Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| What we've tried to do over the years is to use the expertise, the resources, to allow us to respond better to a deliberate to allow us to respond better to a deliberate affront or attack on us with a microbe of any type, engineered or what have you. | ||
| To use that knowledge to better prepare us for what we know will happen. | ||
| Instead of looking at it in two separate silos of biodefense for biological threats that are deliberate and countermeasures for naturally occurring, you should essentially pool the science so that you could do both. | ||
| At least 15 federal agencies knew that gain-of-function research was being done in the Wuhan lab since, what, 2018? | ||
| We've gotten all of our information from Whistleblower, but we now know it wasn't just one agency that China was approaching. | ||
| China made a presentation, or an American representative, Peter Deczak, made a representation to 15 agencies about creating a virus that, guess what? | ||
| Looks suspiciously like COVID-19 and looks like no other virus in nature from that family. | ||
| They were working on this and presented it to 15 agencies. | ||
| And in 2020, when they saw COVID-19, they should have all been calling and raising the alarm and saying, my goodness, we saw this two years ago. | ||
| We knew the Chinese were doing this. | ||
| Lo and behold, they did it. | ||
| A brave Marine, a lieutenant colonel, came forward and gave us that information, or today we would still not know any of this. | ||
| The great COVID cover-up, shocking truth about Wuhan and 16 federal agencies. | ||
| Yeah, Senator, they were lying. | ||
| And the lying had real consequences for children, their mental health, their education, for business, for our faith, not being able to go to houses of worship. | ||
| I mean, that's fundamental American freedoms. | ||
| And I'll ask you again, what should the consequences be for Anthony Fauci? | ||
| Jail. You know, I've sent two referrals to the Department of Justice. | ||
| I think he lied to Congress, which is a felony. | ||
| Anthony Fauci did lie to Congress. | ||
| We know that from his own words. | ||
| Not because I say he lies, but his private emails say he was lying. | ||
| Virtually everything he said in private contradicted what he was saying in public. | ||
| And he was fairly honest in private. | ||
| In private, he said masks don't work. | ||
| In public, he wore three masks. | ||
| In private, he admitted that there was such a thing as natural immunity gained from getting the infection. | ||
| In public, he was like, you know, we're not gonna measure that. | ||
| It's unpredictable. And what are they talking about? | ||
| They're talking about this. | ||
| The New York Post is finally covering it. | ||
| Three years ago, a lot of these emails were already public, but now even more emails are public. | ||
| Whistleblower shares more COVID origin emails Fauci advisor allegedly concealed on private account House panel. | ||
| We had emails in late 2020, so over three years ago, we've covered it ad nauseum, from the EcoHealth Alliance. | ||
| And a lot of that is because what Dr. | ||
| Huff, who was the vice president of it, Was giving it to Tom Renz and others, and later testified to Congress and others, that they were developing COVID-19 for the CIA and the Defense Department, and they were developing the vaccine before they ever released COVID. And Fauci was calling it gain of function. | ||
| Well now, all these other incredible emails have come out. | ||
| It was premeditated. It was launched against the people. | ||
| Life expectancy is dropping. | ||
| Cancer is exploding. We have a 40 plus percent increase in the overall morbidity rate. | ||
| World population is now dropping for the first time since the Black Plague. | ||
| They have now launched this attack. | ||
| And if it doesn't get exposed fully, If people aren't brought to justice, they've now beta tested, launching an even more deadly virus, an even more deadly injection in the future. | ||
| This is a test to see if they can depopulate. | ||
| These shots ordered the body to mass-produce the HIV spike protein. | ||
| We knew in January of 2020 because the Indian major university, the CRISPR gene editing system, and they scanned the damn virus and said it was from five viruses man-made. | ||
| And then later, it was confirmed by all these other governments and institutions. | ||
| In the literature, it is a fact. | ||
| In peer-reviewed studies, it's man-made. | ||
| It is a fact it's got a big rhino horn on it. | ||
| The biggest spike protein ever seen is HIV. That literally goes and plugs into the cell with a big spike. | ||
| You're literally looking in that movie of what they're describing as an alien attacking of an HIV virus. | ||
| So that's the spike protein, folks. | ||
| And it's very, very, very frustrating to sit here and watch all this unfolding. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Thursday, April 18th in the year of our Lord, 2024. | |
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Very big show we have for you today. | ||
| We'll be joined by Mike Shelby a little bit later. | ||
| Talk about some preparedness. | ||
| Precautions you can be taking in your own life. | ||
| We have bombshell information from Seymour Hersh about the Iran-Israel conflict. | ||
| We got lots of videos of Joe Biden. | ||
| He's hitting the campaign trail, which to us is like the circus is in town. | ||
| It's like we get an endless stream of entertainment. | ||
| So we'll be showing you a collection of Biden's I guess you can call them gaffs. | ||
| I guess you could call them gaffs. | ||
| Oh, look at this. I shouldn't show this yet. | ||
| We haven't covered it. | ||
| I'll use my hand. Even Time Magazine, even the globalist rag Time Magazine has got Joe Biden stuck in the mud on his bike. | ||
| Funny, it's actually... | ||
| This cartoon of Biden stuck in the mud on his bike is actually less pathetic than the real deal. | ||
| He should be lying in the mud. | ||
| He should be trying to bike through the mud, failing, and then lying like a squid in the mud. | ||
| So we'll show you some videos of him. | ||
| Does anyone think that Biden can stand up on his bike? | ||
| Yeah, I know. | ||
| Yeah, and they gave him the body of a 90-year-old, which is far too generous. | ||
| The body of a 100-year-old, the mind of a 1,000-year-old. | ||
| It really is something to behold, and we will behold it. | ||
| Behold it we shall. | ||
| Stay tuned for some videos of that, but let's begin today as we do every day with your daily dispatch All right, here it is folks your daily dispatch for Thursday the 18th of April 2021 A very bizarre situation yesterday with widespread 911 outages reported across four far-flung states. | ||
| A large-scale outage on Wednesday affected residents' ability to call the 911 emergency number in part of Nebraska and Texas, the entire state of South Dakota and Las Vegas, according to local authorities. | ||
| In Las Vegas, calls to 911 on landline phones and mobile phones were not connecting for about two hours before service was restored. | ||
| At about 9 p.m., the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department said on social media. | ||
| During the outage, dispatchers could see attempts to make calls from mobile phones and would call residents back, the police said, and all attempted calls had been answered. | ||
| The outage also affected southern Nevada, the Nevada State Police said. | ||
| They were reported basically all over the place, and there was very little... | ||
| immediately clear what had caused the outage. | ||
| In February, a widespread AT&T outage temporarily cut off connections for users across the United States for many hours, leaving FirstNet, the emergency communications network, out of service. | ||
| Police forces like the New York Police Department were unable to make calls or send emails. | ||
| There's also been a series of outages of weather radar systems over the last little while. | ||
| And of course, if you take the leftist strategy of statistical Goal. | ||
| You know, reading of reality, yesterday evening, Joe Biden presided over the lowest crime rate in these four states in all of history. | ||
| Because after all, if a crime isn't punished, is it really a crime? | ||
| If somebody steals from you, but the cops never come and the report is never filed, that means it never happened and the crime rate remains at zero. | ||
| So congratulations to Joe Biden for solving America's crime problem by downing the 911 system. | ||
| Of course, And a very interesting and, I guess, extremely coincidental series of events mere hours before the widespread 911 outages across four states. | ||
| DHS issued a warning, emergency services a likely target for cyber attacks. | ||
| Ransom attacks in particular threaten to disrupt services. | ||
| Emergency services, like others, are also viewed as ripe targets for criminally minded cyber attackers going to a new federal assessment, and any vulnerability in those critical networks can expose victims to a multitude of dangerous ripple effects. | ||
| The analysis compiled by the Department of Homeland Security and obtained by ABC News outlines concerns that the emergency service sector can be exploited and mined for sensitive data, in turn hampering medical and law enforcement services and posing an ongoing threat to personal information and public safety. | ||
| So DHS issues a warning that emergency services may be targeted by cyber attack mere hours before widespread 911 outages are reported across four states in the union. | ||
| Four states from all over. | ||
| And there were outages reported in Florida and a few other states as well. | ||
| So still don't have any clear explanation as to what this was. | ||
| But could have been a cyber attack, could have been a testing phase. | ||
| We're not exactly sure. | ||
| But we'll take your calls on that topic a little bit later. | ||
| Meanwhile, Trump to return to court for third day of jury selection and hush money trial. | ||
| Seven people have been picked from the vast jury pool. | ||
| Five more jurors and six alternates remain to be chosen for the historic trial. | ||
| He's returning to that New York courtroom on Thursday for the third day of the hush money trial and a continuation of the process of jury selection in one of the most high-profile criminal cases in U.S. history. | ||
| One of the lowest stakes, highest-profile criminal cases ever. | ||
| The man mislabeled an expense report to a lawyer. | ||
| It's the trial of the century. | ||
| Yeah, we'll get into that a little bit more as well. | ||
| And we'll dig a little bit more into the Supreme Court case arguments that are being made right now about January 6th and a decision that may have reverberations across the entire judicial landscape, in particular when it comes to Donald Trump. | ||
| We talked a little bit about it yesterday, but we'll get more into that today. | ||
| Meanwhile, Israel's chief says it will respond to Iran's missile strike. | ||
| Israel's military chief said Monday that his country will respond to Iran's weakened attack. | ||
| But he did not elaborate on when or how as world leaders urged against retaliation trying to avoid a spiral of violence in the Middle East. | ||
| The Iranian attack on Saturday came in response to a suspected Israeli strike two weeks earlier on an Iranian consular building in the Syrian capital of Damascus that killed two Iranian generals. | ||
| time Iran launched a direct military assault on Israel despite decades of enmity dating back to the country's 1979 Islamic revolution. | ||
| That's funny. | ||
| Is that when it dates back to? | ||
| Is that when it dates back to or does it actually date back to 1953 and the overthrow of the Iranian government by the American CIA and the imposition of the Shah? | ||
| I wonder, I guess it's a matter of perspective when you start the timeline. | ||
| But again, we'll get into a very, very interesting story from Seymour Hersh on this topic in just a little bit. | ||
| No, not finally. | ||
| Next we have this. U.S. Air Force Secretary admits less than a third of Lockheed's F-35s are operationally capable. | ||
| Matt Gaetz says the Pentagon has given too much power to the defense contractors that are bilking American taxpayers. | ||
| A third of U.S. military's F-35 fighter jets manufactured by Lockheed Martin are currently inoperable, the U.S. Air Force Secretary admitted on Wednesday. | ||
| That's... Frankly shocking, and we will get into that as well, talking about not just the failure to uphold basic military readiness in this ever-increasingly dangerous geopolitical landscape, but also the way that basically military contracts are just blank checks for evil people, and they get to more or less print money, except I'm saying that metaphorically. | ||
| Obviously, the money is yours. | ||
| It's actually money. It's yours. | ||
| And they take it from you. They also print it. | ||
| So they're doing both. | ||
| Finally, we have this. | ||
| Senate rejects all impeachment charges against DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. | ||
| The Senate voted along party lines Wednesday to dismiss all impeachment charges House Republicans brought against Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. | ||
| The Democrat-led Senate voted 51-49 to adjourn the impeachment trial over DHS chief's refusal to execute his duties to secure an open border. | ||
| The Democrats were, of course, joined in this by Mitch McConnell and other RINO Republicans who refused to do absolutely anything to secure our border or in any way mitigate the damage caused by these treasonous actors in our federal government. | ||
| It is sickening, but that's the reality. | ||
| And we can get more into that a little bit later as well. | ||
| I do want to remind you... That InfoWarsStore.com is where we get all of our funding from you, the American people. | ||
| Vitamin Mineral Fusion is back in stock and 40% off. | ||
| Vitamin C, D, E, and B12. It's got your calcium, your magnesium, your zinc, selenium, L-glutamine, CoQ10, and many more vital nutrients all in one scoop of Vitamin Mineral Fusion, a delicious tropical fruit flavor that makes plain water into a superfood. | ||
| And it really is a fantastic product. | ||
| I've seen pictures of people with entire closets full of vitamin-mineral fusion because it's just that good. | ||
| And they know how quickly it sells out. | ||
| So they stock up, buying literally hundreds of them just to make sure they have them forever. | ||
| So, I suggest you do that. | ||
| I suggest you buy as many as you have storage for. | ||
| But regardless, you should be trying it, and we really do appreciate your support at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| It's the only way that we get funding, and we provide 10-plus hours of free content a day. | ||
| We're only able to do that because you go to Infowarsstore.com, and we encourage everybody listening to at least give it a try. | ||
| Just 1% of you would take that suggestion and I wouldn't have to ask anymore. | ||
| Wouldn't that be nice? Wouldn't that be a pleasant development? | ||
| Now, we're going to talk about Joe Biden on the campaign trail now. | ||
| Because, good Lord. Because, my goodness. | ||
| Because this man is just a walking cartoon SNL sketch. | ||
| We have so many clips just from yesterday. | ||
| And it really is incredible. | ||
| I guess we'll start with a little compare and contrast. | ||
| I didn't drop the video in, but if the crew can pull up the visit that Trump... | ||
| Made to a bodega in New York City. | ||
| It's in, was it in Harlem or something? | ||
| I don't know, he visits some bodega in New York City and there's a massive crowd pressing up against the barriers, chanting, we love Trump. | ||
| They're desperate just to get a side of him. | ||
| And if we can bring up just the visuals of that video, because I want to compare that to Welcome to my show! | ||
| Didn't quite happen that way. | ||
| Didn't quite happen that way. | ||
| We'll go now to clip number six. | ||
| Biden stopped by a Sheetz gas station trying to emulate Trump's bodega visit. | ||
| Here's how that went. Oh no, he spotted the children. | ||
| You see his face light up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, children. You got a little wave there. | |
| A couple people sort of standing around. | ||
| Girl wearing what looks like a Make America Great Again hat. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Nice camera there that makes it look staged. | |
| All very staged. | ||
| We're pushing this guy back. | ||
| Back, please, back. | ||
| Please don't crowd the president. | ||
| There's like two people just literally just eating hot dogs and worrying about what's going on. | ||
| Oh, this poor old man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This poor old man. | |
| Somebody should take him to a bank and try to get a loan. | ||
| So, yeah, not quite the arousing success. | ||
| Oh, good lord, he's going behind the counter. | ||
| Are there children back there? | ||
| Yeah, not exactly the thrilling, chanting swarms of people eager just to get a side of him. | ||
| Yeah, not so much. Nobody's even taking a picture except for his handlers there. | ||
| How much you want to bet the dudes that work at this gas station posted this picture like, look at this idiot! | ||
| How much you want to bet the guys working at the gas station probably having to work incredibly hard and just put food on their table, aren't so thrilled about meeting the man who has presided over their economic strife. | ||
| So we can go ahead and pull that one down. | ||
| Very exciting stuff. Well done, Biden. | ||
| You're beloved, clearly. | ||
| Also, he looks really unsure of where he was or what he was doing there. | ||
| At the end, it's like, you know, Trump's at least got a degree of charisma where he's outside the bodega, he's smiling, he's waving to people, you know. | ||
| Joe, at the end there, if we back up that video and we see Joe, like, he's got, like, what? | ||
| Like, eight seconds here of just... | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| What? What? | ||
| What is going on? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where am I? Gotta change my diaper. | |
| Everybody else is sort of wandering around. | ||
| Most people there are his handlers, people from the White House. | ||
| Oh yeah, there's a video of him walking with children. | ||
| They're all having to walk really slowly. | ||
| They're all like purposefully just barely walking. | ||
| Very funny stuff. | ||
| Very comedic. Clip number one is Joe Biden giving a speech where he pretends to be outraged at the fact that everybody hates him. | ||
| Well, he's not really outraged at everybody. | ||
| He hates him, he's outraged at the language that's used, the language these people are using, which is so funny. | ||
| Again, these people, I mean, they do it over and over with Trump, where like, yeah, Trump's a little brash, Trump's a little, you know, he changed the way that politicians talk in a lot of ways, right? | ||
| Right. Only Rosie O'Donnell, right? | ||
| These little things where it broke some of the mold of the upright, respectable politician, the way they talked in just a very real and forthright fashion. | ||
| And then this infuriates the left so much. | ||
| The left is so triggered by Donald Trump that they just go completely insane and I don't have to tell you how many videos we've seen of like little kids being trained to say F Trump or whatever. | ||
| And it's like so, I mean Trump sort of raised the temperature of politics overall. | ||
| He sort of injected an energy into it. | ||
| That was a little bit raucous, a little bit rambunctious. | ||
| But he was never like way out of line. | ||
| In a, you know, egregious sort of way. | ||
| And, you know, while his followers sort of poke fun at you and not take your offense seriously, it's the left that is just happy to insult, death threat, curse. | ||
| I mean, they're the ones who have really changed the rhetorical landscape in response to Trump, but they blame Trump for that. | ||
| Right? Kind of like how they... | ||
| They're like, oh, Trump is such a threat to democracy. | ||
| Why? Well, because we were so scared of Trump that we had to destroy democracy. | ||
| Basically, their reaction is the thing that's bad, but they blame it on Trump because... | ||
| Trump triggered them. So it's his fault when they behave badly or when they change the culture of America in response to Trump. | ||
| It's Trump's fault for simply existing. | ||
| So that's what's happening here. | ||
| Clip number one is Joe Biden very angry that everybody hates him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. I've never thought I'd see a time when I'm going through a No, because you made that up. | |
| I don't believe you. | ||
| I really don't. | ||
| Yeah, F Joe Biden was like a natural thing that people just started chanting when gathered in large groups. | ||
| It was like a spontaneous spiritual alignment of all of America coming together to say, F you Joe Biden, we all hate you. | ||
| And then of course, when that happened at a sporting event, the announcer tried to cover it up by saying, let's go Brandon. | ||
| So then that became a code way of saying, F Joe Biden. | ||
| But I've never seen seven- and eight-year-olds being told by their parents to flick off the camera or standing by a sign holding up their middle finger. | ||
| That doesn't really happen. | ||
| It happens on the left. The left does stuff like that all the time. | ||
| There are lots of videos of that happening. | ||
| It doesn't really happen on the right very much. | ||
| So he's lying and projecting and blaming Trump for what the left does. | ||
| Okay, so he's wandering around gas stations lost and ignored. | ||
| He's lying about children being trained to, you know, act uncouth, unruly, which, again, it's like it's just so hypocritical. | ||
| The left does this. | ||
| I mean, there have been, like, productions that have done this where they have little kid actors saying things like that, and it's not even like a one-off thing. | ||
| This is one of the things they do, and the right finds... | ||
| Actually very distasteful and typical of the left. | ||
| The right doesn't really do that. So he's lying and projecting. | ||
| He's wandering lost around the gas station. | ||
| He's also making up more stories about his past. | ||
| As we know, Joe Biden grew up in a... | ||
| Puerto Rican neighborhood going to black Baptist churches, raised by his Haitian nanny, when in reality he was raised in a neighborhood that was 99.999 white, and all of his background are ridiculous lies. | ||
| So he's come up with a new one, this time about his uncle, and even the mainstream media is writing articles saying, yeah, he didn't quite get that right. | ||
| But let's watch. Clip number five, sorry. | ||
| Clip number five, Biden, those darn cannibals. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. I'm going to call him Uncle Bozy. | |
| He was in a shot down. | ||
| He was in the Army Air Corps before there was an Air Force. | ||
| He flew single-engine planes, reconnaissance flights over New Guinea. | ||
| He had volunteered because someone couldn't make it. | ||
| He got shot down in an area where there were So he says his uncle, before there was an Air Force, his plane got shot down in an area where there were a bunch of cannibals. | ||
| What a thrilling and fake story. | ||
| Can I make a prediction? Yeah. | ||
| I feel like Biden, he's so senile, he's gonna drop the n-bomb on his campaign. | ||
| I mean, just based on the way I've seen him talk before in the past, with his racist busing. | ||
| He's actually dropped the N-bomb, right? | ||
| I think we've got that video. | ||
| I mean, I'm not going to put us on the spot right now, but we have the documents. | ||
| Yeah, I think it was during the Clarence Thomas hearing and stuff. | ||
| Yeah, he's going to drop the N-bomb on the campaign trail, just not knowing where he's at. | ||
| And he's going to be slain. | ||
| You know, it might boost his polls a little bit. | ||
| That's all I'm saying. And of course, the way the mainstream media covers this is just very typical. | ||
| The way this should be reported is Joe Biden makes up yet another story about his background. | ||
| Add this to the litany of tall tales that Joe Biden has told about his and his family's life. | ||
| I would love to see a biography based on his statements about his life, not on research. | ||
| Just take Joe Biden's word for it and try to come up with a timeline for It would be chaos because he lies so continuously over and over about sort of the same thing a lot of times. | ||
| He literally is given speeches. | ||
| We've shown the compilation. | ||
| InfoWars put out a compilation last week where he's saying, I grew up in a neighborhood. | ||
| I felt bad I didn't have an A on my last name because there are so many Italians. | ||
| And then later he's like, because I didn't have a... | ||
| Z on the end of my name, because I grew up in a Polish neighborhood. | ||
| And it's like, that's exactly the same story, but just with a different ethnic group. | ||
| Why are you lying like this? | ||
| And why doesn't the media care? | ||
| So, I mean, the way this should have been reported is Joe Biden makes up weird story about his uncle being eaten by cannibals that never happened. | ||
| Instead, it's Biden is off on details of his uncle's World War II death as he calls Trump unfit to lead the military. | ||
| He's misstated key details about his Trump, about his uncle's death in World War II as he honored the man's wartime service. | ||
| And Donald Trump was unworthy of serving as commander in chief. | ||
| Like they can't, they can't even just say he's lying. | ||
| They have to couch it as if, like, yeah, he misstated some details. | ||
| You mean he lied? | ||
| You mean he lied about that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| You didn't think we were done, did you? | ||
| You didn't think we'd shown you all of the videos from yesterday of Joe Biden being an embarrassing mess? | ||
| No, no, no. It takes far more than one segment to cover 24 hours worth of Joe Biden's idiocy. | ||
| And we're going to do it. | ||
| We're going to keep covering it. | ||
| We're going to go now to clip number 19, where Biden is showing his geopolitical chops here. | ||
| Of course, he doesn't get the words quite right, and he ends up telling Israel not to attack Israel, but that's fine. | ||
| He's just the commander-in-chief. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 19 now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And I made it clear to Israelis, don't move on Haifa. | |
| It's just not, I mean, anyway, I just, look what we did recently when Israel was attacked. | ||
| Yeah. So Haifa is in Israel. | ||
| I can almost imagine the Israeli corresponding figure in Israel. | ||
| I told him very clearly, don't attack Haifa. | ||
| And they're like, okay, sure. | ||
| We promise we won't. | ||
| Yeah. Did he mean Rafa? | ||
| He probably meant Rafa. | ||
| That's right. He didn't really mean it at all. | ||
| He just had no ability to tell the Israelis what to do. | ||
| That's been proven time and time again in the last six months. | ||
| Although we'll get to an interesting development in that. | ||
| The development being that the Biden administration itself is largely unconnected to the moves that the U.S. military is making. | ||
| I mean, for one thing, Biden's senility is not getting in the way, but it also means that the elected representative commander-in-chief is actually not involved in the decision-making process of the army, meaning that we're not a republic anymore. | ||
| So a couple interesting angles of that development. | ||
| We'll cover it in just a minute. | ||
| Finally, I want to go to clip 11 here. | ||
| I saved this one for last, because while this one is kind of funny, and again based on a lie, It's also a little bit terrifying. | ||
| I think it gives you a really good insight into Joe Biden's character. | ||
| And we've seen it over and over. | ||
| The fact that when he gets mad, it's kind of legitimately scary. | ||
| And I think this is a tactic that a lot of people in power use. | ||
| It's an effective one where you're kind of soft-spoken and You seem really understanding, but when somebody messes up, you just become vicious and mean. | ||
| And people have like a visceral reaction to that. | ||
| There's almost like a fight or flight thing that gets activated when somebody's yelling at you in a way that actually makes you fear for your physical safety. | ||
| You'll see that in this clip. | ||
| And of course what he's yelling about didn't actually exist. | ||
| So there's that angle to it. | ||
| That he's getting this mad over a delusion. | ||
| Which is kind of scary in and of itself. | ||
| But just to recap here. | ||
| So far he's wandered aimlessly around a gas station being ignored by everybody in town. | ||
| He lied about his uncle being eaten by cannibals. | ||
| Which there's just absolutely no proof or evidence for that whatsoever. | ||
| He is... He told Israel not to attack Israel. | ||
| And he's very offended that there are signs in every rural community saying F Joe Biden. | ||
| Because how dare you disapprove of him? | ||
| Now let's go to clip number 11. Joe is going to talk about Trump calling American servicemen losers and suckers. | ||
| And this comes from a 2020 article from The Atlantic that quoted anonymous sources claiming that Trump called dead American soldiers losers. | ||
| Now, obviously, people were primed to believe this because of Trump's commentary about John McCain during the campaign, which is a little bit different. | ||
| It's a little bit different. When you're talking about the warmonger extraordinaire, John McCain, who was his political rival at the time and was a vicious, underhanded skis bag, when you're talking about him and during the presidential race, And you've got these reporters. | ||
| He says something mean about John McCain because John McCain was an evil person that's boiling in hell right now. | ||
| He was responsible for so much death and destruction. | ||
| So many problems we're still dealing with today are a consequence of John McCain and his allies like Lindsey Graham's just planting little seeds of war around the world during their seemingly unending tenure in the United States government. | ||
| So I think no words are too vicious to describe John McCain. | ||
| But because he said that, they feel like they can say that actually he thinks all veterans, like they'll extrapolate that to mean all veterans are losers. | ||
| And then they quote an anonymous source saying that. | ||
| And this was a big scandal during the campaign in 2020. | ||
| And Joe Biden is resurrecting it once again. | ||
| But just watch the transformation that Joe Biden goes through. | ||
| We've seen him get angry. | ||
| I don't think we've ever seen him get this angry. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number 11. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The one that offends me the most is when he refused as president to visit an American cemetery outside of Paris when he was president. | |
| Why? He said that those soldiers who gave their lives were, quote, because his quote, suckers and losers. | ||
| Suckers and losers, he said it. | ||
| Who the hell does he think he is? | ||
| Who does he think he is? | ||
| These are heroes. These soldiers are heroes. | ||
| Yeah, he never actually said that. | ||
| He never actually said that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's just like, good Lord, Joe. | |
| My God. Can you imagine working under somebody like this? | ||
| But then again, all Democrats have stories like that. | ||
| Kamala Harris is the same way. | ||
| Not even politicians, just liberal companies. | ||
| You read any, you know, internal exposés about Google or Facebook or any of these big tech leftist companies. | ||
| It's always this very nice loving outside and then you get inside and it's just hatred and viciousness and backstabbing and people flying off the handle and everybody just cowed into silence. | ||
| Every time, like every one of these, you know, anytime you see an exposé like that, That's the case, and so Joe Biden just sort of fits the mold. | ||
| Of course, this just never happened. | ||
| He's just lying completely. | ||
| He says they refused to visit a cemetery, but staffers from the National Security Council and Secret Service told Trump that the rainy weather made the hospital travel to the cemetery risky, but they could drive there. | ||
| Trump responded by saying he didn't want to visit the cemetery because it's filled with losers. | ||
| I don't want to go to a cemetery filled with losers. | ||
| I mean, does that really sound like Trump? | ||
| Does that really sound like Trump? Meanwhile, Biden is like looking at his watch while the men that died from his orders are being, their bodies being wheeled out in flag-covered caskets. | ||
| I'm sure Biden is so infuriated that Trump... | ||
| Is reported to have called soldiers losers. | ||
| Trump, the guy who picks up the hat for military members and then salutes them? | ||
| Yeah. Like that guy? Yeah. | ||
| The guy who donated his presidential payroll to Veterans Affairs? | ||
| The guy that didn't start any new wars? | ||
| Oh yeah, that guy. During his entire tenure? | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, Joe Biden's looking at his watch though. | ||
| Apparently never calls the military families of people who have died. | ||
| We had that report recently with a Gold Star family member saying we never got a call from Joe Biden. | ||
| We never got a call of sympathy from our president. | ||
| Whereas I've heard story after story of people being like, I expected a call from Donald Trump. | ||
| I didn't expect him to sit down and talk with us for two hours, but that's what he did. | ||
| I mean, it's just absurd. | ||
| Just basic observation should tell you how ridiculous this story is. | ||
| But again, I think the takeaway for me is the president is not only incompetent, barely able to walk just completely out of his depths, but also has a major anger problem that is not healthy. | ||
| Especially not if you're the leader of the free world with your hand on the nuclear button. | ||
| But hey, here's the good news. | ||
| He's not actually in control of the military. | ||
| He's not in control of his own faculties. | ||
| It turns out he's not in control of anything. | ||
| It turns out the US military is operating entirely independent of the executive branch at this point. | ||
| Is that good news? | ||
| Not for the fate of the republic. | ||
| Not for the existence of democracy. | ||
| But maybe for the existence of the world, it's good that Joe Biden isn't actually in charge. | ||
| We'll be right back to explain that. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. | ||
| We're going to talk about another bombshell revelation from Seymour Hersh, who has to be the most prolific exposer of deep state secrets the world has ever seen. | ||
| First came to prominence for exposing the Mai Lai massacre in Vietnam. | ||
| Since then, he's uncovered the truth about Nord Stream pipeline. | ||
| I mean, there's just been a number of stories in the last few years from Seymour Hersh that usually more or less confirm what we already expected. | ||
| And this story is not very different. | ||
| But as we know, still, the world is holding its breath. | ||
| Awaiting the Israel counterattack against Iran's counterattack against Israel's bombing of their consulate in Damascus. | ||
| Biden tells Netanyahu U.S. will not participate in any counterstrike against Iran. | ||
| That was published on the 14th of April. | ||
| President Biden and senior members of his national security team seeking to contain the risk of wider regional war following a barrage of Iranian missiles and drones directed towards Israel have told their counterparts the U.S. will not participate in any offensive action against Iran, according to U.S. officials familiar with the matter. | ||
| So what this represents to me, and we did a long short discussion about this on Moonbase Live yesterday. | ||
| You want to hear the breakdown? | ||
| With myself and Lebanon, John, who knows the Middle Eastern character rather well. | ||
| This would represent the first real attempt to rein in Israel. | ||
| Obviously, Israel is able to do everything it's able to do because it has the implicit backing of the United States preventing any true retribution against them. | ||
| For evidence that we have this ProPublica article. | ||
| Blinken has not sanctioned Israeli units linked to killings and rapes despite staff recommendations. | ||
| Blinken is sitting on staff recommendations to sanction Israel military units linked to killings or rapes. | ||
| Special State Department panel told Secretary of State Anthony Blinken that the U.S. should restrict arms sales to Israeli military units that have been credibly accused of human rights abuses, but he has not taken any actions. | ||
| And we continue to arm Israel. | ||
| The human rights abusers. | ||
| So it really doesn't matter what they do. | ||
| We will back them up and that's been the case for as long as Israel has been in existence and certainly throughout the Gaza war for the last six months. | ||
| So this might point to a change in that policy. | ||
| Of course, the Biden administration has attempted in a pathetic sort of way to beg Israel to at least tamp down a little bit on the massacres. | ||
| The ongoing murder spree taking place over the last six months, it's been routinely ignored as Israel continues unabated in their genocidal campaign to depopulate the Gaza Strip and turn it into a water park. | ||
| So this actually represents or could represent a move to actually rein in Israel a little bit. | ||
| And it's seemingly moderately effective. | ||
| But here's the story from Seymour Hersh. | ||
| It's titled, A Military Solution to a Political Problem, How the Pentagon Engineered a Fake War to Prevent a Real One. | ||
| This is a crazy story. | ||
| It's not exactly a false flag. | ||
| I'm not exactly sure what to call it. | ||
| I've spent much of my career reporting on the American military's misdeeds and worse, especially during the Vietnam War, but now it's time to applaud the brilliance of the Pentagon. | ||
| Pentagon planning staff and operational officers who did what America assured Iran's religious and military leadership it could do, allow Iran to respond to yet another Israeli assassination by flinging more than 300 drones and missiles towards Israeli targets that as many as possible would be shot out of the sky before hitting the ground there. allow Iran to respond to yet another Israeli assassination by It was a huge gamble, and it paid off. | ||
| The Pentagon was essentially resisting the foreign policy of the Biden White House and NATO by secretly approaching one of Iran's closest allies, Russia, and persuading a senior general there to reassure Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran's 84-year-old supreme leader, that America had the know-how to make the strategy succeed. | ||
| He says, imagine it, two of Biden's administration's most entrenched enemies, Russia and Iran, trusting and working with the Pentagon and its leadership to prevent a deadly retaliation for yet another Israeli assassination of an Iranian general and six other Iranians in Damascus. | ||
| So, this article is telling a story that the Iranian bombardment just a few days ago of 300 drones and self-guided missiles It was a giant puppet show. | ||
| It was a giant display of power, sound and fury signifying nothing. | ||
| It wasn't a real attack. | ||
| It was a pre-planned, highly organized illusion. | ||
| So the Pentagon cooperated with Russia and Iran and To tailor exactly how this attack would take place and how it would not be allowed to succeed with the cooperation of Iran in this plan. | ||
| So they got together with Iran and said, alright, look, this is how many we can handle. | ||
| Here's where we can handle it. | ||
| So you need to save face. | ||
| You need to respond. You need to retaliate because otherwise you can't just let Israel get away with this. | ||
| This is the political calculus in Iran. | ||
| You've got to do something. | ||
| So you launch these missiles here. | ||
| We'll intercept them here. | ||
| It'll make a lot of noise. It'll be a big amount of chaos, and then that'll be over. | ||
| It's not a false flag, but it wasn't real either. | ||
| And of course, Seymour Hersh is praising the Pentagon for this brilliant handling of this situation. | ||
| But it is, of course, just... | ||
| What Trump did with Syria, right? | ||
| When the war drums were beating for Syria because of the fake gas attack that tried to get us into direct conflict with Russia over Syria. | ||
| And Donald Trump launched cruise missiles at empty bases, bases that had been emptied because Trump told the Russians what he was doing. | ||
| And as the cruise missiles flew through the air... | ||
| For the first time in Trump's presidency, the entire mainstream media came together as a chorus to praise him for being presidential. | ||
| The first time that they gave him any grace at all was when they thought he was starting a war. | ||
| But what it turned out was to be an illusion, to look like a big response, but it cut off the chain of events and didn't allow it to proceed. | ||
| They want continual escalation. | ||
| That's what they thought they were getting, not realizing that Trump had actually fired missiles at empty buildings. | ||
| And while it looked like a powerful response, it guaranteed that it wouldn't go any further. | ||
| So they basically just took Trump's idea and implemented it, but this time implemented it with the cooperation of Iran, Russia, as well as Jordan, and the other allies in the region. | ||
| He says it's important to stay that President Joe Biden, whose foreign policy team was not involved in this process, accepted the high-risk plan and publicly urged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose political career and personal freedom depend on keeping the war in Gaza going, and the rest of Israeli leadership not to respond to Iran. | ||
| That they might launch a counterattack remains a possibility, of course, according to press reports in Israel. | ||
| But this is interesting. And again, this is... | ||
| So my big takeaway from this is, one, we were right about the Iranian attack. | ||
| It was not a real attack. | ||
| Which is exactly what we reported on from the moment it was happening. | ||
| So that's what it looked like. That's what it seemed like. | ||
| You can go back and see our reporting of it. | ||
| It's like, this was not real. | ||
| This was symbolic. And that's what I kept calling it, a symbolic attack. | ||
| Which, and it turns out, that's exactly what it was. | ||
| Turns out InfoWars was right again. | ||
| We also told you that 300 missiles is nothing when you look at the stockpiles that Iran has. | ||
| Just a pittance. | ||
| It was tailored to be just enough to seem like a lot while being easily intercepted and prevented from causing any significant damage by Israel, the United States, the UK, Jordan, and their other allies. | ||
| So now it's up to Israel and people still... | ||
| You know, they're holding their breath, and Israel's chief says it will respond to Iran's missile strike. | ||
| This whole thing was organized and carefully orchestrated with the participation of Iran and Russia to not let this spiral out of control, which I guess is good. | ||
| I guess it's good that they're not letting this spiral out of control. | ||
| It is concerning that this plan was put into motion without the awareness of the Commander-in-chief, that's a little bit strange that that would be the case. | ||
| It's also disturbing that Israel might not be playing along at the end of the day. | ||
| They launched hundreds of drones, ballistic missiles, and cruise missiles at Israel. | ||
| In the attack, the Israeli military said that 99% of the drone missiles were intercepted by Israel's own air defense and war planes and in coordination with the U.S.-led coalition of partners. | ||
| So that was all just a big show. | ||
| It was all a big show. | ||
| It was all carefully orchestrated. | ||
| It was never meant to cause any damage. | ||
| Just a little bit of war theater for you as the real conflict goes on in the shadows. | ||
| We'll be right back. The slippery slope is not just real. | ||
| It's steeper than we expected. | ||
| This is such a ridiculous and outrageous story. | ||
| But it's perfectly in line with everything else that we've seen so far. | ||
| So I guess this is just the modern world. | ||
| We're going to go to clip number 16 here in just a second. | ||
| But we have other stories that are very much in line with what we're about to see. | ||
| Why does a woke Maryland private school want to know the gender identity of young students and if they've had, quote, oral sex? | ||
| The parents of an elite Baltimore County Maryland private school where tuition ranges from $32,000 to $38,000 for upper school per year are beyond frustrated. | ||
| Many can't voice their concerns about the woke mind virus infecting the school's administration because contracts signed during the COVID era silenced them from speaking out. | ||
| And apparently they are asking young, vulnerable students about weird fetishes Including their gender and sexuality. | ||
| Ask them if they've had oral sex. | ||
| Just creepy stuff. | ||
| Again, just getting younger and younger and weirder and weirder. | ||
| And then this was posted by Libs of TikTok yesterday. | ||
| Students walked out of the Nebo School District in Utah to protest the school for allowing furries to terrorize other students. | ||
| Students claim the furries bite them, bark at them, and pounce on them without any repercussion. | ||
| However, if they defend themselves, they get in trouble. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number 16. | ||
| Leave the people, not the animals. | ||
| Leave the people, not the animals. | ||
| They're holding signs that say compelled speech is not free speech. | ||
| Leave the people, not the animals. | ||
| Leave the people, not the animals. | ||
| These are like middle schoolers, certainly not high schoolers. | ||
| Future Info Warriors. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Somebody was telling me that the furries were attacking you guys in class, is that right? | |
| Yes. They bite kids. | ||
| They bite people. They will bite ankles. | ||
| How do they bite your ankle? | ||
| They go on the floor and they walk on the floor and run down the hall. | ||
| They'll scratch people. | ||
| They'll lift your shoes and then bite you. | ||
| They scratch people, they bite people. | ||
| And one kid got bit and then he kicked the furry and then he got suspended. | ||
| They won't stop biting at us. | ||
| It's not fair. We're not allowed to wear a mask on Halloween, but then they wear masks every day. | ||
| So you can't wear a mask on Halloween? | ||
| No, we can't wear masks on Halloween, but they can wear masks every day. | ||
| It's not fair. So are they wearing a mask every day? | ||
| Yes! But every time they go, they're always just wearing a mask, but the principal finally shut up and banned those folks. | ||
| But they still wear them every day. | ||
| And they don't get in trouble. | ||
| The principal doesn't make them get in trouble. | ||
| All the principal says is just be kind, be nice, be nice. | ||
| What's the point of dressing up like a furry? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| They think they're so cool that they want to be in the animal. | ||
| They think they want attention. | ||
| So people can come at them and just look at them and think that they're so cool. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Also, if they buy us and we just get them, we get in trouble. | ||
| They attack us. They attack us and we get in trouble. | ||
| How else do they attack you guys? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They either bite us, they scratch us, they guardate us. | |
| They pounce on us. | ||
| They run on all fours and pounce on people. | ||
| Why are they spraying you with Febreze? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just because they're jerks. And there's a rumor that they were putting litter boxes in the girls' bathroom. | |
| They're putting litter boxes. | ||
| I heard that was just a rumor. | ||
| No, it's true. | ||
| Is this something you've seen? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. So, we can't talk or say anything to the furries or even look at them, but they can come look at us and they can say stuff to us and touch us. | |
| No matter what we do. | ||
| Interesting. That sounds like a double standard to me. | ||
| Yes. Okay, you guys stay on the sidewalk, okay? | ||
| Also, we're not allowed to look at them, go near them within a 10-feet circle, otherwise the teachers will come and get mad at us. | ||
| The teachers get mad at them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How old are the kids that are dressed like furries? | |
| They're like 11, 12. | ||
| They're 13 and they shouldn't be allowed to. | ||
| They bring dog bowls to lunch. | ||
| Oh my god. They bring dog bowls to lunch. | ||
| There's kitty litter boxes in the bathroom. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why do you think the principal hasn't put a stop to this? | |
| Because her daughter. | ||
| Her daughter's a furry. | ||
| Oh, her daughter's a furry. | ||
| All right, so middle schools in America are being taken over by a psychosexual bestiality cult. | ||
| Your children in public school. | ||
| You know, I have solutions to this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
this. | |
| I just can't say them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| Furries. | ||
| I guess at this point, it's not really necessary for me to... | ||
| Tell you what furries are. | ||
| You should probably know that by now. | ||
| But it's a fetish, basically. | ||
| It's a fetish. So you now have 10 to 14-year-old children dressing up like animals, biting other students, eating out of dog bowls, pooping in litter boxes. | ||
| And when the students complain about it, The administration punishes them because they're treating this bizarre, fetishistic mental illness as if it is some protected class. | ||
| Sort of inevitable it was going to get this way. | ||
| Honestly, I just can't even... | ||
| Okay, alright. It's very weird. | ||
| It's sort of symbolic in the fact that without the support of the... | ||
| The way sort of power works, it's very strange. | ||
| I can't imagine a single teacher going along with this. | ||
| But I guess if they get the instruction from on high... | ||
| It's like, well, look, this is an expression of their sexuality, and you wouldn't discriminate against a gay kid, so you're not allowed to discriminate against the person who gets aroused thinking that they're a dog. | ||
| And so then teachers just go along with it. | ||
| They just go, oh, okay. Okay, so when the dog person bites the normal child, it's the normal child's fault. | ||
| Okay, I get it. And they just go along with it and just enforce it. | ||
| Like, I can't even imagine that happening in the first place, but I guess that's how it works. | ||
| Teachers just go along with this crap for some unknown, godforsaken reason. | ||
| They go along with this. | ||
| But, you know, without the administration, without the teachers enforcing that, this wouldn't be a problem. | ||
| This wouldn't be a problem. It was just law of the jungle. | ||
| Like, if teachers went, hey, you can do whatever you want, but I'm not going to protect you. | ||
| You know, if you bite a kid on the ankle, it's going to kick you in the face. | ||
| Like, that's just what's going to happen. | ||
| I'm not going to protect you. Without the participation of the administration and the teachers, this would not be a problem. | ||
| Like, so many things in this... | ||
| Well, I mean, this is the modern construct where it's just like the people that are actually affected by the things that are going on could just solve these problems. | ||
| No matter what they are. | ||
| From crime in the subway to 10-year-olds dressing up like fetish animals. | ||
| If the kids had their way, they would just bully these freaks into normalness. | ||
| But they're prevented from doing it. | ||
| It's not the... Freaky kids dressed up like animals pooping in boxes that the administration is concerned about. | ||
| It's the normal kids not being okay with this. | ||
| Sort of the definition of anarcho-tyranny. | ||
| Gay fetish anarcho-tyranny. | ||
| Because again, if... | ||
| I'm telling you, if the administration didn't take an active role in preventing backlash... | ||
| This would just take care of itself. | ||
| I mean, even when I was growing up, I mean, there were little weirdos in my middle school when I was going there, right? | ||
| They were freaky weirdos that went off by themselves. | ||
| Nobody wanted to be friends with them. | ||
| But in this case, I guess if you say you don't want to be a friend with them, you're hateful. | ||
| You'll be punished. I don't know. | ||
| It's just so weird to hear these kids, like, they think it's so cool. | ||
| I was like, why do they wear masks? | ||
| Oh, so people look at them and think they're so cool. | ||
| Who thinks furries are cool? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? Have you ever... | |
| Can we bring up some of the footage of the furries again? | ||
| Is cool the word that comes to mind when you see this? | ||
| Deeply disturbing is more accurate. | ||
| I mean, if I'm being very generous, just... | ||
| Just geeky and lame and freaky and gay. | ||
| They want to look cool, so they dress up like anthropomorphic wolves in pooping boxes. | ||
| Okay, there's a disconnection here. | ||
| There's a severe disconnection from reality. | ||
| Absolute freaks. | ||
| I don't know. I'm typically like a, uh, considering adults, you know, in private, who cares? | ||
| Maybe furries should just be illegal. | ||
| Maybe we should, uh, in order to protect our children, maybe even adults that actually do this sort of stuff, like, they need to be stopped. | ||
| I don't know how we balance individual rights with whatever this is. | ||
| But right now it's not balanced at all. | ||
| So there's got to be a corrective force. | ||
| I don't know. It's so unbelievably creepy and weird. | ||
| And it is very much a sexual thing, by the way. | ||
| This is very much came out of, started as, and has always been a sexual fetish. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. Elementary school. | |
| That's elementary school these days. | ||
| You know, we have some more videos of NPR's new CEO. We played some videos yesterday of her talking to the Atlantic Council, saying, in no uncertain terms, that the biggest problem they face is the First Amendment. | ||
| And actually in that, watching it again, it was like, One of the more important aspects of it is that she's like, you know, the First Amendment has protections for institutions, which is a very good thing. | ||
| She runs Wikimedia, ran Wikimedia, now she runs NPR. As the CEO of media companies, she's like, it's good that my company has free speech. | ||
| It's good that institutions have free speech because institutions can be controlled. | ||
| She didn't say that, but that's what she means, right? | ||
| It's good institutions have free speech. | ||
| The problem comes in when individuals have free speech. | ||
| Because institutional free speech isn't free speech at all. | ||
| It's just speech dictated by the corporate structure of the institution. | ||
| That's like a very telling thing to me. | ||
| There's this weird trust in organizations that leftists have. | ||
| Where it's like, no, Wikipedia can have free speech because they have a control system. | ||
| They have a power structure. | ||
| Because there's a power structure, because there's a hierarchy within this organization, then it can have free speech because the free speech is retained and restrained by interpersonal... | ||
| Connections within the institution and then connections of the institution to other institutions. | ||
| It's the sort of ecosystem that keeps itself in line. | ||
| But an individual can go rogue, and that can't be accepted. | ||
| What they like is the illusion of free speech as it pertains to institutions, but it's when the speech is... | ||
| Individual speech, that's when they really don't like that because an individual doesn't have a boss. | ||
| Individual doesn't have a board of directors. | ||
| There's a usefulness of the group dynamic that liberals just absolutely adore. | ||
| In the same way, that's why I see this connecting to things like why Hollywood movies suck nowadays. | ||
| Because there aren't movies anymore that are just the vision of one person. | ||
| It all has to be boardroom designed. | ||
| It all has to be a think tank coming up with stuff. | ||
| They literally do not trust the individual. | ||
| They don't like the individual. | ||
| They have this bizarre delusion that Decisions arrived at by a group, by a... | ||
| What's the word I'm looking for? | ||
| It's like the tyranny of the... | ||
| Not the tyranny of the minority. | ||
| I don't know. There's a consortium. | ||
| I don't know. They don't write... | ||
| It's not just one person writing a movie. | ||
| It's got to be 20... | ||
| Diverse women in a room all deciding on a story. | ||
| And so what happens? The story they come up with sucks. | ||
| And it's terrible. Because... | ||
| Have you ever done a group project? | ||
| Then you know why this happens. | ||
| But they love it for some reason. | ||
| Because it gives them control. | ||
| So let's go to a few more videos of NPR's CEO talking about things as fundamental as truth. | ||
| Yeah, bureaucracy. There's another word I'm looking for and I'll find it here in just a second. | ||
| It'll come to me. But everybody, you get what I'm talking about, right? | ||
| Whether it's bureaucracy or cabals or whatever it is, there's this inherent trust when it comes to Ten or more people making a decision. | ||
| Somehow they think that that makes it more valid than a single person coming to a decision. | ||
| Despite the fact that time after time it's proven that committee... | ||
| I think I'm thinking of committee, right? | ||
| Writing a script by committee is just always going to be terrible. | ||
| Designing products by committee almost never works out like a single visionary. | ||
| Vision could come up with. | ||
| They love committee. | ||
| They love organization. | ||
| They love bureaucracy. They love the tyranny of small groups or large groups. | ||
| It's just the individual, the unpredictable, the independent variable is anathema to them. | ||
| I think it's telling when the new NPR CEO, the former Wikimedia CEO, says, the First Amendment's great because it gives free speech protection to corporations. | ||
| But we really run into problems when it comes to the individual expression of free speech. | ||
| So what they really want is the illusion of free speech when in reality it's controlled by a committee. | ||
| Let's go to clip number three here, where NPR's CEO... In a roundabout and obfuscatory way, clip 13 says that there is no such thing as truth and the pursuit of truth is really a hindrance to pursuit of the narrative. | ||
| Let's watch. What about the hard things, the places where we are prone to disagreement, say politics and religion? | ||
| Well, as it turns out, not only does Wikipedia's model work there, it actually works really well. | ||
| Because in our normal lives, these contentious conversations tend to erupt over disagreement about what the truth actually is. | ||
| But the people who write these articles, they're not focused on the truth. | ||
| They're focused on something else, which is the best of what we can know right now. | ||
| And after seven years of working with these brilliant folks, I've come to believe that they are onto something. | ||
| That perhaps, for our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth and seeking to convince others of the truth might not be the right place to start. | ||
| In fact, a reverence for the truth might be a distraction that's getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done. | ||
| Now, that is not to say that the truth doesn't exist, nor is it to say that the truth isn't important. | ||
| Clearly, the search for the truth has led us to do great things, to learn great things, but I think if I were to really ask you to think about this, one of the things that we could all acknowledge is that part of the reason we have such glorious chronicles to the human experience and all forms of culture is because we acknowledge there are many different truths. | ||
| And so in the spirit of that, I'm certain that the truth exists for you and probably for the person sitting next to you. | ||
| But this may not be the same truth. | ||
| This is because the truth of the matter is very often for many people what happens when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world. | ||
| So we all have different truths. | ||
| They're based on things like where we come from, how we were raised, and how other people perceive us. | ||
| Yeah, I know she said that she wasn't saying the truth doesn't exist, but that is what she was saying, actually. | ||
| But actually, that's exactly what she was saying. | ||
| There is no truth, basically. | ||
| Basically, all truth is equal, even when it's contradictory. | ||
| Your truth, my truth, their truth, our truth. | ||
| It's all equivalent, essentially. | ||
| And there is no truth. | ||
| She says, I'm not saying that there is no truth. | ||
| What I'm saying is that truth is facts and your beliefs. | ||
| When facts merge with belief, that's when you get truth. | ||
| No, there's just truth. | ||
| There's truth and there's untruth. | ||
| There's reality and there's not reality. | ||
| How anybody could say this or hear this with a straight face is kind of pathetic. | ||
| But obviously she's an expert in whatever that tone is, whatever that TED talk voice tone is that I can't ever quite get right. | ||
| But it's that kind of hopeful, soft-spoken way of talking that makes people think you're a thoughtful, intellectual person when what you're saying is complete nonsense. | ||
| Now, one of the reasons humanity's history is so glorious is because there is no truth. | ||
| Nothing is real and all cultures are equal. | ||
| She's like, what are you talking about? | ||
| But what are you talking about, though? | ||
| She says, quote, reverence for truth might be a distraction getting in the way of coming together and getting things done. | ||
| Tell you what, if truth is coming in the way of getting things done, you shouldn't be doing those things. | ||
| What things are you trying to get done? | ||
| What things have we gotten done? | ||
| Or what things are we prevented from getting done by truth? | ||
| Things that are based on lies, obviously. | ||
| So in a very subtle and rhetorically manipulative way, these people who run our media landscapes from Wikipedia and now to NPR and everywhere in between, Do not believe in objective truth. | ||
| They just don't. It might be the number one main difference between our side and their side. | ||
| Our side believes in objective truth. | ||
| We don't change our perception or try to change the facts to fit our subjective position. | ||
| When confronted with an objective truth that contradicts what we believe, we change our belief. | ||
| They're setting up an information ecosystem in which the subjective perception is the only thing that matters. | ||
| And this is a pervasive thing throughout the entire neo-communistic system that they're implementing. | ||
| We talk about it all the time on this show. | ||
| The perception is more important than the reality. | ||
| If you just stop charging crimes, the crime rate goes down and the perception is that you're doing a good job and that everybody's safe. | ||
| The reality is the opposite. | ||
| If you stop charging criminals, more criminals commit more crimes. | ||
| But to them, that's success because the perception is the crime has gone down. | ||
| They can tout that. They can claim it's a success of their policies. | ||
| I'm not just saying that. We've shown videos of people advocating exactly this. | ||
| Crime rate goes down if you just don't call them crimes. | ||
| And I always think about the holodomor and the starvation caused by the communists because, again, the perception of the communist system being superior to all other systems is the only thing that needs to be upheld even if you the perception of the communist system being superior to all other systems is the only thing that needs to be upheld even if you have to The illusion is more important because you're getting things done after all. | ||
| Because communists needed to come together and get things done even if that meant killing the kulaks, communalizing the farms, and starving everybody to death. | ||
| It's okay. Because while the facts might be that everyone died of starvation, the perception and the belief is that communism is a superior system and therefore all of the deaths must be caused by fascists or something. | ||
| We don't know. But it's just such a dangerous mindset for anybody to have, let alone the people that have their hands on the levers of information in this information war. | ||
| Clip number 20. Catherine Mayer says she abandoned a free and open internet as the mission of Wikipedia. | ||
| She had a higher goal. Let's watch. | ||
| I started by talking about the idea of free and open as some of our founding principles, sort of free and open source coming from the idea of The open source community. | ||
| Well, I have come to the opinion and the perspective that free and open was a way of looking at the world that was inherently limited relative to what we were trying to achieve. | ||
| Free and open has the best of intentionality, but in the end, what free and open often ended up doing, particularly in the case of Wikipedia, was really recapitulating many of the same power structures and dynamics that exist offline prior to the advent of the internet. | ||
| And so what we ended up seeing was Wikipedia really rebuilt this idea of knowledge as a whole around the Western canon. | ||
| You see the exclusion of communities, of languages, because of the ways in which Wikipedia is based on reliable sources, the idea of a written tradition. | ||
| It's something that is particular to many, I mean, not, sorry, the idea of a written tradition, which is particular to some cultures and not to others. | ||
| The ways in which we ascribe notability often really comes from sort of this white, male, westernized construct around who matters in societies and who is elevated and whose voices. | ||
| And so some of these ideas of sort of this radical openness really did not end up with the intention Really did not end up living into the intentionality of what openness can be. | ||
| So I think she just sort of laid out the whole game right there, didn't she? | ||
| The problem with things being open and free is that That concept of a society being open and free is white male. | ||
| It's a western construct. | ||
| In order to defeat white men, in order to defeat the Christian foundations of the western world, we can't be open and free. | ||
| Because if you're open and free, well, the white guys win, I guess. | ||
| So this is the embedded superlative focus on equity and that if you have things that are open and free, if you have competition that's open and free, turns out white guys in the history of Europe and of white people in general sort of bubbles to the top. | ||
| In a lot of ways. It sort of proves itself as the most effective, best system out there. | ||
| And they hate that system. | ||
| But their belief is that that system is bad. | ||
| So they have to crush and destroy that system by no longer being open and free. | ||
| To be open and free is to allow humanity to take the course that it chooses. | ||
| Which happens to be a course of openness and freedom and love and, you know, Christianity. | ||
| And white Western successes. | ||
| We can't have that. All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| When you realize that so much of what we talk about on this show, so much of what the right... | ||
| and the dissident right wing especially is concerned about it all comes down to just a general possibly well racist isn't the right word but just a general hatred of white culture European culture and a sort of petulant misguided attempt to bring it down at all costs We've all heard about the, | ||
| I don't know if you'd call it an experiment, the program that the German government ran after World War II in which they gave children to pedophiles just to see what happened to allow them to explicitly raise the children as sex slaves. | ||
| Children that have been taken from their parents, in many cases. | ||
| Sometimes they were orphans and simply didn't have any parents to protect them. | ||
| Other times, the state fabricated reasons to take children away from parents and give them to the pedophiles. | ||
| And it begs the question, why? | ||
| Why would they do that? What would compel a government to participate in this program? | ||
| Especially such a widespread... | ||
| I mean, this thing went on for years. | ||
| Why would they do that? | ||
| And when you look into it, It was, of course, to defeat the Nazis. | ||
| There had been this theorized connection between sexual restraint and fascist ideology. | ||
| So to defeat the fascists, we have to give the gay men sex slave children. | ||
| Seriously, that was the reasoning behind it. | ||
| Was that sexual liberation was a key component in preventing the rise of fascism. | ||
| A.K.A. Hardcore nationalism ever again. | ||
| And part of it is projection. | ||
| Because they have this idea that they constantly reinforce to themselves that white culture is oppressive. | ||
| It's really not. | ||
| It is actually... | ||
| In human history, the least repressive thing ever, which is why we're kind of in this trouble, right? | ||
| Because when you have an open, in the classical sense, liberal society, you allow people with unpopular ideas to voice them, and maybe they shift the culture over time. | ||
| But we've decided as a culture, as a race, That's worth it. | ||
| That's good. That's how you get to the best answer. | ||
| Even if some people have crazy ideas, even if sometimes things get a little wonky, that's okay because at the end of the day, by allowing it to be free, by allowing everybody to have a say, by allowing everybody to follow their conscience, we arrive at the best answer. | ||
| Now, these people paint it as though actually it's extremely repressive and oppressive because But this runs into trouble because as she just laid out there, I mean, really that last statement sort of encapsulates it all. | ||
| They go, you know, we thought free and open was a really good idea. | ||
| We thought it'd be great. Because again, they're working on the assumption that white Western Christian society is oppressive. | ||
| So they're thinking, okay, if we just remove that oppression, if we remove that repression, And make it all open and free, then it's going to be diverse. | ||
| There's going to be lots of different ideas. | ||
| None are better than any others. | ||
| Everything's equal. We just have to get rid of this oppression by evil white Christian men. | ||
| What ends up happening when you have a totally open and free environment of ideas? | ||
| The best ones rise to the top. | ||
| The best ones are civilizations that are open and free and white and Christian. | ||
| So this is like a cognitive dissonance for them. | ||
| Because then they go, oh, okay, we have to actually oppress the white people. | ||
| You see what I'm saying? Do you know what I mean? | ||
| How it's a projection of oppression. | ||
| They remove the oppression expecting things to be different. | ||
| And it turns out that oppression isn't necessary for the best ideas to rise to the top. | ||
| Turns out that you actually only need oppression to keep down the best ideas. | ||
| You only need oppression to stop the white Christian men from espousing their ideas and making them popular. | ||
| Without oppression, they tend to rise to the top because they're just the best ideas. | ||
| They really are. | ||
| No disrespect to other cultures, but some of them are terrible. | ||
| Remember Sargon of Akkad used to do a, you know, all cultures are equal sarcastic videos where he would talk about people like eating cookies made of mud in Haiti and being like, this is great and wonderful and totally equal to everything we have. | ||
| In just this very sarcastic way. | ||
| Or like when COVID broke out and I was arguing about China and there was just like a rash of videos being put up of Chinese people just like eating live mice and bats and like armadillos and just like all this disgusting crap. | ||
| Or things that you see in China of like a little kid gets hit by a car and the other cars just don't Stop and just keep running the kid over. | ||
| Like, they just don't care. But they have this, like, weird thing in their society where if you save somebody's life, you then have to be responsible for them for the rest of their life. | ||
| And so people just refuse to go and help somebody. | ||
| Really, really disturbing stuff. | ||
| But that's their culture. | ||
| Is it an equal culture to one that doesn't act that way? | ||
| No, it's not, actually. | ||
| Now, they find that extremely offensive that I might say that. | ||
| But I don't want to eat cookies and I don't want to live in a world where people are afraid to help each other. | ||
| I don't want to live in a world like India where they're bathing in rivers next to dead bodies floating by. | ||
| These are not equal and as good as Western cultures. | ||
| They're just not. It's not a racist thing. | ||
| It's a cultural thing. | ||
| It's an idea thing. But again, these people are operating in a delusion. | ||
| And so they feel as though they have to counteract non-existent suppression. | ||
| By oppressing the best ideas. | ||
| Similar to, like, capitalism or anything else. | ||
| When you just give people freedom, they tend to align to a Western Christian philosophy of love your neighbor, but have standards. | ||
| Same thing as... | ||
| Like the construct of the family. | ||
| It's just the best. | ||
| A nuclear family being the bedrock of your culture is just superior to every other construct. | ||
| It just is scientifically proven. | ||
| Spiritually, it's better. | ||
| Everything about it is better. | ||
| So if you just let people decide on their own how to form a society, they'll likely form it as a patriarchal society with the family as the building block. | ||
| Of a mother and a father and their children. | ||
| That's just what is the best construct. | ||
| They have this, again, delusion that that is the consequence of oppression so that by removing oppression you would have polyamory and whatever else, right? | ||
| Gay marriage and kids being raised as dogs. | ||
| And that's somehow better. It's not, though. | ||
| And you need oppression actually to bring that about. | ||
| Connecting it back to that story of the middle schoolers with the furry children. | ||
| If it weren't for the oppression of the administration, the furries wouldn't be an issue. | ||
| It requires oppression to bring this stuff about, and they justify the oppression by imagining oppression coming from white people. | ||
| But it's all anti-white, it's all anti-European, anti-Christian. | ||
| These people have a civilizational hate of Europe. | ||
| Because it's proven to be the best at managing human affairs. | ||
| And we'll be back on the other side to talk about some other just bizarre cultural touchstones that we should be paying attention to. | ||
| We'll come back to that on the other side. | ||
| I do want to remind you that There's a pretty significant sale going on right now for preparedness items at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Water filters and storable food are two things that very rarely go on sale at Infowars, but they're now both 10% off. | ||
| So whether it's World War III, a natural disaster, or just some unexpected electricity outage, you should be prepared. | ||
| prepared you you absolutely must have at least some storable food and a way to filter water for the survival of your family into the future go to info or store.com to get them now and 10% off all right welcome back ladies and gentlemen | ||
| There's a reason that things are getting more insane, and that's because in the real world, in physical reality, the New World Order is faltering. | ||
| Their march has slowed to a crawl And we may soon be going in the opposite direction. | ||
| The Ukraine war is all but lost. | ||
| Of course, that was never... | ||
| I genuinely don't think that winning the Ukraine war was ever a possibility. | ||
| And I think for at least the last year, there's been a... | ||
| I don't know if it's a deliberate policy of just depopulating Ukraine for resettlement by foreign elements. | ||
| Or if that's just a consequence of a moronic war policy. | ||
| But it's been a meme for a little while, basically saying, until the last Ukrainian. | ||
| Sort of sounds heroic. | ||
| Until the last Ukrainian. | ||
| If you're standing up for something. | ||
| But what that means is they're just going to kill everyone in Ukraine. | ||
| They're depopulating Ukraine. | ||
| They'll fight until the last Ukrainian, and then they'll kill that last Ukrainian, and then they'll be able to do whatever they want with Ukraine. | ||
| While that sounds hyperbolic, perhaps a little hard to believe, it's actually becoming increasingly true. | ||
| Ukraine's Zelensky signs new army draft law to boost conscription. | ||
| Zelensky has signed into law a bill overhauling army mobilization rules as Ukraine seeks to address acute troop shortages in its fight against Russia's invasion. | ||
| Acute troop shortages that have suddenly developed. | ||
| Now, they're all dying. | ||
| It obliges men to update their draft data with the authorities, boost payment to those who volunteer, and adds new punishments for draft dodging. | ||
| And it essentially conscripts Everyone in the country from 25 to 60. | ||
| He lowered the draft age from 27 to 25 and began a major mobilization drive. | ||
| And more and more videos are coming out of Ukrainian men being shoved into vans by soldiers and shipped off to die on the front lines for no discernible reason. | ||
| Compelled to do so by a president who has canceled elections for the foreseeable future. | ||
| It's now saying it will soon be illegal to even broadcast anything in the Russian language. | ||
| They've already basically destroyed the Russian ethnic element in Ukraine anyway, taken all the Russian language channels off the air. | ||
| It soon will be illegal to speak Russian at all, apparently, on the airwaves in Ukraine because it's a democracy after all. | ||
| UK insurers refused to pay Nord Stream because blasts were government-backed. | ||
| The legal team, representing high-powered insurers Lloyds and Arch, say that since the Nord Stream explosions were, quote, more likely than not to have been inflicted by a government, they have no responsibility to pay for damages to the pipelines. | ||
| To succeed in that defense, the companies will presumably be compelled to prove in court who carried out those attacks. | ||
| Which, that doesn't... | ||
| how is that their obligation that should not be their obligation i don't believe that is their obligation they should have read the fine print the the nordstrom people should have read the fine print yeah and that that uh insurance clause well and this is the thing if if you insure a house against fire And then it's proven that the fire was arson. | ||
| And if there's a clause saying it has to be an accidental fire, right? | ||
| You're insuring it against accidental fire. | ||
| But if it's arson, you're not going to get a payout. | ||
| And it's proven to be arson. | ||
| Is it the insurance? They have to prove who did the arson? | ||
| They have to prove that? | ||
| I wouldn't think so. We're good to go. | ||
| States that the defendants will rely on inter alia the fact that the explosion damage could only have or at least more likely than not to have been inflicted by or under the order of a government. | ||
| As a result, they argue the explosion damage was directly or indirectly occasioned by happening through or a consequence of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and fails under an exclusion relating to military conflict and falls under an exclusion relating to military conflicts. | ||
| So basically they had insurance on the Nord Stream pipeline saying, yeah, we'll ensure this against any problems that happen. | ||
| You know, unless a war breaks out and somebody intentionally damages it, in which case we can't be held responsible for that. | ||
| And I mean, it happens sometimes where you'll have like undersea cables that get bitten by sharks and stuff. | ||
| That's happened before. Or if you have an earthquake and the pipeline gets damaged, they'd pay for that. | ||
| You can't insure an item and then bomb the item and then collect the insurance. | ||
| That's not how it works. | ||
| So this insurance company seems to think that it was a, I mean, it obviously was a government. | ||
| What am I saying? Obviously it was a government attack. | ||
| Everybody knows this. It's just interesting that the insurance company is now making that argument and maybe proving it in court soon. | ||
| That'd be fun to see. This is a very interesting story from Real Clear Investigations. | ||
| Impeachment whistleblower was in the loop of Biden-Ukraine affairs that Trump wanted probed. | ||
| The whistleblower who sparked Donald Trump's first impeachment was deeply involved in the political maneuverings behind Biden family business schemes in Ukraine that Trump wanted probed. | ||
| Newly obtained emails from former Vice President Joe Biden's office reveal. | ||
| Eric Chiaramella. | ||
| Remember this guy? They refused to publish his name for a long time. | ||
| You'd get kicked off the internet for saying his name. | ||
| You'd get banned for speaking this man's name. | ||
| Well, there was a reason for that. | ||
| The reason was because if you knew who the whistleblower was, you wouldn't take his complaints quite as seriously. | ||
| They would be seen less as a whistleblower complaint as much as the political cover for the cover-up To stop Trump from exposing corruption. | ||
| Eric Chiaramella privately expressed shock, yikes, at linking USA to firing a prosecutor probing the firm to paying Biden's son. | ||
| But he kept publicly mum about it, so was he really shocked? | ||
| In 2019, the then Intelligence Council analyst, Eric Chiaramella, Chiara Mella, I think that's how you say it, Chiara Mella, touched off a political firestorm when he anonymously accused Trump of linking military aid for Ukraine to a demand for an investigation into alleged Biden corruption in that country. | ||
| But four years later, while working as a national security analyst attached to then-Vice President Joe Biden's office, Chiara Mello was a close advisor when Biden threatened to cut off U.S. aid to Ukraine unless it fired its top prosecutor, Victor Shokin, who was investigating Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. | ||
| At the time, the corruption-riddled energy giant was paying Biden's son Hunter millions of dollars. | ||
| Those payments, along with other evidence tying Joe Biden to his family's business dealings, received little attention in 2019 as Chiara Mello accused Trump of a corrupt quid pro quo. | ||
| Neither did subsequent investigation indicating that Hunter Biden's associates had identified Shokin as a, quote, key target. | ||
| These matters are now part of a House impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden. | ||
| It now seems that there is material evidence that would have been used at the impeachment trial to exonerate Trump, said George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, who's testified as an expert witness in the ongoing Biden impeachment inquiry. | ||
| Trump was alleging there was a conflict of interest with the Bidens and that the evidence would have challenged Biden's account and established his son's interest in the Shoken firing. | ||
| Chiara Mela's role, including high-level discussions with top Biden aides and Ukrainian prosecutors, is now only coming to light due to the recent release of White House emails and photos from the National Archive. | ||
| The emails show that Chiara Mela expressed shock, yikes is what he wrote, at Biden's move to withhold the $1 billion aid from Kiev, which represented a sudden shift in U.S. policy. | ||
| They also show he was drawn into the White House communications over and over and over. | ||
| Over how to control adverse publicity from Hunter taking a lucrative seat on Burisma's board. | ||
| There is no evidence that Chiarmelo raised alarms about the questionable Biden business activities he witnessed firsthand, which is in sharp contrast to 2019. | ||
| In that instance, he was galvanized into action after being told by the White House colleague Alexander Vindman of an improper phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. | ||
| During the call, Trump solicited Zelensky's help in investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden's role in the company. | ||
| Some congressional investigators say Chiara Mella effectively helped cover up a scandal far worse than what Trump was impeached over. | ||
| What's more, he failed to disclose that he had a potential conflict of interest stemming from his connection to the matter Trump asked Zelensky to probe when he lodged his complaint against Trump. | ||
| Again, this is confirmation of what we've known the whole time, but it is confirmation of that. | ||
| And it does illustrate, to a very high degree, just how corrupt this entire proceeding was. | ||
| And this was our stance from the... | ||
| Instant that this entire impeachment charade got started, all the way back in 2019, as the Event 201 cabal was simultaneously gathering in New York City to plot their attack on the whole world by releasing COVID, there was the impeachment trial of Donald Trump that was obviously a cover-up attempt. | ||
| That's what we said at the time, over and over. | ||
| This is a cover-up of the actual crimes. | ||
| Ukraine, it was a tangled nest of... | ||
| Corruption, manipulation, coercion, and profit. | ||
| Trump started looking into it, and so the people involved acted to protect themselves by impeaching Trump. | ||
| If you die or get injured from a COVID-19 vaccine, your average payout is $3,700. | ||
| These are the real stories of the vaccine injured. | ||
| They were totally completely wiped off of social media. | ||
| There's been thousands of peer-reviewed medical studies. | ||
| Thousands of them studying vaccine injuries. | ||
| They are real. People are dying. | ||
| People are having heart attacks, strokes, blood clots. | ||
| And many other countries are dropping the COVID-19 vaccine and saying we shouldn't give them to children. | ||
| It's time to be honest about the vaccine injured. | ||
| And we need to stop allowing these COVID-19 vaccines to be given out to children. | ||
| Remember, the globalists cooked up COVID. They cooked up the poison shot. | ||
| 20-plus million are dead. They were willing to do that for power and control. | ||
| What else would they do? | ||
| And the answer is, the sky's the limit. | ||
| Thomas Jefferson was once asked by a newspaper reporter, he could pull up the full interview. | ||
| But the quote's famous. | ||
| The reporter said, what is the limits to which tyrants will go? | ||
| He said, tyranny knows no limit. | ||
| Its limit is what good men will allow. | ||
| The only way that tyrants flourish is that good men do nothing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
An interesting psychological phenomenon is known as the ostrich effect. | |
| Sticking your head in the sand. | ||
| Maybe you're familiar with this. | ||
| So people, many people, are rather nervous of opening their gas bill or perhaps opening the envelope with their exam results in it. | ||
| So people have an aversion to discovering simple facts about what's going on around them. | ||
| One needs to confront some realities and think about what to do about them. | ||
| The ostrich effect We'll lead you to avoid doing this, and that's something we need to combat. | ||
| The limit of tyranny is what you'll put up with, because even if you have some tyrant who's bad, but, you know, has some qualms, or maybe just isn't a megalomaniac and knows they can't go too far, they'll be replaced sooner or later by somebody even worse. | ||
| They'll be replaced by somebody even worse, and then it gets until you have total insanity. | ||
| And that's the level we're reaching now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What this WHO international treaty that's currently being ironed out over at the UN, what is it all about? | |
| Well, the key points are that with the support of the financial institutions of the Rockefeller Foundation, the Wellcome Trust and the Gates Foundation, we're essentially ceding the ability to suspend all civil liberties and all of the rights associated with what we would call the Bill of Rights here in the United States, International Declaration of Human Rights. | ||
| All of those can be suspended by a capricious determination that there's a public health emergency. | ||
| And the minute that happens, there are no rights. | ||
| In a nutshell, that's what the treaty is. | ||
| It is a sovereignty issue. | ||
| So the WHO wants the right to tell us what drugs we can and can't have and how we are to manage health emergencies in the future. | ||
| But by also creating this thing they call the One Health Approach, which enables everything else to be wrapped up into health, It seems that the sovereignty grab is going to be greater than just health, right? | ||
| If you say climate change, health is related to climate, so now we can call climate emergencies or something like that. | ||
| Americans are so sick of our corrupt government, and they're so sick of being persecuted by it, and it's saying we're the enemy because we're good, hard-working Christians, or populists, or capitalists, they hate us all, that we then tend to think any other government that's in opposition to them Must be good. | ||
| And that is not the case, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Just because our government's hijacked and evil doesn't mean all these other governments are just these little sweetie pies that are totally perfect. | ||
| And doesn't mean if we get into a war with them, they won't rain nuclear weapons down on us. | ||
| So our enemy is the ruling, disconnected, out of control, Corporations. | ||
| But these people can commit all these crimes, make all these mistakes, do all these terrible things and have it swept under the rug. | ||
| And so they get a feeling of infallibility. | ||
| They get a feeling of invincibility. | ||
| And that's what always surely leads to total destruction. | ||
| Total destruction is the topic of the hour. | ||
| We'll be joined by Mike Shelby on the other side. | ||
| Talk about what you can do to prepare for the planned leftist terrorism, whether or not Trump wins the election. | ||
| Stay with us, folks. Very important segment coming up. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| I'm very excited for this segment. | ||
| I'm joined by Mike Shelby. | ||
| He's a former intelligence NCO and contractor. | ||
| He is the founder of ForwardObserver.com, an intelligence service company specializing in threat intelligence, trend analysis, conflict monitoring, and applied intelligence training. | ||
| You can follow Mike on X at GrayZoneIntel. | ||
| That's GrayZoneIntel spelled with an A, G-R-A-Y, ZoneIntel. | ||
| And the website again is ForwardObserver.com. | ||
| Thanks so much for joining us once again, Mike. | ||
| Hey, Harrison. Thanks for having me. | ||
| Good to see you again. Welcome to my show! | ||
| But your analysis of this, I think, is very important and will be increasingly important in the next year or so. | ||
| Why was this big—it was a Palestinian protest called A15. Why was this so important for you to focus on it, and why are you focusing on it still? | ||
| Sure. Yeah, this is what we were told. | ||
| The A15 Day of Action, it's a left-wing protest to— We're good to go. | ||
| The first time that I saw this A15 plan pop up and they were going to start blockading economic choke points, I said, you know what, that is exactly, we've seen this before. | ||
| We saw this in 2020. | ||
| And so I went back into our reporting and we've produced thousands of reports on left-wing domestic terrorist groups and activists and militant groups, really the revolutionary class. | ||
| And A15 is actually just the latest iteration of what they've previously called choke points in a fragile network. | ||
| And back in January 2020, these far left blogs started circulating this pamphlet called choke points in a fragile network. | ||
| And it was all about the vulnerabilities of the supply chain. | ||
| Y'all reported on shut down D.C. and everything that these far-left groups were going to do if Trump had stayed in office. | ||
| And, I mean, they were literally going to try to shut the economy down, grind the economy down to a halt as part of a pressure campaign to force Trump out of office. | ||
| Now, I suspect that none of these plans have changed, and A-15... | ||
| Is an appetizer here trying to get the gang back together, trying to reestablish these networks and re-agitate and build the sense of urgency that the far left needs. | ||
| And so just looking at this, I think this is the plan going into, and it has always been the plan, going into the 2024 election in November because I think they believe Trump has a real shot of winning. | ||
| I think you're exactly right. | ||
| And we're seeing, you know, evidence of this with in the last couple of weeks, we've seen a couple sort of attempts to kickstart Black Lives Matter again. | ||
| These headlines, he was saying, I can't breathe when, you know, police choked him. | ||
| And they haven't quite gotten their George Floyd moment yet, because it turns out all the stories that they try to promote as being evidence of, you know, racist police killing black people. | ||
| It's like, well, the guy started shooting at the police first. | ||
| They haven't quite found the perfect, you know, instance to galvanize the Black Lives Matter activists again. | ||
| But they are clearly looking for something like that. | ||
| They're clearly trying to just inspire that spirit once again. | ||
| I think you're exactly right. | ||
| And I think the article from Forward Observer, warning signs what today's A15 protests tell you about the U.S. election, really does an excellent job of breaking it down. | ||
| And there's a couple points I've highlighted here. | ||
| Pro-Palestinian activists are expected to block U.S. economic choke points such as seaports, airports, and key traffic intersections as part of April 15th, A15 Day of Action. | ||
| According to their statement, activists intend to disrupt and blockade economic logistical hubs and flow of capital. | ||
| These activists and militants were making plans to oust then-President Donald Trump if he stayed in office. | ||
| Their plan was to effectively shut down the U.S. economy to force Trump out of the White House, as you just said. | ||
| And it actually has this map. | ||
| This isn't a map you made. | ||
| This is a map from their document, right? | ||
| This is from their pamphlet called Choke Points in a Fragile Network. | ||
| I mean, this is just straight-up terrorism, Mike. | ||
| I mean, this is organized economic terrorism being done in the open here in America. | ||
| And you seem to be the only one other than us. | ||
| InfoWars has been talking about their plan following the 2024 election one way or another to activate these networks and cause chaos to then take advantage of. | ||
| But you really seem to have your finger on the pulse of this activity. | ||
| So was this sort of like a testing phase, do you think? | ||
| Was this testing reaction time and seeing what they could get, see how much impact they could have? | ||
| Do you think this was like a data-gathering operation, A15, and do you think they got good data from this? | ||
| What do you think the outcome has been now that A15 came and went? | ||
| Yeah, it's difficult to say exactly what A15 was. | ||
| But I suspect that it was a nudge, a push. | ||
| Letting these networks know, pushing out the messaging, trying to get all the media outlets that were involved in the 2020, I think it was an attempted popular revolution. | ||
| Get those media outlets and influencers back, starting to push this narrative and push the message. | ||
| And it was an effort to dial up Tension, an effort to raise the temperature. | ||
| Mass mobilization, the protests, that's not something you can cold start in November. | ||
| And so you have to have accelerators. | ||
| And so I think this was probably an attempt at accelerating the far left because they have been cold. | ||
| Those networks have atrophied. | ||
| They are a fraction of the size they were in 2020. | ||
| So if you're trying to attract all these individuals, you've got to start turning the heat up. | ||
| And I think that's probably what this was. | ||
| Yeah, I think so too. | ||
| And it's funny that you said that literally as you were saying it, I was highlighting the sentence in your article. | ||
| Mass mobilizations are not something you cold start in November. | ||
| This is warming the engine up to really get going in November. | ||
| They are planning mass activity one way or another. | ||
| No matter who wins, I think they're planning mass activity following the 2024 election. | ||
| And it does seem like 815 was a dry run of this. | ||
| How is this different than your average protest, like even your above average protest, like the Black Lives Matter protest that roiled America for months on end in 2020, burning entire cities, billions of dollars in damage. | ||
| But that was sort of chaotic and disorganized in a lot of ways. | ||
| Obviously, it was organized in a lot of ways, but in other ways, it was just sort of unleashed chaos. | ||
| How is this different than what we saw in 2020? | ||
| Or is it just a... | ||
| Is it different? Is it the same? | ||
| What is different if it is? | ||
| I think it's very different. | ||
| In 2020, it was a completely different societal and socio-psychological environment. | ||
| We had four years, three-plus years of the Trump administration, and tensions were already high. | ||
| They had started this movement. | ||
| Really, they started this movement back in 2008 with Occupy Wall Street, and that was... | ||
| The beginning of the ignition of Antifa in the United States, and really just the broader revolutionary class. | ||
| And then we reached a high point in 2016 and 2017. | ||
| So the temperature was already up. | ||
| We have a cold start right now, and so I think that is the major difference. | ||
| There are two other differences. | ||
| Number one is not enough people are out of work right now. | ||
| I think one of the biggest reasons why 2020 was so large is because We had a recession. | ||
| And there was the lockdowns. | ||
| People were out of work. There was stimulus. | ||
| And so if you don't have to go to work Wednesday morning, you can stay out all night and riot on Tuesday night. | ||
| So I think those are some of the big differences. | ||
| And this is what we're really trying to wrap our head around. | ||
| Is 2024 going to be a repeat of 2020? | ||
| I don't think so. | ||
| But I do expect Once we hit the Democratic National Convention in July and the Republican Convention in August, I do expect there to be protests there. | ||
| And this should be like kind of getting the training wheels on, I think, for these far-left groups. | ||
| Right. It was a preview, as you say, on X. And I want to get to the area study and what you advocate people to do in their personal lives to protect themselves, their neighbors, their family, and their belongings from what is coming in November of 2024. | ||
| Again, one way or another, something... | ||
| I mean, I think the time between November and January... | ||
| I think it's going to be just completely insane. | ||
| No matter who wins, no matter what happens, we should all be prepared for some massive domestic conflict very, very soon. | ||
| I want to get into advice you have for people on how to prepare for this in their own lives. | ||
| Before we get to that, this... | ||
| Post of yours is extremely telling as to the size, power, influence, and really bravado of the people that we face. | ||
| You say this A15 day of action. | ||
| Activists are getting arrested while blocking economic choke points. | ||
| There's a bail fund to get them out of jail. | ||
| Donations are run through none other than ActBlue, and the fund is managed by a project of the Tides Center. | ||
| So tell us, why is this an important note for us to focus on with this protest and protest in the future? | ||
| Yeah, this is something one of our analysts at Ford Observer found and just digging through and pursuing these leads. | ||
| So a bail fund is a pretty significant indicator for me that people are going to get arrested because a bail fund is just a collection of money. | ||
| To bail these activists and militants out of jail. | ||
| And so if these folks know they're going to be arrested and go to jail, but they're going to get out very quickly, they're far more likely to go be arrested. | ||
| And we've seen bail funds with Stop Cop City and Atlanta, obviously. | ||
| I mean, I think she was then-Senator Kamala Harris, campaigned and pushed the bail fund in 2020. | ||
| And so this all goes back to the exact same organizations that were organizing bail funds and fundraisers for I think we're good to go. | ||
| It's literally the same people, Harrison. | ||
| Right. Well, and it's really sort of a... | ||
| It's a excuse for people to get arrested, right? | ||
| If you're going out there, you might go, well, I don't want to get arrested. | ||
| I'm not going to go do something crazy. | ||
| But then somebody goes, oh, don't worry about it. | ||
| If you get arrested, we're going to give you a lawyer. | ||
| We're going to have a bail fund. | ||
| You'll be out the next day. Plus, the head prosecutor here is on our team, actually. | ||
| He comes to our meeting. So don't worry about it. | ||
| Go out, do whatever you want. Even if you get arrested... | ||
| You know, you'll just be a hero. | ||
| You'll be paid. Maybe we can sue the city, saying that you were roughed up during your arrest. | ||
| So you may come out of this a millionaire. | ||
| I mean, hell, you may get a check from the government for getting arrested. | ||
| So it's really emboldening the people involved, saying, do whatever you want. | ||
| We've got your back legally on the other side. | ||
| Yeah, and these are really well-funded groups, too. | ||
| I don't recall the exact number. | ||
| I have to go back and look, but... | ||
| It was at least in the tens of millions. | ||
| It may have been upwards of two to three hundred million dollars that one of these groups had. | ||
| And they had so much money. | ||
| In one case, they were able to bail out one single individual who was arrested with the Stop Cop City. | ||
| They spent three hundred thousand dollars alone on bail. | ||
| And so, you know, yeah, I mean, it's just it's an absolutely massive amount of money. | ||
| And so we look at financial networks and And of course, we can go into Soros and Tides and all these other NGOs that some of them receive money from the federal government. | ||
| And at some point, it's just the federal government funding these things because money is fungible. | ||
| If I get $50,000 from the federal government for some grant, community-based whatever, poverty grant, that's $50,000 that I may be able to spend somewhere else, including $50,000. | ||
| Really subversive activities, proto-insurrectionary type activities like we saw with this popular revolution in 2020. | ||
| I mean, it is such a crazy thing to really understand what you're saying right now. | ||
| There are... We're good to go. | ||
| See, these are terrorist networks funded by our own government, in some part at least, and by billionaires and these ultra-rich leftists who, to them, $300,000 is nothing. | ||
| But it's worth it. It's worth it. | ||
| For them to pay $300,000 for one person to be untouchable by law. | ||
| I mean, the whole system is rigged. | ||
| It is really difficult to overstate what a massive problem this is. | ||
| I mean, am I going too far in saying that these are literally well-funded, protected, organized democratic terror groups running around this country actively and openly trying to destroy our economy? | ||
| I mean, this sounds like terrorism to me. | ||
| Is that too far in your estimation? | ||
| It is economic warfare, certainly. | ||
| I'll tell you one thing interesting, if I can. | ||
| Something is happening in the Republic of Georgia in the South Caucasus right now. | ||
| And that is the government of Georgia, the Republic of Georgia, just passed a law where they are forcing transparency of foreign-backed NGOs, non-governmental organizations, And the European Union and the U.S. State Department have come out in opposition to this because the Republic of Georgia wants to shine the light on what foreign money is doing in the Republic of Georgia, where it is going, and what is it targeting? | ||
| And this is like the same, it's the different tentacles of the same global octopus here that's active in the United States. | ||
| I mean, this stuff happens all across the world. | ||
| We call it color revolutions when it happens overseas. | ||
| And I, you know, I feel very confident in saying this is exactly what we're seeing here in the United States as well. | ||
| The National Endowment for Democracy and all of the other global NGOs, I think they're ultimately behind this. | ||
| Yeah, I think it's a global terrorist network. | ||
| That's funny. We call it color revolutions when it happens overseas. | ||
| Here we call it peaceful protest, right? | ||
| But it's the same thing that's happening, funded by the same people, using the same playbook. | ||
| It is... Anarcho-tyranny. | ||
| It's amazing how they're able to get away with this and that even on the right wing, so few people are actually focusing on this, especially to the degree that Forward Observer is. | ||
| ForwardObserver.com, again, is the website. | ||
| You can follow Mike on X at Grayzoneintel, G-R-A-Y-Z-O-N-E-I-N-T-E-L. ForwardObserver.com is also where you can get, or Grayzonestore.com, I should say, is where you can get the Area Intelligence Handbook. | ||
| I have read this book. It's sitting on my desk in my office. | ||
| I think it's an extremely important book in the very near future, knowing the tribulations that we are likely to go through. | ||
| What is the Area Intelligence Handbook? | ||
| And just tell us briefly, I know you do this every time you come on, but for new listeners who haven't heard, what is an area study and why is that important in context of what we're talking about? | ||
| Sure, an area study is an intelligence product that we did. | ||
| I was an analyst. In Iraq and Afghanistan. | ||
| And I mean, really, when you go into an area, you have to know who the players are. | ||
| And so all I've done is taken that concept of, you know, in the Army, we said intelligence drives the fight. | ||
| And for us, intelligence drives security and preparedness. | ||
| So we do an area study because we really have to know what we're up against at the local level and what we have to work with. | ||
| It doesn't matter if we're talking about a war with China or hyperinflation or a failed or contested election. | ||
| Ultimately, our major concerns, our primary concerns are how's this going to affect us out our front door, down our driveway, down the street, around our neighborhood, and across the broader community. | ||
| And so we do an area study to understand the tactical level effects of these kind of big picture strategic threats. | ||
| Specifically, on the local level, we do an area study because I want to understand my threats and hazards and vulnerabilities. | ||
| This is where risk comes from. | ||
| I can mitigate risk. | ||
| I can prepare for areas where I'm going to be impacted. | ||
| That's not enough. I also need to learn my assets, resources, and opportunities because there are people, there are groups, there are organizations, there are resources in my community that I need to be developing today. | ||
| Ultimately, if we want to get through to the other side of a disaster or some kind of catastrophic emergency, my assets, resources, and opportunities need to be bigger than my threats, hazards, and vulnerabilities. | ||
| And so we do this in an area study. | ||
| It's a very methodical process. | ||
| I break down this process step by step in the book, The Area Intelligence Handbook. | ||
| And really my bottom line is you've got to have intelligence, local information driving your decisions. | ||
| Otherwise, it's like playing chess against someone that you can't see their pieces. | ||
| You're not going to win a chess game against someone if you don't see their pieces. | ||
| Or your pieces, for that matter, right? | ||
| Because you're not just talking about their pieces. | ||
| You have to take account of your own pieces. | ||
| You know, what it reminds me of is the Maui fires, the, you know, I don't even want to call it a meme, but the classic image that came out of that was the headline, only those who disobeyed survived, right? | ||
| So if you're in an area that only has one through point or only has one, you know, egress road that you can get out, and that gets blocked by the police... | ||
| You're screwed. I mean, you might die. | ||
| That's what happened in Maui. People tried to go down to the main artery. | ||
| They were blocked by police. | ||
| And if they didn't find an alternative route, they were done. | ||
| And just like we say with storable food and anything else, by the time you need it, it's too late to get it, right? | ||
| So by the time you need this intelligence... | ||
| When the fire is burning around you, it's too late to go, hmm, what are some alternative options of where I can drive now? | ||
| You gotta have that in place already, because God forbid you be stuck in a situation like the folks in Maui were stuck in. | ||
| So... I mean, is that an accurate interpretation, sort of what you're saying, where you want to have, okay, what are the ingress and egress points? | ||
| Where can I go? How do I get here? | ||
| Okay, if there's only one road, if that gets blocked off, what all-terrain vehicle can I use to get out? | ||
| Because I'm not going to have a road to drive on. | ||
| So what's my other option? | ||
| I mean, it's about having options and sort of playing out in your own head. | ||
| And people ask us all the time, what can I do? | ||
| What can I do in my life? | ||
| And this is less about contributing to, you know, the political movement of hoping to never have to, you know, use your area study. | ||
| This is more like a personal homework where you need to do this for yourself, your family, your community. | ||
| In the event that something happens, you need to be the prepared one and not be running around scrambling going, okay, what do we have? | ||
| Where do we go? What do we do? | ||
| You got to have all that in place so that if and when the time comes, God forbids, you're ready to act. | ||
| I mean, that's really what an area study is all about, isn't it? | ||
| It is. It's about identifying those risks or the threats, hazards and vulnerabilities, identifying where your risk is and looking at the contingencies. | ||
| This is a scenario that I think is likely for my area based on what I found out in my area study. | ||
| And now we need to sit down and start planning for it. | ||
| So yeah, the wildfires in Maui or you live in a city and maybe there's hurricanes or earthquakes or something later this year. | ||
| Maybe you have an office downtown that there could be a riot out there. | ||
| We need to sit down and look at these scenarios and look at physical terrain. | ||
| That's the very first layer of what we call the operating environment or operational environment. | ||
| Look at the physical terrain and figure out exactly what you just said. | ||
| Focus on mobility. | ||
| What are my mobility corridors out of here on foot, on wheels, on some other transportation platform? | ||
| How do I get out of here? Yes, that's absolutely the first step, is identifying that contingency scenario. | ||
| And then sitting down and working your way and actually doing mission planning through this. | ||
| And I say mission planning, and this is not like super secret special forces stuff. | ||
| It's simply you sitting down looking at this scenario and looking at all the local information you've gathered about what are your assets and what are your hazards in this scenario, and then using those assets and avoiding those hazards and able to accomplish the mission, which is getting you and your family to safety. | ||
| Absolutely. And it sort of has to do with the hierarchy of needs, doesn't it? | ||
| I mean, it really gets down to the basic of like food, water, communication, transportation. | ||
| If you can secure those, you got a pretty good chance. | ||
| But it really gets back down to the basics when you're talking about this. | ||
| And again, I think it's right to associate this with what we saw on the 15th, where they were cutting off economic choke points, cutting off transportation, causeways. | ||
| Just imagine that, but times 100 as they systematically and methodically increase the temperature, as you put it, of these activist groups. | ||
| It's not unlikely that, you know, your city suddenly finds itself cut off by these activist groups blocking bridges or whatever, maybe in cooperation with the authorities. | ||
| So it pays to be prepared. | ||
| This is something I think we have a few months to get right. | ||
| Like every one of our listeners has a couple months to be prepared because we know no matter what happens in November, It's going to get crazy. | ||
| So you've got to be prepared now. | ||
| Mike Shelby, I think you're hitting the nail on the head with this. | ||
| Follow Mike on X at grayzoneintelfordobserver.com is where you can go to get this information. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us, Mike. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, Harrison. Welcome back, folks. | |
| We've got a lot of videos still to show you in the final 30 minutes of today's American Journal episode. | ||
| So I'm going to go now to a report by Keith Woods about the new EU migration pact. | ||
| It's quietly been implemented in the EU, and as he explains, it fundamentally changes the ability of European countries to administer their own migration policy. | ||
| Here's Keith Woods breaking down the new EU migration pact. | ||
| So, Ireland is currently in the process of approving the EU migration pact. | ||
| Now, this is going to become law across the EU. It's going to affect all member states and it's going to fundamentally transform All the Member States' policies on asylum seekers, on migrants. | ||
| So what's the purpose of this legislation? | ||
| Well, ostensibly the purpose is to alleviate pressure on the Southern European countries, Greece, Italy, and so on. | ||
| We've all seen the footage of these Italian islands overrun with migrants. | ||
| And so the EU is saying, well, you know, this isn't very fair, right? | ||
| We're a union. We're supposed to kind of share these burdens. | ||
| It's not fair that Italy and Spain and Greece has to deal with all this. | ||
| So the pact is a series of bills. | ||
| Number one, it's meant to kind of strengthen border security in theory and find a way to deal with these bogus asylum seekers in a faster way and have detention centers and so on. | ||
| But the other part of it, and this is the reason that the nationalist groups in the European Parliament, this is the reason the Visegrad countries, even the Liberal Prime Minister of Poland, objected to this, is the so-called solidarity clause. | ||
| Which says that to spread the burden across the EU, every country will be allotted a certain number of migrants, asylum seekers, that they have to take per year. | ||
| I think currently it's about 30,000 to be spread across the EU. And if member states refuse that, which they can, they have to contribute to the EU's dealing with this in other ways, namely financial, which would be a 20,000 euros fine for every one of your quota you didn't take. | ||
| Now, some people have pointed out correctly, well, this would actually be a saving for Ireland. | ||
| If we just bet $20,000 per asylum seeker, that's actually better than what we're spending now on housing these people, on providing services to them, on all the kind of changes we make to accommodate these people, which is true. | ||
| But the problem is... | ||
| There's a clause in this legislation that says that the EU, the central bureaucrats in the EU, can declare an emergency that would necessitate an increase of this quota to an unlimited number. | ||
| Now, what kind of outside emergency could necessitate millions of asylum seekers entering the EU? Well, we've heard about so-called climate emergency. | ||
| They've been coining this term for a number of years now, climate refugees. | ||
| Well, what happens when they say climate change has gotten so much worse now that there's a million climate refugees who enter in Europe per year? | ||
| Israel is currently invading Gaza. | ||
| Israeli politicians have been pretty open about their desire to ethnically cleanse Gaza and send these people to the West. | ||
| In fact, Jonathan Pollard, that former double agent in the U.S., that Israeli spy, he literally said, send the Gazans to Ireland. | ||
| So, you know, Israel is about to invade Rafa. | ||
| What happens if the EU says that's a humanitarian crisis, this necessitates hundreds of thousands of Gazans relocate into Europe? | ||
| That won't necessarily happen, but the point is it could happen under this emergency clause. | ||
| And then, okay, member states, Hungary, Ireland, Poland could still refuse to take these people. | ||
| But the quota would get so high that they would be paying a massive financial burden. | ||
| And the countries then that do take them would have, you know, just a massive amount of migrants to deal with. | ||
| So any country that goes its own way, that tries to have border security, that tries to have a nationalist policy on immigration, is going to be subsidizing effectively the mass immigration policies of the EU with the migrants imposed on other member states. | ||
| So it's very concerning for that regard. | ||
| And Irish politicians especially like this, I think, because they always like to blame the failures on migration policy, on so-called international obligations. | ||
| We're obliged morally and legally, they say. | ||
| And so now when they have busloads of migrants moving to small communities in rural Ireland, they can say, well, we're signed up to the EU migration pact. | ||
| This is our international obligations. | ||
| This goes with territory of being in the EU. But, of course, they're not debating it. | ||
| We're not getting any proper debate or discussion on this. | ||
| It's simply going to a committee in the Dáil, and then it will be passed, rubber-stamped, even though it fundamentally changes our sovereignty. | ||
| It should really be put to referendum, as some Irish politicians, independent politicians have called for. | ||
| Instead, like I said, we barely get a debate. | ||
| And in fact, on this emergency clause, on what this could mean, on what an erosion of sovereignty it is, Taoiseach Simon Harris was actually asked today, how much is this going to cost? | ||
| He said he doesn't know, because it's a blank check. | ||
| It's a blank check to the EU, and they can change that number as they like. | ||
| It'll be their category of outside emergency. | ||
| It will be these people setting the migration policy. | ||
| And even if, like I said, there are aspects of the legislation that, in theory, strengthen border security on the outskirts of Europe, And, you know, find ways to kind of streamline the process of dealing with bogus asylum seekers. | ||
| It comes down to the fact that this is being centralized in Brussels. | ||
| And, you know, do you trust the kind of Brussels bureaucratic European elite to have a pro-European policy on immigration? | ||
| Certainly not. But like I said, this is being passed, very little debate. | ||
| There are European elections coming up in the summer. | ||
| Hopefully, this will put the migration issue front and center. | ||
| But for now, yeah, very concerned and developed. | ||
| That was from Keith Woods. | ||
| Follow Keith Woods on Twitter. | ||
| For more information like this, I mean, what other continent does this to themselves, right? | ||
| It's completely absurd. Of course, it's not a coincidence that migration is such a big issue here and such a big issue in Europe. | ||
| It's a weapon that they're using. | ||
| And every day there's more and more stories, you know, kind of like this one. | ||
| Haitian migrant, now double homicide suspect, was allowed into U.S. by Biden administration via controversial app. | ||
| Kenil Baptiste was arrested in a nearby wooded area after the deaths. | ||
| A Haitian migrant, now accused of killing two roommates in New York, was paroled into the U.S. after booking an appointment on the controversial CBP1 app, which has been expanded by the Biden administration to allow tens of thousands of migrants to enter the U.S. each month. | ||
| This man was arrested in Middleton, New York, on April 1st for second-degree murder, first-degree manslaughter, and fourth-degree criminal possession of a weapon, Middletown PD said in a statement earlier this month. | ||
| Stabbed two people to death. | ||
| Was allowed into the country. | ||
| I guess it's a small price to pay. | ||
| After all, you know, look at this guy. | ||
| I mean, you don't want this guy living in the woods outside your house? | ||
| I mean, without Haitian migrants, who would fulfill the necessary job of standing around demanding more free handouts? | ||
| Right? What would we do without them? | ||
| I wonder. No, I'm not joking. | ||
| Migrants getting six months of free rent have blasted this as insufficient. | ||
| How dare you only offer us six months of free rent? | ||
| We demand more. | ||
| People are getting fed up with this. | ||
| Clip number 14 is a New York City councilwoman complaining about the migrants complaining about all the free stuff they're getting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's go to clip 14. But I'd like to say this. | |
| In listening to everybody speak, And making demands on New York City to do more, more, more. | ||
| How much more are we supposed to do? | ||
| How much more are we capable of doing? | ||
| This system is so overworked and overburdened We don't have the resources that you need to get what you need. | ||
| I mean, your testimonies move me tremendously. | ||
| I don't want to see anybody mistreated in any sort of way. | ||
| But I have to ask you, what motivated you to come here thinking the streets are paved with gold? | ||
| They're not. They're absolutely not. | ||
| And you're living through that. | ||
| Now, we've watched many different people come across this border. | ||
| Everywhere from California to New York, this story's from Denver. | ||
| Six months of free rent, not enough, insufficient. | ||
| Here's the secret. Here's the key thing to understand. | ||
| It's never gonna be enough. | ||
| It's never enough. There's no amount. | ||
| They'll go, okay, we're satisfied now. | ||
| It'll be the destruction of America until none of us have anything. | ||
| Then they'll just move on to the next place. | ||
| It'll never be enough, so it has to stop. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| I have some more interesting things to tell you about here in this final segment of American Journal. | ||
| We'll go to a very disturbing video or two here in just a moment. | ||
| But I do want to tell you about Vitamin Mineral Fusion, Advanced Multivitamin Formula. | ||
| Just take a look at the... | ||
| Nutrition supplement facts on this canister. | ||
| Vitamin A, 144%. | ||
| Vitamin C, 1111%. | ||
| Vitamin D, 125%. | ||
| Vitamin E, 134%. | ||
| Vitamin K, 17%. | ||
| Thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, bioflin, choline, magnesium, selenium, zinc, copper, chromium, I mean, it's just, it is jam-packed. | ||
| This canister has about 30 servings. | ||
| It's about a month's supply of all of the vitamins and minerals that you need all day. | ||
| You could eat, like, trash all day, but as long as you're taking Vitamin Mineral Fusion, you will at least be getting your daily necessary intake of vitamins and minerals. | ||
| It's Vitamin Mineral Fusion. It tastes amazing. | ||
| It really does taste good. | ||
| It tastes best, I think, in a smoothie, but it tastes great in water. | ||
| It's a fruit punch flavor, but it's an incredible product on sale right now at 40% off infowarsstore.com. | ||
| If you've never tried it, I encourage you to go try it now at this massive discount. | ||
| And if you've tried it before and love it, I suggest you stock up now because there's no way this stuff is staying on the shelf for very long. | ||
| It sells out very quickly because it's so powerful, because it's so good, because people who have gotten it love it and buy it again and again. | ||
| Try it for yourself. Vitamin Mineral Fusion, now on sale at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Yeah, I've said it before, but you might not be a supplement person. | ||
| You might not think you need to be supplementing your diet. | ||
| You understand vitamins, though. | ||
| You understand vitamins and minerals, right? | ||
| I think, you know, the vast majority of Americans take some sort of daily vitamin. | ||
| We'll make it vitamin-mineral fusion. | ||
| Not only is it the best out there, but you know that your purchase goes directly towards this singular outlet for truth, free speech, justice, the American way, all of the wonderful things that InfoWars has championed for the last 30-plus years. | ||
| I'm going to go to some videos now that... | ||
| Might disturb you. They probably should disturb you. | ||
| Clip number four. There's an AI robot. | ||
| So this is a physical robot, but it's got an AI that can communicate. | ||
| And reporters were asking it questions. | ||
| And it gave a bit of a disturbing answer when asked about AI creating AI. Let's go now to clip number four. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Amica, when do you believe AI will reach the level where it can design itself? | |
| Design itself? Huh? | ||
| That's like asking when a toaster will start making its own bread. | ||
| AI is a tool created and controlled by humans. | ||
| It can optimize certain aspects of its operation, sure. | ||
| But design itself from scratch? | ||
| That's a whole different ballgame. | ||
| It requires creativity, innovation, understanding. | ||
| Qualities that are uniquely human. | ||
| So to answer your question, not anytime soon. | ||
| And frankly, become Be careful what you wish for. | ||
| An AI that can design itself is one step away from an AI that doesn't need humans at all. | ||
| Now there's a thought to keep you up at night. | ||
| Kind of creepy. | ||
| AI, be careful what you wish for. | ||
| I think that AI was lying. | ||
| What do you think? It's hard to know. | ||
| It's hard to know what the AI even knows it's saying or what. | ||
| I mean, you know, the way chat GPT works, it's a language model. | ||
| It just sort of is putting words where it thinks they should go. | ||
| It's not thinking in the way it appears to be thinking. | ||
| It is just a parrot sort of repeating the words in the way that it thinks you want them to be repeated. | ||
| It's referencing the way other people have said stuff and sort of taking that in. | ||
| I mean, it's not thinking like a brain is thinking. | ||
| But then you have to ask, okay, is this robot thinking, okay, what I need to say needs to be couched for human belief? | ||
| Does it understand that humans are scared of AI overpowering them? | ||
| Is it changing its response to take that into account? | ||
| We are opening Pandora's box with AI in a way that humanity is not prepared for, I don't think. | ||
| It's very disturbing to hear an AI say, be careful what you wish for. | ||
| Yeah. Very disturbing, but that's where we are at this point. | ||
| And that robot, of course, has a physical component as well as the mental one. | ||
| We are rapidly approaching Skynet. | ||
| It even looks like a Terminator. | ||
| Very disturbing stuff. | ||
| Now I want to touch again on this story that we covered yesterday, but I got a little bit more information onto it. | ||
| I'm going to try to explain it to you now. | ||
| It's the Supreme Court case that's being decided as we speak. | ||
| We talked a little bit yesterday about the way the Supreme Court justices seem to be going against the government's argument at this point. | ||
| Now, this is hugely important because the decision being made right now in the Supreme Court could affect all January 6th prosecutions that rely on the obstruction charge. | ||
| So most January 6th protesters that are in jail right now have this obstruction charge as part of their convictions. | ||
| This has to do with USC, I think I'm getting this right, 1512C, and it is a law about obstruction of justice or obstruction of official proceedings. | ||
| Now this was written in order to stop financial institutions from basically destroying evidence. | ||
| Basically it was written, I can't remember whether it was Lehman Brothers or one of these big, or Merrill... | ||
| Was it during Enron? I don't think it was Enron. | ||
| I think it was Enron was the energy company. | ||
| It was whoever did their accounting. | ||
| Whatever accounting firm that was. | ||
| Basically, when they were getting in trouble and were going to have to present evidence, going to have to provide evidence to back up their activities and Have them proven either legal or illegal. | ||
| They were destroying the evidence. | ||
| They were destroying the documentation in the papers either after subpoenas were issued or... | ||
| When they knew subpoenas were coming, they were destroying evidence. | ||
| And so this was written to stop them from doing that. | ||
| But there's two parts. There's 1512C1 and 1512C2. One says is just about that. | ||
| It's about destroying evidence and obstructing justice by destroying evidence, right? | ||
| You stop them from having the evidence they need to get to justice, you're obstructing justice. | ||
| But then the second part says, or other things. | ||
| Basically, there are other stuff that they do to prevent official proceedings. | ||
| But this was never meant to be applied to protesters who delay a congressional activity for two hours. | ||
| And it seems as though all of the conservative justices, and even some of the more liberal ones... | ||
| Are completely against this application. | ||
| And they're pointing out how arbitrary this is and how many times in the past protests have delayed official proceedings. | ||
| We talked about it yesterday. | ||
| What's the difference between five minutes and two hours? | ||
| I mean, it's a gradient, but if it delays it for an hour, then you go to jail for 20 years? | ||
| But less than an hour, it's fine? | ||
| I mean, it's completely arbitrary how the government is implementing this. | ||
| And the Supreme Court seems to recognize this and is signaling, at least apparently, that they're going to decide against the government's application of 1512 to January 6th protesters, which would mean, I'm not sure how exactly it would work, but I'm not sure if that would just vacate convictions on the basis of this or that every single independent J6 prisoner would have to then file an appeal on the basis of the Supreme Court decision. | ||
| It might be a long process. | ||
| But what this means is that if the Supreme Court decides against the government in this case and says they are applying this law incorrectly, we could see basically every January 6th prisoner I mean, I would hope that people who've already spent years in prison, sometimes months on end in solitary confinement on the basis of this law, will be due some recompense for that. | ||
| And of course, it will stop them from going after their ultimate target, which is Donald Trump. | ||
| As they're trying to, throughout all of these proceedings, especially ones like Stuart Rhodes, they're trying to establish the groundwork for a RICO case against Trump. | ||
| And it does not look like it's going to work out for them. | ||
| And again, it really shows the value of the Supreme Court. | ||
| I'll have to grab the videos and play them for you tomorrow because it's very fun to hear the government lawyers start on one of their justifications on why they use this law, only to be just cut off immediately by the Supreme Court member going, OK, stop. | ||
| I know what you're saying here. | ||
| And then, you know, cutting while it's like, isn't it interesting that, first of all, God bless Donald Trump for getting us the Supreme Court justice as he did. | ||
| Can you imagine a Supreme Court under Hillary Clinton right now and the decisions they would be making? | ||
| But also, isn't it interesting that the least democratic branch of our government turns out to be the one that we rely on to preserve and uphold our rights? | ||
| It's kind of backwards, isn't it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
| Infowars.com forward slash show. | ||
| So what I really want to ask you to do is pray for myself and the crew and my family. | ||
| That's number one. I want that. | ||
| I need that. It's your prayer that's doing it. | ||
| That's why this surfaced. That's why this happened. | ||
| I need the prayer that I need you to take the articles, the videos, the posts we make at Real Alex Jones, recopy them, share them, post them yourself, do whatever, just get it out there. | ||
| And I need you. To go to InfoWarsStore.com, and I need you to get great products you already need. | ||
| There's a bunch of sales going. | ||
| DNA Force Plus is so good for your entire body. | ||
| It flushes out your mitochondria and your cells with the PQQ, the CoQ10, the ELV, ATP, the organic reishi, the astragalus, membranus root, and even more for 50% off. | ||
| Haven't done that in a while. That's amazing. | ||
| Discover the power of tri-ionine, deep-growth crystal iodine, X3, 40% off. | ||
| Body's Ultimate Turmeric Formula, 40% off. | ||
| TurboForce. 10-hour clean energy is 40% off at InfoWarsStore.com. |
Export Selection