July 23, 2024 - American Journal - Breanna Morello
02:24:42
The American Journal: Eric Holder Now In Control Of White House As Deep State Consolidates Coup Over Executive Branch Before Moving Against Trump — Secret Service Director Cheatle Resigns! - FULL SHOW - 07.23.24
Chase Geiser and Alex Jones allege a July 23, 2024 "soft coup"—Biden’s withdrawal after poor debate performance (June 27), suspicious AI-like rally calls, and $231M ActBlue donations for Harris—while framing her rise as elite-driven identity politics. Secret Service Director Kim Cheadle’s resignation over Trump’s shooting exposes alleged stand-down orders, drone breaches, and missing records, fueling claims of Deep State complicity. Callers link the attack to JFK parallels, DHS drills, and globalist control, warning Harris’s presidency risks undemocratic power grabs. The episode ties these events to a broader "woke mind virus" and New World Order conspiracy, urging financial support via InfoWarsMD supplements to "fight back." [Automatically generated summary]
As Politico reported, Vice President Kamala Harris's aides are in a panic, stating that she is effing up and perhaps shouldn't be the heir apparent for 2024's presidential race because she could not defeat whomever the Republican Party puts up.
So don't tell me I got to support Kamala Harris because she Black.
The race pander from the Democratic Party got to stop.
It's really that simple.
Thank you for listening.
As a Black woman living in the United States, I am telling you, do not vote for Kamala Harris just because she is black and just because she is a woman.
Especially if you are a Christian watching this and if you have the voting ability, vote for the person that God wants in office.
Now, I'm not gonna say whether that is Kamala or Trump or whoever.
But what I do know is that one side is very clearly pushing for godly principles to be established and one side is pushing against those principles.
But you're also Indian American and I'm just curious... Indeed!
If Harris can barely handle the mainly ceremonial office of the vice presidency, imagine the hell on earth we can expect if Biden's passing gives her the dictatorial power that she craves.
Welcome to the American Journal, ladies and gentlemen.
I am Chase Geiser, your host this morning.
Harrison Smith is out of the office this week on a much-needed, deserved vacation.
He will be back very soon.
I'll be filling in today and tomorrow.
Special guest hosts on Thursday and Friday as well.
And oh, what a time it is to be alive!
All day yesterday, rumors were floating around the internet, flying around at light speed, frankly.
Is Joe Biden dead?
Was Joe Biden dead?
Is he dying?
There was one account in Global News which tweeted that he, it had received reports that Joe Biden was in hospice and only had the night to live.
Saying, if this isn't true, we will delete our account because we believe the source.
And it turned out not to be true and Global News actually deleted their account.
30,000 followers.
So they honored it.
Obviously, it was just a mistake if they were willing to bet their entire account on it.
But the fact that we've arrived at a place where people have reason to believe that the president is dead or has been dead for several days or is dying is truly remarkable.
The fact of the matter is, Joe Biden has been dead for many years.
He's more machine than man now, similar to Darth Vader, only much less competent than Darth Vader.
But I predicted yesterday, I think Joe Biden's going to be dead within a few weeks, certainly before the election.
Natural causes, poison, what have you.
I don't want any harm to come to him.
I want him to be prosecuted, not persecuted.
But We came off of this weekend experiencing a soft coup.
And all we heard from Joe Biden yesterday was a call in to a campaign rally on behalf of Kamala Harris, where he sounded like a combination of a few things.
He sounded like a combination of AI, which I'm not sure if they used AI or not, but there were some, there were some details that made it sound like maybe.
And a stroke.
And that it was pre-recorded.
So they make this call-in sound as if it's a live call-in.
But it's pretty obviously pre-recorded.
And even Kamala Harris almost accidentally referred to it as a recording and a slip-up in her response.
Instead of a live broadcast.
Reports are that he's on tons of pain meds for something.
I don't know what.
I don't know if he had a fall.
I don't know if he had a stroke.
I don't know if they took away the medicine that was keeping him alive and he's just slowly dying in this.
Kind of pulled the plug way.
But the man's on his way out.
And this resignation or withdrawal rather is a better term because he hasn't resigned the presidency yet this withdrawal that we heard about on Sunday really did seem like a soft coup now there's a lot of variables to consider however the soft coup is exciting and there's evidence for it but keep in mind folks that Donald Trump
Almost a month ago, immediately after the debate performance on June 27th, said that Joe Biden had made the decision to withdraw from the race.
And said that it was going to be Kamala.
And that's what happened.
That's exactly what ended up happening.
And so we've been reporting on this for the last month or so and covering this.
Everybody's been talking about it.
It seems like there was a civil war and a schism between the Democratic Party and The Biden regime, the Biden campaign, but it's very possible that Joe Biden did actually make this decision to withdraw from the race immediately after this disastrous debate performance and that Hunter and Jill came in to oversee the transition.
I know there's been reports that she's been snapping and losing her temper and wanting to keep him in.
He called in very angrily, said he was going to stay in the race.
They called all the governors, said that they were going to stay in the race.
They insisted they were going to stay in the race.
But that's kind of the thing that you do when you don't want to shock, fear, or inspire fear in the hearts of the American people.
And you want to ensure that campaign funding and donations continue to come in, right?
I mean, if he knew that Kamala Harris was going to be the candidate, that he was going to endorse Kamala Harris, that they were setting up Kamala for success after his withdrawal from this race, and that he would be able to transfer the funds from their ticket to her new ticket legally, then doesn't it make sense that you would act like everything and that he would be able to transfer the funds from their ticket to her new ticket Yeah.
If I had to guess ultimately what happened, my guess in retrospect is that Joe Biden had this disastrous performance, made the decision within a week or so That he was going to see how things went.
Maybe I'll resign.
Maybe I won't.
His family pushed him to stay in, namely Hunter and Jill, because Jill loves living in the White House and Hunter obviously needs his dad to be president if he expects to be pardoned, although I'm sure that will happen before the end of his presidency.
And they continue to just test whether or not this was going to work.
They did some polling.
They got some new data.
They listened to their advisors and eventually, I think, just made the decision that it was going to be impossible for Joe Biden to be victorious.
Yesterday we saw that Google search results for is Biden dead surged past the term donate to Kamala, which is absolutely fascinating.
Google search requests for is Biden dead have surged past donate to Kamala amid growing speculation over Joe Biden's whereabouts since he dropped out of the 2024 presidential race on Sunday.
And the issue It's almost irrelevant whether or not he's dead.
For one reason.
If the American people don't know whether or not the President of the United States is dead, then he might as well be.
And that's not a call to violence.
I mean, practically speaking, he might as well be dead if no one sees him, if no one hears from him.
If when they hear from him, they can't tell Whether or not it's really him, he doesn't show his face at all, something is terribly wrong.
And I know for the duration of Biden's presidency, something has always been terribly wrong, namely the fact that we had somebody struggling with dementia as the President of the United States.
But if the entire population, if the entire civilization of all of our citizens are wondering whether or not this guy is even alive, there is no way in hell that his doctor was telling the truth when he released a report yesterday that Joe Biden is in good health and performing his presidential duties.
And so I think the deal that was cut before this weekend was that Joe Biden would agree to withdraw as long as the Democratic machine fought like hell for him to remain the president until the inauguration in January.
Because I think that was the main concern.
If he would have withdrawn from the race immediately after that debate performance when the entire Mediascape narrative was Centered around his cognitive decline, which was on stage on June 27th.
The entire conversation was that he'd lost his mind.
He was no longer functioning.
He wasn't sharp.
Obviously, something was wrong with Joe.
Obviously, he's sick.
He even tweeted that he was sick.
Then he would have had to resign the presidency at the same time, so they had to wait and create a buffer period between that dismal, disastrous performance on the debate stage and his withdrawal.
Otherwise, a resignation would be forced using.
The Constitution to remove an incapable president from the office of the presidency.
And so I think the deal that has been worked out over the course of the last 30 days or so.
Really, two to three weeks has been OK.
I'll withdraw from this race.
You'll get your candidate.
We'll save the party.
We'll save the country, as they think.
Even though they're lying when they even say that they think that.
They just want to control the country.
That's what they mean by save it.
Save it for ourselves.
As long as this democratic machine, all the leaders, all the donors, all the media outlets, promise that they will fight brutally hard against my Resignation or pushes for my resignation or motions to remove me from office before January, but I still think that he's on his last legs literally.
And I think that he is.
Not going to be the president of the United States.
Through November 5th of this year, I think we are going to see a president Kamala Harris before November 5th.
I think it's possible that she doesn't even win in the convention next month.
I'm not sure how it legally works with the delegates that she's been assigned.
We'll see what happens.
But when you have Barack Obama coming out in his statements and talking about a fair and open convention process, it seems to me that some of the major political players are seeing a path Different than a path toward Kamala.
Now, Nancy Pelosi, other major ones have come out and endorsed Kamala.
She's got the momentum as somebody who was on this ticket, but she's not an incumbent because she's not the sitting president of the United States.
She might become an incumbent before next month, but it's not enough momentum for her to carry through and win.
And she was among the least popular candidates in the primary in the 2020 election cycle.
Now we know that basically everyone who voted for Joe Biden, if they weren't dead or fake ballots, really didn't vote for Joe Biden so much as they voted against Donald Trump.
So maybe it doesn't matter who the Democratic candidate is.
Maybe it doesn't matter at all who they run against Trump because none of their base is actually voting for any of their candidates.
Instead, their base is actually Voting against Donald Trump, voting against patriotism, voting against populism, voting against America first as they fight desperately for globalism.
But I want to show you this clip of the crews ready of Joe Biden calling in for a couple of minutes yesterday.
Julie, if I didn't have COVID, I'd be sitting there with you, standing there with you.
I'm so proud of what you've all done.
And COVID hasn't been keeping me out of people's hair for the next three or four days, but I'm going to be on the road, and I'm not going anywhere.
I know yesterday's news is surprising, and it's hard for you to hear, but it was the right thing to do.
I'm hoping you'll give every bit of your heart and soul that you gave to me I want you to know, I won't be on the ticket, but I'm still going to be fully, fully engaged.
I've got six months left in my presidency.
I'm determined to get as much done as I possibly can, both foreign policy and domestic policy.
I'll be doing whatever Kamala wants me or needs me to do in addition.
And all of the pieces are falling into place right now before our eyes for them to try to steal this election.
But I don't think it's going to be enough.
I think it's going to be too big to rig.
I hope so anyway.
It's going to be hell if Donald Trump doesn't win this election for so many reasons on so many different levels in so many different ways.
But we see that despite the fact that Microsoft is ditching its business critical DEI team as the woke wave begins to unravel.
This has happened to Tractor Supply thanks to the heroic work of Robbie Starbuck and other companies that he's called out for this as well.
you These companies are firing their DEI departments because they cost money, they bring zero value, they only bring trouble and alienate Employees and customers.
That's that's all you really need to see to know that diversity, equity and inclusion is just trash is what happened.
And you can almost see it over the decades.
Where you go back and you watch the first Star Wars from what was a 77 is a new hope.
Great Empire Strikes Back, great.
The return of the Jedi is good.
I wouldn't say great.
They obviously wanted to sell a lot of toys and so they had the Ewoks involved and it was kind of silly but it was still pretty darn good.
Then you have George Lucas bring the whole series back in the early 2000s and it's okay.
The script's better than the production.
They made some bizarre decisions.
But then Disney buys it and they systematically proceed to totally ruin it because of the ideology behind the writing.
So instead of this being a story of the hero's journey and a young man reaching self-actualization and despite the fact that genetically he was lined up to be perhaps one of the most evil people in the world because his father was Darth Vader of all people, the most famous villains in the history of cinema.
He chose and insisted to be good.
The message being, you are the captain of your fate.
You are the master of your soul.
You can choose to be good despite where you come from.
And yes, you might have characteristics and talents that are genetically given to you that are genetically part of your fate and your destiny, but your character and your soul are inherently pure.
And as long as you don't allow them to be corrupted, you can overcome a galactic empire despite all odds, even your own genetic disposition.
I mean, it was a story about the hero's journey, Against all odds.
And then it became, with these new reboots under Disney, a story about, hey, a girl can learn how to be a better Jedi in two weeks than the trained evil villain.
And even the villain changed to this feminine version where he's wearing the mask for no reason and it's ridiculous and he's like emo and he's whiny and he's weak and he's tearful all the time and he's just kind of a brat who kills his own father.
Compared to Darth Vader, who is so much more of a meaningful villain because he chose to go to the dark side with good intentions, tears, He chose to go to the dark side because he wanted to bring his dead wife back to life and he wanted to bring his dead mother back to life and he thought that the dark side had the power to cure death.
And that says something about the nature of evil.
That says something about what we're supposed to be careful and guard against.
This notion of Machiavellianism.
Is it okay?
Does the end justify the means?
Is it okay to do the wrong thing for the right reasons?
Is it okay to turn to the dark side?
To sell out a little bit here and there?
To compromise our character a little bit here and there?
To work with and align with evil people here and there?
If we have good intentions in the end, that's what it means.
That's what's so powerful about this story.
And there's a case to be made for was Darth Vader actually right?
Obviously terrible villain obviously wasn't right if you really study it.
But it's a much more compelling case than just a stupid boy who's mad that his dad wasn't home long enough.
Whining and crying and wearing a fake mask all while Some woman just decides that she wants to be strong in the force and knows how to use a lightsaber within two weeks.
I mean, it was just DEI, diversity, equity, inclusion, crap.
And then it's propagated to this point now where they're complaining, we don't care if the audience even likes the show, The Acolyte.
Where literally in the trailer, they just do a collectivist, and I don't know if Dan has the clip, sorry Dan to throw a curveball at you, they just do a collectivist rant in The Acolyte.
I can't remember what the words were, but this is like, we, we, we, instead of I, I, I, it's collectivism versus individualism.
I mean, they got so much money because of the theme parks.
They've got so much great legacy content that Disney's going to be okay.
They don't actually even need to make any new content in order to survive.
And I don't mean to go on this huge just rant about Star Wars and DEI as a distraction, but it's so...
Relevant because it propagates across our entire culture and civilization in a way that could ultimately lead to the death of the United States of America.
These are just the symptoms of an underlying Marxist philosophy.
And so Microsoft's removing its DEI team, among others, but we still see big tech is bought and paid for when Democrats are pushing Google to promote authoritative sources, collaborate with government on AI overviews for election and health topics.
Setting the stage for election interference.
We talk all day about Russian interference in our elections, Russian collusion, misinformation, disinformation, how freedom of speech is a threat to democracy, how democracy is a threat to democracy.
Frankly, when they have a candidate running for office who was not elected by any Democratic voter in a primary, likely to be the nominee, Congressman Adam Schiff Do I also challenge to a lawful duel under Texas Penal Code 22.06 if California has intensified its scrutiny of Google's management of AI technologies, particularly its AI overview, which summarizes top web pages, but has been prone to errors raising concerns about its tendency to spread misinformation?
Let me tell you something, folks.
Do you think Adam Schiff or any of these leftists care at all about misinformation?
Do you think that they're in the halls of Congress or the Senate just for the sake of ensuring that people are well informed and there's a transparent government, a transparent process in our legislation, in our leadership, in our wars, in our genocides?
I mean, frankly, Adam Schiff is probably one of the most evil people in the history of our leadership.
What with his involvement on the January 6th committee and his incessant lies after lies.
But it's not just because he's a leftist.
We have had terrible leaders on the right as well, from the Mitch McConnells to the Dan Crenshaws and others.
So I'm no friend of our leaders on the right either.
I don't believe that much of the political establishment, much of the political class believes in truth or transparency at all.
And so whenever I hear them talk about misinformation and concerns about big tech and freedom of speech.
What they're really saying is we're concerned that we are unable to censor the public, that we are unable to totally control the narrative, that we are unable to manipulate what people think, that we are unable to conduct a waterproof, airtight that we are unable to conduct a waterproof, airtight psychological operation on the American people to ensure and guarantee the political outcome we have desired for
I mean, these people have their goals written down, they know what they want, they know what they need, and they're just trying to figure out how to plug up any of the vulnerabilities in their plan to totally subjugate humanity and conglomerate all political power.
Folks, we'll get into more news on the other side.
Make sure in the meantime that you visit InfoWarsStore.com.
It's now more important than ever that you keep us on the air by getting things like organic ashwagandha with black pepper or Joint Relief Max.
Any of the InfoWars MD line.
Amazing products, not an expense.
They are an investment in your health.
We need freedom of speech.
We need this broadcast, not just for the sake of InfoWars, but for the sake of our country.
For the sake of humanity, it's self-codedinfowarstore.com right now.
How did a 20-year-old loner with a week's notice pick the absolute best location to assassinate President Trump when the entire Secret Service missed it?
Director Cheadle, in your leadership, your agency got outsmarted and outmaneuvered by a 20-year-old.
How can we have any confidence that you could stop a trained professional from a nefarious nation-state?
Those are absolutely questions that we need to have answers to.
I know they're questions, but the fact of the matter is we can't have that confidence.
Director, do you have the ability personally, do you have the authority to beef up security of any of your protectees?
Yes, I do.
So were you also aware there was a credible threat President Trump was facing?
He was facing a heightened security threat to a foreign adversary?
Yes.
So given that there was an increased threat to President Trump's life, was he provided a full security complement akin to what a sitting U.S.
president would receive?
He was provided a full complement of security based on the threat assessment that we had.
That's not my question.
And the venue.
My question is, if he'd been the sitting president, would he have had the same security he had on July 13th or would have been beefed up?
There is a difference between the sitting president... So he didn't.
So your answer is he didn't.
And continuity of government and the responsibility that we have.
So he did not.
Okay, there wasn't a CAT team, a full CAT team on site.
There wasn't counter-surveillance teams on site.
But this is the thing.
You just said you had the ability to beef up the security, you knew about the threat, and you didn't.
And that's as telling as it is chilling.
We have satellite images from the Butler Fairgrounds.
Have you visited the site?
No, I have not.
Nine days and you have not visited the site.
You should have been there that night.
Did you talk to, that evening, did you talk to the team, the heroes that surrounded the president?
Did you call them that night?
They were still operational working.
So that's an answer no.
Did you call them the next day?
Yes, I spoke with them.
You called them the very next day, not the day of.
Or was it 72 hours after?
I don't know the timeline, but I spoke with them immediately following.
Okay, because you're under oath.
I think it was 72 hours after.
You waited three days.
What is immediately clear is that there are a number of structures that need to be secured.
Of these, Director, other than the first, you know, immediate four, what's the most dangerous site that should have been secured?
Because you know, Security 101, you've got to mitigate the high ground.
Yes.
Okay.
Do you know what the next most dangerous site—what was the closest structure to the president, other than the four immediate ones that you had your counter-sniper teams on?
There are a number of structures around that event site.
You know who the shooter knew?
The shooter has visited the site two more times than you have, and he had a drone, and he picked the AGR building.
So you said—do you remember in an ABC interview you did that you didn't have people on the roof of the AGR building because you were worried about safety because of the slope?
I recall that statement.
Does the Secret Service have written policy you can share with us about slope roofs?
No.
So why did you act like there was one?
Because isn't your practice to comment on enormous events of enormous national implications when you're ignorant of the facts?
That's rhetorical.
So here's the thing with the slopes.
You go all the way up to like 18-12, you can get to a 1-12, which is about as flat as you can get without it being completely flat.
And you're saying that there was a danger, a safety concern there.
But the problem is, Director, you put your counter snipers on a 3-12 roof, which is steeper than the 1-12.
And by the way, the 1-12 is ADA compliant.
You can build a ramp for a wheelchair on a 1-12 roof.
So these are nothing but pathetic excuses, and they make no sense, and they're a bunch of cow dung.
All the law enforcement I've spoken with over the last nine days are amazed that the AGR rooftop was not secure.
And you want to know why?
Because it's dangerous.
I have never had any long gun training in my life.
I own an AR-15, and last time I shot it, I shot it one time my whole life.
It was six years ago.
That is until Saturday, where we recreated the events in Savoy, Texas.
We recreated what happened in Butler.
I was lying prone on a sloped roof at 130 yards at 630 at night.
And I knew that he had a scope.
I didn't know what kind, red dot, or magnified.
So I shot eight rounds from both.
You know what the result was?
15 out of 16 kill shots!
And the one I missed would have hit the president's ear.
That's a 94% success rate.
And that shooter was a better shot than me.
It is a miracle President Trump wasn't killed.
Corey, compare Torey's life is over because that damn shooter made it on the roof.
And it wasn't the roof that was dangerous.
It was a nut job on top of the roof.
You know what else is dangerous?
I believe your horrifying ineptitude and your lack of skilled leadership is a disgrace.
Your obfuscating today is shameful.
And you should be fired immediately and go back to garden Doritos.
And there's other video in the context of her testimony yesterday, which makes this even more alarming than you could possibly imagine.
Breaking 9-11 posted this new video shows Secret Service perch at Trump's Butler Rally had full view of the roof where the shooter carried out the assassination attempt.
It looks like they might have even had this same line of sight.
But check this out.
This is clip 23.
And then after that, we'll go right into clip 15.
Right there.
Right there.
Look at that.
Oh, so he was sitting right there on the roof and they had this beautiful window view and they must just not have been looking out the window.
They must just not been paying attention that day.
Absolutely unbelievable the degree level of incompetence displayed here and incompetence is even the right word.
This is just malice.
This is complacence.
Or complicity?
They were just complicit in the assassination attempt of the president.
This is clip number 15 here.
Representative Eli Crane on the roof where the shooter fired at Trump.
unidentified
Alright guys, I'm up here on the building where the supposed sniper took his shot.
It's not that steep at all.
Just had a 70-year-old man back here climb up on the roof easily.
See that water tower behind me had Secret Service or anybody had sniper teams up there.
This guy wouldn't have made it five feet up this roof.
He would have been taken out behind me.
We see The windows that Secret Service was supposedly in the second floor.
So we're going to dive more into clips in the next segment and over the course of the next hour or so.
From the congressional hearing yesterday, it was hours upon hours long.
We watched the whole thing.
We found all the best clips.
There were historic moments.
But just an astounding display of covering up defensiveness, misinformation, disinformation, misleading from Cheadle there.
I knew she was bad, but I didn't know she was evil until I saw this yesterday.
I knew she was incompetent, but I didn't know she was complicit until I saw this yesterday.
This is going to go down in history as one of the most terrible acts of Betrayal, I think, of the American people.
And what boggles my mind the most about this is why is it that you would have a situation in our political climate, dynamic system, however you want to phrase it, where a person's political opponent is ultimately responsible for determining the security of that person.
I mean, keep in mind, we've got Joe Biden, then Mayorkas, Mayorkas, then Cheadle, Cheadle, then Donald Trump, protecting Donald Trump.
It's all of the world's supervillains responsible for protecting the person that everybody on their side wants dead.
Something is incredibly screwed up.
I think if you're a former president of the United States, especially, you should have unilateral legislative control over who your own security is.
There should be a guaranteed minimum budget amount relative to other leaders, or it should just be matched to what the president is.
It's remarkable to me that this happened.
It wasn't just incompetence.
It was an inside job, folks.
The only thing they really messed up was that they missed their shot.
More on the other side.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host.
This morning and tomorrow morning, Harrison Smith will be back in the studio next week.
I want to go straight to clip number 10 here.
We're going to cover this hearing yesterday with Secret Service SS Director Cheadle, where she says that she knows how many shell casings were on the shooter's roof, but she refuses to tell the committee.
This is clip number 10.
unidentified
You keep referring to the FBI.
When asked how many shell casings were on the roof, you referred to the FBI.
When asked if there were explosives in the car, you referred to the FBI.
When asked if Crooks was acting alone, you referred to the FBI.
See a common theme here?
I can go on and on.
My question is, who at the FBI should I speak with?
Wait for it.
Wait for it.
The FBI is responsible for the criminal investigation.
Is there a name?
I'm not certain.
I'm not certain.
Alright, here we go.
Not certain.
I don't know.
Let me ask a different question.
Have you been in communication with the FBI?
Yes, I have.
With whom?
I speak with the Director and the Deputy Director.
Okay.
And what have they shared with you about this investigation?
So I'll give you an opportunity to answer again.
Did they share with you how many shell casings were on the roof?
They have shared with me... Did they share with you how many shell casing were on the roof?
Yes.
Okay, how many were there?
I would refer to the FBI.
How many were there?
And their information that they need to share in their investigation.
So they've shared the information with you.
You just don't want to share the information with us.
Correct?
We have concurrent investigations that are going on.
So they have shared this information with you.
You know the answer to the question.
You just refuse to answer the question from the member of Congress who has subpoenaed you to be here.
Is there a different answer to that question?
I was always willing to come here and testify before this oversight hearing.
Beautiful.
Then let's do that.
Let's for once have your actions match your words.
So you've been in communication with the FBI.
You know the answers and you refuse to tell us the answers.
So I will ask you again.
You know how many shell casings were on that roof.
What is the answer to that question?
What is the answer to that question?
I think it's pertinent to talk to you about the information that the Secret Service has and that the Secret Service knows related to the event.
I'm asking you an answer to the question.
If you're supposed to be in charge, if the buck stops with you, how come you can't share the answers?
What are you covering up?
What are you hiding, my friend?
I'm not covering anything up.
Then why can't you answer a simple question?
I would leave it to the criminal investigation to answer questions related to that.
Now here's Cheadle admitting to the United States, or admitting that the United States Secret Service does not have radio comms recordings from July 13th, all in the context of mentioning that they do sometimes, typically, record radio comms.
But for some reason on the 13th, they've got nothing.
Absolutely terrifying here.
This is nine.
Clip number nine, please.
unidentified
Does the Secret Service routinely record communications between and amongst detail?
Radio communications?
Any communication.
Email communications are captured as well as text messages, and then depending on the detail, radio communications are recorded.
Does the Secret Service have recorded communications from the July 13th event?
We do not have radio communications from that day.
In this day and age, that you wouldn't have radio communications recorded, it's unfathomable.
Even just for the sake of history, you would think that that would be the kind of thing that would be recorded and, you know, if declassified years later, saved in the Library of Congress so 100 or 200 years from now, people could go back when they write their dissertations about 21st century US politics, they could actually cite and use radio comms and play the recordings and make documentaries.
It's just a no-brainer that you would do that.
And so I think they had them, and I think they deleted them, or they're pretending they didn't have them.
There's no way.
You're telling me that the NSA, the entity that's been found, proven by Edward Snowden to record all of our webcam footage, all of our cell phone microphones, all of our cell phone cams, all of our text messages, all of our emails, all the microphones, even when our phone is off, And all of our devices are recording everything we say, saving it into a database that's being analyzed by AI and others for keywords to determine whether or not there's a threat.
You're telling me that they record everything in the United States of America except for the radio communications of Secret Service the day that there's an assassination attempt on the life of President Trump.
I mean, even AOC, if not accidentally, Ask some very telling questions.
Very interesting questions.
I couldn't believe that from AOC we saw this level of reason and competence.
You established earlier that the building upon which the shooter operated from was outside of that established perimeter, correct, for the Butler Pennsylvania event?
The individual used an AR-15 in order to act out his assassination attempt.
An AR-15 has a range of about 400 to 600 yards.
My question is why does the Secret Service perimeter, why is the Secret Service protective perimeter shorter than one of the most popular semi-automatic weapons in the United States?
unidentified
There are a number of weapons out there with a number of ranges.
Again, an advance was completed.
The determination of the perimeter, I'm not going to speak to specifics, but there are a number of factors that are taken into account when we determine our perimeter.
Some of it has to do with terrain, some of it has to do with buildings, some of it has to do with assets and resources that are available.
And so what I'm hearing is that a perimeter was not established outdoors, in an outdoor venue, that would prevent an AR-15, which is one of the most common weapons used in mass shootings, from being able to be within the range of Secret Service protection.
unidentified
The perimeter was established and even though there were buildings that were outside of that perimeter, it wasn't just that building.
There were a number of buildings in the area and there was you're telling me created that the most common firearm was common rifle in the United States of America.
As a range of somewhere between 4 to 1200.
Yards.
And, uh.
They didn't establish a perimeter and outside event.
That would take that into consideration.
Let alone the vantage point that we showed with the with the rooftop videos.
On the roof and from the window where the Secret Service was allegedly stationed.
A great question from AOC there.
Maybe she was thinking or trying to angle how dangerous AR-15s are.
But it ultimately ended up being a very good question.
This is quote number 16.
Pat Fallon.
How did a 20-year-old loner with a week's notice pick the absolute best location to assassinate the former President Donald Trump?
You gotta see this.
unidentified
How did a 20-year-old loner with a week's notice pick the absolute best location to assassinate President Trump when the entire Secret Service missed it?
Director Chito, under your leadership, your agency got outsmarted and outmaneuvered by a 20-year-old.
How can we have any confidence that you could stop a trained professional from a nefarious nation-state?
Why We Left Google00:15:50
unidentified
Those are absolutely questions that we need to have answers to.
I know they're questions, but you know, the fact of the matter is we can't have that confidence.
Director, do you have the ability personally, do you have the authority to beef up security of any of your protectees?
Yes, I do.
Okay.
So were you also aware there was a credible threat President Trump was facing?
He was facing a heightened security threat to a foreign adversary?
Ultimately when push comes to shove, it's obvious after all the questioning that there was a cover-up, that Secret Service knew this was going to happen or at least allowed it to happen intentionally.
And I think Nancy Mase said it best here in clip number 21.
unidentified
My first question.
Both sides of the aisle today have asked for your resignation.
Would you like to use my five minutes to draft your resignation letter, yes or no?
No, thank you.
Was this a colossal failure?
It was a failure.
Yes or no?
Was it a colossal failure is the question.
Yes or no?
I have admitted this is a terrible question.
This is a yes or no series of questions.
Was this a colossal failure?
Yes or no?
Yes.
Have you provided a list to the Oversight Committee?
Yes or no.
I'll have to get back to you on that.
That is a no.
Have you provided all audio and video recordings in your possession to this committee, as we asked on July 15th, yes or no?
I don't believe you and neither do the people watching this hearing.
You're not doing well as Mr. Moskowitz informed you.
You've been sitting here for over three hours and I have you know the entire country is demanding you resign and demanding that you be fired if you do not resign.
Things are not going well for you.
You need to answer the questions.
Was there a protective intelligence team and what technical resources were utilized for that event, specifically drone or helicopter assets?
unidentified
There were a number of technical assets that were deployed for that event, and there was a protective intelligence team that was assigned to that event.
We're going to wrap up the coverage of the congressional hearing yesterday about the assassination attempt on Trump and Secret Service's failures, not failures in their security protocol, but their failure at the attempt of Donald Trump's life.
I just want to wrap up with this 35-second clip of Marjorie Taylor Greene really just bringing it in on the Kim Cheadle interrogation yesterday.
Apparently even Raskin signed a document calling for her resignation after yesterday's hearing.
So this is bipartisan.
Everybody thinks that this woman should no longer be in the position that she's in.
And the only reason I can think of that she's still in the job at all is that Mayorkas is trying to keep her quiet.
He knows that as soon as he fires her, he no longer has any leverage over her.
And then she becomes a security risk and that she could become a whistleblower Regarding the details nature of what really happened.
So she is covering up right now for Mayorkas for her own actions.
For this assassination attempt because she wants to keep her job, but she knew.
This is going to happen.
I believe Secret Service knew this was going to happen.
Not all the agents, not all of them.
Obviously, when you have a conspiracy like this, you include the fewest amount of people possible in order to keep it just airtight.
And less vulnerable to exposure and being compromised or undermined.
But I think Cheadle knew.
I think Mayorkas knew.
I think there was a stand down order.
Just a handful of people had to know in order for this to come about.
The reason they don't have the radio comms is because they identified the suspicious person.
She admitted that they identified the suspicious person for what?
Was it as long as 30 minutes?
Over 20 minutes?
Apparently they knew he was suspicious before Donald Trump even took the stage.
He was allowed to take the stage.
This person is being sighted with a firearm, identified by law enforcement, witnessed by law enforcement who climbed the ladder, identified by the crowd.
People are pointing at him saying, shooter on the roof, shooter on the roof.
Nothing is done for minute after minute after minute.
If they couldn't stop the shooter, the least they could have done is gotten Donald Trump off the stage.
This was a coup.
This was an inside job.
They tried the deep state, specifically the Secret Service.
The Department of Homeland Security, the CIA, the FBI, they tried to kill President Trump.
You can talk about Iran all day long.
You can talk about loan shooters all day long.
You talk about Antifa all day long.
But when push comes to shove, this was an inside job.
The Deep State, just like they killed John F. Kennedy in 1963, attempted to take the life of Donald J. Trump.
And why is it that everybody seems to be conducting an investigation as to what happened On July 13th, except for the entities responsible for conducting an investigation, we hear nothing from the Secret Service.
We hear nothing from the DHS.
We hear nothing from the Department of Justice.
We hear nothing from the CIA.
We hear nothing from the FBI.
But we see reports after reports of independent journalists going on the roof.
We see report after report of independent journalists identifying the cell phone data.
I mean, I'm not sure if any of you guys saw this.
But somebody actually did an analysis of the cell phone data and was able to track where the shooter had been going in recent weeks.
Where other people who had been visiting his home or place of work had been going.
He realized somebody had been visiting him at either work or home and then repeatedly going to D.C.
The FBI headquarters, apparently, based on the advertising cellular data.
We don't know who that person was, but why is it that somebody is visiting the deep state repeatedly and then visiting this would-be assassin repeatedly in the weeks leading up to this assassination attempt?
He's identified as a suspicious person.
He's able to fly a drone over this event.
They're making up lies about the slant roof, sloped roof thing.
She's not answering any questions, and then she's using the excuse That it's only been nine days to the event when they knew probably 90 days before the event that all of this was going to play out.
This was an inside job and I want to see heads roll.
I'm not calling for literal violence.
I mean, politically, I want to see heads roll politically for this.
There need to be prosecutions.
She needs to be fired and prosecuted.
There need to be investigations.
I hope Donald Trump wins on November 5th, if not for Just for the reason that in January, when he has inaugurated, the storm will really come.
I want to see Donald Trump bring these people to justice for the first time since the establishment of the military-industrial complex during and after World War II.
I want to see all of these people go to prison before they go straight to hell!
I mean it is absolutely unbelievable to me that this happens time and time again.
Decade after decade.
Project Mockingbird.
MKUltra.
Vietnam.
Kennedy assassination.
Reagan shot.
CIA coups taking over.
Both the Bushes.
War in Afghanistan.
War in Iraq over weapons of mass destruction that didn't exist.
9-11 stand downs.
Pearl Harbor stand downs.
Over and over again.
How many more times are we going to fall for it before heads are going to roll?
I mean, seriously.
How many more times are we going to fall for this before heads are going to roll?
I want to see Mayorkas in prison.
I want to see both the Bidens in prison, probably Jill too for covering up for her son being a pedophile, which is illegal in Delaware.
I want to see Cheadle in prison.
I want to see all of these leftists in prison, not because I disagree with their political persuasion, but because I disagree with their acts of treason over and over again.
Clearly a crime in the Constitution of the United States of America.
But in the name of democracy, they sent all of our money to Nazis in Ukraine, despite the fact that Ukraine canceled all of its elections, and it's apparently the democracy.
I mean, Russia has more elections than Ukraine these days.
And in the name of democracy, they're running a candidate who was not elected in a primary.
It wouldn't be the first time that they did this.
Remember when they pushed Bernie out in 2016 for Hillary?
This is gonna blow back in their face so hard.
The Democratic Party is the least democratic party of any of the parties in the history of politics in the United States of America.
The Democratic Party is the party of tyranny.
And the only time they avow democracy, the only time they talk about how much they love democracy is because they know that it's conducive to their success to use that rhetoric and because they know that the leading cause of tyranny itself is democracy.
Every single tyranny has started out as democracy in the history of our civilization.
It is only a constitutional republic which is designed to be a stalwart or an obstacle to this tyranny.
I am so sick of it.
I was, you know, I like Donald Trump.
I don't even just like him.
I love Donald Trump.
But I was disappointed.
He made that epic, famous statement where he said, last week I took a bullet for democracy.
And I know that he means well and he's using the colloquial sense of the term democracy, but to hell with democracy!
This is not a democracy.
The word isn't mentioned once in our constitution.
This is a constitutional republic with democratic processes, but it is not a democracy.
Screw democracy.
I hate democracy.
If we need to overcome anything in this country, it is democracy because that is the rule of the mob over the rights of the individual.
I mean, you want to see a video of democracy, maybe the crew can pull up the famous video of Rodney King, where the majority of people in that video decided that it was right to beat up the minority in that video, not a minority by race, but a minority by virtue of being an individual.
No, we have inalienable rights given to us at birth by God himself, at conception by God himself.
And no mob, no number of people, even if it's 99.9999% of people, Has the right to vote away your rights.
To hell with democracy.
And let's just see for a second, what democracy has done in places like California.
Most democratic state of the union probably.
Democratic, leftist, socialist, left coast, California.
Where now they've passed legislation where if your children are in public school, None of the teachers or administrators at that school can tell the parents legally that your child is identifying as transgender.
And now they could even be legally providing your child with puberty blockers, hormone therapy, resources for transition to another sex, without even telling you.
unidentified
Just look at what they did to Elon Musk here in clip three. - It happened to one of my older boys, where I was, I was essentially tricked into signing documents for one of my I was essentially tricked into signing documents for one of my older boys, This was before I had really any understanding of what was going on.
We had COVID going on, so there was a lot of confusion.
And, you know, I was told Xavier might commit suicide.
That was a lie right from the outset?
Incredibly evil.
And I agree with you that people that have been promoting this should go to prison.
So I was, I was straight into doing this, um, and, uh, you know, it wasn't explained to me that puberty blockers are actually just sterilization drugs.
Um, so, um, anyway, uh, and so I lost my son, essentially.
Uh, so, you know, they, uh, they call it deadnaming for a reason.
Alright, so the reason it's called deadnaming is because, uh, your son is dead.
So my son Xavier is dead.
Killed by the woke wine virus.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Yeah.
I can't imagine what that would be like.
Yeah.
So... Um... Yeah, and there's lots of people in that situation now.
Right.
It's not pretty.
And lots of demolished kids.
Yes.
Yeah, well, that's a good reason to be the final straw.
All right, so let's... So I vowed to destroy the woke mind virus after that.
Well, democracy may be on the ballot, but the republic is too.
And I'm voting for the republic.
I will choose a republic over democracy every single time.
Thank God Joe Biden is not the candidate.
It would have been nice if he was candidate.
Cause it would have been easier for Trump to win, but thank God he's done.
He's out.
He'll never have a political career ever again.
I don't think he's even going to draw breath by November 5th.
And you know, we all knew it was going to happen.
Everybody really knew this was going to happen.
Vivek was among the earliest to call it, Roger Stone, probably the earliest to call it, but I want to show you this clip of Vivek, clip number six on Fox News with Kayleigh McEnany, where she asks him about his prediction.
Look, I think that the reality is the managerial class around Biden has lost their use for him.
This has been obvious to me since last year.
Play out the incentives.
He is not the strongest candidate they can put up.
And these people, they have stopped at nothing to keep Donald J. Trump out of office.
You think they're going to stop at this step?
I think it's actually one different game they're playing, Kayleigh, is they want this to happen as late as possible into the cycle.
They want it to be in the honeymoon phase of a new candidate.
Initially, you get that honeymoon phase before the scrutiny comes.
If that swap-out comes in August, or even after August, they get to put up a candidate who will not yet have had the scrutiny, keep Republicans guessing, and that's, I think, the game that's actually going on here.
And the reality is, I think there's only two viable choices, really, if you think about it.
The Democratic Party is wedded to identity politics.
The only reason Kamala Harris got that job, frankly, is because she was a black woman.
Don't take my words, take it from the words of the Democratic Party itself.
Which leaves Kamala Harris or Michelle Obama.
That's where I predict this plot ends, and I don't think it's going to happen particularly soon.
I think it's in their incentive to wait as long as possible, and that's exactly where I think the game goes from here.
Obviously, the Democratic Party is in absolute chaos right now.
They're trying to rally as quickly as possible around this new candidate, Kamala Harris.
But we're not going to know for sure who the candidate is going to be, I don't think, until the convention in August, the virtual convention in August.
It makes sense why they did it virtually now and why they pushed it back so late now, doesn't it?
Because they knew this was going to happen months ago.
It's all part of the plan.
But let's see what the leftists are saying about this new chaos in clip 17.
unidentified
Trump and Republicans wasted their entire convention attacking a guy who was no longer their opponent.
Now, this will not be easy, but it could work just because Biden endorses Harris doesn't mean she has to be the nominee.
I would be fine with an open process.
You know, I was getting texts yesterday from other hosts and pundits and different people, everybody saying, David, are you?
Do you want an open convention or do you want Harris?
Well, I would love an open convention and I believe Kamala Harris will win the nomination.
I believe that Joe Biden made a very difficult decision, but he chose what he believes ultimately is better for the country.
He brought us the best COVID recovery among developed Western nations.
He brought us a sustained level of low unemployment, the likes of which we've not seen for decades.
He did dozens of important things that I've enumerated before.
And this really epitomizes America first.
This is not Trump first.
This is not Biden first.
And it makes it now a referendum on Trump.
My colleague John actually texted me about this.
He said, I think what's interesting about this is the election had become a referendum on Biden, on Biden's cognitive state, on Biden's achievements.
And the fact that Trump's deranged and has a terrible record himself as president is no longer the question.
This now puts it back to being a referendum on Trump and to some degree, a referendum on do Democrats put someone forward that can win?
Now, you are going to see over the next several weeks the opportunities for the racial gaffes and the misogynist gaffes against Kamala Harris by Trump and others.
I believe that we are already seeing examples of that.
The age gap as the Republican Party is now putting forward the oldest presidential nominee in American history.
I say that tongue-in-cheek.
Of course, Biden would have been the oldest nominee if he accepted the nomination.
He didn't.
So, indeed, Trump will now be the oldest nominee in American history.
In two to three weeks- Oh, so now age matters.
I believe it will be a completely revitalized ecosystem.
Now they're saying it's going to be a referendum on Trump's presidency from four years ago, even though Kamala Harris is just as responsible, culpable, and complicit in the Biden administration's failure after failure.
He misrepresents data time and time again in this video by using things like record unemployment when everybody is working three part-time jobs.
Doesn't mention all the failures like the border, things like that.
Says there's going to be an open convention and he hopes there's going to be an open convention, but he thinks Kamala is going to win.
We'll see about that.
I think right now what we are witnessing from the left is an attempt to influence the people to rally them behind Kamala.
And when that doesn't happen, they're going to stab her in the back just like they stabbed Joe Biden in the back.
They're going to drop her so fast.
And I foresee a resignation from the presidency either by death or just totally resigning from Joe Biden before this election, maybe even before this convention.
I think Kamala Harris is going to be the president of the United States almost certainly before the election, probably even before the convention next month.
And I think I'm not positive on this one, but I really think that somehow they are going to subvert Kamala Harris as the candidate and we're going to see somebody else pop out of this convention next month.
This is a time to be alive, folks.
Please go to InfoWarsStore.com.
Be the reason that we're still on the air.
Check out all of our amazing products like the Life Select Storable Food, 25-Year Shelf Life.
Get the Alexa Pure Water Filters.
Get the Infowars MD line and be the reason that we are still on the earth.
unidentified
Welcome back to the American Journal, ladies and gentlemen. ladies and gentlemen.
Kamala campaign sentence, vetting materials to slew of VP candidates with one notable exception.
Kamala Harris 2024 presidential campaign sent vetting materials to a slew of VP candidates on Monday with one notable exception, Kentucky governor Andy Beshear.
So he endorses her amid VP speculation, but she's not even vetting him.
Citing an unnamed source familiar with the matter, Wall Street Journal White House reporter Ken Thomas reported that several potential vice presidential picks had been contacted.
Mark Kelly, who Laura Loomer just did an outstanding job of diving into some of his daughter's behavior on social media, including the use of controlled substances.
She deleted her social media accounts after that reporting came out.
You got to check her out.
I mean, she's unleashed.
North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper.
Josh Shapiro.
Good luck getting the Shapiro in with all the Palestinian supporters that are on the left.
But Pritzker, a lot of people don't know this, heavily involved in Stratton Oakmont in the beginning.
Stratton Oakmont being the investment firm made famous by the Wolf of Wall Street.
So, if he's the Canada, I mean, that level of corruption could put Chris Christie to shame.
And Gretchen Whitmer, I mean, they want like a dynamic duo.
The two ladies just going up and just... Gretchen Whitmer is another example that looks, she looks like a bird.
Kamala does it so much.
Nikki Haley, Jill Biden, Gretchen Whitmer, all birds.
So if she does the Gretchen thing, I'm going to lose my mind.
And the white male thing is a struggle, but I think it's going to be Mark Kelly, and I'll tell you why I think it's gonna be Mark Kelly, because all of a sudden, out of nowhere, the Biden administration, the other Democratic leaders are just talking about how exciting it is to go back to the moon again, go back to the moon again.
And wasn't Mark Kelly a NASA astronaut?
Or NASA employee.
I think they're priming it up for ramping up NASA.
They want him in as the VP.
They want to ramp up our Space Force, our satellites.
They want to get themselves independent from Elon Musk's SpaceX because he's not playing ball with the political left and the globalist agenda.
It's going to be Mark Kelly.
She might even have to announce it before the convention.
In order to try to win the convention, but my bet Mark Kelly 100%.
Can't just be any old white male.
Can't be the Jewish guy.
I don't have a problem with Jewish people, but there's no way that Democrats are going to select a Jewish vice president.
Gretchen Whitmer, not too much, too much J6 fake kidnapping stuff associated with her.
J.B.
Pritzker, way too corrupt, but part of the Democratic machine.
I mean, definitely somebody who would be connected.
And so, Spaceman Hero and Kamala Harris are gonna run.
And in this world of just no surety, no confidence, no understanding of what's really gonna happen, one thing is abundantly clear, this is a crazy time to be alive.
And people are saying, oh, was JD Vance The wrong choice given that Kamala Harris is actually the candidate.
First of all, Donald Trump knew a month ago that Kamala Harris was going to be the candidate.
The video, quote, leaked of him saying in the golf cart, oh, he made the decision to resign.
It's going to be Kamala.
She's even better for us.
She's terrible.
She's just the worst.
He knew when he selected J.D.
Vance that J.D.
Vance was not going to need to debate against Kamala Harris, in my opinion.
And it's a shame because it really is unfair That all of the campaigning, all the preparation that the Democrats have done to run against Joe Biden has turned out to be a waste now that they've introduced an ambush candidate.
I just gotta say, this entire system of ours is about, you gotta persuade voters.
You gotta win their votes.
You don't decide who the president is in smoke-filled rooms with billionaires and senior elected officials.
You let the people decide.
That's what we believe in this room, and that's what we're gonna fight for.
I promise you.
So I just -- and by the way, talking about take backs, I was told I was going to get to debate Kamala Harris, and now President Trump's going to get to debate her.
This was obviously a coup, and this was a bait-and-switch ambush situation.
None of their parties represented, and I hope they feel the bitterness they should feel about this.
Rather than being blinded by their hatred of Donald Trump, they should realize they didn't even choose their own candidate, and we witnessed a soft coup this weekend.
Clip number 19.
unidentified
Well, the Democrats just pulled off a coup.
Where's Joe Biden right now?
Has anyone seen this guy?
Look, you don't have to go full conspiracy theorist to see that Biden was clearly forced out today.
Just 48 hours ago, he was definitely staying in the race.
I think his campaign chair went on CBS this morning and said Biden was for sure staying in.
But Pelosi and Obama and all the billionaire donors, they had other plans.
So they gave Joe the ultimatum.
And in doing so, they threw out the results of their own primary election.
Essentially saying to the voters, hey, get lost.
You don't matter.
We decided, and that's called democracy.
See, the Democrats, they insist they're the party of democracy.
How many times do they say that?
Yet they're about to install a nominee for president who didn't win a primary, who didn't even herself get a single vote in the primary.
Oh, but she'll earn the nomination at the convention.
No, no, no, this is preordained.
The only reason the Obamas and Pelosi aren't endorsing Kamala right now is it would just seem too heavy handed.
They want her to be able to pretend that she earned this.
But one thing is clear, Kamala will not earn the support of voters in November.
Remember, we Republicans, we bucked our party establishment to elect President Trump.
And when we do it again in November, the Democrats will see what democracy actually looks like.
It's the leading cause ...of tyranny, and democracy always leads to this DEI crap, which leads to the Cheeto crap, which leads to the corruption crap... ...and death.
Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheadle resigned following widespread outrage over how her agency failed to prevent the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a Pennsylvania campaign rally earlier this month.
Cheadle's resignation came a day after she was blasted by members of a House committee at a hearing on the Secret Service actions leading up to Trump's July 13th rally in Butler Township.
The move comes as lawmakers and an internal government watchdog move forward with investigations into the agency's handling of Trump's protection and how a gunman came close to the killing of the president.
There were bipartisan calls, signatures yesterday.
She's out.
She's gone.
She's fired.
Now, this means Mayorkas is probably going to, almost definitely going to, appoint somebody new.
We'll be interested to see what happens there.
But this is basically an admission of guilt.
Not necessarily an admission of being complicit in the assassination attempt of Donald Trump, but an admission of being responsible by either negligence or intentional complacence for this assassination attempt on Donald Trump.
An assassination attempt which Donald Trump Jr.
says has changed his father.
Mobile data is shown as we've gone over and over again.
Suggests was an inside job in MKUltra level coup.
So we're going to see more developments of this.
Make sure you stay tuned today because Alex Jones is going to be in the studio in an hour and 11 minutes broadcasting about this.
Owen Schroer has been doing an outstanding job.
Covering all of this news over the course of the last 30 days.
So make sure you stay tuned, and I'm going to give out the number now to give the crew a chance to screen some calls.
For the final hour of the show today, I do want to take all of your calls.
The sooner you call, the more likely I am to get to you.
And so now that Cheadle is out, now that Kamala is the leading candidate for the Democrats and we have yet to determine for sure who the candidate is going to be, only one thing remains.
How much longer will Joe Biden remain the president of the United States?
And even though we heard from him in voice only yesterday, no one's seen the guy for six days.
Many have speculated that he's already dead.
There were speculations yesterday that he was in hospice, which I don't think were true yet, but it does seem like he's weeks away from dying.
Based on some of the remarks that his brother made to the press, they want to enjoy what time they have left with Joe.
But let's see Tucker Carlson asking where Biden is in clip number four here.
I got a weird lead on a story people ought to look into.
I got a call from a source close to Las Vegas Metro Police.
The official story was that Biden's trip was cut short last week due to COVID.
However, according to this source, U.S.
Secret Service informed Las Vegas Metro that there was an emergency situation involving Joe Biden And to close necessary streets so that POTUS could be transported immediately to University Medical, which they began to do in earnest.
Then, mysteriously, there was a stand-down order and the Secret Service informed local Vegas PD that they were going to medivac POTUS to Johns Hopkins, which they presume meant fly him back east as soon as possible.
Apparently, the rumor mill in the police department was that Joe Biden was dying or already dead, possibly.
I didn't think too much about this lead.
It seemed too wild to be true.
But given that Joe Biden has been out of public sight for days and dropped out of the race via an ex-post, and his brother James indicated health was a factor, I'm beginning to grow more curious if COVID or something else has been more serious than reported.
If anyone with Las Vegas Metro has information, please email freedom at charliekirk.com.
I want to hear if there's more to the official story than what they're telling us.
unidentified
Well, I'm sure Las Vegas Metro would be just as open and forthcoming as they were during the October shooting in 2017.
I think he had a stroke and I think he's on his way out.
And it's just a matter of weeks.
But now we have reports from the Democrats that Harris earns $231 million in donations on first day of presidential campaign.
And we're going to show you a clip, an older clip from O'Keefe about ActBlue and explain how that ties in here.
But Vice President Kamala Harris claimed a stunning $231 million from small and big donors in the first 24 hours since she launched her presidential campaign and a huge vote of confidence for her still nascent campaign.
Harris won $81 million in small dollar donations and reportedly scored an additional $150 million money bomb from big donors.
So which one's the party of the elite?
Which candidate's the candidate of the elite?
And what amount of the biggest one-day haul of the 2024 election cycle?
Now remember, ActBlue is responsible for much of the Democratic Party donations.
And if you remember anything from the O'Keefe reporting months ago about ActBlue, you can download the list.
It's public information.
of the names and addresses information of who actually made donations to act blue and determine who they are you can see it it's it's public information if you if you donate over a certain amount it's got to be reported and it was discovered that it's seemingly Soros backed entities or others We're making donations beyond the legal limit through existing ActBlue donors.
So if you're somebody who maybe one time gave $100 to ActBlue, then thousands of dollars were coming in through your name from these shadow organizations or entities so they could donate beyond the legal limit to this organization to support campaigns like Kamala Harris's campaign.
And then O'Keefe went from door to door knocking on these people's doors.
Normal working class people, they open their house and they say, hey, have you ever given any money to ActBlue or a Democratic candidate?
They say, yeah, I think I gave $20.
Yeah, I think I gave $100 a few months ago to ActBlue.
And then he would say, well, did you give $4,500?
They say, no, I never gave $4,500.
I don't have that kind of money.
Well, it says here in the reporting and the public filing, it says here that you gave thousands of dollars.
Oh, no, it wasn't me.
So they're using these people on the rolls to launder money into the party.
Let's go ahead and run the clip just for a little bit.
FEC data shows that some senior citizens across the U.S.
have been donating thousands of times per year.
Some of these individuals' names and addresses are attached to over $200,000 in contributions.
We went and knocked on a few of their doors to corroborate the data that we received from a group of citizen journalists called Election Watch in Maryland.
This is James O'Keefe with OMG.
I'm here in Annapolis, Maryland.
It's an individual who has donated a total of $217,000 made through 12,000 different contributions in a three-year period of time.
Now, sometimes these contributions have been made in variations of his name and variations of his address.
You see this chart here?
This chart shows a breakdown of the committees that were earmarked to receive the donations made through ActBlue.
unidentified
When Mitch McConnell moved fast to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, more than $70 million went to left-leaning candidates and causes in a day.
Shattering records this campaign cycle for the online fundraising juggernaut, ActBlue.
So far, folks have used our platform to donate $3.8 billion to over 21,000 different candidates, committees, and organizations.
The nearly 13 million donors who save their information in the ActBlue system can make a contribution in seconds.
Is there any Democrat practically in this country that doesn't use ActBlue now?
We work with pretty much everybody on the federal level and we work all the way down to local school board races.
I have raised approximately $560,000.
With ActBlue, Coral Evans has a real shot at winning a perennially Republican Arizona House seat.
If you are receiving this transmission, the backup has been unlocked from the archives of the InfoWars Command Center, located in what is now the uninhabitable city of Austin, Texas.
Artificial intelligence has advanced and been weaponized by a global New World Order.
Despite its use by servants of evil at the highest levels, discoveries have been made which have made it possible to broadcast this transmission to you at this point in history, in your own timeline.
It's too late for me and other Patriots to change our fate, but you can change the course of your own future with the information I'm about to reveal to you.
Shortly after the election in 2024, there was a global economic crisis.
The crisis was used as an excuse to launch World War III in order to catalyze economic development and establish a one-world government and monetary system.
The globalists orchestrated the collapse of the financial markets, spreading fear and chaos.
Banks closed their doors, currencies lost their value, and people were left desperate and vulnerable.
In the ensuing chaos, the World War III was ignited, not as a war between nations, but as a war orchestrated by the global elite to consolidate power.
Billions were conscripted as AI was used to fill the void of domestic labor.
Soldiers marched to the front lines, while back home, AI systems took over factories, farms, and businesses.
Human workers were replaced, and unemployment skyrocketed, leaving people dependent on government rations and AI-controlled services.
After the surface of the Earth was rendered almost completely uninhabitable by nuclear radiation, prisoners of war, political prisoners, and draftees were sent to deep underground military bases.
These bases, sprawling labyrinths beneath the earth, became the last refuge for humanity.
But these weren't just shelters.
They were places of horror.
Inside, these prisoners were exposed to DMT drifts, as their hearts were stopped while blood was artificially pumped through their bodies.
This was an effort to possess humanity with hidden knowledge that was thought to be able to allow the unification of the species.
The Globalists, in their twisted pursuit of power, developed the technology to stop aging through this very process of sending people to communicate with interdimensional beings of much higher intelligence.
And as a result of this success, they believe that by sending people to a higher dimension, they could unlock the secrets of the universe and seize total power for themselves.
But instead, subjects of these experiments began to become possessed by these interdimensional beings and were subjugated under a new world order named One World Nation.
These demonic entities thrive on fear and pain and so they turned the underground bases into hellish prisons where the screams of the tormented echoed endlessly.
Satanic elites began to bask in various states of euphoria.
Only those who are pure of heart were able to defy this process.
Amidst this nightmare, a few brave souls resisted.
Instead of being possessed by demonic entities, they were possessed by a holy spirit and able to escape to establish a resistance.
But, you know, I was pleased to see her resignation just about an hour ago or so, or in the last 30 minutes.
Reports are in that she's finally resigned.
But, you know, it was reminiscent of Jen Psaki and Karine Jean-Pierre.
And that when you watch Jen Psaki or Karine Jean-Pierre, as they perform their roles, She looked scared.
secretary, you could tell that their job was just to lie on behalf of the regime.
And when we saw Cheadle yesterday at this hearing, she was just keeping her mouth shut, covering for and lying on behalf of the regime.
I mean, I knew it was going to be bad, but I didn't know it was going to be that bad.
Travis, what do you think?
unidentified
She looked scared.
She didn't even have a lie to tell.
And that's one of the reasons why it feels to me somebody just threw her to the wall.
And they were like, you're gonna go here, you're gonna keep your mouth shut, you're gonna go through the motions, and the whole thing just seems ridiculous.
Well, imagine how scared you would be if you had information that could compromise the organization or regime or entities that you know are aware of the assassination attempt of political opponents.
I mean, this is why Joe Biden was shaken up after this assassination attempt.
This is why we're seeing Cheadle and others behave very bizarrely.
They're all shaken up because they realize the audacity of these organizations to commit murder for the sake of their own political agenda.
And they realize that they're a perceived risk to these organizations.
Absolutely.
unidentified
Absolutely.
It just seems to me that I don't want to defend her because I think she's terrible.
But it's almost like she just had no clue about what had happened.
It was very much akin to North Korea fake trial confession.
Like when you see Otto Warmbier or when you see Vietnam soldiers who were captured on video confessing to how great they're being treated in the camps.
It was like, I mean at one point I think I even joked that she was blinking, I think it was her, she was blinking the words torture.
Yeah, well obviously we always want to follow the law.
It's just, man, it's such dangerous territory, though, Jake.
I appreciate your call, though, and I share your sentiment.
Leon in Montreal.
Leon, what's on your mind?
unidentified
I think that this whole thing pivots on two points, okay?
The starting of the shooting and the stopping of the shooting.
And apparently there were two cops.
One was lifting the other one, saw the shooter, The shooter aimed his rifle at him, he fell off, then they called it in, and then the cop said he started shooting.
So if he started shooting after he called it in, that means that if there was a second shooter, that was his cue to start shooting, because Crooks would not have had enough time to turn his rifle back towards Trump, take his aim, get back his composure, and take the shot.
that or after he said that after he said shooter is down if there was another shot then that means that was the second shooter interesting that's a good point leon no i appreciate that and what's what's even crazier about this to me regardless of whether there was a second shooter or not it's obvious that this was a deep state setup because we have this report from yesterday that This is on Infowars.com.
Whose device is this?
Mobile data shows someone that regularly visited Trump shooter's home and work also visited a building in D.C.
near the FBI office.
The Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project just released mobile ad data analysis that shows someone who regularly visited Trump's would-be assassin Thomas Crooks home and work Also visited a building in Washington D.C.
near an FBI office.
Quote, we found the assassin's connections through our in-depth analysis of mobile ad data to track movements of Crooks and his associates that oversight project in an X thread Monday.
To do this, we tracked devices that regularly visited both Crooks home and place of work and followed them.
The Oversight Project found that someone who regularly visited Crook's home and work also visited a building in Washington, D.C.
located in Gallery Place.
This is in the same vicinity of an FBI office on June 26, 2023, weeks before the assassination attempt, said the investigative body.
Whose device is this?
We've got these credible reports that the Deep State was in connection with Crooks weeks in advance.
We know that he flew the drone around ahead of time.
We know that the FBI reported this to Secret Service.
They did nothing.
We know that he was identified as a suspicious individual before shots were even fired.
Even Cheadle herself admitted this in the hearing yesterday.
It was one of the few things she actually admitted.
That the threat wasn't neutralized.
We know that law enforcement saw him before the shots were fired.
And it's been Abundantly clear for an extended period of time that something more than just a rogue lone wolf security oversight happened on July 13th.
Frankly, July 13th is everything that the left said J6 was.
Let's go to John in Minneapolis.
John, what's on your mind?
unidentified
Hi.
I ran across this picture and I just want to read it to you.
It's supposedly from the snipers that were on the roof, the two snipers that we saw.
It said, My name is Jonathan Willis.
I'm the officer in the famous photo of the two snipers on the roof at Trump's rally.
I came here to inform the public that I had the assassin in my sights for at least three minutes, but the head of the Secret Service refused to give the order to take out the perp.
100% the top brass prevented me from killing the assassin before he took the shots at President Trump.
And, I found this guy on X and I told him, run for your life, go undercover, and I got a reply back from one of his friends that said he took your advice, thank you.
But my point is, if they were to interview that guy, even if this isn't Jonathan Willis or whatever that guy's name is, He knows the story about this thing, and those other police officers know the story.
And you put this together with the sound of the shots going off, they were two different guns, obviously.
I mean, I'm not a, you know, I don't know about sound and all that kind of stuff, but they were totally different sound.
And you know, there was like three long shots, and there was bing, bing, bing, bing, bing, and then one to take the shooter out.
Very difficult to confirm the authenticity of the information.
But one thing we do know for sure, John, is Cheadle explicitly stated yesterday during the hearings that she had spoken with the Secret Service officer who neutralized the shooter, who shot the shooter in the head or neck or wherever he was shot.
Kind of looked like the bullet might have gone through his neck from some of the images that I've seen.
We know that she spoke to him.
She would not even share any of the details whatsoever, other than the fact that she spoke to him.
She would not say anything that transpired during that conversation, which is yet another example of a cover-up.
And I guess maybe people aren't as old as me, maybe don't even remember his wife is Gabby Giffords.
Now, she had been in politics going way back to 2001.
She was a member of the 13th District House of Representatives for Arizona.
She also was a 28th district member.
For 2003 to 2005, she was a senator and a representative, but in 2011, she got shot in the head in an assassination attempt and a mass shooting just outside of an office, I'm sorry, just out of Tucson during an event with her constituents.
And she survived?
Well, she did.
And over time, she was able to gain her ability to walk and speak and read and write.
I just realized that, hey, you know, if they pick Markelley, his wife had to resign.
As soon as Obama made his State of the Union speech on January 24, 2012, and she appeared on the floor the following day and she formally submitted, Her resignation.
So she knew she wasn't able to carry on.
She was able to live another year or whatever.
And she's still alive and I think she's still married to Mark Kelly, the astronaut.
That's why I'm bringing this whole thing up.
So if you think it's got a NASA angle, I'm saying it doesn't just have the NASA angle.
It's got the, hey, she didn't have a near miss in her head.
Hey Chase, I was reviewing the video footage over in Butler of Trump getting shot and after going frame by frame I think he was also shot in the torso.
If you look carefully you can see Um, that his shirt moved dramatically, and his whole body, using the pin and podium, moves about eight inches to the right.
Obviously, I'm not 100% sure, but we've all seen John Wick, and I do believe, given Trump being the mega-genius he is, and knowing that people will be going after his life, would be, uh, one of those people who would buy those super-advanced, bulletproof suits.
It just makes sense, you know, so I think the suit he was wearing.
Oh yeah, I see the ripple you're talking about, but it could have been the way that he kind of, it could have been the, your shirt will ripple when you, when you move your arms in.
Right before he ducked, he moved his arms in and I'm looking at my shirt even now as I do it.
It could be that he, just the way, but you're right, maybe he was, but I think that if he was shot twice, he would have admitted it.
I mean, there's no reason to cover up that information.
unidentified
Well, I think it would remove from the idea that it was a miracle or something, but I still think it's a religious miracle, even though if he was shot twice, because, you know, a big part of religion and a big part of God is like, you got to be actively involved.
You know, they say like, you know, trust in God, but tie up your camel, you know, roll away from the rocks.
Bumbling Philomenas, that's what the Australian news, they have a segment, Sky News, they said, Bumbling Philomenas.
But I want to say it's possible that the Secret Service directors, that she resigned because she doesn't want to get perjury charges against her.
And she had said that she used the app Signal because overseas, some of the law enforcement they collaborate with, They don't have the same technology as the Secret Service.
And then she said, two speakers later, I think, like ten minutes later, that she does not use Signal or any encrypted app, only she does that on her personal phone.
So she perjured herself there.
And she also said that the sniper didn't wait, that as soon as the threat was identified, he fired.
But like Dan Bongino pointed out, they had the sight set on him.
So they waited until the sniper fired.
And she also said they formed a human shield around the president when there was gunfire, when he was being shot at.
No, it was after the shooting was neutralized.
And they never asked her, which was appalling, about the height.
You know, should there be a height requirement?
One woman looked like a foot shorter than Trump, the one that couldn't holster a gun.
They specifically said, should she have been fired?
And why she was the most qualified should there be a human bunker, as she called it.
It's not a human bunker when his head is still exposed.
So it was a whole myriad of lies.
But they should have said, she's resigning.
She said, well, ask the FBI if I'm resigning.
Because she kept saying, ask the FBI.
But then towards the end, they started changing the phrasing of the question.
Well, the FBI told you, so you know the answer, so you tell us, but you still wouldn't.
But lastly, like the black Democrat woman was saying, oh, DEI didn't have anything to do with it, but I bet you if you ask President Obama, who's black, do you want a six, who's six foot one, do you want a five foot three female guarding you?
And Michelle Obama is 5'11", Melania is 5'11", with heels, you know, they're over six feet.
So I don't think they want a DEI when it comes to people protecting them.
But what do you think?
I'll hang up and listen about her resigning to avoid perjury charges and, you know, be brought up on charges.
I don't think it was the only variable though, because obviously when she went into this hearing, she was adamant that she would not resign.
She was adamant that she should not resign.
She said that she shouldn't resign at this time, that she should remain the Director of the Secret Service.
And I think that upon the fallout of how terrible that hearing was, hearing the rumors and plans of what members of Congress were going to do in response to that, It was enough to put her over the edge edge to resign.
I watched this morning that two things, Mike Adams and the man in America, that guy Seth, and all the other programs, you know, they don't show a very good picture of a man on top of that water tower there.
Just a shadow Alex had there.
That guy Seth had some footage and, uh, I could, I don't, you know, I'm 60 years old, but my eyes don't, you know, can't, can't not believe my eyes.
So it looks like a figure of a man up there.
Okay.
Granted, it would be difficult to get on and off the tower with the, you know, to get up onto the rungs of the tower to get up there.
But if this was a conspiracy, which we all kind of think it is, You know, I'm sure they worked together and that other guy yesterday, the sniper guy there, he said he would figure a way to get in and out of there through some kind of an alley or something.
I think the tower was far enough away that he probably took the shot, thought he completed the mission, got down out of there quick and in a hurry and left.
I don't know what to think about second shooters or not.
Obviously, if there was a second shooter, you'd want it in the same line of fire as the Patsy, probably behind the Patsy to ensure that the target was hit.
But I think if there are multiple shooters and it was done by a professional, I think it's less likely that they would have missed.
What I'm thinking here is that there doesn't need to be a second shooter in order for The conspiracy theory to be true that this was an inside job.
I think the Patsy was enough.
Patsy's not the right word.
I think that the Crooks guy was enough.
When you have him meeting with the same person who's going back and forth to the FBI office weeks in advance, according to the cell phone data, when you have all of these other variables where the Secret Service stood down, where they knew he was suspicious, where he flew the drone, where he was able to get on the roof, where the post didn't show up, it's obvious that this was a setup.
And I just don't think that they thought he was going to miss.
He said time and time again that he hoped that the collapse would come before he was elected because he doesn't want to be the one that's accused of it.
Great call.
Great points.
Frankie in Wisconsin.
Frankie, what's on your mind?
unidentified
Hey there.
So I'm going to date myself.
I do remember when Gabby Gifford was almost assassinated but was shot in the head.
And if Mark Kelly does become the VP, I believe I believe people are going to vote on emotion instead of logic and try to remove our Second Amendment.
I'd like to know why are we not discussing the fact that Kamala Harris is ineligible to be the president based on the fact that she's not a natural born citizen And the second question is, and I'd really like these answered.
And I know what you're saying, because neither of her parents were citizens of the United States, but she was born in Oakland, California, so I think that she's legally considered, whether this is what was intended by the Constitution or not, I think she's considered a U.S.
Right, neither of her parents were citizens of the United States, but I don't think either of your parents have to be citizens of the United States if you're physically born here.
I think the Constitution recognizes you as a natural-born citizen.
Yeah, which was probably not intended by the original founding fathers.
But you know, they amended every time they amend the Constitution, they screw it up.
Whenever they amend it to take away rights, or just narrow things they screwed up when they amended to expand the rights of the people.
It's good.
So I love the Bill of Rights.
But man, after those first 10 things get a little rocky.
But Julie, thank you for your call.
I appreciate it.
We've only got 43 seconds left before the next break.
After the next break, I am going to get to your calls.
I see Heather, Daryl, BS Assassin, John on the line.
I'll try to get to all of you if I can.
Four calls in one segment can be tough sometimes.
But in the meantime, please visit InfoWarsStore.com.
Be the reason that we're still on the air.
We know that our Republic is under attack.
Donald Trump is under attack.
Alex Jones is under attack.
His family is under attack.
Freedom of speech is under attack, America is under attack, and humanity itself is under attack.
The best way to fight back is to fight for your own health.
Invest in your own health at InfoWarsStore.com, all while keeping this operation on the air.
So please go to InfoWarsStore.com right now.
Now, save the republic.
Welcome back to the American Journal, ladies and gentlemen.
We have 10 minutes of your calls before the great Alex Jones takes over and hosts the Alex Jones Show today.
I want to get straight into it.
Let's go to Heather in Louisiana.
Heather, what is on your mind this morning?
unidentified
Hey Chase, good morning.
So I just wanted to give a quick take on Trump's fifth comp.
I watched him recount the incident When he was speaking at the RNC and he talks about looking down and seeing people's faces and realizing that they think he's dead.
Um, I remember I was at work, I watched it on TV and whenever he stood up and did the fist pump, I thought, Oh, he can move his arms and legs.
He's conscious.
He can talk.
And I just think, um, you know, that he's seen the JFK files.
You know that he's got to have thought about what he would do in an assassination attempt and I personally think that It's possible he was trying to give us proof of life, and I think he alluded to that.
And not only proof of life, but proof of fight, that he was still conscious, aware, not harmed seriously, so there would just be no doubt whatsoever that he was capable and competent in a way that just far superseded anything from the other side.
unidentified
Absolutely.
If he had been scooped up and thrown in that car, something else could have happened and it would have been blamed on the initial insult, possibly.
Well, what's on my mind is the Eagle Horizon 2024 federal-wide exercise that's taking place today and tomorrow.
This is a DHS and FEMA-coordinated program that gets together all the executive branch.
And let's see, it says the exercise focuses on coordination between the agencies.
Touch the executive branch continuity alert.
The group members are sent by the respective agencies to pre-planned alternate locations, and they're asked to implement continuity procedures.
I'm wondering if this is a coincidence that this is going on while we're seeing that Biden's missing, they're saying Kamala's the new president, all of this is happening, and now we have this quote-unquote exercise going on today and tomorrow, along with Netanyahu I think you're absolutely right.
Yep, and I guess she could technically be subpoenaed again, but now she's done.
So somebody else is going to be taking this whole thing over, and they're going to be able to appoint whoever they want who's going to be equipped and motivated and on board with covering it up.
So this is this is a good development because she should resign.
Obviously, she's either incompetent or corrupt or both.
I think both.
But it's also a scary development because they can now just put in another plug that plays game plays the ball with them.
They don't want you to think that way at first, so they want you to think that... Look, QC, I know you're a brilliant guy, and I love all of your calls.
I remember them.
So I'm not trying to be critical of you at all, but this was not... Nobody allows someone to shoot them in the ear from 450 yards away or 450 feet away.
He turns his head once, then he turns his head a second time.
The shot happened.
It doesn't matter who's on the other side who takes the bullet.
If they can send millions to their death by vaccine, if they can send millions to war and die, what makes you think one person behind the scenes dies in the result to accomplish their goal?
So Kamala Harris would not certify her own election.
So if she were to be elected to be president, the certification of the electoral colleges, the results would be overseen by the president of the Senate.
Uh, and that's the traditional, this is traditionally the role of the Vice President, but however, in the event of that conflict of interest, the task would either be delegated to another official, or basically to ensure impartiality and adherence to the protocols of the Senate and the Constitution.
If Joe Biden resigns as president of the United States before the election, and she becomes the president of the United States, the sitting president, how is the vice president selected?
Pardon my ignorance again on this process.
Does she just, does it automatically become the speaker or does she get to appoint who the VP is at that moment approved by Congress?
Do you know off the top of your head?
unidentified
Because I mean, I remember this was like a big conflict right there in the, you know, the Trump administration, right?
So like, yeah, it would be, I mean, yeah, sorry, misspoke, but the, yeah, it would be, it would be Johnson, right?
So the Speaker of the House would take that next role.
So we might have a situation in which Speaker Johnson confirms Kamala Harris as President of the United States.
If she wins the election and she's President at the time of the election.
unidentified
Well, yeah, the President of the Senate would oversee, yeah, so the results, in this case, right, it would be the certification, Electoral College would be overseen by the President of the Senate.
And what we're witnessing right now is the attempted takeover of the United States of America for the sake of a globalist elite to conglomerate all political power worldwide and subjugate humanity.
Thank you so much.
Stay tuned for The Alex Jones Show in two minutes.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Please pray for the crew, and I'm so thankful to the crew.
They're doing such a great job.
I'm so thankful to Owen and to Chase and to all the rest of the crew and to Rob Dooher here with me right now.
We were one family together, black, white, old, young, you name it, in the fight for liberty against the New World Order.
Thank you so much for your past support, and I humbly ask for your support now.
You can go to InfoWarsTore.com, where the big Save InfoWars sales are going, with X2 and X3 and DNA Force Plus, Nitric Moose, and all these other incredible game-changing products.
Also, The Great Line.
A dozen products under InfoWarsMD, private-labeled from a top manufacturer in the country.
They said, hey, we'll let you have our whole line, and then we'll ship it for you.
We'll do it all.
It's all dropship.
All our products are selling out.
We're out of money.
But because of InfoWars MD, they are basically unlimited for us, so that now when you buy InfoWars MD, you're getting great, excellent, amazing products that are across the board for your supplement needs, and they then keep us on the air.