Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Over the past few years, illegal immigrants have been given U.S. | ||
bank debit cards from the United Nations. | ||
Reportedly, $1.6 billion. | ||
Does that go into your bank account? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, let me see. | |
I'm standing outside the United Nations office in Tapachula, Mexico. | ||
One of the things that is happening here and all along the migrant trail is that the United Nations is handing out cash And debit cards and rental assistance and movement assistance to immigrants to help sustain them on their road to El Norte. | ||
Catholic charities have been managing the illegal invasion at the southern border, spending millions while profiting billions. | ||
And the local police admit that they are under their direction. | ||
unidentified
|
The officers were all here under the direction of Catholic Charities. | |
Richard Poiso of Chicago reported that these illegals are getting social security cards within four months of crossing the southern border. | ||
unidentified
|
So yesterday, I ran into somebody that I haven't seen in a while. | |
He's been here for about five months in the United States. | ||
Six months, something like that. | ||
And he says, uh, hey, I'm, uh, I'm looking for work. | ||
I said, well, I can't hire you, man. | ||
I'm not I gotta hire like legitimate people or whatever and he was like no no no I'm legitimate now and he's broken English kind of bits and pieces together and he pulls his ID and stuff out of his pocket he says I got social security card now and I got workers ID and permit for working everything all legit Stamps, city stamping, specialized social security envelope. | ||
This dude got on the buses from Texas to Chicago, got in process here in Chicago, found an apartment building within the first week, an efficiency apartment, moved into the apartment building, and then has been working cash jobs under the table for the last four months until recently got his worker's permit. | ||
Now he's working for a roofing company, but they're laid off right now. | ||
They're laid off right now and he's looking for work. | ||
We have people literally trying to do everything. | ||
They've been waiting for years. | ||
They still don't have what this guy has in four months. | ||
That's how fucked up our government is. | ||
That's how much they care about the illegal migrants more than they care about their own people. | ||
The problem is, and this is fucked up for me to say this, some Americans have done this to themselves because they're fucking lazy and they won't get off their ass to go out and actually get the stuff done that they're trying to get done, that they need to be getting done. | ||
Like this guy came here knowing that he could lose his life, lose everything, he gets here, Now he's a worker, within four months done all his paperwork, went to all his appointments and stuff and figured out the system and is hustling. | ||
It's really, really, really messed up that they would do this for people that are not even from this country. | ||
They didn't help build this country, they didn't help contribute to this country, and they just walk right in like they do and just get handed IDs, social security cards, just get them on the payroll and stuff. | ||
Let's just do it for them. | ||
Let's get them set, but not take care of our own people that are on the streets. | ||
It's messed up. | ||
Joe Biden opposes the SAVE Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote for him this November. | ||
Without having to provide proof of citizenship, a social security card and a driver's license will certainly suffice. | ||
Voter fraud may not be necessary if 30 million UN migrants can vote. | ||
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
Folks, that is the latest from Greg Reese. | ||
Illegals getting SSNs within four months of crossing the border. | ||
And we actually have a lot more to cover on that front today. | ||
Several videos showing immigration lawyers talking about how easy it is to get some form of ID from a variety of different states, from Massachusetts to Illinois. | ||
You can just waltz right up, get a driver's license, and that's enough to vote. | ||
So yeah, they're rigging it. | ||
They're rigging America out of existence. | ||
We just keep sounding the alarm. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
We'll do your daily dispatch on the other side. | ||
Illegal immigration and illegal voter fraud is just the tip of the iceberg, folks. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
unidentified
|
It's Thursday, July 11th in the year of our Lord 2024. | |
And you're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
I think it's time to blow this thing. | ||
Get everybody in the stuff together. | ||
Okay, three, two, one, let's jam. | ||
All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
We have a lot to talk about today. | ||
I'm joined by Dan Lyman a little bit later in the show. | ||
Lots of videos to get to. | ||
unidentified
|
Lots of stories to cover. | |
We'll take your calls as well throughout the show today. | ||
I'll probably open up phone lines a little bit early. | ||
Make this whole show a conversation about what comes next. | ||
What comes next and... How do we carry out this goal line defense? | ||
That's really how it feels feels like they are driving home globalism and will soon have everything they need Set in place and You know just like the report we saw in the first five there Greg reason them 30 million immigrants flooding across our border and then being allowed to vote in our elections There's not a lot you can do to | ||
Undo that without drastic overhauls. | ||
We're beyond the time of little patchwork fixes for these things. | ||
We need an overhaul. | ||
And we'll get into what that might look like. | ||
Here in America and overseas. | ||
In places like Europe. | ||
Where yet another thousand year old cathedral is now in flames. | ||
You just add that to the list of incredible historical artifacts and buildings being utterly ruthlessly and purposefully destroyed in the drive to erase European history and eradicate the gains that were made from that continent. | ||
Things like human rights. | ||
We'll get into all of that and more, but let's begin today as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch. | ||
All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Thursday, the 11th of July, 2024. | ||
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signs controversial election recount and fraud bills into law. | ||
Michigan's process of handling election recounts and fraud allegations has changed with Governor Gretchen Whitmer signing two controversial bills into law Monday. | ||
Senate bills 603 and 604 modify the requirements for conducting ballot recounts and prosecuting election-related crimes. | ||
Today, with the signing of our common-sense recount law reforms, we are strengthening our democracy and ensuring that we reach the most accurate count of the ballots possible during a recount process, said sponsor state senator Stephanie Chang, Detroit. | ||
These laws achieve critical goals of protecting the security of every vote, modernizing the recount process, and uplifting the voices of Michigan voters. | ||
Anybody else got a bad feeling in their stomach? | ||
Anybody else understand what this really means? | ||
When you've got a Democrat using sort of vague platitudes to describe a bill, you should be scared. | ||
You should be very scared. | ||
Critical goals of protecting security of every vote, modernizing the recount process, and uplifting the voices of Michigan voters. | ||
Okay. | ||
Anytime you hear somebody like this say they're uplifting the vote, the voices of Michigan voters, just, just, you know, it's probably a bill about climate change. | ||
You know, who knows? | ||
Who knows? | ||
Just if they don't tell you exactly what it's for, assume it's something terrible in reality. | ||
Among other changes, the law will eliminate the board of canvassers investigative powers, instead requiring the board to refer to any allegations of fraud to the relevant county prosecutor rather than conducting a recount. | ||
See, so it makes things harder. | ||
Basically, it makes things harder to confirm. | ||
It makes recounts more difficult. | ||
To pull off. | ||
So that's what they mean, right? | ||
This is just how modern politics works. | ||
When a Democrat says something like, this bill is very important for uplifting unheard voices. | ||
It's like, well, what's the bill actually do? | ||
It makes it easier to cheat in an election. | ||
It actually puts an extra step in between the rigged vote and the recount. | ||
We make it harder and more difficult and more of a bureaucratic hassle to actually confirm the count is accurate. | ||
That's what we call uplifting Michigan voice. | ||
It's just like, just beware. | ||
Just when you hear Democrats speaking in platitudes, understand that something evil is occurring. | ||
Only alleged errors could merit a recount, and only when alleged errors could potentially change election results. | ||
You have to know the effect of and cause of the error before you can investigate it. | ||
Great. | ||
That makes a lot of sense. | ||
It will also increase the deposit for filing a recount petition, modify various guidelines for clerks, and change sentencing guidelines for election law violations. | ||
For years, clerks and candidates have demanded reforms and updates to Michigan's 70-year-old recount law, so every valid ballot can be subject to a recount in close races, said State Senator Jeremy Moss, who co-sponsored the bill with Chang. | ||
This legislation will strengthen the integrity of our voting systems and ensure the accuracy of our election results. | ||
Yes, yes, of course it will. | ||
Of course it will. | ||
Well, Just like the Inflation Reduction Act was a bill about climate change, it just is the opposite. | ||
It's the opposite of what they're saying. | ||
They are weakening the integrity of the voting systems and making it more difficult to achieve accurate, certifiable vote counts. | ||
Why would they do that? | ||
Because they love cheating. | ||
Moving on here. | ||
Spire, a famous French cathedral on fire. | ||
We actually have a couple videos of this. | ||
Clip 1 and 2 and 13 are some videos of this happening. | ||
It is a absolutely huge spire. | ||
Totally jaw-dropping that this was built. | ||
This cathedral began construction In the 11th century, so around year 1000, built for about 200 years, finally completing in I think 1208, something like that. | ||
It was the world's tallest building until 1880. | ||
And it's burning, mysteriously. | ||
Wow, who would have thought? | ||
There was a, there was a image going around. | ||
I didn't grab it today, but it had been going viral ever since the French elections. | ||
Just showing the sheer number of churches that have burned to the ground in France in the last 10 years. | ||
It's like a thousand. | ||
It's like a thousand churches have been burned down. | ||
Because France is going away. | ||
It's being subsumed in the tide of diversity. | ||
It's being destroyed. | ||
We still have never, as far as I know, there's never even been an investigation into the Notre Dame fire, which was, of course, probably arson, almost certainly arson, for that matter. | ||
I remember on the day that was happening, we were watching videos where you could see people walking around up at the top of Notre Dame, starting the fire. | ||
And so, of course, they called that hate speech. | ||
And declared that it was a natural accidental fire before the fire was even out. | ||
Because the media and government of France Is the one destroying it? | ||
Images posted on social media show flames spewing from scaffolding canopy near the top of the building, which is renowned due to its three towers spanning hundreds of years of architecture. | ||
The Gothic Cathedral is widely known as it was painted multiple times by French Impressionist painter Claude Monet in the 19th century. | ||
A fire has started on the spire of Rouen Cathedral. | ||
Original origin unknown at this stage. | ||
All public resources are mobilized, wrote the city's mayor. | ||
On X, the blaze started in a section where buildings works building works were taking place. | ||
Regional officials said the cathedral had been evacuated and emergency services are on site. | ||
And unless I'm wrong, I think Notre Dame also was under construction at the time, which could mean that. | ||
It was right. | ||
It could mean that the. | ||
You know, active. | ||
Doing construction work on these cathedrals is a risky business. | ||
And you know, there's danger of fire there. | ||
Or it could be that while under construction is one of the only times that these locations would be open to interlopers. | ||
It could be either one of those. | ||
Let's be clear. | ||
If they could build this cathedral in the 1200s. | ||
With nothing but iron chisels. | ||
I think 1000 years later we should be able to Do some touch-ups on it without burning it to the ground. | ||
It seems like we would have been able to advance that far. | ||
As to be able to carry out architectural reconstruction without destroying the thing if they actually cared to. | ||
No, it's on purpose. | ||
It's all on purpose. | ||
So likely. | ||
I mean, I don't know this for sure, but if I... | ||
If I was the French government right now, obviously, I would be pouring resources into, you know, guaranteeing the security and safety of the mosques in the area. | ||
Obviously, because you don't want people thinking that Muslims did this and then taking revenge. | ||
And obviously, every time a church gets shot up or burned down, the first response should be to protect the not-churches, the things that aren't churches. | ||
unidentified
|
But that's just me. | |
Meanwhile, the 2020 election, 2024 election campaign is just getting hilarious. | ||
They changed this headline because I wanted the headline that had maybe the funniest term we've heard being used very seriously by Democrats recently, which is that President Biden today will be holding a big boy press conference. | ||
Oh boy. | ||
Democrat party in turmoil ahead of Biden's big boy press conference. | ||
It's happening. | ||
He's putting on his big boy pants. | ||
He's getting all dressed up. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, in order to be a big boy, you kind of do need to be potty trained out of your diapers. | |
I know. | ||
unidentified
|
Or you're not a big boy. | |
It's so funny because it's literally like you have a three year old son, so we're We're done potty training, but we're, like, trying to get him to sleep in his bed without getting up and wandering around. | ||
unidentified
|
So what you're saying is your son is more capable than the president? | |
I'm saying I use the same words. | ||
I use the same arguments. | ||
You know, big boys, big boys, talk to the press, okay? | ||
If you want privileges of a big boy, you gotta prove that you're a big boy. | ||
I say this like four times a day. | ||
Hey, big boys sit and eat their dinner and only big boys get ice cream. | ||
So if you want an ice cream like a big boy, you got to sit and eat your dinner like a big boy. | ||
That's fine. | ||
Look, big boys, big boy presidents hold press conferences, okay? | ||
So if you want to be a big boy and get reelected, you got to go out and prove you can put a sentence together. | ||
Okay, big boy? | ||
They're probably rewarding him with ice cream too. | ||
It's probably exactly... I'm telling you. | ||
I'm telling you. | ||
He's Benjamin Buttoning. | ||
He is reverting to childhood in his older age. | ||
Just insane. | ||
And we'll go over this a lot because it's... It's cacophonous. | ||
It's schizophrenic. | ||
It's just... The Democratic Party right now, they don't know what to do. | ||
They're contradicting themselves. | ||
They're... | ||
Fighting each other. | ||
They cannot win with Biden at the head of the party, but they can't figure out how to get him to go away. | ||
They're really screwed here in a very funny way. | ||
And we'll get into this a little bit later, but yes, his big boy press conference is later today. | ||
And if he makes it all the way through without saying the N word, he gets ice cream. | ||
I don't know if you'd say the N-word, but... That's a big ask. | ||
unidentified
|
That's a big ask. | |
I mean, it's, you know... It's like, what could be more embarrassing? | ||
Again, we are all that World War II veteran behind him, just... Just shocked at what we're seeing here. | ||
Yeah, we got some great videos to go to on that topic a little bit later today as well. | ||
But finally, we have this House Passes SAVE Act that bans non-citizens voting in federal elections. | ||
The House passed the Republican-led Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act by 221 to 198 votes, which requires voters to prove their citizenship in order to vote in federal elections. | ||
Only five House Democrats sided with the Republicans in voting for this bill. | ||
House Speaker Mike Johnson in a statement excoriated the Democrats for voting against the bill, claiming they now have proven that they believe that illegal aliens should be voting in the American elections. | ||
It is the only reason to oppose this bill. | ||
It just makes no sense. | ||
Any other argument? | ||
We could show you some of the arguments that they're making. | ||
They don't make any sense. | ||
It is utter and complete nonsense. | ||
The only reason you would vote against this is if you wanted illegal aliens to vote in the election. | ||
That's it. | ||
That's all. | ||
You know, I understand that things are partisan. | ||
I understand that these things are going to fall by party line most of the time. | ||
I just wish every once in a while, in situations like this, the party That will not shut the hell up about supposed threats to democracy. | ||
Just vote for a little bit of election integrity. | ||
Do something that is just tangibly a threat to democracy. | ||
Do something to fight against the actual threat to democracy, the actual total deconstruction And elimination of democracy, like you're letting foreigners into your country by the tens of millions. | ||
And you have no systems to prevent them from voting in your elections. | ||
And the thing is, I can't remember if I have a video of this. | ||
Might have to pull it in. | ||
But they don't even need illegal aliens to actually vote. | ||
Because they do the vote harvesting. | ||
So they'll just use their name on a ballot. | ||
And vote for them. | ||
So as long as the person is here, they are a democratic vote, like the Democrats will be counting their vote as a democratic vote. | ||
If they're just present in the country, they don't even have to go to the polls. | ||
The Democrats will just vote harvest, meaning print out a ballot with their name on it and send it in with the Democrat check box checked. | ||
So they're doing it. | ||
And again, I get that Democrats and Republicans are like cat and dogs, right? | ||
And we can't get together on anything. | ||
Abortion, obviously, the big difference. | ||
These sorts of things. | ||
Welfare. | ||
Childcare provided by the government. | ||
These things. | ||
There's insurmountable differences. | ||
You would think that maybe, just maybe, voter integrity would be one of the things that we come together on. | ||
And yet again, I'm reminded. | ||
It's like I'm reminded of those good old days. | ||
You remember? | ||
I remember a time Republicans and Democrats put their differences aside, came together to achieve a goal and get Israel all the money they could possibly demand and ban TikTok for daring to allow anti-Israeli commentary on it. | ||
Remember that? | ||
Remember how rapidly, remember how they got deans of universities fired? | ||
Within a week of the event, they were holding sessions where both sides, Democrat and Republican, were at once and finally reunited on the same side. | ||
Brothers in arms, allies in a fight for Israel. | ||
You know, wouldn't it be amazing if they felt that way about America? | ||
Wouldn't that be something? | ||
And that really is the frustrating part. | ||
You've got these votes that it just makes no sense why Democrats wouldn't vote for this if they don't want illegals voting. | ||
They do want illegals voting, that's obvious. | ||
They know the fraud is going on and they're changing laws to facilitate it. | ||
It just couldn't be more obvious. | ||
But I suppose we can all just indulge in a fantasy world in which the Democratic Party, who won't shut up about threats to democracy, And the Republican Party could come together to actually confront a tangible, literal, existential threat to our democracy. | ||
But no. | ||
Five of them, five out of the 206, or however many, decided to vote for democracy. | ||
For secure elections. | ||
But it doesn't matter, because it's going to fail in the Senate, and even if it got through the Senate, it would be vetoed by Biden. | ||
So just really hammering home the fact that the American government is incapable of doing absolutely anything for America. | ||
Just nothing. | ||
Just absolutely nothing. | ||
Now if you're on some sort of 2,000-year-old blood feud in the desert, well, those differences fall away and suddenly they can agree on things. | ||
But not today. | ||
Not today, folks. | ||
And we have this. | ||
U.S. | ||
spies resurrect Russiagate claims. | ||
Russia is attempting to sway the U.S. | ||
presidential election in favor of Donald Trump, intelligence officials have claimed. | ||
Similar allegations by U.S. | ||
spies over the last eight years have proven false. | ||
Yeah, but nothing happened to them. | ||
No, but see, nothing happened to them, though. | ||
So why wouldn't they do it again? | ||
You see the people in our government that were caught in their own words, in their text messages, plotting out a scheme by which they would alter the outcome of the presidential election because they hated Donald Trump. | ||
A quote, insurance plan in which they used Hillary Clinton's fabricated campaign disinformation to launch a full scale Fine tooth comb investigation of everyone Donald Trump had ever spoken to in all of their communications and all of their financial records. | ||
This plot used to undermine and derail the entirety of his administration. | ||
They're still in office. | ||
They're still in power. | ||
Nothing has been done to them. | ||
Not a single one of them was charged with treason and strung up on a scaffold. | ||
They're gonna do it again. | ||
And the media never even acknowledged it. | ||
It's one of the most historical aberrations I've ever seen. | ||
Like, the fact, this weird Twilight Zone amnesia that America went through. | ||
Where for four years straight, every single day was another claim about Russiagate, was another update, was another the wall's closing in story about Donald Trump. | ||
The entire thing falls apart and then it's like it never happened. | ||
It's like they just forgot those four years. | ||
It's like the Twilight Zone, where the people go, you know, the people disappear. | ||
Guys running around going, where's Bob? | ||
And people are going, Bob? | ||
I've never heard of Bob. | ||
I've never met anyone named Bob. | ||
They're like, it's your son, Bob! | ||
No, I would remember having a son. | ||
It's just like, what is happening here? | ||
What is going on? | ||
They're doing the Russiagate hoax again? | ||
Yeah, this just in, folks. | ||
Two towers just flew into the World Trade Center and we're going to war with Iraq over weapons of mass destruction. | ||
Yeah, it's 2024 and we're just doing it all over again. | ||
All of the lies. | ||
All of the treason. | ||
All of the just blatant violations of every constitutional right of our entire political system. | ||
It all went totally unpunished. | ||
It all continued. | ||
Unrestricted, and so now they're launching it again. | ||
unidentified
|
The Twilight Zone, folks. | |
Oh yeah With Harrison Smith Oh yeah American Journal Oh yeah With Harrison Smith Oh yeah Suited up It's on. | ||
The American Journal. | ||
Harrison Smith sees through the fight With spectacles holding his vision tight Harrison see through this night American Journal, oh yeah With Harrison Smith, oh yeah The American Journal Shout out to Matt Baker for this theme song for us He's got the headlines sharp and bright I can only imagine the work that went into that | ||
Writing the song, playing all the instruments, setting up the recording. | ||
He wouldn't just do something with AI, would he? | ||
It's really amazing what AI is capable of these days. | ||
So yeah, shout out to Matt Baker for sending that to me at 4.30 in the morning this morning. | ||
I don't know if he was up late or early, but it's inhuman. | ||
It's an inhuman time to be alive. | ||
Oh, that's right, it's only 2.30 for him. | ||
I forget, he's in California. | ||
At slave underscore two underscore liberty on X. So we got lots of videos to go to here. | ||
Before we do, a special, a special announcement, a congratulations are in order. | ||
Puma Abedin and Alexander Soros are engaged. | ||
They posted their engagement, uh, photos here on some, uh, Italian villa. | ||
Alexander Soros. | ||
Got a little bit of scoliosis going, but that's okay. | ||
He's a little hunchbacked, but that's all right. | ||
So congratulations to the, uh, former wife of Anthony Weiner. | ||
And the son of demon George Soros, a match made in hell. | ||
I think we can all appreciate the fact that no matter how bad things get, no matter how difficult life becomes, no matter how unpleasant the modern American world is, we can all rest easy knowing that none of us are Huma Abedin or Alexander Soros. | ||
We can all thank God that when we look in the mirror, those faces are not looking back at us. | ||
Can you imagine? | ||
Oh, they suck. | ||
Oh, they just suck so bad. | ||
It's fun to fight them in this information war. | ||
unidentified
|
Where should we start? | |
Where to begin? | ||
I thought I have a little longer than, uh, a little longer video to go to here, but I may have forgotten to put it in. | ||
Because there was testimony. | ||
Okay. | ||
Well, no, not clip 14. | ||
All right. | ||
I got to put, I got to pull in, uh, this video testimony that I was going to go to here, but don't see on the list. | ||
So we'll go to some other videos instead. | ||
We do a lot and of course one of the biggest stories right now is the fact, and this is sort of how to picture it. | ||
One of the biggest stories right now is the SAVE Act and trying to ban illegals from voting in the election and laws being passed. | ||
In some cases to make it more difficult to cheat in elections, in some cases making it easier to cheat in elections. | ||
The real way to imagine this, the real way to see this is what's happening right now is that the Democrats are feverishly putting in place all of the measures they need to cheat without consequence. | ||
That's what's happening right now. | ||
There's some pushback on this by the Republicans, but that's not the driving force. | ||
The driving force is the Democrats rigging the election in front of all of us. | ||
Putting in place the laws and rules and regulations and, you know, the fine print on the election law that will allow them to cheat in a way that is impossible to prove or disprove. | ||
As we pointed out, this is how Elon Musk characterized it earlier this week, but it's been what we've been saying here since literally 2020. | ||
And even before. | ||
How the mail-in ballot system, the ballot harvesting, and the lack of voter ID, and the provisional ballots, and the rigging of the election count in the middle of the night. | ||
These things have been set up deliberately to make it impossible to determine whether or not the vote is valid. | ||
Example, or the illustration I always use, just like votes have a chain of custody, evidence has a chain of custody. | ||
And so if you wanted to rig a trial, you would disturb and disrupt and make impossible to verify the chain of custody. | ||
So instead of, you know, a DNA sample, Being collected by a lab technician here where he signed it and certified it and sealed it in a you know a tamper proof container and then sent it to the lab who certified that they received it unopened and they did and it's just like it's for sure okay this is definitely the blood it's definitely from the crime scene it was definitely tested correctly you have all of this certified and every body from every step of the way goes into court to testify yes this is my work yes I'm the one that did this here's my | ||
You know, uh, certifications on being able to do all of this. | ||
What if you just got rid of all of that? | ||
What if you could just present evidence in a court and not have to prove where it came from and not have to prove anything about it? | ||
Could you ever trust a decision ever again? | ||
Would you be okay being convicted or having You know, somebody victimized you, exonerated in a proceeding for which there was no evidentiary control, for which there was no chain of custody for any of the evidence permitted, presented to the case. | ||
It's like you could come to a conclusion. | ||
The jury could render a verdict. | ||
There's no way of knowing whether it's accurate or not because there's no way of verifying the evidence. | ||
There's no way of verifying the vote count. | ||
That is what they're setting up. | ||
So as we speak, the Democrats are systematically and feverishly putting in place all of these measures that make it impossible to verify, certify, or decertify the electoral results. | ||
The Michigan example is the most blatant in recent memory. | ||
Where they have all these rules for conducting a recount. | ||
Now they're going in and they're changing these rules to make it more difficult to get a recount. | ||
And that's it. | ||
That's what they do. | ||
That's what these laws do. | ||
There's no other reason to have them. | ||
And they're setting it up in a way that, to me, makes it seem impossible to Ever get a recount. | ||
Only alleged errors could merit a recount, and only when the alleged errors could potentially change the election results. | ||
So how could you possibly know that? | ||
First of all, how could you know what's an error and what's not? | ||
And if you could determine that something was an error rather than... I don't even get this. | ||
Only alleged errors could merit a recount. | ||
So typically, recounts will be automatically instigated if the vote is just too close. | ||
You know, you just, if it's only within like 100 or so votes, like, all right, well, we better count these again and make sure we got all of them. | ||
Make sure we got everything right. | ||
This is, this is a very narrow victory. | ||
We've got to make sure, you know, the winner takes it. | ||
But not anymore, I guess. | ||
Now you have to prove that there was an error of some sort. | ||
You have to allege a specific error and that error has to be enough to change the election results. | ||
Which seems like an impossible bar to clear. | ||
That seems like a totally unreasonable requirement to get a recount. | ||
And of course the question you should be asking is why wouldn't they want to, like what is the damage of a recount? | ||
Just like what is the threat of requiring photo ID? | ||
What problem are they trying to solve? | ||
Is it a problem? | ||
Are there too many recounts? | ||
unidentified
|
It's like a 400-year-old problem. | |
It's racism. | ||
Oh, that's right. | ||
No, it's probably racism. | ||
No, I forgot. | ||
They are, quote, uplifting the voices of Michigan voters. | ||
Sorry, that's what they're doing. | ||
They're uplifting, by which they mean abolishing, Michigan voters' voices, by which they mean certifiable and verifiable elections. | ||
They use different words, but that's what they mean. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
So the problem with dealing with the Democrats of today... I haven't liked making it a Democrat-Republican thing because, like, we know there's the unit party. | ||
But it's the Democrats doing this. | ||
It's the Democrats that are always doing this. | ||
And it goes to, like, the moral foundation of the belief system. | ||
And so we're sort of screwed by our own morality here, because, and we've used the illustration before, like if you're playing a game with somebody, and they're cheating, either you have to quit playing the game, or you have to cheat also, or you lose. | ||
Now unfortunately for us, the game that we're playing here is The fate of our nation. | ||
It's the electoral process of the United States and who will be in control of its future. | ||
So we can't not play. | ||
We have to play. | ||
And whoever wins, wins. | ||
Wins history. | ||
Wins the future. | ||
But they're cheating. | ||
So it's like we're sitting at a Monopoly table and the Democrats are just Grabbing bills out of the bank whenever they need it. | ||
They're just cheating. | ||
And we don't like cheating. | ||
Like we just don't, it's not something that we do. | ||
And also we know that the way the justice system is rigged at this point, it's not even a possibility. | ||
It's not like we can just do what the Democrats do and also get away with it. | ||
Because they understand exactly what they're doing. | ||
And if they see Republicans do it, then they'll be out there, you know, crying crocodile tears about the sanctity of our democracy and how dare the Republicans violate our voting system like this. | ||
It's, it's very frustrating. | ||
It's very frustrating. | ||
So they're just rigging it. | ||
They're just cheating. | ||
It's not really that complicated. | ||
It's not even really that devious. | ||
They're just doing it, and they're doing it in a variety of different ways. | ||
Puts us in a difficult position. | ||
Because we're not, we don't like cheating and we're not as good at cheating as cheating, at cheating as them. | ||
So, like they do the ballot harvesting crap. | ||
That's not as much an option for Republicans. | ||
See, Democrats have entire demographic groups that vote for them 95 plus percent of the time. | ||
That all live in metropolitan high density areas, very certain geographic locations. | ||
So the Democrats can very easily run the numbers, parse the data and go, all right, this neighborhood in this city, they vote 95% Republican. | ||
And so we just send in 50 volunteers to go door to door and ballot harvest. | ||
And that's X amount of votes for us and they just they can do that. | ||
Republicans don't really have that type of demographic loyalty in any regard. | ||
And those that those demographics that do reliably vote Republican don't live in big city neighborhoods densely packed. | ||
It's a bit of a different You know, game getting 50 Republican votes from farms that are four miles between each one and getting 50 Democrat votes in one apartment block in one city. | ||
So the whole system is set up to facilitate their rigging. | ||
And they're making it easier for them to do it as the story that we're covering. | ||
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer signs controversial election recount fraud bills into law. | ||
Watering down protections is counterproductive when several red flags have arisen within the state's election process. | ||
Opponents say eliminating the canvasser's investigatory powers and scrapping protections against election worker interference will make fraud more difficult to address and compromise election security. | ||
Yeah, duh, that's the point, right? | ||
That's why they're doing it. | ||
They wouldn't do it if it didn't make it easier to cheat. | ||
And it's not just the election system that they're rigging. | ||
They are, of course, simultaneously using the judicial system to go after their opponents. | ||
Let's go now to clip number nine. | ||
Here's Representative Russell Fry from South Carolina talking about the way the government has been weaponized against Republicans in a variety of different ways. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Gentleman from South Carolina is recognized. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | |
You know, it's been a bad week for Democrats. | ||
Not only is the border wide open, not only does Main Street feel the pressure of 20% inflation, but we saw a pretty tragic debate performance by the Commander-in-Chief. | ||
In fact, Democrats this week are discovering new tunnels on the way to and from the Capitol in which to hide from the media And so they are now talking about things like Project 2025 and things to distract the American people from what they're really seeing, which is a country that is not doing well under his leadership. | ||
It is a total distraction. | ||
Let's recap some of the main players we have here today. | ||
Alvin Bragg used a novel legal theory to bootstrap a misdemeanor allegation as a felony by alleging that records were falsified to conceal a second crime. | ||
Alvin Bragg is a pioneer of sorts, but in all the wrong ways. | ||
When you look at what he's done, he's paved the way for rogue district attorneys to campaign on and get elected to prosecute politically—political enemies or political opponents. | ||
Then we have Judge Murshan, who's a top Democrat donor. | ||
His daughter worked for Kamala Harris and even urged a Trump Organization CFO to be a government witness against President Trump. | ||
But when President Trump requested he recuse himself, Judge Murshan said no. | ||
He performed an examination of his own conscience, which he found that he can rule fairly, and that it would not be in the public interest if he recused himself from the case. | ||
A total farce. | ||
The left has really stacked the deck on this trial. | ||
Judge Wilson, why should Judge Mershawn—we talked about this a second, but we're going to wrap up here—why should Judge Mershawn have recused himself from hearing the case against President Trump? | ||
A judge has an obligation to be fair and impartial and to appear fair and impartial. | ||
Now Judge Machon has the right to rely upon the ethics opinions that he received. | ||
He asked a question, he got the answer. | ||
But that isn't the end of the analysis. | ||
The judge has to also avoid the appearance of impropriety. | ||
In hearing the case, After having made political contributions and having a daughter, first degree relationship to the judge, profiting from Attacking the subject of the trial that the judge is presiding over has the appearance of impropriety. | ||
Judge, have you ever asked, have you ever asked specifically a potential witness to be a witness in a case, or have you let the prosecutors and the defense counsel pick their own set of witnesses? | ||
I leave that to the prosecution and the defense. | ||
The prosecution is the burden of proof. | ||
They decide what witnesses they want to put forward to prove their case, and the defense then has the ability to present whatever witnesses they want. | ||
Sometimes witnesses will be irrelevant, cumulative, there'll be other reasons they'll not testify, but in general the prosecution and defense are the ones that pick the witnesses. | ||
So if a judge were to do that, in this case Judge Marchand, to ask a former Trump CFO to be a witness in a case, that would be improper, is that correct? | ||
That's out of the ordinary. | ||
It's not always improper for a judge to suggest a witness, but judges don't call witnesses in 99.99% of cases. | ||
Judge, You talked about this earlier, kind of a parade of errors. | ||
What was the legal term that you used? | ||
Cumulative. | ||
These are cumulative errors. | ||
So would the inability of Judge Marchand to recuse himself, would that be part of a stack that could be used by a court of appeals to reverse the decision? | ||
I believe so. | ||
What other grounds for appeal do you think are evident from your mind on this particular case? | ||
Well, I go right back to the indictment and Appellate courts like to rule on things that are pretty clear. | ||
A clear error is usually the basis that an appellate court will find and not go into a lot of other questionable issues. | ||
Courts like to decide things simply in most cases. | ||
Here the indictment was facially insufficient right from the beginning. | ||
And it would have been a simple matter for Judge Marchand to dismiss that indictment and to give the prosecutor leave to represent that indictment to get a sufficient one, to give the defendant proper notice of the charges that the defendant was facing. | ||
That was not done in this case, and that led directly to the next significant error, which was not notifying the defendant of those additional charges until he was already at trial, And many of them not being notified, many of those charges not being present until the jury instructions themselves. | ||
And then the jury instructions, of course, were wrong, too. | ||
I mean, it was a 55-page set of jury instructions that were incredibly confusing to an average juror. | ||
Yes, as well as to lawyers, for that matter, because I heard that comment more than once that many didn't know what those jury instructions meant. | ||
Thank you, Judge. | ||
Appreciate your time. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
Second hour is on. | ||
Go ahead and take your calls in this hour. | ||
I'll open up the phone lines right now. | ||
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
Democrats are frantically trying to pre-rig the election, get everything in place so that their voter fraud can be pulled off without interference from pesky things like laws. | ||
Guidelines. | ||
Anti-cheating measures. | ||
But simultaneously, they are absolutely melting down. | ||
Internally. | ||
Just totally collapsing. | ||
In a really amazingly embarrassing way, to be frank with you. | ||
This story is from InfoWars. | ||
Democratic rep melts down when asked about Biden's fitness. | ||
Says it's like asking, do you beat your wife? | ||
Which is really something. | ||
We'll go now to clip number four. | ||
This is Deborah Dingle. | ||
Let's listen to old Dingleberry. | ||
unidentified
|
I do just want to ask you again if you think President Biden is the strongest person at the top of the ticket to win Michigan in the fall. | |
He's the candidate right now, and these are do-you-beat-your-wife kind of questions. | ||
You know, who is the strongest? | ||
Everybody said Hillary Clinton's the strongest candidate. | ||
She's going to win, and I told you all in 2015-2016 Donald Trump was going to win. | ||
I loved Hillary, but she wasn't the strongest candidate. | ||
What we got to do is go out and talk the issues. | ||
And we got to make sure we talk about what Joe Biden's accomplished, what the vision is, what Democrats stand for. | ||
That what I mean. | ||
Oof. | ||
Pooh boy! | ||
Yeah, that's not somebody who's confident in their party, let's just say that. | ||
unidentified
|
And that really wasn't a gotcha, like, like, loaded... That wasn't even a loaded beat-your-wife question. | |
Right. | ||
Like, how can you not know that this question is coming? | ||
I mean, this is what the entire media has been in uproar about for over a week. | ||
unidentified
|
It's a very fundamental question. | |
Like, is he fit to even serve? | ||
She's just like, blah, blah, blah. | ||
People said Hillary Clinton was fit, but she didn't do 215. | ||
I told you that you're trouble. | ||
It's like, whoa, calm down, lady. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's not talk about his mental fitness right now. | |
Let's talk about what he did last year. | ||
Yeah. | ||
No, but. | ||
You know, it's. | ||
They're liars, but they're not even that good of liars, but like, this is what liars do, right? | ||
You ask somebody a question, you know, maybe bring up something they thought they got away with. | ||
This is the type of response you get. | ||
Well, I mean, sure. | ||
But I mean, if we talk about this other thing, though, but what about this other thing that I'm more comfortable talking about than the thing you just brought up? | ||
Let's just I mean, you could say that. | ||
Sure. | ||
But I mean, let's do it. | ||
It's like, oh, OK. | ||
All right. | ||
Calm down. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
Watch to watch those people just discuss like the calculus of power. | ||
Right. | ||
Is just kind of gross. | ||
Yeah. | ||
But what it, you know, what it represents is like, yeah, they know he sucks. | ||
They know he's terrible. | ||
But they can't say that. | ||
But they can't think of any reason, they can't think of anything else to say. | ||
They have nothing. | ||
They just have absolutely nothing. | ||
It is utterly pathetic. | ||
And I don't know, this might be, this might be kind of a tangential thing. | ||
But it sort of reminds me of this other video that got posted yesterday. | ||
It's Mick Jagger. | ||
Praising Trudeau and being shocked at the fact that he's booed in return by his Canadian crowd. | ||
Let's watch Mick Jagger in Canada last night. | ||
unidentified
|
I mean, we love your Mr. Trudeau. | |
I mean, his family's always been such big fans of our fans. | ||
And they boo, and look at his face. | ||
He has no idea. | ||
He has no idea, and then he's like, but your soccer team's doing good. | ||
You'll cheer for that, right? | ||
Yeah, good job. | ||
Get the crowd back on your side. | ||
Very rapid turnaround. | ||
Look at that face. | ||
This is Trudeau rambling. | ||
We can bring it down. | ||
It's like these people are so out of touch. | ||
They have no idea what's actually going on. | ||
They're struggling to justify any of their positions. | ||
And everybody hates them. | ||
They're getting desperate. | ||
They're cheating. | ||
They're having to cheat to win. | ||
The entire facade of globalism is utterly collapsing. | ||
All of their fake, propped-up leaders are despised. | ||
And they're at the end of their rope. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
The rig is on. | ||
About to your phone calls this hour. | ||
Still some lines open. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
I just put in a new video. | ||
A little compilation that's posted by a clandestine at war clandestine on X. Obviously the Democrats are rigging things. | ||
They are. | ||
They don't even have to cheat. | ||
They don't even have to commit voter fraud like they did in 2020 if they just get enough illegal migrant names on the rolls and ballot harvest on their behalf. | ||
Their passing law is making it more difficult to get a recount, setting the bar higher before any action is taken. | ||
And they're simultaneously frantic and freaking out about Just what an abysmal failure Biden has been and continues to be. | ||
And these things are obviously closely related. | ||
They know they can't win without cheating. | ||
They're very aware that they are screwed. | ||
Because their ideas are bad and their governance is painful. | ||
And their candidate is an unmitigated disaster. | ||
So they know all of this. | ||
So they're gearing things up to cheat. | ||
And one thing that you see time and time again with Democrats is when you try to outlaw something that they're doing, they get very mad and tell you nobody's doing that, which is a bit non-logical, a bit inconsistent, illogical. | ||
I mean, let's just, uh, Think about this for a second. | ||
It's things like transgender surgery for children. | ||
And we know they're doing it because they talk about doing it. | ||
Because the hospitals that perform these surgeries will brag about it, make videos where they're like, the youngest one I performed was 11 years old. | ||
And you're like, you're performing transgender surgery on 11 year olds? | ||
And they're like, no, what do you mean? | ||
No, never. | ||
Well, you did brag about that. | ||
And you are still doing it, like the whistleblower from Texas Children's. | ||
They said they weren't doing it, but they were, and now the person who exposed them doing it is facing criminal charges. | ||
And when you try to pass a law saying let's not perform genital mutilation on children because they've been brainwashed into a mental illness, they get very mad and tell you nobody's doing that, so we don't need a law. | ||
Well, if nobody's doing that, then what's the problem with the law? | ||
If anything, this should deserve like a shrug, right? | ||
You know, so if somebody tried banning, you know, uh, whatever, unpowered flight, it's like, well, nobody can fly, so it doesn't, you go ahead and ban it. | ||
Yeah, go ahead and ban people flying around like Superman. | ||
You can ban that because it doesn't exist. | ||
So who cares, right? | ||
If anything, you should just be like, well, all right, that doesn't exist. | ||
If you want to ban it, that's fine, but it's not going to do anything. | ||
It's not a shrug, it's not a rolling of the eyes, it's a fury that comes from the Democrats. | ||
Because they are doing these things, and they're mad that you're trying to make it illegal. | ||
And they understand how bad it is, because they pretend it's not happening. | ||
You don't pretend something's not happening if it's not terrible, right? | ||
If you actually believe that transgender surgeries for kids were good, When I say, hey, these people are performing transgender surgeries for kids, you wouldn't say, no, they're not. | ||
Shut up, liar. | ||
No, that's not happening. | ||
That's disinformation. | ||
No, you'd say, yeah, they are. | ||
And that's good. | ||
You would if you believed in it. | ||
But they don't believe in it. | ||
They understand what they're doing is evil. | ||
They understand what they're doing is wrong. | ||
They understand that they're cheating to win the election, and they understand that laws put in place to prevent non-citizens from voting would seriously disrupt their plans to rig the election for the person that they don't even like. | ||
That's how messed up they are. | ||
They don't even like Joe Biden, but they're willing to burn the Constitution to get him elected. | ||
That is the poison of the love of power. | ||
So let's go now to this compilation from WarClandestine. | ||
Here are the reasons that Democrats say they oppose the SAVE Act. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Only citizens can vote for the United States Senate. | ||
Only citizens can vote for the presidency of the United States. | ||
So this extreme Republican voter suppression bill is not designed to solve any problem on behalf of the American people. | ||
It is designed to jam people up and prevent Americans from voting. | ||
unidentified
|
Republicans want to throw up barriers because when people vote, they lose. | |
Let me be clear. | ||
They don't want you to vote. | ||
They don't want to hear black voices, brown voices, LGBTQIA voices, young voices. | ||
Our fundamental access to our democracy is being politicized. | ||
And this xenophobic attack that we're debating today will make it harder for Americans to vote. | ||
My Republican colleagues will claim that requiring IDs is a small ask, but nearly 30 million people lack a valid driver's license. | ||
And about 15 to 18 million adults don't have access to documents proving their birth or citizenship. | ||
Americans don't need more obstacles. | ||
It's already hard enough. | ||
This bill is essentially a poll tax. | ||
Because I am not aware of a single proof of citizenship document that does not cost an individual money to get it. | ||
Unless we are requiring every state to provide one for free and then it's an unfunded mandate. | ||
This is the 2024 version of the Jim Crow poll tax and we should vote against it. | ||
Mr. Speaker, House Republican so-called SAVE Act is a dangerous anti-democratic bill that has no place on this floor. | ||
If we believe in the power of democracy, we should reject discriminatory rules rooted in fear and division, and instead increase protections and expand access. | ||
This bill, they call it the SAVE Act. | ||
It should be called the Don't Let Americans Act. | ||
Don't Let Americans Vote Act. | ||
And so I rise here opposing and asking my colleagues to vote no on this bill. | ||
I yield. | ||
Can't say I'm surprised. | ||
It's not like they have any other actual arguments. | ||
So obviously, saying, hey, only Americans should vote in American elections is, as Jeffrey's put it, an extreme MAGA Republican voter suppression bill. | ||
An extreme MAGA Republican voter suppression bill. | ||
That's what we talk about practically every day at this point. | ||
They have no actual arguments, because what they're doing is not good for anybody. | ||
So all they can possibly do is try desperately to frame this as racist, knowing that enough American people have been trained in a Pavlovian response to believe this sort of crap. | ||
unidentified
|
Which is what's really frustrating about it. | |
I mean, it's gotta be fun being a Democrat. | ||
You don't have to come, you don't have to have a reason for anything. | ||
You can just come up with whatever you want, it can be the worst idea ever, and you just say, well, to oppose me is racist. | ||
And you get votes, and people vote for you, and people fall for it. | ||
It's... sad, honestly. | ||
It is honestly just sad to me. | ||
Call it xenophobic, a poll tax. | ||
This is Jim Crow 2.0. | ||
To ask you to present an ID when you're voting. | ||
Jim Crow 2.0. | ||
I mean, it's practically another Holocaust. | ||
It's like they're putting black people in chains again. | ||
They're trying to bring back slavery. | ||
That's what this is really about. | ||
I mean, is anybody falling for this? | ||
Are people not insulted by this lack of respect that they have for you, thinking that you're stupid enough to fall for this every single time, in every single topic? | ||
She's talking about LGBTQ youth? | ||
Like, what the hell is she talking about? | ||
Republicans are like, hey, we don't want illegal immigrants to vote. | ||
Democrats are just like, won't somebody please think of the gay children? | ||
The hell are you talking about? | ||
What are they talking about? | ||
It's complete, utter, ridiculous nonsense. | ||
Constantly. | ||
It's just constant nonsense from these people. | ||
How are we supposed to get anything done? | ||
How is anything supposed to... Are we supposed to trust anything when these people are in charge of anything? | ||
I mean, it's... It's gotta end. | ||
And the funny part is... Like, it's... | ||
Like all of the Democrats are just on this knife's edge, just like super high tension, about to snap at any moment. | ||
All of them. | ||
We saw the lady just a second ago, right? | ||
What do you say about Biden's fitness? | ||
Oh, well, how dare you ask me that? | ||
It's like a do you beat your wife question. | ||
It's like, okay, calm down, lady. | ||
Can't imagine that question was unexpected. | ||
So what the hell are you freaking out about? | ||
Nancy Pelosi did the same thing. | ||
Clip number 12 here. | ||
Reporter asking Nancy Pelosi a question in the hallway? | ||
She doesn't like that. | ||
that. | ||
unidentified
|
fate of our nation, okay? | |
Whether or not he can win in November? | ||
I think he can win in November. | ||
Do you believe he should run for re-election? | ||
I'm not. | ||
Am I speaking English to you? | ||
I'm not going to be making any statements about any of that right now in the hallway. | ||
In a hallway? | ||
In a hallway? | ||
How dare you? | ||
Questions are for rooms, not hallways. | ||
This is a- Do you realize we're in a hallway right now and you're asking me a question? | ||
How dare you? | ||
It's like, what are you talking about, lady? | ||
What are you talking about? | ||
Answer the question. | ||
In a hallway, really? | ||
As if she's being like in a bad- You know, that would make sense if it was like- In the bathroom stall? | ||
Really? | ||
You're going to interrupt me while I'm sitting on the toilet to badger me about quit? | ||
No, you're in a hallway, lady. | ||
It's where business gets done. | ||
It's where people talk to each other. | ||
It's a hallway. | ||
It's just calm down. | ||
But this is the point, right? | ||
That they just can't handle it. | ||
They just can't handle this. | ||
They can't handle their lives being exposed. | ||
Say it again. | ||
Nothing changed. | ||
Other than the perception. | ||
He didn't get dementia on Wednesday of last week. | ||
He didn't get dementia the few minutes during the debate and the rest of the time he's fine. | ||
He's been this way for years. | ||
They were perfectly happy going along with the dementia ridden incompetent old coot as president. | ||
But now that it's been exposed, now they're having to actually deal with wider public awareness of this. | ||
They cannot handle it. | ||
And they are flipping out in very embarrassing ways. | ||
Am I speaking English to you? | ||
Again, it's just like plastered on smile, just like, with all due respect, I'm not answering your question right now. | ||
I'm not answering that question. | ||
Am I speaking English? | ||
Do you understand me when I say I'm not answering this question? | ||
Just without exception, everybody in power on the Democratic side It's just a boiling pot of hatred and vindictiveness and dismissiveness and superiority. | ||
And it's under just the thinnest sheen of congeniality. | ||
Just the thinnest little smile. | ||
But the instant you do something that's just a little bit annoying to them, the knives come out, the fangs emerge. | ||
Their demonic nature reveals itself. | ||
Donald Trump did an extended post about this whole conundrum. | ||
Talking about George Clooney, who's called for Biden to step down less than a week after holding a $30 million fundraiser for him. | ||
Donald Trump says, so now fake movie actor George Clooney, who never came close to making a great movie, is getting into the act. | ||
He's turned on Crooked Joe like the rats they both are. | ||
What does Clooney know about anything? | ||
He uses Democratic talking point that Biden, the worst president in our history, has saved our democracy. | ||
No, Crooked Joe was the one who weaponized law enforcement against his political opponents, who created the most devastating inflation in the history of our country, who embarrassed our nation Burn. | ||
Absolute third-degree burn. | ||
and whose crazy open border policy has allowed millions of people to illegally pour into our country, many from prisons and mental institutions. | ||
Crooked Joe Biden didn't save our democracy. | ||
He brought our democracy to its knees. | ||
Clooney should get out of politics and go back to television. | ||
Movies never really worked for him. | ||
unidentified
|
Burn. | |
Absolute third-degree burn. | ||
Schumer, meanwhile, opened to dumping Biden on 2024 Democratic ticket. | ||
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is privately signaling to donors he's open to a Democratic presidential ticket that isn't led by President Biden. | ||
Axios has learned. | ||
Over the last 12 days, Schumer has been listening to donors' ideas and suggestions about the best way forward for the party, according to three people familiar with the matter. | ||
He said he supports President Biden. | ||
He has not indicated who, if anyone, would make a more viable candidate than Biden because it doesn't exist. | ||
No, the best hope for you people is the decrepit old skeleton and just hoping, just desperately wishing that he survives until election day. | ||
But they don't care about whether he's actually fit for the office. | ||
They want power. | ||
And that's what they see as the most convenient path. | ||
Two power. | ||
With that, we go out to calls. | ||
Alex from Australia has called in. | ||
G'day, Alex. | ||
Thanks for calling in on Line 6. | ||
You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
G'day, Harrison. | |
G'day, Harrison. | ||
How are you? | ||
Very good, thank you. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, I'd like to bring to light more of a problem that's been going on for many decades. | |
Critical issue. | ||
I know it's been going on globally, but I'm well versed in Australia. | ||
It's a growing number of discontent of men who find themselves at severe disadvantage due to systemic biases in the apprehended violence restraining orders, you might call them domestic violence orders, and magistrates court and subsequent ending up in the family court system. | ||
Now we know George Soros through Gloria Steinem back in the 50s and 60s, back to the feminist movement, as we were the first target in this agenda to remove men from the families. | ||
And there's been a rise up lately. | ||
There's galvanized large community of men who are demanding change and justice. | ||
Usually the first step is the woman applies for the magistrate's order with a summary judgment seen to quickly without any evidence and then the police involvement as a matter of an intimidation tactic in a civil matter are used to intimidate the man serving them an order locking them out of their house from their children It then goes to the Magistrate's Court, which is another summary judgment. | ||
Little evidence is given and it results in men being locked out of the house, separated from the children, while the mother retains custody of the property. | ||
The immediate and severe consequences of the domestic violence order creates significant imbalance. | ||
By the time it's family court, it's often two years down the track the man has not seen his children, he has no access to his home or his assets, and by the time two years comes around, it's barely any visitation rights. | ||
This is very prevalent in Australia. | ||
The suicide rate, we're looking at 8 to 10 men are suiciding daily over this. | ||
Emotional distress, financial ruin, suicide rates. | ||
We need urgent systemic reform and highlight. | ||
They came for the men first and they want to emasculate the men, remove them from the family unit and encouraging social welfare for single mothers. | ||
This is the plight that's been going on for many years now. | ||
Very recently we've had, I don't know if you've heard about it, but the Ministers for Men's Behavioural Change in Australia. | ||
A few weeks ago the media behested the government. | ||
They put a fear campaign about domestic violence. | ||
They've been raising and raising the toxic masculinity of men and we need to do something about it. | ||
Well here's the solution. | ||
Create the problem, impose the solution. | ||
The Hegelian dielectric. | ||
Once again the Victorian government Wow. | ||
Powerful stuff, Alex. | ||
I completely agree with you. | ||
We've got a headline here. | ||
nationally. | ||
They'll be able to pass laws that allow them to lock up men they deem a threat without any evidence. | ||
They'll create threats, convince citizens to dog men in. | ||
It's all part of the biggest strategy to reduce the masculine resistance of what's coming. | ||
Wow. | ||
Powerful stuff, Alex. | ||
I completely agree with you. | ||
We've got a headline here. | ||
Australia is banning entry to anyone found guilty of domestic violence anywhere in the world. | ||
And, you know, there's so much to say about this. | ||
And, And honestly, I was just enjoying your breakdowns. | ||
This isn't something that I've looked into very much. | ||
Obviously, I'm aware of the way that men are disadvantaged in family courts in a variety of different ways. | ||
And it's strange because it's... | ||
I mean, it's not unexpected, right? | ||
It's the hypocrisy of so-called equality where they want, you know, all the privileges of men, but then when you go to, you know, family court, men are still at massive disadvantage and nobody cares and nobody's concerned and nobody's doing anything about it. | ||
They want to have their cake and eat it too. | ||
What do you think would be a solution to this? | ||
Because on the other hand, I don't know. | ||
I think You know there's got to be some way for women to protect themselves from men because it's like we we do want to acknowledge the fact that like men can be intimidating to women and can abuse women and women are weaker than men like this is an acknowledged thing that's reflected in our courts. | ||
I don't I don't know exactly what the right response to this is. | ||
So what would you what would you suggest as part of the reforms Alex? | ||
unidentified
|
A piece of civil paper will really stop a perpetrator who is willing to commit violence on a woman? | |
A paper? | ||
That's not going to stop them. | ||
This is an agenda to remove men from the families. | ||
Right. | ||
Without evidence. | ||
And it is, look, more awareness, the high suicide rate, a lot of good men who have been falsely accused and blamed and also run down by the system. | ||
These are summary judgements. | ||
There's no evidence, there's no evidentiary base. | ||
And a piece of paper is not going to stop a man who's helping and harming a woman. | ||
So really what they brought the system up for was to protect the women by imbalance to men. | ||
But it is harming both of us now. | ||
And you know, the single mother, you look at the children. | ||
It's the number one indicator for failure later in life is whether you have both parents in the home, but particularly a father in the home. | ||
No, you're exactly right. | ||
It's about destroying masculinity. | ||
It's the number one indicator for like failure later in life is whether you have a two both parents in the home, but particularly a father in the home. | ||
No, you're exactly right. | ||
It's about destroying masculinity. | ||
It's about weakening men, abusing men mentally. | ||
And this is the thing. | ||
And this is the thing. | ||
Men are not wired like women. | ||
Men are not wired like women. | ||
And it's, you know, some of the people have seen as obvious in the education system for a long time, that little girls are much more willing to like sit at a desk and behave and, you know, color and be a nice little student where the boys just want to go out and wrestle and fight each other and, you know, do all these things. | ||
And it's, you know, some of the people have seen is obvious in the education system for a long time that little girls are much more willing to like sit at a desk and behave and, you know, color and be a nice little student where the boys just want to go out and wrestle and fight each other and, you know, do all these things. | ||
And it's not that's not bad. | ||
And it's not that's not bad. | ||
That's not a bad thing. | ||
That's not a bad thing. | ||
That's not, you know, boys being built wrong. | ||
That's not, you know, boys being built wrong. | ||
That's boys being built like boys and the society being wrong for them. | ||
That's boys being built like boys and the society being wrong for them. | ||
So men are at a massive, massive disadvantage. | ||
And you're right. | ||
I mean, look at the suicide rates. | ||
Look at the self-harm rates amongst men. | ||
It's astronomical and only growing as more and more of these policies get implemented that demonize the natural inclinations of men. | ||
So again, what would be a what would be a comprehensive thing we could do about this? | ||
I mean, would it just be to remove any differences in sex when it comes to legal decisions like Like any decision that would be made for a man would be exactly the same for a woman. | ||
Would it be better just to have pure, unbiased equality in the courts? | ||
Or what would you like to see, Alex? | ||
unidentified
|
Technically that's true, there is no bias, but the reality is the difference. | |
The highlight of the, if you look at the online and the general consensus, the people are waking up. | ||
There are women, grandmothers, mothers out there who cannot see their children because of these biases in the system, the grandparents. | ||
There are a lot of women seeing their brothers and their own new partners going through this hell. | ||
It is a hell that the men are being put through. | ||
And it needs to change. | ||
And it is backed by the feminist movement. | ||
George Soros donated $300 million just recently to the feminist movement. | ||
Do you know how many domestic violence shelters there are for men compared to animal shelters? | ||
There are more dog shelters than there are for men who are under domestic violence. | ||
And the stats show that in lesbian couples, there is a higher violence rate and that single fathers actually have a better outcome with their children than two partners. | ||
It's not a topic we cover very much, but I'm glad you called in about it, Alex. | ||
Thank you for that. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
We've got your calls here. | ||
We just had an interesting caller from Australia talking about the way they're raking against men in family courts. | ||
We've got a couple of callers who want to respond to him. | ||
I'm not sure exactly what it was that he said that made me think of this, but it reminded me of this post that I saw a few days ago. | ||
It's from a couple of years ago. | ||
I just think it says so much. | ||
In this one line. | ||
Facebook's race blind algorithm backfires in their face, finds 90% of hate speech was directed towards white people and men. | ||
Doesn't that tell you, doesn't that say a lot to you? | ||
It says a lot to me. | ||
What does it mean the algorithm backfired? | ||
It did what they said for it to do. | ||
They wrote an algorithm. | ||
They told the algorithm, you know, Investigate hate speech, find out who the hate speech is coming from, who it's directed towards, and 90% of it was white men. | ||
That's just, that's just it working correctly. | ||
But to these people, they live in a world of delusion, so the algorithm backfired. | ||
It went all out of whack. | ||
It went all out of control. | ||
No, that was, it did what it was supposed to do. | ||
You just don't like the results. | ||
There's something about the way they do this. | ||
Facebook's race blind practices around hate speech came at the expense of black users, new documents show. | ||
Researchers proposed a fix to the race, to the biased algorithm, but one internal document predicted pushback from conservative partners. | ||
Yeah, because again, because you can't, because in these people's minds, you can't just Legitimately believe things that are true. | ||
You have to have some sort of devious reason for believing the truth. | ||
Conservative partners will probably try to twist this. | ||
It's like, well, your algorithm just told the truth. | ||
You don't like it. | ||
So now you're trying to manipulate it to get the outcome that you want, even though it's based on a delusion of yours. | ||
It's just how it goes. | ||
Over and over and over. | ||
So let's go out to the calls. | ||
We've got Andrew in New Jersey who wants to follow up on the caller from Australia. | ||
Go on, Andrew, you're on the air. | ||
Yeah, in a different way. | ||
Not necessarily court, but he was right about that. | ||
I was leaving the Democrat Party because I saw how they took fathers out of the home, especially in the inner cities, to the black community. | ||
But they'll do it to everyone. | ||
And I got to see firsthand the difference in the black community that had fathers because I lived right next to the inner city. | ||
And mostly in my town of South Orange, New Jersey, there were two-parent homes. | ||
Not all the time, but mostly. | ||
And the kids that were any race but black, they went to college, they never got in trouble with the cops. | ||
But then you saw the kids that didn't have fathers, regardless of race, those were the drug dealers. | ||
Those were the ones that got arrested. | ||
So I was always down on it. | ||
And Jim Brown, who I like, he was a big Trump supporter, but he had an anti-violence rally in Newark, New Jersey, and the mayor, Raz Baraka, I confronted him because I work for the local news. | ||
Which was a risky move, and I said, why aren't we talking about the lack of fathers in the homes here in the inner city? | ||
And I pointed up the road. | ||
I said, I lived right up the street in South Orange, and we were actually on South Orange Avenue in Newark, and I said, there were black people all around me, and none of them shot each other on the weekend. | ||
Like, it was unheard of. | ||
And I said, they mostly had fathers, and then the mayor responded by saying, well, he said it doesn't matter if the black kid has a father. | ||
He said there weren't shootings because the economy is better in South Orange. | ||
So it's a double lie. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm sure. | |
First, it does matter. | ||
And second, South Orange is just a little village. | ||
There's not even hardly any economy other than the pizzeria and the bagel store. | ||
But Newark is actually a city where all the jobs and the money goes to from the state and the federal. | ||
unidentified
|
So that just shows how bad they are. | |
It's one of those things that, I mean, this is scientifically confirmed over and over and over. | ||
Like if you need a study, as if you need a study to know that, you know, the best way to raise a kid is with their mother and father in a home where the parents are together and love each other. | ||
Like it's just, it's obvious from observation. | ||
It's obvious. | ||
You should know this from birth. | ||
I think people do. | ||
I think, I think intrinsically they do, which is why I think, I mean, I think that's a big part of why being fatherless causes people to lash out. | ||
Cause it's like, you know, you know, you just know you have. | ||
And I said this a while ago about having a kid where it's like, it's great. | ||
being a father because it's amazing having a father like imagine having you know if you're a kid there's there's literally a giant that is just like your best friend in there to like fight for you and protect you and it's it's just the best thing ever and when you grow up without one of those you see everybody else has a dad and you don't there's this like vindictiveness that's in there and so it's a very weird psychological | ||
levers that are pulled because the other thing is that there's a weird like reverence for absent fathers especially in the black community where it's like you know this kid's dad's never seen him never been there never provided anything just left the mom dumped her and moved on and had another kid with somebody else and moved on and and yet there's like a reverence for them and like a again it's i don't know it's just it's just basic human psychology but But yeah, that's like the biggest issue in the black community. | ||
And the reason I don't want to talk about it is because you can't blame anybody else for it. | ||
If you're a deadbeat dad, that was a choice you made. | ||
No one forced you into that. | ||
If you're a single mother, that's a choice you made. | ||
It just is. | ||
A risky behavior or, you know, deliberately doing it. | ||
Seventy-five plus percent of black kids are born to single mothers? | ||
Seventy-five percent? | ||
And we wonder why they're not doing well? | ||
And we want to blame racism and slavery for this? | ||
A hundred years after slavery, black families were more likely to be born to two parents. | ||
Like black kids were more likely to be born to two parents. | ||
It was only when the welfare system was put into place that all of this collapsed. | ||
So there are incentives that can guide the behavior of entire groups, but on the individual level, it's up to them, and they don't have anybody to blame. | ||
Yeah, fathers are clearly the missing ingredient here. | ||
Thank you for the call, Andrew. | ||
Let's go to Ariel in Washington, another follow-up on the Australian caller. | ||
Thanks for calling in, Ariel. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, thank you, Harrison. | |
First of all, I just want to introduce myself. | ||
I was raised by my dad and also by his adopted mother, and my mother was a tree planter for 14 years. | ||
So my experience was that I had the benefit of being in a household which was very, very maternal matriarchal. | ||
Since my grandmother had so much experience raising children, she'd raised over 30 children, including foster children, and then my dad learned from her about how to parent. | ||
So he knew he was bottle feeding when he was a young child. | ||
Right. | ||
So, um, so from my perspective, a concern that I have, I agree with you about protecting women and children because Especially in times where there's social disruption, you will find that there might be more instances of addiction cycles, and that can lead to disruption in households from both parents. | ||
So the safety of children is really important, but the problem is that sometimes these problems are social engineered into society in order to reinvent society. | ||
So sort of like what happened with the Hitler Youth, for example, that terrible time in history that I find completely important to – I don't like to look at it because I find it upsetting. | ||
But when I look upon those times, I understand that those patterns are being implemented under different names. | ||
And they – I think it's important to not just look at it as only a race issue. | ||
One of the trappings we can fall into is an us-and-them paradigm. | ||
So, for example, discussing race politics, and Black America, and the prison-industrial complex, and this slavery loophole, the 13th Amendment. | ||
And, you know, the problems of the... Thank you for the call, Ariel. | ||
I mean, the reason it's a racial thing is because of the disparities between the races. | ||
I mean, 75%, that's huge. | ||
No other race comes close to that. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
Let's talk a little bit about psychological operations, shall we? | ||
One of the largest, most active military Psychological Operations Groups, it's called the 4th Psychological Operations Group, or 4th POGA, is one of the United States Army's active military information support operation units, along with the 8th Psychological Operations Group. | ||
The 8th group was responsible for the 3rd and 9th Psychological Operation Battalions, while the 4th group is responsibility for the 1st, 5th, 6th, and 8th Battalions. | ||
If you go to their actual Military Command Website United States Army Special Operations Command Dark Horse PSYOP Detachment PsyOp forces are masters of influence, the core of information warfare. | ||
We conduct influence activities to target psychological vulnerabilities and create or intensify fissures, confusion, and doubt in adversary organizations. | ||
We will use all available means of dissemination, from sensitive to high-tech, sensitive and high-tech to low-tech and no-tech, the methods from overt clandestine to deception. | ||
This, of course, is the This is a DOT military website for the 4th Psychological Group Operation Unit. | ||
The 4th Psychological Operation Unit Airborne consists of Headquarters Company and five regional PSYOP battalions. | ||
Each P.O.B. | ||
is regionally aligned and supports a geographic combatant command in the planning and execution of MISO series. | ||
And they talk about how they have these PSYOP forces deployed around the world. | ||
And of course, one thing that we know is that these psychological operations are now active in the continental United States. | ||
And they're headquartered at a place that used to be called Fort Bragg until a weird sort of, uh, I don't know, self-fulfilling sort of thing where the psychological operations is itself the subject of a psychological operation to | ||
Humiliating and demonize Americans in our history by renaming our forts from the heroes of our past to Increasingly meaningless words platitudes, so it was Fort Bragg now. | ||
It's called for Liberty and Is the home to the fourth psychological operations group which is the central command for the worldwide psychological operations and an image just | ||
Leaked from Fort Bragg, Fort Liberty, published by Samosar on X, an anti-terrorism brief was held on Fort Liberty, Bragg, today, where they listed several pro-life organizations as terrorist organizations. | ||
The slide you see here followed right after a slide about ISIS, a terrorist group in the Middle East. | ||
The organizations labeled by the army as terror organizations include the National Right to Life and Operation Rescue. | ||
They also included a screenshot of a license plate with IM4IT, which is a plate many pro-life citizens put on their car, which implies normal citizens are terrorists if they display this plate. | ||
I'm for it. | ||
The slide goes on to mention activities which these organizations participate in, which include being pro-life, opposing Roe vs. Wade, which they spelled wrong, by the way, in the actual presentation. | ||
R-O-W rather than R-O-E, but that's okay. | ||
Demonstrating and protesting, which is a First Amendment protected right. | ||
Truth displays and picketing. | ||
They also falsely attribute the bombing of abortion clinics to national right to life. | ||
While meanwhile, hundreds of Pregnancy centers are burned by Antifa in a single year. | ||
Keep in mind, they're not labeling them as extremist organizations, which would still be crazy, but as terrorist organizations. | ||
The military and Department of Defense are insanely out of control. | ||
Service members are being indoctrinated to view pro-life groups as the enemy, as literal terrorists. | ||
I'll blow this picture up a little bit more so you can see exactly what it says. | ||
Terrorist groups is the headline of this slide. | ||
Anti-abortion, Right to Life and Operation Rescue, Pro-Life, Oppose Roe vs. Wade, Types of Advocacy, Demonstrations and Protests, Mass Demonstrations, Life Chain, The Rescue, The Truth Display, Picketing, Counseling, Sidewalk, Crisis Center, License Plates. | ||
They have Operation Rescue, National Right to Life, and the license plate, I'm For It, Choose Life. | ||
And the psychological operations headquarters at Fort Bragg is now indoctrinating American soldiers into the belief that pro-life organizations are literal terrorists. | ||
Does that tell you where we are yet? | ||
Does that let you know how far down the trail towards tyranny we have come? | ||
Where they're declaring half of the country that's pro-life as having terrorist sympathies. | ||
And V on X made an interesting note about this post at not underscore underscore V. He says a very useful tactic that the Soviets used was not to invent new words, but to apply new meanings to existing words. | ||
In this situation, the word terrorist gives people the views of 9-11 or the Nice attacks. | ||
So by including pro-lifers in the definition of the word, they expect people to have the same emotions towards the pro-lifers that they do towards the terrorists. | ||
It also helps with government statistics as pro-life rallies can now be described as a terror event and thus justify more funding for the anti-terrorist organizations that will now be more focused on combating non-problematic events rather than actually dealing with terrorism, which is more difficult and costly. | ||
I think that's a very good point. | ||
Hijacking the phrase terrorism and applying it to just political advocacy. | ||
And just declaring, now if you're pro-life, now you're a terrorist. | ||
You have a pro-life rally that is a terrorist event. | ||
We'll tag that up on the board. | ||
And it will then become proof of how big of an issue this is, because we'll see that the pro-abortion people, they've got, they're having terrorist events all the time. | ||
Just constant terrorist activity from the pro-life people. | ||
You know, picketing or demonstrating. | ||
Or in some other way, expressing their First Amendment. | ||
And other people in this who were at that presentation confirmed that never once was the word Antifa brought up. | ||
Never once was it mentioned the fact that there are well organized and well publicized literal terrorist groups. | ||
That as we've been showing you on the screen have burned down dozens if not hundreds of pregnancy centers following the reversal of Roe versus Wade. | ||
So our military is being trained to consider pro-lifers who pray outside of abortion clinics as literal terrorists. | ||
While never once even mentioning the dozens of pro-life centers that were burned down in acts of terror. - Yeah. | ||
And arson is a often used tactic of Antifa and there's actually some pretty Extreme examples of that from just a few days ago. | ||
We'll get into that a little bit later, but we'll go out to your phone calls now. | ||
Howard in North Carolina, thank you so much for calling in and for holding your on about Lucas Gage. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead, sir. | |
Good morning, Harrison, the host with the most spectacular vernacular. | ||
Playing globes like Dracula. | ||
You know, you got it going on, my friend. | ||
Yeah, yeah. | ||
And I love the coffee cup. | ||
It's really just kind of changed my momentum right here. | ||
Reminds me of a song. | ||
You may know it. | ||
Oh, beautiful for spacious skies, for amber waves of grain. | ||
Oh, my. | ||
America! | ||
God shed his grace on thee. | ||
Oh, and crown thy good with brotherhood from sea to shining sea. | ||
That was beautiful, Howard. | ||
You got quite a voice on you. | ||
unidentified
|
Bless you, friend. | |
Thank you. | ||
unidentified
|
You kind of got me. | |
I got a little distracted. | ||
That was great, man. | ||
That was moving. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, bless you, sir. | |
We only got a minute left. | ||
So what's on your mind, Howard? | ||
unidentified
|
All right, real quick, the reason I'm calling, you can check in Amos chapter 5, I believe it's verse 34, 24-34, talks about the star of your God that Israel had kind of set up. | |
And it's really what they call today the Star of David. | ||
It's likely, according to Scripture, again repeated by Stephen in the book of Acts, in his final words before they stoned him to death, he reminded them they set up a star of their God, Moloch. | ||
And we know Moloch loves child sacrifice. | ||
So, you know, this kind of thing where we as Christians just have to jump on board because we see this star of David. | ||
They tell us the star of David. | ||
David didn't have a star. | ||
David had a Lord. | ||
David had a God that led him and drove him to where he was and brought him back home after he fell. | ||
You know, that's David's relationship. | ||
This whole thing where we're set up to believe that the Israel we see today is the one we're supposed to stand behind. | ||
Yeah, it's not. | ||
It's a creation of the Rothschild banking dynasty. | ||
It has nothing to do with the biblical Israelis. | ||
I completely agree. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
We may have to get somebody from Idaho on sometime soon, because there's so much stuff going on in Idaho and Coeur d'Alene. | ||
Hate crime, hoaxes, and it's like the most conservative part of the most conservative state in our country. | ||
This area in northern Idaho. | ||
And yet so much is happening as Californians basically flee the You know, rubbish that their state has become, move to Idaho, and then bring all of their politics along with them. | ||
And it's actually turning violent. | ||
The far left is celebrating this from Andy Ngo, at MrAndyNgo on X. The far left is celebrating an arson attack on a firearm store in North Idaho owned by a Republican candidate running for the State House of Representatives. | ||
The Army Surplus One store in Sandpoint was burned down on July 4th. | ||
Idaho State Fire Marshal's Office and ATF determined the fire was an arson attack. | ||
The store is owned by a conservative Christian, Cornel Razor, is running as a Republican for the Idaho House of Representatives. | ||
Surveillance video captured a masked person going behind the store before the fire started. | ||
Sandpoint police are asking those with CCTV footage or information to contact them. | ||
But then the really disturbing thing, and I believe I believe that this is somebody actually running in opposition. | ||
I believe this is a local politician. | ||
I could be wrong about that, but Alicia Abbott at Abbott A. Lynn. | ||
A local supply hub for the Christian Nationalist American Redoubt and anti-government militia movements burned to the ground last night in Sandpoint with no injuries. | ||
The owner is a notorious redoubter who's running for Idaho legislator. | ||
Fireworks got it. | ||
Not sad. | ||
My community got safer overnight. | ||
My community got safer overnight. | ||
And nothing cleans up the neighborhood like a little bit of arson, right? | ||
unidentified
|
it. | |
Just a little arson to make everybody feel safe. | ||
So unless I'm wrong, I don't know, maybe I am. | ||
Let's look up who this woman is. | ||
Alicia Abbott. | ||
We'll find out who this is just so I don't speak out of turn. | ||
But if I'm not mistaken, I believe she is a community leader. | ||
Idaho and helping either Idaho and survive bad policymakers. | ||
So I don't know. | ||
She's some leftist whistling in in Idaho. | ||
I'm not sure if she has any official positions or not. | ||
But that's that's sort of the mindset that we're dealing with here is. | ||
Celebrating the arson attack. | ||
So I was trying to illustrate a little bit yesterday. | ||
This idea that these liberals and leftists. | ||
Don't actually have morals, like they don't actually have any fundamental ethics. | ||
It is all about power to them. | ||
And never once will you hear them go, Hey, look, we want to, we want to win. | ||
We want to defeat these guys, but we have differences with these guys politically, but can't burn a man's business to the ground because you disagree with him. | ||
No, they're like, yeah, you can actually, and you should. | ||
And our community is safer now because the store is gone. | ||
Because the radical mask-wearing terrorist burned down a profitable business that sold camouflage things. | ||
That sold water bottles and tents. | ||
I mean, I know this isn't the America that we grew up in, but this is the America that exists now. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Thank you. | ||
This type of stuff is not going to go away. | ||
It's only going to increase, especially as you have the groups that do enjoy burning down the businesses of their political rivals, receive total cover and basically carte blanche from the Authorities who refuse to even acknowledge the fact that the arson groups exist, that the terrorist networks are operating. | ||
Instead, they claim that the victims of the arson are the terrorists, therefore justifying the arson itself as some sort of extrajudicial justice in their warped, demented minds. | ||
So arson being celebrated as a viable political maneuver in Idaho. | ||
Welcome back. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, joined today by the one and only Dan Lyman, BorderHawk News field reporter. | ||
He's a journalist and contributor to InfoWars. | ||
He covers many prominent issues, including immigration, geopolitics, and elite gatherings, such as Bilderberg and the World Economic Forum. | ||
His website is borderhawk.news, and you can find him on X at realdanlyman, borderhawk.news, at realdanlyman. | ||
Dan, welcome to the show, sir. | ||
It's great to be with you, Harrison. | ||
Thank you for having me. | ||
Very glad to have you here, and there's a lot I want your input on. | ||
First of all, we covered yesterday the BorderHawk reporting on the end of the trials of Arizona rancher Greg Kelly. | ||
There was some fear that he could be retried for this murder charge for illegals on his property. | ||
It has been Vacated it's it's over now judge Fink has ruled that Arizona rancher Alan Kelly. | ||
I'm sorry said Greg Kelly That's the that's the um guy used to be on Fox Alan Kelly's case in the shooting of death of an illegal on his property is dismissed with prejudice It cannot be brought back to court So that's a win, Dan. | ||
We're racking this up as a win, which may be kind of pathetic, but we get so few victories these days. | ||
We count everything. | ||
What do you know about this trial and how it's unfolded? | ||
No, it's true. | ||
This is definitely a bit of a white pill. | ||
Thankfully, we had a very reasonable judge in this case. | ||
Who has dismissed this, uh, this case forever. | ||
So basically, uh, as you actually talked to my brother, our field reporter in studio, because he actually sat in on this trial for multiple days in Arizona, we've monitored this one pretty closely because it really is an interesting precedent to keep an eye on because essentially, uh, Mr. Kelly, who owns a ranch in Arizona has been under siege on his property for many years by crossings of illegal aliens and smugglers and cartel operatives who have come across his land. | ||
And basically has been living in a constant state of fear, I would say. | ||
I mean, he's a tough guy, but, you know, he's living alone on this property, very large property with his wife. | ||
They're both on the elderly side, and they've been putting up with this for many years. | ||
And they've gotten very, very little help from the federal government and local authorities. | ||
And apparently in this case, Specifically there were he says armed men multiple armed men on his property at the time in early 23 when this happened and he says that he fired some warning shots into the air to scare them off and eventually when authorities arrived they combed the property and they later much later found a The body of a deceased illegal alien on the property. | ||
And Alan Kelly, George Alan Kelly says he never shot at them. | ||
He shot in the air to scare them off. | ||
But he was arrested and charged with murder of this illegal alien. | ||
And he went to trial for this. | ||
And it was kind of a nail biter because he really wanted to see where this was going to end up. | ||
And thankfully, there was a mistrial declared. | ||
And apparently, only one out of eight jurors wanted to convict. | ||
So the other seven said, absolutely not. | ||
This guy, at minimum, a case of self-defense, defense of property. | ||
But ultimately, the prosecution was never able to locate the rounds, supposedly, that killed this person. | ||
And they were never able to establish a really good case against this poor man. | ||
And so, we had a mistrial, and there was talk of the state trying to bring the trial back again, and thankfully this judge has put this thing to bed forever. | ||
Yeah, so much about this that boggles your mind, why the state would be so desperate to try this guy again. | ||
I mean, they really wanted this guy's head on a stake and yeah, it easily could have been illegal immigrants killing each other on his land and he's getting the blame for it. | ||
And I remember one of the... | ||
Sort of sad things about this was when they were describing the events of that day that Mr. Kelly and his wife, it was almost routine how they described like, well, there's illegals on our lands. | ||
I go get my gun. | ||
I shoot in the air to scare him off. | ||
It was like, it was such a regular thing for them. | ||
It was only a matter of time before, you know, something went badly. | ||
And then you had protesters at the courthouse demanding that he be convicted. | ||
Like you had anti Kelly protesters at the courthouse wanting him to go to jail for life, I guess, for defending himself on his own land from interlopers crossing without restriction. | ||
So just a bunch of bizarre stuff, but an actual good outcome for once, which is just fantastic. | ||
And hopefully he can just move on with his life and maybe get a ranch somewhere else that's not along the border. | ||
I can't imagine it's worth the hassle of this. | ||
Anything else we need to know about George Allen Kelly before we move on to some other topics here? | ||
Yeah, I mean we're just thankful that this sets a good precedent because if American citizens can't protect their land, Um, you know, for instance, if he had shot this person who was trespassing on his land and he felt threatened by armed men on his property, if you're not allowed to stand up for yourself, to stand up for your family, uh, in the face of an invasion, literally from another country, um, you know, what do we have left in terms of the rule of law in this country? | ||
Um, but, uh, but, but the case was never even made against him. | ||
I mean, they just found this body on his property for all we know it was planted there. | ||
He could have, this person could have been killed. | ||
By a fellow illegal or smugglers or something like that. | ||
So we really don't know but it's good to see this one get put away. | ||
There is still apparently the possibility of a civil case being brought by the victim's family. | ||
That remains to be seen. | ||
I know the Mexican consulate has been very involved in this case. | ||
They sent Delegates to the courthouse every day to sit in on this trial makes you wonder what's going on there But basically, you know, I mean, I'm just looking at my notes here on this case It looks like you know an act of God here He had a great legal team and I'm sure this cost him an unbelievable amount of money and of course it cost the state a large amount of money definitely over a million bucks to try this case and those those resources would certainly be put to use better in other places such as securing the border and | ||
And it's sort of emblematic, isn't it, the fact that the government fails to uphold its end of the bargain, fails to provide even the most basic functions of a government, which if you boil down all of government to one function, it should be to protect people in the border from the people outside of the border. | ||
Like, if that was the only thing they did... | ||
That's, you know, that would be it. | ||
If they only did one thing, that would be it. | ||
They don't do that. | ||
And then if the American people have to do the job for them, have to protect themselves in the same way that if they don't arrest shoplifters, you know, you're going to get a lot of shots. | ||
Suddenly you have to have your goods locked up and you have to, you know, suffer more. | ||
So the government here is just leaving Americans out to dry. | ||
And even if you try to make up for their failures, they come after you. | ||
They want us weak and defenseless and helpless in the face of all of this, of the flood of illegals, the flood of crime, the flood of just criminality across the board. | ||
This is by design, and they will punish you for standing up against it. | ||
It's emblematic in a lot of ways. | ||
Yes, indeed, and this is a perfect example of anarcho-tyranny. | ||
We are living in a state of anarcho-tyranny in this country, and we see cases like these which really embody that, where there is a state of anarchy at the U.S. | ||
southern border, and then there is tyranny for American citizens who try to defend their property. | ||
Totally despicable, and the scale of this operation just continually boggles my mind. | ||
I mean, you think you have an understanding, you see the images of the caravans coming across, or you hear about the Darien Gap and the safe houses all the way through Central America, but then it's like every week or so there's some new story that is just like a reminder or it just ramps up and it's like, wow, this Operation is so unbelievably huge, and the amount of money that's spent to carry it out, and the amount of damage it's doing to the American people. | ||
And you have this story from borderhawk.news. | ||
Bombshell European Union funding the invasion of the United States. | ||
So I thought it was bad enough when you had the NGOs, and the American government, and the UN, and all of these other forces coordinating this, but the UN, or the EU rather, is in on it too. | ||
Is that right? | ||
Yeah, apparently. | ||
So this probably shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who follows these stories and this issue. | ||
But still, when you learn these things, you just say, wow, it really is even deeper than I ever imagined. | ||
And so basically, we have a friend, a photojournalist named James Breeden, who actually was the one that captured that incredible footage of the riot in El Paso right at the border a few months back. | ||
I believe it was March where hundreds of illegals stormed across a National Guard established barrier, attacked the guardsmen at the barrier, injured a couple of them, and then made their way to the border fence and demanded to be let into the country. | ||
It was a very violent scene, and James Breeden was the photojournalist that captured that incredible footage. | ||
And of course, sorry to interrupt, but since then, all of their cases have been dismissed, and they've been released into the country. - Indeed, indeed. | ||
Just unbelievable. | ||
Another example of anarcho-tyranny, of course. | ||
But James was down in the Darien area of Panama, and of course the Darien Gap is this super, super gnarly jungle that separates basically South America from Central America and the Northern Hemisphere. | ||
And it's a very, very tough place to get across. | ||
But people do indeed come across hundreds of thousands, if not millions, have come across the Darien Gap in recent years and make their way north from there. | ||
And basically at the other side of the gap on the north side, north side of this insane jungle, there are a variety of small towns. | ||
And they're basically the first places that these people encounter after being out in the jungle, for instance, for like a week at a time. | ||
And in these towns are established all of these reception centers. | ||
And basically they are areas where illegals on their way to the US can fuel up, can get a break, can take a shower, get some food, whatever it is that they need to do. | ||
And a lot of these services are provided for free by humanitarian groups with a quote unquote around it. | ||
And they basically are helping these people down there as they recharge on their way to the U.S. | ||
And I will say, even Franklin Graham's group, the name of the group is escaping me at the moment, but who does really amazing aid work in the U.S., they even have a station down there, as was recently documented by Bald and Bankrupt. | ||
So I think that will come as a surprise to many who contribute to that organization, and I won't say their name. | ||
But what we did uncover is that the European Union is actually funding some of these reception centers down there in a town called, I had it just written up here, Blancas, something Blancas. | ||
Well, we'll get back to that in a sec. | ||
But anyways, in one of these towns right here in the Darien area of Panama, They're funding one of these reception centers, if not a bunch of them, and basically these aid packages, their bags full of necessities, whatever it is, are being given out to migrants on their way through the Darién, on their way to the U.S. | ||
And so we looked into this a bit. | ||
We got these photographs from Mr. Breeden, and they clearly show them carrying these bags, and the bags say that they're funded by the European Union and distributed by the Panamanian Red Cross. | ||
And so we've looked into that and learned that in the past couple of years the EU has really ramped up their efforts | ||
To distribute aid in Central America and one of the objectives they claim that it's for humanitarian purposes and you know mostly for crisis stricken areas but they explicitly say to aid transnational migrants in their press release and they allocated something like 157 million euro to this project and they they touted the establishment of an aid stockpile in Panama and so what I think we are seeing here is the actual rollout of this aid | ||
And it of course coincides with the United Nations work in the area and they actually explicitly say that the United Nations is distributing this aid in the area and they're managing some of these shelters and they're basically, you know, refueling illegals on their way to the US. | ||
And I just want to tie this back to a story that we actually covered many years ago at InfoWars Europe. | ||
We actually exposed in 2018 that the United Nations and the European Union were also funding the invasion of Europe, which, of course, isn't really surprising. | ||
But basically, we uncovered that they were giving out prepaid debit cards to migrants that were bound for the European Union. | ||
And those are being distributed, for instance, in the Balkans. | ||
We uncovered that in Croatia and in Slovenia, where they were coming up ...through the Balkans and receiving these prepaid debit cards. | ||
And we were the first American English-speaking outlet to put this report out and it gained such momentum that even the Hungarian government cited some of our reporting when they put in an inquiry with the European Union saying, hey, are you actually giving prepaid debit cards with European money to migrants that are bound for Europe? | ||
And sure enough, it was true. | ||
The European Union eventually responded to that request and admitted, yeah, that's exactly what we're doing. | ||
And barely a week later, the Hungarians actually caught a suspected terrorist in Budapest who is carrying one of these cards. | ||
It was emblazoned with the European Union logo. | ||
And the reason that I say that story is because this same exact agenda is actually playing out in Central and South America, the same playbook. | ||
And so I wouldn't be surprised if there's European Union involvement in it, but there certainly is United Nations involvement in it, where migrants making their way to the U.S. | ||
are receiving the same prepaid debit cards. | ||
It's just insane. | ||
I mean, obviously, it's just sort of an expansion of what we already knew to be true. | ||
But it again, just boggles your mind how little sense any of this makes. | ||
So the European Union is funding aid to caravans in Panama for people invading the United States. | ||
Like what? | ||
How does how does any of this qualify? | ||
How does any of this make any sense at all? | ||
What is the European Union even doing in America? | ||
And why are they funding this invasion? | ||
Why are the excuses that were used in Europe with the wars in the Middle East, those don't apply to South or Central America? | ||
There's no major wars going on, you know, driving this immigration to the United States. | ||
I mean, the number of organizations and people and the amount of money that's going into this, I just don't think I have trouble wrapping my mind around the scale. | ||
I mean, what do you think normal people think? | ||
I mean, is the average normie even aware any of this is happening? | ||
I worry that like, you know, what we know could just fill libraries, right? | ||
With all this stuff. | ||
Is the average person even aware that this is going on? | ||
Do they have any idea? | ||
Or do they think that, like, the border is secure? | ||
Do they believe Alejandro Mayorkas that, like, everything's operating normally and it's just, like, a hotel in New York that's causing some trouble? | ||
You know, and that's all they know about it. | ||
Like, do people have any idea the scale of this? | ||
Of course not. | ||
I will say that one of the most heinous aspects to all of this is that, of course, all of this funding that we're talking about is coming straight out of our pockets and straight out of the pockets of our children and grandchildren. | ||
And that really is one of the worst aspects of it. | ||
And of course, anything the United Nations does is funded by the United States, the tune of approximately 25 percent. | ||
And we're the biggest funders of their overall budget. | ||
And where does that money come from? | ||
It comes from, of course, the American taxpayer. | ||
But of course, in the European Union, that's the case as well from European taxpayers. | ||
So we are funding our own invasions. | ||
We're finding the invasions of our neighboring, you know, brother countries. | ||
And it's just totally insane. | ||
But if you accept the premise that the Great Replacement is a global conspiracy and agenda that is out in the open, open, then it's not really surprising at all when you find out that all these supranational bodies are working with governmental bodies and non-governmental bodies and supposed humanitarian organizations to fund basically the destruction of Western world and the replacement of the Western population, then it really isn't all that surprising at all. | ||
However, going back to your question, I will say that I've had the opportunity in the past few weeks to spend a little time amongst the normies, which I don't necessarily do all that often. | ||
And people are starting to get it. | ||
They're starting to sense that something is very wrong. | ||
They're starting to see that their neighborhoods are changing at a very rapid rate. | ||
And they're starting to get the fact that people are being brought into this country at an unprecedented rate in unprecedented numbers. | ||
Most of them are coming in through illicit operations that are either executed by organized criminal bodies in other countries or the organized criminal body running this country. | ||
And at this point, they're starting to see that their country is being stolen from them. | ||
And that's good. | ||
People are waking up. | ||
But now it's a race. | ||
It's a race to basically to ultimate power, control over the United States and also the Western world at large. | ||
And unfortunately, what we're seeing actually in Europe most recently is that in the elections there, Even when we think we might put up a win, that the good guys might win and that there might be some semblance of sanity return, losing time after time in the UK, in France. | ||
I mean, these parties that are looking pretty good, especially in France, going in, Le Pen's party, totally just dominated by basically subversive tactics. | ||
And the will of the French people has been subverted again. | ||
And so we are seeing that even though more people are waking up, the other side, the people that want to replace our populations are still gaining ground and they're gaining power. | ||
And we're about to find out how much power they can actually hold on to and wield in the upcoming elections as well. | ||
Right. | ||
How effectively they can dismiss or override the democratic will. | ||
And this, of course, is the great irony of it all, is that we're supposed to go to war with Russia because, you know, our democracy, and then the results of the elections show that the vast majority of the people in Europe, whether it's France or the UK, the majority of the voters voted for right-wing parties, and yet the right-wing parties are completely kept out of power, not given even the, you know, slightest bit of control. | ||
They get, you know, they'll get 50% of the vote and 10% of the representation or something like that. | ||
So it's a total fraud. | ||
It's just all complete and utter ridiculous fraud. | ||
And then you look at like poll results where they ask Europeans, do we have too much migration? | ||
And something like 95% of them say, yeah, that's too much. | ||
We need less. | ||
And yet not a single one of these countries is limiting their migration at all. | ||
They're in fact just stepping it up and making new laws and continually passing new measures that say even arguing against immigration will now be illegal. | ||
And any European country that refuses to bring in more migrants will be sued by the EU. | ||
I mean, they're putting these things in place. | ||
We've covered it over the last few days. | ||
$50 billion of German welfare money going towards non-German foreigners living in their lands. | ||
The French elections, obviously, the UK elections. | ||
I've got stories here of the way that they're actually flying. | ||
They're doing the same thing that they're doing here in America. | ||
They're doing it in Europe now too, where they're actually going to Afghanistan. | ||
The German government is loading people onto a plane in Afghanistan and flying them into Germany. | ||
They're not even waiting for the migrants to arrive. | ||
They're going out and picking them up in the same way that America has... | ||
You know, little, little headquarters in South and Central American countries to actually fly people in and avoid the deadlock at the border entirely. | ||
So just a massive, unrelenting stream of migration to all Western white countries, America and Western Europe. | ||
And they cannot escape no matter how much the people want them to. | ||
I mean, at what point do people give up on voting? | ||
At what point do people recognize, all right, 90% of us want this and we can't get it done. | ||
There's got to be something else. | ||
I mean, how long are people going to put up with the non-cure of voting? | ||
I mean, how long are people going to play along with the illusion? | ||
The illusion of democracy, of course, or the perils of democracy. | ||
And concurrently with the German government actually flying in Afghans into Germany, which Afghans are some of the most, the worst offenders in terms of crimes that are perpetrated against Europeans. | ||
It is just a constant wave of Afghan crime in Europe. | ||
But at the same time, the Biden administration, it was recently revealed, is going into some of these third world countries. | ||
Cameroon was cited as one of the examples. | ||
And they're actually bringing back by plane people who were denied asylum by the Trump administration and removed from the country. | ||
They're flying them back into the US. | ||
So that's happening in Germany, but it's also happening in the United States. | ||
And not only that, This is just another example of many. | ||
Approximately 30,000 people from select countries including Cuba, Nicaragua, and Haiti, and Venezuela are flying into the United States every single month. | ||
So that program that was rolled out by the Biden administration via the CBP1 app, the CHNV parole program, has enabled 500,000 plus people from these countries to fly into the United States to ports of entry, and this is considered legal because they applied for this ability to enter the U.S. legally ahead of time, and they've done that just in the last 18 months or so alone. | ||
So we're flying them in. | ||
They're flying in. | ||
They're coming across the border. | ||
They're coming across by boat. | ||
They're landing boats in California. | ||
It is just an all-out assault on the United States from every angle, and the government is totally complicit in this. | ||
And to your question, I don't know what comes after people realize that their vote no longer matters. | ||
It will be interesting to see what happens in France, for instance, and you raise a great point about polling, polling done by the Zsájáveg Institute in Hungary. | ||
Every single year, they poll about 35,000 people, which is a massive sample size, 1,000 people from every country in the European Union and in the adjacent countries as well, and the results are the same. | ||
Nearly every single year, one of the top issues is mass migration and open borders, and it is the overwhelming opinion of Europeans that there is way too much of it and that it needs to We're seeing similar polling in the United States now, where more than 60% of the overall American population voters are saying we need mass deportations and even nearly half of Democrats are agreeing with that. | ||
So Americans are getting it. | ||
They get it. | ||
They get that this is a total, full-blown catastrophe, an existential crisis. | ||
However, Our elected leaders, quote-unquote elected, are not listening to us at all. | ||
They're doing the exact opposite. | ||
It's only getting worse. | ||
Stay with us, Dan. | ||
I got a lot more questions for you on the other side. | ||
unidentified
|
Dan Lyman is my guest. | |
VoterHawk.News at Real Dan Lyman. | ||
We're talking about immigration. | ||
I also want to get into DEI. | ||
And it's so interesting how so many of the topics that we cover They have these through lines. | ||
They have these relations to each other. | ||
I guess you can sum it up by just saying it's all anti-white. | ||
Like that's just the easiest way to say it. | ||
It's like you've got immigration, which if you oppose that they'll call you racist. | ||
And then they've got the DEI program, which is just obviously there to disadvantage white people and advantage non-white people. | ||
And then even voter fraud. | ||
We can't have voter security because that's racist apparently. | ||
And black people don't have IDs. | ||
And there's just this through line of racial hatred that, you know, pervades all of this. | ||
And it's strange because we're talking about voter fraud and we're talking about hiring practices and corporations and we're talking about invasion. | ||
But they all are sort of on the same spectrum. | ||
They're all part of the same movement. | ||
We have this story from Infowars from Kellen McBreen. | ||
Ohio town flooded with African migrants after social media apps teach how to illegally enter the U.S. | ||
Hundreds of illegal aliens from the West African country of Mauritania have recently descended upon Cincinnati, Ohio, thanks to social media apps, TikTok and WhatsApp, providing them with instructions. | ||
And, of course, this is how it works, right? | ||
They spread them the information. | ||
They say, hey, look, if you want, you know, free everything in America, just say these magic words. | ||
Say, open sesame. | ||
Say, I fear violence. | ||
You know, check the right boxes and you're in. | ||
It's like a magic spell that they cast. | ||
And now, apparently, you've got over 8,500 Mauritanians entering the U.S. | ||
just between March and June of this year. | ||
And, of course, this is just one country out of literally hundreds where people are pouring in from. | ||
You know, I feel stupid asking, like, what do we do to crack down on this? | ||
Because it would be easy, right? | ||
I mean, this is the most frustrating part about all this, Dan, is that the solution is as simple as the word no. | ||
It's as simple as saying, no, you can't come. | ||
It's over. | ||
The crisis is over. | ||
So, you know, I want to sit here and go, what can we do to stop this? | ||
But it's like, what can we do to get the right people in office to stop this? | ||
I mean, what do we do to overcome this impotence that we have? | ||
As the as the American people of dealing with this deliberate invasion, subversion and overthrow of our of our nation right now. | ||
I don't really have an answer for that, because every time we try, we're thwarted. | ||
I mean, even right now, the Trump campaign is kind of letting us down left and right with just changing positions on some of these issues, announcing that they have nothing to do with Project 2025, which at least seemed to be like an effort to preemptively staff the administration correctly, which was one of Trump's Biggest downfalls in the past, the prior administration. | ||
And so it's kind of like, I don't know. | ||
I really don't know what we do. | ||
And I just think that things just continue, you know, slowly devolving actually probably in an ever intensifying rate and going back to your Cincinnati story. | ||
It's just incredible as this TikTok video explains to these Mauritanians, which is a predominantly Islamic African country. | ||
And anyone who knows anything about predominantly Islamic African countries knows you don't want those people in your country. | ||
And explains how they can get here. | ||
And there's like now this haven, this enclave of them in Cincinnati. | ||
And anyone who's been through some of the larger Ohio towns recently will know that things are changing there very fast. | ||
I passed through Columbus not too long ago. | ||
And went into a couple of stores to pick up some supplies and I was pretty much the only kind of white heritage stock American walking around. | ||
It looked like the Middle East in the Walmart that I went into. | ||
And, you know, it's just amazing when you picture these places. | ||
It's touching every corner of the United States. | ||
Every town in America is becoming a border town, is being overrun with these people. | ||
And, you know, I even saw a recent account of someone who had just been in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, which is regarded as one of these conservative strongholds that is actually getting more conservative as time goes on. | ||
And you recently just covered that story out of Sandpoint, where I actually used to live. | ||
And I know the guy whose place was burned down. | ||
But even in Coeur d'Alene, on the 4th of July, they said that the beaches were mobbed with foreigners, with Indians, with Middle Easterners, and it's like, where are we gonna go to escape this? | ||
Why aren't we allowed to have a country of our own? | ||
Of course, we're not, unless maybe you count Iceland or something like that. | ||
Right. | ||
But, you know, we're just finding that the invasion is spreading everywhere, and no matter how hard we vote, it just gets worse and worse. | ||
Yeah, and it seems like there's just this Willful ignorance on behalf of the American people or just the I guess the propaganda and the indoctrination has gone so deep people literally cannot Like, conceive of the solutions to this? | ||
Like, they feel bad. | ||
They feel bad. | ||
They feel like it's mean to tell people that they can't take over your country. | ||
And this is, again, the most frustrating part is, like, how do we get through to people? | ||
It's not mean. | ||
It's not rude. | ||
It's not mean. | ||
It's not unfair. | ||
It's not fascist to have your own country. | ||
Because they know this. | ||
They know it because they deplore colonialism, right? | ||
Which is just what's happening to us. | ||
But, you know, they're just so warped. | ||
They think it's like, you know, incumbent on white people. | ||
And it is sort of a form of like reverse white supremacy where like these white people are like, well, you know, we're just so great and awesome and good. | ||
We can't complain about all these people moving in. | ||
You know, we deserve it, sort of. | ||
It's this weird white hatred, but it's all predicated on this sort of assumed belief that like there's no threat ever to white people, that white people will always be, you know, on top and in charge. | ||
And so it doesn't matter what's done to them. | ||
How do we get through to people? | ||
Like, it's fine. | ||
It's fine. | ||
These people grew up for 40 years in Mauritania. | ||
They can go back to Mauritania. | ||
It's not mean. | ||
It's not rude. | ||
It's not vicious of us. | ||
They just go home. | ||
We're sending people back to their home, their country, where they have a government that represents and protects them. | ||
They can go home. | ||
Like how do we get over the fear that people have of just saying we need deportations? | ||
Yeah, absolutely. | ||
I was talking to a friend who actually runs a construction business and he's a pretty reasonable guy. | ||
I would just say kind of center, maybe a little left of center, but totally open to conversation. | ||
And we were having this conversation about some of his workers and he admitted that most of them had come in illegally into the country and that just that's what he could afford to pay, couldn't afford to pay, you know, quality American workers. | ||
But he said, basically, you know, I've gotten to know these guys. | ||
They're really nice. | ||
I like them a lot. | ||
You know, I got no beef with them. | ||
They're actually really hard workers and they do great work. | ||
And I say, that's all great. | ||
That's awesome. | ||
Why can't they do that great work in their countries? | ||
Why aren't all of these people who are supposedly so beneficial to our country, why aren't they back home benefiting their own countries? | ||
Because their own countries, in the words of Donald Trump, are assholes. | ||
They're disgusting places that none of us really would want to go to, with the exception now Probably of El Salvador because Nayib Bukele there recognized that all of the able-bodied people and decent workers and intelligent people of any sort of motivation were leaving his country. | ||
There was a brain drain happening. | ||
So he's kind of reconstructed the economy and he's put all these criminals in prison. | ||
And what they're experiencing there is a resurgence. | ||
And one of the things that he said at the outset of his agenda was, I want to prevent people from leaving my country. | ||
I want people to want to stay in this country. | ||
But what we're seeing in the rest of the countries in the world that are, you know, happily letting, you know, large segments of their population and emptying their prisons, you know, just to all come to the United States, they don't care. | ||
They don't care about having a country, a functional country, because having a non-functional country, dysfunctional country ensures that they stay in power for longer. | ||
And that's really what the ultimate agenda is here in the United States by the elites, is that they want a dysfunctional, totally, you know, just the Road Warrior, Mad Max, as Alex says, society where we're all fighting with each other and the heritage population is under siege by these invaders and that ensures that the police state grows, that ensures that the security state grows, and that also ensures that the people in power stay in power because we don't pose a threat to them. | ||
Yeah, 100%. | ||
Of course, people who are from third world countries, you know, will put up with a lot more than Americans will put up with. | ||
Americans right now are furious that we are like the first, like millennials, some of the first generation to ever be less well off than their parents. | ||
And people recognize this is unfair. | ||
And this is the other thing, right? | ||
How do we get through to people? | ||
All of the problems that they see are not being caused by like, The fact that we're becoming more conservative like the more liberal things get the worse everything gets the more and because I've had the same conversation too I was having it with uh with my brother-in-law where he was you know he's like man nobody can afford a house these days people aren't working but he's got in his mind that it's like because the corporations are evil and it's like no dude you're competing with 30 million You know, Nicaraguans now. | ||
It's deliberate. | ||
It's by design. | ||
And people are feeling the pain in their own lives, but they can't identify where it's coming from. | ||
So it's like, we're like the doctors here that have to try to tell people, no, here's the underlying cause of your issues. | ||
Because they're happy to, you know, put balm on the skin legion, but they have no idea about the cancer that's eating them from the inside out. | ||
So, more with Dan Lyman on the other side. | ||
Hope he can stay with us. | ||
I haven't asked him. | ||
Hopefully he'll be able to stay with us on the other side. | ||
We'll get more into DEI. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
You're getting massive discounts on all of our best products, and it's how we stay on air and in the fight. | ||
Incredible studios, this incredible crew, and my incredible guests, all brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Dan Lyman is joining me. | ||
Borderhawk.news is his site, at RealDanLyman on Twitter, or X. | ||
And, of course, an expert, an authority on all things immigration. | ||
Let's get into DEI, Dan, because I imagine you have some thoughts on that as well. | ||
I'm going to run through this story. | ||
It originally comes from the Daily Caller, but it's been posted by Strive Funds on X. In June, a management proposal passed at Chipotle changing how executives are rewarded for meeting their DEI goals. | ||
This new incentive structure has the potential to undermine shareholders, create a toxic workplace, and even hurt the people it purports to help. | ||
And essentially, they're saying it's not enough just to hire non-white people, which they call diverse, which we know what that actually means. | ||
It's not enough just to hire them, they have to retain them, and so they're going to achieve this, and they say they want to improve the retention rate of our diverse employee workforce relative to those who are non-diverse, which that line alone Tells you what they mean by diverse, right? | ||
Diversity is supposed to mean a plurality. | ||
It's supposed to mean people from different backgrounds. | ||
There should not be such a thing as non-diverse. | ||
That doesn't make any sense. | ||
What they mean is white and non-white, right? | ||
Diversity is not white people. | ||
Non-diverse people are the white people. | ||
They sort of give the game away there. | ||
But note the word relative. | ||
Chipotle doesn't simply want to keep minorities around longer, it wants to keep them longer than their non-minority counterparts. | ||
Meaning that to achieve this, they're being incentivized to fire non-minority workers and to retain minority workers even when maybe they should be fired. | ||
They're not going to be because it's more important to them that they have this diversity. | ||
So right now across the corporate world in America, There's a very deliberate policy of locking out white people, keeping white people out. | ||
It's happening in academia. | ||
It's happening in the corporate world at an astonishing rate. | ||
And yet, people have no idea. | ||
They don't realize. | ||
And even the people that are subjected to this have a hard time wrapping their minds around it. | ||
And the outcome of this can be horrifying. | ||
Again, is this something else you think people are waking up to? | ||
I think people are less awake to this than they are even to immigration. | ||
I think the average white guy in this country will be fired from a job for no reason, be replaced by a black woman and have no idea that it had anything to do with race. | ||
How do we get through to people? | ||
Again, just how unfair this attack is and how nobody is being helped by this. | ||
It's literally just a policy of destruction. | ||
Yeah, let's look at the thread here. | ||
If you say that basically white people are being replaced at their jobs, they're being boxed out of jobs, and you say that in a pursuit of diversity, if we take diversity to mean anything non-white, well, there is an endless supply of diversity across the globe. | ||
And basically in Africa, I mean the population is around approaching a billion. | ||
They say by the end of the century it will be four billion conservatively, the United Nations says. | ||
And in the United States, of course, the population is around 350 million. | ||
How much of that is white? | ||
Maybe probably 200 million at best. | ||
And so if you're looking for a policy of diversity, you basically could just box out the entire white working class across the Western world with replacements from the third world. | ||
And so we are looking at the South Africanization of the United States. | ||
If you look at what goes on there, you have what are called white squatter camps, basically entire encampments full of homeless, essentially white people who are not allowed essentially to work in Africa because of the insane DEI policies that they've implemented in South Africa. | ||
And that's what's already come to the United States. | ||
It's just a matter of how oppressive they get and how long they're allowed to carry on. | ||
We even saw today Robbie Starbuck is reporting pretty aggressively on DEI at John Deere. | ||
And I would think that most, uh, American conservatives who don't really have any idea what's going on would of course, assume that John Deere is a great American patriotic organization and, uh, you know, give you money to John Deere. | ||
And then they find out that John Deere is actively not hiring white people. | ||
Uh, I think that would really shake their confidence in that organization. | ||
We've seen the same at Chick-fil-A recently. | ||
Um, and we've seen the same at tractor supply. | ||
So these supposedly Christian and or conservative Corporations are totally all in on D.E.I. | ||
I'd rather call it D.I.E. | ||
It is a policy of genocide. | ||
And if you look up the definitions of genocide, one of them is basically, you know, making it so that people can't, in the native population, can't support themselves and can't eat and feed their families. | ||
That's basically what's happening here. | ||
It's just basically mission creep that we're seeing. | ||
And it has crept into, you know, just every facet of American society. | ||
And at the same time, They're flooding the country with tens of millions of diversities from around the world and making it so that effectively it's an endless workforce for a DEI obsessed company and that's what we're seeing. | ||
And of course most of it's coming from these big You know, multinational, you know, plays like Black Rock and State Street and Vanguard, right? | ||
They value your stock now on how diverse you are. | ||
And that's why I brought up that, like, people will be fired for this reason and not even realize it. | ||
I had a friend that was working at Whole Foods as they were gearing up to be sold to Amazon. | ||
And right before that, he and, like, his whole team were fired, and they had no idea why. | ||
And it was like, and he was like, yeah, they made me train my replacement. | ||
And I was like, well, was it a black girl? | ||
And he was like, yeah, it was. | ||
I was like, yeah, I know, dude. | ||
It's because they want, they're being sold to Amazon. | ||
Their stock price goes up. | ||
Because of the DEI requirements, you're a white guy that's worked there for years and done great work and probably deserved a promotion or two that you missed out on, and now you're just being actively replaced to make the spreadsheet look good, to check all the boxes, because that's what the investors care about, apparently. | ||
So a lot of this is coming down from big finance, and it's happening everywhere. | ||
Novant Health, this is happening in our health community as well, so this is a matter of life and death. | ||
Be honest with you. | ||
At Novant Health, they were sued for the exact reason of firing white people. | ||
The suit notes that in one group, there were seven white male senior vice presidents in 2018, two in 2019, one in 2020, and zero in 2021. | ||
Some were fired without explanation other than coded language that the company wanted more, quote, flair. | ||
You can't fire only the white guys, ran the Wall Street Journal headline after the $3.7 million verdict dropped. | ||
So it's weird because this is illegal, but they're just doing it anyway. | ||
And academia is one of the places where this has been most apparent, where a Supreme Court decision comes down saying, no, you can't hire people based on race. | ||
And the response in the universities is, Well, we're still going to. | ||
We're just going to call it something else. | ||
We're just going to call it, you know, background experience. | ||
But that's what we're going to do. | ||
So they're just doing this and it's it's blatant and deliberate and bad and wrong. | ||
And I don't know why people don't recognize that, Dan. | ||
Yeah, I mean, I think little by little people are starting to hear that, you know, from the normies as well. | ||
They're realizing that they're not getting advancement. | ||
They're not even getting hired in many cases, like you said, and it's always in favor of this diversity agenda. | ||
Of course, diversity globally, it's certainly not, whites are not the dominant population globally, not even close. | ||
So, I mean, it's really just occurring in these Western Western countries. | ||
And, you know, it's a global agenda as well. | ||
And so we see this in Europe as well. | ||
We see it in Australia. | ||
And it all ties into what we've been talking about. | ||
All of these threads tie together right up at the top. | ||
These decisions come from the top. | ||
And as you mentioned, even big finances involved in this. | ||
And if you look at what's going on, of course, in the housing markets and in real estate, of course, big finance has been involved in that for many years and essentially scooping up all of the single family homes that they can while building, you know, just apartment block after apartment block. | ||
I I was recently in Denver and staying out near the airport, and I couldn't believe the size of the Amazon facility there. | ||
And then right next to it was basically all these huge apartment complexes and duplex area, you know, where duplexes and condos and all that. | ||
No single family developments in that area. | ||
And the vast majority of people in these neighborhoods and at the local stores did not look like they were from the U.S. | ||
And so basically, you know, they're importing this new working class, let's say, or welfare class, and they're putting them in the kind of housing that they would be totally fine with, but that most Americans, that's not really how we've lived, you know, traditionally in the past. | ||
America was very much a single family home type of nation until very recently, with the exception of the cities, of course. | ||
But we're watching that all be transformed, and that's not by accident. | ||
Right. | ||
It's delivered, and it's not by choice. | ||
Americans didn't get sick of having a house with a yard and a car. | ||
We didn't get over that and decide that we'd rather live in a hovel or a tiny box like a bug. | ||
That's being forced on us and it's very deliberate and it's being done economically so we're not given a choice. | ||
We're being forced into this. | ||
And then, you know, on top of it all, you've got things like DEI in the Air Controller Union, Aircraft Controller Union, FAA investigating after video shows jetliner aborting landing on same runway as departing plane. | ||
We actually have video of this, dash cam, where you see, you almost see two planes nearly collide. | ||
They got within 700 feet of each other, but it looks even crazier on the camera, on the video here. | ||
But this is, of course, the downstream results of anti-white policies that You know, fired like 700 air tower controllers because they were white, explicitly. | ||
And people see this and they hear us respond to it. | ||
And it's like, they're out there deliberately saying we're replacing and destroying white people and white culture. | ||
And we go, that's wrong. | ||
And they go, what are you, a white supremacist? | ||
We got to get over that. | ||
We got to get over the fear. | ||
We have to advocate for this stuff because it's not white people they're destroying. | ||
It's the ideas that white people came up with, which is like freedom and liberty and self-sufficiency. | ||
That's what they're targeting. | ||
Why people are the scapegoat. | ||
Dan Lyman, incredible work as always. | ||
Borderhawk.news at realdanlyman. | ||
Keep up the good work, sir. | ||
Stay tuned, everybody. | ||
That's going to do it for us at American Journal. | ||
The Alex Jones Show begins in 90 seconds at realdanlyman.news. | ||
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
Infowars.com forward slash show. | ||
Everybody buys the Life Select storable food, which has a 25-year shelf life. | ||
Just in case of an emergency, Frankly, it's cheaper to eat the Life Select storable food than it is to get groceries in Biden's economy. | ||
Then, they don't buy the Alexa Pure water filter in conjunction with the storable food. | ||
My thinking is, like, how are you going to prepare the food if you don't have clean water? | ||
They go hand-in-hand. | ||
You got to get both. | ||
What do you think, Jacob? | ||
unidentified
|
You look at every post-apocalyptic movie in the library, the most powerful person has water. | |
I'm a well driller, so we have actually a pretty sound filtration system, but I recommend to people that can't have the complex system like I have to get the electricity. | ||
Thank you so much for your call. | ||
Super important call, Jacob. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
I encourage everyone listening now to go to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Get the Life Select storable food. | ||
Get the Alexa Pure Water filter as well because you want to make sure that you have the ability to prepare that food with clean, pure water. | ||
Go to InfoWarsStore.com. |