All Episodes
Feb. 19, 2024 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:24:49
The American Journal: Truckers Around USA To ‘Boycott’ NYC Over Trump Fraud Ruling - FULL SHOW - 02/19/2024
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:47:18
l
laura loomer
13:05
Appearances
g
greg reese
04:44
j
jon bowne
01:59
o
owen shroyer
02:54
Clips
a
alex jones
00:07
m
michael shellenberger
00:32
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
greg reese
The following report is from Dr.
Ana Maria Mielcia's recent article entitled, Hydrogel Platform Enables Versatile Data Encryption and Decryption.
The building blocks of hydrogels are being found in the COVID vaccine, and hydrogels are being found in the blood of both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
They are the so-called blood clots that are being found around the world, and these hydrogels can now be programmed, encrypted, and decrypted.
According to Mielcia, they are the substrate of the brain-computer interface and the primary method of fusing humans with machines, as she described by referencing MIT research in the article, Hydrogel Interfaces for Merging Humans and Machines.
Elements which Mielcia and Clifford Carnicom found with near-infrared spectroscopy in the blood of the unvaccinated exposed to shedding and environmental contamination include hydrogel plastics such as polynes, vinyl, nylon, Kevlar, and spider silk proteins, as well as other nanotechnology signatures such as silicone and sulfur.
This technology hijacks methyl groups, which are needed to detoxify and create glutathione in the body.
Hydrogels used for the encrypted programmable technology include polyvinyl alcohol and polycaprolactone.
Both of these hydrogels are listed as stealth nanoparticles in the Moderna patent for lipid nanoparticle composition.
This suggests that not only those who received the shot have this hydrogel encryption technology in their bodies, but also those who have experienced shedding and environmental contamination, which is just about everyone.
These hydrogels are known to be programmable and encrypted.
This technology can behave as brain storage.
It can store memories and visual information in an individual's brain.
And it can be chemically induced to be securely encrypted and decrypted, allowing for the secure recording and storage of confidential visual information.
This provides a platform for secure financial transactions, which is a requirement for a digital ID. MIT researchers have discussed how this very same technology can be used to fuse humans with machines.
And while they've had problems working it out in the past, a recent paper has announced they've found success using the very same elements found in both the blood of the vaccinated and unvaccinated by Miel Sia and Carnicom.
In a lecture by Professor Sakrat Kisroev at the University of Miami, it is discussed how advanced materials can be used for interfacing machines and the human brain.
He references a research project funded by DARPA, wherein magnetic nanoparticles are key to this technology.
Mielcia has published research that shows how the COVID shots alter torsion fields in the body and produce magnetism.
A review by the RAND Corporation, Brain-Computer Interfaces, U.S. Military Applications and Implications, discussed the convergence of human with machine.
In an interview with big pharma whistleblower Karen Kingston, Kingston discusses this self-assembly nanotechnology and how the spike protein is an engineered device triggered by electromagnetic frequency and how the quantum dots are gene editing technology.
This nanotechnology appears to be distributed via chemtrails, the food and water supply, medications, and in all of the scheduled vaccines for children.
It has been found by multiple scientists in the blood of both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
And the fact that this widespread technology is being ignored while the topic of mRNA is being pushed into the mainstream is of great concern.
Mielcia has shown that the new protocols being sold to the public as a way of reversing the negative effect of the COVID shots have no effect on these hydrogels.
And it would seem that well over a billion people are infected with them.
While many are talking about an archaic implanted computer chip, It seems that the latest breakthrough technology has already been deployed without anyone's consent.
The situation almost seems hopeless, but where there is a will, there is a way.
And now is not the time to hide our head in the sand.
The human body is miraculous, and our potential is endless.
The more people addressing this dire situation, the better chances we have of finding a remedy.
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
unidentified
It's Monday, February 19th in the year of 2024.
Four.
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
Welcome to The American Journal. My name's Harrison Smith, your host.
Thanks so much for joining us.
We have a lot to talk about today.
Videos to show you, of course, will probably open up spaces and or phone calls a little bit later.
Not sure which one we'll exactly do here.
Well, like I said, we have a lot to get into and a lot of...
We'll be covering the news, the headlines, as we always do.
There's a couple other topics I want to get into, not as immediate or pressing, but more historical topics.
We'll get into some of those here in just a little bit.
Let's just get right into it, shall we?
Here it is, your Daily Dispatch. All right, here it is, folks.
Your Daily Dispatch for Monday, February 19th, 2024.
President's Day. Happy President's Day, everyone.
Here's our first story.
Trans women's milk as good as breast milk.
Says the demonic spirit occupying the D NHS Trust.
An NHS Trust has said breast milk produced by trans women who were assigned male at birth is as good for babies as that produced by a mother who is given birth.
In a letter to campaigners, the University of Sussex Hospital's NHS Trust said that the milk produced by trans women after taking a combination of drugs is comparable to that produced following the birth of a baby.
It's comparable.
Well, if you've ever looked at an ingredients list on baby formula, this might not come as a surprise to you.
They seem to think that babies just love eating horrible crap Completely insane.
The hospital trust, which runs Royal Sussex County Hospital, Worthing Hospital, and Royal Alexandra's Children's Hospital, among others, was also the first in Britain to use the term chest feeding in place of breastfeeding because it's considered by some to be more satanic.
I'm sorry, inclusive. To be more inclusive.
The trust created what it's called Britain's first clinical and language guidelines supporting trans and non-binary birthing people.
So there's that.
There's that. It really is the modern incarnation of 2 plus 2 equals 5.
You have men breastfeeding babies.
So go ahead and check that off the dystopian revelations end of the world checklist.
Yeah, we'll get into that again in just a little bit.
Meanwhile, and consider this following the report we just showed from Greg Reese, explaining just a few of the horrific side effects from the mRNA shots.
Opposition to mRNA injections is now considered a crime in France.
The French government just passed a law to fine and imprison people for refusing to get injected with the mRNA vaccines.
All opposition to mRNA LMP, that's liquid nanoparticle injections in France, is now considered a sectarian aberration.
Violations carry with them a €45,000 fine and three years imprisonment.
Quote, It will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state, tweeted Dr.
Kat Lindley. Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable for fines and imprisonment.
Just taking it to a whole new level.
And we can get, I mean...
Yeah, okay, great, great.
So the vaccines don't work.
The more of them that you get, the more likely you are to get the disease.
They also can kill you, causing myocarditis and turbo cancer and any other number of deadly interactions with the human body.
But criticize it and you could be sent to jail for three years.
What is happening anymore?
The theme of today, just like the theme of every day here on Infowars, is total and complete inversion.
Not just people being wrong, but people believing the literal opposite of what is true in every possible aspect of human society.
It is beyond baffling.
We'll continue. Trucking company cancels shipment to New York City on Monday.
As Patty McMurray reported on Saturday, truckers bravely exposed some of the worst COVID shutdowns in the world when they parked their trucks in Ottawa to protest the Iron Fist approach used against citizens by the Justin Trudeau regime.
Truckers in the U.S. showed solidarity for their Canadian neighbors and helped block shipping between U.S. and Canada in Detroit and Michigan.
Governor Gretchen Whitmer, at the time, who was being considered for Joe Biden's VP, quickly threatened arrest for truckers who dared block the Ambassador Bridge, while American truckers now reportedly threatening to stop deliveries into New York City over the grotesque $350 million judgment against President Trump and his son Don Jr.
and Eric by partisan hack judge Ingeron on Friday.
Aside from the first responders, is there any profession in the United States that proudly wears patriotism on its sleeves Like the American trucker, I of course, as you may predict, am completely in favor of this, should absolutely be the case.
It's just one of these things about the modern day.
We talk about it every day here on InfoWars.
The way that leftists get positions of power and then to them, there's no obligations that come along with that.
There's no sacred duty to uphold the law regardless of their personal feelings.
If they get into a position of power, to them, they now have the right to manipulate and use and abuse that power to achieve whatever personal political...
Ethnic ends that they want to achieve so if you make them a judge They don't sit there thinking I am now an impartial Manifestation of the state who has a higher sacred duty, honor bound to come to the right conclusion regardless of my personal feelings.
No, they think I have the robes now.
I get to decide what happens and I'm going to punish my enemies.
I'm in this position now and a lot of it has to do with the false projection of the big bad conservative boogeyman where they're Enveloped in this atmosphere of lies that says that white Christian men always abuse their power and take advantage of people.
Utter nonsense.
But because they truly, sincerely believe that, they think, I'm just doing what they do.
Now it's my turn. I'm in charge now.
So now I'll use it to benefit me and my people, just like they used it to benefit theirs.
So whatever position they have, they see it as a blank check, carte blanche, just full permission to use whatever power they've acquired to achieve whatever ends they want.
And... We're stuck in this difficult situation where I really want to live in a country where that's not the case, where people appointed to positions of power or people holding power over other people wielded with objectivity and honor.
But if only one side is playing by those rules, it's a losing strategy to take.
So Again, we're sort of stuck in this limbo where it's like, I don't want to live in a world where people just use whatever power they have to achieve their ends, but I do.
I do live in that world, and we see it on display daily here.
And so then maybe, you know, you think, well, okay, fine.
If that's the way it's going to be, that's the way it's going to be.
The thing is, they might have academic professorships.
They might have Positions on benches of judge, councils.
I mean, they might have these sort of intellectual concepts or intellectual positions that they occupy, but largely conservatives are responsible for the production of food.
So if that's the power we occupy, well, that's a lot more convincing, I think.
That's a lot more convincing.
Power in the hands of the people who are responsible for you able to continue life.
Maybe that should be wielded with the same sort of subjective selfish intent that they wield their political power.
Maybe it's time for the people that grow and produce the food that the cities rely on for their basic sustenance.
Maybe that power should be weaponized just like they weaponize their positions in the health authority.
In the mainstream media, in the legal professions, maybe if they think that we live in a dog-eat-dog world where whatever power you have can and should be wielded against your enemies, well, they rely on us for food.
So Again, what I would love is if they would consider this for a second.
If they would just for a single second think, what if everybody acted like I act?
What if everybody treated their position in the way that I treat my position?
And you can play that out.
You can speculate on what that might look like and realize, oh my god, we would all die if the conservatives did that.
Maybe we shouldn't do that because we don't want to start this feedback loop where we end up starving to death in our cities.
But they don't think that way.
I guess I don't know whether they don't project that far or whether they just think conservatives are cowards that will never actually use power to achieve anything.
I don't know. I can't get in their minds.
But I do know that truckers and farmers and the vast majority of people who make the country actually function on a day-to-day basis are pretty hardcore conservative.
So maybe it's time that we get organized and start...
Approaching this political conflict with the same aggressive mentality that the leftists seem to have.
So, again, if they want to use their position as a judge to take down Donald Trump, even though their city is wracked with crime and they're just...
We're blatantly political activists in their position.
Well, maybe we can be political activists in our position.
Maybe the truck drivers and the farmers and the plumbers and the people that they rely on, maybe we can use our power in the same way that they use theirs.
I think it's a good idea.
I think we actually have the upper hand if we were to actually adopt the same dog-eat-dog, vicious, zero-sum game power games that the left seem to revel in.
You get they only revel in it because they're the only ones doing it.
They're the only ones that actually do this.
And again, it's because they've deceived themselves into believing that they're actually standing up against some power structure that they've been convinced doesn't wield its authority with objectivity or or honor.
But that's a lie.
That's just a lie. Everybody has human inclinations.
Everybody falls short of perfection every once in a while, but there is still a remnant of people that believe that you should be making decisions on the basis of the law and the position that you're in being used as unobjectively as possible or as objectively and unobtrusively but there is still a remnant of people that believe that you But those are all conservative people that believe that.
So we're in sort of a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
I don't know if it's the best example, but I just always think back to a documentary I was watching about.
I think it was like the Golden State Killer or something.
And one of the victims, one of the women that was killed by this guy who was prowling around at night and going into unlocked doors, going into unlocked houses and murdering people.
The day before, she was murdered by somebody coming in her house.
Her granddaughter was like, Grandma, you need to start locking your door.
It's dangerous out there.
There's this prowler. And the grandmother was like, I don't want to live in a world where we have to lock our doors.
She'd grown up her whole life in a world where Locking your door was something you did when you went out of town, right?
You didn't lock your door at night because you lived in a neighborhood with nice people and you didn't have to worry about a sexual deviant prowling into your house and killing you for fun.
So, you know, we're stuck in this thing where it's like, I don't want to live in a world where it's like this.
I don't want to live in a world where we lock our doors, where we have to weaponize our professions politically to get our way.
But I also don't want to be killed in my sleep by the Golden State Killer.
So you got to just do what you got to do.
And it sucks because it's then like a feedback loop where when people are locking their doors, other people start locking their doors.
People, you know, everybody's suspicious of one another.
Everybody starts trying to defend themselves, which in some ways can be, you know, you think, well, I'll just do it to them before they can do it to me.
It's a feedback loop of distrust and mistrust and evil.
That I hate to participate in, but I'd rather participate in it and survive than try to pretend it's not happening and be destroyed.
Meanwhile, moving on here, Trump's tough talk works.
Germany vows to spend over 2% GDP in defense for decades to come, pressures European allies to do the same.
From Gateway Pundit, first, the whole NATO apparatus and mainstream media landscape went into full meltdown mode with Donald Trump's suggestion that the U.S. would only help alliance countries that obey the minimum 2% GDP investment in defense.
And then Europe's greatest power, Germany, immediately announced that it would be fulfilling the spending level.
As you can read in Trump's Tough Talk Totally Works, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz now vows to meet NATO's agreed minimum and spend more than 2% of the GDP on defense.
And of course, he did this while president as well.
He did the same thing. It's where all those great pictures come from, where it's Donald Trump with his arms crossed, leaning back, and Angela Merkel and all the other Europeans pointing at his face and looking down on him.
This was what he was doing back then.
He achieved somewhat of an agreement.
But then when Biden got into office, they knew, okay, we don't have to actually fulfill our obligations anymore.
The... American government will just make up the shortfall of the spending on NATO. So I guess he's done it again.
He's done it again. All the outrage last week, all the outrage was about Donald Trump threatening to withdraw defense from our NATO partners.
How dare he? Well, for one thing, if he was still in office, there would be no need to worry about the armaments of the NATO partners because we wouldn't have a war in Europe.
So that's the first thing.
But secondly, all he's saying is that if you want us to protect you, you've got to fulfill your end of the bargain.
It's not that complicated. You agree?
We signed an agreement. We provide defense.
You pay for it.
If we're providing defense and you're not paying for it, it's not our fault that the agreement comes to an end.
You have to uphold your end.
So Donald Trump getting NATO to actually fulfill its obligations, making the world a safer place for NATO, even though he's not even president, doing more for international global peace than the actual president of the United States.
Which is just one of the many reasons that he is of course being targeted, persecuted, destroyed by the legal system in pseudo-legal machinations that are designed for no other purpose than to destroy and distract him and prevent him from being a political force that would do things like cut off funding to wars overseas.
And of course This is having all sorts of crazy consequences.
Last Friday the story came out.
The decision was announced.
Donald Trump would be fined $350 million for nothing.
For literally nothing.
I'm not exaggerating.
No, it was literally, completely and utterly fabricated.
I know a lot of Americans might have trouble believing this as they have some misplaced, misguided trust in our system, perhaps having grown up at a time when such trust was justified.
They think, well, it went through the system.
He had a fair trial.
This was just the decision and we have to accept it.
We're saving democracy after all.
And Trump's a criminal.
And I just want to remind you that the Soviet Union also had show trials.
Nazi Germany also had show trials.
What happened to Alexei Nalvani was entirely within the bounds of Russian law.
So What does it matter?
What does it matter? Or was this utterly and completely fabricated out of whole cloth, an utterly shameless and arbitrary decision to punish Donald Trump for his political position and popularity?
The answer is obvious, if you just look at the details of the case.
And that's true for every one of the cases that we cover on this show, going all the way back to January 6th and, you know, the trials that take place there.
If you have some mindless NPC level trust in the system, the American system right now, then you read headlines and make a great deal of assumptions.
So when you hear that Stuart Rhodes was thrown into prison for...
Conspiracy to commit insurrection.
You actually have trust in the system.
You might think that an insurrection happened and you might think that Stuart Rhodes conspired with the people who attempted to pull it off.
You might think that this was proven in court and that a completely unbiased jury and judge came to this conclusion on the basis of facts alone.
And so when you come away with it, you think, okay, Stuart Rhodes tried to do an insurrection, conspired with people to carry it out, and now he's facing the punishment for that, and everything's good and fine and normal, and you can proceed about your day.
If you actually look into the details of the case, and you read things like unspoken conspiracy, you see that the military maneuvers that are briefly mentioned in articles turn out to be a group of like four dudes walking through a crowd, each with their hand on the other's shoulder, So they can make sure they stay together as a group.
You realize that, no, none of this is valid.
None of this makes any sense.
None of this is legitimate application of law by the widest margin.
I mean, not even close.
So, in case you're wondering what happened with old Donald Trump, Donald Trump took out a loan, as he'd been doing for 40 years at that point, to build a building or to purchase Buildings or real estate for his business.
And in order to purchase it, he never used his own money.
He's been open about this forever.
He's like, basically, you're an idiot if you use your own money.
You can just get investors.
They use their money.
You can get debt, which is the bank's money.
So he was borrowing money to make a purchase, to make money, because he was a capitalist and a businessman.
And he offered up other properties as collateral.
If something were to go bad, if the venture were to go bankrupt, then the bank could confiscate his properties in order to receive payment for their loan.
He put up properties like Mar-a-Lago.
He gave them the assessed value.
The banks looked at the properties and looked at the assessed value, agreed to them being the collateral for the loan, signed the loan with Trump, gave him the money.
He spent the money to make more money, paid off the loans, and then years later the New York authorities just arbitrarily decided that he had overvalued Mar-a-Lago, put an obscenely Low assessment of their own about the price of Mar-a-Lago and then said,
because we think the value of Mar-a-Lago is lower than you said it was in your application for the loan, you don't have to pay $350 million and can't operate businesses in New York for three years.
Does any of that sound legal?
Any of that sound legitimate or good?
I remind you, they said that Mar-a-Lago with...
Dozens of acres of land, like 58 bedrooms, 33 bathrooms.
They valued it lower than another house in the neighborhood.
That would cost $20 million.
That was five bed, three bath.
So ten times the number of bathrooms and bedrooms, but they actually valued it lower than that because it was all arbitrary and a political maneuver to carry out a show trial to wear a facade of legitimacy to trick idiot boomers.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Like I said, we have a lot of stuff to discuss today.
The continuing fallout of the decision against Donald Trump.
The utterly arbitrary and capricious actions of the American judicial system, which are incredibly troubling, if I'm being honest.
Kind of horrifying, actually.
Considering that this can happen to one of the wealthiest, most important, most popular political activists in the entire country, how he's even surviving is hard to say, except that the more they attack him, the more people support him.
If that wasn't the case, you can just imagine how easily they could utterly eviscerate anybody who attempts to stand up to them.
That's why Trump's the last great hope.
And if you're not supporting Trump, you are truly not operating in all dimensions.
You're operating on two dimensions.
That's just what's happening.
And there's actually a story from The Hill about the New York governor trying to Trying to say that this isn't that big of a deal.
Don't worry about it, guys.
It's actually fine. No need to flee our state or anything.
We won't do it to you.
From the Hill, Hochul tells New York businesses not to fear about Trump's verdict.
Quote, nothing to worry about.
You got nothing to worry about.
Just don't stand up to us.
And sadly, that's the truth, and that's probably how a lot of the big billionaires feel.
They probably see what's happening to Trump and they think, well, that's what he gets for trying to stand up to the establishment.
That's what he gets for stepping above his station, interrupting the deep state New York Governor Kathy Hochul addressed New York business owners in a new interview and told them there was nothing to worry about after former President Trump was hit with a $355 million fine and a ban on conducting business in New York for three years.
Hochul joined John Something at the Cats Roundtable at WABC 770 AM where she was asked if other New York business people should be worried that, quote, they can do that to the former president.
They can do that to anybody.
She responds, quote, I think this is a really extraordinary, unusual circumstance that the law-abiding and rule-following New Yorkers who are business people have nothing to worry about because they're very different from Donald Trump and his behavior.
Hochul responded, that's kind of...
Kind of get taking the mask off a little bit, isn't it?
No, nobody else has to worry about this.
They're not Donald Trump. See, we changed the law to apply to him and him alone.
We exert our power against him and him alone.
If you're not Donald Trump, in other words, if you're not trying to actually get involved in the political process to make a positive change, you'll be fine.
You can... Commit fraud.
I mean, it's New York City.
It's New York City. Wall Street's entire business model is fraud.
Fraud in one level or another.
I mean, the whole thing is fraudulent because it's all predicated on fiat money supply that doesn't exist.
We should show the clip I played on War Room last Friday.
It's literally the New Zealand central bankers going, it's a great business we're in.
We print the money and people act like it's real.
So we take our fiduciary responsibility very seriously.
I mean, I'm not paraphrasing.
That's... So the whole thing is fraudulent.
The whole thing is a big illusion that they think you're a sucker for playing along with.
That's just the first thing.
But the entire business model of Wall Street is inventing new pseudo-legal ways to manipulate the market.
And basically trying to make as much money as possible before the regulators can catch up to what you're doing.
Because it's all a fraudulent, invisible, imaginary casino that they're operating in, they just get to make up things.
And this is how everything, when it comes to all the stuff you hear, if you turn on the financial news network, where it's just like...
Buybacks and hedging and short-selling and double buybacks and all this stuff.
It's all stuff that you can hear in their internal recordings and documents and everything where they're like, yeah, there's no law that says we can't do this, so let's do it until they write the law that says we can't.
No one's ever done this before, so they don't have regulations against it, so it's not technically illegal, so let's just do it until they write a law to stop us from doing it.
And it's a constant game of leapfrog where they're constantly trying to stay one step ahead of the regulators by coming up with new, elaborate, and seemingly legitimate-sounding ways to consolidate their wealth and steal all of our money.
So that's just how the business world works.
That is Wall Street. So again, for the governor of New York to be like, For all of you upstanding and law-abiding businessmen, nothing to worry about unless you run against us, unless we happen to dislike you, in which case you'll be destroyed.
And we know Elon Musk just moved Tesla from, or I think it was Tesla, right, from being incorporated in Delaware to being incorporated in Texas because a Delaware judge decided that, just on his own, that Elon Musk shouldn't get a billion dollars that he was actually owed from the business that he started.
And just like Donald Trump, Elon Musk is facing investigation and subversion from an entire network of authorities, FCC, the FAA, like anybody, again, anybody in a position of power that can move on Elon Musk was instructed to move on Elon Musk.
And so he did.
And so they did. And so he's leaving now.
So anybody, and you know, it's almost ironic because if you wanted to actually solve major problems in America, whether it's illegal immigrants taking jobs or circumventing environmental controls that actually would keep people healthy,
like the corporate interests that allow chloroquine The gender bending sterility ingredient to be in our mass manufactured oat products.
We could stop any of these things by actually doing things like what they're doing to Donald Trump.
Like if you actually have a company that's either bending the rules or bending the law or abusing the law or hiring illegal immigrants or Putting the entire country at risk because of their irresponsible financial activities.
What we do now is we bail those people out with government money and they take billion dollar bonuses and jet off to Aruba for the afternoon.
If instead the CEO of the company was hauled into court, fined hundreds of millions of dollars and banned from doing business for three years, we could get a lot of problems solved.
It wouldn't just solve whatever problem that person was causing.
By throwing them in prison, or not even prison, just banning them from doing business and humiliating them and causing a lot of problems for them, not only would it stop what they're doing, but every other CEO would go, oh my god, that could happen to me.
I better not... We're good to go.
Yeah, if you're a CEO out there in New York who's taking advantage of your position to do things you shouldn't be able to do and hurt people by taking money you don't deserve, then you should be worried.
Because look at what we'll do to you.
It doesn't matter how powerful you are.
We'll bring you down. The fact that she's saying the opposite of that is just more proof that it's only Donald Trump they're going after.
Which again, it's just...
Annoying that they could do this against actual criminals, but instead they tell those criminals, don't worry about it.
You're not Donald Trump.
Continue with business as usual.
Well, they're at it again, folks.
They're at it again, but America is slowly but surely waking up.
And I find we're in a difficult position where, obviously, When you're talking about all of society, there's a...
There's a weight to the movement.
There's a...
What's the opposite of entropy, right?
There's a momentum that you can't just slam on the brakes.
When we're talking about trying to change the entire trajectory of America or the Western world...
It's like trying to stop or change course in a cruise ship.
Can't exactly slam on the brakes, especially if you're not the ones who are controlling the ship.
If people controlling the ship are purposefully driving towards a rocky shoal, we're in a little tugboat outside, that makes the job even more difficult.
Again, you can't expect the brakes to slam on and the Cruise ship just come to a screeching halt and do a 180 and start driving the other way.
It's not going to happen like that.
It's going to be a slow process.
It's going to take a long time.
It's going to be difficult to change the directory, the direction that we're going, the trajectory that we're headed.
But then you do the calculations and you go, okay, if we don't move quickly, If we're going to hit the shoals in five minutes, that's all the time that we have to change the cruise ship direction.
So instead of being able to push it gently and take the time required to change the path of this massive object, well, if you take the time necessary to change that direction, you're going to hit the rocks.
So we're very close to the rocks.
There's a cliff that we're headed towards beyond which there's very little hope of Any real recovery.
Any real ability to survive what's going on.
You may have total collapse and little pockets being created that could maybe start over and try to rebuild what we have now, but if we want to keep what we have now and actually progress into the future in a positive direction, we really don't have that long.
So, again, we're in the sort of damned if you do, damned if you don't situation where if you If you try to change the direction of the cruise ship calmly with your little tugboat, just nudging it a little bit in order to correct the course, knowing that eventually you'll get back on track and you got to do it in a way that doesn't...
Cause alarm or the people who are driving the cruise ship towards the Shoals to realize what you're doing.
We don't have that long.
We just don't have that long because the Shoals aren't that far away.
So then it's like, okay, so in order to change the direction of the cruise ship before it hits the Shoals, we got to go in and take over the cruise ship.
We got to just do it now because we don't have much time.
But then if you act that aggressively, the people on the cruise ship will be like, you're pirates and we have to stop you.
So I don't know if that illustration makes too much sense, but in terms of our demographic and cultural and just ability to uphold the systems that we rely on, those things are collapsing at an extremely rapid rate.
And the more they collapse, the faster they collapse, like a snowball rolling downhill.
The bigger it gets, the faster it rolls.
The more snow it gathers, the bigger it gets, the faster it rolls.
So the more people we allow into our country across the southern border, the worse things get, the more overloaded our systems are, the less our money, tax dollars are able to go towards us and making our lives better.
And also, the more those people vote, the more those people advocate for bringing in more illegal immigrants, the more illegal immigrants, the more illegal immigrants, right?
So it's a snowball rolling down the hill.
So again, we're very close to the point where there is no salvaging the cruise ship of America.
And again, we're stuck in this damned if you do, damned if you don't situation where what is required to correct the course is by necessity precluded from us.
So what are we going to do?
How are we going to fix this?
Well, I have some ideas.
And again, you can just take over the cruise ship.
And change direction without having to use the tugboat, but we're in tugboat mode right now.
One of the ways would be what's happening with these truckers, with trucking companies and trucking networks refusing to deliver shipments to New York City, which again, if they're going to use their position as judges to destroy their political opponents, Then we should use our position as providers of sustenance to get our way.
I mean, fair is fair.
It's a dog-eat-dog world, I guess.
And so we have to eat the other dogs now.
American truckers are reportedly threatening to stop deliveries into New York City over the grotesque $350 million judgment against President Trump and his sons, Don and Eric, bipartisan hack judge Ingeron on Friday.
Aside from first responders, this Gateway Pundit article asks, is there any other profession in the United States that proudly wears patriotism on its sleeves like the American truckers?
An American trucker who goes by Chicago Ray shared a video on social media yesterday where he explained why truckers across America are planning to stop delivering to NYC. According to TikTok user Survival Junkie2, a company previously expected to provide a load for transportation to New York, announced that it no longer has any loads destined for the state.
Quote, I just received a call from a company that I was getting a load from and they said they don't have any loads going to New York, so if you're in New York, you won't be receiving anything from these drivers.
So good, again, I would rather live in a world where people just did their jobs and, you know, politics was outside of it.
But, again, if they've got judges and professors and teachers and elementary school teachers and city council people, if they're all using whatever power they have to get their way, then I guess we have to use our power to get our way.
And that's just how it is. That's how it goes.
Again, from the Hill, Obscene Award Against Trump is Testing New York Legal Systems Integrity.
In laying the foundation for a sweeping decision against former President Donald Trump, Judge Arthur Ingeron observed that this is a venal sin, not a mortal sin.
Yet at $355 million, one would think that Ingeron had found Trump to be the source of the original sin.
The judgment against Trump and his family and associates was met with a level of unrestrained celebration by many in New York that bordered...
On the indecent, Attorney General Letitia James declared not only that Trump would be barred from doing business in New York for three years, but the damages would come roughly to 460 million once interest was included.
That makes the damages against Trump greater than the gross national product of some countries, including Micronesia.
Yet the court admitted that not a single dollar was lost from the bank in these dealings.
Indeed, witnesses testified from the bank, by the way, that they wanted to do more business with Trump, who was described as a whale client with high-yield business opportunities.
So yes, he was charged with committing fraud against these banks, who actually went and testified, no, he did not commit fraud.
We agreed to using Mar-a-Lago as collateral.
He paid us back.
We want to do more business with him.
He's a really good moneymaker.
And the court decided, no, actually he's an evil tyrant and we have to become tyrants to oppose him.
This is an interesting thread from Matt Wallace that really breaks down how absurd the basis of this argument is.
Because like everything that we deal with here, it's not just the decision that was made, and we can get into why that was wrong, but the decision itself is predicated on the assessment of Mar-a-Lago being worthless, which then we can get into Letitia James and the fact she got elected by saying, I'll go after Trump.
I mean, the levels of corruption and manipulation and lies that we're dealing with, it's a very well-constructed layer cake, I guess you could say.
But the basis of this decision, the basis of this punishment goes back to the valuing of Mar-a-Lago at $18 million.
Matt Wallace breaks this down on Twitter.
He says, proof that Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago could actually be valued at well over $1 billion.
He points out a 6288 square foot house on only less than half an acre, a few doors down, valued at a staggering $20 million.
That equals nearly 50 million per acre, and that isn't even on the beachfront.
A $45 million house in the same neighborhood is a new construction home on less than half an acre with no beach frontage.
That is a value which, along with the home cost, accounts for over $100 million an acre.
So $45 million house on half an acre.
Okay, just so we're clear here.
This one, which has beach frontage and a large mansion, is estimated to be worth over $70 million at 1.87 acres.
That's approximately $37 million per acre.
Meanwhile, Mar-a-Lago has over 65,000 square feet of lavish architecture on approximately $17 million.
Acres of pristine beachfront land.
Using the same price per acre as the top examples and accounting for the location of beachfrontage, that means Trump's estate could be worth well over $1.7 billion.
And yet they said that Mar-a-Lago, the 17-acre, 55-bedroom house, is somehow worth less than half of a half-acre mansion in the same neighborhood.
Blatant, blatant fraud.
We'll be right back, and we have a special call with Laura Loomer in the next hour.
unidentified
Stay with us. Angie Davis is her name.
owen shroyer
Her job is to sit down at that news desk and read whatever is on that teleprompter.
That is her job.
unidentified
We should note that during our conversation Kennedy made false claims about the COVID-19 vaccines.
Data shows that the COVID-19 vaccines prevented millions of hospitalizations and deaths from the disease.
He also made misleading claims about the relationship between vaccination and autism.
Research shows that vaccines and the ingredients used for the vaccines do not cause autism, including multiple studies involving more than a million children and major medical associations like the American Academy of Pediatrics and the advocacy group Autism Speaks.
We've used our editorial judgment and not including extended portions of that exchange in our interview.
owen shroyer
She doesn't know anything about the vaccines being linked to autism.
She doesn't know anything about the COVID-19 vaccines.
She doesn't know anything about all the deaths, all the strokes, all the heart attacks, all the cardiac arrest.
She doesn't even know, I bet she doesn't even know what the VAERS reporting system is.
She doesn't know any of this stuff.
And she goes on TV and reads off that teleprompter as if she does.
She's a liar.
You are a liar, Lindsey Davis.
And I'm sorry that you chose that because you might not actually be a liar as a person.
You might actually be a good person.
But you go on corporate news ABC and you lie to your audience when you tell them that the COVID-19 vaccine has no data that shows side effects.
And when you tell them there's no link between vaccines and autisms, you just lie.
So you have to understand, most of your local TV shows, show hosts, not all, there are exceptions, but I've been there, I've been in local TV, I've been in local radio, I know them.
Most of them, their day goes like this.
They wake up, they drive their fancy cars to the studios, they probably look at some news and some stuff, and then they sit and make up for an hour or two hours, and then their producers bring them all of their talking points and what's gonna be put on that teleprompter for them to read.
And then they read it, and then they go home, and they start the whole process over.
I don't need to spend a bunch of time explaining what we do here at Infowars, because it's a lifestyle for us.
unidentified
No, there's no teleprompters in here.
owen shroyer
There's no corporate-backed producers or sponsors telling us what we can and can't say.
No, it's truly a lifestyle.
There's not too many people that you could call 30 minutes before a three-hour show and say, hey, I need you to host, they could actually come in and host that show.
All of our hosts, all of our guests here could do that because it's a lifestyle.
We live it. We breathe it.
Just like most of you in the audience.
Not like Lindsey Davis on ABC News who gets paid to read off a teleprompter and lie to you.
And yes, it's so perfect that the crew puts this video up.
I mean, let's go ahead and go to some audio.
We might as well as we go to break here because this is everything.
This is your corporate press.
They're all lying to you.
unidentified
The sharing of biased and false news has become all too common on social media.
Unfortunately, some members of the media use their platforms to push their own personal lives.
owen shroyer
So no, you're not hearing an audio glitch.
That's the Mockingbird Press.
That's the mainstream media, all parroting and reading the exact same corporate talking points and corporate teleprompters that they're told to read, and they don't even know what the hell's going on.
So, but you see, that's what I'm talking about.
unidentified
I didn't give that video to my crew.
owen shroyer
They live this.
We're synced up.
When I start talking about the fake corporate controlled press, they immediately think, hey, let's pull up that compilation of all those local TV hosts saying the exact same thing on the exact same story.
harrison smith
All right, folks, second hour of American Journal is on.
you And it's segments like that that go a pretty long way to explaining how we're in the situation that we're in.
Playing on people's groupthink psychology to have the same message coming from a variety of different sources makes it seem true, doesn't it?
And what we're left with is a population that doesn't just not know what's going on.
They believe the polar opposite of reality.
They believe the opposite of what is true.
A total and complete inversion of what they should actually think.
It's... Very annoying.
We'll be back on the other side with Laura Loomer, live from Panama.
She's made some pretty incredible discoveries.
Stay with us. Welcome back, folks.
This is the second hour of American Journal.
I went the whole first hour without reminding you to go to InfoWarsStore.com.
InfoWarsStore.com is the only way that we're able to be here right now, and we won't be here.
If you don't, go to InfoWarsStore.com.
We make it very, very, very easy for you to support us.
Simply go and buy a product, BodyEase, the incredible turmeric supplement.
Go check out what that can do for you from inflammation to...
Your immune system.
It is true. Whole body support with BodEase, the incredibly powerful turmeric supplement.
Infowarsstore.com. TurboForce, 40% off.
Nitric Boost, also 40% off.
And 40% off Winter Sun Plus as well.
Our powerful D3, vitamin D3 product.
And look, folks, even if you don't buy supplements, even if you don't think you need that, first of all, What are you talking about?
Of course you do. Your food is poisoned and or grown in denuded soil.
That means you're not getting the nutrition that you simply need to survive.
So you've got to be supplementing somehow.
But even if I can't convince you of that...
You can at least go buy toothpaste or toothbrushes or just things you are going to buy anyway.
Please, just buy them at Infowarsstore.com.
Why give your money to these globalist corporations that are going to use the profits you provide them to destroy and gut your entire country?
Why not just buy basic necessities at Infowarsstore.com and know that your money is going to this singular outlet for patriotism, justice, the rule of law in the American way.
Infowarsstore.com is the only way that we stay on air, and we thank you so much for your contribution to the war effort.
Speaking of a contributor to the war effort with an outsized influence, it's Laura Loomer.
She's a well-known independent investigative journalist who you can find at Loomer.com and on Substack at Laura Loomer.substack.com.
She's on X as well at Laura Loomer and on YouTube at Laura Loomer.
And Laura, I understand you are now in the jungles of Panama, and you've made some very interesting discoveries.
We have the Infowars story here, but please tell us, what are you finding there in Panama?
laura loomer
Yeah, so thanks so much for having me, Harrison.
That's correct. I've been in Panama for a couple days now, specifically in the Darien Gap invasion, where we're looking at the invasion of our country and places around the world where it's really exciting and places where it's really pivotal to telling the story about Invasion in our country.
And the Darien Gap is one of those places.
And so I was invited by the incredible Michael Yon, who's done amazing work.
He's been on Infowars many times, of course.
All of the work and discoveries he's encountered and found here is Darien Gap as it relates to various NGOs and, you know, facilitate this invasion.
And Michael has...
It's been great to be working with Michael here on the ground in Darien, and I was able to actually go inside the San Vicente Migrant Camp, which recently received a lot of publicity, you know, through Brett Weinstein's interview, Tucker Carlson.
And what I found inside this is, you know, a group of follies.
people from all over the world there, but a group of Somali women wearing Islamic garb and walked over towards them who were sitting there.
And long story short, I started talking to them, asking them where they're from, and they said Somalia.
And one of the guys who's 24 years old spoke English told me that he paid $15,000 to come here and that he's planning on coming to the United States of America.
He wants to go to Minneapolis.
And then he said that it doesn't matter if he's committing a crime or if it's wrong for him to come into the country illegally because bullshit is so bad, right, because he thinks he's a refugee.
And then he also told me that he wants to be just like Ilhan Omar.
He likes Ilhan Omar.
He likes Joe Biden.
He said that he wants Joe Biden to become the next president because Joe Biden is good for the illegal aliens.
And when I said, oh, you think it's better for illegal aliens than Trump, He goes, oh, you can't say illegal alien.
We're refugees. So, you know, we have stressed leftists in America that want to police our language as it relates to talking about immigration and the invasion of our nation.
And it appears that, you know, a lot of these so-called migrants are people in their country of origin or perhaps the NGOs that are facilitating their journey.
harrison smith
Right, so they're literally being trained to say, oh, so, you know, if somebody calls you a legal immigrant, you remind them, actually, I'm an asylum seeker.
You have to stick to that story pretty hard.
And, you know, this article, so the articles at Infowars.com watch Somali illegals declare support for Biden representative Ilhan Omar at Panama migrant staging camp.
And you can see the video that we're showing clips of of Laura Loomer in the Darien Gap talking to these Somali immigrants, not refugees, not asylum seekers.
And it sort of throws you for a loop because first they're like, oh, you know, it seems like they're actually talking about the American dream.
They're saying, you know, Ilhan Omar, she was a refugee, but she went there and now she's a congresswoman.
I also want to go and make something of myself.
And you think like, okay, well that...
That doesn't sound too bad.
You know that America is a land of opportunity.
I mean, this is the classic immigrant story.
But then as you continue the conversation, you realize, oh, you only want that to serve your people, your community.
This isn't, oh, I want to go be a part of the American experiment and contribute to this great country that opened for me.
It's, oh, I want to go there to get power for Somalia and Somalians and for us.
And Joe Biden's good because he's helping us.
It's all this selfishness that, you know, again, at first it's like, oh, well, that sounds Sounds nice.
He's coming to America, the land of opportunity.
I kind of like it. And it's like, oh, no.
You just see a vulnerability that you want to exploit.
laura loomer
And it's also concerning, right?
Because, look, we're told by the media, oh, you know, it's a conservative conspiracy theory that, you know, Muslims are coming across our border and people from terror-type countries are trying to come into this.
our government, right?
They like to say that you're an Islamist if you say that.
But you have these Muslim migrants, and they're not the only ones.
I encountered people from Iran.
I encountered people from Morocco yesterday.
I've encountered people from Afghanistan.
There's a lot of Afghanis here.
You don't know if they're telling the truth about their story or if they're being coached.
And of course, when you think of someone being a Muslim and coming from a territory, you're going to be on high up.
So are jihadists or people that have jihadist tendencies being coached on things to say like, oh, I'm actually a Christian.
I'm not a Muslim.
Oh, I'm trying to escape the Taliban.
There's no way to really invent these people.
And that's what the biggest problem is.
And clearly, they have a desire to change our system of government and our way of life because, well, they're making it, right?
And also, I need people $15,000 because last time I check, the average American doesn't even have $15,000 in their savings account right now.
That's a lot of money.
Let alone, where did Somali migrants get $15,000 in a country where the standard of living is below poverty?
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
Right, exactly. I mean, yeah, $15,000, that's no small chunk of change.
I think, basically, if you paid $15,000 to get wherever you're going, you are almost by definition not an asylum seeker or a refugee.
You're a tourist or a criminal.
And you actually asked them during the video...
laura loomer
Go ahead. I asked him about Sharia, too.
He said, oh, so what do you think about Sharia?
Because in Somalia, they have Sharia.
What was their answer? Countries with the worst human rights violations in the world, and I believe Somalia is also listed as the number one most corrupt country in the world.
And Sharia, he was really shocked.
You should have seen the look on his face when I asked him, because I caught him.
harrison smith
Sharia. Laura, I don't know if you can hear me.
You're kind of dipping in and out here.
We're missing chunks of your story.
I'm not sure if we can reconnect or if it's just from the fact that you're in a Panamanian jungle.
Yeah, you're sort of just fading in and out, and I don't want to miss what you're saying, but we may just have to go to the video of you in Panama here because we're only getting about half of...
Of what you're saying.
But I do want to tell people to go to Infowars.com to find this article.
And one interesting thing is you say, you came because Joe Biden said our borders were open and the migrant was like, yes, Joe Biden invited me here.
What was that interchange like?
Yeah, we may have lost.
unidentified
Or is this the problem? There's been several who I've encountered.
laura loomer
I'm here to talk to a lot of Hispanic invaders and ask them what they think about Joe Biden and what they think about Trump.
And it's always negative for Trump.
And, oh, we love Joe Biden.
I actually have a video that I'll be posting later today of a bunch of Venezuelans swimming in the contaminated water screaming, oh, we love you, Joe Biden, and talking about how they're going to come to America illegally.
harrison smith
It's just completely insane.
How organized is it from what you're seeing?
Are these groups just sort of randomly showing up and sort of following along the person in front of them?
Or are they being instructed?
I mean, we know they're being instructed, but how obvious is it?
laura loomer
It is a well-oiled machine.
And I recorded a lot of videos yesterday.
I'll be releasing these videos.
And I'm not the only person to have documented this, right?
But, look, you go to these migrant camps, and you have what are called pitaguas, these little water boats that are picking up migrants.
There's about a hundred of these boats that go out every single day to the end of the jungle, the Daring Gap, where, after these people complete the journey, they get picked up on the boat.
That's about an hour or so each way, and they get dropped off at...
A place called Bajo Chiquito Migrants Camp, and that's where they're processed by the United Nations Refugee Agency and the Panamanian Border Patrol, the Senate Front.
And then from there, right, they can be transported to other migrant camps in Madarian, like La Casa Blanca or San Vicente, which has now become known as a Chinese camp, right?
And from there, then, if they get $70, the cost of a bus ticket, they will be taken by a bus driver to Costa Rica on a 15-hour bus ride.
And then from there, they can pay another $30 We get to Nicaragua, and then they go to Honduras, and then they go to Mexico, and, of course, they then go to, you know, the Texas border.
So that's how they do it.
And so you see about 100...
I mean, I don't know. It's hard to say how many buses are going in and out, but it's very organized because right at the top of the migrants coming in on boats, right, you have another batch that are being dropped off in the buses, and then they're on their way to Costa Rica, and you just see them all day long.
Yesterday, just to give you an idea of how many people are coming in, It's about 3,000.
Yesterday, according to Centerfront, they said about 3,000 people a day are coming in right now.
So if you do the math, that's over 1 million people per year coming in through one migrant camp.
That's one single point of entry.
And most of them are headed towards the United States.
harrison smith
That's their goal. That's completely insane.
Have you, as an independent journalist, encountered any problems?
Anybody? I mean, it almost seems at this point that they don't even care if people know.
I would think that when they're doing this and they're funneling thousands of people from all over the world, they would be concerned about news of that getting around because it's so obviously an attack on America.
But they don't seem to care that you're there filming.
They're fine with it, aren't they?
laura loomer
They don't seem to care.
The only problem, and I don't even know if I would really call it a problem or of a nuisance that I've run into since I've been here, and I guess we're, for the first time, going to be breaking this live on Infowars because I have not published this anywhere.
It appears as though the New York Times decided to follow me without my knowledge to Panama.
And so, really weird story.
I was in the middle of the migrant camp the other day, and mind you, this is You know, hours and hours away from the airport, you know?
It's not like you can just get access to these camps.
And all of a sudden, some guy approaches me and goes, oh, hi, Laura.
And I'm like, who are you? And he goes, oh, I'm Ken Bessinger with the New York Times.
And I was like, what are you doing here? And he goes, oh, I came here for you.
And so I guess the New York Times followed me here, and they are interested in doing some kind of story.
And it's been very weird because they've been following our group around and You know, they actually, like, showed up to our hotel this morning, and then we ultimately just decided that we were going to confront them with cameras and ask them what they're doing.
And, you know, you know the New York Times, Harrison.
You can't really trust these people.
And I just find it to be really strange that they actually sent somebody from the United States, from the New York Times, to go, you know, follow me to a migrant camp and then literally follow me.
They're not even staying at the hotel that I'm staying at.
And trying to ask questions of me, trying to ask questions of Michael Yan.
You know, it's a little bizarre, in my opinion, but that's probably the...
harrison smith
Yeah, that's more than a little bizarre.
That is incredibly troubling.
So the New York Times, as far as you know, they sent reporters to Panama, to the Derry...
They followed me. They've never sent them to investigate the migrants.
But they sent them to investigate you.
laura loomer
Well, they've had a photographer here, to be fair.
Their photographer lives in Columbia.
But this is the first time that the reporter...
And then we did some research into who this reporter is.
And he works for the New York Times and specializes in targeting right-wing financial networks.
So first it was like, oh, I'm just interested in what you're doing here.
And then, of course, after he followed me to the hotel again this morning while we're having breakfast, getting ready to leave, then it turns—then we, like, ambushed him with the cameras.
And then the conversation turned to, oh, so what's your relationship like with President Trump?
And, oh, you know, how did you get to fly on President Trump's plane with him?
And, oh, who are your owners?
And how do you afford to do the kind of work that you're doing?
And then, like, they started asking me questions about, like, people I've dated in the past.
Like, it was just really strange that they would send somebody to follow me into a migrant camp and then follow me to the hotel and then ask me all these questions about my life.
And it's like, why did you come to Panama to essentially follow me and interrupt a private trip?
But, you know, I answer questions.
It's just a little strange because the reporter lives in Los Angeles.
He doesn't even live in Panama.
And they flew them out here just for me.
And we have them on video saying they flew out here because they wanted to do this story.
It's like you couldn't have called me in the United States.
And I have no idea how they found me.
It's a little bizarre to me that I didn't tell anybody where I was going or which hotel I was staying at.
I didn't tell anybody which camp I was going to be at.
And then somehow he was able to find me and showing up to our hotel.
harrison smith
Okay, yeah, that is extremely creepy.
So we know what that means is that there's going to be some big hit piece, and if it's New York Times spearheading it, they're not going to be the only ones who will contribute to this.
We can probably imagine in like a week or two, there will be some big hit piece about how dangerous it is for right-wingers to be going down to Darien Gap because obviously, Laura, you're a terrorist who's just trying to harm these poor, innocent children that are crossing the border.
I mean, if you look at the New York Times coverage of the Darien Gap in the past.
It is incredibly sympathetic.
I mean, everything they say about it is they're mad that people are exploiting the migrants because it's so expensive to come to America.
They talk about a girl whose mother died there, and it's this very sympathetic, tear-jerking article about this poor little girl in the migrant camp as if she's representative when in reality we know it's mostly men and from all over the world.
What that means to me is that the New York Times, probably along with a couple other major outlets, mainstream outlets, are gearing up to launch a media attack against people going down to the Darien Gap and exposing what's happening.
Hold on, we lost you there, Laura.
You dropped out. I'm not sure if you can hear me, but whenever you get back.
I hear you now.
unidentified
Go ahead. This is Michael in the backseat with Laura.
harrison smith
Michael Yon. I mean, that's pretty epic.
Sorry. No, you're sort of dropping in and out.
I can hear you for a second, and then you go away.
I heard something was epic. You're better now.
Something was epic, I heard.
I hear you now, yep. This is Michael Yon.
unidentified
I'm in the backseat with Laura.
We're out in the jungle. And what's epic is that some people have stalkers, but Laura Loomer has the New York Times stalking her all the way from California to Darien Gap.
harrison smith
That's pretty uncommon. That is wild.
That really is wild.
So again, what do you think the story's going to say, Laura?
I mean, this is sort of an opportunity to head them off at the pass.
This is an information war, and it seems like they're planning to open a new front here.
laura loomer
I don't know. I mean, like, obviously I know from this guy's background that it's going to be some kind of story focused on trying to find out, like, how I make a living or who's financing me.
I literally have a public give, send, go that people can support right now pinned at the top of my X account.
I'm not a multimillionaire.
And I said, you should know that I don't work for Trump.
Why are you asking me all these personal questions?
I said, unlike Maggie Haberman and people who have worked for Trump in the past who have been disloyal and they leaked, I don't leak.
I'm not going to tell you, like, the private contents of my conversations with President Trump.
It's totally inappropriate. And they just kept on pushing.
And it's like, I'm a loyal person.
I don't work for President Trump.
But just the idea that they think that even if I wasn't, that I would be leaking my conversations and very intrusive personal conversations about how I make a living.
Also, too, I don't understand why they would come up and ask me about Oh, are you dating this person?
Or, you know, going back and trying to, like, talk about people who, like, volunteered on my congressional campaign.
It's very weird. But Michael's here, and he thought it was very weird, too, the fact that—and I'm not exaggerating this at all.
We were literally in a migrant's camp, and The New York Times just popped out of nowhere, and they were like, oh, we're here for you.
And we were like, oh, are they trying to do a hit piece on Michael?
And then finally today, when they followed us again to our hotel and were trying to sit with us at our breakfast table, we just decided to ambush them with a million cameras and say, what are you doing here?
harrison smith
Well, you know, what this means is they're responding to InfoWars as well as other outlets leading the charge on this and actually going down and exposing what's happening in the Darien Gap.
They'll report it occasionally. They'll mention that the Darien Gap exists and they'll paint a sympathetic picture of the people passing through.
So they'll mention it. What they really don't like is people like yourself and Michael Jan going there, calling in live into InfoWars, exposing this.
I know, I mean, Michael Jan's been a regular fixture on Alex's show giving updates to this.
So it seems like The people at the New York Times and other big media outlets are sitting there going, okay, these guys are getting this story out and they're getting firsthand footage.
We have to do something to combat that and to counter that.
So, I mean, I see this as a victory.
laura loomer
I think that Yeah, I think they're going to try to do some kind of a hit piece about, oh, meet the white supremacists, like pro-Trump conservatives that are, you know, sowing discord in the Darien Gap with migrants.
And they'll probably get some migrants to tell some fake story and make up a lie about how we attack them.
I noticed, like, one of the questions that the guy asked me as I was about to leave today was, Oh, like, you know, how do you know this person that made white supremacist comments online?
Like, it's just like, are you serious?
Like, they cannot help themselves.
It's just very bizarre that they're so desperate that they are literally sending somebody to, I would say, stalk me in Panama, okay, another country, follow me to my hotel, and do a story when they could have easily just called me.
And he goes, oh, well, I was going to follow you to South Carolina because I thought you were going to be in South Carolina reporting on the Trump primary.
But then I saw you were not going to go to South Carolina, so I decided to send to Panama.
And I'm like, you decided to not even call me or anything?
How did you find out where I was staying?
How did you find out where I was going to be?
harrison smith
I didn't tell anybody. That is so bizarre.
Yeah, tell them you're going to Antarctica next.
Send them somewhere far away.
I mean, you say it's bizarre, but it's not bizarre, is it, Laura?
It's actually exactly what you would expect them to do.
We're exposing the Darien Gap.
We're exposing what's happening south of the border.
They're in favor of what's happening and don't want it exposed, so of course they're going to follow you.
Of course they're going to try to intimidate you or threaten you in a quiet way.
I don't see this as bizarre, Laura.
I see this as perfectly predictable, actually.
It's the right thing for them to do.
laura loomer
I want to give you another breaking scoop here while we're live on air, too.
I honestly just think that with all the layoffs in the media, these people are just very jealous of independent journalists who are successful.
And while we were able to get access and the Senate Front Border Patrol respected us enough to give us Whoa, that's very interesting. It does.
harrison smith
Laura, we gotta go to commercial break, but stay safe and keep up the great work, folks.
You can follow Laura on InfoWars, Loomerd.com, Laura Loomer on X, Laura Loomerd on YouTube, and Laura Loomerd.substack.com.
Keep up the great work, Laura.
Can't wait to hear more. We'll be right back, folks.
All right, welcome back, folks.
Incredible stuff from Laura Loomer, live from the Dairy and Gap.
Breaking the story of a New York Times stalker following her all the way to Panama.
Maybe I shouldn't call it a victory.
It's nice to have them on the defense.
And they know that they can't See, this is the importance of things like Infowars and alternative media.
When the media is consolidated and just a few companies that are highly controlled and restricted to what they're able to talk about, then the best way to get away with stuff is to just not talk about it.
If it was only the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal and You know, CNN, who people got their news from, if that was the only option, then they would just ignore the Darien Gap and no one would ever know about it or hear about it or have any awareness that this was going on.
That's the best option when you have a monopoly on information is silence.
But once we come into the equation, once we start telling the truth about these things, once we start doing independent on-the-ground reporting of what's going on, circumventing the mainstream censorship apparatus, silence is no longer the best option.
Now they have to go on the offensive, or they have to make defensive maneuvers to cover what's happening in a way that contradicts or counteracts our coverage.
So again, if it was just them, they would just ignore it.
They would be silent about it. We'd never hear about it.
Nobody would ever know. Because InfoWars has been pounding this story out, because Michael Yawn has been such a regular fixture on the Alex Jones show, because more people are seeing him and seeing other examples, Muckraker and others, again, friends of the show, going there and doing it.
And then other people are picking up their cameras and going and doing it.
More independent journalists are going and doing it.
Silence is no longer a viable strategy for Allowing this to continue.
Now, if they want that to continue, they have to attack us.
They have to claim that what we're doing is some sort of fundraising effort because we don't actually care about the border.
We just hate...
Panama, so we're going to whatever, I don't know what exact strategy they're going to pursue in this, but this is the reality of having a robust alternative media, is that they can no longer wield silence as a weapon to manipulate the masses.
They have to address us.
They have to address the issue somehow, and they'll do it dishonestly, and they'll convince a lot of people with their coverage.
Make no mistake of that.
But it's evidence that what we're doing is effective.
And I'll just say on a personal note, I know I mention this just about every time we talk to Laura Loomer, but it was such a revelatory thing to me.
It was such a revelation to me going and covering Laura Loomer's protest at Twitter in New York City and seeing the behind the scenes.
Because I know Laura Loomer, she's one of these people that people have very strong feelings about in one way or the other.
And some people think, well, you know, how is she always...
Why does she get so much attention?
She must be controlled or something.
I'm telling you from personal experience, seeing it with my own eyes, Laura's just a powerhouse.
She just does what she wants to do, and she forces people to pay attention.
She does things and finds things out and brings receipts and holds protest with a team of two other people that are just like...
College dudes that are helping her out for an afternoon.
I mean, there's no massive infrastructure behind Laura.
It's literally just her going out and doing things.
And practically every time we talk to her, she breaks some massive story.
I think that's a pretty big deal, the revelation that the New York Times is stalking independent reporters across country lines all the way to Panama and Not covering the Darien Gap, but instead badgering Laura Loomer about her dating past.
I mean, this shows desperation.
That is a...
It should be a mark of honor that they feel so threatened by what Laura's up to.
So, again, just incredible stuff.
While we're on the topic, let's go ahead and get into more migrant stories, migration stories.
Because there are a lot of them.
There's a lot of videos. Finally, it seems as though the mainstream media argument of opposing migrants is racist is finally really crumbling.
And thanks in no small part to the busing program, busing people to places like Chicago and New York, this has been incredibly effective.
I'll be the first to admit, I did not like the busing strategy at first.
It still kind of rubs me the wrong way.
I don't like that we're taking people who just crossed the border and sending them thousands of miles into the country to our major cities.
But it is having an effect, and it's having a powerful effect.
So let's go now to clip number 11.
Here's a black man from Chicago.
letting his feelings be known to the city that is so blithely injecting tens of thousands of illegal immigrants into the most underrepresented neighborhoods in the city.
unidentified
Let's watch. From August of last year to December of this year, they will spend $252 million on the migrants.
$252 million.
17,000 migrants come into this city.
And this is Chicago. If we just break that in half and they become families, you got 8,500 families.
Hispanics have 3.5 children.
I'm submitting to you, in one generation, just one generation, the black vote will be null.
They will have an additional 24,000 people on the voting rolls, along with the Hispanic population already here.
They're playing chess, and you all are playing chess.
You are damning our youth, our next generation, to poverty by you all doing these political speeches.
One generation, our youth, our vote will be null in all these six sanctuary cities.
And what are you going to do about that?
harrison smith
And this is why we've said forever that nationalism really is the answer to all these problems.
Nationalism. If you're an American citizen, you're in the club.
If you're not, you're not.
And we have to reinforce that.
I really hope that it's breaking through, not just the revelation that migrants are damaging and bad for the city, and I hope it's not some sort of ethnocentric thing that this black guy's like, just solely thinking about black people.
It's bad for all Americans, and it should have been obvious from the very beginning, and I hope it gets through to like, okay, maybe the Trump supporters had a point.
Maybe I should stop voting for the people that are doing this to me on purpose, constantly.
I really hope that these sorts of revelations that we're seeing more and more of become reflected in the electoral reality moving forward.
Let's go now quickly to clip number 13.
Here's what's happening in Boston.
unidentified
It's been two weeks since the Melnea Cash Recreational Community Center in Roxbury was converted into an emergency shelter for migrant families.
Hundreds of beds now cover the indoor track and soccer fields where neighborhood children like 12-year-old Jeremiah Rodriguez thought he had baseball practice this weekend.
We usually practice. And what happened when you went here today?
They were closed. Closed to the public as dozens of families are now living in the shelter who were at one point sleeping in Logan Airport as the state shelter system is stretched to the limit.
Overall, it has been putting some pressure on the capacity of our system.
It's okay to help out.
I don't think that's the play to do it because kids and family go and enjoy.
As a community, voicing our opinion and our concerns for the youth center and the elderly programs going down there, and it just seemed like our voices weren't heard.
In an effort to mobilize the community, activist Clifton Braithwaite held a neighborhood meeting at 1102 Blue Community Center and Event Space in Roxbury, where folks voiced their concerns.
We wanted to give a clear message that you're taking away resources from not only from Boston or Massachusetts for illegal immigrants who pay nothing to our taxes.
The recreational center is a vital resource for youth and adult programs.
harrison smith
You see that man who's wearing an American flag?
Sweatshirt, I'm telling you folks, nationalism is the answer.
That's why they want to treat it as evil.
That's why they want to treat nationalism itself as something abhorrent.
That's why they push globalism.
This is the ultimate conflict.
Do you care about the people in your nation, or do you see those people as something to exploit and destroy in your pursuit of some other goal?
We need to come together as Americans, as separate and distinct from everyone who's, you know, not American.
Welcome back, folks. We're going to continue on the topic of migrants for the time being.
We still have a lot of other stuff to cover today, and this will sort of lead into some of those other stories.
First, from the New York Post, eagle-eyed residents reveal sophisticated migrant smuggling operation at the northern U.S. border.
Yes, folks, it's getting so bad that people are really just trying to skip the line.
By going north, unsettling post footage and interviews with U.S. residents along the Canadian border offers a rare glimpse into the thriving migrant smuggling operation that is taking hold up north in addition to the debacle down south.
Residents of bucolic Swanton, Vermont, a town of about 6,500 people located just across Lake Champlain from New York and about a 10-minute drive from the Canadian border, have been getting a troubling first-hand look at the U.S.'s northern illegal migrant crisis.
Wait, I think I'm coming up with a solution.
Wait, I think I have an idea.
You're telling me that these woods are a wonderful playground for hunters, but they're also the point of an invasion?
Hold on. I think I see a solution to our problems.
It shouldn't have to go this far, folks.
But it is. Local Chris Feely, 52, recently said, I've got the Border Patrol guys on speed dial.
So I guess they can come, you know, pick them up and give them their new prepaid credit cards or something.
According to the Customs and Border Protection numbers...
The amount of migrants illegally entering the United States at the northern border last year topped 12,200, a 240% spike from 2022.
Of those, 70% of the illegal crossings took place along a 295-mile Swanton sector, which includes upstate New York, New Hampshire, and Vermont.
Illegal crossings at the U.S. southern border dwarfed those figures, with 2.4 million migrants encountered recorded there.
In 2023, capping off the year with a record setting 276,000 encounters in December.
Which I don't believe that numbers as the numbers reported for 2024 as of about a week into February was 988,000.
So we're really averaging a little under a million a month for crossing at the southern border with as well thousands or tens of thousands now crossing at the northern border.
Which is interesting. But things are getting absolutely insane.
Both these videos came out over the weekend.
The first is that aside from being given the right to vote in certain places, as well as being allowed to join the police force and actually carry a weapon and arrest American citizens on American soil as an illegal migrant, a position...
Offered to them by various cities in the United States.
So in addition to being police officers or voting in our elections, we now have foreigners.
That's the correct way to think about this.
Not Americans. Foreign actors who are from and live and enjoy the protection of a foreign government.
We now have a non-American citizen, a Chinese national citizen, Let's go to clip number one.
Her name is Kelly Wong.
She's not an American citizen.
unidentified
Let's watch. I thought this was translated.
harrison smith
Let me translate. The stupid Americans just let us come right in.
Now I hold a position of power in an American city.
I can make it easier for our fellow countrymen to come over.
And likewise, they'll be treated as if they're refugees and asylum seekers by these stupid, moronic Americans who were invading by the tune of tens of thousands per month.
The relentless tide will never stop.
We will soon overwhelm these stupid Americans who instead of defending themselves against us are opening the door and inviting us in.
unidentified
It's like they don't even need a big wooden horse.
harrison smith
They just are here.
Kelly Wong, I believe is now a city council person in San Francisco, if I'm not mistaken.
Literally a Chinese citizen.
Never renounced her citizenship to China.
Never gone through the process of becoming an American citizen.
Breaking barriers.
Non-citizen Kelly Wong made a city council person in China.
Yeah, the first non-US citizen appointed to San Francisco Election Commission, by the way.
Oh, by the way, she's now been appointed to the Election Commission.
unidentified
I mean, it's...
harrison smith
What? Completely insane.
It's completely insane. So we now have a Chinese national on the Election Commission in the city of San Francisco.
A non-American citizen now has authority over American elections.
Brought to you by the same political party that tells you if you support Donald Trump, you're a traitor to this great nation.
These people despise America.
They despise America.
It shouldn't be that hard to understand.
But of course, it's not just America where this is happening.
This is a phenomenon in white countries across the globe.
In Britain, it's really mounted to absurd and, again, frankly, horrifying degrees.
We've already seen in America the way that People in Massachusetts and New York are being asked to open their homes to illegal migrants because the tens of thousands of migrants have overwhelmed the city's capability to house and feed them.
And so people are being paid thousands of dollars to essentially have live and help in endangered servitudes to illegal migrants.
In Britain, they're taking it one step further.
Let's go to clip number two.
This British woman received a letter from the—here's how this works.
She received a letter from the government offering to buy her house in order to house migrants with the caveat that if she refuses to buy, then it may just be an aspect of—or a matter for eminent domain, and they'll just seize her house from her, whether she likes it or not. So we'd like to buy your house.
And if you say no, then we'll just take it.
Would you like to accept our offer?
This is what's happening in the UK to house illegal migrants.
British people are being forced to sell their homes.
unidentified
Let's watch. So this letter was from the council and you got this on the 12th of January.
You moved in in November, didn't you?
Yeah. And you got this letter.
Just spell out what this letter says.
That letter says that they, because the property is derelict, That they can compulsory purchase it.
If there's any repairs to be done in it, they could take it off the price of the property.
And these properties are for migrants.
That's what they want to be meant for.
Extraordinary, isn't it? And how did you feel when you got a letter?
You moved into your new wonderful home, you settled down, law-abiding citizens, and you get a compulsory purchase order from the council Accusing you of occupying a derelict home, how did you feel when you got this?
Occupying 200,000 for it, we didn't feel very well.
No. It must have been one hell of a shock, mustn't it?
It's for the immigrant and not the indigenous population.
Well, veterans are sleeping rough.
16,000 veterans.
In terrible weather. Absolutely. They can't get put in hotels or on a baby stuck home.
There is a daylight charity in Wellingborough which looks after homeless people who are sleeping rough and they spend £630 per annum per head Illegal migrants get paid 50,000 and they get spent on them 50,000 pounds per annum per head and here we have the evidence of it in this letter.
They wanted your lovely new home.
harrison smith
Unbelievable. Compulsory purchase order.
Now since then, the UK government has said, oh no, that was a mistake.
No, that was an accident.
No, that was a little mix-up.
We didn't mean to write an article or write a memo for you and go through the bureaucratic process of assigning your domicile as being derelict and writing up a compulsory purchase order.
That was all a big accident.
That was all a big oopsies.
Our mistake, of course, as Alex Jones points out on Twitter...
Yeah, this has been happening actually for decades.
This has been going on. We've actually covered story after story about this.
And they're only saying it was a mistake now that they've been caught doing this.
So, I mean, when the government is forcing out its own citizens, forcing them to sell their house, claiming it's derelict, but then saying they want to buy it to house migrants, like that doesn't make any sense.
If it's derelict, you can't house migrants there.
Are we gonna stand for this?
I mean, how long are we gonna take this?
How long before nationalism reasserts itself and the government works for the people rather than exclusively against the people?
unidentified
2008. Something unbelievable happened for us in the FBI. We were getting lots of rumors about this high-level asset that worked for several intelligence agencies at the same time.
He worked for the Saudi Intelligence Service.
He worked for the CIA. And he was being developed as a political asset in Chicago, Illinois.
He was not even a United States citizen.
But it was said that he was a student visa.
And that he was a national from another country.
In 2008, everyone in the intelligence structure found out who he was.
It was this individual who became president in 2008 of the United States.
When they ran him for president, the cabal, basically, this was the culmination of so many of their plans for so many years.
His mission was to destroy the United States from within, one institution at a time.
harrison smith
They spied on my campaign, Leslie.
unidentified
There's no real evidence of that.
Of course there is. It's all over the place.
harrison smith
Leslie, they spied on my campaign and they got caught.
unidentified
Can I say something? You know, this is 60 Minutes.
And we can't put on things we can't verify.
owen shroyer
You won't put it on because it's bad for Biden.
unidentified
We can't put on things we can't verify.
harrison smith
Leslie, they spied on my campaign.
unidentified
Well, we can't verify that.
owen shroyer
It's been totally verified. No.
unidentified
GCHQ has probably the most invasive network intercept program anywhere in the world.
And it's the world's first full take, they call it.
And that means content in addition to metadata on everything.
jon bowne
Top Secret 2016 United Kingdom Government Communications Headquarters document signed off by GCHQ Director Robert Hennigan under the umbrella of New World Order loon Boris Johnson details an operation known as Project Folsom.
Boldly stating...
28th of August 2016, GCHQ CSO filed for permission to execute Project Folsom at the request of the U.S. President, Barack Obama, seeking intelligence gathering into the Trump Organization and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. Activities include foreign and U.S. domestic signals collection in regards to communications with Russian hostile actors.
II, IOCCO approved Folsom on 15th of September 2016, allowing 90 days of initial signet gathering with the potential for renewal, should the situation allow.
Three, since Folsom's start, a clear pattern of actionable leads have accrued, both from the Trump campaign itself, from former MI5 agent Michael Steele, and from others.
Four, U.S. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice has requested that we continue our surveillance during the transition period.
As internal U.S. intelligence is potentially compromised by the incoming Trump administration, the verification of the document is still in question.
However, General Flynn has referenced the document several times for years.
unidentified
The U.S. intelligence community asked foreign spy agencies to surveil 26 associates of Donald Trump in the run-up to the 2016 election.
The U.K.'s Government Communication Headquarters, which is an intelligence gathering apparatus, also known as GCHQ, was making contacts with Trump's associates as early as March of 2016, according to the report.
A GCHQ spokesman denied the report, calling it nonsense.
The journalists say that intelligence related to the surveillance effort is housed in a 10-inch binder, which Trump, near the end of his presidency, ordered to be declassified.
michael shellenberger
But obviously, if this binder contains what we have been told that it contains, which may include raw intelligence, information showing that the US government, the CIA and the intelligence community of the US government, If the FBI initiated the Russia collusion hoax, that it did not occur in the way that the official story, including the Durham investigation, had portrayed it, then that's extremely serious information.
And it may be, if the FBI then went to go get it in order to continue the cover-up of this information, that obviously adds an even more dramatic wrinkle to this.
jon bowne
Barack Obama, hell-bent on maintaining his executive power, in league with global intelligence agencies, conspired to commit treason On a scale that makes Watergate look like a caveman having a picnic.
John Bowne reporting.
unidentified
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
It's a... It's a cliche at this point.
When people say, you shouldn't just read the headlines.
Everybody just reads the headlines and they get the wrong idea.
Which for the most part is true.
For most normal people, they read the headlines.
The headlines are deliberately designed to mislead and leave you with the wrong impression.
Again, as we say on this show, the media's job is to tell you the truth but leave you believing a lie.
And the reality is that with enough discernment, with a keen enough insight...
All you really have to read is the headline.
When you understand that the headlines are written by despicable liars who hate you, when you understand their cultural atmosphere in which they operate, it is actually kind of easy to determine exactly what happened from the headline.
Not by trusting the headline, but by deconstructing the headline point by point and accepting some, at this point, well-established biases in the mainstream media.
One example of this would be the day after the Super Bowl shooting, Super Bowl parade shooting in Kansas City.
The headlines read something like, Mass shooting at Super Bowl Parade, one dead, 22 wounded, two suspects in custody.
Now, from that headline alone, you don't get a ton of information, okay?
There was a shooting, 22 people got hit, one got killed.
Doesn't tell you much else.
But from that, we can derive the truth, and we did.
We did derive the truth.
We reported it here. You saw it live if you were watching.
Where we speculated and said, okay, what that means is, for one thing, the suspects have been detained, but their identities are not being reported.
Okay, so that means that they're not white.
Okay, because if they're white, it gets reported.
If they're not, it's not.
So the lack of information can tell you that.
And this is information that isn't even in the body of the text.
So not only can you read the headline...
And understand the reality of what's happening.
You can actually glean truths that aren't even in the article itself.
So because they don't mention the race, despite the suspects being in custody, because there's no picture of the suspects, despite them being in custody, we know that they weren't white.
Because 22 people were injured and only one killed, we know this wasn't a targeted mass shooting with an attempt to cause as many victims as possible.
Likely, what it was, and this is what we reported on the day with just that information, just the numbers, We said, okay, this is probably black guys.
It's probably two black guys. They're probably in a fight with each other or other people.
They're firing at each other, but essentially firing randomly into the crowd, hitting innocent people all around them.
And we turned out to be exactly right.
The next day reported that was exactly what happened.
Now we have even more information and more videos.
It was in fact a scuffle, a fight where a couple of guys were arguing.
They pulled out guns and started shooting in the middle of a giant crowd.
So in a way, by understanding the innate biases of the people writing the headlines, understanding the deception techniques that are used to mislead people by presenting incomplete facts, we can actually understand everything that there is to know, even beyond the text of the article.
This is almost a superpower that we have here, and we're never wrong.
It's pretty incredible. It's pretty incredible how we are never, ever, ever wrong about this stuff.
And we tell you when we're speculating.
It doesn't matter because we're right anyway.
But this is because we have a clear-eyed...
Full understanding of the reality of the world that we live in and how utterly and completely divorced from that reality most mainstream media consumers exist in.
I have a reason to tell you about this.
The article from the New York Post, the headline...
From yesterday, Minnesota gunman dead after killing two cops and paramedic who tried to help them during hours-long standoff.
So killed two cops, paramedic tried to help, killed him to three upstanding, selfless, self-sacrificing members of the community murdered by a psychopath.
Again, I know what happens, so I'm not going to try to break down this headline.
I think everybody out there can sort of understand where this is going.
Unless, of course, you live in the upside-down world of liberalism.
Unless you see the world through the inversion lenses of leftist understanding.
In which case, you are not just wrong about your assumptions, You are the opposite of right.
You are diametrically opposed to the truth.
Your reality isn't just out of focus.
It is completely and utterly inverted.
And I'll show you what I mean.
Clip number 12. There's a guy on TikTok, a leftist activist who looks like a brown version of Carrot Top.
Potato top? I don't know what you'd call that.
He's a repulsive man, and he makes some assumptions about the shooting before the identity of the suspect was known that, again, illustrate just how utterly backwards their entire understanding of anything is.
Okay, so let's go now to clip number 12.
Let's hear how a leftist thinks the world operates.
unidentified
Okay. This morning in Burnsville, Minnesota, two police officers and a firefighter were shot and killed when they responded to a domestic dispute call.
It's been over 14 hours since the shooting occurred, and they have not released the identity of the man.
2023 was the most deadly year at the hands of police with 1,348 people reportedly being killed by the police.
Meanwhile, 134 police were killed in the line of duty.
So my question to you is, are they withholding the identity of the person to protect them because they're white?
Or is it a black person and this is just a one-off time that they're not incriminating the person?
Also, is it wrong that I don't feel bad that the police were killed, but I do feel bad the firefighter was killed?
Let me hear your thoughts in the comments below.
harrison smith
Yeah, I'll tell you my comments.
You clown. You utter clown.
I mean, where do you even begin?
I guess we'll begin with just how obviously wrong you are.
We do now have the suspect.
We have a picture of him here.
He is, in fact, a black man.
He is, in fact, a black man.
Again, it's not that they just get things wrong.
It's that their belief system is utterly diametrically opposed to reality.
The reality is that The government, the media, the leftists who run our country are desperate to conceal the reality behind black crime statistics.
They're desperate to avoid portraying black people as criminals.
So they actually go so far as places like San Francisco won't even publish the picture of suspects of crimes.
Because they say it can perpetuate racial stereotypes.
So because criminals whose wanted pictures are supposed to be spread to the people so they can be caught and apprehended and the crimes can be punished, because they're overwhelmingly non-white, they say posting their pictures is racist.
So the reality is that if it's a white guy committing a crime, that aspect of his identity becomes Foremost and in front of everything else.
That becomes the most important thing. White man kills black person.
White man, you know, shoots up school.
Whatever it is. That's always the number one aspect and you're going to instantly know the name and race of a white person committing a crime.
It's when black people commit crimes or mass shootings or whatever that that information is concealed.
This is what I mean by just These wet dog looking morons on TikTok who actually think, he sincerely thinks that the race, the identity of the person committed this crime was hidden to protect white people.
Will it ever become clear to these people that it's the opposite that happens?
That what they believe is an inversion of reality?
The shooter who killed two officers and a paramedic in Burnsville, Minnesota, has reportedly been identified as Shannon Cortez Gooden.
Gooden petitioned to have his gun rights restored after a 2008 felony assault conviction.
Watch how fast the story disappears.
So not only was it a black guy who killed the police, it was a black guy who should not have been allowed guns.
That petition was denied.
He was not legally allowed to own a gun.
So you've got a black guy killing cops with an illegal gun, and the response from the left, not just the mainstream media, but Curly Joe over there as well, is to say it's probably a white guy and we need to get more gun control.
Now he points out that 2023 was the deadliest year on record for police shootings, and I wonder if that has anything to do with this chart, This is the chart of murders in Portland from 2000 to 2022, posted by Indwokeness, who says, let's defund the police, decriminalize drugs, and stop putting people in jail.
What's the worst that can happen?
And what you see is that a fairly steady line from 2000 all the way up to 2019 suddenly takes off like a rocket and explodes off of the top of the chart.
So the 2000 to 2019 average was around 23 murders a year in Portland.
As of 2020, 2021, 2022, you have 57, 90, and 97 murders, respectively.
So maybe that has to do with the number of police murders.
Maybe it's because murder itself has skyrocketed across the board because of the Defund the Police program that was implemented, again, on these same lines of delusion.
And that's the real dangerous part.
Not only do these people believe the opposite of the truth, They actually make policy based off of that belief, and it makes everything worse.
And instead of having a modicum of humility or understanding or intelligence or logic or pattern recognition capability, they double down on whatever they believe.
Despite their solutions to the so-called problems making everything worse, they just double down over and over again.
So maybe police killed more people Because they were underfunded.
Because the good police left and went to private security.
And so the police had to lower their standards in order to recruit people.
Because police were so demonized in 2020.
Because you told black people that any interaction with the police will end in their murder.
And so they're more incentivized to fight back.
Thinking that if I just surrender, I'll be killed.
So I better fight.
Maybe it's because you people made absolutely everything worse across the board.
Murder skyrocketed.
Violent crime skyrocketed.
You changed the law or put judges into place and DAs into place who refused to prosecute criminals.
So what could have been confronted at a low-level crime was allowed to continue to accelerate and get worse until eventually they were murdering people and police had to be called and They had been injected with this idea that police will kill them, so they have to kill them first.
So it became an us versus them shootout.
I just, you know, I understand you get more flies with honey than vinegar.
I understand that you can convince more people with compassion than...
Criticism. But these people are dangerously stupid.
They're dangerously misinformed.
They're voting and advocating and organizing and electing people and making policy off of an inverted view of the world.
A completely inside-out, upside-down, nonsensical, utterly baseless Hugely off-target view of the world.
So I don't have any hope of convincing these people.
This man said he's happy the police died.
Do you want to hear what the story was?
Do you want to hear what these police did?
Do you want to put yourself in the mindset of these police officers, these three white guys, the two police officers and the paramedic or fireman that were killed, murdered by a repeat criminal who wasn't legally allowed to have a gun and probably shouldn't have been on the street in the first place?
Do you want to have some iota of empathy for the people killed doing a job that nobody should even have to do but that they were willing to do?
Minnesota gunman dead after killing two cops and paramedic who tried to help them during hours-long standoff.
Again, the story from New York Post.
They, again, don't mention the suspect or his race because, again, it's inconvenient.
Allowing this concept to perpetuate, like we just saw on display from that TikToker, who literally said, is the guy white?
And so they're therefore hiding his identity to protect him.
Just literally the opposite of the truth, which is why headlines are able to trick them.
Because they have assumptions, pre-ordained, pre-established mindsets that fire is cold and the sky is red.
I mean, they could not be more wrong.
A fourth officer was actually injured in the shooting, but was being treated for non-life-threatening injuries, police said.
Authorities had responded to a domestic abuse call about a man who had barricaded himself inside his home with his family, a woman and seven children, ages 2 to 15, around 1.50 a.m., police said.
The call had been made by a resident inside the home.
So just put yourself in the position of Paul Elmstrand or Michael...
Rouge or Ruge, and Adam Finseth, these three victims.
Imagine it is the early hours of the morning.
You've probably been on patrol for hours.
It's nearing 2 a.m., and you get a call of a domestic disturbance that you're asked to go deal with.
You show up to find out that a man...
He's holding seven children from the age of 2 to 15 hostage inside his home with a gun.
And in an attempt to rescue those children, you are then murdered by the man with the gun.
And then some poodle on TikTok gets up and says, basically, you're the bad guy because you're the police.
And you were probably hoping to reinforce white supremacy.
When police arrived, it was determined the man had multiple firearms inside, with officers at the scene describing him as dangerous and refusing to come out.
After about four hours of negotiation with the man, gunfire erupted and two officers dropped, with one being hit while inside the home.
When Finseth tried to approach to rescue them, he was also gunned down.
About an hour later, another shot was heard from inside the house, and it was learned the suspect had taken his own life, reports said.
We have a caller calling from inside saying the dad is down.
Dispatcher said around 6.55 a.m.
according to the Tribune, he is not breathing.
He is in the bedroom.
He just shot himself in the head.
They confirmed he was dead around 8 a.m.
The family was removed safely from the home shortly after and police began searching the site.
The individual had several guns and large amounts of ammunition and shot at police officers from multiple positions within the home across the first and second floors.
Evans noted, the superintendent of the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in Minnesota, noted there had been not many calls from this house for service at all before the shootout and said investigators are still looking into everything surrounding the family and home.
Heavy.com has an even more in-depth article about this guy.
Apparently it was Alpha News that first identified this guy.
But his identity was later confirmed by an account that reports Minnesota News on X who said they had it confirmed from different sources that this was the man.
The X page, Crime Watch MPLS, also reported that Gooden was the deceased gunman.
Quote, we've received the same info from other sources.
Information during the Burnsville standoff this morning also indicated that Shannon was wanted or was to be arrested for second-degree criminal sexual conduct.
The site wrote on X, that information has not been verified by authorities either.
But what has been identified...
Is that Shannon Gooden apparently filed a petition in 2020 seeking to have his gun rights restored.
In his restoration of firearm rights petition he filed to request to be able to carry a gun in 2020 in the county of Dakota.
It says that he requests the court restore his gun rights.
The motion is made on the grounds that Mr.
Gooden has been released from physical confinement and that there is good cause for the court to grant his motion.
The request was denied according to Minnesota court records.
According to the document, they basically were like, no, but he wants his gun back.
The action arose out of a case from 2008 in which Mr.
Gooden was convicted of assault in the second degree with a dangerous weapon in Minnesota.
His Minnesota court history includes a 2022 child support case and civil actions against him, the assault with a dangerous weapon conviction.
That case says a charge of terroristic threats was dismissed.
Okay, so you've got a...
Black felon with an illegally owned gun holding seven children hostage in the middle of the night in Minnesota.
You have two hero police officers putting their own lives on the line to rescue the children from the deranged madman and his illegal weapons.
They are gunned down.
A firefighter or paramedic goes to attempt to rescue them.
He himself is gunned down.
And in response... Curly Joe on TikTok says police deserved it.
They're racist and the media is not reporting the race or identity of the killer to protect white people.
And he laments the number of police killings that occurred in 2023, despite the fact that those killings came about as a direct result of Of the policies that he and his ilk supported in 2020.
That in 2020 there was a massive, nationwide, hugely destructive and influential movement all predicated on lowering police murders and everything they did in every single instance in fact maximized the number of police murders that took place.
As well as skyrocketed through the roof, multiplying by three times in Portland alone, the number of murders that occurred outright between citizens.
No introspection, no second guessing, no humility, no revelation that, oh my God, everything I believe is wrong, everything I advocate makes everything worse, everything I think I'm championing, I am in fact destroying wholesale because of my ceaseless Hubristic overconfidence in my own intelligence or my blatant dishonesty and misunderstanding purposefully of the reality of our situation.
These people are a menace.
Their policies do the opposite of what they believe because they're predicated on lies that are the inversion of truth.
God help us all is all I have to say because these people will never learn.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Think about the documents that we reference all the time, Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States.
How obvious it is from just the first words of these documents, what is intended for the creation of our government, why it was created, what the purpose of it is.
We sell shirts and hats and things that say, we the people.
We the people.
Power in the people.
It's a beautiful thing. The Democrats will take that and they feel equally as represented by that statement.
They'll go give speeches.
You can just hear Kamala Harris, we the people.
We meaning us and the people meeting us.
You can see her saying something similar.
But they're missing the second part of that sentence, which is of the United States.
We the people of the United States.
Nationalism is the answer.
Benefiting, prioritizing, serving the people of the United States is the purview of the government.
That's what the government was enshrined for.
Not everybody else, not everybody in the world gets a slice of the pie.
It's we, the people of the United States, and our posterity, by the way, meaning our descendants, what comes after us for our people in the United States.
It's just a convenient thing that gets left out of most leftist understanding.
They get about halfway, and then they leave off, finishing the sentence, which leaves them with, again, a belief that is diametrically opposed to what they think To the thing that they are predicating their belief on.
So this seems to have been utterly inverted in the modern age to where everything that our government, by the people, for the people of the United States, everything they do is for the benefit of everybody other than we the people.
It's for them the people.
Those people. Not Americans.
People overseas. People who are dual citizens.
People who... Don't belong here, yet have broken their way in, or simply live on the other side of the world and happen to live on what the American regime considers a convenient battlefield.
Let's go to clip number six here, and actually before we do that, I posted on X over the weekend just a very simple breakdown of...
The money that is considering to be spent in Ukraine, this isn't including what's already been spent.
And frankly, God only knows how much we've spent.
I mean, for like two years, every month there's been a new bill for tens of billions or hundreds of billions of dollars in the citizens of Ukraine.
If you go to the official numbers, they're like, America has sent $75 billion in aid to Ukraine.
It's like, well, that's weird because I remember them spending $100 billion on top of the $75 billion.
So hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent.
But let's leave that to the side and look just at the $60 billion that are being proposed.
That's, you know, we're being threatened with sending our sons and daughters to die overseas if we don't pass this bill.
$60 billion, just with very, very simple math.
For $60 billion, we could build around 1,400 state-of-the-art high schools.
Or we could prolong the hopeless war in Ukraine for a few more months.
28 new high schools per state?
Or death and destruction?
How would you spend the money? With a median high school cost of $45 million, which is actually high.
Maybe it's the median, but the range is like $20 million to $50 million on average for 2023.
And so this is a higher end.
This is a top-of-the-line, state-of-the-art high school.
28 of them per state.
Okay? Okay. That's the choice we're making.
And I had people comment underneath being like, but actually schools are bad.
It's like, you get what I'm saying?
You understand what I'm expressing here?
The massive benefit $60 billion could bring to the American people versus sending it to Ukraine for no reason like idiots.
Don't build schools, whatever.
Build stadiums, build roads, fix bridges, whatever.
It doesn't matter. If it's our money, it should serve us.
And when it's that amount of money, it's unbelievable what you can do with it.
It is astonishing what you can achieve with $60 billion if you benefit the people of the United States, not the people who run the United States.
We're going to take a little history lesson here.
We're going to take a little trip back in time.
But before we do that, well, this is a little trip back in time.
We're going to go to this video, clip number six.
This is a chart of foreign aid, where it's gone, from America, and we'll track it along.
Let's kick it off, clip number six.
Here we go. We got the UK, United Kingdom up far and ahead of everybody else.
Germany, France, Italy, Japan, Greece.
You see France is really making a move there.
The total is reaching $400 billion in just the first few years of this.
Now we're at 1956, 57, 80 billion to the UK, 70 billion to France, Italy making to come up, India, Really making moves.
Vietnam making big moves.
That's a warning sign, by the way, of what's to come.
South Korea now starting to edge out.
Italy, South Korea now in third place as 1964.
We're, of course, fighting communism.
Now Vietnam just...
Making a play for first place in the homestretch here.
Hundreds of billions of dollars into Vietnam.
That's courtesy of the Vietnam War.
Very similar to what's happening in Ukraine, of course.
We're in 1975. You can see it's not Europe so much that we're sending money to, but everywhere else.
Here comes Israel. Oh, Israel, the dark horse of the match.
Making a play for third.
Now they're in third place.
Now they're in second place.
Obviously, our best friends Israel relationship, which has been nothing but positive for us, right?
Now they're still in second place, but creeping up on Vietnam.
We stopped sending the money to Vietnam, and Israel's in first place.
Israel's in first place as of 1990 and continues to outstretch the competition, continuously moving on higher and higher in the hundreds of billions of dollars.
We're approaching $2 trillion in foreign aid now, and Israel continues to expand its first place position.
Again, we can get into why that is not even taking into account the money spent on war in Iraq.
Iraq is rapidly making its way up the field to the very top of the list.
Egypt now edges out Vietnam for second place.
Afghanistan, of course.
So we're in 2013 now.
We're 10 years into the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, bringing both of those nations up into the top six positions.
Israel still far out and ahead.
The number one recipient of our aid.
They have, by the way, free health care, free college, less debt than we do.
But we continue to send them just ungodly amounts of money.
So there are the top 20 destinations of USAID over the last several decades.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
And when you really think about it, when you really put it into perspective and think about the schools, the hospitals, and the roads and the bridges, and I get it.
We don't like the government. I understand.
Pay attention to what I'm saying here.
I'm saying the money is being spent...
On ridiculous crap.
It's spent on war. It's spent on the geopolitical machinations of people who aren't even American.
It's spent on Israel.
It's spent on Egypt.
What does this have to do with America?
What could we do with that money?
If it has to be spent, can we not spend it on ourselves?
If it doesn't have to be spent, can the people just keep it in their pockets?
Can they just... Keep their own money instead of being relentlessly robbed for the benefit of everybody who's not us.
Can we have some semblance of concern about the well-being and productivity and prosperity and safety of the American people over literally everybody else in the world?
Nationalism is the answer.
We have to have a club, folks.
We have to have a club that we're in and that other people aren't in.
If that doesn't exist, then the nation doesn't exist and America becomes less of a nation and more of an economic zone for which the people are secondary and exist to serve the economy rather than the economy serving the people.
We'll get into where this began.
The secret funds that probably outstrip the legitimate funds that you've seen there.
How this began in World War I and how it began with the sole intent and purpose of, get this, propping up the Soviet Union and spreading communism around the world.
Stay tuned. We're going to get into the history of foreign aid here in just a second.
Run down the exploitation that's taking place of the American people and where that money's gone here in just a second.
I do want to ask you to tune in tomorrow Last week, we filmed a new skit meeting.
It is pretty much complete.
It's the Climate Change Pitch Meeting.
So tune in tomorrow to see the world premiere of Climate Change Pitch Meeting.
And today, after the show, I'm going to go and finish editing it and also compile all of the stories that inform the jokes being made because you would not believe them if I didn't accompany them with the story.
I mean, when you hear... A joke about we're going to cut down trees and bury them in the ground.
As an environmentalist, you would think I'm making that up.
So I'm going to bring receipts and show how every single line in the skit is built on a real-life event that's happening.
So tune in for that.
Please do go to Infowars store to support us.
I'm saving some of these other stories, even though they sort of...
Blur the boundary between foreign aid and climate change.
In this case, Joe Biden's green energy plan is a gift to China, experts warn amid fears Biden could plunder more than $100 billion from U.S. taxpayer payers under scheme designed to boost American manufacturing.
So, you know, the irony of offshoring everything to China while supporting green energy programs that China doesn't even pay lip service to is all...
Absurd, but tune in tomorrow to see that in skit form.
But I want to read from this book called Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed.
We're going to go to page 357 here, where he talks about what happened during World War I and II and how a system was set up to rob Americans wholesale for the benefit of the Soviet Union.
In the First World War, American entry coincided with the revolution in Russia.
And Mr. House...
Was it once? And Mr.
House, you need to look into, but it doesn't matter.
At once instructed the president to proffer our financial, industrial, and moral support in every way possible to the new democracy.
Democracy. Communism.
In the Second War, Hitler's attack on the Moscovite accomplice followed quickly on...
On his Muscovite accomplice, followed quickly on Mr.
Roosevelt's second re-inauguration, but before Pearl Harbor, America was in the war as far as support of the new, quote, democracy was concerned, for financial, industrial, and moral support by way of land lease, which was being prepared for the revolutionary state in a measure never before imagined possible.
By June of 1942, President Roosevelt's intimate, a Mr.
Harry Hopkins, publicly told the communist state at a mass meeting in Madison Square Garden, Sharing with you all that we have and are.
These words reflect a presidential order issued earlier on March 7, 1942 to American war agencies and much later made public that preference in the supply of munition should be given to the Soviet Union over all other allies and even armed forces of the United States.
Now, they use the word appeasement as if they were appeasing the communist powers, but he says the word appeasement is incorrectly used, for the policy went far beyond simple appeasement and was obviously aimed at increasing the military and industrial strength of the revolutionary state after the war.
So, as the saying is that through Lend-Lease, the Soviet Union was actually given all of the supplies they needed to industrialize post-war and become a world power.
The support given was so prodigious that it enabled communism to extend over a vast area and to prepare for another war as well.
The prospect of this third war, arising immediately from the second one, In the zero-studded firmament...
The amount Lynn leased to the revolutionary state by President Roosevelt might seem insignificant.
$9.5 billion.
In fact, arms and goods to that value were shipped, in theory, on a sale or return basis.
It was a new, vast transfer of treasure, and a few decades earlier would have enabled several new states to set up housekeeping without fear of the future.
The stream of wealth was directed by one man, described by his official biographer...
As the second most important person in the United States, Mr.
Harry Hopkins thus played the potentate's part in the distribution of war material first filled by Mr.
Bernard Baruch in 1917.
The original idea was Mr.
Baruch's, who in 1916 insistently demanded that one man be appointed as the administrator of the all-powerful War Industries Board, which, when America entered that war, grew out of an earlier advisory commission attached to the President's Cabinet's Defense Council.
So again, to run you through this, in World War I, the Advisory Commission of the Defense Council was transformed into the War Industries Board, which was designed and organized to be a one-man operation controlled entirely by one person who would be in charge of distributing goods from America to our allies,
and they were told, the America was told by the person running this that the Soviets were to be preferred before anybody else.
They were the first to receive and received the most help from the United States.
At a Congressional Investigating Committee of 1919, Headed by Mr.
William J. Graham, the advisory commission, which produced the 1918 War Industries Board, quote, served as the secret government of the United States.
A commission of seven men chosen by the president seems to have devised the entire system of purchasing war supplies, planned a press censorship, designed a system of food control, and in a word, designed practically every war measure that the Congress subsequently enacted and did this all behind closed doors weeks and even months before the designed practically every war measure that the Congress subsequently enacted and did this all behind closed doors weeks and
Okay, so you had these pre-established committees that were then put in operation before war was even declared in order to distribute funds to allies.
primarily the Soviet Union.
Again, explains this with the Defense Council, the Advisory Commission, that was enlarged into the War Production Board, the counterpart of the 1918 War Industries Board.
Again, Propagated and started by Bernard Baruch.
Even the War Production Board became of secondary importance when the Lend-Lease administration was set up and Mr.
Harry Hopkins was appointed administrator and also chairman of President Roosevelt's Soviet Protocol Committee with power to determine supply quotas to be dispatched to Russia.
Mr. Hopkins could only have occupied so elevated a place in the 20th century.
Public opinion, if informed by a free and impartial press, would hardly have suffered him, for he had no qualifications to handle great affairs, least of all foreign ones.
And basically his biographer was like, this dude had no right and no ability to be in charge of all the funds he was in charge of.
And he lists out the billions of dollars sent in Lend-Lease, saying this was only a small part of the total transfer of wealth in many forms.
The American government has never published the details of its deliveries, but the fact...
That these are known and that a greater part of them seem to consist of supplies obviously designed to strengthen the industrial and war-making capacity of a revolutionary state after the war's end due to one of the accidents which assists historians.
So basically this guy, Captain George Racy Jordan, was put in charge of overseeing the transfer of wealth.
And he happened to take notes and keep orders of everything that was going on.
One interesting thing is that Captain Jordan was instructed to report to the United Nations Depot No.
8. He found it at New York Airport to be described on his orders.
Now the body known as United Nations wasn't set up for three more years.
So they already had United Nations depots and were using the term United Nations despite the fact that the United Nations didn't actually exist yet, showing a...
pre-planning aspect of this.
At the time, Captain Georgian began to realize that the mass of materials that was going to the communist state was not the least covered by the terms of the master Lend-Lease Agreement, but included many things that had nothing to do with defense and everything to do with post-war strengthening of the Soviet.
He noted, for instance, the supply of tractors and farm machinery, aluminum manufacturing plant, railway, car shops, steel mill equipment, and the like, more than the Lend-Lease Program.
He also noticed black suitcases that were filled with secret documents from the State Department, all with the signature of Albert Hiss and Sire.
Major Jordan had never heard of either name, but they were the names of the chief State Department official later convicted, Alger Hiss, and another State Department official involved in the same affair.
And this... Officer Jordan just kept a record of what was going on, and I don't even have time to read all of these, but pages are filled with the number of things being sent.
33,000 pounds of cobalt ore and concentrate, cobalt metal and bearings, 800,000 pounds of those, uranium metal, 2 pounds, aluminum tubes, 13...
Million pounds of those.
Graphite, 8 million pounds.
Thorium, uranium nitrate, oxide, and urano-uranic oxide, aluminum and alloys.
366 million pounds of that.
Aluminum rods, 13 million pounds of that.
And it just goes on and on and on.
We sent the Soviet Union billions and probably hundreds of billions of dollars of raw material and Necessary components to build their industrial capacity to create the enemy that we would then spend in the next several decades waging a Cold War against.
This has happened for the last hundred years.
It is in an organized fashion, and our tax dollars are being sent by the billions for people that will eventually fight.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Infowars.com forward slash show.
Hello, Americans. I want to share with you a story.
A story about inflammation, the silent menace that lurks within our bodies, affecting our health and well-being.
Inflammation, the root cause of countless ailments, quietly wreaking havoc over time.
Long-term exposure to inflammation has been linked to a myriad of health issues, from heart disease to arthritis, even cognitive decline.
But fear not, for there's a beacon of hope found in the wisdom of nature, a remedy that has stood the test of time, turmeric.
And now I present to you Baudis from InfoWarsStore.com, a powerful blend crafted with precision boasting 95% curcuminoids extracted from turmeric.
alex jones
It's good for your heart, your brain, everything.
It is 40% off, back in stock, Baudis Ultimate Turmeric Formula.
Export Selection