All Episodes
April 10, 2024 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:24:47
The American Journal: Canadian PM Trudeau Triggered Alex Jones Supports His Opponent - FULL SHOW - 04/10/2024
Participants
Main voices
c
chase geiser
01:21:24
Appearances
a
alex jones
04:52
g
greg reese
03:20
j
jim jordan
02:45
l
laura ingraham
01:56
m
marjorie taylor greene
01:54
m
michael yeadon
02:55
m
mike benz
03:42
Clips
b
benny johnson
00:49
e
elizabeth warren
00:23
j
john kennedy
00:19
j
john roberts
00:18
j
justin trudeau
00:39
k
kamala harris
00:29
k
karine jean-pierre
00:53
k
kate bolduan
00:19
t
tommy tuberville
00:35
Callers
daryl in north carolina
02:19
icarus in wisconsin
01:18
jefferson in virginia
02:29
jen in georgia
01:11
matt in wisconsin
00:58
mike-2 in tennessee
00:41
sean in california
03:44
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
greg reese
On January 10th of 1963, 45 current communist goals were submitted to the congressional record.
Number 13 was, do away with loyalty oaths.
60 years later, on the very same day, Biden, Obrador, and Trudeau met in Mexico City for the Declaration of North America.
Which states a plan to unify North America under the ideas of diversity, climate change, migration, health, and regional security.
The beginnings of a North American Union, which is a step towards a one-world government.
According to law, elected officials must swear an oath that they will support, defend, and bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
And through the Freedom of Information Act, U.S. Attorney Todd Callender, along with his team at Project Proper Oath, found that not a single member of the existing Cabinet has a valid oath of office.
U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen has no oath of office.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has no oath of office and has also failed to register as a foreign agent, which is required due to serving on the boards and conducting international business with Raytheon, Nucor, and Tenet Healthcare.
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland has no oath of office.
U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has no oath of office.
U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas has no oath of office.
U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg has no oath of office.
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra, responsible for declaring a national emergency during COVID, has no oath of office.
Former Director of the Centers for Disease Control Rochelle Walensky had no oath of office.
U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith, responsible for investigating the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack, has no oath of office.
U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Matthew Graves, Chief Prosecutor of Jan Sixers, has no oath of office.
Vice President of the United States Kamala Harris has no oath of office.
Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office.
And it appears as if no elected officials in the federal government have one.
They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent.
The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words, so help me God, are in all caps.
In the U.S. Constitution, so help me God is not in all caps.
And this matters, as many have been telling us for decades.
Including the great Jordan Maxwell.
unidentified
Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law which is referred to as the Law of the High Seas or International Maritime Admiralty.
When you were born, you came out of your mother's water.
Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product.
This is why, when you were born, the doc has to sign your birth certificate.
It's a maritime ability manifest.
Showing that your mother brought you into the world and you were going to make money.
Anything in this country, if it's a lawful, legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters.
Why? Because you do not own your body.
You do not own yourself.
All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product.
You are not a human.
You're not a living entity.
You are a product. You're a living entity person.
The actual you is represented under law by upper and lower case name.
So you are a corporation whether you know it or not.
But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called United States.
This is the way the law works.
greg reese
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
unidentified
It's Wednesday, April 10th in the year of 2024. store. April 10th in the year of 2024. store.
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
I'm back inside looking.
chase geiser
Welcome back to the American Journal.
Ladies and gentlemen, I have Chase Geiser, your host this morning, filling in for the great Harrison Smith as he is covering the War Room until Alex Jones is back in studio on Friday.
It's going to be a crazy week.
You know, usually Wednesday means you're halfway through the week, but as I understand it, Alex is going to be back hitting the ground, rolling on Friday.
I think he's going to do an emergency broadcast on Saturday as well as an ex-space on Friday.
And of course, we have the Sunday shows on Sunday night.
So there are no days off in war.
There are no vacations from war.
So, we're going to be hitting the ground running to really get the ball rolling.
Obviously, a lot of crazy developments yesterday and crazy escalations all over the world, as is usual.
The first thing I want to dive into is this clip.
This is number 21. This is Justin Trudeau going on a deranged Alex Jones rant while debating Pierre Puliver.
So, it's fascinating to me how...
The world's supervillains pay so much attention to Alex Jones and Infowars.
They try to act like we're totally irrelevant, that we've been deplatformed, that we don't have nearly the listeners that we used to have.
And frankly, that just isn't true.
And if it were true, then why is it that you would hear from people like Hillary Clinton complaining about Alex Jones or Justin Trudeau complaining about Alex Jones in front of Parliament in Canada?
unidentified
Let's go ahead and run the clip. The parliamentary budget officer's report which confirms 60% of Canadians pay more than they get back.
The prime minister said, and I quote in 2015, Canadians need a PM who will meet with the premiers.
What happened? The right honourable prime minister.
justin trudeau
While the Conservative leader continues with his misinformation and disinformation, the reality is the Parliamentary Budget Officer said that 8 out of 10 Canadians do better with our price on pollution and the Canada carbon rebate.
But speaking of misinformation and disinformation, any responsible leader that receives an endorsement and support from proven conspiracy theorist and liar Alex Jones would have immediately denounced Absolutely amazing.
unidentified
Absolutely amazing.
chase geiser
I don't know how it is that they don't understand that every time they criticize us, it just adds fuel to the fire because the world is beginning to recognize that they are, in fact, the world's supervillains.
From the man who called Fidel Castro a remarkable leader, photographed with him in an intimate embrace, rumored to even be his son, And I don't want to go down a rabbit hole that's unproven, but I mean, you can look at the pictures, the side-by-sides of Justin Trudeau compared to his alleged father versus Justin Trudeau compared to a young caster.
I'm not sure if the crew can Google and throw that up just for your reference.
Plus, there's all the circumstantial evidence that his mother nine months before he was born was off the coast of Cuba and they were close family friends and known philanderers, all of them.
The man who would call Fidel Castro after all the atrocities, all the human rights violations, all the just abundant violence, a remarkable leader, praise him and embrace him, would criticize a political opponent because Alex Jones endorses or supports or express any sort of affection for this opponent?
And I don't know if it was a focus group decision that Justin Trudeau was making where his team was like, hey, did you see what happened?
What's going viral on X? Alex Jones showed his support for your opponent.
And so he just decided to throw it in there.
Maybe he had it ready. It sounded like he might have had it ready, just holstered, ready to roll with that attack.
But the fact that these people are not only just paying attention to Alex Jones and InfoWars and what we're doing here, that adds credence to what we do.
But the fact that they don't understand that every time they attack us, it makes us stronger.
Every time they come out with a video trying to make fun of us or berate us or disparage us, we use it in an ad.
I mean if you think that's the last time you see that clip of Justin Trudeau on this network You're mistaken.
It's going to be in ads for years.
Just like when the brilliant Darren McBreen made the Who's Your Daddy ad campaign for Alex Jones' daddy.
And at the end, it's Hillary Clinton saying, Alex Jones, Alex Jones, over and over.
We use what the enemy says about us against them because everyone in the world is beginning to wake up and realize that these people are actually the supervillains.
And the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
So Alex Jones is your friend because he is the enemy of your enemy.
The New World Order, the globalists, the political elites.
And I know that being the Prime Minister of Canada is basically equivalent to being, I don't know, the mayor of Los Angeles.
I mean, if you look at the population, it's more like a governor here.
People think of Canada as a country because it's a giant landmass, but it's really just minor league in terms of national prowess.
It's off-brand America.
It's the Diet Coke of America.
It's Pepsi to Coca-Cola.
Not even Pepsi. It's more like a royal crown to Coca-Cola.
It's an RC. It's just weak sauce.
And their electoral process doesn't even require that any of their leaders have remotely close to a majority of support in order to get in office.
That's why you see so much tension in the political process in Canada right now.
I don't know what the exact number is, but isn't it the case that Justin Trudeau only had somewhere between 30% and 40% of the vote to make him prime minister because of the way the parliamentary process works?
And this is a man who claims in his recent videos and posts on his social media to be bolstering the defenses of Canada.
Strengthening the military power of Canada so Canada can defend itself in the north.
I think is what he said yesterday.
While simultaneously coming out and acting like it's such a good thing that, let me be clear, in Canada, you will no longer be allowed to buy or sell a handgun.
This is just effeminate mannerisms.
You can't even go to a restaurant without being just harassed by a slew of disgruntled constituents.
And I know that we've got our own problems here and I don't want to focus too much on Canadian news because I'm an America first person and it is tiresome to talk about the politics of Israel versus Gaza or Ukraine versus Russia or Taiwan versus China or what's going on in Canada with their laws that only apply to them.
It's tiresome.
But we have to look at these outside sources as foreshadowing for what is to come here if we embrace, as a nation, leftism.
If we embrace, frankly, globalism.
They're the same thing.
It used to be in this country that we had a left and a right.
We had those on the right who advocated for protecting the Constitution, lower taxes, free market, more freedom, Second Amendment.
That was about it.
Christian values.
And then those on the left that were more progressive, like, hey, you know, don't hold us back with your dogmatic sentiments.
People should, yes, have freedom of religion, but also freedom from religion if they want.
We should have progressive ideals where the state recognizes gay marriage just as the church recognizes heterosexual marriage.
You know, those were the old school debates.
They were simpler. Obviously important, intense, heated at times, but they were much simpler.
But now leftism has morphed into globalism itself.
And I don't understand why it is that globalism is such an important topic of conversation on this network among our listeners who are enlightened, but totally disregarded in social circles.
So... You tune in to InfoWars.
We talk about globalism versus individualism or versus national sovereignty.
We bring up things like Davos, the World Economic Forum, UN, other globalist entities.
Do you understand what we're talking about?
You watch Steve Bannon on Steve Bannon's War Room.
He's going to talk about globalism.
Any serious conversation about the political climate of the world right now incorporates globalism as a major theme because it is the greatest threat to humanity.
It is the greatest political power that is Versioned out of World War II and impacted all global politics.
But if you were to go to a social function with your wife and hang out with maybe the neighbors in the neighborhood at a birthday party or some social event, if you were to go to a work event Politics is inevitable.
It'll come up because politics is so heated and divisive right now.
But you're not going to hear a lot of people actually arguing about globalism versus nationalism or globalism versus national sovereignty.
They might argue in favor of globalist policies like we have to support Ukraine no matter what because democracy versus dictatorship.
But you're not going to hear people actually argue about the philosophy of globalism itself versus the philosophy of national sovereignty.
Because people are just totally unaware that leftism has subtly shifted into globalism, and it's really obvious why.
If you look at the history of Marxism in the world, if you look at the history of Marxism, This left-leaning push, you realize that there's two philosophies going on.
The left is a philosophy of exploitation, and the right is a philosophy of opportunity without entitlement.
So there's exploitation and entitlement and opportunity with no entitlement.
That's the conflict. And so a leftist philosophy is not a philosophy that actually creates value.
It's not a productive philosophy that doesn't cause a civilization to make new things, to do new things, to innovate, to create value.
It can only empower a people within a civilization to exploit the value of an outside entity.
So, you can talk about the strengths of communism in China, but China's economy would be nothing without consumers in America buying all the products that their slave labor provides for cheap costs.
Or you can look at what happened to the Soviet Union.
It seemed like it was a strong economy.
It faked being a strong economy, but ultimately, when it had nowhere to expand or nowhere further to exploit, it totally collapsed.
You can't create value by increasing taxes.
That is just shifting existing value around.
That is just mining, harvesting resources around.
So leftism itself is inherently based off of exploitation and expansion.
It has to exploit and it has to expand because it is not a self-sustaining system of economics or government.
And that's why we've seen over the last several decades that leftism has morphed from progressive hippie values into globalism because you can't expand indefinitely and exploit indefinitely unless you adopt a global mindset.
During the Red Scare, we were terrified as a nation.
The intelligence community was terrified as a nation that Communism was going to spread like a disease, and to some extent they were right.
It certainly has spread.
It doesn't justify going into Vietnam.
That excuse was used to justify getting involved in Vietnam or Korea.
But it's true. It has to expand, whether it is South America or entire regions beyond the original source.
And that's what we've seen here with leftism.
In the name of protecting the interests of our people, in the name of protecting the most vulnerable among us and providing services and welfare to the disenfranchised or those who are victims of systemic injustice because their ancestors were slaves 160 years ago.
In the name of protecting our people's interests, leftism used that patriotism, that form of patriotism, that lie, as an excuse to garner as much power for itself so that it could then expand into the global market of political power and use outside forces to leverage, abuse, bully, and exploit our true American identity here.
I mean, I can't think of a single thing, a single problem that our country faces, substantial, I mean existential level problem, obviously there's little things here and there, that isn't a result of globalist influence on our people.
Do you think that the wide open border with over 10 million people now having come into the United States since the onset of the Biden regime doesn't have anything to do with global influence?
Do you think that the Chinese militants crossing into the United States weren't sanctioned by the CCP? Do you think that this war in Ukraine that we're pumping billions upon billions of dollars into while our people experience record levels of bankruptcy and credit card debt doesn't have anything to do with globalist influences?
Do you think calls all the way from the speaker to Chuck Schumer for bolstering the Indo-Pacific alliance and forces doesn't have anything to do with globalism?
The fight for Taiwan doesn't have anything to do with globalism?
Do you think that our support of Israel versus Hamas Doesn't have anything to do with globalism.
Globalism is the cause of every serious major existential threat to this country, yet it's not a topic of conversation, and I see no official policy position from either of the major parties on it.
If you were to go to the RNC website, or if you were to go to the DNC website, I find it very unlikely that the word globalism would even appear in any of the stated policies.
From either party. Every year, they print all their policies, their platform.
They put it in a PDF. Usually it's somewhere between 20 and 100 pages long.
The Democrats do it. The Republicans do it.
And you can find it on their websites and you can read what the policies are.
And they go through every major issue. They'll go through climate change.
They'll go through abortion rights.
They'll go through gun rights or reform.
There's an inverse, right?
Usually the same policies are touched on by both parties.
They just have the opposite take.
But I don't think you would find either one of them mention globalism, but that's the number one enemy of America right now.
After all, how can you have national sovereignty and globalism together?
How can you have individualism and globalism together?
I mean, there's nothing more antithetical to the globe than the individual.
And why is nobody talking to me?
Is it because it's boring or it's beyond midwits?
Is it because it's just too sophisticated of a political problem to have a conversation with the American people about?
Do they disrespect us so much?
Do they look down upon the American people so much that they just don't believe that we can handle talking about the nature and philosophy of globalism?
Because after all, that's some pretty complicated stuff and that word has too many syllables for the average person to understand.
Do they think that we're so pathetic?
Well, maybe they're right because it seems like so few people understand, but people are waking up because when push comes to shove and you start to begin to feel the pain and weight and suffering that comes as a result of corruption at the highest levels of your own government, you begin to start looking for a culprit.
You wake up in the morning and you find that your window of your car has been bashed in and somebody has gone through your things.
First thing you do is look around.
Are they still here? Who did it?
Somebody smacks you on the back of the head.
First thing you're going to do is turn around and look, see who it was.
And so right now we are at this pivotal moment in this country where our people, having been robbed and smacked around, are frantically looking for who the culprit is.
The answer, of course, is globalism.
My concern is that our people aren't aware enough, enlightened enough, informed enough, is a better term, to actually pin the blame on the right culprit.
It seems to me that the left has done an outstanding job in the name of their globalist policies of convincing every minority, every person of color in this country that all of their problems are as a result of white people, white supremacy, systemic racism.
They have gotten ahead of the problem.
They knew that there was going to be an increase in pressure among or upon the most vulnerable in our country.
The left knew that people were going to get poorer and the wealth gap was going to get wider and that people were going to suffer more and have more debt and less employment or have to work more jobs in order to make ends meet.
They knew that their policies would amount to an increased level of suffering among the most vulnerable people among us, namely those of color.
Not anything to do with systemic racism, but corruption from the party that's supposed to represent them.
And so they got ahead of it by instilling critical theory in all of our schools and institutions, ensuring that every professional and leadership of every major corporations, especially the Fortune 500 companies, adopted or was indoctrinated into the philosophy of Marxism, criticizing.
critical theory, which are synonymous.
So that when this pressure is felt at an increased level and those minorities among us begin to look around and want to point a finger, that culprit has already been identified.
They planted the seed.
It's been a psyop.
And despite the fact that 73% of this country is Caucasian and the vast majority of people in this country are not explicitly racist, at least they were not explicitly racist, Somehow the left has managed to get ahead of the story and convince a substantial number of millions of Americans that the enemy is just whiteness,
white people. I mean, how many videos do you see on social media every day or week of...
The most recent one I saw was this teacher yelling at some kids that were acting up in her class.
And you white boys have no respect.
You white boys, you white boys...
Don't get me wrong, I grew up in a public school system too, and we'd have teachers that would say, hey, you guys have no respect.
You guys are rotten.
You're being terrible. But they never say, you white kids have no respect.
You white kids are rotten. Can you imagine if a teacher was caught on film saying, you black kids have no respect?
How inappropriate that would be.
How everybody would just understand that that was wrong.
Just based on their immutable characteristic to classify them as inferior of character.
We're unable to behave or operate in civil society.
And there's video after video of that.
How many videos have you seen in the last week of just random attacks on white people, whether students or people walking in the street or in New York City?
And it's all because this narrative is being pushed because the left knows that when the entire system collapses, when the dollar collapses, when the World economy is on the brink of total disaster and desperation escalates at lightning speed the world over.
They already want everyone to default blame this group.
What's amazing to me about it is that traditionally speaking, when there's been this conspiracy to blame a segment of a population for the ills of the rest of the population, it's always been a minority that's been pinned.
Whether it was in Germany being the Jews, it was a small percentage of their population pinned with all of their problems.
Whether it was racism from the first half of the 20th century or second half of the 19th century in the United States of America, it was pinned on 13% of the population.
But in this case, somehow they've gotten so powerful on a psychological level, on a cultural level, the left, the globalists, Not only have they eradicated the conversation around globalism from any circle,
seemingly, the point where people aren't even aware that that's the number one threat to national security is globalism, but they have somehow successfully pinned the blame for all of our problems on 73% of the population instead of 13% of the population or instead of 1% of the population as civilizations in the past have done.
And on top of that, they have convinced a substantial portion of the large population, the 73%, that it is indeed their own fault of all our problems.
It has nothing to do with race.
It has everything to do with ideas, with values, with philosophy.
We have values.
They inform how we act.
So if you're Christian, you get your values from Christianity and they're supposed to inform how you act.
If you're Muslim, you get your values from Islam and they're supposed to inform how you act.
That's why different cultures have different outcomes because they have different values and different ideas that play out in the real world.
And now what we're seeing are these atheists at the top, these globalists who see themselves as gods with their terrible man-made ideas, with no divine inspiration, playing out these ideas in their actions, and it's going to result in the extermination of the species off the planet, Stick with us for more news on the other side.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
unidentified
I am Chase Geiser, your host this morning.
chase geiser
I don't think we have any guts for the show today, but we will be taking calls, maybe starting half past the next hour, certainly for the third hour.
I like to try to do an hour of calls every show just to hear back from the audience.
Make it more conversational.
But I spent the last segment rambling about globalism and how important it is and how it's amazing to me that nobody's talking about it in an official capacity at leadership levels.
I shouldn't say nobody.
There are a few. And I'm going to run clip two here.
This is Lloyd Austin confirming that NATO's stated goal is to bring Ukraine into NATO. So we saw Blinken last week say explicitly that Ukraine will be a member of NATO. That is a necessary condition of World War III. You get Ukraine into NATO, then if Russia attacks Ukraine after Ukraine is a member of NATO, that is legally, politically interpreted as an attack on the United States and other member nations, which...
Legalizes a military response from what would then be 33 members of NATO. That's World War III. So I don't know what purpose NATO has or the United States has of adopting Ukraine into NATO, if not explicitly to excuse military action.
Because... As it stands, Ukraine already has all of the support of virtually all the NATO members.
As it stands, they're being sent tanks, People to help train and in service.
They're being sent supplies, weapons, ammunition.
They are being given everything that a nation needs for a war except soldiers right now.
Because if we send soldiers, if anybody sends soldiers, that's officially war with Russia.
So the only reason to bring them into NATO is to excuse explicit hot military action, boots on the ground from all the NATO members.
Actual military assistance in combat.
That's the only thing they're missing from NATO that a membership would grant them.
So they're setting the stage for a war with Russia.
Maybe they're doing some 3D chess, and this is a leveraging chip or a strategy to call Russia's bluff.
But it seems to me like they're not bluffing, guys.
They invaded a country.
And I just want to run this clip.
This is clip number two, Lloyd Austin confirming this goal.
tommy tuberville
Yeah. General, can Ukraine win?
unidentified
Yes, yes.
tommy tuberville
What does that look like?
unidentified
Well, what we've said all along is we want to see Ukraine remain a sovereign, independent, democratic state that has the ability to defend its sovereign territory and deter aggression.
And that's been our aim from the very beginning, and it remains our aim.
But yes, they can be successful.
tommy tuberville
I heard Secretary Blinken say last week in Brussels that Ukraine will soon be in NATO. You agree with that?
unidentified
That's the goal of the NATO members is to, at some point, bring Ukraine into NATO. And that's certainly something that Ukraine wants to see.
tommy tuberville
If you're Russia, would you want that?
I'm just asking. I mean, we're playing games with Russia right now.
I just want to understand why we would do that.
unidentified
Certainly, if I was Russia, I would not want that, Senator.
I would also not want Finland and Sweden to be a part of NATO, and they are.
And the reason that they are is because Putin invaded his neighbor.
And, you know, without provocation, without justification.
And so that's why we are where we are.
And, you know, instead of making things better for himself, he enlarged.
He had the effect of enlarging NATO, which obviously creates worse conditions for him.
tommy tuberville
Do we have 12 CIA bases in Ukraine?
Can you answer that in this setting?
CIA bases? I got this out of the New York Times, which I don't read very often.
unidentified
I'll defer that question to the director of the CIA. Okay.
chase geiser
All right. Thank you. We know that there's been major operations in Ukraine for some time, whether it's bio labs, whether it's spy bases.
I saw reports the other day as many as 12 espionage satellite bases have been identified in Ukraine.
U.S. espionage.
And now Russia's coming out and alleging that Burisma has somehow been responsible for these escalations, directly funding even the terrorist attack on Moscow.
I don't know how true that is, so I'm not going to dive into it.
Of course, I'll just be accused of Russian disinformation.
And don't get me wrong, I know that the Russians are capable of disinformation and misinformation.
I understand what the KGB used to do.
I understand what the Soviet Union did.
I understand that Gorbachev stated that their power in the Soviet Union came from the perception of their power.
They tried to hide things like Chernobyl and cover things up.
I understand that they're a deceptive people.
But it doesn't mean that everything that they say isn't true.
And the bio labs evidence existed long before Russian allegations.
You can look at videos from some of the labs bragging about the labs.
They did promo videos for some of these labs.
Or some of the work that Metabiota, for example, was doing in Ukraine with viral research at these labs.
And so then, when I hear Russia come out and say that Burisma might have been involved in the funding of this attack on Moscow...
I don't immediately write it off.
It's definitely something that needs to be investigated or looked into just because Russia has a history of deception.
Or when I hear allegations that we had as many as 12 CIA operations and satellite bases in Ukraine, I don't immediately write it off as Russian disinformation because it sounds like something that we would do.
And they're always dancing around.
Democracy, this issue of NATO and these...
They always try to win both sides, right?
So we see rhetoric from leadership, Kirby, I believe, coming out and saying, we don't recognize the independence of Taiwan, but we also don't support any change in the region.
Well... The status in the region is that Taiwan is independent, as it is now.
So if you're not advocating for a change, then you're supporting Taiwan as an independent nation.
But at the same time, you're trying to tell China that you don't recognize or support Taiwan as an independent nation, and you're not calling it Chinese Taipei.
So you're trying to have your cake and eat it too.
Oh, we don't want an escalation or a war with Russia, but we do want Ukraine to join NATO, which would automatically cause an escalation in war with Russia.
unidentified
Oh, we don't want...
chase geiser
Civilians to die in Gaza.
But we do want Hamas to be totally eradicated.
Well, if you eradicate Hamas, you're going to kill civilians.
Because of the nature of the way that they do war.
And you can't have these double standards.
You can't have your cake and eat it too.
It's an oxymoron.
It's an immovable force meeting an unstoppable object.
It just doesn't make any sense.
And so what it does is evoke and catalyze and create confusion among all of the people while simultaneously some bizarre sense of trust in these leaders.
Oh, it sounds like we can have the good thing without the bad thing.
You guys sound like you have it under control.
So we just, by default, trust that our leaders have our best interests in mind, that their ideas, their values come from a legitimate source where they don't.
They're not top-down. They don't look to God for direction.
They look to themselves because they see themselves as gods.
And my disappointment is just in our own people.
It's like Lord of the Rings would have ended so much differently if it weren't for the Shire folk, for the average person, for the small people standing up and be willing to do whatever needs to be done for justice, for the right outcome, to fight evil.
That's the whole beautiful point of that book, that trilogy, is that if it weren't for the small guys, for the little guys, then Mordor would have won.
But I see a lot of people sitting around instead of standing up and declaring, I will take the ring to Mordor.
I will take the ring to Mordor.
Where are we folks?
unidentified
More on the other side. And Mike, can you talk more specifically about what that looks like in practice?
mike benz
Yeah, well, part of the issue is we're actually past that now.
That was, as Ben said, how the initial predicate was laid down.
This is something that I refer to as the foreign to domestic switcheroo.
The initial censorship structure in this country grew out of what was called the hybrid warfare doctrine that NATO came up with after the Crimea annexation.
And there was essentially a pan-military decision across NATO for the military to play a more active role in the media because they perceived a loss of hearts and minds in Eastern Europe as us ceding ground to Russia politically.
And then when Brexit and the Trump election happened, the Russia gate predicate was used to basically portray any sort of right-wing populism as being favorable for Russia and then so could be censored on the basis of being Russian propaganda.
The problem was when Russiagate died in the summer of 2019, when Mueller choked on the stand in the hearing, instead of shutting down that censorship apparatus that joined together the FBI and the CIA and DOD and State Department, They simply changed the predicate from being a Russiagate predicate to a democracy predicate.
And this is very nasty because democracy is the watchword of the foreign policy establishment to overthrow governments.
I'm just gonna say that again. Democracy is the watchword of the foreign policy establishment to overthrow governments.
So we've had a lot of presidents, Republican presidents, who have been tarred by left-wing media as being bad people, dictators.
People were calling George Bush a Nazi and things like that I remember in my lifetime.
They were not calling him a threat to democracy.
That triggers when something is categorized as a threat to democracy by our government.
What that does, it's like an immune system response that that activates for the white blood cells of our blob to descend the NGO swarm, the university centers, which act as proxies by the government and are all funded by our federal government, for DOD counterintelligence, for the State Department to get involved, for the FBI, for DHS, they all descend on it.
And they use their media organs as well.
Much of what we think about as being independent media is anything but They depend, and we can go through this in more detail maybe in questions, but this surround sound is a creation of this immune system.
And the fact that it no longer, even though it was created under this foreign policy national security predicate, we are now about four or five years past that.
And I'll give you just one great example to leave this off on.
The number one funder right now of the censorship industry in the U.S., and not the number one necessarily most, you know, top of the food chain, but who's providing the actual money, the civil society capacity building for domestic censorship mercenary firms is the National Science Foundation, which is basically the kissing cousin of DARPA. And National Science Foundation is the number one, it's the number one funder of all secondary research in the U.S. $10 billion goes to our universities, the National Science Foundation.
Which used a democracy – they created two programs, actually, during the Biden administration, which simply said misinformation is a threat to democracy.
And so they've given over $60 million just in the past year to specially constructed censorship labs, they call them, counter misinformation labs within universities.
It's now a growing profession.
Where undergraduates and PhD students are staking their professional careers on the rise of the censorship industry.
And it's all constructed around a democracy predicate, which again simply means the control and the ability to overthrow a government who's not doing the bidding of the U.S. foreign policy establishment.
unidentified
That's fascinating. And speaking of democracy, I'll ask both of you, what's in store for 2024?
chase geiser
Well, there you have it folks.
That was the closest thing I've seen to a serious panel or conversation on globalism.
Now the word globalism wasn't used, but all the concepts were there.
It is true that throughout our history, especially in the second half of the 20th century, basically after fascism and after the onset of communism, we branded democracy as the opposite of those things when, ironically speaking, democracy...
It's really the cause of both of those things.
Democracy is the leading cause of tyranny.
It's the leading cause of communism.
Everybody coming together, the people, and they're exacting their will as the mob over some minority that they deem to be the oppressor.
The oppressor versus oppressed mentality of Marxism.
And after World War II, we had two enemies.
We had communism, we had fascism, and we branded democracy as the antithesis to both those things.
We branded democracy as the opposite of the evils associated with communism and fascism, disregarding the fact that, historically speaking, democratic processes led to the empowerment of both those systems.
And I know that communism required violent...
Revolutions in many cases.
But it's based off of democratic principles.
Off of voting. I don't know.
Did you guys see the clip? This week of that professor explaining how you would get a PlayStation 5 or a PlayStation 4 in a socialist civilization.
I don't know if you can pull it up and find it.
It was going viral on Twitter a few days ago.
It is the funniest thing ever.
It argues for a democratic process if you want a personal item for yourself where all of your co-workers would have to agree that you are entitled to have that item.
It's so funny. You'll see it.
It was some stream with a live chat flying up.
I think Ian Miles Chong posted about it and others a couple days ago.
But the point is, democratic processes lead to this injustice.
But we branded democracy as the opposite of them.
And since it was instilled during the Cold War and the massive propaganda on the American people after World War II... Which in some ways was healthy because it was pro-American and Americanism and some of the greatest movies ever like Rocky IV and Red Dawn came out as a result of it.
So I'm not bashing propaganda altogether.
I bash propaganda when it's a lie.
This push for democracy has installed in our minds this software that we run.
Every time we hear the word, it automatically runs this software where several different principles are activated at the same time.
Everything we value, like freedom, justice, the people being heard, We're more inclined to support or follow or trust or believe what a leader says if they invoke the notion of democracy.
And now that's been used and abused to get us involved in war after war, to actually manifest our own tyranny over the world, they found the clip of this PlayStation 4.
Let's go ahead and run this.
unidentified
You have to see this, guys. Final question to you, Professor Wolf.
Under your system of worker cooperatives, would I still get my PlayStation 5?
Absolutely. You'd have to struggle a little bit for it.
You'd have to talk to your fellow workers.
You'd have to talk about the distribution of income.
You'd have to compare your desire for PlayStation against all the other interests of all the other people.
It wouldn't be something you worked out on your own with your particular boss in any way.
It would have to be a democratic decision.
You'd have to come to terms with that the way you do with democratic decisions now in our society to the extent that we have them.
chase geiser
So you see, communism, socialism, it's all based off of democratic principles.
goals.
Democratic principles to the limit.
Where if you want to roll a toilet paper, you better make sure that you get approval from your co-workers.
I'm going to go around and ask the crew, hey, you guys mind if...
I get a PlayStation 5 and I got a deal with CJ not really wanting me to have it and try to convince him that I'm entitled to it.
Come on! Come on!
So we see that even in this small way, it's indicative of how democracy leads to a tyranny, leads to an oppression, leads to a lack of freedom.
How can you possibly say that what that example of that asinine clip shows, how can you possibly say that that is an example of an increased amount of freedom of A greater degree of freedom and justice than a system of capitalism.
And critics say, oh, well, capitalism is a system that's based off of greed and selfishness.
Let me tell you something, folks.
Greed and selfishness are part of the human condition.
There's no system that's gonna eradicate those vices from individual human beings.
You think communism isn't based off of greed?
You think the Soviets weren't greedy?
Or the Chinese aren't greedy?
Or that Zelensky isn't greedy?
Or that Putin isn't greedy? Do you think that anyone in the world isn't greedy?
Greed is not the problem.
And if it were the problem, it's not a solvable problem.
You cannot eradicate a vice from the character of a people.
It's inherent to us.
We fell. So what you have to identify is a system that maximizes the benefit of greed of selfishness and reduces the risks of greed and selfishness.
So when Henry Ford wants to make as much money as possible he comes up with an assembly line and finds a way to make an automobile affordable for every single American.
Out of his own greed and selfishness, he actually helped humanity, advanced technology, brought us on to new horizons because the system of capitalism turns the risks and the expenses and the liabilities of greed into assets and value.
And they want to shut it down in the name of globalism because they realize that individual freedom and individual rights necessary for successful capitalism are not conducive to a political monopoly.
If they seek to maintain and expand their power indefinitely, infinitely, they have to reverse or inverse or reduce or destroy all freedom everywhere.
That's why globalism is the number one threat to national security matters.
laura ingraham
More news on this side. Biden administration hiding.
The Justice Department is refusing to comply with the House GOP subpoena to turn over audio recordings of Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Herr in that classified docs case.
An elderly man with a poor memory.
Remember, that's how Herr described the president in that written report submitted to the DOJ. Now, recall that Democrats circled the wagon for Biden after Herr's findings became public.
karine jean-pierre
It's flatly wrong. It is inappropriate.
It is gratuitous.
unidentified
Gratuitous, inaccurate, and inappropriate.
I talk to President Biden, you know, regularly.
jim jordan
His mental acuity is great.
laura ingraham
It's fine. Right.
It's worth noting that Schumer is still with it and is roughly the same age as the president.
So if Biden is as sharp as ever, like Chuck says, what are they worried about?
In fact, the audio recording should actually put the public's doubts to rest once and for all.
But the DOJ says Republicans' interest in securing them is not in service of legitimate oversight, but only serves political purposes that should have no role in the treatment of law enforcement files.
Joining me now, Congressman Jim Jordan, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.
Congressman, to the DOJ's point, What law enforcement purpose would the recordings or could the recordings in your mind advance?
jim jordan
Well, I think we've got to go back to the facts.
Remember the facts here.
Joe Biden knowingly kept and disclosed classified information.
Robert Hurst says in the report, the reasons he did that, on page 231, he said he had strong motivations for doing so and ignoring classified procedures because he was writing a book.
A book, by the way, that he got paid an $8 million advance.
So we know he met the elements of the crime.
He knowingly kept and disclosed information to the ghostwriter.
We know that we have a motive, $8 million motive, but yet the special counsel said, we're not going to recommend charges because he's a forgetful old man.
Okay, so he met the elements, but you're not going to do it.
We want to decide then, and yet you have the Democrats say, no, no, no, he's not a forgetful old man, and it's gratuitous for the special counsel to even say that.
Well, then let us have the audio tapes.
We can decide. We have a constitutional duty to do oversight, and frankly, the American people, we the people, would kind of like to know if that's the reason that someone who meets the elements was in charge, if that's the reason, Let the country evaluate that for themselves.
So give us the audio tapes, because you can always get so much more information from that.
You know this as a lawyer, that you can get more from that than you can just the transcript alone.
laura ingraham
Now, Joe Biden, Congressman, when he used to actually take questions from the press, shared some thoughts on what should happen to those who defy congressional subpoenas.
unidentified
What's your message for people who defy congressional subpoenas on the January 6th committee?
I hope that the committee goes after them and holds them accountable.
Do they be prosecuted by the Justice Department?
laura ingraham
I do, yes. Now, by that standard, should, you know, they be criminally prosecuted, should they not?
jim jordan
Well, there's definitely a double standard.
Think about this, Laura.
In the last three presidential elections, we've had three people run for office.
We've had President Trump, Hillary Clinton, President Trump, Joe Biden, and now again, President Trump and Joe Biden.
So three people. They've all had, there's all been concerns raised about how they handle classified information.
But only one is getting prosecuted, President Trump.
So that makes no sense to, I think, to the American people, particularly when you have the fact pattern I just described that Robert Herr, in his investigation, put forward in his report, and yet says, we're not going to charge him because he's forgetful old man.
So this idea that there's a double standard, which is exactly what Joe Biden was alluding to when he said, oh yeah, people who devise subpoenas should be prosecuted, they should be held in contempt, and on and on it goes.
That is not how it's supposed to work in our country.
It's supposed to be equal treatment under the law.
laura ingraham
Well, and I just keep remembering the Comey.
Remember the famous Comey presser or statement?
I shouldn't say presser. When he gets up and he lays out the elements of the crime and then says, well, we're not going to move forward with this.
It was the strangest thing ever.
jim jordan
Yeah, no reasonable prosecutor would move forward with this.
There were 30,000 emails that she destroyed.
She was moving classified information across this unsecured server and all kinds of things she did to destroy it.
Look, it seems to us to destroy evidence, bleach bit used to destroy things.
I mean, and yet no prosecution there, no prosecution with President Biden.
But of course, Jack Smith is going after President Trump.
The one guy, by the way, I would add, Who was actually president of the United States when the concerns were raised about how classified information was handled.
The one guy who has complete authority on whether something is classified or not.
That's the one who gets prosecuted, but not the other two.
laura ingraham
Congressman, always good to see you.
chase geiser
Thank you. Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Keiser. Harrison Smith will be hosting the War Room this afternoon from 3 to 6 p.m.
Central Time. And Ellen Schroyer will be hosting the Alex Jones show today.
I'm not sure if Alex is going to call in or not.
But Alex will be back in studio the day after tomorrow.
Obviously, there were a lot of major developments yesterday.
Regarding Alex, I think since I've been working here, yesterday may have been the day that he went more viral than any other day, with the possible exception of the day that he got his account back on X. But I was looking at the trending tweets.
I think there were over 100,000 tweets about Alex Jones yesterday, which is astronomical.
And it's because of this breaking undercover video.
CIA officer, former FBI, boasts we can put anyone in jail, set them up.
The FBI stating it did what we wanted with Alex Jones, took his money away.
CIA officer, former FBI official, is on an undercover video boasting about using the might of the federal government to jail anyone by setting them up.
I think we're good to go.
They can educate civilians on civil recourse or civil action they can take against individuals.
So, similar to how the federal government understands that it cannot explicitly violate our First Amendment right to freedom of speech.
It can't legally silence us or penalize us or criminalize us for the things that we say.
I can do things like lean on private business, social media platforms, as we saw with the Twitter files, or as we saw with what they did with Facebook over the laptop story where the CIA literally called Zuckerberg and told them to be aware of this story and that it was misinformation, as Zuckerberg himself admitted on Joe Rogan's podcast when he was a guest.
They lean on private entities to enforce the outcome that is otherwise illegal for they themselves to enforce.
That is the story here. That's what's alarming about these type of undercover videos that are captured.
We see an overly ambitious, excessive government doing everything it can to violate your rights.
Its greatest perceived obstacle is the Bill of Rights.
It seems like instead of trying to overcome crime or injustice, instead of trying to fight enemies of America or capture real criminals here domestically or protect the border for example, it seems that our intelligence community perceives your rights as a greater hindrance or pain in their agenda Than any of the real foes that they're actually supposed to be combating.
I want to show this clip.
This is clip number nine of Alex Jones responding to FBI targeting.
alex jones
Let's go ahead and run it. But now that this has come out, this is a FBI agent, a CIA boss—he's a contract manager over a large contract operation—that's a boss, that's like a mini-section chief—saying all of this and admitting all of this like it's no big deal.
He needs to be subpoenaed by Congress.
I am planning to launch a lawsuit.
We have to bring all this out.
And right as my bankruptcy comes to a close, and right as all this stuff's been finalized, it's really God working here that this came out of this context.
benny johnson
You just said you were planning on suing the federal government.
What would a Alex Jones versus the U.S. government look like?
alex jones
Well, I'm talking to different law firms right now that specialize in this.
In fact, when I get off the feed with you, I'm gonna get back on the phone with the lawyers.
It's obviously a civil rights violation.
It's a government racketeering operation using cutouts.
And look, I mean, they come out from my mother, my father, my wife.
In these mediations, they said, listen, just come out against the Second Amendment.
And we'll drop all this.
I mean, they've done that repeatedly.
And they've even said, listen, we're a mafia, and there's nothing you can do to stop us, to my face, in front of my lawyer, in front of Norm Patis.
And so they're very arrogant.
I mean, these are the sellouts. These are the traitors.
These are the people that really love being under the corrupt FBI's wings, under the CIA's wings.
They get a thrill. They get to go out and persecute fellow Americans, lie about them.
Say all these horrible things and then say you said it, steal your identity, silence you so they can all pile in on you, make movies about themselves with judges and flashbulbs and, oh, we're so great.
We went out and got the big Goliath.
No, no, you guys are the Goliath.
I'm the David. You misrepresented what I did to make me a monster, and it's backfired.
benny johnson
So when you say you're going to file a civil rights lawsuit against the government over this, this is something you've clearly talked about.
You've retained counsel on this.
Would you go on First Amendment grounds that they eliminated your right to free speech, the right to a free press?
And it seems like so much of what you do is, of course, crystallized in the First Amendment first for a reason.
alex jones
I've been talking to four different law firms, and I'm literally supposed to be on with one of them five minutes ago.
I will come back with you tomorrow.
I'll come back with you today. I love your show.
It's huge. But absolutely, I've got to get the wheels on this thing rolling.
And we've got a lot of options.
But again, it's not for me.
It's about to put it out in court and show the evidence and then drag them out in the line with discovery and show what they've really done.
And it's about congressional hearings, and it's about stopping these rogue agencies that have become domestic KGB operations.
And if Elon Musk wants to help me, I know he's been backing a lot of lawsuits out there for freedom.
I would love to see the truth came out, because when I told him in that two-and-a-half-hour interview we did three, four months ago, With Mario Defal, he said he wanted to hear, you know, the long story.
So I told him—I talked like 10 minutes to tell him the truth about what happened.
And the PR firms, he goes, oh, yes, the PR firms, which is the intelligence agency's mouthpieces, and how they did all that, how they created this, how it shows that it didn't exist, and then had to show a trial.
And then the very same law firm suing me or that sued me is the one suing Elon Musk.
So that's also a wake-up call for Elon.
chase geiser
So things are ramping up.
Now is more important than ever that you visit Infowarsstore.com and check out our amazing sales and deals.
But I want to encourage you specifically to do a couple of things as an audience as we are faced with this undercover video and this pending ramp up or escalation in the Infowar.
I want to encourage you to go to at realalexjones on x, x.com slash realalexjones or twitter.com slash realalexjones.
And there's two things you can do.
The first thing is there is the ability to give Alex tips at the top of his profile.
So you can click the little money icon at the top of his profile and just directly send money to Alex to help him with things like this.
The other thing is we were approved this week for subscriptions on Alex's profile.
So I would highly encourage you to support him on a regular basis.
You can pay $5 a month just to...
Throw money consistently in the Alex Jones was right tip jar.
And we're going to try to do things like ask me anything threads for just followers or exclusive posts of lost content that we have since uncovered for subscribers only on X. So if you are a fan of Alex Jones, if you've been listening to Alex Jones for an extended period of time, or if you're a new listener and you're just inspired by this awakening and what he's been saying, the truth he's been telling...
Then this is the right thing to do.
I understand that supplements aren't for everybody.
They weren't for me before I worked here.
It wasn't until I began working here and saw some of the supplements laying around that I began to understand the power of the products.
I was somebody who was skeptical about supplements, thinking that in most cases...
It was placebo effect and that they didn't really do anything.
But my mother-in-law is a nutritionist.
She advocates vehemently for supplements.
And after coming to work here and trying things like Turbo Force Plus or Brain Force Plus or Survival Shield X3, I began to feel the effects of our products in my own life.
I mean, if you take a Brain Force Plus and a scoop of Turbo Force in the morning, you're going to have a different day.
And it's not just the fact that it makes you sharper, more alert, and have more energy, or that these supplements are healthy for you in other ways, like Survival Shield X3 being an amazing way to help your body remove the toxins that it's exposed to in our food and our water.
It's what nascent iodine does, is it helps our body clean out toxins in a way that many of us are deficient.
But it keeps us on the air.
It's a 360 win, as Alex Jones says.
And given that we were in this last lap, this final leg of the race for humanity itself, coming up on November 5th, given that we've faced such severe lawfare, By going to infowarsstore.com and purchasing products, not only are you helping yourself, but you are keeping this broadcast on the air.
We do not broadcast our content so that we can sell supplements, folks.
We sell supplements so we can broadcast our content.
So please, I implore you, To try our products.
And if you're not ready to make the leap and try supplements or change your routine, then I understand.
But please consider going to x.com slash real Alex Jones, throwing some money in the tip jar or subscribing to his profile for $5 a month.
Hopefully we can get you some exclusive content and appreciation of it.
But it's a great way to fight the info war.
Now, I do want to show you one clip just for fun.
From the Benny Johnson interview that we just watched.
Obviously, that was a groundbreaking segment that we just showed you of Alex responding to this undercover video saying that he is speaking with lawyers and is going to make an effort to escalate and get this all out to the public via the court process and discovery.
But I want to show you my personal favorite moment of their conversation.
unidentified
Let's go ahead and run it. Elon clearly is all in.
alex jones
Either he's an opportunist and sees the global is collapsing and wants to be the new leader, or he is for team humanity and is just going to push them aside and then be the savior.
Regardless, he is currently annihilating our enemy.
He is currently devastating our operations.
So I go Elon Musk all the way.
I hope he'll join us on his face this Friday.
I'm going to do during my show. I hope you'll join us.
I'll do one Saturday as well.
We've got some stuff going on behind the scenes.
Looks like that's probably going to be happening very, very soon.
Might be on Mario and Defal's program or something.
But absolutely.
I mean, he's the man of the arena. You can't argue with his actions.
You can't argue with the fruit of the tree.
And now he's got the communists in Brazil coming after him because they wanted him to ban the opposition party leaders.
The State Department advised them a year ago and a half to ban Bolsonaro off the ballot.
So our own CIA isn't just overthrowing our government.
It's off overthrowing other governments right now.
And Elon Musk is spotting the EU censors.
He's fighting the communists in Brazil, the Lula dictatorship.
Elon Musk is like Godzilla, but he's not attacking Tokyo.
He's attacking the capitals of the tyrants, their lies.
And so I'm very, very excited about what's happening, and it's just great to be on the right side of history, and it's good to be in the fight, my friend.
benny johnson
So when you say you're going to file a civil rights lawsuit against the government over this, this is something you've clearly talked about.
You've retained counsel on this.
Would you go on First Amendment grounds that they eliminated your right to free speech, the right to a free press?
chase geiser
So Elon Musk is like Godzilla.
X has unleashed the reins of free speech upon the face of the planet, and we are taking on the New World Order.
I want to pivot a little bit.
We're going to get into some of these AI stories and some of the other breaking news as well.
But I did want to show this clip of Kennedy talking about the democratic funding of terrorists.
Let's play clip number six, and then we'll dive into it and unpack it.
unidentified
Gives to Iran is another dollar that will be used against our sons and daughters.
john kennedy
The Biden administration has operated as Iran's best friend, hasn't it?
john roberts
Live to our intrepid Hillary Vaughn, she's on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers have been pressing Treasury officials on the lifting of sanctions against Iran.
unidentified
Hillary? John, that's right.
Senate Republicans want to know why we're issuing any waivers at all for Iran when they are clearly using some of their assets to fund terrorism.
The White House lifting 10 billion dollars in sanctions through a waiver.
They say this money can only be used for the purchase of food and medicine and any suggestion that this waiver sends money directly to Iran that could be used to fund terrorism is false.
Secretary of State Antony Blinken signed the extension that allows Iraq to pay for Iranian electricity through an escrow account.
But Republicans aren't just skeptical that the Biden administration can actually guarantee that these billions don't end up paying for bad things.
They also aren't convinced that the additional $6 billion in frozen funds held by Qatar for Iran is not going to ultimately be handed over to them at some point.
john kennedy
If President Biden says Qatar Bank Don't give this money to Iran.
And the Qatar government says, give the money to Iran.
Who do you think the Qatar bank's going to listen to, Mr.
unidentified
Secretary? So, Senator, those banks in Qatar value greatly their ability to have a relationship with the United States because that's how they make money.
john kennedy
Do you believe in the tooth fairy?
unidentified
Ultimately, if we cut off those banks, they will no longer be able to make money.
And Democrats also drilled into the Deputy Secretary about Iran's vibrant crypto business that is allowing them to have a crypto cash flow to fund their terrorist activities.
Iran has a huge Bitcoin mining operation, which means that even Americans buying Bitcoin could inadvertently be helping Iran profit through paying Iran Bitcoin miners validation fees.
elizabeth warren
Iran could be our validator and would be collecting a fee, processing our crypto, all of that without either one of us knowing it?
unidentified
Senator, a transaction like that is certainly possible.
elizabeth warren
Okay, so Iran, which is subject to all kinds of sanctions, is moving money through crypto and actually making millions of dollars validating crypto transactions for Americans.
unidentified
And the deputy secretary today defended the administration's decision to waive sanctions while arguing at the same time that they need to crack down on crypto because, ultimately, that's what Iran is using as a workaround around the sanctions in place.
And they say, if we don't crack down on crypto, then the sanctions in place are effectively useless.
john roberts
John? Boy, if it leaves even Senator Elizabeth Warren baffled as to what the administration is doing, something's afoot.
Hillary Vaughn for us. Hillary, thank you.
Sandra? Okay, folks.
chase geiser
Obviously, we know that Iran is a major funder of terrorism in the region.
It's a major antagonist to Israel.
And our sanctions are part of the reason that that antagonism even exists.
The fact that the dollar is a global reserve currency is the reason that we're able to leverage our influence so heavy-handedly in the region.
And it's created a vast amount of bitterness for America among the Middle Eastern nations and others.
And we know that just printing money and sending it over there in any capacity, whether it's these wars in Iraq or Afghanistan or directly to Israel or an aid to Gaza, coupled with the sanctions that we impose upon people economically, is only serving to harm our currency and our status here in America.
And the crypto angle is the most interesting part of that clip to me because while cryptocurrency on the one hand is this great liberator, on the other hand, the blockchain technology behind it is being used to establish the central bank digital currencies that are meant to guarantee the Now we're going into the next new world order.
And the next one is going to be the total replacement of our monetary system on a global scale because this dollar is going to collapse.
And we see the establishment administrations claim time and time again that inflation is lower than it's been in 50 years, that inflation is a solved problem, that inflation isn't an issue.
I'm going to run clip three here in a second.
But Then simultaneously, we see reports from mainstream outlets, not just fringe outlets, not just people trying to sell gold, and so they're hyping up inflation.
I mean, this is the facts, folks.
The reality of the situation is consumer prices rose 3.5% from a year ago in March, and inflation comes in hotter than expected at 3.5%.
This is from the Wall Street Journal.
Surveys suggest that Americans remain frustrated by the cost of living, The Consumer Price Index, a measure of goods and services prices across the economy, rose 3.5% in March from a year earlier, the Labor Department said Wednesday.
That was a touch higher than economists had forecasted, and a pickup from February's 3.2%.
So inflation itself is on the rise.
Our dollar is collapsing, and they're lying about it.
Let's watch Kareem lie about it here in clip three.
Inflation's at 3.2%.
It's higher than it was in January.
unidentified
Are there any concerns that the disinflation we saw last year is starting to stall out?
karine jean-pierre
So look, I'm gonna say that this is a president that is doing everything that we can to fight inflation, right?
To build an economy from the bottom up middle out.
And we've been pretty consistent about that.
And what we have seen over the past several months is that inflation is down two-thirds and core inflation is at the lowest since May of 2021.
That matters. Wages are rising faster than prices over the last year.
Since the pandemic, we've seen 15 million jobs created because of the policies that this president has put forward.
Some really historic, bipartisan, even, legislation that's come into law to help create those millions of jobs.
Unemployment is at under 4%.
Is there more work to be done?
Absolutely. We're going to continue to do everything that we can to lower costs.
chase geiser
So while they lie about the problem, they simultaneously set the stage for the collapse.
This ties in directly to the cryptocurrency issue because, like they were saying about these sanctions on Iran, if we don't stifle the ability for Iran to use cryptocurrency, then no matter what sanctions we impose upon them, they're going to be able to get around through these crypto markets.
They can convert dollars or other currencies into crypto, send that crypto out of country, and then convert it back into whatever currency they want.
It's a money laundering tool.
It's anonymous, it's private, it's safe, it's secure.
Frankly, our voting should be based off of the same technology, blockchain technology.
But the reason they want to crack down on cryptocurrency is not because they are concerned with foreign entities like Iran or China or Russia evading our sanctions.
That is one reason.
The main reason they want to crack down on crypto is because they understand that after our currency collapses, there is going to be a lot of black market activity.
There are going to be a lot of people that are adopting and using cryptocurrency in order to try to do business together in some sort of a free way.
And their entire next world order system is based off of it only works if they have total control of all financial transactions.
So they have to make all crypto technology illegal.
They have to make these cryptocurrencies illegal in all these countries.
And you see it in China as well. The closer they get to instilling social credit scores.
The more aggressive their government becomes regarding surveillance and financial control, the more antagonistic it becomes to independent cryptocurrencies while the government itself simultaneously adopts all these blockchain technologies that are the basis of crypto.
So they're trying to eradicate, eliminate, control these loose ends, these wild hairs of crypto technology that could subvert the next world order's central bank digital currency.
The next world global reserve currency will be a digital cryptocurrency backed by blockchain.
And they want to make sure that there are no competitors in the space because if there's any semblance of freedom in the context of their total tyranny, there's always a risk to the power.
more news on the other side. - Welcome back to the American Journal folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host this morning.
Harrison Smith will be hosting the War Room this afternoon.
Noah and Troy are hosting the Alex Jones show in about an hour and a half.
We're going to start taking calls in about 30 minutes, so make sure you keep your phones close by.
I want to dive in a little bit on this, some of these new revelations around the Wuhan lab and the viruses and the WHO. First, 15 U.S. agencies knew Wuhan lab was trying to create a coronavirus like COVID-19, according to Rand Paul. While a massive body of evidence exists on the origins of COVID-19, Senator Rand Paul, a Republican from Kentucky, is conducting his own investigation into the matter.
In a Tuesday op-ed, Paul writes that government officials from 15 federal agencies knew in 2018 that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was trying to create a coronavirus like COVID-19.
It states, these officials knew that the Chinese lab was proposing to create COVID-19-like virus and not one of these officials revealed this scheme to the public.
Finally, he says, So, they So, they knew what they were doing, and They knew it was happening. Frankly, they funded gain-of-function research.
Even if they funded it indirectly, it's the same thing as funding it.
So if your kid comes to you and asks for $100 to buy heroin...
And you say no, and they say, okay, well, can I have $100 for groceries?
And you give them $100 for groceries, you're still funding the heroin because they'll take the $100 they already had and spend it on the heroin instead of the groceries and then take your $100 for the groceries.
It's the same thing. So if you're giving money to these institutions, even if it's not designated for gain-of-function research, you're culpable for the gain-of-function research that that institution is able to conduct.
So we knew, we kept it secret, which really...
Just evokes skepticism.
It makes one think, okay, well, did they release the virus on purpose?
Why were they doing this?
To what end?
What purpose were they creating this?
And it just happened that they were breaking the law, making something that they knew was illegal in the United States, funding it with our money.
It just so happened that they were committing that crime and that it backfired because it just spontaneously leaked from China.
It seems to me hyper-intentional.
I don't believe for a minute that our intelligence community didn't know that this was happening and spreading until January.
Most of the data that I've seen, most of the evidence that I've seen has suggested that the leak occurred, whether intentional or not, in the lab in September of 2019.
And we saw from the CCP's very own policies that they stopped domestic travel in China in and out of Wuhan, flights in and out of Wuhan domestically, while simultaneously allowing international travel in and out of Wuhan.
So they were happy to spread the virus all over the world.
As long as they can mitigate its spread domestically in China, there's no way that China would be able to enact a policy like that without getting the attention of our intelligence community.
Are you telling me that no one in the CIA at all understood that this virus was spreading for months before it was even admitted really to the United States public that This was happening?
It seems likely to me that the spread of this virus was very intentional for multiple reasons, primarily to subvert the final year of the Trump presidency, to change election proceedings and undermine Donald Trump because he is a threat to the next world order.
His advocacy for America first and populism and national sovereignty is antithetical to the agenda, the needs, goals, desires of the globalist community.
Because as long as America is sovereign, there can't really be a true globalism.
We are a necessary piece on the board of this tactic or strategy to completely replace the global monetary system.
Then we have molecular geneticists explaining how mRNA vaccines were designed to conquer the human mind.
I'm going to run clip 13 here in a second.
Now that everyone realizes that the COVID-19 vaccine doesn't actually prevent people from getting infected or passing the disease on to others, many people may be wondering why governments around the world were so insistent that people get jabbed.
Renowned molecular geneticist Dr.
Michael Nels has one theory.
He has studied the effects of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines on the brain extensively and believes it is the way these jabs affect our minds that made governments so eager to push them onto the population.
So he recently sat down with Tucker Carlson to discuss his book, The Indoctrinated Brain, and how these vaccines are affecting people's minds.
He explained how both the vaccines and the virus itself, which was engineered in a lab, funded by the Chinese government, and partly paid for by American government, just as we said, are vital components of a widespread assault on the human brain that seeks to squash the individuality associated with clear and healthy minds.
Not only that, but as we dive into this clip, 13, you'll see that other vaccines Symptoms and effects of these vaccines seem to be intentional as well.
michael yeadon
Let's go ahead and run it. When I looked at the mRNA vaccine, I looked at the Pfizer one, the Moderna one, I was horrified.
My contention is that there are multiple deliberate toxicities built into these materials, and I can justify that.
I ask your audience to think, how is it that their body plays nice with itself, doesn't attack itself unless you're unfortunate and have an autoimmune disease, but normally your immune system, they're like military personnel.
They stay in their barracks, they don't harm you.
But when you're infected or you get a cancer maybe, they go to war.
And you know the distinction, how it is that your body does that trick.
It distinguishes self, all the things inside your body that are meant to be there.
It doesn't attack. Anything foreign, anything non-self, it will attack.
So, when you take mRNA and get human body to make a piece of a foreign organism, ladies and gentlemen, That's not my dog.
When your body is instructed to make a piece of non-human protein, every cell that expresses that is now blaring a signal, I've been invaded.
Your immune system goes to war and tries to kill it.
Every single cell that this material goes into.
These could never, ever be safe for a mass market use.
If you just give it to mass populations, they will attack their own cells and kill them.
That is the reason why you see dozens of different side effects, because it's one mechanism of toxicity, but expressed anywhere in the body wherever it happens to land.
There are many more concerns, but that's my first top one.
unidentified
And you said this was intentional?
michael yeadon
Yes. All four companies, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson& Johnson, and Pfizer, all chose the same parts of this so-called COVID-19 virus.
They all chose the same parts.
They all chose the bit that sticks out to the outside called spike protein.
So a couple of things here.
If I was leading a drug discovery team and I did dozens of times, the chances that my peers in the other company will come up with the same solution is remote to tell the truth.
And you would never pick this.
Why would you not pick this?
We knew from previous work that the spike proteins that stick out from the outside of these microorganisms are biologically active.
They can trigger blood coagulation and they are neurally toxic.
They should have picked, if you believe the story about viruses, and I have significant concerns, but if we just go with the narrative, you would definitely, definitely not pick the part of the virus that is biologically active.
And the fact that all four drug companies did it, It's a Black Swan event.
unidentified
That's deliberate. Well, there you have it, folks.
chase geiser
Alex Jones was right again.
He's been saying it for years.
Now experts agree. We're going to come up on a break here.
I'm going to open up the phone lines in the next segment, give the crew the opportunity to screen some calls.
We'll take calls for the third hour.
In the meantime, make sure you visit Infowarsstore.com.
Check out Survival Shield X3. It's nascent iodine sourced from three different types of iodine to ensure our body's ability to metabolize and process all the benefits of iodine.
There's study after study showing how amazing this product is.
But not only is it amazing for you, your mind, your body, and its ability to remove toxins from the body, it's a great way to keep InfoWars on the air.
So be the reason we're still on the air at InfoWarsStore.com today.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geyser, your host this morning, filling in for the great Harrison Smith, who will be on the air from 3 to 6 p.m.
Central this afternoon into the evening on the war room at InfoWars.com forward slash show.
Owen Schwerer will be hosting the Alex Jones Show today.
The day after tomorrow, Alex will be back in studio, and I believe we're going to be doing broadcasts basically all weekend to make up for some lost time.
I want to open up the phone lines to give the crew the chance to screen some calls.
The sooner you call, the more likely I am to get to you.
877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
877-789-Alex.
While the calls pile in, I want to get into this.
CNN pesters black college students who are ditching Biden this election.
So during a recent CNN segment, this is clip 20, a group of four students attending HBCUs, historically black colleges and universities, explained why they don't want to vote for Joe Biden in the 2024 presidential election.
kate bolduan
Go ahead. Biden is going to need a strong showing from his 2020 coalition of voters if he wants to win again in November.
And right now, he's struggling with one key part of that coalition CNN is finding, younger black voters.
CNN's Renee Marsh sat down with students at HBCUs to dig deeper into why they're hesitating.
unidentified
This November will be the first time Lonnie White and Rokia Garbo will be old enough to vote in the presidential election.
And just the second time Malik Kuhl and Mohsin Shara will cast a presidential ballot.
None are planning to vote for Joe Biden or Donald Trump.
If I were to vote tomorrow, I wouldn't vote, period.
Ideally, I would like to vote third party.
I would vote for an independent candidate.
I'm considering either voting for Claudia de la Cruz or Cornel West at this point.
If there is no substantive policy change when it comes to the genocide in Gaza, then there's not really a discussion for me.
When we met at this barbecue restaurant in Atlanta, All four told me they were raised and originally registered as Democrats.
But this year, the president's handling of the Israel-Gaza war has turned them away.
I think what Biden has done in aiding and abetting genocide is just something I cannot stand for.
You're willing to withhold your vote in the presidential election unless there is a ceasefire.
Yes. And it's implemented.
Yes. Not voting could mean Donald Trump gets into office.
Do you think he'll be better on Gaza?
Trump would probably say flatten Gaza and make it into a golf course.
I have absolutely no faith in him.
Would you not say that also the people who are not voting for one of the two people who are the likely people to really be in this race have a role to play in kind of giving the race to Donald Trump in a state like Georgia where it's going to be like razor thin?
Yeah, no, I'll do you one better, actually.
I think that just means that's why the Democrats should listen.
Exactly. Radical and more tapped in than their peers is how the group describes themselves.
Rokia even helping to organize this demonstration in Atlanta last October, calling for peace and aid for the Palestinian people.
While they don't speak for the majority of black voters, their dissent poses a real concern for Democrats in battleground states like Georgia.
Where Biden won by fewer than 12,000 votes.
Black voters under age 30 made up only about 6% of voters in Georgia in 2020.
That group voted for Joe Biden by more than 50 points.
We are holding their election in the palm of our hands, and they're not listening.
We're tired of just hearing him say these things, these empty promises.
We have no trust in Joe Biden.
The Republican Party isn't earning their vote either.
Both sides are just equal.
Nothing is being done for us.
If enough people vote third party, we can win.
That's my thoughts. President Biden's campaign has touted his success on key issues affecting young voters, including student loan forgiveness, lowering unemployment, and tackling inflation.
Still though... I don't feel it.
People may be employed, but...
Can they survive off of it?
The federal minimum wage has stayed the same since 2009.
I was five in 2009.
I'm 20 years old now.
I work at Goodwill now for $12 an hour.
And cost of living keeps increasing, especially here.
What could President Biden do To change your mind as far as how you'll vote in November.
Call for permanent ceasefire and actually implement it.
I would like us to stop giving aid to Israel.
If he doesn't get elected, that is his fault.
That's not our fault.
That's not the black voters here.
That's not X, Y, and Z. No, it's on him.
Well, MAGA Inc., the super PAC supporting Trump has spent more than half a million dollars on ads on black radio, hoping to woo unhappy Biden voters.
Now, we asked the Biden campaign about the dissent that we're seeing among some young black voters, and they say their priority is direct messaging on the president's achievements to voters like we spoke to.
And this is certainly an area and a segment of their base, Kate, that they're concerned about.
chase geiser
Absolutely. They're losing the black vote for multiple reasons.
It's not just over Israel-Palestine disputes, but I think that the black community is finally realizing that the Democrats, as a party, haven't really ever accomplished anything for the black community.
It doesn't seem like since 1964 things are getting much better for the black community.
They were getting better certainly after the civil rights movement from 64 until we went off of the gold standard under the Nixon administration.
But what has the Democratic Party actually accomplished for black constituents?
Specifically. And we see this corruption within our current administration where they're trying to compensate for this.
They realize that they're losing not just the black vote, but the young vote.
The 18 to 30 crowd.
Which is bizarre because that's typically one of the most robust...
Voter bases of support for the Democratic Party.
And what are they doing to try to mitigate that?
Well, they're trying to just pay them off with your tax dollars by promising to forgive all of their student loans.
Let's go ahead and run clip number 18.
This is Kamala Harris announcing that your loans will be completely forgiven regardless of income.
kamala harris
Your loans will be completely forgiven regardless of your income and even if you did not graduate.
So I'm going to repeat that.
If you've paid undergraduate loans for more than 20 years or graduate loans for more than 25 years, those loans will be completely forgiven regardless of your income and even if you did not graduate.
And forgiveness will be automatic for the vast majority of the 25 million people that we believe will benefit from this approach.
chase geiser
And there's no such thing as canceling debt.
There's no such thing as debt forgiveness.
The debts are going to be paid, but just by the taxpayer.
And I think one of the greatest tragedies of leftism and just the democratic platform as a whole is that it promises a solution to the problems faced by our most vulnerable communities.
And the solution that is proposed is often only a solution that exacerbates the problem, makes it worse.
It exploits the issue for political power.
So if you look at the democratic policy for trans kids, for example, their solution to those suffering from gender dysphoria who they claim to advocate is mass sterilization.
We know how terrible these hormones and these drugs are for kids and adults alike.
know that an individual, according to studies that I've read, who has undergone gender transition is 19 times more likely to commit suicide after their transition than a member of the general population of the United States.
Studies have been going back years showing this.
So they're not trying to solve these problems.
They're not actually trying to help.
They're just claiming that they have a solution.
And then the solution that they instill makes the problem worse.
The worse the problem gets, the more support they have because they claim to be the advocate.
They've branded themselves as the advocate.
They come to you and they say, lucky strikes don't cause cancer.
Lucky strikes are toasted.
So on an emotional level, they win over their constituents, but on a practical level, they stab them in the back.
While Republicans, on the other hand, fail these vulnerable communities on winning the emotional argument because they don't consider the importance of the way they position themselves or the impression that they give, even though their solutions practically, their policies practically, would be much better for these communities.
And we saw the same thing with healthcare.
Obama administration comes out, says the Affordable Care Act is amazing, and then it implements policies that actually cause insurance companies to make more money when healthcare is more expensive, virtually guaranteeing that health insurance premiums will skyrocket every single year, and they have ever since the Affordable Care Act has passed.
And then they come and they say, okay, well, one of the ways to overcome systemic racism is to ensure that everybody has higher education, because if you have a higher education, then you're more likely to have a high-paying job.
So we're going to go ahead and come in and give all of these loans to the most vulnerable communities.
So that they can go to college.
But what that did was drastically increased the cost of higher education.
There was a time 50 years ago where you could work a part-time job and basically pay your way into a bachelor's degree without taking out any loans.
Now it's impossible to get a bachelor's degree without spending at least $100,000 in many cases.
And so we've saddled these communities with that.
Every single solution that the Democrats have proposed for black communities or other vulnerable communities or the poor among us has exacerbated those problems, and they want those problems to get worse because those problems are the reason they get elected in the first place.
the first place we have to stop believing the lies, folks.
Welcome back to the American I am Chase Geiser, your host this morning.
Harrison Smith will be hosting the War Room this afternoon.
We have one hour left of the program before Owen Schroyer hosts the Alex Jones Show today.
And we are going to be taking calls.
Make sure you call 877-789-2539.
I see the board is lighting up here.
I see everybody's name. We will be going down the line in a moment.
But after covering some of the revelations about the vaccine, more data, more experts, more examples of how screwed up this was, not to mention the fact that the virus was A, manufactured, and B, spread intentionally, whether it leaked intentionally or not.
It always brings to mind Bill Gates.
And one of the themes of today's show, specifically, as is often the theme on Infowars, is the threat of globalism.
And I just want to give the audience a sense of how bizarre and creepy these people are.
So Bill Gates has been a major advocate for mass vaccinations.
He's obviously a very questionable villain in the Info War series.
And just take a look for this one-minute clip, 16 here.
Bill Gates was secretly recording his testimony during a Microsoft Monopoly charge.
How bizarre is this?
I've never seen anything so sociopathic.
unidentified
Go ahead. During the 18-month trial, Gates gave hours of videotaped testimony.
What were the non-Microsoft browsers that you were concerned about in January of 1996?
That month. Yes, sir.
And what about it? What non-Microsoft browsers were you concerned about in January of 1996?
I don't know what you mean, concerned.
What is it about the word "concern" that you don't understand?
I'm not sure what you mean by it.
The Justice Department has charged Microsoft with engaging in anti-competitive and exclusionary practices designed to maintain its monopoly in personal computer operating systems.
chase geiser
Now, it's only natural that businesses, people, individuals seek as much success and control as possible.
We're terrified of failure.
We're ambitious. And we're terrified of losing control because if we're out of control, then we don't have any freedom.
Ironically, I think some of the most famous dictators throughout history actually valued freedom the most.
They just didn't value it for their people.
They valued it for themselves.
And in order to have the maximum level of freedom for themselves, they had to exact the maximum amount of tyranny on their people to ensure that control.
Microsoft would do what needs to be done in order to control the market.
That's not at all the issue that I take with that video.
It's just how creepy and bizarre and calculated and cold.
I mean, you know the famous scene from...
What's the movie with Anthony Hopkins, Jodie Foster?
Silence of the Lambs? You know Anthony Hopkins embodied...
Through a form of method acting, he picked an animal to embody, and he based his entire character, mannerisms, and disposition off of a snake for that movie, so he hardly ever blinks.
And for that famous scene when Jodie Foster first sees him, and he's just standing there, not moving at all, and just following her with his eyes as she walks up to the cell, that is a snake.
That is the vibe that I got from Bill Gates in that disposition that we just watched.
He's sitting there like a calculating cold-blooded snake.
And this is the person that we're supposed to trust is compassionate about humanity.
This is the person that isn't suffering from any form of mental illness that is pushing these vaccines on the entire world after trying to corner...
The tech market and then response like this.
I think that was a moment of clarity.
A moment of revelation.
It was an epiphany for me when I saw that.
Just how maniacal this class of people has become.
We're going to be taking calls right on the other side.
I have one minute break right now.
Visit InfoWarsStore.com and be the reason we are still on the air.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host, and we are going to be taking calls and breaking balls this hour. - Yeah.
The list of names on the board is lit up, and I'm going to go down the line to make sure you hang on for the high-speed chase.
Joe in Texas, what's on your mind, Joe?
unidentified
Good morning. I hope you're enjoying the free air conditioning.
chase geiser
I sure am. Okay.
unidentified
So, last night, I'm watching the live vision, and...
A commercial comes on, and Pfizer is advertising that it's going to give one of its COVID-19 drugs out for free, and that's the Paxlovid.
So there was a story, it reminded me of a story I had read, so I went back, I've been saving things on the phone, and so I went back, and so Pfizer found out sometime in the last couple of years the Paxlovid doesn't work.
Is that the therapeutic?
Yes. Okay. But it's for COVID-19.
chase geiser
Yes. Okay.
unidentified
So they delayed publishing their study until this week.
So they knew years ago that it didn't work.
It wasn't effective. So until this past week, after Biden's administration stopped subsidizing Pfizer for Plexovid, after $12.6 billion with a B, taxpayer dollars were spent.
So they run through it, they get the subsidy for $12.6 billion, and then they say, oh, hey, we just dug up this study and it doesn't work, so hey, we wanted you to release it, and now it's free, guys.
Enjoy! Something that doesn't work.
Unbelievable. So now the doctors are going to be jabbing people with plaques of what they know doesn't work.
chase geiser
Unbelievable. Joe, thanks for mentioning that and bringing that to my attention.
I appreciate it. Josh in Canada.
Josh, what's on your mind? Going...
unidentified
My phone's good? You sound good.
Okay, perfect. First off, I'm a long-time listener, first-time caller.
My son actually has hemophilia A-severe, so I can relate.
chase geiser
Me too, man. I'm sorry to hear that, but is he doing okay?
unidentified
Yeah, he's doing all right.
He's 11, but young boys are.
chase geiser
Yeah, they have him on Hemlibra or Abbate.
Hemlibra, yeah. That's good stuff.
unidentified
That's been awesome. Now it's once every two weeks he's got his injection and what a difference.
chase geiser
That's amazing. Yeah, awesome.
unidentified
The second thing I wanted to mention was all the products.
I'm just drinking my Turbo Force and it's awesome.
I've gotten lots of products from you guys and they've been great.
chase geiser
Thank you for your support.
unidentified
I appreciate that. And the next thing was the Bank Act in Canada.
They added a sunset provision, section 21.1, if you, I don't know if any Canadians want to look it up, and CANLI, C-A-N-L-I-I, is a good browser to view our laws.
Subject to subsection 2 and 4, banks shall not carry on business, and authorized foreign banks shall not carry on business in Canada after June 30, 2025.
chase geiser
Really? I had no idea.
So no foreign bank can do business in Canada after next summer?
unidentified
Yep. They stuck that in, so unless anything happens, it's already set, ready to go.
The trap's already set.
chase geiser
Wow. So do you know how many foreign banks are operating in Canada now?
unidentified
I am not totally sure.
I know there's lots of crypto ones that are in and out of Canada, and since they came in, they've Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
But there is an extension, the 21-2, the governor and council, by order, extend up to six months the time during which banks may continue to carry on business and authorized foreign banks may continue carrying on business in Canada. extend up to six months the time during which banks No more than one order may be made under this subsection.
Wow.
chase geiser
Wow.
Very interesting, bizarre stuff that's being sneaked into these bits of legislation around.
It reminds me of what we've been hearing, reports regarding new policies from the WHO and the international healthcare community about how we would respond to a disease X. It seems like they're planning for some major disruption, and it's easy to get these rules, laws, and policies passed now before the crisis.
Because nobody's aware that there's a crisis coming, and they're setting the stage, man.
Josh, thanks for your call. I appreciate it.
Good luck with your son. I'm glad that everybody's happy and healthy.
One more thing? Yeah, go ahead.
unidentified
Yeah, and I think the reason why he put it on that date, the end of June, because that's when Parliament goes on summer holidays, so he'll have July, August, and half of September to do whatever he does before there's anybody back in Parliament.
chase geiser
Crazy, Josh. Thank you.
Jefferson in Virginia. Jefferson, what's on your mind this morning?
jefferson in virginia
Hey, good morning, Chase. How's it going?
Good. Thanks for calling again. Yeah, I was listening to Harrison yesterday, and he said, we are now part of the insurrection.
We've lost control of the country to the leftists, and we have to figure out that we are now the enemy, and we have to figure out how to take back the reins of control probably before we invest in the election.
How do they get you to invest in the election, the rigged election that's coming up in 219 days or whatever?
They make you believe there's a chance you could win.
And then they steal it from you.
And because they're still in power and because they control the Department of Justice, they then can go after you when you question the results of the election that was clearly stolen in November to keep Biden in power, whoever the nominee is.
So that's the situation we find ourselves in.
We're heading closer and closer to basically an ambush because we're going to invest in the election and talk about polls for the next seven months that don't really matter.
that we're gonna win And whatever they have to do to cheat and win, they'll do.
And we'll look around and go, oh, God, they did it again.
But we're in a worse situation now because they're fully in charge of the Department of Justice and will come after us every time we say, but you stole it again.
chase geiser
So are you not going to vote?
unidentified
No. Well, I mean, I would hope nobody would vote.
jefferson in virginia
I would hope we would call off the election and end up in continuity of government before we ever get to that situation.
chase geiser
What if you're wrong and everybody mistakenly doesn't vote and we just lose?
Like, that's such a risky approach, you know?
jefferson in virginia
No, I'm not saying that Republicans shouldn't vote.
I'm saying we shouldn't let anybody vote.
There should be no election.
We should abolish the government we currently have.
That's what our Declaration of Independence says we can do, is that when we don't believe in our government anymore, we simply say, we don't think you're a legitimate government anymore.
We're not going to listen to what you say.
We're going to create a new government.
And if we have to go through continuity of government to get there, that's fine with me.
But the idea that we're going to invest in an election that we're going to have stolen from us again and look around after the election and go, damn, now what do we do?
We're falling into an ambush trap again.
It's a situation we should have tried to avoid.
And, you know, as I say, come May 28th, Biden's going to put us under UN control with this pandemic treaty.
Then we're going to find ourselves in a situation where we're really in a kettle of boiling water and we're the frogs.
chase geiser
Yeah, I'm with you.
And I'm concerned about it too.
The issue is, when I look at history, and I'd be interested to hear what you think about this, Jefferson, people don't seem to stand up to their government until things get really painful.
One of the things I think was fairly unique about the revolution here in the United States is that Things weren't actually that painful for most people here when we decided to declare independence and have a revolution.
But historically, people tolerate a massive level of abuse from their government before they revolt.
And I just don't think the pain is there among the people yet to catalyze the level of consensus and resistance that would be needed in order to prevent something like an election this fall.
jefferson in virginia
Yes, but back then, during the original revolution, we were all relatively independent.
unidentified
You know, we could grow our own food, we could hunt for our own food, we could survive.
jefferson in virginia
But now we're all so dependent on the system that they've got us cowed into a situation where we're afraid to revolt because the situation is shitty enough as it is, pardon my French.
chase geiser
Yeah, absolutely, Jefferson.
Scary stuff. Thank you for your call.
Jack in Wisconsin. Jack, what's on your mind?
icarus in wisconsin
Hey, good morning.
Yeah, y'all were talking about, like, the cancer and corona, COVID-19 correlation, and people forget the insanity that was occurring where they had us all, like, over-sanitizing and washing our hands and washing our groceries with Lysol, and I think that's a big indicator of not only how toxic the cleaning products are currently, but, like, why cancer has shot up.
It's not just the I think a good thing to do,
because you always want to think proactive, you know, what can I do today is to switch to, like, the old-school style of cleaning, hot water, bleach where needed, washing after bleach, washing the walls.
matt in wisconsin
Botanical cleaners based on time and other essential oils.
Just so you know, in this environment where we're all being poisoned every day by our food and water and atmosphere and building products and so on and so forth, you have to prevent those cancer causing factors from bioaccumulating.
icarus in wisconsin
Also having a proper amount of sleep.
They say if you have under seven hours of sleep, Or under eight hours of sleep that you lose about 70% of your cancer-fighting cell ability for just the next day.
matt in wisconsin
It happens instantly. So I think that's an important thing that people don't bring up, really, along with, like, HVAC, the air quality in people's houses.
icarus in wisconsin
People need to take care of their air quality, especially how they're hyping this bird flu.
matt in wisconsin
HEPA filters in the air ducts with a good seal around UV cleaners and most importantly I recommend what they use on the space station which is an ionic sanitizer on the space station they need to be able to clean and sanitize things without spraying liquids on it and this is like an emitter that emits ions that not only cleans non-porous and porous surfaces but also goes inside your lungs and cleans your lungs where before ozone could only be used in increments
chase geiser
Well, Jack, I appreciate your call and you mentioned all those things.
I want to ask the crew real quick, do we still have the air filters in stock at Infowarsstore.com?
Because as you mentioned all this stuff, I'm sure all the products and things that you're mentioning are great too, but there's several things at Infowarsstore.com that directly correlate to some of the things that you were talking about, whether it's DNA Force Plus, Or the Survival Shield X3, which is back in stock at 40% off because nascent iodine is necessary for our bodies to remove the toxins from the food and the water that we consume.
And I know that we've got the Alexa Pure water filters, which are great as well.
Plus, we did for a time at least sell the air filters.
I'm not sure if we still do, but everything you're saying is absolutely correct.
We are being attacked on all fronts, our mind and our body from several different angles, whether it's Big Pharma or the New World Order itself.
And going to InfoWarsStored.com is not only a way that you can directly fight back against the toxins and assaults on your health and your mind, but it's also a way that you can keep this broadcast on the air to help us ensure that the next world order is not able to manifest itself because as soon as we make everyone aware or enough people,
a substantial enough critical mass of people aware of what's going on, then it's going to be impossible to For the New World Order.
Let's go ahead and go to the next caller.
Go ahead and just pick who's next and let's take it from there.
I can't see the screen on the board.
unidentified
Sean, let's go ahead. How are you doing, Chase?
Can you hear me? Yes. Awesome sauce.
sean in california
Hey, I'm going to have to rebut the caller about two callers ago as far as his continuity of government ideas and stuff.
Okay. So I'm going to give you the recently published Riverside County, California, primary vote numbers regarding the Senate seat that Steve Garvey and Adam Schiff are running for.
We're only an hour east of L.A., so consider us a conservative bellwether here in California.
If you get rid of Silicon Valley, San Francisco, and L.A., and all the other conservative counties vote like this, We have Steve Garvey, 173,876 votes.
Piddly, 102,290 votes for Adam Schiff.
44% versus 26%, I'm rounding it down.
Even Katie Porter and Eric Early combined can't make a bad difference.
So that means our state looking to swing heavily For the Republican nominees.
And then if you want, I'll even give you the Trump and Biden numbers, which are really encouraging for our county out here.
Because we have a large African American demographic and Latino demographic, about 45%.
chase geiser
But you're talking about your county specifically, though, not that it would reflect at the state level.
So that's my concern about the Trump election.
Obviously, there's going to be a lot of counties inland in California that are going to vote for Donald Trump.
But these major Democratic cities, the state's never going to swing back, do you think?
sean in california
Well, all the conservative counties are going to have to unite and not dawdle on this and actually, you know, get it done right.
unidentified
The thing for securing the election...
sean in california
There's a little bit of a nexus, and I'll just break it down to common parlance for people.
Petition your sheriff to have deputies at the election site.
That'll at least kill the options of the mules because they'll have to get past the deputies.
A sheriff can arrest and confiscate anything used in a crime, including fraudulent ballots or a machine.
That's something our sheriff in Riverside County has been very helpful as far as us looking at the election fraud.
We got rid of our registrar voters, as I mentioned, last fall.
And we have a mechanism right there.
Engage your sheriff. If your sheriff is a no-go, then that's where his oath of office comes into play, which was covered by Greg Reese's report yesterday and also today.
Those oaths of office, when you pull them, That's their contract.
If they breach their contract, they can be removed.
If they don't have the oath, they're committing fraud, and they can also be prosecuted for that.
So the people have to actually do the policing and the oddity.
I can give you guys more information.
Go to national-assembly.net Thursday night.
We always have a conference call.
That's free to attend.
Everything we do is free. And there's all these mechanisms in place.
It's not that we've got to have continuity of government and destroy the government.
We've got to restore the republic and become self-governing, which means take some time out of your day, learn the material, learn the mechanics, and then pass that knowledge along and actually act on it lawfully.
We don't have to burn down the city.
That's what the Democrats do.
chase geiser
Right. Thank you, Sean.
I appreciate that.
And I wish you the best in California.
I pray for you out there.
And thank you for fighting the good fight and not giving up.
Brian in Ohio. Brian, what's on your mind?
unidentified
Well, first of all, it's a pleasure to speak with you.
Likewise. Chase Geiser, Harrison Smith, you guys are amazing American men.
I'm grateful to speak with you.
Thank you. And I... Of course.
And I've noticed around me and around a lot of InfoWars viewers like myself that there's a lot of anxiety that's built up around a lot of these ideas.
And I'll tell you, when I see the world, the world is always corrupt.
And it's always going to be corrupt.
And the goal for the individual, I believe, is to sustain a culture that's worth saving.
And InfoWars is...
The projection of the American spirit into the world and we should therefore use our dollars to support the InfoWars network and buy the things that are good for us on the micro and great for us on the macro so that we may sustain the culture that is worth saving.
chase geiser
Brian, you're absolutely right.
No, I'm glad that you had the opportunity to call in and say that.
I appreciate it. I'm going to let you go, though, because there was a lot of background noise, but we were able to clearly hear everything that you said, and I think you made an outstanding point.
I appreciate your support and kind words.
Let's go to Jen in Georgia.
Jen, what's on your mind? Hey, Chase.
jen in georgia
Well, I just wanted to talk about predictive programming and how it relates to the COVID virus.
But have you ever seen the movie Contagion, the 2011 film with Matt Damon and Kate Winslet?
chase geiser
I haven't seen it, but I'm familiar with it.
jen in georgia
Yeah, well, it's very strange how at the end of the movie, you know, they show that the virus itself came from a bat.
And it's kind of weird how, you know, that's what they tried getting us to believe for the longest time about COVID-19.
And, uh, I mean, it just, not just that movie, but like all the other movies, you know, you got World War Z, which I think in a way can be a little bit sci-fi whenever they talk about like zombies, but in a way, I mean, 28 days later, massive pandemic, same thing.
chase geiser
Yeah. All this predictive programming is definitely instilled in our culture.
jen in georgia
I don't know anything about...
I guess I'm behind on the times.
I haven't really been in touch with everything going on in the world that long.
What was the NIPA? How the heck do you say that?
It's N-I-P-A-H. It says that the contagion movie was inspired by that virus, but I don't even know anything about that virus.
All I know is that it really correlates a lot with how they made people believe COVID came from a bat.
chase geiser
Yes.
And it's funny, they always pick an animal that is something we're inherently afraid of, right?
It's not like, oh, this one came from the bunnies ever, right?
The cute little animal.
This one didn't come from the puppies or the kittens or the bunnies or the squirrels or any of these animals that we perceive to be sweet and harmless.
It's always like a bat, like a blood sucking, going to infect you with rabies associated with vampires, deadly, only comes out at night, insidious animal.
I just think that at this point, it seems like they're just picking anything scary to ascribe these things to to just reinforce that psychological emphasis upon us so that we react in fear.
And the crazy thing to me about it is that not only that it works, but that it works to such an extent that you see people with the face shields and the mask or they're double masked.
And you see all of the just cognitive dissonance around the response to these fears.
It's such an effective approach to psychological manipulation on a massive scale that I don't know whether to be...
Angry or impressed.
And I don't know whether to be just in awe of the power and ability of the establishment to convince people of terrible things that aren't true or ashamed of the people for believing it to begin with.
Great call, Jen. I appreciate that.
We have time for at least one more call.
Let's go to Dennis in Florida. Dennis, what's on your mind?
unidentified
Yeah, hi, Chase. I'm calling again.
I spoke to Owen. I spoke to Harrison.
And now I'm getting to speak to you.
The only way we're going to be able to win this is to defeat the globalists.
And to do that, we have to unite the world with a vision that they can wrap their heads around.
A vision of ten Americas of their own that's based on the original pre-1913 pre-progressive era US Constitution with originalist updates.
And the way we attain that is we first unite the world to defeat the globalists and their apparatus that's going to prevent our next election.
Then we have the free election and afterwards a convention of states.
And with the Convention of States, we formed New America from Panama to Alaska, including Japan and the Caribbean.
And that serves as the template for the remaining nine.
The world needs to be free.
It's being made into a prison planet right now.
They have planned 10 states for the prison planet.
Ours has 11. 10 Americans and an elite state in Antarctica so they can get the hell off our backs and they can have that land down there and move their operations down there and totally remove their tentacles from us.
That is the only way to do this.
We've got to defeat the globalists now by uniting the world with the vision of freedom that they're waiting for.
And Alex must broadcast these plans for global debate.
That is releasing the antimatter on the elite.
That's our only hope.
chase geiser
Yeah, well, I think Alex Jones and Justin Trudeau should have a debate.
You know, Alex has talked about Justin quite a bit.
Now Justin's talking about Alex.
Maybe they should talk to each other about some of these ideas.
Thank you so much for your call. You're absolutely right in the fact that globalism is the enemy.
It's the ultimate enemy, and it has many faces, and it fights on many fronts in many different ways, on many different mediums.
So yes, absolutely.
I don't know what the specific solution is.
I just know that the first step to solving the problem is admitting that we have a problem.
So I'm focused on the awareness front and hopefully great minds like yours and others.
After the critical mass of awareness is reached, we'll be able to come together and outline both strategy and tactical approach to solving this problem.
But right now, the focus is on awareness.
We have to have a massive enlightenment of people worldwide so that they can finally hold their politicians accountable wherever elections still actually take place legitimately.
So that maybe we can have some sort of a healthy reversal without massive violence.
Maybe we can prevent World War III and establish freedom for the century to come.
Stay with us for more calls on the other side.
Welcome back to the American Journal.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am Chase Kaiser.
For the next 30 minutes, we are going to be taking calls.
First, though, I want to dive into this article because I see a call on the board that wants to talk about this issue.
18-year-old Idaho man arrested just before allegedly carrying out ISIS terror attack on churches.
The DOJ arrested an 18-year-old Idaho man over the weekend after he reportedly pledged allegiance to ISIS and planned to attack churches.
In Idaho, I suppose.
According to police, Alexander Scott Mercurio was going to knock out his father, handcuff him, and take his firearms to go kill people at nearby churches.
Daryl in North Carolina.
Daryl, what do you think about this story?
daryl in north carolina
Hey Chase, thanks.
Yeah, what a strange story.
Well, my take is this.
We've been giving the FBI a hard time lately.
They've been rounding up all the J6 senior citizens and taking those annoying Christian prayer people, teaching them the law.
unidentified
But that doesn't mean that the FBI isn't still keeping us safe.
daryl in north carolina
And this Alex Mercurio case is case in point.
I mean, here we have this...
It says here he was in contact With FBI informants for, I think, two years.
So he says, this is a quote from Alex, that when COVID-19 shut down his high school, he was real lonely, and that's when he started, he was reached out by the Islamists.
So he was planning on attacking these 21 churches using a metal pipe, butane fuel, a machete, and like you mentioned, if he could get the keys to his father's locked gun safe, He was maybe going to use one of those guns, too. I'm wondering if the FBI will put him in a cell with the other 19-year-old Indian man that was a white supremacist Nazi who ran his U-Haul into the White House last year.
So I'm just glad that the FBI is on these 18 and 19-year-old mastermind ISIS terrorist guys.
chase geiser
What do you think? Well, I agree that...
Alex has said this countless times over the years.
Most of the people in government are good people.
It's the top level, the top tier that's evil and corrupted.
The highest levels of these organizations.
The James Comeys and others, the directors of the CIA year after year, have been the ones that orchestrate this utilitarian, Machiavellian approach to control and abuse of rights.
But your average FBI agent...
For the most part is a Boy Scout.
This is somebody that joins because for some reason they feel like it would be an honor to catch bad guys.
They have a sense. They have the protector's sense where they want to guard and protect the innocent.
There are men that are born with that inherently.
Everybody's got it. Every man has it to a certain extent.
But many of those who really have it make the decision to join the CIA or the FBI for good reasons.
I mean, even Edward Snowden himself got involved in the intelligence community because he loved his country.
So absolutely, it's a great thing when terrorists are caught.
And I understand that there could be details to this particular case that we don't know.
So is it possible that over the course of the two years they were investigating this particular kid, Were they egging him on?
Like with a Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case type thing?
But I'm not one to say that just because the FBI touched it makes it evil.
And I'm sure that there are countless examples of pedophiles, murderers, rapists, terrorists that are caught by our intelligence community.
I just am not sure.
Frankly, I'll just explicitly state it.
I don't believe that the good our intelligence communities do now...
It outperforms the harm that they cause at scale to the limit because of the policies and violations of rights over the years in different ways.
Now, obviously, there needs to be some form of law enforcement capable of doing things like this.
I just don't know that institutions like the CIA or the FBI, since they have virtually no accountability to any third party, I don't know that these institutions are salvageable as they are.
It seems like we need to abolish and build back up from the bottom.
unidentified
What do you think, Daryl? Couldn't agree more.
daryl in north carolina
I mean, you know, going back to J. Edgar Hoover, these guys are accountable to nobody.
I mean, you've got groups of FBI, CIA, who knows, running around with their own personal pet projects, accountable to nobody.
And they've got Congress totally cowed.
Congress is terrified to do anything against these guys.
So, to me, these intelligence agencies that have their own agendas, which are completely separate from the average American's best interests, They not only need to be reined in, but like you said, they probably do need to be abolished or at least have someone go in there that's serious, that can really just get rid of all the bad guys and let the good guys take over.
And if there are good FBI and CIA agents doing good things, let's hear about it.
Because all we've heard about the last couple of years are all the attacks on Americans and these 18-year-old poor kids that Yeah, absolutely.
chase geiser
Well, and things like government-enforced lockdowns, coupled with therapists that insist on SSRIs, create 18-year-old kids like this.
I listened to a tragic, tragic 911 recording with a first responder, and I can't remember the specific details of the case, but it was like a 13-year-old boy who stabbed to death His three-year-old sister in her bed and then called 911 on himself, sobbing, saying, I don't know what happened.
I didn't mean to do it.
I stabbed my sister.
Please come. She's dead.
And this kid, like, obviously was terrified, sad, shaken.
I don't have pity for evil and murder.
It was so tragic because you could tell a kid was just so screwed up.
I don't know if it was a natural mental illness or if it was SSRIs or the details of that specific case, but I'm telling you, the stuff that we pump into our kids coupled with the situations we put them in, coupled, again, with the information that we funnel into them, is screwing them up.
I mean, let's just run this clip, for example.
This is clip number 17.
Obviously, this kid isn't a murderer.
I'm not trying to associate him with that, but just look how screwed up this generation is in this short clip.
unidentified
Oh, U.S. Government of America, you've made a big mistake.
You think you can take away our app?
Well, we are the most powerful generation that there ever was.
We are Generation Z. We won't let TikTok fall.
We will rise!
Rise above it all!
We will save TikTok.
Time's running out.
Can you hear the clock?
Joe Biden, we are ready for war.
You want us so bad, and now you want more.
Who's with me? Charlie D'Amelio!
chase geiser
Noah Beck!
unidentified
JoJo Siwa!
Brittany Borowski!
Welcome to the end time.
chase geiser
I don't want to have to negotiate with that kid if I want a PS5. So, that's just my thinking there.
Let's move on. Matt in West Virginia, we've got one minute left.
What is on your mind? Can you give me one minute, Chase?
Okay. You want more time? One minute.
If you want more time, I'll do a plug and I'll take your call at the beginning of the next segment.
You want it? I'll do it. Now you only got 54 seconds.
unidentified
I can do it. Okay, here we go.
I'm a nuclear biological chemical specialist in the United States Army and in the United States Marine Corps.
I have studied this extensively, and God knows, our Father in Heaven knows, that we are easily defeated.
Yes. So he puts the answers in simple things.
So one of the best products that you have is nitric freeze because it is a vasodilator, which allows blood to flow more freely.
So that's number one.
Number two, the way to defeat biological contaminants in the human body is to go alkaline.
If you make your blood alkaline, and you should do your own research.
I'm not the tyrannical government.
Don't do this.
Do your own research.
chase geiser
These toxins, these viruses, illnesses can't live when you're in that level.
unidentified
They cannot, exactly.
They cannot survive in an alkaline environment.
Free radicals cannot survive.
Welcome back to the American Journal folks.
chase geiser
I'm Chase Geiser. A thief who stole a diary belonging to Joe Biden's daughter, Ashley, is jailed.
Apparently, a Florida woman who stole the journal of President Joe Biden's daughter and sold it to a conservative advocacy group.
Project Veritas will face jail time and home detention, a U.S. District Court judge ruled yesterday.
Harris stole Ashley Biden's journal, among other possessions, from a friend's home in Florida in 2020.
President's daughter had kept them in the home for safekeeping.
Harris later received $20,000 from Project Veritas in exchange for the journal.
She now faces one month behind bars and another three months of home detention, followed by several years of probation, as I understand it.
And it just seems like a miscarriage of justice to me that this woman should be behind bars for stealing a diary and giving it to the press while the crimes documented in that diary go uninvestigated, uncharged. I mean, is anybody going to ask Joe Biden any questions about showers with his underage daughter?
Has she made any statements to law enforcement about it?
Is there going to be any investigation?
And I don't want to be nitpicky or hyperbolic about it or beat a dead horse.
You guys know about this diary.
It's her version of the laptop.
They seem to leave all of their sins behind for the world to see.
It's almost like fate is actively working against the Biden administration to scream as loud as it can to the masses, anyone who will listen, that they're evil.
Yet, nobody's responding at all.
I mean, why is it that the left believes Eugene Carroll, but they don't believe Ashley Biden?
Why is it that the left believes in Russian collusion but they don't believe in all the evidence documented on the laptop?
Why is it that the left believes Donald Trump wants to be dictator and imprison political opponents but they don't believe that the Biden regime and the Department of Justice are acting in a tyrannical way and imprisoning political opponents?
Why is it that the left believes that Ukraine is a democracy And that the best way to fight for democracy is to remove political opponents from ballots.
I don't understand the extent of this cognitive dissonance other than just a massive lack of courage and character among these people who would rather see the world burn around them than face the discomfort of knowing that they've been wrong about everything forever.
Take some calls.
Mike in Tennessee. Mike, what's on your mind?
mike-2 in tennessee
Hey, Chase. Yeah, I'm just curious if you saw the debate recently between Stu Peters and Adam and some evangelical Zionists.
chase geiser
I know Stu Peters and Adam King had a debate, but I haven't watched it yet.
I just saw some posts about it in passing, but what do you have in mind about it?
mike-2 in tennessee
Well, I'm kind of thinking that Infowars needs to have more debates like that because, you know, Harrison does a great job.
So do you. Yeah, that's not a bad idea. I believe...
chase geiser
That we may be having a flat earth debate fairly soon.
I don't want to share any details because I don't think anything's confirmed yet.
But we are making an intentional effort to have more debate type content in the future, especially on this show, as I understand it.
I'm not sure about the War Room or the Jones Show.
Alex has always been good about doing debates whenever anybody wants to.
So we've done a little bit of that this year, but I think you're right.
I think it's important that we have intense, passionate conversations that are as informed as possible on controversial issues rather than just, you know, reinforcing the information, preaching to the choir, right?
So thank you so much for that call.
I appreciate that. Let's go on to Shane in Colorado.
Shane, what's on your mind? Hey Chase, how are you doing?
sean in california
I'm good, thank you. I wanted to bring up, there's this great documentary, it's called The Fall of Minneapolis.
Okay. And it lays out how the sheriff and the DA and the mayor, they all worked together, and then how the FBI got involved there in Minneapolis and orchestrated the riot.
And, you know, to most info-warriors, There's nothing too new about the information, but they really lay it out all together in a nice timeline.
chase geiser
And it's called The Fall of Minneapolis.
sean in california
Yes, and it's on YouTube.
chase geiser
Okay. Thank you, Shane.
sean in california
And I just wanted to take it one step further.
There was a caller yesterday who talked about how he thought these guys in New York who were punching ladies in the head were getting paid to do it.
I would like to put out there that I think the people that traveled from out of state to go riot and to burn and to loot in Minneapolis were also paid.
chase geiser
I mean, there's footage of busloads of them.
There's footage of busloads of them.
We know that the left and the establishment, the intelligence community, has to pay crisis actors and protesters to show up to these events.
sean in california
And then bailed out by Kamala Harris.
unidentified
Yes, yes. And the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
chase geiser
Absolutely. Shane, you nailed it, man.
That's the fact of the matter. I will check out the fall of Minneapolis.
That sounds fascinating. Thanks for mentioning it.
Rick, Washington State, what's on your mind?
unidentified
Hey, good morning. Good morning.
So I've been handing out samples of bodies and Brain Force Ultra to some of my co-workers, and it dawned on me that y'all should make sample size packets.
chase geiser
That's a good idea.
unidentified
Just like, you know, 10 bodies and a little packet, and then on it, you know, the nutritional information, but also in big, bold letters, Infowarsstore.com, so the people can find it.
Because people love it, but I feel like a drug dealer, you know, breaking it down into little baggies and putting a note on it, you know.
So it just occurred to me that you guys ought to do that.
It would make things a lot easier to help the funds, you know.
chase geiser
Yeah, that's a really good idea.
I appreciate that.
You know, hey, the first Coupa Turbo Force Plus is free, but you're going to have to pay for the next one.
Great idea, Rick.
I appreciate it.
I do want to cover this one story before we end the program this morning.
FISA reauthorization bill at risk of collapse after Trump pushed, creating headache for Speaker Johnson.
So...
We've got a couple of stories here.
We'll dive in. Speaker Mike Johnson to vote against warrant requirement for FISA spying on Americans.
So we know that the FISA courts were used to spy on the Trump campaign.
We know that the Patriot Act was ushered in because of this terrorism and the terrorism was used as an excuse, a pretext to violate the privacy and rights of of all American citizens Edward Snowden famously revealed the extent of the espionage on the American people now we have Speaker Johnson voting against requiring warrants for FISA's spying on Americans in the name of national security it seems like we just can't get these neocons out of the party let's see what Marjorie Taylor Greene had to say about it I sent a letter out to my colleagues yesterday morning.
marjorie taylor greene
The current discussions in our conference meeting this morning is about FISA, but it's pretty clear and obvious and being whispered among the conference.
Mike Johnson does not have the support of the conference.
The letter that I sent has been well received, and it was basically speaking the quiet part out loud.
He's in there urging members to reauthorize FISA. And I don't think he has the votes for it right now, is what I'm gathering.
We're going to be working on this.
We do not believe in warrantless spying on the American people, especially when this bill carves out the ability for Congress to be notified When a member of Congress is going to be looked at through the FISA court, that's completely unfair.
The same thing should apply for the American people.
But Mike Johnson doesn't have the trust of the conference, and that's become very clear.
unidentified
Are you going to vote against the rule today for the FISA bill?
marjorie taylor greene
I haven't openly decided to do that.
There's a classified briefing at 2 o'clock, and then there's also a briefing at 3 o'clock by judiciary.
unidentified
The rule votes at 1.30, though.
marjorie taylor greene
Yes, there's still a lot of conversations going on.
unidentified
Are you considering voting against it?
marjorie taylor greene
Of course I'm considering going against it.
I don't think it's fair for the FBI to be able to spy on the American people.
And what's set up here, the explanation that we've been given, is all of the things laid out and penalties If the FBI were to warrantless spy on the American people, except the same thing, it's like asking the deep state to hold itself accountable.
The FBI has abused the American people's trust.
The DOJ has abused the American people's trust.
So this doesn't give me confidence that it will stop it.
unidentified
Have you talked to President Trump about your motion to vacate effort?
marjorie taylor greene
Yes, I've spoken with President Trump.
I don't speak for President Trump.
I don't talk about what the private details of our conversation.
And as you can see from his post last night about what he thinks about FISA, he always makes his opinions open and clear.
chase geiser
So just remember that the same people who advocated for the abolition of TikTok in our country because of Chinese espionage on our data are advocating for our own government to be able to spy on us without a warrant.
That hypocrisy is very, very illuminating, folks.
Stay tuned for The Alex Jones Show.
daryl in north carolina
InfoWars.com forward slash show.
alex jones
It's been sold out for six months.
It's our number two bestseller.
It's X3.
The highest quality pure deep earth crystal iodine you're going to find anywhere with the two other types of iodine that are great for your body as well.
So to make sure no matter what type of body type you have, whatever your physiology is, it will supercharge you.
Look at this giant stack right here.
I can talk for hours about this on air and I'm planning to next week.
But the number one cause of cognitive disability in the world is iodine deficiency.
And all iodine is not created equal.
Most iodine is bound to other things in the environment, whether it's plants or animals you're eating, so you don't absorb it.
This is pure. It goes right into your cells.
It is essential for all electrochemical activity.
And despite the fact it's been sold out for six months, X3 is back in stock for 40% off for a limited time at infoworkstore.com.
So stock up on X3 right now.
Export Selection