Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| It's urgency. | ||
| Urgency. You need urgency. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The United States can pay any debt it has because we can always print money to do that. | |
| So there is zero probability of default. | ||
| We need an urgency, people, and not have this learned helplessness. | ||
| Now, why did I play that clip? Well, for them, buying up real infrastructure, I guess they get first use. | ||
| But for everybody else, it causes inflation. | ||
| And just two years ago, Biden said there isn't inflation. | ||
| He said, well, then it's not that bad. | ||
| Oh, it's terrible. It's Trump's fault. | ||
| Now it's fixed, but it's not. | ||
| Am I taking blame for inflation? | ||
| No. Because it was already there when I got here, man. | ||
| Remember what the economy was like when I got here? | ||
| We've squandered our time in the sun. | ||
| We have too much debt. | ||
| And the rest of the world says, hey, you've got too much debt. | ||
| You're flooding the world with your dollars. | ||
| We want a different reserve currency. | ||
| Well, who's going to now come into that role? | ||
| The BRICS nations. So Greenspan, when he made that comment, I believe that he's absolutely wrong. | ||
| Because at some point, while you have the world's reserve currency, sure, you can fund every stimulus under the sign, you can raise the debt ceiling, you can spend, spend, spend like drunken sailors. | ||
| But once, because you still have built-in demand for your currency, because you're the world's reserve currency. | ||
| But if you don't have that, you have to have discretion in your printing. | ||
| You have to have discretion in your spending. | ||
| That's... The trait that we don't have with politicians in America. | ||
| And then they're gonna have to go back to quantitative easing soon. | ||
| Kirk Elliott Monskoe predicted regional banks start failing. | ||
| It's now begun. We need to really talk about this and have a very serious mind. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The US government can't go bankrupt because we can print our own money. | |
| Why exactly are we borrowing in a currency that we print ourselves? | ||
| Well, um, the, uh, so the, I mean, again, some of this stuff gets, some of the language that the MM, some of the language and concepts are just confusing. | ||
| I mean, the government definitely prints money. | ||
| And it definitely lends that money, which is why the government definitely prints money, and then it lends that money by selling bonds. | ||
| Is that what they do? They, yeah, they sell bonds. | ||
| Yeah, they sell bonds, right? | ||
| Since they sell bonds and people buy the bonds and lend them the money. | ||
| Yeah, so... | ||
| Uh, so, um, yeah, I guess I'm just... | ||
| I can't really talk... | ||
| I don't get it. | ||
| I don't know what they're talking about, like, because it's like the government clearly prints money, it does it all the time, and it clearly borrows, otherwise we wouldn't be having this debt and deficit conversation, so I don't think there's anything confusing there. | ||
| Just because I don't know what it is doesn't mean I'm lying. | ||
| The president? The most legislatively successful president in my lifetime. | ||
| And, you know, I don't have to go through the list of bipartisan infrastructure, law, the PACT Act, the Chips Act, all that inflation, 15 million jobs. | ||
| It's all good. I mean, I was really thrilled to meet the entire staff because you know it's not just one person. | ||
| You have failed me for the last time. | ||
| This inflation In home prices and building materials that I've just talked about, it's man-made, isn't it? | ||
| And that man's name is Joe Biden, isn't it? | ||
| Senator, I think that we all experience the complexities of a global pandemic and the economy is still, in many ways, The National Association of Home Builders says that this new standard is going to add $31,000 on top of all of this inflation to the cost of a new home. | ||
| Job estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics are consistently false. | ||
| Financial media outlets have reported the numbers are repeatedly false. | ||
| Why should we continue to fund the Bureau of Labor Statistics when it's clearly not fulfilling its duties? | ||
| The Bureau of Labor Statistics puts out the most reliable data about our workforce, about unemployment, about job growth in industries that there is. | ||
| Okay, never to this level have the numbers been so inaccurate. | ||
| So who is responsible for this and has anybody been held accountable? | ||
| That's right. We have a rogue criminal government working for BlackRock and the CBDC, you don't know what ESGs are, you're gonna learn. | ||
| I know most of you do. And the social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Monday, May 6th, in the year of our Lord, 2024. | |
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to The American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Very happy to be here with you today. | ||
| We've got a lot to talk about. | ||
| Even though it's a bit of a slow news day, no major breaking headlines. | ||
| That doesn't mean there's not still an infinite amount of things to get into and cover and pick apart here. | ||
| I was having a conversation with my dad this weekend. | ||
| It reminded me of just how far we have to go and what our mission continues to be. | ||
| Always has been, but... | ||
| Just sort of a reaffirmation of this. | ||
| Basically, he was telling me a story. | ||
| He wrangled some invite to a fancy dinner. | ||
| So Houston, Texas, and River Oaks with a bunch of millionaires and billionaires sitting around the table. | ||
| And he says they're all talking about politics. | ||
| They all hate Trump. And he's just sort of nodding quietly along. | ||
| And they ask him, what do you think about all this? | ||
| And first of all, it's funny the way that he phrased it. | ||
| He's like, I start off by basically just pleading total ignorance. | ||
| Going, I could be wrong about all this. | ||
| I don't know. And if I'm wrong, I want to know. | ||
| So tell me. Correct me if I'm wrong. | ||
| That's how you have to butter these people up. | ||
| You can't just say, here's what the facts are. | ||
| Because they go, you sound so arrogant. | ||
| You sound so arrogant when you just say the way things are. | ||
| You have to pat it first. | ||
| You have to lay down the soft landing zone. | ||
| I'm going to tell you some things that you might not have heard before. | ||
| Just be prepared. | ||
| Don't get mad at me about this. | ||
| Which is funny, something we've all kind of experienced. | ||
| It's a little annoying, but that's the psychological programming. | ||
| But regardless, you've got all these people, probably eight or ten people at the table, who do international business deals. | ||
| They've got programs in other countries. | ||
| They're wheeling and dealing, million-dollar deals here, billion-dollar deals there. | ||
| Not one of them knew that the Federal Reserve was a private company. | ||
| Every single one of them was under the impression that the Federal Reserve was a branch of the government. | ||
| It just reminds you, it just goes to show. | ||
| I mean, we've talked about it before. We talk about Klaus Schwab just offhandedly now, right? | ||
| Everybody knows who Klaus Schwab is in our audience. | ||
| Go out on the average person, go out on the street and meet the average person. | ||
| They've never heard of the World Economic Forum. | ||
| They've never heard of Klaus Schwab. | ||
| They have no idea the Federal Reserve is a private company. | ||
| I mean, they are so far behind, all right? | ||
| So that would be the first thing that we have to... | ||
| Wrap our minds around is just how far gone or just how far to go these people have to catch up. | ||
| And that's like the very basics. | ||
| And these are not uninformed people. | ||
| These are highly informed people. | ||
| They're just highly misinformed people. | ||
| That's the first thing. The other thing is, again, this idea of people being unwilling to recognize that there are evil people in the world. | ||
| It seems so, and it's weird because it's not true that they don't recognize evil in the world. | ||
| They will definitely recognize evil. | ||
| If you talk about Hitler, they get it. | ||
| Yeah, he was evil. They understand, yeah, sometimes people, even powerful ones, especially powerful ones, they'll get into positions of power and be able to bend people to their will, be able to manipulate people. | ||
| They get it. | ||
| But when it comes to America, for some reason, it just doesn't compute. | ||
| They just cannot conceive of the idea that people in our system of government are not acting in an upright way. | ||
| It's truly bizarre. | ||
| And I know, I mean, this is like so cliche at this point because we all sort of know this, but it's sort of worth reaffirming that this has to be our mission. | ||
| We have to inform people. | ||
| The idea that people don't even know the Federal Reserve is a private company – They have no idea about the World Economic Forum. | ||
| They have no idea there are these international cabals that are running things. | ||
| This isn't a conspiracy theory. | ||
| It's just a fact. It's just paying attention to things that aren't presented to us by the mainstream media. | ||
| So we've got to inform people. But hand in hand with that is the understanding that there are wicked, evil, manipulative, narcissistic, egotistical scumbags that are running our world. | ||
| And of course this goes to what, you know, the constant refrain we have on this show, which is just, it's on purpose. | ||
| This is all on purpose. This is all by design. | ||
| It's not hard to understand, really, when you get right down to it. | ||
| But it's a mental hurdle that the vast majority of regular people cannot get over. | ||
| And I really don't know what is behind it. | ||
| You know, what it reminds me of is under COVID, like when COVID was going on, I'd be talking to people that were scientists, you know, worked at CERN or whatever. | ||
| And you go, yeah, this Anthony Fauci guy is really a scumbag. | ||
| And they would get personally offended. | ||
| It was like I was insulting their mother. | ||
| I was like, you don't know this guy. | ||
| You don't know who this guy is. | ||
| You've never even heard of this guy before this year. | ||
| You've done no research into him. | ||
| You have no idea what his history is like. | ||
| You have no reason to trust him other than he's behind a podium or put up on mainstream media and you're told not to question this guy. | ||
| And yet, when I tell you, yeah, actually that guy's not trustworthy at all, they get personally insulted. | ||
| They're emotionally attached to this random little gnome that they've never actually met. | ||
| And maybe there's something to that. | ||
| My dad's theory is that these people do well in this system, and so when you question the system, it's like you're trying to steal all of their success. | ||
| It's like if they've succeeded in a system that's thoroughly corrupt and degenerate, that means they're corrupt and degenerate. | ||
| So that can't be true. So therefore the system must be good. | ||
| And therefore all these problems must just be natural consequence of unpredictable behavior. | ||
| It certainly can't be that the people at the top are actively trying to make things worse. | ||
| That could never happen. | ||
| They refuse to get over that mental hurdle. | ||
| But... It's a very short hurdle. | ||
| You should pick your foot up a little bit. | ||
| You can just step right over it. Just understand. | ||
| Just don't give these people the benefit of the doubt when they've done nothing to earn it. | ||
| Don't give them your trust when they're entirely untrustworthy and they prove that over and over again. | ||
| So it sort of feels like stepping backwards in a way because we're so far beyond this point now. | ||
| Like our audience, this is just reminding you of what you already know. | ||
| But if we can't make inroads into the wider mainstream public, if we can't get this message out to the vast majority of people that need to hear it, then what are we doing here? | ||
| I understand that everybody here knows, but our goal collectively has to be to break through whatever mind control the vast majority of people are under. | ||
| Break through and It's the classic imagery. | ||
| Break them out of the matrix. Break them out of Plato's cave. | ||
| Just force them to sever the chains that are binding them to the wall and turn around and see the world for what it is, not just the shadows making colorful shapes. | ||
| So that has to be our mission. | ||
| That is the mission of the Infowar. | ||
| That's just another little reminder of how far we have to go. | ||
| Again, you think you've And it's funny because I just... | ||
| You're scrolling through Twitter for me. | ||
| Personally, I have such a bizarre mix of people that I follow. | ||
| And even on the flat earth side of things, seeing the flat earthers, it's like this constant, like, we're on the cusp of breaking through. | ||
| The awakening is happening. | ||
| And then you got... Talk to the average person. | ||
| It's like everybody, we have this feeling, we have this perspective because of the people we follow on Twitter, the programs that we listen to, that like the awakening is on. | ||
| And it is to some extent. | ||
| Everybody's recognizing that things are not going well. | ||
| Everybody's recognizing that things are coming to a head. | ||
| World War III is starting. | ||
| They just have no idea why. | ||
| They have no idea why. | ||
| How coordinated and orchestrated this destruction has been. | ||
| They can maybe see the effects. | ||
| But for some reason they can't put two and two together and see where this eventually goes and how we're being driven towards a desired goal, not an accidental one. | ||
| So that's our mission. We'll try to fulfill it here. | ||
| We also have my speech from VDare has come out. | ||
| We'll talk a little bit about... | ||
| I'll show you some clips from that. | ||
| And we'll talk about... How the prophecy is coming true. | ||
| I mean, we told you early on they can go after Infowars the way that they have and nobody will stand up for us. | ||
| They're only going to come after everybody else after. | ||
| And now it's basically every non-mainstream media and even the mainstream media conservative outlets like Fox are being systematically destroyed, dismantled. | ||
| And eviscerated through lawfare. | ||
| BDAR is one. OAN is another. | ||
| Newsmax is a third. They're all being destroyed now in a very systematic way. | ||
| And we'll talk about how we resist that. | ||
| Lots of videos to show you. | ||
| Let's get into it. Enough rambling from me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
me. | |
| Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, folks, here it is, your daily dispatch for Monday, the 6th of May, 2024. | ||
| Trump hush money trial. | ||
| Third week in this hush money trial. | ||
| The conspiracy unravels. | ||
| Prosecutors move deeper into ex-president's orbit. | ||
| Prosecutors in Donald Trump's hush money trial are moving deeper into his orbit, following an inside-the-room account about the former president's reaction to politically damaged recording that surfaced during the final weeks of the 2016 campaign. | ||
| Yeah, okay, so we're just entering the, what, seventh, eighth year of the walls are closing in on Donald Trump. | ||
| Honestly, what are they even talking about? | ||
| This all has to do with a mislabeled money transfer. | ||
| That wasn't even technically mislabeled. | ||
| It was just a money transfer to a lawyer that was labeled legal fees that then went to Paying off Stormy Daniels not to go public with her dirt. | ||
| What are they even talking about? | ||
| How can it take three weeks to get through this? | ||
| And of course, the reality is that they're not even talking about what the case is about. | ||
| They're talking about 2016 and the tape from the Bushes about Trump grabbing women. | ||
| What does that have to do with anything? | ||
| What are we even doing here? | ||
| This is just the biggest fraud ever pulled in front of the American people, and they're just doing it out in the open. | ||
| It's just okay. | ||
| Insiders. They're getting an insider's view of the chaos that happened in the Trump campaign when the Access Hollywood tape came out. | ||
| It's like, so what are we talking about here? | ||
| It's supposed to be a hush money trial about Stormy Daniels. | ||
| What? What are we doing? | ||
| What are we doing here? | ||
| We'll get into that a little bit later. | ||
| Meanwhile, in yet another slap in the face of the American regime, Israel is conducting an attack on Rafah. | ||
| Palestinians ordered to evacuate parts of Rafah as assault looms. | ||
| Israel's army has told Palestinians to temporarily evacuate from parts of Rafah in southern Gaza signaling that a ground invasion is imminent. | ||
| People were told to move to Mawasi, a Israel-declared humanitarian area near the coast. | ||
| The Israel army ordered some 100,000 Palestinians on Monday to begin evacuating from the southern city of Rafah, signaling that a long-promised ground invasion could be imminent in further complicating efforts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza. | ||
| We actually have some videos of that we could show you. | ||
| Israel described Rafa as the last significant Hamas stronghold after seven months of war and has repeatedly said the invasion is necessary to defeat the Islamic militant group which unleashed the current conflict with an attack on Israel on October 7th. | ||
| Yeah, we'll get a little bit more into what's going on in Israel a little bit later, what's going on in Gaza. | ||
| But the airstrikes have begun. | ||
| And of course, this is what the American regime has been telling the Israeli leadership not to do for the last several weeks. | ||
| But they're doing it anyway, obviously. | ||
| Because why wouldn't they? | ||
| Because our supposed red lines against Israel are illusionary, not real. | ||
| They also voted to... | ||
| Ban Al Jazeera in the country and have cleared out Al Jazeera's offices in Tel Aviv, confiscating equipment and shutting down that outlet because it's the only democracy in the Middle East after all. | ||
| Here's the footage of them actually confiscating and dismantling the Al Jazeera studios in Israel, in Tel Aviv. | ||
| Just wonderful. I'll go to clip 15 here as this is a major story happened yesterday. | ||
| Not necessarily a major story, but an extremely bizarre one. | ||
| Assassin's gun jams as he tries to kill Pastor during Sunday service. | ||
| So including Mario Emanuel, this is the second time in the last few weeks that an assassination has been attempted on a Christian leader during a live stream in which the weapon has failed to work. | ||
| So there you're seeing the footage now. | ||
| This guy points his gun, tries to pull at the gun jams, and he gets tackled by... | ||
| People in the audience and the pastor himself wrestles the gun away. | ||
| Divine intervention? | ||
| I don't know, but something's happening. | ||
| Completely insane. | ||
| Jumps in front of the live stream camera, points the gun at the pastor, pulls the trigger, and nothing happens. | ||
| Horrifying, but miraculous. | ||
| Again, completely insane. | ||
| I mean, you know... | ||
| I guess we don't have to really expand on it, but strange how you're not seeing this really talked about at all on mainstream media. | ||
| I didn't see a single word about this on mainstream media except maybe a headline. | ||
| Man's gun jams as he attacks pastor. | ||
| No nationwide call to protect Christian churches. | ||
| No demand that anti-Christian language be censored. | ||
| Despite the fact that it does seem as though Christians, and in particular Christian leadership, being brutally attacked at a very high rate. | ||
| Meanwhile, oh shoot, I forgot to grab. | ||
| We can grab this ad. | ||
| I do want to play it. I don't think we've played it yet. | ||
| I think I had it last week. | ||
| We want to go into those... We're good to go. | ||
| According to Trump's surrogates and supporters who were calling on supporters to make the video go viral, Trump took down the ad, claiming it violates their guidelines. | ||
| Per Daily Mail, Congresswoman Lisa McClain of Michigan sent a letter to Biden calling the scheme a slap in the face to state taxpayers and rolling out the red carpet to illegal immigrants. | ||
| Yeah, they're talking about just the program to give newcomers $500 a month, pay for their rent, pay for their, just subsidize them in every possible way. | ||
| And now Google is censoring that ad. | ||
| I don't even know what the justification for banning the ad is. | ||
| Not that they need one. | ||
| I mean, the censorship Google has carried out on behalf of the regime and other places like TikTok and Twitter. | ||
| I mean, they actually had offices for the FBI or portals for law enforcement to go in and flag things to take them down. | ||
| Google, I don't know if there's been any. | ||
| I mean, I'm sure there is in the shadows. | ||
| There's a lot of cooperation. | ||
| But also, this is like an independent conspiracy. | ||
| It's like everybody's just working together on their own, not necessarily. | ||
| Coordinating with each other, but just all working in the same direction for the same goals. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| And so this wouldn't be the first time that Google has censored political ads. | ||
| Which they can do because they have sort of established that their morality is morality. | ||
| And everything that goes against that is hate. | ||
| So if you have a different political opinion, that's not a difference of opinion. | ||
| It's not an... Equal but alternative set of moral principles. | ||
| It's hate. So it has to be shut down. | ||
| So if you're talking about illegal immigration, well, that violates their sense of morality where illegal immigrants are angels and the best people in the world. | ||
| So they'll shut you down by claiming it's hate, despite the fact that you're talking about a very real geopolitical situation. | ||
| You know, they did the same thing with They're spam blocking on phones. | ||
| And we've reported on it before where it was like 70% of text messages from Trump aligned or Republican or conservative aligned groups were marked as spam and not delivered to the people while only about 25% of the Democrat messages were. | ||
| And that's just one of the ways they can just put their thumb on the scale. | ||
| The conservatives just, you know, most of them don't get their fundraising messages out because it's considered spam. | ||
| Democrats, not so much. | ||
| And whatever algorithms they're using to determine that are opaque and not on display for the wider public to even understand how these decisions are being made because they're not being made in a fair or equal way. | ||
| It's very obvious that they're using their authority in the We're good to go. | ||
| A top UN official on Sunday accused Israel of continuing to deny the United Nations humanitarian access in the Gaza Strip where a UN food chief warned a full-blown famine has taken hold in the north of the enclave of 2.3 million people while not a formal famine declaration. | ||
| World Food Program Executive Director Cindy McCain said in an NBC interview broadcast on Sunday that based They're trying so hard to get aid to the people that they're starving. | ||
| I mean, come on. Come on. | ||
| Do we believe any of this? | ||
| I don't even get it anymore. | ||
| Why do they even make these claims that are so obviously untrue? | ||
| What is the point? | ||
| I genuinely want to know. | ||
| When for the last seven months, there's been video after video of the Israeli military saying, we'll deny them food, we'll deny them water. | ||
| Only to turn around and have the Israeli... | ||
| Part of government that's in charge of getting aid to the Gazans are like, we're trying so hard. | ||
| We're really trying our best to get aid there. | ||
| It's an extremely difficult situation. | ||
| Really, because of the bomb? | ||
| What makes it a difficult situation? | ||
| Is it you? | ||
| Are you the one making it a difficult situation? | ||
| Why even publish a statement so obviously contradictory to reality? | ||
| Truly bizarre. So yeah, we still have a lot to talk about here. | ||
| We'll get into the way that Ukraine and Israel, actually, stormed into Easter church services. | ||
| Sunday was Easter for the Orthodox Church. | ||
| And an opportunity for discrimination and oppression by the people who despise Christians. | ||
| In Ukraine and elsewhere. | ||
| We'll get into that a little bit more. | ||
| We'll get into what's happening at Trump's trial. | ||
| We'll make fun of Kristi Noem. | ||
| We got a lot more to come in today's program. | ||
| Please go to Infowarsstore.com to support us. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. Fantastic supplements, incredible prices, and best of all, you keep us on the air and in the fight. | ||
| And when we get back on the other side, we'll play my speech from V-Dare. | ||
| And just like Infowars, V-Dare, OAN, Newsmax, they're all being crushed under the thumb of the regime through illegitimate lawfare. | ||
| Because the last thing they want is us talking about their despicable plans and stopping them. | ||
| I have a speech I like to call Infinite Immigration Forever, How to Build a Revolution-Proof World. | ||
| And of course, I want to thank VDARE for hosting me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's an absolute honor to be asked to speak. | |
| I was only asked a few days ago, so I cobbled together a speech. | ||
| It might be a little disjointed, but hopefully the point comes across because it is an important one. | ||
| And yes, I'm a hosted InfoWars. | ||
| And of course, we confront the globalist conspiracy that is devouring the world on a daily basis. | ||
| And these days, that means we're spread a little bit thin from censorship to foreign wars to trans kids to immigration to the ongoing fallout of the binary weapons system of the lab created virus and the gene altering poisonous so-called vaccine. | ||
| The attacks against humanity are numerous and omnidirectional. | ||
| We simply can't cover all of these things with the attention that they deserve, which is why we rely on publications like VDARE who focus on particular issues like immigration. | ||
| And, of course, the overall theme of this conference is that immigration is sort of the key issue, the superlative issue, the one that rises above all the others. | ||
| And, frankly, I agree with that assessment. | ||
| Why that is the case goes to the very heart of the globalist, anti-human, anti-white, anti-Christ agenda. | ||
| The best way to understand this is actually to work backwards. | ||
| In other words, to look at what the ultimate goal is of the enemies of – what are the enemies of freedom trying to achieve and how are they achieving it? | ||
| What do they ultimately want and how are they trying to get it? | ||
| Well, what they ultimately want is a one-world government, unelected, technocratic bureaucrats that, importantly, will rule forever. | ||
| It all comes down to control. | ||
| It's not about money. It's not about fame or prestige. | ||
| It's about power, the power to control others. | ||
| Quote the great Aldous Huxley, You can do everything with bayonets except sit on them. | ||
| If you want to preserve your power indefinitely, you have to get the consent of the ruled. | ||
| And this they will do, partly by drugs, partly by new techniques of propaganda. | ||
| They'll do it by bypassing the rational side of man and appealing to his subconscious, to his deeper emotion and physiology even, and so making him actually love his slavery. | ||
| And this is the danger. | ||
| After some way, it may make people happy under the new regime, but they will be happy in a situation where they shouldn't be happy. | ||
| He called this the final revolution, the revolution of human organization beyond which further revolution will be impossible. | ||
| You can see how this bears out in comparing the globalist treatment between the West and other countries. | ||
| Why are the Chinese given a free pass? | ||
| Why is it that the most pollution-heavy country is not subject to climate change demands? | ||
| Why is the fastest rising power in the world not subject to demands taken to immigrants? | ||
| The answer is simple. They're already controlled. | ||
| They're not revolting against anybody. | ||
| So they're spared from the suicidal demands of the globalists. | ||
| Just to give you a taste of how thoroughly China is protected from things like immigration, I'd like to read from the Wikipedia article titled Immigration to China. | ||
| I'm not sure if everybody knows that China doesn't have a lot of immigrants. | ||
| Do you know how few they actually have? | ||
| This is what it says, quote, Immigration to the People's Republic of China is the international movement of non-Chinese nationals in order to reside permanently in the country. | ||
| In the late 70s, roughly 300,000 ethnic Chinese immigrants came from Vietnam to China. | ||
| And that's pretty much it. | ||
| That's it. That is the story of immigration into China. | ||
| In 2016, China issued just 1,500 permanent residency cards. | ||
| This was more than double they'd issued the previous year, but still roughly 750 times lower than the United States' 1.2 million at the time. | ||
| You see, China's under control, so they get to have a culture and prosperity and permanence. | ||
| The West alone still harbors the impulse for radical change and the ability to implement it. | ||
| And so it must be destroyed. It's really not that complicated. | ||
| If you're at war with various enemies, you focus on the enemies with the weapons and the spirit to destroy you. | ||
| You systematically eliminate their defenses and grind down their morale. | ||
| The globalists are at war with humanity, and to them, frankly, white people are the greatest threat. | ||
| a genetic thing? | ||
| Well, the people in power certainly seem to think so. | ||
| They openly demand the destruction of whiteness, and when asked to define whiteness, they list a series of European virtues—self-sufficiency, free speech, hard work, the nuclear family—you know, all of the wonderful things that make life worth living. | ||
| These concepts have been forged over millennia by the European And if you don't agree with me, if you think that's racist or something, it doesn't really matter. | ||
| I'm not the one saying it. | ||
| They are. And they're using it as an excuse for racial domination. | ||
| While they're increasingly bold in their open racism against white people, they still cloak their attacks in the disguise of humanitarianism or pragmatism. | ||
| And this, of course, crumbles under the barest investigation. | ||
| So let's examine that by reading a few headlines, which is... | ||
| What I do, just reading mainstream media headlines, and it's all spelled out there for you. | ||
| So first, lay the groundwork, an entry from the Wikipedia for Ireland. | ||
| As of 2022, the population of the entire island is just over 7 million, with 5.1 million living in the Republic of Ireland. | ||
| And then from the Independent and Irish newspaper... | ||
| Ireland needs 4 million migrants to sustain state pension system. | ||
| Okay, so a nation of 5 million apparently needs 4 million migrants to fund the pension program. | ||
| Of course, this begs the question, does the economy exist to serve the people, or do the people exist for the sake of the economy? | ||
| Are you really going to replace four-fifths of your population just so the Ponzi scheme doesn't collapse? | ||
| And the answer is, of course they will. | ||
| But of course, Ireland is not the first country to attempt to take this absurd path. | ||
| So how'd that work out for other places that have tried it? | ||
| Let's take a look at Germany. | ||
| From the European Conservative Germany, nearly 900,000 migrants from 2015 still live on social welfare. | ||
| Of the some 1.8 million asylum seekers who arrived during the first two years of the crisis, only 460,000 are employed, according to the Federal Employment Agency's figures. | ||
| Half of those who are working are employed in Germany's unskilled labor sector, with many still receiving social benefits as a result of their low income. | ||
| Fast forward to today, and from Germany, The German newspaper DW. German debates raising retirement age to 70. | ||
| So is anybody else a bit confused by the logic here? | ||
| You bring in millions of migrants so that they can contribute to your pension funds. | ||
| They all go on welfare and suddenly you can't retire until you're 70. | ||
| Maybe there's an ulterior motive here. | ||
| I want to be called a crazy conspiracy theorist, but if the plan being implemented has the direct opposite outcome of the stated purpose, but they keep doing it anyway, maybe something else is going on. | ||
| I find that we could all use a lesson from my son. | ||
| He's three years old, and he's in a phase where he freaking loves asking the question, why? | ||
| Why? So let's do that, shall we? | ||
| Illegal immigrants are allowed in by the millions. | ||
| Why? Because they claim to be refugees. | ||
| Why? Because the UN and various NGOs instruct them to. | ||
| Why? Because they're trying to flood our countries with foreigners. | ||
| Why? Because they hate white people. | ||
| Why? Because white people have a heritage of resistance to tyranny. | ||
| It's not actually that complicated. | ||
| And you might think that this series, this crisis of immigration we're going through right now can't go on forever. | ||
| After all, there's literally billions of people in the third world. | ||
| So will we just continue to import them? | ||
| Will our system continue to be overwhelmed until it collapses and the movement from the third world to the first becomes pointless because we've reached some form of equilibrium? | ||
| Maybe. | ||
| But actually, when I think about the forces confronting the West today, I see an even more sinister plan in the works. | ||
| Along with demographic replacement, our once Christian moral culture has been wholly reformed into the deracinated, bastardized, plastic, soulless, homogenized monoculture of self-worship and materialism. | ||
| So what happens when a contingent of migrants is absorbed into our country? | ||
| They are immediately and continuously bombarded with the leftist propaganda that we all experience, knowing that license and lasciviousness will always have a greater appeal than virtue and tradition, especially to young people. | ||
| We can expect these migrants to only last a few generations before their grandchildren adopt transgenderism or some other form of suicidal leftism. | ||
| They will then, in turn, be replaced by the next wave of migrants. | ||
| What if that is the ultimate plan? | ||
| A continuous laundry cycle of humanity. | ||
| The First World will continue to produce excess food and material goods, which will be shipped to the Third World to keep their populations growing, and as they move into the First World, their birth rates will drop and they'll die out, making room for the next batch of imports. | ||
| No one group will ever achieve the critical mass necessary to overthrow their rulers. | ||
| Infinite immigration forever. | ||
| It is the perfect model for a revolution-proof world. | ||
| Now, whether you think that's the case or whether you simply don't want immigration because you actually like speaking the same language... | ||
| All right, folks, that's from my speech from VDARE. You can find that on VDARE, it's on Twitter, it's on Rumble, and it'll probably be on Infowars later today. | ||
| I'm going to ask for them to write an article. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side talking about some of the breaking news. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| In this segment, we're going to be going over a variety of different issues. | ||
| That all, to me, relate very intricately to one another. | ||
| It has to do with Christianity and America and around the world. | ||
| I'm just trying to figure out how to lay this out. | ||
| Because I got a bunch of stories here. | ||
| It has to do with education. It has to do with Christianity. | ||
| But of course, this weekend was the triumphant return to Twitter of Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
| And he's been... He hasn't been posting too much, but he's been getting these ratios. | ||
| Which is, of course, where you comment on somebody's post and your comment gets more likes than the post itself. | ||
| It's been fun to see the return. | ||
| He held a space, I guess, last night. | ||
| Maybe the night before, but lots of big names talking on it. | ||
| I thought this little exchange sort of highlighted... | ||
| How the return of Nick Fuentes is going. | ||
| Ed Krasenstein on Twitter says, Last night Nick J. Fuentes claimed that only Christians should be allowed to hold government offices in the United States. | ||
| In other words, Nick Fuentes doesn't believe in the United States Constitution. | ||
| For someone who's so adamant about free speech, I guess it doesn't apply to religions he doesn't agree with. | ||
| Now there's lots of ways to respond to this. | ||
| You could argue the point. | ||
| You could make your case. | ||
| Nick's response is to simply say, I'm right. | ||
| And he's got about three times more likes than the original post. | ||
| And then, of course, the response, right as in what? | ||
| It goes against the U.S. Constitution. | ||
| The idea runs contrary to the principles of secularism and religious freedom that are foundational to the U.S. But I'm right, though. | ||
| But I'm right, though. | ||
| And that's sort of where the debate ends. | ||
| It's just like, okay, but I'm right. | ||
| But what else? And of course, I'm sort of back and forth on this. | ||
| Because on one hand, I don't like the government having religious requirements of anybody ever. | ||
| I do believe in the U.S. Constitution and the right to your religious freedom. | ||
| But at the time that that was written, that meant that you're free to be any type of Protestant you want, basically. | ||
| It's like, yeah, you can be Catholic, I guess. | ||
| It's kind of pushing it. I sort of understood that all that meant was that the government itself wouldn't have a specific denomination that it operated under and controlled. | ||
| And the issue, but of course the problem is that anybody can say they're Christian. | ||
| If you say, okay, you have to be Christian to be in the United States government, guess what? | ||
| Every politician will be Christian. | ||
| Nominally, they'll say that they are. | ||
| Professing Christianity has very little to do with actually embodying the Christian ideals. | ||
| And that really is the point. | ||
| The point is the ideals. The point is the foundational beliefs in Christianity inform everything about our nation. | ||
| And at this point, it's so embedded in our society and our culture that people don't know where it comes from. | ||
| They think that these things are just the natural conclusion of humanity. | ||
| But they're not. They were radical ideas that were so incredibly alien to the cultures to which they were introduced that Christians were usually killed for them. | ||
| And yet now everybody just gets it. | ||
| Just gets the... You should treat others as you like to be treated, turn the other cheek, show mercy. | ||
| I mean, these are the Christian ideals that, frankly, we're losing. | ||
| And you look around at what is going on in the world and a lot of it is perfectly parallel. | ||
| You see the decline of Christian morals and you see the uptick of all of the horrible things that Christianity doesn't allow. | ||
| And the point of this is that In the absence of Christian morals, I'm not here to say the government should dictate what your religion is. | ||
| Absolutely not. But, I think it's incumbent on all of us to look around and ask the question, what set of morals are we operating under, and are they better or worse than Christianity? | ||
| I think it's becoming pretty obvious that in the absence of Christianity, you don't get some secular humanism that promotes decency and morality and ethical behavior. | ||
| It just becomes the worship of sin and yourself and Witchcraft. | ||
| I mean, literal, like, occult witchcraft. | ||
| Like, that's just what moves into the space that Christianity vacates when Christianity vacates it. | ||
| LifeSide News has this story. | ||
| Christian conservatives are winning on education as the left normalizes obscene materials. | ||
| It says, as our culture moves further into the post-Christian age, debates on how Christian families can respond are myriad. | ||
| The Christians have different ways of looking at this, but on one thing everyone unanimously agrees, do not send your kids to public school. | ||
| Recent testimony by Karen England, the executive director of Capital Resource Initiative, highlights this once again. | ||
| England testified before the Tennessee Legislators Education Committee advocating for a bill aiming to have pornography removed from the libraries of government schools. | ||
| England's testimony was graphic, disturbing, and eye-opening. | ||
| Unfortunately, England was not exaggerating. | ||
| Of course, when they read these pornographic books and you think there's no way these are a school. | ||
| I mean, they won't even let them read the books at the school board meetings, but they're in your children's library. | ||
| Many of them are already being utilized as educational materials in classroom. | ||
| According to CRI, more than 40 states have exempted public schools and public school libraries from the laws that prohibit the distribution of obscene material to a minor. | ||
| And lawmakers have eliminated any liability associated with these graphic materials if they're used for, quote, educational purposes as part of courses of instruction and or in libraries in K through 12 schools. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So this is the problem. | |
| I mean, how do you justify keeping pornography out of the hands of children without some sort of moral framework that. | ||
| Dictates your stance. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I guess you can't. | ||
| I guess if you're a leftist, you can just use whatever rhetorical workaround you want to justify giving porn to children. | ||
| But I'd say it's just immoral. | ||
| That's not an argument. If morality doesn't matter and everything is equal and all religions are equivalent and that includes the unstructured but still nevertheless very religious belief system of the rainbow flag. | ||
| And it gets even worse. | ||
| Robbie Starbuck The Chicago's Teacher Union is demanding a new contract that pays for free abortions, $2,000 for each illegal immigrant, for unused schools to be turned into migrant homes, and they want the ability to lie to parents about their kids' gender identity and $50 billion in wage hikes to take their average salary from $93,000 to $144,000 by 2027. | ||
| For context, the entire state of Illinois only brought in $50 billion in taxes next year, but they want a $50 billion wage hike for their educators. | ||
| They also want educators to be trained yearly on LGBTQ plus issues, also known as forced indoctrination into the woke cult, and have gender-neutral bathrooms in schools. | ||
| Only want to have a newcomer liaison hired at every school for illegal aliens. | ||
| Only 21% of 8th grade kids are proficient readers in Chicago, and they have the gall to ask for this. | ||
| Again, is this about education? | ||
| Or is it about morality? | ||
| I think it has both. | ||
| I think the... | ||
| Again, the morals of Christianity are so baked into our society that we feel like we don't need to protect or stand up for them. | ||
| But the reality is that The traditional moral stance of Christianity in America is being replaced by whatever this is. | ||
| The cult of tolerance. | ||
| The cult of woke. | ||
| Whatever you want to call it. | ||
| And this really bleeds into everything. | ||
| It has to do with whether the parents have the ultimate say and control over their children or whether that can be outsourced to the government. | ||
| Honor thy father and mother. | ||
| It's a biblical family structure, the nuclear family. | ||
| That's being destroyed. | ||
| The persistence and degeneracy of sin. | ||
| If you're not a Christian, you don't have a Christian moral base, I guess you can justify hiding the gender identity of children from the parents. | ||
| As we lose Christianity, especially in the education system, it's not being replaced by some, you know, secular humanism that's just as good as Christianity. | ||
| If that was the case, it would just be Christianity. | ||
| It's being replaced with something that uses the language of tolerance to push total spiritual death. | ||
| We'll return to this on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay with us. Welcome back, folks. | |
| This is the American Journal. I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls this hour. | ||
| We'll be joined by Into Thin Air. | ||
| And talk to him about the Antarctic anomaly that has reappeared. | ||
| And we'll also talk about how he's able to predict things like massive tornado swarms. | ||
| So that'll be the third hour, but this hour we'll take your calls and continue to talk about the news of the day. | ||
| The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Now, you may say that... | ||
| Well, you may say that the claim that I guess... | ||
| Nick made that you shouldn't be allowed in our government if you're not Christian. | ||
| Might be against the Constitution. | ||
| You might say it's ineffective because people can pretend to be Christian. | ||
| That doesn't actually mean anything. | ||
| But I'd say whatever it turned out to look like, it'd be better than whatever we have now. | ||
| I think if people at least ostensibly had to Pretend to be Christian, it would be better than whatever we have now. | ||
| Because what we have now is clearly anti-Christian in the most fundamental way that it is an alternative set of moral principles that are not in any way designed to better the lives of the people who live under them. | ||
| And I really just see, I see this throughout so many of these stories. | ||
| We've got this from May 2021, Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction, Dismantling Racism in Mathematics Instruction. | ||
| They say this tool provides teachers an opportunity to examine their actions, beliefs, and values around teaching mathematics. | ||
| Actions, beliefs, and values. | ||
| See, it's a new system of beliefs and values that they're being instructed in, that children are being indoctrinated into. | ||
| Meaning that the old system of values and beliefs is being done away with. | ||
| The thing I think people forget about Christianity is that it provides the groundwork for all of these things that, frankly, at this point have been taken too far, but in their Platonic sense are good. | ||
| Anti-racism, right? | ||
| The belief that every human being is equally valuable in the eyes of God. | ||
| That's a Christian concept. | ||
| The idea behind Christianity being something that a person has to choose to be a part of is sort of fundamental to our understanding of the individual and the choices that we make. | ||
| In other words, Islam, you can just force somebody to be Islamic. | ||
| You can just get them to say the thing that makes them Islamic and that's that. | ||
| Christianity, it doesn't really matter what you say. | ||
| What matters is what you actually do and believe and think. | ||
| And God knows that. | ||
| Nobody else does. So in a weird way, it's like Christianity sets the foundation for things like anti-racism. | ||
| And then these things are taken... | ||
| And taken too far by people who don't understand the moral imperative undergirding this concept and sort of extrapolated to be anti-racism, which is just racism in any other name, which means you're violating the fundamental moral principle while still using the language of Christianity. | ||
| They say the framework for deconstructing racism in mathematics offers essential characteristics of anti-racist math educators and critical approaches to dismantling white supremacy in math classrooms by making visible the toxic characteristics of white supremacy culture with respect to math. | ||
| Yeah, it's everywhere, right? | ||
| It's ubiquitous. It's in math. | ||
| It's in literature. | ||
| It's in history. | ||
| It's a destruction of what they call white supremacy, but what is in fact the West, what used to be called Christendom, and the society built on Christian ideals. | ||
| That's being destroyed. Alright, welcome back, folks. | ||
| Maybe I'm the one that sort of sees the continuity stringing between each of these stories. | ||
| You've got the Chicago's Teachers Union demanding $50 billion more in new contracts, including housing for illegal immigrant students, including abortion coverage, including surrogacy leave. | ||
| So the faculty who rent women to birth babies can take time off. | ||
| The union demands an allowance for a day of civic action to assist students who are of age to register and vote, to cast votes, to facilitate union and student activism. | ||
| LGBTQ plus safe spaces or safe schools, i.e. keeping parents in the dark, are also among the demands. | ||
| The union proclaiming that the teachers must keep students' gender identity secret from their parents. | ||
| Queer competency will also be required under the new contract. | ||
| And ESG pension investments. | ||
| Pronouns, pronouns he, she, and his, her, have changed to they and their throughout the contract. | ||
| The union demands an allowance. | ||
| Absences related to verbal assault would also be compensated under the new contract. | ||
| If someone says something you don't like, I guess you can take a day off. | ||
| You've got things, and of course all this is just... | ||
| An outgrowth of things like this, pathway to equitable math instruction, dismantling racism in mathematics instruction, where they talk more about beliefs and values than about math. | ||
| And they call this an end to white supremacy. | ||
| Of course, it doesn't exist anywhere in the world at this point, but don't let reality get in the way of a good crusade. | ||
| Christian conservatives are winning on education as the left normalizes obscene materials. | ||
| Talking about the pornography shown to children and how they're somehow able to circumvent laws against that by doing it in schools as if that makes any sense whatsoever. | ||
| How the average non-idiot leftist parent does not want their children subjected to this indoctrination but they're doing it anyway. | ||
| Of course, it goes deeper than that. | ||
| U.S. Military Academy introduces woke curriculum with courses on deconstructing patriotism, cross-dressing in the military, gender norms, and representation in the ranks. | ||
| United States Military Academy at West Point is introducing a new curriculum that includes courses on deconstructing patriotism, cross-dressing in the military, and other topics related to gender norms. | ||
| These courses are part of a broader initiative by the Biden regime to integrate diversity, equity and inclusion propaganda into the curriculum over duty, honor and country. | ||
| That sort of is the replacement, isn't it? | ||
| Duty, honor and country have been replaced by diversity, equity and inclusion. | ||
| Former Navy SEAL and Representative Scott Taylor tweeted his concerns after the curriculum was reportedly shared with him, stating, This was sent to me classed at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point. | ||
| Quite sure China and Russia are not teaching this nonsense of their officers. | ||
| Fix yourself. The controversial courses are deconstructing patriotism, uniformed perspectives, the evolution of cross-dressing in the military, and gender norms. | ||
| Do my leaders get me? | ||
| Unpacking the importance of representation in the military, harder rights and approach to espouse values and behavioral inconsistency. | ||
| Again, the moral norms of our country are just being systematically disintegrated. | ||
| Pro-life hospice groups launches Do Not Euthanize a registry to protect Canadian patients. | ||
| One of Canada's only fully pro-life hospices, the Delta Hospice Society, has launched a new Do Not Euthanize national registry that says will help defend vulnerable citizens' lives from premature death by euthanasia. | ||
| That's the point that it's getting to. | ||
| The death cult of liberalism. | ||
| It's achieving its final form, where you actually have to fight against the government not to kill you. | ||
| Over the last couple of years, we've given out thousands of our Do Not Euthanize advance directives across Canada. | ||
| We're making the wishes of our people known and putting them into legally binding, provincially specific advance directives, Ireland said to LifeSite News. | ||
| Our D&Es, Do Not Euthanize, put into writing that people have no interest in being executed by the state via MAID. We want health care not to be euthanized. | ||
| It's sort of horrifying. This is the reality. | ||
| This is the reality when you have a morality that is based off of something other than the sacredness of human life, the abhorrence of murder, no matter how it's couched, the understanding and adherence to reality over the delusion of the leftist gender cult. | ||
| All of this is a spiritual issue. | ||
| You can make very good, logical, economic distinctions or arguments in favor of euthanasia. | ||
| You just have to forget that what you're doing is horrifying sin. | ||
| If you can get over the fact that what you're arguing for is just abominable from a human spiritual level, you can make very good arguments for it. | ||
| In the same way, I was listening to Keith Woods talk about something on his podcast about how the only way that we have to measure success at this point is GDP. So if you... | ||
| Only care about the monetary outflow or inflow of your country. | ||
| You can make arguments in favor of immigration as long as you ignore the moral aspects of it. | ||
| What's wrong with replacing an entire people wholesale through immigration? | ||
| Well, nothing if all you have to go on is the Monetary outcome. | ||
| It's a good thing. | ||
| The thing that's bad about it is a spiritual moral issue. | ||
| If you can get rid of the religion that undergirds them, then they're no longer a barrier to your exploitation. | ||
| UK school reports parents who refuse to affirm daughter's transgender identity to child protective services. | ||
| Again, this is happening throughout the West. | ||
| It's already happening here in even red states in America. | ||
| Where parents who don't go along with the indoctrination of their children into this suicidal anti-Christian death cult will be reported to the CPS and maybe have their kids taken away by the state and given to somebody who's more amenable to the cross-sex hormones, puberty blockers, and sex change surgeries. | ||
| Even the parents writing their stories in a book called Tales from the Homefront in the Fight to Save Our Kids Have to remain anonymous in order to maintain their relationships with their children and to avoid being targeted by trans activists. | ||
| Honor thy father and mother. | ||
| It's a bit inconvenient to the people who would rather take children from their parents and give them to perverts. | ||
| Knowing of this from Infowars, liberals three times more biased about their opponents than conservatives, new study claims. | ||
| Liberals are three times more biased when evaluating their opponents than conservatives are, according to a new study by Journal of Social Psychology. | ||
| This runs totally counter to the widespread belief that conservatives are less open-minded and more prejudiced than liberals. | ||
| The researchers behind the study wanted to test the popular hypothesis that conservatives are more prone to prejudice and have greater inclination to authoritarianism than liberals. | ||
| It has become clear that the ideological divide in the United States is growing and that people are becoming more polarized in their beliefs. | ||
| Ideological asymmetry is the notion that conservatives are more prejudicial than liberals, but the worldview conflict hypothesis suggests that conservatives and liberals can be equally prejudiced towards those with different worldviews and values. | ||
| I wanted to pit these two theories against each other to see who would be more likely to aggress indirectly against a person who held an ideology different than theirs. | ||
| I wanted to see if simply posting support on social media for a conservative or liberal position would be sufficient to elicit indirect aggression from a person with a different ideology in a domain that is completely unrelated to politics. | ||
| The research created an experiment where participants were asked to evaluate political memes shared on social media. | ||
| They were told the memes had been shared by candidates looking for a job. | ||
| Participants did not know they were being evaluated on their own political biases. | ||
| In particular the researchers wanted to see how the content of the memes affected the perception of the person who shared them. | ||
| That included the extent to which their perceiver felt aggressive feelings towards the person who shared the memes based on their implied political beliefs. | ||
| As expected, conservatives and liberals both assessed content that aligned with their own beliefs favorably and content that didn't negatively. | ||
| However, the difference in assessments was much greater among liberals who assessed conservatives three times as harshly as conservatives assessed liberals. | ||
| I was very surprised by the liberal bias against conservatives was nearly three times greater than was conservative bias towards liberals. | ||
| This is the direct opposite of what ideological asymmetry would predict. | ||
| I was also surprised that given this result, liberal participants claimed that conservatives were much more prejudiced than liberals, whereas conservatives did not attribute any more prejudice to liberals than to conservatives. | ||
| This is contrary to much popular opinion about liberals and conservatives in popular media and empirical literature. | ||
| Again, I would say this just has to do with the moral underpinnings of the beliefs that inform liberal and conservative worldviews. | ||
| There's just something intangible, something metaphysical, something sort of superlative about, like overwrought. | ||
| That's not the right word. | ||
| There's a spiritual dimension to the thinking that even if not consciously addressed, is still there. | ||
| That as conservatives, that means you believe in the traditional structures of the Western world, which means you have a worldview that's informed by Christian ideals. | ||
| Meaning that you have a spiritual and moral imperative to not discriminate, not have prejudice. | ||
| Take everyone that you meet as a child of God that's, you know, worth... | ||
| Listening to and hearing from, even if you disagree with them. | ||
| Liberals, however, think that they can throw the baby out with the bathwater. | ||
| Even if unconsciously or subconsciously. | ||
| They don't believe in fairness. | ||
| Like, very simply, they don't believe in the moral underpinnings That are informed by Christianity. | ||
| So to them, it's all material. | ||
| It's all physical. There's no spiritual realm to this. | ||
| So it's just a matter of power, a matter of resources. | ||
| It's a matter of vengeance over forgiveness or vindictiveness over understanding. | ||
| And this informs all of their decisions and all of their actions on the world stage. | ||
| And you can see this in places like Ukraine and Israel where this weekend was the Orthodox Christian Easter. | ||
| And in both Ukraine and Israel you had videos coming out of the oppression that Christians face even on their holiest day, Easter Sunday. | ||
| We can go to clip number 18 here. | ||
| This is a church in Ukraine. | ||
| I believe it's the priest being hauled out in this particular video. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. There you go. | |
| Forcibly hauled out. | ||
| This might be an Israeli clip. | ||
| It's kind of confusing. | ||
| This was happening at the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem and in Orthodox Christian churches in Ukraine. | ||
| Clip number eight here. | ||
| Christian church growers celebrating Orthodox Easter thrown out of their churches and arrested. | ||
| This is in Ukraine. As Rachel Wilson notes, we just let this play as B-roll here and pull down the audio. | ||
| It's just a lot of screaming and yelling. | ||
| About a bunch of old Ukrainian women being bodily shoved out of the church by guys with Ukraine flags on their shoulders. | ||
| Rachel Wilson on Twitter says this. | ||
| The Ukraine NWO government has outlawed the canonical Orthodox Church and installed a fake state church in its place. | ||
| They're persecuting the real church, but lying and saying they're agents of Russia. | ||
| The Bolsheviks did the same, but tried to replace the church with atheism. | ||
| They learned their lesson. | ||
| Now they just create a fake church. | ||
| And again, it seems everywhere America goes, Christianity is just eviscerated in that area. | ||
| It happened in the Middle East over the last 20 years. | ||
| It's happening in Ukraine now, as we speak. | ||
| And of course, that's the situation in Israel as well. | ||
| And then, of course, you have all of the other attacks against Christians with the stabbing attack of Mari Emanuel. | ||
| The second time this month we've seen a pastor attack the lethal weapon and the weapon fail to work. | ||
| In the instance yesterday of gunmen trying to shoot a pastor and it failing. | ||
| So, a big takeaway here is Christianity is under attack in a variety of different ways. | ||
| Some subtle, some overt, some state-sponsored, some independent. | ||
| But the overall outcome of this is that the concept of human rights and fairness and anti-discrimination and free speech, all of these things that were born from a deeply Christian society are going away with the spiritual underpinnings that informed them in the first place. | ||
| Again, I don't know if requiring people in our government to be Christian is the right idea. | ||
| The best possible outcome would be for people in our government and in our education system and everywhere else simply on their own initiative recognize and value the importance of the Christian morals in our society and uphold them not necessarily because they believe in them on a spiritual level but because even on a tangible, | ||
| worldly, temporal level Moving away from these morals and underpinnings are clearly just paving the path towards horrors, towards man-made horrors beyond our comprehension. | ||
| Let's go to our callers now. | ||
| J.R. in New York wants to talk about why it's important for them to destroy Christianity. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, J.R. You're on the air. | ||
| Hey, what's happening, Harrison? | ||
| Thanks for taking my call. | ||
| So, it's the Sabbatine Frankist cult. | ||
| And basically, their objective is to destroy Christianity. | ||
| And the reason why is because Jesus is the ultimate catalyst for self-transformation and for coming to know God. | ||
| Obviously, right? | ||
| But it's not just by just saying, I believe in Jesus. | ||
| You have to actually do what he did, which is to change your ways, to change who you are. | ||
| And so they obviously have to replace that with There are lies because the true trans... | ||
| Jesus was the first transhumanist in the sense that he transformed himself and went beyond his humanity. | ||
| They've hijacked the idea of transhumanism and given us this garbage with this digital nonsense, etc. | ||
| But he is the ultimate alchemical agent, and that's why this is all being foisted on us. | ||
| We're not doing anything about it. | ||
| Obviously, we're way past... | ||
| Legality as far as the Constitution. | ||
| I don't even want to say, you know, like, Second Amendment. | ||
| Obviously, we're beyond tyranny here. | ||
| So we're just allowing this to happen, and God does try us through pain and suffering. | ||
| So this is all up to us, and there's no one we can trust. | ||
| Like, Elon Musk, on April 25th, posted an upside-down pentagram, you know, with his Tesla insignia there. | ||
| He did it on purpose, upside-down. | ||
| He works for them. He's collecting all of our data, and they're going to use this all to go after anti-Semites when the time comes. | ||
| So I'm just kind of concerned because I'm pretty open. | ||
| I feel like anybody who calls into this show is definitely going to come after us, and I really don't care. | ||
| And what you posted on your Twitter, which just was fascinating. | ||
| I can't remember exactly what you said, but it was basically... | ||
| I'm not in this for money. | ||
| Come get me, bitch. You know, it's pretty much... | ||
| You pretty much said that. | ||
| So, I don't know, man. | ||
| It's just... This is their show. | ||
| The Sabatine Frankest cult. | ||
| I recommend looking into the... | ||
| I call it the triumvirate of death. | ||
| We got Adam Weishaupt, Amsel Rothschild, and Jacob Frank. | ||
| Those are the three that formed the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776. | ||
| And those are the ones that they immediately got into our system. | ||
| Jacob Frank was the reincarnation, claimed to be the reincarnation of Sabbatai Zevi, who is the leader of this Sabbatean Frankist cult. | ||
| Their doctrine is redemption through sin. | ||
| They also believe in the Messiah. | ||
| They believe that the Messiah will return through total degradation of society. | ||
| That they will force Jesus. | ||
| Not Jesus. To them, it's not Jesus. | ||
| They'll force the Messiah to return. | ||
| So this is why it's as crazy as it is, because it's all being done on purpose. | ||
| Because for them, like I said the other day, it's black magic alchemy. | ||
| The true transhumanism is coming to know Jesus, changing your life. | ||
| So that's why they want to get in there, poison our children against us, against the book, the Bible. | ||
| And basically go in that direction. | ||
| Go ahead, bro. No, yeah, I completely agree. | ||
| And, I mean, that is the thing. | ||
| To me, it's all about control. | ||
| It's all about they want humanity to serve them and them alone. | ||
| And if you serve God, that's offensive to them. | ||
| That's competition that they want to do away with. | ||
| So... The post I posted saying, you think you can bribe me? | ||
| Sorry, do it. I'm quoting Elon Musk here, but I love when he was like, you think you can bribe me with money? | ||
| It's like, you think you can buy my soul? | ||
| You think, I don't know, it's invaluable worth? | ||
| No, that's not going to happen. | ||
| I serve a higher calling, and that's what they really don't want. | ||
| want. | ||
| They want to cut you off from the source, cut you off from the ability to either, you know, understand and to learn how to be saved or to even have the physical or mental capability to be saved. | ||
| If you are transhumanist, if you are, if you transition away from human into something else, you're, you're giving up your soul and you're, you're, you know, surrendering paradise to them. | ||
| So I think you're exactly right. | ||
| And I really don't have too much to add. | ||
| You Yeah, and people should look into the Sabbatean frankest. | ||
| It's an important aspect of what created the world that we live in now. | ||
| Thank you for the call, JR. Quickly, let's go to Judy in Florida. | ||
| You say you consider yourself a real Christian. | ||
| You want to talk about the Christian aspect of what we're discussing today. | ||
| Go ahead, Judy. You're on the air. | ||
| Hi. It's nice to speak with you again. | ||
| Can I ask you a quick question? | ||
| Sure. How tall are you? I'm 6'2". | ||
| Yeah, when I first started listening to you, when you're behind the desk, I thought you were like an average height. | ||
| No, I'm a heroic height. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I love it. | |
| That's wonderful. But, yeah, there's a couple things that I think are real important that I want to discuss. | ||
| And this is something, this is the scripture that I would ask that everybody write down, because it's extremely important. | ||
| It is the rich man in hell. | ||
| It's Luke 16 verses 19 through 31. | ||
| So Luke 16, 19 through 31. | ||
| And you'll see why it's important once you read it. | ||
| But something I want to read, if it's okay, from the Bible that I think is very pertinent to what you're talking about right now, is in the book of Genesis, chapter 3, verses 1-6. | ||
| Verse 1 is, Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. | ||
| And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of the tree of the garden? | ||
| And the woman said to the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the tree of the garden. | ||
| But the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat, neither shall ye touch, lest ye die. | ||
| And the serpent said unto the woman, Yea, ye shall not surely die. | ||
| That's what it all comes back to. | ||
| We'll cover that on the other side. | ||
| Stay with us. We're going to move on to some other major goings-on around the world. | ||
| But just to sort of finish up, sort of wrap up with the Christian stuff, I do find it incredibly interesting how not only does it seem as though Revelations is being fulfilled, the last book of the Bible, but the first book of the Really informs you as to what the ultimate goal of the globalist is. | ||
| I mean, that is the craziest part, is the ultimate conclusion of this human experiment is the fulfillment of the promise of the serpent in the Garden of Eden that our caller Judy was just pointing out. | ||
| And again, I want to play this video that we played, I think on Friday, of Klaus Schwab Talking about this topic in particular, and this is really what you need to understand when it comes to globalists and globalism and where they're going and why they're doing the things that they're doing. | ||
| They believe that they are on the cusp of immortality. | ||
| They think that either through reverse aging or technological advancements, they will live forever. | ||
| You can't have everybody live forever. | ||
| That's unsustainable. That's growth without, you know, life without growth. | ||
| I mean, life without death. | ||
| I mean, it just doesn't, it doesn't work. | ||
| So you can only have a few number of people who have access to this technology. | ||
| And what they're doing now is frantically trying to build the system in which people will accept their position as mortals while other human beings have immortality. | ||
| And that's what so much of the brainwashing is heading us towards. | ||
| And you can even talk to people in my personal life. | ||
| When you start talking about the transgenderism stuff, and they go, well, this is just one step in transhumanism. | ||
| We're all working towards becoming gods. | ||
| People say that to me in my own life, like strangers. | ||
| That's what people believe. | ||
| They're into this. | ||
| So let's go now quickly to Klaus Schwab here. | ||
| Getting caught up in the moment. | ||
| He's getting cheers. He's not used to that. | ||
| He's around young people that aren't Chained to a wall. | ||
| He's not used to that either. And so he lets himself get a little carried away and start talking about the transhumanist immortality goals of the elite. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. You have the chance to look forward to a career of 50 years. | |
| In my own opinion, yeah. | ||
| Maybe, maybe more. | ||
| You will get some injections and so on. | ||
| And then, don't forget, your avatar will continue to live. | ||
| And your brain will be replicated through artificial intelligence and algorithm. | ||
| So we don't know. | ||
| But at least 50 years. | ||
| I mean, this is what these people really believe. | ||
| Like, oh, we'll take injections. | ||
| I'll reverse aging. We'll have our brains uploaded into an avatar. | ||
| I mean, that wasn't a prepared statement. | ||
| That was him getting sort of caught up in the moment, maybe revealing a little bit more than he intended. | ||
| And you can hear how the cheers sort of diminish as he keeps going. | ||
| Maybe you'll get an injection and be like, yeah, right, like the vaccine. | ||
| Like, upload your consciousness to the mainframe. | ||
| And they're like... Yeah, I guess we could do that. | ||
| Maybe we'll become a robot. | ||
| People are like, sorry, what? | ||
| He's like, anyway, moving on. | ||
| Let's just move on now. This is what they're really into. | ||
| That's what they're really into. | ||
| Transhumanism, life extension technologies, and setting up a system in which the neo-feudal overlords like Klaus Schwab will be able to live forever in one form or another. | ||
| And the people underneath will accept that. | ||
| And that's what so much of this has to do with, honestly. | ||
| That is literally what is actually going on. | ||
| It's a spiritual battle. | ||
| But we'll move on now to some other stories. | ||
| I'll go to calls in just a second, but I really got to play this video because I hadn't heard about this, but it is apparently going true. | ||
| And again, it's just a troubling signal that we should be paying attention to amidst all the noise. | ||
| It's from Canada. | ||
| Clip number seven is a Canadian sounding the alarm that the Canadian military is now going door-to-door conducting wellness checks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Did you guys hear that the Canadian Armed Forces are doing a door-to-door wellness check exercise called Trillium Ventures? | |
| And they are going door-to-door in smaller communities in Northern Ontario, including the local police that are helping them. | ||
| And they're basically asking, how are you doing? | ||
| And are you prepared in case of a giant emergency? | ||
| They are also giving out brochures of everything that you should have in case of an emergency and to be ready because emergency preparedness starts with you. | ||
| This article from True North Wire is stating that the Canadian Armed Forces will be part of an extreme heat scenario exercise in communities throughout the Huron County, Ontario. | ||
| The exercise, called Trillium Venture, will take place from May 3rd to 5th And according to the OPP, the Ontario Police Department, press release, the purpose of the exercise is to enhance interoperability with the governmental departments as they work together to respond to a simulated extreme heat scenario. | ||
| My first question is, what is this extreme heat scenario? | ||
| Are you talking temperatures? | ||
| Or are we talking about maybe an attack or a simulated attack? | ||
| Because we all know the World Economic Forum likes to predict everything that's going to happen with a lot of accuracy for the future. | ||
| But Desi Media went up there and interviewed individual Canadian military force personnel. | ||
| And one said that this is an annual exercise that they've done almost every year. | ||
| However, when I looked into it, there was nothing online about a wellness door-to-door check being done by the police and the Canadian Armed Forces. | ||
| And I even talked to an ex-military personnel who said he's never heard of it either. | ||
| So now I'm wondering what is going on? | ||
| Could the Canadian government Be preparing us or maybe training us to see military personnel in our small towns as a normal thing for them to come door to door to ask us how we're doing. | ||
| You know, in case Justin Trudeau goes full dictatorship on us again like he did in 2020. | ||
| But let me just show you this video caught by Desi Media and then at the end of it let me know what you think or if you've Have you ever seen this in any of your towns, small towns, specifically in the north, of the military coming to your door and asking you how you're doing? | ||
| Hi, guys. Good, how are you? | ||
| You guys are part of the operation? | ||
| They're doing wellness checks? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's that? Oh, I know, I know. | |
| Yeah, cool. | ||
| Yeah, that's interesting. | ||
| That's all that they said? That scares you through? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Really? Okay. | |
| All right. We got some work coming now. | ||
| All right, guys. How are you? | ||
| Good. Good. | ||
| You guys part of the wellness check operation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah? What, what, do you mind telling us kind of what it is? | |
| Are you going door to door, or...? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so it's just the annual thing that we do. | |
| Okay. Oh, really? | ||
| Oh, it's annual? Because I never knew it was annual. | ||
| Oh, really? Oh, interesting. | ||
| Okay. Yeah, this is the first time I ever thought it was annual. | ||
| Yeah, we've been right here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, okay. Yeah, we go all over the place. | |
| Oh. Is the operation any sort of data collection that you're looking for at all? | ||
| Or is this just a knock on the door? | ||
| How's it going? We're training? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's pretty much it. That's basically it? | |
| Oh, okay. And you're the reservist unit out of London, right? | ||
| Oh, you guys came from Windsor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, you came from Windsor. Okay. | |
| Cool. All right. | ||
| All right. You guys, we're kind of doing a story ourselves, so we'll kind of be around. | ||
| Yeah? All right. | ||
| All right. Okay. Thanks. | ||
| You too. From TNC.News, CAF and Huron Police to conduct door-to-door wellness check exercise. | ||
| According to Major Paul Pickering of 31 Canadian Brigade Group, the exercise will simulate a realistic scenario that involves a 13-day heat wave with severe storm that causes power outages, damaged infrastructure in homes, as well as water shortages in some community. | ||
| They're preparing, folks. | ||
| They're training. They're going door-to-door for wellness checks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Which means you should be prepared for something entirely different than what they're claiming to be preparing for. | |
| Alright, welcome back folks. | ||
| We go directly out to your phone calls. | ||
| You see a couple names I don't recognize. | ||
| I wanna go to Rex in Virginia. | ||
| On line four, talking about a story I hadn't heard until he brought it up and the crew brought the story in here. | ||
| The headline is Coward Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Shredded for Running from Reporters When Asked About Officer Louis Huesca's Accused Killer. | ||
| Go ahead, Rex. You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I saw this. | |
| Hello, Harrison. Thanks for taking my call. | ||
| Oh, my God. He's literally running. | ||
| Is that him? Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. I thought it was, I've only seen it once, and it was on End We Know on Rumble, and I thought it was pretty relevant to what's going on. | |
| I think this is going to be happening more and more when the deep state gets exposed, and I think the heat's going to start coming down on them, and I thought this was pretty significant, and I wanted to share it. | ||
| Well, thank you for sharing that. | ||
| I had not seen this. | ||
| Chicago, Illinois, outrage ensued as Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson was captured on camera fleeing supporters who sought comments on the recent arrest of alleged cop killer. | ||
| The embarrassing incident, which took place in an alleyway after a National Day of Prayer service on Thursday, May 2nd, showed Johnson scrambling into a chauffeured SUV as journalists bombarded him with questions regarding Xavier Tate Jr.'s arrest, per the New York Post. | ||
| That is incredible. So he's literally running. | ||
| And there's video of this too. | ||
| And they're literally running. | ||
| I mean, not just walking away saying no comment, but like these guys are actually jogging to the SUV to avoid questions. | ||
| I suppose the questions have to do with the legal status of the suspect arrested. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is that correct? You know, I caught the tail end of it, but It absolutely is. | |
| Tate Jr., 22, who allegedly gunned down the police officer during a carjacking incident on April 21st, was apprehended on Wednesday in Glendale Heights, 10 days after the brutal early morning shooting that claimed the life of the six-year department veteran. | ||
| According to authorities, the off-duty officer was driving home in his uniform after completing his shift when Tate Jr. | ||
| approached the driver's side and unleashed a barrage of gunfire, striking Huesca 10 times. | ||
| He was rushed to the hospital but succumbed to his injuries. | ||
| Very, very interesting. | ||
| Mayor Brandon Johnson being asked about this, and he literally runs away. | ||
| Absolutely incredible. Yeah, people calling him a coward. | ||
| He's a public servant, and he will not answer questions. | ||
| He's a disgrace, just like every other Democrat in office. | ||
| And I know Alex covered this a little bit last week, but there has been a huge number of police shootings recently, like police officers being shot, including... | ||
| One instance where four police officers were killed and several others injured hardly even made the news. | ||
| Again, just another data point in the collapse of our society, of our civilization, as the ultimate outcome to the Black Lives Matter protest comes to fruition. | ||
| And the police are being routinely gunned down by the criminals. | ||
| They're not allowed to actually apprehend and punish. | ||
| Thank you for that, Colin. Thank you for alerting us to that story. | ||
| I had not seen that. And yet it is very, I don't know, informative. | ||
| It gives you a very good idea of where exactly we are as a country. | ||
| Let's go to another call I don't recognize. | ||
| I don't know if I've heard from Bill in Tampa, Florida before. | ||
| Let's go to Bill on Line 7. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, thanks for taking my call, Harrison. | |
| I wanted to call in today about why I think this anti-Semitism bill is actually a good thing. | ||
| Maybe I'm a little biased. | ||
| I've been listening to Alex Jones since I've been about 12 years old, so I've been read into a lot of this stuff for a while now. | ||
| I don't go to church anymore because they don't talk about any... | ||
| Drew Hernandez makes this point a lot. | ||
| Shout out to him. His show's awesome. | ||
| But he makes this point, like you said earlier, all of the stuff that's going on is pretty much spiritual and And it's just, it's crazy, but, like, it makes sense. | ||
| And the churches are totally AWOL. Yeah, they don't talk about what's going on in today's world at all. | ||
| They're happy to talk about the controversies about the Corinthian church in the first century, but when it comes to trans kids, they suddenly get very cold feet. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's pathetic, really. Yeah, they start waving the rainbow flag, and, you know, it's good to be accepting. | |
| We all gotta be accepting, uh, But, yeah, once I find a church where the pastor is actually, you know, talking about some real stuff, you know, I'll start going. | ||
| But I think if they actually pass this anti-Semitism bill and actually start going after Christians, it's going to wake a lot of people up and make them finally realize that they're actually under attack. | ||
| And even if they do start throwing people in jail for reading the Bible, it's probably going to go to the Supreme Court and get thrown out because it's totally unconstitutional. | ||
| So that's just my two cents. | ||
| Yeah, look, you know, it's not going to happen tomorrow, right? | ||
| They're not going to be arresting people for reading the Bible tomorrow, but they are setting in place the legal groundwork for that to eventually be the outcome. | ||
| And of course, you know, if you protest abortion clinics, they will throw you in jail for 10 years just for sitting on the ground outside of an abortion clinic. | ||
| So, I mean, clearly... | ||
| This stuff is coming to fruition. | ||
| It's just not going to be, you know, tomorrow that having a Bible gets you thrown in prison. | ||
| It'll be a more subtle application of this law. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, this has been the silver lining to the anti-Semitism bill is that a lot of people are waking up and going, wait, they're saying it's anti-Semitic to say the Jews killed Jesus? | ||
| It's in the Bible. | ||
| So you're saying the Bible's anti-Semitic? | ||
| That's sort of a... We're good to go. | ||
| It's been going on for years, and really the major moves have happened over the last few months. | ||
| It's time to recognize the threat that this is. | ||
| So I just hope people weren't outraged about the anti-Semitism bill and then just forgot about it and it gets passed through the Senate and it just continues on ad nauseum. | ||
| We've got to actually stand up against this and push back against it in a very real way. | ||
| And yeah, churches are sort of the biggest losers in all of this. | ||
| As in, they can't, they just refuse to stand up for Christian beliefs when they're obviously under attack in a very real way in our current society. | ||
| Thank you for that call, Bill. | ||
| Let's go to Jen in Georgia, because she also wants to talk about 6090, the anti-Semitism bill. | ||
| Go ahead, Jen, you're on the air. | ||
| Yeah, well, this is more about the bill in relation to the Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens' conflict. | ||
| I just find it very bizarre in how, because I follow Mark Dice, and he's really been exposing Ben Shapiro for who he really is. | ||
| Yeah, he's great. And I love Mark Dice. | ||
| But a few weeks ago, he was showing how on X, Candace has basically challenged Ben Shapiro to a debate on defining the term anti-Semitism. | ||
| And it's kind of weird how simultaneously it seems, like a few days ago when this bill came out and they're putting a vote on it, Ben Shapiro has, according to Mark Dice, put a gag order against Candace and told her that she's not supposed to talk about daily wire or anything anymore. | ||
| And now they're not going to do the debate. | ||
| But it almost seems as if he knew something was about to get passed. | ||
| And it's kind of crazy to me that he's using the same tactics that the Democrats have used against Alex Jones and they're using against Trump right now against one of his former colleagues. | ||
| It's BS. Yeah, it's completely hypocritical. | ||
| It's totally weaselly. | ||
| Daily Wire reportedly gets a gag order against sex host Candace Owens. | ||
| So while they're publicly challenging her to a debate, they're secretly behind the scenes issuing gag orders to prevent her from speaking out. | ||
| Total weasel activity. | ||
| And all of these old neocon Israel-first organizations are being exposed. | ||
| This is an interesting one from a few days ago. | ||
| TPUSA has a secret website throwing Candace Owens under the bus. | ||
| Turning Point USA, the right-wing youth advocacy organization founded and run by Charlie Kirk, is operating a secret website distancing itself and Kirk from Candace Owens, the controversial former employee that TPUSA continues to associate itself with despite her recent embrace of overtly anti-Semitic rhetoric. | ||
| Which is not true, but that's the way this article puts it. | ||
| The website can be found at the domain israel.tposa.com. | ||
| Its header reads, TPSA stands with Israel. | ||
| The rest of the page is dedicated to expressing Kirk and TPSA's affinity for Israel and stressing the fact that Owens does not represent either the organization or its founder. | ||
| It says, below we provide a list of articles and videos so you can fully understand Charlie's and Turning Points USA's unapologetic support of Israel and the Jewish people. | ||
| Charlie is one of the most vocal supporters of Israel in the country. | ||
| I hope these videos and links can help clear up any questions you may have. | ||
| As a reminder, Charlie is not Candace, and Candace is not a TPUSA employee. | ||
| If you have specific questions about Candace, comments, or views, we suggest you contact her directly. | ||
| They have an entire... | ||
| Secret page. They don't advertise, but you can find it if it hasn't been taken down yet. | ||
| Reassuring non-Americans that TPSA, the American organization, has their concerns first and foremost. | ||
| And they're not associated with that anti-Semite Candace Owens, who didn't do anything wrong. | ||
| I need to remind you. We'll be back on the other side with In To Thin Air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
...the fact that I'm going to lay out... | |
| So let's just go through it very quickly. | ||
| If Anthony Fauci was sitting across the table from the COVID Select Committee, a question that should be asked is, why did you authorize in vivo gain-of-function research on coronavirus at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill by Ralph Baric and his team during the gain-of-function moratorium? | ||
| And after asking that question, someone on the committee should simply put this particular letter in front of him and say, Why is it, Mr. Fauci, that on the 21st of October 2014, you decided to waive the gain-of-function that on the 21st of October 2014, you decided to waive the gain-of-function moratorium specifically for Ralph Barak's | ||
| And why specifically did you authorize the modification of that protocol, which just for the record happens to be the grant that was referenced inside of the letter itself, Why did you choose to allow this particular gain-of-function research to include work in vivo, meaning in living systems? | ||
| The reason why this is important is because Ralph Baric in his testimony and Peter Daszak in his testimony have talked about the fact that there were careless lab leaks and careless lab errors in Wuhan, but no one on the committee bothered to ask the question, what happened with the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 that Ralph Baric created in his lab in North Carolina in 2014, | ||
| 15, and 16, And published the results of manipulating it in 2016 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences under the headline, and we'll come back to this, SARS-like WIV1-CoV poised for human emergence from the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in March 15, 2016. Why, Dr. | ||
| Fauci, did you authorize the gain-of-function research on the Wuhan Institute of Virology virus in North Carolina? | ||
| And why is no one on the select committee asking any of those questions, even, by the way, to Ralph Barrett, who is the person who, in fact, not only created the weapon, but created the deployment for it, and in the fall of 2019, but created the deployment for it, and in the fall of 2019, entered into a material transfer agreement with Moderna to make sure that they had the sequence so that they could put it into A second question that you would ask Dr. | ||
| Fauci. Why did the Department of Health and Human Services transfer ownership of Ralph Baric's infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus patent from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill to the National Institutes of Health in the year preceding allegedly the pandemic? | ||
| Why was it important for the Department of Health and Human Services, NIH and NIAID, why was it important for them to take ownership Why did they need to have that patent? | ||
| What was the commercial interest in it? | ||
| And why in 2020, when the United States Congress asked for a specific accounting of the patents owned by or under the management of Department of Health and Human Services, Why was that patent never listed, | ||
| despite the fact that it is the basis for the, in fact, proof that this was a human-manipulated pathogen in 2002 using the model of coronavirus? | ||
| Three... Dr. | ||
| Fauci, why did Ralph Barrett transfer to the VRC, the Vaccine Research Center, why did Ralph Barrett transfer the COVID sequence to Moderna prior to the first patient reported in Wuhan? | ||
| So that is Dr. David Martin talking about the COVID Select Committee being used to stage a cover-up. | ||
| Because, of course, because the whole system would come down if people knew where COVID really came from and how it was released. | ||
| Stay with us into thin air on the other side. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We move on now from geopolitical concerns to geothermal. | ||
| The weather. Joining me now is Brian, a.k.a. | ||
| Into Thin Air. Brian analyzes anthropogenic and naturally occurring weather events and posts his research under the moniker Into Thin Air, and that's the number two, Into Thin Air, on X, YouTube, and other platforms. | ||
| On Rumble, he can be found at Into Thin Air in the number two, Thin Air News, on YouTube, Into Thin Air, and on X at Into Thin Air. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us today, Brian. | ||
| Thank you, Harrison. How are you, bud? | ||
| I'm good, and I'm excited to talk to you because I'm not really sure how you do what you do, and I want to hear it explained. | ||
| I first saw your work when you were the first to publicize and to show images of this bizarre Antarctic anomaly that nobody could quite make sense of. | ||
| And so I've showed your video, and I sort of interact with you on Twitter then, but then a few days later, You predicted a massive tornado swarm. | ||
| You predicted the first F5 tornado in a long time. | ||
| And two days later, your prediction became absolutely true. | ||
| So I thought, okay, I got to get this guy on and figure out how he was able to predict this and what you're using and everything. | ||
| Just tell us, what do you do? | ||
| What do you spend your time doing? | ||
| Well, I mean, I've been on YouTube a long time doing, I had a conspiracy channel years ago, got shut down, all that stuff, and then I have a lot of meteorologists in my family and stuff like that, and I almost went that route after college, and it didn't really work out. | ||
| I mean, long story short, I started doing some work with Jackass, believe it or not. | ||
| That's a whole other story. | ||
| And I ended up getting hurt, and I started, you know, I was stuck home for a while, and I started getting into hurricanes, and that was around Hurricane Harvey. | ||
| And that was one of the weirdest hurricanes, the way it acted, double landfall, all that stuff. | ||
| And that kind of opened my mind to checking out the weather. | ||
| At first, I wasn't really talking about how weather manipulation works or anything like that. | ||
| I was kind of just talking about hurricanes and how they work to, you know, give people a general idea of how that stuff works and, you know, basic things. | ||
| And it kind of picked up. | ||
| I wasn't a paid meteorologist or anything like that, so you see these things happening on radar, and you see the consequences of them, and you can't ignore it. | ||
| And I started posting on that, and it just took off from there, and it's pretty wild. | ||
| It's a popular topic online right now. | ||
| It is, and obviously things like the Antarctic Anomaly drew a lot of attention of people just going, what the heck is this? | ||
| And the official sources had announced that there were glitches in the system and all that sort of stuff, and then there was a second Antarctic Anomaly. | ||
| Can you tell us about the second, because we didn't really cover the second one. | ||
| What happened with the second Antarctic Anomaly, and what's going on here in your understanding? | ||
| So, Right, right. | ||
| So, there's actually a bunch of them, and there might be even more than we know about. | ||
| So, February was the first one. | ||
| That really didn't go viral online. | ||
| Some people picked it up. The one on April 9th, though, went super viral. | ||
| I think one of the TikToks had over 10 million views on it before the channel was shut down for some reason. | ||
| So... Ventusky comes out immediately playing damage control and they're talking about the only topic they would acknowledge is that people were calling it a USO or a UFO. Now in my research I was calling it a frequency weapon because that island between Antarctica and South Africa is known to have these anomalies coming from it. | ||
| This anomaly comes from the same spot every time there's an island right there Right. | ||
| frequency set up, almost like a harp system that most people would know about. | ||
| I don't believe it's actually harp itself, I believe it's some sort of other technology, but I believe that the program that picked it up, the only way it knew how to distribute that information was in a waves form. | ||
| So everyone thought there were these giant waves coming to all sorts of continents, and that wasn't the case at all. | ||
| It was actually the program reacting to a frequency weapon, and it had no other way to do that. | ||
| So people were asking, where are these waves coming from? | ||
| Where's the tsunamis? | ||
| There were no tsunamis. | ||
| This was... The program reacting to something that took place and then forecasting what might happen afterwards. | ||
| That's why Ventusky was able to remove the future data, but they could not remove what had already happened. | ||
| You can go back and look at all these anomalies still today. | ||
| They're still on the chart. | ||
| They only removed the future forecast of what those were. | ||
| Fascinating. So there's some sort of signal coming out and that basically gets misinterpreted by the sensors as being waves, but they are interpreting something. | ||
| They're just not interpreting waves, which, you know, obviously there weren't 80 foot tall waves crashing into the coast of Africa. | ||
| We would have seen that. Right. | ||
| You know, creating weather systems itself. | ||
| You know, we're looking a lot more into this. | ||
| We don't have, you know, the 100% factual proof. | ||
| But what we do have is things like Ventusky jumping online to play damage control, but not acknowledging the frequency part of it. | ||
| They're only talking about and laughing at the part that people are calling it a USO or a UFO. Now, that's how they're kind of like... | ||
| without acknowledging what's really going on you can see on your screen these wildfires took place right after this anomaly happened right so there have been calls and effects of this it's not a 100% science that we can just determine where this you know whether it's gonna end up or what's gonna happen after these frequencies but they're being picked up and they can't take them off the chart because it's a real thing happening and they're doing the the obvious the the classic distraction and | ||
| And they do it with us, too. We're talking about very real geopolitical movements going on and people coming together and setting policy and implementing that policy. | ||
| And then they come up and go, oh, what, you think they're all reptilians? | ||
| You think it's aliens, right? | ||
| Yes. Okay, so you're just distracting from what we're actually talking about, which is very real and serious by associating with something outlandish and insane. | ||
| So we know that's a very suspicious way to react to all of this. | ||
| I agree. Yes, to only acknowledge the USO or UFO part of it when the biggest theory that got the most attention was the frequency weapon theory. | ||
| Right. And they didn't say a word about that. | ||
| They don't mention that. And still to this day, they didn't. | ||
| I've tagged them in many posts and not a word. | ||
| Of course. Well, and there's so much going on about weather manipulation these days. | ||
| The floods in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, where they're practicing weather modification very openly, and you're seeing the effects of it. | ||
| Massive floods wiping out entire neighborhoods. | ||
| Is that a central part of your research? | ||
| And if you pay attention to this type of stuff, the weather modification going on, does that make more sense of what's going on climactically or in weather systems around the world? | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. So there are HARP systems all over the world. | ||
| The most famous one is obviously in Alaska. | ||
| Everyone knows about that. It's been on the internet forever. | ||
| A lot of what happens in the States isn't so much HARP itself. | ||
| There are HARP rings, they call them. | ||
| Those are the radar anomalies you see around the actual Nexrad towers. | ||
| But Nexrad is a separate system that works as a network all over the entire country. | ||
| So basically, they play off each other. | ||
| Which is why a storm coming in from the West, let's say, can start being manipulated even over the Pacific Ocean before it gets to the U.S. And then different towers are messing with that storm and eventually giving them the outcome they want in a lot of situations. | ||
| Sometimes they're just doing tests. | ||
| There's data beams and stuff like that. | ||
| So what we're trying to do is determine which of these beams actually cause influence in the storm and which don't. | ||
| That's a hard thing to do because all we have is simple radar, basically, to catch these things. | ||
| And when we see them, what you basically want to do is you want to watch that area and see if anything is affected, influenced. | ||
| If not, chances are it could be just a data analysis, reading the storms, speeds, all sorts of things. | ||
| But then there's times where you see these beams happen, or like you explained in the beginning, they set up an area, Right. Right. | ||
| Right. Well, just on that topic, there have been several instances of radars going down across the country recently. | ||
| I'm glad you brought that up. | ||
| Yeah, I'm sure you've noticed that. What's behind that? | ||
| Because a lot of people are asking questions, how is this happening? | ||
| How are all these radar stations going down at once? | ||
| What's behind that? So, I noticed that as well, and as I said before, the next red setup is like a network. | ||
| So, picture like a string of lights you put on your Christmas tree. | ||
| One goes out, it could affect a lot of other ones. | ||
| How they explain that is hard to understand because whatever they put out on the news, chances are that's not how it went. | ||
| Everyone jumped on the hack and things like that. | ||
| I think that's very possible. | ||
| I really do. I feel like This stuff is so in-depth now and so many countries have it that there could be weather wars going on. | ||
| There could be a battle where some of these radars are hacked and they're trying to create something or enhance something and then other radars jump in and try to stop it. | ||
| It sounds insane. It really does. | ||
| But when you start watching these things and you start seeing the patterns and how they're predicting crazy storms 10 days out, a lot of times it's very weird to do that. | ||
| And specifically with this Oklahoma situation and storms that have been going on there, this was actually promoted as like a movie a week before it happened. | ||
| You know, so they're talking about this and they have all these graphics and videos up like it's like something we're going to sit down and watch like a movie. | ||
| And you've never really seen that in weather. | ||
| You know, they kind of talk about weather as it happens. | ||
| They give you their overall predictions. | ||
| But they basically put this thing out as if it was going to be a devastating situation. | ||
| And it was. And it's going to be again today. | ||
| It's going to be again today. We'll explain that. | ||
| Yes. Well, today, well, some of the forecasts out there are calling for a very, very extreme weather situation in Oklahoma. | ||
| It's going to move into the center of the country, into Missouri, things like that. | ||
| I have a lot of posts that I'm doing on it today. | ||
| Still stuck at work for a while, but I'm going to explain that a lot more. | ||
| The whole area was already set up. | ||
| I have a video out where the The radar beams were going absolutely nuts for days. | ||
| Now that whole area is a hot spot. | ||
| So anything that moves into that area is going to outperform a lot stronger than it would have if it was just left alone and natural. | ||
| So, and again, I, you know, you could take what you do and say, oh, he's just misreading signals or whatever. | ||
| You know, you can nitpick or say, all right, blues and UFOs or whatever. | ||
| But the fact that I saw you, I saw it with my own eyes. | ||
| I saw you predict the tornado outbreak. | ||
| I saw you predict that there would be an F5 that there hadn't been in like a century or something. | ||
| And you could explain the details of that. | ||
| I know I'm just saying it vaguely here, but I saw you predict it and then I saw it come to fruition. | ||
| And that's something that you can't fake because... | ||
| You predicted it, and then it came to fruition. | ||
| How were you able to predict this? | ||
| And tell us about the F5, and I can't remember the exact dates, but it had been a long time since an F5 had manifested in this particular area, and yet you predicted that there would be one, and then there was. | ||
| How were you able to do that? Alright, well, it was a lot of different things. | ||
| One of them happened to be that the anniversary of that day happened to be an F5 tornado. | ||
| So, a lot of dates, they like to play with dates and they like to play with history and repeat history. | ||
| I know that's getting a little bit out there and not weather related, but it was based on what I was seeing happen. | ||
| And then the On top of that, after we had already seen the area getting blown up, the news started pouring in and talking about past F5s in the Moore, Oklahoma tornado from 2013. | ||
| That was like the last official F5 we've had. | ||
| And actually, this tornado that was measured as an F5 in wind speed is actually now rated an F1 because it did not cause any damage. | ||
| There are tornadoes that reach these F5 speeds, but unless they cause damage, they're not going to be ranked in history as an F5 tornado. | ||
| So that is one big thing. | ||
| And also these anti-cyclonic tornadoes that have been happening are super rare. | ||
| It's less than 2% of these even form, and one of them happened to be one of the strongest tornadoes we've ever recorded in an opposite direction. | ||
| What does that mean? | ||
| It means it's spinning in the opposite direction of where it should be in the northern hemisphere. | ||
| Interesting. Just like a hurricane. | ||
| It would be like a hurricane spinning backwards in the Atlantic Ocean. | ||
| Yeah, how does that happen? | ||
| It's basically just very rare weather patterns coming together, which I've been researching, and when you cause chaotic weather, these next red towers are causing chaotic weather, the weather doesn't know how to react, and it reacts the only way it knows how to. | ||
| And in some cases, it was the perfect conditions for these things to spin in an opposite direction. | ||
| It actually spawned off a separate tornado right next to it that was spinning in the normal direction, almost like a Fujiwara effect you'd see with hurricanes. | ||
| Where they basically play off each other and then they become not so much one big storm. | ||
| One usually overtakes the other and it continues on its path. | ||
| But this is what we're seeing now on land instead of in the ocean where it should be happening. | ||
| And so you're saying the next red towers themselves, the intended purpose is they're just weather radars, right? | ||
| Yes, that's how they were presented to us, of course. | ||
| But what are they really doing? So they have multiple uses. | ||
| It's not just for weather. | ||
| These things are tracking airplanes. | ||
| They're tracking any sort of data you can think of, the air pressure, all sorts of stuff, and then The secret, the hidden stuff within these radar is what people are trying to figure out. | ||
| It's been talked about since the 80s. | ||
| Lieutenant Colonel Thomas Bearden was very huge on this stuff. | ||
| He passed away in 2022. | ||
| Tons of videos in the 80s about the DEW weapons, directed energy weapons and things like that. | ||
| And this technology is now implemented in these NEXTRAD radars. | ||
| So we're seeing scalar beams, which are two separate radar. | ||
| For example, I have many examples of this on my channel, where they cross-section. | ||
| They cross each other, and you can see it crossed on the radar. | ||
| Within that area is a huge amount of energy, to the point where it's a pinpoint energy, or it can energize an entire area. | ||
| So when you see these beams crisscrossing in areas where there's no weather, you can almost expect that something's going to happen in that area. | ||
| We've even tied some of these to earthquakes. | ||
| It's pretty crazy. | ||
| How do earthquakes play into this? | ||
| Because I know there's the—I mean, there's a whole realm that I'm not super familiar with, but I know there's the weather and there's the earthquake guys, like Dutch Sins, but you're all sort of doing the same thing, right? | ||
| Yeah, he's incredible. Yeah, and you know, I'm glad you brought that up because there's so many people out there that have put so much time and years into these studies and have been censored and harassed over this stuff. | ||
| And I'm lucky, you know, to have an opportunity to speak with you about it. | ||
| But yeah, Dutch Sense, Just Ashton, talking about MH370, incredible researcher. | ||
| These people deserve a lot of attention for what they're doing and studying because, you know, a lot of these people, their lives are being messed with in many ways. | ||
| And it's sad because all they're doing is trying to get information out to people. | ||
| And it's almost like, you know... | ||
| With X these days and the thing going on with TikTok, you know, X is very good with the free speech thing, but still earthquakes and stuff like that are heavily censored. | ||
| And it's very weird how we can talk about anything, but you talk about earthquake forecasting and it's done. | ||
| The conversation's over according to X and the community notes. | ||
| Right. Well, the official story is you cannot predict earthquakes, so it sort of contradicts that when people are. | ||
| I mean, that's a whole other story. | ||
| In fact, if you want the best person to speak to on that would be Dutch Sense, because he could break down the science in a way that I would never be able to. | ||
| I'm very good at noticing patterns and things like that, so... | ||
| When I see these anomalies happen, sometimes they're nothing. | ||
| You can't go on a radar and be like, okay, there's a beam. | ||
| This means something bad is going to happen or they're messing with something. | ||
| That's not true. It's a lot of research. | ||
| A lot of time is a lot of just watching boring radar. | ||
| But when you see these things and you put them on the internet and people start throwing in different information, it's hard to deny what you're seeing. | ||
| These things are being... These storms are being clearly influenced by radar. | ||
| They're picking and choosing which areas are getting the worst of the weather. | ||
| And of course, a paid meteorologist on TV and stuff like that, they're not going to come out and talk about this stuff. | ||
| They're not going to say anything about it. | ||
| I wouldn't be surprised if there's actual gag orders involved when it comes to big meteorologists and things like that. | ||
| So I'm not trying to go out there and attack meteorologists for not talking about this stuff. | ||
| I have done it at times and tried to get my point across, but this is mostly for people trying to learn about this stuff, and it's real. | ||
| It's a very real thing, and I think sooner than later it's going to be known that it's real because... | ||
| The thing in Dubai, I believe that was an accident. | ||
| I don't think they meant for that to happen, or if they did, they're explaining it away with cloud seeding. | ||
| Now they've opened a can of worms by admitting cloud seeding, even though it's been known forever, but unless it's shown on the TV, Fox News, CNN, to the masses, they're not going to believe it. | ||
| So now that that's out there, cloud seeding is open, and now that's all people are talking about. | ||
| Cloud seeding is a part of this, but it's... | ||
| It's cloud seeding with the radar to activate what's in the cloud seeding. | ||
| It's all a big system. It's all a big network, Nexrad, and the cloud seeding is all involved with each other. | ||
| Well, and this is the interesting thing. | ||
| I mean, the same thing with the DEWs that you brought up, the direct energy weapons. | ||
| If we talk about it, they're like, oh, these crazy people, what Jewish space lasers? | ||
| Yeah, right. And then you go to, you know, we played last week an announcement from the Pentagon saying, yes, Russia and China are developing killer satellites with directed energy weapons on board. | ||
| And it's like... So, we're not the ones saying this. | ||
| They are. We're just reporting it to you, and then they call us crazy. | ||
| Same thing with the weather control. | ||
| If you say, yeah, they're controlling the weather, well, you're a tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist until suddenly, you know, there's a giant flood in Dubai, and it's like, well, this is because of all the weather modification that we're doing, and it's all just very casual and normal and don't look too much into it. | ||
| But, I mean, how big of a deal is this? | ||
| The chemtrails, the HAARP, the radar arrays, the cloud seeding. | ||
| I mean, to what... | ||
| To what scale is this happening? | ||
| Because it seems like it's huge. | ||
| And once it gets to a certain point, is any of our weather natural? | ||
| Is it all being affected by this stuff? | ||
| I mean, how big is this operation? | ||
| It's global. It is 100% global. | ||
| And, you know, that's the thing. | ||
| I mean, one of the most famous quotes ever is, if you can control the weather, you can control history or control the world. | ||
| And it's true. You know, weather is the most determining factor in our lives every day. | ||
| You know, I mean, I guess the only way to avoid weather would be to go underground. | ||
| And, again, that's a whole other story. | ||
| I'm sure that is being prepared for as well. | ||
| But, yes... You know, there's so many directions this could go. | ||
| I mean, imagine it this way. | ||
| It's not just one group of people that run this entire weather system. | ||
| It's different groups battling for who's in charge. | ||
| So these weather wars are not out of the realm of possibility. | ||
| This could be something as crazy as two different groups battling each other to see who's got the better technology for this stuff. | ||
| I'm not trying to get off into this conspiratorial thing where everyone's just like, oh, I don't want to learn about this. | ||
| I would focus on these radar and what's going on in real time because the hurricane season itself is going to be terrible. | ||
| All the conditions for it are in place and ready to go. | ||
| So if everything were to happen, naturally, it would be a busy season. | ||
| But I believe it's going to be enhanced just like this situation with tornado seasons being enhanced because there's an agenda out there about climate change. | ||
| So this makes perfect sense to fit in there and push that agenda in ways where people can't really question it. | ||
| And if they do, you're made to look crazy and stuff like that. | ||
| That's typical for this type of work. | ||
| If you're concerned about climate change, probably the thing you should be most concerned about is the fact that they're making it rain in Dubai at 110 degrees, you know, heat. | ||
| It's like, if you're actually concerned about human effects of climate change, probably the number one thing you should be concerned about are the programs being run by humans to affect the climate change. | ||
| Yeah, Harrison, you're absolutely right. | ||
| And the thing that's so frustrating is that the information has been out there since before the 80s. | ||
| I mean, Vietnam was a huge weather manipulation operation on top of the war. | ||
| I mean, that's something you can look into. | ||
| You could do 10 shows on that and still not cover everything that happened there. | ||
| So, this has been going on for a long time. | ||
| The information's been out there. | ||
| In fact, we have a agreement, a legit agreement with Canada, that we have to share weather manipulation projects with each other. | ||
| I think it's within 200 kilometers of the border. | ||
| So, these things are in place. | ||
| They've been in place. And, you know, people deny all the evidence just because, you know, they're, you know... | ||
| A favorite meteorologist on YouTube says that it's not real. | ||
| Right. Well, I mean, honestly— The internet's very influential. | ||
| It sucks. Sort of the worst part about it is I walk outside, and instead of thinking, ah, it's a nice sunny day today, I find myself thinking, like, oh, the overlords have allowed us to have a nice day. | ||
| When are they going to ruin it? Right. | ||
| You think the weather is something that's just God's work on Earth, but then you learn, like, oh, no, it's all being manipulated. | ||
| Right. It's a very disturbing thought. | ||
| Well, I want to thank you for everything that you do. | ||
| You do a great job, again, on Rumble at Into Thin Air News, on YouTube and X at Into, the number two, Thin Air. | ||
| Into Thin Air, Brian Smith, thank you so much for coming on with us. | ||
| And keep up the great work. | ||
| And I'm going to keep an eye on your predictions because they've been accurate so far. | ||
| Harris, I really appreciate it, man. | ||
| I'll be much more prepared next time. | ||
| I'm very honored that you had me on here. | ||
| I appreciate it. That was great, but we'll keep an eye on your work and would love to have you on again soon. | ||
| And I hope you're wrong about tornadoes today because they are devastating. | ||
| Thank you for joining us in too thin air. | ||
| Thank you, guys. Appreciate it. Thank you so much. | ||
| Brilliant work. We'll be right back, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| We still have lots more to talk about in today's episode. | ||
| Including a couple of fascinating things going on around the country. | ||
| Around the world, really. | ||
| There's a massive... | ||
| Anti-immigration rally going on in Dublin right now. | ||
| It's a pretty astonishing footage coming out of that. | ||
| I guess there's a dueling, a pair of dueling protests. | ||
| One is the pro-immigrant side and barely anyone's there. | ||
| The other side is the anti-immigrant, the pro-nationalist, pro-Irish side. | ||
| And it is... | ||
| It's overwhelming the numbers and energy that are coming out. | ||
| Ireland could be the place that saves the West, to be honest with you. | ||
| And it's pretty incredible to see what's happening there. | ||
| So we'll return to that in just a moment. | ||
| But I want to go now to a very interesting political circumstance. | ||
| Kristi Noem came out with a book, and that turned out to be a terrible idea. | ||
| Terrible idea. She talked about killing a dog. | ||
| That was a big catastrophe over the last several weeks. | ||
| I haven't even looked into it, so I don't even have a statement on that. | ||
| I think... Just going off the basis of what I know, and if you don't know, apparently Christy Noem wrote a book about her life, and in it she wrote that she killed a dog at one point. | ||
| Now, apparently this dog was... | ||
| I mean, she lives on a farm, and this dog was, like, killing other farm animals, so they had to put the dog down. | ||
| But the way she described it, she sort of... | ||
| She has the... | ||
| I've totally blinked. | ||
| Who was the woman that was going to run for president against Trump? | ||
| Nikki Haley. I can't even remember her name. | ||
| I was thinking about this this morning and I was like, who was that lady again? | ||
| How unimportant she turns out to be. | ||
| But we talked about Nikki Haley and it's sort of a perennial issue with women candidates. | ||
| It's not that as women they're somehow incapable of doing the same thing men are doing. | ||
| It's that they feel the need to overcompensate. | ||
| And they say things that men would never say because they think it makes them more manly or something. | ||
| Where they're just like, they'll say things that are just like, oh my god, what are you talking? | ||
| They're just like, we will go in and we'll bomb them to smithereens. | ||
| It's like, Jesus, lady. What the hell? | ||
| And you can tell. It's like this overcompensation where they're like, they think women can't handle conflict. | ||
| Well, I'll show them how I can handle conflict. | ||
| And it's like, okay, lady, calm down. | ||
| This is too much. I think there's some aspect of that with Christy Noem, too. | ||
| Where it's like, I'll show that I'm not just some womanly faint at the sight of blood. | ||
| I killed a dog! And it's like, oh my god. | ||
| That's not... We're not impressed by that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's horrible. That sounds horrible. | |
| But then again, if you're on a farm, I mean... | ||
| That's what farms do. | ||
| They raise animals to kill them. | ||
| I mean, that's the point of it. | ||
| You've got all these left-wing socialites reading this, just, oh my god, that's so horrible. | ||
| It's like, well, you've just never worked a day in your life. | ||
| You just have never been to a farm before, so you have an outsized sense of importance for the lives of farm animals. | ||
| You don't understand the reality of where the chicken on your plate came from. | ||
| All that to say that this controversy about the killing of the dog has been subsumed, has been taken over by another controversy where she seemingly doesn't recognize stories told in her own book. | ||
| And this is very embarrassing. | ||
| We'll try to illustrate what may have actually happened here on the other side. | ||
| Let's go first to clip number 13. | ||
| Here's Chrissy Noem being asked about a part of her book where she discusses meeting Kim Jong-un. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Talk about meeting some world leaders and one specific one. | |
| Quote, I remember when I met with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un. | ||
| I'm sure he underestimated me having no clue about my experience staring down little tyrants. | ||
| I've been a children's pastor after all. | ||
| Did you meet Kim Jong-un? | ||
| Well, you know, as soon as this was brought to my attention, I certainly made some changes and looked at this passage. | ||
| And I've met with many, many world leaders. | ||
| I've traveled around the world. | ||
| As soon as it was brought to my attention, we went forward and have made some edits. | ||
| So I'm glad that this book is being released in a couple of days and that those edits will be in place and that people will have the updated version. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So you did not meet with Kim Jong-un? | |
| That's what you're saying? I've met with many, many world leaders. | ||
| Many world leaders. I've traveled around the world. | ||
| I think I've talked extensively in this book about my time serving in Congress, my time as governor, before governor, some of the travels that I've had. | ||
| I'm not going to talk about my specific meetings with world leaders. | ||
| I'm just not going to do that. | ||
| This anecdote shouldn't have been in the book, and as soon as it was brought to my attention, I made sure that that was adjusted. | ||
| Oof. Oof is all I have to say to that. | ||
| Yeah, I mean... | ||
| What are you going to say? | ||
| I mean, that was the most sort of politician response she could have had. | ||
| But it just made no sense on the face of it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean... | |
| If I write a story... | ||
| Where I talk about a time that I went to Burger King, but I've never actually been to Burger King. | ||
| Someone says, wait, so have you ever actually been to a Burger King? | ||
| And I go, well, I've been to lots of fast food restaurants. | ||
| I've been to all sorts. I've been to all sorts of places that serve burgers. | ||
| Don't worry about it. It's like, that's not, it's just not at all what we asked you. | ||
| We asked you about a specific thing that you wrote a book about, that you wrote into your book as a story that you told. | ||
| Did that ever happen? | ||
| Well, lots of things have happened. | ||
| I mean, I'm not going to talk about specifics, but certainly I've met with people before. | ||
| Just flailing, just flailing and embarrassing from Christy Noem. | ||
| Shout out to NuanceBro on Twitter because he thinks he discovered what might have happened. | ||
| Maybe something similar to Nathan4U. | ||
| Nathan Felder, I think is his name. | ||
| Hilarious comedian who puts people in positions where they feel as though they have to go along with his harebrained schemes. | ||
| And it's one of the best shows of all time, in my opinion, Nathan, for you. | ||
| Here's what it may have looked like with Kristi Noem and her publisher before putting out this book. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Just so you know, too, I gave them this book that I had ghostwritten about your life. | |
| Okay. Obviously, the author didn't know anything about you, so he kind of made some stuff up. | ||
| Okay. It seems like a big part of it is how you were childhood friends with Steve Jobs. | ||
| So, do you know Steve Jobs? | ||
| Steve Jobs, yes. | ||
| He's the Microsoft... | ||
| Apple. Apple, right. | ||
| Yeah. So anyways, yeah, you might want to read it over to get a sense of what your life is like before tomorrow. | ||
| Okay. In the later chapters, it actually says you spend a lot of time volunteering with jungle children. | ||
| I don't know what that is, but you might want to bring it up because audiences love someone who gives back and is charitable. | ||
| Okay. I'll tell them, you know, what they want to hear. | ||
| Jungle children. | ||
| That may be what it's like. | ||
| All right, Christy, here's what you need to know. | ||
| You kill dogs, and he wants to talk down to Kim Jong-un. | ||
| None of these things happen, so brush up. | ||
| Brush up on the book about your life before you're confronted with these embarrassingly false tales of your life. | ||
| Just embarrassing. | ||
| It really is. I'm embarrassed for her. | ||
| But we'll move on. It's just the dishonesty of politicians, the dishonesty of politics in general. | ||
| It's just abhorrent. | ||
| It's just these people are entirely fake. | ||
| And that more and more is just what's becoming obvious to all of us. | ||
| And maybe this is like the one thing that you need to understand to figure out everything that we talk about. | ||
| The rulers of our world are not the politicians and the politicians are actors. | ||
| It is as simple as that. | ||
| I know it's cliche at this point. | ||
| People still don't get it. | ||
| They haven't really internalized what this means. | ||
| The people that are setting policy in our country and abroad are the bankers, the shadow elite, the spies, the intelligence operatives, the think tanks. | ||
| You don't vote for them. | ||
| And they have way more power than everybody in the governments combined. | ||
| And then the people in government are just fake actors. | ||
| They're just there to entertain you while the people who are really in charge manipulate things and pull strings in the background. | ||
| And I think the facade is crumbling. | ||
| I think that's what's happening. I think that's failing. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Final segment of the American Journal for this Monday broadcast... | ||
| There's an interesting thing happening around the United States right now. | ||
| And it takes me back to my old libertarian days. | ||
| I'm still libertarian, but I mean, before I worked at Infowars, long before. | ||
| And I'd go to some of these meetings about things like Texas secession. | ||
| And one of the interesting speeches that was given at one of these meetings was about the multiple levels of secession. | ||
| When we think of secession, we think of a state leaving the union. | ||
| That's sort of our conception of it. | ||
| But that you can secede on an individual level. | ||
| You can separate yourself from everybody and go be totally self-sufficient in the woods. | ||
| You can have countries secede from international unions, states seceding from nations, cities seceding from states. | ||
| And we're seeing that and have seen that for the last couple years in places like Oregon, where the eastern half of Oregon wants to leave and go join Idaho. | ||
| That's a form of state secession. | ||
| Something like California, where people in California want to separate from the rest of California, have two states instead of one. | ||
| That's a form of secession. | ||
| But now it's happening on a local level with neighborhoods seceding from cities. | ||
| The one that got a lot of headlines was in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where sort of the wealthiest neighborhood of the city didn't like all of their money being taken and given to people that don't produce anything in Baton Rouge. | ||
| So they voted to leave. | ||
| And the leadership of Baton Rouge was very angry about this because they aren't going to be able to siphon their money out anymore. | ||
| They're saying, this is horrible. The city's losing $50 million. | ||
| It's like, well, that was never your money in the first place. | ||
| And they're essentially just mad that these people are saying, yeah, you can't take our money and not give us anything anymore. | ||
| You can't just use us as a tax farm to pay for your projects in the inner city that don't benefit anybody. | ||
| So people were very mad that this neighborhood of Baton Rouge decided to leave the city. | ||
| Well, it's happened in Austin as well, and it's happening around the country. | ||
| And people are thrilled about this. | ||
| The numbers of people voting for what they call disannexation, which is another way of saying secession, is overwhelming. | ||
| Lost Creek and two other areas of Austin vote to remove themselves from city limits. | ||
| Residents in six neighborhoods on the outskirts of Austin voted on whether to remove themselves from the city limits in the May 4th election. | ||
| Three of these six neighborhoods near the outskirts of Austin will be removed or disannexed from the city limits following voter approval in Saturday's election. | ||
| Disannexing from the city could mean those areas no longer receive certain services like fire and police protection. | ||
| Those services would be provided by the county. | ||
| And of course, they can just incorporate themselves into a city and provide it for themselves. | ||
| Unofficial, but results show that 91.29% of Lost Creek residents voted in favor of Proposition A to disannex from the city. | ||
| 91% voting to get away from the city of Austin. | ||
| God bless them. Good riddance, I say. | ||
| I hope my neighborhood can join you. | ||
| In dis-annexing ourselves from the administration of failure and incompetence that the city of Austin is. | ||
| I'm not sure exactly what this portends for the course of our nation as a whole. | ||
| But I think overall, at least in the short term, this is a positive thing. | ||
| This is a good thing. This is a way to bring some of these cities to heal, really. | ||
| When you have these cities that rely on gouging through taxes, you know, whole populations and then using that money to progress ridiculous socialist leftist boondoggles. | ||
| I think it's a wonderful solution. | ||
| It's just going, you know what, we don't want to be a part of your city anymore. | ||
| What's the benefit? I mean, it's the same argument you make for Texas secession, right? | ||
| What is the benefit of being part of the federal government? | ||
| So they can take our money and fund our own invasion? | ||
| Why are we a part of this? | ||
| Why are we in this little agreement? | ||
| Why are we in this partnership? | ||
| To be exploited? We don't get any benefits. | ||
| We get nothing but abuse. | ||
| So why should we participate in this? | ||
| And why can't secessionist drives on the national level be treated with the same I mean, the city of Austin is not about to go to war with Lost Creek, right? | ||
| Baton Rouge is not about to go to war with its neighborhood. | ||
| It's just a simple political reorganization. | ||
| You know what? We don't need your city government. | ||
| We don't need your city council. | ||
| We don't need you robbing us blind to pay for your open-air drug markets. | ||
| We're just going to separate ourselves from it. | ||
| And the city might be mad at that. | ||
| They might be angry that they can't fund their ridiculous programs, but too bad. | ||
| We're leaving. Not going anywhere physically. | ||
| We're just not paying you taxes anymore. | ||
| We're going to pay them to the county and we'll be fine. | ||
| We'll have better schools at the end of the day. | ||
| We'll have better police and better fire departments. | ||
| Our police will actually be able to focus on us rather than the crime that you seem desperate to foster and create everywhere else. | ||
| So why can't this same thing happen on the national level? | ||
| If a neighborhood says we don't want to be a part of Austin anymore and they leave... | ||
| Good riddance. Farewell. | ||
| But if Texas tries to leave the federal United States with the exact same arguments, it's, you know, bombers in the air the next day. | ||
| But I really am happy to see this local secession taking place across the country, specifically here in Austin. | ||
| I think it only makes sense that neighborhoods who don't benefit from being a part of the city disannex themselves or secede. | ||
| Now, this vote was spurred by a House bill passed last year. | ||
| The law requires the state's largest cities to allow some neighborhoods to vote on whether to leave the city limits. | ||
| The areas must have been annexed between March 5, 2015 and December 1, 2017. | ||
| That's when a handful of places were annexed just before the law passed that could have stopped them. | ||
| I think it's great. I think it's a wonderful thing that's happening. | ||
| Speaking of wonderful things happening, Ireland is staging a massive anti-globalist, anti-immigration protest right now. | ||
| And thank God. | ||
| Thank God they are. | ||
| Thank God the Irish are not yet browbeaten and shamed and bastardized, I guess would be a way to put it, demoralized. | ||
| It's really the function of how this works in other countries. | ||
| UK, Germany, they've been so demoralized, they legitimately do not feel like their country is worth saving. | ||
| So they do nothing to save it as it's overtaken by Muslims or just immigrants in general. | ||
| I have a lot of clips about this too. | ||
| Clip number four is an elected official in the UK shouting Allah Akbar and going on about a foreign conflict in his former home. | ||
| Go ahead and roll clip four here. | ||
| So this guy is now an elected representative of the United Kingdom. | ||
| That's what happens. You bring in a population of foreign peoples. | ||
| They vote for their own representation. | ||
| You have now been taken over. | ||
| You have now been conquered. | ||
| There's lots of videos from this weekend, the same type of thing. | ||
| A British Islamic scholar, Shadri, calls for implementation of Islamic Sharia law. | ||
| We don't have time to get to that video, but this is just happening. | ||
| UK is just being taken over outright at this point. | ||
| And Sharia law might actually not be, you know, too far down the road. | ||
| In certain neighborhoods, at least. | ||
| Victorious Leeds Green Party counselor shouts Allah Akbar after a win for Gaza. | ||
| It's pathetic and sad to see the way the UK has gone. | ||
| Thank God the Irish are seemingly avoiding that pitiful fate. | ||
| And it only makes sense. | ||
| I mean, the Irish have been colonized for basically their entire existence. | ||
| It was not very long ago. | ||
| In like the 70s, there were car bombs going off in opposition to English rule in Northern Ireland. | ||
| Catholics and Protestants at each other's throats for centuries. | ||
| And then they're just going to give that up and let a bunch of Africans in dinghies take over. | ||
| It's wonderful to see Ireland stand up and there are massive crowds... | ||
| We can go to my screen here for the last couple seconds of the show just to show you what is unfolding now in Dublin. | ||
| Huge crowds gathered in Dublin today to protest the government's mass immigration policies. | ||
| And you see just this huge crowd waving Irish flags. | ||
| That poster's from Keith Woods, from Niall O'Hara. | ||
| So it begins, massive numbers, and it's not even 2.30 yet. | ||
| This was a couple hours ago, but already the crowds were growing. | ||
| Massive pro-Irish protests descend on Dublin against mass immigration. | ||
| So the Irish are standing up against the traitors in their government who are selling out their birthright underneath them. | ||
| And all I can pray is that this nationalist sentiment, this anti-immigrant, anti-globalist, anti-New World Order sentiment starts a fire that burns through all of Europe and saves that great continent. | ||
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
| Infowars.com forward slash show. | ||
| We'll take some brain force and then we'll do this commercial. | ||
| How about that? Mmm, I can think again. | ||
| This is the liquid tincture version of Brain Force, which means you can really tailor it to exactly what you need. | ||
| I tend to take maybe a little bit more than is directed, but it's incredibly powerful stuff, and I have an incredibly demanding job. | ||
| But you make it easy by going to Infowarsstore.com, and of course Infowarsstore.com makes it easy. | ||
| By supplying me with Brain Force Ultra, I rely on this product to do my job on a daily basis because it's absolutely jam-packed with incredible ingredients. | ||
| Brain Force Ultra is now back in stock at Infowarsstore.com and get it now because this stuff sells out fast for very good reason. | ||
| It's a fantastic supplement. | ||
| It's the type of supplement that once you start taking it, well, you're going to notice if you stop. | ||
| Go check out what's in Brain Force Ultra. | ||
| Do your own research and what you'll find is that this is a powerhouse formula for incredible mental clarity, focus, and energy. | ||
| Now on sale at Infowarsstore.com. |
Export Selection