Greg Reese and Unknowns allege Joe Biden’s July 25, 2024 withdrawal memo is a forgery, possibly AI-generated via Eleven Labs, citing visual anomalies like rubbery facial features and inconsistent earlobes. Matt Weber and Psyop Cop mock Kamala Harris’s nomination as a "DEI hire," questioning paid protesters and fund transfers from Biden’s campaign to hers. Callers speculate deepfakes, RICO charges against Democrats, and Bohemian Grove rituals, while hosts dismiss some claims but push conspiracy theories about Trump’s assassination attempt. The episode ends with Alex Jones’s live appearance tease and InfoWars MD supplement ads, blending politics with fringe financial advice. [Automatically generated summary]
Joe Biden hasn't been seen since last Wednesday in Las Vegas, four days after the assassination attempt on President Trump. four days after the assassination attempt on President Trump.
The signature on his memo announcing that he is dropping out of the 2024 election has been proven to be a forgery.
And according to the artificial intelligence voice app, Eleven Labs, the recent alleged phone call from Biden was created using the app.
unidentified
I know yesterday's news was surprising and hard for you to hear, but it was the right thing to do.
I know it's hard because you poured your heart and soul into me.
Okay, let's just go on old Eleven Labs and see if that's really all they probably used for this.
Let me ask you, how many times you guys made masks for presidents to distract the audience Like, are there duplicates out there as well that we don't know about?
We can't know the answer to that question.
There's, you know, I don't know.
unidentified
Saddam had all these.
Is that what you're talking about?
We have a picture of Saddam in a boat on the Bosphorus or something with his 26 doubles.
president and wondering who's running the country, U.S.
presidents have been missing for decades.
All we've had in the White House for our entire lifetime is a puppet frontman for the military-industrial complex and the big bank bureaucrats who have turned America into Murder Incorporated.
The forces running this country are still in charge.
They are just looking for a new puppet to fool the masses into thinking America is the land of the free.
unidentified
It's Thursday, July 25th in the year of our Lord 2024.
And you're listening to the American Journal with your hosts, Matt Weber and Reese Marrero.
I think it's time to blow this thing, get everybody in the stuff together.
You are listening to Reese Morero and Matt Weber here on the American Journal.
We're here filling in for Harrison Smith, and we've got a great show for you this morning.
Now, Kamala is the presumptive Democrat nominee, and the party of democracy has gone a long way, a real, real long way, to subvert the will of the people.
12, let's go ahead and roll that. - Propologists distinguish between two different types of society when it comes to sort of internal feelings about things that you have done wrong, what they call guilt-based societies and shame-based societies.
So guilt-based societies are internally directed.
They are typically linked with Judaic and Christian moral systems.
These would be systems where you feel guilty before God because you have violated God's moral scruples.
And that's typically what it means.
You feel like an internal sense of guilt.
Whether or not anybody knows about what you did, you feel internal guilt.
A shame-based society is one in which society sets the standard.
And society makes you feel ashamed, and makes you quote-unquote lose face.
This is very much associated by cultural anthropologists with countries like Japan or China.
The sort of idea is that you will be shamed into doing the right thing.
Now, something has happened in America over the course of the last several decades as religion has declined.
Guilt-based society has shifted into shame-based society, which has shifted into a post-shame society.
So, it used to be a guilt-based society where, you know, people felt an internal obligation to do the moral thing.
On the political level, what this meant is that politicians felt an actual sense of responsibility to solve the problems they were charged with solving.
Not that they had to be shamed into doing it as much, but they felt like an internal moral compulsion to try to do things that they'd been tasked with doing.
That they actually had a moral duty to do the right thing.
And then, since the decline of religion, since the decline of people believing in moral absolutes, people started to believe in a shame-based society, and political correctness basically replaced, in our moral system, God.
People were going to shame you into saying or feeling certain things.
And that, of course, has sort of reared its ugly head again in wokeness.
This idea that you can be shamed into using the proper pronouns.
You have to be shamed into saying untrue things about how America is a white supremacist society.
A shame-based society, which is the reason why you see people put flag emojis in their Twitter profiles, or why you see people put the dumb lawn signs on their lawn that talk about, in this house we believe... That's a shame-based society.
Because, again, it's all directed toward the public, And what the public thinks of you.
So we shifted from a guilt-based society in which your own internal moral standard, which typically had been shaped by your moral upbringing, made you feel certain ways about doing what you were supposed to do, into a shame-based society in which the society itself is going to shame you into doing things.
And you would lose face if you didn't do those things, had to post the black square during BLM, and you had to proclaim your solidarity with people who are rioting, or you would be shamed in public for not having done so.
Alright, so now that we've gotten a good glimpse and a good idea of where we're at in society as a shame-based society, something that I think a lot of us, it resonates with a lot of people, right?
We understand that we're in a place that if you do something wrong, someone's trying to pull their phone out, they're trying to capture you on it, and they're trying to make you famous on Twitter, you know, or X. Yeah, we're collectively addicted to this idea of spectacle.
entrance of Vice President Kamala Harris into the presidential campaign, and she has now secured enough delegates to become the nominee, you're gonna look real crazy being on the other side of that line, particularly as a person of color. you're gonna look real crazy being on the other side of that line, But really as anyone who claims to have any connection to the culture, you're gonna look real weird and real lonely on that side.
Now, you know, joking aside, you know, we can say superficially, OK, we're again in a place where we take a lot of superficial traits of candidates.
And because those traits, right, resonate with certain voters, those are now paramount characteristics of someone.
And despite the fact that those aren't even actual characteristics, right?
If we define a characteristic, right?
Rather than a characterism, right?
Or something that someone does, right?
Little antics, things like that.
You know, character, right?
Is the decisions that you make under pressure, right?
And yeah, those characteristics, right?
It is really sad because if you take a look at at some of the things that Kamala Harris has been responsible for right in this administration, the borders are right.
That is huge news today, and I'm sure that people watching this show at home have either read about it by now or will hear about it before the end of the day.
But there is retrospective history in the making right happening where.
Kamala Harris, who A, was appointed by Joe Biden, accepted the appointment by Biden, is now saying that she never had anything to do with the border.
Well, and that's true, right?
She really did have nothing to do with the border.
Like, if I'm getting ready for, like, an argument, or I gotta, like, get really pissed off or something like that, like, you just turn that on, and it's amazing.
This might be our new intro song for the rest of the election season every morning.
unidentified
We are living in an Indonesian world.
I love all you ladies out in the land.
But I'm a gay cowboy.
I only want a man.
And that song's for you, Kamala.
I hope, Kamala, if you're watching this, I really wish you would consider...
Letting me in your cabinet, speaking for you, as a gay cowboy, I can do more for you than any straight cowboy could ever do.
That's the truth.
And I really think that, with my help, that we could transition multiple children, thousands of children, and get them the gender reassignment surgery that they want.
So if you're ready to get mastectomies and bottom surgery for the babies, call on me, Kamala.
I'm just blown away by the fact that you never see in these Alex Stein videos any of the city council members just like You know, losing their straight face, just like, laughing.
Being a city council member has to be one of the most, like, mind-numbingly boring, just full of drudgery jobs there is.
I would be thrilled, even if I didn't even agree with Alex Stein's politics, I would be so thrilled to just have this little gremlin come into my space and just, like, take over the room for, like, two or three minutes.
Just make my day, like, more interesting, at least.
At least something happens besides shuffling paperwork and I don't know.
And I finally found in my stack of articles here, breaking news, the Trump campaign files an FEC complaint against Biden and Harris over the transfer of campaign funds.
Donald Trump's presidential campaign filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission on Tuesday against Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, which accused the president and vice president of violating campaign finance laws by transferring Biden's campaign funds to Harris' campaign.
I think what we should do is get a panel of people together, and I think that we should Take them to trial.
I think we should take them to trial and then rush them to jail as they're trying to do with Donald Trump and campaign, violating campaign finance law, right, with Stormy Daniels.
Yeah, I mean, honestly, I think this is pretty refreshing to see given the fact that It feels like Trump and his campaign have been on the receiving side of so much lawfare for so long, for years.
From the support that Kamala is seeing to, you know, it was funny, yesterday I saw that there were about 822 people watching one of Kamala's first speeches where she spoke at a sorority.
And then someone said in the comments right below, they said, there are 822 people waiting in line for the bathroom at the Trump rally.
There's really only so much you can do when you're having to pay people.
There are other reports as well of people who are protesting with Hamas protesters.
About 200 devices were found on a wireless network and an IT anon had said that about 200 users were also in attendance at one of Joe Biden's last speeches.
And I would just be very curious to see, though, the distribution between the two sides of the aisle.
Which side does it more?
Because I've seen it with my own eyes.
Before I joined the crew here at InfoWars, I didn't You know, I was pretty awake before I came on board, but I didn't really witness with my own eyes the mechanics of, like, leftist activism.
And until I became a cameraman here, until I actually went out in the field, I remember this one specific time where me and a co-worker, we went downtown during the Roe vs. Wade protests.
How else are they going to get there?
kicking off like a couple years ago when they were going to repeal it.
And so there's an on-the-ground aspect to astroturfing, right?
Typically campaigns need to have this real-life event that is going to resonate with everyone who encounters the protest, the whatever, right, these people are engaging in.
And then there's the online perception as well, right?
And ActBlue recently switched around their donation policies where there are fewer verification steps that need to be implemented in order to get a donation or to pass money to a political candidate.
You can get away with murder by going to InfoWarsStore.com right now.
Just to remind you, the roof, the things are coming undone at InfoWars.
For instance, you and I are hosting today.
And because we can't afford to pay the people We can afford to pay them.
But if you go to InfoWarsStore.com right now, you're going to get a heck of a deal.
I'm not going to lie to you and say InfoWars is going to make it through the breach here.
You know, hey, behind the scenes, we're making plans within plans, right?
And in some form, Alex will always be on the air, but...
InfoWars may not be around forever, and what's important for you, aside from the information, is that if InfoWars isn't here, the products that we tell you about and that people call in about, despite the fact that we tell them specifically, hey, no plugs, dude, just get to the point when we're screening calls, right?
Everyone who's on hold and calling in now, right, is going to get that because I've screened your calls.
Yes, we know the products are amazing.
What you need to know is that this may be one of the last opportunities that you have to try a product.
unidentified
And what I mean by this is you've heard, you know, that turmeric or that iodine, right, is great for your health.
You've thought to yourself, well, I don't necessarily need to.
Maybe I'll just, you know, if that ache or pain, you know, becomes too annoying, too nagging, I'll just go down to the local drugstore and get the supplement.
To me, the values of diversity, equality, inclusion are literally, and that's not kidding, the core strengths of America.
That's why I'm proud to have the most diverse administration history that taps into the full talents of our country and starts at the top with the vice president.
...is the idea that the person you're doing the prank to is, you know, they believe what's going on.
They're with it, with reality, and they actually buy into your truth for just a brief period of time, and then you bring it crashing down after you turn and you reveal, like, haha, you know, you punk them.
So for anybody who caught the extended broadcast yesterday, what I actually really appreciated about what they did, Chase brought up the clip of Clinton.
I don't know if you saw that part.
Did you watch that part where he brought out the clip of Bill Clinton making like an address to the nation and he played They basically were rolling, they were recording in the five minutes before they went live.
And they compared the decorum, the overall just mannerisms of Bill Clinton as he was preparing to sit in that exact same chair and address the nation in a very similar way versus Biden, what we see now.
And it was just like, you know, Owen was joking.
He's just like, oh my gosh, this has got me wanting Bill Clinton back.
Like, good God, I'll take anything over this guy.
Bill Clinton was, you know, he was taking it very seriously.
The teleprompter was actually oriented correctly back then in the 90s.
So if you'll notice in this clip here, with Biden's address last night, he was like, looking up, he was just like, my fellow Americans!
This guy, this guy got like- Qualities on the dark triad well real real dark triad qualities here is what I'm getting those vibes Absolutely, and I mean DTV the thing is I just it's tough because you see someone like this and However, they lived their life good or bad you do kind of have to just take things into consideration like dude this guy is like oh my
I love what the crew's doing.
For the radio listeners, they are basically green screening your mouth.
They're trying to, like, make it seem like, ooh, okay, it was a really dumb idea I had for this art, but I want to make it seem really deep, so I'm just gonna remain really ambiguous here, and I'm gonna let them do the talking, they're gonna talk their way into this art sale.
So, we got about four minutes to kill, and it looks like U-Haul has been waiting for more than four minutes, so U-Haul from Spring Patch wants to talk about the Democrats.
U-Haul, what do you got for us?
unidentified
Springfield.
Now, save yourself the trip to the Art Gallery.
That's nothing more but a liberal It's just a bad, it's just a social, I mean, it's almost like a country club minus the golf clubs, but it's for liberals.
Alright, alright, alright, well, we'll have this debate on a later day, okay?
unidentified
Yeah, I know, just think Balenciaga because that's like fashion art, but it, you know, it just, it almost goes down that rabbit hole, so it's like, You're not missing much is what I'm saying.
So it's just, you know, it's brutal.
Yeah.
So just save yourself the grief or whatever.
And it's all just basically just a liberal bastard where they all just rub elbows and it's a CNBC kind of thing.
So I don't know really whether or not if it's just a one-time thing that you do and never go back, probably.
No, but one of the things I want to call about, yeah, morning, gentlemen, is that I was meaning to call before the shooting.
But, Gary, how that day, July 13th, actually, in 1960, JFK accepted his nomination.
So wait, wait, wait, before you go on, before you go on, was that in fact the same day?
So I heard when screening calls earlier this week, it was a call that unfortunately did not make it to air.
But one of the callers called in and said, hey, listen up, the day that JFK received the Democratic nomination for candidate for president, right, the day that he secured that was the same day that Trump was shot in the ear.
I wonder if there's going to be some more parallels that we find similar to the JFK-Lincoln connection.
That's not something I've really taken the time to do.
I don't know if U-Haul has done any similar research, but that would be very interesting as time goes on to see if there's any kind of parallels with other assassinations like that.
Right, and so it's like if there were some other like profound connections that would again like really really lead me to believe that Again, someone with really high IQ and, like, a really bad sense of humor, like, was in on this, and that reeks of the CIA.
You know, in preparation for this show, we hardly ever go into some of the details, but late last night, I had replied to a text from Reese.
Reese and I were actually coordinating what we were going to do on the show today, And Rhys tossed out the idea of talking to Mike Adams on the show about him profiling the sound signatures of the shots that were fired that day.
And while that does remain very interesting, there are a lot of confounding variables in my mind that could get in the way of an honest interpretation of the events.
in the way of sound signatures, like reverberations, you know, reflections of sound, quality of microphone, quality of recording, right?
There are so many different variables that go into that.
It's like, you know, we can talk about it, but I don't know.
And, you know, as I laid down, as I laid my head on the pillow, I started thinking like, okay, like, let's give them the benefit of the doubt.
You're Could there have been a second shooter?
Could it be that Crooks never fired a shot, was assassinated, and there was some guy who's a great shot trying to give Trump a warning shot in the ear?
Like, hey, buddy, they purposefully shot him in the ear.
So number one, you've got central banks now starting to buy it.
By the tons, right?
It's a lot.
You've now got Chinese citizens being encouraged to not just buy gold, but buy silver.
Because China and Russia want to destroy the Western banks.
And the Western banks, JPMorgan Chase and HSBC, have the largest number of naked short positions on the planet.
On the planet.
I think between the two of them, they have over 900 million ounces of silver in short position.
Well, only 1.2 billion ounces of silver is mined every year globally.
So they've got almost the entire annual production in a short position.
That means when the price goes up, these banks lose money hand over fist in multiples.
China knows this, which is why they're encouraging all of their citizens now to buy not just gold, but buy silver, because that creates more demand.
Every time silver goes up in price, the Western banks lose money in multiples, because they're on the wrong side of the transaction.
They want to do it to destroy the West and they want to do it to make a financial gain.
Both of those in their minds are legitimate enough reasons to do something, right?
But let's look at silver because that's what we're allocated into right now because the ratio between gold and silver points towards silver.
It's outperforming.
Where were we just four years ago?
1191.
But now, since then, we've gone from 1191 to almost 30 in the last four years.
See, the trend is accelerating because the geopolitical dynamics are causing its growth.
It's not just a flight for safety.
It's not just a way to preserve and protect your freedoms and get out of These unified ledgers and these social credit scoring systems and this digital money, you're getting something tangible that actually doesn't just grow.
It's growing tremendously.
It's up like 40% in four months.
That's amazing.
But you also have something that can maintain your freedoms, Alex.
That's the tangible intangible, which is as our freedoms are eroded.
Yeah, no, um, let's talk a little bit, uh, before we go out to calls here, um, just about the deluge, right?
I think we're gonna hit calls maybe in the next segment.
We got three minutes to, uh, to speculate about this.
But, um, I wanna talk a little bit about, um, The overwhelming amount of time that people who tune into left-wing media, right, how much time they've been exposed to negative coverage of Donald Trump.
And this is a kind of a weird request for the crew who might be digging around.
Um, but there is a, a McBreen piece, a McBreen piece, an intro that, um, we don't need to necessarily play it.
If you guys find it before I'm done talking about it, um, you can put some B-roll up, but it's called Hollywood Message to Trump.
Hollywood Message to Trump.
And it was a piece that, uh, Darren McBreen made during the Trump administration.
that showed an overwhelming amount of celebrities and people who were in the in crowd in Hollywood, right, the same people who have flocked to Kamala to donate now that she is the presumptive nominee, they were talking about, you know, wanting to kill Trump.
Whenever someone says the phrase, I've been thinking an awful lot about, right, my mind immediately wanders to completing that phrase by saying, I've been thinking a lot about blowing up the White House because I watched Madonna say that.
Well, the thing that's interesting about that is that statements like that are so typical of the leftist psychology and that they will They'll just kind of, like, I don't know, daintily throw things out there, just kind of like, oh, I've been thinking a lot about... And they'll just kind of do this very passive form of seeding ideas out into the population through media like that.
It's very typical of leftist psychology to be not as direct, to kind of go the more passive, less aggressive route.
And, you know, for people who claim to be liberal, right?
Learned.
People who understand things, right?
Well, I'm a MAGA dude, and I understand that There is a phenomenon called small effects theory, right?
Where if you're broadcasting a message to a thousand people, 999 people are going to get that message, but one person, it's just not going to click with them and they're going to take it the wrong way.
So when you watch the video of Biden at the Oval Office, now if you zoom in to his face, but close enough where you can see his shoulders, There are, I found three anomalies, like if he was in front of a green screen.
If you look at his left side, when he moves around, right around that window, There's like a little glitch going on, but once you see it, you cannot see it.
You know, Savox, and so let's maybe delve a little bit deeper into the implications of using a green screen versus actually taping in the Oval Office, right?
What do you think the reason would be, and do you just see that as something nefarious, the use of a green screen over perhaps taping in the Oval Office?
Does that indicate something to you?
unidentified
Perhaps that he wasn't at the Oval Office.
Maybe he was sleeping somewhere else or maybe they have him in captivity somewhere else.
I don't know.
It just captured my mind because I couldn't sleep last night just thinking about it.
And I couldn't find anybody else talking about it.
And outside of the teleprompter, which I think we've correctly identified, right, the anomaly that you saw there, if you were to take a look at what was happening on the other shoulder, we could attribute that to a couple of things previously.
Perhaps it's artifacts that get kind of baked into a video signal as it's encoded and compressed, sent out to the internet.
He was streaming, and again, there were hundreds of people watching, right?
So, you know, that could have really overloaded the servers, right?
So there is that aspect of it.
But, you know, in my mind, if we're talking, you know, gold jacket, green jacket, you know, I don't know who really cares.
But, you know, whether or not it was in the Oval Office doesn't bother me too much.
It's, again, a little bit of this idea of the reason why time-shifting to me, like the ordeal with his watch not being right, right?
This displays the mental fitness of Joe Biden, right?
Is he fit enough to stay up past 8pm?
Is he fit enough to fulfill his duties as President of the United States?
And ultimately, right, if he really does want to do good by this country, I think he would step down.
Despite the fact that I know Kamala Harris sucks.
I would not want her as president, right?
I don't really want her to be the first female president of the United States.
I think that that should be for a more respectable person, right?
And I just think that it would totally suck, you know, in 100 years to have $100 or like some type of bill with Kamala's face on it because then we got to look at her dumbass smile forever, right?
Like that would totally suck.
But yeah, no.
I couldn't say one way or the other, you know, if I care, right, if it was filmed in the Oval Office or not, right?
unidentified
Yeah, and you're right.
Thanks for your opinion, because it was just, you know, my first thought.
But now that you mentioned that, yeah, it might be something else, or it doesn't matter.
But we're glad that you brought it up, because if you were thinking about it, it means that a thousand people who are listening right now who didn't call in about it were probably thinking the same thing.
You know?
So, um, Savox, thanks for giving us a call.
We're gonna go ahead and move on to, uh, Marcus from Texas.
There is potentially a hand anomaly with his hands.
Just watch his hands as much as you can.
When he touches the tips, when the tips of his fingers touch together, it seems like I was seeing, not to be wrong, like That his hands were digital and there was no skin making contact with skin.
It just looked like there was a gap still between his fingertips as they were touching.
David Wilcox On AI00:08:34
unidentified
I'm thinking along the lines of a deep fake, and there was stuff with his mouth too, but that's just Joe Biden's weird in any way, so I don't want to go there.
Honestly, as a reptile who wears a skin suit, I think he's pulling it off very well.
No, you know again we could maybe attribute that again to How this video was encoded Sometimes again computers are looking for things like repeating pixels that they can save space In a video data stream, but wow the way that he slowly Crosses the fingers like that.
I just find it interesting this debate on whether Joe Biden's address last night was deepfaked or not.
I don't think it actually was.
I kind of fall into that camp personally.
I know that the models exist out there for AI.
They're way, way more, in case the audience doesn't understand this yet, but the models available to the general public are Decades.
And I use that word very specifically.
Decades behind what they actually have.
So I do allow for the fact that extremely sophisticated visual AI, like video AI, exists that would be able to pull off a very, very convincing presentation.
Way more convincing than what you can get with Runway or Dolly or whatever.
And notice, just to add to what you're saying, that publicly available AI models will no longer feature faces or depictions of people who are in politics, right?
It's a violation in a lot of cases.
But if you have the OG model, right, where you can train it on their faces and there's no inhibition for the AI to say no, right, what you could come up with.
There's a debate there, but that's for another time.
I make a lot of thumbnails, and I've actually run into that roadblock several times when I want to actually just find a picture of Trump or Biden or Kamala.
Actually, just yesterday, I was trying to make a thumbnail involving Kamala, And I was using mid-journey and it doesn't let you do that.
They actually rolled out a policy where...
They don't allow public figures and politics in this upcoming election to be featured in any images whatsoever.
So there's a lot of restrictions on that.
But to wrap up my point, though, I acknowledge the extremely sophisticated video AI exists.
However, I just don't I don't see just kind of from like a strategy standpoint from the Democrats right now.
I mean, he streams for four hours at a time and just goes, just goes in on every, on, on everything that y'all talk about, but from his perspective, and he often, often referenced the shadow of Ezra, um, which is best selling.
You know, everything is sunshine and rainbows and you think you know what you know, but you don't until you get out of college and really start, you know, kind of doing your thing or getting to the real world, start paying your own bills, realize how much you're being taxed.
Then you look at what's what the tax money is going towards and you say, hold on.
We're not making super soldiers out of shrimp, okay?
And so many student loan programs are just so forgiving in the sense that, A, it's a very low interest rate, typically.
Now, I don't know if it's changed since I got out of school in 2012, but I was able to pay off student loans that I had, you know, by moving back in with my folks.
And, you know, There's a stigma that's attached to that.
Well, my question was if the RICO could be applied, you know, because so you got the Democrat Party donors, you know, riding the talking points and they passed them down to The mainstream news media and then they give those to the news anchors and they inform the street muscle.
Is that like the hierarchy of the mob or, you know, can that be applied?
Or they've even gone as far as saying, you know, let's put a bullet, you know, the democratic donors need to put a bullet in this guy.
It seems as if the Democrats typically lead with the attacks, right?
And as Trump supporters, oh my goodness, right?
If we were to talk about the Trump administration, again, the multiple things I think about at night, aside from a foe or a second shooter, I was thinking a little bit about information streams, streams of information that people consume.
It's like, at the end of the Trump administration, the fatigue of the TDS was setting in with me, just because time and time again, I I felt personally attached to Donald Trump, right?
As someone who worked at Infowars.
And I felt that way because a lot of times it's like Trump would be attacked in the media for something that he did or didn't do, right?
He didn't do it and they made it up.
Or he did do something but then they misinterpreted it, right?
And that led me to a place where I felt like I was constantly defending him.
Right.
And that made it really difficult for, you know, I think a lot of Trump supporters to really stay stalwart.
Right.
And despite the fact that, you know, it's a famous hammer brand and everything like that, it's difficult to just keep nailing things into place.
Right.
I guess the point that I'm making is that TDS exists on both sides, right?
We were getting fatigued having to defend him a whole bunch.
The Democrats, you know, just were going ham.
And a lot of the people who turned out to vote for Biden, I don't think that they actually liked Biden.
I don't think that they really paid attention to him.
I don't think that he ran a campaign that was remarkable in any way, shape, or form.
I think that what happened was people who consume content, whether fictional or non-fiction, right, if it comes from an outlet that's left-leaning, meaning any major Hollywood outlet or any liberal news network, anything that leans right of like the Daily Wire, right, or something like that, I don't know, maybe they think that's far right.
But they are pretty, you know, pretty neutral, right?
Their hot takes are, you know, usually pretty vanilla.
What I'm getting is that those people were inundated, right, with all of this Trump is bad, right?
It went into their escape shows, right?
The shows that they go to escape reality, right?
They could no longer escape reality because Trump was there 24-7, just living rent-free in their heads.
And when you take a look at that, right, a lot of people are saying, well, I'm frustrated with Trump.
Well, what are you frustrated with Trump about, right?
Oh, he said bad thing.
Oh, yeah, but the economy is doing gangbusters.
Like, we're nailing it right now.
And you're upset with that.
And so you're going to go vote for the other guy because you're just sick of seeing Trump in the headlines.
You're sick of seeing Trump on the shows.
And they're getting, you know, we take a look at, we understand how much media people are consuming a day.
It's an unhealthy amount.
No matter what side of the news that you look at, right, we are so tuned in to This view of the world where if it bleeds, it leads, right?
It needs to be sensational to catch our attention, and we just get an unending feed of these stories and hot takes all day, every day, right?
And so I agree with you on that, right?
I'm sorry, I just went into just a tangent out of left field, Jake.
I'm sorry, I went everywhere and anywhere with you.
Jake, stay on the line.
We'll wrap up with your call here and we'll get Reese's thoughts on whether or not we can make a Rico case out of this on the other side here.
Tune in to the American Journal.
If you tune out, there's one place you can go.
It's InfoWarsStore.com.
That's right.
unidentified
That's where I go.
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your hosts Matt Weber and Reese Marrero.
So, um, on the, on the other side, Rico is racketeering influx, influence, corrupt organizations.
So if you have a model giving an order, giving an order to underlings, that is the same thing as the democratic party, democratic party, writing the talking points and passing them down to their descent, to their, you know, underlings.
I mean, it's kind of cut and dry in my eyes, but I'm not a legal scholar, you know?
You know, and so I think what we're delving into too is a lot of what is unwritten, right?
A lot of the messages that they signal, you know, for all of the crap that the Democrats, you know, pile onto the Republicans for dog whistle this, dog whistle that.
They've got dog whistles in both hands, okay?
Let's not kid around.
So, Jake, we're right there with you.
We're going to be following this, you know, and see where it goes as new information is revealed.
Thanks, as always, for giving us a call from the OH.
And it's something that we've all been able to observe, especially since politics heated up in the 2015-2016 era with liberals in particular.
And that the liberal strategy of doing things is they only see reality through the lens of power.
Power acquisition.
And when you see reality through that lens, you, especially with mass media being what it is and being able to spin things and just create narratives out of thin air, What they've been doing for, gosh, almost 10 years very intensely is basically weaponizing weakness.
Weaponizing, not necessarily weakness per se, but they take these minority groups and then they weaponize them by spinning up these narratives that, oh, they need all this extra help and this and that about them.
And then they use that as a club by which to beat their opposition.
They go, Oh, you're uncaring, you're unsympathetic if you don't fall in with the plight of these people.
And they just use people for the sake of power acquisition.
And so it just blows my mind that more people don't understand this, especially now in the year 2024, after we've had, like I said, a whole decade of witnessing how they do business, the leftists and the Democrats.
It's exactly what you said.
It's like, We're not judging people, or at least leftists don't seem to judge people by the content of their character.
They only go off of their immutable characteristics, and I think that is seriously one of the most cheap things you could reduce someone to.
It's so cheap, but again, it's a very Luciferian lens.
To view reality.
It's power and power only.
Whereas, you know, conservatives traditionally are beholden to a higher power, where we don't see things through only power, you know?
We judge people by the content of their character.
It's, you know, the fruits of your labor.
What are your fruits?
Are you producing anything?
And are you friendly?
Are you good?
Do you have love in your heart?
It's just so black and white, honestly, Andrew, and it's very black and white.
Yeah, no.
Yeah, that's that was not intentional.
But it's like what I mean by that is like now it's just so obvious.
It's like you either align with people who, you know, are in alignment with MLK's message or you're not.
And I mean, I don't know.
Do you think it's kind of just we're past the point where we can make more people see?
What I'm saying is that superficial diversity, right, for the merit of that in and of itself, the fact that on camera she looks like a black person, right, that is wrong.
And I think everyone agrees with that.
We can get more into this topic and delve a little bit deeper into the crux of the argument there.
On the other side, again, Matt Weber to my right, and I am Rhys Marrero.
unidentified
We're here, InfoWars, for your entertainment and pleasure.
And so for just one supplement, the price of one discounted supplement a month that you're already going to take, that you've been thinking about trying for years and years, you can sponsor a Reese today.
Also, corny weirdo, now that we're talking about, uh, uh, really the anatomy and thinking about it, you know, I saw this meme, um, talking about the, the different generational divide, and it's like, Gen X, like, I cannot believe that, like, I, I did my hair that way, and, like, millennials are like, oh my gosh, like, I can't believe that, like, I was goth emo, and, like, you know, the, the Zoomers are like, I can't believe I cut my dick off.
It's like, oh, that that slaps right, but for the wrong reasons.
And so you know, this is like an undo button for the whole.
Vaginoplasty rhinoplasty vaginoplasty is that that's what they called it on South Park, and that's the only way I will choose to acknowledge it.
Yeah no this is very concerning and it will be very interesting so we joke about the whole trans like ctrl z for trans kind of thing just to kind of give these people an extra an extra shot uh but i think that i have to wonder uh if no i know you like pcs over max I have to wonder if this will be used as a possible solution for the fertility crisis that's pervading right now.
Because that is something that keeps me up at night.
It really is concerning.
If you just look into this, this is a whole rabbit hole in of itself.
There's so many vectors affecting the male fertility crisis in particular.
But sperm counts falling, you can see this on graphs where it's just so obvious.
We are basically careening towards a reality not, uh, unsimilar from Children of Men, that documentary.
No, but it's, uh, we're, we're headed towards that reality quicker than we think.
And I have to wonder if this body of research is being done to possibly remedy that because What they also found actually, and I really wish I printed this out as well, was they have found that in the testes of mice and also humans, men, they found microplastics in every single sample.
So they had like 40 or 50 samples and they didn't expect to find this.
They found microplastics in every single one.
That's very telling.
That's actually way worse than you think.
Microplastics are another very serious vector for the fertility crisis, and they have found microplastics in the most remote areas of the world.
I don't know if you know about this, Matt, but they found microplastics in Antarctica.
They found it at the highest peaks in the Swiss Alps.
They found it in places where you would never even, where people haven't even really set foot before.
And so the reason is, it's funny that you say that.
I was listening to Annie Jacobson's book about the space race, essentially, not the space race, but DARPA, Pentagon's brain.
And they are talking about getting pilots to 90,000 feet with the Oxcart program.
And they talk about all the little phenomenon that aerospace surgeons are trying to figure out whether or not like is it the pilot being delusional at 90,000 feet because of lacks of oxygen or are these they're different phenomena and these these pilots would would report that like all these little specks would start going up into their vision.
And what they deduced was that it's actually dead bugs, right, in the upper atmosphere.
And their mass is so light that they are perpetually kept up in the upper atmosphere, right?
The carcasses of dead bugs have been swept up by updrafts and things like that.
And so that's actually, in my mind, how these microplastics are getting around the planet, right?
At a certain point, right, when they become microplastics, right, they become, they're broken down small enough to where they're easily picked up by the wind, right?
And then they're rained down on terrain when they become condensation nuclei that interface with clouds and create rain.
Right?
Incidentally, right?
I'm sure.
But in other ways, right?
There are microplastics now floating all around the planet, right?
And the biggest part, right?
We were talking about the fact that there are plastics in testicles, right?
Which is alarming in and of itself.
But plastics in the body are enough to disrupt the endocrine system, right?
To disrupt hormones.
Your hormones.
It all comes down to hormones.
So again, if we were to take anything away from this conversation, if there's anything that listeners could take away from this conversation, there are a few very small habits that people can make to really start eliminating plastics from their body.
Number one, instead of having a plastic water bottle every time you go to drink bottled water.
Try to fill, you know, with filtered water.
We sell filtered water, right?
You could use glass, you could use an aluminum container, but try not to use a plastic container, even if it's a reusable plastic container, because those still have PFOAs, PFAS, other types of things other than BPA that end up in your system.
We understand, you know, what plastic is and what it does to the body.
And again, so replacing your drinking gourd, replacing the underwear.
I don't know if you guys have been clothing shopping lately.
Yeah, no, we laugh, we joke, we make jokes about the leftists growing balls and stuff.
But guys, this is a very, very concerning thing because when you dive down this rabbit hole of microplastics, you'll find that It's one of those things that it's like, it's everywhere.
Everywhere, all the products we use on a daily basis.
Our food, our laundry detergent with all the chemicals, our clothing, everywhere.
And when you understand what microplastics actually do to the human body, and like you said earlier in the previous segment... Oh, it's the reason for my budding breasts, right?
And so it's a pretty dark rabbit hole, and one of the things that he got on in the previous segment was talking about underwear and the importance of wearing cotton clothes and all that.
There is actually a study, and I'd be very curious if the crew can find it.
Uh that they conducted on male test subjects where they actually had a control control group that just wore cotton underwear.
And then the other group, they wore a strap around their genitals that was pot like it was polyester.
So they wore that and it was a period of at least 30 or 60 days.
I can't remember.
It was a pretty significant amount of time.
And they periodically tested the sperm counts of the men who were wearing the polyester jockstrap.
And what they found was literally like over the course of time, their sperm count was decreasing, decreasing, decreasing, decreasing until it went to like almost zero.
And you know, I could be wrong on that, but this study Was pretty damning on that, on polyester in particular.
And maybe we could attribute that, the sperm count, to two factors.
If it was an actual jockstrap, and I don't mean to be crude or anything like that, and I'm not joking, but I do know that when the testes are taken closer to the body and they do, they are warmer, right, that also decreases sperm count.
But, but I do see that other variable, which is the poly, right?
And just to add to what you're saying, you know, I mentioned this to you while we were in break, was a study that I had recently read about examining mixed clothing in the washer.
If you've got cotton clothing and you are washing it with a lot of your poly stuff, stuff that has plastics in it, as those fibers break down, as all clothes break down when they are washed with a washing machine, some of those plastics get embedded in your cotton clothing.
So if you do have cottons, you want to wash those separately.
So I think that in the coming years, this is going to enter the public consciousness a lot more as fertility starts to become more and more of a crisis than it already is, especially in the wake of the mass vaccination rollout, as people are really going to start having trouble conceiving.
I actually am very optimistic about this subject reaching the larger public, and I think that we're going to actually see A sort of resurgence and wanting to go back to more natural things, natural clothing, natural remedies overall, actually, not even talking about fertility, but just we're already starting to see hints of that right now.
And especially if you're on X or Twitter, there's there seems to be a very big tone shift happening away from pharmaceuticals, away from the medical establishment, as it were.
And I think it's a beautiful thing.
And I think it's going to make us more fertile, it's going to make us more productive, and it's going to make us just better in every regard.
And this is the issue, is that a lot of people throw the baby out with the bathwater.
They say, well, I didn't like what he says about CE5.
Or he says that he makes money off of this stuff, therefore you can't trust anything he has to say.
Guys, that's not how the world works.
People can present information, it can be true, and you don't have to agree with them as a person.
This is what prevents disclosure from happening, is that everybody draws these battle lines about who their champion is, and they need some pure, pristine person.
Damn it, I forgot the metaphor, but... It'll come to him.
That like, oh, everybody demands ideological purity, right?
When you demand ideological purity in the UFO community, You've doomed yourself to failure.
I don't demand ideological purity from anybody.
And you see this a lot in US politics as well.
Probably on both sides, but, uh, you know, on one side, you may say, well, you can't be a Democrat if you don't believe in trans issues, for example.
And they would say, if you don't believe in trans issues, then you're not a Democrat.
That's ideological purity.
In the UFO community, you could say, well, if you don't believe that aliens are real, then you can't believe in disclosure.
Again, ideological purity.
If you are holding these ideological pure standards, you are the problem.
At the end of the day, we should be able to agree on things that are factual, and we can all have our own opinion of stuff that is our belief system.
Right?
That's how humans are.
Not everybody is the same.
Not everybody is going to hold all the same beliefs all the time.
And if you start discounting people and saying that because somebody did not hold the ideological peer standards that I believe in, that I'm going to cross them out, then you're never going to get disclosure in this life.
And this is exactly what people have done to me, where I've been literally giving them real disclosure of teleportation technology, anti-gravitic technology, or gravity manipulation technology, free energy.
But because they don't like my political opinions, I don't meet the ideological standard for a lot of these UFO weirdo nut jobs in the UFO community.
And therefore they block me and they think that I must be disinformation.
Those are the people that are the problem.
Those are the people that are holding us back.
That's the reason why nothing's ever been accomplished from UFO disclosure.
So all I'm saying right now is that at the end of the day, if you want to accomplish anything, you can't just throw people out and say, this person's disinformation.
I don't like this person or that person.
You have to address each argument they make, each factual and opinion they make on its own merits.
And if we do that, then we might actually accomplish something, guys.
We're talking about ideological purity and what's wrong with America, right?
This is a phenomenon that I felt like I have identified but was unable to articulate until I saw that clip a few weeks ago.
Ashton Forbes is known for his commentary on MH Flight, or Flight MH370, I believe.
The disappearance of that flight or the...
He believes that flight was transported via a portal that was generated by zero point energy and there's a lot there.
But what he was talking about seems to be a pretty universal truth in politics nowadays.
And I feel like, I feel like the problem in the country recently, and I feel like if I ever make this point, right, with people, it tends to resonate with them.
It's that, okay, so we set ideological purity tests for ourselves.
He mentioned in that clip, the sign that people put in their front yards that says, I believe in the science, I believe in the, you know, all the things that these, You know, people believe in, despite the fact that, you know, they don't believe that an aborted baby is actually a separate human from the mother and the father.
Well, science says, right, that that unique DNA means that it is an autonomous light form, right?
Despite the fact that it is dependent on a mother for sustenance and nurturing.
Um, for, for nine months.
Um, it is a unique person, right?
But they don't believe that science.
They believe the science.
And if you don't believe the science, then you're an enemy.
And, and let me take this a little bit further.
I think that one of the big issues that we have in civil discourse nowadays is once we've determined that someone is not ideologically pure, that they violated one of the tenets of our beliefs, We misattribute the motives, right?
We think that the reason why, and I know I'm staying on abortion, I'm actually like, I don't really care too much about abortion, but it is a good way to present these things in case studies and in the form that some people are very passionate about.
And if we were to take that back into account, right, and say, Uh, you know, we, we, we demand this ideological purity from people, right?
Um, you know, if you, if you don't believe what I believe, then I believe that, uh, you, you don't want abortion because you want men in women's bodies, right?
Or some of these other really derivative, really, um, polarizing statements that, you know, are made in these campaign commercials about, you know, Oh yeah, you know, like they just don't want you to have the abortions because they think you're bad.
It's because you're a woman and they're a man and they want to assert authority over you and they want to inject themselves into the decision-making process that you have between you and your doctor, right?
Despite the fact that your doctor is an abortionist and they make money off of abortions and they're trying to actively get you to have an abortion, right?
You know, especially if you go to a place like Planned Parenthood and You know, there's things like that.
There is a financial incentive for it and all this stuff.
But we've started, right, to misattribute the reasons why, right?
Maybe the reason why someone is against abortion, right, is not for that reason.
Maybe it's because they do believe the science, right?
And they do think, oh wow, well that separate entity, right, has unique DNA and therefore maybe it is wrong.
to abort that life without a reason, right?
And that's just, that's, again, one example.
In politics, right, with immigration, right, if we're talking immigration, oh, Donald Trump hates Mexicans because they're brown.
Well, no.
Donald Trump does not hate Mexicans, first off.
Second off, he doesn't hate them because they're brown.
I think that Donald Trump understands that the economy is in a place where it's being exploited with cheap labor, right?
When we look and we delve into the actual substance of Trump's immigration policies, he's not locking it off, right?
People are still able to immigrate here.
It just is a little more difficult, right?
Again, we look at this through the lens of Americans.
In other countries, it is almost impossible in some cases to get citizenship, right?
Even if you're married to someone who is a citizen of that country, it can sometimes be almost impossible to get that citizenship.
Right?
And so we're talking about the erosion of culture, right?
In America, right?
People who were not raised as Americans, who have a different set of moral values coming in here, right?
Into America.
And it's understandable by some people.
You know, are against illegal immigration or mass immigration that is legal.
There are some people who have ideas about how much immigration should be legalized, right?
And to just write people off as racist when you hear that, rather than delving into intellectual conversation, is... it's not right.
And it's the reason why we're at each other's throats nowadays, because we don't have the patience to hear other people out and to listen and to try to wade through nuance, right?
And so when I saw that clip that Ashton Forbes had on ideological purity, I just, you know, I had to play it.
I had to bring that.
He really did crystallize that thought very well.
I just think that if you guys take that in your pockets, right?
It's easy for us at in fours, right?
We take calls all the time.
We're about to go out your calls.
Don't worry.
We got 12 more minutes in this segment.
Don't you worry.
We're getting all your calls, but.
You know, we frequently hear from people who have different opinions than us, right?
And it's not to say we don't love you, right?
To disagree is not to... To disagree is not to dislike, right?
It's just to say, and you know what?
We agree on a majority of the issues, but maybe there only was one shooter.
Maybe there was, you know what I mean?
Maybe Kamala, you know, isn't the best candidate.
Maybe, you know, this, that, the other thing, right?
Yeah and I'll say this and then we'll go on to calls here in a second but I think that when you see a clip like that and you would think that it would be very easy to say that in this country that there is an overall death of nuance and discourse.
Like there's no, you know, okay I like this bit of what he or she said and I'll take that, I'll leave that out.
It appears like there's just a total loss of nuance but I think... How much of that do you attribute to the 280 character phenomenon?
Oh, like you mean like on X and stuff like being able to only bite-sized chunks?
There's a lot to that and that's like that's a whole nother rabbit hole right there when you talk about the attention economy and how information gets out there.
But the main point that I wanted to just kind of leave off here was the idea that I think there are certain hills that it's okay to die on, and then there's some hills, as it were, that it's okay to have nuance on.
What I mean by that is, the question that we should all be asking when we're talking to someone that we disagree with is, do we share the same goals?
Do we share the same goals?
So if you take gun control, the question of gun control, for instance.
You know, my personal opinion is that, you know, the Second Amendment is absolute, it shouldn't be infringed, and all of that.
We should all have free access to guns, and guns are a major deterrent, yada yada.
And if I'm talking to a leftist...
If so long as we want, you know, for instance, children to be safe in schools, you know, because the shooting stuff is a big aspect of gun control, especially from the Democrats.
If I want kids to be safe and they want kids to be safe, we share that same goal, but we just have different ways of going about it.
say arm veterans and have them be, you know, public school security all across the country.
And they say, you know, maybe we should, you know, we should have a bit more nuance to it, maybe make gun free zones.
Okay, if we as long as we want kids to be safe, I can have a conversation with you.
But if you want to eviscerate our constitutional amendment and take it away and go, no, no, guns are inherently evil.
They're not just a tool.
And I want no one to have guns, then okay, Well.
We're not even working in the same We're not on the same page whatsoever.
We don't have the same goals at all so well That's the important distinction.
I think should be made sure sure and maybe they are coming at it from good intentions though Maybe their intention is to keep the kids safe right however They're unaware, right?
They're unwilling to work with you, right?
On the fact that guns save more lives than they take, right?
And we can actually say this from a very confident standpoint in the sense that guns are used to stop people with bad intentions, right?
How many people with bad intentions would have killed another before being put down?
Right?
And I know it sounds very calloused to put it like that, but I mean, that is a real truth.
We don't live in a perfect world.
And unfortunately, a lot of the, it is rhetoric in and of itself, right?
Comes from an ideologically, an ideological standpoint, right?
The ideological part of it, meaning in a perfect world, right?
Ideally, ideally in a perfect world, right?
We wouldn't need guns, right?
In a perfect world, right?
We wouldn't need money, right?
Because food grows on trees in some parts of the world.
But that's neither here nor there.
And what I'm ultimately getting at is that, you know, in this country, we need to first identify, hey, the person I'm talking to, what do we think the amount of information that they're getting is coming from sources that may be like or different from me.
And then it's to take a step back and not blame those people, right?
Because those people, it's not like they really, honestly, a lot of the times, a lot of the things that they repeat, and I've been guilty of this myself, right, is not an original thought.
It's something that they picked up on in the media.
It resonated with them.
They said, hey, that that rings true to me.
And in conversation at the water cooler, they bust that back out.
You know, and we do that for a variety of reasons, right?
We live fast paced lives.
And a lot of the times we're willing to delegate the critical thinking to others.
And, you know, when we stop doing that, when we start really looking at what we're talking about, you know.
I think society heals from there, but it does take patience and it does take a bigger person.
And I mean, it is seriously like when you talk about going for a fruit that is not low-hanging, right?
It's not about owning the libs, right?
As fun as it is to watch occasionally, right, on the internet, like Rekt, oh my gosh, R-E-K-T.
You know, at the end of the day, we can take a look and say, oh, you know, perhaps it's not healthy.
It's entertaining, but it's not healthy, right?
Because you think about what it's like to be on the other end of watching that video.
Someone who held the same beliefs as the person getting wrecked.
They probably, you know, when they see that, they see the person, you know, getting shamed Shamed, we take that from Ben Shapiro, in front of a bunch of people and they react negatively because they've internalized that belief and then they've got cognitive dissonance and then they try to find the exception to the rule that is being discussed.
We all tend to do that, which is why we typically, you know, We typically try to speak specifically and not in generalities, but either way, we're going back out to your calls.
We have bored you enough.
Baker from Slackerfornia.
Baker is on hold and has been on hold for a long time.
So, Baker, we're giving you a second to make it to your cell phone.
Thank you so much for staying on hold with us.
What do you have to say to America?
unidentified
Yeah, I've just been making breakfast while listening to you guys.
You guys are great.
Sweet.
Listen, dude, we can't let these things, these conspiracies, we can't let them get ahead of us and run away with it, which they're already doing with the whole shooter and everything.
Like, sure, we can discuss water towers and shooters and all this, but we need to be focusing on the fact that it was just a stand down and they wanted Trump dead.
Right, even with Kennedy, like... Right, and like, you know, we can talk about, like, all of this stuff will come out later, but no one focused, like, on the Kennedy assassination, no one really focused on, it's like, the incentive, you know, how they would do it, The results that they got from it, right?
We went into NOM right after.
I mean, there's a lot of reasons they killed Kennedy and all that.
But they're already running away with the narrative.
As soon as you start talking about second shooters and tree lines and water towers, then they can just write it off as, oh, you're all nutjobs, conspiracy theorists.
And we're losing.
We need to go to the black gates.
We have Mordor on the run.
And we need to meet them at the Black Gate and make a final stand right now.
It's really interesting too, one of the things you just said, when they call people conspiracy theorists for asking some of the most basic questions, right?
You think about it, it's like the question that you asked about multiple shooters is a legitimate question that everyone working security was trying to answer the day of the assassination and are probably still trying to answer.
People who are very serious people, right?
Who are trying to answer that question.
Yet, if you were to ask that question as, you know, Joe Baker from Slacker-fornia, right?
You're a conspiracy theorist, right?
For asking a serious question that a serious person would be asking, right?
Has every right to know.
But it's contradictory to a narrative that is put out, right?
It's uh, right.
It is pretty stark.
And, and you know, the video that we had played yesterday of security detail on the roof, doing an after action hot wash, if you will, of, of what had gone down, right?
There's a guy who explicitly states, Hey, we had a member of security who had eyes on this guy, was able to take a picture and then Relay that picture up the chain of command before, you know, and there are other reports of another sniper who said that he was locked on to Crooks before he had, you know, opened fire, right?
And hadn't received a termination, right?
unidentified
And that should be the focus that we're drilling on is that this wasn't a security failure.
This was a, hey, This guy's gonna shoot Trump, let's let it happen, let's leave this perfect sniper spot.
I mean, dude, the irony of them talking about a sloped roof is number one, it's really not that sloped, and number two, the way that it's sloped, it's actually the perfect sniper spot because it conceals part of your body a little bit.
The funnier thing is that, I don't know if you saw this, but yesterday we again had Had a congressman or an aide to a congressman who was questioning Cheadle.
And in that line of questioning they said, did you know that the pitch of the roof that the countersniper who shot Crooks had a more sloped grade to it than the roof that Crooks was on?
So that totally blows out the line.
The disinformation that was put out by the government about why there was a lapse in security there.
Because it wasn't a sanitary, or what did she use?
A sanitized roof position is what she's talking about.
She's talking about it needing to be super level.
I mean, that is just a bunch of crap.
And yeah, no, I think it is legitimate.
Otherwise, if criticism of this was not legitimate, she would still have her job.
And so, um, uh, another, another, uh, just to add to what you're talking about, Baker, um, another article that I don't have in front of me, um, and I'm, I'm putting the crew on the spot here.
I believe Christopher Wray, um, said that there were multiple people in the FBI or in government who, uh, expressed, uh, uh, discontent with the fact that Trump was not actually shot in center mass or was not wounded, was not killed on that day.
And that's pretty scary, right?
You know, it's good that, you know, people in the FBI are at least honest about their biases, but, um, you know, oh boy.
I mean, we've just been in a totally different situation had Trump, if Trump was dead today, I don't even know if we'd be broadcasting, right?
The American Journal is watching you with your hosts, Matt Marrero and Reese Weber. - I didn't know if there's anything that could top the synth in this song, and the liner I think just did it.
That's that's what you peaked my interest a lot of crazy stuff's going on in the neck of your woods Yeah Man I don't know.
I don't know a lot of crazy stuff going on in DC, man.
That's what I was calling about Okay, I was really just wondering how the Democrats are Just wondering how how are the Democrats going?
What are the Democrats gonna say in line at the gate?
The real capital riots that have been taking place the last two days, but especially yesterday, what we saw with all the graffiti and everything like that.
It's been endlessly fascinating for me to witness how we're seeing these different identity groups within leftist politics kind of eat each other alive in the past year, especially in the wake of October 7th, the attack that occurred on Israel then.
It's just, I think this kind of thing was inevitable, where it was like these factions start to turn on each other.
And now you have a bunch of leftists being called anti-Semites.
And that is the defining feature of leftist politics.
They split people into their only worthy So far as the sum total of like their identity groups, right?
Which fractured identity group are you?
And how much brownie points does that get you for being oppressed?
And again, that's just a symptom of seeing the world through a lens of power.
And we are now starting to see this acceleration take place where we see that ideology kind of Reach its natural conclusion, which is, you know, it eventually turns on factions just eating each other alive because inevitably one group is going to feel more disenfranchised and worthy of the throne than the other.
And I just I see these protests like we were talking about the stop Palestine, you know, free Palestine and all that.
And, you know, it's just a mess.
I kind of at this point, I don't know about you, Matt, but like I've kind of just decided to just.
Opt out.
I'm like, I'm out.
I, you know, I don't want genocide for anybody, any group of people.
I think there's merits a little bit on both sides.
And this isn't me just sitting on the fence or opting out.
It's just that I see so much tomfoolery and confusion and chaos and deception on both sides of the aisle of this whole, like, of course, of the Hamas and Israel debate that I just, you have to have to certain point, just go like, I'm out.
And when we talked about with the other caller, you know, conspiracy theorists, when talking about the Trump assassination and whatnot, it's we keep seeing the same playbook from the left where it's just they'll use these trigger phrases like conspiracy theorists.
And then also anti-Semite as a smokescreen to shut down conversation.
They don't want to hear you go that far, right, to where you pass the ideological test of the people that they have under their sphere of influence, their influence, if you will.
Well, if you think about it, I mean, there's, we clown on Star Wars a lot, especially the recent releases for being cheesy and just kind of just, just full of soy.
If there are red flags that go off in your mind when you're talking to other people, right?
The absolution, right, should be one of them, but also speaking in terms of superlatives.
Always, never.
Yeah.
And there are exceptions to those rules, and that's why we typically abstain from using those.
And typically, you know, when we look at Harrison's coverage on the show or even Chase's, right, we tend to try to give specific examples rather than saying, oh, all of these people are like this or all of those people.
We have interesting news to bring to your attention, and it's not too often that we have to shift the focus internally, but Reese has something for us.
So what we have here on the left of the image on the far left for radio listeners, what you're looking at is a image taken from Bohemian Grove.
Everybody is cloaked in an ominous, sinister red light.
Men in creepy white robes are carrying what looks to be candles or torches of some sort in a in an ominous, ominous, creepy procession as they are known to do.
I mean, I know it takes like 20 or 30 seconds for the baby's blood to get into your bloodstream, like the adrenochrome, but if your bloodstream is already the adrenochrome, then maybe you are the adrenochrome.
The RICO case angle is missing out on the unspoken conspiracy aspect.
Jamie, take it away.
unidentified
Yes, sir.
That's what I was calling about.
I've been listening to it all week since the assassination attempt.
All these people, these senators, congressmen, anchormen, anchorwomen, everyone who has talked about getting rid of Trump, who has threatened him, I can get down with that.
pictures of them with severed heads, things like that, they should all be prosecuted for an unspoken conspiracy to kill the ex-president of the United States.
And, you know, I wish, I really do wish that kind of logic would actually appeal to, you know, them, not only them, but the average Democratic voter.
But, you know, we live in the era of 1984 where it's like the party's most essential command is to deny the evidence before your eyes and ears.
And, you know, I totally, totally agree with you, but I don't think they could even intellectually engage in that.
Kind of argumentation.
They would find some way to flip the script back on us and, you know, have the full force of the media establishment back up their illogical counter argument.
And, you know, the people like you, me, Matt, everybody here, everybody in our audience would totally go like, yeah, you're being not being logically consistent here.
But, you know, so many people are still asleep, unfortunately, and so many people just can't Take in illogic when they see it, slapping them in the face, and, you know, it's just a sad state of affairs in this country right now, unfortunately.
Discover the newest line of supplements from InfoWars designed to boost vitality and enhance overall well-being available exclusively at InfoWarsStore.com.
Whether you're looking to support immune health, improve cognitive function, or increase energy levels, our meticulously crafted formulas cater to diverse needs.
We have ageless vitality collagen, Superfood greens, mushroom max, turmeric 95, better mood plus, libido rx, cbd, full spectrum 10 and 25 milligram gummies, as well as so much more.
The premium InfoWars lifeline.
It's InfoWars MD.
And it's available now at 25% off at Infowarsstore.com.
I suggest the collagen and just search it yourself.