Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 5, 2024 - American Journal - Harrison Smith

02:24:29

The American Journal: WSJ Admits Joe Biden A Dementia-Ridden Puppet - FULL SHOW - 06/05/2024

Source

Participants

Main voices

harrison smith

01:51:05

Appearances

greg reese

04:36

matt gaetz

03:08

matt infowars

02:38

merrick garland

01:13

Clips

alejandro mayorkas

00:58

alex jones

00:50

thomas massie

00:23

Callers

icarus in wisconsin

02:43

tim in california

01:00

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
greg reese ▲ ● ▼		Started in the 1400s, the Russian monarchy was based on the second letter to Thessalonians, where Paul speaks of a restrainer who holds back evil.
		As long as there was a Christian czar on earth, the dark powers of the Antichrist would not come to power.
		Symphonia is the Orthodox relationship between the Church and the State, where the State protects the Church, and the Church protects the State from falling into sin and heresy.
		In 1916, after the Russian Civil War, known as the Time of Troubles, the Russians elected Michael Romanov, 16 years of age, as Tsar of Russia, and the Romanov family ruled from 1613 until 1917.
		During this period, Russia prospered.
		They became more focused on Christianity and promoted it worldwide through missionary work.
		While Christianity was the main religion, there were Jews, Muslims, and pagans who were free to practice their own religion.
		The only religion that was made illegal was the Talmudic worshipping Jews, because the Talmudic traditions were seen as anti-Christian and in complete opposition of their spiritual goals.
		These anti-Christian philosophies infiltrated the country when Freemasonry migrated to Russia in the mid-1700s.
		The Freemasons taught that the traditional Christian values upheld by the dynasty were outdated and were keeping Russia from competing with the West.
		Liberal ideas were introduced, such as misogyny, because women weren't allowed to be Freemasons, which became so popular that if you were a noble person, you had to be a Freemason.
		And Freemasonry taught that all religions can be one, and therefore, the Russian Orthodox Symphonia must be abolished.
		The Tsar stood strongly against this, and so the idea of revolution was introduced.
		During the industrialization of the 1800s, factories became home to Masonic revolutionary ideas.
		And in 1917, the revolution began, and the royal family was taken prisoner.
		The family was taken from their home to a stone house several miles away, on the highest point of the Ural Mountains, called Ascension Hill, and murdered.
		According to the official narrative, they were executed by a firing squad in the basement.
		But according to the evidence, they were murdered in a very dark, ritual manner.
		According to the investigation of the Orthodox Church, the murderers themselves, and the material evidence, this is what happened on the night of July 17th, 1918.
		The Stone House was known by the Bolsheviks to be a place where evil acts have taken place in the past.
		It was prepared ahead of time, and the murder involved 11 assassins and 11 victims.
		The czar, his wife, the four daughters, the son, and four servants.
		The number 11 is believed to be based on the 11 apostles who remained after Judas betrayed Christ.
		These 11 people were taken into the basement, they were shot in the knees, and they were stabbed with bayonets.
		And during all of this, their mouths were gagged to quiet their screams.
		In their memoirs, the murderers wrote it was so bad that they were vomiting.
		The bodies were then wrapped up in white linen, placed into the back of a truck, and kept alive as they were driven to a swampy area outside of the city.
		They were finally murdered by being hung upside down to drain their blood.
		They were beheaded, their teeth removed, and their bodies chopped into pieces.
		The body parts were partially dissolved in acid and then burned.
		Eggs were boiled, sprinkled with ash from the burnt linens which were soaked in royal blood, and consumed at the crime scene.
		The czar's head was placed into a jar, preserved in alcohol, and shipped to Moscow.
		In the 1920s, the Romanov family diaries were released by the Bolsheviks.
		They showed the Tsar to be an honorable man, highly intelligent involving political affairs, and a devout Christian.
		As if part of the ritual, this brought shame to the Russian people who were turned against the Tsar through Marxist propaganda.
		The Federal Reserve System, the Rothschilds, and the British Roundtable opposed the Tsar and the traditional Christian policies that stood in the way of their plans for world domination.
		And many Russians see the murder of Tsar Nicholas II as a necessary precursor to the New World Order, which began proliferating after his death.
		Tsar Nicholas II is now a saint in the Russian Orthodox Church, and millions of Russian Orthodox Christians believe they need to repent for allowing the dynasty to be destroyed.
		Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reis.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Absolute bombshell report from Greg Reis.
		The ritual regicide of the Romanov dynasty.
		Share it now at Bandod Video while you still can.
unidentified		Wednesday, June 5th in the year of our Lord 2024.
		And you're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
		Watch it live right now at band dot video.
		Morning, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the American Journal.
		I'm your host Harrison Smith.
		Very big show for you today.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		A lot of news from across the spectrum.
		Lots of stuff going on right now.
		We got Hunter Biden in court.
		I'll tell you a little bit about that.
		We got Biden deciding to pretend to do something about the border.
		And it's just a cacophony of lies.
		I mean, it really is bewildering.
		Dizzying, practically.
		We've also got Merrick Garland.
		Being questioned by Congress, Jack Massey making some very good points in opposition to Merrick Garland's attack dog, Jack Smith, and his legal authority to even exist.
		We, of course, have the Ukraine war expanding and accelerating and the Israel war entering uncharted territory, let's just say, as the whole of North Israel has burned And Hezbollah appears to be preparing for an invasion.
		So things are about to get interesting in that regard.
		Let's begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch.
unidentified		All right, here it is, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Your Daily Dispatch for Wednesday, the 5th of June, 2024.
		Giant venomous flying spiders with four-inch legs heading to New York area as they spread across the East Coast, experts say.
		Yeah, good morning.
		Yes, they will be receiving high-end apartment buildings at taxpayer expense.
		They will be supported fully.
		They're registering with the CBP app and coming through the ports of entry.
		We have to let them in.
		I mean, they're more American than we are, if we're being honest, the giant venomous flying spiders.
unidentified		What would we do without them?
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		I feel like this is a metaphor.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		You think so?
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		I feel like it.
		I just... I don't know.
		Something about it.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I don't know.
		They're not parasites, though.
		Maybe had a tick invasion.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		Oh, and these spiders aren't, they're not harmful to humans.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right, right.
		There is that too.
		No, let's be honest.
		They'll be doing a lot less damage than the humans coming across the border.
		First came the spotted lanternflies, then the cicadas, and now spiders?
		The Northeast U.S.
		is bracing for an invasion of giant venomous spiders with 4-inch long legs that can parachute through the air.
		Earlier this year, New Jersey Pest Control warned of the incoming spiders, saying Joro spiders can be hard to miss as females have a leg span of up to 4 inches and are known for their vibrant yellow and gray bodies.
		What sets them apart, however, is their ability to fly, a trait uncommon among spiders, the company said.
		While not accurate flight in the avian sense, giro spiders utilize a technique known as ballooning, where they release silk threads in the air, allowing them to be carried by the wind.
		Carried by the wind.
		So they won't be taking advantage of the International flights the Biden administration is offering.
		But once they're here, they will be registered, given a free phone and a place to stay at a five star hotel in New York City.
		Because.
		You know, we are a nation of giant venomous spiders.
		A nation of immigrants, a nation of giant... I mean, there's a plaque on the Statue of Liberty that says, bring us your tired, your poor, your giant, venomous spiders.
		And so we have to.
		We have to let them in.
		We have to give them a place in our elementary schools.
		Meanwhile, Ukraine strikes inside Russia with US-provided weapons.
		On Tuesday, a member of Ukraine's parliament told New York Times that Ukraine had launched strikes inside of Russian territory using US-provided HIMARS rocket system after President Biden lifted restrictions on Kiev's use of the weapons.
		We'll return back to you.
		Ukraine later in the show, but yes, this is World War three.
		Yes, they are playing with nuclear fire Yes, Putin has told us what the consequences of this action will be and yes It is the desired outcome of those in power in Europe as we drive headlong towards World War three since they're starting to lose grip and need another crisis a real big one this time to Bring Europeans back under control bring them to heal and
		If you will now, this is a bizarre set of headlines that I'm seeing this one from New York Post.
		But I actually I'd rather cover this one from the Wall Street Journal behind closed doors.
		Biden is showing signs of slipping.
		Which is really saying something because when he's in front of closed doors when he's out in public, the man is Mr. Magoo.
		The man makes Montgomery Burns look like an Olympic gymnast.
		If it's worse behind closed doors, we've really got something to worry about.
		I mean, this is really not good.
		Participants in meetings say the 81-year-old president performed poorly at times.
		The White House says Biden is sharp and his critics are playing partisan politics.
		Or they're just using their eyeballs.
		One of those.
		It's one of those two things.
		They are either accurately observing reality or it's partisan politics.
		It probably is one of those.
		Don't worry.
		The Easter Bunny is here to tell Joe Biden what to do and where to go.
		This video, I remind you, from two years ago.
		So, it's only gotten worse.
		So yes, folks, they say behind closed doors, Biden is slipping, while meanwhile, behind the podium, he is gibbering like an idiot.
		Meanwhile, what else we got?
		Poisonous spiders, missiles being launched into Russia courtesy of the United States, and a president who even his own administration is now admitting isn't all there mentally.
		But of course, We've known this for a while and it all is coming out in the Hunter Biden trial.
		Hunter Biden trial puts America and this is I just I chose this headline in particular because it highlights one of the leftist liberal psychopath New World Order powers that be one of their favorite tactics in covering up their own crimes.
		They'll cover up crimes, they'll deny crimes, they'll call you crazy for talking about their crimes up until it becomes impossible to ignore, and then they'll say the crime is your fault.
		Actually, it's all of us who do this.
		CNN writes, Hunter Biden trial puts America's addiction crisis back into focus.
		Oh, is that what this is about?
		This is about America's addiction?
		It's all of us.
		It's America's addiction crisis.
		It's not Hunter Biden being a crack-addled, whoremongering idiot.
		It's America's crisis.
		This is all of our fault, really.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		We are Hunter Biden.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		We're all Hunter Biden.
		I mean, who hasn't?
		Smoked two grams of crack with a Russian victim of human trafficking.
		I mean, I think this is really, it's all of us.
		We are all Hunter Biden.
		We are all horror-mongering pornographers.
		We've all sold America out to China for millions of dollars.
		We all have highly appointed positions in Ukraine government.
		Uh, oil companies.
		I mean, this is all of us, I think.
		We all really need to look at ourselves when we see Hunter Biden and recognize that this isn't the fault of one man and his family and generation upon generation of trauma and corruption.
		No, this is America's addiction.
		Okay?
		So look at yourself if you want to judge Hunter Biden.
		It's the same thing they did with the Me Too movement.
		Remember the Me Too movement?
		Do you remember that?
		Remember when that happened?
		It's sort of gone away now because it stopped being politically useful.
		But for a while there, people were having their lives destroyed, entire industries were upended.
		It was just a constant stream of accusations.
		Why?
		To cover up for the fact that producers in Hollywood were raping actresses at an industrial scale.
		That's what was actually happening.
		And so time and time again, Hunter Biden or with Harvey Weinstein or Jeffrey Epstein or anybody else, they get caught and then they turn around and go, wow, we all really need to think about this.
		We all really need to think about this culture that we have.
		It's like, well, you're the rapist.
		Okay.
		We're the ones stopping you.
		So what is this we thing you keep talking about?
		Literally, they get caught with their hand in the cookie jar and you go, Hey, what the hell are you doing?
		You're stealing cookies.
		And they go, you know, This whole country has a problem with cookie stealing.
		I mean, it's like you can't turn your back and somebody's got their hand, they're just covered in cookie crumbs.
		It's you.
		You're the ones doing this.
		You are the criminals.
		You are the rapists.
		You are the drug addicts.
		It's you.
		It's not us.
		It's not all of us.
		They get caught systematically.
		Raping actresses and covering it up, using ex-Mossad agents to blackmail people that were coming forward.
		They do that and then they turn around and go, America is a rape culture.
		And then they actually virtue signal and actually act like they're the superior ones.
		They're the ones confronting this and facing this and bringing this forward.
		They stand up on the stage of the Oscars and say, we are all healing and we are on the forefront of this.
		I mean, it's so Ridiculous.
		But this is what they do.
		So they're going to try to disguise Hunter Biden's just egregious and abominable behavior by putting it all on us.
		It's America's addiction crisis.
		Of course, you can also ignore the fact that the addiction crisis has been fueled primarily by Democrat policies and the people desperately trying to stop the inflow of things like fentanyl, stop the proliferation of crack on the streets.
		Yeah, that's the conservatives.
		The Democrats are the ones creating open air drug markets in places like Portland because they think that if the problem is drugs, the solution is more drugs.
		These people are dumb and bad at everything.
		So let's just Lay that out for everyone.
		So that's it, that's your Daily Dispatch.
		I guess we also have this, I'm not sure if this was in the Daily Dispatch or not, but it's an interesting topic, certainly.
		Mulberry St.
		George City Successions Foster Modern Day Segregation.
		This is a story from Bloomberg about new white fortress cities in the American South.
		Basically, neighborhoods in cities that are nice and well taken care of and full of wealthy, prosperous, hardworking people are sick of all of their money being taken and given to big city programs that perpetuate a cycle of poverty and drug addiction and dependency.
		So they're separating.
	They're saying, you don't get our tax money anymore.
	It's going to go to us from now on.
	Our hard work, our money, our income is not going to be garnished by half to pay for inner city welfare programs.
	Why should it?
	It doesn't benefit them.
	It doesn't help them.
	It doesn't benefit the people it even is supposed to benefit.
	So they're saying no from now on.
	They're saying you don't get to have a say over our neighborhood and you don't get a slice of our money to go towards your Self-perpetuating programs and they're very mad about this because the people doing this are largely white while people in the dependency Section of this equation are largely african-american white fortressing.
	I think it sounds super cool.
	The problem is That that's the last step There's nowhere to go from there the last century of American history can basically be told in white people trying to get away from disastrous democratic policies that rob them to destroy minority populations.
	But they've gone as far as they can go.
	So the it's been that white people used to live in cities.
	And then they all moved out to the suburbs, called that white flight.
	Now, some are moving back to the cities.
	They call that gentrification because, remember, when white people do anything, it's bad.
	Leave cities, that's white flight.
	That's bad.
	Move to cities, that's gentrification.
	That's bad.
	Separate from the cities, that's building white fortresses.
	That's the worst.
	But it's also the final step.
	Where do you go from there?
	So even after white flight to the suburbs, there's been another movement where now everybody's moving out to the country, Everybody's moving out to small towns by just getting away from the city completely beyond the suburb level.
	And now they're like building fortresses.
	So where do you go from there?
	That's it.
	That's the end.
	And the reason you build fortresses is because white people can't be left alone.
	You can't just go and create your own.
	Society or civilization or town Because that apparently is bad.
	That's selfish of you to be successful and prosperous and safe and clean and pleasant That's very selfish of you to keep that for yourself So it has to be dismantled and parceled out to people that didn't build it and didn't contribute.
	So Once you've built your fortress once you've built the wall around you They're gonna come anyway They're going to make you tear it down or they're going to tear it down for you.
	And then then what's next?
	What's there?
	There's nowhere to go.
	There's nowhere to go.
	You've already fled to the country.
	That's not enough.
	It's like that clip.
	There's a clip from some podcast that's gone viral where it's the it's an Asian guy being like, we should just round up all the white people and put them on an island somewhere.
	And the white guy's like, yeah, that's fine.
	But then the island would be the best place to live and everybody would try to get there.
	They don't hate white people, they want white people's stuff.
	That's the message I'm getting from this.
	How dare you try to separate from our terrible policies and our endless drain on resources to fund and facilitate a criminal populace.
	I'm not saying minorities are criminal populace, I'm saying that's what cities do with their money, so why should you give it to them?
	This is nonsense.
	I think it's a great method and it's not even, I mean, it's a form of secession, which is what we've talked about ever since we talked about secession, not existing only in a state level, you know, a state leaves the union, but you can, your neighborhood can secede from your city, your county can secede from your state, your state can secede from your country, you can secede from your city.
	And all of these things, in my opinion, are positive.
	Houston is like a city of cities.
	And they have a good method, like where I grew up, West University, it's a city.
	It has a city council, it has a mayor.
	We decide on our own, like what we do with our money, what the roads are paved with, what the sewer system, when the sewer system gets an upgrade, it's like a small town within the larger city.
	I think that's a great way of organizing.
	I think it works very well.
	I think you get to decide, you know, like Houston has no zoning.
	In the city, so you can have like an industrial park next to a neighborhood.
	It's actually awesome.
	It actually works really well.
	But in a place like Westview, that neighborhood can say, we do want zoning.
	Actually, we don't want high rise buildings here because we want to keep the traffic low.
	We don't want industrial parks because we want normal parks.
	And you can just do that.
	So the smaller the Civil organization, the better it serves the people there.
	So I think this is good, and I don't think there's any reason why some neighborhood 30 minutes outside of Baton Rouge should be responsible for paying a huge portion of their income for the poverty programs in Baton Rouge that have never been successful, have never provided a positive path forward for the neighborhoods and populations they're supposed to serve.
	And are a massive drain on resources of the people that actually earn the money.
	So, good for them.
	They should be seceding.
	And if they want to demonize this by calling it white fortressing, that's just because they don't like it.
	It's not that it's bad.
	It's not that it's a bad thing morally.
	It's just you're taking their money.
	Well, you're keeping your money, which they wanted to take.
	And so they're mad at you.
	It's really as simple as that.
	It really is.
	The Louisiana Supreme Court last month cleared a path for the creation of a new city, St.
	George, after a prolonged legal battle over the feasibility of the city and the implications for tax revenue.
	The implications for tax revenue.
	their money.
unidentified		St.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Other people want to take their money.
		And this article is trying to convince you that the moral position is to be on the side of the people trying to take the money they didn't earn and that it's immoral for the people who earn the money to not want to have it taken from them.
		That's how this breaks down.
		St. George would take almost 100,000 residents away from East Baton Rouge Parish and critics say it would deplete the parish of resources from this wealthier, whiter community.
		Now, again, the neighborhood didn't make this about race.
unidentified		Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		These people made it about race.
		There's nothing in the city charter of St.
		George that says this is a white-only city.
		That's not the case.
		What this may represent, what is an aspect of this, is that people, when given the choice, choose to live around people that are like themselves, culturally, racially, Religiously, politically, that's what humans do.
		And that's inconvenient for people that would rather keep a whole bunch of disparate and contentious populations jammed in together to create strife.
		St.
		George would take almost 100,000 residents away.
		As researchers on racial equity, we have been studying moves like this to create a new city.
		What we found is that these secessions perpetuate modern-day segregation and limit opportunity for left-behind communities, a form of opportunity hoarding that we call white fortressing.
		I'm here to tell you folks, white fortressing is good and cool.
		And thank you for this awesome label of a positive development.
		Because again, it's not actually white forging.
		That's a lie.
		That's a racial smear, basically.
		It's like a blood libel.
		against white people?
		I guarantee you there are people of all race, colors, and creeds in this neighborhood in Baton Rouge.
		I guarantee you the black people that live there probably also want this.
		Why wouldn't they?
		Why wouldn't a prosperous, successful, wealthy black person who's worked hard and bought a nice house in a nice neighborhood, why would he not want to have sovereignty over how his tax dollars are spent?
		Why would he want his money being stolen by scumbags in Baton Rouge to pay for votes?
		I mean, this is stupid, right?
		It actually doesn't have much to do with race at all until they make it about race because they want to paint it as evil, whitey stealing from black people when in reality it's normal people not wanting their tax dollars going towards broken systems that perpetuate systemic and intergenerational failure.
		Failure.
		We've been studying moves like this as researchers of racial equity.
		Modern day segregation.
		See the problem with all of this is that segregation in the traditional sense under Jim Crow and in the Post-war South was a government restriction.
		There were actual laws on the books that dictated whether you could or couldn't do certain things or go certain places because of your race.
		Which, I would say, violates the intention of the American system.
		And you should not have the government forcing segregation.
		That being said, there is absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with voluntary segregation.
		It is so natural, we don't even notice it most of the time.
		Just look at Thomas Sowell, he's done tons of research on this.
		Why are 99% of church congregations in America almost exclusively one race or another?
		White people go to white churches.
		Black people go to black churches.
		No one had to force that and nobody's saying that's a bad thing.
		People tend to choose to be around people that are like them.
		That's normal.
		What's wrong with that?
		What's not normal is when you've got a power structure that's forcing people to be separate when they would otherwise want to interact or intermingle.
		Or a government structure like we have now that forces people to intermingle and interact when they wouldn't do so naturally or normally or in the normal course of things.
		So there's nothing wrong or racist or anything about a neighborhood wanting to leave a city.
		The issue is that the entire philosophy and ideology and political framework of globalism and equity and all this stuff relies on centralization under massive centralized governments, whether that's in a city or in a national federal capital.
		And they don't want people keeping their own money.
		They don't want... I mean, they have programs.
		They have endless programs for all sorts of welfare and, you know, monetary support for populations that don't earn anything that require stealing that money from people that do earn it.
		That is a failing, broken system.
		And if these people don't want their money going towards that, they have every right to vote to be separate.
		That's what they did.
		Back, folks.
		Got a lot of news to get into today from Hunter Biden, from Warren Ukraine, so much more.
		I was going to move away from this white fortressing thing, but this article really sort of proves exactly what I'm saying with this paragraph.
		When white communities fortress themselves, they siphon away resources.
		Now, this isn't a white community, by the way.
		It's at least 12% African-American, but that's fine.
		They want to.
		I mean, they hate white people.
		They've got white people to hate themselves.
		They're pretty open about their dismissal of concerns of white Americans.
		So when white communities fortress themselves, they siphon away resources from the larger region, including communities of color.
		Siphon away resources.
		In Louisiana, it's estimated that St.
	George's secession could take $48.3 million in annual tax revenue from East Baton Rouge, Paris, nearly 8% of the parish's total revenue.
	So they characterize that as siphoning away resources.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		You try to siphon me, I'll siphon you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		The siphoning going on is from St.
		George to Baton Rouge and they want to cut that off.
		These people have a literally inverted view of the world.
		Where if they're not allowed to take something from you, in their mind, that's you stealing.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		But if you call it reparations, you're going to jail.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And I mean, they go to the strangest lengths to try to make an argument about this.
		Having more governments in a geographical area, for example, municipalities or school districts, has been shown to negatively affect health outcomes for black Americans, but not white.
		What the hell are they talking about?
		Our city used to have one school district, but now we have two.
		The black guy's like, My health!
unidentified		My heart!
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Two school districts!
		There was only one before!
		What are they talking about?
		What the hell are they talking about?
		Multiple school districts, multiple municipalities in a geographical area destroys the health of black people?
		Okay.
		Wow, very compelling.
		No, I'm shocked.
		I'm trusting the science.
		It's ridiculous.
		Proponents of the new city in Louisiana argue this is a move towards fairness rather than isolation.
		On their website they state, St.
		George's taxpayers provide two-thirds of the revenue to East Baton Rouge Paris government and only one-third of that government's expense in return.
		Yeah.
		Incorporating a city would reverse the unjust circumstances to an extent.
		So again, this is... That's obvious, right?
		This is just the way things work.
		Hey, we're paying for most of it and we don't get anything in return.
		That's not fair.
		No, it's not fair.
		To these people, that is fair.
		What's not fair is you getting to keep your own money.
		That's not fair to them.
		You get this?
		You know what I'm saying here?
		Rune residents of the Buckhead neighborhood in Atlanta were advocating for secession in 2022.
		They also argued that they were, quote, not getting back services what they were paying in city taxes.
		Well, why should they?
		Why should they?
		So, I mean, this whole thing is just whining.
		It's all, this is just one big article whining that people are keeping their own money.
		It's not that big of a deal.
		Georgia has added 11 new cities around metro Atlanta since 2005, most of which are affluent white communities that broke away from the majority black slash non-white counties.
		Last month, residents of a wealthy majority white neighborhood in Gwinnett County, the northern suburbs just above Atlanta, voted to approve the forming of a new city of Mulberry, just as the city has become majority black.
		Now, of course, there's also black communities that are creating their own cities and municipalities and separating from the established structure.
		But that's good and fine and beautiful and must happen.
		But only if it's paid for with money that white people earned.
		I'm sure you can prove that not stealing money from somebody will disadvantage you.
		city's formation will reduce East Baton Rouge's parish's revenue.
		I guess.
		They claim the parish will not be adversely impacted.
		There's no way to know for sure because there hasn't been a true comprehensive analysis of the economic, health, and educational impacts.
		I'm sure you can prove that not stealing money from somebody will disadvantage you, I guess.
		But that's only because that's the first level of impact.
		The second level of impact might be that the people in East Baton Rouge's parish will no longer have the wealth of others to rely on and will have to actually earn it themselves And maybe East Baton Rouge, Paris might actually stop being a drain on its neighbors.
		Maybe they'll actually start earning their own money and not have to rely on money stolen from other people.
		Would that be a positive development?
		I think so.
		I think it'd be nice if we didn't have entire cities in this country full of people that don't contribute for their entire lives.
		I think that's a bad situation that we're in and that we should work on Americans of every race, color, and creed creating things and being prosperous and actually Can I wargame this with you?
		What's up?
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		Can I wargame this with you?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		I feel like the effect of this may actually be a little bit of like that unintended consequences we get when we prohibit substances.
		You create a black market, right?
		I think what would happen, right, would be Crime would tick up in areas that are extremely impoverished because it's not like people train themselves with skills overnight, right?
		So there would be a catch-up game that would need to be played there.
		But I think as a stopgap, right, because people are living under the poverty level, I would assume, in Baton Rouge.
		I've been to the area to do community service and things like that.
		And I understand, like, even north of that, like in Mississippi, like the Delta, there are extremely impoverished places in the United States.
		And, you know, I would think that federal assistance in terms of food stamps and things like that would, Welfare will actually have to be provided right as a stopgap measure in the interim, right?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, probably.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		They do have all these programs if you're relying on, but then again, I mean, I bet you we could take a look at the Baton Rouge City budget.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		Oh, there's probably tons of waste, fraud, and abuse, right?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, they talk about $48 million.
		I bet I could cut $48 million from the Baton Rouge city budget and have a positive impact on the city.
		I mean, yeah, I've been to Baton Rouge, too.
		It's not a nice place.
		It's not exactly, you know, postcard.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		There are pockets that are nice, right?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Sure.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		Obviously.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, like St.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		George.
unidentified		Right.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		That don't want to become trash like the rest of the city.
unidentified		Yeah.
unidentified		Yeah.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I mean, I guess this is the issue with being dependent, is that you have to keep being dependent, and that if the people want to stop providing you money, it's like an attack on you.
		It's like, well, this never should have been the situation in the first place.
		You never should have been reliant on these people in the first place.
		So, that was your mistake.
		It might be a rough transition zone for a few moments, but at the end of the day, I imagine The money that's being taken from these people, I mean, it's, we just know, like, we know it's not going towards the building up of the community.
		It's just not.
		Because that's not what government projects do.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		I think another thing that is kind of interesting is that proponents for, you know, people say, oh yeah, you know, it's our strength that our election systems are decentralized, right?
		Well, why isn't that also the case with, you know, municipalities, right?
		Break everything up, right?
		You have smaller bureaucracies in these smaller townships, right?
		Meaning I would think that typically things would get done easier with smaller bureaucracies.
		And then beyond that, um, uh, you know, it makes things more competitive between townships.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
unidentified		Right.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It would.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		And it would, it may create more opportunities for businesses.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I think it would do that as well.
		And look, you know, what do the people of East Baton Rouge want?
		Do they want to just, you know, steal all of their wealthy neighbors?
		Welcome back, folks.
		to fund themselves or do they want to be self-sufficient and build themselves up?
		At the end of the day, it's not about money.
		It's not really about money.
		You can have a poor, a dirt poor community that's happy and healthy and safe.
		It's not about money.
		It's not about money.
		It's about the quality of the people.
unidentified		Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		This is the American Journal.
		We're going to go through some political news here.
		I guess I'm always, I'm always sort of torn between wanting to not play into the left-right paradigm.
		That's obviously a, you know, divide and conquer tactic.
		I mean, it's, you know, you play one side off the other.
		I mean, this stuff's been going on since Justinian.
		The greens and blues.
		So I don't, I, you know, I know that most of the Republicans in office are totally co-opted, totally worthless.
		Well, less than worthless.
		I mean, worthless would be better than what we have most of the time.
		Legitimately better to have a cardboard cutout who just flopped around than to have some of these people representing us.
		Considering the fact that they do nothing positive for us and occasionally will surrender to the Democrats without getting anything in return.
		Or they'll go to bat and start passing laws on the behalf of Israel.
		Like it's going out of style.
		Like they can't do it fast enough.
		Which is annoying.
		I'd rather them just not do anything than only do something for our foreign country.
		It'd be better if they just were completely lifeless.
		But regardless, the reason I struggle is because while Republicans are frustrating and embarrassing and stupid and traitorous and weak and petulant and corrupt, just like the Democrats, There's something unique about the Democrats.
		There's a unique level of evil that exudes from them.
		And it's hard to put into words how arrogantly hypocritical they are.
		I've said a million times before, it's beyond hypocrisy.
		Because there's such thing as like positive hypocrisy.
		I'm a smoker, but I tell you not to smoke.
		That's hypocritical, but it's correct.
		It's right.
		It's good.
		And what I'm telling you is correct.
		But these people.
		Is so.
		I mean, they're just.
		How do I say this?
		It's everything that they do constantly all the time, right?
		Because their beliefs, like the central core of their beliefs is rotten and fetid and cancerous.
		So it's like they can't talk about neighborhoods leaving cities without the whole article just being saturated in, first of all, racial hate against white people.
		But also just inverting everything where them stealing from you, if you stop that, you're the one being greedy.
		It's like, it just, when you talk about the border, when you talk about just everything, it's just, they are agents of chaos, agents of terror and destruction on every level.
		And Republicans aren't like that.
		Again, Republicans are stupid and bad at what they do, and they fail to get anything for the American people.
		That's not good.
		But they're not actively engaged, generally, with the open subversion of everything good.
		But that's what the Democrats are.
		And it's like, it's overwhelming.
		As you listen to them talk.
		Because not only are they so tyrannical and abusive and despotic, But they're like arrogant in the smirk as they, you know, step on your windpipe.
		It does something to my brain.
		I see red.
		So let's go through some political headlines and we'll see if we can't draw some conclusions from this stuff.
		This one, first of all, is Crazy this even has to be said.
		Trump asks a judge to lift New York gag order following conviction.
		Why is there a gag order after the conviction?
		The reason for the gag order, supposedly, was because they kept saying that Trump was trying to intimidate the jury.
		He was trying to sway the outcome of the process by speaking out against what was going on to him.
		So the reason they justified a gag order So that it wouldn't affect the outcome of the trial.
		The trial's over.
		The gag order shouldn't be there anymore.
		The reason for the gag order doesn't exist.
		So why is it still there?
		It's still there for the same reason the trial was held in the first place.
		To stop Trump campaigning.
		To silence him.
		Limit him.
		To shackle him on the campaign trail.
		Donald Trump's lawyers on Tuesday asked the judge who oversaw the former president's criminal trial to lift a gag order on their client as the presidential campaign intensifies.
	The lawyer said in a letter to the judge, Wanan Mirchan, that the end of the trial on Thursday nullified the need for the gag order, which bars the former president from attacking witnesses, the jury and others involved in the case.
	So he was already convicted.
	The trial is concluded.
	They say the concerns articulated by the government in the court to do not justify continued restrictions on the First Amendment rights of President Trump, the lawyers wrote in the letter.
	So at this point, as we speak right now, the number one opponent to the current ruling regime, the number one political challenger to the Democrats, in the middle of a campaign, at the height of campaign season, has a gag order on him for a trial that's already concluded.
	Which means he just has a gag order on him arbitrarily.
	There's a legal order stopping him from talking about certain things, With no justification.
	What?
	How?
	Why?
	Why though?
	But why though?
	This is a clear violation.
	It's got to be a violation of his rights to campaign.
	It's a violation of our rights as American voters to be able to best choose our candidate.
	We are being restricted from hearing from our candidate because of a Gag order for a case that's already over.
	I mean, this is... So this is the thing.
	It's like... They don't care.
	They're keeping the gag order on.
	They still have Donald Trump under a gag order.
	Why?
	Because they can't.
	Because... Political will.
	Because they want to.
	And so they do.
	That's... That's how these people operate.
	It's not about what's right or wrong.
	It's not about...
	Democracy or morals or principles.
	It's about power.
	It's about convenience.
	It's about efficacy.
	What is best for their political outcome?
	To silence their opponents.
	So that's what they do.
	And that's their only consideration.
	That's it.
	That's all.
	So that's what they're doing.
	Meanwhile, Arizona GOP files bombshell lawsuit against corrupt Secretary of State after discovering from 500,000 to 1.3 million illegal voters on state's voter roll.
	Thank you, America.
	Thank you, Arizona Republican Party, for showing the rest of America what must be done to bring back election integrity in America today.
	The Arizona Republican Party filed a lawsuit against the corrupt Secretary of State Adrian Fontes after discovering from half a million to 1.3 million illegal voters on the state's voter rolls.
	And this is, you know, why would you, you know, the fact that this has to be filed, the fact they have to ask To have this happen.
	The fact that the Democrats aren't doing it.
	It's like, would you even play Monopoly with these people?
	Would you play Mario Party with cheaters of this level?
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		Well, yeah, because it's more difficult to cheat at Mario Party.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, maybe that's true.
		Yeah, maybe that's true.
		But it's just, I mean, it's ubiquitous.
		It's in everything.
		Lawsuits, they'll cheat.
		They'll rig it.
		Voter rolls, they'll fill them up with illegals.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		I think we should stop giving them the benefit of the doubt.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		We're gonna stop giving the Democrats the benefit of the doubt on this show.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I agree.
		If by benefit of the doubt you mean the right to vote, I think we should take the right to vote away from them.
		I think we should disenfranchise them.
		Completely.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		What if there were like negative Half a million to 1.3 million Democrats that got kicked off the voter rolls.
		Boom.
		How would they feel?
		How would they feel, right?
		Their votes, their votes were diluted by half a million to a million.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		But you put the shoe on the other foot.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Because that's the thing.
		If you're playing Monopoly with these people, guess what?
		You gotta cheat too or you're gonna lose.
		Now, Monopoly doesn't matter that much.
		This, this is the future of our nation.
		So, they're putting America in a position where either it's just gonna be a competition to who can cheat the most and whoever cheats the most wins, or we stop these people from cheating through extreme measures.
		Massive suspicion all the time, because we know what they're like, we know what they do.
		We gotta stop them, or just democracy goes away.
unidentified		Alright, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Continuing here, going through our political stack.
		No guests today, so we'll open up the phone lines in the third hour.
		But this story sort of, again, is symbolic, is just simply representative of a wider trend that we see.
		From nationalreview.com by Andrew McCarthy.
		Court confirms Weiss's special counsel appointment is a sham.
		The Biden Justice Department AG Merrick Garland's special counsel appointment of Biden Justice Department Delaware U.S.
		Attorney David Weiss in the Hunter Biden case is a fraud on the public.
		In a pretrial ruling denying the Younger Biden's motion to dismiss the case, Judge Mary Ellen Noriega has confirmed that Garland's appointment of Weiss did not comply with federal regulations for appointing special counsels.
		That, however, was not a basis to dismiss the case, particularly with Garland and Weiss quietly citing the last special counsel regulation, 600.10 of Title 28 Code of Federal Regulations, which provides that no one may hold the Justice Department accountable for flouting its own regulations.
		McCarthy says, to be clear, I have never contended that Garland lacked the authority to assign Weiss or whoever he wanted to assign to investigate the Biden case.
		As Judge Noriega explained, the federal statutory law, in particular 509, 510, 515 and 533, Vest attorney generals with sweeping powers to run the Justice Department as they see fit, including power to designate any DOJ lawyer they choose to run investigations anywhere in the country.
		Weiss, for example, is now prosecuting Hunter Biden in Los Angeles on the tax case scheduled to begin on trial in September.
		In addition to the gun case in Weiss' own Delaware district, that's because Garland doubled down in assigning the investigation of the president's son to the same prosecutor, Weiss, who had just schemed with defense lawyers on a failed sweetheart plea deal.
		That was designed to make all conceivable cases against said son disappear.
		And only after Weiss had consciously dithered as to the statute of limitations already eviscerated serial criminal offenses, steadily eviscerated serial criminal offenses.
		So this is the way Merrick Garland is operating these days.
		Whether it's Weiss or Jack Smith, he appoints one person to cover and charge and be a part of all the proceedings with an individual.
		So you put a lenient Democrat operative in charge of the Hunter Biden.
		Scandals, the various ones.
		And what comes out is like a sweetheart plea deal and the felonies are getting turned into misdemeanors and couched under other things.
		And it's all just going to go away until the Republicans step in and force his hand and force him to actually put Hunter Biden on trial and separate the felony from the other things that he was allowing him a plea deal with.
		And you put Jack Smith in charge of Trump and you say, go after him, get get him on whatever, whatever you can get him on, do it.
		Election meddling, phone call Georgia, January 6th, whatever.
		He's yours.
		Go after him.
		You're the attack dog.
		Sick him.
		Thomas Massey had some words about this.
		Telling Merrick Garland, you've created an office in the US government that doesn't exist without the authorization from Congress.
		Let's go down to clip number five.
unidentified		The gentleman from Kentucky is recognized for five minutes.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		Was Jack Smith nominated by President Biden or confirmed by the U.S.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		Senate?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		You're asking me about a case again?
unidentified		Motions filed... This is a simple question.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		Was Jack Smith nominated by President Biden?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		No, he was not.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		Was he confirmed by the Senate?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		No, he was not.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		When was his special counsel statute passed?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		There is no special counsel statute.
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		There was an independent counsel statute that was expired.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		So it expired.
		So what gives you the authority to appoint a special counsel?
		You've created an office in the U.S.
		government that does not exist without authorization from Congress.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		This is, again, another example of this ultimate conflict taking place right now that most people seem to not even notice.
		And that is that The Democrats are actively reorganizing our entire government system into a single-branch, one-party operation.
		This is called usurping the power of Congress.
		This is called cutting the strings that allow Congress to actually have control over the American government, meaning our representatives having control over the American government, meaning that the Democrats are actively, as we speak, consolidating the three branches into one Using that power to make sure they stay in office forever.
		It's a coup.
		It's the actual destruction of this country.
		It's so inverted how the Democrats are.
		It's like...
		I think you get it.
		I think you get it.
		That they're actively destroying democracy while saying they're saving democracy, right?
		They call something border protection, whose entire purpose and function is opening the border.
		They say nobody's above the law.
		And then in the next sentence say, Joe Biden's guilty, but we're not going to charge him.
		And there's just no, there's no irony apparent.
		There's no awareness that what they're doing is utterly insane.
		Because they know what they're doing.
		Because they're not confused about what's going on here.
		They get it.
		They're usurping the power of Congress.
		They're asserting The executive branch's supremacy over the other branches of government, because the executive branch is not only the least accountable, it's got all the intelligence agencies, it's got the State Department, it's got all these other things that are in it.
		They're consolidating everything into the executive.
		They're rigging the executive.
		They're making it obvious that the person who sits in the Oval Office isn't the one in charge, because if he was, You know, Biden wouldn't be able to be him, right?
		Biden's not taking care of anything.
		Biden's not in charge of anything.
		So they're both crushing the power of Congress to have any say over what the government does.
		Again, blatantly, openly, like in their face, they're doing it.
		Merrick Garland was sent contempt of Congress charges, and he just ignored them.
		He should be arrested.
		When he shows up for the hearing and is in the halls of Congress, the Sergeant-at-Arms should put him in handcuffs to assert authority over him.
		To say, you don't get to decide what of our orders you obey.
		That's not how this works.
		We are in charge.
		We represent the American people.
		The American people are in charge.
		And as their representative, we are holding you to account.
		So what happens when Congress issues a contempt of Congress, issues a demand, a subpoena of some sort, and it's ignored by the other branch of government and nothing happens?
		That precedent is set.
		That power has been stripped from Congress and invested in the Department of Justice.
		And if Congress isn't willing to act on the mechanisms of control that they have over the functioning of the federal government, Then we, the American people, don't have a say in our government anymore.
		accepts as tangentially as possible.
		And so what they're doing with the appointment of these special counsels is not constitutional.
		No?
		It's not within the correct operation of the law.
		They're just doing it.
		And if Congress doesn't stop them from doing it, Then that's the way the government works from now on.
		So whether it's Weiss looking into Hunter Biden or Jack Smith looking into Donald Trump, neither of these positions are official.
		They're not accounted for in the constitution of the United States.
		So personally, if I was Donald Trump, anything I got from Jack Smith, any Subpoenas or requests for information or court dates.
		I would just say you have no authority until you can show me the constitutional provision that says I have to listen to you.
		You're just some dude.
		You're just some guy.
		This is how authority operates.
		This is how.
		When Kanye says slavery is a choice, it's like.
		You have to choose whether or not to give these people authority.
		Most of what the Democrats do is like a bluff.
		And nobody ever calls them on their bluff.
		Thomas Massie just did to some degree.
		But I'd almost say, I mean, I don't know what mechanisms there are that can be employed.
		But if you've got some guy, Jack Smith, who's acting as if and Telling people that he has authority as the U.S.
		government to do certain things.
		You charge him with impersonating a federal officer?
	I mean, if he's not actually gone through the appropriate procedure to be certified, but he's telling people that he has, is that not a crime of some sort?
	There are actual technical ways to undo all of this stuff within the bounds of the legal operating function of the law.
	The Democrats just do it.
	They just go, we've appointed Jack Smith as special counsel.
	He's going after Donald Trump now.
	He's going to send Trump to jail.
	And if you don't stop them, then they're going to get away with it and they're going to do it again.
	And that's just the way it works now.
	From now on, whenever they want, they can just appoint some federal investigator and just go, okay, this guy now has access to all this person's information.
	They can investigate every second of their lives.
	And you know, the other dangerous aspect of this is that when it's done correctly, when it's done through the proper process, there are restrictions and limitations and controls that they have to adhere to.
	Why would they have to adhere to those if their whole position isn't even valid in the first place?
	Why wouldn't they be able to circumvent Pfizer requirements or FOIA requests?
	Those things are all predicated on accessing the typical and lawful structure of government.
	If this is outside of that structure, you don't have the normal mechanisms and limitations that you should.
	So they're just, they're just doing this.
	And at the end of the day, what it represents is the overt, open usurpation of Congress's power into the hands of the executive branch.
	And they're doing the same thing with the Supreme Court, in case you haven't noticed.
	They're launching all sorts of fake, totally fabricated scandals as an excuse to try to get Alito and Clarence Thomas to recuse themselves on important decisions.
	They talk about packing the court.
	They talk about impeaching the Supreme Court justices.
	Over what?
	Well, I think so far they have Alito flew a historical American flag.
	And Clarence Thomas went on vacation.
	So that's their high crimes and misdemeanors that they are freaking out about.
	But look at what they do and not what they say.
	Just look at what they're doing, what they're actively trying to do.
	And it's obvious.
	They're undermining and or packing the Supreme Court, functionally the same.
	They are usurping the power of Congress.
	They are openly defying orders and subpoenas and contempt of Congress charges that come out of the House of Representatives and the Senate.
	They are asserting supremacy from one branch over the other two.
	Joe Biden said in a speech last week, the Supreme Court ruled against me, but they didn't stop me.
	They are asserting the supremacy of the executive branch over the other two branches of government, meaning this is the destruction of our democracy.
	This is the actual dismantling, reconfiguration of our entire governmental systems to do away with checks and balances.
	So that one branch, the executive branch, can operate completely without check, without balance, without limitation, without the ability of the American people to express their dissatisfaction, get those people out and replace them with somebody else.
	Except for the president, which is the easiest election to rig out of all of them.
	The easiest position to fill with a puppet.
	Andrew McCarthy notes, Garland is the attorney general, and he has that power.
	It is power he wields with no fear that Congress will slash the DOJ's budget, censure him, impeach him, or do anything else but caterwaul over how he abuses it.
	My point is that Garland has been engaged in a nearly four-year fraud, trying to con the country into believing the Justice Department is neither protecting its boss nor trying, to the extent politically feasible, to protect the President's son.
	The AG refused to appoint a special counsel for the Biden investigation despite the President and other Biden family members being implicated in Hunter's malfeasance, particularly crimes arising out of his peddling of his father's political influence for huge paydays from agents of corrupt and anti-American regimes.
	Garland rationalizes his defiance of regulations calling for special counsel appointment by insisting that Weiss was a Trump-appointed U.S.
	attorney who would be given unchecked discretion to follow the evidence wherever it led to it, to bring whatever charges were appropriate in whichever district the venue lay.
	In reality, Weiss had no connection of significance to Trump.
	He was appointed because he had the support of Delaware's two Biden allied Democratic senators.
	He was the sole Trump appointed prosecutor retained when President Biden took power because he proved useful.
	So you just put somebody useful in charge of the investigation, even though he has no legal authority to do so.
	And that is just emblematic of the overall ignorance to and dismissal of the rules and law and all these things they claim to base their whole system of belief on.
	It's all utter lies.
	This from Zeke Arkham.
	So Justices Alito and Thomas haven't done a thing which merits any sort of unjust bias or favoritism.
	Everything they've done has been decently within the standards of their office.
	Yet leftists screech every day for their removal, especially Thomas for some reason.
	But you had a biased district attorney who warped the definition of a crime, directly changed the statute of limitations in order to enforce that crime, unfairly targeted a former president, went on trial with a judge who was heavily biased against the defendant, was openly hostile towards the defendant, instructed the jury in a way which was detrimental to the defendant, and the defendant was found instructed the jury in a way which was detrimental to the But according to leftists, that trial was completely fair.
	Hypocrisy is real.
	No, it's not hypocrisy.
	It's not hypocrisy.
	It's not.
	It's really not.
	It's just lying.
	It's just power.
	It's just deception.
	It's not hypocrisy.
	They know.
	They're not being hypocrites.
	They're being authoritarians.
	They're being tyrants.
	They're being despots.
	There's nothing hypocritical about it.
	They're telling you what they're doing, and then they're doing it.
	Letitia James says, vote for me, and I'll go after Donald Trump every single day.
	That's all I'll do.
	She gets elected.
	That's what she does.
	Where's the hypocrisy?
	There's no hypocrisy there.
	They're just doing it.
	They just don't like when it's done to them.
	That's not hypocritical.
	It would be hypocritical.
	I mean, I don't know.
	I mean, it's hypocritical in the sense that they are constantly pining on and on about the rule of law.
	But again, that's just because they're liars.
	They don't actually believe that or anything.
	They're just liars.
	I have trouble calling it hypocrisy because hypocrisy is like a, I don't know, it's a thing that everybody engages in to some extent.
	It's almost like dismisses what's happening.
	Ah, they're just hypocrites.
	No, they're not just hypocrites.
	It's like that Norm Macdonald joke.
	He's talking about Bill Cosby.
	Being a rapist and he's like, the worst part was the hypocrisy.
	It's like, really?
	I thought it was the rape.
	I thought that was the worst part.
	It's like, I'm pretty sure all rapists are hypocrites.
	There's not a lot of people out there going, I love rape.
	I love raping.
	It's not about the hypocrisy.
	It's like a rapist isn't a hypocrite.
	It's, they're just, they're just violent.
	They're just attacking you.
	They're just evil.
	These people are just evil.
	They just do what they can because they can.
	A bully picking on a little kid isn't a hypocrite.
	That bully would also cry if he got bullied.
	Is that hypocrisy?
	I guess.
unidentified		I don't know.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		I just don't like calling it hypocrisy.
		That feels like it's in a way like giving them an out almost.
		It doesn't express the full scale of deliberate fraud, deliberate Deception and manipulation that they're engaged in.
		Now, some stuff has been coming out about Hunter during this trial.
		Prosecutors revealed to the jury that Hunter Biden didn't just sleep with his late brother, Beau's wife, Haley.
		He also got her hooked on crack.
		First family.
		First family in the United States.
		Haley is set to testify in this case, and mysteriously, Joe Biden visited her a few days ago, most likely trying to buy her silence about the family dealings.
unidentified		You know?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		know it's uh i'm just i'm trying i'm just being silent because i'm trying not to just say the same thing over and over This is insane.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I mean, this is just- it is be- We're so far beyond parody at this point.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		Like, this is beyond Requiem for a Dream.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It's like- I mean, this in particular is, like, actually sickening.
		When you think about what actually has gone on with the Biden family.
		I mean, it's- It's like American Horror Story.
		This is like- This makes House of Cards look like a, you know, the Teletubbies or something.
		It's so horrifyingly bad.
		And what I don't get is why you've got people who for four years under Trump, they're just like, oh, they're terrible.
		They're despicable.
		Because it's like, Eric Trump went big trophy hunting one time.
		There's like, these are the worst people in the world.
		Joe Biden.
		is a mental retard.
		He is physically incapable of walking across a lawn and not getting lost.
		He literally cannot string a sentence together.
		He is starting World War III on his watch.
		He is the most vicious hateful person to ever hold the Oval Office.
		I have to believe that.
		Because at least other presidents, I mean, maybe they were bastards behind the scenes, but they put on a really good sheen, a really good look, a good disguise when they would go out in public.
		Joe Biden doesn't even disguise it.
		I mean, he's asked.
		I don't even think I played the video or covered it extensively.
		Certainly not enough.
		After Trump gets convicted and they go, you know, a reporter asks Biden, Are you jailing your political opponents?
		And he just looks back and is just like... And just walks off and it's like, what the... Or anytime anybody contradicts him and he gets the finger in the face and starts cursing at him.
		I mean this dude... Just like radiates evil.
		And incompetence and failure and vulnerability and weakness.
		We have a frail old evil psychopath, pedophile by the way.
		Because that's another thing that's happened to Hunter Biden.
		Everything, the laptop and the journal have been entered in as evidence.
matt infowars ▲ ● ▼		They're real.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Been confirmed to be real.
		As if we needed them confirmed again for the umpteenth time.
		Which, you know, again, where is Republican Congress censuring and Doing something for the 50 intelligence agents that wrote an open letter saying that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.
		They just do whatever they want.
		They just lie with impunity, knowingly.
		Again, is that hypocritical?
		No, it's just lies.
		They're just lying.
		They just spout these just outrageous lies.
		Nobody calls them on it.
		Nobody does anything about it.
		We over here point out, hey, that's a lie, you know?
		And Republicans go, yeah, we know, they're lying.
		And then it's just like nothing happens.
		Okay, so they've interfered with an election by knowingly lying for the benefit of one politician over another, one candidate over another.
		Officially, in their official position, as intelligence agents of the United States, engaged in the political world, engaged in the electoral process, In a blatantly, knowingly, willfully dishonest way, what has happened to any of, any single one of them?
		Have they even had their finger weighed?
		Have we even seen a strongly worded letter about that?
		I don't think they've gone that far.
		Why aren't they in prison?
		Why aren't they brought up on charges?
		Using their official position to sway the American election in a totally fabricated false way.
		That's all beside the point.
		But it's been revealed that everything in the journals is accurate, and the Hunter Biden laptop is accurate, all that we've known forever.
		But just the idea that we have not only this, this... Words fail me.
		I mean, this human skeleton, this... Lich.
		He's a lich is what he is, Joe Biden.
		A vampire.
		In office, starting World War III, and smirking at the comment that he is jailing his political opponents.
		Just telling the whole world, telling the whole American press, yeah, I am.
		Yeah, I'm imprisoning my political opponents.
		And you're going along with me.
		And you're gonna let me do it.
		And you're not going to say crap about it.
		But then you look at his family.
unidentified		Thank you.
unidentified		Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Then you look at his family.
		And I'm not saying the Trumps are saints, but compared to these people, Hunter Biden, when he's not doing coke with Malia Obama, or taking racy pictures with his niece and her 12 year old friends, is getting his widowed sister-in-law addicted to crack so he can have sex with her.
		When he's not abandoning his child that he spawned with a whore.
		When he's not just cracked out of his mind filming himself naked.
		I mean, it's like, like literally, I don't even know what to say.
		It's like, it's so bad.
		It's so insane.
		It may, I mean, forget like comparing them to Trump.
		You can't even compare this family to Caligula.
		Like, this is ancient Rome level of WTF.
		Sleeping with your family members?
		A month after your brother dies, you're sleeping with his widow and getting her addicted to crack?
		I mean, these people are horrifying.
		It's like, it...
		Actually kind of makes me feel sick.
		Reading the journal, reading about the probably not appropriate showers with my dad.
		Was I molested?
		Yes, I think I was.
		That's a quote.
		That's a direct quote verbatim from the journal.
		He's sitting in the highest office in our land.
		He is the most powerful person in the world.
		And he is just a font of generational trauma.
		Think about how this dude treats his own family.
		Think about the fact that in the Hunter Biden laptop and the emails, even Hunter Biden, the now favored son, who's receiving all of these benefits from his dad, receiving all this protection from Joe Biden, it's pretty clear in the email, like, they hate their dad.
		At least you don't have to share 10% with the big guy.
		Imagine that being your family.
		Imagine your family, ...being either corrupt financial relationships between family members.
		They're sleeping with each other and their kids.
		High on crack and engaged in human trafficking.
		This is the first family in the United States.
		I think one of the reasons that I struggled to even wrap my mind around the level of dishonesty that we see out of these people is because the level of dishonesty they're able to reach requires the full-scale cooperation of a corrupt system.
		They shouldn't be able to get away with this.
		But they do.
		They do because Nobody calls them on it, which I don't understand.
		I really don't understand.
		Do these people like being lied to?
		I mean, are they okay with this?
		And part of me thinks they are.
		Like part of me thinks that the indoctrination has gone so deep that the demoralization and confusion is so pervasive in American society That Americans are saying they're going, well, they have to lie.
		It's, you know, we, we can't know what's good for us.
		You know, if they have to lie, it's because they love us so much and they're doing what's right.
		So it's okay.
		It's okay that they lie.
		It's because, you know, we can't know the truth.
		I've actually had conversations like that with people where they're like trying to justify things like false flags.
		I'm serious.
		If you start talking to people about this sort of stuff, the things that they can justify, normal people, good people, people with families, kids, and yet they'll sit there and go, well, you know, if there's a real danger from a terrorist group, but people aren't taking it seriously, you know, is it not if there's a real danger from a terrorist group, but people aren't taking it seriously, you know, is it not better to, you know, make, you know, show an example of how dangerous they can be so then you can get the support to go after them because at the end,
		And if you don't have an attack, people don't know how dangerous it is.
		I've had that conversation with people.
		Where it's just like, no, dude, what are you talking about?
		You're justifying a false flag attack on the basis that the authorities know better than us, and we just won't listen, and they can't convince us, so they have to force us into it.
		Like, what are you talking about?
		I've had that conversation with somebody.
		Normal dude.
		Typically a good dude, but this is, this is how people justify this stuff.
		Well, you know, the people in charge, they know the real threats and, you know, if they need to lie in order to defeat those threats, then that's their response.
		Then they have to lie.
		Then I'm glad they're lying.
		That's kind of how people are.
		So, you know, I've got this clip of my orcas with Neil Cavuto and the whole thing's like, 10 minutes long and I can't get to the whole thing.
		I almost want to play the whole thing because, again, the level of lying, so egregious, so outrageous.
		Such a deliberate inversion of reality.
		That, you know, it's the emperor has new, you know, clothes or, or, you know, the emperor's new clothes or, I mean, it's Soviet level stuff.
	It's Soviet level stuff.
	We're the classic thing.
	You know, they're lying.
	We know they're lying.
	They know we know they're lying, but they're still lying.
	It's that.
	That's what's happening here.
	Alejandro Mayorkas says to Neil Cavuto, we have taken border policy seriously and have done everything we can to stop border crossers from day one.
	Now, day one, Joe Biden signed a whole raft of executive orders undoing Trump's border security.
	I don't think I need to tell you this, but I don't know.
	Do people believe him?
	Do people believe Alejandro Mayorkas when he very solemnly declares how seriously he takes the humanitarian crisis at the border?
	I mean, do they believe that?
	I guess probably.
	I mean, I don't know.
	Ted Bundy has girlfriends in prison.
	You've got mass murderers, like the most evil people in the world, sitting there going, we are doing everything we can.
	John Wayne Gacy, he's got 30 kids buried in his basement.
	Would you trust him to babysit your kid?
	Do you not get evil?
	Do you not understand how these people operate?
	Are you gonna let John Wayne Gacy, after the 29th kid goes missing, He goes, hey, no, I'm running.
	I just love, I'm trying so hard to protect these kids.
	I mean, it's just, it's so overt and obvious and blatant.
	It's, it's like painful.
	It's like actually, it like hurts my head the way these people lie.
	I mean, just lying about Biden's competency.
	I just, I cannot imagine it.
	I cannot imagine it.
	And it's pervasive, and this is the thing.
	Isn't this in everything?
	Don't they know it's a lie that men are women?
	I mean, don't they know that?
	Don't they know by now that COVID came from a lab?
	Didn't they always know that?
	They know the border's open.
	They know the prosecution of Trump is illegitimate.
	They know that Biden's a criminal who sold out our country.
	They know all of this.
	And so I don't know how to deal with this.
	It's just like so much else that we cover with M4, as I've said a million times, that like, it used to be that, and the assumption was, if I can expose the lie, if I can tell you the truth and make you see what's going on, then you'll respond to that.
	The idea, I thought, was that people didn't like being lied to, and that you would oust people who lied to you.
	And that by exposing the lie, you would learn what the truth is.
	You'd be mad at the person who was concealing it from you.
	That's just not how it works.
	So I don't know what to do.
	I don't know what to do when you have Alejandro Mayorkas sitting up there saying that Joe Biden is doing everything he can to protect the border and that this is a humanitarian crisis for which there is no solution.
	I mean, I don't know what to do about that because it's just so blatantly dishonest.
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	What do you do?
	And I can't, I can't imagine being these people.
	I cannot.
	Because they got to get some satisfaction from this, right?
	They're not doing it Just to do it, like, they gotta, like, he probably feels good.
	You know, it's like the question of, like, when Stalin was receiving 30-minute standing ovations because everybody was scared they'd be killed if they stopped clapping.
	Did he feel like that was legitimate?
	Did he think that those cheers were real?
	Was he getting satisfaction from the fact that he was able to terrify everybody so much that they had to clap for him?
	You know?
	You know what I'm saying?
	When this guy gets up and just says a blatant, blatant lie.
	When they write a letter saying Hunter Biden's laptop is Russian disinformation that they know to be false.
	Do they get some sort of satisfaction?
	Is that some sort of power move?
	Is this gaslighting giving them some sort of dopamine rush?
	So I try to imagine if I got up here and I can't even think of a lie as outrageous.
	As that without being like trite without, you know, just like if I sit up here and was just like, I'm wearing a swimsuit.
	I'm wearing a swimsuit, right?
	I'm not wearing a tie.
	Look, look, anybody who says I wear ties is a liar.
	Okay?
	I've never worn a tie in my life.
	I don't even know how to tie a tie.
	I certainly would never wear one around my neck with a dress shirt.
	I never would do that.
	Okay?
	Neil, Neil Cavuto asked me about ties.
	I abhor ties and I would never ever wear one.
	That's the level of gaslighting that we're at.
	Literally, that's the level.
	Where a guy wearing a tie is saying they're telling you he's never put a tie on in his life.
	I mean, and everybody going along with it.
	Again, I can't think of a good example.
	I feel like if Alex Jones in Connecticut got up on stand and was like, I never mentioned Sandy Hook.
	I never said anything.
	I never said one word about that shooting.
	It's like, dude, you know, it's like there's a level of lying where it's like, what?
	Again, I don't know how to deal with it.
	So, you know, if I were to say I've never worn a tie, I don't wear ties.
	I've never even seen a tie.
	And everybody else around me is like, yeah, true.
	I trust him.
	He's a trustworthy man.
	He's accurate when he says that.
	The person looking at me wearing a tie would just, they would feel crazy, right?
	I mean, that's the thing.
	It makes you feel crazy when the lies are so blatant.
	And the people with the most power in our country just say them with abandon.
	And the media acts like it's true.
	I don't know.
	I don't know how to deal with this.
	How do you deal with a society that doesn't care if it's lied to?
unidentified		All right, folks, welcome back.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I just want to remind you, according to the establishment here in America, I think we're The Ukraine war was entirely an act of Russian aggression with absolutely no misbehavior by America beforehand.
		Israel is defending itself.
		Men can get pregnant.
		The border is secure, but also the reason the border is not secure is the Republicans.
		White men are the most dangerous threat in America.
		I mean, they believe these things.
		Donald Trump is a criminal who is a Russian agent.
		Hunter Biden is an angel who never did anything wrong and his dad never even spoke to him about his business ventures.
		Where does it end, right?
		Where does it end?
		How is it so ubiquitous?
		How is it every single one of these things is predicated on ridiculous and blatant lies?
		How is it?
		That they're able to maintain this.
		I don't understand.
		I really don't.
		Let's talk about the very dangerous reality, as opposed to the lies.
		The lie is, as Alejandro Mayorkas will very righteously tell you, down his nose, he's always got that, it's just like, he's got that way of looking where it's just like, you know I'm lying, but I'm still gonna lie to you.
		And there's nothing you can do about it.
		It's that sort of look.
		He says they're doing everything they can to secure the border and that it's Republicans' fault that the border isn't secure.
		Well, that's a lie, obviously.
unidentified		Obviously, like everything this man says.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Everything.
		The truth about the Amnesty bill Biden signed is this.
		It enshrines new and so they blamed on the Republicans and said the Republicans didn't pass the border bill and that's why the border is unsecure.
		And then they signed an executive order that proves that that's not the case at all.
		But regardless, it enshrines catch and release into federal law.
		It allows at least 5,000 illegal entries per day.
		That's 1.8 million per year.
		New authority for Biden to grant asylum to unlimited numbers of illegals.
		That's what it actually does.
		taking Biden's migrants into voting citizens, grants millions of work permits for Biden illegal stealing jobs and wages from American workers, provides taxpayer funds to fly and house illegal aliens, replaces immigration judges with asylum officers to rubber stamp fake asylum claims, and provides taxpayer-funded attorneys replaces immigration judges with asylum officers to rubber stamp fake asylum claims, and That's what it actually does.
		That's what this bill actually did.
		So they couch everything under fake law and then act like they're just adhering to the law.
		We're just doing the process as it's supposed to be.
		The intention of the process is supposed to be that when there's a population that's being hunted down and exterminated by their government, then we temporarily suspend immigration restrictions to allow them to escape imminent demise.
		That's the way it's supposed to work.
		How it works now is that taxpayer money is taken, given to the UN, who funnels it to trafficking organizations, who bring people into the country, tell them what to say.
		People on the other side of the border in America are told, when these people say this, you grant them asylum, and they rubber stamp it, giving a facsimile of legitimacy to what is obviously on the face of it in reality, blatant treason.
		The asylum system has to be ended.
		It has to be over and everybody who's claimed asylum in the last 10 years has to be sent back.
		That has to be the policy.
		There's no... And again, if we had a moral country, if we had a country that even gave the slightest damn about what is true or real or right or good or reasonable or anything, then we could have asylum.
		We could have an asylum program because it could accurately be applied and we could actually do some good in the world.
		But we can't have that with these people in charge.
		With these people in charge, there can't be asylum.
		Just like you can't leave your door unlocked in certain neighborhoods.
		You just can't.
		So we have to get rid of asylum and we have to undo every asylum claim.
		Because they're not valid.
		It's as simple as that.
		They're not valid, they're false.
		It's orchestrated.
		They have to go.
		They have to be expelled.
		They have to be deported.
		Extremely rapidly.
		With bias.
		Right?
		With whatever.
		What do they say?
		Dismissing this case with no... We just have to do it.
		It just has to be done.
		Okay?
		So my orcas went on the Fox News channel.
		To talk about this.
		With Neil Cavuto.
		Because one of the aspects of this new bill that's been signed gives asylum and provides an exemption for unaccompanied minors.
		They are incentivizing the cartels and the human traffickers and the illegal aliens.
		They are incentivizing the trafficking of children.
		They are incentivizing the kidnapping of children and the sending of children across the border by themselves.
		That is the purpose of this.
		They're doing it on purpose.
		They're doing it by design.
		I mean, they know what the outcome is going to be.
		So let's hear Alejandro Mayorkas lie about this to our faces, and then we'll discuss the reality of what he is Giving rise to here.
		Let's watch.
unidentified		So the one thing I didn't understand, there are a number of exemptions for this, including, you know, unaccompanied children.
		And isn't that a green light for drug cartels to take advantage of that?
		And, you know, the whole purpose of this, it sort of blows up in your face.
alejandro mayorkas ▲ ● ▼		Oh, absolutely not.
unidentified		Who's going to watch those unaccompanied children?
		They are allowed in.
		You don't ship them back.
		You don't do anything like that.
		So where do they go?
alejandro mayorkas ▲ ● ▼		Neil, we deal with unaccompanied children in a humanitarian way, adhering to our values.
		We deter irregular migration.
		We build lawful pathways.
unidentified		But this encourages drug cartels to take advantage of those kids, does it not, sir?
alejandro mayorkas ▲ ● ▼		Neil, we're taking it to the drug cartels with unprecedented strength through our transnational criminal investigative units.
unidentified		No, no, this is actually a green light for those cartels.
		Isn't that the fear?
		That this was actually green lighting?
		And say, oh God, we can use these kids as pawns to get what we want.
alejandro mayorkas ▲ ● ▼		Neil, let's be clear.
		The cartels, the smuggling organizations are unscrupulous.
		They exploit individuals of all different types of vulnerabilities.
		We are taking it to the cartels.
		We accepted unaccompanied children from this asylum bar because of the compelling humanitarian That's just a lie.
		We can take it down.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I don't know how much more I can express it.
		Like, it's just a lie.
		He's just lying.
		He just knows what he... I mean, what does that even mean?
		We're taking it to the cartels.
		How?
		In what way?
		What are you talking about?
		No, you're not.
unidentified		What?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		What are they talking about?
		They're incentivizing cartels to bring unaccompanied minors now.
		By telling them, you don't think the cartels know?
		Of course they know.
		We talk to people on the border all the time.
		They say, yeah, they're checking updates constantly.
		They know exactly what the law is, exactly where to go, exactly what they can do, and exactly where they can do it.
		They know this.
		So you're telling the cartels that unaccompanied minors are a ticket into this country, no questions asked.
		That's the incentivization they're giving.
		He says they exploit people of all types.
		So you're giving them license to do that?
		You're giving them an excuse to do it explicitly to children?
		These people are sick.
		Here's the reality at the border.
		In 2019, They implemented a DNA testing protocol at the border to test whether or not the children being brought into this country were actually with their parents.
		Upwards of 30% of illegal aliens arriving with children they claimed were theirs were in fact not related to the children, nor were they step parents or adoptive parents.
		One out of every three children brought across this, the southern border, at a time when they didn't have exemptions for children, At times when it wasn't incentivized to bring them.
		One out of every three kids was with somebody who was not their parent, but was saying that they were.
		Not just like, oh, this is my, you know, this is just a kid I found on the way I'm bringing him in.
		No, they said, no, I'm this kid's parents.
		They do the DNA testing.
		One out of three kids was with a stranger.
		Lying and saying that it was his kid or her kid.
		The Biden administration, of course, terminated that program.
		One of the first things they did when they got into office was to stop the DNA testing that was proving that one out of every three kids was not with their parents.
		Do you understand why I'm, like, at a loss for words?
		They are incentivizing mass-scale human trafficking of children.
		and they're righteously looking down at their nose and sneering at you for trying to stop them.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Attorney General, you've told us that it's a dangerous conspiracy theory to allege that the Department of Justice is communicating with these state and local prosecutions against Trump You can clear it all up for us right now.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Will the Department of Justice provide to the committee all documents, all correspondence between the department and Alvin Bragg's office and Fannie Willis' office and Letitia James' office?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		The offices you're referring to are independent offices of state.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		I get that.
		I get that.
		The question is whether or not you will provide all of your documents and correspondence.
		That's the question.
		I don't need a history lesson.
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		Well, I'm gonna say again.
		We do not control those offices.
		They make their own decisions.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		The question is whether you communicate with them, not whether you control them.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Do you communicate with them and will you provide those communications?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		If you make a request, we'll refer it to our Office of Legislative Affairs.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		But see, here's the thing.
		You come in here and you lodge this attack that it's a conspiracy theory that there is coordinated lawfare against Trump.
		And then when we say, fine, just give us the documents, give us the correspondence.
		And then if it's a conspiracy theory, that will be evident.
		But when you say, well, we'll take your request and then we'll sort of work it through the DOJ's accommodation process, then you're actually advancing the very dangerous conspiracy theory that you're concerned about.
		Now, you were a judge once nominated the highest court in our country.
		When you were a judge, I'm just curious.
		Did you ever make political donations to partisan candidates?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		No.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		No?
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		And you didn't because that would create the potential appearance of impropriety.
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		I didn't because there's a federal rule barring federal judges from making contributions.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Right, but under that same theory of A tax on the judicial process?
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Like, shouldn't someone be owed, like, a jury of their peers and a judge that's non-biased, rather than getting a judge from your political opponent's donor file?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		I'm well aware that you're not asking a hypothetical.
		You're asking me to comment on a jury verdict in a...
		Another jurisdiction which has to be respected.
		I won't comment on it.
		That case is still ongoing.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Mr. Attorney General, I hadn't asked you about the verdict yet.
		We were getting there.
		I was talking about the judge.
		So let me ask you this question about your time as a judge.
		Was there ever a time when you were a judge when you had a family member who was personally profiting off of the notoriety of a case that was before your court?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		I'm going to say it again.
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		Very clear, you're asking me to comment on a case in another jurisdiction... No, no, no!
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Hold on, hold on, Mr. Attorney General.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Did you ever have a family member profit off of the notoriety of any case that you settled?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		Say again, you're asking me... Yes or no?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		You're asking me to comment on a case currently... Well, it seems you're connecting the dots, Mr. Attorney General.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		I'm just asking you as to a general principle, but you are aware that Judge Marchand's daughter was profiting off of this prosecution.
		You are aware that that creates the appearance of impropriety.
		You know the very reason there's a federal rule against judges giving donations is because it is the very attack on the judicial process that we're concerned about.
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry, I don't agree with anything you just said, but I'm not going to comment on it.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Okay, so you won't comment on it, Mr. Attorney General, but you had no problem dispatching Matthew Colangelo.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Who's Matthew Colangelo?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		That is false.
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		I did not dispatch Matthew Colangelo.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Matthew Colangelo became the Assistant Attorney General at the very beginning of the Biden administration.
		Without having been Senate-confirmed, goes and gets this senior role at the DOJ, and then after, I believe it's, uh, Gupta replaces Colangelo, Colangelo makes this remarkable downstream career journey from the U.S.
		Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., and then pops up in Alvin Bragg's office to go get Trump.
		And you're saying that's just a—that's just a career choice that was made that has nothing to do with the lawfare coordinated by the— I'm saying it's false.
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		I did not dispatch Mr. Colangelo anywhere.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Well, do you know how he ended up there?
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		I assume he spoke, uh, he applied for a job there and got the job.
merrick garland ▲ ● ▼		But see, you know what- I can tell you I had nothing to do with it.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, you might not have had anything to do with it, but we've got this case- He's lying, he knows we know he's lying, and yet he lies.
unidentified		He lies, he lies, he lies.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		He knows exactly how improper this all was.
		He knows exactly how it looks, because that's exactly how it was.
		Remember, Merchant was randomly assigned every one of Trump's cases in New York, even though he wasn't even in the rotation of judges that are supposed to be randomly assigned.
		He was chosen, he was picked, just like this guy from the DOJ was picked to handle this persecution of their political enemies.
		This is what tyranny looks like.
		Welcome back, folks.
		Third hour of American Journal is on.
		I'll be taking your phone calls throughout this hour.
		If you want to call in, the number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
unidentified		1-877-789-2539.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		You know what?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		If you want to call in, the number to dial is 1-877-789-2539, 1-877-789-2539.
unidentified		You know what?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I forgot to ask the crew to do this, but I want to show the video of the stabbing attack that took place in Germany a few days ago.
		I believe it was on Saturday.
		We've had the video the last couple days.
		I haven't played it.
		I haven't gotten to it, even though I've wanted to.
		I've run out of time before we've gotten to it the last few days, but the story keeps sort of accelerating.
		It keeps changing and getting worse.
		Predictably so.
		So in case you don't know about this, there was a right-wing activist who was stabbed by an Afghan asylum seeker.
		This is the video here.
		There was a rally for AFD, I believe, or some right-wing organization.
		There's the Afghani Muslim invader stabbing the people involved.
		Slice him open.
		Pretty brutal imagery.
		But we're showing it to you.
		Specifically because the German government doesn't want us to.
		Klaus Arminius, TwitterX, has been ordered by the German government to delete videos of the immigrant stabbing Germans.
		And a couple aspects of this.
		are of interest, even just from the video alone.
		One is that you've got the Afghan guy stabbing political activists.
		The police then run up and some of the political activists are trying to fight back against the stabber.
		The police run up, grab the German guy, throw the Guy trying to stop the terrorists onto the ground, then the police himself is then stabbed in the neck.
		By the knifeman.
		So here you see, you know, one of the German guys trying to wrestle with the guy with the knife, then the cops tackle the German guy, and the cop gets stabbed in the neck.
		Could not be a more accurate portrayal of Europe at this time.
		Now, sadly, that police officer has died from his wounds.
		Because he tackled the German guy.
		Because, of course, it must be the German guy that's bad.
		Now, when this happened, all of the headlines that were printed about this were framed in a way to leave people with the assumption and the belief that the police were stabbed by right-wingers.
		Because just about every Yes, the police were stabbed at a right-wing event by a Muslim invader who was stabbing the right-wingers.
		Because the media's job is to tell you the truth, believe you, believing a lie.
		Yes, the police were stabbed at a right-wing event by a Muslim invader who was stabbing the right-wingers.
		The entire European information economy at this point is dedicated to concealing the crimes of foreigners and accusing the natives of crimes when they have done nothing wrong.
		But the influence worked.
		The lie did its job.
		And after right-wingers came together to a political event...
		In the city square, and were attacked viciously by migrants, there were massive anti-right-wing protests in Germany.
		The right-wingers were attacked, and the German left-wingers were on the side of the attacker.
		They're protesting against the victims of this.
		This is how warped and perverted and sick these people's minds are.
		And that's the thing.
		They actually have articles that blame the right-wingers.
		They say they were antagonizing the Muslims.
		The cop who was stabbed by the Muslim in the neck and died because he was wrestling the innocent German who was trying to protect himself.
		During his funeral, a Muslim imam gave the prayer.
		German newspapers actually referred to the Mannerheim city center as Muslim territory.
		And they said it's your fault for interrupting and being a nuisance in their territory.
		You deserve to be stabbed.
		This Afghan Islamist who did the stabbing Killed this police officer in Mannheim, had lived in the country illegally for at least eight years.
		The attacker, Solomon Atei, who attacked Sturzenberger during the incident, who appeared to be his main target.
		The shocking incident cannot be embedded on websites, likely due to EU or German censorship efforts, but it can still be viewed on X. Of course, we'll show it to you here because this is America.
		We like the truth here.
		We like to see what's actually happening, not the perverted, distorted, warped view of reality that is mandated by law in Europe, where they make it illegal to show you the effects of their policies so that the policies can continue.
		And Australia as well, right?
		This happened with the stabbing of Mario Manuel, the preacher who was stabbed in the middle of a sermon.
		They also Sent out censorship orders to take that video off the internet in Australia.
		So they'll set the policy.
		You might get stabbed as a consequence.
		Then they'll hide the video and demand people not talk about it because they want that policy to continue.
		Because the purpose of a system is what it does.
		Because the reason that they're bringing people in is to attack and subdue and destroy the natives of Europe.
		And so they demonized the right wing for daring to speak out.
		Shouldn't they have known that they were going to get stabbed?
		It's their fault for antagonizing innocent Muslims.
	With top German politicians demanding maximum penalty for young people expressing their discontent with unrestricted migration.
	Despite the fact that that is a majority view in Germany.
	German politicians are calling for a group of young people protesting against unrestricted immigration to be imprisoned.
	Possibly even given the maximum sentence for a variety of alleged crimes.
	The crimes being, wanting a country.
	Wanting to not be invaded and stabbed.
	German Chancellor Olaf Scholz even stepped in to condemn the video of this stabbing.
	Or I'm sorry, a video of the youths singing along with Ausländer Raus.
	He called these kids, and they're singing, repugnant and not acceptable.
	He calls this radicalization.
	The young kids are being accused of violating section 86A of the German criminal code, which refers to unconstitutional symbols.
	If found guilty, the youths could be sentenced to up to three years in prison.
	If the kids are also found guilty of incitement against the people, they could be given another five years.
	To their prison sentence.
	So they want to send... I mean, they are.
	They are sending kids to prison for eight years for singing a song.
	President Barbel Bass of the ruling left-wing Social Democratic Party has called for these youths to receive the harshest punishment possible, meaning at least eight years in prison, saying, Saying quote the video exists and certain people can be identified Such things anti-constitutional slogans are to be punished.
	I hope they get a decent punishment Throw young kids in prison for eight years For singing a song but it's not the song it's the idea of the song represents they are flooding Europe with violent migrants the tune of tens of millions and The vast majority of Europeans are against this.
	They want this process slowed, if not stopped and reversed.
	But if you oppose their policy, they will send you to jail for eight years.
	That's what that means.
	And this came after the stabbing in Mannheim.
	So you've got the stabbing in Mannheim, you've got the Very illustrative example of a police officer attacking the German who himself is the victim.
	And then the police officer himself being stabbed and dying.
	And then at his funeral, a Muslim gives the address in Arabic.
	Then you have people protesting against the right wing.
	You have politicians demonizing the right wing.
	You have publications framing the attack as if it was right-wingers who did it.
	And now an AFD candidate has been stabbed in the abdomen after confronting election poster vandals.
	A candidate for the right-wing alternative for Deutschland, AFD, was stabbed in the German city of Mannheim, same place, late Tuesday evening, just days after the city witnessed a similar attack by Islamists who killed a policeman.
	So this is on purpose.
	Right?
	You have a stabbing attack, and instead of saying, hey, these right-wingers need protection, They're acting peacefully, they're acting in accordance with our political system.
	You're allowed to hold rallies.
	We have to stand up against violent assault whose entire purpose, I mean, literal terrorism, right?
	Shutting down political action by attacking you.
	And the whole of the establishment is actually on the side of the stabber.
	Very openly.
	The stabber's just doing what The rest of the government's doing just in a more sort of efficient way.
	So they demonize the victims.
	And then days later, there's another victim.
	Of course there's going to be.
	You're demonizing them.
	You're giving justification to the stabbing.
	Literal stochastic terrorism.
	They see a terrorist attack.
unidentified		Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And they demonize the victims.
		So of course it's going to happen again.
		And this is just the latest in a long series of stories that we've covered about AFD being demonized and victimized continuously by their government or the brainwashed masses.
		Take the government's statements seriously.
		They believe when they say AFD is dangerous and it's there.
		These people are domestic terrorists and they're.
		Racist and Nazis may have to be stopped.
		When they get stabbed, don't worry about it will cover for you will make it sound like.
		It's your fault.
		Tino Trupala, you The co-chair of AFD and lead spokesperson.
		Says quote our members and representatives are the most frequent victims of violent of political violence and vandalism that cannot stop us She also says by agitating against the opposition German Chancellor Olaf Schultz traffic light coalition government and media are creating a climate in which even extreme physical attacks are no longer shied away from We condemn this violence and call on people to finally return to basic democratic practices Good luck with that
		Good luck with that.
		It's sad, but you just have to realize that this is the world that we're in.
		The powers that be are doing everything they can to incentivize attacks against right-wingers.
		And it really is that, I mean, it really is just another Norm Macdonald joke this show, but You know, he'd always say, I just worry if Muslims set off a bomb in New York City, a dirty bomb, a nuke in New York City.
		I just worry about the backlash against peaceful Muslims.
		And that's literally what's happening here.
		And it happens across the Western world.
		You see it over and over where like a Muslim person commits a terrorist attack.
		And then the response from the establishment is to send guards around to protect mosques in case there's retribution, in case there's retribution.
		I mean, there never is.
		That's not what we do.
		That's not what Europeans do.
		There's never even a threat of that.
		But this is how insane it is.
		Violent Muslims attack and they're the ones that the establishment is concerned about.
		Just wrap your mind around that.
		When the obvious response should be to protect the people who are getting stabbed.
		It shouldn't be that difficult, but it is apparently.
		This is impossible for Germans to wrap their mind around.
		So, that's what you get, I guess, for losing that war 70 years ago.
		Let's go to the phone lines.
		Number one, Mongoose.
		You want to talk about this new Mexican president.
		Thanks for calling in.
		You're on the air, Mongoose.
icarus in wisconsin ▲ ● ▼		Hey, Harrison.
		How you doing today?
		Yeah, I think there's a like a big occult Tie in with the Mexican president, not only because there was like all those assassinations and like the cartels being like, like muerte, worship, worshiping of death.
		So I think like there's going to be like a new satanic communism going on in Mexico because of this.
		And it's a topic that people really don't talk about.
		You know, which is all the, uh, witchcraft and, um, satanic.
		You guys talk about it, of course, you know, and Alex Jones talked about like Rex 84 and in history, the gates of Toledo and what happened in the Balkans.
		And now it's just the modern version of that with like replacement with my work is now in this Mexican president.
		Most likely I'm just taking a wild guess, but, um, you know, it's, Pervasive in our society going on in the media and everything, the Satanism and witchcraft.
		And I don't know if you know this, I'm here in Wisconsin, and Wisconsin has apparently over 300 covens here, more than the entirety of Europe.
		There's a lot of that stuff going on.
		You kind of feel it in certain areas and you'll go to places and there'll be witches and stuff and, you know, Unfortunately, you know, the only way to deal with evil, you know, like obviously as Christians, you know, we're supposed to be turning the other cheek and everything, but also, you know, there's the Archangel Michael and when there's a demon, the demon has to be slain or removed.
		You know, obviously we can't do it in a violent way because it will only yield more violence as you see what's going on in Israel and Gaza right now where You know, Israel has become the monsters they railed against during World War II, you know, committing this holocaust now in Gaza, especially with the recent burnings and what happened in Rafah.
		You know, it's like ten Srebrenica's in Bosnia.
		So I think, you know, I always think then, like, OK, what are we going to do about it?
		And it's actually a good position for us because we've been looking for a position where Christ would become relevant again in this age of AI and witchcraft and Satanism.
		There's never been a better time for Jesus, and I think that's really the only road, the only way.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		What do you think, Harrison?
		I completely agree with everything that you're saying, and it is something that doesn't get enough Discussion because the it's it sounds silly.
		It's like oh, there's witches everywhere, but it's like no there's like It's like really bad like especially with the cartels the cartels like they worship I came her with it
		Lady of death or something they call it but like if they found cartel compounds with rooms Where it's literally like a foot of bones like there's bones on the floor a foot deep because they do human sacrifices there's like a It's like a cultism like the worship of death and the worship of self and the worship of nature it's like always there under the surface and just like bubbles up when there's not a true religion to
		you know, keep it in check.
		And again, it's like, you know, it used to be they'd watch a award show You'd be like, oh, I see that little subtle hand symbol there.
		You know, it'd be somebody just getting up on stage and being like, really quick and just like, you didn't notice.
		I did a satanic symbol.
		Oh, but it was, but it was real subtle and you have to catch it.
		And if you don't catch it, you don't know.
		And now it's just like a giant pentagram with a goat head.
		And there's just like a Satan up there just like having gay sex.
		And they're just like, yeah, this is what we do now.
		This is it.
		It's all out in the open at this point.
		So yeah, there's a very real spiritual Lower dimension, you know, bubbling up from hell.
		And it's just the, you know, it's the thing, you know, whether you think it's spiritual or purely materialistic, the outcome is the same.
		A den of horror, human skulls, fetus in jar, and nightmarish altar discovered in Mexican cartel hideout.
		Yeah, it's pretty, pretty sick stuff, spiritually.
		You know, whether you see it as a spiritual punishment from God or just the material outcome of choices, it's the same.
		These are the same things, right?
		You can say that God inflicts the immoral with plagues, or you can point to the statistical overwhelming Amount of STDs in the gay community.
		It's just like, you can call that a plague or you can call it the outcome of a pervasive, a permissive lifestyle, but the outcome is the same.
		And we are headed towards damnation in a very real way.
		Thanks for the call, Mongoose.
		Baker in California says, what is happening in Europe will happen here.
		Go ahead, Baker, you're on the air.
unidentified		Yeah, like we've let in hordes of people.
		So, uh, no, a lot of that is going to be because in Europe, you know, what's messed up about that is that they're pretty much telling people, uh, Hey, you have to accept all these migrants.
		F you in your culture.
		If you say anything, you're going to be put on the terrorist list.
		I mean, we're talking revolutionary level stuff is going to start happening.
		So people have to decide.
		What they want to do, you know what I mean?
		So, you know, that's why I think that's pretty much where we're at right now.
		So we have to, you know, what kind of sucks about this shutting down, dude, is like, where are we going after this?
		Just X. Everyone's going to stay on X. I mean, why doesn't Elon Musk and Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan just all bail out Alex Jones?
		Not bail out, you know what I mean?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, it's not really, it's not really possible right now.
		I mean, it's sort of, you know, right now we have to just go through this process.
		We have to go through this process and whatever comes next, I'm sure there'll be a lot of people that will be happy to pitch in.
		So, you know, we'll, we'll, we'll come back bigger and stronger, bigger and better than ever before.
		I do want to, uh, I guess I should remind you that you can follow all of us on X. You can follow American Journal at InfoWarsJournal.
		You can follow me at Harrison H. Smith.
		You can subscribe to my sub stack, and that puts your email on a mailing list.
		So, that's the important thing to do right now, as InfoWars approaches the abyss, to make sure that we have alternative ways of contacting you and staying in touch.
		We'll be right back with more phone calls.
		Team American Journal, InfoWarsStore.com.
		Welcome back, folks.
		I want you to imagine that you're a farmer in Europe.
		You have a modest farm, maybe 60 acres.
		You grow food, your family's done this for generation upon generation for hundreds of years in the same plot of land.
		You've grown food and raised cattle.
		And then one day, some government bureaucrat comes along and says, to stop climate change, to save the weather, You can't be a farmer anymore.
		You have to shut down the business that your family built.
		You have to sell off your land to a developer so they can pack it with migrant housing.
		You have to move to a city.
		Gotta stop using nitrogen in your fertilizer.
		Your cows create too much methane, so they have to be cold.
		Oh, and what do you know?
		Bird flu's here, so we gotta kill all the chickens as well.
		You think this sounds ridiculous?
		Nonsensical.
		Suicidal in many ways.
		So you get in your tractor with some other farmer buddies and go protest.
		Guess what?
		You are now an evil far-right extremist, according to the government and the media, as this headline from the AP says.
		Tractors rumble in streets again ahead of EU polls.
		Farming is a big issue and the far-right pounces.
		Far right always pouncing always taking advantage of things I Always have to frame it this way right far right you are far.
		Yeah, you're not just right-wing You're not even a left way, I mean they're left-wing farmers voted you know Socialist his whole life.
		No you're a far-right extremist now Because you want to be able to farm That's the way this is going.
		And then, like, obviously, the reason that they're doing this is to destroy the food system.
		It's the only thing you can think of.
		There's only thing that explains everything going on.
		As we say all the time, ignore what these people say, look at what they do.
		Why are they rolling out half a dozen ways to target farmers all at the same time?
		How is it that climate change, and migration, and bird flu, how is it that all of these things all have exactly the same outcome?
		Which is to destroy the natural bounty of the earth.
		To eliminate farming on a small scale.
		Why are all of these things orchestrated in the exact same direction?
		Because that's the ultimate goal.
		Obviously.
		Obviously, right?
		So not only are they shutting down farms because of the nitrogen in the soil, or they're doing it because methane comes out of cows, you have to cull all of your cows, or just to make way for biodiversity.
		It's another excuse that they're using as they talk about literally, as I just noted, one of these farmers.
		One of who had 60 hectares or 148 acres that he used to farm for wheat, corn and potatoes, but he was forced to sell a quarter of it, including his farmhouse.
		To help make a string of distinct woods around Brussels to become one continuous nature zone to improve biodiversity and fight pollution.
		So whether it's biodiversity, or fighting pollution, or fighting disease, or fighting climate change and gas emissions, or nitrogen in the soil, or whatever excuse they can come up with, the end result is always the same, they're shutting your farm down.
		Because that's the point.
		And the excuse they use is arbitrary and interchangeable.
		There's a new threat to this, and that is solar farms.
		Solar farm expansion plans in UK under fire as farmers are being forced off their land.
		Some UK farmers are being pushed off their land as a misguided quest for more solar power presses forward in Britain.
		Here's a conversation about this and how utterly ridiculous and unnecessary this is.
		Do you have any idea how easy it is to put solar panels on buildings?
		Or land that isn't arable, doesn't have farms on it.
		They're doing this on purpose.
		They're targeting the farms and specifically going after the most fertile, the most bountiful places to eliminate the production of food in these places.
		They're doing it all under the umbrella of climate change, or most of it at least.
		And each excuse is more ridiculous than the last.
		Let's watch this comment, then we'll go back out to your phone calls.
unidentified		So yes, we have renewables as part of the mix, but the solution should not be taxing and punishing individuals, rather than actually looking at what sustains the environment.
		And based on solar panels and wind turbines, yes, have them, but I would suggest, well more than suggest, that we should not be having them on prime agricultural land that threatens our food security.
		We should be having them on roofs, on roads, on brownfields.
		That's a sensible solution.
		You know, and actually with net zero, I'm a great believer in giving power back to the people and direct democracy.
		So what about, Keir Starmer saying, We should have a referendum on net zero, considering that China, in terms of emissions, accounts for more than the developed world.
		28% of all pollution comes from China.
		They've got 1,100 coal-fueled power stations.
		They're busy building 300 more.
		That is another source of great frustration for people in this country who say, why are you making us live like cavemen in huts, effectively?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		While allowing China not just to pollute, not just to create the coal-fired power plants, but the plastics in the ocean, 90% of it comes from China.
		China has fishing fleets that are depopulating the ocean systematically around the entire world in international waters.
		Nothing's ever done to these people.
		No, instead, they are forcing the sale of prime real estate farmland to build solar farms.
		Because the point is destroying your ability to feed yourself.
		The point is they need everyone reliant on an interconnected system for survival.
		If you can grow your own food, you don't need them.
		But if instead all the food comes from Giant factory farms where they're creating fake meat, keeping pigs in tiny boxes and artificially inseminating them and just completely denuding it all of nature and ignoring the bounty of earth for some highly engineered replacement.
		If anybody's going to save Europe, it has to be the far right, which includes now any farmers that don't feel like being just completely destroyed.
		And of course, I mean, I just don't even make sense because as they're talking about destroying farms for solar panels, they're also in Scotland cut down 16 million trees to develop wind farms.
		Let's go out to your calls now.
		We've got a, Let's go to Tim in California, because I hadn't heard about this.
		You say there was a shootout in a Beirut embassy?
		Go ahead, you're on the air.
tim in california ▲ ● ▼		Yep, just after midnight your time there, about 8.30 local time in Beirut, Lebanon.
		And it's just reported the U.S.
		embassy said it was small arms fire.
		They did end up shooting the guy that they thought was doing it all.
		and took him into custody.
		And they don't know his motive wasn't immediately clear, but they did report that it was a Syrian national.
		But the reason why this story comes to mind is there was a deadly bombing at the US Embassy in Beirut back in 1983, and it killed 63 people!
		And, of course, the United States officials blamed it on Hezbollah, which basically is the exact same situation you're at today.
		They're blaming it on Hezbollah.
		And, you know, Netanyahu, he's got to say that, hey, Israel is prepared for strong action on Lebanon.
		I'll let you take it from there and piece that stew together, how that all works together.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, I'll tell you how it works together.
		Israel's about to take a really big loss.
		I hate to tell you.
		I hate to tell you.
		We'll get into it on the other side, but the whole north of Israel is depopulated and Hezbollah is about to invade.
		They're about to actually go Aggressive against Israel.
		And Israel's freaking out.
		We'll cover that on the other side.
unidentified		Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Final segment of American Journal.
		Israel and Lebanon, specifically Hezbollah, are creating blows at an increasingly aggressive rate.
		And it's all coming to a head.
		As this story from the Wall Street Journal says, Israel and Hezbollah move closer to a full-scale war.
		Israel and Hezbollah are moving closer to a full-scale war after months of escalating hostilities with the Lebanese militant group, adding pressure on Israel's government to secure its northern border.
		In recent weeks, both sides say there's been a sharp rise in hostilities.
		Hezbollah has increased its drone and rocket attacks, hitting important Israeli military installations.
		Israel, too, has stepped up the attacks, targeting Hezbollah sites deep into southern Lebanon's Bekaa Valley, as well as senior military officials in the group.
		Mostly civilians, though, is who they're targeting.
		Without a ceasefire in Gaza and subsequent deal with Hezbollah that meets Israel's requirement, Israeli officials say the offense is inevitable.
		Benny Gantz, a minister in Israel's war cabinet, says Israel will return residents to northern Israel by September 1st either, quote, through a deal or through an escalation.
		You're not going to get a deal.
		And you're not in a position to escalate.
		Wildfires sparked by Hezbollah drone and rocket attacks raged through northern Israel beginning Sunday.
		The blaze was largely contained by Tuesday morning and caused few injuries, but images spurred demands in Israel that after about eight months of low-intensity warfare with Hezbollah, which has left more than 60,000 Israelis displaced from their homes, the government needs to go on the offensive.
		Apparently the reason these wildfires were so widespread is because all the people in Israel Of course, originally came from Europe, and so they brought European trees with them, but it doesn't rain nearly as much in northern Israel as it does in Europe.
		And so what you're left with is a bunch of dried out forests.
		They're just waiting for a spark kindling.
		Waiting to be lit.
		So, you know, this whole article basically is talking about how, you know, both sides preparing for a major.
		Attack one way or the other.
		But if you sort of read between the lines, what you realize is that Hezbollah has not taken very much damage and has inflicted a great deal of damage in the recent past.
		And it seems as though they are gearing up and preparing to conquer parts of northern Israel.
		And there's not much Israel seems to be able or willing to do about it.
		France is sending messages to Israel begging them not to try to invade Lebanon, knowing how badly that would go.
		And if you really look into the capabilities and fortifications of Hezbollah, I mean, it makes Gaza look like a playground.
		Okay?
		So, Israel has not been able to eradicate Hamas even remotely from Gaza.
		There's still Hamas in northern Gaza, let alone southern Gaza.
		I mean, These are people who are in a, you know, essentially a prison camp.
		They're making their own missiles out of, you know, defunct water pipes.
		Hezbollah, not so disarmed, not so incapable.
		So take what's happening in Gaza and multiply it by like a thousand in both directions in terms of the destruction of innocent civilians on behalf of Israel and the Staying power of the militants on the side of the Palestinians or Lebanese.
		More than 100,000 Lebanese have been displaced from their homes because of the fighting and many rely on financial support from Hezbollah.
		The resident of a border town left his homeland in October following attacks between Hezbollah and Israel.
		He now lives in the city of Tyre with his wife and three children.
		My house was completely destroyed due to Israel targeting of the town, but the moment the ceasefire is reached, I plan to go back and rebuild it.
		The Israelis, however, say even a ceasefire would not convince them to move back to northern Israel.
		They say even if you Get a ceasefire with Hezbollah, we're still not going to go because you can't actually guarantee that ceasefire.
		You can't actually protect us from Hezbollah.
		So after about eight months of fighting, Hezbollah is still able to move its forces closer and farther from Israel's border as needed, according to Israeli Air Force intelligence officers.
		Each side has learned about the other's weaknesses, the officer said, while trying to avoid making any moves that could spark a full-scale war.
		Both sides are preparing and ready if something will happen.
		But at one point, you know, Israeli commander told his people, like, we have eradicated Hezbollah from this area.
		They're no longer here.
		And then they popped up like 50 feet away and shot shoulder mounted missiles at the compound and then disappeared without ever receiving return fire.
		Israel is not in a good position, which means if they want to actually go against Lebanon, they don't have the manpower, resources, or strategic footing to do that, which means they would likely deploy tactical nukes.
		And that's where this, of course, is inevitably heading.
		With that, I just want to... I think I moved one of these.
		Here you go.
		I want to combine these two articles here.
		We got one on paper and one on the screen.
		The first is this from The Guardian.
		Not from the Babylon Bee, as you may expect.
		Getting fit is great, but it could turn you into a right-wing jerk.
		Yeah, the healthier you are, the more right-wing you are.
		Which is true.
		Which is actually true.
		Why is that?
		Why don't they want you exercising?
		Maybe that has something to do with this.
		Exercise may be more effective than antidepressants in treating depression.
		See, these two stories work in tandem.
		It's a combination effect.
	Essentially, if you work out, you stop being a depressed, worthless idiot.
	So you stop being left-wing.
	You stop being hopeless and confused and powerless and weak.
	So you stop voting for the people who those types of people rely on.
	So getting fit is great.
	And it makes you right-wing because it stops you from being depressed and worthless.
	Like a liberal.
	Like how a liberal is.
	Out to your calls now for the final few minutes.
	Let's go to Angela in Wisconsin.
	Got some words of encouragement.
	For me or for everybody, Angela?
unidentified		Thank you for being there, Harrison.
		Love you all there at Impa Ward.
		Um, I just love that.
		I find very inspiring the A.I.
		Declaration of Independence that is read by you, Alex, and Owen.
		It's very inspiring and I haven't heard it played in a long time on your show.
		So that keeps popping in my head when I'm listening to your stories as encouraging for people.
		So if you take requests, that was one thing I wanted to.
		That and the stories on Obama's 2005 ... that he made ... well, he has his hands all over the bio labs that were developed in Ukraine.
		That and the 2014 jab of the military that Pete Santilli did a great report on that.
		I have all this kind of handy.
		So that I can present it to people, but my resources are very limited, so I'm really not getting much.
		I had social media at one time, and you know, I didn't have many followers, so it didn't get very far.
		But anyway, so I recommend those.
		Most people don't know about that, about Obamacare.
		And then, oh yeah, and then on top of that, Biden Blood Money, that book and article that Recently came out about that that you have on info wars.
		That's another one.
		Yeah, and there's one more thing I wanted to say if you don't mind if you have time all right quickly Okay, so there is Lucifer Michael and Gabriel in the beginning which God I And Lucifer's kicked out because he wanted to be God, and that's not available.
		So there's Michael, Gabriel, and all those angels that work with and for God on our behalf, as well as God's Spirit in us for those who do Romans 10 not.
		So I want people not to get discouraged.
		Counterfeit is the adversary and his people.
		It's always counterfeit power.
		Ours is genuine, and it really happens.
		When we pray, Christ is Living.
		He was resurrected.
		There's power in our prayer.
		And God is doing things.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Amen, Angela.
		No, I totally agree.
		And of course, you know, I always look at, you know, the Lord of the Rings has a really good quote about, you know, how evil can't, it can't create, it can't build, it can't establish life.
		It can only warp, pervert, and destroy it.
		You know, the symbol in Lord of the Rings is that the orcs You know, we're created, but only by destroying elves, right?
		You had to start with something beautiful and good, and then you can manipulate and destroy it in the same way that now they have clones of things, but they can't create life.
		Nobody on Earth can create life.
		We can create artificial intelligence, but even that is just derivative of our own intelligence, so...
		You're right.
		Evil can't create.
		It can only destroy, manipulate, and co-opt.
		And that's what we're seeing here across the board.
		Thank you so much to all of our callers.
		Thank you to everybody who's watching.
		We'll be back tomorrow.
		Stay tuned.
		The Alex Jones Show begins in 90 seconds.
		and InfoWarsStore.com, where you go to support us.
unidentified		While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
unidentified		InfoWars.com forward slash.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		If you don't get a high-quality gravity-fed filter from Infowarstore.com, please just get one.
		Now, we sell a unit, stainless steel, that is the highest rated out there.
		And there's a couple of competitors that are just as good.
		There's a hundred others that aren't as good.
		It is the best system out there to take thousands of chemicals and compounds down to non-detectable levels.
		The tap water, the well water, it is a witch's brew.
		And right now at InfoWarStore.com, we have a special on the Alexa Pure Gravity Fed Water Filtration System for 10% off.
		That's huge because there's not much markup in these because we sell them so close to cost.
		So get your Alexa Pure Water Filtration Systems and so much more at InfoWarStore.com.
		But whatever you do, research what's in the tap water and the well water and start protecting yourself.
		And all gravity-fed filters are not graded equal.

▲