Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| It appears as if German lawyer Reiner Fulmich, who recognized the COVID crimes against humanity as early as 2020, has been set up. | ||
| Fulmich was spearheading a project known as the Second Nuremberg and co-founded the Corona Investigative Committee. | ||
| This committee consulted about 150 scientists and experts from around the world, as well as former employees of the World Health Organization, and their findings showed them that the COVID measures were the first steps in a plan to destroy regional economies in order to make populations dependent upon global supply chains, and were intended to reduce the population and install a world government under the United Nations. | ||
| The Corona Committee received a lot of donations, which they believed were not safe due to the recent history of bank accounts being seized by complicit governments. | ||
| One million euros in gold was purchased and put in holding. | ||
| To fund operations, both Reiner Fulmich and Vivian Fisher took out secured loans. | ||
|
unidentified
|
At a time of grave risk, For the money in our bank account, we decided to act immediately and we took money out of that account, both she and I did, in order to save it and keep it from such an attachment so that we would be able to continue with our work. | |
| We wouldn't have been able to pay for the translators, for the IT, for the management, etc., etc. | ||
| Reiner's loan was for 700,000 euros and was to be repaid with the proceeds from selling his home, all documented and agreed upon by the committee. | ||
| Members of the Corona Committee met with a law firm in August of 2022 and filed criminal charges against Fulmuk. | ||
| Committee members Justice Hoffman, Marcel Templin, and Antonia Fisher claimed that Fulmuk embezzled 700,000 euros, the loan that he officially took out. | ||
| They claimed he was a violent anti-Semite and that if he were given the opportunity to comment before criminal proceedings began, they would not file the complaint. | ||
| Two warrants were issued for his arrest, from Germany and from the EU, without Reiner's knowledge. | ||
| Without an international arrest warrant, German and Mexican authorities illegally abducted Fulmuk at the German embassy in Mexico. | ||
| He was then flown to the Frankfurt airport, where he was arrested and put in jail. | ||
| International law experts are calling his arrest an illegal kidnapping. | ||
| According to documented company plans, Fulmic's loan was to be repaid after the sale of his property. | ||
| But the very same people that filed the complaint against Fulmic sabotaged this agreement. | ||
| The contracts stated that the profits of the Fulmic property was to be transferred to a Fulmic account so that he could repay the loan. | ||
| But the notary, who was sworn to be neutral and independent, instructed the buyers to transfer the 1.158 million euros into Marcel Templin's account. | ||
| Which made it impossible for Reiner to repay the loan. | ||
| The loans were transparently agreed upon in written contracts. | ||
| There was no secrecy, and the company was aware of the loans at all times. | ||
| The evidence that proves this has been officially submitted to the court, who has chosen to ignore it and has muzzled the defense and ordered they not be allowed to mention it. | ||
| The evidence shows that Hoffman, Templin, and the notary illegally obtained access to the profits of Fulmic's property. | ||
| And not only is the court ignoring this evidence, they have summoned these same people as witnesses against Fulmic. | ||
| The complaint states, Fulmic has also made himself liable to prosecution for embezzlement by purchasing the gold bars without the consent of the shareholders, obscuring their existence and possessing them for himself. | ||
| But the purchase of the gold bars is also documented. | ||
| They are in holding and can only be accessed with the signatures of both Reiner Fulmick and Vivian Fisher. | ||
| This is shown in company documents, which were never given to the public prosecutor, but they have been submitted by the defense and are being ignored by the court. | ||
| Furthermore, while the court froze Fulmick's accounts, they failed to freeze the 1.158 million euros in Marcel Templin's account, which is presumably still there and appears to be the payoff for this internal coup. | ||
| The trial is happening now in Germany and the plaintiff's sloppy accusations are beginning to fall apart. | ||
| One reporter at the trial said, the case was totally destroyed and one could only sit there in amazement. | ||
| A journalist from Biddle TV said that Reiner will not only be released but also compensated. | ||
| The people who did this to him, in my opinion, will be charged themselves. | ||
| It is beginning to appear as if justice may finally be served. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Thursday, February 15th in the year of 2024. | |
| It's Thursday, February 15th in the year of 2024. | ||
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back to The American Journal, folks. | ||
| I am Chase Geyser. | ||
| The host this morning. Alex is out this week until either Sunday or Monday. | ||
| I'm not sure if he's coming back on Sunday. | ||
| I bet he will. Getting his larynx a little bit of a rest. | ||
| He mentioned it on air, I believe on Monday or Tuesday, that his voice was just shot this week. | ||
| And so he's going to give it a little bit of a much-needed and much-deserved break. | ||
| But he'll be right back at it. | ||
| So today on The Alex Jones Show, it will be hosted by Owen Schroer. | ||
| And your favorite host, Harrison Smith, will be hosting The War Room this afternoon. | ||
| And the same schedule will be applied to tomorrow. | ||
| As always, where do we begin with the news? | ||
| Yesterday something very interesting happened, which I want to spend some substantial time on. | ||
| And one of the reasons I want to spend time on it is not only because I think it's so fascinating and disturbing and alarming, but I pay attention to how different posts perform that I post on X and different topics are trending just to get some insight with what's resonating with the audience. | ||
| Many of those who follow me on social media are also Infowars listeners. | ||
| My following has grown since I... Got involved here at Infowars. | ||
| And yesterday I posted a sort of like, I guess a short article about the accusations against Russia, the allegations against Russia that they either have or are planning to have nukes in space, space nukes, nuclear weapons in orbit. | ||
| Now, I don't understand all the details or intricacies around sort of the strategic reasoning for wanting to put nukes in space. | ||
| Obviously, it would be expensive to do that. | ||
| A lot of research and development necessary. | ||
| I imagine it's because if you have nukes in space, they can sort of orbit the planet and attack targets. | ||
| In a much more rapid, accurate way with much more difficulty in terms of defending against those nukes. | ||
| That's what I imagine. But I did a little bit of research looking into this and apparently there was a treaty in 1967 called the Outer Space Treaty. | ||
| And it was between a number of superpowers, large nations, first world countries, NATO nations, and the USSR at the time. | ||
| Where everyone basically got together during this sort of push for nuclear non-proliferation and agreed that although these nations would continue to develop their defenses, would continue to develop their nuclear arsenal, would continue to test nuclear weapons, they agreed that they would put no nukes in space in 1967. | ||
| And I find it incredibly interesting how some of the pieces are coming together around this Russia, Ukraine, NATO, United States conflict. | ||
| So, we have Putin last week speaking with Tucker. | ||
| Obviously, Putin is not somebody who frequently interacts with American journalists, other than perhaps Edward Snowden, who's an asylum in Moscow, and Tucker Carlson. | ||
| And when you look at somebody like Putin, regardless of whether you like Putin or whether you despise Putin, regardless of whether you think he's a good man or an evil despot, You cannot underestimate how sophisticated and how intelligent this man is. | ||
| People say former KGB, former KGB. I don't think he's just any KGB guy. | ||
| Imagine being in sort of a prominent intelligence position during the Soviet Union. | ||
| Then when that Soviet Union collapses, you have utter chaos in the USSR. You have generals that are selling off weapons. | ||
| You have a lot of under-the-table deals going on. | ||
| Your entire economic structure is basically resetting right beneath you. | ||
| And somehow, as a former intelligence officer of the USSR, you manage to get in the leadership of this new Russia. | ||
| And not only do you stay in leadership in this new Russia, but you actually move up and successfully establish yourself as the president of this country. | ||
| And you're not killed or assassinated or cooed out for decades. | ||
| So regardless of whether you think Putin is an evil man or a good man, I happen to think that he's guilty of many of the things that his critics say he's guilty of. | ||
| You cannot underestimate how strategically brilliant this man is. | ||
| And it's interesting to me that they had this Tucker interview come out and they decided to do a press briefing with the President of the United States basically at the same time. | ||
| So everybody had a very clear A-B comparison of Vladimir Putin versus Joe Biden. | ||
| And the disparity between the two, in my opinion, was absolutely astounding. | ||
| I mean, it's one thing to watch clip after clip of Joe Biden collapsing or to watch clip after clip of Joe Biden failing to complete sentences, forgetting when his son died. | ||
| Just sort of asinine astronomical flaws. | ||
| But it's another thing to see that juxtaposed To someone like Putin responding in a very thoughtful, strategic, and tactful way to difficult questions about perhaps the most controversial issue of our time this year, which is this conflict in Ukraine. | ||
| And I'm not saying that he was telling the truth or that he was right or that we should rally behind Russia or support Putin. | ||
| I'm not an apologist for Putin. | ||
| But it is obvious that he... | ||
| Handled that interview with Tucker masterfully. | ||
| And when we analyze how smart this guy is, he speaks German fluently, he speaks English as well. | ||
| Fluently. He's been known to correct his translators when they mistranslate English being translated to him. | ||
| And this guy knows. He just prefers to speak in Russian because I believe it's sort of the most sophisticated language that he can speak in. | ||
| He's most masterful of Russian, right? | ||
| So when he wants to convey important ideas or be absolutely sure that he's getting a message across, he uses Russian and then relies on translators. | ||
| But he understands these... | ||
| He knows what's going on. | ||
| He's tactfully, strategically brilliant. | ||
| And when we analyze what he's doing, we shouldn't just analyze what he says, but we should ask the question, why? | ||
| Why did he decide at this particular time to have a conversation with Tucker Carlson? | ||
| Well, the first thing is Tucker Carlson no longer... | ||
| Works for Fox News. | ||
| So he knows that he's speaking to a journalist that isn't beholden to an editor or a producer or any sort of top-down management of whether or not this interview is going to be cut, edited, or just closeted altogether. | ||
| That's the first thing. | ||
| But the second thing is, it's so fascinating to me that this happens, this interview happens inside of a week of these accusations against Russia regarding these space nukes. | ||
| Not to mention the fact of how funny it is that now they're criticizing Russia of space nukes after years of making fun of Donald Trump for establishing the Space Force. | ||
| In the event that these space nukes are a reality, it seems to me that maybe the Space Force was actually a prudent presidential decision. | ||
| Why is nobody talking about that? | ||
| And so I'm looking at this, alright, they told us not to listen to the Putin interview. | ||
| Everybody said the Putin interview was going to be Putin propaganda. | ||
| Before the interview even came out, the antagonism for it, regardless of what the substance of it was, was overwhelming. | ||
| Which I find just inherently problematic because if we're going to criticize an interview, we should probably at least listen to it first. | ||
| It's like writing a review of a movie before the movie comes out, just sort of based on the trailer. | ||
| That's basically what the entire leftist establishment did, whether it was on acts from independent podcasters and journalists all the way sort of up the ladder to the New York Times and the intelligence community itself coming out and saying, don't believe a word that Putin says. | ||
| So they're telling us that Putin is a liar about everything. | ||
| And then within a week, they are making these accusations of space news. | ||
| And a couple of things on the space news. | ||
| First thing that comes to mind is, I find it very hard to believe that Russia, China, and the United States haven't had nuclear weapons in space for years, despite the fact that they signed the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, prohibiting the placement of nukes in space. | ||
| That's the first thing. So when I hear that Russia's got nukes in space, I, as a listener, or just as a regular citizen, I'm not any more alarmed or concerned for my safety than I was before. | ||
| I mean, if... If Russia has enough nukes to destroy the planet 10 times over, 100 times over already, and we know that we don't have enough defenses to stop all their nukes if they were launched at once, as was the sort of dilemma of the Cold War... | ||
| Then why would I be any more fearful of Russia having nukes in space? | ||
| It just... It doesn't make sense to be scared or to take this as a serious threat. | ||
| Even if it's true, it's like, okay, well, they could... | ||
| So you're telling me that not only can they kill us A, B, and C ways, but they could kill us D ways too? | ||
| Like, come on. But what's alarming to me is when you connect all of the dots... | ||
| So take a look at what, was it the defense minister of Sweden or Switzerland? | ||
| I always mix them up, the ESWs, said regarding getting into NATO in July, regarding A likelihood of war with Russia this summer. | ||
| I mean, nations that have traditionally remained neutral for years are now preparing for war with Russia. | ||
| That's bizarre. Why is the entire international community preparing for a war with Russia? | ||
| Then you have this interview come out sort of out of nowhere between Putin and Tucker. | ||
| We saw the backlash to it even before it came out. | ||
| Then once it comes out, it's sort of eye-opening. | ||
| A lot of the things that were said were reasonable points. | ||
| And then now we have this accusation against Russia of these space nukes. | ||
| Now, we've seen cheap shots for years. | ||
| From the left and the right, frankly, on the so-called enemies of America on political opponents. | ||
| We know that there's this game that's played on the media landscape, on the media stage, where there's jabs and there's just sort of maneuvering. | ||
| But there's a difference between moving a few pawns around and going in for a major conflict over the center of the board. | ||
| In chess, The game actually revolves around control of the center of the board. | ||
| The four squares right in the middle. | ||
| And he who controls the four squares typically winds up with the checkmate. | ||
| And so there's tertiary things that happen or tangent things that happen sort of on the outside of the center conflict in chess and in this sort of media political landscape. | ||
| And then there's the major conflict, the denouement that happens like in the middle of the board. | ||
| And I actually think that what we saw yesterday... | ||
| Is an example of a major development. | ||
| As subtle as it was. | ||
| As whatever as it was. | ||
| As sort of psyop-y as it was. | ||
| And I shared my thoughts on X about this. | ||
| It's reached I think over a million people now. | ||
| It really popped off. | ||
| And I wanted it to. Because it was important to me to see this. | ||
| Or to show this to people. | ||
| For people to see this. If... | ||
| Russia is formally and publicly accused of violating the Outer Space Treaty of 1967. | ||
| And I know that it's Russia, not the USSR. But Russia did inherit the treaty obligations of the USSR as part of the collapse of the Soviet Union. | ||
| If Russia is being publicly accused of this, then Russia That means that this could be used as a legal justification for the United States and NATO to get involved in a war directly with Russia, explicitly with Russia, our soldiers on the ground, NATO soldiers on the ground, basically before Ukraine completely loses. | ||
| So we accuse Russia of violating the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, and then that is how NATO is justified to go in and... | ||
| Wage war against Russia. | ||
| And if we look at the details of what happened yesterday, and I'm going to show you the clip of Jake Sullivan talking about this, it's very interesting to me that there was this so-called major national security vulnerability or threat. | ||
| The public was immediately notified about it existing and Whatever this threat may be, despite the fact that it was classified, A, so they want the public to know. | ||
| B, basically instantly the details of the threat were leaked to the public. | ||
| So either the intelligence community is completely incompetent regarding keeping the secret or they leaked it intentionally because they want people to know about it. | ||
| And the reason they would want people to know about the details of this classified threat is because it has to be public knowledge in order for NATO to wield it or leverage it or use it as an excuse to engage in an explicit military conflict with Russia on behalf of Ukraine. | ||
| I want to go ahead and run to this clip of Jake Sullivan discussing the national security threat yesterday in a briefing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
House Intelligence Chair speaking out about a imminent, or he doesn't say imminent, serious national security threat. | |
| The lack of your ability to say anything has the potential to raise distress for some Americans. | ||
| In the simplest of terms, can you tell Americans that there's nothing they have to worry about right now in terms of what he describes as a national security threat? | ||
| Look, I think in a way that question is impossible to answer with a straight yes, right? | ||
| Because Americans understand that there are a range of threats and challenges in the world that we're dealing with every single day. | ||
| And those threats and challenges range from terrorism to state actors. | ||
| And we have to contend with them, and we have to contend with them in a way where we ensure the ultimate security of the American people. | ||
| I am confident that President Biden, in the decisions that he is taking, is going to ensure the security of the American people going forward. | ||
| And I will stand here at this podium and assert that look you in the eye with confidence that we believe that we can and will and are protecting the national security of the United States and the American people. | ||
| So not only is Jake Sullivan coming out and talking about this national security threat, saying, hey, it exists, but I can't tell you about it. | ||
| Trust me, why? | ||
| I can't tell you. | ||
| We always hear from these people. | ||
| But then we have House Intel Chair issuing a cryptic warning of serious national security threats sort of right after this, urging Biden to declassify the details. | ||
| Why would they need to declassify the details? | ||
| So if they are the ones responsible for national security, if they are the ones who can actually respond to this threat, if they are the ones... | ||
| Who understand all the details. | ||
| Why is it that they want to declassify it so the public can know? | ||
| The only reason that they want to declassify information is because they want public support. | ||
| In order to get the political power needed to expand beyond their current capabilities. | ||
| So if we imagine all of the things that our government can legally do now without any sort of support or approval from the people, it's astronomical power that they have. | ||
| I mean, we hire mercenaries, we can send... | ||
| Troops around. We can train anyone. | ||
| We can sort of indiscriminately bomb different proxies of Iran without congressional approval. | ||
| I mean, the United States has substantial military power, regardless of whether the people support it, regardless of whether Congress supports any sort of military action. | ||
| And so the fact that they're calling for this to be declassified means that they need political support for even more power than they already have. | ||
| And what could they possibly need more power for other than a serious explicit escalation of this conflict basically between Russia and the rest of the world, the globalist community? | ||
| House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, Republican from Ohio, on Wednesday issued a cryptic warning of a serious national security threat against the United States. | ||
| I'm going to read this statement to you directly from the chairman. | ||
| Today, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has made available to all members of Congress information concerning a serious national security threat. | ||
| Obviously, if you make information available to all members of Congress, you basically guarantee that it's going to be leaked to the public. | ||
| So he's saying here that they decided they wanted the public to know. | ||
| I am requesting that President Biden declassify all information relating to this threat so that Congress, the administration, and our allies can openly discuss the actions necessary to respond to this threat. | ||
| Congress, the administration, and our allies. | ||
| So he's saying so that NATO can respond to the threat. | ||
| So we have to declassify the threat in order for NATO to be able to use it as political leverage or political justification to wage war more explicitly on Russia. | ||
| And I don't know if this threat is real or fake or the details, but it doesn't really matter whether or not it's real or fake. | ||
| What matters is how it's being used. | ||
| It doesn't really matter whether or not 9-11 was an inside job or not. | ||
| It was still going to be used opportunistically by the deep state to expand its own power, as we saw with the Patriot Act. | ||
| And so we see our... | ||
| Members of Congress, we see our leaders, Republicans and Democrats alike, basically in this uniparty, wanting this information declassified so it can be used to leverage the international community into an explicit conflict. | ||
| I mean, I honestly think that they're trying to start World War III right now. | ||
| And the only reason I can think of that makes sense is that Ukraine is on the brink of total, undeniable defeat. | ||
| I mean, it basically is on the brink of not existing anymore. | ||
| The capital in Ukraine is being bombed constantly. | ||
| Moscow I don't think has been bombed once. | ||
| So it's very obvious who's winning and who's losing this conflict. | ||
| We've sent billions upon billions of dollars. | ||
| And frankly speaking, no matter how many weapons we send to Ukraine, no matter how much we provide in terms of services, training, and supplies to Ukraine, if they don't have men to fight a war over there, then there's nothing we can't buy a victory. | ||
| There's nothing we can do. You just simply can't win when there's not people to win, when there's not an opponent left. | ||
| And so, knowing that Ukraine is on the brink, basically, of total defeat, it seems to me that NATO and our leaders and our intelligence community have made the decision behind the scenes to get involved in this war on behalf of Ukraine. | ||
| And that this is simply the pretext to justify that action. | ||
| So they're going to come out and say, how can we get involved legally in a war with Russia? | ||
| Well, let's look at all the treaties we signed with Russia. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They go back and say, oh, this one. | |
| Outer Space Treaty 1967. | ||
| If we can say or prove or fake, or if they did, just as we probably have, we can say that Russia violated this agreement. | ||
| And we can use that as a justification to activate actions, which were the very purpose for the establishment of NATO to begin with. | ||
| I mean, NATO was made to sort of mitigate the USSR Cold War threat. | ||
| It was supposed to contain and control this nuclear threat during the Cold War. | ||
| And when the Cold War was over, somehow NATO didn't vanish like it should have. | ||
| And so now it's going back to Cold War erratreaties and negotiations and agreements to try to find any example of where Russia may have slipped up or where they can simply claim that Russia slipped up so that they can activate the power that they were granted during the Cold War. | ||
| which is explicit military conflict with Russia. | ||
| I mean, I think as of yesterday, before, you know, we would talk about being on the brink of nuclear war and I'd be like, yeah, they say that all the time. | ||
| Yesterday was the first time in my life where I really thought, okay, this could happen. | ||
| I'm not talking about tomorrow, but Russia is not going to allow itself to lose any war. | ||
| And if it gets to the point where Russia is about to explicitly lose in Ukraine, or when the whole world is at war with them, it's going to be given no choice but to use its nuclear weapons. | ||
| So why are we putting them in a position that We'll be talking more about the products throughout the show as well. | ||
| Stick with us, folks, for more on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're watching The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back to The American Journal, folks. | ||
| I'm your host today, Chase Geiser. | ||
| I'll be filling in for Harrison for today and tomorrow. | ||
| And Harrison will be hosting The War Room this afternoon at 3 p.m. | ||
| Central Time while Owen Schroer covers for The Great Alex Jones at 11 a.m. | ||
| Central. So we spent the last 20 minutes or so talking about these new sort of allegations against Russia regarding the violation of the Outer Space Treaty of 1967. | ||
| And there's a couple other sort of variables that I see on the desk today that are just fascinating to me. | ||
| me. | ||
| So the first thing I want to talk about is Putin says that he prefers Biden over Trump. | ||
| So headed into the election season, it is perhaps only natural and entirely to be expected that the mainstream media will hyperventilate over every side remark that Vladimir Putin makes on what's shaping up to be a Trump versus Biden match in November. | ||
| Russian interference is no doubt always looming darkly on the horizon, we are told. | ||
| So apparently Vladimir Putin came out and He said that he prefers Biden over Trump. | ||
| And let's just unpack this a little bit. | ||
| So the first thing that occurred to me when I heard of this yesterday is, okay, so the left is going to spin this. | ||
| And I bet you, Corrine, if she hasn't already done a press conference, she's probably going to do one today. | ||
| I bet you Corrine is going to say that Putin is pretending to prefer Biden over Trump in order to support Trump. | ||
| Putin knows that if he comes out and says that he supports Biden, since so many people hate Putin, that it can only help Trump. | ||
| That's the angle that I think they're going to take this. | ||
| We saw the Krasensteins do a little bit of this on X yesterday as well. | ||
| And I replied with a quote post to my tweet, basically saying that this was going to be what the left was going to do. | ||
| This is the narrative. And the other thing is, it's actually possible that it's true because Putin may want a weak president instead of a strong president if Putin seeks to accomplish his sort of international goals for Russia, namely the maintenance and security of its own sovereignty. | ||
| And it just calls to mind, do you remember the interview between Tucker and Russia last week where Tucker explicitly asked Vladimir Putin when the last time was that Putin spoke with President Biden. | ||
| Putin responded, I don't remember. | ||
| Now, it's possible that he was lying and he remembers, but he's trying to sort of downplay the significance or the importance of President Biden or even his own leadership. | ||
| It's possible that he's basically trying to undermine The appearance of President Biden in the eyes of all the Americans who were watching the interview. | ||
| It's also possible that their last interaction was so inconsequential that Putin legitimately doesn't remember. | ||
| I know that as I'm getting older, I'm having memories from high school or college, and I'm thinking to myself, wow, I can't remember that person's name. | ||
| I know exactly who it was. | ||
| I can tell you all about them. I just don't remember their name. | ||
| I don't remember the last time I saw him. | ||
| I don't remember the last time I interacted with him. | ||
| So it's possible he was just telling the truth. | ||
| But one thing is for sure. | ||
| He said that he hasn't spoken to President Biden since this war broke out in Ukraine. | ||
| Which I find incredibly bizarre and alarming given the fact that the United States is basically the number one supporter and funder of Russia. | ||
| I mean, you'd think that if negotiations were called for that That would be the first conversation. | ||
| And so what occurs to me as a result of this new knowledge that we've been given, and I don't even believe that the Biden administration has denied the veracity of Putin's claim that he hasn't spoken to Biden since before this conflict broke out. | ||
| But what occurs to me is President Biden is so inconsequential a president of the United States. | ||
| He's so out of control, sort of handled and managed. | ||
| That there's no reason whatsoever for Vladimir Putin to have a conversation with him. | ||
| I mean, you want to talk to a decision maker. | ||
| I was in sales for years. I owned a small business. | ||
| I have cold called thousands of people. | ||
| I've read sales pitches and sales scripts to so many people. | ||
| I can still utter the script to you right now. | ||
| Even when I was in eighth grade, the summer after eighth grade, I worked for a call center to save money because I wanted to buy some Recording equipment so I could make music. | ||
| I was interested in music then when I was 15. | ||
| I remember. Hi, this is Chase Geiser with TLMA Consulting. | ||
| I'm sorry for calling out of the blue, but the reason we're calling is because we have several well-financed buyers in your area looking for businesses just like yours. | ||
| Have you given any thought to selling your company in the next 12 months or so? | ||
| I said that to thousands of people. | ||
| And one of the first things that they taught me as a 15-year-old kid with braces, a bowl cut, and a tie-dye shirt, and a can of Mountain Dew, was you have to get past the gatekeeper. | ||
| Get to the decision maker. | ||
| It doesn't matter who you convince how great the idea is. | ||
| If they're not the decision maker, then you're not going to close any deals. | ||
| So the first thing was you always want to get past the gatekeeper. | ||
| You always want to get past whoever answers the phone and you want to talk to the small business owner right away because they're the only person that you can have a meaningful relationship with in order to manifest your goals, right? | ||
| The same thing is true for international politics. | ||
| Why would Putin waste his time speaking to Joe Biden on the phone when he knows, when Biden knows, when everybody knows, regardless of whether they're willing to admit it or not? | ||
| I mean, denial isn't just a river in Egypt. | ||
| Why would he waste his time having a conversation with someone who isn't responsible for making any of the actual meaningful decisions? | ||
| So that's like the number one... | ||
| Sort of proof to me. | ||
| I obviously knew this. | ||
| There's so much overwhelming evidence, but this is like the nail in the coffin. | ||
| President Biden is not running the United States of America. | ||
| We can argue all day about whether it's Barack Obama from his basement in sweatpants, whether it's Michelle Obama, whoever. | ||
| I happen to think it's just sort of the intelligence community as a whole. | ||
| I think it's run by committee, basically. | ||
| But you can't deny that it's not Joe calling the shots. | ||
| And that's why Vladimir Putin finds that it's more meaningful for him to have a conversation with Tucker Carlson than with the President of the United States. | ||
| We have an example of the leader of Russia in a major global conflict Deciding to spend two hours in conversation with Tucker Carlson instead of deciding to spend two minutes on a phone call with the President of the United States because the two hours with Tucker is more consequential and meaningful and valuable than two minutes with Joe Biden. | ||
| Tucker Carlson is literally more powerful than the President of the United States. | ||
| At least in Putin's eyes. | ||
| I mean, what other reason would there be? | ||
| And, frankly, we remember the Cold War between Russia and the United States. | ||
| They had, what was it called, guys? | ||
| Do you guys remember the name of that phone? | ||
| That they had where either the leader of Russia or the leader of the United States at any time could pick up the phone and immediately be on the red phone. | ||
| Yeah, immediately be on the phone with the other. | ||
| So they decided, hey, since we're in this really hot cold war, since we're in this really tense cold war and we understand the consequences of a nuclear exchange breaking out, maybe it would be a good idea for us to have the easiest way possible to communicate with each other at any time. | ||
| So that there's no mistakes made, there's no misunderstanding that could cause basically the destruction of humanity on accident. | ||
| I mean, when you're in a hyper conflict with somebody, the importance of communication is just astronomical. | ||
| It's more important than ever to be able to communicate. | ||
| In a conflict like that, whether it's business, whether it's personal, whether it's international, you have to be able to communicate. | ||
| And the fact that we go from this sort of red telephone dynamic of the Cold War to having heard from the guy in three years is like, oh my God, unprecedented. | ||
| So, you know, we have people in our administration who are speaking with people in their administration. | ||
| He's basically admitting that this country, and his to some extent, is run by the staff. | ||
| It's this bureaucratic system where the leaders are just sort of puppets or talking heads, and the real decisions are being made behind the scenes by appointed bureaucrats not accountable to the constituents of their nations. | ||
| More on the other side. American Journal folks, I am Chase Geyser, your host this morning. | ||
| Reporting from the command center here in Austin, Texas. | ||
| I spent some time talking about the fact that Putin hasn't spoken to Biden since before this war broke out. | ||
| Now we're on the cusp of World War III and they're not even talking to each other. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| And this short clip from yesterday that really popped off on X could be an example of the reason why. | ||
| I mean, just look at how vacant and distant and just overwhelmingly alarmingly dementia-ridden this man is. | ||
| Oblivious. Let's go ahead and run it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
President Biden, do you have any comment on Russia deploying nuclear weapons into space? | |
| President Biden, is that the classified information Russia considers... | ||
| Are you concerned about Russia sending nukes to their face? | ||
| Jill's wearing orange because secretly she supports Trump. | ||
| Another interesting aspect of this is how... | ||
| Pay attention to how we're going to see those who have traditionally supported Ukraine... | ||
| Kind of respond over the course of the coming days to all this. | ||
| I find it very interesting. I see this article on the desk here from Infowars.com. | ||
| Lindsey Graham's about face on Ukraine shows GOP patients with Kiev regime has run out. | ||
| So I'm not sure that this headline is an accurate characterization. | ||
| I don't know that it isn't. | ||
| But it seems to me that there's a lot of pressure. | ||
| from Republican voters being applied to Republican leaders about the Ukraine funding. | ||
| Everybody's frustrated about it. | ||
| Everybody's frankly pissed off that we've given billions upon billions of dollars for the protection of the border of Ukraine and totally neglected the protection of our very own border. | ||
| There is a there is rising animosity for any political figure who supports Ukraine in this country. | ||
| Basically, every every time something painful happens to an American or something painful happens in America, the bitterness meter goes up for any support for Ukraine. | ||
| And the right feels this. | ||
| And so what they started doing was the leadership on the right started by pretending to play hardball against Ukraine and really sort of in name only doing that. | ||
| Behind the scenes they're passing this stuff, this new stuff that's passing is just asinine with $95 billion allegedly going to our so-called allies. | ||
| And Let's just imagine for a moment, Lindsey Graham is famously sort of a war hawk. | ||
| We just need to put boots on the ground. | ||
| We just need to get boots on the ground over there. | ||
| Just our boys and boots. | ||
| Famously a war hawk. | ||
| Famously just part of the military industrial complex machine. | ||
| And he knows that there's pressure to not support Ukraine. | ||
| And so it's interesting that this sort of about-face is happening right as this space nuke allegation is coming out because now he can come out and say, hey, I wanted to pull support from Ukraine, but now NATO's going to war with Ukraine. | ||
| So we have to, as allies of NATO, as part of NATO, we have to support them. | ||
| So he's trying to backpedal from his support for Ukraine over the course of the last several years. | ||
| Because now it's sort of inevitable that this is going to play out and he's going to get what he wants. | ||
| He's going to get his World War III and he's going to try to feign that he didn't want it. | ||
| I mean, Graham considered to be among the most hawkish lawmakers in Washington, maybe counting on collapse in Ukraine to sink U.S. President Joe Biden's re-election chances. | ||
| Lindsey Graham Republican from South Carolina. | ||
| Long considered one of the U.S. Senate's foremost advocates of a muscular U.S. foreign policy. | ||
| Raised eyebrows this week when he repeatedly voted against lethal aid for Ukraine and Israel. | ||
| Yeah, well, why would you need to vote for aid against aid for Ukraine and Israel if NATO's about ready to take care of it for you? | ||
| We'll just give all the money to NATO, and then by proxy we'll be supporting Ukraine. | ||
| And so, between this World War III sort of conflict that's about ready to break out, between these sort of bizarre mass shootings that we're seeing, and then they get hush-hushed, between this totally open border and the obvious juxtaposition of Biden and Putin showing just how far gone Joe Biden really is. | ||
| I mean, he was never a particularly bright guy, but now he's just not even functional. | ||
| It's becoming more and more likely that Joe Biden isn't actually going to be the candidate. | ||
| Kamala Harris has made remarks that she's ready to step up whenever necessary. | ||
| Everybody's sort of spontaneously coming out and talking about how sharp Biden is behind the scenes, but it's almost just like a pat on the back before the get the hell out of here that seems to be coming. | ||
| And I was interested to hear Vivek's take on this. | ||
| I'm going to run this clip. He was on Hannity then and I talking about Joe Biden not being the candidate. | ||
| He's been saying this for months, if not years, that Joe Biden isn't going to be the candidate in 2024. | ||
| And I would put the likelihood that he's right at probably 60%. | ||
| It's very possible that Joe Biden is the candidate, but I think it's not going to happen. | ||
| If I was a betting man, I would put... | ||
| All my money on anyone else. | ||
| I don't know who it's going to be, whether it's going to be Michelle, whether it's going to be Hillary, whether it's going to be Gavin Newsom, or someone unexpected. | ||
| But I just cannot imagine the deep state wanting to install Biden again when it's just abundantly obvious that he's a decrepit old man with a rotting brain. | ||
| Let's go ahead and run the clip. Kamala Harris problem, because this is a party that is tied its very identity to identity politics. | ||
| She only got the job, let's be very honest, because of her race and gender. | ||
| I know you're not supposed to say that, but it's the truth. | ||
| And so if they're going to move Joe Biden out of the way, but they don't want Kamala Harris in that seat. | ||
| You're talking about democratic identity politics. That is a known fact. | ||
| That's the core. We're good to go. | ||
| But I do think that that is where we're headed. | ||
| And it's important for Republicans not to be complacent. | ||
| Right now, President Trump would run laps around Joe Biden. | ||
| This could be a Reagan-style landslide. | ||
| You look at that survey of independent voters and that focus group that tells you the same story I am seeing across this country, which is precisely because why I believe they're going to actually change it to someone other than Biden by the time we get to this summer. | ||
| Okay, now, I have no reason not to believe David Axelrod, but he was pretty strong in a statement saying Michelle's not running. | ||
| Okay, that then brings up the Gavin Newsom issue. | ||
| I've interviewed him. | ||
| I have pressed him. | ||
| I pressed him in the debate with Governor DeSantis on the issue of if he'd run. | ||
| He's been very clear that he's not next in line, that the person that would be next in line would be the Vice President Harris. | ||
| Okay, so how do you... | ||
| I guess push her out of the way and maybe go to Gavin if he would take it. | ||
| I'm taking him at his word that he said he really wouldn't take it. | ||
| Then you got to look at Gretchen Whitmer. | ||
| It's interesting that they are pushing out a book, is my understanding. | ||
| Over the summer, that seemed to be kind of spontaneous. | ||
| You think maybe she's been talked to or spoken to by people? | ||
| Well, the reality is even Hillary Clinton is now lightly criticizing Joe Biden. | ||
| God knows she wants the job. | ||
| I don't necessarily take David Axelrod at his word. | ||
| I do think that it may not even be Michelle Obama's choice. | ||
| The idea that just because she doesn't want to run doesn't mean they're gonna make her the nominee, I think are two separate and different questions. | ||
| But whatever it is, Sean, this is our moment to get ahead of that curve, not to play a guessing game. | ||
| I think the Republicans right now have an opportunity to own the message of national unity. | ||
| Seal that border. Democrat or Republican, most Americans agree on its importance. | ||
| Black or white, man or woman, it doesn't matter. | ||
| We agree. Nations have borders. | ||
| Merit beats DEI. That we gotta drill more, frack more. | ||
| Own the actual issues that allow us to unite this country. | ||
| And the more we get ahead of that curve, the more we say that we own the message of national unity. | ||
| Not Joe Biden who claimed to unite the country, but we the Republican Party. | ||
| There's a vague course coming out in support of Trump and making his claim as to why he thinks that Biden's going to be replaced and who he thinks it could potentially be. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And how am I going to frame this? | |
| I've said before on air that war has transitioned from war of conquest to war of conspiracy. | ||
| And we have so frequently and incessantly been the victims of government conspiracies basically since World War II. That I think part of the Great Awakening is not only this realization But it's the catalyzation, the fueling of our own conspiracy. | ||
| So if we are losing by conspiracy, then we have to fight back with conspiracy. | ||
| It's why I've said that the Second Amendment hasn't really applied to this corruption that we've seen, because it's not been a war fought on a front, but a war fought by conspiracy. | ||
| And what we saw from Vivek Was somebody who covertly, and he's never explicitly said this, this is just my interpretation. | ||
| Somebody who covertly ran against Trump, basically said nothing negative about Trump for the entirety of his campaign, and then handed all of his followers and all of his support to Trump. | ||
| This is the type of conspiracy that we need to be engaged in if we want to win against these globalists. | ||
|
unidentified
|
More on the other side. You're watching The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser. | |
| Watch live right now at band.video. | ||
| The rot is real. | ||
| America is deliberately being destroyed from within. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know if I'm tripping or not, but is that an upside down cross bro? | |
| As the expanse of the western United States has finally been breached. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's as if fentanyl is raining on our reservation. | |
| That I'll do anything to help. | ||
| Marvin Weatherwax Jr. | ||
| is a tribal leader here and says much of the drug activity on his reservation stems from Mexican cartels selling to community members and using their homes, often in remote areas, as distribution hubs. | ||
| Profit margins soar the further away from the Mexicans. | ||
| A single fentanyl pill that costs between 4 and 25 cents to produce in Mexico can be sold for 50 cents or a dollar in San Diego and over $100 on some reservations here in Montana. | ||
| Two years ago there were 19 police officers for the whole reservation. | ||
| So they sued the Bureau of Indian Affairs asking for help. | ||
| But no help arrived. | ||
| They now say they're down to seven officers. | ||
| The Blackfeet declared a state of emergency two years ago after 17 people overdosed, leaving four dead in just one week. | ||
| The drug problem on our reservation, it's so serious that it's... | ||
| Pretty much wiping out a generation. | ||
| Meanwhile, Democrat operatives are targeting black Americans that stray from their clutches of mind control. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now here's some photos from inside the Upper Midwest Law Center. | |
| That group has been in the news many times for the work they do, supported by conservatives. | ||
| The other conservative groups in the Golden Valley Office Building are the conservative think tank, the Center of the American Experiment, and Take Charge, a conservative group led by and centered on black Minnesotans. | ||
| Again, we've seen these patterns of behavior targeted on people, I guess, especially on what they believe in. | ||
| If it's not in the popular culture, it feels like they have a license to hunt. | ||
| And we need to make sure that that doesn't happen anymore. | ||
| Congressmen are barred from investigating issues at federally funded immigration centers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, we just wanted to come in and take a look if we could. | |
| We're down here. Natural Resources Committee had a hearing this week and just wanted to stop in and take a look at how this place is operating because we understand that you have a lot of migrants coming through here. | ||
| So unfortunately we're not allowed to let anybody that's not part of, you know, the employees and staff. | ||
| Hey ma'am. So we're not trespassing. | ||
| No, we're here as members of Congress and there are federal dollars that go into this operation, so we have oversight. | ||
| And we just want to go in and see what your operation looks like. | ||
| We ask for access here. | ||
| This is federally funded. | ||
| We believe that As members of Congress, me and Representative Lamolfa should be able to access. | ||
| But we will move on from here. | ||
| While foreigners declaring asylum ravaged the United States like it's their personal ATM machine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Cracked down on a Romanian organized crime ring accused of skimming more than $2 million from state-issued EBT cards in Orange County. | |
| 48 suspects under arrest, including one of Romania's most wanted criminals. | ||
| Prosecutors say a cell of criminals moved from town to town using stolen EBT card cash to buy baby formula, which is in dire need in Mexico. | ||
| Then they went down to Mexico to trade the formula with drug cartels. | ||
| Now three people with no U.S. IDs are taken into custody in Central Florida. | ||
| They are accused of stealing money from ATMs, and investigators say it's part of a bigger international crime problem. | ||
| All of these suspects are transient. | ||
| Detectives don't know where they live and in some cases don't even know their real names. | ||
| As we scoured through the arrest reports, we found three Romanian suspects from three different counties all charged with fraudulent credit card crimes at ATMs like this one. | ||
| Time for the United States is running out. | ||
| The rot is real and it is exponentially accelerating. | ||
| John Bowne reporting. | ||
| The rod is real, and we are on the brink of World War III with these allegations of Russian space nukes. | ||
| We did fire up an X space, so feel free to follow me on X at RealChaseGeyser. | ||
| Join the space. Request to speak. | ||
| We've taken speakers and reporting more news for the next two hours. | ||
| So stick with us, folks. | ||
| We're going to be back after one minute. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're watching the American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser. | |
| Watch live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser, your host. | ||
| We do have a 22-minute uninterrupted segment. | ||
| As the listeners on X may be unaware, we are broadcasting on live radio simultaneously to hosting this space. | ||
| And so every once in a while, we do have to take commercial breaks for the sake of our radio syndicates. | ||
| And so we will be taking speakers sort of throughout the show as people request and pop in. | ||
| Only thing I ask is that you please refrain from profanity in the space because we can get in trouble with some of the radio stations if any of that is broadcast on radio because of some of the decency laws around that. | ||
| So we've been talking this morning about the allegations of space nukes, how this could be used. | ||
| To get NATO into war with Russia because technically it would be a violation of the Outer Space Treaty of 1967. | ||
| We've been talking about Biden's potential replacement and all the other details around just sort of the general level of incompetence that we are witnessing from this administration. | ||
| And it's such that I pretty much have an opinion on everything almost immediately. | ||
| Oftentimes my opinion is wrong because I'm Flawed and foolish, just like everybody else is flawed and foolish. | ||
| But I'm the type of person, personality-wise, who can pretty much render an opinion immediately. | ||
| When I go to a restaurant, it takes me like five seconds to decide what I want to order. | ||
| When I bought my first house, I walked in, and in five minutes I said, okay, this is what I want to make an offer on. | ||
| I just make big decisions quickly, right? | ||
| And when it comes to this... | ||
| Level of just how terrible this administration has been. | ||
| The thing that baffles me, the thing that I can't decide, and I'd be interested to hear what everybody thinks about this. | ||
| What I can't determine is whether or not this administration is failing so miserably because it's incompetent or whether it's failing so miserably because it's Basically acting against, intentionally acting against the interests of the American people. | ||
| And the first thing that sort of, not the first thing, but one of the big things that raised my eyebrows about this administration was it repeatedly has claimed that it doesn't have the resources that it needs to protect the southern border, which we know isn't true. | ||
| We know it somehow manages to come up with tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars for Ukraine. | ||
| It repeatedly claims that it doesn't have the resources to protect our border. | ||
| And then when states like Texas come out and say, fine, if you can't do it, we will do it. | ||
| The Biden administration doesn't respond by, thank you for your help. | ||
| Sorry, we couldn't be more helpful. | ||
| Like you would expect a federal government charged with the task of protecting a border of its nation. | ||
| But it responds by lawfare, lawsuits, condemnations, criticisms, calls of humanitarian crisis at our border. | ||
| Right? So it proved that it's not failing to protect the southern border. | ||
| This administration is, in fact, sponsoring the crisis intentionally. | ||
| And so that's just one example. | ||
| That's just one issue. But then you got to ask yourself, is... | ||
| Is this applying to every issue that we have? | ||
| I mean, is it the case that this administration is failing to prevent World War III? Or is it in fact sponsoring the onset or the escalation of World War III? That's the question that I have. | ||
| And I'd be interested to hear what Timothy Lassley has to say about it. | ||
| He just requested to speak here on the X-Base. | ||
| Tim, go ahead and unmute yourself. | ||
| Do you think that this administration is just incompetent or intentional in this sort of disaster that is its leadership? | ||
| I believe it's severely intentional. | ||
| In fact, Chase, we were born into an agenda. | ||
| This isn't happenstance at all. | ||
| I mean, they wrote books, they wrote manuals, they trained everybody, they set up colleges to instruct everybody, make sure that they were in lockstep. | ||
| They did Operation Lockstep. | ||
| This isn't happenstance, this isn't incompetence. | ||
| These are trained professionals in democides. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah. And the thing is, you know, it's funny because for a long time, have you ever heard the expression, I'm sure you have, those who can't do teach? | ||
| There's something that's just said kind of about... | ||
| Educators and professors and teachers, generally speaking, and I think it also applies to politicians, but if you can't run a small business, then you get involved in government, right? | ||
| That was sort of the big thing, but I think we underestimate because these people are so ignorant of everything else and what it's actually like to be an American and what it's like to actually run a business. | ||
| These leaders are so ignorant of that that we underestimate how proficient they are at corruption, at politics. | ||
| It's not easy to be as corrupt and conniving and Sort of conceiving as they are. | ||
| One thing that we tend to leave out of the equation is the satanic ritual abuse that these people have suffered. | ||
| And we're expecting them to have a human reaction, but that's been removed from them by force, by abuse, by trauma. | ||
| And so once they're presented to the world, they're basically an automaton. | ||
| And they're only there for response and stimuli. | ||
| I don't really think that we're dealing with functioning human beings to the point where they have common sense and they can think on their own and make decisions. | ||
| I think they're satanically virtually abused and it's just one of those factors we have to come to grips with. | ||
| Let's expand on that a little bit because the word satanic has been thrown around a lot. | ||
| Obviously, we see it played out in pop culture, in media, these themes. | ||
| I can't tell you how many just examples of sort of weird satanic stuff we see, especially in music videos. | ||
| It seems to be really integrated into the music business, even more than Hollywood, but also in Hollywood. | ||
| Tell me... The extent to which you think that satanic rituals are actually occurring, not just with actors and musicians, but explicit satanic rituals, not just Satan's influence, but explicit satanic rituals in terms of honor our political leaders. | ||
| I'd say it's more than 60% of our current political leaders. | ||
| Most of them are subjected to it. | ||
| I don't see how the cabal let these gaps exist. | ||
| I think they were very concise in their development of this plan, and they made sure that they had everybody trained. | ||
| I mean, this is going on for over 100 years. | ||
| I mean, the Odd Fellows, everything. | ||
| I mean, it's just complete darkness. | ||
| So, it's... | ||
| As far as how many of them have been involved in this, it's hard to say, but still at the same time, what I'd like to emphasize is the fact that most of our culture has been rendered into either a satanic ritual or so close to it that the next step, the next part of the stimuli that they get to, it's kind of like a binary weapon. | ||
| It operates in stages. | ||
| So... I mean, it's significant. | ||
| I mean, most of the United States is involved in darkness right now. | ||
| Most of it. You know, and there's a lot of cognitive dissonance and confusion. | ||
| And with that mass formation, and you're trying to get... | ||
| Like, let's just talk about the politicians. | ||
| Even if they weren't mechanically, ritually abused. | ||
| The mass formation that people are subjected to, and once it dements itself in the brain, you start getting opposing stimuli, different thoughts coming in. | ||
| And when they entertain those, a pain response happens. | ||
| Yeah. Well, and one of the things that I think is interesting is just when you think about the story of Jesus saying to Peter, get behind me Satan, right? | ||
| It's a famous story. It shows, too, that Satanism isn't just sort of this Aleister Crowley ritual Hollywood thing. | ||
| It is that, too. But it's also, in my opinion, just Satan's influence on people, culture, organizations, and processes, right? | ||
| So Peter comes out and basically says he doesn't want Jesus to have to die and sacrifice himself. | ||
| And Jesus says, get behind me, Satan. | ||
| Of course, Peter is appalled. | ||
| But that is the adversary at work. | ||
| Anything that discourages or inhibits or interferes or sets itself up as an obstacle of God's plan for mankind is by definition Satanism. | ||
| It's the adversary. | ||
| So on the one hand, we use the term Satanism. | ||
| We think about these Rituals and pentagrams and weird cults and things like that. | ||
| And that sort of thing is going on for sure. | ||
| But what's even more bothersome to me is sort of discrete, insidious nature in which Satan works in the hearts and minds of all mankind. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Mark Passio called it de facto Satanism. | |
| And that term really works. | ||
| It's just basically we're back to Satanists to a large extent as a nation because of what we were born into. | ||
| We were born into a concentration camp agenda. | ||
| It was supposed to get the boomers to a certain point of acceptance and then collapse slowly, surely. | ||
| It's the collapse of 1893, the Great Depression, all of these other historically changing events. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was all done by design. Thanks, Timothy. | |
| I appreciate that. I want to give Free Texas News a chance to speak. | ||
| If you're still there, Free Texas, go ahead and unmute yourself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you have to say? Yeah, Chase, hey, great to meet you in the convoy line. | |
| Yeah, I remember you. That's why I called on you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Did you see the promo video, which we plugged you? | |
| Oh, yeah, I just dropped it in the pill. | ||
| I had it pinned for a bit. Yeah, it was real fun, man, to see myself. | ||
| And I was like that other guy. I was like, if I could see myself on InfoWars, I'll die. | ||
| No word of a lie! | ||
| That's right. Yeah. | ||
| Hey, I mean, you know, I was going to double down on what Timothy said there. | ||
| I mean, you just can't do this many things that have deleterious effects on accident. | ||
| You could have flipped a coin over the last... | ||
| 20 years, over the last five years especially, and had better outcomes than what we've seen. | ||
| And, you know, it's unfortunate, you know, because it's causing a lot of divisions in my personal life too. | ||
| Actually causing the end of my relationship where the only place I go that I'm told I'm crazy is home, you know, but I'm out talking to other people. | ||
| They're seeing the same thing. | ||
| And then to go home and be told, The world I'm seeing is not true and that I'm now maybe some sort of extremist. | ||
| And I think that's the beginning of a type of cold civil war that's happening that's dividing people along family and, you know, along standing relationship lines. | ||
| But at a certain point, you've got to stand up. | ||
| Yeah. And realize we've got to move forward and have the courage to call the things as we see it, to seek the community and start local, right? | ||
| Like, look in your immediate circle, start speaking and spreading the truth and not being allowed to be deceived by the lies that are being pumped at us. | ||
| And it's It's heartbreaking, you know? | ||
| But we've got to have that courage, I believe. | ||
| Well, you know, I'm sorry to hear that you have had some issues with your relationship as a result of this. | ||
| You know, I covered this a couple of months ago, a few months ago. | ||
| My best friend of 10 years basically reached out to me and said that he didn't want to be associated with me anymore, I think because I work for Alex Jones. | ||
| And it's a terrible thing to experience something like that, but We can't really choose what we believe. | ||
| We can choose what we say and what we do. | ||
| But belief is something that occurs naturally as a symptom of experience and contemplation. | ||
| Right? So the more you experience or the more you research and the more you contemplate... | ||
| The more likely you are to believe something that is true, but the belief in it is not a choice. | ||
| I mean, if it was a choice whether to believe in God or not, many people who are atheists would choose to believe in God. | ||
| I know that if I were an atheist, I'm not. | ||
| I would want it to be true. | ||
| I would wish that it were true that God existed. | ||
| And so if it was a simple matter of belief, then I would just choose to believe it. | ||
| A simple matter of choice than I would just choose to believe it. | ||
| So that's why we have to be gracious and accepting and understanding. | ||
| Not necessarily tolerant or complicit in, but we have to be humble enough about our own beliefs that we don't alienate good people who believe the wrong thing. | ||
| And that's something that we see disproportionately from the left. | ||
| We see the left... Terminate friendships and relationships over political difference statistically more often than the right. | ||
| There's research and studies that show this. | ||
| And it's such a self-righteous thing to do to eliminate someone from your life, not because of who they are, but because of what they believe. | ||
| I mean, that is some deep-rooted evil. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What are your thoughts on that? Yeah, and that's how I, you know, there's definitely a hole in my heart, but being demonized in your own home, And trying with compassion for years to continue to bring information that continues to be proven true and at a certain point, it was too much for me, unfortunately, to, you know... | |
| To keep going and just like, well, you know, anyway, I don't want to go down that route. | ||
| Yeah, it's okay. I just want to say, man, from my experience, and maybe you've had this experience too, the worst things that happen to us always end up being the best things down the road. | ||
| That's been my experience. And so sorry that you had this experience, but I think that you're going to find in retrospect after some time passes that it was actually a really good thing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's what I'm hoping, man. I appreciate the good words. | |
| I love you, dude. Let's hear from Michael Sullivan. | ||
| Michael Sullivan has requested to speak. | ||
| Go ahead and unmute yourself and share what you have to say if you're still with us in the space. | ||
| Michael, are you there? Looks like he may have walked away after he requested to speak. | ||
| So what I'm going to do is I'm going to add Clown Car as a speaker. | ||
| Clown Car, as soon as you get connected here in the X space, go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you've got to say. | ||
| In the meantime, what I'm going to do is... | ||
| Just briefly mention how silly it is that Huma Abedin is now dating George Soros. | ||
| You guys see that? Go ahead, Clown Car. | ||
| Or, Michael, are you there? Looks like Michael's back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, I am. Very good. | |
| Can you hear me? Yes. Yeah, to your question, and I think you know the answer. | ||
| You know that they're doing it on purpose. | ||
| And this goes back to Biden being a keynote speaker at the World Economic Forum or him sitting up on stage and Klaus Schwab is saying the problem is the middle class, especially of the United States. | ||
| And Biden sits there and nods. | ||
| And he passes, he tries to pass legislation and bills entitled Build Back Better. | ||
| I mean, they're using the same slogans as the World Economic Forum. | ||
| So here's the problem. | ||
| The problem is that Klaus Schwab has taken over half of the governments of the world, including the Democrat Party of the United States. | ||
| And the level of treason is so high and there's so many committing it that it's almost like it's null and void. | ||
| Or it's going to come to a point in our history where we have some kind of civil war And we have to deal with it. | ||
| But the problem is, is that it is purposeful. | ||
| It is intentional. | ||
| And Trump is not doing a good, and I've called in before on this, Trump is not doing a good job of educating the public. | ||
| I mean, he'll get up there and he'll do like little one-liners. | ||
| Like, you know, it's like they hate our country. | ||
| Well, OK, Trump, let's let's unpack that and educate the citizens of the United States so we know what we're up against. | ||
| And he simply will not do it. | ||
| And that is going to be his Zionism and this problem right here, his inability to articulate it, which Vivek is excellent. | ||
| If he's our vice president, great. | ||
| Tear him loose to do the job that Trump is just not able to do or doesn't want to do. | ||
| I'm not sure. What are your thoughts on that? | ||
| So I'm going to push back a little bit. | ||
| I don't entirely disagree with you. | ||
| But let me put it to you in perspective this way. | ||
| We've had Alex Jones on air for years. | ||
| I think was it 30 years in April with Infowars specifically a number of years before that for three hours a day early on he was doing six hours a day because he was doing three hours of public access TV and he was doing three hours of radio early on. | ||
| So this is somebody who has come to prominence speaking for hours every day for decades to a large audience About the awareness of these issues. | ||
| And there's a difference between... | ||
| Like a... | ||
| I don't want to... | ||
| You got John the Baptist and then you got Jesus, right? | ||
| And I'm not trying to compare Trump to Jesus. | ||
| I'm just using this as a metaphor, an allegory, okay? | ||
| You've got the guy with the bullhorn who makes everybody aware... | ||
| Of what's going on. | ||
| And then you have the leader who comes in and leads the aware people to the light, right? | ||
| So that's the way I see it. | ||
| It's so difficult for a political candidate Whose real purpose is to just get as much support as possible to simultaneously explain complicated conspiracies and issues to a general populace that may not be the best at understanding nuance and complicated issues. | ||
| I mean, how... How easy is it in 60 seconds to explain the Federal Reserve and fractional reserve banking to the general populace? | ||
| It's like impossible to do that, right? | ||
| But that's like one of the major fundamental issues that has catalyzed our current corruption and political dynamic and all the wars that we're in and the petrodollar. | ||
| I mean, you have to spend hours every day talking about it. | ||
| You have to write tarmacs. Holmes explaining it, and you have to do investigations. | ||
| Like, Trump is just trying to get as much support as possible. | ||
| He knows what the issue is, but he knows if he just tells people what the issue is, that's not the same thing as getting people to vote for him or winning people over. | ||
| You know what I mean? He's got to market himself. | ||
| He's got to have that 30-second... | ||
| He's got to have the elevator pitch, you know? | ||
| Because you've only got 60 seconds to win these votes at a time, you know? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right, right. I think the issue is with Trump, why he doesn't get deep into it, is because he knows that the media would spin it and make him a conspiracy theorist. | |
| And he may lose votes that way, and so I think you're right. | ||
| He would rather outsource that to InfoWars and Roger Stone and Vivek. | ||
| And that's my only other guess. | ||
| I wish he would do it more instead of writing a coffee table book with a bunch of pictures. | ||
| But yeah, in the long run, you're probably right. | ||
| It's probably a strategic move on his part. | ||
| Well, Michael, it's always a pleasure to speak with you. | ||
| Make sure you guys check him out on X and check out his book as well. | ||
| Thank you so much for tuning in. | ||
| So we've got about two and a half minutes left. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. I was going to say, I sent you a copy of my book and the movie script, but it got returned to me because I guess I sent it to the wrong address. | |
| I need to mail it to the P.O. Box, right? | ||
| Just send me a direct message. I'll send you my personal address. | ||
| Just don't show up on Christmas. | ||
| Take it easy. Alright, so we've got two minutes left before we cut to radio break. | ||
| I want to invite Kyle to unmute himself and say what he's got to say, but just please note that I am going to have to cut everybody off in about two minutes for our radio commercial break, and then we'll come back right after that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead, Kyle. Hey, can you hear me? | |
| Yes, sir. Hey, so I just wanted to touch on something you said to the other caller about not believing something that someone else believes and trying not to alienate others. | ||
| I wanted to really quick read 2 John 1, 9-11. | ||
| Whosoever transgresseth and abides not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God. | ||
| He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. | ||
| If there come any unto you and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God's speed. | ||
| For he that biddeth him God's speed is partaker of his evil deeds. | ||
| Yeah, but at the same time it says pray for your enemies. | ||
| At the same time, there's all sorts of conflicts in the Bible. | ||
| I mean, if you look at... | ||
| And I'm not saying that that's a flaw. | ||
| I think it's a feature, okay? | ||
| If you look at the Ten Commandments, it says, Thou shall not kill. | ||
| And then if you look at Ecclesiastes, it says there's a time to kill. | ||
| And then you have Jesus in the Gospel saying things like this, right? | ||
| Don't let somebody in your house. | ||
| Don't wish them Godspeed. And then you have, on the other hand, Jesus saying, Turn the other cheek and pray for your enemies. | ||
| So what we have to do is we have to... | ||
| Live in the space where these conflicts collide because that's where the wisdom is. | ||
| So I'm not saying that we should endorse allowing snakes into our homes or that we should be so tolerant of these human beings who are suffering from gender dysphoria that we allow them to babysit our children and work in their schools and teach them. | ||
| I'm not advocating for that level of acceptance. | ||
| I'm just saying that as human beings... | ||
| We should always work to find compassion and understanding in our hearts even when dealing with evil men. | ||
| Thank you so much. I'm sorry to cut you guys off. | ||
| We will be taking more speakers on the other side of this four-minute break from the radio. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser. | |
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| We are back live on radio and in X Spaces on the American Journal. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser. I'm your host today. | ||
| Harrison Smith will be hosting the War Room this afternoon and Owen Schroer will be hosting the Alex Jones show in about 90 minutes from now. | ||
| We are taking call speakers in the space periodically and covering the news as well. | ||
| One thing I want to point out, Klaus Schwab, before I go to these speakers, Rebrands the Great Reset claims globalists want humanocracy instead of technocracy. | ||
| So we've seen Alex Jones coming out speaking against technocrats and technocracy for years. | ||
| We've seen him have a conversation with Elon Musk... | ||
| Right when he got his account, when Jones got his account back, the one where it was Elon Musk explicitly as Elon Musk, about team humanity. | ||
| And now it's interesting to me that we see Klaus Schwab coming out and talking about humanocracy instead of technocracy. | ||
| This seems a little bit like a psyop, like they're trying to sort of Just like they stole the rainbow as a symbol, just like they steal words and sort of redefine them and then use them like racist and sexist and Nazi. | ||
| They just take those words that have powerful energy and then they rebrand them and reuse them for their own will. | ||
| It seems like they're trying to take... | ||
| The love of humanity itself and rebrand it for their sort of subversive means. | ||
| I'd be interested to hear what everybody has to say. | ||
| The first person I want to go to, and I want to remind everybody in the space, I know that typically on exit spaces you can say whatever, use whatever words you want, but we are broadcasting to radio, so please. | ||
| Avoid using profanity so we don't get in trouble with our radio syndicates because the laws around profanity on the radio can result in findings and things like that. | ||
| But I want to hear from Alex420. | ||
| If you're still with us, I know you've been waiting to speak for some time. | ||
| What are your thoughts on this news that Klaus Schwab is rebranding the Great Reset as humanocracy instead of technocracy? | ||
| Alex, are you there? Okay, we're going to move on because I don't think he's there with us anymore. | ||
| But let's hear from God of this world. | ||
| God of this world, can you unmute yourself and tell us what you think? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello, are you there? | |
| Yes. I'm just watching a terrible... | ||
| This is terrible. | ||
| We have an NFL going with Taylor Swift slamming drinks with some young thing and children being murdered and 500,000 dead Ukrainians on the other side of the world, which is really all one world now. | ||
| Yeah. But... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just quickly, I want to be honest. | |
| I've been on Alex's products for 10 years, starting with the iodine and everything else. | ||
| And by the way, the new foundational plus the nitric boost is the bomb. | ||
| Anyway, the biggest problem is pornography and the easy access to pornography. | ||
| That has to be stopped, in my opinion. | ||
| Yeah, it's not healthy. That's just what I think. | ||
| I think if we could start there, I think people would be shocked because you can't unsee that. | ||
| And I unfortunately saw that at an early age and it distracted me for years. | ||
| Yeah. So, in my opinion, but thank you so much for everything you do and I I watch you every day, Chase, so you're awesome. | ||
| Thank you so much. I appreciate you. | ||
| You're welcome. And thank you for taking the time to chime in and share those thoughts. | ||
| I think it's very important that we sometimes just take a moment and really feel the weight of some of these issues that we're so easily desensitized to just because of their abundance. | ||
| Next up, let's hear from Curtis Whiteside. | ||
| Curtis, are you there? If so, go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you have to say. | ||
| All right, I'm not seeing Curtis unmute himself, so I'm gonna go on and dive in on this Klaus Schwab story here. | ||
| The World Economic Forum founder, Klaus Schwab, rebranded his Great Reset System as humanocracy rather than a technocracy during the annual World Government Summit. | ||
| So he was speaking at this annual summit, I believe it was just last week, and we showed on this very network clips of him Discussing the New World Order, which is what he's basically been in the business of doing for the last 50 years. | ||
| And what was most fascinating to me, it was a great moment on this very show with Harrison diving in and analyzing the clip, is that we have Klaus Schwab admitting that he is using ChatGPT to help outline and define and strategize The New World Order. | ||
| What is it going to look like? | ||
| What are the steps? He's literally giving speeches talking about how he showed ChatGPT, he discussed, conversed with ChatGPT for hours. | ||
| He's interacting with artificial intelligence to attempt to establish and basically manufacture the... | ||
| New world order. | ||
| So as he's becoming more technocratic, literally more technocratic, he is walking back the technocratic brand towards this sort of human brand. | ||
| So they're trying to make this artificial intelligence Up here, even like superhuman, more human than human itself, right? | ||
| We're not going to think of it as a machine. | ||
| We're going to think of it as a superhuman, something that's superior to us. | ||
| You know, it's fascinating. | ||
| Last night I was trying to fall asleep, and I often have a hard time falling asleep just because my mind's buzzing. | ||
| And I was watching on HBO this Steve Jobs documentary from some time ago. | ||
| I can't remember the name of it. | ||
| But it was really very good. | ||
| Steve Jobs is someone who I've studied. | ||
| I read Walter Isaacson's biography of him. | ||
| I really paid attention and have paid attention to Steve Jobs, especially since I was a small business owner. | ||
| I started a business in 2016, so I consumed a lot of that sort of San Francisco startup type literature, whether it was Peter Thiel's Zero to One, Tim Ferriss' podcast. | ||
| All sorts of just hyper-productivity focused stuff, business stuff. | ||
| I read it all and I listened to it all. | ||
| And in this documentary about Steve Jobs, they're talking about the way computers used to be perceived and how Steve Jobs changed that from a marketing perspective. | ||
| And we think of this guy as this brilliant tech guy, but really he's a brilliant marketer. | ||
| He's a brilliant advertiser. He is incredible at influencing computers. | ||
| First responding to an existing zeitgeist in such a way that he can determine the next zeitgeist. | ||
| So there's always a spirit of the times. | ||
| Every generation has its own fashion, its own clothes, its own style. | ||
| And that spirit of the times changes based on external factors and just the natural development and evolution of a culture. | ||
| And to be able to determine how to resonate with an existing zeitgeist in order to determine what the next one is going to be is an incredibly powerful thing of which I think there's been no greater master than Steve Jobs, regardless of whether you think he's a good person or not. | ||
| I mean, he's a brilliant marketer, right? | ||
| And what he realized was that computers were these massive machines. | ||
| They were intimidating. | ||
| They were associated with nerds. | ||
| People were afraid of them. | ||
| And what they needed to do was make the computer not seem like a machine, but seem like an extension of yourself. | ||
| So you're not interacting with technology. | ||
| You're actually interacting with the version of yourself that you wish to become. | ||
| That was sort of the branding message. | ||
| And he actually, I believe, coined the term personal computer. | ||
| The machine is not an extension of you. | ||
| It is not a tool of yours. | ||
| It is you. | ||
| And that resulted in astronomical sales, an entire shift in culture. | ||
| And now we've arrived at this place where we are on a threshold of a new zeitgeist, a new era, a new basically age of mankind. | ||
| Totally unprecedented like nothing we've ever seen before and we have to determine how we move from this zeitgeist to the next one. | ||
| We have to determine what that next one is going to be and there are some major players trying to influence this and this is what Klaus Schwab has been astoundingly successful at doing himself. | ||
| He realized that As the world was reaching sort of this globalization, that it was not the zeitgeist of the people he needed to concern himself with, but the zeitgeist specifically of his target market, which is members of the political class. | ||
| So he is determining how our politicians feel about things, regardless of how we feel about things, because after all, we don't have any power. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We're going to go to a four-minute break for radio. | ||
| We'll be right back, taking speakers into space. | ||
| We'll be right back. Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser, your host today. | ||
| Harrison Smith will be hosting The War Room this afternoon, and Owen Schroer will be hosting The Alex Jones Show in just about an hour. | ||
| I see that Harrison Smith has joined the X-Space as a speaker. | ||
| So I'd like to ask him, Harrison, what's it like to be a guest on your own show? | ||
| Can you unmute yourself and share your thoughts? | ||
| thoughts what's on your mind today i'm not sure if he is with us or not it looks like he might have stepped away from his phone just briefly i know that he spends a lot of time with family when he is away from the office and so he i don't even know if he's in yet he might be sitting over in his office getting ready for the show this afternoon harrison if you ever want to speak just go ahead and unmute yourself i leave the floor of course open to you especially since this is your show but if you can't speak i understand but we were talking oh go ahead what's up harrison | ||
| Hey, how's it going? | ||
| Not much, man. I'm just laying in bed, enjoying the show. | ||
| For the first time as a spaces participant, I just wanted to see what it was like. | ||
| What are we talking about today? | ||
| Well, the first hour we dove into these allegations that Russia has space nukes or is planning to have space nukes. | ||
| And I'm basically making the claim that I think they're trying to set Russia up for technically violating the 1967 Outer Space Treaty that prohibits all of these main nations from putting nuclear weapons in orbit. | ||
| As an excuse to get NATO to basically get involved explicitly in the war in Ukraine before Ukraine completely loses the war. | ||
| That was the first thing. Now we've been going into how Klaus Schwab is trying to rebrand technocracy as humanocracy all in the context of bragging about his use of ChatGPT in order to plan the new world order. | ||
| The humanocracy. | ||
| Well, yeah, it's all insane. | ||
| I mean, the whole Russia fear-mongering thing is way too convenient for the Ukraine bill having to pass and suddenly these rumors of something very dangerous happening. | ||
| I couldn't even follow it yesterday because it all seems so scripted and planned out with like every hour there'd be some new person coming out and saying, oh, yes, it is absolutely real. | ||
| Completely ridiculous. But I'll let you get back to the show. | ||
| I will continue to enjoy it here in the Twitter space. | ||
| But I will be hosting War Room later today and a little special gift, a little special... | ||
| We're going to be filming a new skit after the show today. | ||
| So I'll be working on that before War Room. | ||
| Then we're going to film it after. And so probably by the end of this week or next week, we're going to have a brand new pitch meeting published on Bandai Video and stuff. | ||
| So stay tuned for that, folks. | ||
| But yeah, thanks for letting me come on and take it away, Chase. | ||
| Awesome. Awesome. I love those pitch meeting clips. | ||
| I've been anxiously waiting for another one. | ||
| It is long overdue, so I'm excited to see that and hear about the concept behind that. | ||
| But, yeah, I mean, what we saw... | ||
| He's exactly right. It did seem scripted, what we saw yesterday. | ||
| Basically, one entity came out and said, there is a secret, but I can't tell you what it is. | ||
| It's like, well, then why did you tell me there was a secret? | ||
| That's the first thing that happened. | ||
| Then the second thing that happens is all these leaks of the details of the secret. | ||
| So... Obviously, there was this coordinated leaking of this information. | ||
| Regardless of whether it's true, there was this coordinated leak of these allegations that Russia either has or is planning to have space nukes. | ||
| And it seems just abundantly obvious to me that they're trying to set them up for accusations that they violated the 1967 space treaty. | ||
| I wish people, and frankly, I'll be honest with you, I didn't even know That there was a 1967 treaty regarding nukes in space. | ||
| Until I started looking into this apparent PSYOP yesterday. | ||
| And if I didn't know, as somebody who pays attention to politics every day for hours a day, that means that the general populace doesn't. | ||
| I mean, how many people could you walk up to on the street and ask if they know the details of what the space treaty was in the 60s during the Cold War? | ||
| They've never heard of it. It's not something that's just abundantly covered. | ||
| Obviously, they know what the Cold War generally was, but these specifics are left out. | ||
| To me, it's like, how do we wake the people up to some of these details that would totally change their perspective and their political positions on major issues, whether or not they support war against Russia, whether or not they vote for Biden versus Trump. | ||
| I mean, this is the implications for humanity itself are tremendous. | ||
| When it comes to how the people of the world, especially the people of the United States, but the people of the world perceive organizations like the World Economic Forum. | ||
| I mean, if we could make everyone hate that organization, if we could make everyone realize that NATO or the UN should be abolished, if we could make everybody realize that national sovereignty is actually more conducive to peace than globalism, because the only way globalism can manifest is through world war. | ||
| It takes a world war In order to establish a new world order. | ||
| I want to go to TenPointSword in the space. | ||
| I was pleased to be in a Discord channel with him last Friday for a great podcast, TMI. TenPointSword, go ahead and unmute yourself if you feel like speaking. | ||
| I know that typically you prefer to mine. | ||
| What is on your mind? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I just wanted to talk about the Russia... | |
| Space nuke thing because it seems as though X, or rather SpaceX, Elon Musk has launched six pretty much anti-hypersonic missile satellites. | ||
| And the thing of it is, I keep reading the article, I know that Russia hasn't actually deployed any of theirs, but we are deploying ours. | ||
| So it seems... | ||
| Weird there. I cannot imagine after all the things that we have seen from our own government, going back to how we got involved in Vietnam, how we got involved in Iraq, how we got involved in Afghanistan, how we got involved in Libya, all these countless coups and unseating of governments and the corruption and the wars. | ||
| I cannot imagine That our own government has made the decision not to put nukes in space because, well, we said we weren't gonna. | ||
| It's like, of course we've got this technology. | ||
| Of course everybody violated this treaty. | ||
| Nobody trusts anybody in this international community and nobody should trust anybody because everybody in leadership is just constantly lying. | ||
| So, yeah, everything that we accuse the enemy of, one of the great replies to my tweet yesterday... | ||
| Everything being accused by the establishment is a mirror, right? | ||
| So they are guilty of everything that they say their opposition does. | ||
| So they call us domestic terrorists. | ||
| Oh, it's because they are domestic terrorists. | ||
| They say that Donald Trump is colluding with Russia. | ||
| Oh, they're actually the ones colluding. | ||
| They call us Nazis. Oh, they're actually the ones giving standing ovations for Nazis in Canadian Parliament, right? | ||
| So it really is true that what you hear from the state, what you hear from the mainstream media is is a mirror of what they're actually doing. | ||
| And as soon as you point that out, they do everything they can to silence you and imprison you and render you neutered. | ||
| I want to hear from Max, who I've just given speaker access in the space. | ||
| Max, what is on your mind? | ||
| Looks like he might not be there. | ||
| TenPoint, did you have something else you wanted to say? | ||
| I saw you unmuted yourself. Oh, yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've noticed that they've been sort of getting on Trump's case about the fact that he came out and said, oh, if you don't pay your dues in NATO, we're just going to let you, we're going to leave you to the wolves. | |
| And they were really getting on his case about that. | ||
| But to me, it doesn't seem like it's that bad of an issue. | ||
| If you don't pay, you don't get in the union. | ||
| I mean, that's the whole point of a union. | ||
| Yeah, do your part. | ||
| But what they want, this is why it's so complicated. | ||
| And this goes back to when Michael Sullivan was a speaker in this space. | ||
| It is very hard to explain to the public why and how these things are happening. | ||
| So, when you look at the disproportionate amount of funding in all of our trade agreements, the money that we pump into the international community, it's very obvious just as a citizen, as an individual, like, hey, this doesn't make sense. | ||
| This is not how I manage my budget at home. | ||
| Why is our government doing this? But on the other hand, the dollar as the global reserve currency is dependent on the demand for dollars. | ||
| So, As a national security sort of measure, they want to pump as much money as possible into the global economy because the way they see it, those dollars always eventually come back to them, and it's how they sort of fuel in this recursive manner this Ponzi scheme that they've set up with the way that our fractional reserve banking is. | ||
| I see Travis is raising his hand in the space. | ||
| Travis, go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you've got to say, man. | ||
| Are you with us, Travis? | ||
| Looks like he hasn't unmuted him, so I still got his hand raised, though. | ||
| We'll go back to him whenever he is ready. | ||
| Oh, you try to raise his hand again. | ||
| Go ahead and unmute yourself, Travis. You just tap the button in the bottom left, and you should be able to speak. | ||
| I guess he's just waving. | ||
| Okay, we will move on then in that case to some of these other developments, but we are going to come up on a radio break here in a second. | ||
| So I want to take this opportunity to plug a little bit. | ||
| Now is more important of a time than ever to support the Infowar. | ||
| We are in probably the most pivotal and important and consequential election of U.S. history. | ||
| We are in a war with globalists. | ||
| And it is People like you and listeners going to InfoWarsStored.com that kept us on life support when we were banned everywhere. | ||
| But now that we're back on X, we're trying to ramp everything up. | ||
| up, so make sure you check out all of our great products at Infowarsstore.com so we can take this Infowar to the next level together. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The American Journal, where Chase Geyser bridges the gap between America's past, present, I just want to be the best! | |
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| I am Chase Geyser, your host today. | ||
| Harrison Smith will be hosting The War Room this afternoon. | ||
| And Owen Short will be hosting the Alex Jones Show in one hour. | ||
| Now, this is a short sort of five-minute segment, so we're going to go to some speakers and then one more one-minute break before the long segment. | ||
| Thank you for being patient with these ad interruptions because we still are broadcasting on radio, so every once in a while we have to abide by the schedule of radio. | ||
| I see that Parson is raising their hand. | ||
| Parson, go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you've got to say, and then we're going to go to Travis after that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, thank you very much for having me up and coming to me. | |
| I'm driving down snow-covered roads in Metro Detroit on I-75. | ||
| About 35 miles an hour. | ||
| So, listen, I'm glad I found you guys. | ||
| I like the show, from what I've heard of it, I wanted to talk a little bit about the Russian missile program. | ||
| So, when we're talking about their new ICBM, the SAP-2, referred to by NATO as SATAN-2, since just over a year now, they have made operational over 50 of these units. | ||
| They don't have a need for putting nuclear missiles in space. | ||
| These missiles are the most capable ICBMs and rated by everybody. | ||
| The previous version was rated the best ICBM in the world. | ||
| This unit has three different payloads that it can carry. | ||
| One is a mega country killer. | ||
| I think it's 50 megatons. | ||
| Then it also has a version that carries 11. | ||
| Now, keep in mind that in the other two versions, they're using hypersonic second stages. | ||
| What makes this missile even more difficult for the U.S. in detection is it takes a very narrow, it actually goes south and comes around the South Pole up. | ||
| Into the States. | ||
| I'm getting off the highway. I'm not driving on this crap. | ||
| Well, I just want to say it's interesting to me because we see these accusations of space nukes in the context of apparently there was some sort of We're good to go. | ||
| But that the nukes in space or the weapons in space could be used to just sort of take down other satellites. | ||
| And of course, we're dependent on satellites for more than just military applications. | ||
| A lot of it has to do with the internet and communication applications and things of that nature. | ||
| So if Russia is able suddenly to just sort of eradicate all other satellites, then that could be a major sort of threat on our very infrastructure itself, regardless of whether or not there's a nuclear exchange on the planet. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I actually was in a space last night with an engineer in this field, and he said, well, anyone, even the U.S., could do this. | |
| If you're in a geosynchronous orbit, and that's your target, you crash one satellite into another satellite, and basically you end up creating a chain where it'll eliminate everything in that same sector. | ||
| You don't even need an actual weapon. | ||
| You can just position a satellite. | ||
| And to intersect with another one, you know, there's no armor on these things. | ||
| They're very light. | ||
| So I'll land with there. | ||
| I know you have a lot of other speakers in a short time before we get to the long part of this program, which I'm looking forward to. | ||
| Thank you so much for your call, and please drive safely. | ||
| I grew up in central Illinois, so not quite as bad as Detroit, but I know what snowy roads are like, so be as safe as you can. | ||
| I see that Harrison is raising his hand. | ||
| Harrison, we're going to cut to you after this break, because I want to give you enough time to say what you've got to say. | ||
| We're about ready to come up on the one-minute break that comes after the first five minutes of every hour, but then we will be on a 22 or 23-minute uninterrupted segment. | ||
| Make sure in the meantime that you guys... | ||
| Follow InfoWars, which we've made a co-host of this account or of this space. | ||
| And follow Harrison Smith as well because Harrison Smith is usually the host of this show. | ||
| So if you've enjoyed this time and this conversation, I highly recommend that you tap on his profile and follow him. | ||
| And obviously go to Infowarsstore.com to be the reason that we were able to broadcast on the air like this. | ||
| More in one minute. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The American Journal with Chase Geyser, your compass to the nation's crossroads on Infowars. | |
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. - I'm having a great conversation with so many amazing listeners in the X space. | ||
| You can find it at RealChaseGeyser if you're on the radio listening on X. Tap on the profile picture, join the space, and request to speak. | ||
| Harrison, who is normally the host of the American Journal, does a fantastic job all the time, is requesting to speak. | ||
| I see that your hand is raised. Harrison, what do you have to say? | ||
| Yeah, no, I'm actually just really enjoying listening to the space, and I really like that last caller from Detroit. | ||
| And he brought up a couple good points, and just as you guys are talking, I've just been making notes of things that I find sort of missing from this story. | ||
| First, have you talked about rods from gods, the tungsten rods? | ||
| I have not talked about it, but I know exactly what you're talking about. | ||
| Please share with the audience. | ||
| Yeah, it's called hypervelocity. | ||
| Essentially, they're just rods. | ||
| They're just metal rods, no explosives on them. | ||
| But when dropped from space, they can reach hypervelocity and essentially have the same impact as a nuclear bomb. | ||
| And so that makes me think that it would be a lot of wasted effort to put a nuclear bomb up on a satellite when you can literally just put a one foot by a hundred foot It seems to me like once that technology was discovered or figured out that countries probably wouldn't waste their time building nukes and launching those to get essentially the same effect. | ||
| The only reason you would use nukes from space would be to create an EMP by detonating them high in the atmosphere and that would create the EMP effect. | ||
| But again, as the last caller from Detroit pointed out, The Satan missiles, the hypersonic ICBM missiles they have, again, sort of makes nuclear satellite technology redundant. | ||
| It just wouldn't be necessary. | ||
| And I'll say one more thing. | ||
| Years ago, before I ever worked at Infowars, I was talking to an engineer who worked on satellites. | ||
| And he told me, and I don't know how exactly true this is, but he, at the time, was working on Defense Department contracts and producing single solid-state fuel rocket engines, which was pretty crazy. | ||
| But he essentially said that if you had about one ton of ball bearings, you could knock out every communication satellite in orbit right now. | ||
| Because there's something called cold fusion that takes place in space. | ||
| That might not be the right term for it, but essentially in space, in the vacuum, when two metals... | ||
| I think it's called. And so if you just release a ton of ball bearings in low orbit at the same level as the satellites, about one ton of ball bearings would essentially knock out every satellite in the atmosphere permanently. | ||
| So I think people maybe underestimate how... | ||
| How fragile our satellite systems are. | ||
| So I thought what that guy brought up was a couple good points from the ICBMs and the ability to knock out satellites. | ||
| But okay, I'm sorry. Don't apologize. | ||
| I'm sorry for interrupting. | ||
| I'll get back to enjoying it. | ||
| That's amazing. And just for the audience, for the sake of the audience, the conversations that I've had about Rod's I've been with personal friends that I have who have been in the intelligence community. | ||
| It's similar to like if you watch Lord of the Rings or any sort of medieval war movie where there's a siege happening and you have people on the ground trying to get through the gate and then you have We're good to go. | ||
| Technology like that doesn't have the same regulations and international treaties and agreements as nuclear weapons do. | ||
| So it's just politically a lot easier to find alternative ways to level the same destruction. | ||
| Were you going to say something, Harrison? No, no, I think you're exactly right that, you know, you sign this treaty saying no nukes in space and then you go, all right, well, yeah, we can sign that. | ||
| No problem. We'll just use the rods. | ||
| You know, they don't mention the rods in the treaty. | ||
| That's fine. And, you know, I can't even imagine how you could detect them since they could be built, you know. | ||
| Anyway, these things are definitely happening, and there's a story from April 2023 about China developing these as well. | ||
| The last thing I'll mention is there was a story earlier this week. | ||
| I've had it on my desk every day, but I've just never gotten to it because there's so much other pressing news that I've had to get to. | ||
| But there was a story that is a common theme that dates all the way back to the 70s, where off the coast of California, multiple, they call them whistleblowers, reported that UFOs disabled nukes on board Air Force planes, that there reported that UFOs disabled nukes on board Air Force planes, that there were unidentified flying objects that would that basically would get up close to these aircraft, you know, American aircraft and disable the nukes | ||
| And I just again, as I was listening to the show, that just popped into my mind thinking, OK, does that have anything to do with this? | ||
| It's got space. It's got nukes. | ||
| It might have something to do with everything that we're seeing. | ||
| Maybe instead of UFOs, they were some sort of Russian craft, spacecraft that could disable nuclear weapons. | ||
| So it's something that, again, I haven't seen a lot of people talk about, but that was a big story in the Daily Mail and the Sun and a couple of others. | ||
| Yeah, I think we just lost Harrison for a little bit. | ||
| I think your signal cut out, Harrison, but I think your point is well received regarding some of these capabilities. | ||
| And one thing is for sure, if we know anything, we know that there is... | ||
| An entirely different dimension of conflict and war and espionage that's happening underneath the surface. | ||
| One of my favorite movies is a movie called Constantine with Keanu Reeves. | ||
| I don't know if the audience has seen that, but there's this dynamic of angels versus demons. | ||
| And the battleground is Earth. | ||
| And in this sort of alternative reality... | ||
| Certain people, namely the main character, can witness the conflict or the war as it's happening. | ||
| So somebody might be drinking coffee at a cafe and an angel and a demon could be literally battling right next to that person, but that person would be totally unaware, right? | ||
| So you've got this concept of this war between people Good and evil forces these good and evil supernatural forces that's sort of biblically supported that's always waging and we see the same thing happen with these with with our nations with our intelligence communities where there is this other sort of upside down world or alternative universe in which espionage and war And assassinations and overthrows are happening without the public even being aware of what's going on. | ||
| And that's why you have to be so skeptical about what you believe when it's reported from our own politicians as well as those of others, our own mainstream media, as well as the sort of international media which is basically run by the United States intelligence, all the European media and everything. | ||
| You have to be skeptical because they are... | ||
| Playing a game on a dimension that we don't perceive and we are pieces in the game more than participants in the game more often than not. | ||
| So just be aware that you are... | ||
| The players are trying to move you as the piece, right? | ||
| And they need your consent. | ||
| They need you to fall for it. | ||
| And they're trying everything they can to make sure that there's just as little resistance or pushback to any moves that they want to make as possible. | ||
| I mean, that's what's going on. | ||
| So let's pop in and let Travis speak. | ||
| Travis, you had your hand raised for quite some time in the last segment. | ||
| I want to give you an opportunity to say what you have to say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Chase. How are you doing? | |
| Good. Thank you for having me on. | ||
| I'm a licensed clinical social worker and a combat veteran, so it's kind of an interesting perspective to have on these things. | ||
| And the common theme that I always hear in the shows and in real life is, how do we get people to wake up? | ||
| Well... It's through the trauma lens. | ||
| I'm a trauma specialist. | ||
| That's my thing in therapy. | ||
| But when people get disconnected, it's quick. | ||
| But there's a polyvagal nerve. | ||
| It connects the mind and the body. | ||
| Trauma happens through relationships. | ||
| And the only way to heal through trauma is through that relationship. | ||
| So it is all just a giant sky up like we're talking about. | ||
| And I feel like we're at a hard time where we need to step up and just completely stop these people. | ||
| But we also need to have compassion and connection with our fellow Americans that don't realize that they are being brainwashed into doing this satanic, demonic, traumatized things of, you know, alienating each other, abortions, and having these ideologies that they can't see are their own demise. | ||
| Yeah, I absolutely agree with you. | ||
| And that was kind of what I was trying to say earlier about balancing compassion with sort of pushback, right? | ||
| Because we don't want to just alienate everybody. | ||
| And I don't know if you've seen it. | ||
| I heard that you have a background in social work. | ||
| Have you seen that TED Talk from, I can't remember the gentleman's name. | ||
| He was not an American, but he gave a TED Talk on addiction. | ||
| And he looked into the studies and the research that I believe was done in Amsterdam versus in the United States. | ||
| And basically they realized using... | ||
| tests on mice or lab rats basically that much of addiction is actually about a sense of disconnectedness with the community more than it is about the actual physical addiction of any substance. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you familiar with any of that? Yeah, it's called Rat Park. | |
| And they took a couple, they did it together, they gave them water with cocaine, and then they gave them normal water. | ||
| When they're isolated, they lean towards the cocaine. | ||
| But then when they gave them a huge arena, and if you see the study that they put to rats and the thing was massive, there was all kinds of stuff. | ||
| And they leaned away from the cocaine. | ||
| And it's the same, though, with trauma, with the way that it works with the limbic system in the brain is the minute that's activated, you will continue to isolate and lean into that. | ||
| And I think that is where they are grabbing a hold of Americans and people around the world. | ||
| And they're just strangulating them away from having connection with each other. | ||
| And it's sad and scary and dangerous all at the same time. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| And the crazy thing about it is, despite the fact that we're familiar with all this research about how isolation and addiction are so interwoven, and isolation and suicidal ideation are so interwoven, despite all of that, our government, our politicians, our major media outlets, our major sort of corporations pushed so hard for the lockdowns over the course of the pandemic as if there wasn't going to be any negative consequences of that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I forgot the term, but it is like a mass traumatization of the population. | |
| It was It was definitely intentional. | ||
| I mean, that's just my personal, from a psychological point of view, looking at it, they definitely did it on purpose. | ||
| Yeah. A lot of doubt. | ||
| We're seeing the effects of that right now. | ||
| Thank you, Travis, for chiming in. | ||
| I do want to give some other speakers the opportunity to speak since we have this long, uninterrupted segment. | ||
| Let's hear from Nathaniel. | ||
| Nathaniel, if you're still with us, go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you've got to say. | ||
| If you don't unmute yourself here in a second, then we'll just move on to the next speaker in the queue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Hey, what's up, Chase? | |
| How are you, my man? Thanks for taking me in or whatever. | ||
| Let me speak. Absolutely. | ||
| So basically, well, first off, I just want to say, holy, you guys just went off on a whole, like, you guys got me tripping right now about the Russian space nukes and the rods from gods. | ||
| I've never heard about the rods from gods before, so that's entirely new to me. | ||
| I've got to do some research on that. | ||
| What I wanted to talk about was all of these shootings that are going on in other places. | ||
| Like, obviously, we know they're trying to disarm America, right? | ||
| But do you think that all these shootings are happening so frequently because they're trying to disarm America before some sort of, like, Mm-hmm. | ||
| No, that's all I just wanted to say. | ||
| In my opinion, they're not trying to take away our guns in order to prevent civil war. | ||
| They're trying to cause civil war in order to justify taking away our guns. | ||
| Right? People think about it sort of backwards. | ||
| So they want the conflict. | ||
| They want the division. They want the terrorist attacks. | ||
| They want the economic crises. | ||
| They want the pandemics. | ||
| Because every single time something bad happens on a massive scale to our people, the government gets more powerful. | ||
| And organizations, just like organisms... | ||
| Seek to live as long as possible, expand as much as possible, be as powerful as possible. | ||
| And this deep state sort of massive globalization of government is an entity in and of itself that is not necessarily controlled by any one person within it, but it's operating with its own sort of decentralized consciousness. | ||
| I want to take Max. Max, you've got your hand raised. | ||
| Max, what do you have to say, man? | ||
| Go ahead and unmute yourself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, what's going on, Chase? | |
| Hey, man. Can you hear me? Yep. | ||
| Okay, awesome. Yeah, Nathaniel, I think that honestly, any more upon just kind of observing the environment in which we live in in America anymore, that either school shootings or like, for example, the Chiefs Parade yesterday, whether it be in public, I don't think really where it matters so much. | ||
| But I think that we're finally starting to see the results of the society that's been laid down. | ||
| A godless one. | ||
| Kids in our youth pumped up full of antidepressants therapy. | ||
| I think that there's expelling God from society, the courtroom, schools, and I think people are just naturally unhappy anymore. | ||
| I think that America's got to be one of the most probably unhappy countries in the world at this point, and especially the youth. | ||
| I mean, they're just poisoned. And so I think that We're finally starting to see the results and the effects of what happens upon all those things kind of taking shape and all those factors playing big roles in people's lives anymore. | ||
| And so I think that, honestly, at the root of it, Is that that's the major result that we're seeing upon Christianity being expelled from American society? | ||
| Because from then, everything else just collapsed. | ||
| I mean, you just took out the one main giant pillar that upholds, you know, morality and decency. | ||
| And so I'd say that honestly, anymore, a lot of these shootings are probably more natural than manufactured by the federal, the feds. | ||
| Crazy take. Nathaniel, go ahead and respond. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, I honestly do agree with pretty much everything you just said. | |
| This is all rooted from godlessness 100%. | ||
| I mean... | ||
| I can see definitely how some people might just justify, I guess, their mentality. | ||
| They snap and they just say, screw it, you know, and they go do whatever they feel like they have to do. | ||
| But I don't see how that would cause an entire civil war. | ||
| I don't see people, like, unless enough people finally have had enough with everything going on that you just talked about, you know, the economical collapse. | ||
| And just the stress and the therapy and the godlessness and just all this evil from every direction, that might cause the Civil War first before anything. | ||
| But I think you're right. That is what they're pushing towards. | ||
| And that's why they're trying to cause as much stress and anxiety on this godless country as possible. | ||
| Yeah, good thoughts. I see Alexander's got his hand raised here in the space. | ||
| Alexander, if you're still there, go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you've got to say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I just wanted to provide some commentary on the... | |
| Issues with shootings in the United States. | ||
| So I think the United States is in sort of a cycle, a season, like we'll just say like winter. | ||
| I think we're going to be in this, you know, for the next like maybe six years. | ||
| But what I wanted to say to everyone else, as people devolve, decay, And kind of get worse and maybe even a little bit more evil too as time goes along. | ||
| It really provides an opportunity for us to get stronger, get better, and even more resilient. | ||
| So the cycle I'm just talking about is just the fourth turning. | ||
| And I'm thinking that things have to get a lot worse, a lot worse before they get better. | ||
| And it's always the darkest before the light. | ||
| Now, just my last prediction for 2024, by the way, and then I'll mute myself. | ||
| My prediction for 2024 is dollar collapse, full dollar collapse, and then Trump rebuild gold-backed currency. | ||
| That's my full prediction for 2024. | ||
| Dollar collapse. | ||
| And then Trump's getting back in. | ||
| I know that sounds delusional because... | ||
| But I also predicted the whole 2020 steal it from him when I was telling my family because they wanted to go. | ||
| And I was like, no way. Wow. | ||
| That's fascinating. It's funny that you mentioned that. | ||
| And I'm going to call on Jay the narrative of the story here in a second because he's got his hand raised. | ||
| But I saw this article today on the desk. | ||
| Zimbabwe is attempting to establish a gold-backed currency. | ||
| I wonder how long it's going to be before there's some sort of a CIA-sponsored coup in Zimbabwe because anything like this typically really triggers the establishment sort of deep state that's hell-bent on keeping the dollars, the global reserve currency. | ||
| Go ahead, Alexander. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I'm sorry to interrupt you. | |
| All I was going to say is BRICS, Operation Sandman, and then... | ||
| It's like since everyone's going to go do World War III, and also wars are kicking up with Israel and the Middle East, everyone's going to transition back to a gold system. | ||
| The Ponzi scheme's over, and generally when this cycle ends, it's a big war. | ||
| So there's going to be this huge crash, and there's going to be some pretext for a giant war, and then we're going to transition into a new economic system in a multipolar world. | ||
| But I was reading about that over 10 years ago when I was listening to Alex Jones in eighth grade, because I was trying to reason about why there was going to be a North American Union. | ||
| I don't think there's going to be a North American Union, but I do believe that Mexico will do a Reconquista in the next 10 to 15 years. | ||
| Hmm. Let me just reiterate this. | ||
| You mean like Texas technically doesn't have the right to this land, but we have it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is that what you're trying to say? I'm trying to say anyone, any opposing force will say that. | |
| Right. Okay, and let me, I'm just letting you know, the Mexicans will say that. | ||
| And I've lived in Sonora, I've lived all through Mexico. | ||
| Okay, I just moved back recently. | ||
| But I'm just letting all you Texans know, you will say We have to fight. | ||
| Now, the stupid, idiot Americans don't protect their sovereignty in their country. | ||
| And I'm one of you guys. | ||
| And even though I love Mexico a lot, but still, it's going to happen. | ||
| But my point to Harrison is that when a nation wins awards, you have the right to do With what you want. | ||
| And even though bad things might happen or not the most moral things happen, wake up to war. | ||
| Wake up to how America dealt with the Indians. | ||
| Wake up to how the other nations dealt with each other in war. | ||
| That's a reality. Okay, that's my last point. | ||
| Well, thank you for that point. | ||
| Harrison, obviously, if you want to respond to that, just raise your hand and I'll call on you to respond to that. | ||
| I understand that you're just listening and doing other things right now. | ||
| We have about one minute left before we're going to cut to a four-minute break. | ||
| So, Jay, the Narrative Destroyer, I'm going to call on you at the beginning of the next segment because I don't want to have to cut you off. | ||
| I want to give you enough time to say what you've got to say because you've had your hand raised for some time. | ||
| So, I want to give you time to do that. | ||
| In the meantime, I encourage everybody to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And check out the awesome new sale for Bodies. | ||
| Bodies is now 40% off. | ||
| This is an absolutely amazing product for anybody who suffers from any sort of soreness or tenderness or inflammation, specifically in the joints. | ||
| I've got a bleeding disorder. | ||
| I'm a hemophiliac, and so I actually sort of As a young man, suffer from some pain and discomfort in my joints that might be more associated or akin to somebody that's elderly because of the hemorrhaging that happens inside my own body. | ||
| And this product has been an amazing anti-inflammatory for me. | ||
| After I was at the border, I was sore. | ||
| My ankle was swollen. | ||
| I was limping for a couple of days at the office. | ||
| And just taking this really put me in a position where I could get up and around without being distracted with pain. | ||
| So check out Bodies right now at InfoWarsStore.com and be the reason that we are still on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is The American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Chase Geyser. | ||
| We are back. We have been doing this exit space for an hour. | ||
| We're going to do it for the rest of the show today, and it was a little bit of a long one. | ||
| But I've just been enjoying the conversation so much that I wanted to keep it rolling. | ||
| I just kind of set it up to let it burn. | ||
| And I just noticed people were requesting to speak. | ||
| And so I thought, hey, let's take some. | ||
| Jay, the narrative destroyer, I know you've had your hand raised for some time. | ||
| If you are still there, now is the time to unmute yourself and say what you got to say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead, Jay. I got two points to make. | |
| One, America was sold out a long time ago. | ||
| We started borrowing from Europe. | ||
| We originally weren't supposed to. | ||
| So we started borrowing from Europe and they started taking over our economy. | ||
| And they started taking over everything else and they incorporated us. | ||
| So what you're seeing is liquidation of assets. | ||
| What you're seeing is they know and they're foreseeing that our system is going to fail and they are liquidating the assets, which is In terms, that's why they're spending so much money. | ||
| They're spending so much money because they're liquidating their assets. | ||
| And they're doing it almost invisible to everyone else. | ||
| Everyone else is so worried. | ||
| They're like, oh, why are we spending so much money on Ukraine? | ||
| Because they're liquidating assets. | ||
| They're taking the money out of us. | ||
| They're literally selling us out. | ||
| The second point is, is the people in charge do not believe in a Jesus or a God. | ||
| They believe that Satan is Jesus. | ||
| And if you doubt me, look into it. | ||
| Just look into it. These people in charge believe that Satan... | ||
| He is the crucified one. | ||
| And Satan was the one sent to earth by God. | ||
| And that he is Jesus. | ||
| Okay? So what you're dealing with is very, very twisted, twisted people who believe that worshiping Satan and selling out America is the best thing for their future. | ||
| Not for our future. They could care less about our future. | ||
| Okay? Because we're already done. | ||
| We've already been sold, dude. | ||
| We are done. | ||
| The only thing that we can do is restructure. | ||
| That's it. And I think you agree with me, Chase. | ||
| And I pray for you every day, dude, because the Masons started, okay? | ||
| They started this belief in Satan being Jesus. | ||
| Well, prayers are always welcome. | ||
| I appreciate that. Let's hear from Philip, who's had his hand raised. | ||
| Philip, go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you got to say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Jay just hit it on the head. | |
| He is so close, but yet so far away. | ||
| They are giving away all of us. | ||
| The money is actually linked to our birth certificates. | ||
| They had the birth certificate scam going on since the Civil War, where they grouped up with the Roman Empire, they are not the Roman, the Vatican, and the crown to put in a system where we have these birth certificates, they sell our birth certificates on a market, and they have all these royalties that incurred from our birth certificates. | ||
| When you get off, there's two different systems. | ||
| Everybody's stuck in the left-right paradigm, but there's a completely different system where you actually reclaim the beneficiary to your birth certificate, and they can no longer come after you. | ||
| They can't come after you in their admiralty courts, and that's what the little golden thing is around the flags and all the different court systems. | ||
| They're operating underneath admiralty law because everybody is lost at sea. | ||
| You have to learn— I've heard this before. | ||
| We should definitely encourage the audience to look into it. | ||
| This is like a major rabbit hole, and I don't think we have enough time to get into it today. | ||
| But some of the things you're pointing out I think are very interesting, Philip, and I appreciate you bringing them to the fore. | ||
| I don't want to go down that rabbit hole just for the sake of the rest of the audience, but I do appreciate it. | ||
| And please feel free to request to speak again in the future. | ||
| Maybe we can do a space specifically on it. | ||
| Kevin, I see that you've had your hand raised for some time. | ||
| If you're still there, Kevin, go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you have to say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm here, Chase, and I love what you guys are doing with this open spaces thing. | |
| It's so much better than the call-in. | ||
| I had a comment, too. | ||
| Two, really, and I'll get to them quick. | ||
| First, I think that Adrian thing is the Grok AI that talks to Alex's Elon. | ||
| But I don't know. | ||
| I'm very socially awkward. | ||
| I'm like a computer myself, and I recognize the patterns. | ||
| But... On the Israel issue, I think we need to be cautious about that. | ||
| I'm not saying anything you or Harrison have said is incorrect necessarily, especially as regards deep state actions, taking advantage of and killing people who are innocent and bystanders. | ||
| I think that's horrible. The thing is, I think Israel predates all modern society. | ||
| If you go back... | ||
| Can I just interrupt you for a second? | ||
| Because I want to let you finish, but I just have one point to make as you raise that. | ||
| If we're going to go by predating and whose land it originally was and who actually has a right to it, then that means that we should just give the United States back to the Native Americans. | ||
| I mean, technically, we should just give the whole thing to the Iroquois, right? | ||
| Yeah. No, that's not what I'm saying at all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, not at all. Pardon me then. | |
| The Iroquois, they didn't have a covenant with God specifically in the same way that Abraham did before Israel. | ||
| Because Abraham remembers the father of Jacob and Esau through Isaac. | ||
| And Abraham is right out of Shinar. | ||
| Okay, so we're talking before Egypt, God gives the land to Israel. | ||
| Then there's a famine. And then Israel returns back into the land through Joseph. | ||
| But in the Old Testament... | ||
| It says those who bless you, I'll bless you. | ||
| Those who curse you, I will curse you. | ||
| In the New Testament, Christ says we've been grafted into the vine. | ||
| Or maybe it's Paul that says that. | ||
| In Revelation, it talks about 12. | ||
| In Romans, we're grafted into the line of Abraham through baptism. | ||
| So the covenant with Abraham applies to Gentiles as well. | ||
| It's the whole reason Jesus came. 100%. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So finally, in Revelation, 12,000 are sealed from each tribe. | |
| And it's not what the Jehovah's Witnesses say. | ||
| That 144,000, they're Israel. | ||
| They're Jewish. They're probably virgins. | ||
| They're probably children of deep state actors who've piloted the country into a real problem. | ||
| But God says in the Old Testament that Israel will return to the land in the day. | ||
| So I think you're right about the deep state. | ||
| I don't think Israel's covenant with God has ever been based on Israel doing the right thing necessarily. | ||
| It's been based on God's promise, period. | ||
| He's got to keep his promise regardless. | ||
| I agree with that notion. Even if you screw up, God's going to do what he said he was going to do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so either she's a bad girlfriend or it's like we're Jon Snow and we're bastard heirs and they're the real heir. | |
| Well, the heir's actually going to be a brat, but if you tell the king, the king's going to slap you. | ||
| So, okay, let the king... | ||
| Anyway, I just say that because I think you guys are right, but I think we've got to be careful because there's a spiritual element and a metaphysical nature to this that is beyond political appearances. | ||
| Very, very good points there. | ||
| I see that FedUpWithMedia has requested to speak. | ||
| I've granted you speaker access, so go ahead and unmute yourself and say what you've got to say, FedUpWithMedia. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, well, the problem with the situation, I agree, I've made that argument several times. | |
| People make the historical argument with Israel. | ||
| It's like, are we prepared to hand the We're good to go. | ||
| It was founded by a global cabal that basically started in Britain. | ||
| It wasn't a bordering country conquered the neighboring country. | ||
| No, it was the global powers after World War II saying, well, we need this place to put folks, and we say it's their native homeland, and there's documents for them and the other people that are there, so we're going to take a chunk from the people that are living there and hand it over. | ||
| It was like a... | ||
| eviction in a way. | ||
| And the thing is, the early people, I mean, Golda Meir admitted that and even said she was Palestinian. | ||
| You know, that's the thing that I find funny about all this is that they try to claim that it was only their land, but the founding people of Israel, the founding leaders of the current modern Israel, lived there before Israel existed and had Palestinian passports. lived there before Israel existed and had Palestinian passports. | ||
| And like I said, said they were Palestinian and you can go far back. | ||
| I'm an Orthodox Christian and we do readings about the saints and there's Palestinian named Palestinian saints from the second and third century. | ||
| And I appreciate all your points. | ||
| We're We're about ready to come up on a radio break, so I'm sorry to cut you off, but... | ||
| I just want to summarize this whole Israel-Palestine conflict. | ||
| What bothers me so much about it? | ||
| It bothers me that as someone who is America first, we are caught up in talking about who is right in this dispute that should have nothing to do with us. | ||
| That's all, folks. That's all I'm saying. | ||
| So stick with us, folks. In four minutes, we'll be right back. | ||
| More speakers, more news. Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser, your host today. | ||
| This is the last segment before the beginning of the Alex Jones Show. | ||
| Today, the Alex Jones Show is going to be hosted by Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Alex has given his voice a rest, so he can come back and hit it hard next week. | ||
| And the War Room this afternoon is going to be hosted by the great Harrison Smith, who was kind enough to join us as a speaker in this X space today as we run his own show for him since he's filling in for Owen this afternoon. | ||
| A little bit of an update. During the Alex Jones show today, Harrison and I will actually be in studio for much of the show with Owens. | ||
| They'll be the three of us sort of as a roundtable. | ||
| And we will be starting a space, I believe, at around 1230, maybe earlier than that, specifically for that show as well. | ||
| And letting that space run for the duration of the show. | ||
| So make sure if you've enjoyed this conversation, it's going to be next level with Owens. | ||
| With Owen, Harrison, and myself all together in one room and that space as well. | ||
| So thank you so much for popping in and joining us here on this space. | ||
| I know that at the end of the last segment, Tom Bombadil had their hand raised. | ||
| If you have something that you'd like to share, you go ahead and unmute yourself and say what's on your mind now. | ||
| I know that your hand's not raised anymore, so I just wanted to put that out there that I'm happy to call on you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead, Tom. Thank you very much for having me, Chase, and thank you InfoWaz. | |
| It's a great space. | ||
| I've been following Alex for many years. | ||
| I shared some info from across the pond, so to speak, since I'm as Bombadil who sits in the land of Mordor. | ||
| Well, the Lord of the Rings actually is quite epic. | ||
| I couldn't believe that they kept Tom Bombadil out of the movies. | ||
| He was such an important character in the first book. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, if you translate Tom Bombadil to what he really is, you know, he's not affected by the ring. | |
| He was there first. | ||
| His feet are faster. | ||
| His voice is stronger. | ||
| You cannot touch him. | ||
| So, actually, Tolkien, we're working as a MI5 player. | ||
| Sort of in the First World War, intelligence operations and signalist operations. | ||
| So he knew the guys behind, let's call it the central banking system, And the crypto AG and the atomic bomb and so on. | ||
| Sort of this kind of oligarchy, the glue of the oligarchy that is involved in all the nefarious business running up to their bank for international settlements and Bretton Woods and so on, so on, so on, so on, so on. | ||
| We have them here at home in Mordor. | ||
| They are called the Balambais and they are never seen that much So we are trying to, we are getting there now. | ||
| You know, it's fascinating to me. | ||
| I don't know if you were paying attention a couple of days ago. | ||
| Alex Jones covered it on his show fairly extensively. | ||
| Fox News came out with an article saying that British intelligence, I believe, Is coming out and saying that an interest in things like George Orwell or C.S. Lewis or J.R.R. Tolkien is a red flag that someone might be an extremist. | ||
| And so they're now sort of coming out and saying look if you like these books, if you like these stories. | ||
| Then you could be labeled or put on a list as a person of interest in terms of domestic terrorism. | ||
| Why is it, do you think, that first of all we see all of this truth about the nature of our government and civilization reflected in fiction and then consequently we see the establishment, whether it's the mainstream media or the political classes generally, do everything it can to Disparage and censor these basically classics of literature and film. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because they make people think, you know. | |
| They are of course written in metaphors and so on. | ||
| Tolkien had a really hard time getting his books published. | ||
| He had to rewrite them, you know. | ||
| So Bombardil is protected in his neutral forest or whatever. | ||
| Nobody can get to him there. | ||
| And he has its network all over the place, so he has all the information anyway. | ||
| So according to me, he describes the global network company called Ericsson, who runs the telecoms and so on globally. | ||
| And they are the only company that Mr. | ||
| Trump went after as early as his campaign for 2016. | ||
| He went for them. | ||
| And right now, as we sit there and speak, and since September 2019, they are put under the DOA slash the Space Force. | ||
| So Space Force, I think, was created to take over their operations. | ||
| And by that also, the Investor Company, which is one of the three big ones. | ||
| You have Investor, you have Vanguard, you have BlackRock. | ||
| That's all of the... The three big hitters when it comes to, let's say, the heritage from the East India companies, which just morphed into IG Farben, and IG Farben morphed into Investor Van Gogh and BlackRock, | ||
| if you want to keep it. Of course, it's a bigger deal than that, but if you want to take it very quick and easy, and that's sort of the main structure that has happened since... | ||
| More or less since the late 19th century, these operations went on. | ||
| And of course, the Fed is their key point. | ||
| So, I mean, they were not even dried from Woodrow Wilson's pen before they kicked the First World War, who led to, of course, was their runner-up to the Second World War to be able to create the Bank for International Settlements. | ||
| Right. And people criticize John Maynard Keynes quite a bit. | ||
| Keynesian economics versus Austrian economics. | ||
| And I agree. | ||
| I'm more of an Austrian economics guy. | ||
| I'm a laissez-faire capitalist. | ||
| I believe in real currency, not fiat currency. | ||
| But one of the things that people I think mischaracterize about Keynesian economics is when John Maynard Keynes was involved in Bretton Woods, he agreed with some of the proposals Based on the understanding that the U.S. dollar would remain backed by gold. | ||
| So a lot of what we're seeing now is even worse than Keynesian. | ||
| It's like a level of Keynesian that Keynes himself would not lower himself to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, no, no. He was making the arguments correctly at Bretton Woods. | |
| He was opposing actually to introduce... | ||
| And he took his thinking from actually some of the Swedish economists, you know, the world's first central bank and all of this. | ||
| It comes from here. | ||
| So McKittrick, the boss of the Bank of International Settlements at this point in time, he is actually the protégé of Wallenberg, one of the Wallenbergs, the one that sort of set everything up for the banking thing in the 20s, 30s and running up. | ||
| And McKittrick is also a... | ||
| A childhood friend with the Dulles brothers that also are involved in this. | ||
| And then you have the Warburgs Bank, you have the Hambro Bank, which is the Wallenberg Bank more or less. | ||
| And you have the Keenen Loeb. | ||
| And you have, of course, the Warburg Bank. | ||
| So the Warburgs, they are everywhere. | ||
| They are on both sides of the oceans. | ||
| You have some of the brothers in the Fed. | ||
| You have the other brothers running the IG farm and stuff together with the Wallenbergs more or less. | ||
| And here they are very visible. | ||
| This is historical proof and there is documentation of it all. | ||
| And these are still the same people that have been, you know, running us towards this kind of abyss with the fiat currency. | ||
| It is amazing how long they have been able to run this cycle. | ||
| But with the goal so that the world population have, you know, since after the Second World War, quadrupled or even more. | ||
| That's how you backfill this Ponzi scheme. | ||
| So if you look from a satellite perspective. | ||
| Thank you for having me, Chase. | ||
| Great being here. Thank you, Tom. | ||
| I appreciate you joining the space and speaking. | ||
| The way that the monetary system is set up, as I understand it, and I've looked into fractional reserves. | ||
| I've studied Creature from Jekyll Island. | ||
| I've looked into International Monetary Fund, what the WEF is doing, World Central Banking. | ||
| The way it works is just like a Ponzi scheme. | ||
| They've got to spend as much as possible in order to sort of fuel it. | ||
| It's inevitable that it's going to collapse and all you can do is delay the inevitability. | ||
| But eventually, since it's inevitable, you can't delay it anymore. | ||
| So I've sort of been arriving at this conclusion recently as I contemplate this. | ||
| And I'd love to talk about this perhaps in another space. | ||
| You guys are on another broadcast. I'll be on the air tomorrow too. | ||
| I've been arriving at a place where I think that they have shifted from a mindset of... | ||
| How what a mindset of what can we do to delay the collapse? | ||
| Or push the collapse down the road or kick the can down the road. | ||
| They've shifted from that strategy to, okay, we know it's coming any minute, so now we need to focus all of our attention on ensuring that when the collapse happens, we are in control of the Great Reset. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We are in control of what happens next, of who's going to be held accountable for it, and that's why they are just frantically trying to get as much power as possible over all of us worldwide now because they know this collapse is imminent and they want to control how we've In a world where ancient remedies blend with modern science, | |
| Jones knows the secret. | ||
| Bawd Ease from InfoWars Life isn't just any treasure, but the ultimate turmeric and inflammatory support. | ||
| For millennia, turmeric's power has been recognized, but not all turmeric is created equal. | ||
| With InfoWars Bawd Ease, you're getting turmeric root extract in a much more potent form. | ||
| And the magic doesn't stop at turmeric. | ||
| Paired with ingredients known for their anti-inflammatory properties like organic sage leaf and others, Baudi's is a symphony of nature's best. | ||
| Joint support, flexibility, inflammation, and immune support. | ||
| With Baudi's, you're not just unlocking the secrets of ancient remedies, but also supporting the show. | ||
| Discover the power of all natural turmeric. |
Export Selection