Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
the news. | |
| Good morning, ladies This is the American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| We have a very big show for you today. | ||
| Lots of continuing stories today. | ||
| Some follow-up stories to some of the stories we covered yesterday and over the last week. | ||
| Including some updates to the horrific video we saw yesterday of the young woman getting her head bashed in the concrete. | ||
| People have done some digging. | ||
| They figured out that maybe not the rarest thing at this particular school. | ||
| But we'll get into that in a number of other stories, including planes falling out of the sky, Ukraine counteroffensive. | ||
| A lot to talk about today. | ||
| today so let's get into it here it is your daily dispatch all right here it is folks your daily dispatch for tuesday the 12th of march 2024 Boeing whistleblower John Barnett is found dead in his truck outside a South Carolina hotel just days after testifying in lawsuit against the aviation giant. | ||
| He was 62 years old, found dead in his truck in a hotel parking lot Saturday. | ||
| Cops made the announcement Monday. | ||
| The ex-quality manager at Boeing's North Charleston plant gave a deposition to Boeing as recently as last week, claiming they were using second-rate parts. | ||
| People, of course, immediately being suspicious of this. | ||
| Did he really kill himself? | ||
| Does this have to do with the giant problems Boeing is facing right now? | ||
| And could it be a cover-up of some sort? | ||
| We'll try to answer some of those questions in just a little bit. | ||
| But yes, a lot more plane issues in just the last 24 hours. | ||
| We'll get into that more later. Meanwhile, Trump motorcade driver testimony blows up J6 star witness Cassidy Hutchinson's claims Trump grabbed steering wheel of the beast, assaulted Secret Service. | ||
| Of course, that was ridiculous on the face of it. | ||
| But that's what happens when you have a show trial, when you only allow the prosecution to make arguments. | ||
| Yeah, it turns out the defense might have some counterfactuals to those arguments, but they aren't allowed to present them. | ||
| That's what makes it a show trial. | ||
| Meanwhile, Haiti's prime minister resigns as law and order collapses. | ||
| So Prime Minister Ariel Henry has not been in Haiti for a while since he fled to Puerto Rico, I believe. | ||
| But now he's released a video announcing his resignation. | ||
| All hail to King Barbecue. | ||
| May his reign be murderous. | ||
| Meanwhile, Andrew Tate and his brother have been arrested in Romania on a UK rape warrant. | ||
| Online influencer Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan have been arrested in Romania on a UK-issued warrant over sexual aggression allegations. | ||
| They've been detained on Monday for 24 hours on allegations of sexual aggression in a UK case dating back to 2012 to 2015, his PR team has said. | ||
| We still need to look a little bit more into this. | ||
| I don't know anything about the charges or anything, but the Matrix has him. | ||
| The Matrix has him. | ||
| I have it on good authority. | ||
| We'll get into that a little bit more later as well. | ||
| And finally, we have this. Hezbollah says it launched over 100 rockets at Israeli positions. | ||
| Lebanon's Hezbollah said Tuesday it launched over 100 rockets at Israeli military positions in retaliation for a strike on the country's east that killed one person the day before. | ||
| Israel has responded with airstrikes near Baalbek. | ||
| And it's expanding. | ||
| The war in the Middle East is expanding, taking pretty much the exact path that we thought it would a long time ago. | ||
| Look at that. I sped through that daily dispatch. | ||
| Usually I'm rambling on, and I really was worried I wasn't going to be able to finish it today. | ||
| And now I finished it too quickly and have nothing else to talk about. | ||
| Kidding. Of course, we have just unending amounts of things to talk about. | ||
| And while we're on the topic since our first story of the Daily Dispatch did have to do with Boeing and John Barnett the whistleblower being found dead in his truck to a supposedly self-inflicted gunshot wound We're good to go. | ||
| They'll report on it. They'll talk about it. | ||
| I think it's InfoWars' job to tell you that it's on purpose, by design, and perfectly in line with the globalist schemes to stop you from flying at all. | ||
| They'll do it one way or they'll do it another. | ||
| Just know that all of this stuff is happening is not an accident. | ||
| It's a conspiracy. | ||
| Once you learn that, everything sort of falls into place. | ||
| And stuff that doesn't make sense starts to make a little bit too much sense sometimes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. It's Tuesday, March 12th in the year of 2024. | |
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is The American Journal. | ||
| I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| How's everybody doing this morning? | ||
| Hope you're doing well. Last night, or perhaps it was this morning, I just saw it this morning for the first time, Tucker Carlson interviewed Chris Cuomo. | ||
| Two hour long conversation he released on X through his new platform, Tucker Carlson News Network. | ||
| It is one of the most fascinating conversations I've ever seen. | ||
| I'm almost tempted to just like spin. | ||
| I mean, it wouldn't even be possible. | ||
| The whole thing is two hours. | ||
| So we could probably end up maybe getting through like 15 minutes of it. | ||
| I spent the whole three hours on it. | ||
| But I'm tempted. | ||
| I'm tempted to just spend the whole show on this interview because it provides such a convenient platform to discuss all these different topics they get into. | ||
| And. | ||
| And I gotta admit, when I first started watching it, I was a little bit peeved at it. | ||
| I don't know, maybe this is my own thing, but we'll show you the beginning of this video and sort of talk about What Tucker's up to here. | ||
| I think my main takeaway is Tucker's still very much in the process of the awakening, I feel. | ||
| He's still very much in the goo pod and has not fully escaped the Matrix as of yet. | ||
| Same with Chris Cuomo, to be honest with you. | ||
| I mean, they talk about everything. | ||
| They get into just absolutely everything. | ||
| And it's just fascinating. | ||
| I almost just have to go to examples, so I'm not just being like, and then he said this, and then Tucker just said this, and then that was interesting. | ||
| The whole thing is fascinating, and we'll just begin with it here. | ||
| It's episode 80 of Tucker Carlson's show, a two-hour interview with Chris Cuomo. | ||
| Let's just start with clip number three, and I'll explain why I was sort of Hesitant to be fully on board with this. | ||
| As the conversation continued, I can see the value in it. | ||
| But at the same time, I don't want to criticize Tucker because I know what he's doing. | ||
| I know what his motivation is, and I think it's a good motivation. | ||
| At the same time, he's a little soft. | ||
| He's a little soft on Chris Cuomo, and he's a little bit too... | ||
| We'll watch the video, and then I'll explain it on the other side. | ||
| Let's go to clip three here. | ||
| Chris Cuomo is sitting in my living room. | ||
| Now, why is Chris Cuomo sitting in my living room, formerly of CNN? Well, I'd never met Chris Cuomo before today, and of course for years I was incredibly mean to Chris Cuomo on TV. Why? | ||
| I can't really say now. | ||
| But I'll say this. | ||
| He was one of the very first people to call me completely out of the blue, no idea how he got my number, after I left my job last spring. | ||
| And that began a series of conversations, very long conversations, in which I discovered that Chris Cuomo is a really interesting person. | ||
| And though we disagree on some things, we don't disagree on everything at all. | ||
| And I thought, wow, I wonder how many other people like Chris Cuomo are out there, people I've dismissed or mocked because we disagreed on some things, who actually, if you got to know them, you might learn something. | ||
| So that might be a useful exercise. | ||
| And so with that, a conversation with Chris Cuomo begins. | ||
| Let's pause real quick. | ||
| You know, that intro... I don't know. | ||
| I mean, I think Tucker's a very sly guy. | ||
| I think he's a sneakily sly guy. | ||
| I think his slyness is a subtle one. | ||
| The slyness is sly in and of itself. | ||
| Do you know what I mean? He says, what I figured out was that Chris Cuomo's a very interesting guy. | ||
| I don't know if I want to be called an interesting guy. | ||
| By somebody who used to hate me. | ||
| I guess it's better than being called what Chris Cuomo was and still is, which was a mouthpiece of the leftist establishment knowingly spreading lies to millions of people that physically, tangibly messed up their lives and hurt people. | ||
| So... You know, there's that. | ||
| I think he's like, I don't know why I was so mean to him. | ||
| It's like, I do. Go back and watch your shows. | ||
| It's because he was telling lies. | ||
| And also acting like a conceited jackass the whole time. | ||
| And also covering up for his brother who was governor of New York. | ||
| And spearheaded a lot of the COVID... You know, solutions that ended up killing literally tens of thousands of people. | ||
| His brother's going on trial now. | ||
| He's being investigated for what he did under COVID, specifically sending sick people into nursing homes and likely causing huge amounts of death throughout of it. | ||
| Chris Cuomo, during COVID especially, was one of the main mouthpieces pushing all of the things that destroyed this virus. | ||
| So, he had lots of good reason not to like Chris Cuomo. | ||
| A lot of good reason. | ||
| He was a buffoon, but a dangerous one because he was given respect that he didn't deserve because he told lies that hurt people. | ||
| So, like, starting off this interview, I'm like... | ||
| What do you mean you don't remember why you were so mean to Chris Cuomo? | ||
| Did you go back and watch the old shows? | ||
| Did you see what you were saying about him? | ||
| You may have been mean, but for very good reason. | ||
| But at the same time, Tucker Carlson didn't say, oh, I used to be mean to Chris Cuomo, and then he called me out of the blue. | ||
| We had long conversations, and he's a really nice, great guy. | ||
| He's very smart, intelligent. | ||
| No, he said he's very interesting. | ||
| This is where I think Tucker Carlson's like... | ||
| It's like, are you being sneaky? | ||
| Are you being sneaky? | ||
| Are you even capable of being sneaky? | ||
| Or is this how sneakiness manifests? | ||
| That you're just like, not entirely honest. | ||
| When you're like, I talked to Chris Cuomo and he's insane about certain things. | ||
| So let's talk about it. I don't know. | ||
| I don't know. I was a little hesitant to just... | ||
| Forget who Chris Cuomo is and was and what he has been a part of for such a long time. | ||
| And maybe it's just because I was never a part of that. | ||
| And Tucker Carlson was. | ||
| And he talks about it in the interview. | ||
| And it seems like both of these guys, and this may be the big takeaway and the most interesting thing about this interview to me, Is you really get a sense of what it's like to be in the mainstream media where you sort of half-knowingly are being controlled and are being persuaded to say things that are lies and you sort of go along with it so you sort of feel guilty about it At the same time you feel used, | ||
| at the same time you're in the milieu and you're in the mix, and it's a constant state of being for you to be surrounded by these lies and be pushed in different directions, and then suddenly you're live on air and saying them. | ||
| You're like, is this right? I don't know, but I don't have time to think about it. | ||
| And only once they get out do they have time to look back and sort of actually perceive what they'd been going through for so long. | ||
| That maybe seems obvious from the outside to the rest of us. | ||
| And so they're both sort of in that same position. | ||
| So maybe he just has more kindred feeling with Chris Cuomo. | ||
| But again, that to me was sort of the most interesting part is almost like seeing cult members escape the cult, be deprogrammed, and now be able to actually understand and talk about what they'd been going through when at the time they were just in the cult. | ||
| And just doing what the Colt was doing, and it just seemed like the right thing to do at the time. | ||
| They seemed trapped. And only once you extricate yourself from that situation can you actually look back with any clarity, even if it's not total clarity, which I think is where these guys currently sit. | ||
| So let's go back to it, and we'll keep commenting along. | ||
| So one of the reasons I think that you called me was because we'd had such similar lives, and you're one of the few people who kind of understand. | ||
| And both of us spent decades in one world, were exiled from it. | ||
| And I think the question is, like, what if we learn from this? | ||
| You first. I'm still trying to figure it out. | ||
| And I knew it was important to reach out when... | ||
| You were going through your exit, let's call it, because I knew the pain of it, and I knew the challenge of it. | ||
| And everything is different, but I do believe that one of the lessons I've learned is You have to think about how other people are being affected by situations, especially once you have pain in your own life. | ||
| And it doesn't matter what you agree with, what you like, what you don't like. | ||
| It's all gotten so far removed from humanity that the idea that... | ||
| I don't like that Tucker Carlson takes a bite out of my ass on his show. | ||
| I think you had good reason not to like me. | ||
| I think that would be fair. But... | ||
| That that means that this is not somebody who you should care about as a human being. | ||
| And I feel like our culture isn't working anymore. | ||
| That everybody retreats with their own. | ||
| And as a result, everybody is against one another for the same kinds of reasons. | ||
| And it's not working. | ||
| And if it's not working, then why aren't we trying something different? | ||
| Why wouldn't I reach out to somebody who has a family and who has a following and is dealing with a hard time to see if I can help and see what's going on in their life and what they're about? | ||
| And I was concerned about calling you at first because I thought you might be thinking that this is like a spite phone call or something. | ||
| You know what I mean? Or be like, why are you calling me? | ||
| What do you want to gloat or something? | ||
| You know, I didn't want to make anything worse for you. | ||
| But... As you say, there's such tremendous power in conversation. | ||
| Yes. We only know what we're told about people and the snippets that people want us to see and the context. | ||
| And I'm not saying that, like, you know, you're one benefit of context away from never of saying anything that I don't think you should say. | ||
| But... What is lost by doing this? | ||
| What is lost by this? | ||
| How can this not be helpful to sit across from somebody and talk to them instead of about them? | ||
| So, of course, I couldn't agree with you more, which is why we're here, and I think both of us have tried to talk directly to people that we disagree with legitimately on some things, but because it's a really useful and important experience. | ||
| So why doesn't it happen? | ||
| It does make you kind of wonder, maybe there are forces trying to prevent those conversations, and what's the motive there? | ||
| I call it the game. You and I have been in the game for a long time. | ||
| And whether you like it or not, whether you mean it or not, you wind up playing the game. | ||
| You can, especially with the platform that you had, you wind up essentially picking sides. | ||
| And you wind up having agendas either that present themselves to you or are foisted upon you. | ||
| But either way, you wind up in the same place. | ||
| And in doing that, it becomes habit. | ||
| It's what people are celebrating around you. | ||
| It's what you see around you. | ||
| People start to come after you. | ||
| We've got to pause now. | ||
| But I'm getting sucked in again. | ||
| I'm getting sucked in again. I just wanted to keep watching it because there's so many different avenues to explore here. | ||
| He says our culture isn't working anymore because people don't talk to one another. | ||
| The problem is that that didn't just happen. | ||
| And the real problem is that... | ||
| And I get not wanting to fall into the partisan divide. | ||
| And there's a danger of becoming the Republican cheerleader. | ||
| The Republicans are my team. | ||
| I support whatever they want. | ||
| Tucker Carlson, I think, just right after this gets into it, how he felt duped during the Iraq war. | ||
| For being Team Republican and going, we're for the war, so I better be for the war, and feeling terrible about playing that part in the media in 2002. | ||
| I think there's a large degree of truth to that. | ||
| On the other hand, I think that this is not one of those, well, both sides sort of thing. | ||
| I think it's pretty obvious, if you've been watching this, Anything for the last 6, 8, 10 years, one side is really desperate to have conversations. | ||
| That's our side because we genuinely believe we have good arguments and that if we could just talk about this, people could just honestly contend with the ideas that we would come out on top. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We like still as... | |
| Hopeless as it may seem, believe that you can get through to people, you can convince people, you can convert people to a correct way of thinking through your words and through evidence and through information. | ||
| The other side calls us Nazis and says our words are violence. | ||
| So this isn't like a, well, you know, both sides, you know, get into their corners and don't want to talk to the other side. | ||
| Our side loves talking to other people because you're dumb. | ||
| You people don't know what you're talking about. | ||
| When you're forced to actually confront reality, your whole system falls absolutely apart. | ||
| That's why AI is going through so many problems right now because they've created a machine that tells the truth and now have to convince it to lie on their behalf. | ||
| And it reminds me of the comedian. | ||
| We played a video a while ago of a comedian. | ||
| Jamie Kilstein, who was a big part of the Me Too movement and then was subjected to it himself and suddenly got the view from the other side and was like, oh my God, is this what it's like? | ||
| False allegations and I can't defend myself and now I'm silenced on Twitter so everybody can say what they want about me? | ||
| And this is a big realization for him, and he describes waking up basically every morning and being excited of just like, whose life are we destroying today? | ||
| Who are we attacking? | ||
| And in that situation as well, it's portrayed as like, well, both sides do this, and this is toxic, and we need to stop, guys. | ||
| And we're on this side going, we don't do that. | ||
| What the hell are you talking about? | ||
| We don't sit here and wake up every morning going, who's violating our arbitrary and ever-changing rule set that we can destroy? | ||
| Whose career can we ruin today? | ||
| We don't do that. You do. | ||
| And then people, they do it, but they're convinced that it's because we're doing it, but we're not doing it. | ||
| So it's just them doing it. | ||
| Over and over. And then when they eventually realize it's wrong, they go, gosh, you know, I can't believe we did that to each other. | ||
| We shouldn't have done that. | ||
| We were never doing that. | ||
| We were not the ones doing that. | ||
| We are not the ones who just immediately jump to Nazi white supremacists when confronted with very basic arguments about border security or crime and policing. | ||
| We are not the ones who shut down the conversation. | ||
| We are not the ones who... | ||
| Immediately resorts to ad hominem attacks or name-calling about you're a Nazi, white supremacist, racist, whatever, to shut down the entire conversation. | ||
| So, on one hand, I get it. | ||
| I like it. It's good. | ||
| It is a good conversation. | ||
| They do get into a lot of different topics that you usually don't hear either side on. | ||
| So, you know, they get into abortion. | ||
| They get into Ashley Babbitt in January 6th. | ||
| You know, they get into that stuff. | ||
| And it is interesting and it is extremely compelling seeing two people from different sides talk about it in ways other than name calling and spouting talking points. | ||
| But at the same time, you got to put the blame where it belongs. | ||
| And it's the mainstream media's sole tactic to silence conversation, silence dissent, present any disagreement with their dictates. | ||
| Even if those dictates are brand new and no one's ever heard them before, you either agree with them or you aren't just wrong. | ||
| You're a bad person. | ||
| You're evil. | ||
| And this is sort of the difference. | ||
| I guess conservatives think Democrats... | ||
| Or liberals, Republicans think that whatever the divide is, it's not a party game. | ||
| And, you know, it's funny that he's like, I call it the game. | ||
| We're all just playing a game. | ||
| I'm not playing a game. | ||
| We're not playing a game. | ||
| Not everybody is playing a game. | ||
| Some people are literally just trying to tell the truth. | ||
| But the people inside the game see you just telling the truth and they go, what game is he playing? | ||
| Oh, what's this game he's after? | ||
| What's, what game could he be telling the truth? | ||
| Why is he telling the truth? | ||
| What is he trying to win? | ||
| We could just be telling the truth. | ||
| You people are playing a game. | ||
| You people see this all as a big game where you're either winning or losing. | ||
| We see it as the American people losing because you people are playing this stupid game. | ||
| He calls it a game. | ||
| Let's go back to the video here. | ||
| We'll see what Tucker says. | ||
| I'll start interrupting more often. | ||
| But it's all of these things. | ||
| Even Chris Cuomo saying, we only know what people tell us. | ||
| It's like, yeah, if you don't do any research, yeah, you only know things people tell you. | ||
| Or if you're entirely gullible, And, you know, willing to accept whatever someone tells you, you learn something about them. | ||
| But I know a lot about people from things they don't tell me. | ||
| Or the things that they tell me I disbelieve and that tells me about the person because they're lying about this for a certain reason. | ||
| You can learn a lot about people despite what they tell you or even if they tell you nothing. | ||
| There's just little statements like that that just seems like they're true. | ||
| Yeah, you only know what people tell you. | ||
| Yeah, totally, man. No, not really. | ||
| No, you can actually just figure things out for yourself. | ||
| Let's go back, because again, I think this is where Tuck Carlson sort of laments his past playing this part of Republican apparatchik. | ||
| Let's watch....packing what I'm saying, and they're getting it wrong, or they're getting it right, and I still don't like it. | ||
| That's the culture, and that's what the media enforces. | ||
| We are not supposed to be doing this. | ||
| I am doing something bad right now. | ||
| Not just wrong. This is bad. | ||
| I am giving a platform. | ||
| That's the new one. Pause it again. | ||
| It's so funny. He's like, I'm giving a platform. | ||
| No, Tucker Carlson's giving a platform to you, you big dummy. | ||
| And nobody here is saying, like, Tucker Carlson, you're bad for letting Chris Cuomo on. | ||
| I'm sort of like, well, maybe you shouldn't treat him so gently because he was a bad part of the media and you had good reason to attack him back then. | ||
| So don't walk that back. | ||
| You know, don't sit there and go, I don't know why. | ||
| I was just mean to you for no reason. | ||
| Literally later, Tug Carlson says verbatim, pardon the French, he's like, Chris Cuomo's like, why were you going so hard on me? | ||
| And Tug Carlson's like, I guess because I'm a dick. | ||
| I guess because I'm just like a big jerk. | ||
| And it's like, no, you're not. | ||
| You were doing that because he was doing bad things. | ||
| Chris Cuomo was doing bad things. | ||
| And even Chris Cuomo in that statement right there, the one just a second ago, he says... | ||
| It doesn't mean you're a bad person. | ||
| It doesn't mean I don't care about you as a human and a family man or whatever. | ||
| It's like, yeah, fine. | ||
| That's fine. But when it comes to Chris Cuomo or any lefty so-called news presenter presenting lies, I care about the people they're lying to. | ||
| I care about the society they're destroying. | ||
| I care about millions of people That they're hurting by deceiving them. | ||
| So it's not that I don't care about that person. | ||
| It's that I'm angry, mad, resentful of that person for hurting all of these other people. | ||
| It's actually the care for the other people that inspires my dislike of the people lying to them. | ||
| So it's just again another sort of false dichotomy where you go, oh well it's bad to hate that person. | ||
| Well, I don't think you should hate anybody, but it's not bad to dislike somebody who is causing harm to other people. | ||
| It's not that you just hate them as a person because you're unfeeling. | ||
| It's because you care about the people they're hurting. | ||
| It's a nice distinction. | ||
| It's a neat distinction, but it is certainly a distinction. | ||
| And the other big difference, they're like, oh, we're so similar. | ||
| Really, it was... What was Chris Cuomo fired over versus what was Tucker fired over? | ||
| Chris Cuomo was fired for sort of a number of reasons. | ||
| The official story given was that he was helping Andrew Cuomo, who was governor at the time, write things for the media. | ||
| I'm no specialist in media ethics, but I think maybe when an elected official is having a crisis managed by the media that's supposed to be Not literally in bed with writing the statements of the politicians that they're covering. | ||
| I think you may have crossed some lines there by not being truthful about where some of those statements were coming from. | ||
| Tucker Carlson was fired because he was covering January 6th in a way that they didn't like. | ||
| He was actually going out on a limb covering things and talking about things that his network knew were true but didn't want discussed. | ||
| You know, Chris Cuomo wasn't out there on CNN going, you know, actually, I think we should question the vaccine. | ||
| I think we should ask where COVID came from and then got fired because he was pursuing the truth doggedly. | ||
| That is what happened with Tucker. | ||
| So, again, wonderful conversation, very interesting insights. | ||
| We can get into all of this sort of stuff. | ||
| But at the same time, A little too soft for me. | ||
| It's a little too soft. Tucker Carlson was right the whole time. | ||
| Tucker Carlson got fired because he was pursuing the truth in a resolute sort of way and was unwilling to bend to the desires of the production to silence himself. | ||
| Chris Cuomo got fired because he was a big goober that was helping a big goober brother be big goobers together. | ||
| So, not the same. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Harrison Smith here, Infowars.com, band.video. | ||
| This is the American Journal. Moving on now. | ||
| Like I said, it took that whole 20-minute segment to get through about one minute of the interview, so I don't think we're going to be making it through all two hours of today's show. | ||
| It would be fun, though. | ||
| It would be fun. | ||
| It's just a good jumping off point to talk about the differing views of the world that you find from the left and the right. | ||
| A very real distinction. | ||
| And I think that the main takeaway for me is that Chris Cuomo is still wrong about everything. | ||
| He still thinks that what he was pushing during COVID was the right thing to do. | ||
| He's defensive about all the stuff that he pushed, even though now it's been incontrovertibly proven wrong. | ||
| He was wrong. | ||
| They were all wrong, but they rationalize it. | ||
| They're like, yeah, but what's the problem with saying what the experts were saying? | ||
| Well, because the experts were lying and wrong, and you were their news person. | ||
| You're not just a mouthpiece of the powerful. | ||
| It's very frustrating and confusing how people, and that's why it's worth exploring as you go, okay, these people were so wrong. | ||
| Now they've been proven wrong. Are they contrite? | ||
| Do they express regret at having fallen for the lies? | ||
| Dr. Carlson does when he talks about, you know, the Iraq war. | ||
| He's like, I was wrong. I was fooled. | ||
| I was tricked. I feel bad about it. | ||
| I still feel bad about it. You know, 30 years later, 20 years later. | ||
| But these people don't. Chris Cuomo doesn't feel bad about pushing lies. | ||
| He's like, ah, well, I thought it was, you know, I thought I was doing what I was supposed to be doing. | ||
| Repeating what the powerful told me without looking into it. | ||
| Like, okay, so you've learned nothing. | ||
| It's okay. You've learned no lessons at all then. | ||
| Great. Wonderful. | ||
| And he's calling January 6th an insurrection. | ||
| I mean, just... It is interesting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is very interesting. I call it the game. | |
| We're all playing the game. | ||
| Okay, you're all playing the game. | ||
| All the rest of us are dying. | ||
| Thank you. But we'll move on. | ||
| We will move on, but not too far. | ||
| We won't stray too far afield because... | ||
| We had a big event yesterday in the mainstream leftist fake dissent media. | ||
| Leftist outlet Deadspin is coming to an end. | ||
| And it's just the latest corpse to throw on the pile. | ||
| I went ahead and went through it. | ||
| This is just off the top of my head. | ||
| I know I'm missing some. | ||
| I know there are some that I don't have in this stack. | ||
| But let's take a little trip back. | ||
| A little trip back in time. | ||
| And I chose for a deadline here, a stopping point, or a starting point actually, where to begin the list of leftist media shutdowns. | ||
| I thought I'd go with who's been shut down since InfoWars was kicked off of the internet. | ||
| Luckily we're back, largely thanks to Elon Musk and X, and for your support at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| But it was 2018 when, simultaneously, Infowars and Alex Jones and many people associated with him were removed wholesale from every social media site in a single day, including Spotify and other outlets that were very necessary for us running our business. | ||
| Since then, and they thought that would be a death blow, we have not only survived the censorship, but have survived attack after attack. | ||
| After attack after attack. | ||
| Some you know, some you don't. | ||
| Some are public. Some are secret. | ||
| Some are through the courts. | ||
| Some are through other means. | ||
| But throughout it all, we have survived because we actually give our audience what they want. | ||
| The truth. The whole truth and nothing but the truth. | ||
| Whereas the leftist media, despite not being attacked, quite the opposite, being supported in every possible way by their mainstream media allies, funded by big banks and corporations, given essentially legal license to report all sorts of false crap without having to pay for it. | ||
| We've been subjected to massive attacks. | ||
| They've been supported. We have survived. | ||
| They have failed. What's behind this? | ||
| We tell the truth. They don't. | ||
| We have an audience. They don't. | ||
| You support us and we thank you so much at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And they are the subject of corporate sponsorships who control what they say and the American people aren't interested. | ||
| So since 2018, let's take a little trip through the graveyard of leftist media. | ||
| 2023 BuzzFeed News will shut down. | ||
| LA Times to lay off at least 115 people in the newsroom. | ||
| That was just January of this year. | ||
| Jezebel, the sharp-edged feminist website, shutting down in November. | ||
| Former digital media darling Vice to end website layoff hundreds. | ||
| This about two weeks ago. | ||
| Deadspin sold by Geo Media editorial staff to be laid off. | ||
| This is the one that broke yesterday. | ||
| Good riddance to Deadspin. | ||
| Left-wing website ThinkProgress abruptly shuts down, laying off all staff. | ||
| This was back in 2019. | ||
| Liberal news site Splinter shutting down back in 2019 as well. | ||
| Texas Observer. Legendary crusading liberal magazine. | ||
| It's closing and laying off all of its staff. | ||
| That happened about a little under a year ago in 2023. | ||
| Upstart digital news media, the outlet, the messenger, shuts down less than a year after launch. | ||
| This isn't even counting, like, the CNN Plus thing they tried with... | ||
| The clown-looking dude. | ||
| Left-wing outlet. | ||
| The Intercept lays off more than a dozen staff. | ||
| The Intercept actually has some good stuff, but again, it falls into this line. | ||
| The point is, InfoWars stands triumphant amid a field of corpses. | ||
| A field of left-wing, mainstream media talking point, think-tank parroting leftist rags. | ||
| And they're confused by this. | ||
| They're baffled at this. | ||
| They're writing articles saying, what's going on? | ||
| Why does nobody trust us? | ||
| It's because you keep lying, folks. | ||
| It's because nobody trusts people that lie to them all the time. | ||
| And that's not the people's fault for not trusting you. | ||
| It's your fault for not giving them a reason to trust you. | ||
| So this is just sort of a farewell message. | ||
| Au revoir. Goodbye, leftist media. | ||
| Goodbye, liars. | ||
| And also, welcome back. | ||
| Because you know all these things are being resurrected. | ||
| You know all of these things, including Jezebel, are being resurrected from the grave through the injection of hundreds of millions of dollars from people who despise America, our way of life, our people, our religion, everything about what we do and who we are. | ||
| They are willing to pay out of the nose to destroy. | ||
| So they're coming back. | ||
| They're not going to stop. | ||
| They will shift the funding to other media outlets that will rise from the ashes, only to inevitably collapse in disgrace when their fraud pitters out into pathetic nothingness. | ||
| SimplyAmerican.com has a story, the collapse of leftist media. | ||
| And they talk about a report released in January of this year comparing recent layoffs of U.S.-based companies. | ||
| One of the industries reviewed the news industry is one of the segments that has taken the hardest hit. | ||
| Estimates show that between January and November of 2023, 2,681 journalism jobs were lost. | ||
| Oh dear. Oh goodness. | ||
| Whatever will we do? | ||
| I say news which includes digital broadcasts in print and is tracked as a subset of the media announced 528 layoffs in January up 1,660% from the 30 tracked in December. | ||
| The highest monthly total since March of 2023 when 532 cuts were recorded. | ||
| So just massive hemorrhaging of the dying leftist media as America moves on, as the American people no longer listen to liars, have chosen the side of truth over the side of deception. | ||
| Are casting off the scales from their eyes and maybe just looking for themselves at the world around them and seeing that everything they've been told by these left-wing media outlets, which themselves are just a deformed mutated arm of the mainstream media, aren't worth the paper they're printed on. | ||
| We'll be right back. In a physical real way, | ||
| the collapse of law and order and infrastructure and social cohesion and intelligence and general understanding of the world, but also a more spiritual, ethical, moral collapse as those in the pursuit of power find restrictions to the exercise of that power inconvenient and are doing away with them by tricking people into thinking that The restrictions and laws and constitutional authority where it's designated as racist, | ||
| probably. I don't know. | ||
| Whatever they have to call it. They'll call it whatever they need to to get people to go along with their power grab. | ||
| And again, that's the important thing to understand. | ||
| Something I think maybe I need to reemphasize. | ||
| Is talking about how these things aren't just happening, but happening on purpose, by design. | ||
| A good example of this would be something like clip number one here. | ||
| Let's go to clip number one. | ||
| There's a bill to ban forever chemicals, that is microplastics, nanoplastics, PFAs, things like that, in menstrual products like tampons. | ||
| Let's go to clip number one now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
State lawmakers are presenting a new bill focusing on menstrual products. | |
| The proposed law is called the Tampon Act. | ||
| It would remove forever chemicals from these products. | ||
| These compounds have been linked to severe health problems, including hormone disruption, kidney and liver damage, immune system disruption, and of course, cancer. | ||
| Right now, PFAS are found in levels ranging from 11 to 154 parts per million in the worst offending period products. | ||
| These are higher levels than are found in tap water. | ||
| This is a reintroduction of a similar bill from 2023. | ||
| I'm sorry, but do you realize how lost we are when the woman goes, these are higher levels than are found in tap water? | ||
| Okay, wait. Tap water is so bad that you use it as a comparison of like... | ||
| And it's even worse than tap water. | ||
| Well, what the hell's in our tap water? | ||
| Let's deal with that, too. | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
| Crazy. Absolutely crazy. | ||
| But obviously, the question is why? | ||
| Why are hormone-altering, sterilizing... | ||
| Or, you know, just hormone manipulating materials in things like tampons that are essentially dejected directly into your bloodstream. | ||
| Why? Why? | ||
| Why is it like that? | ||
| Why is it that way? | ||
| There's a great picture, and I didn't find it today, but it was just a comparison between the same product. | ||
| I think it was a wheat product, like oatmeal. | ||
| I think it was Quaker oats. | ||
| And they have the American ingredient list and the European ingredient list. | ||
| The European ingredient list is like wheat, cornstarch, maybe like preservation agent, but I don't even think they had that. | ||
| But it's just like, you know, the things you would expect in oatmeal. | ||
| Oat. Meal. | ||
| You know, just normal, natural things. | ||
| Just put in a box for your convenience. | ||
| And then the American version is like hydrogenated oil from soybean extractions. | ||
| You know, whatever. | ||
| Just like these impermountable chemical hogwash. | ||
| And it's just like, but why? | ||
| But why, though? | ||
| Maybe you could make the argument that like, well, you know, if you put in this chemical, it gives it a two-month longer shelf life, which means we can be selling all of this and it can make us a couple billion dollars. | ||
| You go, okay, so you're willing to put plastic in the food, poisons in the food to make a little extra money. | ||
| Okay, not a good reason, but at least a reason, at least a valid argument for why you'd want to put these things in. | ||
| But what if the real... | ||
| Purpose of putting these things in is because they cause damage. | ||
| What if the reason atrazine is used so pervasively? | ||
| What if the reason that chloramaquat is allowed to be sprayed on our weed products? | ||
| This is it. Thanks, guys. Yeah, okay. | ||
| Let's just read this, shall we? UK version of Quaker Oat So Simple. | ||
| Ingredients. Whole grain rolled oats. | ||
| Sugar. Freeze-dried raspberry. | ||
| Freeze-dried strawberry. Natural flavoring. | ||
| Ingredients in America Vitamin A, | ||
| palmitrate, reduced iron, pyridoxine, hydrochloride, riboflavin, thiamine, mononitrate, folic acid. | ||
| What the hell are those things doing in there, I wonder? | ||
| You really gotta ask. | ||
| You really gotta wonder. Obviously they're not necessary. | ||
| Look at the column right next to it. | ||
| It's not necessary to do that in Europe. | ||
| Why do they do it in America? | ||
| Why do we allow this... | ||
| Why are these things in our food? | ||
| Why are they in our sanitary products? | ||
| Why are they in our face washes? | ||
| Why are they in the water itself? | ||
| Why? On purpose, by design. | ||
| Not, you know, because people don't know what they do. | ||
| They do know exactly what they do, and you can see evidence of that. | ||
| In things like lawsuits that corporations file or lobbying campaigns that they launch in order to stop these things from being forbidden. | ||
| Just like how the tobacco industry lobbied very hard to not have scientific inquiry into the effects of smoking, the health effects of smoking. | ||
| Not because... They don't care and don't know because they do know it's bad because they don't want you finding out about that. | ||
| I mean, fluoride is naturally added to the water. | ||
| Some fluoride exists naturally in wells and things like that, but a very small amount and not the same industrial runoff that's used to poison the tap water purposely and by design. | ||
| The bad effects, the negative effects, the sterilization, the hormone manipulation, the turning the frogs gay. | ||
| That's not like something that they don't know. | ||
| They do know. It's okay. | ||
| So they know, but they allow it to happen. | ||
| Is it because they save a couple bucks? | ||
| Okay. In that case, then they're immoral, like hugely, massively, criminally immoral because they're willing to poison the earth itself and As well as their customers to make a couple extra bucks. | ||
| Not a good excuse. But even worse than that is the knowledge that it's done on purpose, by design, in a deliberate attempt to destroy humanity. | ||
| And you don't have to listen to me. | ||
| You can just listen to what their plans are for the future. | ||
| How they get up in front of you and tell you that the world is ending because there's too many people. | ||
| That we need less people. | ||
| You have to take them at their word. | ||
| And if these people think they're on a holy crusade to save the earth from humanity, you don't think they can morally justify secretly poisoning you, quietly filling your food with sterilization agents? | ||
| And these people think they're on a holy crusade. | ||
| They are demented. They're cult members. | ||
| And they're in charge of the food production supply. | ||
| So that's what they're doing, and they're doing it on purpose. | ||
| And I've talked about this before, that if you take Alex's statement, they're putting chemicals in the water to turn the frickin' frogs gay, the thing that really sounds ridiculous about it is actually the first part, where he says, they, they are putting. | ||
| Because that makes it sound like it's intentional. | ||
| But it is. But it is intentional. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They know exactly what the effects of these chemicals are, and they're doing it on purpose, by design, in the same way that now they're talking about, and they may already be putting both bugs in food by labeling it something other than bugs, right? Natural protein source or whatever code word they have to disguise the fact that you're eating cockroaches. | ||
| Or they'll put in some other chemical agent with massive, horrific side effects that they choose not to tell you about. | ||
| Like, I don't know, vaccines. | ||
| They're talking about, you can eat your vaccines. | ||
| From now on, our lettuce will vaccinate you. | ||
| Because they're putting vaccines in you. | ||
| Because... If they don't require your permission, they don't require your awareness. | ||
| If they can force you to get a jab, what's the difference between holding you down and injecting you with a needle, subjecting to it forcefully and knowingly, versus maybe what would be the big difference if they... | ||
| Chloroformed you and inject you with stuff while you were asleep and you woke up with no memory of it and had no idea that you'd been attacked or been injected with anything. | ||
| If they don't need your permission, they don't require your awareness. | ||
| And so once you're aware of what they're doing and can put a stop to it, you can defeat their plans. | ||
| But just know that it's not an accident or a mistake or necessary that tampons be filled with microplastics. | ||
| It's a choice they made not to save money, but because... | ||
| They're pretty open about their anti-human agenda that this fulfills. | ||
| And sorry, ladies, if you're sterilized because of it, you're just a sacrifice they're willing to make. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| I'm not sure who it was. | ||
| Who on the crew was just telling me that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Was that Reese? I couldn't tell your voice. | |
| So, yeah, as I mentioned, as we're reading those two ingredients lists, and just like you can't even pronounce half of it, you definitely don't know what it is. | ||
| And I wasn't aware of this either. | ||
| Till Reese just chimed in my ear during the break there. | ||
| Citric acid, not lemon juice. | ||
| It's not actually lemon juice, as you may be led to believe with its sweet-sounding name. | ||
| Citric acid from Dr. | ||
| Ryan Monaghan. Peacefulmountainmedicine.com. | ||
| Citric acid, a common food additive with an uncommon source. | ||
| Citric acid is one of those common food additives in the ingredients list. | ||
| While citric acid is indeed found in fruits like lemon, oranges, grapefruit, and limes, and was originally isolated from lemon juice in 1784, this is not the form of citric acid that's used in food products worldwide today. | ||
| Citric acid that is manufactured, citric acid, MCA, Pfizer began producing in 1919 through a microbial process involving a mutant strain of aspergillus niger, also known as black mold. | ||
| The present day process of creating manufactured citric acid involves feeding sugars derived from GMO corn to black mold, which then ferments them to form manufactured citric acid. | ||
| Don't you love the way that it's just horror upon horror? | ||
| I can't even use normal sugar. | ||
| First you gotta GMO manipulate corn, then take the sugar from that, create black mold out of it, turn that into something you call manufactured citric acid, Our food system is so screwed, people. | ||
| And it really is just a... | ||
| It's a universal thing. | ||
| That's what you've got to understand is that whether they even coordinate or not, the effects are coordinated in that you've got Pfizer creating this ingredient. | ||
| Let me continue here for a moment. | ||
| It's not just found in foods. | ||
| This citric acid crepe, or rather it says... | ||
| This black mold, due to the potential for fragments of this black mold to make their way into the finished products for manufactured citric acid, this toxic inflammatory substance is likely being ingested by consumers of products containing citric acid. | ||
| Even with high heat processing to kill it, research has shown that the mold can still elicit an inflammatory response. | ||
| Because it was used before the FDA even existed, it was granted GRAS status, that is generally recognized as safe status, even though no scientific testing has ever been conducted on its long-term consumption by humans. | ||
| As more and more people develop digestive problems and chronic inflammatory diseases, it's important to be aware of the adverse effects. | ||
| The endless list of additives used by the food industry to manufacture their food-like products can have in our body. | ||
| It's getting to the point where processed and packaged foods could be more accurately described as chemical products rather than food products. | ||
| Of course, I remind you. | ||
| Go to Infowarsstore.com to counteract many of the effects of our so-called food having on your body, including things like inflammation. | ||
| BodyEase is on sale right now at 40% off. | ||
| Turmeric cucurmanoids can counteract those inflammatory experiences in your body. | ||
| No medical claims being made here, but I am making claims about the unhealthiness of our diet and how you have to supplement in order to both make up for what you're lacking and Counteract what is there. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| We don't just give you the information. | ||
| We give you what you need to fight back against it. | ||
| But do you understand how convenient this is for something, an organization especially like Pfizer? | ||
| We've got the pharmaceutical companies who rely on and make products Trillions of dollars off of the unhealthy American population which itself is made unhealthy because of the unhealthiness of our food and how this forms a symbiotic relationship where you create the problem that you then pay to solve and that these organizations as well as the hospitals and the doctors and the medical schools and the insurance companies are all owned by umbrella organizations like BlackRock Again, | ||
| create the market that they then fulfill. | ||
| It's a worldwide, global, all-of-society conspiracy, whether they're even conspiring or not. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| Just looking over some of the articles that I have for today. | ||
| I remembered another part in the Tucker Carlson interview that I actually do want to play a little bit later. | ||
| I wonder if the crew can crop out. | ||
| It's around 41 minutes in, and Tucker goes on this rant about architecture that is superlative. | ||
| It is excellent. And it's another one of these examples where it's Chris Cuomo, it's Tucker Carlson talking about Architecture that is stifling and killing to the human spirit versus architecture that uplifts the human spirit. | ||
| And Chris Cuomo has no idea what he's talking about. | ||
| He's just like, what? | ||
| What do you mean concrete blocks don't uplift the human spirit? | ||
| Like, he can't understand it. | ||
| And Doug Carlson just goes off about brutalism and postmodernism. | ||
| And again, we're at this juncture, just to relay back to everything that we're talking about. | ||
| Where you go, okay, are they just accidentally making terribly ugly buildings? | ||
| You think they don't know they're ugly? | ||
| You think they don't know they're oppressive? | ||
| I mean, you gotta understand, so much of the, you know, taste, the style, the trends in things like architecture are not the... | ||
| Casual or natural development of human taste over time. | ||
| They're deliberately programmed. | ||
| My wife went to architecture school and I watched it the whole time. | ||
| If you make something that's beautiful and ornate, they fail you. | ||
| They have like this philosophy of totalitarianism almost, where it's like, You aren't supposed to have flourishes. | ||
| You aren't supposed to have things that are unnecessary for, you know, strict functionality. | ||
| And so you end up with ugly, plain, boring, soulless, meaningless, cultureless, deracinated, bastardized architecture that crushes the human spirit. | ||
| Now, if you're, you know, somebody subjected to normalcy bias and somebody who just... | ||
| Thinks things happen and nobody controls it. | ||
| And, you know, okay, apparently people think that concrete blocks of beige are really cool. | ||
| But if you actually understand how these things are coordinated from the top, how the people who are into this sort of stuff, write books about it and papers about it, and apply psychological... | ||
| You know, scientific interpretation to the effects that their products are having. | ||
| You know it's done on purpose by design to crush the human spirit. | ||
| Ivan made this point on the Alex Jones show the other day when we were doing the Knights of the InfoWars roundtable with Chase and Owen. | ||
| I was talking about the fact that I saw this image of a cubicle, one of those typical beige cubicles that was all dressed up and decorated to look like a really cozy hunter cabin. | ||
| I don't know if the other guys got it. | ||
| I don't know if Chase and Owen sort of got what I was saying. | ||
| They were like, oh, so you'll live in the box as long as the box is nice-looking kind of thing. | ||
| But what I was trying to express was the idea that Somebody chose the beige color. | ||
| Somebody chose the fluorescent lights. | ||
| Somebody chose the gray surroundings. | ||
| It doesn't have to be gray. | ||
| It doesn't have to be deathly and soulless. | ||
| Just because it's small doesn't mean it's bad. | ||
| Just because it's cozy doesn't mean it has to be soulless and soul-destroying. | ||
| Why don't they make cubicles that at least look like they're made of wood? | ||
| Why don't they, you know, paint the walls in something other than either, and sort of the options we have now are just like beige or gray, just like, just nothingness. | ||
| Yeah, just the backroom style look of things. | ||
| Or it'll be like, no, we colored it up, and you just have those horrific corporate pictures of just people playing ball, and they all look misshapen and weird, but they're colorful, and it's just like, ugh, what is this? | ||
| Why not actual beauty? | ||
| Why not things like what we used to build back when all we had was hammers and chisels and could create Notre Dame in the 1200s? | ||
| Where did that go? | ||
| Why did it go away? | ||
| Who made that decision? | ||
| And for what reason? Again, if you don't ask those questions, then you're just a fish being swept along in this stream of other people's design. | ||
| Anyway, guys, you can cut out, if you go to around 41 minutes, you'll find the Tucker rant, and I would love to play that a little bit later in the show, because it goes into basically everything that we talk about here. | ||
| The soul-crushing, on-purpose aspect of modern culture. | ||
| But we're going to move on now. | ||
| And I have so many videos, and this is the constant struggle that I deal with. | ||
| Do I get into what's been revealed about January 6th? | ||
| Do I get into what I know a lot of people today are going to be talking about? | ||
| The January 6th testimony that completely destroys the credibility, if there ever was any, of the January 6th committee? | ||
| Or do I get into the space lasers? | ||
| This is the Infowars decision that I have to make on a daily basis. | ||
| Do I get into the hot topic political discussion? | ||
| Or do I talk about the space lasers? | ||
| I'm going to talk about the space lasers. | ||
| And we'll get into the January 6th stuff in a little bit. | ||
| But I found this video. | ||
| And it's... | ||
| We'll just go to it. | ||
| It's clip number 8. I mean, it's just one of these things. | ||
| When the Maui fires happened, people were talking about lasers. | ||
| Of course, there'd been a laser attack on, or the laser spotting on Hawaii months before. | ||
| And I can understand if you think it's ridiculous to blame a wildfire on space lasers. | ||
| If the reason you think that is because you think that there's no way that our government would do this, or the Chinese government would do this, if you think that It's just an unnecessary explanation for what can be explained naturally. | ||
| I can understand why you would sort of dismiss this idea. | ||
| But the confusing and sort of frustrating part about it is people dismiss that idea because they didn't believe lasers were real. | ||
| This is the craziest thing. | ||
| So I showed you after the Maui fires, I went through and found... | ||
| Because all you have to do is search. | ||
| All you have to do is go to YouTube and type space laser weapons or DOD lasers. | ||
| And you can find official government channels that are like, here's our playlist about our massive array of laser weapons. | ||
| And they're just talking about it. | ||
| And there's presentations about it. | ||
| Internal presentations, external presentations, industry events where they're putting on presentations. | ||
| This is a thing. It's real. | ||
| I don't know what to tell you. | ||
| This is the type of thing that makes you feel crazy when you're like, yeah, you know, like laser weapons. | ||
| And people are like, you think that there are laser weapons? | ||
| It's just like, no, there are. | ||
| So I don't know how to express that to you if you just don't believe me. | ||
| Fine, but why? | ||
| This is just real. | ||
| I don't know what else to tell you. When you have the director of the CIA getting up and giving a speech where he's like, yeah, it's called strategic aerosol injections and it's where we fly planes and shoot gas out of the back of the plane. | ||
| You're like, oh, that sounds like Kim Trails. | ||
| We're like, Kim Trails? That's ridiculous. | ||
| I don't know what to tell you. These things are real. | ||
| This technology is real. | ||
| You can debate whether or not it's being deployed. | ||
| I think that's a valid argument to have, and I tend to land on the side of, yeah, they're being deployed. | ||
| Why else would you make them? | ||
| But you can't say these things don't exist. | ||
| You're the one that looks ridiculous, not us, for knowing about what actually is out there. | ||
| So let's go now to clip number eight. | ||
| It's a space laser weapon called Dragonfire. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This newly released footage shows the Dragonfire laser-directed energy weapon system in action, and it could be in the hands of military personnel in five years' time. | |
| It destroys targets with an intense beam of light and has pinpoint accuracy. | ||
| It's able to hit something the size of a £1 coin from a kilometre away. | ||
| So we've been talking about the cost of firing a laser weapon to be £10 a shot. | ||
| And really, all we're talking about is the cost of the energy that you need to fire the laser weapon, obviously once you've got the system in place in the first place. | ||
| And that compares very favorably with missiles, which might be thousands or tens of thousands or even more per single shot. | ||
| Scientists say Dragonfire proved itself in testing in Scotland and has the potential to transform the UK's defence capability. | ||
| It could be used on land or sea and would remove the reliance on high-cost ammunition. | ||
| Drones are a really good example of the kinds of targets that a laser weapon would be very effective against. | ||
| And certainly in our demonstrations, drones are one of the targets that we've successfully engaged on a number of occasions at really useful ranges. | ||
| Britain isn't alone in developing this technology. | ||
| Militaries around the world see the advantage, like Israel, which has iron beam, designed to destroy short-range objects too close for the iron dome system. | ||
| We don't like to compare Dragonfire too specifically with what's being done in other countries because they have their own research programs which we're not privy to. | ||
| But what I would note is that the Dragonfire technology that we've designed is UK bespoke technology which is owned by us and can be used by us in support of generating laser weapons for our own platforms in future. | ||
| Dragonfire is now back from Scotland and will potentially be involved in further trials. | ||
| Claire Sadler, Forces News. | ||
| So this is the reality. | ||
| If you talk to a normal person, you go, are there such things as space lasers? | ||
| Do you think there are lasers? Do you think there are laser weapons that are being deployed, by the way, if we're seeing it on the news? | ||
| It's been around for 10 years, okay? | ||
| That's how secret technology operates. | ||
| But normal people will be like, space lasers? | ||
| Yeah, right, dude. Meanwhile, you talk to the people that actually know about this, they're so far beyond the conversation, they're making the argument about cost. | ||
| They're like, no, it's cheaper to use lasers than missiles. | ||
| It's like, okay, the people that actually know... | ||
| It's not even a debate. | ||
| It's not a discussion. It's already just an established fact these things exist. | ||
| They're being put into operation. | ||
| It's devolved down to the minutia of just like, is it worth the investment? | ||
| That's where the people in the know are. | ||
| That's where when billionaires get together, this is the type of stuff they're talking about. | ||
| They just don't like you talking about it or knowing about it or being aware of it. | ||
| So let's put that to rest. | ||
| Just remember... Jewish space lasers, a terrible anti-Semitic baseless conspiracy theory. | ||
| Orbital-based Israeli direct energy weapons, very real. | ||
| Very real, and probably an operation. | ||
| Just depends on how you phrase it, I guess. | ||
| Anyway, we will move on to the political news here. | ||
| From the Gateway Pundit. You know what also blew up those claims? | ||
| Basic logic and understanding of human behavior. | ||
| What blew up those claims is that they were ridiculous on their face. | ||
| So, good, we have confirmation now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But this is... | |
| Should not be, I should say, this should not be unexpected to anybody. | ||
| House Republicans on Monday released a report that blew up Liz Cheney's January 6th star witness Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony on Trump's actions on January 6th. | ||
| Quote, none of the White House employees corroborated Hutchinson's sensational story about President Trump lunging for the steering wheel of the beast. | ||
| However, some witnesses did describe the president's mood after the speech at the Ellipse. | ||
| The report said the driver of Trump's motorcade called the beast refuted Cassidy Hutchinson's under oath claims that Trump grabbed the steering wheel and physically assaulted a Secret Service agent. | ||
| The driver testified that he specifically refuted the version of events, as recounted by Hutchinson. | ||
| The driver of the SUV testified he did not see him reach, redacted. | ||
| President Trump never grabbed the steering wheel. | ||
| I didn't see him, you know, lunge and try to get to the front seat at all. | ||
| Yeah, duh. | ||
| What a ridiculous... | ||
| Yeah, I didn't see him do backflips. | ||
| I didn't see him... | ||
| He didn't, you know, throw yogurt at his Secret Service agents. | ||
| No, he didn't do anything ridiculous, nonsensical, stupid, or out of character, obviously. | ||
| But they pretended that he did. | ||
| And they don't care. | ||
| They got the news story. | ||
| They got the headlines. They ran with it. | ||
| It contributed to the ever-growing pile of baseless canards that they... | ||
| Are piling on to Donald Trump. | ||
| It just became another data point to reinforce the false vision they have of an out of control, chaotic, madman, literally behind the wheel trying to crash the car to stage an insurrection. | ||
| It doesn't matter to them. | ||
| You think this is going to knock that out of place? | ||
| Like you would think that if they're building a structure, the view, their view of Trump as being a Russian agent, that's the leg there. | ||
| And then he, you know, is a criminal, you know, blackmailer, you know, whatever claims they make about him. | ||
| You would think this is all like being put together like tinker toys, building up a structure of who Trump is. | ||
| And if you take one of those out, maybe the whole structure starts to fall. | ||
| And then you take another one out and the whole thing collapses and the people go, wow, wow. | ||
| My view of Trump was built on all of these data points. | ||
| If all of the data points are refuted, my vision of Trump is wrong. | ||
| That doesn't happen. That's not the way this works. | ||
| Psychologically, the way they're building this construct is by implanting these ideas that remain there forever, even when refuted by the very source that made the claim in the first place. | ||
| It doesn't matter because the perception... | ||
| The perception is resolute. | ||
| Because just like when you hear me talking at the end of this segment, you're not going to remember exactly what I said. | ||
| You're not going to remember word for word the sentences that I spoke. | ||
| Instead, you're going to just have a general idea of what I said. | ||
| You're going to come away not with the exact points of what I said about laser beams. | ||
| You're going to remember, oh yeah, you did a segment about laser beams being real and... | ||
| You know, how they're probably deployed right now. | ||
| You come away with an idea, a concept, a vague notion of what the data told you, and that remains even when the data is destroyed, as in this case. | ||
| But the real important thing to understand about this is, one, she lied under oath. | ||
| That was a lie. | ||
| She said she saw something that she did not see. | ||
| That is a lie unless you can prove insanity, unless she's literally schizophrenic in seeing things or on acid and misinterpreting things because she's drugged out of her mind. | ||
| If she is sober and competent, that is a lie. | ||
| Under oath, she should be punished for that. | ||
| But in addition to being punished for that, the people that put her up to it should be held to account because they either knew, knowingly, willfully participated in this deception under oath, or they allowed it to happen specifically because it was a show trial. | ||
| Under any trial, under any normal circumstance, the way that our justice system is set up, kind of perfect, kind of exactly how it should be, kind of exactly... | ||
| The system you would create if absent all pre-established understanding of the justice system, if I just sat you down and said, okay, if we want to get to the truth, if we want to have a justice system where we litigate and adjudicate breaking of the law and illegal activity, and even if you didn't understand, if you're just a good person, especially one raised in a Christian culture like America— We would come up with basically the system that we have now. | ||
| Maybe a few tweaks, but in general, if I were to ask you, should you be able to know about charges that you're being tried for? | ||
| Should you be allowed, to reverse the question, should a court be allowed to try and convict you without you even knowing about it? | ||
| I think it would be pretty obvious you would go, no? | ||
| I don't want some court deciding things about me and I don't even have a say or I'm not even aware of it. | ||
| Okay, so we have a system where you have to make public and you have to make known to the person being charged with something. | ||
| You have to let them know the charges so that they can prepare a defense. | ||
| That would be the other question, right? Do you think that to get to the truth and to get to ultimate justice, the person being tried should be allowed to speak on their behalf? | ||
| Should they be allowed to mount a defense against the accusations? | ||
| I would think the answer would be yes, because I would think you'd be able to think, okay, what if I'm brought up on charges that are false? | ||
| I would want to be able to defend myself. | ||
| Yes, we should give people a chance to defend themselves. | ||
| Should they have to defend themselves in their own words? | ||
| What if somebody is like not that eloquent, not that good at making a case, but they are innocent, they can be convicted just because they don't have the skills necessary to get acquittal. | ||
| Should they be allowed to have a spokesperson speak for them, a lawyer? | ||
| Yes, of course. So, like, again, if you just go with human nature and what is good and right, you would basically rebuild our justice system as we have it. | ||
| Make it public. Everything has to be done out in the open. | ||
| People can have lawyers represent them. | ||
| The defense gets all the time they need to argue against the prosecution who the burden is placed on. | ||
| They have to prove you're guilty, not just prove that they think you're guilty or get you to go along with that society would be better if you were guilty. | ||
| That's not how it works. | ||
| So our justice system is made for a reason. | ||
| Now, when you hold something that looks like a trial, that's billed as a trial, that has witnesses coming up and testifying like a trial, but has all the trappings of a trial, but it's missing those crucial elements of things like a defendant actually in the courtroom, | ||
| that the person being accused of things be given a platform and a time to respond to those accusations— If you have all of the appearance of a trial but none of the actual contingent elements of a trial it's a show trial. | ||
| That's what we witnessed. | ||
| With the January 6th committee, that should be a crime. | ||
| Our government should not be allowed to hold a faux show trial against defendants that aren't there without not being given an ability to defend themselves, not able to present contrary evidence to the evidence being presented by the prosecution. | ||
| It is so obviously wrong. | ||
| It is so obviously manipulative and detrimental to the entire basis of our country. | ||
| And if they aren't stopped, they're just going to do it again. | ||
| Whatever next event happens, why wouldn't they do it again? | ||
| I mean, Donald Trump was a private citizen at the time that that was taking place. | ||
| Even though they were seeding narratives that would be used in actual legitimate So-called, at least, functionally legitimate trials. | ||
| They were allowed to present this against a private citizen without allowing the private citizen to be there, without actually filing charges. | ||
| That's another part of it. | ||
| You can't just prosecute somebody on an idea, on a vague thought that they may have done something potentially wrong. | ||
| No, you have to have charges. You have to be confident that you can prove they violated a specific law. | ||
| All of these things are in place for a reason. | ||
| They do away with that. | ||
| They hold a show trial where they present only one side, where only one side gets to call witnesses, and where the witnesses that would contradict those are silenced, not allowed to present their evidence, and what you end up with is fake evidence under oath. | ||
| Even taking the oath is a part of the show trial. | ||
| You don't have to take an oath if you're not in trial or testifying. | ||
| In front of a legitimate body. | ||
| But they did take an oath. | ||
| She did. Cassidy Hudson did take an oath. | ||
| She lied about what she said she saw. | ||
| Where are the charges for contempt of Congress or perjury or any other law that has been violated here? | ||
| And why are the people that helped to carry out this show trial allowed to get away with it? | ||
| This is from Infowars.com. | ||
| Liz Cheney and January 6th committee suppressed exonerating evidence of Trump's push for National Guard at Capitol. | ||
| This is another aspect of the January 6th committee where they falsely claimed there was no evidence to support Trump officials' claims that the White House had called for 10,000 National Guard troops ahead of the mass demonstration in D.C. against the rigged 2020 election, but a transcribed interview from January 2020 Two, | ||
| conducted by the committee, has been obtained by the Federalists, that included that very evidence from a key source, a source that was supposed to testify to the January 6th committee, until they realized he would be presenting evidence that was contrary to their narrative, so they stopped him from testifying. | ||
| That's called a show trial. | ||
| That's, in my interpretation, a form of treason against the United States. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. We actually have a couple developments and updates relating to January 6th. | ||
| So let's just lay them all out for you here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's sort of a doozy, folks. | |
| And it always has been, of course. | ||
| And a lot of this is just confirmation of what we already knew instinctually. | ||
| Things like, no, Donald Trump did not try to leap over. | ||
| He's not a three-year-old Tried to leap over the back seat and grab the steering wheel. | ||
| You know, like, what? Yeah, that was nonsense from the beginning. | ||
| Like, you people should be embarrassed you ever gave this any credence at all to ever let this woman get up and tell this ridiculous nonsense story. | ||
| Well, embarrassed should be the least of you. | ||
| You should all be prosecuted for doing this is what I should actually say. | ||
| Let's just lay out what's been learned recently as we just covered. | ||
| The driver of Trump's motorcade refuted Cassidy Hutchinson's under oath claim that Trump grabbed the steering wheel and physically assaulted a Secret Service agent. | ||
| So that was a lie, a blatant, bold-faced, willful lie. | ||
| Not a hallucination, but a lie. | ||
| From InfoWars, Liz Cheney and January 6th Committee suppressed exonerating evidence of Trump's push for National Guard at the Capitol. | ||
| Cheney and the January 6th Committee falsely claimed they had no evidence to support Trump officials' claims. | ||
| The White House called for 10,000 National Guard troops. | ||
| But a transcribed interview from January of 2022 conducted by the committee that's been obtained by the Federalists included that very evidence from a key source. | ||
| The interview which Cheney attended and personally participated in was suppressed from public release until now, Molly Hemingway reported Friday. | ||
|
unidentified
|
day. | |
| you Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato's first transcribed interview with the committee was conducted on January 28, 2022. | ||
| In it, he told Cheney and her investigators that he overheard White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows push D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city. | ||
| He also testified President Trump had suggested 10,000 would be needed to keep the peace at the public rallies and protests scheduled for January 6, 2021. | ||
| ronado described white house frustration with the acting secretary of defense christopher miller's slow deployment of assistance on the afternoon of january 6th 2021 so not only did the committee not accurately characterize this interview they suppressed the transcript from public review They actually got up and said the exact opposite of what they knew to be true. | ||
| So they had the evidence, they had the testimony, they suppressed it. | ||
| They discarded it, and then they got up and said, we have no evidence that any National Guard troops were requested. | ||
| That's a lie from the Trump team. | ||
| Just outrageous, outrageous dishonesty from a body that we're expecting to be dishonest, but really they're setting new records for themselves. | ||
| As Gateway Pundit puts it, new information on Liz Cheney's deceit and perverse actions surrounding events on January 6th raised serious calls for her arrest and prosecution. | ||
| Because it wasn't just Mark Meadows and Ornato. | ||
| It was Kash Patel as well. | ||
| A May 2021 report revealed that Liz Cheney, quote, So not only did they orchestrate the lack of, National Guard there to keep peace in what they knew would be an extremely large protest while Congress was in session right outside of the Capitol. | ||
| But they orchestrated a media campaign to portray his attempt to deploy the National Guard as somehow politicizing the military, which of course they immediately did following January 6th, directing barbed wire, fences, and holding the inauguration in directing barbed wire, fences, and holding the inauguration in a dystopian atmosphere of military lockdown. | ||
| Kash Patel, the former chief of staff to the Secretary of Defense, joined the Epoch Times for an interview on the security planning and protest on January 6th at the U.S. Capitol. | ||
| During his interview, Cash admitted that Mayor Mariel Bowser turned down thousands of National Guard troops at the Capitol on January 6th for political reasons. | ||
| Once again, pure, pure projection. | ||
| Donald Trump wants to have the National Guard there to keep things peaceful. | ||
| They say, actually, you're just politicizing the military. | ||
| We won't allow it. | ||
| It actually turned out to be necessary. | ||
| They were the ones acting on political impetus, not Trump. | ||
| They were the ones who were orchestrating all of this, not Trump. | ||
| They're the ones deceiving everyone and telling you they're saving you from Big Bad Trump, who was doing everything right. | ||
| House GOP, meanwhile, has opened a probe into Democrat J6 panel collusion with the Atlanta prosecutor pursuing Trump. | ||
| Republican congressional investigators have opened an inquiry into the extent of collusion between Democrat House-run January 6th Committee and the Fulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis during her prosecution of Donald Trump. | ||
| She's also been in contact with Kamala Harris, despite claiming she'd had no White House contacts whatsoever. | ||
| All of this has been orchestrated from the top, from the beginning, obviously, which is, again, just... | ||
| The epitome of hypocrisy and irony when you have them charging Trump for supposed collusion, racketeering, RICO case because he made one phone call to the Georgia Secretary of State saying, what the hell is going on there? | ||
| You guys got to get this in order. | ||
| Where are all these votes coming from? | ||
| Where did all the votes go? | ||
| What is happening here? | ||
| Doing so in a... | ||
| Not a public way, but in a way that was not secret or hidden or disguised. | ||
| He just made a phone call because he's the President of the United States, and he's allowed to do that. | ||
| But they call that collusion, while meanwhile, the January 6th Committee and Kamala Harris and their big backers and lawyers are all getting together, coordinating with the person that will charge Trump with collusion. | ||
| I mean, it's so mind-blowingly hypocritical. | ||
| It blows your mind. That's just how it is. | ||
| In a status report released Monday, the House Administration Oversight Subcommittee said that it located a letter in which Willis, in 2021, asked for the House Democrats to send her any evidence that would further her prosecution of Trump. | ||
| The committee said it was concerned that the Democrat-run investigation led by Representatives Benny Thompson and Liz Cheney may have shared evidence such as video deposition with Willis' office while not providing them to the Republicans that took over the House chamber in 2023. | ||
| So again, they're coordinating with and providing evidence from the show trial that they held with the prosecutor that would be charging Trump with collusion. | ||
| Despite them being the ones colluding, it is just that inverted in our world today. | ||
| But elsewhere in the January 6th news stack, we have this. | ||
| DOJ charges January 6th shooter three years later after a protester releases footage. | ||
| I admit, I had not heard of this. | ||
| Currently, there was at least one single weapon in the January 6th protest. | ||
| It was fired into the air from the scaffold here. | ||
| And on Friday, they arrested the man who fired these two shots into the air during January 6, 2021 Capitol Hill uprising. | ||
| But only after footage of the crime was released by a January 6 protester. | ||
| The Justice Department announced Friday the J6 shooter, John Emanuel Banuelos, made his initial court appearance to face charges of trespassing, felony civil disorder and firing a weapon on Capitol grounds. | ||
| Banuelos was identified immediately after January 6, 2021, featured on a vice documentary flashing a handgun. | ||
| The FBI had him on the radar by February 4, 2021, according to charging documents. | ||
| However, footage of him firing the gun was not released until last month by former West Virginia lawmaker and current congressional candidate Derek Evans, who pled guilty to disorderly conduct and trespassing on Capitol grounds in May 2022. | ||
| According to Evan, Ben Welles' gunshots, quote, He contended that Capitol Police began firing tear gas into the crowd right after the gunshots at 2.30 p.m. | ||
| on January 6th. All hell broke loose soon thereafter. | ||
| Other January researchers argued with Evans that the gunshots were fired after the rioting had already begun, which I think is true. | ||
| Either way, Evans said it was highly suspicious the FBI did not arrest Banuelos until after his footage was made public. | ||
| Because the government had video of him shooting the gun on January 6th for over three years. | ||
| But they didn't arrest him until the story broke and got national coverage, likely another Ray Epps situation, Evans said Friday. | ||
| And there may be more evidence than you expect for this, as people found this guy's Twitter account. | ||
| And I'll tell you what his Twitter account said on the other side. | ||
| Would it surprise you to know? | ||
| That he sort of admitted to being a Fed? | ||
| That he actually, in his own words, called himself a Fed? | ||
| Verbatim? Saying, I am a retired Fed? | ||
| Would that strike you as strange? | ||
| the guy who shot a gun and didn't get arrested was a fed welcome back folks supposedly And this just comes from a career account, Ken Silva at JD underscore cashless. | ||
| Apparently this is the guy that was just arrested. | ||
| Apparently he was arrested for stabbing somebody. | ||
| It is a very strange story. | ||
| So this guy shot a gun on January 6th up into the air. | ||
| Footage of it was obtained by the government. | ||
| They've had it for three years, but never arrested the guy until it went public and came a national news story. | ||
| Then the guy stabbed a teenager. | ||
| And when he was arrested, he said, I fired a gun at the Capitol. | ||
| Apparently he's not being charged for the stabbing because they say that was self-defense. | ||
| But now he's being charged for January 6th. | ||
| Despite the fact they had his info for three years and never arrested him before then. | ||
| All very odd. Very odd. | ||
| John Emmanuel Benuelos, a muse on Twitter, asks, is he another Ray Epps? | ||
| Why did the FBI leave him alone for three years despite knowing he was the armed rioter who fired shots at the Capitol? | ||
| Why did the police decline to charge him with murder for killing a teen? | ||
| Very interesting developments, but this Twitter user, Ken Silva, Says, uh, guys, I just looked up the January 6th Shooter's Twitter and he's got some interesting posts. | ||
| One says, who's looking for a good contender with great emotional intelligence that has time to spend with their partner each day because I'm a retired Fed? | ||
| Another one says he's AKA the regulator, AKA the Fed, AKA well-rounded. | ||
| He also says, do you want information from a former Fed? | ||
| Let me know. I'm single, first-generation American, great emotional intelligence, a.k.a. | ||
| street smarts. I quit my job as a Fed, a.k.a. | ||
| equalizer, a.k.a. | ||
| regulator. So he keeps saying he's a Fed or a former Fed. | ||
| And that's an interesting twist to this whole story. | ||
| Were there Feds on January 6th? | ||
| Yes, obviously. He may have been one of them, maybe not. | ||
| We don't know. We just don't know. | ||
| Now we're going to move on to a real conspiracy in just a second. | ||
| A real classic. | ||
| Who's pulling the strings? | ||
| Who's telling the truth? We've been lied to. | ||
| But why and by who sort of conspiracy here in just a second. | ||
| I got to open up the phone lines for your calls. | ||
| Next hour. This has just been too long since I've done that. | ||
| And if I don't open up the phone lines, we'll never hear from you. | ||
| Despite the fact I have so much more news to cover, I'll never get to it in the first place. | ||
| But I'm going to go ahead and give out the number now. | ||
| If you want to call in, we'll take your calls throughout the next hour. | ||
| The number dial 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call here on the American Journal. | ||
| We'll take your calls throughout the next hour. | ||
| Now, You may recall that last week we covered some curious activity of the royal family. | ||
| I talked about the historical cyclical phenomenon of every 100 years another section of European royal houses being utterly destroyed in one way or another. | ||
| Pointing to what's going on with the royals as being extremely suspicious. | ||
| And disturbing in some ways. | ||
| One of them was that Kate Middleton hasn't been seen in a long time. | ||
| Nobody's quite sure where she is. | ||
| Well, I guess they wanted to try to dispel some of the questions about where the potentially future Queen of England, where she's been for a couple months. | ||
| So they released a photo of But that didn't quell anything. | ||
| No, it inspired a whole bunch of other questions because the photo was obviously edited. | ||
| Stories in New York Post. | ||
| Kate Middleton apologizes over doctored family photo, admits she, quote, experiments with editing. | ||
| Hmm. Princess of Wales apologized early Monday for releasing a doctored family photo of her children and her blaming it on amateur editing skills. | ||
| Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing, the princess wrote. | ||
| I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. | ||
| Now here's the photograph itself. | ||
| I remember the first thing I saw of this was somebody saying, you know what you don't do after getting abdominal surgery is wear super tight jeans. | ||
| That was the first sort of suspicious thing about this. | ||
| The pic, which was the first official image released by Kensington Palace since the royal's abdominal surgery in January, showed her smiling alongside Prince George X, Princess Charlotte VIII, and Prince Louis V. The palace said the photo had been taken by Prince William last week. | ||
| The heartwarming snap was meant to put to bed some of the wild speculation swirling around the 42-year-old princess's health. | ||
| But it ended up creating fresh conspiracies that the family was hiding something. | ||
| Well, yeah. Yeah, I guess it would. | ||
| Now, they say this photo was littered with mistakes, either from Photoshop or AI. And it does look like AI may have been used. | ||
| If you guys want to bring up the picture, look at the kid's hand. | ||
| Kid's hand is not in a natural position. | ||
| On the left, the sun. | ||
| Yeah. What is that? | ||
| What is that? He's like missing one finger, his other finger is like twisted around one. | ||
| It's a little weird. | ||
| That's a little confusing. Now I can almost believe this if the editing had been done to like Their faces, right? Maybe they took a bunch of pictures and she's like, oh, I'll go in and pick the best face from each one and put it all in the same one. | ||
| But these changes are like weird. | ||
| They're not things that you would typically expect from just a mother editing a family photo. | ||
| It's things like her wedding ring is missing. | ||
| There's flowers on the trees that shouldn't be there this early in the year. | ||
| Part of the daughter's wrist is missing. | ||
| It's very strange. | ||
| It's very strange. | ||
| So, I guess the question is, where's Kate Middleton? | ||
| And what have they done with her? | ||
| That's just one of the questions I think that would be worth asking. | ||
| Yeah, it's just one of those things. | ||
| So she, I guess, had surgery in January. | ||
| Hasn't been seen since. | ||
| They're like, yeah, you know, people are asking questions. | ||
| Let's release a picture. | ||
| And then the picture they release is massively edited. | ||
| And all of the media outlets, once they realize that, have to put out warnings like this saying, please remove this image from your systems. | ||
| It's been edited. And she's like, oh, I did that. | ||
| I don't believe that either. | ||
| I think if there's one thing that the royal family does not do themselves and in fact has massive armies of people in charge of, it's their public image. | ||
| It's their relations with the media. | ||
| It's the creation of things like photos and videos for public consumption. | ||
| I don't believe Kate Middleton is sitting there on her MacBook experimenting with Photoshop and then releasing that image to news outlets. | ||
| I don't believe that. | ||
| I don't believe that. So that's weird. | ||
| It's just very weird. | ||
| Again, I guess the conspiracy is why would they do this? | ||
| Who did it? | ||
| Where is Kate Middleton for real? | ||
| Why has she not made an appearance? | ||
| Like, it's weird when there's all these questions about where you are, if you're safe, if you're even alive, and you can't provide proof. | ||
| You can't just, I mean, she probably does have a cell phone. | ||
| She probably could fire up a selfie. | ||
| You go, hey guys, I'm alright, just recovering from my abdominal thing. | ||
| Happy Mother's Day, click. | ||
| Like, that would be it. And that would solve a lot of questions. | ||
| Instead, they put a doctored photo up, which only reemphasizes the weirdness of all the things going on with the royal family right now. | ||
| Getting cancer, getting surgery all at once, going away, and now releasing photoshopped images. | ||
| Whose purpose for being released was to try to say, see, everything's normal and fine, actually. | ||
| You crazy conspiracy theorists think that there's something untoward going on? | ||
| You think that there's something suspicious happening? | ||
| No way. Look at this beautiful photo. | ||
| Like the photo that's clearly manipulated and edited? | ||
| What's happening? What's going on here? | ||
| Where are the royal family? | ||
| What have you done with her? They're like, we could just kill her in a car crash, but no, we used that one already. | ||
| Dang it! We used up our car crash card. | ||
| We'll just pretend she's fine. | ||
| I don't know. It's weird. | ||
| It's very weird. Yeah. | ||
| Well, actually, look, I'm no expert on the Russian economy. | ||
| I can only tell you what I saw, which is a city of 13 million people, much larger than any city we have. | ||
| Hard to govern a city like that. | ||
| And there is, you know, no homelessness, no graffiti. | ||
| It's spotlessly clean. | ||
| The public spaces are beautiful. | ||
| The architecture has not been degraded by postmodern, the oppression of postmodern architecture, which is designed to demoralize and hurt you and destroy your spirit. | ||
| I believe that because it's true. | ||
| Do you believe that postmodern architecture is designed to kill your spirit? | ||
| Of course. Why? | ||
| What's the message of it? Well, look, anything that we make with our hands... | ||
| It's the purest expression of our creativity. | ||
| So there's a purpose behind everything that we make. | ||
| There's a message behind all of it, as there is in all art. | ||
| You don't paint a painting with no vision behind it. | ||
| You paint a painting because you're saying something. | ||
| And so buildings that are warm and human and that elevate the human spirit are pro-human. | ||
| And brutalism, for example, or the IMPE glass boxes that crowd every city in the United States, those are not elevating. | ||
| What's the message of working in a cube in a room with a synthetic drop ceiling and drywall on the walls and fluorescent lighting ahead of you and no privacy at all? | ||
| What's the message? The message is really clear. | ||
| You mean nothing. | ||
| You are replaceable. | ||
| You are a widget in a bin awaiting assembly. | ||
| You're just a cog in a machine. | ||
| You have no value. | ||
| And everyone kind of ignores this, like, oh, well, that's the way buildings have always been. | ||
| No, that's not true. And architecture and anything made by human hands is the purest expression of the society that produced it. | ||
| So we were like, oh, they're handicrafts. | ||
| No, they're not handicrafts. | ||
| They're a visible and tangible sign of who you are, not just as a person, but corporately as a society. | ||
| And if you live in a place that creates nothing beautiful, And doesn't provide people uplifting buildings to live and work in? | ||
| That's a very sick and dark society. | ||
| And it wasn't always that way. That's the only point I made. | ||
| Look, Moscow, I'm not moving to Moscow. | ||
| I'm an American. I'm never leaving. | ||
| But Moscow is not so different from the cities of the United States in my youth. | ||
| We had a free society, much freer than we have today. | ||
| We had much more capitalism, free markets, free monopolies. | ||
| But you're not saying Moscow was a free society. | ||
| I'm saying the United States was a free society. | ||
| Okay. The country that I grew up in had a semi-functioning capitalist system with competition. | ||
| It wasn't all four companies dominating everything, which is what we have now. | ||
| That's not capitalism. That's a monopoly economy, which is bad. | ||
| And you had freedom of speech. | ||
| I guess there are probably some limits, but I wasn't aware of what they were because they were so broad. | ||
| And you had... | ||
| It's safe, for the most part, clean cities. | ||
| And that's exactly what Moscow is. | ||
| Again, as I've said, and I really mean it, and I said it to our producers who we were traveling with at the time, this does not make me love Putin. | ||
| It makes me despise our leaders. | ||
| And so I say this for Moscow, and Jon Stewart is just such a tool of power. | ||
| It's crazy. He's like, well, you know, fentanyl ODs are the price of freedom. | ||
| Really? You're going to try and convince me of that? | ||
| It's like telling women working at Citibank is liberation. | ||
| No, it's slavery, actually. That's not liberation. | ||
| Getting to raise your own children is liberation. | ||
| Getting to do what you want to satisfy the deepest desires of your heart, that's liberation. | ||
| They've redefined liberation. | ||
| Liberation is living in some shithole? | ||
| No. That's slavery. | ||
| And so I try to make this point. | ||
| I don't think it's super subtle or esoteric or complex, but they're like, oh, Putin? | ||
| No, no, no, no, no. You are flacking for the indefensible. | ||
| That's what's actually happening here. | ||
| So for you, it's not Putin's better, Russia's better. | ||
| It's that it gave you perspective on what you think has changed in America for the worse. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Of course! It's not how it came across. | |
| Well, I'm sure it was at least in part due to my inability to explain it fully, which has been a problem all my life. | ||
| It's incumbent on me to explain things. | ||
| That's my job. And I don't always succeed. | ||
| So I'm willing to believe that. | ||
| But it's also a product of intentional distortion of what I'm saying. | ||
| Which is, this is an indictment of our leadership class, which deserves to be indicted and imprisoned, in my opinion. | ||
| And I mean that. | ||
| All my views are that. All my views are through an American lens. | ||
| I've got a big family. I'm not leaving. | ||
| My family's been here for hundreds of years. | ||
| I'm not going anywhere. I'm the most American person you've ever met. | ||
| Don't have another passport, unlike a lot of other people. | ||
| And so I'm stuck here by choice and circumstance, and I want my country to be as great as it can possibly be. | ||
| All right, folks, we got some interesting callers coming up. | ||
| Very interesting indeed. | ||
| And you know, since it is the title of the show today, I do have an update. | ||
| Some information about the Andrew Tate, Tristan Tate event. | ||
| It's happening. Candace Owens just posted this. | ||
| Saying, I do not care what you think about Andrew and Tristan Tate. | ||
| Everything that's happening to them is an absurdity. | ||
| So this was a civil case from accusations made 10 years ago that were declined criminal prosecution by the UK courts, but then crowdfunded into a civil persecution, giving E. Jean Carroll vibes, The woman who sued Trump. | ||
| That any civil case would constitute a middle-of-the-night detainment in a foreign country is beyond absurd. | ||
| It's criminal corruption. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Interesting. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| censored men responds. | ||
| The women also had to raise money for their legal team, which is odd. | ||
| I'm sure the lawyers would work as a contingency plan if their case was solid. | ||
| Even the woman's lawyers don't have faith in the case. | ||
| So it does appear as though. | ||
| This stuff that they've been arrested on last night in Romania, it's a civil case from the UK that was already presented as a criminal case and denied prosecution but has now got new life in the civil arena. | ||
| So that would be, in my estimation, an abuse of the system. | ||
| We're getting even more interesting calls here. | ||
| We're going to go out to Tim in Seattle in just a second. | ||
| He wants to talk about DEI and airplanes. | ||
| So before we do that, let me touch on the latest near disasters or air disasters that have occurred. | ||
| Of course, we've been covering it up until now. | ||
| Wheels falling off. | ||
| Doors flying open. | ||
| Planes just tipping right over as they go off the runway. | ||
| Just... Not confidence-inducing activity by the airline industry. | ||
| We have some stories about this and, of course, the supposed suicide of a Boeing whistleblower when he was expected to be giving testimony but never showed up for a The event and was found dead in his car. | ||
| Before we get to that, here's the latest disasters or near to disasters. | ||
| 50 people injured by strong movement on Boeing plane flying from Australia to New Zealand. | ||
| LATAM Airlines said there was a technical event during the flight which caused a strong movement. | ||
| That would be not turbulence, but some sort of technical event. | ||
| The Boeing 7879 Dreamliner dipped so dramatically into a nosedive for a couple of seconds during a flight to New Zealand, causing passengers to slam into the roof of the cabin, witnesses say. | ||
| Latim Airlines says the plane traveling from Sydney, Australia, experienced a technical event during the flight, which caused strong movement. | ||
| Paramedics had more than 10 emergency vehicles waiting for passengers when the LA-800 landed in Auckland. | ||
| 30 people hit the ceiling hard. | ||
| Just... Okay. | ||
| Crazy. Crazy event. | ||
| Meanwhile, a United flight bound for SFO turns around mid-flight due to mechanical issue. | ||
| Investigations underway for another United Airlines jet bound for SFO. Had to be turned around mid-flight because of a mechanical issue. | ||
| Just 10 seconds after the flight, after flight 830 from Sydney to San Francisco took the air. | ||
| Video by Planespotter New York Aviation got clear images of fluid spewing from the plane. | ||
| It looked like it was coming from the right landing gear. | ||
| We actually have that video, clip 13. | ||
| This was originally published by San Francisco Gate, but then was removed for some reason. | ||
| But we do have the video, clip 13, here. | ||
| I guess you can see liquid coming from the rear landing gate. | ||
| I wasn't actually able to identify it when I was watching it. | ||
| That is apparently on display there. | ||
| I can't see it personally, but maybe I don't know what I'm looking for. | ||
| Or maybe that... Okay, yeah, I see it there. | ||
| Alright, yeah, I definitely see it there. | ||
| Okay, yes, it is definitely there. | ||
| So that's a little bit disturbing. | ||
| It landed back at the airport in Sydney with no injuries, but lots of questions. | ||
| Again, this plane randomly nosediving out of nowhere for 30 seconds. | ||
| That's disturbing. Then you have this story at InfoWars. | ||
| Pilots fell asleep mid-flight with 157 people on board. | ||
| But hey, I mean, people fall asleep sometimes. | ||
| I mean, you know, it happens. | ||
| You can't blame them for that. | ||
| The plane veered off its designated course during the 28 minutes that both the pilot and co-pilot were asleep. | ||
| According to the report. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Excuse me. Sorry, don't laugh. | |
| Don't laugh. It's just... | ||
| I guess they're both Indonesians. | ||
| This was an Indonesian flight from Kindari to Jakarta. | ||
| And they decided to take a little nap. | ||
| A little nappy nap in the cockpit. | ||
| Folks, if you're going to be taking a nap, just make sure to coordinate with your co-pilot when each one of you gets to... | ||
| It's to take a nap. | ||
| Then we have this. | ||
| Maybe the source and font of all of these problems. | ||
| FAA audit of Boeing 737 production found mechanics using hotel card and dish soap as makeshift tools. | ||
| Crazy. The FAA found dozens of issues throughout Boeing's 737 max jet production process and Including mechanics at one of its key suppliers using a hotel card key and dish soap as makeshift tools to test compliance. | ||
| They discovered, quote, unacceptable quality control issues during an audit of Boeing and supplier Spirit Aerosystems that was launched after that door plug flew off a 737 MAX 9 at 16,000 feet. | ||
| There were dozens of issues found throughout the manufacturing process. | ||
| By design, on purpose, they don't want you flying. | ||
| They're actually making it purposefully impossible for you to fly. | ||
| They've announced this. The C40 Cities Agreement says you could take one long-haul flight, well, short-haul flight, I correct myself, one short-haul flight every three years. | ||
| And if they can't convince you to do that willingly, then they'll make it unsafe for you to do it at all. | ||
| And with that, we go out to Tim in Seattle. | ||
| We want to talk about DEI and airplanes. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. Tim, you're on the air. | ||
| Hey, how's it going, Harrison? How's my audio? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm on a public bus right now, but I wanted to talk about Fukushima. | |
| And what happened after Fukushima was that it saturated the air column throughout the world, and it's bombarding all of the aircraft that have been flying through these plumes. | ||
| And what radiation does is it causes metal fatigue. | ||
| It causes parts to fail. | ||
| And I think that that's the bigger thing. | ||
| I posted it on my Twitter. | ||
| The biggest boil-down explanation, it's a documentary by Radchick, or her name is actually Christina Consolo. | ||
| It was posted three days ago. | ||
| It's from 13 years ago because we've been doing this research ever since it started. | ||
| So, it's unfortunate. | ||
| I mean, again, it's comical that we're able to point the finger at the other. | ||
| It's DEI. But what if it's something so much more severe that they're using DEI as a scapegoat to actually dismiss the effects of Wigner and the radiation eating away the aircraft? | ||
| Interesting. Yeah, I hadn't heard that. | ||
| Sorry, your audio is a little bit low quality today, so I'm going to let you go. | ||
| But I hadn't heard that, and... | ||
| I will certainly look into it. | ||
| I think definitely it could be a number of different effects. | ||
| I think DEI is having a massive effect. | ||
| I had not looked into or heard about the Wigner effect. | ||
| I'll look into that because that is very interesting and yet another fallout, no pun intended, from the Fukushima disaster. | ||
| Fascinating stuff and I'll have to look into that. | ||
| And see what I think about it. | ||
| Thank you for the call, Tim. | ||
| Let's go to Roy in Florida. | ||
| Roy, you've called in about BlackRock. | ||
| Go ahead, Roy, you're on the air. Hey, how you doing? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good, thanks. So, I work in the medical field, and we have this ability to Go into online on the computer there while we're at work and check out our retirement funding. | |
| And, well, I noticed at one point that they had sent me a notice, but I didn't see it until a little late. | ||
| They had just went ahead and transferred all of my retirement into a BlackRock fund for me. | ||
| And before I noticed that they had done that without my permission, I had already lost thousands of dollars. | ||
| And, you know, I called him up. | ||
| I told the lady, I said, why would you transfer me into a fund for me? | ||
| I didn't opt to do this. | ||
| And so I had to click it back into a preservation fund. | ||
| But here's the real problem for all the medical field is all the funds that they give you access to that are one-click option, like with a box where you click. | ||
| It's all BlackRock. | ||
| So almost everything that I can just one click on to easily get into, which is what most people are going to do because, you know, most people in the medical field They just don't have a clue how to invest their retirement or how to invest their money. | ||
| Right. You don't want to be messing with your retirement fund. | ||
| I mean, it's the type of thing where if you're not an expert, you tend to want to just trust the experts and go, hey, whatever you guys think is right, I don't want to risk my retirement on something I don't know a lot about. | ||
| So yeah, they make it very easy to just click the checkbox and choose what they want you to choose. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, and it's very complicated if you want anything other than that. | |
| But I just thought that that was kind of messed up, that almost all of the funds that you could one-click into were owned by BlackRock in some fashion or another. | ||
| Well, and this is the problem, and this is what we talked about when people first started learning about things like ESG. And I think it was during the Budweiser boycott or something, where you go, you understand boycotts don't really work anymore because... | ||
| And they can, obviously. | ||
| Bud Light was one where it did have an effect. | ||
| But for the most part, these corporations are more reliant on investor income than actual customers coming in the store. | ||
| So if they... You know, put trans clothes in the kids section and they lose a couple billion dollars from conservatives boycotting. | ||
| Well, they did that to raise their ESG score, meaning that whatever they lost in customers is being made up and then some in BlackRock Investment, which is just that customer's money, but in the retirement fund. | ||
| They have your money. | ||
| They have all of your retirement funds over decades at their disposal, and they're using it Deliberately to give to companies who oppose your morality and view of the world in an inverted sort of way. | ||
| So you're definitely not the only one, but that's a very good piece of advice for people to go look and see if your retirement fund is a part of this and if possible, if you can take your money out and at least not We're good to go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And so, you know, by the time I figured out that all my money was transferred over into this BlackRock fund, I'd lost thousands of dollars. | |
| So it was disheartening because I would not support BlackRock because of everything I've learned about this company from watching Infowars. | ||
| Well, good looking out and staying on top of things and not just, you know, being ignorant to where your money is going and what's being spent on. | ||
| Thank you for the call, Roy, and hopefully good advice for people to take and look at their own funds that they may think are safe, but apparently they can just put it in BlackRock without telling you. | ||
| Pretty disturbing stuff. | ||
| We've got a couple callers. Thank you for the call, Roy. | ||
| We've got a couple callers calling in about this Boeing flight. | ||
| Let's go to Tim in California first on line four. | ||
| This is the One that injured nearly 50 people as they apparently took a random and sudden nosedive for about 30 seconds. | ||
| Horrifying stuff. Tim in California, what do you know about this? | ||
| You know, that Latim Airlines 787-9 jet that had that happen, you know, it's now coming out that once they got on the ground, the pilot was talking to people and he was all shook up. | ||
| And so now whatever he talked about, they're putting out on social media. | ||
| And he's saying that basically all the screens went black all at the same time and none of the flight surfaces worked at all. | ||
| He was just basically riding a tube through space and just he was on the same ride they were on. | ||
| nothing he could do, and that suddenly it all came back on again? | ||
| And so, okay, we'll just act like nothing happened in land. | ||
| And, of course, he knew people might have got hurt, but just, hey, he brought her down and we all got down a lot. | ||
| But, I mean, it's like one of those things where are you ever going to fly again after that? | ||
| Even the pilot, you know, it's like, am I ever going to fly, you know? | ||
| And you just wonder about stuff like that. | ||
| It's like, you know, has that kind of stuff ever happened before? | ||
| Like, have we ever had events where suddenly airliners were taken over before like that? | ||
| That's a great question, and I do remember I saw somebody say that. | ||
| How about an F-35 ejection? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was bad weather. | |
| It was bad weather. That's what it was. | ||
| No, it is completely insane. | ||
| And yeah, the pilot of a terrifying flight from Australia to New Zealand told those on board he temporarily lost control of his 787, After one of its instruments failed, the passenger said Monday, as authorities investigate what caused the sudden drop that threw travelers around the cabin, injuring dozens. | ||
| And I'd heard that same quote that you just said there, where you basically said there was nothing. | ||
| Everything just went black. | ||
| We started dropping. | ||
| I mean, that is totally terrifying. | ||
| And actually, so it looks like maybe he's been interviewed. | ||
| The story from CNN says... | ||
| Okay, I'm sorry. | ||
| This is... This is a passenger describing this. | ||
| Okay. I thought they were quoting the pilot. | ||
| So when I opened my eyes, there were various individuals at the top of the plane just stuck to the roof and then they fell to the floor. | ||
| Then I realized I'm not in the movie. | ||
| I immediately engaged with the pilot and said, what was that? | ||
| And he openly admitted, he said, I lost control of the plane. | ||
| My gauges just kind of went blank on me. | ||
| Poof. He said for that brief moment... | ||
| Imagine like... Yeah. Yeah. | ||
| Imagine being at a 100,000 watt rock concert right in the middle of a total thrashing metal song and just boop! | ||
| The lights go out. The sound goes out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Everything just stops. You know. | |
| Crazy. Absolutely crazy. | ||
| He said that for a brief moment he couldn't control anything and that's when the plane did what it did. | ||
| He said the gauges came back and it re-engaged. | ||
| The plane just re-engaged to its normal flight pattern. | ||
| We had no issues before, no issues after. | ||
| But just that moment. | ||
| Wow. 41,000 feet. | ||
| Oof. Ooh, boy. | ||
| Yeah, I guess they'll launch an investigation into it, and we'll see. | ||
| I mean, it sounds like it could have been an electric issue. | ||
| Sounds like it could have been something wrong with the plane's batteries or, you know, electric supply. | ||
| Sounds like it could have been... | ||
| Maybe the Don Dishwashing soap got in there. | ||
| Yeah, maybe that was it. | ||
| I mean, maybe it was... Could very well have been a cyber attack or even some sort of coronal mass injection, a sunspot that only affected the upper atmosphere, have an EMP effect on it. | ||
| I don't know, but that's very disturbing and I believe planes are generally guarded against that, shielded against that type of stuff for the most part since there is higher radiation in the upper atmosphere. | ||
| Fascinating stuff. Really interesting. | ||
| Let's go. Stan in Virginia has another comment on this. | ||
| Thank you for that call, Tim, and that information. | ||
| Because I did see that this morning, but I hadn't printed it out because none of the articles that I had quoted that. | ||
| But this article from CNN did. | ||
| Stan in Virginia, Dreamliner Airplane. | ||
| I believe you're referencing the video we actually played yesterday from Al Jazeera. | ||
| Of some of the engineers saying, I'm not going to get on this plane. | ||
| The people building the plane were like, no, there's no way. | ||
| I'm never flying on one of these. | ||
| Very disturbing. Stan, what do you got for us from Virginia? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so I wanted to talk about that, and I wanted to see... | |
| I kind of feel like there's some sort of Titanic scenario that we're kind of approaching here with... | ||
| Some kind of massive disaster happening on an airline or something where it'll fall out of the sky and then use that as an excuse to put some sort of crackdown on how aviation works and more restrictions. | ||
| I wanted to see how you were feeling about that. | ||
| I think you're 100% right. | ||
| Again, we know that People in power, they have made public their plans to not have air flight available to the masses. | ||
| They do not want you flying. | ||
| They do not want you flying regularly. | ||
| They really just, they don't want it. | ||
| And of course, they're blaming it on climate change, but that's not the real reason. | ||
| But if you just play it out in your own mind, if nothing dramatic is done soon, Very dramatic. | ||
| Because again, I think what we're seeing is largely the result of the buildup of years of DEI activity, not just in the plane manufacturing, but in the operation, in the aircraft, air tower control, hiring practices that they implemented. | ||
| So if nothing's... | ||
| I think it's pretty much inevitable that there's going to be a disaster that has massive, massive impact on the world. | ||
| That is, two planes colliding on the runway at full speed, and literally hundreds of people dying, bodies littering the tarmac. | ||
| A plane just straight up falling out of the sky, like the one we're talking about now, that, thank God, came back online after like 30 seconds, which is a very long time to fall, by the way, folks. | ||
| I guess at 41,000 feet, you have some time to the ground. | ||
| But if you go skydiving and you jump out at, I think, like 20,000 feet, you only have about a minute of free fall before you pull your chute. | ||
| And then you jump at 10,000. | ||
| So at 10,000 feet, you have about a minute of free fall before you pull your chute. | ||
| And you have about 5 to 10 minutes of time coming down with the chute. | ||
| But, you know, a minute... | ||
| You fall about half the way, if I'm not mistaken, about 5,000 feet. | ||
| So 30 seconds is a plane nosediving. | ||
| That's extremely dangerous. | ||
| And if it's any less than 40,000 feet, that could be a fatal dive. | ||
| But whether it's a... | ||
| Massive plane crash or planes colliding or a plane fire and people dying inside. | ||
| There's going to be a massive disaster. | ||
| And what is going to be the result? | ||
| They're going to say, well, you know, this corporation can't handle it. | ||
| We've got to have a government takeover. | ||
| We've got to do something. | ||
| People are going to want to do something to prevent this from happening again. | ||
| And even the airlines themselves are going to want to do something because as soon as that disaster happens, there's going to be a massive crash in the stock prices. | ||
| The companies are basically going to say, we're going to go bankrupt. | ||
| We need a bailout. So there will be a bailout. | ||
| The bailout will come with governmental controls. | ||
| Whether deliberate or not, and I tend to believe it's deliberate, the inevitable consequence of allowing this pattern of near disaster to continue is that there will be a massive disaster, there will be massive outcry to do something about it. | ||
| The only thing that our government can do about it would be to basically take over the airline industry. | ||
| And maybe that's all what it's leading up to. | ||
| As they consolidate every industry basically into one centralized control. | ||
| That could be it. That could be it. | ||
| And of course, once that happens... | ||
| Well, I'll just say, you know, being on the no-fly list might not be the worst thing in the world. | ||
| Back, folks. We're going to go out to your phone calls momentarily, but Robert Herr, the special counsel in the Biden classified documents case, is testifying in front of Congress right now as we speak. | ||
| We're getting a few clips from that. | ||
| You guys, actually, I just put in another one here, but first we'll go to this two-minute long clip. | ||
| Here is Robert Herr, special investigator, answering questions about whether and where Biden kept classified documents. | ||
| Let's watch. Mr. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Herr, classified documents were found at the Penn Biden Center? | |
| That's correct. They were found in President Biden's garage? | ||
| In Wilmington, Delaware, yes. | ||
| And in his basement den? | ||
| Also in the same home, yes. | ||
| In his main floor office? | ||
| Correct. And his third floor den? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Correct. At the University of Delaware? | |
| Correct. And at the Biden Institute? | ||
| Correct. So sort of everywhere. | ||
| Okay, so sort of all over the place, haphazardly unsecure. | ||
| Okay, very nice. | ||
| Very cool. Just remember that when you hear people like John Brennan in the video that we played last week, where he, of course, is describing the fact that they are going to withhold information from Donald Trump when he's Official candidate for the Republican Party or president. | ||
| They'll just withhold information from him. | ||
| And when he's talking about that, he's like, they found classified documents in his bathroom. | ||
| In his bathroom in Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| As if there's... | ||
| As if that matters. | ||
| It's not like it was a bathroom being used. | ||
| Actually put in a fairly secure place compared to boxes in a garage in Delaware. | ||
| But... None of it matters because their statements are meant to deceive you. | ||
| So they're just lying and pretending to be concerned about things they're not actually concerned about. | ||
| Or else he would be equally concerned, if not more concerned, about Joe Biden doing this and the documents being discovered not immediately after his presidency, but several years after his vice presidency. | ||
| Not only did he not have the authority to declassify documents as vice president, he didn't even have authority to have many of these. | ||
| Not only did he have them, he showed them to people who were not cleared, had no security clearance whatsoever. | ||
| We got one more video here. | ||
| Again, this is special counsel Robert Herr testifying this morning. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My team and I conducted a thorough independent investigation. | |
| We identified evidence that the president willfully retained classified materials after the end of his vice presidency when he was a private citizen. | ||
| This evidence included an audio-recorded conversation during which Mr. | ||
| Biden told his ghostwriter that he had, quote, just found all the classified stuff downstairs, end quote. | ||
| When Mr. Biden said this, he was a private citizen speaking to his ghostwriter in his private rental home in Virginia. | ||
| We also identified other recorded conversations during which Mr. | ||
| Biden read classified information aloud to his ghostwriter. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| But, you know, he's mentally incompetent to stand trial, so he'll get away with it, I guess. | ||
| Really something else. Really something else. | ||
| And we have this story about this whole event, which I just find extremely funny if you have been following Joe Biden for the last couple years. | ||
| What's his name? Her? Robert Her. | ||
| Never asked Biden about timing of son's death, contradicting president's indignant public response, transcript shows. | ||
| We did report on this at the time. | ||
| It was obvious. | ||
| It's just sort of nice to have it reinforced with the actual transcript. | ||
| But it basically goes like this. | ||
| Robert is questioning Joe Biden about classified documents that he's not supposed to have, but is, in fact, reading out loud on recordings to people without security clearances. | ||
| Joe Biden, in what he does every time he needs to deflect, in the most cynical and exploitative, like, it's just so repugnant on a moral level to me, that any time Joe Biden is criticized for things... | ||
| He brings up his dead son. | ||
| It's like, I can't even imagine the mindset. | ||
| It's just like, oh, I'm in trouble. | ||
| Better deploy the corpse of my son. | ||
| But that's what he does every time. | ||
| Like, he does it all the time. | ||
| That's why this is kind of funny to me, is it's like, yeah, yeah, no wonder. | ||
| Like, it's not a surprise to me that it wasn't Ben-Hur that was like, or Ben-Hur. | ||
| It wasn't Robert Hur that was like, tell me, when did your son die? | ||
| Like, why would he bring that up? | ||
| But it's Biden... Who constantly brings his dead son up in the most inappropriate times, usually when he's being criticized for something, as a way to deflect. | ||
| As if he can't have done anything wrong because his poor son died. | ||
| It's so despicable to me. | ||
| So again, he goes, sir, we're here to ask you about some classified documents you may have. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But did you know my son died? | |
| They're like, okay, when was that? | ||
| He's like, I don't know. I was, ah, gee. | ||
| Not the 90s. | ||
| Was it the 90s? | ||
| Was it the 90s? Like, he didn't know within, like, decades when his son died. | ||
| So, Joe Biden brings it up. | ||
| Out of nowhere, probably to cover something up. | ||
| And when he's asked about it, he actually doesn't know anything about it, doesn't remember it. | ||
| He thinks he died in Iraq. | ||
| He didn't. He died from cancer here. | ||
| And then when Robert Hur uses that as evidence of being like, this guy's not mentally all there. | ||
| He doesn't even remember within several years of when his son died. | ||
| You would think he would remember that. | ||
| That's evidence of a lack of mental acuity. | ||
| And then Joe Biden is like, well, why would he bring my dead son up? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why would he do that? | |
| Why would he bring up my dead son out of nowhere like that? | ||
| My poor son. My poor son that died. | ||
| He didn't. You did. | ||
| And you don't remember because you're an idiot, mentally incompetent, and probably have dementia. | ||
| But it's fine. You're just in charge of the nuclear arsenal. | ||
| Just madness. | ||
| Utter, unrestrained madness. | ||
| Continues. Unabated. | ||
| With that, we go out to your phone calls once again. | ||
| Tony in Texas says Texas is going to change its name. | ||
| Is it, Tony? Great. | ||
| I'm excited. What are we going to change our name to? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Actually, people are not aware of this, but there is no Texas anymore. | |
| It is officially Texaco because Mexico has officially annexed Texas, and here's how they've done it. | ||
| I'm fixing to tell everybody a dirty little secret that they don't want people to know this, but people need to know this. | ||
| That's why they never talk about it. | ||
| We have an open border policy with Mexico. | ||
| Texas has 28 international bridges down there. | ||
| Where Mexicans can come and go as they want. | ||
| If they want to, they can come over here and stay. | ||
| Well, if you go down there and look at the 28 international bridges, there's traffic lined up for 100 miles at all of them trying to get into America. | ||
| And here's how—people don't understand this either. | ||
| Sixty percent of all the illegals in this country are Mexican, and they simply just walked or drove across the border down there. | ||
| Yeah, there's a certain percentage of people from other countries that swim the border, but the majority just go across one of the internet— National bridges. | ||
| And here's something else people need to understand. | ||
| The globalist Bush boys up there in Austin, from the governor all the way down, they've been stealing our money here in Texas for over 30 years and giving it to the illegals and their anchor babies. | ||
| See, there are no homeless illegals in Texas. | ||
| You find one and I'll kiss your rear. | ||
| That's because the government, local and state government, takes care of them here in Texas. | ||
| That's why Texas is a sanctuary state. | ||
| Do you want me to tell you everything Texas gives illegals? | ||
| You know, I don't think I need you to. | ||
| I think I'm fairly aware of it. | ||
| It might be not quite as much as they get from California. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, no, they get more than California. | |
| Is that right? All right, tell me quick. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, we got it. | |
| Well, first of all, when you get to Texas, you get a birth certificate if you have a kid, which all these illegals, Texas should not be giving birth certificates out to illegals. | ||
| Then they get in-state tuition. | ||
| Then once they get the birth certificate, they can put their whole family on the Texas Health and Human Services welfare system, which taxpayers of Texas pay for that. | ||
| They get car insurance. | ||
| They can buy land. They can buy businesses. | ||
| Oh, my God. It goes on and on. | ||
| It's a deliberate invasion, and you're not even kidding, at least in a racial aspect. | ||
| The majority of people in Texas now are Hispanic. | ||
| They're of Mexican or South American origin. | ||
| So, um... I guess we lost the long war, didn't we? | ||
| Darn it....segments of the American Journal. | ||
| You can follow us on Twitter. | ||
| Our Twitter account is at InfoJournal. | ||
| At InfoJournal. That's right. | ||
| You can follow us on X at InfoJournal. | ||
| We've been releasing clips there. | ||
| We've had some trouble getting up the Daily Dispatch because of some technical issues, but we'll get that up as soon as possible. | ||
| Of course, you can follow me at Harrison H. Smith. | ||
| You can also go to HarrisonHillsmith.substack.com to get all of the links that we use every day, as well as access to our video list, which is always huge despite not getting... | ||
| To even like a third of the videos that we go to, they are available for you on my substack. | ||
| And of course, everything we do here is brought to you by Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| InfowarsJournal. InfowarsJournal on Twitter. | ||
| At InfowarsJournal on Twitter. | ||
| Follow us there. You can communicate with us there. | ||
| Tag us on things you want to see. | ||
| And of course, share the clips, please. | ||
| That is such an easy and effective way to contribute to the Infowar. | ||
| After all, without you, we are nothing. | ||
| With you, we can take down this entire corrupt system. | ||
| I hope that you support us in this mission by going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Bodies is still 40% off. | ||
| Incredibly powerful turmeric supplement with curcuminoids. | ||
| 95% we've been through just the incredible power of this stuff and the fact that, as we read in the scientific paper last week, curcumin, while it's incredibly effective in a number of different ways from inflammation, energy production, I mean so much other stuff, It's only accessible if it's combined with other... | ||
| It's only bioavailable, meaning it's only absorbed and useful to your body when it's combined with other things like piperine from black pepper. | ||
| Bodies has it all. | ||
| 2,000% absorption with piperine compared to curcumin by itself. | ||
| So by combining these ingredients, we get the most out of them. | ||
| And of course, it keeps us on the air in the fight and helps you to achieve your health goals. | ||
| Moving forward here as we take this two front approach to the InfoWare. | ||
| Collective political action to fix the system on one hand. | ||
| Personal, individual action to protect yourself from the corrupt system until we achieve that first goal. | ||
| InfoWareStore.com. | ||
| For you, for us, for America, go to InfoWareStore.com and support us today. | ||
| With that, we're just going to go out to phone calls. | ||
| This last segment, we've got people awaiting James from Indiana. | ||
| I want to talk about the two-tiered justice system. | ||
| James, thanks for calling in. You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, last night on Hannity, he had a Gold Star father on that was charged for yelling at Biden. | |
| Congressman Issa is submitting names of people that disrupted Congress and that charge, as he wants the charges against the Gold Star father, dropped immediately. | ||
| The two-tier justice system is a national disgrace, and no one's been held accountable for the Afghanistan debacle. | ||
| And that is honestly just the beginning. | ||
| I mean, people interrupt Congress all the time. | ||
| To my knowledge, the only person ever actually charged with this would be like that Gold Star father and like Owen Schroer. | ||
| But practically, once a week, there's some climate protester or Gaza protester interrupting proceedings. | ||
| Nothing. Nothing is done. | ||
| It is absolutely a two-tiered justice system. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Maybe more than that. When Trump was in South Carolina, he gave a shout-out to Laura Loomer. | |
| Then he went off on the VA employee that stole $400,000. | ||
| He wasn't prosecuted or fired. | ||
| Then you have medicated veterans that do nothing wrong having cases manufactured against them. | ||
| There is an update on the Colorado VA scandal. | ||
| No one will be fired, and the managers will be transferred to go screw up another facility. | ||
| And lastly, South Bend, Indiana, Old Mayor Pete Stopping Grounds. | ||
| It came out prosecutors and investigators may have been fabricating testimony because it's not about justice but winning at all costs. | ||
| Mm-hmm. | ||
| 100%. No, they're corrupting everything. | ||
| It is a... | ||
| It's like a universal conspiracy at this point. | ||
| They're corrupting everything. | ||
| They know they're corrupting everything. | ||
| The voters know they're corrupting everything, but they've been indoctrinated into a cult that believes that... | ||
| Victory is necessary at all costs. | ||
| And legitimate system of justice is a small price to pay for stopping, you know, orange, Nazi, Hitler, Trump. | ||
| So if they got to commit a little fraud to get that, they got to commit a little fraud to get it. | ||
| And that's just what they do. You know, I had somebody I was talking to about voter fraud. | ||
| And I was trying to explain to him that you didn't need a nationwide conspiracy. | ||
| There's only a certain number of places where the fraud happened. | ||
| Very deliberate, specific places. | ||
| The five swing states. | ||
| And within those five swing states, the major metropolitan areas. | ||
| So you can hyper-localize your corruption to these areas. | ||
| And you can sway the entire election completely. | ||
| And somebody's saying, yeah, but it's not... | ||
| Like, who would do that? It's not worth it. | ||
| People aren't just gonna, you know, commit voter fraud. | ||
| And I was like, well, wasn't there that lady that committed voter fraud in Texas? | ||
| She was charged, but she was only charged because she was on tape doing it. | ||
| I think Project Veritas busted her. | ||
| And she was charged with voter fraud. | ||
| She's like, well, yeah, that happened. | ||
| Okay, well, what was that lady doing it for? | ||
| A couple hundred bucks? | ||
| People are willing to sell out the voting system for a couple hundred bucks if they gain personally. | ||
| You don't think that A, there are millions of dollars going around to grease people's palms and to turn a blind eye to what's going on. | ||
| And they don't even see it as a bad thing because they're like, hey... | ||
| If I cheat and we win, we avoid Trump 2.0, which will destroy democracy. | ||
| So to preserve democracy and make some cash on the side, there's a lot of incentive to manipulate our system, whether it's the voting system, the justice system. | ||
| The incentive is there to pervert it. | ||
| There's not a lot of incentive not to. | ||
| Because what happens when it's discovered that you are totally corrupt and completely political and engaged in open, obvious, in-your-face corruption? | ||
| Like, I don't know, the Attorney General of New York going after Trump and announcing before she's ever elected, like, I'll just spend all my time going after Trump. | ||
| That's what I'll do as AG. What happens to them? | ||
| Nothing. They're promoted. | ||
| They're celebrated. They're encouraged. | ||
| They're called heroes. They get promotions. | ||
| They get spots in the media. | ||
| So it's like there's no disincentive for corruption because you'll be rewarded. | ||
| And there's plenty of incentive because there's plenty of people with plenty of money to encourage you and, of course, the political atmosphere of cult-like adherence to corruption. | ||
| The mainstream media's proclamations of Trump being a Nazi in the death of democracy. | ||
| See, yeah, it's all corrupt. | ||
| It is a universal, societal-wide corruption, like a cancer that's made its way into our bones and infects just about every cell. | ||
| Thanks for the call, James. | ||
| Let's go to Sean in New York, line one, talking about the general madness of the world. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Sean. You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello, Harrison. | |
| Happy birthday to you. | ||
| And all the info warriors. But first, I'd like to bring up at Buckingham Palace, years ago, they released a website where it said, shapeshifting queen appearances today in national form. | ||
| I don't know if you ever saw that. But I did bring up to you about the naked kids falling out of Buckingham Palace onto the floor beyond the 10-foot walls. | ||
| And also, did you know that there was a video of Princess Diana saying, you bloody fool, help me. | ||
| Meanwhile, the chauffeur ended up getting a high-paying executive job at Pfizer. | ||
| Is that fact or fiction? | ||
| Anyway, so I would like to bring up Noah Harrison. | ||
| Yes, yes, Noah. I'm enjoying this. | ||
| Please continue. Oh, yes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So the Tate brothers and their innocence, those girls went out publicly and said it was consensual, if I remember correctly. | |
| And also, did you know that BlackRock bought ancestry for billions of dollars during the middle of the pandemic? | ||
| But also, if you black out between Australia and New Zealand, And the instruments go totally blank. | ||
| Does that turn into a 007 movie? | ||
| Oh, yes, it does. | ||
| Actually, it is a 007 movie where they use the direct energy weapon to split the pathway for the Korean army to come up and take over and such and such. | ||
| So anyway, remember the Alamo and don't let them burn the books. | ||
| History repeats itself. Have a good day. | ||
| Brilliant. Thank you very much for that. | ||
| I don't know which, hold on, you saw on the line, which 007 movie was that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know either. It was on TV last night. | |
| I try to watch American TV, but I mostly watch, you know, Ukrainian news. | ||
| Of course, of course. You've got to keep up to date. | ||
|
unidentified
|
To find out what's going on in the subways of Brooklyn, you know, about the National Guard and such. | |
| Look, you know, you started... | ||
|
unidentified
|
I heard the Emperor, what was her name? | |
| Governor Hochul, the Emperor? | ||
| Yes, yes, the Emperor Hochul and her deployment of her armed guards in the subway. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You'll be questioned like this was 1980s Giuliani. | |
| Hey, at least Giuliani was effective. | ||
| Thank you very much for the call. | ||
| We're coming up to the end of the show here. | ||
| I'm telling you, the royals, I mean, you bring it up. | ||
| You're talking about their friendships with pedophiles. | ||
| The murder of Diane. | ||
| I mean, Princess Di. She, like, wrote letters where it's like, if I die in a car accident, it's because I was murdered. | ||
| She'd, like, seal that letter and, like, gave it to somebody who opened it after her death. | ||
| It is a... It is a cesspit of immeasurable size hidden beneath the glitz and glamour of the royals because they're very useful to the people that have controlled them since the fall of Napoleon. | ||
| Thanks for being with us, everybody. We'll see you tomorrow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
| Infowars.com forward slash show. | ||
| But it all boils down to this. | ||
| We're bringing you hardcore information on the New World Order. | ||
| We told you about lockdowns and poison shots that would attack your immune system decades before. | ||
| We exposed Bohemian Grove first. | ||
| We exposed 9-11 before it happened. | ||
| I am in the zeitgeist, but I cannot continue to fight the globals by your support. | ||
| So spread this report, spread this video, and get great products you need at the same time funding our operation at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Right now, Bonnie's Ultimate Turmeric Formula, 95% humanoid, the strongest out there. | ||
| On sale, 40% off, about to go off sale. | ||
| We also have Nitric Boost. | ||
| It flushes out your arteries, your veins, your heart with all the key compounds. | ||
| Dr. Minkovich says it's one of the best compounds and formulas out there. | ||
| It is amazing. | ||
| Nitric Boost. We have TurboForce, 10-hour clean energy, the best clean, supercharged energy you're going to find out there. | ||
| Discounted. | ||
| It's at InfowarStore.com or 888-253-3139. | ||
| 888-253-3139. |
Export Selection