Harrison Smith and Leonarda Jonie dissect the June 27, 2024, CNN debate—rigged with anti-Trump moderators (Jake Tapper, Dana Bash) and DHS labeling veterans and patriots as "domestic terrorists"—while linking Biden’s policies to economic collapse for young Americans, including child tax break removals, CBDC expiration dates, and BlackRock’s housing monopolies. They expose media propaganda, like Disney’s demonization of white men and parents, and vaccine commercials that backfire, arguing these tactics weaken family bonds and fuel state dependency. Comedy becomes their weapon against elite "divide and conquer" narratives, from racial victimhood to feminist power struggles, revealing systemic efforts to erode resilience and silence dissent under the guise of "hate speech." The episode frames a globalist agenda pushing Americans toward financial servitude and ideological surrender. [Automatically generated summary]
government has been framing American patriots as the enemy for decades, and the reason should be obvious.
Those who have been in control of the U.S.
government for generations have no interest in serving the people in accordance to the Constitution or otherwise.
Our country is being destroyed from within, and the rule of law has been weaponized against those who defend it.
Hundreds of innocent Americans have been arrested and thrown in jail because they chose to peacefully protest the 2020 stolen election.
And others, such as Jeremy Brown, a Green Beret who was approached in late 2020 by federal agents trying to recruit him for the Jan 6 false flag operation, was arrested after going public with this information by the same federal agents.
He was put in maximum security prison where he remains to this day, his 1,000th day in federal prison.
Hundreds of innocent Americans have been in jail for years, and several have been tortured.
Much of America is okay with the fact that hundreds are rotting in jail for a peaceful protest.
It's already become the norm.
While it's definitely worth celebrating the release of Julian Assange, the American people have never been more divided.
The Daily Mail reports that more than 40% of Americans think a new civil war will be fought within the next decade.
According to one poll, more than 4 in 10 U.S.
voters say the country is likely to get ripped apart in a second civil war within five years.
And another shows that over 100 million Americans say that civil war is coming.
Based on the recommendation of think tank Policy Horizons, Canada has been preparing for an American civil war, including cyber attacks and grid failures, following the 2024 presidential election.
The soldiers of the New World Order are not going to die easy.
They are apparently willing to spark a nuclear conflict with Russia, and are already writing new laws to bring back the draft.
unidentified
The women have never been required to register for the draft, but that could soon change thanks to lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
The Senate version of the National Defense Authorization Act, which sets out military and national security priorities, would require women to register for selective service.
It concludes, quote, this is a necessary and fair step, making it possible to draw on the talent of a unified nation in a time of national emergency.
Now there are two different versions of this bill, one in the House, one in the Senate, so it's possible women in the draft could get dropped as lawmakers iron out the differences.
Folks, as the latest from Greg Reese, find and share it now at band.video and InfoWars.com. Prison camps for political dissidents in all 50 states. Folks, it's coming.
It's coming one way or another this summer.
Things are going to change.
And we have a lot of information on that.
And it's not just going to be here in America, but around the world.
I think I'm seeing a lot of signals about August.
Let's just say that.
I'll tell you what I've heard and how it corresponds to other things being posted by people in the know.
I think it all happens in August.
So we should enjoy July.
Back on the other side, talk about your daily dispatch, give you a rundown for the debate tonight.
You'll be tuning in, infowars.com forward slash show.
unidentified
It's Thursday, June 27th in the year of our Lord 2024.
And you're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
We'll be back tonight to cover the debate, Biden versus Trump.
We'll give you some, give you a rundown as to what that's going to look like tonight, but I hope you tune in.
Myself, Alex Jones, Owen Schroer, and more covering fact-checking in real time, the presidential debate.
Again, we'll get into what exactly the setup for the debate is.
That's what it is.
It's, it's a setup.
Completely rigged against Trump and we'll explain that in just a second, but he agreed anyway.
Why?
Because it can be rigged.
He's still going to win.
It's like, it's fine.
It's fine.
They changed all the rules.
They just framed everything to be as disadvantageous to Trump as they possibly could, but it's fine.
Everybody's going to win, but he's going to win handily is my guess as to how this is going to go.
We have a lot of stuff to cover today, and yes, I think we are rapidly approaching... I don't know what to call it.
The catastrophe?
The conflagration?
I don't know.
What's the term for World War III and an economic collapse which are designed to take place simultaneously?
The apocalypse?
I think we're like a month from the apocalypse.
Ragnarok.
I'll explain why I think that here in just a little bit.
We do have a lot of stories to cover and I believe we have Leonardo, Leonardo Joni joining us in studio today.
Is that right, guys?
Yes, she'll be in studio with this comedian from here in Austin who has found great success in breaking taboos.
And it's very interesting to see people's response to her comedy.
So we'll be welcoming her in studio a little bit later, but we'll begin today as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks.
Your Daily Dispatch for Tuesday, the 27th of June, 2024.
Biden and Trump face off this week in first presidential debate.
Here's what we know so far about the debate, prep, and more.
President Biden and former President Donald Trump are set to face off in the first presidential debate of the cycle as the nation prepares for a rematch of the 2020 race.
The debate, hosted at CNN's Atlanta studio at 9 p.m.
Eastern on Thursday, is the first between a sitting president and former president, and marks the first debate for both men in the 2024 race as the two cruised to their party's presumptive nominee status without participating in primary debates.
The debate plans came together quickly last month after the Biden campaign said in a letter he was willing to debate his Republican opponent on two occasions ahead of the November election.
In a matter of hours, the two debates had been set for June and September.
The debate settings are a departure from previous matchups traditionally held by nonpartisan commission on presidential debates, which has overseen presidential debates since 1988.
But the Biden campaign said the president wouldn't participate unless the debate was in debate sponsored by the commission due to what it said was unwillingness to enforce the rules during the 2020 debate.
So just to give you a little quick breakdown here, they've done everything they possibly can to rig it against Donald Trump.
The two moderators are deeply afflicted with Donald Trump derangement syndrome, Jake Tapper and Dana Bash, both of whom are rabidly anti-Trump.
There will be no audience, meaning that, you know, when Trump drops a banger, drops a real You know, fantastic line.
There will be nobody to, uh, cheer for him.
They have a setup where they're cutting off the microphones.
If it's not your turn to speak.
They have basically done everything they possibly can to their, uh, are not expected to have opening statements.
Candidates will have two minutes to answer questions.
And apparently Biden's team won a coin toss, which allowed them to determine who gets to make the closing argument or where the candidates stand on stage.
The president's team chose his position on stage, selecting the lectern to the right.
That decision tees up Trump to cap the night with closing arguments.
Again, cutting off the microphone, no audience, deeply anti-Trump moderators and being held at the CNN building in Atlanta.
Yeah, they're rigging it against Trump.
Yeah, they're trying to rig it against Trump.
It's one of those things where it's like, okay, for what, 30, 40, I guess 50 years?
I mean, back in the 60s, they sort of established the debate style for television.
It's been the same ever since.
This year, they decided to change it up though.
This year, they decided to make a couple changes that completely alter the formulation of the debate.
What it's going to be like, just changed a little, just a little bit changed everything.
Why to disadvantage Donald Trump?
Because that's what happens when you bring Trump in.
When Trump gets involved, suddenly the way that things have been done for 50 plus years have to all as all be eradicated and replaced with something deliberately designed to disadvantage him.
But he's still going to win, but he's still obviously going to brutally win.
And it's going to be very fun to watch it.
I think maybe we'll do a little strategizing here, just considering how Trump's team might be preparing him for this.
How Biden's team should be preparing Biden for this is he should have spent the last week soaking in a immersion chamber of brain force ultra.
If you could have an entire, you know, submersion tank just filled with brain force ultra and just soaking it for about a week, this is not medical advice.
But I do think that's what it would take for Biden.
Now, what exactly the pharmacological medley?
That he'll be propped up on tonight is unknown because he refuses to submit to a drug test beforehand, like the Trump team is insisting that they do, but he's not going to.
unidentified
I mean, based on how frail he is, if they drew blood from him, that could kill him.
Just because you want the magic, that is his secret.
They draw blood from Biden.
They put it through the machine and they're like, wait a second, this blood's from a five-year-old.
Wait a second.
This blood isn't Joe Biden's.
This blood is a five-year-old's blood.
How did this get in your veins, Joe?
Yeah, he's propped up on adrenochrome is what I'm saying.
We'll see.
We'll see how effective that is.
I think, I think Trump should go in like, he should dress up like, um, what's his name?
Who's a really gay exercise guy?
That should be Trump.
Richard Simmons.
Dan knows every celebrity I try to think of.
I can never think of the names.
Dan's always like, that's Richard Simmons.
Yeah, Richard Simmons.
Trump should come out like Richard Simmons and just the whole time, you should have those little grandma weights and just be like, don't, don't, don't mind me.
I'm just doing something Biden could never do, doing pushups, standing on one foot, just showing off.
I think you just show off.
It's going to, it, I'm very, I'm very excited for tonight.
I have to be honest.
And it's so funny the way this, uh, story is, you know, it's like, uh, in the buildup to the 2024 race.
How exactly did it put it?
Because it's funny, it's like, it's like they're acting, yeah, as the nation prepares for a rematch of the 2020 race.
Yeah, it's June of an election year, the race is already happening.
The nation prepares for the rematch, like they're acting as if the campaigns haven't started.
if this was any other election year, by the time you get to June, the election has been in full swing for like six months.
It's just funny that they're trying to frame it up like, well, no, the election, nobody's really campaigning right now.
Nobody really campaigns.
I mean, the elections in November, you start campaigning in like September.
We're still gearing up.
We're still gearing up for the election season, gearing up for the campaign.
It's like, no, you people are just, A, scared to campaign.
The Democrats just start, they just can't because Joe Biden can't do public appearances.
And you're keeping Trump locked in a courtroom for the entire time, so you're preventing him from campaigning.
Instead, they're acting like this is all normal and that, yeah, the campaigns really haven't started yet.
It's just June of an election year.
I mean, we're still gearing up.
We're still gearing up for this rematch.
Alright, moving on.
Moving on here.
DHS Intelligence Group views Trump supporters, military members, and religious Americans as domestic terrorism threats.
An advisory board put together by the Department of Homeland Security under the Biden administration made the outlandish suggestion that supporters of Donald Trump, along with military veterans and religious Americans, pose a domestic terrorism risk.
This is according to internal files from the Homeland Intelligence Expert Group, a panel that was established last September on the pretense of providing advice and perspectives on intelligence and national security efforts.
Again, we'll get into this later.
It includes James Clapper and John Brennan, two of just these cartoonishly evil, bald-headed spy masters.
We're just openly lying about absolutely everything, using their influence as secret keepers in the United States government to deceive the public in a variety of different ways.
And now they're, yeah, openly advocating for supporting Donald Trump to be evidence of terrorism.
Not that there's been any terror attacks.
Not that this is the type of thing where there has actually been terror attacks and they're identifying who's carrying these out.
No, that would be normal.
That would be, you know, appropriate.
No, what this is, is there have been no terrorist attacks from Trump supporters.
There's been no threats.
There's no organization.
Something that just doesn't exist.
Trump supporter terrorist.
So what they're saying is that supporting Trump is terrorism.
You don't have to do anything else.
You don't have to actually attack anybody.
You don't have to actually commit violence.
You don't have to actually terrorize anyone or do anything objectionable or illegal at all.
It's voting for Trump makes you a terrorist.
Supporting Trump makes you a terrorist.
If you give Trump money, well that's, you know, financial support of a terrorist group.
And I'm not, I'm not, I'm not joking, by the way, that's not, I mean, no, that's actually what they're putting into law and working on that assumption.
And then you combine that last story with this, 100 Biden laptop liars sold out their country while working for the CIA.
So this is an interesting development because last year in April of 2023, it was revealed that Former CIA Chief Mike Morrell, who set this whole thing up, who got the whole letter, you know, writing campaign in motion, where 51 intelligence agents, former, I'm sorry, 51 former intelligence agents.
Let me, let me be clear.
51 former members of the intelligence community.
Sorry, that's the way I should put it.
wrote a letter that they knew to be total blatant lie, discrediting the Hunter Biden laptop, giving big tech the excuse they wanted to do what they wanted to do anyway, which was censor this story as it was bad publicity for their preferred presidential candidate.
This guy, Mike Morrell, who set this whole thing up, got this whole thing going, as the New York Post puts it, prostituting his credibility in hopes of snagging a plum Biden admin job.
Well, we found out that in April of last year, Morrell was questioned and we found out that Anthony Blinken himself was the impetus to the letter.
It was a conversation between Blinken and Morrell that started this whole campaign, this literal disinformation campaign.
Talk about disinformation.
I said this yesterday on The War Room, but when you hear the term disinformation, They want you to associate that with like us telling the truth.
So like when we talked about vaccine passports coming, that was a disinformation campaign up until the moment that they instituted vaccine passport protocols.
When we talk about the danger of mail-in balloting and how it was totally insecure, they called that a disinformation campaign.
And then they used their claim of that being a disinformation campaign to not investigate claims of fraud because they, in a sort of weird reversal of the timeline, basically we said, hey, this doesn't look secure.
There's going to be fraud.
And they said, that's disinformation.
You're a liar that's missing disinformation.
How dare you?
You're removed from the internet.
And then when there was fraud and we pointed it out and go, look, this is fraudulent.
See this graph with the spiking with the straight up with a hundred thousand votes for Biden and none for Trump counted in the middle of the night, the ballot, the pallets of ballots with no source and signatures that don't match.
Like when you point out the fraud, they just point back to where they claimed your prediction was disinformation.
And they say that you're pointing out of the fraudulent, the evidence of fraud itself is disinformation.
And they're able to discredit and ignore the evidence on the basis of their fraudulent claim.
It's all very stupid.
It's all very stupid.
That's what they want you to think of as disinformation.
If you want a real example of what a disinformation campaign looks like, this is it.
This is maybe the most blatant campaign of literally a literal disinformation campaign.
We've got a candidate or rather the one of the campaigns for president, the head of that campaign, Anthony Blinken, reaching out to a serving member of the CIA person in the CIA.
Giving them a hint and a nudge and a suggestion.
Hey, there's this piece of negative press about Joe Biden out there.
Maybe the intelligence community wants to get together and write a letter calling it Russian disinformation.
It's not.
It's not.
Russian never was.
They knew it never was.
And so then they write a letter, get 51 people to sign it, publish it to the media, calling the laptop a Russian disinformation campaign, but doing it in a way That was subtle and as we point out often with the media, technically true.
Because what they said exactly was, it has all of the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.
Knowing full well that again, this would give A, the excuse for big tech to censor, you know, Trump's campaign by claiming, well, we can't help, we can't be a party to Russian disinformation.
So we better silence this, this, you know, the New York Post better cancel their account on X or on Twitter at the time.
Not only that, but of course it gets picked up by the media, who gets the message that the intelligence agencies wanted them to get.
That being that the Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.
And now that it's been revealed not to have been disinformation, that it was revealed to have been true the entire time and the information on the laptop to have been factual and accurate the entire time.
They go back and they say, well, we never said it was Russian disinformation.
We said it has all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.
See, I didn't technically say it.
These little games they play.
This is a disinformation campaign.
And And this disinformation campaign has been carried out by the same people that are, as we speak, weaponizing the intelligence community, weaponizing the federal government to destroy places like InfoWars for spreading disinformation.
Despite the fact that everything we say proves to be true, everything they say proves to be false, and it's proven that they knew it was false at the time they were saying it.
See, people are liars and they run our country.
Pretty incredible.
And the sort of big twist today.
So we found out in April of 2023 that it was Anthony Blinken that called his good friend Morel and said, hey, you know, there's this Russian, there's this laptop.
It sure looks like Russian disinformation.
Now, I'm not telling you that the CIA should, like, write a letter with, like, 50 former intelligence and, like, send it to the media calling it a Russian disinformation campaign.
I would never suggest you do that.
I would never suggest you do that.
I can't.
I can't suggest you that you do that.
So I'm not.
I'm not going to suggest that you write a letter.
50 people get 50 people to sign it, send it to the media, they'll run with it and censor this story.
So I'll never suggest that.
So that's how it started and we found that out a year ago.
The latest thing that we've discovered is that the people that signed the letter We're still in the CIA and that the CIA top brass knew about the letter and allowed it to be sent out despite knowing its contents to be fraudulent.
So this has taken it from a cabal of former intelligence community members working in tandem with the presidential campaign of Joe Biden to bury accurate reporting about his corruption Which is bad enough already.
But it's even worse when you understand that the CIA itself, people active in the CIA and the top brass of our primary superlative domestic spy agency, was working hand-in-glove with the media to silence and shut down a presidential campaign in favor of another.
So just so we're clear, we've got the intelligence agencies empowered right now in Washington DC, the federal government's infinitely empowered spy state, actively engaged in subverting the presidential election in 2020.
Just so we're perfectly clear.
That's treason.
That's the death of democracy.
That's rule by obscure, opaque, mystical intelligence agencies.
The spy state.
So we've moved from a democracy to a spyocracy.
And of course, as we've discussed many times and proven through the history, the intelligence community so-called is in fact an international construct.
There is nothing patriotic about the intelligence community.
They serve their own interests in the interest of the globalists.
Moving on here.
Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system under threat from Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Now, many countries are issuing warnings to their citizens in Lebanon to vacate that country as quickly as possible.
Germany, the Netherlands.
I know Russia has just joined in on that as well.
Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system is a target for Hezbollah.
And in the last week, Hezbollah's leaders warned that if war erupts, then all of Israel would be under threat.
Quote, the enemy knows very well that no place will be safe from our missiles and drones, says Hassan Nasrallah on June 19.
Now they do seem to be preparing in a very real way for war between Israel and Hezbollah.
Israel cannot defeat Hezbollah.
This is admitted by their own intelligence community, by their own military analysis.
But they are going to do it anyway.
And I expected it to be happening pretty imminently.
The latest information I've received is that it'll happen in August.
It'll happen in August.
Just remember we told you so.
Infowars.
Tomorrow's news today.
August.
Financial collapse and Israeli invasion of Lebanon.
Still to come.
And finally we have this.
Bolivia coup attempt.
General arrested as Luis Arce faces new crisis, led by a top general vowing to restore democracy.
Armored vehicles rammed the doors of Bolivia's government palace Wednesday in what the president called a coup attempt, and quickly retreated, the latest crisis in the South American country facing a political battle and an economic crisis.
Within hours, the nation of 12 million people saw a rapidly moving scenario in which the troops seemed to take control of the government of President Luis Arce.
He vowed to stand firm and named a new army commander who immediately ordered the troops to stand down.
Soon the soldiers pulled back along with a line of military vehicles, ending the rebellion after just three hours.
Hundreds of Arce's supporters then rushed the square outside the palace waving Bolivian flags, singing the national anthem and cheering.
I think we'll take your calls on this because I haven't looked into this very much.
I mean, a couple years ago when RCA was being elected, I remember looking into what was happening in Bolivia with former leftist President Evo Morales and all this, but I haven't looked into it in a while.
I'm sure our audience out there has more understanding of this than I do, so we'll go out to you for that.
What other broadcast looks this good, sounds this good, has this information?
InfoWars is like nothing else the world has ever seen.
And we thank you for going to InfoWarsStore.com to support our mission here, which is, I remind you, a worldwide endeavor.
My mom just did a little tour of Italy, a little Rick Steves jaunt, see some art.
And she was talking about staying at an Airbnb with the family on the last leg of her journey and she was like, the dad, he was probably, he was like my age, he was like six or something.
He's like you she tells me you and you and your dad would have would have loved having a conversation this guy.
He's telling me about Blackrock.
He's telling me the world is owned by all these, you know corporations.
He's asked me if the moon landing was real like all this sort of stuff.
And maybe it's just an Italian thing every Italian person.
I've ever met like in Italy people that I met while traveling there.
They're all like super political super tuned in and have a sort of global perspective on all of it.
And obviously America sort of dominates global politics in general.
In fact, it was a Italian guy who told me, you know, the joke America sneezes and the world gets a cold.
And so they pay attention to American politics quite a bit as well.
But it's just it's it's fun remembering that this is not an American thing.
It's not a white person thing.
It's not a Any one group thing, one nation thing, it's a global thing.
This is a global operation they're trying to carry out, and around the globe, people are waking up to it.
Around the globe, people of every race, color, and creed who speak every language you can imagine are all learning about globalism, are all learning about the various corporate cabals that control everything.
The World Economic Forum, BlackRock, These organizations, their nefarious activities, the way in which they have undermined legitimate political causes, started wars to serve their ends, carried out terrorist attacks, waving a false flag to terrify people into obeying.
It's fun.
It's fun knowing how widespread this is.
There's Mr. Napoleon in New Zealand putting up a billboard of InfoWars.
Obviously, we have a lot of great support from Australia and elsewhere around there.
We've got listeners in Pakistan and the Middle East and Italy and all over Europe.
This really is a global Awakening taking place right now, and it's and it's just fantastic to see so even if they're not watching us in particular You know I hope that People living in the United States with family in Italy are I hope you're sharing this information I hope you're translating it to your own language and sharing it making your own shows and rebroadcasting The stuff we talk about here.
Doing your own research.
Coming to your own conclusions.
Learning more than we know.
And sharing that with your friends and family.
Because we need as many people as possible on this train and we will free the world from the grasp of those that want to imprison it.
Imprison the world.
And InfoWarsStore.com is where you go to support this mission.
And international delivery is available.
I remind you.
I have a lot of videos to show you here today.
In fact, maybe I should maybe I should go to this Tucker clip first.
Since it is sort of it has an international character to it.
And this video went totally viral.
A lot of people celebrating it.
Simon Ateba posted saying painful Tucker Carlson demolishes brainwashed liberal Australian journalists in explosive confrontation.
I agree, what he does here is very effective, but I think he misses the mark.
I think there's part of this response that reveals an underlying psychology that people in America have been saturated with, but that we have to break free from.
And I'll explain on the other side.
But first, here's Trump utterly stomping a reporter in Australia, I believe.
Let's watch clip number 11.
unidentified
So you talked a little bit about immigration and in the past you've talked about how white Australians, Americans, Europeans are being replaced by non-white immigrants in what is often referred to as the Great Replacement Theory.
You actually can't say it because I didn't say it, and I don't believe it.
And I'm telling you that to your face, so why don't you just accept me at face value.
My concern is that the people who are born in the country are the main responsibility of its leaders.
And as noted earlier, when those leaders shift their concern from the people whose responsibility it is to take care of, to people around the world, to put their priorities above that of their own citizens, that's immoral.
And they are being replaced in my country, people who were born in the United States.
And the birth rate tells the whole story.
They're not at replacement rate.
And so the U.S.
population is growing because we're importing people from other countries.
And my view is that happy people have children, and a functioning economy allows them to do that.
And we don't have that.
And so you need to fix the economy and fix the culture and make it so that people who want to have kids can.
You don't just go for the quick sugar fix of importing new people.
But of course you are suggesting, and I must say one of the reasons people don't like people like you in the media is that you never say exactly what you mean.
Your slurs are all by implication and you're about to tell me the Great Replacement Theory is racist or anti-Semitic or whatever.
I've said what I've said to you right now like a hundred times in public.
I hope to, if I live long enough, say it a hundred more times.
I think it's completely honest and real, not racist or scary.
It's factually true.
It's not a theory.
It's a fact.
And your, the whole point of your question was to be like, you're a scary racist.
And my response is, no, I'm not.
Okay.
Well, how about no more lying in your questions and then I'll answer it.
Okay.
unidentified
Um, this is the same theory, or as you say, idea, that has inspired the New York Buffalo shooting where- Oh God, come on!
It's also inspired- It's not- First of all- It's inspired one of the worst Australian guns of all time- How do they get people to be stupid in the media?
Look, I'm sorry, I've lived among people like you for too long, and I don't mean to call you stupid, maybe you're just pretending to be, but I've never... I'm totally against violence.
I'm totally against the war in Ukraine, for example, which doubtless you support.
And like all dutiful liberals, support more carnage.
I don't.
I hate mass shootings, actually.
Nothing I said... What does it mean to inspire something?
My views are not bigoted against any group.
They're honest.
They're factual.
That's not hate.
That's reality.
And my views derive from my deep concern for Americans, actually.
Americans aren't having kids because they can't afford to.
And nobody in charge cares!
And so that's my position.
That doesn't inspire mass shootings.
How dare you try to tie me to some lunatic who murdered people?
How dare you, actually?
And in fact... I mean, do you know what I mean?
I mean, like, you know, Hitler wore those shoes.
A lot of people are saying that you're like Hitler.
Can you explain those shoes?
Hitler wore exactly the same shoes, and you're like, I've got nothing to do with Hitler.
That's how I feel about your absurd, disingenuous question.
He's exactly right about everything that he's saying.
And there's a couple things going on.
Obviously, there is the flailing attempt to basically say you're not allowed to talk about reality.
Well, you are allowed to talk about reality, but you have to be in support of the program of destroying white people.
You can talk about it still.
You can sit there and like Joe Biden say, you know, here's the trend of the graph and, you know, white people are going to be a minority and there'll be a minority forever.
And that's a good thing.
As long as you add the, and that's a good thing, then you're, you know, progressive and brilliant.
If you say exactly the same thing, but say, that's a bad thing.
Now you are responsible for mass murder.
Yeah.
That's the stretch they're trying to take it to.
Of course, You know, you could do this with anything, and some accusations like this would be applicable, right?
If you actually point out that people in the public sphere do issue violent, you know, calls for violence.
You do have people saying this sort of stuff, saying that, you know, violence, you know, speech is violence, but some murder is okay.
Some murder is good.
Telling trans people you're under a genocidal threat from Christians.
And then you can point to, you know, trans mass shooters that reflect these exact thoughts in their manifestos.
You could do that.
This person never will, obviously, because it's not about that.
It's about demonizing the ability for white people to oppose their eradication.
That's really what it's about.
So I don't blame Tucker at all because he's exactly right.
And she's like, you've talked about whites being replaced by non-whites.
And he's like, no, I haven't.
Because he hasn't.
Because that's the truth.
He's like, no, I'm talking about native-born Americans.
Black, white, whatever.
It's American citizens that are being screwed over.
And he's right, and it is, at the end of the day, about an attack on nationalism, about an attack on our national unity, and about an attack on everybody in the United States who was born and raised up with the foundational beliefs and is, you know, contributing members of our society.
That being said, however, You can tell that, you know, part of this is informed by sort of buying their setup.
Operating on a landscape that they have established.
So when she's like, you've talked about whites being replaced by non-whites, he's like outraged and offended that she would suggest that.
That's what we need to get over.
There's nothing outrageous or offensive about responding to their attacks.
They are explicit about targeting white people.
And if they're explicitly targeting white people, it's okay to explicitly defend white people.
It's not that complicated.
And the problem is that there is a, it's almost a warped form of like white supremacy where There's this underlying thing that's like, oh, I can't talk about white people or I'll make the non-white people feel bad about themselves.
White people don't need defending.
All these other groups, they need defending.
Because I guarantee you, if there was an African country that was having its population replaced by Europeans, and the Europeans who were replacing them were going, we are going to replace the blacks, and the blacks will be a minority, and they'll be a minority forever.
And that's a good thing.
I guarantee you, Tucker Carlson and everybody else outraged at this rhetoric would defend black people explicitly.
You're targeting black people to make them a minority in their own country?
That's bad.
These black people deserve to be there.
For some reason, when it's white people, they feel like guilty about saying that same thing.
No, if the attack is explicit, the defense can be explicit.
It's fine.
It's okay.
The strange thing is non-white people aren't like You know, consumed by this weird inverted white supremacist guilt.
You know what I'm saying?
Where it's like, it's like, well, Asian people have to defend themselves and black people have to gather and be represented as a group and Mexican people stick together.
And that's a good thing.
That's a source of their strength, but not white people.
No white people.
If white people get together, Ooh, we like, we kind of out-compete everyone.
So we can't do that.
We can't, we can't have white, you know, identity because, well, we're too strong.
We're just too strong and good and powerful.
So I would never suggest that.
Like, there's a weird sort of, like, basically what I want to say is like, you're not special white people.
You, you're 10% of the world population.
You owe nothing to the other 90%.
And you can be destroyed.
There's nothing stopping that.
In fact, there's lots of things pursuing that goal.
White people have this idea that we have to just not participate in the racial stuff, even though we're constantly attacked because of our race.
We are above that.
We're beyond that.
We're setting the example as the good white people, and we'll just show everybody the way.
Again, I get why he did it, because that's not how he phrases it, and she's phrasing it in a dishonest way, but he's still taking on her premise that it's bad to say that sort of thing.
The way I'd respond would probably be like, well, I've never said that.
If I was Tucker, I'd say, well, I've never, I've never said that.
I'm talking, I talk about replacement of not, of, you know, native born Americans.
Why is that happening?
Is that happening?
You said it's happening in Australia, Europe, and America.
White people are being replaced.
Is that what you're saying?
Put it back on her.
Why'd you bring that up?
I never said that, but somehow you think that that's happening.
Is that because it's happening?
Is that because it is actually happening and you know it?
And you just want to shame me out of defending myself or my people?
This is ridiculous.
We gotta get over this.
Again, it's not about white supremacy.
I've explained it a million times.
Just like saying, yeah, my family is my family, and I side with my family over other people's families, doesn't mean I hate other people's families.
Just, this is my family.
So, that's my priority.
That's my people.
That's just how it works.
We're going on to clip number six.
Because this is a newly elected member of parliament in South Africa.
Not making it very obscure, not beating around the bush.
He's pretty clear about who he's targeting, who he hates, who he wants dead.
Let's go to clip number six.
unidentified
For each one person that has been killed by the Texas industry, we'll kill five white people.
For every one black person who kill, we'll kill five white people.
Who kill one of us, we'll kill five of you.
We'll kill the children, we'll kill the women, we'll kill anything that we find on our way.
Here is Matt Baker, who can be followed on X at Slave2Liberty.
I believe that's his—I'll get the exact account here.
But here's Matt Baker on the U.S.-Mexico border just outside San Diego.
unidentified
I can't apply for anything of that.
They come to United States, they get free food stamps, they get free medical, they get housing.
You think that's fair?
I do not think it's fair.
Of course not!
And stupid, I mean, I'm so mad at the president because I told one of the border patrols, you know, they used to sit up there and they used to see all these people jumping.
And I was so mad I went up there and I said, Aren't you guys going to stop these people?
Oh no, it's the President's order that we need to let them come.
Who, Biden?
That's what they said!
And everywhere I went, they said we can't do nothing because it's an order from President Biden that we should let these people come through.
And you're... I mean, I'm just sorry, because the people who are watching this are going to be like, I can't believe that you on the other side is actually having a problem with the same situation that we are.
But yeah, if we complain about it, we're called racists, you know?
Meanwhile... I'm not racist!
No, no, we're called.
You're on the other side.
You're okay.
You have a protection border.
But what I'm saying... No, I hear you.
I hear you.
Same.
Yeah!
Woo!
That makes me reporting live from the post-apocalyptic order wall!
With Coyote!
Oh my god, that was fun.
Oh god, I'm awake now.
So, like, you know, when it comes to having a wall or whatever, I feel, personally, my theory is, is it's because they're dangling that carrot of all the free stuff, that's what's causing the people to come.
It's like if they weren't saying you get everything for free, the people wouldn't be coming, right?
Exactly!
So it's America or Biden's fault, right?
Exactly!
That's the way I feel.
Because that's what all the border patrols that I talk to and I complain to, they say they can't do nothing about it because it comes from the president.
And I said, oh, but it's okay for us that have papers and we get money.
It's okay for him to take money from my Social Security so I could pay for my Medi-Cal, but all these people are getting free?
You know, I mean, yeah!
There's only so much money, and there's like literally homeless people living on the streets of San Diego, homeless veterans, who like fought for the country, and they don't get a house, but someone breaks the law, comes across the border, and all of a sudden they get the red carpet, they get everything free, everybody's kissing their ass, they're like this... Exactly!
It's like they're God or something, isn't it?
Yes!
Yes!
What is the deal?
Why do you think this is happening?
I don't know.
I really want to know that the president would give a good answer to this.
You know, why is he letting all these people come to United States?
Who do you think he works for?
I don't want to say.
Say.
I think we all know.
I would like you to tell me.
No, I'm not going to repeat.
I don't want the president from Mexico sending someone over here knocking on my door because I said something that, oh, we shouldn't be opening our mouth.
I don't want to get you in trouble, but I would love to hear the end of that sentence.
Do you think he's working for Mexico?
Of course!
I don't know what he has with the Mexican president that he has to let all these people come across.
What do you think about the new president?
She just started.
She just started.
I don't want to say bad things about her.
I just... I heard a lot of people that said bad things ended up not alive.
We're going to sort of return to the topic that Tucker was discussing as he was laying out the truly baffling, inscrutable, unjustifiable position of American and European governments that at this point Pretty much continuously announced that they despise their host populations.
Like they despise the native people of the governments that they supposedly represent and do nothing to help them.
And again, I sort of explained this yesterday on The War Room a little bit, but one interesting thing that has happened because of the conflict between Israel and Gaza is that it's sort of thrown back the curtain On what's really, like, it's easy to see what a failure the U.S.
Congress is and think that it's because they're incompetent, because they can't get anything done, because the whole system is too tangled and messy.
But then, you know, Israel needs a couple billion dollars.
They're unified, they're doing things that are massive and consequential, right?
Anti-Israeli protests happen on college campuses.
I mean, they're having hearings.
They're demanding the presidents of the colleges come, you know, answer to them.
They get fired if the answers aren't good enough.
I mean, this gets done in a flash.
It's like they act with a rapidity that you would never expect, with an efficiency that you didn't think they were capable of.
No, it turns out they're capable.
No, it turns out they can do it if they want.
They don't want to, is the thing.
They have no interest in doing anything for the American people.
So it's interesting because when it comes to, you know, like the TikTok ban, Trump tries to get the TikTok ban a couple years ago because it's Chinese spyware and it gets, it gets, uh, You know, deconstructed, and committee, and there's debates, and we can't stand on one side or the other, and this seems really like overreach.
Big Tech's gotta be able to operate.
We can't have the government interfere with... And then it's like, well, actually, AIPAC says that they're anti-Semitic, and they're like, well, ban it.
Well, we'll come together to ban it.
Emergency meeting.
Tonight.
We're banning it.
Everybody get here.
We're voting.
Tonight.
And they're all like, yes, sir, we're coming.
We're on the way.
Time to flex our incredible power, our unlimited influence in America.
We will deploy it immediately.
Israel's reputation is on the line.
So it's sort of destroyed.
It's demolished this perspective of like the intransigence, the stuck-in-the-mud character of Congress.
It's not real.
It's fabricated.
They can do things for us.
They don't want to.
Because when they want to do things for people, they do it.
They have incredible power and they're not afraid to use it when it's their donors, when it's their APAC handler telling them to do it, when it benefits a foreign nation.
They're extremely competent.
Isn't that interesting?
It's only when it's something for American, for the American people that, oh, suddenly it's, uh, this process is complicated and people are, you know, it's the Republican Democrat divide.
It's impossible to bridge.
It's, you know, all these roadblocks and barriers doing anything for us.
It's a choice.
It's a choice they're making and that's been exposed in a real deliberate fashion over the last couple of months.
So when Tucker Carlson is talking about how the American people aren't having enough children to replace themselves and they're bringing in foreigners and that young Americans of every race, color, and creed are finding themselves disadvantaged and put upon and suffering under the immense burden of having to support people who are from a different country, who have been born and raised and are citizens of a foreign nation coming across the border,
and they're getting their apartments paid for, their child care and they're getting their apartments paid for, their child care paid for.
They're getting job training and job offers.
The jobs themselves are paying for lawyers to argue that they should receive asylum and can be retained here forever.
They're getting cell phones.
They're getting checks.
They're essentially immune from prosecution, it seems, as they're arrested for attacking cops and let out the next day.
It is egregious.
It's in your face.
They're setting up a system to where doing the right thing is the stupidest thing you can do.
Behaving correctly, not taking advantage of other people, producing things, being productive, being non-criminal.
You're an idiot.
Like, they're setting up a world where doing that makes you an idiot.
Because all the people not doing those things, they're not suffering any consequences.
They're rewarded.
They're rewarded for breaking the law.
They're rewarded for not participating.
They're rewarded for not contributing.
It's completely, it's an inversion of the construct of our society and our system and the reason all of these governmental institutions even exist.
It's a literal inversion of it.
So I want to go to this video.
We'll find who this guy is.
But he's totally brilliant and he breaks down in a very perfect way just how bad this economy is for young people these days.
And we'll explain it more on the other side.
And I was actually, I was going to play this in the first five minutes of this hour because I hadn't, I'd only watched about the first five minutes of the video.
I knew the first five minutes were good.
The whole video is about nine minutes, a little less.
But Matt was censoring it and came in and said, No, you got to play this whole thing.
You can't cut this guy off.
You got to play the whole thing.
So we'll listen to the whole thing here.
We'll get you his name.
We'll comment on the other side.
This was posted on Twitter with the phrase.
This guy is brilliant.
Let's watch.
unidentified
So for the younger generation, you know, they're facing a housing crisis, they're facing a labor market that does have a lot of opportunities, but there's rolling recessions in tech and finance.
So we have this current macro environment that has never been better, but there's still these pockets of pain.
And a lot of people feel like they're never going to be able to retire.
And so considering that current economic environment, how can people still make it out on top at the end?
I mean, I want this to be a Hallmark commercial, but something I'm very concerned about is that I see every economic policy as basically a transfer of wealth from people your age to my age.
Houses cost $290,000 pre-pandemic.
Just four years later, they're $420,000, and interest rates have gone from 3% to 7%.
So we have this really depressing trend.
I just got off the phone with the guys who run Live Nation, I'm like, a lot of your success is not your fault because people your age, a lot of people your age have literally given up saving for a house.
And so now they're spending money on going to see Taylor Swift in Bangkok because they're like, a house is just out of our reach now.
They're not, they're not mating.
They're not having kids because they can't afford it.
60% of people 30 to 34 in 1990 had at least one child.
Now it's 27%.
It's not because they don't want kids because they can't afford them.
Look at the two biggest tax deductions.
Mortgage interest and capital gains.
Who owns homes and stocks?
People my age.
Who rents and makes their money working all day?
People your age.
We'd strip out the child tax credit, which makes it more expensive for people to have kids, but be sure.
We had a 9% cost of living adjustment for Social Security recipients.
So we have essentially, the people who make our laws are a cross between the Walking Dead and Golden Girls.
They're in their 80s, literally the speaker of the house, the minority leader, the two people running for president.
They had kids in the 60s.
So do they really relate to people your age and the challenges you face economically or in terms of technology and some of the issues you face?
I have no fucking idea.
And quite frankly, they think, oh, they hear they know, everybody knows someone who's a Google has made a ton of money.
And just what William Gibson said about the future is true of wealth and prosperity in the United States.
And that is, it's here, it's just not evenly distributed.
So the metaphor of seven companies, you know, the S&P was up 23% last year.
Oh, my God, amazing.
It was seven companies did 60% of it.
And that's a metaphor for the larger economy.
So if you come out, From a great school, get into a great information age economy, get options.
Yeah, you can make a million dollars by the time you're 30.
That wasn't possible when I was getting out of school.
But at the same time, two-thirds of kids who are good kids, who play by the rules, who work hard, don't get into a good school because we, my, me and my colleagues have embraced this rejectionist bullshit positioning where we take pride in turning away 90% of our applicants, which in my view is tantamount to a homeless shelter taking pride in turning 90% of its people who showed up last night.
We won't.
We purposely weaponize housing permits.
And once you own a house, you decide that you're concerned about traffic.
And every year we have a deficit of one and a half million building permits relative to household formation.
And we have big monopolies who weaponize government to ensure that it's harder for small companies to ever get out of the crib.
So there's a lack of employment, high paid employment opportunities.
So what you have is this culture where some people are killing it.
And the rest aren't.
America used to be about the bottom 90%.
You know who doesn't need college and doesn't need government help?
The top 10%.
They don't need it.
They've got rich parents or they're doing well or so they're so talented.
Who needs help is the bottom 90%.
And, you know, this is something I'm passionate about.
I got into UCLA when it had a 76% admissions rate.
This year, it'll be 9%.
It cost me $7,000 in total tuition for all seven years.
And by the way, I graduated from UCLA with a 2.27 GPA.
And what happened?
Berkeley let me into graduate school.
Can you imagine Berkeley letting anyone into graduate school now with a 2.27 GPA?
I mean, we've essentially sequestered Economic opportunity, education and housing from young people.
And what do you know?
They're the most anxious, depressed young generation in history.
So that's the bad news.
The good news is we can fix it.
The incumbents, wealthy and the top 1% will all pretend that it's network issues and globalization.
That is just such bull.
My taxes are way too low.
And your taxes are way too high.
And if a university doesn't grow its freshman seats faster than population growth, it is no longer a nonprofit.
It's a hedge fund sitting, you know, sitting on top of classes for rich donors, and it should lose its nonprofit status.
We should break companies up so there's more people bidding for your talent.
We should make a federal law that any county can be sued if it doesn't if it doesn't issue housing permits that are being applied for faster than population growth.
We need to massively cram a ton of capital, which we have.
Into the pockets of younger people.
Otherwise, they're not going to have kids.
Otherwise, they're going to be very depressed because every day they see thousands of images of all the shit they don't have and all the success they're not reaping.
Because there will be someone who will be a millionaire among your friend group.
And he or she will take to Instagram and then vomit up their inventory of all the shit they have such that you feel worse about yourself.
So we have the worst of all worlds.
We have total income inequality, and then we have social media platforms that rub it in your face.
I think this is the biggest issue, the one piece of data that we have to fix in our society, is that for the first time, a 30-year-old isn't doing as well as his or her parents were at 30, doing at 30.
That's never happened in our country's history.
You look like you're 20s headed to 30, You're not going to be doing well as your parents at 30?
That's never happened.
That's never happened.
And it creates rage and it creates shame.
It's been especially hard on young men because young women are killing it.
Young women are going to college.
They mature earlier.
They have stronger social networks.
More single women in America have homes now than single men.
And men are kind of, you have never seen a group in America fall further faster than young men.
And if our kids aren't doing well, if young Americans aren't doing well, then what is the point of any of this?
Right?
So the bad news is we have real, we have, I think, the biggest problem in the West.
If our young people aren't doing as well as their parents, then what's the point of any of this?
That's the entire point of an economy is that young people do well.
The good news is we've got the hard part figured out.
And that is where you think about prosperity, housing, homelessness, depression, anxiety.
These issues have been addressed in one or more of any number of markets.
There aren't very many homeless people in New Zealand.
The number of young people depressed is really low in Israel because they have national service and they have programs to take care of this.
We can figure that out.
The hard part.
Is figuring out a way to bring together the alchemy of innovation and intellectual property capital that creates the GDP of Denmark in an earnings call five minutes after the earnings call.
NVIDIA added $240 billion in five minutes post its earnings call.
That's hard.
So we've got the hard stuff figured out.
We can figure out how to make the pie much bigger.
We're just really shitty at slicing it up and figuring out where it needs to go.
So I'm hopeful, but I am really sick of incumbents my age electing people who throw up their arms and pretend these problems are not fixable.
And if only young men took more accountability and young people, oh, I have a niece at Google.
She's doing really well.
Get a job at Goldman.
Okay.
Thanks.
Thanks, Nana.
Thanks, Pop-Pop.
It's just, anyway, there's a word salad.
This is something I'm very passionate about.
But I think the intergenerational theft and absolute cramming of the prosperity into the hands of seniors, people under the age of 40 on average are 24% less wealthy than they were 40 years ago.
People over the age of 75 are 72% wealthier.
So that's an economy that's not working.
That's an economy that's been weaponized by rich people.
I think we can address this issue, but it is the fundamental glitch in the system that is the flaw.
It is the immoral, corrupt part of our society right now, is that we come up with excuses to continue to transfer wealth from the young to the old.
And he's obviously, you know, right about what he's saying.
However, you know, some of the commenters under this video, you know, pointed out.
I don't know how to pronounce that, but PDV says he's great at articulating issues, but the top 1% already pay 45% of all taxes.
The solutions aren't throwing aren't to throw more money at the problem.
It's the fact that we've been doing it for decades and it's made things worse.
And it does sound like that guy is.
You know, signaling some.
More so, you know, socialist ideals of The government's responsibility to redistribute the pie to make the distribution more equitable.
And he calls these sort of intractable problems.
The thing you need to understand, folks, is it's all on purpose.
It's all by design.
This is what they want.
It's not a coincidence that their every policy leads to this outcome.
It's also not a coincidence that they say this is their desire, and then the policies that they implement achieve that desire.
In other words, he is lamenting the fact that young men are so much worse off than young women.
Well, what do you think the last decade of demonizing young men has been about?
You think it's an accident that they demonize young men relentlessly for really multiple decades, but especially over the last decade, it has been unrelenting and brutal?
Do you think they wanted young men to do better at the end of that?
No, it was on purpose.
They were trying to destroy young men and they succeeded.
So even perceiving these things as problems to be solved, that's not how the elite see these things.
This is the fulfillment of their desires.
This is the culmination of their deliberate policies.
The destruction of the middle class.
And it's all about this bifurcation, this separation of the ultra elite, rich, wealthy, influential, protected people.
And the vast majority of everybody else not being middle class, but being low, low, low, low, low class.
It's the same thing that's happened with the distribution of sex.
Right?
It's the same thing that happens when you remove marriage as an institution, when you degrade and diminish marriage as an institution.
You have the same sort of unequal distribution, where the top 0.1% of guys get 80% of the girls.
See, we don't need any new formulation.
We don't need any new socialistic, communistic revitalization of our, you know, reimagining of our economy.
We need to remove the things that have been deliberately placed in our economy to bring about This ultimate conclusion.
All of these things are on purpose.
And they tell you it's on purpose.
He laments the fact that small businesses get crushed by regulations, which also contributes to this unequal distribution of wealth.
Well, that's by design.
Go read the lockstep document.
They tell you that the bigger and more unified and more Centralized a corporate system is the more they like it, the better it is.
You think it's an accident that.
You know, over the year that COVID shut down the economy.
You had the middle class losing a trillion dollars in wealth while the billionaire class gained a trillion dollars in wealth.
You think it's a. Accident.
At the same time that small businesses were shuddering by the tens of thousands, Amazon and Walmart were posting record profits.
It's by design.
It's on purpose.
This is the major malfunction of people like this guy.
He's right about just about everything.
His diagnosing of the problem is fairly accurate.
He can see the symptoms and he can tell you how wrong it is.
But he still seems to be stuck in this idea that it's like people don't know what they're doing.
Or that the old people in charge, as he points out, Speaker like Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Speaker of the House, the head of the Senate, the majority leader in the Senate, the president, both presidential candidates, all in their 80s.
And it really puts it in perspective when he says these people had kids in their 60s.
That's wild, right?
And by the way, they've all also been in office since the 50s in some cases.
Or at least the 60s.
And we've talked about this before, how the, the reason why extremists and leftists and socialists and communists are taking power right now is because the, the boomer and older mentality of like clinging onto power for as long as possible.
Meaning that as, as again, he points out when he's like, Hey, all these people are, all these young people are doing what's right.
They're doing what they're supposed to.
They're following the rules and they're left off worse than their parents.
That's never happened in history.
And it's not the kids' fault, because the kids are doing everything right.
The kids are playing along with the system that's been established for them with the expectation that the generation above them is going to hand off power and wealth and influence and retire when the time comes.
But if they hold on to that power and influence and wealth and position greedily, Then the people that are the good kids, their children are sitting there politely going, can't wait till it's my turn.
Sitting there never to receive the coronation, never to get the crown, never to receive the rod of power.
They're just sitting there politely.
I went to school, I got all A's, I behaved myself, but I'm not getting anywhere with this.
Meanwhile, it's the revolutionary Spirit, the people that are imbued with the revolutionary, aggressive spirit that aren't sitting there going, can't wait to be in power.
They're going up and they're seizing the power because they're the revolutionary people.
And of course, the policies that these people pursue are the very policies that got us in this situation in the first place.
So it's a feedback loop where things are only going to get worse and worse and worse.
Of course, he talks about the fact that they've eliminated Uh, you know, tax breaks for people having babies, but social security got its boost, right?
And he also points out, you know, very correctly that people are understanding that they'll never own a home.
So they're spending their money.
He puts it going to see Taylor Swift in Bangkok, right?
What he means is people are spending their money on frivolous, impermanent things because they don't believe in generational wealth and they'll never have kids.
It's a death cult in reality.
It is an exploitative sort of brave new world style.
Spend everything you can now.
Just get your rocks off.
Get immediate pleasure.
Because there is no future.
Nothing to look forward to.
No point in building anything.
Everything's going to go away.
And they'll institute an estate tax anyway.
So, you know, even if your parents do die with a bunch of money, you're not going to get it.
It's going to go to the state, and they're going to funnel it into the programs that brought about this inequality in the first place.
Exactly right.
Brilliant breakdown.
The one thing he's missing is that it's all on purpose.
Actually, just to just to close off this topic, let's go to clip number 14.
Because this will give you a real clear view of the economic situation right now and the reason why people can't save money, the reason why people can't afford houses, can't make the down payment, don't have the credit score capable, choose to spend their money on frivolous consumables rather than anything permanent.
Because it's designed, the economy is designed To do that to you.
It's been purposefully manipulated to drain your savings.
Because they don't want you to have any savings.
They're telling you that.
And they're talking about implementing CBDCs where the money in your bank account has an expiration date.
They are designing systems that make it literally impossible for you to save money or make big purchases.
It's not an accident.
It's by design.
And they lie about the consequences of their policy because they know that what they're doing is bad.
Because they're evil, they still do it.
Let's go now to clip number 11, or whatever I said.
unidentified
I feel like I'll go be sick.
I just, like, looked through my Walmart history, and I found this, like, um, Walmart order from two years ago for the whole month worth of groceries.
45 items cost $126.
A whole month of groceries just for me, basically.
But, I did notice this reorder all button, and I wanted to see how much it would cost now.
Now, this order of 45 items for one month would have cost $414.
In two years, basic foodstuffs, basic grocery and necessities have quadrupled in price.
What did Klaus Schwab say on stage with Joe Biden?
The middle class is the only burial to the false industrial revolution.
Why do you think they're Importing so many people.
You know, Professor Galloway, he was talking about how young people are doing worse than their parents, and that's never happened before, and they are disillusioned at the prospect of ever buying a house again.
Why would BlackRock's buying them up and renting them back at the same price that they would be paying in a mortgage, they'll be paying in rent, but they'll own nothing at the end of it.
It's by design.
It's by design.
You know who is doing better than their parents?
Immigrants.
They came here from third-world countries.
Yeah, they cannot own a house.
They can rent an apartment in America.
They can be paid minimum wage.
They can make barely subsistence living.
And they're still doing better than their parents in the third world, so they feel like it's working for them.
Even though they're living in a standard of living that is significantly lower The Native-born Americans.
So they're bringing in people to replace us Americans who expect to live as good or hopefully better than our parents.
Well, they want to bring in people who don't have that expectation.
We're actually satisfied and happy with significantly lower standards of living.
living.
How people can't see that this is on purpose and by design is really beyond me.
And again, they're literally designing financial systems, you know, central bank digital currencies where It is actually going to be impossible to save because they want everything in the paradigm of the company store.
They want everything impermanent, everything rented.
Do I need to remind you what the World Economic Forum says?
Do I need to say the thing?
When you've got a coalition of the biggest and most powerful corporate, governmental, And non-governmental organization, NGO operatives, the leaders of industry and politics coming together and forming a working group to set policy around the world.
And their overarching design is quote, you will own nothing.
Well, don't be surprised when you look around and nobody owns anything and nobody has any privacy.
Don't be surprised by this.
Don't act like it's an accident.
The problem is not that we have to come up with some new policy because the old ones aren't working.
The problem is we have anti-human psychopaths running the globe and deliberately eviscerating wealth to put you in a state of peasantry where they can lord over you forever.
hour she'll be in studio with us very funny stand-up comedian from austin tonight i will be returning to the studio along with alex jones and owen schroyer i imagine we'll start broadcasting not too much longer after the end of war room the debate tonight begins at 8 p.m Central Time and we'll be commenting and fact-checking it live.
I hope you tune in.
Infowars.com forward slash show.
Band dot video.
And we'll be streaming on X at Real Alex Jones.
That is tonight.
Coverage beginning at 6 p.m.
Please do tune in and make sure to go to InfoWarsStore.com to support us because this is exactly what they don't want us doing.
They're so terrified of the debate tonight, which is hilarious to see.
The headline is, I'm worried about Biden's debate with Trump this week.
You know, I'm kind of worried.
I'm kind of worried about this Trump debate against Biden.
Not that I think he's going to win.
I just think he's going to look stronger.
He says, Trump has convinced many Americans that stridency is a sign of strength, while truth and humility signal weakness.
The projection of these people.
Trump has convinced Americans that strength is strength, while weakness is weakness.
This devious cult leader.
This sweaty old man says, I just turned 78 and frankly I'm scared about what might come down on Thursday evening when the oldest candidates ever compete in a presidential race debate each other.
I'm less worried that Joe Biden will suffer a mental lapse or physically stumble than I am that Biden will look weak and Donald Trump will appear strong.
Oh, you're worried about reality being reflected in the debate?
Oh, you're worried about the strong guy looking strong and the weak pathetic guy looking weak and pathetic?
Well, how observant of you.
He's not worried that Joe Biden will suffer a mental lapse or physical stumble.
Well, have you seen him recently?
You're not worried about that?
Seems like that is the type of thing that makes Biden seem weak and incompetent when his weakness and incompetence is on full display.
He doesn't even have to stumble.
Just look at how he stands there.
Every time he's in public, I'm telling you, man.
People had trouble sleeping last night.
Let's just say that.
People in D.C., people around Joe Biden, spent all last night tossing and turning.
This is the day they have been rewing.
They have been frantically preparing for, knowing that no matter how much they prepare, no matter how much they change the rules, no matter how much they alter the debate setup to be unlike any debate ever had before, it doesn't matter.
They're going to send Joe Biden Out on the stage with Donald Trump.
And this morning, they're doubling up on their anxiety medicine.
They're going to get through this day with the help of, you know, a pharmaceutical cocktail.
Biden and the people around Biden, because they're not confident.
Nobody on the Biden team is going into this confidently.
They're even writing articles about how scared and nervous they are.
Tell you what, if you're this scared and nervous about your presidential candidate, Maybe you shouldn't have him as your presidential candidate.
Maybe this reflects more on you than it does on him.
And one thing about the setup that they've created for this debate, with the mics being muted, with the very strict time limits, with the leftist moderators, who I guarantee you will not have their mics cut off, think about that, right?
Nobody said that the moderators will have to be silent.
I bet they'll be interrupting.
So it's going to be three on one against Trump.
He's still going to win, obviously.
Yesterday, Alex was, um, invoking the imagery of gladiator and that, you know, there's another part of he, he in particular talking about, are you not entertained?
But what about the final fight?
When Maximus gets stabbed in the gut before the fight starts and he still wins.
That's what we're dealing with here.
Trump's fine.
Trump's like, yeah, stab me in the gut.
I'm gonna kick your ass anyway.
But the really interesting thing about this article is is I think it puts on display something that we point out continuously.
And then I don't quite have a phrase for you.
I don't quite have a word for this yet.
But it we see it all the time.
And it's obvious when you do see it.
And it's the way that Leftist liberals, they cannot conceive of a world in which normal people are just concerned about their own lives.
Everything has to be a ploy to them.
Everything the right wing does has to be some underhanded trick they're pulling.
It can't be that people are just seeing policies affect their own lives and then opposing that policy.
It has to be because Trump is tricking them.
He's playing on their racist ideas to push this policy.
They can't just understand, give any credence to, have any empathy with the right wing ever about anything.
He says this, That's a ploy, apparently.
Trump's most successful ploys has been to frame the upcoming election as a contest between strength and weakness and to convince many Americans that stridency and pugnacity are signs of strength while truth and humility signal weakness.
That's a ploy, apparently.
Kind of like when I give money to a cashier, it's a ploy to get the product I want.
It's not a ploy, it's just the way things work, okay?
It's not a scheme, it's not a ploy, it's not a plot, a conspiracy, an underhanded deception.
It's just the way things work.
Alright?
When I hit the print button on my computer, it's a ploy to make the article print out.
It's just a thing that you do.
When you're running for president, you put your strengths up against your opponent's weakness.
This isn't a ploy.
There's nothing dishonest about that, because ploy entails dishonesty.
They, like, cannot conceive of just honest conservative values.
They know what they're doing.
Don't get me wrong.
This guy's not like confused by this.
He doesn't actually think it's a ploy.
He's taking the actual legitimate arguments in favor of Trump being president and twisting it with the assumption and clouding it in the notion that it's somehow dishonest and a trick and underhanded and really it's just that he just hates people.
You know, it's one of those things.
Yeah, working is a ploy for me to get money.
There's nothing dishonest about that.
I work, I get paid.
That's how it works.
When you run for office, you say, I'm strong, that guy's weak.
It's not a ploy, it's not a trick, it's not a deception.
You people are simply incapable of doing anything correctly or understanding the things actual Americans care about.
He talks about all these other people.
He just hates all conservatives, right?
He lists all these conservatives that he finds vile.
He calls them vile.
And it's Senator Joseph McCarthy, Newt Gingrich, Rush Limbaugh, right?
Just decent people who are right about everything.
He calls them vile.
What made them vile to me, he says, was their cynical opportunism.
See?
When you solve a problem, it's not you solving a problem.
It's your cynical opportunism.
You see the problem as an opportunity to fix it.
How cynical of you.
The eagerness with which they exploited people's fears to gain power or notoriety or both all had the character of barnyard bullies.
Exploited people's fears to gain power or notoriety.
In other words, just reflected what people's concerns were in their own lives.
And by virtue of that, got the support of the people who had those concerns.
So long story short, they're literally writing articles about how scared they are about the debate today.
Because they hate you.
unidentified
Russian disinformation tactics.
And one of the themes this election cycle is that Joe Biden is too old to lead.
And so everyone is seizing upon this.
It is a classic disinformation tactic.
And I think the best thing that we can do is to prepare the American people for this false narrative.
They went, oh no, he's beautiful, he's masterful, no one's smarter, he's the best, and if you say he's obviously got cognitive issues, the beginning of onset of dementia, which is now deep, deep into dementia, you are going to be censored and we're allowed to call for violence against you.
All I ever say is the truth in funny ways and apparently you can't do that.
That's inaccurate.
Um, it's just, to me, it's like, that's why so many people complain about the state of stand-up comedy, because right now, the main, for the most part, right, I want to say 90% of the mainstream comedians are just parroting whatever propaganda is being put in front of us.
I mean, Netflix had that comedy special recently, and it was like, uh, trans woman, Pakistani, British, I mean, they listed 17 qualities that they had of their identity before they got to a joke, and then you hear the audience clapping, and you're like, who are these zombies?
Usually the reason that those clips are happening like that is because I'm performing in front of audiences who came specifically for that.
But let me tell you something.
I have done a few shows in New York and it is not the same response.
Yeah, people look at, like, I'll say my punchline.
So, one of my jokes that's online is I say, hey, we got all these migrants at the border, and they're actually African migrants this time.
And everybody says, oh, they're coming for our jobs.
And I'm like, they're black.
It's a funny joke, right?
It's a funny joke because there's this stereotype that black people don't like to work.
And then I say, oh, no, they're coming for our fat white women, which is, you know, I'm just playing on stereotypes, right?
So, and when I usually do the, they're black, there's like a huge laughter and everybody's like, oh, we're not supposed to laugh at this.
I did that in New York, and it was dead silence.
They looked at me like, you racist white bitch.
We're going to kill you.
And another part of it, too, is that, like, for some of this stuff, like, sometimes they're so deep in the propaganda that they don't even get the joke.
And I was in New York, and let me tell you, I was doing Brooklyn rooftop shows, and I had, like, you know, communist afro-punk lesbians who, like, wanted to fight me after the show.
And then there were a bunch of comedians who were just being safe, and they would, after I'd go up, they'd be like, I love you, I get to keep saying what you're saying.
And I'm like, you know, if more of us did it, it wouldn't be a problem.
And so when you're writing a joke, I mean, are you being offensively or deliberately offensive or are you just trying not to worry about it?
Because I have the same thing where I find myself avoiding certain topics and I have to consciously sort of go, you know what, if I'm avoiding a topic because, you know, I genuinely maybe I don't know how to cover it or something like that's fine.
I have to ask myself, am I not saying this because I'm scared?
And if I'm just scared of saying this, I really need to just say it.
So when people say all this stuff about me, I'm like, just relax over there.
And I'd crack these jokes in front of them, they'd find it funny.
Okay, this is before the propaganda set in.
So when I go to write a joke, you know, I'm not trying to be offensive, but I will look at topics that piss me off, right?
So it was the trans agenda, now it's this push to immigrate every possible person from other cultures to kind of water down the American culture and make it much easier to conquer.
And so I write that down and then I think about You know, what are the things I want to say about it?
And then and then how do I make this funny?
You know?
And so that I'm not trying to be offensive.
It just happens to be that that's the way you get people's attention.
And then that's what's that's what's funny.
I mean, stand-up comedy, really good stand-up comedy has been offensive since its beginning.
I mean, you had Lenny Bruce getting arrested because he was fighting the status quo, which is what good stand-up comedy supposed to do.
But if you go in front of the left crowd, if you don't go up there being like, as a woman, being like, I had sex with 17 guys this week, which is just trash, you know, you're just pushing an agenda that seeks to demoralize women, and I think female male relationships in general, then they look at you like rabid dogs.
And, you know, I just think it's, you know, humor is like the ultimate, it's like the nuclear bomb.
It's like the ultimate weapon in doing what we do here, trying to get the truth across, right?
It's the spoonful of sugar that helps the medicine go down.
You can say things in humor that you can't say in other ways.
And when I, if I do a skit or something, or if I'm thinking of something I'm going to say on the show and try to make it funny, I do the same thing you do.
This is my question.
I guess you already sort of answered it.
You start with, okay, what's the idea I want to get across, and then you think how to make this funny.
Or you just sort of see things that are so absurd that they're funny on the face of it.
But when you make a joke, is your main concern, what's the funniest thing I can say, and who cares if it's offensive, or who cares if it has a point, or do you have a point you're trying to say that you then try to make that point funny?
Well, most of the time I think I have a point that I'm trying to say and how do I make that funny, but I do silly jokes that have no point and are just funny.
At the end of the day, I'm a stand-up comedian and I'm an entertainer, right?
But I do think stand-up comedy has this incredibly important role in our society.
And the court jester is supposed to highlight that the emperor is not wearing any clothes, right?
Or the king is dumb, right?
But you're supposed to do it in a funny way or get your head chopped off.
But now, they don't even want you to do it in a funny way.
They don't even want you to highlight the insanity that's going on, because especially if you do it with humor, it is an incredible threat to the agenda.
And there is an agenda.
You have to have your head buried in the sand to not know that there is a global, worldwide agenda to subjugate people around the world.
Around the world.
And they've already done it in a lot of places.
My opinion is America's not free anymore.
And it's precisely because we cannot speak the truth.
Yeah no I completely agree or even just playing on the stereotypes like not being serious like you know when you joke about like what do you mean they're stealing our jobs that all the immigrants are black like it's playing on stereotypes it's funny it you never get the sense like oh she actually hates black people like there's this weird thing where it's like You have to treat everything with kid gloves, you have to be very careful, and everything you say you have to first, you know, set up.
Like, now, before I say this, I want to let you know I don't hate anybody.
It's just exhausting.
Like, why can we not just make these jokes?
They're funny, and if you don't actually believe this stuff, then you should be able to laugh at it.
I mean, I really don't have hate or vitriol towards any group.
And you know, I go hard on some particular groups in my Twitter feed.
Check that out.
But I don't actually say any of it with hate, you know.
And I was surprised.
I had somebody say to me, wow, I looked at your Twitter feed and it's full of hate.
And I was like, it's actually not.
You know, I'm calling out things that I see.
Um, I see a, you know, Zionist controlled government.
I'm calling that out.
I'm calling out what I think are injustices.
None of it says, and we should kill them all.
I don't believe that.
I think that's totally wrong.
And I think we, you know, we each have things that we have to be accountable for, but when we can't say it, then those groups can continue to get away with their agendas.
And there's a big, I think the biggest thing that our media and our government of elites are selling is victim consciousness.
Because it's such an ironic thing.
You sell people that they are the biggest victims of usually white supremacy, right?
Or for the other countries, you're the victim of Americans.
And then Through that victim consciousness, they somehow get foisted to the top of power.
Because I'm such a victim, I have the right to retaliate in these ways that are actually, for anybody else, would be illegal.
Yeah.
And Nietzsche said, you know, Nietzsche said this, he said, you know, he was totally against victim consciousness because he said it's through that that people actually become, you know, get power and become tyrannical.
Like, one of the classic manchas that's put out is white people are responsible for all the evils of the world.
You know, specifically Western Europeans, right?
Then you go look at the facts and you go, actually, they ended a lot of evils of the world.
They ended slavery.
They built civilization.
They go to these other countries that haven't developed and they try to help them get running water.
Now, does that mean they always do everything perfectly?
No.
Does it mean that they are not themselves, you know, prey to being tyrannical or injust to the people they subjugate?
Yes.
But on the whole, in my opinion, if you really study history, not the propaganda you're being given, it is a beneficial effect.
Like, pretty sure all the widows in India who weren't being burnt alive on the pyre of their husband's funeral were not like, oh, I wish the British weren't here right now because I'd really like to die.
It's all just Well, you have to understand that this is literally insane.
People are hypnotized under the propaganda and their emotions are hacked in two ways.
Number one, if you, you're being taught to identify with a victim group, which is why so many young children are saying, so many young white children are saying they're trans or whatever because they go from, if they're just white and they're not gay or any of that stuff, then they are the number one oppressors.
But if they suddenly say I'm trans, bisexual or whatever, they become the number one victim class and they get, you know, absolved of their guilt, right?
So there's two levels of propaganda that are happening.
If you can identify with the victim class, then you get to be the perpetrator.
With no You know repercussions and if you are identified as the oppressor class your emotions get hacked to feel a tremendous amount of guilt You don't even know why but you know, you're supposed to because there's a violent reaction that's coming towards you And so then you don't speak out also and so that way of doing things both ways It has led to this what I think is a communist Marxist state that we're living in.
Yeah, and it's already here Yeah Yeah, that's one of the crazy things about reading the news these days.
It's like, and we're almost, you know, here at InfoWars, like, on the conspiracy side of things, like, we've been warning about this for so long, it's almost like we're having trouble catching up to the fact, like, oh, it's already here.
In the beginning, I was trying to avoid topics that were going to be controversial.
I mean, they would still come out that way, but I was always subverting what I saw as the standard and the people that I saw just parroting the propaganda.
Because I was like, you're just a paid agent of the state and you're goofy.
You're not saying any... Why are you... Here's what I don't understand.
Okay, I have the potential to make tons of money in all different routes, okay?
I could easily take any other career and my life would be so much easier.
I don't like really being in the public sphere.
I really don't because you get this kind of... First of all, you become a target.
Especially when you're standing up and you're against the propaganda.
You become a target, okay?
So I would much rather prefer to live a nice quiet life, make a bunch of money, and be like, to hell with this whole thing.
But, I do have a strong sense of moral justice, and I feel this sense that if nobody says anything, this is going to get progressively worse.
And I understand that I'm going to get the slings and arrows, but The alternative is we're all going to end up in internment re-education camps and then I'll be like, really, why didn't I say anything?
And, and, you know, the flip side of it is that there is this huge audience for this type of content who are sick of the Hollywood crap.
They're sick of the late night shows saying, literally just like saying CIA talking points.
Like it's so, it's also boring.
It's also, I mean, goofy is the right word.
A lot of people say goofy because these people, they take themselves so seriously and they think that they're the They think that they are the resistance.
I know that in order to accept this, you have to shut down critical thinking.
You have to shut down your own internal sense that something's not right here.
And we do this because we know that there is no benefit To recognizing the truth because all that will happen is everybody will turn on you and aim violence at you.
So most people that are on that side know that they don't want to explore what it is because the road could potentially lead to then all of a sudden being on the other side and becoming a target.
And obviously, you know, working at InfoWars, it's all it's all the same stuff.
But I have never want like I get people asking me, they're like, so do you get a lot of like attacks or people like threatening you?
Really, no.
I mean, occasionally, but like, I can't even think of a specific one.
Way, way more is the support.
Way, way, way, you know, it just overwhelms the negative by a factor of a thousand is the positive support you get from people going, thank you for saying this.
Finally, somebody saying it.
Sometimes I think like that's our job on InfoWars.
It's just like, we just got to be the voice for people.
Because people are sitting there listening to NPR, you know, in their car being like, these idiots, they're so stupid.
And it's like, we just want to be your voice.
We just want to let you know that there's somebody else out there that feels like you do.
So, and for sure, you have had a lot of positive feedback.
Listen, I'm so glad you brought up NPR because what a CIA operation.
And they do this thing where the voices are so calm and monotone, so it's almost like a hypnosis sets in.
And it does two things.
Number one, it lulls people so that their consciousness kind of goes down to a receptive mode.
And then in addition to that, because they're like so calm-seeming, it makes it seem like what they're saying is factual and not opinion and propaganda.
And so you're more inclined to accept it.
Total BS.
But yeah, I'm a kind of divide-the-room comedian, right?
It's like, wherever you already stand, you're either going to be a hater or you're gonna be like, like you said, thank God.
And when I do most of these shows, as long as I'm not in some crazy left-wing city that has become a total, you know, communist hellhole, It's exactly what you said.
People will come up and go, oh my god, thank you for saying that.
I've been thinking that.
I can't say it because I'm going to lose my job and all of that stuff.
And I'm like, listen, you're going to lose your job or you're going to lose your freedom.
So I'm thinking I just forget about the vaccine and part of it was sort of joking about like, well, you know, you're going to lose your job if you don't get the vaccine.
And I was showing it to my brother-in-law who had gotten the vaccine because he was going to lose his job if he didn't.
And he was still laughing along.
And at the end, he was kind of like.
That hurt, you know, that kind of hurt.
So it was like he thought it was funny and he got it and he understood it, but at the same time it was like, ooh, you're really striking home there.
Yeah, because it attacked an unspoken assumption that he had and now he would have to face the fact that he betrayed himself and was untrue to what was true for him.
And one of the few things I really enjoy doing still out in the world is going to comedy shows.
It's still something that you can go out and have a good time at night and not be bombarded with nonsense if you pick the right people to go to.
One of the things, like, we were just talking during the break, like, all this, the jokes are, they're silly, they're not to be taken seriously, they're not some legitimate commentary, and it's so funny to me because they never worry about offending us, do they?
I mean, you hear, they're not even joking, they're just saying they're like, all white people's DNA is corrupt and evil and must be destroyed, and it's like, But then you go, then you make a joke about, you know, some stereotype and they're offended.
And you're like, well, you didn't care about offending me when you were making that very serious comment calling me evil.
Most American, most, you know, most real Americans do not get offended.
They kind of laugh it off.
Right, but also you have to remember the reason that's okay is there is an agenda and there is a propaganda and they're trying to get people all on board with that so that they can direct their rage at this one group, Western Europeans, and say they're responsible for every evil in the world.
And the real reason is because everybody does sense that there's injustice in the world.
But the injustice is coming from an elite group of people who've taken over most of the governments, right, and are oppressing people.
And so you have a real rage.
People have a real rage at this.
But if they can direct it to sort of a straw man, then they escape scot-free.
And we saw this after the huge banking crisis in 2008.
People were coming together left and right going, you're not going to bail out these banks.
That's our tax money.
Let them go under.
And they did.
And in order, you saw this right afterward, in order to quell their rage, they did this boosting of racial consciousness, boosting of racial injustice, even though that was clearly not happening.
We had a black president.
Excuse me?
How could you possibly be in a racist country that just elected a black president, which you wouldn't have been able to do unless white people voted for him?
I think Jack Posobiec maybe tweeted a chart the other day that shows the number of times the word racism or racist was used, and you can see it's fairly low for a long time, and then as soon as Occupy Wall Street happens, it shoots up.
And it has each different, you know, Wall Street Journal was like the most.
They just started talking about race constantly.
New York Times started talking about it constantly.
the wall street journal and economic journal goes we're going to focus on it i mean it's right when occupy wall street happens yeah so it's a totally deliberate divide and conquer keep these people separated and fighting against each other and they'll ignore us while we do our nefarious misdeeds but i think it's even worse than you're saying because you know you say they set up a straw man to you know divert people to attack but really they're blaming the guards for the break-in
They're blaming the people like me and Alex Jones who stand up and go, these people are, these are the oppressors, this is the tyranny, these are the people that are exploiting you.
And it is infuriating because you do put yourself out there.
You do suffer slings and arrows.
It's not a joke when we say that.
And it's fine because all we're saying is the truth and it's not like we're going to stop saying it because they attempt to bully us out of it.
But wouldn't it be nice if the people that were ostensibly on our side didn't immediately throw us under the bus for actually trying to do something and come out and say things?
I gotta say, most of the people that are on our side are on our side and have a backup.
But when you have these voices, people need to be very aware that you're being sabotaged by people who are pretending to be part of the cause and aren't.
Like, there was this group of... There was a...
There was an account that was posing as a white nationalist account and then was trying to bring up stuff about me and say, look, this is why she's a fraud.
And I, luckily, because the work that I do, I've had people kind of connect with me who are like plugged in and can really do research.
And I go, can you tell me who runs this account?
And he goes, it's three Nigerians.
Who are totally racist against white people.
And then you had people who were on my side buying it and being like, this is true about her.
I had a bunch— So there was an organized front of people who were claiming to be pro-Ukraine, which were actually accounts that were created under the Obama administration to target anyone on social media who went against whatever the narrative was at the time.
Because I ended up having people look into it and it was most of these accounts were bots.
And then the person that was the ringleader was this total pathetic person.
He tried to like dox me and tell everybody where I was performing and get people to show up to violently threaten me.
And then, uh, turns out he was a total LARP.
He was pretending he was like this military industrial guy.
He was about 50 or 60 pounds overweight, balding, had never accomplished anything in his life.
I knew exactly where he worked, and I was going to go ahead and put all that out, but I was like, you know, I don't, I wanted the, everything to die down, but that guy deserved to be doxxed himself, and I knew who he was.
So I messaged him back and said, here, here's all your information that I have.
If you'd like, I can get all my followers to know who you are, because they're a little bit more diehard than your fake bots.
And again, it is deliberate, and it's a policy that they're pursuing, and it definitely has an impact, especially the dad being dumb thing, or the parents being dumb in general, because it's not just the dad.
And I know Disney was on the forefront of this.
Yes.
Disney Channel wasn't really around when I was a kid, but by the time I was in high school and stuff, my friends' little sisters would be watching it.
And you're sitting there watching it, you're going, oh, all of the parents are stupid and all of the kids are brats, but they're right and cool and good.
And so when the parents try to do something, the kids go, no, idiot, it's this way.
And the crowd cheers.
And that's you're teaching the kid to disrespect their parents and think their parents are stupid and think that they know more than them and to disrespect and ignore them.
And it's like then you see the behavior of the kids mimic what they see on TV.
And suddenly all these little siblings of my friends are like the biggest jerks you've ever met.
And they're self-centered and self-important and they think they know it all.
But before I joke about it, I have to go through this fit of rage and vitriol, which my poor fiance's got to hear about because I'm like foaming at the mouth.
They'll, like, go protesting for BLM, and then other people will be like, well, this is one of the good white ones.
And you're like, You're such an idiot, dude.
You know how much money you could have gotten?
It's like when people... Right.
It's like when they were giving people a donut to get the vaccine, and I was like, if you're gonna poison your body, at least get a bunch of money that's gonna pay for your medical bills down the line.
Bill de Blasio, when he did that commercial, and he's like... It literally... Yeah, to me, it was like...
It was one of those, like, infomercials you see at 3 a.m.
with the psychics when they're so bad at acting.
He's like, you know, because what they're trying... I imagine all the people who created that info, this, like, script for him, were like, oh, my God, he's totally ruining the propaganda.
Because we're trying to associate deliciousness with a poisonous vaccine, and he's literally saying it out loud.
And the weak cannot lead, and therefore they can continue their agenda.
I mean, I say this all the time with male-female relationships with feminism.
You've got these women being empowered with this idea that they are the victims of the patriarchy all the time.
And so they've got this vitriol towards men, right?
They need to have the power.
They're oppressed or whatever.
The patriarchy is holding them down.
And then they ignore the facts.
That the patriarchy has protected you against swarths of criminals and villains who would like to rape you and have their way with you, but you have strong males protecting you against that, and so you're claiming all this stuff, and then here's what happens.
A lot of women do have the power now, and they are the boss bitches, and they're deeply unhappy.
That's another way of saying it's a non-zero-sum game.
When you have a sum game, it's a pizza, there's only so many pieces, it doesn't get bigger.
But if something is symbiotic, if something empowers everybody involved with it, it is a 360 WIN.
When you visit drjonesnaturals.com, you're not just supporting our broadcast by getting the products, you're getting game-changing products that really, really work and are amazing.
All of the NanoSilver products, incredible products like Next Level Foundational Energy, products like Top Brain, an incredible Nootropic, Rocket Rest, an incredible Natural Sleep Aid, and dozens of other products not available at InfoWareStore.com or exclusively available at DrJonesNaturals.com, and they keep the show on the air, and they're amazing, a 360 win.
So please, follow the links below to DrJonesNaturals.com, and I thank you for your support.