Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
*Squeak* | |
- Up, up, with liberation! - Yeah! | ||
- Go, go, go! - It hurts me! - Ow! - Ow! - Ow! - Ow! - Ow! - What would you say is the main goal of tonight's, uh, protest? go! - It hurts me! - Ow! - Ow! - What would you say is the main goal with tonight's, uh, protest? | ||
I think the goal is just showing our support for Palestine and demanding that NYU stops. | ||
I honestly don't know all of what NYU's doing. | ||
It's a clash of civilizations going on. | ||
unidentified
|
We demand a free Palestine from the river to the sea! | |
And that we stand with the Palestinian resistance and their heroic and brave action on October 7th! | ||
And they said, long live October 7th! | ||
You can have a tribal war going on, and both sides can be wrong. | ||
That's more common than one side being good, one side being bad. | ||
But it's an existential crisis, and it's admitted that George Soros and the State Department A lot of groups like George Soros' Open Society Foundations and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund are giving donations through something called a fiscal sponsor, | ||
unidentified
|
which is a non-profit organization that then disburses funds to other groups. | |
And this is how some of the groups like Students for Justice in Palestine and other groups are getting money. | ||
The big funders like the Soros Foundations and the Rockefeller Brothers Foundations are sending money through various different levels of non-profits. | ||
So that when you go back to try to find who is the original donor, you have to do a lot of work. | ||
I think of Yuri Bezmenov, the famous on-record high-level KGB defector. | ||
unidentified
|
When the Soviets use the phrase ideological subversion, what do they mean by it? | |
What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, No one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. | ||
You look at the modern one, oh, it's way more sophisticated and more fancy. | ||
unidentified
|
Joining us is Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld. | |
She's author of the book, The Soros Agenda. | ||
She's also the founder and president of the American Center for Democracy and the Economic Warfare Institute. | ||
Well, George Soros has been funding for decades. | ||
Directly and indirectly. | ||
Quite a bit of money through the Tides Foundation in San Francisco or Hamas organizations even affiliated with Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad. | ||
After October 7, the Soros organizations through Tides and also directly have been funding groups that are organizing the demonstrations now. | ||
He has been funding Rashida Khalid, actually. | ||
He's an honorary graduate of Soros Grants. | ||
There is an organization in San Francisco that he funds which actually works With high schools throughout the country, not only funding and calling for the demonstrations, but also having instructions, | ||
giving instructions to high school students what to chant and what to yell during the demonstration and what would be their talking points in order to counter anybody who criticizes Hamas. | ||
We must have revolution so we can have a socialist reconstruction of the United States of America. | ||
But if you're aware of all these tactics and see it and warn others and don't comply and are a light in the darkness people will listen to you and we will exponentially refuse this system and reject this system. | ||
Share that link we'll be right back. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to the American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
unidentified
|
A lot to talk about today. | |
The protests in college campuses around the country only get more intense as they're cracked down on. | ||
Something we could have, by which I mean did predict, last week when they first started sending phalanxes of stormtroopers to crack down on the college kids holding signs. | ||
It was inevitable. It was inevitable. | ||
It's annoying. | ||
It's just all very annoying, folks. | ||
Sitting here watching legitimate concerns be co-opted and subverted by radical socialists. | ||
Watching the conservatives just step right in their own way. | ||
Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. | ||
Now you have a massive divide in the Democratic Party, now wholly done away with, with conservatives stepping in to play the bad guys. | ||
And seemingly the only way that they're willing to interact with the American people, fulfilling all of the worst stereotypes of the conservative party. | ||
It's something to behold. | ||
We'll get into that. We do have some good news to get to today. | ||
In the case of George Allen Kelly, the rancher in Arizona, charged with murder for defending himself from illegal immigrants continually passing through his property. | ||
We really have a lot to get to today, so we'll get to all of it, hopefully, and your calls as well. | ||
But let's begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch. | ||
All right. | ||
Here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 30th of April 2024. | ||
Pro-Palestinian protesters take over Columbia University building. | ||
U.N. Rights Chief troubled by law enforcement crackdown on campus demonstrations as dozens more are arrested in Texas, Utah and Virginia. | ||
Dozens of protesters have taken over a building at Columbia University in New York, barricading the entrances and unfurling a Palestinian flag out of a window. | ||
As the U.N. Human Rights Chief says, he was troubled by how law enforcement has dealt with this recent wave of campus demonstrations. | ||
by how law enforcement has dealt with this recent wave of campus demonstrations. | ||
In the latest escalation of unrest on U.S. campuses against the Israel-Hamas war, video footage showed protesters on Columbia's Manhattan campus locking arms in front of Hamilton Hall early on Tuesday and carrying furniture and metal barricades to the building, one of several that was occupied during a 1968 civil rights and one of several that was occupied during a 1968 civil rights and anti-Vietnam War protest on Posts on an Instagram page for protest organizers shortly after midnight urged people to protect the encampment and join them in Hamilton Hall. | ||
Again, we'll get into this. | ||
We'll show you videos from all over the country, including Virginia, New York, here in Austin as well. | ||
We'll show you what the protesters are up to and what the reaction has been. | ||
And it's all combining, conspiring, coagulating together to just devolve, like every leftist protest does, into politics. | ||
Basic communism. It really is something to behold, and we'll get into that. | ||
Of course, this would be a major political opportunity for the Republicans if they were to actually uphold what they claim to believe about free speech. | ||
They could actually maybe win some converts from Democrats who perhaps for the first time might be realizing the danger of having a censorious and heavy-handed authoritarian government since previously everything they've put forward, everything the protesters have put forward in terms of Black Lives Matter and all the various other uprisings we've gone through over the last few years. | ||
They've been allowed to do this, and it's been perfectly in line with what the establishment wants, and there's never been an attempt to stop them. | ||
But perhaps now that they're actually on the receiving end of the censorship and the brutality that they encourage on others, maybe this would be a chance for an awakening where they could say, you know, gee, all that free speech stuff the conservatives are harping on about, maybe it actually is important. | ||
When the Republicans are constantly lecturing us about the value of free speech and the danger of censorship and government authorities dictating what you can and can't protest, hey, maybe that's actually not a good thing for this country. | ||
A moment of awakening was there in the potential, but it's been eradicated by the Republicans just being blatant, horrible hypocrites and not actually believing in free speech. | ||
So a political opportunity squandered by the Republicans in a way that really only they can. | ||
So of course, instead of having a Democratic Party divided and struggling to determine which side they land on, you sacrifice half your... | ||
Audience and followers for this cause or do you sacrifice for this cause? | ||
Instead of putting them in this situation or taking advantage of their split ranks, instead conservatives step in to give them a boogeyman, to give them a big bad guy, to all gather around hating. | ||
And so now the... | ||
Democrats are taking advantage of this, and the U.S. now accuses Israeli army units of human rights violations. | ||
Pandering to their base, of course, the U.S. government has determined that at least five Israeli units committed gross violations of human rights prior to the latest war with Hamas, but Washington has no plans to impose sanctions or restrict military aid to West Jerusalem. | ||
Monday's announcement marks the first time Washington has leveled such accusations against Israeli troops. | ||
All the allegations stem from incidents that occurred in the West Bank long before the Israel-Hamas war began last October. | ||
All the accused Israeli units remain eligible for American aid, despite a law prohibiting the U.S. from providing weapons or other assistance to groups that are found to have committed human rights violations with impunity. | ||
So that's nice. That's nice. | ||
The American government coming out to say, yes, they are committing war crimes. | ||
Yes, they're doing it with money we give them. | ||
No, we're not going to stop sending money or do anything else about it. | ||
So great. So great. | ||
So I guess that's just an announcement that yes, we are funding the war crimes and it will continue. | ||
Fantastic. Meanwhile, Donald Trump's hush money trial is set to resume today as prosecutors continue to keep their plans secret. | ||
Former President Donald Trump returns to the courtroom following a break at his trial for allegedly covering up hush money payments at Manhattan Criminal Court in New York City. | ||
The third week of the Donald Trump criminal hush money business fraud trial will resume Tuesday with the Manhattan District Attorney's Office continuing to be secretive about its plan of attack. | ||
Prosecutors are expected to pick up questioning of Michael Cohen's former banker Tuesday morning. | ||
It's unclear what other witnesses will take the stand. | ||
Prosecutors have been tight-lipped on their witness order, blaming Trump for his unpredictable public comments. | ||
In court, they said they would not give Trump's legal team much in an effort to avoid subjecting witnesses to Trump's social media wrath before they take the stand. | ||
So we'll check in on that. | ||
We'll see what exactly is unfolding there in the courtroom. | ||
Cohen's former banker is expected to retake the stand. | ||
In this just utterly fraudulent trial, show trial that we all have to pretend is legitimate. | ||
Meanwhile, in reality, U.S. small business rent delinquencies rise to a three-year high. | ||
This from Bloomberg. Small business rent reports from Alignable, which provides an online networking platform for owners, found 43% of small businesses were unable to pay their rent in full due to economic headwinds. | ||
That's the highest rent delinquency rate since March 2021. | ||
2021 smack dab in the heart of the COVID pandemic. | ||
We'll return to economics in just a minute. | ||
It's a very big topic of today's discussion. | ||
But finally, we end the Daily Dispatch on a good note, on a positive note. | ||
Peace of good news. | ||
Arizona rancher accused of fatal shooting will not be retried, prosecutors say. | ||
Prosecutors said Monday they will not retry an Arizona rancher whose trial in the fatal shooting of a Mexican man on his property ended last week with a deadlocked jury. | ||
The jurors in the trial of George Allen Kelly were unable to reach a unanimous decision on a verdict after more than two days of deliberation. | ||
Santa Cruz County Superior Court Judge Thomas Fink declared a mistrial On April 22nd, after the mistrial of the Santa Cruz County Attorney's Office had the option to retry Kelly or drop the case and they've decided to drop the case so george allen kelly the rancher accused of killing an illegal migrant on his land has been cleared of the charges and will not face a retrial thank god and this is actually footage of him leaving the courtroom if we want to back it up we'll go ahead and play this with the audio as the person filming asks him a few questions and get some answers in return here is george allen kelly that rancher in arizona Walking out of the courtroom for hopefully the last time after this ridiculous trial has finally come to a satisfying end. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Hi, Mr. | |
Kelly, Adam from Kagan. You looked really relieved when the state said that they were going to be dropping the case. | ||
Oh, excuse me. When they said they were going to be dropping the case, just what was your reaction when they said that? | ||
You hit a nail on the head, really. | ||
Thank God. What has this weekend been like waiting for this? | ||
They have my sympathy, my sincere sympathy. | ||
Do you worry about the next few months or years where you live, people showing up or anything like that with people protesting like this behind you? | ||
God will look after me. | ||
Like he always says. | ||
I speak with the TMS family and they think that is not justice. | ||
There you go. The nightmare is over, says George Allen Kelly. | ||
Thank goodness. Of course, it's so strange to see protesters there actually protesting this outcome. | ||
Protesting on behalf of the illegal migrant criminals. | ||
Constantly trespassing and threatening George Allen Kelly. | ||
It really is amazing what protesters will get behind these days. | ||
So that's your Daily Dispatch, brought to you of course by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Nitric Boost is back in stock and 40% off. | ||
Incredible supplement. You gotta take a look into what this does. | ||
Cardiovascular health. | ||
Really just of the best type. | ||
I can't remember the exact term that's used. | ||
I don't have a bottle here in front of me. | ||
You've got to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Just check out Nitric Boost. There's information about all the supplements there. | ||
Vasodilation is the word I was trying to think of. | ||
Vasodilation is what it helps with. | ||
In other words, helping to... | ||
Increase and maximize blood flow, which of course just goes to your overall health and can have a massive and tremendous impact. | ||
Nitric Boost, now 40% off at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Of course, we want to bring you good deals because we know these days the economy isn't what most of us would hope it is. | ||
In fact, it's horrible. In fact, it's just basically as bad as it can possibly be. | ||
But you wouldn't know that if you were watching mainstream media. | ||
They seem intent on trying to convince us that everything is great, actually, and that everything bad is probably Donald Trump's fault. | ||
We've got a couple of clips to share with you here. | ||
We'll start with clip number 25. | ||
Nancy Pelosi went on MSNBC yesterday to tout Bidenomics and the Entirely illusionary fabricated and nonsensical claims about the incredible success of his economic policy and She flips out at just moderate pushback from the MSNBC anchor who dares to state the obvious, who dares to mention the unspeakable, you know, the stuff that all of us know already. | ||
You're supposed to pretend you don't know this lady, and Nancy Pelosi sets her straight. | ||
Let's go now to Nancy Pelosi on MSNBC Clip 25. | ||
unidentified
|
And Joe Biden is doing that. | |
Created 9 million jobs in his term in office. | ||
Donald Trump has the worst record of job loss of any president. | ||
So we just have to make sure people know. | ||
That was a global pandemic. | ||
He had the worst record of any president. | ||
We've had other concerns in our country. | ||
If you want to be an apologist for Donald Trump, that may be your role. | ||
unidentified
|
But it ain't mine. I don't think that anybody can accuse you of that. | |
I don't think anybody can accuse me of that. | ||
No, you're a racist now, actually. | ||
You're not just an apologist for Donald Trump. | ||
You're practically a Nazi. | ||
You're a racist and a Nazi, and you're compelled by white supremacy to try to blame COVID. Probably because you hate Chinese people, if I had to guess. | ||
I mean, there's got to be some reason why you would say the truth. | ||
It can't just be that you're saying the thing that we all know to be true. | ||
Nancy Pelosi does the... | ||
The old Democrat standard of you must be an apologist for Donald Trump for daring to speak the truth. | ||
And of course she just repeats her talking point. | ||
And this is the way these talking points are designed, whether by MSNBC or mainstream media at large or by the Democrat politicians in particular. | ||
They have a phrase that is technically, in just the most technical way, true. | ||
Donald Trump had a bad record. | ||
At the end, if you take all of his presidency and compress it to just the last year in which there was a global pandemic, that... | ||
For powers outside of his control, shut down the entire world economy. | ||
If you just take that, then you can say that phrase Nancy Pelosi said, Donald Trump had the worst job record. | ||
What they don't want is any sort of context that can have any... | ||
You know, bearing on whether people think that this was Donald Trump's fault or whether it was a consequence of things outside of his control. | ||
You're just supposed to say the thing. | ||
You're just supposed to say the phrase. | ||
You're supposed to say the talking point and then leave it at that. | ||
Context, of course, destroys that talking point, so it needs to be utterly outside of context and without any relation to reality whatsoever. | ||
But they're actually doing this. They're actually trying to frame the modern economy as good. | ||
And it's not just Democrat politicians slash cryptkeeper monkeys like Nancy Pelosi. | ||
It's also the bankers as well, of course, the people that are benefiting hugely from this economy. | ||
So let's go now to clip number three. | ||
There's a woman on TikTok. | ||
And I really wish TikTokers would just not curse every other word because it puts quite a weight on our crew having to censor it. | ||
But I guess that's just the way media is shared now. | ||
Let's go to clip number three here. | ||
This woman heard Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, the largest bank in America, on the Wall Street Journal podcast saying, And had to stop it midway to make a TikTok just flabbergasted at how out of touch and dishonest he is. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. I hate to be all doomsday on this app, but America is f***ed, dude. | |
I was just listening to The Journal, which is a Wall Street Journal podcast, and they had Jamie Dimon, who is the CEO of J.P. Morgan, which is the largest bank in America on it. | ||
And within two minutes, my jaw was dropped at the s*** he was saying. | ||
It is so f***ing out of touch, and this is the largest bank in America. | ||
I had to stop and make this TikTok. | ||
Here you go. As the chief exec of America's biggest bank, you have an unrivaled insight into the financial health of the U.S. consumer. | ||
What are people doing with their money right now? | ||
Yeah. You have to look a little bit in context. | ||
The consumer's in pretty good shape right now. | ||
The consumer has, you know, unemployment's under 4% has been there for two years. | ||
They still have excess money from COVID. If you go back to looking at the amount of money that was spent during COVID, it was $6 trillion through various means and various programs. | ||
They're still spending it down. | ||
Housing prices are up, stock prices are up, jobs are plentiful. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm sorry, what? The stimulus checks? | |
The ones that went out in 2020 and 2021, three and four years ago, were still spending it down? | ||
Who is he talking about? | ||
People are not doing well. | ||
This country is literally unaffordable. | ||
Childcare, groceries, you've got Kellogg's out here telling us to eat f***ing cereal for dinner. | ||
Everything is up in price. | ||
Even for those who are making ends meet and are able to still save, we have to be conscious as far as possible. | ||
To where you're putting your money because nothing is at a good price. | ||
What does he mean the consumer is doing well? | ||
Like, these are the biggest decision makers in our financial systems. | ||
These are the people who work with Congress and who are talking about how do we create like a soft landing of inflation. | ||
And he thinks we're doing okay. | ||
Like, guys, this is scary. | ||
I mean, it's been scary. | ||
Let's be real. No one's surprised. | ||
No, no one should be surprised. | ||
No one should be flabbergasted at why Jamie Dimon is saying this. | ||
First of all, he doesn't believe it. | ||
You get that, right? He knows exactly what he's... | ||
I mean, they know this. They know this. | ||
Like she said, this is the biggest banks in the world. | ||
They have all of the information. They have all the data that they need. | ||
They know perfectly well that American consumers are not only not thriving, they're struggling to make ends meet. | ||
I mean, they have all the numbers that we do, and it proves an incontrovertible picture. | ||
It's... Horrible out there. | ||
It's just not good by any measure. | ||
Unless of course you're a banker. | ||
Unless you are 1% of the 1% or a politician or somebody with your money Propping up the stock market, but without any concern as to your day-to-day expenses. | ||
They know this. | ||
It's on purpose. They're destroying the middle class on purpose. | ||
COVID itself and the reaction to it was designed to rob your money and send it to the top. | ||
Kolesk it in the top. | ||
Consolidate it at the very top with the biggest organizations, the biggest institutions, and the biggest corporations. | ||
I mean, this is obvious. | ||
Again, from today, from Bloomberg, the delinquency rate for U.S. small businesses climbed to a three-year high this month with a small business report from Alignable finding that 43% of small businesses were unable to pay their rent in full due to economic headwinds. | ||
So while the stock market may be thriving, while there may be on paper a great jobs report, and we'll get to that in just a second, when it comes to small businesses, families, you know, the building block of the American economy, they're doing horribly. | ||
But that's by design. | ||
That's what they want. | ||
They don't want a bunch of small businesses. | ||
They want a very few number of megacorporations. | ||
That's the way it's easier to control. | ||
This is the stated design of economic policy from the likes of Jamie Dimon, the World Economic Forum, the Rockefeller Foundation, as we pointed out a million times in the lockstep document, showing that when they grade civilizations, let alone corporations, they do so on a rubric of how massive and centralized they do so on a rubric of how massive and centralized you And the more massive and centralized you are, the better they consider it. | ||
So small businesses need to be done away with. | ||
They need to be pressured economically or by regulations out of existence to make way for the massive international megacorporations like Amazon and Walmart that can be controlled in a top-down fashion and is therefore more useful for the globalist schemes that require centralized control. | ||
Money spent, the $6 trillion spent during the pandemic. | ||
I remind you through these two headlines of exactly what the outcome of that was. | ||
During the pandemic, workers lost $3.7 trillion in earning during the pandemic, while billionaires made $3.9 trillion during the pandemic. | ||
So this was a wholesale transfer of $3.7, $3.9 trillion from the middle class to the upper class, to that 1%. | ||
Billionaires made $3.9 trillion, while workers lost $3.7 trillion. | ||
These things are not unaligned, not unrelated to each other. | ||
And of course, when it comes to jobs, and the false reading of the statistics, the reality is that all jobs recovered post-COVID under Joe Biden went to foreign-born workers, including illegals. | ||
Per the Center for Immigration Studies, all employment growth has gone to the foreign-born workers. | ||
183,000 fewer U.S.-born Americans are working than in 2019 before COVID, yet the number of immigrants, legal and illegal, working is up 2.9 million over 2019. | ||
So since COVID, not only has that 3.9 trillion not been recovered by the middle class, every single job created has gone to non-Americans. | ||
Americans have lost hundreds of thousands of jobs. | ||
We'll return on the other side. | ||
Welcome back, folks. Talking about the economy. | ||
Apparently this is a thing. | ||
They're actually trying to make the economy look good despite it not being good. | ||
It's as simple as that. | ||
Nancy Pelosi on MSNBC trotting out talking points about job creation. | ||
We'll get into exactly that. | ||
How fraudulent that claim is in just a second. | ||
We just heard Jamie Dimon, CEO of the largest bank in America, saying consumers are doing great. | ||
They still have all that COVID money we gave them, right? | ||
You know, their own tax dollars that we took from them and then gave them a pittance back four years ago. | ||
That'll probably keep them going for another couple of years, right? | ||
That, what, $2,000 we got four years ago? | ||
So the economy's fine. | ||
Remember, the average American got like $1,700 two years ago, so what's the complaint? | ||
What, lunch costs $40 now? | ||
Well, you weren't complaining when we sent you $1,700 of your own money four years ago. | ||
Is that the argument they're making? | ||
I guess. I guess that's it. | ||
So again, let's look into the economy, shall we, as it stands now. | ||
From Gateway Pundit, all jobs recovered post-COVID under Joe Biden went to foreign-born workers, including illegals. | ||
We'll break this down to a greater degree in just a moment. | ||
Per the Center for Immigration Studies, all employment growth has gone to the foreign-born. | ||
183,000 fewer U.S.-born Americans are working than in 2019 before COVID, yet the number of immigrants working is up 2.9 million over 2019. | ||
So just taking immigrants out of it, if immigrants weren't a factor here, all we would have would be 183,000 fewer jobs compared to this time in 2019. | ||
So we have gained nearly 3 million jobs since 2019. | ||
All of them have gone to immigrants. | ||
All of the job growth since 2019 has gone exclusively to non-Americans. | ||
So I guess the economy is doing well because the economy is not the American people, their spending power, their overall wealth, their jobs, their retirement funds. | ||
No, it's just, it's something else. | ||
It's something independent of the quality of life of the American people. | ||
It's a set of numbers that keeps the people at the very top bathing in caviar or whatever the hell they do with all their money. | ||
It's just absolutely wild. | ||
Peter Schiff from Zero Hedge. | ||
Stagflation has finally been revealed. | ||
This week, Peter covers the dismal figures released Thursday and Friday, horrible tax policies, and the appalling lack of transparency in our government. | ||
Stagflation is back in the economy as last week's GDP and PCE figures revealed. | ||
The U.S. GDP growth metric for... | ||
The first quarter was only 1.6%, much lower than expected. | ||
To make matters worse, the PCE, that is Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index, came in hotter than expected, staying steady at 2.8%. | ||
Peter Schiff has been predicting stagflation for a while, and now that it's here, he sees mining stocks as an opportunity. | ||
You know, gold stocks. | ||
You know, people returning to real wealth when the fake fiat wealth of our system shows signs of Failing. | ||
The savings rate also dipped last month, dropping from 3.6% to 3.2%. | ||
Savings is a great economic indicator, as Peter explains. | ||
This is the lowest savings rate, I think, in a couple of years. | ||
This is not good news that Americans are having to deplete their savings. | ||
This is bad news. | ||
When the economy is good, you save more. | ||
That's when you add to your rainy day fund. | ||
You have to tap it when times are tough and you're struggling, and that's exactly what Americans are doing. | ||
They're struggling, and they're tapping into their savings in order to do it. | ||
Remind you that that is on purpose and the stated goal of the people in power. | ||
The middle class is the most likely to The middle class has to be depleted and the savings have to be depleted. | ||
And if not reversed with positive economic measures and economic measures centered around the concern for the American people and not just boosting the inflated stock market with imported slave labor, then if we don't do that, this is just going to continue until The middle class doesn't exist anymore. | ||
I don't see any other outcome of this. | ||
We're traveling down a bad road. | ||
We can either stop and turn around or we can just keep going. | ||
And the people in power just want to keep going. | ||
Live look at the economy here. | ||
For our television viewers, New York Times yesterday publishes this. | ||
Inflation is stubborn. | ||
Is the federal budget deficit making it worse? | ||
Yes. This is a segment where we just answer the questions posed by headlines. | ||
Yes. Yes, it is making it worse. | ||
The real question should be asked, is making it worse the goal? | ||
To which the answer is also yes. | ||
Yes, they don't want to make this better. | ||
Your goals are not their goals. | ||
You've got to understand this. | ||
They don't see their role in the Fed or as the president of J.P. Morgan. | ||
As serving the American people, they see their position of power as license to destroy the American people. | ||
They have different goals than you and they have different goals than the stated obligations of their positions. | ||
They're put in a position to uphold the economy and serve the American people that has no bearing on their actions, which universally, ubiquitously, they only do the opposite. | ||
They only make things worse. | ||
unidentified
|
Can I go one step further here? | |
Please. I feel like they just want to put you in a position where you're just so poor that crickets seem appetizing. | ||
There you go. Yeah, that's a good way of putting it. | ||
They want to put you in a position to where crickets actually seem appetizing, where you don't have any freedom. | ||
I mean, it really is simple as that. | ||
unidentified
|
Right. If you have a family that you have to feed, right, and you are working... | |
Two jobs, maybe three, to feed them. | ||
You're not going to have time to go vote. | ||
You're not going to have time to go protest. | ||
And if you have to rely on the government, then, you know, you'll have to be purchasing the brands that they have deals with and that EBT cards work on. | ||
So it'll be nothing but Frito-Lay and, you know, whatever parent company owns all the other fast food processed crap. | ||
unidentified
|
You know, and the other thing that I... I had a little bit of an issue, right, with that girl who exposed the Jamie Dimon press conference. | |
Was that Clip 15? Mm-hmm. | ||
You know, she was doing that TikTok from the comfort of her own home, right? | ||
I mean, ugh. | ||
Talk about complainers. | ||
I mean, soon it'll be a pod, right? | ||
And then maybe there won't be a domicile at all, right? | ||
Yeah. In that case, we'll take her seriously. | ||
And then they'll get rid of TikTok. | ||
She just won't even have anything to speak out on. | ||
And yeah, if she has time to sit there and make a three-minute TikTok, okay, she has time to work a little bit more, all right? | ||
If you have one minute in the day that you're not slaving away for Jamie Dimon, that's a wasted minute as far as he's concerned. | ||
unidentified
|
If you're leaning, you could be cleaning. | |
Yeah. But seriously, yeah. | ||
And look, this is where I think maybe our founding fathers might have made a bit of a mistake. | ||
Because Thomas Jefferson took, I'm blanking on his name, But it's life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is what it was changed to. | ||
The original phrase was life, liberty, and property. | ||
And I think, I don't blame the founding fathers on this, but the importance of private property in what it means to be free has sort of... | ||
It's lost its import. | ||
People don't understand it anymore. | ||
But the fact is, if you can own things, if you can purchase things, if you can have money to do with what you will, that's a key component of freedom. | ||
If everything you own is actually rented from a corporation, if everything you buy is just a credit from the company store, you're not free. | ||
And that's what they want. They want a world where you don't own a home, you don't own a house, you don't even own your phone. | ||
You are working day in and day out to pay down a debt that you'll never pay off fully. | ||
It's 2030. Alright, welcome back folks. | ||
We're going to try to move on from economics here in just a minute, but this is a key thing to understand and the principle of the matter transcends economics and sort of relates to everything. | ||
And it just has to do with the misconception that the people at the top care at all about the people in America. | ||
I mean, how much evidence do you need that everything they do is designed to do what it does? | ||
Things are so simple, you sound stupid even saying it. | ||
Like, even reading Peter Schiff, the quote I was reading earlier, when he's just like... | ||
Which is the one I was reading. | ||
Yeah. This is the lowest savings rate in a couple years. | ||
This is not good news that Americans are having to deplete their savings. | ||
This is bad news. | ||
Like, you almost got to get down to, you know, Dr. | ||
Seuss level... This is not good. | ||
It is bad. It really is. | ||
That's it. It's not complicated. | ||
It's not a cult, opaque, arcane understanding of economics. | ||
It's just like, this is bad. | ||
This is bad, and it's on purpose, because the people at the top are bad, because the people at the top are doing things that they know are bad for you, because you are their enemy. | ||
It's not that complicated. | ||
It's not confusing. They aren't doing their best in just failing over and over and over and over and over. | ||
When they fail with a policy, you know, they implement a policy and that policy has the reverse inversion outcome of what the stated purpose is, that's understandable, right? | ||
We all get how that works. | ||
You go, you know, we think that this might boost the economy. | ||
They do the thing, the economy gets worse. | ||
That happens. Trial and error. | ||
But what if they do it again? What if they do it again? | ||
What if they do it again and again and every time it makes the economy worse? | ||
It's time to realize that they're not trying to make the economy better. | ||
Immigration is the same thing. | ||
It's obviously not good for the American people. | ||
Whatsoever. Even a little bit. | ||
But they keep doing it. | ||
Doing it, doing it, and doing it. | ||
They are at odds with... | ||
Their policies are at odds with... | ||
They're at odds with what's good for us. | ||
They're at odds with the continuing function of our society. | ||
And if that makes you think that maybe these people are anti-American, anti-the American people, doing things on purpose to cause pain to the American people, they're actually kind of open about it, especially when it comes to things like immigration, and we'll get to that in just a little bit. | ||
But it really is that simple. | ||
The economy is not good. | ||
It's bad. The policies aren't good. | ||
They're bad. And they make everything worse. | ||
They keep doing them over and over and over. | ||
So we'll move on. | ||
But just as a final note here, we're talking about where the economy is. | ||
We have a couple stats to rely on. | ||
One would be inflation, which is just obviously bad. | ||
On the face of it, significantly worse than any time under Trump. | ||
Has not slowed down in the slightest and has indeed only increased since COVID. You've got the massive wealth transfer during COVID of nearly three or nearly four trillion dollars transferred directly from the middle class to the 1%. | ||
You've got the wholesale destruction of small businesses, tens or hundreds of thousands of which shut down, never to reopen during COVID, and the ones that did survive are now delinquent, the highest rate since COVID. So small businesses collapsing, | ||
savings collapsing, the middle class collapsing all at once, all on purpose, while the stock market is seemingly incredibly high and Jamie Dimon is Doing podcasts with the Wall Street Journal telling you how great everything is. | ||
And Nancy Pelosi is going on MSNBC to tout Biden's incredibly successful economic policies. | ||
They're not suffering under delusion. | ||
They're not confused about what's going on here. | ||
They're lying. They know exactly what's happening. | ||
And they're distorting reality to fit their ideology. | ||
And so if you have these certain metrics to determine how the economy is doing, the economy fails on all of them. | ||
But the worst and most egregious example of the deliberate collapse of the American economy can be seen with the jobs reports as zero-hedge We're good to go. | ||
Including 494,000 jobs lost in February alone. | ||
Most shocking, since May 2018, there have been zero jobs created for native-born Americans. | ||
All jobs in the last six years have gone to immigrants, legal and illegal. | ||
You're seeing some of the graphs here. | ||
I mean, each one of these is just stunning in what it is. | ||
Just the information it contains. | ||
So first, job changes since February 2023. | ||
So just in the last year or a little more, full-time jobs down at 284,000, part-time jobs up 921. | ||
So these would be the jobs that you can't actually build a family on, jobs that you can't actually use to buy a home or create savings. | ||
Just living hand to mouth, check to check. | ||
And they celebrate this. | ||
And they use these same numbers to say, look how many jobs we've created. | ||
We've created nearly a million jobs. | ||
Despite the fact that full-time jobs decreased by over a quarter million and the nearly million jobs created are all part-time, not actual careers. | ||
Just, you know, fast food service jobs, that sort of thing. | ||
Foreign-born workers, monthly change. | ||
You see the uptick in the first quarter of 2024, a record 1.2 million jobs for foreign-born workers. | ||
So there are jobs out there. | ||
There's 1.2 million of them available. | ||
They just all go to non-Americans. | ||
They just exclusively are given to everyone but you and me. | ||
Native-born versus foreign-born workers. | ||
So you can see that it was largely even, I mean, even before COVID-19, you can see a discrepancy where the foreign-born workers are privileged and prioritized and given more jobs than the native-born. | ||
And you see the crash during COVID-19. | ||
And then the slow and steady resurgence, the regaining of jobs. | ||
But then you see the native-born jobs sort of pitter out and go stagnant and return to pre-pandemic levels while the foreign-born workers just continue to climb. | ||
Is this an accident? Is this them trying their best to serve the American people and just accidentally giving all the jobs to foreign-born workers? | ||
Or is this a deliberate policy in coordination and cooperation with the immigration policies? | ||
The jobs are out there. | ||
Jobs are available. They just don't want to pay wages that American workers expect. | ||
So they import your replacement, fire you, and give your job to some Indian dude that... | ||
We'll work for significantly less. | ||
Another stunning graph here. | ||
Changes in employment since June 2018. | ||
Foreign-born workers gaining nearly 4 million jobs, while native-born workers centrally stalled out at zero. | ||
It's actually gone down moderately. | ||
100,000. | ||
180,000 actually. | ||
This is on purpose. I mean, the point of all of this is to say this is on purpose. | ||
This is by design. | ||
The people in charge are doing this on purpose. | ||
I don't know how much more clear it could possibly be. | ||
In the next hour, we're going to talk a little bit about this new phrase that's been bandied about. | ||
The woke right. | ||
In other words, the not right. | ||
Israel-obsessed right. | ||
The right-wing that actually believes in right-wing policies and foundational beliefs and morals like free speech. | ||
They want to demonize that by calling it the woke right. | ||
When you talk about wokeness, I mean there's always this like, what does woke even mean? | ||
It's pretty obvious, right? | ||
It's there. It's self-defining. | ||
Woke. It's a bastardized, kind of ghetto form of the word awake, which is what it should be. | ||
Awoken. And it's the false awakening. | ||
It's the belief that you wake up and you realize that the world is rigged. | ||
You're just given a false conception of what that paradigm looks like. | ||
And you're actually supposed to believe that it's all rigged for white guys and Americans. | ||
It's all white people. | ||
When the reality is white people are the exclusive target of the elite. | ||
It's not about white people. | ||
It's about control. | ||
And it's harder to control people that are wealthy and free. | ||
unidentified
|
What's happening on America's college campuses is horrific. | |
Anti-Semitic mobs have taken over leading universities. | ||
They call for the annihilation of Israel. | ||
It's unconscionable. It has to be stopped. | ||
It has to be condemned and condemned unequivocally. | ||
When Netanyahu demanded that the protests against Israel be stopped, the U.S. government complied because our members of Congress have all been bought and paid for with tax dollars given to the American-Israeli Political Action Committee, known as AIPAC. AIPAC openly brags about this on their official website because they don't have to register under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, which requires agents of foreign principles to register and provide transparency. | ||
Beginning in 1962, they were known as the American Zionist Council, and President John F. Kennedy was ordering them to register as a foreign agent. | ||
Along with members of the US government, the Zionists fought against this. | ||
In October of 1963, forms were prepared for them to register, but the next month, JFK was assassinated, and Israel has never been asked to register since. | ||
Four years later, Israel attacked the USS Liberty, murdering dozens of Americans and injuring over 100. | ||
The U.S. government helped them cover it up as an accident. | ||
On the day of 9-11, five Israelis, who were seen photographing the collapse of the Twin Towers and celebrating, were arrested and detained for several weeks. | ||
In documents later released by FOIA requests, the FBI redacted their faces in pictures Where they were posing in front of the burning towers and described them as being happy and jovial. | ||
One of them stated, Israel now has hope that the world will understand us. | ||
The end of the declassified document asks if they had foreknowledge of the event and were there to film it. | ||
And the answer was redacted. | ||
As soon as they were released, they returned to Israel and went on television, where they confirmed that the answer was yes. | ||
unidentified
|
The fact of the matter is we are coming from a country that experiences terror daily. | |
Our purpose was to document the event. | ||
The dancing Israelis had fake student IDs, and several accounts of suspicious Israeli art students were reported to be infiltrating government buildings. | ||
Over a hundred of these Israeli art students were arrested. | ||
Fox News reported that these art students served in military intelligence and explosive ordinance units. | ||
unidentified
|
The majority of those questioned, quote, stated they served in military intelligence, electronic surveillance intercept, and or explosive ordinance units. | |
In March of 2000, several of these Musaad art students were living in the World Trade Center as part of the World Views Artist in Residence program. | ||
They occupied floors 90 and 91, where walls were unfinished and structural beams were exposed. | ||
A member of this group of artists, Hanan Serfati, was arrested by the DEA as part of the Israeli spy ring. | ||
But the identities of an additional 14 Israelis who were with him have never been released to the public. | ||
These Israeli artists were sharing the space with a group of Austrian artists known as Gelatin, who were working on a project called The Bee Thing that involved removing windows on the 91st floor of the North Tower. | ||
A small balcony was constructed for people to stand on while photographs were taken by a helicopter. | ||
Another group, called E-Team, managed the helicopter with the designation number N666LH. This helicopter was to be in an art exhibit memorializing this project, scheduled for September 11, 2001. In March of 2001, E-Team had an art project called 127 Windows. | ||
Officially, they were going to write their name on the exterior of the tower. | ||
They had an artist's rendering of what the project was supposed to look like, but it never appears to have happened. | ||
And on 9-11, American Airlines Flight 11 crashed into the exact spot where they were supposedly preparing to do this. | ||
In 2001, Gelatin published a book on the project and described it as conspiratorial work. | ||
It includes a drawing of someone falling headfirst from the 91st floor with the words, 300 meters of pure pleasure. | ||
Gelatin was originally spelled the same as the explosive, but was officially changed in 2005. | ||
And the 9-11 Commission report does not mention gelatin, eating, or any of the Israeli missiles. | ||
Find and share that video at band.video. | ||
The Zionist death grip on the United States government. | ||
unidentified
|
- All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
The title of today's show is about NATO going to war with Ukraine. | ||
And it does appear as though that is the intention behind all of this. | ||
After all, we just gave $60-70 billion more to Ukraine. | ||
To extend their suffering, I guess. | ||
To fully depopulate the entire area. | ||
I had a story yesterday. | ||
In fact, let me pull it up here because it's a story from all the way back in 2023, but it sort of gives the game away when it comes to what the purpose of the Ukraine war is. | ||
We've covered recently the way in which the Draft law was changed in Ukraine to allow them to basically scoop up anybody 25 to 60 and throw them to the front lines or they'll be fed into the meat grinder. | ||
Ukraine has essentially been depopulated. | ||
I mean, it's... It's not going to be cheap to rebuild. | ||
It'll fall on our shoulders to rebuild it, obviously. | ||
We are the ones that started the war in the first place and have since signed agreements, whether through our government or through the IMF or through our banking institutions like Goldman Sachs, to rebuild the whole thing. | ||
Ukraine's Zelenskyy signs new army draft law to reinforce exhausted troops. | ||
You know, I see incredibly disparate numbers as to how many casualties there's actually been in Ukraine. | ||
But we basically, I mean, they basically can't find people to fight anymore. | ||
They basically, everybody in the front line has been eliminated and now they're Sending vans out to scoop up. | ||
Men from small villages. | ||
Where there are no men anymore. | ||
There have been mainstream media reports. | ||
The Ukraine villages with no more men. | ||
Because they've all been slaughtered. | ||
So of course we know what the. | ||
Solution is. | ||
To bring in Africans I guess. | ||
Maybe it will be the heavenly Israel project. | ||
Become a new homeland in addition to Israel. | ||
Could be either one. | ||
But in 2023, they published a story... | ||
And guys, maybe y'all can find it. | ||
It was in the rundown yesterday. | ||
I'm having trouble finding the rundown. | ||
Because it was basically saying, yeah, Ukraine's going to need millions and millions of people over the next few years. | ||
They're going to need immigrants. But again, war just accelerates all the globalist plans. | ||
I mean, they can do it in a plotting, systematic sort of way, where bit by bit they wear down the population through propaganda and chemical poisoning, where slowly but surely they die out in a form of collective suicide. | ||
Or you can just send them all to war, scoop them up with a draft law, and send them into machine gun fire. | ||
Either way, the end result is the same. | ||
It's a depopulated landmass where the natives have been eliminated. | ||
And it's been open to reconfiguration, reimagination by the banking institutions who will then bring in millions upon millions of third-worlders who will be a little bit more amenable to the controls that will be placed on them. | ||
After all, if you can bring somebody from the third world to the first world, Things that first-worlders would find intolerable would be a major benefit. | ||
There it is. Ukraine will be looking for 4.5 million workers in the next decade, according to Ukraine's Minister of Economy. | ||
Ukraine will have to attract an additional 4.5 million workers to the labor market over the next 10 years to carry out its post-war recovery. | ||
So that's what you're fighting for, I guess, Ukraine. | ||
Not for your people, not for your homeland, but for your homeland to be depopulated of its people and replaced. | ||
That's what you're fighting for in no uncertain terms. | ||
Whether that's fulfilled by the fighting itself and the native population is simply eliminated or driven out through the endless, senseless proxy warfare. | ||
That's one way to deplete a population or to make room for Easier controlled migrants. | ||
But even if they win, even if Ukraine somehow, and this is, by the way, a total fantasy that will never happen, but let's just pretend they actually win and succeed. | ||
Well, what are they fighting for? | ||
They're fighting for, quote, our democracy. | ||
They're fighting to be a part of the Europe that is committing suicide. | ||
They're fighting to be a part of NATO, whose every member is experiencing massive, unrelenting immigration and a Non-replacement level birth rate. | ||
That's what they're fighting for. | ||
So if it's through war, great. | ||
Very efficient way to eliminate a population. | ||
But even if they somehow win, again, impossible, then the outcome will be a just slower process of depopulation and replacement. | ||
And they not only plan on having this continue indefinitely, they're putting plans in place to ensure this continues indefinitely. | ||
Biden looks to prevent future president from ending Ukraine war with 10-year agreement. | ||
We covered this yesterday with Simon from Florida calling in, talking about the way that whether it's the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, or military alliances, these are reframed as agreements. | ||
To circumvent the legal necessity of having them actually debated by representatives in the Senate or Congress, they can simply be signed by dictate, by fiat, by the executive branch, who claim to speak for us despite their every move being at odds with our desires and what's actually good for us. | ||
So on the heels of President Biden last week signing into law a $61 billion aid package for Ukraine's defense, President Volodymyr Zelensky on Sunday indicated that he's working with Washington on a bilateral security agreement which would last 10 years. | ||
But we're already working on specific text, Zelensky said in a nightly video address. | ||
Our goal is to make this agreement the strongest of all. | ||
We're discussing the specific foundations of our security and cooperation. | ||
We're also working to fix specific levels of support for this year and the next 10 years. | ||
He indicated it will likely include agreements on long-term support centering on military hardware and joint arms production, as well as continuing reconstruction aid. | ||
The agreement should be truly exemplary and reflect the strength of American leadership, Zelensky said. | ||
Yes, the exemplary leadership of the Pied Piper. | ||
Follow us into a world of replacement migration and suicidal leftism. | ||
He indicated it will, or rather, ultimately, the key purpose in locking such a long-term deal would be to keep it immune from potential interference by a future Trump administration. | ||
So not only are these so-called agreements circumventing the need for or requirement of discussion by our representatives in the Senate or Congress, they're trying to take it out of the hand of the executive as well. | ||
And this is our democracy. | ||
After all, this is what they're fighting to be a part of, I guess. | ||
Supposedly. So hey, whether all of your men are simply slaughtered by Russian tanks or by imported Africans, the outcome is the same because the leadership is the same. | ||
Because they hate the people they're supposed to serve. | ||
and find that the most convenient way of getting rid of them is to get them to participate in the destruction. | ||
Below is what the Wall Street Journal spelled out last year. | ||
Again, this is from Infowars.com. | ||
The goal is to make sure Ukraine will be strong enough in the future to deter Russia from attacking it again. | ||
More importantly, Ukraine's Western allies hope to discourage the Kremlin from thinking it can wait out the Biden administration for a potentially more sympathetic successor in the White House. | ||
Western officials are looking for ways to lock in pledges of support and limit future government's abilities to backtrack amid fears in Western and European capitals that Donald Trump, if he recaptures the White House, would seek to scale back aid. | ||
Trump has a wide lead in early voting in the Republican primary field, the early polling, but soundly lost the 2020 election to President Biden and has been indicted on four criminal cases in state and federal courts. | ||
Yeah, soundly defeated by the mail-in ballots and cheating and lies. | ||
We and others have previously underscored that NATO and G7 countries are desperately trying to Trump-proof future aid to Ukraine and the effort to counter Russia. | ||
As for the first new weapon package in the wake of the $61 billion being authorized, the Biden administration has announced a new arms package totaling $7 billion. | ||
The U.S. has vowed to rush the weapons to Kiev, given that all indicators its forces are not doing well on the front lines. | ||
So put yourself in the mindset of Russia, because I think this InfoWars article hits on a very important aspect of this. | ||
To Russia, they understand that the current administration is completely obstinate and unwilling to make any peace deal, no matter how favorable it is. | ||
Actually, maybe that's another thing I need to pull up from a few days ago. | ||
See, these things come up every once in a while, and if I don't cover them right when they come up, maybe there's other stuff going on and I have other stuff to talk about, but then later we want to return to it and find exactly what it's all about. | ||
The peace agreement was leaked just a few days ago. | ||
The peace agreement back in 2022 that they could have achieved, but were prevented from doing so by the UK and the US. So there could have been peace. | ||
So if you're Russia and you're looking at this, you're thinking, okay, the Biden administration... | ||
The handlers, the controllers that run America right now are obstinate, refuse to even negotiate or discuss potential peace terms, seem dedicated to ensuring the suicidal participation of Ukraine in this war. | ||
You think, you know, maybe we can sort of hold our position now until Trump gets into office. | ||
Maybe he'll be more amenable to a peace agreement. | ||
But then if you look at the way that the support is being locked in for 10 years, and the understanding of how American politics is being manipulated to prevent Donald Trump from having any sizable impact on the outcome or prospect of peace in Ukraine, then you have to change your tactics a little bit. | ||
And we've discussed this before, but the obvious reaction would be to Just go full bore. | ||
Just go, okay, we weren't going to try to capture all of Ukraine. | ||
I mean, obviously, from their actions and from the way that the war has played out so far, they had very specific goals to capture and retain the eastern districts of Ukraine, where the Russian majority was being oppressed and terrorized by the Zelensky regime. | ||
For years and years. They've done that. | ||
They've held it. They've tried to negotiate peace. | ||
Ukraine's been prevented from making that peace. | ||
So are you just going to sit there and continue to fight it out over these few little pockets of land? | ||
Or are you going to go, alright, well, if this is going to go on for 10 years, we better just end it now. | ||
We better just go into Ukraine full force and take out Kyiv and... | ||
Just do the things that America has been saying Russia's gonna do the whole time. | ||
Because then, Russia does that, America would say, see, we told you, that was Russia's plan the entire time. | ||
NATO has to go to war with them. | ||
So they're really, like, forcing Russia into a position where they have to do the thing that they weren't ever gonna do before, but that America has been claiming that they were gonna do. | ||
to do. | ||
It's sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy from the Americans. | ||
unidentified
|
All this seems obvious to me. | |
you Thank you. | ||
And NATO, of course, is making very big movements towards this ultimate conflict with Russia, staging hundreds of thousands of troops very near the border, staging even nuclear bombers and things close to the Russian border over and over. | ||
Again, I really hope you don't actually need me to explain this to you. | ||
It is all manifestly obvious. | ||
Just could not be more blatant what they're doing. | ||
I mean, we'll return to that in just a little bit. | ||
But this, of course, ties directly into it. | ||
Because as we know, America is not and has not for a while been run by our elected representatives. | ||
We're run by the deep state, the permanent state, the spy state, the dizzying array of military or law enforcement organizations in the U.S. government, like the CIA. That's from Zero Hedge. | ||
Does the CIA run America? | ||
He says, we've all surely had dark thoughts that the CIA is really running the United States, including many media venues. | ||
Maybe that's been true for decades and we just didn't know it. | ||
Oh, did you not know that? | ||
I'm sorry, Jeffrey Tucker, were you not aware of this? | ||
We've all had dark thoughts that the CIA is running America. | ||
Maybe they have for decades and we just didn't know we knew it. | ||
No, we've been saying it actually. | ||
For quite a bit. Maybe you were tricked by the fact that the media called that a conspiracy theory. | ||
Maybe that's because you missed the part where the CIA runs the media. | ||
So yeah, they're going to use the media to cover up their all-out takeover and just total subversion of democracy. | ||
If so, let's just say that it would explain a tremendous amount of what has otherwise been clouded in secrecy. | ||
How would this be possible? | ||
Well, knowledge is power, while secret knowledge is full control. | ||
Even fake knowledge means power and control, such as we found out in the phony Russiagate investigation early in Trump's term. | ||
They hounded the new administration for years under a completely fake scenario in which Russia somehow got Donald Trump elected. | ||
Yes, that was an intelligence operation all along, one directly designed to overthrow an election, a color revolution on our own soil. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
And remember, the key part to understand about Russiagate is it was so obvious. | ||
It was so blatant the way that they did it. | ||
The only thing that explains it is that they really thought they were going to win. | ||
They thought that Hillary Clinton would get into office and they would... | ||
Either just bury the Rushgate investigation, be able to get away with spying on Trump and destroying his campaign. | ||
I mean, they really expected to find something. | ||
They really did expect that if they opened an investigation, they would find something to pin on Trump. | ||
They'd be able to go public with it, sink his campaign. | ||
Hillary Clinton would get into office. | ||
All of the illegal maneuvers they did to destroy Trump's campaign would be covered up and made to disappear. | ||
Or, you know, it would be expanded and Hillary Clinton in office would go after Trump, just like they're going after him now, post his presidency. | ||
They would have done that in 2017 had Hillary Clinton won because they understood the threat that Donald Trump posed to the system, to the order that runs America. | ||
And they were going to make an example out of him one way or another. | ||
So yes, that was an intelligence operation all along. | ||
And it's an amazing fact that it didn't work and that it was all exposed. | ||
They really thought all those text messages about an insurance policy, all of the machinations about the Steele dossier and Crossfire Hurricane, they really thought all that was just going to get brushed under the rug, be successful in its attempt to destroy Donald Trump, And then be used as a precedent for destroying other political dissidents in the future. | ||
The fact that they failed should really give you some hope. | ||
The fact that nothing has come from their failure should again plunge you into the depths of despair on how ineffective our system is at actually rooting out real corruption. | ||
The fact that it's so obvious and apparent and proven beyond any reasonable doubt at this point that the intelligence agencies tried and failed to rig the 2016 election and then did rig the 2020 election, yet the people involved who just are caught in their own words describing what they're doing have not faced the slightest punishment. | ||
That is a little bit depressing. | ||
And we've got to do something about that. | ||
But the fact that they failed in the first place is at least evidence that they're not all powerful. | ||
They can't get away with everything all the time. | ||
But this author goes on. | ||
How dare an agency not elected by the people and evading oversight and public accountability put itself ahead of the Constitution and the rule of law? | ||
It's been going on for many decades as the agencies have gained ever more power, even to the point of forcing a full lockdown of America and even the world under false pretenses. | ||
Because remember, the CIA was the The orchestrating body that was in charge of the creation and release of COVID-19 in the first place. | ||
All of these are intelligence agency operations. | ||
And the intelligence agencies are not controlled by Americans. | ||
controlled by international banks for shadowy and despotic purposes none of this is verifiable precisely because the secrecy involved it's not as if the intelligence community is going to send out a press release saying quote democracy in america is an illusion we know because we control nearly everything plus we aspire to control even more yeah they're not Matt, the incredulous among us will shoot back. | ||
Look at what you're saying. | ||
Your conspiracy theory is non-falsifiable. | ||
The less evidence you have for it, the more you believe it. | ||
How in the world can we argue with you? | ||
Your position is not really plausible, but there's nothing we can do to convince you otherwise. | ||
Let's grant the point. | ||
Still, let's not dismiss the theory completely. | ||
Based on New York Times piece that appeared last week, it contains more than a grain of salt, a grain of truth. | ||
The article is titled Campaign Puts Trump and Spy Agencies on a Collision Course. | ||
And we covered this yesterday, or last week rather. | ||
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
Pointing out the way that they were framing it is Donald Trump opposing the intelligence agency as some new unprecedented danger in the course of American politics. | ||
Ignoring, downplaying, or not reporting the fact that this very dangerous precedent, I agree it is a dangerous precedent, was set by the intelligence agencies who started to spy on an attempt to destroy the Trump campaign before he was ever in office. | ||
These people, you know, act like there's a big danger that Trump is against the intelligence agencies. | ||
They should be outraged at the behavior of the intelligence agencies, but of course they're not. | ||
The intelligence community led by the CIA, this guy says it's not the deep state, but it is. | ||
The CIA is the deep state. | ||
The deep state is an international cabal. | ||
As we discussed with Ian Carroll, I thought he put it really well in saying that the power that the financiers have is almost total. | ||
The one thing that banks don't have power over, don't have the authority to do, is to carry out violence under the sanction of state power. | ||
But they do have that when they outsource their attacks through the intelligence communities that they control. | ||
The international intelligence community of which the CIA is a major and central player, but not the only player. | ||
So we'll return to this article on the other side. | ||
I want to remind you to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
As maybe other people haven't realized that we've been under control of the deep state for decades, but Infowars has been telling you that the whole time. | ||
Why do you think the deep state has tried to destroy us in particular? | ||
Alright, welcome back folks. | ||
Let's get into what's happening on college campuses around the country. | ||
It's chaotic, to say the least. | ||
And this is just the build-up. | ||
They're just warming the engine. | ||
They're just getting ready to go all out as we get closer to the election. | ||
And I would just love, I would love if the protesters could actually stick to the thing they're protesting. | ||
It just really feels like deja vu with Black Lives Matter. | ||
Where you can sit here and call out abuses by our government for years. | ||
Completely ignored, completely suppressed. | ||
Not getting any traction. | ||
Until the left-wing billionaires decide to get involved. | ||
I decided to get involved and then... | ||
Not only does the cause become suddenly just everywhere and massive and inspire riots and protests across the country, but completely miss the actual underlying cause of the issues. | ||
For years and years, I mean, Infowars was on the forefront of calling out The abuses of police in a variety of different ways, but not just like singular events, | ||
but the way that systemically the police were being turned against civilians in America, being trained deliberately to see the American people as an enemy force that needed to be violently suppressed. | ||
unidentified
|
And for years... | |
This problem was ignored until Black Lives Matter came around to hijack the whole thing, co-opt it, and turn it against white people. | ||
As if the existence of white people was the problem, not the authoritarian, jackbooted behavior of our domestic police forces. | ||
That was annoying. That was frustrating. | ||
Fast forward four years. | ||
Now we have the Palestine issue. | ||
Again, something that we've seen no real movement against for the decades that the outrages have gone on. | ||
Finally, the last six months, Israel's behavior in Gaza seems to have broken through to the mainstream. | ||
People are standing up for Gaza. | ||
A time when there could be unity from both sides of the aisle who are sick of our sycophantic adherence to the state of Israel. | ||
A time when mass grassroots political organization could actually positively impact The American political establishment and free us from control by foreign influence. | ||
Of course, like clockwork instead, it has now been co-opted, subverted, and hijacked by radical socialists and communists who will not only completely fail to achieve any positive developments when it comes to Gaza, | ||
but are instead A, pushing ridiculous, destructive policies on America, like socialism at large, but also giving the right wing in American government the excuse they need to crack down on free speech overall. | ||
Again, the only thing Republicans had to do was nothing. | ||
This is a split within the Democratic Party, as many people have pointed out. | ||
People on both sides of these protests are going to vote for Biden. | ||
The pro-Israel group are largely Democrats. | ||
The pro-Palestinian group is almost entirely Democrats. | ||
Here's a little civil war in the Democratic Party going on. | ||
All Republicans had to do was nothing. | ||
They had said nothing. | ||
They'd done nothing. | ||
They could have sat back and watched as their enemies devoured themselves and fought with each other over this incredibly divisive issue. | ||
Instead, Republicans have done the one worst thing they could possibly do and brutally try to repress these actually peaceful protests. | ||
Which we reported as soon as they started sending the thugs out. | ||
It was never going to stop the protest. | ||
The only outcome possible here was that they would expand and grow. | ||
Because you're seeing innocent, peaceful protesters who are actually just sitting there on the ground or linking arms. | ||
Not burning down buildings. | ||
Not throwing rocks at strangers. | ||
Not doing all the stuff that Black Lives Matter did for months on end. | ||
But just protesting. When the stormtroopers roll in and start brutally arresting everybody. | ||
So now, people that didn't actually care that much, but maybe they actually care about free speech, so now they're going to get involved. | ||
Again, not only would it have been beneficial for the Republicans to just not do anything and allow the left to eat itself, that would have been fine. | ||
It was actually an opportunity to legitimately stand up For the beliefs they profess to believe. | ||
This is actually an opportunity for Republicans to say, I don't like these protesters, I don't like what they're protesting, but we have free speech in this country, and look, we've been warning you, leftists, For the last 10 years, | ||
and more, I mean, for decades, we have been warning about the restrictions of free speech, about the importance of reaffirming the First Amendment, about the danger of giving your government the authority to shut down protests or gatherings that are peaceful. | ||
This could have actually been a time to stand on principle And maybe even win some converts. | ||
Maybe even open people's eyes to the reality of censorship. | ||
Instead, the GOP, as it exists in the American government, came out with one voice to condemn the First Amendment, essentially. | ||
Josh Hawley is sort of the perfect example. | ||
He says this about one of the protests. | ||
Expel the students, fire the faculty, send the National Guard to protect Jewish students on campus. | ||
Fire the faculty, expel the students, arrest the protesters. | ||
This in response to a video, clip number five, that will roll now. | ||
You tell me what you see wrong in this video. | ||
Let's watch. Oh look, they're standing there. | ||
Oh look, it's a bunch of boomers in vests with their arms linked. | ||
This is the video. | ||
To which Josh Hawley responded by calling for them all to be expelled and fired and arrested. | ||
You see anything wrong with this? | ||
You see any outrageous violations of the First Amendment here? | ||
You see anything exceeding free speech? | ||
This is the insanity. | ||
They're just standing there, Josh. | ||
So what are you talking about? | ||
Expel them? Fire them? | ||
Arrest them? They're literally standing arm in arm, hurting nobody, doing nothing wrong. | ||
So what's the message you're sending? | ||
That you don't care about free speech. | ||
You don't actually care about the First Amendment. | ||
And I was wondering, I was thinking, okay, Josh Hawley is so... | ||
Brutalistic in his response to this. | ||
He's so outraged at these boomers standing around. | ||
I wonder what his reaction to Black Lives Matter was. | ||
Did he have the same response to that? | ||
I mean, obviously not, because nobody did. | ||
Nobody saw peaceful protesters just standing arm in arm and said, arrest them, send in the National Guard. | ||
That would have been ridiculous. So what was Hawley's response to Black Lives Matter? | ||
I'll tell you about that on the other side of this commercial break. | ||
Stay with us, folks. Yes, a bunch of old boomer professors in yellow vests or orange vests standing linked arm to arm with their masks over their faces is enough to have Josh Hawley, the state of Missouri, Say, expel the students, fire the faculty, send in the National Guard. | ||
Shut them down. | ||
Shut them down immediately. And I was just wondering, okay, this is how severely he reacts to just legitimately peaceful protests against a foreign nation on American soil. | ||
Something explicitly allowed by the First Amendment. | ||
And the obvious question is, where were you during Black Lives Matter? | ||
Where was this energy... When there's a Marxist color revolution burning entire city blocks. | ||
So I wanted to go back and see what Josh Hawley's position on Black Lives Matter was. | ||
He actually spoke out against Black Lives Matter quite a bit. | ||
But the reason he did so... | ||
Maybe shouldn't surprise you. | ||
From Breitbart all the way back in July of 2020. | ||
Black Lives Matter, quote, trying to hijack conversation about justice for George Floyd for their own Marxist agenda. | ||
He said, quote, Black Lives Matter is an organization, I think. | ||
You just go to their website and look at what they believe. | ||
They are Marxists. They have statements against the state of Israel. | ||
So he was against Black Lives Matter for the same reason he's against these protests. | ||
Defense of the state of Israel. | ||
Wouldn't it be something? Wouldn't it be amazing if we had a government of our own? | ||
This is a radical idea where like the American people could get together and appoint people to serve as authorities to protect our interests and oppose our enemies. | ||
We don't have that. | ||
That doesn't exist as far as I'm concerned. | ||
There's one overriding concern for the people in power in the government of America, and it ain't the American people. | ||
It's people of a foreign nation. | ||
I thought that was pretty incredible. | ||
Josh Hawley was actually pretty hardcore against Black Lives Matter. | ||
Oh, because they're anti-Israel. | ||
Great. Not because they were anti-white. | ||
Not because they... | ||
Trying to destroy our country, not because they explicitly and violently oppose Western civilization. | ||
That's all fine and good. | ||
He actually supports that. | ||
He literally is like, they're distracting from justice from George Floyd. | ||
The implication being he's in favor of that. | ||
It's just when that turns into some anti-Israel stuff, now he's pissed. | ||
And we go to some of these videos of what's been going on in college campuses. | ||
The crew's been playing some of his B-roll. | ||
Clip two here. A shelter-in-place order was issued due to the violent protest taking place at Virginia Commonwealth University where riots are occurring. | ||
We can go to clip two. | ||
Now, let's just be clear here. | ||
When they say violent protest, what they mean is protest. | ||
I know it can be very confusing. | ||
It's very topsy-turvy out there. | ||
Remember during Black Lives Matter, the peaceful but fiery protests were when dozens of people were being killed, entire city blocks were being burned down. | ||
That was peaceful. In this video, the violent protests are a bunch of students standing arm in arm while a phalanx of soldiers approaches and attacks them. | ||
So all I'm interested in is the truth. | ||
If Black Lives Matter had been walking around Just waving signs. | ||
I would have had no problem with that. | ||
I wouldn't have agreed with their goals or the thing that they were protesting because it didn't exist. | ||
We would have pointed that out. | ||
But it was, you know, the violence and the arson and the murder that we were concerned with and nothing was done to stop it. | ||
In fact, everything was done to encourage and facilitate it. | ||
So let's go to this video. | ||
I just wanted to let you know I did not give it the title. | ||
Mentioning violent protest. | ||
That was how this was posted. | ||
I just wanted to clarify that the protest wasn't violent until the police showed up. | ||
Let's watch. I'm going to probably turn down the audio here. | ||
It's just a bunch of yelling, and I don't know if there's curse words or anything, but there are the students standing around with plywood and You know, wood barricades and the police rock up and start dismantling it, hitting them with their shields, arresting people, you know, tear gas and billy clubs. | ||
Now look at this violent protest. | ||
Again, the only violence I'm seeing is from the police. | ||
I mean, the crowd is throwing things at them. | ||
And we see the arrest taking place. | ||
This is in Virginia, Richmond, Virginia. | ||
This is taking place. Clip number seven is from Columbia University where students took over a building. | ||
And we can just roll that here. | ||
You see them bashing out the window. | ||
We're again an ostensibly righteous cause opposing war, opposing the Deliberate eradication of a native population by an imperial force has been hijacked, co-opted, subverted, taken over, the original purpose destroyed. | ||
And of course, Republicans can't help but fulfill all of the worst stereotypes and just be the bad guy that the Democrats need right now. | ||
To unify both sides of this conflict. | ||
Both of whom vote Democrat and hate white people. | ||
Here you see the building actually being taken over. | ||
As the brutal repression of this activity does nothing but encourage the protest. | ||
Again, because you're going to have People who actually care about the First Amendment or who think, I don't really care about Palestine and Israel, but I do see college kids being stomped by stormtroopers, and that's not American. | ||
Again, what a perfect opportunity for Republicans to cause dissension in the ranks of their enemies by staying out of this conflict or by actually standing up in a night of terror. | ||
Standing up for the beliefs that they espoused, propound continuously. | ||
Clip 18, law enforcement moving in at the University of Texas campus in Austin to clear an encampment. | ||
Go now to clip number 18. | ||
Here you see again the stormtroopers making their way. | ||
Remember when Tim Pool told me this was impossible? | ||
Now there will be denial of area and the federal government will be so incompetent it won't be able to enforce its authority. | ||
The federal government hasn't even gotten involved yet. | ||
These are local cops. It's all by choice. | ||
Everything that's happened in the last several years is by choice. | ||
That's what's on display here, is that at any moment, they could have shut down the Black Lives Matter riots. | ||
At any moment, they could shut down the invasion happening at our southern border. | ||
It is a choice being made. | ||
We have really infinite power in this country. | ||
I mean, the American government... | ||
Can do whatever it wants to do whenever it wants to do it. | ||
The money, the authority, the manpower, the ability, the skills. | ||
We still have all of that. | ||
Now, this is the danger of anarcho-tyranny. | ||
If it was just anarchy, that would be a whole different story. | ||
If the American government was just incapable of stopping all of this stuff from bubbling up and... | ||
People coming over our border and Marxist organizing to overthrow the government. | ||
If they were just incompetent, incapable, that'd be fine because they'd also be incompetent, incapable of stopping the backlash to that. | ||
They're extremely competent. | ||
They're extremely capable. | ||
They're just in control of people who despise us. | ||
Flip 19, likely dozens arrested, many of them carried out. | ||
I'm going to go to clip 19 here. | ||
This is again at UT. You know, zip-tied, hand behind his back, some hippie dude. | ||
Some hippie kid carried like a trust hog out by the loyal golem of the people in power. | ||
The just-following orders, stormtroopers, Fat, overweight police officers apparently can't get a handle on the massive drug problem and homelessness crisis and crime wave swallowing American cities. | ||
If a couple of college students get together to oppose the nation state of Israel, you better believe they're going to stomp that out of existence. | ||
All we had to do was nothing. | ||
Instead, they enthusiastically make themselves the enemy of everyone. | ||
unidentified
|
This is exactly what they're considering here, which is the question of whether a president has absolute immunity. | |
And then there's a second question here. | ||
Biden lawfare circus has taken a dangerous turn for the former psychotics-in-chief. | ||
I don't know why we're surprised by Trump. | ||
How many times does he have to prove we can't be trusted? | ||
Trump attorney D. John Sauer presented a moment of clarity to the power-mad deep state pawns. | ||
unidentified
|
Without presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, there can be no presidency as we know it. | |
For 234 years of American history, no president was ever prosecuted for his official acts. | ||
If a president can be charged, put on trial, and imprisoned for his most controversial decisions as soon as he leaves office, That looming threat will distort the president's decision-making precisely when bold and fearless action is most needed. | ||
Every current president will face de facto blackmail and extortion by his political rivals while he is still in office. | ||
Could President George W. Bush have been sent to prison for obstructing an official proceeding or allegedly lying to Congress to induce war in Iraq? | ||
The decision of one man To launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq. | ||
I mean, of Ukraine. | ||
Could President Obama be charged with murder for killing U.S. citizens abroad by drone strike? | ||
But these decisions must be made, given my responsibility to protect the American people. | ||
Could President Biden someday be charged with unlawfully inducing immigrants to enter the country illegally for his border policies? | ||
I would, in fact, make sure that there is, we immediately, surge to the border. | ||
unidentified
|
The original meaning of the executive vesting clause, the framers' understanding and intent, an unbroken historical tradition spanning 200 years, and policy considerations rooted in the separation of powers all counsel against it. | |
Meanwhile, Biden, DOJ attorney Michael Dreeben and special counsel Jack Smith attempted to claim the Constitution does not grant presidential immunity. | ||
Of course, Dreeben, when asked if Obama could be tried for murder for the drone strikes, he has openly admitted to, argued this could not be the case. | ||
unidentified
|
Mr. Dreeben, are you saying that there's no immunity, presidential immunity, even for official acts? | |
Yes, Justice Thomas, the president as the head of the Article 2 branch can assert as applied Article 2 objections to criminal laws that interfere with an exclusive power possessed by the president or that prevent the president from accomplishing his constitutionally assigned functions. | ||
Fortunately or unfortunately, there is a long-standing history of criminal activity protected by this assumed immunity. | ||
As Justice Clarence Thomas pointed out regarding the JFK-era CIA Operation Mongoose and subsequently Operation Northwoods. | ||
unidentified
|
Not so distant past, certain presidents have engaged in various activity, coups or operations like Operation Mongoose, and yet there were no prosecutions. | |
Why? If what you're saying is right, it would seem that that would have been right for criminal prosecution of someone. | ||
So, Justice Thomas, I think this is a central question. | ||
The reason why there have not been prior criminal prosecutions is that there were not crimes. | ||
We're looking at a plan to blow things up on American soil, and then to blame it all on Cuba. | ||
Operation Mongoose was a multifaceted chess game played on the global stage. | ||
Covert operations took on various forms, from sabotage to propaganda campaigns. | ||
The objective was create internal dissent, sow discord, and ultimately overthrow Castro's regime. | ||
Careful what you ask for, deep state lawfare adherents. | ||
Even a kid waving his middle finger at decrepit, derelict Biden knows A little kid standing with his middle finger, seven years old, eight years old. | ||
Well, I promise, it happens all the time. | ||
The only thing separating Biden from a prison cell is his presidential immunity marinating in plausible deniability. | ||
unidentified
|
And I remember looking at Jim Biden and saying, how are you guys getting away with this? | |
Like, aren't you concerned? | ||
unidentified
|
And he looked at me and he laughed a little bit and said, Plausible deniability. | |
All right, folks. Find and share that at infowars.com, band.video. | ||
Chaos unfolds. Biden Loftver Circus enters dangerous territory. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, this is the American Journal. | |
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
unidentified
|
entered into the third hour of today's broadcast. | |
And I'm sorry if... | ||
Seems a little low energy today. | ||
I just feel almost resigned to this at this point. | ||
Because, I mean, at what point do people wake up? | ||
At what point do people realize everything from the economy to the wars to the protests? | ||
I mean, at what point? | ||
Does it have to arrive before people actually understand what's happening and do something to positively affect not just America, but the world? | ||
I mean, it's just so blatant how everything is happening right now. | ||
And again, it's not like I even have to explain this. | ||
They're just telling you what the deal is. | ||
They're just telling you what they're doing. | ||
It's like we have to even come up with some sort of, you know, new ideology to replace the old one because the old one is faulty and, you know, we're struggling to come up with some new framework for the future. | ||
It's just, we could just stop this at any point. | ||
At any point, any of these problems could be halted and reversed. | ||
Because they keep doing the same thing over and over, and things just keep getting worse and worse. | ||
It's just like, at what point? | ||
At what point? | ||
How many times do we have to say the same things over and over? | ||
For 30 years, InfoWars has been telling you that deep state intelligence agencies are in control. | ||
They're using surveillance and censorship and these very basic things that we've known about for hundreds of years. | ||
I mean, they are explicitly prohibited by the U.S. Constitution because all the way back in 1776 they knew that this was the threat to American liberty and prosperity and continuing existence. | ||
So how can these principles that we have known about for hundreds of years just go away all of a sudden? | ||
It just don't matter anymore. | ||
I got articles of Republican politicians just literally saying the same thing that we rage at Democrats for saying. | ||
Just verbatim. This is hate speech. | ||
Republican Governor Kevin Stitt says protesters won't be tolerated in Oklahoma. | ||
Wait, what? | ||
Have you not been watching for the last 10 years the way that claims of hate speech are used to discredit and silence legitimate political opposition? | ||
Who is on our side? | ||
It ain't the Republicans. | ||
Damn sure ain't the Democrats. | ||
It's not any other foreign nation. | ||
It's not our own nation. | ||
Is anybody on our side? | ||
Can anybody do anything to help the American people? | ||
Can we do anything to help ourselves? | ||
Or will we be ruthlessly stamped out in the same way that they're ruthlessly stamping out Palestinian protesters? | ||
Because when they want to, they do it. | ||
And I know it's just a fantasy. | ||
I know it's cliche at this point. | ||
But I still like to imagine. | ||
I just like to imagine a world where a government served its most basic function of protecting the people in its charge. | ||
Just the most basic. | ||
And it'd be one thing if this was some sort of Utopian vision. | ||
I'm sure the communists out there love laying in bed at night and imagining some nonsense, non-existent world of total equality. | ||
And they can sit there and fantasize about something that will never exist, could never exist. | ||
There's no feasible path towards that requires just impossible human behavior. | ||
That's not what I'm doing, though. | ||
What I'm doing is just imagining a world in which the government does what it already does, but just for us instead of for other people. | ||
That's all. It's not impossible. | ||
It's not a fantasy. It's not utopian. | ||
I imagine a world where America has the same border security as Israel. | ||
I imagine a world where the American people Receive the same concern from our government that Israelis do. | ||
Of a world where the Black Lives Matter insurrection is ruthlessly hunted down, arrested, destroyed in the same way that the innocent protesters wandering through the Capitol on January 6th were. | ||
That's how I know it's possible. | ||
That's how I know that what I desire is not out of the realm of feasibility, because I see it being done, just not for us. | ||
I mean, January 6th, you've got banks reporting statements from anybody who's in D.C. on the off chance that they might have participated in what It was manifestly obvious. | ||
I mean, just like incontrovertibly was a peaceful protest. | ||
I was attacked by police. | ||
And unexpectedly spilled into the Capitol. | ||
And I just imagine, what if that same level of investigative and prosecutorial power was leveled against the highly coordinated, highly orchestrated, and actually hugely damaging 2020 elections? | ||
What if everybody in a Black Lives Matter text message group was charged in a RICO case? | ||
For attempting to overthrow the government, burning down buildings and murdering people. | ||
What if 13 banks worked with the feds to provide them with the transactions of thousands of Black Lives Matter supporters so they could root them out, kick down their door in the middle of the night, drag them away from their screaming families. | ||
It'd actually be justice. | ||
This... | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
No, instead they get $10,000 checks from the government. | ||
Instead the government's writing those people $10,000 checks and they're putting peaceful pro-lifers in jail for 22 days in solitary confinement. | ||
That's a story from Infowars.com. | ||
Jailed pro-lifer says she was kept in solitary confinement for 22 days with lights on 24-7. | ||
For what? I was sitting in front of a Abortion clinic, of course. | ||
She received this punishment, apparently, for sharing foods with her fellow prisoners. | ||
A woman named Idoni, Heather Idoni, said she was allowed to walk outside of her cell for only two hours in the middle of the night each day and that her lights of her cell were continually kept on. | ||
She's been in prison since last autumn. | ||
She was charged with the FACE Act. | ||
Or if you protest an abortion clinic, you could go to jail for decades. | ||
So that's the thing. I like to fantasize about a world in which our government simply served the American people and just fulfilled its, I mean, literally its most basic function. | ||
If you were to boil down government into one thing, there's one thing. | ||
That undergirded the entire concept of a government. | ||
It would be to protect the people inside the country from the people outside the country. | ||
We can't even get them to do that. | ||
So it might be a fantasy because of the way the world works right now, because of the way the deep state has systematically Usurped power from elected representatives over the last several decades, from the way in which foreign dollars dictate our policy and our elections in the form of AIPAC. I get that it's a fantasy. | ||
It's not an impossible utopian one. | ||
It's a very reasonable one. | ||
And what you have to realize is that obviously this is all on purpose. | ||
Obviously they could at any moment put the criminals in prison, shut down the anti-American color revolution that's being orchestrated by foreign billionaires in this country. | ||
They could shut the border. | ||
They could provide incentives to increase the birth rate. | ||
They could limit the number of immigrants, illegal or legal, that are taking American jobs. | ||
They could undo the wealth transfer that took place during COVID-19. | ||
Any of these things are imminently possible, so possible that they are being done just in reverse. | ||
Just when it doesn't benefit us, they act with extreme rapidity and capability. | ||
Anything that we want, it is impossible, apparently. | ||
So I do fantasize about a January 6th-style prosecution against the Black Lives Matter rioters. | ||
An Israeli-style wall at our southern border. | ||
American military working in our defense instead of our Expropriation and abuse. | ||
It's all eminently possible. | ||
It's just a choice that our leaders are making. | ||
It's a choice we're allowing them to make. | ||
And it's the ignorance of the American people that allowed them to get away with it. | ||
As you may know, one of the aspects of the bipartisan bill that fearless leader Mike Johnson Cooperated with the Democrats to get through. | ||
Not only spends hundreds of billions of dollars on overseas wars that have nothing to do with us and benefit us, not in the slightest. | ||
You got $3.4 billion slipped in to supercharge mass migration, in this case specifically from the Middle East. | ||
Tucked away in the $95 billion military aid package for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan is $3.5 billion in a slush fund to open new processing center for Muslim migrants. | ||
And what Senator Eric Schmidt described as a bid to supercharge mass migration from the Middle East. | ||
$3.4 billion specifically to import as many people as humanly possible. | ||
So I want to go down to a video. | ||
This is by a user who has just been coming out with better and better stuff recently. | ||
Uber Boyo. | ||
He's on... Twitter, at least, at uberboyo. | ||
I've spelled exactly how it sounds. | ||
I assume he's also on TikTok and other platforms. | ||
So shout out to him, because I'm going to play his video in full. | ||
I really think it's just that good. | ||
But I encourage you to go follow and support him. | ||
Pretty simple. Immigration is a tool of warfare. | ||
Here's the video by Uber Boyo, clip number 12. | ||
I'm sorry, clip number 13. | ||
unidentified
|
The former UKIP leader Neil Hamilton has just gone on the record as saying... | |
I think we should send every single illegal immigrant to Britain over to Newry or somewhere like that so that they can walk across the border... | ||
My word, that's a heavy-handed statement. | ||
This makes me wonder if immigration is not some type of moral, compassionate project that all we Europeans are engaging in, but instead, immigration may be a tool of warfare, utilised by bad actors and states to get vengeance upon people they don't like. | ||
This UKIP member from the UK is saying that he wants to do this to the Irish because the Irish had some petty problem with him during Brexit. | ||
It's all about the border and the north. | ||
So he's going to use brown people to punish us. | ||
Now, I thought brown people... | ||
We're these poor people from war zones that need to be embraced and taken in with open arms. | ||
And they're all individuals. And they all have their own destinies and their own lives. | ||
But this man sees them as a military division. | ||
As a legion. As a barrel of ammunition that he can use to enact his vengeance upon the Irish. | ||
Now you might say, Steph, this is your Irish blood talking. | ||
You're just mad at the English as usual. | ||
But I actually have receipts on this. | ||
You see, lots of states and bad actors utilize immigration in exactly this way, as if it's a weapon of warfare. | ||
Take, for example, the Russians, who are currently at war. | ||
At war in the East. | ||
And up on the top of Russia is Finland. | ||
Which is one of their primary borders and a country they've always had problems with. | ||
Even in World War II, the Finns were a big problem. | ||
Now in 2023, you can imagine the Russians were thinking, we don't want any problems from those Finns up north. | ||
So they began to do something to destable them. | ||
This is me reading from an article. | ||
Finland is closing all crossings on the Russian border after accusing Moscow of deliberately helping migrants into the country. | ||
Around 900 asylum seekers entered Finland from Russia in November, up from fewer than one a day on average. | ||
They come from countries including Morocco, Pakistan, and Syria. | ||
Finland is determined to put an end to these crossings, says the Prime Minister. | ||
The government says Russia is channeling asylum seekers towards Finland in what it calls an influence operation and a hybrid attack. | ||
And it has responded by progressively closing more and more border. | ||
I have a feeling that in this situation, Vladimir Putin didn't care too much about brown people either. | ||
And another example of this comes from an active war zone in Israel. | ||
Europe has had this big issue where there's been a lot of pro-Palestinian sentiment in Europe. | ||
There's been lots of huge anti-Zionist protests and lots of sentiment among the European elite that this war should not be prosecuted on Israel's behalf. | ||
And of course, understandably, if you're Israeli, why would you want this? | ||
You wouldn't want to punish people who take this attitude where you're not allowed to defend your nation. | ||
So Israel has suggested, very slyly, that the compassionate Europeans, places like Ireland as well, you know, who love Palestine so much, well, what they should do is they should take in all the Palestinians. | ||
What Israel will do is get them out of Gaza and send them to you, Europeans. | ||
If you love them so much, why don't you just take them all? | ||
Take all two million of them. | ||
We get confirmation of this from Haratz, where we read that both the coalition and opposition in Israel said transferring tens of thousands of Gazans to Europe is a moral imperative and an opportunity to demonstrate compassion towards the people of Gaza. | ||
And the far-right ministers were quick to express their support. | ||
Now, I have a feeling that the Israelis are not suggesting this because they have an enormous amount of compassion for brown people. | ||
No, I'm saying all this because it's important to become savvy to the nature of modern warfare. | ||
This is psychological warfare combined with hybrid or fifth dimensional warfare, as you heard the Finns mention. | ||
Which means that I'm no longer in the 21st century going to run up and get loads of tanks and show up in your country and be like, I'm here to fight you guys. | ||
Come on out and let's fight together. | ||
Nowadays, the way warfare happens is that you want to destabilize your enemy, psyop your enemy, confuse your enemy, ruin their brains. | ||
You want to go all Sun 2, Art of War on them before you actually fight them openly. | ||
And so in practice, if a bad actor or a state has a problem with somebody, they're going to do many things to try to destabilize that opposition. | ||
They will screw with their economy. | ||
They will put sanctions on them. | ||
Famously, the Europeans did this to the Russians. | ||
They will send in large amounts of migrants that the population are going to have to take on board and use their taxes to pay for them. | ||
God, it's awful when you think about it. | ||
Does anybody out here have compassion for the brown people? | ||
Are brown people just these little pawns that we move around on the chessboard as we try to attack our enemies? | ||
I think it would be fantastic for people in the West if they wised up and realised that this is how these guys who are calling the shots actually view these situations. | ||
It's not some compassionate decision. | ||
It's not some project of love. | ||
It's not somebody singing kumbaya. | ||
These guys are running massive state operations and they have their geopolitical enemies and their goals and these plans to transform the world in ways that they see fit to suit themselves. | ||
They see all these brown people as really useful tools in this project. | ||
They only want you to be compassionate and to be empathetic. | ||
This could not work unless their enemies had a problem with compassion and with empathy. | ||
How would the Russians pump Muslims into Finland unless the Finns had this quandary, this moral conundrum inside their heads saying, is it wrong or right to do this? | ||
Surely I have to be a good person here and just open up this border and let all these Russian agents in that are getting sent to my border. | ||
This is what they need to play on. | ||
You being a dummy who thinks that it rains pink flowers outside all day and the world is made of pillows. | ||
In the highly competitive world of states and global actors, they have realized that exploiting that very moral instinct inside of you is a great way for them to achieve their goals. | ||
And at that level, being nice and being fair and being honest doesn't matter at all. | ||
It's all about winning. | ||
Uber Boyo. | ||
Irish YouTuber. He's exactly right about everything he just said. | ||
And, of course, the people doing this have quizlings inside the gates. | ||
They've got operatives in our own government working to destabilize and undermine The native populations. | ||
We can go down to clip number six. | ||
Here's Representative Jamal Bowman fully supporting the importation of the millions of Palestinians to this country. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Should the United States bring in people from Gaza? | |
Well, we are a land of immigrants and we are a land of asylum seekers. | ||
Anyone escaping persecution and oppression and violence, the United States has always been an open home to those people. | ||
So whether they're coming from Palestine, Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, Mexico, Haiti, They're coming here to contribute to our economy, which 99.9% of them are. | ||
We've always been a place to open our doors to immigrants coming here. | ||
So yeah, fully support that and also fully support amnesty for the migrants who have been here for quite some time. | ||
Yeah, fully support that. | ||
Of course, the difference between the Palestinians and all the other groups you mentioned are that the Palestinians actually are. | ||
Facing eradication in their homelands and would actually qualify as refugees under that status. | ||
Still, I don't think we need to take them in after all. | ||
They wouldn't be refugees if it weren't for our supporting, funding, and providing cover for the people destroying them. | ||
So this is importing our own enemies in this regard in a very unambiguous way. | ||
We go to clip number 13 as well. | ||
As an immigration lawyer, I believe in Ireland, Who, of course, is benefiting from the increased and undesired importation of mass amounts of adult men from the third world, wants us to think that there's nothing we can do about any of this. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's go to clip 13. No control over what the British do between Great Britain and Ireland, and therefore the only other solution, and this will be able to face up to, we talk about we haven't been dealing with this or managing it, but as we know since the British are not going to do it on the Irish Sea, then the only option is for the Irish government, if people are calling to do something, to reintroduce cheques on the island of Ireland, which is never going to happen. | |
And so the question that has to be asked of everybody who complains about this issue of people travelling is, given that we've got no control over what a Tory government in an election year are going to do, Are we really suggesting that we should be introducing a hard border on this island? | ||
And if not, then I'm afraid that maybe we just have to accept this as a feature of life from now on. | ||
Immigration is just a feature of life from now on. | ||
Just from now on. | ||
This is just how it's going to go. | ||
Just Western countries are going to be subsumed under a wave of continuous immigration forever, and there's absolutely nothing we can do. | ||
That's what they want you to believe. | ||
They sincerely want you to believe that these policies by our governments are irreversible, unchangeable. | ||
They're making the choice. | ||
They're doing this on purpose. | ||
They've launched an attack against Western civilization that relies on you believing it's inevitable. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
I was going to move on from immigration, but I actually am going to stick with it for the time being. | ||
Because it is getting a lot of discussion these days with the term great replacement making its way into the wider American consciousness with the help of people like Elon Musk, Eva Vlardinger-Brooke. | ||
Bringing awareness to this. | ||
It's a policy. I mean, it's a UN replacement migration. | ||
It's been public since, I think, I want to say 2005 was when that UN policy paper was written. | ||
Replacement migration. | ||
Because, of course, the whole point of having a nation is to uphold the economy. | ||
The economy is the most important thing. | ||
It's not the people. Economy is not there to serve the people. | ||
The people are there to serve the economy. | ||
So if there's some sort of mismatch between the interests of the economy and the interests of the people, those in power tend to prioritize the economy over, you know, the people. | ||
From Oregon Live, published yesterday, the U.S. fertility rate just hit a record low. | ||
Here's why that matters. | ||
Americans are having fewer babies. | ||
According to a newly published article, Article from the Center of Disease Control and Prevention, 3.6 million babies were born in 2023, about 5.4 live births for every 1,000 women. | ||
Just think about that number alone. | ||
3.6 million babies were born in 2023. | ||
Now, we know that at least half that number, or at least double that number of illegal migrants crossed over the border in 2023. | ||
We talk about replacement migration. | ||
It's more than a replacement. | ||
Double the number of births have been imported in 2023. | ||
This number is down 2% from 2022 and the lowest it's been in over a century. | ||
Those who are having children are waiting longer to become parents. | ||
Per the report, the teen birth rate is at a record low of 13.2 births per 1,000 teens between 15 and 19. | ||
Birth rates were the highest for women's ages 30 through 34. | ||
The only age group with an increased birth rate were women 40 and over at 13 births for every 1,000 women, although this is still the lowest of every age group. | ||
The fertility rate has been trending down for years. | ||
There was a mini-baby boom during the pandemic, which some economists believe was due to the rise in remote work. | ||
Experts say numerous factors play into this overall decrease. | ||
So, lowest numbers in over a century, just in terms of total numbers of births, there's never been a time where the rate of births per 1,000 was lower than this. | ||
It's far, far lower than replacement rate. | ||
And the number of live births is less than half the number of immigrants coming over the border. | ||
unidentified
|
This is on purpose. | |
This is all on purpose. | ||
This is all by design. | ||
None of this is for your benefit. | ||
None of this is because it's good for you. | ||
It's actually explicitly because it's bad for you. | ||
And I want to go now to a montage from Lana from Red Ice TV. This is from all the way back in 2018, but it's as valid now as it ever was. | ||
Clip 26. Here's the real reason why immigrants are being brought in. | ||
It's the Great Replacement. | ||
unidentified
|
They put forth conspiracy theories with respect to white genocide and the Great Replacement. | |
The U.S. is experiencing great demographic shifts, and that is not playing well with a lot of white folks, and so they're putting forward this false narrative that there's a white genocide afoot. | ||
And it'll take a little bit of work to convince them that it's not true. | ||
Whites will not be the majority. | ||
I mean, it's an exciting transformation of the country. | ||
Among white supremacists, white nationalists, that is viewed as a horrific event. | ||
In a couple of presidential cycles, you'll be on election night. | ||
You'll be announcing that we're calling the 38 electoral votes of Texas for the Democratic nominee for president. | ||
It's changing. It's going to become a purple state and then a blue state because of the demographics. | ||
The demographics of America are not on the side of the Republican Party. | ||
The new voters in this country are moving away from them. | ||
Brown people and black people and Muslims and immigrants are coming to replace our white civilization, and the Jews' job is basically to pass as a white person, but in fact do the bidding of these people. | ||
And so when you have someone like Congressman Steve King saying, we can't replace our civilization with someone else's babies, like, what does that mean? | ||
What is that idea? The Jewish connection to the refugee An unrelenting stream of immigration. | ||
Non-stop. | ||
Non-stop. | ||
Folks like me who are Caucasian of European descent for the first time in 2017 will be in an absolute minority. | ||
Fewer than 50% of the people in America from then and on will be white European stock. | ||
That's not a bad thing. | ||
That's a source of our strength. | ||
unidentified
|
Immigration is the future. | |
You cannot work and live in a globalized world, in the middle of the world, in Europe, Without immigration and moving populations. | ||
The history of Europe with this long history of nationalism and small countries is now getting into a crisis. | ||
They are not anymore only white or only Swedish or only Portuguese or only German. | ||
They are multicultural. | ||
Ideas like the Great Replacement, which It's the perfect marriage, really, between Islamophobic racism, anti-Semitism and white nationalism, because the theory goes that there is a sort of Zionist conspiracy to Breed out white people. | ||
The white British population has decreased by 600,000, while the minority population has increased by 1.2 million. | ||
So, yes lads, we're winning. | ||
The core ideology of white nationalists, which is a euphemism for white supremacists, there are different types, but the core ideology is the belief in the imminent extinction of the white race because of a flood of non-white people, all orchestrated Puppeteered by Jews. | ||
It's a new island. It is though. | ||
It is a new island. It's a new island of new different diversities, multicultural people, Filipinos, Spanish, Africans, mixed people. | ||
I met a girl the other day and I was like, where you from? | ||
She goes, me man's from China and me dad is from Africa. | ||
I'm like, whoa! Ireland is unique now. | ||
We're mixed. There's going to be Barack Obama's walking around, Beyonce's and oh, different, different sorts. | ||
Mixture of people. So the whites are going extinct here now. | ||
So we're taking over. | ||
Well, Ana, his statement makes me sick. | ||
On a personal level, preserving our heritage, reclaiming our heritage, that sounds a lot like a certain leader that killed members of my family and about six million other Jews in the 1940s. | ||
He pretends that there are massive flows of illegal immigrants coming over our borders. | ||
He sounds a lot like despotic leaders that have talked about white heritage and white nationalism around the world and pretending that there are Foreign people trying to influence our country in a way that just isn't accurate. | ||
Europe, it's not white. | ||
Europe, it's not a white man also. | ||
And there is no democracy in Europe without black women on stage like that. | ||
Thank you. There is no equality without the voices of ethnic minorities in Europe. | ||
Equality is not enough. | ||
We need social justice in Europe. | ||
Thank you. Look, to be totally honest, if things are so bad, as you say with the white working class, don't you want to get new Americans in who aren't going to be lazy, spoiled, whatever? | ||
And then you, luckily, you have these waves of people coming in from Mexico who really want to work hard and really want to succeed. | ||
The real craziness comes, if you like, from rural... | ||
White Americans who feel that they're losing their country. | ||
This montage is from Red Ice TV all the way back in 2018. | ||
It's an attack, folks. It's not complicated. | ||
It's an attack. You can defend yourself. | ||
All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
Final segment of The American Journal. | ||
unidentified
|
I got quite a video to play for you here. | |
And this, of course, has to do with yet another issue that plagues us in America that just... | ||
Incredibly simple to solve. | ||
And if our authorities felt like doing something for the benefit of America, it would be not a difficult thing for them to achieve. | ||
That is crime. | ||
That is the relentless wave of crime that is destroying this nation. | ||
You know, one person that, now that I'm thinking about it, I'll just mention it here, at the VDR conference this weekend, John Lott. | ||
He's a researcher, a compiler of information, talking about the way that the crime rates are manipulated in order to give people false impression of falling crime, when in fact, the reality is that cities just aren't reporting their crime to the databases. | ||
It's like that video we played. | ||
The guy's playing pool. | ||
He says, you know, you can decrease crime by just not arresting people. | ||
You know, you can just not call it a crime and then the crime numbers go down. | ||
And that's what's happening across the United States these days. | ||
They say crime is down. | ||
When in reality, either what they mean is that the rate of crime increasing has slowed or that Crime basically isn't being reported because people understand that the criminals won't face justice, so they don't bother to go through the process of reporting a crime. | ||
I'm one of those people. | ||
I guess I'm part of the problem. | ||
When my car was broken into and stuff stolen out of it, I didn't report it because I know nothing's going to happen. | ||
I'm not going to investigate it. | ||
I'm not going to get my stuff back. | ||
So, you know, what's the purpose? | ||
What's the point? And when police understand that they have to go through, first of all, the danger of arresting somebody who might resist you violently, and then all the paperwork that's involved in trying to process it, and to go through all of that work only to have it thrown out by the DA, they would just rather not do it, rather not participate in it. | ||
So crime is still very much on the rise in America. | ||
It's just that reality is disguised by the manipulation of the numbers. | ||
A growing share of Americans say reducing crime should be a top priority for the president and Congress to address this year from PewResearch.org. | ||
Around 6 in 10 U.S. adults, 58 percent, hold that view today, up from 47 percent at the beginning of Joe Biden's presidency in 2021. | ||
With the issue likely to come up in this year's presidential election, here's what we know about crime in the United States. | ||
There's two primary sources of government statistics, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Bureau of Justice Statistics. | ||
They paint an incomplete picture. | ||
The FBI publishes annual data on crimes that have been reported to law enforcement, but not crimes that have not been reported. | ||
Historically, the FBI has only published statistics about a handful of specific violent and property crimes, but not many of the other types of crimes, such as drug crime. | ||
While the FBI's data is based on information from thousands of federal, state, county, city, and other police departments, not all law enforcement agencies participate every year. | ||
In 2022, the most recent full year with available statistics, the FBI received data from just 83 percent of participating agencies. | ||
And some of the biggest cities in the country stopped reporting, including L.A. and New York. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
The BJS instead interviews crime victims. | ||
It sends out surveys and says, have you been a victim of a crime? | ||
And then asks, you know, did you report it? | ||
Property crime in the U.S. is much more common than violent crime. | ||
In 2022, the FBI reported a total of 2,000 property crimes per 100,000 people, compared with 380 violent crimes per 100,000 people, which is still incredibly high. | ||
By far the most common form of property crime in 2023 was larceny or theft, followed by motor vehicle theft and burglary among violent crimes. | ||
Aggravated assault was the most common offense, followed by robbery, rape, and murder or non-negligent manslaughter. | ||
BJS tracks a slightly different set of offenses from the FBI, but it finds the same overall patterns with theft, the most common form of property crime in 2022. | ||
And it, yeah, is all going up. | ||
Apparently it's plunged since the 1980s, but around 2020, most of those trends inverted. | ||
In 2020, the U.S. murder rate saw its largest single-year increase on record. | ||
By 2022, it remained considerably higher than it was before the coronavirus pandemic. | ||
As if that's what caused the uptick. | ||
Yeah, it was the Black Lives Matter rallies, actually. | ||
The Black Lives Matter riots. | ||
It was the policies pursued by Black Lives Matter to make us less safe and to allow crime to... | ||
Spiral out of control. These things, again, are on purpose, by design. | ||
And one of the ways you can tell that is the case is because presidents like Naya Bukele, countries like El Salvador, have cracked down on crime, been hugely successful in doing so, and received hatred and dismissal from the mainstream media here in the United States. | ||
They actually cared about solving the problems that they cause. | ||
They would be embracing Bukele's policy of crime. | ||
Instead, they are attempting to portray it as tyrannical and despotic and dangerous because they like the crime. | ||
I mean, it's on purpose. It's very easy to establish. | ||
It's on purpose, obviously. Naya Bukele has gone even farther now, and this video has gone pretty viral this morning. | ||
Clip 21 is president of El Salvador, Naya Bukele. | ||
He gathered every single official in his executive branch to make a surprise announcement. | ||
And yet again, we're faced with something that might seem like a out of reach fantasy until you realize it's not just possible, but actually happening in certain places. we're faced with something that might seem like a out Thank you. | ||
A border wall seems like a fantasy that we can never achieve because of the way it's presented in the military media. | ||
So you look at Israel and you're like, oh, they have a giant, super effective wall that was built cheaply and with American taxpayer money. | ||
So we could do that here, we just don't. | ||
And in the case of El Salvador, now look, we have a non-criminal executive branch actually doing things for the sake of the El Salvadorian people and going so far as to put his own Legacy and administration on the line to preserve their legality. | ||
You'll see what I mean. Clip number 21 here, Nia Bukele, and I'll read along with the subtitles. | ||
He says, in fact, you can see that everyone here is from the executive branch. | ||
From the executive branch that I oversee. | ||
unidentified
|
Except for one person, the Attorney General. | |
He's not a part of the executive branch, but he's here for a simple reason. | ||
I want to ask him publicly to investigate everyone sitting here. | ||
Retroactively and into the future. | ||
I imagine there should be no problem with that. | ||
unidentified
|
Someone once asked me, are you afraid of death? | |
I said, of course, nobody wants to die. | ||
unidentified
|
I don't want to die. | |
But I know that I'll die one day. | ||
unidentified
|
Like anyone else, death is one thing we can't escape. | |
A hundred years from now, None of us here will still be alive. | ||
None of us. Nobody's sitting here. | ||
It's very likely that nobody here knows their grandfather's father's name. | ||
unidentified
|
But if there's one thing I fear, it's leaving a bad legacy. | |
There are some presidents, some in prison, some on the run. | ||
unidentified
|
But most are remembered as criminals. | |
That's not how I want to be remembered. | ||
So I don't steal. | ||
unidentified
|
Because I don't want to be remembered as a criminal or as corrupt. | |
But for one president, President Duarte, people back then used to say, the president isn't a thief, but he surrounded himself with thieves. | ||
There was a time when he offered hope for the Salvadorian people. | ||
But even if it's true he didn't steal, he was foolish because he was the people's hope. | ||
He didn't touch a cent and still stained his legacy by surrounding himself with thieves. | ||
That won't happen to me. | ||
I won't be the president that didn't steal but was surrounded by criminals. | ||
I want to be remembered as the president who didn't steal and didn't let anybody else steal either. | ||
And the one who put whoever stole in prison. | ||
There are a couple who are already there. | ||
So he calls his entire executive branch into an office and says, every one of you is now under investigation by the Attorney General, preemptively. | ||
Is it a fantasy to want that here? | ||
I guess so. | ||
But it's possible. Solve all of these problems. | ||
It's a choice they're making to not just not solve them, but to exacerbate and facilitate them. | ||
Stay tuned, folks. Alex Jones, 90 seconds. | ||
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
Infowars.com forward slash show. | ||
We take some brain force and then we'll do this commercial. | ||
How about that? Mmm, I can think again. | ||
This is the liquid tincture version of Brain Force, which means you can really tailor it to exactly what you need. | ||
I tend to take maybe a little bit more than is directed, but it's incredibly powerful stuff and I have an incredibly demanding job, but you make it easy by going to InfoWarsStore.com and of course InfoWarsStore.com makes it easy by supplying me with Brain Force Ultra. | ||
I rely on this product to do my job on a daily basis because it's absolutely jam-packed with incredible ingredients Brain Force Ultra is now back in stock at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
And get it now because this stuff sells out fast for very good reason. | ||
It's a fantastic supplement. | ||
It's the type of supplement that once you start taking it, well, you're going to notice if you stop. | ||
Go check out what's in Brain Force Ultra. | ||
Do your own research. And what you'll find is that this is a powerhouse formula for incredible mental clarity, focus, and energy. | ||
Now on sale at Infowarsstore.com. |