call or ended up finding a little listening device and told to put it in his ear and he's directed to let somebody slip a bag onto a plane. | ||
So, pretty much, in the movie, where it gets weird, it's like, the guy who's flipping the bag on the plane is wearing a red hat. | ||
I don't know. | ||
So is it a disaster movie? | ||
What's the plot? | ||
We're looking at the trailer right now. | ||
It looks like some sort of thriller. | ||
I just hadn't heard of it. | ||
But you think it's predictive programming, maybe getting people ready, or expecting some sort of disaster having to do with the airlines? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, absolutely. | |
I mean, it's kind of like dead-on point where... | ||
Mike Adams is talking about and Alex Jones is talking about just like organs being able to just It melts and people bleeding from their eyes and mouth and everything like that. | ||
Word to word what Mike Adams and Alex Jones have been trying to warn people about that they might do something like this. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I was watching a movie and I just thought it was very interesting and I thought, I don't know, maybe people might want to watch it just to see what Alex and you and Mike Adams are talking about is something really in these people's minds. | ||
It's not something that we're just making up and like to talk about. | ||
Very interesting. | ||
Yeah, I hadn't heard of that. | ||
We'll have to check it out. | ||
Thank you very much for that. | ||
And yeah, look, whether it's on purpose or just sort of a phenomenon of psychic connection, it does happen a lot where movies come out and they either preempt or sort of occur at exactly the same time as the actual occurrence. | ||
The one of East Palestine was like too much. | ||
It was like happened in the exact same place and it was exactly the same disaster. | ||
To again, the point where it's like, maybe this is coincidence, but it's almost hard to justify belief that this all could just be an accident. | ||
It's like, how could it have so perfectly predicted something that actually occurred? | ||
Unless, you know, it's just humans kind of subconsciously or unconsciously seeing signs and putting that in their work in a weird way, connecting with some sort of You know, prophecy, almost like prophetic capabilities that humans have, sort of nascent, that we don't exactly train or pay attention to and don't activate consciously, but it still exists there. | ||
And we don't even understand, but we just get these ideas of, well, maybe this would make a good movie. | ||
And you don't really know why, but it's because somehow your subconscious is connected to something that's going to occur in the future. | ||
It's utterly fascinating. | ||
Thank you for that suggestion. | ||
Carry on. | ||
I hadn't heard of that one. | ||
We'll go out to more of your phone calls in the last segment. | ||
Stay tuned, but we got some more stories and videos to show you, including this story that just dropped minutes ago from Jim Jordan. | ||
House Weaponization Panel releases a 17,000-page report exposing two-tiered system of government. | ||
The subcommittee says it took important steps to ensure the federal government no longer works against the American people. | ||
House Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Federal Government released this more than 17,000-page report detailing its work to Congress. | ||
Touting their success in protecting Americans against censorship of speech and the weaponization of federal law enforcement agencies. | ||
The Weaponization Committee conducted rigorous oversight of the Biden-Harris administration's weaponized government and uncovered numerous examples of federal government abuses, Jordan told Fox News Digital. | ||
Through our oversight, we protected the First Amendment by investigating the censorship industrial complex, heard from numerous brave whistleblowers, stopped the targeting of Americans by the IRS and Department of Justice, and created serious legislative and policy changes that will benefit all Americans. | ||
Which is very good to hear. | ||
And I know Jim Jordan has come under fire recently and even as far back as like 2018. In fact, it was the question I asked him at CPAC when we ran into him, I think in the beginning of 2020, just before the COVID outbreak in January of 2020. I believe when we were in Washington, D.C. and I was interviewing people. | ||
Such as Sebastian Gorka. | ||
One of the people I interviewed was Jim Jordan, and I put the question to him at the time, like, we get the talk, like, when is action going to come? | ||
And I know recently Jim Jordan has been coming under fire for the same thing, where it's like, he talks a big game. | ||
He's great when he's up on the dais and he's, you know, browbeating the, you know, federal employees that are trying to lie to us. | ||
It's fantastic, but where's the substance? | ||
Where's the thing happening? | ||
So it seems like he is promoting this report from the Weaponization Committee as being that action. | ||
The report, first obtained by Fox News Digital, states that the founding documents of the United States articulated the ideas of the American Republic and guaranteed all American citizens fundamental rights and liberties. | ||
For too long, however, the American people have faced a two-tiered system of government, one of the favorable treatment for the politically favored class and one of intimidation and unfairness for the rest of American citizens. | ||
It continues. | ||
Under the Biden-Harris administration, the contrast between these two tiers has become even more stark. | ||
The committee was created to stand up for the American people, the mission to protect and strengthen fundamental rights of the American people. | ||
You know, it's absurd that we've even gotten to this point that we need it, but I'm glad they're taking it seriously. | ||
And I hope that Trump can actually take action on some of these things more than what's already been done. | ||
But it's really not complicated at all. | ||
It's just people haven't thought about it very much. | ||
We need to do things like repeal the Civil Rights Act. | ||
I know that sounds crazy, but that is the foundation of all the DEI, all the CRT, all the justification for preferring one race or color of candidate over another, which has massively disadvantaged white people in this country, continuously Christians in this country. | ||
Not of a minority population, which is everybody except for straight, white, Christian men. | ||
We're the one being disadvantaged, which is a blatant betrayal of the very thing it was supposed to enforce. | ||
So until we're ready to do that and take the simple answer, it's going to be more complicated. | ||
unidentified
|
All right. | |
Welcome back, folks. | ||
More breaking news to cover. | ||
We'll go to your phone calls in just a second. | ||
I also have a lot of good videos I haven't gotten to yet today. | ||
In fact, let's just start off with this. | ||
Just for fun. | ||
Just for fun. | ||
Let's go to clip number eight here. | ||
I think this is real. | ||
And maybe this just represents, again, the shift in the culture war. | ||
I've never watched this show. | ||
I think this is Impractical Jokers. | ||
I don't know. | ||
Maybe the crew knows. | ||
It's whatever show where, you know, one guy's got an earpiece and there's, like, four dudes in a trailer watching what he's doing and, like, telling him what to do. | ||
And, you know... | ||
Giving him advice or giving him instruction and he has to do it and they watch how it plays out. | ||
That's Impractical Jokers, right? | ||
Yeah, this is definitely Impractical Jokers. | ||
Okay, this is actually a clip from it. | ||
So, I didn't believe it at first. | ||
I was like, well, Impractical Jokers, that's a very mainstream show. | ||
And yet here they are trolling a feminist conference and mocking their beliefs in a way that I would never expect from a mainstream show. | ||
Outlet of any sort. | ||
So, totally hilarious, very funny, and again, a sign, a signal of where our culture is headed. | ||
And it's headed in a positive direction, because as long as your culture is mocking these stupid people with their ideas that do nothing but burn our civilization down, it's a beautiful thing. | ||
Let's go now to clip number eight. | ||
unidentified
|
It's still not uncommon to hear the phrase, that's a man's job. | |
And I want to hear your thoughts on that particular phrase. | ||
So remember, just oppose their views. | ||
It's super simple. | ||
Brian? | ||
There are men's jobs and there are women's jobs. | ||
I mean, I think we all... | ||
I mean, we're not saying that that doesn't exist, right? | ||
I mean, you're not... | ||
We are kind of saying that. | ||
But it's just like, if you pull up to a garage and you gotta get, like, an alternator replaced and there's a woman mechanic, the majority of men and women are gonna look at that and be like, hey man, I'm all for, you know, women's rights. | ||
I mean, who isn't? | ||
But I also want my car to run well. | ||
You can feel it! | ||
You can feel it! | ||
I can't take it. | ||
We're going to discuss some of the most influential women, who you think they are, and sort of what gives them that influence. | ||
Michelle Obama, Shonda Rhimes. | ||
Women can do all sorts of things. | ||
All right, buddy. | ||
Now, I disagree with that. | ||
You know, the Michelle Obama thing, she got there because she slept with a man. | ||
Oh my god. | ||
Oh my god. | ||
I think Michelle Obama is a fantastic example. | ||
Why would she be in the White House if her husband hadn't gotten her there? | ||
I mean, very pretty. | ||
Very pretty. | ||
She's very pretty though. | ||
I was on TruTV I guess. | ||
That was a mainstream thing. | ||
Again, he's being ridiculous, you know, obviously. | ||
But again, it just, it represents that these ideas that are once considered sacred and unquestionable, you aren't even allowed to joke about it. | ||
Like, no, they're very silly. | ||
They're very silly ideas, and we will talk about it. | ||
We absolutely will. | ||
Let's go now to clip number nine. | ||
And I want to go to clip number three, but I think it needs to be censored, guys. | ||
Can you all check if there's curse words in clip number three? | ||
Because these all relate to one another. | ||
I would like to go to it. | ||
I forgot to mention it needs to be censored. | ||
Let's go to clip number nine first. | ||
This is how they break family, which is the core and central pillar of our society. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
Why do you think that moving out of your family's house is a PSYOP? It is not just the act of moving out of your family's house, but consider this. | |
If you have 10 members of a family, and they all scatter to the four winds, where they are at least a half hour apart from each other, or more, two hours apart, states apart, And they will not see each other anymore. | ||
And they're going to pay 10 different sets of rent, 10 different sets of utilities, 10 different sets of groceries, 10 different sets of everything. | ||
Then what are they going to do? | ||
They will live alone in these apartments or in these small structures. | ||
They will desperately crave connection with strangers. | ||
They will spend tons of money on escapist entertainment. | ||
The research actually shows the average American spends about five years of their life on escapist entertainment now. | ||
And that was before COVID. We need to actually update that information for after COVID now. | ||
But the average person, their depression is off the charts. | ||
They are crushingly lonely. | ||
Among millennials, for example, the research shows that up to 65% of them report overwhelming loneliness, and 35% of them report such incredible loneliness that they report suicidal feelings. | ||
So... | ||
I know that this system is not working. | ||
I know that shoving people back into bad families is not the answer, but fixing families where they are truly loving and caring and nurturing, building better systems where the families can take care of each other and where there's accountability as well. | ||
So that families are governed with real love and care and nurturing. | ||
And then getting people reconnected so they're not financially struggling with 10 different sets of rent, but they can all pool their money and then everybody has more money and more resources and less stress that way. | ||
Building that system back is exactly what we need so that people can at least find some safety and security in this world. | ||
And then they can talk about the problems and they can solve them together as a family. | ||
Yeah, I think that's a very good point. | ||
Again, it just points to what we value as a society, what we prioritize, what we facilitate, and what we make more difficult. | ||
Because it is a choice at the end of the day, right? | ||
You don't have to move out. | ||
But the way our society is set up, these things are done sort of unthinkingly. | ||
In the other video, we probably won't be able to play. | ||
I don't know, guys. | ||
You can tell me if it... | ||
I think it has curse words in it. | ||
But it's... | ||
I think we've played it on the show before. | ||
It's a woman basically just saying, like, yeah, I would love to be a housewife in the 50s and not have to go to work and sit under fluorescent lights all day or have to serve a corporation. | ||
I mean, it's sort of a typical argument, but the way she puts it is... | ||
It's just powerful because she's just saying it sucks. | ||
Modern life sucks. | ||
Being a single woman today sucks. | ||
It's awful. | ||
You know, we're not built for this. | ||
It's miserable. | ||
And basically, she says, you know, if I could wave a wand and take us back to the 1950s, I absolutely would. | ||
Because that's what I crave. | ||
And yet, I feel like we haven't been able to, like, that option isn't even available for us anymore. | ||
It's not like, well, now you have the option. | ||
You can do either. | ||
It's like, no, we've gone from This is the way people normally do it, and you don't have to, but, you know, getting married by the time you're 21 and being a housewife, that's just the way you do it. | ||
It is ready. | ||
Okay, let's just go to it then. | ||
Now you don't need to hear my poor imitation. | ||
Let's go to clip number three. | ||
unidentified
|
I would love to be a stay-at-home mom. | |
I would love to be a homemaker and a wife. | ||
I would love to be able to live on a homestead and go milk my cow and take the eggs out of the chicken coop and have one baby in the belly and on my hip and another toddler coming behind me. | ||
That's like my dream, but I can't do that because the way the economy is set up is I'm forced to work. | ||
I'm forced to get an education, a higher education, a college degree in order to make enough money that I can be financially independent and afford my own home or my own rent or my own gas or my own groceries, my own insurance. | ||
And it's extremely difficult to do that. | ||
And it's very isolating as a woman when you have to do all of that all on your own and you can't find somebody that you can outsource some of those chores and financial responsibilities like you would with a spouse. | ||
So no, being a single working woman absolutely sucks. | ||
It's the worst thing ever. | ||
I hate it. | ||
I would go back to the 1950s in a second just so I wouldn't have to deal with this. | ||
You're talking about a traditional nuclear family where the woman doesn't work in a married household with kids. | ||
And statistically, that was my case. | ||
You are a single woman who isn't married with kids yet. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Because of the way it is. | ||
Most women were married by the age of 21 up until the 1970s. | ||
I think it's a woman's choice. | ||
Before that, it was societally encouraged to marry young. | ||
Yeah, and it was better for women, mental health-wise, long-term, to be able to go into that long-term committed relationship and have the established family instead of being forced to slave away for a corporation that doesn't like you, doesn't care about you, makes you sit under fluorescent lights for 8, 9, 10 hours a day. | ||
You get a lunch break, you get health insurance, but do you have somebody who loves you staring at you every day like your child? | ||
No. | ||
It's horrible. | ||
It's horrible. | ||
Time from the free press. | ||
It's horrible. | ||
It's horrible. | ||
And our society is built up to be horrible. | ||
It is horrible. | ||
But it doesn't have to be. | ||
And like, you know, you can choose to do that still. | ||
It's just a lot more difficult economically, societally. | ||
And I've been, you know, my wife, when she was growing up, her mom was a stay-at-home mom. | ||
And she talks about how, like, you know, in middle school and stuff, people would be talking about what their moms did, and she would be, like, embarrassed to say my mom's a stay-at-home mom because there's an extremely strong societal pressure to think that that is bad and to be, like, shamed of that. | ||
It's really sick, the way that we're pushing people towards this lifestyle that just makes them miserable. | ||
And it's why 50% of young women or whatever are on antidepressants. | ||
So we talk about this all the time. | ||
You don't need that if you're happy. | ||
So why are we making our people unhappy? | ||
It just makes no sense. | ||
And of course then it gets into the birth rates and the fact that education and further education delays having babies for a long time means you're not having as many of them. | ||
One of the primary reasons why we are collapsing in our birth rates. | ||
And of course this is one of my biggest issues with people like Elon Musk who see the problem of collapsing birth rates and want to correct it but aren't going to the heart of how it got to this way in the first place. | ||
You know we have a We have an issue here, but it all springs from the liberalization of our culture and society and government to the point that it forces people into this. | ||
The solution to collapsing birth rates isn't to bring in immigrants. | ||
That's the most insane thing ever, but that seems to be the only response everyone has when really you need to identify the things that made your birth rate collapse and undo them. | ||
Poisoning the food and water, the societal pressures, demonizing having kids, the tax burden and financial burden of having children that makes people put it off. | ||
All these things need to be corrected, not just replacing your population with foreigners. | ||
That is the worst solution you could possibly imagine. | ||
With that, let's go back out to your calls. | ||
We've got Tim in Seattle who's called in. | ||
You are on the air. | ||
Tim, there you will be momentarily. | ||
Go ahead, Tim. | ||
You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Merry Christmas, Harrison. | |
Merry Christmas, InfoWarriors. | ||
Humanitiesuit.com is a gift to everybody. | ||
You can join and you can help bring down Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, all the COVID profiteers. | ||
There's a lawsuit pending. | ||
All we have to do is join. | ||
It's real simple. | ||
HumanitySuit.com. | ||
HumanitySuit.com. | ||
It says lawsuit filed. | ||
Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson& Johnson, NIH, FEMA, WHO. Wow, all the bad guys here. | ||
So this has actually been filed October 15th in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division. | ||
That's very exciting. | ||
So how can people join on and what's the benefit of this? | ||
unidentified
|
The benefit is to actually, you know, Speak truth to power, actually stand up again if we're allowing politicians to do all our talking for us. | |
We have to also realize that those politicians are getting pats on the head by big money, big interest, and they're never really going to say the things that we need to say. | ||
They're never really going to do the things that we want them to do, that we need them to do for our society to continue. | ||
They have a breakaway society. | ||
They want to continue with the way it's going. | ||
You can just see the last CR bill. | ||
They were going to do a lot of evil stuff with all that money. | ||
If we let that happen, thank God we didn't. | ||
But HumanitySuit.com is a way for us to actually finally step into the arena as a collective. | ||
It's a class action lawsuit. | ||
Just join it. | ||
And who knows what's going to come from it, but at least we're fighting back. | ||
So to join the class action lawsuit, do you need to have taken the vaccine? | ||
So it says the landmark federal lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, naming hundreds of defendants, including the ones we mentioned earlier, and more. | ||
The plaintiffs are seeking to ban the COVID-19 mRNA injections, chemtrails, geoengineering, weather modification, 5G communication systems, and accountability for aiding and abetting illegal border crossings. | ||
So what do you need to do to become a plaintiff? | ||
It says contact us at humanitiesuit at gmail.com. | ||
unidentified
|
I think you've got to fill out some paperwork and then basically just submit it. | |
I think it's as simple as that through emails and stuff. | ||
I think some of the paperwork might need to be notarized, but other than that, it's just your simple, you're filing paperwork in a legal lawsuit. | ||
That's just standard. | ||
Very cool. | ||
Well, I'm in favor of it, and I certainly like using the court as they stand now to try to rein in the excesses of our government and their, what would you say, corporate co-defendants at this point, their partners in crime. | ||
Very interesting stuff. | ||
So humanitiesuit.com. | ||
Thank you for that, Tim. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, you're welcome. | |
Remember, that's by Uninjected Official and Rebunked News, Scott Armstrong. | ||
They're the ones that put that out there. | ||
God bless them and God bless anybody on Team Humanity that hasn't given up. | ||
You know, we need your voices. | ||
Merry Christmas. | ||
Amen. | ||
Thank you for that. | ||
What is that headline? | ||
Thank you for that, Tim. | ||
Let's go to Sean in California now. | ||
You want to talk about both of our main topics today, the increasing leftist violence and the spending bill. | ||
All right. | ||
Oh, Sean, thank you for reconnecting because you were dropping out earlier. | ||
You're on the air now. | ||
unidentified
|
Excellent, Harrison. | |
It always seems whenever I have a lot of patriotic stuff, my phone connection goes wonky. | ||
The globalists. | ||
You're being hacked. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, well, I'm with one of the big, you know, telecoms because I paid really good and it seems they don't like what we have to say. | |
But first, Merry Christmas to you and yours and the Infowars family. | ||
You guys have delivered my package from the realalexjonesstore.com, and I'm looking at the sweater I ordered and all this other stuff, and if I had known Harrison, you were going to put a slash Harrison onto it, I would have ordered it on that morning instead of a few days earlier. | ||
You guys have me stoked, and trust me, in the new year, you know, I'm going to be remembering that, and I'm not going to spill too much of your tea, but you guys actually give us a little promo code when we get these little packages. | ||
So, folks, you know... | ||
I don't got enough incentives. | ||
Heck, every time you get a package from TheRealAlexJonesStore.com forward slash Harrison, you actually get a promo code for an extra little discount. | ||
There you go. | ||
Yeah, always a little something extra. | ||
TheAlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison so they know who sent you. | ||
Thank you for that, Sean. | ||
But I know you didn't call in to plug. | ||
What are your thoughts on the topics of the day? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, I'll leave the continuing resolution alone a little bit for timeliness. | |
I work in security, to put it lightly. | ||
And the thing with Nick, Nick's being very, let's just say the $13,000 price, that's a little on the low end. | ||
So if you guys can ferret a message for me off this call, I'll give you guys something to ferret to him. | ||
Because let's just say I don't dox people, but I can get information because of my line of work. | ||
And it's just something that Nick may want to consider. | ||
As far as further protection, $13,000 is kind of a lowball. | ||
$13,000 a week is a lowball? | ||
unidentified
|
It can be, depending on what type of coverage he has, if the guards have their shirts, etc. | |
So that's kind of a concern I have, that these folks may not... | ||
We've seen what they try to do to Donald Trump, what they've been doing to you guys at Infowars over the years, and so on. | ||
You know, like I said, a call a week ago or so. | ||
We've got to keep our heads on a swivel, and thankfully, you know, Nick kept his cool and kept his head on a swivel. | ||
You know, I have that feeling that we'll have a Merry Christmas, but we're not going to have it easy, if that makes any sense. | ||
Yeah. | ||
unidentified
|
So, you know, folks who work security like myself, we've got to be a little bit vigilant. | |
The folks who are in our armed services, they want to watch their checkpoints and other potential... | ||
We got, you know, we got to be those of us who are in that world. | ||
We got point this season. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Yeah, look, it's getting more dangerous. | ||
They're getting more crazy. | ||
And it's pretty much mainstream now that people are just openly celebrating. | ||
I mean, if that assassin had been successful and had been able to kill Nick Fuentes, do you think the left would be going, oh, this isn't what we do. | ||
This isn't us. | ||
No, we need to solve our problems nonviolently. | ||
No, they'd all be literally cheering. | ||
And people on the right would be cheering, too, is the sad part. | ||
So people are just getting to a breaking point and are openly embracing political violence now. | ||
And of course they justify it in their own heads by saying that they're just reacting to the violence from the other side. | ||
But there's no violence coming from our side. | ||
It's all coming from the left, pretty much exclusively. | ||
The only thing they can possibly point to is January 6th, which was a protest that only got violent when the police decided to fire into a peaceful crowd with violence. | ||
Non-lethal ammunition and flashbangs and forced the conflict. | ||
A total spontaneous outbreak of very moderate violence that didn't burn any cities down and didn't kill anybody except for the protesters who were slaughtered by police on that day. | ||
So that's the only thing they can possibly point to. | ||
Other than that, which again, totally spontaneous, totally random, and also roundly condemned by pretty much anybody on the right. | ||
Except for us. | ||
Although we condemn the violence too, but we also understand that they started it. | ||
And so even the violent people, even Tim Pool was like, I've always said if you assaulted cops, you know, you deserve to go away. | ||
And it's like, well, kind of, kind of. | ||
Not if you were entrapped into it. | ||
Not if you had the police attacking you randomly with no provocation and defended yourself. | ||
I may be an outlier on that. | ||
But for the wider, you know, right wing people, We're very sincere about our avoidance of violence because we know how it ends up and because we actually care about maintaining this. | ||
I had people with the CEO assassination. | ||
I was very against that from the very beginning. | ||
Despite how we feel about the healthcare system, you don't murder random people. | ||
You don't shoot people in the back. | ||
Because your coverage got denied. | ||
That's absurd and insane and nonsensical. | ||
And we had people on the right going, oh, we thought you were... | ||
Just basically saying, actually, this is a good thing. | ||
And it's like, do you not understand? | ||
We want to reestablish and reform and get back to a country where our... | ||
Institutions serve us and operate correctly. | ||
We don't want to descend into third world violence. | ||
That's what this is. | ||
It's third worldism. | ||
It's collapsing into anarchy a la any third world country you care to name where assassination gangs are the rule of the day and where Putting your hat in the ring to run for mayor is putting a crosshairs on your head and the cartel is going to take you out. | ||
That's what life is like in a lot of places that aren't America. | ||
The thing we love about America is that we built a society where people can trust each other and you don't resort to violence and the institutions are powerful enough and even handed and unbiased enough to actually settle differences and disputes without resorting to who's got the most guns and, you know... | ||
The biggest muscles. | ||
This is what America is about. | ||
We want to uphold and preserve and correct these institutions, not abandon them in favor of third world anarchy. | ||
So that's how I feel about it. | ||
Thanks so much for the call, Sean. | ||
I do appreciate it. | ||
If you're on X and want to DM me, I can pass messages on to Nick if you'd like. | ||
And maybe stay on the line and the producer can talk to you about how to do that. | ||
unidentified
|
Both work. | |
Thank you. | ||
Thank you, Sean. | ||
Let's go to Scott in Indiana. | ||
You want to talk about Elon and the Free Press. | ||
Go ahead, Scott. | ||
You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
Really enjoyed everything. | ||
We've got to have our circus and cake as we watch ourselves be demised by all of what you said earlier. | ||
But this is a great paradigm change that could really carry us Through with Trump and everything else. | ||
You know, for lack of a better term, you know, we got the Elon X army out here that can go obliterate any social media platform at once and let the politicians know exactly what we think about what the bills are saying and what they're doing. | ||
And it's going to require us on our side to quit watching the circus and eating the cake. | ||
And getting involved with the laws and the bills that they're putting forth. | ||
Like I read one, they were wanting to find out how much garden space you were going to have and what you were going to grow. | ||
So, you know, all these little details that are coming up, and every bill needs to be scrutinized to them. | ||
You're exactly right, and that is really the point of all this, and it's the same point that I was making yesterday. | ||
This is us. | ||
This is the people. | ||
Elon Musk might have the biggest bullhorn out there. | ||
Maybe second only to Alex Jones. | ||
But Donald Trump, Elon Musk, the success they're having, the fact that we are able to stop this spending bill, and again, what I find to be a totally unique and unprecedented event in my memory in America, where this would always happen and would always just go through. | ||
We stopped it for the first time. | ||
Elon Musk helped, but it was us. | ||
It was the American people, the outrage that we showed, whether on social media or by calling into Congress. | ||
This was the American people standing up against a corrupt system, and that is a massive victory no matter which way it goes from here on out. | ||
So just remember, this is what they've been hiding from you. | ||
This is the real secret behind the Infowar. | ||
This is why they hate Alex Jones and Owen Schroer. | ||
Not because they talk about it, not because they say things they don't want them to say. | ||
There's that too, obviously. | ||
They don't want the information getting out. | ||
But it's about the action. | ||
It's about telling people, you don't have to take this. | ||
You are not powerless. | ||
You can stand up against this. | ||
You can get involved in the system. | ||
You can protest. | ||
You can run for office. | ||
You can get involved in your local school board. | ||
The power is in your hands. | ||
You just have to use it. | ||
And their entire system is built to convince you that it doesn't exist or that you are helpless. | ||
Folks, we will be back on Monday and Tuesday. | ||
We will be back on Monday and Tuesday. | ||
Then we'll be off for the rest of Christmas week. | ||
But we will see you next Monday. | ||
Have a good weekend. | ||
Go to thealxjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
Infowars.com forward slash show. | ||
I've got some good news for all the InfoWars fans out there and supporters that have been upset that Vitamin Mineral Fusion, our best-selling product, has not been available for a few months. | ||
It is now back in stock, the original, exclusively available at drjonesnaturals.com, my dad's great supplement company based right here in Austin, Texas. | ||
He developed it and now it is exclusively available at drjonesnaturals.com. | ||
It has All the highest quality vitamins and minerals and a whole bunch of other super foods and herbs concentrated in it. | ||
It tastes great. | ||
It gets maximum absorption because you put it in water as a fruit punch in a liquid form so it absorbs better in the stomach and the intestines. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, It has all the essential vitamins and minerals, a whole bunch of other concentrates of super herbs that boost your immune system, mental clarity, focus, your energy. | ||
I love vitamin mineral fusion and it keeps our broadcast on the air. | ||
A true 360 win. | ||
When this product first came out five years ago, I didn't really push it. | ||
Okay, it's a vitamin mineral fusion. | ||
You know, amino acid, you know, fusion, great. | ||
It's just a staple product. | ||
And then it became more and more popular until it became our number one best-selling product just because the listeners and viewers loved it so much. | ||
Now, I know a lot of you that love it are already going to reorder it, but for folks that have never tried it, Try it. | ||
It's amazing. | ||
It's good for you. | ||
And it keeps the broadcast on the air. | ||
Our great sponsor is drjonesnaturals.com. | ||
There's so many other incredible products there like CoQ10, the highest quality. | ||
Corsetin. | ||
This is high-end quality at very low prices. | ||
You get it for 50% off together right now or 40% off individually. | ||
Next level foundational energy is not a stimulant, but feels like one. | ||
It cleans out your cells. | ||
There's the fluoride-free toothpaste. | ||
It's all there at drjonesnaturals.com. |