Donald Trump’s Bronx rally drew 35,000 attendees—far exceeding predictions—while Democrats like AOC mocked supporters despite her own privilege. Meanwhile, the ICJ’s binding Gaza ceasefire order was ignored by Israel, which faces fuel shortages threatening newborns at Al-Aqsa Hospital. Nina Jankowicz’s 2020 book pushed AI-driven censorship as "warfare," mirroring Palantir’s claims of controlling speech via algorithms. The episode ties systemic fraud—like Social Security registration—to state overreach, warning of a future where dissent is criminalized and automated drafts force citizens to choose between civil war or foreign occupation. Satirical skits mock political elites, framing their power as a mix of tyranny and absurdity. [Automatically generated summary]
- -We had Nazis marching out in the open in Florida.
It looked like a scene from Charlottesville.
Many of you may remember in February 1979 there was a big uproar because someone by the name of James Gutman applied for a permit to lead a march of Nazis through downtown Philadelphia.
Now eventually some enterprising reporters did an investigation.
You know what they turned up?
James Guttman was none other than Mordecai Levy, who worked with the Anti-Defamation League, and later split off that to form the Terrorist Jewish Defense League.
This was an operation that was run by the ADL.
They wanted to have a Nazi march in Philadelphia.
Why?
Because how can they raise money to justify their existence if American Jews don't think there's a lot of anti-Semitism?
So what better thing to do than to slap swastikas on a couple of people, lead them on a march through town, and then the next day the ADL comes marching in and says, look, there are Nazis on the street.
And we have been debanked, and we've been deplatformed.
And part of this lawsuit, in fact, is we're looking into what PayPal has done.
Because PayPal was mentioned in a Newsweek article about our event, the second event that we did in Vegas.
And they said that the ADL was basically partnering with PayPal and other financial institutions to curb extremist behavior.
We're very pro-Trump.
We're pro-Christian.
We have...
uh multiple different types of people at our show so you know they they latch on to that because they don't want people getting together in really tough times and discussing really tough issues and they especially don't like it when people get together And bypass the mainstream media.
unidentified
I have software engineers and data scientists working at ADL.
We're monitoring all this stuff.
And we're working with all the platforms, by the way.
Google and YouTube and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and Steam and Amazon.
All these companies.
From, like, Apple to Zoom.
We work with all of them, okay?
That's relevant because we've been working with Twitter now since it was founded.
We'll be joined by Chase Geiser in studio in the third hour.
I'll be taking your calls throughout the second and probably third hour as well.
Maybe Chase and I will take calls together.
Talk about his appearance on Timcast.
And American Populism, title of his new book.
Got a lot of great videos to show you.
I think maybe we'll do...
We'll see.
We probably have enough stuff to talk about just from the daily, the day's news.
But it's been a crazy week, folks.
It's been a wild seven days, the last seven days.
We're less than a week removed from the president of Iran dying in a suspicious helicopter crash.
And yet it's like, there's been a thousand other things that have been major advancements.
And we just live in a crazy time when such a When these monumental news stories just happen every day, just every couple of days, there's some bombshell news story that drives everything else out of your mind.
It's been wild.
So maybe we should take a little breather, take a little look back at what's happened the last seven days.
But that's if we get to it, considering all the news that we have from the last 24 hours.
Here it is, your daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks.
Your Daily Dispatch for Friday, the 24th of May, 2024.
China says military drills encircling Taiwan designed to test its ability to, quote, seize power.
Okay, say what you want about the Chinese.
At least they're honest.
At least they're upfront about this.
China's military drills around Taiwan are designed to test its ability to seize power over the island, the People's Liberation Army said Friday as its forces kicked off a second day of large-scale exercises encircling its democratic neighbor.
The drills are the largest in more than a year and come just days after Taiwan swore in its new president, Lai Ch'en-teh.
who's openly loathed by Beijing for championing the island's sovereignty and distinct identity.
Beijing has denounced Lei as a dangerous separatist and decried his inauguration speech on Monday, during which he called on China to cease its intimidation of Taiwan, which has grown much more pronounced under Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
Look, like I said, you know, the official story, the official statement from the Chinese army about why they are doing drills on both sides of Taiwan is, quote, Wait, I just lost it.
Quote, test the ability to jointly seize power, launch joint attacks and occupy key areas.
Just, you know, you might not like it, but at least they're at least they're up front, at least they're being honest.
At least we don't have to suffer under pretending like they're doing something noble.
You know?
If this was America, it'd be, oh no, this is just a normal drill that's designed to make sure that the people of Taiwan are well defended and we're spreading democracy.
And it's just like, the Chinese are just like, no, we'll take over the island.
I mean, it's just, it's, you know, it's refreshing.
It's refreshing seeing some good old fashioned authoritarianism.
It's, it's refreshing seeing people just, just act, you know, aggressively and not pretend they're not doing it.
It's nice to, I don't like that they're surrounding Taiwan.
I don't like that they're forcibly incorporating an independent state into their Borg state.
But I am glad that they're not trying to tell us that it's because they love us.
They're not trying to tell us it's a climate change drill.
They're not, you know, lying to us about it.
They're just like, yeah, we're taking over the island with the guns.
That's what we're doing.
So we'll get back into that.
The third in the priority of flashpoints in World War III.
There are others, including, of course, Ukraine, as this story from Infowars says NATO, quote, preparing for war with Russia, according to Viktor Orban.
Hungary is reevaluating its role in NATO, as it has no intention to take part in actions that could involve member states in the Ukraine conflict and lead to a direct clash with Russia, Prime Minister Viktor Orban said on Friday.
Speaking on local radio, Orban said his country has already been relegated to the role of non-participant within the U.S.-led military bloc due to its stance on Ukraine.
And Budapest is now working on legal ways to retain its membership or reserve the right to abstain from joining NATO operations it disagrees with.
So this is interesting, because when you first read this headline, when I first scanned over it, I assumed this quote was coming from Russia.
I assumed this was Lavrov or somebody like that saying NATO is preparing for war with Russia.
No, this is a NATO member saying NATO is preparing for war with Russia as he is not in favor of that.
So pretty big deal.
That is a pretty big deal.
And it's interesting because part of me is like, yeah, if I was hungry, I would not want to be in NATO.
I would.
You could probably make a very good deal with Russia considering how close they are to Russia and.
You could probably get a really good deal with Russia in exchange for leaving NATO and joining their sphere of influence.
I don't know if that would be better or if it's better that we have countries in NATO that are willing to go against the demands of the American hegemony and actually possibly do something and have a positive effect on the NATO drive for war.
It is interesting though.
Meanwhile, now we're taking a little world tour of World War III flashpoints here.
Sorry, let's get these stories in the correct order.
This is, of course, Israel-Gaza.
Axios has this story.
Over 1 million pounds of aid reaches Gaza via U.S.
pier.
We did it.
We saved Gaza.
More than 1 million pounds of humanitarian assistance is transferred into Gaza through the U.S.' 's newly finished temporary pier, the Pentagon said Thursday.
The pier opened up a critical delivery route into Gaza, which has been beset by famine during the beset by famine.
Yeah, I locked my kid in his room for 24 hours with no food.
He was beset by hunger.
No, they're being starved.
Beset.
My God.
They've been beset by famine during the Israel-Hamas wars.
The entire population faces crisis levels of food insecurity or worse.
So, two-thirds of the total aid has been transferred and distributed by the United Nations further into Gaza.
The efforts being carried out as part of the United States broader effort alongside international partners to surge assistance to Palestinians in need, the Pentagon said in a blog post.
But then we have this story.
Gaza pier used to feed IDF before Palestinians.
According to a journalist with sources on the ground, the US-built pier that was constructed off the coast of Gaza, ostensibly to bring in aid for hungry Palestinians, was first used to bring in military equipment and then food, but the first batches of food went to Israeli Defense Force soldiers and not the starving citizens of Gaza.
Isn't that something?
Isn't that interesting?
We build a pier because the invading and occupying army of Israel is deliberately starving the civilians of Gaza.
We build a pier to deliver food, and we deliver it to the people carrying out the genocidal starvation program.
It's fun.
It's all very fun.
Finally, we have this.
Obama makes an appearance at White House's Kenya state dinner.
Why is this important enough to be in the Daily Dispatch?
You got me.
I don't know, but this was the main headline on all the news aggregation sites.
This is like the top thing.
The appearance of Obama took all those liberals back to a golden age, a time before the darkness, a time when they had total control of the narrative.
When Obama could do whatever he wanted, start wars wherever he wanted, and everyone would just kiss his boots, give him a Nobel Peace Prize.
A time before the disruptive force of Trump and his legion of frogs.
And his mere appearance at a state function is enough to make total headline news.
Somewhat ironic, because we are in the middle of a presidential campaign, and it's not a thing you want to do, reminding everybody how much worse Joe Biden is by having them stand next to each other.
But that's what they did.
Oh, also Obama was born in Kenya, so that also makes sense.
Also makes sense that he was at the state dinner for Kenya, since that is his place of birth, an original residency.
So there's that.
There is that also.
So that's it, that's your Daily Dispatch brought to you, of course, by InfoWarsStore.com.
InfoWarsStore.com.
We're back, baby.
We're back.
We were tantalizingly close to being destroyed.
And the irony upon ironies is that on the very day that we survive yet another round of legal decisions where our execution is stayed and we're granted A final reprieve, a last minute reprieve.
On that very day, Media Matters lays off 15% of its staff as it collapses, just like every other leftist media outlet.
Do you have any idea how proud that makes me?
Do you have any idea the miracle it is?
That InfoWars has never even laid off people because of what we've been going through?
These other companies, they get hit by a little inconvenience.
They just fire everybody.
They don't care.
They couldn't care less.
So thank God for Alex Jones putting in the necessary work to keep this operation afloat, keep all of us employed, and keep the information flowing.
Thank you, of course, for being there to support us at InfoWarsStore.com.
We could not, we would not be able to do it without you.
And it, I mean, it is literally, it is miraculous.
It's like actually miraculous.
InfoWars is like the modern media version of the Hanukkah story.
It's like, we should have only lasted a day.
Here we're eight days later and the flame is still burning bright.
It's a miracle.
It's miraculous.
How many other leftist media sites have shut down in between the time InfoWars got sued and today?
And we haven't laid, we haven't laid off a bunch of people.
We haven't stopped a single show.
We haven't downsized in the slightest.
We've gotten bigger and better throughout the entire thing, despite being under relentless existential threat.
active attacks constantly.
Meanwhile, you got Media Matters and Jezebel and whatever other news outlets, with quotes around them, news outlets that have been shut down in the last couple years.
They just get millions of dollars.
Their search results go to the top of Google.
They get priority on all the big tech.
I mean, they have every advantage and they fail.
We have no advantages under constant attack and yet we succeed and thrive.
That is the power of the InfoWar and the InfoWarriors.
So thank you for keeping us on air.
Thank you for getting us this far.
Just know the sky's the limit.
We got this reprieve and we can really do something with it.
With your help.
Now I'm going to show some videos of Donald Trump's rally yesterday.
It was very, very entertaining and fun to see him holding this massive rally in the middle of New York City.
But first, I want to go to a video from, believe it or not, The Daily Show.
Comedy Central's Daily Show made this skit talking about Kamala Harris.
See the moment in time in which we exist in our present and to be able to contextualize it, to understand where we exist in the history and in the moment as it relates not only to the past but the future.
unidentified
It really is such a career highlight to be working with someone with such an advanced mind space as the vice president.
I also sell essential oils on Facebook Marketplace.
Which, you know, I think it says something that It's been airing all along.
This daily show thing's been going, apparently.
They've been doing episodes, skits and things.
Haven't seen any of it.
Nothing about it has made waves or gotten any attention whatsoever until they did this, and this was very funny.
Maybe you should make fun of the giant clowns that run our country.
If you're a comedy show right now, if you're a daily political comedy show, and the Democrats aren't the primary target of your humor, you're really, you're missing out.
You're absolutely missed.
Like you got a giant feast in front of you.
Just roasted duck and chicken and beef and pork and just all the sides, just beautiful, delicious meal.
And you're over there, you know, looking for bread crust, old, old crusty bread pieces by Trump and the Republicans.
It's just, you know, there's a lot of, there's a lot of opportunity for humor with the Democrats and you're really missing out.
So maybe we'll see more of this.
I'd like to see one about Kareem Jean-Pierre's coach.
Something about how to act confident and condescending when you know nothing at all.
That could be a good one.
Obviously Joe Biden, which says you don't have to have a character, just play clips of Joe Biden.
It's humor in and of itself.
Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer.
I mean, is there a Republican that, I mean, is there a Democrat that is not sort of a living parody of themselves?
So it's good to see the Daily Show taking a big, big plateful, a big helping from the buffet of retardation that is the Biden administration.
Speaking of, we have a video from the man himself, Joseph Robinette Biden, President of the United States.
Ladies and gentlemen, there was a major, hallmark political event yesterday.
Donald Trump has been kept Locked in New York City because of his trial, his, you know, the baseless one.
You know the baseless, ridiculous, obvious show trial that represents a constitution-breaking abuse of power?
You know that trial where they're forcibly keeping him in New York City during what should be the height of campaigning season?
Well, he decided to flip it on its head, flip it back on him, and hold a gigantic rally in the middle of New York City.
He held it in the Bronx.
It was hugely successful.
They actually... They actually predicted that they would have something like 3,500 people show up at this rally.
I don't know if they actually believe that number or not.
But I'd like to think they know better than that.
I mean, these people are so... Like, they're so up their own butts, man.
They're so locked in their own...
Media landscape.
They actually came out and sincerely said that Trump would only be able to get 3,000 people at a rally in New York City.
The actual number turned out to be somewhere upwards of 35,000.
So they're just off by a factor of 10.
These people are sitting there thinking, well, CNN says everyone hates Trump, and MSNBC says everyone hates Trump, and all of my neighbors in my Upper West Side apartment commune all hate Trump.
So everyone hates Trump.
Nobody likes him.
He's gonna come to New York and no one's gonna show up.
It's gonna be so embarrassing.
It's basically what AOC said.
They just have no idea.
They have absolutely no idea.
And so when you think about how wrong they are about things, Just keep in mind, when they make predictions, they're off by a factor of 10, at the very least.
So it was a massive and monumental success.
Very, very embarrassing for the Democrats, especially people like AOC.
This is actually in her district.
And she was like, oh, looks like rain.
Sorry, Trumpy Pooh.
And then God happened, and then God erased the rain and brought out the sun just to embarrass AOC.
That's why he did it.
I have it on good authority.
So we're going to watch some videos of this, but I want to read this post from CynicalPublius on X, because he points out some very important aspects of this event.
He says, so Donald Trump held a huge, wildly successful rally in the Bronx today.
That in itself is in many ways remarkable, but what I find quite noteworthy is what did not happen.
What did not happen?
Let me explain.
The population of the Bronx is predominantly black and Hispanic.
Like most of America's urban centers, the Bronx suffers from disproportionate high amounts of crime, poverty, drug use, and gangs.
With that in mind, let me tell you what did not happen at this rally.
Trump did not put on an affected fake accent of an AME Zion minister or Chi Chi Rodriguez, see Hillary.
He was simply Trump, without any airs or patronizing words or thoughts.
He wasn't out there going, I just, I love hot sauce.
Uh, I ain't in no ways tired.
He wasn't doing the Kamala Harris thing.
He wasn't doing the Hillary Clinton thing.
Wasn't trying to be something he wasn't.
I didn't even bother getting clips from this Bronx rally because it sounds like every other one of his rallies.
It's going to happen so fast.
You're not even going to believe it.
We are going to turn New York around folks.
I mean, that was it.
That was, it was, she was just Trump.
He was Trump, Trump, Trump.
Oh, there you go.
Yeah.
So, uh, they said it's going to be a muddy mess for tonight's Trump rally.
And as he said, God is good.
And this smoke started pouring out of her ears, the smell of sulfur wafting around her.
Sick people.
Meanwhile, He doesn't pretend to be something he's not.
He doesn't put on an act.
He doesn't try to pretend like he's Joe Biden.
I mean, Joe Biden has gone further than anybody.
Trump's not up there going, I was raised by a Portuguese woman.
My father was trans, actually.
Actually, I grew up going to a Baptist African church in Alabama.
No, it's just like, I'm a rich dude, I'm the best dude, I love you all and I'm gonna help you, and people are like...
It seems legit.
Yeah, he seems actually sincere.
What else did he not do?
He did not tell the people of Bronx that they were victims.
He told them they were powerful and could solve their community's problems themselves.
He did not demonize any groups of Americans as the evil, quote, other.
Yes, he criticized the failed policies of Democrats and poked fun at their foibles, but he reminded everybody that we're all Americans first from coast to coast.
He did not promise to solve the problems of the Bronx with handouts or wealth redistribution.
He merely promised that he would help set the national economic conditions so the community itself could solve its own problems through jobs, business, and education.
He promised empowerment, not victimhood.
Contrast all of that with what a Democrat would say under the same circumstances.
Heck, contrast it with the vile speech of hate and victimhood that Biden gave in Morehouse College this past weekend.
The difference is stunning.
In fact, if the crew can pull that in, I would like to do that.
I would like to compare that.
If the crew can find a clip of Trump from last night and then a clip of Joe Biden.
If there's a clip of Trump talking specifically about black Americans, I would like to do a little compare and contrast.
I would like to see how Donald Trump talks about them compared to Joe Biden going, you go out there, you're being hunted.
You're being hunted like dogs.
They want to put you back in chains.
Sick idiots.
Finally, what scares Democrats about this rally is that it shows them that the people whose votes they have taken for granted for many decades are starting to leave the Democrat plantation of victimhood in favor of the uplifting, empowering message of Donald Trump and his aspirations to make America a place that is great again for all Americans.
The times, they're certainly a changing.
They're certainly a changing.
So let's go to some of these videos just from outside and around the rally.
First of all, clip 17.
Full-fledged street takeover of New York City with a giant Trump flag.
This, again, Trump was president for four years.
He never saw anything like this.
I mean, we joked endlessly about the idea that downtown Chicago could be MAGA country, but it looks like New York City is in fact MAGA country.
This is it.
New York City with a gigantic parade of Trump flags going down the middle of the street.
This is all we really need.
I mean, if ever conservatives are in a situation where they're not massively outnumbered, everything becomes very fun.
Everything becomes very fun and celebratory and triumphant.
The problem is just anytime we just don't organize, we just don't get together.
We don't do these things unless Trump does it for us.
We should be doing street takeovers.
We should be doing giant spontaneous rallies where we all come together.
So once there's, I mean, once you get that critical mass, once there's like a hundred of you, you can just do whatever you want.
You'll get a little, little scuffle of Antifa, sort of like, you know, like the, like the jackals on the edge of the herd trying to like snap at people.
But you know, the only, the only problems come when there's You know, a couple Trump supporters out there like, I just love America.
I'm just out here to support.
And there's just like a dozen Antifa who then feel like they have the power to hurt them.
We just need consolidation.
We need cooperation.
We need Trump supporters around the country to be organizing these things.
Once you have like a dozen people, you're pretty good.
You can get two dozen people.
You're a gang.
You're the most powerful organization in the city at that point.
Here's a video, clip number eight.
These are Bronx voters in AOC's district with a message for their absentee congresswoman.
Let's watch clip 8.
unidentified
The Bronx, actually.
I'm originally from the Bronx and from New York.
I'm from the Bronx.
Right here in the Bronx, New York.
This is home, right here.
AOC says if you're not a Democrat, you don't belong here in the Bronx.
What do you say?
I disagree with that.
I don't think she should be here in the Bronx.
I actually don't know any Democrats living in the Bronx.
Look, AOC, look at the tremendous support for Mr. Donald J. Trump.
I'm telling you, I wasn't going to spend a lot of time on this Trump rally, just as I was looking through all the videos that I have and grabbing some more.
You gotta spend time on that.
I mean, this really was, in many ways, a watershed moment.
It represents so many aspects of the zeitgeist and the compare and contrast that we're about to show you.
I think says more than I can explain with mere words, but the fact that this was only happened because of the machinations of the Democrats, keeping Trump tied down, bogged down with this trial.
I don't think he would have had a rally in New York City.
Why would he?
I mean, New York is so deeply blue, it's a waste of time and resources if you're on the campaign trail.
He's got Arizona, he's got Georgia, he can be focusing on these swing states.
He wouldn't have dedicated the time and resources to holding a rally in New York if he didn't have to, but they forced his hand.
And so, because of that, we now have some of the best footage out of the presidential campaign this entire year.
Probably the greatest optical victory that the Republicans have ever had.
Give it forced on Trump because the Democrats' ideology is poison and will always backfire on them.
This really is something incredible to see.
So again, I want to do a compare and contrast.
We're going to do a compare and contrast of what Joe Biden says about what it's like being black in America and what Trump has to say about it.
We'll do that in just a second.
But first, let's just compare and contrast the crowds and the people and the spirit and the energy and the soul behind these two movements.
So we'll go back now to Clip number eight, again, Republicans could have never done this without Trump.
It shows so clearly why he is a force to be reckoned with, why every Republican in the country should be behind Trump 110%.
I mean, he is our guy.
He is the leader of the party.
He is the leader of America.
You can't even imagine them having an event like this in a million years.
In a million years.
And they still hate the guy.
They do not get what his appeal is.
So, Republicans could have never done this without Trump.
Trump would have never done this without the Republicans forcing it on him.
And so because of all of these people working against him, what comes out at the end is how much better Trump is than all of them.
Let's go back to this video of Trump supporters at the Trump rally, what they have to say about AOC.
And this is the other thing, right?
We'll show you, we'll show you other videos as well.
The things that the politicians say about people in their own constituency.
AOC basically like wants their event to be rained out.
Thinks they're all idiots.
Sort of hates them, right?
Says, if you're not a Democrat, you don't belong in the Bronx.
It's just so insulting.
It's such a slap in the face to our own constituents.
Kathy Hochul will play the video of calling Trump supporters clowns, right?
Just from the left, there's just this hatred, this demand for conformity, this... They despise anybody who breaks the mold.
And it's clear.
And in return, you can come over to the Trump side, and we're just like, we don't care who you are.
We're glad you're here.
And that spirit is so unbelievably powerful.
Let's go again to clip eight here.
unidentified
AOC says if you're not a Democrat, you don't belong here in the Bronx.
What do you say?
I disagree with that.
I don't think she should be here in the Bronx.
I actually don't know any Democrats living in the Bronx.
Look AOC, look at the tremendous support for Mr. Donald J. Trump.
You need to tell her that she needs to stay out of the Bronx because look at all the people around.
Unimaginable before Donald Trump mixed things up politically.
Let's just do, you know, maybe even a better comparison would be we'll go to clip 15 and then we'll go to clip 22.
We'll have the audio up on clip 15 because the audio when you're filming Trump supporters is the song God Bless America playing in the background.
When we go to the Democrat supporters, we're going to have to bring it down because they're doing nothing but yelling curse words.
This again is just a visual representation of the divide In America, this is the real, it is a spiritual divide and it's whether you are open and loving and joyful and happy or vengeful and vindictive and envious and jealous and mean.
That's the divide here.
Democrat, Republican, that's what those words mean at this point.
So first we'll go to clip 15.
This is, let's just do a pan of the Trump crowd, shall we?
Yeah, just... I mean, we could play it again and somebody else could pull up the audio of, like, the sound of hell, basically.
Just, like, shrieking and curse words and anger.
And you can just feel it.
And you can feel it even without the audio.
But these are the different energies that are competing for supremacy in America at this moment.
I wonder which will win.
Let's go to clip 13 here.
Another, uh...
I'm giving the crew ideas.
Another Trump supporter.
This video is from Savannah Hernandez, who got a ton of great video on the ground yesterday and is making quite a big deal on X, appropriately so.
We're going to go to clip 13 here.
She's making an appropriately big deal.
About the fact that she was on the ground all day, in New York City, filming and uploading these clips, only to get home at night and realize that people had taken her clips down, re-uploaded them herself, like Dom Lucre.
Or Lucre.
Which is just rude!
It's just rude.
And the thing is, it's actually harder to do that, than just to share the actual video.
So you should be sharing these videos.
These videos do need to go viral.
They do need to be seen by more people.
You just copy the link and paste it in a tweet and it embeds it in your tweet.
To download it and then re-upload it yourself, you're doing like three or four extra steps just to not give the journalist credit, which is bad and wrong.
You shouldn't do that.
So support Savannah Hernandez and go share her Twitter videos.
Here's one of them, an interview she captured with a Trump supporter at the rally in Bronx yesterday.
unidentified
I'm here to watch the Trump gathering rally here.
What do you think about him being here?
I think it's great.
I think it's dope.
For my generation, from what I know, this is the first time a president has actually came to the hood.
I know presidents have came to the Bronx before, but we're talking about Woodlawn, Riverdale.
There's people that can do it actually better than me.
It's just a great place to be right now.
I think this energy, this is what New York needs.
Throughout the year.
Because New York has been through some tough times.
The economy is not good.
Crime is up.
The immigration problem is like, especially here in this region, in this area, it's incredible the mess that a small group of people can do to a state and to a country.
And we're here to support this president, you know?
The spiritual battle has never been more apparent.
The differences between the joyful, patriotic, uplifting right wing of the American populace and the cynical, dismissive, condescending, vengeful, vindictive, hateful side of things.
The permanent victims The sneering oppressors versus the good-willed, uplifting, fine folks on the right.
Telling you, you can debate policy till kingdom comes.
It's not as important as just seeing the reality of these two manifestations with your own eyes.
Let's take a look.
Let's do another little compare and contrast.
Should we start with Trump or should we start with Biden?
Let's start with Trump.
We'll start with Trump.
Last night at his rally in the Bronx, here's Donald Trump making a statement about black America.
Here's her statement on Donald Trump holding a rally in New York City.
I'm sorry, I think 24.
unidentified
Well, I'll tell you, it won't make a difference at all, Jake, and that is for Donald Trump to be the ringleader and invite all his clowns to a place like the Bronx.
New York will never, ever support Donald Trump for president.
We know him better than anyone, and that means we understand what he's all about.
Winning Battleground States00:05:01
unidentified
It's just for himself.
This state will go solidly behind Joe Biden for president, as it has in the past.
So, he wants to spend his time doing these made-up fake rallies and pretending there's support here.
Be my guest, because while you're doing that, Donald Trump, Joe Biden's out there on the other side, making sure he's delivering for all Americans.
And so, go ahead, spend all your time you want in New York, because we'll be with Joe Biden, and Joe Biden's out there winning over the rest of the battleground states.
We're going to we're going to get into the well, this is real news.
Now, this is real news.
I was going to say we're going to get into the real news.
There is some pretty bombshell revelations as almost every day.
It seems there's more and more.
We've got New Fauci COVID emails.
A new edition of the Twitter files.
This time focusing on the CIA's extra constitutional activities.
We got Israel, Ukraine.
Health being destroyed.
We got a lot of real news to get into.
But it's Friday.
And some big things are happening.
Some positive things are happening.
Like I said, this week has been just an astronomically important week in terms of geopolitics and domestic politics here in the United States.
I mean, the Iran president's helicopter being disintegrated in midair, that was kind of a big deal.
Not necessarily a good thing, another major leap towards World War III.
But elsewhere this week, Thomas Massie Winning his primary against a opponent who'd had $400,000 in ads purchased for them by AIPAC as an attempt to oust Thomas Massey for not being sufficiently dedicated to giving Israel money.
They tried to oust him, but he won.
Infowars, of course, got a great legal victory.
That means we'll be on air for the foreseeable future despite the desperation of our enemies.
There's been a lot of good news, and it's a beautiful thing to see.
We're gonna catch a lot more flies with honey than vinegar, and we can rail endlessly about the evil activities of the globalists.
But so much more powerful in my mind is what we stand for, not against.
And that's what That's why we want to celebrate things like what we saw yesterday.
And so this hour, we're going to open up the phone lines for your calls.
We're going to get into the Twitter censorship files.
The third hour will be joined by Chase Geiser, but we'll take your calls throughout his appearance here as well.
So stay tuned for that.
And by the way, just before I move on to some other videos.
You know, Kathy Hochul there.
Ice Queen of New York.
It's like Donald Trump can have his little rally in New York, right?
Or condescending dismissive tone.
Ignoring the fact that he has to be in New York because the Democrats have arranged it that way.
But this is what they do, right?
They'll do something to you and then blame you for reacting to it.
She says, Joe Biden will be out there winning the battleground states.
Is he though?
Is he though?
I went ahead and tried to scroll back through Joe Biden's schedule to find any campaign event in the past week or two.
And, uh, there's absolutely nothing.
There's pretty much nothing at all.
He's hanging out in Delaware.
He's hanging out at Joint Base Andrews.
He's going to a bunch of campaign events in Boston, Massachusetts.
Hanging out with the President of Kenya and Obama.
Yeah, he's not doing anything, actually.
Actually, he's not doing any campaigning at all.
Actually, seems like he's just going from Delaware to Fort Andrews to the White House and having fancy dinners with millionaires the whole time.
So, they can't even be honest about that.
Anyway, we'll move on now.
We'll move on.
I have a very funny skit to show you, but again, this is not just a skit for a skit's sake.
What it points out is a much deeper truth in the heart of our system, why it's broken, how it's broken, and perhaps what we need to prioritize in order to fix it.
And I know I've been getting a lot of pushback for insulting boomers recently.
I'm not even insulting boomers, I'm just categorizing them.
I'm just insulting them as a class.
And this is what I don't get.
If I say boomers mess things up, if I say boomers this, boomers that, I get boomers going, hey, I'm a boomer and I'm not like that.
Which is a very boomer response, to be honest with you.
And it's like, yeah, I know.
I get it.
Guess what?
I'm a millennial, and when people say millennials suck, you know what my response is?
You got people who lived through the Great Depression.
You got people who were just seeing the most miserable things in the world during the war.
They wanted to give their kids a nice, peaceful life, and they succeeded, and they did it.
The problem is those kids then didn't actually learn to value these things.
Or learn what was necessary to pass them on to the next generation.
So what's happening now is that instead of the older generation in power now, training up the next generation, training up their children to take the reins, to take power and have a, you know, transfer of authority.
They can go off and retire and enjoy the good work they've done while their kids pick up the reins and make their own way.
Instead, by clinging to power, not giving it to their children, not passing it on to the next generation, that next generation is sitting there going, okay, when is it going to be my turn?
I'm ready.
I'm here.
Can I have a turn now?
When you were my age, you were in charge.
Now I'm old enough to be in charge and you're still in charge.
You're still clinging on to it.
And so that next generation, Who should rightfully expect to be assisted in this growth, be assisted in this transfer of power.
They're left out in the cold.
And so the people who are taking power are not that next generation being raised and trained how to take the reins of control and You know, use it responsibly.
Instead, those reins of power are being seized by a revolutionary spirit.
It's the people who are not politely and respectfully waiting to be given their inheritance.
It's people who are going out and grabbing it.
It's people who have the revolutionary impulse.
They're the ones who are seizing power from the boomers who refuse to give it up.
So again, instead of this gentle transfer of authority from one generation to the next, you have one generation clinging to it jealously, and then the people outside of their families, outside of their generation, and it's the ones who will most aggressively seize power, are the ones who are getting it.
So this is why we have a bunch of You know, extremist, aggressive, hardcore, you know, socialist, seizing power.
Because the decent, normal people are sitting there politely waiting, twiddling their thumbs, going any minute, any day now, I'll be called up.
I'll be asked to fill my role as, you know, heir to this.
But no, not if, uh, Someone else comes and grabs your inheritance from you because it's not being given up.
So, I mean, this is actually an important thing.
In the economic system, the economic environment that we find ourselves in is so vastly different from our parents or our grandparents that it's hard to quantify.
Here's one way to quantify it.
Clip number six.
Is it cheaper to live as a middle-class American in Denver?
Or in an all-inclusive island resort.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Is it really cheaper to live at an all-inclusive resort than it is to live in a city in America?
Let's find out.
So the super average house in Boulder, Colorado is $800,000 with an estimated mortgage of $4641.
Here's our property tax estimate, about $339 a month, and you're probably going to need a car because you live in America, so let's drive a CX-5.
Now, if you're in a couple, you probably need two cars, but let's just say you have one.
Your SUV payment is going to be $509 a month.
You're going to need house and car insurance, so here's another $206 a month.
So we have our mortgage payment, property tax, car payment, insurance on your house and your car, your probably HOA fees, sewer and water, lawn care, trash services, electricity and power, gas, gotta eat, cell phone, Wi-Fi, gym membership, and if you want to go out, you have to spend money.
I'm probably forgetting something, but your grand total to live in Boulder, Colorado is... So you'll need $7,700 after tax income to live in Boulder, Colorado, plus health insurance premiums.
So, is it actually cheaper to live at an all-inclusive resort?
This spot in Punta Cana looks like this.
It is right on the beach.
All your drinks are included.
The property has multiple bars and restaurants, including a buffet, so all your food is also included.
Some other benefits are a spa on-site, housekeeping is included, yoga classes and a gym, and your Wi-Fi.
And the cost for two adults to stay at this resort is $6,100 a month.
It's over $1,000 more expensive to live in a moderate house in Denver than it is to live full-time in an all-inclusive island resort.
That's not right.
That's very wrong, actually.
There's something deeply disturbed with our entire system.
Now it's going to take a lot to get us back to Something that even resembles the American way of life where you can have one person making a decent wage while the mother stays home and takes care of the kids and we have community and prosperity.
And right now, the reaction from most conservatives to the economic pain that the average American is in is to dismiss the reaction from most conservatives to the economic pain that the average American is in is to dismiss it, downplay
Because, I don't know, they think it's, they're like, it's a weird sort of self-fulfilling thing where it's like the idea that...
People actually need help.
The young people need help.
The downtrodden people are actually doing the best they can, actually doing what they're supposed to do and not succeeding.
It's like such an anathema to suggest that the government or somebody should actually help those people.
And I mean, the government, it's not like I'm calling for welfare here.
I mean, I want, I just want the government to get out of the way.
I want the government to actually have policies that benefit the American people, like tariffs and trade deals that don't incentivize offshoring manufacturing or doesn't reward multinationals for shutting down American jobs.
I'm not talking about taking money from some people and giving it to some others.
I'm talking about policies that are actually designed explicitly to benefit the American people.
That doesn't really exist anymore.
And Republicans are so, like, hyper-sensitive to the concept that you're just asking for more money or you just want more of their stuff that they dismiss this pain.
They ignore the, you know, struggle and strife the average American is in right now.
And so ironically, the only people who are actually pitching to these people, who are actually, you know, respecting and pretending to give a crap about these people, are the socialists and the communists.
So because you're so afraid that having empathy for poor people will turn you into a socialist, you refuse to make a case, you refuse to do anything to try to help, And instead, they're all going to go to the socialists who are there going, hey, I get you're in pain and I got the solution over here.
So it's like by refusing to acknowledge this out of a fear of contributing to a socialist argument, they are in fact forcing all these young people into socialism and communism because it's the only side of the aisle that seems to care about their problems and issues they are in fact forcing all these young people into socialism and communism because it's I don't know.
Then Chase will join me, and we'll take your calls throughout the second hour.
So if you have any questions or comments about any of these stories for myself or Chase Geiser, give us a call 1-877-789-2539.
Taking your calls now on American Journal 1-877-789-2539.
So let's get into the Twitter files, shall we?
Michael Schellenberger has come out with the latest iteration of this Absolutely damning series of revelations.
This one's titled, Twitter Files CIA.
He says this, quote, The Central Intelligence Agency is the most famous of the 18 U.S.
government agencies that compromise the intelligence community of the United States of America.
Unlike the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the law strictly prohibits CIA employees or contractors from spying upon or running clandestine operations against American citizens on U.S.
soil.
But now, a new Twitter Files investigation reveals that a member of the Board of Trustees of the CIA's mission-driven venture capital firm and ostensibly Former IC and CIA analysts were involved in a 2021 to 2022 effort to take over Twitter's content management system.
The effort also included a longtime IC contractor and senior Department of Defense R&D official who spent years developing technologies to detect whistleblowers, quote, inside threats, insider threats like Edward Snowden and WikiLeaks leakers.
The proposed head of the DHS's aborted disinformation governance board, Nina Jankowicz, who aided the US military and NATO's hybrid war operations in Europe.
I remember she was the briefly crowned head of the disinformation agency.
before it got destroyed by disinformation.
Jim Baker, who as FBI general counsel helped start the Russiagate hoax, and as Twitter's deputy general counsel urged Twitter executives to censor the New York Post about Hunter Biden.
These existing or former IC employees, contractors, or intermediaries weren't satisfied with simply controlling Twitter.
They also wanted to use PayPal, Amazon Web Services, and GoDaddy in a totalizing effort to deplatform, demonetize, and excommunicate from the Internet entirely those individuals that the IC et al. deem to be a threat.
There is much that we still don't know about the effort.
We do not know if officials within the CIA or any IC organization ran the operation.
It is possible that the only individuals involved in the effort were the ones we discovered, and none of the individuals involved responded to our request for information, except for this one.
And so he goes on to document the way that these things were implemented, including the participation of Ol' Nina.
Ol' Nina Jenkiewicz.
Queen of disinformation.
Nina Jenkiewicz and the...
Before the IC's attempt to infiltrate Twitter and control its content moderation, several of the operatives involved made the case for treating, quote, disinformation as a security threat that requires intelligence and military tactics to combat.
On June 11, 2020, a little-known publisher, I.B.
Taurus, published Nika Jankowicz's How to Lose the Information War, Russia, Fake News, and the Future of Conflict, which argues for, quote, info war, kind of like the one the U.S.
waged in Ukraine and Eastern Europe.
In her book, Jenkiewicz compares the lack of regulation of speech on social media regulations to the lack of government regulation of automobiles in the 1960s.
She calls for a cross-platform and public-private partnership so whatever actions are taken by Google, Facebook, and Twitter simultaneously.
Jenkiewicz points to Europe as a model for regulating speech.
Talk about Germany's law that requires social media companies and other content hosts to remove obviously illegal speech within 24 hours or face up to a $50 million fine.
And she laments that the U.S.
has not been able to bring this about.
And you remember the, I believe it was, it was like the head of the European Union or something was on, was at a Davos World Economic Forum sort of meeting.
And it's going, America doesn't have European style speech controls yet, yet it's coming.
Everybody's like, It is.
Yeah, it is.
We're going to crush their speech.
We're going to dictate what they get to think.
They are bugs beneath us.
We are in charge.
We know what's right and wrong.
We are the arbiters of all that is true.
And opposing us is a crime.
It's how these people actually think.
So they very much are working on the European model.
They're taking how speech can be controlled and restricted through a government Private partnership, public-private cooperation.
They're taking that model that has succeeded in Europe.
As Alex Karp of Palantir has bragged, that they, through AI, you know, algorithmic manipulation, single-handedly stopped the far right in Europe.
Stopped the rise of the right wing in Europe.
So when you have these controls, when you have this power in the information war, you can change the political trajectory of an entire continent without anybody even knowing who you are or what you're doing.
It's incredibly powerful.
They don't quite have that here.
They don't quite have the control they want here.
And this is simply a new iteration, a new You know, set of facts and what we've been telling you about the entire time.
The public-private partnership, the neo-fascism, the internationalism, the control of speech, control of your mind, the making illegal, disagreeing with them.
It's all been happening behind the scenes.
unidentified
It's been obvious if you just observe the outcome.
with your host Harrison Smith back folks you know there's a reason that we can be principled in other words there's a reason why I personally don't feel the need to do a tit-for-tat they did us so we should do it to them kind of mentality I I'm partly.
I do want that a little bit, because you can just imagine.
If we used these tools that these people are forging, these people are creating disinformation boards.
They're creating the technical technical and.
You know, they're creating the hardware and the software for.
A control system.
And in a way.
I would like to use it in an appropriate fashion.
In other words, when Nina Jinkowicz talks about the danger of disinformation, how disinformation is a weapon of war and the government should go in and silence and work behind the scenes with Twitter to get rid of information that's disinformation.
I mean, would that not be an effective method by which to rid ourselves of things like Fat acceptance, right?
The disinformation, the misinformation, the dangerous lie that being incredibly obese is perfectly healthy and good.
I wonder, like I wonder what else, what other lies believed by the mainstream media could be targeted with this type of information.
Part of me does want to again use the weapons that our enemies have forged against our enemies.
At the end of the day, we don't need to because without censorship, we win.
Without regulations keeping us down, we win.
Without control of the platform, our ideas come out on top every single time.
Every single time.
It is so apparent on Twitter at this point that it's not controlled, that it's not censored or restricted, that the people On it or either popular or not sort of on their own merits.
And there's obviously still some soft censorship going on.
We've covered it extensively on the show.
I'm not saying it doesn't exist.
But you can go to pretty much any like mainstream celebrities Twitter page.
I was looking at Trevor Noah's yesterday.
Trevor Noah, right?
Former host of The Daily Show.
Means probably one of the most popular and famous political commentators.
He's got millions of followers, one way or another.
He has a hard time breaking a thousand likes on his tweets.
Nobody actually likes him.
Nobody actually pays attention to him.
Yeah, 11 million followers?
Usually a couple hundred likes on whatever he posts.
As many as I get.
I have 70,000 followers.
So nobody, without being artificially propped up, nobody likes these people.
Look at Don Lemon.
Don Lemon was the most popular anchor, the most respected and listened to.
I mean, he was just making headlines constantly as anchor of CNN.
He got fired.
He does like a podcast, YouTube X show now.
He gets like a thousand views.
No body listens to him.
He has nothing interesting to say.
There's no views that anybody wants to hear.
It's nothing.
It's nothing.
So we don't have to use censorship.
Like, yeah, they're forging censorship tools, and it's very tempting, like the ring of power, right?
It's like, well, Sauron forged this tool, but now we have it.
Let's use it against him.
But then we become them.
And what's the point of that, right?
We don't need censorship, actually.
We don't need affirmative action, right?
We don't need reparations.
The right side, the conservative side, the spiritually good side, doesn't need to employ these things.
We just need a level playing field.
That's it.
That's all.
We just need the chains removed, we just need the restrictions abolished, and then we win.
And it really is as simple as that.
And they know that, by the way.
That's why they need the censorship.
Desperately.
They require it.
Because their entire deception relies on the illusion That they have popular support.
That their ideas are well regarded by a large number of people.
They need censorship and bots and artificial algorithmic promotion.
They require that to uphold the illusion.
If they lose that, our ideas just blow them out of the water.
It's a cliche thing that if a Space on the internet is not censored, it becomes right-wing.
Every single time.
Every single time.
So Jenkiewicz is very obsessed with this info-war idea.
And she works with this company called Aletheia, I guess is what it's called.
The Alopecia organization.
No, no, yeah.
Alethia.
I think is what it's called.
would work with anti-diff information consulting firm to Twitter staffed by former IC analysis.
Its name is the Aletheia Group.
The Alopecia Group.
No, no, yeah.
Aletheia.
I think is what it's called.
And it goes on to talk about some of the people involved in this, all being CIA operatives who are obsessed with the concept of fake news, despite clearly falling for all of the fakest It's one of these very ironic things.
The people obsessed with fake news are still convinced that Russia got Trump elected.
And I just don't even know what to do about that, other than laugh at them.
But there's an interesting way this was put.
It's a sort of form of madness, what you're about to hear.
It's also extremely interesting.
Disinformation will become the next iteration of warfare.
The government should identify vulnerable populations.
On July 9th, 2020, Kaplan records a podcast on the next generation of warfare, saying a lot of ways that this is approached, at least from the defensive perspective, is a lot of the same lessons that we learned from counterterrorism and social media.
Where are the ISIS guys in chat rooms trying to recruit people to fly to Raqqa in Syria?
Where are the ISIS guys in chat rooms?
They're in your building, idiot.
They're in Langley.
They're in the office next to you.
That's another little issue with all this.
How do we stop people going to ISIS?
Meanwhile, the office directly next to them is the ISIS coordination office, where they are recruiting people for ISIS and then coordinating airstrikes to soften targets for ISIS to then raid.
I mean, the CIA is ISIS, so it should be clear just how nonsensical all of this is.
She says, I'm not going to sit here and tell you guys in the audience about the history of warfare, but when we think about the fact that governments have always had a monopoly on the mechanisms needed to conduct war, then you know obviously we've had an emergence of terrorism, and this feels like the next iteration of warfare in the sense that these tactics to cause chaos, these tactics to sow discord, they're more diffuse.
And I think that goes a long way in explaining how these people's mindsets are.
That it's like, no, the government is the one who has weapons.
The government is the one who controls speech.
The government is the one who dictates thought.
They consider these weapons of war, and they want them to be the sole property monopolized by the governmental system, which of course is a corporate governmental system.
So it's very interesting, this comparison to terrorism.
It's like, well, governments are the only ones who are supposed to have bombs and guns.
And if people not in a government have them, that's terrorism and it's dangerous and we have to destroy them and reclaim, reestablish our monopoly of these weapons.
And they think exactly the same thing about words, about speech, and about thoughts.
That the government is supposed to dictate these things.
The power structure is supposed to have sole authority in these things, and when you take that from them, you are a terrorist who's now wielding the government's weapons against them, and you have to be destroyed.
That tells you the mindset of these people.
And the Twitter files go on to talk about Number of people involved in this.
Number of organizations involved in this.
It's all about this Aletheia group, which is just a CIA offshoot.
That people within the organization are working to, you know, get positions of influence so that in fact the CIA can carry out disinformation campaigns and intelligence operations against the American people.
Which is why it's useful to have wars.
We need foreign opponents so we can claim that Americans are foreigners and spy on them.
Everyone in America needs a water filter and InfoWarsStore.com is where you can get the best on the market and a 10% off.
Again, we don't we don't put those on sale very often because they sell out at full price.
So go now to InfoWarsStore.com to get what you need and to keep us on the air in the fight and squaring off against the Scumbags trying to take over the world.
With that, we go out to your call.
Simon in Florida has breaking news from the International Criminal Court in a ruling about Israel.
This is number 73, believe it or not, and the information is actually from the International Court of Justice.
Where just in the last hour or so, they issued another ruling in response to a request from the public of South Africa regarding the Israeli operations in Gaza.
And in this case, they have made three main points, one of which is an immediate order for the IDF, otherwise known as the Aardvarks, to immediately cease their military operations
In light of inadequate responses to their orders to preserve all documents and records regarding the operations that are being conducted in Gaza,
That they have ordered the Israelis to allow genocide investigators to have immediate access to all areas of the Gaza Strip.
And then the third point, and this obviously was an issue after the United Nations Security Council meeting that passed Resolution 28, when you will recall, and your audience will recall, that the United States abstained.
Some people were surprised.
And then immediately, immediately, like while still sitting at the same chair, started to say that the resolution was non-binded and that was picked up by a few of the NATO allies like South Korea and Japan.
And in this case, the court, after seeing stories going around in Western media that whatever they did, it wouldn't be binding, explicitly stated that
As the top international court of the world, given that this is not an advisory opinion but is essentially a temporary injunction, that this ruling is absolutely and definitively binding.
Meanwhile, Hakeem Jeffries was meeting with Mrs. Thomas Greenfield, otherwise known as Mrs. James Brown, at the United Nations, where they were celebrating America's leadership in the world and at United Nations and the juxtaposition, otherwise known as a delusion, could not possibly have been stronger.
Yeah, well, they're patting themselves on the back as the city burns around them.
See, I hadn't heard about this.
I had the story that they were about to rule, but now the ruling is live and just looking at some of the headlines about this.
ICJ orders Israel to immediately halt Rafah offensive.
This one says Israel-Gaza war live.
Israel opposition leader calls ICJ ruling ordering halt to Rafah a moral disaster.
ICJ urges immediate and unconditional releases of Gaza hostages.
So they've come out in a couple of different ways.
Now, what would be the enforcement mechanism for these demands?
Because we've seen the way that Israel is very, you know, contemptuous of these international court rulings.
They basically say, what are you going to do about it?
What would be the enforcement mechanism for this?
Because this is the UN, it's the top United Nations court on Friday, ordered Israel to halt military operations in Rafah immediately, a landmark ruling likely to increase mounting international pressure on Israel more than seven months into the Gaza war.
So is there an enforcement mechanism at work here, Simon?
So this is rather complicated, but I'll be discussing this at length on weaponizednews.com that people will be able to tune into tonight at 7 Eastern after Interworld stops broadcasting.
But it's essentially Article 94.2 of the UN Charter that provides for the United Nations Security Council to take diplomatic or sanction enforcement measures, and if those fail to actually directly militarily intervene.
But the responses have already started flowing out from those other likable fellows, such as Mr. Smotrich, the Israeli Treasury Secretary, and Ben Gavir, their national security minister who's in charge of all the police.
They've said things like, we don't care what the rest of the world says, and quote, we're going to ignore the Gentiles.
It's indicating that they're not particularly receptive to these judicial orders, which to reiterate, are essentially stop the genocide and allow genocide investigators in.
The court noted Bearing in mind the recent Aardvark celebration for having evacuated, in quotation marks, 800,000 people from Grasper to an area called Al-Muwaisi, the court pointed out that those people have essentially been forcibly displaced by terror.
And the location that they've been sent to is a giant agricultural field with no facilities to support human life in any regard whatsoever.
So generally not cause for celebration unless of course you're engaged in ethnic cleansing with the alien game of death by starvation.
Incredible and it's not just starvation right there.
They're blocking all resources, not just food.
This from Middle East Eye.
The lives of over 20 newborns at Al-Aqsa Hospital are at risk as oxygen generators will be shut down imminently due to fuel shortages, UNICEF have warned.
So again, this is, you know, this is the lie that got us into the Iraq War, babies in incubators, and it's really happening sort of day after day in Israel, and yet it's the side that we're supporting and funding and facilitating.
Please, please, audience, bear in mind The accused international war criminal, Benjamin Netanyahu, currently the Prime Minister of Israel, otherwise known as Advocaatland, has, as of last night, been invited to speak before Congress at the Independence Day celebration that Speaker Johnson was the guest of honour at the Israeli Embassy last night.
A few people, many of them possibly Christian Zionists, might like to reflect upon that as they're celebrating Memorial Day, part of which involves American servicemen giving up their lives in order to free people from circumstances such as this, as opposed to spending $25 billion to perpetuate it.
I'm a little tired today and cranky because I was up late last night watching Thomas Tank's racing videos and Kat's GoPro first-person point of view video.
Another example is the array of technologies, often referred to collectively as geoengineering, that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change.
One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun's heat in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.
An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels.
This process is also relatively inexpensive.
The National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.
In 2007, it was announced that nano-sized particles, known as smart dust, can be dispersed over the battlefield via aerial spraying.
The military has contracted several multinational corporations to develop wearable biosensors.
Biosensors and smart dust can become something known as body dust that can spread inside the human body as an active network capable to provide telemetry from inside the body for the use of monitoring humans.
There is a patent for using polyethylene glycol derivatives as a way to modify the weather.
The same substances used in the COVID-19 lipid nanoparticles.
These polymers can be integrated with biosensors and soft robotics for smart materials.
Materials that can be modified by external stimuli.
Soft robotics is a subfield of robotics that utilizes compliant materials rather than rigid ones, such as the hydrogels found in the experimental COVID shots.
DuPont is manufacturing elastomers for fast-moving soft robots and have developed the fastest DEA-driven soft robots ever reported.
Designed for biosensing, interacting with biological entities, and actuating on a cellular level.
In her recent article, Smart Dust, Biosensors, Polymers for Geoengineering and the Multinational Corporations that Manufacture Them, Dr. Ana Maria Milchia points out that these are the transhumanist technologies that will be giving AI enormous amounts of data, as Bill Gates said, to understand 100 trillion organisms.
She also points out the important fact that the elastomers being fabricated by DuPont for this soft robot technology are made of the exact same chemicals found when analyzing the mesogens, a compound that displays liquid crystal properties, found in targeted individuals.
And they appear to be the same compounds she found in the blood of the vaxed, as well as the blood of the unvaxed, which appear to be the same structures used as part of electronic circuitry in self-assembly nanotechnology.
SmartDust is a system of tiny microelectromechanical systems that can detect light, temperature, vibration, magnetism, or chemicals.
They are operated wirelessly on a computer network, can be used for medical or military surveillance purposes, and can be dispersed through the air via chemtrails, which would greatly go unnoticed by the sleeping masses who have come to accept them.
When combined with the Mesogen soft robot technology, which has already been found in several blood samples of unwitting victims, they could create a means of monitoring and controlling the entire human population.
Yeah, well, you know, I've been bragging online because now I have the record for the most F-bombs on TimCast, and I also have the world record for the most Let's Go Brandons.
But it gets associated and people think if you're a nationalist you want to kill people that... Right, well I mean now in Germany you can't even say everything for Germany.
If you know the real name, you have power over something.
That's even more true when it comes to, you know, ideologies and there's a certain power in words and finding the right word is often, like, the thing you need to get an idea to work.
I think populism is just a very beautiful thing.
You swayed me during your interview that, like, I should call myself an American populist.
Not that I didn't think that you were populist before, but it is When we arrive at a place where we realize that both the Republicans and the Democrats are equally opposed to the people, that's what populism is.
It's just the acknowledgement that it's not about Democrats versus Republicans, it's about the people versus the political class.
And then it becomes very easy once you see it from that perspective to identify as a populist.
And I love that you put, and we pointed out on the show yesterday, when You know, he's asking you about Taiwan and you were saying, I thought your response about China just and just going, look, China might be a threat, but I don't like saying that because I feel like I'm contributing to this argument that's being made by my enemies.
I thought that was a good point.
But then it's like, look, if populism was a priority for the people in charge, we would never be in this situation in the first place because we never would have outsourced all of our manufacturing to China.
That's obviously bad for the American people.
So again, I just I think it's a great sort of It's not like a catch-all phrase.
It's not like a trick or anything.
It just is, uh, is, it's hard to argue against.
It's hard to sit there and go, I'm against the popular thing.
I mean, the word is it's the word popular is in populism.
So it's like, it's hard to, uh, it's hard to debate against, which I think is a very powerful thing.
Look at this.
This story is from two days ago.
We haven't hit peak populism yet.
So they are trying, they're trying to demonize it.
So, nationalism simply has the connotations, whether it should have those connotations or not, of the nationalism that we saw in World War II among the Mussolini's and the Third Reich.
And so, basically they're the same thing.
The difference is, I think, that nationalism implies an ethnicity, whereas populism implies a culture.
So with German nationalism or Italian nationalism, it was very much like Italy is for Italian ethno, ethno-Italian people or Germany is for ethno-German people, whereas America has no ethnicity.
It has a culture and an identity.
So when I talk, when I call myself a populist, You can be an Asian and a populist.
You can be black and a populist, Latino and a populist in America because America is about assimilation.
It's not about what ethnicity you're born into.
It's about what culture you choose.
It's the difference between an immutable characteristic and something that you choose about yourself.
It's the identity that you choose for yourself.
Born into anything or born into any identity like the left would have you believe with all of its identity politics.
We uniquely choose who we want to be and decide to assimilate.
Our forefathers, my ancestors immigrated here in 1893.
They came here not to be Swiss in America or to be German in America they came here to be American you hear stories time and time again of parents that refuse to let their children Speak their native tongue.
You will learn English here in America because we came to America to be Americans I mean, that's like an old immigration story a motif in New York among Irish or Scottish or whatever I mean, they already spoke English, but they all the different ethnicities of immigrants came here It was a trend to make your kids learn the English language and become American.
So when I talk about populism as a Differentiates from nationalism.
It's about fighting for the American people and the American culture with no connotations of ethnicity or racism in the way that they would be associated maybe perhaps from a Mussolini figure or a Nazi figure.
Yeah and you know obviously I'm a nationalist and I would guess you're a nationalist too but I do think it's it's very valuable to have this this term populism Again, it's just hard to debate against.
My wife was frustrated with me when I was writing it because I was staying up all night writing this book and not focusing on clients before I had a job here.
I thought I was going to have to self-publish to my Twitter audience and sell maybe a thousand copies and make a little bit of money, but no, it ended up being the perfect timing.
The UN Um, voted for a new holiday, uh, Serbian genocide day where they're going to commemorate the, um, uh, fatalities in the Srebrenica massacre that happened.
And, um, I was wondering with that, if there's going to be a genocide day also for what's going on in Gaza, obviously.
And, um, then I was wondering if you guys saw the new Scorpion M drone tank.
That was in Ukraine.
And then I was wondering about your guys' thoughts on why we haven't seen a lot of myocarditis and vaccine side effects coming out of Israel.
So it's very possible that people are dying in droves in Israel of myocarditis and it's being Written up as something else heart disease or things that are you know common anyway and so They're probably obscuring or obfuscating the the data to make it less obvious whether or not it's associated with the vaccine Yeah, I'm seeing I'm seeing some Irish I mean I just searched Israel heart attacks right because they're not gonna say vaccine injuries, but you know you see headlines There's another one from Daily Mail earlier this week that was like oh
unexplained rise in cancer across the globe.
And I haven't seen any individual countries as being like, except for Israel, they're not experiencing. - The stress of the war with Hamas is increasing heart attacks in Israel.
It's like, are you sure it's not the vaccines and the six boosters? - Yeah, it's the stress of Hamas plus climate change.
I mean, there's a number of contributing factors here, but it says a recent research by Retsef Levy, documenting a 20 to 35% increase in cardiac arrest among the Israelis aged 16 to 16.
They come into your space, this is our space now, and you don't belong here.
So she moved into the Bronx so that she could win a Congress seat, and now she's telling people who grew up in the Bronx that they don't belong there because they support Trump.
And lastly, too, I say with Biden and they say, you know, white supremacy and they floated that ad of Trump out of content saying he doesn't like those people.
But it's actually Biden who blatantly said he didn't want his kids to go to a racial jungle school.
And he lied when he debated Kamala Harris.
And he said, well, it was more like a libertarian.
You point where he didn't want the state to impose, but no, he said right out, I don't want my kids going to a racial jungle school.
And he was making faces like Jack Nicholson in the shining when he had the baseball bat.
He's like, don't worry, Alice, I'm not going to hurt you.
I'm just going to bash your brain out.
And he was sticking his lower teeth and rolling his eyes.
And back then he had brown hair.
and he had a receding hairline so he looked just like that. - He had that horrible comb over, yeah.
I mean, this is the benefit of having a president that's been in office for 100 years is you can go back to the 60s and see him on TV being excoriated for plagiarizing his speech or whatever.
he was getting in trouble for back then he's said a long a long history of uh lying and saying horrible things that uh that are Jim Crow Joe Jim Crow Joe so we spent the whole like first hour of the show showing clips from the uh rally the Trump rally in New York I don't know if you've been able to see any of the clips Chase but it's not over 100,000 people right I think the official count was like 35,000 but you never know Okay.
Yeah, it could, it could have been a hundred thousand.
I mean, it was, it was absolutely massive.
It was huge.
And just the not less so, less so the size, but the spirit of the crowd and just the videos that you see, I mean, it comes across so apparently just the, The joyful attitude, the uplifting attitude.
And then you compare that with Democrat events that are just, they just like sort of, um, they like, uh, expel this, this energy, this down.
Yeah, I noticed it most markedly with Harry J. Sisson, who, by the way, now for the third time, I challenge Harry J. Sisson to a lawful duel under Texas Penal Code 2206.
You haven't responded to any of my tweets where I have challenged you to fight me here in Austin, Texas.
We can live stream it.
We can have Nitric Boost sponsor it.
And I would love to just slap you silly to the extent of the law that it's lawful.
Anyway, he posted before It's going to be a muddy mess in the park.
What a disaster!
As if the weather is Donald Trump's fault.
Then when it blows up, he's like, oh, people are leaving before he's even speaking.
It's a totally mischaracterized clip that he's showing.
I mean, the dude is totally full of crap.
They lie.
And this is why I wrote a book called The Rise of American Populism.
People are realizing that no matter whether it's Republicans in power or Democrats in power, nothing that the people need is ever represented.
And they're finally waking up to it.
And you ask, you know, how does the Democrat, how did the Democrats have so much power?
Well, they've done it through lawfare and corruption, but that's not going to last much longer.
I think either in 2024 or in 2028, we are going to see a one party state that is not left.
I really do.
And that's got its own problems.
We could cross that bridge when we get to it.
But I think that we are going to take all of the power back from these people, man.
And what's happening is the Democrats think that when the boomer generation dies off, that means the Democrats are always going to win, because disproportionately, boomers are right-leaning.
The older you are, the more conservative you are.
It's traditionally been true.
But what's going to happen is when the boomers die off, The Republican Party is going to completely shift from neocon to populist.
It's going to go all MAGA.
So even if it's a minority, even if it's only 33%, we're talking about a much more radicalized 33% of the population than this current whitewashed 50-50 Democrat Republican Uniparty BS.
So I'd rather have a radical third of the population than a milquetoast 51% of the population.
So I do think that even if we have a minority, we're going to find a way to take this country back because we're going to be so aggressive.
We're trusting the plan and it is apparently working.
I'm amazed at the crowd that Trump is getting.
And I was just seeing people on, I can't remember if it was Cernovich or somebody on Twitter going, either Trump wins in a landslide or elections aren't real because we're already seeing the signals.
And there's just no, there's a gap that is insurmountable at this point, in my opinion, without Overwhelming fraud to the extent that is frankly impossible.
Let's go back out to the crowd here.
We got actually on topic, Hobbs in Nebraska talking about electoral 4-D chess.
Yeah, so first off, before I get into that, I want to go back to what you were talking about with the Joe Biden AI.
If they modeled it with glossy plastic skin and hair and a retro 80s analog aesthetic with a glitchy voice, you know, basically Joe Biden has max headroom.
They'd probably have a marked improvement over what they've got now.
I mean, he's already got plastic skin and a glitchy voice, so we were already halfway there.
Yeah, so as far as the Electoral College and the 4D chess, these are two separate things.
The first off is the electoral college.
This is actually something I called in a while ago and talked to Chase about it, and I'm glad both of you guys are here.
We can bounce it off of each other.
So there's a movement now in Nebraska, where I live, to change up how we apportion out our Electoral College votes, because currently Nebraska and Maine do things different from the other 48 states in the country.
We actually split our electoral votes up by congressional district.
We have three congressional districts here in Nebraska.
Omaha usually goes blue.
The CD1, which is like the crescent around Omaha that encompasses Lincoln, usually goes red, but it's usually pretty close.
And then CD3, where I live, is like an R-plus-50 district.
It's Republican all the way.
And they want to change that to a winner-takes-all, like 48 of the other 50 states currently do.
And I think that's a huge mistake.
Uh, you know, if the one blue electoral vote in Omaha ends up swinging this election, then I will gladly eat that crow and ask for seconds.
But I don't think it will, and I don't think it ever will.
And I think that what they're doing for a winner-take-all election in this state It's a huge mistake because all it's going to take is a population boom in Omaha or for CD1 around Lincoln to shift demographically just a little bit and suddenly we go from a one blue electoral vote in Nebraska to all five of them.
Now, if other states would advocate for a Nebraska-style approach to their electoral college, then we would see probably never a Democrat president ever again.
Because if you can imagine a state like California or Illinois, rather than be winner-take-all, you have several counties and congressional districts that usually go red, but then they have to...
We're running up on the end of the segment here and I want to get Chase's take on this.
I think that we spend a lot of time, both on the right and the left, talking about redistricting and gerrymandering and the Electoral College versus the popular vote and whether or not we should change this policy here in this state and this policy in that state.
When what we should really be focused on is getting 60%, 70% of the popular vote.
All of these little nitpicky issues for how we tally things up would go away if we just murdered the left in every election.
So instead of getting a whole state to vote and democratically choose by popular vote for the whole state who your senator was, you actually had to vote for your local representative who would go to your state legislature and they would pick the senator.
So it's a lot Strangely enough, it's a lot easier to rig an entire state's one giant state election than it would be to try to rig every little county election.
I think we need to get back to that.
unidentified
You're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Thanks for calling in Michael about World War Three.
You know, since we're on it, here's the headline from the Hill.
This might give you a some insight into just how badly we're doing.
Biden is losing World War Three.
That's right, folks.
President Joe Biden is losing a war that hasn't started, but that he is trying to start.
That's what's happening right now is we're not technically in World War Three.
Hey, thank you.
I just want to first say that I think everybody should support InfoWars.
All roads lead to Rome.
All roads lead to InfoWars.
Colin and Michael, you're on the air with myself and Chase Geyser.
unidentified
Hey, thank you.
I just want to first say that I think everybody should support InfoWars.
All roads lead to Rome.
All roads lead to InfoWars.
A lot of people do not realize how much InfoWars support other people, like businesses, whether it's silver, somebody else that spreads information, politicians.
InfoWars is an infrastructure that cannot fail.
They sell stuff you need, such as water filtration.
And I'm not sure if y'all see the stuff that filters out of water, but it can look, sorry to be gross, but literally like poop, like blood.
And if you're not doing that, then you're drinking water and water bottles.
It's expensive and, to me, tastes like industrial chemicals.
So why would you not filter your water?
But I just want to say, we need to stop being passive with this World War situation.
But at the same time, there's a whole lot of reason for hope.
We will not lose, because if they do not strike now, they give us time to prepare.
And if they push it too far now, we will rise up.
So if we're not passive, we will win.
But I also think we should realize we have been passive.
I was reading my family tree, and this can't be the only reason Uh, that some of them fought in the American Revolution, but they put down that it was because of mandatory meetings upset them, uh, actually enough to put it in the family tree information of why they went to war.
And now, as men, so-called men, we're literally letting them, like, rape our women and children without fighting back.
What's wrong with us?
It's not biblical.
We cannot call ourselves Christians if that's what we're doing.
But the thing is, Joe Biden threatened us that they have fighter jets, but the U.S.
military, when it's strong, can't even win a war against Afghanistan people fighting unconventionally.
We will win.
But I just want to go to the ultimate point, which is also a question, that if they push us into World War III, I'm not going to fight the Russians, kill Russians, when we're the ones that caused it.
Civil War Risks00:15:17
unidentified
I don't think they're thinking through a draft situation.
We know who's causing it.
The last thing I want to say is I would have felt like a coward if I didn't fight Nazi Germany.
And, you know, like we said a million times here, it's weird that as a fan of history, you watch the buildup to things like World War I and II, and you think, man, what would people have done to stop this from happening?
If they only knew, if they only knew where this went eventually, wouldn't they have made concessions?
Wouldn't they have done anything to prevent the millions of dead that just Disgenic effects where the best of your generations of the best men of Europe just slaughtered on a battlefield for nothing.
Wouldn't they have done something?
And why didn't they?
And then here we are watching the buildup to World War III, personally, just feeling completely impotent, incapable of stopping the onrush, the oncoming reality of World War III.
What can we do, Chase, to prevent this in our personal lives or as a nation?
Honestly, I don't know if there's anything that can be done to prevent the actions of the political class.
The only thing that we can really do is exercise civil disobedience.
And when the time comes, like many who refused to participate in the Vietnam War, it's better to be in jail than in an unjust war.
And I would give my life any day of the week for America, but I am never giving my life for the United States.
So you can lock me up.
That's fine.
You can persecute me.
You can hang me if you want.
But I'm not fighting in World War III for the United States.
I'd fight for America.
I'd much rather fight in a civil war against the United States government on behalf of America and American values and Americanism than fight in a world war on behalf of this political class, this military-industrial complex.
Especially since I've been griping and calling it and everybody on this network has been griping about and calling it for years that that's exactly what this political class is doing through the fractional reserve banking and the global reserve currency that have set us up for these conflicts and justified every conflict that we've been in basically starting with Vietnam and onward.
It's their fault, so they can go and fight in this conflict.
I'm not fighting.
And frankly, I'd rather see Europe occupied by Russian Orthodox Christians than occupied by radical extremist Muslims like it is now.
What problem does Europe have that wouldn't be solved by being occupied by Russians?
Maybe World War Two, I guess you could argue there was a legitimate threat to our freedom.
But other than that, like Civil War, Revolutionary War, World War One and Two, every other war has just been a BS political war that has had nothing to do with protecting our freedom.
I was like, you think... And the reason I brought it up was because he was implying, and maybe this isn't one he intended, but the implication of his argument is that if you're in civil strife, it's inevitable that the next stage be civil war.
So my question was, well, have we ever been in civil strife before and not gone to civil war?
So it was the only other instance of civil strife, you know, pre 1860, right?
Or 1862 or whatever.
And the answer is there's been at least half a dozen instances in this country where academics have said that we've been in civil strife, but there's only been one civil war.
So just because we're in civil strife now doesn't necessarily mean that we're going to civil war now.
I think that it's likely that we will go to civil war at some point over the next hundred years.
I don't know if it's going to be next year or in a hundred years, but just because we're in civil strife doesn't mean that civil war is inevitable.
And the strife that we're in is different and more extreme in some ways and more bizarre and sort of unprecedented in some ways, but it just for sheer volume and intensity, nothing compared to the 1960s.
The 60s were insane.
I mean, literal bombings in every city, the weather underground, the Black Panthers, the, I mean, we're doing all right, folks.
Yeah, we're against this because we are about women empowerment.
They should also.
...be drafted to die in a war for the globalist overseas.
No, obviously not, but...
They put this out just sort of like out of nowhere.
You know, the official account on Twitter was just like, oh, by the way, we're really sort of ramping up, rebuffing, reorganizing the Selective Service thing.
No reason.
No, no reason at all.
Just letting you know that we're updating the Selective Service program where we might have to draft you into the war that we're starting overseas for no particular aim or goal.
Somebody did send me a correction.
I said, I just did a quick search.
I searched Israel heart attacks and it showed that Israel is undergoing the same Problem everywhere in the world is with unexplained rise in heart attacks and cancer But I did forget about this and somebody on Twitter reminded me study concludes women's fertility harmed in fact in vaccinating countries Hmm.
They say there's a correlation between between the amount of vaccines you had and whether your fertility plummeted.
After the correction, Seychelles and Mongolia returned to the norm, and only Israel continues to enjoy relatively high fertility, despite the high percentage of vaccinated women.
You know, it's abortion by, you're being vaccinated against being a mother, I guess. - Oof.
Israel is Pfizer's laboratory state, and it must have been given a high percentage of a placebo recipients to test the vaccine results against them as a control group.
So that's the guess there from Dr. Seligman.
So there is some anomalies when it comes to Israel's vaccine side effects.
So thank you to whoever sent me that on X. Out to your calls again.
Philip in New Yorkistan wants to talk about people freeing themselves from the system.
Chase, you also had a big part of the conversation about secession, which you were very bored with and moved on.
But, you know, one thing when you talk about secession, whether it's Texas secession or whether it's the counties in Oregon wanting to move over to Idaho or whether it's, you know, neighborhoods in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, wanting to no longer be a part of the city and be their own city.
There are a lot of success succession movements going on in America right now.
And secession as a concept can be applied to states, countries.
But I think the reason that these littlest secession movements are important is because they represent a testing of whether we still have a system or not.
Whether we can still Reclaim power is a way to to establish your own representation, right?
So it's all it's almost less important as to whether these Countries are these counties do end up going to Idaho or Oregon?
It's the fact it's the the question the the stress testing of the system saying can we can we do this?
Can we still make changes or are we unwilling to?
you know, prisoners in this system.
So as of now, these secession movements taking place in cities across the country are being successful, which is good.
And it means that we can still make political change.
We don't have to resort to violence yet.
But once that stops working, once people, you know, in the cities are going, you're not allowed to leave because we need your resources, then we're gonna have trouble.
Go ahead, Philip, you're on the air about people freeing themselves from the system.
Go ahead.
unidentified
Correct on all levels.
You guys are hitting the head, the nail on the head in so many different aspects.
And I thank you, Chase, for bringing up this whole popular, popular, popular is, um, populism.
Thank you.
Populism because populism is a wonderful thing.
Now, uh, the way I'm linking all this together, because I am an American state national, and the first thing people think of when you hear national or militia, you think of crazy white guy up in the woods shooting guns, preparing to go blow something.
It does sound like a relief of our daily, doesn't it?
It absolutely does sound like a relief.
It sounds like a getaway.
We should, like, do this for men.
I guess they do.
A national is just somebody that is naturally born here on this land and soil.
They played this huge fraud on us back in the Civil War.
Like you said, it was a fraudulent war.
It wasn't about our freedom.
It's not about Saving the slaves?
No.
They decided to enslave us all and have us all willfully give up our freedoms.
Now we have these birth certificates and social security cards and all this other fraud going on.
And yes, we can absolutely divorce that system.
There's two different systems, this left and right paradigm, where they are completely running amok and destroying our lives in every aspect.
but you can divorce from this system by becoming American state national and changing your political status.
Now, the reason why I called was because I already asked Anna Von Rice.
She's a Supreme Court justice up in Alaska, and she's been exposing this stuff for, I want to say, at least 35 years or so.
And she's been getting people the information to be able to correct their political status and divorce their living soul from the straw man that was created with the birth certificates and the Social Security card. - So this is sort of a...
Just remind me the name of the woman again, because I would love to get her on.
I do want to get to at least one more call here.
What's the name of the woman?
unidentified
That was the call.
Her name is Anna Von Rice.
And of course, just like Alex, she's been demonized in every possible way.
About if you try searching her, but I want to connect you guys because she's willing to come on your show.
She's willing to go on info wars and eventually one day maybe war room and the networking aspect because I send a lot of the nationals to your site to buy what we need for, you know, thank you so much for your support and the call Phil.
It's always an honor and a pleasure to be with you on the American Journal.
Of course.
And I would just encourage everybody to visit InfoWarsStore.com and definitely stay tuned because just in like four minutes, three minutes, the Alex Jones Show begins with the great Alex Jones.