Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
If you thought the lies and deception in fake media had reached the crown heights of propaganda, So in what ways has the world gone mad? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, you know, when you have the chief reporter on the beat of COVID for the New York Times talking about how questioning or pursuing the question of the lab leak is racist, the world has gone mad. | |
When you're not able to say out loud and in public that there are differences between men and women, the world has gone mad. | ||
When we're not allowed to acknowledge that rioting is rioting and it is bad, and that silence is not violence, but violence is violence, the world has gone mad. | ||
When we're not able to say that Hunter Biden's laptop is a story worth pursuing, the world has gone mad. | ||
You say we're not allowed, we're not able. | ||
Who's the people stopping the conversation? | ||
Who are they? | ||
unidentified
|
People that work at networks, frankly, like the one I'm speaking on right now. | |
An entirely new generation of deep fake trickery will aid the Great Reset and the United Nations Agenda 2030. | ||
unidentified
|
That's why today I am committing the United States to achieving The sustainable development goals. | |
And as long as I am president, and well after I'm done being president, I will keep fighting for the education and housing and healthcare and jobs that reduce inequality and create opportunity here in the United States and around the world. | ||
unidentified
|
And we need to recognize that climate change became the main accelerator of all other factors. | |
And as climate change is the main accelerator of all other factors, this is also the moment to clear say that linked to the 2030 Agenda of Sustainable Development, there must be a very strong reaffirmation of our commitment to the Paris Agreement and to its implementation with an enhanced ambition. | ||
Demonizing, confusing and controlling the narrative over a still unsuspecting populace. | ||
unidentified
|
This is an example of deepfake, a word that combines the terms deep learning and fake. | |
It's an advanced form of artificial intelligence which can be used to manipulate faces and voices, making the process of creating fake identities and spreading false information much easier. | ||
The technology makes things that never happen appear entirely real. | ||
We're entering an era in which our enemies can make it look like anyone is saying anything at any point in time. | ||
Jordan Peele created this fake video of President Obama to demonstrate how easy it is to put words in someone else's mouth. | ||
August, researchers at Carnegie Mellon revealed software that accurately rendered not just facial features, but changing weather patterns. | ||
And flowers in bloom. | ||
Some of its most severe consequences, however, won't be felt by a country or a global leader, but by everyday women. | ||
Deepfakes are already being used to make the kind of revenge porn that was never possible before, one that doesn't exist. | ||
As long as you have a photograph of them, you can now make porn videos of pretty much anyone you want. | ||
The second problem with deepfakes are high-tension moments that are delta-dependent on time. | ||
Let's use an example the Department of Defense already worries about. | ||
Next week, in a small town, a local police force will unintentionally shoot an unarmed black man. | ||
And within a few hours, protesters will start to march across the city. | ||
unidentified
|
Tensions are high, and more police get deployed to monitor the situation. | |
Suddenly, an independent journalist posts a deal on Twitter. | ||
Caught on cell phone is the mayor. | ||
unidentified
|
In the video, he dismisses the death and praises the officer's use of force for eradicating the criminal. | |
Thank God, the criminal needed to die. | ||
The video goes viral almost immediately. | ||
unidentified
|
A peaceful protest that could have been defused now switches to an angry riot. | |
What the heck happened in Germany in the 20s and 30s? | ||
You know, very intelligent, highly educated population, and they went barking mad. | ||
And how did that happen? | ||
The answer is mass formation psychosis. | ||
When you have a society that has become decoupled from each other and has free-floating anxiety, and then their attention gets focused by a leader or a series of events on one small point, just like hypnosis, They literally become hypnotized and can be led anywhere. | ||
Congress has allowed this cancer to metastasize as politicians nationwide gorge on COVID relief money. | ||
Compliant doctors and nurses bathe in vaccine incentives and insurance money and the Senate and House continue to be the kept minions of Silicon Valley donations. | ||
Nothing will change unless we the people cancel Silicon Valley before it cancels us. | ||
John Bound reporting. | ||
unidentified
|
It's Tuesday, October 22nd in the year of our Lord 2024. | |
board. | ||
unidentified
|
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
I think it's time to blow this scene. | ||
Get everybody in the stuff together. | ||
Okay, three, two, one, let's jam it. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
unidentified
|
It's Tuesday, the 22nd of October. | |
We've got a lot of stuff to talk about today. | ||
It's going to be a big show. | ||
I'll tell you right now, the conversation today is going to be basically two topics. | ||
It's the American election and Israel and where those things intersect. | ||
I just heard the whole crew moan. | ||
I don't want to talk about it either, guys. | ||
But it's what's going on. | ||
And we have to. | ||
We have to. | ||
And we're excited to. | ||
unidentified
|
They forgot to shut the studio door. | |
I said we're going to talk a lot about Israel, and I literally heard an audible groan from the guys in the studio. | ||
What am I supposed to do? | ||
What am I supposed to do? | ||
We're headed towards World War III. Israel's talking about launching a major attack against Iran. | ||
The American military is saying once this attack happens, we're in for a month-long conflict. | ||
We just sent THAAD missile interceptors over there with one to two hundred You know, American military men, meaning that we are now sitting ducks. | ||
We are now the bait. | ||
We are now the tripwire for Armageddon, just waiting to be obliterated by a hypersonic Iranian missile so that the propaganda machine can start churning out the calls to war. | ||
I don't want to talk about it either, but... | ||
We have to. | ||
But we have to. | ||
And we'll be joined by Brother Nathaniel in the third hour. | ||
And I imagine he's going to want to talk about it too. | ||
So we're going to talk about it a lot. | ||
Sorry, sorry folks. | ||
But there's also a lot of election news to get to as well. | ||
And yeah, a lot of other stuff. | ||
A lot of videos to show you. | ||
And we'll take your calls in the second hour as well. | ||
Like I said... | ||
It's going to be a Jew-heavy episode, let's just say that. | ||
Again, it's not up to me what is in the ether out there every morning. | ||
And this morning, there's a lot of talk about Israel. | ||
That's what we're going to try to get some clarity on. | ||
We're going to try to get some clarity on it. | ||
Have a principled stance on Of being pro-America, America first. | ||
And see where that gets us. | ||
All right, let's begin today, as we do every day, with our daily dispatch. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, here it is, folks. | |
Your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 22nd of October, 2024. | ||
Ukrainian defense minister talks to WAPO about corruption, new recruits, and that, quote, victory plan. | ||
Ukraine's minister of defense, Rustem Umarov, sat down with the Washington Post to talk about various developments and aspirations in the war-torn... | ||
As concerns rise and support is increasingly needed, Umarov emphasized the hope for Ukraine to enter NATO as soon as the war is over. | ||
He also spoke about deterrence as part of the plan, more specifically the ability to strike military targets deep inside Russian territory. | ||
Touching on the issue of corruption, Umarov said there have been issues with the military procurement company Special Techno Export, which was linked to money laundering scandals, is now under the Defense Ministry's Remember, there's a lot of corruption in Ukraine. | ||
It was, for a long time, considered the most corrupt country in Europe. | ||
And Trump tried to get to the bottom of that and they impeached him over it because it would have interrupted their plans to plunge the entire region into perpetual war. | ||
So now that's where we are. | ||
And I guess we'll do the war. | ||
It's kind of like the elections. | ||
You'll do the war first and then you'll be able to elect people. | ||
You'll do the war first and then you'll be able to deal with the corruption. | ||
The problem is, though, that you're just incentivizing the war to go on forever because the people in power who are corrupt and are making money hand over fist from the squeezing of the American taxpayers, they have every incentive to prolong the conflict, to make more money and to put off the eventuality they have every incentive to prolong the conflict, to make more money and to put off the Just like it's now in. | ||
Zelensky is now incentivized to keep the war going as long as possible because as long as the war is happening, he's in power and as soon as it's over, he'll probably be voted out of office. | ||
So we are now incentivizing the Ukrainian officials in more ways than one to keep this Interminable conflict going forever, no matter how many generations of Ukrainian men have to die. | ||
We'll get back to that in just a little bit with an extended statement about Ukraine and Israel from our godfather, Ronald Paul. | ||
Meanwhile, The Hill has this article. | ||
What if Joe Biden was the best candidate all along? | ||
What if, you guys? | ||
What if? | ||
Then he wouldn't have ever been replaced, I guess. | ||
We'll get back to this article. | ||
I won't spend too long on it on the Daily Dispatch, but hilarious. | ||
It's just that he's not. | ||
He's not the better candidate. | ||
He's not the best candidate. | ||
In fact, that's the wrong word. | ||
The word you're looking for is, what if Joe Biden was the not-as-terrible candidate all along? | ||
You know, best is relative. | ||
Right? | ||
Best is relative. | ||
Yeah, better than Kamala. | ||
Terrible candidate. | ||
Absolutely terrible. | ||
The only reason you think Joe Biden is a good candidate now is because he has spent the last two months sleeping on the beach and you haven't heard from him. | ||
And you are all goldfish, I guess. | ||
And forget if you're not constantly reminded how terrible your decisions are. | ||
Joe Biden was an awful candidate. | ||
And if things had continued on, it wouldn't have been the debate. | ||
It would have been some other thing that would have inspired the Democrats to frantically replace him because of how terrible he is. | ||
He was never a good candidate. | ||
He's not a good candidate. | ||
It's just Kamala is just that bad of a candidate that they're looking at the Crypt Keeper like he might have been a better option, but he's not. | ||
Meanwhile, Blinken arrives in Israel in mid-missiles in bid to revive ceasefire push. | ||
Yeah, there's no ceasefire, folks. | ||
There's no ceasefire. | ||
There never was a plan for a ceasefire. | ||
This is just a charade. | ||
They're just doing it again. | ||
He's going over to help to coordinate the imminent attack against Iran and the continuing bombardment of Lebanon, as well as the eradication of the Palestinians from Gaza and the ethnic cleansing campaign that continues there. | ||
U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has landed in Israel and bid to revive ceasefire talks to end the wars in Gaza and Lebanon. | ||
I'm sure Hamas is very excited about ceasefire talks. | ||
They'll have to find a new negotiator first, honestly. | ||
Obviously, you guys murdered the last one with a drone, so they'll have to find a new negotiator, I guess. | ||
I'm sure somebody is eager to take up that mantle. | ||
From Newsweek, how Kamala Harris and Donald Trump polls look two weeks before the election. | ||
Yes, folks, it's Tuesday, two weeks until the 2024 election. | ||
Just two weeks to go. | ||
We're down in the final hours now. | ||
Donald Trump's poll numbers have been improving, but the 2024 race against Kamala Harris is still too close to call, with two weeks remaining. | ||
The former election is now considered the slight favorite over Harris to win November's election and two major polling aggregators and forecasting models for the first time, with three recent high-quality polls showing Trump ahead nationally over Harris. | ||
And he continues in this upswing. | ||
He continues to completely dominate in the PR world, and we'll get back to that in just a second. | ||
Maybe we'll start today with more election coverage as we finish out the Daily Dispatch. | ||
But yeah, we will get back to that. | ||
that and consider the the options at play for the powers that be and you know what cards they have left in their hand to uh use to destroy america we'll get back to that finally we have this fanny willis's lover nathan wade admits to multiple white house meetings during prosecution of president trump in georgia fanny willis's special prosecutor and illicit lover | ||
nathan wade admitted he met with the biden harris white house on multiple occasions during the prosecution of Trump in the Georgia-RICO case. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll get back to that. | |
Nathan Wade arrived on Capitol Hill for an interview with the House Judiciary Committee last week. | ||
Fannie Willis sent out a letter to Chairman Jim Jordan demanding Nathan Wade's testimony be canceled. | ||
She also demanded that Wade not answer any questions. | ||
You know, because democracy. | ||
Because democracy means having the federal government and the executive branch coordinating with local special prosecutors to take out their political opponents and then denying any oversight or questions from the Congress as they carry out their illegal machinations. | ||
This is a big deal. | ||
This is actually a gigantic deal. | ||
And we have the transcripts from the interview where Nathan Wade admitted to visiting the White House many times, multiple occasions. | ||
In his professional capacity as the prosecutor that will go after their political opponent. | ||
I mean, this is like, is it? | ||
I mean, the only thing the White House had for a long time was the illusion that they weren't actively involved in the prosecutions of Donald Trump. | ||
As they constantly screech about the potentiality of Donald Trump using the executive branch to go after his political enemies, they have been coordinating and orchestrating and carrying out this massive, various sets of prosecution against him. | ||
And the one thing they had was that there was no actual admitted... | ||
Collusion between them. | ||
I mean, there was obvious collusion. | ||
There were people from the Justice Department that left their jobs specifically to go to New York to help to coordinate and carry out the prosecution against him there. | ||
There's obvious collaboration going on. | ||
It's evident for anybody to see, but it hadn't been admitted yet. | ||
So they still had the illusion. | ||
They had the illusion. | ||
They had the... | ||
How do they put it? | ||
You know, believable distance from... | ||
They had the semblance of being hands-off on all of this. | ||
But that's all over now. | ||
I mean, they're admitting. | ||
Now, Nathan Wade, the prosecutor, visited the White House multiple times, admitted that, and then refused to answer what they talked about at all. | ||
Not because he doesn't know what they talked about, because what they talked about was the prosecution of Donald Trump and how the Biden Department of Justice and executive branch were intimately involved in the entire affair. | ||
That's why. | ||
So that's why. | ||
So something has to be done about this, right? | ||
I mean, there's got to be a... | ||
Because you have to think, you know, in real terms, that there's going to be a time in the very near future, whether Kamala Harris wins or Donald Trump wins, or Donald Trump wins and is president for a little while, and then a new president... | ||
There's going to be a time in the near future where, again, the people in power in Washington, D.C., the president or the vice president or somebody in the executive branch wants to go after their political opponent by using special prosecutors or attorney generals or district attorneys, like whatever it is, to go after their political opponent. | ||
And right now, the people in those positions, the prosecutors, the whatever district attorneys, they would jump at the they jump at the possibility. | ||
They'll jump at the idea. | ||
They would happily participate in a conspiracy like that because, well, there's only good thing. | ||
You'll become a media celebrity. | ||
You'll be protected by the leftist media. | ||
The Democrats won't let anything happen to you. | ||
You'll get to be a big star. | ||
You'll get big, big stump speeches. | ||
You'll get to, as a nobody from Atlanta or whatever, you'll get to possibly wield the sword that beheads the king. | ||
I mean, that's a pretty... | ||
Pretty big deal. | ||
And then, of course, you'll be rewarded with a judgeship, or maybe you'll sit on the Supreme Court for showing how easily corruptible and controllable you are. | ||
So we need to change that. | ||
We need to change that. | ||
We need every special prosecutor and every district attorney and every attorney general all across the United States If they're ever approached in a clandestine way by the Department of Justice or the executive branch to carry out one of these democracy-destroying, nation-ending prosecutions, they need to think, gee, I would do that, but the last guy that did that died in prison. | ||
So I think I'll pass. | ||
Thank you very much. | ||
The risk is just not worth it. | ||
So right now the balance scale is very much on the side of, yes, let's just... | ||
Prosecute our enemies. | ||
Let's be corrupt. | ||
Let's carry out these extrajudicial prosecutions at the behest of the executive branch. | ||
It's basically like they have no incentive to not do that. | ||
All of the incentive is on the be corrupt side. | ||
So to counterbalance that, to provide a counterweight for all of the benefits that you would get for going along with this corruption, the punishment has to be severe. | ||
These people have to think, if I do this, there's a possibility that I'm lauded and celebrated and we get away with it and I'm laureled and celebrated and I have a triumphal march through Washington, D.C. as the savior of democracy for taking down Big Bad Orange Man or I might end up In shackles, | ||
wearing an orange jumpsuit, humiliated in front of everybody, when I'm trotted out in front of the cameras as an example, as an example to the American people that the American government is still functional, that we don't countenance corruption at this level, only to be then led off into the steel cage where I'm made somebody's bitch forever until I die. | ||
That needs to be the... | ||
The future at stake for these people. | ||
So, Nathan Wade, Fannie Willis, and whoever they were meeting with in the White House need to be humiliated in front of everybody. | ||
As an example of what happens when you have the executive branch in this country trying to use the judicial system to abuse it, distort, and effectively destroy it in their Political games they're playing, this can't stand. | ||
An example must be made. | ||
We will get back into this story here of Nathan Wade and Fannie Willis, but the details aren't important. | ||
The intricacies are beside the point. | ||
It's very clear and now admitted out of their own mouths, under oath. | ||
They coordinated with the White House to go after Donald Trump. | ||
The cases being carried out against Donald Trump are, without reservation and without caveat, the exact thing that they are crying about possibly happening with Donald Trump. | ||
There's no light between Fannie Willis and the Biden executive branch. | ||
The charade, the ridiculous, obviously false claim that the Biden executive branch was totally... | ||
Out of the loop? | ||
We don't know anything about that. | ||
Hey, that's them over there. | ||
Don't bring that over here. | ||
We're the Democrats. | ||
We would never use our political power to untoward means, to progress our own side politically in defiance of the actual laws that are on them. | ||
But never us. | ||
We, the executive branch of the United States government, the deep state, we would never. | ||
So they can... | ||
They can stop saying that now. | ||
We get it. | ||
It's out in the open. | ||
Everybody admits it. | ||
They admit it. | ||
And then they say, oh, but I don't remember what we talked about. | ||
No, I just went to the White House like 10 times, but I don't know what we... | ||
I don't remember what we talked about. | ||
Throw him in prison. | ||
unidentified
|
This is just enough, enough, enough, enough, enough, enough, enough. | |
Throw him in prison. | ||
And of course, the great irony of this... | ||
It's just how frantically the Democrats are still, to this day, pushing the lie that Donald Trump is doing all the things that they are actually doing. | ||
And I actually made the mistake. | ||
I'll tell you the bizarre circumstances that led to this strange event for me. | ||
I was going to pick up my son yesterday, driving around, and I happened to let my phone die. | ||
My phone died. | ||
And so for the first time in a long time, I decided to listen to NBR. I decided to listen to NPR. So yes, yesterday I was listening to NPR, but as I explained, it was extenuating circumstances and there was little else I could do, but I did do it. | ||
I admit. | ||
And of course, you know, I mean, it's almost, it could be a game. | ||
It could be like a bingo game where it's like, Nothing that comes out of NPR, all things considered, is even remotely newsworthy or accurate. | ||
It is legitimately crazy. | ||
And it's crazy. | ||
A lot of people are getting on them Rightfully so, but it's a constant thing. | ||
But recently with the, you know, right when Hurricane Helene hit and everything was destroyed and there's just, you know, tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of Americans without power, without communications, no roads to get to them, just like absolute tragedy. | ||
You turn on NPR News and they're talking about some drought in the Sudan. | ||
What the hell is this? | ||
They don't even mention what's going on in America. | ||
They talk about some country in Africa that's been in civil war for God knows how long. | ||
They're still killing each other and starving each other. | ||
And that's what we're talking about. | ||
That's really where we're going with this. | ||
Maybe we'll give out a prize. | ||
It'll be like $100 to the first person who can record NPR for more than 10 minutes without hearing some sort of leftist propaganda and or race baiting. | ||
It's all they do. | ||
It's all they ever do. | ||
And so the story last night was about Donald Trump and his hatred of the news media and I thought I had this. | ||
Maybe it's in the stack of news, guys. | ||
So maybe it needs to be printed out here. | ||
Maybe I deleted it by accident. | ||
But I can actually quote it to you. | ||
But I can just go off my memory as well. | ||
Because essentially what it was saying, is it in this stack somewhere? | ||
Maybe? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
While we have this, while we're talking about it, Warden admits Biden-Harris DOJ has illegally imprisoned Steve Bannon since October 19th. | ||
The Tennessee Star on Monday obtained a letter by the Bureau of Prisons to attorneys representing Steve Bannon, wherein the federal agency acknowledged it is holding the former White House Chief Strategist in violation of the First Step Act of 2018 as Bannon accrued 10 days of good time credit towards an early release. | ||
So he should have been released, according to the First Step Act. | ||
But he never should have been in prison in the first place, according to the First Amendment and the Constitution. | ||
So... | ||
Like, they're just doing it. | ||
You get that they're just doing it. | ||
They're just the executive branch is coordinating with local prosecutors to try to imprison their political opponents. | ||
Total violation of every law statute as well as just moral framework that we have. | ||
They are imprisoning political activists, talk show hosts illegally in violation of everything America is supposed to be about. | ||
Like they're just doing it. | ||
They are imprisoning their political opponents like communists. | ||
Like they're fascists. | ||
Like what they are. | ||
Tyrants. | ||
They're tyrants. | ||
It's very simple. | ||
The ideology is sort of secondary to the fact that they are horrifically tyrannical and only getting worse. | ||
And only going to get worse if nothing is done about this. | ||
Completely insane. | ||
So that just happens to be another story there that aligns with what I'm talking about. | ||
But the story from NPR News... | ||
What is the classic... | ||
There's some phrase, like, they'll tell you what happened to them, but they won't tell you why. | ||
That's like NPR. That's the totality of NPR. Where they're talking about Trump's threats against the media. | ||
And they never bring up why he's making threats, if that's what he's doing. | ||
When he's talking about CBS should have their news license revoked. | ||
He's like, they're licensed... | ||
And the license is based on their honesty, and if they're not honest, they should have the license revoked. | ||
And they'll tell you this. | ||
Could Trump's threats against news outlets carry weight if he wins the presidency? | ||
I'll get back to it on the other side. | ||
We'll get into this. | ||
because I was raging in the car listening to this from NPR because, of course, they do it in the way that they do with the soft voice pretending to be unbiased while they just spread blatant, ridiculous propaganda. | ||
Never telling you that anything about, you know, the reason Trump would say something about CBS, which is that 60 Minutes deliberately, explicitly, and blatantly edited an answer in an attempt to, influence the presidential election. | ||
Paul Harris had a bad answer, so they deleted it and put in a different answer for her. | ||
So, yeah, remove their license. | ||
All right, welcome back, folks. - This is the American Journal. | ||
Infowars.com, band.video. | ||
Go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Go to TheAlexJonesStore.com to support us in everything that we do. | ||
Get yourself some Optimal Human, the incredible Complete Nutrient. | ||
It's a complete nutritional supplement mixed in with a smoothie or water. | ||
It tastes a little bit like black tea, but it's got everything you need. | ||
I mean, you could... | ||
I don't recommend this. | ||
At all, but you could potentially eat nothing but cardboard and take Optimal Human and still have all of the daily nutrients and vitamins and minerals that you need. | ||
It's just that powerful. | ||
So, no matter how, like if you're a very healthy person, you eat healthily, you take care of yourself, you buy organic and avoid pesticides, well, get Optimal Human to just super power and turbo charge your health. | ||
Or if you're maybe not the most disciplined, like myself, I hate to admit, get Optimal Human to make up for your propensity to eat things that are sweet and salty and delicious like I do. | ||
So no matter who you are or where you are at your health goals, Optimal Human can help you get there. | ||
Go now to thealexjonesstore.com and get yourself some Optimal Human. | ||
And while you're there, sign up to be a part of the Alex Jones VIP membership and you get actually a lot of money to spend on the store. | ||
You actually get more money in store credits than you do for the cost of the VIP membership. | ||
So go now to thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. And by the way, Optimal Human does have a no-questions-asked return policy. | ||
So if you get Optimal Human and don't like it, which frankly ain't gonna happen because it's fantastic stuff, but if for some reason you happen not to like it, you can return it. | ||
It really is no risk for you. | ||
No risk. | ||
All benefit. | ||
Go to infowarsstore.com and thealexjonesstore.com today. | ||
So let's keep talking about politics, and in particular, we are two weeks away from the election, and already it's pretty clear that they're going to steal it, that they're absolutely going to steal the election. | ||
They're already trying to. | ||
They already have things in place. | ||
And of course, ironically or typically, predictably, they're claiming, Obama came out and said, we know Trump is going to steal the election. | ||
What? | ||
How? | ||
What are you talking about? | ||
It's one of the things I struggle with, this whole situation, is like, these people just lie and project, but just in the most blatant, absurd way, to where you almost feel like a sucker just responding to their lie. | ||
I'm trying, it's like exhausting. | ||
It's just annoying. | ||
It really is just frustrating. | ||
The alacrity with which they will lie, the ease with which they, with no sense of irony, go from telling you that Voter fraud doesn't exist. | ||
The whole thing's a conspiracy theory. | ||
You're spreading disinformation and should probably be charged and sent to prison for saying such a thing. | ||
But also, Trump might steal the election. | ||
And there's no conscious awareness that they're contradicting themselves. | ||
There's no shame felt at the hypocrisy. | ||
They just lie. | ||
And so you're stuck here going, now wait, do we need to point this out? | ||
Is it worth it to even try to explain why what they're saying is a lie? | ||
Because my instinct is just to laugh at them, dismiss them, ignore it. | ||
But then it's like, but are other people falling for this? | ||
I mean, is the wider American public able to see through this? | ||
I mean, they should be able to. | ||
Maybe the perfect example is when I'm I'm talking about with the NPR story. | ||
Could Trump's threats against news outlets carry weight if he wins the presidency? | ||
Now this type of propaganda really only works on low IQ people. | ||
I should have just gotten the audio to play it for you, but I'm not going to do that to you. | ||
I understand that the reason our audience listens to Infowars is particularly because we are not NPR, so I don't want to put NPR audio on the airwaves. | ||
We don't need to double up that trash. | ||
So I guess I'll just read it. | ||
It says, Trump is threatened on the campaign trail to jail reporters who won't give up sources of leaks and to strip networks of their licenses for fact-checking him and for other unfavorable coverage. | ||
Okay? | ||
So you have to... | ||
You have to ask what you're not hearing. | ||
And this is where the low IQ, high IQ thing comes into place. | ||
If you are just sitting back and like a dummy absorbing this and just taking it uncritically, then yeah, I understand why you would think Trump is an insane tyrant if this was true. | ||
If he's talking about pulling the license of established, you know, centuries-old news organizations Because they fact check him? | ||
That's crazy. | ||
That would be crazy. | ||
That's not what's happening, obviously. | ||
But that would be crazy. | ||
And if you just accepted this unquestionably, yeah, you'd think he's crazy. | ||
You'd think he's dangerous. | ||
He wants to remove the license from news outlets because they fact check him or for other unfavorable coverage? | ||
That would be crazy. | ||
But does anybody bother to ask the question, what unfavorable coverage? | ||
What exactly they consider fact-checking? | ||
What Trump is even complaining about? | ||
Like, they never mention that. | ||
They never say what it is that Trump is mad about in the particular clips that they play. | ||
Because they'll play a clip of Trump saying, you know, these guys, they have these licenses. | ||
It's based on them being truthful. | ||
And if they're not true, we need to take their... | ||
Maybe we'll take their license. | ||
And then they frame this as a First Amendment situation. | ||
I... Are we licensed? | ||
Is Infowars a license? | ||
I don't think we're licensed. | ||
Nobody's licensed. | ||
There's even the concept of being licensed. | ||
I'll tell you what they say, and you tell me if you can tell that you're missing some pieces here. | ||
This is IQ. This is how it works. | ||
It's pattern recognition and it's being able to know things without being told them. | ||
If you're shown a series of images and one of them is missing, you should be able to fill in what should fit in the series. | ||
If you have a little cartoon picture of a little rabbit carrying a cake... | ||
And then he's carrying a cake running, and then there's a missing picture, and then he's crying and the cake is on the ground. | ||
You can assume that the middle picture there is him tripping or falling, dropping the cake, right? | ||
This is literally what IQ is, and people with low IQ can't fill it in. | ||
It's crazy. | ||
I know I'm trying to explain this. | ||
If you're listening to this, you're probably high IQ, so you don't need to have it explained. | ||
But this beggar begs an explanation for how they get away with this. | ||
Former President Trump loves attention from the press, they say, but he also expresses a lot of contempt towards the press, as he did during a recent interview with Bloomberg News. | ||
They quote him saying, what is the Wall Street Journal? | ||
They've been wrong about everything, so have you, by the way. | ||
On the campaign trail, Trump has suggested that if he regains the White House, he will exact vengeance on news outlets that anger him. | ||
Exact vengeance on news outlets that anger him. | ||
A stark violation of First Amendment principles. | ||
NPR's Dave Fulkin Flick reports that the comments come at a time of heightened concern about Trump's more autocratic impulses. | ||
So this is just... | ||
unidentified
|
What First Amendment principles are they talking about? | |
We'll get to that. | ||
We will get to that. | ||
Yeah, they talk about First Amendment principles as if he is advocating censorship, which he's obviously not. | ||
The left is. | ||
And again, we've been through this over and over. | ||
I mean, this is just who they are. | ||
This is what they do, right? | ||
When we talked extensively about Elon Musk and how the left is infuriated that Elon Musk is basically a Trump partisan. | ||
I mean, he is. | ||
He's a Trump partisan at this point. | ||
And they're outraged by this, and they pretend it's hypocrisy for right-wingers to celebrate Elon Musk being a right-winger. | ||
But Elon Musk doesn't censor left-wingers. | ||
So Elon Musk, Jack Dorsey, and these others, they pretend to be nonpartisan. | ||
They pretend to be bipartisan. | ||
They put on that act while funneling hundreds of millions of dollars exclusively to Democratic charities or organizations. | ||
And then they censor right-wingers on their platform blatantly, egregiously, through algorithms, totally crush them, shut them down, get them imprisoned. | ||
You see these are two conflicting spheres. | ||
It's a Venn diagram that doesn't overlap at all. | ||
One side is corrupt, is willing and eager to use their power to violate the principles of the First Amendment, to shut down your speech, to impose censorship. | ||
While playing the part of just a truth-teller, just a nonpartisan, just trying to stop hate speech and disinformation. | ||
The other side is just like, yeah, I'm a right-winger. | ||
I love Trump. | ||
We need freedom. | ||
We need First Amendment. | ||
And then they let leftists say whatever the hell they want. | ||
Never censor. | ||
Don't cooperate with the government. | ||
Shut down dissidents. | ||
It's a stark comparison. | ||
So you've got Donald Trump, who was censored, who has been censored. | ||
Massively. | ||
He was kicked off of every social media platform on January 6th. | ||
And not allowed on until Elon Musk purchased X and let him back on. | ||
Don Trump didn't send anybody to jail. | ||
That didn't deserve it. | ||
They're trying to send him to jail. | ||
It's just absolutely everything they say. | ||
It's exactly what they do. | ||
Is it vengeance? | ||
Is he exacting vengeance? | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
Obviously not. | ||
On outlets that anger him? | ||
Again, if you just read this and just absorb it for what it is, you get this impression that, you know, Trump just sees some 60 Minutes report about how soybeans are grown, and he just doesn't like the tone of voice. | ||
So he's just like, we have to shut it down. | ||
Her voice is too squeaky. | ||
Like, it's just that there's insaneocratic impulses, like even using the word impulses. | ||
Like, he's not even in charge of his own thoughts. | ||
He just has these impulses that he just... | ||
Goes with and just wants to shut down media outlets because they've made him angry. | ||
It's this caricature that is completely divorced from reality. | ||
But it's easy to maintain that illusion when you never even address what the reason is that he's saying any of these things. | ||
But they go on. | ||
They say it's not subtle. | ||
It's not isolated. | ||
It's not off the cuff. | ||
Last year, Trump called for NBC to lose its license over coverage of criminal charges he's facing. | ||
In August, after the debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, it was NBC's turn, or ABC's turn. | ||
Trump saying, I think ABC took a big hit last night. | ||
The network's moderators had fact-checked Trump several times. | ||
He popped up on Fox& Friends with a warning for ABC. Trump saying, I mean, to be honest, there are news organizations. | ||
They have to be licensed to do it. | ||
They ought to take away their license for the way that they did that. | ||
Did what, though? | ||
What is he talking about? | ||
What did they do? | ||
They don't tell you. | ||
They don't tell you. | ||
We don't know. | ||
I mean, this is what I mean by being able to see this. | ||
Anybody listening to this should go, but they didn't. | ||
But what happened, though? | ||
But where is the story? | ||
Because the story is, specifically with CBS, again, I don't even know what the context is that he's talking about ABC. What is he talking about? | ||
You know, what they're doing, that they're doing. | ||
Did they lie? | ||
Did they dishonestly frame something? | ||
What is his outrage over? | ||
By leaving it blank, they are insinuating that's just because he got fact-checked. | ||
That he lied, and ABC called him on it, so now he wants to shut them down. | ||
That's the image they paint in their mind. | ||
They never actually say that verbatim. | ||
That's just the impression that they're giving you. | ||
By the usage of their words, by very carefully sticking to what is technically the truth, they're able to leave you believing this absurd story that Trump was just like, the sky is red, and they're like, actually, it's blue. | ||
He's like, I'm going to shut you down! | ||
This is absurd, but this is how they put it. | ||
Now, with... | ||
CBS. Here's the way they frame this. | ||
That's actually not quite how it works, but this month he's back at it. | ||
Slamming CBS over the vice presidential debate and the network's interview of Harris. | ||
Here was Trump in Colorado. | ||
And it's a sound bite of Trump saying, think of this. | ||
So CBS gets a license, and the license is based on honesty. | ||
I think they have to take their license away. | ||
Why, though? | ||
But why? | ||
unidentified
|
Why? | |
I'm trying to impress fully on the audience what actually happened here. | ||
The actual series of events is that CBS News, 60 Minutes, did an interview with Kamala Harris. | ||
They aired a live version of it. | ||
On TV to millions of people, in which Kamala Harris was asked a very simple question, completely bungled the answer, made no sense, rambled, just ridiculous word salad nonsense. | ||
And then when CBS and 60 Minutes uploaded that same interview online, they changed her answer. | ||
Same question is asked. | ||
And the answer that is given is a completely different answer. | ||
Edited, chopped up, taken from somewhere else. | ||
We don't know. | ||
We don't know. | ||
You would think that would be a story. | ||
You would think that would be a scandal that NPR would cover. | ||
But this is what they do. | ||
They ignore the actual problem, the actual scandal, the fact that a long-established and highly regarded news magazine like 60 Minutes, CBS News, a flagship show, For old mainstream big network media. | ||
Deliberately, blatantly, egregiously, in front of everybody, changed the answer of a political candidate completely. | ||
Not just took out a word or two, that would be bad enough. | ||
On one interview, it was one answer. | ||
In another interview, it was a completely different answer. | ||
No explanation. | ||
No justification. | ||
No, well, some of her answers were cut to fit the airtime. | ||
No, none of that. | ||
They changed it, and now they're refusing to give out the transcript, refusing to say which answer was the actual answer. | ||
Just total violation of trust. | ||
Totally opening the door for... | ||
We have no idea. | ||
I mean, what would happen if they sit there and go, they interview Donald Trump, and they ask him one question where they're like, if a cheater was ever found at your casino, what would you do? | ||
And he sits there going, oh, well, you'd take him out and you'd forcibly kick him out. | ||
I'd send my security to grab him and Throw him on the curb. | ||
And then they ask, okay, what would you do if you met Hillary Clinton? | ||
And then they take the answer from the casino question and put it on the Hillary Clinton question and have it look like he's saying he wants Secret Service to stomp Hillary's face into the curb. | ||
And it's like, and this is just a random, obvious, over-the-top example. | ||
This is the point, right? | ||
Is that once you allow a news network to get away with asking one question and then cutting in the answer from a different question to that first... | ||
I mean, that is an insane thing for CBS News to do. | ||
It's an insane thing for 60 Minutes to do. | ||
It's insane that they did it Really blatantly in front of everybody where they aired one version and then aired another and refused to acknowledge that it was happening and refused to put out the transcript. | ||
That should be the story on NPR. That should be the story. | ||
If anything, it should be a big story about how this happened, how this decision was made, how it was discovered, why this is dangerous for the actual expression of the First Amendment, your actual ability to trust the news media, the crisis of trust that they're always talking about. | ||
That should be the story and if anything, Trump's comments should just be like a note in the rest of the story. | ||
There should be comments from a lot of people about how outrageous this is. | ||
Here's the scandal. | ||
Here's what happened. | ||
Here's what CBS knew. | ||
Total violation. | ||
Total fraud. | ||
They committed fraud in front of the whole world in an effort specifically to sway an election to alter the outcome of the 2024 presidential race. | ||
So total violation of election integrity. | ||
Total corruption from the news media. | ||
How did this happen? | ||
How was this choice made? | ||
How did this either slip through the cracks or be deliberately covered up? | ||
And then like maybe in the story you go, and here's what Trump had to say about it. | ||
Here's what this other person had to say about it. | ||
Because anybody that cares about legitimate media in this country should be outraged at what CBS and 60 Minutes did. | ||
And by the way, they did it again like the next day when they interviewed Mike Johnson and cut out his answer. | ||
He gave like a minute long answer and they cut out 45 seconds of it and only put in 15 seconds. | ||
They didn't tell you they did that. | ||
They didn't tell you, by the way, we cut out some of the Speaker of the House's response. | ||
The only reason we know about it is because Mike Johnson thought they might do that and recorded the interview himself. | ||
We showed the video where he's on his cell phone camera with a long, extended, thorough answer where he's talking about the hurricane response. | ||
He's talking about the lack of FEMA response. | ||
He's talking about the fact there's no boots on the ground there. | ||
They cut all of that out, put only 15 seconds to the end of his response, Never said they did that and edited it to disguise that. | ||
Edited it in a way that it wasn't obvious that it was cut. | ||
It didn't jump where you go, okay, they must have cut something out there. | ||
No, they portrayed it. | ||
They aired it as if it was a live interview where you were hearing his full answer. | ||
Why shouldn't they have their license taken away doing stuff like that? | ||
Why would anybody appear on them ever again if that's what they do? | ||
They'll sit there and record an answer, record a conversation with you in good faith, And then edit your answer to make it sound like you said something you didn't say. | ||
What the hell? | ||
This is CBS News. | ||
And that's not the main story. | ||
The main story is Trump mad at this and that's bad and that makes him an authoritarian. | ||
unidentified
|
I love how NPR decided to say that Trump violated the principles of the First Amendment when really 60 Minutes violated the principles of journalism, right? | |
There aren't principles of free speech that Trump violated, right? | ||
Right. | ||
Well, and it's... | ||
Again, it's just ridiculous where you've got these same people, the leftists, who when Alex Jones gets kicked off of every social media platform simultaneously in a deliberate attempt to destroy Infowars, thinking they could cut us off from our audience, cut us off from our income deliberately, like on purpose, try to destroy us in a coordinated fashion with every social media, every big tech company, including Apple, including Google, all kicking us off on exactly the same day at exactly the same time. | ||
And they coordinated the biggest act against the First Amendment and the principles thereof ever in the history of this country. | ||
And they say, well, but you have freedom of speech, but we aren't obligated to give you a platform, right? | ||
When it comes to the First Amendment on their side, it's like, well, as long as we aren't actively duct taping your face and silencing you that way, then the First Amendment hasn't been violated. | ||
We can... | ||
We can, you know, advocate for Amazon to not carry your book. | ||
We can send our ground forces, Antifa, to disrupt any live event you might be having so you're not able to talk anyway, you know, even just in front of a crowd of people. | ||
They despise the First Amendment. | ||
But when Donald Trump is like, hey, CBS just deliberately edited... | ||
And completely falsified an answer for Kamala Harris to make her look better. | ||
Maybe they should have their license taken away. | ||
There's nothing about the First Amendment even remotely violated there. | ||
Nothing even close. | ||
This is what I'm saying. | ||
How exhausting is it to have to talk about the First Amendment with people who... | ||
As of last week, we're saying the First Amendment is an impediment to our total control. | ||
Who just don't care about the First Amendment. | ||
I mean, why do we even let them invoke things like that? | ||
But people fall for it. | ||
So again, the point of this, and it just goes on and on. | ||
If we had even a remotely honest media in this country, especially the one that's funded by our taxpayer dollars for what is supposed to be legally, like lawfully, it has to be an unbiased organization. | ||
It's not clearly even remotely. | ||
But if they had just a... | ||
They accidentally swallowed some honesty. | ||
If they somehow, accidentally, by some happenstance, happened to have some tiny modicum of honesty in them, then the story would be about CBS News blatantly editing the answers of politicians to falsify their responses and trick the American people. | ||
That would be the scandal. | ||
Instead, they want you to think it's a scandal that Trump talked about it. | ||
The scandal to them, and then the proof that Trump is an authoritarian, anti-free speech monster. | ||
He's just running on impulse. | ||
He's just an animal. | ||
They can't think for himself. | ||
That's the story they want to tell you. | ||
And they're trusting that you're dumb enough that you can hear Trump say something like, I can't believe they did this. | ||
They have to get their license taken away. | ||
And they expect you to not ask the question, what does he mean by this? | ||
No, but what is he talking about? | ||
Because the whole story wouldn't make a lot of sense if they mention that. | ||
If they happen to provide the context of why Trump is saying CBS is dishonest, they happen to say, the reason Trump is saying this is because CBS News cut out a response from Mike Johnson, Speaker of the House, and refused to air it, airing only a 10 second out of the minute long response. | ||
And they completely changed the response from Kamala Harris in order to falsify her answer to the question. | ||
And everybody listening would go, well, what the hell? | ||
They should have their license taken away. | ||
Trump is right. | ||
But you have to have the intelligence to see what they aren't telling you. | ||
Hello, everybody, and thank you for tuning in to the weekly report. | ||
Why should we fight wars for Ukraine and Israel? | ||
When you take on the role of the world's policeman, don't be surprised when the countries who cannot fight their own wars calls 911. | ||
That is exactly what is happening to the United States on two fronts, and it is bankrupting our country, depleting the military that should serve our own national interests, and threatening to drag the U.S. into World War III. Last week, Ukraine's President Vladimir Zelensky publicly presented his victory plan. | ||
It was delusional. | ||
Immediate NATO membership for Ukraine. | ||
NATO strikes against incoming Russian missiles and permission to use Western long-range missiles for strikes deep into Russia, including Moscow and St. | ||
Petersburg. | ||
The real intent was not hard to understand. | ||
Ukraine is on the verge of losing its war with Russia and is desperate to draw the United States military into the fight. | ||
There were numerous opportunities to avoid this bloody war, but at every step, the Ukrainian leadership listened to Western neocons like Boris Johnson and decided to keep fighting Russia down to the last Ukrainian. | ||
But now that they are nearly down to the last Ukrainian, they are calling on us to step in and fight the country with the most nuclear weapons on Earth, Russia, in a battle that could not be more unrelated to our actual interests. | ||
Washington's answer should be simply but firm. | ||
No more weapons. | ||
No more money. | ||
You're on your own. | ||
Make peace. | ||
Would the U.S. be mortally wounded if the people in eastern Ukraine were allowed to secede from Kyiv and join Russia? | ||
Would anyone except the Russian-obsessed neocons in D.C. think tanks even notice? | ||
Likewise with Israel. | ||
Tel Aviv has, in response to the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack, launched a war to annihilate Palestinians from Gaza, invade and occupy southern Lebanon, and degrade the military of Iraq and Syria, and take on Iran. | ||
But the Israeli military has nowhere near the capacity to fight so many wars on so many fronts, so it has increasingly demanded U.S. involvement in the conflicts. | ||
Already, the U.S. has provided some $23 billion in additional military aid to Israel and has employed U.S. military assets in the region to shoot down missiles and provide increased weapons and intelligence. | ||
But it's still not enough for Israel. | ||
To fight Iran with its significant military capabilities, Israel appears desperate to drag the U.S. military into the battle. | ||
The stationing of one or perhaps two THAAD air defense systems, each with 100 U.S. troops to operate them, is part of that effort. | ||
These 1 to 200 US troops are illegally engaged in combat. | ||
But what's worse is that they are being used as a tripwire. | ||
US and Israeli leaders understand that they will be considered legitimate targets for any additional Iranian missile attack. | ||
But as soon as American troops start getting killed in Israel, there will be a massive push for further U.S. involvement. | ||
Imagine the mainstream media war propaganda if such a terrible thing happens. | ||
That is no way to use members of the U.S. Armed Services. | ||
It is the opposite of supporting our troops. | ||
Washington's response to Israel trying to drag us into its war with Iran should be just like with Ukraine. | ||
No more weapons, no more money. | ||
You're on your own. | ||
Make peace. | ||
That is what a pro-American foreign policy looks like. | ||
Our founders understood it very well and wrote about it often. | ||
It's called nonintervention. | ||
Thanks for listening. | ||
The great Ron Paul there talking about just two of the conflicts that America is embroiled in against its own national interest and the will of its people. | ||
The media is very good at organizing manufactured consent for wars that they want to go on forever, aren't they? | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. - This is the American Journal. | |
Second hour is on. | ||
And we are going to talk quite a bit about the wars. | ||
The wars America is involved in, Ukraine and Israel. | ||
We'll get to that in just a second, but I haven't played any videos yet, except for, of course, the ones you see in the first five minutes, that statement from Ron Paul, as always, upholding his principled stance of non-intervention, which if we'd only listened to 40 years ago, we wouldn't be in the situation we're in now. | ||
It's never too late to start, folks. | ||
But I have a lot of videos in the political realm that are very, very illuminating. | ||
So let's stick with American politics for a little while. | ||
Still a lot to talk about, even just to close out the discussion of free speech and NPR news being outraged that Trump would dare to talk about How dishonest the mainstream media is. | ||
From Gateway Pundit, CBS must get the transcript out now. | ||
Trump reacts to a 60-minute statement claiming innocence for editing Kamala's nonsensical answer with previous soundbite. | ||
Says litigation has already started. | ||
President Trump slammed CBS's news organization on Monday after they claimed innocence in a Sunday statement for cutting Kamala Harris's answer to a 60-minute interview question and replacing it with a completely different soundbite from a different part of the interview. | ||
Two weeks after they were caught editing Harris's responses to mislead the public into thinking she's not intellectually challenged, CBS released a contemptuous statement claiming they did nothing wrong and attacking Trump for not participating in their unfair interviews. | ||
Recall Trump's previous interview with 60 Minutes when leftist crank Leslie Stahl lectured President Trump and told her audience that Barack Obama never spied on his campaign. | ||
Of course, they were... | ||
Knowingly wrong. | ||
I mean, that's the thing. | ||
They're not just wrong. | ||
That can be understandable. | ||
They are deliberately obfuscating reality. | ||
They're deliberately lying. | ||
But I guess that's fine. | ||
I guess that's fine. | ||
I mean, Infowars is having to be shut down. | ||
You know, we've been sued and dragged over the coals, and it's cost us God only knows how many millions of dollars to defend ourselves against lawfare that the leftists cheer on, celebrate, laugh at. | ||
And maybe it's time for them to see what it feels like. | ||
I think it's time for them to see if they could stand up against the withering fire. | ||
I don't think so. | ||
I don't think they would. | ||
But a lot of... | ||
unidentified
|
Let's just say this. | |
Kamala Harris, not great off the cuff. | ||
Not great on the cuff. | ||
Not great regardless of position relative to cuffs. | ||
She can't perform when it's scripted. | ||
She can't perform whatsoever when unscripted. | ||
But most illuminating of all is the times where she is surprised by And has to react to it just immediately without even having the time to, you know, condescendingly sigh before rattling off something like Joe Biden has the experience to do what he's done. | ||
Wow, incredible. | ||
At her rally, somebody unexpectedly, a heckler, yelled, Jesus is Lord. | ||
And without missing a beat, without having time to think about it, she reflexively said, Responded, you're at the wrong rally. | ||
You're at the wrong rally? | ||
unidentified
|
The guy who said Jesus is Lord. | |
What does that mean? | ||
And remember, she refused to go to the Al Smith dinner, supposedly. | ||
The rumor is that after Trump totally killed it at the Al Smith dinner, this big Catholic charity dinner, and Kamala Harris put in this just utterly cringeworthy, just embarrassing skit, the rumor was that she was Screaming at her staff and blaming one campaign director in particular who had convinced her not to go to the Al Smith dinner. | ||
Why? | ||
Because she didn't want to be seen as, quote, cozying up to the Catholics. | ||
God forbid, right? | ||
Because then she might drive away the trans vote. | ||
You know, the trans population? | ||
The 0.02% of the population? | ||
That is mentally ill with body dysmorphia, dysphoria, whatever they're calling it these days. | ||
You don't want to drive them away, so you better just hate Catholics. | ||
Not a lot of them, right? | ||
Not a big Catholic contingency in America, is there? | ||
This is how stupid these people are. | ||
This is how hateful these people are. | ||
So she refuses to go to the Al Smith dinner because she hates Catholics, because their campaign does not want the support of Catholics. | ||
They don't even want to be seen as, you know, potentially cozying up to Catholics, which is even more intense, right? | ||
It's not just that they don't want to serve Catholic interests. | ||
It's like they don't even want to be associated with Catholics. | ||
Now, that could be a response to the terrorism of the left, that, you know, left-wing transgender, you know, school shooter types have. | ||
Do genuinely despise Catholics and Christians and will make a big fuss and cause a lot of problems if you're shown to care about God or, you know, the infinite or the purpose of life. | ||
They don't want you thinking about that sort of stuff. | ||
So, you know, maybe it is just like they're like, hey, look, we even remotely move toward, what does it say? | ||
Harris makes pitch to black churches after telling protesters praising Jesus, you're at the wrong rally. | ||
But again, she didn't have time to think about it. | ||
She didn't take a moment to say, to think, oh gee, there's a lot of Christians in this country and some of them are probably my supporters. | ||
No, they want you to know. | ||
You think Jesus is Lord. | ||
You don't belong at a Kamala Harris rally. | ||
If you're a Catholic, she doesn't want anything to do with you. | ||
She's not going to the Al Smith dinner. | ||
She don't want to cozy up to you. | ||
If you're at the rally, you think Jesus is Lord, that's the wrong rally for you. | ||
They're there to talk about abortion and promiscuity and hating white people. | ||
It's not about universal love or the brothership of man. | ||
No. | ||
Take that Christianity crap and get out of here. | ||
That was her immediate, reflexive, non-considered response when she heard somebody at her rally shout, Jesus is king. | ||
J.D. Vance also found himself speaking extemporaneously when somebody in the audience shouted, Jesus is king. | ||
Let's see what he responded. | ||
Clip number five. | ||
unidentified
|
Anti-Christian rhetoric and anti-Christian approach to public policy. | |
I don't think that we've... | ||
That's right. | ||
Jesus is king. | ||
And I don't think that we've seen anything like this in modern American politics. | ||
Thanks. | ||
Thank you. | ||
You know, of course we haven't. | ||
Because what you're talking about there is the anti-Christian rhetoric. | ||
And it's, you know, people used to mock. | ||
I used to think it was funny, right? | ||
Back when I was in high school and like watched The Daily Show. | ||
And it's like the war on, yeah, sure, war on Christmas. | ||
Yeah, right. | ||
I'm sure Starbucks is waging war on Santa Claus. | ||
It kind of sounds ridiculous. | ||
What you need to realize, it wasn't a war on Christmas. | ||
It was the Battle of Christmas, representing one on innumerable fronts on the war against Christianity. | ||
And that's what it is, and they're basically open with it now. | ||
I mean, these are just two examples from the last month, but they are innumerable. | ||
I mean, they want Christian morality and Christian dogma labeled hate speech. | ||
Very literally. | ||
Okay? | ||
They will, they're setting up a system in which you could be arrested and charged for quoting the Bible. | ||
Remember the anti-Semitism bill. | ||
Because if you say that the Jews killed Jesus, and that's what it says in the Bible, then you're an anti-Semite and there are laws to prevent you from speaking. | ||
So it's, they like actually hate Christians. | ||
They actually, they don't want Christian support. | ||
They don't believe in Christian ideals. | ||
They don't think Jesus is king. | ||
They don't think Jesus is God. | ||
they're anti-christian they're anti-christian They're non-Christian. | ||
Just want to make that clear. | ||
Christianity doesn't... | ||
It's obvious from the beginning because Christianity just opposes everything that they're all about. | ||
Christianity is humble. | ||
Christianity is self-effacing. | ||
It's self-sacrificial. | ||
unidentified
|
It's... | |
Also something you can't force, right? | ||
And that's where liberty and Christianity are really deeply intertwined, is this sort of like metaphysical underpinning that like, I cannot force you to be Christian. | ||
No matter what I do, no matter how hard I can't force you to be Christian. | ||
Because in the Christian beliefs, and according to Jesus himself, in very certain terms, there's no ambiguity here. | ||
You have to actually believe it. | ||
You have to actually be honest about it. | ||
So I can put a gun to your head and say, I love Jesus, but I'm a Christian. | ||
And I can force you to say that. | ||
It doesn't mean anything in Christian dogma. | ||
It doesn't mean anything in the philosophy of Christianity unless you actually believe it, unless you sincerely embody it, unless you, you know, you can't. | ||
People have this idea that you just like if you're, especially Catholics kind of have this problem where it's like, That's why all mobsters are Catholic. | ||
They'll just kill somebody and then go confess. | ||
And they're like, oh, but I confess, so my sins are washed away. | ||
It's not really how it works. | ||
You have to actually sincerely repent. | ||
Jesus said that. | ||
It's very clear. | ||
It's very clear. | ||
It doesn't matter what you say or what you pretend to do. | ||
I mean, this is the whole thing. | ||
And this was a conflict that Jesus had with the Jews of his time, where they would perform these rituals and just think, okay, because I performed the ritual, because I did the right thing, because I slaughtered the lamb, I'm now forgiven. | ||
But they had no repentance. | ||
They didn't actually feel bad about the sins they committed. | ||
Because they did the thing. | ||
And Jesus came and was like, it doesn't matter. | ||
If you do the thing, it's better to actually sincerely repent and not do the thing than it is to do the thing and not sincerely. | ||
So, liberty is the same way. | ||
You can't force liberty on somebody. | ||
You can't... | ||
Just like you can't force somebody into Christianity. | ||
These things are really deeply intertwined. | ||
And the belief that people have to come to this on their own, that it's moral. | ||
The difference between charity and taxes. | ||
You're not actually doing anything noble or virtuous if you're being robbed and your money is being given to the poor. | ||
You haven't done a virtuous act. | ||
There is no virtue in that. | ||
And that's, you know, the classic example. | ||
They think socialism is virtuous, but it's like, okay, if you have money, that guy doesn't. | ||
I have a gun. | ||
I put the gun to your head. | ||
Take your money. | ||
Give it to that guy. | ||
Who has done the virtuous thing? | ||
You didn't do anything virtuous because you didn't give your money away. | ||
I didn't do anything virtuous because I stole your money, even though I gave it away. | ||
I had no right to steal it in the first place. | ||
And that person isn't being virtuous for accepting stolen money. | ||
So there's no virtue in that process. | ||
Whereas charity, if you willingly sacrifice your own stuff to give to somebody else, then there's virtue in that. | ||
It's good. | ||
It's like these are the underpinning Christian morals that America was built on that they don't like and don't want and don't understand, I think, for a large part. | ||
So all of this is intertwined fairly deeply. | ||
And of course... | ||
Peace has a character of Christianity. | ||
It's a Christian, white European character to wage a war and then declare peace and then stop the war. | ||
You have people commenting on things. | ||
The fact that you have people who arrived in America three days ago Like, calling the Confederacy traitors and being like, anybody that has a Confederate flag should be killed because they're traitors of the United States. | ||
And it's like, this is not what white people do. | ||
It's not what Christians do. | ||
We don't hold on to grudges until we've killed all of our enemies. | ||
Like, that's horrible. | ||
That's what's happening in Israel, right? | ||
It's happening in Ukraine. | ||
That's what's happening with the blood feuds that people bring over from Syria or Bangladesh. | ||
But we don't do that. | ||
Christianity doesn't really do that. | ||
We like peace. | ||
We like people just agreeing to not kill one another. | ||
And even though we can be at each other's throats and wage war, try to kill each other, when it's over and you lay the guns down and you shake hands and you have mutual respect and honor for one another... | ||
And then society and civilization and love can flourish, but it's not how any other religion sort of frames things. | ||
And all this to say is that these are all components missing from our national character that are being weeded out and destroyed in our national character very deliberately and in a way that people don't even realize it's happening. | ||
So clip number six here is The Breakfast Club. | ||
Laura Trump went on and the host was saying that Trump is dangerous. | ||
And Laura Trump talks about just some of the achievements Trump did in the realm of world peace. | ||
And they refuse or can't wrap their minds around this. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Why are you concerned about Donald Trump with the nuclear cut? | ||
unidentified
|
Did you see what he did in January 6th? | |
What did he do on January 6th? | ||
unidentified
|
He got a little bit upset and used his words. | |
What words did he say, though? | ||
unidentified
|
The words that you said earlier. | |
Peacefully and patriotically make your voice. | ||
unidentified
|
And then what happened after that? | |
So how were his words actually contributing to that? | ||
unidentified
|
Because I think that for me, him being able to just push a button, hypothetically speaking, it's a little bit scary because we've seen kind of, he gets a little bit erratic when he wants to. | |
Well, nothing happened for four years when he was in the White House. | ||
And in fact, we had a peaceful world. | ||
We had a stable world. | ||
We had world leaders who were coming to the table to talk about issues, like Kim Jong-un of North Korea, by the way. | ||
You know, Obama, when he left the White House, told my father-in-law, he said, the biggest problem you're gonna have is North Korea. | ||
It is gonna be your biggest challenge. | ||
It's gonna be the hardest thing you're gonna have to deal with. | ||
And so Donald Trump said, all right, I'm gonna try to see what we can do here because we wanna have a denuclearized Korean Peninsula. | ||
We do not want North Korea with a nuclear weapon. | ||
That is detriment. | ||
I mean, talk about nuclear war. | ||
Can you imagine? | ||
Talk about a loose cannon, Kim Jong-un, really? | ||
And so he started trying to make contact with him and he was the first president to walk across the DMZ and shake hands with the leader of North Korea to have conversations about getting rid of a possible nuclear weapon with North Korea. | ||
That is great for the world. | ||
Their world leaders did not even try it with Donald Trump because they knew he meant business. | ||
When he drew a line in the sand, he meant it. | ||
And the proof is in the pudding. | ||
So, you know, you can say, oh, well, we're worried about this. | ||
You had four years. | ||
You had no new wars. | ||
You had peace agreements instead of wars breaking out in the Middle East. | ||
Look at it right now. | ||
It is a hornet's nest, and it is very scary, the trajectory from here to what could happen if you don't have the right leadership in the White House. | ||
But it wasn't a peaceful transfer of power. | ||
unidentified
|
And he did lead an insurrection in his country. | |
And I know you keep saying the thing about the peace and patriotic part, but he also said- He offered National Guard troops to Nancy Pelosi. | ||
She didn't want to take it. | ||
Look, here's what I can tell you- But he also said, we fight like hell. | ||
And we fight. | ||
We fight like hell. | ||
And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. | ||
And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. | ||
Every politician, when you go out on the stump- Even after he got shot at, which was terrible. | ||
unidentified
|
First thing he did when he stood up was say, fight, fight, fight, fight who? | |
The person shooting him, you moron. | ||
This is what's so funny. | ||
He got shot and he stands up and yells fight, fight, fight. | ||
How dare he? | ||
What the hell are you talking about? | ||
Fight who? | ||
The person who just shot him? | ||
What do you mean fight who? | ||
He was just shot. | ||
I mean, they can't be honest, right? | ||
They can't seriously be... | ||
I mean, it's hilarious because you've all seen Kamala Harris' latest slogan, right? | ||
Like the slogan that you see everywhere. | ||
I see it on signs. | ||
I see it on her ads. | ||
It's, when we fight, we win. | ||
That's like her official slogan now. | ||
When we fight, we win. | ||
Oh, but Trump said fight. | ||
Okay. | ||
Like, they can't actually be honest, right? | ||
I really, I would hate to think, Dave, you have somebody so stupid on the radio that they actually think yelling fight after you get shot in the face with a sniper rifle, that makes you the bad one. | ||
unidentified
|
Charlemagne the dog knows what he's doing. | |
Apparently so. | ||
unidentified
|
I mean, it's honestly a lawyering tactic, right? | |
Like, if you know that you have someone, you know, don't concede the point. | ||
So, you know, he's asserting that it was an insurrection, right? | ||
He's framing this as a violent insurrection when everybody knows it wasn't. | ||
And time and time again, people arguing that will go straight back to those statements. | ||
Yeah. | ||
See, this is what I mean. | ||
Who cares? | ||
Like, what are we talking about? | ||
They're just lying. | ||
They're just lying. | ||
They're just full of crap. | ||
They're just... | ||
Like, it's so exhausting. | ||
Was it an insurrection? | ||
Should he have yelled? | ||
But his language... | ||
It's like, just... | ||
Enough. | ||
Enough. | ||
These people are liars. | ||
There's liars. | ||
Just why even talk to them? | ||
Why even talk about them? | ||
Why even... | ||
Like, try to discuss what the... | ||
What the language... | ||
They're just... | ||
I don't know. | ||
It's just exhausting. | ||
It's just, we'll just laugh. | ||
Let's just laugh at them. | ||
Should we just laugh at them instead? | ||
I think so. | ||
I just want to play this video. | ||
It's two. | ||
I don't know if I'll be able to get to both, but it's sort of the same video. | ||
We'll go first to clip number 10 here because a Bronx barber, Trump's in a barber shop in the Bronx because he just does things like that. | ||
He's awesome. | ||
And, uh, The barber tells Trump how much his election, not election, electricity bill has gone up under Joe Biden. | ||
And Trump's response is just classic. | ||
We should keep it as like a reaction video that the crew can play at appropriate times. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 10 and just watch Trump's reaction when he hears that the energy bills have gone up by like 10 times in seven months. | ||
unidentified
|
My issue was more of the energy. | |
I've been paying $2,100 since I first opened up. | ||
In the last seven months, it shot up to $15,000. | ||
What? | ||
What? | ||
I think that is the exact what a lot of contractors heard before they did not get paid by Donald Trump, right? | ||
We quoted you $2,000. | ||
It's actually $15,000. | ||
What? | ||
No. | ||
No. | ||
unidentified
|
Are we sure he's just cutting hair? | |
Yeah, right. | ||
Here's his full answer, clip number 14. | ||
unidentified
|
My biggest concern is... | |
The future and the future generation, my kids' generation. | ||
A lot of people are worried that attaining the American dream at this point in time and in the near future is going to be unattainable for this upcoming generation, which I have kids that are part of that generation. | ||
How many kids you have? | ||
unidentified
|
I have two, a 17 and an 18-year-old. | |
I believe one of the biggest hurdles we have when it comes to attaining that American dream is over taxation. | ||
When it comes to federal taxes, I know we're going to bring back, I'm sure you're going to start back up the pipeline, the Keystone pipeline, which is going to generate... | ||
An abundance of revenue. | ||
Also, with the tariffs that you've spoken of. | ||
So my question is, with all this extra revenue we're gonna be bringing into the country, so do you believe at some point in time we could find a way, once the country's back on its feet and getting enough revenue and paid off our debt, do you think it's possible to find a way to eliminate federal taxes? | ||
There is a way. | ||
You know, in the old days, when we were smart, when we were a smart country, in the 1890s and all, this is when the country was relatively the richest it ever was. | ||
It had all tariffs. | ||
It didn't have an income tax. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. | |
Okay, now we have income taxes and we have people that are dying, they're paying tax and they don't have the money to pay the tax. | ||
You know, in the old days, 1890, 1880, we had so much money, they had to set up committees, blue ribbon committees, how to spend our wealth. | ||
We had no idea how to spend it with so much money. | ||
Then we went to the income tax system and the rest is sort of history. | ||
But no, there is a way. | ||
I mean, if we... | ||
If what I'm planning comes out—it's a great question, by the way. | ||
unidentified
|
Everyone could attain the American dream. | |
You're a pretty sophisticated cat, you know? | ||
unidentified
|
Everyone could attain the American dream if it wasn't for the high cost, the burden of high taxes. | |
And we're taxed at every step of the way. | ||
Brilliant stuff. | ||
We'll actually tell you about Trump's tax plan that will eliminate income taxes on the other side. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
I'll be joined by Brother Nathaniel in the next hour. | ||
I thought I'd be able to talk about Israel a little bit before he came on. | ||
We may have to save all those topics for once he's on. | ||
Because I still have a lot of election news to talk about. | ||
First, from the video that we just saw. | ||
Trump tax plans could exempt 93 million Americans from income tax. | ||
Donald Trump's tax reform ideas could leave roughly 93.2 million Americans off the hook for at least part of their income tax. | ||
Trump's proposed eliminating taxes on tips and Social Security benefits, and he would think about exemptions for firefighters, police, and military personnel. | ||
Trump said that he would replace the lost tax revenue with revenue from tariffs, but tax experts say tariffs would not offset the tax losses. | ||
Well, we can stop spending so much money. | ||
That'd be one thing. | ||
That'd be one thing you could do. | ||
As part of his economic pitch to voters, Trump has floated a sweeping tax overhaul, including a slate of income tax breaks, as well as no tax on tips. | ||
He wants to do a 20% universal tariff on all imports from countries with a specific 60% rate for Chinese imports in an effort to boost American productivity and manufacturing. | ||
So I guess, you know, if you like paying taxes, vote for Kamala Harris, I guess is the answer. | ||
If you like your wages garnished to the tune of, I don't know, 50-60%, once you add it all up, go ahead and vote for Kamala Harris because Israel and Ukraine need your money. | ||
unidentified
|
How else are we going to achieve equality? | |
A little Freudian slip there, Matt. | ||
A little Freudian slip, I think. | ||
Yes, we must tax ourselves into equality. | ||
Equality, the process by which the lowest common denominator becomes the highest height able to be reached. | ||
I got some other election news. | ||
This is just a quick one, but typical of what the Democrats are trying to do. | ||
Again, you know, it's just it's the same old thing, right? | ||
Kamala Harris can't do friendly interviews. | ||
They have to edit it and destroy their own credibility just in a desperate attempt to not make her look quite as retarded as she truly is. | ||
She can't do unfriendly interviews because, well, look at what happened with Brett Baer. | ||
It's just it was just sad, just sad and embarrassing when she tries to go up against somebody that isn't spoon feeding her the answers to the questions. | ||
She can't do debates because she's Kamala Harris. | ||
What about town halls? | ||
Can they hold town halls? | ||
Is that something that they could do and not diminish their own electoral chances? | ||
Only under certain circumstances. | ||
In this case, it's Kamala Harris doing a fake town hall With, as this post puts it, loser Warhawk Liz Cheney, and the host admits it's not a town hall. | ||
It's pre-selected, pre-determined questions that actors are asking. | ||
Let's watch clip number seven. | ||
unidentified
|
You're not, unfortunately. | |
We have some pre-determined questions, and hopefully I'll be able to ask some of the questions that might be in your head. | ||
I hope so. | ||
Yeah, she's going to read your mind. | ||
Don't worry, folks. | ||
You don't have to ask questions of your potential leader who's asking for your vote because they've got a psychic to do it for you. | ||
I would feel cheated, personally. | ||
That clip starts with a person from the audience going, are we going to get to ask questions? | ||
She's like, no. | ||
The campaign has provided us questions, but hopefully through some sort of psychic connection, they will have... | ||
Presuppose the questions you're gonna ask, like, how are you so cool and fancy? | ||
And why aren't you winning by more since everyone loves you so much? | ||
You know, the really hard-hitting questions that they get from the left. | ||
Can you imagine going to a town hall? | ||
That you think is a town hall, only to be told, no, you're a prop for this little skit we're carrying out where the predetermined questions and answers will be dressed up like a town hall, but you're not allowed to ask any questions. | ||
So, sit there and clap. | ||
Why not? | ||
Why can't you answer questions? | ||
Why can't you take questions in a town hall? | ||
I mean, seriously, you're going to vote for somebody that can't answer questions, like, that refuses to take questions from the public. | ||
Like, that's... | ||
unidentified
|
That's crazy. | |
And this is the thing. | ||
So, one thing I want to do is I want to talk about potential outcomes of this election. | ||
There's only a few. | ||
None of them bode well. | ||
Okay? | ||
First of all, the fact that Kamala even has a remote chance in this election is really a damning indictment of our entire electoral system. | ||
Obviously, I'm a Trump supporter. | ||
Obviously, I disagree with Kamala Harris on substance and on policy and on any number of partisan issues. | ||
But can you honestly tell me, from a nonpartisan perspective, from a purely objective stance, if you were to get somebody from a different time period, bring a foreigner, like somebody who was just totally outside of the Zeitgeist, the milieu, the atmosphere of politics right now. | ||
And looking at this just purely objectively, you've got somebody with no accomplishments. | ||
The record that she does have is abysmal. | ||
Everything the Biden campaign or the Biden presidency and administration have done while in power has been bad, just blatantly bad. | ||
Not because I have a political difference, but because the outcomes have been negative. | ||
They've allowed the Ukraine war to go on for years on end, murdering millions of people with no end in sight. | ||
They've allowed and continue to allow, as we speak, are allowing Israel to carry out a genocide in front of everybody with imagery that honestly makes the Holocaust look Merciful by comparison. | ||
Inflation is bankrupting America. | ||
$7,000 per family, per individual actually, more for just regular foodstuffs like a $100,000 Salary at the beginning of their administration is equal to an $80,000 salary today just from sheer inflation. | ||
Like just terrible outcomes. | ||
Just terrible outcomes across the board. | ||
Crime is up. | ||
Inflation is up. | ||
unidentified
|
Just... | |
Okay, so she has no qualifications or achievements to speak of. | ||
She cannot handle even... | ||
Moderately contentious conversation. | ||
This is the person you're trying to put as the spokesman of America to go up against the likes of Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping. | ||
And she crumbles under polite pushback by Bret Baier. | ||
Fox News talking head. | ||
There's nothing about her that anybody should want... | ||
And you can tell because when you actually ask Kamala Harris supporters why they support Kamala Harris, the only legitimate reason they can give is vibes. | ||
There's like, she's happy, she's nice. | ||
I mean, literally, because the Harris campaign put out TikToks of her dancing, that's why you're voting for her. | ||
First of all, if she was the nicest person in the world, That is not remotely a qualification for presidency. | ||
But she's also clearly not a nice person. | ||
You can only believe she's a nice person if you only consume propaganda. | ||
Any behind-the-scenes stuff, any leaks or statements from people that work with her for years. | ||
I mean, this has been throughout Biden's presidency. | ||
There's been little leaks and little statements. | ||
She's a bitch. | ||
Everybody says it. | ||
So it's like, I mean, they're in this realm where it's like they believe something that's not true, that she's nice. | ||
Even if it was true, it wouldn't be a qualification for presidency. | ||
So it's like, what are we doing here? | ||
She has no qualifications. | ||
She has no achievements. | ||
She can't handle pressure. | ||
She cackles like a hyena. | ||
She's the most fraudulent person. | ||
Politician you've ever seen. | ||
I mean, she's just fakeness embodied. | ||
She believes nothing. | ||
Her stances are just completely malleable to whoever she happens to be speaking to at the moment. | ||
So I get that people... | ||
Like, think Trump is rude or whatever. | ||
Now, if you think that's a reason not to vote for him, president, fine. | ||
But you can't say he's not qualified. | ||
You can't say he didn't have a successful presidency when he was president, avoiding wars, creating, you know, setting up, setting up the, you know, paving the way for world peace, meeting with North Korea, establishing the Abraham Accords. | ||
I mean, You can say you don't like his tone, but you can't say he's not qualified or that there's not a reason to vote for him. | ||
Kamala Harris, there is no reason. | ||
So the fact that she's even... | ||
It could all be an illusion. | ||
Maybe she has just no chance in hell. | ||
But clearly, there's a large contingent of Americans who are voting for her and are excited to vote for her. | ||
And that's a major problem. | ||
That's a big issue. | ||
That just actually means they will literally vote for anybody. | ||
The Democrats could actually run Kermit the Frog. | ||
And people wouldn't even ask whose hand it was, manipulating the puppet. | ||
Well, but Kermit's so fun. | ||
No, but he's really, like, he's a really nice guy. | ||
It's like, no, he's not, he's a, what? | ||
He's a cartoon character. | ||
He's a puppet. | ||
They don't care. | ||
So, it's like, this is just, it's just sad. | ||
It's just sad what they've done to So she shouldn't have a snowball's chance in hell. | ||
Apparently she does. | ||
Now that's crazy. | ||
That's totally crazy. | ||
And nobody who's actually paying attention thinks that she is going to win. | ||
So what are the options? | ||
And none of them are good, by the way. | ||
One option is that somehow she wins and it's legitimate. | ||
Now, that's almost not even a possibility because of everything they're setting up in terms of voter fraud. | ||
It's like there's no way we're going to believe that she wins. | ||
I'm telling you right now, nobody is going to believe it if Kamala Harris is declared the winner of the election. | ||
Nobody's going to buy it. | ||
The only way it's even remotely possible is if they cheat hugely, which they are. | ||
You have Brad Raffensperger, Secretary of State of Georgia, Saying that only 75% of Georgia votes will be in on the day of the election because 25% of votes in Georgia are from overseas. | ||
How does that make any sense at all? | ||
A quarter of the votes, 25% of the votes in Georgia are going to come from overseas? | ||
They're cheating. | ||
That means they're cheating. | ||
Wait, you're telling me a quarter of Georgia is out of town on November 5th? | ||
So even if she wins, it's already the number of strange things going on. | ||
Almost nobody's going to believe it. | ||
Now, it could be that they're planning for that, just like they did in 2020. | ||
Just like we told you they were going to do months before the election in 2020. | ||
We told you, and they're probably going to do it again, they're going to cheat to win. | ||
They're going to cheat in such an obvious fashion. | ||
They want to get caught. | ||
They want it to be obvious that they're cheating. | ||
Because they want the outrage. | ||
Because they know the media is not going to call them on it. | ||
They know that the courts that they control are not going to hear the cases. | ||
They know they can get away with it officially. | ||
Because the people doing it are the ones who would be in charge of stopping it. | ||
so they're going to get away with it and they want the outrage They want the Trump supporters to be infuriated. | ||
They're doing it deliberately, on purpose, in a psychological operation to outrage Trump supporters to get them to do something violent to justify the crackdown that they're planning. | ||
So if Kamala Harris is declared the winner, nobody's going to buy it. | ||
Everybody's going to know they're cheating. | ||
Everybody already knows that they are cheating at this moment. | ||
They're going to get outraged, and they're going to use the outrage, the questioning of the election, whatever Trump supporters choose to do, as an excuse to pull off a January 6 nationwide. | ||
The other option is Trump wins, in which case... | ||
They've told us what they're going to do. | ||
Civil war conditions. | ||
Use the 14th Amendment. | ||
Try to stop Trump from getting into office. | ||
They've announced that they will object to the slate of electors. | ||
If Trump wins, they're going to try everything they can to stop him from getting in, including claiming that he's reading the election. | ||
I mean, Obama said Trump is going to cheat. | ||
I'll tell you what. | ||
The person who... | ||
Works at your shop and is demanding that you put in security cameras is not the one you have to worry about stealing from you. | ||
The one you have to worry about stealing from you is the guy who sits there and goes, it's racist to have security cameras. | ||
Also, that guy is going to steal from you. | ||
If you actually... | ||
It's just one of these... | ||
This is what I mean by it's exhausting. | ||
It's like, okay... | ||
If we're actually supposed to take them on their word, we're just dealing with these just relentless pathological liars. | ||
If Obama actually believes that Trump is going to cheat, then why are the Democrats calling every attempt to establish election integrity called racist and shut down and are prevented by the Democrats? | ||
It's just obvious. | ||
It's just all of this is exhausting and obvious. | ||
And outrageous that they're just able to lie with impunity over and over forever. | ||
But that's what they do. | ||
From M4s.com, swing states, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia under fire for election oddities. | ||
With the 2024 presidential election just two weeks away, Americans have their eyes peeled for malfeasance. | ||
Several swing states are being criticized for apparent election irregularities, even as ex-owner Elon Musk questions a bizarre anomaly with Michigan voter rolls. | ||
Responding to a lawsuit claimed that there are more registered voters than eligible citizens on Michigan's voter rolls, Musk simply asked, is that true, tagging the community notes feature to get to the bottom of the question. | ||
Michigan's George Soros-funded Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson responded to Musk, claiming he was spreading dangerous disinformation by simply asking a question. | ||
Jocelyn Benson, by the way, is one of these members of the Secretary of State Club. | ||
They all got their start at ACLU. Benson and a number of other state, you know, secretaries of state members. | ||
You know, they celebrate. | ||
They're like, yeah, we all started at ACLU and then we all got appointed secretaries of state and now we all use our position to guarantee that Trump will never win again. | ||
That's like their main mission. | ||
That is their stated objective. | ||
They're all working in coordination, in collaboration, in a conspiracy to stop Trump from winning because, you know, what's a couple laws being broken if you're stopping Hitler, right? | ||
And it's just one of the various election oddities that just so happen to only occur in the states that Democrats need to win. | ||
Only occur in the five states that just happen to shut down voting in the middle of the night only for the responses to completely flip by the time you woke up in the morning in 2020. | ||
Just happens to be these certain particular states. | ||
That happen to have all of these irregularities, all of these strange rule changes, all of these attempts to stop voter integrity, to stop cleaning up the voter rolls. | ||
Like, we don't have to play along with the charade. | ||
We don't have to take their statements seriously. | ||
We don't have to treat them like they are honest actors trying to actually fulfill the duties and obligations of the offices for which they hold. | ||
They aren't even pretending to do that. | ||
They brag about it. | ||
We covered it extensively at the time that the videos were leaked of people like Jocelyn Benson, Secretary of State, bragging about the fact that all the Secretaries of State were working in coordination, talked to each other constantly, were figuring out what exactly to do by what the others were doing, all in an effort, stated, deliberate, advertised effort to stop Donald Trump from being in office. | ||
Why are we putting up with this? | ||
Musk posted a response to Benson showing a community notes message revealing the state did not plan on purging 600,000 voters from its rolls until the year 2027. | ||
It's the illegal voters. | ||
It's the migrant voters. | ||
It's the vote counting fraud. | ||
It's the scanning ballots. | ||
It's what we showed you yesterday with the adjudication of ballots, allowing the ballot supervisors to change the answers. | ||
They're doing all of these things. | ||
So again, when we talk about like... | ||
Looking forward into the future. | ||
The options are Kamala Harris wins. | ||
Nobody buys it. | ||
They cheat in an obvious, blatant fashion and then tell you that pointing out that they're cheating is disinformation and go after you and try to charge you and arrest you and do what they did in Britain with the protesters there, a nationwide January 6th-style roundup of people for their free speech activity under the guise of Disinformation and election integrity, as they refuse election integrity. | ||
The other option is Trump wins. | ||
If Trump wins, which he absolutely should, according to all of the polls and all of the logic, it's just everything points to that. | ||
If he does win, they're going to try to keep him out of office. | ||
They're going to activate Antifa. | ||
They're going to Launch a full-scale 2020-style George Floyd mobs in every city, and if anybody tries to defend yourself or fight back against them or send out the National Guard, then of course they'll try to shut that down. | ||
They might just kill Trump, which has been my prediction for a long time, let him win, then kill him, piss off all of the Republicans to an insane degree, and then arrest them all for the threat of violence. | ||
The other option, which looks increasingly likely, is that a truly devastating world war breaks out in the next two weeks. | ||
China's saying they're going to make a big move very shortly. | ||
Xi Jinping... | ||
Telling his military to prepare for full-scale war in the very near future. | ||
At exactly the same time that Israel is announcing that they are planning to imminently launch a massive and devastating attack against Iranian sites to which Iran has said that they will respond powerfully. | ||
The US military is saying that this will be a conflict that will be devastating in the last many months. | ||
If that happens in the next two weeks, things could unfold very quickly. | ||
And it's not out of the question that through terrorist acts in the United States, through activating operative networks of migrants here in the United States, we could be in a lockdown scenario two weeks from now. | ||
And the election could be temporarily postponed, only to never actually happen. | ||
That is not out of the question. | ||
It's not even being avoided by the people in power. | ||
They seem desperate to bring about this eventuality. | ||
So I'm a little bit concerned. | ||
And you just need to be prepared for any of these eventualities. | ||
The final and Sort of depressing part of all of this is that say we avoid all of these eventualities. | ||
The vote is so big that they can't rig it. | ||
And there is such a thing as too big to rig. | ||
There is such a thing as so many votes for Donald Trump that they cannot get enough votes for Kamala Harris. | ||
So you have to vote, you have to get out, you have to do this. | ||
Let's say we avoid World War III. Let's say we avoid the Kamala Harris cheating to win. | ||
Let's say we avoid Trump being killed in the interim between the election and the inauguration. | ||
And avoid the Civil War level conflict that Jamie Raskin and others are rubbing their hands and eager to bring about. | ||
Let's say Donald Trump gets into office through a series of miracles in January. | ||
Do you know what happens then? | ||
What happens is they collapse the economy, blame it on Trump, and bring about depression-level poverty in the United States by no longer holding back the inevitable collapse of the U.S. dollar. | ||
So be prepared for all of that. | ||
I don't know which one they'll do, but this is the issue. | ||
We've got evil, evil people operating and occupying the highest levels in government and the corporate world. | ||
And they have a variety of cards to play against Trump. | ||
All we have is trust. | ||
Third hour is on. | ||
This is American Journal. | ||
I'll be joined very shortly by Brother Nathaniel. | ||
At Real Bro Nat. | ||
But we're going to take this first five-minute segment, so I want to show you a video. | ||
It's about a sheriff's race in Idaho, but I think it's very appropriate for all Americans to hear. | ||
And a shout-out to Ian Carroll at Cancel Cloco on X for putting this together. | ||
It's a local sheriff who refuses to debate in Idaho, and a lesson you can learn no matter where you are in the United States. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
So the sheriff who's up for re-election here in Boise is refusing to have a debate with his opponent. | ||
And so the people here have just gone ahead and scheduled one anyways, and they're trolling him super hard and it's hilarious. | ||
I'm going to tell you all about it, but it's also a good reminder of what we're voting for in this election and what American values are actually all about on the ballot right now. | ||
So this is what's going on. | ||
Here in Ada County where I'm currently living in like the Boise, Idaho area, there's this thing happening with the sheriff's race where the incumbent sheriff who got selected, you know, like five, four years ago almost, and then he got elected and now he's up for reelection again. | ||
This dude, Mr. | ||
Clifford, He's been the sheriff here since he was appointed in 2021, and his challenger is challenging him to a debate. | ||
This guy, Doug. | ||
And at first you're like, well, sheriffs? | ||
Having a debate? | ||
That's kind of weird, right? | ||
Like, that's not normal, right? | ||
Well, actually, it's not unheard of, but think about it for a second. | ||
This is the guy that was enforcing mask mandates during COVID. This is the guy that is in charge of how your local police enforce federal or don't enforce federal government overreach of law or, you know, like this is... | ||
Who is going to be in charge of how your community is or is not protected from federal overreach in the next four years? | ||
And let's just say it was a little controversial how this dude handled the COVID federal overreach here in the Boise area the last four years. | ||
He's also seemed to be a little bit less than satisfactory on like the woke stuff here lately. | ||
And like you don't need a sheriff's debate, but he was challenged to one and he's just straight up refusing. | ||
And so what they've done is they've just decided to go ahead and schedule one regardless. | ||
Doug here was like, yeah dude, I'll show up for a debate. | ||
I'm happy to defend my policies. | ||
He's a constitutionalist. | ||
He's very pro-constitutional rights. | ||
And Matt Clifford is just like, no, not doing it. | ||
Despite the fact that it's scheduled for this Saturday at 1.30pm at the local library in Meridian. | ||
These are the details if you want to go there. | ||
It would be a shame if the local sheriff's office got some phone calls suggesting that maybe He should attend the debate for his position in order to earn the votes of his constituents. | ||
Because all of this Clifford guy, the guy who's been sheriff for this whole time, all of his, like, Facebook posts, I'm pretty sure they're an intern posting. | ||
They don't feel real. | ||
And all of his, like, campaign policies on his website feel very just canned Republican Party. | ||
Like, it's very hard to tell what this dude actually believes. | ||
And his record doesn't seem to be great. | ||
Like, I'm not native here, but based on what everyone else is saying around here, it doesn't sound great. | ||
So I just thought it would be hilarious if Doug Trouble's Facebook account got completely blown up with new followers. | ||
And he doesn't really use his X account, but it would be hilarious if we blew up his X account with new followers too, just for the hell of it, because we can. | ||
Because you guys know me, I'm like a free speech absolutist, and you should be able to defend your policies in an open forum, in a debate. | ||
That's the foundation of American democracy. | ||
And I really can't think of anyone better to describe Matt Clifford's take on it than Matt Clifford himself. | ||
unidentified
|
Sheriff Clifford, got a question for you. | |
Doug Traubel would like to debate you. | ||
Are you gonna debate Doug Traubel? | ||
I'm not. | ||
And why not? | ||
Because I'm gonna win and I don't need to debate him. | ||
Oh. | ||
All right, bud. | ||
So anyways, even if you're not in the county, take your local election seriously. | ||
Get informed. | ||
I'll post a link to Doug's socials below. | ||
Just go blow up his socials just because it's going to be hilarious. | ||
Give him some support and some love for standing up for free speech and American values and debate. | ||
And since Matt Clifford isn't going to be debating, apparently, I guess in order to find out what policies he supports, you kind of probably just have to call the sheriff's office at this number, I would assume, and ask. | ||
Or maybe, I mean, I don't know. | ||
To clarify, I would never suggest you troll the sheriff's office. | ||
I'm just saying you could call and ask that he attend the debate, respectfully. | ||
I mean, it is democracy, right? | ||
Ian Carroll at Cancel CloCo. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
Brother Nathaniel on the other side. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
My guest is Brother Nathaniel Kaffner. | ||
Brother Nathan, Brother Nathaniel Kapner was born of two Jewish parents and raised in traditional Judaism in the synagogue. | ||
At the age of 19, however, he read the New Testament for the first time and was convinced that Jesus was the Messiah. | ||
He converted, and later on in his adult life, he felt it necessary to start Real Jew News, a website that points out the dominant influence of Judaism on all facets of American life. | ||
You can find that website at realjewnews.com. | ||
He's on X at Real Bro Nat. | ||
Real Bro Nat. | ||
Thank you so much for joining us, Brother Nathaniel. | ||
There you are. | ||
Hey. | ||
Shalom. | ||
Shalom, sir. | ||
You had a baby. | ||
Your wife had a baby. | ||
My wife had a baby, yes, about three weeks ago. | ||
Yeah, no, I'm very gender specific. | ||
Your wife had a baby, not you. | ||
That's true. | ||
You had something to do with it. | ||
I've been doing chores for three weeks non-stop. | ||
It's exhausting. | ||
Yes, it's going very well. | ||
Well, I'm very happy to have you on the show. | ||
I've been wanting to talk to you for a while because you make people mad. | ||
You make a lot of people mad with what you say, but I don't get mad at what you say. | ||
I think what you say is very interesting, and you have perspective that not a lot of us have, which I would say is that From what I've heard you talk about, you sort of come from a family of what could be described as like Jewish extremists. | ||
Do you think that would be a fair characterization? | ||
No, not really. | ||
My dad was a very strong Orthodox Jew. | ||
He laid tefillin. | ||
You know, there was a big thing about the box on Netanyahu's forehead. | ||
People said, what's the box? | ||
Well, that's called tefillin. | ||
And, well, Jesus Christ, in the New Testament, it's called phylacteries. | ||
They make wide and long their phylacteries, said Jesus, you know, to mock them, really. | ||
But my father was a very strong Orthodox Jew, and I grew up in the traditional Judaism. | ||
I went to Hebrew school, synagogue, Shabbos service, and, you know, the whole nine yards, and the whole gefilte of fish. | ||
But Interestingly enough, my dad was a Jewish supremacist in the sense that he felt that the Jews had the higher ground, morally, intellectually, over the goyim. | ||
You see, the Jews would call people like you a goy and your wife a shiksa, which basically comes from the Hebrew Shechus, which means an unclean animal. | ||
I grew up in this, okay? | ||
But my dad, interestingly enough, was anti-Zionist, and he called out Elie Wiesel when he first appeared on Ed Sullivan in agony, pretending he was in a concentration camp. | ||
They were basically work camps. | ||
We were taught as kids in the 50s. | ||
He said he's a fraud. | ||
So I kind of grew up in very strong Jewish supremacy, but at the same time, my dad would see beyond the facade And he would take me, not so much my brother, my brother was very athletic and I wasn't, I was just skinny kid that they kick, | ||
you know, sit on the beach at, but he took me under his wing to understand beyond the facade and to understand what is behind the narration and that he says there's always something behind the headline. | ||
And I grew up as a political animal, basically. | ||
It started with the David Susskind show. | ||
That was the first talk show. | ||
It was called Open End. | ||
It meant that there was never a decisive time limit on it. | ||
And I saw Martin Luther King before he even got famous on that David Susskind show. | ||
Hey, here's my pet snake. | ||
This is Lucifer. | ||
Larry, but he says we're not so bad, really. | ||
He said, why should I take the hit for what somebody did a long time ago? | ||
Why should I take the hit? | ||
He wants to be called Larry, but I call him Lucifer. | ||
That's my pet snake. | ||
Okay, anyways. | ||
I didn't realize we'd... | ||
Go ahead. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
You ask me whatever you want. | ||
That's how I grew up, yeah. | ||
unidentified
|
Like if I said stupid. | |
My parents or my uncles would say, you have a goya shakup. | ||
That meant I think like a goy, if I said something. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
Yeah, and, you know, I hear you say those things, and I know, you know, some people's responses, just sort of get mad at what you're saying, like you're saying, like you're characterizing all Jews, and I just sort of, my whole stance is just treat Jews like you treat everybody else, | ||
and if I had somebody from a, you know, Christian background whose parents thought that Christians were superior and, you know, all non-Christians were decadal and this stuff, it's like, well, that's I'm interested in hearing that because obviously there are people that have extreme beliefs throughout the country. | ||
Do all Jews talk like that? | ||
As you bring this up, is this a regular thing? | ||
Is it something that is only extremist pockets of the community believe this stuff? | ||
How widespread are these supremacist ideas? | ||
Well, it's endemic. | ||
It's crucial to understand behavioral patterns. | ||
I mean, come on. | ||
unidentified
|
The Jew thinks himself as a collective. | |
For instance, when Newt Gingrich criticized George Soros for promoting all these DAs who were letting criminals out on bail, all of a sudden he's attacking us. | ||
No, he was just criticizing George Soros, and the shiksa that was on Fox News had a fit. | ||
She didn't know how to handle it. | ||
He's criticizing George Soros, and all of a sudden she sees anti-Semitism! | ||
He's attacking the Jewish people! | ||
And she got all upset, shut him down, he didn't like it, and she was fired, the poor shiksa. | ||
She never got married, she never had children, she's 39 years old, her career's ruined. | ||
No, that is... | ||
I mean, it's one of the difficult... | ||
And I'm sorry, we're having a little bit of trouble with audio. | ||
So there's some awkward pauses because I don't want to talk over you because your audio gets cut off. | ||
So sorry if it's a little bit awkward. | ||
That's just because we have a bit of a delay here. | ||
But yeah, this is an issue I see all the time where you... | ||
Criticize George Soros. | ||
And suddenly you've got other Jewish people acting like you're insulting them. | ||
And it's like, well, what the hell? | ||
Don't you have a problem with George Soros too? | ||
Like, why would you tie yourself at the hip to this scumbag who literally, I mean, literally put Jews on trains to go to concentration camps, whatever they were, work camps, death camp, whatever. | ||
He actively participated in that, but he's untouchable. | ||
I mean, this is what confuses people. | ||
And I always associate it kind of with Like, if you see a video, I'll see a video posted on X, and it'll be, you know, a black guy beating up a white person. | ||
Now, I don't blame all black people for that action of that black guy. | ||
But then you go in the comments, and it's 10,000 black people going, yeah, she deserved it, get that white bee. | ||
And it's like, okay, is there a major problem here? | ||
Because I didn't... | ||
I wasn't thinking George Soros represented all Jewish people until all the Jewish people came out in defense of George Soros. | ||
Like, what's going on here? | ||
And... | ||
What's behind this reflexive action to defend Jewish people, even when they're doing bad things? | ||
Well, look, we cannot be ignorant of these patterns that we constantly see. | ||
And we have to ask each other, do we want to remain ignorant of this pattern? | ||
And we only survive by recognizing this pattern. | ||
So I bring out the example, and you jump right on it, and you see it. | ||
You criticize George Soros. | ||
A lot of people don't even think he's a Jew. | ||
A lot of people think he's a Greek because he took on the name Soros. | ||
That's not his name. | ||
His name is Grigori Schwartz. | ||
So they don't even know he's a Jew. | ||
But the Jews know he's a Jew. | ||
He's one of us. | ||
How dare you criticize him? | ||
This is an anti-Semitic trope, says Jonathan Green Black, who's CEO of the ADL. He's the head of the censorship regime. | ||
And all Jews are part of this censorship regime. | ||
How dare you criticize George Soros? | ||
You're criticizing us. | ||
Shut him down. | ||
Shut it down. | ||
Ban him. | ||
Old Jews think this way. | ||
They think in the sense of collective. | ||
Now the Jews have two faces. | ||
They have one before the goyim in public. | ||
They have another behind closed doors. | ||
I saw, I grew up behind closed doors, how Jews look upon you, your wife, your children, but themselves categorically different. | ||
But again, is that typical or is that an extreme end of the spectrum? | ||
It's not extreme. | ||
It's just the characteristic of the collective Jew. | ||
And the one who brought this out was Henry Ford Sr. | ||
He called the Jewish people the international Jew. | ||
Because he saw it, he understood it, because he had a manufacturing plant that depended on global Jewish finance. | ||
He understood that the Jew thinks collectively, and he was the first one to bring this to the American people in his Dearborn Independent. | ||
I read this when I was a kid. | ||
My dad wanted me to read it so I could understand how the Gentiles look upon us. | ||
It's always us and them. | ||
It's not, well, we look upon each one individually, equally. | ||
The Jew doesn't think that way. | ||
He wants you to think that way. | ||
But he doesn't. | ||
And when I say he, the collective Jew. | ||
Yeah, you know, that... | ||
It's one of the things where it's like, I have a lot of Jewish friends, and you go to a Jewish wedding or whatever, and Judaism is very central. | ||
And when you see just your typical Jewish family, they're all sort of secular Jews where I grew up, but they all go to synagogue, they all go to Hebrew school, they all send their kids to the same camp, and it's central to their identity. | ||
And in a way... | ||
I wish Christians were a little bit more like that. | ||
It was a little bit more central to their identity. | ||
They took more effort in solidifying this community aspect. | ||
The Jews I know, they get married young. | ||
There's a lot of family pressure. | ||
You've got to get married. | ||
You've got to get married to a Jew. | ||
You've got to have babies. | ||
You've got to start having babies. | ||
Then I see my white Christian friends. | ||
They're 35. | ||
They've got no prospects. | ||
They've got no family. | ||
In a way, I don't want to criticize Jews for doing this because It's fine. | ||
It's good. | ||
It's what I want my community to do. | ||
But then you see a lot of Jews who feel that way about their community, but then feel it's a danger for white people to have the same sort of cohesiveness and solidarity. | ||
And I'm not down with the hypocrisy. | ||
But, you know, it's not like it's a bad thing to have this strong community in-group preference, is it? | ||
I mean, is that the bad thing? | ||
Or is it bad that it's just them? | ||
Like, where's the issue with that for you? | ||
Well, the issue is collectively, They have all the power in Jumerica. | ||
And power is ruinous. | ||
Absolutely ruinous. | ||
I mean, just look at what's happening before our eyes that Benji Shapiro can get on, and he's featured on Fox News, and he was asked by a nice Christian Gentile boy at some speech he gave at some college yesterday, how can you condone what the IDF is doing In Gaza and Lebanon. | ||
And he said, not only do I condone it, I praise and laud it. | ||
This is how the Jew rethink. | ||
This is the lobby. | ||
There's a thousand Jewish organizations that bribe and blackmail the hacks on Capitol Hill, except for one, Thomas Massey. | ||
He's the true son of Ron Paul, not Rand. | ||
Yeah, and of course he told everybody in Congress as an AIPAC handler. | ||
I actually have that video, and I wanted to get your comment on it, because yeah, this blew my mind, the heartlessness with which Ben Shapiro answers this question. | ||
You collect, they all think this way. | ||
They won't say it in front of you. | ||
They say, oh, it's terrible. | ||
But behind closed doors, it says no, because that little baby that they burned alive will grow up, they say, to be a Hamas. | ||
Yeah, it is insane to me. | ||
I don't get it. | ||
Let's watch the video and we will respond on the other side. | ||
I'll get Brother Nathaniel's response. | ||
This is clip number four, I believe, right? | ||
That's Ben Shapiro. | ||
This is Ben Shapiro being asked a question about just the tens of thousands of dead children in Gaza and his response is really horrifying. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
As an American Jew, how can you continue to condone the actions of the Israeli government, condoned by the US government, in the Gaza Strip, where over 40,000 people have died, including Palestinians and Israelis, and large numbers of children and civilians? | |
How can you continue to condone those actions? | ||
Okay, so, okay, hold on. | ||
I wanna correct you. | ||
unidentified
|
I don't just condone the actions of the Israeli Defense Forces and the Israeli government. | |
I celebrate and loud them. | ||
Standing ovation. | ||
I'm not morally apathetic about what's happening. | ||
I'm not morally apathetic about what's happening. | ||
I celebrate and laud the killing of innocent women and children. | ||
I mean, that's just... | ||
You know, part of me thinks it's like it's like he's taking his his typical reaction and applying it here where it doesn't belong. | ||
Like because typically you get, you know, leftists asking him questions where they're like the red hat, the red MAGA hat scares my gay friends. | ||
And how can you condone wearing a MAGA hat? | ||
And, you know, the obvious response to that is, no, we love the MAGA hat and we're going to wear it harder because this is nonsense. | ||
But now you're talking about dead children. | ||
Now you're talking about murdering innocent people by the tens of thousands. | ||
And he's like, I love it. | ||
I'm not just don't condone it. | ||
I'm completely in favor of it. | ||
I mean, that's sick. | ||
That is sick stuff. | ||
Now, I want to talk about that's a Jewish boy that has some kind of pangs of conscience about it. | ||
And I need to comment on that because that makes it seems like, well, there are good Jews, but yet he says, I am a Jew. | ||
So he does identify as a Jew, but this whole thing, because it's so now publicly displayed, because the whole world is seeing it, it's not happening in a corner, he feels a little guilty, like some other Jews. | ||
And he is concerned that all the goyim, he probably doesn't want to say that, because he probably maybe has Gentile friends, are going to look upon someone like me that I participate in that, and I don't want them to think that about me. | ||
But yet, he will not repudiate the whole Jewish collective motif, which celebrates this and condones it. | ||
He feels guilty. | ||
He feels, you know, uh-oh, we're being exposed, and he wants to try to defend some part of Judaism that this is not good, but yet he still identifies as this collective Jew that's doing all these horrible things. | ||
Like these protesters, they block a highway. | ||
But where were they when Gaza became an open-air concentration camp in 2005? | ||
Where were they during the Nakba when the Jews were poisoning the wells and stealing the olive groves? | ||
Where were they then? | ||
They weren't there. | ||
But now that it's public and everyone sees what the Jews are doing and that the lobbies are doing, they're nervous. | ||
So let's say, oh, it's not all of us. | ||
unidentified
|
Some of us are against it. | |
This is a fake. | ||
The only ones that really are authentic about this are the Natara Karta group, which from the beginning, and I would say also Norman Finkelstein, that from the beginning did not like what the Jews were doing to the Palestinian people. | ||
It says in the Bible, thou shalt not kill, and that's exactly what they were doing. | ||
Because most of them don't believe in God. | ||
They say, oh, God gave us the land. | ||
But you ask, do you believe in God? | ||
Well, not really. | ||
It's a myth, but that's what he said. | ||
And he didn't say that. | ||
It was always contingent. | ||
So I guess the question comes down, what is a Jew, Brother Nathaniel? | ||
Because I don't quite understand it. | ||
Is it because, you know, I got a lot of Jewish friends and it's like, are you Jewish? | ||
Yes. | ||
Do you believe in God? | ||
No. | ||
All right. | ||
Well, okay. | ||
So you're secular. | ||
So that's an ethnicity, but it's a religion. | ||
But like, what... | ||
What even is it? | ||
I mean, George Soros, I don't think, believes in God. | ||
Clearly, he's not a Zionist either, I don't think, from a lot of his actions. | ||
Like, is there a unifying characteristic? | ||
Like, to be a Christian, you believe Jesus Christ. | ||
You believe in Jesus Christ. | ||
You believe in the resurrection. | ||
You believe in his message because he's the son of God. | ||
Like, you can have a lot of variations in that. | ||
You can have a lot of different takes and different determinations, but we know what the central thesis of Christianity is, and you can't be born into Christianity. | ||
You have to accept that and believe that. | ||
Is there an equivalent of... | ||
Of Judaism, and is that what causes a lot of this controversy and confusion? | ||
Is that like, what even is it to be a Jew? | ||
What does that even mean in the modern world? | ||
Well, the Jew will tell you he's chosen. | ||
Where does he get that? | ||
Historically. | ||
The Jew thinks historically. | ||
You got a friend, he's a Jewish guy, he's a nice guy, maybe have a drink together somewhere, or whatever. | ||
The Jewish guy mows the lawn next door, but he doesn't see himself in the moment. | ||
He's chosen. | ||
Where does he get that? | ||
The chosen people, the Baptists, heretics, worship Jews more than they worship Jesus. | ||
They think if you bless a Jew who killed Christ that you're going to get blessed. | ||
This is insanity. | ||
It's not scriptural at all. | ||
So the Jew thinks himself historically Oh, God chose us! | ||
But if you want to follow the history, the Jewish leaders and those who always follow the Jewish leaders historically said to Pilate, who wanted to let Jesus go, crucify him. | ||
Crucify him. | ||
His blood be upon us and upon our children. | ||
This is the Jew, collectively, that still to this day will not repudiate the murder of God. | ||
And this is called the deicidal curse, which we were shown this as Jewish children at Shabbos school, that the goyim and the church It says that we have a deicidal curse. | ||
And Abe Foxman at the ADL used to talk about this. | ||
That's why he said that the New Testament has to be designated as hate speech. | ||
So historically, the Jew called upon themselves a deicidal curse. | ||
Collectively, every Jew has a deicidal curse on him. | ||
Collectively, every Jew bears the spirit of Antichrist because they deny that God became man. | ||
That's what we have in the New Testament. | ||
Do those who call themselves Christians understand this? | ||
This is the divine word of God. | ||
That's how you understand the Jew. | ||
And that's how you can understand how a man like this scumball, this wicked thing, Benji Shapiro can say he celebrates what the IDF is doing. | ||
They're burning children alive. | ||
They're cutting off their arms. | ||
He celebrates this because he has a deicidal curse, because he bears the spirit of Antichrist. | ||
That's Ben Shapiro, who is a meme for every single Jew. | ||
Well, and it's, you know, what's so funny is, yeah, that's always on the top of the list of, like, anti-Semitic things is they'll say the Jews killed Christ. | ||
But then if you ask Ben Shapiro, he's like, yeah, he was a common criminal. | ||
He deserved to die. | ||
It's like, all right, well, okay. | ||
Blasphemy. | ||
That's blasphemy. | ||
He'll go to hell for that. | ||
Right. | ||
You can't exactly say, you know, it's some sort of, you know, anti-Semitic smear when you're the one that says it. | ||
Sorry, I didn't mean to cut you off there. | ||
No, I cut you off. | ||
I get hot. | ||
Well, I grew up with this. | ||
I grew up that the goyim are less than the Jew. | ||
No, my dad, yeah, heroically, he called Elie Wiesel a fraud. | ||
I don't know if it was heroic. | ||
He just saw through him. | ||
That's a no-brainer, really. | ||
And the other one is that he was anti-Zionist. | ||
But that was on a practicality. | ||
He says, how did the Jews plop themselves in the middle of the Muslim world? | ||
And he includes the Persians. | ||
He used to call them Persians, not Iranians. | ||
Well, tell you what, Brother Nathaniel's fired up. | ||
We'll be right back on the other side with more at Real Bro Nat on the other side. | ||
to stay with us. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
This is the American Journal. | ||
My guest is Brother Nathaniel Kaffner at RealJewNews.com. | ||
RealJewNews.com and at on X at RealBroNat.com. | ||
There's so many stories every day where the topic of Judaism or Israel come up and I was joking today. | ||
It wasn't even a joke. | ||
I said, we're going to talk a lot about Israel today and my crew audibly groaned and it's like, I don't want to talk about it either. | ||
I'm sick of talking about Israel too. | ||
But it's obviously the flashpoint of World War III and you got stories And there's so many stories like this where in Lebanon, U.S. envoy says conflict has escalated out of control. | ||
Now, the U.S. envoy is a man named Amos Hotchstein who was in the IDF and was born in Israel. | ||
And so, okay, the person representing America in this conflict between Lebanon and Israel is... | ||
Is an Israeli. | ||
He was born in Israel. | ||
He fought for the IDF. He's Israel first. | ||
So we don't really have a representation there. | ||
And it would be nice if an American would go talk to Lebanon and Israel and have a third party outside perspective. | ||
But we don't have that. | ||
We have an Israeli representing America. | ||
Anthony Blinken goes to Israel and says, I come here as an Israeli. | ||
You've got the oversight board now. | ||
Facebook oversight board run by an Israeli governmental person in charge of censoring or You know, has oversight over the Israel-Palestine content that's posted there. | ||
So, Israelis are in all these positions of power. | ||
They are representing America in this conflict between Israel and Lebanon. | ||
Like, this is an issue. | ||
We are not sovereign if there are no Americans representing America. | ||
It's all Israelis overseas. | ||
I mean, this is... | ||
This is a big issue. | ||
How does that intersect with Judaism? | ||
What is the intersection there? | ||
Because it's another one of these confusing, you know, blurred lines where Israel and Judaism are ostensibly separate things, but they're obviously intertwined greatly. | ||
I mean, how do we deal with this, Brother Nathaniel? | ||
I don't like being represented by Israel as an American. | ||
Well, Israel calls itself a Jewish state. | ||
Well, there you have it. | ||
unidentified
|
Israel, Jewish, racially a Jew. | |
Religiously, you subscribe to Judaism. | ||
It's all interwoven. | ||
There's nothing confusing about it. | ||
Now, it's not just Israelis. | ||
Anthony Blinken is not a dual citizen. | ||
He is the head of the Department of State, the State Department. | ||
He goes to Israel. | ||
On October 18th, a week after, you know, the whole thing with Hamas, and he announces as soon as he gets in front of the microphone, next to Satan Yahoo, and says, I come here as a Jew! | ||
That's what the bastard said! | ||
Why didn't he say, I come here as an American representing the American people and our foreign policy? | ||
He did not. | ||
How does he get away with this? | ||
Because the media is owned by all Jews. | ||
Because the lobbies have bribed and blackmailed. | ||
They are babysitters for every hack on Capitol Hill except for Thomas Massey. | ||
He's the true son of Ron Paul, not Rand. | ||
I have nothing but contempt for Rand Paul. | ||
Nothing but contempt for him. | ||
All we see is Fauci, Fauci, Fauci. | ||
To hell with Fauci! | ||
Whatever happened to end the Jewish Fed? | ||
It's only Thomas Massey that's doing this. | ||
We got a thousand Jewish lobbies. | ||
It's not just AIPAC. It's AIPAC. It's ADL. It's the Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations. | ||
It's the Zionist Organization of America. | ||
It's so many damn Jewish organizations. | ||
They are all linked together. | ||
They're legion. | ||
Like Jesus said to the demoniac, what's your name? | ||
He said, we are legion. | ||
My name is legion because we are many. | ||
It's called the synagogue of Satan. | ||
It's united. | ||
It's organized. | ||
It's universal. | ||
And it's wicked to the core. | ||
Because they crucified Christ and they have the deicidal curse and they bear the spirit of Antichrist. | ||
They run America culturally, socially, politically, financially, academically. | ||
They run every gamut, every facet of this Jew-ruined country. | ||
We have to name the names. | ||
We have to name the enemy. | ||
It's the Jew, the crucifier, the Christ-hater, the Christ-killer that runs America. | ||
This has to change. | ||
It can change with people like you, Harrison, with people like Owen Schroer. | ||
I believe in you guys. | ||
You're young. | ||
You're strong. | ||
You're calling out the evil. | ||
Now, I'm trying to help inform you what this is about. | ||
Well, see, I'm... | ||
But then, you know, I hear you say things like that, and what I can't help but think is Jews that are out there, because isn't the threat of a second holocaust, I mean, this is, or anti-Semitism, it's a control mechanism for Jews and non-Jews, right? | ||
You keep the non-Jews Like, don't talk about the evil stuff that George Soros or whoever else is doing because you're anti-Semitic and keep people scared of that phrase so they refuse to criticize you or refuse to criticize Israel out of fear of that label. | ||
It's also, you know, wielded against Jews who are told, and I know this, you know, From yourself and others who, you know, grew up in Jewish community where it's like, you know, they're told about the Holocaust, about, you know, their grandparents were scooped up in the middle of the night, you know, and this idea is put forward like they want to kill you. | ||
Everybody wants to kill you. | ||
Everybody hates you. | ||
So you have to be separate from them. | ||
You have to be with us. | ||
We're the only ones who will keep you safe because everybody out there wants to kill you. | ||
And so when I hear you say things like that, I get where you're coming from or how you're characterizing it. | ||
But then I just can't help but think that Jews who maybe think, you know, this whole Holocaust thing, it's not a threat right now. | ||
It's America. | ||
Americans don't hate Jews. | ||
This whole us versus them. | ||
But then if you have somebody going, it's the Jews, it's all the Jews, and we have to stop the Jews, then you are sort of pushing those Jewish people back into the fold where they go, oh, geez, maybe I do need to... | ||
Stick with my kind. | ||
Because these people do. | ||
You know, I don't hate Jews. | ||
I don't, you know, want to characterize all of them. | ||
And I don't want the Jews to be brainwashed and mind-controlled by powerful Jews who say, hey, if you disobey us, if you give even one ground to the anti-Semites, then, you know, they're going to kill us all and you'll be responsible for all of us dying. | ||
So, I mean, isn't there a balance there? | ||
Or do you think that... | ||
I'm not right. | ||
Isn't this threat of anti-Semitism used to keep Jews in line? | ||
And if you blame all Jews, aren't you sort of playing into that? | ||
Again, it's kind of nuanced. | ||
I don't know if I expressed that well, but what's your response to that? | ||
Well, dialing back Jewish power is going to help the Jew. | ||
The Jew's in a very, very vulnerable position now. | ||
Everyone hates the Jews now. | ||
The whole world hates the Jews. | ||
They won't say it, but they do. | ||
A lot of people saw what Benji Shapiro said. | ||
He celebrates this. | ||
Well, that brings out this hatred for these people. | ||
So you have to dial it back. | ||
But the Jews don't dial it back. | ||
They ramp it up. | ||
You take Susan Wyszycki, for instance, who banned me twice. | ||
Once from my political Real Jew News, once from my Bible with Brother, which I didn't even call out the Jew. | ||
But I was talking about Jesus Christ, and no good bitch banned me. | ||
She wouldn't even tell me why. | ||
All right, so someone tells me, hey, she's dead. | ||
Well, God killed her. | ||
Once you start censoring and preventing the gospel from being preached, St. | ||
Paul said the wrath of God comes to them to the uttermost two years before 70 A.D. Now this bitch will not allow me to preach the gospel. | ||
God gave her a year to repent. | ||
She's dead. | ||
He killed her. | ||
But does that change the Jew? | ||
Okay, so I waited a couple weeks for the mourning period and all that crap. | ||
Sitting Shiva and all that crap, okay? | ||
And I said, hey, you know, I was banned. | ||
I was just preaching the Bible. | ||
I wasn't calling out the Jews. | ||
There was nothing political. | ||
I just wanted to preach the gospel. | ||
I did it. | ||
It was very popular. | ||
I had monetization, where you have to go through hoops and circles and somersaults to get monetization. | ||
I was actually making $5,000 a month. | ||
So I said, I'd like to come back on. | ||
Probably a misunderstanding. | ||
I got an email back within an hour. | ||
It wasn't a robot. | ||
You will never come back here, they told me. | ||
Some Jew wrote that. | ||
They don't learn their lessons. | ||
They keep pushing the envelope. | ||
They keep pushing the envelope. | ||
The whole world is aghast and agony of what they're doing. | ||
You see children being burned alive, and this no good antichrist, deicidal, or cursed person says he celebrates it. | ||
Now the Jew better dial back what they're doing, because maybe this time there will be a real holocaust. | ||
We are seeing an actual holocaust. | ||
There was no holocaust. | ||
It was a hoax. | ||
These were work camps to support the war effort. | ||
The Jews that starved is because of the Allied bombing. | ||
My father showed me this, a Jew. | ||
At least he was honest about things. | ||
But he felt honestly that the Jews have a moral, spiritual higher ground than the goyim. | ||
That's how they look upon you, Harrison. | ||
Yeah. | ||
A goyim. | ||
No, it's... | ||
And look, it's like, obviously, this is where you can... | ||
...the Allied bombing. | ||
They were fed well. | ||
My father's the one who told me this. | ||
Yeah, and you know, if that is your belief, right, if you think, you know, you're superior and God basically cosigns everything you do, and that I think is such a dangerous idea, because obviously then, you know, anybody standing up against you is really standing up against God and deserves to die, basically. | ||
It's like, it's such a dangerous, really, it's the peak of racial supremacy, like far more than... | ||
You know, whatever, Jim Crow laws, where it's like, you're just not allowed to use the same water fountain. | ||
Like, this is like, if you oppose us, you are slated for death. | ||
And it's like... | ||
It's crazy. | ||
And it's YouTube, and then this article is from The Intercept. | ||
Meta's Israel policy chief tried to suppress pro-Palestinian Instagram posts. | ||
So, again, using censorship to play down or to hide the outrageous, just utterly objectionable things going on in Gaza by Israel is We can't stand for this, and we can't be silenced by claims of anti-Semitism just because it's Jews doing this. | ||
It's like, no, you call out evil, you call out badness, you call out censorship, you call out murder, no matter who it is. | ||
And that confuses and enrages people, I guess. | ||
But it doesn't seem all that complicated to me. | ||
No, it's very simple. | ||
And everyone sees that the Jews are denying us free speech. | ||
They're denying us being in the image of God. | ||
In the first chapter of Genesis, God said, this is good. | ||
This is very good. | ||
This is not so good. | ||
This is bad. | ||
It's right there in the first three chapters. | ||
But we're denied that. | ||
We can't say on Facebook or on Instagram. | ||
We can't say, this is wicked. | ||
This is evil. | ||
Because the Jew runs the whole information world. | ||
platforms, except for one, Infowars and me, Real Jew News, and my brother Nathaniel Show, and a few others. | ||
But they've got the monopoly. | ||
They are the mainstream media, where you get the propaganda, where you get the lies, where you get only what the Jew wants you to hear. | ||
They're stupid goyim. | ||
That's how the Jews look upon. | ||
They're just stupid goys. | ||
So we will tell them what they need to know. | ||
Now, once the goy says, well, hey, let's call out this evil, Facebook, Zuckerberg, and his whole Jewish collective called the Synagogue of Satan will not allow the Christian, the Gentile, to speak. | ||
This is evil. | ||
This is wicked. | ||
This is denial of our being made in the image of God. | ||
Where we are allowed and should look around our society and say, this is not good. | ||
This is evil. | ||
This is of Satan. | ||
That you won't allow us to do this. | ||
And ahead of this is Jonathan Green Black of the Anti-Defamation League. | ||
But he's just a figurehead. | ||
He is the figurehead for B'nai B'rith, which is the global glob that is the head of the synagogue of Satan today. | ||
He works for them. | ||
But it's all one collective that is preventing you and me to speak. | ||
I don't know what happens to Emperor Wars, but you have to continue, Harrison. | ||
Owen's got to continue. | ||
Alex has got to continue because they want to shut you down. | ||
Don't let them. | ||
When I say them, the Jew, the collective international Jew, it's one huge synagogue of Satan. | ||
We have to bring it down. | ||
I know how we can do it. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, so how do we do it? | |
Because again, one of the reasons why InfoWars has been so successful and been able to maintain is because we don't categorize people like that necessarily, right? | ||
We value the individual. | ||
We understand and celebrate people that stand up against the attempts by Jews or anybody else to use religion or ethnicity to try to Convince people to go along with a lie or convince people to go along with a war. | ||
I mean, these are all just levers of control. | ||
And they pull different levers depending on who they're talking to or about, right? | ||
They'll destroy white people with opioids. | ||
They'll destroy black people with crack. | ||
They just want you destroyed. | ||
They don't particularly care how it's done. | ||
So, I mean, this is... | ||
Sorry, go ahead. | ||
I'm talking to my tech. | ||
Okay, go ahead. | ||
No, yeah. | ||
So, I mean, this is one of, I think, the strengths of InfoWars is what we push is really for everybody. | ||
And we don't target one particular race or ethnic group or religion. | ||
We just point out the evil people on all sides. | ||
And look, the ADL, it's a Jewish organization. | ||
They are horrible. | ||
They censor people. | ||
They were founded to protect a rapist murderer from being lynched. | ||
I mean, there are horrible things. | ||
The fact that they're Jewish obviously plays into it. | ||
It, you know, guides some of the decisions that they make and they identify themselves as that. | ||
But we don't target the ADL because they're Jewish, right? | ||
It's is there any nuance there? | ||
Or again, it's like it seems counterproductive to me to so target the Jews when so many people in America, especially that that turns them off to the idea and makes them think that, oh, you don't really care about free speech. | ||
You're just an anti-Semite and you just hate Jews. | ||
And it's like I feel like if we if we go off of the very strict path of principled opposition to censorship, regardless of who's doing it, and start talking about an ethnic group or a population, we drive a lot of potential supporters away. | ||
Again, I'm not saying that we're not saying what we mean, but there's some nuance there, right? | ||
And at the end of the day, if these groups weren't doing censorship and getting us kicked off of platforms and all this stuff, I wouldn't have a problem with them, but it's their actions and their behavior and what they do that we oppose, right? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
Yeah, but you must have a problem with them because it's the Jew that wants to bring Alex Jones, Harrison Smith, and Owen Troyer and Impa Wars down. | ||
They want it to be extinct. | ||
Well, there's a lot. | ||
See, you're not necessarily naming the Jew, but you are exposing the conduct of the Jews. | ||
And everybody knows that the ADL is Jew. | ||
So you don't even have to say they're Jewish. | ||
Everybody knows they're Jewish. | ||
And many, many despise them. | ||
So keep on calling out the conduct. | ||
But the Jew, the collective Jew, the powerful Jew, Mary Garfinkel, Garland, but it's really Garfinkel, wants Infowars to disappear off the face of the earth. | ||
Because you're at least, I shouldn't say at least, you are calling out the conduct. | ||
Now, we all work together. | ||
You call out the conduct. | ||
That's great. | ||
I'm all for it. | ||
I'm praying for you guys. | ||
I'm praying for Alex. | ||
I care about him. | ||
I care about what they're doing to him. | ||
He's got free speech. | ||
But the Jews don't want him to have free speech. | ||
They're taking it away from him. | ||
He can say whatever he wants about Sandy Hook. | ||
Let the Jews say, well, he's wrong. | ||
Let the plaintiffs say, well, that's not true. | ||
Fine. | ||
Leave it there. | ||
But they won't leave it there. | ||
They want Alex Jones at Infowars to disappear because it was Infowars that said 9-11 was an inside job. | ||
Oh, that's the conduct. | ||
What do you mean an inside job? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, who? | |
Oh, he's talking about us. | ||
He's an anti-Semite. | ||
But he didn't even name the Jew. | ||
He was the first. | ||
He came out this COVID shot. | ||
This Bax, this clutch shot, Alex Jones, he was before anybody. | ||
He said, no, this is an mRNA. | ||
This is going to kill people. | ||
This is Pfizer and the Moderna. | ||
Oh, the Jew is saying he's an anti-Semite. | ||
He didn't even name the Jew, but he named Pfizer and he named Moderna. | ||
Damn it! | ||
unidentified
|
And the Jew says he's an anti-Semite. | |
But without him even saying the Jew, I know how the Jew thinks. | ||
I know how they react. | ||
I know how they respond. | ||
You can talk about anything. | ||
Homosexuality, transgenderism, sticking a penis up another man's ass. | ||
You can talk about any of that. | ||
You can show that on YouTube. | ||
But to say that the Jews are in a position of power, you're not allowed to say it. | ||
To call out the conduct of Pfizer and the mRNA and the clot shot, you are not allowed to say it. | ||
To say that this genocide in Israel and the burning of children alive, This Facebook Zuckerberg who's part of the synagogue of Satan says you're not allowed to say it. | ||
unidentified
|
Damn it! | |
We have to say it. | ||
Now let Infowars, and I hope you continue somehow. | ||
I don't know the legalities involved. | ||
But we have to continue. | ||
Whatever we do, you guys call out the conduct. | ||
I will name the names and I will say, how the Jew thinks, how the Jew looks upon the Goy, how they think as a collective, how they are so powerful with their babysitting collective lobby. | ||
I'll do that part. | ||
You guys do your part. | ||
And all together, whatever we do together, We will awaken the people. | ||
It's going to come back on their heads. | ||
They are in trouble. | ||
They will not dial it back. | ||
They keep on accelerating it. | ||
This escalation headline, Hochstein says it's escalating out of control. | ||
My dad taught me how to read a headline. | ||
What he means is Hezbollah is escalating it out of control, not the Jews. | ||
That's what that headline means. | ||
I can see the headline my dad showed me when I was seven years old how to read a headline. | ||
Damn it! | ||
I'm sick of it. | ||
I can't watch another child crying with his arm severed. | ||
I can't watch it anymore. | ||
I'm gonna speak out. | ||
I'm going to say it's the Jew that's doing it collectively. | ||
It's AIPAC. It's ADL. It's the presidents of major Jewish organizations that are sending bombs, phosphorus, lethal weapons, landing the war on Iran to bring us into World War III. Thank God for the leak. | ||
Thank God that there is one Christian man who leaked this because he didn't want World War III to break out at any time. | ||
So there is some God intervention here. | ||
Yeah, and again, just looking at this clip of Ben Shapiro, I mean, this is, again, my big issue. | ||
It's like if any other person said that, It's crazy. | ||
It is a crazy, crazy extremist position to say. | ||
And I don't understand how people can't see it. | ||
So, you know, people get mad at me. | ||
Half the time I'm called a Mossad agent, half the time I'm called a Nazi. | ||
But the reality is, it's like you treat Jews like anybody else. | ||
And if there's anybody of any religion, it doesn't matter. | ||
They're sitting there going, 40,000 dead children, I'm happy. | ||
I celebrate and laud that. | ||
It's like, alright, that's insane. | ||
Everybody should recognize that's insane. | ||
Half the people, it's like... | ||
Can we not just recognize evil for what it is? | ||
And I am always frustrated by the way that anti-Semitism is used to disguise these things. | ||
We've got one minute left, Brother Nathaniel. | ||
You can find Brother Nathaniel at realjewnews.com, at realbronat. | ||
Final words, sir. | ||
All right. | ||
We'll have what's called the Jewish Racial Collective, Thousand Lobbies. | ||
They control every aspect of American life, social, medically, culturally, the movies, the media, information, politically, foreign policy, domestic policy, sexual policy or sexual behavior. | ||
They control everything. | ||
There was once what's called the white Anglo-Saxon Protestant. | ||
It was white, it was European roots, and it was Christian. | ||
That was the collective that once ruled America, but not in a tyrannical way. | ||
They pretty much set the policy. | ||
But then you had the Great Watershed. | ||
We need the WASP supremacy back. | ||
I'm for it. | ||
Brother Nathaniel, thank you so much for joining us, sir. | ||
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
InfoWars.com forward slash show. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, I have only been excited about a supplement product this much, and all our products are great, a few times in the last couple decades. | ||
This is so game-changing, and we knew about this years ago, but I wanted to wait until we were able to get you the very best. | ||
And our sponsor, the great folks at Bigly, have come out with Ultimate CMOS. | ||
Now, this particular type of CMOS has been all the rage for years, and we got it from one of the top companies in the nation that let us private label it. | ||
They're top-rated. | ||
This is a concentrate of a CMOS that doesn't just have this special type of bioavailable iodine, but all these other vitamins and minerals and then trace elements, So it's the way the sea moss produces and grows this that makes it Probably the top superfood in the world right now. | ||
So you're supporting the broadcast, you're getting a top CMOS, and of course you're empowering your body, your immune system, and so much more. | ||
Now the big one is the iodine. | ||
The type of iodine in this is extremely bioavailable, and then again it has all these other vitamins and minerals and trace elements and things that are connected to it. | ||
Your whole metabolic system. | ||
Then it works for your immune system. | ||
I've got a whole giant list here. | ||
Boosts energy levels, improves mental health, supports joint and muscle health, improves skin health, promotes healthy digestion, boosts immune system, supports thyroid health, and it's rich in nutrients. | ||
It's got it all. | ||
A, C, K, iron, iodine, potassium, magnesium, and just a whole bunch of wild stuff. | ||
Because if you just get Normal vitamins are synthetic and don't work very well. | ||
Even if you get organic, but they're not naturally produced in a plant, whereas they're connected to all these other cofactors, it just doesn't have the effect. | ||
This has it all. | ||
This type of CMOS is amazing. | ||
When you go to the AlexJonesStore.com, you're also ensuring that even if InfoWars gets shut down on November 13th, which it could, it's all the news if you missed it, We will continue on with great sponsors like thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
So it's a win-win. | ||
Get a great product at a great price. | ||
It's 40% off, by the way. | ||
Support the broadcast one way or another. | ||
It's up to you whether we're able to do this. | ||
So we try to bring you great products that you're going to love so you want to reorder them. | ||
Go to thealexjonesstore.com and get Ultimate CMOS today. | ||
And while you're there, there are now over 100 awesome T-shirt, hoodie, ball cap designs, and more at thealexjonesstore.com that have these powerful messages that spread the word of liberty. | ||
It helps you meet like-minded people. | ||
And again, it's a major sponsor that's going to be critical for me staying on the air one way or another. | ||
So we're doing a fundraiser right now through our sponsors to ensure that the globalists that are so desperate to silence us when President Trump is president-elect or if Kamala steals it, that they are pulling out all the stops to get us off the air. | ||
So I try to make it a win-win. | ||
You get a great product at a great price, and you keep us on the air. | ||
Now, it's 40% off for one bottle right now. | ||
40% off for one bottle. | ||
It's over 40% when you get two and even more when you get three. | ||
So check it out. | ||
This is a heavy bottle. | ||
It is just filled with these bad boys. | ||
I'll show people an overhead shot of this. | ||
And you take one or two a day of these, and it just does incredible things for your whole body. | ||
Trust me. | ||
Get it. | ||
Just like our information's game-changing and tomorrow's is today, this is probably the ultimate superfood out there from one of the best sources, and it supports the broadcast, a 360 win. | ||
So get the hoodies. | ||
Get the t-shirts. | ||
Check out all the new great designs. | ||
New ones being added daily. | ||
Get Ultimate CMOS. Check out some of the other amazing supplements while you're there at thealexjonesstore.com, and then we're going to be able to stay on air. | ||
In the face of the New World Order, it's amazing. | ||
Take action now. |